Proceedings of the Seventh Mountain Lion Workshop
Proceedings of the Seventh Mountain Lion Workshop
Proceedings of the Seventh Mountain Lion Workshop
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NEVADA MOUNTAIN LION STATUS REPORT<br />
RUSSELL WOOLSTENHULME, Nevada Department <strong>of</strong> Conservation & Natural Resources,<br />
1100 Valley View Road, Reno, NV 89512, USA, email: rwoolstenhulme@ndow.org<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The Nevada Division <strong>of</strong> Wildlife<br />
completed its Comprehensive <strong>Mountain</strong><br />
<strong>Lion</strong> Management Plan in January 1995.<br />
The Nevada Board <strong>of</strong> Wildlife<br />
Commissioners approved <strong>the</strong> plan in<br />
October <strong>of</strong> that year. The plan is scheduled<br />
for revision during 2003.<br />
The goals and objectives <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mountain<br />
lion plan are to maintain lion distribution in<br />
reasonable densities throughout Nevada, to<br />
control mountain lions creating a public<br />
safety hazard or causing property damage,<br />
and to provide recreational, educational and<br />
scientific use opportunities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mountain<br />
lion resource. Additional goals include<br />
maintaining a balance between mountain<br />
lions and <strong>the</strong>ir prey, and finally to manage<br />
mountain lions as a metapopulation.<br />
The mountain lion’s legal classification<br />
in Nevada was changed by regulation from<br />
unprotected (predator) to game animal in<br />
1965. The change in classification resulted<br />
in <strong>the</strong> requirement <strong>of</strong> a valid hunting license<br />
to hunt mountain lion, along with some<br />
restrictions in <strong>the</strong> method <strong>of</strong> take. This<br />
provision precluded <strong>the</strong> taking <strong>of</strong> lions at<br />
any time o<strong>the</strong>r than from sunrise to sunset<br />
and it also defined legal weapons as<br />
shotgun, rifle, or bow and arrow. The<br />
season was defined as ei<strong>the</strong>r sex, yearround,<br />
and no limit was set nor was a tag<br />
required. <strong>Mountain</strong> lion harvest<br />
management has changed substantially from<br />
1965 to <strong>the</strong> present.<br />
In 1968, a tag requirement was<br />
instituted, and although no limits were<br />
established, it became possible to record<br />
31<br />
<strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Seventh</strong> <strong>Mountain</strong> <strong>Lion</strong> <strong>Workshop</strong><br />
sport hunter harvest. Ano<strong>the</strong>r major change<br />
occurred in 1970, when a limit <strong>of</strong> one lion<br />
per person was set, and a six-month season<br />
was established. During that year, <strong>the</strong><br />
requirement that all harvested lions be<br />
validated by a representative <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Department within five days after <strong>the</strong> kill<br />
was also established. This regulation<br />
presented <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>the</strong> first real<br />
opportunity to collect biological data from<br />
<strong>the</strong> mountain lion.<br />
In 1972, <strong>the</strong> Nevada Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Wildlife initiated a study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mountain<br />
lion as a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ruby-Butte deer project<br />
in eastern Nevada. The objective was to<br />
determine <strong>the</strong> status <strong>of</strong> lion populations<br />
within this high-density deer area, and, to<br />
evaluate <strong>the</strong>m in relation to deer<br />
populations. Within two years, this<br />
objective was changed to: a) establish<br />
population estimates <strong>of</strong> mountain lions by<br />
mountain range or management area<br />
statewide, b) establish basic habitat<br />
requirements, c) establish a harvest<br />
management program. From that period on,<br />
increased emphasis was placed upon lion<br />
capture and marking with <strong>the</strong> more<br />
sophisticated telemetry devices which were<br />
being manufactured. This program involved<br />
lion monitoring from both land and air and<br />
was instrumental in expanding our life<br />
history information base, as well as<br />
providing an approach toward estimating <strong>the</strong><br />
annual population status in key mountain<br />
ranges. The findings from this study were<br />
<strong>the</strong>n utilized in formulating an approach<br />
toward estimating statewide lion<br />
populations. This ten (10) year study formed