30.10.2012 Views

Proceedings of the Seventh Mountain Lion Workshop

Proceedings of the Seventh Mountain Lion Workshop

Proceedings of the Seventh Mountain Lion Workshop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NEVADA MOUNTAIN LION STATUS REPORT<br />

RUSSELL WOOLSTENHULME, Nevada Department <strong>of</strong> Conservation & Natural Resources,<br />

1100 Valley View Road, Reno, NV 89512, USA, email: rwoolstenhulme@ndow.org<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The Nevada Division <strong>of</strong> Wildlife<br />

completed its Comprehensive <strong>Mountain</strong><br />

<strong>Lion</strong> Management Plan in January 1995.<br />

The Nevada Board <strong>of</strong> Wildlife<br />

Commissioners approved <strong>the</strong> plan in<br />

October <strong>of</strong> that year. The plan is scheduled<br />

for revision during 2003.<br />

The goals and objectives <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mountain<br />

lion plan are to maintain lion distribution in<br />

reasonable densities throughout Nevada, to<br />

control mountain lions creating a public<br />

safety hazard or causing property damage,<br />

and to provide recreational, educational and<br />

scientific use opportunities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mountain<br />

lion resource. Additional goals include<br />

maintaining a balance between mountain<br />

lions and <strong>the</strong>ir prey, and finally to manage<br />

mountain lions as a metapopulation.<br />

The mountain lion’s legal classification<br />

in Nevada was changed by regulation from<br />

unprotected (predator) to game animal in<br />

1965. The change in classification resulted<br />

in <strong>the</strong> requirement <strong>of</strong> a valid hunting license<br />

to hunt mountain lion, along with some<br />

restrictions in <strong>the</strong> method <strong>of</strong> take. This<br />

provision precluded <strong>the</strong> taking <strong>of</strong> lions at<br />

any time o<strong>the</strong>r than from sunrise to sunset<br />

and it also defined legal weapons as<br />

shotgun, rifle, or bow and arrow. The<br />

season was defined as ei<strong>the</strong>r sex, yearround,<br />

and no limit was set nor was a tag<br />

required. <strong>Mountain</strong> lion harvest<br />

management has changed substantially from<br />

1965 to <strong>the</strong> present.<br />

In 1968, a tag requirement was<br />

instituted, and although no limits were<br />

established, it became possible to record<br />

31<br />

<strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Seventh</strong> <strong>Mountain</strong> <strong>Lion</strong> <strong>Workshop</strong><br />

sport hunter harvest. Ano<strong>the</strong>r major change<br />

occurred in 1970, when a limit <strong>of</strong> one lion<br />

per person was set, and a six-month season<br />

was established. During that year, <strong>the</strong><br />

requirement that all harvested lions be<br />

validated by a representative <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Department within five days after <strong>the</strong> kill<br />

was also established. This regulation<br />

presented <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>the</strong> first real<br />

opportunity to collect biological data from<br />

<strong>the</strong> mountain lion.<br />

In 1972, <strong>the</strong> Nevada Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Wildlife initiated a study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mountain<br />

lion as a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ruby-Butte deer project<br />

in eastern Nevada. The objective was to<br />

determine <strong>the</strong> status <strong>of</strong> lion populations<br />

within this high-density deer area, and, to<br />

evaluate <strong>the</strong>m in relation to deer<br />

populations. Within two years, this<br />

objective was changed to: a) establish<br />

population estimates <strong>of</strong> mountain lions by<br />

mountain range or management area<br />

statewide, b) establish basic habitat<br />

requirements, c) establish a harvest<br />

management program. From that period on,<br />

increased emphasis was placed upon lion<br />

capture and marking with <strong>the</strong> more<br />

sophisticated telemetry devices which were<br />

being manufactured. This program involved<br />

lion monitoring from both land and air and<br />

was instrumental in expanding our life<br />

history information base, as well as<br />

providing an approach toward estimating <strong>the</strong><br />

annual population status in key mountain<br />

ranges. The findings from this study were<br />

<strong>the</strong>n utilized in formulating an approach<br />

toward estimating statewide lion<br />

populations. This ten (10) year study formed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!