Complete Dissertaton - Final for Print with new editing - Dallas ...
Complete Dissertaton - Final for Print with new editing - Dallas ...
Complete Dissertaton - Final for Print with new editing - Dallas ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
AN IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF THE PERSONAL NEEDS<br />
AND ISSUES OF THE DALLAS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY<br />
TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY FEMALE STUDENTS<br />
__________________________<br />
A Dissertation<br />
Presented to the Faculty of<br />
<strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary<br />
___________________________<br />
In Partial Fulfillment<br />
of the Requirements <strong>for</strong> the Degree<br />
Doctor of Ministry<br />
___________________________<br />
by<br />
Lynn Etta Manning<br />
May 2009
Accepted by the Faculty of the <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary in<br />
partial fulfillment of the requirements <strong>for</strong> the degree of Doctor of Ministry<br />
Examining Committee<br />
___________________________________<br />
____________________________________
ABSTRACT<br />
AN IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF THE PERSONAL NEEDS<br />
AND ISSUES OF THE DALLAS THEOLOGICAL SEMINJARY<br />
TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY FEMALE STUDENTS<br />
Lynn Etta Manning<br />
Readers: Joye B. Baker, Linda Marten<br />
This study sought to identify the personal needs and issues of the female<br />
students at <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary (DTS) and to analyze those needs and issues.<br />
The results will guide in the development of a mentoring ministry and help to design and<br />
implement programming to better prepare and nurture the female seminarians <strong>for</strong> a life of<br />
Christian service. This D.Min. project is the first study of its kind at DTS to ask the<br />
female students to reveal their personal needs and issues. The research focuses on the<br />
identification of those needs and issues, and analyzes the frequency <strong>with</strong> which the<br />
female students experience specific needs and issues. The study also investigates the<br />
value of mentoring by an older Christian woman or a peer mentor which could contribute<br />
towards helping the women students address their personal needs and issues while<br />
attending <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary. The biblical basis and foundation of this dissertation<br />
examined the Titus 2: 3-5 passage <strong>for</strong> the support of the importance of mentoring.<br />
A descriptive survey designed by the researcher generated a 52% response<br />
rate from the 296 women students who completed and returned the survey and were<br />
currently enrolled in DTS in 2008. The survey gathered both quantitative and qualitative<br />
responses by using both closed and open-ended questions. The survey included a limited<br />
amount of demographic in<strong>for</strong>mation to protect the confidentiality and anonymity of the<br />
respondents. The survey was designed to collect demographic in<strong>for</strong>mation, to assess<br />
iii
current personal needs and issues of the female students, to discover the relevant topics to<br />
use in programming events and speakers, and to gain specific recommendations from the<br />
women students.<br />
The research <strong>for</strong> this project included a review of literature focused on the<br />
topic of mentoring, the importance of women mentoring women, and the need <strong>for</strong> both<br />
peer mentors and older, more spiritually mature mentors. This study sought to determine<br />
the need <strong>for</strong> mentoring and to consider ways to provide mentoring as part of the female<br />
seminarians’ preparation <strong>for</strong> a life of Christian ministry.<br />
iv
DEDICATION<br />
Throughout my life significant women have poured wisdom into me <strong>with</strong>out my<br />
realizing it as mentoring or as the model described in Titus 2: 3-5. No one walks this journey of<br />
life <strong>with</strong>out needing the assistance, companionship, encouragement, wisdom, com<strong>for</strong>t, and<br />
support of others who walk alongside us at some point in our journey. These important women<br />
who have most influenced me are from many walks of life and many different circumstances and<br />
relationships. I know now that I could not have made it <strong>with</strong>out them because of the powerful and<br />
positive impact they have had in my life. I acknowledge and dedicate this project to these specific<br />
women who made the writing and completion of this project possible.<br />
In Memory of:<br />
Loretta Gilmore – my mother, my dear friend<br />
who gave me life, showed me how to be a woman of integrity, a faithful wife,<br />
a devoted mother, a loving grandmother, a hard worker, and<br />
how to die <strong>with</strong> grace, dignity, and trust in the Lord.<br />
In Honor of:<br />
Molly Manning Rutty – my daughter and my dear friend<br />
who is my inspiration <strong>for</strong> trusting the Lord <strong>with</strong> all things, at all times, and in all circumstances.<br />
She has been my mentor teaching me how to love “The Father” by her love and relationship<br />
<strong>with</strong> her daddy. She refreshes my joy <strong>with</strong> her young and growing faith in the Lord,<br />
and her passion to seek God and His Word <strong>with</strong> all her heart, mind, soul,<br />
and strength has given me strength and encouragement.<br />
Erika Oropeza Manning – my daughter-in-love and my dear friend<br />
who entered our family adding love, spice, grandchildren, and perspective<br />
on how to be an intercultural family. She has brought us joy, laughter, and has<br />
mentored me by her giving of herself. Her growing relationship <strong>with</strong> the Lord and desire to seek<br />
the knowledge of His Word has been a blessing.<br />
Joye Baker – my precious friend and sister of the heart in Christ<br />
who has been my faithful peer mentor, best friend, spiritual sister, encourager, colleague, and<br />
stable influence in the pursuit of holiness and a deep walk <strong>with</strong> the Lord.<br />
She has been the “wind beneath my wings” in the completion of<br />
this dissertation and pursuit of “Doctor of Ministry.”<br />
Arlene Phelps – my spiritual mother and dear friend<br />
who brought me to the Shepherd, taught me how to love Him and walk <strong>with</strong> Him daily. She<br />
trusted me, as her mentor when she needed one; and mentored me from the beginning<br />
of our relationship on the love <strong>for</strong> God’s Word, to depend on the Savior through prayer,<br />
to teach others His Word, and to trust Him always.<br />
The DTS women students – my friends and inspiration<br />
who provided the personal data from their lives and the relationships to trust me to mentor them.<br />
My prayer is that this study will provide a foundation as they mentor others they encounter<br />
in their walk <strong>with</strong> Christ. Their love <strong>for</strong> the Lord, pursuit of equipping themselves to serve Him,<br />
and desire to walk <strong>with</strong> complete integrity has been a blessing and encouragement.<br />
v
In addition to the women who have enriched my life, I have been extremely<br />
blessed to have a few incredible men who have loved me and believed in me beyond<br />
what I ever thought I could do, be, or accomplish. I acknowledge and dedicate this<br />
project to these amazing and godly men who have significantly touched my life.<br />
In Memory of:<br />
Mike Manning – my precious husband and best friend<br />
who loved me unconditionally, encouraged me, believed in me when I didn’t believe<br />
in myself, saw potential in me, and invested in my DTS education. He endured <strong>with</strong><br />
me, and walked every step <strong>with</strong> me while he was fighting his own battle <strong>with</strong><br />
kidney cancer. One of his goals be<strong>for</strong>e he went to be <strong>with</strong> the Lord on January 6, 2009,<br />
was to see me finish this dissertation and graduate in May 2009. Now he will<br />
have the best view of graduation from a heavenly perspective. I could not have<br />
done any of this <strong>with</strong>out his total support and love. He has been my<br />
greatest advocate and mentor as my husband and best friend of 36 ½ years.<br />
In Honor of:<br />
Jeff Manning – my son and my dear friend<br />
who has always believed in me, encouraged me, and inspired me to reach <strong>for</strong><br />
greater and greater accomplishments. He has mentored me through his steady faith<br />
and pursuit of greater and greater understanding of God’s Word. Now that his father and mentor<br />
is gone, he is an invaluable support and strength to me.<br />
Jon Rutty – my son-in-love and dear friend<br />
who is a precious addition to our family and has used his incredible faith<br />
and musical talents to bring worship alive. He has mentored my by his life of prayer, faith,<br />
kindness, and trust in the Lord and His plans <strong>for</strong> the future. And he has taught me the joy and<br />
love of praising the Lord through music.<br />
Dr. Robert Garippa – my colleague, friend and “boss” at DTS<br />
who recognized my gifts, saw my potential and gave me the opportunity to serve at DTS as the<br />
Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students. He has been a seasoned and sensitive mentor,<br />
friend, and a great support throughout the past 5 years as I have<br />
served and mentored the women students.<br />
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
LIST OF TABLES<br />
LIST OF FIGURES<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
iii<br />
xi<br />
xiv<br />
xvi<br />
Chapter<br />
1. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………….1<br />
Importance of the Study<br />
Rationale <strong>for</strong> the Study<br />
Definition of Terms<br />
Mentoring<br />
Spiritual Mothering<br />
Discipleship<br />
Shepherding<br />
Pastoral Care and Pastoral Ministry<br />
Counseling<br />
Women as Mentors<br />
Research Question and Anticipated Results<br />
Research Design of the Study<br />
Limitations<br />
Preview of Remaining Chapters<br />
2. PREVIOUS RESEARCH AND LITERATURE OVERVIEW……………..19<br />
Biblical-Theological Basis of the Study<br />
Literature Review<br />
Definitions of Mentoring<br />
General Mentoring Overview<br />
Women Mentoring Women<br />
Peer Mentoring<br />
Multi-Cultural Mentoring<br />
Mentoring in Academia<br />
Personal Issues of Seminary Women<br />
Loneliness and Isolation<br />
Depression<br />
Conclusions from Research<br />
vii
3. PROCEDURE AND RESEARCH METHOD………………………………86<br />
Research Question and Hypotheses<br />
Research Method<br />
Population<br />
Development of the Instrument<br />
Description of the Instrument<br />
Procedures <strong>for</strong> Collecting the Data<br />
Procedures <strong>for</strong> Analyzing the Data<br />
Conclusion<br />
4. RESEARCH RESULTS……………………………………………..............96<br />
Current Description of Survey Respondents<br />
Age of Respondents<br />
Marital Status of Respondents<br />
Degree Program of Respondents<br />
Campus Location<br />
Student Status<br />
Cross-tabulation of Current Age and Current Student Status<br />
Participation in Spiritual Formation Groups<br />
American Citizenship Versus International Student Population<br />
Issues of Personal Struggle<br />
Issues Related to Hypothesis Two<br />
Depression<br />
Loneliness<br />
Difficulty Handling Stress<br />
Anxiety/Fear<br />
Panic Attacks<br />
Perfectionism<br />
Issues Related to Hypothesis Three<br />
Unhealthy Personal Body Image<br />
Bulimia and Anorexia<br />
Low Self-esteem<br />
Low Self-confidence<br />
Other Issues of the DTS Female Students<br />
Alcohol Use<br />
Balancing Marriage, Family, and Studies<br />
Balancing Singleness, Family, and Studies<br />
Marital Fidelity in Thought Life<br />
Marital Fidelity in Actions<br />
Discontentment in Singleness<br />
Discontentment in Marriage<br />
Homosexual Desires<br />
viii
Masturbation<br />
Doubts about Personal Faith and Beliefs<br />
Insecurity<br />
Comparison <strong>with</strong> Other Women<br />
Communicating Intentions Appropriately <strong>with</strong> Men<br />
Developing Friendships <strong>with</strong> Men<br />
Developing Friendships <strong>with</strong> Married Women<br />
Developing Friendships <strong>with</strong> Single Women<br />
Satisfaction <strong>with</strong> Friendship/Support Network<br />
Pornography<br />
Sexual Activity<br />
Sexual Abuse<br />
Verbal and/or Emotional Abuse<br />
Physical Abuse<br />
Current Personal Needs While At DTS<br />
Need <strong>for</strong> Female Mentors and Christian Friends<br />
Past Female Mentor<br />
Current Female Mentor<br />
Peer Spiritual Mentor<br />
Desire <strong>for</strong> a Peer Spiritual Mentor<br />
Close Friendship(s)<br />
Abortion<br />
Additional Personal Needs<br />
Relationships Between Female Students and Student Wives<br />
Accountability <strong>for</strong> Behavior and Actions<br />
New Student Connections<br />
Financial Needs<br />
Desire <strong>for</strong> Personal and Relational Connection <strong>with</strong> Other<br />
Female Students<br />
Desire <strong>for</strong> Marriage<br />
Dating and Healthy Boundaries<br />
Relationships Among Female Students<br />
Family Issues<br />
Topics <strong>for</strong> Programming, Seminars, and Speakers at DTS<br />
Recommended Program or Speaker Topics<br />
Survey Correlations<br />
Depression<br />
Loneliness<br />
Low Self-esteem<br />
Perfectionism<br />
Personal Body Image<br />
Self-confidence<br />
Insecurity<br />
Discontentment <strong>with</strong> Singleness<br />
Difficulty Handling Stress<br />
Struggle <strong>with</strong> Comparing Self <strong>with</strong> Other Women<br />
ix
Relationships <strong>with</strong> Male Students<br />
Relationship <strong>with</strong> an Older Christian Woman<br />
Desire <strong>for</strong> a Female Mentor<br />
Concluding Comments from Survey<br />
Summary<br />
Demographic Results<br />
Results of the Struggles and Issues Faced by the Female Students<br />
5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS…………………………177<br />
APPENDIXES<br />
Summary of the Problem, Methodology, and Results<br />
The Problem<br />
Methodology<br />
Overall Results<br />
Demographic Summary<br />
Results Related to Research Question<br />
Results Related to Hypotheses<br />
First Hypothesis<br />
Second Hypothesis<br />
Perfectionism<br />
Loneliness<br />
Stress and Anxiety<br />
Depression<br />
Third Hypothesis<br />
Fourth Hypothesis<br />
Fifth Hypothesis<br />
Research Conclusions and Recommendations<br />
Recommendations <strong>for</strong> Further Research<br />
Implications of These Findings<br />
A. PILOT STUDY COVER LETTER 196<br />
B. DTS WOMEN STUDENTS’ SURVEY 198<br />
C. SURVEY COVER LETTER 205<br />
D. SURVEY EXPENSES 206<br />
E. EMAIL REMINDER LETTER 207<br />
F. CODING FOR SURVEY DATA RESULTS 208<br />
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY 218<br />
x
LIST OF TABLES<br />
Table<br />
Page<br />
1. Age of Respondents 97<br />
2. Current Marital Status 98<br />
3. Current Age and Current Marital Status Cross-tabulation 99<br />
4. DTS Degree 100<br />
5. Current Age and DTS Degree Cross-tabulation 101<br />
6. <strong>Dallas</strong> Campus Attendance 102<br />
7. Current Student Status 102<br />
8. Current Age and Current Student Status Cross-Tabulation 103<br />
9. Spiritual Formation Group Participation 104<br />
10. DTS Degree and Spiritual Formation Group Participation 105<br />
11. American Citizenship 105<br />
12. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Depression 107<br />
13. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Loneliness 108<br />
14. Difficulty Handling Stress 108<br />
15. Difficulty Handling Anxiety/Fear 109<br />
16. Experience Panic Attacks 110<br />
17. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Perfectionism 111<br />
18. Struggle <strong>with</strong> an Unhealthy Body Image 112<br />
19. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Either Bulimia or Anorexia 113<br />
20. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Low Self-esteem 113<br />
21. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Low Self-confidence 114<br />
xi
22. Drink Alcoholic Beverage While Attending DTS 115<br />
23. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Balancing Marriage, Family, and Studies 116<br />
24. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Balancing Singleness, Family, and Studies 117<br />
25. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Faithfulness to Husband in Thought Life 118<br />
26. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Faithfulness to Husband in Actions 118<br />
27. Discontentment in Singleness 119<br />
28. Discontentment in Marriage 120<br />
29. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Homosexual Desires 121<br />
30. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Sexual Needs Resolved <strong>with</strong> Masturbation 121<br />
31. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Doubts About Faith and Beliefs 122<br />
32. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Feelings of Insecurity 123<br />
33. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Comparison to Other Women 124<br />
34. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Communicating Intentions Appropriately <strong>with</strong> Men 125<br />
35. Difficulty Developing Meaningful Friendships <strong>with</strong> DTS Male Students 126<br />
36. Difficulty Developing Meaningful Friendships <strong>with</strong> Married Women Students 127<br />
37. Difficulty Developing Meaningful Friendships <strong>with</strong> Single Women Students 128<br />
38. Current Satisfaction <strong>with</strong> Support/Friendship Network 129<br />
39. Use, View, or Read Pornography 129<br />
40. Sexual Abuse 130<br />
41. Verbal and/or Emotional Abuse 131<br />
42. Physical Abuse 131<br />
43. Past Relationship <strong>with</strong> an Older Christian Woman as a Mentor 132<br />
44. Current Relationship <strong>with</strong> a Female Mentor and/or Desire <strong>for</strong> a Mentor 133<br />
xii
45. Current Relationship <strong>with</strong> a Peer Spiritual Mentor 134<br />
46. Desire to Have a Peer as a Mentor 135<br />
47. Desire <strong>for</strong> a Peer Mentor and Have a Peer Mentor Cross-tabulation 135<br />
48. Close Friendship(s) 136<br />
49. Need Help <strong>with</strong> Past Abortion Issues 137<br />
50. Responses to Survey Questions C6, C8, and C10-C16 on Needs 137<br />
51. Non-Academic Needs as a DTS Student 143<br />
52. Desired Speaker Topics 145<br />
53. DTS Degree and Loneliness Cross-tabulation 150<br />
54. DTS Degree and Perfectionism Cross-tabulation 154<br />
55. DTS Degree and Unhealthy Body Image Cross-tabulation 156<br />
56. DTS Degree and Low Self-confidence Cross-tabulation 158<br />
57. DTS Degree and Insecurity Cross-tabulation 160<br />
58. DTS Degree and Discontentment <strong>with</strong> Singleness Cross-tabulation 162<br />
59. DTS Degree and Difficulty Handling Stress Cross-tabulation 163<br />
60. DTS Degree and Comparison to Other Women Cross-tabulation 165<br />
61. DTS Degree and Relationships <strong>with</strong> Male Students Cross-tabulation 167<br />
62. DTS Degree and Relationship <strong>with</strong> an Older Woman Cross-tabulation 169<br />
63. DTS Degree and Desire <strong>for</strong> a Female Mentor Cross-tabulation 171<br />
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES<br />
Figure<br />
Page<br />
1. Degree of Need 138<br />
2. Size of Non-academic Need 144<br />
3. Speaker Topics Desired According to Need 145<br />
4. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Depression by Marital Status 148<br />
5. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Depression by Age 148<br />
6. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Loneliness by Marital Status 149<br />
7. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Loneliness by Age 150<br />
8. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Low Self-esteem by Age 151<br />
9. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Low Self-esteem by Marital Status 152<br />
10. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Perfectionism by Marital Status 153<br />
11. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Perfectionism by Age 154<br />
12. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Personal Body Image by Marital Status 155<br />
13. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Personal Body Image by Age 156<br />
14. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Self-confidence by Marital Status 157<br />
15. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Self-confidence by Age 158<br />
16. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Insecurity by Marital Status 159<br />
17. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Insecurity by Age 160<br />
18. Discontentedness <strong>with</strong> Singleness by Age 161<br />
19. Difficulty Handling Stress by Marital Status 162<br />
20. Difficulty Handling Stress by Age 163<br />
xiv
21. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Comparing Self to Other Women by Marital Status 164<br />
22. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Comparing Self to Other Women by Age 165<br />
23. Difficulty <strong>with</strong> Relationships <strong>with</strong> Male Students by Marital Status 166<br />
24. Difficulty <strong>with</strong> Relationships <strong>with</strong> Male Students by Age 167<br />
25. Current Relationship <strong>with</strong> an Older Christian Woman by Age 168<br />
26. Current Relationship <strong>with</strong> an Older Christian Woman by Marital Status 169<br />
27. Desire <strong>for</strong> a Female Mentor by Marital Status 170<br />
28. Desire <strong>for</strong> a Female Mentor by Age 171<br />
xv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
Mentors and mature older women in my life have had a huge impact on me,<br />
my personal life, and my professional development. It wasn’t until I became a Christian<br />
later in life that I realized that Christian community, relationships, and the wisdom of<br />
brothers and sisters in Christ further along in the faith journey would be the fundamental<br />
value that I would be called to fulfill in my own life. Life on this earth can be difficult.<br />
And when it is, we need other Christians to come alongside and encourage us <strong>with</strong> hope,<br />
faith, and love to continue the path that the Lord has called us to walk. And it is to that<br />
end that I acknowledge those who have helped me to complete this D.Min. project, <strong>for</strong> I<br />
could not have done it <strong>with</strong>out their help, expertise, and encouragement.<br />
These faithful brothers and sisters in Christ were long-suffering friends and<br />
family who came alongside me and were mentors, encouragers, providers of expertise<br />
and in<strong>for</strong>mation, and prayer warriors. Dr. Jerry Wof<strong>for</strong>d, Dr. John Reed, along <strong>with</strong> my<br />
two readers, Dr. Joye Baker and Dr. Linda Marten assisted me in visioning this project,<br />
provided permission and guidance <strong>for</strong> designing the survey instrument, and <strong>for</strong> producing<br />
the final product. Jeanne Ballard, Tamra Barbieri, Eva Bleeker, Karen Clay, Vickie<br />
Gregg, Lacie Habekott, Rose Henness, Paige King, Agnes Leung, Markene Meyers, Janet<br />
Pope, and Lisa Yunker were the faithful women students who participated in the pilot<br />
study, offering helpful insights, changes, and recommendations <strong>for</strong> the final development<br />
of the survey. The DTS Office of the Registrar provided the address labels <strong>for</strong> the mailing<br />
list, Terri Justice executed the printing and collating of the survey, and the DTS Postal<br />
Office and its staff helped immensely <strong>with</strong> the mailing and receiving of the surveys. Dr.<br />
Gene Pond, Director of Institutional Research and Effectiveness and Mark Howell,<br />
Assistant Director <strong>for</strong> Institutional Research provided hours of gracious counsel and<br />
professional designing of the charts, graphs and figures essential to the assessment of the<br />
research data and its communication in the actual dissertation. I also want to<br />
xvi
acknowledge the wonderful help and provision of patient skill provided by Michelle Bly-<br />
Shetter to get the pagination successfully done and Jenae Wyrtzen Edwards <strong>for</strong> her<br />
excellence in the professional <strong>editing</strong> and printing of this dissertation.<br />
The writing of this dissertation was done under the loving and professional<br />
guidance of my two readers, Dr. Joye Baker and Dr. Linda Marten, who put in hours and<br />
hours of loving and dedicated time reading, suggesting changes, <strong>editing</strong>, and offering<br />
encouraging comments. Months and years of prayer were provided as encouragement and<br />
support by many of my DTS colleagues as well as by many of my friends in Rockwall,<br />
Texas, and most especially by my husband, Mike, and my family, Jeff and Erika<br />
Manning, and Molly and Jon Rutty. These loved ones also persevered and sacrificed<br />
alongside <strong>with</strong> me and <strong>for</strong> me so that I could complete this project.<br />
This D.Min. project was conceived out of the passionate desire to serve the<br />
women students of DTS more effectively, personally, and thoroughly as I serve in the<br />
role of Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students. I am grateful to all the women students who<br />
participated in this research and provided a completed survey in response to my<br />
questions. It is because of their honest input and vulnerable sharing of their personal<br />
needs and issues <strong>with</strong> which they struggle that this dissertation was possible. It is my<br />
prayer that they will benefit from what we have learned as a result of this research and<br />
that they will leave DTS as graduates who have been well prepared in all aspects of their<br />
personal lives as well as academic scholarship to serve the Lord “<strong>with</strong> all their hearts,<br />
minds, souls, and strength” as they go into all the world in ministry. It is also my hope<br />
that this research will not only assist me in ministry and service to the DTS women<br />
students but also that it will help those who will follow after me in the role of Advisor <strong>for</strong><br />
Women Students.<br />
xvii
CHAPTER 1<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Importance of the Study<br />
The female seminarian represents a fairly recent phenomenon in the life and<br />
ministry of <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary (DTS). Women joined the DTS student body in<br />
1975 <strong>with</strong> approximately 1500 women graduates as of 2008. These women trained and<br />
prepared <strong>for</strong> ministry through biblical and theological study to fulfill the mission of<br />
<strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary “to glorify God by equipping godly servant leaders.” 1 As of the date of<br />
this dissertation, no specific research has addressed the personal needs and issues of the<br />
female students. In the past, studies were conducted related to the DTS women alumnae 2<br />
and the wives of DTS students. 3 In 1977, three women graduated from DTS. Ten years<br />
later, in 1987, twenty-eight women graduated. By1997, the number of women graduating<br />
from DTS was <strong>for</strong>ty-six. In 2007, ninety-five women graduated <strong>with</strong> DTS degrees and in<br />
2008, one-hundred twelve women graduated <strong>with</strong> DTS degrees. With the increasing<br />
numbers of women attending and graduating from <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary, the issues and needs<br />
of female students have increased proportionately each year. Literature and resources<br />
2008), 6.<br />
1 <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary Catalog (<strong>Dallas</strong>, TX: <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary, 2007-<br />
2 Joye B. Baker, “An Analysis of the Leadership Challenges Facing the <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological<br />
Seminary Women Alumnae” (D.Min. diss., <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary, 2005).<br />
3 Jeannette M. Entz Shubert. “An Evaluation of the Seminary Wives In Ministry Program at<br />
<strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary” (D.Min. diss., <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary, 2001).<br />
1
2 <br />
exist which address the personal needs and issues of women. However, there is limited<br />
research specifically related to <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary female seminarians.<br />
This study sought to identify and assess the personal needs and issues of the<br />
<strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary twenty-first century female students. As part of this<br />
research, a specifically designed survey was used to discover the personal needs and<br />
issues of the women students. The data from the survey will help strengthen and enhance<br />
the programming, leadership training, and pastoral care provided by the Advisor <strong>for</strong><br />
Women Students. Beyond the application useful to <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary, this research could<br />
also be a benefit to women in other seminaries as well as women in churches since the<br />
DTS female students represent a cross-section of Christian women.<br />
As the Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students at DTS, I chose this research focus<br />
because I have the responsibility to provide pastoral care, guidance, and resources <strong>for</strong> the<br />
women students. A large part of my role includes meeting <strong>with</strong> every female student<br />
personally and to regularly meet <strong>with</strong> students desiring an on-going, deeper mentoring<br />
relationship. I have served in this role since 2004, and I believe that this study provides<br />
me <strong>with</strong> the in<strong>for</strong>mation needed to better adjust, design, plan, and implement<br />
programming and resources <strong>for</strong> the women students.<br />
One responsibility of the Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students is to oversee the<br />
Women Students’ Fellowship (WSF) and to train and guide the WSF student leadership.<br />
This student organization provides a training environment <strong>for</strong> women leaders as they plan<br />
and execute different programs, retreats, and seminars. These events connect the women<br />
<strong>with</strong> one another, provide an opportunity to meet some of the relational needs of the<br />
women students, and help in their preparation <strong>for</strong> future ministry to others. As the<br />
Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students, I regularly mentor those who serve in positions on the<br />
WSF Leadership Team and help identify and address some of their own personal and<br />
relational issues.
3 <br />
The in<strong>for</strong>mation gained through this research will also in<strong>for</strong>m the DTS faculty<br />
and staff regarding curriculum, training needs, counseling, and support services <strong>for</strong> the<br />
female students. Beyond the application useful to <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary, women in similar<br />
roles at other seminaries might find this in<strong>for</strong>mation helpful as they guide, counsel, and<br />
plan pertinent programming and courses <strong>for</strong> their female students. Additionally, the data<br />
from this research could also be very helpful in training, leading, and ministering to<br />
women in local churches.<br />
Rationale <strong>for</strong> the Study<br />
Titus 2 offers a biblical mandate <strong>for</strong> older, more spiritually mature women to<br />
care <strong>for</strong> the needs of younger women. The Apostle Paul instructs Christian women to<br />
teach and train other women to live godly lives. Paul states in Titus 2: 1-5:<br />
But as <strong>for</strong> you, speak the things which are fitting <strong>for</strong> sound doctrine. Older<br />
men are to be temperate, dignified, sensible, sound in faith, in love, in<br />
perseverance. Older women, likewise are to be reverent in their behavior, not<br />
malicious gossips, nor enslaved to much wine, teaching what is good, that they<br />
may encourage the young women to love their husbands, to love their children, to<br />
be sensible, pure workers at home, kind, being subject to their own husbands, that<br />
the word of God may not be dishonored (Titus 2:1-5).<br />
Paul exhorts older men regarding their behaviors, attitudes, and faith. He then<br />
transitions in his instruction to Titus and specifically includes and addresses the older<br />
women by saying, “Likewise…” This indicates that the older women should manifest the<br />
same requirements as the older men in their behavior, character, and leadership as well as<br />
attend to the specific instruction of teaching what is good, and being influencers, models,<br />
teachers, and mentors <strong>for</strong> the younger women. Paul attempts to communicate that<br />
believing women should have the same personal characteristics and responsibilities<br />
towards younger women as the male leaders have towards younger men. This mandate<br />
surfaces the need <strong>for</strong> older women of the faith to develop relationships <strong>with</strong> younger, less
4 <br />
spiritually mature believing women, in order to mentor them, and encourage and guide<br />
them in the process of their Christian growth and maturity.<br />
Definition of Terms<br />
The following terms will be used throughout this dissertation. It is important<br />
<strong>for</strong> these terms to be clearly defined and explained in order to understand the research<br />
presented in the Literature Review.<br />
Mentoring<br />
The term mentor actually comes from the world of Greek mythology. The<br />
original Mentor appears as an old and trusted friend of Odysseus. Odysseus put his son,<br />
Telemachus, under the tutelage and care of this wise sage named Mentor. At the time of<br />
the Trojan War, Telemachus spent his time away fighting, so Mentor held the<br />
responsibility to teach his young student “not only in book learning but also in the wiles<br />
of the world.” 4<br />
Mentor serves as a wise guide to young Telemachus in his search <strong>for</strong><br />
reunion <strong>with</strong> his father after the end of the War. Mentor urges the boy on his quests.<br />
Mentor’s responsibility was to provide an education of soul and spirit, as well as mind,<br />
and an education in wisdom and not merely in in<strong>for</strong>mation. Mentor’s part in the story is<br />
instructive, helping the young man achieve his manhood and confirm his identity in an<br />
adult world while helping the father complete his life’s work. 5<br />
Many terms across the years have been used <strong>for</strong> the concept of the mentoring<br />
relationship. The ministry of a mentor begins <strong>with</strong> humility and trust, as the primary task<br />
involves listening and not telling another what to do. It includes imparting wisdom and<br />
insight into what the mentoree experiences. A mentor helps a mentoree begin to have a<br />
4 Philip Babcock Gove, ed., Webster’s Third International Dictionary (Springfield, MA: G. &<br />
C. Merriam, 1981), 1412.<br />
5 Laurent A. Daloz. Mentor: Guiding the Journey of Adult Learners (San Francisco: Jossey-<br />
Bass Inc., Publishers, 1999), 20.
5 <br />
perspective of her life as a whole, as a Christian, and to recognize God’s activity<br />
throughout all of her life experiences. Mentoring requires the gift of time … time to<br />
listen, time to care, and time to commit to be <strong>with</strong> another person in reflective thought.<br />
“Anyone can mentor, provided he has learned something from God and is willing to<br />
share <strong>with</strong> others what he has learned,” 6 state Stanley and Clinton. “Mentoring is one of<br />
the most influential ways to help us grow into intimacy <strong>with</strong> God, accept our identity as<br />
the beloved of God and discover our unique voices <strong>for</strong> kingdom responsibility.” 7 Esther<br />
Burroughs adds, “A mentor enhances growth in the life of another.” 8<br />
The definition of a mentor <strong>for</strong> the purposes of this study is: One who commits<br />
to come alongside another younger person (either by chronology of age or by number of<br />
semesters enrolled in <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary) in a caring relationship like a shepherd, to<br />
encourage, exhort, reflect, and share insights about seminary, spiritual growth and<br />
integrity, life experiences and related subjects. The mentor should also listen to the<br />
mentoree’s personal struggles, doubts, difficulties, ways of living and relating to God and<br />
others to help discover anything that might be hindering her walk of faith and full<br />
commitment to God.<br />
Spiritual Mentoring<br />
Addressing the subjects of spirituality, spiritual friends, guides, and direction,<br />
David Benner explains, “…spiritual direction is…often referred to by such terms as<br />
mentoring, discipleship, or spiritual guidance (these all describing slightly different but<br />
6 Paul D. Stanley and J. Robert Clinton. Connecting: The Mentoring Relationships You Need<br />
to Succeed in Life (Colorado Springs: NavPress, 1992), 29.<br />
7 Keith R. Anderson and Randy D. Reese, Spiritual Mentoring (Downers Grove, IL:<br />
InterVarsity Press, 1999), 36-37.<br />
1997), 60.<br />
8 Esther Burroughs, A Garden Path to Mentoring (Birmingham, AL: New Hope Publishers,
6 <br />
closely related <strong>for</strong>ms of relationship).” 9 Benner further expresses the differences he sees<br />
saying,<br />
The essence of Christian spirituality is following Christ on a journey<br />
of personal trans<strong>for</strong>mation.…Christian spirituality involves working out<br />
our existence <strong>with</strong>in the context of the Christian faith and community.<br />
More precisely, it is the deep relationship <strong>with</strong> God that exists when the<br />
human spirit is grounded in God’s Spirit. Spirituality is not Christian if it<br />
is not centered in the Spirit.…Spiritual friends nurture the development of<br />
each other’s soul…desiring that the other become all that he or she was<br />
intended to be….It is the gift of themselves and their companionship on<br />
the trans<strong>for</strong>mational journey of Christian spirituality.…Christian direction<br />
is the second <strong>for</strong>m of soul friendship.…Spiritual direction is a one-on-one<br />
relationship organized around prayer and conversation directed toward<br />
deepening intimacy <strong>with</strong> God. 10<br />
Spiritual mentoring means encouraging others in their spiritual journey and<br />
maturity. The mentor and mentoree share honestly about the untidiness and chaos of the<br />
real world, discuss how it impacts the challenges of life, and discover encouragement and<br />
hope through their personal relationship <strong>with</strong> Christ. Keith Anderson and Randy Reese<br />
describe this concept as, “holy listening by wholly listening.” 11 Spiritual mentoring<br />
encourages another through carefully listening and helping others “to listen to the story<br />
line in their own lives, ask their own questions, and connect their own stories to The<br />
Story, Jesus’ story.” 12 In addition, Anderson and Reese explain, “…There is a story that<br />
is being written in our lives, a composition that gets written down or painted on the<br />
canvas of our biographies. To see its image clearly, we must learn to pay attention.<br />
Spiritual mentoring is a relationship that helps us pay attention to our stories and to<br />
2002), 17.<br />
9 David G. Benner. Sacred Companions (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press,<br />
10 Ibid., 15<br />
11 Anderson and Reese, Spiritual Mentoring 90.<br />
12 Ibid., 95.
7 <br />
recognize there the already present action of God.” 13 Spiritual mentoring requires<br />
humility, and a mature and well-developed ability to listen and have discernment.<br />
Another way to define mentoring is to say, “To mentor is to hold up a mirror<br />
<strong>for</strong> reflection. What is reflected is what inhabits the life of the mentoree, not the brilliance<br />
of the mentor.” 14 Since students attend <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary to further their Christian<br />
education and perhaps also pursue a Christian vocation, the spiritual aspect, or spiritual<br />
mentoring, stands as an integral part of the mentoring relationship <strong>for</strong> the purposes of this<br />
research and study.<br />
When defining spiritual mentoring, the synonymous term spiritual direction is<br />
often used. Chaplain (LTC) Michael W. Dugal states that his definition is derived from a<br />
biblical and Christian perspective saying: “Spiritual direction is a continual <strong>for</strong>mative<br />
process in which a Christian believer receives guidance enabling them to faithfully<br />
respond to the Holy Spirit’s constant work of grace toward the attainment of<br />
Christlikeness. (Gal 6:1; Eph 4:11-13; 2 Tim 1:6-9, 13-14; 2:1, 15, 22-26; 3:14-17; 4:2-5;<br />
Titus 2:1-8).” 15 The Upper Room Dictionary of Christian Spiritual Formation contains an<br />
entry <strong>for</strong> spiritual direction. It defines spiritual direction as “the practice of aiding another<br />
to mature and be <strong>for</strong>med in the Christian life.” 16 Spiritual direction represents a<br />
foundational aspect of any mentoring relationship.<br />
Paul Stanley and J. Robert Clinton add this insight to the Spiritual Guidementor<br />
concept saying, “Spiritual Guide-mentoring is reflective intensive. A Spiritual<br />
13 Ibid., 40.<br />
14 Ibid., 56.<br />
15 Chaplain (LTC) Michael W. Dugal. “Spiritual Direction: A Deliberate Response <strong>for</strong> Taking<br />
Spiritual Leadership to the Next Level,” The Army Chaplaincy Professional Bulletin of the Unit Ministry<br />
Team, (Chaplain (COL) David A. Kenehan, Editor-in-Chief, Winter-Spring, 2006), 12.<br />
16 Keith Beasley-Topliffe, ed., The Upper Room Dictionary of Christian Spiritual Formation<br />
(Nashville: Upper Room Books, 2003), 81.
8 <br />
Guide will move you on to interdependence, which implies a healthy independence <strong>with</strong><br />
mutual dependence <strong>for</strong> greater growth and ministry as a part of the Body of Christ.” 17 In<br />
their book Connecting, the authors describe the functions of a Spiritual Guide-mentor,<br />
emphasizing the following aspects in the mentoring relationship: “…help believers assess<br />
their own development; point out areas of strength and weakness in spirituality; help<br />
believers identify needs and take initiative <strong>for</strong> change and growth; provide perspectives<br />
on how to develop growth and depth; and provide accountability <strong>for</strong> spiritual maturity.” 18<br />
The presence of Christ is to be manifested, evidenced and experienced in the presence of<br />
a believer. This is a valuable gift, as well as a great privilege which Christians can offer<br />
to one another through the mentoring relationship.<br />
Susan Hunt coined the term spiritual mothering 19 to describe the mentoring<br />
relationship between Christians. Hunt states, “My working definition <strong>for</strong> the spiritual<br />
mothering relationship is this: When a woman possessing faith and spiritual maturity<br />
enters into a nurturing relationship <strong>with</strong> a younger woman in order to encourage and<br />
equip her to live <strong>for</strong> God’s glory.” 20 Hunt also makes the important clarification to this<br />
concept saying, “Please note that giving birth biologically or being of a certain<br />
chronological age are not prerequisites <strong>for</strong> spiritual mothering.” 21 Sharon W. Betters<br />
contributes to the concept of Christian women nurturing women, or spiritual mentoring<br />
by saying, “Biblical encouragement is soul work.…God uses us – His children – to do<br />
17 Stanley and Clinton. Connecting: The Mentoring Relationships You Need to Succeed in<br />
Life. (Colorado Springs, CO: NavPress, 1992), 66.<br />
18 Ibid., 67.<br />
19 Susan Hunt, Spiritual Mothering (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 1992), 12.<br />
20 Ibid., 12.<br />
21 Ibid., 12.
9 <br />
soul work…by giving to others the treasure of His encouragement, thus becoming God’s<br />
promise keepers.” 22<br />
Discipleship<br />
Discipleship should be interwoven into any Christian relationship. “The Greek<br />
word <strong>for</strong> disciple – mathetes – means learner, pupil, someone who learns by following.<br />
The word implies an intellectual process that directly affects the lifestyle of a person. It is<br />
used in the New Testament primarily of the Twelve. Whatever making a disciple means,<br />
Jesus himself did it. Whatever a disciple is, that’s what the Twelve were.” 23 Discipleship<br />
can be a specific relationship or it can be a program or ministry devoted to the single<br />
purpose of discipling or teaching another the principles and concepts of the Christian<br />
faith. Win Arn and Charles Arn, authors of The Master’s Plan <strong>for</strong> Making Disciples,<br />
answer the question, “What is a Disciple?” by saying, “A disciple is a believer. A disciple<br />
is a follower. A disciple is a learner. A disciple is a witness. A disciple is baptized. A<br />
disciple is a reproducer.” 24 Arn and Arn go on to define discipleship as, “…disciplemaking:<br />
an intentional strategy and priority of the church that initiates disciple-making,<br />
trains members in disciple-making, uses resources of the body, creates support resources,<br />
and incorporates <strong>new</strong> believers into the church.” 25 Stanley and Clinton in their book<br />
Connecting, add this insight to a distinction of discipleship saying, “Discipling is training<br />
intensive.” 26<br />
22 Sharon W. Betters, Treasures of Encouragement (Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing<br />
Company, 1996), 9-11.<br />
23 Bill Hull, Jesus Christ, Disciplemaker, (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2004), 24.<br />
24 Win Arn and Charles Arn, The Master’s Plan <strong>for</strong> Making Disciples, (Grand Rapids, MI:<br />
Baker Books, 1998), 27.<br />
25 Ibid., 122.<br />
26 Stanley and Clinton, Connecting, 66.
10 <br />
A. B. Bruce, author of the classic book The Training of the Twelve, describes<br />
disciples and discipling, saying of Jesus, “…the great Founder of the faith desired not<br />
only to have disciples, but to have about Him men whom He might train to make<br />
disciples of others: to cast the net of divine truth into the sea of the world, and to land on<br />
the shores of the divine kingdom a great multitude of believing souls.” 27 Robert E.<br />
Coleman emphasizes the importance of discipleship and discipling when he clearly states,<br />
“Discipling men and women is the priority around which our lives should be oriented.” 28<br />
Quoting the biblical account by Matthew, Coleman explains,<br />
Matthew’s account sums it up: ‘Go ye there<strong>for</strong>e, and make disciples of all the<br />
nations, baptizing them into the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy<br />
Spirit: teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I commanded you…’<br />
(Matt 28:19, 20, ASV). Significantly, in the original text, ‘go,’ ‘baptizing,’ and<br />
‘teaching’ are participles. This means that these responsibilities derive their<br />
direction from the leading verb, ‘make disciples,’ or as it might be translated,<br />
‘make learners of Christ.’ 29<br />
The word disciple designates a learner or follower, as in the sense of an<br />
apprentice, and in The Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, it is further<br />
explained that the word disciple, “…always implies the existence of a personal<br />
attachment which shapes the whole of life of the one described. 30 Stanley and Clinton<br />
summarize the relationship of discipling and mentoring by saying, “As a follower of<br />
Christ, you can mentor others. Whatever God has given you that has enabled you to grow<br />
and deepen your relationship <strong>with</strong> Him, you can pass on to others. Introducing young<br />
followers of Christ to the basics of spiritual growth is part of the process of discipling,<br />
13.<br />
27 A. B. Bruce, The Training of the Twelve (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 1988),<br />
Revell, 1998), 9.<br />
28 Robert E. Coleman, The Master Plan of Discipleship (Grand Rapids, MI: Fleming H.<br />
29 Ibid., 9.<br />
30 Gerhard Kettel, ed., Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, trans. and ed. Geoffrey<br />
W. Bromiley, vol. 4 (Grand Rapids: MI: Eerdmans, 1967), 441.
11 <br />
which is the first and most basic mentoring type.” 31 Though a disciple, discipleship,<br />
disciple-making, or discipling can be structured in the specific ways described above, the<br />
purpose of this study is a focus on mentoring, and discipleship remains only one in<strong>for</strong>mal<br />
dimension of the mentoring relationship.<br />
Shepherding<br />
Shepherding speaks of pastoral care modeled <strong>for</strong> every believer by the Master<br />
Shepherd, Jesus. Addressing women specifically, as women are instructed in Titus 2, Bev<br />
Hislop has coined a definition <strong>for</strong> women shepherding women which reflects the focus of<br />
this study. She explains, “The greatest distinction of a shepherd is that she is a woman<br />
who intentionally provides the com<strong>for</strong>t and understanding that fosters healing and<br />
growth.” 32 Phillip Keller states,<br />
‘Sheep do not just take care of themselves’ as some might suppose. They<br />
require more than any other class of livestock, endless attention and meticulous<br />
care. It is no accident that God has chosen to call us sheep. The behavior of sheep<br />
and human beings is similar in many ways… Our mass mind (or mob instincts),<br />
our fears and timidity, our stubbornness and stupidity, our perverse habits are all<br />
parallels of profound importance. 33<br />
The imagery of shepherding is found throughout the Scriptures as is the concept of the<br />
“Good Shepherd,” (Psalm 23 and John 16) <strong>for</strong> Jesus is the perfect model of a shepherd<br />
shepherding His sheep.<br />
Pastoral Care & Pastoral Ministry<br />
In light of Titus 2, pastoral care can be defined as responding to another in<br />
their life situation <strong>with</strong> compassion, care, and wisdom. The need <strong>for</strong> intimacy and to<br />
31 Stanley and Clinton, Connecting, 29.<br />
31.<br />
32 Beverly White Hislop, Shepherding a Woman’s Heart. (Chicago: Moody Publishers, 2003),<br />
33 Phillip Keller, A Shepherd Looks at The Twenty-Third Psalm (Grand Rapids, MI:Zondervan<br />
Publishing House, 1970), 20 – 21.
12 <br />
know and be known remains as one of the fundamental desires of the human heart. We<br />
long to be deeply connected to others. As revealed in this study, the needs and issues of<br />
women necessitate the pastoral care of women by women. Even though women attend<br />
seminary, they are not exempt from the emotional pains from their past nor from the<br />
emotional pains that have come <strong>with</strong> societal and educational privileges. The mandate in<br />
Titus 2 implies a type of pastoral care women need from other women to address issues<br />
of life and the challenges of the seminary experience.<br />
Pastoral ministry does not refer to the role of the minister of a church. Since as<br />
believers, we all belong to “the priesthood of believers,” (1 Peter 2: 4-‐5 NASB) believers<br />
have responsibility to care <strong>for</strong> the needs of other believers. As the Apostle Paul states,<br />
“Bear one another’s burdens, and thus fulfill the law of Christ.” (Galatians 6:2 (NASB).<br />
Pastoral care and pastoral ministry are closely related to mentoring another believer.<br />
Counseling<br />
Webster defines counseling as: “professional guidance of the individual by<br />
utilizing psychological methods, especially in collecting case history data, using various<br />
techniques of the personal interview, and testing interests and aptitudes.”(Galatians 6:2 <br />
(NASB). Professional counseling is essential and necessary <strong>for</strong> certain situations.<br />
Individuals, where the issues are more complex and the needs beyond the understanding<br />
of the lay person, are referred to professionals. Referrals need to be expediently and<br />
carefully made.<br />
For the purposes of this study, counseling will not refer to trained licensed<br />
professional counselors or professional counseling. As stated in the <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary<br />
Handbook,<br />
Counseling is available through the dean of students, student services staff<br />
(Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students, Advisor <strong>for</strong> African-American Students, Advisor<br />
<strong>for</strong> International Students, and the Seminary Chaplain), and the faculty at no cost<br />
to the student. However, there are times when more specialized help is needed. In
13 <br />
that event, the Counseling Services department offers professional, biblical<br />
counseling assistance to Seminary students, staff, faculty, and their immediate<br />
families. Counseling is provided to the Seminary family by the director of<br />
counseling Services and contract therapists <strong>for</strong> a fee per session. If necessary,<br />
financial hardship cases are considered on an individual basis. Occasionally,<br />
situations may require networking <strong>with</strong> other mental health professionals in the<br />
<strong>Dallas</strong> community. The Counseling Services department works <strong>with</strong> the client to<br />
find the best care possible if referrals are needed. 34<br />
However, in any relationship where sharing of life experiences, struggles, challenges, and<br />
emotional burdens are expressed, a certain degree of reaching out to the other using<br />
scriptural truth and spiritual encouragement is a certain type of lay counseling. The<br />
sharing of wisdom, scriptural truth, experience, spiritual encouragement and compassion<br />
is the definition of the “counseling” used in a mentoring situation <strong>for</strong> this study.<br />
Women As Mentors<br />
The New Testament teaches that God calls all Christians to minister to one<br />
another. Believers are to serve using their gifts and talents to edify, encourage, equip, and<br />
build up the Body of Christ in unity (Eph 4:11-14). God created the man and the woman<br />
equally in His image (Gen 1:26-27). Titus 2 makes some distinctions between men and<br />
women in the area of mentoring. Beverly Hislop makes an important observation about<br />
women and their God-given nature and their nurturing abilities by asking:<br />
Does bearing children solely define a woman? What about single women or<br />
married women <strong>with</strong>out children? Is child-bearing simply a physical, biological<br />
difference between men and women? Or had God so created woman so that every<br />
fiber of her being is made to nurture others? Would it not be consistent <strong>with</strong><br />
God’s character to create a human being <strong>with</strong> the ability to gestate <strong>with</strong> all the<br />
emotional, mental, and spiritual capabilities that are needed to take care of that<br />
life and to prepare that little one <strong>for</strong> interdependent living? Life experiences can<br />
damage or hinder the full development of this nurturing capacity, but the Creator<br />
designed women <strong>with</strong> nurturing abilities as standard equipment. Married or single<br />
– women who bear biological children and women who don’t – are all created<br />
<strong>with</strong> a nurturing heart 35<br />
34 <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary Student Handbook (<strong>Dallas</strong>, TX: <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological<br />
Seminary), 41.<br />
35 Beverly Hislop, Shepherding A Woman’s Heart, 43.
14 <br />
Women are created in the image of God to be nurturers of others. Hislop<br />
emphasizes this nurturing and mentoring by women <strong>with</strong> women when she states, “The<br />
nurturing nature the Creator gave women fits beautifully <strong>with</strong> the spirit and body,<br />
enabling women to encourage others, to bring health and beauty to relationships on<br />
earth.” 36<br />
Research Question and Anticipated Results<br />
This study asked and answered the question, “What are the personal needs and<br />
issues of the <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary 21 st Century female students?” The following<br />
hypotheses were <strong>for</strong>med prior to the research process:<br />
1. Needs and issues will differ <strong>for</strong> <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary female<br />
students based on the demographic factors of younger and older students,<br />
single and married students, international and non-international students,<br />
and Th.M. and M.A. students.<br />
2. A survey of the <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary female students will reveal<br />
that their greatest personal issues will be in the area of depression,<br />
loneliness, stress, anxiety, and perfectionism.<br />
3. A survey of the <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary female students will reveal a<br />
struggle <strong>with</strong> the issues of self-image, self-acceptance, and self-confidence.<br />
4. A survey of the <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary female students will indicate<br />
a strong desire and need <strong>for</strong> mentoring relationships <strong>with</strong> older, more<br />
spiritually mature women.<br />
5. A survey of the <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary female students will reveal<br />
one of their greatest needs is <strong>for</strong> close meaningful relationships <strong>with</strong> men<br />
and women.<br />
36 Ibid., 44.
15 <br />
Research Design of the Study<br />
A descriptive survey, designed to discover the personal needs and issues of<br />
the <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary female students, served as the research instrument <strong>for</strong><br />
this study. The first draft became a pilot survey sent out to twelve female students in<br />
December 2007. These women represented different ages, degree plans, number of years<br />
at <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary, ethnicities, and marital status. The pilot survey asked <strong>for</strong> their input<br />
on the amount of time it took to take the survey, evaluation of the effectiveness and<br />
thoroughness of the questions, and personal recommendations. All twelve women<br />
returned their surveys <strong>with</strong>in one week. Based on the feedback, a few questions were<br />
eliminated, a few were added, and a few were reworded <strong>for</strong> clarity.<br />
In January 2008, the official survey was mailed to the 600 current <strong>Dallas</strong><br />
Seminary female students. These included women students taking courses on the <strong>Dallas</strong><br />
campus, at all five of the <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary extension sites, and all on-line women<br />
students. Two hundred and ninety-eight (298) surveys (49.6%) were received back from<br />
the women students by the March 2008 deadline. The survey was designed to collect<br />
demographic in<strong>for</strong>mation, to assess current personal issues and needs of the female<br />
students, to discover the relevant topics to use in programming events and speakers, and<br />
to gain any specific recommendations from the women students. This dissertation<br />
includes a summary of the data collected from the survey to help strengthen the training<br />
of women students at <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary. The results of this project were sent to Dr. Mark<br />
Bailey, President of <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary, Dr. Robert Garippa, Vice-President and Dean of<br />
Students, and Rose Henness, the 2008-2009 Women Students’ Fellowship Leadership<br />
Team Leader and Intern <strong>for</strong> developing the Hesed Sister Ministry.
16 <br />
Limitations<br />
The <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary Registrar’s Department supplied the list of addresses<br />
used to mail the survey to the women students. Thirty-three surveys were returned to<br />
sender and never received by the addressee. Two students returned their survey <strong>with</strong>out<br />
giving responses to the questions. The first student stated that she had graduated and she<br />
did not think that she qualified <strong>for</strong> the survey and chose not to fill it out. The second<br />
student criticized the survey and chose not to fill it out. Two students returned their<br />
surveys <strong>with</strong> responses but had overlooked answering a page of questions. These two<br />
surveys are included in the count of valid surveys since the respondents answered the<br />
majority of the questions. The final number of surveys used <strong>for</strong> this study totaled 565. Of<br />
these mailed, women students returned 296 valid surveys, which produced a response rate<br />
of 52.4% <strong>for</strong> the study.<br />
Preview of Remaining Chapters<br />
Chapter Two presents previous research and a literature review. It includes<br />
the biblical-theological basis of the study from the primary New Testament passage Titus<br />
2:3-5, and from the Old Testament passage, Gen 1:26-28, along <strong>with</strong> other selected Old<br />
and New Testament passages. The Literature Review addresses two specific issues:<br />
(1) the need <strong>for</strong> mentoring and training from older or more spiritually mature women to<br />
younger women, and (2) an overview of the needs and issues of today’s twenty-first<br />
century woman, and most specifically, females in higher education and seminary.<br />
Chapter Three describes the procedure and research method. Details of the<br />
process of designing the descriptive survey and the execution of the instrument,<br />
description of the female population at <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary, correlation of hypotheses and<br />
survey questions and the procedures <strong>for</strong> collecting and analyzing the data are reported.<br />
Chapter Four details the results of the study. The responses to the survey<br />
questions are presented according to the following categories: (1) demographics,
17 <br />
(2) personal issues, (3) personal needs, and (4) topics <strong>for</strong> seminars, speakers, and<br />
programming. The data reflects the findings of the research and correlations relate to each<br />
of the hypotheses.<br />
Chapter Five summarizes the results of the study, draws conclusions, and<br />
makes recommendations. Suggestions are given <strong>for</strong> future additional research and the<br />
implications of this study.
CHAPTER 2<br />
PREVIOUS RESEARCH AND LITERATURE OVERVIEW<br />
Biblical -Theological Basis of the Study<br />
This study sought to identify the needs and issues of women seminarians and<br />
the need <strong>for</strong> mentoring of women by women, and specifically the women students of<br />
<strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary. The research associated <strong>with</strong> this study addresses two related topics:<br />
(1) the need <strong>for</strong> women mentoring women, and (2) the specific personal and emotional<br />
needs and issues of women seminarians. Titus 2:3-5 provides the fundamental and<br />
foundational scripture <strong>for</strong> the biblical-theological basis of this project.<br />
The Apostle Paul wrote the Epistle to Titus, the young man commissioned by<br />
Paul to establish the church at Crete. Paul calls Titus “my true son,” indicating perhaps<br />
that Paul was the one responsible <strong>for</strong> Titus’ conversion. Or the description, “my true son”<br />
may indicate a mentor-protégé relationship, or it may refer to both meanings. Paul<br />
probably wrote Titus after he wrote 1 Timothy (see Titus 3:12; 1 Tim. 3:14) and be<strong>for</strong>e<br />
he wrote 2 Timothy, his last inspired epistle. 37 Paul’s epistle to Titus stands as one of the<br />
triad of New Testament epistles known as the pastoral epistles. This title was first given<br />
to 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy and Titus by P. Anton in 1726. 38 In this letter to Titus, Paul<br />
37 Mark Bailey and Tom Constable, “Titus,” in Nelson’s New Testament Survey, eds. Charles<br />
R. Swindoll and Roy B. Zuck, (Nashville, TN: Word Publishing, 1999), 489-495.<br />
& T. Clark, 1924), xiii.<br />
2 Walter Lock, The Pastoral Epistles in The International Critical Commentary (Edinburgh: T.<br />
18
19 <br />
reiterates his previous instructions to Titus whom he had left behind on the island of<br />
Crete to provide leadership <strong>for</strong> the fledgling Cretan church. The brevity of Paul’s visit to<br />
Crete necessitated this letter since the organization of the Cretan church was unfinished. 39<br />
Paul was familiar <strong>with</strong> the Cretan churches and k<strong>new</strong> the Cretans believers faced<br />
different challenges from other first century workers. Titus needed to receive specific<br />
instructions to apply to the unique situation of the Cretan churches. Crete had once been<br />
the center of Western civilization. R.W. Hutchinson offers this in<strong>for</strong>mation:<br />
The long mountainous island of Crete <strong>for</strong>ms a natural stepping stone between<br />
Europe and Africa, and between Europe and Asia, but whereas there are many<br />
stepping stones <strong>for</strong> the latter interval, Crete is the only convenient link between<br />
Europe and Egypt. It was no accident there<strong>for</strong>e, that this island became the<br />
medium <strong>for</strong> the transmission of cultural influences <strong>for</strong>, the older civilizations of<br />
the Near and Middle East to barbarian Europe, and that the first civilization that<br />
we can term European was that of Crete. 40<br />
Scholars, Mark Bailey and Thomas Constable, in their commentary on Titus, state:<br />
The Cretans had a reputation <strong>for</strong> being idle and corrupt (1:12), and the<br />
churches there were unorganized. These traits apparently characterized some of<br />
the believers as well as the false teachers. Part of Titus’ task consisted of<br />
motivating them to change….and dealing <strong>with</strong> false teachers (1:10-11).” 41<br />
Commentator and biblical historian, Edward P. Blair, states this about Paul’s letter to<br />
Titus:<br />
This brief letter is full of charm and help <strong>for</strong> effective Christian living. An old<br />
Apostle (Paul) is writing to a son in the gospel to assist him in carrying out his<br />
mission in a tough spot (Crete). The son (Titus) was living among people who<br />
were notorious as ‘liars, evil beasts, lazy gluttons.’ The nature of the counsel<br />
offered him indicates that the church members there were undisciplined in<br />
personal habits, quarrelsome, insubordinate, and indolent in their Christian<br />
service. Their way of life was not markedly different from that of their heathen<br />
neighbors. And false teachers were destroying whatever foundations of Christian<br />
39 John F. Walvoord and Roy B. Zuck, eds., “Titus 1:5,” The Bible Knowledge Commentary,<br />
Old Testament (Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1985), 761-62.<br />
40 R. W. Hutchinson, Prehistoric Crete. (Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books, 1962), 31.<br />
41 Bailey and Constable, “Titus,” in Nelson’s New Testament Survey, 489-90.
20 <br />
understanding and living that had been laid down when they had first been<br />
evangelized. 42<br />
Under the legendary leadership of King Minos, who had ruled all of Europe, the<br />
civilization of Crete was at its lowest point during the days of the Roman Empire when<br />
Titus labored there. Hutchinson also explains:<br />
The island of Crete was prosperous certainly in a humdrum way under the<br />
Roman Empire, but its inhabitants lived in a backwater, playing no great part in<br />
the more stirring events of the time…[It] reached its final period of degradation<br />
just be<strong>for</strong>e the Roman occupation, when it became the headquarters of the pirates<br />
in the Mediterranean. 43<br />
This epistle deals particularly <strong>with</strong> the order of the local church, and the<br />
dominant theme is exemplary Christian behavior <strong>for</strong> the sake of outsiders. 44 Paul wanted<br />
to present clear principles to follow in order to properly establish the church in Crete. His<br />
instructions to Titus intended to equip and direct Titus to deal <strong>with</strong> a decadent society<br />
which was prone toward disorganization, disunity and deceitfulness. 45 In his thesis on<br />
Titus, Albert W. Mitchell adds, “The overriding task given to Titus was to set in order the<br />
things lacking in Crete. It is evident from the emphasis on good works in this epistle that<br />
Titus was not engaged in evangelism or in church planting but in the structural<br />
organization of the Cretan churches. The churches were apparently divided into factions<br />
and were unable to present a united front against the false teachers.” 46 Paul there<strong>for</strong>e<br />
instructs the Cretan Christians about what Christian behavior and relationships should<br />
42 Edward P. Blair, “Titus,” The Illustrated Bible Handbook (Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press,<br />
1987), 325-26.<br />
43 R. W. Hutchinson, Prehistoric Crete, 31.<br />
44 Bailey and Constable, “Titus,” in Nelson’s New Testament Survey, 490.<br />
45 A. E. Humphreys, The Epistles to Timothy and Titus (Cambridge: The University Press,<br />
1895), 213-14.<br />
46 Albert W. Mitchell, “An Exposition of Paul’s Specific Pastoral Instruction to Titus” (Th.M.<br />
thesis, <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary, 1970), 20.
21 <br />
look like according to sound doctrine. And, he gives a specific instruction to women in<br />
Titus 2:1-5:<br />
But as <strong>for</strong> you, speak the things which are fitting <strong>for</strong> sound doctrine. Older<br />
men are to be temperate, dignified, sensible, sound in faith, in love, in<br />
perseverance. Older women likewise are to be reverent in their behavior, not<br />
malicious gossips, nor enslaved to much wine, teaching what is good, that they<br />
may encourage the young women to love their husbands, to love their children, to<br />
be sensible, pure, workers at home, kind, being subject to their own husbands, that<br />
the word of God may not be dishonored (Titus 2:3-5 (NASB).<br />
In Titus 2:1, Paul instructs Titus to encourage and teach that which reflects<br />
sound doctrine (or “healthy teaching”). 47 The most outstanding result of sound doctrine is<br />
to produce a quality of reverence in behavior. The Cretan Christians were to behave<br />
consistently <strong>with</strong> what they professed to believe. Paul addresses five specific people<br />
groups of believers: (1) older men, (2) older women, (3) younger women, (4) younger<br />
men, and (5) slaves (Titus 2:2-10 (NASB). Paul instructs Titus to teach all of these<br />
groups except the younger women. Paul directs the older women to take responsibility <strong>for</strong><br />
teaching and training the younger women (vv. 4-5). Cary M. Purdue brings a valuable<br />
insight into Paul’s usage of the term “older” in verse 2 when saying,<br />
In a patriarchal-matriarchal society it was natural that older persons should be<br />
instructed first. The older men (presbutas) are not aged men who hold<br />
ecclesiastical positions (see 1 Tim 5:17), but are men old in years (see also 1 Tim<br />
5:1).…The greybeards should have three characteristics which befit all old men<br />
and three which are specifically Christian. The first triad consists of soberness,<br />
dignity, and self-control…has specific reference to a moderate use of wine, but<br />
more generally to moderation in all tastes and habits. Healthy doctrine must have<br />
healthy practice, so a second triad of virtues is enjoined which is especially<br />
related to the Christian life. These are faith, love, and patience…<br />
In verse 3…The adverb likewise points out the close connection <strong>with</strong> what<br />
precedes, so that the older women are compared to the older men. Both must<br />
demonstrate practical virtues and shun evil vices. Age is a relative matter and<br />
there is no way of knowing how old old is or how young young is (see vs. 4, 6).<br />
The word behavior has wide connotations, referring to the attitudes and actions<br />
47 Walvoord and Zuck, “Titus 1:5,” The Bible Knowledge Commentary, Old Testament, 764.
22 <br />
which reflect one’s conduct in all respects and on all occasions. The demeanor of<br />
old women should be reverent. 48<br />
Paul states that these “older women” (gynaikas) had to avoid malicious gossip<br />
(or “not to be slanderers,” diabolous, from diaballo “to slander”; from this verb comes<br />
the noun “devil,” the chief slanderer) of others. These older women (gynaikas) were to be<br />
“worthy of respect” or “reverent in their behavior” (semnous, “serious-minded,” i.e., not<br />
clowns). 49 This quality speaks of women who display a reverence in their daily life<br />
equivalent to the bearing of a temple priestess engaged in sacred duties. 50 They were not<br />
to have a dependence on enslaving substances such as wine (or, “temporate,” nephalious,<br />
“well-balanced”). 51 Walvoord and Zuck comment about this Greek word usage saying,<br />
“Paul used some <strong>for</strong>m of the word here translated ‘self-control’ <strong>with</strong> each of the four<br />
groups of people (vv.2, 4-6). Various <strong>for</strong>ms of the word are prominent in the Pastorals,<br />
indicating <strong>for</strong> all Christians the importance of moderation, sensibleness, and selfrestraint.”<br />
52 Cary Purdue also states that Paul gives “…two prohibitions, the first of<br />
which is a besetting sin of elderly women in general, and the second the besetting sin of<br />
the Cretans in particular. They were not to be slanderers or malicious gossipers.” 53 In his<br />
commentary, Purdue goes on to explain:<br />
The usage of the perfect douloo (enslaved) points out the plight of addiction<br />
and bondage that possessed many Cretan women. There seems to be a connection<br />
between gossip and addiction, <strong>for</strong> in a society where wine was the only beverage,<br />
it would be a natural outcome of wine parties <strong>for</strong> the character of others to be<br />
maligned. But there is something better to do, <strong>for</strong> instead of tearing down<br />
84-85.<br />
764.<br />
48 Cary M. Purdue, 2 Timothy and Titus Explained (Paco, Manila: O.M.F. Publishers, 1975),<br />
49 Walvoord and Zuck, “Titus 1:5,” The Bible Knowledge Commentary, Old Testament, 738,<br />
50 Lock, The Pastoral Epistles in The International Critical Commentary, 140.<br />
51 Walvoord and Zuck, “Titus 1:5,” The Bible Knowledge Commentary, Old Testament, 738.<br />
52 Ibid. 764.<br />
53 Purdue, 2 Timothy and Titus Explained, 85.
23 <br />
character they can build up character. Accordingly, these older women are to be<br />
teachers of noble virtues...both by life and by lip. The context seems to indicate<br />
that their teaching was primarily to be by example, a service which has been<br />
invaluable to the cause of Christ throughout many centuries. 54<br />
In addition, the older women should teach what is good (agathas) 55 by deed as<br />
well as by word. “Personal advice and encouragement, not <strong>for</strong>mal teaching, is in view<br />
here [EBC, E1,GNC, Hn, HNTC, SSA, TC, TNTC, WC]; it is teaching by words and by<br />
example [EGT, IB, NCB, GNC, HNTC, WC], perhaps by example only [MNTC,NCBC],<br />
or more by speech and teaching than by example [Lg, My, SSA]. The good things they<br />
are to teach are specified in the following verses [Bg, SSA, TG].” 56 They were to<br />
encourage the younger women to fulfill their responsibilities.<br />
Author and pastor Robert Lewis describes the relationship that Paul advocates<br />
in Titus 2 in his book The New Eve. Lewis explains,<br />
In Titus 2 the apostle Paul encouraged older, more experienced women to step<br />
<strong>for</strong>ward and help the younger, less mature women learn how to ‘be sensible’<br />
(Titus 2:5). Even first-century women had trouble <strong>with</strong> priorities and saying no.<br />
So Paul exhorted mature women to build <strong>for</strong> these younger women a wise<br />
decision-making grid that includes loving their husbands (being a helper), loving<br />
their children (nurturing a healthy, godly next generation), being sensible (about<br />
what you can and should not do), and making a good home ‘so that the word of<br />
God will not be dishonored’ (Titus 2:5). 57<br />
The younger women needed role models to help them see how to live out<br />
Christian values and beliefs. By requiring the older women to have certain honorable<br />
characteristics, they became the role models, teachers, and mentors <strong>for</strong> the younger<br />
women so that the younger women could learn how to live in a manner distinct from the<br />
54 Ibid.,85-86.<br />
55 Walvoord and Zuck, “Titus 1:5,” The Bible Knowledge Commentary, Old Testament, 764.<br />
56 J. Harold Greenlee, An Exegetical Summary of Titus and Philemon, Th.M. thesis, (<strong>Dallas</strong>,<br />
TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics, Inc., 1989), 53.<br />
57 Robert Lewis, The New Eve (Nashville, TN: B&H Publishing Group, 2008), 82.
24 <br />
culture around them. Paul emphasizes to Titus the critical influence women play in<br />
reflecting God’s Truth. Lenski states,<br />
Paul has more to say regarding the young women than regarding any other<br />
class of members. Why this is the case is indicated by the purpose clause which,<br />
however, extends back also to the old women because they are to be qualified <strong>for</strong><br />
producing all this sober-mindedness in the young women. If the women fail in<br />
what Paul here asks, he fears, ‘lest the word of God be blasphemed,’ ‘lest the<br />
whole gospel be vilified.’ So much depends on the women, in great part on the<br />
young women, of the church. The world will to a great extent judge the churches<br />
by the character which the gospel produces in the women. 58<br />
In her book Mixed Ministry, Dr. Sue Edwards also discusses why Paul gave<br />
the advice to Titus <strong>for</strong> the older women to teach the younger women. Edwards comments,<br />
“We believe Paul understood that older women make better teachers, trainers, mentors,<br />
and models <strong>for</strong> younger women because, as women, they have so much in common. And<br />
Paul wanted his sisters to get the best possible care and instruction.” 59 Older Christian<br />
women also have a lifetime of experiences, both positive and negative, to bring to<br />
relationships <strong>with</strong> younger women. Spiritually mature women can impart wisdom to help<br />
other women grow to honor God in all they say and do.<br />
God’s Word admonishes believers to imitate other believers: “Remember your<br />
leaders, who spoke the word of God to you. Consider the outcome of their way of life and<br />
imitate their faith” (Hebrews 13:7 (NASB). The older women were to teach by their<br />
behavior as well as their words what was good according to sound doctrine. Walvoord<br />
and Zuck give this explanation of “sound doctrine”:<br />
Titus was to teach in the congregation what is in accord <strong>with</strong> sound doctrine,<br />
or more literally, ‘healthy teaching.’ The notion of healthy teaching is common in<br />
the Pastorals (cf. 1Tim1:10; 6:3; 2 Tim1:13; 4:3; Titus 1:9, 13; 2:2). So also is the<br />
58 R. C. H. Lenski, The Interpretation of St. Paul’s Epistles to the Colossians, to the<br />
Thessalonians, to Timothy, to Titus and to Philemon (Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Publishing House,<br />
1937), 912-13.<br />
59 Sue Edwards, Kelley Mathews, and Henry Rogers, Mixed Ministry: Working Together as<br />
Brothers and Sisters in an Oversexed Society (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 2008), 59.
25 <br />
idea that certain behavior befits sound doctrine, and other behavior does not (cf., 1<br />
Tim1:10; 6:3) 60<br />
The biblical mandate in Titus 2:3-5 clearly promotes the woman-to-woman<br />
relationship <strong>for</strong> the purpose of learning a way of living that will glorify God. From the<br />
beginning in Genesis, the Triune God has nurtured His people through His relationship<br />
<strong>with</strong> them and through His Word. He is our model <strong>for</strong> relationships <strong>with</strong> one another.<br />
Jesus, the second person of the Trinity, throughout his time <strong>with</strong> his disciples, modeled<br />
the mentoring relationship as he taught and shared <strong>with</strong> his disciples. He listened to their<br />
personal concerns, dialogued about life and belief, and helped them understand how to<br />
live in a manner that would bring glory to God as they related to others. Paul reflects this<br />
same model of mentoring in the Titus 2 mandate to women.<br />
Examples of mentors fill the pages of Scripture. Mentoring relationships in the<br />
Old Testament include Eli and Samuel (1 Samuel 3), Elijah and Elisha (1 Kings 19:19ff, 2 <br />
Kings 2-‐6), Moses and Joshua (Exodus 24:13, 33:11; Numbers 11:28; Joshua 1:1, 5:24, 24:29),<br />
and Naomi and Ruth, (The Book of Ruth). In the New Testament, mentoring is exemplified<br />
by Jesus and His disciples (Matthew 4:18ff; 8:19-‐22; 16; 28:18-‐20; Mark 1:16ff; 14:18-‐42; <br />
16:14-‐20; Luke 5:10; 6:12ff; 24:49; John 1:37ff; 12:25-‐26; 13:3-‐20; 14-‐16;17:18), Barnabas<br />
and Paul (Acts 9:26-‐27; 11:22-‐30; 12:25; 13:1-‐52; 14; 15:1-‐41; Gal 2:1, 7-‐10), Paul, Timothy<br />
and Titus (2 Corinthians 7 & 8; 1 & 2 Timothy; Titus), and Mary and Elizabeth (Luke 1:39-‐<br />
56). It can be said that mentoring is as old as the creation of man and woman. These<br />
biblical examples demonstrate how the relationships and the relational process provided the<br />
experience and transfer of values from one generation to the next. 61<br />
In the Old Testament book of Ruth, Naomi and Ruth epitomize an older<br />
woman mentoring a younger woman. Likewise, in the New Testament book of Luke<br />
to Succeed in Life, 17.<br />
60 Walvoord and Zuck, “Titus 1:5,” The Bible Knowledge Commentary, Old Testament,764.<br />
61 Paul D. Stanley and J. Robert Clinton, Connecting: The Mentoring Relationships You Need
26 <br />
1:39-56, Elizabeth and Mary model a mentoring relationship of an older woman <strong>with</strong> a<br />
younger woman. Both of these examples serve as a commentary on the Titus 2 mandate<br />
<strong>for</strong> women. The mentoring relationships of Mary and Elizabeth and of Ruth and Naomi<br />
are classic biblical examples of the value of women being <strong>with</strong> and learning from other<br />
women about faith, the issues they deal <strong>with</strong> in daily life, and their personal female<br />
needs.<br />
Elizabeth affirmed and encouraged Mary, nurturing her faith as she blessed<br />
Mary <strong>with</strong> these words:<br />
Blessed among women are you, and blessed is the fruit of your womb! And<br />
how has it happened to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me? For<br />
behold, when the sound of your greeting reached my ears, the baby leaped in my<br />
womb <strong>for</strong> joy. And blessed is she who believed that there would be a fulfillment<br />
of what had been spoken to her by the Lord (Luke 1:42-‐45).<br />
Elizabeth’s blessing not only affirmed Mary’s faith and trust in God, but also offered<br />
encouragement and acceptance <strong>with</strong>out judgment. God used this relationship <strong>with</strong><br />
Elizabeth to increase Mary’s faith through observing Elizabeth’s own pregnancy,<br />
receiving her prophecy over Mary, praying together, and seeing Elizabeth’s own personal<br />
life example. Mary stayed <strong>with</strong> Elizabeth <strong>for</strong> three months and was given the opportunity<br />
to learn about marriage, pregnancy, and child-bearing as Elizabeth mentored Mary both<br />
in word and actions. Likely, Mary also questioned and watched Elizabeth and learned<br />
how to be a godly wife, a life that Mary was yet to experience personally <strong>with</strong> her<br />
betrothed, Joseph. Mary and Elizabeth shared a deep type of friendship, a mentorship<br />
between two women in different stages of life.<br />
Naomi also represents a classic example in the Old Testament of an older<br />
woman in a mentoring relationship <strong>with</strong> a younger woman, her own daughter-in-law,<br />
Ruth. As the story unfolds, God providentially meets the needs of these two women,<br />
Naomi and Ruth, through the women’s mentoring relationship. In an act of commitment,<br />
love, loyalty and friendship, Ruth knitted her future to that of Naomi and to the God of
27 <br />
Israel. Not only had Ruth lived <strong>with</strong> Naomi and witnessed her character, marriage, and<br />
faith in the years prior to this commitment, but evidently Naomi taught Ruth the customs<br />
and traditions of the Hebrew faith and introduced her to the God of Israel, Yahweh. She<br />
and Naomi had developed a relationship of trust and respect. For, indeed, Ruth willingly<br />
committed herself to Naomi and left all that she k<strong>new</strong> behind to accompany her motherin-law<br />
into an uncertain future (Ruth 1:1-‐19). Commentators Walvoord and Zuck state the<br />
following about the women’s relationship: “Older women (gynaikas) could help the<br />
younger women in at least seven areas, a list that no doubt represents the apostle’s<br />
understanding of a young wife and mother’s proper priorities. This list, in the original,<br />
emphasizes first what young wives and mothers are to be, and then only secondarily what<br />
they are to do.” 62<br />
Nurturing, mentoring, encouraging, affirming, and exhorting necessitate the<br />
context of a relationship. Genesis 2:18 makes it clear that humans, male and female, are<br />
created <strong>for</strong> relationship. Most women thrive in and naturally desire relationships.<br />
Elizabeth and Mary and Naomi and Ruth represent ideal models of biblical women as<br />
nurturers and mentors. Women bring deeper understanding to other women regarding the<br />
physical, psychological, emotional, relational, sexual, hormonal, and experiential<br />
commonalities and can most effectively relate to one another on these various levels. As<br />
life bearers, designed to give birth, God created women <strong>with</strong> the unique capacities to care<br />
<strong>for</strong> others.<br />
Beverly Hislop states, “The book of Titus declares that ‘women shepherding<br />
women’ plays a key role in profoundly impacting a decadent culture <strong>for</strong> God.” 63 An<br />
eighteenth century poet and historian said, “If ever the world sees a time when women<br />
764.<br />
62 Walvoord and Zuck, “Titus 1:5,” The Bible Knowledge Commentary, Old Testament,738,<br />
63 Hislop, Shepherding a Woman’s Heart, 54.
28 <br />
shall come together purely and simply <strong>for</strong> the benefit and good of mankind, it will be a<br />
power such as the world has never seen.” 64 Brian Williams, in his book Potter’s Rib,<br />
makes the important statement that the practice of mentoring also finds its mandate in<br />
Paul’s explanation of his own ministry. In Col 1:28-29, Paul says, “We proclaim Him,<br />
admonishing and reaching everyone <strong>with</strong> all wisdom, so that we may present everyone<br />
perfect in Christ. To this end I labor, struggling <strong>with</strong> all His energy, which so powerfully<br />
works in me.” 65 God has given this power to men and women to minister to one another<br />
through mentoring relationships to help one another mature in order to serve God and<br />
others <strong>for</strong> His glory.<br />
Peer mentoring is also addressed in this study. Two examples of peer<br />
mentoring in Scripture would be Jonathan and David (1 Samuel 18-‐23:18), and Barnabas<br />
and Paul (Acts 9:26-‐27; 11:22-‐30; 12:25; 13:1-‐52; 14; 15:1-‐41; Gal 2:1, 7-‐10). The story of<br />
Jonathan and David’s friendship reveals the many times Jonathan counseled David as<br />
well as encouraged and exhorted him. This peer relationship represents a friendship<br />
between two individuals about the same age who shared common experiences and a<br />
natural ability to relate. This relationship reflects what authors Stanley and Clinton call<br />
“co-mentoring." They observe the following about Jonathan and David as co-mentors:<br />
It was an unlikely mix, but a powerful one. Jonathan was the heir to the throne<br />
of his father, King Saul. He was also a proven warrior and turned the tide of a<br />
battle <strong>with</strong> an individual heroic act (1 Samuel 14:6-23). He was a leader. David,<br />
on the other hand, came from a shepherd’s family, but like Jonathan was a warrior<br />
and hero. He became extremely popular after killing Goliath and then going on to<br />
lead Israel in one military success after another.…[David] He, too, was a leader.<br />
Jonathan and David were about the same age, young leaders <strong>with</strong> great<br />
futures. Under normal circumstances, one would expect that they would be<br />
competitors and resent one another, but the opposite was true. Unlike Jesus’<br />
disciples, who seemed to always vie <strong>for</strong> the best place and elbow one another in<br />
64 Dee Jepsen, Women Beyond Equal Rights (Waco, TX: Word Publishing, 1984), 227.<br />
72.<br />
65 Brian Willams, Potter’s Rib, (Vancouver, BC, Canada: Regent College Publishing, 2005),
29 <br />
the process, David and Jonathan constantly sought each other’s best (1 Samuel<br />
20) even at the risk of their own lives. 66<br />
A friendship or peer relationship like David and Jonathan had represents one worth<br />
praying <strong>for</strong> and pursuing. Stanley and Clinton call this type of peer relationship the “close<br />
buddy.” 67 They believe Jonathan and David’s relationship epitomizes the close buddy<br />
type of relationship.<br />
This [close buddy] relationship is characterized by unrestricted openness,<br />
trust, commitment, and a high sense of mutual accountability or sense of<br />
responsibility <strong>for</strong> one another….What moves people from friends to close buddies<br />
is a mutual commitment to the pursuit of a deeply meaningful goal. Out of this<br />
will grow a sense of responsibility <strong>for</strong> one another that will lift each buddy to <strong>new</strong><br />
levels that would not be reached alone. It also provides accountability <strong>for</strong> integrity<br />
and inner-life growth, which is vital <strong>for</strong> those who desire to finish well. 68<br />
Barnabas and Paul represent a second example of peer relationships. Stanley<br />
and Clinton describe this first century relationship by stating:<br />
Barnabas was a people influencer. He saw potential in Saul (later the Apostle<br />
Paul) when others kept their distance. Saul’s conversion turned this brilliant zealot<br />
of orthodox Judaism to a fearless Christian evangelist and apologist. Jews and the<br />
disciples alike feared him and were afraid to let him join them. ‘But Barnabas<br />
took him [Saul] and brought him to the apostles’(Acts 9:27). Barnabas was not<br />
intimidated by this brash convert, but drew him in and vouched <strong>for</strong> him.<br />
Undoubtedly, he encouraged and taught Saul during those early days and patiently<br />
stayed <strong>with</strong> him, knowing that time and experience would soon temper and<br />
mature this gifted young leader….Barnabas (the mentor) k<strong>new</strong> the kind of<br />
developmental environment and challenge that Saul needed in order to grow, and<br />
drew him into it. 69<br />
Barnabas illustrates a number of specific ways that mentors help mentorees. The study<br />
done by Stanley and Clinton identifies several important ones:<br />
1. Mentors give to mentorees:<br />
• timely advice;<br />
66 Stanley and Clinton, Connecting, 170-71.<br />
67 Ibid., 180.<br />
68 Ibid., 180-181.<br />
69 Ibid., 38-39.
30 <br />
• letters, articles, books, or other literary in<strong>for</strong>mation that offers<br />
perspective;<br />
• finances;<br />
• freedom to emerge as a leader even beyond the level of the mentor.<br />
2. Mentors risk their own reputation in order to sponsor a mentoree.<br />
3. Mentors model various aspects of leadership functions so as to challenge<br />
mentorees to move toward them.<br />
4. Mentors direct mentorees to needed resources that will further develop<br />
them.<br />
5. Mentors co-minister <strong>with</strong> mentorees in order to increase their confidence,<br />
status, and credibility. 70<br />
Scripture describes Barnabas as the Encourager, and Romans 12:8 mentions<br />
the gift of encouragement in regards to Barnabas. Gary R. Collins makes this term<br />
‘encourager’ clearer by explaining, “The Greek word from which this is translated means<br />
more than slapping someone on the back and saying, ‘hang in there!’ The term implies<br />
activities such as admonishing, exhorting, urging others to make worthwhile changes,<br />
supporting, com<strong>for</strong>ting, and encouraging people to face the future.” 71 By using his gift of<br />
encouragement, Barnabas exemplifies a key characteristic of a mentor.<br />
In a related passage in First Timothy 3:1-10, Paul gives the qualifications <strong>for</strong><br />
the leaders in the church who serve as overseers and deacons. He also provides a specific<br />
list of character qualities <strong>for</strong> women. “Women must likewise be dignified, not malicious<br />
gossips, but temperate, trustworthy in all things” (1Timothy 3:11). This reflects the same<br />
list of qualifications that Paul gave in Titus 2:3-5 <strong>for</strong> the godly older women who mentor<br />
and teach the younger women. As Beverly Hislop states, “An older woman who is able to<br />
teach what is good will teach by her life and words, soundness in faith, love, and<br />
endurance.” 72 The word older that Paul uses in his letter to Titus does not necessarily<br />
70 Ibid., 39-40.<br />
71 Gary R. Collins, Ph.D., The Biblical Basis of Christian Counseling <strong>for</strong> People Helpers<br />
(Colorado Springs, CO: NavPress, 1993), 164.<br />
72 Hislop, Shepherding a Woman’s Heart, 51.
31 <br />
mean older in chronological years. It means “advanced in the process,” 73 and the term<br />
younger women, means “early in the process.” 74 Sometimes younger women in terms of<br />
chronological years show more spiritual maturity than some older women. The converse<br />
can be true as well <strong>for</strong> sometimes there will be women who are older in chronological<br />
years, yet less spiritually mature than someone younger. Even so, it stands true that the<br />
longer people live, the more life experience they gain which they can pass along to<br />
others. It remains important to make sure that women learn from other women who are<br />
well experienced in life, mature, and trustworthy. These qualities represent the criteria <strong>for</strong><br />
a meaningful mentoring and shepherding relationship.<br />
In addition, in the Book of Philippians, Paul writes to the community of faith<br />
in Philippi. The Philippians were not to look to their own interests (as in oikeiosis) but<br />
rather to the needs of others (Phil.2:4). James M. Houston adds that “…the whole<br />
purpose of the epistle is an illustration of the social character of Christian mentoring as<br />
beneficial socially…” 75<br />
Conclusion<br />
As women come to <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary to study and train to become godly<br />
servant leaders, their desire remains to glorify God and serve the body of Christ<br />
worldwide. During their seminary career, mentoring relationships can enhance their<br />
preparation and help integrate what they study into their personal lives. The instruction<br />
Paul gives in Titus 2: 3-5 continues to be as valid <strong>for</strong> twenty-first century female<br />
seminarians as was true in the first century.<br />
NJ: Revell, 1966), I:43.<br />
73 W. E. Vine, “aged,” in An Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words (Old Tappan,<br />
74 Ibid., “<strong>new</strong>,” 3:110.<br />
NavPress, 2002), 51.<br />
75<br />
James M. Houston, The Mentored Life: From Individualism to Personhood (Colorado Springs, CO:
32 <br />
Literature Overview<br />
Over the years, needs and issues of women may change, but the basic need<br />
<strong>for</strong> Christian women to mentor, disciple, teach and train other women in the Christian life<br />
never changes. The importance of women mentoring women is not only mandated in<br />
Scripture, but the women in today’s culture are also asking <strong>for</strong> mentors. The data from<br />
the survey used in this D.Min. project reflects the women seminarians’ desire <strong>for</strong><br />
mentoring while at <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary.<br />
This literature review sought to focus on two specific areas: mentoring and the<br />
personal issues of female seminarians. <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary seeks to equip people <strong>with</strong> the<br />
necessary skills and training which will prepare men and women <strong>for</strong> a variety of<br />
ministries and enable them to minister in different Christian contexts around the world.<br />
The whole person must be considered when preparing to serve others. The areas in which<br />
a student struggles, whether academic or emotional, need to be addressed while in<br />
preparation <strong>for</strong> ministry so that each student grows more mature, more whole and healed,<br />
and thus better able to serve after completing her academic requirements.<br />
The Need <strong>for</strong> Mentoring<br />
Those who have had mentors state that they remain grateful <strong>for</strong> the experience.<br />
Those individuals who have not had a mentoring relationship express the desire and need<br />
<strong>for</strong> a mentor. Christian mentoring has the potential to help women re-direct their focus and<br />
dependence to God. Female mentors can have a positive effect on other women by truly<br />
loving them unconditionally and desiring their best by encouraging their relationship <strong>with</strong><br />
Jesus Christ. A successful mentoring relationship can build a woman’s confidence in and<br />
commitment to God, and help develop healthy connections <strong>with</strong> others. When relational<br />
connectedness occurs, a woman can lead a life that is no longer dependent on attention,<br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance, success, possessions, or beauty, but rather truly live a life glorifying to God<br />
while serving others.
33 <br />
Stanley and Clinton report that “two out of ten males seem to have a<br />
meaningful, open, and safe relationship where both parties share a trust and commitment to<br />
mutual responsibility <strong>for</strong> one another. Six out of ten women have this. Yet every man and<br />
woman needs at least one peer relationship (other than a spouse) like this where there is<br />
continuity and proximity in relating to one another.” 76 Author Dr. James M. Houston states<br />
this about mentoring:<br />
…the fact that mentors are now being prominently sought reflects first upon<br />
the alienation of our age. It also reveals an indifference to history and past<br />
traditions, <strong>for</strong> we <strong>for</strong>get today the long tradition of apprenticeship that was the<br />
basis of craftsmanship and of the role played by elders in many<br />
societies.…Wisdom, personified in a mentor, is thus the way of excellence<br />
(aretê). It is a friend who – not what – helps me to live life more fully and not to<br />
feel cheated personally in the process. 77<br />
As author Carol Brazo states, “We all want a mentor. We want someone to show us how<br />
to live and how to love. We want to know everything, from how to bake bread to how to<br />
love a difficult child. We were created to live in community, and it is in community that<br />
we frequently learn our most valuable lessons.” 78 I would suggest in light of her<br />
statement, that we were created <strong>for</strong> community and it is in Christian community that we<br />
learn how to live in a manner pleasing to God.<br />
Definitions of Mentoring<br />
<strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary trains men and women <strong>for</strong> Christian leadership and service<br />
worldwide. Bobb Biehl states, “The linchpin of Christian leadership development is the<br />
mentoring process.” 79 However, mentoring, it seems, reflects as many definitions as people<br />
76 Stanley and Clinton, Connecting, 167.<br />
77 Houston, The Mentored Life, 16.<br />
31-32.<br />
78 Carol Brazo, Divine Secrets of Mentoring (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2004),<br />
79 Bobb Biehl, Mentoring: Confidence in Finding a Mentor and Becoming One (Nashville:<br />
Broadman & Homan Publishers, 1996), 144.
34 <br />
who use the term. Brian Williams states the confusion over the word “mentoring” when he<br />
says,<br />
Mentoring is a concept and a practice whose coinage has been rather devalued<br />
in recent days. Economists tell us that one way to devalue a currency is to flood<br />
the market <strong>with</strong> counterfeit currency – cheap imitations that lack the gold<br />
necessary to give it substance. The contemporary ‘mentoring’ scene is like a<br />
cultural deluge, in fact, that threatens to carry us into the tributaries of stoic selfmastery,<br />
therapeutic self-actualization, or heroic self-accomplishment. [Williams<br />
says to] (see James Houston, The Mentored Life <strong>for</strong> a full characterization of these<br />
classical and modern options). 80<br />
Max De Pree also gives insight to the term by saying, “Mentoring is above all a<br />
work of love, which at its best is a two-way exchange.” 81 W. C. Wright further expands this<br />
idea by explaining the relationship this way: “At its best, mentoring is a covenental<br />
approach to life and leadership.…Mentoring is a process of becoming, not an unimpeded<br />
march to perfection.” 82 Mentoring means being a servant, an encourager, a teacher, a guide,<br />
a listener, a prayer warrior, an exhortor, a friend, and a poured out offering to the Lord<br />
while coming alongside another on their life journey and spiritual growth. “The Talmud<br />
says that every person must acquire two things in this world: a teacher and a friend. When<br />
we find a mentor, when we agree to mentor another, we have found just that – a teacher and<br />
a friend. Mentoring relationships are not one-way streets. Mentors teach and learn. They<br />
love and are loved. They listen and are listened to. It is a wonderful dance, a rich, eternal<br />
relationship.” 83<br />
A mentoring relationship combines friendship, discipling skills, shepherding,<br />
prayer, spiritual insight and guidance, lay counseling, and pastoral care. Again, Brian<br />
80 Williams, Potter’s Rib, 66.<br />
81 Max De Pree, Forward to Mentoring: The Promise of Relational Leadership, by W. C.<br />
Wright, (Waynesboro, GA: Paternoster Press, 2006), viii.<br />
82 Ibid., ix, xvi.<br />
83 Brazo, Divine Secrets of Mentoring, 160.
35 <br />
Williams’ insights on mentoring help to understand mentoring <strong>for</strong> pastoral <strong>for</strong>mation<br />
versus the cultural mentoring programs <strong>for</strong> personal gain and/or power. He states,<br />
… mentoring <strong>for</strong> pastoral <strong>for</strong>mation, however, looks rather different….The<br />
fundamental difference is that mentoring <strong>for</strong> pastoral <strong>for</strong>mation is not a technique,<br />
and is not oriented to improving one’s self as usually understood. It is oriented to<br />
neither power nor prestige, nor even ‘success,’ and it certainly cannot be practiced<br />
hastily. Instead, it is grounded in a deepening friendship, and turned toward the<br />
work of the Spirit, which leads us to put on Christ and die to self in preparation<br />
<strong>for</strong> service to church and world.” 84<br />
Mentoring revolves around a relationship between two people where there<br />
exists a bonding of hearts and a transparency shared that promotes the spiritual growth<br />
and maturity of each individual. Each mentoring relationship is unique yet the<br />
characteristics and the benefits often are the same, or at the very least, similar. In the<br />
Christian setting, discipleship and mentoring often share common aspects and inter-relate<br />
to each other. Yet the two have differences in that discipleship involves a teacher and a<br />
learner, or a disciple, <strong>with</strong> a call to follow a teacher or teaching. In addition, discipleship<br />
tends to narrow its focus to the spiritual dimension. Christian mentoring also has the<br />
spiritual focus, but spiritual mentoring is less about telling someone what to do, and more<br />
about helping them mature in their beliefs and behaviors. Anderson and Reese have this<br />
to say about the mentor as a friend:<br />
In the classical world of spiritual direction, the mentor was a guide, a director,<br />
a ruler and sometimes, a figure of authority. Often mentors were monastics,<br />
priests or clergy scholars who were highly respected in their society. Today it is<br />
common <strong>for</strong> mentors to be acquaintances in in<strong>for</strong>mal relationships: teacher and<br />
students, coach and team, small groups of friends who meet <strong>for</strong> coffee and<br />
spiritual talk. They gather <strong>for</strong> prayer, fellowship and spiritual <strong>for</strong>mation.<br />
Friendship and hospitality thus offer natural and com<strong>for</strong>table settings <strong>for</strong> spiritual<br />
mentoring. 85<br />
84 Williams, Potter’s Rib, 69.<br />
85 Keith Anderson and Randy D. Reese. Spiritual Mentoring: A Guide <strong>for</strong> Seeking and Giving<br />
Direction (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1999), 79.
36 <br />
Susan Hunt calls mentoring ‘spiritual mothering,’ and she says, “…My working<br />
definition <strong>for</strong> the spiritual mothering relationship is this: When a woman of faith and<br />
spiritual maturity enters into a nurturing relationship <strong>with</strong> a younger woman in order to<br />
encourage and equip her to live <strong>for</strong> God’s glory.” 86 Marsha Sinetar makes this comment<br />
about mentors and mentoring,<br />
Even proven leaders want mentors (or at minimum friends <strong>with</strong> the mentor’s<br />
spirit), in part because they’re reaching into the unknown <strong>for</strong> selfexpression….It’s<br />
accepted that many leaders like to go it alone. A mentor of<br />
leaders establishes a climate of trust in which two-way discussions can<br />
occur….Mentors are congruent: They’re actually who they purport to be, and that<br />
trait encourages our congruency. 87<br />
Carolyn Duff in Learning From Other Women, offers insight into mentoring<br />
when she says, “In most cases, your woman-to-woman mentoring relationship will be<br />
built on knowing, being know, and caring. Your mentor will respond to the multiple<br />
aspects of your life and guide you toward what is most appropriate and most fulfilling <strong>for</strong><br />
you.” 88 In As Iron Sharpens Iron, Howard Hendricks offers this definition <strong>for</strong> mentoring:<br />
“In fact, the simplest definition I know of a mentor is a person committed to two things:<br />
helping you grow and keeping you growing, and helping you realize your life goals.” 89<br />
Bernard of Clairvaux was a friend and mentor to Aelred of Rivaulx and had<br />
such an impact on Aelred that he wrote the following perspective on friendship and<br />
mentorship:<br />
For friendship bears fruit in this life and in the next. But what happiness, what<br />
security, what joy to have someone to whom you dare to speak on terms of<br />
equality as to another self; one to whom you need have no fear to confess your<br />
failing; one to whom you can unblushingly make known what progress you have<br />
86 Susan Hunt, Spiritual Mothering (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 1992), 46.<br />
87 Marsha Sinetar, The Mentor’s Spirit: Life Lessons on Leadership and the Art of<br />
Encouragement (New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press, 1999), 39.<br />
88 Carolyn Duff, Learning From Other Women (New York: AMACOM, 1999), 40.<br />
89 Howard G. Hendricks and William D. Hendricks, As Iron Sharpens Iron: Building<br />
Character in a Mentoring Relationship (Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1995), 25.
37 <br />
made in the spiritual life; on to whom you can entrust all the secrets of your heart<br />
and be<strong>for</strong>e whom can place all your plans! What, there<strong>for</strong>e, is more pleasant than<br />
so to unite to oneself the spirit of another and of two to <strong>for</strong>m one, that no boasting<br />
is thereafter to be feared, no suspicion to be dreaded, no correction of one by the<br />
other to cause pain, no praise on the part of one to bring a charge of adulation<br />
from the other. ‘A friend,’ says the Wise Man, ‘is the medicine of life.’<br />
Friendship, there<strong>for</strong>e, heightens the joys of prosperity and mitigates the sorrows<br />
of adversity by dividing and sharing them. Hence, the best medicine in life is a<br />
friend. 90<br />
This statement speaks of the power of a deep friendship. Friendship is one aspect of a<br />
good and successful mentoring relationship.<br />
Gail Sheehy in Pathfinders defines a mentor as “a trusted friend and<br />
counselor, usually from ten to twenty years older, who endorses the apprentice’s dream<br />
and helps in a critical way to guide him or her toward realizing it.” 91 It seems that in both<br />
the literary world and in the secular world, advising, counseling, encouraging, guiding,<br />
sharing friendship, and supporting are all aspects of the mentoring relationship. The<br />
subject of mentoring comes up most frequently in the worlds of business and education.<br />
In education, the mentor is involved <strong>with</strong> the development of the person. Mentors are<br />
guides who “have something to do <strong>with</strong> the growing up, <strong>with</strong> the development of identity<br />
[in the protégé].” 92 In the business world, the mentor is more concerned <strong>with</strong> the<br />
development of contacts and guiding the protégé toward the achievement of skills and<br />
career goals. Scheele defines this type of mentor as “a manager to coach and champion” 93<br />
the mentoree or protégé. And, yet another insight is given to the mentoring definition<br />
when Murray and Owen say, “Mentoring is a deliberate paring of a more skilled or<br />
Cistercian, 1977), 71, 72.<br />
90 Aelred of Rivaulx, Spiritual Friendship, trans. Mary Eugenia Laker (Kalamazoo, MI:<br />
91 Gail Sheehy, Pathfinders (New York: NY: Bantam Books, 1981), 231.<br />
92 Laurent A. Daloz, Effective Teaching and Mentoring: Realizing the Trans<strong>for</strong>mational<br />
Power of Adult Learning and Experiences (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1986), 19.<br />
93 A. Scheele, “Second Stage Mentoring,” (Working Women 17 Oct., 1992), 32-35.
38 <br />
experienced person <strong>with</strong> a lesser skilled or experienced one, <strong>with</strong> the agreed-upon goal of<br />
having the lesser skilled person grow and develop specific competencies.” 94<br />
Paul Stanley and Robert Clinton, in their book Connecting, have their own<br />
definition <strong>for</strong> mentoring: “Mentoring is a relational process in which a mentor, who<br />
knows or has experienced something, transfers that something (resources of wisdom,<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation, experience, confidence, insight, relationships, status, etc.) to a mentoree, at<br />
an appropriate time and manner, so that it facilitates development or empowerment. 95 A<br />
good example of this comes from Muriel L. Cook, author of Kitchen Table Counseling.<br />
She is not a professional counselor but was considered the “Counselor-at-Large at<br />
Multnomah Bible College.” 96 After years of being sought by students and women from<br />
around the world <strong>for</strong> the God-given wisdom she had to share, Cook concludes, “In time, I<br />
came to call this God-given ministry to women ‘kitchen table counseling.’… Although I<br />
am not a professional counselor, I reach out to hurting women sitting across my kitchen<br />
table, using scriptural truth and spiritual encouragement.” 97 Janet Schaller offers these<br />
thoughts on the relationship between mentoring and counseling:<br />
Mentoring is not the same as counseling although some of the behaviors may<br />
apply to both situations. The relationship is different, and the intent of the mentor<br />
and counselor is not the same. As <strong>with</strong> counseling, successful mentoring involves<br />
a change in the person being mentored. A trans<strong>for</strong>mation occurs….The word<br />
‘trans<strong>for</strong>mation’ itself indicates a move from one ‘<strong>for</strong>m’ to another. When one<br />
changes patterns of thinking and preconceived notions, one’s behavior also is<br />
altered and one gains a <strong>new</strong> understanding of self. Women’s growth as person is<br />
tied more to making connections than to severing relationships, even <strong>with</strong><br />
themselves. Whether it is separation or connection that is trans<strong>for</strong>mative in<br />
94 M. Murray and M. Owen, Beyond the Myths and Magic of Mentoring (San Francisco, CA:<br />
Jossey-Bass, 1991), xiv.<br />
95 Stanley and Clinton, Connecting, 40.<br />
96 Muriel L. Cook and Shelley Cook Volkhardt, Kitchen Table Counseling (Colorado<br />
Springs, CO: NavPress, 2006), 8.<br />
97 Ibid., 15.
39 <br />
mentoring, it is <strong>with</strong> the context of this one-to-one relationship that trans<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
takes place. 98<br />
Lastly, David G. Benner in Care of Souls introduces the term “spiritual guides”<br />
in the context of mentoring and explains the history of spiritual guides.<br />
While the earliest spiritual guides tended to be clergy and often were monks,<br />
over time more and more of those filling this office in the pre-Re<strong>for</strong>mation church<br />
of the West were laity. In the Celtic church in Great Britain, several of the most<br />
famous spiritual guides were women. Similarly, in the thirteenth century the<br />
Dominicans involved nuns in the task of spiritual guidance. The qualifications<br />
remained the same; guides were to be persons of insight and discernment who had<br />
made progress in their own spiritual pilgrimage and who could lovingly lead<br />
others toward spiritual growth. 99<br />
It is quite evident that there exist many ways to define the concept of mentoring. But in<br />
all cases, mentoring always involves one person modeling or passing on something<br />
needed in the life of another person to help the receiver grow in knowledge and skills and<br />
increase in maturity.<br />
General Mentoring Overview<br />
Through the years many books have been written on the subject of mentoring,<br />
and most have been written by men <strong>for</strong> men. A few books on mentoring have been written<br />
by men about mentoring in general. These books have many practical principles and<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation that can apply to mentoring either gender. Bobb Biehl gives a comprehensive<br />
overview of mentoring in his book Mentoring: Confidence in Finding a Mentor and<br />
Becoming One. He identifies a trend in academia related to the subject of mentoring, which<br />
is documented by Stephen E. Olsen in his Biola University doctoral dissertation on the<br />
subject of mentoring. Olsen states the following:<br />
Prior to the 1970’s, literature on mentoring was virtually nonexistent. Between<br />
1890 and 1980, Dissertation Abstracts International lists only four dissertations on<br />
98 Janet Schaller, “Mentoring of Women: Trans<strong>for</strong>mation in Adult Religious Education”<br />
(Religious Education, Vol. 91, No. 2, Spring 1996), 163- 64.<br />
99 David G. Benner, Care of Souls: Revisioning Christian Nurture and Counsel (Grand<br />
Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1998), 30.
40 <br />
the subject; whereas between 1980 and 1984, over 100 dissertations on mentoring<br />
are cited in the field of education alone. Gray (1986) notes that over 400 articles<br />
and research studies focused on mentoring in the years between the mid 1970s<br />
and 1986. This literature production has continued unabated. In the 4 years<br />
between 1988 and 1992, the Dissertation Abstracts computer database lists 372<br />
dissertations that use the word mentor as a key word; and between January 1993<br />
and June 1994 alone, there are an additional 143 dissertations on mentoring. 100<br />
Biehl believes mentoring is critical <strong>for</strong> this present generation. He explains, “Mentoring<br />
is the bridge that will connect, strengthen, and stabilize future generations of Christians in<br />
an increasingly complex and threatening world.” 101 It has often been said that Christianity<br />
is only one generation away from extinction. There<strong>for</strong>e, any development one can<br />
achieve towards making mentoring a priority in programming, training, and in the life<br />
experience of one’s circle of influence as a Christian merits the time, study, and attention.<br />
Biehl also makes an important point by saying, “It may not be popular to say so these<br />
days, but another advantage of same gender mentoring is that men understand men and<br />
women understand women.” 102<br />
Drs. Les, III, and Leslie Parrott, authors of The Marriage Manual, emphasize<br />
the importance of passing on in<strong>for</strong>mation from one generation to the next by saying,<br />
“Down through the centuries, young people have learned most through careful<br />
observation of those who are more experienced….Throughout human history, mentoring<br />
has been the primary means of passing on knowledge and skills in every field and in<br />
every culture.” 103 Dr. Charles Swindoll underlines the value of supportive relationships.<br />
He makes this observation: “Many in God’s vineyard are ‘dying on the vine’ <strong>for</strong> lack of<br />
encouragement from other believers….The idea is this: An encouraging comment gives<br />
100 Bobb Biehl, Mentoring, 57, 11.<br />
101 Ibid., 15.<br />
102 Ibid., 65.<br />
103 Drs. Les III, and Leslie Parrott, The Marriage Manual (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan<br />
Publishing House, 1995), 7, 12.
41 <br />
us emotional strength, lightens our heart, and firms up our resolve. One kind word can<br />
make a bad day much more bearable.” 104 In an article <strong>for</strong> Christian Education Journal,<br />
James M. Houston adds,<br />
What the therapist is <strong>for</strong> secular society, the mentor/spiritual director is<br />
becoming <strong>for</strong> the church…caring, sensitive, approachable friends who help us<br />
negotiate through the labyrinth of life, and who warn us of the moral pitfalls along<br />
the way, are of inestimable value. Open, honest feedback is hard to obtain in<br />
impersonal structures, bureaucracies, and competitive rivals. There we are afraid<br />
to ask, to be vulnerable, and to live openly. 105<br />
J. Robert Clinton introduced a way to look at the differing roles a mentor<br />
serves. He suggests nine types of mentoring relationships in his work entitled The Mentor<br />
Handbook: 106<br />
Table 1. A variety of types and functions in mentoring relationships<br />
TYPE<br />
Discipler<br />
Spiritual Guide<br />
Coach<br />
Counselor<br />
Teacher<br />
Sponsor<br />
Contemporary<br />
Model<br />
Historical Model<br />
Divine Contact<br />
CENTRAL THRUST OF EMPOWERMENT<br />
Enabler <strong>for</strong> the basics of following Christ<br />
Provides accountability <strong>for</strong> spirituality and spiritual disciplines,<br />
growth and maturity, direction and insight <strong>for</strong> decision making<br />
Provides skills, application, motivation to use, needed to meet a<br />
task<br />
Offers timely advice; correct perspective on viewing self, others,<br />
circumstances and ministry<br />
Provides knowledge; motivation toward learning, knowledge<br />
and understanding of a particular subject<br />
Provides career guidance, protection and development <strong>with</strong>in or<br />
as the leader moves upward an organization<br />
A living, personal model <strong>for</strong> life or ministry who exemplifies<br />
and inspires emulation and is a means <strong>for</strong> acquiring values and<br />
skills by vicarious learning<br />
Teaches dynamic principles and values <strong>for</strong> life and ministry;<br />
examples of those who “finished well”<br />
Timely guidance or discernment perceived as divine intervention<br />
104 Charles Swindoll, “Does Your Figure of Speech Look Fat?” in Kindred Spirit (<strong>Dallas</strong>, TX:<br />
<strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary Publishers, Summer, 2008, Vol. 32, No. 2), 19.<br />
1991), 2-23.<br />
105 Houston, The Mentored Life, 81, 82.<br />
106 J. Robert Clinton and Richard W. Clinton. The Mentor Handbook (Altadena, CA: Barnabas,
42 <br />
Clinton draws attention to the fact that mentoring can be manifested in many different<br />
ways. It often depends on what the mentor has to offer and what the mentoree needs. Each<br />
mentoring relationship has its own unique characteristics.<br />
Brian A. Williams, author of Potter’s Rib, approaches mentoring from the<br />
standpoint of its results. He offers these thoughts:<br />
…Mentoring is not self-mastery <strong>for</strong> the sake of self-sufficiency, that it does<br />
not provide us <strong>with</strong> rational techniques <strong>for</strong> the sake of speedy progress, and that it<br />
does not lead us toward a fashionable lifestyle promising self-fulfillment. Instead,<br />
we described mentoring <strong>for</strong> pastoral <strong>for</strong>mation as a) grounded in deepening<br />
friendship, b) turned toward the work of Christ and the Spirit, and c) taken up<br />
<strong>with</strong> dying to self, putting on Christ, and preparing to serve the church and the<br />
world. 107<br />
Keith Anderson concurs <strong>with</strong> Williams. In his book Spiritual Mentoring, Anderson<br />
describes mentoring as “having a trajectory, an aim, a target and a purpose.” 108 He says<br />
that “mentoring is not mindless or soulless meandering but a journey that recognizes<br />
itself as pilgrimage, a journey <strong>with</strong> a spiritual or devotional purpose, and that it is the task<br />
of the mentor to help us sink deep enough into our lives to discover that purpose.” 109<br />
Henri Nouwen adds this insight about the value of a selfless mentor:<br />
In our society plagued by fear, anxiety, loneliness, depression, and a sense of<br />
being lost, we keep looking <strong>for</strong> guides. We so much hope that someone – a guru,<br />
spiritual director, or soul friend – can help us make sense out of our confusion and<br />
can show us a way to inner wholeness, freedom, and peace. We look mostly <strong>for</strong><br />
men and women <strong>with</strong> a reputation, <strong>with</strong> wisdom, psychological insight, spiritual<br />
sensitivity, and solid life experience. 110<br />
As Iron Sharpens Iron by Howard and William Hendricks, specifically targets<br />
mentoring to men. Like Brian Williams, the Hendricks also emphasize the goal of<br />
mentoring when stating,<br />
107 Williams, Potter’s Rib, 249.<br />
108 Anderson and Reese, Spiritual Mentoring, 48.<br />
109 Ibid., 48.<br />
110 Henri J. Nouwen, Adam, God’s Beloved (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1997), 86-87.
43 <br />
At their best, mentors nurture our souls. They shape our character. They call<br />
us to become complete men, whole men, and by the grace of God, holy men. The<br />
Bible puts it this way: ‘As iron sharpens iron, so one man sharpens another.’<br />
(Proverbs 27:17). 111<br />
Even though the Hendricks focus their book primarily towards men mentoring men, they<br />
strongly emphasize that it includes many helpful insights, principles, and in<strong>for</strong>mation on<br />
mentoring in general. They include this statement:<br />
Of course, mentoring is a process that can benefit women as well as men, so<br />
by targeting this discussion toward men we do not mean to exclude women. All of<br />
the concepts and principles described here probably apply equally to women as<br />
well as men, and except <strong>for</strong> a few obvious cases, female readers can probably<br />
substitute the words ‘woman’ or ‘women’ <strong>for</strong> the words ‘man’ or ‘men,’ <strong>with</strong>out<br />
changing the substance of what we have to say. 112<br />
Their acknowledgement of mentoring as being necessary and valuable in anyone’s life is<br />
reflected in the five benefits identified: “A mentor (1) promotes genuine growth, (2) is a<br />
model to follow, (3) helps you efficiently reach your goals, (4) plays a key role in God’s<br />
pattern <strong>for</strong> your growth, and (5) benefits other people in your life.” 113<br />
It remains true that broad principles related to mentoring can be applied to<br />
both men and women, but specific needs of men and women are best passed on in the<br />
context of relationships between the same gender. Men often relate differently than<br />
women and books specific to women will most adequately address the unique needs of<br />
women.<br />
Women Mentoring Women<br />
This study addresses the need <strong>for</strong> women to develop deep and meaningful<br />
friendships <strong>with</strong> their female peers and <strong>with</strong> older, more mature Christian women.<br />
Although there exists a great deal of good in<strong>for</strong>mation on the subject of mentoring, much<br />
111 Ibid., 18.<br />
112 Hendricks and Hendricks, As Iron Sharpens Iron, 10.<br />
113 Ibid., 25.
44 <br />
of it focuses on men mentoring men. There remains limited and less specific material<br />
addressing women mentoring women. However, considering the many ways that God<br />
created males and females differently from one another, it would follow that mentoring<br />
<strong>for</strong> women would be even more helpful when provided by a woman.<br />
Vickie Kraft states in Women Mentoring Women, “Many young women today<br />
come to Christ who have not been reared in godly homes….These young women don’t<br />
know what a godly woman, wife, or mother is like, and they need to have that modeled<br />
be<strong>for</strong>e them. And no one can model a godly Christian woman except…a godly Christian<br />
woman.” 114 Kraft also has this to say about women needing other women: “There is<br />
almost no limit to what women can do today. They can evangelize, teach, serve on church<br />
staffs and committees, and be administrators. They can be involved in educations at every<br />
level, from preschool to graduate school; in children’s and youth ministries; in music, art,<br />
and drama. They can help the poor and needy in practical ways. Most of all, women can<br />
encourage women in this complex and confused society.” 115<br />
Throughout history, women have learned from other women. Carolyn Duff<br />
observes this about women, “We have learned by watching and being guided by our<br />
mothers, our grandmothers, our aunts, teachers, coaches, counselors, professors, sisters,<br />
and friends. We have studied in the kitchens and gardens of women <strong>with</strong> degrees in<br />
living. Through stories and example, by answering our questions and nudging us <strong>with</strong><br />
their own, women have passed on to other women lessons in how to live. More<br />
specifically, women have taught us how to recognize, understand, and respect ourselves<br />
as rich, complex female beings.” 116<br />
114 Vickie Kraft, Women Mentoring Women (Chicago: Moody Press, 1992), 27.<br />
115 Ibid., 21.<br />
116 Duff, Learning From Other Women, 37.
45 <br />
In an article in Higher Education Research and Development, researchers<br />
from Flinders University, Australia, report on mentoring among women and they make<br />
the observation that historically mentoring has been an in<strong>for</strong>mal process. This process<br />
happens when a mentor and mentoree meet spontaneously, <strong>for</strong>m a relationship, and meet<br />
<strong>for</strong> the purposes of assisting the mentoree in development of her career relevant skills.<br />
More recently, these researchers have observed that a trend towards <strong>for</strong>mal or assigned<br />
mentoring relationships has developed in organizations. Mentoring relationships have<br />
been reported to have overwhelmingly positive learning experiences <strong>for</strong> both the mentor<br />
and the mentoree. Those who have been engaged in mentoring relationships mention<br />
many beneficial outcomes <strong>for</strong> the mentoree, such as encouragement, networking,<br />
empathy, contact, and increased self-confidence. 117<br />
Carolyn S. Duff, in Learning From Other Women, states, “At work, women<br />
have been mentored by men, in the male tradition, producing results that reflect and<br />
perpetuate the existing system.” 118 This is not to say that men can’t be wonderful career<br />
and spiritual mentors, because they can. Women need men to provide in<strong>for</strong>mation,<br />
coaching, opportunity, and support <strong>for</strong> their professional development. However,<br />
according to research done by Shaunti and Jeff Feldhan, “More than a man, a woman will<br />
be regularly hit by unresolved emotional issues or hurts from a conversation or concern<br />
from last night, last month, or ten years ago.…If this is the way a woman is wired, it<br />
would be irrational <strong>for</strong> her not to address something that has circled back around.” 119<br />
Also, Carolyn Duff further explains, “Women need women as mentors because only<br />
117 Maria Gardiner, Marika Tiggemann, Hugh Kearns and Kelly Marshall, “Show Me the<br />
Money! An Empirical Analysis of Mentoring Outcomes <strong>for</strong> Women in Academia,” Higher Education<br />
Research and Development Vol. 26, No. 4, December 2007, pp. 425-442.<br />
118 Duff, Learning From Other Women, xiii.<br />
119<br />
Shaunti Feldhan and Jeff Feldhan, For Men Only: A Straight<strong>for</strong>ward Guide to the Inner<br />
Lives of Women (Atlanta, GA: Multnomah Publisher, Inc, 2006), 58-59.
46 <br />
women can truly empathize <strong>with</strong> the experience of being a woman.” 120 In the British<br />
Journal of Theological Education it was noted that an “ethic of care” exists as a needed<br />
element in mentoring, especially among women:<br />
Mentoring also has the potential to model what Carol Gilligan (In a Different<br />
Voice, 1982) called an ethic of care. The ethic of care is crucial <strong>for</strong> the<br />
development of a strong, supportive community that nurtures faculty staff and<br />
students and embraces difference. This ethic of care is of crucial support,<br />
especially <strong>for</strong> the women in theological education who seem to face special<br />
challenges. It embodies both relatedness and responsiveness. 121<br />
The nature of woman-to-woman mentoring allows women the opportunity to<br />
share their frustrations, emotions, worries and experiences <strong>with</strong> other women who can<br />
relate to being female. Women mentors can provide objective and encouraging feedback<br />
and insights, as well as help to strengthen another woman’s personal relationships and her<br />
relationship <strong>with</strong> the Lord. Woman-to-woman mentoring also benefits ministry decisions,<br />
family decisions, or specific life challenges as a woman. “Woman-to-woman mentoring<br />
allows <strong>for</strong> uncertainty as a fertile condition from which decision and action grow….The<br />
process in woman-to-woman mentoring is one of discovery.” 122<br />
Many of the researchers on women’s needs and issues agree that women<br />
minister to each other most effectively. As Duff states, “The nature of woman-to-woman<br />
mentoring is that it invites and allows us to share our frustrations and worries <strong>with</strong> a<br />
person who can relate to our lives.” 123 To be an effective mentor to another, one must<br />
learn how to listen, identify <strong>with</strong> another’s situation, and bring to the relationship mature<br />
wisdom and experience that will challenge the other to grow relationally, mentally, and<br />
spiritually.<br />
120 Duff, Learning From Other Women, 4.<br />
121<br />
Leona M. English and Lorna Bowman, “Working With Experience: The Mentor, the<br />
Context, the Possibility,” British Journal of Theological Education 12, no. 1 ( August 2001): 40-56.<br />
122 Ibid., 43.<br />
123 Duff, Learning From Other Women, 111.
47 <br />
Deborah Tannen in her extensive research on the differences between the way<br />
men and women communicate offers these insights:<br />
…To him, talk is <strong>for</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation….But to her, talk is <strong>for</strong> interaction. Telling<br />
things is a way to show involvement, and listening is a way to show interest and<br />
caring.…In our culture, most people, but especially women look to their closest<br />
relationships as havens in a hostile world….For grown women…the essence of<br />
friendship is talk, telling each other what they’re thinking and feeling and what<br />
happened that day….When asked who their best friends are, most women name<br />
other women they talk to regularly. 124<br />
Women communicate as part of their relational style and to get and keep connected.<br />
Tannen goes on to say that many women approach the world “as an individual in a<br />
network of connections…. Conversations are negotiations <strong>for</strong> closeness in which people<br />
try to seek and give confirmation and support, and to reach consensus. They try to protect<br />
themselves from others’ attempts to push them away. Life, then, is a community, a<br />
struggle to preserve intimacy and avoid isolation.” 125 Schaller agrees <strong>with</strong> Tannen and<br />
adds this insight regarding women mentoring women,<br />
…A one-to-one relationship <strong>with</strong> someone who has experienced a journey of<br />
trans<strong>for</strong>mation makes it safe, if not always easy, to talk about one’s own<br />
experiences and to share one’s questions, secret fears, past hurts, and hope. For<br />
too long women have been taught to claim the male experience of discontinuity<br />
and separation as the norm, yet women’s experience is more likely to be one of<br />
continuity and connection. A mentoring relationship could encourage a woman to<br />
claim her emerging, nascent self, a self more truly reflecting the image of God in<br />
which she was created. 126<br />
Mentoring can be a <strong>for</strong>mal or in<strong>for</strong>mal relationship. English and Bowman in<br />
the British Journal of Theological Education assert the following about the mentoring<br />
relationship:<br />
124 Deborah Tannen, You Just Don’t Understand (New York: Harper Collins Publishers,<br />
2007), 80-81.<br />
125 Ibid., 25.<br />
126 Schaller, Religious Education, 167.
48 <br />
…The quintessential mentoring relationship [is one] in which one mentor is<br />
paired <strong>with</strong> one mentee. This can be a serendipitous combination of two people<br />
<strong>for</strong> the purpose of sponsoring or promoting the other's development. The type of<br />
mentoring being promoted here is more in<strong>for</strong>mal than the organised (sic), planned<br />
and monitored mentoring that can also help mentees and mentors benefit from the<br />
exchange of mentorship. 127<br />
For the purposes of this study the focus will stay primarily on mentoring as an arranged,<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mal relationship in which the older or more experienced student is trained <strong>for</strong>mally<br />
to in<strong>for</strong>mally to relate to and offer their eyes, ears, voice, and experience, to a younger or<br />
less experienced student. The mentor holds a shared desire to grow in maturity in Christ.<br />
When a woman seeks to be mentored by another woman, she seeks to benefit from and<br />
be enhanced by the other woman’s wisdom and her experience. 128 As Brian Williams<br />
describes in Potter’s Rib, “…to help them explore the overlapping contours of who they<br />
are in Christ and what they are called to do <strong>for</strong> Christ. This is the overlap of their being<br />
and their thinking under the indigenous pressures, responsibilities, and tasks of doing<br />
pastoral ministry…” 129<br />
Many intelligent women know that they would benefit from learning<br />
connections <strong>with</strong> other women, but they hesitate to initiate the relationship. 130 Initiating<br />
the mentoring relationship can be hard <strong>for</strong> some younger women since they sometimes<br />
feel a personal rejection of themselves as a person if the older woman does not respond.<br />
In these cases it would be more helpful if the more mature woman would approach the<br />
younger woman and initiate the conversation and introduce the possibility of starting a<br />
mentoring relationship. Older women should show sensitivity regarding the reluctance of<br />
some younger women who appear more shy and reserved and respond more<br />
127<br />
English and Bowman, British Journal of Theological Education 12, 40-56.<br />
128 Duff, Learning From Other Women, 113.<br />
129 Williams, Potter’s Rib, 55.<br />
130 Duff, Learning From Other Women, 14.
49 <br />
enthusiastically to those younger women who tend to be more direct and outgoing. Duff<br />
offers these observations about the protégés or the mentorees:<br />
Protégés, however, must be willing and able to hear and accept critical<br />
feedback from their female mentors. Constructive honest criticism and positive<br />
encouragement are vital elements in a powerful mentoring relationship. The value<br />
of a mentor is stated well by Duff saying,…often the greatest gift a woman<br />
mentor can offer is her ability to recognize and encourage your talents and<br />
powers. A good mentor will mentor you, not recreate herself. She will coach,<br />
guide, and encourage you to become the best of yourself. 131<br />
Marsha Sinetar also indicates that there are signs of productive mentors that one should<br />
look <strong>for</strong>:<br />
• They affirm life and further its potential.<br />
• They enter into authentic dialogue because, at heart, they are genuine and<br />
emotionally available.<br />
• They set clear boundaries <strong>for</strong> self-and-other.<br />
• They embody values and virtues others merely extol (“walk the talk”).<br />
• They stabilize people in a continuity of ef<strong>for</strong>t because they themselves are<br />
grounded. 132<br />
Bev Hislop encapsulates the concept of women as mentors by saying, “What<br />
is the essential nature of a woman? She is at the core a life-bearer and a nurturer. She is a<br />
companion, one who comes alongside to enhance another. She was designed <strong>for</strong> lifegiving<br />
relationships.” 133 Since God created the female to give birth, she is a “life-giver.”<br />
Mentoring another woman through her experiences becomes a life-giving relationship. A<br />
“life-giving relationship” would be one in which through encouragement and nurture,<br />
spiritual and emotional growth occurs, thus contributing to the enrichment of another’s<br />
life.<br />
Since God created women as life-bearers and nurtures, relationships play a<br />
key role <strong>for</strong> women. “Women are particularly good at reading the character of people, of<br />
131 Ibid., 71, 89.<br />
132 Sinetar, The Mentor’s Spirit, 146.<br />
133 Hislop, Shepherding a Woman’s Heart, 47.
50 <br />
leading relationally, and of functioning from an ethic of care,” 134 observes Hislop.<br />
Participation in the roles of pastoral care, shepherding, and mentoring gives a woman the<br />
opportunity to minister to other women in a way that only a woman can do. Hislop makes<br />
an important point when stating, “Today women have to be intentional about finding<br />
ways to enter community, to connect <strong>with</strong> one another. The need <strong>for</strong> input, care, and<br />
shepherding from other women is heightened even further because these kinds of<br />
relationships are not readily available. They are not built into the everyday life of most<br />
women.” 135 Sandy Sheehy has also discovered the importance of relationships in a<br />
woman’s life. She states in Connecting,<br />
Today…an increasing number of psychologists and sociologists on the cutting<br />
edge of women’s development contend that female friendship is indeed a primary<br />
bond. Their research reveals that over the course of our lives, the ability to <strong>for</strong>m<br />
and maintain solid, rewarding friendships <strong>with</strong> other women is essential both to<br />
our personal growth and fulfillment and to the health of our sexual and family<br />
relationship.…Women today sense that we need female friendship more than<br />
ever. Our lives are moving so quickly, and everything from technology to the<br />
concept of what constitutes a family is changing so fast that we must look to our<br />
women friends to provide both stability and a reality check… 136<br />
These relationships involve mutual acceptance, caring, and sharing. Dr. Deborah<br />
Newman posits, “I think women grow, heal, and change in the context of supportive<br />
relationships.” 137 And as <strong>with</strong> any relationship, it requires priority, respect, and attention<br />
if they intend to succeed and survive.<br />
134 Ibid., 72.<br />
135 Ibid., 79.<br />
136 Sandy Sheehy, Connecting: The Enduring Power of Female Friendship (New York, NY:<br />
HarperCollins Publishers, Inc., 2000), xvi.<br />
165.<br />
137 Deborah Newman, Passion on Purpose (Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House Publishers, 2003),
51 <br />
Women in the twenty-first century have many roles, responsibilities, and goals<br />
which they fill, and which intertwine <strong>with</strong> each other. Coomes and DeBard report that<br />
Millennial students have different experiences and expectations regarding gender and<br />
sexism. They observe the following about the young women:<br />
This generation holds attitudes about appropriate roles <strong>for</strong> women that are<br />
much more egalitarian than in earlier generations. This is a generation that has<br />
seen a rise in women as leaders in peer culture, government (Hillary Clinton,<br />
Madeline Albright, and Condoleezza Rice), business, and many other areas.<br />
Millennial students have decreasing expectations that women’s place is restricted<br />
to the home, <strong>with</strong> only 21.5 percent of students agreeing that ‘the activities of<br />
women are best restricted to home and family’ (Sax and others, 2001, 32). 138<br />
This younger generation looks at life and understands the roles of women differently<br />
from previous conservative evangelical generations. Bridging that gap through mentoring<br />
will benefit all generations and help them learn from and understand one another better.<br />
Howe and Strauss add this important observation about the Millennials and<br />
their relationships: “Part of the ritual of going to college in the past was a separation from<br />
<strong>for</strong>mer relationships, including friends and parents. However, <strong>new</strong> technology ‘is making<br />
it harder <strong>for</strong> Millennials to “let go” of their old high school worlds, to replace old friends<br />
<strong>with</strong> <strong>new</strong> ones.’” 139 C.A. Barnard is concerned that steady use of cell phones makes the<br />
task of building community on campus more difficult as face-to-face discussions have<br />
been replaced <strong>with</strong> chatting on the phone. 140 With the rise and popularity of technology<br />
students regularly use instant messaging (IM), Facebook, and email to keep in touch <strong>with</strong><br />
others rather than meeting face-to-face. Although technology offers students the<br />
138 Ellen M. Broido, “Understanding Diversity in Millennial Students,” Serving the Millennial<br />
Generation, New Directions <strong>for</strong> Student Services, No. 106, Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (San Francisco: Jossey-<br />
Bass, Summer 2004), 78.<br />
Associates, 2007), 93.<br />
139 Neil Howe and William Strauss, Millennials Go to College, 2 nd Ed., (USA: LifeCourse<br />
140 C. A. Barnard, “The Impact of Cell Phone Use on Building Community.” Student Affairs<br />
Online, 2003, 4, from http://studentaffairs.com/ejournal/Fall_2003/CellPhones.html. Retrieved Nov. 4, 2003.
52 <br />
opportunity to remain in close contact <strong>with</strong> previous friends and family, it can become an<br />
obstacle to students developing friendships and community where they live. E-ties need<br />
to “…supplement not supplant face-to-face connections.” 141<br />
Research by Jean Twenge shows that this <strong>new</strong> ‘Gen Me’ generation (born<br />
1982-2000-something) does not just question authority, they disrespect authority entirely.<br />
“Gen Me trusts no one, suggesting a culture growing ever more toward disconnection and<br />
away from close communities. Trusting no one and relying on your self is a self-fulfilling<br />
prophecy in an individualistic world where the prevailing sentiment is ‘Do unto others<br />
be<strong>for</strong>e they do it to you.’” 142 Relationship stands at the heart of mentoring. If authority<br />
fails to be even respected, often mentoring can bridge that gap by building trust and<br />
confidence so that learning can be passed on <strong>with</strong>out coming across as “an authority.”<br />
Through the mentoring process the needs and issues that women encounter or deal <strong>with</strong><br />
come to the light and can be faced, addressed, and hopefully healed. Otherwise, the need<br />
<strong>for</strong> professional counseling can be determined and recommended.<br />
Many women have gained knowledge, experience, and insights from their life<br />
experiences. They need to share what they have learned <strong>with</strong> those who come after them<br />
to enhance the future of the next generation. In Donna Otto’s book on mentoring, she<br />
explains,<br />
A heart <strong>for</strong> God, a teachable spirit, the Lord’s perspective on time, a solid<br />
knowledge of their faith, the ability and boldness to share their beliefs, a<br />
commitment to people, a warm hospitality <strong>for</strong> all who come their way, a loving<br />
availability, and an accepting, affirming spirit – these are the traits of the woman<br />
of God, the Titus woman, the older woman who can make a difference <strong>for</strong> God’s<br />
kingdom by passing on His truth and His values to the next generation. 143<br />
141 Broido, Serving the Millennial Generation, 91.<br />
142 Jean M. Twenge, Generation Me: Why Today’s Young Americans Are More Confident,<br />
Assertive, Entitled – and More Miserable Than Ever Be<strong>for</strong>e, (New York, NY: Free Press, 2006), 28, 36.<br />
2001), 120-121.<br />
143 Donna Otto, Finding a Mentor, Being A Mentor (Eugene, OR: Harvest House Publishers,
53 <br />
A mentor needs to address every area of a mentoree’s life, <strong>for</strong> women need<br />
help in a variety of areas, whether it be relational, spiritual, emotional, or even physical.<br />
The Apostle Paul exhorts believers when he says, “And concerning you my brethren, I<br />
myself also am convinced that you yourselves are full of goodness, filled <strong>with</strong> all<br />
knowledge and able also to admonish [counsel/ mentor] one another” (Romans 15:14).<br />
Whether mentoring is <strong>for</strong>mal or in<strong>for</strong>mal, the relationships still involve trust,<br />
commitment, communication, and time to know and be known by another person.<br />
Mentoring means connecting <strong>with</strong> other women who will be a resource and<br />
encouragement <strong>for</strong> one’s career, faith, relationships, and life development. Duff<br />
emphasizes the importance of women connecting when she says, “When women come<br />
together <strong>for</strong> the purpose of connecting as women and sharing who they are <strong>with</strong> one<br />
another, we create an opportunity to discover ourselves and who we can become.” 144<br />
Robert Lewis adds his insight about mentoring and women today:<br />
…to correct the course many women are on today…What is needed is a<br />
multitude of wise mentors. Some women are already doing this, but we need<br />
more. I believe younger women would love <strong>for</strong> older, life-smart woman to step<br />
<strong>for</strong>ward and courageously speak into the confusion and empty rhetoric of much of<br />
today’s modern femininity and offer rock-solid ways to build a life. They yearn<br />
<strong>for</strong> the life coaches…women who can point them to a life that is not only sensible<br />
and satisfying (Titus 2:5) but one that can go the distance <strong>with</strong>out pulling up<br />
somewhere lame <strong>with</strong> regret. 145<br />
As a woman grows in her knowledge of God and His Word in an<br />
intergenerational mentoring relationship, a good older mentor will impart skills and<br />
wisdom acquired through experience while nurturing the younger mentoree’s innate gifts<br />
and abilities. It is said of Teresa of Avila in her mentoring relationship <strong>with</strong> Jeronimo<br />
Gratian that, “…likely at that stage in her life she also needed to share what she had<br />
learned <strong>with</strong> someone younger and less experienced. Both individuals benefited from the<br />
144 Duff, Learning From Other Women, 139.<br />
145 Lewis, The New Eve, 13.
54 <br />
interchange that occurred.” 146 Leona English adds from her research on Teresa of Avila<br />
some desired characteristics of a mentor:<br />
In general, the person is more experienced, willing to take on the role of<br />
mentor, and considered to be a model person <strong>for</strong> assisting others….The mentor<br />
chosen by the protégé/[mentoree] had a common vision <strong>with</strong> the<br />
protégé/[mentoree] and was capable of assisting him or her in fulfilling a<br />
dream….Perfection is also not a qualification, but experience and willingness to<br />
give time and assistance are. 147<br />
As Leona English studied the life of Teresa of Avila, she examined the<br />
mentoring relationships that occurred between Teresa and such individuals as Peter of<br />
Alcantara, St. John of the Cross, and Jeronimo Gratian. Peter of Alcantara is described as<br />
being an elderly Franciscan, “an old man of about sixty” says Teresa in her book Life<br />
(XXVII, 16-17). Teresa was fifty-two years of age and St. John of the Cross was twentyfive,<br />
while Jeronimo Gratian was thirty, and she was sixty by the time they met. 148 These<br />
relationships demonstrate the value of intergenerational mentoring.<br />
Robert Lewis uses Barbara Bush as an example to emphasize the powerful<br />
influence older women can have on the lives of younger women when he relates this<br />
story:<br />
Years ago Barbara Bush, first lady of [<strong>for</strong>mer] President George Bush, was<br />
invited to give the commencement address at the all-female Wellesley<br />
College….Her acceptance un<strong>for</strong>tunately stirred up a furor. The modern Wellesley<br />
girls could not imagine what Mrs. Bush could offer them. She was clearly too old,<br />
too traditional, and too yesterday to have anything relevant to say to them. The<br />
first lady didn’t flinch. Drawing on experience, proven wisdom, and a big-picture<br />
perspective of life, she spoke to the students about making wise choices. Here’s<br />
part of what she had to say: ‘The…choice that must not be missed [as a woman] is<br />
to cherish your human connections; your relationships <strong>with</strong> family and<br />
friends.…At the end of your life, you will never regret not having passed one<br />
more test, not winning one more verdict or not closing one more deal. You will<br />
146 Leona English. “The Tradition of Teresa of Avila and Its Implications <strong>for</strong> Mentoring of<br />
Religious Educators,” Religious Education 91: (1996), 99.<br />
147 Ibid., 98.<br />
148 English, Religious Education 91, 91, 92, 94.
55 <br />
regret time not spent <strong>with</strong> a husband, a child, a friend or a parent.’ Real<br />
womanhood is about choosing wisely. 149<br />
This is an example of an older, more life-experienced woman mentoring a younger<br />
generation of women albeit in a large non-intimate setting.<br />
Author Jeanne Hendricks, in A Woman <strong>for</strong> All Seasons, comments on the lack<br />
of value society places on the older generation when saying,<br />
Our society has brainwashed us <strong>with</strong> the falsehood that old women are<br />
useless. So often, when they can no longer work the eight-to-five shift, or at least<br />
run the vacuum cleaner, we set them in a rocking chair in front of the television<br />
set. There their minds become removed from reality, duped, and deteriorated. We<br />
feed them tranquilizers, waiting <strong>for</strong> some vital organ to lapse, hoping they will<br />
slip away ‘<strong>with</strong>out suffering.’ What a waste of wisdom and vitality! 150<br />
This could remain the sad state of affairs of the twenty-first century if value is not placed<br />
on intergenerational opportunities. For the first time in history there exists seven<br />
generations living at the same time. The younger generations need to take advantage of<br />
the opportunity and rare privilege to learn, glean, and benefit from the life experiences<br />
and wisdom of those from generations who have gone be<strong>for</strong>e them. And the older<br />
generations still have the opportunity to use their gifts and experience to impact, nurture,<br />
and encourage a younger generation.<br />
Donna Otto makes this relevant statement from a conversation <strong>with</strong> Elisabeth<br />
Elliot Gren who said, “‘The retirement years present us <strong>with</strong> serious temptations – to<br />
idleness, to self-indulgence, to pampering. This is a colossal waste of God-given gifts.<br />
God has given wisdom, strength, experience – and He is giving us the gift of old age.’<br />
Hearing Elisabeth’s comment, I couldn’t help wondering why older women aren’t<br />
seeking out younger women more today.” 151 The older woman can encourage the<br />
149 Barbara Bush’s commencement address is available from the Wellesley Website,<br />
http://www.wellesley,edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1990/bush.html Robert Lewis. The New Eve.<br />
(Nashville: B&H Publishing Group, 2008), 83.<br />
150 Jeanne Hendricks, A Woman <strong>for</strong> All Seasons (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, Inc., 1977), 92.<br />
151 Otto, Finding a Mentor, Being A Mentor, 136.
56 <br />
younger woman and help her to see that she can survive the struggles that life presents.<br />
Through sharing conversation, life experiences, and faith, the older woman can help the<br />
younger woman learn how to live a life that honors God. By the very fact that the older<br />
woman has lived through many of the challenges that the younger woman now faces she<br />
can give the younger woman hope and encouragement that she, too, can endure and<br />
survive.<br />
If we seek to address the needs and issues of women through mentoring while<br />
they attend seminary, possibly we can have the opportunity to change the societal trends<br />
of not valuing older generations. Tapping into the wisdom and experiences of older<br />
people can contribute towards developing healthier and stronger workers <strong>for</strong> God’s<br />
Kingdom. Being a spiritual and trusted mentor <strong>for</strong> a woman seminarian provides the<br />
opportunity to instill Christ-confidence so that when she leaves seminary she can face the<br />
world more effectively, efficiently, and eagerly <strong>for</strong> the Lord. Mentoring offers an<br />
excellent way to invest in a female student’s life and contribute to the building up of<br />
God’s Kingdom. Donna Otto summarizes <strong>with</strong> this statement, “Having our heavenly<br />
Father’s perspective on time also means realizing that we are to invest in the next<br />
generation of His people.” 152<br />
Peer Mentoring<br />
Unlike the older woman mentor as described in Titus 2, peer mentors are often<br />
the same age, or close to the same age and are in similar life circumstances. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />
peer mentors can share needed in<strong>for</strong>mation, encouragement, and insights into their<br />
common experiences. Peer mentors tend to be close friends as those who share age and<br />
stages of life, family and circumstances. Peer mentors can help one another get into the<br />
152 Ibid.,117.
57 <br />
swing of an environment by sharing what they observe and what they learn from their<br />
colleagues’ experiences. 153<br />
David G. Benner, in his book Sacred Companions, emphasizes that “deep<br />
knowing of self and God requires deep knowing of and by others. Intimate relationships<br />
<strong>with</strong> others prepare us <strong>for</strong> intimacy <strong>with</strong> God.” 154 The Christian doctrine of the Trinity<br />
places connected otherness at the very heart of the nature of God. Bev Hislop, in<br />
Shepherding a Woman’s Heart, recommends that “it is time to consider the directive of<br />
Titus in light of the increased emotional and spiritual needs of women.” 155 She makes the<br />
following suggestions:<br />
…Given today’s societal and historical changes, what women face today<br />
necessitates care specific to the needs of women along <strong>with</strong> relevant biblical<br />
input….To be effective in shepherding women we must be responsive to a<br />
woman’s gender-specific characteristics, behaviors, and needs. To do that, we<br />
must understand what those characteristics are and how they are unique to<br />
women, and that includes looking at the physiological, psychological aspects of a<br />
woman’s life as well as identifying the characteristics of a woman’s cognition and<br />
communication. Women bring deeper understanding to women <strong>with</strong> the<br />
physiological issues that define womanhood. Who can understand the pain of<br />
childbirth but someone who has also pushed, cried, screamed, and rejoiced?...<br />
Menopause symptoms do not sound reasonable to someone who has not<br />
repeatedly wakened in the middle of the night soaked – and startled resulting in<br />
serious sleep deprivation. 156<br />
Gail Sheehy’s work New Passages: Mapping Your Life Across Time, provides<br />
a comprehensive model of understanding the life cycles <strong>for</strong> men and women individually.<br />
Sheehy makes the point that throughout each decade of life, women process differently<br />
than men, although that difference will vary across the life map. Women’s pastoral care<br />
153 Duff, Learning From Other Women, 124.<br />
154 David G. Benner, Sacred Companions: The Gift of Spiritual Friendship and Direction<br />
(Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2002), 41.<br />
155 Hislop, Shepherding a Woman’s Heart, 85.<br />
156 Ibid., 85, 58, 61.
58 <br />
and nurture needs to be responsible to pay attention to being able to provide that care in a<br />
truly effective and specific way. 157<br />
Beverly Hislop states that relationships are a primary concern <strong>for</strong> women. This<br />
difference between pastoral care to women and pastoral care to men has been observed in<br />
counseling settings and Hislop has determined the following list of those differences:<br />
1. Women, single and married, struggle more <strong>with</strong> relational issues than<br />
men.<br />
2. Women usually want support and understanding.<br />
3. Women feel excessively responsible <strong>for</strong> others.<br />
4. Women put feelings be<strong>for</strong>e thoughts.<br />
5. Women manage stress <strong>with</strong> a relational response. 158<br />
In A Woman’s Search <strong>for</strong> Worth, Dr. Deborah Newman explored the<br />
definition of womanhood. She asked women the question, “What do you enjoy most<br />
about being a woman?” She found that most women responded “by saying they like the<br />
depth and warmth, the connectedness, of their relationships. They like that they know<br />
what is going on in the lives of their spouses, children, friends, mothers, and others. By in<br />
large, women cocoon themselves in an intricately woven fabric of relationships…. Most<br />
of us define womanhood by our relationships.” 159 Goodman and O’Brien add,<br />
“Friendship matters to women; it matters a lot; women today – <strong>with</strong> lives often in<br />
transition – depend on friends more than ever. Many who once believed family was the<br />
center of life, <strong>with</strong> every myth and movie and fairy tale having the same married-happilyever-after<br />
ending, now know that friends may be the difference between a lonely life and<br />
157 Gail Sheehy, New Passages: Mapping Your Life Across Time (New York: Ballantine,<br />
1995), 11-13.<br />
158 Hislop, Shepherding a Woman’s Heart, 67-72.<br />
159 Deborah Newman, A Woman’s Search <strong>for</strong> Worth. (Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House<br />
Publishers, 2002), 19-20.
59 <br />
a lively one.” 160 This expressed the essence of friendship and should also be said of and<br />
experienced in the mentoring relationships between women.<br />
Stanley and Clinton reserve a whole chapter in their book Connecting, to peermentoring.<br />
Their description of peer mentors is: “…We see peers as mentors of one<br />
another….They are the same age and share more common experiences…” 161 They go on<br />
to say that peer mentors are “…more relaxed, relevant, and open <strong>with</strong> one<br />
another….These qualities in the relationship…enable peers to stimulate, interact, and<br />
hold one another accountable at a more personal level.” 162 Stanley and Clinton<br />
summarize by recommending a “circle of accountability”…and note that the “loneranger”<br />
approach leads to spiritual ill-health. They state that “we need a balance of three<br />
types of mentoring relationships: 1.) Upward mentors…who have gone be<strong>for</strong>e and can<br />
show the way; 2.) Downward mentors…who shake our complacency, re<strong>new</strong> our<br />
convictions, refreshingly keep us on our toes, and multiply our ministry <strong>for</strong> His<br />
Kingdom; and 3.) Peer co-mentors…who know us, identify <strong>with</strong> us and provide mutual<br />
stimulation and personal accountability.” 163<br />
In the corporate and business world researchers have found that peer<br />
mentoring adapts well to today’s work climate. Normally these peer mentors are close to<br />
the same age. They embrace peer mentoring because they prefer to see each other as a<br />
team. For many women today, peer mentoring helps women keep going from day to day<br />
and enable them to fit into a system women didn’t create. 164 In the seminary setting peer<br />
mentors have the opportunity to share <strong>with</strong> other students from their mutual seminary<br />
160 Ellen Goodman and Patricia O’Brien, I Know Just What You Mean (New York: Simon and<br />
Schuster, 2000), 12.<br />
161 Stanley and Clinton, Connecting, 166-67.<br />
162 Ibid., 166.<br />
163 Ibid., 167.<br />
164 Duff, Learning From Other Women, 124, 127.
60 <br />
experiences and offer encouragement and help as they adjust into the unique<br />
circumstances and challenges of seminary life. Peer mentors can be confidants,<br />
counselors, and coaches <strong>for</strong> one another. As the peer relationships evolve and become<br />
more personal and committed, the peers can offer one another affirmation,<br />
encouragement, confirmation, emotional support, personal feedback and friendship.<br />
Multi-Cultural Mentoring<br />
According to Christian values and beliefs, mentoring is appropriate <strong>for</strong> any<br />
culture or ethnicity. Though the methodology of mentoring might have to be adapted <strong>for</strong><br />
different cultures, the goal or desired results remain the same <strong>for</strong> anyone of any culture.<br />
The common goal of mentoring is <strong>for</strong> growth, trans<strong>for</strong>mation, and healing through<br />
gaining insights, knowledge, and relationship <strong>with</strong> another Christian. In The Negro<br />
Educational Review, from an article entitled “Race Still Matters: Considerations <strong>for</strong><br />
Mentoring Black Women in Academe,” the researchers concluded that “whether the<br />
mentor is Black or White, male or female is unimportant. What is more important is that<br />
the mentor is genuine and seeks to assist the protégé in having a successful academic<br />
career.” 165 At the same time, research indicates that female needs may sometimes differ<br />
related to ethnicity. Two of the largest ethnic groups attending DTS are the black<br />
international students and African Americans and the Asian international students. In<br />
African American Pastoral Care, author Edward P. Wimberly states that “children born<br />
after 1960 feel less parented than those of previous generations. Within the African<br />
American community, the foundations of the black extended family are crumbling,<br />
single-parent families are on the increase, and even in a two-parent home, both must<br />
165 Sharon L. Holmes, Lynette Danley Land, and Veronica D Hinton-Hudson, “Race Still<br />
Matters: Considerations <strong>for</strong> Mentoring,” The Negro Education Review, Vol. 58, nos.1-2 (Spring/Summer,<br />
2007): 121.
61 <br />
work if the family is to survive economically which contributes to the feeling of not<br />
being adequately parented.” 166 The major tasks of young adulthood, now, more than ever<br />
be<strong>for</strong>e, require making important life choices <strong>with</strong>out having had good role models or<br />
stable family conditions. These choices include deciding how to survive economically,<br />
decisions regarding marriage (or not), whether or not to establish a family, and making<br />
choices regarding what role faith and religion will play in life.<br />
When giving pastoral care to the African American, Wimberly makes the<br />
important point that one should take narrative (telling personal stories) seriously, <strong>with</strong> the<br />
specific task of narrative pastoral care <strong>with</strong> these young adults. He holds the view that<br />
pastoral care to this ethnic group needs to include establishing an atmosphere in which<br />
young adults feel free to share their stories. This type of pastoral care that includes<br />
narrative helps to enable the young adult to share what it is like to face the outside world<br />
and enables them to discern God’s presence and story working in his or her life. “Stories<br />
function in the caring setting to bring healing and wholeness to the lives of persons and<br />
families <strong>with</strong>in the black pastoral-care context.” 167 The major concern <strong>for</strong> the future is to<br />
maintain the indigenous, spontaneous <strong>for</strong>m of caring through stories that exist in the<br />
African American tradition. 168 Henry Mitchell and Nicholas Lewter call these types of<br />
stories soul theology, which is the core belief-system that gives shape to the world, and<br />
shows how African American people have come to grips <strong>with</strong> the world in a meaningful<br />
way. 169 Female African American students and the black international female students<br />
57-58.<br />
166 Edward P. Wimberly, African American Pastoral Care (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1991),<br />
167 Ibid., 11.<br />
168 Ibid., 104, 105.<br />
11.<br />
169 Henry Mitchell and Nicholas Lewter, Soul Theology (New York: Harper & Row, 1986),
62 <br />
struggle <strong>with</strong> many issues and need to have the specific care, nurture, and mentoring that<br />
includes narrative to help them through this crucial stage in their lives.<br />
Women of different cultures or ethnic groups will need to assess their<br />
connection <strong>with</strong> their mentor and be sure there exists understanding and a perceptive<br />
attitude concerning cultural or ethnic differences. Carolyn Duff makes these observations<br />
about intercultural mentoring relationships:<br />
Women of color need one another, not only to advance one another’s careers,<br />
but <strong>for</strong> emotional and relationship support as well. A woman named Nicole, an<br />
African American woman and experienced management consultant…explained:<br />
‘African American women are bicultural. The members of this group are<br />
American by nature and African American by nurture. We come together as a<br />
group to acknowledge and protect the “inner me,” the self voice inside that tells<br />
me what I need to be about.’<br />
Women of particular races or ethnicities...give women of non-Eurocentric<br />
backgrounds places to come together and learn from one another how to succeed<br />
in their bicultural lives and careers. 170<br />
When working <strong>with</strong>, counseling or mentoring an individual from another<br />
cultural background, one must take into consideration what has normative relevance <strong>for</strong><br />
that culture. Wimberly, believes that the Bible can be especially effective when used to<br />
facilitate growth in the lives of African American Christians who grew up in a Christian<br />
environment where Bible stories were normative <strong>for</strong> making sense out of life. He<br />
concludes, “The major concern <strong>for</strong> the future is to maintain the indigenous, spontaneous<br />
<strong>for</strong>m of caring through stories that exist in the African American tradition. However, we<br />
can learn to preserve and enhance this tradition through studying the emerging literature<br />
on storytelling. We need to take pride that the academic and professional world of<br />
counseling is rediscovering what already was a full-blown tradition in African American<br />
culture. 171 170 Duff, Learning From Other Women, 147, 148<br />
Press, 1994), 15, 104-105.<br />
171 Edward P. Wimberly, Using Scripture in Pastoral Counseling, (Nashville: Abingdon
63 <br />
Dipa Hart, a DTS alum, in her chapter in Preparing <strong>for</strong> Ministry: A Practical<br />
Guide to Theological Field Education, comments on the need <strong>for</strong> intercultural training<br />
and conversation in master’s level schools. She observes, “In America, few masters-level<br />
schools in general (not just seminaries) offer <strong>for</strong>mal classes to dialogue about race or<br />
cultural issues or challenge students during their educational activities to develop<br />
emotionally mature responses that reflect God and not just guilt <strong>for</strong> the sins of their<br />
<strong>for</strong>efathers.” 172 Hart goes on to say,<br />
Unbalanced student development will produce leaders who are unable to<br />
biblically analyze their experiences or to engage in meaningful conversation; as<br />
these leaders minister, they may cause <strong>new</strong>er believers to flee from their families<br />
and cultures and replicate again a great tragic fact of missions history….Balanced<br />
development should maintain a continuous dialogue between experiences and<br />
relationships on the one hand and Scripture and theology on the other. 173<br />
Any mentoring program needs to take into consideration cultural and ethnic differences.<br />
Even though it may be true that most women face similar personal issues, cultural<br />
backgrounds often play into how those issues are manifested and how they need to be<br />
addressed. A seminary should be sensitive to the differences in their female students and<br />
know how to best meet the needs of each individual student.<br />
Mentoring in Academia<br />
The development of mentoring programs has become an important goal in<br />
many academic institutions. Mirka Koro-Ljungberg and Sharon Hayes reported in the<br />
journal Mentoring and Tutoring, that in some university documents, mentoring is defined<br />
as a “relationship [that] has both in<strong>for</strong>mal and <strong>for</strong>mal components. Mentoring may be<br />
best carried out through a series of casual office visits, lunch discussions about the<br />
172 Dipa Hart, “Field Education and Cultural Awareness,” in Preparing <strong>for</strong> Ministry: A<br />
Practical Guide to Theological Field Education, ed. George Hillman, (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel<br />
Publications, 2008), 80.<br />
173 Ibid., 86.
64 <br />
challenges and opportunities presented by academic life.” 174 They offer these insights<br />
from their research:<br />
Lipschutz (1993) argues that mentoring graduate students goes beyond merely<br />
advising them. In the context of a graduate school, mentorship assumes a respect<br />
<strong>for</strong> students as sources of ideas and insights (e.g. coauthoring papers) and means<br />
of offering students timely and constructive responses to their work, modeling the<br />
values of the discipline, and demonstrating a concern <strong>for</strong> their professional<br />
welfare. For Lipschutz (1993), mentoring is a valuing, trans<strong>for</strong>ming relationship<br />
in which the mentor is actively invested and aware of the responsibilities he or she<br />
assumes <strong>for</strong> shaping the mentee’s knowledge, perceptions, and behaviors. 175<br />
Whether it is an individual one-to-one mentoring relationship or an affinity<br />
group, women in academia seek other women <strong>for</strong> connection to gain wisdom from those<br />
who have gone be<strong>for</strong>e them. These connections help to develop relationships in which<br />
women benefit from each other. Carolyn Duff reports that women across the country,<br />
from Florida to Oregon, come together in a variety of places to <strong>for</strong>m giving and learning<br />
communities. She says that women <strong>for</strong>m groups around age and stage, single-parent<br />
issues, advocacy <strong>for</strong> older parents, lifestyle values, spiritual searches, and career shifts.<br />
Duff makes this statement, “We learn from one another and we give to one another. We<br />
approach life as a whole, knowing the interconnectedness of all our decisions. We seek<br />
one another’s wisdom as we continue composing our lives.” 176<br />
Formal training begins in seminaries <strong>for</strong> anyone who feels called to Christian<br />
service or wants to expand his or her biblical and theological knowledge and<br />
understanding. Whether a pastor, a Bible study teacher, a youth director, a missionary, a<br />
male or female, everyone needs the input of the older or more experienced to help them<br />
in the on-going <strong>for</strong>mation, preparation, and education <strong>for</strong> a life of ministry. In Christian<br />
174 Mirka Koro-Ljungberg and Sharon Hayes, “The Relational Selves of Female Graduate<br />
Students During Academic Mentoring: From Dialogue to Trans<strong>for</strong>mation,” Mentoring and Tutoring.<br />
University of Florida Press 14, no. 4 (November 2006): 390.<br />
175 Ibid., 390.<br />
176 Duff, Learning From Other Women, 153.
65 <br />
communities, Brian Williams has this to say about the value of mentoring in preparation<br />
<strong>for</strong> Christian ministry:<br />
Mentoring <strong>for</strong> pastoral <strong>for</strong>mation…can refer to the diverse array of <strong>for</strong>mal<br />
relationships and in<strong>for</strong>mal friendships in which older or more experience pastors,<br />
priests, or ministers offer their eyes, ears, voice, and hands to younger or less<br />
experienced pastors in order to help them explore the overlapping contours of<br />
who they are in Christ and what they are called to do <strong>for</strong> Christ. This is the<br />
overlap of their being and their thinking under the indigenous pressures,<br />
responsibilities, and tasks of doing pastoral ministry – when they intentionally<br />
participate in the ongoing <strong>for</strong>mation, preparation, and education of fellow pastors<br />
at uniquely critical moments in their lives, when they are learning how to do and<br />
to be and to think… Careful support of <strong>new</strong> ministers both in seminary and<br />
immediately following is crucial to continue this process of <strong>for</strong>mation and<br />
maturation <strong>for</strong> ministry… 177<br />
Students who have mentors and peer mentors while in seminary can begin the<br />
process of developing their interpersonal skills and insights beyond just academic<br />
knowledge. Williams wisely says, “No one asks <strong>for</strong> a thesis or essay – even though we<br />
may give it to them sometimes. They ask <strong>for</strong> words that speak God’s grace and God’s<br />
grandeur, words that open up space <strong>for</strong> them to repent and pray, worship and act. Words<br />
and actions that <strong>for</strong>m the un<strong>for</strong>med and fill the unfilled, that speak and enact creation into<br />
chaos.” 178 Leona English and Lorna Bowman add:<br />
In theological education today it is recognised (sic) that students in seminaries<br />
and schools of theology have special needs that can best be met by a mentor. One<br />
of the biggest issues they face is that they come there 'in order to leave' (Sheldrake<br />
1998: 3), meaning that such schools are transitional spaces, not lifetime homes.<br />
The transitional question is 'where am I' and the identity question is 'who am I and<br />
where should I be' (p. 3). Engaging these questions requires a certain amount of<br />
support that a mentor may indeed be able to provide. Since many theology<br />
students are older, they come <strong>with</strong> many life experiences. For them there are large<br />
questions of transition and identity. Sheldrake says there is also the struggle to<br />
'come to terms <strong>with</strong> the ordinary' (p. 5) or the fact that you, your colleagues and<br />
your professors are just regular people. Another issue is <strong>with</strong> leaving and moving<br />
on to other places, placements and jobs.…Mentors in the guise of spiritual<br />
177 Williams, The Potter’s Rib, 55, 56.<br />
178 Ibid., 57.
66 <br />
directors, faculty advisors, theological education field supervisors and others are<br />
often in a unique position to help students negotiate these issues. 179<br />
Mentors come alongside and offer grace and acceptance to students in the<br />
midst of their <strong>for</strong>mal training. This allows students the safety and space to experience the<br />
very things that they will need to offer others after their seminary training ends. Williams<br />
notes, “We take <strong>with</strong> us into ministry all that we are, all the patterns of thinking and<br />
being that we have developed over the course of our lives.” 180 In addition, Williams<br />
continues,<br />
The need <strong>for</strong> this has not gone entirely unnoticed by the theological academy.<br />
Mentoring <strong>for</strong> pastoral <strong>for</strong>mation still occurs, or is at least attempted, in the<br />
current structure of our seminaries. Many seminaries and Bible colleges, in at<br />
least the last thirty years or so, have developed required programs of ‘supervised<br />
ministry internships,’ which attempt to make <strong>for</strong>mal provision <strong>for</strong> the kind of<br />
mentoring <strong>for</strong> pastoral <strong>for</strong>mation we are considering here. These internships<br />
usually take place near the end of a student’s course of academic study, when a<br />
student is invited to participate in the ongoing life of a particular ministering and<br />
worshipping community. 181<br />
This type of mentoring remains essential <strong>for</strong> the development and training of seminarians<br />
who prepare to go into Christian ministry regardless of what type of ministry context it<br />
might be.<br />
Dietrich Bonhoeffer is known <strong>for</strong> his love, concern, and attention to the need<br />
<strong>for</strong> the nurture and care of his seminarians. In his book Spiritual Care, Bonhoeffer insists<br />
that in the church people must offer one another the kind of support and encouragement<br />
they each need. Williams notes this about Bonhoeffer, “In Bonhoeffer they initially met<br />
an intelligent man <strong>with</strong> an acute theological mind, yet they [students at Finkenwald] soon<br />
experienced relationship <strong>with</strong> a humble man, ever willing it seemed to explore the<br />
complexity of calling or discuss the meaning of Sacrament, a man prepared to journey<br />
179 English and Bowman, British Journal of Theological Education 12, 40-56.<br />
180 Williams, The Potter’s Rib, 59.<br />
181 Ibid., 59.
67 <br />
<strong>with</strong> them in faith at a time when maintaining faithful witness was a difficult and<br />
dangerous cross to bear.” 182 And Bonhoeffer said of himself and his ministry to others,<br />
“God does not want me to mold others into the image that seems good to me, that is, into<br />
my own image. Instead, in their freedom from me, God made other people in God’s<br />
image. I can never know in advance how God’s image should appear in others. That<br />
image always takes on a completely <strong>new</strong> and unique <strong>for</strong>m.” 183 Bonhoeffer clearly<br />
articulates the definition of a mentor and the goals of a mentor.<br />
English and Bowman recognize the importance “to examine the value of<br />
mentoring relationships <strong>for</strong> the purposes of teaching and ministerial <strong>for</strong>mation in schools<br />
of theology and seminaries <strong>for</strong> both women and men, faculty and students.” 184 They have<br />
observed the following:<br />
Many religious traditions find that they have an increasing number of female<br />
students, often in excess of 50 per cent of the student body whether or not the<br />
denomination ordains women. Yet the majority of faculty members continue to be<br />
men (Bowman 1999). It seems simple enough to expect that candidates <strong>for</strong><br />
ministry, or those who teach them, experience a caring and supportive<br />
environment that nurtures both their spiritual and intellectual life.….In<strong>for</strong>mal<br />
mentoring may or may not occur, suggesting the need <strong>for</strong> more <strong>for</strong>malized (sic)<br />
mentoring to provide support, teaching, counseling (sic), nurturing, and role<br />
modeling (sic) to occur (see English 1996)…. Mentorship is a particular need <strong>for</strong><br />
women in theological education. Women are in particular need of support and<br />
nurturing both to increase their registration in, and completion of, graduate study<br />
in theology and religion. 185<br />
Dr. Joye Baker, a professor of Christian Education at <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary,<br />
concurs <strong>with</strong> English and Bowman. In her chapter in Preparing <strong>for</strong> Ministry, she<br />
182 Williams, The Potter’s Rib, 249.<br />
183 Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Life Together, (New York: Harper and Row Publishers, 1954), 95.<br />
184 English and Bowman, British Journal of Theological Education 12, 49-56.<br />
185 Ibid., 49-56.
68 <br />
emphasizes the importance of female mentors <strong>for</strong> women students. Through her research<br />
and experience working <strong>with</strong> women during their internships, Baker offers specific ways<br />
<strong>for</strong> mentors to best address the needs of female students. 186<br />
One-on-mentoring serves a unique role in the student’s development during the<br />
entire time that a student is in his or her academic training. The amount of time that a<br />
seminarian attends <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary varies from two years to four or more depending on<br />
the degree plan and the rate at which a student takes the required courses. At <strong>Dallas</strong><br />
Seminary, the time limit <strong>for</strong> completion of the Master of Arts (M.A.) program is seven<br />
years and eight years <strong>for</strong> the Master of Theology (Th. M.) program. All coursework <strong>for</strong><br />
the Master of Sacred Theology (S.T.M.) and Certificate of Graduate Study (C.G.S.)<br />
programs must be finished <strong>with</strong>in three years. 187 Given the number of years that a<br />
seminarian is available <strong>for</strong> interaction <strong>with</strong> a mentor, the opportunity is obviously great,<br />
and valuable learning and experience can be obtained beyond the <strong>for</strong>mal academic<br />
classroom environment. It is to this end that this research study is aimed.<br />
Personal Issues of Seminary Women<br />
In addition to the research on mentoring, this literature review also<br />
investigates the specific personal needs and issues of female seminarians. Seminary<br />
women share many common things <strong>with</strong> all Christian women, but while they attend<br />
seminary these women have specific needs that surface due to the academic, social and<br />
emotional foci, stress, and demands of their training <strong>for</strong> ministry. Counselor and author,<br />
Dr. Deborah Newman, offers this observation from her many years of counseling<br />
regarding women’s issues: “If we boiled down every problem of every women who ever<br />
sat across from me in the counseling office, we would find one common bond: Women’s<br />
186 Joye B. Baker, “Working With Women Students in Field Education,” in Preparing <strong>for</strong><br />
Ministry: A Practical Guide to Theological Field Education, ed., George Hillman, (Grand Rapids, MI:<br />
Kregel Publications, 2008), 233-253.<br />
187 <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary Student Handbook (<strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary, 2008), 9.
69 <br />
problems are centered in their relationships as they seek to control the hurt they<br />
experience from them.” 188<br />
We live in a broken and sin-filled world. There<strong>for</strong>e, though God created<br />
people <strong>with</strong> a need <strong>for</strong> connection, intimacy and relationships, relationships often cause<br />
hurt, havoc, and problems. This study sought to isolate some of the most common issues<br />
that women seminarians experience. Women face a vast number of different and unique<br />
personal issues, but two major issues seem to surface most frequently. These are: (1)<br />
loneliness due to isolation, and (2) depression.<br />
Loneliness and Isolation<br />
Dianna Booher, in her book Well-Connected, makes this observation from her<br />
research:<br />
The last century began <strong>with</strong> unity and ended <strong>with</strong> isolation. The single most<br />
significant change in our culture has been the way we communicate <strong>with</strong> and<br />
relate to each other. And that change has affected our spirits and purposes. The<br />
typical American watches twenty-eight hours of television each week. Add to that<br />
mix computer time and you understand why we no longer have time <strong>for</strong><br />
relationships. Even our phone calls and personal letters have given way to e-<br />
mail. 189<br />
Christianity Today, in an article entitled, “Look at All the Lonely People: A Radically<br />
Old Way to Reach Out to a Friendless Culture,” states that “our isolation has increased,<br />
leaving us a higher risk <strong>for</strong> a host of physical, social, and psychological ailments.<br />
Certainly, the pressure to isolate ourselves is longstanding in our increasingly fragmented<br />
society based on the radical autonomy of the individual.” 190 This article indicates that<br />
people desire to seek deep and meaningful friendships, but that the experience of<br />
1997), 72.<br />
188 Deborah Newman, Then God Created Woman (Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House Publishers,<br />
189 Dianna Booher, Well-Connected: Power Your Own Soul by Plugging Into Others<br />
(Nashville: Word Publishing, 2000), 2.<br />
190 “Look at All the Lonely People,” Christianity Today, November 2006, 31.
70 <br />
significant relationships is shriveling. With the shrinking experience of having deeper,<br />
more intimate relationships, it is no wonder that: “…More and more Americans are<br />
starving <strong>for</strong> significant relationships.” 191 Christianity Today reports, “Earlier this year,<br />
the American Sociological Review published a disturbing study, ‘Social Isolation in<br />
America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks Over Two Decades.’ Researchers Miller<br />
McPherson, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and Matthew E. Brashears reported a ‘remarkable drop’<br />
in the size of people’s core network of confidants – those <strong>with</strong> whom they could talk<br />
about important matters.” 192<br />
So many people struggle <strong>with</strong> loneliness that Discipleship Journal focused an<br />
entire issue on the topic. In his article, Peter Pintus wrote, “Loneliness is not a respecter<br />
of persons. It can strike anyone, anytime, or anywhere.” 193 Author Stephen Burns reports<br />
that, “Studies reveal that loneliness, as closely as can be defined, affects more that 75<br />
percent of the population. Directly or indirectly, it can be responsible <strong>for</strong> suicide,<br />
depression, insomnia, and various other maladies. If loneliness isn’t the chief disease of<br />
North American culture, it has to be near the top of the list. And sadly, these findings are<br />
as true <strong>for</strong> people in the church as <strong>for</strong> those who are not.” 194 Similarly, in her extensive<br />
study of Generation Me, Jean Twenge discovered that both depression and loneliness are<br />
very commonplace in today’s culture. Her study further revealed “…another surprising<br />
finding: when you were born had more influence on one’s anxiety level than one’s<br />
individual family environment.” 195 Twenge further states about her own friends in their<br />
191 Ibid., 31.<br />
192 Ibid.<br />
193 Peter Pintus, “At the Heart of Loneliness” Discipleship Journal, December, 2007, 35.<br />
44.<br />
194 Stephen Burns, “What’s a Lonely Person to Do?” Discipleship Journal, December 2007,<br />
195 Twenge, Generation Me, 107.
71 <br />
early thirties, “These are college-educated, successful, and usually well-adjusted people,<br />
but loneliness, relationship breakups, and career pressures have taken their toll. 196<br />
In addition, Gregg Easterbrook, in The Progress Paradox, reports that more<br />
than four times as many Americans describe themselves as lonely now than in 1957. 197<br />
Political scientist, Robert E. Lane, adds, “There is a kind of famine of warm interpersonal<br />
relations, of easy-to-reach neighbors, of encircling inclusive memberships, and of solid<br />
family life.” 198 Robert Putnam, author of Bowling Alone, documents the steep decline in<br />
all kinds of social connections. He observes: “Somehow in the last several decades of the<br />
twentieth century all these community groups and tens of thousands like them across<br />
America began to fade.” 199 He also notes that it is not as common <strong>for</strong> people to join clubs<br />
and organizations, invite friends over <strong>for</strong> a meal, or visit <strong>with</strong> their neighbors. Pintus adds<br />
these insights,<br />
Our Western culture offers a plethora of ‘solutions’ to feeling alone. We’re<br />
enticed to a whirl of activity that surrounds us <strong>with</strong> people. Technology is<br />
marketed as a way to build relationships and maintain instant connection.<br />
Websites provide <strong>new</strong> ways of finding a cyber pal. If those don’t meet your needs,<br />
internet pornography is only a few keystrokes away. Books, magazine articles,<br />
movies, and TV shows preach a false message that ‘as long as no one is hurt’<br />
sexual encounters provide the answer to loneliness. In most instances, society’s<br />
answers are not, and never will be, truly satisfying. We can also seek out older<br />
mentors and ask them how they handled times of loneliness. Talking to mature<br />
men or women who are further down the road in years and experience can lend<br />
perspective and help us see what might be ahead. 200<br />
Though our culture offers many alternative ways to fill the void that many feel<br />
in their lives, the potential satisfaction these alternatives may provide <strong>for</strong> a while will not<br />
196 Ibid, 107-108.<br />
197 Gregg Easterbrook, The Progress Paradox (New York: Random House, 2003), 180.<br />
198 Robert E. Lane, The Loss of Happiness in Market Democracies (New Haven, CT: Yale<br />
University Press, 2001), 9.<br />
199 Robert Putnam, Bowling Alone (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000), 16.<br />
200 Pintus, Discipleship Journal, 38, 41.
72 <br />
last and can lead to greater problems. There<strong>for</strong>e, in most cases the symptoms of<br />
loneliness and depression will return. Technology, <strong>with</strong> all the positives it brings, still has<br />
a dark side. Researcher Jean Twenge describes it this way: “It’s almost as if we are<br />
starving <strong>for</strong> affection. To take the analogy a little further, we’re malnourished from eating<br />
a junk-food diet of instant messages, e-mail, and phone calls, rather than the healthy food<br />
of live, in-person interaction.” 201<br />
Dr. James Dobson addresses the needs of women in his book Straight Talk to<br />
Men and Their Wives. Commenting on the increase in loneliness among women, Dobson<br />
contends that the breakdown today is not between men and women, but between women<br />
and women:<br />
A century ago, women cooked together, canned together, washed at the creek<br />
together, prayed together, went through menopause together, and grew old<br />
together. And when a baby was born, aunts and grandmothers and neighbors were<br />
there to show the <strong>new</strong> mother how to diaper and feed and discipline. Great<br />
emotional support was provided in this feminine contact. A woman was never<br />
really alone. Alas, the situation is very different today. The extended family has<br />
disappeared, depriving the wife of that source of security and fellowship. Her<br />
mother lives in New Jersey and her sister is in Texas. Furthermore, American<br />
families move every three or four years, preventing any long term friendships<br />
from developing among neighbors. 202<br />
In her book Generation Me, Dr. Jean M. Twenge, states: “The current<br />
generation of young people, born in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s is referred to as<br />
“Generation Me,” or, “GenMe,” 203 as she calls them. This group ranges in age from<br />
elementary school to thirty-something adults. The first Millennials were born in the year<br />
1982 and are now in graduate schools and the numbers will continue to rise <strong>with</strong> the<br />
largest influx being around the year 2013. With these expectations, the personal service,<br />
201 Twenge, Generation Me, 110.<br />
1984), 109.<br />
202 James C. Dobson, Straight Talk to Men and Their Wives (Waco, TX: Word Publishing,<br />
203 Twenge, Generation Me,5.
73 <br />
programs, and ministries to meet the needs of these young adults have to be planned and<br />
developed now.<br />
Dr. Twenge’s research reveals that this younger generation is tolerant,<br />
confident, open-minded, and ambitious but also cynical, depressed, lonely, and anxious.<br />
Dr. Twenge indicates that “Gen Me trusts no one, suggesting a culture growing ever more<br />
toward disconnection and away from close communities. Trusting no one and relying on<br />
yourself is a self-fulfilling prophecy in an individualistic world where the prevailing<br />
sentiment is ‘Do unto others be<strong>for</strong>e they do it to you.’” 204 GenMe has a value system in<br />
place that tells them the individual is the most important thing in life, and that the<br />
individual comes first. According to Dr. Twenge, it is easy to see why political scientist<br />
Robert Lane argues, “There is a kind of famine of warm interpersonal relationships, of<br />
easy to reach neighbors, of encircling inclusive memberships, and of solid family life. …<br />
Generation ME often lacks other basic human requirements: stable close relationship, a<br />
sense of community, a feeling of safety, a simple path to adulthood and the<br />
workplace.” 205 Many in this younger generation experience feelings of loneliness as a<br />
result of the culture in which they have grown up.<br />
Other researchers call this same generation that Twenge calls “Gen Me,” the<br />
“Millennial Generation.” Howe and Strauss refer to research done <strong>with</strong> The Chartwell<br />
2006 College Student Survey by saying:<br />
The Chartwells 2006 College Student Survey, released by LifeCourse<br />
Associates and Crux research, explores the <strong>new</strong> generational traits of the<br />
Millennial collegians – what differentiates them from other generations at the<br />
same age, what they want in a college, and how they feel about the cost of college<br />
and student debt. The study results highlight the upcoming changes that higher<br />
education will face as Millennials <strong>with</strong> Gen-X rather than Boomer parents fill<br />
America’s campuses in the years ahead… Millennials <strong>with</strong> Gen-X parents feel a<br />
greater desire to achieve, and more intense pressure in the college application<br />
204 Twenge, Generation Me, 36.<br />
205 Ibid, 110, 136.
74 <br />
process….Millennial collegians are pressured, career-oriented, concerned about<br />
the rising cost of college, and close <strong>with</strong> their protective parents. 206<br />
Howe and Strauss contend that, “Millennials as a group are unlike any other youths in<br />
living memory.” 207 These researchers highlight some of the positives of this younger<br />
generation beginning <strong>with</strong> the entering class of the fall of 2000 saying they are: “…more<br />
numerous, more affluent, better educated, and more ethnically diverse [than previous<br />
generations] and they are beginning to manifest a wide array of positive social<br />
habits…including a <strong>new</strong> focus on teamwork, achievement, modesty, and good<br />
conduct.” 208 Studies on this generation show that this generation has different needs,<br />
expectations, and pressures, than those that previous generations faced. Howe and Strauss<br />
observe, “The best-known fact about the Millennial Generation is that it is large. Already,<br />
America has well over ninety million Millennials … making it nearly a third bigger than<br />
the Boomers.” 209<br />
A study published by Nicole J. Borges et al, in ‘Comparing Millennial and<br />
Generation X Medical Students at One Medical School’ in Academic Medicine,<br />
discovered the following characteristics between three generational cohorts existent today<br />
as compared to the cohorts in 1989 to 1994:<br />
• Millennials scored higher in emotional stability, perfectionism, and rule<br />
orientation;<br />
• Gen Xers scored higher in risk taking, pragmatism, and self-reliance; and<br />
• Cuspers showed some of the traits of both generational neighbors. 210<br />
The implications <strong>for</strong> the academia are clearly stated by Howe & Strauss: “Older<br />
professors (Boomers especially) sometimes complain that many of today’s students are<br />
206 Howe and Strauss, Millennials Go to College, 75.<br />
207 Ibid., 13.<br />
208 Ibid., 14.<br />
209 Ibid., 35.<br />
210 Nicole J. Borges, et al., “Comparing Millennial and Generation X Medical Students at One<br />
Medical School” in Academic Medicine 81, no. 6 ( June 2006), 571-576.
75 <br />
so accustomed to quick turnaround assignments and a multitasking work style that big<br />
projects can overwhelm them….Millennials have developed great skill at turning rapidly<br />
from one problem to the next <strong>with</strong> more industry than reflection.…In all fields of<br />
graduate education, this generation will want structure, supervision, and feedback.” 211<br />
Realizing the needs and issues of these millennial students (as well as students<br />
of all ages) and developing the means to minister to and care <strong>for</strong> them grows increasingly<br />
important in academic institutions. DTS and other seminaries have the responsibility and<br />
opportunity to make a positive impact on students as the faculty and staff discovers <strong>new</strong><br />
ways in which students think and behave. Administrators and professors must find the<br />
means to meet the needs of all the different generations enrolled in seminary. It could<br />
prove to be a prime opportunity to change the dramatic statistics and trends of so many<br />
students experiencing loneliness.<br />
The tendency to feel lonely and isolated is magnified as the students<br />
experience dramatic change and challenges in their lives socially, geographically,<br />
culturally, spiritually and intellectually. In Bowling Alone, Robert Putnam documents the<br />
steep decline in all kinds of social connections. “We have been pulled apart from one<br />
another and from our communities over the last third of the [twentieth] century.” 212 It is<br />
Putnam’s further contention that we are less likely to belong to clubs and community<br />
organizations, less likely to have friends over <strong>for</strong> dinner, and less likely to visit our<br />
neighbors. And, he holds that our social contacts are slight compared to those enjoyed by<br />
earlier generations. 213 The Western culture seems to be in a change from earlier<br />
generations which valued neighbors and close friends in neighborhoods, inclusive social<br />
gatherings and closely connected family life. There<strong>for</strong>e, it makes it essential that<br />
211 Howe and Strauss, Millennials Go to College, 158, 204.<br />
212 Putnam, Bowling Alone, 24.<br />
213 Ibid., 96-100,108-109,115.
76 <br />
seminaries address these issues during the female students’ time of preparation <strong>for</strong><br />
ministry so that these women can go <strong>for</strong>th into ministry more secure in who they are and<br />
more equipped to minister to the needs of others.<br />
Depression<br />
Depression is generally defined in the dictionary as a mental/emotional<br />
disorder marked by sadness, inactivity, difficulty in thinking and concentration, a<br />
significant increase or decrease in appetite and time spent sleeping, feelings of dejection<br />
and hopelessness and sometimes suicidal tendencies. 214 “Depression is more than feeling<br />
low. It is a syndrome, a set of symptoms that indicates something more serious than<br />
ordinary low mood states. Evaluation includes two key considerations – how severe is the<br />
problem, and what is the cause?” 215 Many women face periods of depression and<br />
seminary students are not exempt from this common emotional issue.<br />
In today’s highly mobile and technological society, loneliness, depression,<br />
isolation, and individualism are on the rise. Isolation and loneliness set the climate <strong>for</strong><br />
anxiety and depression. At seminary, students move to a <strong>new</strong> environment, often a <strong>new</strong><br />
culture, <strong>with</strong>out friends or family near. Twenge observes, “It is often difficult <strong>for</strong> young<br />
people to make the transitions from the more certain world of college to the working<br />
world – or even graduate school – where ‘doing your best’ isn’t always enough, and<br />
choices aren’t always clear.” 216 Counselor Dr. Deborah Newman emphasizes the need<br />
<strong>for</strong> community. “The need <strong>for</strong> support is one of the major issues I emphasize when<br />
people come to counseling <strong>for</strong> depression and anxiety. Isolation can cause depression.<br />
1998), 311.<br />
214 Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary (Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, Inc.,<br />
215 William A. Miller and Kathleen A. Jackson, Practical Psychology <strong>for</strong> Pastors, 2 nd Edition<br />
(Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1995), 229.<br />
216 Twenge, Generation Me, 119.
77 <br />
Remember, God said, ‘It is not good <strong>for</strong> the man to be alone’ (Genesis 2:18). This is<br />
doubly true <strong>for</strong> women.” 217<br />
Christie Cozad Neuger notes that “depression is at an epidemic level among<br />
women, <strong>with</strong> the incidence steadily rising.” 218 Elizabeth Libert adds, “Women’s rising<br />
optimistic perceptions about the options available to them and about the very power to<br />
make choices concerning these options do not match the reality. Women’s rising<br />
expectations <strong>with</strong>out the means to fulfill them contribute to the frequency and severity of<br />
depression.” 219 More and more women enter seminary and face the challenges and<br />
priorities of being a scholar, a woman, wife, mother, remaining single, or being in fulltime<br />
careers and/or ministry. It becomes easier to see how more women will succumb to<br />
depression at seminary if they do not have their needs addressed and move into nurturing<br />
relationships. Dr. Newman states, “The need <strong>for</strong> support is one of the major issues I<br />
emphasize when people come to counseling <strong>for</strong> depression and anxiety. Isolation can<br />
cause depression. In fact, I think women grow, heal, and change in the context of<br />
supportive relationships.” 220 Woman-to-woman mentoring invites a woman out of<br />
isolation and allows her to share her frustrations, questions, experiences, expectations,<br />
and worries <strong>with</strong> another female who can relate to her life.<br />
Research indicates that depression is on the rise in our culture and this D.Min.<br />
study of women students reveals that depression is also an issue among <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary<br />
female students. Dr. Mike Lawson states in his book D is <strong>for</strong> Depression, that research<br />
217 Deborah Newman, Passion On Purpose, 165.<br />
218 Christie Cozad Neuger, “A Feminist Perspective on Pastoral Counseling <strong>with</strong> Women” in<br />
Clinical Handbook of Pastoral Counseling, Vol. 2, eds. Robert J. Wicks and Richard Parsons, (New York:<br />
Paulist Press, 1993), 201.<br />
219 Elizabeth Libert, “Coming Home to Themselves: Women’s Spiritual Care,” in Through the<br />
Eyes of Women: Insights <strong>for</strong> Pastoral Care, Jeanne Stevenson Moessner, ed., (Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg<br />
Fortress, 1996), 260.<br />
220 Deborah Newman, Passion on Purpose, 165.
78 <br />
shows that no person’s gender or age is exempt from being susceptible to depression.<br />
However, data has indicated that depression is “most common in the 25-44 year old age<br />
bracket, and although depression occurs as often in men as women, women are diagnosed<br />
and treated twice as often as men.” 221 Lawson goes on to say that “…depression rises in<br />
old age; 15 % of people over the age of sixty-five suffer depression; there is a link<br />
between depression in older people and those living alone; and teenage and young adult<br />
depression is also on the increase.” 222<br />
In addition, Twenge states that “…almost half of GenMe have seen their<br />
parents divorce, or have never known their father at all. This has a clear link to the rise of<br />
depression, as children of divorce are more likely to be anxious and depressed.” 223 The<br />
number of young adults and older adults alike who have experienced divorce in their<br />
families of origin or have been divorced themselves continues to rise. Isolation and<br />
loneliness readily lead to anxiety and depression. With a social system whose roots are<br />
not deep enough, this generation’s support systems remain too shallow and sets them up<br />
<strong>for</strong> alienation and the potential subsequent experiences of loneliness and then<br />
depression. 224<br />
Social psychologist and author, David Myers argues in his book The American<br />
Paradox that the United States has become a place where we have more but feel worse.<br />
Technology, affluence and material things may make life easier, but they do not make<br />
people happier. People long <strong>for</strong> the social connections of previous generations, but live in<br />
221 Michael Lawson, D Is <strong>for</strong> Depression (Ross-shire, Scotland: Christian Focus Publications,<br />
Geanies House, 2006), 127.<br />
222 Ibid., 127.<br />
223 Twenge, Generation Me, 111.<br />
224 Ibid., 115.
79 <br />
a confusing world of too many choices, and are becoming depressed at younger and<br />
younger ages. 225 Reporting on research done on depression, Twenge adds,<br />
Being young has not always carried such a high risk of being anxious,<br />
depressed, suicidal, or medicated. Only 1% to 2% of Americans born be<strong>for</strong>e 1915<br />
experienced a major depressive episode during their lifetimes, even though they<br />
lived through the Great Depression and two world wars. Today, the lifetime rate<br />
of major depression is ten times higher – between 15 % and 20 %. Some studies<br />
put the figure closer to 50 %. In one 1990s study, 21 % of teens aged 15 to 17 had<br />
already experienced major depression….These studies use a fairly strict<br />
definition, counting only depression severe enough to warrant medication or longterm<br />
therapy….Depression is oddly commonplace in today’s society. 226<br />
Depression is not going away and the numbers continue to rise at an alarming<br />
rate. “The number of people being treated <strong>for</strong> depression more than tripled in the ten-year<br />
period from 1987 to 1997, jumping from 1.8 million to 6.4 million. During 2002 alone,<br />
8.5 % of Americans took an antidepressant at some time, up from 5.6 % just five years<br />
be<strong>for</strong>e in 1997.” 227 It is also a paradox that today’s young people experience such high<br />
levels of stress and anxiety. With the exception of the tragic world changing event of<br />
9/11, the majority of today’s adults have lived <strong>for</strong> the greater part of their lives free from<br />
traumatic historical events such as world wars, financial market collapse, and national<br />
economic depression. Today, especially in our Western culture, we have better medical<br />
care, technology, more education, freedoms, choices, less physical labor in employment,<br />
and in general live rather prosperous lives. But researchers still report higher and higher<br />
levels of stress and anxiety which remain main contributors to depression.<br />
A 2002 Washington Post article entitled, “These Teens Are at the Top in<br />
Everything, Including Stress,” describes students who load their schedules <strong>with</strong> every<br />
Advanced Placement (AP) class available, have overloaded themselves <strong>with</strong><br />
225 David G. Myers, The American Paradox: Spiritual Hunger in an Age of Plenty (New<br />
Haven & London: Yale University Press, 2000). 135-139.<br />
226 Twenge, Generation Me, 105,106.<br />
227 Ibid., 106.
80 <br />
extracurricular activities and community service, all <strong>for</strong> the purpose of getting into the<br />
right college. 228 Then, when they do get into college, stress and anxiety only increases<br />
due to the competitiveness <strong>for</strong> grades, recommendations, internships, and job placements.<br />
And the stress, anxiety, and competition don’t stop during the college years. “Young<br />
college graduates who by-pass graduate school often find the job market difficult even<br />
during boom times, particularly if they majored in liberal arts.” 229 However, Howe and<br />
Strauss optimistically note, “Many Millennials in graduate and professional school will<br />
want to turn away from the competitive stress they have known <strong>for</strong> so long, turning<br />
instead toward a more balanced and community-oriented lifestyle.” 230 Women who seek<br />
and find nurturing mentoring relationships could perhaps prevent the tendency to become<br />
isolated, lonely, anxious and stressed, avoiding the pull into depression.<br />
Another significant issue women face today which can lead to depression is<br />
having an unhealthy self-esteem. In today’s world where the media constantly bombards<br />
the public <strong>with</strong> images of perfectly <strong>for</strong>med and maintained bodies, it has become an<br />
increasing problem <strong>for</strong> women to have a balanced and healthy self-esteem and selfimage.<br />
Many young women today experience the debilitating conditions of anorexia,<br />
bulimia, and unhealthy eating habits as they try to con<strong>for</strong>m to the physical expectations<br />
of a highly visual, sexual and competitive culture. Howe and Strauss report that “many<br />
Millennials skip meals or delve into harmful food fads or worse (anorexia, bulimia, or<br />
‘exercise bulimia’) once they are out of range of daily parental control.” 231 In her book<br />
228 Laura Sessions Stepp, “These Teens Are at the Top in Everything, Including Stress,”<br />
Washington Post, 5 May, 2002.<br />
229 Twenge, Generation Me, 118.<br />
230 Howe and Strauss, Millennials Go to College, 204.<br />
231 Ibid., 102.
81 <br />
Fasting Girls, which covers the topic of eating disorders, Joan Jacobs Blumberg lists the<br />
goals of young women as follows:<br />
…to be brainy and beautiful; to have an exciting $75,000-a-year job; to<br />
nurture two wonderful children in consort <strong>with</strong> a supportive but equally highpowered<br />
husband. To achieve such a perfect life, young women must be<br />
extremely demanding of themselves….The kind of personal control required to<br />
become the <strong>new</strong> Superwoman…parallels the single-mindedness that characterizes<br />
the anorexic.” 232<br />
Nanci Hellmich adds these statistics to explain that many women share a<br />
common dislike of their bodies:<br />
Women are notorious <strong>for</strong> hating their bodies. We are getting worse about this,<br />
too. ‘A 1995 study claims that women are even more dissatisfied <strong>with</strong> their bodies<br />
than they were 10 years earlier. In 1985, less than a third (30 percent) of women<br />
were dissatisfied <strong>with</strong> their appearance, while in 1995, nearly half (48 percent)<br />
were dissatisfied.’ And this was after 20 years of excessive media attention to<br />
diet, exercise, and general health. 233<br />
Dr. Deborah Newman, in her book Then God Created Woman, contends that<br />
“the complications of life and relationships can leave us bankrupt and lonely. As women,<br />
we must first recognize how much our relationships influence our view of ourselves and<br />
then find the sources of our negative images.” 234 Seminarian women often bring to the<br />
academic environment the unresolved issues in their lives that need to be addressed.<br />
Though there may be a smaller percentage of DTS women dealing <strong>with</strong> anorexia or<br />
bulimia, some female students struggle in the area of self-esteem and self-image which<br />
can contribute to bouts <strong>with</strong> depression.<br />
Conclusions from Research<br />
232 Joan Jacobs Blumberg, Fasting Girls (New York: New American Library, 1989), 267.<br />
September 1995, D1.<br />
233 Nanci Hellmich, “Looking Thin and Fit Weighs More on Women,” USA Today, 25<br />
234 Deborah Newman, Then God Created Woman, 53.
82 <br />
This literature review examined mentoring and two main issues of loneliness<br />
and depression which seminary women face. Little research has been done addressing the<br />
emotional needs and issues of female seminary students. More has been written on the<br />
topic of mentoring, although the majority of literature has been written by men or has<br />
been written by secular writers. There remains a great need <strong>for</strong> literature and training in<br />
the area of women mentoring women. The twenty-first century brings a <strong>new</strong> generation<br />
of young adults into the academic arena who have different expectations, experiences,<br />
relationships, and technological abilities. These younger generations are enrolling in<br />
<strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary and other seminaries and graduate schools in greater and greater<br />
numbers. Women enroll as students at <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary to prepare <strong>for</strong> Christian ministry.<br />
The seminary experience <strong>for</strong>mally trains and prepares them to serve Christ through<br />
serving others in the world. The preparation occurs not only in the classroom, but also as<br />
the students live out their beliefs in practice in the world. Women mentoring other<br />
women plays a crucial role in this process. As Carolyn Duff states, “Women as mentors<br />
provide coaching, in<strong>for</strong>mation, and opportunity. We also encourage a vision and support<br />
another woman’s growth and worth.” 235<br />
The fact that seven generations are alive in the twenty-first century<br />
significantly impacts this study because most of these seven generations participate in the<br />
life of <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary. The professors and the students span the ages of twenty-one to<br />
over ninety years old. Differences in needs and issues between generations will surface<br />
and the need to understand and relate to one another becomes essential so that all people<br />
can benefit from the experience of life and ministry together in the world.<br />
Women, generally, are relationship-oriented and desire networking, close<br />
friends, and wise counsel from others. In a broken and sin-filled world, people are<br />
wounded, emotionally broken, and in need of love, acceptance, and relationships which<br />
235 Duff, Learning From Other Women, 36.
83 <br />
will bring healing and healthy community into their lives. As women train in seminary<br />
<strong>for</strong> Christian vocations, the issues from their past also come <strong>with</strong> them. Many of those<br />
issues can be discovered and addressed through intentional mentoring relationships. At a<br />
time when women are open and learning more about theology, the Bible, their faith, and<br />
themselves, the ethos is prime to also meet their relational needs and address their<br />
personal issues through mentoring. By supporting and encouraging one another, female<br />
seminarians can then go out into the world and fulfill their calling into ministry and meet<br />
the demands and expectations of that calling in a stronger, healthier condition.
CHAPTER 3<br />
PROCEDURE AND RESEARCH METHOD<br />
This study intended to discover the personal needs and issues of the women<br />
students of <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary. The research focuses on identifying those needs<br />
and issues, analyzing the frequency <strong>with</strong> which the female students experience those<br />
particular needs and issues and then investigating the value of mentoring by an older<br />
woman or a peer mentor to help the women students deal <strong>with</strong> their personal needs and<br />
issues while attending <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary.<br />
Research Question and Hypotheses <br />
This study asked and answered the question, “What are the personal needs and<br />
issues of the <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary twenty-first century female students?” The<br />
following hypotheses were <strong>for</strong>med prior to the research process:<br />
1. Needs and issues will differ <strong>for</strong> <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary female<br />
students based on the demographic factors of younger and older students,<br />
single and married students, international and non-international students,<br />
and Th.M. and M.A. students.<br />
2. A survey of the <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary female students will reveal<br />
that their greatest personal issues will be in the area of depression,<br />
loneliness, stress, anxiety, and perfectionism.<br />
3. A survey of the <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary female students will reveal a<br />
struggle <strong>with</strong> the issues of self-image, self-acceptance, and self-confidence.<br />
4. A survey of the <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary female students will indicate a<br />
strong desire <strong>for</strong> mentoring relationships <strong>with</strong> older, more spiritually mature<br />
women.<br />
5. A survey of the <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary female student will reveal one<br />
of their greatest needs is <strong>for</strong> close meaningful relationships <strong>with</strong> men and<br />
women.<br />
84
85 <br />
Research Method<br />
A descriptive survey, designed to discover the personal needs and issues of<br />
the female seminarians served as the research instrument <strong>for</strong> this study. The instrument<br />
gathered both quantitative and qualitative responses by including both closed and open<br />
ended questions. The recipients received paper copies of the survey by mail rather than<br />
electronically through email in order to assure the female students of their total<br />
anonymity <strong>with</strong> answering the questions and give them the freedom to be honest and<br />
candid about their needs and issues <strong>with</strong>out fear of retribution.<br />
Population<br />
The target population <strong>for</strong> this study was comprised of all enrolled women<br />
students at <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary in the spring semester of 2008. This included all<br />
female students on the <strong>Dallas</strong> campus, at each of the five extension sites (Houston,<br />
Austin, San Antonio, Atlanta, Georgia, and Tampa, Florida), and all female online<br />
students. The DTS Office of the Registrar provided the original list of 600 names and<br />
mailing labels. The mailings went out through the U.S. Postal Service to those students<br />
who did not have a DTS mailbox on campus. Those female students who have DTS<br />
mailboxes received their copy of the survey through the DTS campus mail.<br />
Development of the Instrument<br />
An investigation of all doctoral dissertations over the past thirty years since<br />
women have been students at <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary did not reveal any surveys<br />
that focused on identifying the personal needs and issues of the female students. An<br />
original instrument needed to be developed in order to ascertain the desired in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
and input from the current female students.<br />
A descriptive survey, designed to discover the personal needs and issues of<br />
the <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary female students, served as the research instrument <strong>for</strong><br />
this study. The first draft became a pilot survey sent out to twelve female DTS students in
86 <br />
December 2007. These women represented different ages, degree plans, number of years<br />
at <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary, ethnicities, and marital status. A cover letter (Appendix A) was<br />
attached to the pilot survey. The letter asked the pilot group <strong>for</strong> their input on the amount<br />
of time it took to take the survey, evaluation of the effectiveness and thoroughness of the<br />
questions, and personal recommendations. The women agreed to fill out the survey and<br />
time how long it took to complete. They evaluated the survey and made suggested<br />
changes <strong>for</strong> clarity of questions, content, lay-out, length, and thoroughness of issues and<br />
personal needs. All ten of the women returned the pilot survey <strong>with</strong>in one week. The<br />
average time to complete the survey was ten minutes. The women identified any<br />
questions that were unclear, too personal to maintain anonymity, and any grammatical<br />
errors. Based on the feedback, a few questions were eliminated, a few were added, and a<br />
few were reworded <strong>for</strong> clarity. Their suggestions greatly helped in the construction of the<br />
final draft of the survey (Appendix B).<br />
The review of literature served as a primary source <strong>for</strong> the development of the<br />
instrument. From the literature review, a number of previous studies offered samples of<br />
surveys that were used to help design the instrument <strong>for</strong> structure, content, and the<br />
individual questions. Surveys used in doctoral work by the following people in<strong>for</strong>med the<br />
development of the instrument: Jeannette Entz Schubert and Joye B. Baker. 236 In<br />
addition, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches by<br />
John W. Creswell 237 , Survey Research Methods by Floyd J. Fowler, Jr. 238 , and<br />
236 See entries in the Bibliography <strong>for</strong> complete in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> each of these projects.<br />
237 John W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods<br />
Approaches 2 nd Ed. (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2003).<br />
238 Floyd J. Fowler, Jr. Survey Research Methods 3 rd Ed. (Applied Social Research Method<br />
Series, Vol. 1, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2002).
87 <br />
Educational Research: Competencies <strong>for</strong> Analysis and Applications by L. R. Gay and<br />
Peter Airasian 239 were consulted throughout the research process.<br />
The development of the instrument occurred as an independent study done<br />
under the guidance of Dr. Joye B. Baker, Adjunct Professor of Christian Education at<br />
DTS. Dr. Baker reviewed numerous drafts during September - December 2007 offering<br />
her experience and insights. Consultations <strong>with</strong> Dr. Jerry Wof<strong>for</strong>d, DTS Adjunct<br />
Professor in Doctor of Ministry, and Dr. Eugene Pond, Director of Institutional Research<br />
and Effectiveness at DTS provided expertise and guidance in the content and structure.<br />
Drs. Wof<strong>for</strong>d and Pond, along <strong>with</strong> Dr. Pond’s assistant, Mark Howell, also offered help<br />
in the analysis of the survey drawing from their years of experience working in research.<br />
The official survey was printed in December, 2007 (Appendix B). A cover<br />
letter (Appendix C), written by Lynn Etta Manning, survey designer and Advisor <strong>for</strong><br />
Women Students of <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary, was included <strong>with</strong> the survey,<br />
explaining the survey and giving directions regarding how to fill out and return the<br />
survey in a self-addressed, stamped envelope. The female students who had a <strong>Dallas</strong><br />
campus mail box were instructed to return the survey to a designated postal slot at the<br />
DTS Postal Center. The total cost of the survey was $504.29. This included printing,<br />
envelopes, and postage. Detailed accounting of expenses can be found in Appendix D.<br />
In January 2008, the official survey was mailed to 600 <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary<br />
female students. These included women students taking courses on the <strong>Dallas</strong> campus, at<br />
all five of the <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary extension sites, and all on-line women students. Two<br />
hundred and ninety-eight (298) surveys (49.6%) were received back from the women<br />
students by the March 2008 deadline. The survey was designed to collect demographic<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation, to assess current personal issues and needs of the female students, to<br />
239 L. R. Gay and Peter Airasian, Educational Research: Competencies <strong>for</strong> Analysis and<br />
Applications 7 th Ed. (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2003).
88 <br />
discover the relevant topics to use in programming events and speakers, and to gain any<br />
specific recommendations from the women students. This dissertation includes a<br />
summary of the data collected from the survey to help strengthen the training of women<br />
students at <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary. The results of this project were sent to Dr. Robert Garippa,<br />
Vice-President and Dean of Students, and Rose Henness, Chair of the Women Students’<br />
Fellowship Leadership Team.<br />
Description of the Instrument<br />
The survey (Appendix B) was printed front and back on three pages <strong>for</strong> a total<br />
of six pages in length. The survey contains seven demographic questions, sixty-five<br />
fixed-choice questions and three open-response questions. Each of the survey’s five<br />
sections has a title:<br />
A. Personal History and Demographics<br />
B. Personal Issues With Which You Currently Struggle<br />
C. Current Personal Needs While at DTS<br />
D. Topics <strong>for</strong> Programming, Seminars, and Speakers at DTS<br />
E. Concluding Comments<br />
The first section of the survey gathered demographic in<strong>for</strong>mation. The<br />
remaining sections sought responses to a number of different questions regarding<br />
personal issues and needs of the women students. The questions generated in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
related to each woman student’s own assessment of her personal needs and issues,<br />
interests, and perspective or experience <strong>with</strong> mentoring or being mentored. The final<br />
question asked <strong>for</strong> any needs or issues the student faced that were not covered on the<br />
survey.<br />
Each question was assigned a number or letter <strong>for</strong> identification. Section A of<br />
the survey included general questions related to current demographics. These included<br />
age of student by decade, marital status, and degree program enrolled in. In addition, the
89 <br />
respondents were asked whether they took classes at the <strong>Dallas</strong> campus, an extension site<br />
or online and the number of hours enrolled. Lastly, they were to indicate their<br />
participation in a Spiritual Formation group, and whether or not they were an American<br />
citizen.<br />
These broad demographic category questions were followed by twenty<br />
questions in Section B related to personal issues, personal needs and struggles, and<br />
relationships. Seven options could be circled on a seven-point scale from “Never” to<br />
“Always.” Six other questions of the thirty-two questions in Section B also had the option<br />
of a “N/A - not applicable” answer. In addition, there were six questions in Section B<br />
<strong>with</strong> the option of a “yes” or “no” answer.<br />
Section C dealt <strong>with</strong> the current personal needs of the women students while<br />
at DTS. Questions one through five, and question seven had an option of a “yes” or “no”<br />
response. Questions six and eight through sixteen were to be answered on the Likert scale<br />
from 1 to 7 <strong>with</strong> one being “never” and 7 being “always,” and there was a N/A option<br />
available on questions fourteen and fifteen. Question sixteen had a second part to the<br />
question where the student could write in any needs or issues they had that they felt were<br />
not included on the survey.<br />
Section D dealt <strong>with</strong> topics of interest or need <strong>for</strong> programming, seminars, or<br />
speakers. Question one in this section included seven sub-statements (a through g)<br />
pertaining to “non-academic needs.” The women indicated their response to these seven<br />
non-academic needs <strong>with</strong> five options of answering the question on a scale from 1-5, <strong>with</strong><br />
1 being “No Need” to 5 being “Greatest Need.” Question two in this section gave the<br />
student the opportunity to rate the desired subject need <strong>for</strong> speakers on nine different<br />
topics (“a” through “i”). Statement “j” was an option given to write in a personal need or<br />
suggestion not otherwise included in the previous list. These topics “a” through “j” were
90 <br />
to be rated according to a scale from 1 to 5 <strong>with</strong> 1 being “No Need” and 5 being<br />
“Greatest Need.”<br />
Section E offered the respondent the opportunity to write in any comments<br />
that the student might want to include that were not otherwise covered on the survey.<br />
Question one asked the question, “Are there any needs you have or struggles you face<br />
that were not covered on this survey?” The respondent was given the option of a “yes” or<br />
“no” answer. If the respondent answered “yes” to the first question in Section E, then the<br />
student was given the opportunity to anecdotally write any comment, suggestions, needs,<br />
or struggles that she might be encountering.<br />
The first hypothesis assumed that the needs and issues of the <strong>Dallas</strong><br />
Theological Seminary female students would differ based on the demographic factors of<br />
age, marital status, degree plan, and whether or not the student was an American citizen<br />
or an international student. It was validated by correlating the demographic in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
<strong>with</strong> the specific data assessed.<br />
The second hypothesis stated that the <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary female<br />
students’ greatest areas of struggles would be in the subject categories of depression,<br />
loneliness, stress, anxiety, and perfectionism. The third hypothesis speculated that the<br />
survey would reveal a common struggle <strong>with</strong> the various issues of self-image, selfesteem,<br />
and self-confidence. Results related to the second and third hypotheses were<br />
computed by correlating demographic in<strong>for</strong>mation in Section A <strong>with</strong> the list of personal<br />
issues in Section B.<br />
The fourth hypothesis speculated that the <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary female<br />
students would indicate a strong desire and need <strong>for</strong> mentoring relationships <strong>with</strong> older,<br />
more spiritually mature women. Section B and C in<strong>for</strong>med this hypothesis <strong>with</strong> the<br />
questions related to relationships, friendships, mentoring relationships, and the desire <strong>for</strong><br />
mentoring relationships.
91 <br />
The fifth hypothesis predicted that the DTS female students would indicate<br />
that “close meaningful relationships <strong>with</strong> men and women” is one of their greatest needs.<br />
This hypothesis was addressed through the in<strong>for</strong>mation gathered from questions in<br />
Section C and D of the survey.<br />
Procedures <strong>for</strong> Collecting the Data<br />
The DTS Office of the Registrar provided a master list of the women students’<br />
names and addresses along <strong>with</strong> a set of mailing labels. The labels were used <strong>for</strong> the<br />
mailing of the surveys. The women students who had DTS campus mailboxes received<br />
their survey through campus mail instead of going through the U. S. Postal Service. This<br />
first mailing had a cover letter <strong>with</strong> a personal salutation and explanation of the survey<br />
(Appendix C), the survey itself, and a stamped, self-addressed envelope to return the<br />
survey to Lynn Etta Manning, the Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students. The survey itself<br />
included an explanation of the confidentiality and anonymity of the respondents’<br />
answers. It also briefly explained the need and reason <strong>for</strong> such a survey of women<br />
students along <strong>with</strong> a brief statement of appreciation <strong>for</strong> the student’s responses.<br />
The instructions on the survey requested that the survey be returned to the<br />
Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students by February 15, 2008. Those students receiving the survey<br />
through the United States Postal Service were to return their survey in the self-addressed,<br />
stamped envelope. Those campus students <strong>with</strong> a DTS campus box were instructed to<br />
return their survey in the enclosed self-addressed envelope to the marked DTS mail slot<br />
labeled “DTS Women Students’ Survey.” The survey ended <strong>with</strong> a brief note of thanks<br />
and appreciation to the participant from the Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students.<br />
The survey was mailed to 600 women students. The campus post office<br />
returned thirty-three envelopes containing the survey which were undeliverable and/or<br />
did not have a <strong>for</strong>warding address.
92 <br />
One week be<strong>for</strong>e the date requested <strong>for</strong> the return of the completed surveys,<br />
an email was sent to all current women students to remind them to complete the survey<br />
and to return it (Appendix E). The final deadline was extended <strong>for</strong> receiving the<br />
completed surveys to March 1, 2008 to allow <strong>for</strong> a greater response. By the March date,<br />
298 surveys had been received which reflected an initial 49.6% return rate. Since thirtythree<br />
surveys were not deliverable, the valid surveys sent and received totaled 566<br />
surveys. Two of the surveys received from the respondents were determined to be<br />
unusable because the two students chose only to write critical comments rather than<br />
answer the questions. These were not counted in the final count of surveys received. A<br />
total of 296 valid, usable surveys (52.2%) were received and used <strong>for</strong> the data collected<br />
<strong>for</strong> this study. Upon receipt of each completed survey, a numerical assignment was<br />
assigned to the survey and filed until all were received by the March 1, 2008 final<br />
deadline.<br />
Procedures <strong>for</strong> Analyzing the Data<br />
Each completed survey as assigned an identification number upon receipt. The<br />
identification numbers ranged from 001 to 298. Each question on the survey was assigned<br />
a capital letter identifying its section of the survey and a number indicating the question.<br />
A coding was devised in order to assign quantitative answers to each of the seventy-two<br />
fixed-choice responses (Appendix F). The responses to all the questions were entered into<br />
an EXCEL spreadsheet. Dr. Gene Pond, Director of DTS Director of Institutional<br />
Research and Effectiveness and his assistant, Mr. Mark Howell, ran the data using the<br />
statistical program “SPSS 10.0” to compute the statistical data and generate tables and<br />
figures to report the results of the study.<br />
In addition, the researcher (Lynn Etta Manning) personally transcribed<br />
responses to the open-ended questions from the survey. The following include the three<br />
open-ended questions that were transcribed:
93 <br />
1. Question C16b asked the respondent to be as general or specific as she felt<br />
com<strong>for</strong>table explaining any needs/issues related to Question 16a. Question<br />
16a asked if there were family needs/issues that were disruptive to her<br />
academic work and the student was to rate those needs on a Likert scale<br />
from, 1 “never” to 7 “always.”<br />
2. Question D2 asked the respondent to indicate any speakers desired on<br />
specific topics listed a through i. Question D2j allowed <strong>for</strong> the respondent<br />
to write-in any additional topics on which they would like to have a<br />
speaker.<br />
3. Question E2 was a follow-up question to Question E1 which asked, “Are<br />
there any needs you have or struggles you face that were not covered on<br />
this survey?” If the answer was YES to Question E1, Question E2 stated,<br />
“If YES, what are those needs and/or struggles? Please list.” Space was<br />
provided <strong>for</strong> the respondent to write in her response.<br />
The responses to these open-ended questions generated 23 single-spaced pages of written<br />
responses. These comments offered anecdotal in<strong>for</strong>mation from the DTS women students<br />
that addressed the specific survey questions as well as additional comments that will be<br />
useful as <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary seeks to implement <strong>new</strong> programming and resources to<br />
minister to the personal needs and issues of the women students as they prepare <strong>for</strong><br />
ministry.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Although some of the questions on the survey did not directly relate to the<br />
hypotheses, the extra in<strong>for</strong>mation offered additional helpful insights to know more<br />
specifically what the women students themselves consider the personal needs and issues<br />
that impact their lives as they seek to pursue training <strong>for</strong> Christian ministry <strong>Dallas</strong><br />
Seminary. A major portion of literature reviewed <strong>for</strong> this DMin project investigated the<br />
need <strong>for</strong> women to mentor women and to have both peer mentors and older, more<br />
spiritually mature mentors as a part of the female seminarians’ preparation <strong>for</strong> ministry.<br />
All of the results of this survey will help to in<strong>for</strong>m the leadership of <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary as<br />
they seek to offer their women students the best possible preparation <strong>for</strong> a life of<br />
Christian ministry.
CHAPTER 4<br />
RESEARCH RESULTS<br />
The primary purpose of this study was to discover the personal needs and<br />
issues of the <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary female students and to surface ways that DTS<br />
and specifically, the Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students, can assist in addressing or ministering<br />
to the women students.<br />
Five hundred and seventy-seven women students of <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological<br />
Seminary received the survey (Appendix B) used in this D.Min. project. Of the ones<br />
completed and returned, 296 (52.2%) were used to compute the results. A coding was<br />
devised in order to assign quantitative values to each of the fixed-choice responses<br />
(Appendix F). Presentation of each portion of the results includes the number of the<br />
question from the survey that corresponds to the specific data. The research findings are<br />
organized under the following four headings:<br />
• Demographics<br />
• Personal Issues<br />
• Personal Needs<br />
• Topics <strong>for</strong> Programming<br />
The data gathered from the surveys were analyzed in correlation <strong>with</strong> the five<br />
hypotheses described previously in Chapter Three. The results are reported in this<br />
chapter.<br />
Please note: For all tables, the sum of the percentages may not equal the stated total due<br />
to rounding error.<br />
94
95 <br />
Current Description of Survey Respondents<br />
Questions 1-7 of Section A of the survey provide a description of the women<br />
students who responded to the survey according to demographics based on age, marital<br />
status, degree program, attendance on the <strong>Dallas</strong> campus vs. extension sites, student<br />
status, participation in Spiritual Formation, and American citizenship.<br />
Table 1. Age of Respondents<br />
Current Age of Respondents<br />
Frequency Percent Valid Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid<br />
20-29 140 47.3 47.3 47.3<br />
30-39 45 15.2 15.2 62.5<br />
40-49 51 17.2 17.2 79.7<br />
50-59 42 14.2 14.2 93.9<br />
60-69 16 5.4 5.4 99.3<br />
70 or above 2 .7 .7 100.0<br />
Total 296 100.0 100.0<br />
Age of Respondents<br />
The 296 women who returned a survey range in age from 20 to over 70 years<br />
of age (question A1). Note in Table 1 and Figure 1 that the majority of the respondents
96 <br />
are 20 to 29 years of age (47.3%). The remaining three age groups (30 to 39, 40 to 49,<br />
and 50 to 59 years of age) together represent almost 53% of the respondents.<br />
The first hypothesis of this study made the distinction of “younger” and<br />
“older” students. Due to the distribution of the ages of the respondents, any reference to<br />
“younger” used throughout this study will refer to women who are twenty to twenty-nine<br />
years old. References to “older” students will indicate a single cumulative group of<br />
women respondents who are thirty to seventy years of age.<br />
Marital Status of Respondents<br />
Table 2 and Table 3 indicate that of the 296 women students who returned the<br />
survey, 144 are single (49%) and 152 are married (51%). This even distribution between<br />
single and married female students helps to strengthen the results of the study when<br />
considering the personal needs and issues of the female students related to marital status<br />
Table 2. Current Marital Status<br />
Current Marital Status<br />
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent<br />
Valid<br />
Single 144 48.6 48.6 48.6<br />
Married 152 51.4 51.4 100.0<br />
Total 296 100.0 100.0<br />
Table 3 presents a cross-tabulation of current ages of the female students and<br />
current marital status. In the grouping of the younger students from 20 to 29,<br />
approximately 63% of the younger students are single. Female students ranging in age<br />
from 40 to 70 or above have a much lower percent of single status (36%).
97 <br />
Table 3. Current Age * Current Marital Status Cross-tabulation<br />
Current Age * Current Marital Status Cross-tabulation<br />
Current Marital Status<br />
Single Married Total<br />
Current Age<br />
20-29<br />
Count 88 52 140<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in Current Age 62.9% 37.1% 100.0%<br />
30-39<br />
Count 27 18 45<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in Current Age 60.0% 40.0% 100.0%<br />
40-49<br />
Count 10 41 51<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in Current Age 19.6% 80.4% 100.0%<br />
50-59<br />
Count 11 31 42<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in Current Age 26.2% 73.8% 100.0%<br />
60-69<br />
Count 6 10 16<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in Current Age 37.5% 62.5% 100.0%<br />
70 or<br />
above<br />
Count 2 0 2<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in Current Age 100.0% .0% 100.0%<br />
Total<br />
Count 144 152 296<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in Current Age 48.6% 51.4% 100.0%<br />
Degree Program of Respondents<br />
Eight Masters degree programs are offered at DTS. However, the respondents<br />
were only asked to indicate if they were enrolled in the Master of Theology (Th.M.), one<br />
of the Master of Arts (M.A.) degrees, or the Certificate of Graduate Studies (CGS). The
98 <br />
survey revealed that 213 women (72 %) are enrolled in one of the M.A. programs and 43<br />
women (approximately 15%) are pursuing their Th.M. (See Table 4). Fifteen of the<br />
respondents (5%) are in the CGS program. The remaining 25 women (8%) indicated by<br />
“Other” represent nine women in Ph.D. or D.Min. programs and sixteen women who<br />
classify themselves as non-degree.<br />
Table 4. DTS Degree<br />
DTS Degree<br />
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent<br />
Valid<br />
ThM 43 14.5 14.5 14.5<br />
MA 213 72.0 72.0 86.5<br />
CGS 15 5.1 5.1 91.6<br />
Other 25 8.4 8.4 100.0<br />
Total 296 100.0 100.0<br />
When looking at the cross-tabulation of the ages of students <strong>with</strong> their specific<br />
degree pursuit (Table5), the survey revealed an almost equal distribution of younger and<br />
older students in the Th.M. and M.A. programs. There are 21 younger Th.M. students and<br />
22 older women in the Th.M. program. One-hundred and twelve younger women<br />
students and 101 older women students are in the M.A. program. There are twice as many<br />
older women students (10) in the CGS program than there are younger students (5).
99 <br />
Table 5. Current Age * DTS Degree Cross-tabulation<br />
Current<br />
Age<br />
20-29<br />
30-39<br />
40-49<br />
50-59<br />
60-69<br />
Current Age* DTS Degree Cross-Tabulation<br />
DTS Degree<br />
ThM MA CGS Other Total<br />
Count 21 112 5 2 140<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in Current<br />
Age<br />
15.0% 80.0% 3.6% 1.4% 100.0%<br />
Count 6 36 2 1 45<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in Current<br />
Age<br />
13.3% 80.0% 4.4% 2.2% 100.0%<br />
Count 11 27 3 10 51<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in Current<br />
Age<br />
21.6% 52.9% 5.9% 19.6% 100.0%<br />
Count 4 31 3 4 42<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in Current<br />
Age<br />
9.5% 73.8% 7.1% 9.5% 100.0%<br />
Count 1 7 2 6 16<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in Current<br />
Age<br />
6.2% 43.8% 12.5% 37.5% 100.0%<br />
70 or Count 0 0 0 2 2<br />
above % <strong>with</strong>in Current<br />
.0% .0% .0% 100.0% 100.0%<br />
Age<br />
Total<br />
Count 43 213 15 25 296<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in Current<br />
Age<br />
14.5% 72.0% 5.1% 8.4% 100.0%<br />
Campus Location<br />
A total of 207 respondents (70%) indicated they attend classes on the DTS<br />
main campus in <strong>Dallas</strong>, Texas, as shown in Table 6. The remaining 89 (30%) respondents<br />
take classes either on DTS extension campuses or online.
100 <br />
Table 6. <strong>Dallas</strong> Campus Attendance<br />
Currently taking classes on the <strong>Dallas</strong> campus<br />
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent<br />
Valid<br />
Yes 207 69.9 69.9 69.9<br />
No 89 30.1 30.1 100.0<br />
Total 296 100.0 100.0<br />
Student Status<br />
To be classified as full time status, a student has to be enrolled in twelve or<br />
more hours. The survey indicated that 105 (35%) of the respondents are full time students<br />
<strong>with</strong> the majority of respondents (184) classified as part time students (65%). Table 7<br />
shows the distribution of the survey respondents based on their full or part-time status.<br />
Table 7. Current Student Status<br />
Current student status<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid<br />
Full time (12+ hrs) 105 35.5 36.3 36.3<br />
Part time (< 12 hrs) 184 62.2 63.7 100.0<br />
Total 289 97.6 100.0<br />
Missing 7 2.4<br />
Total 296 100.0
101 <br />
Cross-tabulation of Current Age and Current Student Status<br />
A cross-tabulation of the survey statistics (Table 8) indicates that the majority<br />
of the female students completing the survey in the younger category are almost equally<br />
distributed between full time status and part time status <strong>with</strong> seventy-three (54%)<br />
carrying twelve hours or more and sixty-three (46%) carrying less than twelve hours. In<br />
the older student group, the part-time students have a higher number <strong>with</strong> 121 (79%)<br />
taking twelve hours or less and only 32 (21%) of the older respondents have full-time<br />
status.<br />
Table 8. Current Age* Current Student Status Cross-tabulation<br />
Current Age * Current student status Cross-tabulation<br />
Current student status<br />
Full time (12+<br />
hrs)<br />
Part time (< 12<br />
hrs)<br />
Total<br />
Current Age<br />
20-29<br />
30-39<br />
40-49<br />
50-59<br />
60-69<br />
70 or<br />
above<br />
Total<br />
Count 73 63 136<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in Current Age 53.7% 46.3% 100.0%<br />
Count 11 32 43<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in Current Age 25.6% 74.4% 100.0%<br />
Count 9 42 51<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in Current Age 17.6% 82.4% 100.0%<br />
Count 9 32 41<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in Current Age 22.0% 78.0% 100.0%<br />
Count 2 14 16<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in Current Age 12.5% 87.5% 100.0%<br />
Count 1 1 2<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in Current Age 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%<br />
Count 105 184 289<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in Current Age 36.3% 63.7% 100.0%
102 <br />
Participation in Spiritual Formation Groups<br />
Most of the degree programs at DTS require participation in a Spiritual<br />
Formation (SF) group. The only programs of study exempt from this requirement are the<br />
Masters of Biblical Studies (MABS) and the Masters of Biblical Counseling (MABC).<br />
According to Table 9, approximately 54% of the respondents indicated that they either<br />
have been in a Spiritual Formation group or are currently participating in one.<br />
Table 9. Spiritual Formation Group Participation<br />
Valid<br />
In or have been in a Spiritual Formation Group<br />
Frequency Percent Valid Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Yes 161 54.4 54.4 54.4<br />
No 135 45.6 45.6 100.0<br />
Total 296 100.0 100.0<br />
As indicated in Table 10, when the statistics are broken down into the specific<br />
degree program, of the <strong>for</strong>ty-three women in the Th.M. program, thirty-eight students<br />
(88%) are in or have been in a Spiritual Formation group. Only 12% of the Th.M.<br />
students have not or are not in a Spiritual Formation group. Three (20%) are from the<br />
CGS program, and eight (32%) of the Ph.D., D.Min., or Non-degree students indicated<br />
they are or have been in a Spiritual Formation group. Approximately 47% of the students<br />
in the M.A. program are not or have not participated in a Spiritual Formation group. It<br />
can be assumed that many of the women in the last group are in the MABS or MABC<br />
programs since they are not required to join an SF group.
103 <br />
Table 10. DTS Degree* In or Have Been In a Spiritual Formation Group<br />
DTS Degree * In or have been in a Spiritual Formation Group Cross-tabulation<br />
In or have been in a Spiritual Formation<br />
Group<br />
Yes No Total<br />
DTS ThM Count 38 5 43<br />
Degree % <strong>with</strong>in DTS Degree 88.4% 11.6% 100.0%<br />
MA Count 112 101 213<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in DTS Degree 52.6% 47.4% 100.0%<br />
CGS Count 3 12 15<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in DTS Degree 20.0% 80.0% 100.0%<br />
Other Count 8 17 25<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in DTS Degree 32.0% 68.0% 100.0%<br />
Total Count 161 135 296<br />
% <strong>with</strong>in DTS Degree 54.4% 45.6% 100.0%<br />
American Citizenship Versus International Student Population<br />
One last question on demographics (A7) sought to discover the breakdown of<br />
students by citizenship. Table 11 shows that 281 respondents (95%) are American<br />
citizens and fifteen International female students (5%) responded to the survey. The DTS<br />
enrollment records indicate that there were twenty-seven female international students<br />
attending DTS at the time the survey was distributed.<br />
Table 11. American Citizenship<br />
American citizen<br />
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent<br />
Valid<br />
Yes 281 94.9 94.9 94.9<br />
No 15 5.1 5.1 100.0<br />
Total 296 100.0 100.0
104 <br />
Issues of Personal Struggle<br />
The second section of the survey (questions B1 – B32) asked the women<br />
students to indicate the degree to which they struggle <strong>with</strong> various personal issues.<br />
Questions B1 – B27 used a seven-point Likert scale of “Never” to “Always.” The issues<br />
presented in B1 – B27 included: depression, loneliness, poor self-image, lack of<br />
confidence, perfectionism, stress, anxiety/fear, panic attacks, comparison <strong>with</strong> other<br />
women, balancing time, contentment or discontentment <strong>with</strong> marital status,<br />
communication <strong>with</strong> male students, fidelity in marriage, alcohol usage, homosexual<br />
desires, masturbation, pornography, and struggle <strong>with</strong> doubts in faith and beliefs.<br />
Questions B28 – B32 offered “Yes” or “No” answers. The issues these five questions<br />
covered were: having meaningful friendships and relationships, sexual activity if single,<br />
sexual abuse, verbal/emotional abuse, and physical abuse.<br />
The following Tables present the results from the 296 DTS women students<br />
who returned the completed survey. These results represent 52% of the 566 women<br />
students enrolled at DTS in the spring semester, 2008. The first section presents results<br />
related to Hypothesis Two. The second section includes results related to Hypothesis<br />
Three. The final section reports data from additional questions on the survey regarding<br />
other personal issues faced by the women students.<br />
The second hypothesis of the project stated, “A survey of the <strong>Dallas</strong><br />
Theological Seminary female students will reveal that their greatest personal issues will<br />
be in the area of depression, loneliness, stress, anxiety, and perfectionism.” The following<br />
results reveal that these issues listed in the Hypothesis Two are in fact some of the most<br />
frequent struggles faced by the women students attending DTS.
105 <br />
Issues Related to Hypothesis Two<br />
Depression<br />
Question B1 on the survey revealed that 104 (35%) of the respondents<br />
reported some degree of a struggle <strong>with</strong> depression from “somewhat” to “always” an<br />
issue. Only 9% of the women indicated a significant problem <strong>with</strong> depression (checking<br />
the “often to always” categories). The remaining 192 respondents (65%) reported that<br />
they never or rarely struggle <strong>with</strong> depression as a personal issue. The results reveal that<br />
although one third of the women students experience some level of depression, only one<br />
tenth (26 women) indicate a serious struggle <strong>with</strong> depression. Even so, in Table 12 the<br />
data does support the need to help women students deal <strong>with</strong> the issue of depression.<br />
Table 12. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Depression<br />
Valid<br />
Struggle <strong>with</strong> depression<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Never 50 6.9 6.9 16.9<br />
Rarely 142 8.0 8.0 64.9<br />
Somewhat 52 7.6 7.6 82.4<br />
Moderately 26 .8 .8 91.2<br />
Often 19 6.4 6.4 97.6<br />
Usually 4 1.4 1.4 99.0<br />
Always 3 1.0 1.0 100.0<br />
Total 296 100.0 100.0<br />
Loneliness<br />
Table 13 indicates that over half of the women students on occasion struggle<br />
<strong>with</strong> loneliness (Question B4). The survey revealed 162 women students (55%)<br />
responded <strong>with</strong> “somewhat” to “always,” while 134 students (45%) responded <strong>with</strong>
106 <br />
“never” or “rarely” regarding their having a struggle <strong>with</strong> loneliness. Of the respondents,<br />
17% stated they “often” to “always” face loneliness.<br />
Table 13. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Loneliness<br />
Struggle <strong>with</strong> loneliness<br />
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent<br />
Valid<br />
Never 32 10.8 10.8 10.8<br />
Rarely 102 34.5 34.5 45.3<br />
Somewhat 77 26.0 26.0 71.3<br />
Moderately 36 12.2 12.2 83.4<br />
Often 34 11.5 11.5 4.9<br />
Usually 12 4.1 4.1 99.0<br />
Always 3 1.0 1.0 100.0<br />
Total 296 100.0 100.0<br />
Difficulty Handling Stress<br />
Two hundred and two women students (68%) indicated at least “somewhat” to<br />
“always” having difficulty <strong>with</strong> handling stress, although only 15% felt it was a problem<br />
on a regular basis. Ninety-four women (32%) reported “never” or “rarely” having<br />
difficulty <strong>with</strong> handling stress. Dealing <strong>with</strong> stress is one of the significant struggles <strong>for</strong><br />
the seminary women (see Table 14).<br />
Table 14. Difficulty handling stress <br />
Valid<br />
Difficulty handling stress<br />
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent<br />
Never 8 .7 2.7 2.7<br />
Rarely 86 9.1 29.1 31.8<br />
Somewhat 112 7.8 37.8 69.6<br />
Moderately 45 5.2 15.2 84.8<br />
Often 22 .4 7.4 92.2<br />
Usually 17 .7 5.7 98.0<br />
Always 6 .0 2.0 100.0<br />
Total 296 100.0 100.0
107 <br />
Anxiety/Fear<br />
Related to issues of anxiety and fear (Question B20), over half of the women<br />
students (56%) reported a struggle in this area (Table 15), <strong>with</strong> 14% of the respondents<br />
indicating “often” to “usually.” The survey showed that 44% of the women “rarely” or<br />
“never” face problems of anxiety and fear.<br />
Table 15. Difficulty Handling Anxiety/Fear<br />
Valid<br />
Difficulty Handling Anxiety/Fear<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Never 23 7.8 7.8 7.8<br />
Rarely 108 36.5 36.6 44.4<br />
Somewhat 70 23.6 23.7 68.1<br />
Moderately 53 17.9 18.0 86.1<br />
Often 25 8.4 8.5 94.6<br />
Usually 12 4.1 4.1 98.6<br />
Always 4 1.4 1.4 100.0<br />
Total 295 99.7 100.0<br />
Missing 1 .3<br />
Total 296 100.0<br />
Panic Attacks<br />
Research has shown that sometimes high levels of stress can lead to panic<br />
attacks and other stress induced illnesses (Question B21). The data in Table 16 indicates<br />
that 255 students (89%) responded <strong>with</strong> “never” or “rarely” having panic attacks. Only<br />
11% of the respondents (31 women) showed some level of experience <strong>with</strong> panic attacks<br />
<strong>with</strong> just six women (3%) facing an often or usually significant problem (see Table 16).
108 <br />
Table 16. Experience Panic Attacks<br />
Valid<br />
Have panic attacks<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Never 188 63.5 63.5 63.5<br />
Rarely 77 26.0 26.0 89.5<br />
Somewhat 21 7.1 7.1 96.6<br />
Moderately 4 1.4 1.4 98.0<br />
Often 4 1.4 1.4 99.3<br />
Usually 2 .7 .7 100.0<br />
Total 296 100.0 100.0<br />
Perfectionism<br />
Women struggling <strong>with</strong> perfectionism as a personal issue (Question B3)<br />
totaled 246 (78%), while only <strong>for</strong>ty-nine respondents (22%) reported “never” or “rarely”<br />
having a struggle <strong>with</strong> perfectionism. Table 17 shows the three largest categories of<br />
struggle were “somewhat,” <strong>with</strong> seventy-five respondents (25%), and sixty-two<br />
respondents (21%) reported an “often” rating, and fifty students (17%) indicated<br />
“usually” as the severity of their struggle <strong>with</strong> perfectionism. Fifteen women (5%)<br />
indicated “never” struggling <strong>with</strong> perfectionism while the same number of women (5%)<br />
reported “always” struggling <strong>with</strong> perfectionism. The survey revealed that the issue of<br />
perfectionism is the greatest struggle facing the women students at DTS.
109 <br />
Table 17. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Perfectionism<br />
Struggle <strong>with</strong> perfectionism<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Never 15 5.1 5.1 5.1<br />
Rarely 34 11.5 11.5 16.6<br />
Somewhat 75 25.3 25.4 2.0<br />
Moderately 44 14.9 14.9 56.9<br />
Often 62 20.9 21.0 78.0<br />
Usually 50 16.9 16.9 94.9<br />
Always 15 5.1 5.1 100.0<br />
Total 295 99.7 100.0<br />
Missing 1 .3<br />
Total 296 100.0<br />
Issues Related to Hypothesis Three<br />
The third hypothesis of this study states, “A survey of the <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological<br />
Seminary female students will reveal a struggle <strong>with</strong> the issues of self-image, self<br />
acceptance, and self-confidence.” The survey revealed that a significant number of<br />
women struggle in these areas.<br />
Unhealthy Personal Body Image<br />
The women were asked if they had a struggle <strong>with</strong> an unhealthy personal body<br />
image in Question B5, meaning they have a critical attitude towards their physical body.<br />
Those respondents indicating some level of struggle <strong>with</strong> body image totaled 164 (44%),<br />
<strong>with</strong> those indicating “never” or “rarely” having a struggle totaled 131 (56%). Only 3%<br />
of the women indicated a serious issue related to body image. This is a common problem<br />
<strong>for</strong> many women in today’s Western culture but Table 18 shows that issues related to an<br />
unhealthy perspective of their physical body are a marginal problem <strong>for</strong> most DTS<br />
women.
110 <br />
Table 18. Struggle <strong>with</strong> an Unhealthy Personal Body Image<br />
Struggle <strong>with</strong> an unhealthy personal body image<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Never 33 11.1 11.2 11.2<br />
Rarely 8 33.1 33.2 44.4<br />
Somewhat 71 24.0 24.1 68.5<br />
Moderately 40 13.5 13.6 82.0<br />
Often 31 10.5 10.5 92.5<br />
Usually 14 4.7 4.7 97.3<br />
Always 8 2.7 .7 100.0<br />
Total 295 99.7 100.0<br />
Missing 1 .3<br />
Total 96 100.0<br />
Bulimia and Anorexia<br />
Related to body image issues are the growing problems in our culture of<br />
bulimia and anorexia (Question B6). When the women students were asked about these<br />
behaviors, only thirteen respondents (4%) indicated they have some level of struggle <strong>with</strong><br />
an eating disorder. Most of the women (89%) indicated that they have never had an<br />
eating disorder and 7% indicated that it was “rarely” a problem (see Table 19).
111 <br />
Table 19. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Either Bulimia or Anorexia<br />
Struggle <strong>with</strong> either bulimia or anorexia<br />
Frequency Percent Valid Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Never 262 88.5 88.8 88.8<br />
Rarely 20 6.8 6.8 95.6<br />
Somewhat 4 1.4 1.4 96.9<br />
Moderately 3 1.0 1.0 98.0<br />
Often 4 1.4 1.4 99.3<br />
Usually 1 3 .3 99.7<br />
Always 1 .3 .3 100.0<br />
Total 295 9.7 100.0<br />
Missing 1 .3<br />
Total 296 100.0<br />
Low Self-esteem<br />
In addressing the issue of “self-esteem,” 153 (52%) women students reported<br />
some degree of struggle <strong>with</strong> low self-esteem <strong>with</strong> only 12% indicating a significant<br />
problem in this area. These figures (Table 20) show the remaining 143 women students<br />
(48%) reported either “never” or “rarely” having a struggle <strong>with</strong> self-esteem as a personal<br />
issue.<br />
Table 20. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Low Self-Esteem<br />
Valid<br />
Struggle <strong>with</strong> low self-esteem<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Never 28 9.5 9.5 9.5<br />
Rarely 115 8.9 38.9 48.3<br />
Somewhat 72 24.3 24.3 72.6<br />
Moderately 44 14.9 14.9 87.5<br />
Often 30 10.1 10.1 97.6<br />
Usually 5 1.7 1.7 99.3<br />
Always 2 .7 .7 100.0<br />
Total 296 100.0 100.0
112 <br />
Low Self-confidence<br />
The data revealed that half of the women respondents (49%) “rarely” or<br />
“never” struggle <strong>with</strong> low self-confidence (Question B12), <strong>with</strong> 51% indicating they<br />
“somewhat” to “always” deal <strong>with</strong> low self-confidence. These results show that the<br />
highest response was 125 students (42%) stating that they “rarely” have a struggle instead<br />
of “never” having a struggle <strong>with</strong> low self-confidence, suggesting the possibility that<br />
almost half of the women at DTS may face low self-confidence occasionally, but only<br />
13% of the women students indicated that issues of low self-confidence are a significant<br />
problem in their lives. Table 21 reflects the distribution of responses.<br />
Table 21. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Low Self-Confidence <br />
Struggle <strong>with</strong> low self-confidence<br />
Frequency Percent<br />
Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Never 20 6.8 6.8 6.8<br />
Rarely 125 42.2 42.4 49.2<br />
Somewhat 83 28.0 28.1 77.3<br />
Moderately 44 14.9 14.9 92.2<br />
Often 18 6.1 6.1 98.3<br />
Usually 2 .7 .7 99.0<br />
Always 3 1.0 1.0 100.0<br />
Total 295 99.7 100.0<br />
Missing 1 .3<br />
Total 296 100.0
113 <br />
Other Issues of the DTS Female Students<br />
Alcohol Use<br />
DTS has a “no alcohol” policy <strong>for</strong> all of its students, faculty and staff. In<br />
response to Question B7 on the survey, the women students reported that 57% adhere to<br />
the total abstinence policy while 43% of the respondents indicated that they do not totally<br />
comply <strong>with</strong> the policy. Only two respondents did not have a response to this question.<br />
Table 22 reveals that of women who do not comply <strong>with</strong> the alcohol policy, 29% of them<br />
“rarely” drink alcohol <strong>with</strong> 8% indicating “somewhat” and only 5% state that they drink<br />
alcohol more regularly.<br />
Table 22. Drink Alcoholic Beverage While Attending DTS<br />
Drink alcoholic beverages while attending DTS<br />
Frequency Percent Valid Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Never 169 57.1 57.5 57.5<br />
Rarely 85 28.7 28.9 86.4<br />
Somewhat 25 8.4 8.5 94.9<br />
Moderately 9 .0 3.1 98.0<br />
Often 4 1.4 1.4 99.3<br />
Usually 2 .7 .7 100.0<br />
Total 294 99.3 100.0<br />
Missing 2 7<br />
Total 296 100.0<br />
Balancing Marriage, Family, and Studies<br />
Question B8 asked the married women students about their challenges of<br />
balancing marriage, their family, and their studies at DTS. Of the 155 married female<br />
students who returned a survey, 124 (80%) struggle <strong>with</strong> some level of balance between<br />
marriage, family and the requirements of DTS.
114 <br />
Only thirty-one married women (20%) indicated they “never” or “rarely” struggled <strong>with</strong><br />
this issue, but 46% state they “often” to “always” find it a significant challenge. Table 23<br />
also shows that 141 responses were “missing” which represents the single female<br />
students who completed the survey who did not answer this question. However, there<br />
were three respondents who did not respond to the question at all since the total number<br />
of single female students who returned the survey totaled 144.<br />
Table 23. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Balancing Marriage, Family, and Requirements of DTS as a<br />
Married Student<br />
As a married student, struggle <strong>with</strong> balancing marriage, family, and<br />
requirements of DTS<br />
Frequency Percent Valid Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Never 6 2.0 3.9 3.9<br />
Rarely 25 8.4 16.1 20.0<br />
Somewhat 33 11.1 21.3 41.3<br />
Moderately 20 6.8 12.9 54.2<br />
Often 34 11.5 21.9 76.1<br />
Usually 12 4.1 7.7 83.9<br />
Always 25 8.4 16.1 100.0<br />
Total 155 52.4 100.0<br />
Missing 141 47.6<br />
Total 296 100.0<br />
Balancing Singleness, Family, and Studies<br />
Of interest is the fact that a greater percent of single women (85%) than<br />
married women (80%) struggle <strong>with</strong> balancing personal life, family, and the requirements<br />
of DTS (Question B8). Table 24 shows that 119 of the 144 total single female<br />
respondents have some level of problem balancing these areas of their lives and 12%<br />
have a significant struggle in balancing the different areas of their lives. Only 15% of the<br />
single students feel they “rarely” or “never” have difficulty balancing personal, family, or
115 <br />
seminary related responsibilities. A total of 156 students did not respond to this inquiry.<br />
The total number of married female students returning the survey is 152. There<strong>for</strong>e, four<br />
of the women returning the survey did not respond to this question <strong>for</strong> another reason<br />
other than not being single.<br />
Table 24. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Balancing Personal Life, Family, and Requirements of DTS<br />
as a Single Student<br />
As a single student, struggle <strong>with</strong> balancing personal life, family, requirements of DTS<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Never 6 2.0 .3 4.3<br />
Rarely 15 .1 0.7 15.0<br />
Somewhat 31 10.5 22.1 37.1<br />
Moderately 29 .8 20.7 57.9<br />
Often 28 9.5 20.0 77.9<br />
Usually 13 .4 .3 87.1<br />
Always 18 .1 2.9 100.0<br />
Total 140 7.3 100.0<br />
Missing 156 52.7<br />
Total 296 100.0<br />
Marital Fidelity in Thought Life<br />
Table 25 indicates the responses from the 159 married female students<br />
regarding whether or not they have a struggle <strong>with</strong> being faithful to their husband in their<br />
thought life. The vast majority, 145 respondents (91%), responded <strong>with</strong> a “never” or<br />
“rarely” response. Only fourteen married women students (9%) responded <strong>with</strong> a<br />
“somewhat” to “always” answer, and of these women, only 1% (three women) expressed<br />
a regular problem in this area.
116 <br />
Table 25. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Faithfulness to Husband in Thought Life<br />
Struggle <strong>with</strong> being faithful to my husband in my thought life<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Never 78 26.4 49.1 49.1<br />
Rarely 67 22.6 2.1 91.2<br />
Somewhat 7 .4 .4 95.6<br />
Moderately 4 .4 .5 98.1<br />
Often 1 3 6 98.7<br />
Usually 2 7 .3 100.0<br />
Total 159 3.7 100.0<br />
Missing 137 6.3<br />
Total 296 100.0<br />
Marital Fidelity in Actions<br />
When the married students were asked whether or not they struggle <strong>with</strong> being<br />
faithful to their husband in their actions (Question B11), 85% indicated “never” and 14%<br />
reported “rarely.” Only one student reported having “somewhat” of a struggle <strong>with</strong> the<br />
issue in an active way. There are 141 missing responses representing the single students<br />
who did not answer this question (see Table 26).<br />
Table 26. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Faithfulness to Husband <strong>with</strong> Actions<br />
Struggle <strong>with</strong> being faithful to my husband <strong>with</strong> my actions<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Never 132 44.6 85.2 85.2<br />
Rarely 22 7.4 14.2 99.4<br />
Somewhat 1 3 6 100.0<br />
Total 155 2.4 100.0<br />
Missing 141 7.6<br />
Total 296 100.0
117 <br />
Discontentment in Singleness<br />
Table 27 presents the responses to Question B13 on the survey related to<br />
single women being discontent <strong>with</strong> their singleness. The single female students indicated<br />
that 58% of them have at least somewhat of a struggle <strong>with</strong> being single. Only 10% stated<br />
that they never have a problem being single and 32% feel they rarely struggle <strong>with</strong> their<br />
marital status. The data shows that over half of the single women students experience<br />
some level of discontentment in being single and 15% have a high degree of discontent<br />
<strong>with</strong> their marital status.<br />
Table 27. Discontentment in Singleness<br />
Discontent in my singleness<br />
Frequency Percent Valid Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Never 15 5.1 10.5 10.5<br />
Rarely 45 15.2 31.5 42.0<br />
Somewhat 41 13.9 28.7 70.6<br />
Moderately 20 6.8 14.0 84.6<br />
Often 12 4.1 8.4 93.0<br />
Usually 6 2.0 4.2 97.2<br />
Always 4 1.4 2.8 100.0<br />
Total 143 48.3 100.0<br />
Missing 153 51.7<br />
Total 296 100.0<br />
Discontentment in Marriage<br />
When looking at contentedness <strong>for</strong> the married women (Question B14), Table<br />
28 indicates that 87% of the married female students are “never or rarely” discontent in<br />
their marriage. Only 13% of the married female students express some level of discontent<br />
<strong>with</strong> their marriage and most of them (8%) only believe this to be somewhat of a<br />
problem.
118 <br />
Just four women (1%) state that they have a high level of discontent in their marriage.<br />
The results reveal that the vast majority of married women students are content in their<br />
marriages.<br />
Table 28. Discontentment in Marriage<br />
Discontent in my marriage<br />
Frequency Percent Valid Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Never 63 21.3 40.4 40.4<br />
Rarely 73 24.7 46.8 87.2<br />
Somewhat 13 4.4 8.3 95.5<br />
Moderately 3 1.0 1.9 97.4<br />
Often 2 .7 1.3 98.7<br />
Usually 2 .7 1.3 100.0<br />
Total 156 52.7 100.0<br />
Missing 140 7.3<br />
Total 296 100.0<br />
Homosexual Desires<br />
In Table 29, 291 of the 296 total respondents chose to answer Question B15<br />
on the survey regarding struggles <strong>with</strong> homosexual desires. Of those responding, 93% of<br />
the women have never struggled in this sexual area and another 6% indicated “rarely.”<br />
Only two students reported they face issues related to homosexual desires. Homosexuality<br />
is not a prevalent struggle <strong>for</strong> the women students at DTS.
119 <br />
Table 29. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Having Homosexual Desires<br />
Struggle <strong>with</strong> having homosexual desires<br />
Frequency Percent Valid Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Never 270 91.2 92.8 92.8<br />
Rarely 19 6.4 6.5 99.3<br />
Somewhat 1 .3 .3 99.7<br />
Always 1 .3 .3 100.0<br />
Total 291 8.3 100.0<br />
Missing 5 .7<br />
Total 296 100.0<br />
Masturbation<br />
The data in Table 30 indicates that 199 women students (68%) never have a<br />
struggle <strong>with</strong> sexual needs that they resolve <strong>with</strong> masturbation (Question B16). However<br />
the data shows that ninety-two students (32%) express practicing masturbation although<br />
half of these women (16%) state this is rarely an issue <strong>for</strong> them, leaving 16% who do<br />
struggle to some degree <strong>with</strong> sexual needs that they resolve <strong>with</strong> masturbation.<br />
Table 30. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Sexual Needs Resolved <strong>with</strong> Masturbation<br />
Struggle <strong>with</strong> sexual needs I resolve <strong>with</strong> masturbation<br />
Frequency Percent Valid Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Never 199 7.2 68.4 68.4<br />
Rarely 46 5.5 15.8 84.2<br />
Somewhat 21 .1 7.2 91.4<br />
Moderately 14 .7 4.8 96.2<br />
Often 10 .4 3.4 99.7<br />
Usually 1 .3 .3 100.0<br />
Total 291 8.3 100.0<br />
Missing 5 1.7<br />
Total 296 100.0
120 <br />
Doubts About Personal Faith and Beliefs<br />
Regarding having a struggle <strong>with</strong> doubts about personal faith and beliefs<br />
(Question B18), Table 31 shows that 236 students (80%) reported either “never” or<br />
“rarely” is this a struggle <strong>for</strong> them. Half of the women (148) reported “rarely,” indicating<br />
that on occasion doubts related to faith and beliefs do surface, but only 8% of the women<br />
students state they have much of a struggle related to their faith and beliefs. Hopefully<br />
their time spent at seminary will help them clarify and address some of their questions.<br />
Table 31. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Doubts About Faith and Beliefs<br />
Struggle <strong>with</strong> doubts about my faith and beliefs<br />
Valid<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Never 88 29.7 29.7 29.7<br />
Rarely 148 50.0 50.0 79.7<br />
Somewhat 36 12.2 12.2 91.9<br />
Moderately 13 4.4 4.4 96.3<br />
Often 9 3.0 3.0 99.3<br />
Usually 1 3 3 99.7<br />
Always 1 3 3 100.0<br />
Total 296 100.0 100.0<br />
Insecurity<br />
Table 32 indicates that over one half (54%) of the survey respondents struggle<br />
<strong>with</strong> some level of insecurity (Question (B22), although only 15% reported a high degree<br />
of struggle <strong>with</strong> feelings of insecurity. Only 29 students (10%) reported “never” having a<br />
struggle <strong>with</strong> feelings of insecurity. And another 36% respondents (107) women state this<br />
is rarely a problem <strong>for</strong> them.
121 <br />
Table 32. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Feelings of Insecurity<br />
Struggle <strong>with</strong> feelings of insecurity<br />
Frequency Percent Valid Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Never 29 9.8 9.8 9.8<br />
Rarely 107 36.1 36.3 46.1<br />
Somewhat 83 28.0 28.1 74.2<br />
Moderately 38 12.8 12.9 87.1<br />
Often 22 7.4 7.5 94.6<br />
Usually 14 4.7 4.7 99.3<br />
Always 2 .7 .7 100.0<br />
Total 295 99.7 100.0<br />
Missing 1 .3<br />
Total 296 100.0<br />
Comparison <strong>with</strong> Other Women<br />
When the students were asked about the issue of comparing themselves to<br />
other women (Question B23), 219 of them (74%) indicated from “somewhat” to<br />
“always.” Table 33 shows the distribution <strong>with</strong> only 26% of the respondents (76 women)<br />
saying that comparison <strong>with</strong> other women is rarely or never a problem. These results<br />
show that comparison <strong>with</strong> other women is one of the most significant problems the<br />
seminary women face.
122 <br />
Table 33. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Comparison to Other Women<br />
Struggle <strong>with</strong> comparison to other women<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Never 15 5.1 5.1 5.1<br />
Rarely 61 20.6 20.7 25.8<br />
Somewhat 82 27.7 27.8 53.6<br />
Moderately 59 19.9 20.0 73.6<br />
Often 49 16.6 16.6 90.2<br />
Usually 18 6.1 6.1 96.3<br />
Always 11 3.7 3.7 100.0<br />
Total 295 99.7 100.0<br />
Missing 1 .3<br />
Total 296 100.0<br />
Communicating Intentions Appropriately <strong>with</strong> Men<br />
<strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary has an enrollment of approximately 2000 students at the five<br />
campuses and online, <strong>with</strong> about 25% of that total being female students. Question B24<br />
asked the women whether or not they struggle <strong>with</strong> knowing how to communicate<br />
intentions <strong>with</strong> men appropriately. One hundred and ninety-five (65%) of the women<br />
students indicated they never or rarely have a struggle <strong>with</strong> knowing how to<br />
communicate their intentions appropriately <strong>with</strong> men. Seventy women (24%) reported<br />
having somewhat or moderate challenges in this area <strong>with</strong> Table 34 revealing that only<br />
10% (29 women) face this issue on a frequent basis.
123 <br />
Table 34. Communicating Intentions Appropriately <strong>with</strong> Men<br />
Struggle <strong>with</strong> knowing how to communicate intentions appropriately <strong>with</strong> men<br />
Valid<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Never 76 25.7 25.9 25.9<br />
Rarely 119 40.2 40.5 66.3<br />
Somewhat 45 15.2 15.3 81.6<br />
Moderately 25 8.4 8.5 90.1<br />
Often 21 7.1 7.1 97.3<br />
Usually 6 2.0 2.0 99.3<br />
Always 2 .7 .7 100.0<br />
Total 294 99.3 100.0<br />
Missing 2 .7<br />
Total 296 100.0<br />
Developing Friendships <strong>with</strong> Men<br />
Table 35 addresses Question B25 on the survey. The women were asked to<br />
evaluate how much difficulty they have developing meaningful friendships <strong>with</strong> DTS<br />
male students. Three distinct groups emerged from the 285 women who chose to answer<br />
this question. One third of the women (34%) rarely or never struggle <strong>with</strong> male<br />
relationships, a third (34%) indicate some struggle in this area, <strong>with</strong> the remaining third<br />
(32%) having significant problems developing meaningful relationships <strong>with</strong> DTS male<br />
students. These findings reveal that 66% of the women students find developing<br />
meaningful friendships <strong>with</strong> male students challenging to some degree.
124 <br />
Table 35. Difficulty Developing Meaningful Friendships <strong>with</strong> DTS Male Students<br />
Difficult to develop meaningful friendships <strong>with</strong> DTS male students<br />
Valid<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Never 26 8.8 9.1 9.1<br />
Rarely 72 24.3 25.3 34.4<br />
Somewhat 57 19.3 20.0 54.4<br />
Moderately 40 13.5 14.0 68.4<br />
Often 37 12.5 13.0 81.4<br />
Usually 33 11.1 11.6 93.0<br />
Always 20 6.8 7.0 100.0<br />
Total 285 96.3 100.0<br />
Missing 11 3.7<br />
Total 296 100.0<br />
Developing Friendships <strong>with</strong> Married Women<br />
Many women (44%) think they rarely or never have difficulty developing<br />
meaningful friendships <strong>with</strong> married DTS women students (Question B26), although just<br />
over half (56%) do think they have some degree of challenge connecting <strong>with</strong> married<br />
women students. Table 36 gives the specific distribution of responses and shows that only<br />
11% of the respondents have a high degree of problem making friends <strong>with</strong> the married<br />
women students.
125 <br />
Table 36. Difficulty Developing Meaningful Friendships <strong>with</strong> Married Women<br />
Students<br />
Difficult to develop meaningful friendships <strong>with</strong> married women students<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Never 32 10.8 11.1 11.1<br />
Rarely 95 32.1 32.9 43.9<br />
Somewhat 69 23.3 23.9 67.8<br />
Moderately 29 9.8 10.0 77.9<br />
Often 31 10.5 10.7 88.6<br />
Usually 21 7.1 7.3 95.8<br />
Always 12 4.1 4.2 100.0<br />
Total 289 97.6 100.0<br />
Missing 7 2.4<br />
Total 296 100.0<br />
Developing Friendships <strong>with</strong> Single Women<br />
Data gathered from both the single and married women students regarding the<br />
difficulty to develop meaningful friendships <strong>with</strong> the single women DTS students<br />
(Question B27) is reflected in Table 37. One hundred and twenty-six women (43%) feel<br />
they have some level of struggle establishing meaningful relationships <strong>with</strong> single<br />
students. Over half of the women (57%) state they have little or no difficulty developing<br />
relationships <strong>with</strong> single women students. The results suggest that all women students<br />
have more difficulty developing friendships <strong>with</strong> married students versus single students<br />
(43% versus 56%).
126 <br />
Table 37. Difficulty Developing Meaningful Friendships <strong>with</strong> Single Women<br />
Students<br />
Difficult to develop meaningful friendships <strong>with</strong> single women students<br />
Valid<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Never 46 15.5 15.9 15.9<br />
Rarely 118 39.9 40.7 56.6<br />
Somewhat 57 19.3 19.7 76.2<br />
Moderately 30 10.1 10.3 86.6<br />
Often 18 6.1 6.2 92.8<br />
Usually 16 5.4 5.5 98.3<br />
Always 5 1.7 1.7 100.0<br />
Total 290 98.0 100.0<br />
Missing 6 2.0<br />
Total 296 100.0<br />
The last five questions in part B of the survey were to be answered <strong>with</strong> a<br />
“yes” or a “no” response. These questions cover the issues of friendship, pornography,<br />
and sexual, verbal, emotional, and physical abuse.<br />
Satisfaction <strong>with</strong> Friendship/Support Network<br />
Question B28 asked the general question of whether or not the women<br />
students were currently satisfied <strong>with</strong> their support/friendship network at DTS. The data<br />
in Table 37 shows that 223 of the respondents (75%) feel satisfied <strong>with</strong> their personal<br />
relationships at DTS and 73 women (25%) feel they are not satisfied (see Table 38).
127 <br />
Table 38. Current Satisfaction <strong>with</strong> Support/Friendship Network<br />
Currently satisfied <strong>with</strong> support/friendship network<br />
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid<br />
Yes 223 75.3 75.3 75.3<br />
No 73 24.7 24.7 100.0<br />
Total 296 100.0 100.0<br />
Pornography<br />
The survey revealed that out of 295 students responding to Question B17,<br />
only seven (2%) reported “using, viewing, or reading” pornography. The other 288<br />
respondents (98%) indicated that they did not “use, view, or read” pornography. Only one<br />
student did not answer this question. Table 39 shows that using pornography is not an<br />
issue <strong>for</strong> the women students at <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary.<br />
Table 39. Use, View, or Read Pornography<br />
Use, view, or read pornography<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Yes 7 2.4 2.4 2.4<br />
No 288 97.3 97.6 100.0<br />
Total 295 99.7 100.0<br />
Missing 1 .3<br />
Total 296 100.0<br />
Sexual Activity<br />
Regarding the single women students’ current sexual activity (Question B29),<br />
it was very encouraging to discover that 100% of the 144 respondents of single status<br />
reported that they were not sexually active.
128 <br />
Sexual Abuse<br />
Table 40 indicates that approximately 19% of the 290 women responding<br />
have experienced sexual abuse (Question B30). Although the greater majority of women<br />
students (81%) have not been sexually abused, it is of concern to know that one fifth of<br />
the women students carry <strong>with</strong> them the emotional scars of being taken advantage of<br />
sexually. Table 40 reveals that six women chose not to answer this question.<br />
Table 40. Sexual Abuse<br />
Been sexually abused<br />
Frequency Percent Valid Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Yes 54 18.2 18.6 18.6<br />
No 236 79.7 81.4 100.0<br />
Total 290 98.0 100.0<br />
Missing 6 2.0<br />
Total 296 100.0<br />
Verbal and/or Emotional Abuse<br />
In response to Question B31 regarding whether or not the respondents had<br />
been verbally and/or emotionally abused, Table 41 indicates a much higher percentage of<br />
women students (44%) who answered the question <strong>with</strong> a “yes” response. These figures<br />
reveal a fairly close distribution of those who have been verbally and/or emotionally<br />
abused <strong>with</strong> those who have not experienced this type of abuse. It is significant to<br />
discover that almost half of the women students have experienced verbal and/or<br />
emotional abuse.
129 <br />
Table 41. Verbal and/or Emotional Abuse<br />
Been verbally and/or emotionally abused<br />
Frequency Percent Valid Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Yes 129 43.6 44.2 44.2<br />
No 163 55.1 55.8 100.0<br />
Total 292 98.6 100.0<br />
Missing 4 1.4<br />
Total 296 100.0<br />
Physical Abuse<br />
When asked to respond to Question B32 related to physical abuse, 11% of the<br />
respondents indicated this to be part of their history (Table 42). Even though the vast<br />
majority (89%) of the female students have not experienced physical abuse, it is still of<br />
concern that 33 women who responded to the survey have suffered physical abuse.<br />
Table 42. Physical Abuse<br />
Been physically abused<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Yes 33 11.1 11.3 11.3<br />
No 258 87.2 88.7 100.0<br />
Total 291 98.3 100.0<br />
Missing 5 1.7<br />
Total 296 100.0<br />
This concludes the results from the thirty-two questions in section B of the DTS<br />
women student survey which sought to discover the personal struggles of the female<br />
students. The next section on the survey (Section C) asked <strong>for</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation about the<br />
personal needs of the women while attending DTS.
130 <br />
Current Personal Needs While At DTS<br />
The third section of the survey (Section C) related to Hypothesis Four and<br />
Hypothesis Five and addressed the personal needs of the women students while they<br />
attend DTS. These questions focused on following topics: desire <strong>for</strong> mentoring<br />
relationships, meaningful friendships, financial need, abortion, accountability, dating and<br />
boundaries, marriage thought life, and family needs. The first five questions (C1 – C5)<br />
gave the option to answer “Yes” or “No” related to the need <strong>for</strong> female mentors.<br />
Need <strong>for</strong> Female Mentors and Christian Friends<br />
Past Female Mentor<br />
The first question (C1) in this third section asked, “In the past, I have had an<br />
older Christian woman to talk <strong>with</strong> regularly.” Table 43 indicates that 71% of the female<br />
respondents have, in the past, had an older Christian woman to talk <strong>with</strong> on a regular<br />
basis and 29% of the female students who responded have never had an older Christian<br />
woman to talk <strong>with</strong> regularly. These results reveal that nearly one third of the women<br />
students have not had a woman in their life whom they would consider a mentor.<br />
Table 43. Experience <strong>with</strong> an Older Christian Woman Regularly<br />
In past, had an older Christian woman to talk <strong>with</strong> regularly<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Yes 207 69.9 70.9 70.9<br />
No 85 28.7 29.1 100.0<br />
Total 292 98.6 100.0<br />
Missing 4 1.4<br />
Total 296 100.0
131 <br />
Current Female Mentor<br />
The second question (C2) followed up by asking, “Currently I have an older<br />
Christian woman to talk <strong>with</strong> regularly.” Table 44 shows the distribution of responses to<br />
Question C2. Of the 292 women who answered the question, 142 of them (49%) checked<br />
“Yes.” Half of the DTS women have an older Christian woman they meet and talk <strong>with</strong><br />
regularly.<br />
For those respondents who checked, “No,” they were directed to answer<br />
Question C3, “Would you like to have an older Christian woman to talk <strong>with</strong> on a regular<br />
basis?” Of the 150 women who indicated they did not currently have a female mentor,<br />
122 (81%) said they desire to have a woman <strong>with</strong> whom to meet and talk. Only twentysix<br />
women (17%) said they were not interested in having a female mentor. Two<br />
respondents did not answer the follow up question. It is evident that a significant majority<br />
of the women students who do not have a female mentor would like to have one.<br />
Table 44. Current Experience <strong>with</strong> a Female Mentor and/or Desire <strong>for</strong> a Mentor<br />
Currently have an older Christian woman to talk <strong>with</strong> regularly; if not: Would<br />
you like to have an older Christian woman to talk <strong>with</strong> on a regular basis?<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Yes 142 48.0 48.6 48.6<br />
No, but I would like 122 41.2 41.8 90.4<br />
one<br />
No, and I would not 26 8.8 8.9 99.3<br />
like one<br />
No (and answer<br />
missing to followup<br />
question)<br />
2 .7 .7 100.0<br />
Total 292 98.6 100.0<br />
Missing 4 1.4<br />
Total 296 100.0
132 <br />
Peer Spiritual Mentor<br />
Question C4 addressed the topic of Christian friends. It asked a response to<br />
the following statement: “I have a peer who is a spiritual mentor <strong>with</strong> whom I spend time<br />
regularly.” Of the 290 women who responded to the statement, 134 women (46%) said<br />
that they did have a peer as a spiritual mentor. Over one-half of the respondents (54%)<br />
indicated they did not have a peer as a spiritual mentor <strong>with</strong> whom they meet <strong>with</strong> on a<br />
regular basis (see Table 45).<br />
Table 45. Current Experience <strong>with</strong> a Peer Spiritual Mentor<br />
Have a peer as a spiritual mentor and meeting on a regular basis<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Yes 134 45.3 46.2 46.2<br />
No 156 52.7 53.8 100.0<br />
Total 290 98.0 100.0<br />
Missing 6 2.0<br />
Total 296 100.0<br />
Desire <strong>for</strong> a Peer Spiritual Mentor<br />
The final question (C5) related to female mentors, asked the women to<br />
indicate if they “would like to have a peer who would be a spiritual mentor <strong>for</strong> me <strong>with</strong><br />
whom I could spend time on a regular basis.” Table 46 shows that out of the 225 women<br />
students who responded to this question, 147 (65%) said that they would like to have a<br />
peer as a mentor to meet <strong>with</strong> on a regular basis. The remaining respondents (35%) said<br />
that they were not interested in having a peer mentor. Seventy-one respondents (24%)<br />
elected not to answer this question.
133 <br />
Table 46. Desire to Have a Peer as a Mentor<br />
Would like to have a peer as a mentor to meet on a regular basis<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Yes 147 49.7 65.3 65.3<br />
No 78 26.4 34.7 100.0<br />
Total 225 76.0 100.0<br />
Missing 71 24.0<br />
Total 296 100.0<br />
When the data from Question C4 which asked, “Would you like to have a peer<br />
as a mentor to meet <strong>with</strong> on a regular basis?” was cross-tabulated <strong>with</strong> Question C5, “I<br />
have a peer as a spiritual mentor and am meeting <strong>with</strong> her on a regular basis,” Table 47<br />
shows that of 225 respondents who answered both questions, 147 women already have a<br />
peer mentor. Of this group, <strong>for</strong>ty-two (29%) would like an additional peer mentor and<br />
one hundred and two do not need an additional mentor who is a peer. Another seventyeight<br />
women students stated that they do not have a peer mentor and thirty-four of them<br />
(44%) stated they would like to have a peer mentor. Overall, about a third of the women<br />
students at DTS would be interested in having a peer mentor.<br />
Table 47. Cross-tabulation of *Desire <strong>for</strong> a Peer Mentor and Have a Peer Mentor<br />
Would like to have a peer as a mentor to meet on a regular basis * Have a peer as<br />
a spiritual mentor and meeting on a regular basis – cross-tabulation<br />
Count<br />
Have a peer as a spiritual mentor and meeting on<br />
a regular basis<br />
Yes No Total<br />
Would like to have a peer Yes 42 105 147<br />
as a mentor to meet on a No 34 44 78<br />
regular basis Total 76 149 225
134 <br />
Close Friendship(s)<br />
Question C9 addressed the need women students have <strong>for</strong> close Christian<br />
friends. It stated, “I have a close friend(s) to spend time <strong>with</strong> on a regular basis.” Of the<br />
289 women who chose to answer this question, 236 (82%) said they have one or more<br />
close friends. Of concern was the fact that 53 of the respondents (18%) answered that<br />
they do not have a close friend (see Table 48).<br />
Table 48. Close Friend(s) Relationship<br />
Have a close friend(s) to spend time <strong>with</strong> regularly<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Yes 236 79.7 81.7 81.7<br />
No 53 17.9 18.3 100.0<br />
Total 289 97.6 100.0<br />
Missing 7 2.4<br />
Total 296 100.0<br />
Abortion<br />
Table 49 reveals that seven female students who have had an abortion in the<br />
past still have painful emotions and thoughts in which they need help to address. Over<br />
half of the respondents (58%) chose not to respond to this question about abortion. It does<br />
not necessarily mean that none of these 172 women have had an abortion, but rather that<br />
none of them need help in dealing <strong>with</strong> negative emotions related to abortion. The survey<br />
did not ask how many women may have had an abortion.
135 <br />
Table 49. Experienced an Abortion<br />
Had past abortion and still have painful emotions/thoughts I need help to work through<br />
Frequency Percent Valid<br />
Percent<br />
Cumulative<br />
Percent<br />
Valid Yes 7 2.4 5.6 5.6<br />
No 117 39.5 94.4 100.0<br />
Total 124 41.9 100.0<br />
Missing 172 58.1<br />
Additional Personal Needs<br />
Section C of the questionnaire also sought to discover other current personal<br />
needs of the women students while they attend DTS. Nine questions offered a sevenpoint<br />
Likert scale from “never” to “always” related to some possible personal needs the<br />
women students might have. Table 50 lists some of the individual needs and the<br />
distribution of the respondents’ answers. Figure 1 ranks these needs according to greatest<br />
need based on the mean score.<br />
Table 50. Reponses to Survey Questions C6, C8, and C10 – C16 on Needs<br />
Questions C6, C8, C10-C16<br />
In the order presented in the<br />
survey Resps Mean<br />
Std<br />
dev<br />
1<br />
Never<br />
2<br />
Rarel<br />
y<br />
3<br />
Some<br />
what<br />
4<br />
Mode<br />
rately<br />
5<br />
Often<br />
6<br />
Usual<br />
ly<br />
7<br />
Alwa<br />
ys<br />
C6. Have overwhelming<br />
financial needs 289 3.18 1.67 40 90 53 34 40 21 11<br />
C8. Difficult to meet other<br />
women DTS students 289 2.70 1.44 55 103 65 26 24 11 5<br />
C10. Difficult to meet and <strong>for</strong>m<br />
friendships <strong>with</strong> wives of DTS<br />
male students 276 4.34 1.86 18 36 54 32 35 64 37<br />
C11. Need more personal and<br />
relational connection <strong>with</strong><br />
female DTS students 285 3.12 1.55 38 83 66 35 38 19 6<br />
C12. As <strong>new</strong> student, needed<br />
someone to connect <strong>with</strong> 270 3.51 2.07 48 74 31 27 24 32 34<br />
C13. Need someone to be<br />
accountable to <strong>for</strong> attitudes and<br />
actions 288 3.96 1.79 19 50 64 45 48 25 37<br />
C14. Need help <strong>with</strong> do's and<br />
don'ts of dating and healthy<br />
boundaries 149 2.81 1.65 35 45 27 17 12 7 6<br />
C15. Desire to get married<br />
consumes thought-life 141 2.86 1.60 27 48 25 16 13 8 4<br />
C16. Have family needs/issues<br />
that are disruptive to academic<br />
work 293 2.71 1.40 43 128 54 26 27 11 4
136 <br />
Figure 1. Degree of Need<br />
Relationships Between Female Students and Student Wives<br />
Figure 4 ranks these women students’ needs in order of highest to lowest level<br />
of need based on the women students’ responses. The greatest difficulty that the women<br />
students have is to meet and <strong>for</strong>m friendships <strong>with</strong> the wives of DTS male students<br />
(Question C10). Eighty percent of the women indicated at least some level of difficulty<br />
developing relationships <strong>with</strong> seminary wives. This response is predictable since the DTS<br />
wives have little contact <strong>with</strong> the women students and the wives are either working or<br />
raising children whereas the women students are busy <strong>with</strong> studies, work, family, etc. So<br />
there is little time <strong>for</strong> these two groups of women to connect.
137 <br />
Accountability <strong>for</strong> Behavior and Actions<br />
The second highest need in this part of the survey related to the women<br />
wanting personal accountability (Question C13). A large number of the women (76%)<br />
reported that they need someone to be accountable to <strong>for</strong> their attitudes and actions. Half<br />
of the women (38%) indicated a somewhat or moderate need, whereas the other 38% felt<br />
a great need in this area.<br />
New Student Connection<br />
Related to the issue of female relationships (Question C12), the women<br />
students were asked to respond to the statement, “As a <strong>new</strong> student, I needed someone to<br />
connect <strong>with</strong> me as a friend on campus so I would not have felt so alone, nervous, or<br />
disconnected.” Of the 270 women who responded to this question, 148 (55%) indicated<br />
they thought it important <strong>for</strong> <strong>new</strong> students to have a returning student reach out to them<br />
when they are <strong>new</strong> to the DTS campus.<br />
Financial Needs<br />
When asked about financial issues (Question C6), 55% of the respondents<br />
(159 women) ranged from “somewhat” to “always” regarding feeling overwhelmed <strong>with</strong><br />
financial needs. Among this group, seventy-two women (25%) stated they often to<br />
always feel overwhelmed <strong>with</strong> financial needs.<br />
Desire <strong>for</strong> Personal and Relational Connection <strong>with</strong> Other Female Students<br />
Although the survey revealed that the women students don’t have a significant<br />
degree of difficulty meeting one another, 57% of the survey respondents expressed a<br />
desire <strong>for</strong> a more personal connection <strong>with</strong> other female students (Question C11). For<br />
35%, they have a somewhat/moderate need, but <strong>for</strong> 22% of the women, they indicated a<br />
much greater need <strong>for</strong> closer friendships <strong>with</strong> other women students.
138 <br />
Desire <strong>for</strong> Marriage<br />
Of the 141 single women who responded to the statement, “Desire to get<br />
married consumes my thought-life” (Question C15), 47% (66 women) indicated some<br />
level of mental distraction related to wanting to get married. Of this group, 25 of the<br />
women (18%) expressed that a very high amount of their thinking is consumed <strong>with</strong><br />
wanting to be married.<br />
Dating and Healthy Boundaries<br />
Forty-seven percent of the single women respondents indicated that they<br />
would like some help in understanding the “do’s and don’ts” of dating and establishing<br />
healthy boundaries in their relationships <strong>with</strong> men (Question C14). Of this group of<br />
women, 17% of them felt they have a high degree of need in this area.<br />
Relationships Among Female Students<br />
Contrary to the difficulty of women students connecting relationally <strong>with</strong><br />
wives of the male students, the women students indicated that meeting other DTS women<br />
students was much less difficult (Question C8). Only 14% of the women students<br />
revealed a great a significant degree of difficulty developing relationships <strong>with</strong> other<br />
women students. They share classes together, often eat lunch together, work on<br />
assignments together, live on campus together, attend Women Students’ Fellowship<br />
activities and programs, etc. The women students have more in common <strong>with</strong> one another<br />
so they more easily are able to <strong>for</strong>m friendships <strong>with</strong> one another.<br />
Family Needs<br />
The final question in Section C asked the women students to indicate if they<br />
face family needs and issues that are disruptive to their academic work at DTS (Question<br />
C16a). If so, they were given space to write specifically what those needs or issues were<br />
(Question 16b). Of the 296 survey respondents, 129 of the women (44%) listed one or<br />
more family issues that they deal <strong>with</strong> as they continue their seminary training. The
139 <br />
following are the most frequently mentioned issues <strong>with</strong> the number of women who cited<br />
each:<br />
Needs and relationship <strong>with</strong> parents – 29<br />
Husband’s needs and issues - 27<br />
Illness/aging of family members – 21<br />
Children’s needs – 20<br />
Time management and balance- 11<br />
Finances - 11<br />
Parenting teenagers – 10<br />
Working a job and time demands – 7<br />
Divorce of parents – 7<br />
Sibling Problems – 6<br />
Tiredness - 6<br />
Adults children needs – 5<br />
Emotionally unhealthy family members – 5<br />
Grandchildren – 4<br />
Time <strong>with</strong> family – 4<br />
Depression - 3<br />
Distance from family – 3<br />
Health issues – 3<br />
Eating Disorder – 2<br />
Issues that were mentioned only one time include Busyness, Car problems, Childcare,<br />
Domestic responsibilities, Doubt, Expecting a baby, Faith in the workplace, Friends<br />
faraway, Guilt/shame, Loneliness, Medical needs, Opposition, Personal health issues,<br />
Privacy issues to study, Roommate issues, and Single parenting.<br />
Topics <strong>for</strong> Programming, Seminars, and Speakers at DTS<br />
The fourth section of the survey sought to discover what types of extracurricular<br />
seminars, speakers, and other opportunities to enrich the women’s academic<br />
education would be most helpful to the female students. The options <strong>for</strong> responses ranged<br />
from “no need” to “greatest need”. Table 51 lists the options by question and presents all<br />
the responses in each category (Question D1). This is followed by Figure 5 which ranks<br />
them in order of importance to the women based on the mean score.<br />
When ranking the responses according to the percentage of women indicating<br />
some level of need in each area (some need to greatest need), the results were:
140 <br />
Close friend (89%)<br />
A meaningful relationship <strong>with</strong> faculty or staff (82%)<br />
An older Christian woman as a mentor (77%)<br />
Opportunity to get to know wives of male students (72%)<br />
Training in dating and social skills (58%)<br />
Seminars addressing common personal struggles (53%)<br />
Extra-curricular social activities on campus (26%)<br />
When combining just the responses of the women who indicated often to greatest<br />
need, the order remained the same even though the percentages were less. These were:<br />
Close friend (60%)<br />
A meaningful relationship <strong>with</strong> faculty or staff (58%)<br />
An older Christian woman as a mentor (56%)<br />
Opportunity to get to know wives of male students (36%)<br />
Training in dating and social skills (25%)<br />
Seminars addressing common personal struggles (17%)<br />
Extra-curricular social activities on campus (8%)
141 <br />
Table 51. Non-Academic Needs as a DTS Student<br />
Since becoming a student at DTS, my non-academic needs have been to<br />
have:<br />
Questions D1-a through D1-g<br />
In the order presented in the survey Resps Mean<br />
an older Christian woman as a mentor 289 2.94 1.43 66 62 30 86 45<br />
meaningful relationship <strong>with</strong> faculty<br />
or staff 288 3.00 1.36 51 70 38 86 43<br />
close friend 288 2.96 1.17 32 82 64 85 25<br />
seminars addressing common<br />
personal struggles 288 1.91 1.06 134 81 41 28 4<br />
extra-curricular social activities on<br />
campus 287 1.39 0.77 211 54 12 7 3<br />
opportunity to get to know wives of<br />
male students 286 2.33 1.16 79 105 43 48 11<br />
training in dating and social skills 287 1.82 0.90 121 118 28 18 2<br />
Std<br />
dev<br />
1 No need<br />
2 Some need<br />
3 Often needed<br />
4 Significantly needed<br />
5 Greatest need<br />
The following bar graph (Figure 2) indicates the responses of Table 51. The<br />
need <strong>for</strong> an older Christian woman as a mentor (3.00), the need <strong>for</strong> meaningful<br />
relationship <strong>with</strong> faculty or staff (2.96), and the need <strong>for</strong> a close friend (2.94) are the top<br />
three needs indicated by the women students.
142 <br />
Figure 2. Size of Non-academic Needs<br />
Table 52 and Figure 3 indicate the topics that the female students would like<br />
to have speakers address at special events (Question D2). The results revealed that topics<br />
of greatest interest from highest to lowest were: time management, marriage, healthy<br />
body image, depression, grief, divorce, eating disorders, homosexuality, and abortion.
143 <br />
Table 52. Desired Speaker Topics<br />
I would like to have speakers on any of the following subjects:<br />
Questions D2-a through D2-i<br />
In the order presented in the survey Resps Mean<br />
Abortion 272 1.46 0.87 195 48 9 20 0<br />
Depression 277 2.51 1.30 77 82 39 57 22<br />
Divorce 274 1.85 1.16 154 53 24 39 4<br />
eating disorders 271 1.85 1.14 149 55 32 28 7<br />
Homosexuality 274 1.50 0.92 192 49 13 17 3<br />
Marriage 279 2.97 1.35 55 56 48 83 37<br />
Grief 273 2.42 1.28 81 82 47 41 22<br />
Time management 280 3.14 1.38 44 60 47 72 57<br />
Healthy body image 277 2.73 1.32 59 82 42 64 30<br />
Std<br />
dev<br />
1 No need<br />
2 Some need<br />
3 Often needed<br />
4Significantly needed<br />
5 Greatest need<br />
The bar graph (Figure 3) indicates the data from Table 52 above.<br />
Figure 3. Speaker Topics Desired According to Need
144 <br />
Recommended Program or Speaker Topics<br />
The students were also given the opportunity to write in any additional<br />
suggestions of topics they would like to have addressed that were not on the above chart.<br />
The following list includes recommendations of ninety women who filled in Question<br />
D2j on their survey <strong>with</strong> the number of times a suggestion was cited:<br />
Singleness – 14<br />
Women in ministry – 13<br />
Stress management – 6<br />
Anxiety/fear – 6<br />
Finances – 6<br />
Ministry opportunities - 6<br />
Time management and balance – 6<br />
Boundaries – 4<br />
Computer and writing papers skills - 4<br />
Male/Female relationships on campus (students and faculty) - 4<br />
Trusting God – 3<br />
Celibacy/sexual purity – 3<br />
Communication skills – 3<br />
Conflict resolution/management – 3<br />
Pornography and differences <strong>for</strong> men and women – 3<br />
The following topics were mentioned by two students each:<br />
Abuse, Alcohol or drug abuse, Burnout and discouragement, Expectation in<br />
ministry, Infertility, Mission opportunities and issues <strong>for</strong> women, Relating and<br />
ministering to unbelievers, Sexuality, Spiritual life, Working <strong>with</strong> male<br />
leadership, and no more speakers.<br />
In addition, the following topics were mentioned by just one student:<br />
Aging parents, Balancing truth and grace/love, Church issues in America,<br />
Connection <strong>with</strong> other pastors’ wives, Control issues, Counseling singles,<br />
Counseling services at DTS, Defensive skills, Discussion rather than lecture<br />
<strong>for</strong>mat, Discussions <strong>with</strong> women from other seminaries, Dry spells in<br />
ministry, Family restoration, God’s calling versus men and marriage, Health<br />
and wellness, Ill spouse, Insecurity, Intramurals, Living out faith practically,<br />
loneliness, Loving other Christians, Marriage/courtship preparation,<br />
Masturbation, Mentoring others, Nutrition, Parenting, Perfectionism, Purpose,<br />
Relationships <strong>with</strong> male faculty, Service opportunities, Shame and healing<br />
from past sins, Single over 40, Single parenting, and Success God’s way.
145 <br />
Survey Correlations<br />
The first hypothesis of this study states, “Needs and issues will differ <strong>for</strong><br />
<strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary female students based on the demographic factors of<br />
younger and older students, of single and married students, and of Th.M. and M.A.<br />
students.” Hypotheses Two and Hypotheses Three predicted that some of the highest<br />
personal issues <strong>for</strong> the DTS women students would include depression, loneliness, selfimage,<br />
self-acceptance, and self-confidence, and the need <strong>for</strong> meaningful relationships<br />
<strong>with</strong> men and women. The following figures and tables represent the breakdown<br />
according to marital status, age, and degree program <strong>for</strong> each of these highest personal<br />
issues. Most of the tabulations <strong>for</strong> percentages will be inclusive <strong>for</strong> the ratings of<br />
“somewhat to always” since this study seeks to discover the issues in which the women<br />
students struggle. The degree to which they struggle <strong>with</strong> an issue can be seen separately<br />
in each category in the Tables and Figures.<br />
Depression<br />
According to the results of the survey, a significantly greater number of single<br />
students (44%) face some level (“somewhat” to “always”) of depression versus 28% of<br />
married women. When comparing age groups, younger women have slightly more<br />
problems (38%) than older women (33%) <strong>with</strong> depression. (See pages 97-98 to define the<br />
meaning of “younger” or “older” students.) Regarding degree programs, there was<br />
minimal difference concerning depression among the Th.M., M.A., and “other students.”<br />
(See page 99 to define the meaning of “other students.”) All degree programs showed<br />
about a third of their women students face some level of struggle <strong>with</strong> depression,<br />
although there were twice as many respondents who checked “somewhat” (19%)<br />
compared to 10% who checked “moderately.” See Figure 4 <strong>for</strong> comparisons related to<br />
depression according to marital status and Figure 5 <strong>for</strong> comparisons according<br />
to age.
146 <br />
Figure 4. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Depression by Marital Status<br />
Figure 5. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Depression by Age
147 <br />
Loneliness<br />
The survey revealed that a significantly greater number of single women<br />
students (72%) struggle <strong>with</strong> personal the issue of loneliness from “somewhat to always"<br />
versus the married women students (38%). The comparison of the age groups revealed<br />
that of the younger women, 68% also have a greater difficulty <strong>with</strong> the issue of loneliness<br />
than 43% of the older female respondents (see Figures 6 and 7). When comparing the<br />
degree programs, there was almost no difference concerning the issue of loneliness<br />
between the Th.M., M.A., CGS degrees, and other students. All of the degree progams<br />
showed that about half of their women students have some level of stuggle <strong>with</strong><br />
loneliness (Table 53).<br />
Figure 6. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Loneliness by Marital Status
148 <br />
Figure 7. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Loneliness by Age<br />
Table 53. DTS Degree and Loneliness Cross-tabulation<br />
DTS Degree * Struggle <strong>with</strong> loneliness cross-tabulation<br />
Total<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
DTS<br />
Degree ThM 4 15 13 4 5 2 0 43<br />
MA 24 68 56 30 24 8 3 213<br />
CGS 1 6 5 0 1 2 0 15<br />
Other 3 13 3 2 4 0 0 25<br />
Total 32 102 77 36 34 12 3 296
149 <br />
Low Self-Esteem<br />
The issue of low self-esteem is reflected in Figure 8 showing the range of<br />
struggle <strong>with</strong>in the two age categories. The female students in the 20-29 years of age<br />
category show that 61% have a struggle <strong>with</strong> low self-esteem. Comparatively, the 30+<br />
years of age students show 44% who struggle <strong>with</strong> low self-esteem. These results reveal<br />
that younger women students have a significantly greater struggle <strong>with</strong> low self-esteem<br />
than older women students.<br />
Figure 8. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Low Self-Esteem by Age<br />
Figure 9 reveals a similar distribution based on marital status of the female<br />
respondents related to low self-esteem <strong>with</strong> the singles indicating 61% who have<br />
difficulty and the married respondents having a 43% rate of struggle <strong>with</strong> low selfesteem.
150 <br />
Figure 9. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Low Self-Esteem by Marital Status<br />
Perfectionism<br />
The data from the survey reveals that there is little difference among single<br />
and married students related to the struggle <strong>with</strong> perfectionism. The 143 single women<br />
respondents indicated (Figure 10) that 84% have a somewhat to always struggle <strong>with</strong><br />
perfectionism, and interestingly, 83% of the married female respondents (152) have<br />
almost exactly the same degree of struggle <strong>with</strong> the issue.
151 <br />
Figure 10. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Perfectionism by Marital Status<br />
Whereas there is not much difference based on marital status in regards to the<br />
issue of perfectionism, there is a small gap based on age. Of the respondents in the 20-29<br />
age group, 88% of the women have somewhat to always struggle <strong>with</strong> the issue. A<br />
slightly smaller number (79%) of older women (ages 30+) face issues <strong>with</strong> perfectionism<br />
(see Figure 11).
152 <br />
Figure 11. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Perfectionism by Age<br />
The cross-tabulation of the struggle <strong>with</strong> perfectionism between the different<br />
degree programs are indicated in Table 54. In the M.A. programs, 86% of the women<br />
feel they deal <strong>with</strong> some level of struggle <strong>with</strong> perfectionism versus 77% of Th.M.<br />
women students indicate somewhat to always a problem <strong>with</strong> perfectionism.<br />
Table 54. DTS Degree and Perfectionism Cross-tabulation<br />
DTS Degree * Struggle <strong>with</strong> perfectionism cross-tabulation<br />
Total<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
DTS<br />
Degree ThM 1 9 14 8 5 3 3 43<br />
MA 12 18 54 31 50 37 11 213<br />
CGS 2 3 1 3 1 4 1 15<br />
Other 0 4 6 2 6 6 0 24<br />
Total 15 34 75 44 62 50 15 295
153 <br />
Personal Body Image<br />
Figure 12 indicates the degree to which the respondents struggle <strong>with</strong> their<br />
personal body image based on marital status. It can be noted that there is little difference<br />
between the single respondents (59%) as compared to the married respondents (52%) in<br />
the total responses of “somewhat to always” having a struggle <strong>with</strong> personal body image.<br />
Figure 12. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Personal Body Image by Marital Status<br />
The cross-tabulation between the two age categories (Figure 13) indicates that<br />
there is a slight difference between those in the younger age group (60%) than those in<br />
the older age group of respondents (51%) regarding issues of body image.This reveals<br />
that at least half of the women in both age groups struggle <strong>with</strong> personal body image.
154 <br />
Figure 13. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Personal Body Image by Age<br />
When comparing women in different degree plans (Table 55) related to body<br />
image, the results showed a wider range of differences. Within the M.A. group of<br />
women, 59% struggle <strong>with</strong> body image, whereas 42% of Th.M. women have the same<br />
problem.<br />
Table 55. DTS Degree and Unhealthy Body Image Cross-tabulation<br />
DTS Degree * Struggle <strong>with</strong> an unhealthy personal body image<br />
cross-tabulation<br />
DTS<br />
Degree<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always Total<br />
ThM 5 20 12 3 3 0 0 43<br />
MA 23 63 53 35 22 10 6 212<br />
CGS 3 2 3 2 2 1 2 15<br />
Other 2 13 3 0 4 3 0 25<br />
Total 33 98 71 40 31 14 8 295
155 <br />
Self-Confidence<br />
Regarding having a struggle <strong>with</strong> self-confidence (or the lack of confidence),<br />
the results of the study (Figure 14) show that there is no difference between the single<br />
and married respondents on this issue. Of the single respondents, 51% indicated a<br />
struggle from “somewhat to always” <strong>with</strong> self-confidence and of the married respondents,<br />
the same percentage, 51%, indicated issues related to self-confidence.<br />
Figure 14. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Self-Confidence by Marital Status<br />
The cross-tabulation between the two age categories reflected in Figure 15<br />
indicates that there is a fairly significant difference between those in the younger age<br />
group (55%) than those in the older age group of respondents (45%) regarding the issue<br />
of self-confidence. These findings reveal that younger women students have a greater<br />
struggle <strong>with</strong> self-confidence than do the older women.
156 <br />
Figure 15. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Self-Confidence by Age<br />
According to the different degree programs, the Th.M. students (30%) had a<br />
significantly less difficult time <strong>with</strong> the issue self-confidence than the M.A. students<br />
(49%). The CGS students showed an even higher response <strong>with</strong> 57% of them struggling<br />
<strong>with</strong> self-confidence whereas a lower number of women (46%) in the “other”<br />
classification of students face this issue (see Table 56).<br />
Table 56. DTS Degree and Low Self-Confidence Cross-tabulation<br />
DTS Degree * Struggle <strong>with</strong> low self-confidence cross-tabulation<br />
Count<br />
Total<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately<br />
Ofte<br />
n Usually Always<br />
DTS<br />
Degree ThM 4 24 8 4 2 0 1 43<br />
MA 12 86 61 35 15 2 1 212<br />
CGS 2 4 5 3 0 0 1 15<br />
Other 2 11 9 2 1 0 0 25<br />
Total 20 125 83 44 18 2 3 295
157 <br />
Insecurity<br />
The gap is wider based on marital status related to issues of insecurity when<br />
compared to self-confidence. With the single women students, 61% of them experience<br />
different levels of insecurity versus 42% of married women. Figure 16 shows the<br />
percentage at each of the level of responses.<br />
Figure 16 . Struggle <strong>with</strong> Insecurity According to Marital Status
158 <br />
Figure 17. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Insecurity by Age<br />
The difference of struggle <strong>with</strong> feelings of insecurity when cross-tabulated<br />
between the different degree programs is minimal. The Th.M. respondents (41%), M.A.<br />
respondents (46%), CGS respondents (47%), and other program respondents (52%) were<br />
very close in the degree to which they struggle <strong>with</strong> feelings of insecurity (Table 57).<br />
Table 57. DTS Degree and Insescurity Cross-tabulation<br />
DTS Degree * Struggle <strong>with</strong> feelings of insecurity cross-tabulation<br />
Total<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately<br />
Ofte<br />
n Usually Always<br />
DTS<br />
Degree ThM 4 19 12 4 2 2 0 43<br />
MA 19 75 62 28 18 9 1 212<br />
CGS 3 5 3 0 1 2 1 15<br />
Other 3 8 6 6 1 1 0 25<br />
Total 29 107 83 38 22 14 2 295
159 <br />
Discontentment <strong>with</strong> Singleness<br />
The single female students were asked to indicate whether or not they were<br />
discontent in their single marital status. The respondents, according to age categories in<br />
Figure 18, revealed that the younger students (62%) had only a little higher incidence<br />
<strong>with</strong> this struggle <strong>with</strong> discontentment of being single than the older students (52%).<br />
Figure 18.Discontentment <strong>with</strong> Singleness by Age<br />
Table 58 shows the correlation between the different degree programs based<br />
on those who struggle <strong>with</strong> discontentment in their single marital status. Slightly more<br />
M.A. women students (61%) find their marital status challenging than the Th.M. women<br />
students (54%).
160 <br />
Table 58. DTS Degree and Discontentment <strong>with</strong> Singleness Cross-tabulation<br />
DTS Degree * Discontent in my singleness cross-tabulation<br />
Total<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately<br />
Ofte<br />
n Usually Always<br />
DTS<br />
Degree ThM 5 6 6 5 1 1 0 24<br />
MA 8 33 32 13 11 5 4 106<br />
CGS 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 3<br />
Other 2 4 2 2 0 0 0 10<br />
Total 15 45 41 20 12 6 4 143<br />
Difficulty Handling Stress<br />
The difficulty handling stress by the students according to marital status is<br />
revealed in Figure 19. Again, a close percentage is indicated <strong>with</strong> there being 66% in the<br />
single status and 70% in the married status saying they have difficulty handling stress<br />
while attending and studying at DTS.<br />
Figure 19. Difficulty Handling Stress by Marital Status
161 <br />
Figure 20 indicates the respondents by age and the difficulty they have<br />
handling stress. As in marital status, there is little difference in difficulty handling stress<br />
based on age. Those respondents in the younger age group totaled 70% while those in<br />
the older student group ranked <strong>with</strong> a close total of 67%. The totals were fairly close<br />
between degree programs also. M.A. women students indicated a 70% total and the<br />
Th.M. students totaled 63% (see Table 59).<br />
Figure 20. Difficulty Handling Stress by Age<br />
Table 59. DTS Degree and Difficulty Handling Stress Cross-tabulation<br />
DTS Degree * Difficulty handling stress cross-tabulation<br />
Total<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
DTS<br />
Degree ThM 0 16 16 7 3 1 0 43<br />
MA 8 56 80 32 18 14 5 213<br />
CGS 0 3 6 3 0 2 1 15<br />
Other 0 11 10 3 1 0 0 25
Total 8 86 112 45 22 17 6 296<br />
162
163 <br />
Struggle <strong>with</strong> Comparing Self to Other Women<br />
The married respondents (79%) indicated a somewhat greater degree of<br />
struggle <strong>with</strong> comparing themselves to other women or peers. A slightly smaller<br />
percentage of the single women (69%) have a significant struggle <strong>with</strong> comparison<br />
shown in Figure 21.<br />
Figure 21. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Comparing Self to Other Women by Marital Status<br />
Struggle <strong>with</strong> Comparison to Other Women<br />
Single and Married Respondents<br />
The cross-tabulation of ages (Figure 22) based on a struggle <strong>with</strong> comparison<br />
<strong>with</strong> other women found a much higher percentage (83%) of the single women deal <strong>with</strong><br />
this problems than older female students (67%).
164 <br />
Figure 22. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Comparing Self to Women by Age<br />
Struggle <strong>with</strong> Comparison to Other Women<br />
Respondents by Age Categories<br />
When cross-tabulating the struggle <strong>with</strong> comparison to other women between<br />
degree programs (Table 60), the data revealed that M.A. students have a signficantly<br />
greater problem <strong>with</strong> this issue of comparison (78%) versus Th.M. students (53%).<br />
Table 60. DTS Degree and Struggle <strong>with</strong> Comparison to Other Women Cross- tabulation<br />
DTS Degree * Struggle <strong>with</strong> comparison to other women cross-tabulation<br />
Total<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
DTS<br />
Degree<br />
ThM 4 15 9 7 6 1 1 43<br />
MA 8 38 61 48 34 15 8 212<br />
CGS 1 3 3 2 3 1 2 15<br />
Other 2 5 9 2 6 1 0 25<br />
Total 15 61 82 59 49 18 11 295
165 <br />
Relationships <strong>with</strong> Male Students<br />
DTS has been a co-ed campus <strong>for</strong> over thirty years. The cross-tabulation<br />
shown in Figure 23 indicates the number of female students, single (77%) and married<br />
(55%), who have difficulty <strong>with</strong> developing healthy, meaningful relationships <strong>with</strong> the<br />
male students at DTS. The data shows that over half of both single and married students<br />
find relationships <strong>with</strong> male students challenging, though a much larger percentage of<br />
single women struggle <strong>with</strong> relationships <strong>with</strong> their male peers. This is a predictable<br />
result since it stands to reason that singles would find relationships <strong>with</strong> the opposite sex<br />
more complex and difficult since married women do not face the same relational needs.<br />
Figure 23. Difficulty <strong>with</strong> Relationships <strong>with</strong> Male Students by Marital Status<br />
Difficulty <strong>with</strong> Male Student Relationships<br />
Single and Married Respondents<br />
Figure 24 correlates the breakdown of the respondents by age groups<br />
regarding difficulty <strong>with</strong> male students relationships. The younger female respondents<br />
(72%) have the greater difficulty than the older students (59%). Interestingly, the<br />
breakdown by age (Fig. 24) and the breakdown by marital status (Fig. 23) indicated
166 <br />
approximately the same percentages in each category when comparing younger<br />
unmarrieds <strong>with</strong> older married female students.<br />
Figure 24. Difficulty <strong>with</strong> Relationships <strong>with</strong> Male Students by Age<br />
According to the different degree plans in Table 61, there is almost even<br />
distribution of difficulty <strong>with</strong> developing meaningful relationships <strong>with</strong> DTS male<br />
students: Th.M. (48%), M.A. (51%), CGS (50%). Those students in “other” degree plans<br />
(33%) have a significantly less difficulty <strong>with</strong> this issue.<br />
Table 61. DTS Degree and Relationships <strong>with</strong> Male Students Cross-tabulation<br />
DTS Degree * Difficult to develop meaningful relationships <strong>with</strong> DTS male students<br />
cross-tabulation<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately<br />
Ofte<br />
n Usually Always<br />
DTS<br />
Degree ThM 5 11 6 9 5 7 0 43<br />
MA 19 49 43 30 28 21 17 207<br />
CGS 1 3 4 0 2 1 1 12<br />
Other 1 9 4 1 2 4 2 23
167 <br />
Total 26 72 57 40 37 33 20 285<br />
Relationship <strong>with</strong> an Older Christian Woman<br />
As illustrated in Figure 25, there is almost even distribution of those younger<br />
female respondents (47%) who have an older Christian woman to talk <strong>with</strong> compared to<br />
the older female respondents (50%) who also have this type of relationship.<br />
Figure 25. Current Relationship <strong>with</strong> an Older Christian Woman by Age<br />
Have Older Christian Woman to Talk With<br />
Respondents by Age Categories<br />
However, when looking at the distribution of married students as compared to<br />
the single respondents (Figure 26), the single population of female students have a far<br />
higher (77%) experience <strong>with</strong> having an older Christian woman <strong>with</strong> whom they can talk<br />
on a regular basis than the married women (55%). In the cross-tabulation between degree<br />
plans (Table 62), there is an even distribution (50%) between those female students in the<br />
Th.M. and M.A. degree plans who have an older Christian woman to talk <strong>with</strong> regularly.
168 <br />
Figure 26. Current Relationship <strong>with</strong> Older Christian Woman by Marital Status<br />
Have Older Christian Woman to Talk With<br />
Single and Married Respondents<br />
Table 62. DTS Degree and Relationship <strong>with</strong> an Older Woman Cross-tabulation<br />
DTS Degree * Currently have an older Christian woman to talk <strong>with</strong><br />
regularly cross-tabulation<br />
Total<br />
Yes No<br />
DTS<br />
Degree ThM 23 20 43<br />
MA 101 109 210<br />
CGS 9 6 15<br />
Other 9 15 24<br />
Total 142 150 292<br />
Desire <strong>for</strong> a Female Mentor <br />
Figure 27 indicates the response to the question, “If you do not have an older<br />
Christian woman <strong>with</strong> whom to talk on a regular basis, would you like to have one?” A<br />
total of 92% of the single female respondents who answered “no” to this question<br />
indicated they would like to have such a relationship. Of the married female students,
169 <br />
73% also responded positively to the question and would like to have an older Christian<br />
woman <strong>with</strong> whom to have conversation on a regular basis.<br />
Figure 27. Desire <strong>for</strong> a Female Mentor by Marital Status<br />
The cross-tabulation by age groups of those students who do not currently<br />
have an older Christian woman <strong>with</strong> whom to interact reveals the same percentages as<br />
those based on marial status. Of the younger female respondents, 93% compared to the<br />
73% of the older female respondents would like to have an older Christian woman <strong>with</strong><br />
whom to communicate <strong>with</strong> on a regular basis.<br />
Though the younger student response is significantly higher (92%) than the<br />
older student response (73%), at least three-fourths in both groups indicate a very strong<br />
desire to have a committed relationship <strong>with</strong> an older Christian woman (see Figure 28).
170 <br />
Figure 28. Desire <strong>for</strong> a Female Mentor by Age<br />
Table 63 reveals the desire of the students in the different degree plans to have<br />
a relationship <strong>with</strong> an older Christian woman. The distribution was 73% of Th.M., 85%<br />
of M.A., 100% of CGS, and 64% of the students in “other” degree plans.<br />
Table 63. DTS Degree and Desire <strong>for</strong> a Female Mentor Cross-tabulation<br />
DTS Degree * If answered No to C.2., would you like to have an older<br />
Christian woman to talk <strong>with</strong> on a regular basis cross-tabulation<br />
Total<br />
Yes No<br />
DTS<br />
Degree ThM 14 5 19<br />
MA 93 16 109<br />
CGS 6 0 6<br />
Other 9 5 14<br />
Total 122 26 148
171 <br />
Concluding Comments from Survey<br />
In the final section of the survey the students were given the option to answer<br />
“Yes” or “No” to the following question: “Are there any needs you have or struggles you<br />
face which were not covered on this survey?” (Question E1). If they checked “Yes,” then<br />
Question E2 stated, “If YES, what are those needs and/or struggles?” There were ninetyeight<br />
women who checked “Yes” on their survey and then wrote in responses to Question<br />
E2. The top additional personal issues follow <strong>with</strong> the number of women who made<br />
mention of each of the struggles they face:<br />
Finances/budgeting – 8<br />
Time management and balance - 6<br />
Past sins/guilt/shame – 5<br />
Role of women in ministry and home issues – 5<br />
Working <strong>with</strong> male leadership – 4<br />
Disconnect/support from DTS <strong>for</strong> extension students - 4<br />
Transition after DTS – 4<br />
Women over 40 issues – 4<br />
Parenting – 4<br />
Fellowship times <strong>with</strong> other women students – 3<br />
Identity and worth – 3<br />
Racial issues/reconciliation/understanding of differences – 3<br />
Spiritual gifts and giftedness – 3<br />
Spiritual life health - 3<br />
African American students’ needs – 3<br />
Church involvement - 2<br />
Co-dependency – 2<br />
Divorced women – 2<br />
Family heritage issues - 2<br />
Gender bias at DTS – 2<br />
Gender and biblical femininity – 2<br />
International students’ needs – 2<br />
Mentor <strong>with</strong> ministry experience – 2<br />
Sexism at DTS – 2<br />
ThM biases towards men and male pastors – 2<br />
Additional suggestions each mentioned by only one student include: Aging parents<br />
(care), Behavior of single DTS students, Blended families, Connection <strong>with</strong> distant<br />
friends, Counseling services, Counseling skills, Dating, Employment, Exercise and<br />
healthy eating, Female faculty need, Forgiveness, Health issues, Male students hunting<br />
<strong>for</strong> wives, Meals <strong>with</strong> female faculty, On-line student disconnect, Outside DTS support<br />
systems, Over-commitment, Over-eating, Personal spiritual life, Practical ministry
172 <br />
experience, Prayer groups, Resting in God’s will, Retreats (more of them), Selfhatred/condemnation,<br />
Serving <strong>with</strong> husband’s in ministry, Suicidal thoughts, Trusting<br />
God, TV addiction, Understanding parents, and Worry.<br />
Summary<br />
Demographic Results<br />
In January 2008, a descriptive survey was sent out to the 600 enrolled female<br />
students of <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary. Two-hundred and ninety-eight surveys (50%) were<br />
completed and returned by the female seminarians. Of the 298 surveys received back,<br />
296 were determined to be valid useable surveys (52%). Minimum demographic<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation was gathered in order to protect anonimity and to allow total honest feedback<br />
from the students.<br />
The respondents ranged in age from 20-70 years. The 296 respondents were<br />
divided into two major categories, younger students (20-29) and older students (30-70).<br />
An evenly distributed number of respondents of all ages (at the time of the survey)<br />
returned their survey, younger students (47%), and older students (53%).<br />
The survey revealed an almost evenly distributed number of 144 single female<br />
students <strong>with</strong> the 152 married female students. These distributions of both age and<br />
marital status make the results of this survey a reliable respresentation of the entire<br />
female student population enrolled at <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary in spring semester,<br />
2008.<br />
The majority of female students enrolled at <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary are in the<br />
M.A.degree programs and 72% of the survey respondents were M.A. students as<br />
compared to 15% of respondents who were enrolled in the Th.M. degree program.<br />
Another 5% of the respondents were in the Certificate of Graduate Studies program, and<br />
the remaining 8% of respondents designated as “other” were enrolled as either Ph.D. or<br />
D.Min. students at the time of the completion of this survey.
173 <br />
The majority of respondents (70%) were female students (207) attending<br />
classes on the <strong>Dallas</strong> Campus. The remaining 89 respondents (30%) were either students<br />
at one of the DTS Extension sites or On-line students. Of those 296 respondents, 105<br />
indicated they were full-time students carrying twelve or more hours, and 184 indicated<br />
they were part-time students carrying twelve hours or less.<br />
The last two demographic questions addressed the student’s participation in<br />
the DTS program known as Spiritual Formation which is required of all students except<br />
those who are in Biblical counseling, Biblical studies, or CGS programs, and the<br />
nationality of the students, American or otherwise. Of the 296 respondents, 161 women<br />
(54%) have been in or are currently participating in Spiritual Formation. The other 135<br />
respondents (46%) have not been in a Spiritual Formation group. Almost all of the<br />
respondents (281) indicated that they were American citizens (95%). Only fifteen women<br />
who responded to the survey were of a different nationality than American. Because of<br />
the small percentage of International students attending DTS, no correlations were run<br />
based on ethnithcity. However, their responses were valuable to the overall results.<br />
Results of the Struggles and Issues Faced by the Female Students<br />
The research question <strong>for</strong> this study asked, “What are the personal issues and<br />
needs of the <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary 21 st Century female students?” The fifty-nine<br />
question inventory in the descriptive survey revealed that the greatest struggle <strong>for</strong> DTS<br />
women seminarians is related to perfectionism (88%).<br />
Following this were comparison <strong>with</strong> other women (74%), stress (68%),<br />
relationships <strong>with</strong> male students (66%), singleness (58%), loneliness (55%), insecurity<br />
(54%), self-esteem (52%), self-confidence (49%), body image (44%), depression (35%),<br />
panic attacks (11%), and eating disorders (4%).
174 <br />
Related to demographics according to age, marital status, and degree<br />
programs, the survey revealed the following percentages of struggle <strong>with</strong> different<br />
personal issues:<br />
Single Women<br />
Married Women<br />
Perfectionism 84% Perfectionism 83%<br />
Difficulty w/Male Relationships 77% Comparison <strong>with</strong> Other Women 79%<br />
Loneliness 72% Difficulty Handling Stress 70%<br />
Comparison <strong>with</strong> Other Women 69% Difficulty w/Male Relationships 55%<br />
Difficulty Handling Stress 66% Personal Body Image 52%<br />
Insecurity 61% Low Self-Confidence 51%<br />
Low Self-Esteem 61% Low Self-Esteem 43%<br />
Personal Body Image 59% Insecurity 42%<br />
Low Self-Confidence 51% Loneliness 38%<br />
Depression 44% Depression 28%<br />
Younger Women (20-29 years old) Older Women (30-70+ years old)<br />
Perfectionism 88% Perfectionism 79%<br />
Difficulty w/Male Relationships 73% Difficulty Handling Stress 67%<br />
Comparison <strong>with</strong> Other Women 70% Comparison <strong>with</strong> Other Women 67%<br />
Difficulty Handling Stress 70% Difficulty w/Male Relationships 59%<br />
Loneliness 68% Insecurity 52%<br />
Insecurity 62% Discontentment <strong>with</strong> Singleness 52%<br />
Discontentment <strong>with</strong> Singleness 62% Personal Body Image 51%<br />
Low Self-Esteem 61% Low Self-Confidence 46%<br />
Personal Body Image 60% Low Self-Esteem 44%<br />
Low Self-Confidence 57% Loneliness 43%<br />
Depression 38% Depression 33%<br />
Th.M. Women<br />
M.A. Women<br />
Perfectionism 77% Perfectionism 86%<br />
Difficulty Handling Stress 63% Comparison <strong>with</strong> Other Women 78%<br />
Difficulty w/Male Relationships 63% Difficulty Handling Stress 70%<br />
Discontentment <strong>with</strong> Singleness 54% Difficulty w/Male Relationships 67%<br />
Comparison <strong>with</strong> Other Women 53% Discontentment <strong>with</strong> Singleness 61%<br />
Personal Body Image 42% Personal Body Image 59%<br />
Loneliness 44% Loneliness 50%<br />
Insecurity 41% Low Self-Confidence 49%<br />
Low Self-Confidence 30% Insecurity 44%<br />
The greatest needs of the female seminarians proved to be in the areas of having an older<br />
Christian woman as a mentor, wanting a meaningful relationship <strong>with</strong> faculty or staff of
175 <br />
DTS and the need <strong>for</strong> a close friend. The women students want to meet and <strong>for</strong>m<br />
friendships <strong>with</strong> the wives of DTS male students, they desire to have someone to be<br />
accountable to, they see the need to have returning women students connect <strong>with</strong> <strong>new</strong><br />
students, they face at times overwhelming financial needs, and they need more personal<br />
and relational connections <strong>with</strong> other female DTS students.<br />
Many of the respondents listed other needs and concerns that they have that<br />
they felt were not covered on the survey. This list of comments can be found on pages<br />
170-171 of this dissertation.The survey data was also cross-tabulated according to age,<br />
marital status and degree programs. The cross-tabulations are presented in Chapter 4.<br />
In addition, Chapter 4 presents the data gathered from the survey of the<br />
female DTS students. Chapter 5 discusses the data as it relates to each hypothesis, draws<br />
conclusions from the results of the research, suggests and recommends ways to address<br />
and meet the needs and issues of the DTS women students, and gives recommendations<br />
<strong>for</strong> future research. The ultimate purpose of this project is to identify and develop ways<br />
to most effectively address the personal needs of the women students at <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary<br />
so that they can receive the best possible preparation <strong>for</strong> a life of Christian ministry.
CHAPTER 5<br />
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS<br />
Summary of the Problem, Methodology, and Results<br />
The intention and purpose of this study was to surface the specific personal<br />
needs and issues <strong>with</strong> which Twenty-First Century female seminarians struggle. The<br />
primary tool designed <strong>for</strong> this study was a confidential, detailed, descriptive survey sent<br />
to each current female student at <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary (DTS) enrolled in the<br />
spring semester of 2008 to gain their personal responses and input. The results of the<br />
survey would help the <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary staff and faculty be better in<strong>for</strong>med of the<br />
personal struggles, needs, and issues of the women students. Resources, programming,<br />
care, and relationships could then be provided to best minister to the women students<br />
while they attend DTS. In turn, the female students would be better prepared relationally,<br />
emotionally, spiritually, physically, and psychologically to serve in Christian ministry.<br />
The data was recorded, analyzed and interpreted in order to both in<strong>for</strong>m and make<br />
recommendations to the DTS faculty and staff, Counseling Services, Student Services,<br />
and the Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students, which could assist in strengthening women<br />
according to the Seminary goal of preparing godly servant-leaders <strong>for</strong> a lifetime of<br />
Christian service.<br />
The Problem<br />
For its first fifty years, <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary focused only on the<br />
preparation of men <strong>for</strong> Christian ministry. Women were first accepted into <strong>Dallas</strong><br />
Seminary in 1975. Research indicates that men and women are different in numerous<br />
ways and have unique personal needs and issues. <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary seeks to effectively<br />
prepare both men and women <strong>for</strong> Christian service. As the number of women students<br />
176
177 <br />
increased over the years, the leadership of DTS recognized the change in the student<br />
population and eventually created a part-time position, the Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students.<br />
She was hired specifically to support, train, encourage, mentor, counsel, and create<br />
programs which address the issues and needs of the women students. This D.Min. study<br />
is the first of its kind to seek to identify and to evaluate the unique and specific personal<br />
needs, issues, and struggles of the women attending <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary.<br />
Methodology<br />
This study was based on a descriptive survey (Appendix B) of the female<br />
students enrolled at <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary in the spring 2008 semester to identify the specific<br />
personal needs and issues they struggle or deal <strong>with</strong> as women seminarians. The research<br />
question <strong>for</strong> this study asked, “What are the personal issues and needs of the <strong>Dallas</strong><br />
Theological Seminary Twenty-first Century female students?” The survey was mailed to<br />
each woman student and included a detailed, fifty-nine question inventory used to<br />
discover the women students’ personal needs and issues and to ascertain the degree to<br />
which they struggle personally in these areas. The DTS Office of the Registrar provided<br />
the original list and mailing labels. A total of 567 women students received surveys in<br />
January 2008 and 296 valid surveys were returned by March 1, 2008. An analysis of the<br />
data in<strong>for</strong>med the writing of this dissertation.<br />
Overall Results<br />
Demographic Summary<br />
The response to the survey reflects the personal needs and issues of 52% of<br />
the female students attending DTS in the spring of 2008. These 296 respondents represent<br />
a broad age range from 20 to over 70 <strong>with</strong> the majority of the women currently in their<br />
20s to 40s (80%). The remaining 20% of respondents represent women students 50 or<br />
older. The single largest group of respondents fall into the 20-29 age range (47%). The<br />
respondents also have an almost equal representation of those who are single (49%) and
178 <br />
those who are married (51%). The largest number of respondents (213) classify<br />
themselves as M.A. students (72%), and <strong>for</strong>ty-three women respondents (15%) report<br />
being in the Th.M. degree program. The remaining 13% indicated enrolled the CGS or<br />
doctoral programs.<br />
There is an almost equal distribution of 112 younger women (ages 20-29) in<br />
the M.A. degree program and 101 older women (ages 30+) also in the M.A. degree<br />
program. The number of younger women students in the Th.M. degree program (21) is<br />
also evenly distributed <strong>with</strong> the number of older women students in the Th.M. degree<br />
program (22) even though there are fewer women in Th.M. overall. This close<br />
distribution in age, marital status, and in the two main degree programs allows the<br />
answers to the survey questions to accurately represent the over-all representation of the<br />
female students attending DTS. There is a wider distribution when considering the<br />
number of full-time women students (36%) versus part-time women students (64%).<br />
Regarding participation in the Spiritual Formation (SF) small group program,<br />
54% of the respondents either are or have been in an SF group. The final demographic<br />
question sought to discover the number of international respondents. Only fifteen women<br />
or 5% of the total respondents indicated they were not American citizens.<br />
Results Related to Research Question<br />
This study asked and answered the research question, “What are the personal<br />
needs and issues of the <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary Twenty-first Century female<br />
students?” The DTS women student survey included sixty-five fixed choice questions<br />
and three open response questions that answered the research question. The results of the<br />
survey (Section B) revealed that the most frequent personal issues <strong>with</strong> which the women<br />
students struggle to some degree are:
179 <br />
Time Management (singles) 85%<br />
Time Management (marrieds) 80%<br />
Perfectionism 78%<br />
Comparison <strong>with</strong> other women 74%<br />
Stress 68%<br />
Friendships <strong>with</strong> men 66%<br />
Discontent <strong>with</strong> singleness 58%<br />
Anxiety/Fear 56%<br />
Relationships <strong>with</strong> married women 56%<br />
Loneliness 55%<br />
Insecurity 54%<br />
Low self-esteem 52%<br />
Low self-confidence 49%<br />
Body image 44%<br />
Relationships <strong>with</strong> single women 43%<br />
Depression 35%<br />
Not Satisfied <strong>with</strong> DTS friendships 25%<br />
Doubts <strong>with</strong> faith and beliefs 20%<br />
When only taking into consideration the women who indicated a high degree<br />
of struggle <strong>with</strong> these issues, the order changed somewhat and is as follows:<br />
Time Management (marrieds) 46%<br />
Time Management (singles) 42%<br />
Friendships <strong>with</strong> men 32%<br />
Comparison <strong>with</strong> other women 26%<br />
Perfectionism 22%<br />
Loneliness 17%<br />
Insecurity 15%<br />
Stress 15%<br />
Discontent <strong>with</strong> singleness 15%<br />
Anxiety/Fear 14%<br />
Low self-esteem 12%<br />
Relationships <strong>with</strong> married women 11%<br />
Relationships <strong>with</strong> single women 11%<br />
Depression 9%<br />
Low self-confidence 8%<br />
Doubts <strong>with</strong> faith and beliefs 4%<br />
Body image 3%<br />
Section C of the survey sought to discover specific needs of the women<br />
students. Almost half (42%) of the DTS women desire to have an older or more<br />
experienced Christian woman as a mentor. Even more of them expressed an interest in
180 <br />
having a peer mentor (63%). One student echoes the need of many DTS women: “I’d just<br />
like to know more about what it means to be a woman in this day and age. Society tells<br />
me to pursue my dreams. The church tells me I’m semi-important (more so as a wife and<br />
mother). Where’s the truth between the two extremes in light of today’s culture?”<br />
Another student added, “I don’t need an older mentor. I need someone more experienced<br />
in ministry.”<br />
In addition, a high number women (50% or more) indicated needs in the area<br />
of accountability, connection <strong>for</strong> <strong>new</strong> students <strong>with</strong> returning students, development of<br />
relationships <strong>with</strong> other female students, and financial concerns. One student shared,<br />
“Finances has been one of the biggest challenges <strong>for</strong> our family. My children have had to<br />
sacrifice <strong>for</strong> my education. That has caused questioning, fear, and doubt on my part.”<br />
Almost half of the single women (47%) revealed a strong desire <strong>for</strong> marriage<br />
along <strong>with</strong> the need <strong>for</strong> help in the area of dating skills. Older single women also<br />
indicated that their unique needs were not adequately addressed at DTS. One explained,<br />
“I am an older single student. Most people simply don’t know how to address the needs<br />
of a mature student. There are no groups to support us whether single or married.”<br />
Another added, “The older students aren’t very well integrated into the student body---<br />
understandably so, but I still feel pretty ancient. I wish the atmosphere were a bit more<br />
inclusive.” Detailed data on all the needs of the women students can be found in Figure 4.<br />
In addition, 44% of the respondents listed various family issues that are<br />
disruptive to their academic work (See page 139). One woman stated: “I am a single<br />
student who is solely responsible <strong>for</strong> caring <strong>for</strong> my elderly relative <strong>with</strong> dementia and<br />
depression. It’s overwhelming at times.” Another said, “My relationship <strong>with</strong> my mom is<br />
rocky and every now and then things will ‘hit the fan’ and need a lot of time and<br />
emotional energy. My brother has made a lot of unwise decisions in the past and that has<br />
required a lot of time ‘fighting fires’ in the family.” And one final comment summarizes
181 <br />
the situation <strong>for</strong> many women students: “Husband is in and out of a job; supporting<br />
parents financially and working full time and married life and serving <strong>with</strong> the local<br />
church.” Numerous students gave comments on the family issues that complicate their<br />
ability to give adequate attention to their academic studies and involvement in seminary<br />
life.<br />
The final part of the survey sought input from the women students regarding<br />
what types of programs, seminars, and speakers might be most helpful to the students.<br />
Figure 2, page 142 shows a significant number of women who see a need <strong>for</strong> ways to<br />
create mentoring opportunities <strong>with</strong> other Christian women, connect <strong>with</strong> female faculty<br />
and staff, and develop close friendships <strong>with</strong> other women students. As one student<br />
shared, “I think it would be great to have a personal mentor/Titus 2 woman to ‘counsel’<br />
and offer advice, guidance <strong>for</strong> regular day-to-day stuff.” Another student offered these<br />
words of praise, “I’ve been greatly encouraged by getting to know some of my DTS profs<br />
so far.”<br />
In addition, when the women students were asked to respond to a list of<br />
possible program/speaker topics (Figure 3, page 143), their highest interests in ranked<br />
order were:<br />
Time Management<br />
Marriage<br />
Healthy Body Image<br />
Depression<br />
Grief<br />
When asked <strong>for</strong> additional program/speaker topics, some of the top suggestions were:<br />
Singleness<br />
Women in ministry<br />
Stress management<br />
Anxiety/fear<br />
Finances<br />
Ministry opportunities <strong>for</strong> women.
182 <br />
See page 143-144 <strong>for</strong> a complete list of suggested program/speaker topics.<br />
The final question on the survey offered the respondents the opportunity to indicate any<br />
other needs they face or personal struggles they have which were not included on the<br />
survey. A complete list of these responses from ninety-eight of the women can be found<br />
on pages 170-171.<br />
Results Related to the Hypotheses<br />
First Hypothesis<br />
The first hypothesis stated that the needs and issues would differ <strong>for</strong> the DTS<br />
female students based on the demographic factors of younger and older, of single and<br />
married students, of international and non-international students, and of Th.M. and M.A.<br />
students. This anticipated response was noted throughout the study based on the data<br />
obtained from the respondents <strong>with</strong> one exception. This exception was in the area of the<br />
International female students at DTS and no correlations were run due to the small<br />
percentage of these respondents. One area of struggle <strong>with</strong> time management was not<br />
anticipated in the hypotheses as one of the top issues that the female students would have<br />
a struggle. All categories of female students indicated an almost equal struggle in this<br />
area of time management.<br />
Differences based on age, marital status, and degree programs surfaced in<br />
seven out of ten issues proving the validity of this hypothesis. The ten issues that were<br />
compared based on demographics were: perfectionism, loneliness, discontentment <strong>with</strong><br />
singleness, insecurity, low self-esteem, comparison <strong>with</strong> other women, depression, and<br />
low self-confidence, self-image (personal body image), and stress. Seven issues identified<br />
that vary according to demographics were:<br />
Comparison <strong>with</strong> other women<br />
Depression<br />
Insecurity<br />
Loneliness
183 <br />
Low self-esteem<br />
Self-confidence<br />
Singleness<br />
Little or no demographic differences were seen related to perfectionism, personal body<br />
image, and handling stress.<br />
Singleness issues surfaced in many of the women students’ written comments,<br />
such as, “Singleness---IT GETS OVERLOOKED. Everyone talks about how to have a<br />
healthy marriage/apply Scripture to marriage. No one talks about how to be a healthy<br />
single. 50% of US adults are single.” Or, “Many professors assume all students are<br />
married. Their examples in lecture refer to ‘your spouse’ and ‘spending time <strong>with</strong><br />
family.’ The reality is that there’s an overwhelming number of single women in full-time<br />
ministry (including church staffs) these days …We continue to seek to serve God <strong>with</strong>out<br />
the support of a spouse or family. I only wish we had more acknowledgement and<br />
support from DTS. I want to be married, but what if that never happens?” Being single<br />
continues to be a great challenge <strong>for</strong> many of the female students.<br />
Second Hypothesis<br />
Hypothesis Two made the assertion that the DTS female students’ greatest<br />
personal issues would be in the areas of perfectionism, stress and anxiety, loneliness, and<br />
depression. The data supported that perfectionism, loneliness and stress and anxiety were<br />
<strong>with</strong>in the top four struggles <strong>for</strong> the women students, but depression ranked tenth on the<br />
list so it is not as significant an issue as anticipated. One student gave the example, “Just<br />
the anxiety and stress I feel to keep my family (mostly parents and in-laws) happy and<br />
spend enough time <strong>with</strong> them.” Another shared, “I have young children and I work fulltime.<br />
I need more time to be able to do everything that I have to do.” And one other<br />
represented the feelings of many women students when she wrote, “Mainly time<br />
constraints---work, family, ministry and attending DTS simultaneously can be stressful!”
184 <br />
Perfectionism<br />
The struggle <strong>with</strong> perfectionism proved to be overall the number one problem<br />
<strong>for</strong> the women students and is seen <strong>with</strong> the following percentages surfacing: 84% of the<br />
single women students, 83% of the married women students, 88% of the younger women<br />
students, 79% of the older women students, 86% of the women in the M.A. degree<br />
program, and 77% of the women students in the Th.M. degree program. It is quite<br />
apparent that the vast number of DTS female students deal <strong>with</strong> some degree of<br />
perfectionistic tendencies.<br />
Loneliness<br />
The subject of loneliness ranked second on the list of significant struggles <strong>for</strong><br />
the women students and also surfaced as an area in which all the demographic groups had<br />
some degree of challenge. Loneliness can express itself in several other issues such as<br />
depression (see below), sexual habits, alcohol usage, low self-esteem, poor self-image,<br />
and lack of confidence. The single women (72%) were the highest percentage group that<br />
struggles <strong>with</strong> loneliness. The married women students (38%) less significantly struggle<br />
<strong>with</strong> loneliness. This would be predictable since they have a husband <strong>for</strong> a companion.<br />
The younger women (68%) indicated more struggle <strong>with</strong> loneliness than the older women<br />
students (43%). This represents a 25% gap based on age. The difference based on marital<br />
status related to the struggle <strong>with</strong> loneliness is greater <strong>with</strong> a 34% gap. Interestingly, the<br />
statistics show an almost exact percentage of M.A. students (50%) as Th.M. students<br />
reporting that loneliness is a problem <strong>for</strong> them. As one student shared, “I could use a<br />
friend at seminary <strong>with</strong> whom I could share deeply.”<br />
The statistics on loneliness are high and the issues of needing a close friend,<br />
someone to be accountable to, and having peer and/or an older Christian woman as a<br />
mentor could be strong and viable options to address the loneliness problem <strong>for</strong> the<br />
female students. In addition, the Spiritual Formation small groups program is an excellent
185 <br />
way to help students develop close relationships. A number of survey respondents spoke<br />
highly of their experience <strong>with</strong> their small group of women. One woman said that “her SF<br />
group has made it easier” to have close friends. Another shared, “I think there is a need to<br />
help women understand their past experiences and deal <strong>with</strong> the painful ones. SF really<br />
helped me in this area.” And a third student wrote, “My SF group is AMAZING! If I<br />
didn’t have those women, I would struggle more <strong>with</strong> life right now.”<br />
Stress and Anxiety<br />
Stress and anxiety fell fourth in frequency on the list of struggles <strong>for</strong> the<br />
female students. Related to this are other issues such as fear, panic attacks, balance and<br />
time management. The challenge of handling stress and anxiety didn’t indicate much<br />
difference based on demographics. Those in the two age categories, younger and older,<br />
indicated similar difficulty dealing <strong>with</strong> stress. The younger female students (70%)<br />
indicated slightly higher difficulty handling stress than the older female students (67%).<br />
The single students (66%) indicated having difficulty handling stress and 71% of the<br />
married female students also indicated a high degree of difficulty handling stress, while<br />
70% of M.A. students and 63% of Th.M. students reported issues related to stress and<br />
anxiety.<br />
Stress and anxiety often bring on panic attacks <strong>for</strong> some individuals. This is<br />
no different <strong>for</strong> the DTS female seminarians. Only 11% of the women students indicated<br />
some level of panic attacks, another 26% reported that it “rarely” was a problem<br />
indicating that they may struggle <strong>with</strong> the issue from time to time. Fortunately, over half<br />
of the female respondents (64%) do not ever struggle <strong>with</strong> the debilitating issue of panic<br />
attacks associated <strong>with</strong> stress and anxiety. A contributing factor to the stress and anxiety<br />
levels experienced by the female students could be the difficulty they experience trying to<br />
balance their personal and/or married life <strong>with</strong> family, employment, and academia and its<br />
requirements. Over three-fourths of the female students in both the single status (85%)
186 <br />
and the married status (80%) indicated that balancing their time and responsibilities was a<br />
huge challenge and struggle <strong>for</strong> them. Many comments on the survey reflected the<br />
difficulty the women have in balancing the different aspects of their lives. One woman<br />
reflects the frustration of many of the students when she stated, “I have a level of<br />
overwhelmedness that I cannot describe trying to balance seminary life, work and family-<br />
--not to mention ministry and meeting <strong>with</strong> and counseling women. I am not sure what<br />
can be done about this---attending one more in<strong>for</strong>mative seminar on stress might help but<br />
it just adds to the calendar.”<br />
Depression<br />
Depression is not a significant struggle, <strong>for</strong>tunately, <strong>for</strong> 65% of the female<br />
respondents (see Table 12). However, <strong>for</strong> the other 35% of the female students who do<br />
experience some degree of struggle <strong>with</strong> depression, it can be a very disruptive, troubling,<br />
and frightening issue. Depression can be brought on because of a number of contributing<br />
factors. The data from this study indicates different levels of challenge <strong>for</strong> women<br />
students in the areas of loneliness, low self-esteem and poor self-image, perfectionism,<br />
low self-confidence, comparison, difficulty handling stress, discontentment <strong>with</strong><br />
singleness, and the need <strong>for</strong> accountability, close and meaningful relationships, and<br />
mentors. Many of these issues can easily contribute to bouts of depression. Of course<br />
psychological, clinical, and emotional disorders that lead to depression are serious and<br />
need to be treated, but these are beyond the scope of this study and its recommendations.<br />
Third Hypothesis<br />
The third hypothesis claimed that the DTS female students would have a<br />
struggle <strong>with</strong> the issues of self-image, self-acceptance, and self-confidence.<br />
The data supported this hypothesis. The survey gathered in<strong>for</strong>mation regarding selfimage,<br />
self-acceptance, and self-confidence through a multiple number of questions on
187 <br />
related topics including low self-esteem (B2), unhealthy personal body image (B5),<br />
struggles <strong>with</strong> bulimia or anorexia (B6), low self-confidence (B12), and insecurity (B22),<br />
comparison <strong>with</strong> other women (B23).<br />
The women students in general all have some degree of struggle <strong>with</strong> these<br />
issues. In considering the different demographics, the distributions were as follows:<br />
Single women:<br />
Comparison <strong>with</strong> other women – 69%<br />
Insecurity – 61%<br />
Low self-esteem – 61%<br />
Poor personal body image – 59%<br />
Low self-confidence – 51%<br />
Married women:<br />
Comparison <strong>with</strong> other women – 79%<br />
Low self-confidence – 51%<br />
Poor personal body image – 52%<br />
Low self-esteem – 43%<br />
Insecurity – 42%<br />
Younger women:<br />
Comparison <strong>with</strong> other women – 70%<br />
Low self-esteem – 61%<br />
Insecurity – 62%<br />
Poor personal body image – 60%<br />
Low self-confidence – 57%<br />
Older women:<br />
Comparison to other women – 67%<br />
Insecurity – 52%<br />
Poor personal body image – 51%<br />
Low self-confidence – 46%<br />
Low self-esteem – 44%<br />
Fourth Hypothesis<br />
The fourth hypothesis made the assertion that the DTS female students would<br />
indicate a strong desire and need <strong>for</strong> mentoring relationships <strong>with</strong> older, more spiritually<br />
mature Christian women. This was, in fact, the case. A total of 207 women students<br />
(70%) reported that in the past they had had an older Christian woman as a mentor <strong>with</strong>
188 <br />
whom they could regularly talk. Only 142 of the 296 respondents (48%) indicated that<br />
they currently have such a relationship. Of the 296 respondents, 223 (75%) indicated that<br />
they would like to have an older Christian woman as a mentor. The data from the survey<br />
indicates that a high number of women students would like to have a female mentor.<br />
Fifth Hypothesis<br />
The fifth and final hypothesis predicted that the DTS female students would<br />
reveal that one of their greatest needs was to have close meaningful relationships <strong>with</strong><br />
men and women. The survey confirmed this hypothesis. Though the women would like to<br />
have these relationships, only 98 female students (33%) out of 296 indicated that they<br />
never or rarely had difficulty developing meaningful friendships <strong>with</strong> the DTS male<br />
students. The other 63% indicated that it was a problem. The women students also<br />
indicated that out of the 296 who responded to the survey 236 (79%) would like to have a<br />
close friend(s) to spend time <strong>with</strong> regularly. As one woman wrote, “There is a need <strong>for</strong> a<br />
feeling of community, particularly <strong>with</strong> other female students. Perhaps a group lunch<br />
once a month---including female faculty/staff members---would help. Coming back to<br />
campus at night can be a hindrance.” The desire <strong>for</strong> the meaningful relationships <strong>with</strong><br />
both men and women exists and needs to be addressed.<br />
Research Conclusions and Recommendations<br />
According to the survey results, time management, expectations of self,<br />
various emotional issues, and lack of significant relationships surfaced as the greatest<br />
challenges <strong>for</strong> the seminary women. The data from the study is consistent <strong>with</strong> the<br />
interviews and appointments that the researcher, Lynn Etta Manning, currently the<br />
Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students, conducts on a regular basis <strong>with</strong> the women students.<br />
Based on the data collected from 52% of the female students at DTS, the following<br />
recommendations are made to help address the needs and issues of the women students:
189 <br />
1. Evaluate the current SNAP program based on the survey date to better<br />
accommodate and meet the personal needs of the <strong>new</strong> incoming female<br />
students each semester. (The letters in the name “SNAP” do not stand <strong>for</strong><br />
anything. The name SNAP was chosen to reflect the idea of “connecting”<br />
women like the actual item often found on clothing apparel.) SNAP is a<br />
Women Students’ Fellowship student ministry designed <strong>for</strong> entering<br />
female students. A returning DTS woman student is assigned to an<br />
entering female student and the <strong>new</strong> student is contacted by the SNAP<br />
partner prior to her arriving <strong>for</strong> orientation and then throughout the first<br />
semester as needed. The SNAP partner is an initial contact, friend, and<br />
resource <strong>for</strong> the entering student so she can get acquainted <strong>with</strong> other DTS<br />
women, oriented to DTS and <strong>Dallas</strong>. The SNAP program is designed to<br />
help the <strong>new</strong> students feel less alone and overwhelmed upon entering<br />
seminary.<br />
2. Evaluate and make suggestions based on the survey results to strengthen<br />
the existing Hesed Sister peer mentoring program of WSF. Expand this<br />
program based on the high interest that DTS women students have <strong>for</strong> a<br />
peer mentor and apply <strong>for</strong> additional funding to conduct these programs.<br />
3. Continue to identify and select women students to serve on the leadership<br />
team of the Women Students’ Fellowship (WSF) in order to offer<br />
experience and training in the area of ministry to women and to help carry<br />
out the programs to address the needs of women students.<br />
4. Conduct a study of perfectionism and its causes to discover effective ways<br />
to help female seminarians address their perfectionistic tendencies.<br />
5. Schedule seminars, brown bag lunch meetings, retreats, and other ways to<br />
address the topics of interest indicated by the female women students.
190 <br />
6. Continue to require all incoming women students to have an entrance<br />
interview <strong>with</strong> the Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women students so that the students will be<br />
aware of the commitment the seminary has to identify and address their<br />
personal needs.<br />
7. Create ways <strong>for</strong> the women students to connect <strong>with</strong> and develop<br />
relationships <strong>with</strong> the DTS female faculty and staff.<br />
8. Encourage incoming women students who are not required to take<br />
Spiritual Formation to consider joining a group in order to connect <strong>with</strong> a<br />
group of fellow seminarians and gain the support and encouragement<br />
found in experiencing Christian growth in the context of community.<br />
9. Create a webpage (e.g. Facebook) <strong>for</strong> the purpose of connecting the<br />
Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students <strong>with</strong> the DTS female students. Daily<br />
devotionals and prayer, in<strong>for</strong>mation on the issues <strong>with</strong> which the female<br />
students struggle could be posted, and opportunities <strong>for</strong> discussion and<br />
questions could be posted. Follow-up through personal appointments<br />
could be offered and any further resources or counseling could be<br />
available when necessary.<br />
10. Adapt the survey used in this study to discover the issues and needs of<br />
women in the local church and suggest ways <strong>for</strong> the female leadership in a<br />
church to carry out the Titus 2 mandate <strong>for</strong> spiritually mature women to<br />
teach and train younger women.<br />
In order <strong>for</strong> the Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students to most successfully accomplish<br />
all the recommendations listed above, as well as fulfill her current job responsibilities, the<br />
following two proposals should be strongly considered:<br />
• Make the Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students a full-time salaried position<br />
(instead of part-time) in order to most effectively and consistently meet
191 <br />
the needs of the women students who comprise an increasing one-fourth to<br />
one-third of the DTS student enrollment.<br />
• Change the title of Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students to Dean of Women in<br />
order to reflect the authority and responsibility given to this unique and<br />
essential role and to minimize the confusion <strong>with</strong> the role of faculty as<br />
academic advisors. The Dean of Women would serve as a colleague under<br />
the authority of the Dean of Students.<br />
Recommendations <strong>for</strong> Further Research<br />
The following recommendations <strong>for</strong> further research have developed as a<br />
result of this study:<br />
1. Develop an adaptation of the survey and its applications to be used in a<br />
local church setting to assess and evaluate the needs and issues of the<br />
women in the local church.<br />
2. Conduct a similar study of the needs and issues of female DTS students<br />
ten years after this study (2018).<br />
3. Encourage a study of similar needs and issues of women students at other<br />
seminaries.<br />
4. Conduct a study of similar positions to DTS’s Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women<br />
Students at other seminaries <strong>for</strong> the responsibilities, salary, and other<br />
compensations.<br />
5. Recommend a similar study to be done of the male DTS students.<br />
Implications of These Findings<br />
This study raised the question of what the personal issues and needs of the<br />
<strong>Dallas</strong> Theological female seminarians were and how the women could more holistically<br />
be ministered to, counseled, mentored, and trained in order to best prepare them as they
192 <br />
anticipate future ministry involvement. Prioritizing the unique needs of women<br />
seminarians cannot simply be a verbal assent to its importance, but also must be backed<br />
by the appropriate programs, program funding, personnel, and visibility. It must also<br />
include better interfacing between the faculty, Dean of Students, the Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women<br />
Students, and various academic departments of DTS.<br />
The Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students holds the responsibility of oversight of all<br />
the enrolled women students. Her position includes offering the women encouragement,<br />
pastoral care, personal advising and lay counseling, mentoring, help in adjustment to<br />
seminary and academia, training in leadership, accommodating internships, and<br />
addressing crises and specific problems and needs that arise that are specifically unique<br />
to women seminarians. The Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women is also responsible <strong>for</strong> overseeing the<br />
Women Students’ Fellowship (WSF) and its Leadership Team which provides leadership<br />
opportunities and development, special events, and programming <strong>for</strong> the women students.<br />
The Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women selects, trains and mentors women students to serve other DTS<br />
women students as peer mentors as part of the Hesed Sister ministry. The Advisor <strong>for</strong><br />
Women Students also oversees an intern who serves on the WSF Leadership Team and<br />
assists <strong>with</strong> the training and management of the Hesed Sisters. As such, should this<br />
position be re-considered <strong>for</strong> full-time status due to the many needs and issues of the<br />
women students and due to the increasing number of women attending <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary?<br />
Concurrent to the period of doing the research and writing of this dissertation,<br />
the Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students launched two specific programs in WSF in anticipation<br />
of the results of this study: the SNAP program and the Hesed Sister program. The SNAP<br />
program was instituted to meet the needs of the incoming female students by connecting<br />
a returning woman student <strong>with</strong> an entering woman student. It has as its goal to help <strong>new</strong><br />
students get acquainted <strong>with</strong> the DTS campus, other women of DTS, and to acclimate<br />
them to <strong>Dallas</strong> and some of the city’s resources such as local grocery stores, hairdressers,
193 <br />
churches, common popular retail outlets, etc. The purpose of The Hesed Sisters is to<br />
provide suitable, trained peer-mentors <strong>for</strong> those students seeking a deeper relationship of<br />
authenticity, accountability, and encouragement in addition to or in place of professional<br />
counselors, staff, and faculty who may not always be available. The results of this study<br />
verify the need to continue and strengthen the SNAP and Hesed Sister programs to<br />
address the personal needs of the women students.<br />
The Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Student’s role includes meeting <strong>with</strong> continuing<br />
female students <strong>for</strong> mentoring, lay counseling, advising, and pastoral care. These students<br />
seek appointments because of the desire <strong>for</strong> mentoring by an older Christian woman who<br />
understands women, seminary, the Christian life, challenges of marriage and singleness<br />
and other issues as disclosed in this study. The counselors and counseling department of<br />
DTS often refer female students to the Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students <strong>for</strong> follow-up care<br />
and counseling when they have determined that clinical or psychological counseling is<br />
inappropriate <strong>for</strong> a specific individual. The data from this study will help to more easily<br />
identify the personal issues of women students and find the best ways to give help and<br />
support.<br />
Women Students’ Fellowship is an in<strong>for</strong>mal educational and service program<br />
led by women students chosen annually by the Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students. The<br />
Leadership Team, under the supervision of the Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students, plans and<br />
executes various extra-curricular seminars, socials, lunchtime speakers, student chapels,<br />
programs <strong>for</strong> ministry exposure, orientation luncheons <strong>for</strong> <strong>new</strong> women students, retreats,<br />
relationship building events, and various other activities to benefit the women students.<br />
This student organization offers leadership training and experience <strong>for</strong> the women<br />
students while at <strong>Dallas</strong> Seminary. The women on the Leadership Team are individually<br />
and regularly mentored and counseled by the Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students. This study<br />
reaffirms the value of this WSF Leadership Team to develop women and their gifts and
194 <br />
include them in offering an effective program to meet the needs of the female students at<br />
DTS.<br />
The needs and issues of women students revealed by this study will always<br />
exist. The resources and time that the students have available to seek help <strong>with</strong> these<br />
issues are often very limited. However, the need to address these issues and concerns<br />
remains imperative if DTS intends to fulfill its mission to prepare both men and women<br />
<strong>for</strong> Christian service. The study revealed that the women students desire relationships that<br />
will help and support them as they face the personal issues and struggles that are part if<br />
their seminary experience. The challenge remains to find and equip those Christian<br />
women who are mature enough and have the time to engage <strong>with</strong> and invest in the lives<br />
of the seminary students.<br />
The greatest command to all Christians is to love the Lord and then to love<br />
one another. It behooves Christians to respond to this mandate to love one another and to<br />
reach out in ways that can help others. This stands particularly relevant <strong>for</strong> a seminary<br />
which makes as its goal to train men and women <strong>for</strong> Christian ministry. In an age that is<br />
disjointed, disillusioned, distrustful, and disconnected relationally by time and<br />
availability, the need <strong>for</strong> intentional relationship building and the sharing of experience<br />
and wisdom is critical. May God help us to fulfill his command to love one another and<br />
to do it well especially <strong>with</strong> the women who are coming to seminary <strong>for</strong> training in<br />
excellence, academically and personally, so that they might be able to go out into the<br />
world and minister more effectively.
APPENDIX A<br />
PILOT STUDY COVER LETTER<br />
Dec. 10, 2007<br />
Dear ____________,<br />
Enclosed you will find a copy of the proposed, confidential survey that I plan to send out<br />
in January 2008 to all the current female DTS students, as part of my DMin project. The<br />
data from the official survey in January 2008 will be collected and evaluated in order to<br />
try to more effectively meet the needs and address the issues of the DTS female students.<br />
I would like to ask you to be a part of the pilot survey process and have you take the<br />
survey confidentially and then to give me your feedback. You will not answer the survey<br />
questions on the survey but may want to do so on a separate sheet of paper <strong>for</strong> your own<br />
personal in<strong>for</strong>mation. Then the survey can be kept totally confidential.<br />
I am interested in finding out two major things from you:<br />
1. How long does it take <strong>for</strong> you to complete the survey? Time yourself and<br />
give me the time it took to complete the survey in one uninterrupted sitting.<br />
2. Give me feedback (you can write on the survey) regarding the survey and the<br />
effectiveness of the questions, indicating any questions that are not worded<br />
clearly, or any questions that seem repetitive. Also include in your feedback<br />
any questions that need to be asked that have not presently been included on<br />
the survey.<br />
The more feedback that you can give me will help me to more finely tune the survey so<br />
that it will be the most effective and give the most accurate in<strong>for</strong>mation from the female<br />
students.<br />
Since I will be sending the official survey out in January 2008, I want to ask you to keep<br />
your participation in the pilot process and any in<strong>for</strong>mation about the survey completely<br />
confidential. Please do not discuss the survey or any of its questions or insights <strong>with</strong><br />
anyone else so that we can be sure that the validity of the survey is protected.<br />
Thanking you in advance <strong>for</strong> your participation and help by being in the pilot survey<br />
group. I am grateful <strong>for</strong> you. If you could set aside the time to take this survey and return<br />
it and this letter <strong>with</strong> your feedback and insights by Dec. 17, be<strong>for</strong>e you leave <strong>for</strong> the<br />
195
196 <br />
Christmas holidays, I would greatly appreciate it. Please return the survey and your<br />
feedback to me in the enclosed, self-addressed stamped envelope.<br />
Blessings to you and I pray that you have a safe and joy-filled Christmas <strong>with</strong> friends and<br />
loved ones.<br />
Serving you in Christ,<br />
Lynn Etta Manning<br />
Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students<br />
<strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary<br />
Name: ___________________________<br />
Approximate time it took to take the survey: ____________________
197 <br />
APPENDIX B<br />
DTS WOMEN STUDENTS’ SURVEY<br />
This survey is COMPLETELY CONFIDENTIAL AND ANONYMOUS and in NO WAY can it be<br />
TRACED back to any student. As the Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students, it is my desire that the faculty and<br />
staff of DTS more effectively and efficiently meet the needs of the female students. Without discovering<br />
what your personal needs and issues are, we cannot sufficiently minister to those needs. I pray <strong>for</strong> your<br />
honest and thoughtful responses on this survey.<br />
Please return your completed survey to the address listed on the last page by:<br />
February 15, 2008<br />
Thank you <strong>for</strong> taking the time to thoughtfully and honestly complete this survey.<br />
Lynn Etta Manning<br />
Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students<br />
3909 Swiss Avenue<br />
<strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary<br />
<strong>Dallas</strong>, TX 75204<br />
A. PERSONAL HISTORY AND DEMOGRAPHICS<br />
1. Current Age: (check one)<br />
____ 20 – 29<br />
____ 30 – 39<br />
____ 40 – 49<br />
____ 50 – 59<br />
____ 60 – 69<br />
____ 70 or above<br />
2. Current Marital Status: (check one)<br />
___ Single<br />
___ Married<br />
3. In which degree program or certificate program are you currently enrolled?<br />
____ Master of Theology (ThM)<br />
____ Master of Arts (MA)<br />
____ Certificate of Graduate Studies (CGS)<br />
____ Other _________________________<br />
4. Are you currently attending classes/taking courses on the <strong>Dallas</strong> Campus?<br />
_____Yes _____No<br />
5. What is your current student status? (FT = 12 hrs.; PT = Less than 12 hrs.)<br />
____ Full-Time Student<br />
____ Part-Time Student<br />
6. Are you or have you been in a Spiritual Formation group? ____Yes ____ No<br />
7. Are you an American citizen? ____ Yes _____No
198 <br />
B. PERSONAL ISSUES WITH WHICH YOU CURRENTLY STRUGGLE<br />
After each question or statement, please circle the number that best represents the degree <strong>with</strong><br />
which you struggle, or check Yes or No where indicated.<br />
1. I struggle <strong>with</strong> depression.<br />
1____ _ 2____ 3______ 4_____ _ 5____ __ 6_____ 7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
2. I struggle <strong>with</strong> low self-esteem.<br />
1____ 2_____ _ 3______ 4_____ _ 5____ __ 6_____ 7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
3. I struggle <strong>with</strong> perfectionism.<br />
1____ _ 2_____ _ 3______ 4_____ _ 5____ __ 6_____ 7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
4. I struggle <strong>with</strong> loneliness.<br />
1____ _ 2_____ _ 3______ 4_____ _ 5____ __ 6_____ 7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
5. I struggle <strong>with</strong> an unhealthy personal body image.<br />
1____ _ 2_____ _ 3______ 4_____ _ 5 ____ __ 6_____ 7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
6. I struggle <strong>with</strong> either bulimia or anorexia.<br />
1____ _ 2_____ 3______ 4_____ _ 5____ __ 6_____ 7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
7. I drink alcoholic beverages while attending DTS.<br />
1____ __2_____ __3_____ _4_____ _ 5____ ____6_____ _7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
8. As a married student, I struggle <strong>with</strong> balancing marriage, family, and the requirements of<br />
DTS.<br />
1________2_______ 3_______ _4______ 5______ _ 6_______ 7____N/A<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
9. Being single as a student, I struggle <strong>with</strong> balancing personal life, family, and the requirements<br />
of DTS.<br />
1_______ 2_______ 3_______ _4_______ 5______ _ 6_______ 7____N/A<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
10. I struggle <strong>with</strong> being faithful to my husband in my thought life<br />
1______ 2_______ 3________ 4______ 5_____ _ 6_____ _ 7_ _ N/A<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
11. I struggle <strong>with</strong> being faithful to my husband by my actions.<br />
1______ 2_______ 3_________4______ 5_____ _ 6_____ _ 7____N/A<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
12. I struggle <strong>with</strong> low self-confidence.<br />
1____ _ 2____ 3______ 4_____ _ 5____ __ 6_____ 7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always
199 <br />
13. I am discontent in my singleness.<br />
1_______ 2______ 3_______<br />
4_______ 5______ _ 6_______ 7___N/A<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
14. I am discontent in my marriage.<br />
1_______ 2______ _3_______ 4_______ 5_______ 6_______ 7___N/A<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Alway<br />
15. I struggle <strong>with</strong> having homosexual desires.<br />
1_______ 2_______ 3________ 4_______ 5____ __6_____ 7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
16. I struggle <strong>with</strong> sexual needs that I resolve <strong>with</strong> masturbation.<br />
1_______ 2_____ _ 3____ ___ 4______ _5__ ____6______ 7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
17. I use, view, or read pornography. _____ Yes _____No<br />
18. I struggle <strong>with</strong> doubts about my faith and beliefs.<br />
1_____ __2_______ 3________ 4_______ 5_______ 6____ ___7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
19. I have difficulty handling stress.<br />
1_____ __2_______ 3________ 4_______ 5_______6____ ___ 7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
20. I have difficulty handling anxiety/(fear).<br />
1_____ __2_______ 3________ 4_______ 5_______6____ ___ 7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
21. I have panic attacks.<br />
1________2_____ _ 3______ __4________5______ _6________ 7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
22. I struggle <strong>with</strong> feelings of insecurity.<br />
1_______ 2______ 3________ 4______ 5______ _6______ _ 7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
23. I struggle <strong>with</strong> comparing myself to other women.<br />
1_______ 2______ 3_______ 4______ 5_______ 6_____ _ 7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
24. I struggle <strong>with</strong> knowing how to communicate my intentions appropriately <strong>with</strong> the opposite<br />
sex.<br />
1_______ 2____ _ 3_____ ___4_______ 5_______ 6______ 7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
25. It is difficult to develop meaningful friendships <strong>with</strong> male students at DTS.<br />
1_______ 2____ __3_____ ___ 4________5______ _6______ _7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
26. It is difficult to develop meaningful friendships <strong>with</strong> married women students.<br />
1_______ 2____ __3_____ ___4_________5_______ 6_____ _7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always
200 <br />
27. It is difficult to develop meaningful friendships <strong>with</strong> single women students.<br />
1_______2_______ 3______ _ 4_________5_______ 6___ _____7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
28. I am currently satisfied <strong>with</strong> my support/friendship network. __Yes __No<br />
29. I am single and sexually active. ____ Yes ____ No<br />
30. I have been sexually abused. _____Yes ____ No<br />
31. I have been verbally and/or emotionally abused. _____Yes ____No<br />
32. I have been physically abused. ______ Yes ____No<br />
C. CURRENT PERSONAL NEEDS WHILE AT DTS<br />
After each question or statement, please check Yes or No, or circle the number that best<br />
represents your current need(s).<br />
1. In the past, I have had an older Christian woman to talk <strong>with</strong> regularly.__Yes __No<br />
2. Currently I have an older Christian woman to talk <strong>with</strong> regularly. __Yes __No<br />
3. If you answered NO to #2, would you like to have an older Christian woman to talk <strong>with</strong> on a<br />
regular basis? ___Yes ___No<br />
4. I have a peer who is a spiritual mentor <strong>with</strong> whom I spend time regularly. ___Yes ___No<br />
5. I would like to have a peer who would be a spiritual mentor <strong>for</strong> me <strong>with</strong> whom I could spend<br />
time on a regular basis. ___Yes ___ No<br />
6. I have financial needs that are overwhelming <strong>for</strong> me.<br />
1_______ 2____ __3_____ ___4_________5_______ 6_____ _7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
7. I have had an abortion in the past and still have painful emotions and thoughts that I need<br />
help to work through. ______Yes _____No _____N/A<br />
8. It is difficult <strong>for</strong> me to meet other women students.<br />
1_______2_______ 3_________4________ 5_____ __6____<br />
___7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
9. I have a close friend(s) to spend time <strong>with</strong> on a regular basis. __Yes __ No<br />
10. It is difficult to meet and <strong>for</strong>m friendships <strong>with</strong> the wives of the DTS male students.<br />
1_______2_______ 3_________4________ 5_____ _ 6____ ___7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always
201 <br />
11. I need more personal and relational connection <strong>with</strong> other female students at DTS.<br />
1______ 2_______ 3_________4________ 5_____ _ 6____ ___7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
12. As a <strong>new</strong> student, I needed someone to connect <strong>with</strong> me as a friend on campus so I would<br />
not have felt so alone, nervous, or disconnected.<br />
1______ 2_______ 3________ 4________ 5_____ _6____ ___ 7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
13. I need someone to be accountable to <strong>for</strong> my attitudes and actions.<br />
1_____ 2_______ 3_________4________ 5_____ _ 6____ ___ 7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
14. I need help <strong>with</strong> the do’s and don’ts of dating and healthy boundaries.<br />
1______2_______ _ 3________ 4________ 5______ 6____ ___<br />
7__ N/A<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
15. My desire to get married consumes my thought-life.<br />
1______2_______ _ 3________ 4________ 5______ 6____ ___<br />
7__N/A<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
16. I have family needs/issues that are disruptive to my academic work<br />
1_____ 2_______ _ 3_________ 4________ 5_____ _ 6____ ___7<br />
Never Rarely Somewhat Moderately Often Usually Always<br />
Those needs/issues are (be as general or specific as you feel com<strong>for</strong>table):<br />
______________________________________________________________________________<br />
______________________________________________________________________________<br />
______________________________________________________________________________<br />
D. Topics <strong>for</strong> Programming, Seminars, and Speakers at DTS<br />
In order to bring extra-curricular seminars, speakers, and opportunities to you <strong>for</strong> enrichment to<br />
your academic education, the following questions serve to determine your interests and needs.<br />
Please answer all subjects in which you have an interest:<br />
On a scale from 1 – 5 please answer the following questions using this rating:<br />
1=no need 2=some need 3=often a need 4=significant need 5=greatest need<br />
1. Since becoming a student at DTS, my non-academic needs have been to have:<br />
no need some often significant greatest need<br />
1 2 3 4 5<br />
a. a close friend ………………………………<br />
b. an older Christian woman as a mentor…
202 <br />
c. a meaningful relationship <strong>with</strong><br />
faculty or staff .........................................<br />
d. extra-curricular social activities<br />
on campus………………………………<br />
e. training in dating and social skills………<br />
f. seminars addressing common personal<br />
struggles….............................................<br />
g. an opportunity to get to know wives<br />
of male students…………………………<br />
2. I would like to have speakers on any of the following subjects:<br />
a. abortion………….<br />
b. depression…….....<br />
c. divorce……………<br />
d. eating disorders….<br />
e. homosexuality……<br />
f. marriage………….<br />
g. grief………………<br />
h. time management..<br />
i. healthy body image.<br />
(other suggestions): j. _________<br />
no need some often significant greatest need<br />
1 2 3 4 5<br />
E. Concluding Comments<br />
1. Are there any needs you have or struggles you face that were not covered on this<br />
survey? _______Yes ______ No<br />
2. If YES, what are those needs and/or struggles? Please list:___________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________<br />
_____________________________________________________________________<br />
Thank you <strong>for</strong> your participation in completing this survey. I appreciate your<br />
vulnerability and honesty and assure you that this survey is totally anonymous and<br />
confidential and cannot be traced back to any student who takes it.
203 <br />
Please return this completed survey by February 15, 2008 to:<br />
• If on the <strong>Dallas</strong> campus, put this survey in the enclosed envelope and place it in the<br />
DTS mail slot (by the Campus Post Office) labeled:<br />
“ DTS Women Students’ Survey”<br />
----OR----<br />
• If NOT attending classes ON the <strong>Dallas</strong> campus, please return the survey by U. S.<br />
Postal mail in the enclosed, pre-stamped envelope to:<br />
Lynn Etta Manning<br />
Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students<br />
3909 Swiss Avenue<br />
<strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary<br />
<strong>Dallas</strong>, TX 75204
204 <br />
APPENDIX C<br />
SURVEY COVER LETTER<br />
January 2008<br />
Dear DTS Women Students:<br />
Enclosed you will find a copy of a confidential survey that I have designed <strong>for</strong> my DMin degree<br />
to gather in<strong>for</strong>mation about the personal needs and issues of the 21 st Century female students. I<br />
will collect and evaluate the data from the survey to enable me and the DTS staff and faculty to<br />
more effectively meet the needs and address the issues of the DTS female students.<br />
I am asking you to be a part of this important study and <strong>for</strong> you to have an open heart and mind to<br />
answer the questions <strong>with</strong> total honesty and integrity. You are valuable to God, to DTS, and to me<br />
as a sister in Christ and I desire to provide the best possible ministry and programming that will<br />
most effectively equip you <strong>for</strong> a lifetime of Christian ministry.<br />
I would appreciate it if you would set aside 10 to 20 minutes of your time to take this survey and<br />
return it. Please return the survey to me in the enclosed, self-addressed envelope by February 15,<br />
2008. Thank you in advance <strong>for</strong> your participation in this important study. The more responses<br />
received, the greater opportunity I will have to provide the resources <strong>for</strong> our seminary women.<br />
Blessings to you and serving you in Christ,<br />
Lynn Etta Manning<br />
Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students<br />
<strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary
205 <br />
APPENDIX D<br />
SURVEY EXPENSES<br />
Based on 600 DTS women students:<br />
Total Mailing:<br />
400 Campus boxes<br />
25 International<br />
175 United States<br />
Postage:<br />
25 Overseas @ $0.97 ………………………………..$ 24.25<br />
25 Overseas @ $0.97 return postage ………………... 24.25<br />
175 @ $ 0.41 ………………………………………….. 71.75<br />
175 @ $ 0.41 return postage ………………………….. 71.75<br />
_________<br />
Total $192.00<br />
Envelopes:<br />
6 – 100 count 9x12 @ $6.99…………………………..$ 41.94<br />
2 – 500 count #10 White Return Envelopes @ $7.49…...14.98<br />
8.25% tax ………………………………………………....4.08<br />
________<br />
Total $ 61.00<br />
Labels:<br />
1 box mailing labels……………………………………..$42.96<br />
2 boxes return labels……………………………………. 51.94<br />
_________<br />
Total $ 94.90<br />
<strong>Print</strong>ing & Paper:<br />
1 Cover letter on DTS letterhead @$20.00…………......$ 20.00<br />
<strong>Print</strong>ing of Survey Cover letter @ $19.48………………. 19.48<br />
3 page survey (front and back) printing ……………….. 116.91<br />
_________<br />
Total $156.39<br />
Grand Total of Expenses $ 504.29
206 <br />
APPENDIX E<br />
E-MAIL REMINDER LETTER<br />
February 10, 2008<br />
Dear DTS Women Students,<br />
I want to thank those of you who have already returned your completed DTS Women<br />
Students’ Survey. Your diligence and honest responses are greatly appreciated and I look<br />
<strong>for</strong>ward to analyzing the data and then doing what I can to act in response to provide the<br />
ministry and resources needed to hopefully address meeting your needs and issues.<br />
If you have not yet returned your survey, it is still not too late! Due to the delays related<br />
to sending things through the mail, I have extended the deadline <strong>for</strong> returning your survey<br />
from the original deadline of February 15, 2008 to March 1, 2008 to allow <strong>for</strong> a greater<br />
response.<br />
Thanking you in advance <strong>for</strong> going ahead and filling out your survey and returning it to<br />
me by March 1, 2008. Your input and responses are crucial <strong>for</strong> the accuracy and<br />
significance of this research and then ultimately to meet your needs and address your<br />
issues while you continue your study and training at DTS.<br />
Blessings,<br />
Lynn Etta Manning<br />
Advisor <strong>for</strong> Women Students<br />
3909 Swiss Avenue<br />
<strong>Dallas</strong>, TX 75204
207 <br />
APPENDIX F<br />
CODING FOR SURVEY DATA RESULTS<br />
(used <strong>with</strong> EXCEL spreadsheet)<br />
0 means no answer or N/A (not applicable)<br />
A1.Current Age<br />
1 – 20 – 29<br />
2 – 30 – 39<br />
3 – 40 – 49<br />
4 – 50 – 59<br />
5 – 60 – 69<br />
6 – 70 or older<br />
A2. Current Marital Status<br />
1 – Single<br />
2 – Married<br />
A3. Degree Program or Certificate of Graduate Studies<br />
1 – ThM<br />
2 – MA<br />
3 – CGS<br />
4 – Other<br />
A4. Currently Attending on <strong>Dallas</strong> Campus<br />
1 – Yes<br />
2 – No<br />
A5. Current Student Status<br />
1 – Full-time<br />
2 – Part-time<br />
A6. Spiritual Formation Participation<br />
1 – Yes<br />
2 – No<br />
A7. American Citizen<br />
1 – Yes<br />
2 – No
208 <br />
B1. Struggle <strong>with</strong> Depression<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
B2. Struggle <strong>with</strong> low self-esteem<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
B3. Struggle <strong>with</strong> perfectionism<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
B4. Struggle <strong>with</strong> loneliness<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
B5. Struggle <strong>with</strong> unhealthy personal body image<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
B6. Struggle <strong>with</strong> bulimia or anorexia<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
B7. Drink alcoholic beverages while at DTS<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always
209 <br />
B8. Married – Struggle <strong>with</strong> balancing marriage, family, and requirements of DTS<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
B9. Single – Struggle <strong>with</strong> balancing personal life, family, and requirements of DTS<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
B10. Struggle <strong>with</strong> being faithful to my husband in my thought life<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
B11. Struggle <strong>with</strong> being faithful to my husband by my actions<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
B12. Struggle <strong>with</strong> low self-confidence<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
B13. Discontent in my singleness<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always
210 <br />
B14. Discontent in my marriage<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
B15. Struggle <strong>with</strong> having homosexual desires<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
B16. Struggle <strong>with</strong> sexual needs that I resolve <strong>with</strong> masturbation<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
B17. Use or view pornography<br />
1 – Yes<br />
2 – No<br />
B18. Struggle <strong>with</strong> doubts about my faith and beliefs<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
B19. Difficulty handling stress<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
B20. Difficulty handling anxiety/fear<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always
211 <br />
B21. Have panic attacks<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
B22. Struggle <strong>with</strong> insecurity<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
B23. Struggle <strong>with</strong> comparing self to other women<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
B24. Struggle <strong>with</strong> communicating intentions properly <strong>with</strong> opposite sex<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
B25. Difficulty developing meaning friendships <strong>with</strong> male DTS students<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
B26. Difficulty developing meaningful friendships <strong>with</strong> married women students<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
B27. Difficulty developing meaningful friendships <strong>with</strong> single women students<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always
212 <br />
B28. Current satisfaction <strong>with</strong> support/friendship network<br />
1 – Yes<br />
2 – No<br />
B29. Single and sexually active<br />
1 – Yes<br />
2 – No<br />
B30. Been sexually abused<br />
1 – Yes<br />
2 – No<br />
B31. Been verbally and/or emotionally abused<br />
1 – Yes<br />
2 – No<br />
B32. Been physically abused<br />
1 – Yes<br />
2 – No<br />
C1. Had older Christian woman in past to talk <strong>with</strong> regularly<br />
1 – Yes<br />
2 – No<br />
C2. Currently have older Christian woman to talk <strong>with</strong> regularly<br />
1 – Yes<br />
2 – No<br />
C3. If no to C2, would you like to have an older Christian woman to talk <strong>with</strong><br />
regularly?<br />
1 – Yes<br />
2 – No<br />
C4. Have a peer as a spiritual mentor to spend time <strong>with</strong> regularly<br />
1 – Yes<br />
2 – No
213 <br />
C5. Would like to have a peer spiritual mentor on a regular basis<br />
1 – Yes<br />
2 – No<br />
C6. Have overwhelming financial needs<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
C7. Have had an abortion in past and still need help to work through painful thoughts<br />
and emotions<br />
0 – N/A<br />
1 – Yes<br />
2 – No<br />
C8. Difficult to meet other women students<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
C9. Have a close friend(s) to spend time <strong>with</strong> regularly<br />
1 – Yes<br />
2 – No<br />
C10. Difficult to meet and <strong>for</strong>m friendships <strong>with</strong> wives of DTS male students<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
C11. Need more personal and relational connection <strong>with</strong> other DTS female students<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always
214 <br />
C12. New student – needed someone to connect <strong>with</strong> on campus<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
C13. Need someone to be accountable to <strong>for</strong> attitudes and actions<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
C14. Need help <strong>with</strong> do’s and don’ts of dating and healthy boundaries<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
C15. Desire to marry consumes thought life<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
C16. Have family needs/issues disruptive to academic work<br />
0 – No answer 4 – Moderately<br />
1 – Never 5 – Often<br />
2 – Rarely 6 – Usually<br />
3 – Somewhat 7 – Always<br />
C16b. List those needs or issues<br />
Written Comments reported in Chapter 4<br />
D1. Since becoming a DTS student, non-academic needs are to have:<br />
a. a close friend<br />
1 – no need<br />
2 – some<br />
3 – often<br />
4 – significant<br />
5 – greatest need
215 <br />
b. an older Christian woman as a mentor<br />
1 – no need<br />
2 – some<br />
3 – often<br />
4 – significant<br />
5 – greatest need<br />
c. a meaningful relationship <strong>with</strong> DTS faculty or staff<br />
1 – no need<br />
2 – some<br />
3 – often<br />
4 – significant<br />
5 – greatest need<br />
d. extra-curricular social activities on DTS campus<br />
1 – no need<br />
2 – some<br />
3 – often<br />
4 – significant<br />
5 – greatest need<br />
e. training in dating and social skills<br />
1 – no need<br />
2 – some<br />
3 – often<br />
4 – significant<br />
5 – greatest need<br />
f. seminars addressing common personal struggles<br />
1 – no need<br />
2 – some<br />
3 – often<br />
4 – significant<br />
5 – greatest need<br />
g. opportunity to get to know wives of DTS male students<br />
1 – no need<br />
2 – some<br />
3 – often<br />
4 – significant<br />
5 – greatest need
216 <br />
D2. Would like to have speakers on any of following subjects<br />
a. abortion f. marriage<br />
1 – no need 1 – no need<br />
2 – some 2 – some<br />
3 – often 3 - often<br />
4 – significant 4 - significant<br />
5 – greatest need 5 – greatest need<br />
b. depression g. grief<br />
1 – no need 1 – no need<br />
2 – some 2 – some<br />
3 – often 3 – often<br />
4 – significant 4 – significant<br />
5 – greatest need 5 – greatest need<br />
c. divorce h. time management<br />
1 – no need 1 – no need<br />
2 – some 2 – some<br />
3 – often 3 – often<br />
4 – significant 4 – significant<br />
5 – greatest need 5 – greatest need<br />
d. eating disorders i. healthy body image<br />
1 – no need 1 – no need<br />
2 – some 2 – some<br />
3 – often 3 – often<br />
4 – significant 4 – significant<br />
5 – greatest need 5 – greatest need<br />
e. homosexuality j. (written suggestions) reported<br />
1 – no need in Chapter 4<br />
2 – some<br />
3 – often<br />
4 – significant<br />
5 – greatest need<br />
E1. Needs or struggles you face not on this survey<br />
1 – Yes<br />
2 – No<br />
E2. If so, what are they?<br />
Written comments transcribed
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY<br />
Aelred of Rivaulx. Spiritual Friendship. tran. Mary Eugenia Laker. Kalamazoo, MI:<br />
Cistercian, 1977.<br />
Anderson, Keith R. and Randy D. Reese. Spiritual Mentoring: A Guide <strong>for</strong> Seeking and<br />
Giving Direction. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1999.<br />
Arn, Win and Charles Arn. The Master’s Plan <strong>for</strong> Making Disciples. Grand Rapids, MI:<br />
Baker Books, 1998.<br />
Bailey, Mark and Tom Constable. “Titus,” in Nelson’s New Testament Survey, eds.<br />
Charles R. Swindoll and Roy B. Zuck. Nashville: Word Publishing, 1999.<br />
Baker, Joye B. “An Analysis of the Leadership Challenges Facing the <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological<br />
Seminary Women Alumnae.” D.Min. diss., <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary, 2005.<br />
Baker, Joye B. “Working <strong>with</strong> Women Students in Field Education” in Preparing <strong>for</strong><br />
Ministry: A Practical Guide to Theological Field Education, ed. George Hillman,<br />
233-252. Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 2008.<br />
Barnard, C. A. “The Impact of Cell Phone Use on Building Community.” Student Affairs<br />
Online, 2003, 4 (4). Retrieved Nov. 4, 2003.<br />
Beasley-Topliffe, Keith, ed. The Upper Room Dictionary of Christian Spiritual<br />
Formation. Nashville: Upper Room Books, 2003.<br />
Benner, David G. Care of Souls: Revisioning Christian Nurture and Counsel. Grand<br />
Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1998.<br />
Benner, David G. Sacred Companions: The Gift of Spiritual Friendship and Direction.<br />
Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2002.<br />
Betters, Sharon W. Treasures of Encouragement. Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing<br />
Company, 1996.<br />
Biehl, Bobb. Mentoring: Confidence in Finding a Mentor and Becoming One. Nashville:<br />
Broadman & Holman Publishers, 1996.<br />
Blair, Edward P. “Titus,” The Illustrated Bible Handbook. Nashville: Abingdon Press,<br />
1987.<br />
Blumberg, Joan Jacobs. Fasting Girls. New York: New American Library, 1989.<br />
Bonhoeffer, Dietrich. Life Together. New York: Harper and Row Publishers, 1954.<br />
217
218 <br />
Booher, Dianna. Well-Connected: Power Your Own Soul by Plugging Into Others.<br />
Nashville: Word Publishing, 2000.<br />
Borges, Nicole J. et al., “Comparing Millennial and Generation X Medical Students at<br />
One Medical School,” Academic Medicine. Vol. 81, No. 6, June 2006: 571-576.<br />
Brazo, Carol. Divine Secrets of Mentoring. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2004.<br />
Broido, Ellen M. “Understanding Diversity in Millennial Students,” Serving the<br />
Millennial Generation, New Directions <strong>for</strong> Student Services, no. 106, Wiley<br />
Periodicals, Inc., 78-91, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Summer 2004.<br />
Bruce, A. B. The Training of the Twelve. Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 1988.<br />
Burns, Stephen. “What’s a Lonely Person to Do?” Discipleship Journal. Vol. 162, 2007.<br />
Burroughs, Esther. A Garden Path to Mentoring. Birmingham, AL: New Hope<br />
Publishers, 1997.<br />
Bush, Barbara. “Wellesley Commencement Address.” Wellesley Website:<br />
Wellesleyhttp://www.Wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1990/bush,<br />
html, accessed 28 March 2008.<br />
Clinton, J. Robert and Richard W. Clinton. The Mentor Handbook. Altadena, CA:<br />
Barnabas, 1991.<br />
Coleman, Robert E. The Master Plan of Discipleship. Grand Rapids, MI: Fleming H.<br />
Revell, 1998.<br />
Collins, Gary R. The Biblical Basis of Christian Counseling <strong>for</strong> People Helpers.<br />
Colorado Springs: NavPress, 1993.<br />
Cook, Muriel L. and Shelley Cook Volkhardt. Kitchen Table Counseling. Colorado<br />
Springs: NavPress, 2006.<br />
Creswell, John W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods<br />
Approaches 2 nd Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2003.<br />
<strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary Catalog. <strong>Dallas</strong>, TX: <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary, 2007-<br />
2008.<br />
<strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary Student Handbook. <strong>Dallas</strong>, TX: <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological<br />
Seminary, 2008.<br />
Daloz, Laurent A. Effective Teaching and Mentoring: Realizing the Trans<strong>for</strong>mational<br />
Power of Adult Learning and Experiences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986.
219 <br />
Daloz, Laurent A. Mentor: Guiding the Journey of Adult Learners. San Francisco:<br />
Jossey-Bass, Inc. Publishers, 1999.<br />
DePree, Max. Forward to Mentoring: The Promise of Relational Leadership, by W.C.<br />
Wright. Waynesboro, GA: Paternoster Press, 2006.<br />
Dobson, James C. Straight Talk to Men and Their Wives. Waco, TX: Word Publishing,<br />
1984.<br />
Duff, Carolyn. Learning From Other Women: How to Benefit From the Knowledge,<br />
Wisdom, and Experience of Female Mentors. New York: AMACOM, 1999.<br />
Dugal, Michael W. Chaplain (LTC). “Spiritual Direction: A Deliberate Response <strong>for</strong><br />
Taking Spiritual Leadership to the Next Level,” The Army Chaplaincy<br />
Professional Bulletin of the Unit Ministry Team, ed. Chaplain David A. Kenehan,<br />
Winter-Spring 2006: 12-18.<br />
Easterbrook, Gregg. The Progress Paradox. New York: Random House, 2003.<br />
Edwards, Sue, Kelley Mathews, and Henry Rogers. Mixed Ministry: Working Together<br />
as Brothers and Sisters in An Oversexed Society. Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel<br />
Publications, 2008.<br />
English, Leona M. and Lorna Bowman M. A. “Working With Experience: the Mentor,<br />
the Context, the Possibility,” British Journal of Theological Education, Vol. 12,<br />
no. 1, (August 2001): 40-56.<br />
English, Leona, Mentoring in Religious Education. Birmingham, AL: Religious<br />
Education Press, 1998.<br />
English, Leona. “The Tradition of Teresa of Avila and Its Implications <strong>for</strong> Mentoring of<br />
Religious Educators.” Religious Education, Vol. 91, (1996): 86-103.<br />
Feldhan, Shaunti and Jeff Feldhan. For Men Only: A Straight<strong>for</strong>ward Guide to the Inner<br />
Lives of Women. Atlanta, GA: Multnomah Publisher, Inc., 2006.<br />
Floyd J. Fowler, Jr. Survey Research Methods 3 rd Ed. Applied Social Research Method<br />
Series, Vol. 1, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2002.<br />
Gardiner, Maria, Marika Tiggemann, Hugh Kearns, and Kelly Marshall. “Show Me the<br />
Money! An Empirical Analysis of Mentoring Outcomes <strong>for</strong> Women in<br />
Academia.” Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 26, no. 4,<br />
(December 2007): 425-442.<br />
Gay L. R. and Peter Airasian, Educational Research: Competencies <strong>for</strong> Analysis and<br />
Applications. 7 th Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2003.
220 <br />
Goodman, Ellen and Patricia O’Brien. I Know Just What You Mean. New York: Simon<br />
and Schuster, 2000.<br />
Gove, Philip Bancock, ed. Webster’s Third International Dictionary. Springfield, MA: G.<br />
& C. Merriam, 1981.<br />
Greenlee, J. Harold. An Exegetical Summary of Titus and Philemon. <strong>Dallas</strong>, TX: Summer<br />
Institute of Linguistics, Inc., 1989.<br />
Hart, Dipa. “Field Education and Cultural Awareness,” in Preparing <strong>for</strong> Ministry: A<br />
Practical Guide to Theological Field Education, ed., George Hillman, 73-90.<br />
Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 2008.<br />
Hellmich, Nanci. “Looking Thin and Fit Weighs More on Women,” USA Today,<br />
25September, 1995.<br />
Hendricks, Howard G. and William D. Hendricks. As Iron Sharpens Iron: Building<br />
Character in a Mentoring Relationship. Chicago: Moody Press, 1995.<br />
Hendricks, Jeanne. A Woman <strong>for</strong> All Seasons. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, Inc., 1977.<br />
Hislop, Beverly White. Shepherding a Woman’s Heart. Chicago: Moody Publishers,<br />
2003.<br />
Holmes, Sharon L. (SUNY at Binghatnton) and Lynette Danley Land (University of<br />
Utah), and Veronica D. Hinton-Hudson (University of Louisville). “Race Still<br />
Matters: Considerations <strong>for</strong> Mentoring, The Negro Education Review, Vol. 58,<br />
Nos. 1-2, Spring/Summer 2007.<br />
Houston, James M. “Why the Contemporary Interest in Mentoring?” Christian Education<br />
Journal. Perry Downs, ed. Deerfield, IL: Trinity Evangelical Divinity School,<br />
1997.<br />
Houston, James M. The Mentored Life: From Individualism to Personhood. Colorado<br />
Springs, CO: NavPress, 2002.<br />
Howe, Neil and William Strauss. Millennials Go To College. Second Edition. USA:<br />
LifeCourse Associates, 2007.<br />
Hull, Bill. Jesus Christ, Disciplemaker. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2004.<br />
Humphreys, A. E. The Epistles to Timothy and Titus. Cambridge: The University Press,<br />
1895.<br />
Hunt, Susan. Spiritual Mothering. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 1992.<br />
Hutchinson, R. W. Prehistoric Crete. Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books, 1962.
221 <br />
Jepsen, Dee. Women Beyond Equal Rights. Waco, TX: Word Publishing, 1984.<br />
Keller, Phillip. A Shepherd Looks at the Twenty-Third Psalm. Grand Rapids, MI:<br />
Zondervan Publishing House, 1970.<br />
Kettel, Gerhard. ed. Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, trans. and ed.<br />
Geoffrey W. Bromiley, Vol. 4. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1967.<br />
Koro-Ljungberg Mirka and Sharon Hayes. (University of Florida). “The Relational<br />
Selves of Female Graduate Students During Academic Mentoring: From Dialogue<br />
to Trans<strong>for</strong>mation,” Mentoring and Tutoring. no. 4, (November 2006): 14.<br />
Kraft, Vickie. Women Mentoring Women. Chicago: Moody Press, 1992.<br />
Lane, Robert E. The Loss of Happiness in Market Democracies. New Haven, CT: Yale<br />
University Press, 2001.<br />
Lawson, Michael. D is <strong>for</strong> Depression. Ross-shire, Scotland: Christian Focus<br />
Publications, Geanies House, 2006.<br />
Lenski, R. C. H. The Interpretation of St. Paul’s Epistles to the Colossians, to the<br />
Thessalonians, to Timothy, to Titus and to Philemon. Minneapolis, MN:<br />
Augsburg Publishing House, 1937.<br />
Lewis, Robert. The New Eve. Nashville: B&H Publishing Group, 2008.<br />
Libert, Elizabeth. “Coming Home to Themselves: Women’s Spiritual Care,” Through the<br />
Eyes of Women: Insight <strong>for</strong> Pastoral Care, ed. Jeanne Stevenson Moessner.<br />
Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Fortress, 1996.<br />
Lock, Walter. “The Pastoral Epistles.” The International Critical Commentary.<br />
Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1924.<br />
“Look at All the Lonely People.” Christianity Today. Vol. 50, no 11, November 2006.<br />
Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, Inc.,<br />
1998.<br />
Miller, William A. and Kathleen A. Jackson. Practical Psychology <strong>for</strong> Pastors, Second<br />
Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1995.<br />
Mitchell, Albert W. “An Exposition of Paul’s Specific Pastoral Instruction to Titus.”<br />
Th.M. thesis, <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary, 1970.<br />
Mitchell, Henry and Nicholas Lewter. Soul Theology. New York: Harper & Row, 1986.<br />
Murray, M. and M. Owen. Beyond the Myths and Magic of Mentoring. San Francisco:<br />
Jossey-Bass, 1991.
222 <br />
Myers, David G. The American Paradox: Spiritual Hunger in an Age of Plenty. New<br />
Haven & London: Yale University Press, 2000.<br />
Neuger, Christie Cozad. “A Feminist Perspective on Pastoral Counseling <strong>with</strong> Women,”<br />
Clinical Handbook of Pastoral Counseling, Vol. 2, eds. Robert J. Wicks and<br />
Richard Parsons. New York: Paulist Press, 1993.<br />
Newman, Deborah. Then God Created Woman. Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House Publishers,<br />
1997.<br />
Newman, Deborah. A Woman’s Search <strong>for</strong> Worth. Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House<br />
Publishers, 2002.<br />
Newman, Deborah. Passion on Purpose. Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House Publishers, 2003.<br />
Nouwen, Henri J. Adam, God’s Beloved. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1997.<br />
Otto, Donna. Finding a Mentor, Being A Mentor. Eugene, OR: Harvest House Publishers,<br />
2001.<br />
Parrott, Les III and Leslie Parrott. The Marriage Manual. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan<br />
Publishing House, 1995.<br />
Pintus, Peter. “At the Heart of Loneliness.” Discipleship Journal. Vol. 162, 2007.<br />
Purdue, Cary M. 2 Timothy and Titus Explained. Paco Manila: O.M.F. Publishers, 1975.<br />
Putnam, Robert. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New<br />
York: Simon & Schuster, 2000.<br />
Schaller, Janet. “Mentoring of Women: Trans<strong>for</strong>mation in Adult Religious Education,”<br />
Religious Education, no. 2, Spring 1996: 91.<br />
Scheele, A. “Second Stage Mentoring,” Working Woman. 17 October 1992.<br />
Sheehy, Gail. New Passages: Mapping Your Life Across Time. New York: Ballantine,<br />
1995.<br />
Sheehy, Gail. Pathfinders. New York: Bantam Books, 1981.<br />
Sheehy, Sandy. Connecting: The Enduring Power of Female Friendship. New York:<br />
HarperCollins Publishers, Inc., 2000.<br />
Shubert, Jeannette M. Entz. “An Evaluation of the Seminary Wives in Ministry Program<br />
at <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary.” D.Min. diss., <strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary,<br />
2001.<br />
Sinetar, Marsha. The Mentor’s Spirit: Life Lessons on Leadership and the Art of<br />
Encouragement, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999.
223 <br />
Stanley, Paul D. and J. Robert Clinton. Connecting: The Mentoring Relationships You<br />
Need to Succeed in Life. Colorado Springs: NavPress, 1992.<br />
Stepp, Laura Sessions. “These Teens Are at the Top in Everything, Including Stress,”<br />
Washington Post, 5 May 2002.<br />
Swindoll, Charles. “Does Your Figure of Speech Look Fat?” Kindred Spirit, <strong>Dallas</strong>, TX:<br />
<strong>Dallas</strong> Theological Seminary Publishers, Vol. 32, no. 2, Summer 2008.<br />
Tannen, Deborah. You Just Don’t Understand. New York: HarperCollins Publishers,<br />
2007.<br />
Twenge, Jean. Generation Me: Why Today’s Young Americans Are More Confident,<br />
Assertive, Entitled – and More Miserable Than Ever Be<strong>for</strong>e. New York: Free<br />
Press, 2006.<br />
Vine, W. E. An Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words. Old Tappan, NJ: Revell,<br />
1966.<br />
Walvoord, John F. and Roy B Zuck, eds. “Titus.” The Bible Knowledge Commentary,<br />
New Testament, 761-767. Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1985.<br />
Williams, Brian. The Potter’s Rib: Mentoring <strong>for</strong> Pastoral Formation. Vancouver, BC<br />
Canada: Regent College Publishing, 2005.<br />
Wimberly, Edward P. African American Pastoral Care. Nashville: Abingdon Press,<br />
1991.<br />
Wimberly, Edward P. Using Scripture in Pastoral Counseling, Nashville: Abingdon<br />
Press, 1994.