01.11.2012 Views

World Congress of Brachytherapy 10-12 May, 2012 - Estro-events.org

World Congress of Brachytherapy 10-12 May, 2012 - Estro-events.org

World Congress of Brachytherapy 10-12 May, 2012 - Estro-events.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WCB<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>-<strong>12</strong> <strong>May</strong>, 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Barcelona, Spain


Cover photo: © Fotolia / Hugues Argence


WCB<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>-<strong>12</strong> <strong>May</strong>, 20<strong>12</strong> • Barcelona, Spain


WCB 20<strong>12</strong> content<br />

Thursday <strong>10</strong> <strong>May</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Symposium<br />

Welcome and introduction<br />

Modern brachytherapy: role <strong>of</strong> new image modalities (Abs. 1-6)<br />

Panel session<br />

Prospective trials for partial breast irradiation (Abs. 7-11)<br />

Award lecture<br />

Marie Curie medal presentation (Abs. <strong>12</strong>-13)<br />

Panel session<br />

Prostate 1: Is there a role for primary focal therapy? (Abs. 14-17)<br />

Physics 1: Dose to water calibration (Abs. 18-20)<br />

Gynaecology 1: Are we decreasing morbidity with image-guided brachytherapy? (Abs. 21-23)<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>fered papers<br />

Prostate 1 (Abs. 24-29)<br />

Prostate 2 (Abs. 30-38)<br />

Gynaecology 1 (Abs. 39-47)<br />

Friday 11 <strong>May</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Symposium<br />

Radiobiological modelling in brachytherapy: clinical relevance? (Abs. 48-50)<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>fered papers<br />

Miscellaneous (Abs. 51-56)<br />

Debate<br />

Key controversies on patient selection for partial breast irradiation (Abs. 57-58)<br />

Panel session<br />

2: A perspective on health economics in brachytherapy (Abs. 59-64)<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>fered papers<br />

Physics 1 (Abs. 65-70)<br />

Poster<br />

Poster highlights (Abs. 71-78)<br />

Panel session<br />

Prostate 2: Salvage treatment after brachytherapy failure (Abs. 79-80)


Pr<strong>of</strong>fered papers<br />

Gynaecology 2 (Abs. 81-86)<br />

Breast 1 (Abs. 87-92)<br />

Panel session<br />

Physics 2: Uncertainties in brachytherapy and how to report them? (Abs. 93-95)<br />

Symposium<br />

How to improve safety in brachytherapy? Practical examples (Abs. 96-97)<br />

Saturday <strong>12</strong> <strong>May</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Symposium<br />

New opportunities with robotic, endoscopic and radiological interventions (Abs. 98-<strong>10</strong>0)<br />

Role <strong>of</strong> IAEA and UICC in brachytherapy training (Abs. <strong>10</strong>1-<strong>10</strong>2)<br />

Skin brachytherapy (Abs. <strong>10</strong>3-<strong>10</strong>5)<br />

Panel session<br />

Gynaecology 2: Emerging evidence for image-based brachytherapy in cervical cancer (Abs. <strong>10</strong>6-<strong>10</strong>9)<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>fered papers<br />

Physics 2 (Abs. 1<strong>10</strong>-115)<br />

Panel session<br />

Physics 3: The advantages and criticalities <strong>of</strong> new dose calculation algorithms (Abs. 116-118)<br />

Poster discussion<br />

Session 1 (Abs. 119-<strong>12</strong>8)<br />

Panel session<br />

Gynaecology 3: Optimal adjuvant treatment for intermediate risk endometrial cancer (Abs. <strong>12</strong>9-130)<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>fered papers<br />

Breast 2 (Abs. 131-136)<br />

Panel session<br />

3: Repeat breast conservation with brachytherapy (Abs. 137-138)<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>fered papers<br />

Physics 3 (Abs. 139-144)<br />

Symposium<br />

One hundred years <strong>of</strong> prostate brachytherapy (Abs. 146)<br />

Posters<br />

Prostate (Abs. 147-233)<br />

Gynaecology (Abs. 234-3<strong>10</strong>)<br />

Breast (Abs. 311-325)<br />

Physics (Abs. 326-362)<br />

Miscellaneous (Abs. 363-420)


1<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

C.HaieMeder<br />

Institut Gustave Roussy, Radiation Oncology, Villejuif, France<br />

Target volume determination is probably one <strong>of</strong> the most challenging<br />

issues in radiation oncology, at the era <strong>of</strong> highly targeted<br />

radiotherapy. BT has to face this challenge, even in a more accurate<br />

way, as BT physical and biological properties provide the most<br />

conformal and normal tissue sparing radiotherapy technique. To reach<br />

this goal, BT has benefited from recent advanced imaging<br />

technologies. The use <strong>of</strong> 3D techniques for BT dosimetry has increased<br />

during the recent years, mainly CTbased, but also using MRI, PETCT<br />

and ultrasound. Image guidance improves tumor and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk<br />

visualization, and their relationship with the applicator (in<br />

gynecological tumors), representing the basis for 3D and 4D BT<br />

treatments plans.<br />

Prostate BT was developed using ultrasound guidance. The accuracy<br />

<strong>of</strong> seed placement and dosevolume parameters has significantly<br />

improved with more sophisticated imaging modalities. Emerging<br />

techniques in ultrasound and MRI modalities, including functional<br />

imaging, as well as 3D digital mapping, allow for more accurate<br />

disease characterization with improvement in staging and<br />

management <strong>of</strong> the tumor. This issue represents the basis for dose<br />

painting.<br />

In cervical cancer BT, MRI based adaptive BT enables 4D target<br />

volume optimization with appropriate dosevolume constraints for<br />

<strong>org</strong>ans at risk. First clinical series report an improvement in local<br />

control which seems to translate into a survival benefit. Ultrasound is<br />

an evolving field and is currently under study. The value <strong>of</strong> functional<br />

MRI or PETCT is also under investigation.<br />

In endometrial cancer, postoperative BT has become the new<br />

standard in intermediaterisk patients. In this situation, there is a<br />

potential for imagebased individualization which is under<br />

investigation.<br />

Apart from these two main tumor sites, BT using new imaging<br />

modalities has been developed in other fields, such as breast, head<br />

and neck and endoluminal (bronchus, oesophagus).<br />

In the last decade, the use <strong>of</strong> imaging modalities integrated into the<br />

BT procedure has led to a significant increase <strong>of</strong> BT all over the world.<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> images also led to the development <strong>of</strong> BT guidelines,<br />

allowing multiinstitutional studies, contributing to clinical research<br />

and scientific publications.<br />

2<br />

ROLE OF FUNCTIONAL IMAGING<br />

B. Carey 1<br />

1<br />

St James Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS<br />

Trust, Radiology, Leeds, United Kingdom<br />

The evolution <strong>of</strong> the art <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy into a precision form <strong>of</strong><br />

scientifically based radiation therapy owes much to major<br />

developments in imaging and computer technology over the past<br />

decade. <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> <strong>of</strong>fers the most conformal <strong>of</strong> all forms <strong>of</strong><br />

radiotherapy and is designed largely around the intricate relationships<br />

between radiation dose delivered, target volume and fractionation<br />

regimes. Traditional brachytherapy planning techniques have<br />

benefited enormously from morphological imaging techniques such as<br />

Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound.<br />

Tumour volumetricbased radiation planning based on better anatomy<br />

has much improved our ability to target malignant tissue whilst<br />

sparing nonmalignant tissues. 3D target localisation has been<br />

successfully modelled around a hierarchy <strong>of</strong> expanding treatment<br />

volumes based on the demonstrable tumour morphology as well as<br />

allowing for technical imperfections and variations in treatment<br />

delivery. A new paradigm for treatment planning and radiation<br />

delivery is now becoming possible with the ability <strong>of</strong> medical imaging<br />

<br />

<br />

to define areas <strong>of</strong> varying functional activity within the presumed<br />

tumour mass.<br />

A new probability envelope is emerging based on our recognition <strong>of</strong><br />

the altered biological and molecular processes occurring in tumour<br />

tissue. A biological target volume can be identified generally as a<br />

subset or subsets <strong>of</strong> the morphological target volume and <strong>of</strong>fers a<br />

potentially modified approach for brachytherapy. These new<br />

functional maps <strong>of</strong> the tumour provide the basis for a very innovative<br />

approach to radiation treatment using much more selective planning<br />

and treatment delivery techniques. Locating and quantifying areas <strong>of</strong><br />

cellular and molecular disruptions within the tumour mass <strong>of</strong>fer the<br />

potential to individualise the radiotherapy treatment and the highly<br />

conformal and adaptive nature <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy perhaps stands to<br />

gain most from these new functional imaging techniques.<br />

FDGPET has become an established imaging technique in oncology<br />

and is becoming increasingly integrated into treatment planning<br />

processes for several common tumour sites. Newer isotopes are being<br />

developed to further expand the depth and range <strong>of</strong> our knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />

tumour behaviour and will <strong>of</strong>fer future targets for brachytherapy dose<br />

delivery and modifications. Functional MRI is providing us with<br />

additional physiological surrogate targets for dose modifications.<br />

Newer developments in functional Ultrasound and CT will also<br />

enhance the information available to the radiation oncologist and<br />

yield a much more detailed map <strong>of</strong> tumour architecture and function.<br />

The inherent goal <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy is to safely deliver adequate<br />

radiation to those areas <strong>of</strong> tumour tissue that are considered<br />

necessary based on our current understanding <strong>of</strong> tumour biology and<br />

radiation response. Functional imaging <strong>of</strong>fers us a way forward in<br />

identifying subvolumes <strong>of</strong> tumour that may benefit from different<br />

radiation regimes based on different measurements <strong>of</strong> tumour<br />

response. Furthermore, we have the future potential to noninvasively<br />

assess these treatment responses in terms <strong>of</strong> altered cellular and<br />

molecular processes as well as altered tumour morphology. These are<br />

exciting times for functional imaging based brachytherapy.<br />

3<br />

PET IMAGING IN BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

V. Lowe 1<br />

1 <strong>May</strong>o Clinic, <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Rochester, USA<br />

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is now being widely in the<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> many types <strong>of</strong> malignancy. Multiple studies have<br />

demonstrated the utility <strong>of</strong> PET in oncologic imaging in better staging<br />

<strong>of</strong> disease, earlier treatment response assessment and better<br />

characterization <strong>of</strong> recurrent disease over what can be done with<br />

anatomic imaging methods alone. The availability metabolic<br />

substrates other than FDG makes PET imaging attractive in some<br />

tumors that have been otherwise poorly evaluated by FDG. This talk<br />

will discuss the use <strong>of</strong> Choline PET imaging with discussion <strong>of</strong> how it<br />

can be used in conjunction with brachytherapy<br />

While prostate cancer cells have not ubiquitously shown FDG avidity,<br />

increased choline uptake has been a more consistent finding on PET<br />

imaging. Cancer cells have more rapid cell proliferation than normal<br />

cells. New cells require the building blocks for cell membranes.<br />

Choline is a watersoluble essential nutrient grouped with B<br />

complex vitamins—that is vital for a) cell membrane structure and<br />

signaling b) synthesis <strong>of</strong> neurotransmitters and c) general metabolism.<br />

[ 11 C]choline is a synthetic form <strong>of</strong> choline that releases positrons by<br />

beta decay that can be visualized by PET. [ 18 F]choline is another<br />

radionuclide version <strong>of</strong> choline that can also be used in PET imaging.<br />

The increased accumulation <strong>of</strong> these agents by prostate cancer in any<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the body is a reliable way to determine the extent <strong>of</strong> prostate<br />

cancer.<br />

Choline PET can be use in two different treatment time points in<br />

prostate cancer related to brachytherapy. At initial staging,<br />

confirmation <strong>of</strong> localized disease to the prostate bed can be<br />

performed using choline PET. Choline PET provides high accuracy for<br />

the detection <strong>of</strong> distant metastasis. This can aid in treatment<br />

planning. Choline PET may be most useful in the situation <strong>of</strong><br />

definitively treated prostate cancer with the discovery <strong>of</strong> biochemical<br />

recurrence. One <strong>of</strong> the clinical dilemmas <strong>of</strong> biochemical recurrence <strong>of</strong><br />

prostate cancer is the how to decide on an optimal treatment


S2 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

strategy. Assessment <strong>of</strong> the prostate bed post brachytherapy is<br />

accurately performed by Choline PET. In this situation other imaging<br />

modalities are modestly compromised. This assessment by choline Pet<br />

<strong>of</strong> the treatment outcome <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> the prostate is<br />

probably best performed after the PSA nadir postbrachytherapy.<br />

Choline PET imaging in prostate cancer is one example <strong>of</strong> how PET<br />

imaging can be used to assess treatment planning and outcome <strong>of</strong><br />

brachytherapy.<br />

4<br />

MRI: IMPACT ON BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

I.M. JürgenliemkSchulz 1<br />

1 U.M.C. Utrecht, Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />

The combined key words “MRI” and “brachytherapy (BT)” give PubMed<br />

hits from 1984 onwards. Since then the amount <strong>of</strong> positive hits is<br />

increasing, reflecting the relevance <strong>of</strong> MR information for BT<br />

developments. Nowadays MRI is especially used for BT treatment<br />

planning and/or optimization in prostate, cervix and brain tumors. In<br />

other tumor sites like head and neck, sarcomas, breast, endometrial<br />

and rectal cancer MRI is catching up. During the years we see a<br />

development from low magnetic field strength machines and<br />

anatomical imaging to high field equipment allowing more precise<br />

anatomical and additional functional sequences. And approaches for<br />

interventional MR imaging during BT procedures are coming up.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> all this effort is to optimize treatment strategies so that<br />

better control and outcome can be obtained by radiotherapy. MRI is<br />

used for improvement <strong>of</strong> all steps in the BT chain, which are: defining<br />

and contouring tumor targets and OAR at time <strong>of</strong> BT; reconstruction<br />

<strong>of</strong> source carriers (applicators/needles/tube/seeds); (pre) treatment<br />

planning optimization; monitoring application/implant quality;<br />

monitoring application/implant stability during treatment; monitoring<br />

regression and deformation during treatment; evaluation <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

outcome (responses, control and related side effects).<br />

MRI does not completely replace clinical investigation and other<br />

imaging modalities, but its superior s<strong>of</strong>t tissue contrast <strong>of</strong>ten helps to<br />

better define target volume extension and tumor stage at time <strong>of</strong><br />

diagnosis, at time <strong>of</strong> BT and for treatment planning purposes. It<br />

facilitates BT in developing volume based treatment planning<br />

concepts comparable to EBRT. One <strong>of</strong> these concepts, for example is<br />

published as GEC ESTRO recommendations for MRI guided gyn BT.<br />

Repeated MRI imaging during and after EBRT helps to individually<br />

determine the amount <strong>of</strong> tumor regression, allowing if necessary<br />

individualized planning <strong>of</strong> the BT boosts. In these cases, but also when<br />

BT is the primary treatment approach, preBT MR information can<br />

influence the choice for applicators, amount <strong>of</strong> needles, tubes or<br />

seeds, their insertion depths and spatial distributions.<br />

During the last years new MR sequences and MR markers have been<br />

developed that provide possibilities for direct source carrier<br />

reconstructions making additional CT scans or Xray investigations<br />

unnecessary. Additionally, MRI allows more detailed monitoring the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> BT applications and implants. Applicator induced<br />

perforations or suboptimal needle insertions for example, can easily<br />

be detected and corrected if necessary and feasible. Repeated MRI<br />

imaging helps to monitor the robustness <strong>of</strong> applications and implants<br />

during treatment. It allows to detect changes in the position <strong>of</strong><br />

applicators/needles/tubes with respect to the targets and OAR and to<br />

recalculate DVH parameters. These changes can occur as inter or<br />

intrafraction variations, can change the dose volume parameters and<br />

can influence treatment outcome. Detection <strong>of</strong> these uncertainties<br />

will help to better understand the relations <strong>of</strong> dose volume<br />

parameters with tumor control and treatment complication<br />

probabilities. Target volume response and control monitoring is also<br />

possible with MRI. In case <strong>of</strong> recurrences it helps to find relations with<br />

spatial dose distributions and treatment field borders. There are<br />

indications that especially functional MRI is valuable in early detection<br />

<strong>of</strong> (recurrent) tumor and focal salvage treatments. Functional MRI<br />

sequences help to better understand differences in tumor biology and<br />

the relations between dose and response in a more individualized<br />

way.<br />

In conclusion, during the last years we see a development towards MR<br />

guided BT in different tumor sites. Anatomical and functional MRI<br />

information supports the different parts <strong>of</strong> the BT chain, helps to<br />

optimize and individualize BT approaches and allows more detailed<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> treatment outcome.<br />

5<br />

MODERN BRACHYTHERAPY: ROLE OF ULTRASOUND<br />

P. Hoskin 1<br />

1<br />

Mount Vernon Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Northwood Middlesex,<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Ultrasound is not a new imaging modality but the recent<br />

developments in image guided brachytherapy have found that<br />

ultrasound is an ideal tool for many <strong>of</strong> the requirements these new<br />

techniques demand. The advantages <strong>of</strong> ultrasound are that it has no<br />

radiation exposure, and it is readily available, portable and can be<br />

used as a real time imaging modality during implantation. Whilst it<br />

may not achieve the levels <strong>of</strong> normal tissue definition, now achieved<br />

with modern CT and MRI, image fusion techniques enable the<br />

advantages <strong>of</strong> ultrasound to be combined with other more<br />

sophisticated imaging techniques.<br />

In brachytherapy ultrasound has a role in prostate, gynaecological and<br />

interstitial brachytherapy at other sites. Developments in ultrasound<br />

were fundamental to the rise in activity seen in prostate<br />

brachytherapy in recent years based on the transrectal ultrasound<br />

guided transperineal implant technique. As the technique has matured<br />

further developments in ultrasound technology with three dimensional<br />

imaging and integration with modern dosimety algorithms which has<br />

been incorporated into routine prostate brachytherapy.<br />

In gynaecological brachytherapy, transabdominal ultrasound provides<br />

excellent imaging <strong>of</strong> the uterus during placement <strong>of</strong> an intrauterine<br />

tube and vaginal sources. This ensures accurate and safe implantation<br />

whilst minimising the risk <strong>of</strong> perforation. In recent years, image<br />

guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer has become established as<br />

the standard <strong>of</strong> care. Whilst the GEC ESTRO recommendations are<br />

based on MR and CT imaging, it has been found that high quality<br />

ultrasound based 3D imaging is equally effective enabling<br />

individualised dosimety to a defined CTV based on ultrasound<br />

appearances fulfilling the GEC ESTRO dose volume requirements.<br />

Interstitial brachytherapy remains an important treatment modality<br />

for many sites including the vagina, vulva, anal canal, rectum and<br />

breast. In these sites ultrasound is again an important imaging<br />

modality enabling accurate placement <strong>of</strong> afterloading catheters with<br />

real time imaging during the implant procedure.<br />

There are continued efforts to improve the technology behind the use<br />

<strong>of</strong> ultrasound and optimisation <strong>of</strong> the imaging parameters is essential.<br />

In prostate brachytherapy use <strong>of</strong> bi plane ultrasound transducers with<br />

transverse and longitudinal modes is now routine and optimal imaging<br />

parameters have been defined to obtain accurate needle insertion<br />

depth with reduced beam width artefacts. The role <strong>of</strong> contrast<br />

agents is also important with studies showing improved accuracy in<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> urethral anatomy using air filled gel. Other new<br />

developments include elastography which may prove beneficial in<br />

indentifying tumour bearing areas distinct from normal prostate gland<br />

based on the tissue stiffness.<br />

Access to high quality ultrasound should be a fundamental component<br />

<strong>of</strong> any brachytherapy programme. It provides high quality real time<br />

imaging resulting in accurate high quality implants which will<br />

translate into good patient outcomes.<br />

6<br />

CONCLUSION IMAGEGUIDED BRACHYTHERAPY FUTURE AND<br />

EVALUATION<br />

J. Dimopoulos 1<br />

1 Metropolitan Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Athens, Greece<br />

During the last two decades there were numerous attempts to<br />

integrate modern imaging (CT, PET, PETCT, MRI, MRS, US) into the<br />

brachytherapy treatment chain. It is evident that advanced imaging<br />

was the driving force for the entire evolution process <strong>of</strong><br />

brachytherapy as it is applied for different sites.<br />

The rationale <strong>of</strong> imageguided brachytherapy was to use images to<br />

define the target <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy prior to any treatment and prior to<br />

the brachytherapy intervention. The placement, with high accuracy,<br />

<strong>of</strong> the brachytherapy applicators (e.g. interstitial needles) was guided<br />

by the acquisition <strong>of</strong> images by either utilizing a “step by step”<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 3<br />

procedure (e.g. CT, MRI) or by utilizing a “real time” approach (e.g.<br />

US). The subsequent aim was to maximize the dose to the targets and<br />

to minimize the dose to any adjacent <strong>org</strong>an at risk. The latter was<br />

realized with the integration <strong>of</strong> images into the treatment planning<br />

procedure. Finally, the generation <strong>of</strong> dosevolume parameters for the<br />

targets and the <strong>org</strong>ans at risk and the correlation <strong>of</strong> these DVH<br />

parameters with measurable clinical outcome parameters enabled the<br />

prediction <strong>of</strong> disease control probability and normal tissue<br />

complication probability.<br />

Ultrasound is the imaging modality <strong>of</strong> choice for the treatment <strong>of</strong><br />

prostate cancer patients with low and high dose rate brachytherapy.<br />

Its unique position has to be ascribed to its capability to provide “real<br />

time” images during the implantation procedure. The development <strong>of</strong><br />

dedicated treatment planning systems supported the exploitation <strong>of</strong><br />

the potential <strong>of</strong> this approach. The development <strong>of</strong> a systematic<br />

methodology and the collection <strong>of</strong> clinical experience with treatment<br />

results on thousands <strong>of</strong> patients established the procedure as the<br />

golden standard.<br />

Recent investigations studied the issue <strong>of</strong> using MR spectroscopy<br />

information for treatment planning <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer brachytherapy.<br />

The aim was to detect the topographic position <strong>of</strong> malignant lesions<br />

within the prostate in order to use this information for dose escalation<br />

purposes. The majority <strong>of</strong> these studies employed 1 H MRS due to the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> efficient water and fatsuppression techniques. It<br />

seems that further improvement regarding signaltonoise ratio with<br />

smaller voxel dimension, improved spatial resolution and more precise<br />

metabolite maps is required. MR spectroscopyguided adaptive<br />

brachytherapy for prostate cancer is however, not widely available<br />

yet and will eventually be used in future studies to evaluate the<br />

clinical advantages <strong>of</strong> this treatment approach.<br />

The integration <strong>of</strong> functional imaging, mainly PET and PETCT, into<br />

the brachytherapy treatment planning procedure was mainly<br />

restricted to patients with cervical cancer. Preliminary data from<br />

dosimetric studies showed that the method is feasible, but its clinical<br />

impact is not yet clearly defined.<br />

MRIguided adaptive brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> cervical cancer represents,<br />

besides USguided brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer, the most<br />

extensively studied imageguided brachytherapy approach. The<br />

method was developed systematically and each <strong>of</strong> the above<br />

mentioned steps <strong>of</strong> imageguidance was carefully integrated into the<br />

procedure. The clinical impact for the patients was remarkable, local<br />

control for locally advanced disease was ~90%, with less than 5%<br />

serious late adverse effects. As a consequence, the procedure was<br />

considered as the golden standard for these patients.<br />

The wide application <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy for accelerated partial breast<br />

irradiation allowed the systematic application <strong>of</strong> CTguidance for<br />

breast brachytherapy. It seems, however, that further research is<br />

needed to clarify some issues regarding the methodology <strong>of</strong> this<br />

approach.<br />

Future clinical studies will have to determine whether the integration<br />

<strong>of</strong> advanced imaging (e.g. biological and functional imaging) into the<br />

different steps <strong>of</strong> the brachytherapy treatment chain as applied for<br />

different sites will result into a significant clinical benefit for the<br />

patient. Until then US and MRI which are widely applicable and<br />

systematically utilized for prostate and cervical cancer, respectively<br />

will represent the golden standard.<br />

<br />

<br />

7<br />

EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE<br />

C. Polgár 1<br />

1 National Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Radiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary<br />

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an attractive treatment<br />

approach which shortens the course <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy (RT) to less than<br />

a week. There has been great interest in Europe in treating selected<br />

patients with earlystage breast cancer with APBI using different<br />

techniques. Among these we review the results <strong>of</strong> European studies<br />

using brachytherapy (BT), and teletherapy techniques. The results <strong>of</strong><br />

clinical trials using intraoperative RT (ELIOT and TARGIT) for<br />

delivering APBI will be presented separately by others.<br />

Six early studies had local recurrence (LR) rates <strong>of</strong> 637% yielding<br />

annual LR rates ranging from 1.4% to 6.2% with 5083% <strong>of</strong> patients<br />

having excellent or good cosmetic results, reflecting suboptimal<br />

patient selection, target definition, and quality assurance procedures<br />

(Table 1.). Twelve more recent studies performed using much more<br />

stringent approaches have had LR rates <strong>of</strong> 011% yielding annual LR<br />

rates ranging from 0% to 1.1% with 56<strong>10</strong>0% <strong>of</strong> patients having<br />

excellent or good cosmetic results (Table 1.).<br />

The <strong>10</strong>year results <strong>of</strong> a singleinstitution phase III study and<br />

preliminary results on early toxicities <strong>of</strong> the GECESTRO multicentric<br />

phase III APBI trial will be presented later during the <strong>World</strong><br />

<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> <strong>Congress</strong>.<br />

Recently, two other European phase III trials (the IMPORT LOW and<br />

the Florence University trials) have been initiated using IMRT in the<br />

APBI arm. As data from these and other trials mature, they will<br />

address and refine issues <strong>of</strong> patient selection, target volume<br />

definition, total dose, and fractionation and hopefully support the<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> APBI into the routine clinical practice.<br />

8<br />

NORTH AMERICAN EXPERIENCE<br />

D.W. Arthur<br />

Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA<br />

The North American accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI)<br />

experience will be represented in this presentation by review <strong>of</strong><br />

select prospective single institutional, multiinstitutional and<br />

randomized studies. In addition, clinical investigations evaluating how<br />

to expand and improve the present use <strong>of</strong> APBI will be discussed.<br />

Outcome data from William Beaumont Hospital, Virginia<br />

Commonwealth University, RTOG and the American Society <strong>of</strong> Breast<br />

Surgeons Registry trial, all now with extended followup <strong>of</strong> 5<strong>12</strong> years,<br />

continue to support the use <strong>of</strong> APBI in selected patients. Acceptable<br />

inbreast control and toxicity rate are reported from these trials and<br />

lay the foundation for the use <strong>of</strong> APBI. To further validate the use <strong>of</strong><br />

APBI, the results <strong>of</strong> two large phase III randomized trials are awaited.<br />

The Canadian trial randomized between standard whole breast and<br />

3Dconformal external beam partial breast has completed accrual and<br />

data maturation is awaited. The American NSABP B39/RTOG 0413<br />

trial continues to accrue and is approaching anticipated conclusion in<br />

early 2013. This phase III trial has included a wide range <strong>of</strong> patients<br />

who have been randomized between standard whole breast irradiation<br />

and APBI that can be delivered with mulitcatheter interstitial<br />

technique, intracavitary technique or 3DConformal external beam<br />

radiotherapy. It is the only phase III trial that is evaluating the<br />

boundaries <strong>of</strong> patient selection. As these important trials come to a<br />

close and we await results, further acceleration <strong>of</strong> treatment delivery


S4 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

and the use <strong>of</strong> partial breast treatment for reirradiation are being<br />

investigated. Two ongoing trials that are evaluating these concepts<br />

will be presented. A multiinstitutional trial investigating a twoday<br />

treatment delivery scheme has become the focus <strong>of</strong> study allowing<br />

the APBI treatment device to be inplace for only 23 days and an<br />

RTOG trial is evaluating the role <strong>of</strong> partial breast reirradiation in<br />

those patients experiencing an inbreast failure after whole breast<br />

irradiation.<br />

9<br />

TARGIT<br />

D.J. Joseph 1<br />

1 Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Perth, Australia<br />

: After breastconserving surgery (BCS), 90% <strong>of</strong> local<br />

recurrences (LR) occur within the index quadrant despite the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> multicentric cancers elsewhere in the breast. Thus,<br />

restriction <strong>of</strong> radiation therapy to the tumour bed during surgery<br />

might be adequate for selected patients. We compared targeted<br />

intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) utilizing the Intrabeam Device,<br />

with conventional whole breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).<br />

IORT involves an xray source small enough to be placed inside a<br />

tumour bed to deliver its treatment. A series <strong>of</strong> applicators <strong>of</strong> varying<br />

diameters allows the correct size to be chosen for any surgical cavity<br />

after BCS. Low energy 50 kilovolt xrays are produced which have<br />

limited penetration, so deliver a dose that is relatively high at the<br />

applicator surface but falls <strong>of</strong>f rapidly with distance. We prescribe a<br />

dose <strong>of</strong> 20Gy at the applicator surface, given in a single treatment.<br />

The procedure lengthens theatre time by 2030 minutes, but<br />

otherwise there are few logistical issues.<br />

: Having safely piloted the technique <strong>of</strong> IORT, Sir Charles<br />

Gairdner Hospital (SCGH) and the Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute<br />

joined the international TARGITA trial in 2003. In this prospective,<br />

randomised, noninferiority trial, women aged 45 years or older with<br />

invasive ductal breast carcinoma undergoing BCS were enrolled from<br />

28 centres in nine countries. Participating centres were able to define<br />

stricter eligibility criteria, and the two Australian centres chose to<br />

include only postmenopausal women over 50 due to their lower risk<br />

<strong>of</strong> LR. Patients were randomly assigned to receive targeted IORT or<br />

EBRT. Postoperative discovery <strong>of</strong> predefined factors (eg, lobular<br />

carcinoma) could trigger addition <strong>of</strong> EBRT to IORT (in an expected 15%<br />

<strong>of</strong> patients). The primary outcome was LR in the conserved breast.<br />

The predefined noninferiority margin was an absolute difference <strong>of</strong><br />

2 5% in the primary endpoint.<br />

: 387 patients have been registered on the trial in Australia.<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> the first 1113 patients randomly allocated to IORT and<br />

1119 allocated to EBRT was performed in early 20<strong>10</strong>. Of 996 patients<br />

who received the allocated treatment in the IORT group, 854 (86%)<br />

received IORT only and 142 (14%) received IORT plus EBRT. <strong>10</strong>25 (92%)<br />

patients in the EBRT group received the allocated treatment. At 4<br />

years, there were six LRs in the IORT group and five in the EBRT<br />

group. The KaplanMeier estimate <strong>of</strong> LR in the conserved breast at 4<br />

years was 1 20% (95% CI 0 53–2 71) in the IORT group and 0 95% (0 39–<br />

2 31) in the EBRT group. The frequency <strong>of</strong> any complications and<br />

major toxicity was similar in the two groups. Radiotherapy toxicity<br />

(Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 3) was lower in the IORT<br />

group (six patients [0 5%]) than in the EBRT group (23 patients [2 1%];<br />

p=0 002). Recent blinded analysis has shown no significant change in<br />

LR for the total cohort. A further unblinded analysis is planned for<br />

late 20<strong>12</strong>. Recruitment is ongoing as it was continued beyond the<br />

initial target to allow further centres to join the trial. Long term<br />

followup is planned.<br />

: In accordance to ASCO literature and discussion with<br />

the data monitoring and safety committee and local specialists, IORT<br />

is now considered a standard treatment option for women over 70<br />

with low risk disease in Western Australia.<br />

<strong>10</strong><br />

ELIOT TRIALS IN MILAN: RESULTS<br />

R.Orecchia<br />

European Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Milan, Italy<br />

Abstract not received<br />

11<br />

LONG TERM RESULTS AND ONGOING TRIALS OF PERMANENT BREAST<br />

SEED IMPLANT<br />

J. Pignol 1 , S. Doggett 2 , J. Crook 3 , M. Trombetta 4 , J.M. Caudrelier 5 , P.<br />

Fried 6 , S. Hussein 7 , A. Dagnault 8 , N. Pervez 9 , W. Sauerwein <strong>10</strong><br />

1<br />

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre University <strong>of</strong> Toronto, Radiation<br />

Oncology, Toronto, Canada<br />

2<br />

Tustin Hospital and Medical Centre, Radiation Oncology, Tustin, USA<br />

3<br />

BCCA Center for the Southern Interior University <strong>of</strong> British<br />

Columbia, Radiation Oncology, Kelowna, Canada<br />

4<br />

Allegheny General Hospital Temple University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine,<br />

Radiation Oncology, Pittsburgh, USA<br />

5<br />

Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre University <strong>of</strong> Ottawa, Radiation<br />

Oncology, Ottawa, Canada<br />

6<br />

The Jewish Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Cincinnati, USA<br />

7<br />

Tom Baker Cancer Centre University <strong>of</strong> Calgary, Radiation Oncology,<br />

Calgary, Canada<br />

8<br />

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec, Radiation Oncology,<br />

Quebec, Canada<br />

9<br />

Cross Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, Edmonton, Canada<br />

<strong>10</strong><br />

University Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Essen, Germany<br />

Permanent Breast Seeds Implant (PBSI) is a form <strong>of</strong> partial breast<br />

irradiation technique involving the permanent implantation <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong>3 Pd<br />

stranded seeds under ultrasound guidance and light anaesthesia in a<br />

single one hour procedure. PBSI delivers the radiation treatment over<br />

several weeks and is hence low dose rate brachytherapy.<br />

The technique has been prospectively tested in a Phase I/II clinical<br />

trial. From 2004 to 2007, early stage breast cancer patients referred<br />

to a single cancer centre for adjuvant radiotherapy were <strong>of</strong>fered PBSI.<br />

Eligible patients included those over 45 years old diagnosed with an<br />

infiltrating ductal carcinoma £ 3 cm, margins ≥ 2 mm, no grade III, no<br />

lobular components, no extensive in situ carcinoma, no<br />

lymphovascular invasion, and negative lymph nodes. In 2009, when<br />

mature data showed good tolerance and the absence <strong>of</strong> local<br />

recurrence at 5 years, a multicentre registry trial was activated<br />

<strong>of</strong>fering PBSI to the same population but aged 50 or higher. Finally in<br />

20<strong>10</strong> a multicentre Phase II trial <strong>of</strong> adjuvant PBSI for selected DCIS<br />

was activated in Canada.<br />

Overall 111 patients have received PBSI, including 98 with infiltrating<br />

ductal carcinoma (IDC), one patient with mixed infiltrating lobular<br />

and ductal carcinoma, and <strong>12</strong> patients with DCIS. The median age at<br />

time <strong>of</strong> surgery was 61 years [range 41 to 80 years]. The median<br />

tumour size was 1.0 cm [0.2 to 3.0 cm]. Regarding the 99 patients<br />

with invasive tumour, all were node negative but one, the median<br />

free surgical margin size was 5 mm [1 to 40 mm], half <strong>of</strong> the tumour<br />

were MSBR grade I and the other half were grade II, 83/99 patients<br />

received adjuvant antihormone therapy and <strong>12</strong>/99 chemotherapy.<br />

The median followup for the entire cohort is 62 months [5 to 98<br />

months]. At 80 months the overall survival is 97.3% ± STD 1.9%, and<br />

the recurrence free survival was 91.9% ± STD 3.9%. Three patients<br />

presented with ipsilateral breast recurrence; two IDC at 5.5 and 7<br />

years and one DCIS at 6.5 years post surgery. Three patients also<br />

presented with contralateral breast cancers, two IDC and one DCIS.<br />

The single patient with a positive node developed a regional<br />

recurrence at 6 years, and one patient presented with lung metastasis<br />

after 4 years. Two patients died <strong>of</strong> diabetic complications unrelated<br />

to the implant?. Two year tolerance data are available for 78 patients<br />

and none presented with a toxicity <strong>of</strong> grade II ( NIH CTCAE 4.0; local<br />

intervention required and/or limiting instrumental activity <strong>of</strong> daily<br />

life) or higher. Twenty four patients presented with grade I side<br />

effects (30%) including grade I telangiectasia in fourteen patients<br />

(18%) and induration in eleven patients (14%). Fifty four patients are<br />

showing no or minimal evidence <strong>of</strong> radiation treatment. Reviewing<br />

postimplant quality assurance data, telangiectasia appears to be<br />

preventable if the skin receives less than 85% <strong>of</strong> the prescribed dose.<br />

Finally PBSI is associated with a rate <strong>of</strong> 96.9% good or excellent<br />

cosmetic results at 3 years.<br />

These limited data compare favourably with external beam adjuvant<br />

radiotherapy for early stage breast cancers and other techniques <strong>of</strong><br />

partial breast irradiation. PBSI present the advantage to be realised in<br />

a single outpatient procedure compared to 5 to 6 days for HDR<br />

brachytherapy. Also using a low energy source, the faster dose fall <strong>of</strong>f<br />

enable a dramatic total body dose reduction especially regarding<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 5<br />

heart and lung exposures. As <strong>of</strong> February 20<strong>12</strong> the PBSI technique is<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered in three centres in North America, two additional centres<br />

have obtained IRB approval for the Registry study, and IRB approval is<br />

pending for five centres. In <strong>May</strong> 2011 the FDA approved an<br />

implantation device and a treatment planning system enabling PBSI.<br />

<br />

<br />

<strong>12</strong><br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

C. HaieMeder 1<br />

1 Institut Gustave Roussy, Radiation Oncology, Villejuif, France<br />

Carlos A. Perez is an outstanding internationally recognized radiation<br />

oncologist. He was born in Medellin, Colombia and earned his medical<br />

degree at the University <strong>of</strong> Antioquia School <strong>of</strong> Medicine in<br />

1960.Carlos Perez came to the United States at Washington University<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Medicine. He spent three years as a radiation oncology<br />

resident at Mallinckrodt Institute <strong>of</strong> Radiology in SaintLouis Missouri<br />

and a oneyear fellowship in radiotherapy at M.D. Anderson Hospital<br />

and Tumor Institute in Houston Texas. He then returned to<br />

Mallinckrodt as an instructor in radiology.<br />

In 1966 Carlos Perez initiated a program for the specific training <strong>of</strong><br />

radiation therapy technologists.<br />

Carlos Perez was named a pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> radiology in 1972. In 1976 he<br />

became the director <strong>of</strong> the Radiation Oncology Center, at Mallinckrodt<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Radiology. Under his leadership, the Radiation Oncology<br />

Center developed a strong research with significant contributions to<br />

cancer treatment, with the enhancement <strong>of</strong> radiation effects with<br />

concomitant chemotherapy. In 2001 Carlos Perez assumed the first<br />

chairmanship <strong>of</strong> the Center which became a separate academic<br />

department <strong>of</strong> the Washington University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine. Carlos<br />

Perez held this position until2004.<br />

Since 2004 Carlos Perez is a Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Emeritus. He also served as the<br />

President <strong>of</strong> the American Society <strong>of</strong> Therapeutic Radiation in 1982.<br />

He is well known for his major contributions to the clinical<br />

management <strong>of</strong> patients, especially those with gynecologic tumors<br />

and carcinoma <strong>of</strong> the prostate and <strong>of</strong> the breast. His contribution in<br />

the brachytherapy field has been very important, especially in<br />

patients with gynecological cancers. Carlos Perez has been motivated<br />

by understanding the disease as well as the psychological care <strong>of</strong> his<br />

patients. Heis a c<strong>of</strong>ounder <strong>of</strong> the Cancer Information Center (CIC),<br />

the first United States resource facility that provided medical<br />

information, resources and emotional support to cancer patients.<br />

He is the recipient <strong>of</strong> many honors. He was awarded the ESTRO<br />

Honorary Member at the 30 th ESTRO anniversary in London in 2011,<br />

CRILA Gold Medal in 2000, the Gold Medal <strong>of</strong> the American College <strong>of</strong><br />

Radiology in 1997, and the Gold Medal <strong>of</strong> the American Society for<br />

Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology in 1982.<br />

Carlos Perez has published over 300 scientific articles, a lot <strong>of</strong> them<br />

dealing with brachytherapy. He is coeditor <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

comprehensive text on radiation oncology, Principles and Practice <strong>of</strong><br />

Radiation Oncology, now in its sixth edition. In addition, he is co<br />

editor <strong>of</strong> two other outstanding textbooks – Principles and Practice <strong>of</strong><br />

Gynecologic Oncology and Radiation Oncology: Management Decisions.<br />

On behalf <strong>of</strong> GECESTRO, ABS and all brachytherapy societies, it is a<br />

great honor and a great pleasure to award Carlos Perez the GEC<br />

ESTRO Marie Curie medal during the 4 th world brachytherapy meeting<br />

in Barcelona.<br />

13<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY IN CANCER: ART AND SCIENCE ACCOMPLISHMENTS<br />

IN OVER A CENTURY<br />

C. Perez 1<br />

1<br />

Washington University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, St. Louis,<br />

USA<br />

<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> has been used in the treatment <strong>of</strong> patients with a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> malignant lesions since the turn <strong>of</strong> the XX century, shortly<br />

after the discovery <strong>of</strong> radioactivity by Marie and Pierre Curie and<br />

Antoine Henri Becquerel, recognized by the Nobel Prize in Physics,<br />

bestowed to the three <strong>of</strong> them in 1903. Initially, and for many years<br />

brachytherapy was more <strong>of</strong> an Art: 226Ra needles or sources in<br />

rudimentary applicators (cylinders) 'were inserted in the tumor and<br />

dose prescription was empirical'. Pioneers in Radiation Oncology<br />

designed applicators to achieve better dose distributions. Afterloading<br />

devices with selective shielding, and flexible catheters, initially<br />

loaded manually and later through remote devices provided welcome<br />

radiation safety protection.<br />

Our colleagues in Physics established dosimetry procedures and rules<br />

to more accurately determine radiation doses (Patterson Parker,<br />

Quimby, the Paris dosimetry methodology). 226Ra has been replaced<br />

by other radionuclides with more appealing physical characteristics<br />

(energy, specific radioactivity, half life, etc) and safety for the<br />

patients and the operator, such as 137Cs, 192Ir, 169Yb, 241Am and<br />

others.<br />

Innovative technology has advanced brachytherapy into more<br />

scientific grounds. Sophisticated computational methods and imaging<br />

(ultrasound, CT scanning, etc) enhanced our ability to do more<br />

precise 3D treatment planning and increased our capabilities for<br />

dosimetry verification. Recently MRI and PET scanning have allowed<br />

precise identification <strong>of</strong> target volumes and rapid imaging plus robust<br />

computational techniques have made it possible to carry out real time<br />

imageguided 3D/4D volumetric dose optimization (inappropriately<br />

called 'dose painting', which would apply to a surface).<br />

Radiation Biology investigation has also contributed to advance the<br />

scientific basis <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy. With better understanding <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cellular kinetics and the acute and late effects <strong>of</strong> radiation in normal<br />

tissues it was possible to introduce different dose rate devices into<br />

clinical practice, and in many countries the traditional Low Dose Rate<br />

(LDR) has been progressively replaced by Mid or High Dose Rate (MDR,<br />

HDR) techniques, with substantial reduction in cost <strong>of</strong> treatment and<br />

improved radiation safety for providers and patients. Pulsed Dose Rate<br />

combines the technological advantages <strong>of</strong> HDR with the biological<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> LDR. Recently low keV xray electronic brachytherapy<br />

systems have been introduced, with specific applications, such as<br />

partial breast irradiation.<br />

These modalities , combined with sophisticated treatment planning<br />

algorithms, enhance the flexibility for 3D dose modulation and<br />

optimization, by manipulating source dwelling times and patterns.<br />

Relativedosehomogeneity Index, Dose nonuniformity Ratio and<br />

Conformality Index are tools quite useful to achieve dose<br />

optimization. Modern brachytherapy represents in many respects a<br />

classic mode <strong>of</strong> conformational adaptive radiation therapy. Cloud<br />

computing will facilitate realtime planning and dose optimization,<br />

enhancing the precision in dose delivery. Whereas brachytherapy<br />

continues to be a mainstay in the treatment <strong>of</strong> carcinoma <strong>of</strong> the<br />

uterine cervix and other gynecological tumors, there has been a major<br />

increase in the application <strong>of</strong> permanent seed implants (<strong>12</strong>5I, <strong>10</strong>3Pa)<br />

or HDR in the treatment <strong>of</strong> patients with prostate cancer, with results<br />

equivalent to radical prostatectomy or advanced external beam


S6 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

techniques. On the other hand, a reduction in the use <strong>of</strong><br />

brachytherapy in the treatment <strong>of</strong> patients with cancer <strong>of</strong> the head<br />

and neck has taken place. Breast brachytherapy has been reenacted<br />

with the introduction <strong>of</strong> accelerated partial breast irradiation, the<br />

efficacy and safety <strong>of</strong> which is being tested in several clinical trials.<br />

As in any aspect <strong>of</strong> radiation therapy, quality assurance, safety,<br />

protection and compliance with all regulatory requirements are<br />

critical to the appropriate use <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy.<br />

There is a critical need to emphasize the teaching <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy in<br />

Radiation Oncology Residency programs and to foster prospective<br />

clinical trials to expand its role in the management <strong>of</strong> many patients<br />

with cancer.<br />

<br />

<br />

14<br />

UNDERSTANDING THE PATHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF PROSTATE CANCER<br />

AS A FOUNDATION FOR FOCAL TARGETED BT<br />

D. Bostwick 1<br />

1 Bostwick Laboratories, Research, Glen Allen, USA<br />

: Focal therapy is emerging as a reasonable clinical<br />

compromise treatment for select men with early stage prostate<br />

cancer between definitive therapy (potential overtreatment with<br />

morbidity) and active surveillance (potential undertreatment). This<br />

report examines the pathological features from biopsies that assist in<br />

guiding patient selection for this novel form <strong>of</strong> therapy.<br />

: We undertook a systematic literature review to determine<br />

(1) What are the limitations <strong>of</strong> transrectal and transperineal biopsy<br />

protocols; and (2) How accurately can we define and predict<br />

pathologic selection factors prior to therapy such as final grade,<br />

volume, unifocality, unilaterality, and stage (extent) for the<br />

individual patient?<br />

: Significant variance exists in practice by pathologists and<br />

urologists that results in differences in cancer yield on biopsies.<br />

Transperineal sector or mapping biopsies appears to be a safe<br />

alternative to transrectal biopsies that can more accurately grade<br />

(undergraded in <strong>10</strong>% or more <strong>of</strong> patients with transrectal biopsies),<br />

stage (understaged in 25% or more <strong>of</strong> patients with transrectal biopsy)<br />

and sample (in up to 20% <strong>of</strong> patients with transrectal biopsy, the<br />

index cancer may not be the determinant <strong>of</strong> behavior).<br />

: Not all prostate biopsies are created (or handled)<br />

equally. The quality and method <strong>of</strong> biopsy has a significant impact on<br />

cancer yield as well as pathologic selection factors for focal therapy<br />

such as cancer grade, volume, unifocality, unilaterality, and stage<br />

(extent). Transperineal sector or mapping biopsies appear to be<br />

superior to transrectal biopsies for patient selection for focal<br />

brachytherapy.<br />

15<br />

PRIMARY FOCAL THERAPY OF PROSTATE CANCER: ROLE OF DIAGNOSTIC<br />

IMAGING<br />

F.V. Coakley 1<br />

1<br />

UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center, Radiology and Urology, San<br />

Francisco, USA<br />

: Focal therapy <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer represents an entirely<br />

new paradigm for the management <strong>of</strong> this disease, <strong>of</strong>fering a novel<br />

'middle way' between the nihilistic approach <strong>of</strong> active surveillance and<br />

the morbid approach <strong>of</strong> traditional definitive treatment with radical<br />

prostatectomy or radiation. While conceptually attractive, widespread<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> focal therapy for prostate cancer will require accurate<br />

identification <strong>of</strong> appropriate patients, credible pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> longterm<br />

efficacy, and precise and effective tumor targeting and ablation.<br />

Imaging is likely to play a central role in many important aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

focal therapy for prostate cancer, including patient selection, tumor<br />

localization, and outcome evaluation.<br />

: Prostate cancer represents<br />

an <strong>org</strong>an and a disease that is difficult to image locally. A a<br />

substantial body <strong>of</strong> evidence has emerged in the last two decades to<br />

indicates that multiparametric MRI, while not a perfect approach,<br />

represents the best available method for local imaging <strong>of</strong> this<br />

condition. Multiparametric MRI refers to standard T2 weighted MR<br />

imaging with the addition <strong>of</strong> some combination <strong>of</strong> diffusion, perfusion,<br />

or spectroscopic MR imaging. Prostate cancer is characterized by low<br />

T2 signal intensity, restricted diffusion, rapid intense enhancement<br />

with washout, and elevated choline to citrate ratio. The optimal<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> these parameters for prostate cancer detection and<br />

characterization is currently unknown and remains under<br />

investigation.<br />

: Multiparametric MRI has been<br />

shown to improve tumor targeting prior to focal therapy. In<br />

particular, a visible lesion and T2weighted imaging associated with at<br />

least 0.54 cm³ <strong>of</strong> spectroscopic abnormality is likely to represent a<br />

dominant (greater than 0.5 cm³) treatable focus <strong>of</strong> disease.<br />

Preliminary data from our institution suggests that a noncapsular<br />

margin <strong>of</strong> 5 mm results in adequate tumor coverage <strong>of</strong> such treatable<br />

foci <strong>of</strong> disease.<br />

: Prostate cancer progression, as evaluated by<br />

serial multiparametric MRI is correlated with PSA progression,<br />

suggesting that this modality could be used to follow disease being<br />

managed by active surveillance or focal therapy. Serial multi<br />

parametric MRI studies have also demonstrated that prostate cancer<br />

usually recurs within the gland at the same location as the dominant<br />

primary tumor. This is a critical observation, since focal therapy only<br />

makes conceptual sense if treatment failure is a manifestation <strong>of</strong><br />

inadequate local control at the site <strong>of</strong> initial dominant disease.<br />

MR guided high intensity focus ultrasound (HIFU) : MR guided HIFU<br />

<strong>of</strong>fers several major advantages as a method <strong>of</strong> tumor ablation,<br />

including precise targeting, accurate thermometry for realtime<br />

monitoring during ablation, and tumor treatment within a stereotactic<br />

environment. Animal and early human studies are encouraging.<br />

However, additional research will be required to validate this<br />

technology before it can enter routine clinical practice.<br />

: Focal therapy has the potential to <strong>of</strong>fer a new<br />

therapeutic option to the management <strong>of</strong> patients with prostate<br />

cancer; imaging with multiparametric MRI is likely to be <strong>of</strong> major<br />

importance in allowing focal therapy to achieve its full promise in the<br />

care <strong>of</strong> these patients.<br />

16<br />

TECHNICAL POSSIBILITIES OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRIMARY FOCAL<br />

THERAPY OF PROSTATE CANCER<br />

G. Kovács 1 , A. Schlaefer 2<br />

1<br />

Universität Lübeck, Interdisciplinary <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> Unit, Lübeck,<br />

Germany<br />

2<br />

Universität Lübeck, Institute <strong>of</strong> Robotics and Cognitive Systems,<br />

Lübeck, Germany<br />

: Considering the potential morbidity <strong>of</strong> radical therapy<br />

(prostatectomy, radiation therapy) there are an increasing number <strong>of</strong><br />

critics who argue that lowrisk prostate cancer is currently being<br />

overtreated. Focal therapy is different from a whole gland treatment:<br />

focal means to not target bladder, sphincter, neurovascular bundles,<br />

and bowel and should spare continence, erectile function, and overall<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> life. Because <strong>of</strong> similarities between prostate cancer and<br />

breast cancer, the procedure may be called as the 'lumpectomy' <strong>of</strong><br />

the man. This growing segment has led to increased interest in less<br />

aggressive strategies and treatment options. Several developments in<br />

urology (vascular targeted photodynamic therapy –VTP, focal<br />

cryoablation, focal electroporation, highintensity focal ultrasound –<br />

HIFU, etc.) <strong>of</strong>fer the tool <strong>of</strong> partial prostate gland treatments and<br />

prospective clinical investigations are already underway.<br />

: The pool <strong>of</strong> different modern radiotherapy<br />

options (intensity modulated radiotherapy IMRT, image guided<br />

radiotherapy IGRT, simultaneous integrated boost SIB, robotic<br />

radiotherapyCK, as well as seed & HDR brachytherapy techniques)<br />

were analyzed in order to prove the potential <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy in<br />

primary partial prostate therapy. These different forms <strong>of</strong> radiation<br />

techniques are compared to each other in terms <strong>of</strong> accuracy <strong>of</strong> target<br />

definition, <strong>of</strong> inter and intrafraction movements, <strong>of</strong> possibility the<br />

target dose painting, as well as <strong>of</strong> low dose volumes, <strong>of</strong> dose on<br />

<strong>org</strong>ans at risk and <strong>of</strong> invasivity. The potential <strong>of</strong> new technical<br />

developments like the use <strong>of</strong> interstitial tissue separators is discussed.<br />

In brachytherapy technology (LDR, HDR or PDR) the potential <strong>of</strong><br />

developing focal imaging needles using optical coherence tomography<br />

and a robotic needle drivers will be highlighted.<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 7<br />

: Modern radiotherapy especially interstitial brachytherapy and<br />

Cyber Knife technology (Figure 1) combined with interstitial tissue<br />

separators between prostate and rectum have the technical potential<br />

for successfully performance <strong>of</strong> partial prostate treatments with<br />

cancer ablative dose levels. However, following the actual discussion<br />

in the urological community regarding definition and diagnosis <strong>of</strong> a<br />

prostate focal lesion which results in difficulties in target definition<br />

for radiotherapy, further clinical work and interdisciplinary consensus<br />

is needed to define standard procedures for partial treatments in<br />

localized prostate cancer.<br />

: Following an interdisciplinary consensus on target<br />

definition for radiotherapy, prospective and controlled multicentric<br />

investigations are needed to define the potential and feasibility <strong>of</strong><br />

radiotherapy in partial prostate treatments.<br />

Figure 1<br />

Potential <strong>of</strong> different radiotherapy technologies in partial prostate<br />

cancer treatment<br />

*better with the use <strong>of</strong> image fusion<br />

17<br />

IS THERE A ROLE FOR FOCAL THERAPY IN PROSTATE CANCER NON<br />

RADIATION TECHNIQUES?<br />

T. de Reijke<br />

Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands<br />

Due to widespread use <strong>of</strong> PSA, urologists face an increasing number <strong>of</strong><br />

patients with small volume, low grade prostatic carcinoma seeking for<br />

the optimal therapeutic approach. Concerns about overdiagnosis <strong>of</strong><br />

prostate cancer and consequently overtreatment <strong>of</strong> clinically<br />

insignificant tumours in combination with the significant morbidity<br />

that traditional therapies carry, have questioned the need for radical<br />

treatments for selected groups <strong>of</strong> patients with lowrisk cancer.<br />

Recently, due to technological advances, focal therapy has been<br />

developed to optimize control while minimizing the adverse <strong>events</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

whole gland therapy and the anxiety associated with delayed<br />

treatment.<br />

The concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>org</strong>an sparing treatment has proven its efficacy for<br />

selected tumors <strong>of</strong> the breast, skin, bladder and kidney. Four<br />

modalities appear to have the most clinical promise for prostate<br />

cancer focal therapy, including high intensity focused ultrasound<br />

(HIFU), cryotherapy, radiation therapy and photodynamic therapy<br />

(PDT). Several approaches can be found including local application <strong>of</strong><br />

therapy to a specific focus, ablation <strong>of</strong> onehalf <strong>of</strong> the prostate<br />

(hemiablation) and ablation <strong>of</strong> nearly the entire prostate (neartotal<br />

ablation).<br />

Cryotherapy has a "freeze rupture" mode <strong>of</strong> action. leading to necrosis<br />

and vascular thrombosis using TRUS or MRI and is the best studied<br />

focal therapy option. HIFU induces a thermal protein denaturation and<br />

coagulative necrosis and uses either TRUS or MRI and only some<br />

feasibility studies have been reported. PDT ha a light activated,<br />

oxygendependent cytotoxic and vasculotoxic mode <strong>of</strong> action using<br />

also TRUS or MRI and only Phase I/II studies have been reported.<br />

The problem with these focal techniques is a lack <strong>of</strong> standardized<br />

followup protocols for patients with focal therapy. As a variable<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> prostate tissue is left untreated in focal therapy, absolute<br />

values <strong>of</strong> PSA will be insufficient for verifying and monitoring<br />

treatment success. The position <strong>of</strong> followup biopsies should be<br />

determined, in addition, MRI/MRS may identify the lesion created by<br />

ablation and may have a potential in followup<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

18<br />

20 EURAMET PROJECT: NEW CALIBRATION STANDARDS IN BRACHY<br />

THERAPY<br />

T. Sander 1 , M.P. Toni 2 , I. AubineauLanièce 3 , J. de Pooter 4 , A.S.<br />

Guerra 2 , T. Schneider 5 , H.J. Selbach 5<br />

1<br />

National Physical Laboratory (NPL), Radiation Dosimetry,<br />

Teddington, United Kingdom<br />

2<br />

Istituto Nazionale di Metrologia delle Radiazioni Ionizzanti (ENEA<br />

INMRI), Radiation Dosimetry, Rome, Italy<br />

3<br />

Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (LNELNHB), Radiation<br />

Dosimetry, GifsurYvette, France<br />

4<br />

Van Swinden Laboratorium (VSL), Radiation Dosimetry, Delft, The<br />

Netherlands<br />

5<br />

PhysikalischTechnische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Radiation Dosimetry,<br />

Braunschweig, Germany<br />

<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> dosimetry for gamma ray sources is currently based on<br />

source calibrations in terms <strong>of</strong> reference air kerma rate (RAKR) or air<br />

kerma strength (AKS). However, the quantity <strong>of</strong> interest is the<br />

absorbed dose rate to water at a distance <strong>of</strong> 1 cm from the source<br />

centre (DRw,1cm), which is currently calculated from RAKR or AKS by<br />

applying the AAPM Task Group 43 formalism [1,2]. As for external<br />

beam radiotherapy dosimetry, there is now growing need for accurate<br />

brachytherapy source dosimetry traceable to national absorbed dose<br />

primary standards.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the aims <strong>of</strong> the project “T2.J06, Increasing cancer treatment<br />

efficacy using 3D brachytherapy” (a joint research project within the<br />

European Association <strong>of</strong> National Metrology Institutes, EURAMET e. V.)<br />

was the development <strong>of</strong> absorbed dose standards which would allow<br />

more direct calibrations <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy sources in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

absorbed dose rate to water at a distance <strong>of</strong> 1 cm, DRw,1cm , compared<br />

to the current air kermabased calibration method, where DRw,1cm is<br />

determined as the product <strong>of</strong> the measured air kerma strength and<br />

the dose rate constant, Λ, resulting in overall standard uncertainties<br />

<strong>of</strong> around 5%.<br />

Of the ten European National Metrology Institutes, which contributed<br />

to the joint research project T2.J06 between July 2008 and June<br />

2011, five developed a total <strong>of</strong> seven independent absorbed dose to<br />

water primary standards for brachytherapy. Three standards, based<br />

on ionometry, were developed for low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy<br />

sources and four standards, based on either water or graphite<br />

calorimetry, were developed for the measurement <strong>of</strong> high dose rate<br />

(HDR) brachytherapy sources. The objective was to measure DRw,1cm<br />

with an overall uncertainty <strong>of</strong> less than 2% (with a coverage factor <strong>of</strong><br />

k = 1, which is equivalent to one standard deviation).<br />

The presentation will describe the design <strong>of</strong> the new absorbed dose<br />

standards and summarise the results <strong>of</strong> DRw,1cm measurements made<br />

with LDR <strong>12</strong>5 I and HDR 192 Ir brachytherapy sources. The same<br />

brachytherapy sources were also measured with existing air kerma<br />

standards in terms <strong>of</strong> reference air kerma rate. Combining both<br />

measurements yielded experimentally determined dose rate constants<br />

for different brachytherapy source types with standard uncertainties<br />

<strong>of</strong> less than 2.6% for LDR sources and standard uncertainties <strong>of</strong> less<br />

than 2% for HDR sources. This is a significant improvement compared<br />

to the 5% standard uncertainty currently achievable with<br />

measurements based on thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). The<br />

measured dose rate constants compared well with published<br />

consensus values [3] within the stated uncertainties.<br />

Both LDR and HDR brachytherapy sources can now be calibrated more<br />

directly in terms <strong>of</strong> absorbed dose rate to water and traceable to<br />

primary standards. Improvements in the accuracy <strong>of</strong> absorbed dose<br />

rate measurements and treatment delivery result in higher survival<br />

rates and better quality <strong>of</strong> life for cancer patients.<br />

References<br />

[1] Nath R, Anderson L L, Luxton G, Weaver K A, Williamson J F and<br />

Meigooni A S, Dosimetry <strong>of</strong> interstitial brachytherapy sources:


S8 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Recommendations <strong>of</strong> the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task<br />

Group No. 43. Med. Phys. 22 (1995), 209234<br />

[2] Rivard M J, Coursey B M, DeWerd L A, Hanson W F, Saiful Huq M,<br />

Ibbott G S, Mitch M G, Nath R and Williamson J F, Update <strong>of</strong> AAPM<br />

Task Group No. 43 Report: A revised AAPM protocol for brachytherapy<br />

dose calculations, Med. Phys. 31 (2004), 633674<br />

[3] ESTRO European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology,<br />

http://www.estro.<strong>org</strong>/estroactivities/Pages/TG43BTDOSMETRICPARA<br />

METERS.aspx (accessed 23 January 20<strong>12</strong>)<br />

19<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY CALIBRATION STANDARDS IN THE USA<br />

L. De Werd 1<br />

1 University <strong>of</strong> Winsconsin, <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Madison, USA<br />

<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> sources in the USA are characterized by the dosimetric<br />

quantity known as the air kerma strength. The division <strong>of</strong> the<br />

standards is along the line <strong>of</strong> energy and dose rate. For example, Low<br />

Dose Rate (LDR) sources at low energy are calibrated using the Wide<br />

Angle Free Air Chamber (WAFAC). A description <strong>of</strong> the primary<br />

standard and the transfer to the Accredited Dosimetry Calibration<br />

Laboratories (ADCL) will be described. This standard is then<br />

transferred to the clinical physicist. A summary <strong>of</strong> this process will be<br />

given. The High Dose Rate (HDR) highenergy sources are calibrated<br />

with the “7 distance technique.” A comparison <strong>of</strong> the various sources<br />

on the market will be described and their comparison will be given.<br />

The air kerma strength for each <strong>of</strong> the sources is within 1% <strong>of</strong> each<br />

other. This standard is also transferred to the clinic via a well<br />

ionization chamber. Finally, the calibration standard related to a HDR<br />

low energy xray source will be described. Each <strong>of</strong> these sources is<br />

traceable to a primary standard with data obtained for the last 20<br />

years.<br />

20<br />

RAMIFICATIONS OF DOSERATE TO WATER CALIBRATIONS ON CLINICAL<br />

DOSIMETRY FOR PHOTONEMITTING BRACHYTHERAPY SOURCES<br />

M.J. Rivard 1 , F.A. Siebert 2 , J.L.M. Venselaar 3 , L.A. DeWerd 4<br />

1<br />

Tufts University, Radiation Oncology, Boston, USA<br />

2<br />

Universitatsklinikum SchleswigHolstein, Clinic <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy,<br />

Kiel, Germany<br />

3<br />

Instituut Verbeeten, Medical Physics, Tilburg, The Netherlands<br />

4<br />

University Wisconsin, Medical Physics, Madison, USA<br />

For several decades, the radiotherapy community has utilized<br />

reference airkerma rate (RAKR) as the only traceable quantity for<br />

brachytherapy (BT) source strength U. This quantity is used in place <strong>of</strong><br />

apparent activity, milligram radium equivalent, and other antiquated<br />

quantities. A new quantity, doserate to water at 1 cm perpendicular<br />

to the source long axis, is under consideration in the European<br />

metrology laboratories. This presentation will examine the current<br />

practice <strong>of</strong> clinical dosimetry for photonemitting BT sources using<br />

source strength calibrations based on RAKR, with community impact<br />

and quantitative comparisons <strong>of</strong> source strength calibrations based on<br />

doserate to water at 1 cm.<br />

The BT source calibration chain is complex and has evolved to include<br />

several constituents [DeWerd et al. 2004]. It is initiated by BT source<br />

manufacturers producing a new source type. The radiological<br />

properties <strong>of</strong> this source are determined by academic researcher(s)<br />

who typically characterize the dose distribution using measurements<br />

and Monte Carlo (MC) methods <strong>of</strong> radiation transport simulations. An<br />

important part <strong>of</strong> this characterization is to determine the doserate<br />

constant Λ, which is the ratio <strong>of</strong> the doserate to water at 1 cm from<br />

the source center on the transverse plane <strong>of</strong> the source to the source<br />

strength as in Λ = D(r,θ)/Kr. The source strength is to be measured at<br />

a primary standards dosimetry laboratory (PSDL) having a calibration<br />

standard for that radionuclide. PSDL measurement <strong>of</strong> the source<br />

strength permits calibration <strong>of</strong> reentrant welltype ionization<br />

chambers at secondary standards dosimetry labs (SSDLs) and for the<br />

BT source manufacturer.<br />

In BT practice within the United States, the clinical medical physicist<br />

has their reentrant welltype ionization chamber calibrated by an<br />

SSDL (Accredited Dosimetry Calibration Lab) for PSDL (National<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Standards and Technology) traceability. In Europe, SSDLs<br />

are not prevalent and physicists calibrate their own dosimetry<br />

equipment against a PSDLtraceable chamber for that particular<br />

source model. When ordering BT sources for a patient, the physicist<br />

measures the source strength for intercomparison with the source<br />

strength on the certificate provided by the manufacturer [Butler et al.<br />

2008]. The physicistmeasured source strength may then be entered<br />

into the BT treatment planning system (TPS), along with the<br />

consensus Λ value for that particular source model, for clinical dose<br />

calculations. The product <strong>of</strong> Λ and RAKR yields the doserate to water<br />

at 1 cm from the source center on the transverse plane. Additional BT<br />

dosimetry parameters are used for derivation <strong>of</strong> dose distributions<br />

following the AAPM TG43 dose calculation formalism [Rivard et al.<br />

2004]. This process is well established.<br />

The joint AAPM/GECESTRO TG138 report determined uncertainties<br />

for this dose calculation process, starting with BT source calibrations<br />

[DeWerd et al. 2011]. For lowenergy photonemitting sources such as<br />

<strong>12</strong>5 I, clinical procedures usually utilize many sources in which<br />

manufacturerprovided source strengths are determined in 7% wide<br />

groupings from a nominal value and the physicistmeasured source<br />

strengths are determined from a subset <strong>of</strong> the total batch.<br />

Consequently, the uncertainty attributed to source strengths for low<br />

energy sources is larger than that initially measured at the PSDL. For<br />

highenergy photonemitting sources such as HDR 192 Ir, clinical<br />

procedures utilize a single source in which the manufacturer and<br />

physicist calibration uncertainties are smaller than for lowenergy<br />

seeds.<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> a source strength calibration standard based on dose<br />

rate to water at 1 cm is a new concept, and aims to remove the step<br />

associated with Λ derivation so that physicists would calibrate source<br />

strength in terms <strong>of</strong> doserate to water at 1 cm instead <strong>of</strong> RAKR<br />

[Rivard et al. 2009]. Source strength calibration uncertainties<br />

associated with each step in the current (RAKR) and proposed (dose<br />

rate to water) methods are examined. While it is not apparent that<br />

the new/proposed calibration method is superior to the established<br />

method based on RAKR, an action plan and resources required to<br />

guide the BT community to the proposed new calibration standard are<br />

discussed.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

21<br />

CLINICAL RESULTS<br />

R. Pötter 1<br />

1<br />

Medical University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Vienna,<br />

Austria<br />

: Imageguided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) is<br />

increasingly implemented as new treatment option for cervix cancer<br />

applying the GYN GEC ESTRO recommendations. This approach allows<br />

for balancing target coverage/dose and dose volume constraints for<br />

OARs. With 2D conventional treatment planning (fixed point (A)<br />

prescription) only some adaptation <strong>of</strong> OAR dose points is possible.<br />

Dosimetric studies comparing 2D and 3D dose planning have provided<br />

evidence for better OAR sparing using 3D. Therefore it is expected<br />

that IGABT will result in decrease <strong>of</strong> BT related morbidity.<br />

Clinical evidence for this expectation is provided by retrospective<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> mono and multicentre experience (RetroEMBRACE) and<br />

some upcoming prospective multicentre comparative and<br />

observational studies (STIC/EMBRACE). The outcome data indicate a<br />

decrease <strong>of</strong> morbidity, however, they are not straightforward. The<br />

value <strong>of</strong> historical comparisons with 2D data is also limited due to<br />

retrospective (multicentre) data collection for morbidity assessment<br />

with even different scoring systems being applied.<br />

: There are single<br />

institution reports after IGABT on late morbidity showing rectal<br />

morbidity (mainly rectal bleeding) ranging between <strong>12</strong>42%. In a small<br />

selected patient population (Ge<strong>org</strong> 2009), endoscopic changes and<br />

clinical symptoms were observed after HDR BT in 77% (27/35) and in<br />

37% (13/35). The probability from dose effect analysis for Vienna<br />

rectoscopy score (VRS) changes ≥3 was <strong>10</strong>%/50% at 59/68 Gy (all doses<br />

in EQD2) for rectal D2ccm and <strong>10</strong>%/50% for rectal side effects G24 at<br />

65/76 Gy D2ccm. This number (selected patient group) contrasts with<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 9<br />

results from a larger patient population (Ge<strong>org</strong> 20<strong>10</strong>, 2011). Based on<br />

dose effect analysis there is <strong>10</strong>% probability for a D2ccm <strong>of</strong> 73 Gy.(G14)<br />

and 78 Gy (G24), resp. Clinical rectal side effects were actuarial <strong>12</strong>%<br />

(11/141) for any grade (8/141 for G24) for a mean rectal D2ccm <strong>of</strong> 65<br />

Gy (med foll.up 51 mths). Overall, G3/G4 actuarial rates were 4% for<br />

bladder, 2% for rectum, and 2% for sigmoid.<br />

Rectoscopic changes (VRS score ≥ 2) were reported with a 50%<br />

incidence after HDR BT for a D2ccm <strong>of</strong> 75 Gy (Koom 2007). Clinical<br />

rectal bleeding from the same authors (mean rectal D2ccm 70.4 Gy)<br />

showed actuarial 42% for any grade <strong>of</strong> rectal bleeding (RTOG/EORTC)<br />

with only 2% severe bleeding (G34) after 3D BT compared to 13%<br />

after 2D BT (Kang 20<strong>10</strong>).<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> adverse <strong>events</strong> <strong>of</strong> preop 3DLDR BT without EBRT was<br />

20 for grade <strong>12</strong> and 0 for grade 34 in 13/39 patients with a follow up<br />

<strong>of</strong> 4.4 years (HaieMeder 2009). Late overall toxicity <strong>of</strong> MRI based 3D<br />

PDR BT plus EBRT was 21/45 G<strong>12</strong>, 1/45 G3 (0 G4) with follow up <strong>of</strong> 26<br />

mths after .mean D2ccm <strong>of</strong> 61 Gy and 72 Gy for rectum and bladder,<br />

resp (Chargari 2009).<br />

Preliminary data from retroEMBRACE from 417 patients shows 96 GU,<br />

143 GI and 161 vagina late adverse <strong>events</strong> at 3 years after median<br />

D2ccm <strong>of</strong> 73 Gy for bladder and 63 Gy for rectum and sigmoid (Fokdal<br />

2011).<br />

The first<br />

prospective multicenter study was performed in France (STIC) as non<br />

randomised trial comparing 2D vs. 3D PDR BT (mainly CT based). The<br />

cumulative actuarial incidence <strong>of</strong> overall G3G4 morbidity at 2 years<br />

(GI, GU, Gyn) was 2.6% vs. 22.7% in the 3D vs. 2D arm in 117 vs. 118<br />

patients (p=0.002) with definitive treatment (EBRT+IGABT) delivering<br />

mean 73 Gy EQD2 to the HR CTV (3D arm) and mean D2ccm <strong>of</strong> 68 Gy to<br />

rectum and 64 Gy to bladder (CharraBrunaud 20<strong>12</strong>).<br />

EMBRACE, a prospective multicentre observational study, investigates<br />

MRI based IGABT. The mean follow up <strong>of</strong> 1 year in overall 600 patients<br />

accrued by 3/20<strong>12</strong> does not allow any valid estimates <strong>of</strong> late toxicity.<br />

: IGABT for definitive treatment in locally advanced<br />

cervical cancer as practiced in single and multicentre settings results<br />

in low rates <strong>of</strong> grade 3 and 4 and moderate rates <strong>of</strong> G1 and G2 toxicity<br />

after limited follow up. There is some (limited) evidence that these<br />

rates seem to be lower than after traditional 2D BT confirming the<br />

dosimetric evidence. More mature data from prospective clinical trials<br />

is needed to support these first observations.<br />

22<br />

DVH PARAMETER ANALYSIS<br />

K. Tanderup 1<br />

1 Aarhus University Hospital, Medical Physics, Aarhus C, Denmark<br />

With the advent <strong>of</strong> image guided adaptive brachytherapy (BT), it has<br />

become possible to define a common language to communicate<br />

information in a valid, reliable and reproducible way about dose and<br />

volumes, and thus to facilitate a better understanding dose volume<br />

relations and dose volume effects. In 2006 GEC ESTRO<br />

recommendations for reporting and recording <strong>of</strong> dose parameters<br />

were published for BT in cervical cancer (Pötter et al 2006). A new<br />

ICRU report is currently in progress on “Dose and volume reporting in<br />

brachytherapy in cervical cancer”, and the presentation will outline<br />

the recommendations with regard to DVH parameter reporting.<br />

Due to the rapid dose fall<strong>of</strong>f near the BT sources there is a large dose<br />

inhomogeneity in OARs. The <strong>org</strong>an walls adjacent to the applicator<br />

(sources), like the anterior rectal and sigmoid (bowel) walls, inferior<br />

and mid–posterior bladder wall, or the vaginal wall adjacent to the<br />

cervix and vaginal applicator, are irradiated with doses <strong>of</strong> 50%<strong>10</strong>0+%<br />

<strong>of</strong> prescribed BT dose in a typical scenario for definitive cervix cancer<br />

radiotherapy. On the contrary, the more distant <strong>org</strong>an, like the<br />

posterior rectosigmoid (bowel) walls, the superior–anterior bladder<br />

wall, or the inferior vagina, are irradiated by BT with much lower<br />

doses (


S<strong>10</strong> <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

<br />

OC24<br />

TENYEAR OUTCOMES FOR PATIENTS WITH GLEASON 8<strong>10</strong> TREATED<br />

WITH HIGH DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY BOOST<br />

A. Martinez 1 , C. Shah 2 , N. Mohammed 2 , J. Demanes 3 , R. Martinez<br />

Monge 4 , H. Ye 2 , R. Galalae 5<br />

1<br />

Michigan Healthcare Pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, Radiation Oncology, Farmington<br />

Hills, USA<br />

2<br />

Beaumont Health System, Radiation Oncology, Royal Oak, USA<br />

4<br />

Universidad de Navarra, Radiation Oncology, Pamplona, Spain<br />

5<br />

Kiel University, Radiation Oncology, Kiel, Germany<br />

: To report long term multiinstitutional outcomes<br />

for Gleason 8–<strong>10</strong> prostate cancer patients treated with external beam<br />

radiotherapy (EBRT) and high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost.<br />

Between 1987 and 2002, 483 patients with<br />

Gleason 8<strong>10</strong> disease were treated for localized prostate cancer at<br />

William Beaumont Hospital (WBH), the California Endocurietherapy<br />

Center (CET), Kiel University, and the Universidad de Navarra on four<br />

prospective HDR boost trials. Conformal EBRT was delivered to the<br />

pelvis (dose range 36 Gy–50.4 Gy) along with HDR boost for a<br />

combined biologic equivalent dose (BED) <strong>of</strong> 215–366 Gy (α/β=1.2).<br />

Conformal intensity modulated HDRBT was planned and treatment<br />

was delivered using online transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images at<br />

WBH. At CET, Kiel University, and Navarra University, HDRBT<br />

treatment planning was CT based. Biochemical control (BC) was<br />

defined according to the Phoenix criteria (freedom from PSA rise <strong>of</strong><br />

2ng/ml above nadir).<br />

: Mean patient age was 68.4 years with mean initial PSA (iPSA)<br />

<strong>of</strong> 18.8 ng/ml. Mean followup was 6.1 years. <strong>10</strong>year outcomes were:<br />

biochemical control (BC) 53.5%, distant metastases (DM) 22.1%,<br />

clinical failure (CF) 25.6%, cause specific survival (CSS) 82.6% and<br />

overall survival (OS) 62.7%. Hormones were given in 69.9% <strong>of</strong> patients<br />

but did not significantly improve BC, DM, CSS, or OS. <strong>10</strong>year<br />

outcomes stratified by iPSA (40 ng/ml) were improved for all<br />

outcomes with lower iPSA including BC (57.4% v. <strong>10</strong>.3%, p


S<strong>12</strong> <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

204 patients were identified as having a high risk anatomic prostate<br />

gland (50cc, or history <strong>of</strong> prior TURP). 46 patients were<br />

identified as having ultrasound prostate volume <strong>of</strong> ≤20 cc at the time<br />

<strong>of</strong> the implant (median, 17.8cc, range 6.7cc20cc; lower quartile,<br />

6.7cc15.5cc). <strong>12</strong>1 patients were identified as having ultrasound<br />

prostate volume <strong>of</strong> ≥50 cc at the time <strong>of</strong> the implant (median, 61cc,<br />

range 50cc116cc; upper quartile 74cc116cc). 37 patients were<br />

identified as having a history <strong>of</strong> a prior TURP. In the standard risk<br />

group there were 443 patients, the median ultrasound prostate<br />

volume was 32.8cc (range, 20.249.8).<br />

Neoadjuvant hormone therapy was not routinely recommended unless<br />

the initial ultrasound prostate volume suggested significant pubic arch<br />

interference or the patient's Gleason score and or prostate specific<br />

antigen placed the patient in either intermediate or high risk<br />

categories. Patients received HDR brachytherapy as a boost either<br />

before or after 4500 cGy <strong>of</strong> external beam radiotherapy (3D conformal<br />

until 2006 and IMRT thereafter). Boost brachytherapy doses ranged<br />

from 1600 1900 cGy, given in 23 fractions, with the most common<br />

fractionation schedule being 950 cGy in two daily fractions given on<br />

the same day as the implant with a minimum 6 hours interval between<br />

fractions.<br />

: The dosimetric findings are as follows:<br />

Patient<br />

Group<br />

D90 V<strong>10</strong>0 V150 D5 rectum D5 urethra<br />

50cc Median<strong>10</strong>6.2% 95.1% 18.2% 55.4% <strong>10</strong>9.7%<br />

N=<strong>12</strong>1 Range 95117% 9099% 3.335% 3771% <strong>10</strong>3<strong>12</strong>1%<br />

TURP Median <strong>10</strong>7.8% 94.7% 19.3% 54.2% <strong>10</strong>7.8%<br />

N=37 Range <strong>10</strong>2.5117% 87.9<strong>10</strong>0% 5.332% 3474% <strong>10</strong>1<strong>12</strong>1%<br />

Standard Median <strong>10</strong>7.5% 95.5% 18% 51% 1<strong>10</strong>%<br />

N=443 Range 94117% 83<strong>10</strong>0% 336.5% 2473% 97<strong>12</strong>2%<br />

*High risk groups in bold<br />

With a median <strong>of</strong> 5.1 years, there have been nine grade II urethral<br />

strictures (CTCAE v.3) for the entire cohort. Four <strong>of</strong> these occurred in<br />

the anatomic high risk group and five occurred in the standard risk<br />

group. There was one grade II incontinence in the high risk group and<br />

one grade I incontinence in the standard risk group. There was only<br />

one grade II or higher toxicities found in the high risk group as well as<br />

only a single grade II gastrointestinal toxicity in the standard group.<br />

: In our experience, cases traditional deemed as<br />

unsuitable for prostate brachytherapy (50cc, prior TURP) are<br />

well managed with HDR brachytherapy with the expectation <strong>of</strong><br />

excellent dosimetric coverage acceptable long term toxicities.<br />

OC29<br />

SALVAGE HDR BRACHYTHERAPY FOR RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER<br />

AFTER PRIOR DEFINITIVE RADIOTHERAPY: FIVE YEAR OUTCOMES<br />

C.P. Chen 1 , V. Weinberg 2 , K. Shinohara 3 , M. Nash 1 , A. Gottschalk 1 , M.<br />

Roach III 1 , I. Hsu 1<br />

1<br />

UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, San<br />

Francisco, USA<br />

2<br />

Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Biostatistics Core,<br />

Biostatistics, San Francisco, USA<br />

3<br />

University <strong>of</strong> California San Francisco, Urology, San Francisco, USA<br />

: Evaluate the efficacy and toxicity <strong>of</strong> salvage high<br />

dose rate brachytherapy (HDRB) for locally recurrent prostate cancer<br />

after definitive radiotherapy (RT).<br />

: From November 1998 to June 2009, we<br />

retrospectively analyzed 52 consecutively accrued patients undergoing<br />

salvage HDRB for locally recurrent prostate cancer after prior<br />

definitive RT. After pathologic confirmation <strong>of</strong> locally recurrent<br />

disease, all patients received 36 Gy in 6 fractions. Twentyfour<br />

patients received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy prior to salvage<br />

whereas no patients received adjuvant hormonal therapy.<br />

Determination <strong>of</strong> biochemical failure (bF) after salvage HDRB was<br />

based on the Phoenix definition. The 5 year probability estimates <strong>of</strong><br />

overall survival (OS) and bF were calculated using KaplanMeier<br />

method. Univariate analyses were performed using the log rank test<br />

for categorical variables and Cox’s proportional hazards model for<br />

continuous variables to identify predictors <strong>of</strong> bF. Based on the<br />

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 4),<br />

acute (less than 3 months postsalvage) and late (more than 3 months)<br />

genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were<br />

documented.<br />

: Median followup after salvage HDRB was 59.6 months<br />

(range, 5.9 – 154.7 months). The 5year KaplanMeier estimate <strong>of</strong> OS<br />

was 92% (95% confidence interval (CI) 8097%) without median survival<br />

yet reached. Fiveyear biochemical control after salvage was 51% (95%<br />

CI 3466%). Median PSA nadir postsalvage was 0.1 (range 0 – 7.2) for<br />

all patients. However, patients who were bNED had median PSA nadir<br />

<strong>of</strong> 0.025 (range 0 – 0.6) whereas those who recurred after salvage had<br />

a median nadir (PSA) <strong>of</strong> 0.49 (range 0 – 7.2). On univariate analysis,<br />

disease free interval after initial definitive radiotherapy (p=0.07),<br />

interval from 1 st recurrence to salvage HDRB (p=0.09), and preHDRB<br />

PSA (p=0.07) were <strong>of</strong> borderline significance in predicting bF after<br />

salvage HDRB.<br />

Fortysix patients are alive (27 NED) and 6 patients have died (2 NED).<br />

Overall, after salvage HDRB, 22 patients developed disease<br />

recurrence with 16 having biochemical failure without pathologic or<br />

radiographic confirmation <strong>of</strong> recurrence, 3 with pathologic local<br />

recurrence, 2 with regional recurrence, and one with distant<br />

metastasis.<br />

Overall there were no Grade 4 or 5 toxicities and very few Grade 3<br />

acute or late symptoms. Acute and late grade 3 GU toxicities were<br />

observed in only 2% and 2%, respectively. There was minimal GI<br />

toxicity with no Grade 2 or higher acute <strong>events</strong> and only 4% grade 2<br />

late <strong>events</strong>.<br />

: We present the largest series <strong>of</strong> patients treated with<br />

salvage HDR brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after<br />

prior definitive RT. Prostate HDR brachytherapy is an effective<br />

salvage modality with few toxicities. We provide potential predictors<br />

<strong>of</strong> biochemical control for prostate salvage HDR brachytherapy.<br />

<br />

<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 13<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

OC30<br />

RESULTS OF I<strong>12</strong>5 STRANDS + EBRT +ADT IN LOCALIZED PROSTATE<br />

CANCER COMPARED TO KATTAN (2002) NOMOGRAM PREDICTIONS<br />

J. Zimmermann 1 , P. Zimmermann 2 , C. Moustakis 3<br />

1<br />

Praxiszentrum Alstertal, and Interdisziplinäres Prostatazentrum<br />

Kath. Marienkrankenhaus, Hamburg, Germany<br />

2<br />

Praxiszentrum Alstertal, Hamburg, Germany<br />

3<br />

Institut für Medizinische Physik, Klinik für Strahlentherapie,<br />

Münster, Germany<br />

: To evaluate the 5year biochemical progression<br />

free survival after prostate brachytherapy with I<strong>12</strong>5 strands +EBRT+<br />

ADT and compare the results to pretherapeutic prediction tools.<br />

Furtheron evaluation <strong>of</strong> TURP and clinical proctitis after treatment.<br />

: Between 01/2004 and <strong>12</strong>/2007, n=604<br />

consecutive patients with localized prostate carcinoma (N0M0) were<br />

treated in curative intention with iodine <strong>12</strong>5 strands (145 Gy<br />

Mono/<strong>10</strong>8 Gy with EBRT). N=71 patients had EBRT 45 Gy, n=153 ADT.<br />

Intraop preplanning in 2004 and 2005, intraop online planning in 2006<br />

and 2007. N=7 were lost to follow up, n=597 evaluable. N=313 had low<br />

risk (LR), n=204 intermediate risk (IR) and n=80 high risk (HR) disease<br />

according to the d´Amico classification. Mean follow up was 60,01<br />

months (392). The endpoint was freedom from biochemical<br />

progression (FFBP) according to the Phoenix criteria. The analysis<br />

evaluates this endpoint for risk grouping, initial PSA level, Gleason<br />

score, age, prior TURP, mean seed activity, additional ADT and more.<br />

Furtheron we looked at side effects (TURP, proctitis). The results are<br />

compared to the patient related averaged 5yearpredictions from the<br />

Kattan/MSKCC nomogram (2002) in order a. to compare the results to<br />

internationally established outcome predictions for RPX, EBRT and<br />

Brachy +EBRT (BE), b. to normalize the subgroup results and c.<br />

therefore to identify potential good or weak spots for quality<br />

assurance.<br />

: Overall FFBP was 93.3%. FFBP was 96.49% in LR group<br />

(Kattan: RPE 90%/EBRT88%/BE 89%), 90,2% in IR (Kattan: RPE<br />

75%/EBRT 77%/BE 80%) and 88,88 % in HR group (Kattan: RPE<br />

62%/EBRT 56 %/BE 81%). PSA < <strong>10</strong> ng/ml showed a FFBP <strong>of</strong> 94.35%,<br />

PSA <strong>10</strong> 20 ng/ml <strong>of</strong> 95,24 (!) %. FFBP in Gleason =8 87.5%. After TURP for<br />

LR patients, FFBP was 86.7% (Kattan: RPE 90%/EBRT 90%/BE 89%) ,<br />

after TURP for IR patients 88.89 % (Kattan: RPE 77%/EBRT 79%/BE<br />

84%) and after TURP for HR patients 75% (Kattan: RPE 62%/EBRT<br />

56%/BE 83%) . FFBP in patients < 65 years was 93.79%, 6574 years<br />

92.33% and in patients > 75 years 97.06 %. Patients without ADT had<br />

FFBP <strong>of</strong> 94.37% (Kattan: RPE 84%/EBRT82%/BE 86%), patients with ADT<br />

90.2% (Kattan: RPE 75%/EBRT74%/BE 80%).<br />

Activity per seed 0.7 mCi <strong>of</strong> 95.24%.<br />

After brachytherapy alone, TURP rate was 3,9%, rate <strong>of</strong> proctitis<br />

I/II/III was 2.1%. After brachytherapy and EBRT, TURP rate was 6.5%<br />

and proctitis I/II/III rate 8.7 %.<br />

:<br />

1. FFBP in all risk groups after a mean follow up <strong>of</strong> 60 months is<br />

excellent and compared to the patient related predictions from 2002<br />

Kattan/MSKCC nomograms signifantly better than predictions for RPX<br />

and EBRT as well as for Brachy+EBRT.<br />

2. It is possible to normalize the patients outcome in subgroups with<br />

the individual progression risks, which is especially interesting for<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> subgroups with special aspects or individual risks.<br />

3. Thus, comparing results with the subgroup related averaged<br />

nomogram predictions might be a promising tool for intra/and<br />

interinstitutional quality assurance or clinical trials.<br />

OC31<br />

COMPARISON OF DISTANT METASTASES FOR PROSTATE CANCER<br />

PATIENTS TREATED WITH PROSTATECTOMY, BRACHYTHERAPY OR IMRT<br />

M. Zelefsky 1 , J. Eastham 2 , P. Scardino 2 , X. Pei 1 , M. Kollmeier 1 , B.<br />

Cox 1 , Y. Yamada 1<br />

1<br />

Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, New<br />

York, USA<br />

2<br />

Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Urology, New York, USA<br />

: To compare the longterm distant metastases<br />

free survival outcomes (DMFS) for patients with clinically localized<br />

prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy (RP),<br />

brachytherapy (BRT) or intensity modulated external beam<br />

radiotherapy (IMRT).<br />

: Between 1993 and 2009, 5316 patients with<br />

clinical stages T1cT2c were treated with RP (n=2870), BRT (n=1344)<br />

or IMRT (n=1<strong>10</strong>2). In the BRT cohort, 9<strong>10</strong> patients were treated with<br />

monotherapy, and 434 patients with higherrisk disease were treated<br />

with a combined modality approach which utilized supplemental IMRT<br />

to a dose <strong>of</strong> 4550.4 Gy. Patients treated with IMRT alone were<br />

treated to > 81 Gy. Patients were classified according to the NCCN<br />

risk group classification. The median follow up was 4.8 years (range:<br />

217 years).<br />

: The 7year DMFS for the RP, BRT and IMRT groups were 1.5%,<br />

0.8% and 3.6 % (p< 0.001). In the low risk group no significant<br />

differences were observed between the treatment cohorts ; the 7<br />

year DMFS rates were 0.7%, 0% and 1.2% for RP, BRT and IMRT groups<br />

(overall p value=1.0). For the intermediate risk cohort, IMRT patients<br />

experienced a higher incidence <strong>of</strong> distant metastases compared to the<br />

other cohorts; the 7year DMFS rates were 2.5%, 2.5% and 4.9% for RP,<br />

BRT and IMRT groups (p= 0.02). Cox regression analysis revealed the<br />

following variables to be associated with an inferior DMFS: higher<br />

clinical stage (p=0.004), biopsy Gleason score 7 vs 6 (p


S14 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

(p=0.08). The bladder maximum dose and D2 cc were not significantly<br />

different between arms.<br />

: HDR achieves significantly higher intraprostatic doses to<br />

the prostate while significantly decreasing the maximum rectal dose<br />

with our best achievable SBRT treatment planning. This was shown<br />

with patients treated with HDR monotherapy and using the plans and<br />

dosimetry to create a best achievable SBRT plan. This should be the<br />

standard to compare these modalities rather than the reverse, and is<br />

a strength to our study. Whether SBRT will provide benefit over<br />

brachytherapy clinically has yet to be demonstrated, and future<br />

studies comparing the two modalities will help gain insight into the<br />

role <strong>of</strong> each treatment.<br />

OC33<br />

COMPARATIVE COSTEFFECTIVENESS OF SALVAGE BRACHYTHERAPY VS.<br />

HORMONAL TREATMENT OF RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER<br />

L. Steuten 1 , M. Piena 1 , M. Peters 2 , M. van Vulpen 2<br />

1<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Twente, Health Technology and Services Research,<br />

Enschede, The Netherlands<br />

2<br />

University Medical Centre Utrecht, Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The<br />

Netherlands<br />

: To estimate the incremental cost per Quality<br />

Adjusted Life Year (QALY) <strong>of</strong> focal and total salvage using<br />

brachytherapy compared to each other and to hormonal treatment in<br />

patient with recurrent prostate cancer.<br />

: A decision analytic model comparing costs<br />

and QALYs associated with focal salvage, total salvage and hormonal<br />

therapy was developed. The analysis considered a 1 year time horizon<br />

and adopted a hospital perspective on costs. Probabilities for severe<br />

urogenital, severe gastrointestinal, nonsevere toxicity and their<br />

impact on healthrelated quality <strong>of</strong> life (SF36) were derived from a<br />

clinical study <strong>of</strong> the University Medical Centre Utrecht (UMCU) and<br />

complemented with literature data where required. Cost data were<br />

gathered from the UMCU and complemented with available national<br />

cost data. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis, using <strong>10</strong>000 Monte Carlo<br />

simulations, was performed to quantify the joint decision uncertainty<br />

at the recommended willingness to pay threshold <strong>of</strong> €80k / QALY.<br />

: Focal and total salvage with brachytherapy both have higher<br />

expected effectiveness than hormonal treatment but also higher costs<br />

(see table). Generating one additional QALY with focal salvage<br />

brachytherapy costs €93299 compared to hormonal therapy. However,<br />

the model indicates large decision uncertainty between these two<br />

treatments with circa 40% probability for focal salvage brachytherapy<br />

to be costeffective. Focal salvage dominates total salvage as it has<br />

higher expected effectiveness and lower expected costs. Decision<br />

uncertainty between these two alternatives is small, with circa 80%<br />

probability for focal salvage to be costeffective compared to total<br />

salvage. In both comparisons, the main drivers <strong>of</strong> decision uncertainty<br />

are the probabilities for severe toxicity and impact on healthrelated<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> life.<br />

Therapy Cost Incremental<br />

cost<br />

QALYs Incremental<br />

QALYs<br />

Hormonal €1840 0.83 <br />

Focal<br />

salvage<br />

brachyth.<br />

Total<br />

salvage<br />

brachyth.<br />

€6683 + € 4843 (vs.<br />

hormonal)<br />

€<strong>10</strong>945 + € 4263 (vs.<br />

focal)<br />

Incremental<br />

cost / QALY<br />

0.88 +0.05 (vs. €93299<br />

hormonal)<br />

0.87 0.01 (vs.<br />

focal)<br />

Dominated by<br />

focal salvage<br />

: Focal salvage using brachytherapy is likely to dominate<br />

total salvage as it is both more effective and less costly. Based on<br />

current data, hormonal treatment <strong>of</strong> recurrent prostate cancer seems<br />

more costeffective than focal salvage with brachytherapy.<br />

Substantial decision uncertainty exists between focal salvage and<br />

hormonal treatment, driven by uncertain probabilities for urogenital<br />

and gastrointestinal toxicity and impact on healthrelated quality <strong>of</strong><br />

life. Therefore, further clinical trials comparing toxicity patterns and<br />

healthrelated quality <strong>of</strong> life following focal salvage brachytherapy or<br />

hormonal treatment among patients with recurrent prostate cancer<br />

are recommended as most valuable to inform future decisionmaking.<br />

OC34<br />

A NOVEL METHOD TO QUANTIFY PROSTATE SEED IMPLANT PLAN<br />

QUALITY BY PERFORMING INDIVIDUAL SEED DISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS<br />

Y. Le 1 , R. Alexander 2 , E. Armour 1 , D. Song 1<br />

1<br />

Johns Hopkins University, Radiation Oncology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />

2<br />

Southern University, Physics, Baton Rouge LA, USA<br />

: We report on a novel method to quantify the<br />

treatment plan quality for prostate seed implant by performing<br />

Individual Seed Displacement Analysis (ISDA). The clinical relevance <strong>of</strong><br />

this method was also investigated.<br />

: A s<strong>of</strong>tware tool was developed to calculate<br />

dose parameters using seed locations and <strong>org</strong>an contours exported<br />

from a brachytherapy treatment planning system. ISDA analysis is<br />

defined as the following: for a plan with N seeds used, N additional<br />

plans are automatically generated by removing one individual seed at<br />

a time to simulate the impact <strong>of</strong> a seed being displaced far enough to<br />

have minimum effect on local dose. The dosimetric impact <strong>of</strong><br />

removing each seed is quantified by the reduction <strong>of</strong> V<strong>10</strong>0 in each<br />

new plan. Although this approach assumes the extreme case in which<br />

a seed is completely missing, the result reflects the dosimetric<br />

sensitivity <strong>of</strong> positioning error for each individual seed. 'Critical<br />

seeds', defined as those whose displacement resulted in greater than<br />

0.5% V<strong>10</strong>0 reduction, are identified. The number <strong>of</strong> 'critical seed' per<br />

plan can be used to quantify robustness <strong>of</strong> treatment plans. To<br />

demonstrate this tool, a planning study and a retrospective case study<br />

were conducted. For planning study, 48 treatment plans were created<br />

independently by 3 experienced planners using ultrasound images<br />

from 8 patients (volumes 28 to 53cc; mean 39cc) and same dosimetric<br />

requirements. Each planner created one I<strong>12</strong>5 plan (145Gy,<br />

0.5U/seed) and one Pd<strong>10</strong>3 plan (<strong>12</strong>5Gy, 2.5U/seed) for each patient.<br />

ISDA analysis was performed for all plans. For retrospective patient<br />

case study, 73 patients' OR preplans were analyzed and number <strong>of</strong><br />

'critical seed' for each plan obtained. The postimplant CT dosimetry<br />

results were used to test the correlation between number <strong>of</strong> 'critical<br />

seed' and actual dosimetry outcome.<br />

: The results <strong>of</strong> the planning study are shown in the table 1a.<br />

The dose perturbation caused by displacing 'critical seed' is more<br />

significant than average seed, indicating the plans with more 'critical<br />

seeds' are more susceptible to seed displacement error during the<br />

seed implantation. Among 73 patients analyzed using ISDA, 52<br />

patients' plans had less than 5 'critical seeds' and 21 patients' plan had<br />

5 or more 'critical seeds'. The average postimplant CT V<strong>10</strong>0 and D90<br />

from both patient groups are shown in the table 1b. Plans with more<br />

'critical seeds' showed statistically significant correlation with inferior<br />

dosimetric results.<br />

: A method and s<strong>of</strong>tware tool to perform ISDA was<br />

developed and demonstrated on prostate seed implant cases. 'Critical<br />

seeds' could exist in both I<strong>12</strong>5 or Pd<strong>10</strong>3 based plans and number <strong>of</strong><br />

'critical seed' in clinical plans shows direct correlation to the<br />

dosimetric outcome. This tool can be utilized to guide the treatment<br />

planning process to develop more robust plans and therefore to<br />

minimize the potential effect <strong>of</strong> seed displacement errors.<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 15<br />

OC35<br />

CBCT GUIDED INTRAOPERATIVE DYNAMIC DOSIMETRY SIGNIFICANTLY<br />

IMPROVES DOSIMETRY FOR I<strong>12</strong>5 PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

R. Westendorp 1 , J. Immerzeel 2 , R. Kattevilder 2 , C. Hoekstra 2 , S. van<br />

de Pol 2 , T. Nuver 1 , A. Minken 1<br />

1<br />

RISO, Physics, Deventer, The Netherlands<br />

2<br />

RISO, Radiotherapy, Deventer, The Netherlands<br />

: To report the dosimetry results and the clinical<br />

experience obtained with routine Cone Beam CT (CBCT) guided intra<br />

operative dynamic dosimetry for 900 prostate patients.<br />

: 900 Patients received transperineal <strong>12</strong>5 I<br />

brachytherapy for prostate cancer over a period <strong>of</strong> 5 years. Treatment<br />

was performed as 145 Gy monotherapy (82%) or as a boost (1<strong>10</strong> Gy)<br />

with external beam radiotherapy. Several weeks prior to the<br />

implantation procedure a volume study was performed to assess the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> seeds needed. At the same time four fiducial markers were<br />

implanted.<br />

The implantation procedure took place in the operating theater, seeds<br />

were placed under TransRectal UltraSound (TRUS) guidance with<br />

interactive planning. After implantation <strong>of</strong> the seeds, a TRUSscan was<br />

obtained to contour the prostate and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk. The positions <strong>of</strong><br />

the implanted seeds were determined using a CBCTscan that was<br />

merged with the TRUS images using the fiducial markers as landmarks.<br />

Dose calculation was performed on this combined imageset. If<br />

dosimetry was deemed inadequate due to underdosage in critical<br />

areas a correction plan was made and remedial seeds were implanted.<br />

Final dosimetry was performed on new TRUS and CBCT images. The<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> this procedure was assessed on Day 0 and Day 30 by<br />

analyzing D90 and V<strong>10</strong>0 for the prostate and the dose to the <strong>org</strong>ans at<br />

risk.<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> the remedial seeds was quantified by excluding their<br />

dosecontribution at the postimplant plans and compare the resulting<br />

dosimetry with the real postimplant dosimetry.<br />

: Immediately after implantation for 181 (20%) <strong>of</strong> the patients<br />

a critical underdosage was observed and remedial seeds were placed.<br />

In 2007 in 25% <strong>of</strong> the cases remedial seeds were placed, that reduced<br />

to 11% in 2011. On average 3.9 (st dev 1.6) seeds were added.<br />

Directly after correction, the mean D90 increased from 96% to <strong>10</strong>8%,<br />

V<strong>10</strong>0 increased from 85% to 95%.On Day 30 the dosimetry was adequate<br />

for all patients, indicating effective adaptation <strong>of</strong> initially underdosed<br />

areas in the prostate. With remedial seeds excluded in the corrected<br />

cases on Day 30, the simulated mean D90 and V<strong>10</strong>0 decreased with <strong>12</strong>%<br />

and 4% respectively. Without the reimplantation procedure on Day 30<br />

11% <strong>of</strong> all patients would have had a lower V<strong>10</strong>0 or D90 than we<br />

intended.<br />

The reimplantation procedure took on average <strong>10</strong> minutes <strong>of</strong> extra<br />

time.<br />

<br />

: Intraoperative dynamic dosimetry with CBCT allows<br />

improvement <strong>of</strong> dosimetry for a considerable group <strong>of</strong> patients at Day<br />

0 and Day 30. This reduces the need to correct the implants after<br />

finishing the operating theater procedure. The presented procedure is<br />

used routinely and takes about <strong>10</strong> minutes <strong>of</strong> additional time.<br />

OC36<br />

VALIDATION STUDY OF USBASED HDR PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

PLANNING COMPARED TO CT GOLD STANDARD<br />

M. Gaztanaga 1 , J. Crook 1 , C. Araujo 2 , M. Schmidt 2 , F. Bachand 1 , D.<br />

Batchelar 2<br />

1<br />

British Columbia Cancer Agency, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Kelowna, Canada<br />

2<br />

British Columbia Cancer Agency, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Physics,<br />

Kelowna, Canada<br />

: The use <strong>of</strong> US in a onestep procedure to both<br />

guide and plan HDRBT for prostate is growing. Phantom studies have<br />

favourably compared the accuracy <strong>of</strong> US needle tip reconstruction to<br />

the gold standard <strong>of</strong> CT. We seek to determine the accuracy <strong>of</strong> US<br />

needle tip reconstruction in vivo using conebeam CT (CBCT) as our<br />

reference standard<br />

: Treatment comprised 46 Gy/23 fractions <strong>of</strong><br />

EBRT plus 20Gy/2 HDRBT fractions, replacing the EBRT on days 5 and<br />

15. Each BT fraction was performed under general anesthetic with<br />

paralysis. A median <strong>of</strong> 16 needles (range 1618) were placed and their<br />

tips identified using live TRUS images and Varian's Vitesse s<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />

Needle protrusion length from the template was recorded as each tip<br />

was located. This allowed for reverification prior to capturing images<br />

for planning. The needles remained locked in the template which<br />

remained fixed to the stepper while a set <strong>of</strong> 3D TRUS images was<br />

acquired to reconstruct the needle paths and plan the HDRBT<br />

treatment. Following treatment, the legs were lowered from 90° to<br />

40° to acquire a set <strong>of</strong> CBCT images. Needles were continuously<br />

monitored on live US to rule out any SUPINF needle displacement<br />

while repositioning legs.<br />

Needles were reconstructed postoperatively in the CBCT images using<br />

Varian's BrachyVision TPS. CTidentified needles were also adjusted<br />

for protrusion length if ≥2mm displacement was observed. The<br />

coordinates <strong>of</strong> each needle tip in either CT or US were recorded from<br />

the TPS. As the origin <strong>of</strong> the coordinate system was unique to each<br />

individual image set, the tip <strong>of</strong> a needle positioned directly above the


S16 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

US probe was chosen as a reference point for each pair <strong>of</strong> USCBCT<br />

images. The cranialcaudal position <strong>of</strong> each needle tip was then<br />

determined relative to this point in each image set. Finally, the US<br />

based needle tip position was compared to the CTbased position. 21<br />

sets <strong>of</strong> needles from <strong>12</strong> consecutive patients have been analyzed. The<br />

data from the reference needles was excluded.<br />

: 318 needle tip positions have been compared between TRUS<br />

and CBCT. Of these 205 (64.5%) agreed within 1mm, 84 (26.4%) agreed<br />

within <strong>12</strong>mm, and 21 (6.6%) agreed within 23mm. For 8 needles the<br />

discrepancy between tip positions in the 2 modalities was more than<br />

3mm (2.6%).<br />

: US needle tip identification in vivo is at least as<br />

accurate as CT identification, while providing all the advantages <strong>of</strong> a<br />

onestep procedure.<br />

OC37<br />

THE PROSTATE TUMORLET PROJECT. CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF D90:<br />

TILTING AT WINDMILLS?<br />

D. Todor 1 , P.S. Lin 1 , I. Barani 2 , M. Axente 1 , M.P. Hagan 1 , M. Anscher 1<br />

1<br />

Virginia Commonwealth University, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />

Oncology, Richmond VA, USA<br />

2<br />

University <strong>of</strong> California, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, San<br />

Francisco CA, USA<br />

: In the PSA era, the small volume <strong>of</strong> disease and<br />

relatively small number <strong>of</strong> tumor foci (mean 2.5) prompted the idea<br />

<strong>of</strong> focal therapy. This work is a focibased analysis <strong>of</strong> LDR<br />

brachytherapy treatments designed for the whole prostate. We aim to<br />

identify the relationship between prostate D90 parameter and<br />

tumorlets' dose, and to describe the dose received by tumorlets in<br />

traditional whole prostate cancer treatments.This information will be<br />

used to create prescription guidelines for focal therapy.<br />

: A s<strong>of</strong>tware platform was built to create in<br />

silico prostate tumorlets, <strong>of</strong> specified morphology, volume and<br />

location. Actual knowledge <strong>of</strong> tumorlet location was replaced with<br />

statistical inference. Pre and postimplant plans for 14 patients,<br />

using Pd<strong>10</strong>3 and I<strong>12</strong>5, with prostate sizes from 2361 cm 3 were used.<br />

Tumorlets were grown in 9 volume categories from 0.1 to <strong>10</strong>cm 3 with<br />

<strong>10</strong>00 random tumorlets per category. Each tumorlet was superimposed<br />

over the 3D dose distribution and positional, morphological,<br />

dosimetric and radiobiological quantities were computed. The<br />

sensitivity <strong>of</strong> results to radiobiological parameters was assessed using<br />

two sets <strong>of</strong> parameters. A treatment reference was established using<br />

the BED EBRT equivalent <strong>of</strong> a 78Gy regimen (2Gy/fx).<br />

: The preplans were consistent, despite variations in prostate<br />

size, seeds number and planner. With D90=118.9 ±2.4%, the whole<br />

prostate EUBED was on average 135.8Gy3. By comparison, BEDo for the<br />

EBRT regimen was ~130Gy3. In all preplan scenarios, tumorlet<br />

parameters were virtually immune to volume, location or morphology<br />

variations. EUBED and gBEUD told very similar stories, with 98<strong>10</strong>0% <strong>of</strong><br />

all tumorlet volumes receiving a gBEUD and EUBED > BEDo. When<br />

separated in 'small' (0.11cc) and 'large' (2<strong>10</strong>cc) volumes, the small<br />

tumorlets were a bit more likely to get an EUBED > BEDo than large<br />

tumorlets (by ~6%). Unlike preplans, the CT based postimplant<br />

evaluations told a dramatically different story (see example in Fig 1).<br />

Uncorrelated with their high D90 (range 91.7<strong>12</strong>5.5%), the probability<br />

<strong>of</strong> any tumorlet to have EUBED > BEDo was on average only 60% with<br />

the 'small' tumorlets having a significant advantage, 79% vs. 46%, over<br />

'large' ones. While trends were similar, EUBED and gBEUD were<br />

significantly different, with an average probability <strong>of</strong> values greater<br />

then BEDo <strong>of</strong> 60% according to EUBED and 83% based on gBEUD.<br />

: Biological dose received by tumorlets in prostate shows<br />

that the D90 parameter is more meaningful for a highly <strong>org</strong>anized<br />

seed implant (true for preplans and maybe stranded seeds). For<br />

poorly structured or dis<strong>org</strong>anized implants, even a D90 > <strong>12</strong>5% can<br />

produce suboptimal results at the level <strong>of</strong> foci <strong>of</strong> disease. A smaller<br />

α/β will further amplify this effect. Also, I<strong>12</strong>5 implants seems more<br />

impacted than Pd<strong>10</strong>3.These results indicate that the architecture <strong>of</strong><br />

the implant likely plays an important role and D90 alone is limited in<br />

meaning. Smaller than prostate subvolumes are likely to be the true<br />

target explaining the positive clinical outcome in these cases.<br />

OC38<br />

BIOCHEMICAL DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL OF 3D IMAGE GUIDED<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY BOOST WITHIN A PERMANENT SEED IMPLANT.<br />

A.G. Martin 1 , S. Aubin 1 , N. Varfalvy 1 , E. Vigneault 1 , E. Vigneault 1 , L.<br />

Beaulieu 1 , P. Després 1<br />

1<br />

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec L'HôtelDieu de Québec,<br />

Radio Oncologie, Quebec, Canada<br />

: This study looks at the biochemical disease free<br />

survival <strong>of</strong> a Real Time Intraoperative Planned (RTIOP) 3D Image<br />

Guided <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> Boost within a Permanent Seed Implant (PSI)<br />

and compares to our standard RTIOP approach. Could an inverse<br />

planned focalized boost to the known pathologic disease sites improve<br />

local DFS while protecting sensitive zone within the GTV?<br />

: Using a high precision 3D US implant<br />

guidance, we planned and implanted a boost area to multiple core<br />

biopsies sites within the prostate. 1617 localized prostate cancer<br />

patients (median age = 64 years old), were consecutively treated with<br />

RTIOP/PSI. Starting in 2003, 203 (BG) had prostate topographic biopsy<br />

results and a boost was delivered to the dominant involved lesion<br />

(DIL). 1414 patients were treated without boost. Treatment delivery<br />

was made using an integrated system with 3D ultrasound, RTIOP<br />

dosimetry and robotic seed delivery (FIRST, Nucletron). Plans were<br />

generated using a simulated annealing inverse planning algorithm<br />

(IPSA). The planning objectives are a dose coverage <strong>of</strong> 144 Gy (PD)<br />

with margin <strong>of</strong> 34 mm. V150 (V200) covers ≤ 2/3(1/3) <strong>of</strong> the prostate<br />

volume. The urethra D<strong>10</strong> should received ≤216 Gy and the D5 should<br />

be ≤220 Gy. Finally, the boost volume (BV) is to be covered by 216 Gy.<br />

Toxicities were reported, compared and published. Biochemical<br />

disease free survival is presented and pattern <strong>of</strong> failure is described.<br />

: 203 (BG) localized prostate cancer were treated using a boost<br />

with RTIOP. They consisted in low risk for the majority. 7,9% being<br />

intermediate risk tumor according to D'Amico's risk definition. At<br />

42,97 (579) months median, only 3 failures were reported (cure rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> 98,5%). All 3 were metastatic disease at recurrence. One <strong>of</strong> them<br />

had prostatic biopsy, which did not reveal cancer. As compared to our<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 17<br />

reference cohort <strong>of</strong> 1414 patients, 95,4% were cured at a median<br />

followup <strong>of</strong> 57 (1194) months median. (Figure 1)<br />

: Considering a shorter followup, usage <strong>of</strong> a DIL Boost in<br />

permanent prostate cancer has proven to equally tolerate and may<br />

well prove to give a better local control on the long run.<br />

<br />

OC39<br />

OUTCOME OF IMAGE GUIDED ADAPTIVE BRACHYTHERAPY IN LOCALLY<br />

ADVANCED CERVICAL CANCER<br />

J.C. Lindegaard 1 , L. Fokdal 1 , S.K. Nielsen 2 , L.L. Røhl 3 , E.M. Pedersen 3 ,<br />

L.K. Petersen 4 , E.S. Hansen 5 , K. Tanderup 6<br />

1<br />

Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Aarhus,<br />

Denmark<br />

2<br />

Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics, Aarhus,<br />

Denmark<br />

3<br />

Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology, Aarhus,<br />

Denmark<br />

4<br />

Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Gynecology, Aarhus,<br />

Denmark<br />

5<br />

Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Pathology, Aarhus,<br />

Denmark<br />

6<br />

Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus University, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Oncology Institute <strong>of</strong> Clinical Medicine, Aarhus, Denmark<br />

: Clinical outcome data are sparse on imaging<br />

guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in locally advanced cervical<br />

cancer. We report the results <strong>of</strong> our first 5 year experience with MRI<br />

based IGABT using the GEC ESTRO guidelines.<br />

: From 200620<strong>10</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 145 consecutive pts<br />

(median age 55 [2784]) were treated with IGABT. Five pts were<br />

excluded: 3 pts with aberrant histology/uncertain origin (2 clear cell,<br />

1 transitio cell) and 2 pts with distant progression during treatment.<br />

Histology <strong>of</strong> the 140 included pts showed squamous cell carcinoma in<br />

83%, adenocarcinoma in <strong>12</strong>% and adenosquamous carcinoma in 5%.<br />

FIGO stage distribution was: IB 11%, IIA 4%, IIB 55%, IIIA 5%, IIIB 19%,<br />

IVA 4% and IVB 2%. All pts received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT)<br />

4550 Gy/2530 fx. Concomitant weekly cisplatin was used in 1<strong>10</strong> pts<br />

(79%). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (24 courses <strong>of</strong> cisplatin, 5FU &<br />

ifosfamide) was employed in 8 pts with very advanced locoregional<br />

disease. PDRBT was given with 23 implants delivering <strong>10</strong>20 hourly<br />

pulses per BT fraction. Of the 300 implants, 188 (63%) were pure<br />

tandemring intracavitary implants and 1<strong>12</strong> (37%) consisted <strong>of</strong> a<br />

combined intracavitary/interstitial implant using the ring as template<br />

for transvaginal implantation <strong>of</strong> needles. A BT applicator guided<br />

stereotactic IMRT boost was used in 2 pts. Dose planning was based on<br />

1.5 or 3T MRI. Planning aim for the cumulative dose <strong>of</strong> EBRT+BT<br />

calculated as equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions was a D90 ≥ 85 Gy for<br />

high risk clinical target volume (HR CTV) (α/β=<strong>10</strong>, repair half time<br />

1.5h). For OAR the DVH constrains were 90 Gy for the minimal dose to<br />

the D2cc <strong>of</strong> bladder and 7075 Gy for the D2cc <strong>of</strong> rectum, sigmoid and<br />

bowel (α/β=3, repair half time 1.5h).<br />

: Planning aim for HR CTV was reached in 89% <strong>of</strong> the pts (Table<br />

1). The bladder constrain was respected in all pts whereas the 70 Gy<br />

constraint for rectum, sigmoid and bowel was realised in 87%, 79% and<br />

92% <strong>of</strong> the pts, respectively. D2cc > 75 Gy for rectum and sigmoid was<br />

found in 1% and 2% <strong>of</strong> the pts. Median followup time was 31 months.<br />

Five pts had persistent disease and 5 pts developed local recurrence.<br />

Local control (LC), cancer specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) at 3<br />

years was 91%, 86% and 78%, respectively. HR CTV D90 ≥ 90.4 Gy<br />

(median) was prognostic for LC (p=0.0004), CSS (p=0.027) and OS<br />

(p=0.024) in univariate analysis. HR CTV volume < 29.6 cc (median)<br />

was prognostic for LC (p=0.006) and CSS (P=0.016) but not for OS.<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> HR CTV dose and HR CTV volume on LC is shown in Figure<br />

1. Actuarial late G3G4 morbidity (CTCv3.0) for bladder, rectum,<br />

sigmoid and/or bowel was 5% (3 pts). Vaginal G3 morbidity (stenosis)<br />

was seen in 4 pts with vaginal involvement at diagnosis.<br />

DVH Parameter Mean (Gy, EQD2) SD<br />

HR CTV D90 91.0 5.9<br />

IR CTV D90 67.5 6.5<br />

Bladder, ICRU point 65.9 9.2<br />

Bladder D2cc 71.0 6.3<br />

Rectum, ICRU point 65.9 6.8<br />

Rectum D2cc 64.0 5.4<br />

Sigmoid D2cc 65.3 6.0<br />

Bowel D2cc * 60.8 6.6<br />

*<br />

D2cc for bowel only systematically reported since September 2008<br />

(72 pts)<br />

: We confirm that MRI guided IGABT provides a high dose<br />

to the tumour and a low dose to OAR resulting in excellent local<br />

control and survival with very limited late morbidity even in extensive<br />

disease.<br />

OC40<br />

IMAGE GUIDED BRACHYTHERAPY ENDS THE DEBATE OF SYSTEMATIC<br />

RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY IN LOCALLY ADVANCED CERVICAL CANCER<br />

R. Mazeron 1 , J. Gilmore 1 , I. Dumas 2 , J. Champoudry 2 , J. Goulart 1 , B.<br />

Vanneste 1 , A. Tailleur 1 , P. Morice 3 , C. HaieMeder 1<br />

1 Institut Gustave Roussy, Radiation Oncology, Villejuif, France<br />

2 Institut Gustave Roussy, Medical Physics, Villejuif, France<br />

3 Institut Gustave Roussy, Surgical Oncology, Villejuif, France<br />

: To evaluate the outcomes <strong>of</strong> 3D image guided<br />

brachytherapy (IGABT) after concomitant chemoradiation (CCT) in<br />

locally advanced cervical cancer.<br />

: As part <strong>of</strong> the retroEMBRACE revisory group,<br />

clinical data from patients treated at Institut GustaveRoussy from<br />

2004 to 2009 with curative intent IGABT after CCT were reviewed.<br />

Patients received pelvic +/ paraaortic CCT (4550.4 Gy) followed by<br />

MRI or CT guided pulsed dose rate BT. BT was performed according to<br />

GECESTRO guidelines. Additional nodal or parametrial EBRT boosts<br />

were performed when indicated. In a first period, stage I or II patients<br />

systematically underwent radical hysterectomy or were <strong>of</strong>fered a<br />

randomized study comparing hysterectomy versus observation in case<br />

<strong>of</strong> complete remission. Following the results <strong>of</strong> this trial,<br />

hysterectomy was limited to salvage treatment.<br />

: Of 163 patients identified, 27% had stage 1B, 6% IIA, 51% IIB,<br />

3% IIIA, 9% IIIB and 3% IVA. At diagnosis, median tumour volume was 55<br />

cm 3 This abstract forms part <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>of</strong>ficial conference media programme<br />

and will be available on the day <strong>of</strong> presentation.<br />

(3269). Squamous cell carcinoma was the commonest histological<br />

subtype (87%). Nodal involvement was noticed in 37% <strong>of</strong> the patients;<br />

among them, 15% had para aortic involvement. Ninety percents<br />

received concomitant chemotherapy and 18% received pelvic plus<br />

paraaortic EBRT. BT was based on MRI in 88% <strong>of</strong> the cases and on CT


S18 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

for the remaining <strong>12</strong>%. Vaginal personalized mould was used in the<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> applications (95%), with an intracavitary technique in all<br />

cases except two. The doses delivered (EBRT + BT, in EqD2) were<br />

67.1+/6.4 Gy (α/β=<strong>10</strong>) to 90% <strong>of</strong> the IRCTV, 78.1+/9.6 Gy (α/β=<strong>10</strong>)<br />

to 90% <strong>of</strong> the HRCTV. The D2cc for the bladder, rectum and sigmoid<br />

were 67.8+/6.7 Gy, 58.8+/5.9 Gy and 58.3 Gy+/5.7 (α/β=3)<br />

respectively. Sixtyone patients (37%) underwent a radical<br />

hysterectomy. Macroscopic residual disease was found in 13 cases.<br />

With a median followup <strong>of</strong> 36 months (579), 45 patients had<br />

relapsed. Twelve local relapses were reported (5 central and 7 lateral<br />

+/ central), <strong>of</strong> which 4 were isolated. There were 22 nodal failures<br />

(<strong>10</strong> pelvic and <strong>12</strong> paraaortic) and 28 metastatic relapses. At the time<br />

<strong>of</strong> failure, 70.4% <strong>of</strong> the patients had distant metastasis, and this was<br />

isolated in more than a half. The 3 year OS and DFS were 84% and 73%<br />

respectively. Local control was 92% and pelvic control was 86%. Local<br />

control decreased in relation to the initial tumour width: 97% for<br />


S20 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

obtain comparable doses to the target volumes. Dose deescalation<br />

and normalisation to a HR CTV D90 <strong>of</strong> 85 Gy resulted in low point A<br />

doses in a significant number <strong>of</strong> patients. Studying dose deescalation<br />

for small tumours at BT and reducing the vaginal loading may be a<br />

further step for better therapeutic gain. This hypothesis needs to be<br />

tested in a prospective clinical study.<br />

OC45<br />

FEASIBILITY OF ADC MAPPING IN ASSESSMENT OF TUMOR RESPONSE IN<br />

MRIBASED HDR BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CERVICAL CANCER<br />

K. Hosseinzadeh 1 , M.S. Rajagopalan 2 , S. Beriwal 2<br />

1<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh Medical Center, Radiology, Pittsburgh PA,<br />

USA<br />

2<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology,<br />

Pittsburgh PA, USA<br />

: GECESTRO recommends T2weighted MRI for<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> residual disease and 3D high doserate brachytherapy<br />

(HDRBT) planning for cervical cancer. It can be difficult to distinguish<br />

radiation changes from residual tumor on this sequence. Diffusion<br />

weighted imaging (DWI) is sensitive to diffusion <strong>of</strong> water molecules in<br />

tissue and has shown promise in characterizing pathological processes<br />

at a microscopic level. Tumor cell death and corresponding changes in<br />

water homeostasis are reflected in increased apparent diffusion<br />

coefficients (ADC) on DWI. The goal <strong>of</strong> this study was to determine the<br />

feasibility <strong>of</strong> ADC mapping with ring and tandem applicator in place<br />

and to compare the response to therapy with conventional T2<br />

weighted sequence.<br />

: Patients diagnosed with cervical cancer<br />

underwent MRIbased HDRBT. PreEBRT MRI (preRT MRI) was<br />

compared to the final treatment planning MRI during HDRBT (postRT<br />

MRI). Patients without T2 signal abnormality on any postRT MRI were<br />

excluded from the study. All studies were interpreted by a board<br />

certified radiologist experienced in pelvic MRI. Signal intensity was<br />

measured in the tumor volume (T2Tumor) and in the psoas muscle<br />

(T2Psoas) by drawing a region<strong>of</strong>interest. In a similar fashion,<br />

corresponding tumor ADC values were measured. The T2 signal <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tumor was then normalized by calculating the ratio between T2<br />

Tumor and T2Psoas (T2Ratio). Treatment response was determined<br />

using a paired ttest for T2 Tumor, T2ratio, and ADC values.<br />

: 11 patients with both preRT and postRT MRI performed at<br />

the same institution were included. Average age was 48.9 years and<br />

91% had squamous cell histology. In the postRT images, T2Tumor<br />

was significantly lower than that in the preRT images (418.5 vs.<br />

605.6, p=0.03) and there was no difference in T2Psoas. T2Ratio<br />

demonstrated a statistically significant decrease with treatment (1.7<br />

vs. 2.6, p=0.04). In three patients in whom the T2Tumor increased in<br />

the postRT study (mean: +37.8%), the T2Ratio decreased (mean: <br />

38.4%). ADC values demonstrated a highly significant increase with<br />

treatment (1509.9 vs. <strong>10</strong>37.0, p


S22 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Spain<br />

4 Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Oncologia Medica, Pamplona, Spain<br />

: To determine the impact <strong>of</strong> implant sequence<br />

(perioperative vs. postoperative) in patients with resected squamous<br />

cell head and neck cancer treated with adjuvant HDR brachytherapy.<br />

: From 2000 to 2011, 78 patients (57 men and<br />

21 women, median age 57 years, range, 3293) were implanted either<br />

at the time <strong>of</strong> surgery (Perioperative Group) or at a variable length <strong>of</strong><br />

time after surgery (Postoperative Group). Both groups were well<br />

matched with regards to the quality <strong>of</strong> the surgical margins. One third<br />

<strong>of</strong> the cases received HDR brachytherapy as the only adjuvant to a<br />

total dose <strong>of</strong> 32 Gy in 8 b.i.d treatments for R0 resections and 40 Gy<br />

in <strong>10</strong> b.i.d treatments for R1 resections. Twothirds <strong>of</strong> the cases<br />

received HDR brachytherapy to a total dose <strong>of</strong> 16 Gy for R0 resections<br />

and 24 Gy in 6 b.i.d treatments for R1 resections combined with a<br />

median <strong>of</strong> 45Gy <strong>of</strong> External Irradiation (EBRT) or chemoradiation.<br />

: The entire treatment length (surgery to end <strong>of</strong> irradiation)<br />

was shorter in perioperative patients than in postoperative patients<br />

(71 days vs. 98.5 days; p=0.0001). The rate <strong>of</strong> Grade ≥3 RTOG<br />

complications in perioperative and postoperative patients were 44.2%<br />

and 23.1%, respectively (p=0.088). After a median followup <strong>of</strong> 7.1<br />

years (0.6<strong>10</strong>.9), the <strong>10</strong>year actuarial local control rates in<br />

perioperative and postoperative patients were 85.4% and 73.3%,<br />

respectively (p=ns) and the <strong>10</strong>year actuarial locoregional control<br />

rates were 78.2% and 45.2%, respectively (p=0.01). Diseasefree<br />

survival rates in perioperative and postoperative patients at <strong>10</strong> years<br />

were 54.1% and 15.8% (p=ns) and overall survival rates at <strong>10</strong> years<br />

were 62.4% and 15.5%, respectively (p=ns).<br />

: The use <strong>of</strong> perioperative brachytherapy allows an earlier<br />

completion <strong>of</strong> the adjuvant irradiation program. This may be an<br />

advantage in terms <strong>of</strong> locoregional control although at the expense <strong>of</strong><br />

an increased toxicity.<br />

OC53<br />

FROM LOW DOSE RATE TO HIGH DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY IN LIP<br />

CARCINOMA: SAME RESULTS BUT LESS COMPLICATIONS<br />

J.L. Guinot 1 , L. Arribas 1 , M.I. Tortajada 1 , M. Carrascosa 1 , M. Santos 1 ,<br />

P. Soler 1 , A. Mut 1 , C. Pesudo 1 , M.L. Chust 1<br />

1<br />

Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Valencia, Spain<br />

: Low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy (BT) has been<br />

used during several decades to treat lip carcinomas. Nowadays it has<br />

been replaced by high dose rate (HDR) but very few cases have been<br />

reported in the literature. We compare our experience with LDR and<br />

HDR in lip carcinoma in a single institution.<br />

: From 1990 to 1997, 99 patients with invasive<br />

lip carcinoma were treated with LDR BT and from 1999 to 20<strong>10</strong>, <strong>10</strong>4<br />

consecutive patients were treated with HDR BT. Mean age was 67 and<br />

72 years old. Distribution by stage T1, T2, T3, T4 was 53.5%, 15.1%,<br />

3.1%, 28.3% with LDR and 52.9%, 32,7%, 0%, 14,4% with HDR. N0 were<br />

92.9% and 92.3% respectively. Some cases were treated after surgery<br />

with positive margin (34.3% with LDR and 16.3% with HDR) and with<br />

external beam radiation therapy plus BT (8.1% vs 2.9%). Parallel<br />

metallic needles in a triangle shape fixed with templates were used in<br />

<strong>10</strong>0% <strong>of</strong> HDR and 76% <strong>of</strong> LDR cases, and plastic tubes in 24% <strong>of</strong> LDR<br />

cases. All HDR patients were treated in five days, most <strong>of</strong> them with 9<br />

fractions <strong>of</strong> 4.55 Gy at 90% isodose, twice a day, to a total dose <strong>of</strong><br />

40.545 Gy.<br />

: The median followup was 63 and 51 months with LDR and<br />

HDR BT. Five patients suffered local relapse in each group. Overall<br />

local control, in T1, T2 and T4 were 94.9%, <strong>10</strong>0%, 86.6%, 89.3% with<br />

LDR and 95.2%, <strong>10</strong>0%, 94.1%, 80% with HDR. With surgical salvage,<br />

definitive local control was 97% and 98.1% respectively. Disease free<br />

survival was 95.9% vs 94.2%. S<strong>of</strong>t tissue necrosis and bone necrosis<br />

were 15.1% and 1% with LDR but with HDR there was no case <strong>of</strong><br />

necrosis. A fair or bad cosmetic result was described in 11.1% <strong>of</strong> LDR<br />

cases but none <strong>of</strong> HDR cases.<br />

: Both series are similar in characteristics. HDR BT with<br />

rigid needles is a simple technique with very good long term results<br />

and very few complications with nine fractions during five days. Local<br />

control and disease free survival are just the same with LDR and HDR,<br />

but late complications are minimal with HDR and less than with LDR<br />

BT. Cosmetic results are better due to the excellent dose<br />

homogeneity, therefore HDR BT can be recommended as a standard in<br />

lip carcinoma with this treatment regimen.<br />

OC54<br />

LONG TERM OUTCOMES OF INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY IN SOFT<br />

TISSUE SARCOMAS<br />

S. Laskar 1 , A. Puri 2 , A. Gulia 2 , B. Rekhi 3 , S. Juvekar 4 , S. Desai 3 , S.<br />

Desai 4 , S. Gupta 5 , J. Ghosh 5 , N. Jambhekar 3<br />

1<br />

Tata Memorial Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Mumbai, India<br />

2<br />

Tata Memorial Hospital, Surgical Oncology, Mumbai, India<br />

3<br />

Tata Memorial Hospital, Pathology, Mumbai, India<br />

4<br />

Tata Memorial Hospital, Radiology, Mumbai, India<br />

5<br />

Tata Memorial Hospital, Medical Oncology, Mumbai, India<br />

: To evaluate the clinical outcomes & long term<br />

adverse effects <strong>of</strong> interstitial brachytherapy (BRT) for adult patients<br />

with s<strong>of</strong>t tissue sarcomas (STS).<br />

: From July 1990 to June 2008, 198 patients<br />

(median age 42 years, range 1890) with STS received BRT as part <strong>of</strong><br />

locoregional treatment at our institute. There were <strong>12</strong>8 males and 70<br />

females, majority (n=138, 69.6%) had primary lesions. Spindle cell<br />

sarcoma (26%) was the commonest histological type, and 52.5% had<br />

highgrade sarcomas. Treatment included wide local excision followed<br />

by BRT with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Eighty one<br />

patients (41%) received BRT alone.<br />

: The <strong>10</strong>year local control (LC), diseasefree survival (DFS),<br />

and overall survival (OS) were 77.1%, 62.6%, and 70.8%, respectively.<br />

Patients receiving a combination <strong>of</strong> BRT and EBRT had comparable LC<br />

to those receiving BRT alone (76.1% vs. 81.6%, p=0.081). There was no<br />

significant difference in LC for patients receiving LDR vs. HDR BRT<br />

(75.1% vs. 80.9%, p=0.<strong>12</strong>0). Postbrachytherapy, surgical wound<br />

healing complications was seen in 26 (13.1%) patients<br />

(delay/dehiscence: n = 15, wound infection: n =11). The 5yr<br />

cumulative incidence (CI) <strong>of</strong> RT related late toxicity was 28.5%<br />

(Subcutaneous fibrosis: 26.4%, limb oedema 7.4%, joint<br />

stiffness/arthritis: 6.6%, osteoradionecrosis: 2.4%, fracture: 2.4%).<br />

There was a trend towards reduction in late toxicity with the use <strong>of</strong><br />

BRT alone (5yr CI: 19.5% vs. 32.4%, p=0.081). One patient developed a<br />

second cancer (OGS). There were no BRT related vascular or nerve<br />

injuries.<br />

: Interstitial BRT with or without EBRT results in excellent<br />

outcome for patients with STS. Radical BRT alone, when used<br />

judiciously in select group <strong>of</strong> patients, results in excellent local<br />

control and functional outcome with reduced treatmentrelated<br />

morbidity.<br />

OC55<br />

LONGTERM RESULTS OF PDR BRACHYTHERAPY AS A BOOST IN<br />

SQUAMOUS CELL CANCERS OF THE ANAL CANAL<br />

D.P. Peiffert 1 , A. Haddad 1 , L. Rangeard 1 , I. Buchheit 2 , S. Huger 2 ,<br />

A.S. Baumann 1 , S. Oldrini 1<br />

1<br />

Centre Alexis Vautrin, Radiation Oncology, Vandoeuvre les Nancy,<br />

France<br />

2<br />

Centre Alexis Vautrin, Medical Physics, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France<br />

: Squamous cell cancers <strong>of</strong> the anal canal are<br />

generally managed with sphincterpreserving external beam<br />

radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. The boost to the primary<br />

tumour can be given with brachytherapy, thereby decreasing dose and<br />

toxicity to the tissues surrounding the anal canal. Previously, a<br />

National multicenter study demonstrated the feasibility <strong>of</strong><br />

brachytherapy using pulseddose rate delivery. We hereby report the<br />

longterm results <strong>of</strong> a large cohort <strong>of</strong> patients treated with this<br />

technique at a single center.<br />

: 99 patients with squamous or basaloid<br />

histology were treated between 1996 and 2007 in a sphincter<br />

preserving schedule by pelvic irradiation with a PDR brachytherapy<br />

boost. Cancers <strong>of</strong> the anal margin or with other histology were not<br />

included in this study. External beam radiotherapy <strong>of</strong> the pelvis<br />

delivered 45 Gy in 25 fractions <strong>of</strong> 1.8 Gy ( range 36 to 50.4 Gy with<br />

1,8 to 3,0 Gy per fraction). After a mean gap <strong>of</strong> 25 days, a PDR<br />

brachytherapy boost delivered a dose <strong>of</strong> 20 Gy (range <strong>10</strong>20Gy) with<br />

0.5 Gy per pulse every hour using a ring template with one plane <strong>of</strong> 3<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 23<br />

to 6 needles spaced at <strong>10</strong>mm . 58% <strong>of</strong> patients also received<br />

chemotherapy during the initial phase <strong>of</strong> treatment. Charts were<br />

retrospectively evaluated for local tumour control and long term<br />

toxicity.<br />

: Median followup for this cohort was 54 months. Clinical<br />

exam was performed by the brachytherapist every 3 months during<br />

the 2 first years, and every 6 months later. 85% <strong>of</strong> patients were<br />

female, and mean age was 62 years. Stage distribution was 15%, 69%,<br />

<strong>12</strong>% and 4% for T1, T2, T3 and T4, respectively. AJCC TNM staging was<br />

14%, 56% and 30% for stage I, II and III, respectively. Most commonly<br />

used chemotherapy regimen was cisplatinum and 5FU delivered<br />

during weeks 1 and 5 <strong>of</strong> the irradiation. 15 local recurrences were<br />

recorded, <strong>of</strong> which 6 were isolated. Recurrence rates by T stage were<br />

7%, 15% and 25% for T1, T2 and T3/4 tumours. Of 37 patients with T1<br />

2N0 tumours who did not undergo prophylactic inguinal irradiation, 5<br />

(14%) inguinal failures were recorded. Late grade 3 or 4 toxicity was<br />

as follows: 1 stool incontinence, 1 anal stenosis, and 11 s<strong>of</strong>t tissue<br />

necrosis. The actuarial colostomy free survival and prognostic factors<br />

will be presented.<br />

: Treatment <strong>of</strong> anal canal squamous carcinomas by PDR<br />

brachytherapy boost after external beam radiotherapy results in good<br />

local control rates comparable to historical series. The afterloading<br />

setup for PDR delivery is a safer alternative in terms <strong>of</strong> radiation<br />

exposure, and makes it the technique <strong>of</strong> choice to prescribe the dose<br />

rate and optimise the dose distribution, and is used in routine in our<br />

department.<br />

OC56<br />

BLADDER SPARING APPROACH WITH BRACHYTHERAPY IN <strong>10</strong>40<br />

PATIENTS<br />

B. Pieters 1 , L. Blank 1 , C. Koedooder 1 , R. van Os 1 , M. van de Kar 1 , E.<br />

Jansen 1 , E. Geijsen 1 , C. Koning 1<br />

1<br />

AMC, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands<br />

<br />

: Several French, Belgian and Dutch radiation<br />

oncologists have reported good results with the combination <strong>of</strong><br />

limited surgery followed by external beam radiotherapy and<br />

brachytherapy in early stage muscleinvasive bladder cancer. This<br />

approach has seldom been followed by others. This retrospective<br />

observational study investigates treatment outcome in the largest<br />

cohort <strong>of</strong> patients treated by brachytherapy for early stage muscle<br />

invasive bladder cancer.<br />

: Data from <strong>12</strong> out <strong>of</strong> 13 departments in The<br />

Netherlands using this approach have been collected and imported in<br />

a multicenter database The number <strong>of</strong> patients <strong>of</strong> this cohort was<br />

<strong>10</strong>40.<br />

Patients were treated by external beam radiotherapy (<strong>10</strong>55 Gy) and<br />

brachytherapy (2540 Gy and 5060 Gy). In 247 cases a partial<br />

cystectomy was performed.<br />

Results were analyzed according to tumor stage and diameter,<br />

histology grade, age and brachytherapy technique (Continuous Low<br />

Dose Rate (CLDR) and Pulsed Dose Rate (PDR)).<br />

: The age <strong>of</strong> patients ranged from 28 to 92 years. The gender<br />

distribution was 811 males and 229 females. There were 2 pT0, <strong>12</strong>6<br />

pT1, 797 pT2, <strong>10</strong>0 pT3, 1 pT4, and 8 pTx tumors. The distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

differentiation grade was 13 well, 167 moderately, 824 poorly, and 16<br />

undifferentiated.<br />

At 1, 3, and 5 years local control rates were 91%, 80%, and 75%,<br />

metastasisfree survival rates were 91%, 80%, and 74%, diseasefree<br />

survival rates were 85%, 68%, and 61% and overall survival rates were<br />

91%, 74%, and 62%, respectively. There were 136 patients with local<br />

recurrences only, 94 with both local recurrence and distant<br />

metastases and 145 with distant metastases only. Of the 232 local<br />

recurrences 49 were muscle invasive, 90 were nonmuscle invasive, 31<br />

both invasive and noninvasive, and 62 were unknown. Cystectomy as<br />

salvage treatment was performed in 60 patients.<br />

The differences in outcome between the contributing departments<br />

were small. After multivariate analysis the only factor influencing the<br />

local control rate was the brachytherapy technique in favor <strong>of</strong> PDR<br />

(HR 0.46; P = 0.004).<br />

: External beam radiotherapy followed by brachytherapy,<br />

combined with limited surgery <strong>of</strong>fers good results in terms <strong>of</strong> local<br />

control and bladder sparing for selected groups <strong>of</strong> patients suffering<br />

from earlystage muscle invasive bladder cancer. These patients<br />

should be counseled on the possibility for a bladder sparing procedure<br />

by the use <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy.<br />

All participating centers are acknowledged for the contribution:<br />

University Medical Center Utrecht, University Medical Center<br />

Groningen, Medical Center Haaglanden, Medisch Spectrum Twente,<br />

Institute Verbeeten, Radiotherapeutic Institute RISO, The Netherlands<br />

Cancer Institute / Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, University<br />

Medical Center Leiden, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Arnhem<br />

Radiotherapeutic Institute, Radiotherapeutic Institute Friesland,<br />

Academic Medical Center Amsterdam<br />

<br />

<br />

57<br />

PARTIAL BREAST IRRADIATION: FROM THE US SIDE<br />

R. Kuske 1<br />

1 Arizona Cancer Specialists, <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Scottsdale, USA<br />

<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> was the first method <strong>of</strong> breast irradiation. Radium<br />

needle brachytherapy was successfully used to treat breast cancer<br />

more than 50 years prior to the widespread use <strong>of</strong> linear accelerators<br />

to treat the entire breast. Indeed, Ge<strong>of</strong>frey Keynes, British Surgeon<br />

and brother to the famous economist John <strong>May</strong>nard Keynes, published<br />

his breastpreserving outcomes in 1938 in the British Medical Journal.<br />

His patients were treated with radium needles during the 1920s and<br />

1930s. His remarkable conclusion was stated in this historically<br />

important manuscript: “These results (with radium needle breast<br />

brachytherapy) compare favorably with the classic Halsted radical<br />

mastectomy.”<br />

In the US, modern breast brachytherapy began at the Ochsner Clinic in<br />

New Orleans, LA, in 1991. In our multidisciplinary clinic, a<br />

Venezuelan woman with T2N0M0 right breast cancer insisted upon a<br />

treatment option that “can return me to work and my family in one<br />

week.” Drawing on our brachytherapy experience with s<strong>of</strong>t tissue<br />

sarcoma after a compartmental resection, we delivered 45 Gy in 4<br />

days with low doserate Iridium192 to a target volume 2 cm beyond<br />

the surgical cavity edge.<br />

Pleased with the results in this original patient, we wrote a Phase II<br />

prospective clinical trial investigating 45 days widevolume breast<br />

brachytherapy as an alternative to conventional 6week whole breast<br />

irradiation in select breast cancers. This study accrured 162 patients<br />

and was initially reported in a matchedpair analysis.<br />

Two years later, William Beaumont Hospital in Michigan initiated a<br />

similar prospective Phase II clinical trial that has been widely<br />

published with similar longterm outcomes. In 1995, I designed and<br />

wrote RTOG 9517, the first modern multiinstitutional phase II<br />

clinical trial with interstitial bracytherapy PBI. This trial accrued<br />

briskly with excellent local control rates <strong>of</strong> 96% at 5 years and 95% at<br />

7 years. Current investigators do not give any credence to the earlier<br />

Guy’s Hospital Trial (Fentiman) or the Christie Hospital trial (Ribeiro)<br />

because <strong>of</strong> poor patient selection and absent quality control <strong>of</strong><br />

bracytherapy/electron beam dosimetry or target volume coverage.<br />

Interstitial brachytherapy was considered by many to be too skill<br />

dependent and invasive. These concerns spawned the MammoSite<br />

balloon catheter in 2002. The simplicity <strong>of</strong> this singlechannel single<br />

entry brachytherapy device popularized PBI in the US. Other single<br />

entry devices, such as the multichannel SAVI and Contura catheters,<br />

soon came into practice across the US, allowing more refined dose<br />

shaping. The ability to pull the brachytherapy dose cloud away from<br />

the skin is considered a major improvement, and further increased PBI<br />

use in the US. It is currently estimated that up to 20% <strong>of</strong> eligible<br />

patients are receiving PBI in many areas <strong>of</strong> the US.<br />

The ultimate test <strong>of</strong> a new treatment or potential paradigm shift is<br />

considered to be the prospective randomized clinical trial. NSABP B<br />

39/RTOG 0413 has accrued 4050 out <strong>of</strong> a planned 4300 women as <strong>of</strong><br />

January 20<strong>12</strong>. This study may close in January, 2013. There are<br />

currently 9 phase III clinical trials investigating PBI across the world,<br />

attesting to the significance <strong>of</strong> this concept to patients and<br />

oncologists alike. Singledose intraoperative methods <strong>of</strong> delivering<br />

PBI, such as Intrabeam and intraoperative electrons, are also under<br />

investigation.


S24 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

In summary, a 21year experience with PBI in the US has inspired a<br />

plethora <strong>of</strong> scientific endeavors. Lumpectomy, sentinel node<br />

mapping, and PBI may <strong>of</strong>fer women with select breast cancers the<br />

highest quality <strong>of</strong> life and breast conservation.<br />

58<br />

PARTIAL BREAST IRRADIATION: FROM THE EUROPEAN SIDE<br />

E. Van Limbergen<br />

University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium<br />

Abstract not received<br />

<br />

<br />

59<br />

HOW CAN BRACHYTHERAPY BE MORE SYSTEMATICALLY USED IN<br />

EMERGING COUNTRIES<br />

R. Bilimagga 1<br />

1<br />

Bangalore Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Bangalore,<br />

India<br />

This can be broadly divided into<br />

a) Resources (Equipment and Manpower)<br />

b) Policies<br />

c) Strategies<br />

a) RESOURCES (Equipment and Manpower)<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> the financial resource crunch in these countries, we have to<br />

consider several factors to help brachytherapy be used more<br />

systematically in the emerging economies. Some <strong>of</strong> these<br />

considerations would be :<br />

1 ) Identifying common cancers occurring in a specific geographic<br />

location helps in choosing an appropriate brachytherapy equipment<br />

for a defined population.<br />

2) Choosing a long halflife brachytherapy isotope will reduce the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> source change expenses (Eg : Cobalt≈Iridium).<br />

3) Efficacy <strong>of</strong> Xray based brachytherapy to reduce the cost<br />

4) Number <strong>of</strong> channels in HDR (3≈18 or more) Lower channels can be<br />

selected.<br />

5) In areas where the patient volume is less, LDR (Low dose rate)<br />

brachytherapy can be used & HDR (High dose rate) can be used where<br />

high volume is present.<br />

6) Cost <strong>of</strong> the manpower training can be reduced by imparting local<br />

onsite training through collaborations with the vendors or through<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional associations like IBS (Indian <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> Society).<br />

7) The use <strong>of</strong> an ultrasound machine instead <strong>of</strong> CT scanner for imaging<br />

can substantially reduce the cost wherever CT Scanner installation is<br />

not cost effective.<br />

b) POLICIES<br />

Certain Government policies will be helpful in reducing the costs.<br />

a) Optimum use <strong>of</strong> space can be achieved by the use <strong>of</strong> Teletherapy<br />

room for <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> also.<br />

b) Life saving equipments like brachytherapy machines must be<br />

exempted from import duty.<br />

c) Accessories can be manufactured locally with guidance from<br />

Vendors instead <strong>of</strong> importing them.<br />

d) Cost to the patients can be subsidized through national insurance<br />

health policies and by participating philanthropists.<br />

e) Portable brachytherapy machines which can be moved between<br />

different centers will help in resource sharing.<br />

f) The life <strong>of</strong> the HDR source can be extended by using it as a PDR<br />

(Pulsed dose rate) and LDR (Low dose rate) source, after the activity<br />

comes down.<br />

g) <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> facility costing must be included upfront in the<br />

initial Radiotherapy oncology project planning.<br />

c) STRATEGIES<br />

The Government, vendors, private <strong>org</strong>anizations, NGO’s and medical<br />

schools can adopt important cost saving strategies.<br />

a) Networking <strong>of</strong> cancer centers can be done through HUB and spoke<br />

model.<br />

b) Equipment and sources can be procured by the government (3 tier<br />

model).<br />

c) Free standing brachytherapy facility in cities with a centralized<br />

treatment planning will be helpful in a resource sharing model.<br />

60<br />

NORTH AMERICA<br />

D. Beyer<br />

Arizona Oncology Services, Scottsdale, USA<br />

Abstract not received<br />

61<br />

AUSTRALIAN PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

J. Miller<br />

Alfred Health, Radiation Oncology, Melbourne, Australia<br />

Australia is 95% <strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> the continental USA, but has a<br />

population <strong>of</strong> 23,000,000. About twothirds <strong>of</strong> this population live in<br />

the eight capital cities <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the component Australian States or<br />

Territories. Australia has a higher GDP per capita than the United<br />

States. The health care system in Australia is a mixed private and<br />

public scheme: a Federal Governmentfunded insurance scheme<br />

(Medicare Benefits Scheme, or MBS) provides funding for universal<br />

cover delivered by a public hospital system overseen by each State <br />

or by subsidising care to patients in a private inpatient or ambulatory<br />

setting, independent <strong>of</strong> the individual Staterun "public hospitals". To<br />

supplement and support this Government system, about 45% <strong>of</strong><br />

Australians purchase private health insurance in a competitive<br />

market, allowing these people funded access to a private hospital and<br />

to a private health careprovider system.<br />

There are almost 20 000 cases a year <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer in Australia,<br />

and 3000 deaths. About 5000 men a year have low risk disease at<br />

diagnosis. Most treatment modalities are available for men with<br />

prostate cancer in Australia: active surveillance, radical<br />

prostatectomy (including robotassisted), external beam radiotherapy,<br />

both high and low doserate brachytherapy, hormonal and<br />

chemotherapy treatments. Proton treatment is not available; HIFU<br />

and cryotherapy are available but not common.<br />

In the period 7/20096/20<strong>10</strong> there were over 6000 prostatectomies in<br />

Australia, while there were about <strong>12</strong>00 I<strong>12</strong>5 seed implants.<br />

Transperineal TRUSguided permanent seed implants commenced in<br />

Australia in 1997, in Perth. No Governmentinsurance funding was<br />

available until the procedure was approved for men with NCCN low<br />

risk disease in 2001, after an expert panel review <strong>of</strong> the evidence for<br />

safety and efficacy. In 2006 a further similar review extended the<br />

allowable indications for seed brachytherapy to include men with GS 7<br />

disease. The growth in numbers and brachytherapy centres has been<br />

steady, to now include 15 centres nationally, in most states or<br />

territories. Only iodine<strong>12</strong>5 permanent seeds are easily available for<br />

clinical use in Australia; palladium and caesium are not used.<br />

The procedure is not, however, available free<strong>of</strong>charge to men in the<br />

public hospital system in all States, and is effectively rationed where<br />

it is available. The majority <strong>of</strong> men implanted in Australia are<br />

privatelyinsured patients, having procedures in private hospitals, and<br />

bearing significant out<strong>of</strong>pocket costs above the fixed MBS subsidy.<br />

The calculated cost to the MBS, other government agencies, and by<br />

either the patient or private insurer in Australia for treatment and<br />

<strong>10</strong> years followup is very similar in either the private or public<br />

sectors, and between modalities, ranging from AUS$ <strong>12</strong>,900 for EBRT<br />

(and no androgen deprivation), through AUS$ 13,<strong>10</strong>0 for a seed<br />

implant, to AUS$ 14,800 for a radical prostatectomy (nonrobot).<br />

There is, however, a major difference in the allocation <strong>of</strong> costs, with<br />

inpatient costs being the driver for RP, and the seed cost the driver<br />

for brachytherapy.<br />

Seed brachytherapy has become a standard <strong>of</strong> care treatment for men<br />

with lowrisk or "good" intermediaterisk disease in Australia, but is<br />

unevenly available for reasons that relate to history, economics, the<br />

regulatory arrangements <strong>of</strong> the Australian health care system,<br />

allocation <strong>of</strong> costs, and the number and distribution <strong>of</strong> prostate<br />

cancer specialists in the various disciplines.<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 25<br />

62<br />

EUROPE<br />

Y. Lievens<br />

University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium<br />

Abstract not received<br />

63<br />

SOUTH AMERICA<br />

M. de la Torre<br />

CeDeTe, Buenos Aires, Argentina<br />

Abstract not received<br />

64<br />

THE ROLE OF INDUSTRY IN DEVELOPING COSTEFFECTIVE<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

E. Rosenblatt 1<br />

1<br />

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency, Applied Radiation Biology<br />

and Radiotherapy Section, Vienna, Austria<br />

<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> has become increasingly popular and highly tied to<br />

technological development. The increasing popularity <strong>of</strong><br />

brachytherapy is a direct consequence <strong>of</strong> its effectiveness in the cure<br />

or palliation <strong>of</strong> various forms <strong>of</strong> cancer. But also, the increasing<br />

dependence <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy on complex technology, determines a<br />

corresponding increase in costs.<br />

Costeffectiveness analyses relate the additional cost to its<br />

incremental impact on any clinically relevant measure <strong>of</strong> benefit.<br />

Because one <strong>of</strong> the primary uses <strong>of</strong> economic analysis is to allocate<br />

limited resources among diverse interventions, benefit has to be<br />

measured in units that are universally applicable to all interventions.<br />

“Years<strong>of</strong>lifesaved” is the most commonly used measure. When<br />

calculating “costeffectiveness” then, only cost and survival must be<br />

measured. A treatment’s costeffectiveness ratio is calculated by<br />

dividing its incremental cost by its incremental impact on survival as<br />

compared to the most reasonable alternative treatment. The result <strong>of</strong><br />

this rate is then expressed in dollars per years<strong>of</strong>lifesaved.<br />

Interventions costing less than an additional U$ 50.000 per year<strong>of</strong><br />

lifesaved are considered “costeffective”.<br />

The industry has traditionally had a key role in the development <strong>of</strong><br />

brachytherapy as we know it today. The brachytherapy industry now<br />

mostly gravitates around two main lines <strong>of</strong> production; [1] high dose<br />

rate (HDR) remote afterloaders and accessories, and [2] prostate<br />

brachytherapy systems. Demand by patients and physicians for<br />

innovations to help cancer patients, drives investment in<br />

biotechnologies given the potential pr<strong>of</strong>its. From the industry<br />

perspective, pricing <strong>of</strong> new cancer innovations is influenced by<br />

development costs (including risk at each stage <strong>of</strong> development)<br />

production costs, potential market size, pricing <strong>of</strong> comparables, and<br />

ultimately the novelty and value <strong>of</strong> the new product in the<br />

marketplace.<br />

Innovation in the brachytherapy field has to pay close attention to a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> issues such as the international basic safety standards as<br />

well as standards <strong>of</strong> safety determined by the ICRP, source<br />

characterization protocols, IEC compliance and compliance with the<br />

requirements <strong>of</strong> specific national or regional regulatory bodies such as<br />

the FDA in the US and the EURATOM Directives in the EU.<br />

The introduction <strong>of</strong> HDR brachytherapy allowed treatments to be<br />

given in minutes rather than days, replace hospital admissions by<br />

ambulatory treatments and eliminate the need for spinal or general<br />

anaesthesia, in other words; more costeffective brachytherapy.<br />

Economic analysis have shown that in departments that treat more<br />

than 300 new cases <strong>of</strong> cervical cancer per year, the use <strong>of</strong> HDR<br />

brachytherapy is clearly costeffective as compared with LDR. The<br />

equivalence <strong>of</strong> HDR vs. LDR in terms <strong>of</strong> clinical outcomes and<br />

toxicities has already been established in levelI evidence studies<br />

carried out in developed as well as developing countries.<br />

The miniaturisation <strong>of</strong> Cobalt60 sources, making them the same size<br />

<strong>of</strong> previously used Ir192 sources, was a clear and significant step<br />

towards a more costeffective brachytherapy. Other strategies to be<br />

discussed are accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and<br />

electronic brachytherapy.<br />

One possible approach that has been promoted by the IAEA through<br />

the AGaRT (“Advisory Group for increasing access to Radiotherapy<br />

Technology”) process is encouraging the manufacturers to develop<br />

packages <strong>of</strong> equipment fully compatible and which are sold at<br />

accessible prices. A typical package may include for example: the<br />

afterloader, a number <strong>of</strong> sources, a BT treatment planning system<br />

with s<strong>of</strong>tware, connectors and applicators, an imaging device, a<br />

service maintenance contract and training. Manufacturers have<br />

responded positively to this challenge, and the process moves<br />

forward.<br />

To make brachytherapy more costeffective then, the industry must<br />

come up with either treatments strategies or techniques that are<br />

more effective, resourcesparing or both, while at the same time<br />

keeping the high standards <strong>of</strong> safety that are the norm today.<br />

<br />

OC65<br />

DEVELOPMENT OF A WATER CALORIMETER AS A PRIMARY STANDARD<br />

FOR ABSORBED DOSE TO WATER FOR HDR BRACHYTHERAPY SOURCES<br />

L.A. de Prez 1 , J.A. de Pooter 1<br />

1 VSL Ionizing Radiation Standards, Delft, The Netherlands<br />

: Currently, dosimetry for brachytherapy sources is<br />

based on airkerma standards. In the framework <strong>of</strong> the iMERAplus JRP<br />

6, VSL is developing a water calorimeter for high dose rate (HDR)<br />

brachytherapy sources to measure directly the absorbed dose to<br />

water, Dw. Water calorimetry for HDR sources differs from water<br />

calorimetry for external beams on two main aspects. Firstly, due to<br />

the selfheating <strong>of</strong> the source an undesired temperature rise appears.<br />

Secondly, the radiation induced temperature signal is very sensitive to<br />

small variations in the HDRsource to thermistor distance. Methods to<br />

reduce these effects were implemented in the design <strong>of</strong> the<br />

calorimeter.<br />

: The developed water calorimeter is based on<br />

the existing water calorimeter for external beams with a newly<br />

developed high purity cell (HPC, see figure). The HDR source is<br />

positioned centrally inside the HPC. A nylon catheter on the central<br />

axis <strong>of</strong> the HPC is used for positioning <strong>of</strong> the source. The HPC is<br />

cylindrically shaped with two opposing thermistors on each side <strong>of</strong> the<br />

catheter. The distance between the thermistors and the centre <strong>of</strong> the<br />

catheter is 2.0 cm. To decrease the uncertainty <strong>of</strong> the temperature<br />

signal as a result <strong>of</strong> variations in the distance between catheter and<br />

thermistors, the measured temperature increase is averaged over the<br />

two thermistors. A cylindrical aluminum heat sink in a concentric<br />

configuration with the HPC is used to reduce the influence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

source selfheat on the temperature signal. The heat sink is separated<br />

from the inside <strong>of</strong> the HPC by the central PEEK cylinder. Due to the<br />

enhanced heat transport in the longitudinal direction <strong>of</strong> the heat sink,<br />

less heat generated in the HDR source (selfheat) reaches the<br />

thermistors. Monte Carlo (PENELOPE) and heat transport simulations<br />

(Comsol Multiphysics TM ) were performed to determine the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

source selfheat and resulting excess temperature effects.<br />

: Measurements performed with a Nucletron microSelectron V2<br />

HDR source showed good agreement with the modeled excess<br />

temperature effects for an initial temperature <strong>of</strong> source and cable <strong>of</strong><br />

respectively 13 °C and 17 °C. The resulting measured and modeled<br />

calorimeter drifts are shown in the figure. Presently the relevant<br />

correction factors are being examined in order to determine the<br />

aborbed dose rate and its final uncertainty budget.<br />

: The model calculations for the HDR water calorimeter<br />

are in good agreement with measurements. After establishing suitable<br />

correction factors with their final uncertainty budget, the calorimeter<br />

can be used for absorbed dose measurements <strong>of</strong> HDR brachytherapy<br />

sources.


S26 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

OC66<br />

QC OF LOWENERGY PHOTON BT SOURCES: RECOMMENDATIONS OF<br />

THE NETHERLANDS COMMISSION ON RADIATION DOSIMETRY (NCS)<br />

A. Rijnders 1 , A. Aalbers 2 , M. De Brabandere 3 , C. Koedooder 4 , M.A.<br />

Moerland 5 , B. Schaeken 6 , B. Thissen 7 , A. van 't Riet 8 , S. Vynckier 9<br />

1<br />

Europe Hospitals Sint Elisabeth, Radiotherapy, Brussels, Belgium<br />

2<br />

Van Swinden Laboratorium, Dosimetry, Delft, The Netherlands<br />

3<br />

UZ Leuven, Radiotherapy, Leuven, Belgium<br />

4<br />

AMC Amsterdam, Radiotherapy, Amsterdam, The Netherlands<br />

5<br />

UMC Utrecht, Radiotherapy, Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />

6<br />

URA Antwerpen, Radiotherapy, Antwerpen, Belgium<br />

7<br />

CHU Liège, Radiotherapy, Liège, Belgium<br />

9<br />

UCLSt Luc, Radiotherapy, Woluwe, Belgium<br />

<br />

: In Belgium (BE) and The Netherlands (NL)<br />

permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPBT) using <strong>12</strong>5 I seeds is a widely<br />

used treatment modality. The strong increase in the number <strong>of</strong><br />

patients treated prompted the NCS board in 2004 to set up a working<br />

group in order to study the clinical and dosimetry aspects related to<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> lowenergy photon (LEP) sources and to publish guidelines<br />

and recommendations on QC with respect to this use.<br />

: The clinical practice regarding QC <strong>of</strong> LEP<br />

sources used in BT was studied by sending a questionnaire to all<br />

institutes in both countries. From this survey a large variability in the<br />

QC procedures applied was observed. In about 40% <strong>of</strong> the institutes<br />

the source strength <strong>of</strong> the LEP sources was not routinely verified.<br />

Table 1 gives an overview <strong>of</strong> the measurement equipment available in<br />

the institutions. Only 3 devices were calibrated at an ADCL, 4 other<br />

were calibrated by the manufacturer.<br />

Table 1: Measurement equipment in use in Be and Nl<br />

Be Nl Total<br />

None 5 1 6<br />

PTW SourceCheck 9 1 <strong>10</strong><br />

SI (HDR<strong>10</strong>00/IVB<strong>10</strong>00) 4 4 8<br />

NA 34070 3 3 6<br />

Capintec (CRC<strong>10</strong>/CRC15R) 2 1 3<br />

Veenstra VDC303 1 1<br />

Sun Nuclear <strong>10</strong>0840 1 1<br />

In a second step, onsite visits were performed in all participating<br />

institutes (31). The source strength for a limited number <strong>of</strong> seeds<br />

(typically 3) was measured by the NCS visit team and compared to the<br />

value stated on the source certificate and, if available, to the value<br />

determined by the local physicist.<br />

During the onsite visits the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the TPS used for PPBT was<br />

evaluated with 5 basic tests. The AAPM TG43 update and consensus<br />

data or otherwise published data on the source dosimetry parameters<br />

were used as reference. The tests revealed variations in dose<br />

calculation results due to incorrect application <strong>of</strong> the anisotropy<br />

model by the user and to the use <strong>of</strong> source data which were since<br />

2004 no longer recommended. Most TPSs underestimate the volumes<br />

in DVH calculations.<br />

These results have been presented earlier (Boston 2008).<br />

: The survey and onsite visits identified a need for guidelines<br />

on the QC <strong>of</strong> LEP BT sources. Taking into account the<br />

recommendations from other <strong>org</strong>anizations such as IAEA, ICRU, IPEM,<br />

ESTRO and AAPM, the subcommittee decided to adopt the latter and<br />

recommends to verify the source strength on a sample <strong>of</strong> sources prior<br />

to the implantation procedure. Dedicated instruments should be used,<br />

and these should be traceably calibrated at a 2 year interval.<br />

The ultrasound (US) machine grid and template alignment should be<br />

verified at a 3 months interval (tolerance 2 mm). The accuracy <strong>of</strong><br />

source position reconstruction by the TPS should be tested for all<br />

imaging modalities that are applied (accuracy < 2 mm). Dose<br />

calculation accuracy should be verified to be < ±2%.<br />

: The NCS subcommittee endorses the recommendations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the AAPM to perform a measurement on a sample <strong>of</strong> sources prior<br />

to the implantation procedure, using dedicated and traceably<br />

calibrated instruments.<br />

The subcommittee stresses the importance <strong>of</strong> using consensus data as<br />

input in the TPS and presents recommendations for the QC <strong>of</strong> this TPS<br />

and <strong>of</strong> the US system that is used for PPBT.<br />

OC67<br />

AAPM PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR COMS EYE PLAQUE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

S.T. ChiuTsao 1 , M.A. Astrahan 2 , P.T. Finger 3 , D.S. Followill 4 , A.S.<br />

Meigooni 5 , F. Mourtada 6 , M.E. Napolitano 7 , R. Nath 8 , M.J. Rivard and<br />

C.S. Melhus 9 , D.W.O. Rogers and R.M. Thomson <strong>10</strong><br />

1<br />

Quality MediPhys LLC, Physics, Denville NJ, USA<br />

2<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Southern California, Radiation Oncology, Los Angeles<br />

CA, USA<br />

3<br />

The New York Eye Cancer Center, Ophthalmology, New York NY, USA<br />

4<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Radiological<br />

Physics Center, Houston TX, USA<br />

5<br />

Comprehensive Cancer Center <strong>of</strong> Nevada, Radiation Oncology, Las<br />

Vegas NV, USA<br />

6<br />

Christiana Health Care System, Radiation Oncology, Newark DE, USA<br />

7<br />

Elekta Inc., Physics, Norcross GA, USA<br />

8<br />

Yale University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Therapeutic Radiology, New<br />

Haven CT, USA<br />

9<br />

Tufts University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Boston MA,<br />

USA<br />

<strong>10</strong><br />

Carleton University, Physics, Ottawa, Canada<br />

: A report has been prepared on quality practice<br />

recommendations for COMS eye plaque brachytherapy which have<br />

been endorsed by the ABS. The forthcoming report includes reference<br />

coordinates for seeds positioned in COMS plaques, fundus diagrams for<br />

eyes, a clinical literature review, and estimates <strong>of</strong> dose changes when<br />

heterogeneity corrections are made to the TG43 dose calculation<br />

formalism. A summary <strong>of</strong> the dosimetry and quality practice aspects is<br />

provided if a decision is made to adopt heterogeneity corrections.<br />

: A literature search was performed to<br />

evaluate dosimetry studies and clinical practices. A 2011 multi<br />

institutional COMS plaque dosimetry study was evaluated as a basis for<br />

practice recommendations and to estimate behavior <strong>of</strong> different<br />

treatment planning techniques with and without heterogeneity<br />

corrections.<br />

: The TG43 formalism does not account for material<br />

heterogeneities. A prescription dose <strong>of</strong> 85 Gy (based on homogeneous<br />

water assumption) at 5 mm depth actually delivers 76 Gy and 67 Gy<br />

for <strong>12</strong>5 I (model 6711) and <strong>10</strong>3 Pd (model 200) sources, respectively, after<br />

accounting for COMSplaque heterogeneities. Factor <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> dose<br />

changes occur between homogeneous and heterogeneous medium<br />

calculations for <strong>of</strong>faxis anatomic structures. The plaque treatment<br />

planning system and ultrasound unit should be commissioned<br />

preceding clinical use. The prescription should include a retinal<br />

diagram that indicates the affected eye, tumor location, tumor<br />

dimensions, and proximity to critical normal ocular structures. Doses<br />

to fovea, optic disc, lens, opposite eye wall, and sclera should be<br />

calculated. Seed strengths shall be verified prior to plaque assembly<br />

and loading patterns confirmed using autoradiography, photography,<br />

or visual inspection. The plaque placement should be verified<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 27<br />

intraoperatively. Intraoperative ultrasonographic imaging, scleral<br />

depression, and/or transillumination techniques are widely used to<br />

verify plaque placement accuracy for posterior tumors. Different dose<br />

calculation algorithms can result in significant dose differences which<br />

can complicate evaluations <strong>of</strong> radiation dose response and<br />

intercomparisons with other modalities.<br />

: Accurate dose calculations are the foundation upon<br />

which meaningful intercomparisons can be performed amongst<br />

different radiation modalities and for variations such as the use or<br />

nonuse <strong>of</strong> Silastic inserts, gold 'seedguides,' seed slots, notches,<br />

plaqueslots, and custom plaque designs. Thus, as more accurate<br />

methods for dose calculation become available, these methods should<br />

be adopted clinically even though it may require changes in<br />

prescription doses. Practice guidelines are also provided outlining<br />

specific tasks towards unifying the widespread practice <strong>of</strong> eye plaque<br />

brachytherapy. A joint AAPM/ABS/ESTRO Task Group has been<br />

established and will examine similar aspects that are specific to non<br />

COMS plaques.<br />

OC68<br />

DOSIMETRIC CHARACTERIZATION OF SURFACE APPLICATORS USED WITH<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY SOURCES<br />

R. Fulkerson 1 , J. Micka 1 , L. DeWerd 1<br />

1<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin School <strong>of</strong> Medicine and Public Health,<br />

Medical Physics, Madison, USA<br />

<br />

: This investigation was performed to develop a<br />

quantitative method <strong>of</strong> output verification for surface applicators<br />

used with HDR brachytherapy sources. Specifically applicators<br />

manufactured by Varian Medical Systems (Palo Alto, CA) for use with<br />

the VariSource TM iX and GammaMedplus iX HDR 192 Ir afterloader<br />

systems, as well as applicators manufactured by X<strong>of</strong>t Inc (an iCAD<br />

company) (Sunnyvale, CA) for use with the Axxent ® source. Current<br />

dosimetry protocols available from the AAPM cannot be applied<br />

directly for these kinds <strong>of</strong> surface applicators. The standard<br />

interstitial brachytherapy dosimetry protocol (TG43) was intended<br />

for treatments assuming full homogenous backscatter, with a<br />

reference point 1 cm from the perpendicular bisector <strong>of</strong> a<br />

cylindrically symmetric source. Another dosimetry protocol <strong>of</strong> interest<br />

(TG61) was developed to determine absorbed dose to water at a<br />

point <strong>of</strong> interest through airkerma rate measurements with a NIST<br />

traceable ionization chamber for lowenergy superficial xray beams.<br />

The geometric and scatter conditions <strong>of</strong> the Varian and X<strong>of</strong>t<br />

applicators do not fully meet the requirements described in either<br />

protocol, and this work aims to provide a transition within the<br />

underlying issue <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy sources being used as external<br />

beam sources.<br />

: Conical surface applicators with diameters<br />

ranging from 1 cm to 5 cm are available for the conformal treatment<br />

<strong>of</strong> superficial lesions. To ensure the correct dose is delivered to the<br />

patient, the output <strong>of</strong> each applicator must be characterized and<br />

calibrated using a NISTtraceable dosimetric standard. Airkerma rate<br />

measurements for each applicator were performed using a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

ionization chambers. To obtain a dose to water from the airkerma<br />

rate measurements, a number <strong>of</strong> correction factors were applied<br />

including Monte Carlo determined backscatter factors (Bw) and<br />

chamber stem correction factors (Pstem). Additional measurements <strong>of</strong><br />

the relative surface dose distributions and depth dose curves in water<br />

were determined for all applicators and compared to the Monte Carlo<br />

calculated values.<br />

: Measured airkerma rates for the Varisource iX are shown in<br />

Table 1, decay corrected to a reference date. Measurements for all<br />

applicators agreed to within 5%. Measured and calculated depth dose<br />

curves for the Varisource iX and GammaMed iX agreed to within 3% for<br />

all applicators. Similar results were observed for the Axxent surface<br />

applicators.<br />

: This work will create a surface applicator specific<br />

dosimetry protocol based on airkerma rate measurements with a<br />

NISTtraceable small volume parallelplate chamber. Through<br />

measured and calculated chamber correction factors and relative dose<br />

distribution information, users will have a clinically relevant<br />

methodology for output verification, minimizing the uncertainty<br />

associated with patient dose delivery.<br />

OC69<br />

BRINGING INVIVO FIBERCOUPLED BRACHYTHERAPY DOSIMETRY TO<br />

THE PATIENT<br />

G. Kertzscher 1 , C.E. Andersen 1 , J.C. Lindegaard 2 , L.U. Fokdal 2 , M.<br />

Paludan 2 , S.K. Nielsen 3 , K. Tanderup 4<br />

1<br />

Technical University <strong>of</strong> Denmark, Center for Nuclear Technologies,<br />

Roskilde, Denmark<br />

2<br />

Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Aarhus,<br />

Denmark<br />

3<br />

Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics, Aarhus,<br />

Denmark<br />

4<br />

Aarhus University, Institute <strong>of</strong> Clinical Medicine, Aarhus, Denmark<br />

: The clinical use <strong>of</strong> invivo brachytherapy (BT)<br />

dosimetry is limited partly by operative complexities and<br />

measurement and detector positioning uncertainties. These<br />

limitations compromise the detection <strong>of</strong> BT treatment errors. Fiber<br />

coupled dosimetry systems have demonstrated capacity for accurate<br />

realtime BT dosimetry. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to develop<br />

tools and methods that increase possibilities to perform routine and<br />

precise fibercoupled BT dosimetry in the clinic.<br />

: Invivo fibercoupled Al2O3:C dosimetry was<br />

performed during four pulsed dose rate (PDR) BT treatments <strong>of</strong> locally<br />

advanced cervical cancer. Each patient underwent 20 hours <strong>of</strong><br />

intracavitary PDR BT using tandemring applicators ± interstitial<br />

needles. Tools developed for improved probe placement stability,<br />

minimal calibration time, and insignificant optical interference were<br />

evaluated. A procedure to light seal the fibercable using black<br />

polyethylene terephthalate heatshrink tubing was developed. The<br />

dosimeter probe was placed inside a catheter which was fastened to<br />

the tandem applicator (see Figure). Reference dose rates were<br />

calculated according to the TG43 protocol using MR reconstructed<br />

dosimeter probe and source dwell positions. Measured dose rate<br />

discrepancies with respect to the first BT pulse were obtained for<br />

each tandem applicator dwell position during the treatments.<br />

Dosimeter position shifts were deduced by minimizing the difference<br />

between measured and numerically simulated dose rate<br />

discrepancies.<br />

: Measured dose rate discrepancies during treatments 1, 3, and<br />

4 corresponded to a 1.5 mm maximum dosimeter position shift with<br />

respect to the position during the initial treatment pulse (see Figure).<br />

As an example, in one treatment pulse, a 2.5 % (1.5 %) dose rate<br />

discrepancy at the 52 mm (13 mm) sourcetodetector distance,<br />

corresponded to a 0.4 mm (0.2 mm) position shift in the longitudinal<br />

dosimeter probe direction. The 4 mm position shifts observed during<br />

the second treatment, were ascribed to a poor probe connection. The<br />

dry calibration procedure took less than 15 min, including the time<br />

required to setup the afterloader, powering the computer, etc. Heat<br />

shrink tubing kept the outer diameter <strong>of</strong> the dosimeter smaller than<br />

1.1 mm, and reduced the light interference by two orders <strong>of</strong><br />

magnitude to the readout electronics background level.


S28 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

: Utilities necessary to facilitate routinebased and time<br />

efficient invivo BT dosimetry is presented. The measured 1.5 mm<br />

probe position stability provides a crucial dose rate uncertainty<br />

component during both PDR and HDR BT dosimetry. The thin and light<br />

tight dosimeter probe allows for both easy probe insertion and sub<br />

mm stability measurements.<br />

OC70<br />

A REVOLUTIONARY MULTIPOINT PLASTIC SCINTILLATION DETECTOR<br />

FOR IN VIVO DOSIMETRY IN HDR BRACHYTHERAPY.<br />

F. TherriaultProulx 1 , L. Archambault 2 , S. Beddar 1 , L. Beaulieu 2<br />

1<br />

UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Physics,<br />

Houston, USA<br />

2<br />

HotelDieu de Quebec, Departement de RadioOncologie, Quebec,<br />

Canada<br />

: There is a growing interest for in vivo dosimeters<br />

in high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR). If plastic scintillation<br />

detectors (PSDs) have been shown to possess advantageous<br />

characteristics, they require a coupling to an optical guide for each<br />

point <strong>of</strong> measurement. In brachytherapy the space for dosimeter<br />

insertion is <strong>of</strong>ten limited (e.g. in catheters). The necessity <strong>of</strong> an<br />

optical guide for each scintillating element then <strong>of</strong>ten limits the<br />

measurement to a single point per region <strong>of</strong> interest. The purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

our study is to develop a PSD capable <strong>of</strong> measuring dose at multiple<br />

points along a same optical transmission line for Ir192 HDR/PDR<br />

brachytherapy and to demonstrate additional potential applications<br />

for such a detector.<br />

: A multipoint PSD composed <strong>of</strong> three<br />

different scintillating elements (2 mm long x 1 mm diameter, 25 mm<br />

apart) and a single collection plastic optical fiber (20 m long x 1 mm<br />

diameter) was built, as depicted in figure 1. Optical spectra (Spec.)<br />

were acquired at the output <strong>of</strong> the collection optical fiber. The<br />

emission spectra from the scintillating elements were obtained using a<br />

well collimated xray source. The light spectrum <strong>of</strong> the stem effect<br />

generated in the clear optical fiber was obtained through irradiation<br />

using the Ir192 HDR brachytherapy source. A novel approach allowed<br />

us to calculate the individual contribution (CX) <strong>of</strong> each lightemitting<br />

component (see equation 1). The dose to a specific scintillating<br />

element can be calculated from equation 2 by using at least one<br />

knowndose condition to this element.<br />

: Dose measurements were performed with the multipoint<br />

detector placed at radial distances (r) <strong>of</strong> 1.0 cm and 2.0 cm from the<br />

source inside a polystyrene phantom and compared to data from the<br />

treatment planning system (TPS). Figure 1 shows the dose integrated<br />

by the detector by each scintillating element for each source positions<br />

along the z axis together with the expected dose as calculated by the<br />

TPS. There is a (4.6±1.0)% average difference between the measured<br />

dose and the dose from the TPS for individual dwell positions. The<br />

summation <strong>of</strong> measurements for all dwell positions differs from the<br />

dose calculated across the entire catheter by only (2.1±1.0)%. On top<br />

<strong>of</strong> their use for simultaneous multipoint dosimetry, we showed that<br />

the scintillating elements were capable <strong>of</strong> determining the source<br />

position along the zaxis with a (0.8±0.2) mm accuracy.<br />

: This study shows for the first time it is possible to<br />

measure accurately dose at multiple positions in HDR brachytherapy<br />

using a waterequivalent detector with a single line <strong>of</strong> signal<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 29<br />

transmission. This will be useful for spatially constrained applications<br />

and will decrease the need for additional catheter implants. Together<br />

with its capacity to determine accurately the source position in space<br />

and all the other advantages known to PSDs, the multipoint PSD has a<br />

bright future and should lead to the development <strong>of</strong> various<br />

applications in HDR/PDR brachytherapy for both in vivo dosimetry and<br />

pretreatment quality assurance.<br />

<br />

OC71<br />

SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS (SNP'S) ASSOCIATED WITH LATE<br />

RADIATION TOXICITY AFTER PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

N. Leong 1 , M. Parliament 1 , K. Martell 2 , S. Ghosh 3 , N. Pervez 1 , J.<br />

Pedersen 1 , D. Yee 1 , A. Murtha 1 , J. Amanie 1 , N. Usmani 1<br />

1 Cross Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, Edmonton, Canada<br />

2 University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Edmonton, Canada<br />

3 University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Oncology, Edmonton, Canada<br />

: Excessive toxicity from prostate brachytherapy<br />

treatment may be related to increased radiosensitivity from genetic<br />

polymorphisms. This study was designed to identify particular single<br />

nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP's) that were associated with high<br />

toxicity after therapy in order to determine possible markers for<br />

increased radiation sensitivity<br />

: 349 patients treated with prostate<br />

brachytherapy at the Cross Cancer Institute between 1998 and 20<strong>10</strong><br />

provided saliva samples from which DNA was extracted for this<br />

research ethics board approved study. In the cohort <strong>of</strong> patients with<br />

at least 2 years <strong>of</strong> followup, 41 patients were identified as having<br />

high late toxicity (≥ RTOG grade 2 GI or GU toxicity), and 1<strong>10</strong> patients<br />

were identified as controls without high late toxicity. We analyzed 15<br />

SNP's from 13 genes (MSH6, GSTA1, SOD2, NOS3, GSTP1, ATM, LIG4,<br />

XRCC1, XRCC3, RAD51, TP53, TGFβ1, ERCC2) for correlation with<br />

increased late toxicity. Patient factors and dosimetric parameters<br />

were also collected for the analysis.<br />

: All 15 proposed SNP's demonstrated polymorphism within the<br />

study population. We implemented a univariate analysis, with<br />

Bonferroni correction, to examine the correlation between variant<br />

allele SNP's (versus wild type) and the presence <strong>of</strong> increased toxicity.<br />

This revealed a statistically significant relationship in 3 <strong>of</strong> the SNP's<br />

(p


S30 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

urethral dose to 0.1 cm 3 , 1 cm 3 , and 2 cm 3 was on average 76.2 Gy<br />

(range: 49.4 – 111.2 Gy), 48.9 Gy (range: 43.2 – 68.1 Gy) and 46.1 Gy<br />

(range: 43.2 – 51.8 Gy) respectively. 2 <strong>of</strong> the 6 patients who had<br />

urethral involvement developed urethral necrosis after HDRBT. The<br />

D90 for these 2 patients was 76.8 Gy (range: 70.7 – 83.0 Gy). The<br />

average urethral dose to 0.1 cm 3 , 1 cm 3 , and 2 cm 3 for these patients<br />

was 95.1, 45.8, and 45.8 Gy respectively. Those that developed<br />

severe urethral toxicity had a trend to higher mean equivalent dose to<br />

the urethra (95.1 Gy vs. 73.4 Gy, p=0.1) and significantly higher dose<br />

per fraction <strong>of</strong> HDRBT to 0.1 cm 3 volume <strong>of</strong> the urethra (5.7 Gy vs.<br />

3.7 Gy, p=0.02) when compared to those who did not develop severe<br />

urethral toxicity.<br />

: This is the first study to assess urethral dosimetry for<br />

patients treated with HDR interstitial brachytherapy. The feasibility <strong>of</strong><br />

contouring the urethra as a critical structure and monitoring its dose<br />

is demonstrated. Patients who received over 5 Gy/fraction to 0.1 cm 3<br />

<strong>of</strong> urethra (approximate equivalent dose <strong>of</strong> 85 Gy) are at significantly<br />

increased risk <strong>of</strong> severe urethral toxicity. Since the total urethral<br />

volume was small, the point dose appears <strong>of</strong> greater clinical<br />

importance. Thus while sometimes high doses are necessary to<br />

adequately treat tumor with urethral involvement, the dose to the<br />

urethra should be monitored and reduced to decrease the likelihood<br />

<strong>of</strong> morbidity.<br />

OC74<br />

DOES PARTIAL BREAST BRACHYTHERAPY DECREASES SCATTERED FETAL<br />

DOSE IN PREGNANT WOMEN?<br />

A. Youssef 1 , T. LaCouture 1 , N. Pahlajani 1 , L. Hughes 1 , Y. Chen 1 , L. An 1 ,<br />

P. Potrebko 1 , N. Kramer 1 , S. Asbell 1<br />

1 Cooper University Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Camden, USA<br />

: More than 4000 pregnant women per year would<br />

need radiation therapy during pregnancy. Many studies had been<br />

made on calculation and measurement <strong>of</strong> the fetal dose from breast<br />

radiotherapy for pregnant women. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is to<br />

investigate if the fetal dose can be lowered using Partial Breast<br />

<strong>Brachytherapy</strong>.<br />

: The scattered dose to the anterior abdominal<br />

wall <strong>of</strong> 4 patients treated with Partial Breast <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> (PBB)<br />

treatments were recorded using film badges placed at anterior<br />

abdominal wall around the umbilicus. PBB used SAVI devices, two<br />

cases used SAVI size (61), one case used SAVI size (81) and one used<br />

SAVI size (<strong>10</strong>1). The dose was measured during 5 out <strong>of</strong> the <strong>10</strong><br />

treatments given. The dose per treatment was 340 cGy to 1 cm<br />

around the lumpectomy cavity. One cm bolus was added on top <strong>of</strong> the<br />

film badges. No shielding was attempted. The scattered dose was also<br />

measured the same way for 2 patients treated with IMRT to the whole<br />

breast. The dose prescribed was 180 cGy per fraction using inverse<br />

and forward IMRT. Again no shielding was attempted. The film badges<br />

were placed at the anterior abdominal wall with one cm bolus on top.<br />

The doses were recorded for only five treatments.<br />

: The measured dose was analyzed and multiplied by 2 for PBB<br />

(to get a total dose <strong>of</strong> 34 Gy), and by 5 for whole breast IMRT (to<br />

calculate for a total dose <strong>of</strong> 45 Gy to the whole breast in 25<br />

fractions). The following table simplifies the results<br />

Treatment<br />

type<br />

Calculated total<br />

treatment dose<br />

Patient height in<br />

inches<br />

Case #1 SAVI (61) 9.754 cGy 61<br />

Case #2 SAVI (61) 3.65 cGy 68<br />

Case #3 SAVI (81) 8.528 cGy 63<br />

Case #4 SAVI (<strong>10</strong>1) 14.878 cGy 60<br />

Case #5 IMRT<br />

forward<br />

28.305 cGy 62<br />

Case #6 IMRT<br />

inverse<br />

20.815 cGy 67<br />

Our data showed that PBB treatment lowered the dose scattered to<br />

the fetus during pregnancy. The average dose for PBB was 9.2 cGy vs.<br />

24.5 cGy for IMRT. The dose <strong>of</strong> PBB was directly related to the size <strong>of</strong><br />

the SAVI and inversely proportional to the distance between the<br />

device and the point <strong>of</strong> measurement on the anterior abdominal wall.<br />

: Although our data does not show that PBB is safe to<br />

treat pregnant women, we believe that PBB contributes with fewer<br />

doses to the fetus during pregnancy and further investigation should<br />

show that PBB can be used safely if special techniques are used to<br />

limit fetal dose.<br />

OC75<br />

CTGUIDED INTERSTITIAL IODINE<strong>12</strong>5 SEED IMPLANTATION IN THE<br />

TREATMENT OF SPINAL AND PARASPINAL MALIGNANCIES<br />

C. Liu 1 , H.S. Yuan 1 , J.J. Wang 2 , N. Meng 2 , Y.Q. Ma 1 , S.B. Han 1 , C.N.<br />

Pang 1<br />

1<br />

Peking University Third Hospital, Radiology, Beijing, China<br />

2<br />

Peking University Third Hospital, Oncology, Beijing, China<br />

<br />

: To investigate the clinical benefits <strong>of</strong> CTguided<br />

interstitial iodine<strong>12</strong>5 seed implantation in the treatment <strong>of</strong><br />

metastatic or primary spinal and paraspinal tumors.<br />

: 38 patients (with 43 lesions) <strong>of</strong> metastatic or<br />

primary spinal and paraspinal tumors, with no surgery or external<br />

beam radiotherapy opportunity, were underwent implantation<br />

procedure. Treatment planning system (TPS) was used to formulate<br />

the seeds distribution and assess radiation dosimetry preoperation and<br />

to obtain quality evaluation postoperation. Needles placement under<br />

CTguidance were performed according to TPS. The mean minimal<br />

peripheral doses <strong>of</strong> implantation was <strong>12</strong>0Gy (ranged from 90140Gy).<br />

The mean number <strong>of</strong> seeds was 79.3 (ranged from <strong>10</strong>224), The mean<br />

specific activity per seed was mCi 0.7 (ranged from 0.500.80 mCi).<br />

Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Ambulatory function score (AFS) was<br />

used to evaluate pain relief and limb function.<br />

<br />

: All patients tolerated the procedures well. No complications<br />

occurred. The mean followup was 15.3 months (ranged from 1 to 96<br />

months). The local control rate was 76.3% (29/38). The mean local<br />

control time and survival time was 14.2 months and 15.3 months. The<br />

1, 2, 3, and 5year local controls were 79.5%, 72.2%, 72.2% and<br />

72.2%, respectively. The 1, 2, 3, and 5year survival rates were<br />

62.4%, 35.8%, 21.5% and 14.3%, respectively. The mean VAS pre and<br />

postoperation was 8.08±2.<strong>12</strong> and 3.96±2.00, respectively (P


S32 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

: The obtained results show that the proposed detector is<br />

suitable for in vivo realtime dosimetry in high dose rate<br />

brachytherapy. Further studies are currently in progress for the<br />

application <strong>of</strong> this dosimeter in urethral dose measurements during<br />

interstitial brachytherapy treatments <strong>of</strong> the prostate.<br />

<br />

<br />

79<br />

PERMANENT PERINEAL IMPLANT (PPI) SALVAGE OF PPI FAILURES: IS<br />

LESS MORE IN HIGHLY SELECTED PATIENTS<br />

M. Roach<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA<br />

Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA,<br />

USA<br />

It has been estimated that 15 to 75% <strong>of</strong> men treated with radiotherapy<br />

(RT) will fail biochemically (Agarwal et al, Cancer 2008; <strong>12</strong>30714).<br />

Specifically given the outcomes <strong>of</strong> series reported by experienced<br />

Practitioners upwards <strong>of</strong> 30% <strong>of</strong> men undergoing permanent perineal<br />

implants (PPI) for prostate cancer fail within <strong>10</strong> years. Thus it is likely<br />

that failure rates are higher in the community where less experienced<br />

physicians. Based on a “back <strong>of</strong> the envelope” calculation I would<br />

estimate that it is likely that well over <strong>10</strong>0,000 men who have<br />

undergone are experiencing a rising PSA after PPI in the USA alone.<br />

Among the men with rising PSAs post PPI some are failing distantly<br />

and some locally. Given the typical selection criteria and the<br />

likelihood <strong>of</strong> poor quality implants in the community performed by<br />

low volume practitioners it seem probable that at least as many <strong>of</strong><br />

these recurrences are local as occurs after a radical prostatectomy<br />

(RP). Since the vast majority <strong>of</strong> men undergoing salvage external<br />

beam radiation (EBRT) after RP respond, it is also likely that a<br />

relatively large number <strong>of</strong> men failing PPIs might benefit from<br />

additional local treatment.<br />

Currently nearly 95% <strong>of</strong> men failing any form <strong>of</strong> RT are managed with<br />

androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (Agarwal et al, Cancer 2008; <strong>12</strong><br />

30714). Unfortunately this is not a curative intervention and it is<br />

associated with a host <strong>of</strong> side effects. Previous series have<br />

documented suboptimal control rates and significant morbidity when<br />

PPI salvage has been attempted (Moman et al. <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 9: 119<br />

25, 20<strong>10</strong>, Nguyen et al. Cancer 1<strong>10</strong>:1485 92, 2007 and Nguyen et al.<br />

<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 8:34552, 2009). However these series tended to treat<br />

the entire gland to near full doses. Of note however, most clinically<br />

significant local recurrences after RT appear to occur at the initial<br />

site <strong>of</strong> the primary tumor (Pucar et al. IJROBP 69: 629, 2007). Thus<br />

subsets <strong>of</strong> patients who are failing locally can be identified who might<br />

be candidates for local therapy.<br />

At UCSF we assessed feasibility <strong>of</strong> MRplanned focal partial prostate<br />

salvage PPI (psPPI).
Our hypothesis going into this intervention was<br />

based on several principles:<br />

If the seeds were not distributed as planned but they were placed into<br />

the prostate then we did not have to worry about cold spots<br />

elsewhere and there was not need to retreat previously treated areas.<br />

Patients who had limited disease to start out with who appeared to<br />

have recurred in sites <strong>of</strong> previous disease where ideally suited for<br />

psPPI.<br />

An otherwise negative multiparametric MRI, supported by a care set<br />

<strong>of</strong> biopsies combined with #2 above set the criteria for the ideal<br />

patient for psPPI.<br />

Most importantly, develop a strategy that maximized the chances that<br />

our treatment would “at least do no harm”. To this end composite<br />

plans combining the previous dose distribution and “salvage plan” had<br />

to be “safe”.<br />

The potential types <strong>of</strong> patients who might be considered for salvage<br />

local therapies are shown diagrammatically in Figure 1. The typical<br />

patients we at UCSF selected for psPPI belong to categories 3 and 4 as<br />

shown in Figure 1 below.<br />

From 20032009, fifteen patients without metastases underwent<br />

MRI/MRS to identify coincident areas <strong>of</strong> recurrence following iPPI<br />

(N=14 I <strong>12</strong>5, 144Gy, N=1 Pd<strong>10</strong>3, <strong>12</strong>5Gy) underdosage in preparation<br />

for possible psPPI (without hormone therapy). For the psPPI planning<br />

the mean D90 CTV (focal recurrent disease) was set at 142Gy resulting<br />

in a whole prostate gland doses <strong>of</strong> 37Gy and a mean V<strong>10</strong>0 rectum <strong>of</strong><br />

0.5% (0.07cc) and urethra dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>% (0.3cc).<br />

Although the followup definition following psPPI for PSA failure was<br />

chosen as the Phoenix Definition (PSAF = nadir + 2.0) or the first<br />

ASTRO definition (ASTROPSAF = three consecutive rises) we expected<br />

substantially lower values to be reflective <strong>of</strong> success. Toxicity was<br />

scored using CTCAE v4.0.<br />

At psPPI the median age was 68, and the median PSA=3.5ng/mL<br />

(range:0.9 5.6 ng/mL). Most patients (71%) had Gleason Score 6 or<br />

less but 39% had Gleason Scores <strong>of</strong> ≥7. Only 40% had abnormal MRI/S<br />

with one (80%) or two (20%) abnormal foci. The median interval<br />

between iPPI and psPPI was 69mos (range 28132).<br />

At median followup <strong>of</strong> 23.3mos (range 888), two patients (13%)<br />

failed biochemically at 26 and 35mos however both underwent a<br />

second psPPI with followup PSA at 11.7 and 26.4 mos <strong>of</strong> 0.6 and<br />

0.7ng/mL, respectively. Counting these two patients as failure the<br />

ASTROPFS at 1, 2 and 3 years was 86.7%, 78.4%, and 62.7% with 5<br />

failures (N=3 with negative TRUSbiopsy). In contrast, the PhoenixPFS<br />

at 1, 2, and 3years were <strong>10</strong>0%, <strong>10</strong>0%, and 71.4%. psPPI PSA<br />

nadir <strong>12</strong> months is associated<br />

with a low risk <strong>of</strong> systemic progression and 92% remain metastasis<br />

free at 5 years.<br />

Surgical technique<br />

Nowadays with most patients undergoing EBRT, perineal low or high<br />

dose brachytherapy the standard retropubic approach is preferred for<br />

salvage RPE. Depending on the type <strong>of</strong> radiation technique there are<br />

different anatomical areas in which the surgical procedure might be<br />

complicated (table 1) and deserves specific experience.<br />

Complications: Rectal injury has been described in 6% to 19% <strong>of</strong><br />

patients in former series whereas it is reported in only 25% <strong>of</strong><br />

patients in modern series.<br />

Anastomotic strictures occur more frequently in 832%<br />

The incidence if urinary stress incontinence is higher than in series <strong>of</strong><br />

primary RPE. Complete continence can be achieved in about 50%,<br />

another 20% to 30% require only 1 pad per day. The radiation<br />

technique used appears to be associated with the frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

incontinence: in the author’s experience a high continence rate <strong>of</strong><br />

90% could be achieved in patients having undergone LDR<br />

brachytherapy.<br />

Cancer control following SRP<br />

The 5year progressionfree rates have improved and the results are<br />

similar to those <strong>of</strong> standard RPE in cases <strong>of</strong> similar pathological<br />

stages. The <strong>10</strong>year cancer specific and overall survival rates are in<br />

the range <strong>of</strong> 70% to 75% and 60% to 66% in contemporary series. In<br />

most contemporary series, <strong>org</strong>anconfined disease, negative surgical<br />

margins and the absence <strong>of</strong> seminal vesicle and/or lymph node<br />

metastases are favourable prognosticators associated with a better<br />

diseasefree survival <strong>of</strong> approximately 7080%.<br />

: With the advantage <strong>of</strong> PSA screening at regular followup<br />

intervalls following RT, most local failures will be detected by an<br />

asymptomatic PSA increase. Patients with PSA levels < <strong>10</strong> ng/ml, no<br />

palpable disease, negative findings on CT and bone scans are most<br />

suitable candidates for SRP. Contemporary series <strong>of</strong> SRP demonstrate<br />

excellent local control, good longterm cancer specific survival rates,<br />

minimal complication rates and a good health related quality <strong>of</strong> life.<br />

SRP represents the therapeutic option if choice in well selected<br />

patients with locally recurrent PCA preventing significant local<br />

complications. Based on our most recent findings on 117 patients SRP<br />

should only be performed at tertiary referral centres with an<br />

extensive experience not only in radical prostatectomy but especially<br />

in salvage surgery.<br />

<br />

OC81<br />

A MULTICENTRE COMPARISON OF INTER AND INTRAFRACTIONAL<br />

ORGAN MOVEMENT IN CERVIX CANCER BT AND ITS DOSIMETRIC IMPACT<br />

N. Nesvacil 1 , K. Tanderup 2 , T. PaulsenHellebust 3 , A. De Leeuw 4 ,<br />

C. Anderson 5 , S. Mohamed 2 , R. Pötter 6 , C. Kirisits 6<br />

1<br />

Medical University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy and<br />

Oncology Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria<br />

2<br />

Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Aarhus,<br />

Denmark<br />

3<br />

Oslo University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics Division <strong>of</strong><br />

Cancer and Surgery, Oslo, Norway<br />

4<br />

University Medical Center Utrecht, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />

Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />

5<br />

Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Clinical Physics Department,<br />

Northwood Middlesex, United Kingdom<br />

6<br />

Medical University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy and<br />

Oncology Comprehensive Cancer Center & Christian Doppler<br />

Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology,<br />

Vienna, Austria<br />

: Inter and intrafractional <strong>org</strong>an motion plays an<br />

important role in multifractional brachytherapy treatment when one<br />

dose plan is used for multiple fractions, or when <strong>org</strong>an movement<br />

happens in between imaging and dose delivery. The dosimetric impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> such motions has been reported previously in singleinstitutional<br />

studies.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to compare the dosimetric impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>org</strong>an<br />

position variations by a retrospective multicentre analysis with<br />

different application techniques and fractionation schemes.<br />

: Data from 5 centers in the GYNGEC ESTRO<br />

Network using intracavitary (tandem/ovoid or tandem/ring)<br />

applicators +/ interstitial needles were collected.<br />

To assess dosimetric effects <strong>of</strong> the motion <strong>of</strong> critical <strong>org</strong>ans (bladder,<br />

rectum, sigmoid) between treatment fractions, multiple image scans<br />

(MRI or CT) were analysed. OAR were contoured on images at the time<br />

<strong>of</strong> BT planning as well as on a subsequent image series acquired prior<br />

to treatment <strong>of</strong> a subsequent HDR or PDR fraction. Dose plans<br />

generated by using the 1 st image series were superimposed onto the<br />

subsequent image sets and DVH parameters were calculated.<br />

DVH data for a total <strong>of</strong> 96 patients was available (323 image/contour<br />

sets, 254 MRI, 69 CT). DVH data for 16 fractions were available for<br />

each patient. The average time between consecutive image<br />

acquisitions varied between centers, from several hours to several<br />

days (mean 73 h, median 22 h, range 5 h – 22 d).<br />

: For each patient, D2cc for bladder, rectum and sigmoid were<br />

calculated based on images and contour sets acquired at different<br />

times during the BT treatment (at time <strong>of</strong> planning (D2cc_1) + at time


S34 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> subsequent imaging (D2cc_2)), using one dose plan for both image<br />

acquisitions. Data on sigmoid was only reported in 3 centers.<br />

In order to compare DVH parameters from treatment plans based on<br />

different fractionations and dose prescription, the relative changes in<br />

D2cc (physical dose) between two subsequent imaging acquisitions,<br />

(D2cc_2D2cc1)/D2cc_1, were computed.<br />

The median, average +/ standard deviation <strong>of</strong> the relative D2cc<br />

variations were 0.2%, 2.3+/21.7 % for bladder, 3.3%, 7.2+/24% for<br />

rectum, and 2.1%, 2.3+/26.1% for sigmoid.<br />

The data showed no statistically significant increase <strong>of</strong> the variation<br />

with increasing time between two image acquisitions, even not for<br />

those cases where the applicators had been removed and reinserted<br />

between two fractions.<br />

: Although in clinical routine sigmoid is observed to be the<br />

most mobile OAR in cervix cancer BT, the dosimetric effect to the<br />

recorded DVH parameters is comparable to the results for rectum and<br />

bladder. Other influencing factors, which were not recorded in these<br />

retrospective data, remain unclear. In particular, contouring<br />

uncertainties may be a significant contributor to the evaluated<br />

uncertainties. Proposals for standardized data collection and/or<br />

prospective study protocols are currently being developed.<br />

OC82<br />

PREPLANNING IMPROVES FEASIBILITY OF INTRACAVITARY/INTERSTITIEL<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY IN CERVICAL CANCER.<br />

L. Fokdal 1 , K. Tanderup 2 , S.B. Hokland 2 , L. Røhl 3 , E.M. Pedersen 3 , S.K.<br />

Nielsen 2 , J.C. Lindegaard 1<br />

1<br />

Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Aarhus,<br />

Denmark<br />

2<br />

Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics, Aarhus,<br />

Denmark<br />

3<br />

Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology, Aarhus,<br />

Denmark<br />

: Combined intracavitary/interstitial (IC/IS)<br />

brachytherapy (BT) techniques are increasingly being used for<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> locally advanced cervical cancer. The aim was to<br />

investigate clinical feasibility and dosimetric gain <strong>of</strong> combined IC/IS<br />

pulsed dose rate BT for locally advanced cervical cancer based on full<br />

3D MRI preplanning with a tandem/ring IC applicator in situ.<br />

: Twentyfour consecutive patients (pts)<br />

included in the EMBRACE study from our institution were analysed. All<br />

pts had large volume cervical cancer and were treated with 2 IC/IS BT<br />

fractions (BT1 and BT2) combined with radiochemotherapy (4550<br />

Gy/2530 fx and weekly cisplatin). Overall treatment time was 7<br />

weeks with BT1 and BT2 delivered in week 6 and 7. A preplanning<br />

procedure with US guided insertion <strong>of</strong> a tandem/ring applicator in<br />

general anaesthesia and MRI was performed in week 5 (BT0).<br />

Optimised preplans were generated <strong>of</strong>f line for both IC and IC/IS<br />

including predefined virtual needle insertion points and implant depth<br />

through the ring as well as free needles. The IC/IS preplan was used<br />

as template for the actual IC/IS implants. MRI was repeated at BT1<br />

and BT2 and the dosimetric gains associated with the IC/IS implants<br />

were investigated and compared to IC BT0. Geometric reproducibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> the virtual needles from preplan to the actual implanted needles,<br />

time consumption, and assessment <strong>of</strong> acute toxicity and early<br />

morbidity (CTC v.3.0) were investigated.<br />

: Time in general anaesthesia for IC/IS implantation at BT1 and<br />

BT2 was 1530 min longer compared to the IC implant at BT0 (p


S36 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

: While overall changes in D2cc for R, B, and S are small,<br />

a clinically relevant increase in R and B was observed in some cases.<br />

The effect is likely due to changes in <strong>org</strong>an filling. An overall decrease<br />

in S D2cc was observed and was likely due to an overall catheter shift<br />

in the caudal direction. Further investigation on a larger patient<br />

sample will be conducted to validate our conclusions and to asses the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> possible cranial catheter shifts on S D2cc.<br />

<br />

OC87<br />

BREASTCONSERVING THERAPY WITH PARTIAL OR WHOLE BREAST RT:<br />

<strong>10</strong>YEAR RESULTS OF THE BUDAPEST RANDOMIZED TRIAL<br />

C. Polgár 1 , T. Major 1 , J. Fodor 1 , Z. Sulyok 2 , Z. TakacsiNagy 1 , G.<br />

Nemeth 1 , M. Kasler 3<br />

1<br />

National Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy,<br />

Budapest, Hungary<br />

2<br />

National Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Department <strong>of</strong> Surgery, Budapest,<br />

Hungary<br />

3<br />

National Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Director General, Budapest, Hungary<br />

: To report the <strong>10</strong>year results <strong>of</strong> a randomized<br />

study comparing the This survival abstract and cosmetic forms results part <strong>of</strong><br />

breastconserving<br />

treatment the with <strong>of</strong>ficial partial conference breast irradiation media (PBI) programme<br />

or conventional whole<br />

breast and irradiation will be (WBI). available on the day <strong>of</strong> presentation.<br />

: Between 1998 and 2004, 258 selected<br />

patients with T1 N01mi, Grade <strong>12</strong>, nonlobular breast cancer<br />

without presence <strong>of</strong> extensive intraductal component and resected<br />

with negative margins were randomized after breastconserving<br />

surgery to receive 50 Gy WBI (n=130) or PBI (n=<strong>12</strong>8). The latter<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> either 7 x 5.2 Gy highdoserate (HDR) multicatheter<br />

brachytherapy (BT; n=88) or 50 Gy electron beam (EB) irradiation<br />

(n=40).<br />

: At a median followup time <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>2.5 months, the <strong>10</strong>year<br />

actuarial rate <strong>of</strong> local recurrence was 5.9% and 5.1% in PBI and WBI<br />

arms, respectively (p=0.77). There was no significant difference in the<br />

<strong>10</strong>year probability <strong>of</strong> overall survival (80% vs. 82%), cancerspecific<br />

survival (94% vs. 92%), and diseasefree survival (85% vs. 84%), either.<br />

The rate <strong>of</strong> excellentgood cosmetic result was 81% in the PBI, and<br />

63% in the control group (p=0.0015).<br />

: PBI delivered by interstitial HDR BT or EB for a selected<br />

group <strong>of</strong> earlystage breast cancer patients produces similar <strong>10</strong>year<br />

results to those achieved with conventional WBI. Significantly better<br />

cosmetic outcome can be achieved with carefully designed HDR<br />

multicatheter implants compared with the outcome after WBI.<br />

OC88<br />

FIRST CLINICAL RESULTS OF THE GECESTRO BREAST WG PHASE III<br />

MULTICENTRIC APBI TRIAL.<br />

V. Strnad 1 , O.J. Ott 1 , G. Hildebrandt 2,3 , R. Pötter 4 , R. Fietkau 1,2 , J.<br />

Lyczek 5,8 , W. Uter 6, , T. Major 7 , M. Lotter 1 , C. Polgar 7<br />

1<br />

University Hospital Erlangen, Radiation Oncology, Erlangen, Germany<br />

2<br />

University Hospitals Rostock, Radiation Oncology, Rostock, Germany<br />

3<br />

University Hospital Leipzig, Radiation Oncology, Leipzig, Germany<br />

4<br />

University Hospital AKH, Radiotherapy and Radiobiology, Vienna,<br />

Austria<br />

5<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Warsaw, Poland<br />

6<br />

Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology,<br />

Erlangen, Germany<br />

7<br />

National Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Radiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary<br />

8<br />

Podkarpacki Regional Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, Brzozów,<br />

Poland<br />

: Several Phase II trials have shown that Accelerated Partial<br />

Breast Irradiation (APBI) leads to similar local control rate with lower<br />

toxicity as whole breast irradiation (WBI) after breast conserving<br />

surgery in a selected subgroup <strong>of</strong> breast cancer patients. The primary<br />

objective <strong>of</strong> this randomized multicentric Phase III trial is to compare<br />

multicatheter brachytherapy (BT) alone to WBI in a lowrisk group <strong>of</strong><br />

invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ and to affirm the<br />

hypothesis that local control rates in each arm are equivalent. The<br />

secondary outcome measures include treatmentrelated toxicities,<br />

cosmesis, quality <strong>of</strong> life (QoL) and survival rates. This study is<br />

registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00402519. The rationale, study<br />

design, patients’ and treatment characteristics, and early toxicities<br />

are reported.<br />

: Between <strong>May</strong> 2004 and July 2009, 1195<br />

eligible patients with nodenegative Stage 0/I/II breast cancer were<br />

prospectively enrolled on the protocol. Patients allocated to the<br />

standard arm received 50 Gy WBI in 1.82.0 Gy fractions followed by a<br />

tumor bed boost <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> Gy in 2 Gy fractions. Patients in the<br />

experimental arm were treated with APBI using multicatheter<br />

interstitial BT up to 32.0 Gy/8 fractions or 30.3 Gy/7 fractions (HDR<br />

BT) or up to 50 Gy/0.600.80 Gy (1 pulse/hour, 24 hours/day; PDR<br />

BT). The side effects <strong>of</strong> therapy were documented according Common<br />

Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events v3 and RTOG/EORTC Late<br />

Radiation Morbidity Scoring Scheme. The cosmetic outcome was<br />

judged by digital photographs, for the assessment <strong>of</strong> QoL, repeated<br />

QoLquestionnaires (EORTC QLQC30 including the Breast cancer<br />

module QLQBR23) were used.<br />

: We report on the prospectively collected data from 1195<br />

patients randomized in the GECESTRO APBI Phase III trial who were<br />

eligible and treated according study protocol (WBI: n = 568 vs. APBI: n<br />

= 624). At the time <strong>of</strong> analysis complete followup documentation <strong>of</strong><br />

early toxicities was available for 98.2% (1170/1192) <strong>of</strong> the patients.<br />

Both WBI and APBI were well tolerated with moderate early toxicities<br />

at the end <strong>of</strong> therapy: acute dermatitis (Grade 1: 49.4% vs. 18.4%,<br />

Grade 2: 35.7% vs. 2.1%, Grade 3: 7.1% vs. 0.2%; p 2 mm in 83% <strong>of</strong><br />

patients. Seventy per cent had T 01 tumors and 85% were ER positive.<br />

Seventyone per cent <strong>of</strong> patients were node negative, with <strong>12</strong>% N1, 3%<br />

N0 (i+), and 1.5% N1mic. According to the ASTRO Consensus Guidelines<br />

for use <strong>of</strong> APBI (2009) none <strong>of</strong> these patients would be classified as<br />

suitable based upon age criteria.<br />

: Median age was 48 years (range 39 – 50). With a median<br />

followup <strong>of</strong> 6.2 years (range 1.6 – 16.9) the 5year actuarial local<br />

recurrence rate (LR) was 3%; no regional recurrences (RR) were<br />

documented. Additionally, no distant metastases were seen. Median<br />

time to LR was 7.0 years. On univariate analysis, there were no<br />

factors significant for LR, this including close/positive margins, ER/PR<br />

status, age, nodal status, tumor size, histology, grade, hormonal<br />

therapy or chemotherapy. The 5year actuarial cause specific,<br />

diseasefree, and overall survivals were <strong>10</strong>0%, 97%, and <strong>10</strong>0%,<br />

respectively.<br />

: This cohort <strong>of</strong> young aged patients who have undergone<br />

APBI has yielded excellent localregional control rates and survival<br />

outcomes comparable to more traditional whole breast irradiated<br />

patients. Continued followup along with accrual <strong>of</strong> additional<br />

patients into such protocols as the NSABP B39/RTOG 0413 (which<br />

continues to enroll young patients) will be needed to assess the long<br />

term efficacy <strong>of</strong> breast cancer patients aged 50 or younger treated<br />

with APBI.<br />

OC91<br />

LONG TERM OUTCOMES AND RECURRENCE PATTERN FOLLOWING<br />

ACCELERATED PARTIAL BREAST IRRADIATION USING MAMMOSITE<br />

A. Ravi 1 , C. Sison 2 , A. Osian 3 , S. Lee 4 , D. Nori 1<br />

1<br />

New York Hospital Queens Weill Cornell Medical College, Radiation<br />

oncology, Flushing NY, USA<br />

2<br />

Feinstein Institute for Medical research North Shore LIJ health<br />

System, Biostatistics, Manhasset, USA<br />

3<br />

New York Hospital Queens, Radiation Oncology, Flushing, USA<br />

4<br />

New York Hospital Queens, Surgery, Flushing, USA<br />

: To evaluate: 1. The incidence <strong>of</strong> locoregional<br />

recurrence in early breast cancer treated by APBI using the<br />

MammoSite device in patients grouped according to ASTRO consensus<br />

panel 'suitable 'and 'cautionary' category.<br />

2. The recurrence pattern in patients with 'triple negative tumor' (TN)<br />

(negative <strong>Estro</strong>gen, Progesterone receptor and Human Epidermal<br />

Growth factor (HER2)) and the association and outcomes <strong>of</strong> African<br />

American, Hispanic ethnicity and ER negative tumor.<br />

: Between June 2003 and December 2009, 83<br />

postmenopausal patients:76 invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), 7 ductal<br />

carcinoma in situ (DCIS), with diagnosis <strong>of</strong> early stage breast cancer<br />

and node negative status met our inclusion criteria for APBI using the<br />

single lumen MammoSite balloon catheter. Following a CT scan based<br />

3D plan a dose <strong>of</strong> 3400cGy was prescribed in <strong>10</strong> fractions at distance<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1 cm from surface <strong>of</strong> balloon delivered twice daily, 6 hours apart<br />

using the high dose rate system. Patients were categorized as 4<br />

groups: ASTRO consensus 'suitable', 'cautionary', TN and TN plus Her2<br />

positive ('High Risk'). Data on treatment outcome with for ipsilateral<br />

breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), tumor bed area failure (TBF),<br />

elsewhere failure in the same breast (EF), ipsilateral axilla failure<br />

(IAF) was analyzed.<br />

: There were 42/83 (51%) patients in the 'suitable' and 41/83<br />

(49%) in the 'cautionary' group. TN was 11% (8/76) and 'High risk' was<br />

24% (18/76) <strong>of</strong> invasive cancer patients. Mean age <strong>of</strong> invasive cancer<br />

patients was 72 years. Median followup for all 83 patients was 61<br />

months; 'cautionary' group= 61 months; triple negative= 59; 'suitable'<br />

group=61 and 'High risk'= 59. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given in 18%<br />

(14/76) and hormones in 85% ER+ IDC patients. The locoregional<br />

control was 98.6%. IBTR that was EF occurred in 2/83 (2.4%) patients;<br />

one from the 'cautionary' group (ER, HER2+) and another from the<br />

'suitable' group (ER+, HER2). IAF was seen in the first patient. There<br />

was a significant association between tumor grade and ethnicity with<br />

grade 3 tumors seen more in Hispanic and black women as compared<br />

to others (31% vs. 8%; p=0.03) in the invasive group.<br />

There was a higher proportion <strong>of</strong> ERnegative tumors seen among<br />

African American and Hispanics compared to other ethnicities (56.25%<br />

vs. 8.33%; p


S38 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

: There was very low occurrence <strong>of</strong> IBTR at a median<br />

follow up <strong>of</strong> 5 years in 'suitable', 'cautionary', TN and 'High risk' group<br />

<strong>of</strong> postmenopausal node negative early breast cancer patients<br />

treated with APBI using the MammoSite balloon device. Long term<br />

outcomes <strong>of</strong> APBI in AA and Hispanic patients with TN tumors should<br />

be further investigated.<br />

OC92<br />

IMPACT OF MARGIN STATUS AFTER APBI: AN ANALYSIS OF THE<br />

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF BREAST SURGEONS MAMMOSITEÆ REGISTRY<br />

TRIAL<br />

J.B. Wilkinson 1 , C. Shah 1 , M. Keisch 2 , P. Beitsch 3 , D. Arthur 4 , M.<br />

Lyden 5 , F.A. Vicini 6<br />

1<br />

Oakland University William Beaumont School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Radiation<br />

Oncology, Royal Oak MI, USA<br />

2<br />

Cancer HealthCare Associates University <strong>of</strong> Miami Hospital,<br />

Radiation Oncology, Miami FL, USA<br />

3<br />

Dallas Surgical Group, Breast Surgery, Dallas TX, USA<br />

4<br />

Virgina Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center, Radiation<br />

Oncology, Richmond VA, USA<br />

5<br />

Biostat International Inc., Statistics, Tampa FL, USA<br />

6<br />

Michigan Healthcare Pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, Radiation Oncology, Pontiac MI,<br />

USA<br />

: At this time, data regarding the impact <strong>of</strong> close<br />

or positive surgical margins on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence<br />

(IBTR) is limited to traditional breastconserving therapy (BCT) using<br />

whole breast irradiation (WBI). This study examines the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

margin status on IBTR for patients who received applicatorbased<br />

accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) as part <strong>of</strong> the American<br />

Society <strong>of</strong> Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) MammoSite ® Breast <strong>Brachytherapy</strong><br />

Registry Trial.<br />

: 1449 cases <strong>of</strong> earlystage breast cancer were<br />

prospectively treated with BCT on the ASBrS MammoSite ® Registry<br />

Trial. The MammoSite ® singlelumen Radiation Therapy System (RTS)<br />

(Bedford, MA) was used to deliver adjuvant APBI to the tissue<br />

surrounding the lumpectomy cavity (34 Gy in 3.4 Gy fractions, BID).<br />

<strong>12</strong>55 cases (87%) had invasive breast cancer (median size = <strong>10</strong>mm) and<br />

194 cases had DCIS (median size = 8mm). Patients were stratified by<br />

margin status into negative (n=1326), close (< 2mm) (n=1<strong>10</strong>), and<br />

positive (n=13) categories with the IBTR rates compared between<br />

groups.<br />

: One hundred and twenty three ASBrS MammoSite ® Registry<br />

cases (8.5%) had close or positive final margins. In general, the two<br />

groups were well balanced except that patients with close/positive<br />

margins had larger median tumor sizes (11.016.5mm vs. <strong>10</strong>.0mm;<br />

p=0.03, p=0.04) and were more likely to be ER negative (13.615.4%<br />

vs. 9.2%, p=0.01, p=0.03). Positivemargin patients were also more<br />

likely to be node positive (15.4% v. 2.5%, p=0.01) as compared to the<br />

marginnegative cohort. With a median follow up <strong>of</strong> 58.6 months, the<br />

sixyear rate <strong>of</strong> IBTR was double for patients with close margins<br />

compared to that <strong>of</strong> marginnegative patients (8.7% v. 4.1%, p=0.<strong>10</strong>)<br />

and over threefold higher in patients with positive margins (14.3% v.<br />

4.1%, p=0.41). When both groups were pooled, a trend towards<br />

increased IBTR was noted for women with close/positive margins<br />

compared with the negativemargin cohort (9.3% v. 4.1%, p=0.07).<br />

Cases <strong>of</strong> pure DCIS with involved margins had statistically higher IBTR<br />

rates vs. those with negative margins (15.717.6% vs. 4.2%, p=0.01).<br />

No differences emerged in other clinical outcomes by margin status<br />

including regional failure, distant metastasis, diseasefree survival,<br />

causespecific survival, or overall survival.<br />

: Good clinical outcomes were seen in patients undergoing<br />

APBI regardless <strong>of</strong> margin status. However, trends for increased rates<br />

<strong>of</strong> IBTR were noted in patients with close or positive margins; similar<br />

to what is observed with WBI. This analysis supports the<br />

recommendation to obtain margins <strong>of</strong> 2mm or greater prior to<br />

adjuvant application <strong>of</strong> APBI. Further prospective studies are required<br />

to validate these results and assist in the definition <strong>of</strong> appropriate<br />

margin status for patients treated with accelerated partial breast<br />

irradiation.<br />

<br />

<br />

93<br />

TG138 REPORT: UNCERTAINTIES IN PHOTON EMITTING<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY SOURCE DOSIMETRY<br />

B. Thomadsen 1 , L. DeWerd 1 , G. Ibbott 2 , A. Meigooni 3 , M. Mitch 4 , M.<br />

Rivard 5 , K. Stump 6 , J. Venselaar 7<br />

1<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin School <strong>of</strong> Medicine and Public Health,<br />

Medical Physics, Madison Wisconsin, USA<br />

2<br />

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Radiation Physics, Houston Texas, USA<br />

3<br />

Comprehensive Cancer Center <strong>of</strong> Nevada, Radiation Oncology, Las<br />

Vegas Nevada, USA<br />

4<br />

National Institute <strong>of</strong> Standards and Technology, Radiation Division,<br />

Gaithersburg Maryland, USA<br />

5<br />

Tufts University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Boston<br />

Massachusetts, USA<br />

6<br />

Costal Radiation Oncology Group Inc, Santa Maria Radiation Oncology<br />

Center, Santa Maria Califronia, USA<br />

7<br />

Instituut Verbeeten, Medical Physics and Engineering, Tilburg, The<br />

Netherlands<br />

The report <strong>of</strong> Task Group (TG) 138 <strong>of</strong> the American Association <strong>of</strong><br />

Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), in collaboration with the Groupe<br />

Européen de Curiethérapie – European Society for Therapeutic<br />

Radiology and Oncology (GECESTRO) [Medical Physics 38: 782801,<br />

2011], studied the uncertainty in dose delivered to a point in an<br />

infinite water phantom from a single, photonemitting brachytherapy<br />

source, following the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the AAPM’s Task Group 43<br />

(TG 43.) The investigation began with the uncertainties associated<br />

with the calibration <strong>of</strong> sources at the national standards laboratory<br />

and followed through the determination <strong>of</strong> the dosimetric parameters<br />

by measurement and Monte Carlo simulations. The uncertainty<br />

analysis considered those parameters classified by the International<br />

Organization for Standardization as Type A, those amenable to<br />

statistical analysis, and Type B, those requiring different sorts <strong>of</strong><br />

assessment. The relative uncertainties in the individual components <strong>of</strong><br />

the dose calculation were combined in quadrature. The analysis<br />

included the effects <strong>of</strong> phantom construction and composition on<br />

measurements, and interaction data on simulations. Each <strong>of</strong> the TG 43<br />

parameters was considered as well as the transfer <strong>of</strong> the calibration<br />

from the primary standards laboratory to secondary labs and to the<br />

user. The final results for the equivalent <strong>of</strong> one standard deviation<br />

(k=1) in percentage uncertainty are given below. The first values are<br />

for lowenergy sources, while those in parentheses are for highenergy<br />

sources.<br />

Source strength (SK) 1.3 (1.5)<br />

Measured dose 3.6 (3.0)<br />

Monte Carlo 1.7 (1.6)<br />

Interpolation 3.8 (2.6)<br />

Total uncertainty (k=1) 4.4 (3.4)<br />

Expanded Uncertainty (k=2) 8.8 (6.8)<br />

94<br />

SYSTEMATIC OVERVIEW AND REPORTING GUIDELINES FOR<br />

UNCERTAINTIES IN CLINICAL BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

C. Kirisits 1 , M.J. Rivard 2 , F.A. Siebert 3<br />

1<br />

on behalf <strong>of</strong> the GECESTRO uncertainties BRAPHYQS subgroup &<br />

Medical University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Dept. <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy Comprehensive<br />

Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria<br />

2<br />

Tufts University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />

Oncology, Boston, USA<br />

3<br />

UK SH Campus Kiel, Clinic <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Kiel, Germany<br />

The essential result <strong>of</strong> any study on uncertainties <strong>of</strong> clinical<br />

brachytherapy is the impact on absorbed dose. However, only a<br />

couple types <strong>of</strong> uncertainties (i.e. source strength and afterloader<br />

timer) are independent <strong>of</strong> clinical disease site and location <strong>of</strong><br />

administered dose. Therefore, it is not possible to perform an overall<br />

generalized quantitative ranking. While for low energy sources or<br />

situations close to the skin the influence <strong>of</strong> medium on dose<br />

calculation is significant, it is <strong>of</strong> minor importance for high energy<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 39<br />

sources in the pelvic region. The level <strong>of</strong> uncertainties due to target,<br />

<strong>org</strong>an, applicator, and/or source movement in relation to the<br />

geometry assumed for treatment planning is highly dependent on<br />

fractionation and the level <strong>of</strong> imageguided adaptive treatment. The<br />

choice <strong>of</strong> the complexity for such techniques could be based on a<br />

cost/benefit analysis, which needs detailed results from uncertainty<br />

studies. Such studies should report the results in a manner that allows<br />

reproduction and further comparison with other studies:<br />

1. Clearly distinguish between variations, uncertainties, and errors.<br />

2. Quantify Type A and Type B uncertainties, and describe the<br />

approach taken.<br />

3. Present data on the analyzed parameter (distance shifts, volume<br />

changes, source or applicator position, etc…), and also their influence<br />

on absorbed dose for clinicallyrelevant dose parameters (e.g. target<br />

parameters such as D90 or OAR doses).<br />

4. This reporting also can include uncertainties for total dose <strong>of</strong> the<br />

entire treatment course (including several fractions and external<br />

beam dose if applicable) and in terms <strong>of</strong> biological weighted dose as<br />

EQD2.<br />

These comprehensive investigations are important to obtain a general<br />

impression on uncertainties and may help to assess which elements in<br />

the brachytherapy treatment chain need improvement towards<br />

diminishing their dosimetric uncertainties.<br />

95<br />

UNCERTAINTIES IN IMAGE GUIDED BRACHYTHERAPY: ECONOMICAL AND<br />

LOGISTICAL ASPECTS<br />

J.A. Polo Rubio<br />

Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain<br />

Abstract not received<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

96<br />

IS HIGH SAFETY IN BRACHYTHERAPY A RESULT OF ADVANCED<br />

TECHNIQUES AND ADVANCED IMAGING?<br />

D. Baltas<br />

Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach am Main, Germany<br />

Abstract not received<br />

97<br />

STRATEGIES TO PREVENT ERRORS IN BRACHYTHERAPY: LEARNING<br />

FROM OUR MISTAKES<br />

R. Lee 1<br />

1<br />

Duke University Medical Center, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Durham NC, USA<br />

PrecisThis brief session will describe the nature <strong>of</strong> reported errors in<br />

brachytherapy and discuss strategies to prevent errors.<br />

When establishing methods for preventing errors, information on what<br />

errors have occurred in the past proves valuable in directing attention<br />

to aspects <strong>of</strong> a procedure posing the greatest risk. The lecture will<br />

begin with examples <strong>of</strong> reports in the lay press about brachytherapy<br />

errors. The lecture will continue with a description <strong>of</strong> multiple<br />

publications that describe examples <strong>of</strong> errors in brachytherapy<br />

reported to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)<br />

and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The specifics<br />

from the <strong>events</strong> at Philadelphia VA will be reviewed as well. The<br />

lecture will finish with practical recommendations that may prevent<br />

brachytherapy errors in the future.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

98<br />

ROBOT ASSISTED MESH BRACHYTHERAPY AFTER SUBLOBAR RESECTION<br />

FOR EARLY STAGE LUNG CANCER<br />

D. Khuntia 1 , G.H. Dunnington 2 , C. Platta 3 , R.R. Patel 1<br />

1<br />

Western Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Mountain View,<br />

USA<br />

2<br />

Stanford University, Thoracic Surgery, Palo Alto, USA<br />

3<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin, Human Oncology, Madison, USA<br />

Lobectomy has long been the standard <strong>of</strong> care for the management <strong>of</strong><br />

patients with early stage lung cancer. More recently, this has been<br />

challenged as advanced radiotherapy techniques are showing<br />

excellent long term local control approaching that <strong>of</strong> lobectomy.<br />

However, the latter makes assumptions about nodal disease and<br />

occasionally histology, that can dramatically affect the impact on<br />

adjuvant therapy. Recently, there has been resurgence in the United<br />

States <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> sublobar resections for patients that are not able<br />

to tolerate a lobectomy. However, sublobar resection does result in a<br />

a staple line that has a non – trivial risk <strong>of</strong> local recurrence. Methods,<br />

such as mesh brachytherapy have been explored and have shown in<br />

single institution series the ability to dramatically decrease the local<br />

recurrences. Prospective trials are underway to further quantify this<br />

benefit. One <strong>of</strong> the downsides <strong>of</strong> using mesh brachytherapy is that<br />

there is radiation exposure to the team handling the mesh. Novel<br />

methods, utilizing robotic technology, have allowed us to improve the<br />

safety and precision <strong>of</strong> this procedure. In this lecture we will describe<br />

both the rationale and methods for robot assisted mesh brachytherapy<br />

after sublobar resection.<br />

99<br />

RIGID RECTOSCOPY TO IMPROVE RADIATION TARGETING AND<br />

INDIVIDUALISE MANAGEMENT OF RECTAL CANCER<br />

J.P. Gérard 1<br />

1 Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Radiation Oncology, Nice, France<br />

: In rectal cancer most <strong>of</strong> the time radiotherapy (RT) is given<br />

front line and the identification <strong>of</strong> the GTV is important to target<br />

properly the beams. Assessment <strong>of</strong> the GTV (and CTV) can be made<br />

with imaging(CT scan, MRI, ERUS, PetCT etc…) . Clinical examination<br />

with Digital examination (DE) and endoscopy is essential for GTV<br />

evaluation. Endoscopy can be performed in different way (flexible<br />

colo or sigmoidoscopy). Rigid rectoscopy (RR) is a relevant alternative<br />

: RR is performed on an ambulatory basis, in the knee chest<br />

position. A small bowel preparation is necessary. A disposable plastic<br />

rectoscope is used with cold light, insuflation and succion. The<br />

diameter <strong>of</strong> the RR is 2.5 cm. Biopsy can be taken with forceps.<br />

Fiducial marker can be implanted to localize the tumor. Pictures <strong>of</strong><br />

the tumor can be taken with a camera. This examination is lasting 2<br />

to 5 minutes and can be easily repeated at each visit.<br />

:<br />

1 With RR it is possible to see the tumor and localize it precisely in<br />

the rectum which is important for proper delineation on the planning<br />

CT scan. The tumor response is evaluated according to RECIST<br />

criteria. RR can be performed each week during RT and after<br />

treatment to evaluate the CLINICAL RESPONSE (CR) which as strong<br />

predictive and prognostic value (1). A complete CR after neoadjuvant<br />

treatment is defined as no visible tumor and a rectal wall supple or<br />

with a slight non suspicious induration.<br />

If a CCR is achieved the surgeon may reapraize his initial decision and<br />

move to a more conservative type <strong>of</strong> surgery (1).<br />

2 To perform contact XRay (CXRT) it is mandatory to use RR which is<br />

necessary to position the XRay tube in contact to the tumor under<br />

vision control. The diameter <strong>of</strong> this applicator is usually 3 cm ; with<br />

the Papillon 50 TM it is possible to use applicators <strong>of</strong> 2.5 or 2.2 cm easy<br />

to introduce.<br />

The merit <strong>of</strong> CXRT is to safely increase (50 to 1<strong>10</strong> Gy in 3 to 4<br />

fractions) the dose to the rectal tumor. The randomized trial Lyon<br />

R9602 has shown that CXRT+EBRT was increasing significantly the<br />

CCR (29%) and the rate <strong>of</strong> colostomy free <strong>10</strong> year survival (60%) (2).


S40 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

CXRT alone or combined with external beam RT can definitively<br />

control 80 to 90% <strong>of</strong> T1 or T2 N0 tumors not exceeding 4 cm in<br />

diameter (3).<br />

: Clinical examination <strong>of</strong> the tumor with RR is an essential<br />

step <strong>of</strong> the management <strong>of</strong> rectal cancer with radiotherapy. It is<br />

simple and fast to perform but need some clinical practice. Radiation<br />

oncologists treating rectal cancers (and all surgeons) should become<br />

familiar with RR and use it on a routine basis.<br />

References:<br />

Ortholan C et al. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:302<strong>10</strong>.<br />

Gérard JP et al. IJRBOP 2011 ;81(2) : abstract 191<br />

Gérard JP et al. Lancet Oncol 2003 ;4(3) :15866.<br />

<strong>10</strong>0<br />

RADIOLOGICAL INTERVENTION<br />

G. Gademann 1 , J. Ricke 2<br />

1<br />

OttovonGuerickeUniversität, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy,<br />

Magdeburg, Germany<br />

2<br />

OttovonGuerickeUniversität, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology and Nuclear<br />

Medicine, Magdeburg, Germany<br />

: The new possibilities <strong>of</strong> image guidance by<br />

interventional radiology enable very advanced treatments by<br />

interstitial brachytherapy. Tumors or metastases at almost any<br />

anatomical site may be targeted. In this talk, the spectrum <strong>of</strong><br />

indications will be demonstrated. Clinical and oncological properties<br />

and results will be discussed accordingly.<br />

: Positioning <strong>of</strong> the catheters is carried out by CT<br />

or MRI guidance. The Seldinger technique is applied to place sheaths<br />

in the target volume, which ultimately host the brachytherapy<br />

catheter. Proper localization and a sufficient number <strong>of</strong> catheters are<br />

important to achieve an adjusted dose distribution. In specific cases<br />

this is supported by preplanning using virtual catheters in the<br />

treatment planning system set by a radiooncologist. HDR<br />

brachytherapy with a 192Ir source is dependent on a close inter<br />

disciplinary cooperation <strong>of</strong> radiooncologist and radiointerventionalist.<br />

Since August 2006 1573 patients with liver tumors have been treated,<br />

as well as 163 patients with lung tumors and metastases, 44<br />

retroperitoneal malignancies, 15 renal tumors and 1<strong>10</strong> patients with<br />

tumors in other locations.<br />

: Prospective data is available on HCC as well as colorectal<br />

carcinoma. Outside the liver, prospective data is available on lung and<br />

retroperitoneal treatments. A prospective phase II trial with 83<br />

brachytherapy application for lung malignomas resulted in a local<br />

control rate <strong>of</strong> 92% after <strong>12</strong> months (1 – 21). Minor pneumothorax<br />

occurred in 6 patients (21 %), only in 1 patient a chest tube was<br />

necessary (2 %). There were no changes in the postinterventional vital<br />

capacity.<br />

For the patients with retroperitoneal tumors the results regarding<br />

local control are similar, the complication rate and GI toxicity are<br />

negligible.<br />

: Interventional CT/MRI assisted brachytherapy is typically<br />

an interdisciplinary approach. In almost every anatomical site where<br />

the interventional radiologist may place a catheter brachytherapy is<br />

able to deliveran adequate dose usually as a single fraction. Our<br />

results demonstrate CT guided brachytherapy is safe and highly<br />

effective. It is important to further define appropriate indications<br />

with regard to a) alternative therapeutic approaches such as<br />

extracerebral stereotactical irradiation with hyp<strong>of</strong>ractionation<br />

schemes and b) general oncological considerations. The lecture will<br />

provide facts for this discussion.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<strong>10</strong>1<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY: THE IAEA VISION AND POLICY.<br />

E. Fidarova 1 , E.H. Zubizarreta 1 , J. Wondergem 1 , I. Stojkovski 1 , E.<br />

Rosenblatt 1<br />

IAEA, Applied Radiation Biology and Radiotherapy Section, Vienna,<br />

Austria<br />

In the field <strong>of</strong> Human Health and radiotherapy in particular, the<br />

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has an objective to<br />

enhance Member States’ (MS) capabilities to establish sound policies<br />

for radiotherapy and cancer treatment, to improve access to<br />

radiotherapy worldwide and to ensure the effective and safe<br />

application <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy technologies.<br />

<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> (BT) is an essential component <strong>of</strong> cancer treatment<br />

and activities in this field have always been among IAEA’s priorities.<br />

The IAEA has a number <strong>of</strong> possibilities to address the needs <strong>of</strong> MS<br />

related to BT. Technical Cooperation (TC) Programme comprises<br />

national and regional projects, with either bilateral cooperation<br />

between individual MS or between a group <strong>of</strong> MS in the region and<br />

IAEA. These projects are unique vehicles through which a MS may<br />

obtain knowledge, skills or technology from the Agency or other MS.<br />

Typical examples <strong>of</strong> TC projects are the initiation <strong>of</strong> a highdose rate<br />

(HDR) BT unit, upgrade <strong>of</strong> BT department or introduction <strong>of</strong> a new BT<br />

technique.<br />

The IAEA conducts radiotherapy and radiobiology multicentre<br />

international trials under Coordinated Research Project (CRP)<br />

Programme. They are designed to answer scientific questions relevant<br />

to the radiation oncology community and applicable in busy<br />

radiotherapy departments within limited resource setting. Additional<br />

benefit for participating institutions includes research capacity<br />

building and gaining expertise in conducting radiotherapy trials. Two<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong> currently running CRPs are randomised studies on oesophageal<br />

and cervical cancer investigating clinical outcome and toxicity <strong>of</strong> a<br />

resourcesparing schedule <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy with BT component. The<br />

results <strong>of</strong> CRPs are usually published as IAEA documents with free<br />

access and/or in scientific peerreviewed journals.<br />

The IAEA places a lot <strong>of</strong> emphasis on training and education both in BT<br />

and in external beam radiotherapy. This is achieved through<br />

producing learning and educational materials, making them available<br />

in IAEA <strong>of</strong>ficial languages, <strong>org</strong>anizing and conducting training courses<br />

and workshops, assistance in planning and implementation <strong>of</strong> long<br />

term training and education programmes at the national or regional<br />

level. Recent publications include a full series <strong>of</strong> syllabi for the<br />

training and education <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy pr<strong>of</strong>essionals. The IAEA<br />

develops clinical guidelines for management <strong>of</strong> selected types <strong>of</strong><br />

cancer or clinical situations that are very common in low and middle<br />

income MS. Described approach and techniques are intended to be<br />

simple, feasible and resource sparing to the extent that is possible<br />

when dealing with a complex treatment modality. Such clinical<br />

guidelines on cervical and prostate cancers are in press and will be<br />

available later this year. Another important publication<br />

“Implementation <strong>of</strong> HDR BT in limited resource setting” is planned to<br />

be published in 20<strong>12</strong>/2013. The document covers a broad range <strong>of</strong><br />

relevant subjects, as necessary infrastructure, requirements for<br />

personnel and training, quality assurance, radiation safety and current<br />

applications <strong>of</strong> HDR BT.<br />

The Division <strong>of</strong> Human Health supports and promotes elearning and<br />

mlearning. The recently launched Human Health Campuswebpage<br />

and its mobile version are educational and informational portals for<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionals in radiation medicine. Development <strong>of</strong> learning<br />

resources was performed in close collaboration with pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

educationalists. Among available educational tools are recorded<br />

lectures, interactive case studies and videos containing guide<br />

questions and answers.<br />

It is worth emphasizing that Agency’s policy in reference to<br />

brachytherapy promotes resourcesparing approaches with support <strong>of</strong><br />

HDR brachytherapy, Co 60 brachytherapy, short fractionation schedules,<br />

and the use <strong>of</strong> fixedgeometry applicators (e.g. tandemring).<br />

Having more than half a century history <strong>of</strong> promoting and supporting<br />

<strong>of</strong> radiotherapy and BT in treatment <strong>of</strong> cancer, the IAEA is proud <strong>of</strong> its<br />

success stories. One <strong>of</strong> the recent examples is establishing a HDR BT<br />

unit in ElSalvador.<br />

<strong>10</strong>2<br />

UICC: RADIATION THERAPY IN THE WORLD<br />

M. Gospodarowicz 1<br />

1<br />

Princess Margaret Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Toronto,<br />

Canada<br />

Radiotherapy is a critical ingredient <strong>of</strong> comprehensive cancer<br />

treatment. It has been estimated that anywhere from 40 to 50<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 41<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> all cancer patients would benefit from receiving<br />

radiotherapy in course <strong>of</strong> their illness. Radiotherapy can be used as a<br />

sole curative therapy, in combination with surgery and/ or<br />

chemotherapy as part <strong>of</strong> the initial curative treatment approach, in<br />

the management <strong>of</strong> recurrent disease, and as a powerful tool for<br />

palliation.<br />

Currently, the supply <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy services falls short <strong>of</strong> demand in<br />

many parts <strong>of</strong> the world including many <strong>of</strong> high income countries.<br />

However, the shortage is so pronounced in low and middle income<br />

countries that it precludes radiotherapy from being considered as part<br />

<strong>of</strong> cancer management. In fact, there are many countries in Africa<br />

with no access or access limited to one or two centres. It is estimated<br />

that in Africa, only 18% <strong>of</strong> the published need <strong>of</strong> the minimal need <strong>of</strong><br />

one treatment unit per million population in Africa. In Indonesia,<br />

available radiotherapy resources represent less than <strong>10</strong>% <strong>of</strong> national<br />

need. This in spite <strong>of</strong> a large number <strong>of</strong> cervical cancer cases best<br />

managed with curative radiotherapy. Large gaps also exist in high<br />

income countries that face not only shortages <strong>of</strong> equipment, staff, but<br />

also limited access to new technologies. Radiotherapy is one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

most cost effective and safe cancer treatments available today. To<br />

execute treatment process safely and effectively, an initial<br />

investment into facility, equipment, staff training and ongoing<br />

investment in quality programs is required.<br />

The IAEA has developed a number if guidelines for safe deployment <strong>of</strong><br />

radiation therapy programs. The IAEA has also developed a<br />

Programme for Action for Cancer Therapy (PACT) whose mission is to<br />

contribute to the improvement in cancer survival in developing<br />

countries by integrating radiotherapy investment into health system.<br />

PACT integrates radiotherapy within a comprehensive cancer strategy<br />

within the framework <strong>of</strong> a National Cancer Control Plan. However, in<br />

spite <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> partner <strong>org</strong>anizations, the resources available to<br />

IAEA and PACT Programme are limited. If we are going to witness<br />

improvement in access to radiotherapy in the world, we must change<br />

the current strategy <strong>of</strong> reliance on WHO and IAEA to solve the<br />

problem. The UICC is working together with WHO, IAEA, and its<br />

member <strong>org</strong>anizations to put cancer on the global agenda to secure<br />

improved funding. However, cancer requires complex interventions<br />

and there will be numerous priorities for the use <strong>of</strong> funds.<br />

The national and international radiation therapy <strong>org</strong>anizations should<br />

consider their role in global advocacy for cancer control, especially in<br />

advocacy for radiation therapy. More complete data are required<br />

describing radiotherapy resources including required manpower and<br />

technology for optimal deployment <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy. Many countries<br />

do not recognize medical physicists and radiation therapists as<br />

essential medical personnel. Information regarding infrastructure<br />

required for equipment operation (power supply, service, availability<br />

<strong>of</strong> parts, etc) is frequently incomplete. Resource rich countries should<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer training and assistance to those less resources not only in<br />

providing personnel and medical training but also advocacy and<br />

implementation science support. This help should not be limited to<br />

northsouth help or westeast but also east east and southsouth<br />

help. In addition, the radiotherapy industry should join forces with<br />

other partners to develop affordable sources <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy<br />

equipment coupled with sustainable service provision.<br />

Global radiation oncology community must join forces to assist the<br />

governments in making rational choices in identifying best strategies<br />

to improves cancer control; strategies that include radiotherapy.<br />

<br />

<br />

<strong>10</strong>3<br />

WHAT ARE THE BEST INDICATIONS FOR BRACHYTHERAPY IN NON<br />

MELANOMA SKIN CANCERS?<br />

M. Delannes 1<br />

1 Institut Claudius Regaud, Radiation Oncology, Toulouse, France<br />

Non melanoma skin cancers are highly curable tumors mostly located<br />

in sun exposed areas, with an increased incidence in elderly. The goal<br />

<strong>of</strong> the treatment is to obtain cure with the best achievable cosmetic<br />

and functional results. Different modalities have been applied:<br />

dermatologic treatments, surgery alone or in combination with<br />

external beam radiotherapy, or interstitial low dose rate (LDR)<br />

brachytherapy. More recently, high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy<br />

have been proposed with specific, customized or not, surface<br />

applicators.<br />

Surgery remains the treatment <strong>of</strong> choice if it can be used simply and<br />

safely, when negative microscopic margins can be achieved without<br />

compromising cosmesis or function.<br />

External beam irradiation with electrons can be indicated in locally<br />

advanced lesions (size or thickness), not accessible to other treatment<br />

modalities.<br />

In the other situations, brachytherapy is an excellent option. The<br />

greater experience have been gained with LDR interstitial<br />

treatments, specially for periorificial lesions. The flexibility and<br />

thinness <strong>of</strong> the Iridium wires, the adaptation <strong>of</strong> their longer to the<br />

lesions <strong>of</strong>fer personalized treatments easy to perform with minimally<br />

traumatic implants. The limitation <strong>of</strong> this approach is that patient<br />

isolation is required for several days.<br />

HDR could be used as interstitial as well, but necessitates to use<br />

thicker catheters to allow the passage <strong>of</strong> the HDR Ir source, limiting<br />

its use in fragile areas, such as eyelid. Surface applicators can<br />

overcome this problem, but seem to be more suitable for flat<br />

surfaces, and have some technical limitations, particularly in case <strong>of</strong><br />

thick lesions or necessity <strong>of</strong> placement <strong>of</strong> bent catheters. This<br />

technique can be particularly convenient for the elderly patients,<br />

allowing outpatient treatments.<br />

The acute tolerance <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy is excellent, with grade1 to 2<br />

skin toxicity resolving in 4 to 6 weeks with topical treatments.<br />

Cosmetic and functional results are reported as excellent, with local<br />

control rate comparable to surgery or external beam radiotherapy.<br />

During the lecture, brachytherapy indications will be illustrated with<br />

clinical examples.<br />

<strong>10</strong>4<br />

PHYSICS REQUIREMENTS FOR SKIN BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

J. PerezCalatayud 1<br />

1 Hospital Universitario La Fe, Radiotherapy, Valencia, Spain<br />

Skin or superficial brachytherapy is the modality in which the sources<br />

are set outside, or in contact with, the patient skin. In this<br />

presentation we will focus on the widely extended HDR superficial<br />

brachytherapy. There are two main techniques available:<br />

The first one consists on a simple plane implant using parallel<br />

catheters typically spaced 1 cm following the skin surface. This<br />

configuration is preserved using moulds or flaps, i.e., Freiburg Flap,<br />

depending on the skin curvature. Flaps are designed to keep the<br />

distance between catheters. Typically, the prescription depth is 5<br />

mm. The second technique uses specific applicators, i.e., Leipzig or<br />

Valencia, where the typical prescription depth is 3 mm.<br />

Several physics aspects should be considered in this modality for<br />

treatment planning calculation and will be discussed on this<br />

presentation.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the available TPS perform calculations based on the TG43<br />

method assuming full scatter conditions. In the mould/flap cases,<br />

there is significant lack <strong>of</strong> scatter that could influence the uncertainty<br />

on the dose rate distribution and prescribed dose. In this presentation<br />

deviations between TG43 derived dose distributions and realistic ones<br />

obtained using Monte Carlo methods are evaluated for different<br />

source disposition (involved area), distance to skin (in contact to<br />

several mm), prescription depth (typically 5 mm), use <strong>of</strong> backscatter<br />

tissue equivalence material (typically up to 2 cm), and HDR<br />

radionuclide (Ir192, Co60 and Yb169).<br />

Dose distribution for treatment planning with Leipzig or Valencia<br />

applicators cannot be obtained with the conventional calculation TG<br />

43 approach existing on most <strong>of</strong> the current TPS. Monte Carlo<br />

obtained data are used as will be included in this presentation.<br />

Alternative techniques as the Tufts Technique (Rivard 2009) and<br />

modern algorithms will be discussed.<br />

In clinical practice, special attention should be focused on shielding<br />

and leakage for these applicators. We will illustrate this issue on this<br />

presentation. Similarly, depth evaluation methodology using specific<br />

ultrasound techniques will be addressed.<br />

Commissioning <strong>of</strong> these applicators will be discussed, including<br />

acceptance, source positioning, flatness/symmetry, output, % depth<br />

dose, etc. Finally, it will be complemented with patient specific<br />

aspects as setup <strong>of</strong> the applicators and quality assurance.


S42 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>5<br />

SKIN BRACHYTHERAPY FROM THE DERMATOLOGIST SIDE<br />

J. Strasswimmer<br />

Mohs Surgery Institute <strong>of</strong> Excellence <strong>of</strong> the Dermatology Associates,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Dermatology, Delray Beach, USA<br />

Abstract not received<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<strong>10</strong>6<br />

GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE ON GYNECOLOGIC BRACHYTHERAPY:<br />

CHALLENGES AND DEVELOPMENTS<br />

A. Viswanathan 1<br />

1<br />

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Boston, USA<br />

The management <strong>of</strong> locally advanced cervical cancer has undergone<br />

several fundamental shifts over the past 20 years. With the advent <strong>of</strong><br />

threedimensional (3D) imaging, the implementation <strong>of</strong> CT and MRI in<br />

treatment planning for external beam and brachytherapy has resulted<br />

in many improvements in patient outcomes. In this talk, an overview<br />

<strong>of</strong> the state <strong>of</strong> the art technologies related to imaging for cervical<br />

cancer will be summarized and novel technologies reviewed. In<br />

particular, the role <strong>of</strong> imageguided brachytherapy worldwide and its<br />

implications for patient care will be assessed.<br />

<strong>10</strong>7<br />

MULTICENTER STUDIES WITH IMAGE GUIDED BRACHYTHERAPY IN<br />

CERVICAL CANCER<br />

J.C. Lindegaard 1 , C. CharraBrunaud 2 , A. Sturza 3 , C. HaieMeder 4 , C.<br />

Kirisits 3 , K. Tanderup 5 , R. Pötter 3<br />

1<br />

Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Aarhus C,<br />

Denmark<br />

2<br />

Centre AlexisVautrin, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Vandoeuvreles<br />

Nancy, France<br />

3<br />

Medical University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Vienna,<br />

Austria<br />

4<br />

Service de Curiethérapie, Institut GustaveRoussy, Paris, France<br />

5<br />

Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus University, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Radiotherapy Institute <strong>of</strong> Clinical Medicine, Aarhus, Denmark<br />

The GEC ESTRO guidelines for image guided adaptive brachytherapy<br />

(IGABT) in cervical cancer incorporate the use <strong>of</strong> 3D imaging with<br />

applicator in situ and a 4D target concept (volume & time) including<br />

both tumour extent at diagnosis (Intermediate Risk Clinical Target<br />

Volume [IR CTV] and at time <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy (High Risk Clinical<br />

Target Volume [HR CTV]). Several monoinstitutional reports show<br />

significant improved DVH parameters and clinical outcome compared<br />

to historical standard 2D intracavitary BT but higher level clinical<br />

evidence has so far not been published.<br />

Current multicentre studies encompass a completed French non<br />

randomised study comparing 2D and 3D BT (STIC), an ongoing<br />

international prospective observational study (Embrace) and a parallel<br />

retrospective study (retroEmbrace). In STIC planned surgery was used<br />

in 407 patients (group 1 and 2) leaving 235 patients treated with<br />

definitive radio(chemo)therapy (group 3) and 117 <strong>of</strong> these were<br />

treated with 3D IGABT. STIC was open for accrual 20052007. Since<br />

2008 Embrace has recruited about 600 patients and a similar number<br />

<strong>of</strong> patients treated before 2008 have been registered in the<br />

retroEmbrace. The primary endpoint is local control and morbidity is<br />

assessed with CTCAE v3.0 in all 3 studies. Health related quality <strong>of</strong><br />

life is in addition used in Embrace (EORTC C30+CX24). Currently the<br />

FIGO stage distribution in STIC group 3, Embrace and retroEmbrace is<br />

similar with 9<strong>10</strong>% in stage IB1, 6669% in stage IB2IIAIIB and 2425%<br />

in stage IIIIV. Median dose <strong>of</strong> EBRT is also identical (45 Gy/25 fx) in<br />

all 3 studies, but more patients are receiving concomitant<br />

chemotherapy in Embrace (91%) compared to STIC (77%) and<br />

retroEmbrace (83%). In STIC the imaging modality used for 3D planning<br />

<strong>of</strong> BT is mainly CT (82%), IR CTV is used in all patients for BT dose<br />

prescription and 3D BT is delivered with PDR via pure intracavitary<br />

(IC) implants. MRI is the main imaging modality in retroEmbrace (86%)<br />

and Embrace (<strong>10</strong>0%) and in both studies HR CTV is used in 85% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

patients for BT dose prescription. Dose rate is at the moment 34% HDR<br />

versus 66% PDR in retroEmbrace and 47% HDR versus 53% PDR in<br />

Embrace. In retroEmbrace combined intracavitary/interstitial (IC/IS)<br />

implants is used in 14% <strong>of</strong> the patients increasing to 19% in Embrace.<br />

Reporting <strong>of</strong> dose volume parameters follow the GEC ESTRO guidelines<br />

in all 3 multicentre studies by calculating the equivalent dose in 2 Gy<br />

fractions (EQD2) using a/b=<strong>10</strong> for tumour, a/b=3 for OAR and a repair<br />

halftime <strong>of</strong> 1.5 h (Table 1). The dose received by 90% (D90) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

target (HR CTV and IR CTV) is systematically being reported and for<br />

OAR the minimal dose to the most exposed 2 cm 3 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>org</strong>an (D2cc)<br />

is calculated. The mean volume <strong>of</strong> HR CTV is stable across the 3<br />

studies (3536 cm 3 ). In contrast, there are remarkable differences in<br />

the D90 values between STIC and the Embrace studies reflecting both<br />

different planning aims in terms <strong>of</strong> cumulative EQD2 and the<br />

difference in target volume used for dose prescription (IR CTV versus<br />

HR CTV). The increasing use <strong>of</strong> combined IS/IC implants in<br />

retroEmbrace and Embrace may also contribute to this difference and<br />

may also explain that only a modest increase <strong>of</strong> 27 Gy in the D2cc<br />

values are observed even with a 1115 Gy increase in D90 <strong>of</strong> HR CTV<br />

when comparing STIC and the Embrace studies.<br />

With regard to outcome the STIC study is able to show a significant<br />

decrease in G3G4 morbidity from 23% to 3% and an improved local<br />

control when the 2D and 3D arm <strong>of</strong> the study is compared. Morbidity<br />

data is not yet mature for the Embrace studies, but interestingly it<br />

seems that the increase in D90 <strong>of</strong> HR CTV is accompanied by an<br />

increase in 2 year local control from 79% with STIC to about 90% in the<br />

Embrace studies.<br />

In conclusion, CT based IGABT according to GEC ESTRO guidelines may<br />

significantly lower the G34 morbidity in a multicentre setting. MRI<br />

based IGABT, use <strong>of</strong> HR CTV for dose prescription and use <strong>of</strong> IC/IS<br />

implants in selected cases may further improve the dose distribution,<br />

resulting in even higher rates <strong>of</strong> local control with no apparent loss in<br />

the therapeutic index.<br />

Table 1 HR CTV<br />

HR<br />

CTV<br />

volume mean,<br />

cm 3<br />

D90<br />

EQD2<br />

IR<br />

CTV<br />

D90<br />

EQD2<br />

Bladder Rectum Sigmoid<br />

D2cc<br />

EQD2<br />

D2cc<br />

EQD2<br />

D2cc<br />

EQD2<br />

STIC 3D, group<br />

35<br />

3<br />

73 62 70 61 58<br />

retroEmbrace 36 84 68 76 63 63<br />

Embrace 35 88 69 77 64 63<br />

<strong>10</strong>8<br />

UPCOMING ICRU/GEC ESTRO RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

IN CANCER OF THE CERVIX (1)<br />

R. Pötter 1 , C. Kirisits 1<br />

1 on behalf <strong>of</strong> the ICRU 38 revision committee & Medical University <strong>of</strong><br />

Vienna, Comprehensive Cancer Center Dept. <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Vienna,<br />

Austria<br />

The first ICRU report on intracavitary brachytherapy (38) was<br />

published in 1985. In 1999 an ICRU committee was initiated to<br />

perform a revision due to various developments in the fields, as e.g.<br />

imaging, treatment planning, dose rates. No agreement could be<br />

found during the following years. A new committee was constituted in<br />

2009 with the task to finalize a report as soon as possible based on the<br />

Gyn GEC ESTRO Recommendations which had become wide spread and<br />

widely accepted in the international community.<br />

The current report draft has a strong focus on the 3D image based and<br />

4D adaptive approach. It also includes traditional concepts for 2D<br />

planning which are linked to the 3D world as much as possible both for<br />

target and OAR. The 3D concepts are based on the Gyn GEC ESTRO<br />

recommendation with some further evolution.<br />

The GTV and CTV concepts follow the classical ICRU traditions with a<br />

special focus on the change <strong>of</strong> CTV during treatment. This has lead to<br />

the introduction <strong>of</strong> a High Risk CTV which represents residual GTV and<br />

surrounding areas assumed to carry a high risk for residual cancer<br />

cells. The HR CTV is identified at a certain time point during<br />

treatment by clinical examination and imaging, which is e.g. after 40<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 43<br />

45 Gy EBRT plus chemotherapy in advanced cervical cancer. An<br />

additional Intermediate Risk CTV is suggested representing the area <strong>of</strong><br />

tumour spread at diagnosis and/or a surrounding area around the HR<br />

CTV. Uncertainties for CTV definition and contouring are subsumed<br />

under the CTV. Uncertainties due to internal motion and due to set up<br />

are recognized in the PTV concept. As the applicator is fixed to the<br />

target by the intracavitary/vaginal applicator, no compensation seems<br />

to be necessary according to current evidence. Also set up<br />

uncertainties seem to be minimal according to current knowledge, if<br />

applicator reconstruction is performed appropriately. In any case, the<br />

addition <strong>of</strong> margins (as in EBRT) is not recommended after<br />

application, in particular not orthogonal to the longitudinal axis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sources. If margins due to such uncertainties are considered, the<br />

suggestion is to design them in the phase <strong>of</strong> planning the application<br />

and to adapt the application as appropriate.<br />

Adjacent (hollow) OARs like rectum, sigmoid, adjacent bowel and<br />

bladder are delineated along their walls and limited absolute<br />

volumes/areas <strong>of</strong> risk are defined, e.g. 2 cm³ and 0.1 cm³. Due to<br />

contouring uncertainties this contouring approach is at present not<br />

recommended for the vagina. Uncertainties due to internal motion are<br />

present for OARs but should not be compensated with adding shell<br />

margins like in EBRT, but rather assessed and individually corrected<br />

for through repetitive imaging.<br />

Dose (rate) per fraction is reported as physical absorbed dose and is<br />

also calculated and reported as isoeffective dose, which is assumed<br />

to correspond to a dose <strong>of</strong> 2 Gy per fraction, EQD2. The total dose in<br />

one value both for the target and for OARs can only be given as EQD2.<br />

The underlying model chosen for these calculations in this report is<br />

the linearquadratic model. Its use is encouraged for the treatment<br />

planning process and for the overall reporting. The limitations <strong>of</strong> this<br />

model are well recognized, and its use has to be mainly understood<br />

from pragmatic reasons. For the calculation <strong>of</strong> the tumour effect a<br />

common α/β value <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> Gy is proposed, for OAR a value <strong>of</strong> 3 Gy. For<br />

doses above 56 Gy per fraction the calculated value seems to<br />

overestimate the effect.<br />

The upcoming ICRU report is based on experiences from 2D and 3D/4D<br />

treatment planning. It summarizes and further evolves the Gyn GEC<br />

ESTRO recommendations as applied so far and proposes these<br />

concepts and terms to create a common language for future efficient<br />

communication within the community to promote research and<br />

development and to improve quality <strong>of</strong> care in the upcoming years.<br />

(For concepts and terms for dose volume parameters and for<br />

the treatment planning process see the following abstract<br />

<strong>of</strong> Kirisits, Pötter on upcoming ICRU/GEC ESTRO<br />

recommendations (2))<br />

<strong>10</strong>9<br />

UPCOMING ICRU/GEC ESTRO RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

IN CANCER OF THE CERVIX (2)<br />

C. Kirisits 1 , R. Pötter 1<br />

1 on behalf <strong>of</strong> the ICRU 38 revision committee & Medical University <strong>of</strong><br />

Vienna, Comprehensive Cancer Center Dept. <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Vienna,<br />

Austria<br />

(For concepts and terms for target and OAR definitions and<br />

biological dose modelling see the preceding abstract <strong>of</strong><br />

Pötter, Kirisits on upcoming ICRU/GEC ESTRO<br />

recommendations (1))<br />

The main parameter for reporting dose to target volumes is D90, which<br />

is already well established and widely reported in singlecenter<br />

experiences as well as for dose response studies. During clinical use <strong>of</strong><br />

D<strong>10</strong>0 it became evident, that DVH sampling introduces major<br />

uncertainties leading to nonreproducible D<strong>10</strong>0 calculations. Therefore,<br />

using the same arguments as in ICRU 83 for IMRT dose reporting, the<br />

D98 is now proposed as an alternative to report the “near” minimum<br />

target dose. In order to quantify high dose volumes within the CTVs<br />

the D50 is included.<br />

In contrast to the initial ICRU 38 report it is recommended to use<br />

point A for dose reporting, which is defined based on the applicator<br />

geometry. It will allow reproducible dose assessment for the 2D<br />

approach, but also consistency and comparability for the 3D approach.<br />

The TRAK, already proposed in ICRU 38 remains an essential reporting<br />

parameter.<br />

For normal tissues D2cm³ and D0.1cm³ are the main parameters for the 3D<br />

approach. The use <strong>of</strong> D1cm³, proposed in the GEC ESTRO<br />

recommendations is not continued as it contains only redundant<br />

information for the dose region already fixed by D2cm³ and D0.1cm³.<br />

Additional parameters for the mid and low dose region are suggested,<br />

mainly reflecting the contribution <strong>of</strong> EBRT. While for bladder, rectum,<br />

sigmoid and bowel DVH parameters are proposed, the situation is<br />

different for the vagina. Due to inherent uncertainties in vaginal wall<br />

delineation and DVH assessment, a point concept is proposed similar<br />

to what has been recommended by ABS, with additions. Especially for<br />

the 2D approach the dose points for rectum and bladder remain from<br />

ICRU 38, but for bladder an additional point cranial to the original<br />

point is proposed.<br />

Beside parameters for evaluation it is underlined in this report that<br />

also the spatial dose distribution within the target and OARs has to be<br />

taken into account. Furthermore, dose to not explicitly contoured<br />

<strong>org</strong>ans at risk has to be considered. The concept <strong>of</strong> reference volume<br />

and treated volume as suggested in ICRU 38 and other ICRU reports<br />

has been replaced by “isodose volumes” which may be linked to<br />

certain dose values selected for various reasons. These values can be<br />

used e.g. for planning aims within a department or for inter<br />

institutional comparisons.<br />

Dedicated sections <strong>of</strong> the report contain recommendations and<br />

information on treatment planning, applicator reconstruction, 3D dose<br />

summation, inter and intrafraction uncertainties, source strength<br />

specification and dose calculation.<br />

A new concept, already proposed in ICRU 83, is introduced for<br />

brachytherapy treatment planning: The “planning aim” is defined<br />

upfront representing a certain “treatment schedule” for a specific<br />

clinical scenario and includes a given set <strong>of</strong> dose and volume<br />

parameters for a specific applicator. During the optimization<br />

treatment planning process, adaptations are performed according to<br />

dose volume constraints for the target and OARs. “Prescription” is<br />

based on the final set <strong>of</strong> parameters which presents the treatment<br />

plan finally sent to the afterloader for irradiation.<br />

The upcoming ICRU report is based on experiences from 2D and 3D/4D<br />

treatment planning. It summarizes and further evolves the Gyn GEC<br />

ESTRO recommendations as applied so far and proposes these<br />

concepts and terms to create a common language for future efficient<br />

communication within the community to promote research and<br />

development and to improve quality <strong>of</strong> care in the upcoming years.<br />

<br />

OC1<strong>10</strong><br />

FUNCTIONAL MRI GUIDED HDR PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY TUMOUR<br />

BOOST: A FEASIBILITY STUDY<br />

J. Mason 1 , B. AlQaisieh 1 , P. Bownes 1 , D. Wilson 1 , D.L. Buckley 2 , D.<br />

Thwaites 3 , B. Carey 4 , A. Henry 5<br />

1<br />

St James Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS<br />

Trust, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics, Leeds, United Kingdom<br />

2<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Leeds, Division <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics, Leeds, United<br />

Kingdom<br />

3<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Institute <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics School <strong>of</strong> Physics,<br />

Sydney, Australia<br />

4<br />

St James Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS<br />

Trust, Radiology, Leeds, United Kingdom<br />

5<br />

St James Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS<br />

Trust, Clinical Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom<br />

<br />

: For standard HDR prostate brachytherapy in<br />

combination with EBRT, a single 15Gy fraction is delivered to the<br />

whole prostate. Tumour control may be improved if regions most<br />

likely to contain higher tumour cell density within the prostate can be<br />

identified and given a higher dose. In this study, the feasibility <strong>of</strong><br />

identifying these tumour regions using MRI, image registration <strong>of</strong> MRI<br />

to treatment planning transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and dose<br />

optimisation to deliver increased dose to tumour regions while<br />

maintaining existing urethral and rectal dose constraints is<br />

investigated.


S44 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

: 15 patients underwent T2weighted (T2W),<br />

diffusion weighted (DWI) and dynamic contrastenhanced (DCE) MRI<br />

scans the day before HDR prostate brachytherapy treatment. For this<br />

feasibility study, all patients were treated using the standard protocol<br />

and the analysis described here was carried out after treatment had<br />

been delivered. Tumour delineation was performed by a radiologist.<br />

Regions suspicious for tumour on all 3 MRI datasets were classed as<br />

gross tumour volume (GTV), regions suspicious on at least one MRI<br />

dataset were classed as clinical target volume (CTV). MRI GTV and<br />

CTVs were manually registered to treatment planning TRUS images. A<br />

margin <strong>of</strong> 3mm was applied to each CTV to allow for contouring and<br />

image registration uncertainties. Dose optimisation was investigated<br />

by comparing the dose delivered to the GTV, CTV and CTV + margin<br />

for (i) the delivered treatment plan and (ii) a modified version <strong>of</strong> the<br />

delivered plan optimising dose to the CTV in a clinically realistic<br />

manner, maintaining urethral and rectal dose at a similar level to the<br />

delivered plan, adding additional HDR needles to target the tumour<br />

area where appropriate.<br />

: In general the suspicious areas on T2W, DWI and DCE MRI<br />

were different but had regions <strong>of</strong> overlap. GTVs were identified in 11<br />

patients with mean volume 0.52 cc (range 0.01 – 1.7 cc). CTVs were<br />

identified in all patients with mean volume 2.6 cc (range 0.<strong>12</strong>3.6 cc).<br />

Though no patient had more than 1 GTV, 5 patients had more than<br />

one CTV. Averaged results for the first 5 patients included in the dose<br />

optimisation study are shown in Table 1. DVH statistics are relative to<br />

<strong>10</strong>0% dose = 15Gy.<br />

Table 1: Mean DVH parameters from dose optimisation study.<br />

D90 (Gy) V150 (%) V200 (%) D<strong>10</strong> (Gy) D2cc (Gy)<br />

(limit 17.5) limit 11.8<br />

Plan:<br />

1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2<br />

1 delivered<br />

2 optimised for<br />

boost<br />

Prostate (whole 17.0 17.2 24.7 36.2 5.7 9.0 <br />

including<br />

CTV)<br />

GTV,<br />

GTV 20.4 29.5 36.0 <strong>10</strong>0.0 3.9 74.9 <br />

CTV 18.6 25.9 26.6 93.8 4.3 54.7 <br />

CTV+margin 18.0 21.9 27.3 82.5 4.8 29.7 <br />

Urethra 17.1 17.2 <br />

Rectum 8.2 8.7<br />

: Functional MRI guided HDR prostate brachytherapy<br />

tumour boost is feasible it is possible to identify tumour regions<br />

within the prostate in the majority <strong>of</strong> patients, and it is possible to<br />

achieve significant increased dose to those regions without violating<br />

urethral and rectal dose constraints. The level <strong>of</strong> dose escalation<br />

varies from patient to patient and is lower if there are multiple<br />

tumour regions, the tumour volumes are large or the tumour regions<br />

are close to either the urethra or rectum.<br />

OC111<br />

IMPROVED APPLICATOR VISUALISATION FOR MRGUIDED BRACHY<br />

THERAPY OF CERVIX<br />

G.P. Liney 1 , C.J. Horsfield 1 , T.J. Murray 1 , A.W. Beavis 1<br />

1<br />

Queens Centre for Oncology Castle Hill Hospital, Radiation Physics,<br />

Hull, United Kingdom<br />

: Following GECESTRO guidelines we are utilising<br />

MRI for Image Guided <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> (IGBT) planning <strong>of</strong> cervix cancer.<br />

The s<strong>of</strong>ttissue contrast from these images is excellent at depicting<br />

the high risk volume and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk. However, one limitation is the<br />

poor visualisation <strong>of</strong> the intrauterine (IU) tube and ring arising from<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> MRcompatible materials (e.g. titanium or plastic) which do<br />

not exhibit a proton signal and appear isointense. Potential remedies<br />

using catheters <strong>of</strong> MRvisible solution have proved unsuccessful;<br />

current practice is to register MRI with CT in which the definition <strong>of</strong><br />

the applicator is much clearer, although the planning system does not<br />

subsequently use the CT numbers. It would be desirable to move<br />

towards MRonly planning removing the repeated use <strong>of</strong> ionising<br />

radiation and as a first step the poor applicator visualisation needs to<br />

be addressed.<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this work was to develop an imaging protocol and<br />

associated postprocessing s<strong>of</strong>tware that can be used to produce a<br />

single MRI dataset providing s<strong>of</strong>ttissue contrast and improved<br />

applicator visualisation.<br />

: A modification to the standard planning<br />

sequence was investigated whereby a dualecho technique was used<br />

to provide two images at every slice location; the first using a short<br />

echo time (TE = 17 ms), to provide protondensity weighting in order<br />

to enhance the contrast between tissue and applicator; the second<br />

image acquired at a longer echo time (TE = <strong>10</strong>0 ms) to provide the<br />

required T2weighted contrast for contouring. Furthermore, the short<br />

TE image has a reduced susceptibility artefact meaning the signal void<br />

more accurately represents the applicator.<br />

Images were automatically processed (MATLAB) to identify the<br />

hypointensity from the central portion <strong>of</strong> the short TE image using an<br />

adaptive histogram threshold with additional morphological<br />

manipulation. These pixels are then 'burnt in' as hyperintensities in<br />

the inherently registered long TE images and converted into a<br />

new DICOM series to be imported into the planning system for<br />

analysis.<br />

The protocol was acquired in a cohort <strong>of</strong> cervix patients to examine<br />

the efficacy <strong>of</strong> introducing the technique into clinical practice.<br />

:<br />

Figure 1 (A) above demonstrates the specific benefits from dualTE<br />

imaging. (B top & bottom) shows a 'burntin' dataset as displayed in<br />

Flexiplan. This combines the T2weighting plus improved visualisation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the ring and IU tube to position the applicator template.<br />

Localisation <strong>of</strong> the applicator was much faster and easier without the<br />

need <strong>of</strong> CT registration. Excellent positional agreement was achieved<br />

when compared to using CT alone (C) and plans were unaltered.<br />

: This study describes a simple but effective technique <strong>of</strong><br />

providing image guidance with the combined advantages <strong>of</strong> both MR<br />

and CT from one single MRI acquisition. Scan time is not extended and<br />

the new dataset is created within a few seconds. The method<br />

described could be used to replace CT entirely and adopt MRonly<br />

planning.<br />

OC1<strong>12</strong><br />

DOES INTERFRACTION CATHETER MOTION AFFECT HRCTV COVERAGE<br />

IN GYNECOLOGIC INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY?<br />

A. Damato 1 , R. Cormack 1 , A. Viswanathan 1<br />

1 Brigham and Women's Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Boston MA, USA<br />

: In this preliminary work we estimated the effect<br />

on HRCTV coverage <strong>of</strong> cranial/caudal interfraction catheter<br />

displacements observed in gynecologic interstitial implants performed<br />

in our clinic.<br />

: Records <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong> patients recently treated in our<br />

clinic with multifraction gynecologic interstitial brachytherapy were<br />

retrospectively analyzed. The patients received between 5 and 9<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 45<br />

fractions twice a day, with reference dose (RX) between 3 Gy and 7.5<br />

Gy per fraction. A clinical plan (CLINICAL) was created on a CT scan<br />

acquired immediately after implantation. The optimization was<br />

performed by manually adjusting dwell times until a satisfactory<br />

compromise was found between HRCTV coverage (maximization <strong>of</strong><br />

V<strong>10</strong>0, D90) and sparing <strong>of</strong> OAR (minimization <strong>of</strong> D2cc <strong>of</strong> rectum,<br />

bladder and sigmoid). A subsequent CT scan (D2_Scan) acquired 4872<br />

hours after implantation was registered to the planning scan based on<br />

rigid fusion <strong>of</strong> the pubic symphysis. The registered D2_Scans were<br />

used to measure the catheter shifts and the <strong>of</strong>fsets (i.e., catheter<br />

slipping into or out <strong>of</strong> the patient) in the cranial (+) / caudal () (CC)<br />

direction. HRCTV V<strong>10</strong>0 and D90 in absolute value and as a percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> RX were also calculated on two modifications <strong>of</strong> the catheter<br />

digitization <strong>of</strong> CLINICAL: by adjusting the location <strong>of</strong> the catheter tips<br />

to reflect the measured CC shifts (D2_ACTUAL), and by adjusting the<br />

location <strong>of</strong> the catheter tips to emulate the CC shift on the D2_Scan if<br />

catheter <strong>of</strong>fsets are corrected (D2_CORRECTED).<br />

: The overall mean <strong>of</strong> mean shift per patient was 0.2±4.7 mm<br />

(range [rg], 5.3 to 11.9 mm). Singlecatheter shifts between 16.3<br />

mm and 20.0 mm were observed. CLINICAL HRCTV V<strong>10</strong>0 was<br />

86.9±13.0% (rg, 62.5% to 99.6%); D90 was 4.6±2.1 Gy (rg, 1.9 to 9.4<br />

Gy); as a percentage <strong>of</strong> RX this was 99.6±25.9% (rg, 54.1% to <strong>12</strong>6.6%).<br />

D2_ACTUAL HRCTV V<strong>10</strong>0 was 85.7±13.7% (rg, 57.0% to 99.2%); D90<br />

was 4.5±2.1 Gy (rg, 1.7 to 9.4 Gy); as a percentage <strong>of</strong> RX this was<br />

96±25.5% (rg, 52.1% to <strong>12</strong>5.4%). D2_CORRECTED HRCTV V<strong>10</strong>0 was<br />

85.8±13.8% (rg, 60.5% to 99.2%); D90 was 4.5±2.1 Gy (rg, 2.0 to 9.4<br />

Gy); as a percentage <strong>of</strong> RX this was 97.2±25.5% (rg, 48.3% to <strong>12</strong>5.5%).<br />

The largest difference between CLINICAL and D2_ACTUAL in D90, from<br />

119% to <strong>10</strong>5% <strong>of</strong> RX, was observed in a patient without a rectum with<br />

a mean shift <strong>of</strong> 11.9 mm (rg, 8.8 to 20.0 mm). The results per patients<br />

are summarized in the Table.<br />

: Interfraction catheter displacements had a small effect<br />

on HRCTV coverage in the patients analyzed. D90 was observed to<br />

degrade in a patient with large cranial shifts; the resulting D90 was<br />

still clinically acceptable. Large interfraction catheter <strong>of</strong>fsets were<br />

observed, resulting in large shifts <strong>of</strong> single catheters. These large<br />

singlecatheter shifts did not affect the HRCTV coverage. Further<br />

investigation on a larger patient sample will be conducted to validate<br />

our conclusions.<br />

OC113<br />

DYNAMIC MODULATED BRACHYTHERAPY (DMBT): CONCEPT, DESIGN,<br />

AND SIMULATIONS<br />

W. Song 1 , M. Webster 1 , D. Han 1 , J. Einck 1 , D. Scanderbeg 1 , T. Vuong 2 ,<br />

S. Devic 2<br />

1<br />

University <strong>of</strong> California San Diego, Radiation Medicine and Applied<br />

Sciences, La Jolla, USA<br />

2<br />

McGill University, Radiation Oncology, Montreal, Canada<br />

: Colorectal cancer is the third most diagnosed and<br />

third leading cause <strong>of</strong> cancer death among men and women in the US.<br />

In particular, patients with rectal cancer present a wide range <strong>of</strong><br />

disease burden, from very limited mucosal disease to quite advanced<br />

and metastatic disease. <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> <strong>of</strong>fers considerable advantages<br />

over externalbeam RT for this site. With judiciously designed high<br />

doserate (HDR) brachytherapy applicators, high conformality can be<br />

achieved to the tumor volume with significant sparing to healthy<br />

tissues. However, all currently available HDR brachytherapy<br />

applicators are limited by their static designs. By allowing a shielded<br />

applicator to dynamically modulate radiation, far better results can<br />

be achieved. Our system, built from groundsup, named dynamic<br />

modulated brachytherapy (DMBT), uses linear and rotational<br />

modulation <strong>of</strong> a well collimated radiation pr<strong>of</strong>ile to deliver extremely<br />

conformal dosages.<br />

: Our proposed system utilizes a high density<br />

cylindrical tungsten shield, which houses an 192 Ir HDR source, to<br />

generate a highly collimated radiation pr<strong>of</strong>ile (Figure 1). Dosimetric<br />

properties <strong>of</strong> the system are obtained by simulations in the Monte<br />

Carlo NParticle (MCNP) package. An inhouse coded, gradient<br />

projection optimization algorithm calculates the optimal dwell times<br />

for each potential dwell position <strong>of</strong> the system based on the patient<br />

geometry and userassigned weightings. The treatment plans are to be<br />

carried out by a high precision robotic arm. We performed a<br />

treatment plan quality comparison study using a previously treated<br />

clinical data <strong>of</strong> 35 total fractions from <strong>12</strong> patients that were treated<br />

using the Intracavitary Mold Applicator (ICMA).<br />

Figure 1. Prototype DMBT system.<br />

: The results show a striking advantage <strong>of</strong> DMBT over ICMA.<br />

Table 1 shows the dosimetric characteristics <strong>of</strong> the two applicators<br />

averaged over all patient plans. While keeping the prescription dose<br />

constant to <strong>10</strong>Gy, the DMBT produced significantly lower dosages to<br />

all normal structures analyzed for every patient. In addition, the<br />

DMBT system had significantly smaller lateral dose spills. Currently,<br />

the DMBT’s only drawback is its longer total delivery time (i.e., three<br />

times that <strong>of</strong> ICMA). However, the times are still well within the<br />

patient tolerances and we are working to reduce them.<br />

Table 1. Dosimetric characteristics <strong>of</strong> the 35 plans between ICMA and<br />

DMBT.<br />

: The dosimetric properties <strong>of</strong> the novel DMBT device<br />

have been investigated using the MCNP simulations and directly<br />

compared to the ICMA using treated patient plans. The translational<br />

and rotational ability <strong>of</strong> the DMBT device gives it a clear advantage<br />

over ICMA for rectal tumors. It allows for more uniform coverage to<br />

the GTV while significantly increasing sparing to the surrounding<br />

healthy tissues. Considering ICMA is currently the gold standard for<br />

intracavitary brachytherapy, our DMBT system is clearly a great step<br />

forward in HDR brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> rectal cancer.<br />

OC114<br />

ROBOTGUIDED DELIVERY OF BRACHYTHERAPY NEEDLES ALONG NON<br />

PARALLEL PATHS TO AVOID PENILE BULB PUNCTURE<br />

J.A.M. Cunha 1 , A. Garg 2 , T. Siauw 2 , N. Zhang 1 , Y. Zuo 3 , K. Goldberg 2 ,<br />

D. Stoianovici 3 , M. Roach III 1 , J. Pouliot 1<br />

1<br />

University <strong>of</strong> California (UCSF), Radiation Oncology, San Francisco<br />

CA, USA<br />

2<br />

University <strong>of</strong> California, Industrial Engineering and Operations<br />

Research, Berkeley CA, USA<br />

3<br />

Johns Hopkins University, Urology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />

: It has been shown in silico that both PPI and HDR<br />

brachytherapy (BT) plans using nonparallel penilebulbavoiding


S46 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

needle geometries can meet all the standard clinical dose objectives.<br />

This work demonstrates the implantation <strong>of</strong> these patterns into pelvic<br />

phantoms using a robotic brachytherapy device.<br />

: Custom pelvic phantoms (prostate, urethra,<br />

bladder, pubic arch, rectum, & penile bulb) were built and CT used to<br />

generate planning images. Structure vertices were transferred from<br />

the Oncentra planning system to a custom needle optimization engine<br />

to generate a candidate needle set (CNS) within the robot workspace.<br />

The CNS excluded all needles that would puncture nontarget<br />

structures and included both parallel and angulated needles (up to 53<br />

deg. from parallel).<br />

For HDR BT, a custom integer program was built to choose a subset <strong>of</strong><br />

the CNS to be implanted (smallest subset such that every voxel <strong>of</strong> the<br />

target <strong>org</strong>an is within a userspecified distance from a needle). The<br />

resulting planned needle configuration (PNC) was passed to the dose<br />

optimization engine, Inverse Planning by Integer Program (IPIP), for<br />

verification that the PNC supports a clinically viable dose plan. For<br />

PPI, the CNS was passed to Inverse Planning Simulated Annealing<br />

(IPSA), which returns a PNC and seed coordinates.<br />

AcubotRND is a 7DoF stereotactic robot with a remote center <strong>of</strong><br />

motion (RCM) allowing needle pivot around the RCM point. Its<br />

reference frame was calibrated to the phantom for registration to the<br />

planner frame using a CTopaque marker. The robot geometry was<br />

used to calculate an analytic inverse kinematic solution to map every<br />

point in the robot workspace: from 3D coordinate system <strong>of</strong> the<br />

planner to 7D coordinate system <strong>of</strong> the robot. The PNC coordinates<br />

were transferred via a s<strong>of</strong>tware interface that translates the two<br />

coordinate systems to Acubot for insertion. After insertion, the<br />

needles were released in place by the automated needle grippers <strong>of</strong><br />

the robot. Needle stylets were passed through the needle and<br />

deposited in the phantom during needle retraction by the human user<br />

making the implanted needle configuration (INC).<br />

: An input system for Acubot was developed that allowed<br />

digital input <strong>of</strong> needle coordinates. A postimplant CT was obtained,<br />

and for HDR BT the INC was digitized for treatment plan generation.<br />

For PPI, the stylets represent a string <strong>of</strong> seeds and spacers, which<br />

were visible for postimplant dose evaluation. Visual inspection <strong>of</strong> the<br />

INC with respect to PNC verified that the penile bulb and pubic arch<br />

were not punctured. (Figure. Top right: PNC. Top left: INC.) Post<br />

implant CT images verified avoidance <strong>of</strong> urethra puncture.<br />

Satisfaction <strong>of</strong> clinical dose objectives <strong>of</strong> Prostate V<strong>10</strong>0>90%,<br />

V150


S48 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

brachytherapy practice. Model based dosimetry should not be<br />

considered a simple investment on a new treatment planning system<br />

mandated by recommendations or current trend, but rather as an<br />

opportunity for concerted, interdisciplinary effort to reach improved<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> care quality in the near future.<br />

118<br />

THE ADVANTAGES AND CRITICALITIES OF NEW DOSE CALCULATION<br />

ALGORITHMS: WHEN PRESCRIPTION DOSES SHOULD CHANGE?<br />

J.L. Guinot 1<br />

1<br />

Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Valencia, Spain<br />

Prescription dose is one <strong>of</strong> the main points to give an adequate dose<br />

in <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>. But we do not use always the same language.<br />

Radiation oncologists have to explain the radiation physicists what we<br />

really need to give the right dose to the right place. Traditionally dose<br />

has been prescribed to points, as in the Manchester system for<br />

cervical cancers, what can be called prescription 1D. When several<br />

points are required in one plane as in the Paris system we can call<br />

prescription 2D. Nowadays brachytherapy tends to be prescribed to<br />

volumes based on image from computed tomography (CT), magnetic<br />

resonance (MRI) or ultrasound (US). This is the 3D prescription. Last<br />

recommendations suggest that this should be the best way to do the<br />

prescription dose, but we can get some troubles that will be<br />

described.<br />

Four situations can happen with 3D prescription: A) When CTV is clear<br />

and target is well defined, as in cervix with MRI or in prostate with<br />

US, D90 is a good prescription, but doses inside the implant can be<br />

very high and inhomogeneous. Moreover, if a cold spot involves GTV,<br />

this can be a reason for failure at that point. B) When target is not<br />

well defined a prescription dose to a volume can get big differences<br />

depending on the person who draws the target, as it happens in<br />

cervix, prostate or breast with CT. A prescription to points or isodoses<br />

is required and D90 is useful to compare and be sure that the volume<br />

is well covered. C) Sometimes a CTV cannot be drawn on the CT<br />

slides, as in breast with closed cavity, tongue tumours that are<br />

removed, or cavum with complete response. Target is defined by the<br />

implant catheters. If the prescription dose to the target is given to<br />

volume at a certain distance from the implant, big differences <strong>of</strong> real<br />

dose can be achieved depending on the chosen distance, therefore a<br />

calculation by the modified Paris system is mandatory. D) In cases<br />

when there is no target because no image system is used, as in lip<br />

carcinoma and boost breast with needles, modified Paris System is<br />

used to prescribe to an isodose, and calculation should avoid<br />

increased doses at the margins <strong>of</strong> the implant.<br />

In 2D prescription doses are given to a certain distance due to the<br />

sharp gradient, as it happens with a single applicator as esophageal,<br />

bronchial brachytherapy and vaginal cylinders, with two catheters in<br />

endometrium and cavum, and with more in contact brachytherapy to<br />

treat skin tumours. CT can be used to test if prescription doses cover<br />

the volume, but high doses on the surface <strong>of</strong> the applicators must be<br />

taken into account and limit the chance <strong>of</strong> modifying doses. An<br />

agreement is required to prescribe doses at a certain distance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

applicator for every tumoral location.<br />

1D prescription can be useful in some cases <strong>of</strong> choroidal melanoma,<br />

esophageal and bronchial brachytherapy, but no longer in cervical<br />

carcinoma.<br />

In all these situations radiation physicists will calculate the isodoses<br />

with different algorithms that can change homogeneity and dose<br />

distribution, and a good communication with radiation oncologists will<br />

always be required. New modelbased dose calculation techniques will<br />

change our view <strong>of</strong> the standard dosimetries. A step forward is<br />

needed, years after ICRU 38 and 58, to adapt the prescription doses to<br />

the 3D, even 4D brachytherapy if we consider the changes in volume<br />

between fractions.<br />

: Prescription is a medical decision. 2. We need to use a<br />

common language to compare different series. 3. With one or two<br />

catheters there is a high gradient <strong>of</strong> dose, and distance must be<br />

carefully chosen. 4. With three or more catheters, prescription<br />

should be done to volume. 5. If the target is not visible, modified<br />

Paris system and prescription to an isodose related to the implant<br />

should be used. 6. If target is not well defined by imaging methods,<br />

prescription can be done to volume but it must be compared with<br />

standard prescription to points. 7. If target is well defined,<br />

prescription should always be done to volume but taking into account<br />

the previous experience <strong>of</strong> prescription to points. 8. The tendency is<br />

the prescription to volume (3D) with imaging systems as it is in EBRT.<br />

9. A common policy regarding prescription should be achieved in all<br />

tumoral locations.<br />

<br />

PD119<br />

REALTIME SOURCE POSITION VERIFICATION FOR MRGUIDED SINGLE<br />

FRACTION HDR PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY.<br />

M.A. Moerland 1 , H. de Leeuw 2 , M. van Vulpen 1 , C.J.G. Bakker 2 , P.R.<br />

Seevinck 2<br />

1<br />

U.M.C. Utrecht, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Utrecht, The<br />

Netherlands<br />

2<br />

U.M.C. Utrecht, Image Sciences Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />

: Single fraction HDR brachytherapy as a<br />

monotherapy requires safe dose delivery, e.g. by realtime source<br />

position verification. Since MRI provides superior visualization <strong>of</strong><br />

prostate, tumour and critical <strong>org</strong>ans, an MRIguided single fraction<br />

HDR brachy monotherapy for localized prostate cancer is being<br />

developed in our institute. In a dedicated treatment suite equipped<br />

with an HDR afterloader and a 1.5 T MR scanner, patient treatment<br />

and imaging can be combined. Objects like an Ir192 source in a steel<br />

capsule cause MR image artefacts, which may be exploited to detect<br />

the position <strong>of</strong> the source in the MR image. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this in<br />

vitro study is to investigate the feasibility <strong>of</strong> realtime Ir192 source<br />

position verification using MRI.<br />

: For realtime position verification we applied<br />

the coRASOR (centerout RAdial Sampling OffResonance) technique.<br />

This special MR imaging technique allows signal distortion around a<br />

perturber to be focused into its exact center by applying a specific<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong>fset [1]. We applied the <strong>of</strong>fset during reconstruction <strong>of</strong><br />

the data. An HDR source was introduced in a plastic needle, which<br />

was inserted parallel to B0 in a 7 cm thick inhomogeneous piece <strong>of</strong><br />

porcine tissue. The source consists <strong>of</strong> a nonradioactive Ir192 cylinder<br />

(0.65x3.6 mm) in an AISI 316L steel capsule (0.9x4.5 mm) connected<br />

to a ferromagnetic steel cable (diameter 0.7 mm). The phantom was<br />

imaged on a CT scanner with 1 mm slices at <strong>12</strong>0 kV and 450 mAs for<br />

comparison. Multislice 2D coRASOR imaging was performed on a 1.5T<br />

MR scanner using a large excitation bandwidth (5.4 kHz), field <strong>of</strong> view<br />

192x192 mm 2 , resolution 2 mm isotropic, reconstruction 1 mm, single<br />

coronal and sagittal slice, slice thickness <strong>10</strong> mm, echo time 0.75 ms,<br />

repetition time 2.9 ms, flip angle 20 o , readout bandwidth 890<br />

Hz/voxel, NSA 2, scan duration 2.9 s. The images reconstructed at the<br />

optimal frequency were thresholded and the resulting positive<br />

contrast images were merged with the onresonance acquired images.<br />

MR and CT images were registered using rigid registration.<br />

: Results <strong>of</strong> coRASOR imaging <strong>of</strong> the HDR source in the<br />

inhomogeneous porcine tissue are shown in Figure 1. The high signal<br />

spot in the coRASOR images corresponds within 1 mm to the tip <strong>of</strong><br />

the source, as measured in the registered CT images. The two 2D<br />

images allow tracking <strong>of</strong> the source tip in 3D. Acquisition <strong>of</strong> the 2<br />

orthogonally placed MRI slices was performed within 3 seconds. Off<br />

resonance reconstruction increased the total acquisition and<br />

reconstruction time by less than one second. Hereby the total tracking<br />

could be performed within 4 s, which is within the range <strong>of</strong> the source<br />

dwell times in a single fraction monotherapy HDR prostate treatment.<br />

: coRASOR MR imaging <strong>of</strong> 2 orthogonal slices allows<br />

source tracking within 4 s, making realtime source position<br />

verification in HDR prostate treatment feasible.<br />

[1] P.R. Seevinck et al. MRM, 65:146–156, 2011<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 49<br />

PD<strong>12</strong>0<br />

FIDUCIAL MARKERS IN COMBINED EBRTLDR THERAPY OF PROSTATE<br />

CANCER: INFLUENCE ON LDR DOSE<br />

G. Landry 1 , B. Reniers 1 , L. Lutgens 2 , L. Murrer 3 , H. Afsharpour 4 , D. de<br />

HaasKock 2 , P. Visser 3 , F. van Gils 2 , F. Verhaegen 1<br />

1<br />

MAASTRO clinic, Physics Research, Maastricht, The Netherlands<br />

2<br />

MAASTRO clinic, Radiotherapy, Maastricht, The Netherlands<br />

3<br />

MAASTRO clinic, Clinical Physics, Maastricht, The Netherlands<br />

4<br />

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec, RadioOncologie,<br />

Quebec, Canada<br />

: When performing combined modality<br />

radiotherapy treatment <strong>of</strong> intermediate or highrisk prostate cancer<br />

with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and low dose rate (LDR)<br />

brachytherapy, gold fiducial markers (FM) implanted at the EBRT<br />

stage are present during LDR seed implantation and subsequent dose<br />

delivery. These FM will create dose shadows perturbing the LDR dose<br />

distribution, to a greater extent than in EBRT, given the lower photon<br />

energies. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to perform an initial<br />

investigation into the perturbations <strong>of</strong> the LDR brachytherapy dose<br />

distribution introduced by the presence <strong>of</strong> FM in the prostate, by<br />

investigating phantom and patient cases.<br />

: A virtual water phantom was designed<br />

containing a single FM. Single and multi source scenarios were<br />

investigated by performing Monte Carlo dose calculations, along with<br />

the influence <strong>of</strong> varying orientation and distance <strong>of</strong> the FM with<br />

respect to the sources. Three prostate cancer patients treated with<br />

LDR brachytherapy for a recurrence following external beam<br />

radiotherapy with implanted FM were studied as surrogate cases to<br />

combined EBRTLDR therapy. FM and brachytherapy seeds were<br />

identified on post implant CT scans and Monte Carlo dose calculations<br />

were performed with and without FM. The dosimetric impact <strong>of</strong> the<br />

FM was evaluated by quantifying the magnitude <strong>of</strong> dose shadows and<br />

the volume <strong>of</strong> cold spots for both phantom and patient scenarios.<br />

: Large dose shadows are observed in the single sourceFM<br />

scenarios, and the shadows are dependent on sourceFM distance (see<br />

Fig. 1 AE) and orientation. Large dose reductions are observed at the<br />

distal side <strong>of</strong> FM, while at the proximal side a dose enhancement is<br />

observed (Fig. 1 D). In multi source scenarios, the importance <strong>of</strong><br />

shadows is mitigated, although FM at the periphery <strong>of</strong> the seed<br />

distribution caused underdosage (


S50 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

wall). Conformity Indexes (CI), related to reported air/seroma and<br />

invagination volumes, were also evaluated.<br />

: Lumpectomy cavity volumes averaged 8.3±0.9cc. PTV_EVAL<br />

and PTV volumes averaged 43.2±9.0cc and 49.5±3.8cc, respectively.<br />

V90 values averaged 98.5±1.9% (TG) and 98.0±2.3% (AC) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

PTV_EVAL volume. Similarly, V95 averaged 97.4±2.8% (TG) and<br />

96.5±3.1% (AC), and V<strong>10</strong>0 averaged 95.3±3.4% (TG) and 94.1±3.9%<br />

(AC) across the entire cohort <strong>of</strong> patients. The V150 'hotspots' averaged<br />

24.4±4.7cc (TG) and 23.9±5.4cc (AC), while V200 averaged 14.1±2.9cc<br />

(TG) and 13.8±2.8cc (AC). The average minimum skin distance was<br />

11.9mm, but the applicator was used in patients where the skin<br />

bridge was as low as 1mm. The average maximum skin dose was 76.3%<br />

(TG) and 73.2% (AC) <strong>of</strong> the prescription dose. The average minimum<br />

rib bridge was 15.7mm, with the shortest 20 days) was<br />

3.3%. Prolonged AUR in the first 500 implanted patients was 6.2% vs.<br />

1.1% in the last cohort. The order <strong>of</strong> implant was considered to be a<br />

significant factor (p = 0.0002).<br />

Overall acute RTOG grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 urinary toxicity rates were<br />

<strong>12</strong>.3%, 45.2%, 34.2 % and 8.1%. The rates <strong>of</strong> late RTOG grade 0, 1, 2<br />

and 3 urinary toxicity were 47.5%, 34.25, 15.1% and 3.1%. There were<br />

no acute or late RTOG grade 4 urinary <strong>events</strong>. The rate <strong>of</strong> acute<br />

toxicity (RTOG grade ≥ 2) in the first 500 implanted patients was<br />

51.5% vs. 31.7% in the last cohort. The order <strong>of</strong> implant was<br />

considered to be a significant factor (p


S52 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

regrowth <strong>of</strong> tumor. This might be the result <strong>of</strong> an inadequately<br />

covered target volume. The use <strong>of</strong> MRIguided brachytherapy would<br />

allow for accurate treatment planning due to precise tumor<br />

delineation and catheter reconstruction. To determine the potential<br />

benefit <strong>of</strong> MRIguided brachytherapy for esophageal cancer, we<br />

evaluated the dose distribution <strong>of</strong> the current brachytherapy<br />

technique on MR images.<br />

: 5 patients with inoperable esophageal cancer<br />

were treated with HDR brachytherapy with a dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong><strong>12</strong>Gy in one<br />

fraction. The proximal and distal tumor borders were visualized with<br />

endoscopy and the position <strong>of</strong> the catheter controlled by fluoroscopy.<br />

The dose was prescribed at 1 cm from the middwell position and the<br />

active length encompassed the visible tumor with a 2 cm margin<br />

proximal and distal.<br />

After treatment the applicator and active treatment length were<br />

reconstructed on MR images using the anatomical structures and<br />

reference markers on the Xray images. T2w MR images in transversal,<br />

coronal and sagittal plane were acquired on a 1.5 T scanner<br />

approximately one week before brachytherapy and used to delineate<br />

the tumor (Fig 1a). The reconstructed dose distribution enabled<br />

calculation <strong>of</strong> the dose to 90% <strong>of</strong> the tumor volume (D90%) and the<br />

volume <strong>of</strong> the tumor receiving 95% <strong>of</strong> the prescribed dose (V95%).<br />

Furthermore, the distance between the borders <strong>of</strong> the tumor and the<br />

<strong>10</strong>0% isodoseline along the applicator was measured to determine the<br />

actual treatment margin.<br />

: For all patients the extension <strong>of</strong> the tumor documented by<br />

fluoroscopy was smaller than the tumor length delineated on the MR<br />

images (Table 1). The intended treatment margin <strong>of</strong> 2 cm was only<br />

reached for 2 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>10</strong> tumor borders. For two patients the <strong>10</strong>0%<br />

isodoseline was on the distal border <strong>of</strong> the tumor and one patient<br />

even demonstrated 7 mm <strong>of</strong> mucosal tumor to be outside the <strong>10</strong>0%<br />

isodoseline (Fig 1 b). Due to the axial tumor extension beyond 1 cm,<br />

the tumor volume was underdosaged in all patients with an average<br />

V95% <strong>of</strong> 50% and D90% <strong>of</strong> 6.1 Gy (Table 1).<br />

Table 1: Tumor length along the applicator as documented on the X<br />

ray images and delineated on the MR images, the treatment margins<br />

and dose coverage based on the reconstructed dose distribution on<br />

the MR images.<br />

Patient tumor<br />

length<br />

on Xray<br />

(mm)<br />

tumor<br />

length<br />

on MRI<br />

(mm)<br />

Proximal margin<br />

(mm)<br />

Distal<br />

margin<br />

(mm)<br />

V95% D90%<br />

(%) (Gy)<br />

1 70 90 24 0 63 7.7<br />

2 <strong>10</strong>0 114 15 0 25 3.7<br />

3 70 89 <strong>10</strong> 23 53 7.3<br />

4 60 90 7 16 38 4.0<br />

5 60 85 <strong>12</strong> 9 69 8.0<br />

: Endoscopic/Xray based brachytherapy for esophageal<br />

cancer seems to underestimate the extension <strong>of</strong> the mucosal tumor.<br />

Even with a large treatment margin <strong>of</strong> 2 cm underdosage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mucosal tumor occurs. Accurate MRIguided brachytherapy, allowing<br />

for conformal treatment planning with a small margin, has the<br />

potential to improve tumor coverage while sparing healthy esophageal<br />

wall along the length direction.<br />

PD<strong>12</strong>7<br />

VAGINAL BRACHYTHERAPY FOR INTERMEDIATE RISK ENDOMETRIAL<br />

CARCINOMA FROM SINGLE INSTITUTION<br />

A. Jhingran 1 , A. Klopp 1 , P. Allen 1 , P. Soliman 1 , C. Levenback 1 , J.<br />

Brown 1 , P. Ramirez 1 , P. Eifel 1<br />

1<br />

U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology Unit <strong>12</strong>02,<br />

Houston TX, USA<br />

: To review the outcome and patterns <strong>of</strong> recurrence for<br />

patients treated with postoperative vaginal apex brachytherapy for<br />

intermediaterisk endometrial cancer.<br />

: Two hundred and fortyfive patients with<br />

endometrial carcinoma were treated from 4/199911/2009 with<br />

adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy alone +/ chemotherapy. All patients<br />

were treated using a Delclos dome cylinder to a total dose <strong>of</strong> 30 Gy in<br />

5 fractions prescribed to the vaginal surface; only the apex <strong>of</strong> the<br />

vagina was treated, usually with 4 dwell positions. The mean follow<br />

up <strong>of</strong> the patients was 57 months (range 1 157 months). The median<br />

age <strong>of</strong> the patients was 63 yrs. (range 3189 yrs.). All patients had a<br />

TAH/BSO and most had lymph node sampling. Nineteen percent<br />

(46/245) <strong>of</strong> patients received adjuvant chemotherapy consisting <strong>of</strong><br />

carboplatin, taxol or a combination <strong>of</strong> the two.<br />

: Sixtyseven percent (164/245) <strong>of</strong> the patients had<br />

endometrioid adenocarcinoma, 14% (34/245) had serous carcinoma,<br />

9% (21/245) had clear cell carcinoma and <strong>10</strong>% (24/245) had MMMT.<br />

Two patients had other histologies. Of the patients with<br />

adenocarcinoma, 7% (11/164) had grade 1 disease, 72% (119/164) had<br />

grade 2 disease and 21% (34/164) had grade 3 disease. Most patients<br />

had FIGO 1988 stage I (75%, 184/245), however, 15% (37/245) had<br />

stage II and <strong>10</strong>% (24/245) had stage III. Lymph vascular space invasion<br />

was seen in 42% (<strong>10</strong>1/245) <strong>of</strong> the specimens.<br />

At 4 years, the rates <strong>of</strong> overall survival (OS), disease free survival<br />

(DFS) and vaginal control (VC) for 245 patients were 88%, 86% and<br />

95%, respectively. There were 13 vaginal recurrences, 7 patients<br />

recurred at the apex and 6 patients recurred distal to the radiated<br />

vagina. Of the 6 patients that recurred distally, 4 were salvaged with<br />

radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Of the apical recurrences, only<br />

one patient was salvaged with surgery and chemotherapy. Most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

patients who had apical recurrences had large pelvic masses or distant<br />

metastasis at the same time as the apical recurrence. Factors that<br />

correlated with poorer DFS were LVSI (p=0.025), grade 3 (p=0.002),<br />

stage III (p=0.005), and MMMT/serous histology (p < 0.0001). Grade 3<br />

histology (p = 0.05) and LVSI (p = 0.02) predicted for vaginal<br />

recurrence.<br />

: Excellent vaginal control was achieved while treating<br />

only the vaginal apex with brachytherapy in this group <strong>of</strong> patients<br />

with endometrial carcinoma. Recurrences distal to the area <strong>of</strong><br />

treatment are rare and <strong>of</strong>ten can be successfully salvaged. For<br />

patients with grade 3 tumors the addition <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy should be<br />

explored to try to achieve better local control and diseasefree<br />

survival.<br />

PD<strong>12</strong>8<br />

DOSE CONTRIBUTION TO INVOLVED PELVIC NODES WITH 3D<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CERVIX CANCER; COMPARISON OF TWO CANCER<br />

CENTERS<br />

W. van den Bos 1 , L. Velema 2 , S. Beriwal 3 , A.A.C. de Leeuw 1 , I.M.<br />

JürgenliemkSchulz 1<br />

1<br />

U.M.C. Utrecht, Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />

2<br />

Erasmus Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, The<br />

Netherlands<br />

3<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology,<br />

Pittsburgh, USA<br />

: Imageguided brachytherapy (IGBT) has<br />

beenincreasingly adopted in the treatment <strong>of</strong> advanced cervical<br />

cancer. Mainadvantage is the doseoptimization to target volumes<br />

with reduced dose tocritical <strong>org</strong>ans. It also <strong>of</strong>fers the opportunity to<br />

measure the dose to pelviclymph nodes visible on T2 weighted MR<br />

images with a short axis diameter <strong>of</strong> ≥ 5mm (pLNN). The goal <strong>of</strong> this<br />

study was to measure and compare the pLNN dose fromtwo different<br />

cancer centers.<br />

: Twentyseven and fifteen patients with<br />

cervical cancer and pLNNtreated with HDRIGBT and PDRIGBT<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 53<br />

respectively at two different institutions wereanalyzed. HDRIGBT<br />

dose was 5.06.0 Gy x five fractions using CT/MRI<br />

compatibletandem/ring applicator with intracavitary technique. PDR<br />

IGBT dose was 32x60cGy x two fractions using Utrechttandem/ovoid<br />

applicator with intracavitary/interstitial technique. PLNN seenon<br />

pretreatment PET/CT or MRI were contoured on all BTplans. D90<br />

(dose to 90%<strong>of</strong> each node volume) was calculated from dosevolume<br />

histograms. Both theabsolute dose and percentage <strong>of</strong> prescription<br />

dose to the node volume wascalculated for each fraction. For each<br />

involved node the total dose for allfractions was calculated,<br />

expressed in biological equivalent doses <strong>of</strong> 2 Gyfractions (EQD2). The<br />

D90 as percentage <strong>of</strong> prescription dose and as EQD2 werecompared.<br />

: 57(HDR) vs. 40 (PDR) pLNN were contoured. In the HDR and<br />

PDR groups, the nodaldistributions were 4 vs. 1 in common iliac region<br />

(CI), 14 vs. 11 in internaliliac region (II), 31 vs. 18 in external iliac (EI)<br />

region 8 vs. 5 in obturatorregion (OB) and 0 vs 5<br />

inparametrial/miscellaneous area. The mean percentage <strong>of</strong> dose to<br />

the nodes was<strong>10</strong>.8% (5.725.1 %) vs. 20.5% (6.893.3%) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

prescribed dose to HRCTV inthe two centers, respectively (p


S54 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

the med group compared to lat; for N0 med: 77.8% vs. lat: 85.5%, p =<br />

0.0038.<br />

: The use <strong>of</strong> a HDR source in boosting the primary tumour<br />

site after external beam radiotherapy with a dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> Gy in 1<br />

fraction is a routine procedure. The local relapse rate and survival<br />

data are very similar to those reported in literature. More than 95% <strong>of</strong><br />

the patients live with their preserved breast. When comparing two<br />

time periods, an improvement both in the local recurrence rate and<br />

the disease free survival rate occurred.<br />

We therefore hypothesize that after BCS ± ST and RT, patients with<br />

medial tumour locations are at higher risk, in particular in N0<br />

patients. The reason may lie in the fact that the pathologic stage <strong>of</strong><br />

the IMC is unknown, and that patients with medial tumour locations<br />

and negative axillary nodes neither received radiation treatment to<br />

IMC nodes nor systemic therapy, while in lateral tumours all patients<br />

with positive axillary nodes underwent systemic therapy and (in part)<br />

supraclavicular irradiation.<br />

Thorough diagnostic examination and more aggressive treatments are<br />

to be considered for patients with medial tumour location and axillary<br />

N0 status.<br />

OC132<br />

EXCELLENT COSMESIS AFTER APBI: DOES DOSE TO THE DERMAL<br />

VOLUME PROVIDE A BETTER PREDICTIVE CONSTRAINT THAN SKIN<br />

DMAX?<br />

R. Vera 1 , D. Todor 1 , N. Bennion 1 , N. Mukhopadyay 2 , D.W. Arthur 1<br />

1<br />

Virginia Commonwealth University, Radiation Oncology, Richmond,<br />

USA<br />

2<br />

Virginia Commonwealth University, Biostatistics, Richmond, USA<br />

: Our goal was identify an anatomic structure and<br />

its associated dosevolume constraints that correlate with excellent<br />

longterm cosmesis for breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant<br />

accelerated partial breast radiation (APBI) delivered with<br />

brachytherapy. A comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> TG43 and Acuros variables<br />

was done to identify the best discriminator <strong>of</strong> cosmetic outcome.<br />

: From 20002005, 45 patients, treated with<br />

balloon and multicatheter brachytherapy, had dosevolume histogram<br />

(DVH) reconstruction that was electronically available. Clinical follow<br />

up was at regular intervals and included history, physical exam, and<br />

mammography. Overall cosmesis was a physiciangraded evaluation<br />

using the Harvard scale from excellent, good, fair or poor. Additional<br />

toxicities, in the form <strong>of</strong> hyperpigmentation, telangectasia, and<br />

fibrosis, were graded on the RTOG scale <strong>of</strong> 04. These patients were<br />

further divided into two populations <strong>of</strong> acceptable cosmesis (AC) and<br />

unacceptable cosmesis (UC). The AC group included patients who had<br />

excellent and good overall cosmesis without any other described<br />

toxicity. The UC group consisted <strong>of</strong> 5 patients with either a fair or<br />

poor overall cosmesis, or a good overall cosmesis and documented<br />

toxicity <strong>of</strong> at least grade 1 hyperpigmentation, telangectasia, or<br />

fibrosis.<br />

In an attempt to include vascular networks to the skin, a new dermal<br />

structure, extending from the skin surface to a 5mm depth, was<br />

created for each plan. Dose rate, maximum skin surface dose, V90,<br />

V<strong>10</strong>0, V150 and V200 to this dermal structure was evaluated and<br />

analyzed. A tree regression analysis was used to compare the<br />

predictative capabilities <strong>of</strong> TG43 and Acuros planning models.<br />

: For the 45 patients with available DVH analysis, there was a<br />

median follow up <strong>of</strong> 35.2 months. The AC group had a mean Dmax to<br />

the skin surface <strong>of</strong> 2.66Gy (SD= 0.47Gy), and the UC group had a mean<br />

Dmax to the skin surface <strong>of</strong> 2.98Gy (SD= 1.01Gy). Based on statistical<br />

analysis, the maximum dose to skin surface did not differentiate<br />

between the two groups. The mean dermal V90 for the AC group was<br />

4cc (SD=2.6cc), and the mean dermal V90 for the UC was 7cc (SD<br />

2.4cc).<br />

The dermal V90 distinguished between the two groups with statistical<br />

significance. Moreover, a threshold value for a dermal V90 <strong>of</strong>


S56 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Ge<strong>org</strong>ia, USA<br />

5<br />

Boca Raton Community Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Boca Raton<br />

Florida, USA<br />

6<br />

Texas Cancer Clinic, Radiation Oncology, San Antonio Texas, USA<br />

7<br />

First Coast Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Jacksonville Florida, USA<br />

8<br />

Arizona Breast Cancer Specialists, Radiation Oncology, Phoenix<br />

Arizona, USA<br />

9<br />

Putnam Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, Palatka Florida, USA<br />

: Noninvasive imageguided breast brachytherapy<br />

(NIBB) is a mammographybased (AccuBoost ® , Billerica, MA),<br />

brachytherapy system whereby the treatment applicators are<br />

centered on the planning target volume (PTV) to direct 192 Ir emissions<br />

along orthogonal axes. This study reports early clinical results on the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> NIBB for breast tumor bed boost with external beam whole<br />

breast radiation therapy (WBRT) as part <strong>of</strong> postlumpectomy<br />

radiation.<br />

: A privacyencrypted online data registry was<br />

created to collect information from 9 independent academic and<br />

communitybased institutions. Data were collected from consecutive<br />

247 individual women with early stage breast cancer (59% invasive)<br />

after breast conserving surgery, who received adjuvant WBRT (mean<br />

47.9Gy in 26±2 fractions) and tumor bed boost (mean <strong>12</strong>.6Gy in 6±2<br />

fractions) with NIBB between Jun 2007 and Dec 2011. NIBB was<br />

delivered before, during, or after WBRT in 46%, 48%, or 5% <strong>of</strong> pts. Pt<br />

age and tumor size ranged from 1988yr and 0.15cm. Toxicity and<br />

cosmesis were evaluated after radiation therapy and graded according<br />

to the Common Toxicity Criteria (v3.0) and the Harvard scale. Mean<br />

follow up was 7 months (range 0.2542).<br />

: There were no locoregional recurrences in the cohort. There<br />

was no association noted <strong>of</strong> cosmetic outcomes with type <strong>of</strong> surgery<br />

(2% oncoplasty, 74% standard or 24% unknown), presence <strong>of</strong> re<br />

excision (29%), presence <strong>of</strong> tumor bed clips (42%) or tumor size. Grade<br />

<strong>12</strong> skin toxicity was observed in 44%, 36%, and 16% during the acute<br />

(13wks), intermediate (426 wks), and lateintermediate (>26wks)<br />

periods. There was no grade 35 skin toxicity event and no poor<br />

cosmesis reports. Overall, cosmeses were excellent, good, fair in 50%,<br />

46%, and 4% (Figure).<br />

Interval time (months)<br />

Cosmesis (CTC v3.0) 0 to1 >1 to 6 >6 to <strong>12</strong> ><strong>12</strong><br />

Fair (%) 0 7 3 6<br />

Good (%) 75 41 54 29<br />

Excellent (%) 25 52 43 65<br />

: These data support that NIBB can be consistently<br />

implemented with minimal shortterm toxicity and no evidence <strong>of</strong><br />

early local failure in both community and academic settings. The<br />

overall cosmetic outcome appears to be stable beyond <strong>12</strong> months<br />

(Table).<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

137<br />

REPEAT BREAST CONSERVATION THERAPY: USA EXPERIENCE<br />

R. Patel<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin, School <strong>of</strong> Medicine and Public Health,<br />

Madison, USA<br />

Abstract not received<br />

138<br />

SECOND CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT FOR IPSILATERAL BREAST CANCER<br />

RECURRENCE: GECESTRO BREAST WG STUDY<br />

J. HannounLevi 1 , D. KauerDorner 2 , J. Gal 3 , V. Strnad 4 , P. Nieh<strong>of</strong>f 5 , K.<br />

Loessl 6 , G. Kovacs 7 , E. Van Limbergen 8 , C. Polgar 9<br />

1<br />

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Radiation Oncology, Nice, France<br />

2<br />

Medical University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria<br />

3<br />

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Biostatistic Unit, Nice, France<br />

4<br />

University ErlangenNuremberg, Radiation Oncology, Erlangen,<br />

Germany<br />

5<br />

University Hospital SH, Radiation Oncology, Kiel, Germany<br />

6<br />

University Hospital Bernes, Radiation Oncology, Bernes, Switzerland<br />

7<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Luebeck and University Hospital <strong>of</strong> SchleswigHolstein,<br />

Radiation Oncology, Luebeck, Germany<br />

8<br />

University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Radiation Oncology, Leuven,<br />

Belgium<br />

9<br />

National Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Budapest,<br />

Hungary<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence (IBCR), radical<br />

mastectomy represents the treatment option frequently proposed to<br />

the patient. A second conservative treatment has been proposed using<br />

either lumpectomy alone or associated with a second irradiation <strong>of</strong><br />

the tumor bed. However, in both clinical situations, the pro<strong>of</strong> level <strong>of</strong><br />

such therapeutic approaches remains low, based on casedseries or<br />

retrospective studies (level C).<br />

In order to analyze the clinical outcome <strong>of</strong> a second conservative<br />

treatment (SCT) using lumpectomy and multicatheter interstitial<br />

brachytherapy (MIB) for IBCR, the GECESTRO Breast Working Group<br />

retrospectively analyzed the results <strong>of</strong> 217 patients (pts) with an IBCR<br />

treated between 09/2000 and 09/20<strong>10</strong> in 8 European institutions by<br />

lumpectomy and MIB (low LDR, pulse – PDR, or highdose rate <br />

HDR). Survival rates without 2 nd local and metastatic progression,<br />

disease free survival (DFS) and specific and overall survivals were<br />

analyzed as well as late tissue breast complications and cosmetic<br />

results. Dosimetric data were reported according to the dose rate<br />

used. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to find<br />

local, metastatic and/or DFS progression prognostic factors.<br />

With a median followup <strong>of</strong> 14.5 years [3.538.2] and 3.9 years [1.1<br />

<strong>10</strong>.3] from primary tumour and IBCR respectively and a median delay<br />

<strong>of</strong> 9.4 years [1.135.4] between primary and IBCR, 20.7% <strong>of</strong> the local<br />

recurrence were observed at distance from the primary tumour.<br />

Median tumour sizes were 15 mm [160] and 11 mm [140] for the<br />

primary and IBCR respectively. Sixteen percent <strong>of</strong> the patients<br />

presented a positive lymph node dissection for the primary tumour<br />

while 69.1% did not undergo new axillary dissection at the time <strong>of</strong><br />

IBCR. Median radiotherapy dose for the primary was 56 Gy [3069.6].<br />

Positive hormonal receptor status for IBCR was 72.8% while 65% and<br />

19.8% received hormonal and chemotherapy respectively as adjuvant<br />

therapy for the IBCR. MIB for IBCR used LDR (<strong>12</strong>.4%), PDR (40.6%) and<br />

HDR (47%) with a median delivered dose <strong>of</strong> 46 Gy [3055], 50.4 Gy [49<br />

50] and 32 Gy [2236] for LDR, PDR and HDR respectively. Five and <strong>10</strong><br />

year actuarial 2 nd local recurrence rates were 5.6% [1.59.5] and 7.2%<br />

[2.1<strong>12</strong>.1] respectively. Five and <strong>10</strong>year actuarial metastatic<br />

recurrence rates were 9.6% [5.715.2] and 19.1% [7.828.3]<br />

respectively. Five and <strong>10</strong>year actuarial DFS rates were 84.6% [78.9<br />

90.6] and 77.2% [67.588.3] respectively. Five and <strong>10</strong>year actuarial<br />

overall/specific survival rates were 88.7% [83.194.8] and 76.4% [66.9<br />

87.3] respectively. One hundred and forty one pts developed 193<br />

complications. Fibrosis was the most frequent complication with 11%<br />

<strong>of</strong> G34 complications. Cosmetic result was jugged as excellent/good<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 57<br />

in 85%. Univariate and Multivariate analysis for prognostic factors <strong>of</strong><br />

2 nd local recurrence, metastatic recurrence and DFS are reported in<br />

the table 1. The results <strong>of</strong> this study suggest that in case <strong>of</strong> IBCR, a<br />

SCT combining lumpectomy plus MIB is feasible with an overall<br />

survival rate at least equivalent to those obtain after salvage<br />

mastectomy. The rate <strong>of</strong> complication remains acceptable with<br />

encouraging cosmetic results.<br />

The data provided by the literature analysis suggest that the rate <strong>of</strong><br />

second local recurrence is about <strong>10</strong>% (ranged from 3 to 32%), about<br />

25% (ranged from 7 to 36%) and about <strong>10</strong>% (ranged from 2 to 26%),<br />

after salvage mastectomy, salvage lumpectomy alone or combined<br />

with a second irradiation <strong>of</strong> the tumor bed respectively. However, the<br />

5year overall survival rates after salvage mastectomy and SCT seem<br />

to be equivalent (≈ 75%) mainly influenced by distant metastatic<br />

progression.<br />

To go forward in terms <strong>of</strong> Evidence Based Medicine, different options<br />

can be discussed such as Phase III or II randomized trials comparing<br />

salvage mastectomy versus SCT, retrospective studies based on a<br />

matchedpair analysis or observatory studies. All <strong>of</strong> the study designs<br />

have their own advantages and disadvantages and need to be carefully<br />

analyzed to be able to propose new treatment options for women who<br />

experience an IBCR.<br />

<br />

OC139<br />

A FAST AND ACCURATE GPUBASED PRIMARY+SCATTER ALGORITHM FOR<br />

LDRBRACHYTHERAPY<br />

A. Bourque 1 , P. Després 1 , L. Beaulieu 1<br />

1<br />

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, L'HôtelDieu de Québec,<br />

Radiation Oncology, Quebec, Canada<br />

: To improve the accuracy while maintaining fast<br />

execution <strong>of</strong> TG43 dose calculations with a fast GPUbased ray<br />

tracing algorithm integrating a point to point scatter dose kernel that<br />

handles medium heterogeneities.<br />

: The method developed derives from the TG<br />

43 formalism. An incremental version <strong>of</strong> Siddons’s raytracing<br />

algorithm is first used to compute radiological distances from sources<br />

to dose calculation points. Then, a regular TG43 dose calculation is<br />

performed, with an added correction factor for medium attenuation.<br />

Finally, a scatter dose kernel spread the SCERMA energy value around<br />

every voxel based on the Thompson approximation <strong>of</strong> the Compton<br />

scattering. Interseed attenuation (ISA) effects and the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

numerous materials on dosimetry were assessed for both regular and<br />

modified TG43 calculations in virtual phantom geometries, and<br />

compared to Monte Carlo (MC) simulations with GEANT4, acting here<br />

as a gold standard. The <strong>12</strong>5 I SelectSeed from Nucletron was used for<br />

validation on a NVIDIA Tesla C2050 GPU. Calculations were tested for<br />

geometries <strong>of</strong> 20x20x20cm 3 and a fine resolution with voxels <strong>of</strong> 1mm 3 .<br />

: An execution time <strong>of</strong> 2.3 s/seed was obtained, representing<br />

an acceleration factor (AF) <strong>of</strong> 5427x over a regular CPU<br />

implementation (Table 1). We expect further reduction <strong>of</strong> execution<br />

time to less than one second per seed for clinical geometries. With a<br />

1cm range for scatter dose, the modified TG43 algorithm was able to<br />

reduce ISA errors from 45% to less than <strong>10</strong>% for some dose calculation<br />

points. The TG43 algorithm improved the accuracy <strong>of</strong> dose deposited<br />

through various materials. At 3cm from the seed, dose corrections <strong>of</strong><br />

up to 2Gy, corresponding to errors <strong>of</strong> more than <strong>10</strong>0%, were obtained<br />

for adipose and cortical bone tissues. Furthermore, considering dose<br />

to medium, the D95 deviation with MC was reduced by 4% in a 56cc<br />

calcified prostate implant simulation. The relative dose around every<br />

calcification was adequately corrected to an error less than 5% (Figure<br />

1), which is within uncertainties conceded by the TG43 formalism.<br />

Stage<br />

Execution time on<br />

CPU<br />

(s/seed)<br />

Execution time on<br />

GPU<br />

(s/seed)<br />

Raytracing algorithm 3366 0.5 6732<br />

Primary dose calculation 0.428 0.6x<strong>10</strong> 3 713<br />

Scattered<br />

calculation<br />

dose<br />

9117 1.8 5065<br />

Total dose calculation <strong>12</strong>483 2.3 5427<br />

Monte Carlo simulation<br />

11520<br />

(2E9 γ)<br />

Table 1 Acceleration factor (AF) for every step in the improved TG<br />

43 dose calculation<br />

: TG43 dose calculations were improved with a modified<br />

algorithm integrating attenuation and scatter corrections while<br />

maintaining fast executions. This algorithm still considers the medium<br />

to be homogeneous for scattered radiation and the range is<br />

underestimated to maintain clinically compatible execution times.<br />

Future work will address these issues to further increase accuracy <strong>of</strong><br />

the dosimetries.<br />

OC140<br />

INFLUENCE OF HIGH ATOMIC NUMBER ELEMENTS IN HUMAN TISSUE IN<br />

DOSIMETRY FOR LOW ENERGY PHOTON BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

S.A. White 1 , G. Landry 1 , F. Van GIls 1 , F. Verhaegen 1 , B. Reniers 1<br />

1 Maastricht University Medical Center, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />

Oncology (MAASTRO) GROW School for Oncology and Developmental<br />

Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands<br />

: Low energy brachytherapy sources such as I<strong>12</strong>5,<br />

Pd<strong>10</strong>3 and electronic brachytherapy sources (EBS) interact with<br />

AF


S58 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

tissue via the photoelectric effect, which is highly dependant on<br />

atomic number (Z) <strong>of</strong> the tissue. Tissue is composed mostly <strong>of</strong> H, C, N,<br />

and O with higher Z trace elements (weight fraction below 1%), like<br />

Na, P and K. The amount <strong>of</strong> trace element varies not only from tissue<br />

to tissue but also from person to person. Cancerous tissue has shown a<br />

tendency to contain a higher concentration <strong>of</strong> trace elements<br />

compared to healthy tissue (Kwiatek et al., 2005). We aimed to<br />

determine the dosimetric impact <strong>of</strong> these trace elements in human<br />

tissues for low energy photon sources used in brachytherapy.<br />

: Monte Carlo dose calculations were used to<br />

investigate the dosimetric effect <strong>of</strong> trace elements present in normal<br />

and cancerous human tissues. The effect <strong>of</strong> individual traces (atomic<br />

number Z=11 to 30) was simulated in a commonly cited healthy s<strong>of</strong>t<br />

tissue composition (Woodard and White, 1986) for 3 low energy<br />

sources where a fixed concentration (0.5% w/w) <strong>of</strong> each trace<br />

element was added. Three other tissue types (prostate, adipose and<br />

mammary gland) were also simulated with each <strong>of</strong> their trace<br />

components excluded alternately to quantify the contribution <strong>of</strong> each<br />

trace to the dose distribution. Finally, the dose differences between<br />

cancerous and healthy prostate tissue compositions were calculated,<br />

using more precise trace compositions(Kwiatek et al., 2005). All<br />

results were compared against a zerotrace tissue composition (HCNO<br />

only). All calculations were reported as dose to medium.<br />

: The presence <strong>of</strong> traces in a tissue produces a difference in<br />

the dose pr<strong>of</strong>ile versus distance from the source that is dependent on<br />

Z, the trace concentration and the source type. Pd<strong>10</strong>3 was the most<br />

sensitive source to concentration change, while the EBS was the least.<br />

LowZ traces (Na) had a negligible effect (3%). There is a considerable<br />

difference in the dose pr<strong>of</strong>ile between cancerous and healthy prostate<br />

(figure 1).<br />

: Trace elements have a nonnegligible effect on the dose<br />

in tissues irradiated with low energy photon sources. This study<br />

underlines the need for further investigation into accurate<br />

determination <strong>of</strong> the trace composition <strong>of</strong> tissues associated with low<br />

energy brachytherapy. Alternatively, trace elements could be<br />

incorporated as a source <strong>of</strong> uncertainty in dose calculations.<br />

References:<br />

Kwiatek W M, Banas A, Gajda M, Galka M, Pawlicki B, Falkenberg G<br />

and Cichocki T 2005 Cancerous tissues analyzed by SRIXE Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Alloys and Compounds 401 17377<br />

Woodard H Q and White D R 1986 The composition <strong>of</strong> body tissues Br J<br />

Radiol 59 <strong>12</strong>0918<br />

OC141<br />

QUANTIFYING THE INTERSOURCE ATTENUATION IN A DUALSOURCE<br />

HDR/PDR AFTERLOADER TREATMENT UNIT<br />

M. Plamondon 1 , L. Beaulieu 1<br />

1<br />

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Département de Radio<br />

oncologie, Québec, Canada<br />

: Much discussions are ongoing in the community<br />

on the commercial availability <strong>of</strong> HDR (high dose rate) afterloaders<br />

which can drive two sources simultaneously, reducing the duration <strong>of</strong><br />

treatments up to a factor 2. The sourcesource and sourcecable<br />

attenuations are not taken into account by current planning systems.<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this work is to try and characterize this effect and its<br />

overall impact on clinically relevant treatment configurations.<br />

: An Ir192 Flexitron source is modeled in<br />

GEANT4 and its dose pr<strong>of</strong>ile in water is evaluated in a grid up to <strong>10</strong><br />

cm. A second source is placed parallel at various distances in order to<br />

quantify the attenuation due to its presence. This pedagogical case is<br />

then transposed to a typical prostate treatment planning. Various<br />

catheter loading patterns (using an actual clinical HDR prostate<br />

geometry) are simulated and compared to the nominal treatment<br />

using a single source. The worst (the two sources always travelling in<br />

two closely located catheters) and best (two sources far from each<br />

other) case scenarios give a respective estimate <strong>of</strong> the upper and<br />

lower bounds <strong>of</strong> the deviations. A measure proportional to the dwell<br />

times and R 2 , where R is the intersource separation, is used to<br />

determine these configurations. Random and minimal deadtime<br />

configurations are also studied for comparison.<br />

: Figure 1 shows the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the deposited energy for inter<br />

source separations ranging from 5 to 20 mm. A maximal effect <strong>of</strong> the<br />

order <strong>of</strong> 20% is observed at small distance and a shadow region with at<br />

least <strong>10</strong>% decrease extends up to <strong>10</strong> cm. A similar study considering a<br />

parallel steel cable instead shows the same behavior but with an<br />

initial dropping <strong>of</strong> less than <strong>10</strong>%. The global impact on actual<br />

treatments is obtained by superimposing the contributions from<br />

catheter pairs simulating the dualsource loading. No significant<br />

deviation is observed in all aforementioned configurations except the<br />

worst case scenario. In that case, a narrow region showing a 5 mm. These effects become negligible<br />

in reallife treatments when source insertions in nearby catheters is<br />

avoided.<br />

OC142<br />

DOSIMETRY FOR HDR HEAD AND NECK BRACHYTHERAPY PATIENTS<br />

USING A GRIDBASED BOLTZMANN SOLVER<br />

F. Siebert 1 , S. Wolf 1 , G. Kovacs 2<br />

1<br />

University Hospital SH Campus Kiel, Radiotherapy, Kiel, Germany<br />

2<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Luebeck and University Hospital <strong>of</strong> SchleswigHolstein,<br />

<strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Luebeck, Germany<br />

: The aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to compare dosimetric<br />

results <strong>of</strong> gridbased Boltzmann solver (GBBS) calculations with<br />

treatment plans computed by the TG43 formalism for high dose rate<br />

(HDR) head and neck brachytherapy (BT) patients. The expected<br />

differences between the standard TG43 and the GBBS dose<br />

calculations, particularly in the head and neck region, is due to<br />

reduced backscattering effects and bony structures close to the<br />

catheter locations. The GBBS uses the electron densities <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 59<br />

computed tomography (CT) scans and is able to take tissue<br />

heterogeneities into account.<br />

: For this study CTbased 3D BT treatment<br />

plans <strong>of</strong> 49 head and neck patients were analyzed. The patient cohort<br />

(15 female, 34 male) was treated with an HDR VariSource afterloader<br />

(Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) between 2001 and 2009 using<br />

an Ir192 source. A single dose <strong>of</strong> 2.5 Gy was applied to each patient.<br />

The mean age <strong>of</strong> the patients was 57.1 years and the mean plastic<br />

catheters used was 5.1 (SD=2). The diagnoses comprised mainly floor<br />

<strong>of</strong> mouth, larynx, and parotis carcinoma. The patient’s treatment<br />

plans were calculated with the BrachyVision v8.8 (Varian Medical<br />

S<strong>of</strong>tware, Palo Alto, CA) s<strong>of</strong>tware using the TG43 formalism and the<br />

commercial GBBS Acuros module <strong>of</strong> BrachyVision.<br />

The dosimetric indices D90, V<strong>10</strong>0, V150, as well as the dose<br />

homogeneity index (DHI) were evaluated and compared between the<br />

two dose calculation methods. Due to the fact that no target outline<br />

could be clinically identified in many cases, the <strong>10</strong>0% prescription<br />

dose outline <strong>of</strong> the TG43 calculation was converted into a 3D contour<br />

and used as an artificial CTV.<br />

: The collected data are presented in table 1. Median D90 and<br />

V<strong>10</strong>0 for TG43 calculation are about 3% higher than for GBBS. The<br />

V150 dose parameter shows a 1.6% increase from GBBS to TG43.<br />

Nevertheless, these are median parameters and clinical assessment<br />

must be performed individually for each patient. The fluctuations <strong>of</strong><br />

the minimum and maximum values <strong>of</strong> the dose parameters are<br />

remarkably higher for the GBBS than for the TG43 calculations. The<br />

dosehomogeneity index DHI is almost constant for both calculation<br />

methods used in this study. An example isodose distribution for both<br />

calculation methods is demonstrated in figure 1.<br />

: The presence <strong>of</strong> air and bony structures close to the<br />

target volume in head and neck HDR BT implants affects results <strong>of</strong><br />

dosimetric calculations <strong>of</strong> gridbased Boltzmann solver techniques.<br />

The extend at which this impacts prescription doses or the<br />

assessments <strong>of</strong> toxicities is still unknown at this time.<br />

OC143<br />

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT FRACTIONATION SCHEDULES IN HDR<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY AS MONOTHERAPY FOR LOWRISK PROSTATE CANCER<br />

P. Mavroidis 1 , N. Milickovic 2 , N. Tselis 3 , Z. Katsilieri 2 , V. Kefala 2 , N.<br />

Zamboglou 3 , D. Baltas 2<br />

1<br />

Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Medical Radiation<br />

Physics, Stockholm, Sweden<br />

2<br />

Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Strahlenklinik Medical Physics &<br />

Engineering, Offenbach, Germany<br />

3<br />

Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Strahlenklinik, Offenbach, Germany<br />

: The selection <strong>of</strong> a proper fractionation scheme is<br />

still an issue <strong>of</strong> debate when moving towards to less fractions <strong>of</strong> HDR<br />

brachytherapy as monotherapy for lowrisk prostate cancer. The aim<br />

<strong>of</strong> the present study is the investigation <strong>of</strong> different fractionation<br />

schemes in order to estimate their clinical impact. For this purpose,<br />

widely applied radiobiological models and dosimetric measures are<br />

employed in order to associate their results with clinical findings.<br />

: The dose distributions <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong> clinical HDR<br />

brachytherapy implants for prostate that were produced by an inverse<br />

optimization algorithm (HIPO) are evaluated regarding different<br />

fractionation schedules. The fractionation schedules that are<br />

compared are: a) 1 fraction <strong>of</strong> 20 Gy; b) 2 fractions <strong>of</strong> 14 Gy; c) 3<br />

fractions <strong>of</strong> 11 Gy; and d) 4 fractions <strong>of</strong> 9.5 Gy. These fractionation<br />

schemes have been previously found to be equivalent based on the<br />

BED for the prescription dose levels. The quality <strong>of</strong> the different<br />

fractionation schemes was evaluated by examining common dose<br />

volume indices for the prostate and the <strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OARs). Their<br />

clinical effectiveness was estimated through the complicationfree<br />

tumor control probability, P+, the biologically effective uniform dose<br />

(BEUD), which were calculated using the Poisson and the relative<br />

seriality models, and the generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD)<br />

index.<br />

: For the different fractionation schemes examined, the tumor<br />

control probabilities are 98.2% in 1x20Gy, 98.6% in 2x14Gy, 97.6% in<br />

3x11Gy and 98.0% in 4x9.5Gy. Similarly, the corresponding total<br />

normal tissue complication probabilities are 9.3% in 1x20Gy, 14.9% in<br />

2x14Gy, 11.3% in 3x11Gy and 16.0% in 4x9.5Gy. Finally, the<br />

complicationfree tumor control probabilities are 89.0% in 1x20Gy,<br />

83.7% in 2x14Gy, 86.3% in 3x11Gy and 82.1% in 4x9.5Gy. The mean<br />

dose, gEUD, mean dose converted to 2Gy per fraction, gEUD<br />

converted to 2Gy per fraction, response probability and BEUD for the<br />

different <strong>org</strong>ans and fractionation schemes are shown in the Table.<br />

Keeping the fractionation scheme 4x9.5Gy as standard, the iso<br />

effective schemes regarding tumor control for 1, 2 and 3 fractions are<br />

1x19.91Gy, 2x13.81Gy and 3x11.11Gy. Finally, the optimum<br />

fractionation schemes for 1, 2, 3 and 4 fractions are 1x19.4Gy with a<br />

P+ <strong>of</strong> 91.5%, 2x13.7Gy with a P+ <strong>of</strong> 88.1%, 3x<strong>10</strong>.7Gy with a P+ <strong>of</strong> 88.7%<br />

and 4x9.1Gy with a P+ <strong>of</strong> 87.6%.<br />

: The present analysis shows that among the fractionation<br />

schemes <strong>of</strong> 1x20Gy, 2x14Gy, 3x11Gy and 4x9.5Gy the first scheme is<br />

more effective. However, after performing a radiobiological<br />

optimization to the different fractionation schemes individually, it is<br />

shown that the 1x19.4Gy scheme is overall more effective, whereas<br />

the 4x9.1Gy scheme is the least effective one. Based on our results, it<br />

appears that an improvement in the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the optimized<br />

HDR dose distributions can be achieved if a radiobiological evaluation<br />

and optimization could be applied.


S60 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

OC144<br />

DOSIMETRIC AND RADIOBIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF MANUALLY AND<br />

INVERSELY OPTIMIZED BRACHYTHERAPY TREATMENT PLANNING<br />

T. Palmqvist 1 , A.D. Wanderås 2 , A.B.L. Marthinsen 2 , M. Sundset 3 , I.<br />

Langdal 2 , S. Danielsen 2 , I. TomaDasu 1<br />

1<br />

Stockholm University and Karolinska Institutet, Medical Radiation<br />

Physics, Stockholm, Sweden<br />

2<br />

St. Olav’s Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Trondheim, Norway<br />

3<br />

St. Olav’s Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Gynaecological Oncology,<br />

Trondheim, Norway<br />

: To compare five inverse treatment planning<br />

techniques with the conventional manually optimized planning<br />

approach for brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> cervical cancer with respect to<br />

dosimetric and radiobiological parameters.<br />

: Eighteen cervical cancer patients treated<br />

with external radiotherapy (2Gy x 25) and MRI guided HDR<br />

brachytherapy (5Gy x 4) were included in this study. For each patient<br />

six plans were created: one manually optimized and five inversely<br />

planned for each <strong>of</strong> the four HDR brachytherapy fractions. Three<br />

inverse planning simulated annealing (IPSA13) approaches, using<br />

different dose objectives not only for the target but also for the<br />

<strong>org</strong>ans at risk were investigated and compared to plans created with<br />

equal dwell times and prescription to target points. The dose was<br />

prescribed to the surface <strong>of</strong> the target volume. The resulting dose<br />

volume histograms were analyzed and compared from the dosimetric<br />

and the radiobiological point <strong>of</strong> view by quantifying specific<br />

dosimetric parameters D90, D<strong>10</strong>0, COIN, and D2ccm for rectum, bladder<br />

and the sigmoid colon, and the probability <strong>of</strong> complication free cure,<br />

P+, respectively.<br />

: A summary <strong>of</strong> the results showing the average dose and<br />

volume parameters for all the six plans performed for each patient is<br />

given in the table below. IPSA led to superior target coverage and<br />

similar COIN values compared to the manual optimization. The manual<br />

optimization led to the better results with respect to the dose to the<br />

most exposed 2 cm 3 volume, D2ccm for the <strong>org</strong>ans at risk. Nevertheless,<br />

the radiobiological evaluation <strong>of</strong> the plan rendered comparable<br />

probabilities <strong>of</strong> complication free cure within the uncertainties<br />

originating from the radiobiological parameters. Overall, the best<br />

results were obtained with manual optimization and IPSA3 with<br />

volumetric constraints.<br />

Dose and volume parameters for the manually optimized plan and the<br />

inverse planning techniques (average for all patients)<br />

Manual<br />

optimization<br />

Inverse planning technique<br />

IPSA1 IPSA2 IPSA3<br />

Equal Target<br />

Dwell Time Points<br />

CTV:<br />

78.3±8.5 87.5±7.9 91.7±6.0 82.5±9.6 64.8±9.6 74.2±6.7<br />

V<strong>10</strong>0 (%)<br />

CTV: D90<br />

4.07±0.65 4.81±0.74 5.23±0.70 4.38±0.83 3.22±0.52 3.74±0.51<br />

(Gy)<br />

CTV:<br />

D<strong>10</strong>0<br />

(Gy)<br />

Bladder<br />

D2ccm<br />

(Gy)<br />

Rectum<br />

D2ccm<br />

(Gy)<br />

Sigmoid<br />

D2ccm<br />

(Gy)<br />

2.13±0.52 2.64±0.63 2.88±0.66 2.36±0.66 1.69±0.41 1.97±0.46<br />

4.77±0.64 5.06±0.50 5.47± 0.64 4.82±0.60 4.88±1.20 4.96±0.92<br />

3.14±0.72 3.37±0.55 3.69±0.67 3.23±0.54 2.47±0.70 2.50±0.59<br />

3.69±0.64 4.02±0.67 4.41±0.73 3.81±0.73 3.19±0.80 3.74±0.84<br />

COIN 0.59±0.08 0.57±0.07 0.55±0.07 0.58±0.07 0.50±0.07 0.57±0.07<br />

CTV:<br />

24.4±5.6 29.4±6.6 34.6±7.2 26.4±6.5 22.5±4.8 27.1±3.5<br />

V200 (%)<br />

: Inverse planning simulated annealing with proper dose<br />

objectives is a good choice when it is necessary to minimize staff<br />

workload and treatment planning time. However, the dose to <strong>org</strong>ans<br />

at risk must be inspected thoroughly and manually adjusted if<br />

exceeding the recommended <strong>org</strong>an dose limits. Nevertheless,<br />

dosimetric and radiobiological criteria are similarly fulfilled with<br />

manual or inverse optimization approaches indicating the potential <strong>of</strong><br />

inverse planning simulated annealing for brachytherapy.<br />

<br />

<br />

146<br />

ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

J.N. Aronowitz 1<br />

1 University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts, Radiation Oncology, Worcester MA, USA<br />

Beginning in 1908, clinicians (urologists, radiologists, and radiation<br />

oncologists) have treated prostate cancer with natural (radium,<br />

radon), react<strong>org</strong>enerated (radiogold, iridium), and kcapture ( <strong>12</strong>5 I,<br />

<strong>10</strong>3 Pd, 131 Cs) radionuclides. There have been intracavitary (urethral,<br />

rectal) and interstitial (suprapubic, retropubic, transperineal)<br />

implants. Source placement has been directed by touch, fluoroscopy,<br />

sonography, and MR.<br />

This review examines the techniques and personalities that have<br />

shaped prostate brachytherapy over an eventful century.<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 61<br />

<br />

PO147<br />

SECTOR ANALYSIS OF I<strong>12</strong>5 PROSTATE IMPLANTS PROVIDES AN<br />

EFFECTIVE METHOD IN COMPARING PRE AND POSTIMPLANT<br />

DOSIMETRY<br />

A.B. Mohamed Yoosuf 1 , M.M. O'Toole 1 , M. Straney 1 , R. Verghis 2 , E.<br />

Napier 3 , D.M. Mitchell 4 , G. Workman 1<br />

1<br />

Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Radiotherapy Medical Physics<br />

Section, Belfast, United Kingdom<br />

2<br />

Royal Group <strong>of</strong> Hospital Trust, Clinical Research Support Centre,<br />

Belfast, United Kingdom<br />

3<br />

Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology, Belfast,<br />

United Kingdom<br />

4<br />

Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Department <strong>of</strong> Clinical Oncology,<br />

Belfast, United Kingdom<br />

: To evaluate <strong>12</strong> sector analysis in the assessment<br />

and comparison <strong>of</strong> pre and post implant dosimetric parameters<br />

during the development <strong>of</strong> an I<strong>12</strong>5 permanent prostate<br />

brachytherapy (PPB) service.<br />

: 50 consecutive men treated with PPB had<br />

dose volume analysis in <strong>12</strong> sectors <strong>of</strong> their preimplant ultrasound<br />

(PIUS) and postimplant CT (PICT) volumes using a Variseed TM 8.0<br />

treatment planning system. PIUS dosimetry was performed 2 weeks<br />

prior to implantation and PICT dosimetry 4 weeks post implant.<br />

Individual sectors were created by dividing the craniocaudal prostate<br />

length into 3 equal lengths creating prostate base (PB), midgland (PM)<br />

and apex (PA). Each <strong>of</strong> these volumes was then divided into four axial<br />

sectors (right and left anterior, right and left posterior). The prostate<br />

volume (PVOL), dose to 90% (D90) and 50% (D50) <strong>of</strong> prostate, volume<br />

enclosed by <strong>10</strong>0% (V<strong>10</strong>0), 150% (V150) and 200% (V200) dose were<br />

recorded in each sector for PIUS and PICT. Differences in individual<br />

sectors on PIUS and PICT were evaluated. Implant quality was evaluated<br />

by measuring conformity index (CI=V<strong>10</strong>0/PVOL) in base, midgland and<br />

apex regions. Adjacent sectors uniformity on PIUS was assessed as<br />

were adjacent sectors on PICT.<br />

: Statistically significant differences between PIUS and PICT<br />

were noted in prostate volume, particularly in PB with PICT >PIUS as<br />

shown in figure (1a). When individual sectors on PIUS and PICT were<br />

compared, statistically significant differences were noted in the<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> dosimetric parameters. The dose in the anterior PB and<br />

PM were significantly lower on PICT (p value < 0.001) and significantly<br />

higher at the posterior PM and PA (p value < 0.05). These changes<br />

were consistent across all analysed parameters. In particular,<br />

significant absolute differences in D90 in equivalent sectors on PIUS<br />

and PICT were seen as shown in figure (1b). Sector analysis in PICT<br />

showed a lower degree <strong>of</strong> conformity in the base sectors (0.71 ± 0.2)<br />

when compared to midgland (0.97 ± 0.1) and apex (0.96 ± 0.1)<br />

regions. Adjacent sector analysis demonstrated uniformity in all<br />

sector sets <strong>of</strong> PIUS and the majority <strong>of</strong> sector sets <strong>of</strong> PICT.<br />

:<strong>12</strong> sector analysis allows rapid assessment <strong>of</strong>, PIUS and<br />

PICT, dose and volume homogeneity. It <strong>of</strong>fers a scientific method <strong>of</strong><br />

identifying areas <strong>of</strong> relative over and under dosing on PICT when<br />

compared with PIUS providing both clinicians and physicists with a<br />

learning tool to refine dosimetric analysis and highlight sectors where<br />

implant quality could be improved.<br />

PO148<br />

OUTCOME AND TOXICITY AFTER SALVAGE PROSTATECTOMY,<br />

CRYOSURGERY AND BRACHYTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER<br />

RECURRENCES<br />

M. Peters 1 , M.R. Moman 1 , H.G. van der Poel 2 , H. Vergunst 3 , I.J. de<br />

Jong 4 , P.L.M. Vijverberg 5 , J.J. Battermann 1 , S. Horenblas 2 , M. Vulpen 1<br />

1<br />

University Medical Center, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />

2<br />

Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department <strong>of</strong> Urology, Amsterdam,<br />

The Netherlands<br />

3<br />

CanisiusWilhelmina Hospital Nijmegen The Netherlands,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Urology, Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />

4<br />

University Medical Center Groningen The Netherlands, Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Urology, Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />

5<br />

St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein The Netherlands, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Urology, Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />

: Current salvage treatments for recurrent cancer<br />

<strong>of</strong> the prostate after primary radiation therapy include radical<br />

prostatectomy, cryosurgery and brachytherapy. Because toxicity and<br />

failure rates are considerable, salvage treatments are not commonly<br />

performed. As most centers perform only one preferred salvage<br />

technique, literature only describes single center outcomes from a<br />

single salvage technique with a limited number <strong>of</strong> patients. In this<br />

overview, five high volume Dutch centers describe their toxicity and<br />

outcome data using different salvage techniques. This provides a view<br />

on how salvage is performed in clinical practice in the Netherlands.<br />

: <strong>12</strong>9 patients from 5 different centers in the<br />

Netherlands were retrospectively analyzed. Biochemical failure was<br />

defined as PSA > 0,1 ng/ml for the salvage >prostatectomy group (n =<br />

44) and PSA nadir + 2,0 ng/ml (Phoenix definition) for the salvage<br />

cryosurgery (n = 54) and salvage brachytherapy group (n = 31).<br />

Toxicity was scored according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for<br />

Adverse Events (CTCAE v3.0).<br />

: Biochemical failure occurred in 25 (81%) patients in the<br />

brachytherapy group (mean followup 29±24 months), 29 (66%)<br />

patients in the prostatectomygroup (mean followup 22± 25 months)<br />

and 33 (61%) patients in the cryosurgery group (mean followup 14± 11<br />

months). Severe (grade >3) genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity<br />

was observed in up to 30% <strong>of</strong> patients in all three groups (table 1).<br />

: This overview shows clinical practice <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer<br />

salvage. Significant failure and toxicity rates are observed, regardless


S62 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> salvage technique. Patients should be selected with great care<br />

before <strong>of</strong>fering one <strong>of</strong> these salvage treatment strategies.<br />

PO149<br />

DEVELOPMENT OF A PRACTICAL PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY TRAINING<br />

PHANTOM<br />

K. Forsythe 1 , A. Svoboda 1 , R.G. Stock 1<br />

1<br />

Mount Sinai Medical Center, Dept. Radiation Oncology, New York,<br />

USA<br />

: Training in prostate brachytherapy remains non<br />

standardized and a suitable training phantom for practicing fully<br />

simulated implants does not exist. The only commercially available<br />

training phantom is prohibitively expensive (~$400) and its brittle gel<br />

matrix cannot withstand the trauma <strong>of</strong> needlesticks without suffering<br />

permanent needle track scars which render it incompatible with TRUS<br />

imaging. Our objective was to develop a reusable training phantom<br />

that was 1) composed <strong>of</strong> hydrocolloids with rheological properties<br />

resilient to repeated needle sticks, 2) compatible with both TRUS and<br />

CT imaging, 3) composed <strong>of</strong> inexpensive materials, and 4) can be<br />

made relatively easily by hand.<br />

: The phantom’s basic model consists <strong>of</strong> a gel<br />

based prostate with a Foley catheter as standin for the urethra and a<br />

gelbased rectum, both <strong>of</strong> which are encompassed by a gelbased<br />

perineum. Two sets <strong>of</strong> molds are made for casting the prostate and<br />

rectum, and once casted they are embedded within the surrounding<br />

gelbased perineum. After construction, the phantom is fixed to the<br />

procedure table and the user may perform a fully simulated TRUS<br />

guided implant. After completion <strong>of</strong> the implant, the phantom may<br />

undergo CT imaging so that postimplant dosimetry can be performed<br />

and the quality <strong>of</strong> the implant may be evaluated by standard dose<br />

metrics (D90, V<strong>10</strong>0, RV<strong>10</strong>0, UrethraV150, etc.)<br />

For the construction <strong>of</strong> the prostate mold, rectal wall mold, and<br />

phantom container: NSP S<strong>of</strong>t clay ($4.25/lb), Van Aken clay<br />

($5.22/2lbs), Mold Star 15 Silicone ($30.99/pint), foam core poster<br />

board ($0.64/sq ft), 1’ <strong>of</strong> ¾' PVC pipe ($0.99), 1’ <strong>of</strong> 1½'' PVC pipe<br />

($0.99), ¾' PVC pipe coupling adaptor ($0.49), 1½' PVC pipe coupling<br />

adaptor ($0.89), Propoxy Epoxy ($7.55/4.8oz), 6' plastic funnel<br />

($1.82), 1 gallon Rubbermaid container ($9.42). Reagents for gel<br />

based components: Foley catheter ($2.00), Barium Sulfate<br />

($1.50/30g), agar powder ($2.34/55g), glycerine ($0.27/20g).<br />

: The phantom’s container and casting molds are all durable<br />

products which may be reused indefinitely and have a subtotal cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> $62.85. The gelbased components <strong>of</strong> the phantom have a subtotal<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> $6.11 and may be discarded after each use or remelted and<br />

recast into refurbished gelbased components. The gelbased<br />

components <strong>of</strong> the phantom are compatible with performing a fully<br />

simulated TRUSguided implant without the troublesome permanent<br />

needle track scars <strong>of</strong> commercially available phantoms; the gelbased<br />

components are also easily distinguishable on CT imaging which<br />

permits postimplant dosimetry. Repeated practice with the phantom<br />

can yield increased pr<strong>of</strong>iciency as measured by standard dose metrics<br />

which can be plotted to document a user's learning curve for the<br />

procedure.<br />

: This reusable phantom has a significantly lower cost<br />

than commercially available phantoms. It is also the only training<br />

phantom that is both TRUS and CT compatible, which permits users to<br />

practice fully simulated implants and to objectively evaluate their<br />

performance. As a training aid, this phantom can help improve the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> prostate brachytherapy implants on a wide scale.<br />

PO150<br />

THE IMPACT OF GEOMETRIC INACCURACIES ON RESULTING DOSE<br />

DISTRIBUTION DURING HDR PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

P. Paluska 1 , M. Hodek 1 , L. Kasaova 1 , I. Sirak 1 , M. Zouhar 1 , M. Vosmik 1 ,<br />

J. Petera 1<br />

1<br />

University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Department <strong>of</strong> Oncology and<br />

Radiotherapy, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic<br />

: Highdose rate interstitial brachytherapy (BT) can<br />

be applied as a boost treatment in combination with external beam<br />

radiation therapy (EBRT) <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer. Transrectal ultrasound<br />

(TRUS) guided transperineal temporary brachytherapy using an<br />

iridium192 stepping source and a remote afterloading technique<br />

represents the standard <strong>of</strong> interstitial prostate BT. Simplified model<br />

<strong>of</strong> parallel linear guide needles in the planning s<strong>of</strong>tware doesn’t<br />

represent the real implant precisely. The purpose <strong>of</strong> our study was to<br />

evaluate the impact <strong>of</strong> needles’ representation inaccuracies and<br />

changes in anatomy during implantation on resulting dose distribution.<br />

: The implantation starts with acquisition <strong>of</strong><br />

axial TRUS images in steps <strong>of</strong> 5 mm distance from base to apex <strong>of</strong><br />

prostate. TRUS images are transferred to planning s<strong>of</strong>tware, where<br />

CTV, urethra and rectum are delineated. Initial needle geometry,<br />

prepared during preplanning one day before implantation, is<br />

reproduced. After insertion <strong>of</strong> each guide needle, the needle<br />

coordinates are corrected based on it’s position on central transversal<br />

TRUS image, but the needles are still represented as linear and<br />

parallel. Volume optimization <strong>of</strong> the target dose distribution is<br />

performed to achieve the best possible CTV coverage by 8 Gy isodose,<br />

urethral doses < <strong>10</strong> Gy and rectal doses < 6.4 Gy.<br />

For the purpose <strong>of</strong> this study, TRUS images were acquired after the<br />

implantation <strong>of</strong> all the needles. Postimplant TRUS images were fused<br />

with preimplant ones based on template invariable geometry. CTV,<br />

urethra and rectum were delineated and contours’ positions were<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 63<br />

compared with positions on preimplant images. The implant model<br />

was corrected according to the real situation <strong>of</strong> nonparallel needles,<br />

as visible on postimplant images. The irradiation plan was<br />

recalculated with the original dwell times. CTV dose coverage and<br />

maximal urethral and rectal doses were compared with the original<br />

ones.<br />

: Eleven applications on six patients were analyzed. Maximal<br />

urethra contour changes varied between 2 and 7 mm, median 4 mm.<br />

Maximal observed change in the needle position was 5 mm.<br />

Differences in CTV dose coverage varied between 3.7 % and 0.3 %,<br />

with a mean result <strong>of</strong> 1.1 %. Differences in maximal rectal dose<br />

varied between 0.1 Gy and 1.7 Gy, in 9 cases from 11 total the<br />

maximal rectal dose was higher than the original one. Differences in<br />

maximal urethral dose varied between 1.4 Gy and 1.9 Gy, in 7 cases<br />

from 11 total the maximal urethral dose was higher than the original<br />

one.<br />

: Inaccurate implant model assuming parallel linear guide<br />

needles and rigid anatomy can lead to a significant underestimation <strong>of</strong><br />

urethral and rectal doses. Especially needles close to urethra and<br />

rectum should be modeled with a special care.<br />

PO151<br />

LONG TERM RESULTS OF HDR BRACHYTHERAPY IN MEN OLDER THAN 75<br />

WITH LOCALIZED CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE<br />

R. Soumarova 1 , L. Homola 1 , H. Perkova 1<br />

1 Radioterapie a.s., radiation oncology, Novy Jicin, Czech Republic<br />

: Prostate cancer is an illness with a high<br />

incidence, especially among older men. The choice <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

option among men above 75 years is however not clear. Radical<br />

prostatectomy in this age group is connected with a relatively high<br />

morbidity. A further possibility <strong>of</strong> curative treatment is radiotherapy,<br />

which can be administered in the form <strong>of</strong> external beam or in<br />

combination with high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. The aim <strong>of</strong> our<br />

work was to ascertain how HDR brachytherapy is tolerated among men<br />

older than 75 and how associated diseases can influence the tolerance<br />

to this treatment. Of interest to us were the treatment results and<br />

mortality from other diseases.<br />

: We analysed a sample <strong>of</strong> 20 men above 75<br />

years old (median 77 years), who were undergoing treatment by a<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> external radiotherapy and brachytherapy. 16 (80 %) <strong>of</strong><br />

them had prostate cancer with a intermediate and high risk <strong>of</strong><br />

recurrence, 4 had low risk prostate cancer. Most patients – 14 (70 %)<br />

had less than two comorbidities.<br />

: The median observation period was 57 months. No<br />

perioperative complications were recorded. Acute genitourinary<br />

toxicity (GU) to a maximum grade <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong> manifested in 60% <strong>of</strong> cases.<br />

Acute gastrointestinal toxicity (GIT) was observed only at grade 1, and<br />

in 25% <strong>of</strong> cases. Late GU toxicity occurred in 35% <strong>of</strong> patients, with<br />

only one such <strong>of</strong> grade 3; late GIT toxicity was recorded at grade 1<br />

only in 3 patients (15%). 70% <strong>of</strong> the men lived posttreatment longer<br />

than 3 years, 50% at present live more than 5 years. Longterm<br />

biochemical remission was achieved in 18 patients (90%).<br />

: HDR BRT is possible and welltolerated in older men<br />

above 75 years in good condition and without serious intercurrence.<br />

Wellselected older patients with higherrisk tumours and without<br />

serious comorbidities undoubtedly benefit from radical treatment<br />

when compared with watchful waiting.<br />

PO152<br />

EXPLORING THE DOSIMETRIC AND RADIOBIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF<br />

PROSTATE SEED LOSS AND MIGRATION<br />

C. Knaup 1 , C. Esquivel 1 , P. Mavroidis 2 , S. Stathakis 1 , N. Papanikolaou 1<br />

1 University <strong>of</strong> Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Cancer<br />

Therapy & Research Center, San Antonio, USA<br />

2 Karolinska Institutet, Medical Physics, Stockholm, Sweden<br />

: Low doserate brachytherapy is commonly used<br />

to treat prostate cancer. However, once implanted, the seeds are<br />

vulnerable to loss and movement. Ideally, the postimplant evaluation<br />

would quantify these effects. However, many clinicians opt for day 0<br />

postimplant scanning based on logistical issues and patient<br />

convenience. Therefore a general estimation <strong>of</strong> these effects may be<br />

useful for making patient care decisions when seeds are lost after the<br />

postimplant scan. The goal <strong>of</strong> this work was to explore the dosimetric<br />

and radiobiological effects <strong>of</strong> the types <strong>of</strong> seed loss and migration<br />

commonly seen in prostate brachytherapy. The results may be a<br />

useful guide for clinicians confronted with the problem <strong>of</strong> seed loss<br />

following implantation.<br />

: Five patients were used in this study. For<br />

each patient three treatment plans were created using Iodine<strong>12</strong>5,<br />

Palladium<strong>10</strong>3 and Cesium131 seeds. The three seeds that were<br />

closest to the urethra were identified and modeled as the seeds lost<br />

through the urethra. The three seeds closest to the exterior <strong>of</strong><br />

prostatic capsule were identified and modeled as those lost from the<br />

prostate periphery. The seed locations and <strong>org</strong>an contours were<br />

exported from Prowess and used by inhouse s<strong>of</strong>tware to perform the<br />

dosimetric and radiobiological evaluation. The radiobiological<br />

evaulation was based on the linearquadratic model. Seed loss was<br />

simulated by removing 1, 2 or 3 seeds near the urethra 0, 2 or 4 days<br />

after the implant or removing seeds near the exterior <strong>of</strong> the prostate<br />

14, 21 or 28 days after the implant.<br />

: Loss <strong>of</strong> one, two or three seeds through the urethra results in<br />

a D90 reduction <strong>of</strong> 2%, 5% and 7% loss respectively. Due to delayed loss<br />

<strong>of</strong> peripheral seeds, the dosimetric effects are less severe than for<br />

loss through the urethra. However, while the dose reduction is modest<br />

for multiple lost seeds, the reduction in tumor control probability was<br />

minimal.<br />

Table 1. Results <strong>of</strong> the dosimetric and radiobiological effect <strong>of</strong> central<br />

seed loss through the urethra for implants with I<strong>12</strong>5 seeds.<br />

<strong>12</strong>5<br />

I Missing Dmin (Gy) D50 (Gy) D80 (Gy) D90 (Gy) V<strong>10</strong>0 (%) V150 (%) TCP (%)<br />

Day 0 1 1.4 ± 1.4 4.0 ± 0.7 3.7 ± 1.0 2.8 ± 0.7 1.8 ± 1.7 2.0 ± 0.4 0.0 ± 0.0<br />

2 4.4 ± 3.2 7.7 ± 1.3 7.0 ± 1.5 5.9 ± 1.0 4.2 ± 3.4 3.3 ± 0.6 0.1 ± 0.1<br />

3 8.7 ± 4.3 <strong>10</strong>.4 ± 2.1 9.7 ± 1.3 9.1 ± 2.7 5.9 ± 4.0 4.1 ± 0.7 0.4 ± 0.3<br />

Day 2 1 1.4 ± 1.4 3.9 ± 0.7 3.5 ± 1.0 2.7 ±0.7 1.7 ±1.6 1.9 ± 0.5 0.0 ± 0.0<br />

2 4.2 ± 2.9 7.5 ± 1.3 6.7 ± 1.5 5.6 ±1.0 4.0 ± 3.4 3.2 ± 0.6 0.1 ± 0.1<br />

3 8.0 ± 4.0 <strong>10</strong>.2 ± 2.0 9.3 ± 1.4 8.7 ± 2.6 5.7 ± 3.9 4.0 ± 0.7 0.3 ± 0.4<br />

Day 4 1 1.4 ± 1.3 3.8 ± 0.7 3.4 ± 0.9 2.6 ± 0.7 1.6 ± 1.5 1.9 ± 0.5 0.0 ± 0.0<br />

2 4.0 ± 2.7 7.4 ± 1.2 6.5 ± 1.4 5.4 ± 1.0 3.9 ± 3.2 3.1 ± 0.6 0.1 ± 0.1<br />

3 7.3 ± 3.8 9.9 ± 2.0 9.0 ± 1.4 8.4 ± 2.5 5.5 ± 3.8 4.0 ± 0.7 0.3 ± 0.3<br />

: The goal <strong>of</strong> this work was to explore the dosimetric and<br />

radiobiological effects <strong>of</strong> the types <strong>of</strong> seed loss and migration<br />

commonly seen in prostate brachytherapy. The results presented show<br />

that loss <strong>of</strong> multiple seeds can cause a substantial reduction <strong>of</strong> D90<br />

coverage. However, for the patients in this study the dose reduction<br />

was not seen to reduce tumor control probability.<br />

PO153<br />

PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTRE DOSIMETRY STUDY OF I<strong>12</strong>5 PROSTATE<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY PERFORMED AFTER TURP<br />

C. Salembier 1 , A. Rijnders 1 , A. Henry 2 , P. Nieh<strong>of</strong>f 3 , F.A. Siebert 3 , P.<br />

Hoskin 4<br />

1<br />

Europe Hospitals Site StElisabeth, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />

Oncology, Brussels, Belgium<br />

2<br />

St James', Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom<br />

3<br />

UHSH, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radiooncologie, Kiel,<br />

Germany<br />

4<br />

Mount Vernon, Cancer Center, Northwood, United Kingdom<br />

: To evaluate in a multicentre setting the ability <strong>of</strong><br />

centres to perform preimplant permanent prostate brachytherapy<br />

planning using Iodine<strong>12</strong>5 fulfilling dosimetric goals and constraints<br />

based on GECESTRO guidelines in the setting <strong>of</strong> implantation after<br />

prior TURp.<br />

: A reference transrectal ultrasound image set<br />

<strong>of</strong> the prostate gland from a patient who had undergone TURp having<br />

a significant residual cavity was used. Contouring <strong>of</strong> the prostate,


S64 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

clinical target volume and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk was performed by the co<br />

ordinating centre before image export. This was based on the existing<br />

GECESTRO guidelines but with small adaptations given the postTURp<br />

setting. Goals and constraints regarding the dosimetry were defined.<br />

: 17 centres participated in this study. The mean number <strong>of</strong><br />

needles used was 18 ( min<strong>10</strong> max 25). Mean number <strong>of</strong> seeds was 52<br />

(min 27 max 63). 8 out <strong>of</strong> the 17 centres applied a classical seed<br />

spacing with regular 1 cm seed centretocentre in the majority <strong>of</strong><br />

their needles, whereas 9 centres used specially loaded needles that<br />

differed by having extra spacing between seeds. The mean seed<br />

strength used was 0,486 U (range 0,458 – 1,0 U) or 0,383 mCi (range<br />

0,361 – 0,787 mCi). The mean activity <strong>of</strong> the total implant was 27,8 U<br />

(range 25,7 – 33,9 U) or 21,9 mCi (range20,2 – 26,7 mCi). All centres<br />

fulfilled the requested dosimetry constraints for the prostate volume.<br />

The mean Vp<strong>10</strong>0 was 98 % (range 97,06 99,94%), the mean Dp90<br />

was 187 Gy (range 159 219 Gy), the mean Vp150 was 73% (range 42 <br />

90%) and the mean Vp200 was 35 % (range 18 56%). All but 2 centres<br />

fulfilled the CTV dosimetric constraints and these two centres<br />

deviated from the requirements by only a small amount which could<br />

have been corrected by movement <strong>of</strong> one or two seeds by a few<br />

millimetres. The mean V<strong>10</strong>0 for the CTV was 96,5 % (range 94 <br />

99,41%), mean V150 was 62 % (range 41 – 75,4%) and mean D90 was<br />

171 Gy (range 157 – 186 Gy). In terms <strong>of</strong> urethral dosimetry, all but 2<br />

institutions were able to fulfil the protocol requirements. These 2<br />

centres exceeded the Du30 constraint achieving 133 Gy and 134 Gy<br />

in contrast to the protocol constraint <strong>of</strong> ≤130Gy). The mean Du30 was<br />

118 Gy (min 99 – max 134 Gy) and the mean Du<strong>10</strong> was <strong>12</strong>4 Gy (min <strong>10</strong>4<br />

– max 148 Gy). All centres achieved the required rectal dose<br />

constraints. Sector analysis was performed for all plans. Given the<br />

small prostatic volume, eight segments were defined. The typical<br />

postTURp defect results in very small anterior segments. For each<br />

segment, D90 and V<strong>10</strong>0 were calculated. 3 centres showed perfect<br />

coverage for D90 and V<strong>10</strong>0 for all defined segments. Four centres had<br />

a clear underdosage in the basal anterior segments and fourteen<br />

centres had an underdosage in the apical anterior segments.<br />

: Consistent preimplantation planning with adherence to<br />

protocol guidelines is feasible in a postTURp setting. This study<br />

validates the proposed standardized contouring in this specific<br />

anatomical setting and the proposed dose goals and constraints. A<br />

prospective study evaluating the outcome <strong>of</strong> prostate I<strong>12</strong>5<br />

brachytherapy performed after transurethral resection <strong>of</strong> the prostate<br />

can therefore be undertaken with an expectation <strong>of</strong> consistent<br />

dosimetry in the multicentre setting.<br />

PO154<br />

FOCAL BRACHYTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER: A PILOT STUDY<br />

J.M. Cosset 1 , X. Cathelineau 2 , N. Pierrat 1 , D. Hajage 1 , G. Wakil 1 , F.<br />

Rozet 2 , E. Barret 2 , G. Vallancien 2<br />

1 Institut Curie, Radiotherapy, Paris, France<br />

2 Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Urology, Paris, France<br />

: Permanent implant prostate brachytherapy (using<br />

Iodine<strong>12</strong>5 seeds) is now recognized as one <strong>of</strong> the standard therapies<br />

for lowrisk localized prostate cancer. For strictly selected patients,<br />

focal therapy is nowadays increasingly proposed to limit toxicity and<br />

permit easier salvage in case <strong>of</strong> failure. <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, which is able<br />

to treat a welldefined partial prostate volume at a welldefined dose<br />

level, appears to be particularly well adapted to focal prostate<br />

therapy.<br />

: Focal brachytherapy was initiated by our<br />

group in February 20<strong>10</strong>, according to a protocol approved by our local<br />

ethics committee, with all patients signing an informed consent.<br />

Patient selection is based on (at least) two series <strong>of</strong> prostate biopsies<br />

and on a highresolution MRI. Only patients with very limited and<br />

localized tumors, according to strict criteria, were selected for the<br />

procedure. The technique is directly derived from the 'realtime'<br />

procedure with the implantation <strong>of</strong> 'free' Iodine<strong>12</strong>5 seeds, with<br />

dynamic dose calculation (continuous feedback as per the real<br />

positioning <strong>of</strong> each seed). We chose to deliver to the focal volume the<br />

dose usually recommended by GECESTRO for the whole prostate (145<br />

Gy).<br />

: To date, <strong>12</strong> focal implantations were performed. The treated<br />

volume corresponded to a mean value <strong>of</strong> 34 % <strong>of</strong> the total prostatic<br />

volume (range 2048 %). For the focal volume, mean D90 was 182 Gy (<br />

range 176188 Gy), and the mean V<strong>10</strong>0 was 99.6 % ( range 98.899.9<br />

%). In our experience, the technique could be performed without any<br />

problem in approximately an hour and a half, that is to say not<br />

significantly different from a usual 'whole prostate' brachytherapy. On<br />

our very preliminary results, early urinary toxicity seems to be inferior<br />

to what is usually observed after brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> the whole prostate,<br />

particularly for the focal 'apex only' cases. Incontinence score (ICS)<br />

was nil in all cases, as well as rectal toxicity. As for sexual toxicity,<br />

IIEF5 scores only showed very limited and transitory changes.<br />

: Focal treatment by brachytherapy is easily feasible with<br />

apparently little acute toxicity. Further investigation is needed to<br />

assess the results in terms <strong>of</strong> tumor control and toxicity.<br />

PO155<br />

DOSIMETRIC CONSTRAINT OPTIMIZATION IN INTRAOPERATIVE<br />

TREATMENT PLANNING OF PERMANENT SEED IMPLANTATION (PSI)<br />

K.U. Kasch 1 , P. Wust 2 , F. Kahmann 3 , T. Henkel 3<br />

1<br />

Beuth University for Applied Sciences Berlin,<br />

Mathematics/Physics/Chemistry, Berlin, Germany<br />

2<br />

Charité – University Medicine, CVK, Berlin, Germany<br />

3<br />

Outpatient Prostate <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Ullsteinhaus, Berlin, Germany<br />

: Today, PSI is an established treatment modality<br />

for (earlystage) prostate cancer. In comparison to alternatives the<br />

method <strong>of</strong>ten results in lower toxicity at equal tumor control. Current<br />

systems for the necessarily inverse treatment planning limit both type<br />

and number <strong>of</strong> available dosimetric constraints. Considering these<br />

limitations this study aims at a set <strong>of</strong> robust dosimetric constraints<br />

that translate into optimal clinical outcome.<br />

: The results presented here are based on the<br />

experience <strong>of</strong> about 2000 implantations performed by the authors <strong>of</strong><br />

this study. For a subgroup <strong>of</strong> about 400 patients both CTbased post<br />

implantation analyses were performed and standardized patient<br />

questionnaires were evaluated. Subsequently, first the<br />

correspondence <strong>of</strong> intraoperatively achieved dosimetric constraint<br />

values and those showing in the postimplant analysis was analyzed.<br />

Secondly, a possible correlation <strong>of</strong> dosimetric constraint values and<br />

clinical outcomes concerning acute and subacute toxicities was<br />

investigated. Finally, a set <strong>of</strong> robust dosimetric constraints was<br />

derived.<br />

This set was used by a supervised group <strong>of</strong> 20 medical physics master<br />

students to retrospectively (re)plan more than 300 patients (different<br />

from the above subgroup). The results were evaluated utilizing a<br />

quadratic score function for the dosimetric constraints as well as<br />

dosevolumehistograms (DVH) for prostate, urethra and rectum.<br />

Planning time and score function value as a function <strong>of</strong> the<br />

(increasing) number <strong>of</strong> patients planned by an individual student were<br />

interpreted in a learning curve.<br />

: The above derived set <strong>of</strong> dosimetric constraints results in a<br />

significant correlation between score function (physics) and DVH<br />

(clinical outcome). This, in conjunction with a steep learning curve in<br />

the planning process itself clearly indicates the clinical usefulness and<br />

robustness <strong>of</strong> the constraints found. The results can be used with<br />

commercially available treatment planning systems and do not depend<br />

on the seed activity.<br />

: Evaluation <strong>of</strong> postimplant analyses in conjunction with<br />

well designed patient questionnaires results in an optimized set <strong>of</strong><br />

dosimetric constraints. This, besides the growing experience with an<br />

increasing number <strong>of</strong> implantations, significantly contributes to the<br />

improvement <strong>of</strong> clinical outcome in PSI.<br />

PO156<br />

URINARY MORBIDITY RELATED TO PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY WITH<br />

OR WITHOUT EXTERNAL BEAM RADIATION THERAPY<br />

M. Ishida 1 , K. Kanao 1 , A. Sugawara 2 , R. Ohara 1 , S. Kashiyama 3 , M.<br />

Katayama 3 , N. Tsukamoto 3 , Y. Nakajima 1<br />

1 Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hosipital, Urology, Yokohama, Japan<br />

2 Keio University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Radiology, Tokyo, Japan<br />

3 Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hosipital, Radiology, Yokohama, Japan<br />

: A combination <strong>of</strong> permanent seed implantation<br />

brachytherapy (BT) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the treatment options for localized prostate cancer with<br />

intermediate or high risk. As for the difference <strong>of</strong> radiation field and<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 65<br />

radiation dose between the cases treated with BT alone or BT<br />

combined with EBRT (BT + EBRT), the divergence <strong>of</strong> posttreatment<br />

urinary morbidity may be seen. This study is to clarify the difference<br />

<strong>of</strong> urinary morbidity in the cases treated with BT alone or BT + EBRT.<br />

: Seventyseven histologically confirmed<br />

prostate adenocarcinoma patients underwent iodine<strong>12</strong>5 seed BT in<br />

our institute between October 2009 and June 2011. Among those<br />

patients, <strong>10</strong> with incomplete data were excluded from this study. The<br />

median age was 72, ranged from 45 to 81. Of those 67 patients<br />

included in this study, 43 (64.2%) were treated with BT alone with<br />

prescription dose <strong>of</strong> 160 Gy and the other 24, who were evaluated as<br />

intermediate or high risk under D’Amico classification, were treated<br />

with 1<strong>10</strong> Gy <strong>of</strong> BT followed by 45 Gy (1.8 Gy x 25) <strong>of</strong> EBRT.<br />

International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was obtained from those<br />

67 patients before BT (baseline) and 3 months (3M) after BT or BT +<br />

EBRT to evaluate voiding condition. To characterize urinary morbidity<br />

related to BT, changes <strong>of</strong> the scores from the baseline and the<br />

difference <strong>of</strong> the scores between two treatment groups were<br />

statistically analyzed with MannWhitney Utest.<br />

: Prostate volume was same in both treatment groups (BT<br />

alone: 26.7 ± 6.5 cc, BT+EBRT: 25.2 ± 11.8 cc, p = 0.16). There was<br />

no significant difference in total Biochemical Effective Dose (BED)<br />

between two groups, but BED <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy was higher in BT alone<br />

group (BT alone: 216.2 ± 25.1 Gy, BT+EBRT: 137.4 ± 17.7 Gy, p <<br />

0.01). There were no significant differences in total IPSS and<br />

obstructive urinary symptom score between the two treatment groups<br />

at baseline, however, irritative urinary symptom score was higher in<br />

BT+EBRT group (BT alone: 4.8 ± 2.8, BT+EBRT: 6.3 ± 3.2, p < 0.05).<br />

The changes <strong>of</strong> total IPSS from baseline revealed difference between<br />

the two treatment groups (BT alone: 8.7 ± 6.4, BT+EBRT: 0.6 ± 5.3, p<br />

< 0.01) showing that BT+EBRT had better voiding condition. The<br />

changes <strong>of</strong> obstructive urinary symptom score between the two<br />

treatment groups showed significant difference (BT alone: 5.6 ± 3.9,<br />

BT+EBRT 0.2 ± 3.3, p < 0.01). There was a significant difference<br />

between the two treatment groups on the changes <strong>of</strong> irritative urinary<br />

symptom score (BT alone: 3.0 ± 3.2, BT+EBRT 0.8 ± 2.8, p < 0.01).<br />

Urinary retention was not observed in both treatment groups.<br />

: According to the results <strong>of</strong> this study, urinary morbidity<br />

during the first 3 months after BT was lower in cases treated with BT<br />

combined with EBRT compared with cases treated with BT alone. It<br />

suggests that urinary morbidity is rather related to the radiation dose<br />

<strong>of</strong> implanted seeds than total BED.<br />

PO157<br />

RECTAL BALLOONS AND THE RISK OF SECONDARY RECTAL CANCER<br />

AFTER COMBINED MODALITY PROSTATE RADIATION<br />

R.J. Burri 1 , J. Ng 2 , D.P. Horowitz 2 , J.A. Cesaretti 3 , M. Terk 4 , J. Kao 5 ,<br />

T. Stephens 5 , K.S.C. Chao 2 , D.J. Brenner 6 , I. Shuryak 6<br />

1<br />

Tampa Bay Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, Sun City Center FL,<br />

USA<br />

2<br />

Columbia University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, New York<br />

NY, USA<br />

3<br />

Tampa Bay Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, Tampa FL, USA<br />

4<br />

Florida Radiation Oncology Group, Radiation Oncology, Jacksonville<br />

FL, USA<br />

5<br />

Tampa Bay Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, Brandon FL, USA<br />

6<br />

Columbia University Medical Center, Center for Radiological<br />

Research, New York NY, USA<br />

: An increased risk <strong>of</strong> secondary rectal malignancy<br />

is an established problem following definitive external beam radiation<br />

therapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer. Many highrisk, and some<br />

intermediaterisk, patients are currently treated with combined<br />

brachytherapy and EBRT, usually with an intensitymodulated<br />

radiation therapy (IMRT) plan to 45 Gy. In this study, a biologically<br />

based carcinogenesis model was used to quantitate and compare the<br />

predicted risk <strong>of</strong> secondary rectal cancer in men treated with or<br />

without a rectal balloon in place during the IMRT portion <strong>of</strong> combined<br />

modality therapy.<br />

: Treatment plans were developed for ten<br />

clinically localized prostate cancer patients using CT scans obtained<br />

both with and without a rectal balloon in place. Target volumes<br />

(prostate and proximal 1.5 cm <strong>of</strong> seminal vesicles) and normal<br />

structures were contoured, and dosevolume histograms (DVHs) for<br />

these <strong>org</strong>ans were determined with a planned IMRT dose <strong>of</strong> 45 Gy. A<br />

biologicallybased mathematical model <strong>of</strong> spontaneous and radiation<br />

induced carcinogenesis was used to determine the excess absolute risk<br />

<strong>of</strong> secondary rectal malignancies both with and without the rectal<br />

balloon in place. These risks were then compared to one another and<br />

to the baseline population.<br />

: Treatment with a rectal balloon in place resulted in a<br />

significantly lower mean rectal wall dose in all patients compared<br />

with treatment without a rectal balloon. The average mean rectal<br />

wall dose with a rectal balloon in place was 17.2 Gy versus 20.7 Gy<br />

without the rectal balloon (p=0.001). A significantly higher risk <strong>of</strong><br />

secondary rectal cancers was predicted for patients treated without<br />

rectal balloons when compared with patients treated with balloons in<br />

place (p=0.001, relative risk 1.22; 95% confidence interval 1.<strong>10</strong>1.34).<br />

: For prostate cancer patients treated with combined<br />

brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy, the use <strong>of</strong> a<br />

rectal balloon during the IMRT portion <strong>of</strong> treatment is associated with<br />

a significant reduction in the predicted risk <strong>of</strong> secondary rectal<br />

malignancy.<br />

PO158<br />

PHASE II TRIAL OF HIGHDOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY AND EXTERNAL<br />

RADIATION FOR INTERMEDIATERISK PROSTATE CANCER<br />

I. Tsukiyama 1 , R. Kobayashi 1 , J. Hiratsuka 2 , S. Kariya 3 , S. Uehara 4 , T.<br />

Dokiya 5 , H. Sekine 6 , T. Sato 7<br />

1<br />

Aidu Central Hospital, Radiology, Fukushima, Japan<br />

2<br />

Kawasaki Medical College, Radiation Oncology, Kurashiki, Japan<br />

3<br />

Kochi University, Diagnostic Radiology and Radiation Oncology,<br />

Kochi, Japan<br />

4<br />

Kyushu Cancer Center, Radiology, Fukuoka, Japan<br />

5<br />

Saitama Medical University, Radiation Oncology, Hidaka, Japan<br />

6<br />

Jikei University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Tokyo,<br />

Japan<br />

7<br />

Kitasato University, Urology, Kanagawa, Japan<br />

: To estimate the rate <strong>of</strong> early and late Grade 3 or<br />

greater genitourinary and gastrointestinal adverse <strong>events</strong> after<br />

treatment with external beam radiotherapy and prostate highdose<br />

rate (HDR) brachytherapy.<br />

: Patients with locally confined T2b,T2c or<br />

<strong>10</strong>ng/ml < PSA ≤ 20ng/ml or Gleason score=7 prostate cancer were<br />

eligible for the present study. All patients were treated 39 Gy in 13<br />

fractions using external beam radiotherapy and one HDR implant<br />

delivering 18 Gy in two fractions. All adverse event were graded<br />

according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event,<br />

version 3.0. Early adverse <strong>events</strong> were those occurring less than 9<br />

months and late adverse <strong>events</strong> were those occurring more than <strong>12</strong><br />

months from the start <strong>of</strong> the protocol treatment. Primary endpoint <strong>of</strong><br />

this study is rate <strong>of</strong> late Grade 3 or later adverse event. Secondary<br />

endpoints are rate <strong>of</strong> early Grade 3 adverse event and PSA failure<br />

rate.<br />

: A total <strong>of</strong> 92 patients from 5 institutions were enrolled in the<br />

present study. Of the 92 patients, 84 were eligible. Each rate <strong>of</strong> early<br />

adverse <strong>events</strong> <strong>of</strong> Grade 1 after three, six and nine months from the<br />

irradiation was 63%, 70% and 37% respectively, and that <strong>of</strong> Grade 2<br />

was 9%, 5%, and 3% respectively. Each rate <strong>of</strong> late adverse <strong>events</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Grade 1 after <strong>12</strong>, 18 and 24 months from the irradiation was 28%, 73%<br />

and 0% respectively, and that <strong>of</strong> Grade 2 was 4%, 0%, and 0%<br />

respectively. No adverse <strong>events</strong> <strong>of</strong> Grade 3 or greater were observed.<br />

Among 84 cases, only one patient caused PSA failure. The patient was<br />

treated with endocrine therapy.<br />

: As a result <strong>of</strong> highdose rate brachytherapy combined<br />

with external irradiation for intermediaterisk prostatic cancer, early<br />

and late adverse <strong>events</strong> <strong>of</strong> Grade 3 or greater did not occur, and only<br />

one patient had biochemical failure among the 84 patient. The<br />

technique and doses used in the present study resulted in acceptable<br />

level <strong>of</strong> adverse <strong>events</strong>.<br />

PO159<br />

LONG TERM TOXICITY FOLLOWING CS131 PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

R.P. Smith 1 , S. Beriwal 1 , R.M. Benoit 2<br />

1<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh, Radiation Oncology, Pittsburgh, USA<br />

2<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh, Urology, Pittsburgh, USA


S66 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

: Cesium131 is a newer radioisotope now being<br />

used in prostate brachytherapy (PB). We have noted a median<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> acute symptoms <strong>of</strong> 36 months following PB with Cs131.<br />

There is however, no data on long term urinary or bowel toxicity with<br />

this isotope, which this study addresses.<br />

: Patients undergoing PB with Cesium131 at<br />

our institution were asked to complete the Expanded Prostate Cancer<br />

Index Composite (EPIC) and IPSS survey preoperatively and at 2<br />

weeks, 1, 3, 6, 9 and <strong>12</strong> months and every 6 months thereafter<br />

following the implant. This report is based on the first <strong>10</strong>0 patients<br />

with at least 3 years <strong>of</strong> follow up, so that long term toxicity can be<br />

described. Scores in the EPICs range from 0 to <strong>10</strong>0, with higher scores<br />

corresponding to improved quality <strong>of</strong> life. A difference <strong>of</strong> > <strong>10</strong> points<br />

is noted to be a significant difference. The IPSS obviously indicates<br />

relative urinary morbidity while the EPIC notes morbidity in the<br />

following subscales: Urinary summary, urinary function, urinary<br />

bother, urinary incontinence, urinary irritative/obstructive, bowel<br />

summary, bowel function, and bowel bother.<br />

: There was no difference when comparing prebrachytherapy<br />

function to function at the 3 year mark in any <strong>of</strong> the EPIC subscales or<br />

in the IPSS score, indicating that PB with Cs131 carries little to no<br />

risk <strong>of</strong> long term morbidity to patients as a whole. In every subscale<br />

studied, however, there were patients who did not return to baseline.<br />

The median number who did not return to baseline in the different<br />

subscales studied was 21 (hence 21%). This was balanced by a number<br />

<strong>of</strong> patients who actually had an improvement in their function, with a<br />

median number improved in the different subscales being 19 patients<br />

(19%). Predictors <strong>of</strong> longterm toxicity were studied, including<br />

prostate volume, # seeds, seed activity, D90, V<strong>10</strong>0, V150, V200, V150<br />

urethra, V<strong>10</strong>0 urethra, Bladder neck D max, R<strong>10</strong>0, type <strong>of</strong> therapy,<br />

+/ ADT, the use preoperative alpha blockers, preoperative EPIC<br />

scores, age, and the need for a postoperative catheter. The only<br />

consistent predictor <strong>of</strong> worsening function at the 3 year mark was a<br />

better prebrachytherapy EPIC score.<br />

: Most patients undergoing PB with Cs131 have no urinary<br />

or bowel toxicity at the three year postbrachytherapy mark. Those<br />

that do have a worsening in function are balanced by those who<br />

actually have an improvement in function after PB with Cs131. The<br />

only consistent predictor for selfreported 3 year toxicity is better<br />

prebrachytherapy urinary and bowel function.<br />

PO160<br />

DAILY NEEDLE APPLICATOR DISPLACEMENT DURING HIGHDOSERATE<br />

PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY USING DAILY CT EXAMINATIONS<br />

T. Takenaka 1 , K. Yoshida 2 , M. Ueda 1 , H. Yamazaki 3 , S. Miyake 1 , E.<br />

Tanaka 4 , M. Yoshida 4 , Y. Yoshimura 1 , T. Oka 5 , K. Honda 1<br />

1<br />

Osaka national hospital, Radiology, Osaka, Japan<br />

2<br />

Osaka national hospital, Radiation Oncology and Institute for Clinical<br />

Research, Osaka, Japan<br />

3<br />

Kyoto prefectural university <strong>of</strong> medicine, Radiology, Kyoto, Japan<br />

4<br />

Osaka national hospital, Radiation Oncology, Osaka, Japan<br />

5<br />

Osaka national hospital, Urology, Osaka, Japan<br />

: To improve treatment conformity for prostate<br />

cancer, we investigated daily applicator displacement during high<br />

doserate interstitial brachytherapy (HDRISBT).<br />

: Between <strong>May</strong> 2007 and March 2009, 35<br />

patients at the National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital<br />

were treated with HDRISBT as monotherapy using our ambulatory<br />

technique. All patients received a treatment dosage <strong>of</strong> 49 Gy in 7<br />

fractions over 4 days. For dose administration, we examined 440<br />

flexible applicators (1320 points) using our unique ambulatory implant<br />

technique. Using CT images with a 3mm slice thickness, we<br />

calculated the relative coordinates <strong>of</strong> the titanium markers and the<br />

tips <strong>of</strong> the applicators. We calculated the distance between the<br />

center <strong>of</strong> gravity <strong>of</strong> the markers and the tips <strong>of</strong> the catheters, and<br />

compared the distances measured on the day <strong>of</strong> implantation and the<br />

second (21 hours), third (45 hours), and fourth (69 hours) treatment<br />

days.<br />

: The mean displacement distance for all applicators was 4.4 ±<br />

3.4 mm, 4.8 ± 4.1 mm, and 6.2 ± 4.5 mm at 21, 45, and 69 hours after<br />

initial planning CT. We used a 15mm margin for needle displacement<br />

and only 5 points (0.4%) <strong>of</strong> 3 patients (9%) exceeded this range.<br />

Almost patients (86%) showed the largest displacement within the first<br />

21 hours. The relative doses that covered <strong>10</strong>0% <strong>of</strong> CTV (D<strong>10</strong>0(CTV))<br />

values compared with the initial treatment plan were reduced to<br />

0.96±0.07, 0.95±0.08 and 0.92±0.1 at 21, 45 and 69 hours. However,<br />

the relative D90(CTV) values kept acceptable levels (1.01±0.02,<br />

1.01±0.03 and 0.96±0.05).<br />

: Cranial margin <strong>of</strong> 15 mm seems to be effective to keep<br />

D90(CTV) level if we do not do corrective action for 4 days <strong>of</strong><br />

implantation. However, corrective action should be performed to<br />

keep D<strong>10</strong>0(CTV) level and to reduce cranial margin and bladder neck<br />

complication.<br />

PO161<br />

LDR PROSTATE DOSIMETRY AND DOCUMENTATION FOCUS STUDY<br />

E. Cirino 1 , I. Iftimia 1 , L. Xiong 1 , H. Mower 1 , A. Mahadevan 1 , T. Lo 1<br />

1 Lahey Clinic, Radiation Oncology, Burlington, USA<br />

: This work is a retrospective review <strong>of</strong> twenty five<br />

low dose rate prostate (I<strong>12</strong>5 seed) treatment plans. The objective is<br />

to evaluate our criteria for determination <strong>of</strong> plan quality relative to<br />

current standards and to review our compliance with the definition <strong>of</strong><br />

medical <strong>events</strong> for brachytherapy.<br />

: Several references were reviewed to<br />

establish planning objectives (prostate and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk) for both<br />

intraoperative and one month postimplant plans. Our Radiation<br />

Oncologists reviewed a summary <strong>of</strong> these guidelines and in<br />

consideration <strong>of</strong> their historic practice and outcomes established<br />

updated criteria for our clinic. The new DVH criteria were used for<br />

the retrospective review.<br />

In a recent publication, an ASTRO working group recommended that<br />

the definition <strong>of</strong> a medical event for prostate permanent<br />

brachytherapy should be based on the implanted source strength and<br />

not dose. The recommendation was reviewed by our Radiation<br />

Oncologists then compared with local regulatory guidelines. It was<br />

agreed that this definition could be adopted in our clinic. The twenty<br />

five cases were reviewed to determine written directive compliance<br />

based on this definition.<br />

: Twenty four <strong>of</strong> the twenty five cases reviewed met the<br />

revised DVH guidelines. One <strong>of</strong> the twenty five cases had a one month<br />

postimplant prostate D90 less than 80%. This particular case showed<br />

an enlarged prostate volume and prompted further evaluation. The<br />

evaluation resulted in a revised process that triggers the physician to<br />

review the case in detail and document the review if a postoperative<br />

prostate D90 is less than 80% <strong>of</strong> the written directive target dose. The<br />

planning printouts are now customized to include the established<br />

criteria.<br />

A medical event is now based on greater than 20% <strong>of</strong> the source<br />

strength prescribed in the written directive being implanted outside<br />

the planning target volume in the one month postimplant evaluation.<br />

All <strong>of</strong> the study cases reviewed were compliant with the ASTRO<br />

recommended definition for written directive. The one month<br />

postimplant planning document was edited to reflect evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

the source strength and therefore written directive compliance.<br />

: Updated planning DVH objectives were established<br />

based on literature review, used for the retrospective study, and<br />

implemented in our practice. The study showed good agreement with<br />

the updated objective for both the intraoperative plans and the one<br />

month postimplant plans.<br />

The ASTRO working group definition <strong>of</strong> a medical event based on<br />

verification <strong>of</strong> implanted source strength rather than dose was used<br />

for the retrospective review and adopted for future cases. Based on<br />

this definition all plans were in compliance.<br />

Future work will include a more detailed evaluation <strong>of</strong> the one month<br />

postimplant cases where prostate D90 is less than 80% to determine<br />

any predictors that could prompt modification during the<br />

intraoperative planning.<br />

PO162<br />

IMPACT OF DOSE ON INTERMEDIATERISK PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS<br />

TREATED WITH BRACHYTHERAPY ALONE OR BOOST<br />

A. Yorozu 1 , K. Toya 1 , K. Yoshida 1 , N. Koike 1 , A. Takahashi 1 , S. Saito 2 ,<br />

T. Nishiyama 2 , Y. Yagi 2 , R. Namidome 2 , A. Ashikari 2<br />

1<br />

Tokyo Medical Centre NHO, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Tokyo, Japan<br />

2<br />

Tokyo Medical Centre NHO, Department <strong>of</strong> Urology, Tokyo, Japan<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 67<br />

: To assess the impact <strong>of</strong> radiation dose on<br />

biochemical failure in intermediaterisk prostate cancer patients<br />

treated with brachtherapy (BT) alone or combined with external beam<br />

irradiation (EBRT).<br />

: From a prospectively collected database <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>12</strong>90 men treated at Tokyo Medical Center from 2003 to 2009 with I<br />

<strong>12</strong>5 BT for prostate cancer, 688 men with intermediaterisk patients<br />

with either one or more intermediaterisk features (PSA level <strong>10</strong>20<br />

ng/mL, Gleason score 7, or Stage T2b/2c) were identified who had a<br />

minimum followup <strong>of</strong> 24 months. Patients with lowtier <strong>of</strong><br />

intermediate risk (PSA < <strong>10</strong> ng/mL and Gleason score 3+4 with positive<br />

core rates less than 1/3 ) were treated with BT alone and the rest<br />

uppertier patients were treated with BT followed by EBRT. Gleason<br />

score was 7 in 76% <strong>of</strong> patients. PSA ranged from 1.4 to 20 ng/mL<br />

(median, 7.6 ng/mL). Seventy per cent <strong>of</strong> patients received<br />

neoadjuvant hormone therapy (median, 7 months) while 30 % <strong>of</strong><br />

patients did not. Biologically effective dose (BED) values were<br />

calculated to compare doses <strong>of</strong> treatment regimens. BED ranged from<br />

<strong>10</strong>5 to 250 Gy2 (median, 206 Gy2). Patient and treatmentrelated<br />

factors were analyzed with respect to freedom from biochemical<br />

failure (FFbF). The effects <strong>of</strong> multiple variables were tested by log<br />

rank and linear regression.<br />

: The median followup was 60 months (range, 24–<strong>10</strong>0 months).<br />

The overall FFbF using the ASTRO definition for all patients was 93 %<br />

at 5 years and 91 % at 7 years. Of the eight factors tested (age, T<br />

stage, PSA levels, Gleason score, positive core rate, use <strong>of</strong> hormone,<br />

use <strong>of</strong> EBRT, and BED), only BED (BED 180 Gy2) was<br />

found to be significant (p=0.003). To analyze the effect <strong>of</strong> increasing<br />

BED on FFbF, patients were devided in to three BED dose groups. The<br />

dose groups were 1802<strong>10</strong> Gy2 (n=368), and >2<strong>10</strong><br />

Gy2 (n=254). The 7year FFbF rate for BED groups was 81%, 91% and<br />

94%, respectively (p=0.0<strong>10</strong>). Cox regression revealed that Tstage<br />

(p=0.049), Gleason score (p=0.018) and BED (p=0.007) were significant<br />

predictors <strong>of</strong> FFbF when age, PSA, Tstage, Gleason score, positive<br />

core rate, hormone and BED were considered continuous variables.<br />

: Radiation dose is an important predictor <strong>of</strong> 5year FFbF<br />

in intermediaterisk prostate cancer. With the use <strong>of</strong> high BED<br />

radiotherapy setting, neoadjuvant hormone therapy did not have a<br />

significant impact on 5year FFbF rates. Individualized treatment<br />

using I<strong>12</strong>5 brachytherapy alone or boost should be a good option for<br />

intermediaterisk prostate cancer patients.<br />

PO163<br />

PSA RESPONSE TO TRIMODALITY PREDICTS BIOCHEMICAL<br />

PROGRESSION FREE SURVIVAL IN LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER<br />

M. Aoki 1 , K. Miki 2 , Y. Yamamoto 2 , M. Kido 2 , S. Takaki 1 , M. Kobayashi 1 ,<br />

C. Kanehira 1 , S. Egawa 2<br />

1<br />

Jikei University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology,<br />

Minatoku, Japan<br />

2<br />

Jikei University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Urology, Minato<br />

ku, Japan<br />

: High dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined<br />

with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), neoadjuvant androgen<br />

suppression therapy (NAST) and adjuvant androgen suppression<br />

therapy (AAST) (Trimodality) have been used to treat localized high<br />

risk prostate cancer. To define prognostic factors <strong>of</strong> biochemical<br />

relapse free survival (bRFS), an analysis <strong>of</strong> patients treated with Tri<br />

modality were performed.<br />

: Between <strong>May</strong> 2005 and Oct. 2008, <strong>10</strong>9 high<br />

risk prostate cancer patients (D'Amico classification) were treated<br />

with NAST prior to HDR brachytherapy combined with<br />

hyp<strong>of</strong>ractionated EBRT. Among <strong>10</strong>8 patients, <strong>10</strong>7 patients (99%) had<br />

completed AAST for 24 months after whole radiotherapy. The median<br />

age was 69 years (range, 5982). The median initial PSA was 23.5<br />

ng/ml (range, 3.9365). The median Gleason score was 8 (GS<br />

6/7/8/9/<strong>10</strong> : 7/23/35/23/4). The median follow up was 52 months<br />

(range, 3674). The median NAST was 9 months (range,<strong>12</strong>9). The<br />

median AAST was 24 months (range, 324). 74 patients:HDR<br />

brachytherapy (PTV: 5Gy, 6Gy, 2fx/day) and hyp<strong>of</strong>ractionated EBRT<br />

(45Gy : 3Gy×15fx/3weeks). 35 patients:HDR brachytherapy (PTV: 9Gy,<br />

9Gy, 2fx/day) and hyp<strong>of</strong>ractionated EBRT (40Gy :<br />

2.5Gy×16fx/3weeks). Hyp<strong>of</strong>ractionated EBRT was performed 1weeks<br />

after HDR brachytherapy. 66 patients were given total androgen<br />

suppression and 16 patiennts were given LHRH only as NAST.<br />

: With a median follow up <strong>of</strong> 52 months, bRFS <strong>of</strong> all patients<br />

was 81%(70mons). bRFS <strong>of</strong> high dose arm and low dose arm were <strong>10</strong>0%<br />

(48 mon) and 79.5%(76mon) respectively(p=0.24). On multivariate<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> factors predicting bRFS, dose <strong>of</strong> HDR and PreHDR PSA level<br />

were significant respectively (p=0.0003, 0.005). However age, initial<br />

PSA, Gleason score, duration <strong>of</strong> NHT were not significant respectively<br />

(p=0.68, 0.065, 0.40, 0.62). Patients in the PreHDR PSA0.1 group (87.9% vs. 68.2%, p=0.014). On multivariate analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

factors predicting PreHDR PSA level, although the term <strong>of</strong> NAST was<br />

not significant (p=0.076), initial PSA tend to be significant (p=0.052).<br />

: For highrisk prostate cancer patients treated with Tri<br />

modality (NAST, HDR plus EBRT, AAST), Dose <strong>of</strong> HDR and PreHDR PSA<br />

were important prognostic factors (p=0.0003, 0.005 respectively).<br />

Patients in the PreHDR PSA0.1 group (p=0.014). A<br />

further study is needed to confirm the importance <strong>of</strong> PreHDR PSA in<br />

Trimodality treatment.<br />

PO164<br />

SEED MIGRATION IN PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY DEPENDS ON<br />

EXPERIENCE AND TECHNIQUE<br />

G. Delouya 1 , D. Taussky 1 , C. Moumdjian 1 , R. Larouche 1 , D. Béliveau<br />

Nadeau 1 , C. Boudreau 1 , Y. Hervieux 1 , D. Donath 1<br />

1 CHUM Hôpital NotreDame, Radiation Oncology, Montréal, Canada<br />

: To determine the rate <strong>of</strong> seed loss and pulmonary<br />

migration over time in permanent seed prostate brachytherapy (PB).<br />

: The first 495 patients treated at our<br />

department were analyzed. All patients were treated with loose<br />

I <strong>12</strong>5 seeds using an automated seed delivery system and realtime<br />

intraoperative planning. Pelvic fluoroscopic imaging was done 30 days<br />

following the implant. Patients were divided into five groups <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong>0<br />

patients each according to the order treated. The five groups were<br />

compared using Chisquare test and Oneway analysis <strong>of</strong> variance<br />

(ANOVA).<br />

: A total <strong>of</strong> 22.8% <strong>of</strong> patients lost at least one seed. The<br />

highest percentage <strong>of</strong> patients losing any number <strong>of</strong> seeds was in the<br />

first group <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong>0 patients. At least one seed was lost in 38% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

patients. This number decreased gradually and reached a rate as low<br />

as 9% in the last group <strong>of</strong> one hundred patients (patients 400 to 499).<br />

The mean total seed loss rate (number <strong>of</strong> seeds lost/number <strong>of</strong> seeds<br />

implanted) changed significantly over time (p


S68 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

: 15 patients with local recurrent prostate<br />

cancer after primary radiotherapy were treated with focal salvage I<br />

<strong>12</strong>5 brachytherapy. Location <strong>of</strong> recurrent tumor was defined on T2<br />

weighted MRI and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)MRI, in<br />

combination with systematic <strong>10</strong>core prostate biopsy. Goal was to<br />

deliver 145Gy to the gross tumor volume (GTV) while maintaining dose<br />

limitations for <strong>org</strong>ans at risk. Toxicity was scored by the Common<br />

Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE3.0). Quality <strong>of</strong> Life<br />

(QoL) was measured by SF36 Health Survey, European Organization <strong>of</strong><br />

Research and Treatment <strong>of</strong> Cancer (EORTC) C30+3 and PR25<br />

questionnaires. Feasibility was defined as treating >90% <strong>of</strong> patients<br />

within prescription limits and severe toxicity (>grade 3) in<br />

: In 13 patients >95% <strong>of</strong> the GTV was covered with the<br />

prescribed dose. Mean D90 was 198Gy (range 150330). In 14 patients<br />

rectum and bladder doses were within limits. The D2cc for bladder<br />

and rectum were respectively 42Gy (1969) and 63Gy (1896). For<br />

urethra, median D<strong>10</strong> was 133Gy (<strong>10</strong>0240). With a minimum followup<br />

<strong>of</strong> 6 months one patient suffered from grade 3 gastrointestinal (GI)<br />

and genitourinary (GU) toxicity. Grade 2 occurred in 4 (GU) and 0 (GI)<br />

patients. Erectile dysfunction at baseline and after 6 months was seen<br />

in 6 patients. Quality <strong>of</strong> life significantly decreased with regard to<br />

social and pain measures. In <strong>12</strong> patients PSA declined during follow<br />

up.<br />

:<br />

Focal therapy for prostate cancer recurrences seems feasible and<br />

toxicity and influence on quality <strong>of</strong> life are acceptable.<br />

PO166<br />

PERMANENT PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY IN JAPANESE PATIENTS WITH<br />

SMALL PROSTATE GLANDS<br />

K. Kobayashi 1 , K. Okihara 2 , K. Kamoi 2 , T. Iwata 2 , T. Tsubokura 1 , N.<br />

Aibe 1 , N. Kodani 1 , T. Miki 2 , H. Yamazaki 1<br />

1<br />

Kyoto Prefectural University <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology,<br />

Kyoto, Japan<br />

2<br />

Kyoto Prefectural University <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Urology,<br />

Kyoto, Japan<br />

: To investigate the dosimetric and treatment<br />

related morbidity for brachytherapy in Japanese patients with<br />

prostate glands < 20cm 3<br />

: From April 2005 to December 20<strong>10</strong>, a total <strong>of</strong><br />

300 patients were treated by brachytherapy without EBRT in our<br />

institute. About 50% <strong>of</strong> 300 (151) patients had small prostate < 20cm 3 .<br />

We compared the two groups, Small prostate < 20cm 3 dosimetric<br />

quality assesment we useds Day 30 CT with MRI. We compared the two<br />

groups, Small prostate 20 cm3<br />

(nS). The implant technique was Hybrid interactiverealtime with Mick<br />

Aplicator method. Prescription dose was 145Gy. For assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

prostate volulme, we performed transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), MRI<br />

(one day before procedure day, Day1 and Day30). Dosimetric quality<br />

assessment was Day 30CT with MRI. Dosimetric quality was reported in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> the following parameters: D90, V<strong>10</strong>0, V150, rectalV<strong>10</strong>0,<br />

urethralD90. For the evaluation <strong>of</strong> treatmentrelated morbidity, we<br />

used CTCAE ver.4.<br />

: DVH parameters (S vs. nS) were D90 (170.2 vs. 171.5 Gy),<br />

V<strong>10</strong>0 (97.6 vs. 97.4 %), V150 (54.5 vs. 53.7%), rectalV<strong>10</strong>0 (0.02 vs.<br />

0.08ml) and urethralD90 (166.3 vs. 161.7Gy). The median age were<br />

(68.5 vs. 70y.o.), follow up length were (42 vs. 39 months). All<br />

parameters showed no significant difference. There were no acute<br />

Grade 2 urinary retention in the S group, but there were 5 patients<br />

who experienced Grade 2 retention in nS group (p=0.02). Acute Grade<br />

2 micoic pain was one case in both groups. Grade 2 incontinence was<br />

one case in S group (No significant difference). Late Grade 3 urinary<br />

toxicity <strong>of</strong> retention which needed transurethral resection <strong>of</strong> the<br />

prostate (TURP) was one case in nS group, and grade 2 retention were<br />

2 case in nS group. Grade 2 hematuria was occurred one case in both<br />

groups. There were no grade 3 rectal complications. Only one case <strong>of</strong><br />

grade 2 rectal hemorrhage was occurred in both groups. PSA failure<br />

determined by nadir +2 (except PSA bounce) was occurred one case in<br />

S group.<br />

: Our results demonstrate that bracytherapy for Japanese<br />

small prostate volumes is also highly effective, excellent post<br />

dosimetry and acceptable treatmentrelated morbidity. Regarding<br />

acute urinary retention it is unlikely to cause adverse <strong>events</strong> in small<br />

prostates.<br />

PO167<br />

IMPACT OF EMBEDDED SEEDS ON DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS IN XRAY<br />

RADIOTHERAPY: A PHANTOM STUDY WITH MONTE CARLO CALCULATION<br />

K. Shiraishi 1 , A. Sakumi 1 , A. Haga 1 , T. Onoe 1 , K. Yamamoto 1 , K.<br />

Okuma 1 , K. Yoda 1 , K. Nakagawa 1<br />

1 University <strong>of</strong> Tokyo, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology, Tokyo, Japan<br />

: In the multidisciplinary therapy era for high risk<br />

prostate cancer, external beam radiation therapy is <strong>of</strong>ten combined<br />

with brachytherapy boost. We have investigated the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

implanted seeds on dose distributions in xray radiotherapy by way <strong>of</strong><br />

Monte Carlo calculation.<br />

: Iodine<strong>12</strong>5 seeds, OncoSeed (Oncura, USA),<br />

were implanted into a prostate training phantom for brachytherapy,<br />

Model 053 (CIRS, USA), and the phantom was positioned in water with<br />

an acrylic enclosure. A dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong>0 MU with a photon energy <strong>of</strong> 6 MV<br />

and a field size <strong>of</strong> 5 x 5 cm2 was unidirectionally delivered to the<br />

phantom and the projected image was acquired by a portal imager,<br />

iViewGT (Elekta, UK). A Monte Carlo based TPS, Monaco (Elekta, USA)<br />

was used to calculate the dose distributions inside the phantom with<br />

the identical radiation parameters. Another Monte Carlo code,<br />

EGSnrc, was also employed for comparison. Monaco was also used to<br />

calculate dose distributions when the same beam was delivered to the<br />

phantom from four directions <strong>of</strong> 0, 90, 180 and 270 degrees.<br />

:<br />

Figure 1(a) shows a projected image on the iViewGT panel, where<br />

seeds were clearly observed. Figure 1(b) shows dose perturbation<br />

caused by backscattering from each seed.<br />

Figure 1(c) shows another verification result done by the EGSnrc code<br />

under the same radiation parameters except for a field size <strong>of</strong> 3 x 3<br />

cm2 to reduce computation time. Again the dose fluctuation in space<br />

was clearly observed. Finally Figure 1(d) demonstrates that the above<br />

dose perturbation is not observed when multiple beams were<br />

delivered to the phantom including seeds. Good result was also<br />

obtained in dose verification<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 69<br />

:<br />

We have observed that seeds implanted in the phantom are<br />

acceptably visible in EPID and affect dose distributions in xray<br />

radiotherapy when a single beam is delivered. However, beams from<br />

multiple directions may cancel the dose perturbation by spatial<br />

averaging. These results encourage us to use seeds for tumor<br />

registration in 3D CRT, IMRT, and VMAT. Furthermore, especially in<br />

VMAT delivery after radioactive seed implantation, which has already<br />

been clinically employed as shown in Figure 2, there may be little<br />

deleterious effect by the seeds on dosimetric evaluation.<br />

PO168<br />

VALIDITY OF INTRAOPERATIVE INTERACTIVE PLANNING TECHNIQUE<br />

BASED ON ANATOMIC DISTRIBUTION OF PROSTATE CANCER<br />

O. Keisei 1 , N. Kohno 2 , Y. Okinaka 1 , Y. Okada 1 , K. Murata 2<br />

1<br />

Shiga University <strong>of</strong> Medical Science, Department <strong>of</strong> Urology, Otsu<br />

shi, Japan<br />

2<br />

Shiga University <strong>of</strong> Medical Science, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology, Otsu<br />

shi, Japan<br />

: Modern prostate brachytherapy is a highly<br />

effective treatment for localized prostate cancer. To obtain a high<br />

cure rate by prostate brachytherapy, it is important to provide a<br />

sufficient radiation dose everywhere cancer cells exist. There have<br />

been reports <strong>of</strong> lower radiation dose on anterior base. This has been<br />

justified because <strong>of</strong> the rare location <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer at the<br />

anterior base. We reviewed whole mounted prostatectomy specimens<br />

in our series to see the anatomic distribution <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer.<br />

Based on these results, we evaluated the validity <strong>of</strong> our current<br />

interactive intraoperative technique.<br />

: A total <strong>of</strong> 69 men with clinically localized<br />

prostate cancer were treated with radical prostatectomy at Shiga<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Medical Science between 2008 and 2011. Whole mounted<br />

prostatectomy specimens were analyzed for anatomic distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

prostate cancer. Extraprostatic extensions (EPE) and resection<br />

margins (RM) were studied, and their locations were classified into<br />

four quadrants [anteriorsuperior quadrant (ASQ), posteriorsuperior<br />

quadrant (PSQ), anteriorinferior quadrant (AIQ), posteriorinferior<br />

quadrant (PIQ)], and apex. Based on the results <strong>of</strong> the anatomical<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer, we evaluated our current interactive<br />

intraoperative technique by investigating postimplant dosimetry for<br />

four different regions <strong>of</strong> the prostate gland.<br />

: Among the 69 prostatectomy cases, EPE and/or RM were<br />

present in 33 cases (47.8%). The locations <strong>of</strong> EPE and/or RM were<br />

distributed with 11 cases (33.3%) in ASQ, <strong>12</strong> cases (36.3%) in AIQ, one<br />

case (3.0%) in PSQ, six cases (18.1%) in PIQ and three cases (9.0%) in<br />

apex. The postimplantation dose obtained by our current interactive<br />

intraoperative technique was: The mean V<strong>10</strong>0±95% confidence<br />

interval for the whole prostate, 97.5±0.5%; for ASQ, 96.2±1.3%; for<br />

PSQ, 97.6±0.7%; for AIQ, 99.0±0.7%; for PIQ, 97.7±0.9%. The mean<br />

D90±95% confidence interval for [or] the whole prostate, 180.4±4.4Gy;<br />

for ASQ, 175.0±6.9Gy; for PSQ, 181.2±6.6Gy; for AIQ, 202.2±7.6Gy; for<br />

PIQ, 181.2±5.5Gy.<br />

: The present data demonstrate the importance <strong>of</strong><br />

including treatment <strong>of</strong> the anterior portions <strong>of</strong> the prostate, not only<br />

AIQ, but also ASQ. Our current interactive intraoperative technique<br />

allows us to provide high quality implants covering the entire prostate<br />

with minimal morbidity.<br />

PO169<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY FOR YOUNG PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS. WHAT IS<br />

DIFFERENT FROM ELDER PATIENTS?<br />

Y. Yagi 1 , A. Ashikari 1 , R. Namitome 1 , T. Nishiyama 1 , K. Toya 2 , A.<br />

Yorozu 2 , S. Saito 1<br />

1<br />

National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Urology,<br />

Tokyo, Japan<br />

2<br />

National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Radioncology,<br />

Tokyo, Japan<br />

: This study is to evaluate clinical outcomes <strong>of</strong><br />

brachytherapy (BT) with I<strong>12</strong>5 seed implantation in young prostate<br />

cancer patients.<br />

: Between July 2005 and December 2008, 771<br />

patients underwent BT for cT13N0M0 prostate cancer at our<br />

institution. Of the total number <strong>of</strong> patients, 86 (11.2%) were aged 60 years old (elder<br />

group). Kaplan Meier analysis was performed to evaluate the<br />

biochemical progressionfree survival rate (BPFS), clinical progression<br />

free survival rate (CPFS) and overall survival rate (OS). The Phoenix<br />

definition was used to determine biochemical failure. Prostate<br />

specific antigen (PSA) bounce was defined as a rise <strong>of</strong> at least 0.4<br />

ng/ml with a spontaneous return to the prebounce level or lower.<br />

Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) was used to<br />

investigate healthrelated quality <strong>of</strong> life (HRQOL).<br />

:<br />

The followup period was 6.4 to 75.1 (median 51.1) months. The BPFS<br />

rate in the young and elder groups at 5year was 82.1% and 92.5%,<br />

respectively (P = 0.006). The CPFS rate in the young and elder groups<br />

at 5year was 97.5% and 94.7%, respectively (P = 0.450). Of the 86<br />

patients in the young group, 13 patients matched the Phoenix<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> biochemical failure, however, only 2 patients showed<br />

clinical progression and the others were defined as PSA bounce. The<br />

PSA bounce rate in the young and elder groups at 3year was 46.7%<br />

and 26.1%, respectively (P = 0.027). The OS rate in the young and<br />

elder groups at 5year was <strong>10</strong>0% and 95.9%, respectively (P = 0.082).<br />

No one died <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer in young group and only one died elder<br />

group. HRQOL analysis with EPIC showed that urinary incontinence<br />

and sexual function were better in the young group than those in the<br />

elder group. Bowel and hormonal function were similar in both<br />

groups. A total <strong>of</strong> 52 patients in the elder group suffered from second<br />

primary cancer (SPC) after BT, but no SPC was seen in the young<br />

group. Nine out <strong>of</strong> 52 patients in the elder group were bladder or<br />

rectal cancer, which arose between 33 to 65 months after BT.<br />

: BT was equally effective in young prostate cancer<br />

patients under age <strong>of</strong> 60, but PSA bounce was more <strong>of</strong>ten observed in<br />

the young group. EPIC analysis showed that the young group had


S70 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

better outcomes <strong>of</strong> HRQOL. Concerning the incidence <strong>of</strong> SPC after BT,<br />

longer followup is necessary to reach the conclusion.<br />

PO170<br />

EXCLUSIVE IODINE <strong>12</strong>5 PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY. EXPERIENCE OF<br />

INSTITUT BERGONIÈ<br />

L. Thomas 1 , A. Chemin 1 , S. Belhomme 1 , O. Lasbareilles 1 , J.<br />

Mendiboure 2 , N. Houédé 3 , E. Descat 4 , D. Monnin 5 , P. Richaud 1<br />

1<br />

Institut Bergonié, Radiation Oncology, Bordeaux, France<br />

2<br />

Institut Bergonié, Biostatistics, Bordeaux, France<br />

3<br />

Institut Bergonié, Medical Oncology, Bordeaux, France<br />

4<br />

Institut Bergonié, Radiology, Bordeaux, France<br />

5<br />

Institut Bergonié, Anesthesiology, Bordeaux, France<br />

: Retrospective analysis <strong>of</strong> pts with prostate cancer<br />

treated with Iodine permanent implant. To describe biochemical<br />

failure free survival (BFFS), genitourinary toxicity and erectile<br />

dysfunction.<br />

: 302 patients (pts) with prostate cancer were<br />

treated at Institut Bergonié with permanent Iodine implant between<br />

June 2002 and December 2009. Patients were selected for<br />

brachytherapy according to usual criterias admitted (international and<br />

national recommendations). At the beginning, strand I<strong>12</strong>5 seeds<br />

'ONCURA' after intraoperative dosimetry with spot Nucletron were<br />

inserted manually with 'Utrecht' wings for 65 pts. From <strong>May</strong> 2005, a<br />

seed projector after 3D dosimetry peroperative treatment planning<br />

'First technique' was used for 237 pts. Inverse planning optimized<br />

dosimetry was incorporated (IPSA) since September 2006. Prescribed<br />

dose at the planning target volume (prostate) was 145 Gy. Every<br />

patient had a clinical and biochemical followup. Genitourinary and<br />

rectal toxicity were classified according to CTCAE V3 (Common<br />

Toxicities Criteria for Adverse Events) and using IPSS score<br />

(International Prostate Symptoms Score).<br />

: Mean age <strong>of</strong> pts was 64.6 years and mean pretreatment PSA<br />

was 6.97 ng/ml; 79.8% <strong>of</strong> pts (241 pts) were low risk prostate cancer,<br />

19.5% (59 pts) were intermediate risk and 2 pts were high risk; 83.2%<br />

(251 pts) were T1c, 15.6% (47 pts) T2a. Gleason score was less or<br />

equal to 6 in 88.8% (268 pts) and Gleason score was 7 (3+4) in only<br />

<strong>10</strong>.9% (33 pts). Mean IPSS score was 3.21 (014) and only <strong>12</strong> pts (4%)<br />

had an IPSS score > <strong>10</strong> < 15. Before treatment with brachytherapy,<br />

hormone deprivation was administered during a mean <strong>of</strong> 4 months for<br />

cytoreduction in 68 pts (22.5%). Dosimetric quality criterias fullfilled<br />

recommendations and intraoperative D90 Prostate was 180 Gy (mean<br />

and median) and D90 Prostate on CT scan at 30 days was respectively<br />

for mean and median dose 153.56 Gy and 156 Gy. Retention rate was<br />

6% (18 pts) during the period <strong>of</strong> the study and is evaluated to 2% per<br />

year since 2007. Overall urinary toxicity ³ G3 was reported in 8.6% (26<br />

pts), with only 1.6% G3 (4 pts) at <strong>12</strong> months after brachytherapy and<br />

1% G3 (2 pts) at 24 months after brachytherapy. Since 2007, no<br />

urinary toxicity G3 is reported. Incontinence rate was 0.5% at 24<br />

months (1 pt) after treatment. IPSS score at 6 months after treatment<br />

was > <strong>10</strong> in 22.5% (46 pts). Rectal toxicity G2 and G3 was recorded in<br />

overall 2.4% (7 pts). At 2 years after treatment, erectile dysfunction<br />

was present in 27.6% (43 pts). Followup is 45 months (IC 95%), 95.3%<br />

(286 pts) are alive without disease, 0.7% (2 pts) are dead cancer<br />

prostate related, 1.3% (4 pts) have presented distant metastasis and<br />

2.3% (7 pts) have presented a local relapse which has been salvaged<br />

for 5 pts by cœlioscopy robotic prostatectomy. Biochemical failure<br />

free survival at 36 and 48 months were respectively 95.8% and 94.7%<br />

according to Phoenix definition.<br />

: Iodine <strong>12</strong>5 monotherapy yields excellent results for pts<br />

with prostate cancer carefully and highly selected with acceptable<br />

urinary toxicity and relatively low erectile dysfunction.<br />

PO171<br />

DNA PLOIDY BASED ON ARCHIVED BIOPSY MATERIAL MAY CORRELATE<br />

WITH PSA RECURRENCE AFTER PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

M. Keyes 1 , M. MacAulay 2 , M. Hayes 3 , J. Korbelik 2 , D. Garner 2 , J.W.<br />

Morris 1 , B. Palcic 2<br />

1<br />

B.C. Cancer Agency Vancouver Centre, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />

Oncology, Vancouver BC, Canada<br />

2<br />

B.C. Cancer Agency Vancouver Centre, Department <strong>of</strong> Cancer<br />

Imaging, Vancouver BC, Canada<br />

3<br />

B.C. Cancer Agency Vancouver Centre, Department <strong>of</strong> Pathology,<br />

Vancouver BC, Canada<br />

: It has been postulated that DNA ploidy status as<br />

measured by Diagnostic DNA Image Cytometry (DNAICM) can predict<br />

the therapeutic outcome in prostate cancer. The objective <strong>of</strong> this<br />

study was to further explore whether DNA ploidy <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer<br />

cells can distinguish between patients with PSA failures and non<br />

failures treated with prostate <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>.<br />

: <strong>10</strong>06 uniformly selected low and intermediate<br />

risk patients received prostate brachytherapy between 20/7/98 to<br />

23/<strong>10</strong>/03 at the BCCA. Median followup is 73 months, and PSA<br />

recurrence at 7 years is 5.6%. Neither <strong>of</strong> the recognized dosimetry<br />

quality assurance factors (V<strong>10</strong>0 or D90) were able to distinguish<br />

between PSA failures and non failures. 47 patients with PSA failure<br />

were identified from this cohort and 47 controls matched using age,<br />

iPSA, clinical stage Gleason Score and use <strong>of</strong> hormone therapy and<br />

length <strong>of</strong> follow up. Out <strong>of</strong> the 90 specimens received from pathology<br />

departments across BC, 79 were successfully processed. 27 controls<br />

and 20 failures contained more than <strong>10</strong>0 tumor cells, and these were<br />

used for the final analysis. Tumor location in the tissue blocks was<br />

marked by a pathologist, the tissue prepared as a cell monolayer, and<br />

scanned.<br />

DNA content <strong>of</strong> each individual cell was determined by measuring<br />

their integrated optical densities (IOD). The nuclei for each case were<br />

separated into 13 separate previously validated ploidy groups (P1P13)<br />

based on their DNA content. The percentage <strong>of</strong> cells in each group<br />

was used to classify the samples. Linear discriminate function analysis<br />

was used for the statistical analysis.<br />

: Age, iPSA, clinical stage Gleason Score and use <strong>of</strong> hormone<br />

therapy and length <strong>of</strong> follow up between failures and non failures<br />

were well matched (Ttest, all p values NS). Non failure group<br />

however, had larger proportion <strong>of</strong> cores involved with cancer (Ttest<br />

p=0.0021). Using a single feature P2 (frequency <strong>of</strong> cells with DNA<br />

Index <strong>of</strong> 0.95 to 1.0) we could correctly recognise 70% <strong>of</strong> controls and<br />

80% <strong>of</strong> failures (MannWhitney U test p=0.0022).<br />

: DNA ploidy can correctly classify the majority <strong>of</strong> failures<br />

and nonfailures in this study. This suggests the possibility <strong>of</strong> failure<br />

patients likely having a different amount <strong>of</strong> genomic alterations, and<br />

potentially a more aggressive disease. The question arises whether<br />

knowing this information before brachytherapy, may call for more<br />

aggressive treatment upfront. DNA ploidy may be useful for<br />

separating patients for active surveillance from those warranting<br />

active management. A larger sample <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer cohort<br />

patients and validation on an external cohort will be necessary to<br />

further confirm our hypothesis.<br />

PO172<br />

CURRENT RISK CLASSIFICATION FOR PROSTATE CANCER DOES NOT<br />

ACCURATELY PREDICT SURVIVAL AFTER I<strong>12</strong>5 BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

L. Kerkmeijer 1 , E. Monninkh<strong>of</strong> 2 , M. Van Vulpen 1<br />

1<br />

U.M.C. Utrecht, Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />

2<br />

U.M.C. Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care,<br />

Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />

: Prediction <strong>of</strong> outcome in prostate cancer patients<br />

is usually based on risk classification systems including a low, medium<br />

and high risk category based on Tstage, PSA at diagnosis and Gleason<br />

score. The available risk classification systems are subject <strong>of</strong><br />

discussion, since outcome is based on biochemical recurrence rather<br />

than survival. Furthermore, these systems do not take into account<br />

the individual contribution <strong>of</strong> each clinical risk factor on outcome.<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> the present study is to develop a model based on the<br />

individual clinical pretreatment parameters to predict survival in<br />

prostate cancer patients after I<strong>12</strong>5 prostate brachytherapy more<br />

accurately.<br />

: From 1989 to 2008, 1694 patients were<br />

treated with I<strong>12</strong>5 brachytherapy. For 1645 patients, all clinical<br />

pretreatment parameters and survival outcome were known. In the<br />

statistical package <strong>of</strong> R, clinical parameters including Tstage (T1,<br />

T2a, T2b and T2c), grade (1, 2 and 3), pretreatment PSA (continuous<br />

parameter) and age (continuous parameter) were related to the<br />

hazard <strong>of</strong> mortality by means <strong>of</strong> multivariate Cox regression analysis.<br />

To assess the discriminative accuracy <strong>of</strong> the model for prediction <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 71<br />

overall and disease specific mortality, the cstatistic was calculated<br />

and compared to the discriminative ability <strong>of</strong> the risk classification<br />

system described by Ash et al.<br />

: Of the 1645 patients analysed, 1441 (87.6%) were alive at<br />

time <strong>of</strong> the censor date (December 2008), 61 (3.7%) died <strong>of</strong> prostate<br />

carcinoma and 143 (8.7%) died <strong>of</strong> nonprostate carcinoma related<br />

death. Median followup time was 4.2 years. The cstatistic <strong>of</strong> our<br />

preliminary model for prediction <strong>of</strong> disease specific mortality was<br />

0.81 (SD 0.055), compared to 0.77 (SD 0.046) for the risk classification<br />

system by Ash et al. Our model showed a cstatistic <strong>of</strong> 0.69 (SD 0.047)<br />

for overall mortality against 0.61 (SD 0.045) for the system <strong>of</strong> Ash et<br />

al.<br />

: Current risk classification systems do not predict survival<br />

accurately. This is probably caused by the fact each clinical<br />

pretreatment factor in these systems has the same weight. Better<br />

prediction <strong>of</strong> survival can be achieved by enabling a different<br />

contribution to the predicted outcome <strong>of</strong> each clinical risk factor in<br />

the model, by using PSA as a continuous variable, and by adding<br />

patient age. This new model is a promising tool for physicians to<br />

predict prostate cancer related mortality prior to treatment. The<br />

predicted risks <strong>of</strong> mortality derived from the new model will be<br />

compared with the observed risks <strong>of</strong> mortality for calibration<br />

purposes. After internal validation, we will develop a nomogram for<br />

prediction <strong>of</strong> survival based on the abovementioned clinical<br />

pretreatment parameters.<br />

PO173<br />

IODINE<strong>12</strong>5 (I<strong>12</strong>5) LOW DOSE RATE (LDR) BRACHYTHERAPY FOR<br />

HIGHER RISK (HR) PROSTATE CANCER<br />

R. Conroy 1 , J. Malik 1 , P. Mandell 1 , R. Swindell 1 , P. Hoskin 2 , D.<br />

Bottomley 3 , J. Logue 1 , J. Wylie 1<br />

1<br />

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Oncology, Manchester,<br />

United Kingdom<br />

2<br />

Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Clinical Oncology, Middlesex, United<br />

Kingdom<br />

3<br />

St James' Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Clinical Oncology, Leeds, United<br />

Kingdom<br />

: LDR brachytherapy <strong>of</strong>fers dose escalation when<br />

compared to external beam radiotherapy alone. It is well established<br />

as monotherapy for patients with low risk (LR) prostate cancer with<br />

<strong>10</strong>year biochemical relapse free survival (bRFS) in different series <strong>of</strong><br />

around 90% with acceptable toxicity. It has been used increasingly in<br />

intermediate risk (IR) prostate cancer, but is not standard <strong>of</strong> care for<br />

high risk (HR) disease. We report the outcomes for a cohort <strong>of</strong> men<br />

with higher risk prostate adenocarcinoma treated with LDR<br />

brachytherapy in a multiinstitutional UK practice.<br />

: Data on patient demographics, dosimetry and<br />

biochemical outcome was obtained from the multiinstitutional<br />

prospective database for patients with higher risk disease treated<br />

between 20032007. High risk was defined as patients with ≥ 2<br />

D’Amico intermediate risk factors (PSA <strong>10</strong>20, GS 7 or clinical T2c) or<br />

≥1 high risk factor (PSA > 20, GS ≥ 8).<br />

KaplanMeier methods were used to estimate bRFS defined using both<br />

ASTRO Phoenix and ASTRO consensus definitions. A univariate analysis<br />

was performed to assess the significance <strong>of</strong> Gleason score, PSA, T<br />

stage, pre or postimplant dosimetry, and additional hormones on<br />

BRFS.<br />

: Two hundred and seventeen men with histologically<br />

confirmed adenocarcinoma <strong>of</strong> prostate were identified with median<br />

age 65 years (range 4379). Median follow up was 62 months (range<br />

14<strong>10</strong>2). All patients were treated with I<strong>12</strong>5 LDR brachytherapy;<br />

67(31%) patients had additional hormone treatment, median duration<br />

7 months (range 3 – 22), and no patients had additional EBRT.<br />

Preimplant dosimetry median V150 59.6 %( 43.789.8), medianV200<br />

20.1 %( 11.636) and postimplant dosimetry on 75 cases (35%),<br />

showed median D90 132.8Gy (range 75192Gy).<br />

The 3 and 5 year bRFS as defined by ASTRO Phoenix were 85.4% and<br />

74.4% and as defined by ASTRO consensus were 76.6% and 69.8%.<br />

On univariate analysis there were no statistically significant predictors<br />

<strong>of</strong> outcome.<br />

: These results show that good bRFS can be obtained with<br />

LDR brachytherapy alone. There was no additional benefit <strong>of</strong> adjuvant<br />

hormone therapy. These results appear comparable to other<br />

treatment modalities available to these patients. To determine the<br />

optimum therapy comparing LDR, HDR and other hyp<strong>of</strong>ractionated<br />

doseescalation regimes for these higher risk patients, randomised<br />

trials are required<br />

PO174<br />

HDR BRACHYTHERAPY BOOST FOR LOCALISED PROSTATE CANCER: THE<br />

FIRST 150 PATIENTS FROM THE SYDNEY CANCER CENTRE.<br />

D. Whalley 1 , N. Patanjali 1 , M. Jackson 1 , G. Perez 1 , M. Whittaker 1 , M.<br />

Chatfield 2 , G. Hruby 1<br />

1<br />

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Sydney NSW,<br />

Australia<br />

2<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney NSW,<br />

Australia<br />

: To report the toxicity and early efficacy <strong>of</strong> high<br />

dose rate brachytherapy (HDR) as a boost to external beam radiation<br />

(EBRT) in the treatment <strong>of</strong> localised prostate cancer.<br />

: Between December 2002 and July 20<strong>10</strong>, 150<br />

consecutive patients with intermediate or high risk prostate cancer<br />

were treated with EBRT (46Gy in 23 fractions) plus an HDR boost. The<br />

HDR boost was initially delivered over a 24 hour period in three<br />

fractions <strong>of</strong> 6.5Gy each via a single implant; this was subsequently<br />

modified to a tw<strong>of</strong>raction outpatient scehdule with separate implants<br />

two weeks apart. All but five patients also received androgen<br />

deprivation therapy for between 3 and 24 months.<br />

: Our cohort included <strong>10</strong>3 intermediate risk and 47 high risk<br />

patients. 83 patients received the three fraction regime and 67 two<br />

fractions. The dose <strong>of</strong> the tw<strong>of</strong>raction brachytherapy course was<br />

escalated over the time interval such that the initial patients received<br />

17Gy (8.5Gy per fraction), and the last five patients received 19Gy<br />

(9.5Gy per fraction). Median follow up was 52 months, at which time<br />

87% <strong>of</strong> patients were free from failure. The 4 year disease free<br />

survival (DFS) for intermediate and high risk groups was 95% and 69%<br />

respectively. Two patients developed metastatic disease. Three<br />

patients died during the follow up period, none <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer.<br />

Significant acute treatment toxicities included clot retention requiring<br />

overnight catheterisation and irrigation (15 patients), two traumatic<br />

urethral injuries, one case <strong>of</strong> retention requiring suprapubic catheter<br />

placement, and one case <strong>of</strong> new onset atrial fibrillation. Three cases<br />

<strong>of</strong> pulmonary emboli were also documented, all <strong>of</strong> which occurred in<br />

patients receiving the three fraction inpatient regime, despite<br />

prophylaxis with enoxaparin. At 4 years, the rate <strong>of</strong> late grade 2 or<br />

worse genitourinary (GU) toxicity was 13%; four patients experienced<br />

grade 3 GU toxicity. Five patients had grade 2 late GI toxicity. No late<br />

grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was observed. Potency was<br />

preserved in 64% <strong>of</strong> those patients reporting normal pretreatment<br />

sexual function.<br />

: Our series <strong>of</strong> patients treated with an HDR boost for<br />

localised prostate cancer reveals promising efficacy results at a<br />

median follow up <strong>of</strong> 4.3 years. The side effect pr<strong>of</strong>ile, with a<br />

predominance <strong>of</strong> GU rather than GI toxicity, is similar to other<br />

published reports.<br />

PO175<br />

CATHETER POSITION CONTROL IN HIGH DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

OF PROSTATE CANCER<br />

P. Marolt 1 , R. Hudej 1 , A. Bernik 2<br />

1<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Brachyradiotherapy, Ljubljana, Slovenia<br />

2<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Ljubljana, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences, Ljubljana,<br />

Slovenia<br />

: The success <strong>of</strong> fractionated high dose rate<br />

brachytherapy depends on the precise implantation and reproducible<br />

catheter positioning. Catheter displacements are <strong>of</strong>ten observed<br />

during fractionated treatments <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer, usually because <strong>of</strong><br />

periprostatic edema, which can be discovered with control imaging.<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to analyze catheter displacement during<br />

HDR brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer.<br />

: 25 patients were included in this study. Total<br />

number <strong>of</strong> cathethers was 377. On average, 15 needles were<br />

implanted per patient (range 11 to 19). All patients were imaged with<br />

MR for planning and with CT for the catheter position check before<br />

the last fraction. Distance from the tip <strong>of</strong> each catheter to gold


S72 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

marker along the catheter line was measured on MR and CT images.<br />

Catheter displacement was calculated as a difference between both<br />

measurements in caudal and cranial directions.<br />

: Absolute median value <strong>of</strong> catheter displacement was 1,9 mm<br />

(range: 15,1 to +8,7 mm; minus and plus signs indicate caudal and<br />

cranial directions, respectively) with 2,2 mm standard deviation. In<br />

one patient all catheter displacements were larger than the tolerance<br />

<strong>of</strong> 3 mm. In this case, patient accidentally pulled catheters out <strong>of</strong><br />

prostate. In ten patients the displacements <strong>of</strong> all catheters were<br />

smaller than tolerance.<br />

With our results we can confirm the results <strong>of</strong> other studies, that the<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> displacements are in the caudal direction. In our case 64%<br />

<strong>of</strong> catheters were shifted in caudal and 36% in the cranial direction.<br />

The shifts may be caused by physiological movements (e.g., amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> water in the bladder), pathology (edema) or artificially induced<br />

(template shifts, patient movements). Calculated values for<br />

displacements presumably include reconstruction errors as well.<br />

Particularly unreliable are catheter reconstructions on MR images in<br />

areas with low cathetertissue contrast, e.g., proximity <strong>of</strong> bladder<br />

wall. However, in the study this was not separately analyzed.<br />

In 84% <strong>of</strong> the patients no out <strong>of</strong> tolerance average catheter shifts<br />

were observed. In <strong>12</strong>% <strong>of</strong> the patients it was necessary to correct a<br />

plan or shift catheters, in 4% <strong>of</strong> patients complete implant was<br />

removed because shifts were too large to correct and the<br />

implantation was repeated 7 days later.<br />

: Catheter displacement is critical for treatment with high<br />

dose rate brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> prostate and should not be ignored.<br />

Without correction and replanning we risk under dosage <strong>of</strong> tumor and<br />

over dosage <strong>of</strong> <strong>org</strong>ans at risk. This study showed that 3D imaging is an<br />

important factor in planning and correcting the position <strong>of</strong><br />

brachytherapy catheters. Together with proper fixation, large<br />

catheter displacements can be avoided.<br />

PO176<br />

EFFICACY, TOXICITY AND DOSIMETRIC ASPECTS OF HDR<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY IN PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS: 5 YEARS<br />

EXPERIENCE<br />

T.M. Filipowski 1 , A. SzmigielTrzcinska 1 , J. TopczewskaBruns 1 , B.<br />

PancewiczJanczuk 2 , W. Nowik 2<br />

1 Bialostockie Centrum Onkologii, Radiotherapy, Bialystok, Poland<br />

2 Bialostockie Centrum Onkologii, Physics, Bialystok, Poland<br />

: To analyze efficacy, toxicity pr<strong>of</strong>ile and<br />

dosimetric aspects <strong>of</strong> radical brachytherapy HDR +/ teleradiotherapy<br />

in prostate cancer patients.<br />

: Between December 2006 and December 2011<br />

190 patients (pts) with prostate cancer (T1 –T2c) underwent<br />

conformal HDR brachytherapy (HDRBRT) with a temporary implant.<br />

The mean age <strong>of</strong> pts was 68 years, while mean PSA – 11,069 [ng/ml].<br />

Gleason score was observed from 3 to 7 and most <strong>of</strong> the patients<br />

received androgen deprivation. 60 patients received 30 Gy in 2<br />

fractions <strong>of</strong> HDR brachytherapy (21 days interval) and were treated to<br />

a dose <strong>of</strong> 30 Gy in 15 fractions with 3D external beam radiotherapy (3<br />

to 5 fields) on to the prostate region.130 patients were treated with<br />

exclusive HDRBRT 45 Gy in 3 fractions (21 days interval). HDR<br />

brachytherapy was delivered using an Iridum192 source<br />

(MicroSelectron, Nucletron) and treatment planning system: SWIFT<br />

2.11.8 and Oncentra Prostate 3.0.9/4.0 realtime treatment planning<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware SWIFT incorporates inverse planning optimization. Dose<br />

volume constraints for this inverse planning system included: prostate<br />

V <strong>10</strong>0 ≥95 %, maximal urethral dose ≤ <strong>12</strong>0% and average rectal dose<br />

≤85% <strong>of</strong> the prescription dose. Patient were monitored weekly during<br />

radiotherapy and 1, 3, 6, 9, 15 months after the end <strong>of</strong> treatment and<br />

then at three months interval. Followup visit included clinical<br />

examination and PSA value assessment. The acute toxicities were<br />

graded according to the EORTC/RTOG scales.<br />

: Median follow up was 18 (603) months with 95% diseasefree<br />

survival rate. The most common urinary symptoms were: urinary<br />

urgency, urinary frequency, dysuria and nocturia in both treatment<br />

options. The rectal symptoms (rectal urgency, frequency and<br />

tenesmus) were rare. No grade 3 and 4 acute toxicities were<br />

recorded. Two death cases were reported during treatment. Overall<br />

survival and late toxicity data need longer followup.<br />

: HDRBRT is a valid treatment modality for patients with<br />

localized prostate cancer. HDRBRT has an important role in achieving<br />

dose escalation for the radical treatment <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer patients.<br />

The treatment was well tolerated by majority <strong>of</strong> patients with<br />

acceptable degree <strong>of</strong> acute toxicities. However, overall survival and<br />

late toxicity data need longer followup.<br />

PO177<br />

HISTOSCANNING BASED DOSE ESCALATION FOR PROSTATE CANCER AS<br />

MICROBOOST USING BRACHYTHERAPY A PHASE IITRIAL<br />

S. Lettmaier 1 , S. Kreppner 1 , M. Lotter 1 , R. Fietkau 1 , V. Strnad 1<br />

1<br />

University Hospital <strong>of</strong> Erlangen, Dept. <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Erlangen, Germany<br />

: The aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to selectively escalate<br />

the dose in tumour areas inside the prostate exploiting the<br />

capabilities <strong>of</strong>fered by imageguided interstitial PDR/HDR<br />

brachytherapy for finetuned dosepainting that allow the creation <strong>of</strong><br />

microboost volumes. The definition <strong>of</strong> tumour areas is based on a<br />

novel ultrasound approach HistoScanning TM . We report our first<br />

experiences regarding feasibility <strong>of</strong> this new approach.<br />

: Between the end <strong>of</strong> August 2011 and January<br />

20<strong>12</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 19 patients with prostate cancer have been treated<br />

according to the study protocol at our institution. Nonmetastatic<br />

patients with prostate cancer <strong>of</strong> any level <strong>of</strong> risk according to the D’<br />

Amico definition are eligible for inclusion. Depending on risk group<br />

temporary interstitial brachytherapy is used either as sole treatment<br />

(low risk) or in combination with EBRT (intermediate and high risk).<br />

The brachytherapy dose prescribed at the prostate capsule was 70 Gy<br />

(<strong>10</strong>0x 0,7Gy) or 38 Gy (4x 9,5 Gy) for sole PDR or HDRbrachytherapy,<br />

respectively and 35 Gy (50x 0,7Gy) or 19 Gy (2x 9,5 Gy) if PDR/HDR<br />

brachytherapy was used as boost following EBRT with 50,4 Gy. Dose<br />

escalation within the tumour areas as defined by HistoScanning (HR<br />

CTV ~ high risk CTV) aiming for V<strong>12</strong>0/HRCTV> 90% was always performed<br />

respecting the dose constraints <strong>of</strong> <strong>org</strong>ans at risk. Side effects will be<br />

assessed using the CTCVers.3, IPSS and IEFF scores as well as the<br />

QOL30 quality <strong>of</strong> life questionnaire. Tumour control will be<br />

monitored through regular PSA checks using the Phoenix definition to<br />

determine failure and correlated to HistoScanning reevaluations.<br />

Trial registration: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov:<br />

NCT01409876.<br />

: Analyzing the treatment plans <strong>of</strong> patients from the first 6<br />

months following the start <strong>of</strong> patient recruitment we can establish as<br />

fact, that dose escalation meeting the requirement that V<strong>12</strong>0/HRCTV be<br />

greater than 90% is possible. The median prostate volume was 30,8<br />

cm³ (range 16,5 71,2cm³); the median volume <strong>of</strong> tissue identified as<br />

tumour by HistoScanning (HRCTV) was 2,9cm³ (range 0,73 4,9cm³).<br />

The median values <strong>of</strong> V<strong>10</strong>0 and D90 for the prostate were 99% (range<br />

90 <strong>10</strong>0%) and 1<strong>12</strong>% (range <strong>10</strong>0 <strong>12</strong>2%), respectively. For the high risk<br />

areas as defined by HistoScanning (HRCTV) we obtained the following<br />

median values: D90=<strong>12</strong>4%, V<strong>12</strong>0=94% and V130=85%. A D90/HRCTV value<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>4% equates to physical dose values <strong>of</strong> 43,4 Gy and 11,8 Gy for a<br />

single PDR or HDR brachytherapy session (PDR 35 Gy, HDR 9,5 Gy),<br />

respectively. The corresponding total biological doses expressed as<br />

EQD2 and assuming α/ß=1 for HRCTV therefore range above <strong>10</strong>0 Gy.<br />

Early followup data up to 3 months fortunately document excellent<br />

tolerability without significant acute side effects – in particular there<br />

were no grade ≥3 toxicities.<br />

: Preliminary data show that using imageguided<br />

interstitial PDR/HDRbrachytherapy a significant dose escalation as<br />

microboost to the tumour regions <strong>of</strong> the prostate is possible while<br />

meeting stringent dose constraints for the adjacent <strong>org</strong>ans at risk.<br />

There seems to be no excessive acute toxicity. The study will<br />

continue.<br />

PO178<br />

PREDICTION OF ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION FOLLOWING PROSTATE<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY: A DOSE VOLUME ANALYSIS OF PENILE STRUCTURES<br />

C. Beaufort 1 , B. Hindson 1 , E. Paul 2<br />

1<br />

William Buckland Radiotherapy Centre, The Alfred, Melbourne,<br />

Australia<br />

2<br />

Monash University, Department <strong>of</strong> Epidemiology and Preventative<br />

Medicine, Melbourne, Australia<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 73<br />

: To identify if the dose to penile structures is a<br />

potential causative factor for severe erectile dysfunction following<br />

low dose rate brachytherapy (LDRB) for prostate cancer in men with<br />

normal pretreatment erectile function.<br />

: The post brachytherapy dosimetry CT<br />

datasets for 69 men with low risk prostate cancer treated between<br />

April 2004 and November 2007 were used. Patients with pre<br />

treatment moderate or poor erectile dysfunction were excluded. The<br />

penile bulb (PB), neurovascular bundle (NVB) and the penile crura<br />

(PC) were retrospectively volumed in a standardised manner and<br />

dosevolumetric parameters were generated.<br />

All patients had low or intermediate risk disease and received LDRB<br />

monotherapy. Four patients received hormone therapy. The dose<br />

prescribed was 145Gy and the dosimetery CT was undertaken at 4<br />

weeks post brachytherapy. All patients were followed prospectively<br />

using the International Index <strong>of</strong> Erectile Function (IIEF)<br />

questionnaires.<br />

For the analysis the patients were divided into a severe erectile<br />

dysfunction group (IIEF


S74 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

keep the maximum value <strong>of</strong> recommendations, therefore becoming<br />

135%.<br />

SPOTPRO and SeedSelectron from Nucletron were used to plan and<br />

automatically build and deliver the trains <strong>of</strong> seeds and spacers.<br />

Inverse planning using the implemented IPSA algorithm with minor<br />

manual adjustments were performed.<br />

DVH parameters <strong>of</strong> 50 patients treated with prostate permanent<br />

brachytherapy with 160 Gy <strong>of</strong> prescription dose are included. Volume<br />

ranges from 17.261.8 cc (average 31.4 std 9.5). D90 <strong>of</strong> prostate and<br />

D<strong>10</strong> together with Dmax for urethra have been analyzed.<br />

: For the urethra, D<strong>10</strong> results in <strong>12</strong>1.1% (average) with range<br />

99.1%140.4% and std 8.5%. Urethra Dmax is significantly higher, in<br />

average 135.3%, with range and std <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong>4.5%189.5% and 15.3%,<br />

respectively.<br />

For the prostate, D90 results in significantly higher than <strong>10</strong>0%, being<br />

in average 115%, with range <strong>10</strong>1.7%<strong>12</strong>8.9% and std 8.5%.<br />

Despite the implemented dose escalation, the urethra D<strong>10</strong> constraint<br />

is maintained according to ESTRO Recommendations, even with a<br />

prostate coverage larger than <strong>10</strong>0%. The advantage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> non regular trains with loosed seeds using the<br />

SeedSelectron plus the IPSA inverse planning makes it feasible. It is<br />

pointed out by evaluating the ratio Urethra D<strong>10</strong> vs. Prostate D90<br />

resulting in average 1.05 with range and std <strong>of</strong> 0.881.23 and 0.06<br />

respectively.<br />

: Dose escalation at 160Gy while keeping the ESTRO<br />

recommended values in coverage and urethra constraint is feasible<br />

and efficient on clinical practice.<br />

PO182<br />

INTRAOPERATIVE REALTIME PLANNED PERMANENTSEED PROSTATE<br />

BT: IMPACT OF TRAINING PROGRAM AND LEARNING CURVE<br />

T. Zilli 1 , M. Alizadeh 1 , D. Taussky 1<br />

1 CRCHUM Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université<br />

de Montréal Hôpital Notre Dame, Radiation Oncology, Montréal,<br />

Canada<br />

: To assess the influence <strong>of</strong> two different<br />

fellowship training programs and the effect <strong>of</strong> learning curve on<br />

dosimetric outcome and genitourinary toxicity in threedimensional<br />

(3D) intraoperative (IO), permanentseed prostate brachytherapy<br />

(PB).<br />

: Between 2005 and 2011, 115 patients with<br />

localized prostate cancer were implanted by two investigators (I1 and<br />

I2) using TRUSguided, 3D IOinteractive planning with virtual needle<br />

guidance, robotic seed delivery, and needle retraction system. Eighty<br />

two percent <strong>of</strong> the patients (n=94) had a lowrisk and 18% (n=21)<br />

intermediaterisk prostate cancer. Median age at implant was 66 years<br />

(range 5178). PSA was


S76 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

kinetics, biochemical failurefree survival, life quality and<br />

intraoperative and postimplant dosimetry results.<br />

: From 2009 to 2011, we treated 56 patients<br />

diagnosed <strong>of</strong> lowrisk prostate adenocarcinoma with LDRBT as<br />

monotherapy, using permanent seeds under spinal anesthesia, using<br />

First System (Nucletron seedSelectron), with perineal insertion<br />

guided by transrectal ultrasound and real time planning. The<br />

prescribed dose for PTV (prostate + 5 mm margin) is 145 Gy.<br />

Ultrasound verification. Postimplant control by CT at 24 hours and<br />

dosimetry at 30 days. Patients are discharged the next day after the<br />

implant. Followup through quarterly PSA levels and life quality<br />

control (QLQ PR25) pre and postimplant.<br />

:With a mean followup <strong>of</strong> 20 months, the biochemical failure<br />

free survival rate is 98.2%/year, (biochemical relapse occurred in one<br />

patient, M1 bone) with an average number <strong>of</strong> seeds per implant: 67.51<br />

(5492); mean activity <strong>of</strong> 0,5317 cGy/cm2/h (0,46730,61<strong>10</strong>); D 90:<br />

118.23% (94,68 % <strong>12</strong>8,67 %), V<strong>10</strong>0: 97.5% (87,42 % <strong>12</strong>2,55 %), V150:<br />

69.4% (49,64% 82,67 %); Uretra_V150: 0; Rectum D2cc: 63.31% (44,47<br />

% <strong>12</strong>7,76 %). Acute toxicity (


S78 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

toxicities at 1 and 6 months after the boost regarding the<br />

fractionation scheme applied is presented in the Table 1.<br />

Table 1: Analysis <strong>of</strong> GU and GI complications observed at 1 and 6<br />

months after HDRB boost regarding the complication grade (CTCv3.0)<br />

and the different fractionation schemes.<br />

Complications GU GI<br />

Grades<br />

1 mth 6 mths 1 mth 6 mths<br />

0 59% 65% 83% 76%<br />

1 34% 35% 17% 23%<br />

2 6% 0% 0% 1%<br />

3 0% 0% 0% 0%<br />

4 1% 0% 0% 0%<br />

Fract. schemes<br />

G1 (18 Gy/3f) 24%* 65% 6% 50%<br />

G2 (18 Gy/2f) 56% 35% 53% 50%<br />

G3 (14 Gy/1f) 20% 41% <br />

p value 0.53 0.86 0.21 0.34<br />

* Percentages <strong>of</strong> complication among patients who developed GU<br />

and/or GI complications.<br />

GU: genitourinary complications; GI: gastrointestinal complications;<br />

Fract. Schemes: fractionation schemes.<br />

: From 02/2009 to 09/2011, while a significant physical<br />

dose escalation was performed (33% and <strong>10</strong>% between G1 vs G3 and<br />

G2 vs G3 respectively), no significant increasing <strong>of</strong> the GU and GI<br />

acute toxicities was observed.<br />

PO193<br />

HIGH DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY AS MONOTHERAPY FOR EARLY<br />

STAGE PROSTATE CANCER: TOXICITY AND EARLY RESULTS<br />

S. Aluwini 1 , P. van Rooij 1 , J. Praag 1 , P. Jansen 1 , C. Jauns 1 , W. Kirkels 2 ,<br />

I. KolkmanDeurloo 1<br />

1<br />

Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam,<br />

The Netherlands<br />

2<br />

Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Urology, Rotterdam, The<br />

Netherlands<br />

: The use <strong>of</strong> HDR Brach therapy (HDRBT) as<br />

monotherapy for early stage prostate cancer (PC) patients is<br />

increasing worldwide. We report our results on toxicity and clinical<br />

outcome after this regimen.<br />

: Between 2007 and 2011, 93 consecutive<br />

patients were treated with HDRBT for earlystage PC. Total dose was<br />

38 Gy in 4 fractions within 36 hours. Toxicity and Quality <strong>of</strong> life (QoL)<br />

was assessed prospectively using validated questionnaires.<br />

Biochemical Failure (BF) was determined according to the Phoenix<br />

definition.<br />

: Median FU was 25 months. Median pretreatment prostate<br />

volume was 32 cc. Median number <strong>of</strong> needles was 17. No Surgical<br />

complications were reported. The constraints regarding bladder,<br />

rectum, and urethra were well met.<br />

Biochemical failure occurred in 2 patients. The 3year actuarial<br />

biochemical control rate was 98%. Mean nadir PSA was 0.4 ng/ml.<br />

Median International prostate symptoms score (IPSS) was 6 before<br />

treatment and showed a median increase <strong>of</strong> 5 after 3 months, and<br />

remained stable afterward. The EORTC/RTOG toxicity scales showed<br />

grade ≥ 2 rectal toxicity, in 7%3%2%2% after 3<strong>12</strong>2436 months,<br />

respectively. Grade 3 rectal toxicity was reported in 3% at 3 months.<br />

There was no instance <strong>of</strong> late grade 3 rectal toxicity. Genitourinary<br />

(GU) grade ≥2 toxicity was seen in 7% 23%19%17% after 3<strong>12</strong>2436<br />

months, respectively. A grade 3 GU toxicity was seen in 6%3%2%,2%<br />

after 3<strong>12</strong>2436 months, respectively. Seven patients needed a<br />

temporary catheter shortly after the treatment. The 3 assessed<br />

domains (urinary, bowel and sexual) <strong>of</strong> the PR25 questionnaire did<br />

recover with the time.<br />

: HDRBT as monotherapy for favourablerisk prostate<br />

cancer was well tolerated with acceptable acute and late toxicity and<br />

excellent biochemical control after 3 years. Longer FU is still required<br />

to evaluate the efficacy<br />

PO194<br />

ULTRASOUNDCT FUSION COMPARED TO MRCT FUSION FOR POST<br />

IMPLANT DOSIMETRY IN PERMANENT PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

J.M. Crook 1 , C. Araujo 2 , M. Gaztanaga 1 , D. Batchelar 2 , D.M. Bowes 3<br />

1<br />

British Columbia Cancer Agency Center for the Southern Interior,<br />

Radiation Oncology, Kelowna B.C., Canada<br />

2<br />

British Columbia Cancer Agency Center for the Southern Interior,<br />

Radiation Physics, Kelowna B.C., Canada<br />

3<br />

Nova Scotia Cancer Center, Radiation Medicine, Halifax, Canada<br />

: Postplan evaluation is essential for quality<br />

assurance in prostate brachytherapy (BT). MRI has demonstrated<br />

greater interobserver consistency in prostate contouring compared<br />

with CT. Although a valuable tool in postimplant assessment, MRI is<br />

costly and not always available. Our purpose is to compare dosimetry<br />

obtained using fusion <strong>of</strong> postimplant CT to preimplant transrectal<br />

ultrasound (TRUS) vs. CTMR fusion.<br />

: 20 patients receiving permanent I<strong>12</strong>5 seed<br />

prostate BT underwent preimplant TRUS with urethrography, one<br />

month CT with a Foley catheter, and one month MRI. No patient<br />

received androgen deprivation or external beam radiotherapy. The<br />

prescription dose <strong>of</strong> I<strong>12</strong>5 implant monotherapy was 144 Gy. The pre<br />

implant TRUS and postimplant CT images were fused based on<br />

urethral position, and the CTTRUS images were subsequently fused to<br />

the MRI using a seedtoseed match. Dosimetric parameters for the<br />

USderived and MRderived prostate contours were compared.<br />

: There were no significant differences in D90, V<strong>10</strong>0, V150,<br />

and V200 when comparing dosimetry obtained using MRI and CTTRUS<br />

fusion. The mean absolute difference between dosimetry from MR<br />

imaging or CTTRUS fusion for D90 was 3.2% and in V<strong>10</strong>0 was 1.2%.<br />

Only 1 patient had a difference in MR and USderived D90 <strong>of</strong> > <strong>10</strong>%<br />

(11.4%) and only one had a difference in V<strong>10</strong>0 <strong>of</strong> > 5%. There were no<br />

implants in this group in which the D90 was less than 1<strong>10</strong>% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

prescription dose. Although volume differences appeared more<br />

substantial (11/20 > <strong>10</strong>%), the actual magnitude <strong>of</strong> the difference was<br />

small with a mean absolute difference as calculated between MR and<br />

US <strong>of</strong> only 3.0 cc (maximum 7.5 cc).<br />

Median value (IQ range) CTTRUS fusion CTMR fusion<br />

Volume 32.8 cc (25.8, 42.6) 31.1 cc (25.8, 37.6)<br />

D90 <strong>12</strong>0.0% (117.4, 132.2) <strong>12</strong>2.8% (115.0, 132.4)<br />

V<strong>10</strong>0 97.8% (95.4 ,98.9) 97.8% (94.9, 98.8)<br />

V150 71.5% (64.7, 75.6) 72.6% (62.7, 77.5)<br />

V200 37.2% (28.9, 41.2) 36.0 (26.6, 42.4)<br />

: Fusion <strong>of</strong> preimplant TRUS with 1month postimplant<br />

CT appears to lead to acceptable agreement with MRbased<br />

dosimetric parameters in postplan evaluation. TRUS based contours<br />

may be a reasonable option when MR is not available.<br />

PO195<br />

BIOCHEMICAL RESULTS FOR HIGH RISK PROSTATE CANCER AFTER HIGH<br />

DOSERATE BRACHYTHERAPY WITH EXTERNAL RADIOTHERAPY<br />

E. Arrojo Alvarez 1 , P.J. Prada 1 , L. Méndez 1 , J. Fernández 2 , H.<br />

González 1 , I. Jiménez 1<br />

1<br />

Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Radiation Oncology,<br />

Oviedo, Spain<br />

2<br />

Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Radiation Physics, Oviedo,<br />

Spain<br />

: We analyzed the longterm oncologic outcome for<br />

patients with high risk prostate cancer who were treated using high<br />

doserate conformal brachytherapy combined with external<br />

irradiation.<br />

: From June 1998 to August 2006, 252 patients<br />

with localized high risk prostate cancer were treated. The median<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 79<br />

followup was 74 months. Freedom from biochemical failure rates<br />

were calculated using the Phoenix definition. Toxicity was reported<br />

according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Event, Version<br />

4.0.<br />

: The biochemical control was 84% and 78% (SD ±2%) at 5 and<br />

<strong>10</strong> years respectively. The <strong>10</strong>year actuarial biochemical control was<br />

89% for patients with two intermediate risk criteria, 80% with one high<br />

risk criteria and 72% for patients with 23 high risk criteria (P = 0. 04).<br />

The <strong>10</strong> year cause specific survival was 93% (SD ±2%) and the overall<br />

survival was 88% and 78% (SD ±4%) at 5 and <strong>10</strong> years respectively. The<br />

multivariate Cox regression analyses identified, Gleason score as<br />

independent prognostic factors for biochemical failure and distant<br />

metastases.<br />

: External beam radiation therapy with conformal high<br />

dose rate brachytherapy boost for patients with high risk localized<br />

prostate cancer represents a considerable improvement over standard<br />

surgical and radiotherapy modalities.<br />

PO196<br />

NATURAL DOSE VOLUME HISTOGRAM: RELATION WITH VOLUME OF<br />

TARGET AND SEEDS PER NEEDLE IN PERMANENT PROSTATE IMPLANTS<br />

R. Martinez Cobo 1 , E. Rivin del Campo 2 , J.M. Roldán Arjona 1 , A.<br />

Palacios Eito 2<br />

1<br />

Reina S<strong>of</strong>ía University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Physics and<br />

Radiologic Protection, Cordoba, Spain<br />

2<br />

Reina S<strong>of</strong>ía University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Cordoba, Spain<br />

: The Natural Dose Volume Histogram (NVDH)<br />

allows the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the implant quality (homogeneity <strong>of</strong> dose<br />

distribution and underdosage or overdosage <strong>of</strong> treated volume).<br />

This is a retrospective and descriptive analysis <strong>of</strong> results found when<br />

comparing different indexes obtained from NDVH (Uniformity Index<br />

(UI), Quality Index (QI) and Natural Dose Ratio (NDR)) with the volume<br />

<strong>of</strong> the target and the number <strong>of</strong> seeds per needle. The objective <strong>of</strong><br />

this study is to find differences in these indexes in relation to the<br />

volume <strong>of</strong> the target and the number <strong>of</strong> seeds per needle used in the<br />

implant.<br />

: The reviewed data belongs to treatments<br />

performed between 200720<strong>12</strong>. The prescribed dose to the volume <strong>of</strong><br />

the target was 145 Gy and the V150 to urethra was restricted to 0.00<br />

cm 3 . The manufacturer <strong>of</strong> the radioactive sources (I<strong>12</strong>5) provides 14<br />

possible source activities, <strong>of</strong> which only four types have been used.<br />

The equipment used in the implants is known as FIRST (Nucletron).<br />

This system has a planning program (SPOT PRO v3.0) with which the<br />

parameters <strong>of</strong> NDVH and volumes <strong>of</strong> the target have been calculated.<br />

To study the relationship between the indexes obtained from the<br />

NDVH with both the volume <strong>of</strong> the target and the number <strong>of</strong> seeds per<br />

needle, implants were divided into three groups according to the<br />

values <strong>of</strong> these two parameters. The chosen cut<strong>of</strong>f values allowed a<br />

similar distribution <strong>of</strong> individuals in each group. For the volume <strong>of</strong> the<br />

target, the first group included target volumes under 21 cm 3 , the<br />

second group between 21 and 28 cm 3 and the third group above 28<br />

cm 3 . Regarding the number <strong>of</strong> seeds per needle, the first group<br />

contains individuals with a less than 2.75, the second group between<br />

2.75 and 3.1 and the third group above 3.1.<br />

: The results for the mean value <strong>of</strong> each parameter <strong>of</strong> NDVH<br />

depending on the volume <strong>of</strong> the target are shown in Table 1. The<br />

results for the mean value <strong>of</strong> each parameter <strong>of</strong> NDVH in relation to<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> seeds per needle are represented in Table 2.<br />

: These results indicate that there is a statistically<br />

significant difference in NDVH depending on the volume <strong>of</strong> the target,<br />

finding the best results in both homogeneity <strong>of</strong> spatial dose<br />

distribution and in coverage <strong>of</strong> the volume <strong>of</strong> the target in larger<br />

volumes <strong>of</strong> the target. These differences could be considered<br />

selection criteria to determine the best candidates for a permanent<br />

prostate implant. In the case <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> seeds per needle, the<br />

value <strong>of</strong> the NDR in NDVH is significantly different depending on the<br />

group considered, obtaining better values when the number <strong>of</strong> seeds<br />

per needle increases. A trend towards a better implant quality was<br />

found, based on the QI and UI results, when the number <strong>of</strong> seeds per<br />

needle is higher.<br />

PO197<br />

HIGH DEFINITION CUSTOMISED BRACHYTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE<br />

CANCER BASED ON TRANSPERINEAL SECTOR MAPPING BIOPSIES<br />

S.L. Morris 1 , M. McGovern 2 , R. Tsung 3 , S.L. Aldridge 2 , B. Challacombe 3 ,<br />

R.B. Beaney 1 , R.B. Popert 3<br />

1 Guys Hospital London UK, Clinical Oncology, London, United Kingdom<br />

2 Guys Hospital London UK, Physics, London, United Kingdom<br />

3 Guys Hospital London UK, Urology, London, United Kingdom<br />

: Customised dose prescription for prostate LDR<br />

brachytherapy is possible and it has been shown that higher doses<br />

improve biochemical control. Transperineal sector mapping biopsies<br />

(TPSMB) can identify areas <strong>of</strong> dominant intraprostatic involvement.<br />

This planning study investigates the feasibility <strong>of</strong> dose escalation<br />

during brachytherapy planning to the dominant involved sectors<br />

: This study was carried out on the<br />

brachytherapy plans <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> patients treated with our real time dynamic<br />

dose feedback (4D) technique. All patients with low risk prostate<br />

cancer underwent a pre implant MRI scan and Transperineal sector<br />

mapping biopsy (TPSMB) to assess their suitability for either Active<br />

Surveillance or <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> and to exclude any adverse features not<br />

identified on the Transrectal biopsy. The TPSMB provides information<br />

on the apico to basal and medial to lateral distribution <strong>of</strong> tumour<br />

within the prostate based upon 8 sectors. The dynamic plans were<br />

created using the Variseed 8 s<strong>of</strong>tware. A protocol for outlining the<br />

sectors biopsied; right and left apex, right and left mid gland in<br />

anterior and posterior sectors and right and left base was developed<br />

to match the sector mapping technique. Depending upon the<br />

histological involvement dominant sectors were boosted to > 200Gy,<br />

whilst maintaining the conventional prostate brachytherapy dose<br />

constraints.<br />

: The planning study showed that dominant sectors can be<br />

boosted to > 200Gy while keeping within the standard constraints. The<br />

example below is <strong>of</strong> a patient where the right posterior sector showed<br />

the highest number <strong>of</strong> cores and % <strong>of</strong> core involvement on biopsy. The<br />

customised plan allowed boosting <strong>of</strong> this sector to a D90 <strong>of</strong> 248.8Gy,<br />

while the whole Prostate D90 was 180.9Gy, V200 <strong>of</strong> 32.9%, Rectal<br />

V<strong>10</strong>0 <strong>of</strong> 0.8cc, D2cc <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>2.8Gy, D0.1cc <strong>of</strong> 184Gy and Urethral V140 <strong>of</strong><br />

0.01%, D30% <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>7.8Gy, D<strong>10</strong>% <strong>of</strong> 130.9Gy.


S80 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Fig 1 Dose distribution <strong>of</strong> sector boost mid prostate:<br />

: Customised dose escalation to dominant sector<br />

involvement in the prostate with brachytherapy is possible and needs<br />

to be tested in the clinical setting.<br />

PO198<br />

COMPARISON OF TREATMENT PLAN PARAMETERS IN BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

OF PROSTATE CANCER IN DIFFERENT SCHEDULES<br />

M. Kanikowski 1 , J. Skowronek 1 , A. Chichel 1<br />

1 Greater Poland Cancer Centre, <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Poznan, Poland<br />

: Radiotherapy (EBRT and HDRBT) in prostate<br />

cancer treatment seems to be nowdays as effective as surgery<br />

procedure. High dose rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) can be applied as a<br />

single modality treatment in patients from low and intermediate risk<br />

group with localized tumors. High dose rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) is<br />

very usefull in high risk group patients, in increasing prostate dose<br />

after EBRT (boost) which shortens whole radiation treatment. There is<br />

no clear recommendations about doses and schemes <strong>of</strong> combined<br />

radiation treatment (EBRTBT). The aim <strong>of</strong> this work was to make<br />

comparison <strong>of</strong> dosevolume parameters beetween (HDRBT) fractions,<br />

in patients prostate cancer treated in two combined with external<br />

beam radiotherapy schedules and one monotherapy.<br />

: <strong>10</strong>3 patients were enrolled to the study and<br />

divided to groups according to radiation schemes (I – EBRT 50 Gy/BRT<br />

1 x 15 Gy, II – EBRT 46 Gy/BRT 2 x <strong>10</strong> Gy, III – BRT 3 x 15 Gy) Group I,<br />

II, III consisted <strong>of</strong> 37 (35,92%), 36 (34,95%), 30 (29,13%) patients<br />

respectively. The mean value <strong>of</strong> D90 (reference dose given to 90% <strong>of</strong><br />

volume) was 90,86%, 88,23% and 92,03% respectively to each group.<br />

Hot spots parameters in target volume (V200, V150, V<strong>12</strong>0, Dmax) were<br />

found respectively: I – 15,22%, 41,48%, 69,47%, 1192,46%, II – 16,31%,<br />

40,09%, 66,61%, 1906,19%, III 14,97%, 39,3%, 67,53%, 1182,16%. Mean<br />

urethral D<strong>10</strong> (dose given to <strong>10</strong>% <strong>of</strong> urethral volume) was estabilished<br />

on respectively: <strong>12</strong>2,32%, <strong>12</strong>3,48% and <strong>12</strong>0,37%. Mean values <strong>of</strong> high<br />

doses parameters for urethra (Dmax, V<strong>10</strong>0, Dmean) were as follows<br />

respectively for I group: 143,18%, 53,76%, 90,23%, for II: 144,7%,<br />

53,76%, 97,34% and for III: 140,79%, 46,57%, 86,79%. Mean rectal D<strong>10</strong><br />

dose was estimated as 62,19% (I), 63,8 (II), 65,21% (III). According to<br />

parameters Dmax (90,76% I, 90,85% II, 84,68% III), V<strong>10</strong>0 (0,43% I,<br />

0,23% II, 0,18% III), Dmean (46,06% I, 46,27% II and 49,35% III)<br />

were found as a hot spots in rectum volume. Comparison <strong>of</strong> dose<br />

volume parameters was done by KruskalWallis and MannWhitney<br />

tests.<br />

: After statistical comparison we observed higher values <strong>of</strong><br />

high target doses (V200, Dmax) in the second group <strong>of</strong> patients.<br />

Parameter V<strong>12</strong>0 was the only one with statistical significance in<br />

KruskalWallis test (p=00264). According to these changes, parameters<br />

<strong>of</strong> target doses like D90 (87,76%) and V<strong>10</strong>0 (82,5%) were lower in II<br />

than the other groups (without statistical significance). The urethral<br />

high dosevolume parameters were much higher in 46/ 2 x <strong>10</strong> Gy<br />

group D<strong>10</strong> (<strong>12</strong>3,48%), Dmean (97,69%), V<strong>10</strong>0 (54,2%), also without<br />

statistical significance. In the second group parameter Dmax (90,95%)<br />

for another <strong>org</strong>ans at risk (rectum) was the highest and with smallest<br />

value <strong>of</strong> SD parameter (<strong>10</strong>,83%) can increase risk <strong>of</strong> serious<br />

complications in this localization.<br />

: 1. HDR brachytherapy parameters in prostate cancer<br />

treatment are not statistically different in most treatment schedules.<br />

2. HDR brachytherapy schedule with two lower doses fractions was<br />

less correct in terms <strong>of</strong> treatment planning system constraints. 3. To<br />

confirm differences between each treatment schedule a comperative<br />

investigation in larger groups is needed. 4. To confirm value <strong>of</strong><br />

treatment parameters comparison observation <strong>of</strong> results and<br />

complications is also needed.<br />

PO199<br />

PROSTATE VOLUMEBASED NOMOGRAMS FOR PROSTATE SEED<br />

IMPLANTS: CUSTOMIZING FOR A RANGE OF SEED ACTIVITIES<br />

S.J. Gardner 1 , K.L. Chapman 1 , A.P. Dicker 1 , T.N. Showalter 1 , L.A.<br />

Doyle 1<br />

1<br />

Jefferson Medical College <strong>of</strong> Thomas Jefferson University, Radiation<br />

Oncology, Philadelphia, USA<br />

: The use <strong>of</strong> a nomogram to predict the number <strong>of</strong><br />

seeds needed for an intraoperative prostate seed implant is common<br />

in radiation oncology. One such nomogram for I<strong>12</strong>5 implants,<br />

developed by Wu et al., relates prostate volume to I<strong>12</strong>5 activity<br />

without specifying the activity per seed. In this study, we evaluate<br />

treatment plans for 22 consecutive patients, with one plan for each <strong>of</strong><br />

4 seed activities (0.3, 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6 mCi; 88 total plans), to<br />

determine appropriate nomograms across a range <strong>of</strong> seed activities.<br />

: Treatment plans were generated for 22<br />

patients using intraoperative ultrasound images. Treatment plans<br />

were generated using Variseed 8.0.1 s<strong>of</strong>tware and Bard STM <strong>12</strong>51 I<br />

<strong>12</strong>5 seeds, using four activities (0.3 mCi, 0.4 mCi, 0.5 mCi, and 0.6<br />

mCi) with a modified peripheral loading technique. The seed<br />

activities were chosen based on the normal range <strong>of</strong> seed activity for<br />

permanent prostate seed implants (0.30.8 mCi), as specified by AAPM<br />

Task Group 64. The dose calculation was performed according to 1D<br />

TG43 formalism. The nominal treatment prescription dose was 145<br />

Gy to greater than 98% <strong>of</strong> the prostate. Additional planning<br />

constraints included D_PTV(90%)>170 Gy, D_PTV(150%)


S82 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

: Permanent <strong>12</strong>5 I seed BT is a successful and established<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> earlystage prostate cancer. Although this sample<br />

represents the learning curve <strong>of</strong> our institution the outcomes are<br />

similar to the literature.<br />

PO202<br />

LONG TERM RESULTS WITH MULTIMODALITY RADIOTHERAPY (3D, IGRT,<br />

LDRBT, HDRBT) IN PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA<br />

S. Rodríguez Villalba 1 , M. Santos Ortega 1 , M. Deppiagio 1 , J. Pérez<br />

Calatayud 1 , J. Richart 1 , F. Ballester 2<br />

1<br />

Clinica Benidorm, Radiation Oncology, Benidorm, Spain<br />

2<br />

Valencia University, Atomic Molecular and Nuclear Physicist,<br />

Valencia, Spain<br />

: A retrospective analysis is made evaluating the<br />

toxicity and efficacy <strong>of</strong> different multimodality radiotherapy<br />

approaches for <strong>org</strong>an confined prostate cancer in our Institution with<br />

a minimum followup <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong> months.<br />

: From September 2004 to December 20<strong>10</strong> we<br />

have treated in our Department with a radical treatment 262<br />

patients. Our protocol has been based with uniformity on the risk<br />

classification <strong>of</strong> prostate adenocarcinoma. It includes external<br />

radiotherapy (extRT)(3D or IGRT) or LDRBT in low risk patients, IGRT<br />

or combined treatment (3D over prostate and seminal vesicles+<br />

LDRBT) in intermediate risk patients and IGRT or combined treatment<br />

(IMRT over pelvis and HDRBT) in high risk patients. 48 p (18.3%) have<br />

been treated with extRT3D, 58p(22%) with IGRT, 68p (26%) with<br />

LDRBT, 59 p (22.5%) with combined 3D + LDRBT and 29p (11.1%) with<br />

combined IMRT and HDRBT. Median age 71 years (4687 y). Median PSA<br />

at diagnostic 9.74 ng/ml (2.5 500 ng/ml). Median Gleason 6 (29). 75<br />

p (29%) were included in low risk (LR), 97 (37%) intermediate risk (IR)<br />

and 90 (34%) in high risk (HR).<br />

: The local control have been reach in 254 p (97%). All patients<br />

treated with IGRT, 3D+ LDRBT and IMRT + HDRBT are under local<br />

control. Two patients treated with 3D and 6 p (9%) treated with<br />

LDRBT exclusively have local failure. The local failure have been<br />

produced in 1 patient treated with 7200 cGy and 1p treated with 7560<br />

cGy.<br />

Biochemical failure have been reached in 8p (3%). 2p (0.8%) <strong>of</strong> LR, 4<br />

(1.5%) IR and 2p (0.8%) <strong>of</strong> HR<br />

We have evidenced lymph node failure in 6p (2%). One p (0.4%) <strong>of</strong> IR<br />

and 5p (1.9%) <strong>of</strong> HR. 3p treated with extRT3D (1%), 2p IGRT (0.8%) and<br />

1 p with 3D+ LDRBT (0.4%).<br />

Distance failure in 13p (5%).5p (1.9%) <strong>of</strong> IR and 8 p (3.1%) <strong>of</strong> HR. 6 p<br />

treated with extRT3D (3.3%), 4 with IGRT (1.6%), 1 with LDRBT (0.4%)<br />

and 2 with 3D+ LDRBT (0.8%).<br />

The toxicity evaluated is:<br />

GENITOURINARY (GU) TOXICITY # TREATMENT<br />

GRADE 3<br />

Hematuria 4 p 3 p IGRT and 1p with 3D+<br />

(1.5%) LDRBT<br />

Cystitis 1p IGRT<br />

(0.4%)<br />

Urinary obstruction 3p 1p IGRT and 2p LDRBT<br />

(1.1%)<br />

Urethral stenosis 4p<br />

(1.5%)<br />

Increased <strong>of</strong> the urinary frequency 2p<br />

(0.8%)<br />

Urinary retention 2p<br />

(0.8%)<br />

GASTROINTESTINAL (GI) TOXICITY<br />

GRADE 3<br />

Diarrhea 1p<br />

(0.4%)<br />

Rectitis 23p<br />

(8.8%)<br />

2p IGRT and 2p 3D +<br />

LDRBT<br />

1p IGRT and 1p 3D +<br />

LDRBT<br />

IMRT and HDRBT<br />

IGRT<br />

IGRT<br />

Median time for GU toxicity 3 months (148 months).<br />

Median time for GI toxicity <strong>10</strong>.5 months (040 months).<br />

Only one patient treated with 3D+ LDRBT had rectitis grade 3. This<br />

patient was treated previously <strong>of</strong> an embolism <strong>of</strong> an iliac aneurism<br />

several years ago with changes in the vascular drainage).<br />

At the end <strong>of</strong> the followup, December <strong>of</strong> 20<strong>10</strong>, 216 p (82%) are alive<br />

without any evidence <strong>of</strong> disease, 4 p (1.5%) are alive with Biochemical<br />

failure, 18 (7%) have died <strong>of</strong> an intercurrent disease, 4 (1.5%) have<br />

loose <strong>of</strong> control, 13 p (5%) live with active prostate disease and 7 (3%)<br />

have died <strong>of</strong> prostate tumor. The median followup is 35.5 months (5<br />

88 months)<br />

: Despite the good outcomes obtained with the different<br />

radiotherapy approaches our results shows a better disease control<br />

with more intensive radiotherapy doses. In our experience,<br />

combination modalities with BT techniques achieve more intensity<br />

treatments with lesser toxic <strong>events</strong>, mainly related to gastrointestinal<br />

damage.<br />

PO203<br />

RECTUM PRESERVATION BY BOLUS HYALURONAN INJECTION INTO<br />

PERI/PARA RECTAL SPACE DURING HDRBT OF PROSTATE CANCER<br />

K. Kishi 1 , M. Sato 1 , Y. Noda 1 , T. Sonomura 1 , S. Shirai 1 , R. Yamada 2<br />

1<br />

Wakayama Medical University, Radiation Oncology, Wakayama City,<br />

Japan<br />

2<br />

Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Urology, Kishiwada City, Japan<br />

: To evaluate feasibility and effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

nativetype hyaluronate gel injection (HGI) to reduce the rectal dose<br />

during high dose rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDRBT) <strong>of</strong> prostate<br />

cancer, by comparing HGI and control groups.<br />

: From Jun 2006 to September 2008, 40<br />

patients with T2aT3a prostate cancer were treated with a combined<br />

schedule <strong>of</strong> 50Gy <strong>of</strong> external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by<br />

HDRBT. 17 patients underwent bolus HGI into anterior part <strong>of</strong><br />

perirectal space. The other 23 including 17 with matched prostate<br />

size were randomly sampled for control from database in the same<br />

period.<br />

: The HGI procedure was easily performed and took approx.<br />

ten minutes. There were no procedurerelated complications. By HGI,<br />

the rectum was shrunken and shifted posteriorly. The minimum<br />

rectoprostate distance was increased from 0.3±0.4 to 2.6±0.7cm<br />

(mean ±sd) after gel injection, and shrunk the rectum volume behind<br />

the prostate level decreases to 21.7±7.6% <strong>of</strong> the original size, and<br />

further gas inflation <strong>of</strong> the rectum was blocked. <strong>12</strong>.46Gy±2.14 bid was<br />

prescribed in control group and 14.52Gy±2.0 in single fraction in HGI<br />

group (p


S84 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

hyp<strong>of</strong>ractionated radiotherapy or highdoserate brachytherapy (HDR<br />

BT) regimens using appropriate radiation doses are expected to<br />

improve the local control rate for localized prostate cancer. However,<br />

the increase in the total biological effective dose (BED) may cause an<br />

increase in the severity and incidence <strong>of</strong> normal tissue complications.<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to investigate if the clinical and<br />

dosimetric factors affected the incidence <strong>of</strong> rectal bleeding after<br />

HDRBT combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).<br />

: The records <strong>of</strong> 150 patients with localized<br />

prostate cancer treated by HDRBT combined with EBRT at Kochi<br />

Medical School Hospital between November 2004 and December 2008<br />

were analyzed. The fractionation schema for HDRBT and EBRT was<br />

prospectively changed. The distribution <strong>of</strong> the fractionation schema<br />

used in the patients was as follows: 9 Gy x 2 + 2 Gy x 20 (BED1.5 = 219<br />

Gy, BED3 = 139 Gy) in 59 patients (Group 1); and 9 Gy x 2 + 3 Gy x 13<br />

(BED1.5 = 243 Gy, BED3 = 150 Gy) in 91 patients (Group 2). The median<br />

followup duration was 49months (range 24 – 61 months). The<br />

toxicities were graded based on the National Cancer Institute<br />

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. The clinical<br />

and dosimetric factors affecting the incidence <strong>of</strong> Grade 2 or worse<br />

late rectal bleeding were analyzed by statistical analyses.<br />

: Fifteen (<strong>10</strong>.0 %) and 2 (1.3 %) patients developed Grade 2 and<br />

3 rectal bleeding, respectively. Seven out <strong>of</strong> 59 (11.9 %) patients<br />

belonged to Group 1 and <strong>10</strong> out <strong>of</strong> 91 (11.0 %) patients belonged to<br />

Group 2 developed Grade 2 or worse rectal bleeding. There was no<br />

statisticallysignificant correlation between the incidence <strong>of</strong> Grade 2<br />

rectal bleeding and dose escalation. Regarding the correlation with<br />

dosimetric factors, no significant differences were found in the means<br />

<strong>of</strong> V<strong>10</strong>, V30, V50, V70, V75, V90, D0.1cc, D0.2cc, D0.5cc, D1cc, D2cc,<br />

D5cc, and D<strong>10</strong>cc between those with bleeding and those without in<br />

each Group. Grade 2 or worse rectal bleeding occurred in 6 out <strong>of</strong> 31<br />

(19.4 %) patients receiving the antiplatelet therapy, while it occurred<br />

in 11 out <strong>of</strong> 119 (9.2%) patients without a history <strong>of</strong> antiplatelet<br />

therapy, and Grade 2 or worse rectal bleeding occurred much more in<br />

the patients receiving the antiplatelet therapy than those without a<br />

history <strong>of</strong> antiplatelet therapy, however it was no statistically<br />

significant difference between two groups.<br />

: Dose escalation could be performed without severe<br />

rectal bleeding in HDRBT combined with EBRT. HDRBT combined<br />

with EBRT is possible to perform to even the patient receiving the<br />

antiplatelet therapy. However, further investigation will be needed.<br />

PO208<br />

QUALITY OF HDR BRACHYTHERAPY OF FAVORABLE LOCALIZED<br />

PROSTATE CANCER AND NUMBER OF IMPLANTED NEEDLES<br />

E. Slobina 1 , D. Kozlovsky 1 , A. Soroka 1 , Y. Ezhgurova 2<br />

1<br />

N.N. Alexandrov National Cancer Center <strong>of</strong> Belarus, Radiotherapy,<br />

Minsk, Belarus<br />

2<br />

Minsk Regional Oncology Dispensar, Radiotherapy, Minsk, Belarus<br />

: To assess the dependence <strong>of</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> 192 Iridium<br />

HDR interstitial imageguided brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> localized prostate<br />

cancer with favorable prognostic factors from number <strong>of</strong> implanted<br />

needles.<br />

: Between February 2007 and December 2011 a<br />

total <strong>of</strong> 60 previously healthy patients, Table 1, with favorable<br />

prognostic factors (Gleason score ≤ 7, PSA ≤ <strong>10</strong> ng/ml) and biopsy<br />

proven adenocarcinoma. HDR brachytherapy was performed by<br />

conformal imageguided transperineal HDR brachytherapy with real<br />

time planning.<br />

<br />

Mean age (years) 69<br />

Age range (years) 4581<br />

Stage T2N0M0 60<br />

Histology<br />

Adenocarcinoma 60<br />

Gleason score 3 20<br />

4 5<br />

5 31<br />

6 4<br />

Median pretreatment PSA 8.2 ng/ml<br />

<br />

Table 1. Study population.<br />

The total dose was 34.5 Gy/3 fractions (3 consecutive fractions with 2<br />

week gap between <strong>of</strong> each were performed), the dose per fraction<br />

was 11.5 Gy. The median followup was 16 months (range 3 44<br />

months). <strong>12</strong> patients received temporary androgen deprivation<br />

starting 29 month before brachytherapy.<br />

Cumulative dosevolume histograms <strong>of</strong> 180 plans were evaluated. The<br />

plans were divided into 3 groups in dependence <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong><br />

implanted active needles: < 16 (1 st group); 16–18 needles (2 nd group);<br />

> 18 (3 rd group). Dose volume parameters for target and quality<br />

indices were calculated. Maximal dose in reference points for urethra<br />

and rectum were determined.<br />

: There was no evidence <strong>of</strong> distant metastases, biochemical or<br />

clinical failure. All 60 patients experienced some degree <strong>of</strong> acute<br />

urinary toxicity, Table 2. However, chronic reactions are absent. The<br />

median first posttreatment PSA was 0.89 ng/ml (range 2.860.04<br />

ng/ml).<br />

<br />

Acute toxicity Number <strong>of</strong><br />

patients<br />

<br />

RTOG grade I 35<br />

RTOG grade II 25<br />

RTOG grade III 0<br />

RTOG grade IV 0<br />

<br />

Table 2. Acute urinary toxicity results.<br />

Mean <strong>of</strong> maximal dose in reference points for urethra was 117.78% –<br />

1 st group, 115.4% – 2 nd , 116.19% – 3 rd group. Mean <strong>of</strong> maximal dose in<br />

reference points for rectum was 82.44% – 1 st group, 82.2% – 2 nd , 84.48%<br />

– 3 rd group. The difference between groups were observed in following<br />

parameters: more needles was implanted in inverse dependence from<br />

volume <strong>of</strong> prostate (Vpr) for three groups (mean Vpr: 81,46 cm 3 , 60,73<br />

cm 3 , 51,9 cm 3 , respectively). There were no significant difference in<br />

other parameters.The number <strong>of</strong> 16–18 implanted needles in most<br />

cases provide optimal dosimetric acceptable volumetric dose<br />

distribution in HDR brachytherapy plan.<br />

: The treatment by interstitial HDR brachytherapy <strong>of</strong><br />

patients with favorable prognostic prostate cancer factors results in<br />

low toxicity and in excellent functional results. Number <strong>of</strong> implanted<br />

needles depends not only <strong>of</strong> prostate volume, but and individual<br />

anatomy <strong>of</strong> patients. By our results the number <strong>of</strong> 16–18 implanted<br />

needles usually provide optimal dosimetric acceptable volumetric<br />

dose distribution in HDR brachytherapy plan.<br />

PO209<br />

RESCUE TREATMENT IN PROSTATE CANCER FOR LOCAL RELAPSE AFTER<br />

RADIOTHERAPY WITH HIGHDOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

K. Quispe Santibáñez 1 , E. Martínez Pérez 1 , J. Pera Fàbregas 1 , C.<br />

Gutiérrez Miguélez 1 , F. Pino Sorroche 2 , M. Ventura Bujalance 1 , J.F.<br />

Suárez Novo 3 , A.M. Boladeras Inglada 1 , F. Ferrer González 1 , F. Guedea<br />

Edo 1<br />

1<br />

Institut Català d'Oncologia, Radiation Oncology, L'Hospitalet de<br />

Llobregat, Spain<br />

2<br />

Institut Català d'Oncologia, Medical Physics, L'Hospitalet de<br />

Llobregat, Spain<br />

3<br />

H. Bellvitge, Urology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain<br />

: To evaluate our institutional results in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

biochemical progression free survival (BPFS), diseasefree survival<br />

(DFS) and toxicity <strong>of</strong> rescue treatment in prostate cancer for local<br />

relapse (RESCPROST) with HighDose Rate brachytherapy (HDRBT).<br />

: Between November 2004 and June 2011, 36<br />

patients with local failure were included in RESCPROST protocol at our<br />

institution. The mean interval between primary and salvage treatment<br />

was 70 months (range 27131). All patients underwent biopsy to<br />

confirm local relapse. Patients were evaluated to rule out metastatic<br />

or regional disease. The mean PSA before salvage treatment was 5.03<br />

ng/ml (CI 95%, 4.06.0). Upon local relapse, <strong>10</strong> patients had<br />

unfavorable Gleason grade 89 and 2 had advanced stage (T3). A total<br />

<strong>of</strong> 35 patients were treated with HDRBT (1 patient was excluded due<br />

to technical problems). The primary treatment was external beam<br />

radiotherapy in 27 cases and low dose rate brachytherapy (LDRBT) in<br />

7. The prescribed dose was 38 Gy in 4 fractions <strong>of</strong> 9.5Gy, delivered in<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 85<br />

two separate implants performed 2 weeks apart. Adjuvant hormonal<br />

therapy was used in 5 patients (14.3%). Patients were followedup<br />

every six months by physical exam and PSA. If Biochemical<br />

progression, complementary exams to rule out distant disease were<br />

performed.<br />

: The survival and the risk <strong>of</strong> local relapse were calculated<br />

using the KaplanMeier method and toxicity was graded using CTCAE<br />

v3.0. Median followup after RESCPROST was 21 months (range, 673).<br />

After 21 months there are <strong>12</strong> patiens at risk <strong>of</strong> failure. Overall and<br />

specific survival: 2 patients died <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer at 20 and 36<br />

moths. There were 2 cases <strong>of</strong> local relapse at 22 and 32 months. The<br />

risk <strong>of</strong> regional relapses was 22 % at 2 years. Three patients developed<br />

distant bone metastasis at <strong>10</strong>, 14 and 43 months, respectively. Three<br />

patients underwent genitourinary (GU) grade 3 toxicity and 1 patient<br />

presented grade 4 toxicity: all <strong>of</strong> these patients had received<br />

permanentseed brachytherapy previously. No cases <strong>of</strong><br />

gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity grade 3 or 4 were observed. The patients<br />

that relapsed were treated with androgen deprivation therapy. Two<br />

patients received chemotherapy and 2 palliative radiotherapy.<br />

: HDRBT yields a good local control for local prostate<br />

cancer recurrence after radiotherapy. Most <strong>of</strong> the relapses ocurr in<br />

bone or in lymph nodes. The greatest GU toxicity was observed in<br />

patients treated initially with LDRBT.<br />

PO2<strong>10</strong><br />

URINARY ENGRAILED2: A NOVEL BIOMARKER FOR FOLLOW UP POST<br />

RADICAL TREATMENT FOR PROSTATE CANCER<br />

S. Javed 1 , E. Chadwick 2 , A. Michael 3 , R. M<strong>org</strong>an 3 , H. Pandha 3 , R.W.<br />

Laing 2 , S.E.M. Langley 1<br />

1<br />

The Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Urology,<br />

Guildford, United Kingdom<br />

2<br />

The Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oncology,<br />

Guildford, United Kingdom<br />

3<br />

Post graduate medical school University <strong>of</strong> Surrey Guildford. U.K.,<br />

Oncology, Guildford, United Kingdom<br />

: Engrailed2 (EN2) is a homeodomaincontaining<br />

transcription factor that is expressed in embryonic development. It is<br />

subsequently reexpressed and secreted by prostate cancer cells but<br />

not by normal prostate cells. These secretions may be detected in a<br />

patient's urine without the need for prior digital rectal examination<br />

(DRE). The presence <strong>of</strong> EN2 in urine is highly predictive <strong>of</strong> prostate<br />

cancer, with a sensitivity <strong>of</strong> 66% and a specificity <strong>of</strong> 88.2%.<br />

: In this pilot study, we randomly selected <strong>10</strong><br />

patients successfully treated with low dose rate brachytherapy from a<br />

prospectively collated database with over 2000 patients. All patients<br />

were hormone naïve with +5 years follow up and a PSA ≤ 0.1 ng/ml.<br />

The EN2 level was measured in patient's firstpass urine sample,<br />

without prior DRE, using ELISA.<br />

: The results showed that 9/<strong>10</strong> patients had an EN2 level<br />

below the standard cut <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> 42.5 ng/ml (range 032.7, median=4.3).<br />

One patient had a raised EN2 level <strong>of</strong> 406 ng/ml, which was<br />

confirmed on a repeat urine sample. To investigate this further, a<br />

diagnostic flexible cystoscopy was performed on this patient.<br />

Interestingly, he was found to have a small asymptomatic superficial<br />

transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) <strong>of</strong> the bladder. EN2 staining <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tissue taken at the time <strong>of</strong> transurethral resection <strong>of</strong> bladder tumour<br />

(TURBT) confirmed that EN2 was present in the TCC specimen, but not<br />

in the normal bladder biopsies. A urine sample following TURBT<br />

showed an EN2 level <strong>of</strong> 0 ng/ml.<br />

: This preliminary study suggests that EN2 may be a<br />

useful surveillance marker in patients who have undergone radical<br />

treatment for prostate cancer. Further studies with larger sample<br />

sizes are currently in progress to further validate this potential in<br />

patients who have undergone various other forms <strong>of</strong> radical<br />

treatment. Secondly as EN2 is also secreted in TCC <strong>of</strong> the bladder,<br />

studies are under way to validate its diagnostic potential in TCC <strong>of</strong> the<br />

bladder.<br />

PO211<br />

PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY USING AN AUTOMATIC SEED<br />

AFTERLOADER: PRELIMINARY EXPERIENCE IN <strong>10</strong>37 PATIENTS<br />

P. Pommier 1 , M. Delannes 2 , L. Thomas 3 , S. ServagiVernat 4 , G.<br />

Crehange 5 , D. Williaume 6 , C. Llacer 7 , M. Untereiner 8 , A. Bajard 9<br />

1<br />

Centre Léon Bérard, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Lyon,<br />

France<br />

2<br />

Centre Claudius Regaud, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Toulouse, France<br />

3<br />

Institut Bergognié, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Bordeaux,<br />

France<br />

4<br />

CHU Besançon, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Besançon, France<br />

5<br />

Centre GF Leclerc, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Dijon, France<br />

6<br />

Centre E Marquis, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Rennes, France<br />

7<br />

Centre Valdorel, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Montpellier,<br />

France<br />

8<br />

Centre F Baclesse, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Eschsur<br />

Alzette, Luxembourg<br />

9<br />

Centre L Bérard, Department <strong>of</strong> Biostatistics, Lyon, France<br />

: To prospectively assess toxicity outcome in<br />

prostate exclusive brachytherapy with the use <strong>of</strong> an automatic seed<br />

afterloader (seedSelectron, Nucletron R )<br />

: Since November 2002, 1156 patients treated<br />

with the seedselectron for a localized prostate adenocarcinoma have<br />

been included in a prospective multicentric survey database (7<br />

centers in France and 1 in Luxembourg). Data for <strong>10</strong>35 pts with at<br />

least immediate toxicity data are reported. Median age was 66 y. [46 <br />

80]. Mean PSA value was 6.7 ng/l (SD 2.3); 76% were classified as T1C,<br />

19.7% as T2a and 1.1% as T2B (T1a in 1 and T3a in 1 pt); Gleason Score<br />

was < 6 in 84.5%; 7=3+4 in 15.3% (4+3 in 2; 8 in 1 pts).<br />

RESULTS: For the whole population, a urinary obstruction occurred in<br />

31 patients (3%), immediately after the removal <strong>of</strong> the urinary<br />

catheter in <strong>12</strong>; within the first week in 5; within the first 8 weeks in 7<br />

and after 3 mo. in 7 pts. A urinary resection was performed in 6 pts.<br />

The maximal urinary toxicity CTCv3 grade was quoted as 3 in 4.5%; 2<br />

in 39% and 01 in 53%. The maximal IPPS value (available in 931<br />

patients) was > 25 in 3.4%; 20


S86 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

: The mean age was 63.93 years (4488); means pretreatment<br />

PSA was 6.34 ng/mL (0,67 33.09); 88.20% <strong>of</strong> patients ha initial PSA<br />

less <strong>10</strong> ng/mL; 83.28 had Gleason score


S88 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

regular seeds migrated (were lost) out <strong>of</strong> the pelvis compared to 1<br />

AnchorSeed (8/114 vs. 1/<strong>12</strong>6 p=0.015)<br />

: Coated AnchorSeeds were found to have a significant<br />

anchoring effect which was effective in reducing the number <strong>of</strong> apical<br />

seeds that were lost from the pelvis.<br />

PO218<br />

<strong>12</strong>5I BRACHYTHERAPY AS A CURE FOR EARLY STAGE PROSTATE CANCER<br />

IN PATIENTS UNDER 65 YEARS OF AGE<br />

T. Palloni 1 , F.P. Mangiacotti 2 , A. Petrucci 2 , G. Bakacs 3 , M. Martini 3 , R.<br />

Consorti 2 , P. Soldini 1 , D. Cuccoli 4 , M. Sereni 5 , M.A. Mirri 1<br />

1<br />

San Filippo Neri Hospital, Radiotherapy, Roma, Italy<br />

2<br />

San Filippo Neri Hospital, Medical Physics, Roma, Italy<br />

3<br />

San Filippo Neri Hospital, Urology, Roma, Italy<br />

4<br />

San Filippo Neri Hospital, Anesthesia, Roma, Italy<br />

5<br />

San Filippo Neri Hospital, Surgical Unit, Roma, Italy<br />

<br />

: Nowadays, greater public awareness <strong>of</strong> prostate<br />

cancer and the implementation <strong>of</strong> routine PSA screening have resulted<br />

in a decrease in patient age <strong>of</strong> the time <strong>of</strong> first diagnosis 1 . Young age<br />

has traditionally been viewed as a negative prognostic factor 2 . Many<br />

physicians believed that younger patients (pts) are better suited for<br />

surgery rather than radiation as primary treatment 2,3 . However, data<br />

literature supporting this traditional view are very limited 456789 .<br />

Longterm results <strong>10</strong> show that <strong>12</strong>5 I BT represents an effective and safe<br />

treatment with satisfying results in terms <strong>of</strong> biochemical progression<br />

(BP) and <strong>of</strong> overall survival, also in hormone naïve pts ≤60 years (yrs)<br />

with freedom from biochemical failure (FFbF) 92% at 8 yrs 411 . In<br />

addition literature reports that younger pts tolerate BT well, with<br />

favorable quality <strong>of</strong> life and low morbidity even in late follow up<br />

(FUP) <strong>12</strong>13 . It appears evident that the efficacy and morbidity <strong>of</strong> BT,<br />

regardless <strong>of</strong> patient’s age 6 , are strongly correlated to patient<br />

selection, multidisciplinary management and implant quality 1415 . The<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to report our results in pts younger than 65<br />

years treated with <strong>12</strong>5 I BT.<br />

: <strong>12</strong>5 I BT was proposed to pts with PSA ≤ <strong>10</strong>,<br />

Gleason Score (GS) ≤ 7 (3+4), T1T2 stage, good urinary functionality<br />

and prostate volume ≤ 55 gr 16 . The prescription dose was 145 Gy. One<br />

month after the implant, the pts underwent CTbased dosimetry: a<br />

D90 (the dose delivered to 90% <strong>of</strong> the prostate volume) ≥ 140 Gy was<br />

considered the measure <strong>of</strong> good implant quality 17 . We recorded the<br />

following data: post implant dosimetric parameters, acute and late<br />

genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, erectile function<br />

(EF), urinary continence preservation and PSA levels.<br />

: Between February 2009 and December 2011, 41 pts<br />

underwent the <strong>12</strong>5 I BT in our institution, 19 <strong>of</strong> which younger than 65<br />

yrs with a median age <strong>of</strong> 56 yrs. In the cohort <strong>of</strong> younger pts the mean<br />

prostate volume was 35,5 cm 3 and the 1month mean D90 was 149,7<br />

Gy . At a median FUP <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>,5 mts, the toxicity was low with no acute<br />

or late urinary obstruction. The toxicity was 47,4% and <strong>10</strong>,5% grade 1<br />

(G1) and grade 2 (G2) acute GU, respectively, and only 5,3%<br />

developed G1 acute GI toxicity; 31,6% and <strong>10</strong>,5% <strong>of</strong> pts presented G1<br />

and G2 late GU toxicity. At the moment urinary continence and EF are<br />

preserved in the whole group. All pts are free from BP and local<br />

recurrence with mean PSA values reduced <strong>of</strong> 74,2%, 85,2%, 73,0% and<br />

89,6% at 3, 9, 18 and 24 months, respectively.<br />

: Our data confirm <strong>12</strong>5 I BT to be an effective cure also in<br />

younger than 65 yrs pts. <strong>12</strong>5 I BT is particularly suitable for men<br />

motivated to maintain EF, urinary continence and asking to rapidly<br />

return to normal work and social life. Outcome seems strongly related<br />

to a multidisciplinary approach, to high implant quality and technical<br />

ability <strong>of</strong> dedicated team, as well as to the selection <strong>of</strong> the patients.<br />

PO219<br />

IMPLEMENTATION OF INTRAOPERATIVE ULTRASOUND BASED REALTIME<br />

ADAPTIVE PLANNING FOR PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

D. D'Souza 1 , N. Patil 1 , H. Mosalaei 2 , M. Mulligan 2 , K. Jordan 2 , C.<br />

Lewis 2 , T. Murray 3 , L. Derrah 3 , G. Bauman 1<br />

1<br />

The London Regional Cancer Program, Radiation Oncology, London<br />

Ontario, Canada<br />

2<br />

The London Regional Cancer Program, Medical Physics, London<br />

Ontario, Canada<br />

3<br />

The London Regional Cancer Program, Nursing, London Ontario,<br />

Canada<br />

: Improvements in the quality <strong>of</strong> radiation<br />

delivered for several sites has been achieved by the use <strong>of</strong> dynamic<br />

planning. This is particularly relevant to prostate brachytherapy (PB)<br />

with <strong>org</strong>an swelling and movement, difficulty in reproducing the pre<br />

plan positioning <strong>of</strong> needles and seed placement. However such an<br />

approach can be resourceintensive.<br />

: This study prospectively evaluated the effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> implementing intraoperative realtime adaptive planning for PB<br />

with respect to implant quality and procedure time. From Jul/<strong>10</strong> –<br />

Nov/11, 22 patients underwent I<strong>12</strong>5 PB using IBTBebig loose seeds<br />

and Mick applicator. Intraoperative realtime adaptive planning was<br />

performed using Variseed 8.0 and evaluated with ultrasound.<br />

However, we compared the standard dosimetric parameters using Day<br />

30 CT with 23 patients undergoing I<strong>12</strong>5 PB using stranded seeds using<br />

traditional preplanning during the same time period.<br />

:<br />

Median Preplan (n=23) Intraoperative (n=22)<br />

TRUS Volume (cc) 30.5 (range: 20 50) 34.0 (range: 15 57)<br />

Post plan V<strong>10</strong>0 (%) 91.5 (range: 75 99) 95.1 (range: 86 <strong>10</strong>0)<br />

Post plan V200 (%) 16.7 (range: 9 35) 34.5 (range: 13 63)<br />

Post plan D90 (Gy) 141.9 ( range: 116 – 155) 165.4 (range: 132 216)<br />

The median procedure time was 158 minutes (range <strong>10</strong>0225).<br />

However there was a significant reduction in time from the 1 st<br />

quartile (205) to the last quartile (<strong>12</strong>0).<br />

: Intraoperative ultrasound based realtime adaptive<br />

planning for PB is associated with improvement in standard implant<br />

quality parameters compared to preplanning. Acute toxicity is<br />

favourable, however longer followup is required to assess clinically<br />

relevant outcomes.<br />

PO220<br />

DOSE ESCALATION TO 160 GY IN I<strong>12</strong>5 PROSTATE IMPLANTS. EARLY<br />

CLINICAL RESULTS<br />

A. Tormo 1 , E. Collado 1 , S. Roldán 1 , F.J. Celada 1 , J.C. Morales 1 , V.<br />

Carmona 2 , M.C. GarcíaMora 1 , O. Pons 1 , F. Lliso 2 , J. PérezCalatayud 2<br />

1 Hospital La Fe, Radiation Oncology, Valencia, Spain<br />

2 Hospital La Fe, Radiation OncologyPhysics, Valencia, Spain<br />

: The aim <strong>of</strong> this dose escalating study (from<br />

D90>144 Gy to D90>160 Gy) is to analyze the biochemical recurrence<br />

free survival (bRFS) and toxicity pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer patients<br />

treated with I<strong>12</strong>5 seeds implant.<br />

: From January´08 to December´<strong>10</strong> 219 low<br />

risk and one factor intermediaterisk patients were chosen for 160 Gy<br />

I<strong>12</strong>5 therapies. Previous MRI, urinary flowmetry an IPSS questionnaire<br />

were realized. Using realtime intraoperative interactive planning,<br />

prescribed dose was 160 Gy, keeping the same urethral and rectal<br />

constraints as when 144 Gy was the prescribed dose. One month post<br />

implant CT and MRI were realized for postplanning. Median age was<br />

68 years old (range 4179), median PSA 7.7 ng/ml (range 233) and<br />

median Gleason 6. 79 patients were treated with hormone therapy<br />

(media duration 4 months). Median US prostate volume was 35 cc<br />

(range <strong>10</strong>72). Retrospectively maximal acute and chronic toxicity,<br />

using CTCv4.0 and RTOG scales, and bRFS, using Phoenix definition,<br />

were evaluated.<br />

: The incidence <strong>of</strong> grade 34 acute toxicity was 2% (6 patients<br />

required urinary catheter because <strong>of</strong> acute retention, all solved with<br />

medical treatment). No grade 34 chronic toxicity was observed. 74%<br />

<strong>of</strong> patients remained potent. 2% patients presented biochemical<br />

failure with negative complementary exams, including transperineal<br />

prostate saturation biopsy.<br />

: Dose escalation to 160 Gy in I<strong>12</strong>5 prostate implants<br />

don’t give rise more toxicity than 144 Gy. Clinical results are good,<br />

but with a short followup.<br />

PO221<br />

HDR BRACHYTHERAPY BOOST AND EXTERNAL RADIOTHERAPY FOR<br />

UNFAVORABLE PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS<br />

I. Monteiro Grillo 1 , F. Pina 1 , V. Mendonça 1 , A. Amado 1 , J. Melich<br />

Cerveira 2 , G. Marcelino 1 , P. Marques Vidal 3<br />

1 University Hospital <strong>of</strong> Santa Maria, Radiotherapy, Lisboa, Portugal<br />

2 Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 89<br />

3<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Social and Preventive Medicine, University Hospital <strong>of</strong><br />

Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland<br />

: To evaluate the outcome <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer<br />

patients treated with a combination <strong>of</strong> HDR <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> boost<br />

(HDRBT) and 3D conformal external pelvic radiotherapy (EBRT) in a<br />

dose escalation study.<br />

: 162 patients were followed between<br />

November 2004 and December 20<strong>10</strong> . Two different dose escalation<br />

groups were done: group 1 (n= 92), 1 fraction HDR boost (9<strong>10</strong> Gy )<br />

followed by EBRT (60 Gy in 6 weeks) – BED: 203216 Gy and group 2<br />

(n=70): 2 fraction HDR boost (1819 Gy), 6 hours interval between<br />

fractions, followed by EBRT (46 Gy in 4.5 weeks) BED: 233.3 247 Gy;<br />

116 pts (71.6%) received concomitant androgen deprivation. Patients<br />

were classified according to the MSKCC criteria into high (N=137) and<br />

intermediate (N=25) risk. Phoenix biochemical failure definition was<br />

used. Toxicity was scored by Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria<br />

(RTOG)<br />

: The mean followup was 41 (range 784) months. The 7 years<br />

cancerspecific and overall survival was <strong>10</strong>0% an 92%, respectively.<br />

The 7 years actuarial biochemical control rate was 89% and <strong>10</strong>0% for<br />

group 1 and 2, respectively. One patient from group 1 and two<br />

patients from group 2 never reached a low nadir. Two patients<br />

developed distant metastases <strong>12</strong> and 16 months after the treatment.<br />

In a multivariate Coxregression analysis neither treatment nor risk<br />

group (intermediate vs. high risk) were associated with increased risk<br />

for biochemical failure. The RTOG grade 3 genitourinary early toxicity<br />

was 1.0% and 8.5% while gastrointestinal/genitourinary late toxicity<br />

was 7.6% and 1.4% for group 1 and 2, respectively<br />

: HDR BT boost followed by EBRT appears to be a safe,<br />

feasible and effective treatment for patients with unfavorable<br />

localized prostate cancer. This study shows a beneficial effect on<br />

biochemical control in group 2 pts, however without statistical<br />

significance. Higher radiation doses (BED 233.3247 Gy) do not seem<br />

to carry extra toxicity.<br />

PO222<br />

A NEW DIMENSION TO THE TREATMENT OF LOCALIZED PROSTATE<br />

CANCER: 4D BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

S. Langley 1 , E. Chadwick 2 , S. Javed 1 , R.W. Laing 2<br />

1<br />

Royal Surrey County Hospital, Urology, Guildford, United Kingdom<br />

2<br />

Royal Surrey County Hospital, St Lukes Cancer Centre, Guildford,<br />

United Kingdom<br />

: LDR prostate brachytherapy has been performed<br />

at our centre for the last <strong>12</strong> years. Data for patients have been<br />

collected on a bespoke, prospective database. During this time, we<br />

have made significant modifications to the technique, culminating in a<br />

new onestage realtime procedure, which utilizes the benefits <strong>of</strong><br />

stranded and loose seeds. After an initial learning curve, data for<br />

cohorts <strong>of</strong> patients from sequential techniques are compared here.<br />

: In 1999, implants were performed using the<br />

Seattle technique, with loose seeds in a modified uniform<br />

distribution. From 2005, seeds were implanted as a combination <strong>of</strong><br />

stranded seeds placed peripherally, and loose seeds placed centrally,<br />

with a Mick applicator. This was termed the 'Guildford Hybrid<br />

technique'. By 2007, implants were still preplanned, but realtime<br />

planning allowed intraoperative plan modifications, 'Realtime<br />

optimization'. In 2008, a nomogram for seed and strand ordering was<br />

developed so that implants could be performed as a 1stage<br />

procedure. All planning now takes place intraoperatively. The plans<br />

are developed iteratively, in response to realtime dosimetric<br />

feedback. This technique is termed '4D <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>'.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

:<br />

The table describes demographics and dosimetry. The D90, %D90 (D90<br />

as a percentage <strong>of</strong> the prescribed dose) and V<strong>10</strong>0 were all<br />

significantly higher for the three modifications to the procedure<br />

compared with the original Seattle series (p


S90 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

: Between July 1999 up to December 2011 446<br />

patients with low and intermediate risk prostate cancer were treated<br />

with permanent seed implantation. <strong>12</strong>8 patients received Palladium<br />

<strong>10</strong>3, 329 received Iodine<strong>12</strong>5. The median follow up for the entire<br />

group is 48 months (mean 53.36 months, min 1/ max 144 months).<br />

Pretreatment low risk criteria were as follows: PSA level < <strong>10</strong> ng/ml,<br />

Gleason score < 7, intermediate risk: PSA level ><strong>10</strong> < 20 ng/ml or<br />

Gleason 7. In exceptional cases we also treated patients with high risk<br />

features (PSA level > 20 ng/ml or Gleason > 8).<br />

In order to exclude patients with extraprostatic disease, between<br />

2002 and 2004 we routinely performed a MRT +/ endorectal coil.<br />

Since 2004 we only recommended pretreatment erMRT for patients<br />

with higher risk for stage T3 tumours (patients in the intermediate<br />

risk group, with positive biopsies in both prostate lobes or high risk<br />

patients). To evaluate side effects, validated questionnaires, as IPSS,<br />

EORTC QLQC30(+3), IIEF 5/15 and individual parameters like<br />

maximum urinary flow rates and residual urine volume were assessed<br />

before implantation and every three month within the first two years.<br />

Irritative and obstructive interferences were monitored and analysed.<br />

For quality assurance four weeks after the procedure a postplan was<br />

calculated in all cases.<br />

: Every procedure was performed without major<br />

complications. Mild to moderate acute genitourinary side effects<br />

included obstructive and/or irritative symptoms. Rectal side effects<br />

like mild to moderate proctitis also occurred, but gradually resolved<br />

in most patients. Biochemical relapse free survival (bNED) according<br />

to nadir +2 ng/ml for the entire cohort is 93.73%. Low / intermediate<br />

/ high risk patients represented a bNED <strong>of</strong> 92.3, 97.7 and 97%<br />

respectively (figure 1).<br />

: Prostate brachytherapy with Palladium<strong>10</strong>3 and Iodine<br />

<strong>12</strong>5 permanent implantation is a feasible, minimal invasive, highly<br />

effective procedure for curative treatment for low and intermediate<br />

risk prostate cancer.<br />

PO224<br />

LONG TERM EXPERIENCE OF HDR BOOST FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE<br />

USING INVERSE PLANNING WITH SIMULATED ANNEALING<br />

E. Vigneault 1 , P. Despré 1 , A.G. Martin 1 , W. Foster 1 , S. Aubin 1 , L.<br />

Beaulieu 1<br />

1<br />

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec L'HôtelDieu de Québec,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Quebec, Canada<br />

: The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is to report PSA failure<br />

free survival (Phoenix) in localized prostate cancer patients treated<br />

with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by HDR (high<br />

dose rate) boost using inverse planning with simulated annealing<br />

(IPSA).<br />

: Since 1999, 731 prostate cancer patients<br />

were treated with 4044 Gy <strong>of</strong> EBRT followed by HDR boost using<br />

inverse planning with simulated annealing (IPSA). The HDR boost<br />

evolved from 3 fractions (6 Gy X 3) technique to two fractions ( 95<strong>10</strong><br />

Gy X 2) technique and more recently in a one fraction technique (15<br />

Gy X 1). Patients were followed prospectively. Only patients with a<br />

minimum followup <strong>of</strong> 6 months were analyzed and presented in this<br />

study. We define the PSA failure free survival using Phoenix<br />

definition. Chisquare test was used to compare PSA failure free<br />

survival between the three risk groups and different dose / fraction<br />

regimens.<br />

: Out <strong>of</strong> the 731 patients, 640 had a minimum followup <strong>of</strong> 6<br />

months. Pretreatment PSA was< <strong>10</strong> ng/ml in 75% <strong>of</strong> patients, <strong>10</strong>20<br />

ng/ml in 22% and > 20 ng/ml in 3% respectively. The mean age <strong>of</strong><br />

patients at presentation was 65.9 year with an average clinical follow<br />

up <strong>of</strong> 36 months (range 6130 months). 82% <strong>of</strong> patients presented with<br />

a clinical stage T1T2a, 16% T2bc and 2 % > T3. 18% had a Gleason<br />

Score ≤ 6 /<strong>10</strong> and 75% Gleason score 7 and 7% Gleason score ≥ 8. 59%<br />

were low risk, 39% intermediate risk and 7% high risk prostate cancer<br />

patients. In our population 80% did not received androgen deprivation<br />

therapy (ADT) while 20% received short / long term (high risk patient)<br />

ADT. For the whole group <strong>of</strong> patients the 5 year PSA failure free<br />

survival (Phoenix) is 98.7%. The 5 year PSA failure free survival was<br />

not statistically different between the three risk group (low,<br />

intermediate and high) and between the different HDR<br />

dose/fractionation used.<br />

: The use <strong>of</strong> HDR brachytherapy boost in localized<br />

prostate cancer gives impressive 5 year PSA failure free survival using<br />

Phoenix definition even in intermediate and high risk group. These<br />

results are comparable with other single institution series. These<br />

excellent results should be compared to high dose EBRT in a<br />

multicentre Phase III study.<br />

PO225<br />

PLANNED TURP PRIOR TO LDR PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY DOES NOT<br />

CAUSE INCONTINENCE<br />

E. Chadwick 1 , S. Javed 2 , R.W. Laing 1 , S.E.M. Langley 2<br />

1<br />

Royal Surrey County Hospital, St Lukes Cancer Centre, Guildford,<br />

United Kingdom<br />

2<br />

Royal Surrey County Hospital, Urology, Guildford, United Kingdom<br />

: Historically, patients with a high IPSS (>15), or a<br />

recent transurethral resection <strong>of</strong> the prostate (TURP), have been<br />

excluded from brachytherapy due to concerns regarding urinary<br />

incontinence, urinary outflow obstruction and the ability to achieve<br />

acceptable dosimetry. However, since 2006, a limited TURP/bladder<br />

neck resection (BNR) has been <strong>of</strong>fered to patients with significant<br />

obstructive symptoms (poor urinary flow or poor bladder emptying)<br />

before their implant. The dosimetry, subsequent urinary function and<br />

biochemical relapse free survival (bRFS) are described here.<br />

: 65 Preimplant brachytherapy patients with<br />

at least 32 months follow up, with obstructive ur<strong>of</strong>lowmetry or large<br />

postvoid residuals, together with a high bladder neck due to median<br />

lobe hypertrophy on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) were <strong>of</strong>fered a BNR<br />

/ limited TURP 6 weeks before their implant, as these patients are<br />

known to experience significant postimplant urinary toxicity. 9<br />

patients received neoadjuvant hormones and 4 patients received<br />

EBRT in combination with their implant. IPSS scores were recorded<br />

prospectively on a bespoke database. A questionnaire based on the<br />

Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire was<br />

sent to patients retrospectively to assess incontinence, described<br />

below:<br />

Over the past 4 weeks, how <strong>of</strong>ten have you leaked urine?<br />

Which <strong>of</strong> the following best describes your urinary control during<br />

the last 4 weeks?<br />

How many pads or adult nappies per day did you usually use to<br />

control leakage during the last 4 weeks?<br />

: The mean follow up was 47 months. The 4 year bRFS was<br />

97%. The mean postimplant D90 as a percentage <strong>of</strong> the prescribed<br />

dose was 1<strong>12</strong>%. The mean V<strong>10</strong>0 and V150 were 94 and 56Gy respectively.<br />

The mean urethral V150 was 6%.<br />

Urinary morbidity is described in the table below. 1 patient developed<br />

a urethral stricture at 18 months. No patient went into urinary<br />

retention or required intermittent selfcatheterisation. The mean<br />

score for the EPIC incontinence domains was 93% and in particular no<br />

one was using pads.<br />

Months FU<br />

PreBNR /<br />

Urinary morbidity<br />

<strong>12</strong> 24 36<br />

TURP<br />

Mild IPSS 08 55% 53% 66% 77%<br />

Moderate IPSS 916 35% 41% 25% 20%<br />

Severe IPSS 1735 9% 7% 9% 3%<br />

: A limited TURP / BNR is a procedure which can be<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 91<br />

performed on patients with urinary outflow obstruction who might not<br />

otherwise have been <strong>of</strong>fered brachytherapy, and is preferable to a<br />

postimplant TURP when tissue healing is less predictable and patients<br />

will have inevitably endured significant urinary symptoms prior to<br />

surgery. A preimplant TURP does not cause urinary incontinence and<br />

is associated with low urinary morbidity. The dosimetry and bRFS in<br />

this series demonstrate that the oncological management is not<br />

compromised.<br />

PO226<br />

INCORPORATING EDEMA IN PROSTATE SEED IMPLANT DOSIMETRY USING<br />

A CLINICALLYINFORMED EDEMA MODEL<br />

D. Liu 1 , T. Monajemi 2 , R. Sloboda 1<br />

1<br />

Cross Cancer Institute, Medical Physics Department, Edmonton,<br />

Canada<br />

2<br />

McGill University Health Center, Medical Physics Unit, Montreal,<br />

Canada<br />

: To calculate preplan and postimplant dosimetric<br />

quantifiers for prostate seed implants using a new spatially<br />

anisotropic linearly timeresolving edema model.<br />

: <strong>10</strong> patients treated with I<strong>12</strong>5 permanent<br />

prostate brachytherapy were studied retrospectively. On preplan US<br />

and postimplant CT scans, dose distributions incorporating edema<br />

were calculated (Med Phys 2011, 38:22892298) and compared with<br />

TG43 point source calculations. The edema model parameters<br />

(magnitude = 0.2 and resolution time = 28 days) were chosen based on<br />

previously published results (<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>10</strong>, 9:354361).<br />

Dosimetric quantifiers were calculated for the preplan PTV and the<br />

postimplant prostate using CERR, an opensourced radiotherapy<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware. For one preplan case, representative edema effects were<br />

also determined for Pd<strong>10</strong>3 and Cs131 implants using the same seed<br />

distribution with adjusted source strength.<br />

: The dose when incorporating edema was consistently lower<br />

than the TG43 dose. The relative error expressed as a percent (RE%)<br />

was calculated between the two dose distributions. The maximum RE%<br />

within the structure boundary was 2.7. The mean RE% was 2.02<br />

[range: 1.95 – 2.<strong>12</strong>] for the preplan PTV and 2.<strong>10</strong> [range: 2.04 – 2.17]<br />

for the postimplant prostate. There was no significant difference in<br />

mean RE% between the prostate and its subregions (i.e. urethra, near<br />

bladder, prostate surface). The ~2% reduction in dose when<br />

accounting for edema was similarly reflected in several dose metrics,<br />

as shown in the table. Postimplant results exhibited similar<br />

differences. All differences in dose metrics were found to be<br />

correlated with prostate volume (R 2 > 0.6; p < 0.01).<br />

Preplan dose metric Incorporating edema TG43<br />

Mean dose 282 Gy 286 Gy<br />

D90 188 Gy 192 Gy<br />

V200 27.8 % 29.7 %<br />

V150 69.3 % 72.4 %<br />

V<strong>10</strong>0 (145 Gy) 99.6 % 99.7 %<br />

The dosimetric differences were greater for Pd<strong>10</strong>3 and Cs131<br />

compared to I<strong>12</strong>5, as shown in the DVH figure. The mean RE% were<br />

2.0, 6.0, and 7.5 for I<strong>12</strong>5, Pd<strong>10</strong>3, and Cs131, respectively.<br />

: The dosimetric effects <strong>of</strong> edema for <strong>10</strong> I<strong>12</strong>5 implants<br />

were determined using an anisotropic edema model with clinically<br />

based parameters. The mean dose was ~2% lower when accounting for<br />

edema and this difference was observed with little variation across<br />

different regions <strong>of</strong> the prostate, between pre and postplans, and<br />

between patients. Similar reductions were observed for the mean<br />

dose, D90, V200, and V150. The effects <strong>of</strong> edema were substantially<br />

greater for Pd<strong>10</strong>3 and Cs131 compared to I<strong>12</strong>5.<br />

PO227<br />

C4 MARKERS FOR MRIBASED PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

S. Frank 1 , T. Madden 2 , D.A. Swanson 3 , K. Martirosyan 4 , R.<br />

Uthamanthil 5 , J. Stafford 6 , M. Gagea 5 , T.J. Pugh 1 , R. Kudchadker 7 ,<br />

M.J. Johansen 2<br />

1<br />

U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, Houston TX,<br />

USA<br />

2<br />

U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Experimental Therapeutics,<br />

Houston TX, USA<br />

3<br />

U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Urology, Houston TX, USA<br />

4<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Texas Brownsville, Chemical and Biomolecular Imaging,<br />

Houston TX, USA<br />

5<br />

MD Anderson Cancer Center, Veterinary Medicine and Surgery,<br />

Houston TX, USA<br />

6<br />

MD Anderson Cancer Center, Imaging Physics, Houston TX, USA<br />

7<br />

MD Anderson Cancer Center, Radiation Physics, Houston TX, USA<br />

: To establish the invivo safety and efficacy <strong>of</strong> a<br />

permanently implantable cobalt chloride complex contrast agent (C4)<br />

to localize radioactive seeds for MRIbased prostate brachytherapy.<br />

: To support evaluation <strong>of</strong> the extent <strong>of</strong><br />

complexation and stability <strong>of</strong> the complexed material, a LC/MS<br />

method using diethyl dithiocarbamate (DDTC) derivitization quantified<br />

free cobalt in C4 solutions and in plasma spiked with C4. The extent<br />

<strong>of</strong> complexation and stability <strong>of</strong> C4 complexes in water and plasma<br />

were then evaluated over 5 days at 37°C. Ninemicroliter doses<br />

(equivalent to leakage from <strong>12</strong>0 C4 MRI markers in a man) <strong>of</strong> vehicle<br />

control, 1% and <strong>10</strong>% C4 solution, were injected into the prostates <strong>of</strong><br />

male SpragueDawley rats via laparotomy. Cobalt disposition in<br />

plasma, tissues, feces and urine was evaluated along with both gross<br />

and microscopic evidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>org</strong>an toxicity. C4 MRI markers with I<strong>12</strong>5<br />

stranded seeds were inserted into both prostate phantoms and an in<br />

vivo canine prostate for seed localization under 1.5 and 3T MRI (TR<br />

1500/TE 30).<br />

: At physiologic pH in plasma, the C4 solutions were found to<br />

contain a consistently low amount <strong>of</strong> free cobalt over the 5day period<br />

thereby demonstrating nearly complete complexation formation with<br />

available cobalt in the solutions. The mean free cobalt measured on<br />

Day 0, 2, 4 and 5 ranged from 6.08.8%. The pharmacokinetics<br />

analyses revealed no treatmentrelated morbidity or mortality among<br />

60 rats. Cobalt was detected in the plasma only transiently (at 560<br />

minutes, mean peak concentration 1.40 g/mL); in the urine (60<br />

minutes6 hours, mean peak concentration 11.6 g/mL at 6 hours);<br />

and in the feces (3.28 g/g at 624 hours), but only in the highdose<br />

(<strong>10</strong>% C4) group. Findings confirmed the expected dual renalhepatic<br />

elimination <strong>of</strong> this compound. Toxicity data demonstrating the rapid<br />

elimination <strong>of</strong> cobalt in animals administered the C4 solution. No<br />

adverse clinical signs and no histopathologic lesions were noted in any<br />

dose group. The C4 MRI markers could be visualized under both 1.5T<br />

and 3T MRI and localize the implanted seeds invivo.<br />

: In summary, these data demonstrate the formulation<br />

used for the C4 MRI Marker contains complexes as identified. <strong>10</strong>% C4 is<br />

the noadverseeffectslevel in this setting and is therefore expected<br />

to be safe as an MRI marker for prostate cancer treatment. The C4<br />

MRI marker was able to localize implanted seeds under 1.5 and 3T T1<br />

weighted MRI in phantoms and within invivo canine prostates.<br />

PO228<br />

PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF PHARMACOLOGIC PENILE REHABIL<br />

ITATION FOLLOWING PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

T.J. Pugh 1 , D.A. Swanson 2 , R.J. Kudchadker 3 , T.L. Bruno 3 , M.F.<br />

Munsell 4 , S.J. Frank 1<br />

1<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology,<br />

Houston TX, USA<br />

2<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Urology, Houston<br />

TX, USA<br />

3<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Radiation Physics,


S92 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Houston TX, USA<br />

4 University <strong>of</strong> Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Biostatistics,<br />

Houston TX, USA<br />

: To describe patient reported sexual quality <strong>of</strong> life<br />

in men treated with prostate brachytherapy and prophylactic<br />

tadalafil.<br />

: Between 20052011, we prospectively<br />

measured outcomes reported by 237 patients before and after<br />

prostate brachytherapy monotherapy. All patients were prescribed<br />

tadalafil <strong>10</strong> mg tablets by mouth twice weekly starting 2 weeks prior<br />

to brachytherapy implant. No patient had previously used a 5<br />

phosphodiesterase inhibitor for erectile enhancement. The expanded<br />

prostate index composite (EPIC) was completed prior to any<br />

intervention (baseline) and at each followup assessment. The change<br />

in EPIC sexual domain, sexual function, and sexual bother scores was<br />

calculated. Preservation <strong>of</strong> potency was assessed through subgroup<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> men declaring 'erections firm enough for intercourse' at<br />

baseline versus posttreatment evaluation.<br />

: The mean sexual domain, sexual function, and sexual bother<br />

scores at baseline were 57.4, 50.9, and 72.8 respectively. Sexual<br />

domain and sexual function scores decreased significantly from<br />

baseline at each time interval assessed (Range 148 months). The<br />

mean change in sexual domain and sexual function score from<br />

baseline to 24 months was 5.5 (p = 0.013) and 6.1 (p = 0.007)<br />

respectively. Sexual bother scores were not significantly different at<br />

24 months. The mean change in sexual bother score was 4.4 (p =<br />

0.219). Sixtythree percent <strong>of</strong> men reported full potency at baseline.<br />

At 24 month followup, 75% <strong>of</strong> men with baseline potency reported<br />

potency preservation.<br />

: This is the first ever report <strong>of</strong> prophylactic 5<br />

phosphodiesterase inhibitor use for preservation <strong>of</strong> erectile function<br />

in men treated with prostate brachytherapy. These results compare<br />

favorably to published outcomes with brachytherapy alone or<br />

alternative management strategies for localized prostate cancer. A<br />

randomized trial <strong>of</strong> prophylactic tadalafil is warranted.<br />

PO229<br />

ACUTE AND CHRONIC TOXICITY ASSOCIATED WITH THREE HIGHDOSE<br />

RATE BRACHYTHERAPY MONOTHERAPY SCHEDULES<br />

J. Dilworth 1 , H. Ye 1 , M. Ghilezan 1 , M. Wallace 1 , C. Shah 1 , D. Krauss 1 ,<br />

G. Gustafson 1 , A. Martinez 1<br />

1 William Beaumont Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Royal Oak, USA<br />

: To report the acute and chronic toxicity pr<strong>of</strong>iles<br />

associated with three highdoserate brachytherapy (HDR) regimens<br />

used as monotherapy for favorablerisk prostate cancer.<br />

: 482 patients with T stage T2b or less, Gleason<br />

score 7 or less, and pretreatment PSA value 18 ng/mL or less were<br />

treated with HDR. 317 patients received 38 Gy in four fractions; 72<br />

received 24 Gy in two fractions; 93 received 27 Gy in two fractions.<br />

Chisquare, ttest, ROC, and univariate analyses were conducted to<br />

compare patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. Acute and<br />

chronic toxicities were defined as those occurring within or after the<br />

first six months following treatment, respectively, and graded using<br />

the CTCAE, v3.0.<br />

: Median followup was 3 years for all patients. Clinical<br />

outcomes were similar among groups, with 3yr actuarial rates <strong>of</strong> 91%<br />

(biochemical failurefree survival, p=0.76), 99% (overall survival,<br />

p=0.83), and <strong>10</strong>0% (causespecific survival). Acute and chronic<br />

toxicities are listed in Table 1. All acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities<br />

were similar among groups. The majority <strong>of</strong> acute genitourinary (GU)<br />

symptoms was similar among groups, with urinary retention and<br />

urinary incontinence rates being higher in the 38 Gy group. All chronic<br />

GU toxicities were similar among groups. The majority <strong>of</strong> chronic GI<br />

toxicities was similar among groups, with chronic diarrhea being lower<br />

in the 38 Gy group. Nine patients (2%) developed urethral strictures<br />

requiring surgical dilation. Patients receiving prebrachytherapy<br />

hormonal therapy (HT) experienced higher acute GI and GU toxicities<br />

(20% and 70%) then hormonenaïve patients (<strong>10</strong>% and 53%)(p=0.03 and<br />

0.02). In a separate analysis <strong>of</strong> patients who did not receive HT, the<br />

relative rates <strong>of</strong> acute and chronic GU and GI toxicities were<br />

comparable. Gland volume did not predict acute or chronic toxicity.<br />

Table 1. Acute and chronic toxicities (all patients)(A.T.=acute<br />

toxicity, C.T.=chronic toxicity)<br />

All (n=415) Toxicity 38/4<br />

(n=256)<br />

24/2<br />

(n=68)<br />

27/2 (n=91) p<br />

value<br />

G1 G2 G3 G1 G2 G3 G1 G2 G3 G1 G2 G3<br />

A.T. 33% <strong>12</strong>% 1% Freq./Urg. 34% 11% 2% 31% 13% 0% 30% 13% 0% 0.56<br />

20% 3% 0% Dysuria 23% 3% 0% 14% 4% 0% 14% 1% 0% 0.11<br />

<strong>12</strong>% 6%


S94 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

PO232<br />

ARE URETHRAL TOXICITIES CORRELATED WITH DOSE AFTER<br />

INTERSTITIAL HDR BOOST BRACHYTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER?<br />

R. Broksch 1 , F.A. Siebert 1 , N. Brüske 1 , B. Kimmig 1 , R. Galalae 2<br />

1 University Hospital SH Campus Kiel, Radiotherapy, Kiel, Germany<br />

2 University Hospital SH Campus Kiel, Medical Faculty, Kiel, Germany<br />

: HDR brachytherapy as boost technique for<br />

prostate cancer patients is in our clinic a well established technique.<br />

Study aim was a volumetric evaluation stratified by anatomyrelated<br />

urethral segmentation in correlation with urethral toxicities.<br />

: HDRBT prescription prostate dose was 2x15<br />

Gy to peripheral zone (CTV1) and 8.5 Gy to the whole prostate gland<br />

(CTV2), using 8 ± 1 (SD) implant needles. Dosimetric analyses were<br />

performed in 70 consecutive patients i.e. 140 HDRBTfractions,<br />

treated in 2003. Intraoperative technique based on TRUS images was<br />

applied. The echo <strong>of</strong> an inserted catheter plus 2 mm margin was<br />

digitized as urethra structure, and was digitally divided into three<br />

anatomical distinct parts. Two very basal TRUSimages + one cranial<br />

additional were defined as 'basal urethra', and two very apical slices +<br />

one distal additional as 'apical urethra'. The remaining mid part was<br />

labeled 'pars prostatica'. For each partial volume D5 and D0.1cc were<br />

calculated using the TG43 formalism and the mean dose indices over<br />

the two fractions were used for evaluation. Late urethral toxicities<br />

were analyzed for each patient according to RTOG/EORTC<br />

classification and compared against the computed urethral doses <strong>of</strong><br />

the three segments.<br />

: For basal urethra, the D5 was <strong>10</strong>.1 ±3.8 Gy (SD), and for<br />

D0.1cc 8.6 ±2.9 Gy. Similar values were measured in the apex: D5<br />

<strong>10</strong>.2 ±2.8 Gy and D0.1cc 8.4 ±2.3 Gy, while pars prostatica showed<br />

higher D5 with <strong>12</strong>.4 ±3.7 Gy and D0.1cc 11.6 ±3.7 Gy.<br />

Late toxicities <strong>of</strong> grade 3 cystitis were found in 6%. One patient with<br />

grade 4 toxicity developed a bladder fistula. First results show no<br />

correlations between dose indices in the distinct urethra segments<br />

and toxicities.<br />

: Dosimetric differences in three sequential anatomy<br />

related urethral segments were detected. Nevertheless, no<br />

correlation between dose and late toxicities in the urethra could be<br />

found is this study.<br />

PO233<br />

INTENSITY MODULATED HIGHDOSERATE BRACHYTHERAPY AS<br />

MONOTHERAPY FOR CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER<br />

N. Tselis 1 , D. Baltas 2 , U.W. Tunn 3 , T. Buhleier 1 , T. Martin 4 , N.<br />

Milickovic 2 , S. Papaioannou 2 , H. Ackermann 5 , N. Zamboglou 1<br />

1<br />

Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Offenbach am Main, Germany<br />

2<br />

Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics and<br />

Engineering, Offenbach am Main, Germany<br />

3<br />

Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Department <strong>of</strong> Urology, Offenbach am<br />

Main, Germany<br />

4<br />

Klinikum Bremen Mitte, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Bremen,<br />

Germany<br />

5<br />

J.W. Goethe University <strong>of</strong> Frankfurt, Institute <strong>of</strong> Biostatistics,<br />

Frankfurt am Main, Germany<br />

: To report the clinical outcome <strong>of</strong> intensity<br />

modulated (IM) high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BRT) as sole<br />

treatment (monotherapy) for localized prostate cancer.<br />

: Between January 2002 and December 2009,<br />

718 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer were treated<br />

with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided IMHDR monotherapy. Three<br />

biologically equivalent treatment protocols were applied; 141 patients<br />

received 38 Gy using one implant at 4 fractions <strong>of</strong> 9.5 Gy with<br />

computed tomography based treatment planning [Group A], 351<br />

patients received 38 Gy in 4 fractions <strong>of</strong> 9.5 Gy using two implants (2<br />

weeks apart) and intraoperative TRUS realtime treatment planning<br />

[Group B], and 226 patients received 34.5 Gy using three single<br />

fraction implants <strong>of</strong> 11.5 Gy (3 weeks apart) and intraoperative TRUS<br />

realtime treatment planning [Group C]. Biochemical failure was<br />

defined according to the `Phoenix consensus´ and toxicity evaluated<br />

using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.<br />

: The median followup was 52.8 months. For the entire<br />

cohort, the 36, 60 and 96 months biochemical control (BC),<br />

metastasisfree survival, and overall survival rates were 97 %, 94 %, 89<br />

% and 99 %, 98 %, 97 % as well as 98 %, 96 % and 95 %, respectively.<br />

For Group A (n=141) and Group B (n=351) the 36, 60 and 96 (80)<br />

months BC rates were 97 %, 94 %, 89 % (96 months) and 99 %, 98 %,<br />

and 97 % (80 months), respectively. For Group C (n=226), the <strong>12</strong>, 24<br />

and 35 months BC rates were <strong>10</strong>0 %, 98 % and 95 %, respectively.<br />

Toxicity was scored per event with 5.4 % acute Grade 3 genitourinary<br />

and 0.2 % acute Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity. Late Grade 3<br />

genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity were 3.5 % and 1.6 %,<br />

respectively. Two patients developed Grade 4 genitourinary toxicity.<br />

No other instance <strong>of</strong> Grad 4 or greater acute or late toxicity was<br />

reported.<br />

: Our results confirm IMHDRBRT to be a safe and<br />

effective monotherapeutic treatment modality for clinically <strong>org</strong>an<br />

confined prostate cancer.<br />

<br />

PO234<br />

DOSE OPTIMIZATION OF INTRAVAGINAL BRACHYTHERAPY USING<br />

DIFFERENT MULTICHANNEL APPLICATORS<br />

H. Kuo 1 , K. Mehta 1 , R. Yaparpalvi 1 , L. Hong 1 , A. Wu 1 , D. Mynampati 1 ,<br />

W. Bodner 1 , M. Garg 1 , S. Kalnicki 1<br />

1 Montefiore Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Bronx NY, USA<br />

: An inflatable applicator (Capri TM , Varian, USA)<br />

with thirteen lumens is designed with the advantage <strong>of</strong> reducing air<br />

pocket, and conforming dose to patient tissues. It is arranged in two<br />

concentric rings (with six lumens each) surrounding a central lumen.<br />

This study investigates the dose distribution in intravagina between<br />

applicators <strong>of</strong> Capri, multichannel cylinder, Contura balloon, and<br />

Mammosite balloon (Figure 1).<br />

: Plans for Capri (injected water <strong>of</strong> 30 cc, 40<br />

cc, and 60 cc which corresponding to 3.5 cm, 3.7 cm, and 4.2 cm<br />

respectively) were configured with central lumen activated only (C),<br />

middle ring lumens activated only (M), outer ring lumens activated<br />

only (O), all lumens activated (CMO), outer ring lumens activated<br />

combined with selective dwell positions in middle ring lumens<br />

activated (mO). The goals were dose prescribed to 5mm depth (PTV)<br />

from surface <strong>of</strong> each applicator (D90>90%) with minimum dose at<br />

normal tissue (OAR) which is another 5mm away. To study the<br />

difference <strong>of</strong> dose to the apex <strong>of</strong> the vagina and dose to the body <strong>of</strong><br />

vagina, plans were evaluated at the proximal 2 cm length vagina<br />

[PTV_A(V150) & OAR_A(V80)] and the rest <strong>of</strong> treatment length at<br />

vagina body [PTV_B(V150) & OAR_B(V80)].<br />

: Compares similar size (3.5cm diameter at midbody) <strong>of</strong><br />

different applicators, Contura and Mammosite have lowest<br />

OAR_B(V80) but have maximal PTV_B(V150) (<strong>12</strong>%) as well. Capri<br />

planned with 'O' loading or 'mO' loading has slightly better OAR_B(V80)<br />

and reasonable PTV_B(V150) (~5%) compared to multichannel<br />

cylinder. At apical vagina, Contura & Mammosite have similar<br />

PTV_A(V150) and have better OAR_A(V80) comparing to Capri. Muliti<br />

channel cylinder has the highest value in both <strong>of</strong> PTV_A(V150) and<br />

OAR_A(V80). The sizes <strong>of</strong> the Contura and Mammosite limit their<br />

treatment length to the vaginal body. Compares different<br />

configurations <strong>of</strong> activated lumens in Capri with different sizes, plans<br />

in 'C' or 'M' loading show better at PTV( V150) but worse at OAR(V80);<br />

on the contrary, plans in 'O' loading show better at OAR( V80) but<br />

worse at PTV(V150). Plans in 'CMO' loading have PTV(V150) close to<br />

plans in 'C' & 'M' loading but the OAR(V80) are not optimum. To<br />

minimize PTV(V150) and OAR(V80) simultaneously, plan in 'mO' loading<br />

is the best choice for each size. It <strong>of</strong>fers the least amount <strong>of</strong> OAR(V80)<br />

which is close to plan in 'O' loading yet with moderate value <strong>of</strong><br />

PTV(150).<br />

: Postoperative endometrial brachytherapy using Capri<br />

applicator which has the potential <strong>of</strong> eliminating airsurface interface<br />

results in excellent intravagina dose coverage. A modifiedperipheral<br />

loading <strong>of</strong> the total 13 lumens provides tolerable dose to mucosa <strong>of</strong><br />

vagina, good coverage to vaginal treatment depth, and the best dose<br />

sparing at normal tissue.<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 95<br />

PO235<br />

CLINICAL OUTCOME AND DOSIMETRIC PARAMETERS OF MRIGUIDED<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY IN CERVICAL CANCER PATIENTS<br />

C.N. Nomden 1 , A.A.C. de Leeuw 1 , J.M. Roesink 1 , J.H.A. Tersteeg 1 ,<br />

M.A. Moerland 1 , I.M. JürgenliemkSchulz 1<br />

1 U.M.C. Utrecht, Radiotherapy, Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />

: To report and evaluate the dosimetric<br />

parameters and clinical outcome <strong>of</strong> our first patients treated with a<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) ± chemotherapy<br />

and MRI guided brachytherapy (BT).<br />

: Fortysix cervical cancer patients treated<br />

between January 2006 and October 2008 were analysed. EBRT dose<br />

was 45Gy in 25 fractions and concomitant monotherapy cisplatin was<br />

given weekly (40 mg/m 2 ). PDR (n=39), HDR (n=5), or combined<br />

HDR/PDR (n=2) MRIguided BT was delivered using either an<br />

intracavitary (IC) or combined intracavitary/interstitial (IC/IS)<br />

approach. The aim <strong>of</strong> BT treatment was to increase the D90 HRCTV<br />

while taking into account the dose volume constraints for bladder,<br />

rectum, sigmoid, and bowel (D2cc < 90, 75, 75, and 75Gy EQD2,<br />

respectively). Outcome was evaluated in terms <strong>of</strong> tumour control and<br />

survival. Additionally, late morbidity was scored using CTCAE v3.0.<br />

: Thirtytwo patients (70 %) were treated with the IC approach<br />

and 14 (30 %) with IC/IS using the Utrecht interstitial CT/MR<br />

applicator. Median HRCTV volume was 45.1 cm 3 (<strong>12</strong>–182) at time <strong>of</strong><br />

the first BT application. Mean total D90 HRCTV was 84±9 Gy EQD2,<br />

with a D2cc for bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and bowel <strong>of</strong> 83±7, 66±6,<br />

61±6, and 64±9 Gy EQD2, respectively. Figure1 shows that higher D90<br />

HRCTV values were easier achieved in smaller tumour volumes. No<br />

significant relation was found between delivered dose and local<br />

recurrences (only 3 cases). Median followup was 41 months for all<br />

patients. Local control, progression free survival, and overall survival<br />

at 3 years were 93, 72, and 65%, respectively. Failures occurred in 13<br />

patients (28%): 3 local and 6 regional failures (persistent disease and<br />

recurrences), 5 paraaortic failures, and <strong>10</strong> distant metastases. Table1<br />

shows the progression free survival (PFS) and the failures in relation<br />

to the FIGO stages.<br />

Eighteen late morbidities (grade 35) were observed in 6 <strong>of</strong> 46<br />

patients. Gastrointestinal toxicity: 2 rectal bleedings (G3), 2 proctitis<br />

(G3), 1 diarrhoea (G3), 1 rectal incontinence (G4), 1 radiation<br />

enteritis (G4), and 1 rectovaginal fistula (G4). Sexual/ reproductive<br />

toxicity: 1 vaginal stenosis (G3) and 1 vagina mucositis (G4).<br />

Renal/genitourinary: 1 ureter stenosis (G3).Musculoskeletal fibrosis<br />

(G3) was seen in one patient, abdominal epidermolysis (G3) in one,<br />

and one patient had anaemia (G3). Finally, one patient with vaginal<br />

top necrosis (G4) and underlying coagulation disorder due to alcohol<br />

related liver failure died because <strong>of</strong> vaginal bleeding (G5).<br />

: The addition <strong>of</strong> MRI guidance to the treatment <strong>of</strong><br />

advanced cervical cancer results in high local control rates. Future<br />

work should focus on the prevention <strong>of</strong> regional and distant failures<br />

and the reduction <strong>of</strong> late toxicity.<br />

PO236<br />

3D IMAGE BASED VS. POINT BASED DOSIMETRY FOR CERVICAL CANCER:<br />

EARLY OUTCOME ANALYSIS<br />

N. Kannan 1 , H. Kim 2 , C. Houser 2 , S. Beriwal 2<br />

1 University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh, School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA<br />

: Currently, most <strong>of</strong> the published outcomes data<br />

for cervical cancer brachytherapy utilizes pointbased dosimetry,<br />

where the goal is to deliver <strong>10</strong>0% ± 5 % <strong>of</strong> the prescription dose to the<br />

designated 'point A'. The last ABS survey, conducted in 2007, revealed<br />

that 55% <strong>of</strong> the respondents used CTbased planning. Of these<br />

respondents, 76% still prescribed to Point A instead <strong>of</strong> using a 3D<br />

derived tumor volume. Radiation oncologists may be reluctant to<br />

accept 3D imageguided brachytherapy (IGBT) plans for patients in<br />

whom the point A dose is significantly lower than prescription dose<br />

because <strong>of</strong> concerns for inferior outcomes. But using a fixed<br />

prescription point can result in greater than necessary doses to the<br />

adjacent bowel and bladder and a correspondingly greater risk <strong>of</strong><br />

serious treatment complications. The goal <strong>of</strong> our study was to look at<br />

the response rates and outcomes <strong>of</strong> patients who were treated with<br />

IGBT with CT or MRI based planning and had a point A dose that was<br />

less than 90% <strong>of</strong> prescription dose.<br />

: We have treated <strong>10</strong>3 patients from January<br />

2007 to June 2011 with IGBT with the dose optimized to the HRCTV.<br />

Of these patients, 30 with FIGO stage IB1 to IIIB had a point A dose<br />

less than 90% <strong>of</strong> the prescription dose and were included in the study.<br />

Eleven patients had pelvic and/or periaortic nodes visualized on<br />

PET/CT. The median pretreatment tumor size was 4 (0.9 to 9.0) cm<br />

and 11 patients had a tumor size ≥ 5 cm. The median age was 56<br />

(range 2286). 22 patients had an MRIbased plan and 8 patients had a<br />

CTbased plan for HDR brachytherapy. The brachytherapy dose was<br />

5.5 Gy x 5 fractions (25 pts) and 5 Gy x 5 (5 pts). At planning, the goal<br />

was to achieve D90 (dose to 90% <strong>of</strong> HRCTV) <strong>of</strong> ≥<strong>10</strong>0% <strong>of</strong> prescription<br />

dose. The point A dose was recorded but not used for prescription or<br />

treatment. The median point A dose was 85 (50 to 89)% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

prescription dose. The median HRCTV treated was 28.9 (15.338.5)<br />

cc. The median EQD2 D90 HRCTV and median EQD2 Point A were<br />

82.3 ( 75.989.8) Gy and 73.9 (58.074.9) Gy ( p


S96 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

: All thirty patients completed the planned course <strong>of</strong> radiation<br />

treatment. All but two were available for assessment <strong>of</strong> response. All<br />

28 patients had complete clinical response. Twentythree patients had<br />

a followup PET/CT at 3 months posttreatment, and all showed<br />

complete metabolic response in the cervix. One patient had residual<br />

uptake in the leftexternal iliac node, but this was decreased when<br />

compared to a pretreatment PET/CT. At the median followup time<br />

<strong>of</strong> 7.2 months (334 months) ,one patient has developed recurrence<br />

with bone metastases at 29 months. One patient developed a RTOG<br />

grade 3 complication <strong>of</strong> enterovaginal fistula at <strong>10</strong> months post<br />

therapy requiring surgical intervention. This patient’s point A % dose<br />

was 85%, D90 HDR CTV 84 Gy (<strong>10</strong>8%), and D2cc bladder, rectum, and<br />

sigmoid colon doses were 79.5 Gy, 59.2 Gy, and 70.9 Gy respectively.<br />

: Our early results suggest that the 3D dosimetry<br />

translated into excellent response rate and early outcome in these<br />

patients. The decrease in point A dose did not cause any detrimental<br />

effects and should be reassuring to the treating clinician. We need<br />

both interim and longterm outcome data with this approach for wider<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> this technique.<br />

PO237<br />

DOSIMETRIC EFFECTS OF RECTAL FILLING ON VAGINAL CYLINDER<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

S. Sabater 1 , I. Andres 1 , V. de la Vara 2 , M.J. Muñoz 2 , E. Jimenez 1 , M.V.<br />

Carrizo 1 , A. Martos 1 , R. Berenguer 1 , A. Nuñez 1 , M. Arenas 3<br />

1 Hospital General de Albacete, Radiation Oncology, Albacete, Spain<br />

2 Hospital General de Albacete, Radiation Physics, Albacete, Spain<br />

3 Hospital Sant Joan de Reus, Radiation Oncology, Reus, Spain<br />

: Bladder filling variations have shown dosimetric<br />

consequences on <strong>org</strong>ans <strong>of</strong> risk on patients referred for vaginal<br />

brachytherapy. Fewer reports have been focused on the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

rectal filling when treating such patients despite this subject has<br />

received great attention on external irradiation. The aim <strong>of</strong> this study<br />

was to evaluate the variation <strong>of</strong> rectal dose related to the rectal<br />

distension, on patients treated postoperatively with vaginal cylinder<br />

brachytherapy related to rectal distention.<br />

: Retrospective brachytherapy evaluation was<br />

done for seventeen patients with endometrial cancer treated with<br />

fractionated postoperative HDR vaginal cuff cylinders (MicroSelectron)<br />

alone or after an external radiotherapy course. Identical cylinder on<br />

each insertion was used. A CTscan was done on each fraction.<br />

Bladder was catheterized and filled with 50cc (5 cc <strong>of</strong> iodine contrast<br />

dissolved in 45 cc <strong>of</strong> saline water during CT. No special instructions<br />

were given to patients except for attempting to evacuate prior to<br />

come to the hospital. Barium rectal contrast (50cc) was administered<br />

in some fractions at discretion <strong>of</strong> the treating physician. 3D dose<br />

planning was performed with PLATO v14.2.6. External surfaces <strong>of</strong> the<br />

rectum and bladder were countered; bladder was contoured on all CT<br />

scans. The rectum was contoured from 1 cm above the tip <strong>of</strong> cylinders<br />

to the caudal well position level. Documented rectal doses were D0.1cc,<br />

D1cc, D2cc, D5cc and D<strong>10</strong>cc. Doses were recorded as percentages from the<br />

prescribed dose to 0.5 cm from the cylinder surface. Cross sectional<br />

area (CSA) was also calculated<br />

: Seventyfour CTseries were reviewed, 3 to 6 series per<br />

patient (mean 4.7, median 4). Barium rectal contrast was<br />

administered on the 16% <strong>of</strong> fractions. Percentages <strong>of</strong> fractions with<br />

barium per patient fluctuate between 0% and 50%. Rectal volumes and<br />

dosimetric results are tabulated in table 1. Independent non<br />

parametrical test showed significance in all rectal level doses<br />

analysed.<br />

Mean Mean no barium Mean barium p<br />

Rectum volume (cc) 47.32 45.34 57.73 .155<br />

CSA 9.17 8.83 <strong>10</strong>.87 .083<br />

D Rectum 0.1 cc (%) 118.26 115.1 134.81 .000<br />

D Rectum 1 cc (%) 96.83 93.93 1<strong>12</strong>.07 .000<br />

D Rectum 2 cc (%) 87.56 84.61 <strong>10</strong>3.02 .000<br />

D Rectum 5 cc (%) 71.45 68.54 86.70 .000<br />

D Rectum <strong>10</strong> cc (%) 56.03 53.37 69.93 .000<br />

: Our preliminary results shown a dismal effect related to<br />

the barium contrast enema. A significant increment <strong>of</strong> rectal doses<br />

was evident over the full length <strong>of</strong> the rectal DVH related to such<br />

intervention. Despite we could see as the rectal volume and CSA<br />

increased as well, the first didn’t reached a statistically significance<br />

and the second remained borderline. Our data attract attention to<br />

avoid maneuvers that distend rectum and, if the data are confirmed,<br />

could warrant to empty the rectum before any vaginal cuff<br />

brachytherapy fraction.<br />

PO238<br />

DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON OF OPTIMISATION METHODS FOR<br />

MULTICHANNEL INTRACAVITARY VAGINAL BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

C. Lapuz 1 , C. Dempsey 2 , P. O'Brien 2<br />

1<br />

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Division <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Melbourne, Australia<br />

2<br />

Calvary Mater Newcastle, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Newcastle, Australia<br />

: To compare dose distributions generated by<br />

inverse planning simulated annealing (IPSA), dose point optimisation<br />

(DPO) and graphical optimisation (GrO) for vaginal cancers treated<br />

with high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy using a multichannel<br />

intracavitary vaginal cylinder.<br />

: CT data sets were obtained for five<br />

consecutive patients with recurrent vaginal cancers treated with<br />

multichannel intracavitary HDR brachytherapy. Treatment plans were<br />

generated using DPO, GrO, surface optimisation with IPSA (surf IPSA),<br />

and volume optimisation with IPSA (vol IPSA). The plans were<br />

evaluated for target coverage, conformal index (COIN), dose<br />

homogeneity index (DHI) and dose to <strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OARs).<br />

: Vol IPSA and surf IPSA achieved the best target coverage with<br />

mean V<strong>10</strong>0 values <strong>of</strong> 95.46% (range: 90.56–98.81%) and 93.04% (range:<br />

87.94–97.70%) respectively. Mean D90 was similar for GrO, surf IPSA<br />

and vol IPSA plans. Rectal D2cc was within tolerance for all<br />

optimisation methods. Vol IPSA plans resulted in slightly higher<br />

bladder D2cc for some patients and higher vaginal mucosa D0.5cc for<br />

all patients. Surf IPSA and DPO provided the greatest homogeneity<br />

within the target volume with mean DHIs <strong>of</strong> 0.81 (range: 0.79–0.83)<br />

and 0.81 (range: 0.78–0.83) respectively. Surf IPSA and GrO had the<br />

highest conformity with mean COINs <strong>of</strong> 0.74 (range: 0.64–0.85) and<br />

0.71 (range: 0.67–0.80) respectively. Vol IPSA plans had inferior<br />

homogeneity and conformity with mean DHI <strong>of</strong> 0.55 (range: 0.48–0.68)<br />

and mean COIN <strong>of</strong> 0.54 (range: 0.39–0.74).<br />

: Surf IPSA was user friendly for the generation <strong>of</strong><br />

treatment plans and achieved good target coverage, conformity and<br />

homogeneity with acceptable doses to OARs. Vol IPSA plans provided<br />

good target coverage but resulted in higher doses to the vaginal<br />

mucosa and lower COIN and DHI. DPO plans provided inadequate<br />

coverage <strong>of</strong> the target volume. GrO resulted in acceptable plans but<br />

at the expense <strong>of</strong> increased planning times.<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 97<br />

PO239<br />

THE ROLE OF VAGINAL BRACHYTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF STAGE<br />

I PAPILLARY SEROUS OR CLEAR CELL ENDOMETRIAL CANCER<br />

B. Barney 1 , I. Petersen 1 , M. Haddock 1<br />

1<br />

<strong>May</strong>o Clinic, Academic Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Rochester, USA<br />

: International Federation <strong>of</strong> Gynecology and<br />

Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage I papillary serous (PS) and clear cell (CC)<br />

endometrial histologies were excluded or underrepresented on<br />

practicedefining endometrial cancer trials, resulting in confusion<br />

regarding the optimal adjuvant therapy for patients with these<br />

tumors. Because they are at a high risk for both local and extrapelvic<br />

relapse, adjuvant chemotherapy is commonly administered to these<br />

women; however, recommendations for adjuvant radiotherapy vary<br />

widely. We report on the largest singleinstitution experience using<br />

adjuvant highdose rate (HDR) vaginal brachytherapy (VBT)<br />

for patients with FIGO Stage I PS or CC endometrial cancer.<br />

:From 1998 to 2011, <strong>10</strong>3 women with FIGO<br />

2009 Stage I PS (n=74, 72%), CC (n=21, 20%), or mixed PS/CC (n=8, 8%)<br />

endometrial cancer underwent surgical staging followed by adjuvant<br />

HDR VBT. Surgery consisted <strong>of</strong>, at a minimum, total abdominal<br />

hysterectomy and bilateral salpingooophorectomy (TAH/BSO), and<br />

nearly all patients (n=98, 95%) also underwent extended lymph node<br />

dissection, with a median number <strong>of</strong> nodes dissected <strong>of</strong> 45 (range, 0<br />

to <strong>10</strong>0). Other common surgical procedures included peritoneal fluid<br />

washings (n=92, 89%), omentectomy (n=83, 81%), and random<br />

peritoneal biopsies (n=63, 61%). All VBT was performed with a multi<br />

channel vaginal cylinder, treating to a dose <strong>of</strong> 21 Gy in 3 fractions.<br />

The treatment volume consisted <strong>of</strong> the entire vaginal mucosa<br />

extending from the vaginal cuff to within 1 to 2 cm <strong>of</strong> the urethral<br />

meatus. Thirtyfive patients (34%) also received adjuvant platinum<br />

based chemotherapy, either prior to (n=7, 20%) or after (n=28, 80%)<br />

HDR VBT.<br />

: At a median followup <strong>of</strong> 36 months (range, 1 to 146 months),<br />

2 patients had experienced a vaginal recurrence (VR), and the 5year<br />

Kaplan Meier (KM) estimate <strong>of</strong> VR was 3%. Rates <strong>of</strong> isolated pelvic<br />

(PR), locoregional (LRR, VR + PR), and extrapelvic (EPR, including<br />

intraabdominal) recurrence were similarly low, with 5year KM<br />

estimates <strong>of</strong> 4, 7, and <strong>10</strong>%, respectively. Estimates for 5year disease<br />

free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 88 and 84%,<br />

respectively (see Figure). On univariate analysis, having nonPS<br />

histology was associated with an increased risk <strong>of</strong> VR (p=0.02).<br />

: Vaginal brachytherapy is effective at preventing vaginal<br />

relapse in women with Stage I PS or CC endometrial cancer. In this<br />

cohort <strong>of</strong> surgically staged patients, the risk <strong>of</strong> isolated pelvic or<br />

extrapelvic relapse was low, implying more extensive adjuvant<br />

radiotherapy is likely unnecessary.<br />

PO240<br />

DAILY HDR BRACHYTHERAPY IN THE POSTOPERATIVE SETTING OF<br />

ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA<br />

A. Rovirosa 1 , I. Valduvieco 1 , A. Herreros 1 , C. Bautista 1 , I. Romera 1 , I.<br />

Rios 1 , M. Arenas 2 , A. Biete 1<br />

1 Hospital Clinic i Universitari, Radiation Oncology, Barcelona, Spain<br />

2 Hospital Sant Joan de Reus, Radiation Oncology, Tarragona, Spain<br />

: To analyze the preliminary results <strong>of</strong> HDR<br />

brachytherapy (HDRBT) administered daily on local control and<br />

toxicity in postoperative endometrial carcinoma (EC).<br />

: From January 2007 to September 20<strong>10</strong>, 1<strong>12</strong><br />

patients with FIGO Stage 24IA, 48IB, 14II, <strong>12</strong>IIIA, IIIIIB, 8IIIC1 and<br />

4IIIC2, were treated with HDRBT after surgery. Pathology: 99/1<strong>12</strong><br />

endometrioid and 23/1<strong>12</strong> other types. Radiotherapy. Group 1: 70/1<strong>12</strong><br />

External beam irradiation (EBI) + HDRBT (2 fractions 56Gy); Group 2:<br />

42/1<strong>12</strong> HDRBT alone (4 fractions 56Gy). Toxicity evaluation: RTOG<br />

scores for bladder and rectum; Objective criteria <strong>of</strong> LENTSOMA for<br />

vagina. Statistics: Chisquare and Fisher exact test.<br />

: With a mean followup <strong>of</strong> 29.5 months (range 9.653.6) no<br />

patients developed vaginalcuff relapse. Toxicity. Group 1: early G1<br />

G2 appeared in 9% in rectum, 8.5% bladder, 1.4% in vagina (stenosis);<br />

late problems appeared in 8.5% in rectum (all G<strong>12</strong> but 1 G3) and 25%<br />

in vagina (all G<strong>12</strong> but 1G4). Group 2: Early G<strong>12</strong> toxicity 9.4% in<br />

bladder, 6.9% in vagina; late problems appeared in 2.3% in rectum<br />

(G1) and 6.9% in vagina (G<strong>12</strong>).<br />

: Daily HDRBT using 2 fractions <strong>of</strong> 5Gy after EBI and 4<br />

fractions <strong>of</strong> 5Gy as exclusive treatment was a safe regime in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

local control and toxicity; Group 1 had a higher incidence <strong>of</strong> late<br />

vaginal toxicity. This regime allows all the treatment to be performed<br />

in a lower overall interval time and is less resource consuming than<br />

other regimes with a greater number <strong>of</strong> fractions.<br />

PO241<br />

THREEDIMENSIONAL IMAGE GUIDED PULSED DOSE RATE<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY BOOSTING BULKY CERVICAL CANCER<br />

T. Refaat 1 , W. Small Jr 1 , N. Lotfy 2 , A. Elsaid 2 , E. Lartigau 3 , P. Nickers 3<br />

1<br />

Northwestern University, Radiation Oncology, Chicago, USA<br />

2<br />

Alexandria University, Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Egypt<br />

3<br />

Centre Oscar Lambret and University Lille II, Academic Radiation<br />

Oncology Department, Lille, France<br />

: Concomitant radiotherapy and platinumbased<br />

chemotherapy is the standard <strong>of</strong> care for patients with locally<br />

advanced cervical cancer. Pulsed Dose Rate (PDR) <strong>Brachytherapy</strong><br />

rather than High Dose Rate (HDR) <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> may decrease normal<br />

tissue toxicity due to radiobiological advantages while maintaining the<br />

ability to optimize dose distribution. This study aimed to determine<br />

the feasibility, tolerance and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Image Guided PDR<br />

brachytherapy after External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) and weekly<br />

cisplatin for cervix cancer.<br />

: Forty female patients with histologically<br />

confirmed Stage IB2 or II cervical cancer and treated with<br />

concomitant EBRT and cisplatin followed by a PDR brachytherapy<br />

boost were identified. All patients were initially evaluated with EUA,<br />

CT, MRI, and laparoscopic lymphadenectomy or PET scan. Patients<br />

received 45 50 Gy EBRT to the pelvis with concomitant weekly<br />

cisplatin 40mg/m 2 for 56 cycles. All patients then underwent<br />

reimaging with CT or MRI prior to brachytherapy. The brachytherapy<br />

boost was accomplished with one insertion using an MRI compatible<br />

tandem and ovoid applicator. A PLATO treatment planning system<br />

using MRI imaging and target definition based on GEC ESTRO<br />

guidelines was used. 0.5 Gy per fraction was delivered every hour for<br />

a duration <strong>of</strong> 6070 hours to a total dose <strong>of</strong> 3035 Gy to the HR CTV<br />

and <strong>10</strong>15 Gy to the IR CTV. Dose to <strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OAR), rectum,<br />

bladder, and sigmoid was limited to


S98 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

The disease free survival was 92.5%. Acute toxicity was as follows:<br />

<strong>10</strong>% grade 3 anemia, 2.5% grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia,<br />

<strong>12</strong>.5% grade 3 diarrhea, 5% grade 2 and 2.5% grade 3 proctitis.<br />

: There are few reports <strong>of</strong> PDR brachytherapy boost using<br />

imageguidance in stage IB2 and II cervix cancer. In this study, a PDR<br />

brachytherapy boost using MRI image guidance after external beam<br />

radiotherapy and cisplatin was welltolerated. Although follow up was<br />

relatively short, local control and toxicity appear comparable, and<br />

possibly superior, to that in studies using imageguided HDR<br />

brachytherapy. The advantages <strong>of</strong> PDR brachytherapy include a<br />

reduction in medical resources by requiring only a single admission to<br />

the operating room and reduction in physics time by requiring only<br />

one treatment planning, reduction <strong>of</strong> total treatment time possibly<br />

improving local control, reducing treatment induced toxicities and<br />

minimal risk <strong>of</strong> radiation exposure to patient and medical personnel<br />

PO242<br />

<strong>12</strong>5I SEED PERMANENT IMPLANTATION FOR PELVIC RECURRENT<br />

GYNECOLOGICAL MALIGNANCIES AFTER MULTIPLE THERAPY<br />

W. Jiang 1 , J. Li 1 , L. Zhu 1 , P. Jiang 1 , H. Wang 1 , J. Wang 1 , C. Liu 2 , H.<br />

Yuan 2 , W. Ran 3<br />

1<br />

Peking University Third Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Beijing, China<br />

2<br />

Peking University Third Hospital, radiology department, Beijing,<br />

China<br />

3<br />

Peking University Third Hospital, Ultrasound, Beijing, China<br />

: To assess the feasibility, efficacy, and morbidity<br />

<strong>of</strong> imageguided radioactive iodine <strong>12</strong>5 ( <strong>12</strong>5 I) seed implantation for<br />

pelvic recurrent gynecological malignancies after multiple therapies.<br />

: From July 2005 to July 20<strong>10</strong>, 11 patients with<br />

<strong>12</strong>5<br />

pelvic recurrent gynecologic malignancies received I seed<br />

implantation guided by computerized tomography (CT) or ultrasound.<br />

The primary cancers were cervical cancer (n = 8), endometrial cancer<br />

(n = 2), and leiomyosarcoma <strong>of</strong> the uterus (n = 1). Ten patients had<br />

undergone surgery, EBRT and chemotherapy before seed implantation,<br />

one had undergone only surgery and EBRT, and the median total dose<br />

was 68 Gy (range, 50<strong>10</strong>2 Gy). Seven patients were suffering from<br />

pain. Six masses were treated by CTguided, one by intraoperative<br />

ultrasound, two by ultrasound, two by transvaginal ultrasound, and<br />

two by transrectal ultrasound. A median <strong>of</strong> 29 seeds per patient<br />

(range, <strong>10</strong><strong>10</strong>9) were implanted, with a median activity <strong>of</strong> 0.7 mCi<br />

(range, 0.40.8 mCi). The actuarial median D90 is 13290cGy (5455.3<br />

171<strong>10</strong>cGy)<br />

: After a median followup <strong>of</strong> 13.6 months (range, 336<br />

months), 85.7% (6/7) patients received relief from pain. Median local<br />

control was six months (95% CI, 4.47.6 months). The 1 , 2, and 3<br />

year local control rates were 18.2%, 18.2%, and 18.2%, respectively.<br />

Median overall survival was 13.6 months (95% CI, 8.618.6 months).<br />

The 1, 2, and 3year actuarial overall survival rates were 63.6%,<br />

11.4%, and 11.4%, respectively. One patient (9.1%) developed grade 1<br />

acute toxicity <strong>of</strong> the urinary system.<br />

: Interstitial <strong>12</strong>5 I seed implantation guided by CT or<br />

ultrasound is a safe and effective palliative therapy for patients with<br />

pelvic recurrent gynecological malignancies after surgery and external<br />

beam radiotherapy.<br />

PO243<br />

LATE TOXICITY AND TOLERANCE OF THE VAGINAL VAULT TO<br />

INTRACAVITARY HIGH DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

O. KaidarPerson 1 , R. AbdahBortnyak 1 , A. Amit 2 , A. Nevelsky 1 , A.<br />

Berniger 1 , R. Bar – Deroma 1 , S. Billan 1 , R. Ben Yosef 1 , A. Kuten 1<br />

1<br />

Rambam Health Care Campus Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine Technion,<br />

Oncology Insitute, Haifa, Israel<br />

2<br />

Rambam Health Care Campus Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine Technion,<br />

Gyneconcology unit, Haifa, Israel<br />

: The tolerability <strong>of</strong> the vaginal vault to<br />

radiotherapy is high; however, this was estimated only in studies using<br />

intracavitary LDR brachytherapy. There are many differences between<br />

HDR treatment plans making it challenging to evaluate its true<br />

biologicalclinical effects; therefore, there is a need for a spectrum <strong>of</strong><br />

maximal surface doses that are safe without causing vaginalvault<br />

necrosis combined with acceptable long term complication rates.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to evaluate the late effects and tolerance <strong>of</strong><br />

the vaginal vault after concomitant chemotherapy with pelvic<br />

irradiation and intracavitary HDR brachytherapy.<br />

: A retrospective review <strong>of</strong> the medical records<br />

<strong>of</strong> all consecutive patients who were treated between 1998 and 2002<br />

was undertaken. Analyzed parameters included radiation dose and<br />

treatment–associated late sequelae <strong>of</strong> the vaginal vault, rectum and<br />

bladder. Vaginal, rectal and bladder toxicity was graded according to<br />

the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version<br />

4.0. The HDR vaginal mucosal dose was calculated for 4 central<br />

reference points on the surface <strong>of</strong> the ovoids. The maximal vaginal<br />

surface dose was defined as the sum <strong>of</strong> the physical doses <strong>of</strong> the<br />

maximal HDR dose (out <strong>of</strong> the 4 reference points) and the external<br />

irradiation dose.<br />

: Fifty patients were included in the study; the average age at<br />

diagnosis was 54 (range 30 – 87) years. There were no records <strong>of</strong> acute<br />

grade IV toxicity during treatment. Seven patients were lost to follow<br />

up. The maximal HDR vaginal surface dose was <strong>10</strong>3 Gy. The maximal<br />

combined external and HDR vaginal surface dose was 148 Gy. There<br />

were no cases <strong>of</strong> vaginal necrosis or fistulas. There were no cases <strong>of</strong><br />

grade IV late vaginal, rectal or bladder toxicity. No correlation was<br />

found between the maximal vaginal surface dose and vaginal, rectal<br />

or bladder toxicity.<br />

: Concomitant chemoradiotherapy including pelvic<br />

radiotherapy and HDR intracavitary brachytherapy is safe in the<br />

definitive treatment <strong>of</strong> advanced uterine cervix carcinoma. The<br />

tolerance dose <strong>of</strong> the vaginal vault using HDR brachytherapy and<br />

pelvic irradiation exceeds 148 Gy.<br />

PO244<br />

A DOSIMETRY PHANTOM FOR GYNEOCOLOGICAL BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

M. Nazarnejad 1 , D.R. Mahdavi 2<br />

1 Medical Radiation Engineering Science and Research Branch Islamic<br />

Azad University Tehran Iran, Medical Radiation Engineering, Tehran,<br />

Iran Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong><br />

2 Tehran University <strong>of</strong> Medical Sciences Science and Research Branch<br />

Islamic Azad University Tehran Iran, Medical physics, Tehran, Iran<br />

Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong><br />

: Dosimetric accuracy is a major issue in the<br />

quality assurance program <strong>of</strong> treatment planning systems (TPS). An<br />

important contribution to this process has been a proper dosimetry<br />

method to guarantee the accuracy <strong>of</strong> delivered dose to the tumor. In<br />

brachytherapy (BX) <strong>of</strong> gyneocological (Gyn) cancer it is usual to insert<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> tandem & ovoids applicators with a complicated<br />

geometry which makes their dosimetry verification difficult and<br />

important. Therefore, evaluation and verification <strong>of</strong> dose distribution<br />

is necessary for accurate dose delivery to the patients.<br />

: The solid phantom was made from Perspex<br />

slabs as a tool for intracavitary brachytherapy dosimetric quality<br />

assurance. Film dosimetry (EDR2) was done for a combination <strong>of</strong><br />

ovoids and tandem applicators introduced by Flexitron brachytherapy<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 99<br />

system. Treatment planning was also done with Flexiplan 3DTPS to<br />

irradiate films sandwiched between phantom slabs. Isodose curves<br />

obtained from treatment planning system and film were compared<br />

with each other in 2D and 3D manners.<br />

: The brachytherapy solid phantom was constructed with slabs.<br />

It was possible to insert tandem and ovoids and after loaded with<br />

radioactive source <strong>of</strong> Ir192. Relative error was between 38.6% and<br />

average relative error was 5.08% in comparison between film and TPS<br />

isodose curves.<br />

: Our results showed that the difference between TPS and<br />

measurement is well in tolerance limits and below the action level<br />

according to AAPM TG.45. Our findings showed that this phantom<br />

after minor corrections can be used as a method <strong>of</strong> choice for inter<br />

comparison analysis <strong>of</strong> TPS and to fill the existed gap for accurate<br />

quality assurance program in intracavitary brachytherapy. Constructed<br />

phantom also showed can be a valuable tool for verification <strong>of</strong><br />

accurate dose delivery to the patients as well as training for<br />

brachytherapy residents and physics students.<br />

PO245<br />

EFFECT OF BLADDER DISTENSION ON DOSIMETRY OF ORGAN AT RISK IN<br />

CT BASED PLANNING OF HDR ICBT FOR CERVICAL CANCER<br />

K. Sazzad Manir 1 , P. Niladri B 1 , B. Swapnendu 2 , G. Jyotirup 3 , K. Apurba<br />

K 1 , S. Shyamal K 1 , B. Kallol 1 , G. Kaushik 2<br />

1<br />

Medical College Kolkata, Dept <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Kolkata, India<br />

2<br />

R.G.Kar Medical College Kolkata, Dept <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Kolkata,<br />

India<br />

3<br />

Wset Bank Hospital, Dept <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Howrah, India<br />

: Distension and shape <strong>of</strong> urinary bladder may vary<br />

during ICBT for cervical cancer, significantly affecting doses to<br />

bladder, rectum and sigmoid colon and consequently late radiation<br />

toxicities.<br />

To evaluate the effects <strong>of</strong> fixed bladder distension with different<br />

volumes on dosimetry, assessed by three dimensional image based<br />

planning techniques, in bladder, rectum and sigmoid colon in cancer<br />

cervix patients during ICBT.<br />

: Forty seven patients <strong>of</strong> cervical cancer (stage<br />

IB to IVA) were taken for ICBT following EBRT (50Gy in 25 fractions,<br />

5days a week).<br />

Patients were grouped in 4 different groups:<br />

Group A :Empty bladder group (defined as no extra saline or contrast<br />

material given after Foleys catheter insertion, gentle evacuation <strong>of</strong><br />

bladder done by Foleys catheter)<br />

Group B(upto 40ccinstillation)<br />

Group C(41cc80cc instillation)<br />

Group D(81cc and above instillation).<br />

Planning CT scans were performed after insertion <strong>of</strong> applicators and<br />

three dimensional treatment planning was done on Brachyvision<br />

treatment planning system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA).<br />

Dose volume histograms were analysed. Bladder, rectum, sigmoid<br />

colon doses were collected for individual plans and compared, based<br />

on the amount <strong>of</strong> bladder filling .<br />

Dose volume data from the different groups were compared using<br />

Multivariate Regression Model (ANOVA, Post Hoc test). A pvalue <strong>of</strong><br />

less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Adjustment for<br />

potential confounders [including parity, tumor stages, and type <strong>of</strong><br />

applicator used] was performed in multiple linear regression models.<br />

: Mean dose to the bladder significantly decreased with<br />

increased bladder filling.<br />

On Post Hoc test analysis and multivariate analysis during multiple<br />

comparisons among each groups it was found that mean dose <strong>of</strong><br />

bladder was significantly decreased in Group D in comparison with<br />

group A (p value 0.001)and also with group B (p value 0.038)..(Mean<br />

value <strong>of</strong> mean dose <strong>of</strong> bladder were 3.2Gy in Group A, 2.9Gy in Group<br />

B, 2.8 Gy in Group C and 2.2 Gy in Group D.). This finding was also<br />

validated by Kruskal Wallis test (Monte Carlo significance was 0.02)<br />

and Mann Whitney U test.<br />

However, doses to the small volumes (0.1cc, 1cc,2cc) which are<br />

relevant for brachytherapy, did not change significantly with bladder<br />

filling for bladder, rectum or sigmoid colon.<br />

On analysing covariable factors such as parity, stage, applicator type<br />

(multivariate analysis) it has been found that maximum dose <strong>of</strong><br />

bladder along with two DVH parameters (0.1ml,1ml volume dose) are<br />

increased in higher parity groups and the change is statistically<br />

significant (average p value was 0.0025) and weak positive correlation<br />

exists.<br />

: There is no significant change in the bladder, rectum<br />

and sigmoid colon dosimetric parameters with bladder distention.<br />

Though mean bladder dose decreaseswith distension <strong>of</strong> bladder there<br />

is no change <strong>of</strong> small volume dose parameters (o.1cc, 1cc,2cc) which<br />

are actually important for late toxicities in ICBT patients. A larger<br />

study with clinical correlation <strong>of</strong> late toxicities is needed to is needed<br />

to evaluate this strategy.<br />

PO246<br />

OVERALL SURVIVAL RATES IN LOCALLY ADVANCED CERVIX CANCER A<br />

BRAZILIAN EXPERIENCE<br />

C. Campos 1 , J.V. Salvajoli 2 , P.E. Novaes 3 , M.G.C. da Silva 4 , J.A.A.<br />

Oliveira 5 , F.J.M. Neto 5<br />

1<br />

Hospital Haroldo Juacaba, Radiatio, Fortaleza, Brazil<br />

2<br />

Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo ICESP, Radiation<br />

Oncology, Sao Paulo, Brazil<br />

3<br />

Instituto Santista de Oncologia ISO, Radiation Oncology, Sao Paulo,<br />

Brazil<br />

4<br />

Hospital Haroldo Juacaba, Epidemiology, Fortaleza, Brazil<br />

5<br />

Universidade do Estado do Ceara UECE, Medicine, Fortaleza, Brazil<br />

: Evaluate the overall survival rates in locally<br />

advanced cervix cancer patients and determine the clinical and<br />

treatment prognostic factors for local control and overall survival<br />

rates.<br />

: A retrospective cohort study was carried out<br />

with 261 patients stage IIIB, 164 patients received 54 Gy RT to the<br />

pelvis and 30 Gy <strong>of</strong> HDR without chemotherapy and 97 patients<br />

received 54 Gy RT to the pelvis and 30 Gy <strong>of</strong> HDR with weekly<br />

cisplatin 40mg/m2 IV (CDDP) from August 1998 to June 2004 in<br />

Hospital Haroldo Juacaba, a Brazilian northeastern hospital. The mean<br />

followup time was 50 months (2185 months) and the KaplanMeier<br />

method was used to calculate survival curves. The nonnormal<br />

distributions were evaluated by nonparametric tests, Cox regression<br />

was used to evaluate multivariate analysis and P values =< 0, 05 were<br />

considered significant.<br />

: Local control rates were 39.6% for exclusively radiation and<br />

50.5% for chemoradiation. There was no statistically significant<br />

difference between groups (p = 0.19). The overall median 5year<br />

survival rate for exclusively radiation was 38.4% and 47.4% for<br />

chemoradiation. The results were not statistically significant (p =<br />

0.36). The mean treatment time was 61 days (39 to 2<strong>10</strong> days). Both<br />

local control and overall survival rates were affected by age,<br />

parametrial involvement and the timing <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy (p0.05). But less than six cycles <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy improved<br />

local control rates better than six or more cycles (55.1% versus 44.9%<br />

p = 0.02).<br />

: The bilateral parametrium infiltration (hazard ratio=<br />

2.96 95% CI 1.306.76 p=0.009) and age


S<strong>10</strong>0 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

: To assess feasibility and implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

Interstitial implant using thermoplastic Poly Ether Etherketone<br />

(PEEK) catheters for MRIbased brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> advanced cervical<br />

cancer in the absence <strong>of</strong> MR compatible applicators.<br />

: <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> in cervical cancer is integral<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the treatment. Gynecological (GYN) GECESTRO introduced<br />

concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix<br />

cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment <strong>of</strong> GTV and<br />

CTV and given the recommendations.<br />

We have treated few cases <strong>of</strong> stage IIIB cervical cancer first with<br />

external beam radiotherapy to a dose <strong>of</strong> 50 Gy in 25 fractions to<br />

whole pelvis using 3D conformal therapy. In our center we lack the MR<br />

Compatible <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> Applicators, but we use to treat them with<br />

interstitial brachytherapy using stainless steel needles with CT<br />

imaging. To overcome this we did implant using semiflexible<br />

thermoplastic PEEK catheters with Syed Neblett template. These<br />

catheters are biocompatible and whole applicator set is MR<br />

compatible. Dicom images <strong>of</strong> MRI T1 and T2 sequences were imported<br />

to Varian brachyvision. With the help <strong>of</strong> MRI we were able to<br />

reconstruct these catheters and volume were delineated in<br />

accordance with the GEC ESTRO recommendations. We have<br />

delineated GTV, HR CTV on T2 weighted images.<br />

: We prescribed the dose <strong>of</strong> 6Gy X4# to HR CTV. Volume<br />

optimization was done in Varian Brachyvision. Dose–volume histograms<br />

were calculated to evaluate doses to tumour, target volumes and<br />

<strong>org</strong>ans at risk. Dose values were biologically normalised to equivalent<br />

doses in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2, equivalent to 50 cGy/h low dose rate)<br />

applying the linearquadratic model. The average tumor volume was<br />

58.8cc.The 3D dose volume parameters were D90 (6.65Gy) 87 EQD2,<br />

D<strong>10</strong>0 (5.25Gy) 77Gy EQD2, V15028.4cc, V200 15.67cc and the Dose<br />

to 2cc Rectum79 Gy EQD2, bladder 81Gy EQD2.<br />

: MR Based Interstitial <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> using PEEK catheters<br />

and GYN GECESTRO Guidelines is feasible. Further refinement and<br />

improvement in dose volume parameters especially rectum for pure<br />

interstitial HDR brachytherapy needs to be defined.<br />

PO248<br />

GYNAECOLOGICAL BRACHYTHERAPY: USING A SPREADING APPLICATOR<br />

TO INDIVIDUALIZE DOSE TO THE VAGINAL APEX<br />

J. Biesta 1 , L. KwakkelHuizenga 1 , T. Stam 1 , P. Koper 1 , T. Oorschot<br />

van 1 , M. Mast 1 , E. Kouwenhoven 1<br />

1<br />

Radiotherapy Centre West, Radiotherapy, Den Haag, The<br />

Netherlands<br />

: When using a standard applicator, the dose to the<br />

mucosa <strong>of</strong> the vaginal apex is <strong>of</strong>ten too low, since the vaginal fold at<br />

the top is generally wider than in the lower part. We, therefore,<br />

developed a vaginal applicator which can be expanded thus providing<br />

an optimal coverage <strong>of</strong> the mucosa <strong>of</strong> the vagina. Purpose <strong>of</strong> the study<br />

is to investigate the mucosal coverage using this applicator.<br />

: The spreading applicator consists <strong>of</strong> two<br />

identical parts that hinge at 7 cm from the top. The applicator is<br />

covered by a condom to ensure that no vaginal tissue will be caught<br />

between the two spreading parts.<br />

In ten patients two CTscans were made, one with the applicator<br />

closed and one with the applicator fully opened. In both scans vaginal<br />

contrast was used.<br />

The volume <strong>of</strong> contrast and air around the applicator was delineated<br />

in both scans and compared, see the figure. These volumes were<br />

determined for the cranial 5 cm <strong>of</strong> the vagina.<br />

: In the table the air/contrast volumes <strong>of</strong> both scans are<br />

presented.<br />

Patient Opened (cm 3 ) Closed (cm 3 )<br />

1 2.8 7.5<br />

2 3.6 <strong>10</strong>.3<br />

3 0.3 0.5<br />

4 0.0 0.0<br />

5 0.0 0.2<br />

6 0.6 3.7<br />

7 1.3 2.2<br />

8 0.7 2.1<br />

9 0.0 0.0<br />

<strong>10</strong> 0.0 0.6<br />

Mean 0.9 2.7<br />

SD 1.3 3.5<br />

: In 7 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>10</strong> patients we demonstrated that the<br />

mucosal coverage by the closed applicator was less optimal than by<br />

the opened applicator. This could lead to an underdosage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

vaginal mucosa. Further research will be performed and presented to<br />

show the effect on the isodose pattern using both applicator types.<br />

PO249<br />

HDR BRACHYTHERAPY BOOST IN GYNAECOLOGICAL CANCERS, WHAT'S<br />

THE PERFECT TIMING TO PREVENT VAGINAL STENOSIS?<br />

F. Piro 1 , D. Cosentino 1 , P. Indrieri 1 , P. Ziccarelli 1 , L. Ziccarelli 1 , L.<br />

Marafioti 1<br />

1 Mariano Santo, Radiotherapy, Cosenza, Italy<br />

: To evaluate the best timing schedule, after or<br />

before 3D conformal radiotherapy (ERT), <strong>of</strong> high dose rate<br />

brachytherapy boost (BBRT) in gynaecological cancers in an<br />

experience <strong>of</strong> the unique regional Center performing BBRT.<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S <strong>10</strong>1<br />

: From January 2009 196 pts. with endometrial<br />

cancer were treated with BBRT plus ERT in postoperative setting as<br />

out patients. The treatment schedule was 18 Gy in 3 fractions as<br />

boost before ERT to pts. <strong>of</strong> our Center (group A), to pts. by others<br />

Centers BBRT (group B) was performed after ERT (conformal 3D<br />

radiotherapy in both cases) the dose was prescribed to 5 mm from the<br />

surface <strong>of</strong> the applicator 3 cm the active length <strong>of</strong> the source. The<br />

implant optimisation was performed recognizing the bladder dose and<br />

the rectal dose as average <strong>of</strong> almost 3 points for each critical <strong>org</strong>an<br />

with a semi3D technique aided by simulator, the optimal targetdose<br />

volume was determined with radiopaque marker into the rectum and<br />

Foley catheter balloon in the bladder. We measured the lenght and<br />

the diameter <strong>of</strong> each vaginal cilinder so we calculated the volume <strong>of</strong><br />

treated vagina. By these data we enrolled a third observational group<br />

(C) consisting <strong>of</strong> only <strong>10</strong> pts. from our center with volume <strong>of</strong> treated<br />

vagina measured before and after ERT and finally underwent to BBRT.<br />

: In the group A we enrolled 116 pts. the others 70 in group B.<br />

The median lenght, diameter and volume <strong>of</strong> both groups resulted the<br />

same, while the recorded ranges <strong>of</strong> each parameter were different<br />

expecially for measured volume ( 7.530 cm³ for A versus 530 cm³ for<br />

B ).In the B group we also recorded pain during the introduction <strong>of</strong><br />

vaginal cilinder and acute toxicity G1G2 <strong>of</strong> bladder and rectum,<br />

requiring supportive care by ERT; so the vaginal introduction <strong>of</strong><br />

complete cilinder was more difficult than group A. In group C the<br />

median reduction <strong>of</strong> the measured volume <strong>of</strong> vagina resulted 25% (<strong>10</strong><br />

35%).In the group A the vaginal lenght at the first follow up after the<br />

treatment completation was the nearest to the lenght during the<br />

simulation. In the B group the BBRT was performed 23 weeks after<br />

the completation <strong>of</strong> ERT.<br />

: The use <strong>of</strong> HDR Brachitherapy to boost gynaecological<br />

cancers is widely accepted. Vaginal stenosis by Radiotherapy is an<br />

acute toxicity that starts at the beginning <strong>of</strong> treatment and increases<br />

using small vagynal cilinder, so to obtain a perfect timing for boost<br />

after ERT we need more collaboration with the neighbouring centers.<br />

Boost before ERT increases pts. compliance to treatment and probably<br />

reduces geographic missing.<br />

PO250<br />

CONCURRENT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY WITH HDR INTRACAVITARY<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CERVICAL CANCER: A PHASE II STUDY<br />

T. Toita 1 , R. Kitagawa 2 , T. Hamano 3 , K. Umayahara 4 , Y. Hirashima 5 , Y.<br />

Aoki 6 , M. Oguchi 7 , M. Mikami 8 , K. Takizawa 4<br />

1<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Ryukyus, Radiology, Okinawa, Japan<br />

2<br />

NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo, Japan<br />

3<br />

Kitasato University, Biostatistics, Tokyo, Japan<br />

4<br />

Cancer Institute Hospital, Gynecology, Tokyo, Japan<br />

5<br />

Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Gynecology, Shizuoka, Japan<br />

6<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Ryukyus, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Okinawa, Japan<br />

7<br />

Cancer Institute Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Tokyo, Japan<br />

8<br />

Tokai University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology,<br />

Kanagawa, Japan<br />

: A multicenter phase II trial was conducted to<br />

assess the efficacy and toxicity <strong>of</strong> concurrent chemoradiotherapy<br />

(CCRT) with highdoserate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDRICBT)<br />

using a low cumulative dose schedule in patients with locally<br />

advanced uterine cervical cancer.<br />

: The Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group<br />

(JGOG) study JGOG<strong>10</strong>66 enrolled patients with FIGO stage IIIIVA<br />

cervical cancer who had no paraaortic lymphadenopathy (> <strong>10</strong>mm) as<br />

assessed by CT. Patients received definitive radiotherapy consisting <strong>of</strong><br />

wholepelvis external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), pelvic EBRT with<br />

midline block, and HDRICBT. The cumulative linear quadratic<br />

equivalent dose (EQD2) was 6265 Gy prescribed at point A. Three<br />

dimensional planning using CT/MRI was not applied. Cisplatin (40<br />

mg/m 2 weekly) was administered concurrently with radiotherapy for 5<br />

courses. All patients received individual case review <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy<br />

quality assurance.<br />

: Of the 72 patients registered from 25 institutions between<br />

March 2008 and January 2009, 71 patients were eligible. Median age<br />

<strong>of</strong> the patients was 57 years. FIGO stages were IIIA in 3 patinets, IIIB<br />

in 64 patients, and IVA in 4 patients. Median tumor diameter, as<br />

assessed by MRI, was 55 mm. With a median followup <strong>of</strong> 28 months,<br />

21 patients had pelvic failure (primary=14, node=6, other=1), and 17<br />

patients developed distant metastases (paraaortic=11, lung=2,<br />

other=4). The 2year pelvic disease progressionfree rate (PDF) was<br />

73% (95% CI, 61% to 82%). The 2year progressionfree survival rate<br />

and overall survival rate were 66% (95% CI, 54% to 76%), and 90% (95%<br />

CI, 80% to 95%), respectively. The 2year cumulative late complication<br />

rates by grades were 24% for all grades, 9% for grade 1, <strong>12</strong>% for grade<br />

2, 3% for grade 3, and 0 for grades 4/5.<br />

: Despite a limited followup period, the JGOG<strong>10</strong>66 study<br />

demonstrated that CCRT using HDRICBT with a low cumulative RT<br />

dose schedule achieved comparable pelvic disease control to that<br />

achieved with global dose schedules (EQD2=85Gy), with a lower<br />

incidence <strong>of</strong> late toxicity for patients with locally advanced uterine<br />

cervical cancer.<br />

PO251<br />

IMPACT OF BLADDER DISTENSION ON ORGANS AT RISK IN 3D<br />

INTRACAVITARY BRACHYTHERAPY FOR GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER<br />

H. Bajwa 1 , K. Rehman 1 , I. Niazi 2 , M. Ali 2 , I. Haider 1 , S. Usman 1 , A.<br />

Masood 1<br />

1<br />

Shaukat khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital, Radiotherapy, Lahore,<br />

Pakistan<br />

2<br />

Shaukat khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital, Radiology, Lahore,<br />

Pakistan<br />

: To determine the effects <strong>of</strong> bladder distension on<br />

<strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OAR) in intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) for<br />

gynecological cancer with 3D Image Based Planning<br />

: Thirtytwo patients with gynecological cancer<br />

were treated with highdose radiation (HDR) brachytherapy, out <strong>of</strong><br />

which twentyeight were diagnosed with cervical cancer and treated<br />

with 700 cGy/fraction for 4 fractions and the remaining four were<br />

diagnosed with endometrium cancer and treated with 600<br />

cGy/fraction for 2 fractions. Pelvic CT scans were obtained from<br />

patients with indwelling catheters in place defined as empty bladder)<br />

and from patients who received 200 cc injections <strong>of</strong> sterile water in<br />

their bladders (defined as full bladder) for threedimensional (3D)<br />

analysis. Regions <strong>of</strong> Interest (ROI) were drawn by a radiologist for four<br />

<strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OAR): bladder, rectum, sigmoid colon and small bowel.<br />

All planning parameters including dwell positions and dwell times<br />

were kept constant for both plans. Dose Volume Histograms (DVHs)<br />

were used to compare the maximum dose and the mean dose <strong>of</strong> the<br />

OAR when the patient had empty bladder (Emax and Emean<br />

respectively) with the maximum dose and mean dose when the<br />

patient had full bladder (Fmax and Fmean respectively).<br />

: The Emean <strong>of</strong> bladder was 277cGy and the Fmean was<br />

208cGy (P = 0.000) and Emax <strong>of</strong> bladder was 17<strong>10</strong> cGy and Fmax was<br />

2298cGy (P = 0.000).<br />

The Emean <strong>of</strong> rectum was 196cGy and the Fmean was 198cGy (P =<br />

0.000) and Emax <strong>of</strong> rectum was 986cGy and Fmax was 951cGy (P =<br />

0.058).<br />

The Emean <strong>of</strong> sigmoid colon was 135cGy and the Fmean was <strong>10</strong>7cGy (P<br />

= 0.000) and Emax <strong>of</strong> sigmoid colon was 1792cGy and Fmax was<br />

899cGy (P = 0.000).<br />

The Emean <strong>of</strong> small bowel was <strong>10</strong>4cGy and the Fmean was 67cGy (P =<br />

0.000) and Emax <strong>of</strong> small bowel was 1469cGy and Fmax was 609cGy (P<br />

= 0.000).<br />

: This study shows that treating patients with full bladder<br />

results in reduced <strong>org</strong>anexposure in the case <strong>of</strong> sigmoid colon and<br />

small bowel. Although the maximum bladder dose was higher, the<br />

mean dose was less, reducing thereby the risk <strong>of</strong> complications. The<br />

rectal dose, however, was not affected by the bladder state.<br />

PO252<br />

ADJUVANT CARBOPLATIN/PACLITAXEL AND INTRAVAGINAL RADIATION<br />

FOR STAGE III SEROUS ENDOMETRIAL CANCER<br />

A. Kiess 1 , S. Damast 2 , V. Makker 3 , M.A. Kollmeier 1 , G.J. Gardner 4 , N.R.<br />

AbuRustum 4 , R.R. Barakat 4 , K.M. Alektiar 1<br />

1<br />

Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Dept <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />

Oncology, New York NY, USA<br />

2<br />

Yale School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Dept <strong>of</strong> Therapeutic Radiology, New Haven<br />

CT, USA<br />

3<br />

Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Gynecologic Medical<br />

Oncology Service, New York NY, USA


S<strong>10</strong>2 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

4 Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Gynecology Service, New<br />

York NY, USA<br />

: The optimal management for early stage high risk<br />

endometrial cancer is evolving. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is to report<br />

a single institution experience with concurrent adjuvant intravaginal<br />

radiation (IVRT) and carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy for early<br />

stage serous endometrial cancer.<br />

: From <strong>10</strong>/2000 to <strong>12</strong>/2009, 41 women with<br />

stage III (FIGO 2009) serous endometrial cancer were treated with<br />

surgery followed by high dose rate IVRT using Ir192 (median dose <strong>of</strong><br />

21 Gy in 3 fractions) and concurrent carboplatin (AUC=5) and<br />

paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) given every three weeks for six planned<br />

cycles. Each IVRT fraction was given in between cycles <strong>of</strong><br />

chemotherapy with an interval <strong>of</strong> at least 1 week between<br />

treatments. Patients with positive peritoneal cytology were excluded.<br />

Toxicities were recorded by CTCAE criteria (version 3). KaplanMeier<br />

methods were used to estimate survival, and the logrank test was<br />

used for comparison.<br />

: The mean age was 67 years (range, 5180 years). Surgery<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> hysterectomy (TAH/BSO in 51%, LAVH/BSO in 49%),<br />

peritoneal washing, omental biopsy, pelvic lymph node dissection<br />

(median 16 nodes), and selective paraaortic node sampling (in 93%,<br />

median 6 nodes). Thirty patients had stage IA disease (73%), 4 had<br />

stage IB (<strong>10</strong>%), and 7 had stage II, i.e. cervical stromal invasion (17%).<br />

Histology was pure serous in 68% and mixed in 32% <strong>of</strong> patients. Thirty<br />

five patients (85%) completed all 6 cycles <strong>of</strong> carboplatin/paclitaxel<br />

and 3 IVRT treatments. Six patients did not complete therapy due to<br />

allergy (1), physician preference (2), or toxicity (3). All toxicities (<strong>of</strong><br />

all grades) are presented in Table 1.<br />

With a median followup time <strong>of</strong> 58 months, the 5year diseasefree<br />

and overall survival rates were 85% (95% CI, 7396) and 90% (95% CI,<br />

80<strong>10</strong>0), respectively. The 5year actuarial recurrence rates were 9%<br />

in the pelvis, 5% in the paraaortic nodes, and <strong>10</strong>% at distant sites.<br />

None <strong>of</strong> the patients developed vaginal recurrence. Of the 4 patients<br />

with pelvic recurrence, 2 had isolated disease and were successfully<br />

salvaged. Patients with stage II disease had significantly lower<br />

diseasefree survival (71% vs 88%; p=0.017) and overall survival (71% vs<br />

93%; p=0.001) compared to patients with stage I disease.<br />

Table 1. Toxicity <strong>of</strong> combined adjuvant therapy.<br />

: Based on this study, concurrent adjuvant<br />

carboplatin/paclitaxel and IVRT provide excellent outcome for<br />

patients with early stage serous endometrial cancer. The subset <strong>of</strong><br />

patients with cervical stromal invasion (stage II) still represents a<br />

therapeutic challenge. The question <strong>of</strong> whether adjuvant IVRT and<br />

chemotherapy are superior to standard pelvic radiation will require<br />

further confirmation from the ongoing international randomized trial.<br />

PO253<br />

VAGINAL VAULT HDR BRACHYTHERAPY AS SOLE ADJUVANT THERAPY<br />

FOR ENDOMETRIAL CANCER<br />

A. Stillie 1 , M. Zahra 1<br />

1<br />

Western General Hospital, Clinical Oncology, Edinburgh, United<br />

Kingdom<br />

: To evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity <strong>of</strong> HDR<br />

vaginal vault brachytherapy as sole adjuvant therapy, following<br />

hysterectomy, for high intermediate risk endometrial cancer.<br />

: HDR vaginal vault brachytherapy was<br />

introduced in this centre in January 2009. Between 30/1/2009<br />

29/<strong>10</strong>/20<strong>10</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> forty patients, treated with adjuvant HDR<br />

vaginal vault brachytherapy as sole adjuvant therapy for endometrial<br />

cancer, were identified. Patients were treated with a single line<br />

source vaginal applicator (Varian Medical Systems) to deliver a dose <strong>of</strong><br />

7Gy per fraction to a depth <strong>of</strong> 5mm from the applicator surface. A<br />

total <strong>of</strong> three fractions were administered once a week with an<br />

overall treatment time <strong>of</strong> 14 days to deliver 21Gy in 3 fractions.<br />

: The median age <strong>of</strong> patients at diagnosis was 69. Patients<br />

were managed surgically with a TAH or TLH, BSO, and washings. One<br />

patient did not undergo resection <strong>of</strong> the cervix due to perioperative<br />

complications associated with their elevated BMI. The majority <strong>of</strong><br />

patients (65%) had FIGO Stage IB disease. Ten patients (25%) had<br />

involvement <strong>of</strong> the cervical glands. At a median follow up <strong>of</strong> 22<br />

months two patients (5%) have died from disseminated endometrial<br />

cancer. High risk features were present at diagnosis in one patient<br />

(LVSI, Grade 3, Clear Cell histology) however due to advanced age and<br />

significant medical co morbidities additional adjuvant therapy in the<br />

form <strong>of</strong> systemic chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy was not<br />

administered. The other patient had no high risk features present at<br />

diagnosis and developed pulmonary metastases, but no loco regional<br />

recurrence, within 6 months <strong>of</strong> adjuvant treatment. A third patient<br />

developed loco regional relapse and remains alive with stable disease<br />

following a course <strong>of</strong> palliative chemotherapy. In this case the initial<br />

pathology was reported as a grade 2 adenocarcinoma with no high risk<br />

features. Biopsy <strong>of</strong> the vaginal vault recurrence demonstrated a<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> serous papillary differentiation. A pathology review <strong>of</strong> the<br />

original specimen, following the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> relapse, confirmed no<br />

evidence <strong>of</strong> high risk features.<br />

Toxicity data was recorded at each clinic visit for all patients, there<br />

were no significant toxicities identified. Grade 1 vaginal stenosis was<br />

reported in a small proportion <strong>of</strong> patients.<br />

: HDR vaginal vault brachytherapy for high intermediate<br />

risk endometrial cancer is a well tolerated treatment associated with<br />

high rates <strong>of</strong> pelvic control.<br />

PO254<br />

HDR BRACHYTHERAPY FOR HIGH GRADE VAGINAL INTRAEPITHELIAL<br />

NEOPLASIA<br />

S.H. Mhlanga 1 , L. Pule 1 , F. Mohammed 2 , J.A. Kotzen 2<br />

1<br />

Charlotte Maxeke Hospital, Medical Physics, Johannesburg, South<br />

Africa<br />

2<br />

Charlotte Maxeke Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Johannesburg, South<br />

Africa<br />

: To determine the efficacy and safety <strong>of</strong> High<br />

Dose Rate (HDR ) <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> for High GradeVaginal Intraepithelial<br />

Neoplasia.<br />

: A retrospective study <strong>of</strong> patients treated with<br />

HDR <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> at Johannesburg hospital from 2007 to 2011 was<br />

performed by reviewing patient charts.There were 6 patients . A Dose<br />

<strong>of</strong> 54 Gy in 18 twice daily fractions <strong>of</strong> 3.0 Gy each was delivered to<br />

5mm from the surface <strong>of</strong> a personalized vaginal mould.<br />

: No patients have relapsed. There was one case <strong>of</strong> severe<br />

mucositis.<br />

: Fractionated HDR <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> appears to be an<br />

effective modality for controlling High Grade Vaginal Intraepithelial<br />

Neoplasia, with an acceptable complication rate.<br />

PO255<br />

HIGH DOSERATE INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY FOR GYNECOLOGICAL<br />

MALIGNANCIES<br />

N. Murakami 1 , T. Kasamatsu 2 , K. Takahashi 1 , K. Inaba 1 , Y. Kuroda 1 , M.<br />

Morota 1 , H. <strong>May</strong>ahara 1 , Y. Ito 1 , M. Sumi 1 , J. Itami 1<br />

1 National Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, Tokyo, Japan<br />

2 National Cancer Center, Gynecologic Oncology, Tokyo, Japan<br />

: The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is to retrospectively<br />

analyze the results <strong>of</strong> high doserate interstitial brachytherapy<br />

(HDRIBT) for gynecological malignancies.<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S <strong>10</strong>3<br />

: We reviewed the records <strong>of</strong> 39 patients with<br />

histologically confirmed gynecological malignancies who were treated<br />

by HDRIBT between 2008 and 2011 in our institution. Primary lesion<br />

was cervix in 21, vagina in 11, corpus in 4, ovary in 2, and vulva in 1.<br />

Thirteen patients were treated as a primary treatment, 18 as salvage<br />

for recurrence after prior surgery, 4 for residual lesion after surgery,<br />

and 4 as salvage for recurrence after prior radiation therapy.<br />

Squamous cell carcinoma was seen in 23, adenocarcinoma in 13, and<br />

the remaining 3 had other histologies. Median tumor size was 3.7cm<br />

(range 18cm). Thirty one patients were treated by radiation therapy<br />

alone and 8 patients were irradiated concurrent with chemotherapy.<br />

In the patients without prior radiation therapy, pelvic external<br />

irradiation was performed before HDRIBT. Median dose <strong>of</strong> pelvic<br />

irradiation was 30 Gy (range 2650 Gy). Either metallic or plastic<br />

needle applicators were used for HDRIBT. Median number <strong>of</strong><br />

applicators was 15 (range 529). Dose per fraction for HDRIBT was<br />

either 4 or 6 Gy and median fraction <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy was 4 (range 3<br />

9). Median clinical target volume (CTV) was 35.5 ml (range 2.4142.1<br />

ml), median CTV D90 was 6.16 Gy (range 4.388.15 Gy), median<br />

rectum D2cc was 3.47 Gy (range 0.995.81 Gy), and median bladder D2cc<br />

was 3.69 Gy (range 1.015.88 Gy). Median followup period was 16.3<br />

months (range 6.038.1 months). We calculated treatment result <strong>of</strong><br />

local control (LC), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival<br />

(OS). We also tried to identify the prognostic factors <strong>of</strong> LC and<br />

treatment complications using univariate analysis.<br />

: The 2year LC, PFS, OS for all patients were 73.8%, 51.9% and<br />

69.6% respectively. The frequency <strong>of</strong> local recurrence and distant<br />

metastasis was 23.1% (9/39 pt.) and 20.5% (8/39 pt.). Vaginal ulcer<br />

was seen in 3 patients, 2 <strong>of</strong> them were recurrence case after prior<br />

radiation therapy. Treatment indication as primary treatment, no<br />

prior chemotherapy, performance <strong>of</strong> pelvic irradiation combined with<br />

brachytherapy, and usage <strong>of</strong> concurrent chemotherapy showed<br />

tendency for good LC (p=0.<strong>10</strong>3, 0.06, 0.115 and 0.111). Regarding<br />

vaginal ulcer, prior radiation therapy before treatment was a<br />

statistically significant prognostic factor(p=0.034)<br />

: HDRIBT for gynecologic cancers both for primary and<br />

salvage treatment yields good result. Attention must be paid<br />

regarding vaginal ulcer for patients who had experience <strong>of</strong> prior<br />

radiation therapy and dose parameter predicting vaginal morbidities<br />

must be sought.<br />

PO256<br />

CT IMAGE GUIDED LOW DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CERVICAL<br />

CANCER: TRANSITIONING FROM 2D TO 3D, ARE WE THERE YET?<br />

C. Nelson 1 , V. Narra 1 , S. Motwani 1 , M. Gabel 1<br />

1<br />

Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />

Oncology, New Jersey, USA<br />

: Traditional lowdoserate (LDR) brachytherapy<br />

for cervical cancer utilizes 2D imaging and reference points<br />

approximating target dose and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OAR). Recent image<br />

guided brachytherapy (IGBT) advances with MRI compatible LDR<br />

applicators allow for 3D planning but are limited to facilities with MRI<br />

machines. For those facilities with CT simulators, the CTcompatible<br />

Henschke applicator (Mick RadioNuclear Instruments, Inc; Mount<br />

Vernon, NY) provides IGBT capabilities for LDR cervical<br />

brachytherapy. We report our initial institutional experience using CT<br />

guided LDR for cervical cancer.<br />

: Between December 2009 and September<br />

2011, definitive LDR brachytherapy was delivered in 19 consecutive<br />

treatments to 11 patients at Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital.<br />

All patients received 4547.6 Gy (median 45 Gy) <strong>of</strong> external beam<br />

radiotherapy to the whole pelvis. Intracavitary insertions were<br />

performed twice for 9 patients and a single insertion for 2 patients.<br />

CT scans were obtained and the intended dose prescribed to Point A<br />

was 90 Gy. OAR volumes for bladder, rectum, sigmoid and small bowel<br />

were contoured and the 1, 2 and 5 cc <strong>org</strong>an volumes were compared<br />

to ICRU reference point dose estimates.<br />

: Total Point A doses ranged from 84.7 to 92.9 Gy, with mean<br />

dose <strong>of</strong> 88.8 Gy. The mean rectal point dose (57.0 Gy) was 64% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Pt A dose, compared to the 1, 2, and 5 cc rectal volume doses <strong>of</strong> 78%<br />

(69.3 Gy), 76% (67.4 Gy) and 72% (64.0 Gy) respectively. Mean mid<br />

Foley balloon point dose (64.7 Gy) was 73% <strong>of</strong> Pt A compared to 95%<br />

(84.1 Gy), 91% (80.6 Gy), and 84% (74.6 Gy) to 1, 2, and 5 cc <strong>of</strong><br />

bladder respectively. Mean rectosigmoid point dose approximation<br />

(58.3 Gy) was 66% <strong>of</strong> Pt A compared to 1, 2, and 5 cc <strong>of</strong> sigmoid<br />

volumes doses <strong>of</strong> 76% (67.6 Gy), 73% (64.8 Gy) and 69% (61.1 Gy)<br />

respectively. Mean dose to small bowel was 81% <strong>of</strong> Pt A dose to 1 cc<br />

(72.3 Gy), 79% (70.6 Gy) to 2cc, and 75% (66.8 Gy) to 5 cc <strong>of</strong> bowel.<br />

The volumetric doses consistently exceeded ICRU point dose estimates<br />

to rectum, bladder and sigmoid by 118%, <strong>12</strong>5% and 111% respectively.<br />

With median follow up <strong>of</strong> 11.4 months, 9% <strong>of</strong> patients reported Grade<br />

<strong>12</strong> urinary toxicity, 18% Grade 2 dyspareunia and 27% reported pelvic<br />

pain requiring medication.<br />

: CT based imageguided brachytherapy allows for precise<br />

tumor and normal tissue dose calculations for LDR brachytherapy.<br />

However, traditional ICRU point estimates to predict rectal, bladder<br />

and sigmoid doses consistently underestimate volumetric doses to<br />

these <strong>org</strong>ans. In this series, CT imaging revealed small bowel adjacent<br />

to the uterus in the majority <strong>of</strong> cases that received substantial<br />

radiation dose. When transitioning from 2D to 3D brachytherapy<br />

planning, GECESTRO and ABS dose guidelines should be followed<br />

closely to minimize potential for <strong>org</strong>an toxicity. Target delineation<br />

and <strong>org</strong>an dose limits for CT based planning for LDR should build on<br />

the growing experience with MRI based LDR to define safe and<br />

effective dosing.<br />

PO257<br />

DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS (DVT) RATES IN PATIENTS RECEIVING<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CERVICAL CANCER<br />

A. Caley 1 , A. Hickman 1 , K. Frantzeskou 1 , E. Hudson 1 , K. Parker 1 , I.<br />

Appadurai 2 , R. Rayment 3 , S. Noble 4 , L. Hanna 1<br />

1 Velindre Cancer Centre, Clinical Oncology, Cardiff, United Kingdom<br />

2 University Hospital <strong>of</strong> Wales, Anaesthetics, Cardiff, United Kingdom<br />

3 University Hospital <strong>of</strong> Wales, Haematology, Cardiff, United Kingdom<br />

4 Royal Gwent Hospital, Palliative Care, Newport, United Kingdom


S<strong>10</strong>4 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

: Patients with pelvic malignancy have an<br />

increased risk <strong>of</strong> DVT but the incidence <strong>of</strong> DVT associated with<br />

brachytherapy for cervical cancer is unknown. A study was undertaken<br />

to assess the rate <strong>of</strong> DVT in this population.<br />

: Since April 20<strong>10</strong> all patients having<br />

brachytherapy for cervical cancer at our cancer centre have<br />

undergone weekly bilateral Doppler ultrasound scans (DUSS) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

lower limb veins for three weeks, at the time <strong>of</strong> each scheduled<br />

insertion. Patients receive mechanical thromboprophylaxis with TED<br />

stockings. The case records <strong>of</strong> the last 52 patients to have undergone<br />

brachytherapy prior to the introduction <strong>of</strong> DUSS were also examined<br />

to assess the incidence <strong>of</strong> significant thromboembolic <strong>events</strong>.<br />

: 32 patients were planned to have brachytherapy for cervical<br />

cancer. One patient developed a large pulmonary embolus during<br />

external beam chemoradiotherapy and did not have brachytherapy,<br />

and five others (16%) were found to have below knee DVTs at the<br />

time <strong>of</strong> their first brachytherapy insertion. Of the 31 patients who<br />

underwent brachytherapy, 3 (<strong>10</strong>%) developed asymptomatic below<br />

knee DVTs after one insertion and a further 3 (<strong>10</strong>%) after two<br />

insertions. Of the six positive cases at week 3, 3 had repeat DUSS at<br />

6weeks and all had resolved. All those with DVTs were treated with<br />

low molecularweightheparin as per local practice; one had clot<br />

progression to the popliteal vein and one developed bleeding<br />

requiring transfusion. Of 52 patients who received brachytherapy prior<br />

to the introduction <strong>of</strong> DUSS, 2 developed significant thromboembolic<br />

<strong>events</strong> (1 ile<strong>of</strong>emoral DVT and 1 bilateral pulmonary embolism) at 4<br />

months and 1 year respectively, both coinciding with significant<br />

disease progression.<br />

: There is a high incidence <strong>of</strong> asymptomatic below knee<br />

DVTs in this population but their clinical significance is uncertain.<br />

There are no guidelines to help with the management. The low<br />

incidence <strong>of</strong> symptomatic thromboses in the 52 patients prior to the<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> DUSS suggests that most asymptomatic DVTs do not<br />

lead to adverse outcomes.<br />

PO258<br />

CLINICAL RESULTS OF VAGINAL BRACHYTHERAPY DELIVERED WITH A<br />

RING APPLICATOR FOR ENDOMETRIAL CANCER<br />

P. Meijnen 1 , N. Bijker 2 , C. Koedooder 2 , B.R. Pieters 2<br />

1<br />

The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek<br />

Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands<br />

2<br />

Academic Medical Centre, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The<br />

Netherlands<br />

: Vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) delivered with a<br />

cylinder applicator (figure 1), with the reference isodose covering the<br />

proximal half <strong>of</strong> the vagina has become the standard treatment after<br />

surgery for highintermediate risk endometrial cancer. Since most<br />

recurrences develop in the vaginal vault we advocate the use <strong>of</strong> a ring<br />

applicator (RA) (figure 1) with the reference isodose covering the<br />

vaginal vault at 5 mm from the surface. Minimization <strong>of</strong> radiated<br />

volume would preferably lead to less vaginal toxicity and a better<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> life. In this report we analysed the number <strong>of</strong> vaginal,<br />

pelvic and distant failures after VBT delivered with a RA.<br />

Figure 1. cylinder and ring applicator<br />

: Between 2001 and 2009, 1<strong>12</strong> patients were<br />

referred to our department for VBT after surgery for a stage IA or IB<br />

(FIGO 2009) intermediate risk endometrial cancer. Surgery consisted<br />

<strong>of</strong> a total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo<br />

oophorectomy without routine lymphadenectomy. Medical files were<br />

retrospectively analysed. The KaplanMeier method was used for<br />

failure analysis.<br />

: VBT was delivered with a RA in <strong>10</strong>0 (89%) patients by LDR (26<br />

patients) or PDR brachytherapy (74 patients) to a total dose <strong>of</strong> 30 or<br />

28 Gy, respectively. 82 patients were diagnosed with high<br />

intermediate risk and 18 patients with lowintermediate risk<br />

endometrial cancer. 79 patients had stage IB (FIGO 2009) disease<br />

based on a least 50% myometrial invasion, 77 patients were 60 years<br />

or older, and 44 and 20 patients had grade 2 and 3 disease,<br />

respectively. Vascular invasion was present in four patients while five<br />

patients were diagnosed with a clear cell carcinoma. 15 patients had<br />

a history <strong>of</strong> previous malignant disease. Lymphadenectomy was<br />

performed in 13 patients. Median age at diagnosis was 65 years.<br />

Ninety percent <strong>of</strong> the patients underwent VBT within <strong>10</strong> weeks after<br />

surgery. At a median followup <strong>of</strong> 37 months (range 1<strong>10</strong>7) six (6%)<br />

patients showed failures. Three patients developed an infield<br />

recurrence in the vaginal vault 2, 30, and <strong>10</strong>1 months after VBT. One<br />

<strong>of</strong> these recurrences was isolated while the other two showed<br />

simultaneous pelvic and/or distant failure. A fourth patient developed<br />

an outfield recurrence in the posterior vaginal wall <strong>of</strong> the proximal<br />

half <strong>of</strong> the vagina including pelvic and distant failure. Two other<br />

patients showed only distant failure. The estimated 3year cumulative<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> any vaginal recurrence was 2.6% (95% CI, 06.3%). A total <strong>of</strong><br />

four (4%) patients died after disease progression within 3 to 13<br />

months.<br />

: VBT with the use <strong>of</strong> a RA covering the vaginal vault<br />

results in acceptably low vaginal failure rates. Since only one vaginal<br />

recurrence developed outfield <strong>of</strong> the vaginal vault, VBT delivered<br />

with a cylinder applicator with coverage <strong>of</strong> the proximal half <strong>of</strong> the<br />

vagina might be overtreatment resulting in unnecessary toxicity.<br />

PO259<br />

REEXAMINING ABS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR HDR VAGINAL<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY FOR UPSC OR CLEAR CELL ENDOMETRIAL CANCER<br />

M. Yondorf 1 , K. Holcomb 2 , D. Gupta 2 , T. Caputo 2 , P. Desai 1 , L.<br />

Nedialkova 1 , K.S.C. Chao 1 , B. Parashar 1 , D. Nori 1 , A.G. Wernicke 1<br />

1<br />

Weill Cornell Medical Center <strong>of</strong> Cornell University, Radiation<br />

Oncology, New York NY, USA<br />

2<br />

Weill Cornell Medical Center <strong>of</strong> Cornell University, GYN Oncology,<br />

New York NY, USA<br />

: The ABS recommends treating full length <strong>of</strong> the<br />

vagina (FLV) after hysterectomy in patients with Stage I and IIA (with<br />

less than 50%myometrial invasion) papillaryserous (UPSC) or clear cell<br />

(CC) endometrial cancer. We compare the rates <strong>of</strong> vaginal recurrence<br />

and acute toxicities in these patients treated with adjuvant HDR<br />

brachytherapy to FLV versus partial length <strong>of</strong> the vagina (PLV) [upper<br />

half or upper two thirds].<br />

: After obtaining an IRB approval, we<br />

conducted a retrospective analysis <strong>of</strong> 48 patients who underwent<br />

hysterectomy and complete surgical staging and were found to have<br />

Stages I or IIA (with less than 50% myiometrial invasion)UPSC or CC<br />

endometrial cancer and were treated with highdose rate (HDR)<br />

adjuvant brachytherapy between 2004 and 20<strong>10</strong>. These patients also<br />

received platinumbased adjuvant chemotherapy. The total HDR dose<br />

was 21Gy, in 7Gy per fraction, prescribed to depth <strong>of</strong> 0.5cm.<br />

Prescribed treatment length was FLV between January 2004 and<br />

October 2007, and PLV between October 2007 and January 20<strong>10</strong>.<br />

Follow up was every 3 months during 2 years and subsequently every 6<br />

months for 3 years and then annually after completion <strong>of</strong> treatment.<br />

Vaginal recurrences were assessed by physical exam and Pap smears.<br />

Acute toxicity was evaluated using the RTOG scale. Statistical<br />

considerations included logrank analysis and a paired ttest.<br />

: Of 48 patients in this study, 25/48 (52%) were treated with<br />

FLV and 23/48 (48%) were treated with PLV brachytherapy. The<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> subjects had Stage I disease: 88% and 86% in the FLV and<br />

PLV groups, respectively. There was a statistically significant<br />

difference in mean treatment lengths between 2 groups: <strong>10</strong>.5cm for<br />

FLV and 5.0cm for PLV (p


S<strong>10</strong>6 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

and NAG were 1.91 Gy (27% <strong>of</strong> Point A dose) and 1.85 Gy (26% <strong>of</strong> point<br />

A) respectively with a p value <strong>of</strong> 0.7. Mean Point BL doses in the AG<br />

and NAG were 1.89 Gy (27% <strong>of</strong> Point A dose) and 1.82 Gy (26% <strong>of</strong> Point<br />

A dose) respectively. The mean dose to rectal reference point was<br />

higher in the AG than NAG (5.09 Gy vs 4.49 Gy, p value 0.01). The<br />

mean dose to bladder reference point in the AG and NAG was 5.03 Gy<br />

and 4.90 Gy respectively (p value 0.6).<br />

Table 1. Dosimetric comparison with and without anesthesia.<br />

Numbers in parentheses represent standard deviation.<br />

: The results <strong>of</strong> our study reveal that HDRICBT dosimetry<br />

with and without anesthesia are comparable and therefore lack <strong>of</strong><br />

anesthesia does not compromise the HDRICBT dosimetry in cervical<br />

carcinoma patients.<br />

PO263<br />

DOSEVOLUME PARAMETERS IN CTBASED IMAGEGUIDED BRACHY<br />

THERAPY FOR CERVICAL CANCER<br />

K. Ando 1 , S. Kato 2 , M. Wakatsuki 3 , H. Kiyohara 1 , Y. Ohkubo 4 , K.<br />

Karasawa 3 , T. Nakano 1 , T. Kamada 3<br />

1<br />

Gunma University Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Radiation Oncology, Maebashi, Japan<br />

2<br />

Saitama Medical University International Medical Center,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Saitama, Japan<br />

3<br />

National Institute <strong>of</strong> Radiological Sciences, Research Center Hospital<br />

for Charged Particle Therapy, Chiba, Japan<br />

4<br />

Saitama Cancer Center, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology, Saitama, Japan<br />

: To evaluate the efficacy <strong>of</strong> the dosevolume<br />

parameters as predictor for local tumor control and late complications<br />

in cervical cancer patients treated with computed tomography (CT)<br />

based image guided brachytherapy (IGBT).<br />

: Fiftytwo patients treated with CTbased<br />

IGBT between June 2008 and August 20<strong>10</strong> were analyzed. Median age<br />

was 65 years (range, 30–89 years). The FIGO stages <strong>of</strong> their disease<br />

were stage I in 11 patients, II in 18, III in <strong>12</strong> and IV in 11. Cervical<br />

tumor size ranged from 1.4 cm to 9.8 cm (median; 5.0 cm). All<br />

patients were treated with a combination <strong>of</strong> external beam<br />

radiotherapy (EBRT) and CTbased IGBT with or without cisplatin (40<br />

mg/m 2 <strong>of</strong> body surface per week for 5 weeks). The median total dose<br />

<strong>of</strong> EBRT was 49.6 Gy (range, 39.6–50.6 Gy). IGBT was performed once<br />

a week, with the median total dose to point A <strong>of</strong> 24 Gy in 4 fractions<br />

(range, <strong>10</strong>–29 Gy). 3D dosevolume parameters <strong>of</strong> the highrisk and<br />

intermediaterisk clinical target volumes (HRCTV and IRCTV, D<strong>10</strong>0<br />

and D90) and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk (D0.1cc, D1cc, D2cc <strong>of</strong> the rectum,<br />

sigmoid colon, and bladder) were calculated from the dosevolume<br />

histograms according to the GECESTRO recommendation. The<br />

relationships between the 3D dosevolume parameters and the local<br />

tumor control or late complications were analyzed.<br />

: The median followup duration <strong>of</strong> all patients was 21 months<br />

(range 440 months). The 2year overall survival and local control<br />

rates for all patients were 94.9% and 78.8%, respectively. The 2year<br />

local control rate for patients with tumor size < 4 cm was <strong>10</strong>0%.<br />

Among patients with tumor size > 4 cm, the 2year local control rates<br />

for patients receiving HRCTV D90 > 60 Gy, and those with HRCTV<br />

D90 < 60 Gy were 81.4% and 58.2%, respectively (p = 0.02). For IR<br />

CTV, no statistically significant differences were observed in all DVH<br />

parameters. Eight (15.4%) patients developed late rectum<br />

complication and 3 (5.8%) developed late bladder complication. All<br />

complications were classified as Grade 1 or 2. For bladder, the<br />

median values <strong>of</strong> D2cc for patients with and without late complication<br />

were 86.9 GyEQD2 and 61.0 GyEQD2, respectively (p = 0.01). For<br />

rectum, no statistically significant differences were observed in all<br />

DVH parameters between the patients with and without late<br />

complication.<br />

: In the current study, it was suggested that 3D dose<br />

volume parameters <strong>of</strong> the HRCTV and bladder were effective<br />

predictors for local tumor control and late complication.<br />

PO264<br />

INITIAL CLINICAL FOLLOWUP ON THE USE OF A CO60 HDR SOURCE<br />

FOR CERVICAL CANCER BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

Y. Nagar 1 , A. Palmer 2 , L. Ioannou 3 , O. Hayman 3<br />

1<br />

Portsmouth Hospital NHS Trust, Clinical Oncology Department,<br />

Portsmouth, United Kingdom<br />

2<br />

Portsmouth Hospital NHS Trust (& Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering and<br />

Physical Science University <strong>of</strong> Surrey), Medical Physics Dept.,<br />

Portsmouth, United Kingdom<br />

3<br />

Portsmouth Hospital NHS Trust, Medical Physics Dept., Portsmouth,<br />

United Kingdom<br />

: There is no published clinical data on the use <strong>of</strong><br />

Co60 sources for HDR brachytherapy, compared to the more<br />

widespread Ir192 sources. This work reports initial clinical results<br />

using a Co60 HDR brachytherapy source for cervical cancers.<br />

: Retrospective data was analysed for 14 HDR<br />

brachytherapy patients treated with a Co60 source, who also<br />

received external beam radiotherapy +/ concurrent chemotherapy:<br />

50% stage IIb, 21% stage III, 29% stage IV. Patients were treated from<br />

June 20<strong>10</strong> to August 2011, with follow up to January 20<strong>12</strong> (11 patients<br />

> 1 year). Response rate and acute and late toxicity were analysed.<br />

Treatment plans were analysed to determine mean and range GEC<br />

ESTRO dosimetric parameters, with assessment <strong>of</strong> correlation<br />

between plan and toxicity.<br />

<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> treatment was delivered using the Eckert & Ziegler<br />

BEBIG HDRMultisource.<br />

: Complete response in 64% <strong>of</strong> patients, partial response in<br />

29%, and no response in 7% (n=1). Table 1 presents the recorded<br />

toxicities for the patient group.<br />

Table 1: Acute and late toxicities for 14 patients treated with EBRT &<br />

Co60 HDR brachytherapy for cervical cancer<br />

The mean APoint dose was 8.1 Gy, D90 5.7 Gy, V<strong>10</strong>0 71.8%, V150<br />

45.7%, bladder D2cc 86.1%, and rectum D2cc 71.3%. There was no<br />

statistically significant correlation between dosimetric metrics and<br />

toxicities in our limited data.<br />

: <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> using Co60 source results in acceptable<br />

acute and late toxicities, with excellent response rates in our early<br />

experience with a limited number <strong>of</strong> patients. We propose to present<br />

more mature data in 35 years.<br />

PO265<br />

CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES OF HDR SOURCE ANISOTROPY IN VAGINAL<br />

CYLINDER TREATMENTS<br />

S.J.E.A. Bus 1 , G.H. Olijve 1 , B.J. Oosterveld 1 , T.G. Janssen 1 , E.M. van<br />

der SteenBanasik 1<br />

1<br />

ARTI Arnhems RadioTherapy Inst., Radiation Oncology, Arnhem,<br />

The Netherlands<br />

: To evaluate whether compensation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

anisotropy <strong>of</strong> the HDR source used in the Flexitron afterloader has<br />

clinical relevance for dosimetric issues in vaginal vault brachytherapy<br />

applied with a vaginal cylinder.<br />

: In our institute postoperative vaginal<br />

brachytherapy is applied with a vaginal cylinder. The diameter <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cylinder is selected by clinical examination and the application is CT<br />

guided to avoid air gaps and to estimate D2cc <strong>of</strong> OAR.<br />

Treatment plans are made for 7 Gy prescribed at 5 mm from the<br />

cylinder surface and cylinder apex with <strong>10</strong>0% isodose around the<br />

cylinder from apex to the proximal half <strong>of</strong> the vagina. Previously, we<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S <strong>10</strong>7<br />

used to work with a microSelectron PDR but after installation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Flexitron HDR we found significant differences in the dose<br />

distributions due to source anisotropy caused by the larger HDR<br />

source. We compared PDR treatment plans (Plato BPS) with HDR<br />

treatment plans (Flexiplan) with various cylinder diameters (range 24<br />

cm), using the same dwell positions and dwell times and choosing the<br />

same dose points. We observed approximately 28% underdosage at the<br />

vaginal top in HDR plans compared to PDR plans, with a size at the<br />

surface <strong>of</strong> the cylinder depending on the diameter <strong>of</strong> the cylinder.<br />

It has always been assumed that positioning differences <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cylinder in regard to the vaginal mucosa for every fraction would<br />

average out the underdosage due to anisotropy. To evaluate the<br />

positioning <strong>of</strong> the vaginal mucosa in relation to the cylinder surface<br />

one haemoclip was sutured at the top <strong>of</strong> the vagina in the area where<br />

anisotropic dose is expected. Each fraction <strong>of</strong> HDR was preceded by a<br />

CT with corresponding slices. We repeated this procedure in 3<br />

patients, making 3 corresponding CTscans in each patient.<br />

: We found that in the CTscans made in 3 patients only one<br />

image showed a haemoclip shift >1.5 mm. Because <strong>of</strong> these findings<br />

we believe to have found sufficient evidence to assume that between<br />

fractions there is no significant change <strong>of</strong> the position <strong>of</strong> the mucosa<br />

in relation to the cylinder surface which could compensate for the<br />

underdosage in the anisotropy area.<br />

: We conclude that in HDR treatment underdosage due to<br />

source anisotropy at the vaginal top is a relevant clinical issue.<br />

Therefore we decided to optimize the dose in the anisotropy area by<br />

adjusting the dwell positions and dwell times in such a way that the<br />

maximum dose at the surface <strong>of</strong> the cylinder is the same as with the<br />

PDR treatments. The remaining small areas <strong>of</strong> under and overdose<br />

respectively at the top and laterally from the top have to be<br />

accepted.<br />

PO266<br />

IS AN MRI REQUIRED ON EACH FRACTION? AN EXPERIENCE WITH MRI<br />

GUIDED BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CERVICAL CANCER<br />

J. Chino 1 , J. Maurer 1 , B. Steffey 1 , J. Cai 1 , J. Adamson 1 , O.<br />

Craciunescu 1<br />

1<br />

Duke University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Durham NC,<br />

USA<br />

: MRI guidance has shown great promise at<br />

improving target definition and predictive dosimetric indices for the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy for cervical cancer. It is unclear, however, if use<br />

<strong>of</strong> MRI beyond the first fraction is useful in clinical practice. We<br />

examined our experience <strong>of</strong> using MRI with every fraction for<br />

variations among fractions that would suggest a meaningful difference<br />

in dose to tumor or normal tissue.<br />

: We retrospectively identified 6 patients<br />

treated with a combined total <strong>of</strong> 29 fractions in whom MRI guidance<br />

was used for treatment planning from 201<strong>12</strong>0<strong>12</strong> at Duke University<br />

Medical Center. Treatments were given twice a week after completing<br />

whole pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy, with a median<br />

<strong>of</strong> five fractions planned. 27 fractions were delivered with a tandem<br />

and ring applicator, 2 fractions were delivered with tandem and<br />

ovoids. On each fraction, a CT and MRI were obtained with the<br />

applicator in place, fused, and contoured as per the GECESTRO<br />

recommendations for target delineation (HRCTV) as well as for <strong>org</strong>ans<br />

at risk (OARs). Each plan was first generated using a theABS<br />

recommended reference lines then modified as necessary with a goal<br />

to meet the GECESTRO recommendations for HRCTV D90 and OAR<br />

D2cc. The total time for the treatment plan process was also<br />

recorded.<br />

: The median time from start <strong>of</strong> imaging to treatment delivery<br />

was 3.6 hours, not including insertion time (IQR 3.3 – 3.9 hours). The<br />

median HRCTV volume was 27cc (IQR 2231cc). Among individual<br />

women, the range <strong>of</strong> HRCTV volumes (maximum – minimum) among<br />

their fractions were 37 73% <strong>of</strong> the woman’s median (<strong>10</strong>28cc<br />

absolute range). In a subset <strong>of</strong> 20 MRI images sets, the HRCTVs were<br />

recontoured in a single sitting, with a range <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong>43% <strong>of</strong> the woman’s<br />

median (511cc absolute range). The median dose to HRCTV D90 was<br />

699cGy, and among individual women, the range <strong>of</strong> HRCTV D90 doses<br />

were 413% <strong>of</strong> the woman’s median (2686cGy absolute range). The<br />

median plan called for 311.4 sec nominal, and among individual<br />

women, the range was between 337% <strong>of</strong> the woman’s median (<strong>12</strong>.6<br />

84.2 sec absolute range).<br />

: The HRCTV volumes were variable between fractions,<br />

and resulted in variability in the plans developed to meet GECESTRO<br />

dose goals. This variability was less with retrospective 'single sitting'<br />

recontouring, but was still up to 43% <strong>of</strong> the median volume in some<br />

women. We feel that this was largely due to deformation <strong>of</strong> the target<br />

due to variations in applicator placement, rather than a change in the<br />

target volume due to treatment. However, MRI based treatment<br />

planning also requires significant time and resources, which should be<br />

factored into the decision to implement for all fractions.<br />

PO267<br />

3D DOSIMETRY OF THE BLADDER FILLING IN HDR VAGINAL CUFF<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

J. Kobzda 1 , E. CikowskaWozniak 1 , M. Michalska 1 , R. Makarewicz 2<br />

1<br />

Euromedic International Oncotherapy Center in Poznan,<br />

<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> Department, Poznan, Poland<br />

2<br />

Chair and Clinic <strong>of</strong> Oncology and <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>Centre <strong>of</strong> Oncology<br />

in Bydgoszcz N.Copernicus University in Torun, <strong>Brachytherapy</strong><br />

Department, Bydgoszcz, Poland<br />

: The aim <strong>of</strong> the study was to asses the bladder<br />

doses during vaginal cuff brachytherapy, to examine the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

bladder filling on normal tissue dosimetry using computed tomography<br />

and to establish standards <strong>of</strong> treatment.<br />

: A total number <strong>of</strong> 40 women were enrolled in<br />

a prospective clinical trial. Patients were treated in the lithotomy<br />

position using single source vaginal cylinder to deliver a dose <strong>of</strong> 6 7,5<br />

Gy per fraction to one third <strong>of</strong> the vagina at a depth <strong>of</strong> 0,5cm from<br />

the cylinder surface. A total dose was 30Gy in 4 fractions when alone<br />

high dose rate brachytherapy was used or 18Gy in 3 fractions when<br />

brachytherapy was combined with external beam irradiation. The<br />

cylinders' diameters were in a range <strong>of</strong> 2,53,5 cm. Patients were<br />

asked to consume 400ml <strong>of</strong> water 40 minutes before CT scans were<br />

taken. No contrast to the bladder was given. For each patient two<br />

treatment plans in 3D Flexitron Planning System were performed: one<br />

with full bladder and the other one when the bladder was emptied.<br />

Organs at risk and CTV were contoured by one physician and checked<br />

by another. While the OAR were contoured, the following rules were<br />

preserved: the bladder and rectum were delineated as the whole<br />

<strong>org</strong>ans; all the bowels (including sigmoid) visible 2cm above the<br />

cylinder and around it on the whole length <strong>of</strong> the cylinder. The dose<br />

volume histogram for all OAR as well as the parameters recommended<br />

by GECESTRO were reported.<br />

: As the most useful values for evaluation, the following<br />

parameters were taken into account for both, full and empty bladder:<br />

mean volume, V50, V80, D0.1cc, D2cc, D2cc <strong>of</strong> the bowels (Table 1).<br />

However, the dose to the bowels is only an estimate because <strong>of</strong> their<br />

high mobility and the difficulty in defining their borders.<br />

32 patients received a lower dose to the empty bladder than to the<br />

filled <strong>org</strong>an.<br />

8 patients received a lower dose to the full bladder than to the empty<br />

one. However, in this case the difference was only 0,25 Gy in average.<br />

Additionally, it was observed that in empty state <strong>of</strong> the bladder, the<br />

bowels were receiving a higher dose (comparing to the full state) as<br />

they were located closer to the cylinder. No correlation between the<br />

diameter <strong>of</strong> the cylinder and the dose to the bladder in full or empty<br />

state was found.<br />

: The results <strong>of</strong> this paper have shown, that in most cases<br />

the dose to the empty bladder is lower than when it is full. However,<br />

in the empty state <strong>of</strong> the bladder, the bowels receive higher dose.<br />

Early and late bowel toxicity should be investigated to establish clear


S<strong>10</strong>8 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

standards <strong>of</strong> treatment. In order to control and evaluate the dose to<br />

OAR, CTbased vaginal cuff brachytherapy may be used. The outcomes<br />

confirm other studies.<br />

PO268<br />

NOVEL MRIMARKERFLANGE FOR MRIGUIDED BRACHYTHERAPY FOR<br />

GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER<br />

J. Schindel 1 , A. Eagle 2 , M. Hewitt 2 , T. Stockman 2 , M.<br />

Muruganandham 1 , C. Pigge 3 , Y. Kim 1<br />

1<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Iowa, Radiation Oncology, Iowa City, USA<br />

2<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Iowa, Electrical Computer Engineering, Iowa City, USA<br />

3<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Iowa, Chemistry, Iowa City, USA<br />

: To develop a novel MarkerFlange that can be<br />

used in titanium or plastic applicators <strong>of</strong> tandemandring or tandem<br />

andovoid and evaluate its feasibility using seven different MRI marker<br />

agents.<br />

: A novel MarkerFlange was developed in<br />

house. A 5 L phantom (Figure 1.A) was used in combination with three<br />

MarkerFlanges placed around three titanium tandems (Varian). The<br />

phantom was filled with 4L <strong>of</strong> 3% Agarose Gel (AGEL: 3g Agarose<br />

powder/ <strong>10</strong>0 mL distilled water). A total <strong>of</strong> seven different MRI<br />

marker agents were tested: Saline, Conray60 (Mallinckrodt medical),<br />

CuSO4 (1.5g/L), liquid Vitamin E, fish oil, 1% AGEL, and a cobalt<br />

chloride complex contrast (C4) (CoCl2: Glycine=4:1) which was<br />

synthesized inhouse. A high resolution (3T) MRI was used. Clinical MRI<br />

scan protocols for GYN HDR were used: T1 and T2weightedMRI<br />

(T1MRI and T2MRI) <strong>of</strong> 1 mm and 3 mm slice thickness, respectively.<br />

The signal intensities <strong>of</strong> each MarkerFlange were then compared to<br />

the signal intensity <strong>of</strong> the 3% AGEL background using ImageJ s<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />

:<br />

The MarkerFlange showed hypersignals <strong>of</strong> > 500% with CuSO4 or C4 on<br />

T1MRI and <strong>of</strong> > 400% with Saline on T2MRI. Sourcereconstruction is<br />

recommended on T1MRI—the signals <strong>of</strong> CuSO4 and C4 on T1MRI were<br />

771 ± 187% and 558 ± 197%, respectively. The effect <strong>of</strong> artifacts<br />

caused by titanium was minimal. Five agents showed signals <strong>of</strong> > <strong>10</strong>0%<br />

on T1MRI: CuSO4, C4, Vitamin E, Conray60, and fish oil. All agents<br />

but C4 showed signals <strong>of</strong> > <strong>10</strong>0% on T2MRI. The signals on T1MRI<br />

showed better geometric accuracies in cranialcaudal direction when<br />

compared to those on T2MRI that show signal blurring <strong>of</strong> 4.64 ± 1.7<br />

mm due to 3 mm slice thickness. Further studies on the geometric<br />

accuracy <strong>of</strong> MarkerFlange signals, when compared to CT datasets, are<br />

planning to be followed. When combining with the use <strong>of</strong> the<br />

applicator library, the hypersignals <strong>of</strong> the MarkerFlange are<br />

expected to improve applicatorreconstruction accuracy for MRI<br />

guided brachytherapy for gynecological cancer, especially for, but not<br />

limited to, titanium applicators.<br />

: The use <strong>of</strong> the novel MarkerFlanges for MRIguided GYN<br />

HDR brachytherapy seems feasible. The markers <strong>of</strong> CuSO4 and C4<br />

showed considerably high signals on T1MRI, as Saline did on T2MRI.<br />

However, on T1MRI CuSO4 had the highest average signal intensity<br />

throughout the flange, and C4 had the highest maximum intensity<br />

readings, so future research will be done on these two promising MRI<br />

markers. The geometrical accuracy <strong>of</strong> the MarkerFlanges with 1 mm<br />

slice thickness was also promising and seemed to minimally affected<br />

by the artifacts that can be created by the titanium applicators.<br />

PO269<br />

EXTERNAL BEAM RADIOTHERAPY AND BRAQUITHERAPY ASSOCIATED<br />

CHEMOTHERAPY,IN IIBIV CANCER OF THE CERVIX<br />

Z. Mercedes 1 , I. Tovar 1 , J.A. Bullejos 2 , R. Guerrero 1 , P. Vargas 1 , M.A.<br />

Gentil 1 , I. Linares 1 , M. Martínez 1 , P. Expósito 1 , R. Del Moral 1<br />

1<br />

Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Radiotherapy Oncology,<br />

Granada, Spain<br />

2<br />

Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Medical phisics, Granada,<br />

Spain<br />

: Introduction: External beam radiotherapy (EBRT)<br />

and braquitherapy (BQT) associated with chemotherapy (CT) are<br />

standard treatment in cancer <strong>of</strong> the cervix.<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> HDR BQT has allowed the optimization <strong>of</strong> dosimetry and its<br />

application outpatient basis.<br />

Objectives: To analyze the clinical results <strong>of</strong> our study and evaluate<br />

the toxicity <strong>of</strong> this treatment.<br />

: From <strong>May</strong> 2005 to <strong>May</strong> 2011 were treated in<br />

our center fortyseven patients with a mean age <strong>of</strong> 51 years (3770)<br />

with this disease by chemoradiotherapy (45 50.4 Gy) plus HDR BQT<br />

overprint probe uterine central. Each patient received 4 or 5<br />

applications <strong>of</strong> BQT HDR.<br />

Tumor stage: 1E1, 2 E IIA, 34 IBD B, 3E III B, 3 EIIIC, and 4E IV. The<br />

maximum average diameter <strong>of</strong> the tumor is 5.7 cm<br />

We need a description <strong>of</strong> the GTV (gross target volume) and CTV<br />

(clinical target volume) prior to each treatment modification. The<br />

effective biological dose in GTV and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk, rectum and<br />

bladder was 67.32 Gy and 75.63 half 76.97 Gy respectively.<br />

: With a median follow more 2years we get a 81.8% pelvic<br />

control and overall survival <strong>of</strong> 99%. The toxicity was observed:<br />

Acute:18% proctitis, 27% cystitis and late: 9% stenosis vaginal.<br />

: Concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by BQT HDR is<br />

feasible and effective treatment for patients with advanced cervical<br />

cancer. It allows complete coverage <strong>of</strong> the GTV and CTV which is<br />

crucial for local control.<br />

PO270<br />

COMPARING CLASSIC AND MULTICHANNEL CYLINDRICAL VAGINAL<br />

APPLICATORS IN INTRACAVITARY GYNAECOLOGIC BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

A. Cerrotta 1 , M. Carrara 2 , M. Borroni 2 , C. Tenconi 3 , E. Pignoli 2 , C.<br />

Fallai 1<br />

1<br />

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Radiotherapy 2, Milan,<br />

Italy<br />

2<br />

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Medical Physics, Milan,<br />

Italy<br />

3<br />

Uiversità degli Studi di Milano, Physics, Milan, Italy<br />

: To compare dose distributions obtained by means<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 'classical' cylindrical and the multichannel vaginal applicator in<br />

intracavitary gynaecologic brachytherapy treatments.<br />

: Eight patients with primary or recurrent<br />

vaginal cancer were treated at the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto<br />

Nazionale dei Tumori with high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BRT).<br />

The prescribed BRT doses to the target were <strong>of</strong> 2000cGy (BRT as<br />

boost) and 3500cGy or 4200cGy (exclusive BRT), which were delivered<br />

in fractions <strong>of</strong> 500cGy or 600cGy, respectively. Out <strong>of</strong> 37 treatment<br />

fractions, a total <strong>of</strong> 24 were performed by means <strong>of</strong> a 'homemade'<br />

multichannel vaginal intracavitary applicator which contains a central<br />

catheter and five or six lateral tubes that are equally spaced around<br />

the surface <strong>of</strong> the cylinder. Retrospectively, a theoretical BRT<br />

treatment was planned on the same images adopting only the central<br />

catheter, simulating the use <strong>of</strong> the 'classical' cylindrical vaginal<br />

applicator which is commonly recommended as the standard<br />

applicator for vaginal treatments. Dosimetric distributions were<br />

obtained fulfilling for each single fraction the constrains <strong>of</strong> V2cc


S1<strong>10</strong> <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

PO273<br />

DETERMINING DOSIMETRIC FACTORS RELATED TO LOCAL CONTROL IN<br />

CTBASED BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

S. Kaplan 1 , K. Townamchai 1 , C. Newhouse 1 , A. Viswanathan 1<br />

1 Brigham and Women's Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Boston MA, USA<br />

: To determine the relationship between local<br />

recurrence (LR) and dosimetric values for cervicalcancer patients<br />

treated using CTguided, highdoserate brachytherapy.<br />

: A total <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>4 patients were treated for<br />

cervical masses using CTplanned brachytherapy between 4/2004 and<br />

3/2011. Of these, 5 patients with primaries that were noncervical or<br />

<strong>of</strong> unclear origin and 4 with Stage IV disease at diagnosis were<br />

excluded.<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 595 fractions were analyzed. Each patient had a median <strong>of</strong><br />

5 fractions (range [rg] 3 – <strong>10</strong>). Median perfraction prescription (Rx)<br />

dose was 5.5 Gy (rg 39). Twentytwo patients were treated with a<br />

tandem and ovoid applicator, 36 tandem and ring, 6 tandem and<br />

cylinder, 16 interstitial +/ tandem, and 35 with a combination.<br />

KaplanMeier progressionfree (PFS), diseasespecific (DSS) and overall<br />

(OS) survival estimates were calculated. To analyze dosimetric<br />

relationships, median average point A, median D90, and median Rx<br />

dose per patient were used to calculate several ratios: Rx/Point A,<br />

Rx/D90, and D90/Point A. Mean ratios were compared using 2tailed<br />

Ttests.<br />

: Stages were IA (n=2; 1.7%), IB (n=25; 21.7%), IIA (n=24;<br />

20.9%), IIB (n=49; 42.6%), IIIA (n=2; 1.7%), IIIB (n=11; 9.6%) and IVA<br />

(n=2; 1.7%). Staging for interstitial patients was: IB (1), IIA (2), IIB (5),<br />

IIIA (2), IIIB (4) and IVA (2).<br />

Median total external beam (EB) cervical dose in EQD2 was 44.3 Gy (rg<br />

42.560.3). Median cumulative Rx brachytherapy dose was 42.6 Gy (rg<br />

25.675). Median combined EB + brachytherapy dose was 86.9 Gy (rg<br />

67.3<strong>10</strong>2.9). Median cumulative CTD90 in EQD2 was 81.8 Gy (rg 38.3<br />

114.7). Median cumulative doses to 0.1cc (D0.1cc) and 2cc (D2cc)<br />

were 88.5 Gy3 and 72.8 Gy3 for the bladder, 75.1 Gy3 and 63.0 for<br />

rectum and 74.8 Gy3 and 63.1 Gy3 for sigmoid.<br />

Median followup time was 21.8 months. The 2year LR rate was 6.9%<br />

overall, 4.0% for the 99 noninterstitial patients and 18.8% for the 16<br />

patients treated with interstitial alone. For all patients, 2year PFS<br />

was 79%, DSS was 83% and OS was 78%.<br />

As seen in the table, the Rx/point A and D90/Point A ratios were<br />

significantly lower for patients with LR than for all others. This<br />

implies that patients who relapsed had larger tumors with the Rx dose<br />

close to Point A, and that Point A is a good approximation for tumor<br />

dose. CT is most beneficial for optimizing the normaltissue doses.<br />

LR Not LR P value<br />

Rx/Point A MR=1.002; n=9 MR=1.140; n=<strong>10</strong>1 0.001*<br />

(rg 0.891.15) (rg 0.76–2.11)<br />

Rx /D90 MR=1.024; n=8 MR=1.016; n=84 0.882<br />

(rg 0.91 1.28) (rg 0.672.36)<br />

D90 / Point A MR=1.020; n=7 MR=1.214; n=80 0.004*<br />

(rg 0.89 1.25) (rg 0.672.72)<br />

*MR=mean ratio<br />

: Dosimetric ratios incorporating point A may be useful<br />

metrics for clinics attempting to transition from plain film to CT<br />

and/or for those seeking a metric to determine adequate dosing to<br />

the CTCTV.<br />

PO274<br />

DOSIMETRIC IMPACT OF CTS WITH EACH FRACTION ON ORGANS AT RISK<br />

FOR HDR VAGINAL CYLINDER BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

L. Zhu 1 , O. Craciunescu 2 , J. Cai 2 , B. Steffey 2 , J. Adamson 2 , J. Chino 2<br />

1 Peking University Third Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Beijing, China<br />

2 Duke University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Durham, USA<br />

: To investigate the relevance <strong>of</strong> CTbased<br />

planning with every fraction versus first fraction CTbased planning on<br />

<strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OARs) for highdose rate vaginal cylinder brachytherapy<br />

(HDR VBT).<br />

: Fifty patients (201 fractions) who underwent<br />

HDR VBT for postoperative endometrial or cervical cancer were<br />

retrospectively analyzed in the study. CTbased 3D planning was<br />

performed at each fraction with prescription dose <strong>of</strong> 400700 cGy<br />

prescribed to 0.5 cm from the cylinder surface and for a treatment<br />

length <strong>of</strong> 46 cm. Two crude dose summation plans were made for<br />

each patient: (1) by multiplying the number <strong>of</strong> fractions and the<br />

treatment plan metrics <strong>of</strong> the first fraction (Sum1), and (2) by<br />

summing treatment plan metrics <strong>of</strong> all fractions (Sum2). D0.1cc, D2cc,<br />

and D<strong>10</strong>cc <strong>of</strong> bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and small bowel were<br />

collected and compared between Sum1 and Sum2. All data were also<br />

converted to equivalent dose at 2Gy per fraction (EQD2) for<br />

comparison. For 18 patients who had urinary catheterization in all<br />

fractions, ICRU 38 bladder and rectum points were also defined<br />

(PDICRU, B, PDICRU, R) and compared between Sum1 and Sum2. All<br />

statistical analyses were performed using paired t test.<br />

: For bladder and small bowel, the means <strong>of</strong> Sum1 were<br />

significantly greater than those <strong>of</strong> Sum2 (p


S1<strong>12</strong> <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

: Radical and salvage radiotherapy with brachytherapy<br />

achieves an acceptable locoregional control rates in patients with<br />

localized / locally advanced vulval cancers.<br />

PO279<br />

RADIOTHERAPY AND MULTIMODALITY TREATMENT FOR PATIENTS WITH<br />

LOCALLY ADVANCED UTERINE CERVIX CANCER<br />

T. Litvinova 1 , I. Kosenko 1 , O. Matylevich 1 , L. Furmanchuk 1 , G.<br />

Kostevich 1<br />

1<br />

N.N.Alexandrov National Cancer Center <strong>of</strong> Belarus, Department<br />

Gynaecological Surgery, Minsk, Belarus<br />

: Comparing the outcomes <strong>of</strong> multimodality<br />

treatment and radiotherapy in LAUCC patients.<br />

: The study enrolled 88 LAUCC patients. In<br />

group 1 (36 women) the treatment started with multidrug<br />

chemotherapy (MDCT) courses <strong>of</strong> cisplatin, gemcitabine or<br />

doxorubicin. The patients presenting resectable tumours (41.7%) were<br />

administered a brachytherapy (BT) treatment at a dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> Gy and<br />

type III hysterectomy or pelvic exenteration, the rest <strong>of</strong> the patients<br />

received combination radiotherapy (CRT). Group 2 (52 women) were<br />

treated with splitcourse CRT and cisplatin. The treatment started<br />

with externalbeam radiotherapy (EBRT) at a dose <strong>of</strong> 30 Gy. After an<br />

interval, 32 patients received BT at point A 5 Gy twice a week up to<br />

30 Gy and EBRT up to 20 Gy. The remaining 20 patients, also after an<br />

interval, continued the treatment with only EBRT up to a total dose <strong>of</strong><br />

20 Gy. The basic characteristics <strong>of</strong> patients in the both groups were<br />

comparable.<br />

: In group 1, 80% <strong>of</strong> the patients underwent radical surgery,<br />

and 20% received nonradical surgical treatment. Postoperative<br />

morbidity rate was 6.7%. In the course <strong>of</strong> 3year followup, only 2<br />

(13.3%) patients developed relapses. Observed overall survival (OOS)<br />

was 0.90±0.09, recurrencefree survival (RFS) was 0.89±0.1,<br />

metastasisfree survival (MFS) was 1.0. Among the patients<br />

administered MDCT and CRT, recurrence occurred in 1 (4.8%) patient,<br />

and metastases in 6 (28.6%). Threeyear OOS was 0.26±0.02, RFS was<br />

0.99±0.07, MFS was 0.39±0.18.<br />

In group 2, <strong>of</strong> 32 patients treated with CRT, <strong>10</strong> (31.3%) presented with<br />

uncured tumour, and <strong>of</strong> the remaining 20 patients, such cases<br />

amounted to 15 (75%), the number <strong>of</strong> women with relapses and<br />

metastases among them exceeding by 43.7%. Threeyear OOS was<br />

0.62±0.09 and 0.30±0.1, RFS was 0.90±0.06 and 0.74±0.1, MFS was<br />

0.70±0.08 and 0.63±0.1 respectively.<br />

: CRT for LAUCC patients, being a stardard treatment in<br />

Belarus, produces high rates <strong>of</strong> OOS, RFS and MFS, compared to EBRT<br />

alone without BT.<br />

The novel multimodality technique is more beneficial than CRT but it<br />

can be performed only in 41.7% <strong>of</strong> LAUCC patients.<br />

PO280<br />

PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF DOSE SUM OF PELVIC TOMOTHERAPY<br />

AND HDR BRACHYTHERAPY TREATMENT FOR CERVICAL CANCER<br />

S. Garelli 1 , S. Agostinelli 1 , A. Bellini 1 , F. Giannelli 2 , D. Doino 2 , S.<br />

Barra 2 , G. Taccini 1<br />

1<br />

IRCCS AOU San Martino IST, U.O.C. Fisica Medica, Genova, Italy<br />

2<br />

IRCCS AOU San Martino IST, U.O.S. Radioterapia Infantile e<br />

Tecniche Speciali, Genova, Italy<br />

: To evaluate the feasibility <strong>of</strong> dose summation <strong>of</strong><br />

tomotherapy whole pelvic irradiation (TWPI) with simultaneously<br />

integrated boost (SIB) and the high dose rate (HDR) intracavitary<br />

brachytherapy boost treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer.<br />

: Three patients with FIGO IIIIIIVA uterine<br />

cervix cancer received concurrent chemoradiation with pelvic helical<br />

tomotherapy (HiArt) irradiation including SIB to parametrium and<br />

involvedatdiagnosis lymph nodes followed by HDR intracavitary<br />

brachytherapy boost. TWPI dose was 45 Gy delivered in 25 fractions<br />

with a 57.50/53.7 Gy SIB, while the sequential HDR intracavitary (3<br />

channels Fletcher) brachytherapy boost dose was 2430 Gy/45<br />

fractions twice a week. For external radiotherapy, delineation <strong>of</strong><br />

target volumes was made according to ICRU Report 50 and 62. The<br />

ORs bladder, rectum, intestine and femoral heads were contoured.<br />

For brachytherapy all patients at every treatment session underwent a<br />

MR or a CT scan. HR and IR CTVs were delineated according to the<br />

Recommendations from GYN GECESTRO Working Group and ORs<br />

bladder, rectum and intestine were contoured in the CT scan. Given<br />

that the CTVs and ORs are displaced during the brachytherapy<br />

treatment because <strong>of</strong> the insertion <strong>of</strong> the intracavitary applicator the<br />

image fusion, and hence the dose summation, <strong>of</strong> the external<br />

tomotherapy plan with the brachytherapy plan is not trivial. We<br />

evaluated the feasibility <strong>of</strong> image fusion/dose summation <strong>of</strong> the two<br />

plans using MIM v.5.2 (MIM s<strong>of</strong>tware inc.) by looking how well the<br />

fused structures contoured on the brachytherapy plan matched with<br />

the ones contoured on the TWPI plan.<br />

: In the examined cases we tested the available MIM rigid<br />

image fusion tools (rigidassisted, boxbased, contourbased and<br />

pointbased) and found that no rigid fusion tool can provide an<br />

acceptable fusion. On the other hand the deformed image fusion<br />

provided improved and consistent results with overall good<br />

correspondence <strong>of</strong> the fused CTV and bladder volumes, while the<br />

match <strong>of</strong> the rectum volume was only fair. Deformed brachytherapy<br />

dose distribution was in general reasonable, but we noticed<br />

unacceptable strong distortion at the level <strong>of</strong> the cranial periphery <strong>of</strong><br />

the brachytherapy plan.<br />

: In our preliminary investigation we found that the<br />

deformed CTCT image fusion implemented in MIM 5.2 s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

provides a powerful tool to experiment dose summation <strong>of</strong> external<br />

beam and brachytherapy treatments. While the resulting deformed<br />

image and dose distribution seem 'reasonable', strong distortion <strong>of</strong><br />

certain areas can be present. In conclusion we can say that MIM’s<br />

deformed fusion proved to be a good starting point, but we think that<br />

for this demanding task the deformed fusion tool should be further<br />

improved maybe adding userdriven or pointbased deformation<br />

guidance. In progress the improvement <strong>of</strong> patients number to obtain<br />

also a quantitative analysis.<br />

PO281<br />

THE EFFECT OF BODY MASS INDEX ON MAXIMUM RECTAL DOSE IN HIGH<br />

DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CERVICAL CANCER<br />

J. Lim 1 , B. Durbin Johnson 2 , R. Valicenti 1 , R. Stern 1 , M. Mathai 1 , J.<br />

<strong>May</strong>adev 1<br />

1 University California Davis, Radiation Oncology, Sacramento, USA<br />

2 University California Davis, Biostatistics, Sacramento, USA<br />

: The impact <strong>of</strong> body mass index (BMI) on rectal<br />

dose delivered in high dose rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer is<br />

unknown. We investigated the role <strong>of</strong> BMI in volumetric rectal dose<br />

delivery during 3D CT based planning for locally advanced cervical<br />

cancer.<br />

: Between 2007 and 20<strong>10</strong>, there were 51<br />

patients treated with high dose rate brachytherapy for locally<br />

advanced cervical cancer. A retrospective chart review was conducted<br />

using the electronic medical record to determine the patients’ BMI. 97<br />

brachytherapy treatment planning CT scans from 51 patients with<br />

locally advanced cervical cancer were reviewed. The rectum was<br />

manually contoured from the ischial tuberosity to the pubic<br />

symphysis. Using the treatment planning s<strong>of</strong>tware, a volumetric<br />

measurement <strong>of</strong> the maximum, mean, dose to 2cc, dose to 1cc <strong>of</strong> the<br />

rectum was calculated. The ICRU rectal point was recorded, and a<br />

dose volume histogram was referenced. Linear mixed effect models<br />

were used to determine the effect <strong>of</strong> BMI, tandem angle, and other<br />

factors on dose while adjusting for the presence <strong>of</strong> multiple<br />

observations per patient.<br />

: The average BMI (kg/m2) was 28.5 with a range <strong>of</strong> 17.247.6.<br />

Of the study population, 6% were morbidly obese, 28% were obese,<br />

28% were overweight, 36% were normal weight and 2% were<br />

underweight. The mean D1cc, D2cc, mean rectal dose (%), and<br />

maximum rectal dose (%), and ICRU rectum was 304Gy, 278 Gy, 60%,<br />

and 20%, respectively. In multivariate analysis controlling for tandem<br />

angle, surface area, and maximum distension, there was a significant<br />

decrease in the D1cc rectal dose, p = 0.017, and D2cc rectal dose,<br />

p=0.016, ICRU rectal point dose, p=0.022, and mean rectal dose<br />

percentage, p=0.021 with an increase in BMI.<br />

: Obesity decreases the rectal dose given in high dose rate<br />

brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. The increase in<br />

fatty tissue in the retrouterine space may possibly contribute to<br />

sparing <strong>of</strong> rectal dose.<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 113<br />

PO282<br />

RADIOCHEMOTHERAPY AND HDR BOOST IN CERVICAL CANCER:<br />

ANALYSIS ON TOXICITY, A <strong>10</strong> YEARS SINGLE INSITUTION EXPERIENCE<br />

A. Colombo 1 , R. D'Amico 1 , C. Frigerio 2 , S. Sacco 1 , G. Sangalli 2 , F.<br />

Declich 2 , F. Placa 1<br />

1 A.O. della Provincia di Lecco, S.C. Radioterapia, Lecco, Italy<br />

2 A.O. della Provincia di Lecco, Fisica Sanitaria, Lecco, Italy<br />

: To evaluate the data <strong>of</strong> toxicity and relapses in<br />

patients with cervical cancer treated by a definitive regimen <strong>of</strong><br />

radiotherapy ± chemotherapy + high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR<br />

BRT) boost.<br />

: Patients affected by cervical cancer, every<br />

histotype and every stage, according to the results <strong>of</strong> multiple<br />

randomized clinical trials, were treated by a radiotherapy schedule,<br />

with or without chemotherapy, according to stage, age, and<br />

performance status <strong>of</strong> the patient. All patients were addressed to a<br />

HDR BRT boost.After the treatment the patients were followed by a<br />

clinical examination every six months, and an imaging evaluation (MRI<br />

or PETTC) every six months for the first two years.<br />

: Between 01/07/2000 and 30/06/20<strong>10</strong> 190 patients affected<br />

by cervical cancer (different hitotypes) were treated in our<br />

institution.40 were classified stage Ib1IIA1, 68 were stage IB2IIA2, 38<br />

were stage IIb, 35 were stage III, 9 were stage IVA. Pelvic limphnodes<br />

were positive in 56 patients (29.4%), and lomboaortic limphnodes (±<br />

pelvic nodes) were positive in 19 patients (<strong>10</strong>%).The median follow up<br />

was 29 months (range 1136.5).The schedule included a wholepelvic<br />

external beam radiotherapy <strong>of</strong> 45 Gy in 25 fractions with parametrial<br />

boost (when parametrial or sidewall disease and/or pelvic<br />

lymphadenopathy present) <strong>of</strong> 9 Gy and a HDR BRT boost, dose 2131<br />

Gy in 36 fractions, delivered to PTV. Every single BRT fraction was<br />

plannified by CT. A chemotherapy regimen <strong>of</strong> weekly cisplatin<br />

(40mg/mq) was used, according to disease stage and patient<br />

PS.Outcome measures included the toxicity (CTCAE 3.0), disease free<br />

survival (DFS) and local control.The gastrointestinal G2 toxicity was<br />

observed in 6.3% <strong>of</strong> patients and the G3 GI toxicity was observed in<br />

1%. We observed 1 case <strong>of</strong> G4 GI toxicity (0.5%).We found a<br />

relationship between EQD2 <strong>of</strong> 77Gy to 2cc <strong>of</strong> rectum and GI≥2<br />

(p=0.043) (fig.1).<br />

The genitourinary G2 toxicity was observed in 3.1 % and the G3 GU<br />

toxicity was observed in 1%. No G4 GU toxicity was reported.We<br />

reported one case <strong>of</strong> cutaneous toxicity and one case <strong>of</strong> G4<br />

neurological toxicity.The overall survival was 61% (116/190). The<br />

diseasefree survival was 64% (<strong>12</strong>1/190). The local control was 84.7%<br />

(161/190).The mean time to local recurrence was 38 months (range 1<br />

135 months). The mean time to distant recurrence was 36 months<br />

(range 2135 months).<br />

: The radiochemotherapy and BRT schedule as a definitive<br />

treatment is widely used for cervical cancer. The results in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

toxicity and DFS are comparable with the results <strong>of</strong> the literature; in<br />

clinical practise we adopted the limit <strong>of</strong> D2cc to rectum ≤ 77Gy.A<br />

detailed analysis must be done about the relationship between the<br />

sites <strong>of</strong> recurrence and the delivered dose, considering for the future<br />

BRT dose escalations, using Image Guided Adaptive BRT (IGABT).<br />

PO283<br />

NEOADJUVANT OR ADJUVANT BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CORPUS UTERI<br />

CANCER PATIENTS AT LOW RISK<br />

S. Mavrichev 1 , V. Suslova 2 , I. Kosenko 1<br />

1<br />

N.N.Alexandrov National Cancer Center <strong>of</strong> Belarus, Department<br />

Gynaecological Surgery, Minsk, Belarus<br />

2<br />

N.N.Alexandrov National Cancer Center <strong>of</strong> Belarus, Department<br />

Radiotherapy/<strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Minsk, Belarus<br />

: Evaluating the efficacy <strong>of</strong> neoadjuvant and<br />

adjuvant brachytherapy (BT) for stage I corpus uteri cancer (CUC)<br />

patients at low risk.<br />

: In 2011 our Centre started a prospective<br />

randomized study to evaluate the efficacy <strong>of</strong> neoadjuvant (group A)<br />

and adjuvant BT (group B) for stage I CUC patients at low risk. All the<br />

patients underwent surgical intervention: hysterectomy with bilateral<br />

salpingooophorectomy. Sixtyfour patients were administered the<br />

treatment; 27 in group A and 37 in group B.<br />

Neoadjuvant BT consisted <strong>of</strong> one traction at a single target dose <strong>of</strong><br />

13.5 Gy using Rotte Endometrial Applicator. The dose was delivered to<br />

the middle <strong>of</strong> endometrium. The application was performed the day<br />

before or on the operation day. For adjuvant BT, singlechannel<br />

colpostat was used. The dose <strong>of</strong> 8.5 Gy was delivered to the depth <strong>of</strong><br />

5 mm from vaginal mucosa. A total <strong>of</strong> two fractions was delivered<br />

with 7day interval, the total target dose being 17 Gy. The patients <strong>of</strong><br />

the both groups were treated at high dose rate on microSelectron<br />

HDR.<br />

: All the 64 patients received the prescribed treatment. One to<br />

<strong>12</strong> months followup found no severe radiation morbidity in vaginal<br />

mucosa. The vaginal stump healed by first intention.<br />

: Further accumulation <strong>of</strong> clinical material and followup<br />

<strong>of</strong> the patients are needed to evaluate early and late radiation<br />

toxicity caused by the two BT techniques.<br />

PO284<br />

OUR EXPERIENCE IN INITIAL 20 CASES OF CERVICAL CANCER WITH CT<br />

IMAGE BASED BRACHYTHERAPY TREATMENTS<br />

L. Carvalho 1 , A. Pereira 2 , R. Pirraco 2 , T. Viterbo 2 , M. Gomes 2 , L.<br />

Salgado 1 , L. Trigo 1 , J. Lencart 2<br />

1<br />

Instituto Português de Oncologia, Serviço Braquiterapia, Porto,<br />

Portugal<br />

2<br />

Instituto Português de Oncologia, Serviço Fisica, Porto, Portugal<br />

: Our institution has a big experience in the<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> cervical cancer, since the early 70´s, with<br />

brachytherapy as major component <strong>of</strong> the treatment plan. We began<br />

with radio implants, with hand calculations and in the 80’s we moved<br />

to cesium tubes, and then moved to cesium pelets using a Selectron<br />

137Cs, with treatment planning system calculations based in<br />

orthogonal images. Since 2003, we began to use a MicroSelectron<br />

Pulse Dose Rate (PDR), with the same type treatment planning.<br />

In 2011, we started CT based planning with CTMR compatible utero<br />

vaginal applicators. Dose prescription guidelines, dose points<br />

prescription and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk dose (OAR’s) derived from the<br />

Manchester System are described in the ICRU Report Nº38. Although<br />

this method has provided a large clinical experience, it presents big<br />

limitations that have been well documented. The implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

3D imagebased treatment planning systems, with target and OAR’s<br />

volumes delineation allows a better understanding <strong>of</strong> the tumour<br />

spatial configuration and provides a better target coverage and OAR’s<br />

dose evaluation. In this study we analyse our initial 20 cases <strong>of</strong><br />

cervical cancer brachytherapy treatments with 192Ir PDR using a CT<br />

image based planning, and the changes we felt it introduced in our<br />

technique, in terms <strong>of</strong> prescription points and OAR´s dose constraints.<br />

: 20 patients were treated with pelvic 3DC<br />

external irradiation, followed by a brachytherapy boost. Patients were<br />

treated with MicroSelectron V2 or with Flexitron PDR, and all plans<br />

were CT imagebased, using Oncentra Masterplan 4.1. All patients had<br />

a bladder catheter inserted, with the balloon filled with contrast, and<br />

a rectum catheter, containing a radiopaque marker. Target volume,<br />

rectum, rectal catheter, bladder wall and bladder balloon were<br />

delineated. The normal Manchester A points prescription was<br />

modified, following the coverage <strong>of</strong> target volume. Plans were


S114 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

analysed by DVH. The 0.1cc dose for bladder balloon, rectum<br />

catheter, bladder and rectum were calculated and compared.<br />

: The prescription dose points were changed in 40% <strong>of</strong> cases<br />

from the Manchester system to modified dose prescription points. The<br />

width <strong>of</strong> the <strong>10</strong>0% isodose at the level <strong>of</strong> classical point A varied<br />

between 1.6 and 2cm. The OAR´s 0.1cc dose was higher in the CT<br />

imagebased plans when compared with maximum dose points in the<br />

orthogonal image based plans, with the mean variations for bladder <strong>of</strong><br />

+26% (0 – 66) and rectum <strong>of</strong> +20% (0 – 37), respectively.<br />

: When gynaecological brachytherapy applications are<br />

performed using CT imagebased planning, the prescription dose may<br />

change and surrounding tissues are better spared. The physicians have<br />

a clear vision <strong>of</strong> what it is the real target volume and isodose<br />

distributions may be conformed to that target. The OAR’s doses are<br />

well known and the DVH analysis allows us to compare results, and<br />

also analyse other volumes <strong>of</strong> interest as D1cc and D2cc for rectum<br />

and bladder.<br />

PO285<br />

3D COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY GUIDED IMAGE BASED INTERSTITIAL<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CANCER OF CERVIX<br />

S. Sharma 1 , S. Rishi Kartik 1 , R.C. Alva 1 , P. Deka 1<br />

1 Manipal Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Bangalore, India<br />

: To evaluate the local control and toxicities in<br />

patients with locally advanced cancer <strong>of</strong> cervix undergoing interstitial<br />

brachytherapy planned with computed tomography (CT) imaging.<br />

: Between January 2008 and December 20<strong>10</strong>,<br />

29 consecutive clinically staged patients <strong>of</strong> carcinoma <strong>of</strong> cervix FIGO<br />

stages IBIIIB treated at our institution with curative radiation were<br />

analysed. None <strong>of</strong> the patients underwent Magnetic Resonance<br />

imaging as part <strong>of</strong> work up. All the patients received 45 Gy in 25<br />

fractions <strong>of</strong> whole pelvic external beam radiation planned by 3DCRT<br />

concurrent with weekly Cisplatinum 40mg/m 2 . A week later, patients<br />

underwent interstitial brachytherapy using Syed Neblett Gyn 3<br />

perineal template combined with intrauterine tandem insertion and<br />

two fractions <strong>of</strong> 6.5 Gy each were delivered by high dose rate<br />

brachytherapy system. The same was repeated after another week.<br />

CT scans were obtained after each application with 50 ml <strong>of</strong> dilute<br />

contrast injected into bladder and 20 ml into rectum. The outer<br />

boundary <strong>of</strong> the needles was used to define clinical target volume<br />

(CTV). The first application and CTV delineation was done according<br />

to the disease extent at diagnosis. Second application and the CTV<br />

delineation covered the disease extent present at the time <strong>of</strong><br />

brachytherapy. Thus the second CTV received 4 fractions <strong>of</strong> 6.5 Gy<br />

each (EqD2 = 80.1Gy). Rectum, bladder and sigmoid were contoured<br />

according to GECESTRO guidelines. Employing dose volume<br />

adaptation, dose to 2cc <strong>of</strong> bladder, rectum and sigmoid was restricted<br />

to 5, 4 and 4 Gy respectively ( EqD2 = 69.5, 63 and 63 Gy<br />

respectively). Although every effort was made to ensure that at least<br />

90% <strong>of</strong> CTV received the prescription dose, OAR constraints were<br />

strictly respected, even if that resulted in inferior CTV coverage.<br />

Clinical outcomes evaluated were locoregional disease control and<br />

toxicity.<br />

: The median age <strong>of</strong> this patient population was 54 (range 25 <br />

72) years. All 29 had squamous cell carcinoma histology. Stage<br />

distribution : IB2 3, IIA – 3, IIB –13 and IIIB –11. At a median followup<br />

<strong>of</strong> 19 (range 642) months, 28 (96.5%) patients had locoregional<br />

disease control as assessed by clinical examination. One patient each<br />

developed lung metastasis and second malignancy (breast cancer) at<br />

17 and 14 months respectively but were locoregionally controlled.<br />

Three (<strong>10</strong>.6%) patients developed RTOG grade I rectal toxicity. No<br />

patient reported bladder or sigmoid toxicity. Grade III late vaginal<br />

effects occurred in all patients and grade III in 4 (13.8%).<br />

: CT based interstitial brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> cervical cancer is<br />

feasible and results in excellent clinical outcomes providing very high<br />

locoregional control <strong>of</strong> disease with very low rates <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

related toxicity.<br />

PO286<br />

ASSESSMENT OF "OLD FASHION" GYNAECOLOGIC HIGHDOSERATE<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY STARTING POINT TO MODERN BT TECHNIQUES<br />

A. Vasconcelos 1 , M. Ferreira 1 , V. Mendonça 1 , M. J<strong>org</strong>e 1 , I. Monteiro<br />

Grillo 1<br />

1 Hospital Santa Maria, Radiation Oncology, Lisboa, Portugal<br />

: Carcinoma <strong>of</strong> the uterine cervix is the second<br />

most common cancer and the third leading cause <strong>of</strong> cancer death<br />

among women. For some decades combination <strong>of</strong> external beam<br />

radiotherapy (EBRT) and intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) has<br />

become a Radiotherapy standard treatment modality for cervix<br />

cancer. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is to assess dosimetry plan outcomes<br />

with highdoserate (HDR) ICBT planning orthogonal radiographs. For<br />

pts with cervix cancer throughout treatment prescription to standard<br />

Point A dose in the Manchester system.<br />

: Between December 2001 to November 2009,<br />

<strong>10</strong>6 pts with cervix cancer, were treated with EBRT and concomitant<br />

Chemotherapy + ICBT. Pts staged with FIGO staging system (6th ed.<br />

2002). Authors report a retrospective analysis <strong>of</strong> 94 patients (pts), <strong>12</strong><br />

pts did not complete ICBT. Pts presented stage IB in 11%, 14% for<br />

stage IIA, 66% for stage IIB and <strong>10</strong>% for stage IIIB disease. Initially<br />

treated with EBRT dose (box technique) between 41,450,4 Gy<br />

(1,8Gy/fx) with concomitant weekly CT (cisplatin 40 mg/m 2 ). Dose<br />

escalation was obtain with HDR ICBT prescription to point A 24Gy<br />

(6Gy/fx) within 34 weeks (EQD2=32Gy). With Intracavitary Rotte 'Y'<br />

applicators technique. Dosimetry study was performed with<br />

orthogonal radiographs and PLATO ® planning system. Local recurrence<br />

and two year disease free survival (Kaplan Meier model) were<br />

determinate. Major acute and late toxicity was evaluated with<br />

EORTCCTC.<br />

: Within this group <strong>of</strong> 94 pts, median age was 54 yearsold<br />

(range 2984). Cervix lesions size had median diameter 40 mm (range<br />

<strong>10</strong>80). Lesion was localized in 77% pts in exocervix, 17% pts in<br />

endocervix and 2 pts with both involved. Pathology determined 81%<br />

squamous cell carcinoma and 18% adenocarcinoma. Applicators with<br />

median tandem length <strong>of</strong> 7 cm (range 48cm) and median vaginal<br />

ovoids diameter 25mm (range 1530 cm). Dose variations observed in<br />

rectum median Dmax. 315cGy (range 155509) and bladder median<br />

Dmax. 418cGy (range 234531). Median total treatment time was <strong>10</strong><br />

weeks (range 320). With a median followup 45 months (range 7–98),<br />

4 pts had local recurrence and 14% distant metastasis. The twoyear<br />

disease free survival was 81%; 3 pts with acute grade 3/4 toxicity;<br />

Late toxicity: 9 pts with grade 3/4 gastrointestinal and 8 pts with<br />

grade 3/4 genitourinary toxicity (Dmax rectum 297486cGy and<br />

bladder 367460cGy).<br />

: Single point dose estimation using the reference point<br />

on orthogonal radiographs will underestimate the maximum bladder<br />

and rectum dose. However 3D entire intracavitary evaluation,<br />

underdosage regions can be recognized and optimize. These outcomes<br />

will endorse new era in ICBT, with CT imaging and dosimetric<br />

planning, following GECESTRO guidelines. Since individualized HDR<br />

ICBT treatment is recommended for all clinical stages <strong>of</strong> cervix<br />

cancer.<br />

PO287<br />

VOLUME RELATED HRCTV COVERAGE USING MRI BASED OPTIMISED<br />

TREATMENT PLANS FOR HDR BRACHYTHERAPY CERVIX TREATMENTS<br />

S. Aldridge 1 , M. Naeem 1 , N. Bozic 1 , A. Winship 2<br />

1<br />

Guy's and St.Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Medical Physics, London, United Kingdom<br />

2<br />

Guy's and St.Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Clinical Oncology, London, United Kingdom<br />

: Intracavitary brachytherapy (BT) plays a crucial<br />

role in the therapeutic management <strong>of</strong> patients with locally advanced<br />

cervical carcinoma. MRI is the gold standard for target and <strong>org</strong>an at<br />

risk (OAR) delineation for BT cervix treatments enabling the dose<br />

distribution to be conformed to the target for individual patients. We<br />

implemented MRI based 3D treatment planning for HDR BT cervix<br />

treatments following the GYN GECESTRO recommendations in <strong>May</strong><br />

20<strong>10</strong> and have now treated 25 patients. This work assesses the ability<br />

to cover the HRCTV with respect to volume size without exceeding<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 115<br />

the critical structure doses by using plan optimisation without<br />

interstitial needles.<br />

: Each patient received 3 individual applicator<br />

insertions. MR and CT scans were acquired for every BT fraction. The<br />

3D image sets were then fused; the MR images were used to delineate<br />

the target and critical structures (OAR), and the CT images were used<br />

for applicator reconstruction (Rotterdam). A standard plan was then<br />

viewed. The plan was optimised as required to keep the OAR doses<br />

below tolerance and to achieve the required target doses.<br />

: To optimise our plans we used a variety <strong>of</strong> techniques;<br />

removal <strong>of</strong> dwell positions from the top <strong>of</strong> the IUT, moving the dwell<br />

positions in the ovoids, using asymmetric dwell times in the ovoids or<br />

asymmetric ovoid sizes, and changing the normalisation value at point<br />

A. In the majority <strong>of</strong> treatments these optimisation techniques<br />

resulted in reduced OAR doses with the desired HRCTV D90 coverage.<br />

The graph below compares the HRCTV volumes against the LQ doses<br />

for the total treatment (including the EBRT dose) for the HRCTV D90<br />

and the corresponding D2cc doses for the OAR. The tolerance dose lines<br />

indicate the doses that are considered to be acceptable for the<br />

different OAR.<br />

HRCTV volumes up to 40cc were treated adequately (>75Gy but<br />

ideally >84Gy) without exceeding the OAR tolerance doses in 88% <strong>of</strong><br />

our cases.<br />

: Individual optimisation <strong>of</strong> treatment plans per fraction is<br />

required to account for differences in applicator position, <strong>org</strong>an at<br />

risk location and tumour response/position. Volumes greater than<br />

40cc are difficult to cover adequately with optimisation alone without<br />

exceeding the OAR doses. The addition <strong>of</strong> interstitial needles to our<br />

intracavitary technique may have increased the HRCTV dose in <strong>12</strong>% <strong>of</strong><br />

our patients. Our results with a volume <strong>of</strong> 40cc are comparable with<br />

that stated by the GECESTRO group for plan optimisation without<br />

needles.<br />

PO288<br />

A NOVEL COMPUTER PROGRAM TO SUPPORT MRGUIDED GYNECOLOGIC<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

J. Egger 1 , X.C. Chen 1 , T.K. Kapur 1 , A.N.V. Viswanathan 2<br />

1<br />

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology, Boston<br />

MA, USA<br />

2<br />

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Boston MA, USA<br />

: To describe a novel computer program designed<br />

and implemented to provide an overall system for supporting MR<br />

guided gynecologic brachytherapy.<br />

: From September 2011 to January 20<strong>12</strong>, <strong>10</strong><br />

gynecologiccancer patients requiring brachytherapy underwent<br />

imageguided applicator insertion in a multimodal operating suite with<br />

integrated MR scanner, ultrasound and PET/CT scanner. In order to<br />

increase the physician's speed and monitor the consequences <strong>of</strong><br />

inserting interstitial catheters in real time, a novel computer program<br />

was designed and implemented and is described here.<br />

: The overall system starts with preimplant imaging and the<br />

integrated s<strong>of</strong>tware permits measurement <strong>of</strong> relevant sizes for<br />

intervention leading to automatic inventory control and specific<br />

applicator request. Next, a device is selected (e.g., tandem and<br />

ring/ovoid +/ interstitial needles or interstitial needles alone) that is<br />

modeled in the preoperative images. Virtual modeling and<br />

visualization <strong>of</strong> several instruments for direct device comparison is<br />

enabled to identify the optimal one. In the intraoperative stage, the<br />

patient is imaged using 3 Tesla MRI with legs in the insertion position.<br />

The computervisualized template allows guidance to an optimal<br />

position for dose delivery. Serial imaging examinations are<br />

superimposed on the visualization <strong>of</strong> the modeled device. With this<br />

interactive novel s<strong>of</strong>tware program, the physician can select which<br />

interstitial needles may best benefit the patient, and at what depth<br />

they should be inserted, as determined by the MRI image viewed<br />

during the insertion process. The physician then inserts the correct<br />

interstitial needle into the necessary applicator hole based on the<br />

tumor location as visualized on intraoperative 3T MRI (see Figure).<br />

<br />

: Novel s<strong>of</strong>tware was developed that aids in the<br />

integration <strong>of</strong> preoperative assessment, intraoperative 3T imaging and<br />

applicator insertion. Novel features include 1) linking a diagnostic<br />

imaging set in realtime to a 3D CAD model <strong>of</strong> a medical device; 2)<br />

precise identification <strong>of</strong> catheter location in the 3D imaging model<br />

with realtime imaging feedback and 3) the ability to perform patient<br />

specific preimplant evaluation by assessing in the computer the<br />

placement <strong>of</strong> interstitial needles prior to an intervention via virtual<br />

template matching with a diagnostic scan.<br />

PO289<br />

MULTICHANNEL VAGINAL BRACHYTHERAPY: OVERKILL OR NECESSITY?<br />

S. Park 1 , J. Demanes 1 , M. Steinberg 1 , M. Kamrava 1<br />

1<br />

David Geffen School <strong>of</strong> Medicine at UCLA, Radiation Oncology, Los<br />

Angeles CA, USA<br />

: Singlechannel cylinder applicators are most<br />

commonly used to treat early stage endometrial cancers. Multichannel<br />

applicators have been developed to reduce the dose to <strong>org</strong>ans at risk<br />

(OARs) while optimizing dose to the target. The Capri (Varian Medical<br />

Systems) is a vaginal applicator with 13 channels. It is not clear how<br />

best to utilize all these channels for treatment planning. We<br />

conducted a dosimetry study using this device to determine the<br />

dosimetric advantages/disadvantages in utilizing various combinations<br />

<strong>of</strong> channels.<br />

: The Capri consists <strong>of</strong> a single central catheter<br />

(R1), an inner array <strong>of</strong> six catheters (R2), and an outer array <strong>of</strong> six<br />

catheters (R3). A total <strong>of</strong> 78 plans were generated by using 6 different<br />

catheter arrangements (R1, R2, R<strong>12</strong>, R13, R23, and R<strong>12</strong>3). The target<br />

volume was defined as a 2 mm circumferential shell extending 4 cm in<br />

length around the Capri device. A urinary catheter and contrast were<br />

used to assist in contouring bladder, rectum, and urethra. 3D plans<br />

were generated with the Nucletron Oncentra MasterPlan to deliver 6.0<br />

Gy per fraction to the target. An inverse planning simulated annealing<br />

optimization algorithm was applied to ensure the prescription dose<br />

covered >99% <strong>of</strong> the target and minimized dose to the OARs. Target<br />

coverage and OAR doses <strong>of</strong> the various catheter arrangements were<br />

compared. Statistical significance was evaluated with a twotail<br />

paired ttest to ruleout the null hypothesis that there is no difference<br />

between the reference plan R<strong>12</strong>3 (all 13 channels) and the various<br />

other plans.<br />

: Target Dose Coverage: Figure shows on average all plans had<br />

the same target coverage V<strong>10</strong>0 and D90 (p>0.05). Target hot spot: The<br />

V150 for R<strong>12</strong>3 (2.3%), R2 (1.5%), and R23 (2.7%) were similar (p=0.2).<br />

The R<strong>12</strong> had the smallest hot spot (1.1%, p=0.001). The R1 was larger


S116 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

(8.1%, p=0.02) and R13 was the largest (25.0%, p0.05). They were statistically better than all the<br />

other plans (p<strong>10</strong> on their pre treatment PET scan. 60% <strong>of</strong><br />

distant metastases occurred in patients with a nodal SUV >4 on pre<br />

treatment PET scan. In patients with 3 month post treatment PET scan<br />

(54%), 75% <strong>of</strong> patients with a SUV >4 suffered a local recurrence. 30<br />

month estimates for local control, disease free survival, metastasis<br />

free survival, and overall survival using KM curves are 80%, 30%, 42%<br />

and 65% respectively.<br />

: MRI based interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced<br />

cancers <strong>of</strong> the cervix and vagina results in a high rate <strong>of</strong> local control.<br />

Additionally, a HRCTV D90 > 95%, an initial staging PETCT SUV max<br />

><strong>10</strong> and a 3 month posttreatment SUV <strong>of</strong> >4 correlate well with local<br />

control. A pretreatment PETCT nodal SUV >4 may be a better<br />

predictor for distant metastasis than an SUV ><strong>10</strong> <strong>of</strong> the primary.<br />

Though longer followup is required, MRI based planning appears to<br />

provide initial excellent local control and distant metastasis free<br />

survival.<br />

PO293<br />

OUTCOMES FOR RECURRENT ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WITH HDR<br />

INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY UTILIZING MRI BASED PLANNING<br />

M.C. Biagioli 1 , J.M. Freilich 1 , A. Cruz 1 , A.S. Saini 1 , D.C. Hunt 1 , J. Shi 1 ,<br />

D.C. Fernandez 1<br />

1<br />

H. Lee M<strong>of</strong>fitt Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, Tampa Florida,<br />

USA<br />

: Recent data has emerged demonstrating<br />

significant advantages to MRI based planning over CT based planning<br />

in the brachytherapy treatment <strong>of</strong> cancer <strong>of</strong> the cervix. The purpose<br />

<strong>of</strong> this study is to evaluate our experience utilizing MRI based<br />

brachytherapy treatment planning for patients with recurrent<br />

endometrial cancers who underwent an interstitial implant as part <strong>of</strong><br />

there treatment.<br />

: A retrospective review was conducted <strong>of</strong> all<br />

endometrial cancer recurrences treated at M<strong>of</strong>fitt Cancer Center from<br />

20092011 where 1.5 T contrast enhanced MRI based high dose rate<br />

(HDR) interstitial brachytherapy was part <strong>of</strong> their treatment plan. <strong>12</strong><br />

patients were identified and local recurrence, disease free survival,<br />

metastasis free survival, and overall survival were analyzed in the<br />

whole group and based on prognostic features and treatment plans.<br />

: Mean followup was <strong>10</strong> months (range 216). 92% <strong>of</strong> patients<br />

had recurrent disease, 17% received chemotherapy and 83% received<br />

external beam radiation therapy with a median dose (range) <strong>of</strong> 4920<br />

cGy (43205500). Median (range) brachytherapy total dose and dose<br />

per fraction was 2500 cGy (22003500) and 500 cGy (450600),<br />

respectively. Local recurrence rate was 16.7% with estimated mean<br />

time to local recurrence <strong>of</strong> 13 months. In patients with the CTV D90<br />

greater than 95%, local recurrence was <strong>10</strong>% versus 50% if less than or<br />

equal to 95%. Disease free survival was 67% with estimated mean time<br />

to event <strong>of</strong> 9 months. Metastasis free survival was 80% in patients<br />

without metastatic disease on presentation with estimated mean time<br />

to metastasis <strong>of</strong> 7 months. Overall survival was 67% with estimated<br />

mean time to death <strong>of</strong> 9 months. 15 month estimates for local<br />

control, disease free survival, metastasis free survival, and overall<br />

survival using KM curves are 70%, 62%, 62% and 62%, respectively.<br />

: MRI guided interstitial brachytherapy results in a high<br />

level <strong>of</strong> local control in patients with pelvic recurrences after primary<br />

treatment for endometrial cancer. Though initial followup is short<br />

this local control appears to result in a high level <strong>of</strong> DFS. Of the 2<br />

local failures there was no pretreatment PET information available.<br />

Additionally, patient number was too small to determine the utility <strong>of</strong><br />

3 month posttreatment PET as a predictor for local or distant<br />

failures.<br />

PO294<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

TURKEY<br />

EXPERIENCE IN GYNAECOLOGICAL TUMORS IN<br />

I. Aslay 1 , B.W.G. <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> Working Group 2<br />

1<br />

Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Radiation Oncology, Istanbul,<br />

Turkey<br />

2<br />

Oncology Institutes, Radiation Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey<br />

: This study is conducted to evaluate the<br />

brachytherapy experience in gynaecological tumors in Turkey.<br />

: Gynaecological brachytherapy data <strong>of</strong> 11<br />

medical faculty, one government hospital and two private hospitals<br />

between 19702011 was collected. Ovarian cancer was not included.<br />

Median brachytherapy (BrT) experience <strong>of</strong> the centers was <strong>12</strong> (141)<br />

years. The total number <strong>of</strong> the patients (pts) was 297<strong>12</strong>4 and 7% <strong>of</strong><br />

them was gynaecological tumor (except ovary). The ratio <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tumors was %49 in cervix carcinoma (CC), %46 in endometrium<br />

carcinoma (EC), %1 in vagina carcinoma (VaC), %3 in vulvar carcinoma<br />

(VuC).<br />

: For curative treatment <strong>of</strong> CC concomitant chemotherapy<br />

(CCh) 40mg/m2 weekly was standard procedure in all centers. In<br />

postoperative CC , Cch was given if poor prognostic factors present<br />

such as positive margin, positive lymph node, bulky tumor, positive<br />

parametrium. Adjuvant Ch to radiotherapy was not given in any<br />

center. The incidence <strong>of</strong> the pts treated with curative intent in EC<br />

and VuC was low. Ch was given in EC pts if advanced stage or poor<br />

hystology was present. In VuC, Ch was given due to comorbidities <strong>of</strong><br />

the pts and also BrT was not applicated as a treatment component<br />

except in salvage therapy. VaC was treated mostly with the same<br />

protocol <strong>of</strong> CC. Salvage treatment was done with external<br />

radiotherapy (ERT) and/or BrT in two centers, with only ERT in 3<br />

centers and with cyberknife in one center. Eight centers have no<br />

salvage treatment experience. ERT technigues were 3D and IMRT in<br />

three centers, 3D in 7 centers, 2D and 3D in 4 centers. Except two<br />

centers with two and one center with 5 BrT machines all the others<br />

have one HDR treatment unit. BrT technigue was 3D in 6 , 2D in 8<br />

centers. Two centers also have LDR experience. ERT, BrT and total<br />

treatment doses are listed in table 1.


S118 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

: In gynaecological tumors BrT is an impotant component<br />

<strong>of</strong> the radiotherapy. In this study we found that there is a variability<br />

in the BrT techniques and doses between centers in Turkey. The<br />

<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> Working Group is continuing to collect data for further<br />

studies.<br />

PO295<br />

DOSIMETRIC GAIN OF UTRECHT INTERSTITIAL CT/MRI APPLICATOR IN<br />

CERVICAL CANCER HDRBRACHYTHERAPY<br />

C. Camacho 1 , F. Celada 2 , S. Roldán 2 , A. Tormo 2 , J.C. Morales 2 , V.<br />

Carmona 1 , M.C. GarciaMora 2 , F. Lliso 1 , S. Rodríguez 3 , J. Pérez<br />

Calatayud 1<br />

1<br />

Hospital Universitario La Fe, Radiation OncologyPhysics, Valencia,<br />

Spain<br />

2<br />

Hospital Universitario La Fe, Radiotherapy (Phy), Valencia, Spain<br />

3<br />

Clínica Benidorm, Radiation Oncology, Benidorm, Spain<br />

: The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is to check the<br />

potential gain, in dosimetric terms, <strong>of</strong> the Utrecht<br />

intracavitary/interstitial CT/MR applicator over the Fletcher<br />

intracavitary (Nucletron®) applicator for MRI imaging—guided HDR<br />

brachytherapy in cervical cancer patients.<br />

: Ten applications, using 6 needleUtrecht<br />

applicator, were analyzed in this study. For each application two<br />

theoretical different HDRplans were elaborates, manually optimized<br />

in MRI: (1) with needles and (2) without needles (Fletcher<br />

intracavitary applicator). Considering 45 Gy external beam, four ~7 Gy<br />

fractions were prescribed according to GECESTRO recommendations.<br />

After assessing DVHs for highrisk clinical target volume (HRCTV),<br />

intermediaterisk clinical target volume (IRCTV), bladder, rectum and<br />

sigmoid and doses converting to the equivalent dose in 2 Gy (EQD2),<br />

D90/D2cc quotients as HRCTV as IRCTV, for all OARs <strong>of</strong> two plans<br />

were obtained for comparison between them. Then D90/D2cc<br />

quotient <strong>of</strong> needleplan versus no needleplan was obtained.<br />

: Quotient <strong>of</strong> needleplan versus no needleplan were: in case<br />

<strong>of</strong> HRCTV 1,30[1,790,95], 1,21[2,1<strong>10</strong>,81] and 1,07[1,420,77] for<br />

bladder, rectum and sigmoid, and in case <strong>of</strong> IRCTV 1,46[1,971,15],<br />

1,33[1,671,08] and 1,19[1,461,01] respectively.<br />

: Although always according to GECESTRO<br />

recommendations, not all needleplans show a favorable ratio<br />

between HRCTV coverage and OARS doses. But as we are assessing IR<br />

CTV, all needleplans are favorable. In such cases, that planning is<br />

conditioned by a small HRCTV (e.g. complete remission after EBRT)<br />

and a wide IRCTV because <strong>of</strong> diagnosesGTV, interstitialBT is useful<br />

for right coverage <strong>of</strong> microscopic disease. The benefit <strong>of</strong> interstitial<br />

BT is shown in all other needleplans for both HRCTV and IRCTV.<br />

Sigmoid benefits the least from interstitialBT, but average is<br />

favorable. Bladder is most favored. On the basis <strong>of</strong> our results all<br />

patients benefit from the using Utrecht intracavitary/interstitial<br />

CT/MR applicator for MRI imaging—guided HDRbrachytherapy, so, in<br />

our institution, all cervical cancer patients are treated with Utrecht<br />

applicator.<br />

PO296<br />

CLINICAL AND DOSIMETRIC RESULTS OF HDR BRACHYTHERAPY GUIDED<br />

WITH MRI<br />

P. Antonini 1 , A. Tormo 1 , S. Roldán 1 , F. Celada 1 , C. Camacho 1 , V.<br />

Carmona 1 , J.C. Morales 1 , M.S. Rodríguez 1 , F. Lliso 1 , J. Pérez<br />

Calatayud 1<br />

1 Hospital Universitario La Fe, Radiation Oncology, Valencia, Spain<br />

: Summarize and report oncologic and dosimetric<br />

results <strong>of</strong> cervical cancer patients treated with magnetic resonance<br />

image (MRI) guided highdoserate brachytherapy (HDR BT).<br />

: Retrospective review <strong>of</strong> the records <strong>of</strong><br />

cervical cancer patients treated in our institution from September 07<br />

to march 20<strong>10</strong>. To be included in the study, the treatment had to<br />

fulfil the criteria: (1) include a previous treatment <strong>of</strong> at least 45 Gy <strong>of</strong><br />

external radiation (RTE) to the pelvis concomitant with cisplatin (2)<br />

the BT boost consisted in insertion <strong>of</strong> a Fletcher intracavitary<br />

(nucletron®) applicator under spinal anaesthesia and individualized<br />

MRI planning. Each treatment was composed <strong>of</strong> 2 applications (7 days<br />

apart), with 2 separated fractions <strong>of</strong> ~7 Gy (in 24 hours). All patients<br />

had squamous cervix cancer staged with FIGO’s 2009 classification for<br />

primary tumour size and AJCC 2006 classification for lymph node<br />

status. Tumour volume was also analyzed using EMBRACE protocol<br />

definitions. Toxicity scores were defined by CTCAE v 3.0.<br />

: 43 patients were found. The mean follow up for the entire<br />

group was <strong>12</strong> months (636). Mean patient age was 56 years. 82 %<br />

patients had FIGO tumours IIbIIIb and 76 % <strong>of</strong> them were N0 cases. 88<br />

% <strong>of</strong> patients had what EMBRACE defines as 'small tumours' or 'large<br />

tumours with good response to RTE'. The mean total cumulative dose<br />

was 76,2 Gy with mean D90 doses exceeding 85 and 65 Gy for HRCTV<br />

and IRCTV. ICRU in vesical and rectal points, maximal cumulative<br />

doses in 2 cm3 <strong>of</strong> bladder, rectum and sigmoid were, respectively:<br />

78.5; 82; 79.3; 61.2 and 58.2 Gy: Mean dose to H point was 71,7 Gy.<br />

Major (G3 or more) genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were<br />

present in 2 and 4 % respectively. Three (7 %) patients had local<br />

persistent disease, all <strong>of</strong> them with large tumour nonresponsive to RT<br />

and 2 <strong>of</strong> them also with uncontrolled systemic disease.<br />

: MRIguided HDRbrachytherapy, in accordance with GEC<br />

ESTRO recommendations, is a safe technique in terms <strong>of</strong> local control<br />

and toxicity. These clinical and dosimetric results compare favourably<br />

with traditional technique.<br />

PO297<br />

IMAGEGUIDED BRACHYTHERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT OF CERVICAL<br />

CANCER: RESULTS ON DIFFERENT PACKING TECHNIQUES<br />

B. Libby 1 , K. Ding 1 , E. Crandley 1 , K.A. Reardon 1 , B.F. Schneider 1<br />

1 University <strong>of</strong> Virginia, Radiation Oncology, Charlottesville, USA<br />

Historically, gynecological brachytherapy<br />

applicators have been placed in an operating room, with gauze<br />

packing used to both immobilize the applicator and to reduce dose to<br />

bladder and rectum by increasing their distance from the applicator.<br />

The patient is then moved to a CT scanner for 3D imaging, and then to<br />

the radiation oncology department for treatment. If the packing is<br />

inadequate, the treatment will either be suboptimal or will need to<br />

be aborted. With the advent <strong>of</strong> image guided brachytherapy (IGBT)<br />

suites with dedicated imaging systems, inadequate packing can be<br />

assessed and corrected prior to treatment. In this investigation we<br />

present the effectiveness in reducing critical structure doses and<br />

overall procedure time <strong>of</strong> IGBT by providing optimal packing and<br />

planning for cervical cancer patients treated with HDR.<br />

: Patients undergoing HDR brachytherapy had<br />

tandem and ovoid applicators placed in the IGBT suite, which has an<br />

operating room couch with carbon fiber insert, full anesthesia<br />

capabilities, a Siemens Somatom CT on rails, and a Varisource HDR<br />

unit. Vaginal packing was accomplished with either gauze or the<br />

Alatus balloon system. Before planning, the CT images were<br />

evaluated to determine whether the packing or balloon placement<br />

was optimal. For cases in which the packing was suboptimal, the<br />

packing was redone and the patient was scanned again for treatment<br />

planning. Patients remained in the scanning position during planning<br />

and treatment. For this evaluation <strong>of</strong> varying packing techniques all<br />

doses were prescribed to Point A, with the dose to the ICRU 38<br />

bladder and rectal points determined, as well as the D2cc and D1cc <strong>of</strong><br />

the bladder and rectum.<br />

:<br />

We present a range <strong>of</strong> dosimetric results for both gauze and balloon<br />

packing in Table 1. For a patient in which the Alatus system was<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 119<br />

used, the first insertion <strong>of</strong> the balloons was suboptimal, thus the<br />

predicted doses to the bladder and rectal points were suboptimal. Re<br />

insertion <strong>of</strong> the balloons was performed for optimal treatment. A CT<br />

scan after balloon removal also demonstrated their utility in reducing<br />

bladder and rectal doses. For a patient in which gauze packing was<br />

used, differences between optimal and suboptimal packing that occur<br />

during the procedure are shown. Optimal packing reduced the average<br />

time from applicator insertion to treatment to an average <strong>of</strong> 54<br />

minutes, as opposed to 70 minutes for suboptimal packing which<br />

would require being corrected before treatment. The reduced<br />

planning time allows use <strong>of</strong> less anesthesia for the patient.<br />

: Dedicated IGBT suites allow for the correction <strong>of</strong><br />

suboptimal vaginal packing, and a reduction in overall treatment<br />

planning and delivery time. In the context <strong>of</strong> IGBT, in which the<br />

applicator is placed and the treatment planning scans and treatment<br />

occur without movement <strong>of</strong> the patient, use <strong>of</strong> balloon packing<br />

systems may allow for more optimal packing than gauze packing.<br />

PO298<br />

ESTIMATION OF BOWEL DOSE FOR ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA TREATED<br />

BY HIGH DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY ALONE INITIAL RESULTS<br />

A. Zuchora 1 , L. Fahy 1 , M. Pomeroy 2<br />

1<br />

University Hospital Galway, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics, Galway,<br />

Ireland Republic <strong>of</strong><br />

2<br />

University Hospital Galway, Radiotherapy Department, Galway,<br />

Ireland Republic <strong>of</strong><br />

: To analyze the results <strong>of</strong> an initial study using<br />

oral contrast to improve the estimation <strong>of</strong> the dose received by the<br />

bowel during HDR brachytherapy (BT) treatment alone for<br />

endometrial carcinoma after total abdominal hysterectomy bilateral<br />

salpingooophorectomy (TAO/BSO).<br />

: The protocol for treatment endometrial<br />

carcinoma at Radiotherapy Department at University Galway Hospital<br />

is to use BT alone with total dose 25Gy in five fractions prescribed to<br />

0.5 cm from the vaginal surface with standard active lengths <strong>of</strong> 4 cm.<br />

BT treatment is delivered twice weekly. Since the beginning <strong>of</strong> 2011<br />

all patients treated with HDR cylinder insertion have been<br />

administered oral contrast. This analysis deals only with patients with<br />

BT treatment alone, without previous External Beam. Seven patients<br />

were included in this analysis, 5 patients FIGO I and 2 patients FIGO II.<br />

<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> was performed with vaginal cylinders (Varian) with<br />

diameters dependent on patient anatomy. Before each insertion <strong>10</strong> ml<br />

oral contrast Gastrografin (Bayer Schering Pharma 37 ml Iodine per<br />

<strong>10</strong>0ml) in a cup <strong>of</strong> water was administrated. The cylinder was inserted<br />

approximately 45 min1 hour later and Computer Tommography (CT)<br />

scanning using ACQsim Philips Medical System for dose planning with 3<br />

mm slice thicknesses was done. Contouring <strong>of</strong> Organs at Risk (OAR)<br />

and planning were prepared in the Brachyvision System Planning<br />

version <strong>10</strong>.0.34 after every insertion. Doses at Bladder, Rectum and<br />

Bowel in 0.1,1 and 2cc volume and point doses based on ICRU report<br />

38 were reported and recalculated to 2Gy Equivalent Dose(EQD) base<br />

on the radiobiological linearquadratic model(LQM).<br />

: Oral contrast administration is an easy procedure which is<br />

well tolerated by the patient. Organs in pelvic area can change the<br />

position after a TAO/BSO surgical procedure. The CT verification scan<br />

is used to contour the OARs and doses can be monitored using Dose<br />

Volume Histograms (DVH) tools. The bowel position is more clearly<br />

visible when oral contrast has been administered and 3D dose<br />

distribution can be calculated. This additional information can be<br />

used to modify the treatment if necessary to maintain OAR dose<br />

tolerances. For two patients in the study individual vacpack<br />

immobilization was used after the first fraction to move the bowel<br />

away from the high dose area, in this way decreasing the bowel dose<br />

during the subsequent treatments.<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> patients data shows the doses in 2 cc bowel volume were:<br />

Bowel average dose for one fraction 2.5 ± 1.3Gy<br />

Bowel average dose in 2Gy EQD for one fraction 3.1 ± 2.2Gy<br />

Bowel average total dose for full treatment in 2Gy EQD2 15.6 ± 8Gy<br />

: This simple procedure can help with estimation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

dose in bowel and possibly decrease late bowel symptoms. In some<br />

cases CT verification gives the option to change patient position using<br />

individual immobilization devices and move the bowel from the high<br />

dose region.<br />

PO299<br />

3D MRIBASED HDRBRACHYTHERAPY PLANNING AND IMRT FOR THE<br />

TREATMENT OF CERVICAL CANCER<br />

P.T. Dyk 1 , A.J. Apicelli 1 , B. Sun 2 , C. Bertelsman 1 , J. Kavanaugh 2 , J.<br />

Rolfingsmeier 1 , T.A. DeWees 1 , J.L. GarciaRamirez 2 , J.K. Schwarz 2 ,<br />

P.W. Grigsby 2<br />

1<br />

Barnes Jewish Hospital, Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, USA<br />

2<br />

Washington University in St. Louis, Radiation Oncology, St. Louis,<br />

USA<br />

: To evaluate dose volume parameters for targets<br />

and <strong>org</strong>ansat risk (OAR) using MRIbased HDRbrachytherapy<br />

treatment planning and IMRT in a series <strong>of</strong> patients treated at a large<br />

volume academic cancer center in the United States.<br />

: Between December 2009 and July 2011, 50<br />

patients with stage Ib1IVa cervical cancer were diagnosed and<br />

treated using definitive radiation therapy, with or without<br />

chemotherapy. Treatment consisted <strong>of</strong> external radiation therapy<br />

using IMRT directed at the cervical mass and pelvic lymph nodes using<br />

the PETCT simulation technique. All patients received 6 weekly HDR<br />

brachytherapy treatments beginning week 1 <strong>of</strong> IMRT. MRI simulation<br />

was used for each HDR fraction. The gross tumor volume (GTV) at<br />

each fraction was delineated using diffusion weighted and/or T2<br />

weighted images. Subsequent symmetrical expansions were made at<br />

3, 5, 7, and <strong>10</strong> mm to form highrisk clinical tumor volumes (HR CTV),<br />

avoiding the rectum, bladder, and sigmoid. Doses in 2 Gy equivalent<br />

fractions (EQD2) to the 90% and <strong>10</strong>0% volumes for each fraction were<br />

recorded and summed. Doses to the 2cc OAR's were recorded and<br />

summed. The mean dose from the IMRT plan for each OAR was<br />

summed to the 2cc dose. The D90 and D<strong>10</strong>0 <strong>of</strong> the cervical mass from<br />

the IMRT plan was summed to the D90 and D<strong>10</strong>0 for the GTV and HR<br />

CTV expansions. Patients were followed for local control and toxicity<br />

until censored or lost to follow up.<br />

: Median follow up was 9.7 months. Platinumbased<br />

chemotherapy was administered in 86% <strong>of</strong> the patients. All 50 patients<br />

completed the planned 6 brachytherapy fractions. The median dose to<br />

the cervical tumor and lymph nodes from IMRT was 20 Gy and 50.4 Gy<br />

in 28 fractions. Three <strong>of</strong> the 50 patients did not complete EBRT. There<br />

were 5 local failures at a median time <strong>of</strong> 4.4 months after diagnosis.<br />

The median D90/D<strong>10</strong>0 EQD2's for the patients who failed vs. those<br />

who did not for the GTV, HR CTV 3, 5, 7, and <strong>10</strong> volumes are listed in<br />

the table below:<br />

Failed<br />

locally<br />

Did NOT fail<br />

locally<br />

GTV<br />

(D90/D<strong>10</strong>0)<br />

HR CTV<br />

3mm<br />

39.4/60.5 Gy 34.4/49.9<br />

Gy<br />

71.9/<strong>10</strong>3.1<br />

Gy<br />

59.5/83.7<br />

Gy<br />

HR CTV<br />

5mm<br />

32.1/46.8<br />

Gy<br />

55.2/78.2<br />

Gy<br />

HR CTV 7<br />

mm<br />

30.4/44.1<br />

Gy<br />

38.1/55.7<br />

Gy<br />

HR CTV<br />

<strong>10</strong>mm<br />

27.7/39.8<br />

Gy<br />

33.7/49.1<br />

Gy<br />

There were 4 late grades 3 or 4 toxicities at a median <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> months<br />

following diagnosis. These were a rectosigmoid perforation, a recto<br />

vaginal fistula, and 2 vesicovaginal fistulaes. The median EQD2 2cc<br />

bladder dose was 85.0 Gy for those with a bladder complications<br />

compared to 92.2 Gy for those without. Both patients with VV<br />

fistulaes had initial IVa disease invading the bladder. The median<br />

EQD2 2cc doses for the rectum were 80.4 Gy for the 2 patients who<br />

suffered G3+ rectal complications compared to 70.8 Gy for those who<br />

did not. The EQD2 2cc for the sigmoid in the patient with the<br />

rectosigmoid perforation was 80.0 Gy vs. 68.4 Gy for the remaining<br />

patients.<br />

: Longer follow up and a greater number <strong>of</strong> patients will<br />

be needed to determine which dosevolume parameters best predict<br />

local control, and bladder, rectal, and sigmoid toxicity using our<br />

technique in the treatment <strong>of</strong> cervical cancer.<br />

PO300<br />

DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D BRACHYTHERAPY PLANNING<br />

G. Kemikler 1 , I. Aslay 2 , S. Kucucuk 2 , I. Özbay 1<br />

1<br />

Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Radiophysics, Istanbul, Turkey<br />

2<br />

Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Radiation Oncology, Istanbul,<br />

Turkey


S<strong>12</strong>0 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

: To compare dosimetrically 2D and 3D<br />

brachytherapy planning in the curative treatment <strong>of</strong> cervix carcinoma.<br />

: With the guidance <strong>of</strong> MR images that were<br />

taken before and after the external radiotherapy, CT based<br />

brachytherapy planning was performed in 5 patients.The CTMR<br />

compatible Fletcher applicators were used. Two different dose<br />

perscription and fractionation schedules were used for comparison <strong>of</strong><br />

2D Point A and 3D HRCTV. One radiation oncologist who is<br />

experienced in brachytherapy deliniated the target (HRCTV, IMRCTV)<br />

and OAR (rectum, bladder, sigmoid) volumes on CT images. In 2D<br />

planning normalization to Point A was done without<br />

optimisation.However in 3D planning reference dose was given to<br />

HRCTV with normalization and optimisation . Oncentra 3.1 version <strong>of</strong><br />

TPS was used. Dose schedules were 7Gy/ 3 fractions (EQD2=29,75Gy)<br />

and 6 Gy/4 fractions (EQD2=32Gy). Doses at 2 cc <strong>of</strong> OAR volumes were<br />

calculated. Paired ttest was used in statistical analyses.<br />

:<br />

The results are given in table1.<br />

HRCTV<br />

90%<br />

IMRCTV<br />

90%<br />

Rectum 2cc (Gy) Bladder 2cc (Gy)<br />

Sigmoid<br />

2 cc<br />

(Gy)<br />

Point<br />

196±26 133±36 14±5<br />

A 7x3<br />

20±3 15±4<br />

Point<br />

171±43 <strong>12</strong>5±39 16±5<br />

A 6x4<br />

23±3 18±5<br />

p:NS p:NS p:0,003 p:0,000 p:0,007<br />

Point<br />

196±26 133±36 14±5<br />

A 7x3<br />

20±3 15±4<br />

HRCTV<br />

<strong>10</strong>1±1<br />

7x3<br />

65±9 7±3 <strong>10</strong>±3 7±1<br />

p:0,022 p:0,019 p:0,021 p:0,006 p:0,005<br />

Point<br />

171±43 <strong>12</strong>5±39 16±6<br />

A 6x4<br />

23±3 18±5<br />

HRCTV<br />

<strong>10</strong>1±1<br />

6x4<br />

67±7 9±3 <strong>12</strong>±3 9±1<br />

p:0,020 p:0,023 p:0,031 p:0,006 p:0,007<br />

HRCTV<br />

<strong>10</strong>1±1<br />

7x3<br />

65±9 7±3 <strong>10</strong>±3 7±1<br />

HRCTV<br />

<strong>10</strong>1±1<br />

6x4<br />

67±7 9±3 <strong>12</strong>±3 9±1<br />

p:NS p:NS p:0,014 p:0,006 p:NS<br />

: In this study it was found that HRV, IMRV and OAR doses<br />

were higher in 2D (Point A) planning than in 3D (HRCTV) optimized<br />

planning. Thus, fewer side effects would be expected with 3D<br />

planning. In 3D planning, between 7x3 and 6x4 fractionation similar<br />

HRCTV 90% and IMRCTV 90% were found . But, significantly higher<br />

rectum and bladder doses were found in 6x4 fractionation. Therefore,<br />

7x3 fractionation can be prefered especially by busy clinics.<br />

PO301<br />

SOURCE POSITION LOCALIZATION FOR ICBT TANDEM & OVOID<br />

APPLICATORS UTILIZING ONCENTRA BRACHY APPLICATOR MODELING<br />

J. Kemp 1 , M. Price 1<br />

1<br />

Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Medical Physics, Baton Rouge LA,<br />

USA<br />

: Nucletron’s Oncentra Brachy Applicator<br />

Modelingplugin (AMp) may facilitate HDR cervical brachytherapy<br />

treatment planning whenimage quality inhibits dwell position<br />

localization. When registered with a ICBTpatient’s CT/MR, the AMp<br />

utilizes a 3D CAD rendering <strong>of</strong> the corresponding applicatorto define<br />

possible source dwell positions. As such, imaging artifacts thatwould<br />

normally inhibit the accurate selection <strong>of</strong> dwell positions<br />

viaintercolpostatic dwell position markers or measurement from an<br />

applicatorbasedlandmark will be <strong>of</strong> little consequence. Heret<strong>of</strong>ore,<br />

literature has lacked anyverification <strong>of</strong> the accuracy or utility <strong>of</strong> the<br />

AMp. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this studyis to compare the equivalence <strong>of</strong><br />

source localization within a CT/MRFletchertype tandem and ovoid<br />

applicator utilizing current clinical practiceand Oncentra’s AMp in a<br />

water phantom containing OAR surrogate structures.<br />

: KVCT image sets with 0.976mm x 0.976mm x<br />

1.25mm voxelswere acquired <strong>of</strong> a water phantom following clinical<br />

protocol containing bladderand rectum surrogates as well as an<br />

assembled Nucletron’s Fletcher CT/MRapplicator with various ovoid<br />

sizes (20, 25, 30mm) and a 30 o tandem.Using the Oncentra Brachy<br />

TPS, OARsurrogates were segmented and catheters<br />

werereconstructed using (1) institutional clinical protocols for T&O<br />

basedbrachytherapy (i.e. usingintercolpostatic dwell position markers)<br />

and (2) using the AMp. Treatment plans were then generated<br />

followingclinical protocol, which ensures a dose <strong>of</strong> 600cGy to the ICRU<br />

38defined PointA. The coordinates corresponding to the center <strong>of</strong><br />

each active dwell position,resulting from each method, were spatially<br />

compared. The dosimetric impact <strong>of</strong>these differences was quantified<br />

by determining D0.1cc, D1ccand D2cc for the surrogate OARs.<br />

: Preliminary results obtained for the 25mm ovoid/ 30 o tandem<br />

applicator demonstrate 80% <strong>of</strong> dwell positions definedutilizing clinical<br />

protocol and the AMp agree within 1mm with a maximum deviation<strong>of</strong><br />

1.17mm, both less than the resolution <strong>of</strong> the kVCT scan. Differences<br />

insource position definitions resulted in an increase <strong>of</strong> 2.9%, 0.48% and<br />

0.3% and0.66%, 0.87%, and 0.59% for D0.1cc , D1cc and D2ccfor the<br />

bladder and rectumsurrogates, respectively, when utilizing the<br />

AMprather than clinical protocol for source position localization. This<br />

limiteddata indicates that use <strong>of</strong> the AMp for dwell position<br />

localization isequivalent to our clinical practice.<br />

: Preliminary resultsindicate that source dwell position<br />

localization utilizing Nucletron’sApplicator Modeling plugin and our<br />

clinical protocol results in equivalentdosimetry for the simple, water<br />

phantom geometry investigated. Currently we are investigating the<br />

validity<strong>of</strong> this conclusion utilizing ovoids <strong>of</strong> different sizes as well as<br />

aCT/MRcompatible vaginal cylinder.<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S <strong>12</strong>1<br />

PO302<br />

COMBINATION OF EXTERNAL BEAM IRRADIATION AND LOWDOSE RATE<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY FOR INOPERABLE ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMAS<br />

A. Baumann 1 , C. CharraBrunaud 1 , S. H<strong>of</strong>fstetter 1 , D. Peiffert 1<br />

1 Centre Alexis Vautrin, Radiotherapy, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France<br />

: The standard treatment for early stage<br />

endometrial carcinoma is total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral<br />

salpingooophorectomy. However 3 to 9% <strong>of</strong> patients are inoperable<br />

because <strong>of</strong> comorbidities or age. Such patients can be treated with a<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and<br />

brachytherapy. The goal <strong>of</strong> this study was to update our experience <strong>of</strong><br />

combining EBRT and intracavity lowdose rate (LDR) brachytherapy for<br />

inoperable endometrial carcinomas.<br />

: The files <strong>of</strong> 56 patients treated at the Centre<br />

Alexis Vautrin between 1995 and 20<strong>10</strong> for inoperable endometrial<br />

carcinoma were reviewed. Seventyone per cent were stage I tumor<br />

(based on the 1971 FIGO classification), 11% stage II, 16% stage III and<br />

2% stage IV. The mean age <strong>of</strong> the patients was 70.1 years, and the<br />

mean BMI was 35.8 kg/m 2 . The EBRT dose to the pelvis was 30 Gy in<br />

the absence <strong>of</strong> involved nodes on imaging and 45 to 50 Gy in case <strong>of</strong><br />

involved nodes. The brachytherapy CTV was defined as the whole<br />

uterus plus the upper third <strong>of</strong> the vagina; most patients had 3D<br />

dosimetry based on CT imaging. The prescribed dose was 15 to 30 Gy<br />

to obtain a total CTV dose on the CTV <strong>of</strong> 60 to 65 Gy including EBRT<br />

dose.<br />

: At 5 years, local control, diseasespecific survival and overall<br />

survival were 84.4 %, 59.5 % and 36.8 % respectively. For Stage I<br />

histologic grade 1 patients, diseasespecific survival was 79.6 %.<br />

Eighteen patients (33 %) showed progressive disease, <strong>12</strong> <strong>of</strong> whom had<br />

an initial stage ≥ II. Only one patient with a stage I tumor developed a<br />

local recurrence.<br />

One patient presented with an acute toxicity grade 3 after EBRT. No<br />

severe acute brachytherapy side effects were observed. One patient<br />

suffered a thromboembolic event immediately after brachytherapy.<br />

Late effects <strong>of</strong> grade 3 or higher were seen in 5 patients, 1 rectal<br />

toxicity and 5 vaginal toxicities.<br />

: The combination <strong>of</strong> EBRT and LDR brachytherapy as<br />

exclusive treatment <strong>of</strong> medically inoperable patients with<br />

endometrial cancer is welltolerated and results in excellent local<br />

control rate. It should be recommended as an alternative treatment<br />

for stage I inoperable patients.<br />

PO303<br />

ANISOTROPIC DOSE MODEL OF INTRACAVITARY VAGINAL<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY USING MULTIRING INFLATABLE APPLICATOR<br />

H. Kuo 1 , R. Yaparpalvi 1 , K. Mehta 1 , L. Hong 1 , A. Wu 2 , D. Mynampati 1 ,<br />

W. Bodner 1 , M. Garg 1 , S. Kalnicki 1<br />

1<br />

Montefiore Medical Center, Radiation Oncology Department, Bronx,<br />

USA<br />

2<br />

Thomas Jefferson University, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiologic Science,<br />

Philidelphia, USA<br />

: An inflatable applicator (Capri TM , Varian, Palo<br />

Alto, USA) with thirteen lumens is designed with the advantage <strong>of</strong><br />

reducing air pocket, and conforming dose to patient tissues. It is<br />

arranged in two concentric rings (with six lumens each) surrounding a<br />

central lumen. This study investigates the efficacy <strong>of</strong> dose shielding to<br />

normal tissue with anisotropic planning models.<br />

: Anisotropic dose plans for Capri with 1/4,<br />

1/2, 3/4 treatment sectors were designed with sparing structures at<br />

0.5cm to 1cm depth from Capri surface on the opposite 1/4 sectors<br />

(OAR) (Figure 1). Reference plan with isotropic dose distribution with<br />

central lumen activated only (C) was also created. Planning target<br />

volume (PTV) was defined as 0.5cm depth from the surface <strong>of</strong> Capri<br />

enclosed within the treatment sector. Capri applicators sizes were<br />

varied by injecting 30cc, 40cc and 60cc water which corresponding to<br />

diameters 3.5cm, 3.7 cm and 4.2cm respectively. Plans were done<br />

with different configurations <strong>of</strong> activated lumens within the<br />

treatment sector, with lumens only in the outer ring (O), or only in<br />

the middle ring (M), or combination <strong>of</strong> outer and middle ring (OM).<br />

Planning goal was to minimize PTV(V150) and OAR(2cc) with D90 <strong>of</strong><br />

PTV > 90%. Doses to points A, B and C, which was located in the<br />

sparing structure at the surface, 0.5 cm and 1.0 cm depth <strong>of</strong> the Capri<br />

respectively, were calculated for all plans. The ratio <strong>of</strong> doses to those<br />

points from anisotropic plans to the reference plan was defined as<br />

effective transmission (ET).<br />

: The ET depends on the treatment sector length and the<br />

location <strong>of</strong> activated lumens. It varied from 0.2, 0.4 and 0.7 for 1/4,<br />

1/2 and 3/4 treatment sector, respectively. The dose to OAR strongly<br />

correlates to ET. They are 20%, 40% and 60% <strong>of</strong> the prescribed dose<br />

for 1/4, 1/2 and 3/4 treatment sector, respectively. PTV(V150),<br />

however, is inversely correlated to ET. PTV (V150) varied from close<br />

to 25%, higher than 15% and less than 15% for ¼, 1/2 and 3/4<br />

treatment sectors, respectively. With same treatment sector length,<br />

plans with OM lumens can reduce PTV (V150) by 5% but with increased<br />

OAR dose by 2% compared with plans with O loading. For OM loading,<br />

middle lumen could be weighted more heavily to reduce high dose to<br />

vagina mucosa without increasing too much dose to OAR. For 1/4<br />

treatment sector, plan with middle lumen only could reduce<br />

PTV(V150) in vaginal mucosa.<br />

: Postoperative endometrial brachytherapy using Capri<br />

applicator can optimize anisotropic dose distribution by using variable<br />

configuration <strong>of</strong> lumens. A combination <strong>of</strong> outer ring and middle ring<br />

planning model provides tolerable dose to mucosa <strong>of</strong> vagina, good<br />

coverage to vaginal treatment depth, and the best dose sparing at<br />

normal tissue.<br />

PO304<br />

EVALUATION OF 3D MRI CUBE TECHNIQUE FOR HDR CERVICAL CANCER<br />

TREATMENT<br />

H. Kim 1 , C. Houser 1 , S. Beriwal 1<br />

1<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology,<br />

Pittsburg PA, USA<br />

: Recently 3D image guided high dose rate (HDR)<br />

brachytherapy for cervical cancer treatment has been quickly evolved<br />

by using either CT or MRI images. Gold standard for the treatment<br />

planning is to use MRI images for each fraction <strong>of</strong> treatment due to<br />

the superior quality in accurate target delineation. However, MRI scan<br />

for HDR brachytherapy has not been popular because <strong>of</strong> the limitation<br />

<strong>of</strong> access to the scanner, the longer scan acquisition time than CT and<br />

longer planning time due to difficulty in reconstruction <strong>of</strong> applicators.<br />

Newly introduced 3D MRI CUBE sequence technique has been<br />

implemented to the MRI scanners and it <strong>of</strong>fers a 3D high definition and<br />

better resolution with a shorter total scan time. We compared total<br />

scan time, visualization and reconstruction <strong>of</strong> applicator in the<br />

treatment planning with MR CUBE technique to the planning with<br />

conventional MR images.<br />

: 20 cervical cancer patients who were treated<br />

with MRI based plan using HDR Ring and Tandem applicator were<br />

analyzed. All patients had 5 fractions after external beam was<br />

completed and each HDR fraction was replanned for treatment with<br />

Nucletron Plato 14.5 system. Ten patients had MRI scans using


S<strong>12</strong>2 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

conventional method <strong>of</strong> T2 true axial with 5.0mm slice spacing and<br />

the other <strong>10</strong> patients had scans with T2 CUBE by 2mm spacing and<br />

reformatted to 0.8mm spacing in true axial slices. Xray film based<br />

plans were taken as reference plans for reconstruction <strong>of</strong> applicators<br />

for each fraction for all patients. Total <strong>10</strong>0 fractions were analyzed.<br />

Reference plan was generated based on orthogonal Xray films by<br />

digitizing the dummy seed markers inside applicators and prescribing<br />

dose to point A. MRI based plan was generated by tracking the<br />

applicator shape using coordinates <strong>of</strong> applicator and dwell positions in<br />

a reference plan. Comparisons between reference plan and MR based<br />

plans were involved as following: i) overall conventional and cube MR<br />

scan time , ii) dwell time for weighting 1.0 and iii) geometrical source<br />

dwell position coordinate.<br />

: Total scan time was 30 minutes and 8 minutes for<br />

conventional and CUBE technique respectively. Dwell time variation<br />

was 1.9 to 8.1% with a SD <strong>of</strong> 3.6% and 0.1 to 3.0% with a SD <strong>of</strong> 0.9% for<br />

conventional MR and CUBE sequence respectively. Variations from the<br />

reference plan in applicator reconstruction showed 1.8 mm with a<br />

standard deviation (SD) <strong>of</strong> 0.8 mm and 1.1mm with a SD <strong>of</strong> 0.5 mm for<br />

ring and tandem applicator respectively in conventional MR image. In<br />

T2 CUBE image, variation was 0.7 mm with SD <strong>of</strong> 0.4 mm and 0.3 mm<br />

with SD <strong>of</strong> 0.2 mm for ring and tandem applicator respectively.<br />

: MRI CUBE scan provides shorter scan acquisition time,<br />

better accuracy <strong>of</strong> applicator reconstruction in the planning with high<br />

resolution. It can help utilizing MRI based planning for HDR cervical<br />

cancer treatment and will improve the quality <strong>of</strong> planning process.<br />

PO305<br />

3D BALANCED STEADYSTATE FREE PRECESSION (3DBSSFP) MRI<br />

INTERSTITIAL CATHETER IDENTIFICATION<br />

A. Viswanathan 1 , T. Kapur 2 , A. Damato 1 , E. Schmidt 2<br />

1<br />

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Boston, USA<br />

2<br />

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology, Boston,<br />

USA<br />

: To determine the utility <strong>of</strong> a 3DbSSFP Magnetic<br />

Resonance (MR) sequence to identify interstitial catheters after<br />

insertion used for gynecologic interstitial brachytherapy in an MR<br />

environment<br />

: A pressing problem in MRguided interstitial<br />

brachytherapy is difficulty with precisely locating the catheters during<br />

the insertion process. Therefore, we sought to identify an MR<br />

sequence which could be used to reproducibly identify each catheter<br />

after insertion. A series <strong>of</strong> 3 patients underwent MRguided catheter<br />

placement in a multimodality operating room with a 3 Tesla MR<br />

scanner used for intraoperative visualization <strong>of</strong> the tumor and<br />

interstitial catheters. In order to visualize and distinguish the<br />

catheters from each other, multiple contrast MR sequences (3DbSSFP,<br />

3DFSE, 3DGRE) were acquired. After the first catheter was inserted,<br />

a 3DbSSFP scan was performed in the sagittal plan, and an attempt<br />

made to identify the tip <strong>of</strong> the catheter. After a series <strong>of</strong><br />

modifications to reduce the size <strong>of</strong> the ballooning at the tip, an ideal<br />

sequence was developed. Subsequently, additional catheters were<br />

inserted and scanned using this sequence, and catheters were<br />

identified as unique entities using the images obtained. Needle<br />

positions were compared to CTbased identification <strong>of</strong> the needles.<br />

: A sequence using 3DbSSFP in a 3 Tesla MR scan was<br />

identified as the best sequence for catheter identifications with<br />

ballooning artifact at the tip. It was confirmed on CT and showed<br />

accurate placement (Figure). The needleartifact size, shaped as a<br />

cross centered on the needle, was controlled by changing the 3D<br />

bSSFP bandwidth and repetitiontime (TR). Best results were achieved<br />

with TR/TE/θ=4.6 ms/2.3 ms/30 0 , bandwidth= 600 Hz/pixel,<br />

0.9x0.9x1.6 mm 3 resolution, 160 mm superiorinferior coverage, 1.2<br />

minutes/acquisition. The most accurate identification was confirmed<br />

with this optimized 3DbSSFPP series, with the 3DGRE signaltonoise<br />

ratio being lower; an equivalentresolution 3DFSE required 5minute<br />

scans. Accurate identification <strong>of</strong> the catheter tip during the insertion<br />

process allows proper placement and ensures that catheters are not<br />

unintentionally inserted into the normal tissue structures.<br />

: A novel sequence for MR catheter identification is<br />

proposed and validated in a clinical series <strong>of</strong> patients undergoing<br />

interstitial catheter placement for gynecologic brachytherapy.<br />

PO306<br />

FROM 2D RADIOGRAPHBASED TO 3D CTBASED PLANNING IN CERVICAL<br />

CANCER BRACHYTHERAPY WARSAW EXPERIENCE<br />

M. Dabkowski 1 , M. Kawczynska 2 , A. ZolciakSiwinska 1 , E.<br />

Gruszczynska 2 , B. Czyzew 2<br />

1<br />

The Maria SklodowskaCurie Memorial Cancer Center, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Warsaw, Poland<br />

2<br />

The Maria SklodowskaCurie Memorial Cancer Center, Medical<br />

Physics Department, Warsaw, Poland<br />

: To investigate the differences in dose distribution<br />

between twodimensional radiographbased planning and three<br />

dimensional CTbased planning in cervical cancer brachytherapy.<br />

: We investigated 160 HDR brachytherapy plans<br />

from two groups <strong>of</strong> patients treated at our deparment for cervical<br />

cancer stages IBIIIB. The first group consisted <strong>of</strong> 20 consecutive<br />

patients treated with 2D HDR brachytherapy, with dose prescription to<br />

point A. In the second group <strong>of</strong> 20 successive patients a 3D CTbased<br />

approach was used with dose prescription to target volume. In both<br />

groups the ICRU Report 38 recommendations were used for reporting<br />

the dose distribution. For each patient we analyzed 4 plans (one plan<br />

for every fraction).<br />

: The analysis revealed moderate to significant differences<br />

between 2D and 3Dbased planning in terms <strong>of</strong> dose distribution. CT<br />

based treatment planning resulted in lower volumes <strong>of</strong> prescribed<br />

isodose, lower doses to points A, B, rectal and bladder points.<br />

: 3D CTbased brachytherapy planning with dose<br />

prescription to target volume results in significantly lower treatment<br />

volumes. Further clinical follow up is needed for evaluation <strong>of</strong> clinical<br />

relevance <strong>of</strong> new treatment planning method in terms <strong>of</strong> local control<br />

and acute and late toxicity.<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S <strong>12</strong>3<br />

PO307<br />

RESULTS OF CT BASED BRACHYTHERAPY PLANNING FOR IIBIVA<br />

CERVICAL CANCER PATIENTS<br />

M. Garipagaoglu 1 , E.T. Tezcanli 1 , M. Sengoz 1 , O. Senkesen 1 , H.<br />

Kucucuk 1 , E.O. Goksel 1 , M. Yilmaz 1 , I. Aslay 2<br />

1 Acibadem University Med, Radiation Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey<br />

2 Istanbul University, Oncology Institute, Istanbul, Turkey<br />

: To evaluate the treatment results and morbidity<br />

<strong>of</strong> stage IIBIVA cervical carcinoma patients treated with combination<br />

<strong>of</strong> external radiotherapy (ERT) and 3 dimensional (3D) high dose rate<br />

(HDR) brachytherapy (BT).<br />

: Thirtyseven cervical carcinoma patients with<br />

inoperable stage IIBIVA, tumor size ≥5cm, treated between July 2005<br />

December 20<strong>10</strong> were included. 3D conformal technique was used for<br />

pelvic ERT to total doses <strong>of</strong> 4550Gy, parametrial boost was added for<br />

selected cases. Paraaortic ERT performed using simultaneous<br />

integrated boost technique with macroscopic disease receiving 60 Gy<br />

was used for 8 patients. Median BT fraction dose was 6 Gy (58) Gy<br />

and fraction number was 5 (35). Concurrent 40mg/m 2 <strong>of</strong> weekly<br />

cisplatin was administered during ERT. BT was started at least after<br />

completion <strong>of</strong> 4 th week <strong>of</strong> ERT. Computerized tomography (CT) and<br />

magnetic resonance (MR) compatible applicators were used. CT<br />

images were taken after the placement <strong>of</strong> applicators and 3D<br />

brachytherapy planning (BTP) was performed. Beside CT images, MR<br />

images were obtained for selected patients. Targets such as residual<br />

GTV, high risk CTV (HRCTV) and intermediate risk CTV (IRCTV) and<br />

OARs namely rectum (R) and bladder (B) were delineated. 3D BTP,<br />

dose calculation and optimizations (manual and volume) were<br />

performed considering target and OAR doses. According to our in<br />

house protocol 90% <strong>of</strong> HRCTV were required to receive prescription<br />

dose (PD) and D2cc for B and R needed to be less than 80% <strong>of</strong> PD.<br />

Treatment was done using HDR Varisource 200 device containing Ir 192<br />

sources. Patients were followed up with 3 month intervals. The effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> stage, tumor size, ERT dose, BT fraction and total dose, residual<br />

tumor size after ERT, left and right point A doses, V<strong>10</strong>0 and D90 for<br />

GTV to local control and survival were studied. Moreover the relation<br />

<strong>of</strong> toxicity and dosevolume parameters such as ICRU38 R, percent and<br />

absolute R volume receiving PD and 80%<strong>of</strong> PD, rectal length receiving<br />

80%PD, D2cc, D1cc, D0.1 cc for rectum and mean rectal doses were<br />

investigated.<br />

: All patients completed the planned treatment receiving<br />

median 5 (46) times weekly cisplatin. Stage distribution was IIB: 21,<br />

IIIA: 2, IIIB: 7, IVA: 7 patients and median largest tumor diameter was<br />

5.6 (5 11) cm. After completion <strong>of</strong> ERT, measured median GTV<br />

volume was 3.9 (067) cc. Five year local control and survival for<br />

whole group and IIB were 87% 66.3% and 95% 90% respectively.<br />

Stage was the only significant factor for both local control and<br />

survival. No bladder toxicity was observed. However, chronic rectal<br />

toxicity was seen in 5 patients (Grade 3 in 2 patients, grade2 in 2<br />

patients and grade1 in 1 patient). No relation between dose volume<br />

parameters and rectal side effects was found.<br />

: Although, 3D BTP provided better local control and<br />

survival, the patients with large tumor size and advanced stage<br />

disease failed to show improvement in rectal toxicity.<br />

PO308<br />

HDR BRT IN ENDOMETRIAL CANCER: EXPERIENCE OF TWO<br />

FRACTIONATION SCHEDULES AND RESULTS OF 14 YEARS WITH 57<br />

PATIENTS<br />

S. Gribaudo 1 , M. Tessa 2 , E. Madon 3 , V. Richetto 3 , D. Masenga 4 , U.<br />

Monetti 1 , A. Mussano 1 , A. Urgesi 1 , D. Nassisi 2 , S. Cosma 5<br />

1<br />

O.I.R.M. S. Anna Hospital, Radiotherapy, Torino, Italy<br />

2<br />

Cardinal Massaia Hospital, Radiotherapy, Asti, Italy<br />

3<br />

O.I.R.M. S. Anna Hospital, Physics, Torino, Italy<br />

4<br />

Cardinal Massaia Hospital, Physics, Asti, Italy<br />

5<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Turin, Gynecology, Torino, Italy<br />

: Endometrial cancer is the mainly gynecologic<br />

malignancy that is, in 8085%, in stage I at the time <strong>of</strong> diagnosis. The<br />

standard primary treatment for early stage endometrial cancer<br />

remains TAH&BSO, with appropriate surgical staging. The<br />

epidemiology <strong>of</strong> this disease favours elderly, obese women with<br />

multiple medical problems (hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular<br />

diseases, coagulation disorders, respiratory disorders) that render<br />

some <strong>of</strong> them medically inoperable. Radiation alone is the only<br />

efficient option for these women. <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> is the main<br />

component <strong>of</strong> radiation management in this cohort <strong>of</strong> patients.<br />

: Staging was based on clinical examination,<br />

TVUS, MR or CT scan and fractionated curettage. From September<br />

1997, to July 2011, 57 patients were treated with BRT HDR alone. The<br />

median age was 79 years (range 5793). There were 19 patients in<br />

Stage Ia, 35 in Stage Ib, and 3 in Stage II. Overall, diseasespecific<br />

survival, local control and late side effects were analyzed<br />

retrospectively. Followup over <strong>10</strong> years (mean 52 months) is<br />

reported. BRT HDR was performed with Rotte endometrial 'Y'<br />

applicator and in stage II by adding an endovaginal cylinder<br />

applicator. Dose prescription: we use ‘‘uterine points’’ that are two<br />

points located 1 cm over the centre <strong>of</strong> a line drawn between the tips<br />

<strong>of</strong> the two ends <strong>of</strong> the Rotte applicator and a series <strong>of</strong> points placed<br />

laterally to the tandem according to the pretreatment imaging data.<br />

The entire length <strong>of</strong> the uterus was treated so as to ensure coverage<br />

<strong>of</strong> the fund. TPS optimization was performed to maintain the bladder<br />

and rectal maximum point doses below <strong>10</strong>0% <strong>of</strong> the prescribed dose;<br />

the same plan was used for each fraction <strong>of</strong> treatment. From 1997 to<br />

2002 BRT was performed four to five times (weekly) and mean dose<br />

was 29 Gy (range 1835 Gy); from 2003 (30 patients) we deliver 30 Gy<br />

in five fractions <strong>of</strong> 6 Gy each b.i.d. schedule, 6 hours interval<br />

between fractions.<br />

: At 5 years, overall survival, diseasespecific survival, and<br />

local control were 47.4%, 86%, and 89.5% (Stage Ia: 50%, 86.4%, and<br />

90.9%; Stage Ib: 46.9%, 87.5%, and 90.6%; and Stage II: 33.3%, 66.7%,<br />

and 66.7%). Disease specific survival was not affected by tumour<br />

grade or age. The local control rate is related to the size <strong>of</strong> the uterus<br />

but not to the tumour grading. One patient showed progressive<br />

disease, 6 (<strong>10</strong>,6%) developed recurrence after a median <strong>of</strong> 13 months<br />

(3 with distant metastases), 2 (3,5%) developed a lymph node<br />

recurrence with distant metastases. One patient have a GE grade III<br />

late side effect (1.8%) at 5 years, not related with rectal dose.<br />

: At Stages Ia, Ib, and II, HDR BRT with Rotte 'Y' applicator<br />

is a very effective treatment modality with good local control rates<br />

and suitable diseasespecific survival for patients who are not fit for<br />

surgery.This method has proven to have a low risk <strong>of</strong> acute<br />

complications and longterm side effects. Longer followup will be<br />

required to document the incidence <strong>of</strong> late effects using the b.i.d.<br />

fractionated HDR approach. In the short term, it seems that this<br />

approach is a feasible way to limit the number <strong>of</strong> procedural<br />

complications and length <strong>of</strong> hospital stay and bed rest.<br />

PO309<br />

DOSIMETRIC IMPACT OF INTERFRACTION CATHETER MOVEMENT IN MRI<br />

CT GUIDED HDR INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY FOR GYN CANCER<br />

F. Rey 1 , C. Chang 1 , C. Mesina 1 , N. Dixit 1 , K. Teo 1 , L. Lin 1<br />

1 University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, USA<br />

: To determine the dosimetric impact <strong>of</strong> catheter<br />

movement for MRI/CT image guided high dose rate (HDR) interstitial<br />

brachytherapy (ISBT) for gynecologic cancers and investigate feasible<br />

alternatives for optimal dose delivery.<br />

: Between January and September 2011, 8<br />

patients were treated with HDR ISBT using the SyedNeblett template.<br />

Disease sites included: cervical (4), vaginal (2), vulvar (1), and<br />

endometrial (1). All patients received EBRT (median 50.4 Gy). Needles<br />

were placed according to a preplan based on CTV assessment using<br />

MRI and CT. The Eclipse treatment planning system and the Varian<br />

GammaMedPlus ix were used for planning and delivery, respectively.<br />

The CTV and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk were contoured and the catheters were<br />

digitized using a postimplant MRI and CT. The prescribed dose was<br />

3.75 – 4 Gy per fraction for a total <strong>of</strong> 5 fractions delivered twice daily<br />

on 3 consecutive days with a single implantation. Planning goals were<br />

a dose homogeneity index ≥ 0.65 and CTV D90 ≥ 90%. The treatment<br />

plan for the first fraction was created and delivered on day 1 (d1). An<br />

MRI and CT were performed prior to the second and fourth fraction.<br />

All image sets were coregistered to the initial CT and MRI. The CTV <strong>of</strong><br />

the d1 MRI was transferred, OARs were drawn and catheters were<br />

digitized on the d2 and d3 CT. Three scenarios were modeled. 1) The<br />

d1 plan (same dwell positions/times) was applied to the d2 and d3 CT,<br />

using the updated catheter positions and compared to the d1 plan. 2)


S<strong>12</strong>4 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Based on the same optimization objectives <strong>of</strong> the d1 plan, replanning<br />

was performed with the actual catheter positions for d2 and d3.<br />

Dosimetry was analyzed for each plan and compared to the d1 dose<br />

distribution. 3) We further applied the dwell positions/times from the<br />

d2 replan over the d3 CT and compared the dosimetric goals with a d3<br />

CT replan.<br />

: 1) When we used the d1 plan on the d2 and d3 CT with the<br />

updated catheter positions, the mean CTV V<strong>10</strong>0 decreased from 83.7%<br />

to 80.1% (p=0.16) and 79.2% (p=0.03), respectively. The coverage <strong>of</strong><br />

the mean CTV D90 was reduced from 92.3% on d1 to 88.9% (p=0.19) on<br />

d2 and to 87.5% (p=0.009) on d3. 2) The replanning on d2 and d3<br />

compensated for catheter movement with no significant difference<br />

with the initial plan, mean CTV V<strong>10</strong>0 <strong>of</strong> 85% (p=0.25) and D90 <strong>of</strong> 94.2%<br />

(p=0.<strong>12</strong>) on d2 and V<strong>10</strong>0 <strong>of</strong> 84.5% (p=0.3) and D90 <strong>of</strong> 92.7% (p=0.76)<br />

on d3. 3) When we compared the replan <strong>of</strong> d2 applied on the d3 CT vs<br />

the d3 replan, there was no significant difference in coverage, V<strong>10</strong>0<br />

<strong>of</strong> 82% (p=0.22) and D90 <strong>of</strong> 89.7% (p=0.25).<br />

: Interfraction catheter movement significantly decreases<br />

the CTV coverage over 3 days, compromising CTV coverage for the<br />

fourth and fifth fractions. Rather than replanning on both days prior<br />

to treatment, replanning on the day 2 CT for day 3 treatment would<br />

give an optimal solution that would compensate for interfraction<br />

catheter displacement. This is a feasible and time effective technique<br />

using a single replanning.<br />

PO3<strong>10</strong><br />

CLINICAL FEASIBILITY OF COBALT 60 HDR INTRACAVITARY<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY IN CARCINOMA CERVIX : A PRELIMINARY REPORT<br />

A. Basu 1 , S. Basu 1 , K. Ghosh 1 , S.N. Mullick 1 , S. Datta 1<br />

1<br />

R.G. Kar Medical College Kolkata, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />

Oncology, Kolkata, India<br />

: 60 Co sources with identical dimensions to 192 Ir<br />

have recently been made available for use in HDR brachytherapy. We<br />

present one <strong>of</strong> the first clinical data <strong>of</strong> our initial single institutional<br />

experience with 60 Co HDR remote afterloading brachytherapy in<br />

gynaecological malignancies.<br />

: Patients <strong>of</strong> locally advanced carcinoma cervix<br />

were accrued for this single institutional prospective observational<br />

study to test the clinical feasibility and safety <strong>of</strong> using 60 Co HDR<br />

brachytherapy. All patients were more than 18 years <strong>of</strong> age and had<br />

biopsy proven squamous cell ca cervix (FIGO stage IIB – IVA). They had<br />

normal baseline hematological, biochemical and renal pr<strong>of</strong>ile and<br />

ECOG PS 0 or 1. They received upfront EBRT <strong>of</strong> 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions<br />

over 5.5 weeks to the pelvis using standard portals with weekly Inj.<br />

Cisplatin 40 mg/m 2 . All patients then received HDR intracavitary<br />

brachytherapy with the Multisource remote afterloading machine<br />

using 60 Co source and the HDR Plus s<strong>of</strong>tware v2.6 (Eckert & Ziegler<br />

BEBIG GmbH, Germany). All fractions were planned using CT imaging.<br />

Planning parameters mandated dose prescription to point A. Dose<br />

cut<strong>of</strong>fs <strong>of</strong> < 75 Gy EQD2 to 2cc volumes <strong>of</strong> rectum and sigmoid colon<br />

and < 90 Gy EQD2 to 2cc volume <strong>of</strong> bladder were aimed for and the<br />

D90 HRCTV and D90 IRCTV were planned to receive > 87 Gy and > 60<br />

Gy. Treatment was planned to be completed within 8 weeks. Initial<br />

response and toxicity were assessed.<br />

: From October 20<strong>10</strong> to December 2011, 167 patients <strong>of</strong><br />

carcinoma cervix were treated at our centre. The median age was 54<br />

years (range 28 – 76 yrs). Majority <strong>of</strong> the patients were in FIGO stage<br />

IIIB (63%). 93% <strong>of</strong> patients received chemoradiation and majority (84%)<br />

completed treatment on time. Most <strong>of</strong> the patients (88%) received 9<br />

Gy in 2 fractions to point A. CT based planning was done for all<br />

fractions and GTV B, HRCTV and IRCTV were delineated using clinical<br />

findings and / or T2w MR imaging. The median EQD2 for D90 HRCTV<br />

was 88 Gy (range 67.3 – <strong>12</strong>4.7 Gy) and D90 IRCTV was 65.5 Gy (range<br />

50 – 92.9 Gy). The median EQD2 for D2cc Rectum was 71.9 Gy (range<br />

54.3 – 85.2 Gy), D2cc Bladder was 80.75 Gy (range 54– <strong>10</strong>9.4 Gy) and<br />

D2cc Sig Col was 65.85 Gy (range 49.1 – 85.1 Gy). The acute toxicity<br />

was acceptable and no G3 or higher acute bladder or bowel toxicities<br />

were noted. Till January 15 th , 20<strong>12</strong>, there have been no locoregional<br />

failures and only 2 late rectal toxicities (bleeding), both <strong>of</strong> whom<br />

received D2cc rectal doses > 85 Gy EQD2.<br />

: HDR brachytherapy using 60 Co sources for carcinoma<br />

cervix is clinically feasible and safe with favourable short term<br />

response and toxicity, comparable to historical data using 192 Ir. This<br />

represents a viable option for HDR brachytherapy with added benefits<br />

<strong>of</strong> lower constraints on logistics, resources and perhaps cost because<br />

<strong>of</strong> the longer half life <strong>of</strong> 60 Co. However, larger studies with more<br />

number <strong>of</strong> patients and long term follow up are required in future.<br />

<br />

PO311<br />

HDRAFTERLOADING FOR BREAST IORT USING A BALLOON CATHETER<br />

APPLICATOR<br />

U. Schleicher 1 , E. Bosch 1 , W. Hürter 1 , L. Paas 2 , M. Türker 2<br />

1<br />

Strahlentherapie GP DürenMechernich, Strahlentherapie Düren,<br />

Düren, Germany<br />

2<br />

Krankenhaus Düren, Gynaecology, Düren, Germany<br />

: We developed an intraoperative treatment for<br />

breast cancer using an HDR brachytherapy unit with 192Iridium and a<br />

balloon catheter with a single therapy lumen.<br />

: From February to December 2011, we treated<br />

40 patients aged 36 to 85 (median 62) years by intraoperative HDR<br />

afterloading brachytherapy intended as a tumour bed boost.<br />

Preoperative indication for boost irradiation was G2 or G3<br />

differentiation in the biopsy specimen. Patients were eligible for the<br />

method with cT1 (n=31) or small cT2 (n=9) tumours, no<br />

multicentricity, and a skintumourdistance <strong>of</strong> > 1.5 cm. After tumour<br />

excision and balloon catheter implantation (filling volumes 3550 ml,<br />

median 35 ml) into the tumour bed, the wound is temporarily closed<br />

with close adaptation <strong>of</strong> tissue to the balloon, leaving only the<br />

connecting catheter outside, and covered with sterile transparent<br />

drape. Accompanied by breast surgeon and anaesthesiologist, the<br />

patient is transferred in anaesthesia to the brachytherapy unit, and<br />

treated with an applicator surface dose <strong>of</strong> 20 Gy using standard plans<br />

calculated for different applicator volumes. Skin dose close to the<br />

applicator is monitored by in vivo dosimetry. After treatment, the<br />

patient is brought back to the operation theatre, the applicator is<br />

removed and oncoplastic surgery finished. Percutaneous whole breast<br />

radiotherapy was started 33 to 63 (median 42) days after IORT in<br />

patients not receiving chemotherapy. In the case histology reveals<br />

indications for chemotherapy whole breast radiotherapy is done<br />

thereafter.<br />

: Prolongation <strong>of</strong> anaesthesia due to irradiation time and<br />

transport was 40 minutes in mean. Balloon volumes ranged from 3550<br />

ml, resulting in 8.89.5 Gy in 1cm depth. Measured skin dose ranged<br />

from 1.381 to 8.8 Gy. Acute and subacute side effects were mild to<br />

moderate and consisted mainly in erythema, oedema or induration <strong>of</strong><br />

the surgical site. Major haematoma leading to intervention or<br />

infection was not observed. Incidence <strong>of</strong> seroma was not higher than<br />

usual. Four patients withdrew their consent to percutaneous therapy<br />

after IORT and thus received no further treatment. During further<br />

followup, no difference in toxicity was seen compared to<br />

percutaneous 3Dplanned boost after whole breast radiotherapy.<br />

: This IORT method is easily feasible and does not lead to<br />

severe specific side effects. Being an IORT procedure, it avoids<br />

geographic miss <strong>of</strong> the tumour bed. In patients receiving<br />

chemotherapy, the IORT boost <strong>of</strong> 20 Gy may lead to better local<br />

control. The structural requirements (architecture, brachytherapy<br />

unit) given, it <strong>of</strong>fers the possibility <strong>of</strong> breast IORT for departments<br />

with small numbers <strong>of</strong> eligible patients on a pay per performance<br />

basis (only the patientdependent cost <strong>of</strong> the catheters).<br />

PO3<strong>12</strong><br />

OUTCOME OF TRIPLE NEGATIVE (TN) BREAST CARCINOMA AFTER<br />

BREAST CONSERVATION WITH RADIOTHERAPY<br />

U. Masood 1 , M. Bukhari 2 , A. Masood 1 , I. Haider 1 , T. Mehmood 1 , A.<br />

Muhammad 1 , M. Shah 1 , A. Rasheed 1<br />

1<br />

Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Lahore, Pakistan<br />

2<br />

Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Surgical Oncology, Lahore, Pakistan<br />

: Triplenegative (TN) breast cancer, by definition<br />

estrogenreceptor, progesteronereceptor and HER2 negative, does<br />

not have as many treatment options as other breast cancers. The<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S <strong>12</strong>5<br />

current study was performed to determine the relationship <strong>of</strong> breast<br />

conservation with radiotherapy in TN breast cancer.<br />

: Total <strong>10</strong>9 triple negative breast cancer<br />

women underwent breast conservation (WLE, lumpectomy,<br />

quadrentectomy) followed by radiation 60GY in 30 fraction<br />

(200cGy/day 5 days a week). Chemotherapy was given either in neo<br />

adjuvant or adjuvant setting in all patients<br />

: Median follow up after treatment was 36months.Median age<br />

<strong>of</strong> the patients was 43 years (2673). 90% patients were early stage<br />

and <strong>10</strong> % were locally advanced while 62% were node negative and<br />

38% were node positive. Locoregional recurrence was seen in only<br />

3.7% patients (total 3, chest wall 1) while Distant metastasis was seen<br />

in 22.9% patients. At 4.38 years Kaplan Meier estimated disease free<br />

survival was 54% and overall survival was 81%.<br />

: Patients with TN breast cancer are not at significantly<br />

increased risk for isolated LRR at 5years so remain appropriate<br />

candidates for breast conservation. There is increased risk <strong>of</strong> distant<br />

failure even in early stage disease associated with poor disease free<br />

survival .Targeted therapies are required in clinical trials to find new<br />

and better ways to treat it.<br />

PO313<br />

EVALUATION OF IN VIVO DOSIMETRY IN BREAST CANCER<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY USING MOSFET DETECTORS<br />

D. Nahajowski 1 , E. Byrski 1 , R. Kudzia 1 , D. Dybek 1 , A. Dziecichowicz 1 ,<br />

T. Dabrowski 1 , A. Kukielka 1<br />

1<br />

Centre <strong>of</strong> Oncology Institute MSC Kraków, Cancer Centre, Krakow,<br />

Poland<br />

To evaluate MOSFET detectorbased in vivo skin<br />

dose in breast cancer brachytherapy performed using the Breast<br />

Template Set TM (Nucletron) needle applicator technique.<br />

: In vivo measurements, using TN502 RDM<br />

(Best Medical System) MOSFET detectors were made for 81 female<br />

patients undergoing breast cancer brachytherapy by the Breast<br />

Template Set (NUCLETRON) needle applicator technique. Prior to<br />

patient exposure using the NUCLETRON MicroSelectron HDR system,<br />

the MOSFET detectors were positioned between the templates and<br />

breast skin at two locations, shown in Fig. 1: at the tipend template,<br />

and at the connectorend template, in both cases along the inner<br />

(transfer tube) sides <strong>of</strong> the templates. Calibration <strong>of</strong> the MOSFET<br />

detectors was performed in a breast fantom made <strong>of</strong> bolus gel,<br />

specially prepared to imitate the clinical conditions. Values <strong>of</strong><br />

absorbed dose measured by these detectors were compared with<br />

values calculated at the detector positions by the PLATO TPS<br />

(NUCLETRON).<br />

<br />

: The mean absolute difference between 81 pairs <strong>of</strong> measured<br />

and planned dose values were 2.1% ± 5.9% (1 SD), for the tip end<br />

location and 1.2% ± 6.0% (1 SD) for the connector end location. The<br />

observed differences between the MOSFETmeasured and TPSplanned<br />

dose values may be due to uncertainties in measuring the needle<br />

lengths, instability <strong>of</strong> MOSFET detectors, inaccuracies <strong>of</strong> detector<br />

calibration and inaccuracies in the TPS calculations <strong>of</strong> the planned<br />

dose at detector locations.<br />

: The described method <strong>of</strong> MOSFETbased in vivo<br />

dosimetry applied in breast brachytherapy, by providing an<br />

adequately accurate evaluation <strong>of</strong> dose delivered to the breast skin, is<br />

able to effectively assess the dose delivered to the target area.<br />

PO314<br />

PRESCRIPTION DOSE EVALUATION FOR APBI WITH NONINVASIVE<br />

BREAST BRACHYTHERAPY USING EQUIVALENT UNIFORM DOSE<br />

K.L. Leonard 1 , D.E. Wazer 2 , M.J. Rivard 1 , S. Sioshansi 3 , J.R. Hiatt 4 ,<br />

C.S. Melhus 1 , J.T. Hepel 4<br />

1<br />

Tufts Medical Center Tufts University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Radiation<br />

Oncology, Boston MA, USA<br />

2<br />

Tufts Medical Center Tufts University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine and Rhode<br />

Island Hospital Warren Alpert School <strong>of</strong> Medicine <strong>of</strong> Brown University,<br />

Radiation Oncology, Boston MA and Providence RI, USA<br />

3<br />

UMass Memorial Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Worcester MA,<br />

USA<br />

4<br />

Rhode Island Hospital Warren Alpert School <strong>of</strong> Medicine <strong>of</strong> Brown<br />

University, Radiation Oncology, Providence RI, USA<br />

: A Phase I/II APBI trial using a noninvasive breast<br />

brachytherapy device (NIBB) was initiated. Calculations <strong>of</strong> equivalent<br />

uniform dose (EUD) were performed to identify the appropriate NIBB<br />

dose.<br />

: APBI plans were developed for 24 patients: 5<br />

with 3Dconformal APBI (3DCRT), 5 with multilumen intracavitary<br />

balloons (MIBB), 4 with singlelumen intracavitary balloons using<br />

multiple dwell positions (SMIBB), 5 with singlelumen intracavitary<br />

balloons using a single dwell position (SSIBB), and 5 simulated in the<br />

prone position with compression paddles for both the craniocaudal<br />

(CC) and mediolateral (ML) orientations simulating NIBB treatment<br />

(Figure).<br />

PTV_eval was contoured for 3DCRT and IBB techniques per the NSABP<br />

B39 protocol. For NIBB, PTV_eval was contoured on both the CC and<br />

ML scans and comprised the tumor bed with a 1 cm margin limited by<br />

the chestwall and 5 mm from the skin surface. Prescription doses <strong>of</strong><br />

34 Gy and 38.5 Gy were delivered in <strong>10</strong> fractions for IBB and 3DCRT,<br />

respectively. Prescription doses ranging from 3438.5 Gy were<br />

considered for NIBB, with plans generated using firstgeneration round<br />

applicators in the CC and ML orientations. Dose for each axis<br />

contributed equally to total dose. This method does not model tissue<br />

deformation and composite dosimetry between axes, which may<br />

influence EUD calculations. All plans were generated in Pinnacle<br />

treatment planning systems. DVH data from all 3DCRT, MIBB, and<br />

NIBB plans were used to calculate the biologically effective EUD and<br />

corresponding EUD to the PTV_eval using the following equation: EUD<br />

= EUBED/[n(1 + EUD/α/β)]. EUD was calculated for SSIBB and SMIBB<br />

using the equation EUD = <strong>10</strong>{[v(40BEDtrue/α/β) – <strong>10</strong>]/(20/α/β)}. An α/β<br />

= <strong>10</strong> Gy or 4.6 Gy (as per the START trial) was assumed for breast<br />

tumor. For 3DCRT, generalized EUD (gEUD) was also calculated in<br />

Pinnacle with local control (a = 7.2) as the endpoint. EUDs for varying<br />

NIBB prescription doses were compared to EUDs for the other APBI<br />

techniques.


S<strong>12</strong>6 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

: Mean PTV_eval volume was largest for 3DCRT (454 cm 3 ) and<br />

was similar for NIBB and MIBB (86.8 and 87.2 cm 3 , respectively).<br />

Mean gEUD was similar to calculated EUD for 3DCRT plans (38.8 and<br />

38.4 Gy, respectively). For MIBB, calculated EUD ranged from 33.1 –<br />

40.3 Gy, reflecting differences in treatment plan geometry. Changing<br />

α/β from 4.6 to <strong>10</strong> increased EUD by 2% on average. The Table<br />

displays the mean EUD for each treatment modality.<br />

EUDα/β = <strong>10</strong> (std dev)<br />

3DCRT (38.5 Gy) 38.4 (0.9)<br />

M–IBB (34 Gy) 35.7 (3.0)<br />

SMIBB (34 Gy) 38.0 (0.3)<br />

SS–IB (34 Gy) 38.8 (0.9)<br />

NIBB (34 Gy) 34.1 (0.4)<br />

NIBB (35 Gy) 35.1 (0.4)<br />

NIBB (36 Gy) 35.9 (0.2)<br />

NIBB (37 Gy) 37.0 (0.4)<br />

NIBB (38.5 Gy) 38.5 (0.4)<br />

: For APBI, 3638 Gy prescribed to the <strong>10</strong>0% isodose line<br />

delivered with NIBB using firstgeneration round applicators is the<br />

uniform dose equivalent <strong>of</strong> 34 Gy in <strong>10</strong> fractions delivered with IBB<br />

techniques and <strong>of</strong> 38.5 Gy in <strong>10</strong> fractions delivered with 3DCRT.<br />

Alternatively, 34 Gy with NIBB can be prescribed to the 95% isodose<br />

line.<br />

PO315<br />

CAN WE IMPROVE THE DOSE DISTRIBUTION FOR SINGLE OR MULTI<br />

LUMEN INTERSTITIAL BREAST BALLOON USED FOR APBI?<br />

G. Bieleda 1 , G. Zwierzchowski 1 , A. Chichel 2 , M. Kanikowski 2 , M.<br />

Dymnicka 1 , J. Skowronek 1<br />

1 Great Poland Cancer Centre, Medical Physics, Poznan, Poland<br />

2 Great Poland Cancer Centre, <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Poznan, Poland<br />

: The aim <strong>of</strong> the study was to verify dose<br />

distribution parameters for Contura and artificially created single<br />

lumen balloon applicator application for the same patient using two<br />

optimisation algorithms: Inverse Planning Simulated Annealing (IPSA)<br />

and dose point optimisation with distance option.<br />

: Group <strong>of</strong> 24 patient with Contura multilumen<br />

balloon applied were investigated. Each had tenfraction treatment<br />

with prescribed dose <strong>of</strong> 3.4 Gy per fraction. For every patient 4<br />

treatment plans were prepared. First for fivelumen balloon optimized<br />

with IPSA algorithm, with optimization parameters adjusted for each<br />

case. Second for the same applicator optimized with dose point<br />

optimisation with distant option. Two other plans were prepared for<br />

singlelumen applicator, created by removing four peripheral lumens,<br />

optimized with both algorithms.<br />

: The highest D95 parameter was obtained for plans <strong>of</strong> Contura<br />

patients optimized with IPSA algorithm, mean value 99,32 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

prescribed dose, and it was significantly higher than Contura plans<br />

optimized with dose point algorithm (mean= 83,50%, p


S<strong>12</strong>8 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

:To report five years results with single dose (7 Gy)<br />

HDRBT boost for highrisk breast cancer patients treated with breast<br />

conserving therapy.<br />

: Between June 2005 and December 20<strong>10</strong>, 139<br />

breast cancer patients (pTis: 7,1%, pT1: 66,9%, pT2: 28,4%, pT3: 2,1%)<br />

received a single fraction HDRBT boost after breastconserving<br />

surgery and whole breast external beam radiation therapy (EBRT).<br />

Median age: 53,7 years (range: 2577). Pathologic features:<br />

intraductal carcinoma (6.5%), ductal carcinoma (79.9%), lobulillar<br />

carcinoma (5%), others histologies (8,6%). 33,8 % <strong>of</strong> patients with<br />

infiltrating carcinoma had axillary positive nodes. Mean tumor sized:<br />

16,4 mm. (range:170). Linfovascular invasion: 14.4%. Perineural<br />

invasion: 8.6%. 22.3% <strong>of</strong> patients had grade 3 tumors. After<br />

completion <strong>of</strong> EBRT (median dose 4550 Gy), the patients received a<br />

singlefraction HDRboost <strong>of</strong> 7 Gy, using the Nucletron<br />

(Microselectron) afterloading system. In all patients rigid needles<br />

were used, with a catheter spacing <strong>of</strong> 16 mm.<br />

: At a median followup <strong>of</strong> 54,59 months (range: 1887), 6<br />

patients (4,3 %) with a disease free survival <strong>of</strong> 95,7 %. The overall<br />

survival was 96,4 %. One patient had hematoma at the implant site 8<br />

hours after removal the needles, and required surgery and two<br />

patients had mild fat necrosis, controlled with local treatment,<br />

without needing surgery. There were no other adverse <strong>events</strong>.<br />

: Breast conservation radiation therapy utilizing<br />

interstitial HDRBT boost implant with a single fraction <strong>of</strong> 7 Gy, seems<br />

a safe and well tolerated therapy, have good control local, and have<br />

few late side effects.<br />

PO321<br />

DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON BETWEEN 2D DOSE POINT AND 3D CT BASED<br />

VOLUME OPTIMIZATION IN BREAST BOOST HDR BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

E. Gruszczynska 1 , M. Dabkowski 2 , M. Kawczynska 1 , B. Czyzew 1 , M.<br />

Bijok 1 , A. Kulik 2<br />

1<br />

The Maria SklodowskaCurie Memorial Cancer Center, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Medical Physics, Warsaw, Poland<br />

2<br />

The Maria SklodowskaCurie Memorial Cancer Center, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Warsaw, Poland<br />

: The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to evaluate differences<br />

between two optimization methods <strong>of</strong> HDR breast boost<br />

brachytherapy planning. In the first method the localization <strong>of</strong> tumor<br />

bed was based only on clinical judgement, with no imaging <strong>of</strong> breast<br />

implant. The dose was prescribed to reference points 5mm from<br />

interstitial needles using dose point optimization (DPO). The second<br />

method is based on CT imaging <strong>of</strong> tumor bed and volume optimization<br />

(VO). These methods are compared in terms <strong>of</strong> conformity and<br />

homogeneity parameters.<br />

: Ten patients treated with HDR boosting <strong>of</strong><br />

breast tumor bed were evaluated. For each patient two separate<br />

plans were prepared. The first plan was based on CT imaging: breast<br />

tumor bed, planning target volume (PTV) and skin were delineated<br />

and volume optimization was used.<br />

In the second plan no imaging was applied and the active length <strong>of</strong><br />

the implant was decided by clinician. The dose was optimized<br />

typically on points 5mm from interstitial needles. For comparing <strong>of</strong><br />

these planning methods the information from 2D planning on CT<br />

images were used for the 3D planning mode. Dosevolume histograms<br />

were calculated for all volumes <strong>of</strong> interest along with conformity and<br />

homogeneity parameters.<br />

: Both optimization methods yielded almost similar dose to the<br />

skin (mean D0.01cc 46 % DPO v. 49% VO). The treated volume<br />

encompassed by the reference isodose using VO was reduced (mean<br />

V<strong>10</strong>0 62cc with DPO vs 39cc with VO, p=0.031 ). Volume optimization<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered better conformity index than DPO (mean CI 17%, p=0.015).<br />

With DPO high dose volumes were for V150 ( mean 18cc with DPO vs<br />

21cc with VO) and V200 (mean 7cc with DPO vs <strong>12</strong>cc with VO). The<br />

mean conformation number CN was 0.23 for DPO vs 0.55 for VO,<br />

p=0.0156. The mean value for DNR for implant was bigger for VO<br />

about 0.23 (p=0.0156).<br />

: CTbased planning with volume optimization <strong>of</strong>fers more<br />

conformal dose distribution and lowers irradiated volumes at the<br />

expense <strong>of</strong> less homogeneous implants. Both methods are good<br />

enough for sparing skin from excessive doses.<br />

PO322<br />

ACCELERATED PARTIAL BREAST IRRADIATION WITH HYBRID<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY APPLICATORS: FAVORABLE OUTCOMES AT FOUR<br />

YEARS<br />

C. Yashar 1 , R.R. Kuske 2 , C.A. Mantz 3 , C.A. Quiet 2 , M.B. Snyder 2 , A.G.<br />

Sadeghi 2 , Y.J. Graves 1 , D. Scanderbeg 1<br />

1<br />

UCSD Moores Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, La Jolla CA, USA<br />

2<br />

Arizona Breast Cancer Specialists, Radiation Oncology, Phoenix AZ,<br />

USA<br />

3<br />

21st Century Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Ft Meyers FL, USA<br />

: Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using<br />

various intracavitary applicators has become increasingly popular.<br />

There are currently a number <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy applicators on the<br />

market for use in treating patients with APBI. However, there is a<br />

need for long term followup with these applicators. A multi<br />

institutional research group, The StrutBased <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> Research<br />

Group, has been formed to study the long term outcomes <strong>of</strong> those<br />

treated with APBI using strutbased applicators. At the time <strong>of</strong><br />

abstract deadline, we present data on 50 women treated at three<br />

institutions using strutbased applicators with median followup <strong>of</strong><br />

approximately 46 months.<br />

: A total <strong>of</strong> 50 patients were treated at 3<br />

institutions with accelerated partial breast irradiation using the hybrid<br />

(nonballoon based) breast brachytherapy device with conventional<br />

dose and fractionation (340 cGy x <strong>10</strong> fractions twice daily). All<br />

patients successfully completed treatment and had no serious adverse<br />

<strong>events</strong> during treatment. Patients were followed regularly and graded<br />

on disease status, cosmesis, hyperpigmentation, seroma, induration,<br />

erythema, fibrosis, telangiectasias, fat necrosis and breast symmetry<br />

based on the CTCAE v3.0 (common terminology critera for adverse<br />

<strong>events</strong>, version 3.0).<br />

: Overall, the strutbased applicator was tolerated well by the<br />

patients and the results are summarized in the chart below.<br />

: With nearly four years <strong>of</strong> median followup the strut<br />

based brachytherapy device appears to be a welltolerated, effective<br />

treatment with minimal acute and few adverse late toxicities,<br />

although followup remains fairly modest. With APBI likely an<br />

acceptable treatment for a proportion <strong>of</strong> women with early breast<br />

cancer, the strutbased device is a facile and versatile device in the<br />

armamentarium.<br />

PO323<br />

COSMETIC OUTCOME AFTER INTRAOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY FOR<br />

EARLY BREAST CANCER IN WOMEN OVER 50 YEARS<br />

N. Williams 1 , M. Keshtgar 1 , T. Corica 2 , C. Saunders 3 , M. Bulsara 4 , D.J.<br />

Joseph 2 , on behalf <strong>of</strong> the TARGIT Trialists' Group 1<br />

1<br />

University College London, Division <strong>of</strong> Surgery and Interventional<br />

Science, London, United Kingdom<br />

2<br />

Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Perth,<br />

Australia<br />

3<br />

Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Surgery, Perth,<br />

Australia<br />

4<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Notre Dame, Institute <strong>of</strong> Health and Rehabilitation<br />

Research, Fremantle, Australia<br />

: The randomised controlled TARGIT Trial was<br />

designed to determine noninferiority between the novel technique <strong>of</strong><br />

TARGIT [intraoperative radiotherapy with Intrabeam® (Carl Zeiss,<br />

Germany)] and conventional external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in<br />

women with early breast cancer. The main outcome objective is risk<br />

<strong>of</strong> local relapse within the treated breast. We report here data from a<br />

subprotocol assessing cosmesis in 114 women over 50 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />

participating in the TARGIT Trial from one centre (Perth, Australia).<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S <strong>12</strong>9<br />

: Frontal digital photographs from were<br />

assessed, blind to treatment, using specialist s<strong>of</strong>tware (BCCT.core<br />

2.0, INESC Porto, Portugal) which produces a composite score based<br />

on symmetry, colour and scar. Statistical analysis was by generalised<br />

estimating equations (GEE) on all <strong>of</strong> the data, and logistic regression<br />

analysis at year 1.<br />

: 114 patients have been assessed, median age at<br />

randomisation 62 years (IQR 56 to 68). Photographs were taken at<br />

baseline (before surgery) and one, two, three and four years after<br />

initial breast conserving surgery; none had subsequent breast surgery.<br />

The scores were dichotomised into Excellent and Good (EG), and Fair<br />

and Poor (FP). There was a nonsignificant 45% increase in the odds <strong>of</strong><br />

having an outcome <strong>of</strong> EG for patients in the TARGIT group relative to<br />

the EBRT group (OR=1.45, 95%CI 0.78 – 2.69, p=0.245) after adjusting<br />

for tumour size. The results were similar when adjusted for tumour<br />

grade and age <strong>of</strong> the patient. For year 1 only there was a statistically<br />

significant 2.35 fold increase in the odds <strong>of</strong> having an outcome <strong>of</strong> EG<br />

for patients in the TARGIT group relative to the EBRT group (OR=2.35,<br />

95%CI 1.02 – 5.45, p=0.047) after adjusting for age <strong>of</strong> the patient,<br />

tumour size and grade.<br />

: These results confirm a significantly better cosmetic<br />

outcome with TARGIT compared to EBRT in the first year after<br />

surgery.<br />

PO324<br />

CONTRAINDICATIONS TO BREAST INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY AFTER<br />

CONSERVATIVE SURGERY<br />

N. Stas 1<br />

1 Instituto Português de Oncologia, <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Porto, Portugal<br />

: All the patients included were operated at I.P.O.,<br />

Porto or at some <strong>of</strong> the northen refering hospitals, since we're the<br />

only one performing breast interstitial brachytherapy (IBT). As it<br />

refers to a great number <strong>of</strong> patients, and since they were operated<br />

differently before being addressed for IBT, contraindication criteria<br />

must be set in order to get the best benefit for the patients<br />

: During 20<strong>10</strong>, 347 out <strong>of</strong> 432 patients were<br />

treated with a IBT boost <strong>of</strong> the closed tumour bed, with pre and post<br />

operatory mammography, the last one always done at our institution.<br />

IBT boost was performed 1 3 weeks after the end <strong>of</strong> ERT. 649<br />

fractions were distributed as follows: 25 patients treated with PDR<br />

Selectron <strong>of</strong> Nuclétron with a 1520 Gy dose, 0,8 Gy/ hour; 3<strong>12</strong><br />

patients treated with HDR Selectron <strong>of</strong> Nuclétron with 2 x 5 Gy/<strong>12</strong>h.<br />

85 patients were excluded. 25 patients treated with partial IBT were<br />

also excluded, since they have specific contraindications.<br />

: Contraindications (CI): In 20<strong>10</strong>, 85 (19,08%) patients selected<br />

for brachytherapy were excluded. Most <strong>of</strong> these exclusions (3 and 4)<br />

are illustrated with breast photograph and mammography.<br />

1. CI related to the patient general condition<br />

Physical or mental condition occurring after surgery or chemotherapy<br />

2. CI related to the breast pathology<br />

Great extension <strong>of</strong> in situ DC/LC, around limited invasive carcinoma,<br />

multifocal carcinoma in other quadrant<br />

3. CI related to the surgery performed (picture and mammography)<br />

Most patients now desire surgery to be excellent according to<br />

oncological and aesthetical standards in the same operative time,<br />

regardless <strong>of</strong> age. More and more contralateral breast reductions,<br />

breast repositions, and peri nipple, arcuate, sub mammal, T reversed<br />

and almost invisible scars are seen, as well as prosthesis. These<br />

obstacles may be overcome by placing surgical clips in the tumour bed<br />

(f<strong>org</strong>otten in up to 50% <strong>of</strong> the cases) or by tri dimensional<br />

reconstruction on pre and post operative mammography. A number <strong>of</strong><br />

patients had a non complex surgery and a simple scar over the tumour<br />

site. Post operative infections, multipunctured seromas and mammal<br />

celulitis may occur weeks or months after surgery.<br />

4. CI related to the anatomy <strong>of</strong> the operated breast<br />

Lack <strong>of</strong> breast volume. Axilary, supra sternal, sub mammal, sub<br />

clavicular, supra costal locations. All locations where hypodermic<br />

needles and plastic tubes would disturb the patient during the IBT<br />

treatment.<br />

5. Associated different CI<br />

6. Patient refusal<br />

: Early stage breast carcinoma patients represented 13,8%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the patients treated by the Radiotherapy Dpt <strong>of</strong> the I.P.O. Porto, in<br />

20<strong>10</strong>. It was in the 3 and 4 CI groups that we had most difficulties,<br />

and in spite <strong>of</strong> the more frequent usage <strong>of</strong> surgical clips, this is still a<br />

most f<strong>org</strong>otten procedure, that forces us to use reconstruction<br />

imaging techniques like mammography and even MRI which are much<br />

more expensive. In 2011 we had a new Radiotherapy Dpt, new PDR<br />

and HDR Selectrons and new imaging techniques, so that we’ll be able<br />

to work more, always standing for our quality standards.<br />

PO325<br />

HIGHDOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY FOR EARLY BREAST CANCER:<br />

DOSIMETRIC DATA AND COSMETIC EFFECT<br />

M. Italiani 1 , M. Casale 1 , L. Chirico 1 , L. Draghini 1 , E. Buono 1 , M. Muti 1 ,<br />

L. Basagni 1 , E. Maranzano 1<br />

1 "S.Maria" Hospital, Radiotherapy, Terni, Italy<br />

: To evaluate the dosimetric parameters in a group<br />

<strong>of</strong> patients with lowrisk early breast cancer treated with HDRBRT on<br />

a prospective phase II trial and analyze the correlation with cosmetic<br />

oucome.<br />

: From <strong>May</strong> 2005 to January 20<strong>10</strong>, aseries <strong>of</strong> 74<br />

patients (pts), median age 66 years (range value 4285) with early<br />

breast cancer were treated with HDRBRT after conservative surgery.<br />

The implant was afterloaded with HDR Ir192 with a Nucletron remote<br />

unit and the interstitial implant are based about 23 layers <strong>of</strong> parallel<br />

catheters in trapezoidal symmetry. The treatment schedule was 4 Gy<br />

twice a day for a total dose <strong>of</strong> 32 Gy with a minimum interval <strong>of</strong> 6 h<br />

between the 2 daily fractions. No external beam radiotherapy was<br />

given. Clinical endpoints evaluated included: acute and late toxicity<br />

(according to RTOG/EORTC scoring criteria), infield and extrafield<br />

relapse, regional control, disease free survival, overall survival.<br />

Cosmetic outcome was evaluated at each followup visit and<br />

dichotomized as excellent and good/poor. Dosimetric parameters,<br />

calculated with PlatoNucletron treatment planning system, were<br />

volumes receiving definite relative isodose (V<strong>10</strong>0, V150, V200)<br />

homogeneity index (DHI) and skin dose.<br />

: During the followup 71 pts (96%) and 3 pts (4%) developed<br />

acute skin G1 and G2 toxicity, respectively. No patients had G34<br />

toxicity. Of the series, 45 (61%) had a G0 late toxicity, 25 (34%) G1,<br />

and 3 (4%) G2 toxicity. In no case grade G34 late toxicity was<br />

reported. No infield and/or extrafield relapse was registered after<br />

HDRBRT. Whereas, there were no local relapses, 4 patients<br />

developed distant (3 liver and 1 bone) metastases. At last followup,<br />

in 49 (66%) pts the cosmetic outcome was rated as excellent, in 17<br />

(34%) as good, only in 11 as poor. V<strong>10</strong>0 mean is 114.5cc. V<strong>10</strong>0 is<br />

always inferior than 30% <strong>of</strong> breast volume. DHI mean are 0.75. Skin<br />

dose significatevely conditionated cosmetic outcome which resulted<br />

excellent in 81% and 44% <strong>of</strong> pts receiving ≤55% and >55% <strong>of</strong><br />

prescripted dose, respectively (p=


S130 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

singledwell dose kernels that can later be used for optimization.<br />

bGPUMCD can also simulate previously optimized plans, taking in<br />

consideration all dwell positions and dwell times <strong>of</strong> the plan. To<br />

establish the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the platform, singlesource dosimetry for<br />

the microSelectron V2 source was compared to published reference<br />

data. Three clinical cases were also used: a prostate case, a breast<br />

case and a case with a shielded applicator. Timing and accuracy<br />

benchmarks were performed on these cases for singledwell dose<br />

calculations and multipledwell clinical dose distributions and<br />

compared to reference dose distributions computed with GEANT4 and<br />

using the same simulation parameters. Dosimetric values, voxels per<br />

voxels differences and 1%2mm gamma criteria were used to<br />

characterize the accuracy.<br />

: Singlesource dosimetry, compared to reference data for the<br />

microSelectron V2 source, was within 2% for the radial function and<br />

within 14% for the anisotropic function. By comparing D90 and V<strong>10</strong>0<br />

values <strong>of</strong> the clinical plans, bGPUMCD was within 1% or 2% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

reference distributions, depending on the case. The average <strong>of</strong> the<br />

absolute value <strong>of</strong> the difference for voxels within the target was near<br />

or below 2%. 90% <strong>of</strong> the target voxels passed the 1%2mm gamma<br />

criteria for all three cases. For timing experiments, the computation<br />

<strong>of</strong> a singledwell position dose distribution took between 0.25 and 0.5<br />

seconds for a 2% statistical uncertainty and the computation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

optimized plan, with multiple dwell positions, was approximately 2<br />

seconds for a 2% statistical uncertainty, as seen in the included data<br />

table.<br />

Prostate Breast Shielded applicator<br />

(s) (s) (s)<br />

Single dwell position 0.29 0.27 0.46<br />

Full plan recalculation 1.45 2.01 2.00<br />

: bGPUMCD has the potential to allow for fast and<br />

accurate Monte Carlo simulations in all phases <strong>of</strong> HDR brachytherapy<br />

treatment planning, including its use by inverse planning algorithms.<br />

PO327<br />

MIXED INTEGER PROGRAMMING FOR DOSE AND DOSEVOLUME BASED<br />

OPTIMIZATION IN PROSTATE HDRBRACHYTHERAPY<br />

B.L. Gorissen 1 , D. Den Hertog 1 , A.L. H<strong>of</strong>fmann 2<br />

1<br />

Tilburg University, Econometrics and Operations Research, Tilburg,<br />

The Netherlands<br />

2<br />

MAASTRO Clinic, Medical Physics, Maastricht, The Netherlands<br />

: Current inverse treatment planning methods that<br />

optimize both catheter positions and dwell times in prostate HDR<br />

brachytherapy use surrogate linear or quadratic objective functions<br />

that have no direct interpretation in terms <strong>of</strong> DVHcriteria, do not<br />

solve to optimality or have long solution times. The aim is to enhance<br />

existing methods to solve in clinically acceptable time and to<br />

formulate a new dosevolume based model that solves to optimality<br />

while satisfying preset DVHcriteria.<br />

: Existing dosebased linear programs (LP) with<br />

integer variables and quadratic programs (QP) have the advantage<br />

that a dwell time modulation restriction or total dwell time constraint<br />

can be added easily and solved using a state<strong>of</strong>theart MILP or MIQP<br />

solver. Modifications are implemented to decrease the solution times.<br />

For the quadratic model, an iterative procedure is proposed to allow<br />

the optimal target dose to be an interval, while retaining<br />

independence between the solution time and the number <strong>of</strong><br />

calculation points. The methods are evaluated on three clinical cases.<br />

: For existing dosebased models to be solved to optimality,<br />

our modifications allow to optimize over more than 40 candidate<br />

catheter positions. An average speedup <strong>of</strong> 75% can be obtained by<br />

stopping the solver at an early stage, without deterioration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

clinical plan quality. For a fixed catheter configuration, dosebased LP<br />

solves the dwell time optimization problem to optimality in less than<br />

15 seconds, which confirms earlier results obtained by others. The<br />

iterative procedure for QP is comparable in speed, but produces<br />

better plans than the noniterative QP. Our dosevolume based model<br />

optimizes both catheter positions and dwell times in 5 minutes (range:<br />

0.315 minutes), gives better DVH statistics than dosebased models<br />

and requires less a posteriori dwelltime adaptation by a human<br />

expert. The solutions have a relatively large surrogate objective<br />

value, suggesting that the correlation between objective value and<br />

clinical plan quality is weak in existing dosebased models.<br />

: Our modifications decrease the solution time <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

dosebased models for inverse treatment planning <strong>of</strong> both catheter<br />

positions and dwell times. Extending the quadratic model to include<br />

an iterative procedure to find the optimal target dose improves the<br />

plan quality. The new dosevolume based model allows simultaneous<br />

optimization <strong>of</strong> both catheter positions and dwell times in clinically<br />

acceptable time and produces treatment plans that better match pre<br />

set DVHcriteria than existing dosebased models.<br />

PO328<br />

NEW DESIGN OF THE VALENCIA APPLICATORS TO REDUCE RADIATION<br />

LEAKAGE<br />

D. Granero 1 , J. PerezCalatayud 2 , F. Ballester 3 , Z. Ouhib 4 , J. Vijande 3 ,<br />

J. Richart 5<br />

1<br />

ERESA Hospital General Universitario, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />

Physics, Valencia, Spain<br />

2<br />

Hospital La Fe, Physics Section. Radiotherapy Department, Valencia,<br />

Spain<br />

3<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Valencia, Department <strong>of</strong> Atomic Molecular and Nuclear<br />

Physics, Burjassot, Spain<br />

4<br />

Lynn Cancer Institute <strong>of</strong> Boca Raton Regional Hospital, Radiotherapy<br />

Department, Boca Raton, USA<br />

5<br />

Hospital Clinica Benidorm, Radiotherapy Department, Benidorm,<br />

Spain<br />

: The Valencia applicators are designed to treat<br />

skin lesions with the microSelectronHDR afterloader. Although the<br />

radiation is highly directed to the treatment area, radiation might<br />

leak through the backside <strong>of</strong> the applicator. Recently, the<br />

manufacturer has introduced a new applicator design to reduce such<br />

radiation leakage. This new design consists mainly in the addition <strong>of</strong><br />

about 4 mm <strong>of</strong> tungsten in the backside <strong>of</strong> the applicator making it<br />

thicker. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is to evaluate by means <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Monte Carlo method the radiation leakage <strong>of</strong> this new design and to<br />

evaluate whether this modification affects the dose rate distributions<br />

in the treatment area.<br />

: The complete geometry <strong>of</strong> the new<br />

applicators has been introduced in the Monte Carlo code GEANT4. The<br />

applicators have been located on the surface <strong>of</strong> a cylindrical water<br />

phantom following a methodology similar to the used in the original<br />

study <strong>of</strong> the Valencia applicators by Granero et al [Med.Phys 2008<br />

35:495503]. Kerma in the water phantom and kerma in air outside<br />

the phantom have been evaluated to estimate the radiation leakage<br />

<strong>of</strong> the new designed Valencia applicators.<br />

: The Monte Carlo simulations <strong>of</strong> the new applicators show that<br />

the radiation leakage has been reduced significantly from the previous<br />

design. The largest radiation leakage <strong>of</strong> this design is now about 30%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the dose at the prescription point and about <strong>10</strong>% at 1 cm from the<br />

backside <strong>of</strong> the applicators. The dose rate distributions in the area <strong>of</strong><br />

treatment have not changed.<br />

: In this study the radiation leakage <strong>of</strong> the new design <strong>of</strong><br />

the Valencia applicators has been obtained. The radiation leakages<br />

have been largely reduced from the previous design without<br />

compromising dose rate distributions in the treatment area.<br />

PO329<br />

DOSIMETRIC ANALYSIS OF A THERMOBRACHYTHERAPY APPLICATOR IN<br />

THE CONTEXT OF A POSITIONING REPRODUCIBILITY STUDY<br />

J. Sánchez Mazón 1 , K. Arunachalam 2 , R. McMahon 3 , B. Steffey 3 , P.<br />

Stauffer 3 , J. Chino 3 , O. Craciunescu 3<br />

1<br />

Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Oncología<br />

Radioterápica, Santander, Spain<br />

2<br />

Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, Engineering Design, Madras, India<br />

3<br />

Duke University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Durham, USA<br />

: A thermobrachytherapy surface applicator (TBSA)<br />

has been developed for simultaneous heat and brachytherapy<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> chestwall (CW) recurrent breast cancer. The purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

this project is to assess variation in radiation dose due to movement<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 131<br />

<strong>of</strong> the TBSA relative to the target volume, as recorded during a<br />

volunteer protocol investigating TBSA comfort and secure fit.<br />

: The TBSA combines an 2cm spaced array <strong>of</strong><br />

brachytherapy catheters with a printed circuit board microwave<br />

antenna array coupled to the skin surface with a temperature<br />

controlled conformal 8 mm thick water bolus. Breath hold MRI scans<br />

<strong>of</strong> postmastectomy volunteers with the TBSA wrapped around the CW<br />

were acquired every 15 min for 90 min, a period during which the<br />

volunteers changed position several times. A planning target volume<br />

(PTV) representing a 5 mm skin strip was generated on each scan. An<br />

HDR plan to deliver 400cGy to the PTV using catheters spaced 2 cm<br />

apart was created on the Baseline scan <strong>of</strong> each volunteer using the<br />

volume optimization in BrachyVision 8.<strong>10</strong>. The plan was then<br />

reproduced on each subsequent scan. The following metrics were<br />

calculated for each plan: the coverage index V(x), with x = <strong>10</strong>0, 130,<br />

140, homogeneity index HI(x) = V(<strong>10</strong>0)V(x) for x = 130, 140, spill ratio<br />

SR = (Volume <strong>of</strong> normal tissue receiving <strong>10</strong>0% dose or more)/(Total<br />

volume receiving <strong>10</strong>0% dose or more), skin overdose OD = <strong>10</strong>0%(Dskin<br />

Dtarget)/Dtarget (with Dskin and Dtarget the dose at skin and 5 mm depth),<br />

and ipsilateral (i) and contralateral (c) mean lung dose MLD. For one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the patients, an electron plan was also generated in Eclipse for<br />

comparison, using two 20x20 cones, mixed 9 and <strong>12</strong> MeV, 1 cm bolus,<br />

and calculated with the Electron Monte Carlo algorithm (v. <strong>10</strong>.0.28).<br />

: Three volunteers were fitted with a rectangular (500 cm 2 )<br />

TBSA and two with a Lshaped (875 cm 2 ) TBSA. The mean PTV volume<br />

was 118.1 ± 0.1 cm 3 . The mean baseline ± STDEV <strong>of</strong> each metric is<br />

reported followed in parantheis by the maximum % variation between<br />

baseline and the 90 min scan: V(<strong>10</strong>0) =96.2% ± 0.9 (4.3%), HI(130) =<br />

91.8% ± 5.2 (6.4%), HI(140) = 94.6% ± 2.1 (5.1%), SR = 18.8 %± 5.4<br />

(15.6%), skin OD = 13.8 %± 1.5 (1.8%), MLDi = 1.064 Gy ± 0.2 (1.2%),<br />

and MLDc = 0.34 Gy ± 0.05 (3.4%). In contrast, the electron plan was<br />

inferior in target coverage, V(<strong>10</strong>0) = 86.1%, had lower HIs, HI(130) =<br />

80.4%, HI(140) = 83.1%, and larger spill ratio <strong>of</strong> 37%. Lung doses were<br />

lower, MLDi = 0.6 Gy and MLDc = 0.04 Gy, but might become<br />

comparable if a comparable V<strong>10</strong>0 was targeted.<br />

: The dosimetric impact <strong>of</strong> applicator displacements<br />

relative to the skin and target volume measured in this study are<br />

small, and changes in dosimetry due to these displacements are not<br />

clinically significant. The advantages <strong>of</strong> using this applicator for<br />

extensive CW disease include the potential for enhanced effect from<br />

simultaneous heat and radiation, and superior dose metrics compared<br />

to electron therapy.<br />

PO330<br />

INTEREST OF THE MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS FOR DOSIMETRIC<br />

EVALUATION OF THE 50 KVP DEVICE "PAPILLON50"<br />

O. Croce 1 , S. Hachem 1 , E. Franchisseur 2 , J.P. Gérard 3 , S. Marcié 3<br />

1<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Nice SophiaAntipolis, Radiotherapy Lab., Nice, France<br />

2<br />

Dosis<strong>of</strong>t, Radiotherapy, Cachan, France<br />

3<br />

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Radiotherapy, Nice, France<br />

: We presents a dosimetric study concerning the<br />

system named 'Papillon 50' used in the department <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy <strong>of</strong><br />

the Centre AntoineLacassagne, Nice, France. The machine provides a<br />

50 kVp Xray beam, currently used to treat the cancers <strong>of</strong> skin, eyelid<br />

or rectum. The system can be mounted with various applicators <strong>of</strong><br />

different diameters or shapes. These applicators can be fixed over the<br />

main rod tube <strong>of</strong> the unit in order to deliver the prescribed dose into<br />

the tumour with an optimal dose distribution.<br />

: We have analyzed depth dose curves and<br />

dose pr<strong>of</strong>iles for the naked tube and for a set <strong>of</strong> three applicators<br />

with SSD <strong>of</strong> 28.7mm, 32.3mm and 38.3mm. Dose measurements were<br />

made with an ionization chamber (PTW type 23342) and Gafchromic<br />

films (EBT2). We have also compared the measurements with Monte<br />

Carlo simulations (code PENELOPE) which have been used with a<br />

detailed geometrical description <strong>of</strong> the experimental setup.<br />

: The depths <strong>of</strong> the 50% isodose in water for the various<br />

applicators are respectively 6.0, 6.6 and 7.1 mm. Results showed a<br />

good agreement between simulations and physical measurements.<br />

Simulations are able to provide an accurate evaluation <strong>of</strong> the dose<br />

delivered. The following figure illustrates the close correlation<br />

between the measurements performed with a PTW ion chamber and<br />

the data from Monte Carlo PENELOPE simulations for depth dose curve<br />

using a 3 cm straight end applicator.<br />

Moreover, we design a specific s<strong>of</strong>tware named 'MC2Plan' that uses a<br />

precalculated dose distribution data from Monte Carlo simulations.<br />

MC2Plan can be useful to display isodoses when combining contact X<br />

rays radiotherapy and external beam radiotherapy in order to help<br />

radiation oncologists to optimize treatments.<br />

: The Monte Carlo PENELOPE simulations are in<br />

accordance with the measurements for a 50 kV Xray system.<br />

Simulations are able to confirm the measurements provided by<br />

Gafchromic films or ionization chambers. Results also demonstrate<br />

that Monte Carlo simulations could be helpful to validate the future<br />

applicators designed for other applications such as intraoperative<br />

radiotherapy (IORT) for breast cancer. Furthermore, Monte Carlo<br />

simulations could be a reliable alternative for a rapid evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

the dose delivered by such a system that uses multiple designs <strong>of</strong><br />

applicators.<br />

PO331<br />

SIMPLE PHANTOM SETUP FOR ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE HDR<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE<br />

T. Ribeiro Nuno Ramos 1 , M.E.R. Poli 1<br />

1 Hospital Santa Maria, Medical Physics Unit, Lisbon, Portugal<br />

: To develop a simple and low cost phantom setup<br />

to be used in a quality assurance procedure for ultrasound guided<br />

prostate high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy that encompasses the<br />

tests <strong>of</strong> the AAPM TG <strong>12</strong>8 report, geometry tests based on IAEA TRS<br />

430 and additional image fusion and dose verification tests.<br />

: The materials used were: a table tennis ball,<br />

three Nucletron's 6F needles for prostate implant, a Siemens<br />

ultrasound equipment, a Nucletron's HDR prostate brachytherapy<br />

system and a MOSFET dosimeter. The tennis table ball was selected<br />

for this setup because it is an object <strong>of</strong> known dimensions, good<br />

image contrast, low cost and easy to get. The phantom setup consists<br />

<strong>of</strong> inserting the three needles through the template and the table<br />

tennis ball in a triangular shape. The phantom and the transrectal<br />

ultrasound probe are then fixed to the stepper and inserted into a<br />

small water tank (Figure 1). The first set <strong>of</strong> image tests, based on<br />

AAPM TG <strong>12</strong>8 report, were (1) grayscale visibility, (2) depth <strong>of</strong><br />

penetration, (3) axial and lateral resolution, (4) axial and lateral<br />

distance measurement accuracy, (5) area measurement accuracy, (6)<br />

volume measurement accuracy, (7) needle template/ electronic grid<br />

alignment, (8) treatment planning system (TPS). A new image test was<br />

developed to evaluate the TPS image fusion (9). CT and MR images <strong>of</strong><br />

the phantom were made to allow volume measurements in both image<br />

sets and manual fusion tests with the ultrasound based images.<br />

Geometrical tests, based on IAEA TRS 430, for (<strong>10</strong>) needle<br />

reconstruction accuracy and (11) source position accuracy were also<br />

made. Finally, a dose verification test (<strong>12</strong>) was performed inserting a<br />

MOSFET dosimeter, through a catheter previously placed in the<br />

phantom parallel to the needles.


S132 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Figure 1 – Phantom setup.<br />

: Table 1 presents a summary <strong>of</strong> the results. The AAPM TG <strong>12</strong>8<br />

required tests (1 to 8) were accomplished with the setup used and the<br />

results were within the action limits. In test 6, the table tennis ball<br />

volume calculated by the ultrasound system was 2% higher than the<br />

actual volume. CT and MR images volume measurements, test 9, were<br />

about 1% lower than actual value. The fusion tests also showed a good<br />

matching between the images. The geometrical tests (<strong>10</strong> and 11) were<br />

also accomplished and the results were less than 1 mm.<br />

The final dose verification test (<strong>12</strong>) result, comparing TPS and<br />

measured values, was less than 2%.<br />

Table 1 – Results <strong>of</strong> the tests.<br />

: The phantom setup and methodology presented in this<br />

study allows the completion <strong>of</strong> AAPM TG <strong>12</strong>8 required tests as well as<br />

other tests recommended either by IAEA TRS 430 and the authors.<br />

A final note is that this setup only uses a table tennis ball and<br />

material that normally exists in a department with ultrasound guided<br />

prostate brachytherapy.<br />

PO332<br />

IS HDR EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE SUITABLE FOR MODERN<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY? POSITIONAL ERRORS, DOSIMETRIC IMPACT & CASE<br />

STUDY<br />

A. Palmer 1 , O. Hayman 2 , L. Ioannou 2 , Y.S. Nagar 3<br />

1<br />

Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust (& University <strong>of</strong> Surrey Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />

Engineering and Physical Science), Radiotherapy Physics, Portsmouth,<br />

United Kingdom<br />

2<br />

Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Radiotherapy Physics, Portsmouth,<br />

United Kingdom<br />

3<br />

Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Clinical Oncology, Portsmouth,<br />

United Kingdom<br />

: To study the effect <strong>of</strong> simulated HDR source<br />

dwell position errors on the dose to the clinical target volume (HR<br />

CTV) and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk in cervix cancer. Determine the clinically<br />

relevant positional accuracy requirement; inform QC needs and<br />

treatment uncertainty estimates. Interpret the performance <strong>of</strong> an<br />

HDR unit using this data.<br />

: Simulated dwell position errors, 0.2 to <strong>10</strong>.0<br />

mm, were introduced in eight HDR cervix plans and the dosimetric<br />

effect on ICRU and GECESTRO DVH parameters calculated. CT plans<br />

on the Eckert & Ziegler BEBIG (EZ) HDRplus planning system, with Co<br />

60 source and IUT/splitring applicator were used throughout. Two<br />

error modes were simulated: (a) systematic proximal shift (away from<br />

HDR unit) position calibration error; (b) source cable takeup lag,<br />

possible with older EZ s<strong>of</strong>tware, first dwell unaffected and others<br />

shifted distally [1].<br />

Video source position tests for the EZ HDR MultiSource were used with<br />

the above simulation data to predict effect on clinical dose delivery.<br />

: Figure 1 shows the relationship between systematic errors in<br />

source dwell positions, mode (a), and the % change in DVH metrics,<br />

D90 and D2cc. The mean and interquartile range from eight plans is<br />

provided. There is an approximate linear relationship; errors <strong>of</strong> 1.0<br />

mm result in 2.0 % change, 4.0 mm error <strong>10</strong>.0 % change. ICRU A pt.<br />

exhibits less change than DVH metrics, 0.4% and 0.7% respectively.<br />

Bladder doses increase while rectum, sigmoid and HRCTV decrease<br />

due to the proximal shift direction <strong>of</strong> dwells. This would be reversed<br />

for distal shifts. Table 1 gives additional detailed DVH data for 0.2 to<br />

2.0 mm position errors for both modes. Previous s<strong>of</strong>tware version <strong>of</strong><br />

the EZ unit had the potential for small dwell position errors due to<br />

curvature <strong>of</strong> the transfer tube: This effect on dose delivery<br />

uncertainty is given in Table 1(b). This is eliminated with new<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />

Thirty QC test results <strong>of</strong> source position were collated for the EZ HDR<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 133<br />

unit. 13% were recorded within 0.25 mm error, 64% within 0.5 mm,<br />

and 23% within 1.0 mm.<br />

Figure 1. Effect <strong>of</strong> systematic proximal dwell position shifts, 0.2 to 6.0<br />

mm, mode (a), on DVH metrics. Data is the mean and interquartile<br />

range from eight cervix plans.<br />

Table 1. Effect <strong>of</strong> dwell position shifts on dose delivery metrics, 0.2 to<br />

2.0 mm; modes (a) and (b), see text.<br />

: An accuracy <strong>of</strong> at least 1.0 mm in dwell positions is<br />

required to limit the effect on clinically relevant dose delivery<br />

parameters to within an acceptable level <strong>of</strong> 3.0%. Only at 0.2 mm<br />

accuracy are the effects all within 1.0%. A QC action level <strong>of</strong> 0.5 mm<br />

is proposed, with 1.0 mm maximum tolerance. All recorded QC<br />

position results for the EZ unit were within the clinically relevant<br />

accuracy level. Errors due to source cable takeup lag, with potential<br />

DVH uncertainty up to 6%, have been eliminated with the new<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />

[1] Palmer A et al. Performance assessment <strong>of</strong> the BEBIG multisource high dose rate brachytherapy treatment<br />

unit. Phys Med Biol 2009:54;74177434<br />

PO333<br />

PARTICULARITIES OF I<strong>12</strong>5 SEED CALIBRATION FOR PROSTATE<br />

INTERSTITIAL PERMANENT BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

A. TorneroLópez 1 , F. Simancas 1 , S. RuizArrebola 1 , M. GazdicSantic 2 ,<br />

D. Guirado 1<br />

1 Universitary Hospital San Cecilio, Radiophysics, Granada, Spain<br />

2 Clinical Centre <strong>of</strong> Sarajevo University, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical<br />

Physics and Radiation Safety, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina<br />

: For the measuring <strong>of</strong> I<strong>12</strong>5 seeds, we have<br />

available the plane parallel chamber SourceCheck (PTW), calibrated<br />

by PTW Laboratory Calibration Center, and the well chamber HDR<strong>10</strong>00<br />

(Standard Imaging), calibrated by the Wisconsin University. These<br />

chambers show a discrepancy <strong>of</strong> 6% between its simultaneous<br />

measurements <strong>of</strong> the same I<strong>12</strong>5 seed. We also found a difference <strong>of</strong><br />

about 3% <strong>of</strong> each chamber measurement from the value provided by<br />

the manufacturer for that particular seed. It is essential to find out<br />

the cause <strong>of</strong> these differences to guarantee the AAPM 1 and ESTRO 2<br />

recommendations for the QA procedure in brachytherapy (figure 1).<br />

Motivated by this scenario, we aim to establish a user protocol<br />

yielding to a fulfillment <strong>of</strong> the recommendations.<br />

: After doing an optimal statistical monitoring<br />

<strong>of</strong> both chambers, we have carried out several lines <strong>of</strong> work:<br />

1. The well chamber lecture is corrected by an additional pressure<br />

dependent factor 3 . As other hospitals, ours is located at a quite high<br />

altitude above the sea level. This fact compels us to apply correction<br />

factors as big as 3.03.5%, besides the usual tp correction. We<br />

performed an experiment to verify that this correction yields to<br />

coherent results. We took measurements at different altitudes,<br />

spanning pressures from 596 up to 770 mmHg.<br />

2. To have a set <strong>of</strong> consistent calibrated chambers, we opted for<br />

calibrating them all in our hospital using a calibration source provided<br />

by an ADCL. This possibility is included in the AAPM protocol for<br />

braquitherapy 4 .<br />

A monitoring procedure has been developed to control the deviation<br />

between the user measured distribution and the manufacturer one:<br />

periodic measurement <strong>of</strong> a sample <strong>of</strong> at least <strong>10</strong> seeds combined with<br />

the sporadic measurement <strong>of</strong> an individual seed calibrated by the<br />

manufacturer.<br />

: We confirm that the pressuredependent correction factor is<br />

correctly applicable to our well chamber. However, we find out that<br />

instead <strong>of</strong> applying a potential function correction, a simpler linear<br />

one yields to equivalent results.<br />

We measured the Air Kerma Strength (AKS) distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> sets <strong>of</strong> a<br />

mean <strong>of</strong> 20 seeds. We observed a systematic deviation <strong>of</strong> 2.5% from<br />

the manufacturing distribution. A similar difference is found with<br />

respect to the value <strong>of</strong> an individual calibrated seed.<br />

: The differences found in the measurements <strong>of</strong> the well<br />

chamber HDR<strong>10</strong>00, the SourceCheck and the manufacturer equipment<br />

are presumably due to discrepancies between their calibrations.<br />

We remark the need <strong>of</strong> a consistent cross calibration <strong>of</strong> the user’s<br />

available ionometric setups.<br />

We also suggest the realization <strong>of</strong> a statistical monitoring <strong>of</strong> the<br />

systematic difference between the manufacturing and user<br />

distributions <strong>of</strong> the AKS.<br />

1. Butler et al. Med Phys 2008;35:38605.<br />

2. Venselaar JLM, PérezCalatayud J. ESTRO Booklet No 8.<br />

ESTRO;2004.<br />

3. Griffin et al. Med Phys 2005;32: 1<strong>10</strong>3114<br />

4. Rivard et al. Med Phys 2004;31:63374.<br />

PO334<br />

DOSIMETRIC CONSEQUENCES OF ROTATIONAL ERRORS WITH DIRECT<br />

SIMULATION FOR PARTIAL BREAST IRRADIATION USING CONTURAÔ<br />

J. Peng 1 , M. Ashenafi 1 , K. Vanek 1 , J. Harper 1 , J. Jenrette 1<br />

1<br />

Medical University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina, Radiation Oncology,<br />

Charleston, USA<br />

: The purpose was to determine dosedelivery<br />

errors resulting from systematic rotational positioning errors <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Contura multilumen balloon catheter for Accelerated Partial Breast<br />

Irradiation (APBI) using direct simulation in the 3D imaging<br />

registration system (VelocityAl).<br />

: Twenty patients who received APBI had dose<br />

distributions reevaluated to assess the impact <strong>of</strong> systematic<br />

rotational positioning errors. The dosimetric effect <strong>of</strong> rotational


S134 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

errors was simulated by rotating 3D dose cloud manually using the 3D<br />

imaging registration system (VelocityAI), as shown in figure. The<br />

rotational errors <strong>of</strong> ± 1°, ± 3°, ± 5°, ± 7° , ± <strong>10</strong>° , ± 30°,± 45° and ±<br />

90 ° along each axis were simulated. Dosimetric effects <strong>of</strong> the rotated<br />

plans were compared with the original plans. In previous study, the<br />

balloon to skin/chest wall distance, (BtoS Dist.) was the most critical<br />

factor to affect the treatment results. Results for two groups <strong>of</strong><br />

patients were analyzed: (1) BtoS Dist. ≤ 7mm (the small BtoS group) ;(<br />

2) BtoS Dist.>7mm (the large BtoS group).<br />

: A comparison <strong>of</strong> various dosimetric parameters is presented<br />

in the Table. The mean volume <strong>of</strong> PTV_Eval (1cm rind <strong>of</strong> breast tissue<br />

outside <strong>of</strong> the balloon) that received the prescription dose decreased,<br />

for the small BtoS group, from 1.7% ± 2.2% (less than <strong>10</strong>°) to 28.1% ±<br />

25.9% (up to 90°); for the large BtoS group, from 0.7% ± 0.5% (less<br />

than <strong>10</strong>°) to 3.3% ± 3.4% (up to 90°). In general, the increase in the<br />

volumes <strong>of</strong> the <strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OARs) receiving the tolerance doses was<br />

small and did not exceed the tolerance, except for cases where the<br />

OARs were in close proximity to the balloon (3% tumor coverage loss and >36%<br />

maximal dose increase to the OARs, for the small and large BtoS<br />

groups, respectively. However, for small BtoS Dist. ≤ 3mm targets<br />

with the elliptical shape <strong>of</strong> dose cloud, the target coverage and dose<br />

<strong>of</strong> OARs decreased significantly as rotational errors <strong>of</strong> 3° or more<br />

were present.<br />

: Rotational errors should be evaluated carefully for<br />

clinical cases involving small balloon to skin/chest wall distance and<br />

for dose cloud with elliptical shape. For the best dosimetric results,<br />

APBI treatments using Contura should have rotational errors ≤ 3° (BtoS<br />

Dist. ≤ 3mm), ≤ <strong>10</strong>° (BtoS Dist.≤ 7mm) and ≤ 45° (BtoS Dist.> 7mm)<br />

PO335<br />

INVERSE PLANNING OF CONFORMAL HDRPROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

BOOST TECHNIQUE USING TWO CTVS<br />

S. Wolf 1 , G. Bockelmann 1 , F.A. Siebert 1<br />

1 University Hospital SH Campus Kiel, Radiotherapy, Kiel, Germany<br />

: Ultrasoundbased intraoperative HDRprostate<br />

brachytherapy (BT) as boost technique is a well established method in<br />

our clinic. To date the treatment planning is performed manually as<br />

conventional planning technique (CP). Despite the success <strong>of</strong> this<br />

method, the introduction <strong>of</strong> inverse planning techniques (IP) is hoped<br />

to reduce planning time and to decrease user dependency <strong>of</strong> the<br />

planning process itself. In this study the clinical implementation and<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> inverse planning for HDR prostate BT is presented. In<br />

contrast to other HDR prostate techniques the target structure is<br />

segmented into two parts: the peripheral zone <strong>of</strong> the prostate (CTV2)<br />

and the whole prostate gland (CTV2).<br />

: For the patient cohort considered in mean <strong>12</strong><br />

needles were implanted in the typical ushape form. Using 38<br />

different clinical treatment plans appropriate dose constraints for the<br />

IP algorithm (BrachyVision v8.8, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto,<br />

CA) were identified. Prescription doses for CTV1/CTV2 were 15/8.5<br />

Gy. Doses in urethra and rectum should be lower than <strong>10</strong> and 8 Gy,<br />

resp. Because the CTV1 is <strong>of</strong>ten badly visible with ultrasound after<br />

insertion <strong>of</strong> the implant needles, the CTV1 was geometrically defined<br />

by a threedimensional 0.5 cm hull around the implanted needles.<br />

After establishing a general template <strong>of</strong> dose constraints and their<br />

appropriate weightings, applicable to all patient anatomies, all<br />

treatment plans were calculated according the TG43 formalism using<br />

identical start conditions as well: three seconds dwell times in all<br />

dwell positions, calculation time for the IP algorithm in the treatment<br />

planning system was one minute, a maximum dwell time <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> seconds<br />

was allowed, and dwell time smooth function was set to maximum<br />

<strong>10</strong>0%. IP results were compared against the existing clinical CP by<br />

using D90CTV1/2, V200CTV1/2, D2ccrectum, D0.1ccurethra, and COIN index.<br />

Significant statistical differences (pvalue < 0.05) were analyzed by<br />

the MannWhitney rank sum test.<br />

: The inverse planning results in this study were available after<br />

one minute. In contrast to this an experienced medical physicist needs<br />

about <strong>10</strong> to 15 minutes per treatment plan. The results <strong>of</strong> this study<br />

are summarized in table 1. Dosimetric indices are very similar<br />

between CP and IP techniques. Only V200CTV1 is significantly lower for<br />

CP. Moreover the IP technique fairly reduced (not statistical<br />

significant) the D0.1ccurethra.<br />

: This study showed that the usage <strong>of</strong> IP algorithms for<br />

HDR prostate boost techniques with a complex CTV arrangement can<br />

yield similar dosimetric results as a CP technique. Nevertheless<br />

dosimetric results <strong>of</strong> an inverse planning must be checked by an<br />

expert physicist before patient treatment.<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 135<br />

PO336<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY ACTIVITIES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE EUROPEAN<br />

METROLOGY RESEARCH PROGRAMME<br />

T. Schneider 1 , U. Ankerhold 1 , J. Solc 2<br />

1<br />

Phys. Techn. Bundesanstalt (PTB), Dosimetry for Radiation Therapy,<br />

Braunschweig, Germany<br />

2<br />

Czech Metrology Institute, Inspectorate for Ionizing Radiation,<br />

Praha, Czech Republic<br />

: The European Metrology Research Programme<br />

(EMRP) enables European metrology institutes to collaborate with<br />

industrial <strong>org</strong>anisations and academia on joint research projects<br />

within specified fields. The EMRP is implemented by EURAMET e.V.,<br />

<strong>org</strong>anised by 22 European National Metrology Institutes (NMIs),<br />

supported by the European Union and has a budget <strong>of</strong> 400 M€ over an<br />

approximately seven year period. In 2011 a new Joint Research<br />

Project (JRP) in the field dosimetry <strong>of</strong> ionizing radiation was initiated<br />

and approved after a review conference. A part <strong>of</strong> this project covers<br />

the recent developments in brachytherapy. In this presentation an<br />

outline <strong>of</strong> the planned activities for dosimetry in brachytherapy will<br />

be given.<br />

: The work within the new JRP addresses the<br />

establishing <strong>of</strong> miniature xray tubes for the treatment with low<br />

energy photons as well as the work in the community <strong>of</strong> medical<br />

physicists to bring up the treatment modality and treatment planning<br />

to the level already achieved in External Beam Radiation Therapy,<br />

manifested in the work <strong>of</strong> the AAPM TG 186 task group members in<br />

close cooperation with the European society ESTRO.<br />

: The dosimetry system <strong>of</strong> two miniature xray tubes will be<br />

investigated: one from the vendor Carl Zeiss called 'Intrabeam ® ' and<br />

another one from the vendor X<strong>of</strong>t called 'Axxent ® ' tube. The<br />

calibration procedures <strong>of</strong>fered by the vendors are totally different.<br />

The Axxent system uses a well type chamber calibrated in terms <strong>of</strong> Air<br />

Kerma Strength (AKS) for the radiation field <strong>of</strong> I<strong>12</strong>5. Calibration<br />

factor in AKS for the Axxent field are under development (NIST,<br />

Univ. Wisconsin). For the Intrabeam device the calibration is based on<br />

measurements in a water phantom in terms <strong>of</strong> absorbed dose to water<br />

with a s<strong>of</strong>t xray ionization chamber. As no NMI <strong>of</strong>fers calibrations in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> absorbed dose to water DW in a certain depth in a water<br />

phantom in the respective radiation field, this calibration factor is<br />

derived from Air Kerma calibrations and a conversion into DW<br />

according to ICRU 17. The goal <strong>of</strong> the first part <strong>of</strong> the brachytherapy<br />

work is to characterize the sources, to establish a primary standard in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> absorbed dose to water and to give recommendations on a<br />

calibration chain.<br />

: In most publications the results <strong>of</strong> treatment planning<br />

are compared only to MonteCarlo calculations and not to<br />

experimental data. It is the topic <strong>of</strong> the second part <strong>of</strong> the work to<br />

overcome this problem by developing measuring techniques to canvass<br />

the results <strong>of</strong> treatment planning systems in the presence <strong>of</strong> clinical<br />

applicators. For NMIs this means a step apart from the standard fields<br />

usually applied to a complex field close to clinical conditions. The<br />

applied measuring devices will be characterized to achieve an<br />

absolute uncertainty below 2% (k=1) in this irregular, nonstandard<br />

field and the uncertainty <strong>of</strong> the positioning will be below 30 m.<br />

PO337<br />

MAPPING OF RELATIVE DOSE RATE DISTRIBUTION UNCERTAINTY OWING<br />

TO SOURCE CONSTRUCTION<br />

K. Zourari 1 , E. Pantelis 1 , L. Sakelliou 2 , E. Ge<strong>org</strong>iou 1 , P. Papagiannis 1<br />

1<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Athens, Medical School Medical Physics Laboratory,<br />

Athens, Greece<br />

2<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Athens, Physics Department Nuclear and Particle<br />

Physics Section, Athens, Greece<br />

: A joint AAPM/GECESTRO report 1 recommends<br />

that brachytherapy source dosimetry investigators using Monte Carlo<br />

simulation (MC) should determine the effect <strong>of</strong> type B uncertainties<br />

on the quantities proposed for clinical use. This work presents results<br />

<strong>of</strong> a method to map the total uncertainty owing to source construction<br />

related type B uncertainties based on the ISO Guide to the Expression<br />

<strong>of</strong> Uncertainty in Measurement 2 and MC.<br />

: Calculations were performed for one<br />

commercially available <strong>12</strong>5 I LDR seed. 3 Information on the dimensions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the cylindrical silver marker, the thickness <strong>of</strong> its radioactive silver<br />

halide coating, and the dimensions <strong>of</strong> the titanium encapsulation,<br />

were available 3 as: xi±axi. Corresponding standard uncertainties were<br />

calculated assuming uniform probability distributions. Let be a<br />

point in the 2D matrix <strong>of</strong> dose rate per unit air kerma strength on a<br />

plane including the source long axis.<br />

is a function <strong>of</strong> xi (i.e. ) and, assuming f is<br />

approximately linear and no correlation exists between xi, its standard<br />

uncertainty can be calculated according to the law <strong>of</strong> uncertainty<br />

propagation 2 : . MC simulations were<br />

performed to obtain the 2D distribution <strong>of</strong> around the nominal<br />

source design, as well as source designs where each <strong>of</strong> the quantities<br />

xi was individually varied, assuming values <strong>of</strong> xiaxi or xi+axi. This<br />

allowed for the forward and backward finite difference<br />

approximations <strong>of</strong> the partial derivatives in the above equation, and<br />

hence the calculation <strong>of</strong> 2D maps <strong>of</strong> the total standard uncertainty<br />

owing to source construction and the partial contributions to it.<br />

: The figure presents the overall % relative standard<br />

uncertainty <strong>of</strong> around the source (left) compared to the<br />

corresponding type A MC uncertainty (right). As expected, radioactive<br />

coating thickness, followed by end weld radius, were the major<br />

uncertainty contributors affecting mainly points close to the source<br />

longitudinal axis. Uncertainty results at these points are comparable<br />

to the uncertainty <strong>of</strong> NIST traceable SK calibration <strong>of</strong> seeds delivered<br />

to the clinic. 1 The former however is position dependent and<br />

therefore subject to smoothing out when multiple sources are used.<br />

: Results support recommendations 1 that detailed<br />

information on the source should be openly provided by<br />

manufacturers and considered by dosimetry investigators. The<br />

proposed 2D mapping method facilitates the overview <strong>of</strong> total<br />

uncertainty while providing all the input necessary for the calculation<br />

<strong>of</strong> uncertainty <strong>of</strong> TG43 quantities. The brute force implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

MC could be replaced by methods <strong>of</strong> improved computational<br />

efficiency or physically intuitive models.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

Kiveli Zourari was supported by Irakleitos II.<br />

References<br />

1. L. De Werd et al. Med. Phys. 38, 782801, 2011.<br />

2. Guide to the expression <strong>of</strong> uncertainty in measurement, ISO, JCGM<br />

<strong>10</strong>0, 2008.<br />

3. P. Karaiskos et al. Med. Phys. 28, 1753–1760, 2001.


S136 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

PO338<br />

VAGINAL CUFF BRACHYTHERAPY USING OVOIDS: COMPARISON OF<br />

POINT BASED AND TARGET BASED PRESCRIPTION<br />

S. Sharma 1 , D. Manigandan 1 , A.K. Gandhi 1 , D.N. Sharma 1 , V.<br />

Subramani 1 , P.K. Julka 1 , G.K. Rath 1<br />

1<br />

All India Institute <strong>of</strong> Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Radiation Oncology,<br />

Delhi, India<br />

: To compare the treatment plans with point based<br />

and target dose point based prescription methods for vaginal cuff<br />

brachytherapy with two ovoids.<br />

: Twenty previously treated sessions <strong>of</strong> post<br />

operative carcinoma uterine cervix patients were studied. For all the<br />

patients, application was done by using two Fletcher ovoids under<br />

sedation. After application, CT scan was done at 3mm slice thickness.<br />

The target volume was contoured and it assumed to be around the<br />

applicator, however, in some cases, modification was done according<br />

to the clinical and planning CT findings. Similarly, <strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OAR)<br />

i.e. bladder and rectum were contoured. The ICRU38 bladder and<br />

rectum points were also marked on CT images. Applicators were<br />

reconstructed using 2.5mm source step size and plans were generated<br />

for Nucletron HDRV2 machine using PLATO planning system. In both<br />

the ovoids, first four dwell positions were activated and dose<br />

prescription was done by using two different prescription methods.<br />

One is conventional point dose (PD) based and the second is target<br />

dose point (TDP) based. For conventional PD method, the dose<br />

prescription point was at 5mm above the superior surface <strong>of</strong> mid<br />

dwell position <strong>of</strong> two ovoids. For TDP based method, target dose<br />

points were created 5mm around the target. No optimization was<br />

done after prescription. For comparison purposes, dose was<br />

prescribed at <strong>10</strong>0cGy. For plan evaluation, following dose volume<br />

indices were used: Volume <strong>of</strong> target that receive <strong>10</strong>0% (V<strong>10</strong>0), 95%<br />

(V95), and 90% (V90) <strong>of</strong> prescription dose, coverage index<br />

(CI=V<strong>10</strong>0/Target volume) and overdose volume index (OI=V200/V<strong>10</strong>0). For<br />

bladder and rectum, doses received by 0.1cc (D0.1cc), 1cc (D1cc), 2cc<br />

(D2cc), 5cc (D5cc), and <strong>10</strong>cc (D<strong>10</strong>cc) <strong>of</strong> volumes were noted. The ICRU38<br />

bladder and rectum point doses were also noted to correlate with<br />

volumetric doses.<br />

: The plan comparison is summarized in Table.1. Volumetric<br />

evaluation shows that target coverage was lower in PD based plans<br />

than the TDP based plans. However, the OI index shows that high dose<br />

volume was more in TDP based plans compared to PD plans. In<br />

addition, the OAR doses were higher in TDP based method than the PD<br />

based. In the both TDP and PD methods, the bladder doses received<br />

by 0.1cc, 1cc, 2cc and 5cc volumes were higher compared to ICRU38<br />

bladder point doses and doses to <strong>10</strong>cc bladder volume were in closer<br />

agreement with the ICRU38 bladder points. Similarly, for rectum, the<br />

doses received by 0.1cc, and 1cc volumes were higher compared to<br />

ICRU38 rectum point doses and doses to 2–5cc volume <strong>of</strong> rectum were<br />

in closer agreement with the ICRU38 rectum points.<br />

: In the CT guided PD prescription method, lesser target<br />

coverage and lower OAR doses were observed. In TDP based<br />

prescription, target coverage was higher and resulted in higher OAR<br />

doses. Doses received by <strong>10</strong>cc <strong>of</strong> bladder and 2–5cc <strong>of</strong> rectum were<br />

closer to ICRU38 bladder and rectum points, respectively.<br />

PO339<br />

MRIDUMMY MARKERS OF MRIGUIDED HDR BRACHYTHERAPY FOR<br />

INTERSTITIAL PROSTATE AND INTRACAVITARY GYN CANCERS<br />

J. Schindel 1 , M. Muruganandham 1 , A. Eagle 2 , M. Hewitt 2 , T.<br />

Stockman 2 , C. Pigge 3 , Y. Kim 1<br />

1<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Iowa, Radiation Oncology, Iowa City, USA<br />

2<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Iowa, Electrical Computer Engineering, Iowa City, USA<br />

3<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Iowa, Chemistry, Iowa City, USA<br />

: Compare seven different MRIdummy markers for<br />

interstitial prostate and intracavitary GYN HDR brachytherapy.<br />

: Seven markers were used: Saline, Conray60<br />

(Mallinckrodt medical), CuSO4 (1.5g/L), liquid Vitamin E, fish oil, 1%<br />

Agarose gel (AGEL: 1g Agarose powder/ <strong>10</strong>0 ml distilled water), and a<br />

cobaltchloride complex contrast (C4) (CoCl2: Glycine=4:1). Interstitial<br />

and intracavitary phantoms were designed. The interstitial phantom<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> eight flexi needles (outer/inner diameter <strong>of</strong><br />

1.98mm/1.45mm) that were filled with each MRImarker and<br />

embedded in 450 mL <strong>of</strong> 3% AGEL. The intracavitary phantom consisted<br />

<strong>of</strong> 4L <strong>of</strong> 3% AGEL, a plastic tandem and ring applicator (Varian), and<br />

MRIdummy catheters (outer/inner diameter <strong>of</strong> 2.66mm/1.87mm).<br />

Clinical 3T MRI protocols (both T1weightedMRI (T1MRI:1mm slice<br />

thickness) and T2weightedMRI scans (T2MRI: 3mm slice thickness))<br />

were used. Signal intensities for each marker were characterized as<br />

percentages compared to the 3% AGEL background using ImageJ<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />

: Some interstitial markers, even though small agent volume,<br />

could generate favorable signals (> <strong>10</strong>0%), implying their feasibility for<br />

MRIguided prostate HDR. The markers <strong>of</strong> CuSO4, C4, and Vitamin E on<br />

T1MRI and 1% AGEL, Saline, and fish oil on T2MRI showed higher than<br />

<strong>10</strong>0% signals on both phantoms. The volume effect on signals was<br />

found due to different marker volumes in the different dummy<br />

catheters. The markers <strong>of</strong> CuSO4 and Saline showed highest signals on<br />

T1MRI and T2MRI, respectively. Sourcereconstruction is<br />

recommended on T1MRI, so CuSO4 and C4 markers have great<br />

potentials as a dummy marker for both interstitial and intracavitary<br />

brachytherapy.<br />

: The use <strong>of</strong> interstitial markers for MRIguided prostate<br />

HDR seems feasible. The markers <strong>of</strong> CuSO4 and C4 showed<br />

considerably high signals on T1MRI, as did Saline on T2MRI, for<br />

interstitial needles for prostate HDR and for a tandemandring<br />

applicator for GYN.<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 137<br />

PO340<br />

DOSIMETRIC IMPACT OF NOT CORRECTING FOR THE DISTAL SHIFT<br />

REPORTED IN VARIAN TANDEM AND RING (T&R) APPLICATORS<br />

O. Craciunescu 1 , J. Sánchez Mazón 2 , L. Lan 3 , J. Maurer 1 , B. Steffey 1 ,<br />

J. Cai 1 , J. Adamson 1 , J. Chino 1<br />

1<br />

Duke University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Durham NC,<br />

USA<br />

2<br />

Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Servicio de Radi<strong>of</strong>ísica<br />

y Protección Radiológica, Santander, Spain<br />

3<br />

Duke University Medical Center, Department <strong>of</strong> Biostatistics and<br />

Bioinformatics, Durham NC, USA<br />

: Studies have shown that source stop positions<br />

within Varian’s HDR CT/MR compatible ring applicators can deviate<br />

from the intended positions by several millimeters, and that a<br />

corrective shift has to be applied to limit the effect <strong>of</strong> these inherent<br />

<strong>of</strong>fsets. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to investigate the dosimetric<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> NOT applying this correction.<br />

: Twentyseven HDR T&R clinical plans (cP)<br />

from six different patients treated for cervical cancer in our clinic<br />

were used in this study. Both CT and MR were acquired for each plan.<br />

The dose per fraction was 5.5 Gy. GECESTRO guidelines were<br />

followed for HRCTV and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OARs): bladder, rectum,<br />

sigmoid. ICRU 38 points A were also defined. The planning was done in<br />

BrachyVision with a hybrid volume optimization method based on<br />

HRCTV and ABS recommended reference lines. Depending on the<br />

shape <strong>of</strong> the HRCTV, the posterior ring dwell positions were allowed<br />

in the optimization for 5 patients. For 1 patient, a standard ring<br />

loading that mimicks ovoid placement was used. To show the<br />

dosimetric impact <strong>of</strong> NOT applying distal corrections, plans were<br />

generated by shifting the dwells in the ring in the opposite direction<br />

incrementally by 1 5 mm. The plans were calculated using the TG43<br />

formalism and ACUROS, a modelbased analytical solver that<br />

accounts for inhomogeneities. To establish clinical significance, the<br />

mean percent difference between all metrics in each <strong>of</strong> the shifted<br />

plans and the cP were calculated. The Wilcoxon signedrank test was<br />

used to determine if the differences have any statistical significance,<br />

for all cases together, but also separating patients depending on the<br />

ring dwells activated.<br />

: For brevity, only D2cc results for OARs for all 27 plans are<br />

presented. Ring loading strategy did not impact the dosmetric results.<br />

The mean percent differences between the largest shift (5mm) and<br />

the cP for the D2cc bladder, rectum and sigmoid were 1.6, 1.7, 2.5%<br />

for TG43, and 1.2, 1.8 and 1.4 % for ACUROS. The Wilcoxon rank sum<br />

pvalues were > 0.05 for all the OAR metrics, shift amounts, and<br />

method <strong>of</strong> calculation. For A_RT, A_LT and HRCTV D90, the mean<br />

percent differences were 0.8, 0.5 and 0.6 %, and 0.6, 0.8 and 0.9 %<br />

for TG43 and ACUROS, respectively. However, the Wilcoxon signed<br />

rank pvalues for Point A_RT were < 0.05 for both TG43 and ACUROS,<br />

for all shifts. Only when using ACUROS, the pvalues for HRCTV D90<br />

were < 0.05 for all shifts.<br />

: The dosimetric impact <strong>of</strong> NOT applying corrective shifts<br />


S138 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

measurements. The dose rate was calculated following a modification<br />

<strong>of</strong> the AAPM Task Group 61 protocol.<br />

: Azimuthal anisotropy measurements performed with film and<br />

TLD show good agreement as shown in Figure 1c. The TLD polar<br />

anisotropy measurements agree well with the MCNP5 predicted values<br />

as also shown in Figure 1d, but exhibit slight anisotropy not predicted<br />

by MCNP5. The DRC, as measured with the Exradin A16 chamber and<br />

corrected with egs_chamber simulations, was 0.536 cGyh 1 U 1 , which is<br />

8% higher than the previously measured TLD value.<br />

Figure 1: a. Film insert. b. Polar TLD insert. c. Azimuthal anisotropy<br />

results. d. Polar anisotropy results.<br />

: This phantom allows a convenient and practical means<br />

to measure azimuthal and polar anisotropy. It was also possible to<br />

measure the doserate constant with an ionization chamber, provided<br />

the appropriate corrections are made. This phantom allows users <strong>of</strong><br />

the Axxent system to easily verify the absorbed dose to water<br />

parameters <strong>of</strong> TG43 without the use <strong>of</strong> liquid water.<br />

PO343<br />

COMPARISION OF TG43 AND ACUROS DOSE CALCULATION ALGORITHM<br />

FOR VARIOUS APPLICATORS USED IN HDR GYN BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

J. Swamidas 1 , U. Mahantshetty 2 , S.K. Shrivatava 2 , D.D. Deshpande 1<br />

1 Tata Memorial Hospital, Medical Physics, Mumbai, India<br />

2 Tata Memorial Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Mumbai, India<br />

: The current brachytherapy dose calculation<br />

formalism assumes a homogeneous water medium that doesnot<br />

incorporate the effect <strong>of</strong> radiation scatter, tissue or applicator<br />

heterogeneities. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to quantify the<br />

dosimetric effects <strong>of</strong> tissue heterogeneities and various applicator<br />

materials used in HDR Gynaecological <strong>Brachytherapy</strong><br />

: Three series <strong>of</strong> CT images <strong>of</strong> patients<br />

undergoing HDR brachytherapy for cancer <strong>of</strong> uterine cervix were used<br />

for this retrospective analysis. Each <strong>of</strong> the CT image series was<br />

selected to have different applicator material. The applicators were<br />

a) Ring applicator made <strong>of</strong> stainless steel (SS) material b) Vienna<br />

Applicator made <strong>of</strong> plastic/polymer material and c) Tandem/Ovoid<br />

applicator made <strong>of</strong> Titanium. CT images <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> these applicators<br />

were transferred to the Treatment Planning System (Brachyvision<br />

v<strong>10</strong>). High Risk CTV, rectum, bladder and sigmoid were delineated<br />

based on GEC ESTRO recommendations. Two plans with 7Gy as dose<br />

prescription to HRCTV were generated for each image series. Dose<br />

calculation was carried out using TG43 and ACUROS dose calculation<br />

algorithm for Iridium192 HDR classic source (Nucletron). Dose volume<br />

parameters recommended by GEC ESTRO recommendations were<br />

calculated. In addition, volume receiving 50%, <strong>10</strong>0%, 200% and 400%<br />

isodose lines also were calculated to evaluate low and high dose<br />

variations. Dose to Point A, ICRU bladder and rectal point also were<br />

determined and used for this comparative analysis.<br />

: The table below shows the variation in dose to water in<br />

water as compared to heterogeneity corrected dose to tissue in tissue<br />

for different types <strong>of</strong> applicators. Average variation <strong>of</strong> all the dose<br />

volume parameters for applicator made from SS and Titanium<br />

material is 3.3 (±0.9)% and 3.1(± 1.1)% respectively as compared to<br />

polymer applicator <strong>of</strong> 1.2(± 0.9)% with ACUROS as compared to TG43.<br />

Also, the low dose region (V50%) has more variation as compared the<br />

high dose regions (V400%). For all the three applicators, it was found<br />

that TG43 formalism over estimates the dose as compared to ACUROS<br />

dose calculation algorithm.<br />

Parameters SS Polymer Titanium<br />

HRCTV D90 3.0 0.5 3.0<br />

HRCTV D<strong>10</strong>0 3.1 0.3 2.9<br />

HRCTV V<strong>10</strong>0 1.3 0.3 2.1<br />

BLD2cc 3.9 0.8 1.7<br />

RD2cc 3.4 0.5 4.5<br />

SD2cc 3.5 1.2 3.3<br />

ICRU BL 2.4 1.5 2.9<br />

ICRU R 3.9 3.0 4.0<br />

V50% 4.8 0.5 4.5<br />

V<strong>10</strong>0% 4.1 0.5 4.2<br />

V200% 3.6 1.7 3.8<br />

V400% 4.0 3.0 2.8<br />

PTA RT 2.8 1.5 1.8<br />

PTA LT 2.0 1.7 1.2<br />

: The present study is an attempt to quantify the<br />

applicator and tissue heterogeneities for commonly used applicators<br />

in realistic conditions related to HDR Gynecological <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>.<br />

The TG 43 algorithm overestimates the doses as compared to ACUROS.<br />

The magnitude <strong>of</strong> variation depends on the applicator material with<br />

highest for applicators made <strong>of</strong> stainless steel and titanium and least<br />

for polymer material. Defining applicator material and incorporating<br />

anticipated variations may further add to existing quality assurance<br />

program for GYN <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> planning.<br />

PO344<br />

INVIVO DOSIMETRY IN HDR BRACHYTHERAPY: THE EFFECT OF<br />

TEMPERATURE VARIATION AND SIMULATED POSITION CHANGES<br />

O. Hayman 1 , A. Palmer 2 , S. Williams 1<br />

1<br />

Queen Alexandra Hospital, Medical Physics Department, Portsmouth,<br />

United Kingdom<br />

2<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Surrey, Medical Physics Department & Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />

Engineering and Physical Science, Guildford, United Kingdom<br />

: Invivo dosimetry provides real time feedback on<br />

patient set up and <strong>org</strong>an at risk dosimetry for both rectum and<br />

bladder at treatment. Clinical studies had demonstrated the need for<br />

further characterisation and a full understanding <strong>of</strong> the diode system<br />

functionality. [1]<br />

This study aimed to characterise the use <strong>of</strong> diodes in Co60 cervical<br />

cancer treatment using the HDR MultiSource (Eckert & Ziegler BEBIG)<br />

with integrated diodes (PTW). Temperature dependence <strong>of</strong> the diode<br />

response was assessed at typical calibration (room) temperature<br />

(22.8 o C) and internal rectal temperature (34.4 – 37.8 o C) for bladder<br />

and rectal dosimetry systems. Effects <strong>of</strong> positional uncertainty were<br />

evaluated with a treatment planning study correlating measured and<br />

predicted doses.<br />

[1] Invivo dosimetry for gynaecological brachytherapy: physical and<br />

clinical considerations, Wadhäusl C et al 2005<br />

: 20 patient's CT images were used to<br />

determine the mean position <strong>of</strong> the rectal and bladder invivo diodes.<br />

corresponding to planning ref points, in relation to the HDR<br />

applicator. An inhouse jig was designed for the Eckert & Ziegler split<br />

ring and IUT applicator in water. The stability and reproducibility <strong>of</strong><br />

the rectal and bladder diode system was assessed at calibration<br />

temperature <strong>of</strong> 22.8 o C. The temperature was elevated to a maximum<br />

37 o C and change in response <strong>of</strong> the rectal and bladder probes<br />

determined. The diode immersion time at the higher temperature was<br />

representative <strong>of</strong> clinical use within the patient. A treatment planning<br />

study was conducted to assess the maximum position uncertainty,<br />

using the range <strong>of</strong> dose difference established in the rectal and<br />

bladder diode measurements. Each diode's dose range was plotted<br />

separately and compared with the volume doses for both rectum and<br />

bladder.<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 139<br />

: The mean rectal diode dose was 2.8 Gy (sd 0.04) compared<br />

to planned dose 2.5Gy. The mean bladder diode dose was 4.0 Gy (sd<br />

0.05) with planned dose 3.9 Gy. At the elevated body temperature,<br />

rectal dose was 2.8 Gy (sd 0.01) and bladder dose 4.1 Gy (sd 0.05).<br />

The difference in predicted to measured readings ranged from 0.2 to<br />

0.4 Gy for the bladder and rectal diodes individually. Applying this<br />

dose range to each diode position on the treatment plan, the largest<br />

positional uncertainty was ±7.5mm with a dose range <strong>of</strong> ±0.3Gy.<br />

The bladder diode dose correlated well with the D2cc for the bladder<br />

<strong>of</strong> 3.9Gy but the rectal diodes correlated better with D5cc <strong>of</strong> 3.3Gy.<br />

: Stability and reproducibility are clinically acceptable for<br />

this integrated diode system. No diode sensitivity variation with<br />

temperature was observed in typical clinical conditions. The<br />

Positioning <strong>of</strong> the diodes is <strong>of</strong> primary concern for accurate use and<br />

correlation to treatment planning reference points. Image guidance<br />

during treatment and retrospective planning using DRRs must be<br />

utilised to fully exploit the usefulness <strong>of</strong> the diodes.<br />

PO345<br />

INTERSEED ATTENUATION IN PROSTATE I<strong>12</strong>5 SEED IMPLANT<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY: EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL INVESTIGATION<br />

P. Bownes 1 , J. Mason 1 , B. AlQaisieh 1 , A. Henry 2 , D. Thwaites 3<br />

1<br />

St James Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS<br />

Trust, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics, Leeds, United Kingdom<br />

2<br />

St James Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS<br />

Trust, Clinical Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom<br />

3<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Institute <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics School <strong>of</strong> Physics,<br />

Sydney, Australia<br />

: In prostate permanent seed implant<br />

brachytherapy the actual dose delivered to the patient may be less<br />

than that calculated by TG43 due to interseed attenuation (ISA). In<br />

this study Monte Carlo (MC) simulation is used to quantify ISA.<br />

Experimental verification <strong>of</strong> MC simulation results is performed using<br />

a MOSFET dosimeter. 15 post implant treatment plans are simulated<br />

to quantify the clinical effects <strong>of</strong> ISA. Results for the Oncura 6711 and<br />

Thinseed seed models are compared. Thinseed has the same design as<br />

the well known 6711 model but has 0.5mm diameter compared to<br />

0.8mm for 6711 and a correspondingly thinner radioopaque marker.<br />

: Dose measurements using a MOSFET in a<br />

Perspex phantom for an implant <strong>of</strong> 36 seeds were compared to MC<br />

simulation results. For the clinical study, 15 recently treated CT based<br />

post implant plans were simulated using both 6711 and Thinseed. 7<br />

patients were treated with standard activity seeds (0.458U) and 8<br />

patients were treated with lower activity seeds (average 0.396U). ISA<br />

was quantified by comparing DVH values for full MC simulation<br />

(includes the ISA effect) to an MC superposition dose calculated using<br />

single seed MC simulation results (ignores the ISA effect). DVH<br />

calculation code was benchmarked by comparing MC superposition<br />

dose to output from Variseed using source data calculated from single<br />

seed MC simulation, and to output from Variseed using TG43U1<br />

consensus source data.<br />

: MC simulation results were validated by MOSFET<br />

measurements although difficulties included variability in repeat<br />

readings at low dose rates and drift in MOSFET calibration response.<br />

The mean ISA effect on DVH parameters (calculated from the<br />

difference between full MC simulation and MC superposition), for the<br />

15 clinical post implant plans using the 6711 seed was prostate: D90 <br />

2.8%, V<strong>10</strong>0 1.4%, V150 5.3%; urethra D<strong>10</strong> 2.5%, V150 14%; rectum<br />

D2cc 4.4% V<strong>10</strong>0 25%. For the Thinseed the ISA effect was lower with<br />

mean values for prostate: D90 1.6%, V<strong>10</strong>0 0.8%, V150 3.2%; urethra<br />

D<strong>10</strong> 1.4%, V150 8%; rectum D2cc 2.5% V<strong>10</strong>0 15%. DVH benchmarking<br />

work showed that that the difference between single source MC<br />

simulation and TG43U1 consensus parameters for the 6711 seed had a<br />

slightly larger effect on DVH parameters than ISA: for example for the<br />

prostate average differences were D90 4.2%, V<strong>10</strong>0 2.0%, V150 7.6%.<br />

There was little difference in ISA effects between the standard<br />

activity and lower activity groups <strong>of</strong> patients.<br />

: Experimental validation <strong>of</strong> MC simulation <strong>of</strong> complex I<br />

<strong>12</strong>5 seed arrangements is feasible. ISA causes DVH values for clinical I<br />

<strong>12</strong>5 seed implants to be lower compared to TG43 dose calculations.<br />

ISA effects are reduced for a seed model that is less attenuating.<br />

PO346<br />

MEASUREMENTS AROUND AN ELECTRONIC BRACHYTHERAPY SOURCE<br />

USING LITHIUM FORMATE EPR DOSIMETERS AND GAFCHROMIC FILM<br />

E. Adolfsson 1 , S. White 2 , G. Landry 2 , G. Alm Carlsson 1 , H. Gustafsson 1 ,<br />

E. Lund 1 , B. Reniers 2 , F. Verhaegen 2 , A. Carlsson Tedgren 3<br />

1<br />

Linköping University, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical and Health Sciences<br />

(IMH) Radiation Physics, Linköping, Sweden<br />

2<br />

Maastricht University Medical Center, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />

Oncology (MAASTRO) GROW School for Oncology and Developmental<br />

Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands<br />

3<br />

Swedish Radiation Safety Authority, (SSM), Stockholm, Sweden<br />

: In this work, the aim was to test two different<br />

dosimetry systems, lithium formate EPR dosimeters and GafChromic<br />

film for dose verification measurements around a 50 kV X<strong>of</strong>t Axxent<br />

source.<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> electronic xray brachytherapy sources (EBS) has increased as<br />

an alternative to radionuclides in brachytherapy. The low energy (50<br />

kV) in combination with the steep dose gradient around the EBS makes<br />

it difficult to perform accurate dose verification measurements. It is<br />

<strong>of</strong> great interest to identify dosimetry systems that are capable <strong>of</strong><br />

performing absolute dosimetric measurements around such sources.<br />

One option is to use solid state detectors which can be made small<br />

enough to resolve the gradients. Both lithium formate EPR (electron<br />

paramagnetic resonance) dosimeters and GafChromic film are<br />

potentially suitable for this purpose.<br />

To determine absorbed dose to water, calibration in a well known<br />

radiation quality that provides traceability to a primary standard is<br />

needed. The calibration radiation quality can be similar to that under<br />

investigation but is most <strong>of</strong>ten a MV or 60 Co field as suggested by the<br />

AAPM TG43U1 for absolute dosimetry using LiF TLDs. When<br />

calibrating dosimeters in a different radiation quality than used for<br />

measurements, a correction for the different intrinsic response, fLET<br />

(caused by different ionization densities (LET) <strong>of</strong> the secondary<br />

electrons) is needed for highest accuracy in results.<br />

: Measurements were performed in a PMMA<br />

phantom. Four EPR dosimeters (cylinders with height 5 mm, diameter<br />

4.5 mm) were positioned radially with their centers at 3 and 5 cm<br />

from the EBS. GafChromic film was positioned on top <strong>of</strong> the EPR<br />

dosimeters. The EPR dosimeters were calibrated in a MV photon beam<br />

and the film in a well characterized 50 kV xray beam.<br />

The dose to film was evaluated with the triple channel method using<br />

an Epson v700 film scanner and the manufacturer’s (ISP) s<strong>of</strong>tware,<br />

FILMQA pro. The EPR dosimeters were read out in a BRUKER EleXsys<br />

E580 spectrometer with a standard cavity ER 4<strong>10</strong>2ST.<br />

To determine absorbed dose to water in the PMMA phantom at a<br />

certain distance r from the source, correction for the volume<br />

averaging effect in the EPR dosimeters was obtained from Monte Carlo<br />

(MC) simulations. MC simulations were also used to account for the<br />

different positions <strong>of</strong> the EPR dosimeters and the Gafchromic film in<br />

the phantom.<br />

: Absorbed doses to water in the phantom determined by the<br />

lithium formate EPR dosimeters agreed with the absorbed doses<br />

determined by the films within the estimated uncertainties and<br />

differences were less than <strong>10</strong>%.<br />

: The results from the two dosimetry systems conform to<br />

a high degree <strong>of</strong> certainty which indicates that they are suitable for<br />

this application.<br />

PO347<br />

ARE TISSUE AND APPLICATOR HETEROGENEITIES EFFECT IMPORTANT IN<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY TPS? A REAL CASE<br />

A. Pereira 1 , R. Pirraco 1 , T. Viterbo 1 , L. Salgado 2 , L. Carvalho 2 , L.<br />

Trigo 2 , J. Lencart 1<br />

1<br />

Instituto Português de Oncologia, Fisica Médica, Porto, Portugal<br />

2<br />

Instituto Português de Oncologia, Serviço Braquiterapia, Porto,<br />

Portugal<br />

: The aim <strong>of</strong> this work is to quantify the difference<br />

in delivered dose when different types <strong>of</strong> cylindrical applicators are<br />

used in gynaecological brachytherapy, considering that the Treatment<br />

Planning System (TPS) algorithm do not have heterogeneities<br />

correction.<br />

: In our department endometrial tumours are


S140 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

treated with two types <strong>of</strong> commercial cylindrical applicators: the<br />

Vaginal Applicator Set and the Shielded Cylindrical Applicator Set for<br />

high dose rate brachytherapy, from Nucletron. The former type has<br />

massive structure and the later is hollow, allowing the introduction <strong>of</strong><br />

tungsten shielding (which we do not normally use). CT image based<br />

plans are performed and the dose prescription points are located at<br />

0,5 cm from the applicator surface. As our TPS (Oncentra Masterplan<br />

4.1) does not take into account medium heterogeneities, there is a<br />

difference between the calculated and delivered doses at the<br />

prescription points when either type <strong>of</strong> applicator is used.<br />

To evaluate these differences, we performed the HDR treatments<br />

(Nucletron microSelectron V3) on a phantom, with both types <strong>of</strong><br />

cylinders, with 3,0 cm and 3,5 cm diameters, and measured the<br />

delivered dose along the prescription points with a five Mosfet array<br />

(TN 252LA5 MOSFET, Best Medical Canada).<br />

: We observed a difference between the doses delivered at the<br />

prescription points with the Vaginal Applicator Set and Shielded<br />

Cylindrical Applicator <strong>of</strong> 5.4% for the 3.0cm cylinders and 5.2% for the<br />

3.5cm cylinders.<br />

: The obtained results suggest that further investigations<br />

are made, specially if we consider using the tungsten shielding. The<br />

use <strong>of</strong> an algorithm with heterogeneity correction is <strong>of</strong> high<br />

importance.<br />

Further work will be done in order to validate these results with<br />

Monte Carlo simulations.<br />

PO348<br />

EVALUATION OF THE TRACHEA INHOMOGENETY EFFECT ON DOSE<br />

CALCULATIONS OF ESOPHAGUS HDR BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

S.M. Hosseini Daghigh 1 , R. Jaberi 2 , S.R. Mahdavi 2 , S.M.R. Aghamiri 1 , H.<br />

Baghani 1 , E. Boroghani 3 , R. Eidi 1<br />

1<br />

Shahid Baheshty University, Radiation Medicine, Tehran, Iran Islamic<br />

Republic <strong>of</strong><br />

2<br />

Tehran University <strong>of</strong> Medical Science, medical physics, Tehran, Iran<br />

Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong><br />

3<br />

Guilan University, physics, Tehran, Iran Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong><br />

: Dose calculations in esophagus High Dose Rate<br />

(HDR) <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> treatment planning systems (TPS) are greatly<br />

based on TG43 protocol which in, all materials are considered to be<br />

water equivalent.<br />

Regarding to Locating the trachea near the esophagus and considering<br />

the air inside it equivalent to water in TPS may introduce a<br />

considerable error in dose calculations.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> this research is surveying the effect <strong>of</strong> air within trachea<br />

on dose calculations <strong>of</strong> Flexiplan TPS in esophagus HDR<br />

brachytherapy.<br />

: To do so, we used a cylindrical PMMA<br />

phantom with a tube in the center (esophagus equivalent) with 20mm<br />

diameter and a tube in 24mm distance from the center (trachea<br />

equivalent) with 18mm diameter and the PMMA cylinders with<br />

external diameter <strong>of</strong> 20mm and a hole with diameter that was equal<br />

to the external diameter <strong>of</strong> each applicator was created within it, so<br />

that the thickness <strong>of</strong> the thinnest part <strong>of</strong> the wall in each cylinder was<br />

1 mm. the structure <strong>of</strong> described phantom has been shown in<br />

following figure.<br />

Esophagus brachytherapy applicators with various diameters (6, 8, <strong>10</strong><br />

and 20mm) were placed into related cylinders and finally inserted in<br />

esophagus tube. The irradiation was performed using Flexitron remote<br />

afterloading system. In this system, HDR implants are achived by<br />

moving a single high strength Ir192 source. Associated Treatment<br />

planning system with this afterloading unit is Flexiplan that was used<br />

to design treatment plan that loads a special dose at interested<br />

points.<br />

EDR2 radiography films were used for dosimetry at reference point in<br />

esophagus HDR brachytherapy (between esophagus and trachea wall <br />

14mm distance from center) and posterior wall <strong>of</strong> trachea (33mm<br />

distance from center).<br />

: The results <strong>of</strong> treatment planning and practical dosimetry (2<br />

times measurements) in mentioned positions have been showed in the<br />

following table. Difference between acquired results has been showed<br />

too.<br />

: The results show that there is a meaningful difference<br />

between practical dosimetry and treatment planning results (Pvalue<br />


S142 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

measurements which however showed much reduced values (in<br />

Sv/hr) are a consequence <strong>of</strong> structural shielding by concrete walls<br />

and leadembedded doors.<br />

: It is essential to include checks <strong>of</strong> radiation levels in<br />

treatment and control rooms in daily quality assurance tests.<br />

Measurements while source position indicator was in use were<br />

comparable to corresponding irradiation values with ring applicators<br />

in patients. Therefore, radiation readings during source visual test<br />

should be given necessary attention as typical <strong>of</strong> likely measurements<br />

when brachytherapy irradiation <strong>of</strong> patients is actually in progress.<br />

PO352<br />

MODULATION RESTRICTIONS DO NOT NECESSARILY IMPROVE<br />

TREATMENT PLAN QUALITY FOR HDR PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

M. Balvert 1 , B. Gorissen 1 , D. den Hertog 1 , A. H<strong>of</strong>fmann 2<br />

1<br />

Tilburg University, Dept. Econometrics and Operations Research,<br />

Tilburg, The Netherlands<br />

2<br />

MAASTRO Clinic, Medical Physics, Maastricht, The Netherlands<br />

: Inverse optimization algorithms in interstitial<br />

HDR prostate brachytherapy may produce solutions with large dwell<br />

time variations within catheters. An undesirable property is that<br />

dominant dwell positions result in selective highdose volumes (i.e.,<br />

hot spots). A dwell time modulation restriction (DTMR) has been<br />

suggested and is used in planning s<strong>of</strong>tware to eliminate this problem.<br />

Additionally, such DTMRs are used to reduce the sensitivity for<br />

uncertainties in dwell positions that inevitably result from catheter<br />

reconstruction errors and source positioning inaccuracy <strong>of</strong> the<br />

afterloader. The aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to quantify the reduction <strong>of</strong> hot<br />

spots and the robustness against these uncertainties by applying a<br />

DTMR to templatebased HDR prostate brachytherapy implants.<br />

: For catheter reconstruction, the<br />

measurement error in defining the tip was estimated to be 2 mm in<br />

any direction. An additional error due to the source positioning<br />

inaccuracy <strong>of</strong> the afterloader (±1 mm) was considered separately.<br />

Three different DTMRs were consecutively applied to existing dose<br />

based and dosevolume based optimization models, limiting the<br />

relative differences, absolute differences, or summed squared<br />

differences between neighboring dwell positions. The models were<br />

solved for various restriction levels, ranging from no restriction to<br />

uniform dwell times within catheters. The errors were simulated<br />

uniformly at least 1.000 times on representative clinical cases. For<br />

each resulting dose distribution, hot spot indices and DVH statistics<br />

for the PTV, rectum and urethra were computed. These indices<br />

comprise global and local measures, respectively given by the dose<br />

homogeneity index (DHI) computed as (V<strong>10</strong>0V150)/V<strong>10</strong>0, and the newly<br />

introduced V150c, being the largest contiguous volume receiving 150%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the prescribed dose.<br />

: None <strong>of</strong> the DTMRs could improve the nominal value,<br />

simulated sample mean or variance <strong>of</strong> DHI or V150c without<br />

simultaneously reducing V<strong>10</strong>0. Moreover, the simulated sample<br />

variance <strong>of</strong> V<strong>10</strong>0 was not decreased by any DTMR. Preliminary results<br />

for the afterloader inaccuracy are consistent with these results.<br />

: No improvement in robustness against uncertainty in<br />

dwell position measurement and afterloader precision was obtained<br />

by applying a DTMR for the dosebased and dosevolume based<br />

optimization models. We recommend not to use any <strong>of</strong> the three<br />

DTMRs for inverse treatment planning optimization in HDR prostate<br />

brachytherapy implants.<br />

PO353<br />

CLINICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE HDR CAPRIÔ APPLICATOR<br />

B. Steffey 1 , O. Craciunescu 1 , J. Cai 1 , J. Adamson 1 , J. Chino 1<br />

1<br />

Duke University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Durham NC,<br />

USA<br />

: The Capri applicator (Varian Corp.) is a new<br />

HDR CTcompatible brachytherapy (BT) applicator marketed to better<br />

sculpt the radiotherapy dose and improve patient comfort. It is a 13<br />

catheter balloon that is inflated upon insertion to conform to patient's<br />

anatomy. In this study we characterize this applicator by investigating<br />

the dosimetry as it compares with a stump vaginal cylinder, and the<br />

manufacturer's stated relative catheter positions.<br />

: Six patients received HDR brachytherapy<br />

using the Capri applicator for the treatment <strong>of</strong> vaginal (4), recurrent<br />

endometrial (1), and recurrent ovarian (1) cancers involving the<br />

vagina. All patients received external beam radiation therapy<br />

followed by 5 Gy x 45 fractions <strong>of</strong> HDR BT. For each insertion,<br />

MR/CTbased HRCTV volumes were delineated for treatment planning.<br />

GECESTRO guidelines were followed for dose volume constraints for<br />

the <strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OARs): bladder, rectum, sigmoid and bowel. The<br />

planning was done in BrachyVision using the volume optimization<br />

technique. Depending on the HRCTV shape and location, 411<br />

catheters were used. Plans were calculated using the TG43 formalism<br />

and with ACUROS, a modelbased analytical solver that accounts for<br />

tissue inhomogeneities. Retrospectively, for dosimetry comparison,<br />

planning was also done using a 3.5 cm stump cylinder(SC) with the<br />

dose prescribed at 0.5 cm in tissue. HRCTV D90, bladder, rectum,<br />

sigmoid and bowel D2cc were compared between the two plans<br />

(CAPRI vs SC). Twentyeight CAPRI applicators were imaged after<br />

TX and the relative positions between the distal ends <strong>of</strong> the catheters<br />

were measured and compared to manufacturer's stated values: 2 mm<br />

from central catheter to outer ring, and <strong>10</strong> mm from outer ring to<br />

inner ring.<br />

: The 3.5 cm SC could be used on only 22/29 fractions. The<br />

mean percent differences in HRCTV D90, and D2cc for bladder,<br />

rectum, sigmoid and bowel between the Capri, used as reference,r<br />

and SC were, respectively: 19%±14, 39%± 29, 59%±44, 58%±37, and<br />

41%±32 for TG43. Similar differences were found when ACUROS was<br />

used. For the Capri plans, the mean differences between TG43 and<br />

ACUROS for the same metrics were: 1.8%±0.5, 2.3%±0.6, 2.6%±0.6,<br />

3.5%±1.1, and 3.4%±1.5 The distal measurements ranged 2.0 to 7.0<br />

mm (avg 4.1 mm) from central catheter to outer ring, and 7.1 to <strong>10</strong>.2<br />

mm (avg 8.3 mm) from outer ring to inner ring.<br />

: The new CAPRI applicator has several advantages: 1)<br />

better dose coverage for asymmetric and deep (> 0.5 cm) targets; 2)<br />

better OARs sparing; 3) increased patient comfort and immobilization<br />

due conformity to the vaginal vault. For catheter identification<br />

purposes, it is important for the user to be aware <strong>of</strong> the differences<br />

between the manufacturer's stated relative positions <strong>of</strong> the catheters<br />

and individual production CAPRIs. Air in the balloon, when accounted<br />

for with ACUROS, impacts modestly on the dose metrics.<br />

PO354<br />

DOSIMETRIC IMPACTS OF UPGRADING FROM PLATO TO<br />

ONCENTRABRACHY IN A HIGH VOLUME PROSTATE HDR BRACHY<br />

THERAPY CENTER<br />

F. Lacroix 1 , J. Morrier 1 , M.C. Lavallée 1 , S. Aubin 1 , W. Foster 1 , A.G.<br />

Martin 1 , E. Vigneault 1 , N. Varfalvy 1 , L. Beaulieu 1<br />

1 CHUQ, Radiooncologie, Québec, Canada<br />

: To investigate the dosimetric impacts <strong>of</strong><br />

upgrading from Plato to OncentraBrachy for HDR prostate planning.<br />

: CHUQ is one <strong>of</strong> the highest volume prostate<br />

HDR brachytherapy centers in North America today. More than 800<br />

prostate cancer patients have been treated with an HDR<br />

brachytherapy boost at HôtelDieu de Québec (CHUQ) since 1999 and<br />

more than 200 in 2011 only.<br />

Our current procedure involves the insertion <strong>of</strong> 1617 flexible plastic<br />

needles using ultrasound guidance. Computed tomography imaging is<br />

used for contouring. Planning was performed using Plato (Nucletron,<br />

BV, The Netherlands) until june 1 2011 but is now performed using<br />

OncentraBrachy. Inverse planning simulated annealing optimization is<br />

used for all cases. 81 patients were accrued from January 1 2011 to<br />

June 1 2011 and treated with Plato and 1<strong>12</strong> patients were treated<br />

from June 15 2011 to November 8 2011 using Oncentra. In this period,<br />

there were no modifications in the implant procedure itself, to the<br />

prescription dose, the contouring methods, or in the personnel<br />

performing the implant. Student’s ttest was performed on relevant<br />

dosimetric indices <strong>of</strong> the distributions to determine whether the<br />

averages <strong>of</strong> the distributions were different between the two periods.<br />

An Ftest was also performed to determine whether the standard<br />

deviation <strong>of</strong> the distributions were significantly different. In addition,<br />

where differences where statistically significant (p


S144 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

PO357<br />

DOSIMETRIC IMPLICATIONS TO VAGINAL SURFACE DOSE OF PLANNING<br />

OPTIMIZATION METHODS<br />

A. Damato 1 , K. Townamchai 1 , A. Viswanathan 1<br />

1<br />

DanaFarber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital,<br />

Radiation Oncology, Boston, USA<br />

: Highdoserate vaginal cylinder (VC)<br />

brachytherapy is a widely used technique for the management <strong>of</strong><br />

postoperative endometrial cancer. Differences exist in prescription<br />

and optimization methodologies for VC brachytherapy. This is a<br />

dosimetric evaluation <strong>of</strong> two common VC brachytherapy optimization<br />

techniques.<br />

: Records <strong>of</strong> 15 postoperative endometrial<br />

cancer patients who recently received adjuvant VC brachytherapy in<br />

our clinic were retrospectively analyzed. For all patients, a dose <strong>of</strong> 4<br />

Gy per fraction was prescribed to the surface <strong>of</strong> the VC; 4 to 6<br />

fractions were administered. The CT scan <strong>of</strong> the first fraction was<br />

used to generate 2 3D plans: 1 with optimization dose points along the<br />

surface <strong>of</strong> the VC and tapered along the dome (TP), and 1 with dose<br />

points at a fixed distance from the cylinder center (NTP) equal to the<br />

cylinder radius. The dwell times were automatically optimized in the<br />

Oncentra Brachy Planning System so that average dose to the dose<br />

points was equal to 4 Gy. The source step size was 0.5 cm. Organs at<br />

risk (OARs) (i.e., bladder [BD], rectum [R], sigmoid [S] and bowel<br />

[BW]) were contoured when present in the CT scan and the D0.1cc<br />

and D2cc per fraction were calculated. Dose per fraction to the dome<br />

(DD) was calculated at the most superior dose point along the VC<br />

dome for both TP and NTP. Significance was evaluated with a paired<br />

student Ttest; pvalues


S146 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

segmentation <strong>of</strong> the target volume and <strong>of</strong> <strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OAR).<br />

Cornea, eye lens, sclera, papilla, optic nerve and lacrimal gland were<br />

considered.<br />

: In order to simulate an actual treatment it was assumed that<br />

the plaques in each <strong>of</strong> the positions were irradiating 4 mm height<br />

tumours. A dose <strong>of</strong> 700 Gy to the sclera was prescribed. As an<br />

example, the DVHs obtained for the papilla are presented in the<br />

figure. The lines from right to left correspond to CCA in posterior<br />

position, CCB equatorial, CCA equatorial and CCA anterior.<br />

<br />

: For the first time it has been possible to simulate an<br />

accurate geometry <strong>of</strong> an eye plaque inside the voxelised geometry <strong>of</strong><br />

a patient. This mixed quadric and voxelised geometry simulation<br />

approach, together with a segmented CT, allows calculating DVHs for<br />

relevant anatomical structures <strong>of</strong> the eye and the orbit obtaining<br />

unprecedented accurate information on absorbed dose applied to<br />

OARs. This is an important step for further optimization <strong>of</strong><br />

brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> ocular tumours.<br />

PO362<br />

QUALITY ASSURANCE OF TREATMENT PLANS IN HDR/PDR<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY. A METHOD OF VERIFYING CALCULATED TREATMENT<br />

TIMES<br />

A. With 1 , L. Karlsson 1<br />

1 Örebro University Hospital, Medical Physics, Örebro, Sweden<br />

: In brachytherapy there are many different<br />

treatment sites, e.g uterine cervix, head & neck and breast. For each<br />

afterloading technique there are variations in implant size, number <strong>of</strong><br />

catheters and type <strong>of</strong> applicators used, as well as the number <strong>of</strong><br />

active dwell positions. With every unique implant the configuration <strong>of</strong><br />

catheters varies; singlelayered, multilayered, different separations<br />

etc. Different optimization techniques such as geometrical and<br />

anatomical are available. There are also various ways <strong>of</strong><br />

normalization, choice <strong>of</strong> prescription points and different dose<br />

prescriptions. In a clinical situation, usually with little time between<br />

planning and delivery, estimation <strong>of</strong> the validity <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

treatment time given by the planning s<strong>of</strong>tware can prove difficult.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to develop a method for quick verification<br />

that the treatment time for an implant dose calculation is reasonable<br />

within ± 15% (2σ).<br />

: Material consisting <strong>of</strong> data from 395<br />

treatments, both HDR (150 uterine cervix) and PDR (45 lip, <strong>12</strong>5 base<br />

<strong>of</strong> tongue & 75 breast) were evaluated. All PDRimplants were<br />

performed with flexible plastic tubes and for the HDR treatments <strong>of</strong><br />

the uterine cervix the ring applicator with or without needles was<br />

used. The volume encompassed by the <strong>10</strong>0% isodose was analyzed<br />

together with the prescribed dose D (Gy), total radiation time T<br />

(seconds) and reference air kerma rate RAKR (mGy m 2 h 1 ) at the time<br />

<strong>of</strong> treatment. The data was normalized to 1 Gy and a RAKR <strong>of</strong> 40.7<br />

mGy m 2 h 1 . Parametric fits were applied to each group individually as<br />

well as a common fit for all the data. A nonlinear equation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

form f(x)=a x b was used in each case. Using the relations TRAK=a Vol b<br />

and TRAK=T RAKR/3600 we end up with the expression T=<br />

3600 a Vol b /RAKR relating treatment time with isodose volume.<br />

: Considering the common fit, approximately 95% (2σ) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

data points falls within ±11%. For the individual treatment sites, lip,<br />

base <strong>of</strong> tongue, breast and uterine cervix, the differences between<br />

individual fits and the common fit were negligible. The deviation from<br />

the common fit was ±<strong>12</strong>%, ±7%, ±14% and ±6% respectively. The R<br />

square values <strong>of</strong> the fits were 0.99 (all data) and 0.98, 0.99, 0.94,<br />

0.99 individually. The coefficients for the common fit were a=7.82 <strong>10</strong> <br />

4<br />

and b = 0.634 which yields the final <br />

T=114.5 Vol 0.634 D/RAKR.<br />

: For future HDR/PDR treatments, it is possible to verify<br />

the calculated treatment time within 15% (95% confidence level) using<br />

a parametric fit from earlier treatment data. The expression for the<br />

common fit can be used for all implants.<br />

<br />

PO363<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY IN THE HEAD AND NECK REGION USING INDIVIDUAL<br />

APPLICATORS A TECHNICAL NOTE<br />

M. Niewald 1 , S. Richard 1 , N. Licht 1 , M.H. Schneider 2 , K. Bumm 3 , J.<br />

Fleckenstein 1 , C. Ruebe 1<br />

1<br />

Saarland University Hospital, Dept. <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy and<br />

Radiooncology, Homburg/Saar, Germany<br />

2<br />

Epithetic Institute, Dept.Zweibrücken, Zweibruecken, Germany<br />

3<br />

Saarland University Hospital, Dept. <strong>of</strong> Otorhinolaryngology,<br />

Homburg/Saar, Germany<br />

: The dose that can be applied safely especially to<br />

the upper nose or the nasopharynx is <strong>of</strong>ten limited due to the<br />

tolerance <strong>of</strong> critical structures like eye, optic nerve or optic chiasm.<br />

Furthermore, air within the nose or the paranasal sinuses pr<strong>events</strong> an<br />

exact planning <strong>of</strong> dose distribution. Thus, we combined 3D or IMRT<br />

percutaneous radiotherapy with brachytherapy using individual<br />

applicators.<br />

: Impressions <strong>of</strong> the region to be irradiated are<br />

taken by a epithetician, if necessary under general anesthesia.<br />

Silicone applicators are formed from these impressions with the<br />

brachytherapy lines inserted in the predefined position .Usually after<br />

completion <strong>of</strong> percutaneous radiotherapy the applicators are inserted.<br />

The brachytherapy lines are marked by metal wires, a CT is<br />

performed, after identification <strong>of</strong> the lines and coutouring <strong>of</strong> the PTV<br />

the 3Disodose distribution is computed by the physicist (mainly<br />

Masterplan, Nucletron BV, Venendaal, The Netherlands). The tubes<br />

are connected to the radiotherapy device (mainly MicroSelectron,<br />

Nucletron BV, Venendaal, The Netherlands), radiotherapy is applied.<br />

Finally, the applicators are removed.<br />

: 15 patients have been treated using individual applicators.<br />

The target volume consisted <strong>of</strong> the nasopharyxnx in 7 patients, the<br />

nose in further 5, the remaining patients were treated for tumors <strong>of</strong><br />

the orbit (1), the paranasal sinuses (1) and the external ear (1). After<br />

a percutaneous radiotherapy <strong>of</strong> 5060Gy (single fractions <strong>of</strong> 2Gy) a<br />

brachytherapy dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> – 20Gy in 2 – 4 daily fractions to the isodose<br />

surrounding the PTV was applied.<br />

The applicators fitted well to the patients´ target regions. The 3D<br />

plan showed that the dose distribution could be easily tailored to the<br />

tumor localization and the patient´s individual anatomy so that a<br />

highquality implant could be achieved in all patients. The vast<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> the patients coped well with this therapy, the anesthetic<br />

procedures could be performed without problems. The costs for an<br />

applicator amount to € 800 – <strong>12</strong>00.<br />

: To our opinion this method is suitable for difficult<br />

brachytherapy applications to the head and neck region and may be<br />

superior to commercially available nasopharynx applicators.<br />

Nevertheless, we have to admit that the method is rather time<br />

consuming and costly.<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 147<br />

PO364<br />

FIRST EXPERIENCE WITH HIGHDOSE RATE INTERSTITIAL BRACHY<br />

THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF PENILE CARCINOMA<br />

J. Petera 1 , I. Sirak 1 , L. Kasaova 1 , P. Paluska 1<br />

1 Charles University Medical School and Teaching Hospital in Hradec<br />

Kralove, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Hradec Kralove, Czech<br />

Republic<br />

: Interstitial lowdose rate (LDR) brachytherapy<br />

allows a conservative treatment <strong>of</strong> T1T2 penile carcinoma. Highdose<br />

rate (HDR) brachytherapy is <strong>of</strong>ten considered as a dangerous method<br />

for interstitial implants because <strong>of</strong> higher risk <strong>of</strong> complications.<br />

However, numerous reports suggest that results <strong>of</strong> HDR brachytherapy<br />

may be comparable to LDR. We present our first experience with HDR<br />

brachytherapy in the treatment <strong>of</strong> penile cancer.<br />

: Thirteen patients with early penile carcinoma<br />

were treated by interstitial HDR brachytherapy at the dose <strong>of</strong> 18<br />

times 3 Gy twice daily between years 2002 and 2011. Breast<br />

interstitial brachytherapy template was used for fixation and precise<br />

geometry reconstruction <strong>of</strong> stainless hollow needles. Median follow up<br />

was 37 months (4.5 – 115).<br />

: Our brachytherapy technique and fractionation schedule was<br />

well tolerated by all patients. Acute reaction consisted predominantly<br />

<strong>of</strong> penis edema and grade 2 radiation mucositis which dissolved during<br />

8 weeks after the treatment. We didn’t observe any postradiation<br />

necrosis nor urethral stenosis. The worst late side effects recorded<br />

were mild telenagiectasias in the treatment region. The local control<br />

with brachytherapy was achieved in <strong>12</strong> patients, one patient recurred<br />

9 months after brachytherapy and was salvaged by partial<br />

amputation.<br />

: HDR interstitial brachytherapy with 18 times 3 Gy per<br />

fraction twice daily is a promising method in selected patients <strong>of</strong><br />

penile carcinoma and deserves further evaluation in a larger<br />

prospective study.<br />

PO365<br />

PHASE II STUDY: CTGUIDED INTERSTITIAL 60COHDRBRACHYTHERAPY<br />

WITH MRI FUSION FOR BOOST HEAD AND NECK PATIENTS<br />

A. Lozhkov 1 , T.M. Sharabura 1 , A.S. Aladin 2 , A.G. Zhumabaeva 3 , A.V.<br />

Turbina 1 , E.Y. Mozerova 1 , O.N. Davidova 1<br />

1<br />

Chelyabinsk Regional Oncol.Centre, Department for Radiotherapy<br />

and RadioOncology, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation<br />

2<br />

Chelyabinsk Regional Oncol.Centre, Department <strong>of</strong> Head and Neck<br />

Surgery, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation<br />

3<br />

Chelyabinsk Regional Oncol.Centre, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physic,<br />

Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation<br />

: To evaluate the efficacy and safety <strong>of</strong> CTguided<br />

interstitial 60CoHDR<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> with MRI fusion for boost head<br />

and neck patient.<br />

: In the period from February to August 20<strong>10</strong><br />

ten patients with squamous cell carcinoma <strong>of</strong> head and neck( I1, II4,<br />

III3, IV2) received external beam irradiation to the primary and the<br />

neck to a total dose <strong>of</strong> 50 Gy. After 3 4 weeks was carried out<br />

brachytherapy for boost. The brachytherapy dose <strong>of</strong> 24 Gy delivered<br />

in eight equal fractions BID to the primary site+1 cm. Definition <strong>of</strong><br />

GTV was carried out by fusion MRI with contrast done prior to the<br />

start <strong>of</strong> treatment and the CT with interstitial plastic needles.<br />

Insertion <strong>of</strong> plastic needles, using rules <strong>of</strong> the Paris system, but for<br />

planning, using inverse methods.<br />

: Locoregional tumor control at one years was 80%. For the<br />

entire group with one year diseasefree survival <strong>of</strong> 60%. 2 patients<br />

have recurrence after 6 and 9 months after treatment. Acute<br />

mucositis grade 3 had no place. Two patients underwent preventive<br />

tracheostomy<br />

: The use CTguided interstitial HDR<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> with<br />

MRI fusion improving the accuracy and safety <strong>of</strong> radiation treatment<br />

PO366<br />

HIGHDOSERATE INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY AS A MONOTHERAPY<br />

FOR ANTERIOR MOBILE TONGUE CANCER<br />

K. Yoshida 1 , T. Takenaka 2 , H. Akiyama 3 , H. Yamazaki 4 , M. Yoshida 5 , M.<br />

Kano 6 , H. Yamamoto 6 , T. Arika 6 , Y. Koretsune 7 , E. Tanaka 5<br />

1<br />

Osaka national Hospital, Radiation Oncology and Institute for Clinical<br />

Research, Osaka, Japan<br />

2<br />

Osaka National Hospital, Radiology, Osaka, Japan<br />

3<br />

Osaka Dental University, Oral Radiology, Osaka, Japan<br />

4<br />

Kyoto Prefectural University <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Radiology, Kyoto, Japan<br />

5<br />

Osaka National Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Osaka, Japan<br />

6<br />

Osaka National Hospital, Oral Surgery, Osaka, Japan<br />

7<br />

Osaka National Hospital, Institute for Clinical Research, Osaka,<br />

Japan<br />

: We had been used treatment doses <strong>of</strong> 60 Gy in <strong>10</strong><br />

fractions for highdoserate interstitial <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> (HDRISBT) as a<br />

monotherapy for anterior mobile tongue cancer previously. However,<br />

to reduce the treatment duration, we started to use the treatment<br />

doses <strong>of</strong> 54 Gy in 9 fractions in 2001. In this study, we investigated<br />

the feasibility <strong>of</strong> this dosefractionation schedule.<br />

: During eight years (200<strong>12</strong>009), eighteen<br />

N0M0 anterior mobile tongue cancer patients were enrolled at<br />

National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital. The median<br />

age <strong>of</strong> the patients was 61 years (range; 3484 years) and median<br />

followup time was 61 months (range; 21116 months). Using the UICC<br />

classification 2002, 3 patients were classified as T1, 11 patients as T2<br />

and 4 patients as T3. We implanted treatment applicators with the<br />

assistance lugol’s iodine staining and metal marker implantation for<br />

superficial lesion and intraoral ultrasonography for deep lesion.<br />

Treatment plans were optimized using metal marker and computed<br />

tomography as needed, and total treatment doses were 54 Gy in 9<br />

fraction.<br />

: The 2 and 5year local control rates were both 82%,<br />

respectively. The 2year local control rates were <strong>10</strong>0%, 72% and <strong>10</strong>0%<br />

for T1, T2 and T3. Technical error was suspected as a cause <strong>of</strong> local<br />

recurrence for two <strong>of</strong> three patients. One was inadequate shielding by<br />

leadblock and the other was tongue edema during implantation. The<br />

2 and 5year causespecific survival rates were 83% and 74%. The 2<br />

year causespecific survival rates were 67%, 90% and 75% for T1, T2<br />

and T3. Acute severe complication was aspiration <strong>of</strong> sputum that was


S148 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

necessary to be managed by respirator transiently for one patient.<br />

Five patients (28%) showed s<strong>of</strong>t tissue necrosis or mandible<br />

complication as moderate to severe late severe complication. One <strong>of</strong><br />

5 patients received partial sequestrectomy and the other symptoms<br />

were improved by drug and/or hyperbaric oxygen.<br />

: Our treatment result <strong>of</strong> HDRISBT as a monotherapy <strong>of</strong><br />

54 Gy in 9 fractions for anterior mobile tongue cancer is feasible.<br />

Technical improvement should be investigated to prevent local<br />

recurrence by technical error.<br />

PO367<br />

THE DIFFERENT BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF SINGLE, FRACTIONED AND<br />

CLDR IRRADIATION IN CL187 COLORECTAL CANCER CELLS<br />

H. Wang 1 , J. Wang 1<br />

1 Peking University Third Hospital, Cancer Center, Beijing, China<br />

: To identify the different effectiveness <strong>of</strong> single,<br />

fractioned and continuous low dose rate irradiation on the human<br />

colorectal cancer cell line CL187 in vitro and explore the relevant<br />

molecular mechanisms.<br />

: The CL187 cells were exposed to radiation <strong>of</strong><br />

6 MV Xray at high dose rate <strong>of</strong> 4Gy/min and <strong>12</strong>5 I seed at low dose rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2.77 cGy/h. There were three groups: single dose radiation group<br />

(SDR), fractioned dose radiation group (FDR) by 2Gy/f and continuous<br />

low dose rate radiation group (CLDR). The radiation doses were 0, 2, 4<br />

and 8Gy, respectively. Radiation responses to radiation <strong>of</strong> tumor cells<br />

were evaluated by colonyforming assay. Cell cycle arrests were<br />

detected by flow cytometry after propidium iodide (PI) staining.<br />

Apoptosis was detected by Annexin and PI staining. The expressions <strong>of</strong><br />

DNAPKcs, Ku70 and Ku80 were determined by Western blotting.<br />

: The relative biological effect (RBE) for <strong>12</strong>5 I seeds compared<br />

with 6 MV Xray was 1.41. At 48h after 0, 2, 4 and 8 Gy irradiation,<br />

the percentage <strong>of</strong> G2/M phase <strong>of</strong> CLDR group were 4.92±0.02%,<br />

13.67±1.67%, 16.41±2.19% and 23.81±1.61%, respectively. Irradiated<br />

by 4Gy, the percentage <strong>of</strong> the G2/M phase cell cycle arrest <strong>of</strong> CLDR<br />

group increased significantly(CLDR vs. SDR, t=6.03, p=0.026; CLDR vs.<br />

FDR, t=13.98, p=0.005). After 0, 2, 4 and 8 Gy irradiation, early<br />

apoptosis rates <strong>of</strong> CLDR group at 48h were 1.28±0.25%, 1.87±0.06%,<br />

6.54±0.88% and 7.62±0.39%, respectively. The percentage <strong>of</strong> early<br />

apoptosis <strong>of</strong> 4Gy in CLDR group increased significantly(CLDR vs. SDR,<br />

t=31.22, p=0.001; CLDR vs. FDR, t=7.01, p=0.02). At 48h after 0, 2, 4<br />

and 8 Gy irradiation, late apoptosis rates <strong>of</strong> CLDR group were<br />

1.19±0.05%, 7.86±0.08%, 9.72±0.85% and 5.76±0.63%, respectively.<br />

The percentage <strong>of</strong> late apoptosis <strong>of</strong> 4Gy in CLDR group increased<br />

significantly(CLDR vs. SDR, t=15.08, p=0.004; CLDR vs. FDR, t=11.99,<br />

p=0.007). DNAPKcs and Ku70 expression level <strong>of</strong> CLDR group<br />

decreased compared with SDR and FDR groups.<br />

: <strong>12</strong>5 I seeds continuous low dose rate irradiation showed<br />

more effective inhibition than that <strong>of</strong> 6 MV Xray high dose rate<br />

irradiation on CL187 cells. Apoptosis and G2/M phase cell cycle arrest<br />

were the main mechanism <strong>of</strong> cellkilling effects under low dose rate<br />

irradiation. <strong>12</strong>5 I seeds continuous low dose rate irradiation could<br />

influence the DNA repair <strong>of</strong> cells via DNAPKcs and Ku70 pathways.<br />

PO368<br />

ULTRASOUNDGUIDED PERCUTANEOUS IODINE<strong>12</strong>5 SEED IMPLANTATION<br />

FOR TREATING LIVER MALIGNANCIES<br />

S.Q. Ttian 1 , J.J. Wang 1 , Y.L. Jiang 1 , W.J. Jiang 1 , P. Jiang 1 , W.Q. Ran 1 ,<br />

N. Meng 1<br />

1<br />

Peking University Third Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology<br />

Cancer Center, Beijing, China<br />

: To investigate the therapeutic efficacy <strong>of</strong><br />

ultrasoundguided <strong>12</strong>5 I seed implantation for treatment <strong>of</strong> liver cancer.<br />

: A total <strong>of</strong> 18 patients (84 male, 13 female;<br />

mean age 53.4 years, range 24–74 years) with liver cancer were<br />

included in this study. The diagnosis <strong>of</strong> each case was verified by CT,<br />

MRI and biopsy. A median number <strong>of</strong> 28 <strong>12</strong>5 I seeds (rang, 856) per<br />

patient were implanted into liver cancer by ultrasoundguided needle<br />

puncture. The specific activity <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>5 I ranged from 0.60 to 0.80 mCi per<br />

seed and the median D90 was <strong>12</strong>0 Gy (rang, 90140 Gy). Patients were<br />

followedup by examination and by contrastenhanced computed<br />

tomography (CT) to evaluate treatment responses. Survival was<br />

analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method.<br />

: During a median followup period was 24 months (range: 4–<br />

37months), the response rate <strong>of</strong> tumor was 83.0%. Overall median<br />

control time was 11.0 months (95% CI, 8.4–14.3). The local control<br />

rate was 59.9% at 1 year and 20.5% at 2 years. The overall median<br />

survival was 15 months (95% CI, 9.6–20.3), while the overall 1, 2 year<br />

survival rates were 61.9%, 27.1%, respectively. No serious<br />

complications were observed postoperatively and during the followup<br />

period<br />

<strong>12</strong>5<br />

: Ultrasoundguided brachytherapy using I seed<br />

implantation was a safe and effective therapeutic technique for<br />

treating liver cancer.<br />

PO369<br />

COMPARISON OF 60 GY AND 54 GY IN HIGHDOSERATE INTERSTITIAL<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY FOR EARLY ORAL TONGUE CANCER<br />

H. Akiyama 1 , K. Yoshida 2 , K. Shimizutani 1 , H. Yamazaki 3 , M. Koizumi 4 ,<br />

Y. Yoshioka 4 , N. Kakimoto 5 , S. Murakami 5 , S. Furukawa 5 , K. Ogawa 4<br />

1<br />

Osaka Dental University, Department <strong>of</strong> Oral Radiology, Osaka,<br />

Japan<br />

2<br />

National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Osaka, Japan<br />

3<br />

Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Medical Science Kyoto Prefectural University <strong>of</strong><br />

Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology, Kyoto, Japan<br />

4<br />

Osaka University Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Radiation Oncology, Osaka, Japan<br />

5<br />

Osaka University Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Densitry, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

MaxilloFacial Radiology, Osaka, Japan<br />

: To compare the results between total dose 60<br />

Gy/ <strong>10</strong> fractions (bid) and 54 Gy/ 9 fractions <strong>of</strong> Highdoserate<br />

interstitial brachytherapy (HDRISBT) for early oral tongue cancer.<br />

: We made a matchedpair analysis <strong>of</strong> early<br />

oral tongue cancer (T<strong>12</strong>N0M0) patient treated by 60 Gy and 54Gy<br />

between 1996 and 2004 at Osaka University Hospital. 17 patients<br />

treated by 54Gy and 34 matched pair control arm treated by 60Gy<br />

were extracted and analyzed.<br />

: Local recurrence occurred in two patients treated with 54 Gy<br />

arm and five in 60 Gy arm. Two and 5year local control rates were<br />

both 88% for 54 Gy arm and 88% and 84% for 60Gy arm (n.s.). Nodal<br />

metastases occurred in 13 and 9 patients for 60 Gy and 54 Gy arms<br />

Fiveyear overall survival rates <strong>of</strong> 60 Gy and 54 Gy arm were 84% and<br />

66%, respectively. One and 2year actuarial complication free rates in<br />

the 60 Gy arm were 97 and 91%, respectively, and those in the 54 Gy<br />

arm was both 83% (n.s.). There were no significant associations<br />

between the total dose and local control rate and late complications.<br />

: A dose <strong>of</strong> 54 Gy in 9 fractions showed compatible<br />

outcome to 60 Gy/ <strong>10</strong> fractions for early oral tongue cancer.<br />

PO370<br />

PERCUTANEOUS ULTRASOUNDGUIDED IODINE<strong>12</strong>5 IMPLANTATION AS A<br />

SALVAGE THERAPY FOR RECURRENT LYMPH NODE METASTASES<br />

J.J. Wang 1 , L.E.I. Lin 1 , Y. Jiang 1 , N.A. Meng 1 , W. Ran 1 , S. Tian 1 , R.<br />

Yang 1 , Y.A.N. Yu 2<br />

1<br />

Peking University Third Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Beijing, China<br />

2<br />

Thomas Jefferson University, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Beijing, USA<br />

: Esophageal cancer is generally associated with a<br />

poor prognosis, particularly in the recurrent cervical lymph node<br />

metastases after radial therapy. This study aimed to assess the<br />

efficacy and feasibility <strong>of</strong> percutaneous <strong>12</strong>5 I seed implantation for the<br />

management <strong>of</strong> recurrent lymph node metastases in esophageal<br />

carcinoma.<br />

: 27 lesions in 16 patients with cervical lymph<br />

node metastases who had undergone ultrasoundguided <strong>12</strong>5 I seed<br />

implantation were reviewed. The local control and survival rates were<br />

evaluated by the KaplanMeier method<br />

: Prior to seed implantation, all patients had undergone<br />

surgery, EBRT with/without chemotherapy: one patient had previously<br />

undergone cervical lymph nodes dissection and EBRT twice; two<br />

patients had undergone surgery once; 13 patients had received EBRT<br />

(9 patients received EBRT once, 4 received EBRT twice). The total<br />

cumulative doses <strong>of</strong> EBRT were 47143 Gy, with a median <strong>of</strong> 64 Gy.<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 149<br />

Four patients had received 13 cycles <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy, with a median<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1 cycle. The activity <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>5 I seeds implanted ranged from 0.5 mCi to<br />

0.8 mCi (median: 0.69 mCi). The total number <strong>of</strong> seeds implanted<br />

ranged from 9 to 84 (median: 27). The actuarial D90 ranged from 142<br />

Gy to 218 Gy (median: 218 Gy). The median time <strong>of</strong> local diseasefree<br />

progression was 7 months (95% CI, 3.3 – <strong>10</strong>.7), and the 1 and 2year<br />

local control rates were 20.1% and 13.4%, respectively. The 1 and 2<br />

year survival rates were 20.6% and 13.8%, respectively (median: 7<br />

months; 95% CI, 3.3 – <strong>10</strong>.7). In the patients with two or more lymph<br />

nodes metastases, seven <strong>of</strong> the nine (78%) patients survived no more<br />

than <strong>10</strong> months. Four <strong>of</strong> seven (57%) patients who had single lymph<br />

node metastases lived longer than <strong>10</strong> months. Of the 16 original<br />

patients, one was still alive at the time <strong>of</strong> data analysis. The other<br />

patients had died from cancerrelated cachexia (n = 8, 50%),<br />

pneumonia (n = 3), the primary tumor (n = 3), and heart disease (n =<br />

1). One patient experienced a grade I skin reaction. Treatment<br />

related blood vessel damage and neuropathy were not observed.<br />

: In esophageal carcinoma patients with recurrent cervical<br />

lymph node metastases after radical therapy, treatment with<br />

permanent percutaneous <strong>12</strong>5 I seed implant is an alternative salvage<br />

treatment, which appears to be effective and welltolerated.<br />

PO371<br />

IMAGEGUIDED IODINE<strong>12</strong>5 PERMANENT IMPLANTATION AS SALVAGE<br />

THERAPY FOR RECURRENT HEAD AND NECK CARCINOMA<br />

J. Wang 1 , L. Zhu 1 , Y. Jiang 1 , N.A. Meng 1 , W. Ran 1 , H. Yuan 1 , C.H.E.N.<br />

Liu 1 , A.N.G. Qu 1 , R. Yang 1<br />

1<br />

Peking University Third Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Beijing, China<br />

: To preliminarily assess the feasibility, efficacy,<br />

and morbidity <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>5 I seed implantation under imageguidance for<br />

recurrent head and neck carcinoma after both surgery and external<br />

beam radiotherapy.<br />

: Nineteen patients with recurrent head and<br />

neck carcinomas underwent <strong>12</strong>5 I seed implantation under ultrasound or<br />

ComputedTomography (CT) guidance. The actuarial D90 <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>5 I seed<br />

implantation ranged from 90 to 160 Gy (median, 131 Gy). The follow<br />

up ranged from 3 to 44 months (median, 11 months).<br />

: The median local control was 24 months (95%CI, <strong>10</strong>.2–37.8).<br />

The 1 year 2 year and 3 year local controls were 73.3%, 27.5% and<br />

27.5%, respectively, whereas the 1 year, 2 year and 3 year<br />

survival rates were 53.0%, 18.2% and 18.2%, respectively, and the<br />

median survival was 13 months (95% CI, 6.6–19.4). 26.3% <strong>of</strong> patients<br />

(5/19) died <strong>of</strong> local recurrence and 21.1% <strong>of</strong> patients (4/19) died <strong>of</strong><br />

metastases. No bone, s<strong>of</strong>t tissue necrosis and carotid artery damages<br />

were noted.<br />

: <strong>12</strong>5 I seed implantation is feasible and safe as a salvage<br />

treatment for patients with recurrent head and neck cancers. The<br />

high local control results and low morbidity merits further<br />

investigation.<br />

PO372<br />

EVALUATION OF BIODEGRADABLE MAGNESIUM ALLOY AZ31 AS A NEW<br />

CONNECTING MATERIAL FOR IODINE<strong>12</strong>5 BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

Z. Fu Jun 1<br />

1<br />

Sun Yatsen University Cancer Center, Department <strong>of</strong> Imaging and<br />

Interventional Radiology, Guangzhou, China<br />

: To evaluate the in vivo degradation<br />

characteristics and tissue compatibility <strong>of</strong> new I <strong>12</strong>5 seed chains<br />

connected with the biodegradable magnesium alloy AZ31 in New<br />

Zealand rabbits.<br />

: Thirty New Zealand rabbits were randomly<br />

divided into three groups. In group A, magnesium alloy radioactive I <strong>12</strong>5<br />

seed chains were implanted into VX2 tumors; in group B, magnesium<br />

alloy nonradioactive I <strong>12</strong>5 seed chains were implanted into normal<br />

muscle; group C served as an untreated control group. The mass loss<br />

<strong>of</strong> the AZ31 magnesium alloy connecting material was measured in the<br />

two groups at different time points after implantation <strong>of</strong> the I <strong>12</strong>5 seed<br />

chains. Morphological and histological changes at the implantation<br />

site and in <strong>org</strong>ans were monitored using light microscopy, and seed<br />

displacement was assessed using regular Xray and computed<br />

tomography (CT) scanning. Blood and urine samples were collected<br />

from all experimental animals to measure changes in magnesium ion<br />

concentrations.<br />

: The new I <strong>12</strong>5 seed chains made with AZ31 magnesium alloy<br />

began to degrade during the first week after implantation. On day 21,<br />

the degradation rate was 81% in muscle tissue and 83% in tumor<br />

tissue; these degradation rates are not statistically significant. Shortly<br />

after implantation, a mild local inflammatory response and gas<br />

production were induced; the gas disappeared 21 days after<br />

implantation. Blood magnesium ion concentrations after implantation<br />

were relatively stable, but urine magnesium concentrations increased<br />

and fluctuated over a larger range. Pathological inspection <strong>of</strong> the<br />

liver, kidney, heart, and spleen <strong>of</strong> all animals implanted with I <strong>12</strong>5 seed<br />

chains revealed no significant abnormalities. At 7 days after the<br />

implantation <strong>of</strong> magnesium alloy radioactive I <strong>12</strong>5 seed chains into<br />

tumors, the connecting material showed good connecting and fixing<br />

function. At 21 days after implantation, the seeds had separated from<br />

each other, displacement had occurred, and the radioactive seeds had<br />

aggregated in concordance with tumor shrinkage.<br />

: Iodine<strong>12</strong>5 seed implants connected with AZ31<br />

magnesium alloy have rapid degradation characteristics and good<br />

biocompatibility when implanted into rabbits,the results suggest that<br />

magnesium alloy AZ31 might be a potential and attractive connecting<br />

material for permanently iodine<strong>12</strong>5 brachytherapy.<br />

PO373<br />

HDR BRACHYTHERAPY BOOST FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED RECTAL<br />

CARCINOMA FOLLOWING EBCRTCLATTERBRIDGE EXPERIENCE<br />

A. Sun Myint 1 , A. Montazeri 1 , F. Jelly 1 , M. Snee 1 , H. Wong 1<br />

1<br />

Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology, Clinical Oncology, Bebington<br />

Merseyside, United Kingdom<br />

: Preop chemoradiotherapy is now standard <strong>of</strong><br />

care for the locally advanced rectal carcinomas with threatened CRM.<br />

Clear resection margin is not always possible and advanced surgical<br />

techniques have to be used with increase morbidity and mortality. We<br />

present our experience on patients treated at brachytherapy unit in<br />

Clatterbridge.<br />

: From Jan 2003Dec 20<strong>10</strong>, patients with<br />

locally advanced low rectal cancer were treated with preoperative<br />

chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using 45Gy /25#/5 weeks with oral<br />

capecitabine (MonFri) during RT. A total <strong>of</strong> 53 patients <strong>of</strong> whom 42<br />

(79.2%) were males. Median age was 65 years (range3983). Preop<br />

MRI staging was mandatory. Stages were T3 = 43 (81.1%), T4= 6<br />

(11.3%) others 4 (7.5%) . HDR rectal brachytherapy was carried out<br />

within 24 weeks after completion <strong>of</strong> CRT using OncoSmart multi<br />

channel applicator delivering <strong>10</strong>Gy at <strong>10</strong>mm from the surface <strong>of</strong> the<br />

applicator. Restaging MRI scan was carried out at 4 weeks (8wks from<br />

CRT). Surgery was carried out 46 weeks later.<br />

: Only patients proceeded to surgery were analysed. Median<br />

follow up was 18 months (range 0.0370). Type <strong>of</strong> surgery were APR<br />

35(66%), and AR 17(32.1%). Only one patient had palliative resection.<br />

Complete resection (R0) was achieved in 45(84.9%), R1 in 8 pts<br />

(15.1%). Significant down staging occurred in 19 pts (35.8%) out <strong>of</strong><br />

which <strong>12</strong> (22.6%) has no residual tumour. Thirty three patients with<br />

either N1 19(35.8%) or N2 14 (26.4%) were down staged to no residual<br />

tumour (N0) in the lymph nodes. There was only one patient initially<br />

staged N0 has evidence <strong>of</strong> disease (N1). No significant increased in<br />

surgical morbidity was encountered (detailed surgical paper to<br />

follow).<br />

: HDR brachytherapy can be <strong>of</strong>fered to locally advance<br />

rectal cancer following preop CRT. This could down staged the<br />

tumour further and improve R0 resection rate which reduces the<br />

chance <strong>of</strong> relapse at a later date. Those patients who achieved down<br />

staging can be identified with MRI restaging scans. After MDT<br />

discussion, major surgery can be avoided in those patients suitable for<br />

watch policy to reduce morbidity and mortality especially in elderly<br />

and those with increased surgical risk.


S150 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

PO374<br />

PROSPECTIVE DOSEESCALADE STUDY OF ADJUVANT HIGHDOSERATE<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY FOR SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS<br />

G. Kacso 1 , L. Florea 2 , D. Eniu 3<br />

1<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. I. Chiricuta, <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Cluj<br />

Napoca, Romania<br />

2<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. I. Chiricuta, Medical Oncology, Cluj<br />

Napoca, Romania<br />

3<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. I. Chiricuta, Surgery, Cluj Napoca,<br />

Romania<br />

: Prospective nonrandomized doseescalade study<br />

<strong>of</strong> adjuvant highdoserate brachytherapy (HDR BT) for completely<br />

resected high grade s<strong>of</strong>t tissues sarcomas <strong>of</strong> extremities or superficial<br />

trunk (STRESs)<br />

: From November 2004 to February 2008, 15<br />

patients with nonmetastatic pT<strong>12</strong>R0 G23 STRESs consented to<br />

participate and were given adjuvant Iridium 192 HDRBT on 3 dose<br />

levels: <strong>12</strong> fractions <strong>of</strong> 3 Gy, bid (regimen A), 14 fractions <strong>of</strong> 3 Gy, bid<br />

(B) and <strong>12</strong> fractions <strong>of</strong> 3.5Gy, bid (C). Prior stratification according to<br />

the topography (upper vs. lower limb vs. trunk) and to the size (< 5cm<br />

vs. 5<strong>10</strong> cm vs. ><strong>10</strong> cm) ensured equal distribution between dose<br />

subgroups. Single plan equidistant catheters (stainless needles or<br />

plastic tubes depending on the anatomy) were implanted per<br />

operatively, with BT starting no sooner than the fifth day after the Ro<br />

resection. The dose was prescribed at 1 cm from the cathethers axis.<br />

Nine patients (60%) received also adjuvant chemotherapy. BT toxicity<br />

was assessed on the CTC3.0 scale, whereas efficacy by local control or<br />

histological proven local recurrence.<br />

: The local treatment (surgery + BT) was delivered between 11<br />

and 20 days (mean 14.5 days). With a median followup <strong>of</strong> 46 months<br />

(13 to 84 months), the local failure was 40% (2 patients) vs. 20 % (1<br />

patient) vs. none in C vs. B vs. A subgroup. One single acute wound<br />

dehiscence and one other severe late toxicity (subcutaneous fibrosis)<br />

was noticed in the 14frx 3Gy group and in the 3.5Gy/fr dose level,<br />

respectively. The ≤ G2 late toxicity (skin, neurologic and/or functional<br />

impairment) was recorded more frequently in the high dose arms (B &<br />

C).<br />

: For this STRESs group <strong>of</strong> patients, there seems no<br />

benefit <strong>of</strong> dose escalade with adjuvant HDR BT from 3 Gy to 3.5 Gy/fr<br />

or from <strong>12</strong> fr to 14 fr bid. In our study, the <strong>12</strong>fr x 3 Gy bid regimen<br />

<strong>of</strong>fers the best therapeutic index, with <strong>10</strong>0% local control and no<br />

severe toxicity at almost 4 years median followup. The short overall<br />

treatment time favours BT as compared to external beam<br />

radiotherapy.<br />

PO375<br />

THE CLINICAL VALUE AND SAFETY OF TRANSSUPERIOR VENA CAVA<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY FOR METASTATIC MEDIASTINAL LYMPH NODES<br />

Y. Li 1 , B. Liu 1 , Y. Wang 1 , W. Wang 1 , Z. Li 1 , X. Song 1<br />

1<br />

Second Hospital <strong>of</strong> Shandong University, Interventional therapy,<br />

Jinan, China<br />

: To investigate the clinical value and safety <strong>of</strong><br />

trans superior vena cava brachytherapy in treating metastatic lymph<br />

nodes <strong>of</strong> mediastinum under CTguidance.<br />

: From November 2009 to January 2011, 15<br />

patients with 27 metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes received <strong>12</strong>5 I<br />

brachytherapy.The diameter <strong>of</strong> these lymph nodes ranged from 1.0 to<br />

4.0cm. The diameter <strong>of</strong> these metastatic lymph nodes ranged from<br />

1.0 to 4.0cm; 15(55.56%) <strong>of</strong> them with diameter <strong>of</strong>T>0.01 day.<br />

BEDVHs were generated for all ROIs using these T values and<br />

correspondingly reduced prescription doses. Objective functions were<br />

created to evaluate the BEDVHs as a function <strong>of</strong> both implant duration<br />

vs. T=7 and radionuclide selection vs. R= <strong>12</strong>5 I.<br />

: Reducing T from 7 to 0.01 day for a <strong>10</strong> mm plaque produced<br />

a BED benefit <strong>of</strong> 26%, 20%, and 17% for <strong>10</strong>3 Pd, <strong>12</strong>5 I, and 131 Cs,<br />

respectively, across all treatment positions considered. Results were<br />

somewhat positiondependent for the larger plaques. For all positions,<br />

T, and plaque sizes, we calculated a 16%35% BED benefit for <strong>10</strong>3 Pd vs.<br />

<strong>12</strong>5 131 <strong>12</strong>5<br />

I and a 3%7% BED detriment for Cs vs. I. Additionally, the<br />

corresponding OAR physical doses were lowest for <strong>10</strong>3 Pd under all<br />

circumstances.<br />

: Shorter implant durations may correlate with more<br />

favorable outcomes compared to 7 day implants when treating small<br />

or medium intraocular lesions. Results also indicate that implant<br />

duration may be safely reduced if the prescription physical dose is<br />

<strong>10</strong>3<br />

appropriately diminished, and that Pd <strong>of</strong>fers a substantial<br />

radiobiological benefit over <strong>12</strong>5 I and 131 Cs irrespective <strong>of</strong> plaque<br />

position, implant duration, and tumor size.<br />

PO379<br />

ENDOLUMINAL HIGH DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY FOR EARLY STAGE<br />

AND RECURRENT ESOPHAGEAL CANCER<br />

M.R. Folkert 1 , G.N. Cohen 2 , A.J. Wu 1 , H. Gerdes 3 , M.A. Schattner 3 , E.<br />

Ludwig 3 , D.H. Ilson 4 , K.A. Goodman 1<br />

1<br />

Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, New<br />

York NY, USA<br />

2<br />

Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Medical Physics, New York<br />

NY, USA<br />

3<br />

Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Gastroenterology, New<br />

York NY, USA<br />

4<br />

Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Medical Oncology, New<br />

York NY, USA<br />

: The management <strong>of</strong> locally recurrent esophageal<br />

cancer (EC) after definitive chemoradiotherapy or early stage EC in<br />

patients who are poor surgical candidates is complex. Endoluminal<br />

highdoserate (HDR) brachytherapy utilizing a wide range <strong>of</strong><br />

techniques and dosing regimens has been used with mixed results in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> toxicity and local control. In this study we examine the<br />

outcomes and toxicities in early stage and locally recurrent EC<br />

patients treated with a consistent HDR technique.<br />

: Between 8/2008 and 7/2011, 14 patients with<br />

EC were treated with HDR intraluminal brachytherapy, <strong>10</strong> (71.4%) with<br />

recurrent disease after chemoradiotherapy and 4 (28.6%) with<br />

previously unirradiated lesions. <strong>12</strong> (85.7%) patients had<br />

adenocarcinoma and 2 (14.3%) had squamous cell carcinoma. Of the<br />

previously treated patients, median dose <strong>of</strong> prior radiotherapy was<br />

5040 cGy (range 45005600 cGy). HDR treatments were performed<br />

under general anesthesia in conjunction with a gastroenterologist. At<br />

the time <strong>of</strong> the procedure, tumor extent was defined endoscopically<br />

and radioopaque markers were placed on the skin surface to<br />

demarcate the proximal and distal tumor and facilitate catheter<br />

positioning. Treatments were delivered in 3 fractions over 3 weeks to<br />

a median dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>00 cGy (range <strong>10</strong>001500 cGy); dose was<br />

prescribed to a median depth <strong>of</strong> 7mm (range 4<strong>10</strong>mm) with mucosal<br />

surface dose limited to 800<strong>10</strong>00 cGy. 6 (42.9%) patients also received<br />

concurrent chemotherapy (capecitabine, <strong>10</strong>00 mg BID) during the 3<br />

week course <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy. Patients were followed with serial<br />

imaging and esophagoscopy every 23 months.<br />

: Overall median followup was 9.7 months; 1 year local<br />

progressionfree (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 48.8% (95% CI:<br />

22.375.9%) and 88.9% (95% CI: 58.298.8%) respectively. For patients<br />

with recurrent disease, median followup was 6.7 months; 1 year PFS<br />

and OS were 32.4% (95% CI: 8.668.3%) and 80% (95% CI: 42.296.9%)<br />

respectively. For patients with previously unirradiated disease,<br />

median followup was 21.9 months; 1 year PFS and OS were 75.0% (95%<br />

CI: 21.998.7%) and <strong>10</strong>0.0% (95% CI: 39.6<strong>10</strong>0.0%) respectively. 1<br />

patient (7.1%) with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma developed<br />

distant metastases 8.5 months after treatment. 8 <strong>of</strong> 14 (57.1%)<br />

patients had Grade 1 acute adverse effects; 6 <strong>of</strong> 14 (42.9%) patients<br />

had chronic Grade 1 adverse effects; 2 <strong>of</strong> 14 (14.3%) patients<br />

developed Grade 1 strictures noted on endoscopy (both with recurrent<br />

disease). There were no Grade 2 or higher complications.<br />

: HDR brachytherapy with or without concurrent<br />

chemotherapy is a safe and welltolerated treatment for both early<br />

stage, previously untreated and recurrent EC. Given the high rate <strong>of</strong><br />

local recurrence and minimal toxicity in these patients, we are<br />

planning a prospective dose escalation trial for recurrent EC to<br />

determine the optimal brachytherapy regimen.<br />

PO380<br />

THE “CLAWS” : A GOLD APPLICATOR LOADED WITH I<strong>12</strong>5 SEEDS FOR<br />

LOCALIZED WHOLE EYE RADIOTHERAPY<br />

C.J. Trauernicht 1 , G.J. Maree 1 , E.R. Hering 1 , F.C.P. Du Plessis 2 , C.<br />

Stannard 3 , K. Lecuona 4 , R. Munro 1 , S. Tovey 1<br />

1<br />

Groote Schuur Hospital, Medical Physics, Cape Town, South Africa<br />

2<br />

University <strong>of</strong> the Free State, Medical Physics, Bloemfontein, South<br />

Africa<br />

3<br />

Groote Schuur Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Cape Town, South<br />

Africa<br />

4<br />

Groote Schuur Hospital, Ophthalmology, Cape Town, South Africa<br />

: This applicator (Fig. 1) is a specially designed<br />

gold applicator which is loaded with I<strong>12</strong>5 seeds. The applicator is<br />

used to mainly treat children with retinoblastoma, who require whole<br />

eye radiotherapy.<br />

: Under general anaesthesia, a pericorneal ring<br />

is attached to the 4 extraocular muscles, and 4 appendages, each<br />

loaded with I<strong>12</strong>5 seeds, are inserted beneath the conjunctiva in<br />

between each pair <strong>of</strong> muscles and attached anteriorly to the ring. The<br />

applicator has an inside diameter <strong>of</strong> 22 mm.


S152 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Fig 1: The 'Claws'<br />

: The applicator irradiates the eye with minimal dose to the<br />

surrounding bony orbit, extraocular optic nerve, eyelids and lacrimal<br />

gland. Certain seeds may be omitted to reduce the dose to the<br />

unaffected parts <strong>of</strong> the eye. A typical treatment prescription is 40 Gy<br />

given over 4 days to the centre <strong>of</strong> the eye. General anaesthesia is also<br />

required for the removal <strong>of</strong> the applicator.<br />

55 eyes in 49 patients were treated from 1987 – 2006. According to<br />

the Intraocular Group Classification <strong>of</strong> Stage 0 cancers, there were 9<br />

group B, 4 group C, 38 group D and 4 group E patients. 19 patients<br />

were treated with ≤ 34 Gy, 36 received ≥ 35 Gy. The median followup<br />

was 33 months, the range 2 – 205 months. Tumour control was<br />

achieved in 35 out <strong>of</strong> 55 patients (64 %) (groups B / C: 85 %; group D:<br />

58 %), the eye survived in 26 out <strong>of</strong> 55 patients (47 %) (groups B / C:<br />

85 %, group D: 39 %) and vision was retained in 23 out <strong>of</strong> 55 patients<br />

(42 %) (groups C / D: 85 %; group D: 32 %).<br />

: There is good local control for groups B and C. Local<br />

control in group D is improved with chemotherapy. Cosmesis is<br />

excellent.<br />

The applicators are costeffective because they can be reused, and<br />

the I<strong>12</strong>5 seeds are regularly used for other eye plaques and implants.<br />

A current project is underway to do the dose calculations using Monte<br />

Carlo simulations.<br />

PO381<br />

PREDICTIVE MODEL OF COMPLICATIONS AFTER PERIOPERATIVE HIGH<br />

DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

I. San Miguel 1 , M. RodriguezRuiz 2 , A. Olarte 2 , M. Cambeiro 2 , J.<br />

Aristu 2 , J. GarcíaFoncillas 1 , M. San Julián 3 , J. Alcalde 4 , M. Jurado 5 , R.<br />

MartinezMonge 2<br />

1<br />

Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Medical Oncology, Pamplona, Spain<br />

2<br />

Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Radiation Oncology, Pamplona,<br />

Spain<br />

3<br />

Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Orthopedic Surgery, Pamplona,<br />

Spain<br />

4<br />

Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Otolaryngology, Pamplona, Spain<br />

5<br />

Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Gynaecology, Pamplona, Spain<br />

: To discover which patient, tumor, and treatment<br />

factors determine toxicity after perioperative high doserate<br />

brachytherapy (PHDRB).<br />

: Patients (n=329) enrolled in several PHDRB<br />

prospective Phase III studies conducted at the Clínica Universidad de<br />

Navarra were analyzed. Two hundred and twelve patients received<br />

one course <strong>of</strong> primary PHDRB +/ EBRT, and 117 patients received<br />

PHDRB after one or several EBRT or brachytherapy courses.<br />

: The median followup was 2.3 years (range, 0.1 – <strong>10</strong>.2). The<br />

highest toxic event observed was grade ≥ 3 in <strong>10</strong>5 cases (31.9%), grade<br />

≥ 4 in 54 cases (16.4%), and grade 5 in <strong>12</strong> cases (3.6%). The first grade<br />

≥ 3 and ≥ 4 <strong>events</strong> occurred at a median time <strong>of</strong> 3.8 months and 3.0<br />

months after surgery, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that<br />

Grade ≥ 3 complications increased with TV150 ≥ 13 cc (p=0.004),<br />

lifetime Eq2Gy ≥ 80Gy (p=0.013), and time to loading ≥ 5 days<br />

(p=0.034). Grade ≥ 4 complications also increased with TV150 ≥ 13 cc<br />

(p=0.035), lifetime Eq2Gy ≥ 95Gy (p=0.001), and time to loading ≥ 5<br />

days (p=0.041). The combination <strong>of</strong> the three variables increased the<br />

predictive ability <strong>of</strong> the model for grade ≥3 complications (AUC =<br />

0.619; p=0.0001) and grade ≥4 complications (AUC = 0.663; p=0.0001).<br />

: Grade ≥ 3 and grade ≥ 4 complications observed after<br />

surgery + PHDRB are multifactorial in origin and are mainly dependent<br />

upon treatment factors (TV150, lifetime Eq2Gy and time to loading).<br />

PO382<br />

DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON OF 131CS VERSUS <strong>12</strong>5I INTRAOPERATIVE<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT RESECTED BRAIN TUMORS<br />

A.G. Wernicke 1 , T.H. Schwartz 2 , P. Stieg 2 , J.A. Boockvar 2 , S.<br />

Pannullo 2 , L. Nedialkova 1 , A.M. Sabbas 1 , B. Parashar 1 , D. Nori 1 , K.S.C.<br />

Chao 1<br />

1<br />

Weill Cornell Medical Center <strong>of</strong> Cornell University, Radiation<br />

Oncology, New York, USA<br />

2<br />

Weill Cornell Medical Center <strong>of</strong> Cornell University, Neurosurgery,<br />

New York NY, USA<br />

: A prospective ongoing trial assesses feasibility <strong>of</strong><br />

131<br />

Csbased intraoperative brachytherapy in patients undergoing<br />

maximally safe neurosurgical resection <strong>of</strong> brain tumors. Intra<br />

<strong>12</strong>5<br />

operative I brachytherapy was previously established in<br />

neurosurgically resected brain tumors with up to 26% radiation<br />

necrosis (UCSF) until 131 Cs emerged as a novel radioisotope with more<br />

favorable physical and radiobiological characteristics. In this analysis,<br />

we created 2 plans for each patient so as to compare dosimetric<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>5 I and 131 Cs.<br />

: After obtaining an IRB approval, a total <strong>of</strong> 17<br />

patients were prospectively accrued to an ongoing trial and treated<br />

with 131 Csbased brachytherapy (<strong>10</strong> with newly diagnosed solitary<br />

brain metastases and 7 with recurrent high grade tumors) between<br />

September 20<strong>10</strong> and September 2011. Median age at diagnosis was 55<br />

years (range, 4784 years). A dose <strong>of</strong> 80 Gy was prescribed to the<br />

tumor surface, using median activity <strong>of</strong> 131 Cs 2.87 U (range, 2.11 <br />

3.08 U). The patients were treated with 131 Cs. A separate plan was<br />

created for each patient where a dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>0Gy was prescribed to the<br />

tumor surface, with activity <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>5 I implants 0.70 U (0.55 mCi) based<br />

on experience from UCSF. V<strong>10</strong>0 represents the volume delineated by<br />

the seeds which is the CTV. A dose distribution to the healthy brain<br />

tissue was determined as the median difference <strong>of</strong> volumes (V) at 3<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> isodose lines in all patients: 80<strong>10</strong>0%, 50<strong>10</strong>0%, and 30<strong>10</strong>0%.<br />

A statistical analysis employed ttest to perform comparisons <strong>of</strong> the<br />

dosimetric pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> the two isotopes.<br />

: The median implanted tumor cavity volume was 8.98 cc<br />

(range, 1.75 76.63 cc). The median number <strong>of</strong> seeds placed into the<br />

neurosurgical cavity was <strong>12</strong> (range, 550). For 131 Cs implants compared<br />

to <strong>12</strong>5 I implant, median V80% was 11.93cc vs. 16.89cc (p=0.002);<br />

median V50% was 21.56 cc vs. 29.11 cc (p=0.004); median V30% was<br />

40.69cc vs. 52.11cc (p=0.01). The corresponding delta volumes were<br />

median V80<strong>10</strong>0%: 3.13cc vs. 3.85cc (p=0.009); median V50<strong>10</strong>0%:<br />

<strong>12</strong>.84cc vs. 16.07cc (p=0.03); median V30<strong>10</strong>0%: 32.69cc vs. 39.08cc<br />

(p=0.06).<br />

: 131 Csbased intraoperative brachytherapy can be used to<br />

achieve a more compact dose distribution than the previously<br />

established <strong>12</strong>5 Ibased approach, thus potentially predisposing less<br />

normal tissue to toxicity such as radiation necrosis. A prospective<br />

clinical study is in progress to assess local control, toxicity and<br />

survival outcomes using this treatment modality in patients with<br />

neurosurgically resected brain tumors.<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 153<br />

PO383<br />

CESIUM131 BRACHYTHERAPY FOR HEAD AND NECK CANCERS: FIRST<br />

REPORT OF OUTCOMES, TOXICITY AND RADIATION EXPOSURE<br />

B. Parashar 1 , S. Arora 1 , A. Pavese 2 , D. Kutler 3 , W. Kuhel 3 , S. Trichter 1 ,<br />

A.G. Wernicke 1 , D. Nori 1 , K.S.C. Chao 1<br />

1<br />

New York Hospital/Cornell Med.Cente, Radiation Oncology, New<br />

York, USA<br />

2<br />

New York Hospital/Cornell Med.Cente, Health Physics, New York,<br />

USA<br />

3<br />

New York Hospital/Cornell Med.Cente, Otorhinolaryngology, New<br />

York, USA<br />

: Cesium131 is an encapsulated radioactive<br />

isotope that is approved for head and neck cancer (HNC)<br />

brachytherapy. It has a shorter halflife (9.7 days) but similar energy<br />

to Iodine<strong>12</strong>5 (I<strong>12</strong>5). Recurrent HNC are common and pose a<br />

significant therapeutic challenge. This report evaluates the outcomes,<br />

toxicity and radiation exposure in patients with high risk and<br />

recurrent HN cancers treated with surgery followed by Cs131<br />

brachytherapy.<br />

: Eighteen Cs131 implants were performed in<br />

14 patients from 20092011. There were 6 males and 8 females. Most<br />

common histology was squamous cell carcinoma. Other histologies<br />

were merkel cell carcinoma, carcinosarcoma and osteosarcoma.<br />

Twelve patients had previously received a full course <strong>of</strong> radiation<br />

therapy. Of the patients without prior RT, one received a neck<br />

implant after surgery for tonsil primary since he refused external<br />

radiation. Another patient with Merkel cell skin cancer received a<br />

neck implant after nodal disease progression during adjuvant<br />

radiation. After surgical resection, Cs131 seeds were placed 0.51cm<br />

apart on the tumor bed to deliver 80Gy at 0.5 cm (based on Cs131<br />

nomogram). Lead shields and gowns were used by radiation<br />

oncologists and surgeons. Dosimetric CT scan was performed within a<br />

week <strong>of</strong> the implant. Patients were followed by clinical exam and<br />

imaging. Local control was defined as no clinical/radiological<br />

evidence <strong>of</strong> recurrence in the area <strong>of</strong> implant. In keeping with Nuclear<br />

Regulatory Commission (NRC) guidelines, exposure rate at 1 meter (m)<br />

was measured following the procedure using a Keithley survey counter<br />

(ion chamber).<br />

: Median age was 71y (range 2288y). Primary tumors that<br />

were included were those <strong>of</strong> oral cavity, oropharynx, paranasal sinus<br />

and skin with neck nodes. Seventeen <strong>of</strong> eighteen implants were<br />

performed in recurrent tumor after surgical resection. Median number<br />

<strong>of</strong> seeds were 21 (Range <strong>10</strong>58). Median seed activity was 2.4 Gy<br />

m 2 /h (range 0.952.5). Median followup was <strong>10</strong> months (range 224<br />

months). Local control was 77.7% (14/18 implants). Four patients<br />

(28.5%) developed distant metastasis. Four patients have died at the<br />

time <strong>of</strong> last followup due to distant metastasis. There was no RTOG<br />

grade 3 or 4 toxicity related to the implants. The median RT exposure<br />

rate at 1 meter postimplant was 2.3mrem/hr postimplant<br />

(recommended limits to radiation exposure to pr<strong>of</strong>essionals5000<br />

mrem/y for stochastic effects, 15000 mrem/yr for lens <strong>of</strong> the eye and<br />

and 50,000mrem/yr for all others).<br />

: Cs131 LDR brachytherapy is a safe and effective option<br />

for high risk Head and neck cancers. It produces high control rates,<br />

limited toxicity and is safe for health personnel in terms <strong>of</strong> radiation<br />

exposure.<br />

PO384<br />

COMBINED EXTERNAL BEAM RADIOTHERAPY AND INTRALUMINAL<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL CANCER<br />

D. Scepanovic 1 , M. Pobijakova 1 , P. Lukacko 1 , M. Masar 1 , Z. Dolinska 1 ,<br />

A. Masarykova 1<br />

1 National Oncology Institute, Radiation Oncology, Bratislava, Slovakia<br />

: The main objective <strong>of</strong> treatment for locally<br />

advanced esophageal cancer remains palliation <strong>of</strong> dysphagia.<br />

Radiotherapy for palliation can be external beam alone, intraluminal<br />

brachytherapy (ILBT) alone, or a combination <strong>of</strong> both.<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> our study was to compare the effect <strong>of</strong> combined<br />

external and intraluminal radiation treatment versus external beam<br />

radiotherapy alone (EBRT).<br />

: Between 2006 and 20<strong>10</strong>, 66 patients (pts)<br />

with locally advanced esophageal cancer received radiation therapy<br />

(RT) with/without chemotherapy (CT). Patients without evidence <strong>of</strong><br />

metastatic disease were identified. Combined EBRT/ILBT and EBRT<br />

alone were performed in 26 and 40 pts, respectively. ILBT with high<br />

doserate Ir192 source was applied after pts completed EBRT as a<br />

boost therapy. The external radiation was performed with a median<br />

total dose <strong>of</strong> 46Gy given in 23 fractions. On the average a week after<br />

the external radiation a median total dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong>Gy ILBT was given in 2<br />

fractions. The longterm outcomes were investigated with a median<br />

followup time <strong>of</strong> 20 months.<br />

: The overall cumulative survival rate was <strong>10</strong>% at 5 years for<br />

whole group <strong>of</strong> pts. The cause specific survival rate at 5 years was 4%<br />

in the external irradiation alone group and 22% in ILBT combined<br />

group. There was statistically significant difference between two<br />

groups <strong>of</strong> patients regarding overall survival (OS) (p = 0.0002). The<br />

incidence <strong>of</strong> early and late complications did not differ according to<br />

whether ILBT was used.<br />

: The usefulness <strong>of</strong> ILBT, as additional irradiation in large<br />

advanced tumors has been shown similar results for dysphagiafree<br />

survival, stenosis, and fistulas and is equally effective in palliation <strong>of</strong><br />

advanced esophageal cancer. ILBT as a boost treatment seems to<br />

contribute to the prolonged survival <strong>of</strong> these pts (p=0.0279).<br />

PO385<br />

SUBLOBAR RESECTION AND BRACHYTHERAPY FOR NON SMALL CELL<br />

LUNG CANCER IN PATIENTS WITH HISTORY OF PRIOR MALIGNANCY<br />

A. Jain 1 , C. Connery 2 , F. Bhora 2 , W. Choi 1 , A. Evans 1<br />

1<br />

St. Luke'sRoosevelt Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

New York, USA<br />

2<br />

St. Luke'sRoosevelt Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Surgery, New York, USA<br />

: Patients with a history <strong>of</strong> malignancy and a new<br />

diagnosis <strong>of</strong> early stage lung cancer can pose a challenging clinical<br />

problem. Previous oncologic treatments or comorbidities may limit<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> conventional treatment options. Patients in this group who<br />

are not candidates for lobectomy have been <strong>of</strong>fered sublobar<br />

resection plus brachytherapy at our institution and clinical outcomes<br />

are reported here.<br />

: Records <strong>of</strong> patients who underwent sublobar<br />

resection plus brachytherapy for a new diagnosis <strong>of</strong> early stage lung<br />

cancer from 2006 to 2011 at our institution were reviewed to identify<br />

patients with prior malignancies. Patients were determined by pre<br />

treatment evaluation to have T1 or T2 lung cancer with tumors


S154 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Median age was 76. There were a total <strong>of</strong> 20 prior malignancies in this<br />

group; 6 Lung, 4 Breast, 4 Gastrointestinal, 3 Prostate, 1 Head and<br />

Neck, 1 Lymphoma, and 1 Skin. 4 patients had previous lobectomy, 3<br />

patients had previous thoracic radiation, and 1 patient had both<br />

lobectomy and thoracic radiation for treatment <strong>of</strong> prior malignancy.<br />

Final pathologic staging showed T1N0 disease in 13 patients, T2N0<br />

disease in 3 patients, and T2N2 disease in 1 patient. Median follow up<br />

was 13.3 months (range 3.652.3 months). Local control at last follow<br />

up was <strong>10</strong>0% and regional control was 87.5%. Disease specific survival<br />

for lung cancer was 94% and overall survival was 76%. Postoperative<br />

complications were seen in 4 patients including readmission for<br />

inpatient rehabilitation, pneumothorax, acute pulmonary embolism<br />

(PE) and death due to pneumosepsis. Among the group <strong>of</strong> 8 patients<br />

with previous lobectomy and/or thoracic radiation the procedure was<br />

well tolerated with one acute PE as the only postoperative<br />

complication seen. At last follow up, there was one death in this<br />

group, from progressive lung cancer.<br />

: Sublobar resection plus brachytherapy is a feasible<br />

option in appropriately selected patients with early stage non small<br />

cell lung cancer and a history <strong>of</strong> prior malignancy. Previous lobectomy<br />

or thoracic radiation for prior malignancy should not be considered<br />

exclusion criteria for this procedure.<br />

PO386<br />

ENDOBRONCHIAL BRACHYTHERAPYAS ADJUVANT TREATMENTIN<br />

PRIMARY BRONCHIAL N.S.C.L.C TUMORS<br />

K. Papalla 1 , B. Polizoi 2 , I. Tsalafoutas 3 , D. Bisirtzoglou 4 , A. Zettos 4 , B.<br />

Anastasakos 4 , G. Politis 4 , I. Katsilieris 1<br />

1 St. Savvas Anticancer Institute, 3rd Radiotherapy, Athens, Greece<br />

2 St. Savvas Anticancer Institute, Radiotherapy, Athens, Greece<br />

3 St. Savvas Anticancer Institute, Medical Physics, Athens, Greece<br />

4 St. Savvas Anticancer Institute, Pulmonary Disease, Athens, Greece<br />

: Currently, lung cancer is characterized by<br />

increasing incidence rate and minimal improvement in mortality rate.<br />

For this reason its therapeutic management is concidered to be one <strong>of</strong><br />

the most difficult tasks. About 40%<strong>of</strong> all lung cancers are<br />

adenocarcinoma, and about 1520% are nonsmall cell lung<br />

cancer(NSCLC) with squamous cells. In these cases,surgery <strong>of</strong>fers the<br />

best chance for cure. A 75% <strong>of</strong> the patients present locally advanced<br />

non resectable disease. For these patients Chemotherapy and/or<br />

External Radiation Therapy(ERT) are the treatments <strong>of</strong> choice,<br />

however,this therapeutic approach is associated with low survival and<br />

high rates <strong>of</strong> local recurrence. Recently EBBT has been applied in<br />

combination with ERT as the curative treatment <strong>of</strong> choice in selected<br />

primary bronchial and tracheal tumors. These treatment starts in our<br />

department since March 20<strong>10</strong>, for observing symptomatic response<br />

rates, duration <strong>of</strong> symptoms palliation, obstruction scores, quality <strong>of</strong><br />

life outcomes and complications in various patients groups.<br />

: Under bronchospopic quidance, a<br />

polyethelene catheter with a guide wire was placed into the involved<br />

airway and it was advanced until its edge passed by the lower end <strong>of</strong><br />

the tumor. The bronchoscope and guidewire were then removed,<br />

leaving the catheter in place. A radiopaque insert with marker pellets<br />

(dummy) was placed into the catheter to indicate the source positions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the high dose rate(HDR) Iridium source. This was fastened<br />

externally to the patient, after its proper placement had been<br />

confirmed fluoroscopically. Utilizing the bronchoscopic findings<br />

concering the tumor load and location, the radiation oncologist<br />

determined the radiation dosing. Two radiographs (anteroposterior<br />

and lateral) were acquried for treatment planning purposes<br />

(irradiation length and dwell time <strong>of</strong> the iridium source at various<br />

positions) using specialized s<strong>of</strong>tware. Fortyfive patients were<br />

treated, using a total EBBT dose <strong>of</strong> 16Gy, delivered in two by 8 Gy<br />

fractions, one fraction per week. Group A (patients with primary lung<br />

tumors), received 3050 Gy by ERT and two by 8 Gy EBBT fractions.<br />

Group B (patients with recurent or metastatic tumors), received two<br />

by 8 Gy EBBT fractions after ERT for palliative treatment <strong>of</strong> acute<br />

respiratory symptoms.<br />

: The overall symptomatic responce rates were 91% for<br />

dyspnea, 84% for cough, 94% for hemoptysis and 83% for obstructive<br />

pneumonia. There was no significant difference between the two<br />

groups. The median time to relapse <strong>of</strong> symptoms was 48 months for<br />

all symptoms and the median time for symptoms progression was 611<br />

months.<br />

: Endobronchial brachytherapy is an established modality<br />

for the palliation <strong>of</strong> advanced nosmall cell lung cancer, in the case <strong>of</strong><br />

endobronchial recurence after ERT, used for centrally localized lung<br />

cancer alone or in combination with ERT.<br />

PO387<br />

MANCHESTER SYSTEM TREATMENTS TO THE SKIN SURFACE; FROM<br />

RADIUM TO IRIDIUM HDR (1953 TO 20<strong>12</strong>)<br />

D. Wood 1 , S. Baker 1 , E. Allan 2 , H. Farrow 3<br />

1<br />

The Christie Hospital, <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Manchester, United Kingdom<br />

2<br />

The Christie Hospital, Clinical Oncology, Manchester, United<br />

Kingdom<br />

3<br />

The Christie Hospital, C.M.P.E., Manchester, United Kingdom<br />

: Skin surface mould treatments have been carried<br />

out using the classical Manchester system tables presented by<br />

Meredith in 1953, the only change since being the move to SI units.<br />

The tables provide for a given area and treatment height, the total<br />

source activity needed to give a unit <strong>of</strong> prescription dose at the skin<br />

surface, assuming a uniform distribution <strong>of</strong> sources around the<br />

treatment area, in accordance with Manchester system rules. The aim<br />

<strong>of</strong> this work is to assess how typical treatments using HDR, differ from<br />

that calculated assuming uniform source arrangements and flat<br />

geometry as in the classical Manchester system approach.<br />

: Manchester system distribution rules were<br />

used to determine source positioning for a variety <strong>of</strong> geometric<br />

phantom arrangements and patient treatments, and the treatment<br />

times calculated. The dose distributions were then assessed using<br />

Oncentra Brachy v4.0. against an array <strong>of</strong> surface dose points.<br />

: Air gaps were quantifiable in CT scans taken <strong>of</strong> the mould<br />

when fitted to the patient, this led to a reduction to dose at the skin<br />

surface by up to 15% for a 2mm air gap, and 32% for a 5mm air gap<br />

compared with assumed optimal treatment geometry.<br />

The arrangement <strong>of</strong> dwell positions around a near semicylinder or<br />

around an irregular area can lead to significant variation <strong>of</strong> the dose<br />

received at the skin surface compared with that for a flat treatment<br />

area considered to be equivalent in the system approach.<br />

a) Manchester system treatment times b) Optimised treatment times<br />

The Manchester tables are calculated assuming only inverse square<br />

law dose dependence. The additional effects <strong>of</strong> dose fall <strong>of</strong>f due to<br />

source anisotropy and absorption and scatter in water as per TG43<br />

calculations are significant, particularly for greater treatment<br />

distances above the skin surface.<br />

: It is advisable to correct calculation methodologies to<br />

account for individual treatment geometries, the assessment <strong>of</strong> air<br />

gaps, and more accurate source modelling, otherwise the treatment<br />

dose delivered at the skin surface may be significantly inaccurate.<br />

However, it is important when following a well established system<br />

approach to assess the treatment dose typically received before<br />

making informed modifications to individual treatment plans.<br />

PO388<br />

CONTACTHERAPY FOR CARCINOMA OF THE EYELID: A REPORT OF 29<br />

CASES.<br />

K. Benezery 1 , R. Natale 1 , A. Courdi 1 , M.E. Chand 1 , J. Lagier 2 , D.<br />

Flores 2 , S. Marcie 1 , M. Gauthier 1 , J. Feuillade 1 , J.P. Gerard 1<br />

1<br />

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Radiotherapy, Nice, France<br />

2<br />

CHU St ROCH, Ophtalmologie, Nice, France<br />

: To assess the tolerance and efficacy <strong>of</strong> contact x<br />

ray therapy (CXR) in the management <strong>of</strong> eyelid tumours.<br />

: 29 patients were treated from February 2009<br />

to December 2011, using a RT 50 Philips or the new PAPILLON 50 unit<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 155<br />

delivering a 50kV maximal energy Xray beam. Out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 28<br />

patients, one had two synchronous tumours. Age ranged from 48 to 94<br />

years (median: 77.3), with a male female ratio <strong>of</strong> 1. Site: lateral<br />

canthus = 3 %, medial canthus = 31%, lower eyelid = 45 %, upper eyelid<br />

= 21 %. There were 80 % (23) basal cell carcinomas, 17% (5) squamous<br />

cell carcinoma, 3% (1) melanoma. No tumour exceeded T1b. Five<br />

patients were referred for radical radiotherapy treatment (first event)<br />

and twentyfour patients for postoperative treatment: among them,<br />

R0 excision = 2 (1 first event, 1 recurrence), R1 excision = 22 (15 first<br />

<strong>events</strong>, 7 recurrences). They were treated according to 2 schemes: 42<br />

Gy in six fractions <strong>of</strong> 7 Gy (23 %) for radical treatment, 35 Gy in 5<br />

fractions <strong>of</strong> 7 Gy (77 %) in case <strong>of</strong> postoperative treatment.<br />

: Followup ranged from 2 to 24 months. Five patients were<br />

lost to followup. One local relapse occurred 2 months after<br />

treatment, outside the treated area. Side effects: All patients had<br />

Grade I (55%) or II (45 %) erythema and loss <strong>of</strong> the eyelashes in the<br />

treated area during treatment. 17% had GI eye watering, <strong>10</strong>% suffered<br />

from a GII conjunctivitis, and 3% had a G II pilo sebaceous gland<br />

infection. Sequelae: persistent watering <strong>of</strong> the eye for 21%, xerosis for<br />

14%, one ectropion, one definitive loss <strong>of</strong> eyelashes and one with<br />

slightly depigmented skin. No cataract was observed. Majority <strong>of</strong><br />

patients assessed were more than satisfied with both the cosmetic<br />

and function that followed radiotherapy.<br />

: CXR therapy <strong>of</strong> the eyelid for skin carcinoma is an<br />

effective treatment, with no local relapse except one outside the<br />

treated area, with few significant side effects or sequelae in this<br />

elderly population.<br />

PO389<br />

INTERSTITIAL PERMANENT IMPLANTATION OF <strong>12</strong>5 I SEEDS FOR<br />

REFRACTORY CHEST WALL MATASTASIS OR RECURRENCE<br />

P. Jiang 1 , J. Wang 1 , Y. Jiang 1 , W. Jiang 1 , N.A. Meng 1 , R. Yang 1<br />

1<br />

Peking University Third Hospital, Radiotherapeutic Department,<br />

Beijing, China<br />

: To evaluate the efficacy and safety <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>5I seeds<br />

implantation for refractory chest wall matastasis or recurrence under<br />

CT guidance. In addition we assessed initial data obtained on the<br />

therapeutic response for refractory chest wall matastasis or<br />

recurrence.<br />

: A retrospective review <strong>of</strong> 20 patients ( from<br />

Jul,2004 to Jan, 2011) who underwent interstitial permanent<br />

implantation <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>5 I seeds under CT guidance. All patients had ever<br />

received at least one modality treatment before <strong>12</strong>5I seeds<br />

implantation and had been reviewed by the surgeons and radiation<br />

oncologists, that they were considered not suitable for salvage surgery<br />

and external beam radiation therapy again or the patients refused to<br />

receive. The tumor volumes were measured using CT scans at 5mm<br />

intervals 35days before seed implantation.Postoperative dosimetry<br />

was routinely performed for all patients. The D90 (the doses delivered<br />

to 90% <strong>of</strong> the target volume de?ned by CT using dosevolume<br />

histogram) <strong>of</strong> the implanted <strong>12</strong>5 I seeds ranged from <strong>10</strong>0Gy to 160Gy<br />

(median:130Gy). The activity <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>5 I seeds ranged from 0.5mCi to<br />

0.78mCi (median: 0.71mCi). The total number <strong>of</strong> seeds implanted<br />

ranged from 8 to 269 (median: 53). The followup period ranged from<br />

3 to 54 months(median: 11.5months). The survival and local control<br />

probabilities were calculated by the KaplanMeier method.<br />

: The 1 ,2,3and 4year tumor control rates were all 88.7%<br />

respectively. The 1 and 2,3,4year cancer specific survival rates<br />

were 56.5% and 47.1%, 47.1%, 47.1% respectively. The 1 and 2,3,4<br />

year overall survival rates were 53.3% and 35.6%, 35.6%, 35.6%<br />

respectively, with a median survival <strong>of</strong> 15 months (95% CI,7.0–22.9).<br />

Mild brachial plexus injury was seen in one patient, grade 1 or 2 skin<br />

reactions were seen in 6 patients (30%) who had received external<br />

beam radiation therapy before. No grade 3 and 4 skin side effects<br />

were found. Rib fracture, ulceration, pneumothorax or<br />

hemopneumothorax were not seen.<br />

: Interstitial permanent implantation <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>5 I seeds under<br />

CT guidance is feasible, efficacy and safe for refractory chest wall<br />

matastasis or recurrence.<br />

PO390<br />

INTRAOPERATIVE AND PERCUTANEOUS IR192 BRACHYTHERAPY FOR<br />

MULTIPLY IRRADIATED LESIONS OF THE SPINE<br />

Y. Yamada 1 , M.R. Folkert 1 , G.N. Cohen 2 , M. Zaider 2 , J. Chiu 2 , E. Lis 3 ,<br />

G. Krol 3 , M.H. Bilsky 4<br />

1<br />

Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, New<br />

York NY, USA<br />

2<br />

Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Medical Physics, New York<br />

NY, USA<br />

3<br />

Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Neuroradiology, New York<br />

NY, USA<br />

4<br />

Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Neurosurgery, New York<br />

NY, USA<br />

: While advances in stereotactic external beam<br />

radiation therapy have improved local control <strong>of</strong> spine metastases,<br />

progression <strong>of</strong> disease is still a significant problem and repeat<br />

irradiation is complicated by normal tissue tolerance, particularly that<br />

<strong>of</strong> the spinal cord. Intraoperative and percutaneous highdose rate<br />

brachytherapy techniques have been developed to address this issue<br />

and improve local control, pain control, and prevent progressive<br />

neurological deficits.<br />

: A series <strong>of</strong> patients were identified with<br />

progressive disease at multiply irradiated sites in the spine; 2 patients<br />

subsequently received intraoperative HDR brachytherapy using<br />

catheters placed in the vertebral bodies during surgery and 1 patient<br />

was treated with percutaneously implanted catheters with the<br />

assistance <strong>of</strong> interventional radiology. In all cases catheter placement<br />

was performed under general anesthesia; using either direct<br />

visualization or fluoroscopic guidance, trocars were placed into the<br />

vertebral body and pedicles, after which flexible afterloader


S156 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

catheters were placed through these trocars and the position <strong>of</strong> the<br />

catheters was confirmed by fluoroscopic imaging. A planning CT scan<br />

was taken in the treatment position; using this intraoperative CT scan<br />

and preoperative imaging, the patient's spinal cord/cauda, gross<br />

tumor volume and a clinical volume were contoured. A treatment plan<br />

was generated and following plan review and approval, the patients<br />

were treated with radiation delivered in a single fraction using high<br />

doserate Ir192 brachytherapy. All treatments were performed using<br />

a GammaMed Plus HDR Unit, after which the catheters were removed.<br />

Patients were reassessed clinically at 24 weeks and then with serial<br />

imaging and clinical assessment.<br />

: In all cases treatment was successfully delivered with no<br />

brachytherapyrelated complications. At a median followup <strong>of</strong> 5.7<br />

months, there has been no local progression <strong>of</strong> disease. Median dose<br />

delivered was 1400 cGy (range <strong>12</strong>001800 cGy) with a median GTV V90<br />

<strong>of</strong> 57% (range 4089%). In all cases the spinal cord/cauda maximum<br />

dose constraints were met. 2 patients (66.7%) had significant pain<br />

relief 14 weeks following treatment.<br />

: Intraoperative and percutaneous Ir192 HDR spine<br />

brachytherapy is not associated with complications or acute toxicity;<br />

while these therapeutic methodologies are in the early investigational<br />

stages, they may provide a safe and effective means <strong>of</strong> treating<br />

multiply irradiated sites <strong>of</strong> disease progression in the spine. In<br />

addition, use <strong>of</strong> the percutaneous technique provides a novel salvage<br />

treatment modality for patients who are not appropriate surgical<br />

candidates.<br />

PO391<br />

INTRAOPERATIVE BRACHYTHERAPY FOR THORACIC MALIGNANCIES<br />

RESECTED WITH CLOSE OR POSITIVE MARGINS<br />

A.J. Wu 1 , G.N. Cohen 2 , K.E. Rosenzweig 3 , M.J. Zelefsky 1 , M.S. Bains 4 ,<br />

A. Rimner 1<br />

1<br />

Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, New<br />

York NY, USA<br />

2<br />

Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Medical Physics, New York<br />

NY, USA<br />

3<br />

Mount Sinai Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, New York NY, USA<br />

4<br />

Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Thoracic Surgery, New York<br />

NY, USA<br />

: Local recurrence is a significant problem after<br />

surgical resection <strong>of</strong> thoracic malignancies, particularly when close or<br />

positive margins are anticipated. As intraoperative radiotherapy can<br />

deliver radiation directly to the threatened margin, we used this<br />

technique in an attempt to reduce local recurrence, particularly for<br />

patients who had already received external beam radiation. We<br />

reviewed our experience with thoracic intraoperative brachytherapy<br />

to assess disease control and toxicity outcomes.<br />

: We performed a retrospective review <strong>of</strong><br />

patients undergoing permanent I<strong>12</strong>5 mesh placement or temporary Ir<br />

192 afterloading therapy during surgical resection <strong>of</strong> primary or<br />

metastatic thoracic tumors between 2001 and 2011. In general, for I<br />

<strong>12</strong>5 brachytherapy, iodine seeds were sutured into a mesh at 1cm<br />

intervals to form a planar implant delivering <strong>10</strong>0150Gy to the MPD,<br />

which was then sutured onto the atrisk site. For Ir192<br />

brachytherapy, a HAM applicator was apposed to the atrisk site, then<br />

connected to the afterloader to deliver <strong>12</strong>15Gy to a depth <strong>of</strong> 0.5cm<br />

from the applicator surface.<br />

: Fortyone procedures (33 permanent, 8 temporary) were<br />

performed on 40 patients (2874 years old, median 57). Histology <strong>of</strong><br />

tumors was NSCLC (n=19), sarcoma (n=<strong>12</strong>), mesothelioma (n=2),<br />

thymic carcinoma (n=7) and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (n=1).<br />

Treated sites were lung (n=16), chest wall/paraspinal (n=16), and<br />

mediastinum (n=9). Twentysix patients had previously received EBRT<br />

to the area (median 50.4 Gy). Final margins were microscopically<br />

negative in 20 cases (49%) and positive or not assessable in the<br />

remainder. The median size <strong>of</strong> the treated area was 25cm 2 (range: 4<br />

70cm 2 ). The median followup was 30 months. Actuarial local control<br />

at 1 and 2 years was 74% and 67% respectively. Overall survival at 1<br />

and 2 years was 86% and 75% respectively. No perioperative deaths<br />

occurred. There was no significant difference in local control<br />

according to margin status or brachytherapy technique. Seven<br />

patients (17%) experienced toxicity possibly related to brachytherapy:<br />

4 patients required reoperation for empyema, 1 patient developed<br />

apparent bronchopleural fistula, and 1 patient developed possible<br />

radiation pneumonitis. One patient, who also had a distant history <strong>of</strong><br />

mantlefield irradiation for lymphoma, died from complications <strong>of</strong> SVC<br />

syndrome possibly related to radiation fibrosis, four years after<br />

brachytherapy.<br />

: Intraoperative brachytherapy is associated with good<br />

local control after resection <strong>of</strong> thoracic tumors felt to be at very high<br />

risk for recurrence due to close or positive margins. There does not<br />

appear to be an excessive rate <strong>of</strong> severe toxicity attributable to<br />

brachytherapy. Intraoperative brachytherapy should be considered in<br />

situations where the oncologic completeness <strong>of</strong> thoracic tumor<br />

resection is in doubt.<br />

PO392<br />

POSTOPERATIVE INTERSTITIAL PULSEDDOSERATE (PDR) BRACHY<br />

THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF THERAPYRESISTANT KELOIDS<br />

R. Davila Fajardo 1 , R. Van Os 1 , O. Lapid 2 , R. Noordanus 3 , B. Pieters 1<br />

1<br />

Academic Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The<br />

Netherlands<br />

2<br />

Academic Medical Center, Plastic Surgery, Amsterdam, The<br />

Netherlands<br />

3<br />

Flevoziekenhuis Hospital, Plastic Surgery, Almere, The Netherlands<br />

: To evaluate the results <strong>of</strong> pulseddoserate (PDR)<br />

brachytherapy after excision <strong>of</strong> the therapyresistant keloids treated<br />

between 2007 and 2011 in our institution.<br />

: Between July 2007 and December 2011, 24<br />

consecutive patients (11 male, 13 female), with 28 keloids were<br />

treated in our department with immediate adjuvant brachytherapy<br />

after surgical excision. Most <strong>of</strong> them appeared to be caused by<br />

previous trauma, surgery or infection. Histological keloid confirmation<br />

was obtained in 14% <strong>of</strong> the cases. In 91% <strong>of</strong> the patients the<br />

Fitzpatrick scale grade was recorded. Sixty four percent <strong>of</strong> the keloids<br />

had been previously treated either by surgical excision or intralesional<br />

steroid injections (KenacortA®), the rest conservatively. The median<br />

followup time was 7.2 months [range 034.4]. All keloids underwent<br />

surgical excision under local anaesthetic, placing <strong>of</strong> a plastic catheter<br />

(Best®) and the wound was primarily closed with subcutaneous<br />

suture. The irradiation was performed with a PDR afterloader device<br />

using an Ir192 source. One single fraction <strong>of</strong> 13Gy was administered<br />

with a <strong>10</strong>0% reference isodose line at the surface <strong>of</strong> the skin (47mm)<br />

in the central plane. Biologically effective dose (BED) 29.9Gy<br />

(α/β=<strong>10</strong>). Recurrence was defined as a growing nodular pruritic scar<br />

infield or beyond the surgical and irradiated area.<br />

: Recurrence free survival at <strong>12</strong> months was 80% (figure 1.<br />

KaplanMeier curve). The median time to recurrence was 5.3 months<br />

[range 034.4]. Four patients developed pruritus in a flat scar and<br />

they were treated with steroid injections with no growing nodular scar<br />

in the followup. These patients are not included in the recurrence<br />

group. Multivariate analysis showed the gender as significant factor<br />

for recurrence free survival to the detriment <strong>of</strong> male condition<br />

(p=0.04). While Fitzpatrick scale grade and location <strong>of</strong> the keloid<br />

were no significant factors for recurrence free survival (p=0.27 and<br />

p=0.54, respectively).Three patients developed hyperpigmentation <strong>of</strong><br />

the scar, grade1 as toxicity <strong>of</strong> the irradiation, probably also related to<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> steroids, and one hypopigmentation <strong>of</strong> the scar grade 1,<br />

(CTC 4.0). No second malignancy has been described.<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 157<br />

<br />

: Surgical excision followed by postoperative irradiation in<br />

the form <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> the therapyresistant keloids <strong>of</strong>fers a<br />

reasonable good local control in the literature reviewed.<br />

Traditionally LDR and most recently HDR brachytherapy schemes have<br />

been reported with BED ≈30Gy, showing low recurrence rate.<br />

This comfortable PDR scheme consisting <strong>of</strong> 13Gy in a single fraction<br />

and one pulse provides a similar recurrence free survival to previous<br />

described, with a low toxicity rate.<br />

PO393<br />

<strong>12</strong>5I SEEDS BRACHYTHERAPY TO TREAT MALIGNANT SUBLINGUAL<br />

GLAND TUMORS<br />

Y. Shi 1 , M.W. Huang 1 , L. Zheng 1 , S.M. Liu 1 , J. Zhang 1 , J.G. Zhang 1<br />

1<br />

Peking University School <strong>of</strong> Stomatology, Oral & Maxill<strong>of</strong>acial<br />

Sugery, Beijing, China<br />

: The goal <strong>of</strong> the study is to conclude local control<br />

rate, survival rate <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy using <strong>12</strong>5 I radioactive seeds for<br />

treating malignant sublingual gland tumors.<br />

: Twentyone patients <strong>of</strong> sublingual gland<br />

derived malignant tumor, including nine males and twelve females,<br />

median age 51, were collected in the study. There were 16 adenoid<br />

cystic carcinoma, 3 mucoepidermoid carcinoma, 1 adenoid carcinoma<br />

and 1 malignant pleomorphic adenoma. Twenty patients were treated<br />

by surgical resection, eleven were local tumor resection and nine<br />

were composite procedures, including four segmental<br />

mandibulectomy and five marginal jaw resection. Selective neck<br />

resection was performed in 7 patients. These twenty patients<br />

received <strong>12</strong>5 I seeds interstitial brachytherapy after surgery. One<br />

patient couldn’t afford surgery and received brachytherapy alone.<br />

<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> were designed by treatment planning system. Patients<br />

were implanted a mean amount <strong>of</strong> 39.8 seeds, ranging from 8~92. The<br />

total seeds activity is 31.0mCi (1147MBq) on average. The prescription<br />

dose ranged from 60~<strong>12</strong>0Gy. Each patient received quality verification<br />

and was followed up.<br />

: Twentyone patients were followed up for 16~113 months<br />

(median 44 months). There were one local recurrence and four distant<br />

metastasis, including two died <strong>of</strong> lung metastasis. No severe<br />

complications such as osteomyelitis were observed. The local control<br />

rate is 95.2%. Oneyear and threeyear survival rate is <strong>10</strong>0% and<br />

85.8%. Threeyear survival rate with and without distant metastasis<br />

are <strong>10</strong>0% and 50% respectively (P


S158 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

up <strong>of</strong> the patients was done to analyze acute and late toxicity, local<br />

control and survival.<br />

: After a median follow up <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong> months (range 2 28 months),<br />

s<strong>of</strong>t tissue necrosis was seen in one patient, dysphaia and hemorrhage<br />

in another. No other serious side effects were observed. All the tumor<br />

mass <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> cases disappeared within 6 months, regional metastases<br />

was observed in one patient and distant metastases was observed in<br />

another. Seven <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> patients survived till the date <strong>of</strong> investigation.<br />

: External beam radiotherapy plus I<strong>12</strong>5 seeds<br />

implantation is a safe and effective therapy regimen for patients with<br />

unresectable head and neck cancers.<br />

PO396<br />

I<strong>12</strong>5 BRACHYTHERAPY FOR LOCALLY RECURRENT PAROTID GLAND<br />

CANCER IN PREVIOUSLY IRRADIATED PATIENTS<br />

L. Zheng 1 , J.G. Zhang 1 , J. Zhang 1 , T.L. Song 1 , M.W. Huang 1 , G.Y. Yu 1<br />

1<br />

The Stomotology School and Hospital <strong>of</strong> Peking University, Oral and<br />

Maxill<strong>of</strong>acial Surgery Department, Beijing, China<br />

: This study analyzed the treatment <strong>of</strong> recurrent<br />

parotid gland cancers with radioactive iodine (<strong>12</strong>5I) seed<br />

implantation.<br />

: Fifteen patients with recurrent previously<br />

irradiated parotid gland cancers were treated with postoperative <strong>12</strong>5I<br />

seed implantation between April 2004 and June 2009. Local control,<br />

survival rates and side effects were retrospectively reviewed.<br />

: The 3 and 5year local control rates were 67% and 53.6%,<br />

and the overall survival rates were 76.2% and 66.7%, respectively.<br />

Four HouseBrackman grade IV patients recovered to grade II during<br />

followup. Four patients (26.7%) developed grade IV skin ulceration.<br />

Two patients (13.3%) developed moderate fibrosis <strong>of</strong> the subcutaneous<br />

tissues, and two (13.3%) suffered hearing loss for 1 year after<br />

brachytherapy. There were no severe late toxicities.<br />

: This study showed improved local control and survival<br />

rates in patients who received <strong>12</strong>5I brachytherapy. These findings<br />

should be interpreted cautiously due to the small number <strong>of</strong> patients.<br />

PO397<br />

32PFOILS FOR RADIOACTIVE IMPLANTS IN LOWDOSERATE (LDR)<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

W. Assmann 1 , M. Bader 2 , J. Schirra 3 , C. Schäfer 3 , R. Sroka 4 , C. Stief 2<br />

1<br />

Ludwig Maximilians Universtät München, Fakultät für Physik,<br />

Garching, Germany<br />

2<br />

LMU Klinikum Großhadern, Urologische Klinik, München, Germany<br />

3<br />

LMU Klinikum Großhadern, Medizinische Klinik II, München, Germany<br />

4<br />

LMU Klinikum Großhadern, Laserforschungslabor, München, Germany<br />

: LDR brachytherapy can modulate wound healing<br />

avoiding hyperproliferation and benign stenosis <strong>of</strong> endogenous tubular<br />

structures such as bile duct or urethra. Till now, however, there is no<br />

suited applicator available. The aim <strong>of</strong> this project was to develop a<br />

new polymer based foil containing radioactive 32P which fits to the<br />

usual urethra catheter or bile duct stent, but would be also suitable<br />

for similar other applications.<br />

: Polymer foils filled with up to <strong>10</strong>% 31P have<br />

been produced and tested for their radiation resistance during<br />

neutron activation <strong>of</strong> 31P to 32P, washout behavior and dose<br />

distribution. The therapeutic range <strong>of</strong> the pure electron emitter 32P<br />

(Emax = 1.7 MeV, T1/2 = 14.3 d) is known to be only a few millimeters<br />

delivering minimal dose to the healthy tissue surrounding the treated<br />

stenosis. Measured dose distributions were confirmed by Geant4<br />

simulation. Within a feasibility study on rabbits and swine, a benign<br />

stenosis was induced endoscopically by laser or heat in the urethra<br />

and the common bile duct, respectively. After activation radioactive<br />

32Pfoils were wrapped around and fixed on usual implants (catheter,<br />

stent), and inserted after balloon dilatation to locally irradiate the<br />

wounded stenosis tissue. For radiation protection, a <strong>10</strong> mm thick<br />

plexiglass enclosure <strong>of</strong> the implants was sufficient.<br />

: The novel radioactive 32Pfoil allows for the usual stent or<br />

catheter application with additional LDRbrachytherapy to prevent<br />

stenosis formation. Animal tests applying 0, 15 and 30 Gy within 7<br />

days have not shown adverse dose effects in histology <strong>of</strong> the target<br />

tissue, but dose finding studies have to be made. Handling and<br />

radiation protection was found to be very easy, and no radioactive<br />

contamination has been measured.<br />

: This newly developed 32Pfoil <strong>of</strong>fers a simple and save<br />

way to irradiate very precisely tissue with a dose up to some 60 Gy,<br />

therefore after animal studies now clinical tests for the urethra are in<br />

preparation. These flexible and thin radioactive foils can be applied in<br />

a lot more cases, where hyperproliferation causes problems, and even<br />

in radiobiological experiments. To cover a wider dose range, for<br />

example to irradiate malign proliferation, foils containing 192Ir are<br />

under development.<br />

PO398<br />

RADIOACTIVITY SEEDS INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY TREATING<br />

MALIGNANT SALIVARY GLAND TUMORS<br />

J. Zhang 1 , L. Zheng 1 , M.W. Huang 1 , L.F. Jia 1 , Y. Shi 1 , G.Y. Yu 1 , J.G.<br />

Zhang 1<br />

1<br />

The Stomotology School and Hospital <strong>of</strong> Peking University, Oral and<br />

Maxill<strong>of</strong>acial Surgery Department, Beijing, China<br />

: To detect the efficacy <strong>of</strong> radioactive seeds<br />

implanting treating malignant salivary gland tumors.<br />

: Fortythree patients with malignant salivary<br />

gland tumors <strong>of</strong> head neck were treated at Peking University<br />

stomatologic hospital with radioactivity seeds brachytherapy between<br />

the years 2001 and 2008. These patients were implanted <strong>12</strong>5I with<br />

dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>0160Gy. The treatment response, local control rate and<br />

survive rate were evaluated and the adverse <strong>events</strong> were observed.<br />

: Tumors <strong>of</strong> twentynine patients were got complete<br />

remission(CR), tumors <strong>of</strong> seven patients were partial remission(PR),<br />

the response rate was 83.7%. The patients were followed up 848<br />

months (median 21 months), local control rate was 79%, total survival<br />

rate was 76.7%. No serious side radiotherapeutic effect was observed.<br />

: Radioactivity seeds interstitial brachytherapy is an<br />

effective form <strong>of</strong> treatment for patients with unresectable malignant<br />

salivary gland tumors.<br />

PO399<br />

HDR INTENSTINAL BRACHYTERAPY AS A SALVAGE TREATMENT IN<br />

RECTAL ADENOCARCINOMA PATIENTS<br />

T. Filipowski 1 , W. Markiewicz 2 , D.E. Kazberuk 1 , A. SzmigielTrzcinska 1 ,<br />

M. Niksa 1 , B. PancewiczJanczuk 3 , W. Nowik 3<br />

1<br />

Comprehensive Cancer Center Bialystok, Radiation Oncology,<br />

Bialystok, Poland<br />

2<br />

Comprehensive Cancer Center Bialystok, Oncological Surgery,<br />

Bialystok, Poland<br />

3<br />

Comprehensive Cancer Center Bialystok, Physics, Bialystok, Poland<br />

: To analyze efficacy and toxicity pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> salvage<br />

intenstinal brachytherapy HDR in rectal Anenocarcinoma patients<br />

after tumorectomy who refused or was not classified to the radical<br />

resection.<br />

: Between April 2009 and July 2011, 8 patients<br />

(pts) with rectal Adenocarinoma underwent conformal HDR<br />

brachytherapy (HDRBRT) with a temporary intenstinal implant ( 35<br />

cathetters) The mean age <strong>of</strong> pts was 71years,. 6 <strong>of</strong> patients received<br />

30 Gy in 5 days 3 Gy per fraction twice daily, one <strong>of</strong> patients received<br />

24 Gy in 4 days, 4 Gy per fraction, one <strong>of</strong> the patient received <strong>10</strong> Gy<br />

single fraction. The plan was prepared in 3D based on CT and<br />

Oncentra Master plan and PLATO planning s<strong>of</strong>tware. Dose volume<br />

constraints for this planning system included for target: V <strong>10</strong>0,<br />

V150,V200, D90. Patient were monitored weekly during radiotherapy<br />

and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 15 months after the end <strong>of</strong> treatment and then at<br />

three months interval. Followup visit included clinical and surgical<br />

examination, radiology exam (Ultrasoun <strong>of</strong> abdomen and liver and<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 159<br />

chest Xray) and CEA value assesment. The acute toxicities were<br />

graded according to the EORTC/RTOG scales.<br />

: Median follow up was 8 months (153) with <strong>10</strong>0% diseasefree<br />

survival rate. The most common symptoms were: pain, swelling,<br />

bleeding, thin stool, rectal urgency, frequency and tenesmus and<br />

acute proctitis was observed. 20 % grade 4 acute toxicities were<br />

recorded. However overall survival data need longer followup.<br />

: HDRBRT is a valid anal sphincter sparing treatment<br />

modality for selected patients. HDRBRT has an important role in<br />

achieving dose escalation for some patients. The treatment was well<br />

tolerated by majority <strong>of</strong> patients with acceptable degree <strong>of</strong> acute<br />

toxicities. Overall survival data need longer followup.<br />

PO400<br />

THE CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF SURFACE HDR LEIPZIG APPLICATORS<br />

I. Ozbay 1 , S. Kucucuk 2 , M. Fayda 2 , B. Serarslan 2 , A. Kizir 2 , E.N. Oral 2 ,<br />

E.K. Saglam 2 , A. Fathalizadeh 2 , G. Kemikler 1 , I. Aslay 2<br />

1<br />

Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Medical Physics, Istanbul,<br />

Turkey<br />

2<br />

Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Radiation Oncology, Istanbul,<br />

Turkey<br />

: The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is to evaluate our initial<br />

experience with surface Leipzig applicators <strong>of</strong> microSelectronHDR<br />

afterloader (Nucletron).<br />

: Between January 2011 and January 20<strong>12</strong>, 15<br />

patients with 18 lesions were treated with Leipzig applicators at our<br />

institution. The median age <strong>of</strong> patients was 69 (2690). Skin tumors<br />

were the main indication for treatment with 7 basal cell cancer (BCC),<br />

6 squamous cell cancer (SCC), 3 Kaposi’s sarcoma, one keloid and one<br />

hemangioma cases treated. Another patient was treated for two<br />

buccal mucosa tumors. Initial management was incisional biopsy in 13<br />

cases, excision with positive margins in 3 cases, total excision before<br />

RT in one keloid case and one lip hemangioma case with no prior<br />

treatment. Five lesions were treated previously. One keloid case was<br />

removed three years prior, one skin cancer case had cryotherapy,<br />

another skin lesion was externally irradiated six months previously and<br />

two oral cavity lesions were externally irradiated prior to using the<br />

surface applicator. All <strong>of</strong> the lesions were on the head except two<br />

cases <strong>of</strong> Kaposi’s sarcoma involving the toes. In <strong>12</strong> cases, the patients<br />

were treated with 3 fractions per week, in 4 cases, 5 fractions per<br />

week, one case used 2 fractions per week, and one <strong>of</strong> the keloid cases<br />

was treated BID in three consecutive days. The characteristics <strong>of</strong> the<br />

treatments are provided in the table. The typical use <strong>of</strong> the Leipzig<br />

applicator is shown (see photo).<br />

Median MinMax<br />

Age 69 2690<br />

Size <strong>of</strong> the lesion (cm) 1.4 0.52.5<br />

Leipzig applicator dimension (cm) 2 13<br />

Reference depth (mm) 3 35<br />

Dose per fraction (Gy) 4 2.5<strong>10</strong><br />

Number <strong>of</strong> fractions <strong>10</strong> 314<br />

Total dose (Gy) 37 967.5<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> fraction per week 3 (mode) 25<br />

Followup (months) 3 111<br />

<br />

: All <strong>of</strong> the patients tolerated the treatment very well. The<br />

median followup time was 3 (111) months. Four patients had grade 2<br />

acute mucositis, two patients had grade 1 skin reactions and one<br />

patient had grade 3 mucositis treated with topical steroids. Most <strong>of</strong><br />

the acute reactions resolved within the first month. One case<br />

experienced hypopigmentation and the patient with two oral cavity<br />

lesions developed necrotic tissue on the treated areas. The overall<br />

tumor response was 95% for patients with gross tumors at a six week<br />

followup.<br />

: The treating <strong>of</strong> small targets especially on the face is<br />

associated with some difficulties. Cosmetic results in this area are <strong>of</strong><br />

great importance. The dosimetric uncertainties <strong>of</strong> the small fields<br />

should be managed individually especially during external beam<br />

radiation with electrons. The longer treatment time is not easily<br />

tolerated by elderly patients with multiple comorbidities. The surface<br />

Leipzig applicators <strong>of</strong> microSelectronHDR afterloader may help to<br />

irradiate superficial small tumors located on the skin and mucosal<br />

surfaces by using larger fraction sizes allowing for the use <strong>of</strong> fewer<br />

fractions. Long term followup is needed to evaluate long term local<br />

control and cosmetic results.<br />

PO401<br />

MRIBASED RECTAL APPLICATOR RECONSTRUCTION IN HDR RECTAL<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

A. BeikiArdakani 1 , A. Simeonov 1 , R. Wong 2 , J. Jezioranski 1<br />

1 Princess Margaret Hospital, Radiation Physics, Toronto, Canada<br />

2 Princess Margaret Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada<br />

: To date, only CT images are used for treatment<br />

planning in High Dose Rate (HDR) rectal <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> (BT). The<br />

major challenge <strong>of</strong> MRIbased HDR rectal BT has been the lack <strong>of</strong><br />

adequate visualization <strong>of</strong> the HDR applicator and catheter.<br />

Consequently, CT is generally used for catheter reconstruction in the<br />

treatment planning system. One disadvantage <strong>of</strong> using two imaging<br />

modalities MR for target delineation and CT for catheter<br />

reconstruction is patient motion between the two scans, which may<br />

create a large uncertainty in image fusion. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study<br />

was to assess the performance <strong>of</strong> a 3D volumetric interpolated breath<br />

hold sequence (VIBE) for both target delineation and catheter<br />

reconstruction in HDR rectal BT.<br />

: Recently, the 3D VIBE sequence (a modified<br />

fast 3D gradientecho sequence), has been used to acquire T1<br />

weighted images in a clinical wholebody MRI. This sequence may<br />

provide isotropic or nearisotropic resolution in three dimensions,<br />

while preserving wide anatomic coverage in a short acquisition time.<br />

Motion artifacts and accompanying partial volume averaging effects<br />

are also reduced by the rapid data acquisition, resulting in high<br />

quality 3D MR images. We obtained T1weighted images through the<br />

rectal applicator using the VIBE sequence and then used Nucletron<br />

reconstruction s<strong>of</strong>tware to generate 3D MR images <strong>of</strong> the HDR rectal<br />

applicator. MRI was performed on a 3T MR unit (Siemens Medical<br />

Solutions) using a phasedarray body coil. T1weighted images <strong>of</strong> the<br />

rectal applicator in both phantom and a test patient were obtained<br />

using VIBE (TR/TE, 4.75/2.53; flip angle, 15°; field <strong>of</strong> view, 400 mm;<br />

slice thickness, 3 mm; section gap, 0–0.5 mm; number <strong>of</strong> slices, 30–40;<br />

image matrix, 256 [interpolation, 5<strong>12</strong>]; bandwidth, 490 Hz/pixel; 1<br />

signal acquisition; scanning time, 60 seconds). Using the 3D VIBE<br />

sequence we were able to not only visualize the tumor and Organs at<br />

Risk (OARs) but also the rectal applicator as well as the catheter<br />

channels for purposes <strong>of</strong> treatment planning (Fig 1). The validity <strong>of</strong><br />

the 3D VIBE sequence was evaluated using T2 weighted MR and CT<br />

images in a specially designed phantom as well as a test patent.


S160 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Fig 1: Left: T2 vs 3D VIBE, minimal shift was observed for central<br />

channel in applicator for test patient. right; CT vs 3D VIBE with<br />

horizontal frequency encoding causing 1mm applicator shift to right<br />

: The 3D VIBE sequence introduces a maximum 1 mm chemical<br />

shift <strong>of</strong> the Rectal Applicator relative to surrounding s<strong>of</strong>t tissue<br />

equivalent material (both in phantom and test patient) in the<br />

direction <strong>of</strong> frequency encoding relative to CT and T2 weight MR<br />

images. This shift can be corrected during catheter reconstruction or<br />

reduced by using a higher bandwidth acquisition.<br />

: Our study has shown that the 3D VIBE sequence can be<br />

used for both target delineation and catheter reconstruction for<br />

treatment planning <strong>of</strong> HDR rectal BT, with a maximum spatial<br />

uncertainty <strong>of</strong> 1mm.<br />

PO402<br />

HDR BRACHYTHERAPY GIVES RAPID TUMOR RESPONSE AND LOW<br />

NORMAL TISSUE TOXICITY IN NONMELANOMA SKIN CANCER OF THE<br />

FACE<br />

R. Kumar 1 , R. Hobbs 1 , A. HackerPrietz 1 , H. Quon 1 , A. Wild 1 , T. Wang 2 ,<br />

E. Armour 1 , J.M. Herman 1<br />

1<br />

The Johns Hopkins University, Radiation Oncology and Molecular<br />

Radiation Sciences, Baltimore, USA<br />

2<br />

The Johns Hopkins University, Dermatology, Baltimore, USA<br />

: Nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most<br />

common malignancy in the United States with over 2,000,000 cases<br />

diagnosed in 20<strong>10</strong>. Electron beam radiation has been historically used<br />

in poor surgical cases. In this study, we analyzed the dosimetry <strong>of</strong> HDR<br />

brachytherapy (HDR BT) vs electron beam irradiation in the treatment<br />

<strong>of</strong> NMSC <strong>of</strong> the bilateral face.<br />

: Our patient is a 66 year old male with a<br />

history <strong>of</strong> rheumatoid arthritis on chronic immunosuppression, and a<br />

long history <strong>of</strong> multiple NMSC lesions, including those on the bilateral<br />

face. Multiple biopsies and resections had been performed, but his<br />

disease was refractory to MOHS resection, topical agents, and oral<br />

agents. CT simulation was performed with immobilization achieved by<br />

an aquaplast mask. The visible lesions were marked with radioopaque<br />

wire and BB. A Freiburg® flap was applied under the mask and molded<br />

to maintain contact with the patient's skin. Catheters were inserted<br />

into the flap and connected to a remote source. The patient was<br />

treated with 400 cGy fractions <strong>of</strong> HDR BT to a total <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> fractions<br />

(total dose <strong>of</strong> 4000 cGy). A dosimetric comparison was simultaneously<br />

performed using the Pinnacle® planning system. The comparison dose<br />

was with a 6MV electron beam using a 5 mm tissue bolus to a dose <strong>of</strong><br />

55 Gy in 20 fractions (2.75 Gy/fraction). The BED<strong>10</strong>Gy was 70.13 Gy for<br />

electrons vs 56.00 Gy for brachytherapy; the BED3Gy was <strong>10</strong>5.4 Gy for<br />

electrons vs 93.33 Gy for brachy. The dose to head and neck critical<br />

structures was compared between the two treatment plans.<br />

: The patient experienced visible clinical improvement by<br />

fraction 4 <strong>of</strong> the HDR BT. Nearcomplete resolution <strong>of</strong> his bilateral<br />

cheek disease was observed by fraction 8. Treatment was completed<br />

on a 23 doses/week fractionation schedule. A treatment break <strong>of</strong> 5<br />

days was provided after fraction 4 to the patient to allow for toxicity<br />

improvement. Only grade 2 skin erythema was noted, no other acute<br />

toxicity was described. Resimulation <strong>of</strong> the patient was performed on<br />

treatment day 3 to ensure accurate patient alignment in the<br />

immobilization system. Less than 1 mm <strong>of</strong> patient motion was<br />

observed.<br />

Electron (Gy) HDR Brachy (Gy)<br />

Left GTV 51.30 51.00 (avg)<br />

Right GTV 52.87 54.37 (avg)<br />

Brain 40.28 17.74 (max)<br />

Thyroid 3.30 1.<strong>12</strong> (avg)<br />

Mandible 32.16 20.80 (max)<br />

Oral cavity 44.42 20.<strong>10</strong> (max)<br />

Left Parotid 26.07 16.99 (avg)<br />

(Right parotid previously excised)<br />

Left Globe 52.99 15.94 (max)<br />

Right Globe 1.29 8.63 (max)<br />

Left Cochlea 0.97 7.78 (avg)<br />

Right Cochlea 0.93 8.06 (max)<br />

Left masseter 59.45 25.64 (max)<br />

Right masseter 59.57 29.23 (max)<br />

: The clinical response <strong>of</strong> our patient was dramatic (image<br />

below). The potential dosimetric advantage <strong>of</strong> this technique over<br />

electron beam irradiation is significant in terms <strong>of</strong> both acute and late<br />

radiation toxicity, especially when the relatively higher BED <strong>of</strong> the<br />

electron plan is noted. Additionally, the fractionation <strong>of</strong> the HDR BT<br />

method may theoretically allow for increased normal tissue repair.<br />

However, longterm follow up is necessary to address the potential<br />

late toxicity <strong>of</strong> this treatment method, and the comparison <strong>of</strong> HDR BT<br />

to electron beam irradiation should be addressed prospectively.<br />

PO403<br />

ENDOSCOPIC GUIDED BRACHYTHERAPY (EGBT)FOR SINONASAL AND<br />

NASOPHARYNGEAL RECURRENCES<br />

F. Bussu 1 , L. Tagliaferri 2 , M. Rigante 1 , F. Miccichè 2 , N. Dinapoli 2 , R.<br />

Autorino 2 , G. Almadori 1 , G. Paludetti 1 , V. Valentini 1 , G. Kovacs 1<br />

1<br />

Università Cattolica del Sacro CuorePoliclinico A. Gemelli,<br />

Otorhinolaryngology, Rome, Italy<br />

2<br />

Università Cattolica del Sacro CuorePoliclinico A. Gemelli,<br />

Radiotherapy, Rome, Italy<br />

: In recurrences <strong>of</strong> a nasopharyngeal or sinonasal<br />

malignancy after a full course <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy second clinically<br />

effective dose <strong>of</strong> external beam radiotherapy leads to high toxicity<br />

rates. <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> may improve the outcome with a more<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 161<br />

conformed dose. Endoscopic surgery <strong>of</strong>fers advantages as it is<br />

minimally invasive, however, still not fully validated, especially for<br />

recurrences, and exceptionable for issues about radicality. In this<br />

setting the possibility to deliver an adjuvant irradiation by catheters<br />

positioned on the high risk areas <strong>of</strong> the surgical bed under direct<br />

endoscopic vision may definitely increase the chances for local<br />

control. In the present work we evaluate the outcome <strong>of</strong> combined<br />

endoscopic surgery and perioperative brachytherapy.<br />

: Local recurrences following a full course <strong>of</strong><br />

radiotherapy were resected by an endoscopic approach and plastic<br />

tubes were intraoperatively fixed to the surgical bed. In the<br />

nasopharyngeal cases we stabilized the blind tubes by suturing them<br />

on the nasal packing and the 2ways catheters by through stitches on<br />

the cartilaginous septum. In sinonasal cases we stabilized the blind<br />

catheters passing them through tunnels drilled in the maxillary bone,<br />

pushing them to adhere to the target area by nasal packing under<br />

endoscopic vision and then suturing them to the skin. The irradiation<br />

dose was 30 Gy in <strong>12</strong> fractions, 2.5 Gy each, twice a day, in 6 days.<br />

The nasal packing and the catheters were removed at the end <strong>of</strong><br />

irradiation course. We calculated the overall and relapse free survival<br />

starting from the day <strong>of</strong> the procedure.<br />

: We enrolled 3 patients with recurrences <strong>of</strong> sinonasal<br />

malignancies (2 adenocarcinomas, 1 adenoidcystic carcinoma),<br />

already treated by surgery and adjuvant irradiation, and 2 patients<br />

with recurrent nasopharyngeal SCC, both treated by<br />

chemoradiotherapy (70 Gy+ cis q21). Median follow up was 8 months.<br />

4 out <strong>of</strong> 5 patients are still alive with no evidence <strong>of</strong> disease. 1 <strong>of</strong><br />

them (nasopharyngeal SCC) is dead for massive bleeding 2 months<br />

after the procedure. In 1 case (recurrence <strong>of</strong> an adenoid cystic<br />

carcinoma <strong>of</strong> the coana) we had a transient deficit <strong>of</strong> the VI cranial<br />

nerve, totally solved after 2 weeks <strong>of</strong> steroids.<br />

: Combination <strong>of</strong> the endoscopic approach for removal <strong>of</strong><br />

recurrence and perioperative brachytherapy seems to be an effective<br />

option for treating local recurrences. The morbidity <strong>of</strong> the endoscopic<br />

approach is minimal, perioperative radiation can start the day after.<br />

The endoscopic approach allows an optimal catheter positioning with<br />

an extraordinary exposure and anatomic detail; on the other hand the<br />

combination with brachytherapy may lead to enlarge the indications<br />

for an endoscopic approach in the salvage <strong>of</strong> sinonasal recurrences.<br />

PO404<br />

VOXELIZED DOSERESPONSE STUDY IN HIGH DOSE RATE (HDR) 192IR<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY FOR RECTAL CANCER<br />

R.F. Hobbs 1 , Y. Le 1 , E.P. Armour 1 , J. Efron 2 , N. Azad 3 , L. Diaz 3 , H.<br />

Qiu 3 , G. Sgouros 4 , S.L. Gearhart 2 , J.M. Herman 1<br />

1 Johns Hopkins University, Radiation Oncology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />

2 Johns Hopkins University, Surgery, Baltimore MD, USA<br />

3 Johns Hopkins University, Oncology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />

4 Johns Hopkins University, Radiology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />

: Doseresponse studies in radiation therapy are<br />

typically using single response values for tumors across ensembles <strong>of</strong><br />

tumors. Using the HDR treatment plan dose grid and voxelized pre<br />

and posttherapy FDGPET images, we show correlations between<br />

voxelized dose and FDG uptake response in individual tumors.<br />

: Five patients were treated for localized<br />

rectal cancer using 192 Ir high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy in<br />

conjunction with surgery. FDGPET images were acquired before HDR<br />

therapy and 68 weeks after treatment (prior to surgery). Treatment<br />

planning was done on a commercial workstation and the dose grid was<br />

calculated. The two PETs and the treatment dose grid were registered<br />

to each other. The difference in PET SUV values before and after HDR<br />

was plotted versus absorbed radiation dose for each voxel (left<br />

figure). The voxels were then separated into bins for every 400 cGy <strong>of</strong><br />

absorbed dose and the bin average values plotted similarly (right<br />

figure)<br />

: Four <strong>of</strong> the five patients showed a significant positive<br />

correlation (R 2 = 0.18, 0.70, 0.81, 0.82 and 0.89, respectively)<br />

between PET uptake difference in the targeted region and the<br />

absorbed dose for the binned voxels (see figure).<br />

: By considering larger ensembles <strong>of</strong> voxels, such as <strong>org</strong>an<br />

average absorbed dose or the dose bins considered here, valuable<br />

information may be obtained. The doseresponse correlations as<br />

measured by FDGPET difference potentially underlines the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> FDGPET as a measure <strong>of</strong> response, as well as the value<br />

<strong>of</strong> voxelized information.<br />

PO405<br />

EARLY INTERVENTION WITH SELECTIVE INTERNAL RADIATION THERAPY<br />

(SIRT) IMPROVES SURVIVAL AND LOCAL/SYSTEMIC OPTIONS<br />

N. Sharma 1 , E.M. Nichols 1 , S. Grabowski 1 , P. Amin 1 , M. Gar<strong>of</strong>alo 1 , A.<br />

Hanlon 2 , N. Hanna 3 , R. Patel 4 , M. Horiba 5 , F. Moeslein 4<br />

1 University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, Radiation Oncology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />

2 University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, Biostatistics, Baltimore MD, USA<br />

3 University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, Surgical Oncology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />

4 University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, Interventional Radiology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />

5 University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, Medical Oncology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />

: Hepatic brachytherapy with selective internal<br />

radiation therapy (SIRT) using Y90 resin microspheres (SIRSpheres)<br />

has been extensively described in the treatment <strong>of</strong> metastatic<br />

colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, its application as a treatment<br />

modality in other tumor types has been documented primarily through<br />

small case series and data regarding optimal timing <strong>of</strong> treatment and<br />

patient selection are still emerging. We reviewed our large single<br />

institutional experience with this modality in patients with adequate<br />

staging and multidisciplinary oncologic management.<br />

: Records <strong>of</strong> all patients undergoing SIRT after<br />

determination <strong>of</strong> appropriate eligibility by our multidisciplinary<br />

hepatobiliary tumor board between 3/2002 4/2011 were reviewed on<br />

an IRB approved protocol. Appropriate laboratory and imaging workup<br />

was performed to determine liver function, tumor burden and extent<br />

<strong>of</strong> extrahepatic disease. Hepatic angiography and macroaggregated<br />

albumin perfusion scans were performed to assess liver anatomy and<br />

lung shunting. Meticulous coil embolization <strong>of</strong> collateral vesselsat<br />

risk was performed. Patients were typically treated with initial<br />

infusion to the hepatic lobe with more extensive disease followed by<br />

treatment to the contralateral lobe 34 weeks later using an<br />

individualized dose <strong>of</strong> Y90. Followup imaging was performed 3<br />

months later and systemic therapy was as per the treating medical<br />

oncologist. Uni and multivariable statistical analyses were<br />

performed to determine variables associated with OS.<br />

: 1<strong>12</strong> patients with complete data were evaluated with the<br />

following tumor types: Colorectal cancer (N=64, 57%), hepatocellular<br />

(N=9), esophageal (N=7), neuroendocrine (N=6), breast (N=5) and<br />

other (N=21). Mean patient age was 59 (<strong>12</strong>.6), 58 (11.0) for CRC<br />

cancer patients. Median OS for the entire cohort was 29 months from<br />

initial diagnosis and 8 months from date <strong>of</strong> 1st Y90 treatment. Log<br />

Rank analysis demonstrated rate <strong>of</strong> death in patients with ≥5 lesions<br />

was twice that in patients with


S162 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

survival and allows, more importantly, for more extensive systemic<br />

management through delivery <strong>of</strong> more chemotherapy cycles.<br />

PO406<br />

NON MELANOMA SKIN CANCER TREATED WITH SUPERFICIAL<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY (BQT) OF HIGH DOSE RATE (HDR) WITH LEIPZIG OR<br />

MOULD<br />

M. VillavicencioQueijeiro 1 , B.H.Y. Bautista Hernandez Yicel 1 , M.M.J.<br />

Montoya Monterrubio Juan 1 , L.C.P. Lujan Castilla Pomponio 1 , F.M.S.<br />

Fuentes Mariles Sonia 1 , R.V.D. Ruesga Vazquez Daniel 1<br />

1<br />

Hospital General de Mexico (Goverment), Département de Radio<br />

Oncologie, DF, Mexico<br />

: : Non melanoma skin cancer is one<br />

<strong>of</strong> five causes <strong>of</strong> dead in men and women like the result <strong>of</strong> the<br />

epidemiological change in the world<br />

: To compare the local control in CPNM with superficial<br />

brachytherapy (BQT) <strong>of</strong> high dose rate (HDR) with Leipzig or mould.<br />

: Retrospective research in 98 patients with<br />

CPNM in head and neck area, treated only with BQT, superficial HDR,<br />

in the BQT Department <strong>of</strong> the Radiotherapy Service in Hospital<br />

General de Mexico from April 1 st 2005 to December 31 st 2011.<br />

Patients were divided into 5 nonhomogeneus groups (nose, eye, face,<br />

hand and ear). In the table 1 are the results <strong>of</strong> the different<br />

localizations and the type <strong>of</strong> applicator.<br />

In all the cases the prescribed dose was 5064cGy in <strong>12</strong> fractions, 3<br />

times a week (Monday, Wednesday and Friday) for 4 weeks. In the<br />

applicator's choice the type <strong>of</strong> surface was essential. In homogeneus<br />

surfaces, Leipzig applicators were used while in the inhomogeneus<br />

surface the mould applicator was chosen to guarantee the dose<br />

prescription.<br />

: It was found that in the 5 groups the local control is similar<br />

with the 2 types <strong>of</strong> applicators, except for the external ear canal in<br />

which the local failure is presented in up to 20%.<br />

Table 1. Caracteristics <strong>of</strong> the Group in the differents areas <strong>of</strong><br />

treatment. Hospital General de Mexico from April 1st 2005 to<br />

December 31st 2011<br />

Baso: Basocelular carcinoma, Squam: Squamous carcinoma. * The time<br />

<strong>of</strong> follow are in months<br />

: In CPNM head and neck area local control is up to 95%<br />

with the superficial brachytherapy (BQT) use <strong>of</strong> high dose rate (HDR).<br />

The surface type must be taken into account in the applicators choice<br />

(Leipzig or mould). The late toxicity percentage (hypopigmentation)<br />

was lowest with Leipzig than with mould. Specially the follow <strong>of</strong> the<br />

patients it´s difficult for the age and the conditions <strong>of</strong> them, so we<br />

have problems with the follow in the time. The superficial BQT could<br />

be an option for the patients with CPNM in stages I and II, with good<br />

results in local control and cosmetic results.<br />

PO407<br />

CTGUIDED INTERSTITIAL HDRBRT FOR RECURRENT MALIGNANT<br />

GLIOMAS: FIFTEEN YEARS SINGLE INSTITUTE EXPERIENCE<br />

N. Tselis 1 , C. Kolotas 2 , G. Birn 3 , E. Archavlis 3 , G. Chatzikonstantinou 4 ,<br />

E. Zoga 4 , T. Papavasileiou 4 , B. Rogge 5 , D. Baltas 5 , N. Zamboglou 4<br />

1<br />

Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Offenbach am Main, Germany<br />

2<br />

Hirslanden Clinic, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Aarau, Switzerland<br />

3<br />

Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Department <strong>of</strong> Neurosurgery, Offenbach,<br />

Germany<br />

4<br />

Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Offenbach, Germany<br />

5<br />

Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics and<br />

Engineering, Offenbach, Germany<br />

<br />

To assess the efficacy <strong>of</strong> computed tomography<br />

(CT)guided interstitial highdoserate (HDR) <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> (BRT) in<br />

the local treatment <strong>of</strong> recurrent malignant gliomas.<br />

: Between January 1995 and December 20<strong>10</strong>,<br />

179 consecutive patients were treated for recurrent malignant<br />

gliomas located within previously irradiated volumes. Sixtyseven<br />

patients were female and 1<strong>12</strong> male. Of those, <strong>12</strong>6 patients had an<br />

initial diagnosis <strong>of</strong> glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and 53 a non<br />

glioblastoma histologic primary (13 astrocytoma grade II and 40<br />

astrocytoma grade III) which transformed into a higher grade glioma<br />

at recurrence. In all patients primary treatment consisted <strong>of</strong> surgery<br />

and postoperative external radiotherapy up to 60 Gy. Adjuvant<br />

chemotherapy was administered in 1<strong>10</strong> (61.4 %) patients.<br />

<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> was performed for inoperable recurrent disease with<br />

progression under palliative chemotherapy. The median implanted<br />

tumour volume was 49 cm 3 (2207 cm 3 ) for primary GBM (n=<strong>12</strong>6), 46<br />

cm 3 (<strong>10</strong>1<strong>10</strong> cm 3 ) for initial nonglioblastoma recurring as confirmed<br />

glioma grade IV (n= 25) and 29 cm 3 (6200 cm 3 ) for recurrences<br />

presented as astrocytoma grade III (n= 28). The interstitial HDRBRT<br />

was performed using CTguided catheter implantation under local<br />

anesthesia and delivered a median dose <strong>of</strong> 40 Gy at twicedaily<br />

fractions <strong>of</strong> 5.0 Gy to a CTbased planned volume.<br />

: After a median followup <strong>of</strong> 8.8 months, three (1.6 %)<br />

patients were alive. The median postBRT survival was 37.7 weeks for<br />

primary GBM, 42.5 weeks for initial nonglioblastoma recurring as<br />

glioma grade IV, and 46.1 weeks for astrocytoma grade III. The<br />

corresponding median survival from diagnosis was 82.4 weeks, 53.5<br />

months, and 54.8 months, respectively. Seven out <strong>of</strong> 179 (3.9 %)<br />

patients experienced symptomatic radiation necrosis and 3 (1.6 %)<br />

bacterial meningitis. In addition, there were 4 (2.2 %) cases <strong>of</strong><br />

intracerebral hemorrhages, one (0.5 %) <strong>of</strong> fatal extend. No other<br />

procedurerelated deaths occurred.<br />

: For patients with inoperable recurrences <strong>of</strong> malignant<br />

gliomas within previously irradiated volumes, CTguided interstitial<br />

HDRBRT is a feasible and effective additional palliative treatment<br />

option.<br />

PO408<br />

HIGH DOSE RATE 3DIMENSIONAL TOPOGRAPHIC APPLICATOR BRACHY<br />

THERAPY FOR SKIN CANCER ABOVE CLAVICLE: EARLY OUTCOMES<br />

S. Vyas 1 , R. Weinberg 2 , N. Thawani 1 , S. Mutyala 1<br />

1 Scott and White Healthcare, Radiation Oncology, Temple, USA<br />

2 Scott and White Healthcare, Radiation Physics, Temple, USA<br />

: Nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSC) accounts for<br />

nearly half <strong>of</strong> all cancers in the US with an estimated incidence <strong>of</strong> 2<br />

million new cases/year. Surgery is the treatment <strong>of</strong> choice for most<br />

sites. Radiation is recommended as frontline therapy for Head and<br />

Neck (HN) skin cancers which has poor functional and cosmetic<br />

outcomes after surgical excision with negative margins. External beam<br />

radiation leads to inaccurate dosimetry and non homogeneity<br />

secondary to skin surface complexity. <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> is the most<br />

conformal form <strong>of</strong> radiation. There are few reports in published<br />

literature for use <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy for skin cancers. We present our<br />

single institution experience for feasibility, acute toxicity and early<br />

outcomes <strong>of</strong> definitive treatment <strong>of</strong> skin cancers in the head and neck<br />

using 3dimensional Topographic Applicator <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> (3TAB).<br />

: Patients with localized, nonmetastatic,<br />

NMSC above clavicle were treated with customized thermoplastic<br />

masks molded to the skin contour and either H.A.M. (Mick Radio<br />

Nuclear Instruments, Inc.) or Freiburg flap (NucletronElekta)<br />

applicators in contact with the skin lesion(s). The number <strong>of</strong> catheters<br />

used depended on the size and location <strong>of</strong> the lesions, with a 0.51cm<br />

margin. The prescription dose was 40 Gy in 8 fractions <strong>of</strong> 5 Gy each,<br />

delivered twice a week, to a depth <strong>of</strong> approx 3mm from the skin<br />

surface. Dose calculations comprised <strong>of</strong> determining the volume<br />

receiving 90% (V90), <strong>10</strong>0% (V<strong>10</strong>0), and 135% (V135) <strong>of</strong> the prescribed<br />

dose. Treatment toxicity was recorded and graded by RTOG criteria.<br />

Patients were followed at two weeks posttreatment and then every 3<br />

months with evaluation <strong>of</strong> response to treatment as well as acute and<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 163<br />

late toxicities. Local and regional relapsefree survival was analysed<br />

after generation <strong>of</strong> Kaplan Meier curves.<br />

: A total <strong>of</strong> 81 lesions on 54 consecutive patients received 3<br />

TAB between July 20<strong>10</strong> to Dec 2011. The demographic and treatment<br />

parameters <strong>of</strong> the patients are shown in Table.<br />

PARAMETERS N=81<br />

value(%) mean median range<br />

SITE<br />

nose 26(32.1)<br />

cheek 19(23.5)<br />

ear 17(21)<br />

forehead 7(8.6)<br />

others<br />

HISTOLOGY<br />

<strong>12</strong>(14.8)<br />

basal 55(67.9)<br />

squamous 23(28.4)<br />

mixed 2(2.5)<br />

bowens<br />

STAGE<br />

1(1.2)<br />

I 68(84)<br />

II 13(16)<br />

VOL(CC)<br />

1.8 1.3 0.39.4<br />

# CATHETERS<br />

5 5 113<br />

V90 (%)<br />

70.1 83.7 38.6<strong>10</strong>0<br />

V135(%)<br />

2.3 0.2 0.0153<br />

Mean follow up was 19 weeks (median 13 weeks, range 064), and 78<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 81 lesions received the full treatment course. The complete<br />

response rate at last followup was 95%(77/81). Local failure was seen<br />

in 3.7%(3/81) and regional failure was seen in 1.2% <strong>of</strong> 81 lesions.<br />

Three patients with 7 lesions were lost to followup. The KM local<br />

relapsefree survival was 88.4% and locoregional relapsefree survival<br />

was 83.5% at 64 weeks. There were no Grade 3 or Grade 4 toxicity,<br />

49% patients had Grade 2 dermatitis and 51% had Grade 1 skin<br />

changes. There was complete resolution <strong>of</strong> skin toxicity by 3 months.<br />

One patient developed a persistent ulcer after subsequent biopsy for<br />

suspected recurrence.<br />

: 3TAB is feasible treatment for HN skin cancers, with<br />

low acute toxicity. Early outcomes show good local control and low<br />

long term toxicity, but longer follow up is warranted.<br />

PO409<br />

LOCAL EXCISION AND BRACHYTHERAPY FOR SPHINCTER PRESERVATION<br />

IN RECTAL CANCER: RESULTS ON A COHORT OF 70 PATIENTS<br />

L. Grimard 1 , H. Stern 2<br />

1<br />

The Ottawa Hospital Regional Cancer Centre, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Radiotherapy, Ottawa, Canada<br />

2<br />

Montreal Jewish General Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Surgery, Montreal,<br />

Canada<br />

: From Nov 1991 to March 2011, 70 patients (Pts)<br />

were entered in a cohort combining local excision (LE), brachytherapy<br />

(Ir192), and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for Pts at higher risk<br />

<strong>of</strong> nodal disease. Long term results are presented.<br />

: Seven Pts could not be treated as planned: 4<br />

did not have a LE, and 3 did not have Ir192. There were 4 local<br />

recurrences (LR) in this subgroup and they are excluded from this<br />

analysis. There were 63 Pts treated as intended, 34 males and 29<br />

females. Their age ranged from 33 to 88 with a median <strong>of</strong> 70, and 25<br />

Pts (40%) were over 75 years old. There were 61 adenocarcinomas (18<br />

WD, 35 MD, 6 PD, 2 unknown), one melanoma, and one<br />

neuroendocrine carcinoma. Tumor was located in the rectum in 34 Pts<br />

and at the anorectal junction in 29 Pts. Ir 192 dose was 4550 Gy<br />

(Paris System) using single or double plane implant in the tumor bed<br />

and 20 Gy after EBRT. There were 21 T1, 33 T2, and 9 T3 Pts. Two <strong>of</strong><br />

the T3 Pts had M1 disease. Ir 192 was used alone in 21 T1, and 20 T2<br />

Pts. EBRT and Ir192 was used in 13 T2 and all T3 Pts. Chemotherapy<br />

was given with EBRT in 2 T2 and 7 T3 Pts.<br />

: Following LE, margins were negative (R0) in 16 T1, 18 T2, 1<br />

T3 and positive (R1) in 5 T1, 15 T2, and 8 T3 Pts. There were 14 LR,<br />

including one in the perirectal nodes: 4 T1 (19%), 8 T2 (24%), and 2 T3<br />

(22%) Pts. There was no increased risk for T1 and T2 <strong>of</strong> LR with<br />

regards to margins. There were 8 LR in the 34 R0 Pts (23%) and 4 LR in<br />

the 20 R1 Pts (20%). There were 6 salvage surgeries in 3 T1 and 2 T2<br />

Pts: three are NED at 3, 7, <strong>10</strong> years, one is alive with disease at 3<br />

years, and 2 died <strong>of</strong> metastatic disease. Two patients required a<br />

colostomy because <strong>of</strong> radionecrosis. Two patients had significant<br />

incontinence. There were 16 deaths from disease, including the two<br />

patients expected with Stage IV, and 7 died from other causes.<br />

: This approach is promising for frail and elderly Pts at<br />

high surgical risk for a major resection. Adjuvant Ir192 is a valid<br />

alternative to major resection in some Pts with positive margins after<br />

LE.<br />

PO4<strong>10</strong><br />

TRANSLATIONAL NEOADJUVANT HIGH DOSE RATE ENDORECTAL<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY FOR RECTAL ADENOCARCINOMA<br />

J. Herman 1 , J. Efron 2 , N. Azad 3 , E. Wick 2 , E. Shin 4 , I. Kamel 5 , A.<br />

Singh 6 , L. Diaz 3 , A. HackerPrietz 1 , S. Gearhart 2<br />

1 Johns Hopkins University, Radiation Oncology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />

2 Johns Hopkins University, Surgical Oncology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />

3 Johns Hopkins University, Medical Oncology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />

4 Johns Hopkins University, Gastroeterology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />

5 Johns Hopkins University, Radiology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />

6 Johns Hopkins University, Pathology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />

: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NCRT) is<br />

the standard <strong>of</strong> care for TxN<strong>12</strong>, T34N0, rectal adenocarcinoma.<br />

Previous studies have shown improved local control and reduced<br />

toxicity with NCRT compared to adjuvant therapy. NCRT consists <strong>of</strong><br />

approximately 56 weeks <strong>of</strong> external beam radiation with concurrent<br />

5Fluorouracil. Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) has been<br />

studied in attempt to further limit dosing and toxicity to surrounding<br />

normal tissue, but length <strong>of</strong> treatment does not differ. The addition<br />

<strong>of</strong> more aggressive chemotherapy to NCRT has increased acute<br />

toxicity rates, yet failed to improve response rates. Therefore a novel<br />

approach using high dose rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDREBT)<br />

given in 4 fractions (6.5Gy/day) on a pilot study was investigated.<br />

Preliminary results <strong>of</strong> the first seven patients on protocol were<br />

reviewed.<br />

: Cases <strong>of</strong> the first 7 patients enrolled on HDR<br />

EBT pilot study, who underwent surgical resection, were reviewed. All<br />

patients had tumors 28%. Out <strong>of</strong><br />

the 7 patients, 3 had node negative disease at resection, 2 patients<br />

had 1 positive node. All patients were margin negative and 6 had<br />

sphincter preserving surgery, (other patient chose to have APR due to<br />

age). 3 <strong>of</strong> 7 patients (43%) had a pathologic complete response (pCR)<br />

<strong>of</strong> their primary tumors. Toxicity assessments showed only 1 patient<br />

with grade 3 proctitis posttherapy, all others were grade 2 or less<br />

consisting <strong>of</strong> proctitis and pain that resolved following surgery.<br />

: HDREBT is a novel approach for rectal cancer that<br />

reduces neoadjuvant treatment length, allows pts to undergo<br />

resection sooner, and shows favorable tumor response<br />

radiographically, pathologically, and biochemically. Preliminary<br />

results appear encouraging to guide future studies and assist with<br />

determining the efficacy <strong>of</strong> this modality.<br />

PO411<br />

BRACHYTHERAPY WITH IODINE <strong>12</strong>5 OR RUTHENIUM <strong>10</strong>6 FOR<br />

TREATMENT OF CHOROIDAL MELANOMAS MEASURING 57 MM IN<br />

THICKNESS


S164 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

L. Tagliaferri 1 , D. Smaniotto 1 , M.A. Blasi 2 , M. Pagliara 2 , A. Villano 2 , E.<br />

Balestrazzi 2 , L. Azario 3 , S. Luzi 1 , V. Valentini 1<br />

1<br />

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Policlinico A. Gemelli,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Rome, Italy<br />

2<br />

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Policlinico A. Gemelli,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Ophthalmology, Rome, Italy<br />

3<br />

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Policlinico A. Gemelli,<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Physics, Rome, Italy<br />

: Plaque radiotherapy is one <strong>of</strong> the most common<br />

treatment modalities for uveal melanoma and the Collaborative<br />

Ocular Melanoma Study found no significant difference between<br />

enucleation and plaque radiotherapy with respect to patient survival.<br />

The main aim <strong>of</strong> this study is compare Iodine <strong>12</strong>5 (I<strong>12</strong>5) and<br />

Ruthenium <strong>10</strong>6 (Ru<strong>10</strong>6) plaque radiotherapy for uveal melanomas<br />

measuring 57 mm in thickness with regard to treatment<br />

complications and tumor control.<br />

: Each case was evaluated at the weekly<br />

multidisciplinary meeting with ophthalmologists, radiotherapists and<br />

medical physicists. Treatment planning was performed by physicists<br />

and validated by radiotherapists and ophthalmologists. For this<br />

analysis we selected from our database, Patients with tumor thickness<br />

<strong>of</strong> 57 mm presented between February 2007 and October 20<strong>10</strong> and<br />

treated with I<strong>12</strong>5 (group A) or RU<strong>10</strong>6 plaque +/ Transpupillary<br />

thermotherapy (group B) plaque. We always prescribed respectively a<br />

dose <strong>of</strong> 85 Gy (Group A) or <strong>10</strong>0 Gy (Group B) at tumor apex The<br />

clinical data were then analyzed with regard to four outcomes <strong>of</strong><br />

radiation maculopathy, enucleation, local tumor recurrence, and<br />

metastasis.<br />

: The patieents <strong>of</strong> group A are 14 pts and group B are <strong>12</strong> pts.<br />

Clinical and ultrasound data <strong>of</strong> group A and group B were as follow:<br />

mean age (67 vs 65 years, range 4282) , mean tumor thickness (6.43<br />

vs 5.34mm, range 5.06.9), mean tumor largest basal diameter (11.85<br />

vs 11.33mm, range 7.5314.40). Mean follow was 24.2 months (range<br />

14.338.7) in group A and 30.2 months (range 7.648.3) in group B .<br />

Treatment with I<strong>12</strong>5 resulted in higher rate <strong>of</strong> radiation maculopathy<br />

(14.3% vs 8.3% respectively), lower rate <strong>of</strong> enucleation (7.1% vs 8.3%<br />

respectively), lower rate <strong>of</strong> tumor recurrence (7.1% vs 8.3%<br />

respectively), and lower rate <strong>of</strong> metastasis (0% vs 25% respectively).<br />

The differences were not significant on univariate level (P > 0.05),<br />

except for metastasis rate. The mean interval between treatment and<br />

onset <strong>of</strong> metastatic disease was 30.5 months.<br />

: The management <strong>of</strong> choroidal melanoma with a<br />

thickness <strong>of</strong> 57 mm is controversial. Iodine seems to provide higher<br />

local tumor control, while Ruthenium induces less radiation<br />

complications. Although there are several limitations to our study, we<br />

found that I<strong>12</strong>5 represents a better option in these subgroup <strong>of</strong><br />

tumors, especially for preventing metastatic disease.<br />

PO4<strong>12</strong><br />

BRACHYTHERAPY OF THE ORBIT IN YOUNG CHILDREN<br />

W. Sauerwein 1 , C. Stannard 2 , E. Biewald 3 , L. Brualla 1 , L. Lüdemann 1 ,<br />

B. Timmermann 4 , N. Bornfeld 3 , A. Wittig 5<br />

1<br />

Universitätsklinikum Essen, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Essen,<br />

Germany<br />

2<br />

Groote Schuur Hospital and University <strong>of</strong> Cape Town, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Radiation Oncology, Cape Town, South Africa<br />

3<br />

Universitätsklinikum Essen, Department <strong>of</strong> Ophthalmology, Essen,<br />

Germany<br />

4<br />

WPE gGmbH, Proton Therapy, Essen, Germany<br />

5<br />

University Hospital Marburg, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Marburg, Germany<br />

: The most common ocular tumor in the childhood<br />

is retinoblastoma. Uveal melanoma at this age is extremely rare. As<br />

the survival probability <strong>of</strong> patients drops dramatically if the tumor has<br />

invaded the sclera or the resection line <strong>of</strong> the optic nerve, or<br />

macroscopic tumor has invaded the orbit these patients are managed<br />

with radiotherapy to the orbit and (in the case <strong>of</strong> retinoblastoma)<br />

with systemic chemotherapy. External beam radiotherapy, although<br />

excellent in preventing a recurrence, interferes with growth <strong>of</strong> the<br />

orbital bones in children resulting in very poor cosmesis, thus<br />

requiring multiple surgical interventions. To avoid these<br />

complications, several techniques were used with the goal to irradiate<br />

the orbital contents, while shielding the bony orbit and eyelids.<br />

: From 1992 to 20<strong>10</strong> we saw 8 children (2 girls<br />

6 boys) in the age range from 1 to 8 years (mean 2.5 y), suffering from<br />

retinoblastoma (6 unilateral, 1 bilateral) and uveal melanoma with<br />

involvement <strong>of</strong> the orbit. In 1992, two cases were treated by HDR<br />

afterloading brachytherapy with Ir192 giving 2 daily fractions <strong>of</strong> 1.3 –<br />

2 Gy up to a total dose <strong>of</strong> 40 Gy. In 2005, one child was irradiated by<br />

protons (1 single field 4 x 2 Gy/week up to 50 Gy). Since 2007, five<br />

children received LDR brachytherapy using I<strong>12</strong>5 (technical details in<br />

Strahlenther. Onkol. 187, 322327, 2011). This treatment consists <strong>of</strong> 6<br />

trains <strong>of</strong> I<strong>12</strong>5 seeds placed around the periphery <strong>of</strong> the orbit, and a<br />

metal disc, loaded with seeds, placed beneath the eyelids.<br />

: In all cases a longterm local tumor control could be<br />

achieved. One child died 3 months after the treatment for rapidly<br />

progressive intracerebral metastases. The follow up for the other 7<br />

children is 219 years (mean 5 y). The children treated with HDR<br />

brachytherapy and proton radiotherapy had a very poor cosmetic<br />

outcome: In all <strong>of</strong> them a severe shrinking <strong>of</strong> the orbital socket and<br />

fibrosis <strong>of</strong> the lids requested plastic surgery. The bones <strong>of</strong> the mid<br />

face show an asymmetric growth, which however is less pronounced<br />

as it was in former cases irradiated by external photon beam<br />

radiotherapy. In contrast, the children after LDR brachytherapy have<br />

a normal and symmetric growing <strong>of</strong> the bones <strong>of</strong> the face. In all<br />

except one the ocular prosthesis can be worn without problems. The<br />

only patient, who may need plastic surgery in this group had a tumor<br />

infiltration <strong>of</strong> the lower lid, which had to be included in the target<br />

volume.<br />

: In the rare situation where in young children an<br />

irradiation <strong>of</strong> the orbit has to be performed, best cosmetic results and<br />

excellent tumor control can be achieved by LDR brachytherapy using<br />

I<strong>12</strong>5 implants. The irradiation should be designed in such a way as to<br />

reduce the dose to the eyelids and the growing orbit in children.<br />

External beam radiotherapy including proton irradiation should be<br />

avoided. HDR brachyterapy using Ir192 it also leads to an unfavorable<br />

dose distribution especially to the lids and cannot be recommended.<br />

PO413<br />

HDR BRACHYTHERAPY IN ADVANCED ESOPHAGEAL CANCER:<br />

IMPROVEMENT OF DYSPHAGIA IN A COHORT OF <strong>10</strong>8 PATIENTS<br />

M.L. Reisner 1 , R.Z. Grazziotin 2 , L. Morikawa 1 , H. Salmon 1 , A.A. Rosa 2 ,<br />

T.M. Carneiro 2 , I.M. Veras 2 , M.A. Ferreira 2 , C.M. Viegas 2 , C.M. Araujo 2<br />

1<br />

Clinicas Oncológicas Integradas, Radiation Oncology, Rio de Janeiro,<br />

Brazil<br />

2<br />

Instituto Nacional de CancerINCA, Radiation Oncology, Rio de<br />

Janeiro, Brazil<br />

: Most patients with esophageal cancer are<br />

inoperable at presentation and dysphagia is one <strong>of</strong> the main symptoms<br />

interfering with quality <strong>of</strong> life.<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to estimate the improvement in<br />

dysphagia and complication rate using HDR (highdoserate)<br />

brachytherapy.<br />

: Between August 1997 and July 2008, <strong>10</strong>8<br />

patients with advanced esophageal cancer underwent HDR<br />

brachytherapy with a total dose <strong>of</strong> 1500cGy in 3 fractions <strong>of</strong> 500cGy.<br />

Tumors located in upper esophagus were also eligible to<br />

brachytherapy. Tracheoesophagic fistula by bronchoscopy was<br />

considered an absolute contraindication. Dysphagia was graded as 0<br />

(absent), 1 (to solids), 2 semisolids, 3 liquids. The improvement after<br />

brachytherapy was measured in a scale <strong>of</strong> points: 1 point<br />

(improvement in 1 grade <strong>of</strong> dysfaghia) and 2 or 3 points (improvement<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2 or 3 grades, respectively).<br />

: After 8 weeks after brachytherapy, significant improvement<br />

in dysphagia was observed in 36 % <strong>of</strong> patients and 42% remained<br />

stable. An improvement <strong>of</strong> 1 point was observed in 21% patients, with<br />

an improvement <strong>of</strong> 2 and 3 points in <strong>10</strong>.5% and 4.7 % <strong>of</strong> patients,<br />

respectively.<br />

Complete clinical response by endoscopy was observed in 21%, greater<br />

than 50% response in 18%, less than 50% response in <strong>12</strong>% and disease<br />

progression in 47% <strong>of</strong> the patients.<br />

Overall, esophageal stenosis occurred in 39% <strong>of</strong> patients, bleeding in<br />

6%, and fistula in 7%. Esophageal dilatation was performed in 29% <strong>of</strong><br />

cases and prosthesis was implanted in 11%. Complications based on<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 165<br />

tumor location (upper, middle and lower esophagus) like stenosis<br />

were observed in 46.1%, 37.8% and 42.8% <strong>of</strong> patients, respectively.<br />

: <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> seems to be very effective in palliating<br />

dysphagia on those patients with esophageal advanced disease.<br />

Moreover, it is feasible even in upper esophagus.<br />

PO414<br />

A CASECONTROL STUDY OF PATIENTS WITH HEAD AND NECK<br />

SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA TREATED WITH PDR BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

A. Haddad 1 , D. Peiffert 1 , V. Harter 2 , J.F. Betala 2 , I. Buchheit 3 , P.<br />

Graff 1 , M. Lapeyre 4<br />

1<br />

Centre Alexis Vautrin, Department <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy, Vandoeuvreles<br />

Nancy, France<br />

2<br />

Centre Alexis Vautrin, Department <strong>of</strong> medical statistics,<br />

VandoeuvrelesNancy, France<br />

3<br />

Centre Alexis Vautrin, Department <strong>of</strong> physics, VandoeuvrelesNancy,<br />

France<br />

4<br />

Centre Jean Perrin, Department <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy, Clermont Ferrand,<br />

France<br />

: PDR brachytherapy combines the radiobiological<br />

benefits <strong>of</strong> lowdose rate delivery with the radioprotection and<br />

optimization advantages <strong>of</strong> HDR brachytherapy. Practice in our<br />

department has been progressively shifting away from continuous LDR<br />

Iridium 192 wires to PDR dose delivery. We set out to evaluate the local<br />

control and toxicity outcomes <strong>of</strong> this technique in patients with head<br />

and neck squamous cell carcinoma.<br />

: 36 consecutive head and neck patients<br />

treated with PDR brachytherapy were randomly matched to 72 control<br />

patients treated with LDR brachytherapy. Patients were excluded if<br />

they were previously irradiated to the same site. Patients were<br />

matched based on T stage (1/2 Vs 3/4), tumour site (oral cavity Vs<br />

oropharynx), and use <strong>of</strong> surgery and/or external beam radiotherapy as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the management strategy. Local control and the incidence <strong>of</strong><br />

s<strong>of</strong>t tissue and osteonecrosis were retrospectively evaluated and<br />

compared between the two groups.<br />

: Baseline patient and tumour characteristics were well<br />

balanced between the two groups. Male to female ratio was 3:1, and<br />

mean age was 57 yrs. Oral cavity cancers predominated at 81%.<br />

Overall Tstage distribution was 46, 44, 6 and 3% for T1, 2, 3 and 4,<br />

respectively. 75% <strong>of</strong> patients received brachytherapy postoperatively,<br />

either alone or as a boost after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT),<br />

while 14% underwent curative EBRT followed by a brachytherapy<br />

boost and 11% were treated with brachytherapy exclusively. PDR<br />

patients received a slightly lower mean dose than LDR patients, but<br />

had a slightly higher rate <strong>of</strong> R0 resections. Median followup was 59<br />

and 30 months for LDR and PDR patients, respectively. 3yr actuarial<br />

local control rates were 97 and 94% for LDR and PDR patients,<br />

respectively. Crude rates <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t tissue and osteonecrosis were 33%<br />

and 22% for LDR and PDR, respectively, although KaplanMeier<br />

estimates at 3 yrs found that this difference was not statistically<br />

significant. Dose rate however was correlated with the incidence <strong>of</strong><br />

late necrosis for both groups: each increase <strong>of</strong> 1 cGy per hour (or per<br />

pulse) was associated with a 34% increase in the relative risk <strong>of</strong> such<br />

toxicity.<br />

: We conclude that PDR brachytherapy in head and neck<br />

squamous cell carcinoma yields comparable results to LDR treatment.<br />

However, the ability to prescribe the desired dose rate and to<br />

optimize the dose distribution may result in lower complication rates.<br />

Furthermore, this technique decreases the exposure risk to medical<br />

personnel, altogether making it the technique <strong>of</strong> choice in our<br />

department.<br />

PO415<br />

LOCAL CONTROL, SURVIVAL AND COMPLICATIONS OF SOFT TISSUE<br />

SARCOMAS TREATED WITH LOW OR HIGH DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

A. Paul 1 , E. Melian 2 , M. Surucu 2 , M. Kwasny 3 , M. Shoup 4 , C. Godellas 4 ,<br />

D. Vandevender 4 , A. Sethi 2 , G. Aranha 4<br />

1<br />

Loyola University Medical Center and Rosalind Franklin University <strong>of</strong><br />

Medicine and Science, Radiation Oncology, <strong>May</strong>wood IL, USA<br />

2<br />

Loyola University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, <strong>May</strong>wood IL,<br />

USA<br />

3<br />

Northwestern University, Department <strong>of</strong> Preventive Medicine,<br />

Chicago IL, USA<br />

4 Loyola University Medical Center, Surgery, <strong>May</strong>wood IL, USA<br />

: S<strong>of</strong>t tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumors and<br />

radiation therapy has played a major role in their treatment. This<br />

retrospective analysis reviews the rates <strong>of</strong> local control, survival, and<br />

significant complications (acute and chronic) <strong>of</strong> patients who received<br />

low dose rate (LDR) or high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BRT) at<br />

our institution.<br />

: From 1993 to 2011, 33 adult (median age =<br />

58) patients with STS received LDR BRT (n= 9) or HDR (n = 24) as part<br />

<strong>of</strong> initial or salvage local treatment. All patients had radical excision<br />

with goal to remove tumor enbloc and simultaneous catheter<br />

placement. BRT was started 45 days post surgery. LDR was used from<br />

19932003 and HDR from 20042011. BRT was given with (18) or<br />

without (15) external beam radiation (EBRT). Doses for BRT alone<br />

were LDR 45 Gy or HDR 3437 Gy in <strong>10</strong> fractions given twice daily.<br />

When BRT was given with EBRT doses were LDR 1520 Gy over 4 days<br />

or HDR 13.620.4 Gy in 46 fractions given with 4550.4 Gy in 2528<br />

fractions EBRT. KaplanMeier estimates <strong>of</strong> local control (LC), overall<br />

survival (OS), and disease specific survival (DSS) are presented.<br />

Association between LC, acute severe complications (ASC;


S166 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

brachytherapy.<br />

: Regional recurrences following a full course<br />

<strong>of</strong> radiotherapy were resected by an external approach and plastic<br />

tubes were intraoperatively fixed to the surgical bed. The tubes were<br />

fixed in a grossly parallel direction to cover all the high risk areas <strong>of</strong><br />

the surgical bed, both on the tissues to irradiate, by reabsorbable<br />

stitches, and to the skin, by buttons and nylon. The irradiation started<br />

in the 3rd postoperative day. In cases with a previous dissection <strong>of</strong> the<br />

carotid to avoid the risk <strong>of</strong> a boost on the carotid wall we carefully<br />

checked the distance from the tubes by a postoperative contrast<br />

enhanced CT. The irradiation dose was 30 Gy in <strong>12</strong> fractions, 2.5 Gy<br />

each, twice a day, in 6 days. The nasal packing and the catheters<br />

were removed at the end <strong>of</strong> irradiation course. We calculated the<br />

overall and relapse free survival starting from the day <strong>of</strong> the<br />

procedure.<br />

: We enrolled 5 patients, 3 with a neck recurrence from a<br />

supraglottic SCC, 1 from a parotid dedifferentiated acinic cell<br />

carcinoma, 1 with a locoregional recurrence <strong>of</strong> hypopharyngeal SCC.<br />

All the cases with the exception <strong>of</strong> the hypopharygeal one, had<br />

already undergone a neck dissection. 3 cases had undergone primary<br />

surgery, the oher 2 (1 larynx and the hypopharynx) primary<br />

radiochemotherapy (70 Gy+ cis q21). In 3 cases, reconstructed by a<br />

microvascular free flap, the recurrence involved the skin. In 1 case a<br />

pectoralis major flap was raised to protect the carotid in a previously<br />

irradiated neck in which jugular vein, SCM muscle and spinal nerve<br />

had been sacrificed (Crile operation). Median follow up was 7 months.<br />

All the patients are still alive, 3 out <strong>of</strong> 5 with no evidence <strong>of</strong> disease.<br />

No significant acute and late morbidities were recorded.<br />

: Combination <strong>of</strong> extensive salvage surgery and<br />

perioperative brachytherapy seems to be an effective option for<br />

treating regional recurrences <strong>of</strong> head and neck malignancies. The<br />

great conformation <strong>of</strong> the dose <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy and the<br />

reconstructive surgery contribute to reduce morbidity. The main<br />

problem in this cases is to avoid boosts on the carotid wall while<br />

delivering an effective dose to the high risk area. For this aim both a<br />

rational catheter positioning and a careful dose painting maximally<br />

exploiting the possibilities <strong>of</strong>fered by the modern IMBRT are<br />

fundamental.<br />

PO417<br />

A PHASE I FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR HDR INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY<br />

USING 60CO FOR DIFFERENT SITES<br />

S. Basu 1 , A. Basu 1 , K. Ghosh 1 , S. Datta 1 , S. Mullick 1<br />

1<br />

R.G. Kar Medical College Medical College, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Radiotherapy, Kolkata, India<br />

: 60 Co60 source with similar geometric and<br />

dosimetric properties to 192 Iridium are now available. We present our<br />

experience with 60 Co HDR remote afterloading brachytherapy in<br />

interstitial implants/ surface moulds for different sites.<br />

: Patients <strong>of</strong> different sites were accrued for this<br />

phase I study to test the clinical feasibility and safety. Those included<br />

in the study had been treated with radical brachytherapy or a boost<br />

after EBRT with flexible or rigid interstitial implants or surface<br />

moulds. They had flexible or rigid implants using plastic catheters or<br />

steel needles using a Syed template respectively under general<br />

anesthesia.Skin cancer patients had surface moulds using flexible<br />

catheters fixed on thermoplastic devices. All patients then received<br />

HDR brachytherapy with the Multisource remote afterloading machine<br />

using 60 Co sources (Eckert & Ziegler BEBIG GmbH, Germany) and CT<br />

based planning in the HDR Plus s<strong>of</strong>tware v2.6. Planning parameters<br />

mandated dose prescription to CTV. Initial response, local and distant<br />

failures and toxicity were assessed every monthly for the first 3<br />

months then two monthly.<br />

: From October 20<strong>10</strong> to December 2011, 31 patients <strong>of</strong><br />

carcinoma <strong>of</strong> different sites were treated at our centre with HDR<br />

brachytherapy with interstitial implants or surface moulds with or<br />

without EBRT. The diagnoses and the dose prescription are<br />

summarized in Table 1. Till January 20<strong>12</strong> only one prostate cancer<br />

patient amongst those treated had a bone metastasis, no other<br />

locoregional failures were observed. Amongst all the skin cancer<br />

patients and 50% <strong>of</strong> the s<strong>of</strong>t tissue sarcoma patients had acute G3 skin<br />

toxicities at the 3 rd or 4 th week which resolved by 2 months. The only<br />

breast cancer patient has slight telengectasia at the end <strong>of</strong> 1 year <strong>of</strong><br />

followup.<br />

: HDR brachytherapy interstitial implants or surface moulds<br />

using 60 Co sources for different sites is clinically feasible and safe with<br />

favourable short term response and toxicity. It is also a very viable<br />

option for economically strained regions as for the half life <strong>of</strong><br />

60<br />

Cobalt. A long term larger study based on different subsites is<br />

needed to draw a conclusion though.<br />

PO418<br />

HYPOFRACTIONATED ACCELERATED CTGUIDED INTERSTITIAL HIGH<br />

DOSERATE BRACHYTHERAPY FOR LIVER MALIGNANCIES<br />

N. Tselis 1 , G. Chatzikonstantinou 1 , C. Kolotas 2 , N. Milickovic 3 , D.<br />

Baltas 3 , B. Rogge 3 , N. Zamboglou 1<br />

1<br />

Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Offenbach am Main, Germany<br />

2<br />

Hirslanden Medical Center, Institute for Radiotherapy, Aarau,<br />

Switzerland<br />

3<br />

Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics and<br />

Engineering, Offenbach am Main, Germany<br />

: To report our results <strong>of</strong> computed tomography<br />

(CT)guided interstitial (IRT) highdoserate (HDR) brachytherapy<br />

(BRT) in the local treatment <strong>of</strong> inoperable primary and secondary liver<br />

malignancies.<br />

: Between 2000 and 2009, 31 patients<br />

underwent a total <strong>of</strong> 42 BRT procedures for 36 hepatic lesions<br />

exceeding 4 cm and located adjacent to the liver hilum and bile duct<br />

bifurcation. In all patients treatment was performed for progressive or<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 167<br />

locally recurrent disease after failure <strong>of</strong> previous antitumor<br />

therapies. Eight patients (26 %) received BRT for primary tumors<br />

(hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocellular<br />

carcinoma) and 23 (74 %) for metachronous metastatic disease. The<br />

median tumor volume was 99 cm 3 (range, 461348 cm 3 ). The median<br />

age was 64 years (range, 2785 years). The HDRBRT delivered a<br />

median total physical dose <strong>of</strong> 13.0 Gy (range, 7.032.0 Gy) in twice<br />

daily fractions <strong>of</strong> median 7.0 Gy (range, 4.0<strong>10</strong>.0 Gy) in 14 patients<br />

and in oncedaily fractions <strong>of</strong> median 8.0 Gy (range, 7.014.0 Gy) in 17<br />

patients.<br />

: The median followup was 13.3 months with an overall<br />

survival rate <strong>of</strong> 66 % at one year. The overall local control (LC) was 82<br />

% at one year, 57 % at two years and 57 % at three years. The LC rate<br />

for patients with metastatic lesions was 79 %, 59 % and 59 %, and for<br />

the subgroup with primary hepatic tumors 88 %, 50 % and 50 % at one,<br />

two and three years, respectively. Seven mild and two major adverse<br />

<strong>events</strong> occurred acute in 42 procedures with no procedurerelated<br />

deaths. Mild adverse <strong>events</strong> were pain, nausea, and vomiting and<br />

were treated symptomatically. The two severe <strong>events</strong> were<br />

intraabdominal hemorrhages following catheter removal requiring<br />

blood transfusions but no invasive intervention.<br />

: Our results confirm CTguided IRTHDRBRT to be an<br />

effective modality for the palliative treatment <strong>of</strong> inoperable liver<br />

malignancies unsuitable for thermal ablation.<br />

PO419<br />

INTRAOPERATIVE HIGH DOSE RATE INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY IN<br />

THE MANAGEMENT OF SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS<br />

L. Varela Cagetti 1 , A. Polo Rubio 1 , A. Montero Luis 1 , R. Hernanz de<br />

Lucas 1 , R. Colmenares 1 , D. Perez Aguilar 2 , I. Sanchez del Campo 2 , A.<br />

Ramos Aguerri 1<br />

1 Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Radiation Oncology, Madrid, Spain<br />

2 Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Orthopedic Surgery, Madrid, Spain<br />

: In a retrospective analysis we evaluated the<br />

Ramon y Cajal Hospital experience <strong>of</strong> locoregional control, survival,<br />

and complications <strong>of</strong> highdoserate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) for s<strong>of</strong>t<br />

tissue sarcomas (STS) <strong>of</strong> the extremities, delivered in combination<br />

with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and adjuvant<br />

chemotherapy.<br />

: Between 2007 and 2011, <strong>10</strong> patients with<br />

biopsy proven STS (primary or recurrent), were managed with<br />

conservation surgery (S) and intraoperative placement <strong>of</strong> plastic tubes<br />

(11 implants) for HDR adjuvant BT delivery followed by EBRT.<br />

<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> was performed with Ir192 High Dose Rate afterloader,<br />

<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> dose calculation was based on the spatial<br />

reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the implant from a CT image set. EBRT was<br />

administered at the end <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy, once the healing process<br />

was complete. The total dose <strong>of</strong> the combination <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy<br />

and EBRT was calculated using the linearquadratic formulation<br />

(EQD2). Chemotherapy was added in high grade tumors. Descriptive<br />

statistics were calculated. A dosimetric and volumetric analysis was<br />

performed. Survival analysis was performed according to the Kaplan<br />

Meier method.<br />

: Eleven implants were performed in ten patients. Median age<br />

was 30 y. (range 13 86). Median largest tumor diameter was 6 cm<br />

(range 219 cm). T stage was as follows: T1b, 4; T2a, 1; T2b, 6. Tumor<br />

grade: I, 2; II, 4; III, 5. R0 resection was achieved in 4 patients, R1 in<br />

6 patients and R2 in 1 patient. Median number <strong>of</strong> vectors was 8 (range<br />

3 11). Median interval between S and start <strong>of</strong> irradiation was <strong>12</strong><br />

days. Chemotherapy was administered in 5 patients.<br />

Dosimetric and volumetric analysis is shown in table 1.<br />

Median Range<br />

BT Physical dose 19.8 Gy 17.5 54.0 Gy<br />

BT Dose per fraction 3.4 Gy 3 6.5 Gy<br />

BT Number <strong>of</strong> fractions 6 5 <strong>12</strong><br />

BT EQD2 21 Gy 19.5 65 Gy<br />

EBRT Physical dose 46 Gy 45 46<br />

Total EQD2 65 Gy 62 67 Gy<br />

BT Reference volume 132 cc 38 271 cc<br />

BT V150 43.9 cc 13.6 81 cc<br />

BT V200 19.6 cc 6.0 37.0 cc<br />

Median followup was 18.5 months (range 3.6 40.6 months). Three<br />

year actuarial local relapse free survival (LRFS) was 88.8%. Local<br />

relapse occurred in one patient, nodal relapse occurred in one patient<br />

and distal relapses in three patients. In relation with the status<br />

disease, in our series we found 7 patients with NED (no evidence <strong>of</strong><br />

disease), 2 patients AWD (alive with disease) and 2 patients DOD<br />

(death <strong>of</strong> disease). Wound complication Grade 3 was observed in 36 %<br />

<strong>of</strong> patients.<br />

: The integration <strong>of</strong> HDRBT in the multidisciplinary<br />

management <strong>of</strong> STS is feasible in a General Hospital. It <strong>of</strong>fers<br />

excellent local tumour control with an acceptable rate <strong>of</strong><br />

complications. Further followup is required to confirm our long term<br />

results.<br />

PO420<br />

IMAGEGUIDED INTERSTITIAL HDRBRACHYTHERAPY IN THE LOCAL<br />

TREATMENT OF INTRATHORACIC MALIGNANCIES<br />

N. Tselis 1 , K. Ferentinos 1 , C. Kolotas 2 , J. Schirren 3 , D. Baltas 4 , H.<br />

Ackermann 5 , N. Zamboglou 1<br />

1<br />

Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />

Offenbach am Main, Germany<br />

2<br />

Hirslanden Medical Center, Institute for Radiotherapy, Aarau,<br />

Switzerland<br />

3<br />

Horst Schmidt Kliniken, Department <strong>of</strong> Thoracic Surgery, Wiesbaden,<br />

Germany<br />

4<br />

Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics and<br />

Engineering, Offenbach am Main, Germany<br />

5<br />

J.W. Goethe University <strong>of</strong> Frankfurt, Institute <strong>of</strong> Biostatistics,<br />

Frankfurt, Germany<br />

: Imageguided interstitial (IRT) brachytherapy<br />

(BRT) is an effective therapeutic option as part <strong>of</strong> a multimodal<br />

approach to the treatment <strong>of</strong> intrathoracic tumors. In this study we<br />

report our results <strong>of</strong> computed tomography (CT)guided IRT highdose<br />

rate (HDR) BRT in the local treatment <strong>of</strong> inoperable primary and<br />

secondary intrathoracic malignancies<br />

: Between January 1997 and December 20<strong>10</strong>,<br />

65 consecutive patients underwent a total <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong>2 interventional<br />

procedures for a total <strong>of</strong> 77 lesions. All patients were not surgical<br />

candidates and BRT was performed for progressive or locally recurrent<br />

disease after failure <strong>of</strong> previous antitumor therapies. Fortyfive<br />

patients received BRT for primary intrathoracic tumors and 20 for<br />

metastatic disease. Fortyfive patients were male and 20 female with<br />

a median age <strong>of</strong> 66 years (range, 2393 years). The median tumor<br />

volume was 160 cm 3 (range, 24633 cm 3 ). The IRTHDRBRT delivered a<br />

median dose <strong>of</strong> 25.0 Gy (range, <strong>10</strong>.035.0 Gy) in twicedaily fractions<br />

<strong>of</strong> 4.015.0 Gy in 30 patients, and a median dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong>.0 Gy (range,<br />

7.032.0 Gy) in oncedaily fractions <strong>of</strong> 4.020.0 Gy in 35 patients.<br />

: The median followup was 13 months (range, 149 months).<br />

The overall survival rate was 61 % at one year, 24 % at two years and 6<br />

% at three years. The overall local control (LC) rate was 87 % at one<br />

year, 83 % at two years and 78 % at three years. The LC rate for<br />

metastatic tumors was 95 %, 88 % and 88 %, and for primary<br />

intrathoracic cancers 84 %, 77 % and 73 % at one, two and three years,<br />

respectively. Pneumothoraces occurred in 8 % <strong>of</strong> interventional<br />

procedures, necessitating postprocedural drainage in one patient.<br />

: Our results confirm CTguided IRTHDRBRT to be an<br />

effective modality for the palliative treatment <strong>of</strong> inoperable<br />

intrathoracic malignancies


S168 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Aalbers, A. OC066<br />

AbdahBortnyak, R. PO243<br />

AbuRustum, N.R. PO252<br />

Ackerman, S. OC136<br />

Ackermann, H. PO420, PO233<br />

Adamson, J. PO353, PO274, PO340, PO266<br />

Adolfsson, E. PO346<br />

Afsharpour, H. PO215, PD<strong>12</strong>0<br />

Aghamiri, S.M.R. PO348<br />

Agostinelli, S. PO280<br />

Aguero, E.G. OC134<br />

Aibe, N. PO166<br />

Akiyama, H. PO369, PO366<br />

Aladin, A.S. PO365<br />

Albert, M. PO349<br />

Albitskiy, I. PO187<br />

Alcalde, J. PO381, OC052<br />

Aldridge, S. PO287, PO197<br />

Alektiar, K. OC046, PO252<br />

Alexander, R. OC034<br />

Ali, M. PO251<br />

Alizadeh, M. PO182<br />

Allan, E. PO387<br />

Allen, C. PO260<br />

Allen, P. PD<strong>12</strong>7<br />

Alm Carlsson, G. PO346<br />

Almadori, G. PO416, PO403<br />

Alonzi, R. OC025<br />

AlQaisieh, B. OC1<strong>10</strong>, PO345<br />

Aluwini, S. PO193<br />

Alva, R.C. PO285<br />

Amado, A. PO221<br />

Amanie, J. OC071<br />

Amin, P. PO405<br />

Amit, A. PO243<br />

An, L. OC074<br />

Anand, V. OC076<br />

Anastasakos, B. PO386<br />

Andersen, C.E. OC069<br />

Anderson, C. OC081<br />

Andikyan, V. OC046<br />

Ando, K. PO263<br />

Andres, I. PO237<br />

Ankerhold, U. PO336<br />

Anscher, M. OC037<br />

Antonini, P. PO296<br />

Aoki, M. PO163<br />

Aoki, Y. PO250<br />

Apicelli, A.J. PO299<br />

Appadurai, I. PO257<br />

Apurba K, K. PO245<br />

Aranha, G. PO415<br />

Araujo, C. PO217, OC036, PO194<br />

Araujo, C.M. PO413<br />

Archambault, L. OC070<br />

Archavlis, E. PO407<br />

Arenas, M. PO240, PO237<br />

Arias, F. OC052<br />

Arika, T. PO366<br />

Aristu, J. PO381<br />

Arm, J. PO260<br />

Armour, E. PO402, OC034<br />

Armour, E.P. PO404<br />

Arnold, A.A. PO356<br />

Aronowitz, J.N. 146<br />

Arora, S. PO383<br />

Arribas, L. OC053<br />

Arrojo Alvarez, E. PO195<br />

Arthur, C. PO230, OC026<br />

Arthur, D. OC136, OC092, 8, OC132<br />

Arunachalam, K. PO329<br />

Asbell, S. OC074<br />

Ashenafi, M. PO334<br />

Ashida, S. PO207<br />

Ashikari, A. PO169, PO162<br />

Asín Felipe, G. PO214<br />

Aslay, I. PO307, PO300, PO294, PO400<br />

Assmann, W. PO397<br />

Astrahan, M.A. OC067<br />

Atsushi, N. PO190<br />

Aubin, S. PO224, OC038, PO354<br />

AubineauLanièce, I. 18<br />

Autorino, R. PO416, PO403<br />

Axente, M. OC037<br />

Azad, N. PO4<strong>10</strong>, PO404<br />

Azario, L. PO411<br />

Bachand, F. OC036<br />

Bader, M. PO397<br />

Baghani, H. PO348<br />

Bains, M.S. PO391<br />

Bajard, A. PO211<br />

Bajwa, H. PO251<br />

Bakacs, G. PO218<br />

Baker, S. PO387<br />

Bakker, C.J.G. PD119<br />

Balestrazzi, E. PO411<br />

Ballester, F. PO204, PO202, PO181, PO328<br />

Ballo, M. PD<strong>12</strong>4<br />

Balm, A.J.M. PD<strong>12</strong>5<br />

Baltas, D. PO420, PO418, PO233, PO407,<br />

OC143<br />

Balvert, M. PO352<br />

Bar – Deroma, R. PO243<br />

Barakat, R.R. PO252<br />

Barani, I. OC037<br />

Barney, B. PO239<br />

Barra, S. PO280<br />

Barret, E. PO154<br />

Basagni, L. PO325<br />

Basu, A. PO3<strong>10</strong>, PO417<br />

Basu, S. PO3<strong>10</strong>, PO417<br />

Batchelar, D. PO217, OC036, PO194<br />

Batel, V. PO360<br />

Battermann, J.J. PO165, PO148<br />

Bauman, G. PO219<br />

Baumann, A. PO302<br />

Baumann, A.S. OC055<br />

Bautista Hernandez Yicel, B.H.Y. PO406<br />

Bautista, C. PO240<br />

Beaney, R.B. PO197<br />

Beaufort, C. PO178<br />

Beaulieu, L. OC141, OC070, PO224, PO215,<br />

OC038, PO354, OC139, PO326<br />

Beavis, A.W. OC111<br />

Beddar, S. OC070<br />

Behera, M.K. PO376<br />

BeikiArdakani, A. PO401<br />

Beitsch, P. OC092<br />

Bel, A. PO205<br />

Belhomme, S. PO170<br />

BéliveauNadeau, D. PO164<br />

Bellini, A. PO280<br />

Ben Yosef, R. PO243<br />

Benda, R. OC136<br />

Benedict, S.H. PO341<br />

Benezery, K. PO388<br />

Bennion, N. OC132<br />

Benoit, R.M. PO159<br />

Berenguer, R. PO237<br />

Berger, D. OC083, OC135<br />

Beriwal, S. PO304, PD<strong>12</strong>8, OC045, OC073,<br />

PO159, PO236<br />

Berniger, A. PO243<br />

Bernik, A. PO175<br />

Bernstein, M. PO290<br />

Bertelsman, C. PO299<br />

Best, L. PO260<br />

Betala, J.F. PO414<br />

Bhagwat, M. OC086<br />

Bhora, F. PO385<br />

Biagioli, M.C. PO293, PO216, PO292<br />

Bieleda, G. PO315<br />

Biesta, J. PO248<br />

Biete, A. PO240<br />

Biewald, E. PO4<strong>12</strong><br />

Biggers, R. OC028<br />

Bijker, N. PO258<br />

Bijok, M. PO321<br />

Bilimagga, R. 59<br />

Billan, S. PO243<br />

Bilsky, M.H. PO390<br />

Birn, G. PO407<br />

Bisirtzoglou, D. PO386<br />

Blank, L. OC056<br />

Blasi, M.A. PO411<br />

Bloom, E. PD<strong>12</strong>4<br />

Bochner, B. OC046<br />

Bockelmann, G. PO335<br />

Bodner, W. PO303, PO316, PO234<br />

Boladeras Inglada, A.M. PO209<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 169<br />

Boland, P. OC046<br />

Bolla, M. PO180<br />

Boockvar, J.A. PO382<br />

Bornfeld, N. PO4<strong>12</strong><br />

Boroghani, E. PO348<br />

Borroni, M. OC078, PO270<br />

Borst, G.R. PD<strong>12</strong>5<br />

Bosch, E. PO311<br />

Bostwick, D. 14<br />

Bottomley, D. PO173<br />

Boudreau, C. PO164<br />

Bourque, A. OC139<br />

Bowes, D. PO217, PO194<br />

Bownes, P. OC1<strong>10</strong>, PO345<br />

Bozic, N. PO287<br />

<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> Working Group PO294<br />

Brackett, N.C. OC134<br />

Brader, P. PO271<br />

Brandão, F. OC089<br />

Bräutigam, E. OC131<br />

Brenner, D.J. PO157<br />

Broksch, R. PO232<br />

Brouste, V. OC041<br />

Brown, J. PD<strong>12</strong>7<br />

Brualla, L. PO361, PO4<strong>12</strong><br />

Bruno, T.L. PO228<br />

Brüske, N. PO232<br />

Bryant, L. OC025<br />

Buchheit, I. PO414, OC055<br />

Buckley, D.L. OC1<strong>10</strong><br />

Buhleier, T. PO233<br />

Bukhari, M. PO3<strong>12</strong><br />

Bullejos, J.A. PO269, PO186<br />

Bulsara, M. PO323<br />

Bumm, K. PO363<br />

Buono, E. PO325<br />

Burri, R.J. PO157<br />

Bus, S.J.E.A. PO265<br />

Bussu, F. PO416, PO403<br />

Byrski, E. PO313<br />

Cai, J. PO353, PO274, PO340, PO266<br />

Caley, A. PO257<br />

Calvo Crespo, P. PO320<br />

Camacho, C. PO296, PO295, PO291<br />

Cambeiro, M. PO381, OC052<br />

Came, D. PO213<br />

Campos, C. PO246<br />

Caputo, T. PO259<br />

Carey, B. OC1<strong>10</strong>, 2<br />

Carlsson Tedgren, A. PO346<br />

Carmona, V. PO220, PO296, PO295, PO291<br />

Carneiro, T.M. PO413<br />

Carney, M. PO359<br />

Carrara, M. OC078, PO270<br />

Carrascosa, M. OC053<br />

Carrizo, M.V. PO237<br />

Carvalho, A.L. PO360<br />

Carvalho, L. PO284, PO347, PO201<br />

Casale, M. PO325<br />

Castilho, L. PO2<strong>12</strong><br />

Castro Gómez, E. PO320<br />

Castro, C. PO201<br />

Cathelineau, X. PO154<br />

Cattani, F. PO319<br />

Caudrelier, J.M. 11<br />

Cavanaugh, S. OC136<br />

Cavatorta, C. OC078<br />

Celada, F. PO296, PO295, PO291<br />

Celada, F.J. PO220<br />

Cerrotta, A. PO270<br />

Cesaretti, J.A. PO157<br />

Chadwick, E. PO231, PO225, PO222, PO2<strong>10</strong><br />

Challacombe, B. PO197<br />

Champoudry, J. OC040, OC084<br />

Chan, E.K. PD<strong>12</strong>3<br />

Chand, M.E. PO388<br />

ChandFouche, M.E. PO183, PO192<br />

Chang, C. PO309<br />

Chao, K.S.C. PO383, PO382, PO259, PO157<br />

Chapman, K.L. PO199, PO272<br />

CharraBrunaud, C. PO302, <strong>10</strong>7<br />

Chatfield, M. PO174<br />

Chatzikonstantinou, G. PO418, PO407<br />

Chaudhari, P. PO262<br />

Chemin, A. PO170, OC041<br />

Chen, C.P. OC029<br />

Chen, P.Y. OC090<br />

Chen, T. PO317<br />

Chen, X.C. PO288<br />

Chen, Y. OC074<br />

Chi, D. OC046<br />

Chicata Sutmöller, V. PO214<br />

Chicata, V. OC052<br />

Chichel, A. PO198, PO315<br />

Chino, J. PO353, PO274, PO340, PO266,<br />

PO329<br />

Chiquita, S. PO358<br />

Chirico, L. PO325<br />

Chiu, J. PO390<br />

ChiuTsao, S.T. OC067<br />

Chng, N. PO213<br />

Cho, Y.B. OC085<br />

Choi, W. PO385<br />

Chopra, S. PO278<br />

Choudhury, A. PO230, OC026<br />

Chuong, M.D. PO216<br />

Chust, M.L. OC053<br />

CikowskaWozniak, E. PO267<br />

Cirino, E. PO161<br />

Coakley, F.V. 15<br />

Cohen, G. PD<strong>12</strong>2, PO200<br />

Cohen, G.N. PO391, PO390, PO379, OC032<br />

Cohn, E. OC028<br />

Colangione, S.P. PO319<br />

Collado, E. PO220, PO291<br />

Colmenares, R. PO419<br />

Colombo, A. PO282, PO185<br />

Comi, S. PO319<br />

Connery, C. PO385<br />

Conroy, R. PO173<br />

Consorti, R. PO218<br />

Corica, T. PO323<br />

Cormack, R. OC1<strong>12</strong>, OC086<br />

Cornell, D.C. PO356<br />

Cosentino, D. PO249<br />

Cosma, S. PO308<br />

Cosset, J.M. PO154<br />

Courdi, A. PO388<br />

Cox, B. OC031, PD<strong>12</strong>2, PO200, OC032<br />

Craciunescu, O. PO353, PO274, PO340, PO266,<br />

PO329<br />

Crandley, E. PO297, PO341<br />

Crehange, G. PO211<br />

Creutzberg, C.L. 130<br />

Croce, O. PO330<br />

Crook, J. PO217, OC036, 11<br />

Crook, J.M. PO194<br />

Cruz, A. PO293, PO216, PO292<br />

Cuaron, J. PD<strong>12</strong>2<br />

Cuartero, J. OC085<br />

Cuccoli, D. PO218<br />

Cunha, A. OC027<br />

Cunha, J.A.M. OC114, PO359<br />

Czyzew, B. PO306, PO321<br />

da Silva, M.G.C. PO246<br />

Dabkowski, M. PO306, PO321<br />

Dabrowski, T. PO313<br />

Dagnault, A. 11<br />

Damast, S. PO252<br />

Damato, A. PO305, OC1<strong>12</strong>, PO357, OC086<br />

D'Amico, R. PO282, PO185<br />

D'Amours, M. PO326<br />

Danielsen, S. OC144<br />

Datsenko, P. PO187<br />

Datta, S. PO3<strong>10</strong>, PO417<br />

Davidova, O.N. PO365<br />

Davila Fajardo, R. PO392<br />

De Brabandere, M. OC066<br />

de HaasKock, D. PD<strong>12</strong>0<br />

de Jong, I.J. PO148<br />

de la Vara, V. PO237<br />

De Leeuw, A. OC081, PO235, PD<strong>12</strong>8<br />

de Leeuw, H. PD119<br />

de Pooter, J. 18, OC065<br />

de Prez, L.A. OC065<br />

de Reijke, T. 17<br />

De Werd, L. 19<br />

Declich, F. PO282, PO185<br />

Dejean, C. PO192, PO183<br />

Deka, P. PO285


S170 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Del Moral Ávila, R. PO186<br />

Del Moral, R. PO269<br />

Delannes, M. PO211, <strong>10</strong>3<br />

Delouya, G. PO164<br />

Demanes, D.J. PO191<br />

Demanes, J. PO289, OC024<br />

Dempsey, C. PO260, PO238<br />

den Hertog, D. PO327, PO352, OC077<br />

Deo, S.V.S. OC133<br />

Depiaggio, M. PO204, PO181, PO202<br />

Derrah, L. OC072, PO219<br />

Desai, P. PO259<br />

Desai, S. OC054, OC054<br />

Descat, E. PO170<br />

Descotes, J.L. PO180<br />

Deshpande, D.D. PO343<br />

Deshpande, S. OC076<br />

Despré, P. PO224<br />

Després, P. OC038, OC139, PO326<br />

Devic, S. OC113<br />

DeWees, T.A. PO299<br />

DeWerd, L. PO342, OC068, 93, 20<br />

Diallo, I. OC084<br />

Diaz, L. PO4<strong>10</strong>, PO404<br />

Dicker, A.P. PO199<br />

Dilworth, J. PO229<br />

Dimopoulos, J. 6<br />

Dinapoli, N. PO416, PO403<br />

Ding, K. PO297, PO341<br />

Dinkla, A.M. PO205<br />

Dixit, N. PO309<br />

Doggett, S. 11<br />

Doino, D. PO280<br />

Dokiya, T. PO158<br />

Dolinska, Z. PO384<br />

Domínguez Domínguez, M.A. PO214<br />

Donath, D. PO164<br />

Doyle, L.A. PO199, PO272<br />

Draghini, L. PO325<br />

D'Souza, D. OC072, PO219<br />

Du Plessis, F.C.P. PO380<br />

Dugal, R. PO349<br />

Dumas, I. OC040, OC084<br />

Dunnington, G.H. 98<br />

Durbin Johnson, B. PO281<br />

Dutta, S. PO376<br />

Dybek, D. PO313<br />

Dyk, P.T. PO299<br />

Dymnicka, M. PO315<br />

Dziecichowicz, A. PO313<br />

Eagle, A. PO339, PO268<br />

Eastham, J. OC031<br />

Ebara, T. PO206<br />

Ebert, M. PO184, PO184<br />

Efron, J. PO4<strong>10</strong>, PO404<br />

Egawa, S. PO163<br />

Egger, J. PO288<br />

Eidi, R. PO348<br />

Eifel, P. PD<strong>12</strong>7<br />

Einck, J. OC113<br />

Eito, C. PO214<br />

Elliot, P. PO230<br />

Elsaid, A. PO241<br />

EMBRACE Study Centers, E.M. OC043<br />

Engineer, R. PO278<br />

Eniu, D. PO374<br />

Erickson, B. 23<br />

Esquivel, C. PO152<br />

Evans, A. PO385<br />

Expósito Hernández, J. PO186<br />

Expósito, P. PO269<br />

Ezhgurova, Y. PO208<br />

Fahy, L. PO298<br />

Fallai, C. PO270<br />

Farrow, H. PO387<br />

Fathalizadeh, A. PO400<br />

Fayda, M. PO400<br />

Federico, M. OC043<br />

Ferentinos, K. PO420<br />

Fernandez, D.C. PO293, PO216, PO292<br />

Fernández, J. PO195<br />

Ferreira, M. PO286<br />

Ferreira, M.A. PO413<br />

Ferreira, U. PO2<strong>12</strong><br />

Ferrer González, F. PO209<br />

Feuillade, J. PO192, PO388<br />

Fidarova, E. OC083, <strong>10</strong>1<br />

Fietkau, R. OC088, PO177<br />

Figueira, A. PO360<br />

Filipowski, T. PO399, PO176<br />

Finger, P.T. OC067<br />

Fleckenstein, J. PO363<br />

Floquet, A. OC041<br />

Florea, L. PO374<br />

Flores, D. PO388<br />

Flower, E. PO350<br />

Flühs, D. PO361<br />

Fodor, C. PO319<br />

Fodor, J. OC087<br />

Fokdal, L. OC082, OC039, OC069<br />

Folkert, M.R. PO390, PO379<br />

Followill, D.S. OC067<br />

Forsythe, K. PO149<br />

Foster, W. PO224, PO354<br />

Franchisseur, E. PO330<br />

Frank, S. PO227<br />

Frank, S.J. PO228<br />

Franken, S. PO165<br />

Frantzeskou, K. PO257<br />

Freilich, J.M. PO293, PO292<br />

Fried, P. 11<br />

Frigerio, C. PO282, PO185<br />

Fu Jun, Z. PO372<br />

Fuentes Mariles Sonia, F.M.S. PO406<br />

Fulkerson, R. OC068<br />

Furmanchuk, L. PO279<br />

Furukawa, S. PO369<br />

Fyles, A. OC085<br />

Gabel, M. PO256<br />

Gademann, G. <strong>10</strong>0<br />

Gagea, M. PO227<br />

Gagne, N.L. PO355, PO378<br />

Gagne, S. PO349<br />

Gal, J. PO192, PO183, 138<br />

Galalae, R. PO232, OC024<br />

Galhardo, E. PO349<br />

Gambarini, G. OC078<br />

Gandhi, A.K. OC042, PO338<br />

Ganesh, K.M. PO247<br />

GarcíaFoncillas, J. PO381<br />

GarciaMora, M.C. PO295, PO220<br />

GarciaRamirez, J. PO276, PO299<br />

Gardner, G.J. PO252<br />

Gardner, S.J. PO199<br />

Garelli, S. PO280<br />

Garg, A. OC114<br />

Garg, M. PO303, PO234<br />

Garipagaoglu, M. PO307<br />

Garner, D. PO171<br />

Gar<strong>of</strong>alo, M. PO405<br />

Gauthier, M. PO388, PO183<br />

GazdicSantic, M. PO333<br />

Gaztanaga, M. PO217, OC036, PO194<br />

Gearhart, S. PO4<strong>10</strong>, PO404<br />

Geijsen, E. OC056<br />

Gentil Jiménez, M.A. PO186<br />

Gentil, M.A. PO269<br />

Ge<strong>org</strong>iou, E. PO337<br />

Gérard, J.P. 99, PO388, PO330<br />

Gerdes, H. PO379<br />

German Farfalli, G.F. PO377<br />

Gerst, S. OC046<br />

Gherardi, F. PO319<br />

Ghilezan, M. PO229<br />

Ghosh, J. OC054<br />

Ghosh, K. PO3<strong>10</strong>, PO417<br />

Ghosh, S. OC071<br />

Giannelli, F. PO280<br />

Gibbs, G. OC028<br />

Gifford, K. PD<strong>12</strong>4<br />

Gilmore, J. OC040, OC084<br />

Giraud, J.Y. PO180<br />

Godellas, C. PO415<br />

Godfrey, L. PO318<br />

Godley, A. PO394<br />

Goksel, E.O. PO307<br />

Goldberg, K. OC114<br />

Goldner, G. PO271<br />

Golub, S. PO187<br />

Gomes, M. PO284<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 171<br />

González Patiño, E. PO320<br />

González, H. PO195<br />

Goodman, K.A. PO379<br />

Gorissen, B. PO352, OC077<br />

Gorissen, B.L. PO327<br />

Gospodarowicz, M. <strong>10</strong>2<br />

Gottschalk, A. OC029<br />

Goulart, J. OC040, OC084<br />

Grabowski, S. PO405<br />

Graff, P. PO414<br />

Granero, D. PO328<br />

Graves, Y.J. PO322<br />

Grazziotin, R.Z. PO413<br />

Greene, T. PO318<br />

Greskovich, J. PO394<br />

Gribaudo, S. PO308<br />

Grigsby, P. PO276<br />

Grigsby, P.W. PO299<br />

Grimard, L. PO409<br />

Gruszczynska, E. PO306, PO321<br />

Guedea Edo, F. PO209<br />

Guerra, A.S. 18<br />

Guerrero Tejada, R. PO186<br />

Guerrero, R. PO269<br />

Gugic, J. PO261<br />

Guinot, J.L. OC053, 118<br />

Guirado, D. PO333<br />

Gulia, A. OC054<br />

Gupta, D. PO259<br />

Gupta, L. PO262<br />

Gupta, S. OC054, PO278<br />

Gustafson, G. PO229<br />

Gustafsson, H. PO346<br />

Gutiérrez Miguélez, C. PO209<br />

Guyon, F. OC041<br />

Hachem, S. PO330<br />

HackerPrietz, A. PO4<strong>10</strong>, PO402<br />

Haddad, A. PO414, OC055<br />

Haddock, M. PO239<br />

Haga, A. PO167<br />

Hagan, M.P. OC037<br />

Haider, I. PO251, PO3<strong>12</strong><br />

HaieMeder, C. OC040, OC083, OC084, <strong>10</strong>7, <strong>12</strong>, 1<br />

Hajage, D. PO154<br />

Hajdok, G. OC072<br />

Halperin, R. PO217<br />

Hamano, T. PO250<br />

Hamid, S. OC136<br />

Hammer, J. OC131<br />

Han, D. OC113<br />

Han, S.B. OC075<br />

Hanlon, A. PO405<br />

Hanna, L. PO257<br />

Hanna, N. PO405<br />

HannounLevi, J. 138<br />

HannounLevi, J.M. PO192, PO183<br />

Hansen, E.S. OC039<br />

Happersett, L. OC032<br />

Harper, J. PO334<br />

Harter, V. PO414<br />

Hawliczek, R. PO223<br />

Haworth, A. PO184, PO184<br />

Hayes, M. PO171<br />

Hayman, O. PO344, PO264, PO332<br />

Heidenreich, A. 80<br />

Hellebust, T.P. OC083<br />

Henkel, T. PO155<br />

Henrique, R. PO201<br />

Henry, A. OC1<strong>10</strong>, PO345, PO153<br />

Hepel, J.T. PO314<br />

Hering, E.R. PO380<br />

Herman, J. PO4<strong>10</strong><br />

Herman, J.M. PO404, PO402<br />

Hernanz de Lucas, R. PO419<br />

Herreros, A. PO240<br />

Hervieux, Y. PO164<br />

Hewitt, M. PO339, PO268<br />

Heysek, R.V. PO216<br />

Hiatt, J.R. PO314<br />

Hickman, A. PO257<br />

Hijazi, H. PO192, PO183<br />

Hildebrandt, G. OC088<br />

Hindson, B. PO178<br />

Hirashima, Y. PO250<br />

Hiratsuka, J. PO158<br />

Hissoiny, S. PO326<br />

Hobbs, R. PO402<br />

Hobbs, R.F. PO404<br />

Hodek, M. PO150<br />

Hoekstra, C. OC035<br />

H<strong>of</strong>fmann, A. PO352, PO327, OC077<br />

H<strong>of</strong>fstetter, S. PO302<br />

Hojo, H. PO189<br />

Hokland, S.B. OC082<br />

Holcomb, K. PO259<br />

Homola, L. PO151<br />

Honda, K. PO160<br />

Hong, L. PO303, PO316, PO234<br />

Horenblas, S. PO148<br />

Horiba, M. PO405<br />

Horowitz, D.P. PO157<br />

Horsfield, C.J. OC111<br />

Hoskin, P. PO173, OC025, PO153, 5<br />

Hosseini Daghigh, S.M. PO348<br />

Hosseinzadeh, K. OC045<br />

Houédé, N. PO170<br />

Houser, C. PO304, OC073, PO236<br />

Hruby, G. PO188, PO174<br />

Hsu, I. OC029, OC027<br />

Huang, M.W. PO398, PO396, PO393<br />

Hudej, R. PO175<br />

Hudson, E. PO257<br />

Huger, S. OC055<br />

Hughes, L. OC074<br />

Hughes, R. OC025<br />

Hunt, D. OC027, PO293, PO292<br />

Hürter, W. PO311<br />

Hussein, S. 11<br />

Ibbott, G. 93<br />

Iftimia, I. PO161<br />

Ilson, D.H. PO379<br />

Immerzeel, J. OC035<br />

Inaba, K. PO255<br />

Indrieri, P. PO249<br />

Ioannou, L. PO264, PO332<br />

Ishida, M. PO156<br />

Ishikawa, H. PO206<br />

Isohashi, F. PO179<br />

Italiani, M. PO325<br />

Itami, J. PO255<br />

Ito, Y. PO255<br />

Itoh, K. PO206<br />

Ivanov, S. PO187<br />

Iwata, T. PO166<br />

Jaberi, R. PO348<br />

Jackson, M. PO174<br />

Jagadesan, P. PO262<br />

Jain, A. PO385<br />

Jambhekar, N. OC054<br />

Jansen, E. OC056<br />

Jansen, P. PO193<br />

Janssen, T.G. PO265<br />

Janssens, G.O. OC051<br />

Jauns, C. PO193<br />

Javed, S. PO231, PO225, PO222, PO2<strong>10</strong><br />

Jelly, F. PO373<br />

Jennings, S. OC028<br />

Jenrette, J. PO334<br />

Jezioranski, J. PO401<br />

Jhingran, A. PD<strong>12</strong>7<br />

Jia, L.F. PO398<br />

Jiang, P. PO389, PO242, PO368<br />

Jiang, W. PO389, PO242, PO368<br />

Jiang, Y. PO389, PO371, PO370, PO368<br />

Jimenez, E. PO237<br />

Jiménez, I. PO195<br />

Johansen, M.J. PO227<br />

Jordan, K. PO219<br />

J<strong>org</strong>e, M. PO286<br />

Joseph, D. PO184<br />

Joseph, D.J. PO323, 9<br />

Julka, P.K. OC042, PO338, PO262, OC133<br />

Jurado, M. PO381<br />

JürgenliemkSchulz, I. 4, PO235, PD<strong>12</strong>8<br />

Juvekar, S. OC054<br />

Jyotirup, G. PO245<br />

Kaanders, J.H. OC051<br />

Kacso, G. PO374<br />

Kahmann, F. PO155<br />

KaidarPerson, O. PO243


S172 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Kakimoto, N. PO369<br />

Kaldas, S. PO188<br />

Kallol, B. PO245<br />

Kalnick, S. PO316<br />

Kalnicki, S. PO303, PO290, PO234<br />

Kamada, T. PO263<br />

Kamel, I. PO4<strong>10</strong><br />

Kaminuma, T. PO206<br />

Kamoi, K. PO166<br />

Kamrava, M. PO289, PO191<br />

Kanao, K. PO156<br />

Kanehira, C. PO163<br />

Kanikowski, M. PO198, PO315<br />

Kannan, N. OC073, PO236<br />

Kannan, V. OC076<br />

Kano, M. PO366<br />

Kao, J. PO157<br />

Kaplan, S. PO273<br />

Kapur, T. PO305<br />

Kapur, T.K. PO288<br />

Karasawa, K. PO263<br />

Kariya, S. PO207, PO158<br />

Karlsson, L. PO362<br />

Kasamatsu, T. PO255<br />

Kasaova, L. PO364, PO150<br />

Kasch, K.U. PO155<br />

Kashiyama, S. PO156<br />

Kasler, M. OC087<br />

Katayama, M. PO156<br />

Kato, S. PO263<br />

Katoh, H. PO206<br />

Katsilieri, Z. OC143<br />

Katsilieris, I. PO386<br />

Kattevilder, R. OC035<br />

KauerDorner, D. OC135, 138<br />

Kaushik, G. PO245<br />

Kavanaugh, J. PO299<br />

Kawakami, N. PO2<strong>12</strong>, OC089<br />

Kawczynska, M. PO306, PO321<br />

Kazberuk, D.E. PO399<br />

Kefala, V. OC143<br />

Keisch, M. OC092<br />

Keisei, O. PO168<br />

Kemikler, G. PO300, PO400<br />

Kemp, J. PO301<br />

Kerkar, R. PO278<br />

Kerkmeijer, L. PO172<br />

Kertzscher, G. OC069<br />

Keshtgar, M. PO323<br />

Keyes, M. PD<strong>12</strong>3, PO171<br />

Khan, A. PO317<br />

Khuntia, D. 98<br />

Kido, M. PO163<br />

Kiess, A. PO252<br />

Kim, D. PO217<br />

Kim, H. PO304, OC073, PO236<br />

Kim, L. PO317<br />

Kim, Y. PO339, PO268<br />

Kimmig, B. PO232<br />

Kind, M. OC041<br />

Kirby, N. PO359<br />

Kirchheiner, K. PO271<br />

Kirisits, C. OC044, OC043, PO271, OC081, <strong>10</strong>8,<br />

<strong>10</strong>9, <strong>10</strong>7, 94<br />

Kirkels, W. PO193<br />

Kirsner, S. PD<strong>12</strong>4<br />

Kishi, K. PO203<br />

Kitagawa, R. PO250<br />

Kiyohara, H. PO263<br />

Kizir, A. PO400<br />

Klopp, A. PD<strong>12</strong>7<br />

Knaup, C. PO152<br />

Kobayashi, K. PO166<br />

Kobayashi, M. PO163<br />

Kobayashi, R. PO158<br />

Kobzda, J. PO267<br />

Kodani, N. PO166<br />

Koedooder, C. OC066, PO205, PO258, OC056<br />

Kohno, N. PO168<br />

Koike, N. PO162<br />

Koizumi, M. PO179, PO369<br />

Kolar, M. PO394<br />

KolkmanDeurloo, I. PO193<br />

Kollmeier, M. OC031, PD<strong>12</strong>2, OC032 PO200,<br />

PO252<br />

Kolotas, C. PO420, PO418, PO407<br />

Koning, C. OC056<br />

Konishi, K. PO179<br />

Koper, P. PO248<br />

Korbelik, J. PO171<br />

Koretsune, Y. PO366<br />

Kosenko, I. PO283, PO279<br />

Kostevich, G. PO279<br />

Kotzen, J.A. PO254<br />

Kouji, A. PO190<br />

Kouwenhoven, E. PO248<br />

Kovacs, A. OC086<br />

Kovacs, G. OC142, PO403, 138, OC135, 16<br />

Kozlovsky, D. PO208<br />

Kramer, N. OC074<br />

Kratochwil, A. PO271<br />

Krauss, D. PO229<br />

Kreppner, S. PO177<br />

Krishnamurthy, D. OC027<br />

Krol, G. PO390<br />

Kucucuk, H. PO307<br />

Kucucuk, S. PO300, PO400<br />

Kudchadker, R. PO227, PO228<br />

Kudzia, R. PO313<br />

Kuhel, W. PO383<br />

Kukielka, A. PO313<br />

Kulik, A. PO321<br />

Kumar, R. PO402<br />

Kunaprayoon, D. PO200<br />

Kunogi, H. PO189<br />

Kuo, H. PO303, PO290, PO316, PO234<br />

Kuroda, Y. PO255<br />

Kuruvilla, A. OC136<br />

Kuske & C. Quiet, R. OC136<br />

Kuske, R. 57, PO322<br />

Kuten, A. PO243<br />

Kutler, D. PO383<br />

KwakkelHuizenga, L. PO248<br />

Kwasny, M. PO415<br />

Labeck, W. OC131<br />

LaCouture, T. OC074<br />

Lacroix, F. PO354<br />

Lagier, J. PO388<br />

Laing, R. PO231<br />

Laing, R.W. PO225, PO222, PO2<strong>10</strong><br />

Lala, M. OC076<br />

Lan, L. PO340<br />

Landry, G. PO346, PD<strong>12</strong>0, OC140<br />

Langdal, I. OC144<br />

Langley, S. PO222, PO231, PO225, PO2<strong>10</strong><br />

Lapeyre, M. PO414<br />

Lapid, O. PO392<br />

Lapointe, V. PD<strong>12</strong>3<br />

Lapuz, C. PO238<br />

Larouche, R. PO164<br />

Lartigau, E. PO241<br />

Lasbareilles, O. PO170, OC041<br />

Laskar, S. OC054<br />

Lavallée, M.C. PO354<br />

Lazzari, R. PO319<br />

Le, Y. PO404, OC034<br />

Lecuona, K. PO380<br />

Lee, C. PO316<br />

Lee, L. PO275, OC047<br />

Lee, R. 97<br />

Lee, S. OC091<br />

Lefkopoulos, D. OC084<br />

Lencart, J. PO284, PO347<br />

Leonard, K.L. PO314<br />

Leonardi, M.C. PO319<br />

Leong, N. OC071<br />

Lettmaier, S. PO177<br />

Levenback, C. PD<strong>12</strong>7<br />

Lever, F.M. PD<strong>12</strong>6<br />

Levin, W. OC085<br />

Lewis, C. PO219<br />

Li, J. PO242<br />

Li, K. PO356<br />

Li, Y. PO375<br />

Li, Z. PO375<br />

Libby, B. PO297, PO341<br />

Licht, N. PO363<br />

Lim, J. PO281<br />

Lin, L. PO309<br />

Lin, L.E.I. PO370<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 173<br />

Lin, P.S. OC037<br />

Linares Galiana, I. PO186<br />

Linares, I. PO269<br />

Lindegaard, J. OC043, OC069, OC044, OC082,<br />

OC039, <strong>10</strong>7, 23<br />

Liney, G.P. OC111<br />

Lipman, D. OC051<br />

Lips, I.M. PD<strong>12</strong>6<br />

Lis, E. PO390<br />

Litvinova, T. PO279<br />

Liu, B. PO375<br />

Liu, C. OC075, PO242<br />

Liu, C.H.E.N. PO371<br />

Liu, D. PO226<br />

Liu, S.M. PO395, PO393<br />

Livsey, J. PO230<br />

Llacer, C. PO211<br />

Lliso, F. PO220, PO296, PO295, PO291<br />

Lo, T. PO161<br />

Loessl, K. 138<br />

Logue, J. PO230, PO173, OC026<br />

Lokesh, V. PO247<br />

Lomas, H. PO216<br />

Long, J.A. PO180<br />

LopezPicazo, J.M. OC052<br />

LopezYurda, M. PD<strong>12</strong>5<br />

Lorentz, W.C. PO191<br />

Lotfy, N. PO241<br />

Lotter, M. OC088, PO177<br />

Lovett, A. PO188<br />

Lowe, G. OC025<br />

Lowe, V. 3<br />

Lozhkov, A. PO365<br />

Lüdemann, L. PO4<strong>12</strong><br />

Ludwig, E. PO379<br />

Luis Aponte Tinao, L.A. PO377<br />

Lujan Castilla Pomponio, L.C.P.PO406<br />

Lukacko, P. PO384<br />

Luna Vega, V. PO320<br />

Lund, E. PO346<br />

Luo, C. PO349<br />

Lutgens, L. PD<strong>12</strong>0<br />

Luzi, S. PO411<br />

Lyczek, J. OC088<br />

Lyden, M. OC092<br />

Ma, Y.Q. OC075<br />

MacAulay, M. PO171<br />

Madan, R. OC133<br />

Madden, T. PO227<br />

Madersbacher, S. PO223<br />

Madon, E. PO308<br />

Mah, D. PO316<br />

Mahadevan, A. PO161<br />

Mahantshetty, U. PO278, PO343<br />

Mahdavi, D.R. PO244<br />

Mahdavi, S.R. PO348<br />

Maheshwari, A. PO278<br />

Major, T. OC088, OC087<br />

Makarewicz, R. PO267<br />

Makker, V. PO252<br />

Malik, J. PO230, PO173, OC026<br />

Malinen, E. OC083<br />

Manchul, L. OC085<br />

Mandall, P. PO230, OC026<br />

Mandell, P. PO173<br />

Mangiacotti, F.P. PO218<br />

Manigandan, D. OC042, PO338, PO262<br />

Mantz, C.A. PO322<br />

Marafioti, L. PO249<br />

Maranzano, E. PO325<br />

Marcela de la Torre, M.T. PO377<br />

Marcelino, G. PO221<br />

Marcie, S. PO388<br />

Marcié, S. PO330<br />

Maree, G.J. PO380<br />

Markiewicz, W. PO399<br />

Marolt, P. PO175<br />

Marques Vidal, P. PO221<br />

Marshall, I.R. OC134<br />

Martell, K. OC071<br />

Marthinsen, A.B.L. OC144<br />

Martin, A.G. PO224, OC038, PO354<br />

Martin, T. PO233<br />

Martínez Carrillo, M. PO186<br />

Martinez Cobo, R. PO196<br />

Martínez Pérez, E. PO209<br />

Martinez, A. PO229, OC024<br />

Martínez, M. PO269<br />

MartinezMonge, R. PO381, OC052, OC024<br />

Martini, M. PO218<br />

Martirosyan, K. PO227<br />

Mart<strong>of</strong>, A. PO341<br />

Martos, A. PO237<br />

Marussi, E. OC089<br />

Masar, M. PO384<br />

Masarykova, A. PO384<br />

Masayoshi, Y. PO190<br />

Masenga, D. PO308<br />

Mason, B. PD<strong>12</strong>4<br />

Mason, J. OC1<strong>10</strong>, PO345<br />

Masood, A. PO251, PO3<strong>12</strong><br />

Masood, U. PO3<strong>12</strong><br />

Mast, M. PO248<br />

Mathai, M. PO281<br />

Mathur, N. PO200<br />

Matos, J. PO201<br />

Matsui, H. PO206<br />

Mattiucci, G. PO416<br />

Matylevich, O. PO279<br />

Maurer, J. PO340, PO266<br />

Mavrichev, S. PO283<br />

Mavroidis, P. OC143, PO152<br />

<strong>May</strong>adev, J. PO281<br />

<strong>May</strong>ahara, H. PO255<br />

Mazeron, R. OC040, OC084<br />

McGovern, M. PO197<br />

McKenzie, M. PD<strong>12</strong>3<br />

McMahon, R. PO329<br />

Mehmood, T. PO3<strong>12</strong><br />

Mehta, K. PO303, PO316, PO234<br />

Mehta, K.J. PO290<br />

Meigooni, A. 93<br />

Meigooni, A.S. OC067<br />

Meijnen, P. PO205, PO258<br />

Meirelles, A. PO2<strong>12</strong><br />

Melchert, C. OC135<br />

Melhus, C.S. PO355, PO314<br />

Melian, E. PO415<br />

Melich Cerveira, J. PO221<br />

Méndez, L. PO195<br />

Mendiboure, J. PO170<br />

Mendonça, V. PO221, PO286<br />

Meng, N. OC075, PO368<br />

Meng, N.A. PO389, PO371, PO370<br />

Mercedes, Z. PO269<br />

Mesina, C. PO309<br />

Mhatre, R. OC076<br />

Mhlanga, S.H. PO254<br />

Miccichè, F. PO416, PO403<br />

Michael, A. PO2<strong>10</strong><br />

Michalska, M. PO267<br />

Micka, J. PO342, OC068<br />

Mikami, M. PO250<br />

Miki, K. PO163<br />

Miki, T. PO166<br />

Milenin, K. PO187<br />

Milette, M.P. PO217<br />

Milickovic, N. PO418, PO233, OC143<br />

Milosevic, M. OC085<br />

Minken, A. OC035<br />

Mirri, M.A. PO218<br />

Mitch, M. 93<br />

Mitchell, C.K. OC090<br />

Mitchell, D.M. PO147<br />

Miyake, S. PO160<br />

Miyakubo, M. PO206<br />

Moerland, M.A. OC066, PO235, PD119, PD<strong>12</strong>6,<br />

PO165<br />

Moeslein, F. PO405<br />

Mohamed Yoosuf, A.B. PO147<br />

Mohamed, S. OC044, OC081<br />

Mohammed, F. PO254<br />

Mohammed, N. OC024<br />

Moman, M.R. PO165, PO148<br />

Monajemi, T. PO226<br />

Monetti, U. PO308<br />

Monnin, D. PO170<br />

Monninkh<strong>of</strong>, E. PO172<br />

Monroe, A. OC028<br />

Montazeri, A. PO373


S174 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Monteiro Grillo, I. PO221, PO286<br />

Montenero, G. PO377<br />

Montero Luis, A. PO419<br />

Montesdeoca, N. OC052<br />

Monti, C. PO2<strong>12</strong>, OC089<br />

Montoya Monterrubio Juan, M.M.J.<br />

PO406<br />

Morales, J.C. PO220, PO296, PO295, PO291<br />

Morcovescu, S. PD<strong>12</strong>1<br />

M<strong>org</strong>an, R. PO2<strong>10</strong><br />

M<strong>org</strong>ia, M. OC085<br />

Morice, P. OC040<br />

Morikawa, L. PO413<br />

Morota, M. PO255<br />

Morra, A. PO319<br />

Morrier, J. PO354<br />

Morris, J.W. PO171<br />

Morris, S.L. PO197<br />

Morris, W.J. PO213, PD<strong>12</strong>3<br />

Morton, J.F.M. PD<strong>12</strong>1<br />

Mosalaei, H. PO219<br />

Motwani, S. PO256<br />

Moumdjian, C. PO164<br />

Mourtada, F. OC067<br />

Moustakis, C. OC030<br />

Mower, H. PO161<br />

Mozerova, E.Y. PO365<br />

Muhammad, A. PO3<strong>12</strong><br />

Mukhopadyay, N. OC132<br />

Mulhall, J. PO200<br />

Mullick, S. PO417, PO3<strong>10</strong><br />

Mulligan, M. PO219<br />

Muñoz, M.J. PO237<br />

Munro, R. PO380<br />

Munsell, M.F. PO228<br />

Murakami, N. PO255<br />

Murakami, S. PO369<br />

Murata, K. PO206, PO168<br />

Murray, T. OC072, PO219, OC111<br />

Murrer, L. PD<strong>12</strong>0<br />

Murtha, A. OC071<br />

Muruganandham, M. PO339, PO268<br />

Mussano, A. PO308<br />

Mut, A. OC053<br />

Muti, M. PO325<br />

Mutyala, S. PO408<br />

Mynampati, D. PO303, PO234<br />

Naeem, M. PO287<br />

Nagar, Y. PO264, PO332<br />

Nahajowski, D. PO313<br />

Nakagawa, K. PO167<br />

Nakajima, Y. PO156<br />

Nakano, T. PO206, PO277, PO263<br />

Nakashiro, M. PO189<br />

Namidome, R. PO162<br />

Namitome, R. PO169<br />

Napier, E. PO147<br />

Napoli, J. PO318<br />

Napolitano, M.E. OC067<br />

Narra, V. PO317, PO256<br />

Nash, M. OC029<br />

Nassisi, D. PO308<br />

Natale, R. PO388<br />

Nath, R. OC067<br />

Naveen, T. PO247<br />

Nazarnejad, M. PO244<br />

Ndlovo, A. PO318<br />

Nedialkova, L. PO382, PO259<br />

Nelson, C. PD<strong>12</strong>4, PO256<br />

Nemeth, G. OC087<br />

Nesvacil, N. OC081<br />

Neto, F.J.M. PO246<br />

Nevelsky, A. PO243<br />

Newhouse, C. PO273<br />

Ng, J. PO157<br />

Niazi, I. PO251<br />

Nichols, E.M. PO405<br />

Nickers, P. PO241<br />

Nieh<strong>of</strong>f, P. OC135, PO153, 138<br />

Nielsen, S.K. OC069, OC082, OC039<br />

Niewald, M. PO363<br />

Niksa, M. PO399<br />

Niladri B, P. PO245<br />

Nishioka, A. PO207<br />

Nishiyama, T. PO169, PO162<br />

Nkiwane, K. OC043<br />

Noble, S. PO257<br />

Noda, S. PO277<br />

Noda, Y. PO203<br />

Nomden, C.N. PO235<br />

Noordanus, R. PO392<br />

Nori, D. OC091, PO383, PO382, PO259<br />

Novaes, P.E. PO246<br />

Nowik, W. PO399, PO176<br />

Nozomu, T. PO190<br />

Nuñez, A. PO237<br />

Nuver, T. OC035<br />

O'Brien, P. PO260, PO238<br />

O'Toole, M.M. PO147<br />

Obed, R.I. PO351<br />

Oberlander, A.S. OC084<br />

Ogata, T. PO179<br />

Ogawa, K. PO179, PO369<br />

Ogawa, Y. PO207<br />

Oguchi, M. PO250<br />

Oh, S. OC085<br />

Ohara, R. PO156<br />

Ohkubo, Y. PO263<br />

Ohno, T. PO277<br />

Ohri, N. PO272<br />

Oismueller, R. PO223<br />

Oka, T. PO160<br />

Okada, Y. PO168<br />

Okihara, K. PO166<br />

Okinaka, Y. PO168<br />

Okonogi, N. PO277<br />

Okuma, K. PO167<br />

Olarte, A. PO381, OC052<br />

Oldrini, S. OC055<br />

Olijve, G.H. PO265<br />

Oliveira, A. PO201<br />

Oliveira, J. PO201<br />

Oliveira, J.A.A. PO246<br />

on behalf <strong>of</strong> the TARGIT Trialists' Group,<br />

PO323<br />

Onoe, T. PO167<br />

Oorschot van, T. PO248<br />

Oosterveld, B.J. PO265<br />

Oral, E.N. PO400<br />

Orecchia, R. PO319<br />

Osian, A. OC091<br />

Ostler, P. OC025<br />

Ott, O.J. OC088<br />

Ouhib, Z. PO328<br />

Oyekunle, E.O. PO351<br />

Özbay, I. PO400, PO300<br />

Ozell, B. PO326<br />

Paas, L. PO311<br />

Pagliara, M. PO411<br />

Pahlajani, N. OC074<br />

Palacios Eito, A. PO196<br />

Palcic, B. PO171<br />

Palled, S. PO247<br />

Palloni, T. PO218<br />

Palmer, A. PO344, PO264, PO332<br />

Palmqvist, T. OC144<br />

Paludan, M. OC069<br />

Paludetti, G. PO416, PO403<br />

Paluska, P. PO364, PO150<br />

PancewiczJanczuk, B. PO399, PO176<br />

Pandha, H. PO2<strong>10</strong><br />

Pang, C.N. OC075<br />

Pannullo, S. PO382<br />

Panshin, G. PO187<br />

Pantelis, E. PO337<br />

Papagiannis, P. PO337, 117<br />

Papaioannou, S. PO233<br />

Papalla, K. PO386<br />

Papanikolaou, N. PO152<br />

Papavasileiou, T. PO407<br />

Parashar, B. PO383, PO382, PO259<br />

Park, S. PO289<br />

Parker, B. PO217<br />

Parker, K. PO257<br />

Parliament, M. OC071<br />

Patanjali, N. PO188, PO174<br />

Patel, R. PO405, 98<br />

Patil, N. OC072, PO219<br />

Patwe, P. OC076<br />

Paul, A. PO415<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 175<br />

Paul, E. PO178<br />

PaulsenHellebust, T. OC081<br />

Pavese, A. PO383<br />

Pavlov, A. PO187<br />

Pawlicki, T. OC115<br />

Peddada, A. OC028<br />

Pedersen, E.M. OC082, OC039<br />

Pedersen, J. OC071<br />

Pei, X. OC031, PD<strong>12</strong>2, PO200<br />

Peiffert, D. PO414, PO302, OC055<br />

Pellejero, S. PO214<br />

Peng, J. PO334<br />

Pera Fàbregas, J. PO209<br />

Pereira, A. PO284, PO347, PO201<br />

Perez Aguilar, D. PO419<br />

Pérez Calatayud, J. PO202<br />

Perez, C. 13<br />

Perez, G. PO188, PO174<br />

PerezCalatayud, J. PO204, PO181, PO328, <strong>10</strong>4<br />

PO220, PO296, PO295, PO291<br />

Perkova, H. PO151<br />

Perry, K. PD<strong>12</strong>1<br />

Pervez, N. OC071, 11<br />

Pesudo, C. OC053<br />

Petera, J. PO364, PO150<br />

Peters, M. OC033, PO165, PO148<br />

Petersen, I. PO239<br />

Petersen, L.K. OC039<br />

Petit, A. OC041<br />

Petric, P. OC083, PO261<br />

Petrucci, A. PO218<br />

Pickles, T. PD<strong>12</strong>3<br />

Piena, M. OC033<br />

Pierrat, N. PO154<br />

Pieters, B. PO392, OC056<br />

Pieters, B.R. PO205, PO258<br />

Pigge, C. PO339, PO268<br />

Pigneux, J. OC041<br />

Pignol, J. 11<br />

Pignoli, E. OC078, PO270<br />

Pike, T. PO342<br />

Pina, F. PO221<br />

Pino Sorroche, F. PO209<br />

Piro, F. PO249<br />

Pirraco, R. PO358, PO284, PO347<br />

Placa, F. PO282, PO185<br />

Plamondon, M. OC141<br />

Platta, C. 98<br />

Pobijakova, M. PO384<br />

Polgar, C. OC088, 138, OC087, 7<br />

Poli, M.E.R. PO331<br />

Politis, G. PO386<br />

Polizoi, B. PO386<br />

Poljanc, K. PO223<br />

Polo Rubio, A. PO419<br />

Pomeroy, M. PO298<br />

Pommier, P. PO211<br />

Pons, O. PO220<br />

Popert, R.B. PO197<br />

Potrebko, P. OC074<br />

Pötter, R. OC088, OC083, OC044, OC043,<br />

PO271, OC081, <strong>10</strong>8, <strong>10</strong>9, <strong>10</strong>7, 23, 21<br />

Pouliot, J. OC114, PO359, OC027<br />

Praag, J. PO193<br />

Prada, P.J. PO195<br />

Pramod, K.P.R. PO247<br />

Prefontaine, M. OC072<br />

Prestidge, B. OC136<br />

Price, M. PO301<br />

Pugh, T.J. PO228, PO227<br />

Pule, L. PO254<br />

Puri, A. OC054<br />

Putz, E. OC131<br />

Qiu, H. PO404<br />

Qu, A.N.G. PO371<br />

Quiet, C.A. PO322<br />

Quispe Santibáñez, K. PO209<br />

Quon, H. PO402<br />

Rahnema, S. OC134<br />

Rajagopalan, M.S. OC045, OC073<br />

Rajapakshe, R. PO217<br />

Ramirez, P. PD<strong>12</strong>7<br />

Ramos Aguerri, A. PO419<br />

Ran, W. PO371, PO370, PO242, PO368<br />

Rangeard, L. OC055<br />

Rasch, C.R.N. PD<strong>12</strong>5<br />

Rasheed, A. PO3<strong>12</strong><br />

Rasoda, R. PO213<br />

Rath, G.K. OC042, PO338, PO262, OC133,<br />

PO376<br />

Rauchenwald, M. PO223<br />

Ravi, A. OC091<br />

Rayment, R. PO257<br />

Read, P.W. PO341<br />

Reardon, K.A. PO297, PO341<br />

Reerink, O. PD<strong>12</strong>6<br />

Refaat, T. PO241<br />

Rehman, K. PO251<br />

Reis, L. PO2<strong>12</strong><br />

Reis, T. PO360<br />

Reisner, M.L. PO413<br />

Rekhi, B. OC054<br />

Reniers, B. PO346, PD<strong>12</strong>0, OC140<br />

Resch, A. OC135<br />

Rey, F. PO309<br />

Reynolds, H. PO184<br />

Ribeiro Nuno Ramos, T. PO331<br />

Richard, S. PO363<br />

Richardson, S. PO276, OC115<br />

Richart Sancho, J. PO181<br />

Richart, J. PO204, PO202, PO328<br />

Richaud, P. PO170<br />

Richetto, V. PO308<br />

Ricke, J. <strong>10</strong>0<br />

Rico Osés, M. PO214<br />

Rigante, M. PO416, PO403<br />

Rijnders, A. OC066, PO153<br />

Rimner, A. PO391<br />

Rios, I. PO240<br />

Rishi Kartik, S. PO285<br />

Rivard and C.S. Melhus, M.J. OC067<br />

Rivard, M.J. PO355, PO314, PO378, 94, 93, 20<br />

Rivin del Campo, E. PO196<br />

Roach III, M. OC114, OC029<br />

Rodríguez Villalba, S. PO202<br />

Rodríguez, M.S. PO296<br />

Rodriguez, S. PO204, PO181, PO295, PO291<br />

RodriguezRuiz, M. PO381, OC052<br />

Roesink, J.M. PO235<br />

Rogers and R.M. Thomson, D.W.O.<br />

OC067<br />

Rogge, B. PO418, PO407<br />

Rohant, N. PO318<br />

Røhl, L. OC082<br />

Røhl, L.L. OC039<br />

Rojas, A. OC025<br />

Roldán Arjona, J.M. PO196<br />

Roldán, S. PO220, PO296, PO295, PO291<br />

Rolfingsmeier, J. PO299<br />

Romera, I. PO240<br />

Romero, P. PO214<br />

Rosa, A.A. PO413<br />

Rosa, C.C. PO358<br />

Rosenblatt, E. <strong>10</strong>1, 64<br />

Rosenstein, M. PO316<br />

Rosenzweig, K.E. PO391<br />

Roth, A. OC135<br />

Rovirosa, A. PO240<br />

Rozet, F. PO154<br />

Ruebe, C. PO363<br />

Ruesga Vazquez Daniel, R.V.D. PO406<br />

RuizArrebola, S. PO333<br />

Sabater, S. PO237<br />

Sabbas, A.M. PO382<br />

Sacco, S. PO282, PO185<br />

Sadeghi, A.G. PO322<br />

Saglam, E.K. PO400<br />

Saini, A.S. PO293, PO216, PO292<br />

Saito, S. PO169, PO162<br />

Sakelliou, L. PO337<br />

Sakumi, A. PO167<br />

Salcudean, S. PO213<br />

Salembier, C. PO153<br />

Salgado, L. PO284, PO347<br />

Salmon, H. PO413<br />

Salvador Garrido, N. PO320<br />

Salvajoli, J.V. PO246<br />

San Julián, M. PO381<br />

San Miguel, I. PO381, OC052<br />

Sanchez del Campo, I. PO419


S176 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Sánchez Mazón, J. PO340, PO329<br />

Sander, T. 18<br />

Sandhu, J. OC046<br />

Sandler, H. OC027<br />

Sangalli, G. PO282, PO185<br />

Santos Ortega, M. PO202<br />

Santos, M. PO204, OC053, PO181<br />

Sardi Mabel, S.M. PO377<br />

Sasai, K. PO189<br />

Sathiyan, S. PO247<br />

Sato, M. PO203<br />

Sato, T. PO158<br />

Sauerwein, W. PO361, PO4<strong>12</strong>, 11<br />

Saunders, C. PO323<br />

Sazzad Manir, K. PO245<br />

Scala, L.M. PO200, OC046<br />

Scala, M. OC032<br />

Scanderbeg, D. PO322, OC115, OC113<br />

Scardino, P. OC031<br />

Scepanovic, D. PO384<br />

Schaeken, B. OC066<br />

Schäfer, C. PO397<br />

Schattner, M.A. PO379<br />

Schindel, J. PO339, PO268<br />

Schirra, J. PO397<br />

Schirren, J. PO420<br />

Schlaefer, A. 16<br />

Schleicher, U. PO311<br />

Schmid, M. PO271<br />

Schmidt, E. PO305<br />

Schmidt, M. OC036<br />

Schneider, B.F. PO297<br />

Schneider, M.H. PO363<br />

Schneider, T. PO336, 18<br />

Schwartz, T.H. PO382<br />

Schwarz, J.K. PO299<br />

Scoz, M.C. OC089<br />

Seevinck, P.R. PD119<br />

Seewald, D.H. OC131<br />

Segedin, B. PO261<br />

Sekine, H. PO158<br />

Selbach, H.J. 18<br />

Sempau, J. PO361<br />

Sengoz, M. PO307<br />

Senkesen, O. PO307<br />

Serarslan, B. PO400<br />

Sereni, M. PO218<br />

ServagiVernat, S. PO211<br />

Sethi, A. PO415<br />

Sgouros, G. PO404<br />

Sha, S. OC136<br />

Shah, C. PO229, OC090, OC024, OC092<br />

Shah, M. PO3<strong>12</strong><br />

Sharabura, T.M. PO365<br />

Sharma, A. PO376<br />

Sharma, D.N. OC042, PO338, PO262, OC133<br />

Sharma, N. PO405<br />

Sharma, S. OC042, PO285, PO338, PO262,<br />

OC133<br />

Sharma, S.C. PO376<br />

Shi, J. PO293, PO292<br />

Shi, Y. PO398, PO393<br />

Shimizutani, K. PO369<br />

Shin, E. PO4<strong>10</strong><br />

Shinohara, K. OC029<br />

Shirai, S. PO203<br />

Shiraishi, K. PO167<br />

Shoup, M. PO415<br />

Showalter, T.N. PO199, PO272<br />

Shrivastava, S.K. PO278<br />

Shrivatava, S.K. PO343<br />

Shuin, T. PO207<br />

Shukla, N.K. OC133<br />

Shuryak, I. PO157<br />

Shyamal K, S. PO245<br />

Shylashree, S. PO278<br />

Siauw, T. OC114<br />

Siebert, F. OC142<br />

Siebert, F.A. PO232, PO335, PO153, 94, 20<br />

Simancas, F. PO333<br />

Simeonov, A. PO401<br />

Simões, F. PO2<strong>12</strong><br />

Singh, A. PO4<strong>10</strong><br />

Sioshansi, S. PO314<br />

Sirak, I. PO364, PO150<br />

Sison, C. OC091<br />

Skowronek, J. PO198, PO315<br />

Slobina, E. PO208<br />

Sloboda, R. PO226<br />

Small Jr, W. PO241<br />

Smaniotto, D. PO411<br />

Smith, R.P. PO159<br />

Snee, M. PO373<br />

Snyder, M.B. PO322<br />

Soares, A. PO201<br />

Sola Galarza, A. PO214<br />

Solc, J. PO336<br />

Soldini, P. PO218<br />

Soler, P. OC053<br />

Soliman, P. PD<strong>12</strong>7<br />

Somay, C. PO223<br />

Song, D. OC034<br />

Song, T.L. PO396<br />

Song, W. OC113<br />

Song, X. PO375<br />

Sonoda, Y. OC046<br />

Sonomura, T. PO203<br />

Soroka, A. PO208<br />

Soumarova, R. PO151<br />

Spadinger, I. PO213, PD<strong>12</strong>3<br />

Spiegl, K.J. OC131<br />

Spratt, D.E. OC032<br />

Sroka, R. PO397<br />

Stafford, J. PO227<br />

Stam, T. PO248<br />

Stannard, C. PO4<strong>12</strong>, PO380<br />

Stas, N. PO324<br />

Stathakis, S. PO152<br />

Stauffer, P. PO329<br />

Steenbergen, F. OC077<br />

Steffey, B. PO353, PO274, PO340, PO266,<br />

PO329<br />

Steinberg, M. PO289<br />

Stephens, T. PO157<br />

Stern, H. PO409<br />

Stern, R. PO281<br />

Steuten, L. OC033<br />

Stief, C. PO397<br />

Stieg, P. PO382<br />

Stillie, A. PO253<br />

Stock, R.G. PO149<br />

Stockman, T. PO339, PO268<br />

Stoeckle, E. OC041<br />

Stoianovici, D. OC114<br />

Stojkovski, I. <strong>10</strong>1<br />

Straney, M. PO147<br />

Straube, W. OC027<br />

Strnad, V. OC088, PO177, 138<br />

Stump, K. 93<br />

Sturdza, A. PO271<br />

Sturza, A. <strong>10</strong>7<br />

Suárez Charneco, A. PO186<br />

Suárez Novo, J.F. PO209<br />

Subramani, V. PO338<br />

Sugawara, A. PO156<br />

Sugimoto, A. OC072<br />

Sulyok, Z. OC087<br />

Sumi, M. PO255<br />

Sun Myint, A. PO373<br />

Sun, B. PO299, PO276<br />

Sun, Y. PO395<br />

Sundset, M. OC144<br />

Surry, K. OC072<br />

Surucu, M. PO415<br />

Suslova, V. PO283<br />

Suzuki, K. PO206<br />

Svoboda, A. PO149<br />

Swamidas, J. PO343<br />

Swanson, D.A. PO228, PO227<br />

Swapnendu, B. PO245<br />

Swindell, R. PO230, PO173, OC026<br />

SzmigielTrzcinska, A. PO399, PO176<br />

Taboada Valladares, B. PO320<br />

Taccini, G. PO280<br />

Tadahiko, K. PO190<br />

Tagliaferri, L. PO416, PO411, PO403<br />

Tailleur, A. OC040<br />

TakacsiNagy, Z. OC087<br />

Takahashi, A. PO162<br />

Takahashi, K. PO255<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 177<br />

Takahashi, Y. PO179<br />

Takaki, S. PO163<br />

Takenaka, T. PO160, PO366<br />

Takes, R.P. OC051<br />

Takizawa, K. PO250<br />

Tan, I.B. PD<strong>12</strong>5<br />

Tanaka, E. PO160, PO366<br />

Tanderup, K. OC083, OC069, OC044, OC043,<br />

OC081, OC082, OC039, <strong>10</strong>7, 23, 22<br />

Tanvirpasha, C.R. PO247<br />

Taussky, D. PO182, PO164<br />

Teliyants, A. PO187<br />

Tenconi, C. PO270<br />

Teo, K. PO309<br />

Terk, M. PO157<br />

Tersteeg, J.H.A. PO235<br />

Tessa, M. PO308<br />

Tezcanli, E.T. PO307<br />

Thames, H.D. OC131<br />

Thawani, N. PO408<br />

TherriaultProulx, F. OC070<br />

Thissen, B. OC066<br />

Thomadsen, B. 93<br />

Thomas, L. PO211, PO170, OC041<br />

Thullier, C. PO180<br />

Thwaites, D. OC1<strong>10</strong>, PO345<br />

Tian, S. PO370<br />

Timmermann, B. PO4<strong>12</strong><br />

Todor, D. OC132, OC037<br />

Toita, T. PO250<br />

TomaDasu, I. OC144<br />

Toni, M.P. 18<br />

TopczewskaBruns, J. PO176<br />

Tormo, A. PO220, PO296, PO295, PO291<br />

TorneroLópez, A. PO333<br />

Torresan, R. OC089<br />

Tortajada, M.I. OC053<br />

Tovar Martín, M.I. PO186<br />

Tovar, I. PO269<br />

Tovey, S. PO380<br />

Townamchai, K. PO357, OC086, PO275, PO273<br />

Toya, K. PO169, PO162<br />

Track, C. OC131<br />

Tran, A. PO230<br />

Trauernicht, C.J. PO380<br />

Trichter, S. PO383<br />

Trigo, L. PO284, PO347, PO201<br />

Trombetta, M. 11<br />

Tsalafoutas, I. PO386<br />

Tselis, N. PO420, PO418, PO233, PO407,<br />

OC143<br />

Tsubokura, T. PO166<br />

Tsukamoto, N. PO156<br />

Tsukiyama, I. PO158<br />

Tsung, R. PO197<br />

Ttian, S.Q. PO368<br />

Tunn, U.W. PO233<br />

Turbina, A.V. PO365<br />

Türker, M. PO311<br />

Ueda, M. PO160<br />

Uehara, S. PO158<br />

Ulhman, E. PO2<strong>12</strong><br />

Umayahara, K. PO250<br />

Untereiner, M. PO211<br />

Upasani, M. PO278<br />

Urgesi, A. PO308<br />

Usman, S. PO251<br />

Usmani, N. OC071<br />

Uter, W. OC088<br />

Uthamanthil, R. PO227<br />

Valduvieco, I. PO240<br />

Valentini, V. PO416, PO411, PO403<br />

Valicenti, R. PO281<br />

Vallancien, G. PO154<br />

van 't Riet, A. OC066<br />

van de Kar, M. OC056<br />

van de Pol, S. OC035<br />

van den Bos, W. PD<strong>12</strong>8<br />

van der Grient, J.N. PO205<br />

van der Heide, U.A. PO165<br />

van der Laarse, R. PO205<br />

van der Poel, H.G. PO148<br />

van der SteenBanasik, E.M. PO265<br />

van Deursen, M. PO165<br />

van Gils, F. OC140, PD<strong>12</strong>0<br />

Van Limbergen, E. 138<br />

van Os, R. PO392, OC056<br />

van Rooij, P. PO193<br />

van Vulpen, M. PO172, OC033, PD119, PD<strong>12</strong>6,<br />

PO165<br />

van Wieringen, N. PO205<br />

Vandevender, D. PO415<br />

Vanek, K. PO334<br />

Vanneste, B. OC040, PD<strong>12</strong>5<br />

Varela Cagetti, L. PO419<br />

Varfalvy, N. OC038, PO354<br />

Vargas Arrabal, M.P. PO186<br />

Vargas, P. PO269<br />

Vasconcelos, A. PO286<br />

Vavassori, A. PO319<br />

Vedda, A. OC078<br />

Velema, L. PD<strong>12</strong>8<br />

Venselaar, J. 93<br />

Venselaar, J.L.M. 20<br />

Ventura Bujalance, M. PO209<br />

Vera, R. OC132<br />

Veras, I.M. PO413<br />

Verghis, R. PO147<br />

Vergunst, H. PO148<br />

Verhaegen, F. PO215, PO346, PD<strong>12</strong>0, OC140<br />

Verhoef, L.C. OC051<br />

Verry, C. PO180<br />

Vicini, F.A. OC090, OC092<br />

Viegas, C.M. PO413<br />

Vigneault, E. PO224, OC038, OC038, PO354<br />

Vijande, J. PO328<br />

Vijverberg, P.L.M. PO148<br />

Vila Viñas, M. PO214<br />

Villafranca, E. PO214<br />

Villano, A. PO411<br />

VillavicencioQueijeiro, M. PO406<br />

Vinikovetskaya, A. PO187<br />

Visser, P. PD<strong>12</strong>0<br />

Viswanathan, A. PO305, OC1<strong>12</strong>, PO357, OC086,<br />

PO273, OC047, <strong>10</strong>6<br />

PO275, PO288<br />

Viterbo, T. PO284, PO347, PO201<br />

Vosmik, M. PO150<br />

Vulpen, M. PO148<br />

Vuong, T. OC113<br />

Vyas, S. PO408<br />

Vynckier, S. OC066<br />

Wakatsuki, M. PO277, PO263<br />

Wakil, G. PO154<br />

Wakumoto, Y. PO189<br />

Wallace, M. PO229, OC090<br />

Wanderås, A.D. OC144<br />

Wang, H. PO242, PO367<br />

Wang, J. PO191, PO389, PO371, PO242,<br />

PO367<br />

Wang, J.J. OC075, PO370, PO368<br />

Wang, T. PO402<br />

Wang, W. PO375<br />

Wang, Y. PO375<br />

Wang, Z. PO349<br />

Warden, M.J. PO318<br />

WarrenForward, H. PO260<br />

Wazer, D. OC136<br />

Wazer, D.E. PO314<br />

Webster, M. OC113<br />

Weinberg, R. PO408<br />

Weinberg, V. OC029<br />

Welch, S. OC072<br />

Wernicke, A.G. PO383, PO382, PO259<br />

Westendorp, R. OC035<br />

Whalley, D. PO174<br />

Whitaker, M. PO188<br />

White, S. PO346, OC140<br />

Whitsell, T. PD<strong>12</strong>4<br />

Whittaker, M. PO174<br />

Wick, E. PO4<strong>10</strong><br />

Wiebe, E. OC072<br />

Wild, A. PO402<br />

Wilder, R.B. PO216<br />

Wilkinson, A. PO394<br />

Wilkinson, J.B. OC090, OC092<br />

Williams, N. PO323<br />

Williams, S. PO344, PO184, PO184<br />

Williaume, D. PO211<br />

Wilson, D. OC1<strong>10</strong>


S178 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />

Winship, A. PO287<br />

With, A. PO362<br />

Wittig, A. PO361, PO4<strong>12</strong><br />

Wolf, S. OC142, PO335<br />

Wondergem, J. <strong>10</strong>1<br />

Wong, H. PO373<br />

Wong, R. PO401<br />

Wood, D. PO387<br />

Workman, G. PO147<br />

Wu, A. PO303, PO316, PO234<br />

Wu, A.J. PO391, PO379<br />

Wust, P. PO155<br />

Wylie, J. PO230, PO173, OC026<br />

Xie, J. OC085<br />

Xiong, L. PO161<br />

Yagi, Y. PO169, PO162<br />

Yamada, R. PO203<br />

Yamada, Y. OC031, PD<strong>12</strong>2, PO390, OC032<br />

Yamamoto, H. PO366<br />

Yamamoto, K. PO167<br />

Yamamoto, Y. PO163<br />

Yamasaki, I. PO207<br />

Yamazaki, H. PO166, PO369, PO160, PO366<br />

Yang, J. PO359<br />

Yang, R. PO389, PO371, PO370<br />

Yang, Y. PO355<br />

Yap, M.L. OC085<br />

Yaparpalvi, R. PO303, PO290, PO234<br />

Yashar, C. PO322<br />

Ye, H. PO229, OC024<br />

Yee, D. OC071<br />

Yilmaz, M. PO307<br />

Yoda, K. PO167<br />

Yondorf, M. PO259<br />

Yorozu, A. PO169, PO162<br />

Yoshida, K. PO162, PO369, PO160, PO366<br />

Yoshida, M. PO160, PO366<br />

Yoshimura, Y. PO160<br />

Yoshioka, Y. PO179, PO369<br />

Youssef, A. OC074<br />

Yu, G.Y. PO398, PO396<br />

Yu, Y.A.N. PO370<br />

Yuan, H. PO371, PO242<br />

Yuan, H.S. OC075<br />

Yue, J. PO317<br />

Zahra, M. PO253<br />

Zaider, M. PO390<br />

Zakikhani, R. PO349<br />

Zamboglou, N. PO420, PO418, PO233, PO407,<br />

OC143<br />

Zaragoza, F.J. PO361<br />

Zelefsky, M. OC031, PD<strong>12</strong>2<br />

Zelefsky, M.J. PO200, PO391, OC032<br />

Zettos, A. PO386<br />

Zhang, J. PO398, PO396, PO395, PO393<br />

Zhang, J.G. PO398, PO396, PO395, PO393<br />

Zhang, N. OC114, PO359<br />

Zhang, Z. PO200<br />

Zheng, L. PO398, PO396, PO395, PO393<br />

Zhu, L. PO274, PO371, PO242<br />

Zhu, Y. PO349<br />

Zhumabaeva, A.G. PO365<br />

Ziccarelli, L. PO249<br />

Ziccarelli, P. PO249<br />

Zilli, T. PO182<br />

Zimmermann, J. OC030<br />

Zimmermann, P. OC030<br />

Zoga, E. PO407<br />

ZolciakSiwinska, A. PO306<br />

Zouhar, M. PO150<br />

Zourari, K. PO337<br />

Zubizarreta, E.H. <strong>10</strong>1<br />

Zuchora, A. PO298<br />

Zuo, Y. OC114<br />

Zwierzchowski, G. PO315

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!