Ilm-e-Khshnoom - Traditional Zoroastrianism: Tenets of the Religion
Ilm-e-Khshnoom - Traditional Zoroastrianism: Tenets of the Religion
Ilm-e-Khshnoom - Traditional Zoroastrianism: Tenets of the Religion
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Laws <strong>of</strong> Staota etc.<br />
HISTORY OF THE PARSI<br />
RELIGIOUS THOUGHT<br />
Main lecture was followed by a small one by Manchershah Kekobad (whom we have already met in this<br />
series). He said that <strong>the</strong> western education brought <strong>the</strong> so termed "rationalism", which shook our faith for<br />
our Din. This was followed by "philology", which tried to translate our Scriptures and to show that <strong>the</strong>re was<br />
'something' in <strong>the</strong>m, but we could not understand what it was. Then arrived agnosticism <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. Huxeley<br />
followed by "Spiritualism" and "Theosophy". All did provide some light or <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r on Dharma. Pr<strong>of</strong>essors<br />
like Dr. Haug and Dr. Geiger had rendered no less service, but after all <strong>the</strong>y were looking to our Dharma in<br />
Christian light; some said Theosophy was a side light or <strong>the</strong> stand point <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Religious. In this state <strong>of</strong><br />
affairs, we have today acquired a new and Jarthoshti source for understanding our Jarthoshti Dharma.<br />
Manchershah referred to <strong>the</strong> late K. R. Cama's statement that Baheramshahji was speaking on <strong>the</strong><br />
matters <strong>of</strong> Jarthoshti Din itself, as was evident from several Avesta words he uttered.<br />
VIMADALAL'S MASTERLY<br />
ELUCIDATION.<br />
From <strong>the</strong> chair, Jehangirji Vimadalal referred to <strong>the</strong> laws <strong>of</strong> vibrations and colours which were at <strong>the</strong> basis<br />
<strong>of</strong> our Manthra prayers. We can take Ahura Mazda as a white ray <strong>of</strong> Light and Ameshaspends as <strong>the</strong> seven<br />
colours emanating from it. Prayers are a force we transmit to Ahuramazda. We must be thankful to Him for<br />
His gift <strong>of</strong> Manthra Prayers to us. In <strong>the</strong> very beginning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Yazashney Kriya, Ahuramazda,<br />
Ameshaspends, Yazats are invited. From this we can understand that in our Kriya's a magnetic force is<br />
generated from <strong>the</strong> things and apparatus used <strong>the</strong>rein and sent to <strong>the</strong> minoi world through Avesta<br />
Manthra. Our prayers should <strong>of</strong> necessity be in Avesta and Pazend, since <strong>the</strong>y are structured on <strong>the</strong> Laws <strong>of</strong><br />
Staota Yasna by Paigamber Saheb and His disciples and descendants, who knew those Laws through <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
own practice <strong>of</strong> Ashoi. Our Faith can become rationally sound by such lectures as today's, Jehangirji said.<br />
This was <strong>the</strong> gist <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Press report <strong>of</strong> Baheramshahji's first two lectures read on 10-3-1910 and 21-3-<br />
1910 and quoted by Sohrabji Banaji in his article in <strong>the</strong> Memorial Volume.<br />
My readers will please observe and note <strong>the</strong> Zarathushtrian subject matters <strong>of</strong> Baheramshahji's lectures.<br />
Please ponder on what o<strong>the</strong>r speakers said on his expositions <strong>of</strong> Zarthoshti Din. Are we not justified in<br />
asserting that on this overwhelming evidence, every Parsi should adopt IIm-e-<strong>Khshnoom</strong> as <strong>the</strong><br />
genuine key to decipher <strong>the</strong> ever entangling matters <strong>of</strong> our Din? Shall we be not justified in stating that if<br />
a Parsi does not adopt this key in her or his life and in his or her understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Din, he or she is<br />
ignoring a divine source sent in our Community by certain mystical Agencies? What is <strong>the</strong> sense in<br />
standing outside this divine garden and involving oneself in doubts and suspicious and self-vested<br />
arguments? Enter and enjoy <strong>the</strong> fragrance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> flowers <strong>the</strong>re. <strong>Religion</strong> goes beyond <strong>the</strong> intellectual<br />
barrier; but what should be <strong>the</strong> source on which we should rely to understand <strong>the</strong> mystical teachings and<br />
tenets <strong>of</strong> our Din, is an exercise you can do on this known side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> intellectual barrier. You cannot think out<br />
what is beyond; but what source you can adopt, you can well decide on <strong>the</strong> facts and materials available on<br />
our side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> barrier. With <strong>the</strong> evidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se eminent and truth seeking witnesses, no doubt can be left<br />
in accepting <strong>the</strong> genuineness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source, and <strong>the</strong> authority and veracity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> contents, <strong>of</strong> IIm-e-<br />
<strong>Khshnoom</strong>.<br />
* * * * *<br />
THE ERUDITE SAVANT<br />
- K. R. CAMA.<br />
We have seen that Sohrab Banaji and Manchershah Kekobad both referred to <strong>the</strong> pioneer <strong>of</strong> Avesta<br />
studies, Khurshedji R. Cama. Both say that <strong>the</strong> erudite K. R. Cama was enamoured by Baheramshahji's<br />
mystical exposition and that by itself should be taken as cogent evidence for its au<strong>the</strong>nticity and validity. This<br />
is powerfully supported by an eminent student and co-worker <strong>of</strong> K. R. Cama, <strong>the</strong> late Khodabux Edalji<br />
22