World Congress of Brachytherapy 10-12 May, 2012 - Estro-events.org
World Congress of Brachytherapy 10-12 May, 2012 - Estro-events.org
World Congress of Brachytherapy 10-12 May, 2012 - Estro-events.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
WCB<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong><br />
<strong>10</strong>-<strong>12</strong> <strong>May</strong>, 20<strong>12</strong><br />
Barcelona, Spain
Cover photo: © Fotolia / Hugues Argence
WCB<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong><br />
<strong>10</strong>-<strong>12</strong> <strong>May</strong>, 20<strong>12</strong> • Barcelona, Spain
WCB 20<strong>12</strong> content<br />
Thursday <strong>10</strong> <strong>May</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
Symposium<br />
Welcome and introduction<br />
Modern brachytherapy: role <strong>of</strong> new image modalities (Abs. 1-6)<br />
Panel session<br />
Prospective trials for partial breast irradiation (Abs. 7-11)<br />
Award lecture<br />
Marie Curie medal presentation (Abs. <strong>12</strong>-13)<br />
Panel session<br />
Prostate 1: Is there a role for primary focal therapy? (Abs. 14-17)<br />
Physics 1: Dose to water calibration (Abs. 18-20)<br />
Gynaecology 1: Are we decreasing morbidity with image-guided brachytherapy? (Abs. 21-23)<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>fered papers<br />
Prostate 1 (Abs. 24-29)<br />
Prostate 2 (Abs. 30-38)<br />
Gynaecology 1 (Abs. 39-47)<br />
Friday 11 <strong>May</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
Symposium<br />
Radiobiological modelling in brachytherapy: clinical relevance? (Abs. 48-50)<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>fered papers<br />
Miscellaneous (Abs. 51-56)<br />
Debate<br />
Key controversies on patient selection for partial breast irradiation (Abs. 57-58)<br />
Panel session<br />
2: A perspective on health economics in brachytherapy (Abs. 59-64)<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>fered papers<br />
Physics 1 (Abs. 65-70)<br />
Poster<br />
Poster highlights (Abs. 71-78)<br />
Panel session<br />
Prostate 2: Salvage treatment after brachytherapy failure (Abs. 79-80)
Pr<strong>of</strong>fered papers<br />
Gynaecology 2 (Abs. 81-86)<br />
Breast 1 (Abs. 87-92)<br />
Panel session<br />
Physics 2: Uncertainties in brachytherapy and how to report them? (Abs. 93-95)<br />
Symposium<br />
How to improve safety in brachytherapy? Practical examples (Abs. 96-97)<br />
Saturday <strong>12</strong> <strong>May</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
Symposium<br />
New opportunities with robotic, endoscopic and radiological interventions (Abs. 98-<strong>10</strong>0)<br />
Role <strong>of</strong> IAEA and UICC in brachytherapy training (Abs. <strong>10</strong>1-<strong>10</strong>2)<br />
Skin brachytherapy (Abs. <strong>10</strong>3-<strong>10</strong>5)<br />
Panel session<br />
Gynaecology 2: Emerging evidence for image-based brachytherapy in cervical cancer (Abs. <strong>10</strong>6-<strong>10</strong>9)<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>fered papers<br />
Physics 2 (Abs. 1<strong>10</strong>-115)<br />
Panel session<br />
Physics 3: The advantages and criticalities <strong>of</strong> new dose calculation algorithms (Abs. 116-118)<br />
Poster discussion<br />
Session 1 (Abs. 119-<strong>12</strong>8)<br />
Panel session<br />
Gynaecology 3: Optimal adjuvant treatment for intermediate risk endometrial cancer (Abs. <strong>12</strong>9-130)<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>fered papers<br />
Breast 2 (Abs. 131-136)<br />
Panel session<br />
3: Repeat breast conservation with brachytherapy (Abs. 137-138)<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>fered papers<br />
Physics 3 (Abs. 139-144)<br />
Symposium<br />
One hundred years <strong>of</strong> prostate brachytherapy (Abs. 146)<br />
Posters<br />
Prostate (Abs. 147-233)<br />
Gynaecology (Abs. 234-3<strong>10</strong>)<br />
Breast (Abs. 311-325)<br />
Physics (Abs. 326-362)<br />
Miscellaneous (Abs. 363-420)
1<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
C.HaieMeder<br />
Institut Gustave Roussy, Radiation Oncology, Villejuif, France<br />
Target volume determination is probably one <strong>of</strong> the most challenging<br />
issues in radiation oncology, at the era <strong>of</strong> highly targeted<br />
radiotherapy. BT has to face this challenge, even in a more accurate<br />
way, as BT physical and biological properties provide the most<br />
conformal and normal tissue sparing radiotherapy technique. To reach<br />
this goal, BT has benefited from recent advanced imaging<br />
technologies. The use <strong>of</strong> 3D techniques for BT dosimetry has increased<br />
during the recent years, mainly CTbased, but also using MRI, PETCT<br />
and ultrasound. Image guidance improves tumor and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk<br />
visualization, and their relationship with the applicator (in<br />
gynecological tumors), representing the basis for 3D and 4D BT<br />
treatments plans.<br />
Prostate BT was developed using ultrasound guidance. The accuracy<br />
<strong>of</strong> seed placement and dosevolume parameters has significantly<br />
improved with more sophisticated imaging modalities. Emerging<br />
techniques in ultrasound and MRI modalities, including functional<br />
imaging, as well as 3D digital mapping, allow for more accurate<br />
disease characterization with improvement in staging and<br />
management <strong>of</strong> the tumor. This issue represents the basis for dose<br />
painting.<br />
In cervical cancer BT, MRI based adaptive BT enables 4D target<br />
volume optimization with appropriate dosevolume constraints for<br />
<strong>org</strong>ans at risk. First clinical series report an improvement in local<br />
control which seems to translate into a survival benefit. Ultrasound is<br />
an evolving field and is currently under study. The value <strong>of</strong> functional<br />
MRI or PETCT is also under investigation.<br />
In endometrial cancer, postoperative BT has become the new<br />
standard in intermediaterisk patients. In this situation, there is a<br />
potential for imagebased individualization which is under<br />
investigation.<br />
Apart from these two main tumor sites, BT using new imaging<br />
modalities has been developed in other fields, such as breast, head<br />
and neck and endoluminal (bronchus, oesophagus).<br />
In the last decade, the use <strong>of</strong> imaging modalities integrated into the<br />
BT procedure has led to a significant increase <strong>of</strong> BT all over the world.<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> images also led to the development <strong>of</strong> BT guidelines,<br />
allowing multiinstitutional studies, contributing to clinical research<br />
and scientific publications.<br />
2<br />
ROLE OF FUNCTIONAL IMAGING<br />
B. Carey 1<br />
1<br />
St James Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS<br />
Trust, Radiology, Leeds, United Kingdom<br />
The evolution <strong>of</strong> the art <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy into a precision form <strong>of</strong><br />
scientifically based radiation therapy owes much to major<br />
developments in imaging and computer technology over the past<br />
decade. <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> <strong>of</strong>fers the most conformal <strong>of</strong> all forms <strong>of</strong><br />
radiotherapy and is designed largely around the intricate relationships<br />
between radiation dose delivered, target volume and fractionation<br />
regimes. Traditional brachytherapy planning techniques have<br />
benefited enormously from morphological imaging techniques such as<br />
Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound.<br />
Tumour volumetricbased radiation planning based on better anatomy<br />
has much improved our ability to target malignant tissue whilst<br />
sparing nonmalignant tissues. 3D target localisation has been<br />
successfully modelled around a hierarchy <strong>of</strong> expanding treatment<br />
volumes based on the demonstrable tumour morphology as well as<br />
allowing for technical imperfections and variations in treatment<br />
delivery. A new paradigm for treatment planning and radiation<br />
delivery is now becoming possible with the ability <strong>of</strong> medical imaging<br />
<br />
<br />
to define areas <strong>of</strong> varying functional activity within the presumed<br />
tumour mass.<br />
A new probability envelope is emerging based on our recognition <strong>of</strong><br />
the altered biological and molecular processes occurring in tumour<br />
tissue. A biological target volume can be identified generally as a<br />
subset or subsets <strong>of</strong> the morphological target volume and <strong>of</strong>fers a<br />
potentially modified approach for brachytherapy. These new<br />
functional maps <strong>of</strong> the tumour provide the basis for a very innovative<br />
approach to radiation treatment using much more selective planning<br />
and treatment delivery techniques. Locating and quantifying areas <strong>of</strong><br />
cellular and molecular disruptions within the tumour mass <strong>of</strong>fer the<br />
potential to individualise the radiotherapy treatment and the highly<br />
conformal and adaptive nature <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy perhaps stands to<br />
gain most from these new functional imaging techniques.<br />
FDGPET has become an established imaging technique in oncology<br />
and is becoming increasingly integrated into treatment planning<br />
processes for several common tumour sites. Newer isotopes are being<br />
developed to further expand the depth and range <strong>of</strong> our knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />
tumour behaviour and will <strong>of</strong>fer future targets for brachytherapy dose<br />
delivery and modifications. Functional MRI is providing us with<br />
additional physiological surrogate targets for dose modifications.<br />
Newer developments in functional Ultrasound and CT will also<br />
enhance the information available to the radiation oncologist and<br />
yield a much more detailed map <strong>of</strong> tumour architecture and function.<br />
The inherent goal <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy is to safely deliver adequate<br />
radiation to those areas <strong>of</strong> tumour tissue that are considered<br />
necessary based on our current understanding <strong>of</strong> tumour biology and<br />
radiation response. Functional imaging <strong>of</strong>fers us a way forward in<br />
identifying subvolumes <strong>of</strong> tumour that may benefit from different<br />
radiation regimes based on different measurements <strong>of</strong> tumour<br />
response. Furthermore, we have the future potential to noninvasively<br />
assess these treatment responses in terms <strong>of</strong> altered cellular and<br />
molecular processes as well as altered tumour morphology. These are<br />
exciting times for functional imaging based brachytherapy.<br />
3<br />
PET IMAGING IN BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
V. Lowe 1<br />
1 <strong>May</strong>o Clinic, <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Rochester, USA<br />
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is now being widely in the<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> many types <strong>of</strong> malignancy. Multiple studies have<br />
demonstrated the utility <strong>of</strong> PET in oncologic imaging in better staging<br />
<strong>of</strong> disease, earlier treatment response assessment and better<br />
characterization <strong>of</strong> recurrent disease over what can be done with<br />
anatomic imaging methods alone. The availability metabolic<br />
substrates other than FDG makes PET imaging attractive in some<br />
tumors that have been otherwise poorly evaluated by FDG. This talk<br />
will discuss the use <strong>of</strong> Choline PET imaging with discussion <strong>of</strong> how it<br />
can be used in conjunction with brachytherapy<br />
While prostate cancer cells have not ubiquitously shown FDG avidity,<br />
increased choline uptake has been a more consistent finding on PET<br />
imaging. Cancer cells have more rapid cell proliferation than normal<br />
cells. New cells require the building blocks for cell membranes.<br />
Choline is a watersoluble essential nutrient grouped with B<br />
complex vitamins—that is vital for a) cell membrane structure and<br />
signaling b) synthesis <strong>of</strong> neurotransmitters and c) general metabolism.<br />
[ 11 C]choline is a synthetic form <strong>of</strong> choline that releases positrons by<br />
beta decay that can be visualized by PET. [ 18 F]choline is another<br />
radionuclide version <strong>of</strong> choline that can also be used in PET imaging.<br />
The increased accumulation <strong>of</strong> these agents by prostate cancer in any<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the body is a reliable way to determine the extent <strong>of</strong> prostate<br />
cancer.<br />
Choline PET can be use in two different treatment time points in<br />
prostate cancer related to brachytherapy. At initial staging,<br />
confirmation <strong>of</strong> localized disease to the prostate bed can be<br />
performed using choline PET. Choline PET provides high accuracy for<br />
the detection <strong>of</strong> distant metastasis. This can aid in treatment<br />
planning. Choline PET may be most useful in the situation <strong>of</strong><br />
definitively treated prostate cancer with the discovery <strong>of</strong> biochemical<br />
recurrence. One <strong>of</strong> the clinical dilemmas <strong>of</strong> biochemical recurrence <strong>of</strong><br />
prostate cancer is the how to decide on an optimal treatment
S2 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
strategy. Assessment <strong>of</strong> the prostate bed post brachytherapy is<br />
accurately performed by Choline PET. In this situation other imaging<br />
modalities are modestly compromised. This assessment by choline Pet<br />
<strong>of</strong> the treatment outcome <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> the prostate is<br />
probably best performed after the PSA nadir postbrachytherapy.<br />
Choline PET imaging in prostate cancer is one example <strong>of</strong> how PET<br />
imaging can be used to assess treatment planning and outcome <strong>of</strong><br />
brachytherapy.<br />
4<br />
MRI: IMPACT ON BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
I.M. JürgenliemkSchulz 1<br />
1 U.M.C. Utrecht, Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />
The combined key words “MRI” and “brachytherapy (BT)” give PubMed<br />
hits from 1984 onwards. Since then the amount <strong>of</strong> positive hits is<br />
increasing, reflecting the relevance <strong>of</strong> MR information for BT<br />
developments. Nowadays MRI is especially used for BT treatment<br />
planning and/or optimization in prostate, cervix and brain tumors. In<br />
other tumor sites like head and neck, sarcomas, breast, endometrial<br />
and rectal cancer MRI is catching up. During the years we see a<br />
development from low magnetic field strength machines and<br />
anatomical imaging to high field equipment allowing more precise<br />
anatomical and additional functional sequences. And approaches for<br />
interventional MR imaging during BT procedures are coming up.<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> all this effort is to optimize treatment strategies so that<br />
better control and outcome can be obtained by radiotherapy. MRI is<br />
used for improvement <strong>of</strong> all steps in the BT chain, which are: defining<br />
and contouring tumor targets and OAR at time <strong>of</strong> BT; reconstruction<br />
<strong>of</strong> source carriers (applicators/needles/tube/seeds); (pre) treatment<br />
planning optimization; monitoring application/implant quality;<br />
monitoring application/implant stability during treatment; monitoring<br />
regression and deformation during treatment; evaluation <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />
outcome (responses, control and related side effects).<br />
MRI does not completely replace clinical investigation and other<br />
imaging modalities, but its superior s<strong>of</strong>t tissue contrast <strong>of</strong>ten helps to<br />
better define target volume extension and tumor stage at time <strong>of</strong><br />
diagnosis, at time <strong>of</strong> BT and for treatment planning purposes. It<br />
facilitates BT in developing volume based treatment planning<br />
concepts comparable to EBRT. One <strong>of</strong> these concepts, for example is<br />
published as GEC ESTRO recommendations for MRI guided gyn BT.<br />
Repeated MRI imaging during and after EBRT helps to individually<br />
determine the amount <strong>of</strong> tumor regression, allowing if necessary<br />
individualized planning <strong>of</strong> the BT boosts. In these cases, but also when<br />
BT is the primary treatment approach, preBT MR information can<br />
influence the choice for applicators, amount <strong>of</strong> needles, tubes or<br />
seeds, their insertion depths and spatial distributions.<br />
During the last years new MR sequences and MR markers have been<br />
developed that provide possibilities for direct source carrier<br />
reconstructions making additional CT scans or Xray investigations<br />
unnecessary. Additionally, MRI allows more detailed monitoring the<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> BT applications and implants. Applicator induced<br />
perforations or suboptimal needle insertions for example, can easily<br />
be detected and corrected if necessary and feasible. Repeated MRI<br />
imaging helps to monitor the robustness <strong>of</strong> applications and implants<br />
during treatment. It allows to detect changes in the position <strong>of</strong><br />
applicators/needles/tubes with respect to the targets and OAR and to<br />
recalculate DVH parameters. These changes can occur as inter or<br />
intrafraction variations, can change the dose volume parameters and<br />
can influence treatment outcome. Detection <strong>of</strong> these uncertainties<br />
will help to better understand the relations <strong>of</strong> dose volume<br />
parameters with tumor control and treatment complication<br />
probabilities. Target volume response and control monitoring is also<br />
possible with MRI. In case <strong>of</strong> recurrences it helps to find relations with<br />
spatial dose distributions and treatment field borders. There are<br />
indications that especially functional MRI is valuable in early detection<br />
<strong>of</strong> (recurrent) tumor and focal salvage treatments. Functional MRI<br />
sequences help to better understand differences in tumor biology and<br />
the relations between dose and response in a more individualized<br />
way.<br />
In conclusion, during the last years we see a development towards MR<br />
guided BT in different tumor sites. Anatomical and functional MRI<br />
information supports the different parts <strong>of</strong> the BT chain, helps to<br />
optimize and individualize BT approaches and allows more detailed<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> treatment outcome.<br />
5<br />
MODERN BRACHYTHERAPY: ROLE OF ULTRASOUND<br />
P. Hoskin 1<br />
1<br />
Mount Vernon Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Northwood Middlesex,<br />
United Kingdom<br />
Ultrasound is not a new imaging modality but the recent<br />
developments in image guided brachytherapy have found that<br />
ultrasound is an ideal tool for many <strong>of</strong> the requirements these new<br />
techniques demand. The advantages <strong>of</strong> ultrasound are that it has no<br />
radiation exposure, and it is readily available, portable and can be<br />
used as a real time imaging modality during implantation. Whilst it<br />
may not achieve the levels <strong>of</strong> normal tissue definition, now achieved<br />
with modern CT and MRI, image fusion techniques enable the<br />
advantages <strong>of</strong> ultrasound to be combined with other more<br />
sophisticated imaging techniques.<br />
In brachytherapy ultrasound has a role in prostate, gynaecological and<br />
interstitial brachytherapy at other sites. Developments in ultrasound<br />
were fundamental to the rise in activity seen in prostate<br />
brachytherapy in recent years based on the transrectal ultrasound<br />
guided transperineal implant technique. As the technique has matured<br />
further developments in ultrasound technology with three dimensional<br />
imaging and integration with modern dosimety algorithms which has<br />
been incorporated into routine prostate brachytherapy.<br />
In gynaecological brachytherapy, transabdominal ultrasound provides<br />
excellent imaging <strong>of</strong> the uterus during placement <strong>of</strong> an intrauterine<br />
tube and vaginal sources. This ensures accurate and safe implantation<br />
whilst minimising the risk <strong>of</strong> perforation. In recent years, image<br />
guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer has become established as<br />
the standard <strong>of</strong> care. Whilst the GEC ESTRO recommendations are<br />
based on MR and CT imaging, it has been found that high quality<br />
ultrasound based 3D imaging is equally effective enabling<br />
individualised dosimety to a defined CTV based on ultrasound<br />
appearances fulfilling the GEC ESTRO dose volume requirements.<br />
Interstitial brachytherapy remains an important treatment modality<br />
for many sites including the vagina, vulva, anal canal, rectum and<br />
breast. In these sites ultrasound is again an important imaging<br />
modality enabling accurate placement <strong>of</strong> afterloading catheters with<br />
real time imaging during the implant procedure.<br />
There are continued efforts to improve the technology behind the use<br />
<strong>of</strong> ultrasound and optimisation <strong>of</strong> the imaging parameters is essential.<br />
In prostate brachytherapy use <strong>of</strong> bi plane ultrasound transducers with<br />
transverse and longitudinal modes is now routine and optimal imaging<br />
parameters have been defined to obtain accurate needle insertion<br />
depth with reduced beam width artefacts. The role <strong>of</strong> contrast<br />
agents is also important with studies showing improved accuracy in<br />
definition <strong>of</strong> urethral anatomy using air filled gel. Other new<br />
developments include elastography which may prove beneficial in<br />
indentifying tumour bearing areas distinct from normal prostate gland<br />
based on the tissue stiffness.<br />
Access to high quality ultrasound should be a fundamental component<br />
<strong>of</strong> any brachytherapy programme. It provides high quality real time<br />
imaging resulting in accurate high quality implants which will<br />
translate into good patient outcomes.<br />
6<br />
CONCLUSION IMAGEGUIDED BRACHYTHERAPY FUTURE AND<br />
EVALUATION<br />
J. Dimopoulos 1<br />
1 Metropolitan Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Athens, Greece<br />
During the last two decades there were numerous attempts to<br />
integrate modern imaging (CT, PET, PETCT, MRI, MRS, US) into the<br />
brachytherapy treatment chain. It is evident that advanced imaging<br />
was the driving force for the entire evolution process <strong>of</strong><br />
brachytherapy as it is applied for different sites.<br />
The rationale <strong>of</strong> imageguided brachytherapy was to use images to<br />
define the target <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy prior to any treatment and prior to<br />
the brachytherapy intervention. The placement, with high accuracy,<br />
<strong>of</strong> the brachytherapy applicators (e.g. interstitial needles) was guided<br />
by the acquisition <strong>of</strong> images by either utilizing a “step by step”<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 3<br />
procedure (e.g. CT, MRI) or by utilizing a “real time” approach (e.g.<br />
US). The subsequent aim was to maximize the dose to the targets and<br />
to minimize the dose to any adjacent <strong>org</strong>an at risk. The latter was<br />
realized with the integration <strong>of</strong> images into the treatment planning<br />
procedure. Finally, the generation <strong>of</strong> dosevolume parameters for the<br />
targets and the <strong>org</strong>ans at risk and the correlation <strong>of</strong> these DVH<br />
parameters with measurable clinical outcome parameters enabled the<br />
prediction <strong>of</strong> disease control probability and normal tissue<br />
complication probability.<br />
Ultrasound is the imaging modality <strong>of</strong> choice for the treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
prostate cancer patients with low and high dose rate brachytherapy.<br />
Its unique position has to be ascribed to its capability to provide “real<br />
time” images during the implantation procedure. The development <strong>of</strong><br />
dedicated treatment planning systems supported the exploitation <strong>of</strong><br />
the potential <strong>of</strong> this approach. The development <strong>of</strong> a systematic<br />
methodology and the collection <strong>of</strong> clinical experience with treatment<br />
results on thousands <strong>of</strong> patients established the procedure as the<br />
golden standard.<br />
Recent investigations studied the issue <strong>of</strong> using MR spectroscopy<br />
information for treatment planning <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer brachytherapy.<br />
The aim was to detect the topographic position <strong>of</strong> malignant lesions<br />
within the prostate in order to use this information for dose escalation<br />
purposes. The majority <strong>of</strong> these studies employed 1 H MRS due to the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> efficient water and fatsuppression techniques. It<br />
seems that further improvement regarding signaltonoise ratio with<br />
smaller voxel dimension, improved spatial resolution and more precise<br />
metabolite maps is required. MR spectroscopyguided adaptive<br />
brachytherapy for prostate cancer is however, not widely available<br />
yet and will eventually be used in future studies to evaluate the<br />
clinical advantages <strong>of</strong> this treatment approach.<br />
The integration <strong>of</strong> functional imaging, mainly PET and PETCT, into<br />
the brachytherapy treatment planning procedure was mainly<br />
restricted to patients with cervical cancer. Preliminary data from<br />
dosimetric studies showed that the method is feasible, but its clinical<br />
impact is not yet clearly defined.<br />
MRIguided adaptive brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> cervical cancer represents,<br />
besides USguided brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer, the most<br />
extensively studied imageguided brachytherapy approach. The<br />
method was developed systematically and each <strong>of</strong> the above<br />
mentioned steps <strong>of</strong> imageguidance was carefully integrated into the<br />
procedure. The clinical impact for the patients was remarkable, local<br />
control for locally advanced disease was ~90%, with less than 5%<br />
serious late adverse effects. As a consequence, the procedure was<br />
considered as the golden standard for these patients.<br />
The wide application <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy for accelerated partial breast<br />
irradiation allowed the systematic application <strong>of</strong> CTguidance for<br />
breast brachytherapy. It seems, however, that further research is<br />
needed to clarify some issues regarding the methodology <strong>of</strong> this<br />
approach.<br />
Future clinical studies will have to determine whether the integration<br />
<strong>of</strong> advanced imaging (e.g. biological and functional imaging) into the<br />
different steps <strong>of</strong> the brachytherapy treatment chain as applied for<br />
different sites will result into a significant clinical benefit for the<br />
patient. Until then US and MRI which are widely applicable and<br />
systematically utilized for prostate and cervical cancer, respectively<br />
will represent the golden standard.<br />
<br />
<br />
7<br />
EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE<br />
C. Polgár 1<br />
1 National Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Radiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary<br />
Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an attractive treatment<br />
approach which shortens the course <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy (RT) to less than<br />
a week. There has been great interest in Europe in treating selected<br />
patients with earlystage breast cancer with APBI using different<br />
techniques. Among these we review the results <strong>of</strong> European studies<br />
using brachytherapy (BT), and teletherapy techniques. The results <strong>of</strong><br />
clinical trials using intraoperative RT (ELIOT and TARGIT) for<br />
delivering APBI will be presented separately by others.<br />
Six early studies had local recurrence (LR) rates <strong>of</strong> 637% yielding<br />
annual LR rates ranging from 1.4% to 6.2% with 5083% <strong>of</strong> patients<br />
having excellent or good cosmetic results, reflecting suboptimal<br />
patient selection, target definition, and quality assurance procedures<br />
(Table 1.). Twelve more recent studies performed using much more<br />
stringent approaches have had LR rates <strong>of</strong> 011% yielding annual LR<br />
rates ranging from 0% to 1.1% with 56<strong>10</strong>0% <strong>of</strong> patients having<br />
excellent or good cosmetic results (Table 1.).<br />
The <strong>10</strong>year results <strong>of</strong> a singleinstitution phase III study and<br />
preliminary results on early toxicities <strong>of</strong> the GECESTRO multicentric<br />
phase III APBI trial will be presented later during the <strong>World</strong><br />
<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> <strong>Congress</strong>.<br />
Recently, two other European phase III trials (the IMPORT LOW and<br />
the Florence University trials) have been initiated using IMRT in the<br />
APBI arm. As data from these and other trials mature, they will<br />
address and refine issues <strong>of</strong> patient selection, target volume<br />
definition, total dose, and fractionation and hopefully support the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> APBI into the routine clinical practice.<br />
8<br />
NORTH AMERICAN EXPERIENCE<br />
D.W. Arthur<br />
Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA<br />
The North American accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI)<br />
experience will be represented in this presentation by review <strong>of</strong><br />
select prospective single institutional, multiinstitutional and<br />
randomized studies. In addition, clinical investigations evaluating how<br />
to expand and improve the present use <strong>of</strong> APBI will be discussed.<br />
Outcome data from William Beaumont Hospital, Virginia<br />
Commonwealth University, RTOG and the American Society <strong>of</strong> Breast<br />
Surgeons Registry trial, all now with extended followup <strong>of</strong> 5<strong>12</strong> years,<br />
continue to support the use <strong>of</strong> APBI in selected patients. Acceptable<br />
inbreast control and toxicity rate are reported from these trials and<br />
lay the foundation for the use <strong>of</strong> APBI. To further validate the use <strong>of</strong><br />
APBI, the results <strong>of</strong> two large phase III randomized trials are awaited.<br />
The Canadian trial randomized between standard whole breast and<br />
3Dconformal external beam partial breast has completed accrual and<br />
data maturation is awaited. The American NSABP B39/RTOG 0413<br />
trial continues to accrue and is approaching anticipated conclusion in<br />
early 2013. This phase III trial has included a wide range <strong>of</strong> patients<br />
who have been randomized between standard whole breast irradiation<br />
and APBI that can be delivered with mulitcatheter interstitial<br />
technique, intracavitary technique or 3DConformal external beam<br />
radiotherapy. It is the only phase III trial that is evaluating the<br />
boundaries <strong>of</strong> patient selection. As these important trials come to a<br />
close and we await results, further acceleration <strong>of</strong> treatment delivery
S4 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
and the use <strong>of</strong> partial breast treatment for reirradiation are being<br />
investigated. Two ongoing trials that are evaluating these concepts<br />
will be presented. A multiinstitutional trial investigating a twoday<br />
treatment delivery scheme has become the focus <strong>of</strong> study allowing<br />
the APBI treatment device to be inplace for only 23 days and an<br />
RTOG trial is evaluating the role <strong>of</strong> partial breast reirradiation in<br />
those patients experiencing an inbreast failure after whole breast<br />
irradiation.<br />
9<br />
TARGIT<br />
D.J. Joseph 1<br />
1 Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Perth, Australia<br />
: After breastconserving surgery (BCS), 90% <strong>of</strong> local<br />
recurrences (LR) occur within the index quadrant despite the<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> multicentric cancers elsewhere in the breast. Thus,<br />
restriction <strong>of</strong> radiation therapy to the tumour bed during surgery<br />
might be adequate for selected patients. We compared targeted<br />
intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) utilizing the Intrabeam Device,<br />
with conventional whole breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).<br />
IORT involves an xray source small enough to be placed inside a<br />
tumour bed to deliver its treatment. A series <strong>of</strong> applicators <strong>of</strong> varying<br />
diameters allows the correct size to be chosen for any surgical cavity<br />
after BCS. Low energy 50 kilovolt xrays are produced which have<br />
limited penetration, so deliver a dose that is relatively high at the<br />
applicator surface but falls <strong>of</strong>f rapidly with distance. We prescribe a<br />
dose <strong>of</strong> 20Gy at the applicator surface, given in a single treatment.<br />
The procedure lengthens theatre time by 2030 minutes, but<br />
otherwise there are few logistical issues.<br />
: Having safely piloted the technique <strong>of</strong> IORT, Sir Charles<br />
Gairdner Hospital (SCGH) and the Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute<br />
joined the international TARGITA trial in 2003. In this prospective,<br />
randomised, noninferiority trial, women aged 45 years or older with<br />
invasive ductal breast carcinoma undergoing BCS were enrolled from<br />
28 centres in nine countries. Participating centres were able to define<br />
stricter eligibility criteria, and the two Australian centres chose to<br />
include only postmenopausal women over 50 due to their lower risk<br />
<strong>of</strong> LR. Patients were randomly assigned to receive targeted IORT or<br />
EBRT. Postoperative discovery <strong>of</strong> predefined factors (eg, lobular<br />
carcinoma) could trigger addition <strong>of</strong> EBRT to IORT (in an expected 15%<br />
<strong>of</strong> patients). The primary outcome was LR in the conserved breast.<br />
The predefined noninferiority margin was an absolute difference <strong>of</strong><br />
2 5% in the primary endpoint.<br />
: 387 patients have been registered on the trial in Australia.<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> the first 1113 patients randomly allocated to IORT and<br />
1119 allocated to EBRT was performed in early 20<strong>10</strong>. Of 996 patients<br />
who received the allocated treatment in the IORT group, 854 (86%)<br />
received IORT only and 142 (14%) received IORT plus EBRT. <strong>10</strong>25 (92%)<br />
patients in the EBRT group received the allocated treatment. At 4<br />
years, there were six LRs in the IORT group and five in the EBRT<br />
group. The KaplanMeier estimate <strong>of</strong> LR in the conserved breast at 4<br />
years was 1 20% (95% CI 0 53–2 71) in the IORT group and 0 95% (0 39–<br />
2 31) in the EBRT group. The frequency <strong>of</strong> any complications and<br />
major toxicity was similar in the two groups. Radiotherapy toxicity<br />
(Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 3) was lower in the IORT<br />
group (six patients [0 5%]) than in the EBRT group (23 patients [2 1%];<br />
p=0 002). Recent blinded analysis has shown no significant change in<br />
LR for the total cohort. A further unblinded analysis is planned for<br />
late 20<strong>12</strong>. Recruitment is ongoing as it was continued beyond the<br />
initial target to allow further centres to join the trial. Long term<br />
followup is planned.<br />
: In accordance to ASCO literature and discussion with<br />
the data monitoring and safety committee and local specialists, IORT<br />
is now considered a standard treatment option for women over 70<br />
with low risk disease in Western Australia.<br />
<strong>10</strong><br />
ELIOT TRIALS IN MILAN: RESULTS<br />
R.Orecchia<br />
European Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Milan, Italy<br />
Abstract not received<br />
11<br />
LONG TERM RESULTS AND ONGOING TRIALS OF PERMANENT BREAST<br />
SEED IMPLANT<br />
J. Pignol 1 , S. Doggett 2 , J. Crook 3 , M. Trombetta 4 , J.M. Caudrelier 5 , P.<br />
Fried 6 , S. Hussein 7 , A. Dagnault 8 , N. Pervez 9 , W. Sauerwein <strong>10</strong><br />
1<br />
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre University <strong>of</strong> Toronto, Radiation<br />
Oncology, Toronto, Canada<br />
2<br />
Tustin Hospital and Medical Centre, Radiation Oncology, Tustin, USA<br />
3<br />
BCCA Center for the Southern Interior University <strong>of</strong> British<br />
Columbia, Radiation Oncology, Kelowna, Canada<br />
4<br />
Allegheny General Hospital Temple University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine,<br />
Radiation Oncology, Pittsburgh, USA<br />
5<br />
Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre University <strong>of</strong> Ottawa, Radiation<br />
Oncology, Ottawa, Canada<br />
6<br />
The Jewish Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Cincinnati, USA<br />
7<br />
Tom Baker Cancer Centre University <strong>of</strong> Calgary, Radiation Oncology,<br />
Calgary, Canada<br />
8<br />
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec, Radiation Oncology,<br />
Quebec, Canada<br />
9<br />
Cross Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, Edmonton, Canada<br />
<strong>10</strong><br />
University Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Essen, Germany<br />
Permanent Breast Seeds Implant (PBSI) is a form <strong>of</strong> partial breast<br />
irradiation technique involving the permanent implantation <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong>3 Pd<br />
stranded seeds under ultrasound guidance and light anaesthesia in a<br />
single one hour procedure. PBSI delivers the radiation treatment over<br />
several weeks and is hence low dose rate brachytherapy.<br />
The technique has been prospectively tested in a Phase I/II clinical<br />
trial. From 2004 to 2007, early stage breast cancer patients referred<br />
to a single cancer centre for adjuvant radiotherapy were <strong>of</strong>fered PBSI.<br />
Eligible patients included those over 45 years old diagnosed with an<br />
infiltrating ductal carcinoma £ 3 cm, margins ≥ 2 mm, no grade III, no<br />
lobular components, no extensive in situ carcinoma, no<br />
lymphovascular invasion, and negative lymph nodes. In 2009, when<br />
mature data showed good tolerance and the absence <strong>of</strong> local<br />
recurrence at 5 years, a multicentre registry trial was activated<br />
<strong>of</strong>fering PBSI to the same population but aged 50 or higher. Finally in<br />
20<strong>10</strong> a multicentre Phase II trial <strong>of</strong> adjuvant PBSI for selected DCIS<br />
was activated in Canada.<br />
Overall 111 patients have received PBSI, including 98 with infiltrating<br />
ductal carcinoma (IDC), one patient with mixed infiltrating lobular<br />
and ductal carcinoma, and <strong>12</strong> patients with DCIS. The median age at<br />
time <strong>of</strong> surgery was 61 years [range 41 to 80 years]. The median<br />
tumour size was 1.0 cm [0.2 to 3.0 cm]. Regarding the 99 patients<br />
with invasive tumour, all were node negative but one, the median<br />
free surgical margin size was 5 mm [1 to 40 mm], half <strong>of</strong> the tumour<br />
were MSBR grade I and the other half were grade II, 83/99 patients<br />
received adjuvant antihormone therapy and <strong>12</strong>/99 chemotherapy.<br />
The median followup for the entire cohort is 62 months [5 to 98<br />
months]. At 80 months the overall survival is 97.3% ± STD 1.9%, and<br />
the recurrence free survival was 91.9% ± STD 3.9%. Three patients<br />
presented with ipsilateral breast recurrence; two IDC at 5.5 and 7<br />
years and one DCIS at 6.5 years post surgery. Three patients also<br />
presented with contralateral breast cancers, two IDC and one DCIS.<br />
The single patient with a positive node developed a regional<br />
recurrence at 6 years, and one patient presented with lung metastasis<br />
after 4 years. Two patients died <strong>of</strong> diabetic complications unrelated<br />
to the implant?. Two year tolerance data are available for 78 patients<br />
and none presented with a toxicity <strong>of</strong> grade II ( NIH CTCAE 4.0; local<br />
intervention required and/or limiting instrumental activity <strong>of</strong> daily<br />
life) or higher. Twenty four patients presented with grade I side<br />
effects (30%) including grade I telangiectasia in fourteen patients<br />
(18%) and induration in eleven patients (14%). Fifty four patients are<br />
showing no or minimal evidence <strong>of</strong> radiation treatment. Reviewing<br />
postimplant quality assurance data, telangiectasia appears to be<br />
preventable if the skin receives less than 85% <strong>of</strong> the prescribed dose.<br />
Finally PBSI is associated with a rate <strong>of</strong> 96.9% good or excellent<br />
cosmetic results at 3 years.<br />
These limited data compare favourably with external beam adjuvant<br />
radiotherapy for early stage breast cancers and other techniques <strong>of</strong><br />
partial breast irradiation. PBSI present the advantage to be realised in<br />
a single outpatient procedure compared to 5 to 6 days for HDR<br />
brachytherapy. Also using a low energy source, the faster dose fall <strong>of</strong>f<br />
enable a dramatic total body dose reduction especially regarding<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 5<br />
heart and lung exposures. As <strong>of</strong> February 20<strong>12</strong> the PBSI technique is<br />
<strong>of</strong>fered in three centres in North America, two additional centres<br />
have obtained IRB approval for the Registry study, and IRB approval is<br />
pending for five centres. In <strong>May</strong> 2011 the FDA approved an<br />
implantation device and a treatment planning system enabling PBSI.<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>12</strong><br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
C. HaieMeder 1<br />
1 Institut Gustave Roussy, Radiation Oncology, Villejuif, France<br />
Carlos A. Perez is an outstanding internationally recognized radiation<br />
oncologist. He was born in Medellin, Colombia and earned his medical<br />
degree at the University <strong>of</strong> Antioquia School <strong>of</strong> Medicine in<br />
1960.Carlos Perez came to the United States at Washington University<br />
School <strong>of</strong> Medicine. He spent three years as a radiation oncology<br />
resident at Mallinckrodt Institute <strong>of</strong> Radiology in SaintLouis Missouri<br />
and a oneyear fellowship in radiotherapy at M.D. Anderson Hospital<br />
and Tumor Institute in Houston Texas. He then returned to<br />
Mallinckrodt as an instructor in radiology.<br />
In 1966 Carlos Perez initiated a program for the specific training <strong>of</strong><br />
radiation therapy technologists.<br />
Carlos Perez was named a pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> radiology in 1972. In 1976 he<br />
became the director <strong>of</strong> the Radiation Oncology Center, at Mallinckrodt<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Radiology. Under his leadership, the Radiation Oncology<br />
Center developed a strong research with significant contributions to<br />
cancer treatment, with the enhancement <strong>of</strong> radiation effects with<br />
concomitant chemotherapy. In 2001 Carlos Perez assumed the first<br />
chairmanship <strong>of</strong> the Center which became a separate academic<br />
department <strong>of</strong> the Washington University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine. Carlos<br />
Perez held this position until2004.<br />
Since 2004 Carlos Perez is a Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Emeritus. He also served as the<br />
President <strong>of</strong> the American Society <strong>of</strong> Therapeutic Radiation in 1982.<br />
He is well known for his major contributions to the clinical<br />
management <strong>of</strong> patients, especially those with gynecologic tumors<br />
and carcinoma <strong>of</strong> the prostate and <strong>of</strong> the breast. His contribution in<br />
the brachytherapy field has been very important, especially in<br />
patients with gynecological cancers. Carlos Perez has been motivated<br />
by understanding the disease as well as the psychological care <strong>of</strong> his<br />
patients. Heis a c<strong>of</strong>ounder <strong>of</strong> the Cancer Information Center (CIC),<br />
the first United States resource facility that provided medical<br />
information, resources and emotional support to cancer patients.<br />
He is the recipient <strong>of</strong> many honors. He was awarded the ESTRO<br />
Honorary Member at the 30 th ESTRO anniversary in London in 2011,<br />
CRILA Gold Medal in 2000, the Gold Medal <strong>of</strong> the American College <strong>of</strong><br />
Radiology in 1997, and the Gold Medal <strong>of</strong> the American Society for<br />
Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology in 1982.<br />
Carlos Perez has published over 300 scientific articles, a lot <strong>of</strong> them<br />
dealing with brachytherapy. He is coeditor <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
comprehensive text on radiation oncology, Principles and Practice <strong>of</strong><br />
Radiation Oncology, now in its sixth edition. In addition, he is co<br />
editor <strong>of</strong> two other outstanding textbooks – Principles and Practice <strong>of</strong><br />
Gynecologic Oncology and Radiation Oncology: Management Decisions.<br />
On behalf <strong>of</strong> GECESTRO, ABS and all brachytherapy societies, it is a<br />
great honor and a great pleasure to award Carlos Perez the GEC<br />
ESTRO Marie Curie medal during the 4 th world brachytherapy meeting<br />
in Barcelona.<br />
13<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY IN CANCER: ART AND SCIENCE ACCOMPLISHMENTS<br />
IN OVER A CENTURY<br />
C. Perez 1<br />
1<br />
Washington University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, St. Louis,<br />
USA<br />
<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> has been used in the treatment <strong>of</strong> patients with a<br />
variety <strong>of</strong> malignant lesions since the turn <strong>of</strong> the XX century, shortly<br />
after the discovery <strong>of</strong> radioactivity by Marie and Pierre Curie and<br />
Antoine Henri Becquerel, recognized by the Nobel Prize in Physics,<br />
bestowed to the three <strong>of</strong> them in 1903. Initially, and for many years<br />
brachytherapy was more <strong>of</strong> an Art: 226Ra needles or sources in<br />
rudimentary applicators (cylinders) 'were inserted in the tumor and<br />
dose prescription was empirical'. Pioneers in Radiation Oncology<br />
designed applicators to achieve better dose distributions. Afterloading<br />
devices with selective shielding, and flexible catheters, initially<br />
loaded manually and later through remote devices provided welcome<br />
radiation safety protection.<br />
Our colleagues in Physics established dosimetry procedures and rules<br />
to more accurately determine radiation doses (Patterson Parker,<br />
Quimby, the Paris dosimetry methodology). 226Ra has been replaced<br />
by other radionuclides with more appealing physical characteristics<br />
(energy, specific radioactivity, half life, etc) and safety for the<br />
patients and the operator, such as 137Cs, 192Ir, 169Yb, 241Am and<br />
others.<br />
Innovative technology has advanced brachytherapy into more<br />
scientific grounds. Sophisticated computational methods and imaging<br />
(ultrasound, CT scanning, etc) enhanced our ability to do more<br />
precise 3D treatment planning and increased our capabilities for<br />
dosimetry verification. Recently MRI and PET scanning have allowed<br />
precise identification <strong>of</strong> target volumes and rapid imaging plus robust<br />
computational techniques have made it possible to carry out real time<br />
imageguided 3D/4D volumetric dose optimization (inappropriately<br />
called 'dose painting', which would apply to a surface).<br />
Radiation Biology investigation has also contributed to advance the<br />
scientific basis <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy. With better understanding <strong>of</strong> the<br />
cellular kinetics and the acute and late effects <strong>of</strong> radiation in normal<br />
tissues it was possible to introduce different dose rate devices into<br />
clinical practice, and in many countries the traditional Low Dose Rate<br />
(LDR) has been progressively replaced by Mid or High Dose Rate (MDR,<br />
HDR) techniques, with substantial reduction in cost <strong>of</strong> treatment and<br />
improved radiation safety for providers and patients. Pulsed Dose Rate<br />
combines the technological advantages <strong>of</strong> HDR with the biological<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> LDR. Recently low keV xray electronic brachytherapy<br />
systems have been introduced, with specific applications, such as<br />
partial breast irradiation.<br />
These modalities , combined with sophisticated treatment planning<br />
algorithms, enhance the flexibility for 3D dose modulation and<br />
optimization, by manipulating source dwelling times and patterns.<br />
Relativedosehomogeneity Index, Dose nonuniformity Ratio and<br />
Conformality Index are tools quite useful to achieve dose<br />
optimization. Modern brachytherapy represents in many respects a<br />
classic mode <strong>of</strong> conformational adaptive radiation therapy. Cloud<br />
computing will facilitate realtime planning and dose optimization,<br />
enhancing the precision in dose delivery. Whereas brachytherapy<br />
continues to be a mainstay in the treatment <strong>of</strong> carcinoma <strong>of</strong> the<br />
uterine cervix and other gynecological tumors, there has been a major<br />
increase in the application <strong>of</strong> permanent seed implants (<strong>12</strong>5I, <strong>10</strong>3Pa)<br />
or HDR in the treatment <strong>of</strong> patients with prostate cancer, with results<br />
equivalent to radical prostatectomy or advanced external beam
S6 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
techniques. On the other hand, a reduction in the use <strong>of</strong><br />
brachytherapy in the treatment <strong>of</strong> patients with cancer <strong>of</strong> the head<br />
and neck has taken place. Breast brachytherapy has been reenacted<br />
with the introduction <strong>of</strong> accelerated partial breast irradiation, the<br />
efficacy and safety <strong>of</strong> which is being tested in several clinical trials.<br />
As in any aspect <strong>of</strong> radiation therapy, quality assurance, safety,<br />
protection and compliance with all regulatory requirements are<br />
critical to the appropriate use <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy.<br />
There is a critical need to emphasize the teaching <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy in<br />
Radiation Oncology Residency programs and to foster prospective<br />
clinical trials to expand its role in the management <strong>of</strong> many patients<br />
with cancer.<br />
<br />
<br />
14<br />
UNDERSTANDING THE PATHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF PROSTATE CANCER<br />
AS A FOUNDATION FOR FOCAL TARGETED BT<br />
D. Bostwick 1<br />
1 Bostwick Laboratories, Research, Glen Allen, USA<br />
: Focal therapy is emerging as a reasonable clinical<br />
compromise treatment for select men with early stage prostate<br />
cancer between definitive therapy (potential overtreatment with<br />
morbidity) and active surveillance (potential undertreatment). This<br />
report examines the pathological features from biopsies that assist in<br />
guiding patient selection for this novel form <strong>of</strong> therapy.<br />
: We undertook a systematic literature review to determine<br />
(1) What are the limitations <strong>of</strong> transrectal and transperineal biopsy<br />
protocols; and (2) How accurately can we define and predict<br />
pathologic selection factors prior to therapy such as final grade,<br />
volume, unifocality, unilaterality, and stage (extent) for the<br />
individual patient?<br />
: Significant variance exists in practice by pathologists and<br />
urologists that results in differences in cancer yield on biopsies.<br />
Transperineal sector or mapping biopsies appears to be a safe<br />
alternative to transrectal biopsies that can more accurately grade<br />
(undergraded in <strong>10</strong>% or more <strong>of</strong> patients with transrectal biopsies),<br />
stage (understaged in 25% or more <strong>of</strong> patients with transrectal biopsy)<br />
and sample (in up to 20% <strong>of</strong> patients with transrectal biopsy, the<br />
index cancer may not be the determinant <strong>of</strong> behavior).<br />
: Not all prostate biopsies are created (or handled)<br />
equally. The quality and method <strong>of</strong> biopsy has a significant impact on<br />
cancer yield as well as pathologic selection factors for focal therapy<br />
such as cancer grade, volume, unifocality, unilaterality, and stage<br />
(extent). Transperineal sector or mapping biopsies appear to be<br />
superior to transrectal biopsies for patient selection for focal<br />
brachytherapy.<br />
15<br />
PRIMARY FOCAL THERAPY OF PROSTATE CANCER: ROLE OF DIAGNOSTIC<br />
IMAGING<br />
F.V. Coakley 1<br />
1<br />
UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center, Radiology and Urology, San<br />
Francisco, USA<br />
: Focal therapy <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer represents an entirely<br />
new paradigm for the management <strong>of</strong> this disease, <strong>of</strong>fering a novel<br />
'middle way' between the nihilistic approach <strong>of</strong> active surveillance and<br />
the morbid approach <strong>of</strong> traditional definitive treatment with radical<br />
prostatectomy or radiation. While conceptually attractive, widespread<br />
adoption <strong>of</strong> focal therapy for prostate cancer will require accurate<br />
identification <strong>of</strong> appropriate patients, credible pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> longterm<br />
efficacy, and precise and effective tumor targeting and ablation.<br />
Imaging is likely to play a central role in many important aspects <strong>of</strong><br />
focal therapy for prostate cancer, including patient selection, tumor<br />
localization, and outcome evaluation.<br />
: Prostate cancer represents<br />
an <strong>org</strong>an and a disease that is difficult to image locally. A a<br />
substantial body <strong>of</strong> evidence has emerged in the last two decades to<br />
indicates that multiparametric MRI, while not a perfect approach,<br />
represents the best available method for local imaging <strong>of</strong> this<br />
condition. Multiparametric MRI refers to standard T2 weighted MR<br />
imaging with the addition <strong>of</strong> some combination <strong>of</strong> diffusion, perfusion,<br />
or spectroscopic MR imaging. Prostate cancer is characterized by low<br />
T2 signal intensity, restricted diffusion, rapid intense enhancement<br />
with washout, and elevated choline to citrate ratio. The optimal<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> these parameters for prostate cancer detection and<br />
characterization is currently unknown and remains under<br />
investigation.<br />
: Multiparametric MRI has been<br />
shown to improve tumor targeting prior to focal therapy. In<br />
particular, a visible lesion and T2weighted imaging associated with at<br />
least 0.54 cm³ <strong>of</strong> spectroscopic abnormality is likely to represent a<br />
dominant (greater than 0.5 cm³) treatable focus <strong>of</strong> disease.<br />
Preliminary data from our institution suggests that a noncapsular<br />
margin <strong>of</strong> 5 mm results in adequate tumor coverage <strong>of</strong> such treatable<br />
foci <strong>of</strong> disease.<br />
: Prostate cancer progression, as evaluated by<br />
serial multiparametric MRI is correlated with PSA progression,<br />
suggesting that this modality could be used to follow disease being<br />
managed by active surveillance or focal therapy. Serial multi<br />
parametric MRI studies have also demonstrated that prostate cancer<br />
usually recurs within the gland at the same location as the dominant<br />
primary tumor. This is a critical observation, since focal therapy only<br />
makes conceptual sense if treatment failure is a manifestation <strong>of</strong><br />
inadequate local control at the site <strong>of</strong> initial dominant disease.<br />
MR guided high intensity focus ultrasound (HIFU) : MR guided HIFU<br />
<strong>of</strong>fers several major advantages as a method <strong>of</strong> tumor ablation,<br />
including precise targeting, accurate thermometry for realtime<br />
monitoring during ablation, and tumor treatment within a stereotactic<br />
environment. Animal and early human studies are encouraging.<br />
However, additional research will be required to validate this<br />
technology before it can enter routine clinical practice.<br />
: Focal therapy has the potential to <strong>of</strong>fer a new<br />
therapeutic option to the management <strong>of</strong> patients with prostate<br />
cancer; imaging with multiparametric MRI is likely to be <strong>of</strong> major<br />
importance in allowing focal therapy to achieve its full promise in the<br />
care <strong>of</strong> these patients.<br />
16<br />
TECHNICAL POSSIBILITIES OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRIMARY FOCAL<br />
THERAPY OF PROSTATE CANCER<br />
G. Kovács 1 , A. Schlaefer 2<br />
1<br />
Universität Lübeck, Interdisciplinary <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> Unit, Lübeck,<br />
Germany<br />
2<br />
Universität Lübeck, Institute <strong>of</strong> Robotics and Cognitive Systems,<br />
Lübeck, Germany<br />
: Considering the potential morbidity <strong>of</strong> radical therapy<br />
(prostatectomy, radiation therapy) there are an increasing number <strong>of</strong><br />
critics who argue that lowrisk prostate cancer is currently being<br />
overtreated. Focal therapy is different from a whole gland treatment:<br />
focal means to not target bladder, sphincter, neurovascular bundles,<br />
and bowel and should spare continence, erectile function, and overall<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> life. Because <strong>of</strong> similarities between prostate cancer and<br />
breast cancer, the procedure may be called as the 'lumpectomy' <strong>of</strong><br />
the man. This growing segment has led to increased interest in less<br />
aggressive strategies and treatment options. Several developments in<br />
urology (vascular targeted photodynamic therapy –VTP, focal<br />
cryoablation, focal electroporation, highintensity focal ultrasound –<br />
HIFU, etc.) <strong>of</strong>fer the tool <strong>of</strong> partial prostate gland treatments and<br />
prospective clinical investigations are already underway.<br />
: The pool <strong>of</strong> different modern radiotherapy<br />
options (intensity modulated radiotherapy IMRT, image guided<br />
radiotherapy IGRT, simultaneous integrated boost SIB, robotic<br />
radiotherapyCK, as well as seed & HDR brachytherapy techniques)<br />
were analyzed in order to prove the potential <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy in<br />
primary partial prostate therapy. These different forms <strong>of</strong> radiation<br />
techniques are compared to each other in terms <strong>of</strong> accuracy <strong>of</strong> target<br />
definition, <strong>of</strong> inter and intrafraction movements, <strong>of</strong> possibility the<br />
target dose painting, as well as <strong>of</strong> low dose volumes, <strong>of</strong> dose on<br />
<strong>org</strong>ans at risk and <strong>of</strong> invasivity. The potential <strong>of</strong> new technical<br />
developments like the use <strong>of</strong> interstitial tissue separators is discussed.<br />
In brachytherapy technology (LDR, HDR or PDR) the potential <strong>of</strong><br />
developing focal imaging needles using optical coherence tomography<br />
and a robotic needle drivers will be highlighted.<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 7<br />
: Modern radiotherapy especially interstitial brachytherapy and<br />
Cyber Knife technology (Figure 1) combined with interstitial tissue<br />
separators between prostate and rectum have the technical potential<br />
for successfully performance <strong>of</strong> partial prostate treatments with<br />
cancer ablative dose levels. However, following the actual discussion<br />
in the urological community regarding definition and diagnosis <strong>of</strong> a<br />
prostate focal lesion which results in difficulties in target definition<br />
for radiotherapy, further clinical work and interdisciplinary consensus<br />
is needed to define standard procedures for partial treatments in<br />
localized prostate cancer.<br />
: Following an interdisciplinary consensus on target<br />
definition for radiotherapy, prospective and controlled multicentric<br />
investigations are needed to define the potential and feasibility <strong>of</strong><br />
radiotherapy in partial prostate treatments.<br />
Figure 1<br />
Potential <strong>of</strong> different radiotherapy technologies in partial prostate<br />
cancer treatment<br />
*better with the use <strong>of</strong> image fusion<br />
17<br />
IS THERE A ROLE FOR FOCAL THERAPY IN PROSTATE CANCER NON<br />
RADIATION TECHNIQUES?<br />
T. de Reijke<br />
Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands<br />
Due to widespread use <strong>of</strong> PSA, urologists face an increasing number <strong>of</strong><br />
patients with small volume, low grade prostatic carcinoma seeking for<br />
the optimal therapeutic approach. Concerns about overdiagnosis <strong>of</strong><br />
prostate cancer and consequently overtreatment <strong>of</strong> clinically<br />
insignificant tumours in combination with the significant morbidity<br />
that traditional therapies carry, have questioned the need for radical<br />
treatments for selected groups <strong>of</strong> patients with lowrisk cancer.<br />
Recently, due to technological advances, focal therapy has been<br />
developed to optimize control while minimizing the adverse <strong>events</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
whole gland therapy and the anxiety associated with delayed<br />
treatment.<br />
The concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>org</strong>an sparing treatment has proven its efficacy for<br />
selected tumors <strong>of</strong> the breast, skin, bladder and kidney. Four<br />
modalities appear to have the most clinical promise for prostate<br />
cancer focal therapy, including high intensity focused ultrasound<br />
(HIFU), cryotherapy, radiation therapy and photodynamic therapy<br />
(PDT). Several approaches can be found including local application <strong>of</strong><br />
therapy to a specific focus, ablation <strong>of</strong> onehalf <strong>of</strong> the prostate<br />
(hemiablation) and ablation <strong>of</strong> nearly the entire prostate (neartotal<br />
ablation).<br />
Cryotherapy has a "freeze rupture" mode <strong>of</strong> action. leading to necrosis<br />
and vascular thrombosis using TRUS or MRI and is the best studied<br />
focal therapy option. HIFU induces a thermal protein denaturation and<br />
coagulative necrosis and uses either TRUS or MRI and only some<br />
feasibility studies have been reported. PDT ha a light activated,<br />
oxygendependent cytotoxic and vasculotoxic mode <strong>of</strong> action using<br />
also TRUS or MRI and only Phase I/II studies have been reported.<br />
The problem with these focal techniques is a lack <strong>of</strong> standardized<br />
followup protocols for patients with focal therapy. As a variable<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> prostate tissue is left untreated in focal therapy, absolute<br />
values <strong>of</strong> PSA will be insufficient for verifying and monitoring<br />
treatment success. The position <strong>of</strong> followup biopsies should be<br />
determined, in addition, MRI/MRS may identify the lesion created by<br />
ablation and may have a potential in followup<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
18<br />
20 EURAMET PROJECT: NEW CALIBRATION STANDARDS IN BRACHY<br />
THERAPY<br />
T. Sander 1 , M.P. Toni 2 , I. AubineauLanièce 3 , J. de Pooter 4 , A.S.<br />
Guerra 2 , T. Schneider 5 , H.J. Selbach 5<br />
1<br />
National Physical Laboratory (NPL), Radiation Dosimetry,<br />
Teddington, United Kingdom<br />
2<br />
Istituto Nazionale di Metrologia delle Radiazioni Ionizzanti (ENEA<br />
INMRI), Radiation Dosimetry, Rome, Italy<br />
3<br />
Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (LNELNHB), Radiation<br />
Dosimetry, GifsurYvette, France<br />
4<br />
Van Swinden Laboratorium (VSL), Radiation Dosimetry, Delft, The<br />
Netherlands<br />
5<br />
PhysikalischTechnische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Radiation Dosimetry,<br />
Braunschweig, Germany<br />
<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> dosimetry for gamma ray sources is currently based on<br />
source calibrations in terms <strong>of</strong> reference air kerma rate (RAKR) or air<br />
kerma strength (AKS). However, the quantity <strong>of</strong> interest is the<br />
absorbed dose rate to water at a distance <strong>of</strong> 1 cm from the source<br />
centre (DRw,1cm), which is currently calculated from RAKR or AKS by<br />
applying the AAPM Task Group 43 formalism [1,2]. As for external<br />
beam radiotherapy dosimetry, there is now growing need for accurate<br />
brachytherapy source dosimetry traceable to national absorbed dose<br />
primary standards.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the aims <strong>of</strong> the project “T2.J06, Increasing cancer treatment<br />
efficacy using 3D brachytherapy” (a joint research project within the<br />
European Association <strong>of</strong> National Metrology Institutes, EURAMET e. V.)<br />
was the development <strong>of</strong> absorbed dose standards which would allow<br />
more direct calibrations <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy sources in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
absorbed dose rate to water at a distance <strong>of</strong> 1 cm, DRw,1cm , compared<br />
to the current air kermabased calibration method, where DRw,1cm is<br />
determined as the product <strong>of</strong> the measured air kerma strength and<br />
the dose rate constant, Λ, resulting in overall standard uncertainties<br />
<strong>of</strong> around 5%.<br />
Of the ten European National Metrology Institutes, which contributed<br />
to the joint research project T2.J06 between July 2008 and June<br />
2011, five developed a total <strong>of</strong> seven independent absorbed dose to<br />
water primary standards for brachytherapy. Three standards, based<br />
on ionometry, were developed for low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy<br />
sources and four standards, based on either water or graphite<br />
calorimetry, were developed for the measurement <strong>of</strong> high dose rate<br />
(HDR) brachytherapy sources. The objective was to measure DRw,1cm<br />
with an overall uncertainty <strong>of</strong> less than 2% (with a coverage factor <strong>of</strong><br />
k = 1, which is equivalent to one standard deviation).<br />
The presentation will describe the design <strong>of</strong> the new absorbed dose<br />
standards and summarise the results <strong>of</strong> DRw,1cm measurements made<br />
with LDR <strong>12</strong>5 I and HDR 192 Ir brachytherapy sources. The same<br />
brachytherapy sources were also measured with existing air kerma<br />
standards in terms <strong>of</strong> reference air kerma rate. Combining both<br />
measurements yielded experimentally determined dose rate constants<br />
for different brachytherapy source types with standard uncertainties<br />
<strong>of</strong> less than 2.6% for LDR sources and standard uncertainties <strong>of</strong> less<br />
than 2% for HDR sources. This is a significant improvement compared<br />
to the 5% standard uncertainty currently achievable with<br />
measurements based on thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). The<br />
measured dose rate constants compared well with published<br />
consensus values [3] within the stated uncertainties.<br />
Both LDR and HDR brachytherapy sources can now be calibrated more<br />
directly in terms <strong>of</strong> absorbed dose rate to water and traceable to<br />
primary standards. Improvements in the accuracy <strong>of</strong> absorbed dose<br />
rate measurements and treatment delivery result in higher survival<br />
rates and better quality <strong>of</strong> life for cancer patients.<br />
References<br />
[1] Nath R, Anderson L L, Luxton G, Weaver K A, Williamson J F and<br />
Meigooni A S, Dosimetry <strong>of</strong> interstitial brachytherapy sources:
S8 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
Recommendations <strong>of</strong> the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task<br />
Group No. 43. Med. Phys. 22 (1995), 209234<br />
[2] Rivard M J, Coursey B M, DeWerd L A, Hanson W F, Saiful Huq M,<br />
Ibbott G S, Mitch M G, Nath R and Williamson J F, Update <strong>of</strong> AAPM<br />
Task Group No. 43 Report: A revised AAPM protocol for brachytherapy<br />
dose calculations, Med. Phys. 31 (2004), 633674<br />
[3] ESTRO European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology,<br />
http://www.estro.<strong>org</strong>/estroactivities/Pages/TG43BTDOSMETRICPARA<br />
METERS.aspx (accessed 23 January 20<strong>12</strong>)<br />
19<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY CALIBRATION STANDARDS IN THE USA<br />
L. De Werd 1<br />
1 University <strong>of</strong> Winsconsin, <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Madison, USA<br />
<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> sources in the USA are characterized by the dosimetric<br />
quantity known as the air kerma strength. The division <strong>of</strong> the<br />
standards is along the line <strong>of</strong> energy and dose rate. For example, Low<br />
Dose Rate (LDR) sources at low energy are calibrated using the Wide<br />
Angle Free Air Chamber (WAFAC). A description <strong>of</strong> the primary<br />
standard and the transfer to the Accredited Dosimetry Calibration<br />
Laboratories (ADCL) will be described. This standard is then<br />
transferred to the clinical physicist. A summary <strong>of</strong> this process will be<br />
given. The High Dose Rate (HDR) highenergy sources are calibrated<br />
with the “7 distance technique.” A comparison <strong>of</strong> the various sources<br />
on the market will be described and their comparison will be given.<br />
The air kerma strength for each <strong>of</strong> the sources is within 1% <strong>of</strong> each<br />
other. This standard is also transferred to the clinic via a well<br />
ionization chamber. Finally, the calibration standard related to a HDR<br />
low energy xray source will be described. Each <strong>of</strong> these sources is<br />
traceable to a primary standard with data obtained for the last 20<br />
years.<br />
20<br />
RAMIFICATIONS OF DOSERATE TO WATER CALIBRATIONS ON CLINICAL<br />
DOSIMETRY FOR PHOTONEMITTING BRACHYTHERAPY SOURCES<br />
M.J. Rivard 1 , F.A. Siebert 2 , J.L.M. Venselaar 3 , L.A. DeWerd 4<br />
1<br />
Tufts University, Radiation Oncology, Boston, USA<br />
2<br />
Universitatsklinikum SchleswigHolstein, Clinic <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy,<br />
Kiel, Germany<br />
3<br />
Instituut Verbeeten, Medical Physics, Tilburg, The Netherlands<br />
4<br />
University Wisconsin, Medical Physics, Madison, USA<br />
For several decades, the radiotherapy community has utilized<br />
reference airkerma rate (RAKR) as the only traceable quantity for<br />
brachytherapy (BT) source strength U. This quantity is used in place <strong>of</strong><br />
apparent activity, milligram radium equivalent, and other antiquated<br />
quantities. A new quantity, doserate to water at 1 cm perpendicular<br />
to the source long axis, is under consideration in the European<br />
metrology laboratories. This presentation will examine the current<br />
practice <strong>of</strong> clinical dosimetry for photonemitting BT sources using<br />
source strength calibrations based on RAKR, with community impact<br />
and quantitative comparisons <strong>of</strong> source strength calibrations based on<br />
doserate to water at 1 cm.<br />
The BT source calibration chain is complex and has evolved to include<br />
several constituents [DeWerd et al. 2004]. It is initiated by BT source<br />
manufacturers producing a new source type. The radiological<br />
properties <strong>of</strong> this source are determined by academic researcher(s)<br />
who typically characterize the dose distribution using measurements<br />
and Monte Carlo (MC) methods <strong>of</strong> radiation transport simulations. An<br />
important part <strong>of</strong> this characterization is to determine the doserate<br />
constant Λ, which is the ratio <strong>of</strong> the doserate to water at 1 cm from<br />
the source center on the transverse plane <strong>of</strong> the source to the source<br />
strength as in Λ = D(r,θ)/Kr. The source strength is to be measured at<br />
a primary standards dosimetry laboratory (PSDL) having a calibration<br />
standard for that radionuclide. PSDL measurement <strong>of</strong> the source<br />
strength permits calibration <strong>of</strong> reentrant welltype ionization<br />
chambers at secondary standards dosimetry labs (SSDLs) and for the<br />
BT source manufacturer.<br />
In BT practice within the United States, the clinical medical physicist<br />
has their reentrant welltype ionization chamber calibrated by an<br />
SSDL (Accredited Dosimetry Calibration Lab) for PSDL (National<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Standards and Technology) traceability. In Europe, SSDLs<br />
are not prevalent and physicists calibrate their own dosimetry<br />
equipment against a PSDLtraceable chamber for that particular<br />
source model. When ordering BT sources for a patient, the physicist<br />
measures the source strength for intercomparison with the source<br />
strength on the certificate provided by the manufacturer [Butler et al.<br />
2008]. The physicistmeasured source strength may then be entered<br />
into the BT treatment planning system (TPS), along with the<br />
consensus Λ value for that particular source model, for clinical dose<br />
calculations. The product <strong>of</strong> Λ and RAKR yields the doserate to water<br />
at 1 cm from the source center on the transverse plane. Additional BT<br />
dosimetry parameters are used for derivation <strong>of</strong> dose distributions<br />
following the AAPM TG43 dose calculation formalism [Rivard et al.<br />
2004]. This process is well established.<br />
The joint AAPM/GECESTRO TG138 report determined uncertainties<br />
for this dose calculation process, starting with BT source calibrations<br />
[DeWerd et al. 2011]. For lowenergy photonemitting sources such as<br />
<strong>12</strong>5 I, clinical procedures usually utilize many sources in which<br />
manufacturerprovided source strengths are determined in 7% wide<br />
groupings from a nominal value and the physicistmeasured source<br />
strengths are determined from a subset <strong>of</strong> the total batch.<br />
Consequently, the uncertainty attributed to source strengths for low<br />
energy sources is larger than that initially measured at the PSDL. For<br />
highenergy photonemitting sources such as HDR 192 Ir, clinical<br />
procedures utilize a single source in which the manufacturer and<br />
physicist calibration uncertainties are smaller than for lowenergy<br />
seeds.<br />
Development <strong>of</strong> a source strength calibration standard based on dose<br />
rate to water at 1 cm is a new concept, and aims to remove the step<br />
associated with Λ derivation so that physicists would calibrate source<br />
strength in terms <strong>of</strong> doserate to water at 1 cm instead <strong>of</strong> RAKR<br />
[Rivard et al. 2009]. Source strength calibration uncertainties<br />
associated with each step in the current (RAKR) and proposed (dose<br />
rate to water) methods are examined. While it is not apparent that<br />
the new/proposed calibration method is superior to the established<br />
method based on RAKR, an action plan and resources required to<br />
guide the BT community to the proposed new calibration standard are<br />
discussed.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
21<br />
CLINICAL RESULTS<br />
R. Pötter 1<br />
1<br />
Medical University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Vienna,<br />
Austria<br />
: Imageguided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) is<br />
increasingly implemented as new treatment option for cervix cancer<br />
applying the GYN GEC ESTRO recommendations. This approach allows<br />
for balancing target coverage/dose and dose volume constraints for<br />
OARs. With 2D conventional treatment planning (fixed point (A)<br />
prescription) only some adaptation <strong>of</strong> OAR dose points is possible.<br />
Dosimetric studies comparing 2D and 3D dose planning have provided<br />
evidence for better OAR sparing using 3D. Therefore it is expected<br />
that IGABT will result in decrease <strong>of</strong> BT related morbidity.<br />
Clinical evidence for this expectation is provided by retrospective<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> mono and multicentre experience (RetroEMBRACE) and<br />
some upcoming prospective multicentre comparative and<br />
observational studies (STIC/EMBRACE). The outcome data indicate a<br />
decrease <strong>of</strong> morbidity, however, they are not straightforward. The<br />
value <strong>of</strong> historical comparisons with 2D data is also limited due to<br />
retrospective (multicentre) data collection for morbidity assessment<br />
with even different scoring systems being applied.<br />
: There are single<br />
institution reports after IGABT on late morbidity showing rectal<br />
morbidity (mainly rectal bleeding) ranging between <strong>12</strong>42%. In a small<br />
selected patient population (Ge<strong>org</strong> 2009), endoscopic changes and<br />
clinical symptoms were observed after HDR BT in 77% (27/35) and in<br />
37% (13/35). The probability from dose effect analysis for Vienna<br />
rectoscopy score (VRS) changes ≥3 was <strong>10</strong>%/50% at 59/68 Gy (all doses<br />
in EQD2) for rectal D2ccm and <strong>10</strong>%/50% for rectal side effects G24 at<br />
65/76 Gy D2ccm. This number (selected patient group) contrasts with<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 9<br />
results from a larger patient population (Ge<strong>org</strong> 20<strong>10</strong>, 2011). Based on<br />
dose effect analysis there is <strong>10</strong>% probability for a D2ccm <strong>of</strong> 73 Gy.(G14)<br />
and 78 Gy (G24), resp. Clinical rectal side effects were actuarial <strong>12</strong>%<br />
(11/141) for any grade (8/141 for G24) for a mean rectal D2ccm <strong>of</strong> 65<br />
Gy (med foll.up 51 mths). Overall, G3/G4 actuarial rates were 4% for<br />
bladder, 2% for rectum, and 2% for sigmoid.<br />
Rectoscopic changes (VRS score ≥ 2) were reported with a 50%<br />
incidence after HDR BT for a D2ccm <strong>of</strong> 75 Gy (Koom 2007). Clinical<br />
rectal bleeding from the same authors (mean rectal D2ccm 70.4 Gy)<br />
showed actuarial 42% for any grade <strong>of</strong> rectal bleeding (RTOG/EORTC)<br />
with only 2% severe bleeding (G34) after 3D BT compared to 13%<br />
after 2D BT (Kang 20<strong>10</strong>).<br />
The number <strong>of</strong> adverse <strong>events</strong> <strong>of</strong> preop 3DLDR BT without EBRT was<br />
20 for grade <strong>12</strong> and 0 for grade 34 in 13/39 patients with a follow up<br />
<strong>of</strong> 4.4 years (HaieMeder 2009). Late overall toxicity <strong>of</strong> MRI based 3D<br />
PDR BT plus EBRT was 21/45 G<strong>12</strong>, 1/45 G3 (0 G4) with follow up <strong>of</strong> 26<br />
mths after .mean D2ccm <strong>of</strong> 61 Gy and 72 Gy for rectum and bladder,<br />
resp (Chargari 2009).<br />
Preliminary data from retroEMBRACE from 417 patients shows 96 GU,<br />
143 GI and 161 vagina late adverse <strong>events</strong> at 3 years after median<br />
D2ccm <strong>of</strong> 73 Gy for bladder and 63 Gy for rectum and sigmoid (Fokdal<br />
2011).<br />
The first<br />
prospective multicenter study was performed in France (STIC) as non<br />
randomised trial comparing 2D vs. 3D PDR BT (mainly CT based). The<br />
cumulative actuarial incidence <strong>of</strong> overall G3G4 morbidity at 2 years<br />
(GI, GU, Gyn) was 2.6% vs. 22.7% in the 3D vs. 2D arm in 117 vs. 118<br />
patients (p=0.002) with definitive treatment (EBRT+IGABT) delivering<br />
mean 73 Gy EQD2 to the HR CTV (3D arm) and mean D2ccm <strong>of</strong> 68 Gy to<br />
rectum and 64 Gy to bladder (CharraBrunaud 20<strong>12</strong>).<br />
EMBRACE, a prospective multicentre observational study, investigates<br />
MRI based IGABT. The mean follow up <strong>of</strong> 1 year in overall 600 patients<br />
accrued by 3/20<strong>12</strong> does not allow any valid estimates <strong>of</strong> late toxicity.<br />
: IGABT for definitive treatment in locally advanced<br />
cervical cancer as practiced in single and multicentre settings results<br />
in low rates <strong>of</strong> grade 3 and 4 and moderate rates <strong>of</strong> G1 and G2 toxicity<br />
after limited follow up. There is some (limited) evidence that these<br />
rates seem to be lower than after traditional 2D BT confirming the<br />
dosimetric evidence. More mature data from prospective clinical trials<br />
is needed to support these first observations.<br />
22<br />
DVH PARAMETER ANALYSIS<br />
K. Tanderup 1<br />
1 Aarhus University Hospital, Medical Physics, Aarhus C, Denmark<br />
With the advent <strong>of</strong> image guided adaptive brachytherapy (BT), it has<br />
become possible to define a common language to communicate<br />
information in a valid, reliable and reproducible way about dose and<br />
volumes, and thus to facilitate a better understanding dose volume<br />
relations and dose volume effects. In 2006 GEC ESTRO<br />
recommendations for reporting and recording <strong>of</strong> dose parameters<br />
were published for BT in cervical cancer (Pötter et al 2006). A new<br />
ICRU report is currently in progress on “Dose and volume reporting in<br />
brachytherapy in cervical cancer”, and the presentation will outline<br />
the recommendations with regard to DVH parameter reporting.<br />
Due to the rapid dose fall<strong>of</strong>f near the BT sources there is a large dose<br />
inhomogeneity in OARs. The <strong>org</strong>an walls adjacent to the applicator<br />
(sources), like the anterior rectal and sigmoid (bowel) walls, inferior<br />
and mid–posterior bladder wall, or the vaginal wall adjacent to the<br />
cervix and vaginal applicator, are irradiated with doses <strong>of</strong> 50%<strong>10</strong>0+%<br />
<strong>of</strong> prescribed BT dose in a typical scenario for definitive cervix cancer<br />
radiotherapy. On the contrary, the more distant <strong>org</strong>an, like the<br />
posterior rectosigmoid (bowel) walls, the superior–anterior bladder<br />
wall, or the inferior vagina, are irradiated by BT with much lower<br />
doses (
S<strong>10</strong> <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
<br />
OC24<br />
TENYEAR OUTCOMES FOR PATIENTS WITH GLEASON 8<strong>10</strong> TREATED<br />
WITH HIGH DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY BOOST<br />
A. Martinez 1 , C. Shah 2 , N. Mohammed 2 , J. Demanes 3 , R. Martinez<br />
Monge 4 , H. Ye 2 , R. Galalae 5<br />
1<br />
Michigan Healthcare Pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, Radiation Oncology, Farmington<br />
Hills, USA<br />
2<br />
Beaumont Health System, Radiation Oncology, Royal Oak, USA<br />
4<br />
Universidad de Navarra, Radiation Oncology, Pamplona, Spain<br />
5<br />
Kiel University, Radiation Oncology, Kiel, Germany<br />
: To report long term multiinstitutional outcomes<br />
for Gleason 8–<strong>10</strong> prostate cancer patients treated with external beam<br />
radiotherapy (EBRT) and high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost.<br />
Between 1987 and 2002, 483 patients with<br />
Gleason 8<strong>10</strong> disease were treated for localized prostate cancer at<br />
William Beaumont Hospital (WBH), the California Endocurietherapy<br />
Center (CET), Kiel University, and the Universidad de Navarra on four<br />
prospective HDR boost trials. Conformal EBRT was delivered to the<br />
pelvis (dose range 36 Gy–50.4 Gy) along with HDR boost for a<br />
combined biologic equivalent dose (BED) <strong>of</strong> 215–366 Gy (α/β=1.2).<br />
Conformal intensity modulated HDRBT was planned and treatment<br />
was delivered using online transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images at<br />
WBH. At CET, Kiel University, and Navarra University, HDRBT<br />
treatment planning was CT based. Biochemical control (BC) was<br />
defined according to the Phoenix criteria (freedom from PSA rise <strong>of</strong><br />
2ng/ml above nadir).<br />
: Mean patient age was 68.4 years with mean initial PSA (iPSA)<br />
<strong>of</strong> 18.8 ng/ml. Mean followup was 6.1 years. <strong>10</strong>year outcomes were:<br />
biochemical control (BC) 53.5%, distant metastases (DM) 22.1%,<br />
clinical failure (CF) 25.6%, cause specific survival (CSS) 82.6% and<br />
overall survival (OS) 62.7%. Hormones were given in 69.9% <strong>of</strong> patients<br />
but did not significantly improve BC, DM, CSS, or OS. <strong>10</strong>year<br />
outcomes stratified by iPSA (40 ng/ml) were improved for all<br />
outcomes with lower iPSA including BC (57.4% v. <strong>10</strong>.3%, p
S<strong>12</strong> <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
204 patients were identified as having a high risk anatomic prostate<br />
gland (50cc, or history <strong>of</strong> prior TURP). 46 patients were<br />
identified as having ultrasound prostate volume <strong>of</strong> ≤20 cc at the time<br />
<strong>of</strong> the implant (median, 17.8cc, range 6.7cc20cc; lower quartile,<br />
6.7cc15.5cc). <strong>12</strong>1 patients were identified as having ultrasound<br />
prostate volume <strong>of</strong> ≥50 cc at the time <strong>of</strong> the implant (median, 61cc,<br />
range 50cc116cc; upper quartile 74cc116cc). 37 patients were<br />
identified as having a history <strong>of</strong> a prior TURP. In the standard risk<br />
group there were 443 patients, the median ultrasound prostate<br />
volume was 32.8cc (range, 20.249.8).<br />
Neoadjuvant hormone therapy was not routinely recommended unless<br />
the initial ultrasound prostate volume suggested significant pubic arch<br />
interference or the patient's Gleason score and or prostate specific<br />
antigen placed the patient in either intermediate or high risk<br />
categories. Patients received HDR brachytherapy as a boost either<br />
before or after 4500 cGy <strong>of</strong> external beam radiotherapy (3D conformal<br />
until 2006 and IMRT thereafter). Boost brachytherapy doses ranged<br />
from 1600 1900 cGy, given in 23 fractions, with the most common<br />
fractionation schedule being 950 cGy in two daily fractions given on<br />
the same day as the implant with a minimum 6 hours interval between<br />
fractions.<br />
: The dosimetric findings are as follows:<br />
Patient<br />
Group<br />
D90 V<strong>10</strong>0 V150 D5 rectum D5 urethra<br />
50cc Median<strong>10</strong>6.2% 95.1% 18.2% 55.4% <strong>10</strong>9.7%<br />
N=<strong>12</strong>1 Range 95117% 9099% 3.335% 3771% <strong>10</strong>3<strong>12</strong>1%<br />
TURP Median <strong>10</strong>7.8% 94.7% 19.3% 54.2% <strong>10</strong>7.8%<br />
N=37 Range <strong>10</strong>2.5117% 87.9<strong>10</strong>0% 5.332% 3474% <strong>10</strong>1<strong>12</strong>1%<br />
Standard Median <strong>10</strong>7.5% 95.5% 18% 51% 1<strong>10</strong>%<br />
N=443 Range 94117% 83<strong>10</strong>0% 336.5% 2473% 97<strong>12</strong>2%<br />
*High risk groups in bold<br />
With a median <strong>of</strong> 5.1 years, there have been nine grade II urethral<br />
strictures (CTCAE v.3) for the entire cohort. Four <strong>of</strong> these occurred in<br />
the anatomic high risk group and five occurred in the standard risk<br />
group. There was one grade II incontinence in the high risk group and<br />
one grade I incontinence in the standard risk group. There was only<br />
one grade II or higher toxicities found in the high risk group as well as<br />
only a single grade II gastrointestinal toxicity in the standard group.<br />
: In our experience, cases traditional deemed as<br />
unsuitable for prostate brachytherapy (50cc, prior TURP) are<br />
well managed with HDR brachytherapy with the expectation <strong>of</strong><br />
excellent dosimetric coverage acceptable long term toxicities.<br />
OC29<br />
SALVAGE HDR BRACHYTHERAPY FOR RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER<br />
AFTER PRIOR DEFINITIVE RADIOTHERAPY: FIVE YEAR OUTCOMES<br />
C.P. Chen 1 , V. Weinberg 2 , K. Shinohara 3 , M. Nash 1 , A. Gottschalk 1 , M.<br />
Roach III 1 , I. Hsu 1<br />
1<br />
UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, San<br />
Francisco, USA<br />
2<br />
Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Biostatistics Core,<br />
Biostatistics, San Francisco, USA<br />
3<br />
University <strong>of</strong> California San Francisco, Urology, San Francisco, USA<br />
: Evaluate the efficacy and toxicity <strong>of</strong> salvage high<br />
dose rate brachytherapy (HDRB) for locally recurrent prostate cancer<br />
after definitive radiotherapy (RT).<br />
: From November 1998 to June 2009, we<br />
retrospectively analyzed 52 consecutively accrued patients undergoing<br />
salvage HDRB for locally recurrent prostate cancer after prior<br />
definitive RT. After pathologic confirmation <strong>of</strong> locally recurrent<br />
disease, all patients received 36 Gy in 6 fractions. Twentyfour<br />
patients received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy prior to salvage<br />
whereas no patients received adjuvant hormonal therapy.<br />
Determination <strong>of</strong> biochemical failure (bF) after salvage HDRB was<br />
based on the Phoenix definition. The 5 year probability estimates <strong>of</strong><br />
overall survival (OS) and bF were calculated using KaplanMeier<br />
method. Univariate analyses were performed using the log rank test<br />
for categorical variables and Cox’s proportional hazards model for<br />
continuous variables to identify predictors <strong>of</strong> bF. Based on the<br />
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 4),<br />
acute (less than 3 months postsalvage) and late (more than 3 months)<br />
genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were<br />
documented.<br />
: Median followup after salvage HDRB was 59.6 months<br />
(range, 5.9 – 154.7 months). The 5year KaplanMeier estimate <strong>of</strong> OS<br />
was 92% (95% confidence interval (CI) 8097%) without median survival<br />
yet reached. Fiveyear biochemical control after salvage was 51% (95%<br />
CI 3466%). Median PSA nadir postsalvage was 0.1 (range 0 – 7.2) for<br />
all patients. However, patients who were bNED had median PSA nadir<br />
<strong>of</strong> 0.025 (range 0 – 0.6) whereas those who recurred after salvage had<br />
a median nadir (PSA) <strong>of</strong> 0.49 (range 0 – 7.2). On univariate analysis,<br />
disease free interval after initial definitive radiotherapy (p=0.07),<br />
interval from 1 st recurrence to salvage HDRB (p=0.09), and preHDRB<br />
PSA (p=0.07) were <strong>of</strong> borderline significance in predicting bF after<br />
salvage HDRB.<br />
Fortysix patients are alive (27 NED) and 6 patients have died (2 NED).<br />
Overall, after salvage HDRB, 22 patients developed disease<br />
recurrence with 16 having biochemical failure without pathologic or<br />
radiographic confirmation <strong>of</strong> recurrence, 3 with pathologic local<br />
recurrence, 2 with regional recurrence, and one with distant<br />
metastasis.<br />
Overall there were no Grade 4 or 5 toxicities and very few Grade 3<br />
acute or late symptoms. Acute and late grade 3 GU toxicities were<br />
observed in only 2% and 2%, respectively. There was minimal GI<br />
toxicity with no Grade 2 or higher acute <strong>events</strong> and only 4% grade 2<br />
late <strong>events</strong>.<br />
: We present the largest series <strong>of</strong> patients treated with<br />
salvage HDR brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after<br />
prior definitive RT. Prostate HDR brachytherapy is an effective<br />
salvage modality with few toxicities. We provide potential predictors<br />
<strong>of</strong> biochemical control for prostate salvage HDR brachytherapy.<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 13<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
OC30<br />
RESULTS OF I<strong>12</strong>5 STRANDS + EBRT +ADT IN LOCALIZED PROSTATE<br />
CANCER COMPARED TO KATTAN (2002) NOMOGRAM PREDICTIONS<br />
J. Zimmermann 1 , P. Zimmermann 2 , C. Moustakis 3<br />
1<br />
Praxiszentrum Alstertal, and Interdisziplinäres Prostatazentrum<br />
Kath. Marienkrankenhaus, Hamburg, Germany<br />
2<br />
Praxiszentrum Alstertal, Hamburg, Germany<br />
3<br />
Institut für Medizinische Physik, Klinik für Strahlentherapie,<br />
Münster, Germany<br />
: To evaluate the 5year biochemical progression<br />
free survival after prostate brachytherapy with I<strong>12</strong>5 strands +EBRT+<br />
ADT and compare the results to pretherapeutic prediction tools.<br />
Furtheron evaluation <strong>of</strong> TURP and clinical proctitis after treatment.<br />
: Between 01/2004 and <strong>12</strong>/2007, n=604<br />
consecutive patients with localized prostate carcinoma (N0M0) were<br />
treated in curative intention with iodine <strong>12</strong>5 strands (145 Gy<br />
Mono/<strong>10</strong>8 Gy with EBRT). N=71 patients had EBRT 45 Gy, n=153 ADT.<br />
Intraop preplanning in 2004 and 2005, intraop online planning in 2006<br />
and 2007. N=7 were lost to follow up, n=597 evaluable. N=313 had low<br />
risk (LR), n=204 intermediate risk (IR) and n=80 high risk (HR) disease<br />
according to the d´Amico classification. Mean follow up was 60,01<br />
months (392). The endpoint was freedom from biochemical<br />
progression (FFBP) according to the Phoenix criteria. The analysis<br />
evaluates this endpoint for risk grouping, initial PSA level, Gleason<br />
score, age, prior TURP, mean seed activity, additional ADT and more.<br />
Furtheron we looked at side effects (TURP, proctitis). The results are<br />
compared to the patient related averaged 5yearpredictions from the<br />
Kattan/MSKCC nomogram (2002) in order a. to compare the results to<br />
internationally established outcome predictions for RPX, EBRT and<br />
Brachy +EBRT (BE), b. to normalize the subgroup results and c.<br />
therefore to identify potential good or weak spots for quality<br />
assurance.<br />
: Overall FFBP was 93.3%. FFBP was 96.49% in LR group<br />
(Kattan: RPE 90%/EBRT88%/BE 89%), 90,2% in IR (Kattan: RPE<br />
75%/EBRT 77%/BE 80%) and 88,88 % in HR group (Kattan: RPE<br />
62%/EBRT 56 %/BE 81%). PSA < <strong>10</strong> ng/ml showed a FFBP <strong>of</strong> 94.35%,<br />
PSA <strong>10</strong> 20 ng/ml <strong>of</strong> 95,24 (!) %. FFBP in Gleason =8 87.5%. After TURP for<br />
LR patients, FFBP was 86.7% (Kattan: RPE 90%/EBRT 90%/BE 89%) ,<br />
after TURP for IR patients 88.89 % (Kattan: RPE 77%/EBRT 79%/BE<br />
84%) and after TURP for HR patients 75% (Kattan: RPE 62%/EBRT<br />
56%/BE 83%) . FFBP in patients < 65 years was 93.79%, 6574 years<br />
92.33% and in patients > 75 years 97.06 %. Patients without ADT had<br />
FFBP <strong>of</strong> 94.37% (Kattan: RPE 84%/EBRT82%/BE 86%), patients with ADT<br />
90.2% (Kattan: RPE 75%/EBRT74%/BE 80%).<br />
Activity per seed 0.7 mCi <strong>of</strong> 95.24%.<br />
After brachytherapy alone, TURP rate was 3,9%, rate <strong>of</strong> proctitis<br />
I/II/III was 2.1%. After brachytherapy and EBRT, TURP rate was 6.5%<br />
and proctitis I/II/III rate 8.7 %.<br />
:<br />
1. FFBP in all risk groups after a mean follow up <strong>of</strong> 60 months is<br />
excellent and compared to the patient related predictions from 2002<br />
Kattan/MSKCC nomograms signifantly better than predictions for RPX<br />
and EBRT as well as for Brachy+EBRT.<br />
2. It is possible to normalize the patients outcome in subgroups with<br />
the individual progression risks, which is especially interesting for<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> subgroups with special aspects or individual risks.<br />
3. Thus, comparing results with the subgroup related averaged<br />
nomogram predictions might be a promising tool for intra/and<br />
interinstitutional quality assurance or clinical trials.<br />
OC31<br />
COMPARISON OF DISTANT METASTASES FOR PROSTATE CANCER<br />
PATIENTS TREATED WITH PROSTATECTOMY, BRACHYTHERAPY OR IMRT<br />
M. Zelefsky 1 , J. Eastham 2 , P. Scardino 2 , X. Pei 1 , M. Kollmeier 1 , B.<br />
Cox 1 , Y. Yamada 1<br />
1<br />
Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, New<br />
York, USA<br />
2<br />
Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Urology, New York, USA<br />
: To compare the longterm distant metastases<br />
free survival outcomes (DMFS) for patients with clinically localized<br />
prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy (RP),<br />
brachytherapy (BRT) or intensity modulated external beam<br />
radiotherapy (IMRT).<br />
: Between 1993 and 2009, 5316 patients with<br />
clinical stages T1cT2c were treated with RP (n=2870), BRT (n=1344)<br />
or IMRT (n=1<strong>10</strong>2). In the BRT cohort, 9<strong>10</strong> patients were treated with<br />
monotherapy, and 434 patients with higherrisk disease were treated<br />
with a combined modality approach which utilized supplemental IMRT<br />
to a dose <strong>of</strong> 4550.4 Gy. Patients treated with IMRT alone were<br />
treated to > 81 Gy. Patients were classified according to the NCCN<br />
risk group classification. The median follow up was 4.8 years (range:<br />
217 years).<br />
: The 7year DMFS for the RP, BRT and IMRT groups were 1.5%,<br />
0.8% and 3.6 % (p< 0.001). In the low risk group no significant<br />
differences were observed between the treatment cohorts ; the 7<br />
year DMFS rates were 0.7%, 0% and 1.2% for RP, BRT and IMRT groups<br />
(overall p value=1.0). For the intermediate risk cohort, IMRT patients<br />
experienced a higher incidence <strong>of</strong> distant metastases compared to the<br />
other cohorts; the 7year DMFS rates were 2.5%, 2.5% and 4.9% for RP,<br />
BRT and IMRT groups (p= 0.02). Cox regression analysis revealed the<br />
following variables to be associated with an inferior DMFS: higher<br />
clinical stage (p=0.004), biopsy Gleason score 7 vs 6 (p
S14 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
(p=0.08). The bladder maximum dose and D2 cc were not significantly<br />
different between arms.<br />
: HDR achieves significantly higher intraprostatic doses to<br />
the prostate while significantly decreasing the maximum rectal dose<br />
with our best achievable SBRT treatment planning. This was shown<br />
with patients treated with HDR monotherapy and using the plans and<br />
dosimetry to create a best achievable SBRT plan. This should be the<br />
standard to compare these modalities rather than the reverse, and is<br />
a strength to our study. Whether SBRT will provide benefit over<br />
brachytherapy clinically has yet to be demonstrated, and future<br />
studies comparing the two modalities will help gain insight into the<br />
role <strong>of</strong> each treatment.<br />
OC33<br />
COMPARATIVE COSTEFFECTIVENESS OF SALVAGE BRACHYTHERAPY VS.<br />
HORMONAL TREATMENT OF RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER<br />
L. Steuten 1 , M. Piena 1 , M. Peters 2 , M. van Vulpen 2<br />
1<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Twente, Health Technology and Services Research,<br />
Enschede, The Netherlands<br />
2<br />
University Medical Centre Utrecht, Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The<br />
Netherlands<br />
: To estimate the incremental cost per Quality<br />
Adjusted Life Year (QALY) <strong>of</strong> focal and total salvage using<br />
brachytherapy compared to each other and to hormonal treatment in<br />
patient with recurrent prostate cancer.<br />
: A decision analytic model comparing costs<br />
and QALYs associated with focal salvage, total salvage and hormonal<br />
therapy was developed. The analysis considered a 1 year time horizon<br />
and adopted a hospital perspective on costs. Probabilities for severe<br />
urogenital, severe gastrointestinal, nonsevere toxicity and their<br />
impact on healthrelated quality <strong>of</strong> life (SF36) were derived from a<br />
clinical study <strong>of</strong> the University Medical Centre Utrecht (UMCU) and<br />
complemented with literature data where required. Cost data were<br />
gathered from the UMCU and complemented with available national<br />
cost data. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis, using <strong>10</strong>000 Monte Carlo<br />
simulations, was performed to quantify the joint decision uncertainty<br />
at the recommended willingness to pay threshold <strong>of</strong> €80k / QALY.<br />
: Focal and total salvage with brachytherapy both have higher<br />
expected effectiveness than hormonal treatment but also higher costs<br />
(see table). Generating one additional QALY with focal salvage<br />
brachytherapy costs €93299 compared to hormonal therapy. However,<br />
the model indicates large decision uncertainty between these two<br />
treatments with circa 40% probability for focal salvage brachytherapy<br />
to be costeffective. Focal salvage dominates total salvage as it has<br />
higher expected effectiveness and lower expected costs. Decision<br />
uncertainty between these two alternatives is small, with circa 80%<br />
probability for focal salvage to be costeffective compared to total<br />
salvage. In both comparisons, the main drivers <strong>of</strong> decision uncertainty<br />
are the probabilities for severe toxicity and impact on healthrelated<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> life.<br />
Therapy Cost Incremental<br />
cost<br />
QALYs Incremental<br />
QALYs<br />
Hormonal €1840 0.83 <br />
Focal<br />
salvage<br />
brachyth.<br />
Total<br />
salvage<br />
brachyth.<br />
€6683 + € 4843 (vs.<br />
hormonal)<br />
€<strong>10</strong>945 + € 4263 (vs.<br />
focal)<br />
Incremental<br />
cost / QALY<br />
0.88 +0.05 (vs. €93299<br />
hormonal)<br />
0.87 0.01 (vs.<br />
focal)<br />
Dominated by<br />
focal salvage<br />
: Focal salvage using brachytherapy is likely to dominate<br />
total salvage as it is both more effective and less costly. Based on<br />
current data, hormonal treatment <strong>of</strong> recurrent prostate cancer seems<br />
more costeffective than focal salvage with brachytherapy.<br />
Substantial decision uncertainty exists between focal salvage and<br />
hormonal treatment, driven by uncertain probabilities for urogenital<br />
and gastrointestinal toxicity and impact on healthrelated quality <strong>of</strong><br />
life. Therefore, further clinical trials comparing toxicity patterns and<br />
healthrelated quality <strong>of</strong> life following focal salvage brachytherapy or<br />
hormonal treatment among patients with recurrent prostate cancer<br />
are recommended as most valuable to inform future decisionmaking.<br />
OC34<br />
A NOVEL METHOD TO QUANTIFY PROSTATE SEED IMPLANT PLAN<br />
QUALITY BY PERFORMING INDIVIDUAL SEED DISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS<br />
Y. Le 1 , R. Alexander 2 , E. Armour 1 , D. Song 1<br />
1<br />
Johns Hopkins University, Radiation Oncology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />
2<br />
Southern University, Physics, Baton Rouge LA, USA<br />
: We report on a novel method to quantify the<br />
treatment plan quality for prostate seed implant by performing<br />
Individual Seed Displacement Analysis (ISDA). The clinical relevance <strong>of</strong><br />
this method was also investigated.<br />
: A s<strong>of</strong>tware tool was developed to calculate<br />
dose parameters using seed locations and <strong>org</strong>an contours exported<br />
from a brachytherapy treatment planning system. ISDA analysis is<br />
defined as the following: for a plan with N seeds used, N additional<br />
plans are automatically generated by removing one individual seed at<br />
a time to simulate the impact <strong>of</strong> a seed being displaced far enough to<br />
have minimum effect on local dose. The dosimetric impact <strong>of</strong><br />
removing each seed is quantified by the reduction <strong>of</strong> V<strong>10</strong>0 in each<br />
new plan. Although this approach assumes the extreme case in which<br />
a seed is completely missing, the result reflects the dosimetric<br />
sensitivity <strong>of</strong> positioning error for each individual seed. 'Critical<br />
seeds', defined as those whose displacement resulted in greater than<br />
0.5% V<strong>10</strong>0 reduction, are identified. The number <strong>of</strong> 'critical seed' per<br />
plan can be used to quantify robustness <strong>of</strong> treatment plans. To<br />
demonstrate this tool, a planning study and a retrospective case study<br />
were conducted. For planning study, 48 treatment plans were created<br />
independently by 3 experienced planners using ultrasound images<br />
from 8 patients (volumes 28 to 53cc; mean 39cc) and same dosimetric<br />
requirements. Each planner created one I<strong>12</strong>5 plan (145Gy,<br />
0.5U/seed) and one Pd<strong>10</strong>3 plan (<strong>12</strong>5Gy, 2.5U/seed) for each patient.<br />
ISDA analysis was performed for all plans. For retrospective patient<br />
case study, 73 patients' OR preplans were analyzed and number <strong>of</strong><br />
'critical seed' for each plan obtained. The postimplant CT dosimetry<br />
results were used to test the correlation between number <strong>of</strong> 'critical<br />
seed' and actual dosimetry outcome.<br />
: The results <strong>of</strong> the planning study are shown in the table 1a.<br />
The dose perturbation caused by displacing 'critical seed' is more<br />
significant than average seed, indicating the plans with more 'critical<br />
seeds' are more susceptible to seed displacement error during the<br />
seed implantation. Among 73 patients analyzed using ISDA, 52<br />
patients' plans had less than 5 'critical seeds' and 21 patients' plan had<br />
5 or more 'critical seeds'. The average postimplant CT V<strong>10</strong>0 and D90<br />
from both patient groups are shown in the table 1b. Plans with more<br />
'critical seeds' showed statistically significant correlation with inferior<br />
dosimetric results.<br />
: A method and s<strong>of</strong>tware tool to perform ISDA was<br />
developed and demonstrated on prostate seed implant cases. 'Critical<br />
seeds' could exist in both I<strong>12</strong>5 or Pd<strong>10</strong>3 based plans and number <strong>of</strong><br />
'critical seed' in clinical plans shows direct correlation to the<br />
dosimetric outcome. This tool can be utilized to guide the treatment<br />
planning process to develop more robust plans and therefore to<br />
minimize the potential effect <strong>of</strong> seed displacement errors.<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 15<br />
OC35<br />
CBCT GUIDED INTRAOPERATIVE DYNAMIC DOSIMETRY SIGNIFICANTLY<br />
IMPROVES DOSIMETRY FOR I<strong>12</strong>5 PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
R. Westendorp 1 , J. Immerzeel 2 , R. Kattevilder 2 , C. Hoekstra 2 , S. van<br />
de Pol 2 , T. Nuver 1 , A. Minken 1<br />
1<br />
RISO, Physics, Deventer, The Netherlands<br />
2<br />
RISO, Radiotherapy, Deventer, The Netherlands<br />
: To report the dosimetry results and the clinical<br />
experience obtained with routine Cone Beam CT (CBCT) guided intra<br />
operative dynamic dosimetry for 900 prostate patients.<br />
: 900 Patients received transperineal <strong>12</strong>5 I<br />
brachytherapy for prostate cancer over a period <strong>of</strong> 5 years. Treatment<br />
was performed as 145 Gy monotherapy (82%) or as a boost (1<strong>10</strong> Gy)<br />
with external beam radiotherapy. Several weeks prior to the<br />
implantation procedure a volume study was performed to assess the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> seeds needed. At the same time four fiducial markers were<br />
implanted.<br />
The implantation procedure took place in the operating theater, seeds<br />
were placed under TransRectal UltraSound (TRUS) guidance with<br />
interactive planning. After implantation <strong>of</strong> the seeds, a TRUSscan was<br />
obtained to contour the prostate and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk. The positions <strong>of</strong><br />
the implanted seeds were determined using a CBCTscan that was<br />
merged with the TRUS images using the fiducial markers as landmarks.<br />
Dose calculation was performed on this combined imageset. If<br />
dosimetry was deemed inadequate due to underdosage in critical<br />
areas a correction plan was made and remedial seeds were implanted.<br />
Final dosimetry was performed on new TRUS and CBCT images. The<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> this procedure was assessed on Day 0 and Day 30 by<br />
analyzing D90 and V<strong>10</strong>0 for the prostate and the dose to the <strong>org</strong>ans at<br />
risk.<br />
The effect <strong>of</strong> the remedial seeds was quantified by excluding their<br />
dosecontribution at the postimplant plans and compare the resulting<br />
dosimetry with the real postimplant dosimetry.<br />
: Immediately after implantation for 181 (20%) <strong>of</strong> the patients<br />
a critical underdosage was observed and remedial seeds were placed.<br />
In 2007 in 25% <strong>of</strong> the cases remedial seeds were placed, that reduced<br />
to 11% in 2011. On average 3.9 (st dev 1.6) seeds were added.<br />
Directly after correction, the mean D90 increased from 96% to <strong>10</strong>8%,<br />
V<strong>10</strong>0 increased from 85% to 95%.On Day 30 the dosimetry was adequate<br />
for all patients, indicating effective adaptation <strong>of</strong> initially underdosed<br />
areas in the prostate. With remedial seeds excluded in the corrected<br />
cases on Day 30, the simulated mean D90 and V<strong>10</strong>0 decreased with <strong>12</strong>%<br />
and 4% respectively. Without the reimplantation procedure on Day 30<br />
11% <strong>of</strong> all patients would have had a lower V<strong>10</strong>0 or D90 than we<br />
intended.<br />
The reimplantation procedure took on average <strong>10</strong> minutes <strong>of</strong> extra<br />
time.<br />
<br />
: Intraoperative dynamic dosimetry with CBCT allows<br />
improvement <strong>of</strong> dosimetry for a considerable group <strong>of</strong> patients at Day<br />
0 and Day 30. This reduces the need to correct the implants after<br />
finishing the operating theater procedure. The presented procedure is<br />
used routinely and takes about <strong>10</strong> minutes <strong>of</strong> additional time.<br />
OC36<br />
VALIDATION STUDY OF USBASED HDR PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
PLANNING COMPARED TO CT GOLD STANDARD<br />
M. Gaztanaga 1 , J. Crook 1 , C. Araujo 2 , M. Schmidt 2 , F. Bachand 1 , D.<br />
Batchelar 2<br />
1<br />
British Columbia Cancer Agency, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Kelowna, Canada<br />
2<br />
British Columbia Cancer Agency, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Physics,<br />
Kelowna, Canada<br />
: The use <strong>of</strong> US in a onestep procedure to both<br />
guide and plan HDRBT for prostate is growing. Phantom studies have<br />
favourably compared the accuracy <strong>of</strong> US needle tip reconstruction to<br />
the gold standard <strong>of</strong> CT. We seek to determine the accuracy <strong>of</strong> US<br />
needle tip reconstruction in vivo using conebeam CT (CBCT) as our<br />
reference standard<br />
: Treatment comprised 46 Gy/23 fractions <strong>of</strong><br />
EBRT plus 20Gy/2 HDRBT fractions, replacing the EBRT on days 5 and<br />
15. Each BT fraction was performed under general anesthetic with<br />
paralysis. A median <strong>of</strong> 16 needles (range 1618) were placed and their<br />
tips identified using live TRUS images and Varian's Vitesse s<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />
Needle protrusion length from the template was recorded as each tip<br />
was located. This allowed for reverification prior to capturing images<br />
for planning. The needles remained locked in the template which<br />
remained fixed to the stepper while a set <strong>of</strong> 3D TRUS images was<br />
acquired to reconstruct the needle paths and plan the HDRBT<br />
treatment. Following treatment, the legs were lowered from 90° to<br />
40° to acquire a set <strong>of</strong> CBCT images. Needles were continuously<br />
monitored on live US to rule out any SUPINF needle displacement<br />
while repositioning legs.<br />
Needles were reconstructed postoperatively in the CBCT images using<br />
Varian's BrachyVision TPS. CTidentified needles were also adjusted<br />
for protrusion length if ≥2mm displacement was observed. The<br />
coordinates <strong>of</strong> each needle tip in either CT or US were recorded from<br />
the TPS. As the origin <strong>of</strong> the coordinate system was unique to each<br />
individual image set, the tip <strong>of</strong> a needle positioned directly above the
S16 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
US probe was chosen as a reference point for each pair <strong>of</strong> USCBCT<br />
images. The cranialcaudal position <strong>of</strong> each needle tip was then<br />
determined relative to this point in each image set. Finally, the US<br />
based needle tip position was compared to the CTbased position. 21<br />
sets <strong>of</strong> needles from <strong>12</strong> consecutive patients have been analyzed. The<br />
data from the reference needles was excluded.<br />
: 318 needle tip positions have been compared between TRUS<br />
and CBCT. Of these 205 (64.5%) agreed within 1mm, 84 (26.4%) agreed<br />
within <strong>12</strong>mm, and 21 (6.6%) agreed within 23mm. For 8 needles the<br />
discrepancy between tip positions in the 2 modalities was more than<br />
3mm (2.6%).<br />
: US needle tip identification in vivo is at least as<br />
accurate as CT identification, while providing all the advantages <strong>of</strong> a<br />
onestep procedure.<br />
OC37<br />
THE PROSTATE TUMORLET PROJECT. CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF D90:<br />
TILTING AT WINDMILLS?<br />
D. Todor 1 , P.S. Lin 1 , I. Barani 2 , M. Axente 1 , M.P. Hagan 1 , M. Anscher 1<br />
1<br />
Virginia Commonwealth University, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />
Oncology, Richmond VA, USA<br />
2<br />
University <strong>of</strong> California, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, San<br />
Francisco CA, USA<br />
: In the PSA era, the small volume <strong>of</strong> disease and<br />
relatively small number <strong>of</strong> tumor foci (mean 2.5) prompted the idea<br />
<strong>of</strong> focal therapy. This work is a focibased analysis <strong>of</strong> LDR<br />
brachytherapy treatments designed for the whole prostate. We aim to<br />
identify the relationship between prostate D90 parameter and<br />
tumorlets' dose, and to describe the dose received by tumorlets in<br />
traditional whole prostate cancer treatments.This information will be<br />
used to create prescription guidelines for focal therapy.<br />
: A s<strong>of</strong>tware platform was built to create in<br />
silico prostate tumorlets, <strong>of</strong> specified morphology, volume and<br />
location. Actual knowledge <strong>of</strong> tumorlet location was replaced with<br />
statistical inference. Pre and postimplant plans for 14 patients,<br />
using Pd<strong>10</strong>3 and I<strong>12</strong>5, with prostate sizes from 2361 cm 3 were used.<br />
Tumorlets were grown in 9 volume categories from 0.1 to <strong>10</strong>cm 3 with<br />
<strong>10</strong>00 random tumorlets per category. Each tumorlet was superimposed<br />
over the 3D dose distribution and positional, morphological,<br />
dosimetric and radiobiological quantities were computed. The<br />
sensitivity <strong>of</strong> results to radiobiological parameters was assessed using<br />
two sets <strong>of</strong> parameters. A treatment reference was established using<br />
the BED EBRT equivalent <strong>of</strong> a 78Gy regimen (2Gy/fx).<br />
: The preplans were consistent, despite variations in prostate<br />
size, seeds number and planner. With D90=118.9 ±2.4%, the whole<br />
prostate EUBED was on average 135.8Gy3. By comparison, BEDo for the<br />
EBRT regimen was ~130Gy3. In all preplan scenarios, tumorlet<br />
parameters were virtually immune to volume, location or morphology<br />
variations. EUBED and gBEUD told very similar stories, with 98<strong>10</strong>0% <strong>of</strong><br />
all tumorlet volumes receiving a gBEUD and EUBED > BEDo. When<br />
separated in 'small' (0.11cc) and 'large' (2<strong>10</strong>cc) volumes, the small<br />
tumorlets were a bit more likely to get an EUBED > BEDo than large<br />
tumorlets (by ~6%). Unlike preplans, the CT based postimplant<br />
evaluations told a dramatically different story (see example in Fig 1).<br />
Uncorrelated with their high D90 (range 91.7<strong>12</strong>5.5%), the probability<br />
<strong>of</strong> any tumorlet to have EUBED > BEDo was on average only 60% with<br />
the 'small' tumorlets having a significant advantage, 79% vs. 46%, over<br />
'large' ones. While trends were similar, EUBED and gBEUD were<br />
significantly different, with an average probability <strong>of</strong> values greater<br />
then BEDo <strong>of</strong> 60% according to EUBED and 83% based on gBEUD.<br />
: Biological dose received by tumorlets in prostate shows<br />
that the D90 parameter is more meaningful for a highly <strong>org</strong>anized<br />
seed implant (true for preplans and maybe stranded seeds). For<br />
poorly structured or dis<strong>org</strong>anized implants, even a D90 > <strong>12</strong>5% can<br />
produce suboptimal results at the level <strong>of</strong> foci <strong>of</strong> disease. A smaller<br />
α/β will further amplify this effect. Also, I<strong>12</strong>5 implants seems more<br />
impacted than Pd<strong>10</strong>3.These results indicate that the architecture <strong>of</strong><br />
the implant likely plays an important role and D90 alone is limited in<br />
meaning. Smaller than prostate subvolumes are likely to be the true<br />
target explaining the positive clinical outcome in these cases.<br />
OC38<br />
BIOCHEMICAL DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL OF 3D IMAGE GUIDED<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY BOOST WITHIN A PERMANENT SEED IMPLANT.<br />
A.G. Martin 1 , S. Aubin 1 , N. Varfalvy 1 , E. Vigneault 1 , E. Vigneault 1 , L.<br />
Beaulieu 1 , P. Després 1<br />
1<br />
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec L'HôtelDieu de Québec,<br />
Radio Oncologie, Quebec, Canada<br />
: This study looks at the biochemical disease free<br />
survival <strong>of</strong> a Real Time Intraoperative Planned (RTIOP) 3D Image<br />
Guided <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> Boost within a Permanent Seed Implant (PSI)<br />
and compares to our standard RTIOP approach. Could an inverse<br />
planned focalized boost to the known pathologic disease sites improve<br />
local DFS while protecting sensitive zone within the GTV?<br />
: Using a high precision 3D US implant<br />
guidance, we planned and implanted a boost area to multiple core<br />
biopsies sites within the prostate. 1617 localized prostate cancer<br />
patients (median age = 64 years old), were consecutively treated with<br />
RTIOP/PSI. Starting in 2003, 203 (BG) had prostate topographic biopsy<br />
results and a boost was delivered to the dominant involved lesion<br />
(DIL). 1414 patients were treated without boost. Treatment delivery<br />
was made using an integrated system with 3D ultrasound, RTIOP<br />
dosimetry and robotic seed delivery (FIRST, Nucletron). Plans were<br />
generated using a simulated annealing inverse planning algorithm<br />
(IPSA). The planning objectives are a dose coverage <strong>of</strong> 144 Gy (PD)<br />
with margin <strong>of</strong> 34 mm. V150 (V200) covers ≤ 2/3(1/3) <strong>of</strong> the prostate<br />
volume. The urethra D<strong>10</strong> should received ≤216 Gy and the D5 should<br />
be ≤220 Gy. Finally, the boost volume (BV) is to be covered by 216 Gy.<br />
Toxicities were reported, compared and published. Biochemical<br />
disease free survival is presented and pattern <strong>of</strong> failure is described.<br />
: 203 (BG) localized prostate cancer were treated using a boost<br />
with RTIOP. They consisted in low risk for the majority. 7,9% being<br />
intermediate risk tumor according to D'Amico's risk definition. At<br />
42,97 (579) months median, only 3 failures were reported (cure rate<br />
<strong>of</strong> 98,5%). All 3 were metastatic disease at recurrence. One <strong>of</strong> them<br />
had prostatic biopsy, which did not reveal cancer. As compared to our<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 17<br />
reference cohort <strong>of</strong> 1414 patients, 95,4% were cured at a median<br />
followup <strong>of</strong> 57 (1194) months median. (Figure 1)<br />
: Considering a shorter followup, usage <strong>of</strong> a DIL Boost in<br />
permanent prostate cancer has proven to equally tolerate and may<br />
well prove to give a better local control on the long run.<br />
<br />
OC39<br />
OUTCOME OF IMAGE GUIDED ADAPTIVE BRACHYTHERAPY IN LOCALLY<br />
ADVANCED CERVICAL CANCER<br />
J.C. Lindegaard 1 , L. Fokdal 1 , S.K. Nielsen 2 , L.L. Røhl 3 , E.M. Pedersen 3 ,<br />
L.K. Petersen 4 , E.S. Hansen 5 , K. Tanderup 6<br />
1<br />
Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Aarhus,<br />
Denmark<br />
2<br />
Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics, Aarhus,<br />
Denmark<br />
3<br />
Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology, Aarhus,<br />
Denmark<br />
4<br />
Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Gynecology, Aarhus,<br />
Denmark<br />
5<br />
Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Pathology, Aarhus,<br />
Denmark<br />
6<br />
Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus University, Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Oncology Institute <strong>of</strong> Clinical Medicine, Aarhus, Denmark<br />
: Clinical outcome data are sparse on imaging<br />
guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in locally advanced cervical<br />
cancer. We report the results <strong>of</strong> our first 5 year experience with MRI<br />
based IGABT using the GEC ESTRO guidelines.<br />
: From 200620<strong>10</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 145 consecutive pts<br />
(median age 55 [2784]) were treated with IGABT. Five pts were<br />
excluded: 3 pts with aberrant histology/uncertain origin (2 clear cell,<br />
1 transitio cell) and 2 pts with distant progression during treatment.<br />
Histology <strong>of</strong> the 140 included pts showed squamous cell carcinoma in<br />
83%, adenocarcinoma in <strong>12</strong>% and adenosquamous carcinoma in 5%.<br />
FIGO stage distribution was: IB 11%, IIA 4%, IIB 55%, IIIA 5%, IIIB 19%,<br />
IVA 4% and IVB 2%. All pts received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT)<br />
4550 Gy/2530 fx. Concomitant weekly cisplatin was used in 1<strong>10</strong> pts<br />
(79%). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (24 courses <strong>of</strong> cisplatin, 5FU &<br />
ifosfamide) was employed in 8 pts with very advanced locoregional<br />
disease. PDRBT was given with 23 implants delivering <strong>10</strong>20 hourly<br />
pulses per BT fraction. Of the 300 implants, 188 (63%) were pure<br />
tandemring intracavitary implants and 1<strong>12</strong> (37%) consisted <strong>of</strong> a<br />
combined intracavitary/interstitial implant using the ring as template<br />
for transvaginal implantation <strong>of</strong> needles. A BT applicator guided<br />
stereotactic IMRT boost was used in 2 pts. Dose planning was based on<br />
1.5 or 3T MRI. Planning aim for the cumulative dose <strong>of</strong> EBRT+BT<br />
calculated as equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions was a D90 ≥ 85 Gy for<br />
high risk clinical target volume (HR CTV) (α/β=<strong>10</strong>, repair half time<br />
1.5h). For OAR the DVH constrains were 90 Gy for the minimal dose to<br />
the D2cc <strong>of</strong> bladder and 7075 Gy for the D2cc <strong>of</strong> rectum, sigmoid and<br />
bowel (α/β=3, repair half time 1.5h).<br />
: Planning aim for HR CTV was reached in 89% <strong>of</strong> the pts (Table<br />
1). The bladder constrain was respected in all pts whereas the 70 Gy<br />
constraint for rectum, sigmoid and bowel was realised in 87%, 79% and<br />
92% <strong>of</strong> the pts, respectively. D2cc > 75 Gy for rectum and sigmoid was<br />
found in 1% and 2% <strong>of</strong> the pts. Median followup time was 31 months.<br />
Five pts had persistent disease and 5 pts developed local recurrence.<br />
Local control (LC), cancer specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) at 3<br />
years was 91%, 86% and 78%, respectively. HR CTV D90 ≥ 90.4 Gy<br />
(median) was prognostic for LC (p=0.0004), CSS (p=0.027) and OS<br />
(p=0.024) in univariate analysis. HR CTV volume < 29.6 cc (median)<br />
was prognostic for LC (p=0.006) and CSS (P=0.016) but not for OS.<br />
Influence <strong>of</strong> HR CTV dose and HR CTV volume on LC is shown in Figure<br />
1. Actuarial late G3G4 morbidity (CTCv3.0) for bladder, rectum,<br />
sigmoid and/or bowel was 5% (3 pts). Vaginal G3 morbidity (stenosis)<br />
was seen in 4 pts with vaginal involvement at diagnosis.<br />
DVH Parameter Mean (Gy, EQD2) SD<br />
HR CTV D90 91.0 5.9<br />
IR CTV D90 67.5 6.5<br />
Bladder, ICRU point 65.9 9.2<br />
Bladder D2cc 71.0 6.3<br />
Rectum, ICRU point 65.9 6.8<br />
Rectum D2cc 64.0 5.4<br />
Sigmoid D2cc 65.3 6.0<br />
Bowel D2cc * 60.8 6.6<br />
*<br />
D2cc for bowel only systematically reported since September 2008<br />
(72 pts)<br />
: We confirm that MRI guided IGABT provides a high dose<br />
to the tumour and a low dose to OAR resulting in excellent local<br />
control and survival with very limited late morbidity even in extensive<br />
disease.<br />
OC40<br />
IMAGE GUIDED BRACHYTHERAPY ENDS THE DEBATE OF SYSTEMATIC<br />
RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY IN LOCALLY ADVANCED CERVICAL CANCER<br />
R. Mazeron 1 , J. Gilmore 1 , I. Dumas 2 , J. Champoudry 2 , J. Goulart 1 , B.<br />
Vanneste 1 , A. Tailleur 1 , P. Morice 3 , C. HaieMeder 1<br />
1 Institut Gustave Roussy, Radiation Oncology, Villejuif, France<br />
2 Institut Gustave Roussy, Medical Physics, Villejuif, France<br />
3 Institut Gustave Roussy, Surgical Oncology, Villejuif, France<br />
: To evaluate the outcomes <strong>of</strong> 3D image guided<br />
brachytherapy (IGABT) after concomitant chemoradiation (CCT) in<br />
locally advanced cervical cancer.<br />
: As part <strong>of</strong> the retroEMBRACE revisory group,<br />
clinical data from patients treated at Institut GustaveRoussy from<br />
2004 to 2009 with curative intent IGABT after CCT were reviewed.<br />
Patients received pelvic +/ paraaortic CCT (4550.4 Gy) followed by<br />
MRI or CT guided pulsed dose rate BT. BT was performed according to<br />
GECESTRO guidelines. Additional nodal or parametrial EBRT boosts<br />
were performed when indicated. In a first period, stage I or II patients<br />
systematically underwent radical hysterectomy or were <strong>of</strong>fered a<br />
randomized study comparing hysterectomy versus observation in case<br />
<strong>of</strong> complete remission. Following the results <strong>of</strong> this trial,<br />
hysterectomy was limited to salvage treatment.<br />
: Of 163 patients identified, 27% had stage 1B, 6% IIA, 51% IIB,<br />
3% IIIA, 9% IIIB and 3% IVA. At diagnosis, median tumour volume was 55<br />
cm 3 This abstract forms part <strong>of</strong><br />
the <strong>of</strong>ficial conference media programme<br />
and will be available on the day <strong>of</strong> presentation.<br />
(3269). Squamous cell carcinoma was the commonest histological<br />
subtype (87%). Nodal involvement was noticed in 37% <strong>of</strong> the patients;<br />
among them, 15% had para aortic involvement. Ninety percents<br />
received concomitant chemotherapy and 18% received pelvic plus<br />
paraaortic EBRT. BT was based on MRI in 88% <strong>of</strong> the cases and on CT
S18 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
for the remaining <strong>12</strong>%. Vaginal personalized mould was used in the<br />
majority <strong>of</strong> applications (95%), with an intracavitary technique in all<br />
cases except two. The doses delivered (EBRT + BT, in EqD2) were<br />
67.1+/6.4 Gy (α/β=<strong>10</strong>) to 90% <strong>of</strong> the IRCTV, 78.1+/9.6 Gy (α/β=<strong>10</strong>)<br />
to 90% <strong>of</strong> the HRCTV. The D2cc for the bladder, rectum and sigmoid<br />
were 67.8+/6.7 Gy, 58.8+/5.9 Gy and 58.3 Gy+/5.7 (α/β=3)<br />
respectively. Sixtyone patients (37%) underwent a radical<br />
hysterectomy. Macroscopic residual disease was found in 13 cases.<br />
With a median followup <strong>of</strong> 36 months (579), 45 patients had<br />
relapsed. Twelve local relapses were reported (5 central and 7 lateral<br />
+/ central), <strong>of</strong> which 4 were isolated. There were 22 nodal failures<br />
(<strong>10</strong> pelvic and <strong>12</strong> paraaortic) and 28 metastatic relapses. At the time<br />
<strong>of</strong> failure, 70.4% <strong>of</strong> the patients had distant metastasis, and this was<br />
isolated in more than a half. The 3 year OS and DFS were 84% and 73%<br />
respectively. Local control was 92% and pelvic control was 86%. Local<br />
control decreased in relation to the initial tumour width: 97% for<br />
S20 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
obtain comparable doses to the target volumes. Dose deescalation<br />
and normalisation to a HR CTV D90 <strong>of</strong> 85 Gy resulted in low point A<br />
doses in a significant number <strong>of</strong> patients. Studying dose deescalation<br />
for small tumours at BT and reducing the vaginal loading may be a<br />
further step for better therapeutic gain. This hypothesis needs to be<br />
tested in a prospective clinical study.<br />
OC45<br />
FEASIBILITY OF ADC MAPPING IN ASSESSMENT OF TUMOR RESPONSE IN<br />
MRIBASED HDR BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CERVICAL CANCER<br />
K. Hosseinzadeh 1 , M.S. Rajagopalan 2 , S. Beriwal 2<br />
1<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh Medical Center, Radiology, Pittsburgh PA,<br />
USA<br />
2<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology,<br />
Pittsburgh PA, USA<br />
: GECESTRO recommends T2weighted MRI for<br />
assessment <strong>of</strong> residual disease and 3D high doserate brachytherapy<br />
(HDRBT) planning for cervical cancer. It can be difficult to distinguish<br />
radiation changes from residual tumor on this sequence. Diffusion<br />
weighted imaging (DWI) is sensitive to diffusion <strong>of</strong> water molecules in<br />
tissue and has shown promise in characterizing pathological processes<br />
at a microscopic level. Tumor cell death and corresponding changes in<br />
water homeostasis are reflected in increased apparent diffusion<br />
coefficients (ADC) on DWI. The goal <strong>of</strong> this study was to determine the<br />
feasibility <strong>of</strong> ADC mapping with ring and tandem applicator in place<br />
and to compare the response to therapy with conventional T2<br />
weighted sequence.<br />
: Patients diagnosed with cervical cancer<br />
underwent MRIbased HDRBT. PreEBRT MRI (preRT MRI) was<br />
compared to the final treatment planning MRI during HDRBT (postRT<br />
MRI). Patients without T2 signal abnormality on any postRT MRI were<br />
excluded from the study. All studies were interpreted by a board<br />
certified radiologist experienced in pelvic MRI. Signal intensity was<br />
measured in the tumor volume (T2Tumor) and in the psoas muscle<br />
(T2Psoas) by drawing a region<strong>of</strong>interest. In a similar fashion,<br />
corresponding tumor ADC values were measured. The T2 signal <strong>of</strong> the<br />
tumor was then normalized by calculating the ratio between T2<br />
Tumor and T2Psoas (T2Ratio). Treatment response was determined<br />
using a paired ttest for T2 Tumor, T2ratio, and ADC values.<br />
: 11 patients with both preRT and postRT MRI performed at<br />
the same institution were included. Average age was 48.9 years and<br />
91% had squamous cell histology. In the postRT images, T2Tumor<br />
was significantly lower than that in the preRT images (418.5 vs.<br />
605.6, p=0.03) and there was no difference in T2Psoas. T2Ratio<br />
demonstrated a statistically significant decrease with treatment (1.7<br />
vs. 2.6, p=0.04). In three patients in whom the T2Tumor increased in<br />
the postRT study (mean: +37.8%), the T2Ratio decreased (mean: <br />
38.4%). ADC values demonstrated a highly significant increase with<br />
treatment (1509.9 vs. <strong>10</strong>37.0, p
S22 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
Spain<br />
4 Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Oncologia Medica, Pamplona, Spain<br />
: To determine the impact <strong>of</strong> implant sequence<br />
(perioperative vs. postoperative) in patients with resected squamous<br />
cell head and neck cancer treated with adjuvant HDR brachytherapy.<br />
: From 2000 to 2011, 78 patients (57 men and<br />
21 women, median age 57 years, range, 3293) were implanted either<br />
at the time <strong>of</strong> surgery (Perioperative Group) or at a variable length <strong>of</strong><br />
time after surgery (Postoperative Group). Both groups were well<br />
matched with regards to the quality <strong>of</strong> the surgical margins. One third<br />
<strong>of</strong> the cases received HDR brachytherapy as the only adjuvant to a<br />
total dose <strong>of</strong> 32 Gy in 8 b.i.d treatments for R0 resections and 40 Gy<br />
in <strong>10</strong> b.i.d treatments for R1 resections. Twothirds <strong>of</strong> the cases<br />
received HDR brachytherapy to a total dose <strong>of</strong> 16 Gy for R0 resections<br />
and 24 Gy in 6 b.i.d treatments for R1 resections combined with a<br />
median <strong>of</strong> 45Gy <strong>of</strong> External Irradiation (EBRT) or chemoradiation.<br />
: The entire treatment length (surgery to end <strong>of</strong> irradiation)<br />
was shorter in perioperative patients than in postoperative patients<br />
(71 days vs. 98.5 days; p=0.0001). The rate <strong>of</strong> Grade ≥3 RTOG<br />
complications in perioperative and postoperative patients were 44.2%<br />
and 23.1%, respectively (p=0.088). After a median followup <strong>of</strong> 7.1<br />
years (0.6<strong>10</strong>.9), the <strong>10</strong>year actuarial local control rates in<br />
perioperative and postoperative patients were 85.4% and 73.3%,<br />
respectively (p=ns) and the <strong>10</strong>year actuarial locoregional control<br />
rates were 78.2% and 45.2%, respectively (p=0.01). Diseasefree<br />
survival rates in perioperative and postoperative patients at <strong>10</strong> years<br />
were 54.1% and 15.8% (p=ns) and overall survival rates at <strong>10</strong> years<br />
were 62.4% and 15.5%, respectively (p=ns).<br />
: The use <strong>of</strong> perioperative brachytherapy allows an earlier<br />
completion <strong>of</strong> the adjuvant irradiation program. This may be an<br />
advantage in terms <strong>of</strong> locoregional control although at the expense <strong>of</strong><br />
an increased toxicity.<br />
OC53<br />
FROM LOW DOSE RATE TO HIGH DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY IN LIP<br />
CARCINOMA: SAME RESULTS BUT LESS COMPLICATIONS<br />
J.L. Guinot 1 , L. Arribas 1 , M.I. Tortajada 1 , M. Carrascosa 1 , M. Santos 1 ,<br />
P. Soler 1 , A. Mut 1 , C. Pesudo 1 , M.L. Chust 1<br />
1<br />
Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Valencia, Spain<br />
: Low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy (BT) has been<br />
used during several decades to treat lip carcinomas. Nowadays it has<br />
been replaced by high dose rate (HDR) but very few cases have been<br />
reported in the literature. We compare our experience with LDR and<br />
HDR in lip carcinoma in a single institution.<br />
: From 1990 to 1997, 99 patients with invasive<br />
lip carcinoma were treated with LDR BT and from 1999 to 20<strong>10</strong>, <strong>10</strong>4<br />
consecutive patients were treated with HDR BT. Mean age was 67 and<br />
72 years old. Distribution by stage T1, T2, T3, T4 was 53.5%, 15.1%,<br />
3.1%, 28.3% with LDR and 52.9%, 32,7%, 0%, 14,4% with HDR. N0 were<br />
92.9% and 92.3% respectively. Some cases were treated after surgery<br />
with positive margin (34.3% with LDR and 16.3% with HDR) and with<br />
external beam radiation therapy plus BT (8.1% vs 2.9%). Parallel<br />
metallic needles in a triangle shape fixed with templates were used in<br />
<strong>10</strong>0% <strong>of</strong> HDR and 76% <strong>of</strong> LDR cases, and plastic tubes in 24% <strong>of</strong> LDR<br />
cases. All HDR patients were treated in five days, most <strong>of</strong> them with 9<br />
fractions <strong>of</strong> 4.55 Gy at 90% isodose, twice a day, to a total dose <strong>of</strong><br />
40.545 Gy.<br />
: The median followup was 63 and 51 months with LDR and<br />
HDR BT. Five patients suffered local relapse in each group. Overall<br />
local control, in T1, T2 and T4 were 94.9%, <strong>10</strong>0%, 86.6%, 89.3% with<br />
LDR and 95.2%, <strong>10</strong>0%, 94.1%, 80% with HDR. With surgical salvage,<br />
definitive local control was 97% and 98.1% respectively. Disease free<br />
survival was 95.9% vs 94.2%. S<strong>of</strong>t tissue necrosis and bone necrosis<br />
were 15.1% and 1% with LDR but with HDR there was no case <strong>of</strong><br />
necrosis. A fair or bad cosmetic result was described in 11.1% <strong>of</strong> LDR<br />
cases but none <strong>of</strong> HDR cases.<br />
: Both series are similar in characteristics. HDR BT with<br />
rigid needles is a simple technique with very good long term results<br />
and very few complications with nine fractions during five days. Local<br />
control and disease free survival are just the same with LDR and HDR,<br />
but late complications are minimal with HDR and less than with LDR<br />
BT. Cosmetic results are better due to the excellent dose<br />
homogeneity, therefore HDR BT can be recommended as a standard in<br />
lip carcinoma with this treatment regimen.<br />
OC54<br />
LONG TERM OUTCOMES OF INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY IN SOFT<br />
TISSUE SARCOMAS<br />
S. Laskar 1 , A. Puri 2 , A. Gulia 2 , B. Rekhi 3 , S. Juvekar 4 , S. Desai 3 , S.<br />
Desai 4 , S. Gupta 5 , J. Ghosh 5 , N. Jambhekar 3<br />
1<br />
Tata Memorial Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Mumbai, India<br />
2<br />
Tata Memorial Hospital, Surgical Oncology, Mumbai, India<br />
3<br />
Tata Memorial Hospital, Pathology, Mumbai, India<br />
4<br />
Tata Memorial Hospital, Radiology, Mumbai, India<br />
5<br />
Tata Memorial Hospital, Medical Oncology, Mumbai, India<br />
: To evaluate the clinical outcomes & long term<br />
adverse effects <strong>of</strong> interstitial brachytherapy (BRT) for adult patients<br />
with s<strong>of</strong>t tissue sarcomas (STS).<br />
: From July 1990 to June 2008, 198 patients<br />
(median age 42 years, range 1890) with STS received BRT as part <strong>of</strong><br />
locoregional treatment at our institute. There were <strong>12</strong>8 males and 70<br />
females, majority (n=138, 69.6%) had primary lesions. Spindle cell<br />
sarcoma (26%) was the commonest histological type, and 52.5% had<br />
highgrade sarcomas. Treatment included wide local excision followed<br />
by BRT with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Eighty one<br />
patients (41%) received BRT alone.<br />
: The <strong>10</strong>year local control (LC), diseasefree survival (DFS),<br />
and overall survival (OS) were 77.1%, 62.6%, and 70.8%, respectively.<br />
Patients receiving a combination <strong>of</strong> BRT and EBRT had comparable LC<br />
to those receiving BRT alone (76.1% vs. 81.6%, p=0.081). There was no<br />
significant difference in LC for patients receiving LDR vs. HDR BRT<br />
(75.1% vs. 80.9%, p=0.<strong>12</strong>0). Postbrachytherapy, surgical wound<br />
healing complications was seen in 26 (13.1%) patients<br />
(delay/dehiscence: n = 15, wound infection: n =11). The 5yr<br />
cumulative incidence (CI) <strong>of</strong> RT related late toxicity was 28.5%<br />
(Subcutaneous fibrosis: 26.4%, limb oedema 7.4%, joint<br />
stiffness/arthritis: 6.6%, osteoradionecrosis: 2.4%, fracture: 2.4%).<br />
There was a trend towards reduction in late toxicity with the use <strong>of</strong><br />
BRT alone (5yr CI: 19.5% vs. 32.4%, p=0.081). One patient developed a<br />
second cancer (OGS). There were no BRT related vascular or nerve<br />
injuries.<br />
: Interstitial BRT with or without EBRT results in excellent<br />
outcome for patients with STS. Radical BRT alone, when used<br />
judiciously in select group <strong>of</strong> patients, results in excellent local<br />
control and functional outcome with reduced treatmentrelated<br />
morbidity.<br />
OC55<br />
LONGTERM RESULTS OF PDR BRACHYTHERAPY AS A BOOST IN<br />
SQUAMOUS CELL CANCERS OF THE ANAL CANAL<br />
D.P. Peiffert 1 , A. Haddad 1 , L. Rangeard 1 , I. Buchheit 2 , S. Huger 2 ,<br />
A.S. Baumann 1 , S. Oldrini 1<br />
1<br />
Centre Alexis Vautrin, Radiation Oncology, Vandoeuvre les Nancy,<br />
France<br />
2<br />
Centre Alexis Vautrin, Medical Physics, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France<br />
: Squamous cell cancers <strong>of</strong> the anal canal are<br />
generally managed with sphincterpreserving external beam<br />
radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. The boost to the primary<br />
tumour can be given with brachytherapy, thereby decreasing dose and<br />
toxicity to the tissues surrounding the anal canal. Previously, a<br />
National multicenter study demonstrated the feasibility <strong>of</strong><br />
brachytherapy using pulseddose rate delivery. We hereby report the<br />
longterm results <strong>of</strong> a large cohort <strong>of</strong> patients treated with this<br />
technique at a single center.<br />
: 99 patients with squamous or basaloid<br />
histology were treated between 1996 and 2007 in a sphincter<br />
preserving schedule by pelvic irradiation with a PDR brachytherapy<br />
boost. Cancers <strong>of</strong> the anal margin or with other histology were not<br />
included in this study. External beam radiotherapy <strong>of</strong> the pelvis<br />
delivered 45 Gy in 25 fractions <strong>of</strong> 1.8 Gy ( range 36 to 50.4 Gy with<br />
1,8 to 3,0 Gy per fraction). After a mean gap <strong>of</strong> 25 days, a PDR<br />
brachytherapy boost delivered a dose <strong>of</strong> 20 Gy (range <strong>10</strong>20Gy) with<br />
0.5 Gy per pulse every hour using a ring template with one plane <strong>of</strong> 3<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 23<br />
to 6 needles spaced at <strong>10</strong>mm . 58% <strong>of</strong> patients also received<br />
chemotherapy during the initial phase <strong>of</strong> treatment. Charts were<br />
retrospectively evaluated for local tumour control and long term<br />
toxicity.<br />
: Median followup for this cohort was 54 months. Clinical<br />
exam was performed by the brachytherapist every 3 months during<br />
the 2 first years, and every 6 months later. 85% <strong>of</strong> patients were<br />
female, and mean age was 62 years. Stage distribution was 15%, 69%,<br />
<strong>12</strong>% and 4% for T1, T2, T3 and T4, respectively. AJCC TNM staging was<br />
14%, 56% and 30% for stage I, II and III, respectively. Most commonly<br />
used chemotherapy regimen was cisplatinum and 5FU delivered<br />
during weeks 1 and 5 <strong>of</strong> the irradiation. 15 local recurrences were<br />
recorded, <strong>of</strong> which 6 were isolated. Recurrence rates by T stage were<br />
7%, 15% and 25% for T1, T2 and T3/4 tumours. Of 37 patients with T1<br />
2N0 tumours who did not undergo prophylactic inguinal irradiation, 5<br />
(14%) inguinal failures were recorded. Late grade 3 or 4 toxicity was<br />
as follows: 1 stool incontinence, 1 anal stenosis, and 11 s<strong>of</strong>t tissue<br />
necrosis. The actuarial colostomy free survival and prognostic factors<br />
will be presented.<br />
: Treatment <strong>of</strong> anal canal squamous carcinomas by PDR<br />
brachytherapy boost after external beam radiotherapy results in good<br />
local control rates comparable to historical series. The afterloading<br />
setup for PDR delivery is a safer alternative in terms <strong>of</strong> radiation<br />
exposure, and makes it the technique <strong>of</strong> choice to prescribe the dose<br />
rate and optimise the dose distribution, and is used in routine in our<br />
department.<br />
OC56<br />
BLADDER SPARING APPROACH WITH BRACHYTHERAPY IN <strong>10</strong>40<br />
PATIENTS<br />
B. Pieters 1 , L. Blank 1 , C. Koedooder 1 , R. van Os 1 , M. van de Kar 1 , E.<br />
Jansen 1 , E. Geijsen 1 , C. Koning 1<br />
1<br />
AMC, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands<br />
<br />
: Several French, Belgian and Dutch radiation<br />
oncologists have reported good results with the combination <strong>of</strong><br />
limited surgery followed by external beam radiotherapy and<br />
brachytherapy in early stage muscleinvasive bladder cancer. This<br />
approach has seldom been followed by others. This retrospective<br />
observational study investigates treatment outcome in the largest<br />
cohort <strong>of</strong> patients treated by brachytherapy for early stage muscle<br />
invasive bladder cancer.<br />
: Data from <strong>12</strong> out <strong>of</strong> 13 departments in The<br />
Netherlands using this approach have been collected and imported in<br />
a multicenter database The number <strong>of</strong> patients <strong>of</strong> this cohort was<br />
<strong>10</strong>40.<br />
Patients were treated by external beam radiotherapy (<strong>10</strong>55 Gy) and<br />
brachytherapy (2540 Gy and 5060 Gy). In 247 cases a partial<br />
cystectomy was performed.<br />
Results were analyzed according to tumor stage and diameter,<br />
histology grade, age and brachytherapy technique (Continuous Low<br />
Dose Rate (CLDR) and Pulsed Dose Rate (PDR)).<br />
: The age <strong>of</strong> patients ranged from 28 to 92 years. The gender<br />
distribution was 811 males and 229 females. There were 2 pT0, <strong>12</strong>6<br />
pT1, 797 pT2, <strong>10</strong>0 pT3, 1 pT4, and 8 pTx tumors. The distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
differentiation grade was 13 well, 167 moderately, 824 poorly, and 16<br />
undifferentiated.<br />
At 1, 3, and 5 years local control rates were 91%, 80%, and 75%,<br />
metastasisfree survival rates were 91%, 80%, and 74%, diseasefree<br />
survival rates were 85%, 68%, and 61% and overall survival rates were<br />
91%, 74%, and 62%, respectively. There were 136 patients with local<br />
recurrences only, 94 with both local recurrence and distant<br />
metastases and 145 with distant metastases only. Of the 232 local<br />
recurrences 49 were muscle invasive, 90 were nonmuscle invasive, 31<br />
both invasive and noninvasive, and 62 were unknown. Cystectomy as<br />
salvage treatment was performed in 60 patients.<br />
The differences in outcome between the contributing departments<br />
were small. After multivariate analysis the only factor influencing the<br />
local control rate was the brachytherapy technique in favor <strong>of</strong> PDR<br />
(HR 0.46; P = 0.004).<br />
: External beam radiotherapy followed by brachytherapy,<br />
combined with limited surgery <strong>of</strong>fers good results in terms <strong>of</strong> local<br />
control and bladder sparing for selected groups <strong>of</strong> patients suffering<br />
from earlystage muscle invasive bladder cancer. These patients<br />
should be counseled on the possibility for a bladder sparing procedure<br />
by the use <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy.<br />
All participating centers are acknowledged for the contribution:<br />
University Medical Center Utrecht, University Medical Center<br />
Groningen, Medical Center Haaglanden, Medisch Spectrum Twente,<br />
Institute Verbeeten, Radiotherapeutic Institute RISO, The Netherlands<br />
Cancer Institute / Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, University<br />
Medical Center Leiden, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Arnhem<br />
Radiotherapeutic Institute, Radiotherapeutic Institute Friesland,<br />
Academic Medical Center Amsterdam<br />
<br />
<br />
57<br />
PARTIAL BREAST IRRADIATION: FROM THE US SIDE<br />
R. Kuske 1<br />
1 Arizona Cancer Specialists, <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Scottsdale, USA<br />
<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> was the first method <strong>of</strong> breast irradiation. Radium<br />
needle brachytherapy was successfully used to treat breast cancer<br />
more than 50 years prior to the widespread use <strong>of</strong> linear accelerators<br />
to treat the entire breast. Indeed, Ge<strong>of</strong>frey Keynes, British Surgeon<br />
and brother to the famous economist John <strong>May</strong>nard Keynes, published<br />
his breastpreserving outcomes in 1938 in the British Medical Journal.<br />
His patients were treated with radium needles during the 1920s and<br />
1930s. His remarkable conclusion was stated in this historically<br />
important manuscript: “These results (with radium needle breast<br />
brachytherapy) compare favorably with the classic Halsted radical<br />
mastectomy.”<br />
In the US, modern breast brachytherapy began at the Ochsner Clinic in<br />
New Orleans, LA, in 1991. In our multidisciplinary clinic, a<br />
Venezuelan woman with T2N0M0 right breast cancer insisted upon a<br />
treatment option that “can return me to work and my family in one<br />
week.” Drawing on our brachytherapy experience with s<strong>of</strong>t tissue<br />
sarcoma after a compartmental resection, we delivered 45 Gy in 4<br />
days with low doserate Iridium192 to a target volume 2 cm beyond<br />
the surgical cavity edge.<br />
Pleased with the results in this original patient, we wrote a Phase II<br />
prospective clinical trial investigating 45 days widevolume breast<br />
brachytherapy as an alternative to conventional 6week whole breast<br />
irradiation in select breast cancers. This study accrured 162 patients<br />
and was initially reported in a matchedpair analysis.<br />
Two years later, William Beaumont Hospital in Michigan initiated a<br />
similar prospective Phase II clinical trial that has been widely<br />
published with similar longterm outcomes. In 1995, I designed and<br />
wrote RTOG 9517, the first modern multiinstitutional phase II<br />
clinical trial with interstitial bracytherapy PBI. This trial accrued<br />
briskly with excellent local control rates <strong>of</strong> 96% at 5 years and 95% at<br />
7 years. Current investigators do not give any credence to the earlier<br />
Guy’s Hospital Trial (Fentiman) or the Christie Hospital trial (Ribeiro)<br />
because <strong>of</strong> poor patient selection and absent quality control <strong>of</strong><br />
bracytherapy/electron beam dosimetry or target volume coverage.<br />
Interstitial brachytherapy was considered by many to be too skill<br />
dependent and invasive. These concerns spawned the MammoSite<br />
balloon catheter in 2002. The simplicity <strong>of</strong> this singlechannel single<br />
entry brachytherapy device popularized PBI in the US. Other single<br />
entry devices, such as the multichannel SAVI and Contura catheters,<br />
soon came into practice across the US, allowing more refined dose<br />
shaping. The ability to pull the brachytherapy dose cloud away from<br />
the skin is considered a major improvement, and further increased PBI<br />
use in the US. It is currently estimated that up to 20% <strong>of</strong> eligible<br />
patients are receiving PBI in many areas <strong>of</strong> the US.<br />
The ultimate test <strong>of</strong> a new treatment or potential paradigm shift is<br />
considered to be the prospective randomized clinical trial. NSABP B<br />
39/RTOG 0413 has accrued 4050 out <strong>of</strong> a planned 4300 women as <strong>of</strong><br />
January 20<strong>12</strong>. This study may close in January, 2013. There are<br />
currently 9 phase III clinical trials investigating PBI across the world,<br />
attesting to the significance <strong>of</strong> this concept to patients and<br />
oncologists alike. Singledose intraoperative methods <strong>of</strong> delivering<br />
PBI, such as Intrabeam and intraoperative electrons, are also under<br />
investigation.
S24 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
In summary, a 21year experience with PBI in the US has inspired a<br />
plethora <strong>of</strong> scientific endeavors. Lumpectomy, sentinel node<br />
mapping, and PBI may <strong>of</strong>fer women with select breast cancers the<br />
highest quality <strong>of</strong> life and breast conservation.<br />
58<br />
PARTIAL BREAST IRRADIATION: FROM THE EUROPEAN SIDE<br />
E. Van Limbergen<br />
University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium<br />
Abstract not received<br />
<br />
<br />
59<br />
HOW CAN BRACHYTHERAPY BE MORE SYSTEMATICALLY USED IN<br />
EMERGING COUNTRIES<br />
R. Bilimagga 1<br />
1<br />
Bangalore Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Bangalore,<br />
India<br />
This can be broadly divided into<br />
a) Resources (Equipment and Manpower)<br />
b) Policies<br />
c) Strategies<br />
a) RESOURCES (Equipment and Manpower)<br />
In view <strong>of</strong> the financial resource crunch in these countries, we have to<br />
consider several factors to help brachytherapy be used more<br />
systematically in the emerging economies. Some <strong>of</strong> these<br />
considerations would be :<br />
1 ) Identifying common cancers occurring in a specific geographic<br />
location helps in choosing an appropriate brachytherapy equipment<br />
for a defined population.<br />
2) Choosing a long halflife brachytherapy isotope will reduce the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> source change expenses (Eg : Cobalt≈Iridium).<br />
3) Efficacy <strong>of</strong> Xray based brachytherapy to reduce the cost<br />
4) Number <strong>of</strong> channels in HDR (3≈18 or more) Lower channels can be<br />
selected.<br />
5) In areas where the patient volume is less, LDR (Low dose rate)<br />
brachytherapy can be used & HDR (High dose rate) can be used where<br />
high volume is present.<br />
6) Cost <strong>of</strong> the manpower training can be reduced by imparting local<br />
onsite training through collaborations with the vendors or through<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional associations like IBS (Indian <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> Society).<br />
7) The use <strong>of</strong> an ultrasound machine instead <strong>of</strong> CT scanner for imaging<br />
can substantially reduce the cost wherever CT Scanner installation is<br />
not cost effective.<br />
b) POLICIES<br />
Certain Government policies will be helpful in reducing the costs.<br />
a) Optimum use <strong>of</strong> space can be achieved by the use <strong>of</strong> Teletherapy<br />
room for <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> also.<br />
b) Life saving equipments like brachytherapy machines must be<br />
exempted from import duty.<br />
c) Accessories can be manufactured locally with guidance from<br />
Vendors instead <strong>of</strong> importing them.<br />
d) Cost to the patients can be subsidized through national insurance<br />
health policies and by participating philanthropists.<br />
e) Portable brachytherapy machines which can be moved between<br />
different centers will help in resource sharing.<br />
f) The life <strong>of</strong> the HDR source can be extended by using it as a PDR<br />
(Pulsed dose rate) and LDR (Low dose rate) source, after the activity<br />
comes down.<br />
g) <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> facility costing must be included upfront in the<br />
initial Radiotherapy oncology project planning.<br />
c) STRATEGIES<br />
The Government, vendors, private <strong>org</strong>anizations, NGO’s and medical<br />
schools can adopt important cost saving strategies.<br />
a) Networking <strong>of</strong> cancer centers can be done through HUB and spoke<br />
model.<br />
b) Equipment and sources can be procured by the government (3 tier<br />
model).<br />
c) Free standing brachytherapy facility in cities with a centralized<br />
treatment planning will be helpful in a resource sharing model.<br />
60<br />
NORTH AMERICA<br />
D. Beyer<br />
Arizona Oncology Services, Scottsdale, USA<br />
Abstract not received<br />
61<br />
AUSTRALIAN PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
J. Miller<br />
Alfred Health, Radiation Oncology, Melbourne, Australia<br />
Australia is 95% <strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> the continental USA, but has a<br />
population <strong>of</strong> 23,000,000. About twothirds <strong>of</strong> this population live in<br />
the eight capital cities <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the component Australian States or<br />
Territories. Australia has a higher GDP per capita than the United<br />
States. The health care system in Australia is a mixed private and<br />
public scheme: a Federal Governmentfunded insurance scheme<br />
(Medicare Benefits Scheme, or MBS) provides funding for universal<br />
cover delivered by a public hospital system overseen by each State <br />
or by subsidising care to patients in a private inpatient or ambulatory<br />
setting, independent <strong>of</strong> the individual Staterun "public hospitals". To<br />
supplement and support this Government system, about 45% <strong>of</strong><br />
Australians purchase private health insurance in a competitive<br />
market, allowing these people funded access to a private hospital and<br />
to a private health careprovider system.<br />
There are almost 20 000 cases a year <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer in Australia,<br />
and 3000 deaths. About 5000 men a year have low risk disease at<br />
diagnosis. Most treatment modalities are available for men with<br />
prostate cancer in Australia: active surveillance, radical<br />
prostatectomy (including robotassisted), external beam radiotherapy,<br />
both high and low doserate brachytherapy, hormonal and<br />
chemotherapy treatments. Proton treatment is not available; HIFU<br />
and cryotherapy are available but not common.<br />
In the period 7/20096/20<strong>10</strong> there were over 6000 prostatectomies in<br />
Australia, while there were about <strong>12</strong>00 I<strong>12</strong>5 seed implants.<br />
Transperineal TRUSguided permanent seed implants commenced in<br />
Australia in 1997, in Perth. No Governmentinsurance funding was<br />
available until the procedure was approved for men with NCCN low<br />
risk disease in 2001, after an expert panel review <strong>of</strong> the evidence for<br />
safety and efficacy. In 2006 a further similar review extended the<br />
allowable indications for seed brachytherapy to include men with GS 7<br />
disease. The growth in numbers and brachytherapy centres has been<br />
steady, to now include 15 centres nationally, in most states or<br />
territories. Only iodine<strong>12</strong>5 permanent seeds are easily available for<br />
clinical use in Australia; palladium and caesium are not used.<br />
The procedure is not, however, available free<strong>of</strong>charge to men in the<br />
public hospital system in all States, and is effectively rationed where<br />
it is available. The majority <strong>of</strong> men implanted in Australia are<br />
privatelyinsured patients, having procedures in private hospitals, and<br />
bearing significant out<strong>of</strong>pocket costs above the fixed MBS subsidy.<br />
The calculated cost to the MBS, other government agencies, and by<br />
either the patient or private insurer in Australia for treatment and<br />
<strong>10</strong> years followup is very similar in either the private or public<br />
sectors, and between modalities, ranging from AUS$ <strong>12</strong>,900 for EBRT<br />
(and no androgen deprivation), through AUS$ 13,<strong>10</strong>0 for a seed<br />
implant, to AUS$ 14,800 for a radical prostatectomy (nonrobot).<br />
There is, however, a major difference in the allocation <strong>of</strong> costs, with<br />
inpatient costs being the driver for RP, and the seed cost the driver<br />
for brachytherapy.<br />
Seed brachytherapy has become a standard <strong>of</strong> care treatment for men<br />
with lowrisk or "good" intermediaterisk disease in Australia, but is<br />
unevenly available for reasons that relate to history, economics, the<br />
regulatory arrangements <strong>of</strong> the Australian health care system,<br />
allocation <strong>of</strong> costs, and the number and distribution <strong>of</strong> prostate<br />
cancer specialists in the various disciplines.<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 25<br />
62<br />
EUROPE<br />
Y. Lievens<br />
University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium<br />
Abstract not received<br />
63<br />
SOUTH AMERICA<br />
M. de la Torre<br />
CeDeTe, Buenos Aires, Argentina<br />
Abstract not received<br />
64<br />
THE ROLE OF INDUSTRY IN DEVELOPING COSTEFFECTIVE<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
E. Rosenblatt 1<br />
1<br />
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency, Applied Radiation Biology<br />
and Radiotherapy Section, Vienna, Austria<br />
<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> has become increasingly popular and highly tied to<br />
technological development. The increasing popularity <strong>of</strong><br />
brachytherapy is a direct consequence <strong>of</strong> its effectiveness in the cure<br />
or palliation <strong>of</strong> various forms <strong>of</strong> cancer. But also, the increasing<br />
dependence <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy on complex technology, determines a<br />
corresponding increase in costs.<br />
Costeffectiveness analyses relate the additional cost to its<br />
incremental impact on any clinically relevant measure <strong>of</strong> benefit.<br />
Because one <strong>of</strong> the primary uses <strong>of</strong> economic analysis is to allocate<br />
limited resources among diverse interventions, benefit has to be<br />
measured in units that are universally applicable to all interventions.<br />
“Years<strong>of</strong>lifesaved” is the most commonly used measure. When<br />
calculating “costeffectiveness” then, only cost and survival must be<br />
measured. A treatment’s costeffectiveness ratio is calculated by<br />
dividing its incremental cost by its incremental impact on survival as<br />
compared to the most reasonable alternative treatment. The result <strong>of</strong><br />
this rate is then expressed in dollars per years<strong>of</strong>lifesaved.<br />
Interventions costing less than an additional U$ 50.000 per year<strong>of</strong><br />
lifesaved are considered “costeffective”.<br />
The industry has traditionally had a key role in the development <strong>of</strong><br />
brachytherapy as we know it today. The brachytherapy industry now<br />
mostly gravitates around two main lines <strong>of</strong> production; [1] high dose<br />
rate (HDR) remote afterloaders and accessories, and [2] prostate<br />
brachytherapy systems. Demand by patients and physicians for<br />
innovations to help cancer patients, drives investment in<br />
biotechnologies given the potential pr<strong>of</strong>its. From the industry<br />
perspective, pricing <strong>of</strong> new cancer innovations is influenced by<br />
development costs (including risk at each stage <strong>of</strong> development)<br />
production costs, potential market size, pricing <strong>of</strong> comparables, and<br />
ultimately the novelty and value <strong>of</strong> the new product in the<br />
marketplace.<br />
Innovation in the brachytherapy field has to pay close attention to a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> issues such as the international basic safety standards as<br />
well as standards <strong>of</strong> safety determined by the ICRP, source<br />
characterization protocols, IEC compliance and compliance with the<br />
requirements <strong>of</strong> specific national or regional regulatory bodies such as<br />
the FDA in the US and the EURATOM Directives in the EU.<br />
The introduction <strong>of</strong> HDR brachytherapy allowed treatments to be<br />
given in minutes rather than days, replace hospital admissions by<br />
ambulatory treatments and eliminate the need for spinal or general<br />
anaesthesia, in other words; more costeffective brachytherapy.<br />
Economic analysis have shown that in departments that treat more<br />
than 300 new cases <strong>of</strong> cervical cancer per year, the use <strong>of</strong> HDR<br />
brachytherapy is clearly costeffective as compared with LDR. The<br />
equivalence <strong>of</strong> HDR vs. LDR in terms <strong>of</strong> clinical outcomes and<br />
toxicities has already been established in levelI evidence studies<br />
carried out in developed as well as developing countries.<br />
The miniaturisation <strong>of</strong> Cobalt60 sources, making them the same size<br />
<strong>of</strong> previously used Ir192 sources, was a clear and significant step<br />
towards a more costeffective brachytherapy. Other strategies to be<br />
discussed are accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and<br />
electronic brachytherapy.<br />
One possible approach that has been promoted by the IAEA through<br />
the AGaRT (“Advisory Group for increasing access to Radiotherapy<br />
Technology”) process is encouraging the manufacturers to develop<br />
packages <strong>of</strong> equipment fully compatible and which are sold at<br />
accessible prices. A typical package may include for example: the<br />
afterloader, a number <strong>of</strong> sources, a BT treatment planning system<br />
with s<strong>of</strong>tware, connectors and applicators, an imaging device, a<br />
service maintenance contract and training. Manufacturers have<br />
responded positively to this challenge, and the process moves<br />
forward.<br />
To make brachytherapy more costeffective then, the industry must<br />
come up with either treatments strategies or techniques that are<br />
more effective, resourcesparing or both, while at the same time<br />
keeping the high standards <strong>of</strong> safety that are the norm today.<br />
<br />
OC65<br />
DEVELOPMENT OF A WATER CALORIMETER AS A PRIMARY STANDARD<br />
FOR ABSORBED DOSE TO WATER FOR HDR BRACHYTHERAPY SOURCES<br />
L.A. de Prez 1 , J.A. de Pooter 1<br />
1 VSL Ionizing Radiation Standards, Delft, The Netherlands<br />
: Currently, dosimetry for brachytherapy sources is<br />
based on airkerma standards. In the framework <strong>of</strong> the iMERAplus JRP<br />
6, VSL is developing a water calorimeter for high dose rate (HDR)<br />
brachytherapy sources to measure directly the absorbed dose to<br />
water, Dw. Water calorimetry for HDR sources differs from water<br />
calorimetry for external beams on two main aspects. Firstly, due to<br />
the selfheating <strong>of</strong> the source an undesired temperature rise appears.<br />
Secondly, the radiation induced temperature signal is very sensitive to<br />
small variations in the HDRsource to thermistor distance. Methods to<br />
reduce these effects were implemented in the design <strong>of</strong> the<br />
calorimeter.<br />
: The developed water calorimeter is based on<br />
the existing water calorimeter for external beams with a newly<br />
developed high purity cell (HPC, see figure). The HDR source is<br />
positioned centrally inside the HPC. A nylon catheter on the central<br />
axis <strong>of</strong> the HPC is used for positioning <strong>of</strong> the source. The HPC is<br />
cylindrically shaped with two opposing thermistors on each side <strong>of</strong> the<br />
catheter. The distance between the thermistors and the centre <strong>of</strong> the<br />
catheter is 2.0 cm. To decrease the uncertainty <strong>of</strong> the temperature<br />
signal as a result <strong>of</strong> variations in the distance between catheter and<br />
thermistors, the measured temperature increase is averaged over the<br />
two thermistors. A cylindrical aluminum heat sink in a concentric<br />
configuration with the HPC is used to reduce the influence <strong>of</strong> the<br />
source selfheat on the temperature signal. The heat sink is separated<br />
from the inside <strong>of</strong> the HPC by the central PEEK cylinder. Due to the<br />
enhanced heat transport in the longitudinal direction <strong>of</strong> the heat sink,<br />
less heat generated in the HDR source (selfheat) reaches the<br />
thermistors. Monte Carlo (PENELOPE) and heat transport simulations<br />
(Comsol Multiphysics TM ) were performed to determine the amount <strong>of</strong><br />
source selfheat and resulting excess temperature effects.<br />
: Measurements performed with a Nucletron microSelectron V2<br />
HDR source showed good agreement with the modeled excess<br />
temperature effects for an initial temperature <strong>of</strong> source and cable <strong>of</strong><br />
respectively 13 °C and 17 °C. The resulting measured and modeled<br />
calorimeter drifts are shown in the figure. Presently the relevant<br />
correction factors are being examined in order to determine the<br />
aborbed dose rate and its final uncertainty budget.<br />
: The model calculations for the HDR water calorimeter<br />
are in good agreement with measurements. After establishing suitable<br />
correction factors with their final uncertainty budget, the calorimeter<br />
can be used for absorbed dose measurements <strong>of</strong> HDR brachytherapy<br />
sources.
S26 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
OC66<br />
QC OF LOWENERGY PHOTON BT SOURCES: RECOMMENDATIONS OF<br />
THE NETHERLANDS COMMISSION ON RADIATION DOSIMETRY (NCS)<br />
A. Rijnders 1 , A. Aalbers 2 , M. De Brabandere 3 , C. Koedooder 4 , M.A.<br />
Moerland 5 , B. Schaeken 6 , B. Thissen 7 , A. van 't Riet 8 , S. Vynckier 9<br />
1<br />
Europe Hospitals Sint Elisabeth, Radiotherapy, Brussels, Belgium<br />
2<br />
Van Swinden Laboratorium, Dosimetry, Delft, The Netherlands<br />
3<br />
UZ Leuven, Radiotherapy, Leuven, Belgium<br />
4<br />
AMC Amsterdam, Radiotherapy, Amsterdam, The Netherlands<br />
5<br />
UMC Utrecht, Radiotherapy, Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />
6<br />
URA Antwerpen, Radiotherapy, Antwerpen, Belgium<br />
7<br />
CHU Liège, Radiotherapy, Liège, Belgium<br />
9<br />
UCLSt Luc, Radiotherapy, Woluwe, Belgium<br />
<br />
: In Belgium (BE) and The Netherlands (NL)<br />
permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPBT) using <strong>12</strong>5 I seeds is a widely<br />
used treatment modality. The strong increase in the number <strong>of</strong><br />
patients treated prompted the NCS board in 2004 to set up a working<br />
group in order to study the clinical and dosimetry aspects related to<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> lowenergy photon (LEP) sources and to publish guidelines<br />
and recommendations on QC with respect to this use.<br />
: The clinical practice regarding QC <strong>of</strong> LEP<br />
sources used in BT was studied by sending a questionnaire to all<br />
institutes in both countries. From this survey a large variability in the<br />
QC procedures applied was observed. In about 40% <strong>of</strong> the institutes<br />
the source strength <strong>of</strong> the LEP sources was not routinely verified.<br />
Table 1 gives an overview <strong>of</strong> the measurement equipment available in<br />
the institutions. Only 3 devices were calibrated at an ADCL, 4 other<br />
were calibrated by the manufacturer.<br />
Table 1: Measurement equipment in use in Be and Nl<br />
Be Nl Total<br />
None 5 1 6<br />
PTW SourceCheck 9 1 <strong>10</strong><br />
SI (HDR<strong>10</strong>00/IVB<strong>10</strong>00) 4 4 8<br />
NA 34070 3 3 6<br />
Capintec (CRC<strong>10</strong>/CRC15R) 2 1 3<br />
Veenstra VDC303 1 1<br />
Sun Nuclear <strong>10</strong>0840 1 1<br />
In a second step, onsite visits were performed in all participating<br />
institutes (31). The source strength for a limited number <strong>of</strong> seeds<br />
(typically 3) was measured by the NCS visit team and compared to the<br />
value stated on the source certificate and, if available, to the value<br />
determined by the local physicist.<br />
During the onsite visits the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the TPS used for PPBT was<br />
evaluated with 5 basic tests. The AAPM TG43 update and consensus<br />
data or otherwise published data on the source dosimetry parameters<br />
were used as reference. The tests revealed variations in dose<br />
calculation results due to incorrect application <strong>of</strong> the anisotropy<br />
model by the user and to the use <strong>of</strong> source data which were since<br />
2004 no longer recommended. Most TPSs underestimate the volumes<br />
in DVH calculations.<br />
These results have been presented earlier (Boston 2008).<br />
: The survey and onsite visits identified a need for guidelines<br />
on the QC <strong>of</strong> LEP BT sources. Taking into account the<br />
recommendations from other <strong>org</strong>anizations such as IAEA, ICRU, IPEM,<br />
ESTRO and AAPM, the subcommittee decided to adopt the latter and<br />
recommends to verify the source strength on a sample <strong>of</strong> sources prior<br />
to the implantation procedure. Dedicated instruments should be used,<br />
and these should be traceably calibrated at a 2 year interval.<br />
The ultrasound (US) machine grid and template alignment should be<br />
verified at a 3 months interval (tolerance 2 mm). The accuracy <strong>of</strong><br />
source position reconstruction by the TPS should be tested for all<br />
imaging modalities that are applied (accuracy < 2 mm). Dose<br />
calculation accuracy should be verified to be < ±2%.<br />
: The NCS subcommittee endorses the recommendations<br />
<strong>of</strong> the AAPM to perform a measurement on a sample <strong>of</strong> sources prior<br />
to the implantation procedure, using dedicated and traceably<br />
calibrated instruments.<br />
The subcommittee stresses the importance <strong>of</strong> using consensus data as<br />
input in the TPS and presents recommendations for the QC <strong>of</strong> this TPS<br />
and <strong>of</strong> the US system that is used for PPBT.<br />
OC67<br />
AAPM PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR COMS EYE PLAQUE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
S.T. ChiuTsao 1 , M.A. Astrahan 2 , P.T. Finger 3 , D.S. Followill 4 , A.S.<br />
Meigooni 5 , F. Mourtada 6 , M.E. Napolitano 7 , R. Nath 8 , M.J. Rivard and<br />
C.S. Melhus 9 , D.W.O. Rogers and R.M. Thomson <strong>10</strong><br />
1<br />
Quality MediPhys LLC, Physics, Denville NJ, USA<br />
2<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Southern California, Radiation Oncology, Los Angeles<br />
CA, USA<br />
3<br />
The New York Eye Cancer Center, Ophthalmology, New York NY, USA<br />
4<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Radiological<br />
Physics Center, Houston TX, USA<br />
5<br />
Comprehensive Cancer Center <strong>of</strong> Nevada, Radiation Oncology, Las<br />
Vegas NV, USA<br />
6<br />
Christiana Health Care System, Radiation Oncology, Newark DE, USA<br />
7<br />
Elekta Inc., Physics, Norcross GA, USA<br />
8<br />
Yale University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Therapeutic Radiology, New<br />
Haven CT, USA<br />
9<br />
Tufts University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Boston MA,<br />
USA<br />
<strong>10</strong><br />
Carleton University, Physics, Ottawa, Canada<br />
: A report has been prepared on quality practice<br />
recommendations for COMS eye plaque brachytherapy which have<br />
been endorsed by the ABS. The forthcoming report includes reference<br />
coordinates for seeds positioned in COMS plaques, fundus diagrams for<br />
eyes, a clinical literature review, and estimates <strong>of</strong> dose changes when<br />
heterogeneity corrections are made to the TG43 dose calculation<br />
formalism. A summary <strong>of</strong> the dosimetry and quality practice aspects is<br />
provided if a decision is made to adopt heterogeneity corrections.<br />
: A literature search was performed to<br />
evaluate dosimetry studies and clinical practices. A 2011 multi<br />
institutional COMS plaque dosimetry study was evaluated as a basis for<br />
practice recommendations and to estimate behavior <strong>of</strong> different<br />
treatment planning techniques with and without heterogeneity<br />
corrections.<br />
: The TG43 formalism does not account for material<br />
heterogeneities. A prescription dose <strong>of</strong> 85 Gy (based on homogeneous<br />
water assumption) at 5 mm depth actually delivers 76 Gy and 67 Gy<br />
for <strong>12</strong>5 I (model 6711) and <strong>10</strong>3 Pd (model 200) sources, respectively, after<br />
accounting for COMSplaque heterogeneities. Factor <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> dose<br />
changes occur between homogeneous and heterogeneous medium<br />
calculations for <strong>of</strong>faxis anatomic structures. The plaque treatment<br />
planning system and ultrasound unit should be commissioned<br />
preceding clinical use. The prescription should include a retinal<br />
diagram that indicates the affected eye, tumor location, tumor<br />
dimensions, and proximity to critical normal ocular structures. Doses<br />
to fovea, optic disc, lens, opposite eye wall, and sclera should be<br />
calculated. Seed strengths shall be verified prior to plaque assembly<br />
and loading patterns confirmed using autoradiography, photography,<br />
or visual inspection. The plaque placement should be verified<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 27<br />
intraoperatively. Intraoperative ultrasonographic imaging, scleral<br />
depression, and/or transillumination techniques are widely used to<br />
verify plaque placement accuracy for posterior tumors. Different dose<br />
calculation algorithms can result in significant dose differences which<br />
can complicate evaluations <strong>of</strong> radiation dose response and<br />
intercomparisons with other modalities.<br />
: Accurate dose calculations are the foundation upon<br />
which meaningful intercomparisons can be performed amongst<br />
different radiation modalities and for variations such as the use or<br />
nonuse <strong>of</strong> Silastic inserts, gold 'seedguides,' seed slots, notches,<br />
plaqueslots, and custom plaque designs. Thus, as more accurate<br />
methods for dose calculation become available, these methods should<br />
be adopted clinically even though it may require changes in<br />
prescription doses. Practice guidelines are also provided outlining<br />
specific tasks towards unifying the widespread practice <strong>of</strong> eye plaque<br />
brachytherapy. A joint AAPM/ABS/ESTRO Task Group has been<br />
established and will examine similar aspects that are specific to non<br />
COMS plaques.<br />
OC68<br />
DOSIMETRIC CHARACTERIZATION OF SURFACE APPLICATORS USED WITH<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY SOURCES<br />
R. Fulkerson 1 , J. Micka 1 , L. DeWerd 1<br />
1<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin School <strong>of</strong> Medicine and Public Health,<br />
Medical Physics, Madison, USA<br />
<br />
: This investigation was performed to develop a<br />
quantitative method <strong>of</strong> output verification for surface applicators<br />
used with HDR brachytherapy sources. Specifically applicators<br />
manufactured by Varian Medical Systems (Palo Alto, CA) for use with<br />
the VariSource TM iX and GammaMedplus iX HDR 192 Ir afterloader<br />
systems, as well as applicators manufactured by X<strong>of</strong>t Inc (an iCAD<br />
company) (Sunnyvale, CA) for use with the Axxent ® source. Current<br />
dosimetry protocols available from the AAPM cannot be applied<br />
directly for these kinds <strong>of</strong> surface applicators. The standard<br />
interstitial brachytherapy dosimetry protocol (TG43) was intended<br />
for treatments assuming full homogenous backscatter, with a<br />
reference point 1 cm from the perpendicular bisector <strong>of</strong> a<br />
cylindrically symmetric source. Another dosimetry protocol <strong>of</strong> interest<br />
(TG61) was developed to determine absorbed dose to water at a<br />
point <strong>of</strong> interest through airkerma rate measurements with a NIST<br />
traceable ionization chamber for lowenergy superficial xray beams.<br />
The geometric and scatter conditions <strong>of</strong> the Varian and X<strong>of</strong>t<br />
applicators do not fully meet the requirements described in either<br />
protocol, and this work aims to provide a transition within the<br />
underlying issue <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy sources being used as external<br />
beam sources.<br />
: Conical surface applicators with diameters<br />
ranging from 1 cm to 5 cm are available for the conformal treatment<br />
<strong>of</strong> superficial lesions. To ensure the correct dose is delivered to the<br />
patient, the output <strong>of</strong> each applicator must be characterized and<br />
calibrated using a NISTtraceable dosimetric standard. Airkerma rate<br />
measurements for each applicator were performed using a variety <strong>of</strong><br />
ionization chambers. To obtain a dose to water from the airkerma<br />
rate measurements, a number <strong>of</strong> correction factors were applied<br />
including Monte Carlo determined backscatter factors (Bw) and<br />
chamber stem correction factors (Pstem). Additional measurements <strong>of</strong><br />
the relative surface dose distributions and depth dose curves in water<br />
were determined for all applicators and compared to the Monte Carlo<br />
calculated values.<br />
: Measured airkerma rates for the Varisource iX are shown in<br />
Table 1, decay corrected to a reference date. Measurements for all<br />
applicators agreed to within 5%. Measured and calculated depth dose<br />
curves for the Varisource iX and GammaMed iX agreed to within 3% for<br />
all applicators. Similar results were observed for the Axxent surface<br />
applicators.<br />
: This work will create a surface applicator specific<br />
dosimetry protocol based on airkerma rate measurements with a<br />
NISTtraceable small volume parallelplate chamber. Through<br />
measured and calculated chamber correction factors and relative dose<br />
distribution information, users will have a clinically relevant<br />
methodology for output verification, minimizing the uncertainty<br />
associated with patient dose delivery.<br />
OC69<br />
BRINGING INVIVO FIBERCOUPLED BRACHYTHERAPY DOSIMETRY TO<br />
THE PATIENT<br />
G. Kertzscher 1 , C.E. Andersen 1 , J.C. Lindegaard 2 , L.U. Fokdal 2 , M.<br />
Paludan 2 , S.K. Nielsen 3 , K. Tanderup 4<br />
1<br />
Technical University <strong>of</strong> Denmark, Center for Nuclear Technologies,<br />
Roskilde, Denmark<br />
2<br />
Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Aarhus,<br />
Denmark<br />
3<br />
Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics, Aarhus,<br />
Denmark<br />
4<br />
Aarhus University, Institute <strong>of</strong> Clinical Medicine, Aarhus, Denmark<br />
: The clinical use <strong>of</strong> invivo brachytherapy (BT)<br />
dosimetry is limited partly by operative complexities and<br />
measurement and detector positioning uncertainties. These<br />
limitations compromise the detection <strong>of</strong> BT treatment errors. Fiber<br />
coupled dosimetry systems have demonstrated capacity for accurate<br />
realtime BT dosimetry. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to develop<br />
tools and methods that increase possibilities to perform routine and<br />
precise fibercoupled BT dosimetry in the clinic.<br />
: Invivo fibercoupled Al2O3:C dosimetry was<br />
performed during four pulsed dose rate (PDR) BT treatments <strong>of</strong> locally<br />
advanced cervical cancer. Each patient underwent 20 hours <strong>of</strong><br />
intracavitary PDR BT using tandemring applicators ± interstitial<br />
needles. Tools developed for improved probe placement stability,<br />
minimal calibration time, and insignificant optical interference were<br />
evaluated. A procedure to light seal the fibercable using black<br />
polyethylene terephthalate heatshrink tubing was developed. The<br />
dosimeter probe was placed inside a catheter which was fastened to<br />
the tandem applicator (see Figure). Reference dose rates were<br />
calculated according to the TG43 protocol using MR reconstructed<br />
dosimeter probe and source dwell positions. Measured dose rate<br />
discrepancies with respect to the first BT pulse were obtained for<br />
each tandem applicator dwell position during the treatments.<br />
Dosimeter position shifts were deduced by minimizing the difference<br />
between measured and numerically simulated dose rate<br />
discrepancies.<br />
: Measured dose rate discrepancies during treatments 1, 3, and<br />
4 corresponded to a 1.5 mm maximum dosimeter position shift with<br />
respect to the position during the initial treatment pulse (see Figure).<br />
As an example, in one treatment pulse, a 2.5 % (1.5 %) dose rate<br />
discrepancy at the 52 mm (13 mm) sourcetodetector distance,<br />
corresponded to a 0.4 mm (0.2 mm) position shift in the longitudinal<br />
dosimeter probe direction. The 4 mm position shifts observed during<br />
the second treatment, were ascribed to a poor probe connection. The<br />
dry calibration procedure took less than 15 min, including the time<br />
required to setup the afterloader, powering the computer, etc. Heat<br />
shrink tubing kept the outer diameter <strong>of</strong> the dosimeter smaller than<br />
1.1 mm, and reduced the light interference by two orders <strong>of</strong><br />
magnitude to the readout electronics background level.
S28 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
: Utilities necessary to facilitate routinebased and time<br />
efficient invivo BT dosimetry is presented. The measured 1.5 mm<br />
probe position stability provides a crucial dose rate uncertainty<br />
component during both PDR and HDR BT dosimetry. The thin and light<br />
tight dosimeter probe allows for both easy probe insertion and sub<br />
mm stability measurements.<br />
OC70<br />
A REVOLUTIONARY MULTIPOINT PLASTIC SCINTILLATION DETECTOR<br />
FOR IN VIVO DOSIMETRY IN HDR BRACHYTHERAPY.<br />
F. TherriaultProulx 1 , L. Archambault 2 , S. Beddar 1 , L. Beaulieu 2<br />
1<br />
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Physics,<br />
Houston, USA<br />
2<br />
HotelDieu de Quebec, Departement de RadioOncologie, Quebec,<br />
Canada<br />
: There is a growing interest for in vivo dosimeters<br />
in high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR). If plastic scintillation<br />
detectors (PSDs) have been shown to possess advantageous<br />
characteristics, they require a coupling to an optical guide for each<br />
point <strong>of</strong> measurement. In brachytherapy the space for dosimeter<br />
insertion is <strong>of</strong>ten limited (e.g. in catheters). The necessity <strong>of</strong> an<br />
optical guide for each scintillating element then <strong>of</strong>ten limits the<br />
measurement to a single point per region <strong>of</strong> interest. The purpose <strong>of</strong><br />
our study is to develop a PSD capable <strong>of</strong> measuring dose at multiple<br />
points along a same optical transmission line for Ir192 HDR/PDR<br />
brachytherapy and to demonstrate additional potential applications<br />
for such a detector.<br />
: A multipoint PSD composed <strong>of</strong> three<br />
different scintillating elements (2 mm long x 1 mm diameter, 25 mm<br />
apart) and a single collection plastic optical fiber (20 m long x 1 mm<br />
diameter) was built, as depicted in figure 1. Optical spectra (Spec.)<br />
were acquired at the output <strong>of</strong> the collection optical fiber. The<br />
emission spectra from the scintillating elements were obtained using a<br />
well collimated xray source. The light spectrum <strong>of</strong> the stem effect<br />
generated in the clear optical fiber was obtained through irradiation<br />
using the Ir192 HDR brachytherapy source. A novel approach allowed<br />
us to calculate the individual contribution (CX) <strong>of</strong> each lightemitting<br />
component (see equation 1). The dose to a specific scintillating<br />
element can be calculated from equation 2 by using at least one<br />
knowndose condition to this element.<br />
: Dose measurements were performed with the multipoint<br />
detector placed at radial distances (r) <strong>of</strong> 1.0 cm and 2.0 cm from the<br />
source inside a polystyrene phantom and compared to data from the<br />
treatment planning system (TPS). Figure 1 shows the dose integrated<br />
by the detector by each scintillating element for each source positions<br />
along the z axis together with the expected dose as calculated by the<br />
TPS. There is a (4.6±1.0)% average difference between the measured<br />
dose and the dose from the TPS for individual dwell positions. The<br />
summation <strong>of</strong> measurements for all dwell positions differs from the<br />
dose calculated across the entire catheter by only (2.1±1.0)%. On top<br />
<strong>of</strong> their use for simultaneous multipoint dosimetry, we showed that<br />
the scintillating elements were capable <strong>of</strong> determining the source<br />
position along the zaxis with a (0.8±0.2) mm accuracy.<br />
: This study shows for the first time it is possible to<br />
measure accurately dose at multiple positions in HDR brachytherapy<br />
using a waterequivalent detector with a single line <strong>of</strong> signal<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 29<br />
transmission. This will be useful for spatially constrained applications<br />
and will decrease the need for additional catheter implants. Together<br />
with its capacity to determine accurately the source position in space<br />
and all the other advantages known to PSDs, the multipoint PSD has a<br />
bright future and should lead to the development <strong>of</strong> various<br />
applications in HDR/PDR brachytherapy for both in vivo dosimetry and<br />
pretreatment quality assurance.<br />
<br />
OC71<br />
SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS (SNP'S) ASSOCIATED WITH LATE<br />
RADIATION TOXICITY AFTER PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
N. Leong 1 , M. Parliament 1 , K. Martell 2 , S. Ghosh 3 , N. Pervez 1 , J.<br />
Pedersen 1 , D. Yee 1 , A. Murtha 1 , J. Amanie 1 , N. Usmani 1<br />
1 Cross Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, Edmonton, Canada<br />
2 University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Edmonton, Canada<br />
3 University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Oncology, Edmonton, Canada<br />
: Excessive toxicity from prostate brachytherapy<br />
treatment may be related to increased radiosensitivity from genetic<br />
polymorphisms. This study was designed to identify particular single<br />
nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP's) that were associated with high<br />
toxicity after therapy in order to determine possible markers for<br />
increased radiation sensitivity<br />
: 349 patients treated with prostate<br />
brachytherapy at the Cross Cancer Institute between 1998 and 20<strong>10</strong><br />
provided saliva samples from which DNA was extracted for this<br />
research ethics board approved study. In the cohort <strong>of</strong> patients with<br />
at least 2 years <strong>of</strong> followup, 41 patients were identified as having<br />
high late toxicity (≥ RTOG grade 2 GI or GU toxicity), and 1<strong>10</strong> patients<br />
were identified as controls without high late toxicity. We analyzed 15<br />
SNP's from 13 genes (MSH6, GSTA1, SOD2, NOS3, GSTP1, ATM, LIG4,<br />
XRCC1, XRCC3, RAD51, TP53, TGFβ1, ERCC2) for correlation with<br />
increased late toxicity. Patient factors and dosimetric parameters<br />
were also collected for the analysis.<br />
: All 15 proposed SNP's demonstrated polymorphism within the<br />
study population. We implemented a univariate analysis, with<br />
Bonferroni correction, to examine the correlation between variant<br />
allele SNP's (versus wild type) and the presence <strong>of</strong> increased toxicity.<br />
This revealed a statistically significant relationship in 3 <strong>of</strong> the SNP's<br />
(p
S30 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
urethral dose to 0.1 cm 3 , 1 cm 3 , and 2 cm 3 was on average 76.2 Gy<br />
(range: 49.4 – 111.2 Gy), 48.9 Gy (range: 43.2 – 68.1 Gy) and 46.1 Gy<br />
(range: 43.2 – 51.8 Gy) respectively. 2 <strong>of</strong> the 6 patients who had<br />
urethral involvement developed urethral necrosis after HDRBT. The<br />
D90 for these 2 patients was 76.8 Gy (range: 70.7 – 83.0 Gy). The<br />
average urethral dose to 0.1 cm 3 , 1 cm 3 , and 2 cm 3 for these patients<br />
was 95.1, 45.8, and 45.8 Gy respectively. Those that developed<br />
severe urethral toxicity had a trend to higher mean equivalent dose to<br />
the urethra (95.1 Gy vs. 73.4 Gy, p=0.1) and significantly higher dose<br />
per fraction <strong>of</strong> HDRBT to 0.1 cm 3 volume <strong>of</strong> the urethra (5.7 Gy vs.<br />
3.7 Gy, p=0.02) when compared to those who did not develop severe<br />
urethral toxicity.<br />
: This is the first study to assess urethral dosimetry for<br />
patients treated with HDR interstitial brachytherapy. The feasibility <strong>of</strong><br />
contouring the urethra as a critical structure and monitoring its dose<br />
is demonstrated. Patients who received over 5 Gy/fraction to 0.1 cm 3<br />
<strong>of</strong> urethra (approximate equivalent dose <strong>of</strong> 85 Gy) are at significantly<br />
increased risk <strong>of</strong> severe urethral toxicity. Since the total urethral<br />
volume was small, the point dose appears <strong>of</strong> greater clinical<br />
importance. Thus while sometimes high doses are necessary to<br />
adequately treat tumor with urethral involvement, the dose to the<br />
urethra should be monitored and reduced to decrease the likelihood<br />
<strong>of</strong> morbidity.<br />
OC74<br />
DOES PARTIAL BREAST BRACHYTHERAPY DECREASES SCATTERED FETAL<br />
DOSE IN PREGNANT WOMEN?<br />
A. Youssef 1 , T. LaCouture 1 , N. Pahlajani 1 , L. Hughes 1 , Y. Chen 1 , L. An 1 ,<br />
P. Potrebko 1 , N. Kramer 1 , S. Asbell 1<br />
1 Cooper University Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Camden, USA<br />
: More than 4000 pregnant women per year would<br />
need radiation therapy during pregnancy. Many studies had been<br />
made on calculation and measurement <strong>of</strong> the fetal dose from breast<br />
radiotherapy for pregnant women. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is to<br />
investigate if the fetal dose can be lowered using Partial Breast<br />
<strong>Brachytherapy</strong>.<br />
: The scattered dose to the anterior abdominal<br />
wall <strong>of</strong> 4 patients treated with Partial Breast <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> (PBB)<br />
treatments were recorded using film badges placed at anterior<br />
abdominal wall around the umbilicus. PBB used SAVI devices, two<br />
cases used SAVI size (61), one case used SAVI size (81) and one used<br />
SAVI size (<strong>10</strong>1). The dose was measured during 5 out <strong>of</strong> the <strong>10</strong><br />
treatments given. The dose per treatment was 340 cGy to 1 cm<br />
around the lumpectomy cavity. One cm bolus was added on top <strong>of</strong> the<br />
film badges. No shielding was attempted. The scattered dose was also<br />
measured the same way for 2 patients treated with IMRT to the whole<br />
breast. The dose prescribed was 180 cGy per fraction using inverse<br />
and forward IMRT. Again no shielding was attempted. The film badges<br />
were placed at the anterior abdominal wall with one cm bolus on top.<br />
The doses were recorded for only five treatments.<br />
: The measured dose was analyzed and multiplied by 2 for PBB<br />
(to get a total dose <strong>of</strong> 34 Gy), and by 5 for whole breast IMRT (to<br />
calculate for a total dose <strong>of</strong> 45 Gy to the whole breast in 25<br />
fractions). The following table simplifies the results<br />
Treatment<br />
type<br />
Calculated total<br />
treatment dose<br />
Patient height in<br />
inches<br />
Case #1 SAVI (61) 9.754 cGy 61<br />
Case #2 SAVI (61) 3.65 cGy 68<br />
Case #3 SAVI (81) 8.528 cGy 63<br />
Case #4 SAVI (<strong>10</strong>1) 14.878 cGy 60<br />
Case #5 IMRT<br />
forward<br />
28.305 cGy 62<br />
Case #6 IMRT<br />
inverse<br />
20.815 cGy 67<br />
Our data showed that PBB treatment lowered the dose scattered to<br />
the fetus during pregnancy. The average dose for PBB was 9.2 cGy vs.<br />
24.5 cGy for IMRT. The dose <strong>of</strong> PBB was directly related to the size <strong>of</strong><br />
the SAVI and inversely proportional to the distance between the<br />
device and the point <strong>of</strong> measurement on the anterior abdominal wall.<br />
: Although our data does not show that PBB is safe to<br />
treat pregnant women, we believe that PBB contributes with fewer<br />
doses to the fetus during pregnancy and further investigation should<br />
show that PBB can be used safely if special techniques are used to<br />
limit fetal dose.<br />
OC75<br />
CTGUIDED INTERSTITIAL IODINE<strong>12</strong>5 SEED IMPLANTATION IN THE<br />
TREATMENT OF SPINAL AND PARASPINAL MALIGNANCIES<br />
C. Liu 1 , H.S. Yuan 1 , J.J. Wang 2 , N. Meng 2 , Y.Q. Ma 1 , S.B. Han 1 , C.N.<br />
Pang 1<br />
1<br />
Peking University Third Hospital, Radiology, Beijing, China<br />
2<br />
Peking University Third Hospital, Oncology, Beijing, China<br />
<br />
: To investigate the clinical benefits <strong>of</strong> CTguided<br />
interstitial iodine<strong>12</strong>5 seed implantation in the treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
metastatic or primary spinal and paraspinal tumors.<br />
: 38 patients (with 43 lesions) <strong>of</strong> metastatic or<br />
primary spinal and paraspinal tumors, with no surgery or external<br />
beam radiotherapy opportunity, were underwent implantation<br />
procedure. Treatment planning system (TPS) was used to formulate<br />
the seeds distribution and assess radiation dosimetry preoperation and<br />
to obtain quality evaluation postoperation. Needles placement under<br />
CTguidance were performed according to TPS. The mean minimal<br />
peripheral doses <strong>of</strong> implantation was <strong>12</strong>0Gy (ranged from 90140Gy).<br />
The mean number <strong>of</strong> seeds was 79.3 (ranged from <strong>10</strong>224), The mean<br />
specific activity per seed was mCi 0.7 (ranged from 0.500.80 mCi).<br />
Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Ambulatory function score (AFS) was<br />
used to evaluate pain relief and limb function.<br />
<br />
: All patients tolerated the procedures well. No complications<br />
occurred. The mean followup was 15.3 months (ranged from 1 to 96<br />
months). The local control rate was 76.3% (29/38). The mean local<br />
control time and survival time was 14.2 months and 15.3 months. The<br />
1, 2, 3, and 5year local controls were 79.5%, 72.2%, 72.2% and<br />
72.2%, respectively. The 1, 2, 3, and 5year survival rates were<br />
62.4%, 35.8%, 21.5% and 14.3%, respectively. The mean VAS pre and<br />
postoperation was 8.08±2.<strong>12</strong> and 3.96±2.00, respectively (P
S32 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
: The obtained results show that the proposed detector is<br />
suitable for in vivo realtime dosimetry in high dose rate<br />
brachytherapy. Further studies are currently in progress for the<br />
application <strong>of</strong> this dosimeter in urethral dose measurements during<br />
interstitial brachytherapy treatments <strong>of</strong> the prostate.<br />
<br />
<br />
79<br />
PERMANENT PERINEAL IMPLANT (PPI) SALVAGE OF PPI FAILURES: IS<br />
LESS MORE IN HIGHLY SELECTED PATIENTS<br />
M. Roach<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA<br />
Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA,<br />
USA<br />
It has been estimated that 15 to 75% <strong>of</strong> men treated with radiotherapy<br />
(RT) will fail biochemically (Agarwal et al, Cancer 2008; <strong>12</strong>30714).<br />
Specifically given the outcomes <strong>of</strong> series reported by experienced<br />
Practitioners upwards <strong>of</strong> 30% <strong>of</strong> men undergoing permanent perineal<br />
implants (PPI) for prostate cancer fail within <strong>10</strong> years. Thus it is likely<br />
that failure rates are higher in the community where less experienced<br />
physicians. Based on a “back <strong>of</strong> the envelope” calculation I would<br />
estimate that it is likely that well over <strong>10</strong>0,000 men who have<br />
undergone are experiencing a rising PSA after PPI in the USA alone.<br />
Among the men with rising PSAs post PPI some are failing distantly<br />
and some locally. Given the typical selection criteria and the<br />
likelihood <strong>of</strong> poor quality implants in the community performed by<br />
low volume practitioners it seem probable that at least as many <strong>of</strong><br />
these recurrences are local as occurs after a radical prostatectomy<br />
(RP). Since the vast majority <strong>of</strong> men undergoing salvage external<br />
beam radiation (EBRT) after RP respond, it is also likely that a<br />
relatively large number <strong>of</strong> men failing PPIs might benefit from<br />
additional local treatment.<br />
Currently nearly 95% <strong>of</strong> men failing any form <strong>of</strong> RT are managed with<br />
androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (Agarwal et al, Cancer 2008; <strong>12</strong><br />
30714). Unfortunately this is not a curative intervention and it is<br />
associated with a host <strong>of</strong> side effects. Previous series have<br />
documented suboptimal control rates and significant morbidity when<br />
PPI salvage has been attempted (Moman et al. <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 9: 119<br />
25, 20<strong>10</strong>, Nguyen et al. Cancer 1<strong>10</strong>:1485 92, 2007 and Nguyen et al.<br />
<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 8:34552, 2009). However these series tended to treat<br />
the entire gland to near full doses. Of note however, most clinically<br />
significant local recurrences after RT appear to occur at the initial<br />
site <strong>of</strong> the primary tumor (Pucar et al. IJROBP 69: 629, 2007). Thus<br />
subsets <strong>of</strong> patients who are failing locally can be identified who might<br />
be candidates for local therapy.<br />
At UCSF we assessed feasibility <strong>of</strong> MRplanned focal partial prostate<br />
salvage PPI (psPPI). Our hypothesis going into this intervention was<br />
based on several principles:<br />
If the seeds were not distributed as planned but they were placed into<br />
the prostate then we did not have to worry about cold spots<br />
elsewhere and there was not need to retreat previously treated areas.<br />
Patients who had limited disease to start out with who appeared to<br />
have recurred in sites <strong>of</strong> previous disease where ideally suited for<br />
psPPI.<br />
An otherwise negative multiparametric MRI, supported by a care set<br />
<strong>of</strong> biopsies combined with #2 above set the criteria for the ideal<br />
patient for psPPI.<br />
Most importantly, develop a strategy that maximized the chances that<br />
our treatment would “at least do no harm”. To this end composite<br />
plans combining the previous dose distribution and “salvage plan” had<br />
to be “safe”.<br />
The potential types <strong>of</strong> patients who might be considered for salvage<br />
local therapies are shown diagrammatically in Figure 1. The typical<br />
patients we at UCSF selected for psPPI belong to categories 3 and 4 as<br />
shown in Figure 1 below.<br />
From 20032009, fifteen patients without metastases underwent<br />
MRI/MRS to identify coincident areas <strong>of</strong> recurrence following iPPI<br />
(N=14 I <strong>12</strong>5, 144Gy, N=1 Pd<strong>10</strong>3, <strong>12</strong>5Gy) underdosage in preparation<br />
for possible psPPI (without hormone therapy). For the psPPI planning<br />
the mean D90 CTV (focal recurrent disease) was set at 142Gy resulting<br />
in a whole prostate gland doses <strong>of</strong> 37Gy and a mean V<strong>10</strong>0 rectum <strong>of</strong><br />
0.5% (0.07cc) and urethra dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>% (0.3cc).<br />
Although the followup definition following psPPI for PSA failure was<br />
chosen as the Phoenix Definition (PSAF = nadir + 2.0) or the first<br />
ASTRO definition (ASTROPSAF = three consecutive rises) we expected<br />
substantially lower values to be reflective <strong>of</strong> success. Toxicity was<br />
scored using CTCAE v4.0.<br />
At psPPI the median age was 68, and the median PSA=3.5ng/mL<br />
(range:0.9 5.6 ng/mL). Most patients (71%) had Gleason Score 6 or<br />
less but 39% had Gleason Scores <strong>of</strong> ≥7. Only 40% had abnormal MRI/S<br />
with one (80%) or two (20%) abnormal foci. The median interval<br />
between iPPI and psPPI was 69mos (range 28132).<br />
At median followup <strong>of</strong> 23.3mos (range 888), two patients (13%)<br />
failed biochemically at 26 and 35mos however both underwent a<br />
second psPPI with followup PSA at 11.7 and 26.4 mos <strong>of</strong> 0.6 and<br />
0.7ng/mL, respectively. Counting these two patients as failure the<br />
ASTROPFS at 1, 2 and 3 years was 86.7%, 78.4%, and 62.7% with 5<br />
failures (N=3 with negative TRUSbiopsy). In contrast, the PhoenixPFS<br />
at 1, 2, and 3years were <strong>10</strong>0%, <strong>10</strong>0%, and 71.4%. psPPI PSA<br />
nadir <strong>12</strong> months is associated<br />
with a low risk <strong>of</strong> systemic progression and 92% remain metastasis<br />
free at 5 years.<br />
Surgical technique<br />
Nowadays with most patients undergoing EBRT, perineal low or high<br />
dose brachytherapy the standard retropubic approach is preferred for<br />
salvage RPE. Depending on the type <strong>of</strong> radiation technique there are<br />
different anatomical areas in which the surgical procedure might be<br />
complicated (table 1) and deserves specific experience.<br />
Complications: Rectal injury has been described in 6% to 19% <strong>of</strong><br />
patients in former series whereas it is reported in only 25% <strong>of</strong><br />
patients in modern series.<br />
Anastomotic strictures occur more frequently in 832%<br />
The incidence if urinary stress incontinence is higher than in series <strong>of</strong><br />
primary RPE. Complete continence can be achieved in about 50%,<br />
another 20% to 30% require only 1 pad per day. The radiation<br />
technique used appears to be associated with the frequency <strong>of</strong><br />
incontinence: in the author’s experience a high continence rate <strong>of</strong><br />
90% could be achieved in patients having undergone LDR<br />
brachytherapy.<br />
Cancer control following SRP<br />
The 5year progressionfree rates have improved and the results are<br />
similar to those <strong>of</strong> standard RPE in cases <strong>of</strong> similar pathological<br />
stages. The <strong>10</strong>year cancer specific and overall survival rates are in<br />
the range <strong>of</strong> 70% to 75% and 60% to 66% in contemporary series. In<br />
most contemporary series, <strong>org</strong>anconfined disease, negative surgical<br />
margins and the absence <strong>of</strong> seminal vesicle and/or lymph node<br />
metastases are favourable prognosticators associated with a better<br />
diseasefree survival <strong>of</strong> approximately 7080%.<br />
: With the advantage <strong>of</strong> PSA screening at regular followup<br />
intervalls following RT, most local failures will be detected by an<br />
asymptomatic PSA increase. Patients with PSA levels < <strong>10</strong> ng/ml, no<br />
palpable disease, negative findings on CT and bone scans are most<br />
suitable candidates for SRP. Contemporary series <strong>of</strong> SRP demonstrate<br />
excellent local control, good longterm cancer specific survival rates,<br />
minimal complication rates and a good health related quality <strong>of</strong> life.<br />
SRP represents the therapeutic option if choice in well selected<br />
patients with locally recurrent PCA preventing significant local<br />
complications. Based on our most recent findings on 117 patients SRP<br />
should only be performed at tertiary referral centres with an<br />
extensive experience not only in radical prostatectomy but especially<br />
in salvage surgery.<br />
<br />
OC81<br />
A MULTICENTRE COMPARISON OF INTER AND INTRAFRACTIONAL<br />
ORGAN MOVEMENT IN CERVIX CANCER BT AND ITS DOSIMETRIC IMPACT<br />
N. Nesvacil 1 , K. Tanderup 2 , T. PaulsenHellebust 3 , A. De Leeuw 4 ,<br />
C. Anderson 5 , S. Mohamed 2 , R. Pötter 6 , C. Kirisits 6<br />
1<br />
Medical University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy and<br />
Oncology Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria<br />
2<br />
Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Aarhus,<br />
Denmark<br />
3<br />
Oslo University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics Division <strong>of</strong><br />
Cancer and Surgery, Oslo, Norway<br />
4<br />
University Medical Center Utrecht, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />
Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />
5<br />
Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Clinical Physics Department,<br />
Northwood Middlesex, United Kingdom<br />
6<br />
Medical University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy and<br />
Oncology Comprehensive Cancer Center & Christian Doppler<br />
Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology,<br />
Vienna, Austria<br />
: Inter and intrafractional <strong>org</strong>an motion plays an<br />
important role in multifractional brachytherapy treatment when one<br />
dose plan is used for multiple fractions, or when <strong>org</strong>an movement<br />
happens in between imaging and dose delivery. The dosimetric impact<br />
<strong>of</strong> such motions has been reported previously in singleinstitutional<br />
studies.<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to compare the dosimetric impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>org</strong>an<br />
position variations by a retrospective multicentre analysis with<br />
different application techniques and fractionation schemes.<br />
: Data from 5 centers in the GYNGEC ESTRO<br />
Network using intracavitary (tandem/ovoid or tandem/ring)<br />
applicators +/ interstitial needles were collected.<br />
To assess dosimetric effects <strong>of</strong> the motion <strong>of</strong> critical <strong>org</strong>ans (bladder,<br />
rectum, sigmoid) between treatment fractions, multiple image scans<br />
(MRI or CT) were analysed. OAR were contoured on images at the time<br />
<strong>of</strong> BT planning as well as on a subsequent image series acquired prior<br />
to treatment <strong>of</strong> a subsequent HDR or PDR fraction. Dose plans<br />
generated by using the 1 st image series were superimposed onto the<br />
subsequent image sets and DVH parameters were calculated.<br />
DVH data for a total <strong>of</strong> 96 patients was available (323 image/contour<br />
sets, 254 MRI, 69 CT). DVH data for 16 fractions were available for<br />
each patient. The average time between consecutive image<br />
acquisitions varied between centers, from several hours to several<br />
days (mean 73 h, median 22 h, range 5 h – 22 d).<br />
: For each patient, D2cc for bladder, rectum and sigmoid were<br />
calculated based on images and contour sets acquired at different<br />
times during the BT treatment (at time <strong>of</strong> planning (D2cc_1) + at time
S34 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> subsequent imaging (D2cc_2)), using one dose plan for both image<br />
acquisitions. Data on sigmoid was only reported in 3 centers.<br />
In order to compare DVH parameters from treatment plans based on<br />
different fractionations and dose prescription, the relative changes in<br />
D2cc (physical dose) between two subsequent imaging acquisitions,<br />
(D2cc_2D2cc1)/D2cc_1, were computed.<br />
The median, average +/ standard deviation <strong>of</strong> the relative D2cc<br />
variations were 0.2%, 2.3+/21.7 % for bladder, 3.3%, 7.2+/24% for<br />
rectum, and 2.1%, 2.3+/26.1% for sigmoid.<br />
The data showed no statistically significant increase <strong>of</strong> the variation<br />
with increasing time between two image acquisitions, even not for<br />
those cases where the applicators had been removed and reinserted<br />
between two fractions.<br />
: Although in clinical routine sigmoid is observed to be the<br />
most mobile OAR in cervix cancer BT, the dosimetric effect to the<br />
recorded DVH parameters is comparable to the results for rectum and<br />
bladder. Other influencing factors, which were not recorded in these<br />
retrospective data, remain unclear. In particular, contouring<br />
uncertainties may be a significant contributor to the evaluated<br />
uncertainties. Proposals for standardized data collection and/or<br />
prospective study protocols are currently being developed.<br />
OC82<br />
PREPLANNING IMPROVES FEASIBILITY OF INTRACAVITARY/INTERSTITIEL<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY IN CERVICAL CANCER.<br />
L. Fokdal 1 , K. Tanderup 2 , S.B. Hokland 2 , L. Røhl 3 , E.M. Pedersen 3 , S.K.<br />
Nielsen 2 , J.C. Lindegaard 1<br />
1<br />
Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Aarhus,<br />
Denmark<br />
2<br />
Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics, Aarhus,<br />
Denmark<br />
3<br />
Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology, Aarhus,<br />
Denmark<br />
: Combined intracavitary/interstitial (IC/IS)<br />
brachytherapy (BT) techniques are increasingly being used for<br />
treatment <strong>of</strong> locally advanced cervical cancer. The aim was to<br />
investigate clinical feasibility and dosimetric gain <strong>of</strong> combined IC/IS<br />
pulsed dose rate BT for locally advanced cervical cancer based on full<br />
3D MRI preplanning with a tandem/ring IC applicator in situ.<br />
: Twentyfour consecutive patients (pts)<br />
included in the EMBRACE study from our institution were analysed. All<br />
pts had large volume cervical cancer and were treated with 2 IC/IS BT<br />
fractions (BT1 and BT2) combined with radiochemotherapy (4550<br />
Gy/2530 fx and weekly cisplatin). Overall treatment time was 7<br />
weeks with BT1 and BT2 delivered in week 6 and 7. A preplanning<br />
procedure with US guided insertion <strong>of</strong> a tandem/ring applicator in<br />
general anaesthesia and MRI was performed in week 5 (BT0).<br />
Optimised preplans were generated <strong>of</strong>f line for both IC and IC/IS<br />
including predefined virtual needle insertion points and implant depth<br />
through the ring as well as free needles. The IC/IS preplan was used<br />
as template for the actual IC/IS implants. MRI was repeated at BT1<br />
and BT2 and the dosimetric gains associated with the IC/IS implants<br />
were investigated and compared to IC BT0. Geometric reproducibility<br />
<strong>of</strong> the virtual needles from preplan to the actual implanted needles,<br />
time consumption, and assessment <strong>of</strong> acute toxicity and early<br />
morbidity (CTC v.3.0) were investigated.<br />
: Time in general anaesthesia for IC/IS implantation at BT1 and<br />
BT2 was 1530 min longer compared to the IC implant at BT0 (p
S36 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
: While overall changes in D2cc for R, B, and S are small,<br />
a clinically relevant increase in R and B was observed in some cases.<br />
The effect is likely due to changes in <strong>org</strong>an filling. An overall decrease<br />
in S D2cc was observed and was likely due to an overall catheter shift<br />
in the caudal direction. Further investigation on a larger patient<br />
sample will be conducted to validate our conclusions and to asses the<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> possible cranial catheter shifts on S D2cc.<br />
<br />
OC87<br />
BREASTCONSERVING THERAPY WITH PARTIAL OR WHOLE BREAST RT:<br />
<strong>10</strong>YEAR RESULTS OF THE BUDAPEST RANDOMIZED TRIAL<br />
C. Polgár 1 , T. Major 1 , J. Fodor 1 , Z. Sulyok 2 , Z. TakacsiNagy 1 , G.<br />
Nemeth 1 , M. Kasler 3<br />
1<br />
National Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy,<br />
Budapest, Hungary<br />
2<br />
National Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Department <strong>of</strong> Surgery, Budapest,<br />
Hungary<br />
3<br />
National Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Director General, Budapest, Hungary<br />
: To report the <strong>10</strong>year results <strong>of</strong> a randomized<br />
study comparing the This survival abstract and cosmetic forms results part <strong>of</strong><br />
breastconserving<br />
treatment the with <strong>of</strong>ficial partial conference breast irradiation media (PBI) programme<br />
or conventional whole<br />
breast and irradiation will be (WBI). available on the day <strong>of</strong> presentation.<br />
: Between 1998 and 2004, 258 selected<br />
patients with T1 N01mi, Grade <strong>12</strong>, nonlobular breast cancer<br />
without presence <strong>of</strong> extensive intraductal component and resected<br />
with negative margins were randomized after breastconserving<br />
surgery to receive 50 Gy WBI (n=130) or PBI (n=<strong>12</strong>8). The latter<br />
consisted <strong>of</strong> either 7 x 5.2 Gy highdoserate (HDR) multicatheter<br />
brachytherapy (BT; n=88) or 50 Gy electron beam (EB) irradiation<br />
(n=40).<br />
: At a median followup time <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>2.5 months, the <strong>10</strong>year<br />
actuarial rate <strong>of</strong> local recurrence was 5.9% and 5.1% in PBI and WBI<br />
arms, respectively (p=0.77). There was no significant difference in the<br />
<strong>10</strong>year probability <strong>of</strong> overall survival (80% vs. 82%), cancerspecific<br />
survival (94% vs. 92%), and diseasefree survival (85% vs. 84%), either.<br />
The rate <strong>of</strong> excellentgood cosmetic result was 81% in the PBI, and<br />
63% in the control group (p=0.0015).<br />
: PBI delivered by interstitial HDR BT or EB for a selected<br />
group <strong>of</strong> earlystage breast cancer patients produces similar <strong>10</strong>year<br />
results to those achieved with conventional WBI. Significantly better<br />
cosmetic outcome can be achieved with carefully designed HDR<br />
multicatheter implants compared with the outcome after WBI.<br />
OC88<br />
FIRST CLINICAL RESULTS OF THE GECESTRO BREAST WG PHASE III<br />
MULTICENTRIC APBI TRIAL.<br />
V. Strnad 1 , O.J. Ott 1 , G. Hildebrandt 2,3 , R. Pötter 4 , R. Fietkau 1,2 , J.<br />
Lyczek 5,8 , W. Uter 6, , T. Major 7 , M. Lotter 1 , C. Polgar 7<br />
1<br />
University Hospital Erlangen, Radiation Oncology, Erlangen, Germany<br />
2<br />
University Hospitals Rostock, Radiation Oncology, Rostock, Germany<br />
3<br />
University Hospital Leipzig, Radiation Oncology, Leipzig, Germany<br />
4<br />
University Hospital AKH, Radiotherapy and Radiobiology, Vienna,<br />
Austria<br />
5<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Warsaw, Poland<br />
6<br />
Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology,<br />
Erlangen, Germany<br />
7<br />
National Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Radiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary<br />
8<br />
Podkarpacki Regional Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, Brzozów,<br />
Poland<br />
: Several Phase II trials have shown that Accelerated Partial<br />
Breast Irradiation (APBI) leads to similar local control rate with lower<br />
toxicity as whole breast irradiation (WBI) after breast conserving<br />
surgery in a selected subgroup <strong>of</strong> breast cancer patients. The primary<br />
objective <strong>of</strong> this randomized multicentric Phase III trial is to compare<br />
multicatheter brachytherapy (BT) alone to WBI in a lowrisk group <strong>of</strong><br />
invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ and to affirm the<br />
hypothesis that local control rates in each arm are equivalent. The<br />
secondary outcome measures include treatmentrelated toxicities,<br />
cosmesis, quality <strong>of</strong> life (QoL) and survival rates. This study is<br />
registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00402519. The rationale, study<br />
design, patients’ and treatment characteristics, and early toxicities<br />
are reported.<br />
: Between <strong>May</strong> 2004 and July 2009, 1195<br />
eligible patients with nodenegative Stage 0/I/II breast cancer were<br />
prospectively enrolled on the protocol. Patients allocated to the<br />
standard arm received 50 Gy WBI in 1.82.0 Gy fractions followed by a<br />
tumor bed boost <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> Gy in 2 Gy fractions. Patients in the<br />
experimental arm were treated with APBI using multicatheter<br />
interstitial BT up to 32.0 Gy/8 fractions or 30.3 Gy/7 fractions (HDR<br />
BT) or up to 50 Gy/0.600.80 Gy (1 pulse/hour, 24 hours/day; PDR<br />
BT). The side effects <strong>of</strong> therapy were documented according Common<br />
Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events v3 and RTOG/EORTC Late<br />
Radiation Morbidity Scoring Scheme. The cosmetic outcome was<br />
judged by digital photographs, for the assessment <strong>of</strong> QoL, repeated<br />
QoLquestionnaires (EORTC QLQC30 including the Breast cancer<br />
module QLQBR23) were used.<br />
: We report on the prospectively collected data from 1195<br />
patients randomized in the GECESTRO APBI Phase III trial who were<br />
eligible and treated according study protocol (WBI: n = 568 vs. APBI: n<br />
= 624). At the time <strong>of</strong> analysis complete followup documentation <strong>of</strong><br />
early toxicities was available for 98.2% (1170/1192) <strong>of</strong> the patients.<br />
Both WBI and APBI were well tolerated with moderate early toxicities<br />
at the end <strong>of</strong> therapy: acute dermatitis (Grade 1: 49.4% vs. 18.4%,<br />
Grade 2: 35.7% vs. 2.1%, Grade 3: 7.1% vs. 0.2%; p 2 mm in 83% <strong>of</strong><br />
patients. Seventy per cent had T 01 tumors and 85% were ER positive.<br />
Seventyone per cent <strong>of</strong> patients were node negative, with <strong>12</strong>% N1, 3%<br />
N0 (i+), and 1.5% N1mic. According to the ASTRO Consensus Guidelines<br />
for use <strong>of</strong> APBI (2009) none <strong>of</strong> these patients would be classified as<br />
suitable based upon age criteria.<br />
: Median age was 48 years (range 39 – 50). With a median<br />
followup <strong>of</strong> 6.2 years (range 1.6 – 16.9) the 5year actuarial local<br />
recurrence rate (LR) was 3%; no regional recurrences (RR) were<br />
documented. Additionally, no distant metastases were seen. Median<br />
time to LR was 7.0 years. On univariate analysis, there were no<br />
factors significant for LR, this including close/positive margins, ER/PR<br />
status, age, nodal status, tumor size, histology, grade, hormonal<br />
therapy or chemotherapy. The 5year actuarial cause specific,<br />
diseasefree, and overall survivals were <strong>10</strong>0%, 97%, and <strong>10</strong>0%,<br />
respectively.<br />
: This cohort <strong>of</strong> young aged patients who have undergone<br />
APBI has yielded excellent localregional control rates and survival<br />
outcomes comparable to more traditional whole breast irradiated<br />
patients. Continued followup along with accrual <strong>of</strong> additional<br />
patients into such protocols as the NSABP B39/RTOG 0413 (which<br />
continues to enroll young patients) will be needed to assess the long<br />
term efficacy <strong>of</strong> breast cancer patients aged 50 or younger treated<br />
with APBI.<br />
OC91<br />
LONG TERM OUTCOMES AND RECURRENCE PATTERN FOLLOWING<br />
ACCELERATED PARTIAL BREAST IRRADIATION USING MAMMOSITE<br />
A. Ravi 1 , C. Sison 2 , A. Osian 3 , S. Lee 4 , D. Nori 1<br />
1<br />
New York Hospital Queens Weill Cornell Medical College, Radiation<br />
oncology, Flushing NY, USA<br />
2<br />
Feinstein Institute for Medical research North Shore LIJ health<br />
System, Biostatistics, Manhasset, USA<br />
3<br />
New York Hospital Queens, Radiation Oncology, Flushing, USA<br />
4<br />
New York Hospital Queens, Surgery, Flushing, USA<br />
: To evaluate: 1. The incidence <strong>of</strong> locoregional<br />
recurrence in early breast cancer treated by APBI using the<br />
MammoSite device in patients grouped according to ASTRO consensus<br />
panel 'suitable 'and 'cautionary' category.<br />
2. The recurrence pattern in patients with 'triple negative tumor' (TN)<br />
(negative <strong>Estro</strong>gen, Progesterone receptor and Human Epidermal<br />
Growth factor (HER2)) and the association and outcomes <strong>of</strong> African<br />
American, Hispanic ethnicity and ER negative tumor.<br />
: Between June 2003 and December 2009, 83<br />
postmenopausal patients:76 invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), 7 ductal<br />
carcinoma in situ (DCIS), with diagnosis <strong>of</strong> early stage breast cancer<br />
and node negative status met our inclusion criteria for APBI using the<br />
single lumen MammoSite balloon catheter. Following a CT scan based<br />
3D plan a dose <strong>of</strong> 3400cGy was prescribed in <strong>10</strong> fractions at distance<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1 cm from surface <strong>of</strong> balloon delivered twice daily, 6 hours apart<br />
using the high dose rate system. Patients were categorized as 4<br />
groups: ASTRO consensus 'suitable', 'cautionary', TN and TN plus Her2<br />
positive ('High Risk'). Data on treatment outcome with for ipsilateral<br />
breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), tumor bed area failure (TBF),<br />
elsewhere failure in the same breast (EF), ipsilateral axilla failure<br />
(IAF) was analyzed.<br />
: There were 42/83 (51%) patients in the 'suitable' and 41/83<br />
(49%) in the 'cautionary' group. TN was 11% (8/76) and 'High risk' was<br />
24% (18/76) <strong>of</strong> invasive cancer patients. Mean age <strong>of</strong> invasive cancer<br />
patients was 72 years. Median followup for all 83 patients was 61<br />
months; 'cautionary' group= 61 months; triple negative= 59; 'suitable'<br />
group=61 and 'High risk'= 59. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given in 18%<br />
(14/76) and hormones in 85% ER+ IDC patients. The locoregional<br />
control was 98.6%. IBTR that was EF occurred in 2/83 (2.4%) patients;<br />
one from the 'cautionary' group (ER, HER2+) and another from the<br />
'suitable' group (ER+, HER2). IAF was seen in the first patient. There<br />
was a significant association between tumor grade and ethnicity with<br />
grade 3 tumors seen more in Hispanic and black women as compared<br />
to others (31% vs. 8%; p=0.03) in the invasive group.<br />
There was a higher proportion <strong>of</strong> ERnegative tumors seen among<br />
African American and Hispanics compared to other ethnicities (56.25%<br />
vs. 8.33%; p
S38 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
: There was very low occurrence <strong>of</strong> IBTR at a median<br />
follow up <strong>of</strong> 5 years in 'suitable', 'cautionary', TN and 'High risk' group<br />
<strong>of</strong> postmenopausal node negative early breast cancer patients<br />
treated with APBI using the MammoSite balloon device. Long term<br />
outcomes <strong>of</strong> APBI in AA and Hispanic patients with TN tumors should<br />
be further investigated.<br />
OC92<br />
IMPACT OF MARGIN STATUS AFTER APBI: AN ANALYSIS OF THE<br />
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF BREAST SURGEONS MAMMOSITEÆ REGISTRY<br />
TRIAL<br />
J.B. Wilkinson 1 , C. Shah 1 , M. Keisch 2 , P. Beitsch 3 , D. Arthur 4 , M.<br />
Lyden 5 , F.A. Vicini 6<br />
1<br />
Oakland University William Beaumont School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Radiation<br />
Oncology, Royal Oak MI, USA<br />
2<br />
Cancer HealthCare Associates University <strong>of</strong> Miami Hospital,<br />
Radiation Oncology, Miami FL, USA<br />
3<br />
Dallas Surgical Group, Breast Surgery, Dallas TX, USA<br />
4<br />
Virgina Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center, Radiation<br />
Oncology, Richmond VA, USA<br />
5<br />
Biostat International Inc., Statistics, Tampa FL, USA<br />
6<br />
Michigan Healthcare Pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, Radiation Oncology, Pontiac MI,<br />
USA<br />
: At this time, data regarding the impact <strong>of</strong> close<br />
or positive surgical margins on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence<br />
(IBTR) is limited to traditional breastconserving therapy (BCT) using<br />
whole breast irradiation (WBI). This study examines the impact <strong>of</strong><br />
margin status on IBTR for patients who received applicatorbased<br />
accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) as part <strong>of</strong> the American<br />
Society <strong>of</strong> Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) MammoSite ® Breast <strong>Brachytherapy</strong><br />
Registry Trial.<br />
: 1449 cases <strong>of</strong> earlystage breast cancer were<br />
prospectively treated with BCT on the ASBrS MammoSite ® Registry<br />
Trial. The MammoSite ® singlelumen Radiation Therapy System (RTS)<br />
(Bedford, MA) was used to deliver adjuvant APBI to the tissue<br />
surrounding the lumpectomy cavity (34 Gy in 3.4 Gy fractions, BID).<br />
<strong>12</strong>55 cases (87%) had invasive breast cancer (median size = <strong>10</strong>mm) and<br />
194 cases had DCIS (median size = 8mm). Patients were stratified by<br />
margin status into negative (n=1326), close (< 2mm) (n=1<strong>10</strong>), and<br />
positive (n=13) categories with the IBTR rates compared between<br />
groups.<br />
: One hundred and twenty three ASBrS MammoSite ® Registry<br />
cases (8.5%) had close or positive final margins. In general, the two<br />
groups were well balanced except that patients with close/positive<br />
margins had larger median tumor sizes (11.016.5mm vs. <strong>10</strong>.0mm;<br />
p=0.03, p=0.04) and were more likely to be ER negative (13.615.4%<br />
vs. 9.2%, p=0.01, p=0.03). Positivemargin patients were also more<br />
likely to be node positive (15.4% v. 2.5%, p=0.01) as compared to the<br />
marginnegative cohort. With a median follow up <strong>of</strong> 58.6 months, the<br />
sixyear rate <strong>of</strong> IBTR was double for patients with close margins<br />
compared to that <strong>of</strong> marginnegative patients (8.7% v. 4.1%, p=0.<strong>10</strong>)<br />
and over threefold higher in patients with positive margins (14.3% v.<br />
4.1%, p=0.41). When both groups were pooled, a trend towards<br />
increased IBTR was noted for women with close/positive margins<br />
compared with the negativemargin cohort (9.3% v. 4.1%, p=0.07).<br />
Cases <strong>of</strong> pure DCIS with involved margins had statistically higher IBTR<br />
rates vs. those with negative margins (15.717.6% vs. 4.2%, p=0.01).<br />
No differences emerged in other clinical outcomes by margin status<br />
including regional failure, distant metastasis, diseasefree survival,<br />
causespecific survival, or overall survival.<br />
: Good clinical outcomes were seen in patients undergoing<br />
APBI regardless <strong>of</strong> margin status. However, trends for increased rates<br />
<strong>of</strong> IBTR were noted in patients with close or positive margins; similar<br />
to what is observed with WBI. This analysis supports the<br />
recommendation to obtain margins <strong>of</strong> 2mm or greater prior to<br />
adjuvant application <strong>of</strong> APBI. Further prospective studies are required<br />
to validate these results and assist in the definition <strong>of</strong> appropriate<br />
margin status for patients treated with accelerated partial breast<br />
irradiation.<br />
<br />
<br />
93<br />
TG138 REPORT: UNCERTAINTIES IN PHOTON EMITTING<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY SOURCE DOSIMETRY<br />
B. Thomadsen 1 , L. DeWerd 1 , G. Ibbott 2 , A. Meigooni 3 , M. Mitch 4 , M.<br />
Rivard 5 , K. Stump 6 , J. Venselaar 7<br />
1<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin School <strong>of</strong> Medicine and Public Health,<br />
Medical Physics, Madison Wisconsin, USA<br />
2<br />
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Radiation Physics, Houston Texas, USA<br />
3<br />
Comprehensive Cancer Center <strong>of</strong> Nevada, Radiation Oncology, Las<br />
Vegas Nevada, USA<br />
4<br />
National Institute <strong>of</strong> Standards and Technology, Radiation Division,<br />
Gaithersburg Maryland, USA<br />
5<br />
Tufts University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Boston<br />
Massachusetts, USA<br />
6<br />
Costal Radiation Oncology Group Inc, Santa Maria Radiation Oncology<br />
Center, Santa Maria Califronia, USA<br />
7<br />
Instituut Verbeeten, Medical Physics and Engineering, Tilburg, The<br />
Netherlands<br />
The report <strong>of</strong> Task Group (TG) 138 <strong>of</strong> the American Association <strong>of</strong><br />
Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), in collaboration with the Groupe<br />
Européen de Curiethérapie – European Society for Therapeutic<br />
Radiology and Oncology (GECESTRO) [Medical Physics 38: 782801,<br />
2011], studied the uncertainty in dose delivered to a point in an<br />
infinite water phantom from a single, photonemitting brachytherapy<br />
source, following the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the AAPM’s Task Group 43<br />
(TG 43.) The investigation began with the uncertainties associated<br />
with the calibration <strong>of</strong> sources at the national standards laboratory<br />
and followed through the determination <strong>of</strong> the dosimetric parameters<br />
by measurement and Monte Carlo simulations. The uncertainty<br />
analysis considered those parameters classified by the International<br />
Organization for Standardization as Type A, those amenable to<br />
statistical analysis, and Type B, those requiring different sorts <strong>of</strong><br />
assessment. The relative uncertainties in the individual components <strong>of</strong><br />
the dose calculation were combined in quadrature. The analysis<br />
included the effects <strong>of</strong> phantom construction and composition on<br />
measurements, and interaction data on simulations. Each <strong>of</strong> the TG 43<br />
parameters was considered as well as the transfer <strong>of</strong> the calibration<br />
from the primary standards laboratory to secondary labs and to the<br />
user. The final results for the equivalent <strong>of</strong> one standard deviation<br />
(k=1) in percentage uncertainty are given below. The first values are<br />
for lowenergy sources, while those in parentheses are for highenergy<br />
sources.<br />
Source strength (SK) 1.3 (1.5)<br />
Measured dose 3.6 (3.0)<br />
Monte Carlo 1.7 (1.6)<br />
Interpolation 3.8 (2.6)<br />
Total uncertainty (k=1) 4.4 (3.4)<br />
Expanded Uncertainty (k=2) 8.8 (6.8)<br />
94<br />
SYSTEMATIC OVERVIEW AND REPORTING GUIDELINES FOR<br />
UNCERTAINTIES IN CLINICAL BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
C. Kirisits 1 , M.J. Rivard 2 , F.A. Siebert 3<br />
1<br />
on behalf <strong>of</strong> the GECESTRO uncertainties BRAPHYQS subgroup &<br />
Medical University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Dept. <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy Comprehensive<br />
Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria<br />
2<br />
Tufts University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />
Oncology, Boston, USA<br />
3<br />
UK SH Campus Kiel, Clinic <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Kiel, Germany<br />
The essential result <strong>of</strong> any study on uncertainties <strong>of</strong> clinical<br />
brachytherapy is the impact on absorbed dose. However, only a<br />
couple types <strong>of</strong> uncertainties (i.e. source strength and afterloader<br />
timer) are independent <strong>of</strong> clinical disease site and location <strong>of</strong><br />
administered dose. Therefore, it is not possible to perform an overall<br />
generalized quantitative ranking. While for low energy sources or<br />
situations close to the skin the influence <strong>of</strong> medium on dose<br />
calculation is significant, it is <strong>of</strong> minor importance for high energy<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 39<br />
sources in the pelvic region. The level <strong>of</strong> uncertainties due to target,<br />
<strong>org</strong>an, applicator, and/or source movement in relation to the<br />
geometry assumed for treatment planning is highly dependent on<br />
fractionation and the level <strong>of</strong> imageguided adaptive treatment. The<br />
choice <strong>of</strong> the complexity for such techniques could be based on a<br />
cost/benefit analysis, which needs detailed results from uncertainty<br />
studies. Such studies should report the results in a manner that allows<br />
reproduction and further comparison with other studies:<br />
1. Clearly distinguish between variations, uncertainties, and errors.<br />
2. Quantify Type A and Type B uncertainties, and describe the<br />
approach taken.<br />
3. Present data on the analyzed parameter (distance shifts, volume<br />
changes, source or applicator position, etc…), and also their influence<br />
on absorbed dose for clinicallyrelevant dose parameters (e.g. target<br />
parameters such as D90 or OAR doses).<br />
4. This reporting also can include uncertainties for total dose <strong>of</strong> the<br />
entire treatment course (including several fractions and external<br />
beam dose if applicable) and in terms <strong>of</strong> biological weighted dose as<br />
EQD2.<br />
These comprehensive investigations are important to obtain a general<br />
impression on uncertainties and may help to assess which elements in<br />
the brachytherapy treatment chain need improvement towards<br />
diminishing their dosimetric uncertainties.<br />
95<br />
UNCERTAINTIES IN IMAGE GUIDED BRACHYTHERAPY: ECONOMICAL AND<br />
LOGISTICAL ASPECTS<br />
J.A. Polo Rubio<br />
Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain<br />
Abstract not received<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
96<br />
IS HIGH SAFETY IN BRACHYTHERAPY A RESULT OF ADVANCED<br />
TECHNIQUES AND ADVANCED IMAGING?<br />
D. Baltas<br />
Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach am Main, Germany<br />
Abstract not received<br />
97<br />
STRATEGIES TO PREVENT ERRORS IN BRACHYTHERAPY: LEARNING<br />
FROM OUR MISTAKES<br />
R. Lee 1<br />
1<br />
Duke University Medical Center, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Durham NC, USA<br />
PrecisThis brief session will describe the nature <strong>of</strong> reported errors in<br />
brachytherapy and discuss strategies to prevent errors.<br />
When establishing methods for preventing errors, information on what<br />
errors have occurred in the past proves valuable in directing attention<br />
to aspects <strong>of</strong> a procedure posing the greatest risk. The lecture will<br />
begin with examples <strong>of</strong> reports in the lay press about brachytherapy<br />
errors. The lecture will continue with a description <strong>of</strong> multiple<br />
publications that describe examples <strong>of</strong> errors in brachytherapy<br />
reported to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)<br />
and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The specifics<br />
from the <strong>events</strong> at Philadelphia VA will be reviewed as well. The<br />
lecture will finish with practical recommendations that may prevent<br />
brachytherapy errors in the future.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
98<br />
ROBOT ASSISTED MESH BRACHYTHERAPY AFTER SUBLOBAR RESECTION<br />
FOR EARLY STAGE LUNG CANCER<br />
D. Khuntia 1 , G.H. Dunnington 2 , C. Platta 3 , R.R. Patel 1<br />
1<br />
Western Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Mountain View,<br />
USA<br />
2<br />
Stanford University, Thoracic Surgery, Palo Alto, USA<br />
3<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin, Human Oncology, Madison, USA<br />
Lobectomy has long been the standard <strong>of</strong> care for the management <strong>of</strong><br />
patients with early stage lung cancer. More recently, this has been<br />
challenged as advanced radiotherapy techniques are showing<br />
excellent long term local control approaching that <strong>of</strong> lobectomy.<br />
However, the latter makes assumptions about nodal disease and<br />
occasionally histology, that can dramatically affect the impact on<br />
adjuvant therapy. Recently, there has been resurgence in the United<br />
States <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> sublobar resections for patients that are not able<br />
to tolerate a lobectomy. However, sublobar resection does result in a<br />
a staple line that has a non – trivial risk <strong>of</strong> local recurrence. Methods,<br />
such as mesh brachytherapy have been explored and have shown in<br />
single institution series the ability to dramatically decrease the local<br />
recurrences. Prospective trials are underway to further quantify this<br />
benefit. One <strong>of</strong> the downsides <strong>of</strong> using mesh brachytherapy is that<br />
there is radiation exposure to the team handling the mesh. Novel<br />
methods, utilizing robotic technology, have allowed us to improve the<br />
safety and precision <strong>of</strong> this procedure. In this lecture we will describe<br />
both the rationale and methods for robot assisted mesh brachytherapy<br />
after sublobar resection.<br />
99<br />
RIGID RECTOSCOPY TO IMPROVE RADIATION TARGETING AND<br />
INDIVIDUALISE MANAGEMENT OF RECTAL CANCER<br />
J.P. Gérard 1<br />
1 Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Radiation Oncology, Nice, France<br />
: In rectal cancer most <strong>of</strong> the time radiotherapy (RT) is given<br />
front line and the identification <strong>of</strong> the GTV is important to target<br />
properly the beams. Assessment <strong>of</strong> the GTV (and CTV) can be made<br />
with imaging(CT scan, MRI, ERUS, PetCT etc…) . Clinical examination<br />
with Digital examination (DE) and endoscopy is essential for GTV<br />
evaluation. Endoscopy can be performed in different way (flexible<br />
colo or sigmoidoscopy). Rigid rectoscopy (RR) is a relevant alternative<br />
: RR is performed on an ambulatory basis, in the knee chest<br />
position. A small bowel preparation is necessary. A disposable plastic<br />
rectoscope is used with cold light, insuflation and succion. The<br />
diameter <strong>of</strong> the RR is 2.5 cm. Biopsy can be taken with forceps.<br />
Fiducial marker can be implanted to localize the tumor. Pictures <strong>of</strong><br />
the tumor can be taken with a camera. This examination is lasting 2<br />
to 5 minutes and can be easily repeated at each visit.<br />
:<br />
1 With RR it is possible to see the tumor and localize it precisely in<br />
the rectum which is important for proper delineation on the planning<br />
CT scan. The tumor response is evaluated according to RECIST<br />
criteria. RR can be performed each week during RT and after<br />
treatment to evaluate the CLINICAL RESPONSE (CR) which as strong<br />
predictive and prognostic value (1). A complete CR after neoadjuvant<br />
treatment is defined as no visible tumor and a rectal wall supple or<br />
with a slight non suspicious induration.<br />
If a CCR is achieved the surgeon may reapraize his initial decision and<br />
move to a more conservative type <strong>of</strong> surgery (1).<br />
2 To perform contact XRay (CXRT) it is mandatory to use RR which is<br />
necessary to position the XRay tube in contact to the tumor under<br />
vision control. The diameter <strong>of</strong> this applicator is usually 3 cm ; with<br />
the Papillon 50 TM it is possible to use applicators <strong>of</strong> 2.5 or 2.2 cm easy<br />
to introduce.<br />
The merit <strong>of</strong> CXRT is to safely increase (50 to 1<strong>10</strong> Gy in 3 to 4<br />
fractions) the dose to the rectal tumor. The randomized trial Lyon<br />
R9602 has shown that CXRT+EBRT was increasing significantly the<br />
CCR (29%) and the rate <strong>of</strong> colostomy free <strong>10</strong> year survival (60%) (2).
S40 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
CXRT alone or combined with external beam RT can definitively<br />
control 80 to 90% <strong>of</strong> T1 or T2 N0 tumors not exceeding 4 cm in<br />
diameter (3).<br />
: Clinical examination <strong>of</strong> the tumor with RR is an essential<br />
step <strong>of</strong> the management <strong>of</strong> rectal cancer with radiotherapy. It is<br />
simple and fast to perform but need some clinical practice. Radiation<br />
oncologists treating rectal cancers (and all surgeons) should become<br />
familiar with RR and use it on a routine basis.<br />
References:<br />
Ortholan C et al. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:302<strong>10</strong>.<br />
Gérard JP et al. IJRBOP 2011 ;81(2) : abstract 191<br />
Gérard JP et al. Lancet Oncol 2003 ;4(3) :15866.<br />
<strong>10</strong>0<br />
RADIOLOGICAL INTERVENTION<br />
G. Gademann 1 , J. Ricke 2<br />
1<br />
OttovonGuerickeUniversität, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy,<br />
Magdeburg, Germany<br />
2<br />
OttovonGuerickeUniversität, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology and Nuclear<br />
Medicine, Magdeburg, Germany<br />
: The new possibilities <strong>of</strong> image guidance by<br />
interventional radiology enable very advanced treatments by<br />
interstitial brachytherapy. Tumors or metastases at almost any<br />
anatomical site may be targeted. In this talk, the spectrum <strong>of</strong><br />
indications will be demonstrated. Clinical and oncological properties<br />
and results will be discussed accordingly.<br />
: Positioning <strong>of</strong> the catheters is carried out by CT<br />
or MRI guidance. The Seldinger technique is applied to place sheaths<br />
in the target volume, which ultimately host the brachytherapy<br />
catheter. Proper localization and a sufficient number <strong>of</strong> catheters are<br />
important to achieve an adjusted dose distribution. In specific cases<br />
this is supported by preplanning using virtual catheters in the<br />
treatment planning system set by a radiooncologist. HDR<br />
brachytherapy with a 192Ir source is dependent on a close inter<br />
disciplinary cooperation <strong>of</strong> radiooncologist and radiointerventionalist.<br />
Since August 2006 1573 patients with liver tumors have been treated,<br />
as well as 163 patients with lung tumors and metastases, 44<br />
retroperitoneal malignancies, 15 renal tumors and 1<strong>10</strong> patients with<br />
tumors in other locations.<br />
: Prospective data is available on HCC as well as colorectal<br />
carcinoma. Outside the liver, prospective data is available on lung and<br />
retroperitoneal treatments. A prospective phase II trial with 83<br />
brachytherapy application for lung malignomas resulted in a local<br />
control rate <strong>of</strong> 92% after <strong>12</strong> months (1 – 21). Minor pneumothorax<br />
occurred in 6 patients (21 %), only in 1 patient a chest tube was<br />
necessary (2 %). There were no changes in the postinterventional vital<br />
capacity.<br />
For the patients with retroperitoneal tumors the results regarding<br />
local control are similar, the complication rate and GI toxicity are<br />
negligible.<br />
: Interventional CT/MRI assisted brachytherapy is typically<br />
an interdisciplinary approach. In almost every anatomical site where<br />
the interventional radiologist may place a catheter brachytherapy is<br />
able to deliveran adequate dose usually as a single fraction. Our<br />
results demonstrate CT guided brachytherapy is safe and highly<br />
effective. It is important to further define appropriate indications<br />
with regard to a) alternative therapeutic approaches such as<br />
extracerebral stereotactical irradiation with hyp<strong>of</strong>ractionation<br />
schemes and b) general oncological considerations. The lecture will<br />
provide facts for this discussion.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>10</strong>1<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY: THE IAEA VISION AND POLICY.<br />
E. Fidarova 1 , E.H. Zubizarreta 1 , J. Wondergem 1 , I. Stojkovski 1 , E.<br />
Rosenblatt 1<br />
IAEA, Applied Radiation Biology and Radiotherapy Section, Vienna,<br />
Austria<br />
In the field <strong>of</strong> Human Health and radiotherapy in particular, the<br />
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has an objective to<br />
enhance Member States’ (MS) capabilities to establish sound policies<br />
for radiotherapy and cancer treatment, to improve access to<br />
radiotherapy worldwide and to ensure the effective and safe<br />
application <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy technologies.<br />
<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> (BT) is an essential component <strong>of</strong> cancer treatment<br />
and activities in this field have always been among IAEA’s priorities.<br />
The IAEA has a number <strong>of</strong> possibilities to address the needs <strong>of</strong> MS<br />
related to BT. Technical Cooperation (TC) Programme comprises<br />
national and regional projects, with either bilateral cooperation<br />
between individual MS or between a group <strong>of</strong> MS in the region and<br />
IAEA. These projects are unique vehicles through which a MS may<br />
obtain knowledge, skills or technology from the Agency or other MS.<br />
Typical examples <strong>of</strong> TC projects are the initiation <strong>of</strong> a highdose rate<br />
(HDR) BT unit, upgrade <strong>of</strong> BT department or introduction <strong>of</strong> a new BT<br />
technique.<br />
The IAEA conducts radiotherapy and radiobiology multicentre<br />
international trials under Coordinated Research Project (CRP)<br />
Programme. They are designed to answer scientific questions relevant<br />
to the radiation oncology community and applicable in busy<br />
radiotherapy departments within limited resource setting. Additional<br />
benefit for participating institutions includes research capacity<br />
building and gaining expertise in conducting radiotherapy trials. Two<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong> currently running CRPs are randomised studies on oesophageal<br />
and cervical cancer investigating clinical outcome and toxicity <strong>of</strong> a<br />
resourcesparing schedule <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy with BT component. The<br />
results <strong>of</strong> CRPs are usually published as IAEA documents with free<br />
access and/or in scientific peerreviewed journals.<br />
The IAEA places a lot <strong>of</strong> emphasis on training and education both in BT<br />
and in external beam radiotherapy. This is achieved through<br />
producing learning and educational materials, making them available<br />
in IAEA <strong>of</strong>ficial languages, <strong>org</strong>anizing and conducting training courses<br />
and workshops, assistance in planning and implementation <strong>of</strong> long<br />
term training and education programmes at the national or regional<br />
level. Recent publications include a full series <strong>of</strong> syllabi for the<br />
training and education <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy pr<strong>of</strong>essionals. The IAEA<br />
develops clinical guidelines for management <strong>of</strong> selected types <strong>of</strong><br />
cancer or clinical situations that are very common in low and middle<br />
income MS. Described approach and techniques are intended to be<br />
simple, feasible and resource sparing to the extent that is possible<br />
when dealing with a complex treatment modality. Such clinical<br />
guidelines on cervical and prostate cancers are in press and will be<br />
available later this year. Another important publication<br />
“Implementation <strong>of</strong> HDR BT in limited resource setting” is planned to<br />
be published in 20<strong>12</strong>/2013. The document covers a broad range <strong>of</strong><br />
relevant subjects, as necessary infrastructure, requirements for<br />
personnel and training, quality assurance, radiation safety and current<br />
applications <strong>of</strong> HDR BT.<br />
The Division <strong>of</strong> Human Health supports and promotes elearning and<br />
mlearning. The recently launched Human Health Campuswebpage<br />
and its mobile version are educational and informational portals for<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essionals in radiation medicine. Development <strong>of</strong> learning<br />
resources was performed in close collaboration with pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
educationalists. Among available educational tools are recorded<br />
lectures, interactive case studies and videos containing guide<br />
questions and answers.<br />
It is worth emphasizing that Agency’s policy in reference to<br />
brachytherapy promotes resourcesparing approaches with support <strong>of</strong><br />
HDR brachytherapy, Co 60 brachytherapy, short fractionation schedules,<br />
and the use <strong>of</strong> fixedgeometry applicators (e.g. tandemring).<br />
Having more than half a century history <strong>of</strong> promoting and supporting<br />
<strong>of</strong> radiotherapy and BT in treatment <strong>of</strong> cancer, the IAEA is proud <strong>of</strong> its<br />
success stories. One <strong>of</strong> the recent examples is establishing a HDR BT<br />
unit in ElSalvador.<br />
<strong>10</strong>2<br />
UICC: RADIATION THERAPY IN THE WORLD<br />
M. Gospodarowicz 1<br />
1<br />
Princess Margaret Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Toronto,<br />
Canada<br />
Radiotherapy is a critical ingredient <strong>of</strong> comprehensive cancer<br />
treatment. It has been estimated that anywhere from 40 to 50<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 41<br />
percent <strong>of</strong> all cancer patients would benefit from receiving<br />
radiotherapy in course <strong>of</strong> their illness. Radiotherapy can be used as a<br />
sole curative therapy, in combination with surgery and/ or<br />
chemotherapy as part <strong>of</strong> the initial curative treatment approach, in<br />
the management <strong>of</strong> recurrent disease, and as a powerful tool for<br />
palliation.<br />
Currently, the supply <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy services falls short <strong>of</strong> demand in<br />
many parts <strong>of</strong> the world including many <strong>of</strong> high income countries.<br />
However, the shortage is so pronounced in low and middle income<br />
countries that it precludes radiotherapy from being considered as part<br />
<strong>of</strong> cancer management. In fact, there are many countries in Africa<br />
with no access or access limited to one or two centres. It is estimated<br />
that in Africa, only 18% <strong>of</strong> the published need <strong>of</strong> the minimal need <strong>of</strong><br />
one treatment unit per million population in Africa. In Indonesia,<br />
available radiotherapy resources represent less than <strong>10</strong>% <strong>of</strong> national<br />
need. This in spite <strong>of</strong> a large number <strong>of</strong> cervical cancer cases best<br />
managed with curative radiotherapy. Large gaps also exist in high<br />
income countries that face not only shortages <strong>of</strong> equipment, staff, but<br />
also limited access to new technologies. Radiotherapy is one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
most cost effective and safe cancer treatments available today. To<br />
execute treatment process safely and effectively, an initial<br />
investment into facility, equipment, staff training and ongoing<br />
investment in quality programs is required.<br />
The IAEA has developed a number if guidelines for safe deployment <strong>of</strong><br />
radiation therapy programs. The IAEA has also developed a<br />
Programme for Action for Cancer Therapy (PACT) whose mission is to<br />
contribute to the improvement in cancer survival in developing<br />
countries by integrating radiotherapy investment into health system.<br />
PACT integrates radiotherapy within a comprehensive cancer strategy<br />
within the framework <strong>of</strong> a National Cancer Control Plan. However, in<br />
spite <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> partner <strong>org</strong>anizations, the resources available to<br />
IAEA and PACT Programme are limited. If we are going to witness<br />
improvement in access to radiotherapy in the world, we must change<br />
the current strategy <strong>of</strong> reliance on WHO and IAEA to solve the<br />
problem. The UICC is working together with WHO, IAEA, and its<br />
member <strong>org</strong>anizations to put cancer on the global agenda to secure<br />
improved funding. However, cancer requires complex interventions<br />
and there will be numerous priorities for the use <strong>of</strong> funds.<br />
The national and international radiation therapy <strong>org</strong>anizations should<br />
consider their role in global advocacy for cancer control, especially in<br />
advocacy for radiation therapy. More complete data are required<br />
describing radiotherapy resources including required manpower and<br />
technology for optimal deployment <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy. Many countries<br />
do not recognize medical physicists and radiation therapists as<br />
essential medical personnel. Information regarding infrastructure<br />
required for equipment operation (power supply, service, availability<br />
<strong>of</strong> parts, etc) is frequently incomplete. Resource rich countries should<br />
<strong>of</strong>fer training and assistance to those less resources not only in<br />
providing personnel and medical training but also advocacy and<br />
implementation science support. This help should not be limited to<br />
northsouth help or westeast but also east east and southsouth<br />
help. In addition, the radiotherapy industry should join forces with<br />
other partners to develop affordable sources <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy<br />
equipment coupled with sustainable service provision.<br />
Global radiation oncology community must join forces to assist the<br />
governments in making rational choices in identifying best strategies<br />
to improves cancer control; strategies that include radiotherapy.<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>10</strong>3<br />
WHAT ARE THE BEST INDICATIONS FOR BRACHYTHERAPY IN NON<br />
MELANOMA SKIN CANCERS?<br />
M. Delannes 1<br />
1 Institut Claudius Regaud, Radiation Oncology, Toulouse, France<br />
Non melanoma skin cancers are highly curable tumors mostly located<br />
in sun exposed areas, with an increased incidence in elderly. The goal<br />
<strong>of</strong> the treatment is to obtain cure with the best achievable cosmetic<br />
and functional results. Different modalities have been applied:<br />
dermatologic treatments, surgery alone or in combination with<br />
external beam radiotherapy, or interstitial low dose rate (LDR)<br />
brachytherapy. More recently, high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy<br />
have been proposed with specific, customized or not, surface<br />
applicators.<br />
Surgery remains the treatment <strong>of</strong> choice if it can be used simply and<br />
safely, when negative microscopic margins can be achieved without<br />
compromising cosmesis or function.<br />
External beam irradiation with electrons can be indicated in locally<br />
advanced lesions (size or thickness), not accessible to other treatment<br />
modalities.<br />
In the other situations, brachytherapy is an excellent option. The<br />
greater experience have been gained with LDR interstitial<br />
treatments, specially for periorificial lesions. The flexibility and<br />
thinness <strong>of</strong> the Iridium wires, the adaptation <strong>of</strong> their longer to the<br />
lesions <strong>of</strong>fer personalized treatments easy to perform with minimally<br />
traumatic implants. The limitation <strong>of</strong> this approach is that patient<br />
isolation is required for several days.<br />
HDR could be used as interstitial as well, but necessitates to use<br />
thicker catheters to allow the passage <strong>of</strong> the HDR Ir source, limiting<br />
its use in fragile areas, such as eyelid. Surface applicators can<br />
overcome this problem, but seem to be more suitable for flat<br />
surfaces, and have some technical limitations, particularly in case <strong>of</strong><br />
thick lesions or necessity <strong>of</strong> placement <strong>of</strong> bent catheters. This<br />
technique can be particularly convenient for the elderly patients,<br />
allowing outpatient treatments.<br />
The acute tolerance <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy is excellent, with grade1 to 2<br />
skin toxicity resolving in 4 to 6 weeks with topical treatments.<br />
Cosmetic and functional results are reported as excellent, with local<br />
control rate comparable to surgery or external beam radiotherapy.<br />
During the lecture, brachytherapy indications will be illustrated with<br />
clinical examples.<br />
<strong>10</strong>4<br />
PHYSICS REQUIREMENTS FOR SKIN BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
J. PerezCalatayud 1<br />
1 Hospital Universitario La Fe, Radiotherapy, Valencia, Spain<br />
Skin or superficial brachytherapy is the modality in which the sources<br />
are set outside, or in contact with, the patient skin. In this<br />
presentation we will focus on the widely extended HDR superficial<br />
brachytherapy. There are two main techniques available:<br />
The first one consists on a simple plane implant using parallel<br />
catheters typically spaced 1 cm following the skin surface. This<br />
configuration is preserved using moulds or flaps, i.e., Freiburg Flap,<br />
depending on the skin curvature. Flaps are designed to keep the<br />
distance between catheters. Typically, the prescription depth is 5<br />
mm. The second technique uses specific applicators, i.e., Leipzig or<br />
Valencia, where the typical prescription depth is 3 mm.<br />
Several physics aspects should be considered in this modality for<br />
treatment planning calculation and will be discussed on this<br />
presentation.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the available TPS perform calculations based on the TG43<br />
method assuming full scatter conditions. In the mould/flap cases,<br />
there is significant lack <strong>of</strong> scatter that could influence the uncertainty<br />
on the dose rate distribution and prescribed dose. In this presentation<br />
deviations between TG43 derived dose distributions and realistic ones<br />
obtained using Monte Carlo methods are evaluated for different<br />
source disposition (involved area), distance to skin (in contact to<br />
several mm), prescription depth (typically 5 mm), use <strong>of</strong> backscatter<br />
tissue equivalence material (typically up to 2 cm), and HDR<br />
radionuclide (Ir192, Co60 and Yb169).<br />
Dose distribution for treatment planning with Leipzig or Valencia<br />
applicators cannot be obtained with the conventional calculation TG<br />
43 approach existing on most <strong>of</strong> the current TPS. Monte Carlo<br />
obtained data are used as will be included in this presentation.<br />
Alternative techniques as the Tufts Technique (Rivard 2009) and<br />
modern algorithms will be discussed.<br />
In clinical practice, special attention should be focused on shielding<br />
and leakage for these applicators. We will illustrate this issue on this<br />
presentation. Similarly, depth evaluation methodology using specific<br />
ultrasound techniques will be addressed.<br />
Commissioning <strong>of</strong> these applicators will be discussed, including<br />
acceptance, source positioning, flatness/symmetry, output, % depth<br />
dose, etc. Finally, it will be complemented with patient specific<br />
aspects as setup <strong>of</strong> the applicators and quality assurance.
S42 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
<strong>10</strong>5<br />
SKIN BRACHYTHERAPY FROM THE DERMATOLOGIST SIDE<br />
J. Strasswimmer<br />
Mohs Surgery Institute <strong>of</strong> Excellence <strong>of</strong> the Dermatology Associates,<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Dermatology, Delray Beach, USA<br />
Abstract not received<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>10</strong>6<br />
GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE ON GYNECOLOGIC BRACHYTHERAPY:<br />
CHALLENGES AND DEVELOPMENTS<br />
A. Viswanathan 1<br />
1<br />
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Boston, USA<br />
The management <strong>of</strong> locally advanced cervical cancer has undergone<br />
several fundamental shifts over the past 20 years. With the advent <strong>of</strong><br />
threedimensional (3D) imaging, the implementation <strong>of</strong> CT and MRI in<br />
treatment planning for external beam and brachytherapy has resulted<br />
in many improvements in patient outcomes. In this talk, an overview<br />
<strong>of</strong> the state <strong>of</strong> the art technologies related to imaging for cervical<br />
cancer will be summarized and novel technologies reviewed. In<br />
particular, the role <strong>of</strong> imageguided brachytherapy worldwide and its<br />
implications for patient care will be assessed.<br />
<strong>10</strong>7<br />
MULTICENTER STUDIES WITH IMAGE GUIDED BRACHYTHERAPY IN<br />
CERVICAL CANCER<br />
J.C. Lindegaard 1 , C. CharraBrunaud 2 , A. Sturza 3 , C. HaieMeder 4 , C.<br />
Kirisits 3 , K. Tanderup 5 , R. Pötter 3<br />
1<br />
Aarhus University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Aarhus C,<br />
Denmark<br />
2<br />
Centre AlexisVautrin, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Vandoeuvreles<br />
Nancy, France<br />
3<br />
Medical University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Vienna,<br />
Austria<br />
4<br />
Service de Curiethérapie, Institut GustaveRoussy, Paris, France<br />
5<br />
Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus University, Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Radiotherapy Institute <strong>of</strong> Clinical Medicine, Aarhus, Denmark<br />
The GEC ESTRO guidelines for image guided adaptive brachytherapy<br />
(IGABT) in cervical cancer incorporate the use <strong>of</strong> 3D imaging with<br />
applicator in situ and a 4D target concept (volume & time) including<br />
both tumour extent at diagnosis (Intermediate Risk Clinical Target<br />
Volume [IR CTV] and at time <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy (High Risk Clinical<br />
Target Volume [HR CTV]). Several monoinstitutional reports show<br />
significant improved DVH parameters and clinical outcome compared<br />
to historical standard 2D intracavitary BT but higher level clinical<br />
evidence has so far not been published.<br />
Current multicentre studies encompass a completed French non<br />
randomised study comparing 2D and 3D BT (STIC), an ongoing<br />
international prospective observational study (Embrace) and a parallel<br />
retrospective study (retroEmbrace). In STIC planned surgery was used<br />
in 407 patients (group 1 and 2) leaving 235 patients treated with<br />
definitive radio(chemo)therapy (group 3) and 117 <strong>of</strong> these were<br />
treated with 3D IGABT. STIC was open for accrual 20052007. Since<br />
2008 Embrace has recruited about 600 patients and a similar number<br />
<strong>of</strong> patients treated before 2008 have been registered in the<br />
retroEmbrace. The primary endpoint is local control and morbidity is<br />
assessed with CTCAE v3.0 in all 3 studies. Health related quality <strong>of</strong><br />
life is in addition used in Embrace (EORTC C30+CX24). Currently the<br />
FIGO stage distribution in STIC group 3, Embrace and retroEmbrace is<br />
similar with 9<strong>10</strong>% in stage IB1, 6669% in stage IB2IIAIIB and 2425%<br />
in stage IIIIV. Median dose <strong>of</strong> EBRT is also identical (45 Gy/25 fx) in<br />
all 3 studies, but more patients are receiving concomitant<br />
chemotherapy in Embrace (91%) compared to STIC (77%) and<br />
retroEmbrace (83%). In STIC the imaging modality used for 3D planning<br />
<strong>of</strong> BT is mainly CT (82%), IR CTV is used in all patients for BT dose<br />
prescription and 3D BT is delivered with PDR via pure intracavitary<br />
(IC) implants. MRI is the main imaging modality in retroEmbrace (86%)<br />
and Embrace (<strong>10</strong>0%) and in both studies HR CTV is used in 85% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
patients for BT dose prescription. Dose rate is at the moment 34% HDR<br />
versus 66% PDR in retroEmbrace and 47% HDR versus 53% PDR in<br />
Embrace. In retroEmbrace combined intracavitary/interstitial (IC/IS)<br />
implants is used in 14% <strong>of</strong> the patients increasing to 19% in Embrace.<br />
Reporting <strong>of</strong> dose volume parameters follow the GEC ESTRO guidelines<br />
in all 3 multicentre studies by calculating the equivalent dose in 2 Gy<br />
fractions (EQD2) using a/b=<strong>10</strong> for tumour, a/b=3 for OAR and a repair<br />
halftime <strong>of</strong> 1.5 h (Table 1). The dose received by 90% (D90) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
target (HR CTV and IR CTV) is systematically being reported and for<br />
OAR the minimal dose to the most exposed 2 cm 3 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>org</strong>an (D2cc)<br />
is calculated. The mean volume <strong>of</strong> HR CTV is stable across the 3<br />
studies (3536 cm 3 ). In contrast, there are remarkable differences in<br />
the D90 values between STIC and the Embrace studies reflecting both<br />
different planning aims in terms <strong>of</strong> cumulative EQD2 and the<br />
difference in target volume used for dose prescription (IR CTV versus<br />
HR CTV). The increasing use <strong>of</strong> combined IS/IC implants in<br />
retroEmbrace and Embrace may also contribute to this difference and<br />
may also explain that only a modest increase <strong>of</strong> 27 Gy in the D2cc<br />
values are observed even with a 1115 Gy increase in D90 <strong>of</strong> HR CTV<br />
when comparing STIC and the Embrace studies.<br />
With regard to outcome the STIC study is able to show a significant<br />
decrease in G3G4 morbidity from 23% to 3% and an improved local<br />
control when the 2D and 3D arm <strong>of</strong> the study is compared. Morbidity<br />
data is not yet mature for the Embrace studies, but interestingly it<br />
seems that the increase in D90 <strong>of</strong> HR CTV is accompanied by an<br />
increase in 2 year local control from 79% with STIC to about 90% in the<br />
Embrace studies.<br />
In conclusion, CT based IGABT according to GEC ESTRO guidelines may<br />
significantly lower the G34 morbidity in a multicentre setting. MRI<br />
based IGABT, use <strong>of</strong> HR CTV for dose prescription and use <strong>of</strong> IC/IS<br />
implants in selected cases may further improve the dose distribution,<br />
resulting in even higher rates <strong>of</strong> local control with no apparent loss in<br />
the therapeutic index.<br />
Table 1 HR CTV<br />
HR<br />
CTV<br />
volume mean,<br />
cm 3<br />
D90<br />
EQD2<br />
IR<br />
CTV<br />
D90<br />
EQD2<br />
Bladder Rectum Sigmoid<br />
D2cc<br />
EQD2<br />
D2cc<br />
EQD2<br />
D2cc<br />
EQD2<br />
STIC 3D, group<br />
35<br />
3<br />
73 62 70 61 58<br />
retroEmbrace 36 84 68 76 63 63<br />
Embrace 35 88 69 77 64 63<br />
<strong>10</strong>8<br />
UPCOMING ICRU/GEC ESTRO RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
IN CANCER OF THE CERVIX (1)<br />
R. Pötter 1 , C. Kirisits 1<br />
1 on behalf <strong>of</strong> the ICRU 38 revision committee & Medical University <strong>of</strong><br />
Vienna, Comprehensive Cancer Center Dept. <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Vienna,<br />
Austria<br />
The first ICRU report on intracavitary brachytherapy (38) was<br />
published in 1985. In 1999 an ICRU committee was initiated to<br />
perform a revision due to various developments in the fields, as e.g.<br />
imaging, treatment planning, dose rates. No agreement could be<br />
found during the following years. A new committee was constituted in<br />
2009 with the task to finalize a report as soon as possible based on the<br />
Gyn GEC ESTRO Recommendations which had become wide spread and<br />
widely accepted in the international community.<br />
The current report draft has a strong focus on the 3D image based and<br />
4D adaptive approach. It also includes traditional concepts for 2D<br />
planning which are linked to the 3D world as much as possible both for<br />
target and OAR. The 3D concepts are based on the Gyn GEC ESTRO<br />
recommendation with some further evolution.<br />
The GTV and CTV concepts follow the classical ICRU traditions with a<br />
special focus on the change <strong>of</strong> CTV during treatment. This has lead to<br />
the introduction <strong>of</strong> a High Risk CTV which represents residual GTV and<br />
surrounding areas assumed to carry a high risk for residual cancer<br />
cells. The HR CTV is identified at a certain time point during<br />
treatment by clinical examination and imaging, which is e.g. after 40<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 43<br />
45 Gy EBRT plus chemotherapy in advanced cervical cancer. An<br />
additional Intermediate Risk CTV is suggested representing the area <strong>of</strong><br />
tumour spread at diagnosis and/or a surrounding area around the HR<br />
CTV. Uncertainties for CTV definition and contouring are subsumed<br />
under the CTV. Uncertainties due to internal motion and due to set up<br />
are recognized in the PTV concept. As the applicator is fixed to the<br />
target by the intracavitary/vaginal applicator, no compensation seems<br />
to be necessary according to current evidence. Also set up<br />
uncertainties seem to be minimal according to current knowledge, if<br />
applicator reconstruction is performed appropriately. In any case, the<br />
addition <strong>of</strong> margins (as in EBRT) is not recommended after<br />
application, in particular not orthogonal to the longitudinal axis <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sources. If margins due to such uncertainties are considered, the<br />
suggestion is to design them in the phase <strong>of</strong> planning the application<br />
and to adapt the application as appropriate.<br />
Adjacent (hollow) OARs like rectum, sigmoid, adjacent bowel and<br />
bladder are delineated along their walls and limited absolute<br />
volumes/areas <strong>of</strong> risk are defined, e.g. 2 cm³ and 0.1 cm³. Due to<br />
contouring uncertainties this contouring approach is at present not<br />
recommended for the vagina. Uncertainties due to internal motion are<br />
present for OARs but should not be compensated with adding shell<br />
margins like in EBRT, but rather assessed and individually corrected<br />
for through repetitive imaging.<br />
Dose (rate) per fraction is reported as physical absorbed dose and is<br />
also calculated and reported as isoeffective dose, which is assumed<br />
to correspond to a dose <strong>of</strong> 2 Gy per fraction, EQD2. The total dose in<br />
one value both for the target and for OARs can only be given as EQD2.<br />
The underlying model chosen for these calculations in this report is<br />
the linearquadratic model. Its use is encouraged for the treatment<br />
planning process and for the overall reporting. The limitations <strong>of</strong> this<br />
model are well recognized, and its use has to be mainly understood<br />
from pragmatic reasons. For the calculation <strong>of</strong> the tumour effect a<br />
common α/β value <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> Gy is proposed, for OAR a value <strong>of</strong> 3 Gy. For<br />
doses above 56 Gy per fraction the calculated value seems to<br />
overestimate the effect.<br />
The upcoming ICRU report is based on experiences from 2D and 3D/4D<br />
treatment planning. It summarizes and further evolves the Gyn GEC<br />
ESTRO recommendations as applied so far and proposes these<br />
concepts and terms to create a common language for future efficient<br />
communication within the community to promote research and<br />
development and to improve quality <strong>of</strong> care in the upcoming years.<br />
(For concepts and terms for dose volume parameters and for<br />
the treatment planning process see the following abstract<br />
<strong>of</strong> Kirisits, Pötter on upcoming ICRU/GEC ESTRO<br />
recommendations (2))<br />
<strong>10</strong>9<br />
UPCOMING ICRU/GEC ESTRO RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
IN CANCER OF THE CERVIX (2)<br />
C. Kirisits 1 , R. Pötter 1<br />
1 on behalf <strong>of</strong> the ICRU 38 revision committee & Medical University <strong>of</strong><br />
Vienna, Comprehensive Cancer Center Dept. <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Vienna,<br />
Austria<br />
(For concepts and terms for target and OAR definitions and<br />
biological dose modelling see the preceding abstract <strong>of</strong><br />
Pötter, Kirisits on upcoming ICRU/GEC ESTRO<br />
recommendations (1))<br />
The main parameter for reporting dose to target volumes is D90, which<br />
is already well established and widely reported in singlecenter<br />
experiences as well as for dose response studies. During clinical use <strong>of</strong><br />
D<strong>10</strong>0 it became evident, that DVH sampling introduces major<br />
uncertainties leading to nonreproducible D<strong>10</strong>0 calculations. Therefore,<br />
using the same arguments as in ICRU 83 for IMRT dose reporting, the<br />
D98 is now proposed as an alternative to report the “near” minimum<br />
target dose. In order to quantify high dose volumes within the CTVs<br />
the D50 is included.<br />
In contrast to the initial ICRU 38 report it is recommended to use<br />
point A for dose reporting, which is defined based on the applicator<br />
geometry. It will allow reproducible dose assessment for the 2D<br />
approach, but also consistency and comparability for the 3D approach.<br />
The TRAK, already proposed in ICRU 38 remains an essential reporting<br />
parameter.<br />
For normal tissues D2cm³ and D0.1cm³ are the main parameters for the 3D<br />
approach. The use <strong>of</strong> D1cm³, proposed in the GEC ESTRO<br />
recommendations is not continued as it contains only redundant<br />
information for the dose region already fixed by D2cm³ and D0.1cm³.<br />
Additional parameters for the mid and low dose region are suggested,<br />
mainly reflecting the contribution <strong>of</strong> EBRT. While for bladder, rectum,<br />
sigmoid and bowel DVH parameters are proposed, the situation is<br />
different for the vagina. Due to inherent uncertainties in vaginal wall<br />
delineation and DVH assessment, a point concept is proposed similar<br />
to what has been recommended by ABS, with additions. Especially for<br />
the 2D approach the dose points for rectum and bladder remain from<br />
ICRU 38, but for bladder an additional point cranial to the original<br />
point is proposed.<br />
Beside parameters for evaluation it is underlined in this report that<br />
also the spatial dose distribution within the target and OARs has to be<br />
taken into account. Furthermore, dose to not explicitly contoured<br />
<strong>org</strong>ans at risk has to be considered. The concept <strong>of</strong> reference volume<br />
and treated volume as suggested in ICRU 38 and other ICRU reports<br />
has been replaced by “isodose volumes” which may be linked to<br />
certain dose values selected for various reasons. These values can be<br />
used e.g. for planning aims within a department or for inter<br />
institutional comparisons.<br />
Dedicated sections <strong>of</strong> the report contain recommendations and<br />
information on treatment planning, applicator reconstruction, 3D dose<br />
summation, inter and intrafraction uncertainties, source strength<br />
specification and dose calculation.<br />
A new concept, already proposed in ICRU 83, is introduced for<br />
brachytherapy treatment planning: The “planning aim” is defined<br />
upfront representing a certain “treatment schedule” for a specific<br />
clinical scenario and includes a given set <strong>of</strong> dose and volume<br />
parameters for a specific applicator. During the optimization<br />
treatment planning process, adaptations are performed according to<br />
dose volume constraints for the target and OARs. “Prescription” is<br />
based on the final set <strong>of</strong> parameters which presents the treatment<br />
plan finally sent to the afterloader for irradiation.<br />
The upcoming ICRU report is based on experiences from 2D and 3D/4D<br />
treatment planning. It summarizes and further evolves the Gyn GEC<br />
ESTRO recommendations as applied so far and proposes these<br />
concepts and terms to create a common language for future efficient<br />
communication within the community to promote research and<br />
development and to improve quality <strong>of</strong> care in the upcoming years.<br />
<br />
OC1<strong>10</strong><br />
FUNCTIONAL MRI GUIDED HDR PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY TUMOUR<br />
BOOST: A FEASIBILITY STUDY<br />
J. Mason 1 , B. AlQaisieh 1 , P. Bownes 1 , D. Wilson 1 , D.L. Buckley 2 , D.<br />
Thwaites 3 , B. Carey 4 , A. Henry 5<br />
1<br />
St James Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS<br />
Trust, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics, Leeds, United Kingdom<br />
2<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Leeds, Division <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics, Leeds, United<br />
Kingdom<br />
3<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Institute <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics School <strong>of</strong> Physics,<br />
Sydney, Australia<br />
4<br />
St James Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS<br />
Trust, Radiology, Leeds, United Kingdom<br />
5<br />
St James Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS<br />
Trust, Clinical Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom<br />
<br />
: For standard HDR prostate brachytherapy in<br />
combination with EBRT, a single 15Gy fraction is delivered to the<br />
whole prostate. Tumour control may be improved if regions most<br />
likely to contain higher tumour cell density within the prostate can be<br />
identified and given a higher dose. In this study, the feasibility <strong>of</strong><br />
identifying these tumour regions using MRI, image registration <strong>of</strong> MRI<br />
to treatment planning transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and dose<br />
optimisation to deliver increased dose to tumour regions while<br />
maintaining existing urethral and rectal dose constraints is<br />
investigated.
S44 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
: 15 patients underwent T2weighted (T2W),<br />
diffusion weighted (DWI) and dynamic contrastenhanced (DCE) MRI<br />
scans the day before HDR prostate brachytherapy treatment. For this<br />
feasibility study, all patients were treated using the standard protocol<br />
and the analysis described here was carried out after treatment had<br />
been delivered. Tumour delineation was performed by a radiologist.<br />
Regions suspicious for tumour on all 3 MRI datasets were classed as<br />
gross tumour volume (GTV), regions suspicious on at least one MRI<br />
dataset were classed as clinical target volume (CTV). MRI GTV and<br />
CTVs were manually registered to treatment planning TRUS images. A<br />
margin <strong>of</strong> 3mm was applied to each CTV to allow for contouring and<br />
image registration uncertainties. Dose optimisation was investigated<br />
by comparing the dose delivered to the GTV, CTV and CTV + margin<br />
for (i) the delivered treatment plan and (ii) a modified version <strong>of</strong> the<br />
delivered plan optimising dose to the CTV in a clinically realistic<br />
manner, maintaining urethral and rectal dose at a similar level to the<br />
delivered plan, adding additional HDR needles to target the tumour<br />
area where appropriate.<br />
: In general the suspicious areas on T2W, DWI and DCE MRI<br />
were different but had regions <strong>of</strong> overlap. GTVs were identified in 11<br />
patients with mean volume 0.52 cc (range 0.01 – 1.7 cc). CTVs were<br />
identified in all patients with mean volume 2.6 cc (range 0.<strong>12</strong>3.6 cc).<br />
Though no patient had more than 1 GTV, 5 patients had more than<br />
one CTV. Averaged results for the first 5 patients included in the dose<br />
optimisation study are shown in Table 1. DVH statistics are relative to<br />
<strong>10</strong>0% dose = 15Gy.<br />
Table 1: Mean DVH parameters from dose optimisation study.<br />
D90 (Gy) V150 (%) V200 (%) D<strong>10</strong> (Gy) D2cc (Gy)<br />
(limit 17.5) limit 11.8<br />
Plan:<br />
1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2<br />
1 delivered<br />
2 optimised for<br />
boost<br />
Prostate (whole 17.0 17.2 24.7 36.2 5.7 9.0 <br />
including<br />
CTV)<br />
GTV,<br />
GTV 20.4 29.5 36.0 <strong>10</strong>0.0 3.9 74.9 <br />
CTV 18.6 25.9 26.6 93.8 4.3 54.7 <br />
CTV+margin 18.0 21.9 27.3 82.5 4.8 29.7 <br />
Urethra 17.1 17.2 <br />
Rectum 8.2 8.7<br />
: Functional MRI guided HDR prostate brachytherapy<br />
tumour boost is feasible it is possible to identify tumour regions<br />
within the prostate in the majority <strong>of</strong> patients, and it is possible to<br />
achieve significant increased dose to those regions without violating<br />
urethral and rectal dose constraints. The level <strong>of</strong> dose escalation<br />
varies from patient to patient and is lower if there are multiple<br />
tumour regions, the tumour volumes are large or the tumour regions<br />
are close to either the urethra or rectum.<br />
OC111<br />
IMPROVED APPLICATOR VISUALISATION FOR MRGUIDED BRACHY<br />
THERAPY OF CERVIX<br />
G.P. Liney 1 , C.J. Horsfield 1 , T.J. Murray 1 , A.W. Beavis 1<br />
1<br />
Queens Centre for Oncology Castle Hill Hospital, Radiation Physics,<br />
Hull, United Kingdom<br />
: Following GECESTRO guidelines we are utilising<br />
MRI for Image Guided <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> (IGBT) planning <strong>of</strong> cervix cancer.<br />
The s<strong>of</strong>ttissue contrast from these images is excellent at depicting<br />
the high risk volume and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk. However, one limitation is the<br />
poor visualisation <strong>of</strong> the intrauterine (IU) tube and ring arising from<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> MRcompatible materials (e.g. titanium or plastic) which do<br />
not exhibit a proton signal and appear isointense. Potential remedies<br />
using catheters <strong>of</strong> MRvisible solution have proved unsuccessful;<br />
current practice is to register MRI with CT in which the definition <strong>of</strong><br />
the applicator is much clearer, although the planning system does not<br />
subsequently use the CT numbers. It would be desirable to move<br />
towards MRonly planning removing the repeated use <strong>of</strong> ionising<br />
radiation and as a first step the poor applicator visualisation needs to<br />
be addressed.<br />
The purpose <strong>of</strong> this work was to develop an imaging protocol and<br />
associated postprocessing s<strong>of</strong>tware that can be used to produce a<br />
single MRI dataset providing s<strong>of</strong>ttissue contrast and improved<br />
applicator visualisation.<br />
: A modification to the standard planning<br />
sequence was investigated whereby a dualecho technique was used<br />
to provide two images at every slice location; the first using a short<br />
echo time (TE = 17 ms), to provide protondensity weighting in order<br />
to enhance the contrast between tissue and applicator; the second<br />
image acquired at a longer echo time (TE = <strong>10</strong>0 ms) to provide the<br />
required T2weighted contrast for contouring. Furthermore, the short<br />
TE image has a reduced susceptibility artefact meaning the signal void<br />
more accurately represents the applicator.<br />
Images were automatically processed (MATLAB) to identify the<br />
hypointensity from the central portion <strong>of</strong> the short TE image using an<br />
adaptive histogram threshold with additional morphological<br />
manipulation. These pixels are then 'burnt in' as hyperintensities in<br />
the inherently registered long TE images and converted into a<br />
new DICOM series to be imported into the planning system for<br />
analysis.<br />
The protocol was acquired in a cohort <strong>of</strong> cervix patients to examine<br />
the efficacy <strong>of</strong> introducing the technique into clinical practice.<br />
:<br />
Figure 1 (A) above demonstrates the specific benefits from dualTE<br />
imaging. (B top & bottom) shows a 'burntin' dataset as displayed in<br />
Flexiplan. This combines the T2weighting plus improved visualisation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the ring and IU tube to position the applicator template.<br />
Localisation <strong>of</strong> the applicator was much faster and easier without the<br />
need <strong>of</strong> CT registration. Excellent positional agreement was achieved<br />
when compared to using CT alone (C) and plans were unaltered.<br />
: This study describes a simple but effective technique <strong>of</strong><br />
providing image guidance with the combined advantages <strong>of</strong> both MR<br />
and CT from one single MRI acquisition. Scan time is not extended and<br />
the new dataset is created within a few seconds. The method<br />
described could be used to replace CT entirely and adopt MRonly<br />
planning.<br />
OC1<strong>12</strong><br />
DOES INTERFRACTION CATHETER MOTION AFFECT HRCTV COVERAGE<br />
IN GYNECOLOGIC INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY?<br />
A. Damato 1 , R. Cormack 1 , A. Viswanathan 1<br />
1 Brigham and Women's Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Boston MA, USA<br />
: In this preliminary work we estimated the effect<br />
on HRCTV coverage <strong>of</strong> cranial/caudal interfraction catheter<br />
displacements observed in gynecologic interstitial implants performed<br />
in our clinic.<br />
: Records <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong> patients recently treated in our<br />
clinic with multifraction gynecologic interstitial brachytherapy were<br />
retrospectively analyzed. The patients received between 5 and 9<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 45<br />
fractions twice a day, with reference dose (RX) between 3 Gy and 7.5<br />
Gy per fraction. A clinical plan (CLINICAL) was created on a CT scan<br />
acquired immediately after implantation. The optimization was<br />
performed by manually adjusting dwell times until a satisfactory<br />
compromise was found between HRCTV coverage (maximization <strong>of</strong><br />
V<strong>10</strong>0, D90) and sparing <strong>of</strong> OAR (minimization <strong>of</strong> D2cc <strong>of</strong> rectum,<br />
bladder and sigmoid). A subsequent CT scan (D2_Scan) acquired 4872<br />
hours after implantation was registered to the planning scan based on<br />
rigid fusion <strong>of</strong> the pubic symphysis. The registered D2_Scans were<br />
used to measure the catheter shifts and the <strong>of</strong>fsets (i.e., catheter<br />
slipping into or out <strong>of</strong> the patient) in the cranial (+) / caudal () (CC)<br />
direction. HRCTV V<strong>10</strong>0 and D90 in absolute value and as a percentage<br />
<strong>of</strong> RX were also calculated on two modifications <strong>of</strong> the catheter<br />
digitization <strong>of</strong> CLINICAL: by adjusting the location <strong>of</strong> the catheter tips<br />
to reflect the measured CC shifts (D2_ACTUAL), and by adjusting the<br />
location <strong>of</strong> the catheter tips to emulate the CC shift on the D2_Scan if<br />
catheter <strong>of</strong>fsets are corrected (D2_CORRECTED).<br />
: The overall mean <strong>of</strong> mean shift per patient was 0.2±4.7 mm<br />
(range [rg], 5.3 to 11.9 mm). Singlecatheter shifts between 16.3<br />
mm and 20.0 mm were observed. CLINICAL HRCTV V<strong>10</strong>0 was<br />
86.9±13.0% (rg, 62.5% to 99.6%); D90 was 4.6±2.1 Gy (rg, 1.9 to 9.4<br />
Gy); as a percentage <strong>of</strong> RX this was 99.6±25.9% (rg, 54.1% to <strong>12</strong>6.6%).<br />
D2_ACTUAL HRCTV V<strong>10</strong>0 was 85.7±13.7% (rg, 57.0% to 99.2%); D90<br />
was 4.5±2.1 Gy (rg, 1.7 to 9.4 Gy); as a percentage <strong>of</strong> RX this was<br />
96±25.5% (rg, 52.1% to <strong>12</strong>5.4%). D2_CORRECTED HRCTV V<strong>10</strong>0 was<br />
85.8±13.8% (rg, 60.5% to 99.2%); D90 was 4.5±2.1 Gy (rg, 2.0 to 9.4<br />
Gy); as a percentage <strong>of</strong> RX this was 97.2±25.5% (rg, 48.3% to <strong>12</strong>5.5%).<br />
The largest difference between CLINICAL and D2_ACTUAL in D90, from<br />
119% to <strong>10</strong>5% <strong>of</strong> RX, was observed in a patient without a rectum with<br />
a mean shift <strong>of</strong> 11.9 mm (rg, 8.8 to 20.0 mm). The results per patients<br />
are summarized in the Table.<br />
: Interfraction catheter displacements had a small effect<br />
on HRCTV coverage in the patients analyzed. D90 was observed to<br />
degrade in a patient with large cranial shifts; the resulting D90 was<br />
still clinically acceptable. Large interfraction catheter <strong>of</strong>fsets were<br />
observed, resulting in large shifts <strong>of</strong> single catheters. These large<br />
singlecatheter shifts did not affect the HRCTV coverage. Further<br />
investigation on a larger patient sample will be conducted to validate<br />
our conclusions.<br />
OC113<br />
DYNAMIC MODULATED BRACHYTHERAPY (DMBT): CONCEPT, DESIGN,<br />
AND SIMULATIONS<br />
W. Song 1 , M. Webster 1 , D. Han 1 , J. Einck 1 , D. Scanderbeg 1 , T. Vuong 2 ,<br />
S. Devic 2<br />
1<br />
University <strong>of</strong> California San Diego, Radiation Medicine and Applied<br />
Sciences, La Jolla, USA<br />
2<br />
McGill University, Radiation Oncology, Montreal, Canada<br />
: Colorectal cancer is the third most diagnosed and<br />
third leading cause <strong>of</strong> cancer death among men and women in the US.<br />
In particular, patients with rectal cancer present a wide range <strong>of</strong><br />
disease burden, from very limited mucosal disease to quite advanced<br />
and metastatic disease. <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> <strong>of</strong>fers considerable advantages<br />
over externalbeam RT for this site. With judiciously designed high<br />
doserate (HDR) brachytherapy applicators, high conformality can be<br />
achieved to the tumor volume with significant sparing to healthy<br />
tissues. However, all currently available HDR brachytherapy<br />
applicators are limited by their static designs. By allowing a shielded<br />
applicator to dynamically modulate radiation, far better results can<br />
be achieved. Our system, built from groundsup, named dynamic<br />
modulated brachytherapy (DMBT), uses linear and rotational<br />
modulation <strong>of</strong> a well collimated radiation pr<strong>of</strong>ile to deliver extremely<br />
conformal dosages.<br />
: Our proposed system utilizes a high density<br />
cylindrical tungsten shield, which houses an 192 Ir HDR source, to<br />
generate a highly collimated radiation pr<strong>of</strong>ile (Figure 1). Dosimetric<br />
properties <strong>of</strong> the system are obtained by simulations in the Monte<br />
Carlo NParticle (MCNP) package. An inhouse coded, gradient<br />
projection optimization algorithm calculates the optimal dwell times<br />
for each potential dwell position <strong>of</strong> the system based on the patient<br />
geometry and userassigned weightings. The treatment plans are to be<br />
carried out by a high precision robotic arm. We performed a<br />
treatment plan quality comparison study using a previously treated<br />
clinical data <strong>of</strong> 35 total fractions from <strong>12</strong> patients that were treated<br />
using the Intracavitary Mold Applicator (ICMA).<br />
Figure 1. Prototype DMBT system.<br />
: The results show a striking advantage <strong>of</strong> DMBT over ICMA.<br />
Table 1 shows the dosimetric characteristics <strong>of</strong> the two applicators<br />
averaged over all patient plans. While keeping the prescription dose<br />
constant to <strong>10</strong>Gy, the DMBT produced significantly lower dosages to<br />
all normal structures analyzed for every patient. In addition, the<br />
DMBT system had significantly smaller lateral dose spills. Currently,<br />
the DMBT’s only drawback is its longer total delivery time (i.e., three<br />
times that <strong>of</strong> ICMA). However, the times are still well within the<br />
patient tolerances and we are working to reduce them.<br />
Table 1. Dosimetric characteristics <strong>of</strong> the 35 plans between ICMA and<br />
DMBT.<br />
: The dosimetric properties <strong>of</strong> the novel DMBT device<br />
have been investigated using the MCNP simulations and directly<br />
compared to the ICMA using treated patient plans. The translational<br />
and rotational ability <strong>of</strong> the DMBT device gives it a clear advantage<br />
over ICMA for rectal tumors. It allows for more uniform coverage to<br />
the GTV while significantly increasing sparing to the surrounding<br />
healthy tissues. Considering ICMA is currently the gold standard for<br />
intracavitary brachytherapy, our DMBT system is clearly a great step<br />
forward in HDR brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> rectal cancer.<br />
OC114<br />
ROBOTGUIDED DELIVERY OF BRACHYTHERAPY NEEDLES ALONG NON<br />
PARALLEL PATHS TO AVOID PENILE BULB PUNCTURE<br />
J.A.M. Cunha 1 , A. Garg 2 , T. Siauw 2 , N. Zhang 1 , Y. Zuo 3 , K. Goldberg 2 ,<br />
D. Stoianovici 3 , M. Roach III 1 , J. Pouliot 1<br />
1<br />
University <strong>of</strong> California (UCSF), Radiation Oncology, San Francisco<br />
CA, USA<br />
2<br />
University <strong>of</strong> California, Industrial Engineering and Operations<br />
Research, Berkeley CA, USA<br />
3<br />
Johns Hopkins University, Urology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />
: It has been shown in silico that both PPI and HDR<br />
brachytherapy (BT) plans using nonparallel penilebulbavoiding
S46 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
needle geometries can meet all the standard clinical dose objectives.<br />
This work demonstrates the implantation <strong>of</strong> these patterns into pelvic<br />
phantoms using a robotic brachytherapy device.<br />
: Custom pelvic phantoms (prostate, urethra,<br />
bladder, pubic arch, rectum, & penile bulb) were built and CT used to<br />
generate planning images. Structure vertices were transferred from<br />
the Oncentra planning system to a custom needle optimization engine<br />
to generate a candidate needle set (CNS) within the robot workspace.<br />
The CNS excluded all needles that would puncture nontarget<br />
structures and included both parallel and angulated needles (up to 53<br />
deg. from parallel).<br />
For HDR BT, a custom integer program was built to choose a subset <strong>of</strong><br />
the CNS to be implanted (smallest subset such that every voxel <strong>of</strong> the<br />
target <strong>org</strong>an is within a userspecified distance from a needle). The<br />
resulting planned needle configuration (PNC) was passed to the dose<br />
optimization engine, Inverse Planning by Integer Program (IPIP), for<br />
verification that the PNC supports a clinically viable dose plan. For<br />
PPI, the CNS was passed to Inverse Planning Simulated Annealing<br />
(IPSA), which returns a PNC and seed coordinates.<br />
AcubotRND is a 7DoF stereotactic robot with a remote center <strong>of</strong><br />
motion (RCM) allowing needle pivot around the RCM point. Its<br />
reference frame was calibrated to the phantom for registration to the<br />
planner frame using a CTopaque marker. The robot geometry was<br />
used to calculate an analytic inverse kinematic solution to map every<br />
point in the robot workspace: from 3D coordinate system <strong>of</strong> the<br />
planner to 7D coordinate system <strong>of</strong> the robot. The PNC coordinates<br />
were transferred via a s<strong>of</strong>tware interface that translates the two<br />
coordinate systems to Acubot for insertion. After insertion, the<br />
needles were released in place by the automated needle grippers <strong>of</strong><br />
the robot. Needle stylets were passed through the needle and<br />
deposited in the phantom during needle retraction by the human user<br />
making the implanted needle configuration (INC).<br />
: An input system for Acubot was developed that allowed<br />
digital input <strong>of</strong> needle coordinates. A postimplant CT was obtained,<br />
and for HDR BT the INC was digitized for treatment plan generation.<br />
For PPI, the stylets represent a string <strong>of</strong> seeds and spacers, which<br />
were visible for postimplant dose evaluation. Visual inspection <strong>of</strong> the<br />
INC with respect to PNC verified that the penile bulb and pubic arch<br />
were not punctured. (Figure. Top right: PNC. Top left: INC.) Post<br />
implant CT images verified avoidance <strong>of</strong> urethra puncture.<br />
Satisfaction <strong>of</strong> clinical dose objectives <strong>of</strong> Prostate V<strong>10</strong>0>90%,<br />
V150
S48 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
brachytherapy practice. Model based dosimetry should not be<br />
considered a simple investment on a new treatment planning system<br />
mandated by recommendations or current trend, but rather as an<br />
opportunity for concerted, interdisciplinary effort to reach improved<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> care quality in the near future.<br />
118<br />
THE ADVANTAGES AND CRITICALITIES OF NEW DOSE CALCULATION<br />
ALGORITHMS: WHEN PRESCRIPTION DOSES SHOULD CHANGE?<br />
J.L. Guinot 1<br />
1<br />
Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Valencia, Spain<br />
Prescription dose is one <strong>of</strong> the main points to give an adequate dose<br />
in <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>. But we do not use always the same language.<br />
Radiation oncologists have to explain the radiation physicists what we<br />
really need to give the right dose to the right place. Traditionally dose<br />
has been prescribed to points, as in the Manchester system for<br />
cervical cancers, what can be called prescription 1D. When several<br />
points are required in one plane as in the Paris system we can call<br />
prescription 2D. Nowadays brachytherapy tends to be prescribed to<br />
volumes based on image from computed tomography (CT), magnetic<br />
resonance (MRI) or ultrasound (US). This is the 3D prescription. Last<br />
recommendations suggest that this should be the best way to do the<br />
prescription dose, but we can get some troubles that will be<br />
described.<br />
Four situations can happen with 3D prescription: A) When CTV is clear<br />
and target is well defined, as in cervix with MRI or in prostate with<br />
US, D90 is a good prescription, but doses inside the implant can be<br />
very high and inhomogeneous. Moreover, if a cold spot involves GTV,<br />
this can be a reason for failure at that point. B) When target is not<br />
well defined a prescription dose to a volume can get big differences<br />
depending on the person who draws the target, as it happens in<br />
cervix, prostate or breast with CT. A prescription to points or isodoses<br />
is required and D90 is useful to compare and be sure that the volume<br />
is well covered. C) Sometimes a CTV cannot be drawn on the CT<br />
slides, as in breast with closed cavity, tongue tumours that are<br />
removed, or cavum with complete response. Target is defined by the<br />
implant catheters. If the prescription dose to the target is given to<br />
volume at a certain distance from the implant, big differences <strong>of</strong> real<br />
dose can be achieved depending on the chosen distance, therefore a<br />
calculation by the modified Paris system is mandatory. D) In cases<br />
when there is no target because no image system is used, as in lip<br />
carcinoma and boost breast with needles, modified Paris System is<br />
used to prescribe to an isodose, and calculation should avoid<br />
increased doses at the margins <strong>of</strong> the implant.<br />
In 2D prescription doses are given to a certain distance due to the<br />
sharp gradient, as it happens with a single applicator as esophageal,<br />
bronchial brachytherapy and vaginal cylinders, with two catheters in<br />
endometrium and cavum, and with more in contact brachytherapy to<br />
treat skin tumours. CT can be used to test if prescription doses cover<br />
the volume, but high doses on the surface <strong>of</strong> the applicators must be<br />
taken into account and limit the chance <strong>of</strong> modifying doses. An<br />
agreement is required to prescribe doses at a certain distance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
applicator for every tumoral location.<br />
1D prescription can be useful in some cases <strong>of</strong> choroidal melanoma,<br />
esophageal and bronchial brachytherapy, but no longer in cervical<br />
carcinoma.<br />
In all these situations radiation physicists will calculate the isodoses<br />
with different algorithms that can change homogeneity and dose<br />
distribution, and a good communication with radiation oncologists will<br />
always be required. New modelbased dose calculation techniques will<br />
change our view <strong>of</strong> the standard dosimetries. A step forward is<br />
needed, years after ICRU 38 and 58, to adapt the prescription doses to<br />
the 3D, even 4D brachytherapy if we consider the changes in volume<br />
between fractions.<br />
: Prescription is a medical decision. 2. We need to use a<br />
common language to compare different series. 3. With one or two<br />
catheters there is a high gradient <strong>of</strong> dose, and distance must be<br />
carefully chosen. 4. With three or more catheters, prescription<br />
should be done to volume. 5. If the target is not visible, modified<br />
Paris system and prescription to an isodose related to the implant<br />
should be used. 6. If target is not well defined by imaging methods,<br />
prescription can be done to volume but it must be compared with<br />
standard prescription to points. 7. If target is well defined,<br />
prescription should always be done to volume but taking into account<br />
the previous experience <strong>of</strong> prescription to points. 8. The tendency is<br />
the prescription to volume (3D) with imaging systems as it is in EBRT.<br />
9. A common policy regarding prescription should be achieved in all<br />
tumoral locations.<br />
<br />
PD119<br />
REALTIME SOURCE POSITION VERIFICATION FOR MRGUIDED SINGLE<br />
FRACTION HDR PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY.<br />
M.A. Moerland 1 , H. de Leeuw 2 , M. van Vulpen 1 , C.J.G. Bakker 2 , P.R.<br />
Seevinck 2<br />
1<br />
U.M.C. Utrecht, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Utrecht, The<br />
Netherlands<br />
2<br />
U.M.C. Utrecht, Image Sciences Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />
: Single fraction HDR brachytherapy as a<br />
monotherapy requires safe dose delivery, e.g. by realtime source<br />
position verification. Since MRI provides superior visualization <strong>of</strong><br />
prostate, tumour and critical <strong>org</strong>ans, an MRIguided single fraction<br />
HDR brachy monotherapy for localized prostate cancer is being<br />
developed in our institute. In a dedicated treatment suite equipped<br />
with an HDR afterloader and a 1.5 T MR scanner, patient treatment<br />
and imaging can be combined. Objects like an Ir192 source in a steel<br />
capsule cause MR image artefacts, which may be exploited to detect<br />
the position <strong>of</strong> the source in the MR image. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this in<br />
vitro study is to investigate the feasibility <strong>of</strong> realtime Ir192 source<br />
position verification using MRI.<br />
: For realtime position verification we applied<br />
the coRASOR (centerout RAdial Sampling OffResonance) technique.<br />
This special MR imaging technique allows signal distortion around a<br />
perturber to be focused into its exact center by applying a specific<br />
frequency <strong>of</strong>fset [1]. We applied the <strong>of</strong>fset during reconstruction <strong>of</strong><br />
the data. An HDR source was introduced in a plastic needle, which<br />
was inserted parallel to B0 in a 7 cm thick inhomogeneous piece <strong>of</strong><br />
porcine tissue. The source consists <strong>of</strong> a nonradioactive Ir192 cylinder<br />
(0.65x3.6 mm) in an AISI 316L steel capsule (0.9x4.5 mm) connected<br />
to a ferromagnetic steel cable (diameter 0.7 mm). The phantom was<br />
imaged on a CT scanner with 1 mm slices at <strong>12</strong>0 kV and 450 mAs for<br />
comparison. Multislice 2D coRASOR imaging was performed on a 1.5T<br />
MR scanner using a large excitation bandwidth (5.4 kHz), field <strong>of</strong> view<br />
192x192 mm 2 , resolution 2 mm isotropic, reconstruction 1 mm, single<br />
coronal and sagittal slice, slice thickness <strong>10</strong> mm, echo time 0.75 ms,<br />
repetition time 2.9 ms, flip angle 20 o , readout bandwidth 890<br />
Hz/voxel, NSA 2, scan duration 2.9 s. The images reconstructed at the<br />
optimal frequency were thresholded and the resulting positive<br />
contrast images were merged with the onresonance acquired images.<br />
MR and CT images were registered using rigid registration.<br />
: Results <strong>of</strong> coRASOR imaging <strong>of</strong> the HDR source in the<br />
inhomogeneous porcine tissue are shown in Figure 1. The high signal<br />
spot in the coRASOR images corresponds within 1 mm to the tip <strong>of</strong><br />
the source, as measured in the registered CT images. The two 2D<br />
images allow tracking <strong>of</strong> the source tip in 3D. Acquisition <strong>of</strong> the 2<br />
orthogonally placed MRI slices was performed within 3 seconds. Off<br />
resonance reconstruction increased the total acquisition and<br />
reconstruction time by less than one second. Hereby the total tracking<br />
could be performed within 4 s, which is within the range <strong>of</strong> the source<br />
dwell times in a single fraction monotherapy HDR prostate treatment.<br />
: coRASOR MR imaging <strong>of</strong> 2 orthogonal slices allows<br />
source tracking within 4 s, making realtime source position<br />
verification in HDR prostate treatment feasible.<br />
[1] P.R. Seevinck et al. MRM, 65:146–156, 2011<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 49<br />
PD<strong>12</strong>0<br />
FIDUCIAL MARKERS IN COMBINED EBRTLDR THERAPY OF PROSTATE<br />
CANCER: INFLUENCE ON LDR DOSE<br />
G. Landry 1 , B. Reniers 1 , L. Lutgens 2 , L. Murrer 3 , H. Afsharpour 4 , D. de<br />
HaasKock 2 , P. Visser 3 , F. van Gils 2 , F. Verhaegen 1<br />
1<br />
MAASTRO clinic, Physics Research, Maastricht, The Netherlands<br />
2<br />
MAASTRO clinic, Radiotherapy, Maastricht, The Netherlands<br />
3<br />
MAASTRO clinic, Clinical Physics, Maastricht, The Netherlands<br />
4<br />
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec, RadioOncologie,<br />
Quebec, Canada<br />
: When performing combined modality<br />
radiotherapy treatment <strong>of</strong> intermediate or highrisk prostate cancer<br />
with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and low dose rate (LDR)<br />
brachytherapy, gold fiducial markers (FM) implanted at the EBRT<br />
stage are present during LDR seed implantation and subsequent dose<br />
delivery. These FM will create dose shadows perturbing the LDR dose<br />
distribution, to a greater extent than in EBRT, given the lower photon<br />
energies. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to perform an initial<br />
investigation into the perturbations <strong>of</strong> the LDR brachytherapy dose<br />
distribution introduced by the presence <strong>of</strong> FM in the prostate, by<br />
investigating phantom and patient cases.<br />
: A virtual water phantom was designed<br />
containing a single FM. Single and multi source scenarios were<br />
investigated by performing Monte Carlo dose calculations, along with<br />
the influence <strong>of</strong> varying orientation and distance <strong>of</strong> the FM with<br />
respect to the sources. Three prostate cancer patients treated with<br />
LDR brachytherapy for a recurrence following external beam<br />
radiotherapy with implanted FM were studied as surrogate cases to<br />
combined EBRTLDR therapy. FM and brachytherapy seeds were<br />
identified on post implant CT scans and Monte Carlo dose calculations<br />
were performed with and without FM. The dosimetric impact <strong>of</strong> the<br />
FM was evaluated by quantifying the magnitude <strong>of</strong> dose shadows and<br />
the volume <strong>of</strong> cold spots for both phantom and patient scenarios.<br />
: Large dose shadows are observed in the single sourceFM<br />
scenarios, and the shadows are dependent on sourceFM distance (see<br />
Fig. 1 AE) and orientation. Large dose reductions are observed at the<br />
distal side <strong>of</strong> FM, while at the proximal side a dose enhancement is<br />
observed (Fig. 1 D). In multi source scenarios, the importance <strong>of</strong><br />
shadows is mitigated, although FM at the periphery <strong>of</strong> the seed<br />
distribution caused underdosage (
S50 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
wall). Conformity Indexes (CI), related to reported air/seroma and<br />
invagination volumes, were also evaluated.<br />
: Lumpectomy cavity volumes averaged 8.3±0.9cc. PTV_EVAL<br />
and PTV volumes averaged 43.2±9.0cc and 49.5±3.8cc, respectively.<br />
V90 values averaged 98.5±1.9% (TG) and 98.0±2.3% (AC) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
PTV_EVAL volume. Similarly, V95 averaged 97.4±2.8% (TG) and<br />
96.5±3.1% (AC), and V<strong>10</strong>0 averaged 95.3±3.4% (TG) and 94.1±3.9%<br />
(AC) across the entire cohort <strong>of</strong> patients. The V150 'hotspots' averaged<br />
24.4±4.7cc (TG) and 23.9±5.4cc (AC), while V200 averaged 14.1±2.9cc<br />
(TG) and 13.8±2.8cc (AC). The average minimum skin distance was<br />
11.9mm, but the applicator was used in patients where the skin<br />
bridge was as low as 1mm. The average maximum skin dose was 76.3%<br />
(TG) and 73.2% (AC) <strong>of</strong> the prescription dose. The average minimum<br />
rib bridge was 15.7mm, with the shortest 20 days) was<br />
3.3%. Prolonged AUR in the first 500 implanted patients was 6.2% vs.<br />
1.1% in the last cohort. The order <strong>of</strong> implant was considered to be a<br />
significant factor (p = 0.0002).<br />
Overall acute RTOG grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 urinary toxicity rates were<br />
<strong>12</strong>.3%, 45.2%, 34.2 % and 8.1%. The rates <strong>of</strong> late RTOG grade 0, 1, 2<br />
and 3 urinary toxicity were 47.5%, 34.25, 15.1% and 3.1%. There were<br />
no acute or late RTOG grade 4 urinary <strong>events</strong>. The rate <strong>of</strong> acute<br />
toxicity (RTOG grade ≥ 2) in the first 500 implanted patients was<br />
51.5% vs. 31.7% in the last cohort. The order <strong>of</strong> implant was<br />
considered to be a significant factor (p
S52 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
regrowth <strong>of</strong> tumor. This might be the result <strong>of</strong> an inadequately<br />
covered target volume. The use <strong>of</strong> MRIguided brachytherapy would<br />
allow for accurate treatment planning due to precise tumor<br />
delineation and catheter reconstruction. To determine the potential<br />
benefit <strong>of</strong> MRIguided brachytherapy for esophageal cancer, we<br />
evaluated the dose distribution <strong>of</strong> the current brachytherapy<br />
technique on MR images.<br />
: 5 patients with inoperable esophageal cancer<br />
were treated with HDR brachytherapy with a dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong><strong>12</strong>Gy in one<br />
fraction. The proximal and distal tumor borders were visualized with<br />
endoscopy and the position <strong>of</strong> the catheter controlled by fluoroscopy.<br />
The dose was prescribed at 1 cm from the middwell position and the<br />
active length encompassed the visible tumor with a 2 cm margin<br />
proximal and distal.<br />
After treatment the applicator and active treatment length were<br />
reconstructed on MR images using the anatomical structures and<br />
reference markers on the Xray images. T2w MR images in transversal,<br />
coronal and sagittal plane were acquired on a 1.5 T scanner<br />
approximately one week before brachytherapy and used to delineate<br />
the tumor (Fig 1a). The reconstructed dose distribution enabled<br />
calculation <strong>of</strong> the dose to 90% <strong>of</strong> the tumor volume (D90%) and the<br />
volume <strong>of</strong> the tumor receiving 95% <strong>of</strong> the prescribed dose (V95%).<br />
Furthermore, the distance between the borders <strong>of</strong> the tumor and the<br />
<strong>10</strong>0% isodoseline along the applicator was measured to determine the<br />
actual treatment margin.<br />
: For all patients the extension <strong>of</strong> the tumor documented by<br />
fluoroscopy was smaller than the tumor length delineated on the MR<br />
images (Table 1). The intended treatment margin <strong>of</strong> 2 cm was only<br />
reached for 2 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>10</strong> tumor borders. For two patients the <strong>10</strong>0%<br />
isodoseline was on the distal border <strong>of</strong> the tumor and one patient<br />
even demonstrated 7 mm <strong>of</strong> mucosal tumor to be outside the <strong>10</strong>0%<br />
isodoseline (Fig 1 b). Due to the axial tumor extension beyond 1 cm,<br />
the tumor volume was underdosaged in all patients with an average<br />
V95% <strong>of</strong> 50% and D90% <strong>of</strong> 6.1 Gy (Table 1).<br />
Table 1: Tumor length along the applicator as documented on the X<br />
ray images and delineated on the MR images, the treatment margins<br />
and dose coverage based on the reconstructed dose distribution on<br />
the MR images.<br />
Patient tumor<br />
length<br />
on Xray<br />
(mm)<br />
tumor<br />
length<br />
on MRI<br />
(mm)<br />
Proximal margin<br />
(mm)<br />
Distal<br />
margin<br />
(mm)<br />
V95% D90%<br />
(%) (Gy)<br />
1 70 90 24 0 63 7.7<br />
2 <strong>10</strong>0 114 15 0 25 3.7<br />
3 70 89 <strong>10</strong> 23 53 7.3<br />
4 60 90 7 16 38 4.0<br />
5 60 85 <strong>12</strong> 9 69 8.0<br />
: Endoscopic/Xray based brachytherapy for esophageal<br />
cancer seems to underestimate the extension <strong>of</strong> the mucosal tumor.<br />
Even with a large treatment margin <strong>of</strong> 2 cm underdosage <strong>of</strong> the<br />
mucosal tumor occurs. Accurate MRIguided brachytherapy, allowing<br />
for conformal treatment planning with a small margin, has the<br />
potential to improve tumor coverage while sparing healthy esophageal<br />
wall along the length direction.<br />
PD<strong>12</strong>7<br />
VAGINAL BRACHYTHERAPY FOR INTERMEDIATE RISK ENDOMETRIAL<br />
CARCINOMA FROM SINGLE INSTITUTION<br />
A. Jhingran 1 , A. Klopp 1 , P. Allen 1 , P. Soliman 1 , C. Levenback 1 , J.<br />
Brown 1 , P. Ramirez 1 , P. Eifel 1<br />
1<br />
U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology Unit <strong>12</strong>02,<br />
Houston TX, USA<br />
: To review the outcome and patterns <strong>of</strong> recurrence for<br />
patients treated with postoperative vaginal apex brachytherapy for<br />
intermediaterisk endometrial cancer.<br />
: Two hundred and fortyfive patients with<br />
endometrial carcinoma were treated from 4/199911/2009 with<br />
adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy alone +/ chemotherapy. All patients<br />
were treated using a Delclos dome cylinder to a total dose <strong>of</strong> 30 Gy in<br />
5 fractions prescribed to the vaginal surface; only the apex <strong>of</strong> the<br />
vagina was treated, usually with 4 dwell positions. The mean follow<br />
up <strong>of</strong> the patients was 57 months (range 1 157 months). The median<br />
age <strong>of</strong> the patients was 63 yrs. (range 3189 yrs.). All patients had a<br />
TAH/BSO and most had lymph node sampling. Nineteen percent<br />
(46/245) <strong>of</strong> patients received adjuvant chemotherapy consisting <strong>of</strong><br />
carboplatin, taxol or a combination <strong>of</strong> the two.<br />
: Sixtyseven percent (164/245) <strong>of</strong> the patients had<br />
endometrioid adenocarcinoma, 14% (34/245) had serous carcinoma,<br />
9% (21/245) had clear cell carcinoma and <strong>10</strong>% (24/245) had MMMT.<br />
Two patients had other histologies. Of the patients with<br />
adenocarcinoma, 7% (11/164) had grade 1 disease, 72% (119/164) had<br />
grade 2 disease and 21% (34/164) had grade 3 disease. Most patients<br />
had FIGO 1988 stage I (75%, 184/245), however, 15% (37/245) had<br />
stage II and <strong>10</strong>% (24/245) had stage III. Lymph vascular space invasion<br />
was seen in 42% (<strong>10</strong>1/245) <strong>of</strong> the specimens.<br />
At 4 years, the rates <strong>of</strong> overall survival (OS), disease free survival<br />
(DFS) and vaginal control (VC) for 245 patients were 88%, 86% and<br />
95%, respectively. There were 13 vaginal recurrences, 7 patients<br />
recurred at the apex and 6 patients recurred distal to the radiated<br />
vagina. Of the 6 patients that recurred distally, 4 were salvaged with<br />
radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Of the apical recurrences, only<br />
one patient was salvaged with surgery and chemotherapy. Most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
patients who had apical recurrences had large pelvic masses or distant<br />
metastasis at the same time as the apical recurrence. Factors that<br />
correlated with poorer DFS were LVSI (p=0.025), grade 3 (p=0.002),<br />
stage III (p=0.005), and MMMT/serous histology (p < 0.0001). Grade 3<br />
histology (p = 0.05) and LVSI (p = 0.02) predicted for vaginal<br />
recurrence.<br />
: Excellent vaginal control was achieved while treating<br />
only the vaginal apex with brachytherapy in this group <strong>of</strong> patients<br />
with endometrial carcinoma. Recurrences distal to the area <strong>of</strong><br />
treatment are rare and <strong>of</strong>ten can be successfully salvaged. For<br />
patients with grade 3 tumors the addition <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy should be<br />
explored to try to achieve better local control and diseasefree<br />
survival.<br />
PD<strong>12</strong>8<br />
DOSE CONTRIBUTION TO INVOLVED PELVIC NODES WITH 3D<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CERVIX CANCER; COMPARISON OF TWO CANCER<br />
CENTERS<br />
W. van den Bos 1 , L. Velema 2 , S. Beriwal 3 , A.A.C. de Leeuw 1 , I.M.<br />
JürgenliemkSchulz 1<br />
1<br />
U.M.C. Utrecht, Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />
2<br />
Erasmus Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, The<br />
Netherlands<br />
3<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology,<br />
Pittsburgh, USA<br />
: Imageguided brachytherapy (IGBT) has<br />
beenincreasingly adopted in the treatment <strong>of</strong> advanced cervical<br />
cancer. Mainadvantage is the doseoptimization to target volumes<br />
with reduced dose tocritical <strong>org</strong>ans. It also <strong>of</strong>fers the opportunity to<br />
measure the dose to pelviclymph nodes visible on T2 weighted MR<br />
images with a short axis diameter <strong>of</strong> ≥ 5mm (pLNN). The goal <strong>of</strong> this<br />
study was to measure and compare the pLNN dose fromtwo different<br />
cancer centers.<br />
: Twentyseven and fifteen patients with<br />
cervical cancer and pLNNtreated with HDRIGBT and PDRIGBT<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 53<br />
respectively at two different institutions wereanalyzed. HDRIGBT<br />
dose was 5.06.0 Gy x five fractions using CT/MRI<br />
compatibletandem/ring applicator with intracavitary technique. PDR<br />
IGBT dose was 32x60cGy x two fractions using Utrechttandem/ovoid<br />
applicator with intracavitary/interstitial technique. PLNN seenon<br />
pretreatment PET/CT or MRI were contoured on all BTplans. D90<br />
(dose to 90%<strong>of</strong> each node volume) was calculated from dosevolume<br />
histograms. Both theabsolute dose and percentage <strong>of</strong> prescription<br />
dose to the node volume wascalculated for each fraction. For each<br />
involved node the total dose for allfractions was calculated,<br />
expressed in biological equivalent doses <strong>of</strong> 2 Gyfractions (EQD2). The<br />
D90 as percentage <strong>of</strong> prescription dose and as EQD2 werecompared.<br />
: 57(HDR) vs. 40 (PDR) pLNN were contoured. In the HDR and<br />
PDR groups, the nodaldistributions were 4 vs. 1 in common iliac region<br />
(CI), 14 vs. 11 in internaliliac region (II), 31 vs. 18 in external iliac (EI)<br />
region 8 vs. 5 in obturatorregion (OB) and 0 vs 5<br />
inparametrial/miscellaneous area. The mean percentage <strong>of</strong> dose to<br />
the nodes was<strong>10</strong>.8% (5.725.1 %) vs. 20.5% (6.893.3%) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
prescribed dose to HRCTV inthe two centers, respectively (p
S54 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
the med group compared to lat; for N0 med: 77.8% vs. lat: 85.5%, p =<br />
0.0038.<br />
: The use <strong>of</strong> a HDR source in boosting the primary tumour<br />
site after external beam radiotherapy with a dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> Gy in 1<br />
fraction is a routine procedure. The local relapse rate and survival<br />
data are very similar to those reported in literature. More than 95% <strong>of</strong><br />
the patients live with their preserved breast. When comparing two<br />
time periods, an improvement both in the local recurrence rate and<br />
the disease free survival rate occurred.<br />
We therefore hypothesize that after BCS ± ST and RT, patients with<br />
medial tumour locations are at higher risk, in particular in N0<br />
patients. The reason may lie in the fact that the pathologic stage <strong>of</strong><br />
the IMC is unknown, and that patients with medial tumour locations<br />
and negative axillary nodes neither received radiation treatment to<br />
IMC nodes nor systemic therapy, while in lateral tumours all patients<br />
with positive axillary nodes underwent systemic therapy and (in part)<br />
supraclavicular irradiation.<br />
Thorough diagnostic examination and more aggressive treatments are<br />
to be considered for patients with medial tumour location and axillary<br />
N0 status.<br />
OC132<br />
EXCELLENT COSMESIS AFTER APBI: DOES DOSE TO THE DERMAL<br />
VOLUME PROVIDE A BETTER PREDICTIVE CONSTRAINT THAN SKIN<br />
DMAX?<br />
R. Vera 1 , D. Todor 1 , N. Bennion 1 , N. Mukhopadyay 2 , D.W. Arthur 1<br />
1<br />
Virginia Commonwealth University, Radiation Oncology, Richmond,<br />
USA<br />
2<br />
Virginia Commonwealth University, Biostatistics, Richmond, USA<br />
: Our goal was identify an anatomic structure and<br />
its associated dosevolume constraints that correlate with excellent<br />
longterm cosmesis for breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant<br />
accelerated partial breast radiation (APBI) delivered with<br />
brachytherapy. A comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> TG43 and Acuros variables<br />
was done to identify the best discriminator <strong>of</strong> cosmetic outcome.<br />
: From 20002005, 45 patients, treated with<br />
balloon and multicatheter brachytherapy, had dosevolume histogram<br />
(DVH) reconstruction that was electronically available. Clinical follow<br />
up was at regular intervals and included history, physical exam, and<br />
mammography. Overall cosmesis was a physiciangraded evaluation<br />
using the Harvard scale from excellent, good, fair or poor. Additional<br />
toxicities, in the form <strong>of</strong> hyperpigmentation, telangectasia, and<br />
fibrosis, were graded on the RTOG scale <strong>of</strong> 04. These patients were<br />
further divided into two populations <strong>of</strong> acceptable cosmesis (AC) and<br />
unacceptable cosmesis (UC). The AC group included patients who had<br />
excellent and good overall cosmesis without any other described<br />
toxicity. The UC group consisted <strong>of</strong> 5 patients with either a fair or<br />
poor overall cosmesis, or a good overall cosmesis and documented<br />
toxicity <strong>of</strong> at least grade 1 hyperpigmentation, telangectasia, or<br />
fibrosis.<br />
In an attempt to include vascular networks to the skin, a new dermal<br />
structure, extending from the skin surface to a 5mm depth, was<br />
created for each plan. Dose rate, maximum skin surface dose, V90,<br />
V<strong>10</strong>0, V150 and V200 to this dermal structure was evaluated and<br />
analyzed. A tree regression analysis was used to compare the<br />
predictative capabilities <strong>of</strong> TG43 and Acuros planning models.<br />
: For the 45 patients with available DVH analysis, there was a<br />
median follow up <strong>of</strong> 35.2 months. The AC group had a mean Dmax to<br />
the skin surface <strong>of</strong> 2.66Gy (SD= 0.47Gy), and the UC group had a mean<br />
Dmax to the skin surface <strong>of</strong> 2.98Gy (SD= 1.01Gy). Based on statistical<br />
analysis, the maximum dose to skin surface did not differentiate<br />
between the two groups. The mean dermal V90 for the AC group was<br />
4cc (SD=2.6cc), and the mean dermal V90 for the UC was 7cc (SD<br />
2.4cc).<br />
The dermal V90 distinguished between the two groups with statistical<br />
significance. Moreover, a threshold value for a dermal V90 <strong>of</strong>
S56 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
Ge<strong>org</strong>ia, USA<br />
5<br />
Boca Raton Community Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Boca Raton<br />
Florida, USA<br />
6<br />
Texas Cancer Clinic, Radiation Oncology, San Antonio Texas, USA<br />
7<br />
First Coast Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Jacksonville Florida, USA<br />
8<br />
Arizona Breast Cancer Specialists, Radiation Oncology, Phoenix<br />
Arizona, USA<br />
9<br />
Putnam Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, Palatka Florida, USA<br />
: Noninvasive imageguided breast brachytherapy<br />
(NIBB) is a mammographybased (AccuBoost ® , Billerica, MA),<br />
brachytherapy system whereby the treatment applicators are<br />
centered on the planning target volume (PTV) to direct 192 Ir emissions<br />
along orthogonal axes. This study reports early clinical results on the<br />
use <strong>of</strong> NIBB for breast tumor bed boost with external beam whole<br />
breast radiation therapy (WBRT) as part <strong>of</strong> postlumpectomy<br />
radiation.<br />
: A privacyencrypted online data registry was<br />
created to collect information from 9 independent academic and<br />
communitybased institutions. Data were collected from consecutive<br />
247 individual women with early stage breast cancer (59% invasive)<br />
after breast conserving surgery, who received adjuvant WBRT (mean<br />
47.9Gy in 26±2 fractions) and tumor bed boost (mean <strong>12</strong>.6Gy in 6±2<br />
fractions) with NIBB between Jun 2007 and Dec 2011. NIBB was<br />
delivered before, during, or after WBRT in 46%, 48%, or 5% <strong>of</strong> pts. Pt<br />
age and tumor size ranged from 1988yr and 0.15cm. Toxicity and<br />
cosmesis were evaluated after radiation therapy and graded according<br />
to the Common Toxicity Criteria (v3.0) and the Harvard scale. Mean<br />
follow up was 7 months (range 0.2542).<br />
: There were no locoregional recurrences in the cohort. There<br />
was no association noted <strong>of</strong> cosmetic outcomes with type <strong>of</strong> surgery<br />
(2% oncoplasty, 74% standard or 24% unknown), presence <strong>of</strong> re<br />
excision (29%), presence <strong>of</strong> tumor bed clips (42%) or tumor size. Grade<br />
<strong>12</strong> skin toxicity was observed in 44%, 36%, and 16% during the acute<br />
(13wks), intermediate (426 wks), and lateintermediate (>26wks)<br />
periods. There was no grade 35 skin toxicity event and no poor<br />
cosmesis reports. Overall, cosmeses were excellent, good, fair in 50%,<br />
46%, and 4% (Figure).<br />
Interval time (months)<br />
Cosmesis (CTC v3.0) 0 to1 >1 to 6 >6 to <strong>12</strong> ><strong>12</strong><br />
Fair (%) 0 7 3 6<br />
Good (%) 75 41 54 29<br />
Excellent (%) 25 52 43 65<br />
: These data support that NIBB can be consistently<br />
implemented with minimal shortterm toxicity and no evidence <strong>of</strong><br />
early local failure in both community and academic settings. The<br />
overall cosmetic outcome appears to be stable beyond <strong>12</strong> months<br />
(Table).<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
137<br />
REPEAT BREAST CONSERVATION THERAPY: USA EXPERIENCE<br />
R. Patel<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin, School <strong>of</strong> Medicine and Public Health,<br />
Madison, USA<br />
Abstract not received<br />
138<br />
SECOND CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT FOR IPSILATERAL BREAST CANCER<br />
RECURRENCE: GECESTRO BREAST WG STUDY<br />
J. HannounLevi 1 , D. KauerDorner 2 , J. Gal 3 , V. Strnad 4 , P. Nieh<strong>of</strong>f 5 , K.<br />
Loessl 6 , G. Kovacs 7 , E. Van Limbergen 8 , C. Polgar 9<br />
1<br />
Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Radiation Oncology, Nice, France<br />
2<br />
Medical University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria<br />
3<br />
Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Biostatistic Unit, Nice, France<br />
4<br />
University ErlangenNuremberg, Radiation Oncology, Erlangen,<br />
Germany<br />
5<br />
University Hospital SH, Radiation Oncology, Kiel, Germany<br />
6<br />
University Hospital Bernes, Radiation Oncology, Bernes, Switzerland<br />
7<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Luebeck and University Hospital <strong>of</strong> SchleswigHolstein,<br />
Radiation Oncology, Luebeck, Germany<br />
8<br />
University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Radiation Oncology, Leuven,<br />
Belgium<br />
9<br />
National Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Budapest,<br />
Hungary<br />
In case <strong>of</strong> ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence (IBCR), radical<br />
mastectomy represents the treatment option frequently proposed to<br />
the patient. A second conservative treatment has been proposed using<br />
either lumpectomy alone or associated with a second irradiation <strong>of</strong><br />
the tumor bed. However, in both clinical situations, the pro<strong>of</strong> level <strong>of</strong><br />
such therapeutic approaches remains low, based on casedseries or<br />
retrospective studies (level C).<br />
In order to analyze the clinical outcome <strong>of</strong> a second conservative<br />
treatment (SCT) using lumpectomy and multicatheter interstitial<br />
brachytherapy (MIB) for IBCR, the GECESTRO Breast Working Group<br />
retrospectively analyzed the results <strong>of</strong> 217 patients (pts) with an IBCR<br />
treated between 09/2000 and 09/20<strong>10</strong> in 8 European institutions by<br />
lumpectomy and MIB (low LDR, pulse – PDR, or highdose rate <br />
HDR). Survival rates without 2 nd local and metastatic progression,<br />
disease free survival (DFS) and specific and overall survivals were<br />
analyzed as well as late tissue breast complications and cosmetic<br />
results. Dosimetric data were reported according to the dose rate<br />
used. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to find<br />
local, metastatic and/or DFS progression prognostic factors.<br />
With a median followup <strong>of</strong> 14.5 years [3.538.2] and 3.9 years [1.1<br />
<strong>10</strong>.3] from primary tumour and IBCR respectively and a median delay<br />
<strong>of</strong> 9.4 years [1.135.4] between primary and IBCR, 20.7% <strong>of</strong> the local<br />
recurrence were observed at distance from the primary tumour.<br />
Median tumour sizes were 15 mm [160] and 11 mm [140] for the<br />
primary and IBCR respectively. Sixteen percent <strong>of</strong> the patients<br />
presented a positive lymph node dissection for the primary tumour<br />
while 69.1% did not undergo new axillary dissection at the time <strong>of</strong><br />
IBCR. Median radiotherapy dose for the primary was 56 Gy [3069.6].<br />
Positive hormonal receptor status for IBCR was 72.8% while 65% and<br />
19.8% received hormonal and chemotherapy respectively as adjuvant<br />
therapy for the IBCR. MIB for IBCR used LDR (<strong>12</strong>.4%), PDR (40.6%) and<br />
HDR (47%) with a median delivered dose <strong>of</strong> 46 Gy [3055], 50.4 Gy [49<br />
50] and 32 Gy [2236] for LDR, PDR and HDR respectively. Five and <strong>10</strong><br />
year actuarial 2 nd local recurrence rates were 5.6% [1.59.5] and 7.2%<br />
[2.1<strong>12</strong>.1] respectively. Five and <strong>10</strong>year actuarial metastatic<br />
recurrence rates were 9.6% [5.715.2] and 19.1% [7.828.3]<br />
respectively. Five and <strong>10</strong>year actuarial DFS rates were 84.6% [78.9<br />
90.6] and 77.2% [67.588.3] respectively. Five and <strong>10</strong>year actuarial<br />
overall/specific survival rates were 88.7% [83.194.8] and 76.4% [66.9<br />
87.3] respectively. One hundred and forty one pts developed 193<br />
complications. Fibrosis was the most frequent complication with 11%<br />
<strong>of</strong> G34 complications. Cosmetic result was jugged as excellent/good<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 57<br />
in 85%. Univariate and Multivariate analysis for prognostic factors <strong>of</strong><br />
2 nd local recurrence, metastatic recurrence and DFS are reported in<br />
the table 1. The results <strong>of</strong> this study suggest that in case <strong>of</strong> IBCR, a<br />
SCT combining lumpectomy plus MIB is feasible with an overall<br />
survival rate at least equivalent to those obtain after salvage<br />
mastectomy. The rate <strong>of</strong> complication remains acceptable with<br />
encouraging cosmetic results.<br />
The data provided by the literature analysis suggest that the rate <strong>of</strong><br />
second local recurrence is about <strong>10</strong>% (ranged from 3 to 32%), about<br />
25% (ranged from 7 to 36%) and about <strong>10</strong>% (ranged from 2 to 26%),<br />
after salvage mastectomy, salvage lumpectomy alone or combined<br />
with a second irradiation <strong>of</strong> the tumor bed respectively. However, the<br />
5year overall survival rates after salvage mastectomy and SCT seem<br />
to be equivalent (≈ 75%) mainly influenced by distant metastatic<br />
progression.<br />
To go forward in terms <strong>of</strong> Evidence Based Medicine, different options<br />
can be discussed such as Phase III or II randomized trials comparing<br />
salvage mastectomy versus SCT, retrospective studies based on a<br />
matchedpair analysis or observatory studies. All <strong>of</strong> the study designs<br />
have their own advantages and disadvantages and need to be carefully<br />
analyzed to be able to propose new treatment options for women who<br />
experience an IBCR.<br />
<br />
OC139<br />
A FAST AND ACCURATE GPUBASED PRIMARY+SCATTER ALGORITHM FOR<br />
LDRBRACHYTHERAPY<br />
A. Bourque 1 , P. Després 1 , L. Beaulieu 1<br />
1<br />
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, L'HôtelDieu de Québec,<br />
Radiation Oncology, Quebec, Canada<br />
: To improve the accuracy while maintaining fast<br />
execution <strong>of</strong> TG43 dose calculations with a fast GPUbased ray<br />
tracing algorithm integrating a point to point scatter dose kernel that<br />
handles medium heterogeneities.<br />
: The method developed derives from the TG<br />
43 formalism. An incremental version <strong>of</strong> Siddons’s raytracing<br />
algorithm is first used to compute radiological distances from sources<br />
to dose calculation points. Then, a regular TG43 dose calculation is<br />
performed, with an added correction factor for medium attenuation.<br />
Finally, a scatter dose kernel spread the SCERMA energy value around<br />
every voxel based on the Thompson approximation <strong>of</strong> the Compton<br />
scattering. Interseed attenuation (ISA) effects and the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
numerous materials on dosimetry were assessed for both regular and<br />
modified TG43 calculations in virtual phantom geometries, and<br />
compared to Monte Carlo (MC) simulations with GEANT4, acting here<br />
as a gold standard. The <strong>12</strong>5 I SelectSeed from Nucletron was used for<br />
validation on a NVIDIA Tesla C2050 GPU. Calculations were tested for<br />
geometries <strong>of</strong> 20x20x20cm 3 and a fine resolution with voxels <strong>of</strong> 1mm 3 .<br />
: An execution time <strong>of</strong> 2.3 s/seed was obtained, representing<br />
an acceleration factor (AF) <strong>of</strong> 5427x over a regular CPU<br />
implementation (Table 1). We expect further reduction <strong>of</strong> execution<br />
time to less than one second per seed for clinical geometries. With a<br />
1cm range for scatter dose, the modified TG43 algorithm was able to<br />
reduce ISA errors from 45% to less than <strong>10</strong>% for some dose calculation<br />
points. The TG43 algorithm improved the accuracy <strong>of</strong> dose deposited<br />
through various materials. At 3cm from the seed, dose corrections <strong>of</strong><br />
up to 2Gy, corresponding to errors <strong>of</strong> more than <strong>10</strong>0%, were obtained<br />
for adipose and cortical bone tissues. Furthermore, considering dose<br />
to medium, the D95 deviation with MC was reduced by 4% in a 56cc<br />
calcified prostate implant simulation. The relative dose around every<br />
calcification was adequately corrected to an error less than 5% (Figure<br />
1), which is within uncertainties conceded by the TG43 formalism.<br />
Stage<br />
Execution time on<br />
CPU<br />
(s/seed)<br />
Execution time on<br />
GPU<br />
(s/seed)<br />
Raytracing algorithm 3366 0.5 6732<br />
Primary dose calculation 0.428 0.6x<strong>10</strong> 3 713<br />
Scattered<br />
calculation<br />
dose<br />
9117 1.8 5065<br />
Total dose calculation <strong>12</strong>483 2.3 5427<br />
Monte Carlo simulation<br />
11520<br />
(2E9 γ)<br />
Table 1 Acceleration factor (AF) for every step in the improved TG<br />
43 dose calculation<br />
: TG43 dose calculations were improved with a modified<br />
algorithm integrating attenuation and scatter corrections while<br />
maintaining fast executions. This algorithm still considers the medium<br />
to be homogeneous for scattered radiation and the range is<br />
underestimated to maintain clinically compatible execution times.<br />
Future work will address these issues to further increase accuracy <strong>of</strong><br />
the dosimetries.<br />
OC140<br />
INFLUENCE OF HIGH ATOMIC NUMBER ELEMENTS IN HUMAN TISSUE IN<br />
DOSIMETRY FOR LOW ENERGY PHOTON BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
S.A. White 1 , G. Landry 1 , F. Van GIls 1 , F. Verhaegen 1 , B. Reniers 1<br />
1 Maastricht University Medical Center, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />
Oncology (MAASTRO) GROW School for Oncology and Developmental<br />
Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands<br />
: Low energy brachytherapy sources such as I<strong>12</strong>5,<br />
Pd<strong>10</strong>3 and electronic brachytherapy sources (EBS) interact with<br />
AF
S58 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
tissue via the photoelectric effect, which is highly dependant on<br />
atomic number (Z) <strong>of</strong> the tissue. Tissue is composed mostly <strong>of</strong> H, C, N,<br />
and O with higher Z trace elements (weight fraction below 1%), like<br />
Na, P and K. The amount <strong>of</strong> trace element varies not only from tissue<br />
to tissue but also from person to person. Cancerous tissue has shown a<br />
tendency to contain a higher concentration <strong>of</strong> trace elements<br />
compared to healthy tissue (Kwiatek et al., 2005). We aimed to<br />
determine the dosimetric impact <strong>of</strong> these trace elements in human<br />
tissues for low energy photon sources used in brachytherapy.<br />
: Monte Carlo dose calculations were used to<br />
investigate the dosimetric effect <strong>of</strong> trace elements present in normal<br />
and cancerous human tissues. The effect <strong>of</strong> individual traces (atomic<br />
number Z=11 to 30) was simulated in a commonly cited healthy s<strong>of</strong>t<br />
tissue composition (Woodard and White, 1986) for 3 low energy<br />
sources where a fixed concentration (0.5% w/w) <strong>of</strong> each trace<br />
element was added. Three other tissue types (prostate, adipose and<br />
mammary gland) were also simulated with each <strong>of</strong> their trace<br />
components excluded alternately to quantify the contribution <strong>of</strong> each<br />
trace to the dose distribution. Finally, the dose differences between<br />
cancerous and healthy prostate tissue compositions were calculated,<br />
using more precise trace compositions(Kwiatek et al., 2005). All<br />
results were compared against a zerotrace tissue composition (HCNO<br />
only). All calculations were reported as dose to medium.<br />
: The presence <strong>of</strong> traces in a tissue produces a difference in<br />
the dose pr<strong>of</strong>ile versus distance from the source that is dependent on<br />
Z, the trace concentration and the source type. Pd<strong>10</strong>3 was the most<br />
sensitive source to concentration change, while the EBS was the least.<br />
LowZ traces (Na) had a negligible effect (3%). There is a considerable<br />
difference in the dose pr<strong>of</strong>ile between cancerous and healthy prostate<br />
(figure 1).<br />
: Trace elements have a nonnegligible effect on the dose<br />
in tissues irradiated with low energy photon sources. This study<br />
underlines the need for further investigation into accurate<br />
determination <strong>of</strong> the trace composition <strong>of</strong> tissues associated with low<br />
energy brachytherapy. Alternatively, trace elements could be<br />
incorporated as a source <strong>of</strong> uncertainty in dose calculations.<br />
References:<br />
Kwiatek W M, Banas A, Gajda M, Galka M, Pawlicki B, Falkenberg G<br />
and Cichocki T 2005 Cancerous tissues analyzed by SRIXE Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Alloys and Compounds 401 17377<br />
Woodard H Q and White D R 1986 The composition <strong>of</strong> body tissues Br J<br />
Radiol 59 <strong>12</strong>0918<br />
OC141<br />
QUANTIFYING THE INTERSOURCE ATTENUATION IN A DUALSOURCE<br />
HDR/PDR AFTERLOADER TREATMENT UNIT<br />
M. Plamondon 1 , L. Beaulieu 1<br />
1<br />
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Département de Radio<br />
oncologie, Québec, Canada<br />
: Much discussions are ongoing in the community<br />
on the commercial availability <strong>of</strong> HDR (high dose rate) afterloaders<br />
which can drive two sources simultaneously, reducing the duration <strong>of</strong><br />
treatments up to a factor 2. The sourcesource and sourcecable<br />
attenuations are not taken into account by current planning systems.<br />
The purpose <strong>of</strong> this work is to try and characterize this effect and its<br />
overall impact on clinically relevant treatment configurations.<br />
: An Ir192 Flexitron source is modeled in<br />
GEANT4 and its dose pr<strong>of</strong>ile in water is evaluated in a grid up to <strong>10</strong><br />
cm. A second source is placed parallel at various distances in order to<br />
quantify the attenuation due to its presence. This pedagogical case is<br />
then transposed to a typical prostate treatment planning. Various<br />
catheter loading patterns (using an actual clinical HDR prostate<br />
geometry) are simulated and compared to the nominal treatment<br />
using a single source. The worst (the two sources always travelling in<br />
two closely located catheters) and best (two sources far from each<br />
other) case scenarios give a respective estimate <strong>of</strong> the upper and<br />
lower bounds <strong>of</strong> the deviations. A measure proportional to the dwell<br />
times and R 2 , where R is the intersource separation, is used to<br />
determine these configurations. Random and minimal deadtime<br />
configurations are also studied for comparison.<br />
: Figure 1 shows the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the deposited energy for inter<br />
source separations ranging from 5 to 20 mm. A maximal effect <strong>of</strong> the<br />
order <strong>of</strong> 20% is observed at small distance and a shadow region with at<br />
least <strong>10</strong>% decrease extends up to <strong>10</strong> cm. A similar study considering a<br />
parallel steel cable instead shows the same behavior but with an<br />
initial dropping <strong>of</strong> less than <strong>10</strong>%. The global impact on actual<br />
treatments is obtained by superimposing the contributions from<br />
catheter pairs simulating the dualsource loading. No significant<br />
deviation is observed in all aforementioned configurations except the<br />
worst case scenario. In that case, a narrow region showing a 5 mm. These effects become negligible<br />
in reallife treatments when source insertions in nearby catheters is<br />
avoided.<br />
OC142<br />
DOSIMETRY FOR HDR HEAD AND NECK BRACHYTHERAPY PATIENTS<br />
USING A GRIDBASED BOLTZMANN SOLVER<br />
F. Siebert 1 , S. Wolf 1 , G. Kovacs 2<br />
1<br />
University Hospital SH Campus Kiel, Radiotherapy, Kiel, Germany<br />
2<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Luebeck and University Hospital <strong>of</strong> SchleswigHolstein,<br />
<strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Luebeck, Germany<br />
: The aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to compare dosimetric<br />
results <strong>of</strong> gridbased Boltzmann solver (GBBS) calculations with<br />
treatment plans computed by the TG43 formalism for high dose rate<br />
(HDR) head and neck brachytherapy (BT) patients. The expected<br />
differences between the standard TG43 and the GBBS dose<br />
calculations, particularly in the head and neck region, is due to<br />
reduced backscattering effects and bony structures close to the<br />
catheter locations. The GBBS uses the electron densities <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 59<br />
computed tomography (CT) scans and is able to take tissue<br />
heterogeneities into account.<br />
: For this study CTbased 3D BT treatment<br />
plans <strong>of</strong> 49 head and neck patients were analyzed. The patient cohort<br />
(15 female, 34 male) was treated with an HDR VariSource afterloader<br />
(Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) between 2001 and 2009 using<br />
an Ir192 source. A single dose <strong>of</strong> 2.5 Gy was applied to each patient.<br />
The mean age <strong>of</strong> the patients was 57.1 years and the mean plastic<br />
catheters used was 5.1 (SD=2). The diagnoses comprised mainly floor<br />
<strong>of</strong> mouth, larynx, and parotis carcinoma. The patient’s treatment<br />
plans were calculated with the BrachyVision v8.8 (Varian Medical<br />
S<strong>of</strong>tware, Palo Alto, CA) s<strong>of</strong>tware using the TG43 formalism and the<br />
commercial GBBS Acuros module <strong>of</strong> BrachyVision.<br />
The dosimetric indices D90, V<strong>10</strong>0, V150, as well as the dose<br />
homogeneity index (DHI) were evaluated and compared between the<br />
two dose calculation methods. Due to the fact that no target outline<br />
could be clinically identified in many cases, the <strong>10</strong>0% prescription<br />
dose outline <strong>of</strong> the TG43 calculation was converted into a 3D contour<br />
and used as an artificial CTV.<br />
: The collected data are presented in table 1. Median D90 and<br />
V<strong>10</strong>0 for TG43 calculation are about 3% higher than for GBBS. The<br />
V150 dose parameter shows a 1.6% increase from GBBS to TG43.<br />
Nevertheless, these are median parameters and clinical assessment<br />
must be performed individually for each patient. The fluctuations <strong>of</strong><br />
the minimum and maximum values <strong>of</strong> the dose parameters are<br />
remarkably higher for the GBBS than for the TG43 calculations. The<br />
dosehomogeneity index DHI is almost constant for both calculation<br />
methods used in this study. An example isodose distribution for both<br />
calculation methods is demonstrated in figure 1.<br />
: The presence <strong>of</strong> air and bony structures close to the<br />
target volume in head and neck HDR BT implants affects results <strong>of</strong><br />
dosimetric calculations <strong>of</strong> gridbased Boltzmann solver techniques.<br />
The extend at which this impacts prescription doses or the<br />
assessments <strong>of</strong> toxicities is still unknown at this time.<br />
OC143<br />
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT FRACTIONATION SCHEDULES IN HDR<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY AS MONOTHERAPY FOR LOWRISK PROSTATE CANCER<br />
P. Mavroidis 1 , N. Milickovic 2 , N. Tselis 3 , Z. Katsilieri 2 , V. Kefala 2 , N.<br />
Zamboglou 3 , D. Baltas 2<br />
1<br />
Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Medical Radiation<br />
Physics, Stockholm, Sweden<br />
2<br />
Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Strahlenklinik Medical Physics &<br />
Engineering, Offenbach, Germany<br />
3<br />
Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Strahlenklinik, Offenbach, Germany<br />
: The selection <strong>of</strong> a proper fractionation scheme is<br />
still an issue <strong>of</strong> debate when moving towards to less fractions <strong>of</strong> HDR<br />
brachytherapy as monotherapy for lowrisk prostate cancer. The aim<br />
<strong>of</strong> the present study is the investigation <strong>of</strong> different fractionation<br />
schemes in order to estimate their clinical impact. For this purpose,<br />
widely applied radiobiological models and dosimetric measures are<br />
employed in order to associate their results with clinical findings.<br />
: The dose distributions <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong> clinical HDR<br />
brachytherapy implants for prostate that were produced by an inverse<br />
optimization algorithm (HIPO) are evaluated regarding different<br />
fractionation schedules. The fractionation schedules that are<br />
compared are: a) 1 fraction <strong>of</strong> 20 Gy; b) 2 fractions <strong>of</strong> 14 Gy; c) 3<br />
fractions <strong>of</strong> 11 Gy; and d) 4 fractions <strong>of</strong> 9.5 Gy. These fractionation<br />
schemes have been previously found to be equivalent based on the<br />
BED for the prescription dose levels. The quality <strong>of</strong> the different<br />
fractionation schemes was evaluated by examining common dose<br />
volume indices for the prostate and the <strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OARs). Their<br />
clinical effectiveness was estimated through the complicationfree<br />
tumor control probability, P+, the biologically effective uniform dose<br />
(BEUD), which were calculated using the Poisson and the relative<br />
seriality models, and the generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD)<br />
index.<br />
: For the different fractionation schemes examined, the tumor<br />
control probabilities are 98.2% in 1x20Gy, 98.6% in 2x14Gy, 97.6% in<br />
3x11Gy and 98.0% in 4x9.5Gy. Similarly, the corresponding total<br />
normal tissue complication probabilities are 9.3% in 1x20Gy, 14.9% in<br />
2x14Gy, 11.3% in 3x11Gy and 16.0% in 4x9.5Gy. Finally, the<br />
complicationfree tumor control probabilities are 89.0% in 1x20Gy,<br />
83.7% in 2x14Gy, 86.3% in 3x11Gy and 82.1% in 4x9.5Gy. The mean<br />
dose, gEUD, mean dose converted to 2Gy per fraction, gEUD<br />
converted to 2Gy per fraction, response probability and BEUD for the<br />
different <strong>org</strong>ans and fractionation schemes are shown in the Table.<br />
Keeping the fractionation scheme 4x9.5Gy as standard, the iso<br />
effective schemes regarding tumor control for 1, 2 and 3 fractions are<br />
1x19.91Gy, 2x13.81Gy and 3x11.11Gy. Finally, the optimum<br />
fractionation schemes for 1, 2, 3 and 4 fractions are 1x19.4Gy with a<br />
P+ <strong>of</strong> 91.5%, 2x13.7Gy with a P+ <strong>of</strong> 88.1%, 3x<strong>10</strong>.7Gy with a P+ <strong>of</strong> 88.7%<br />
and 4x9.1Gy with a P+ <strong>of</strong> 87.6%.<br />
: The present analysis shows that among the fractionation<br />
schemes <strong>of</strong> 1x20Gy, 2x14Gy, 3x11Gy and 4x9.5Gy the first scheme is<br />
more effective. However, after performing a radiobiological<br />
optimization to the different fractionation schemes individually, it is<br />
shown that the 1x19.4Gy scheme is overall more effective, whereas<br />
the 4x9.1Gy scheme is the least effective one. Based on our results, it<br />
appears that an improvement in the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the optimized<br />
HDR dose distributions can be achieved if a radiobiological evaluation<br />
and optimization could be applied.
S60 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
OC144<br />
DOSIMETRIC AND RADIOBIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF MANUALLY AND<br />
INVERSELY OPTIMIZED BRACHYTHERAPY TREATMENT PLANNING<br />
T. Palmqvist 1 , A.D. Wanderås 2 , A.B.L. Marthinsen 2 , M. Sundset 3 , I.<br />
Langdal 2 , S. Danielsen 2 , I. TomaDasu 1<br />
1<br />
Stockholm University and Karolinska Institutet, Medical Radiation<br />
Physics, Stockholm, Sweden<br />
2<br />
St. Olav’s Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Trondheim, Norway<br />
3<br />
St. Olav’s Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Gynaecological Oncology,<br />
Trondheim, Norway<br />
: To compare five inverse treatment planning<br />
techniques with the conventional manually optimized planning<br />
approach for brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> cervical cancer with respect to<br />
dosimetric and radiobiological parameters.<br />
: Eighteen cervical cancer patients treated<br />
with external radiotherapy (2Gy x 25) and MRI guided HDR<br />
brachytherapy (5Gy x 4) were included in this study. For each patient<br />
six plans were created: one manually optimized and five inversely<br />
planned for each <strong>of</strong> the four HDR brachytherapy fractions. Three<br />
inverse planning simulated annealing (IPSA13) approaches, using<br />
different dose objectives not only for the target but also for the<br />
<strong>org</strong>ans at risk were investigated and compared to plans created with<br />
equal dwell times and prescription to target points. The dose was<br />
prescribed to the surface <strong>of</strong> the target volume. The resulting dose<br />
volume histograms were analyzed and compared from the dosimetric<br />
and the radiobiological point <strong>of</strong> view by quantifying specific<br />
dosimetric parameters D90, D<strong>10</strong>0, COIN, and D2ccm for rectum, bladder<br />
and the sigmoid colon, and the probability <strong>of</strong> complication free cure,<br />
P+, respectively.<br />
: A summary <strong>of</strong> the results showing the average dose and<br />
volume parameters for all the six plans performed for each patient is<br />
given in the table below. IPSA led to superior target coverage and<br />
similar COIN values compared to the manual optimization. The manual<br />
optimization led to the better results with respect to the dose to the<br />
most exposed 2 cm 3 volume, D2ccm for the <strong>org</strong>ans at risk. Nevertheless,<br />
the radiobiological evaluation <strong>of</strong> the plan rendered comparable<br />
probabilities <strong>of</strong> complication free cure within the uncertainties<br />
originating from the radiobiological parameters. Overall, the best<br />
results were obtained with manual optimization and IPSA3 with<br />
volumetric constraints.<br />
Dose and volume parameters for the manually optimized plan and the<br />
inverse planning techniques (average for all patients)<br />
Manual<br />
optimization<br />
Inverse planning technique<br />
IPSA1 IPSA2 IPSA3<br />
Equal Target<br />
Dwell Time Points<br />
CTV:<br />
78.3±8.5 87.5±7.9 91.7±6.0 82.5±9.6 64.8±9.6 74.2±6.7<br />
V<strong>10</strong>0 (%)<br />
CTV: D90<br />
4.07±0.65 4.81±0.74 5.23±0.70 4.38±0.83 3.22±0.52 3.74±0.51<br />
(Gy)<br />
CTV:<br />
D<strong>10</strong>0<br />
(Gy)<br />
Bladder<br />
D2ccm<br />
(Gy)<br />
Rectum<br />
D2ccm<br />
(Gy)<br />
Sigmoid<br />
D2ccm<br />
(Gy)<br />
2.13±0.52 2.64±0.63 2.88±0.66 2.36±0.66 1.69±0.41 1.97±0.46<br />
4.77±0.64 5.06±0.50 5.47± 0.64 4.82±0.60 4.88±1.20 4.96±0.92<br />
3.14±0.72 3.37±0.55 3.69±0.67 3.23±0.54 2.47±0.70 2.50±0.59<br />
3.69±0.64 4.02±0.67 4.41±0.73 3.81±0.73 3.19±0.80 3.74±0.84<br />
COIN 0.59±0.08 0.57±0.07 0.55±0.07 0.58±0.07 0.50±0.07 0.57±0.07<br />
CTV:<br />
24.4±5.6 29.4±6.6 34.6±7.2 26.4±6.5 22.5±4.8 27.1±3.5<br />
V200 (%)<br />
: Inverse planning simulated annealing with proper dose<br />
objectives is a good choice when it is necessary to minimize staff<br />
workload and treatment planning time. However, the dose to <strong>org</strong>ans<br />
at risk must be inspected thoroughly and manually adjusted if<br />
exceeding the recommended <strong>org</strong>an dose limits. Nevertheless,<br />
dosimetric and radiobiological criteria are similarly fulfilled with<br />
manual or inverse optimization approaches indicating the potential <strong>of</strong><br />
inverse planning simulated annealing for brachytherapy.<br />
<br />
<br />
146<br />
ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
J.N. Aronowitz 1<br />
1 University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts, Radiation Oncology, Worcester MA, USA<br />
Beginning in 1908, clinicians (urologists, radiologists, and radiation<br />
oncologists) have treated prostate cancer with natural (radium,<br />
radon), react<strong>org</strong>enerated (radiogold, iridium), and kcapture ( <strong>12</strong>5 I,<br />
<strong>10</strong>3 Pd, 131 Cs) radionuclides. There have been intracavitary (urethral,<br />
rectal) and interstitial (suprapubic, retropubic, transperineal)<br />
implants. Source placement has been directed by touch, fluoroscopy,<br />
sonography, and MR.<br />
This review examines the techniques and personalities that have<br />
shaped prostate brachytherapy over an eventful century.<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 61<br />
<br />
PO147<br />
SECTOR ANALYSIS OF I<strong>12</strong>5 PROSTATE IMPLANTS PROVIDES AN<br />
EFFECTIVE METHOD IN COMPARING PRE AND POSTIMPLANT<br />
DOSIMETRY<br />
A.B. Mohamed Yoosuf 1 , M.M. O'Toole 1 , M. Straney 1 , R. Verghis 2 , E.<br />
Napier 3 , D.M. Mitchell 4 , G. Workman 1<br />
1<br />
Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Radiotherapy Medical Physics<br />
Section, Belfast, United Kingdom<br />
2<br />
Royal Group <strong>of</strong> Hospital Trust, Clinical Research Support Centre,<br />
Belfast, United Kingdom<br />
3<br />
Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology, Belfast,<br />
United Kingdom<br />
4<br />
Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Department <strong>of</strong> Clinical Oncology,<br />
Belfast, United Kingdom<br />
: To evaluate <strong>12</strong> sector analysis in the assessment<br />
and comparison <strong>of</strong> pre and post implant dosimetric parameters<br />
during the development <strong>of</strong> an I<strong>12</strong>5 permanent prostate<br />
brachytherapy (PPB) service.<br />
: 50 consecutive men treated with PPB had<br />
dose volume analysis in <strong>12</strong> sectors <strong>of</strong> their preimplant ultrasound<br />
(PIUS) and postimplant CT (PICT) volumes using a Variseed TM 8.0<br />
treatment planning system. PIUS dosimetry was performed 2 weeks<br />
prior to implantation and PICT dosimetry 4 weeks post implant.<br />
Individual sectors were created by dividing the craniocaudal prostate<br />
length into 3 equal lengths creating prostate base (PB), midgland (PM)<br />
and apex (PA). Each <strong>of</strong> these volumes was then divided into four axial<br />
sectors (right and left anterior, right and left posterior). The prostate<br />
volume (PVOL), dose to 90% (D90) and 50% (D50) <strong>of</strong> prostate, volume<br />
enclosed by <strong>10</strong>0% (V<strong>10</strong>0), 150% (V150) and 200% (V200) dose were<br />
recorded in each sector for PIUS and PICT. Differences in individual<br />
sectors on PIUS and PICT were evaluated. Implant quality was evaluated<br />
by measuring conformity index (CI=V<strong>10</strong>0/PVOL) in base, midgland and<br />
apex regions. Adjacent sectors uniformity on PIUS was assessed as<br />
were adjacent sectors on PICT.<br />
: Statistically significant differences between PIUS and PICT<br />
were noted in prostate volume, particularly in PB with PICT >PIUS as<br />
shown in figure (1a). When individual sectors on PIUS and PICT were<br />
compared, statistically significant differences were noted in the<br />
majority <strong>of</strong> dosimetric parameters. The dose in the anterior PB and<br />
PM were significantly lower on PICT (p value < 0.001) and significantly<br />
higher at the posterior PM and PA (p value < 0.05). These changes<br />
were consistent across all analysed parameters. In particular,<br />
significant absolute differences in D90 in equivalent sectors on PIUS<br />
and PICT were seen as shown in figure (1b). Sector analysis in PICT<br />
showed a lower degree <strong>of</strong> conformity in the base sectors (0.71 ± 0.2)<br />
when compared to midgland (0.97 ± 0.1) and apex (0.96 ± 0.1)<br />
regions. Adjacent sector analysis demonstrated uniformity in all<br />
sector sets <strong>of</strong> PIUS and the majority <strong>of</strong> sector sets <strong>of</strong> PICT.<br />
:<strong>12</strong> sector analysis allows rapid assessment <strong>of</strong>, PIUS and<br />
PICT, dose and volume homogeneity. It <strong>of</strong>fers a scientific method <strong>of</strong><br />
identifying areas <strong>of</strong> relative over and under dosing on PICT when<br />
compared with PIUS providing both clinicians and physicists with a<br />
learning tool to refine dosimetric analysis and highlight sectors where<br />
implant quality could be improved.<br />
PO148<br />
OUTCOME AND TOXICITY AFTER SALVAGE PROSTATECTOMY,<br />
CRYOSURGERY AND BRACHYTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER<br />
RECURRENCES<br />
M. Peters 1 , M.R. Moman 1 , H.G. van der Poel 2 , H. Vergunst 3 , I.J. de<br />
Jong 4 , P.L.M. Vijverberg 5 , J.J. Battermann 1 , S. Horenblas 2 , M. Vulpen 1<br />
1<br />
University Medical Center, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />
2<br />
Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department <strong>of</strong> Urology, Amsterdam,<br />
The Netherlands<br />
3<br />
CanisiusWilhelmina Hospital Nijmegen The Netherlands,<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Urology, Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />
4<br />
University Medical Center Groningen The Netherlands, Department<br />
<strong>of</strong> Urology, Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />
5<br />
St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein The Netherlands, Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Urology, Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />
: Current salvage treatments for recurrent cancer<br />
<strong>of</strong> the prostate after primary radiation therapy include radical<br />
prostatectomy, cryosurgery and brachytherapy. Because toxicity and<br />
failure rates are considerable, salvage treatments are not commonly<br />
performed. As most centers perform only one preferred salvage<br />
technique, literature only describes single center outcomes from a<br />
single salvage technique with a limited number <strong>of</strong> patients. In this<br />
overview, five high volume Dutch centers describe their toxicity and<br />
outcome data using different salvage techniques. This provides a view<br />
on how salvage is performed in clinical practice in the Netherlands.<br />
: <strong>12</strong>9 patients from 5 different centers in the<br />
Netherlands were retrospectively analyzed. Biochemical failure was<br />
defined as PSA > 0,1 ng/ml for the salvage >prostatectomy group (n =<br />
44) and PSA nadir + 2,0 ng/ml (Phoenix definition) for the salvage<br />
cryosurgery (n = 54) and salvage brachytherapy group (n = 31).<br />
Toxicity was scored according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for<br />
Adverse Events (CTCAE v3.0).<br />
: Biochemical failure occurred in 25 (81%) patients in the<br />
brachytherapy group (mean followup 29±24 months), 29 (66%)<br />
patients in the prostatectomygroup (mean followup 22± 25 months)<br />
and 33 (61%) patients in the cryosurgery group (mean followup 14± 11<br />
months). Severe (grade >3) genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity<br />
was observed in up to 30% <strong>of</strong> patients in all three groups (table 1).<br />
: This overview shows clinical practice <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer<br />
salvage. Significant failure and toxicity rates are observed, regardless
S62 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> salvage technique. Patients should be selected with great care<br />
before <strong>of</strong>fering one <strong>of</strong> these salvage treatment strategies.<br />
PO149<br />
DEVELOPMENT OF A PRACTICAL PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY TRAINING<br />
PHANTOM<br />
K. Forsythe 1 , A. Svoboda 1 , R.G. Stock 1<br />
1<br />
Mount Sinai Medical Center, Dept. Radiation Oncology, New York,<br />
USA<br />
: Training in prostate brachytherapy remains non<br />
standardized and a suitable training phantom for practicing fully<br />
simulated implants does not exist. The only commercially available<br />
training phantom is prohibitively expensive (~$400) and its brittle gel<br />
matrix cannot withstand the trauma <strong>of</strong> needlesticks without suffering<br />
permanent needle track scars which render it incompatible with TRUS<br />
imaging. Our objective was to develop a reusable training phantom<br />
that was 1) composed <strong>of</strong> hydrocolloids with rheological properties<br />
resilient to repeated needle sticks, 2) compatible with both TRUS and<br />
CT imaging, 3) composed <strong>of</strong> inexpensive materials, and 4) can be<br />
made relatively easily by hand.<br />
: The phantom’s basic model consists <strong>of</strong> a gel<br />
based prostate with a Foley catheter as standin for the urethra and a<br />
gelbased rectum, both <strong>of</strong> which are encompassed by a gelbased<br />
perineum. Two sets <strong>of</strong> molds are made for casting the prostate and<br />
rectum, and once casted they are embedded within the surrounding<br />
gelbased perineum. After construction, the phantom is fixed to the<br />
procedure table and the user may perform a fully simulated TRUS<br />
guided implant. After completion <strong>of</strong> the implant, the phantom may<br />
undergo CT imaging so that postimplant dosimetry can be performed<br />
and the quality <strong>of</strong> the implant may be evaluated by standard dose<br />
metrics (D90, V<strong>10</strong>0, RV<strong>10</strong>0, UrethraV150, etc.)<br />
For the construction <strong>of</strong> the prostate mold, rectal wall mold, and<br />
phantom container: NSP S<strong>of</strong>t clay ($4.25/lb), Van Aken clay<br />
($5.22/2lbs), Mold Star 15 Silicone ($30.99/pint), foam core poster<br />
board ($0.64/sq ft), 1’ <strong>of</strong> ¾' PVC pipe ($0.99), 1’ <strong>of</strong> 1½'' PVC pipe<br />
($0.99), ¾' PVC pipe coupling adaptor ($0.49), 1½' PVC pipe coupling<br />
adaptor ($0.89), Propoxy Epoxy ($7.55/4.8oz), 6' plastic funnel<br />
($1.82), 1 gallon Rubbermaid container ($9.42). Reagents for gel<br />
based components: Foley catheter ($2.00), Barium Sulfate<br />
($1.50/30g), agar powder ($2.34/55g), glycerine ($0.27/20g).<br />
: The phantom’s container and casting molds are all durable<br />
products which may be reused indefinitely and have a subtotal cost<br />
<strong>of</strong> $62.85. The gelbased components <strong>of</strong> the phantom have a subtotal<br />
cost <strong>of</strong> $6.11 and may be discarded after each use or remelted and<br />
recast into refurbished gelbased components. The gelbased<br />
components <strong>of</strong> the phantom are compatible with performing a fully<br />
simulated TRUSguided implant without the troublesome permanent<br />
needle track scars <strong>of</strong> commercially available phantoms; the gelbased<br />
components are also easily distinguishable on CT imaging which<br />
permits postimplant dosimetry. Repeated practice with the phantom<br />
can yield increased pr<strong>of</strong>iciency as measured by standard dose metrics<br />
which can be plotted to document a user's learning curve for the<br />
procedure.<br />
: This reusable phantom has a significantly lower cost<br />
than commercially available phantoms. It is also the only training<br />
phantom that is both TRUS and CT compatible, which permits users to<br />
practice fully simulated implants and to objectively evaluate their<br />
performance. As a training aid, this phantom can help improve the<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> prostate brachytherapy implants on a wide scale.<br />
PO150<br />
THE IMPACT OF GEOMETRIC INACCURACIES ON RESULTING DOSE<br />
DISTRIBUTION DURING HDR PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
P. Paluska 1 , M. Hodek 1 , L. Kasaova 1 , I. Sirak 1 , M. Zouhar 1 , M. Vosmik 1 ,<br />
J. Petera 1<br />
1<br />
University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Department <strong>of</strong> Oncology and<br />
Radiotherapy, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic<br />
: Highdose rate interstitial brachytherapy (BT) can<br />
be applied as a boost treatment in combination with external beam<br />
radiation therapy (EBRT) <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer. Transrectal ultrasound<br />
(TRUS) guided transperineal temporary brachytherapy using an<br />
iridium192 stepping source and a remote afterloading technique<br />
represents the standard <strong>of</strong> interstitial prostate BT. Simplified model<br />
<strong>of</strong> parallel linear guide needles in the planning s<strong>of</strong>tware doesn’t<br />
represent the real implant precisely. The purpose <strong>of</strong> our study was to<br />
evaluate the impact <strong>of</strong> needles’ representation inaccuracies and<br />
changes in anatomy during implantation on resulting dose distribution.<br />
: The implantation starts with acquisition <strong>of</strong><br />
axial TRUS images in steps <strong>of</strong> 5 mm distance from base to apex <strong>of</strong><br />
prostate. TRUS images are transferred to planning s<strong>of</strong>tware, where<br />
CTV, urethra and rectum are delineated. Initial needle geometry,<br />
prepared during preplanning one day before implantation, is<br />
reproduced. After insertion <strong>of</strong> each guide needle, the needle<br />
coordinates are corrected based on it’s position on central transversal<br />
TRUS image, but the needles are still represented as linear and<br />
parallel. Volume optimization <strong>of</strong> the target dose distribution is<br />
performed to achieve the best possible CTV coverage by 8 Gy isodose,<br />
urethral doses < <strong>10</strong> Gy and rectal doses < 6.4 Gy.<br />
For the purpose <strong>of</strong> this study, TRUS images were acquired after the<br />
implantation <strong>of</strong> all the needles. Postimplant TRUS images were fused<br />
with preimplant ones based on template invariable geometry. CTV,<br />
urethra and rectum were delineated and contours’ positions were<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 63<br />
compared with positions on preimplant images. The implant model<br />
was corrected according to the real situation <strong>of</strong> nonparallel needles,<br />
as visible on postimplant images. The irradiation plan was<br />
recalculated with the original dwell times. CTV dose coverage and<br />
maximal urethral and rectal doses were compared with the original<br />
ones.<br />
: Eleven applications on six patients were analyzed. Maximal<br />
urethra contour changes varied between 2 and 7 mm, median 4 mm.<br />
Maximal observed change in the needle position was 5 mm.<br />
Differences in CTV dose coverage varied between 3.7 % and 0.3 %,<br />
with a mean result <strong>of</strong> 1.1 %. Differences in maximal rectal dose<br />
varied between 0.1 Gy and 1.7 Gy, in 9 cases from 11 total the<br />
maximal rectal dose was higher than the original one. Differences in<br />
maximal urethral dose varied between 1.4 Gy and 1.9 Gy, in 7 cases<br />
from 11 total the maximal urethral dose was higher than the original<br />
one.<br />
: Inaccurate implant model assuming parallel linear guide<br />
needles and rigid anatomy can lead to a significant underestimation <strong>of</strong><br />
urethral and rectal doses. Especially needles close to urethra and<br />
rectum should be modeled with a special care.<br />
PO151<br />
LONG TERM RESULTS OF HDR BRACHYTHERAPY IN MEN OLDER THAN 75<br />
WITH LOCALIZED CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE<br />
R. Soumarova 1 , L. Homola 1 , H. Perkova 1<br />
1 Radioterapie a.s., radiation oncology, Novy Jicin, Czech Republic<br />
: Prostate cancer is an illness with a high<br />
incidence, especially among older men. The choice <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />
option among men above 75 years is however not clear. Radical<br />
prostatectomy in this age group is connected with a relatively high<br />
morbidity. A further possibility <strong>of</strong> curative treatment is radiotherapy,<br />
which can be administered in the form <strong>of</strong> external beam or in<br />
combination with high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. The aim <strong>of</strong> our<br />
work was to ascertain how HDR brachytherapy is tolerated among men<br />
older than 75 and how associated diseases can influence the tolerance<br />
to this treatment. Of interest to us were the treatment results and<br />
mortality from other diseases.<br />
: We analysed a sample <strong>of</strong> 20 men above 75<br />
years old (median 77 years), who were undergoing treatment by a<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> external radiotherapy and brachytherapy. 16 (80 %) <strong>of</strong><br />
them had prostate cancer with a intermediate and high risk <strong>of</strong><br />
recurrence, 4 had low risk prostate cancer. Most patients – 14 (70 %)<br />
had less than two comorbidities.<br />
: The median observation period was 57 months. No<br />
perioperative complications were recorded. Acute genitourinary<br />
toxicity (GU) to a maximum grade <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong> manifested in 60% <strong>of</strong> cases.<br />
Acute gastrointestinal toxicity (GIT) was observed only at grade 1, and<br />
in 25% <strong>of</strong> cases. Late GU toxicity occurred in 35% <strong>of</strong> patients, with<br />
only one such <strong>of</strong> grade 3; late GIT toxicity was recorded at grade 1<br />
only in 3 patients (15%). 70% <strong>of</strong> the men lived posttreatment longer<br />
than 3 years, 50% at present live more than 5 years. Longterm<br />
biochemical remission was achieved in 18 patients (90%).<br />
: HDR BRT is possible and welltolerated in older men<br />
above 75 years in good condition and without serious intercurrence.<br />
Wellselected older patients with higherrisk tumours and without<br />
serious comorbidities undoubtedly benefit from radical treatment<br />
when compared with watchful waiting.<br />
PO152<br />
EXPLORING THE DOSIMETRIC AND RADIOBIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF<br />
PROSTATE SEED LOSS AND MIGRATION<br />
C. Knaup 1 , C. Esquivel 1 , P. Mavroidis 2 , S. Stathakis 1 , N. Papanikolaou 1<br />
1 University <strong>of</strong> Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Cancer<br />
Therapy & Research Center, San Antonio, USA<br />
2 Karolinska Institutet, Medical Physics, Stockholm, Sweden<br />
: Low doserate brachytherapy is commonly used<br />
to treat prostate cancer. However, once implanted, the seeds are<br />
vulnerable to loss and movement. Ideally, the postimplant evaluation<br />
would quantify these effects. However, many clinicians opt for day 0<br />
postimplant scanning based on logistical issues and patient<br />
convenience. Therefore a general estimation <strong>of</strong> these effects may be<br />
useful for making patient care decisions when seeds are lost after the<br />
postimplant scan. The goal <strong>of</strong> this work was to explore the dosimetric<br />
and radiobiological effects <strong>of</strong> the types <strong>of</strong> seed loss and migration<br />
commonly seen in prostate brachytherapy. The results may be a<br />
useful guide for clinicians confronted with the problem <strong>of</strong> seed loss<br />
following implantation.<br />
: Five patients were used in this study. For<br />
each patient three treatment plans were created using Iodine<strong>12</strong>5,<br />
Palladium<strong>10</strong>3 and Cesium131 seeds. The three seeds that were<br />
closest to the urethra were identified and modeled as the seeds lost<br />
through the urethra. The three seeds closest to the exterior <strong>of</strong><br />
prostatic capsule were identified and modeled as those lost from the<br />
prostate periphery. The seed locations and <strong>org</strong>an contours were<br />
exported from Prowess and used by inhouse s<strong>of</strong>tware to perform the<br />
dosimetric and radiobiological evaluation. The radiobiological<br />
evaulation was based on the linearquadratic model. Seed loss was<br />
simulated by removing 1, 2 or 3 seeds near the urethra 0, 2 or 4 days<br />
after the implant or removing seeds near the exterior <strong>of</strong> the prostate<br />
14, 21 or 28 days after the implant.<br />
: Loss <strong>of</strong> one, two or three seeds through the urethra results in<br />
a D90 reduction <strong>of</strong> 2%, 5% and 7% loss respectively. Due to delayed loss<br />
<strong>of</strong> peripheral seeds, the dosimetric effects are less severe than for<br />
loss through the urethra. However, while the dose reduction is modest<br />
for multiple lost seeds, the reduction in tumor control probability was<br />
minimal.<br />
Table 1. Results <strong>of</strong> the dosimetric and radiobiological effect <strong>of</strong> central<br />
seed loss through the urethra for implants with I<strong>12</strong>5 seeds.<br />
<strong>12</strong>5<br />
I Missing Dmin (Gy) D50 (Gy) D80 (Gy) D90 (Gy) V<strong>10</strong>0 (%) V150 (%) TCP (%)<br />
Day 0 1 1.4 ± 1.4 4.0 ± 0.7 3.7 ± 1.0 2.8 ± 0.7 1.8 ± 1.7 2.0 ± 0.4 0.0 ± 0.0<br />
2 4.4 ± 3.2 7.7 ± 1.3 7.0 ± 1.5 5.9 ± 1.0 4.2 ± 3.4 3.3 ± 0.6 0.1 ± 0.1<br />
3 8.7 ± 4.3 <strong>10</strong>.4 ± 2.1 9.7 ± 1.3 9.1 ± 2.7 5.9 ± 4.0 4.1 ± 0.7 0.4 ± 0.3<br />
Day 2 1 1.4 ± 1.4 3.9 ± 0.7 3.5 ± 1.0 2.7 ±0.7 1.7 ±1.6 1.9 ± 0.5 0.0 ± 0.0<br />
2 4.2 ± 2.9 7.5 ± 1.3 6.7 ± 1.5 5.6 ±1.0 4.0 ± 3.4 3.2 ± 0.6 0.1 ± 0.1<br />
3 8.0 ± 4.0 <strong>10</strong>.2 ± 2.0 9.3 ± 1.4 8.7 ± 2.6 5.7 ± 3.9 4.0 ± 0.7 0.3 ± 0.4<br />
Day 4 1 1.4 ± 1.3 3.8 ± 0.7 3.4 ± 0.9 2.6 ± 0.7 1.6 ± 1.5 1.9 ± 0.5 0.0 ± 0.0<br />
2 4.0 ± 2.7 7.4 ± 1.2 6.5 ± 1.4 5.4 ± 1.0 3.9 ± 3.2 3.1 ± 0.6 0.1 ± 0.1<br />
3 7.3 ± 3.8 9.9 ± 2.0 9.0 ± 1.4 8.4 ± 2.5 5.5 ± 3.8 4.0 ± 0.7 0.3 ± 0.3<br />
: The goal <strong>of</strong> this work was to explore the dosimetric and<br />
radiobiological effects <strong>of</strong> the types <strong>of</strong> seed loss and migration<br />
commonly seen in prostate brachytherapy. The results presented show<br />
that loss <strong>of</strong> multiple seeds can cause a substantial reduction <strong>of</strong> D90<br />
coverage. However, for the patients in this study the dose reduction<br />
was not seen to reduce tumor control probability.<br />
PO153<br />
PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTRE DOSIMETRY STUDY OF I<strong>12</strong>5 PROSTATE<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY PERFORMED AFTER TURP<br />
C. Salembier 1 , A. Rijnders 1 , A. Henry 2 , P. Nieh<strong>of</strong>f 3 , F.A. Siebert 3 , P.<br />
Hoskin 4<br />
1<br />
Europe Hospitals Site StElisabeth, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />
Oncology, Brussels, Belgium<br />
2<br />
St James', Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom<br />
3<br />
UHSH, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radiooncologie, Kiel,<br />
Germany<br />
4<br />
Mount Vernon, Cancer Center, Northwood, United Kingdom<br />
: To evaluate in a multicentre setting the ability <strong>of</strong><br />
centres to perform preimplant permanent prostate brachytherapy<br />
planning using Iodine<strong>12</strong>5 fulfilling dosimetric goals and constraints<br />
based on GECESTRO guidelines in the setting <strong>of</strong> implantation after<br />
prior TURp.<br />
: A reference transrectal ultrasound image set<br />
<strong>of</strong> the prostate gland from a patient who had undergone TURp having<br />
a significant residual cavity was used. Contouring <strong>of</strong> the prostate,
S64 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
clinical target volume and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk was performed by the co<br />
ordinating centre before image export. This was based on the existing<br />
GECESTRO guidelines but with small adaptations given the postTURp<br />
setting. Goals and constraints regarding the dosimetry were defined.<br />
: 17 centres participated in this study. The mean number <strong>of</strong><br />
needles used was 18 ( min<strong>10</strong> max 25). Mean number <strong>of</strong> seeds was 52<br />
(min 27 max 63). 8 out <strong>of</strong> the 17 centres applied a classical seed<br />
spacing with regular 1 cm seed centretocentre in the majority <strong>of</strong><br />
their needles, whereas 9 centres used specially loaded needles that<br />
differed by having extra spacing between seeds. The mean seed<br />
strength used was 0,486 U (range 0,458 – 1,0 U) or 0,383 mCi (range<br />
0,361 – 0,787 mCi). The mean activity <strong>of</strong> the total implant was 27,8 U<br />
(range 25,7 – 33,9 U) or 21,9 mCi (range20,2 – 26,7 mCi). All centres<br />
fulfilled the requested dosimetry constraints for the prostate volume.<br />
The mean Vp<strong>10</strong>0 was 98 % (range 97,06 99,94%), the mean Dp90<br />
was 187 Gy (range 159 219 Gy), the mean Vp150 was 73% (range 42 <br />
90%) and the mean Vp200 was 35 % (range 18 56%). All but 2 centres<br />
fulfilled the CTV dosimetric constraints and these two centres<br />
deviated from the requirements by only a small amount which could<br />
have been corrected by movement <strong>of</strong> one or two seeds by a few<br />
millimetres. The mean V<strong>10</strong>0 for the CTV was 96,5 % (range 94 <br />
99,41%), mean V150 was 62 % (range 41 – 75,4%) and mean D90 was<br />
171 Gy (range 157 – 186 Gy). In terms <strong>of</strong> urethral dosimetry, all but 2<br />
institutions were able to fulfil the protocol requirements. These 2<br />
centres exceeded the Du30 constraint achieving 133 Gy and 134 Gy<br />
in contrast to the protocol constraint <strong>of</strong> ≤130Gy). The mean Du30 was<br />
118 Gy (min 99 – max 134 Gy) and the mean Du<strong>10</strong> was <strong>12</strong>4 Gy (min <strong>10</strong>4<br />
– max 148 Gy). All centres achieved the required rectal dose<br />
constraints. Sector analysis was performed for all plans. Given the<br />
small prostatic volume, eight segments were defined. The typical<br />
postTURp defect results in very small anterior segments. For each<br />
segment, D90 and V<strong>10</strong>0 were calculated. 3 centres showed perfect<br />
coverage for D90 and V<strong>10</strong>0 for all defined segments. Four centres had<br />
a clear underdosage in the basal anterior segments and fourteen<br />
centres had an underdosage in the apical anterior segments.<br />
: Consistent preimplantation planning with adherence to<br />
protocol guidelines is feasible in a postTURp setting. This study<br />
validates the proposed standardized contouring in this specific<br />
anatomical setting and the proposed dose goals and constraints. A<br />
prospective study evaluating the outcome <strong>of</strong> prostate I<strong>12</strong>5<br />
brachytherapy performed after transurethral resection <strong>of</strong> the prostate<br />
can therefore be undertaken with an expectation <strong>of</strong> consistent<br />
dosimetry in the multicentre setting.<br />
PO154<br />
FOCAL BRACHYTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER: A PILOT STUDY<br />
J.M. Cosset 1 , X. Cathelineau 2 , N. Pierrat 1 , D. Hajage 1 , G. Wakil 1 , F.<br />
Rozet 2 , E. Barret 2 , G. Vallancien 2<br />
1 Institut Curie, Radiotherapy, Paris, France<br />
2 Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Urology, Paris, France<br />
: Permanent implant prostate brachytherapy (using<br />
Iodine<strong>12</strong>5 seeds) is now recognized as one <strong>of</strong> the standard therapies<br />
for lowrisk localized prostate cancer. For strictly selected patients,<br />
focal therapy is nowadays increasingly proposed to limit toxicity and<br />
permit easier salvage in case <strong>of</strong> failure. <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, which is able<br />
to treat a welldefined partial prostate volume at a welldefined dose<br />
level, appears to be particularly well adapted to focal prostate<br />
therapy.<br />
: Focal brachytherapy was initiated by our<br />
group in February 20<strong>10</strong>, according to a protocol approved by our local<br />
ethics committee, with all patients signing an informed consent.<br />
Patient selection is based on (at least) two series <strong>of</strong> prostate biopsies<br />
and on a highresolution MRI. Only patients with very limited and<br />
localized tumors, according to strict criteria, were selected for the<br />
procedure. The technique is directly derived from the 'realtime'<br />
procedure with the implantation <strong>of</strong> 'free' Iodine<strong>12</strong>5 seeds, with<br />
dynamic dose calculation (continuous feedback as per the real<br />
positioning <strong>of</strong> each seed). We chose to deliver to the focal volume the<br />
dose usually recommended by GECESTRO for the whole prostate (145<br />
Gy).<br />
: To date, <strong>12</strong> focal implantations were performed. The treated<br />
volume corresponded to a mean value <strong>of</strong> 34 % <strong>of</strong> the total prostatic<br />
volume (range 2048 %). For the focal volume, mean D90 was 182 Gy (<br />
range 176188 Gy), and the mean V<strong>10</strong>0 was 99.6 % ( range 98.899.9<br />
%). In our experience, the technique could be performed without any<br />
problem in approximately an hour and a half, that is to say not<br />
significantly different from a usual 'whole prostate' brachytherapy. On<br />
our very preliminary results, early urinary toxicity seems to be inferior<br />
to what is usually observed after brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> the whole prostate,<br />
particularly for the focal 'apex only' cases. Incontinence score (ICS)<br />
was nil in all cases, as well as rectal toxicity. As for sexual toxicity,<br />
IIEF5 scores only showed very limited and transitory changes.<br />
: Focal treatment by brachytherapy is easily feasible with<br />
apparently little acute toxicity. Further investigation is needed to<br />
assess the results in terms <strong>of</strong> tumor control and toxicity.<br />
PO155<br />
DOSIMETRIC CONSTRAINT OPTIMIZATION IN INTRAOPERATIVE<br />
TREATMENT PLANNING OF PERMANENT SEED IMPLANTATION (PSI)<br />
K.U. Kasch 1 , P. Wust 2 , F. Kahmann 3 , T. Henkel 3<br />
1<br />
Beuth University for Applied Sciences Berlin,<br />
Mathematics/Physics/Chemistry, Berlin, Germany<br />
2<br />
Charité – University Medicine, CVK, Berlin, Germany<br />
3<br />
Outpatient Prostate <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Ullsteinhaus, Berlin, Germany<br />
: Today, PSI is an established treatment modality<br />
for (earlystage) prostate cancer. In comparison to alternatives the<br />
method <strong>of</strong>ten results in lower toxicity at equal tumor control. Current<br />
systems for the necessarily inverse treatment planning limit both type<br />
and number <strong>of</strong> available dosimetric constraints. Considering these<br />
limitations this study aims at a set <strong>of</strong> robust dosimetric constraints<br />
that translate into optimal clinical outcome.<br />
: The results presented here are based on the<br />
experience <strong>of</strong> about 2000 implantations performed by the authors <strong>of</strong><br />
this study. For a subgroup <strong>of</strong> about 400 patients both CTbased post<br />
implantation analyses were performed and standardized patient<br />
questionnaires were evaluated. Subsequently, first the<br />
correspondence <strong>of</strong> intraoperatively achieved dosimetric constraint<br />
values and those showing in the postimplant analysis was analyzed.<br />
Secondly, a possible correlation <strong>of</strong> dosimetric constraint values and<br />
clinical outcomes concerning acute and subacute toxicities was<br />
investigated. Finally, a set <strong>of</strong> robust dosimetric constraints was<br />
derived.<br />
This set was used by a supervised group <strong>of</strong> 20 medical physics master<br />
students to retrospectively (re)plan more than 300 patients (different<br />
from the above subgroup). The results were evaluated utilizing a<br />
quadratic score function for the dosimetric constraints as well as<br />
dosevolumehistograms (DVH) for prostate, urethra and rectum.<br />
Planning time and score function value as a function <strong>of</strong> the<br />
(increasing) number <strong>of</strong> patients planned by an individual student were<br />
interpreted in a learning curve.<br />
: The above derived set <strong>of</strong> dosimetric constraints results in a<br />
significant correlation between score function (physics) and DVH<br />
(clinical outcome). This, in conjunction with a steep learning curve in<br />
the planning process itself clearly indicates the clinical usefulness and<br />
robustness <strong>of</strong> the constraints found. The results can be used with<br />
commercially available treatment planning systems and do not depend<br />
on the seed activity.<br />
: Evaluation <strong>of</strong> postimplant analyses in conjunction with<br />
well designed patient questionnaires results in an optimized set <strong>of</strong><br />
dosimetric constraints. This, besides the growing experience with an<br />
increasing number <strong>of</strong> implantations, significantly contributes to the<br />
improvement <strong>of</strong> clinical outcome in PSI.<br />
PO156<br />
URINARY MORBIDITY RELATED TO PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY WITH<br />
OR WITHOUT EXTERNAL BEAM RADIATION THERAPY<br />
M. Ishida 1 , K. Kanao 1 , A. Sugawara 2 , R. Ohara 1 , S. Kashiyama 3 , M.<br />
Katayama 3 , N. Tsukamoto 3 , Y. Nakajima 1<br />
1 Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hosipital, Urology, Yokohama, Japan<br />
2 Keio University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Radiology, Tokyo, Japan<br />
3 Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hosipital, Radiology, Yokohama, Japan<br />
: A combination <strong>of</strong> permanent seed implantation<br />
brachytherapy (BT) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is one<br />
<strong>of</strong> the treatment options for localized prostate cancer with<br />
intermediate or high risk. As for the difference <strong>of</strong> radiation field and<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 65<br />
radiation dose between the cases treated with BT alone or BT<br />
combined with EBRT (BT + EBRT), the divergence <strong>of</strong> posttreatment<br />
urinary morbidity may be seen. This study is to clarify the difference<br />
<strong>of</strong> urinary morbidity in the cases treated with BT alone or BT + EBRT.<br />
: Seventyseven histologically confirmed<br />
prostate adenocarcinoma patients underwent iodine<strong>12</strong>5 seed BT in<br />
our institute between October 2009 and June 2011. Among those<br />
patients, <strong>10</strong> with incomplete data were excluded from this study. The<br />
median age was 72, ranged from 45 to 81. Of those 67 patients<br />
included in this study, 43 (64.2%) were treated with BT alone with<br />
prescription dose <strong>of</strong> 160 Gy and the other 24, who were evaluated as<br />
intermediate or high risk under D’Amico classification, were treated<br />
with 1<strong>10</strong> Gy <strong>of</strong> BT followed by 45 Gy (1.8 Gy x 25) <strong>of</strong> EBRT.<br />
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was obtained from those<br />
67 patients before BT (baseline) and 3 months (3M) after BT or BT +<br />
EBRT to evaluate voiding condition. To characterize urinary morbidity<br />
related to BT, changes <strong>of</strong> the scores from the baseline and the<br />
difference <strong>of</strong> the scores between two treatment groups were<br />
statistically analyzed with MannWhitney Utest.<br />
: Prostate volume was same in both treatment groups (BT<br />
alone: 26.7 ± 6.5 cc, BT+EBRT: 25.2 ± 11.8 cc, p = 0.16). There was<br />
no significant difference in total Biochemical Effective Dose (BED)<br />
between two groups, but BED <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy was higher in BT alone<br />
group (BT alone: 216.2 ± 25.1 Gy, BT+EBRT: 137.4 ± 17.7 Gy, p <<br />
0.01). There were no significant differences in total IPSS and<br />
obstructive urinary symptom score between the two treatment groups<br />
at baseline, however, irritative urinary symptom score was higher in<br />
BT+EBRT group (BT alone: 4.8 ± 2.8, BT+EBRT: 6.3 ± 3.2, p < 0.05).<br />
The changes <strong>of</strong> total IPSS from baseline revealed difference between<br />
the two treatment groups (BT alone: 8.7 ± 6.4, BT+EBRT: 0.6 ± 5.3, p<br />
< 0.01) showing that BT+EBRT had better voiding condition. The<br />
changes <strong>of</strong> obstructive urinary symptom score between the two<br />
treatment groups showed significant difference (BT alone: 5.6 ± 3.9,<br />
BT+EBRT 0.2 ± 3.3, p < 0.01). There was a significant difference<br />
between the two treatment groups on the changes <strong>of</strong> irritative urinary<br />
symptom score (BT alone: 3.0 ± 3.2, BT+EBRT 0.8 ± 2.8, p < 0.01).<br />
Urinary retention was not observed in both treatment groups.<br />
: According to the results <strong>of</strong> this study, urinary morbidity<br />
during the first 3 months after BT was lower in cases treated with BT<br />
combined with EBRT compared with cases treated with BT alone. It<br />
suggests that urinary morbidity is rather related to the radiation dose<br />
<strong>of</strong> implanted seeds than total BED.<br />
PO157<br />
RECTAL BALLOONS AND THE RISK OF SECONDARY RECTAL CANCER<br />
AFTER COMBINED MODALITY PROSTATE RADIATION<br />
R.J. Burri 1 , J. Ng 2 , D.P. Horowitz 2 , J.A. Cesaretti 3 , M. Terk 4 , J. Kao 5 ,<br />
T. Stephens 5 , K.S.C. Chao 2 , D.J. Brenner 6 , I. Shuryak 6<br />
1<br />
Tampa Bay Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, Sun City Center FL,<br />
USA<br />
2<br />
Columbia University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, New York<br />
NY, USA<br />
3<br />
Tampa Bay Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, Tampa FL, USA<br />
4<br />
Florida Radiation Oncology Group, Radiation Oncology, Jacksonville<br />
FL, USA<br />
5<br />
Tampa Bay Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, Brandon FL, USA<br />
6<br />
Columbia University Medical Center, Center for Radiological<br />
Research, New York NY, USA<br />
: An increased risk <strong>of</strong> secondary rectal malignancy<br />
is an established problem following definitive external beam radiation<br />
therapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer. Many highrisk, and some<br />
intermediaterisk, patients are currently treated with combined<br />
brachytherapy and EBRT, usually with an intensitymodulated<br />
radiation therapy (IMRT) plan to 45 Gy. In this study, a biologically<br />
based carcinogenesis model was used to quantitate and compare the<br />
predicted risk <strong>of</strong> secondary rectal cancer in men treated with or<br />
without a rectal balloon in place during the IMRT portion <strong>of</strong> combined<br />
modality therapy.<br />
: Treatment plans were developed for ten<br />
clinically localized prostate cancer patients using CT scans obtained<br />
both with and without a rectal balloon in place. Target volumes<br />
(prostate and proximal 1.5 cm <strong>of</strong> seminal vesicles) and normal<br />
structures were contoured, and dosevolume histograms (DVHs) for<br />
these <strong>org</strong>ans were determined with a planned IMRT dose <strong>of</strong> 45 Gy. A<br />
biologicallybased mathematical model <strong>of</strong> spontaneous and radiation<br />
induced carcinogenesis was used to determine the excess absolute risk<br />
<strong>of</strong> secondary rectal malignancies both with and without the rectal<br />
balloon in place. These risks were then compared to one another and<br />
to the baseline population.<br />
: Treatment with a rectal balloon in place resulted in a<br />
significantly lower mean rectal wall dose in all patients compared<br />
with treatment without a rectal balloon. The average mean rectal<br />
wall dose with a rectal balloon in place was 17.2 Gy versus 20.7 Gy<br />
without the rectal balloon (p=0.001). A significantly higher risk <strong>of</strong><br />
secondary rectal cancers was predicted for patients treated without<br />
rectal balloons when compared with patients treated with balloons in<br />
place (p=0.001, relative risk 1.22; 95% confidence interval 1.<strong>10</strong>1.34).<br />
: For prostate cancer patients treated with combined<br />
brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy, the use <strong>of</strong> a<br />
rectal balloon during the IMRT portion <strong>of</strong> treatment is associated with<br />
a significant reduction in the predicted risk <strong>of</strong> secondary rectal<br />
malignancy.<br />
PO158<br />
PHASE II TRIAL OF HIGHDOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY AND EXTERNAL<br />
RADIATION FOR INTERMEDIATERISK PROSTATE CANCER<br />
I. Tsukiyama 1 , R. Kobayashi 1 , J. Hiratsuka 2 , S. Kariya 3 , S. Uehara 4 , T.<br />
Dokiya 5 , H. Sekine 6 , T. Sato 7<br />
1<br />
Aidu Central Hospital, Radiology, Fukushima, Japan<br />
2<br />
Kawasaki Medical College, Radiation Oncology, Kurashiki, Japan<br />
3<br />
Kochi University, Diagnostic Radiology and Radiation Oncology,<br />
Kochi, Japan<br />
4<br />
Kyushu Cancer Center, Radiology, Fukuoka, Japan<br />
5<br />
Saitama Medical University, Radiation Oncology, Hidaka, Japan<br />
6<br />
Jikei University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Tokyo,<br />
Japan<br />
7<br />
Kitasato University, Urology, Kanagawa, Japan<br />
: To estimate the rate <strong>of</strong> early and late Grade 3 or<br />
greater genitourinary and gastrointestinal adverse <strong>events</strong> after<br />
treatment with external beam radiotherapy and prostate highdose<br />
rate (HDR) brachytherapy.<br />
: Patients with locally confined T2b,T2c or<br />
<strong>10</strong>ng/ml < PSA ≤ 20ng/ml or Gleason score=7 prostate cancer were<br />
eligible for the present study. All patients were treated 39 Gy in 13<br />
fractions using external beam radiotherapy and one HDR implant<br />
delivering 18 Gy in two fractions. All adverse event were graded<br />
according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event,<br />
version 3.0. Early adverse <strong>events</strong> were those occurring less than 9<br />
months and late adverse <strong>events</strong> were those occurring more than <strong>12</strong><br />
months from the start <strong>of</strong> the protocol treatment. Primary endpoint <strong>of</strong><br />
this study is rate <strong>of</strong> late Grade 3 or later adverse event. Secondary<br />
endpoints are rate <strong>of</strong> early Grade 3 adverse event and PSA failure<br />
rate.<br />
: A total <strong>of</strong> 92 patients from 5 institutions were enrolled in the<br />
present study. Of the 92 patients, 84 were eligible. Each rate <strong>of</strong> early<br />
adverse <strong>events</strong> <strong>of</strong> Grade 1 after three, six and nine months from the<br />
irradiation was 63%, 70% and 37% respectively, and that <strong>of</strong> Grade 2<br />
was 9%, 5%, and 3% respectively. Each rate <strong>of</strong> late adverse <strong>events</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Grade 1 after <strong>12</strong>, 18 and 24 months from the irradiation was 28%, 73%<br />
and 0% respectively, and that <strong>of</strong> Grade 2 was 4%, 0%, and 0%<br />
respectively. No adverse <strong>events</strong> <strong>of</strong> Grade 3 or greater were observed.<br />
Among 84 cases, only one patient caused PSA failure. The patient was<br />
treated with endocrine therapy.<br />
: As a result <strong>of</strong> highdose rate brachytherapy combined<br />
with external irradiation for intermediaterisk prostatic cancer, early<br />
and late adverse <strong>events</strong> <strong>of</strong> Grade 3 or greater did not occur, and only<br />
one patient had biochemical failure among the 84 patient. The<br />
technique and doses used in the present study resulted in acceptable<br />
level <strong>of</strong> adverse <strong>events</strong>.<br />
PO159<br />
LONG TERM TOXICITY FOLLOWING CS131 PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
R.P. Smith 1 , S. Beriwal 1 , R.M. Benoit 2<br />
1<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh, Radiation Oncology, Pittsburgh, USA<br />
2<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh, Urology, Pittsburgh, USA
S66 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
: Cesium131 is a newer radioisotope now being<br />
used in prostate brachytherapy (PB). We have noted a median<br />
duration <strong>of</strong> acute symptoms <strong>of</strong> 36 months following PB with Cs131.<br />
There is however, no data on long term urinary or bowel toxicity with<br />
this isotope, which this study addresses.<br />
: Patients undergoing PB with Cesium131 at<br />
our institution were asked to complete the Expanded Prostate Cancer<br />
Index Composite (EPIC) and IPSS survey preoperatively and at 2<br />
weeks, 1, 3, 6, 9 and <strong>12</strong> months and every 6 months thereafter<br />
following the implant. This report is based on the first <strong>10</strong>0 patients<br />
with at least 3 years <strong>of</strong> follow up, so that long term toxicity can be<br />
described. Scores in the EPICs range from 0 to <strong>10</strong>0, with higher scores<br />
corresponding to improved quality <strong>of</strong> life. A difference <strong>of</strong> > <strong>10</strong> points<br />
is noted to be a significant difference. The IPSS obviously indicates<br />
relative urinary morbidity while the EPIC notes morbidity in the<br />
following subscales: Urinary summary, urinary function, urinary<br />
bother, urinary incontinence, urinary irritative/obstructive, bowel<br />
summary, bowel function, and bowel bother.<br />
: There was no difference when comparing prebrachytherapy<br />
function to function at the 3 year mark in any <strong>of</strong> the EPIC subscales or<br />
in the IPSS score, indicating that PB with Cs131 carries little to no<br />
risk <strong>of</strong> long term morbidity to patients as a whole. In every subscale<br />
studied, however, there were patients who did not return to baseline.<br />
The median number who did not return to baseline in the different<br />
subscales studied was 21 (hence 21%). This was balanced by a number<br />
<strong>of</strong> patients who actually had an improvement in their function, with a<br />
median number improved in the different subscales being 19 patients<br />
(19%). Predictors <strong>of</strong> longterm toxicity were studied, including<br />
prostate volume, # seeds, seed activity, D90, V<strong>10</strong>0, V150, V200, V150<br />
urethra, V<strong>10</strong>0 urethra, Bladder neck D max, R<strong>10</strong>0, type <strong>of</strong> therapy,<br />
+/ ADT, the use preoperative alpha blockers, preoperative EPIC<br />
scores, age, and the need for a postoperative catheter. The only<br />
consistent predictor <strong>of</strong> worsening function at the 3 year mark was a<br />
better prebrachytherapy EPIC score.<br />
: Most patients undergoing PB with Cs131 have no urinary<br />
or bowel toxicity at the three year postbrachytherapy mark. Those<br />
that do have a worsening in function are balanced by those who<br />
actually have an improvement in function after PB with Cs131. The<br />
only consistent predictor for selfreported 3 year toxicity is better<br />
prebrachytherapy urinary and bowel function.<br />
PO160<br />
DAILY NEEDLE APPLICATOR DISPLACEMENT DURING HIGHDOSERATE<br />
PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY USING DAILY CT EXAMINATIONS<br />
T. Takenaka 1 , K. Yoshida 2 , M. Ueda 1 , H. Yamazaki 3 , S. Miyake 1 , E.<br />
Tanaka 4 , M. Yoshida 4 , Y. Yoshimura 1 , T. Oka 5 , K. Honda 1<br />
1<br />
Osaka national hospital, Radiology, Osaka, Japan<br />
2<br />
Osaka national hospital, Radiation Oncology and Institute for Clinical<br />
Research, Osaka, Japan<br />
3<br />
Kyoto prefectural university <strong>of</strong> medicine, Radiology, Kyoto, Japan<br />
4<br />
Osaka national hospital, Radiation Oncology, Osaka, Japan<br />
5<br />
Osaka national hospital, Urology, Osaka, Japan<br />
: To improve treatment conformity for prostate<br />
cancer, we investigated daily applicator displacement during high<br />
doserate interstitial brachytherapy (HDRISBT).<br />
: Between <strong>May</strong> 2007 and March 2009, 35<br />
patients at the National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital<br />
were treated with HDRISBT as monotherapy using our ambulatory<br />
technique. All patients received a treatment dosage <strong>of</strong> 49 Gy in 7<br />
fractions over 4 days. For dose administration, we examined 440<br />
flexible applicators (1320 points) using our unique ambulatory implant<br />
technique. Using CT images with a 3mm slice thickness, we<br />
calculated the relative coordinates <strong>of</strong> the titanium markers and the<br />
tips <strong>of</strong> the applicators. We calculated the distance between the<br />
center <strong>of</strong> gravity <strong>of</strong> the markers and the tips <strong>of</strong> the catheters, and<br />
compared the distances measured on the day <strong>of</strong> implantation and the<br />
second (21 hours), third (45 hours), and fourth (69 hours) treatment<br />
days.<br />
: The mean displacement distance for all applicators was 4.4 ±<br />
3.4 mm, 4.8 ± 4.1 mm, and 6.2 ± 4.5 mm at 21, 45, and 69 hours after<br />
initial planning CT. We used a 15mm margin for needle displacement<br />
and only 5 points (0.4%) <strong>of</strong> 3 patients (9%) exceeded this range.<br />
Almost patients (86%) showed the largest displacement within the first<br />
21 hours. The relative doses that covered <strong>10</strong>0% <strong>of</strong> CTV (D<strong>10</strong>0(CTV))<br />
values compared with the initial treatment plan were reduced to<br />
0.96±0.07, 0.95±0.08 and 0.92±0.1 at 21, 45 and 69 hours. However,<br />
the relative D90(CTV) values kept acceptable levels (1.01±0.02,<br />
1.01±0.03 and 0.96±0.05).<br />
: Cranial margin <strong>of</strong> 15 mm seems to be effective to keep<br />
D90(CTV) level if we do not do corrective action for 4 days <strong>of</strong><br />
implantation. However, corrective action should be performed to<br />
keep D<strong>10</strong>0(CTV) level and to reduce cranial margin and bladder neck<br />
complication.<br />
PO161<br />
LDR PROSTATE DOSIMETRY AND DOCUMENTATION FOCUS STUDY<br />
E. Cirino 1 , I. Iftimia 1 , L. Xiong 1 , H. Mower 1 , A. Mahadevan 1 , T. Lo 1<br />
1 Lahey Clinic, Radiation Oncology, Burlington, USA<br />
: This work is a retrospective review <strong>of</strong> twenty five<br />
low dose rate prostate (I<strong>12</strong>5 seed) treatment plans. The objective is<br />
to evaluate our criteria for determination <strong>of</strong> plan quality relative to<br />
current standards and to review our compliance with the definition <strong>of</strong><br />
medical <strong>events</strong> for brachytherapy.<br />
: Several references were reviewed to<br />
establish planning objectives (prostate and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk) for both<br />
intraoperative and one month postimplant plans. Our Radiation<br />
Oncologists reviewed a summary <strong>of</strong> these guidelines and in<br />
consideration <strong>of</strong> their historic practice and outcomes established<br />
updated criteria for our clinic. The new DVH criteria were used for<br />
the retrospective review.<br />
In a recent publication, an ASTRO working group recommended that<br />
the definition <strong>of</strong> a medical event for prostate permanent<br />
brachytherapy should be based on the implanted source strength and<br />
not dose. The recommendation was reviewed by our Radiation<br />
Oncologists then compared with local regulatory guidelines. It was<br />
agreed that this definition could be adopted in our clinic. The twenty<br />
five cases were reviewed to determine written directive compliance<br />
based on this definition.<br />
: Twenty four <strong>of</strong> the twenty five cases reviewed met the<br />
revised DVH guidelines. One <strong>of</strong> the twenty five cases had a one month<br />
postimplant prostate D90 less than 80%. This particular case showed<br />
an enlarged prostate volume and prompted further evaluation. The<br />
evaluation resulted in a revised process that triggers the physician to<br />
review the case in detail and document the review if a postoperative<br />
prostate D90 is less than 80% <strong>of</strong> the written directive target dose. The<br />
planning printouts are now customized to include the established<br />
criteria.<br />
A medical event is now based on greater than 20% <strong>of</strong> the source<br />
strength prescribed in the written directive being implanted outside<br />
the planning target volume in the one month postimplant evaluation.<br />
All <strong>of</strong> the study cases reviewed were compliant with the ASTRO<br />
recommended definition for written directive. The one month<br />
postimplant planning document was edited to reflect evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />
the source strength and therefore written directive compliance.<br />
: Updated planning DVH objectives were established<br />
based on literature review, used for the retrospective study, and<br />
implemented in our practice. The study showed good agreement with<br />
the updated objective for both the intraoperative plans and the one<br />
month postimplant plans.<br />
The ASTRO working group definition <strong>of</strong> a medical event based on<br />
verification <strong>of</strong> implanted source strength rather than dose was used<br />
for the retrospective review and adopted for future cases. Based on<br />
this definition all plans were in compliance.<br />
Future work will include a more detailed evaluation <strong>of</strong> the one month<br />
postimplant cases where prostate D90 is less than 80% to determine<br />
any predictors that could prompt modification during the<br />
intraoperative planning.<br />
PO162<br />
IMPACT OF DOSE ON INTERMEDIATERISK PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS<br />
TREATED WITH BRACHYTHERAPY ALONE OR BOOST<br />
A. Yorozu 1 , K. Toya 1 , K. Yoshida 1 , N. Koike 1 , A. Takahashi 1 , S. Saito 2 ,<br />
T. Nishiyama 2 , Y. Yagi 2 , R. Namidome 2 , A. Ashikari 2<br />
1<br />
Tokyo Medical Centre NHO, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Tokyo, Japan<br />
2<br />
Tokyo Medical Centre NHO, Department <strong>of</strong> Urology, Tokyo, Japan<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 67<br />
: To assess the impact <strong>of</strong> radiation dose on<br />
biochemical failure in intermediaterisk prostate cancer patients<br />
treated with brachtherapy (BT) alone or combined with external beam<br />
irradiation (EBRT).<br />
: From a prospectively collected database <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>12</strong>90 men treated at Tokyo Medical Center from 2003 to 2009 with I<br />
<strong>12</strong>5 BT for prostate cancer, 688 men with intermediaterisk patients<br />
with either one or more intermediaterisk features (PSA level <strong>10</strong>20<br />
ng/mL, Gleason score 7, or Stage T2b/2c) were identified who had a<br />
minimum followup <strong>of</strong> 24 months. Patients with lowtier <strong>of</strong><br />
intermediate risk (PSA < <strong>10</strong> ng/mL and Gleason score 3+4 with positive<br />
core rates less than 1/3 ) were treated with BT alone and the rest<br />
uppertier patients were treated with BT followed by EBRT. Gleason<br />
score was 7 in 76% <strong>of</strong> patients. PSA ranged from 1.4 to 20 ng/mL<br />
(median, 7.6 ng/mL). Seventy per cent <strong>of</strong> patients received<br />
neoadjuvant hormone therapy (median, 7 months) while 30 % <strong>of</strong><br />
patients did not. Biologically effective dose (BED) values were<br />
calculated to compare doses <strong>of</strong> treatment regimens. BED ranged from<br />
<strong>10</strong>5 to 250 Gy2 (median, 206 Gy2). Patient and treatmentrelated<br />
factors were analyzed with respect to freedom from biochemical<br />
failure (FFbF). The effects <strong>of</strong> multiple variables were tested by log<br />
rank and linear regression.<br />
: The median followup was 60 months (range, 24–<strong>10</strong>0 months).<br />
The overall FFbF using the ASTRO definition for all patients was 93 %<br />
at 5 years and 91 % at 7 years. Of the eight factors tested (age, T<br />
stage, PSA levels, Gleason score, positive core rate, use <strong>of</strong> hormone,<br />
use <strong>of</strong> EBRT, and BED), only BED (BED 180 Gy2) was<br />
found to be significant (p=0.003). To analyze the effect <strong>of</strong> increasing<br />
BED on FFbF, patients were devided in to three BED dose groups. The<br />
dose groups were 1802<strong>10</strong> Gy2 (n=368), and >2<strong>10</strong><br />
Gy2 (n=254). The 7year FFbF rate for BED groups was 81%, 91% and<br />
94%, respectively (p=0.0<strong>10</strong>). Cox regression revealed that Tstage<br />
(p=0.049), Gleason score (p=0.018) and BED (p=0.007) were significant<br />
predictors <strong>of</strong> FFbF when age, PSA, Tstage, Gleason score, positive<br />
core rate, hormone and BED were considered continuous variables.<br />
: Radiation dose is an important predictor <strong>of</strong> 5year FFbF<br />
in intermediaterisk prostate cancer. With the use <strong>of</strong> high BED<br />
radiotherapy setting, neoadjuvant hormone therapy did not have a<br />
significant impact on 5year FFbF rates. Individualized treatment<br />
using I<strong>12</strong>5 brachytherapy alone or boost should be a good option for<br />
intermediaterisk prostate cancer patients.<br />
PO163<br />
PSA RESPONSE TO TRIMODALITY PREDICTS BIOCHEMICAL<br />
PROGRESSION FREE SURVIVAL IN LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER<br />
M. Aoki 1 , K. Miki 2 , Y. Yamamoto 2 , M. Kido 2 , S. Takaki 1 , M. Kobayashi 1 ,<br />
C. Kanehira 1 , S. Egawa 2<br />
1<br />
Jikei University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology,<br />
Minatoku, Japan<br />
2<br />
Jikei University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Urology, Minato<br />
ku, Japan<br />
: High dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined<br />
with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), neoadjuvant androgen<br />
suppression therapy (NAST) and adjuvant androgen suppression<br />
therapy (AAST) (Trimodality) have been used to treat localized high<br />
risk prostate cancer. To define prognostic factors <strong>of</strong> biochemical<br />
relapse free survival (bRFS), an analysis <strong>of</strong> patients treated with Tri<br />
modality were performed.<br />
: Between <strong>May</strong> 2005 and Oct. 2008, <strong>10</strong>9 high<br />
risk prostate cancer patients (D'Amico classification) were treated<br />
with NAST prior to HDR brachytherapy combined with<br />
hyp<strong>of</strong>ractionated EBRT. Among <strong>10</strong>8 patients, <strong>10</strong>7 patients (99%) had<br />
completed AAST for 24 months after whole radiotherapy. The median<br />
age was 69 years (range, 5982). The median initial PSA was 23.5<br />
ng/ml (range, 3.9365). The median Gleason score was 8 (GS<br />
6/7/8/9/<strong>10</strong> : 7/23/35/23/4). The median follow up was 52 months<br />
(range, 3674). The median NAST was 9 months (range,<strong>12</strong>9). The<br />
median AAST was 24 months (range, 324). 74 patients:HDR<br />
brachytherapy (PTV: 5Gy, 6Gy, 2fx/day) and hyp<strong>of</strong>ractionated EBRT<br />
(45Gy : 3Gy×15fx/3weeks). 35 patients:HDR brachytherapy (PTV: 9Gy,<br />
9Gy, 2fx/day) and hyp<strong>of</strong>ractionated EBRT (40Gy :<br />
2.5Gy×16fx/3weeks). Hyp<strong>of</strong>ractionated EBRT was performed 1weeks<br />
after HDR brachytherapy. 66 patients were given total androgen<br />
suppression and 16 patiennts were given LHRH only as NAST.<br />
: With a median follow up <strong>of</strong> 52 months, bRFS <strong>of</strong> all patients<br />
was 81%(70mons). bRFS <strong>of</strong> high dose arm and low dose arm were <strong>10</strong>0%<br />
(48 mon) and 79.5%(76mon) respectively(p=0.24). On multivariate<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> factors predicting bRFS, dose <strong>of</strong> HDR and PreHDR PSA level<br />
were significant respectively (p=0.0003, 0.005). However age, initial<br />
PSA, Gleason score, duration <strong>of</strong> NHT were not significant respectively<br />
(p=0.68, 0.065, 0.40, 0.62). Patients in the PreHDR PSA0.1 group (87.9% vs. 68.2%, p=0.014). On multivariate analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
factors predicting PreHDR PSA level, although the term <strong>of</strong> NAST was<br />
not significant (p=0.076), initial PSA tend to be significant (p=0.052).<br />
: For highrisk prostate cancer patients treated with Tri<br />
modality (NAST, HDR plus EBRT, AAST), Dose <strong>of</strong> HDR and PreHDR PSA<br />
were important prognostic factors (p=0.0003, 0.005 respectively).<br />
Patients in the PreHDR PSA0.1 group (p=0.014). A<br />
further study is needed to confirm the importance <strong>of</strong> PreHDR PSA in<br />
Trimodality treatment.<br />
PO164<br />
SEED MIGRATION IN PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY DEPENDS ON<br />
EXPERIENCE AND TECHNIQUE<br />
G. Delouya 1 , D. Taussky 1 , C. Moumdjian 1 , R. Larouche 1 , D. Béliveau<br />
Nadeau 1 , C. Boudreau 1 , Y. Hervieux 1 , D. Donath 1<br />
1 CHUM Hôpital NotreDame, Radiation Oncology, Montréal, Canada<br />
: To determine the rate <strong>of</strong> seed loss and pulmonary<br />
migration over time in permanent seed prostate brachytherapy (PB).<br />
: The first 495 patients treated at our<br />
department were analyzed. All patients were treated with loose<br />
I <strong>12</strong>5 seeds using an automated seed delivery system and realtime<br />
intraoperative planning. Pelvic fluoroscopic imaging was done 30 days<br />
following the implant. Patients were divided into five groups <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong>0<br />
patients each according to the order treated. The five groups were<br />
compared using Chisquare test and Oneway analysis <strong>of</strong> variance<br />
(ANOVA).<br />
: A total <strong>of</strong> 22.8% <strong>of</strong> patients lost at least one seed. The<br />
highest percentage <strong>of</strong> patients losing any number <strong>of</strong> seeds was in the<br />
first group <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong>0 patients. At least one seed was lost in 38% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
patients. This number decreased gradually and reached a rate as low<br />
as 9% in the last group <strong>of</strong> one hundred patients (patients 400 to 499).<br />
The mean total seed loss rate (number <strong>of</strong> seeds lost/number <strong>of</strong> seeds<br />
implanted) changed significantly over time (p
S68 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
: 15 patients with local recurrent prostate<br />
cancer after primary radiotherapy were treated with focal salvage I<br />
<strong>12</strong>5 brachytherapy. Location <strong>of</strong> recurrent tumor was defined on T2<br />
weighted MRI and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)MRI, in<br />
combination with systematic <strong>10</strong>core prostate biopsy. Goal was to<br />
deliver 145Gy to the gross tumor volume (GTV) while maintaining dose<br />
limitations for <strong>org</strong>ans at risk. Toxicity was scored by the Common<br />
Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE3.0). Quality <strong>of</strong> Life<br />
(QoL) was measured by SF36 Health Survey, European Organization <strong>of</strong><br />
Research and Treatment <strong>of</strong> Cancer (EORTC) C30+3 and PR25<br />
questionnaires. Feasibility was defined as treating >90% <strong>of</strong> patients<br />
within prescription limits and severe toxicity (>grade 3) in<br />
: In 13 patients >95% <strong>of</strong> the GTV was covered with the<br />
prescribed dose. Mean D90 was 198Gy (range 150330). In 14 patients<br />
rectum and bladder doses were within limits. The D2cc for bladder<br />
and rectum were respectively 42Gy (1969) and 63Gy (1896). For<br />
urethra, median D<strong>10</strong> was 133Gy (<strong>10</strong>0240). With a minimum followup<br />
<strong>of</strong> 6 months one patient suffered from grade 3 gastrointestinal (GI)<br />
and genitourinary (GU) toxicity. Grade 2 occurred in 4 (GU) and 0 (GI)<br />
patients. Erectile dysfunction at baseline and after 6 months was seen<br />
in 6 patients. Quality <strong>of</strong> life significantly decreased with regard to<br />
social and pain measures. In <strong>12</strong> patients PSA declined during follow<br />
up.<br />
:<br />
Focal therapy for prostate cancer recurrences seems feasible and<br />
toxicity and influence on quality <strong>of</strong> life are acceptable.<br />
PO166<br />
PERMANENT PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY IN JAPANESE PATIENTS WITH<br />
SMALL PROSTATE GLANDS<br />
K. Kobayashi 1 , K. Okihara 2 , K. Kamoi 2 , T. Iwata 2 , T. Tsubokura 1 , N.<br />
Aibe 1 , N. Kodani 1 , T. Miki 2 , H. Yamazaki 1<br />
1<br />
Kyoto Prefectural University <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology,<br />
Kyoto, Japan<br />
2<br />
Kyoto Prefectural University <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Urology,<br />
Kyoto, Japan<br />
: To investigate the dosimetric and treatment<br />
related morbidity for brachytherapy in Japanese patients with<br />
prostate glands < 20cm 3<br />
: From April 2005 to December 20<strong>10</strong>, a total <strong>of</strong><br />
300 patients were treated by brachytherapy without EBRT in our<br />
institute. About 50% <strong>of</strong> 300 (151) patients had small prostate < 20cm 3 .<br />
We compared the two groups, Small prostate < 20cm 3 dosimetric<br />
quality assesment we useds Day 30 CT with MRI. We compared the two<br />
groups, Small prostate 20 cm3<br />
(nS). The implant technique was Hybrid interactiverealtime with Mick<br />
Aplicator method. Prescription dose was 145Gy. For assessment <strong>of</strong><br />
prostate volulme, we performed transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), MRI<br />
(one day before procedure day, Day1 and Day30). Dosimetric quality<br />
assessment was Day 30CT with MRI. Dosimetric quality was reported in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> the following parameters: D90, V<strong>10</strong>0, V150, rectalV<strong>10</strong>0,<br />
urethralD90. For the evaluation <strong>of</strong> treatmentrelated morbidity, we<br />
used CTCAE ver.4.<br />
: DVH parameters (S vs. nS) were D90 (170.2 vs. 171.5 Gy),<br />
V<strong>10</strong>0 (97.6 vs. 97.4 %), V150 (54.5 vs. 53.7%), rectalV<strong>10</strong>0 (0.02 vs.<br />
0.08ml) and urethralD90 (166.3 vs. 161.7Gy). The median age were<br />
(68.5 vs. 70y.o.), follow up length were (42 vs. 39 months). All<br />
parameters showed no significant difference. There were no acute<br />
Grade 2 urinary retention in the S group, but there were 5 patients<br />
who experienced Grade 2 retention in nS group (p=0.02). Acute Grade<br />
2 micoic pain was one case in both groups. Grade 2 incontinence was<br />
one case in S group (No significant difference). Late Grade 3 urinary<br />
toxicity <strong>of</strong> retention which needed transurethral resection <strong>of</strong> the<br />
prostate (TURP) was one case in nS group, and grade 2 retention were<br />
2 case in nS group. Grade 2 hematuria was occurred one case in both<br />
groups. There were no grade 3 rectal complications. Only one case <strong>of</strong><br />
grade 2 rectal hemorrhage was occurred in both groups. PSA failure<br />
determined by nadir +2 (except PSA bounce) was occurred one case in<br />
S group.<br />
: Our results demonstrate that bracytherapy for Japanese<br />
small prostate volumes is also highly effective, excellent post<br />
dosimetry and acceptable treatmentrelated morbidity. Regarding<br />
acute urinary retention it is unlikely to cause adverse <strong>events</strong> in small<br />
prostates.<br />
PO167<br />
IMPACT OF EMBEDDED SEEDS ON DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS IN XRAY<br />
RADIOTHERAPY: A PHANTOM STUDY WITH MONTE CARLO CALCULATION<br />
K. Shiraishi 1 , A. Sakumi 1 , A. Haga 1 , T. Onoe 1 , K. Yamamoto 1 , K.<br />
Okuma 1 , K. Yoda 1 , K. Nakagawa 1<br />
1 University <strong>of</strong> Tokyo, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology, Tokyo, Japan<br />
: In the multidisciplinary therapy era for high risk<br />
prostate cancer, external beam radiation therapy is <strong>of</strong>ten combined<br />
with brachytherapy boost. We have investigated the impact <strong>of</strong><br />
implanted seeds on dose distributions in xray radiotherapy by way <strong>of</strong><br />
Monte Carlo calculation.<br />
: Iodine<strong>12</strong>5 seeds, OncoSeed (Oncura, USA),<br />
were implanted into a prostate training phantom for brachytherapy,<br />
Model 053 (CIRS, USA), and the phantom was positioned in water with<br />
an acrylic enclosure. A dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong>0 MU with a photon energy <strong>of</strong> 6 MV<br />
and a field size <strong>of</strong> 5 x 5 cm2 was unidirectionally delivered to the<br />
phantom and the projected image was acquired by a portal imager,<br />
iViewGT (Elekta, UK). A Monte Carlo based TPS, Monaco (Elekta, USA)<br />
was used to calculate the dose distributions inside the phantom with<br />
the identical radiation parameters. Another Monte Carlo code,<br />
EGSnrc, was also employed for comparison. Monaco was also used to<br />
calculate dose distributions when the same beam was delivered to the<br />
phantom from four directions <strong>of</strong> 0, 90, 180 and 270 degrees.<br />
:<br />
Figure 1(a) shows a projected image on the iViewGT panel, where<br />
seeds were clearly observed. Figure 1(b) shows dose perturbation<br />
caused by backscattering from each seed.<br />
Figure 1(c) shows another verification result done by the EGSnrc code<br />
under the same radiation parameters except for a field size <strong>of</strong> 3 x 3<br />
cm2 to reduce computation time. Again the dose fluctuation in space<br />
was clearly observed. Finally Figure 1(d) demonstrates that the above<br />
dose perturbation is not observed when multiple beams were<br />
delivered to the phantom including seeds. Good result was also<br />
obtained in dose verification<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 69<br />
:<br />
We have observed that seeds implanted in the phantom are<br />
acceptably visible in EPID and affect dose distributions in xray<br />
radiotherapy when a single beam is delivered. However, beams from<br />
multiple directions may cancel the dose perturbation by spatial<br />
averaging. These results encourage us to use seeds for tumor<br />
registration in 3D CRT, IMRT, and VMAT. Furthermore, especially in<br />
VMAT delivery after radioactive seed implantation, which has already<br />
been clinically employed as shown in Figure 2, there may be little<br />
deleterious effect by the seeds on dosimetric evaluation.<br />
PO168<br />
VALIDITY OF INTRAOPERATIVE INTERACTIVE PLANNING TECHNIQUE<br />
BASED ON ANATOMIC DISTRIBUTION OF PROSTATE CANCER<br />
O. Keisei 1 , N. Kohno 2 , Y. Okinaka 1 , Y. Okada 1 , K. Murata 2<br />
1<br />
Shiga University <strong>of</strong> Medical Science, Department <strong>of</strong> Urology, Otsu<br />
shi, Japan<br />
2<br />
Shiga University <strong>of</strong> Medical Science, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology, Otsu<br />
shi, Japan<br />
: Modern prostate brachytherapy is a highly<br />
effective treatment for localized prostate cancer. To obtain a high<br />
cure rate by prostate brachytherapy, it is important to provide a<br />
sufficient radiation dose everywhere cancer cells exist. There have<br />
been reports <strong>of</strong> lower radiation dose on anterior base. This has been<br />
justified because <strong>of</strong> the rare location <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer at the<br />
anterior base. We reviewed whole mounted prostatectomy specimens<br />
in our series to see the anatomic distribution <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer.<br />
Based on these results, we evaluated the validity <strong>of</strong> our current<br />
interactive intraoperative technique.<br />
: A total <strong>of</strong> 69 men with clinically localized<br />
prostate cancer were treated with radical prostatectomy at Shiga<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Medical Science between 2008 and 2011. Whole mounted<br />
prostatectomy specimens were analyzed for anatomic distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
prostate cancer. Extraprostatic extensions (EPE) and resection<br />
margins (RM) were studied, and their locations were classified into<br />
four quadrants [anteriorsuperior quadrant (ASQ), posteriorsuperior<br />
quadrant (PSQ), anteriorinferior quadrant (AIQ), posteriorinferior<br />
quadrant (PIQ)], and apex. Based on the results <strong>of</strong> the anatomical<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer, we evaluated our current interactive<br />
intraoperative technique by investigating postimplant dosimetry for<br />
four different regions <strong>of</strong> the prostate gland.<br />
: Among the 69 prostatectomy cases, EPE and/or RM were<br />
present in 33 cases (47.8%). The locations <strong>of</strong> EPE and/or RM were<br />
distributed with 11 cases (33.3%) in ASQ, <strong>12</strong> cases (36.3%) in AIQ, one<br />
case (3.0%) in PSQ, six cases (18.1%) in PIQ and three cases (9.0%) in<br />
apex. The postimplantation dose obtained by our current interactive<br />
intraoperative technique was: The mean V<strong>10</strong>0±95% confidence<br />
interval for the whole prostate, 97.5±0.5%; for ASQ, 96.2±1.3%; for<br />
PSQ, 97.6±0.7%; for AIQ, 99.0±0.7%; for PIQ, 97.7±0.9%. The mean<br />
D90±95% confidence interval for [or] the whole prostate, 180.4±4.4Gy;<br />
for ASQ, 175.0±6.9Gy; for PSQ, 181.2±6.6Gy; for AIQ, 202.2±7.6Gy; for<br />
PIQ, 181.2±5.5Gy.<br />
: The present data demonstrate the importance <strong>of</strong><br />
including treatment <strong>of</strong> the anterior portions <strong>of</strong> the prostate, not only<br />
AIQ, but also ASQ. Our current interactive intraoperative technique<br />
allows us to provide high quality implants covering the entire prostate<br />
with minimal morbidity.<br />
PO169<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY FOR YOUNG PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS. WHAT IS<br />
DIFFERENT FROM ELDER PATIENTS?<br />
Y. Yagi 1 , A. Ashikari 1 , R. Namitome 1 , T. Nishiyama 1 , K. Toya 2 , A.<br />
Yorozu 2 , S. Saito 1<br />
1<br />
National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Urology,<br />
Tokyo, Japan<br />
2<br />
National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Radioncology,<br />
Tokyo, Japan<br />
: This study is to evaluate clinical outcomes <strong>of</strong><br />
brachytherapy (BT) with I<strong>12</strong>5 seed implantation in young prostate<br />
cancer patients.<br />
: Between July 2005 and December 2008, 771<br />
patients underwent BT for cT13N0M0 prostate cancer at our<br />
institution. Of the total number <strong>of</strong> patients, 86 (11.2%) were aged 60 years old (elder<br />
group). Kaplan Meier analysis was performed to evaluate the<br />
biochemical progressionfree survival rate (BPFS), clinical progression<br />
free survival rate (CPFS) and overall survival rate (OS). The Phoenix<br />
definition was used to determine biochemical failure. Prostate<br />
specific antigen (PSA) bounce was defined as a rise <strong>of</strong> at least 0.4<br />
ng/ml with a spontaneous return to the prebounce level or lower.<br />
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) was used to<br />
investigate healthrelated quality <strong>of</strong> life (HRQOL).<br />
:<br />
The followup period was 6.4 to 75.1 (median 51.1) months. The BPFS<br />
rate in the young and elder groups at 5year was 82.1% and 92.5%,<br />
respectively (P = 0.006). The CPFS rate in the young and elder groups<br />
at 5year was 97.5% and 94.7%, respectively (P = 0.450). Of the 86<br />
patients in the young group, 13 patients matched the Phoenix<br />
definition <strong>of</strong> biochemical failure, however, only 2 patients showed<br />
clinical progression and the others were defined as PSA bounce. The<br />
PSA bounce rate in the young and elder groups at 3year was 46.7%<br />
and 26.1%, respectively (P = 0.027). The OS rate in the young and<br />
elder groups at 5year was <strong>10</strong>0% and 95.9%, respectively (P = 0.082).<br />
No one died <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer in young group and only one died elder<br />
group. HRQOL analysis with EPIC showed that urinary incontinence<br />
and sexual function were better in the young group than those in the<br />
elder group. Bowel and hormonal function were similar in both<br />
groups. A total <strong>of</strong> 52 patients in the elder group suffered from second<br />
primary cancer (SPC) after BT, but no SPC was seen in the young<br />
group. Nine out <strong>of</strong> 52 patients in the elder group were bladder or<br />
rectal cancer, which arose between 33 to 65 months after BT.<br />
: BT was equally effective in young prostate cancer<br />
patients under age <strong>of</strong> 60, but PSA bounce was more <strong>of</strong>ten observed in<br />
the young group. EPIC analysis showed that the young group had
S70 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
better outcomes <strong>of</strong> HRQOL. Concerning the incidence <strong>of</strong> SPC after BT,<br />
longer followup is necessary to reach the conclusion.<br />
PO170<br />
EXCLUSIVE IODINE <strong>12</strong>5 PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY. EXPERIENCE OF<br />
INSTITUT BERGONIÈ<br />
L. Thomas 1 , A. Chemin 1 , S. Belhomme 1 , O. Lasbareilles 1 , J.<br />
Mendiboure 2 , N. Houédé 3 , E. Descat 4 , D. Monnin 5 , P. Richaud 1<br />
1<br />
Institut Bergonié, Radiation Oncology, Bordeaux, France<br />
2<br />
Institut Bergonié, Biostatistics, Bordeaux, France<br />
3<br />
Institut Bergonié, Medical Oncology, Bordeaux, France<br />
4<br />
Institut Bergonié, Radiology, Bordeaux, France<br />
5<br />
Institut Bergonié, Anesthesiology, Bordeaux, France<br />
: Retrospective analysis <strong>of</strong> pts with prostate cancer<br />
treated with Iodine permanent implant. To describe biochemical<br />
failure free survival (BFFS), genitourinary toxicity and erectile<br />
dysfunction.<br />
: 302 patients (pts) with prostate cancer were<br />
treated at Institut Bergonié with permanent Iodine implant between<br />
June 2002 and December 2009. Patients were selected for<br />
brachytherapy according to usual criterias admitted (international and<br />
national recommendations). At the beginning, strand I<strong>12</strong>5 seeds<br />
'ONCURA' after intraoperative dosimetry with spot Nucletron were<br />
inserted manually with 'Utrecht' wings for 65 pts. From <strong>May</strong> 2005, a<br />
seed projector after 3D dosimetry peroperative treatment planning<br />
'First technique' was used for 237 pts. Inverse planning optimized<br />
dosimetry was incorporated (IPSA) since September 2006. Prescribed<br />
dose at the planning target volume (prostate) was 145 Gy. Every<br />
patient had a clinical and biochemical followup. Genitourinary and<br />
rectal toxicity were classified according to CTCAE V3 (Common<br />
Toxicities Criteria for Adverse Events) and using IPSS score<br />
(International Prostate Symptoms Score).<br />
: Mean age <strong>of</strong> pts was 64.6 years and mean pretreatment PSA<br />
was 6.97 ng/ml; 79.8% <strong>of</strong> pts (241 pts) were low risk prostate cancer,<br />
19.5% (59 pts) were intermediate risk and 2 pts were high risk; 83.2%<br />
(251 pts) were T1c, 15.6% (47 pts) T2a. Gleason score was less or<br />
equal to 6 in 88.8% (268 pts) and Gleason score was 7 (3+4) in only<br />
<strong>10</strong>.9% (33 pts). Mean IPSS score was 3.21 (014) and only <strong>12</strong> pts (4%)<br />
had an IPSS score > <strong>10</strong> < 15. Before treatment with brachytherapy,<br />
hormone deprivation was administered during a mean <strong>of</strong> 4 months for<br />
cytoreduction in 68 pts (22.5%). Dosimetric quality criterias fullfilled<br />
recommendations and intraoperative D90 Prostate was 180 Gy (mean<br />
and median) and D90 Prostate on CT scan at 30 days was respectively<br />
for mean and median dose 153.56 Gy and 156 Gy. Retention rate was<br />
6% (18 pts) during the period <strong>of</strong> the study and is evaluated to 2% per<br />
year since 2007. Overall urinary toxicity ³ G3 was reported in 8.6% (26<br />
pts), with only 1.6% G3 (4 pts) at <strong>12</strong> months after brachytherapy and<br />
1% G3 (2 pts) at 24 months after brachytherapy. Since 2007, no<br />
urinary toxicity G3 is reported. Incontinence rate was 0.5% at 24<br />
months (1 pt) after treatment. IPSS score at 6 months after treatment<br />
was > <strong>10</strong> in 22.5% (46 pts). Rectal toxicity G2 and G3 was recorded in<br />
overall 2.4% (7 pts). At 2 years after treatment, erectile dysfunction<br />
was present in 27.6% (43 pts). Followup is 45 months (IC 95%), 95.3%<br />
(286 pts) are alive without disease, 0.7% (2 pts) are dead cancer<br />
prostate related, 1.3% (4 pts) have presented distant metastasis and<br />
2.3% (7 pts) have presented a local relapse which has been salvaged<br />
for 5 pts by cœlioscopy robotic prostatectomy. Biochemical failure<br />
free survival at 36 and 48 months were respectively 95.8% and 94.7%<br />
according to Phoenix definition.<br />
: Iodine <strong>12</strong>5 monotherapy yields excellent results for pts<br />
with prostate cancer carefully and highly selected with acceptable<br />
urinary toxicity and relatively low erectile dysfunction.<br />
PO171<br />
DNA PLOIDY BASED ON ARCHIVED BIOPSY MATERIAL MAY CORRELATE<br />
WITH PSA RECURRENCE AFTER PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
M. Keyes 1 , M. MacAulay 2 , M. Hayes 3 , J. Korbelik 2 , D. Garner 2 , J.W.<br />
Morris 1 , B. Palcic 2<br />
1<br />
B.C. Cancer Agency Vancouver Centre, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />
Oncology, Vancouver BC, Canada<br />
2<br />
B.C. Cancer Agency Vancouver Centre, Department <strong>of</strong> Cancer<br />
Imaging, Vancouver BC, Canada<br />
3<br />
B.C. Cancer Agency Vancouver Centre, Department <strong>of</strong> Pathology,<br />
Vancouver BC, Canada<br />
: It has been postulated that DNA ploidy status as<br />
measured by Diagnostic DNA Image Cytometry (DNAICM) can predict<br />
the therapeutic outcome in prostate cancer. The objective <strong>of</strong> this<br />
study was to further explore whether DNA ploidy <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer<br />
cells can distinguish between patients with PSA failures and non<br />
failures treated with prostate <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>.<br />
: <strong>10</strong>06 uniformly selected low and intermediate<br />
risk patients received prostate brachytherapy between 20/7/98 to<br />
23/<strong>10</strong>/03 at the BCCA. Median followup is 73 months, and PSA<br />
recurrence at 7 years is 5.6%. Neither <strong>of</strong> the recognized dosimetry<br />
quality assurance factors (V<strong>10</strong>0 or D90) were able to distinguish<br />
between PSA failures and non failures. 47 patients with PSA failure<br />
were identified from this cohort and 47 controls matched using age,<br />
iPSA, clinical stage Gleason Score and use <strong>of</strong> hormone therapy and<br />
length <strong>of</strong> follow up. Out <strong>of</strong> the 90 specimens received from pathology<br />
departments across BC, 79 were successfully processed. 27 controls<br />
and 20 failures contained more than <strong>10</strong>0 tumor cells, and these were<br />
used for the final analysis. Tumor location in the tissue blocks was<br />
marked by a pathologist, the tissue prepared as a cell monolayer, and<br />
scanned.<br />
DNA content <strong>of</strong> each individual cell was determined by measuring<br />
their integrated optical densities (IOD). The nuclei for each case were<br />
separated into 13 separate previously validated ploidy groups (P1P13)<br />
based on their DNA content. The percentage <strong>of</strong> cells in each group<br />
was used to classify the samples. Linear discriminate function analysis<br />
was used for the statistical analysis.<br />
: Age, iPSA, clinical stage Gleason Score and use <strong>of</strong> hormone<br />
therapy and length <strong>of</strong> follow up between failures and non failures<br />
were well matched (Ttest, all p values NS). Non failure group<br />
however, had larger proportion <strong>of</strong> cores involved with cancer (Ttest<br />
p=0.0021). Using a single feature P2 (frequency <strong>of</strong> cells with DNA<br />
Index <strong>of</strong> 0.95 to 1.0) we could correctly recognise 70% <strong>of</strong> controls and<br />
80% <strong>of</strong> failures (MannWhitney U test p=0.0022).<br />
: DNA ploidy can correctly classify the majority <strong>of</strong> failures<br />
and nonfailures in this study. This suggests the possibility <strong>of</strong> failure<br />
patients likely having a different amount <strong>of</strong> genomic alterations, and<br />
potentially a more aggressive disease. The question arises whether<br />
knowing this information before brachytherapy, may call for more<br />
aggressive treatment upfront. DNA ploidy may be useful for<br />
separating patients for active surveillance from those warranting<br />
active management. A larger sample <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer cohort<br />
patients and validation on an external cohort will be necessary to<br />
further confirm our hypothesis.<br />
PO172<br />
CURRENT RISK CLASSIFICATION FOR PROSTATE CANCER DOES NOT<br />
ACCURATELY PREDICT SURVIVAL AFTER I<strong>12</strong>5 BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
L. Kerkmeijer 1 , E. Monninkh<strong>of</strong> 2 , M. Van Vulpen 1<br />
1<br />
U.M.C. Utrecht, Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />
2<br />
U.M.C. Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care,<br />
Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />
: Prediction <strong>of</strong> outcome in prostate cancer patients<br />
is usually based on risk classification systems including a low, medium<br />
and high risk category based on Tstage, PSA at diagnosis and Gleason<br />
score. The available risk classification systems are subject <strong>of</strong><br />
discussion, since outcome is based on biochemical recurrence rather<br />
than survival. Furthermore, these systems do not take into account<br />
the individual contribution <strong>of</strong> each clinical risk factor on outcome.<br />
The objective <strong>of</strong> the present study is to develop a model based on the<br />
individual clinical pretreatment parameters to predict survival in<br />
prostate cancer patients after I<strong>12</strong>5 prostate brachytherapy more<br />
accurately.<br />
: From 1989 to 2008, 1694 patients were<br />
treated with I<strong>12</strong>5 brachytherapy. For 1645 patients, all clinical<br />
pretreatment parameters and survival outcome were known. In the<br />
statistical package <strong>of</strong> R, clinical parameters including Tstage (T1,<br />
T2a, T2b and T2c), grade (1, 2 and 3), pretreatment PSA (continuous<br />
parameter) and age (continuous parameter) were related to the<br />
hazard <strong>of</strong> mortality by means <strong>of</strong> multivariate Cox regression analysis.<br />
To assess the discriminative accuracy <strong>of</strong> the model for prediction <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 71<br />
overall and disease specific mortality, the cstatistic was calculated<br />
and compared to the discriminative ability <strong>of</strong> the risk classification<br />
system described by Ash et al.<br />
: Of the 1645 patients analysed, 1441 (87.6%) were alive at<br />
time <strong>of</strong> the censor date (December 2008), 61 (3.7%) died <strong>of</strong> prostate<br />
carcinoma and 143 (8.7%) died <strong>of</strong> nonprostate carcinoma related<br />
death. Median followup time was 4.2 years. The cstatistic <strong>of</strong> our<br />
preliminary model for prediction <strong>of</strong> disease specific mortality was<br />
0.81 (SD 0.055), compared to 0.77 (SD 0.046) for the risk classification<br />
system by Ash et al. Our model showed a cstatistic <strong>of</strong> 0.69 (SD 0.047)<br />
for overall mortality against 0.61 (SD 0.045) for the system <strong>of</strong> Ash et<br />
al.<br />
: Current risk classification systems do not predict survival<br />
accurately. This is probably caused by the fact each clinical<br />
pretreatment factor in these systems has the same weight. Better<br />
prediction <strong>of</strong> survival can be achieved by enabling a different<br />
contribution to the predicted outcome <strong>of</strong> each clinical risk factor in<br />
the model, by using PSA as a continuous variable, and by adding<br />
patient age. This new model is a promising tool for physicians to<br />
predict prostate cancer related mortality prior to treatment. The<br />
predicted risks <strong>of</strong> mortality derived from the new model will be<br />
compared with the observed risks <strong>of</strong> mortality for calibration<br />
purposes. After internal validation, we will develop a nomogram for<br />
prediction <strong>of</strong> survival based on the abovementioned clinical<br />
pretreatment parameters.<br />
PO173<br />
IODINE<strong>12</strong>5 (I<strong>12</strong>5) LOW DOSE RATE (LDR) BRACHYTHERAPY FOR<br />
HIGHER RISK (HR) PROSTATE CANCER<br />
R. Conroy 1 , J. Malik 1 , P. Mandell 1 , R. Swindell 1 , P. Hoskin 2 , D.<br />
Bottomley 3 , J. Logue 1 , J. Wylie 1<br />
1<br />
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Oncology, Manchester,<br />
United Kingdom<br />
2<br />
Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Clinical Oncology, Middlesex, United<br />
Kingdom<br />
3<br />
St James' Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Clinical Oncology, Leeds, United<br />
Kingdom<br />
: LDR brachytherapy <strong>of</strong>fers dose escalation when<br />
compared to external beam radiotherapy alone. It is well established<br />
as monotherapy for patients with low risk (LR) prostate cancer with<br />
<strong>10</strong>year biochemical relapse free survival (bRFS) in different series <strong>of</strong><br />
around 90% with acceptable toxicity. It has been used increasingly in<br />
intermediate risk (IR) prostate cancer, but is not standard <strong>of</strong> care for<br />
high risk (HR) disease. We report the outcomes for a cohort <strong>of</strong> men<br />
with higher risk prostate adenocarcinoma treated with LDR<br />
brachytherapy in a multiinstitutional UK practice.<br />
: Data on patient demographics, dosimetry and<br />
biochemical outcome was obtained from the multiinstitutional<br />
prospective database for patients with higher risk disease treated<br />
between 20032007. High risk was defined as patients with ≥ 2<br />
D’Amico intermediate risk factors (PSA <strong>10</strong>20, GS 7 or clinical T2c) or<br />
≥1 high risk factor (PSA > 20, GS ≥ 8).<br />
KaplanMeier methods were used to estimate bRFS defined using both<br />
ASTRO Phoenix and ASTRO consensus definitions. A univariate analysis<br />
was performed to assess the significance <strong>of</strong> Gleason score, PSA, T<br />
stage, pre or postimplant dosimetry, and additional hormones on<br />
BRFS.<br />
: Two hundred and seventeen men with histologically<br />
confirmed adenocarcinoma <strong>of</strong> prostate were identified with median<br />
age 65 years (range 4379). Median follow up was 62 months (range<br />
14<strong>10</strong>2). All patients were treated with I<strong>12</strong>5 LDR brachytherapy;<br />
67(31%) patients had additional hormone treatment, median duration<br />
7 months (range 3 – 22), and no patients had additional EBRT.<br />
Preimplant dosimetry median V150 59.6 %( 43.789.8), medianV200<br />
20.1 %( 11.636) and postimplant dosimetry on 75 cases (35%),<br />
showed median D90 132.8Gy (range 75192Gy).<br />
The 3 and 5 year bRFS as defined by ASTRO Phoenix were 85.4% and<br />
74.4% and as defined by ASTRO consensus were 76.6% and 69.8%.<br />
On univariate analysis there were no statistically significant predictors<br />
<strong>of</strong> outcome.<br />
: These results show that good bRFS can be obtained with<br />
LDR brachytherapy alone. There was no additional benefit <strong>of</strong> adjuvant<br />
hormone therapy. These results appear comparable to other<br />
treatment modalities available to these patients. To determine the<br />
optimum therapy comparing LDR, HDR and other hyp<strong>of</strong>ractionated<br />
doseescalation regimes for these higher risk patients, randomised<br />
trials are required<br />
PO174<br />
HDR BRACHYTHERAPY BOOST FOR LOCALISED PROSTATE CANCER: THE<br />
FIRST 150 PATIENTS FROM THE SYDNEY CANCER CENTRE.<br />
D. Whalley 1 , N. Patanjali 1 , M. Jackson 1 , G. Perez 1 , M. Whittaker 1 , M.<br />
Chatfield 2 , G. Hruby 1<br />
1<br />
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Sydney NSW,<br />
Australia<br />
2<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney NSW,<br />
Australia<br />
: To report the toxicity and early efficacy <strong>of</strong> high<br />
dose rate brachytherapy (HDR) as a boost to external beam radiation<br />
(EBRT) in the treatment <strong>of</strong> localised prostate cancer.<br />
: Between December 2002 and July 20<strong>10</strong>, 150<br />
consecutive patients with intermediate or high risk prostate cancer<br />
were treated with EBRT (46Gy in 23 fractions) plus an HDR boost. The<br />
HDR boost was initially delivered over a 24 hour period in three<br />
fractions <strong>of</strong> 6.5Gy each via a single implant; this was subsequently<br />
modified to a tw<strong>of</strong>raction outpatient scehdule with separate implants<br />
two weeks apart. All but five patients also received androgen<br />
deprivation therapy for between 3 and 24 months.<br />
: Our cohort included <strong>10</strong>3 intermediate risk and 47 high risk<br />
patients. 83 patients received the three fraction regime and 67 two<br />
fractions. The dose <strong>of</strong> the tw<strong>of</strong>raction brachytherapy course was<br />
escalated over the time interval such that the initial patients received<br />
17Gy (8.5Gy per fraction), and the last five patients received 19Gy<br />
(9.5Gy per fraction). Median follow up was 52 months, at which time<br />
87% <strong>of</strong> patients were free from failure. The 4 year disease free<br />
survival (DFS) for intermediate and high risk groups was 95% and 69%<br />
respectively. Two patients developed metastatic disease. Three<br />
patients died during the follow up period, none <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer.<br />
Significant acute treatment toxicities included clot retention requiring<br />
overnight catheterisation and irrigation (15 patients), two traumatic<br />
urethral injuries, one case <strong>of</strong> retention requiring suprapubic catheter<br />
placement, and one case <strong>of</strong> new onset atrial fibrillation. Three cases<br />
<strong>of</strong> pulmonary emboli were also documented, all <strong>of</strong> which occurred in<br />
patients receiving the three fraction inpatient regime, despite<br />
prophylaxis with enoxaparin. At 4 years, the rate <strong>of</strong> late grade 2 or<br />
worse genitourinary (GU) toxicity was 13%; four patients experienced<br />
grade 3 GU toxicity. Five patients had grade 2 late GI toxicity. No late<br />
grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was observed. Potency was<br />
preserved in 64% <strong>of</strong> those patients reporting normal pretreatment<br />
sexual function.<br />
: Our series <strong>of</strong> patients treated with an HDR boost for<br />
localised prostate cancer reveals promising efficacy results at a<br />
median follow up <strong>of</strong> 4.3 years. The side effect pr<strong>of</strong>ile, with a<br />
predominance <strong>of</strong> GU rather than GI toxicity, is similar to other<br />
published reports.<br />
PO175<br />
CATHETER POSITION CONTROL IN HIGH DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
OF PROSTATE CANCER<br />
P. Marolt 1 , R. Hudej 1 , A. Bernik 2<br />
1<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Brachyradiotherapy, Ljubljana, Slovenia<br />
2<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Ljubljana, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences, Ljubljana,<br />
Slovenia<br />
: The success <strong>of</strong> fractionated high dose rate<br />
brachytherapy depends on the precise implantation and reproducible<br />
catheter positioning. Catheter displacements are <strong>of</strong>ten observed<br />
during fractionated treatments <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer, usually because <strong>of</strong><br />
periprostatic edema, which can be discovered with control imaging.<br />
The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to analyze catheter displacement during<br />
HDR brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer.<br />
: 25 patients were included in this study. Total<br />
number <strong>of</strong> cathethers was 377. On average, 15 needles were<br />
implanted per patient (range 11 to 19). All patients were imaged with<br />
MR for planning and with CT for the catheter position check before<br />
the last fraction. Distance from the tip <strong>of</strong> each catheter to gold
S72 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
marker along the catheter line was measured on MR and CT images.<br />
Catheter displacement was calculated as a difference between both<br />
measurements in caudal and cranial directions.<br />
: Absolute median value <strong>of</strong> catheter displacement was 1,9 mm<br />
(range: 15,1 to +8,7 mm; minus and plus signs indicate caudal and<br />
cranial directions, respectively) with 2,2 mm standard deviation. In<br />
one patient all catheter displacements were larger than the tolerance<br />
<strong>of</strong> 3 mm. In this case, patient accidentally pulled catheters out <strong>of</strong><br />
prostate. In ten patients the displacements <strong>of</strong> all catheters were<br />
smaller than tolerance.<br />
With our results we can confirm the results <strong>of</strong> other studies, that the<br />
majority <strong>of</strong> displacements are in the caudal direction. In our case 64%<br />
<strong>of</strong> catheters were shifted in caudal and 36% in the cranial direction.<br />
The shifts may be caused by physiological movements (e.g., amount<br />
<strong>of</strong> water in the bladder), pathology (edema) or artificially induced<br />
(template shifts, patient movements). Calculated values for<br />
displacements presumably include reconstruction errors as well.<br />
Particularly unreliable are catheter reconstructions on MR images in<br />
areas with low cathetertissue contrast, e.g., proximity <strong>of</strong> bladder<br />
wall. However, in the study this was not separately analyzed.<br />
In 84% <strong>of</strong> the patients no out <strong>of</strong> tolerance average catheter shifts<br />
were observed. In <strong>12</strong>% <strong>of</strong> the patients it was necessary to correct a<br />
plan or shift catheters, in 4% <strong>of</strong> patients complete implant was<br />
removed because shifts were too large to correct and the<br />
implantation was repeated 7 days later.<br />
: Catheter displacement is critical for treatment with high<br />
dose rate brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> prostate and should not be ignored.<br />
Without correction and replanning we risk under dosage <strong>of</strong> tumor and<br />
over dosage <strong>of</strong> <strong>org</strong>ans at risk. This study showed that 3D imaging is an<br />
important factor in planning and correcting the position <strong>of</strong><br />
brachytherapy catheters. Together with proper fixation, large<br />
catheter displacements can be avoided.<br />
PO176<br />
EFFICACY, TOXICITY AND DOSIMETRIC ASPECTS OF HDR<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY IN PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS: 5 YEARS<br />
EXPERIENCE<br />
T.M. Filipowski 1 , A. SzmigielTrzcinska 1 , J. TopczewskaBruns 1 , B.<br />
PancewiczJanczuk 2 , W. Nowik 2<br />
1 Bialostockie Centrum Onkologii, Radiotherapy, Bialystok, Poland<br />
2 Bialostockie Centrum Onkologii, Physics, Bialystok, Poland<br />
: To analyze efficacy, toxicity pr<strong>of</strong>ile and<br />
dosimetric aspects <strong>of</strong> radical brachytherapy HDR +/ teleradiotherapy<br />
in prostate cancer patients.<br />
: Between December 2006 and December 2011<br />
190 patients (pts) with prostate cancer (T1 –T2c) underwent<br />
conformal HDR brachytherapy (HDRBRT) with a temporary implant.<br />
The mean age <strong>of</strong> pts was 68 years, while mean PSA – 11,069 [ng/ml].<br />
Gleason score was observed from 3 to 7 and most <strong>of</strong> the patients<br />
received androgen deprivation. 60 patients received 30 Gy in 2<br />
fractions <strong>of</strong> HDR brachytherapy (21 days interval) and were treated to<br />
a dose <strong>of</strong> 30 Gy in 15 fractions with 3D external beam radiotherapy (3<br />
to 5 fields) on to the prostate region.130 patients were treated with<br />
exclusive HDRBRT 45 Gy in 3 fractions (21 days interval). HDR<br />
brachytherapy was delivered using an Iridum192 source<br />
(MicroSelectron, Nucletron) and treatment planning system: SWIFT<br />
2.11.8 and Oncentra Prostate 3.0.9/4.0 realtime treatment planning<br />
s<strong>of</strong>tware SWIFT incorporates inverse planning optimization. Dose<br />
volume constraints for this inverse planning system included: prostate<br />
V <strong>10</strong>0 ≥95 %, maximal urethral dose ≤ <strong>12</strong>0% and average rectal dose<br />
≤85% <strong>of</strong> the prescription dose. Patient were monitored weekly during<br />
radiotherapy and 1, 3, 6, 9, 15 months after the end <strong>of</strong> treatment and<br />
then at three months interval. Followup visit included clinical<br />
examination and PSA value assessment. The acute toxicities were<br />
graded according to the EORTC/RTOG scales.<br />
: Median follow up was 18 (603) months with 95% diseasefree<br />
survival rate. The most common urinary symptoms were: urinary<br />
urgency, urinary frequency, dysuria and nocturia in both treatment<br />
options. The rectal symptoms (rectal urgency, frequency and<br />
tenesmus) were rare. No grade 3 and 4 acute toxicities were<br />
recorded. Two death cases were reported during treatment. Overall<br />
survival and late toxicity data need longer followup.<br />
: HDRBRT is a valid treatment modality for patients with<br />
localized prostate cancer. HDRBRT has an important role in achieving<br />
dose escalation for the radical treatment <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer patients.<br />
The treatment was well tolerated by majority <strong>of</strong> patients with<br />
acceptable degree <strong>of</strong> acute toxicities. However, overall survival and<br />
late toxicity data need longer followup.<br />
PO177<br />
HISTOSCANNING BASED DOSE ESCALATION FOR PROSTATE CANCER AS<br />
MICROBOOST USING BRACHYTHERAPY A PHASE IITRIAL<br />
S. Lettmaier 1 , S. Kreppner 1 , M. Lotter 1 , R. Fietkau 1 , V. Strnad 1<br />
1<br />
University Hospital <strong>of</strong> Erlangen, Dept. <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Erlangen, Germany<br />
: The aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to selectively escalate<br />
the dose in tumour areas inside the prostate exploiting the<br />
capabilities <strong>of</strong>fered by imageguided interstitial PDR/HDR<br />
brachytherapy for finetuned dosepainting that allow the creation <strong>of</strong><br />
microboost volumes. The definition <strong>of</strong> tumour areas is based on a<br />
novel ultrasound approach HistoScanning TM . We report our first<br />
experiences regarding feasibility <strong>of</strong> this new approach.<br />
: Between the end <strong>of</strong> August 2011 and January<br />
20<strong>12</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 19 patients with prostate cancer have been treated<br />
according to the study protocol at our institution. Nonmetastatic<br />
patients with prostate cancer <strong>of</strong> any level <strong>of</strong> risk according to the D’<br />
Amico definition are eligible for inclusion. Depending on risk group<br />
temporary interstitial brachytherapy is used either as sole treatment<br />
(low risk) or in combination with EBRT (intermediate and high risk).<br />
The brachytherapy dose prescribed at the prostate capsule was 70 Gy<br />
(<strong>10</strong>0x 0,7Gy) or 38 Gy (4x 9,5 Gy) for sole PDR or HDRbrachytherapy,<br />
respectively and 35 Gy (50x 0,7Gy) or 19 Gy (2x 9,5 Gy) if PDR/HDR<br />
brachytherapy was used as boost following EBRT with 50,4 Gy. Dose<br />
escalation within the tumour areas as defined by HistoScanning (HR<br />
CTV ~ high risk CTV) aiming for V<strong>12</strong>0/HRCTV> 90% was always performed<br />
respecting the dose constraints <strong>of</strong> <strong>org</strong>ans at risk. Side effects will be<br />
assessed using the CTCVers.3, IPSS and IEFF scores as well as the<br />
QOL30 quality <strong>of</strong> life questionnaire. Tumour control will be<br />
monitored through regular PSA checks using the Phoenix definition to<br />
determine failure and correlated to HistoScanning reevaluations.<br />
Trial registration: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov:<br />
NCT01409876.<br />
: Analyzing the treatment plans <strong>of</strong> patients from the first 6<br />
months following the start <strong>of</strong> patient recruitment we can establish as<br />
fact, that dose escalation meeting the requirement that V<strong>12</strong>0/HRCTV be<br />
greater than 90% is possible. The median prostate volume was 30,8<br />
cm³ (range 16,5 71,2cm³); the median volume <strong>of</strong> tissue identified as<br />
tumour by HistoScanning (HRCTV) was 2,9cm³ (range 0,73 4,9cm³).<br />
The median values <strong>of</strong> V<strong>10</strong>0 and D90 for the prostate were 99% (range<br />
90 <strong>10</strong>0%) and 1<strong>12</strong>% (range <strong>10</strong>0 <strong>12</strong>2%), respectively. For the high risk<br />
areas as defined by HistoScanning (HRCTV) we obtained the following<br />
median values: D90=<strong>12</strong>4%, V<strong>12</strong>0=94% and V130=85%. A D90/HRCTV value<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>4% equates to physical dose values <strong>of</strong> 43,4 Gy and 11,8 Gy for a<br />
single PDR or HDR brachytherapy session (PDR 35 Gy, HDR 9,5 Gy),<br />
respectively. The corresponding total biological doses expressed as<br />
EQD2 and assuming α/ß=1 for HRCTV therefore range above <strong>10</strong>0 Gy.<br />
Early followup data up to 3 months fortunately document excellent<br />
tolerability without significant acute side effects – in particular there<br />
were no grade ≥3 toxicities.<br />
: Preliminary data show that using imageguided<br />
interstitial PDR/HDRbrachytherapy a significant dose escalation as<br />
microboost to the tumour regions <strong>of</strong> the prostate is possible while<br />
meeting stringent dose constraints for the adjacent <strong>org</strong>ans at risk.<br />
There seems to be no excessive acute toxicity. The study will<br />
continue.<br />
PO178<br />
PREDICTION OF ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION FOLLOWING PROSTATE<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY: A DOSE VOLUME ANALYSIS OF PENILE STRUCTURES<br />
C. Beaufort 1 , B. Hindson 1 , E. Paul 2<br />
1<br />
William Buckland Radiotherapy Centre, The Alfred, Melbourne,<br />
Australia<br />
2<br />
Monash University, Department <strong>of</strong> Epidemiology and Preventative<br />
Medicine, Melbourne, Australia<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 73<br />
: To identify if the dose to penile structures is a<br />
potential causative factor for severe erectile dysfunction following<br />
low dose rate brachytherapy (LDRB) for prostate cancer in men with<br />
normal pretreatment erectile function.<br />
: The post brachytherapy dosimetry CT<br />
datasets for 69 men with low risk prostate cancer treated between<br />
April 2004 and November 2007 were used. Patients with pre<br />
treatment moderate or poor erectile dysfunction were excluded. The<br />
penile bulb (PB), neurovascular bundle (NVB) and the penile crura<br />
(PC) were retrospectively volumed in a standardised manner and<br />
dosevolumetric parameters were generated.<br />
All patients had low or intermediate risk disease and received LDRB<br />
monotherapy. Four patients received hormone therapy. The dose<br />
prescribed was 145Gy and the dosimetery CT was undertaken at 4<br />
weeks post brachytherapy. All patients were followed prospectively<br />
using the International Index <strong>of</strong> Erectile Function (IIEF)<br />
questionnaires.<br />
For the analysis the patients were divided into a severe erectile<br />
dysfunction group (IIEF
S74 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
keep the maximum value <strong>of</strong> recommendations, therefore becoming<br />
135%.<br />
SPOTPRO and SeedSelectron from Nucletron were used to plan and<br />
automatically build and deliver the trains <strong>of</strong> seeds and spacers.<br />
Inverse planning using the implemented IPSA algorithm with minor<br />
manual adjustments were performed.<br />
DVH parameters <strong>of</strong> 50 patients treated with prostate permanent<br />
brachytherapy with 160 Gy <strong>of</strong> prescription dose are included. Volume<br />
ranges from 17.261.8 cc (average 31.4 std 9.5). D90 <strong>of</strong> prostate and<br />
D<strong>10</strong> together with Dmax for urethra have been analyzed.<br />
: For the urethra, D<strong>10</strong> results in <strong>12</strong>1.1% (average) with range<br />
99.1%140.4% and std 8.5%. Urethra Dmax is significantly higher, in<br />
average 135.3%, with range and std <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong>4.5%189.5% and 15.3%,<br />
respectively.<br />
For the prostate, D90 results in significantly higher than <strong>10</strong>0%, being<br />
in average 115%, with range <strong>10</strong>1.7%<strong>12</strong>8.9% and std 8.5%.<br />
Despite the implemented dose escalation, the urethra D<strong>10</strong> constraint<br />
is maintained according to ESTRO Recommendations, even with a<br />
prostate coverage larger than <strong>10</strong>0%. The advantage <strong>of</strong> the<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> non regular trains with loosed seeds using the<br />
SeedSelectron plus the IPSA inverse planning makes it feasible. It is<br />
pointed out by evaluating the ratio Urethra D<strong>10</strong> vs. Prostate D90<br />
resulting in average 1.05 with range and std <strong>of</strong> 0.881.23 and 0.06<br />
respectively.<br />
: Dose escalation at 160Gy while keeping the ESTRO<br />
recommended values in coverage and urethra constraint is feasible<br />
and efficient on clinical practice.<br />
PO182<br />
INTRAOPERATIVE REALTIME PLANNED PERMANENTSEED PROSTATE<br />
BT: IMPACT OF TRAINING PROGRAM AND LEARNING CURVE<br />
T. Zilli 1 , M. Alizadeh 1 , D. Taussky 1<br />
1 CRCHUM Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université<br />
de Montréal Hôpital Notre Dame, Radiation Oncology, Montréal,<br />
Canada<br />
: To assess the influence <strong>of</strong> two different<br />
fellowship training programs and the effect <strong>of</strong> learning curve on<br />
dosimetric outcome and genitourinary toxicity in threedimensional<br />
(3D) intraoperative (IO), permanentseed prostate brachytherapy<br />
(PB).<br />
: Between 2005 and 2011, 115 patients with<br />
localized prostate cancer were implanted by two investigators (I1 and<br />
I2) using TRUSguided, 3D IOinteractive planning with virtual needle<br />
guidance, robotic seed delivery, and needle retraction system. Eighty<br />
two percent <strong>of</strong> the patients (n=94) had a lowrisk and 18% (n=21)<br />
intermediaterisk prostate cancer. Median age at implant was 66 years<br />
(range 5178). PSA was
S76 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
kinetics, biochemical failurefree survival, life quality and<br />
intraoperative and postimplant dosimetry results.<br />
: From 2009 to 2011, we treated 56 patients<br />
diagnosed <strong>of</strong> lowrisk prostate adenocarcinoma with LDRBT as<br />
monotherapy, using permanent seeds under spinal anesthesia, using<br />
First System (Nucletron seedSelectron), with perineal insertion<br />
guided by transrectal ultrasound and real time planning. The<br />
prescribed dose for PTV (prostate + 5 mm margin) is 145 Gy.<br />
Ultrasound verification. Postimplant control by CT at 24 hours and<br />
dosimetry at 30 days. Patients are discharged the next day after the<br />
implant. Followup through quarterly PSA levels and life quality<br />
control (QLQ PR25) pre and postimplant.<br />
:With a mean followup <strong>of</strong> 20 months, the biochemical failure<br />
free survival rate is 98.2%/year, (biochemical relapse occurred in one<br />
patient, M1 bone) with an average number <strong>of</strong> seeds per implant: 67.51<br />
(5492); mean activity <strong>of</strong> 0,5317 cGy/cm2/h (0,46730,61<strong>10</strong>); D 90:<br />
118.23% (94,68 % <strong>12</strong>8,67 %), V<strong>10</strong>0: 97.5% (87,42 % <strong>12</strong>2,55 %), V150:<br />
69.4% (49,64% 82,67 %); Uretra_V150: 0; Rectum D2cc: 63.31% (44,47<br />
% <strong>12</strong>7,76 %). Acute toxicity (
S78 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
toxicities at 1 and 6 months after the boost regarding the<br />
fractionation scheme applied is presented in the Table 1.<br />
Table 1: Analysis <strong>of</strong> GU and GI complications observed at 1 and 6<br />
months after HDRB boost regarding the complication grade (CTCv3.0)<br />
and the different fractionation schemes.<br />
Complications GU GI<br />
Grades<br />
1 mth 6 mths 1 mth 6 mths<br />
0 59% 65% 83% 76%<br />
1 34% 35% 17% 23%<br />
2 6% 0% 0% 1%<br />
3 0% 0% 0% 0%<br />
4 1% 0% 0% 0%<br />
Fract. schemes<br />
G1 (18 Gy/3f) 24%* 65% 6% 50%<br />
G2 (18 Gy/2f) 56% 35% 53% 50%<br />
G3 (14 Gy/1f) 20% 41% <br />
p value 0.53 0.86 0.21 0.34<br />
* Percentages <strong>of</strong> complication among patients who developed GU<br />
and/or GI complications.<br />
GU: genitourinary complications; GI: gastrointestinal complications;<br />
Fract. Schemes: fractionation schemes.<br />
: From 02/2009 to 09/2011, while a significant physical<br />
dose escalation was performed (33% and <strong>10</strong>% between G1 vs G3 and<br />
G2 vs G3 respectively), no significant increasing <strong>of</strong> the GU and GI<br />
acute toxicities was observed.<br />
PO193<br />
HIGH DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY AS MONOTHERAPY FOR EARLY<br />
STAGE PROSTATE CANCER: TOXICITY AND EARLY RESULTS<br />
S. Aluwini 1 , P. van Rooij 1 , J. Praag 1 , P. Jansen 1 , C. Jauns 1 , W. Kirkels 2 ,<br />
I. KolkmanDeurloo 1<br />
1<br />
Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam,<br />
The Netherlands<br />
2<br />
Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Urology, Rotterdam, The<br />
Netherlands<br />
: The use <strong>of</strong> HDR Brach therapy (HDRBT) as<br />
monotherapy for early stage prostate cancer (PC) patients is<br />
increasing worldwide. We report our results on toxicity and clinical<br />
outcome after this regimen.<br />
: Between 2007 and 2011, 93 consecutive<br />
patients were treated with HDRBT for earlystage PC. Total dose was<br />
38 Gy in 4 fractions within 36 hours. Toxicity and Quality <strong>of</strong> life (QoL)<br />
was assessed prospectively using validated questionnaires.<br />
Biochemical Failure (BF) was determined according to the Phoenix<br />
definition.<br />
: Median FU was 25 months. Median pretreatment prostate<br />
volume was 32 cc. Median number <strong>of</strong> needles was 17. No Surgical<br />
complications were reported. The constraints regarding bladder,<br />
rectum, and urethra were well met.<br />
Biochemical failure occurred in 2 patients. The 3year actuarial<br />
biochemical control rate was 98%. Mean nadir PSA was 0.4 ng/ml.<br />
Median International prostate symptoms score (IPSS) was 6 before<br />
treatment and showed a median increase <strong>of</strong> 5 after 3 months, and<br />
remained stable afterward. The EORTC/RTOG toxicity scales showed<br />
grade ≥ 2 rectal toxicity, in 7%3%2%2% after 3<strong>12</strong>2436 months,<br />
respectively. Grade 3 rectal toxicity was reported in 3% at 3 months.<br />
There was no instance <strong>of</strong> late grade 3 rectal toxicity. Genitourinary<br />
(GU) grade ≥2 toxicity was seen in 7% 23%19%17% after 3<strong>12</strong>2436<br />
months, respectively. A grade 3 GU toxicity was seen in 6%3%2%,2%<br />
after 3<strong>12</strong>2436 months, respectively. Seven patients needed a<br />
temporary catheter shortly after the treatment. The 3 assessed<br />
domains (urinary, bowel and sexual) <strong>of</strong> the PR25 questionnaire did<br />
recover with the time.<br />
: HDRBT as monotherapy for favourablerisk prostate<br />
cancer was well tolerated with acceptable acute and late toxicity and<br />
excellent biochemical control after 3 years. Longer FU is still required<br />
to evaluate the efficacy<br />
PO194<br />
ULTRASOUNDCT FUSION COMPARED TO MRCT FUSION FOR POST<br />
IMPLANT DOSIMETRY IN PERMANENT PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
J.M. Crook 1 , C. Araujo 2 , M. Gaztanaga 1 , D. Batchelar 2 , D.M. Bowes 3<br />
1<br />
British Columbia Cancer Agency Center for the Southern Interior,<br />
Radiation Oncology, Kelowna B.C., Canada<br />
2<br />
British Columbia Cancer Agency Center for the Southern Interior,<br />
Radiation Physics, Kelowna B.C., Canada<br />
3<br />
Nova Scotia Cancer Center, Radiation Medicine, Halifax, Canada<br />
: Postplan evaluation is essential for quality<br />
assurance in prostate brachytherapy (BT). MRI has demonstrated<br />
greater interobserver consistency in prostate contouring compared<br />
with CT. Although a valuable tool in postimplant assessment, MRI is<br />
costly and not always available. Our purpose is to compare dosimetry<br />
obtained using fusion <strong>of</strong> postimplant CT to preimplant transrectal<br />
ultrasound (TRUS) vs. CTMR fusion.<br />
: 20 patients receiving permanent I<strong>12</strong>5 seed<br />
prostate BT underwent preimplant TRUS with urethrography, one<br />
month CT with a Foley catheter, and one month MRI. No patient<br />
received androgen deprivation or external beam radiotherapy. The<br />
prescription dose <strong>of</strong> I<strong>12</strong>5 implant monotherapy was 144 Gy. The pre<br />
implant TRUS and postimplant CT images were fused based on<br />
urethral position, and the CTTRUS images were subsequently fused to<br />
the MRI using a seedtoseed match. Dosimetric parameters for the<br />
USderived and MRderived prostate contours were compared.<br />
: There were no significant differences in D90, V<strong>10</strong>0, V150,<br />
and V200 when comparing dosimetry obtained using MRI and CTTRUS<br />
fusion. The mean absolute difference between dosimetry from MR<br />
imaging or CTTRUS fusion for D90 was 3.2% and in V<strong>10</strong>0 was 1.2%.<br />
Only 1 patient had a difference in MR and USderived D90 <strong>of</strong> > <strong>10</strong>%<br />
(11.4%) and only one had a difference in V<strong>10</strong>0 <strong>of</strong> > 5%. There were no<br />
implants in this group in which the D90 was less than 1<strong>10</strong>% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
prescription dose. Although volume differences appeared more<br />
substantial (11/20 > <strong>10</strong>%), the actual magnitude <strong>of</strong> the difference was<br />
small with a mean absolute difference as calculated between MR and<br />
US <strong>of</strong> only 3.0 cc (maximum 7.5 cc).<br />
Median value (IQ range) CTTRUS fusion CTMR fusion<br />
Volume 32.8 cc (25.8, 42.6) 31.1 cc (25.8, 37.6)<br />
D90 <strong>12</strong>0.0% (117.4, 132.2) <strong>12</strong>2.8% (115.0, 132.4)<br />
V<strong>10</strong>0 97.8% (95.4 ,98.9) 97.8% (94.9, 98.8)<br />
V150 71.5% (64.7, 75.6) 72.6% (62.7, 77.5)<br />
V200 37.2% (28.9, 41.2) 36.0 (26.6, 42.4)<br />
: Fusion <strong>of</strong> preimplant TRUS with 1month postimplant<br />
CT appears to lead to acceptable agreement with MRbased<br />
dosimetric parameters in postplan evaluation. TRUS based contours<br />
may be a reasonable option when MR is not available.<br />
PO195<br />
BIOCHEMICAL RESULTS FOR HIGH RISK PROSTATE CANCER AFTER HIGH<br />
DOSERATE BRACHYTHERAPY WITH EXTERNAL RADIOTHERAPY<br />
E. Arrojo Alvarez 1 , P.J. Prada 1 , L. Méndez 1 , J. Fernández 2 , H.<br />
González 1 , I. Jiménez 1<br />
1<br />
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Radiation Oncology,<br />
Oviedo, Spain<br />
2<br />
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Radiation Physics, Oviedo,<br />
Spain<br />
: We analyzed the longterm oncologic outcome for<br />
patients with high risk prostate cancer who were treated using high<br />
doserate conformal brachytherapy combined with external<br />
irradiation.<br />
: From June 1998 to August 2006, 252 patients<br />
with localized high risk prostate cancer were treated. The median<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 79<br />
followup was 74 months. Freedom from biochemical failure rates<br />
were calculated using the Phoenix definition. Toxicity was reported<br />
according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Event, Version<br />
4.0.<br />
: The biochemical control was 84% and 78% (SD ±2%) at 5 and<br />
<strong>10</strong> years respectively. The <strong>10</strong>year actuarial biochemical control was<br />
89% for patients with two intermediate risk criteria, 80% with one high<br />
risk criteria and 72% for patients with 23 high risk criteria (P = 0. 04).<br />
The <strong>10</strong> year cause specific survival was 93% (SD ±2%) and the overall<br />
survival was 88% and 78% (SD ±4%) at 5 and <strong>10</strong> years respectively. The<br />
multivariate Cox regression analyses identified, Gleason score as<br />
independent prognostic factors for biochemical failure and distant<br />
metastases.<br />
: External beam radiation therapy with conformal high<br />
dose rate brachytherapy boost for patients with high risk localized<br />
prostate cancer represents a considerable improvement over standard<br />
surgical and radiotherapy modalities.<br />
PO196<br />
NATURAL DOSE VOLUME HISTOGRAM: RELATION WITH VOLUME OF<br />
TARGET AND SEEDS PER NEEDLE IN PERMANENT PROSTATE IMPLANTS<br />
R. Martinez Cobo 1 , E. Rivin del Campo 2 , J.M. Roldán Arjona 1 , A.<br />
Palacios Eito 2<br />
1<br />
Reina S<strong>of</strong>ía University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Physics and<br />
Radiologic Protection, Cordoba, Spain<br />
2<br />
Reina S<strong>of</strong>ía University Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Cordoba, Spain<br />
: The Natural Dose Volume Histogram (NVDH)<br />
allows the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the implant quality (homogeneity <strong>of</strong> dose<br />
distribution and underdosage or overdosage <strong>of</strong> treated volume).<br />
This is a retrospective and descriptive analysis <strong>of</strong> results found when<br />
comparing different indexes obtained from NDVH (Uniformity Index<br />
(UI), Quality Index (QI) and Natural Dose Ratio (NDR)) with the volume<br />
<strong>of</strong> the target and the number <strong>of</strong> seeds per needle. The objective <strong>of</strong><br />
this study is to find differences in these indexes in relation to the<br />
volume <strong>of</strong> the target and the number <strong>of</strong> seeds per needle used in the<br />
implant.<br />
: The reviewed data belongs to treatments<br />
performed between 200720<strong>12</strong>. The prescribed dose to the volume <strong>of</strong><br />
the target was 145 Gy and the V150 to urethra was restricted to 0.00<br />
cm 3 . The manufacturer <strong>of</strong> the radioactive sources (I<strong>12</strong>5) provides 14<br />
possible source activities, <strong>of</strong> which only four types have been used.<br />
The equipment used in the implants is known as FIRST (Nucletron).<br />
This system has a planning program (SPOT PRO v3.0) with which the<br />
parameters <strong>of</strong> NDVH and volumes <strong>of</strong> the target have been calculated.<br />
To study the relationship between the indexes obtained from the<br />
NDVH with both the volume <strong>of</strong> the target and the number <strong>of</strong> seeds per<br />
needle, implants were divided into three groups according to the<br />
values <strong>of</strong> these two parameters. The chosen cut<strong>of</strong>f values allowed a<br />
similar distribution <strong>of</strong> individuals in each group. For the volume <strong>of</strong> the<br />
target, the first group included target volumes under 21 cm 3 , the<br />
second group between 21 and 28 cm 3 and the third group above 28<br />
cm 3 . Regarding the number <strong>of</strong> seeds per needle, the first group<br />
contains individuals with a less than 2.75, the second group between<br />
2.75 and 3.1 and the third group above 3.1.<br />
: The results for the mean value <strong>of</strong> each parameter <strong>of</strong> NDVH<br />
depending on the volume <strong>of</strong> the target are shown in Table 1. The<br />
results for the mean value <strong>of</strong> each parameter <strong>of</strong> NDVH in relation to<br />
the number <strong>of</strong> seeds per needle are represented in Table 2.<br />
: These results indicate that there is a statistically<br />
significant difference in NDVH depending on the volume <strong>of</strong> the target,<br />
finding the best results in both homogeneity <strong>of</strong> spatial dose<br />
distribution and in coverage <strong>of</strong> the volume <strong>of</strong> the target in larger<br />
volumes <strong>of</strong> the target. These differences could be considered<br />
selection criteria to determine the best candidates for a permanent<br />
prostate implant. In the case <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> seeds per needle, the<br />
value <strong>of</strong> the NDR in NDVH is significantly different depending on the<br />
group considered, obtaining better values when the number <strong>of</strong> seeds<br />
per needle increases. A trend towards a better implant quality was<br />
found, based on the QI and UI results, when the number <strong>of</strong> seeds per<br />
needle is higher.<br />
PO197<br />
HIGH DEFINITION CUSTOMISED BRACHYTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE<br />
CANCER BASED ON TRANSPERINEAL SECTOR MAPPING BIOPSIES<br />
S.L. Morris 1 , M. McGovern 2 , R. Tsung 3 , S.L. Aldridge 2 , B. Challacombe 3 ,<br />
R.B. Beaney 1 , R.B. Popert 3<br />
1 Guys Hospital London UK, Clinical Oncology, London, United Kingdom<br />
2 Guys Hospital London UK, Physics, London, United Kingdom<br />
3 Guys Hospital London UK, Urology, London, United Kingdom<br />
: Customised dose prescription for prostate LDR<br />
brachytherapy is possible and it has been shown that higher doses<br />
improve biochemical control. Transperineal sector mapping biopsies<br />
(TPSMB) can identify areas <strong>of</strong> dominant intraprostatic involvement.<br />
This planning study investigates the feasibility <strong>of</strong> dose escalation<br />
during brachytherapy planning to the dominant involved sectors<br />
: This study was carried out on the<br />
brachytherapy plans <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> patients treated with our real time dynamic<br />
dose feedback (4D) technique. All patients with low risk prostate<br />
cancer underwent a pre implant MRI scan and Transperineal sector<br />
mapping biopsy (TPSMB) to assess their suitability for either Active<br />
Surveillance or <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> and to exclude any adverse features not<br />
identified on the Transrectal biopsy. The TPSMB provides information<br />
on the apico to basal and medial to lateral distribution <strong>of</strong> tumour<br />
within the prostate based upon 8 sectors. The dynamic plans were<br />
created using the Variseed 8 s<strong>of</strong>tware. A protocol for outlining the<br />
sectors biopsied; right and left apex, right and left mid gland in<br />
anterior and posterior sectors and right and left base was developed<br />
to match the sector mapping technique. Depending upon the<br />
histological involvement dominant sectors were boosted to > 200Gy,<br />
whilst maintaining the conventional prostate brachytherapy dose<br />
constraints.<br />
: The planning study showed that dominant sectors can be<br />
boosted to > 200Gy while keeping within the standard constraints. The<br />
example below is <strong>of</strong> a patient where the right posterior sector showed<br />
the highest number <strong>of</strong> cores and % <strong>of</strong> core involvement on biopsy. The<br />
customised plan allowed boosting <strong>of</strong> this sector to a D90 <strong>of</strong> 248.8Gy,<br />
while the whole Prostate D90 was 180.9Gy, V200 <strong>of</strong> 32.9%, Rectal<br />
V<strong>10</strong>0 <strong>of</strong> 0.8cc, D2cc <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>2.8Gy, D0.1cc <strong>of</strong> 184Gy and Urethral V140 <strong>of</strong><br />
0.01%, D30% <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>7.8Gy, D<strong>10</strong>% <strong>of</strong> 130.9Gy.
S80 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
Fig 1 Dose distribution <strong>of</strong> sector boost mid prostate:<br />
: Customised dose escalation to dominant sector<br />
involvement in the prostate with brachytherapy is possible and needs<br />
to be tested in the clinical setting.<br />
PO198<br />
COMPARISON OF TREATMENT PLAN PARAMETERS IN BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
OF PROSTATE CANCER IN DIFFERENT SCHEDULES<br />
M. Kanikowski 1 , J. Skowronek 1 , A. Chichel 1<br />
1 Greater Poland Cancer Centre, <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Poznan, Poland<br />
: Radiotherapy (EBRT and HDRBT) in prostate<br />
cancer treatment seems to be nowdays as effective as surgery<br />
procedure. High dose rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) can be applied as a<br />
single modality treatment in patients from low and intermediate risk<br />
group with localized tumors. High dose rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) is<br />
very usefull in high risk group patients, in increasing prostate dose<br />
after EBRT (boost) which shortens whole radiation treatment. There is<br />
no clear recommendations about doses and schemes <strong>of</strong> combined<br />
radiation treatment (EBRTBT). The aim <strong>of</strong> this work was to make<br />
comparison <strong>of</strong> dosevolume parameters beetween (HDRBT) fractions,<br />
in patients prostate cancer treated in two combined with external<br />
beam radiotherapy schedules and one monotherapy.<br />
: <strong>10</strong>3 patients were enrolled to the study and<br />
divided to groups according to radiation schemes (I – EBRT 50 Gy/BRT<br />
1 x 15 Gy, II – EBRT 46 Gy/BRT 2 x <strong>10</strong> Gy, III – BRT 3 x 15 Gy) Group I,<br />
II, III consisted <strong>of</strong> 37 (35,92%), 36 (34,95%), 30 (29,13%) patients<br />
respectively. The mean value <strong>of</strong> D90 (reference dose given to 90% <strong>of</strong><br />
volume) was 90,86%, 88,23% and 92,03% respectively to each group.<br />
Hot spots parameters in target volume (V200, V150, V<strong>12</strong>0, Dmax) were<br />
found respectively: I – 15,22%, 41,48%, 69,47%, 1192,46%, II – 16,31%,<br />
40,09%, 66,61%, 1906,19%, III 14,97%, 39,3%, 67,53%, 1182,16%. Mean<br />
urethral D<strong>10</strong> (dose given to <strong>10</strong>% <strong>of</strong> urethral volume) was estabilished<br />
on respectively: <strong>12</strong>2,32%, <strong>12</strong>3,48% and <strong>12</strong>0,37%. Mean values <strong>of</strong> high<br />
doses parameters for urethra (Dmax, V<strong>10</strong>0, Dmean) were as follows<br />
respectively for I group: 143,18%, 53,76%, 90,23%, for II: 144,7%,<br />
53,76%, 97,34% and for III: 140,79%, 46,57%, 86,79%. Mean rectal D<strong>10</strong><br />
dose was estimated as 62,19% (I), 63,8 (II), 65,21% (III). According to<br />
parameters Dmax (90,76% I, 90,85% II, 84,68% III), V<strong>10</strong>0 (0,43% I,<br />
0,23% II, 0,18% III), Dmean (46,06% I, 46,27% II and 49,35% III)<br />
were found as a hot spots in rectum volume. Comparison <strong>of</strong> dose<br />
volume parameters was done by KruskalWallis and MannWhitney<br />
tests.<br />
: After statistical comparison we observed higher values <strong>of</strong><br />
high target doses (V200, Dmax) in the second group <strong>of</strong> patients.<br />
Parameter V<strong>12</strong>0 was the only one with statistical significance in<br />
KruskalWallis test (p=00264). According to these changes, parameters<br />
<strong>of</strong> target doses like D90 (87,76%) and V<strong>10</strong>0 (82,5%) were lower in II<br />
than the other groups (without statistical significance). The urethral<br />
high dosevolume parameters were much higher in 46/ 2 x <strong>10</strong> Gy<br />
group D<strong>10</strong> (<strong>12</strong>3,48%), Dmean (97,69%), V<strong>10</strong>0 (54,2%), also without<br />
statistical significance. In the second group parameter Dmax (90,95%)<br />
for another <strong>org</strong>ans at risk (rectum) was the highest and with smallest<br />
value <strong>of</strong> SD parameter (<strong>10</strong>,83%) can increase risk <strong>of</strong> serious<br />
complications in this localization.<br />
: 1. HDR brachytherapy parameters in prostate cancer<br />
treatment are not statistically different in most treatment schedules.<br />
2. HDR brachytherapy schedule with two lower doses fractions was<br />
less correct in terms <strong>of</strong> treatment planning system constraints. 3. To<br />
confirm differences between each treatment schedule a comperative<br />
investigation in larger groups is needed. 4. To confirm value <strong>of</strong><br />
treatment parameters comparison observation <strong>of</strong> results and<br />
complications is also needed.<br />
PO199<br />
PROSTATE VOLUMEBASED NOMOGRAMS FOR PROSTATE SEED<br />
IMPLANTS: CUSTOMIZING FOR A RANGE OF SEED ACTIVITIES<br />
S.J. Gardner 1 , K.L. Chapman 1 , A.P. Dicker 1 , T.N. Showalter 1 , L.A.<br />
Doyle 1<br />
1<br />
Jefferson Medical College <strong>of</strong> Thomas Jefferson University, Radiation<br />
Oncology, Philadelphia, USA<br />
: The use <strong>of</strong> a nomogram to predict the number <strong>of</strong><br />
seeds needed for an intraoperative prostate seed implant is common<br />
in radiation oncology. One such nomogram for I<strong>12</strong>5 implants,<br />
developed by Wu et al., relates prostate volume to I<strong>12</strong>5 activity<br />
without specifying the activity per seed. In this study, we evaluate<br />
treatment plans for 22 consecutive patients, with one plan for each <strong>of</strong><br />
4 seed activities (0.3, 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6 mCi; 88 total plans), to<br />
determine appropriate nomograms across a range <strong>of</strong> seed activities.<br />
: Treatment plans were generated for 22<br />
patients using intraoperative ultrasound images. Treatment plans<br />
were generated using Variseed 8.0.1 s<strong>of</strong>tware and Bard STM <strong>12</strong>51 I<br />
<strong>12</strong>5 seeds, using four activities (0.3 mCi, 0.4 mCi, 0.5 mCi, and 0.6<br />
mCi) with a modified peripheral loading technique. The seed<br />
activities were chosen based on the normal range <strong>of</strong> seed activity for<br />
permanent prostate seed implants (0.30.8 mCi), as specified by AAPM<br />
Task Group 64. The dose calculation was performed according to 1D<br />
TG43 formalism. The nominal treatment prescription dose was 145<br />
Gy to greater than 98% <strong>of</strong> the prostate. Additional planning<br />
constraints included D_PTV(90%)>170 Gy, D_PTV(150%)
S82 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
: Permanent <strong>12</strong>5 I seed BT is a successful and established<br />
treatment <strong>of</strong> earlystage prostate cancer. Although this sample<br />
represents the learning curve <strong>of</strong> our institution the outcomes are<br />
similar to the literature.<br />
PO202<br />
LONG TERM RESULTS WITH MULTIMODALITY RADIOTHERAPY (3D, IGRT,<br />
LDRBT, HDRBT) IN PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA<br />
S. Rodríguez Villalba 1 , M. Santos Ortega 1 , M. Deppiagio 1 , J. Pérez<br />
Calatayud 1 , J. Richart 1 , F. Ballester 2<br />
1<br />
Clinica Benidorm, Radiation Oncology, Benidorm, Spain<br />
2<br />
Valencia University, Atomic Molecular and Nuclear Physicist,<br />
Valencia, Spain<br />
: A retrospective analysis is made evaluating the<br />
toxicity and efficacy <strong>of</strong> different multimodality radiotherapy<br />
approaches for <strong>org</strong>an confined prostate cancer in our Institution with<br />
a minimum followup <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong> months.<br />
: From September 2004 to December 20<strong>10</strong> we<br />
have treated in our Department with a radical treatment 262<br />
patients. Our protocol has been based with uniformity on the risk<br />
classification <strong>of</strong> prostate adenocarcinoma. It includes external<br />
radiotherapy (extRT)(3D or IGRT) or LDRBT in low risk patients, IGRT<br />
or combined treatment (3D over prostate and seminal vesicles+<br />
LDRBT) in intermediate risk patients and IGRT or combined treatment<br />
(IMRT over pelvis and HDRBT) in high risk patients. 48 p (18.3%) have<br />
been treated with extRT3D, 58p(22%) with IGRT, 68p (26%) with<br />
LDRBT, 59 p (22.5%) with combined 3D + LDRBT and 29p (11.1%) with<br />
combined IMRT and HDRBT. Median age 71 years (4687 y). Median PSA<br />
at diagnostic 9.74 ng/ml (2.5 500 ng/ml). Median Gleason 6 (29). 75<br />
p (29%) were included in low risk (LR), 97 (37%) intermediate risk (IR)<br />
and 90 (34%) in high risk (HR).<br />
: The local control have been reach in 254 p (97%). All patients<br />
treated with IGRT, 3D+ LDRBT and IMRT + HDRBT are under local<br />
control. Two patients treated with 3D and 6 p (9%) treated with<br />
LDRBT exclusively have local failure. The local failure have been<br />
produced in 1 patient treated with 7200 cGy and 1p treated with 7560<br />
cGy.<br />
Biochemical failure have been reached in 8p (3%). 2p (0.8%) <strong>of</strong> LR, 4<br />
(1.5%) IR and 2p (0.8%) <strong>of</strong> HR<br />
We have evidenced lymph node failure in 6p (2%). One p (0.4%) <strong>of</strong> IR<br />
and 5p (1.9%) <strong>of</strong> HR. 3p treated with extRT3D (1%), 2p IGRT (0.8%) and<br />
1 p with 3D+ LDRBT (0.4%).<br />
Distance failure in 13p (5%).5p (1.9%) <strong>of</strong> IR and 8 p (3.1%) <strong>of</strong> HR. 6 p<br />
treated with extRT3D (3.3%), 4 with IGRT (1.6%), 1 with LDRBT (0.4%)<br />
and 2 with 3D+ LDRBT (0.8%).<br />
The toxicity evaluated is:<br />
GENITOURINARY (GU) TOXICITY # TREATMENT<br />
GRADE 3<br />
Hematuria 4 p 3 p IGRT and 1p with 3D+<br />
(1.5%) LDRBT<br />
Cystitis 1p IGRT<br />
(0.4%)<br />
Urinary obstruction 3p 1p IGRT and 2p LDRBT<br />
(1.1%)<br />
Urethral stenosis 4p<br />
(1.5%)<br />
Increased <strong>of</strong> the urinary frequency 2p<br />
(0.8%)<br />
Urinary retention 2p<br />
(0.8%)<br />
GASTROINTESTINAL (GI) TOXICITY<br />
GRADE 3<br />
Diarrhea 1p<br />
(0.4%)<br />
Rectitis 23p<br />
(8.8%)<br />
2p IGRT and 2p 3D +<br />
LDRBT<br />
1p IGRT and 1p 3D +<br />
LDRBT<br />
IMRT and HDRBT<br />
IGRT<br />
IGRT<br />
Median time for GU toxicity 3 months (148 months).<br />
Median time for GI toxicity <strong>10</strong>.5 months (040 months).<br />
Only one patient treated with 3D+ LDRBT had rectitis grade 3. This<br />
patient was treated previously <strong>of</strong> an embolism <strong>of</strong> an iliac aneurism<br />
several years ago with changes in the vascular drainage).<br />
At the end <strong>of</strong> the followup, December <strong>of</strong> 20<strong>10</strong>, 216 p (82%) are alive<br />
without any evidence <strong>of</strong> disease, 4 p (1.5%) are alive with Biochemical<br />
failure, 18 (7%) have died <strong>of</strong> an intercurrent disease, 4 (1.5%) have<br />
loose <strong>of</strong> control, 13 p (5%) live with active prostate disease and 7 (3%)<br />
have died <strong>of</strong> prostate tumor. The median followup is 35.5 months (5<br />
88 months)<br />
: Despite the good outcomes obtained with the different<br />
radiotherapy approaches our results shows a better disease control<br />
with more intensive radiotherapy doses. In our experience,<br />
combination modalities with BT techniques achieve more intensity<br />
treatments with lesser toxic <strong>events</strong>, mainly related to gastrointestinal<br />
damage.<br />
PO203<br />
RECTUM PRESERVATION BY BOLUS HYALURONAN INJECTION INTO<br />
PERI/PARA RECTAL SPACE DURING HDRBT OF PROSTATE CANCER<br />
K. Kishi 1 , M. Sato 1 , Y. Noda 1 , T. Sonomura 1 , S. Shirai 1 , R. Yamada 2<br />
1<br />
Wakayama Medical University, Radiation Oncology, Wakayama City,<br />
Japan<br />
2<br />
Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Urology, Kishiwada City, Japan<br />
: To evaluate feasibility and effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />
nativetype hyaluronate gel injection (HGI) to reduce the rectal dose<br />
during high dose rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDRBT) <strong>of</strong> prostate<br />
cancer, by comparing HGI and control groups.<br />
: From Jun 2006 to September 2008, 40<br />
patients with T2aT3a prostate cancer were treated with a combined<br />
schedule <strong>of</strong> 50Gy <strong>of</strong> external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by<br />
HDRBT. 17 patients underwent bolus HGI into anterior part <strong>of</strong><br />
perirectal space. The other 23 including 17 with matched prostate<br />
size were randomly sampled for control from database in the same<br />
period.<br />
: The HGI procedure was easily performed and took approx.<br />
ten minutes. There were no procedurerelated complications. By HGI,<br />
the rectum was shrunken and shifted posteriorly. The minimum<br />
rectoprostate distance was increased from 0.3±0.4 to 2.6±0.7cm<br />
(mean ±sd) after gel injection, and shrunk the rectum volume behind<br />
the prostate level decreases to 21.7±7.6% <strong>of</strong> the original size, and<br />
further gas inflation <strong>of</strong> the rectum was blocked. <strong>12</strong>.46Gy±2.14 bid was<br />
prescribed in control group and 14.52Gy±2.0 in single fraction in HGI<br />
group (p
S84 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
hyp<strong>of</strong>ractionated radiotherapy or highdoserate brachytherapy (HDR<br />
BT) regimens using appropriate radiation doses are expected to<br />
improve the local control rate for localized prostate cancer. However,<br />
the increase in the total biological effective dose (BED) may cause an<br />
increase in the severity and incidence <strong>of</strong> normal tissue complications.<br />
The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to investigate if the clinical and<br />
dosimetric factors affected the incidence <strong>of</strong> rectal bleeding after<br />
HDRBT combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).<br />
: The records <strong>of</strong> 150 patients with localized<br />
prostate cancer treated by HDRBT combined with EBRT at Kochi<br />
Medical School Hospital between November 2004 and December 2008<br />
were analyzed. The fractionation schema for HDRBT and EBRT was<br />
prospectively changed. The distribution <strong>of</strong> the fractionation schema<br />
used in the patients was as follows: 9 Gy x 2 + 2 Gy x 20 (BED1.5 = 219<br />
Gy, BED3 = 139 Gy) in 59 patients (Group 1); and 9 Gy x 2 + 3 Gy x 13<br />
(BED1.5 = 243 Gy, BED3 = 150 Gy) in 91 patients (Group 2). The median<br />
followup duration was 49months (range 24 – 61 months). The<br />
toxicities were graded based on the National Cancer Institute<br />
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. The clinical<br />
and dosimetric factors affecting the incidence <strong>of</strong> Grade 2 or worse<br />
late rectal bleeding were analyzed by statistical analyses.<br />
: Fifteen (<strong>10</strong>.0 %) and 2 (1.3 %) patients developed Grade 2 and<br />
3 rectal bleeding, respectively. Seven out <strong>of</strong> 59 (11.9 %) patients<br />
belonged to Group 1 and <strong>10</strong> out <strong>of</strong> 91 (11.0 %) patients belonged to<br />
Group 2 developed Grade 2 or worse rectal bleeding. There was no<br />
statisticallysignificant correlation between the incidence <strong>of</strong> Grade 2<br />
rectal bleeding and dose escalation. Regarding the correlation with<br />
dosimetric factors, no significant differences were found in the means<br />
<strong>of</strong> V<strong>10</strong>, V30, V50, V70, V75, V90, D0.1cc, D0.2cc, D0.5cc, D1cc, D2cc,<br />
D5cc, and D<strong>10</strong>cc between those with bleeding and those without in<br />
each Group. Grade 2 or worse rectal bleeding occurred in 6 out <strong>of</strong> 31<br />
(19.4 %) patients receiving the antiplatelet therapy, while it occurred<br />
in 11 out <strong>of</strong> 119 (9.2%) patients without a history <strong>of</strong> antiplatelet<br />
therapy, and Grade 2 or worse rectal bleeding occurred much more in<br />
the patients receiving the antiplatelet therapy than those without a<br />
history <strong>of</strong> antiplatelet therapy, however it was no statistically<br />
significant difference between two groups.<br />
: Dose escalation could be performed without severe<br />
rectal bleeding in HDRBT combined with EBRT. HDRBT combined<br />
with EBRT is possible to perform to even the patient receiving the<br />
antiplatelet therapy. However, further investigation will be needed.<br />
PO208<br />
QUALITY OF HDR BRACHYTHERAPY OF FAVORABLE LOCALIZED<br />
PROSTATE CANCER AND NUMBER OF IMPLANTED NEEDLES<br />
E. Slobina 1 , D. Kozlovsky 1 , A. Soroka 1 , Y. Ezhgurova 2<br />
1<br />
N.N. Alexandrov National Cancer Center <strong>of</strong> Belarus, Radiotherapy,<br />
Minsk, Belarus<br />
2<br />
Minsk Regional Oncology Dispensar, Radiotherapy, Minsk, Belarus<br />
: To assess the dependence <strong>of</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> 192 Iridium<br />
HDR interstitial imageguided brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> localized prostate<br />
cancer with favorable prognostic factors from number <strong>of</strong> implanted<br />
needles.<br />
: Between February 2007 and December 2011 a<br />
total <strong>of</strong> 60 previously healthy patients, Table 1, with favorable<br />
prognostic factors (Gleason score ≤ 7, PSA ≤ <strong>10</strong> ng/ml) and biopsy<br />
proven adenocarcinoma. HDR brachytherapy was performed by<br />
conformal imageguided transperineal HDR brachytherapy with real<br />
time planning.<br />
<br />
Mean age (years) 69<br />
Age range (years) 4581<br />
Stage T2N0M0 60<br />
Histology<br />
Adenocarcinoma 60<br />
Gleason score 3 20<br />
4 5<br />
5 31<br />
6 4<br />
Median pretreatment PSA 8.2 ng/ml<br />
<br />
Table 1. Study population.<br />
The total dose was 34.5 Gy/3 fractions (3 consecutive fractions with 2<br />
week gap between <strong>of</strong> each were performed), the dose per fraction<br />
was 11.5 Gy. The median followup was 16 months (range 3 44<br />
months). <strong>12</strong> patients received temporary androgen deprivation<br />
starting 29 month before brachytherapy.<br />
Cumulative dosevolume histograms <strong>of</strong> 180 plans were evaluated. The<br />
plans were divided into 3 groups in dependence <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong><br />
implanted active needles: < 16 (1 st group); 16–18 needles (2 nd group);<br />
> 18 (3 rd group). Dose volume parameters for target and quality<br />
indices were calculated. Maximal dose in reference points for urethra<br />
and rectum were determined.<br />
: There was no evidence <strong>of</strong> distant metastases, biochemical or<br />
clinical failure. All 60 patients experienced some degree <strong>of</strong> acute<br />
urinary toxicity, Table 2. However, chronic reactions are absent. The<br />
median first posttreatment PSA was 0.89 ng/ml (range 2.860.04<br />
ng/ml).<br />
<br />
Acute toxicity Number <strong>of</strong><br />
patients<br />
<br />
RTOG grade I 35<br />
RTOG grade II 25<br />
RTOG grade III 0<br />
RTOG grade IV 0<br />
<br />
Table 2. Acute urinary toxicity results.<br />
Mean <strong>of</strong> maximal dose in reference points for urethra was 117.78% –<br />
1 st group, 115.4% – 2 nd , 116.19% – 3 rd group. Mean <strong>of</strong> maximal dose in<br />
reference points for rectum was 82.44% – 1 st group, 82.2% – 2 nd , 84.48%<br />
– 3 rd group. The difference between groups were observed in following<br />
parameters: more needles was implanted in inverse dependence from<br />
volume <strong>of</strong> prostate (Vpr) for three groups (mean Vpr: 81,46 cm 3 , 60,73<br />
cm 3 , 51,9 cm 3 , respectively). There were no significant difference in<br />
other parameters.The number <strong>of</strong> 16–18 implanted needles in most<br />
cases provide optimal dosimetric acceptable volumetric dose<br />
distribution in HDR brachytherapy plan.<br />
: The treatment by interstitial HDR brachytherapy <strong>of</strong><br />
patients with favorable prognostic prostate cancer factors results in<br />
low toxicity and in excellent functional results. Number <strong>of</strong> implanted<br />
needles depends not only <strong>of</strong> prostate volume, but and individual<br />
anatomy <strong>of</strong> patients. By our results the number <strong>of</strong> 16–18 implanted<br />
needles usually provide optimal dosimetric acceptable volumetric<br />
dose distribution in HDR brachytherapy plan.<br />
PO209<br />
RESCUE TREATMENT IN PROSTATE CANCER FOR LOCAL RELAPSE AFTER<br />
RADIOTHERAPY WITH HIGHDOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
K. Quispe Santibáñez 1 , E. Martínez Pérez 1 , J. Pera Fàbregas 1 , C.<br />
Gutiérrez Miguélez 1 , F. Pino Sorroche 2 , M. Ventura Bujalance 1 , J.F.<br />
Suárez Novo 3 , A.M. Boladeras Inglada 1 , F. Ferrer González 1 , F. Guedea<br />
Edo 1<br />
1<br />
Institut Català d'Oncologia, Radiation Oncology, L'Hospitalet de<br />
Llobregat, Spain<br />
2<br />
Institut Català d'Oncologia, Medical Physics, L'Hospitalet de<br />
Llobregat, Spain<br />
3<br />
H. Bellvitge, Urology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain<br />
: To evaluate our institutional results in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
biochemical progression free survival (BPFS), diseasefree survival<br />
(DFS) and toxicity <strong>of</strong> rescue treatment in prostate cancer for local<br />
relapse (RESCPROST) with HighDose Rate brachytherapy (HDRBT).<br />
: Between November 2004 and June 2011, 36<br />
patients with local failure were included in RESCPROST protocol at our<br />
institution. The mean interval between primary and salvage treatment<br />
was 70 months (range 27131). All patients underwent biopsy to<br />
confirm local relapse. Patients were evaluated to rule out metastatic<br />
or regional disease. The mean PSA before salvage treatment was 5.03<br />
ng/ml (CI 95%, 4.06.0). Upon local relapse, <strong>10</strong> patients had<br />
unfavorable Gleason grade 89 and 2 had advanced stage (T3). A total<br />
<strong>of</strong> 35 patients were treated with HDRBT (1 patient was excluded due<br />
to technical problems). The primary treatment was external beam<br />
radiotherapy in 27 cases and low dose rate brachytherapy (LDRBT) in<br />
7. The prescribed dose was 38 Gy in 4 fractions <strong>of</strong> 9.5Gy, delivered in<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 85<br />
two separate implants performed 2 weeks apart. Adjuvant hormonal<br />
therapy was used in 5 patients (14.3%). Patients were followedup<br />
every six months by physical exam and PSA. If Biochemical<br />
progression, complementary exams to rule out distant disease were<br />
performed.<br />
: The survival and the risk <strong>of</strong> local relapse were calculated<br />
using the KaplanMeier method and toxicity was graded using CTCAE<br />
v3.0. Median followup after RESCPROST was 21 months (range, 673).<br />
After 21 months there are <strong>12</strong> patiens at risk <strong>of</strong> failure. Overall and<br />
specific survival: 2 patients died <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer at 20 and 36<br />
moths. There were 2 cases <strong>of</strong> local relapse at 22 and 32 months. The<br />
risk <strong>of</strong> regional relapses was 22 % at 2 years. Three patients developed<br />
distant bone metastasis at <strong>10</strong>, 14 and 43 months, respectively. Three<br />
patients underwent genitourinary (GU) grade 3 toxicity and 1 patient<br />
presented grade 4 toxicity: all <strong>of</strong> these patients had received<br />
permanentseed brachytherapy previously. No cases <strong>of</strong><br />
gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity grade 3 or 4 were observed. The patients<br />
that relapsed were treated with androgen deprivation therapy. Two<br />
patients received chemotherapy and 2 palliative radiotherapy.<br />
: HDRBT yields a good local control for local prostate<br />
cancer recurrence after radiotherapy. Most <strong>of</strong> the relapses ocurr in<br />
bone or in lymph nodes. The greatest GU toxicity was observed in<br />
patients treated initially with LDRBT.<br />
PO2<strong>10</strong><br />
URINARY ENGRAILED2: A NOVEL BIOMARKER FOR FOLLOW UP POST<br />
RADICAL TREATMENT FOR PROSTATE CANCER<br />
S. Javed 1 , E. Chadwick 2 , A. Michael 3 , R. M<strong>org</strong>an 3 , H. Pandha 3 , R.W.<br />
Laing 2 , S.E.M. Langley 1<br />
1<br />
The Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Urology,<br />
Guildford, United Kingdom<br />
2<br />
The Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oncology,<br />
Guildford, United Kingdom<br />
3<br />
Post graduate medical school University <strong>of</strong> Surrey Guildford. U.K.,<br />
Oncology, Guildford, United Kingdom<br />
: Engrailed2 (EN2) is a homeodomaincontaining<br />
transcription factor that is expressed in embryonic development. It is<br />
subsequently reexpressed and secreted by prostate cancer cells but<br />
not by normal prostate cells. These secretions may be detected in a<br />
patient's urine without the need for prior digital rectal examination<br />
(DRE). The presence <strong>of</strong> EN2 in urine is highly predictive <strong>of</strong> prostate<br />
cancer, with a sensitivity <strong>of</strong> 66% and a specificity <strong>of</strong> 88.2%.<br />
: In this pilot study, we randomly selected <strong>10</strong><br />
patients successfully treated with low dose rate brachytherapy from a<br />
prospectively collated database with over 2000 patients. All patients<br />
were hormone naïve with +5 years follow up and a PSA ≤ 0.1 ng/ml.<br />
The EN2 level was measured in patient's firstpass urine sample,<br />
without prior DRE, using ELISA.<br />
: The results showed that 9/<strong>10</strong> patients had an EN2 level<br />
below the standard cut <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> 42.5 ng/ml (range 032.7, median=4.3).<br />
One patient had a raised EN2 level <strong>of</strong> 406 ng/ml, which was<br />
confirmed on a repeat urine sample. To investigate this further, a<br />
diagnostic flexible cystoscopy was performed on this patient.<br />
Interestingly, he was found to have a small asymptomatic superficial<br />
transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) <strong>of</strong> the bladder. EN2 staining <strong>of</strong> the<br />
tissue taken at the time <strong>of</strong> transurethral resection <strong>of</strong> bladder tumour<br />
(TURBT) confirmed that EN2 was present in the TCC specimen, but not<br />
in the normal bladder biopsies. A urine sample following TURBT<br />
showed an EN2 level <strong>of</strong> 0 ng/ml.<br />
: This preliminary study suggests that EN2 may be a<br />
useful surveillance marker in patients who have undergone radical<br />
treatment for prostate cancer. Further studies with larger sample<br />
sizes are currently in progress to further validate this potential in<br />
patients who have undergone various other forms <strong>of</strong> radical<br />
treatment. Secondly as EN2 is also secreted in TCC <strong>of</strong> the bladder,<br />
studies are under way to validate its diagnostic potential in TCC <strong>of</strong> the<br />
bladder.<br />
PO211<br />
PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY USING AN AUTOMATIC SEED<br />
AFTERLOADER: PRELIMINARY EXPERIENCE IN <strong>10</strong>37 PATIENTS<br />
P. Pommier 1 , M. Delannes 2 , L. Thomas 3 , S. ServagiVernat 4 , G.<br />
Crehange 5 , D. Williaume 6 , C. Llacer 7 , M. Untereiner 8 , A. Bajard 9<br />
1<br />
Centre Léon Bérard, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Lyon,<br />
France<br />
2<br />
Centre Claudius Regaud, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Toulouse, France<br />
3<br />
Institut Bergognié, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Bordeaux,<br />
France<br />
4<br />
CHU Besançon, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Besançon, France<br />
5<br />
Centre GF Leclerc, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Dijon, France<br />
6<br />
Centre E Marquis, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Rennes, France<br />
7<br />
Centre Valdorel, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Montpellier,<br />
France<br />
8<br />
Centre F Baclesse, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Eschsur<br />
Alzette, Luxembourg<br />
9<br />
Centre L Bérard, Department <strong>of</strong> Biostatistics, Lyon, France<br />
: To prospectively assess toxicity outcome in<br />
prostate exclusive brachytherapy with the use <strong>of</strong> an automatic seed<br />
afterloader (seedSelectron, Nucletron R )<br />
: Since November 2002, 1156 patients treated<br />
with the seedselectron for a localized prostate adenocarcinoma have<br />
been included in a prospective multicentric survey database (7<br />
centers in France and 1 in Luxembourg). Data for <strong>10</strong>35 pts with at<br />
least immediate toxicity data are reported. Median age was 66 y. [46 <br />
80]. Mean PSA value was 6.7 ng/l (SD 2.3); 76% were classified as T1C,<br />
19.7% as T2a and 1.1% as T2B (T1a in 1 and T3a in 1 pt); Gleason Score<br />
was < 6 in 84.5%; 7=3+4 in 15.3% (4+3 in 2; 8 in 1 pts).<br />
RESULTS: For the whole population, a urinary obstruction occurred in<br />
31 patients (3%), immediately after the removal <strong>of</strong> the urinary<br />
catheter in <strong>12</strong>; within the first week in 5; within the first 8 weeks in 7<br />
and after 3 mo. in 7 pts. A urinary resection was performed in 6 pts.<br />
The maximal urinary toxicity CTCv3 grade was quoted as 3 in 4.5%; 2<br />
in 39% and 01 in 53%. The maximal IPPS value (available in 931<br />
patients) was > 25 in 3.4%; 20
S86 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
: The mean age was 63.93 years (4488); means pretreatment<br />
PSA was 6.34 ng/mL (0,67 33.09); 88.20% <strong>of</strong> patients ha initial PSA<br />
less <strong>10</strong> ng/mL; 83.28 had Gleason score
S88 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
regular seeds migrated (were lost) out <strong>of</strong> the pelvis compared to 1<br />
AnchorSeed (8/114 vs. 1/<strong>12</strong>6 p=0.015)<br />
: Coated AnchorSeeds were found to have a significant<br />
anchoring effect which was effective in reducing the number <strong>of</strong> apical<br />
seeds that were lost from the pelvis.<br />
PO218<br />
<strong>12</strong>5I BRACHYTHERAPY AS A CURE FOR EARLY STAGE PROSTATE CANCER<br />
IN PATIENTS UNDER 65 YEARS OF AGE<br />
T. Palloni 1 , F.P. Mangiacotti 2 , A. Petrucci 2 , G. Bakacs 3 , M. Martini 3 , R.<br />
Consorti 2 , P. Soldini 1 , D. Cuccoli 4 , M. Sereni 5 , M.A. Mirri 1<br />
1<br />
San Filippo Neri Hospital, Radiotherapy, Roma, Italy<br />
2<br />
San Filippo Neri Hospital, Medical Physics, Roma, Italy<br />
3<br />
San Filippo Neri Hospital, Urology, Roma, Italy<br />
4<br />
San Filippo Neri Hospital, Anesthesia, Roma, Italy<br />
5<br />
San Filippo Neri Hospital, Surgical Unit, Roma, Italy<br />
<br />
: Nowadays, greater public awareness <strong>of</strong> prostate<br />
cancer and the implementation <strong>of</strong> routine PSA screening have resulted<br />
in a decrease in patient age <strong>of</strong> the time <strong>of</strong> first diagnosis 1 . Young age<br />
has traditionally been viewed as a negative prognostic factor 2 . Many<br />
physicians believed that younger patients (pts) are better suited for<br />
surgery rather than radiation as primary treatment 2,3 . However, data<br />
literature supporting this traditional view are very limited 456789 .<br />
Longterm results <strong>10</strong> show that <strong>12</strong>5 I BT represents an effective and safe<br />
treatment with satisfying results in terms <strong>of</strong> biochemical progression<br />
(BP) and <strong>of</strong> overall survival, also in hormone naïve pts ≤60 years (yrs)<br />
with freedom from biochemical failure (FFbF) 92% at 8 yrs 411 . In<br />
addition literature reports that younger pts tolerate BT well, with<br />
favorable quality <strong>of</strong> life and low morbidity even in late follow up<br />
(FUP) <strong>12</strong>13 . It appears evident that the efficacy and morbidity <strong>of</strong> BT,<br />
regardless <strong>of</strong> patient’s age 6 , are strongly correlated to patient<br />
selection, multidisciplinary management and implant quality 1415 . The<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to report our results in pts younger than 65<br />
years treated with <strong>12</strong>5 I BT.<br />
: <strong>12</strong>5 I BT was proposed to pts with PSA ≤ <strong>10</strong>,<br />
Gleason Score (GS) ≤ 7 (3+4), T1T2 stage, good urinary functionality<br />
and prostate volume ≤ 55 gr 16 . The prescription dose was 145 Gy. One<br />
month after the implant, the pts underwent CTbased dosimetry: a<br />
D90 (the dose delivered to 90% <strong>of</strong> the prostate volume) ≥ 140 Gy was<br />
considered the measure <strong>of</strong> good implant quality 17 . We recorded the<br />
following data: post implant dosimetric parameters, acute and late<br />
genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, erectile function<br />
(EF), urinary continence preservation and PSA levels.<br />
: Between February 2009 and December 2011, 41 pts<br />
underwent the <strong>12</strong>5 I BT in our institution, 19 <strong>of</strong> which younger than 65<br />
yrs with a median age <strong>of</strong> 56 yrs. In the cohort <strong>of</strong> younger pts the mean<br />
prostate volume was 35,5 cm 3 and the 1month mean D90 was 149,7<br />
Gy . At a median FUP <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>,5 mts, the toxicity was low with no acute<br />
or late urinary obstruction. The toxicity was 47,4% and <strong>10</strong>,5% grade 1<br />
(G1) and grade 2 (G2) acute GU, respectively, and only 5,3%<br />
developed G1 acute GI toxicity; 31,6% and <strong>10</strong>,5% <strong>of</strong> pts presented G1<br />
and G2 late GU toxicity. At the moment urinary continence and EF are<br />
preserved in the whole group. All pts are free from BP and local<br />
recurrence with mean PSA values reduced <strong>of</strong> 74,2%, 85,2%, 73,0% and<br />
89,6% at 3, 9, 18 and 24 months, respectively.<br />
: Our data confirm <strong>12</strong>5 I BT to be an effective cure also in<br />
younger than 65 yrs pts. <strong>12</strong>5 I BT is particularly suitable for men<br />
motivated to maintain EF, urinary continence and asking to rapidly<br />
return to normal work and social life. Outcome seems strongly related<br />
to a multidisciplinary approach, to high implant quality and technical<br />
ability <strong>of</strong> dedicated team, as well as to the selection <strong>of</strong> the patients.<br />
PO219<br />
IMPLEMENTATION OF INTRAOPERATIVE ULTRASOUND BASED REALTIME<br />
ADAPTIVE PLANNING FOR PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
D. D'Souza 1 , N. Patil 1 , H. Mosalaei 2 , M. Mulligan 2 , K. Jordan 2 , C.<br />
Lewis 2 , T. Murray 3 , L. Derrah 3 , G. Bauman 1<br />
1<br />
The London Regional Cancer Program, Radiation Oncology, London<br />
Ontario, Canada<br />
2<br />
The London Regional Cancer Program, Medical Physics, London<br />
Ontario, Canada<br />
3<br />
The London Regional Cancer Program, Nursing, London Ontario,<br />
Canada<br />
: Improvements in the quality <strong>of</strong> radiation<br />
delivered for several sites has been achieved by the use <strong>of</strong> dynamic<br />
planning. This is particularly relevant to prostate brachytherapy (PB)<br />
with <strong>org</strong>an swelling and movement, difficulty in reproducing the pre<br />
plan positioning <strong>of</strong> needles and seed placement. However such an<br />
approach can be resourceintensive.<br />
: This study prospectively evaluated the effect<br />
<strong>of</strong> implementing intraoperative realtime adaptive planning for PB<br />
with respect to implant quality and procedure time. From Jul/<strong>10</strong> –<br />
Nov/11, 22 patients underwent I<strong>12</strong>5 PB using IBTBebig loose seeds<br />
and Mick applicator. Intraoperative realtime adaptive planning was<br />
performed using Variseed 8.0 and evaluated with ultrasound.<br />
However, we compared the standard dosimetric parameters using Day<br />
30 CT with 23 patients undergoing I<strong>12</strong>5 PB using stranded seeds using<br />
traditional preplanning during the same time period.<br />
:<br />
Median Preplan (n=23) Intraoperative (n=22)<br />
TRUS Volume (cc) 30.5 (range: 20 50) 34.0 (range: 15 57)<br />
Post plan V<strong>10</strong>0 (%) 91.5 (range: 75 99) 95.1 (range: 86 <strong>10</strong>0)<br />
Post plan V200 (%) 16.7 (range: 9 35) 34.5 (range: 13 63)<br />
Post plan D90 (Gy) 141.9 ( range: 116 – 155) 165.4 (range: 132 216)<br />
The median procedure time was 158 minutes (range <strong>10</strong>0225).<br />
However there was a significant reduction in time from the 1 st<br />
quartile (205) to the last quartile (<strong>12</strong>0).<br />
: Intraoperative ultrasound based realtime adaptive<br />
planning for PB is associated with improvement in standard implant<br />
quality parameters compared to preplanning. Acute toxicity is<br />
favourable, however longer followup is required to assess clinically<br />
relevant outcomes.<br />
PO220<br />
DOSE ESCALATION TO 160 GY IN I<strong>12</strong>5 PROSTATE IMPLANTS. EARLY<br />
CLINICAL RESULTS<br />
A. Tormo 1 , E. Collado 1 , S. Roldán 1 , F.J. Celada 1 , J.C. Morales 1 , V.<br />
Carmona 2 , M.C. GarcíaMora 1 , O. Pons 1 , F. Lliso 2 , J. PérezCalatayud 2<br />
1 Hospital La Fe, Radiation Oncology, Valencia, Spain<br />
2 Hospital La Fe, Radiation OncologyPhysics, Valencia, Spain<br />
: The aim <strong>of</strong> this dose escalating study (from<br />
D90>144 Gy to D90>160 Gy) is to analyze the biochemical recurrence<br />
free survival (bRFS) and toxicity pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer patients<br />
treated with I<strong>12</strong>5 seeds implant.<br />
: From January´08 to December´<strong>10</strong> 219 low<br />
risk and one factor intermediaterisk patients were chosen for 160 Gy<br />
I<strong>12</strong>5 therapies. Previous MRI, urinary flowmetry an IPSS questionnaire<br />
were realized. Using realtime intraoperative interactive planning,<br />
prescribed dose was 160 Gy, keeping the same urethral and rectal<br />
constraints as when 144 Gy was the prescribed dose. One month post<br />
implant CT and MRI were realized for postplanning. Median age was<br />
68 years old (range 4179), median PSA 7.7 ng/ml (range 233) and<br />
median Gleason 6. 79 patients were treated with hormone therapy<br />
(media duration 4 months). Median US prostate volume was 35 cc<br />
(range <strong>10</strong>72). Retrospectively maximal acute and chronic toxicity,<br />
using CTCv4.0 and RTOG scales, and bRFS, using Phoenix definition,<br />
were evaluated.<br />
: The incidence <strong>of</strong> grade 34 acute toxicity was 2% (6 patients<br />
required urinary catheter because <strong>of</strong> acute retention, all solved with<br />
medical treatment). No grade 34 chronic toxicity was observed. 74%<br />
<strong>of</strong> patients remained potent. 2% patients presented biochemical<br />
failure with negative complementary exams, including transperineal<br />
prostate saturation biopsy.<br />
: Dose escalation to 160 Gy in I<strong>12</strong>5 prostate implants<br />
don’t give rise more toxicity than 144 Gy. Clinical results are good,<br />
but with a short followup.<br />
PO221<br />
HDR BRACHYTHERAPY BOOST AND EXTERNAL RADIOTHERAPY FOR<br />
UNFAVORABLE PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS<br />
I. Monteiro Grillo 1 , F. Pina 1 , V. Mendonça 1 , A. Amado 1 , J. Melich<br />
Cerveira 2 , G. Marcelino 1 , P. Marques Vidal 3<br />
1 University Hospital <strong>of</strong> Santa Maria, Radiotherapy, Lisboa, Portugal<br />
2 Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 89<br />
3<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Social and Preventive Medicine, University Hospital <strong>of</strong><br />
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland<br />
: To evaluate the outcome <strong>of</strong> prostate cancer<br />
patients treated with a combination <strong>of</strong> HDR <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> boost<br />
(HDRBT) and 3D conformal external pelvic radiotherapy (EBRT) in a<br />
dose escalation study.<br />
: 162 patients were followed between<br />
November 2004 and December 20<strong>10</strong> . Two different dose escalation<br />
groups were done: group 1 (n= 92), 1 fraction HDR boost (9<strong>10</strong> Gy )<br />
followed by EBRT (60 Gy in 6 weeks) – BED: 203216 Gy and group 2<br />
(n=70): 2 fraction HDR boost (1819 Gy), 6 hours interval between<br />
fractions, followed by EBRT (46 Gy in 4.5 weeks) BED: 233.3 247 Gy;<br />
116 pts (71.6%) received concomitant androgen deprivation. Patients<br />
were classified according to the MSKCC criteria into high (N=137) and<br />
intermediate (N=25) risk. Phoenix biochemical failure definition was<br />
used. Toxicity was scored by Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria<br />
(RTOG)<br />
: The mean followup was 41 (range 784) months. The 7 years<br />
cancerspecific and overall survival was <strong>10</strong>0% an 92%, respectively.<br />
The 7 years actuarial biochemical control rate was 89% and <strong>10</strong>0% for<br />
group 1 and 2, respectively. One patient from group 1 and two<br />
patients from group 2 never reached a low nadir. Two patients<br />
developed distant metastases <strong>12</strong> and 16 months after the treatment.<br />
In a multivariate Coxregression analysis neither treatment nor risk<br />
group (intermediate vs. high risk) were associated with increased risk<br />
for biochemical failure. The RTOG grade 3 genitourinary early toxicity<br />
was 1.0% and 8.5% while gastrointestinal/genitourinary late toxicity<br />
was 7.6% and 1.4% for group 1 and 2, respectively<br />
: HDR BT boost followed by EBRT appears to be a safe,<br />
feasible and effective treatment for patients with unfavorable<br />
localized prostate cancer. This study shows a beneficial effect on<br />
biochemical control in group 2 pts, however without statistical<br />
significance. Higher radiation doses (BED 233.3247 Gy) do not seem<br />
to carry extra toxicity.<br />
PO222<br />
A NEW DIMENSION TO THE TREATMENT OF LOCALIZED PROSTATE<br />
CANCER: 4D BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
S. Langley 1 , E. Chadwick 2 , S. Javed 1 , R.W. Laing 2<br />
1<br />
Royal Surrey County Hospital, Urology, Guildford, United Kingdom<br />
2<br />
Royal Surrey County Hospital, St Lukes Cancer Centre, Guildford,<br />
United Kingdom<br />
: LDR prostate brachytherapy has been performed<br />
at our centre for the last <strong>12</strong> years. Data for patients have been<br />
collected on a bespoke, prospective database. During this time, we<br />
have made significant modifications to the technique, culminating in a<br />
new onestage realtime procedure, which utilizes the benefits <strong>of</strong><br />
stranded and loose seeds. After an initial learning curve, data for<br />
cohorts <strong>of</strong> patients from sequential techniques are compared here.<br />
: In 1999, implants were performed using the<br />
Seattle technique, with loose seeds in a modified uniform<br />
distribution. From 2005, seeds were implanted as a combination <strong>of</strong><br />
stranded seeds placed peripherally, and loose seeds placed centrally,<br />
with a Mick applicator. This was termed the 'Guildford Hybrid<br />
technique'. By 2007, implants were still preplanned, but realtime<br />
planning allowed intraoperative plan modifications, 'Realtime<br />
optimization'. In 2008, a nomogram for seed and strand ordering was<br />
developed so that implants could be performed as a 1stage<br />
procedure. All planning now takes place intraoperatively. The plans<br />
are developed iteratively, in response to realtime dosimetric<br />
feedback. This technique is termed '4D <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>'.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
:<br />
The table describes demographics and dosimetry. The D90, %D90 (D90<br />
as a percentage <strong>of</strong> the prescribed dose) and V<strong>10</strong>0 were all<br />
significantly higher for the three modifications to the procedure<br />
compared with the original Seattle series (p
S90 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
: Between July 1999 up to December 2011 446<br />
patients with low and intermediate risk prostate cancer were treated<br />
with permanent seed implantation. <strong>12</strong>8 patients received Palladium<br />
<strong>10</strong>3, 329 received Iodine<strong>12</strong>5. The median follow up for the entire<br />
group is 48 months (mean 53.36 months, min 1/ max 144 months).<br />
Pretreatment low risk criteria were as follows: PSA level < <strong>10</strong> ng/ml,<br />
Gleason score < 7, intermediate risk: PSA level ><strong>10</strong> < 20 ng/ml or<br />
Gleason 7. In exceptional cases we also treated patients with high risk<br />
features (PSA level > 20 ng/ml or Gleason > 8).<br />
In order to exclude patients with extraprostatic disease, between<br />
2002 and 2004 we routinely performed a MRT +/ endorectal coil.<br />
Since 2004 we only recommended pretreatment erMRT for patients<br />
with higher risk for stage T3 tumours (patients in the intermediate<br />
risk group, with positive biopsies in both prostate lobes or high risk<br />
patients). To evaluate side effects, validated questionnaires, as IPSS,<br />
EORTC QLQC30(+3), IIEF 5/15 and individual parameters like<br />
maximum urinary flow rates and residual urine volume were assessed<br />
before implantation and every three month within the first two years.<br />
Irritative and obstructive interferences were monitored and analysed.<br />
For quality assurance four weeks after the procedure a postplan was<br />
calculated in all cases.<br />
: Every procedure was performed without major<br />
complications. Mild to moderate acute genitourinary side effects<br />
included obstructive and/or irritative symptoms. Rectal side effects<br />
like mild to moderate proctitis also occurred, but gradually resolved<br />
in most patients. Biochemical relapse free survival (bNED) according<br />
to nadir +2 ng/ml for the entire cohort is 93.73%. Low / intermediate<br />
/ high risk patients represented a bNED <strong>of</strong> 92.3, 97.7 and 97%<br />
respectively (figure 1).<br />
: Prostate brachytherapy with Palladium<strong>10</strong>3 and Iodine<br />
<strong>12</strong>5 permanent implantation is a feasible, minimal invasive, highly<br />
effective procedure for curative treatment for low and intermediate<br />
risk prostate cancer.<br />
PO224<br />
LONG TERM EXPERIENCE OF HDR BOOST FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE<br />
USING INVERSE PLANNING WITH SIMULATED ANNEALING<br />
E. Vigneault 1 , P. Despré 1 , A.G. Martin 1 , W. Foster 1 , S. Aubin 1 , L.<br />
Beaulieu 1<br />
1<br />
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec L'HôtelDieu de Québec,<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Quebec, Canada<br />
: The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is to report PSA failure<br />
free survival (Phoenix) in localized prostate cancer patients treated<br />
with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by HDR (high<br />
dose rate) boost using inverse planning with simulated annealing<br />
(IPSA).<br />
: Since 1999, 731 prostate cancer patients<br />
were treated with 4044 Gy <strong>of</strong> EBRT followed by HDR boost using<br />
inverse planning with simulated annealing (IPSA). The HDR boost<br />
evolved from 3 fractions (6 Gy X 3) technique to two fractions ( 95<strong>10</strong><br />
Gy X 2) technique and more recently in a one fraction technique (15<br />
Gy X 1). Patients were followed prospectively. Only patients with a<br />
minimum followup <strong>of</strong> 6 months were analyzed and presented in this<br />
study. We define the PSA failure free survival using Phoenix<br />
definition. Chisquare test was used to compare PSA failure free<br />
survival between the three risk groups and different dose / fraction<br />
regimens.<br />
: Out <strong>of</strong> the 731 patients, 640 had a minimum followup <strong>of</strong> 6<br />
months. Pretreatment PSA was< <strong>10</strong> ng/ml in 75% <strong>of</strong> patients, <strong>10</strong>20<br />
ng/ml in 22% and > 20 ng/ml in 3% respectively. The mean age <strong>of</strong><br />
patients at presentation was 65.9 year with an average clinical follow<br />
up <strong>of</strong> 36 months (range 6130 months). 82% <strong>of</strong> patients presented with<br />
a clinical stage T1T2a, 16% T2bc and 2 % > T3. 18% had a Gleason<br />
Score ≤ 6 /<strong>10</strong> and 75% Gleason score 7 and 7% Gleason score ≥ 8. 59%<br />
were low risk, 39% intermediate risk and 7% high risk prostate cancer<br />
patients. In our population 80% did not received androgen deprivation<br />
therapy (ADT) while 20% received short / long term (high risk patient)<br />
ADT. For the whole group <strong>of</strong> patients the 5 year PSA failure free<br />
survival (Phoenix) is 98.7%. The 5 year PSA failure free survival was<br />
not statistically different between the three risk group (low,<br />
intermediate and high) and between the different HDR<br />
dose/fractionation used.<br />
: The use <strong>of</strong> HDR brachytherapy boost in localized<br />
prostate cancer gives impressive 5 year PSA failure free survival using<br />
Phoenix definition even in intermediate and high risk group. These<br />
results are comparable with other single institution series. These<br />
excellent results should be compared to high dose EBRT in a<br />
multicentre Phase III study.<br />
PO225<br />
PLANNED TURP PRIOR TO LDR PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY DOES NOT<br />
CAUSE INCONTINENCE<br />
E. Chadwick 1 , S. Javed 2 , R.W. Laing 1 , S.E.M. Langley 2<br />
1<br />
Royal Surrey County Hospital, St Lukes Cancer Centre, Guildford,<br />
United Kingdom<br />
2<br />
Royal Surrey County Hospital, Urology, Guildford, United Kingdom<br />
: Historically, patients with a high IPSS (>15), or a<br />
recent transurethral resection <strong>of</strong> the prostate (TURP), have been<br />
excluded from brachytherapy due to concerns regarding urinary<br />
incontinence, urinary outflow obstruction and the ability to achieve<br />
acceptable dosimetry. However, since 2006, a limited TURP/bladder<br />
neck resection (BNR) has been <strong>of</strong>fered to patients with significant<br />
obstructive symptoms (poor urinary flow or poor bladder emptying)<br />
before their implant. The dosimetry, subsequent urinary function and<br />
biochemical relapse free survival (bRFS) are described here.<br />
: 65 Preimplant brachytherapy patients with<br />
at least 32 months follow up, with obstructive ur<strong>of</strong>lowmetry or large<br />
postvoid residuals, together with a high bladder neck due to median<br />
lobe hypertrophy on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) were <strong>of</strong>fered a BNR<br />
/ limited TURP 6 weeks before their implant, as these patients are<br />
known to experience significant postimplant urinary toxicity. 9<br />
patients received neoadjuvant hormones and 4 patients received<br />
EBRT in combination with their implant. IPSS scores were recorded<br />
prospectively on a bespoke database. A questionnaire based on the<br />
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire was<br />
sent to patients retrospectively to assess incontinence, described<br />
below:<br />
Over the past 4 weeks, how <strong>of</strong>ten have you leaked urine?<br />
Which <strong>of</strong> the following best describes your urinary control during<br />
the last 4 weeks?<br />
How many pads or adult nappies per day did you usually use to<br />
control leakage during the last 4 weeks?<br />
: The mean follow up was 47 months. The 4 year bRFS was<br />
97%. The mean postimplant D90 as a percentage <strong>of</strong> the prescribed<br />
dose was 1<strong>12</strong>%. The mean V<strong>10</strong>0 and V150 were 94 and 56Gy respectively.<br />
The mean urethral V150 was 6%.<br />
Urinary morbidity is described in the table below. 1 patient developed<br />
a urethral stricture at 18 months. No patient went into urinary<br />
retention or required intermittent selfcatheterisation. The mean<br />
score for the EPIC incontinence domains was 93% and in particular no<br />
one was using pads.<br />
Months FU<br />
PreBNR /<br />
Urinary morbidity<br />
<strong>12</strong> 24 36<br />
TURP<br />
Mild IPSS 08 55% 53% 66% 77%<br />
Moderate IPSS 916 35% 41% 25% 20%<br />
Severe IPSS 1735 9% 7% 9% 3%<br />
: A limited TURP / BNR is a procedure which can be<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 91<br />
performed on patients with urinary outflow obstruction who might not<br />
otherwise have been <strong>of</strong>fered brachytherapy, and is preferable to a<br />
postimplant TURP when tissue healing is less predictable and patients<br />
will have inevitably endured significant urinary symptoms prior to<br />
surgery. A preimplant TURP does not cause urinary incontinence and<br />
is associated with low urinary morbidity. The dosimetry and bRFS in<br />
this series demonstrate that the oncological management is not<br />
compromised.<br />
PO226<br />
INCORPORATING EDEMA IN PROSTATE SEED IMPLANT DOSIMETRY USING<br />
A CLINICALLYINFORMED EDEMA MODEL<br />
D. Liu 1 , T. Monajemi 2 , R. Sloboda 1<br />
1<br />
Cross Cancer Institute, Medical Physics Department, Edmonton,<br />
Canada<br />
2<br />
McGill University Health Center, Medical Physics Unit, Montreal,<br />
Canada<br />
: To calculate preplan and postimplant dosimetric<br />
quantifiers for prostate seed implants using a new spatially<br />
anisotropic linearly timeresolving edema model.<br />
: <strong>10</strong> patients treated with I<strong>12</strong>5 permanent<br />
prostate brachytherapy were studied retrospectively. On preplan US<br />
and postimplant CT scans, dose distributions incorporating edema<br />
were calculated (Med Phys 2011, 38:22892298) and compared with<br />
TG43 point source calculations. The edema model parameters<br />
(magnitude = 0.2 and resolution time = 28 days) were chosen based on<br />
previously published results (<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>10</strong>, 9:354361).<br />
Dosimetric quantifiers were calculated for the preplan PTV and the<br />
postimplant prostate using CERR, an opensourced radiotherapy<br />
s<strong>of</strong>tware. For one preplan case, representative edema effects were<br />
also determined for Pd<strong>10</strong>3 and Cs131 implants using the same seed<br />
distribution with adjusted source strength.<br />
: The dose when incorporating edema was consistently lower<br />
than the TG43 dose. The relative error expressed as a percent (RE%)<br />
was calculated between the two dose distributions. The maximum RE%<br />
within the structure boundary was 2.7. The mean RE% was 2.02<br />
[range: 1.95 – 2.<strong>12</strong>] for the preplan PTV and 2.<strong>10</strong> [range: 2.04 – 2.17]<br />
for the postimplant prostate. There was no significant difference in<br />
mean RE% between the prostate and its subregions (i.e. urethra, near<br />
bladder, prostate surface). The ~2% reduction in dose when<br />
accounting for edema was similarly reflected in several dose metrics,<br />
as shown in the table. Postimplant results exhibited similar<br />
differences. All differences in dose metrics were found to be<br />
correlated with prostate volume (R 2 > 0.6; p < 0.01).<br />
Preplan dose metric Incorporating edema TG43<br />
Mean dose 282 Gy 286 Gy<br />
D90 188 Gy 192 Gy<br />
V200 27.8 % 29.7 %<br />
V150 69.3 % 72.4 %<br />
V<strong>10</strong>0 (145 Gy) 99.6 % 99.7 %<br />
The dosimetric differences were greater for Pd<strong>10</strong>3 and Cs131<br />
compared to I<strong>12</strong>5, as shown in the DVH figure. The mean RE% were<br />
2.0, 6.0, and 7.5 for I<strong>12</strong>5, Pd<strong>10</strong>3, and Cs131, respectively.<br />
: The dosimetric effects <strong>of</strong> edema for <strong>10</strong> I<strong>12</strong>5 implants<br />
were determined using an anisotropic edema model with clinically<br />
based parameters. The mean dose was ~2% lower when accounting for<br />
edema and this difference was observed with little variation across<br />
different regions <strong>of</strong> the prostate, between pre and postplans, and<br />
between patients. Similar reductions were observed for the mean<br />
dose, D90, V200, and V150. The effects <strong>of</strong> edema were substantially<br />
greater for Pd<strong>10</strong>3 and Cs131 compared to I<strong>12</strong>5.<br />
PO227<br />
C4 MARKERS FOR MRIBASED PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
S. Frank 1 , T. Madden 2 , D.A. Swanson 3 , K. Martirosyan 4 , R.<br />
Uthamanthil 5 , J. Stafford 6 , M. Gagea 5 , T.J. Pugh 1 , R. Kudchadker 7 ,<br />
M.J. Johansen 2<br />
1<br />
U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, Houston TX,<br />
USA<br />
2<br />
U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Experimental Therapeutics,<br />
Houston TX, USA<br />
3<br />
U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Urology, Houston TX, USA<br />
4<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Texas Brownsville, Chemical and Biomolecular Imaging,<br />
Houston TX, USA<br />
5<br />
MD Anderson Cancer Center, Veterinary Medicine and Surgery,<br />
Houston TX, USA<br />
6<br />
MD Anderson Cancer Center, Imaging Physics, Houston TX, USA<br />
7<br />
MD Anderson Cancer Center, Radiation Physics, Houston TX, USA<br />
: To establish the invivo safety and efficacy <strong>of</strong> a<br />
permanently implantable cobalt chloride complex contrast agent (C4)<br />
to localize radioactive seeds for MRIbased prostate brachytherapy.<br />
: To support evaluation <strong>of</strong> the extent <strong>of</strong><br />
complexation and stability <strong>of</strong> the complexed material, a LC/MS<br />
method using diethyl dithiocarbamate (DDTC) derivitization quantified<br />
free cobalt in C4 solutions and in plasma spiked with C4. The extent<br />
<strong>of</strong> complexation and stability <strong>of</strong> C4 complexes in water and plasma<br />
were then evaluated over 5 days at 37°C. Ninemicroliter doses<br />
(equivalent to leakage from <strong>12</strong>0 C4 MRI markers in a man) <strong>of</strong> vehicle<br />
control, 1% and <strong>10</strong>% C4 solution, were injected into the prostates <strong>of</strong><br />
male SpragueDawley rats via laparotomy. Cobalt disposition in<br />
plasma, tissues, feces and urine was evaluated along with both gross<br />
and microscopic evidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>org</strong>an toxicity. C4 MRI markers with I<strong>12</strong>5<br />
stranded seeds were inserted into both prostate phantoms and an in<br />
vivo canine prostate for seed localization under 1.5 and 3T MRI (TR<br />
1500/TE 30).<br />
: At physiologic pH in plasma, the C4 solutions were found to<br />
contain a consistently low amount <strong>of</strong> free cobalt over the 5day period<br />
thereby demonstrating nearly complete complexation formation with<br />
available cobalt in the solutions. The mean free cobalt measured on<br />
Day 0, 2, 4 and 5 ranged from 6.08.8%. The pharmacokinetics<br />
analyses revealed no treatmentrelated morbidity or mortality among<br />
60 rats. Cobalt was detected in the plasma only transiently (at 560<br />
minutes, mean peak concentration 1.40 g/mL); in the urine (60<br />
minutes6 hours, mean peak concentration 11.6 g/mL at 6 hours);<br />
and in the feces (3.28 g/g at 624 hours), but only in the highdose<br />
(<strong>10</strong>% C4) group. Findings confirmed the expected dual renalhepatic<br />
elimination <strong>of</strong> this compound. Toxicity data demonstrating the rapid<br />
elimination <strong>of</strong> cobalt in animals administered the C4 solution. No<br />
adverse clinical signs and no histopathologic lesions were noted in any<br />
dose group. The C4 MRI markers could be visualized under both 1.5T<br />
and 3T MRI and localize the implanted seeds invivo.<br />
: In summary, these data demonstrate the formulation<br />
used for the C4 MRI Marker contains complexes as identified. <strong>10</strong>% C4 is<br />
the noadverseeffectslevel in this setting and is therefore expected<br />
to be safe as an MRI marker for prostate cancer treatment. The C4<br />
MRI marker was able to localize implanted seeds under 1.5 and 3T T1<br />
weighted MRI in phantoms and within invivo canine prostates.<br />
PO228<br />
PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF PHARMACOLOGIC PENILE REHABIL<br />
ITATION FOLLOWING PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
T.J. Pugh 1 , D.A. Swanson 2 , R.J. Kudchadker 3 , T.L. Bruno 3 , M.F.<br />
Munsell 4 , S.J. Frank 1<br />
1<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology,<br />
Houston TX, USA<br />
2<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Urology, Houston<br />
TX, USA<br />
3<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Radiation Physics,
S92 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
Houston TX, USA<br />
4 University <strong>of</strong> Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Biostatistics,<br />
Houston TX, USA<br />
: To describe patient reported sexual quality <strong>of</strong> life<br />
in men treated with prostate brachytherapy and prophylactic<br />
tadalafil.<br />
: Between 20052011, we prospectively<br />
measured outcomes reported by 237 patients before and after<br />
prostate brachytherapy monotherapy. All patients were prescribed<br />
tadalafil <strong>10</strong> mg tablets by mouth twice weekly starting 2 weeks prior<br />
to brachytherapy implant. No patient had previously used a 5<br />
phosphodiesterase inhibitor for erectile enhancement. The expanded<br />
prostate index composite (EPIC) was completed prior to any<br />
intervention (baseline) and at each followup assessment. The change<br />
in EPIC sexual domain, sexual function, and sexual bother scores was<br />
calculated. Preservation <strong>of</strong> potency was assessed through subgroup<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> men declaring 'erections firm enough for intercourse' at<br />
baseline versus posttreatment evaluation.<br />
: The mean sexual domain, sexual function, and sexual bother<br />
scores at baseline were 57.4, 50.9, and 72.8 respectively. Sexual<br />
domain and sexual function scores decreased significantly from<br />
baseline at each time interval assessed (Range 148 months). The<br />
mean change in sexual domain and sexual function score from<br />
baseline to 24 months was 5.5 (p = 0.013) and 6.1 (p = 0.007)<br />
respectively. Sexual bother scores were not significantly different at<br />
24 months. The mean change in sexual bother score was 4.4 (p =<br />
0.219). Sixtythree percent <strong>of</strong> men reported full potency at baseline.<br />
At 24 month followup, 75% <strong>of</strong> men with baseline potency reported<br />
potency preservation.<br />
: This is the first ever report <strong>of</strong> prophylactic 5<br />
phosphodiesterase inhibitor use for preservation <strong>of</strong> erectile function<br />
in men treated with prostate brachytherapy. These results compare<br />
favorably to published outcomes with brachytherapy alone or<br />
alternative management strategies for localized prostate cancer. A<br />
randomized trial <strong>of</strong> prophylactic tadalafil is warranted.<br />
PO229<br />
ACUTE AND CHRONIC TOXICITY ASSOCIATED WITH THREE HIGHDOSE<br />
RATE BRACHYTHERAPY MONOTHERAPY SCHEDULES<br />
J. Dilworth 1 , H. Ye 1 , M. Ghilezan 1 , M. Wallace 1 , C. Shah 1 , D. Krauss 1 ,<br />
G. Gustafson 1 , A. Martinez 1<br />
1 William Beaumont Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Royal Oak, USA<br />
: To report the acute and chronic toxicity pr<strong>of</strong>iles<br />
associated with three highdoserate brachytherapy (HDR) regimens<br />
used as monotherapy for favorablerisk prostate cancer.<br />
: 482 patients with T stage T2b or less, Gleason<br />
score 7 or less, and pretreatment PSA value 18 ng/mL or less were<br />
treated with HDR. 317 patients received 38 Gy in four fractions; 72<br />
received 24 Gy in two fractions; 93 received 27 Gy in two fractions.<br />
Chisquare, ttest, ROC, and univariate analyses were conducted to<br />
compare patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. Acute and<br />
chronic toxicities were defined as those occurring within or after the<br />
first six months following treatment, respectively, and graded using<br />
the CTCAE, v3.0.<br />
: Median followup was 3 years for all patients. Clinical<br />
outcomes were similar among groups, with 3yr actuarial rates <strong>of</strong> 91%<br />
(biochemical failurefree survival, p=0.76), 99% (overall survival,<br />
p=0.83), and <strong>10</strong>0% (causespecific survival). Acute and chronic<br />
toxicities are listed in Table 1. All acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities<br />
were similar among groups. The majority <strong>of</strong> acute genitourinary (GU)<br />
symptoms was similar among groups, with urinary retention and<br />
urinary incontinence rates being higher in the 38 Gy group. All chronic<br />
GU toxicities were similar among groups. The majority <strong>of</strong> chronic GI<br />
toxicities was similar among groups, with chronic diarrhea being lower<br />
in the 38 Gy group. Nine patients (2%) developed urethral strictures<br />
requiring surgical dilation. Patients receiving prebrachytherapy<br />
hormonal therapy (HT) experienced higher acute GI and GU toxicities<br />
(20% and 70%) then hormonenaïve patients (<strong>10</strong>% and 53%)(p=0.03 and<br />
0.02). In a separate analysis <strong>of</strong> patients who did not receive HT, the<br />
relative rates <strong>of</strong> acute and chronic GU and GI toxicities were<br />
comparable. Gland volume did not predict acute or chronic toxicity.<br />
Table 1. Acute and chronic toxicities (all patients)(A.T.=acute<br />
toxicity, C.T.=chronic toxicity)<br />
All (n=415) Toxicity 38/4<br />
(n=256)<br />
24/2<br />
(n=68)<br />
27/2 (n=91) p<br />
value<br />
G1 G2 G3 G1 G2 G3 G1 G2 G3 G1 G2 G3<br />
A.T. 33% <strong>12</strong>% 1% Freq./Urg. 34% 11% 2% 31% 13% 0% 30% 13% 0% 0.56<br />
20% 3% 0% Dysuria 23% 3% 0% 14% 4% 0% 14% 1% 0% 0.11<br />
<strong>12</strong>% 6%
S94 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
PO232<br />
ARE URETHRAL TOXICITIES CORRELATED WITH DOSE AFTER<br />
INTERSTITIAL HDR BOOST BRACHYTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER?<br />
R. Broksch 1 , F.A. Siebert 1 , N. Brüske 1 , B. Kimmig 1 , R. Galalae 2<br />
1 University Hospital SH Campus Kiel, Radiotherapy, Kiel, Germany<br />
2 University Hospital SH Campus Kiel, Medical Faculty, Kiel, Germany<br />
: HDR brachytherapy as boost technique for<br />
prostate cancer patients is in our clinic a well established technique.<br />
Study aim was a volumetric evaluation stratified by anatomyrelated<br />
urethral segmentation in correlation with urethral toxicities.<br />
: HDRBT prescription prostate dose was 2x15<br />
Gy to peripheral zone (CTV1) and 8.5 Gy to the whole prostate gland<br />
(CTV2), using 8 ± 1 (SD) implant needles. Dosimetric analyses were<br />
performed in 70 consecutive patients i.e. 140 HDRBTfractions,<br />
treated in 2003. Intraoperative technique based on TRUS images was<br />
applied. The echo <strong>of</strong> an inserted catheter plus 2 mm margin was<br />
digitized as urethra structure, and was digitally divided into three<br />
anatomical distinct parts. Two very basal TRUSimages + one cranial<br />
additional were defined as 'basal urethra', and two very apical slices +<br />
one distal additional as 'apical urethra'. The remaining mid part was<br />
labeled 'pars prostatica'. For each partial volume D5 and D0.1cc were<br />
calculated using the TG43 formalism and the mean dose indices over<br />
the two fractions were used for evaluation. Late urethral toxicities<br />
were analyzed for each patient according to RTOG/EORTC<br />
classification and compared against the computed urethral doses <strong>of</strong><br />
the three segments.<br />
: For basal urethra, the D5 was <strong>10</strong>.1 ±3.8 Gy (SD), and for<br />
D0.1cc 8.6 ±2.9 Gy. Similar values were measured in the apex: D5<br />
<strong>10</strong>.2 ±2.8 Gy and D0.1cc 8.4 ±2.3 Gy, while pars prostatica showed<br />
higher D5 with <strong>12</strong>.4 ±3.7 Gy and D0.1cc 11.6 ±3.7 Gy.<br />
Late toxicities <strong>of</strong> grade 3 cystitis were found in 6%. One patient with<br />
grade 4 toxicity developed a bladder fistula. First results show no<br />
correlations between dose indices in the distinct urethra segments<br />
and toxicities.<br />
: Dosimetric differences in three sequential anatomy<br />
related urethral segments were detected. Nevertheless, no<br />
correlation between dose and late toxicities in the urethra could be<br />
found is this study.<br />
PO233<br />
INTENSITY MODULATED HIGHDOSERATE BRACHYTHERAPY AS<br />
MONOTHERAPY FOR CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER<br />
N. Tselis 1 , D. Baltas 2 , U.W. Tunn 3 , T. Buhleier 1 , T. Martin 4 , N.<br />
Milickovic 2 , S. Papaioannou 2 , H. Ackermann 5 , N. Zamboglou 1<br />
1<br />
Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Offenbach am Main, Germany<br />
2<br />
Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics and<br />
Engineering, Offenbach am Main, Germany<br />
3<br />
Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Department <strong>of</strong> Urology, Offenbach am<br />
Main, Germany<br />
4<br />
Klinikum Bremen Mitte, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Bremen,<br />
Germany<br />
5<br />
J.W. Goethe University <strong>of</strong> Frankfurt, Institute <strong>of</strong> Biostatistics,<br />
Frankfurt am Main, Germany<br />
: To report the clinical outcome <strong>of</strong> intensity<br />
modulated (IM) high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BRT) as sole<br />
treatment (monotherapy) for localized prostate cancer.<br />
: Between January 2002 and December 2009,<br />
718 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer were treated<br />
with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided IMHDR monotherapy. Three<br />
biologically equivalent treatment protocols were applied; 141 patients<br />
received 38 Gy using one implant at 4 fractions <strong>of</strong> 9.5 Gy with<br />
computed tomography based treatment planning [Group A], 351<br />
patients received 38 Gy in 4 fractions <strong>of</strong> 9.5 Gy using two implants (2<br />
weeks apart) and intraoperative TRUS realtime treatment planning<br />
[Group B], and 226 patients received 34.5 Gy using three single<br />
fraction implants <strong>of</strong> 11.5 Gy (3 weeks apart) and intraoperative TRUS<br />
realtime treatment planning [Group C]. Biochemical failure was<br />
defined according to the `Phoenix consensus´ and toxicity evaluated<br />
using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.<br />
: The median followup was 52.8 months. For the entire<br />
cohort, the 36, 60 and 96 months biochemical control (BC),<br />
metastasisfree survival, and overall survival rates were 97 %, 94 %, 89<br />
% and 99 %, 98 %, 97 % as well as 98 %, 96 % and 95 %, respectively.<br />
For Group A (n=141) and Group B (n=351) the 36, 60 and 96 (80)<br />
months BC rates were 97 %, 94 %, 89 % (96 months) and 99 %, 98 %,<br />
and 97 % (80 months), respectively. For Group C (n=226), the <strong>12</strong>, 24<br />
and 35 months BC rates were <strong>10</strong>0 %, 98 % and 95 %, respectively.<br />
Toxicity was scored per event with 5.4 % acute Grade 3 genitourinary<br />
and 0.2 % acute Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity. Late Grade 3<br />
genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity were 3.5 % and 1.6 %,<br />
respectively. Two patients developed Grade 4 genitourinary toxicity.<br />
No other instance <strong>of</strong> Grad 4 or greater acute or late toxicity was<br />
reported.<br />
: Our results confirm IMHDRBRT to be a safe and<br />
effective monotherapeutic treatment modality for clinically <strong>org</strong>an<br />
confined prostate cancer.<br />
<br />
PO234<br />
DOSE OPTIMIZATION OF INTRAVAGINAL BRACHYTHERAPY USING<br />
DIFFERENT MULTICHANNEL APPLICATORS<br />
H. Kuo 1 , K. Mehta 1 , R. Yaparpalvi 1 , L. Hong 1 , A. Wu 1 , D. Mynampati 1 ,<br />
W. Bodner 1 , M. Garg 1 , S. Kalnicki 1<br />
1 Montefiore Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Bronx NY, USA<br />
: An inflatable applicator (Capri TM , Varian, USA)<br />
with thirteen lumens is designed with the advantage <strong>of</strong> reducing air<br />
pocket, and conforming dose to patient tissues. It is arranged in two<br />
concentric rings (with six lumens each) surrounding a central lumen.<br />
This study investigates the dose distribution in intravagina between<br />
applicators <strong>of</strong> Capri, multichannel cylinder, Contura balloon, and<br />
Mammosite balloon (Figure 1).<br />
: Plans for Capri (injected water <strong>of</strong> 30 cc, 40<br />
cc, and 60 cc which corresponding to 3.5 cm, 3.7 cm, and 4.2 cm<br />
respectively) were configured with central lumen activated only (C),<br />
middle ring lumens activated only (M), outer ring lumens activated<br />
only (O), all lumens activated (CMO), outer ring lumens activated<br />
combined with selective dwell positions in middle ring lumens<br />
activated (mO). The goals were dose prescribed to 5mm depth (PTV)<br />
from surface <strong>of</strong> each applicator (D90>90%) with minimum dose at<br />
normal tissue (OAR) which is another 5mm away. To study the<br />
difference <strong>of</strong> dose to the apex <strong>of</strong> the vagina and dose to the body <strong>of</strong><br />
vagina, plans were evaluated at the proximal 2 cm length vagina<br />
[PTV_A(V150) & OAR_A(V80)] and the rest <strong>of</strong> treatment length at<br />
vagina body [PTV_B(V150) & OAR_B(V80)].<br />
: Compares similar size (3.5cm diameter at midbody) <strong>of</strong><br />
different applicators, Contura and Mammosite have lowest<br />
OAR_B(V80) but have maximal PTV_B(V150) (<strong>12</strong>%) as well. Capri<br />
planned with 'O' loading or 'mO' loading has slightly better OAR_B(V80)<br />
and reasonable PTV_B(V150) (~5%) compared to multichannel<br />
cylinder. At apical vagina, Contura & Mammosite have similar<br />
PTV_A(V150) and have better OAR_A(V80) comparing to Capri. Muliti<br />
channel cylinder has the highest value in both <strong>of</strong> PTV_A(V150) and<br />
OAR_A(V80). The sizes <strong>of</strong> the Contura and Mammosite limit their<br />
treatment length to the vaginal body. Compares different<br />
configurations <strong>of</strong> activated lumens in Capri with different sizes, plans<br />
in 'C' or 'M' loading show better at PTV( V150) but worse at OAR(V80);<br />
on the contrary, plans in 'O' loading show better at OAR( V80) but<br />
worse at PTV(V150). Plans in 'CMO' loading have PTV(V150) close to<br />
plans in 'C' & 'M' loading but the OAR(V80) are not optimum. To<br />
minimize PTV(V150) and OAR(V80) simultaneously, plan in 'mO' loading<br />
is the best choice for each size. It <strong>of</strong>fers the least amount <strong>of</strong> OAR(V80)<br />
which is close to plan in 'O' loading yet with moderate value <strong>of</strong><br />
PTV(150).<br />
: Postoperative endometrial brachytherapy using Capri<br />
applicator which has the potential <strong>of</strong> eliminating airsurface interface<br />
results in excellent intravagina dose coverage. A modifiedperipheral<br />
loading <strong>of</strong> the total 13 lumens provides tolerable dose to mucosa <strong>of</strong><br />
vagina, good coverage to vaginal treatment depth, and the best dose<br />
sparing at normal tissue.<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 95<br />
PO235<br />
CLINICAL OUTCOME AND DOSIMETRIC PARAMETERS OF MRIGUIDED<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY IN CERVICAL CANCER PATIENTS<br />
C.N. Nomden 1 , A.A.C. de Leeuw 1 , J.M. Roesink 1 , J.H.A. Tersteeg 1 ,<br />
M.A. Moerland 1 , I.M. JürgenliemkSchulz 1<br />
1 U.M.C. Utrecht, Radiotherapy, Utrecht, The Netherlands<br />
: To report and evaluate the dosimetric<br />
parameters and clinical outcome <strong>of</strong> our first patients treated with a<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) ± chemotherapy<br />
and MRI guided brachytherapy (BT).<br />
: Fortysix cervical cancer patients treated<br />
between January 2006 and October 2008 were analysed. EBRT dose<br />
was 45Gy in 25 fractions and concomitant monotherapy cisplatin was<br />
given weekly (40 mg/m 2 ). PDR (n=39), HDR (n=5), or combined<br />
HDR/PDR (n=2) MRIguided BT was delivered using either an<br />
intracavitary (IC) or combined intracavitary/interstitial (IC/IS)<br />
approach. The aim <strong>of</strong> BT treatment was to increase the D90 HRCTV<br />
while taking into account the dose volume constraints for bladder,<br />
rectum, sigmoid, and bowel (D2cc < 90, 75, 75, and 75Gy EQD2,<br />
respectively). Outcome was evaluated in terms <strong>of</strong> tumour control and<br />
survival. Additionally, late morbidity was scored using CTCAE v3.0.<br />
: Thirtytwo patients (70 %) were treated with the IC approach<br />
and 14 (30 %) with IC/IS using the Utrecht interstitial CT/MR<br />
applicator. Median HRCTV volume was 45.1 cm 3 (<strong>12</strong>–182) at time <strong>of</strong><br />
the first BT application. Mean total D90 HRCTV was 84±9 Gy EQD2,<br />
with a D2cc for bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and bowel <strong>of</strong> 83±7, 66±6,<br />
61±6, and 64±9 Gy EQD2, respectively. Figure1 shows that higher D90<br />
HRCTV values were easier achieved in smaller tumour volumes. No<br />
significant relation was found between delivered dose and local<br />
recurrences (only 3 cases). Median followup was 41 months for all<br />
patients. Local control, progression free survival, and overall survival<br />
at 3 years were 93, 72, and 65%, respectively. Failures occurred in 13<br />
patients (28%): 3 local and 6 regional failures (persistent disease and<br />
recurrences), 5 paraaortic failures, and <strong>10</strong> distant metastases. Table1<br />
shows the progression free survival (PFS) and the failures in relation<br />
to the FIGO stages.<br />
Eighteen late morbidities (grade 35) were observed in 6 <strong>of</strong> 46<br />
patients. Gastrointestinal toxicity: 2 rectal bleedings (G3), 2 proctitis<br />
(G3), 1 diarrhoea (G3), 1 rectal incontinence (G4), 1 radiation<br />
enteritis (G4), and 1 rectovaginal fistula (G4). Sexual/ reproductive<br />
toxicity: 1 vaginal stenosis (G3) and 1 vagina mucositis (G4).<br />
Renal/genitourinary: 1 ureter stenosis (G3).Musculoskeletal fibrosis<br />
(G3) was seen in one patient, abdominal epidermolysis (G3) in one,<br />
and one patient had anaemia (G3). Finally, one patient with vaginal<br />
top necrosis (G4) and underlying coagulation disorder due to alcohol<br />
related liver failure died because <strong>of</strong> vaginal bleeding (G5).<br />
: The addition <strong>of</strong> MRI guidance to the treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
advanced cervical cancer results in high local control rates. Future<br />
work should focus on the prevention <strong>of</strong> regional and distant failures<br />
and the reduction <strong>of</strong> late toxicity.<br />
PO236<br />
3D IMAGE BASED VS. POINT BASED DOSIMETRY FOR CERVICAL CANCER:<br />
EARLY OUTCOME ANALYSIS<br />
N. Kannan 1 , H. Kim 2 , C. Houser 2 , S. Beriwal 2<br />
1 University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh, School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA<br />
: Currently, most <strong>of</strong> the published outcomes data<br />
for cervical cancer brachytherapy utilizes pointbased dosimetry,<br />
where the goal is to deliver <strong>10</strong>0% ± 5 % <strong>of</strong> the prescription dose to the<br />
designated 'point A'. The last ABS survey, conducted in 2007, revealed<br />
that 55% <strong>of</strong> the respondents used CTbased planning. Of these<br />
respondents, 76% still prescribed to Point A instead <strong>of</strong> using a 3D<br />
derived tumor volume. Radiation oncologists may be reluctant to<br />
accept 3D imageguided brachytherapy (IGBT) plans for patients in<br />
whom the point A dose is significantly lower than prescription dose<br />
because <strong>of</strong> concerns for inferior outcomes. But using a fixed<br />
prescription point can result in greater than necessary doses to the<br />
adjacent bowel and bladder and a correspondingly greater risk <strong>of</strong><br />
serious treatment complications. The goal <strong>of</strong> our study was to look at<br />
the response rates and outcomes <strong>of</strong> patients who were treated with<br />
IGBT with CT or MRI based planning and had a point A dose that was<br />
less than 90% <strong>of</strong> prescription dose.<br />
: We have treated <strong>10</strong>3 patients from January<br />
2007 to June 2011 with IGBT with the dose optimized to the HRCTV.<br />
Of these patients, 30 with FIGO stage IB1 to IIIB had a point A dose<br />
less than 90% <strong>of</strong> the prescription dose and were included in the study.<br />
Eleven patients had pelvic and/or periaortic nodes visualized on<br />
PET/CT. The median pretreatment tumor size was 4 (0.9 to 9.0) cm<br />
and 11 patients had a tumor size ≥ 5 cm. The median age was 56<br />
(range 2286). 22 patients had an MRIbased plan and 8 patients had a<br />
CTbased plan for HDR brachytherapy. The brachytherapy dose was<br />
5.5 Gy x 5 fractions (25 pts) and 5 Gy x 5 (5 pts). At planning, the goal<br />
was to achieve D90 (dose to 90% <strong>of</strong> HRCTV) <strong>of</strong> ≥<strong>10</strong>0% <strong>of</strong> prescription<br />
dose. The point A dose was recorded but not used for prescription or<br />
treatment. The median point A dose was 85 (50 to 89)% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
prescription dose. The median HRCTV treated was 28.9 (15.338.5)<br />
cc. The median EQD2 D90 HRCTV and median EQD2 Point A were<br />
82.3 ( 75.989.8) Gy and 73.9 (58.074.9) Gy ( p
S96 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
: All thirty patients completed the planned course <strong>of</strong> radiation<br />
treatment. All but two were available for assessment <strong>of</strong> response. All<br />
28 patients had complete clinical response. Twentythree patients had<br />
a followup PET/CT at 3 months posttreatment, and all showed<br />
complete metabolic response in the cervix. One patient had residual<br />
uptake in the leftexternal iliac node, but this was decreased when<br />
compared to a pretreatment PET/CT. At the median followup time<br />
<strong>of</strong> 7.2 months (334 months) ,one patient has developed recurrence<br />
with bone metastases at 29 months. One patient developed a RTOG<br />
grade 3 complication <strong>of</strong> enterovaginal fistula at <strong>10</strong> months post<br />
therapy requiring surgical intervention. This patient’s point A % dose<br />
was 85%, D90 HDR CTV 84 Gy (<strong>10</strong>8%), and D2cc bladder, rectum, and<br />
sigmoid colon doses were 79.5 Gy, 59.2 Gy, and 70.9 Gy respectively.<br />
: Our early results suggest that the 3D dosimetry<br />
translated into excellent response rate and early outcome in these<br />
patients. The decrease in point A dose did not cause any detrimental<br />
effects and should be reassuring to the treating clinician. We need<br />
both interim and longterm outcome data with this approach for wider<br />
adoption <strong>of</strong> this technique.<br />
PO237<br />
DOSIMETRIC EFFECTS OF RECTAL FILLING ON VAGINAL CYLINDER<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
S. Sabater 1 , I. Andres 1 , V. de la Vara 2 , M.J. Muñoz 2 , E. Jimenez 1 , M.V.<br />
Carrizo 1 , A. Martos 1 , R. Berenguer 1 , A. Nuñez 1 , M. Arenas 3<br />
1 Hospital General de Albacete, Radiation Oncology, Albacete, Spain<br />
2 Hospital General de Albacete, Radiation Physics, Albacete, Spain<br />
3 Hospital Sant Joan de Reus, Radiation Oncology, Reus, Spain<br />
: Bladder filling variations have shown dosimetric<br />
consequences on <strong>org</strong>ans <strong>of</strong> risk on patients referred for vaginal<br />
brachytherapy. Fewer reports have been focused on the effect <strong>of</strong><br />
rectal filling when treating such patients despite this subject has<br />
received great attention on external irradiation. The aim <strong>of</strong> this study<br />
was to evaluate the variation <strong>of</strong> rectal dose related to the rectal<br />
distension, on patients treated postoperatively with vaginal cylinder<br />
brachytherapy related to rectal distention.<br />
: Retrospective brachytherapy evaluation was<br />
done for seventeen patients with endometrial cancer treated with<br />
fractionated postoperative HDR vaginal cuff cylinders (MicroSelectron)<br />
alone or after an external radiotherapy course. Identical cylinder on<br />
each insertion was used. A CTscan was done on each fraction.<br />
Bladder was catheterized and filled with 50cc (5 cc <strong>of</strong> iodine contrast<br />
dissolved in 45 cc <strong>of</strong> saline water during CT. No special instructions<br />
were given to patients except for attempting to evacuate prior to<br />
come to the hospital. Barium rectal contrast (50cc) was administered<br />
in some fractions at discretion <strong>of</strong> the treating physician. 3D dose<br />
planning was performed with PLATO v14.2.6. External surfaces <strong>of</strong> the<br />
rectum and bladder were countered; bladder was contoured on all CT<br />
scans. The rectum was contoured from 1 cm above the tip <strong>of</strong> cylinders<br />
to the caudal well position level. Documented rectal doses were D0.1cc,<br />
D1cc, D2cc, D5cc and D<strong>10</strong>cc. Doses were recorded as percentages from the<br />
prescribed dose to 0.5 cm from the cylinder surface. Cross sectional<br />
area (CSA) was also calculated<br />
: Seventyfour CTseries were reviewed, 3 to 6 series per<br />
patient (mean 4.7, median 4). Barium rectal contrast was<br />
administered on the 16% <strong>of</strong> fractions. Percentages <strong>of</strong> fractions with<br />
barium per patient fluctuate between 0% and 50%. Rectal volumes and<br />
dosimetric results are tabulated in table 1. Independent non<br />
parametrical test showed significance in all rectal level doses<br />
analysed.<br />
Mean Mean no barium Mean barium p<br />
Rectum volume (cc) 47.32 45.34 57.73 .155<br />
CSA 9.17 8.83 <strong>10</strong>.87 .083<br />
D Rectum 0.1 cc (%) 118.26 115.1 134.81 .000<br />
D Rectum 1 cc (%) 96.83 93.93 1<strong>12</strong>.07 .000<br />
D Rectum 2 cc (%) 87.56 84.61 <strong>10</strong>3.02 .000<br />
D Rectum 5 cc (%) 71.45 68.54 86.70 .000<br />
D Rectum <strong>10</strong> cc (%) 56.03 53.37 69.93 .000<br />
: Our preliminary results shown a dismal effect related to<br />
the barium contrast enema. A significant increment <strong>of</strong> rectal doses<br />
was evident over the full length <strong>of</strong> the rectal DVH related to such<br />
intervention. Despite we could see as the rectal volume and CSA<br />
increased as well, the first didn’t reached a statistically significance<br />
and the second remained borderline. Our data attract attention to<br />
avoid maneuvers that distend rectum and, if the data are confirmed,<br />
could warrant to empty the rectum before any vaginal cuff<br />
brachytherapy fraction.<br />
PO238<br />
DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON OF OPTIMISATION METHODS FOR<br />
MULTICHANNEL INTRACAVITARY VAGINAL BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
C. Lapuz 1 , C. Dempsey 2 , P. O'Brien 2<br />
1<br />
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Division <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Melbourne, Australia<br />
2<br />
Calvary Mater Newcastle, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Newcastle, Australia<br />
: To compare dose distributions generated by<br />
inverse planning simulated annealing (IPSA), dose point optimisation<br />
(DPO) and graphical optimisation (GrO) for vaginal cancers treated<br />
with high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy using a multichannel<br />
intracavitary vaginal cylinder.<br />
: CT data sets were obtained for five<br />
consecutive patients with recurrent vaginal cancers treated with<br />
multichannel intracavitary HDR brachytherapy. Treatment plans were<br />
generated using DPO, GrO, surface optimisation with IPSA (surf IPSA),<br />
and volume optimisation with IPSA (vol IPSA). The plans were<br />
evaluated for target coverage, conformal index (COIN), dose<br />
homogeneity index (DHI) and dose to <strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OARs).<br />
: Vol IPSA and surf IPSA achieved the best target coverage with<br />
mean V<strong>10</strong>0 values <strong>of</strong> 95.46% (range: 90.56–98.81%) and 93.04% (range:<br />
87.94–97.70%) respectively. Mean D90 was similar for GrO, surf IPSA<br />
and vol IPSA plans. Rectal D2cc was within tolerance for all<br />
optimisation methods. Vol IPSA plans resulted in slightly higher<br />
bladder D2cc for some patients and higher vaginal mucosa D0.5cc for<br />
all patients. Surf IPSA and DPO provided the greatest homogeneity<br />
within the target volume with mean DHIs <strong>of</strong> 0.81 (range: 0.79–0.83)<br />
and 0.81 (range: 0.78–0.83) respectively. Surf IPSA and GrO had the<br />
highest conformity with mean COINs <strong>of</strong> 0.74 (range: 0.64–0.85) and<br />
0.71 (range: 0.67–0.80) respectively. Vol IPSA plans had inferior<br />
homogeneity and conformity with mean DHI <strong>of</strong> 0.55 (range: 0.48–0.68)<br />
and mean COIN <strong>of</strong> 0.54 (range: 0.39–0.74).<br />
: Surf IPSA was user friendly for the generation <strong>of</strong><br />
treatment plans and achieved good target coverage, conformity and<br />
homogeneity with acceptable doses to OARs. Vol IPSA plans provided<br />
good target coverage but resulted in higher doses to the vaginal<br />
mucosa and lower COIN and DHI. DPO plans provided inadequate<br />
coverage <strong>of</strong> the target volume. GrO resulted in acceptable plans but<br />
at the expense <strong>of</strong> increased planning times.<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 97<br />
PO239<br />
THE ROLE OF VAGINAL BRACHYTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF STAGE<br />
I PAPILLARY SEROUS OR CLEAR CELL ENDOMETRIAL CANCER<br />
B. Barney 1 , I. Petersen 1 , M. Haddock 1<br />
1<br />
<strong>May</strong>o Clinic, Academic Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Rochester, USA<br />
: International Federation <strong>of</strong> Gynecology and<br />
Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage I papillary serous (PS) and clear cell (CC)<br />
endometrial histologies were excluded or underrepresented on<br />
practicedefining endometrial cancer trials, resulting in confusion<br />
regarding the optimal adjuvant therapy for patients with these<br />
tumors. Because they are at a high risk for both local and extrapelvic<br />
relapse, adjuvant chemotherapy is commonly administered to these<br />
women; however, recommendations for adjuvant radiotherapy vary<br />
widely. We report on the largest singleinstitution experience using<br />
adjuvant highdose rate (HDR) vaginal brachytherapy (VBT)<br />
for patients with FIGO Stage I PS or CC endometrial cancer.<br />
:From 1998 to 2011, <strong>10</strong>3 women with FIGO<br />
2009 Stage I PS (n=74, 72%), CC (n=21, 20%), or mixed PS/CC (n=8, 8%)<br />
endometrial cancer underwent surgical staging followed by adjuvant<br />
HDR VBT. Surgery consisted <strong>of</strong>, at a minimum, total abdominal<br />
hysterectomy and bilateral salpingooophorectomy (TAH/BSO), and<br />
nearly all patients (n=98, 95%) also underwent extended lymph node<br />
dissection, with a median number <strong>of</strong> nodes dissected <strong>of</strong> 45 (range, 0<br />
to <strong>10</strong>0). Other common surgical procedures included peritoneal fluid<br />
washings (n=92, 89%), omentectomy (n=83, 81%), and random<br />
peritoneal biopsies (n=63, 61%). All VBT was performed with a multi<br />
channel vaginal cylinder, treating to a dose <strong>of</strong> 21 Gy in 3 fractions.<br />
The treatment volume consisted <strong>of</strong> the entire vaginal mucosa<br />
extending from the vaginal cuff to within 1 to 2 cm <strong>of</strong> the urethral<br />
meatus. Thirtyfive patients (34%) also received adjuvant platinum<br />
based chemotherapy, either prior to (n=7, 20%) or after (n=28, 80%)<br />
HDR VBT.<br />
: At a median followup <strong>of</strong> 36 months (range, 1 to 146 months),<br />
2 patients had experienced a vaginal recurrence (VR), and the 5year<br />
Kaplan Meier (KM) estimate <strong>of</strong> VR was 3%. Rates <strong>of</strong> isolated pelvic<br />
(PR), locoregional (LRR, VR + PR), and extrapelvic (EPR, including<br />
intraabdominal) recurrence were similarly low, with 5year KM<br />
estimates <strong>of</strong> 4, 7, and <strong>10</strong>%, respectively. Estimates for 5year disease<br />
free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 88 and 84%,<br />
respectively (see Figure). On univariate analysis, having nonPS<br />
histology was associated with an increased risk <strong>of</strong> VR (p=0.02).<br />
: Vaginal brachytherapy is effective at preventing vaginal<br />
relapse in women with Stage I PS or CC endometrial cancer. In this<br />
cohort <strong>of</strong> surgically staged patients, the risk <strong>of</strong> isolated pelvic or<br />
extrapelvic relapse was low, implying more extensive adjuvant<br />
radiotherapy is likely unnecessary.<br />
PO240<br />
DAILY HDR BRACHYTHERAPY IN THE POSTOPERATIVE SETTING OF<br />
ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA<br />
A. Rovirosa 1 , I. Valduvieco 1 , A. Herreros 1 , C. Bautista 1 , I. Romera 1 , I.<br />
Rios 1 , M. Arenas 2 , A. Biete 1<br />
1 Hospital Clinic i Universitari, Radiation Oncology, Barcelona, Spain<br />
2 Hospital Sant Joan de Reus, Radiation Oncology, Tarragona, Spain<br />
: To analyze the preliminary results <strong>of</strong> HDR<br />
brachytherapy (HDRBT) administered daily on local control and<br />
toxicity in postoperative endometrial carcinoma (EC).<br />
: From January 2007 to September 20<strong>10</strong>, 1<strong>12</strong><br />
patients with FIGO Stage 24IA, 48IB, 14II, <strong>12</strong>IIIA, IIIIIB, 8IIIC1 and<br />
4IIIC2, were treated with HDRBT after surgery. Pathology: 99/1<strong>12</strong><br />
endometrioid and 23/1<strong>12</strong> other types. Radiotherapy. Group 1: 70/1<strong>12</strong><br />
External beam irradiation (EBI) + HDRBT (2 fractions 56Gy); Group 2:<br />
42/1<strong>12</strong> HDRBT alone (4 fractions 56Gy). Toxicity evaluation: RTOG<br />
scores for bladder and rectum; Objective criteria <strong>of</strong> LENTSOMA for<br />
vagina. Statistics: Chisquare and Fisher exact test.<br />
: With a mean followup <strong>of</strong> 29.5 months (range 9.653.6) no<br />
patients developed vaginalcuff relapse. Toxicity. Group 1: early G1<br />
G2 appeared in 9% in rectum, 8.5% bladder, 1.4% in vagina (stenosis);<br />
late problems appeared in 8.5% in rectum (all G<strong>12</strong> but 1 G3) and 25%<br />
in vagina (all G<strong>12</strong> but 1G4). Group 2: Early G<strong>12</strong> toxicity 9.4% in<br />
bladder, 6.9% in vagina; late problems appeared in 2.3% in rectum<br />
(G1) and 6.9% in vagina (G<strong>12</strong>).<br />
: Daily HDRBT using 2 fractions <strong>of</strong> 5Gy after EBI and 4<br />
fractions <strong>of</strong> 5Gy as exclusive treatment was a safe regime in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
local control and toxicity; Group 1 had a higher incidence <strong>of</strong> late<br />
vaginal toxicity. This regime allows all the treatment to be performed<br />
in a lower overall interval time and is less resource consuming than<br />
other regimes with a greater number <strong>of</strong> fractions.<br />
PO241<br />
THREEDIMENSIONAL IMAGE GUIDED PULSED DOSE RATE<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY BOOSTING BULKY CERVICAL CANCER<br />
T. Refaat 1 , W. Small Jr 1 , N. Lotfy 2 , A. Elsaid 2 , E. Lartigau 3 , P. Nickers 3<br />
1<br />
Northwestern University, Radiation Oncology, Chicago, USA<br />
2<br />
Alexandria University, Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Egypt<br />
3<br />
Centre Oscar Lambret and University Lille II, Academic Radiation<br />
Oncology Department, Lille, France<br />
: Concomitant radiotherapy and platinumbased<br />
chemotherapy is the standard <strong>of</strong> care for patients with locally<br />
advanced cervical cancer. Pulsed Dose Rate (PDR) <strong>Brachytherapy</strong><br />
rather than High Dose Rate (HDR) <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> may decrease normal<br />
tissue toxicity due to radiobiological advantages while maintaining the<br />
ability to optimize dose distribution. This study aimed to determine<br />
the feasibility, tolerance and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Image Guided PDR<br />
brachytherapy after External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) and weekly<br />
cisplatin for cervix cancer.<br />
: Forty female patients with histologically<br />
confirmed Stage IB2 or II cervical cancer and treated with<br />
concomitant EBRT and cisplatin followed by a PDR brachytherapy<br />
boost were identified. All patients were initially evaluated with EUA,<br />
CT, MRI, and laparoscopic lymphadenectomy or PET scan. Patients<br />
received 45 50 Gy EBRT to the pelvis with concomitant weekly<br />
cisplatin 40mg/m 2 for 56 cycles. All patients then underwent<br />
reimaging with CT or MRI prior to brachytherapy. The brachytherapy<br />
boost was accomplished with one insertion using an MRI compatible<br />
tandem and ovoid applicator. A PLATO treatment planning system<br />
using MRI imaging and target definition based on GEC ESTRO<br />
guidelines was used. 0.5 Gy per fraction was delivered every hour for<br />
a duration <strong>of</strong> 6070 hours to a total dose <strong>of</strong> 3035 Gy to the HR CTV<br />
and <strong>10</strong>15 Gy to the IR CTV. Dose to <strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OAR), rectum,<br />
bladder, and sigmoid was limited to
S98 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
The disease free survival was 92.5%. Acute toxicity was as follows:<br />
<strong>10</strong>% grade 3 anemia, 2.5% grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia,<br />
<strong>12</strong>.5% grade 3 diarrhea, 5% grade 2 and 2.5% grade 3 proctitis.<br />
: There are few reports <strong>of</strong> PDR brachytherapy boost using<br />
imageguidance in stage IB2 and II cervix cancer. In this study, a PDR<br />
brachytherapy boost using MRI image guidance after external beam<br />
radiotherapy and cisplatin was welltolerated. Although follow up was<br />
relatively short, local control and toxicity appear comparable, and<br />
possibly superior, to that in studies using imageguided HDR<br />
brachytherapy. The advantages <strong>of</strong> PDR brachytherapy include a<br />
reduction in medical resources by requiring only a single admission to<br />
the operating room and reduction in physics time by requiring only<br />
one treatment planning, reduction <strong>of</strong> total treatment time possibly<br />
improving local control, reducing treatment induced toxicities and<br />
minimal risk <strong>of</strong> radiation exposure to patient and medical personnel<br />
PO242<br />
<strong>12</strong>5I SEED PERMANENT IMPLANTATION FOR PELVIC RECURRENT<br />
GYNECOLOGICAL MALIGNANCIES AFTER MULTIPLE THERAPY<br />
W. Jiang 1 , J. Li 1 , L. Zhu 1 , P. Jiang 1 , H. Wang 1 , J. Wang 1 , C. Liu 2 , H.<br />
Yuan 2 , W. Ran 3<br />
1<br />
Peking University Third Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Beijing, China<br />
2<br />
Peking University Third Hospital, radiology department, Beijing,<br />
China<br />
3<br />
Peking University Third Hospital, Ultrasound, Beijing, China<br />
: To assess the feasibility, efficacy, and morbidity<br />
<strong>of</strong> imageguided radioactive iodine <strong>12</strong>5 ( <strong>12</strong>5 I) seed implantation for<br />
pelvic recurrent gynecological malignancies after multiple therapies.<br />
: From July 2005 to July 20<strong>10</strong>, 11 patients with<br />
<strong>12</strong>5<br />
pelvic recurrent gynecologic malignancies received I seed<br />
implantation guided by computerized tomography (CT) or ultrasound.<br />
The primary cancers were cervical cancer (n = 8), endometrial cancer<br />
(n = 2), and leiomyosarcoma <strong>of</strong> the uterus (n = 1). Ten patients had<br />
undergone surgery, EBRT and chemotherapy before seed implantation,<br />
one had undergone only surgery and EBRT, and the median total dose<br />
was 68 Gy (range, 50<strong>10</strong>2 Gy). Seven patients were suffering from<br />
pain. Six masses were treated by CTguided, one by intraoperative<br />
ultrasound, two by ultrasound, two by transvaginal ultrasound, and<br />
two by transrectal ultrasound. A median <strong>of</strong> 29 seeds per patient<br />
(range, <strong>10</strong><strong>10</strong>9) were implanted, with a median activity <strong>of</strong> 0.7 mCi<br />
(range, 0.40.8 mCi). The actuarial median D90 is 13290cGy (5455.3<br />
171<strong>10</strong>cGy)<br />
: After a median followup <strong>of</strong> 13.6 months (range, 336<br />
months), 85.7% (6/7) patients received relief from pain. Median local<br />
control was six months (95% CI, 4.47.6 months). The 1 , 2, and 3<br />
year local control rates were 18.2%, 18.2%, and 18.2%, respectively.<br />
Median overall survival was 13.6 months (95% CI, 8.618.6 months).<br />
The 1, 2, and 3year actuarial overall survival rates were 63.6%,<br />
11.4%, and 11.4%, respectively. One patient (9.1%) developed grade 1<br />
acute toxicity <strong>of</strong> the urinary system.<br />
: Interstitial <strong>12</strong>5 I seed implantation guided by CT or<br />
ultrasound is a safe and effective palliative therapy for patients with<br />
pelvic recurrent gynecological malignancies after surgery and external<br />
beam radiotherapy.<br />
PO243<br />
LATE TOXICITY AND TOLERANCE OF THE VAGINAL VAULT TO<br />
INTRACAVITARY HIGH DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
O. KaidarPerson 1 , R. AbdahBortnyak 1 , A. Amit 2 , A. Nevelsky 1 , A.<br />
Berniger 1 , R. Bar – Deroma 1 , S. Billan 1 , R. Ben Yosef 1 , A. Kuten 1<br />
1<br />
Rambam Health Care Campus Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine Technion,<br />
Oncology Insitute, Haifa, Israel<br />
2<br />
Rambam Health Care Campus Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medicine Technion,<br />
Gyneconcology unit, Haifa, Israel<br />
: The tolerability <strong>of</strong> the vaginal vault to<br />
radiotherapy is high; however, this was estimated only in studies using<br />
intracavitary LDR brachytherapy. There are many differences between<br />
HDR treatment plans making it challenging to evaluate its true<br />
biologicalclinical effects; therefore, there is a need for a spectrum <strong>of</strong><br />
maximal surface doses that are safe without causing vaginalvault<br />
necrosis combined with acceptable long term complication rates.<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to evaluate the late effects and tolerance <strong>of</strong><br />
the vaginal vault after concomitant chemotherapy with pelvic<br />
irradiation and intracavitary HDR brachytherapy.<br />
: A retrospective review <strong>of</strong> the medical records<br />
<strong>of</strong> all consecutive patients who were treated between 1998 and 2002<br />
was undertaken. Analyzed parameters included radiation dose and<br />
treatment–associated late sequelae <strong>of</strong> the vaginal vault, rectum and<br />
bladder. Vaginal, rectal and bladder toxicity was graded according to<br />
the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version<br />
4.0. The HDR vaginal mucosal dose was calculated for 4 central<br />
reference points on the surface <strong>of</strong> the ovoids. The maximal vaginal<br />
surface dose was defined as the sum <strong>of</strong> the physical doses <strong>of</strong> the<br />
maximal HDR dose (out <strong>of</strong> the 4 reference points) and the external<br />
irradiation dose.<br />
: Fifty patients were included in the study; the average age at<br />
diagnosis was 54 (range 30 – 87) years. There were no records <strong>of</strong> acute<br />
grade IV toxicity during treatment. Seven patients were lost to follow<br />
up. The maximal HDR vaginal surface dose was <strong>10</strong>3 Gy. The maximal<br />
combined external and HDR vaginal surface dose was 148 Gy. There<br />
were no cases <strong>of</strong> vaginal necrosis or fistulas. There were no cases <strong>of</strong><br />
grade IV late vaginal, rectal or bladder toxicity. No correlation was<br />
found between the maximal vaginal surface dose and vaginal, rectal<br />
or bladder toxicity.<br />
: Concomitant chemoradiotherapy including pelvic<br />
radiotherapy and HDR intracavitary brachytherapy is safe in the<br />
definitive treatment <strong>of</strong> advanced uterine cervix carcinoma. The<br />
tolerance dose <strong>of</strong> the vaginal vault using HDR brachytherapy and<br />
pelvic irradiation exceeds 148 Gy.<br />
PO244<br />
A DOSIMETRY PHANTOM FOR GYNEOCOLOGICAL BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
M. Nazarnejad 1 , D.R. Mahdavi 2<br />
1 Medical Radiation Engineering Science and Research Branch Islamic<br />
Azad University Tehran Iran, Medical Radiation Engineering, Tehran,<br />
Iran Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong><br />
2 Tehran University <strong>of</strong> Medical Sciences Science and Research Branch<br />
Islamic Azad University Tehran Iran, Medical physics, Tehran, Iran<br />
Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong><br />
: Dosimetric accuracy is a major issue in the<br />
quality assurance program <strong>of</strong> treatment planning systems (TPS). An<br />
important contribution to this process has been a proper dosimetry<br />
method to guarantee the accuracy <strong>of</strong> delivered dose to the tumor. In<br />
brachytherapy (BX) <strong>of</strong> gyneocological (Gyn) cancer it is usual to insert<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> tandem & ovoids applicators with a complicated<br />
geometry which makes their dosimetry verification difficult and<br />
important. Therefore, evaluation and verification <strong>of</strong> dose distribution<br />
is necessary for accurate dose delivery to the patients.<br />
: The solid phantom was made from Perspex<br />
slabs as a tool for intracavitary brachytherapy dosimetric quality<br />
assurance. Film dosimetry (EDR2) was done for a combination <strong>of</strong><br />
ovoids and tandem applicators introduced by Flexitron brachytherapy<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 99<br />
system. Treatment planning was also done with Flexiplan 3DTPS to<br />
irradiate films sandwiched between phantom slabs. Isodose curves<br />
obtained from treatment planning system and film were compared<br />
with each other in 2D and 3D manners.<br />
: The brachytherapy solid phantom was constructed with slabs.<br />
It was possible to insert tandem and ovoids and after loaded with<br />
radioactive source <strong>of</strong> Ir192. Relative error was between 38.6% and<br />
average relative error was 5.08% in comparison between film and TPS<br />
isodose curves.<br />
: Our results showed that the difference between TPS and<br />
measurement is well in tolerance limits and below the action level<br />
according to AAPM TG.45. Our findings showed that this phantom<br />
after minor corrections can be used as a method <strong>of</strong> choice for inter<br />
comparison analysis <strong>of</strong> TPS and to fill the existed gap for accurate<br />
quality assurance program in intracavitary brachytherapy. Constructed<br />
phantom also showed can be a valuable tool for verification <strong>of</strong><br />
accurate dose delivery to the patients as well as training for<br />
brachytherapy residents and physics students.<br />
PO245<br />
EFFECT OF BLADDER DISTENSION ON DOSIMETRY OF ORGAN AT RISK IN<br />
CT BASED PLANNING OF HDR ICBT FOR CERVICAL CANCER<br />
K. Sazzad Manir 1 , P. Niladri B 1 , B. Swapnendu 2 , G. Jyotirup 3 , K. Apurba<br />
K 1 , S. Shyamal K 1 , B. Kallol 1 , G. Kaushik 2<br />
1<br />
Medical College Kolkata, Dept <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Kolkata, India<br />
2<br />
R.G.Kar Medical College Kolkata, Dept <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Kolkata,<br />
India<br />
3<br />
Wset Bank Hospital, Dept <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Howrah, India<br />
: Distension and shape <strong>of</strong> urinary bladder may vary<br />
during ICBT for cervical cancer, significantly affecting doses to<br />
bladder, rectum and sigmoid colon and consequently late radiation<br />
toxicities.<br />
To evaluate the effects <strong>of</strong> fixed bladder distension with different<br />
volumes on dosimetry, assessed by three dimensional image based<br />
planning techniques, in bladder, rectum and sigmoid colon in cancer<br />
cervix patients during ICBT.<br />
: Forty seven patients <strong>of</strong> cervical cancer (stage<br />
IB to IVA) were taken for ICBT following EBRT (50Gy in 25 fractions,<br />
5days a week).<br />
Patients were grouped in 4 different groups:<br />
Group A :Empty bladder group (defined as no extra saline or contrast<br />
material given after Foleys catheter insertion, gentle evacuation <strong>of</strong><br />
bladder done by Foleys catheter)<br />
Group B(upto 40ccinstillation)<br />
Group C(41cc80cc instillation)<br />
Group D(81cc and above instillation).<br />
Planning CT scans were performed after insertion <strong>of</strong> applicators and<br />
three dimensional treatment planning was done on Brachyvision<br />
treatment planning system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA).<br />
Dose volume histograms were analysed. Bladder, rectum, sigmoid<br />
colon doses were collected for individual plans and compared, based<br />
on the amount <strong>of</strong> bladder filling .<br />
Dose volume data from the different groups were compared using<br />
Multivariate Regression Model (ANOVA, Post Hoc test). A pvalue <strong>of</strong><br />
less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Adjustment for<br />
potential confounders [including parity, tumor stages, and type <strong>of</strong><br />
applicator used] was performed in multiple linear regression models.<br />
: Mean dose to the bladder significantly decreased with<br />
increased bladder filling.<br />
On Post Hoc test analysis and multivariate analysis during multiple<br />
comparisons among each groups it was found that mean dose <strong>of</strong><br />
bladder was significantly decreased in Group D in comparison with<br />
group A (p value 0.001)and also with group B (p value 0.038)..(Mean<br />
value <strong>of</strong> mean dose <strong>of</strong> bladder were 3.2Gy in Group A, 2.9Gy in Group<br />
B, 2.8 Gy in Group C and 2.2 Gy in Group D.). This finding was also<br />
validated by Kruskal Wallis test (Monte Carlo significance was 0.02)<br />
and Mann Whitney U test.<br />
However, doses to the small volumes (0.1cc, 1cc,2cc) which are<br />
relevant for brachytherapy, did not change significantly with bladder<br />
filling for bladder, rectum or sigmoid colon.<br />
On analysing covariable factors such as parity, stage, applicator type<br />
(multivariate analysis) it has been found that maximum dose <strong>of</strong><br />
bladder along with two DVH parameters (0.1ml,1ml volume dose) are<br />
increased in higher parity groups and the change is statistically<br />
significant (average p value was 0.0025) and weak positive correlation<br />
exists.<br />
: There is no significant change in the bladder, rectum<br />
and sigmoid colon dosimetric parameters with bladder distention.<br />
Though mean bladder dose decreaseswith distension <strong>of</strong> bladder there<br />
is no change <strong>of</strong> small volume dose parameters (o.1cc, 1cc,2cc) which<br />
are actually important for late toxicities in ICBT patients. A larger<br />
study with clinical correlation <strong>of</strong> late toxicities is needed to is needed<br />
to evaluate this strategy.<br />
PO246<br />
OVERALL SURVIVAL RATES IN LOCALLY ADVANCED CERVIX CANCER A<br />
BRAZILIAN EXPERIENCE<br />
C. Campos 1 , J.V. Salvajoli 2 , P.E. Novaes 3 , M.G.C. da Silva 4 , J.A.A.<br />
Oliveira 5 , F.J.M. Neto 5<br />
1<br />
Hospital Haroldo Juacaba, Radiatio, Fortaleza, Brazil<br />
2<br />
Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo ICESP, Radiation<br />
Oncology, Sao Paulo, Brazil<br />
3<br />
Instituto Santista de Oncologia ISO, Radiation Oncology, Sao Paulo,<br />
Brazil<br />
4<br />
Hospital Haroldo Juacaba, Epidemiology, Fortaleza, Brazil<br />
5<br />
Universidade do Estado do Ceara UECE, Medicine, Fortaleza, Brazil<br />
: Evaluate the overall survival rates in locally<br />
advanced cervix cancer patients and determine the clinical and<br />
treatment prognostic factors for local control and overall survival<br />
rates.<br />
: A retrospective cohort study was carried out<br />
with 261 patients stage IIIB, 164 patients received 54 Gy RT to the<br />
pelvis and 30 Gy <strong>of</strong> HDR without chemotherapy and 97 patients<br />
received 54 Gy RT to the pelvis and 30 Gy <strong>of</strong> HDR with weekly<br />
cisplatin 40mg/m2 IV (CDDP) from August 1998 to June 2004 in<br />
Hospital Haroldo Juacaba, a Brazilian northeastern hospital. The mean<br />
followup time was 50 months (2185 months) and the KaplanMeier<br />
method was used to calculate survival curves. The nonnormal<br />
distributions were evaluated by nonparametric tests, Cox regression<br />
was used to evaluate multivariate analysis and P values =< 0, 05 were<br />
considered significant.<br />
: Local control rates were 39.6% for exclusively radiation and<br />
50.5% for chemoradiation. There was no statistically significant<br />
difference between groups (p = 0.19). The overall median 5year<br />
survival rate for exclusively radiation was 38.4% and 47.4% for<br />
chemoradiation. The results were not statistically significant (p =<br />
0.36). The mean treatment time was 61 days (39 to 2<strong>10</strong> days). Both<br />
local control and overall survival rates were affected by age,<br />
parametrial involvement and the timing <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy (p0.05). But less than six cycles <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy improved<br />
local control rates better than six or more cycles (55.1% versus 44.9%<br />
p = 0.02).<br />
: The bilateral parametrium infiltration (hazard ratio=<br />
2.96 95% CI 1.306.76 p=0.009) and age
S<strong>10</strong>0 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
: To assess feasibility and implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
Interstitial implant using thermoplastic Poly Ether Etherketone<br />
(PEEK) catheters for MRIbased brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> advanced cervical<br />
cancer in the absence <strong>of</strong> MR compatible applicators.<br />
: <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> in cervical cancer is integral<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the treatment. Gynecological (GYN) GECESTRO introduced<br />
concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix<br />
cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment <strong>of</strong> GTV and<br />
CTV and given the recommendations.<br />
We have treated few cases <strong>of</strong> stage IIIB cervical cancer first with<br />
external beam radiotherapy to a dose <strong>of</strong> 50 Gy in 25 fractions to<br />
whole pelvis using 3D conformal therapy. In our center we lack the MR<br />
Compatible <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> Applicators, but we use to treat them with<br />
interstitial brachytherapy using stainless steel needles with CT<br />
imaging. To overcome this we did implant using semiflexible<br />
thermoplastic PEEK catheters with Syed Neblett template. These<br />
catheters are biocompatible and whole applicator set is MR<br />
compatible. Dicom images <strong>of</strong> MRI T1 and T2 sequences were imported<br />
to Varian brachyvision. With the help <strong>of</strong> MRI we were able to<br />
reconstruct these catheters and volume were delineated in<br />
accordance with the GEC ESTRO recommendations. We have<br />
delineated GTV, HR CTV on T2 weighted images.<br />
: We prescribed the dose <strong>of</strong> 6Gy X4# to HR CTV. Volume<br />
optimization was done in Varian Brachyvision. Dose–volume histograms<br />
were calculated to evaluate doses to tumour, target volumes and<br />
<strong>org</strong>ans at risk. Dose values were biologically normalised to equivalent<br />
doses in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2, equivalent to 50 cGy/h low dose rate)<br />
applying the linearquadratic model. The average tumor volume was<br />
58.8cc.The 3D dose volume parameters were D90 (6.65Gy) 87 EQD2,<br />
D<strong>10</strong>0 (5.25Gy) 77Gy EQD2, V15028.4cc, V200 15.67cc and the Dose<br />
to 2cc Rectum79 Gy EQD2, bladder 81Gy EQD2.<br />
: MR Based Interstitial <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> using PEEK catheters<br />
and GYN GECESTRO Guidelines is feasible. Further refinement and<br />
improvement in dose volume parameters especially rectum for pure<br />
interstitial HDR brachytherapy needs to be defined.<br />
PO248<br />
GYNAECOLOGICAL BRACHYTHERAPY: USING A SPREADING APPLICATOR<br />
TO INDIVIDUALIZE DOSE TO THE VAGINAL APEX<br />
J. Biesta 1 , L. KwakkelHuizenga 1 , T. Stam 1 , P. Koper 1 , T. Oorschot<br />
van 1 , M. Mast 1 , E. Kouwenhoven 1<br />
1<br />
Radiotherapy Centre West, Radiotherapy, Den Haag, The<br />
Netherlands<br />
: When using a standard applicator, the dose to the<br />
mucosa <strong>of</strong> the vaginal apex is <strong>of</strong>ten too low, since the vaginal fold at<br />
the top is generally wider than in the lower part. We, therefore,<br />
developed a vaginal applicator which can be expanded thus providing<br />
an optimal coverage <strong>of</strong> the mucosa <strong>of</strong> the vagina. Purpose <strong>of</strong> the study<br />
is to investigate the mucosal coverage using this applicator.<br />
: The spreading applicator consists <strong>of</strong> two<br />
identical parts that hinge at 7 cm from the top. The applicator is<br />
covered by a condom to ensure that no vaginal tissue will be caught<br />
between the two spreading parts.<br />
In ten patients two CTscans were made, one with the applicator<br />
closed and one with the applicator fully opened. In both scans vaginal<br />
contrast was used.<br />
The volume <strong>of</strong> contrast and air around the applicator was delineated<br />
in both scans and compared, see the figure. These volumes were<br />
determined for the cranial 5 cm <strong>of</strong> the vagina.<br />
: In the table the air/contrast volumes <strong>of</strong> both scans are<br />
presented.<br />
Patient Opened (cm 3 ) Closed (cm 3 )<br />
1 2.8 7.5<br />
2 3.6 <strong>10</strong>.3<br />
3 0.3 0.5<br />
4 0.0 0.0<br />
5 0.0 0.2<br />
6 0.6 3.7<br />
7 1.3 2.2<br />
8 0.7 2.1<br />
9 0.0 0.0<br />
<strong>10</strong> 0.0 0.6<br />
Mean 0.9 2.7<br />
SD 1.3 3.5<br />
: In 7 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>10</strong> patients we demonstrated that the<br />
mucosal coverage by the closed applicator was less optimal than by<br />
the opened applicator. This could lead to an underdosage <strong>of</strong> the<br />
vaginal mucosa. Further research will be performed and presented to<br />
show the effect on the isodose pattern using both applicator types.<br />
PO249<br />
HDR BRACHYTHERAPY BOOST IN GYNAECOLOGICAL CANCERS, WHAT'S<br />
THE PERFECT TIMING TO PREVENT VAGINAL STENOSIS?<br />
F. Piro 1 , D. Cosentino 1 , P. Indrieri 1 , P. Ziccarelli 1 , L. Ziccarelli 1 , L.<br />
Marafioti 1<br />
1 Mariano Santo, Radiotherapy, Cosenza, Italy<br />
: To evaluate the best timing schedule, after or<br />
before 3D conformal radiotherapy (ERT), <strong>of</strong> high dose rate<br />
brachytherapy boost (BBRT) in gynaecological cancers in an<br />
experience <strong>of</strong> the unique regional Center performing BBRT.<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S <strong>10</strong>1<br />
: From January 2009 196 pts. with endometrial<br />
cancer were treated with BBRT plus ERT in postoperative setting as<br />
out patients. The treatment schedule was 18 Gy in 3 fractions as<br />
boost before ERT to pts. <strong>of</strong> our Center (group A), to pts. by others<br />
Centers BBRT (group B) was performed after ERT (conformal 3D<br />
radiotherapy in both cases) the dose was prescribed to 5 mm from the<br />
surface <strong>of</strong> the applicator 3 cm the active length <strong>of</strong> the source. The<br />
implant optimisation was performed recognizing the bladder dose and<br />
the rectal dose as average <strong>of</strong> almost 3 points for each critical <strong>org</strong>an<br />
with a semi3D technique aided by simulator, the optimal targetdose<br />
volume was determined with radiopaque marker into the rectum and<br />
Foley catheter balloon in the bladder. We measured the lenght and<br />
the diameter <strong>of</strong> each vaginal cilinder so we calculated the volume <strong>of</strong><br />
treated vagina. By these data we enrolled a third observational group<br />
(C) consisting <strong>of</strong> only <strong>10</strong> pts. from our center with volume <strong>of</strong> treated<br />
vagina measured before and after ERT and finally underwent to BBRT.<br />
: In the group A we enrolled 116 pts. the others 70 in group B.<br />
The median lenght, diameter and volume <strong>of</strong> both groups resulted the<br />
same, while the recorded ranges <strong>of</strong> each parameter were different<br />
expecially for measured volume ( 7.530 cm³ for A versus 530 cm³ for<br />
B ).In the B group we also recorded pain during the introduction <strong>of</strong><br />
vaginal cilinder and acute toxicity G1G2 <strong>of</strong> bladder and rectum,<br />
requiring supportive care by ERT; so the vaginal introduction <strong>of</strong><br />
complete cilinder was more difficult than group A. In group C the<br />
median reduction <strong>of</strong> the measured volume <strong>of</strong> vagina resulted 25% (<strong>10</strong><br />
35%).In the group A the vaginal lenght at the first follow up after the<br />
treatment completation was the nearest to the lenght during the<br />
simulation. In the B group the BBRT was performed 23 weeks after<br />
the completation <strong>of</strong> ERT.<br />
: The use <strong>of</strong> HDR Brachitherapy to boost gynaecological<br />
cancers is widely accepted. Vaginal stenosis by Radiotherapy is an<br />
acute toxicity that starts at the beginning <strong>of</strong> treatment and increases<br />
using small vagynal cilinder, so to obtain a perfect timing for boost<br />
after ERT we need more collaboration with the neighbouring centers.<br />
Boost before ERT increases pts. compliance to treatment and probably<br />
reduces geographic missing.<br />
PO250<br />
CONCURRENT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY WITH HDR INTRACAVITARY<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CERVICAL CANCER: A PHASE II STUDY<br />
T. Toita 1 , R. Kitagawa 2 , T. Hamano 3 , K. Umayahara 4 , Y. Hirashima 5 , Y.<br />
Aoki 6 , M. Oguchi 7 , M. Mikami 8 , K. Takizawa 4<br />
1<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Ryukyus, Radiology, Okinawa, Japan<br />
2<br />
NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo, Japan<br />
3<br />
Kitasato University, Biostatistics, Tokyo, Japan<br />
4<br />
Cancer Institute Hospital, Gynecology, Tokyo, Japan<br />
5<br />
Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Gynecology, Shizuoka, Japan<br />
6<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Ryukyus, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Okinawa, Japan<br />
7<br />
Cancer Institute Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Tokyo, Japan<br />
8<br />
Tokai University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology,<br />
Kanagawa, Japan<br />
: A multicenter phase II trial was conducted to<br />
assess the efficacy and toxicity <strong>of</strong> concurrent chemoradiotherapy<br />
(CCRT) with highdoserate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDRICBT)<br />
using a low cumulative dose schedule in patients with locally<br />
advanced uterine cervical cancer.<br />
: The Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group<br />
(JGOG) study JGOG<strong>10</strong>66 enrolled patients with FIGO stage IIIIVA<br />
cervical cancer who had no paraaortic lymphadenopathy (> <strong>10</strong>mm) as<br />
assessed by CT. Patients received definitive radiotherapy consisting <strong>of</strong><br />
wholepelvis external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), pelvic EBRT with<br />
midline block, and HDRICBT. The cumulative linear quadratic<br />
equivalent dose (EQD2) was 6265 Gy prescribed at point A. Three<br />
dimensional planning using CT/MRI was not applied. Cisplatin (40<br />
mg/m 2 weekly) was administered concurrently with radiotherapy for 5<br />
courses. All patients received individual case review <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy<br />
quality assurance.<br />
: Of the 72 patients registered from 25 institutions between<br />
March 2008 and January 2009, 71 patients were eligible. Median age<br />
<strong>of</strong> the patients was 57 years. FIGO stages were IIIA in 3 patinets, IIIB<br />
in 64 patients, and IVA in 4 patients. Median tumor diameter, as<br />
assessed by MRI, was 55 mm. With a median followup <strong>of</strong> 28 months,<br />
21 patients had pelvic failure (primary=14, node=6, other=1), and 17<br />
patients developed distant metastases (paraaortic=11, lung=2,<br />
other=4). The 2year pelvic disease progressionfree rate (PDF) was<br />
73% (95% CI, 61% to 82%). The 2year progressionfree survival rate<br />
and overall survival rate were 66% (95% CI, 54% to 76%), and 90% (95%<br />
CI, 80% to 95%), respectively. The 2year cumulative late complication<br />
rates by grades were 24% for all grades, 9% for grade 1, <strong>12</strong>% for grade<br />
2, 3% for grade 3, and 0 for grades 4/5.<br />
: Despite a limited followup period, the JGOG<strong>10</strong>66 study<br />
demonstrated that CCRT using HDRICBT with a low cumulative RT<br />
dose schedule achieved comparable pelvic disease control to that<br />
achieved with global dose schedules (EQD2=85Gy), with a lower<br />
incidence <strong>of</strong> late toxicity for patients with locally advanced uterine<br />
cervical cancer.<br />
PO251<br />
IMPACT OF BLADDER DISTENSION ON ORGANS AT RISK IN 3D<br />
INTRACAVITARY BRACHYTHERAPY FOR GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER<br />
H. Bajwa 1 , K. Rehman 1 , I. Niazi 2 , M. Ali 2 , I. Haider 1 , S. Usman 1 , A.<br />
Masood 1<br />
1<br />
Shaukat khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital, Radiotherapy, Lahore,<br />
Pakistan<br />
2<br />
Shaukat khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital, Radiology, Lahore,<br />
Pakistan<br />
: To determine the effects <strong>of</strong> bladder distension on<br />
<strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OAR) in intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) for<br />
gynecological cancer with 3D Image Based Planning<br />
: Thirtytwo patients with gynecological cancer<br />
were treated with highdose radiation (HDR) brachytherapy, out <strong>of</strong><br />
which twentyeight were diagnosed with cervical cancer and treated<br />
with 700 cGy/fraction for 4 fractions and the remaining four were<br />
diagnosed with endometrium cancer and treated with 600<br />
cGy/fraction for 2 fractions. Pelvic CT scans were obtained from<br />
patients with indwelling catheters in place defined as empty bladder)<br />
and from patients who received 200 cc injections <strong>of</strong> sterile water in<br />
their bladders (defined as full bladder) for threedimensional (3D)<br />
analysis. Regions <strong>of</strong> Interest (ROI) were drawn by a radiologist for four<br />
<strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OAR): bladder, rectum, sigmoid colon and small bowel.<br />
All planning parameters including dwell positions and dwell times<br />
were kept constant for both plans. Dose Volume Histograms (DVHs)<br />
were used to compare the maximum dose and the mean dose <strong>of</strong> the<br />
OAR when the patient had empty bladder (Emax and Emean<br />
respectively) with the maximum dose and mean dose when the<br />
patient had full bladder (Fmax and Fmean respectively).<br />
: The Emean <strong>of</strong> bladder was 277cGy and the Fmean was<br />
208cGy (P = 0.000) and Emax <strong>of</strong> bladder was 17<strong>10</strong> cGy and Fmax was<br />
2298cGy (P = 0.000).<br />
The Emean <strong>of</strong> rectum was 196cGy and the Fmean was 198cGy (P =<br />
0.000) and Emax <strong>of</strong> rectum was 986cGy and Fmax was 951cGy (P =<br />
0.058).<br />
The Emean <strong>of</strong> sigmoid colon was 135cGy and the Fmean was <strong>10</strong>7cGy (P<br />
= 0.000) and Emax <strong>of</strong> sigmoid colon was 1792cGy and Fmax was<br />
899cGy (P = 0.000).<br />
The Emean <strong>of</strong> small bowel was <strong>10</strong>4cGy and the Fmean was 67cGy (P =<br />
0.000) and Emax <strong>of</strong> small bowel was 1469cGy and Fmax was 609cGy (P<br />
= 0.000).<br />
: This study shows that treating patients with full bladder<br />
results in reduced <strong>org</strong>anexposure in the case <strong>of</strong> sigmoid colon and<br />
small bowel. Although the maximum bladder dose was higher, the<br />
mean dose was less, reducing thereby the risk <strong>of</strong> complications. The<br />
rectal dose, however, was not affected by the bladder state.<br />
PO252<br />
ADJUVANT CARBOPLATIN/PACLITAXEL AND INTRAVAGINAL RADIATION<br />
FOR STAGE III SEROUS ENDOMETRIAL CANCER<br />
A. Kiess 1 , S. Damast 2 , V. Makker 3 , M.A. Kollmeier 1 , G.J. Gardner 4 , N.R.<br />
AbuRustum 4 , R.R. Barakat 4 , K.M. Alektiar 1<br />
1<br />
Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Dept <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />
Oncology, New York NY, USA<br />
2<br />
Yale School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Dept <strong>of</strong> Therapeutic Radiology, New Haven<br />
CT, USA<br />
3<br />
Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Gynecologic Medical<br />
Oncology Service, New York NY, USA
S<strong>10</strong>2 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
4 Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Gynecology Service, New<br />
York NY, USA<br />
: The optimal management for early stage high risk<br />
endometrial cancer is evolving. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is to report<br />
a single institution experience with concurrent adjuvant intravaginal<br />
radiation (IVRT) and carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy for early<br />
stage serous endometrial cancer.<br />
: From <strong>10</strong>/2000 to <strong>12</strong>/2009, 41 women with<br />
stage III (FIGO 2009) serous endometrial cancer were treated with<br />
surgery followed by high dose rate IVRT using Ir192 (median dose <strong>of</strong><br />
21 Gy in 3 fractions) and concurrent carboplatin (AUC=5) and<br />
paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) given every three weeks for six planned<br />
cycles. Each IVRT fraction was given in between cycles <strong>of</strong><br />
chemotherapy with an interval <strong>of</strong> at least 1 week between<br />
treatments. Patients with positive peritoneal cytology were excluded.<br />
Toxicities were recorded by CTCAE criteria (version 3). KaplanMeier<br />
methods were used to estimate survival, and the logrank test was<br />
used for comparison.<br />
: The mean age was 67 years (range, 5180 years). Surgery<br />
consisted <strong>of</strong> hysterectomy (TAH/BSO in 51%, LAVH/BSO in 49%),<br />
peritoneal washing, omental biopsy, pelvic lymph node dissection<br />
(median 16 nodes), and selective paraaortic node sampling (in 93%,<br />
median 6 nodes). Thirty patients had stage IA disease (73%), 4 had<br />
stage IB (<strong>10</strong>%), and 7 had stage II, i.e. cervical stromal invasion (17%).<br />
Histology was pure serous in 68% and mixed in 32% <strong>of</strong> patients. Thirty<br />
five patients (85%) completed all 6 cycles <strong>of</strong> carboplatin/paclitaxel<br />
and 3 IVRT treatments. Six patients did not complete therapy due to<br />
allergy (1), physician preference (2), or toxicity (3). All toxicities (<strong>of</strong><br />
all grades) are presented in Table 1.<br />
With a median followup time <strong>of</strong> 58 months, the 5year diseasefree<br />
and overall survival rates were 85% (95% CI, 7396) and 90% (95% CI,<br />
80<strong>10</strong>0), respectively. The 5year actuarial recurrence rates were 9%<br />
in the pelvis, 5% in the paraaortic nodes, and <strong>10</strong>% at distant sites.<br />
None <strong>of</strong> the patients developed vaginal recurrence. Of the 4 patients<br />
with pelvic recurrence, 2 had isolated disease and were successfully<br />
salvaged. Patients with stage II disease had significantly lower<br />
diseasefree survival (71% vs 88%; p=0.017) and overall survival (71% vs<br />
93%; p=0.001) compared to patients with stage I disease.<br />
Table 1. Toxicity <strong>of</strong> combined adjuvant therapy.<br />
: Based on this study, concurrent adjuvant<br />
carboplatin/paclitaxel and IVRT provide excellent outcome for<br />
patients with early stage serous endometrial cancer. The subset <strong>of</strong><br />
patients with cervical stromal invasion (stage II) still represents a<br />
therapeutic challenge. The question <strong>of</strong> whether adjuvant IVRT and<br />
chemotherapy are superior to standard pelvic radiation will require<br />
further confirmation from the ongoing international randomized trial.<br />
PO253<br />
VAGINAL VAULT HDR BRACHYTHERAPY AS SOLE ADJUVANT THERAPY<br />
FOR ENDOMETRIAL CANCER<br />
A. Stillie 1 , M. Zahra 1<br />
1<br />
Western General Hospital, Clinical Oncology, Edinburgh, United<br />
Kingdom<br />
: To evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity <strong>of</strong> HDR<br />
vaginal vault brachytherapy as sole adjuvant therapy, following<br />
hysterectomy, for high intermediate risk endometrial cancer.<br />
: HDR vaginal vault brachytherapy was<br />
introduced in this centre in January 2009. Between 30/1/2009<br />
29/<strong>10</strong>/20<strong>10</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> forty patients, treated with adjuvant HDR<br />
vaginal vault brachytherapy as sole adjuvant therapy for endometrial<br />
cancer, were identified. Patients were treated with a single line<br />
source vaginal applicator (Varian Medical Systems) to deliver a dose <strong>of</strong><br />
7Gy per fraction to a depth <strong>of</strong> 5mm from the applicator surface. A<br />
total <strong>of</strong> three fractions were administered once a week with an<br />
overall treatment time <strong>of</strong> 14 days to deliver 21Gy in 3 fractions.<br />
: The median age <strong>of</strong> patients at diagnosis was 69. Patients<br />
were managed surgically with a TAH or TLH, BSO, and washings. One<br />
patient did not undergo resection <strong>of</strong> the cervix due to perioperative<br />
complications associated with their elevated BMI. The majority <strong>of</strong><br />
patients (65%) had FIGO Stage IB disease. Ten patients (25%) had<br />
involvement <strong>of</strong> the cervical glands. At a median follow up <strong>of</strong> 22<br />
months two patients (5%) have died from disseminated endometrial<br />
cancer. High risk features were present at diagnosis in one patient<br />
(LVSI, Grade 3, Clear Cell histology) however due to advanced age and<br />
significant medical co morbidities additional adjuvant therapy in the<br />
form <strong>of</strong> systemic chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy was not<br />
administered. The other patient had no high risk features present at<br />
diagnosis and developed pulmonary metastases, but no loco regional<br />
recurrence, within 6 months <strong>of</strong> adjuvant treatment. A third patient<br />
developed loco regional relapse and remains alive with stable disease<br />
following a course <strong>of</strong> palliative chemotherapy. In this case the initial<br />
pathology was reported as a grade 2 adenocarcinoma with no high risk<br />
features. Biopsy <strong>of</strong> the vaginal vault recurrence demonstrated a<br />
degree <strong>of</strong> serous papillary differentiation. A pathology review <strong>of</strong> the<br />
original specimen, following the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> relapse, confirmed no<br />
evidence <strong>of</strong> high risk features.<br />
Toxicity data was recorded at each clinic visit for all patients, there<br />
were no significant toxicities identified. Grade 1 vaginal stenosis was<br />
reported in a small proportion <strong>of</strong> patients.<br />
: HDR vaginal vault brachytherapy for high intermediate<br />
risk endometrial cancer is a well tolerated treatment associated with<br />
high rates <strong>of</strong> pelvic control.<br />
PO254<br />
HDR BRACHYTHERAPY FOR HIGH GRADE VAGINAL INTRAEPITHELIAL<br />
NEOPLASIA<br />
S.H. Mhlanga 1 , L. Pule 1 , F. Mohammed 2 , J.A. Kotzen 2<br />
1<br />
Charlotte Maxeke Hospital, Medical Physics, Johannesburg, South<br />
Africa<br />
2<br />
Charlotte Maxeke Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Johannesburg, South<br />
Africa<br />
: To determine the efficacy and safety <strong>of</strong> High<br />
Dose Rate (HDR ) <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> for High GradeVaginal Intraepithelial<br />
Neoplasia.<br />
: A retrospective study <strong>of</strong> patients treated with<br />
HDR <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> at Johannesburg hospital from 2007 to 2011 was<br />
performed by reviewing patient charts.There were 6 patients . A Dose<br />
<strong>of</strong> 54 Gy in 18 twice daily fractions <strong>of</strong> 3.0 Gy each was delivered to<br />
5mm from the surface <strong>of</strong> a personalized vaginal mould.<br />
: No patients have relapsed. There was one case <strong>of</strong> severe<br />
mucositis.<br />
: Fractionated HDR <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> appears to be an<br />
effective modality for controlling High Grade Vaginal Intraepithelial<br />
Neoplasia, with an acceptable complication rate.<br />
PO255<br />
HIGH DOSERATE INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY FOR GYNECOLOGICAL<br />
MALIGNANCIES<br />
N. Murakami 1 , T. Kasamatsu 2 , K. Takahashi 1 , K. Inaba 1 , Y. Kuroda 1 , M.<br />
Morota 1 , H. <strong>May</strong>ahara 1 , Y. Ito 1 , M. Sumi 1 , J. Itami 1<br />
1 National Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, Tokyo, Japan<br />
2 National Cancer Center, Gynecologic Oncology, Tokyo, Japan<br />
: The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is to retrospectively<br />
analyze the results <strong>of</strong> high doserate interstitial brachytherapy<br />
(HDRIBT) for gynecological malignancies.<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S <strong>10</strong>3<br />
: We reviewed the records <strong>of</strong> 39 patients with<br />
histologically confirmed gynecological malignancies who were treated<br />
by HDRIBT between 2008 and 2011 in our institution. Primary lesion<br />
was cervix in 21, vagina in 11, corpus in 4, ovary in 2, and vulva in 1.<br />
Thirteen patients were treated as a primary treatment, 18 as salvage<br />
for recurrence after prior surgery, 4 for residual lesion after surgery,<br />
and 4 as salvage for recurrence after prior radiation therapy.<br />
Squamous cell carcinoma was seen in 23, adenocarcinoma in 13, and<br />
the remaining 3 had other histologies. Median tumor size was 3.7cm<br />
(range 18cm). Thirty one patients were treated by radiation therapy<br />
alone and 8 patients were irradiated concurrent with chemotherapy.<br />
In the patients without prior radiation therapy, pelvic external<br />
irradiation was performed before HDRIBT. Median dose <strong>of</strong> pelvic<br />
irradiation was 30 Gy (range 2650 Gy). Either metallic or plastic<br />
needle applicators were used for HDRIBT. Median number <strong>of</strong><br />
applicators was 15 (range 529). Dose per fraction for HDRIBT was<br />
either 4 or 6 Gy and median fraction <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy was 4 (range 3<br />
9). Median clinical target volume (CTV) was 35.5 ml (range 2.4142.1<br />
ml), median CTV D90 was 6.16 Gy (range 4.388.15 Gy), median<br />
rectum D2cc was 3.47 Gy (range 0.995.81 Gy), and median bladder D2cc<br />
was 3.69 Gy (range 1.015.88 Gy). Median followup period was 16.3<br />
months (range 6.038.1 months). We calculated treatment result <strong>of</strong><br />
local control (LC), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival<br />
(OS). We also tried to identify the prognostic factors <strong>of</strong> LC and<br />
treatment complications using univariate analysis.<br />
: The 2year LC, PFS, OS for all patients were 73.8%, 51.9% and<br />
69.6% respectively. The frequency <strong>of</strong> local recurrence and distant<br />
metastasis was 23.1% (9/39 pt.) and 20.5% (8/39 pt.). Vaginal ulcer<br />
was seen in 3 patients, 2 <strong>of</strong> them were recurrence case after prior<br />
radiation therapy. Treatment indication as primary treatment, no<br />
prior chemotherapy, performance <strong>of</strong> pelvic irradiation combined with<br />
brachytherapy, and usage <strong>of</strong> concurrent chemotherapy showed<br />
tendency for good LC (p=0.<strong>10</strong>3, 0.06, 0.115 and 0.111). Regarding<br />
vaginal ulcer, prior radiation therapy before treatment was a<br />
statistically significant prognostic factor(p=0.034)<br />
: HDRIBT for gynecologic cancers both for primary and<br />
salvage treatment yields good result. Attention must be paid<br />
regarding vaginal ulcer for patients who had experience <strong>of</strong> prior<br />
radiation therapy and dose parameter predicting vaginal morbidities<br />
must be sought.<br />
PO256<br />
CT IMAGE GUIDED LOW DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CERVICAL<br />
CANCER: TRANSITIONING FROM 2D TO 3D, ARE WE THERE YET?<br />
C. Nelson 1 , V. Narra 1 , S. Motwani 1 , M. Gabel 1<br />
1<br />
Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />
Oncology, New Jersey, USA<br />
: Traditional lowdoserate (LDR) brachytherapy<br />
for cervical cancer utilizes 2D imaging and reference points<br />
approximating target dose and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OAR). Recent image<br />
guided brachytherapy (IGBT) advances with MRI compatible LDR<br />
applicators allow for 3D planning but are limited to facilities with MRI<br />
machines. For those facilities with CT simulators, the CTcompatible<br />
Henschke applicator (Mick RadioNuclear Instruments, Inc; Mount<br />
Vernon, NY) provides IGBT capabilities for LDR cervical<br />
brachytherapy. We report our initial institutional experience using CT<br />
guided LDR for cervical cancer.<br />
: Between December 2009 and September<br />
2011, definitive LDR brachytherapy was delivered in 19 consecutive<br />
treatments to 11 patients at Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital.<br />
All patients received 4547.6 Gy (median 45 Gy) <strong>of</strong> external beam<br />
radiotherapy to the whole pelvis. Intracavitary insertions were<br />
performed twice for 9 patients and a single insertion for 2 patients.<br />
CT scans were obtained and the intended dose prescribed to Point A<br />
was 90 Gy. OAR volumes for bladder, rectum, sigmoid and small bowel<br />
were contoured and the 1, 2 and 5 cc <strong>org</strong>an volumes were compared<br />
to ICRU reference point dose estimates.<br />
: Total Point A doses ranged from 84.7 to 92.9 Gy, with mean<br />
dose <strong>of</strong> 88.8 Gy. The mean rectal point dose (57.0 Gy) was 64% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Pt A dose, compared to the 1, 2, and 5 cc rectal volume doses <strong>of</strong> 78%<br />
(69.3 Gy), 76% (67.4 Gy) and 72% (64.0 Gy) respectively. Mean mid<br />
Foley balloon point dose (64.7 Gy) was 73% <strong>of</strong> Pt A compared to 95%<br />
(84.1 Gy), 91% (80.6 Gy), and 84% (74.6 Gy) to 1, 2, and 5 cc <strong>of</strong><br />
bladder respectively. Mean rectosigmoid point dose approximation<br />
(58.3 Gy) was 66% <strong>of</strong> Pt A compared to 1, 2, and 5 cc <strong>of</strong> sigmoid<br />
volumes doses <strong>of</strong> 76% (67.6 Gy), 73% (64.8 Gy) and 69% (61.1 Gy)<br />
respectively. Mean dose to small bowel was 81% <strong>of</strong> Pt A dose to 1 cc<br />
(72.3 Gy), 79% (70.6 Gy) to 2cc, and 75% (66.8 Gy) to 5 cc <strong>of</strong> bowel.<br />
The volumetric doses consistently exceeded ICRU point dose estimates<br />
to rectum, bladder and sigmoid by 118%, <strong>12</strong>5% and 111% respectively.<br />
With median follow up <strong>of</strong> 11.4 months, 9% <strong>of</strong> patients reported Grade<br />
<strong>12</strong> urinary toxicity, 18% Grade 2 dyspareunia and 27% reported pelvic<br />
pain requiring medication.<br />
: CT based imageguided brachytherapy allows for precise<br />
tumor and normal tissue dose calculations for LDR brachytherapy.<br />
However, traditional ICRU point estimates to predict rectal, bladder<br />
and sigmoid doses consistently underestimate volumetric doses to<br />
these <strong>org</strong>ans. In this series, CT imaging revealed small bowel adjacent<br />
to the uterus in the majority <strong>of</strong> cases that received substantial<br />
radiation dose. When transitioning from 2D to 3D brachytherapy<br />
planning, GECESTRO and ABS dose guidelines should be followed<br />
closely to minimize potential for <strong>org</strong>an toxicity. Target delineation<br />
and <strong>org</strong>an dose limits for CT based planning for LDR should build on<br />
the growing experience with MRI based LDR to define safe and<br />
effective dosing.<br />
PO257<br />
DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS (DVT) RATES IN PATIENTS RECEIVING<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CERVICAL CANCER<br />
A. Caley 1 , A. Hickman 1 , K. Frantzeskou 1 , E. Hudson 1 , K. Parker 1 , I.<br />
Appadurai 2 , R. Rayment 3 , S. Noble 4 , L. Hanna 1<br />
1 Velindre Cancer Centre, Clinical Oncology, Cardiff, United Kingdom<br />
2 University Hospital <strong>of</strong> Wales, Anaesthetics, Cardiff, United Kingdom<br />
3 University Hospital <strong>of</strong> Wales, Haematology, Cardiff, United Kingdom<br />
4 Royal Gwent Hospital, Palliative Care, Newport, United Kingdom
S<strong>10</strong>4 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
: Patients with pelvic malignancy have an<br />
increased risk <strong>of</strong> DVT but the incidence <strong>of</strong> DVT associated with<br />
brachytherapy for cervical cancer is unknown. A study was undertaken<br />
to assess the rate <strong>of</strong> DVT in this population.<br />
: Since April 20<strong>10</strong> all patients having<br />
brachytherapy for cervical cancer at our cancer centre have<br />
undergone weekly bilateral Doppler ultrasound scans (DUSS) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
lower limb veins for three weeks, at the time <strong>of</strong> each scheduled<br />
insertion. Patients receive mechanical thromboprophylaxis with TED<br />
stockings. The case records <strong>of</strong> the last 52 patients to have undergone<br />
brachytherapy prior to the introduction <strong>of</strong> DUSS were also examined<br />
to assess the incidence <strong>of</strong> significant thromboembolic <strong>events</strong>.<br />
: 32 patients were planned to have brachytherapy for cervical<br />
cancer. One patient developed a large pulmonary embolus during<br />
external beam chemoradiotherapy and did not have brachytherapy,<br />
and five others (16%) were found to have below knee DVTs at the<br />
time <strong>of</strong> their first brachytherapy insertion. Of the 31 patients who<br />
underwent brachytherapy, 3 (<strong>10</strong>%) developed asymptomatic below<br />
knee DVTs after one insertion and a further 3 (<strong>10</strong>%) after two<br />
insertions. Of the six positive cases at week 3, 3 had repeat DUSS at<br />
6weeks and all had resolved. All those with DVTs were treated with<br />
low molecularweightheparin as per local practice; one had clot<br />
progression to the popliteal vein and one developed bleeding<br />
requiring transfusion. Of 52 patients who received brachytherapy prior<br />
to the introduction <strong>of</strong> DUSS, 2 developed significant thromboembolic<br />
<strong>events</strong> (1 ile<strong>of</strong>emoral DVT and 1 bilateral pulmonary embolism) at 4<br />
months and 1 year respectively, both coinciding with significant<br />
disease progression.<br />
: There is a high incidence <strong>of</strong> asymptomatic below knee<br />
DVTs in this population but their clinical significance is uncertain.<br />
There are no guidelines to help with the management. The low<br />
incidence <strong>of</strong> symptomatic thromboses in the 52 patients prior to the<br />
introduction <strong>of</strong> DUSS suggests that most asymptomatic DVTs do not<br />
lead to adverse outcomes.<br />
PO258<br />
CLINICAL RESULTS OF VAGINAL BRACHYTHERAPY DELIVERED WITH A<br />
RING APPLICATOR FOR ENDOMETRIAL CANCER<br />
P. Meijnen 1 , N. Bijker 2 , C. Koedooder 2 , B.R. Pieters 2<br />
1<br />
The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek<br />
Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands<br />
2<br />
Academic Medical Centre, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The<br />
Netherlands<br />
: Vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) delivered with a<br />
cylinder applicator (figure 1), with the reference isodose covering the<br />
proximal half <strong>of</strong> the vagina has become the standard treatment after<br />
surgery for highintermediate risk endometrial cancer. Since most<br />
recurrences develop in the vaginal vault we advocate the use <strong>of</strong> a ring<br />
applicator (RA) (figure 1) with the reference isodose covering the<br />
vaginal vault at 5 mm from the surface. Minimization <strong>of</strong> radiated<br />
volume would preferably lead to less vaginal toxicity and a better<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> life. In this report we analysed the number <strong>of</strong> vaginal,<br />
pelvic and distant failures after VBT delivered with a RA.<br />
Figure 1. cylinder and ring applicator<br />
: Between 2001 and 2009, 1<strong>12</strong> patients were<br />
referred to our department for VBT after surgery for a stage IA or IB<br />
(FIGO 2009) intermediate risk endometrial cancer. Surgery consisted<br />
<strong>of</strong> a total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo<br />
oophorectomy without routine lymphadenectomy. Medical files were<br />
retrospectively analysed. The KaplanMeier method was used for<br />
failure analysis.<br />
: VBT was delivered with a RA in <strong>10</strong>0 (89%) patients by LDR (26<br />
patients) or PDR brachytherapy (74 patients) to a total dose <strong>of</strong> 30 or<br />
28 Gy, respectively. 82 patients were diagnosed with high<br />
intermediate risk and 18 patients with lowintermediate risk<br />
endometrial cancer. 79 patients had stage IB (FIGO 2009) disease<br />
based on a least 50% myometrial invasion, 77 patients were 60 years<br />
or older, and 44 and 20 patients had grade 2 and 3 disease,<br />
respectively. Vascular invasion was present in four patients while five<br />
patients were diagnosed with a clear cell carcinoma. 15 patients had<br />
a history <strong>of</strong> previous malignant disease. Lymphadenectomy was<br />
performed in 13 patients. Median age at diagnosis was 65 years.<br />
Ninety percent <strong>of</strong> the patients underwent VBT within <strong>10</strong> weeks after<br />
surgery. At a median followup <strong>of</strong> 37 months (range 1<strong>10</strong>7) six (6%)<br />
patients showed failures. Three patients developed an infield<br />
recurrence in the vaginal vault 2, 30, and <strong>10</strong>1 months after VBT. One<br />
<strong>of</strong> these recurrences was isolated while the other two showed<br />
simultaneous pelvic and/or distant failure. A fourth patient developed<br />
an outfield recurrence in the posterior vaginal wall <strong>of</strong> the proximal<br />
half <strong>of</strong> the vagina including pelvic and distant failure. Two other<br />
patients showed only distant failure. The estimated 3year cumulative<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> any vaginal recurrence was 2.6% (95% CI, 06.3%). A total <strong>of</strong><br />
four (4%) patients died after disease progression within 3 to 13<br />
months.<br />
: VBT with the use <strong>of</strong> a RA covering the vaginal vault<br />
results in acceptably low vaginal failure rates. Since only one vaginal<br />
recurrence developed outfield <strong>of</strong> the vaginal vault, VBT delivered<br />
with a cylinder applicator with coverage <strong>of</strong> the proximal half <strong>of</strong> the<br />
vagina might be overtreatment resulting in unnecessary toxicity.<br />
PO259<br />
REEXAMINING ABS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR HDR VAGINAL<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY FOR UPSC OR CLEAR CELL ENDOMETRIAL CANCER<br />
M. Yondorf 1 , K. Holcomb 2 , D. Gupta 2 , T. Caputo 2 , P. Desai 1 , L.<br />
Nedialkova 1 , K.S.C. Chao 1 , B. Parashar 1 , D. Nori 1 , A.G. Wernicke 1<br />
1<br />
Weill Cornell Medical Center <strong>of</strong> Cornell University, Radiation<br />
Oncology, New York NY, USA<br />
2<br />
Weill Cornell Medical Center <strong>of</strong> Cornell University, GYN Oncology,<br />
New York NY, USA<br />
: The ABS recommends treating full length <strong>of</strong> the<br />
vagina (FLV) after hysterectomy in patients with Stage I and IIA (with<br />
less than 50%myometrial invasion) papillaryserous (UPSC) or clear cell<br />
(CC) endometrial cancer. We compare the rates <strong>of</strong> vaginal recurrence<br />
and acute toxicities in these patients treated with adjuvant HDR<br />
brachytherapy to FLV versus partial length <strong>of</strong> the vagina (PLV) [upper<br />
half or upper two thirds].<br />
: After obtaining an IRB approval, we<br />
conducted a retrospective analysis <strong>of</strong> 48 patients who underwent<br />
hysterectomy and complete surgical staging and were found to have<br />
Stages I or IIA (with less than 50% myiometrial invasion)UPSC or CC<br />
endometrial cancer and were treated with highdose rate (HDR)<br />
adjuvant brachytherapy between 2004 and 20<strong>10</strong>. These patients also<br />
received platinumbased adjuvant chemotherapy. The total HDR dose<br />
was 21Gy, in 7Gy per fraction, prescribed to depth <strong>of</strong> 0.5cm.<br />
Prescribed treatment length was FLV between January 2004 and<br />
October 2007, and PLV between October 2007 and January 20<strong>10</strong>.<br />
Follow up was every 3 months during 2 years and subsequently every 6<br />
months for 3 years and then annually after completion <strong>of</strong> treatment.<br />
Vaginal recurrences were assessed by physical exam and Pap smears.<br />
Acute toxicity was evaluated using the RTOG scale. Statistical<br />
considerations included logrank analysis and a paired ttest.<br />
: Of 48 patients in this study, 25/48 (52%) were treated with<br />
FLV and 23/48 (48%) were treated with PLV brachytherapy. The<br />
majority <strong>of</strong> subjects had Stage I disease: 88% and 86% in the FLV and<br />
PLV groups, respectively. There was a statistically significant<br />
difference in mean treatment lengths between 2 groups: <strong>10</strong>.5cm for<br />
FLV and 5.0cm for PLV (p
S<strong>10</strong>6 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
and NAG were 1.91 Gy (27% <strong>of</strong> Point A dose) and 1.85 Gy (26% <strong>of</strong> point<br />
A) respectively with a p value <strong>of</strong> 0.7. Mean Point BL doses in the AG<br />
and NAG were 1.89 Gy (27% <strong>of</strong> Point A dose) and 1.82 Gy (26% <strong>of</strong> Point<br />
A dose) respectively. The mean dose to rectal reference point was<br />
higher in the AG than NAG (5.09 Gy vs 4.49 Gy, p value 0.01). The<br />
mean dose to bladder reference point in the AG and NAG was 5.03 Gy<br />
and 4.90 Gy respectively (p value 0.6).<br />
Table 1. Dosimetric comparison with and without anesthesia.<br />
Numbers in parentheses represent standard deviation.<br />
: The results <strong>of</strong> our study reveal that HDRICBT dosimetry<br />
with and without anesthesia are comparable and therefore lack <strong>of</strong><br />
anesthesia does not compromise the HDRICBT dosimetry in cervical<br />
carcinoma patients.<br />
PO263<br />
DOSEVOLUME PARAMETERS IN CTBASED IMAGEGUIDED BRACHY<br />
THERAPY FOR CERVICAL CANCER<br />
K. Ando 1 , S. Kato 2 , M. Wakatsuki 3 , H. Kiyohara 1 , Y. Ohkubo 4 , K.<br />
Karasawa 3 , T. Nakano 1 , T. Kamada 3<br />
1<br />
Gunma University Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Radiation Oncology, Maebashi, Japan<br />
2<br />
Saitama Medical University International Medical Center,<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Saitama, Japan<br />
3<br />
National Institute <strong>of</strong> Radiological Sciences, Research Center Hospital<br />
for Charged Particle Therapy, Chiba, Japan<br />
4<br />
Saitama Cancer Center, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology, Saitama, Japan<br />
: To evaluate the efficacy <strong>of</strong> the dosevolume<br />
parameters as predictor for local tumor control and late complications<br />
in cervical cancer patients treated with computed tomography (CT)<br />
based image guided brachytherapy (IGBT).<br />
: Fiftytwo patients treated with CTbased<br />
IGBT between June 2008 and August 20<strong>10</strong> were analyzed. Median age<br />
was 65 years (range, 30–89 years). The FIGO stages <strong>of</strong> their disease<br />
were stage I in 11 patients, II in 18, III in <strong>12</strong> and IV in 11. Cervical<br />
tumor size ranged from 1.4 cm to 9.8 cm (median; 5.0 cm). All<br />
patients were treated with a combination <strong>of</strong> external beam<br />
radiotherapy (EBRT) and CTbased IGBT with or without cisplatin (40<br />
mg/m 2 <strong>of</strong> body surface per week for 5 weeks). The median total dose<br />
<strong>of</strong> EBRT was 49.6 Gy (range, 39.6–50.6 Gy). IGBT was performed once<br />
a week, with the median total dose to point A <strong>of</strong> 24 Gy in 4 fractions<br />
(range, <strong>10</strong>–29 Gy). 3D dosevolume parameters <strong>of</strong> the highrisk and<br />
intermediaterisk clinical target volumes (HRCTV and IRCTV, D<strong>10</strong>0<br />
and D90) and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk (D0.1cc, D1cc, D2cc <strong>of</strong> the rectum,<br />
sigmoid colon, and bladder) were calculated from the dosevolume<br />
histograms according to the GECESTRO recommendation. The<br />
relationships between the 3D dosevolume parameters and the local<br />
tumor control or late complications were analyzed.<br />
: The median followup duration <strong>of</strong> all patients was 21 months<br />
(range 440 months). The 2year overall survival and local control<br />
rates for all patients were 94.9% and 78.8%, respectively. The 2year<br />
local control rate for patients with tumor size < 4 cm was <strong>10</strong>0%.<br />
Among patients with tumor size > 4 cm, the 2year local control rates<br />
for patients receiving HRCTV D90 > 60 Gy, and those with HRCTV<br />
D90 < 60 Gy were 81.4% and 58.2%, respectively (p = 0.02). For IR<br />
CTV, no statistically significant differences were observed in all DVH<br />
parameters. Eight (15.4%) patients developed late rectum<br />
complication and 3 (5.8%) developed late bladder complication. All<br />
complications were classified as Grade 1 or 2. For bladder, the<br />
median values <strong>of</strong> D2cc for patients with and without late complication<br />
were 86.9 GyEQD2 and 61.0 GyEQD2, respectively (p = 0.01). For<br />
rectum, no statistically significant differences were observed in all<br />
DVH parameters between the patients with and without late<br />
complication.<br />
: In the current study, it was suggested that 3D dose<br />
volume parameters <strong>of</strong> the HRCTV and bladder were effective<br />
predictors for local tumor control and late complication.<br />
PO264<br />
INITIAL CLINICAL FOLLOWUP ON THE USE OF A CO60 HDR SOURCE<br />
FOR CERVICAL CANCER BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
Y. Nagar 1 , A. Palmer 2 , L. Ioannou 3 , O. Hayman 3<br />
1<br />
Portsmouth Hospital NHS Trust, Clinical Oncology Department,<br />
Portsmouth, United Kingdom<br />
2<br />
Portsmouth Hospital NHS Trust (& Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering and<br />
Physical Science University <strong>of</strong> Surrey), Medical Physics Dept.,<br />
Portsmouth, United Kingdom<br />
3<br />
Portsmouth Hospital NHS Trust, Medical Physics Dept., Portsmouth,<br />
United Kingdom<br />
: There is no published clinical data on the use <strong>of</strong><br />
Co60 sources for HDR brachytherapy, compared to the more<br />
widespread Ir192 sources. This work reports initial clinical results<br />
using a Co60 HDR brachytherapy source for cervical cancers.<br />
: Retrospective data was analysed for 14 HDR<br />
brachytherapy patients treated with a Co60 source, who also<br />
received external beam radiotherapy +/ concurrent chemotherapy:<br />
50% stage IIb, 21% stage III, 29% stage IV. Patients were treated from<br />
June 20<strong>10</strong> to August 2011, with follow up to January 20<strong>12</strong> (11 patients<br />
> 1 year). Response rate and acute and late toxicity were analysed.<br />
Treatment plans were analysed to determine mean and range GEC<br />
ESTRO dosimetric parameters, with assessment <strong>of</strong> correlation<br />
between plan and toxicity.<br />
<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> treatment was delivered using the Eckert & Ziegler<br />
BEBIG HDRMultisource.<br />
: Complete response in 64% <strong>of</strong> patients, partial response in<br />
29%, and no response in 7% (n=1). Table 1 presents the recorded<br />
toxicities for the patient group.<br />
Table 1: Acute and late toxicities for 14 patients treated with EBRT &<br />
Co60 HDR brachytherapy for cervical cancer<br />
The mean APoint dose was 8.1 Gy, D90 5.7 Gy, V<strong>10</strong>0 71.8%, V150<br />
45.7%, bladder D2cc 86.1%, and rectum D2cc 71.3%. There was no<br />
statistically significant correlation between dosimetric metrics and<br />
toxicities in our limited data.<br />
: <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> using Co60 source results in acceptable<br />
acute and late toxicities, with excellent response rates in our early<br />
experience with a limited number <strong>of</strong> patients. We propose to present<br />
more mature data in 35 years.<br />
PO265<br />
CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES OF HDR SOURCE ANISOTROPY IN VAGINAL<br />
CYLINDER TREATMENTS<br />
S.J.E.A. Bus 1 , G.H. Olijve 1 , B.J. Oosterveld 1 , T.G. Janssen 1 , E.M. van<br />
der SteenBanasik 1<br />
1<br />
ARTI Arnhems RadioTherapy Inst., Radiation Oncology, Arnhem,<br />
The Netherlands<br />
: To evaluate whether compensation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
anisotropy <strong>of</strong> the HDR source used in the Flexitron afterloader has<br />
clinical relevance for dosimetric issues in vaginal vault brachytherapy<br />
applied with a vaginal cylinder.<br />
: In our institute postoperative vaginal<br />
brachytherapy is applied with a vaginal cylinder. The diameter <strong>of</strong> the<br />
cylinder is selected by clinical examination and the application is CT<br />
guided to avoid air gaps and to estimate D2cc <strong>of</strong> OAR.<br />
Treatment plans are made for 7 Gy prescribed at 5 mm from the<br />
cylinder surface and cylinder apex with <strong>10</strong>0% isodose around the<br />
cylinder from apex to the proximal half <strong>of</strong> the vagina. Previously, we<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S <strong>10</strong>7<br />
used to work with a microSelectron PDR but after installation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Flexitron HDR we found significant differences in the dose<br />
distributions due to source anisotropy caused by the larger HDR<br />
source. We compared PDR treatment plans (Plato BPS) with HDR<br />
treatment plans (Flexiplan) with various cylinder diameters (range 24<br />
cm), using the same dwell positions and dwell times and choosing the<br />
same dose points. We observed approximately 28% underdosage at the<br />
vaginal top in HDR plans compared to PDR plans, with a size at the<br />
surface <strong>of</strong> the cylinder depending on the diameter <strong>of</strong> the cylinder.<br />
It has always been assumed that positioning differences <strong>of</strong> the<br />
cylinder in regard to the vaginal mucosa for every fraction would<br />
average out the underdosage due to anisotropy. To evaluate the<br />
positioning <strong>of</strong> the vaginal mucosa in relation to the cylinder surface<br />
one haemoclip was sutured at the top <strong>of</strong> the vagina in the area where<br />
anisotropic dose is expected. Each fraction <strong>of</strong> HDR was preceded by a<br />
CT with corresponding slices. We repeated this procedure in 3<br />
patients, making 3 corresponding CTscans in each patient.<br />
: We found that in the CTscans made in 3 patients only one<br />
image showed a haemoclip shift >1.5 mm. Because <strong>of</strong> these findings<br />
we believe to have found sufficient evidence to assume that between<br />
fractions there is no significant change <strong>of</strong> the position <strong>of</strong> the mucosa<br />
in relation to the cylinder surface which could compensate for the<br />
underdosage in the anisotropy area.<br />
: We conclude that in HDR treatment underdosage due to<br />
source anisotropy at the vaginal top is a relevant clinical issue.<br />
Therefore we decided to optimize the dose in the anisotropy area by<br />
adjusting the dwell positions and dwell times in such a way that the<br />
maximum dose at the surface <strong>of</strong> the cylinder is the same as with the<br />
PDR treatments. The remaining small areas <strong>of</strong> under and overdose<br />
respectively at the top and laterally from the top have to be<br />
accepted.<br />
PO266<br />
IS AN MRI REQUIRED ON EACH FRACTION? AN EXPERIENCE WITH MRI<br />
GUIDED BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CERVICAL CANCER<br />
J. Chino 1 , J. Maurer 1 , B. Steffey 1 , J. Cai 1 , J. Adamson 1 , O.<br />
Craciunescu 1<br />
1<br />
Duke University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Durham NC,<br />
USA<br />
: MRI guidance has shown great promise at<br />
improving target definition and predictive dosimetric indices for the<br />
use <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy for cervical cancer. It is unclear, however, if use<br />
<strong>of</strong> MRI beyond the first fraction is useful in clinical practice. We<br />
examined our experience <strong>of</strong> using MRI with every fraction for<br />
variations among fractions that would suggest a meaningful difference<br />
in dose to tumor or normal tissue.<br />
: We retrospectively identified 6 patients<br />
treated with a combined total <strong>of</strong> 29 fractions in whom MRI guidance<br />
was used for treatment planning from 201<strong>12</strong>0<strong>12</strong> at Duke University<br />
Medical Center. Treatments were given twice a week after completing<br />
whole pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy, with a median<br />
<strong>of</strong> five fractions planned. 27 fractions were delivered with a tandem<br />
and ring applicator, 2 fractions were delivered with tandem and<br />
ovoids. On each fraction, a CT and MRI were obtained with the<br />
applicator in place, fused, and contoured as per the GECESTRO<br />
recommendations for target delineation (HRCTV) as well as for <strong>org</strong>ans<br />
at risk (OARs). Each plan was first generated using a theABS<br />
recommended reference lines then modified as necessary with a goal<br />
to meet the GECESTRO recommendations for HRCTV D90 and OAR<br />
D2cc. The total time for the treatment plan process was also<br />
recorded.<br />
: The median time from start <strong>of</strong> imaging to treatment delivery<br />
was 3.6 hours, not including insertion time (IQR 3.3 – 3.9 hours). The<br />
median HRCTV volume was 27cc (IQR 2231cc). Among individual<br />
women, the range <strong>of</strong> HRCTV volumes (maximum – minimum) among<br />
their fractions were 37 73% <strong>of</strong> the woman’s median (<strong>10</strong>28cc<br />
absolute range). In a subset <strong>of</strong> 20 MRI images sets, the HRCTVs were<br />
recontoured in a single sitting, with a range <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong>43% <strong>of</strong> the woman’s<br />
median (511cc absolute range). The median dose to HRCTV D90 was<br />
699cGy, and among individual women, the range <strong>of</strong> HRCTV D90 doses<br />
were 413% <strong>of</strong> the woman’s median (2686cGy absolute range). The<br />
median plan called for 311.4 sec nominal, and among individual<br />
women, the range was between 337% <strong>of</strong> the woman’s median (<strong>12</strong>.6<br />
84.2 sec absolute range).<br />
: The HRCTV volumes were variable between fractions,<br />
and resulted in variability in the plans developed to meet GECESTRO<br />
dose goals. This variability was less with retrospective 'single sitting'<br />
recontouring, but was still up to 43% <strong>of</strong> the median volume in some<br />
women. We feel that this was largely due to deformation <strong>of</strong> the target<br />
due to variations in applicator placement, rather than a change in the<br />
target volume due to treatment. However, MRI based treatment<br />
planning also requires significant time and resources, which should be<br />
factored into the decision to implement for all fractions.<br />
PO267<br />
3D DOSIMETRY OF THE BLADDER FILLING IN HDR VAGINAL CUFF<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
J. Kobzda 1 , E. CikowskaWozniak 1 , M. Michalska 1 , R. Makarewicz 2<br />
1<br />
Euromedic International Oncotherapy Center in Poznan,<br />
<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> Department, Poznan, Poland<br />
2<br />
Chair and Clinic <strong>of</strong> Oncology and <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>Centre <strong>of</strong> Oncology<br />
in Bydgoszcz N.Copernicus University in Torun, <strong>Brachytherapy</strong><br />
Department, Bydgoszcz, Poland<br />
: The aim <strong>of</strong> the study was to asses the bladder<br />
doses during vaginal cuff brachytherapy, to examine the effect <strong>of</strong><br />
bladder filling on normal tissue dosimetry using computed tomography<br />
and to establish standards <strong>of</strong> treatment.<br />
: A total number <strong>of</strong> 40 women were enrolled in<br />
a prospective clinical trial. Patients were treated in the lithotomy<br />
position using single source vaginal cylinder to deliver a dose <strong>of</strong> 6 7,5<br />
Gy per fraction to one third <strong>of</strong> the vagina at a depth <strong>of</strong> 0,5cm from<br />
the cylinder surface. A total dose was 30Gy in 4 fractions when alone<br />
high dose rate brachytherapy was used or 18Gy in 3 fractions when<br />
brachytherapy was combined with external beam irradiation. The<br />
cylinders' diameters were in a range <strong>of</strong> 2,53,5 cm. Patients were<br />
asked to consume 400ml <strong>of</strong> water 40 minutes before CT scans were<br />
taken. No contrast to the bladder was given. For each patient two<br />
treatment plans in 3D Flexitron Planning System were performed: one<br />
with full bladder and the other one when the bladder was emptied.<br />
Organs at risk and CTV were contoured by one physician and checked<br />
by another. While the OAR were contoured, the following rules were<br />
preserved: the bladder and rectum were delineated as the whole<br />
<strong>org</strong>ans; all the bowels (including sigmoid) visible 2cm above the<br />
cylinder and around it on the whole length <strong>of</strong> the cylinder. The dose<br />
volume histogram for all OAR as well as the parameters recommended<br />
by GECESTRO were reported.<br />
: As the most useful values for evaluation, the following<br />
parameters were taken into account for both, full and empty bladder:<br />
mean volume, V50, V80, D0.1cc, D2cc, D2cc <strong>of</strong> the bowels (Table 1).<br />
However, the dose to the bowels is only an estimate because <strong>of</strong> their<br />
high mobility and the difficulty in defining their borders.<br />
32 patients received a lower dose to the empty bladder than to the<br />
filled <strong>org</strong>an.<br />
8 patients received a lower dose to the full bladder than to the empty<br />
one. However, in this case the difference was only 0,25 Gy in average.<br />
Additionally, it was observed that in empty state <strong>of</strong> the bladder, the<br />
bowels were receiving a higher dose (comparing to the full state) as<br />
they were located closer to the cylinder. No correlation between the<br />
diameter <strong>of</strong> the cylinder and the dose to the bladder in full or empty<br />
state was found.<br />
: The results <strong>of</strong> this paper have shown, that in most cases<br />
the dose to the empty bladder is lower than when it is full. However,<br />
in the empty state <strong>of</strong> the bladder, the bowels receive higher dose.<br />
Early and late bowel toxicity should be investigated to establish clear
S<strong>10</strong>8 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
standards <strong>of</strong> treatment. In order to control and evaluate the dose to<br />
OAR, CTbased vaginal cuff brachytherapy may be used. The outcomes<br />
confirm other studies.<br />
PO268<br />
NOVEL MRIMARKERFLANGE FOR MRIGUIDED BRACHYTHERAPY FOR<br />
GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER<br />
J. Schindel 1 , A. Eagle 2 , M. Hewitt 2 , T. Stockman 2 , M.<br />
Muruganandham 1 , C. Pigge 3 , Y. Kim 1<br />
1<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Iowa, Radiation Oncology, Iowa City, USA<br />
2<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Iowa, Electrical Computer Engineering, Iowa City, USA<br />
3<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Iowa, Chemistry, Iowa City, USA<br />
: To develop a novel MarkerFlange that can be<br />
used in titanium or plastic applicators <strong>of</strong> tandemandring or tandem<br />
andovoid and evaluate its feasibility using seven different MRI marker<br />
agents.<br />
: A novel MarkerFlange was developed in<br />
house. A 5 L phantom (Figure 1.A) was used in combination with three<br />
MarkerFlanges placed around three titanium tandems (Varian). The<br />
phantom was filled with 4L <strong>of</strong> 3% Agarose Gel (AGEL: 3g Agarose<br />
powder/ <strong>10</strong>0 mL distilled water). A total <strong>of</strong> seven different MRI<br />
marker agents were tested: Saline, Conray60 (Mallinckrodt medical),<br />
CuSO4 (1.5g/L), liquid Vitamin E, fish oil, 1% AGEL, and a cobalt<br />
chloride complex contrast (C4) (CoCl2: Glycine=4:1) which was<br />
synthesized inhouse. A high resolution (3T) MRI was used. Clinical MRI<br />
scan protocols for GYN HDR were used: T1 and T2weightedMRI<br />
(T1MRI and T2MRI) <strong>of</strong> 1 mm and 3 mm slice thickness, respectively.<br />
The signal intensities <strong>of</strong> each MarkerFlange were then compared to<br />
the signal intensity <strong>of</strong> the 3% AGEL background using ImageJ s<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />
:<br />
The MarkerFlange showed hypersignals <strong>of</strong> > 500% with CuSO4 or C4 on<br />
T1MRI and <strong>of</strong> > 400% with Saline on T2MRI. Sourcereconstruction is<br />
recommended on T1MRI—the signals <strong>of</strong> CuSO4 and C4 on T1MRI were<br />
771 ± 187% and 558 ± 197%, respectively. The effect <strong>of</strong> artifacts<br />
caused by titanium was minimal. Five agents showed signals <strong>of</strong> > <strong>10</strong>0%<br />
on T1MRI: CuSO4, C4, Vitamin E, Conray60, and fish oil. All agents<br />
but C4 showed signals <strong>of</strong> > <strong>10</strong>0% on T2MRI. The signals on T1MRI<br />
showed better geometric accuracies in cranialcaudal direction when<br />
compared to those on T2MRI that show signal blurring <strong>of</strong> 4.64 ± 1.7<br />
mm due to 3 mm slice thickness. Further studies on the geometric<br />
accuracy <strong>of</strong> MarkerFlange signals, when compared to CT datasets, are<br />
planning to be followed. When combining with the use <strong>of</strong> the<br />
applicator library, the hypersignals <strong>of</strong> the MarkerFlange are<br />
expected to improve applicatorreconstruction accuracy for MRI<br />
guided brachytherapy for gynecological cancer, especially for, but not<br />
limited to, titanium applicators.<br />
: The use <strong>of</strong> the novel MarkerFlanges for MRIguided GYN<br />
HDR brachytherapy seems feasible. The markers <strong>of</strong> CuSO4 and C4<br />
showed considerably high signals on T1MRI, as Saline did on T2MRI.<br />
However, on T1MRI CuSO4 had the highest average signal intensity<br />
throughout the flange, and C4 had the highest maximum intensity<br />
readings, so future research will be done on these two promising MRI<br />
markers. The geometrical accuracy <strong>of</strong> the MarkerFlanges with 1 mm<br />
slice thickness was also promising and seemed to minimally affected<br />
by the artifacts that can be created by the titanium applicators.<br />
PO269<br />
EXTERNAL BEAM RADIOTHERAPY AND BRAQUITHERAPY ASSOCIATED<br />
CHEMOTHERAPY,IN IIBIV CANCER OF THE CERVIX<br />
Z. Mercedes 1 , I. Tovar 1 , J.A. Bullejos 2 , R. Guerrero 1 , P. Vargas 1 , M.A.<br />
Gentil 1 , I. Linares 1 , M. Martínez 1 , P. Expósito 1 , R. Del Moral 1<br />
1<br />
Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Radiotherapy Oncology,<br />
Granada, Spain<br />
2<br />
Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Medical phisics, Granada,<br />
Spain<br />
: Introduction: External beam radiotherapy (EBRT)<br />
and braquitherapy (BQT) associated with chemotherapy (CT) are<br />
standard treatment in cancer <strong>of</strong> the cervix.<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> HDR BQT has allowed the optimization <strong>of</strong> dosimetry and its<br />
application outpatient basis.<br />
Objectives: To analyze the clinical results <strong>of</strong> our study and evaluate<br />
the toxicity <strong>of</strong> this treatment.<br />
: From <strong>May</strong> 2005 to <strong>May</strong> 2011 were treated in<br />
our center fortyseven patients with a mean age <strong>of</strong> 51 years (3770)<br />
with this disease by chemoradiotherapy (45 50.4 Gy) plus HDR BQT<br />
overprint probe uterine central. Each patient received 4 or 5<br />
applications <strong>of</strong> BQT HDR.<br />
Tumor stage: 1E1, 2 E IIA, 34 IBD B, 3E III B, 3 EIIIC, and 4E IV. The<br />
maximum average diameter <strong>of</strong> the tumor is 5.7 cm<br />
We need a description <strong>of</strong> the GTV (gross target volume) and CTV<br />
(clinical target volume) prior to each treatment modification. The<br />
effective biological dose in GTV and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk, rectum and<br />
bladder was 67.32 Gy and 75.63 half 76.97 Gy respectively.<br />
: With a median follow more 2years we get a 81.8% pelvic<br />
control and overall survival <strong>of</strong> 99%. The toxicity was observed:<br />
Acute:18% proctitis, 27% cystitis and late: 9% stenosis vaginal.<br />
: Concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by BQT HDR is<br />
feasible and effective treatment for patients with advanced cervical<br />
cancer. It allows complete coverage <strong>of</strong> the GTV and CTV which is<br />
crucial for local control.<br />
PO270<br />
COMPARING CLASSIC AND MULTICHANNEL CYLINDRICAL VAGINAL<br />
APPLICATORS IN INTRACAVITARY GYNAECOLOGIC BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
A. Cerrotta 1 , M. Carrara 2 , M. Borroni 2 , C. Tenconi 3 , E. Pignoli 2 , C.<br />
Fallai 1<br />
1<br />
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Radiotherapy 2, Milan,<br />
Italy<br />
2<br />
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Medical Physics, Milan,<br />
Italy<br />
3<br />
Uiversità degli Studi di Milano, Physics, Milan, Italy<br />
: To compare dose distributions obtained by means<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 'classical' cylindrical and the multichannel vaginal applicator in<br />
intracavitary gynaecologic brachytherapy treatments.<br />
: Eight patients with primary or recurrent<br />
vaginal cancer were treated at the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto<br />
Nazionale dei Tumori with high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BRT).<br />
The prescribed BRT doses to the target were <strong>of</strong> 2000cGy (BRT as<br />
boost) and 3500cGy or 4200cGy (exclusive BRT), which were delivered<br />
in fractions <strong>of</strong> 500cGy or 600cGy, respectively. Out <strong>of</strong> 37 treatment<br />
fractions, a total <strong>of</strong> 24 were performed by means <strong>of</strong> a 'homemade'<br />
multichannel vaginal intracavitary applicator which contains a central<br />
catheter and five or six lateral tubes that are equally spaced around<br />
the surface <strong>of</strong> the cylinder. Retrospectively, a theoretical BRT<br />
treatment was planned on the same images adopting only the central<br />
catheter, simulating the use <strong>of</strong> the 'classical' cylindrical vaginal<br />
applicator which is commonly recommended as the standard<br />
applicator for vaginal treatments. Dosimetric distributions were<br />
obtained fulfilling for each single fraction the constrains <strong>of</strong> V2cc
S1<strong>10</strong> <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
PO273<br />
DETERMINING DOSIMETRIC FACTORS RELATED TO LOCAL CONTROL IN<br />
CTBASED BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
S. Kaplan 1 , K. Townamchai 1 , C. Newhouse 1 , A. Viswanathan 1<br />
1 Brigham and Women's Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Boston MA, USA<br />
: To determine the relationship between local<br />
recurrence (LR) and dosimetric values for cervicalcancer patients<br />
treated using CTguided, highdoserate brachytherapy.<br />
: A total <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>4 patients were treated for<br />
cervical masses using CTplanned brachytherapy between 4/2004 and<br />
3/2011. Of these, 5 patients with primaries that were noncervical or<br />
<strong>of</strong> unclear origin and 4 with Stage IV disease at diagnosis were<br />
excluded.<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 595 fractions were analyzed. Each patient had a median <strong>of</strong><br />
5 fractions (range [rg] 3 – <strong>10</strong>). Median perfraction prescription (Rx)<br />
dose was 5.5 Gy (rg 39). Twentytwo patients were treated with a<br />
tandem and ovoid applicator, 36 tandem and ring, 6 tandem and<br />
cylinder, 16 interstitial +/ tandem, and 35 with a combination.<br />
KaplanMeier progressionfree (PFS), diseasespecific (DSS) and overall<br />
(OS) survival estimates were calculated. To analyze dosimetric<br />
relationships, median average point A, median D90, and median Rx<br />
dose per patient were used to calculate several ratios: Rx/Point A,<br />
Rx/D90, and D90/Point A. Mean ratios were compared using 2tailed<br />
Ttests.<br />
: Stages were IA (n=2; 1.7%), IB (n=25; 21.7%), IIA (n=24;<br />
20.9%), IIB (n=49; 42.6%), IIIA (n=2; 1.7%), IIIB (n=11; 9.6%) and IVA<br />
(n=2; 1.7%). Staging for interstitial patients was: IB (1), IIA (2), IIB (5),<br />
IIIA (2), IIIB (4) and IVA (2).<br />
Median total external beam (EB) cervical dose in EQD2 was 44.3 Gy (rg<br />
42.560.3). Median cumulative Rx brachytherapy dose was 42.6 Gy (rg<br />
25.675). Median combined EB + brachytherapy dose was 86.9 Gy (rg<br />
67.3<strong>10</strong>2.9). Median cumulative CTD90 in EQD2 was 81.8 Gy (rg 38.3<br />
114.7). Median cumulative doses to 0.1cc (D0.1cc) and 2cc (D2cc)<br />
were 88.5 Gy3 and 72.8 Gy3 for the bladder, 75.1 Gy3 and 63.0 for<br />
rectum and 74.8 Gy3 and 63.1 Gy3 for sigmoid.<br />
Median followup time was 21.8 months. The 2year LR rate was 6.9%<br />
overall, 4.0% for the 99 noninterstitial patients and 18.8% for the 16<br />
patients treated with interstitial alone. For all patients, 2year PFS<br />
was 79%, DSS was 83% and OS was 78%.<br />
As seen in the table, the Rx/point A and D90/Point A ratios were<br />
significantly lower for patients with LR than for all others. This<br />
implies that patients who relapsed had larger tumors with the Rx dose<br />
close to Point A, and that Point A is a good approximation for tumor<br />
dose. CT is most beneficial for optimizing the normaltissue doses.<br />
LR Not LR P value<br />
Rx/Point A MR=1.002; n=9 MR=1.140; n=<strong>10</strong>1 0.001*<br />
(rg 0.891.15) (rg 0.76–2.11)<br />
Rx /D90 MR=1.024; n=8 MR=1.016; n=84 0.882<br />
(rg 0.91 1.28) (rg 0.672.36)<br />
D90 / Point A MR=1.020; n=7 MR=1.214; n=80 0.004*<br />
(rg 0.89 1.25) (rg 0.672.72)<br />
*MR=mean ratio<br />
: Dosimetric ratios incorporating point A may be useful<br />
metrics for clinics attempting to transition from plain film to CT<br />
and/or for those seeking a metric to determine adequate dosing to<br />
the CTCTV.<br />
PO274<br />
DOSIMETRIC IMPACT OF CTS WITH EACH FRACTION ON ORGANS AT RISK<br />
FOR HDR VAGINAL CYLINDER BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
L. Zhu 1 , O. Craciunescu 2 , J. Cai 2 , B. Steffey 2 , J. Adamson 2 , J. Chino 2<br />
1 Peking University Third Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Beijing, China<br />
2 Duke University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Durham, USA<br />
: To investigate the relevance <strong>of</strong> CTbased<br />
planning with every fraction versus first fraction CTbased planning on<br />
<strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OARs) for highdose rate vaginal cylinder brachytherapy<br />
(HDR VBT).<br />
: Fifty patients (201 fractions) who underwent<br />
HDR VBT for postoperative endometrial or cervical cancer were<br />
retrospectively analyzed in the study. CTbased 3D planning was<br />
performed at each fraction with prescription dose <strong>of</strong> 400700 cGy<br />
prescribed to 0.5 cm from the cylinder surface and for a treatment<br />
length <strong>of</strong> 46 cm. Two crude dose summation plans were made for<br />
each patient: (1) by multiplying the number <strong>of</strong> fractions and the<br />
treatment plan metrics <strong>of</strong> the first fraction (Sum1), and (2) by<br />
summing treatment plan metrics <strong>of</strong> all fractions (Sum2). D0.1cc, D2cc,<br />
and D<strong>10</strong>cc <strong>of</strong> bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and small bowel were<br />
collected and compared between Sum1 and Sum2. All data were also<br />
converted to equivalent dose at 2Gy per fraction (EQD2) for<br />
comparison. For 18 patients who had urinary catheterization in all<br />
fractions, ICRU 38 bladder and rectum points were also defined<br />
(PDICRU, B, PDICRU, R) and compared between Sum1 and Sum2. All<br />
statistical analyses were performed using paired t test.<br />
: For bladder and small bowel, the means <strong>of</strong> Sum1 were<br />
significantly greater than those <strong>of</strong> Sum2 (p
S1<strong>12</strong> <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
: Radical and salvage radiotherapy with brachytherapy<br />
achieves an acceptable locoregional control rates in patients with<br />
localized / locally advanced vulval cancers.<br />
PO279<br />
RADIOTHERAPY AND MULTIMODALITY TREATMENT FOR PATIENTS WITH<br />
LOCALLY ADVANCED UTERINE CERVIX CANCER<br />
T. Litvinova 1 , I. Kosenko 1 , O. Matylevich 1 , L. Furmanchuk 1 , G.<br />
Kostevich 1<br />
1<br />
N.N.Alexandrov National Cancer Center <strong>of</strong> Belarus, Department<br />
Gynaecological Surgery, Minsk, Belarus<br />
: Comparing the outcomes <strong>of</strong> multimodality<br />
treatment and radiotherapy in LAUCC patients.<br />
: The study enrolled 88 LAUCC patients. In<br />
group 1 (36 women) the treatment started with multidrug<br />
chemotherapy (MDCT) courses <strong>of</strong> cisplatin, gemcitabine or<br />
doxorubicin. The patients presenting resectable tumours (41.7%) were<br />
administered a brachytherapy (BT) treatment at a dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> Gy and<br />
type III hysterectomy or pelvic exenteration, the rest <strong>of</strong> the patients<br />
received combination radiotherapy (CRT). Group 2 (52 women) were<br />
treated with splitcourse CRT and cisplatin. The treatment started<br />
with externalbeam radiotherapy (EBRT) at a dose <strong>of</strong> 30 Gy. After an<br />
interval, 32 patients received BT at point A 5 Gy twice a week up to<br />
30 Gy and EBRT up to 20 Gy. The remaining 20 patients, also after an<br />
interval, continued the treatment with only EBRT up to a total dose <strong>of</strong><br />
20 Gy. The basic characteristics <strong>of</strong> patients in the both groups were<br />
comparable.<br />
: In group 1, 80% <strong>of</strong> the patients underwent radical surgery,<br />
and 20% received nonradical surgical treatment. Postoperative<br />
morbidity rate was 6.7%. In the course <strong>of</strong> 3year followup, only 2<br />
(13.3%) patients developed relapses. Observed overall survival (OOS)<br />
was 0.90±0.09, recurrencefree survival (RFS) was 0.89±0.1,<br />
metastasisfree survival (MFS) was 1.0. Among the patients<br />
administered MDCT and CRT, recurrence occurred in 1 (4.8%) patient,<br />
and metastases in 6 (28.6%). Threeyear OOS was 0.26±0.02, RFS was<br />
0.99±0.07, MFS was 0.39±0.18.<br />
In group 2, <strong>of</strong> 32 patients treated with CRT, <strong>10</strong> (31.3%) presented with<br />
uncured tumour, and <strong>of</strong> the remaining 20 patients, such cases<br />
amounted to 15 (75%), the number <strong>of</strong> women with relapses and<br />
metastases among them exceeding by 43.7%. Threeyear OOS was<br />
0.62±0.09 and 0.30±0.1, RFS was 0.90±0.06 and 0.74±0.1, MFS was<br />
0.70±0.08 and 0.63±0.1 respectively.<br />
: CRT for LAUCC patients, being a stardard treatment in<br />
Belarus, produces high rates <strong>of</strong> OOS, RFS and MFS, compared to EBRT<br />
alone without BT.<br />
The novel multimodality technique is more beneficial than CRT but it<br />
can be performed only in 41.7% <strong>of</strong> LAUCC patients.<br />
PO280<br />
PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF DOSE SUM OF PELVIC TOMOTHERAPY<br />
AND HDR BRACHYTHERAPY TREATMENT FOR CERVICAL CANCER<br />
S. Garelli 1 , S. Agostinelli 1 , A. Bellini 1 , F. Giannelli 2 , D. Doino 2 , S.<br />
Barra 2 , G. Taccini 1<br />
1<br />
IRCCS AOU San Martino IST, U.O.C. Fisica Medica, Genova, Italy<br />
2<br />
IRCCS AOU San Martino IST, U.O.S. Radioterapia Infantile e<br />
Tecniche Speciali, Genova, Italy<br />
: To evaluate the feasibility <strong>of</strong> dose summation <strong>of</strong><br />
tomotherapy whole pelvic irradiation (TWPI) with simultaneously<br />
integrated boost (SIB) and the high dose rate (HDR) intracavitary<br />
brachytherapy boost treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer.<br />
: Three patients with FIGO IIIIIIVA uterine<br />
cervix cancer received concurrent chemoradiation with pelvic helical<br />
tomotherapy (HiArt) irradiation including SIB to parametrium and<br />
involvedatdiagnosis lymph nodes followed by HDR intracavitary<br />
brachytherapy boost. TWPI dose was 45 Gy delivered in 25 fractions<br />
with a 57.50/53.7 Gy SIB, while the sequential HDR intracavitary (3<br />
channels Fletcher) brachytherapy boost dose was 2430 Gy/45<br />
fractions twice a week. For external radiotherapy, delineation <strong>of</strong><br />
target volumes was made according to ICRU Report 50 and 62. The<br />
ORs bladder, rectum, intestine and femoral heads were contoured.<br />
For brachytherapy all patients at every treatment session underwent a<br />
MR or a CT scan. HR and IR CTVs were delineated according to the<br />
Recommendations from GYN GECESTRO Working Group and ORs<br />
bladder, rectum and intestine were contoured in the CT scan. Given<br />
that the CTVs and ORs are displaced during the brachytherapy<br />
treatment because <strong>of</strong> the insertion <strong>of</strong> the intracavitary applicator the<br />
image fusion, and hence the dose summation, <strong>of</strong> the external<br />
tomotherapy plan with the brachytherapy plan is not trivial. We<br />
evaluated the feasibility <strong>of</strong> image fusion/dose summation <strong>of</strong> the two<br />
plans using MIM v.5.2 (MIM s<strong>of</strong>tware inc.) by looking how well the<br />
fused structures contoured on the brachytherapy plan matched with<br />
the ones contoured on the TWPI plan.<br />
: In the examined cases we tested the available MIM rigid<br />
image fusion tools (rigidassisted, boxbased, contourbased and<br />
pointbased) and found that no rigid fusion tool can provide an<br />
acceptable fusion. On the other hand the deformed image fusion<br />
provided improved and consistent results with overall good<br />
correspondence <strong>of</strong> the fused CTV and bladder volumes, while the<br />
match <strong>of</strong> the rectum volume was only fair. Deformed brachytherapy<br />
dose distribution was in general reasonable, but we noticed<br />
unacceptable strong distortion at the level <strong>of</strong> the cranial periphery <strong>of</strong><br />
the brachytherapy plan.<br />
: In our preliminary investigation we found that the<br />
deformed CTCT image fusion implemented in MIM 5.2 s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />
provides a powerful tool to experiment dose summation <strong>of</strong> external<br />
beam and brachytherapy treatments. While the resulting deformed<br />
image and dose distribution seem 'reasonable', strong distortion <strong>of</strong><br />
certain areas can be present. In conclusion we can say that MIM’s<br />
deformed fusion proved to be a good starting point, but we think that<br />
for this demanding task the deformed fusion tool should be further<br />
improved maybe adding userdriven or pointbased deformation<br />
guidance. In progress the improvement <strong>of</strong> patients number to obtain<br />
also a quantitative analysis.<br />
PO281<br />
THE EFFECT OF BODY MASS INDEX ON MAXIMUM RECTAL DOSE IN HIGH<br />
DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CERVICAL CANCER<br />
J. Lim 1 , B. Durbin Johnson 2 , R. Valicenti 1 , R. Stern 1 , M. Mathai 1 , J.<br />
<strong>May</strong>adev 1<br />
1 University California Davis, Radiation Oncology, Sacramento, USA<br />
2 University California Davis, Biostatistics, Sacramento, USA<br />
: The impact <strong>of</strong> body mass index (BMI) on rectal<br />
dose delivered in high dose rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer is<br />
unknown. We investigated the role <strong>of</strong> BMI in volumetric rectal dose<br />
delivery during 3D CT based planning for locally advanced cervical<br />
cancer.<br />
: Between 2007 and 20<strong>10</strong>, there were 51<br />
patients treated with high dose rate brachytherapy for locally<br />
advanced cervical cancer. A retrospective chart review was conducted<br />
using the electronic medical record to determine the patients’ BMI. 97<br />
brachytherapy treatment planning CT scans from 51 patients with<br />
locally advanced cervical cancer were reviewed. The rectum was<br />
manually contoured from the ischial tuberosity to the pubic<br />
symphysis. Using the treatment planning s<strong>of</strong>tware, a volumetric<br />
measurement <strong>of</strong> the maximum, mean, dose to 2cc, dose to 1cc <strong>of</strong> the<br />
rectum was calculated. The ICRU rectal point was recorded, and a<br />
dose volume histogram was referenced. Linear mixed effect models<br />
were used to determine the effect <strong>of</strong> BMI, tandem angle, and other<br />
factors on dose while adjusting for the presence <strong>of</strong> multiple<br />
observations per patient.<br />
: The average BMI (kg/m2) was 28.5 with a range <strong>of</strong> 17.247.6.<br />
Of the study population, 6% were morbidly obese, 28% were obese,<br />
28% were overweight, 36% were normal weight and 2% were<br />
underweight. The mean D1cc, D2cc, mean rectal dose (%), and<br />
maximum rectal dose (%), and ICRU rectum was 304Gy, 278 Gy, 60%,<br />
and 20%, respectively. In multivariate analysis controlling for tandem<br />
angle, surface area, and maximum distension, there was a significant<br />
decrease in the D1cc rectal dose, p = 0.017, and D2cc rectal dose,<br />
p=0.016, ICRU rectal point dose, p=0.022, and mean rectal dose<br />
percentage, p=0.021 with an increase in BMI.<br />
: Obesity decreases the rectal dose given in high dose rate<br />
brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. The increase in<br />
fatty tissue in the retrouterine space may possibly contribute to<br />
sparing <strong>of</strong> rectal dose.<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 113<br />
PO282<br />
RADIOCHEMOTHERAPY AND HDR BOOST IN CERVICAL CANCER:<br />
ANALYSIS ON TOXICITY, A <strong>10</strong> YEARS SINGLE INSITUTION EXPERIENCE<br />
A. Colombo 1 , R. D'Amico 1 , C. Frigerio 2 , S. Sacco 1 , G. Sangalli 2 , F.<br />
Declich 2 , F. Placa 1<br />
1 A.O. della Provincia di Lecco, S.C. Radioterapia, Lecco, Italy<br />
2 A.O. della Provincia di Lecco, Fisica Sanitaria, Lecco, Italy<br />
: To evaluate the data <strong>of</strong> toxicity and relapses in<br />
patients with cervical cancer treated by a definitive regimen <strong>of</strong><br />
radiotherapy ± chemotherapy + high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR<br />
BRT) boost.<br />
: Patients affected by cervical cancer, every<br />
histotype and every stage, according to the results <strong>of</strong> multiple<br />
randomized clinical trials, were treated by a radiotherapy schedule,<br />
with or without chemotherapy, according to stage, age, and<br />
performance status <strong>of</strong> the patient. All patients were addressed to a<br />
HDR BRT boost.After the treatment the patients were followed by a<br />
clinical examination every six months, and an imaging evaluation (MRI<br />
or PETTC) every six months for the first two years.<br />
: Between 01/07/2000 and 30/06/20<strong>10</strong> 190 patients affected<br />
by cervical cancer (different hitotypes) were treated in our<br />
institution.40 were classified stage Ib1IIA1, 68 were stage IB2IIA2, 38<br />
were stage IIb, 35 were stage III, 9 were stage IVA. Pelvic limphnodes<br />
were positive in 56 patients (29.4%), and lomboaortic limphnodes (±<br />
pelvic nodes) were positive in 19 patients (<strong>10</strong>%).The median follow up<br />
was 29 months (range 1136.5).The schedule included a wholepelvic<br />
external beam radiotherapy <strong>of</strong> 45 Gy in 25 fractions with parametrial<br />
boost (when parametrial or sidewall disease and/or pelvic<br />
lymphadenopathy present) <strong>of</strong> 9 Gy and a HDR BRT boost, dose 2131<br />
Gy in 36 fractions, delivered to PTV. Every single BRT fraction was<br />
plannified by CT. A chemotherapy regimen <strong>of</strong> weekly cisplatin<br />
(40mg/mq) was used, according to disease stage and patient<br />
PS.Outcome measures included the toxicity (CTCAE 3.0), disease free<br />
survival (DFS) and local control.The gastrointestinal G2 toxicity was<br />
observed in 6.3% <strong>of</strong> patients and the G3 GI toxicity was observed in<br />
1%. We observed 1 case <strong>of</strong> G4 GI toxicity (0.5%).We found a<br />
relationship between EQD2 <strong>of</strong> 77Gy to 2cc <strong>of</strong> rectum and GI≥2<br />
(p=0.043) (fig.1).<br />
The genitourinary G2 toxicity was observed in 3.1 % and the G3 GU<br />
toxicity was observed in 1%. No G4 GU toxicity was reported.We<br />
reported one case <strong>of</strong> cutaneous toxicity and one case <strong>of</strong> G4<br />
neurological toxicity.The overall survival was 61% (116/190). The<br />
diseasefree survival was 64% (<strong>12</strong>1/190). The local control was 84.7%<br />
(161/190).The mean time to local recurrence was 38 months (range 1<br />
135 months). The mean time to distant recurrence was 36 months<br />
(range 2135 months).<br />
: The radiochemotherapy and BRT schedule as a definitive<br />
treatment is widely used for cervical cancer. The results in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
toxicity and DFS are comparable with the results <strong>of</strong> the literature; in<br />
clinical practise we adopted the limit <strong>of</strong> D2cc to rectum ≤ 77Gy.A<br />
detailed analysis must be done about the relationship between the<br />
sites <strong>of</strong> recurrence and the delivered dose, considering for the future<br />
BRT dose escalations, using Image Guided Adaptive BRT (IGABT).<br />
PO283<br />
NEOADJUVANT OR ADJUVANT BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CORPUS UTERI<br />
CANCER PATIENTS AT LOW RISK<br />
S. Mavrichev 1 , V. Suslova 2 , I. Kosenko 1<br />
1<br />
N.N.Alexandrov National Cancer Center <strong>of</strong> Belarus, Department<br />
Gynaecological Surgery, Minsk, Belarus<br />
2<br />
N.N.Alexandrov National Cancer Center <strong>of</strong> Belarus, Department<br />
Radiotherapy/<strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Minsk, Belarus<br />
: Evaluating the efficacy <strong>of</strong> neoadjuvant and<br />
adjuvant brachytherapy (BT) for stage I corpus uteri cancer (CUC)<br />
patients at low risk.<br />
: In 2011 our Centre started a prospective<br />
randomized study to evaluate the efficacy <strong>of</strong> neoadjuvant (group A)<br />
and adjuvant BT (group B) for stage I CUC patients at low risk. All the<br />
patients underwent surgical intervention: hysterectomy with bilateral<br />
salpingooophorectomy. Sixtyfour patients were administered the<br />
treatment; 27 in group A and 37 in group B.<br />
Neoadjuvant BT consisted <strong>of</strong> one traction at a single target dose <strong>of</strong><br />
13.5 Gy using Rotte Endometrial Applicator. The dose was delivered to<br />
the middle <strong>of</strong> endometrium. The application was performed the day<br />
before or on the operation day. For adjuvant BT, singlechannel<br />
colpostat was used. The dose <strong>of</strong> 8.5 Gy was delivered to the depth <strong>of</strong><br />
5 mm from vaginal mucosa. A total <strong>of</strong> two fractions was delivered<br />
with 7day interval, the total target dose being 17 Gy. The patients <strong>of</strong><br />
the both groups were treated at high dose rate on microSelectron<br />
HDR.<br />
: All the 64 patients received the prescribed treatment. One to<br />
<strong>12</strong> months followup found no severe radiation morbidity in vaginal<br />
mucosa. The vaginal stump healed by first intention.<br />
: Further accumulation <strong>of</strong> clinical material and followup<br />
<strong>of</strong> the patients are needed to evaluate early and late radiation<br />
toxicity caused by the two BT techniques.<br />
PO284<br />
OUR EXPERIENCE IN INITIAL 20 CASES OF CERVICAL CANCER WITH CT<br />
IMAGE BASED BRACHYTHERAPY TREATMENTS<br />
L. Carvalho 1 , A. Pereira 2 , R. Pirraco 2 , T. Viterbo 2 , M. Gomes 2 , L.<br />
Salgado 1 , L. Trigo 1 , J. Lencart 2<br />
1<br />
Instituto Português de Oncologia, Serviço Braquiterapia, Porto,<br />
Portugal<br />
2<br />
Instituto Português de Oncologia, Serviço Fisica, Porto, Portugal<br />
: Our institution has a big experience in the<br />
treatment <strong>of</strong> cervical cancer, since the early 70´s, with<br />
brachytherapy as major component <strong>of</strong> the treatment plan. We began<br />
with radio implants, with hand calculations and in the 80’s we moved<br />
to cesium tubes, and then moved to cesium pelets using a Selectron<br />
137Cs, with treatment planning system calculations based in<br />
orthogonal images. Since 2003, we began to use a MicroSelectron<br />
Pulse Dose Rate (PDR), with the same type treatment planning.<br />
In 2011, we started CT based planning with CTMR compatible utero<br />
vaginal applicators. Dose prescription guidelines, dose points<br />
prescription and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk dose (OAR’s) derived from the<br />
Manchester System are described in the ICRU Report Nº38. Although<br />
this method has provided a large clinical experience, it presents big<br />
limitations that have been well documented. The implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
3D imagebased treatment planning systems, with target and OAR’s<br />
volumes delineation allows a better understanding <strong>of</strong> the tumour<br />
spatial configuration and provides a better target coverage and OAR’s<br />
dose evaluation. In this study we analyse our initial 20 cases <strong>of</strong><br />
cervical cancer brachytherapy treatments with 192Ir PDR using a CT<br />
image based planning, and the changes we felt it introduced in our<br />
technique, in terms <strong>of</strong> prescription points and OAR´s dose constraints.<br />
: 20 patients were treated with pelvic 3DC<br />
external irradiation, followed by a brachytherapy boost. Patients were<br />
treated with MicroSelectron V2 or with Flexitron PDR, and all plans<br />
were CT imagebased, using Oncentra Masterplan 4.1. All patients had<br />
a bladder catheter inserted, with the balloon filled with contrast, and<br />
a rectum catheter, containing a radiopaque marker. Target volume,<br />
rectum, rectal catheter, bladder wall and bladder balloon were<br />
delineated. The normal Manchester A points prescription was<br />
modified, following the coverage <strong>of</strong> target volume. Plans were
S114 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
analysed by DVH. The 0.1cc dose for bladder balloon, rectum<br />
catheter, bladder and rectum were calculated and compared.<br />
: The prescription dose points were changed in 40% <strong>of</strong> cases<br />
from the Manchester system to modified dose prescription points. The<br />
width <strong>of</strong> the <strong>10</strong>0% isodose at the level <strong>of</strong> classical point A varied<br />
between 1.6 and 2cm. The OAR´s 0.1cc dose was higher in the CT<br />
imagebased plans when compared with maximum dose points in the<br />
orthogonal image based plans, with the mean variations for bladder <strong>of</strong><br />
+26% (0 – 66) and rectum <strong>of</strong> +20% (0 – 37), respectively.<br />
: When gynaecological brachytherapy applications are<br />
performed using CT imagebased planning, the prescription dose may<br />
change and surrounding tissues are better spared. The physicians have<br />
a clear vision <strong>of</strong> what it is the real target volume and isodose<br />
distributions may be conformed to that target. The OAR’s doses are<br />
well known and the DVH analysis allows us to compare results, and<br />
also analyse other volumes <strong>of</strong> interest as D1cc and D2cc for rectum<br />
and bladder.<br />
PO285<br />
3D COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY GUIDED IMAGE BASED INTERSTITIAL<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CANCER OF CERVIX<br />
S. Sharma 1 , S. Rishi Kartik 1 , R.C. Alva 1 , P. Deka 1<br />
1 Manipal Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Bangalore, India<br />
: To evaluate the local control and toxicities in<br />
patients with locally advanced cancer <strong>of</strong> cervix undergoing interstitial<br />
brachytherapy planned with computed tomography (CT) imaging.<br />
: Between January 2008 and December 20<strong>10</strong>,<br />
29 consecutive clinically staged patients <strong>of</strong> carcinoma <strong>of</strong> cervix FIGO<br />
stages IBIIIB treated at our institution with curative radiation were<br />
analysed. None <strong>of</strong> the patients underwent Magnetic Resonance<br />
imaging as part <strong>of</strong> work up. All the patients received 45 Gy in 25<br />
fractions <strong>of</strong> whole pelvic external beam radiation planned by 3DCRT<br />
concurrent with weekly Cisplatinum 40mg/m 2 . A week later, patients<br />
underwent interstitial brachytherapy using Syed Neblett Gyn 3<br />
perineal template combined with intrauterine tandem insertion and<br />
two fractions <strong>of</strong> 6.5 Gy each were delivered by high dose rate<br />
brachytherapy system. The same was repeated after another week.<br />
CT scans were obtained after each application with 50 ml <strong>of</strong> dilute<br />
contrast injected into bladder and 20 ml into rectum. The outer<br />
boundary <strong>of</strong> the needles was used to define clinical target volume<br />
(CTV). The first application and CTV delineation was done according<br />
to the disease extent at diagnosis. Second application and the CTV<br />
delineation covered the disease extent present at the time <strong>of</strong><br />
brachytherapy. Thus the second CTV received 4 fractions <strong>of</strong> 6.5 Gy<br />
each (EqD2 = 80.1Gy). Rectum, bladder and sigmoid were contoured<br />
according to GECESTRO guidelines. Employing dose volume<br />
adaptation, dose to 2cc <strong>of</strong> bladder, rectum and sigmoid was restricted<br />
to 5, 4 and 4 Gy respectively ( EqD2 = 69.5, 63 and 63 Gy<br />
respectively). Although every effort was made to ensure that at least<br />
90% <strong>of</strong> CTV received the prescription dose, OAR constraints were<br />
strictly respected, even if that resulted in inferior CTV coverage.<br />
Clinical outcomes evaluated were locoregional disease control and<br />
toxicity.<br />
: The median age <strong>of</strong> this patient population was 54 (range 25 <br />
72) years. All 29 had squamous cell carcinoma histology. Stage<br />
distribution : IB2 3, IIA – 3, IIB –13 and IIIB –11. At a median followup<br />
<strong>of</strong> 19 (range 642) months, 28 (96.5%) patients had locoregional<br />
disease control as assessed by clinical examination. One patient each<br />
developed lung metastasis and second malignancy (breast cancer) at<br />
17 and 14 months respectively but were locoregionally controlled.<br />
Three (<strong>10</strong>.6%) patients developed RTOG grade I rectal toxicity. No<br />
patient reported bladder or sigmoid toxicity. Grade III late vaginal<br />
effects occurred in all patients and grade III in 4 (13.8%).<br />
: CT based interstitial brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> cervical cancer is<br />
feasible and results in excellent clinical outcomes providing very high<br />
locoregional control <strong>of</strong> disease with very low rates <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />
related toxicity.<br />
PO286<br />
ASSESSMENT OF "OLD FASHION" GYNAECOLOGIC HIGHDOSERATE<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY STARTING POINT TO MODERN BT TECHNIQUES<br />
A. Vasconcelos 1 , M. Ferreira 1 , V. Mendonça 1 , M. J<strong>org</strong>e 1 , I. Monteiro<br />
Grillo 1<br />
1 Hospital Santa Maria, Radiation Oncology, Lisboa, Portugal<br />
: Carcinoma <strong>of</strong> the uterine cervix is the second<br />
most common cancer and the third leading cause <strong>of</strong> cancer death<br />
among women. For some decades combination <strong>of</strong> external beam<br />
radiotherapy (EBRT) and intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) has<br />
become a Radiotherapy standard treatment modality for cervix<br />
cancer. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is to assess dosimetry plan outcomes<br />
with highdoserate (HDR) ICBT planning orthogonal radiographs. For<br />
pts with cervix cancer throughout treatment prescription to standard<br />
Point A dose in the Manchester system.<br />
: Between December 2001 to November 2009,<br />
<strong>10</strong>6 pts with cervix cancer, were treated with EBRT and concomitant<br />
Chemotherapy + ICBT. Pts staged with FIGO staging system (6th ed.<br />
2002). Authors report a retrospective analysis <strong>of</strong> 94 patients (pts), <strong>12</strong><br />
pts did not complete ICBT. Pts presented stage IB in 11%, 14% for<br />
stage IIA, 66% for stage IIB and <strong>10</strong>% for stage IIIB disease. Initially<br />
treated with EBRT dose (box technique) between 41,450,4 Gy<br />
(1,8Gy/fx) with concomitant weekly CT (cisplatin 40 mg/m 2 ). Dose<br />
escalation was obtain with HDR ICBT prescription to point A 24Gy<br />
(6Gy/fx) within 34 weeks (EQD2=32Gy). With Intracavitary Rotte 'Y'<br />
applicators technique. Dosimetry study was performed with<br />
orthogonal radiographs and PLATO ® planning system. Local recurrence<br />
and two year disease free survival (Kaplan Meier model) were<br />
determinate. Major acute and late toxicity was evaluated with<br />
EORTCCTC.<br />
: Within this group <strong>of</strong> 94 pts, median age was 54 yearsold<br />
(range 2984). Cervix lesions size had median diameter 40 mm (range<br />
<strong>10</strong>80). Lesion was localized in 77% pts in exocervix, 17% pts in<br />
endocervix and 2 pts with both involved. Pathology determined 81%<br />
squamous cell carcinoma and 18% adenocarcinoma. Applicators with<br />
median tandem length <strong>of</strong> 7 cm (range 48cm) and median vaginal<br />
ovoids diameter 25mm (range 1530 cm). Dose variations observed in<br />
rectum median Dmax. 315cGy (range 155509) and bladder median<br />
Dmax. 418cGy (range 234531). Median total treatment time was <strong>10</strong><br />
weeks (range 320). With a median followup 45 months (range 7–98),<br />
4 pts had local recurrence and 14% distant metastasis. The twoyear<br />
disease free survival was 81%; 3 pts with acute grade 3/4 toxicity;<br />
Late toxicity: 9 pts with grade 3/4 gastrointestinal and 8 pts with<br />
grade 3/4 genitourinary toxicity (Dmax rectum 297486cGy and<br />
bladder 367460cGy).<br />
: Single point dose estimation using the reference point<br />
on orthogonal radiographs will underestimate the maximum bladder<br />
and rectum dose. However 3D entire intracavitary evaluation,<br />
underdosage regions can be recognized and optimize. These outcomes<br />
will endorse new era in ICBT, with CT imaging and dosimetric<br />
planning, following GECESTRO guidelines. Since individualized HDR<br />
ICBT treatment is recommended for all clinical stages <strong>of</strong> cervix<br />
cancer.<br />
PO287<br />
VOLUME RELATED HRCTV COVERAGE USING MRI BASED OPTIMISED<br />
TREATMENT PLANS FOR HDR BRACHYTHERAPY CERVIX TREATMENTS<br />
S. Aldridge 1 , M. Naeem 1 , N. Bozic 1 , A. Winship 2<br />
1<br />
Guy's and St.Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Medical Physics, London, United Kingdom<br />
2<br />
Guy's and St.Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Clinical Oncology, London, United Kingdom<br />
: Intracavitary brachytherapy (BT) plays a crucial<br />
role in the therapeutic management <strong>of</strong> patients with locally advanced<br />
cervical carcinoma. MRI is the gold standard for target and <strong>org</strong>an at<br />
risk (OAR) delineation for BT cervix treatments enabling the dose<br />
distribution to be conformed to the target for individual patients. We<br />
implemented MRI based 3D treatment planning for HDR BT cervix<br />
treatments following the GYN GECESTRO recommendations in <strong>May</strong><br />
20<strong>10</strong> and have now treated 25 patients. This work assesses the ability<br />
to cover the HRCTV with respect to volume size without exceeding<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 115<br />
the critical structure doses by using plan optimisation without<br />
interstitial needles.<br />
: Each patient received 3 individual applicator<br />
insertions. MR and CT scans were acquired for every BT fraction. The<br />
3D image sets were then fused; the MR images were used to delineate<br />
the target and critical structures (OAR), and the CT images were used<br />
for applicator reconstruction (Rotterdam). A standard plan was then<br />
viewed. The plan was optimised as required to keep the OAR doses<br />
below tolerance and to achieve the required target doses.<br />
: To optimise our plans we used a variety <strong>of</strong> techniques;<br />
removal <strong>of</strong> dwell positions from the top <strong>of</strong> the IUT, moving the dwell<br />
positions in the ovoids, using asymmetric dwell times in the ovoids or<br />
asymmetric ovoid sizes, and changing the normalisation value at point<br />
A. In the majority <strong>of</strong> treatments these optimisation techniques<br />
resulted in reduced OAR doses with the desired HRCTV D90 coverage.<br />
The graph below compares the HRCTV volumes against the LQ doses<br />
for the total treatment (including the EBRT dose) for the HRCTV D90<br />
and the corresponding D2cc doses for the OAR. The tolerance dose lines<br />
indicate the doses that are considered to be acceptable for the<br />
different OAR.<br />
HRCTV volumes up to 40cc were treated adequately (>75Gy but<br />
ideally >84Gy) without exceeding the OAR tolerance doses in 88% <strong>of</strong><br />
our cases.<br />
: Individual optimisation <strong>of</strong> treatment plans per fraction is<br />
required to account for differences in applicator position, <strong>org</strong>an at<br />
risk location and tumour response/position. Volumes greater than<br />
40cc are difficult to cover adequately with optimisation alone without<br />
exceeding the OAR doses. The addition <strong>of</strong> interstitial needles to our<br />
intracavitary technique may have increased the HRCTV dose in <strong>12</strong>% <strong>of</strong><br />
our patients. Our results with a volume <strong>of</strong> 40cc are comparable with<br />
that stated by the GECESTRO group for plan optimisation without<br />
needles.<br />
PO288<br />
A NOVEL COMPUTER PROGRAM TO SUPPORT MRGUIDED GYNECOLOGIC<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
J. Egger 1 , X.C. Chen 1 , T.K. Kapur 1 , A.N.V. Viswanathan 2<br />
1<br />
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology, Boston<br />
MA, USA<br />
2<br />
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Boston MA, USA<br />
: To describe a novel computer program designed<br />
and implemented to provide an overall system for supporting MR<br />
guided gynecologic brachytherapy.<br />
: From September 2011 to January 20<strong>12</strong>, <strong>10</strong><br />
gynecologiccancer patients requiring brachytherapy underwent<br />
imageguided applicator insertion in a multimodal operating suite with<br />
integrated MR scanner, ultrasound and PET/CT scanner. In order to<br />
increase the physician's speed and monitor the consequences <strong>of</strong><br />
inserting interstitial catheters in real time, a novel computer program<br />
was designed and implemented and is described here.<br />
: The overall system starts with preimplant imaging and the<br />
integrated s<strong>of</strong>tware permits measurement <strong>of</strong> relevant sizes for<br />
intervention leading to automatic inventory control and specific<br />
applicator request. Next, a device is selected (e.g., tandem and<br />
ring/ovoid +/ interstitial needles or interstitial needles alone) that is<br />
modeled in the preoperative images. Virtual modeling and<br />
visualization <strong>of</strong> several instruments for direct device comparison is<br />
enabled to identify the optimal one. In the intraoperative stage, the<br />
patient is imaged using 3 Tesla MRI with legs in the insertion position.<br />
The computervisualized template allows guidance to an optimal<br />
position for dose delivery. Serial imaging examinations are<br />
superimposed on the visualization <strong>of</strong> the modeled device. With this<br />
interactive novel s<strong>of</strong>tware program, the physician can select which<br />
interstitial needles may best benefit the patient, and at what depth<br />
they should be inserted, as determined by the MRI image viewed<br />
during the insertion process. The physician then inserts the correct<br />
interstitial needle into the necessary applicator hole based on the<br />
tumor location as visualized on intraoperative 3T MRI (see Figure).<br />
<br />
: Novel s<strong>of</strong>tware was developed that aids in the<br />
integration <strong>of</strong> preoperative assessment, intraoperative 3T imaging and<br />
applicator insertion. Novel features include 1) linking a diagnostic<br />
imaging set in realtime to a 3D CAD model <strong>of</strong> a medical device; 2)<br />
precise identification <strong>of</strong> catheter location in the 3D imaging model<br />
with realtime imaging feedback and 3) the ability to perform patient<br />
specific preimplant evaluation by assessing in the computer the<br />
placement <strong>of</strong> interstitial needles prior to an intervention via virtual<br />
template matching with a diagnostic scan.<br />
PO289<br />
MULTICHANNEL VAGINAL BRACHYTHERAPY: OVERKILL OR NECESSITY?<br />
S. Park 1 , J. Demanes 1 , M. Steinberg 1 , M. Kamrava 1<br />
1<br />
David Geffen School <strong>of</strong> Medicine at UCLA, Radiation Oncology, Los<br />
Angeles CA, USA<br />
: Singlechannel cylinder applicators are most<br />
commonly used to treat early stage endometrial cancers. Multichannel<br />
applicators have been developed to reduce the dose to <strong>org</strong>ans at risk<br />
(OARs) while optimizing dose to the target. The Capri (Varian Medical<br />
Systems) is a vaginal applicator with 13 channels. It is not clear how<br />
best to utilize all these channels for treatment planning. We<br />
conducted a dosimetry study using this device to determine the<br />
dosimetric advantages/disadvantages in utilizing various combinations<br />
<strong>of</strong> channels.<br />
: The Capri consists <strong>of</strong> a single central catheter<br />
(R1), an inner array <strong>of</strong> six catheters (R2), and an outer array <strong>of</strong> six<br />
catheters (R3). A total <strong>of</strong> 78 plans were generated by using 6 different<br />
catheter arrangements (R1, R2, R<strong>12</strong>, R13, R23, and R<strong>12</strong>3). The target<br />
volume was defined as a 2 mm circumferential shell extending 4 cm in<br />
length around the Capri device. A urinary catheter and contrast were<br />
used to assist in contouring bladder, rectum, and urethra. 3D plans<br />
were generated with the Nucletron Oncentra MasterPlan to deliver 6.0<br />
Gy per fraction to the target. An inverse planning simulated annealing<br />
optimization algorithm was applied to ensure the prescription dose<br />
covered >99% <strong>of</strong> the target and minimized dose to the OARs. Target<br />
coverage and OAR doses <strong>of</strong> the various catheter arrangements were<br />
compared. Statistical significance was evaluated with a twotail<br />
paired ttest to ruleout the null hypothesis that there is no difference<br />
between the reference plan R<strong>12</strong>3 (all 13 channels) and the various<br />
other plans.<br />
: Target Dose Coverage: Figure shows on average all plans had<br />
the same target coverage V<strong>10</strong>0 and D90 (p>0.05). Target hot spot: The<br />
V150 for R<strong>12</strong>3 (2.3%), R2 (1.5%), and R23 (2.7%) were similar (p=0.2).<br />
The R<strong>12</strong> had the smallest hot spot (1.1%, p=0.001). The R1 was larger
S116 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
(8.1%, p=0.02) and R13 was the largest (25.0%, p0.05). They were statistically better than all the<br />
other plans (p<strong>10</strong> on their pre treatment PET scan. 60% <strong>of</strong><br />
distant metastases occurred in patients with a nodal SUV >4 on pre<br />
treatment PET scan. In patients with 3 month post treatment PET scan<br />
(54%), 75% <strong>of</strong> patients with a SUV >4 suffered a local recurrence. 30<br />
month estimates for local control, disease free survival, metastasis<br />
free survival, and overall survival using KM curves are 80%, 30%, 42%<br />
and 65% respectively.<br />
: MRI based interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced<br />
cancers <strong>of</strong> the cervix and vagina results in a high rate <strong>of</strong> local control.<br />
Additionally, a HRCTV D90 > 95%, an initial staging PETCT SUV max<br />
><strong>10</strong> and a 3 month posttreatment SUV <strong>of</strong> >4 correlate well with local<br />
control. A pretreatment PETCT nodal SUV >4 may be a better<br />
predictor for distant metastasis than an SUV ><strong>10</strong> <strong>of</strong> the primary.<br />
Though longer followup is required, MRI based planning appears to<br />
provide initial excellent local control and distant metastasis free<br />
survival.<br />
PO293<br />
OUTCOMES FOR RECURRENT ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WITH HDR<br />
INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY UTILIZING MRI BASED PLANNING<br />
M.C. Biagioli 1 , J.M. Freilich 1 , A. Cruz 1 , A.S. Saini 1 , D.C. Hunt 1 , J. Shi 1 ,<br />
D.C. Fernandez 1<br />
1<br />
H. Lee M<strong>of</strong>fitt Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, Tampa Florida,<br />
USA<br />
: Recent data has emerged demonstrating<br />
significant advantages to MRI based planning over CT based planning<br />
in the brachytherapy treatment <strong>of</strong> cancer <strong>of</strong> the cervix. The purpose<br />
<strong>of</strong> this study is to evaluate our experience utilizing MRI based<br />
brachytherapy treatment planning for patients with recurrent<br />
endometrial cancers who underwent an interstitial implant as part <strong>of</strong><br />
there treatment.<br />
: A retrospective review was conducted <strong>of</strong> all<br />
endometrial cancer recurrences treated at M<strong>of</strong>fitt Cancer Center from<br />
20092011 where 1.5 T contrast enhanced MRI based high dose rate<br />
(HDR) interstitial brachytherapy was part <strong>of</strong> their treatment plan. <strong>12</strong><br />
patients were identified and local recurrence, disease free survival,<br />
metastasis free survival, and overall survival were analyzed in the<br />
whole group and based on prognostic features and treatment plans.<br />
: Mean followup was <strong>10</strong> months (range 216). 92% <strong>of</strong> patients<br />
had recurrent disease, 17% received chemotherapy and 83% received<br />
external beam radiation therapy with a median dose (range) <strong>of</strong> 4920<br />
cGy (43205500). Median (range) brachytherapy total dose and dose<br />
per fraction was 2500 cGy (22003500) and 500 cGy (450600),<br />
respectively. Local recurrence rate was 16.7% with estimated mean<br />
time to local recurrence <strong>of</strong> 13 months. In patients with the CTV D90<br />
greater than 95%, local recurrence was <strong>10</strong>% versus 50% if less than or<br />
equal to 95%. Disease free survival was 67% with estimated mean time<br />
to event <strong>of</strong> 9 months. Metastasis free survival was 80% in patients<br />
without metastatic disease on presentation with estimated mean time<br />
to metastasis <strong>of</strong> 7 months. Overall survival was 67% with estimated<br />
mean time to death <strong>of</strong> 9 months. 15 month estimates for local<br />
control, disease free survival, metastasis free survival, and overall<br />
survival using KM curves are 70%, 62%, 62% and 62%, respectively.<br />
: MRI guided interstitial brachytherapy results in a high<br />
level <strong>of</strong> local control in patients with pelvic recurrences after primary<br />
treatment for endometrial cancer. Though initial followup is short<br />
this local control appears to result in a high level <strong>of</strong> DFS. Of the 2<br />
local failures there was no pretreatment PET information available.<br />
Additionally, patient number was too small to determine the utility <strong>of</strong><br />
3 month posttreatment PET as a predictor for local or distant<br />
failures.<br />
PO294<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
TURKEY<br />
EXPERIENCE IN GYNAECOLOGICAL TUMORS IN<br />
I. Aslay 1 , B.W.G. <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> Working Group 2<br />
1<br />
Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Radiation Oncology, Istanbul,<br />
Turkey<br />
2<br />
Oncology Institutes, Radiation Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey<br />
: This study is conducted to evaluate the<br />
brachytherapy experience in gynaecological tumors in Turkey.<br />
: Gynaecological brachytherapy data <strong>of</strong> 11<br />
medical faculty, one government hospital and two private hospitals<br />
between 19702011 was collected. Ovarian cancer was not included.<br />
Median brachytherapy (BrT) experience <strong>of</strong> the centers was <strong>12</strong> (141)<br />
years. The total number <strong>of</strong> the patients (pts) was 297<strong>12</strong>4 and 7% <strong>of</strong><br />
them was gynaecological tumor (except ovary). The ratio <strong>of</strong> the<br />
tumors was %49 in cervix carcinoma (CC), %46 in endometrium<br />
carcinoma (EC), %1 in vagina carcinoma (VaC), %3 in vulvar carcinoma<br />
(VuC).<br />
: For curative treatment <strong>of</strong> CC concomitant chemotherapy<br />
(CCh) 40mg/m2 weekly was standard procedure in all centers. In<br />
postoperative CC , Cch was given if poor prognostic factors present<br />
such as positive margin, positive lymph node, bulky tumor, positive<br />
parametrium. Adjuvant Ch to radiotherapy was not given in any<br />
center. The incidence <strong>of</strong> the pts treated with curative intent in EC<br />
and VuC was low. Ch was given in EC pts if advanced stage or poor<br />
hystology was present. In VuC, Ch was given due to comorbidities <strong>of</strong><br />
the pts and also BrT was not applicated as a treatment component<br />
except in salvage therapy. VaC was treated mostly with the same<br />
protocol <strong>of</strong> CC. Salvage treatment was done with external<br />
radiotherapy (ERT) and/or BrT in two centers, with only ERT in 3<br />
centers and with cyberknife in one center. Eight centers have no<br />
salvage treatment experience. ERT technigues were 3D and IMRT in<br />
three centers, 3D in 7 centers, 2D and 3D in 4 centers. Except two<br />
centers with two and one center with 5 BrT machines all the others<br />
have one HDR treatment unit. BrT technigue was 3D in 6 , 2D in 8<br />
centers. Two centers also have LDR experience. ERT, BrT and total<br />
treatment doses are listed in table 1.
S118 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
: In gynaecological tumors BrT is an impotant component<br />
<strong>of</strong> the radiotherapy. In this study we found that there is a variability<br />
in the BrT techniques and doses between centers in Turkey. The<br />
<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> Working Group is continuing to collect data for further<br />
studies.<br />
PO295<br />
DOSIMETRIC GAIN OF UTRECHT INTERSTITIAL CT/MRI APPLICATOR IN<br />
CERVICAL CANCER HDRBRACHYTHERAPY<br />
C. Camacho 1 , F. Celada 2 , S. Roldán 2 , A. Tormo 2 , J.C. Morales 2 , V.<br />
Carmona 1 , M.C. GarciaMora 2 , F. Lliso 1 , S. Rodríguez 3 , J. Pérez<br />
Calatayud 1<br />
1<br />
Hospital Universitario La Fe, Radiation OncologyPhysics, Valencia,<br />
Spain<br />
2<br />
Hospital Universitario La Fe, Radiotherapy (Phy), Valencia, Spain<br />
3<br />
Clínica Benidorm, Radiation Oncology, Benidorm, Spain<br />
: The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is to check the<br />
potential gain, in dosimetric terms, <strong>of</strong> the Utrecht<br />
intracavitary/interstitial CT/MR applicator over the Fletcher<br />
intracavitary (Nucletron®) applicator for MRI imaging—guided HDR<br />
brachytherapy in cervical cancer patients.<br />
: Ten applications, using 6 needleUtrecht<br />
applicator, were analyzed in this study. For each application two<br />
theoretical different HDRplans were elaborates, manually optimized<br />
in MRI: (1) with needles and (2) without needles (Fletcher<br />
intracavitary applicator). Considering 45 Gy external beam, four ~7 Gy<br />
fractions were prescribed according to GECESTRO recommendations.<br />
After assessing DVHs for highrisk clinical target volume (HRCTV),<br />
intermediaterisk clinical target volume (IRCTV), bladder, rectum and<br />
sigmoid and doses converting to the equivalent dose in 2 Gy (EQD2),<br />
D90/D2cc quotients as HRCTV as IRCTV, for all OARs <strong>of</strong> two plans<br />
were obtained for comparison between them. Then D90/D2cc<br />
quotient <strong>of</strong> needleplan versus no needleplan was obtained.<br />
: Quotient <strong>of</strong> needleplan versus no needleplan were: in case<br />
<strong>of</strong> HRCTV 1,30[1,790,95], 1,21[2,1<strong>10</strong>,81] and 1,07[1,420,77] for<br />
bladder, rectum and sigmoid, and in case <strong>of</strong> IRCTV 1,46[1,971,15],<br />
1,33[1,671,08] and 1,19[1,461,01] respectively.<br />
: Although always according to GECESTRO<br />
recommendations, not all needleplans show a favorable ratio<br />
between HRCTV coverage and OARS doses. But as we are assessing IR<br />
CTV, all needleplans are favorable. In such cases, that planning is<br />
conditioned by a small HRCTV (e.g. complete remission after EBRT)<br />
and a wide IRCTV because <strong>of</strong> diagnosesGTV, interstitialBT is useful<br />
for right coverage <strong>of</strong> microscopic disease. The benefit <strong>of</strong> interstitial<br />
BT is shown in all other needleplans for both HRCTV and IRCTV.<br />
Sigmoid benefits the least from interstitialBT, but average is<br />
favorable. Bladder is most favored. On the basis <strong>of</strong> our results all<br />
patients benefit from the using Utrecht intracavitary/interstitial<br />
CT/MR applicator for MRI imaging—guided HDRbrachytherapy, so, in<br />
our institution, all cervical cancer patients are treated with Utrecht<br />
applicator.<br />
PO296<br />
CLINICAL AND DOSIMETRIC RESULTS OF HDR BRACHYTHERAPY GUIDED<br />
WITH MRI<br />
P. Antonini 1 , A. Tormo 1 , S. Roldán 1 , F. Celada 1 , C. Camacho 1 , V.<br />
Carmona 1 , J.C. Morales 1 , M.S. Rodríguez 1 , F. Lliso 1 , J. Pérez<br />
Calatayud 1<br />
1 Hospital Universitario La Fe, Radiation Oncology, Valencia, Spain<br />
: Summarize and report oncologic and dosimetric<br />
results <strong>of</strong> cervical cancer patients treated with magnetic resonance<br />
image (MRI) guided highdoserate brachytherapy (HDR BT).<br />
: Retrospective review <strong>of</strong> the records <strong>of</strong><br />
cervical cancer patients treated in our institution from September 07<br />
to march 20<strong>10</strong>. To be included in the study, the treatment had to<br />
fulfil the criteria: (1) include a previous treatment <strong>of</strong> at least 45 Gy <strong>of</strong><br />
external radiation (RTE) to the pelvis concomitant with cisplatin (2)<br />
the BT boost consisted in insertion <strong>of</strong> a Fletcher intracavitary<br />
(nucletron®) applicator under spinal anaesthesia and individualized<br />
MRI planning. Each treatment was composed <strong>of</strong> 2 applications (7 days<br />
apart), with 2 separated fractions <strong>of</strong> ~7 Gy (in 24 hours). All patients<br />
had squamous cervix cancer staged with FIGO’s 2009 classification for<br />
primary tumour size and AJCC 2006 classification for lymph node<br />
status. Tumour volume was also analyzed using EMBRACE protocol<br />
definitions. Toxicity scores were defined by CTCAE v 3.0.<br />
: 43 patients were found. The mean follow up for the entire<br />
group was <strong>12</strong> months (636). Mean patient age was 56 years. 82 %<br />
patients had FIGO tumours IIbIIIb and 76 % <strong>of</strong> them were N0 cases. 88<br />
% <strong>of</strong> patients had what EMBRACE defines as 'small tumours' or 'large<br />
tumours with good response to RTE'. The mean total cumulative dose<br />
was 76,2 Gy with mean D90 doses exceeding 85 and 65 Gy for HRCTV<br />
and IRCTV. ICRU in vesical and rectal points, maximal cumulative<br />
doses in 2 cm3 <strong>of</strong> bladder, rectum and sigmoid were, respectively:<br />
78.5; 82; 79.3; 61.2 and 58.2 Gy: Mean dose to H point was 71,7 Gy.<br />
Major (G3 or more) genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were<br />
present in 2 and 4 % respectively. Three (7 %) patients had local<br />
persistent disease, all <strong>of</strong> them with large tumour nonresponsive to RT<br />
and 2 <strong>of</strong> them also with uncontrolled systemic disease.<br />
: MRIguided HDRbrachytherapy, in accordance with GEC<br />
ESTRO recommendations, is a safe technique in terms <strong>of</strong> local control<br />
and toxicity. These clinical and dosimetric results compare favourably<br />
with traditional technique.<br />
PO297<br />
IMAGEGUIDED BRACHYTHERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT OF CERVICAL<br />
CANCER: RESULTS ON DIFFERENT PACKING TECHNIQUES<br />
B. Libby 1 , K. Ding 1 , E. Crandley 1 , K.A. Reardon 1 , B.F. Schneider 1<br />
1 University <strong>of</strong> Virginia, Radiation Oncology, Charlottesville, USA<br />
Historically, gynecological brachytherapy<br />
applicators have been placed in an operating room, with gauze<br />
packing used to both immobilize the applicator and to reduce dose to<br />
bladder and rectum by increasing their distance from the applicator.<br />
The patient is then moved to a CT scanner for 3D imaging, and then to<br />
the radiation oncology department for treatment. If the packing is<br />
inadequate, the treatment will either be suboptimal or will need to<br />
be aborted. With the advent <strong>of</strong> image guided brachytherapy (IGBT)<br />
suites with dedicated imaging systems, inadequate packing can be<br />
assessed and corrected prior to treatment. In this investigation we<br />
present the effectiveness in reducing critical structure doses and<br />
overall procedure time <strong>of</strong> IGBT by providing optimal packing and<br />
planning for cervical cancer patients treated with HDR.<br />
: Patients undergoing HDR brachytherapy had<br />
tandem and ovoid applicators placed in the IGBT suite, which has an<br />
operating room couch with carbon fiber insert, full anesthesia<br />
capabilities, a Siemens Somatom CT on rails, and a Varisource HDR<br />
unit. Vaginal packing was accomplished with either gauze or the<br />
Alatus balloon system. Before planning, the CT images were<br />
evaluated to determine whether the packing or balloon placement<br />
was optimal. For cases in which the packing was suboptimal, the<br />
packing was redone and the patient was scanned again for treatment<br />
planning. Patients remained in the scanning position during planning<br />
and treatment. For this evaluation <strong>of</strong> varying packing techniques all<br />
doses were prescribed to Point A, with the dose to the ICRU 38<br />
bladder and rectal points determined, as well as the D2cc and D1cc <strong>of</strong><br />
the bladder and rectum.<br />
:<br />
We present a range <strong>of</strong> dosimetric results for both gauze and balloon<br />
packing in Table 1. For a patient in which the Alatus system was<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 119<br />
used, the first insertion <strong>of</strong> the balloons was suboptimal, thus the<br />
predicted doses to the bladder and rectal points were suboptimal. Re<br />
insertion <strong>of</strong> the balloons was performed for optimal treatment. A CT<br />
scan after balloon removal also demonstrated their utility in reducing<br />
bladder and rectal doses. For a patient in which gauze packing was<br />
used, differences between optimal and suboptimal packing that occur<br />
during the procedure are shown. Optimal packing reduced the average<br />
time from applicator insertion to treatment to an average <strong>of</strong> 54<br />
minutes, as opposed to 70 minutes for suboptimal packing which<br />
would require being corrected before treatment. The reduced<br />
planning time allows use <strong>of</strong> less anesthesia for the patient.<br />
: Dedicated IGBT suites allow for the correction <strong>of</strong><br />
suboptimal vaginal packing, and a reduction in overall treatment<br />
planning and delivery time. In the context <strong>of</strong> IGBT, in which the<br />
applicator is placed and the treatment planning scans and treatment<br />
occur without movement <strong>of</strong> the patient, use <strong>of</strong> balloon packing<br />
systems may allow for more optimal packing than gauze packing.<br />
PO298<br />
ESTIMATION OF BOWEL DOSE FOR ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA TREATED<br />
BY HIGH DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY ALONE INITIAL RESULTS<br />
A. Zuchora 1 , L. Fahy 1 , M. Pomeroy 2<br />
1<br />
University Hospital Galway, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics, Galway,<br />
Ireland Republic <strong>of</strong><br />
2<br />
University Hospital Galway, Radiotherapy Department, Galway,<br />
Ireland Republic <strong>of</strong><br />
: To analyze the results <strong>of</strong> an initial study using<br />
oral contrast to improve the estimation <strong>of</strong> the dose received by the<br />
bowel during HDR brachytherapy (BT) treatment alone for<br />
endometrial carcinoma after total abdominal hysterectomy bilateral<br />
salpingooophorectomy (TAO/BSO).<br />
: The protocol for treatment endometrial<br />
carcinoma at Radiotherapy Department at University Galway Hospital<br />
is to use BT alone with total dose 25Gy in five fractions prescribed to<br />
0.5 cm from the vaginal surface with standard active lengths <strong>of</strong> 4 cm.<br />
BT treatment is delivered twice weekly. Since the beginning <strong>of</strong> 2011<br />
all patients treated with HDR cylinder insertion have been<br />
administered oral contrast. This analysis deals only with patients with<br />
BT treatment alone, without previous External Beam. Seven patients<br />
were included in this analysis, 5 patients FIGO I and 2 patients FIGO II.<br />
<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> was performed with vaginal cylinders (Varian) with<br />
diameters dependent on patient anatomy. Before each insertion <strong>10</strong> ml<br />
oral contrast Gastrografin (Bayer Schering Pharma 37 ml Iodine per<br />
<strong>10</strong>0ml) in a cup <strong>of</strong> water was administrated. The cylinder was inserted<br />
approximately 45 min1 hour later and Computer Tommography (CT)<br />
scanning using ACQsim Philips Medical System for dose planning with 3<br />
mm slice thicknesses was done. Contouring <strong>of</strong> Organs at Risk (OAR)<br />
and planning were prepared in the Brachyvision System Planning<br />
version <strong>10</strong>.0.34 after every insertion. Doses at Bladder, Rectum and<br />
Bowel in 0.1,1 and 2cc volume and point doses based on ICRU report<br />
38 were reported and recalculated to 2Gy Equivalent Dose(EQD) base<br />
on the radiobiological linearquadratic model(LQM).<br />
: Oral contrast administration is an easy procedure which is<br />
well tolerated by the patient. Organs in pelvic area can change the<br />
position after a TAO/BSO surgical procedure. The CT verification scan<br />
is used to contour the OARs and doses can be monitored using Dose<br />
Volume Histograms (DVH) tools. The bowel position is more clearly<br />
visible when oral contrast has been administered and 3D dose<br />
distribution can be calculated. This additional information can be<br />
used to modify the treatment if necessary to maintain OAR dose<br />
tolerances. For two patients in the study individual vacpack<br />
immobilization was used after the first fraction to move the bowel<br />
away from the high dose area, in this way decreasing the bowel dose<br />
during the subsequent treatments.<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> patients data shows the doses in 2 cc bowel volume were:<br />
Bowel average dose for one fraction 2.5 ± 1.3Gy<br />
Bowel average dose in 2Gy EQD for one fraction 3.1 ± 2.2Gy<br />
Bowel average total dose for full treatment in 2Gy EQD2 15.6 ± 8Gy<br />
: This simple procedure can help with estimation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
dose in bowel and possibly decrease late bowel symptoms. In some<br />
cases CT verification gives the option to change patient position using<br />
individual immobilization devices and move the bowel from the high<br />
dose region.<br />
PO299<br />
3D MRIBASED HDRBRACHYTHERAPY PLANNING AND IMRT FOR THE<br />
TREATMENT OF CERVICAL CANCER<br />
P.T. Dyk 1 , A.J. Apicelli 1 , B. Sun 2 , C. Bertelsman 1 , J. Kavanaugh 2 , J.<br />
Rolfingsmeier 1 , T.A. DeWees 1 , J.L. GarciaRamirez 2 , J.K. Schwarz 2 ,<br />
P.W. Grigsby 2<br />
1<br />
Barnes Jewish Hospital, Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, USA<br />
2<br />
Washington University in St. Louis, Radiation Oncology, St. Louis,<br />
USA<br />
: To evaluate dose volume parameters for targets<br />
and <strong>org</strong>ansat risk (OAR) using MRIbased HDRbrachytherapy<br />
treatment planning and IMRT in a series <strong>of</strong> patients treated at a large<br />
volume academic cancer center in the United States.<br />
: Between December 2009 and July 2011, 50<br />
patients with stage Ib1IVa cervical cancer were diagnosed and<br />
treated using definitive radiation therapy, with or without<br />
chemotherapy. Treatment consisted <strong>of</strong> external radiation therapy<br />
using IMRT directed at the cervical mass and pelvic lymph nodes using<br />
the PETCT simulation technique. All patients received 6 weekly HDR<br />
brachytherapy treatments beginning week 1 <strong>of</strong> IMRT. MRI simulation<br />
was used for each HDR fraction. The gross tumor volume (GTV) at<br />
each fraction was delineated using diffusion weighted and/or T2<br />
weighted images. Subsequent symmetrical expansions were made at<br />
3, 5, 7, and <strong>10</strong> mm to form highrisk clinical tumor volumes (HR CTV),<br />
avoiding the rectum, bladder, and sigmoid. Doses in 2 Gy equivalent<br />
fractions (EQD2) to the 90% and <strong>10</strong>0% volumes for each fraction were<br />
recorded and summed. Doses to the 2cc OAR's were recorded and<br />
summed. The mean dose from the IMRT plan for each OAR was<br />
summed to the 2cc dose. The D90 and D<strong>10</strong>0 <strong>of</strong> the cervical mass from<br />
the IMRT plan was summed to the D90 and D<strong>10</strong>0 for the GTV and HR<br />
CTV expansions. Patients were followed for local control and toxicity<br />
until censored or lost to follow up.<br />
: Median follow up was 9.7 months. Platinumbased<br />
chemotherapy was administered in 86% <strong>of</strong> the patients. All 50 patients<br />
completed the planned 6 brachytherapy fractions. The median dose to<br />
the cervical tumor and lymph nodes from IMRT was 20 Gy and 50.4 Gy<br />
in 28 fractions. Three <strong>of</strong> the 50 patients did not complete EBRT. There<br />
were 5 local failures at a median time <strong>of</strong> 4.4 months after diagnosis.<br />
The median D90/D<strong>10</strong>0 EQD2's for the patients who failed vs. those<br />
who did not for the GTV, HR CTV 3, 5, 7, and <strong>10</strong> volumes are listed in<br />
the table below:<br />
Failed<br />
locally<br />
Did NOT fail<br />
locally<br />
GTV<br />
(D90/D<strong>10</strong>0)<br />
HR CTV<br />
3mm<br />
39.4/60.5 Gy 34.4/49.9<br />
Gy<br />
71.9/<strong>10</strong>3.1<br />
Gy<br />
59.5/83.7<br />
Gy<br />
HR CTV<br />
5mm<br />
32.1/46.8<br />
Gy<br />
55.2/78.2<br />
Gy<br />
HR CTV 7<br />
mm<br />
30.4/44.1<br />
Gy<br />
38.1/55.7<br />
Gy<br />
HR CTV<br />
<strong>10</strong>mm<br />
27.7/39.8<br />
Gy<br />
33.7/49.1<br />
Gy<br />
There were 4 late grades 3 or 4 toxicities at a median <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> months<br />
following diagnosis. These were a rectosigmoid perforation, a recto<br />
vaginal fistula, and 2 vesicovaginal fistulaes. The median EQD2 2cc<br />
bladder dose was 85.0 Gy for those with a bladder complications<br />
compared to 92.2 Gy for those without. Both patients with VV<br />
fistulaes had initial IVa disease invading the bladder. The median<br />
EQD2 2cc doses for the rectum were 80.4 Gy for the 2 patients who<br />
suffered G3+ rectal complications compared to 70.8 Gy for those who<br />
did not. The EQD2 2cc for the sigmoid in the patient with the<br />
rectosigmoid perforation was 80.0 Gy vs. 68.4 Gy for the remaining<br />
patients.<br />
: Longer follow up and a greater number <strong>of</strong> patients will<br />
be needed to determine which dosevolume parameters best predict<br />
local control, and bladder, rectal, and sigmoid toxicity using our<br />
technique in the treatment <strong>of</strong> cervical cancer.<br />
PO300<br />
DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D BRACHYTHERAPY PLANNING<br />
G. Kemikler 1 , I. Aslay 2 , S. Kucucuk 2 , I. Özbay 1<br />
1<br />
Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Radiophysics, Istanbul, Turkey<br />
2<br />
Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Radiation Oncology, Istanbul,<br />
Turkey
S<strong>12</strong>0 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
: To compare dosimetrically 2D and 3D<br />
brachytherapy planning in the curative treatment <strong>of</strong> cervix carcinoma.<br />
: With the guidance <strong>of</strong> MR images that were<br />
taken before and after the external radiotherapy, CT based<br />
brachytherapy planning was performed in 5 patients.The CTMR<br />
compatible Fletcher applicators were used. Two different dose<br />
perscription and fractionation schedules were used for comparison <strong>of</strong><br />
2D Point A and 3D HRCTV. One radiation oncologist who is<br />
experienced in brachytherapy deliniated the target (HRCTV, IMRCTV)<br />
and OAR (rectum, bladder, sigmoid) volumes on CT images. In 2D<br />
planning normalization to Point A was done without<br />
optimisation.However in 3D planning reference dose was given to<br />
HRCTV with normalization and optimisation . Oncentra 3.1 version <strong>of</strong><br />
TPS was used. Dose schedules were 7Gy/ 3 fractions (EQD2=29,75Gy)<br />
and 6 Gy/4 fractions (EQD2=32Gy). Doses at 2 cc <strong>of</strong> OAR volumes were<br />
calculated. Paired ttest was used in statistical analyses.<br />
:<br />
The results are given in table1.<br />
HRCTV<br />
90%<br />
IMRCTV<br />
90%<br />
Rectum 2cc (Gy) Bladder 2cc (Gy)<br />
Sigmoid<br />
2 cc<br />
(Gy)<br />
Point<br />
196±26 133±36 14±5<br />
A 7x3<br />
20±3 15±4<br />
Point<br />
171±43 <strong>12</strong>5±39 16±5<br />
A 6x4<br />
23±3 18±5<br />
p:NS p:NS p:0,003 p:0,000 p:0,007<br />
Point<br />
196±26 133±36 14±5<br />
A 7x3<br />
20±3 15±4<br />
HRCTV<br />
<strong>10</strong>1±1<br />
7x3<br />
65±9 7±3 <strong>10</strong>±3 7±1<br />
p:0,022 p:0,019 p:0,021 p:0,006 p:0,005<br />
Point<br />
171±43 <strong>12</strong>5±39 16±6<br />
A 6x4<br />
23±3 18±5<br />
HRCTV<br />
<strong>10</strong>1±1<br />
6x4<br />
67±7 9±3 <strong>12</strong>±3 9±1<br />
p:0,020 p:0,023 p:0,031 p:0,006 p:0,007<br />
HRCTV<br />
<strong>10</strong>1±1<br />
7x3<br />
65±9 7±3 <strong>10</strong>±3 7±1<br />
HRCTV<br />
<strong>10</strong>1±1<br />
6x4<br />
67±7 9±3 <strong>12</strong>±3 9±1<br />
p:NS p:NS p:0,014 p:0,006 p:NS<br />
: In this study it was found that HRV, IMRV and OAR doses<br />
were higher in 2D (Point A) planning than in 3D (HRCTV) optimized<br />
planning. Thus, fewer side effects would be expected with 3D<br />
planning. In 3D planning, between 7x3 and 6x4 fractionation similar<br />
HRCTV 90% and IMRCTV 90% were found . But, significantly higher<br />
rectum and bladder doses were found in 6x4 fractionation. Therefore,<br />
7x3 fractionation can be prefered especially by busy clinics.<br />
PO301<br />
SOURCE POSITION LOCALIZATION FOR ICBT TANDEM & OVOID<br />
APPLICATORS UTILIZING ONCENTRA BRACHY APPLICATOR MODELING<br />
J. Kemp 1 , M. Price 1<br />
1<br />
Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Medical Physics, Baton Rouge LA,<br />
USA<br />
: Nucletron’s Oncentra Brachy Applicator<br />
Modelingplugin (AMp) may facilitate HDR cervical brachytherapy<br />
treatment planning whenimage quality inhibits dwell position<br />
localization. When registered with a ICBTpatient’s CT/MR, the AMp<br />
utilizes a 3D CAD rendering <strong>of</strong> the corresponding applicatorto define<br />
possible source dwell positions. As such, imaging artifacts thatwould<br />
normally inhibit the accurate selection <strong>of</strong> dwell positions<br />
viaintercolpostatic dwell position markers or measurement from an<br />
applicatorbasedlandmark will be <strong>of</strong> little consequence. Heret<strong>of</strong>ore,<br />
literature has lacked anyverification <strong>of</strong> the accuracy or utility <strong>of</strong> the<br />
AMp. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this studyis to compare the equivalence <strong>of</strong><br />
source localization within a CT/MRFletchertype tandem and ovoid<br />
applicator utilizing current clinical practiceand Oncentra’s AMp in a<br />
water phantom containing OAR surrogate structures.<br />
: KVCT image sets with 0.976mm x 0.976mm x<br />
1.25mm voxelswere acquired <strong>of</strong> a water phantom following clinical<br />
protocol containing bladderand rectum surrogates as well as an<br />
assembled Nucletron’s Fletcher CT/MRapplicator with various ovoid<br />
sizes (20, 25, 30mm) and a 30 o tandem.Using the Oncentra Brachy<br />
TPS, OARsurrogates were segmented and catheters<br />
werereconstructed using (1) institutional clinical protocols for T&O<br />
basedbrachytherapy (i.e. usingintercolpostatic dwell position markers)<br />
and (2) using the AMp. Treatment plans were then generated<br />
followingclinical protocol, which ensures a dose <strong>of</strong> 600cGy to the ICRU<br />
38defined PointA. The coordinates corresponding to the center <strong>of</strong><br />
each active dwell position,resulting from each method, were spatially<br />
compared. The dosimetric impact <strong>of</strong>these differences was quantified<br />
by determining D0.1cc, D1ccand D2cc for the surrogate OARs.<br />
: Preliminary results obtained for the 25mm ovoid/ 30 o tandem<br />
applicator demonstrate 80% <strong>of</strong> dwell positions definedutilizing clinical<br />
protocol and the AMp agree within 1mm with a maximum deviation<strong>of</strong><br />
1.17mm, both less than the resolution <strong>of</strong> the kVCT scan. Differences<br />
insource position definitions resulted in an increase <strong>of</strong> 2.9%, 0.48% and<br />
0.3% and0.66%, 0.87%, and 0.59% for D0.1cc , D1cc and D2ccfor the<br />
bladder and rectumsurrogates, respectively, when utilizing the<br />
AMprather than clinical protocol for source position localization. This<br />
limiteddata indicates that use <strong>of</strong> the AMp for dwell position<br />
localization isequivalent to our clinical practice.<br />
: Preliminary resultsindicate that source dwell position<br />
localization utilizing Nucletron’sApplicator Modeling plugin and our<br />
clinical protocol results in equivalentdosimetry for the simple, water<br />
phantom geometry investigated. Currently we are investigating the<br />
validity<strong>of</strong> this conclusion utilizing ovoids <strong>of</strong> different sizes as well as<br />
aCT/MRcompatible vaginal cylinder.<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S <strong>12</strong>1<br />
PO302<br />
COMBINATION OF EXTERNAL BEAM IRRADIATION AND LOWDOSE RATE<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY FOR INOPERABLE ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMAS<br />
A. Baumann 1 , C. CharraBrunaud 1 , S. H<strong>of</strong>fstetter 1 , D. Peiffert 1<br />
1 Centre Alexis Vautrin, Radiotherapy, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France<br />
: The standard treatment for early stage<br />
endometrial carcinoma is total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral<br />
salpingooophorectomy. However 3 to 9% <strong>of</strong> patients are inoperable<br />
because <strong>of</strong> comorbidities or age. Such patients can be treated with a<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and<br />
brachytherapy. The goal <strong>of</strong> this study was to update our experience <strong>of</strong><br />
combining EBRT and intracavity lowdose rate (LDR) brachytherapy for<br />
inoperable endometrial carcinomas.<br />
: The files <strong>of</strong> 56 patients treated at the Centre<br />
Alexis Vautrin between 1995 and 20<strong>10</strong> for inoperable endometrial<br />
carcinoma were reviewed. Seventyone per cent were stage I tumor<br />
(based on the 1971 FIGO classification), 11% stage II, 16% stage III and<br />
2% stage IV. The mean age <strong>of</strong> the patients was 70.1 years, and the<br />
mean BMI was 35.8 kg/m 2 . The EBRT dose to the pelvis was 30 Gy in<br />
the absence <strong>of</strong> involved nodes on imaging and 45 to 50 Gy in case <strong>of</strong><br />
involved nodes. The brachytherapy CTV was defined as the whole<br />
uterus plus the upper third <strong>of</strong> the vagina; most patients had 3D<br />
dosimetry based on CT imaging. The prescribed dose was 15 to 30 Gy<br />
to obtain a total CTV dose on the CTV <strong>of</strong> 60 to 65 Gy including EBRT<br />
dose.<br />
: At 5 years, local control, diseasespecific survival and overall<br />
survival were 84.4 %, 59.5 % and 36.8 % respectively. For Stage I<br />
histologic grade 1 patients, diseasespecific survival was 79.6 %.<br />
Eighteen patients (33 %) showed progressive disease, <strong>12</strong> <strong>of</strong> whom had<br />
an initial stage ≥ II. Only one patient with a stage I tumor developed a<br />
local recurrence.<br />
One patient presented with an acute toxicity grade 3 after EBRT. No<br />
severe acute brachytherapy side effects were observed. One patient<br />
suffered a thromboembolic event immediately after brachytherapy.<br />
Late effects <strong>of</strong> grade 3 or higher were seen in 5 patients, 1 rectal<br />
toxicity and 5 vaginal toxicities.<br />
: The combination <strong>of</strong> EBRT and LDR brachytherapy as<br />
exclusive treatment <strong>of</strong> medically inoperable patients with<br />
endometrial cancer is welltolerated and results in excellent local<br />
control rate. It should be recommended as an alternative treatment<br />
for stage I inoperable patients.<br />
PO303<br />
ANISOTROPIC DOSE MODEL OF INTRACAVITARY VAGINAL<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY USING MULTIRING INFLATABLE APPLICATOR<br />
H. Kuo 1 , R. Yaparpalvi 1 , K. Mehta 1 , L. Hong 1 , A. Wu 2 , D. Mynampati 1 ,<br />
W. Bodner 1 , M. Garg 1 , S. Kalnicki 1<br />
1<br />
Montefiore Medical Center, Radiation Oncology Department, Bronx,<br />
USA<br />
2<br />
Thomas Jefferson University, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiologic Science,<br />
Philidelphia, USA<br />
: An inflatable applicator (Capri TM , Varian, Palo<br />
Alto, USA) with thirteen lumens is designed with the advantage <strong>of</strong><br />
reducing air pocket, and conforming dose to patient tissues. It is<br />
arranged in two concentric rings (with six lumens each) surrounding a<br />
central lumen. This study investigates the efficacy <strong>of</strong> dose shielding to<br />
normal tissue with anisotropic planning models.<br />
: Anisotropic dose plans for Capri with 1/4,<br />
1/2, 3/4 treatment sectors were designed with sparing structures at<br />
0.5cm to 1cm depth from Capri surface on the opposite 1/4 sectors<br />
(OAR) (Figure 1). Reference plan with isotropic dose distribution with<br />
central lumen activated only (C) was also created. Planning target<br />
volume (PTV) was defined as 0.5cm depth from the surface <strong>of</strong> Capri<br />
enclosed within the treatment sector. Capri applicators sizes were<br />
varied by injecting 30cc, 40cc and 60cc water which corresponding to<br />
diameters 3.5cm, 3.7 cm and 4.2cm respectively. Plans were done<br />
with different configurations <strong>of</strong> activated lumens within the<br />
treatment sector, with lumens only in the outer ring (O), or only in<br />
the middle ring (M), or combination <strong>of</strong> outer and middle ring (OM).<br />
Planning goal was to minimize PTV(V150) and OAR(2cc) with D90 <strong>of</strong><br />
PTV > 90%. Doses to points A, B and C, which was located in the<br />
sparing structure at the surface, 0.5 cm and 1.0 cm depth <strong>of</strong> the Capri<br />
respectively, were calculated for all plans. The ratio <strong>of</strong> doses to those<br />
points from anisotropic plans to the reference plan was defined as<br />
effective transmission (ET).<br />
: The ET depends on the treatment sector length and the<br />
location <strong>of</strong> activated lumens. It varied from 0.2, 0.4 and 0.7 for 1/4,<br />
1/2 and 3/4 treatment sector, respectively. The dose to OAR strongly<br />
correlates to ET. They are 20%, 40% and 60% <strong>of</strong> the prescribed dose<br />
for 1/4, 1/2 and 3/4 treatment sector, respectively. PTV(V150),<br />
however, is inversely correlated to ET. PTV (V150) varied from close<br />
to 25%, higher than 15% and less than 15% for ¼, 1/2 and 3/4<br />
treatment sectors, respectively. With same treatment sector length,<br />
plans with OM lumens can reduce PTV (V150) by 5% but with increased<br />
OAR dose by 2% compared with plans with O loading. For OM loading,<br />
middle lumen could be weighted more heavily to reduce high dose to<br />
vagina mucosa without increasing too much dose to OAR. For 1/4<br />
treatment sector, plan with middle lumen only could reduce<br />
PTV(V150) in vaginal mucosa.<br />
: Postoperative endometrial brachytherapy using Capri<br />
applicator can optimize anisotropic dose distribution by using variable<br />
configuration <strong>of</strong> lumens. A combination <strong>of</strong> outer ring and middle ring<br />
planning model provides tolerable dose to mucosa <strong>of</strong> vagina, good<br />
coverage to vaginal treatment depth, and the best dose sparing at<br />
normal tissue.<br />
PO304<br />
EVALUATION OF 3D MRI CUBE TECHNIQUE FOR HDR CERVICAL CANCER<br />
TREATMENT<br />
H. Kim 1 , C. Houser 1 , S. Beriwal 1<br />
1<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology,<br />
Pittsburg PA, USA<br />
: Recently 3D image guided high dose rate (HDR)<br />
brachytherapy for cervical cancer treatment has been quickly evolved<br />
by using either CT or MRI images. Gold standard for the treatment<br />
planning is to use MRI images for each fraction <strong>of</strong> treatment due to<br />
the superior quality in accurate target delineation. However, MRI scan<br />
for HDR brachytherapy has not been popular because <strong>of</strong> the limitation<br />
<strong>of</strong> access to the scanner, the longer scan acquisition time than CT and<br />
longer planning time due to difficulty in reconstruction <strong>of</strong> applicators.<br />
Newly introduced 3D MRI CUBE sequence technique has been<br />
implemented to the MRI scanners and it <strong>of</strong>fers a 3D high definition and<br />
better resolution with a shorter total scan time. We compared total<br />
scan time, visualization and reconstruction <strong>of</strong> applicator in the<br />
treatment planning with MR CUBE technique to the planning with<br />
conventional MR images.<br />
: 20 cervical cancer patients who were treated<br />
with MRI based plan using HDR Ring and Tandem applicator were<br />
analyzed. All patients had 5 fractions after external beam was<br />
completed and each HDR fraction was replanned for treatment with<br />
Nucletron Plato 14.5 system. Ten patients had MRI scans using
S<strong>12</strong>2 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
conventional method <strong>of</strong> T2 true axial with 5.0mm slice spacing and<br />
the other <strong>10</strong> patients had scans with T2 CUBE by 2mm spacing and<br />
reformatted to 0.8mm spacing in true axial slices. Xray film based<br />
plans were taken as reference plans for reconstruction <strong>of</strong> applicators<br />
for each fraction for all patients. Total <strong>10</strong>0 fractions were analyzed.<br />
Reference plan was generated based on orthogonal Xray films by<br />
digitizing the dummy seed markers inside applicators and prescribing<br />
dose to point A. MRI based plan was generated by tracking the<br />
applicator shape using coordinates <strong>of</strong> applicator and dwell positions in<br />
a reference plan. Comparisons between reference plan and MR based<br />
plans were involved as following: i) overall conventional and cube MR<br />
scan time , ii) dwell time for weighting 1.0 and iii) geometrical source<br />
dwell position coordinate.<br />
: Total scan time was 30 minutes and 8 minutes for<br />
conventional and CUBE technique respectively. Dwell time variation<br />
was 1.9 to 8.1% with a SD <strong>of</strong> 3.6% and 0.1 to 3.0% with a SD <strong>of</strong> 0.9% for<br />
conventional MR and CUBE sequence respectively. Variations from the<br />
reference plan in applicator reconstruction showed 1.8 mm with a<br />
standard deviation (SD) <strong>of</strong> 0.8 mm and 1.1mm with a SD <strong>of</strong> 0.5 mm for<br />
ring and tandem applicator respectively in conventional MR image. In<br />
T2 CUBE image, variation was 0.7 mm with SD <strong>of</strong> 0.4 mm and 0.3 mm<br />
with SD <strong>of</strong> 0.2 mm for ring and tandem applicator respectively.<br />
: MRI CUBE scan provides shorter scan acquisition time,<br />
better accuracy <strong>of</strong> applicator reconstruction in the planning with high<br />
resolution. It can help utilizing MRI based planning for HDR cervical<br />
cancer treatment and will improve the quality <strong>of</strong> planning process.<br />
PO305<br />
3D BALANCED STEADYSTATE FREE PRECESSION (3DBSSFP) MRI<br />
INTERSTITIAL CATHETER IDENTIFICATION<br />
A. Viswanathan 1 , T. Kapur 2 , A. Damato 1 , E. Schmidt 2<br />
1<br />
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Boston, USA<br />
2<br />
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology, Boston,<br />
USA<br />
: To determine the utility <strong>of</strong> a 3DbSSFP Magnetic<br />
Resonance (MR) sequence to identify interstitial catheters after<br />
insertion used for gynecologic interstitial brachytherapy in an MR<br />
environment<br />
: A pressing problem in MRguided interstitial<br />
brachytherapy is difficulty with precisely locating the catheters during<br />
the insertion process. Therefore, we sought to identify an MR<br />
sequence which could be used to reproducibly identify each catheter<br />
after insertion. A series <strong>of</strong> 3 patients underwent MRguided catheter<br />
placement in a multimodality operating room with a 3 Tesla MR<br />
scanner used for intraoperative visualization <strong>of</strong> the tumor and<br />
interstitial catheters. In order to visualize and distinguish the<br />
catheters from each other, multiple contrast MR sequences (3DbSSFP,<br />
3DFSE, 3DGRE) were acquired. After the first catheter was inserted,<br />
a 3DbSSFP scan was performed in the sagittal plan, and an attempt<br />
made to identify the tip <strong>of</strong> the catheter. After a series <strong>of</strong><br />
modifications to reduce the size <strong>of</strong> the ballooning at the tip, an ideal<br />
sequence was developed. Subsequently, additional catheters were<br />
inserted and scanned using this sequence, and catheters were<br />
identified as unique entities using the images obtained. Needle<br />
positions were compared to CTbased identification <strong>of</strong> the needles.<br />
: A sequence using 3DbSSFP in a 3 Tesla MR scan was<br />
identified as the best sequence for catheter identifications with<br />
ballooning artifact at the tip. It was confirmed on CT and showed<br />
accurate placement (Figure). The needleartifact size, shaped as a<br />
cross centered on the needle, was controlled by changing the 3D<br />
bSSFP bandwidth and repetitiontime (TR). Best results were achieved<br />
with TR/TE/θ=4.6 ms/2.3 ms/30 0 , bandwidth= 600 Hz/pixel,<br />
0.9x0.9x1.6 mm 3 resolution, 160 mm superiorinferior coverage, 1.2<br />
minutes/acquisition. The most accurate identification was confirmed<br />
with this optimized 3DbSSFPP series, with the 3DGRE signaltonoise<br />
ratio being lower; an equivalentresolution 3DFSE required 5minute<br />
scans. Accurate identification <strong>of</strong> the catheter tip during the insertion<br />
process allows proper placement and ensures that catheters are not<br />
unintentionally inserted into the normal tissue structures.<br />
: A novel sequence for MR catheter identification is<br />
proposed and validated in a clinical series <strong>of</strong> patients undergoing<br />
interstitial catheter placement for gynecologic brachytherapy.<br />
PO306<br />
FROM 2D RADIOGRAPHBASED TO 3D CTBASED PLANNING IN CERVICAL<br />
CANCER BRACHYTHERAPY WARSAW EXPERIENCE<br />
M. Dabkowski 1 , M. Kawczynska 2 , A. ZolciakSiwinska 1 , E.<br />
Gruszczynska 2 , B. Czyzew 2<br />
1<br />
The Maria SklodowskaCurie Memorial Cancer Center, Department <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Warsaw, Poland<br />
2<br />
The Maria SklodowskaCurie Memorial Cancer Center, Medical<br />
Physics Department, Warsaw, Poland<br />
: To investigate the differences in dose distribution<br />
between twodimensional radiographbased planning and three<br />
dimensional CTbased planning in cervical cancer brachytherapy.<br />
: We investigated 160 HDR brachytherapy plans<br />
from two groups <strong>of</strong> patients treated at our deparment for cervical<br />
cancer stages IBIIIB. The first group consisted <strong>of</strong> 20 consecutive<br />
patients treated with 2D HDR brachytherapy, with dose prescription to<br />
point A. In the second group <strong>of</strong> 20 successive patients a 3D CTbased<br />
approach was used with dose prescription to target volume. In both<br />
groups the ICRU Report 38 recommendations were used for reporting<br />
the dose distribution. For each patient we analyzed 4 plans (one plan<br />
for every fraction).<br />
: The analysis revealed moderate to significant differences<br />
between 2D and 3Dbased planning in terms <strong>of</strong> dose distribution. CT<br />
based treatment planning resulted in lower volumes <strong>of</strong> prescribed<br />
isodose, lower doses to points A, B, rectal and bladder points.<br />
: 3D CTbased brachytherapy planning with dose<br />
prescription to target volume results in significantly lower treatment<br />
volumes. Further clinical follow up is needed for evaluation <strong>of</strong> clinical<br />
relevance <strong>of</strong> new treatment planning method in terms <strong>of</strong> local control<br />
and acute and late toxicity.<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S <strong>12</strong>3<br />
PO307<br />
RESULTS OF CT BASED BRACHYTHERAPY PLANNING FOR IIBIVA<br />
CERVICAL CANCER PATIENTS<br />
M. Garipagaoglu 1 , E.T. Tezcanli 1 , M. Sengoz 1 , O. Senkesen 1 , H.<br />
Kucucuk 1 , E.O. Goksel 1 , M. Yilmaz 1 , I. Aslay 2<br />
1 Acibadem University Med, Radiation Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey<br />
2 Istanbul University, Oncology Institute, Istanbul, Turkey<br />
: To evaluate the treatment results and morbidity<br />
<strong>of</strong> stage IIBIVA cervical carcinoma patients treated with combination<br />
<strong>of</strong> external radiotherapy (ERT) and 3 dimensional (3D) high dose rate<br />
(HDR) brachytherapy (BT).<br />
: Thirtyseven cervical carcinoma patients with<br />
inoperable stage IIBIVA, tumor size ≥5cm, treated between July 2005<br />
December 20<strong>10</strong> were included. 3D conformal technique was used for<br />
pelvic ERT to total doses <strong>of</strong> 4550Gy, parametrial boost was added for<br />
selected cases. Paraaortic ERT performed using simultaneous<br />
integrated boost technique with macroscopic disease receiving 60 Gy<br />
was used for 8 patients. Median BT fraction dose was 6 Gy (58) Gy<br />
and fraction number was 5 (35). Concurrent 40mg/m 2 <strong>of</strong> weekly<br />
cisplatin was administered during ERT. BT was started at least after<br />
completion <strong>of</strong> 4 th week <strong>of</strong> ERT. Computerized tomography (CT) and<br />
magnetic resonance (MR) compatible applicators were used. CT<br />
images were taken after the placement <strong>of</strong> applicators and 3D<br />
brachytherapy planning (BTP) was performed. Beside CT images, MR<br />
images were obtained for selected patients. Targets such as residual<br />
GTV, high risk CTV (HRCTV) and intermediate risk CTV (IRCTV) and<br />
OARs namely rectum (R) and bladder (B) were delineated. 3D BTP,<br />
dose calculation and optimizations (manual and volume) were<br />
performed considering target and OAR doses. According to our in<br />
house protocol 90% <strong>of</strong> HRCTV were required to receive prescription<br />
dose (PD) and D2cc for B and R needed to be less than 80% <strong>of</strong> PD.<br />
Treatment was done using HDR Varisource 200 device containing Ir 192<br />
sources. Patients were followed up with 3 month intervals. The effect<br />
<strong>of</strong> stage, tumor size, ERT dose, BT fraction and total dose, residual<br />
tumor size after ERT, left and right point A doses, V<strong>10</strong>0 and D90 for<br />
GTV to local control and survival were studied. Moreover the relation<br />
<strong>of</strong> toxicity and dosevolume parameters such as ICRU38 R, percent and<br />
absolute R volume receiving PD and 80%<strong>of</strong> PD, rectal length receiving<br />
80%PD, D2cc, D1cc, D0.1 cc for rectum and mean rectal doses were<br />
investigated.<br />
: All patients completed the planned treatment receiving<br />
median 5 (46) times weekly cisplatin. Stage distribution was IIB: 21,<br />
IIIA: 2, IIIB: 7, IVA: 7 patients and median largest tumor diameter was<br />
5.6 (5 11) cm. After completion <strong>of</strong> ERT, measured median GTV<br />
volume was 3.9 (067) cc. Five year local control and survival for<br />
whole group and IIB were 87% 66.3% and 95% 90% respectively.<br />
Stage was the only significant factor for both local control and<br />
survival. No bladder toxicity was observed. However, chronic rectal<br />
toxicity was seen in 5 patients (Grade 3 in 2 patients, grade2 in 2<br />
patients and grade1 in 1 patient). No relation between dose volume<br />
parameters and rectal side effects was found.<br />
: Although, 3D BTP provided better local control and<br />
survival, the patients with large tumor size and advanced stage<br />
disease failed to show improvement in rectal toxicity.<br />
PO308<br />
HDR BRT IN ENDOMETRIAL CANCER: EXPERIENCE OF TWO<br />
FRACTIONATION SCHEDULES AND RESULTS OF 14 YEARS WITH 57<br />
PATIENTS<br />
S. Gribaudo 1 , M. Tessa 2 , E. Madon 3 , V. Richetto 3 , D. Masenga 4 , U.<br />
Monetti 1 , A. Mussano 1 , A. Urgesi 1 , D. Nassisi 2 , S. Cosma 5<br />
1<br />
O.I.R.M. S. Anna Hospital, Radiotherapy, Torino, Italy<br />
2<br />
Cardinal Massaia Hospital, Radiotherapy, Asti, Italy<br />
3<br />
O.I.R.M. S. Anna Hospital, Physics, Torino, Italy<br />
4<br />
Cardinal Massaia Hospital, Physics, Asti, Italy<br />
5<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Turin, Gynecology, Torino, Italy<br />
: Endometrial cancer is the mainly gynecologic<br />
malignancy that is, in 8085%, in stage I at the time <strong>of</strong> diagnosis. The<br />
standard primary treatment for early stage endometrial cancer<br />
remains TAH&BSO, with appropriate surgical staging. The<br />
epidemiology <strong>of</strong> this disease favours elderly, obese women with<br />
multiple medical problems (hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular<br />
diseases, coagulation disorders, respiratory disorders) that render<br />
some <strong>of</strong> them medically inoperable. Radiation alone is the only<br />
efficient option for these women. <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> is the main<br />
component <strong>of</strong> radiation management in this cohort <strong>of</strong> patients.<br />
: Staging was based on clinical examination,<br />
TVUS, MR or CT scan and fractionated curettage. From September<br />
1997, to July 2011, 57 patients were treated with BRT HDR alone. The<br />
median age was 79 years (range 5793). There were 19 patients in<br />
Stage Ia, 35 in Stage Ib, and 3 in Stage II. Overall, diseasespecific<br />
survival, local control and late side effects were analyzed<br />
retrospectively. Followup over <strong>10</strong> years (mean 52 months) is<br />
reported. BRT HDR was performed with Rotte endometrial 'Y'<br />
applicator and in stage II by adding an endovaginal cylinder<br />
applicator. Dose prescription: we use ‘‘uterine points’’ that are two<br />
points located 1 cm over the centre <strong>of</strong> a line drawn between the tips<br />
<strong>of</strong> the two ends <strong>of</strong> the Rotte applicator and a series <strong>of</strong> points placed<br />
laterally to the tandem according to the pretreatment imaging data.<br />
The entire length <strong>of</strong> the uterus was treated so as to ensure coverage<br />
<strong>of</strong> the fund. TPS optimization was performed to maintain the bladder<br />
and rectal maximum point doses below <strong>10</strong>0% <strong>of</strong> the prescribed dose;<br />
the same plan was used for each fraction <strong>of</strong> treatment. From 1997 to<br />
2002 BRT was performed four to five times (weekly) and mean dose<br />
was 29 Gy (range 1835 Gy); from 2003 (30 patients) we deliver 30 Gy<br />
in five fractions <strong>of</strong> 6 Gy each b.i.d. schedule, 6 hours interval<br />
between fractions.<br />
: At 5 years, overall survival, diseasespecific survival, and<br />
local control were 47.4%, 86%, and 89.5% (Stage Ia: 50%, 86.4%, and<br />
90.9%; Stage Ib: 46.9%, 87.5%, and 90.6%; and Stage II: 33.3%, 66.7%,<br />
and 66.7%). Disease specific survival was not affected by tumour<br />
grade or age. The local control rate is related to the size <strong>of</strong> the uterus<br />
but not to the tumour grading. One patient showed progressive<br />
disease, 6 (<strong>10</strong>,6%) developed recurrence after a median <strong>of</strong> 13 months<br />
(3 with distant metastases), 2 (3,5%) developed a lymph node<br />
recurrence with distant metastases. One patient have a GE grade III<br />
late side effect (1.8%) at 5 years, not related with rectal dose.<br />
: At Stages Ia, Ib, and II, HDR BRT with Rotte 'Y' applicator<br />
is a very effective treatment modality with good local control rates<br />
and suitable diseasespecific survival for patients who are not fit for<br />
surgery.This method has proven to have a low risk <strong>of</strong> acute<br />
complications and longterm side effects. Longer followup will be<br />
required to document the incidence <strong>of</strong> late effects using the b.i.d.<br />
fractionated HDR approach. In the short term, it seems that this<br />
approach is a feasible way to limit the number <strong>of</strong> procedural<br />
complications and length <strong>of</strong> hospital stay and bed rest.<br />
PO309<br />
DOSIMETRIC IMPACT OF INTERFRACTION CATHETER MOVEMENT IN MRI<br />
CT GUIDED HDR INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY FOR GYN CANCER<br />
F. Rey 1 , C. Chang 1 , C. Mesina 1 , N. Dixit 1 , K. Teo 1 , L. Lin 1<br />
1 University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, USA<br />
: To determine the dosimetric impact <strong>of</strong> catheter<br />
movement for MRI/CT image guided high dose rate (HDR) interstitial<br />
brachytherapy (ISBT) for gynecologic cancers and investigate feasible<br />
alternatives for optimal dose delivery.<br />
: Between January and September 2011, 8<br />
patients were treated with HDR ISBT using the SyedNeblett template.<br />
Disease sites included: cervical (4), vaginal (2), vulvar (1), and<br />
endometrial (1). All patients received EBRT (median 50.4 Gy). Needles<br />
were placed according to a preplan based on CTV assessment using<br />
MRI and CT. The Eclipse treatment planning system and the Varian<br />
GammaMedPlus ix were used for planning and delivery, respectively.<br />
The CTV and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk were contoured and the catheters were<br />
digitized using a postimplant MRI and CT. The prescribed dose was<br />
3.75 – 4 Gy per fraction for a total <strong>of</strong> 5 fractions delivered twice daily<br />
on 3 consecutive days with a single implantation. Planning goals were<br />
a dose homogeneity index ≥ 0.65 and CTV D90 ≥ 90%. The treatment<br />
plan for the first fraction was created and delivered on day 1 (d1). An<br />
MRI and CT were performed prior to the second and fourth fraction.<br />
All image sets were coregistered to the initial CT and MRI. The CTV <strong>of</strong><br />
the d1 MRI was transferred, OARs were drawn and catheters were<br />
digitized on the d2 and d3 CT. Three scenarios were modeled. 1) The<br />
d1 plan (same dwell positions/times) was applied to the d2 and d3 CT,<br />
using the updated catheter positions and compared to the d1 plan. 2)
S<strong>12</strong>4 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
Based on the same optimization objectives <strong>of</strong> the d1 plan, replanning<br />
was performed with the actual catheter positions for d2 and d3.<br />
Dosimetry was analyzed for each plan and compared to the d1 dose<br />
distribution. 3) We further applied the dwell positions/times from the<br />
d2 replan over the d3 CT and compared the dosimetric goals with a d3<br />
CT replan.<br />
: 1) When we used the d1 plan on the d2 and d3 CT with the<br />
updated catheter positions, the mean CTV V<strong>10</strong>0 decreased from 83.7%<br />
to 80.1% (p=0.16) and 79.2% (p=0.03), respectively. The coverage <strong>of</strong><br />
the mean CTV D90 was reduced from 92.3% on d1 to 88.9% (p=0.19) on<br />
d2 and to 87.5% (p=0.009) on d3. 2) The replanning on d2 and d3<br />
compensated for catheter movement with no significant difference<br />
with the initial plan, mean CTV V<strong>10</strong>0 <strong>of</strong> 85% (p=0.25) and D90 <strong>of</strong> 94.2%<br />
(p=0.<strong>12</strong>) on d2 and V<strong>10</strong>0 <strong>of</strong> 84.5% (p=0.3) and D90 <strong>of</strong> 92.7% (p=0.76)<br />
on d3. 3) When we compared the replan <strong>of</strong> d2 applied on the d3 CT vs<br />
the d3 replan, there was no significant difference in coverage, V<strong>10</strong>0<br />
<strong>of</strong> 82% (p=0.22) and D90 <strong>of</strong> 89.7% (p=0.25).<br />
: Interfraction catheter movement significantly decreases<br />
the CTV coverage over 3 days, compromising CTV coverage for the<br />
fourth and fifth fractions. Rather than replanning on both days prior<br />
to treatment, replanning on the day 2 CT for day 3 treatment would<br />
give an optimal solution that would compensate for interfraction<br />
catheter displacement. This is a feasible and time effective technique<br />
using a single replanning.<br />
PO3<strong>10</strong><br />
CLINICAL FEASIBILITY OF COBALT 60 HDR INTRACAVITARY<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY IN CARCINOMA CERVIX : A PRELIMINARY REPORT<br />
A. Basu 1 , S. Basu 1 , K. Ghosh 1 , S.N. Mullick 1 , S. Datta 1<br />
1<br />
R.G. Kar Medical College Kolkata, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />
Oncology, Kolkata, India<br />
: 60 Co sources with identical dimensions to 192 Ir<br />
have recently been made available for use in HDR brachytherapy. We<br />
present one <strong>of</strong> the first clinical data <strong>of</strong> our initial single institutional<br />
experience with 60 Co HDR remote afterloading brachytherapy in<br />
gynaecological malignancies.<br />
: Patients <strong>of</strong> locally advanced carcinoma cervix<br />
were accrued for this single institutional prospective observational<br />
study to test the clinical feasibility and safety <strong>of</strong> using 60 Co HDR<br />
brachytherapy. All patients were more than 18 years <strong>of</strong> age and had<br />
biopsy proven squamous cell ca cervix (FIGO stage IIB – IVA). They had<br />
normal baseline hematological, biochemical and renal pr<strong>of</strong>ile and<br />
ECOG PS 0 or 1. They received upfront EBRT <strong>of</strong> 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions<br />
over 5.5 weeks to the pelvis using standard portals with weekly Inj.<br />
Cisplatin 40 mg/m 2 . All patients then received HDR intracavitary<br />
brachytherapy with the Multisource remote afterloading machine<br />
using 60 Co source and the HDR Plus s<strong>of</strong>tware v2.6 (Eckert & Ziegler<br />
BEBIG GmbH, Germany). All fractions were planned using CT imaging.<br />
Planning parameters mandated dose prescription to point A. Dose<br />
cut<strong>of</strong>fs <strong>of</strong> < 75 Gy EQD2 to 2cc volumes <strong>of</strong> rectum and sigmoid colon<br />
and < 90 Gy EQD2 to 2cc volume <strong>of</strong> bladder were aimed for and the<br />
D90 HRCTV and D90 IRCTV were planned to receive > 87 Gy and > 60<br />
Gy. Treatment was planned to be completed within 8 weeks. Initial<br />
response and toxicity were assessed.<br />
: From October 20<strong>10</strong> to December 2011, 167 patients <strong>of</strong><br />
carcinoma cervix were treated at our centre. The median age was 54<br />
years (range 28 – 76 yrs). Majority <strong>of</strong> the patients were in FIGO stage<br />
IIIB (63%). 93% <strong>of</strong> patients received chemoradiation and majority (84%)<br />
completed treatment on time. Most <strong>of</strong> the patients (88%) received 9<br />
Gy in 2 fractions to point A. CT based planning was done for all<br />
fractions and GTV B, HRCTV and IRCTV were delineated using clinical<br />
findings and / or T2w MR imaging. The median EQD2 for D90 HRCTV<br />
was 88 Gy (range 67.3 – <strong>12</strong>4.7 Gy) and D90 IRCTV was 65.5 Gy (range<br />
50 – 92.9 Gy). The median EQD2 for D2cc Rectum was 71.9 Gy (range<br />
54.3 – 85.2 Gy), D2cc Bladder was 80.75 Gy (range 54– <strong>10</strong>9.4 Gy) and<br />
D2cc Sig Col was 65.85 Gy (range 49.1 – 85.1 Gy). The acute toxicity<br />
was acceptable and no G3 or higher acute bladder or bowel toxicities<br />
were noted. Till January 15 th , 20<strong>12</strong>, there have been no locoregional<br />
failures and only 2 late rectal toxicities (bleeding), both <strong>of</strong> whom<br />
received D2cc rectal doses > 85 Gy EQD2.<br />
: HDR brachytherapy using 60 Co sources for carcinoma<br />
cervix is clinically feasible and safe with favourable short term<br />
response and toxicity, comparable to historical data using 192 Ir. This<br />
represents a viable option for HDR brachytherapy with added benefits<br />
<strong>of</strong> lower constraints on logistics, resources and perhaps cost because<br />
<strong>of</strong> the longer half life <strong>of</strong> 60 Co. However, larger studies with more<br />
number <strong>of</strong> patients and long term follow up are required in future.<br />
<br />
PO311<br />
HDRAFTERLOADING FOR BREAST IORT USING A BALLOON CATHETER<br />
APPLICATOR<br />
U. Schleicher 1 , E. Bosch 1 , W. Hürter 1 , L. Paas 2 , M. Türker 2<br />
1<br />
Strahlentherapie GP DürenMechernich, Strahlentherapie Düren,<br />
Düren, Germany<br />
2<br />
Krankenhaus Düren, Gynaecology, Düren, Germany<br />
: We developed an intraoperative treatment for<br />
breast cancer using an HDR brachytherapy unit with 192Iridium and a<br />
balloon catheter with a single therapy lumen.<br />
: From February to December 2011, we treated<br />
40 patients aged 36 to 85 (median 62) years by intraoperative HDR<br />
afterloading brachytherapy intended as a tumour bed boost.<br />
Preoperative indication for boost irradiation was G2 or G3<br />
differentiation in the biopsy specimen. Patients were eligible for the<br />
method with cT1 (n=31) or small cT2 (n=9) tumours, no<br />
multicentricity, and a skintumourdistance <strong>of</strong> > 1.5 cm. After tumour<br />
excision and balloon catheter implantation (filling volumes 3550 ml,<br />
median 35 ml) into the tumour bed, the wound is temporarily closed<br />
with close adaptation <strong>of</strong> tissue to the balloon, leaving only the<br />
connecting catheter outside, and covered with sterile transparent<br />
drape. Accompanied by breast surgeon and anaesthesiologist, the<br />
patient is transferred in anaesthesia to the brachytherapy unit, and<br />
treated with an applicator surface dose <strong>of</strong> 20 Gy using standard plans<br />
calculated for different applicator volumes. Skin dose close to the<br />
applicator is monitored by in vivo dosimetry. After treatment, the<br />
patient is brought back to the operation theatre, the applicator is<br />
removed and oncoplastic surgery finished. Percutaneous whole breast<br />
radiotherapy was started 33 to 63 (median 42) days after IORT in<br />
patients not receiving chemotherapy. In the case histology reveals<br />
indications for chemotherapy whole breast radiotherapy is done<br />
thereafter.<br />
: Prolongation <strong>of</strong> anaesthesia due to irradiation time and<br />
transport was 40 minutes in mean. Balloon volumes ranged from 3550<br />
ml, resulting in 8.89.5 Gy in 1cm depth. Measured skin dose ranged<br />
from 1.381 to 8.8 Gy. Acute and subacute side effects were mild to<br />
moderate and consisted mainly in erythema, oedema or induration <strong>of</strong><br />
the surgical site. Major haematoma leading to intervention or<br />
infection was not observed. Incidence <strong>of</strong> seroma was not higher than<br />
usual. Four patients withdrew their consent to percutaneous therapy<br />
after IORT and thus received no further treatment. During further<br />
followup, no difference in toxicity was seen compared to<br />
percutaneous 3Dplanned boost after whole breast radiotherapy.<br />
: This IORT method is easily feasible and does not lead to<br />
severe specific side effects. Being an IORT procedure, it avoids<br />
geographic miss <strong>of</strong> the tumour bed. In patients receiving<br />
chemotherapy, the IORT boost <strong>of</strong> 20 Gy may lead to better local<br />
control. The structural requirements (architecture, brachytherapy<br />
unit) given, it <strong>of</strong>fers the possibility <strong>of</strong> breast IORT for departments<br />
with small numbers <strong>of</strong> eligible patients on a pay per performance<br />
basis (only the patientdependent cost <strong>of</strong> the catheters).<br />
PO3<strong>12</strong><br />
OUTCOME OF TRIPLE NEGATIVE (TN) BREAST CARCINOMA AFTER<br />
BREAST CONSERVATION WITH RADIOTHERAPY<br />
U. Masood 1 , M. Bukhari 2 , A. Masood 1 , I. Haider 1 , T. Mehmood 1 , A.<br />
Muhammad 1 , M. Shah 1 , A. Rasheed 1<br />
1<br />
Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre,<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Lahore, Pakistan<br />
2<br />
Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre,<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Surgical Oncology, Lahore, Pakistan<br />
: Triplenegative (TN) breast cancer, by definition<br />
estrogenreceptor, progesteronereceptor and HER2 negative, does<br />
not have as many treatment options as other breast cancers. The<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S <strong>12</strong>5<br />
current study was performed to determine the relationship <strong>of</strong> breast<br />
conservation with radiotherapy in TN breast cancer.<br />
: Total <strong>10</strong>9 triple negative breast cancer<br />
women underwent breast conservation (WLE, lumpectomy,<br />
quadrentectomy) followed by radiation 60GY in 30 fraction<br />
(200cGy/day 5 days a week). Chemotherapy was given either in neo<br />
adjuvant or adjuvant setting in all patients<br />
: Median follow up after treatment was 36months.Median age<br />
<strong>of</strong> the patients was 43 years (2673). 90% patients were early stage<br />
and <strong>10</strong> % were locally advanced while 62% were node negative and<br />
38% were node positive. Locoregional recurrence was seen in only<br />
3.7% patients (total 3, chest wall 1) while Distant metastasis was seen<br />
in 22.9% patients. At 4.38 years Kaplan Meier estimated disease free<br />
survival was 54% and overall survival was 81%.<br />
: Patients with TN breast cancer are not at significantly<br />
increased risk for isolated LRR at 5years so remain appropriate<br />
candidates for breast conservation. There is increased risk <strong>of</strong> distant<br />
failure even in early stage disease associated with poor disease free<br />
survival .Targeted therapies are required in clinical trials to find new<br />
and better ways to treat it.<br />
PO313<br />
EVALUATION OF IN VIVO DOSIMETRY IN BREAST CANCER<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY USING MOSFET DETECTORS<br />
D. Nahajowski 1 , E. Byrski 1 , R. Kudzia 1 , D. Dybek 1 , A. Dziecichowicz 1 ,<br />
T. Dabrowski 1 , A. Kukielka 1<br />
1<br />
Centre <strong>of</strong> Oncology Institute MSC Kraków, Cancer Centre, Krakow,<br />
Poland<br />
To evaluate MOSFET detectorbased in vivo skin<br />
dose in breast cancer brachytherapy performed using the Breast<br />
Template Set TM (Nucletron) needle applicator technique.<br />
: In vivo measurements, using TN502 RDM<br />
(Best Medical System) MOSFET detectors were made for 81 female<br />
patients undergoing breast cancer brachytherapy by the Breast<br />
Template Set (NUCLETRON) needle applicator technique. Prior to<br />
patient exposure using the NUCLETRON MicroSelectron HDR system,<br />
the MOSFET detectors were positioned between the templates and<br />
breast skin at two locations, shown in Fig. 1: at the tipend template,<br />
and at the connectorend template, in both cases along the inner<br />
(transfer tube) sides <strong>of</strong> the templates. Calibration <strong>of</strong> the MOSFET<br />
detectors was performed in a breast fantom made <strong>of</strong> bolus gel,<br />
specially prepared to imitate the clinical conditions. Values <strong>of</strong><br />
absorbed dose measured by these detectors were compared with<br />
values calculated at the detector positions by the PLATO TPS<br />
(NUCLETRON).<br />
<br />
: The mean absolute difference between 81 pairs <strong>of</strong> measured<br />
and planned dose values were 2.1% ± 5.9% (1 SD), for the tip end<br />
location and 1.2% ± 6.0% (1 SD) for the connector end location. The<br />
observed differences between the MOSFETmeasured and TPSplanned<br />
dose values may be due to uncertainties in measuring the needle<br />
lengths, instability <strong>of</strong> MOSFET detectors, inaccuracies <strong>of</strong> detector<br />
calibration and inaccuracies in the TPS calculations <strong>of</strong> the planned<br />
dose at detector locations.<br />
: The described method <strong>of</strong> MOSFETbased in vivo<br />
dosimetry applied in breast brachytherapy, by providing an<br />
adequately accurate evaluation <strong>of</strong> dose delivered to the breast skin, is<br />
able to effectively assess the dose delivered to the target area.<br />
PO314<br />
PRESCRIPTION DOSE EVALUATION FOR APBI WITH NONINVASIVE<br />
BREAST BRACHYTHERAPY USING EQUIVALENT UNIFORM DOSE<br />
K.L. Leonard 1 , D.E. Wazer 2 , M.J. Rivard 1 , S. Sioshansi 3 , J.R. Hiatt 4 ,<br />
C.S. Melhus 1 , J.T. Hepel 4<br />
1<br />
Tufts Medical Center Tufts University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Radiation<br />
Oncology, Boston MA, USA<br />
2<br />
Tufts Medical Center Tufts University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine and Rhode<br />
Island Hospital Warren Alpert School <strong>of</strong> Medicine <strong>of</strong> Brown University,<br />
Radiation Oncology, Boston MA and Providence RI, USA<br />
3<br />
UMass Memorial Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Worcester MA,<br />
USA<br />
4<br />
Rhode Island Hospital Warren Alpert School <strong>of</strong> Medicine <strong>of</strong> Brown<br />
University, Radiation Oncology, Providence RI, USA<br />
: A Phase I/II APBI trial using a noninvasive breast<br />
brachytherapy device (NIBB) was initiated. Calculations <strong>of</strong> equivalent<br />
uniform dose (EUD) were performed to identify the appropriate NIBB<br />
dose.<br />
: APBI plans were developed for 24 patients: 5<br />
with 3Dconformal APBI (3DCRT), 5 with multilumen intracavitary<br />
balloons (MIBB), 4 with singlelumen intracavitary balloons using<br />
multiple dwell positions (SMIBB), 5 with singlelumen intracavitary<br />
balloons using a single dwell position (SSIBB), and 5 simulated in the<br />
prone position with compression paddles for both the craniocaudal<br />
(CC) and mediolateral (ML) orientations simulating NIBB treatment<br />
(Figure).<br />
PTV_eval was contoured for 3DCRT and IBB techniques per the NSABP<br />
B39 protocol. For NIBB, PTV_eval was contoured on both the CC and<br />
ML scans and comprised the tumor bed with a 1 cm margin limited by<br />
the chestwall and 5 mm from the skin surface. Prescription doses <strong>of</strong><br />
34 Gy and 38.5 Gy were delivered in <strong>10</strong> fractions for IBB and 3DCRT,<br />
respectively. Prescription doses ranging from 3438.5 Gy were<br />
considered for NIBB, with plans generated using firstgeneration round<br />
applicators in the CC and ML orientations. Dose for each axis<br />
contributed equally to total dose. This method does not model tissue<br />
deformation and composite dosimetry between axes, which may<br />
influence EUD calculations. All plans were generated in Pinnacle<br />
treatment planning systems. DVH data from all 3DCRT, MIBB, and<br />
NIBB plans were used to calculate the biologically effective EUD and<br />
corresponding EUD to the PTV_eval using the following equation: EUD<br />
= EUBED/[n(1 + EUD/α/β)]. EUD was calculated for SSIBB and SMIBB<br />
using the equation EUD = <strong>10</strong>{[v(40BEDtrue/α/β) – <strong>10</strong>]/(20/α/β)}. An α/β<br />
= <strong>10</strong> Gy or 4.6 Gy (as per the START trial) was assumed for breast<br />
tumor. For 3DCRT, generalized EUD (gEUD) was also calculated in<br />
Pinnacle with local control (a = 7.2) as the endpoint. EUDs for varying<br />
NIBB prescription doses were compared to EUDs for the other APBI<br />
techniques.
S<strong>12</strong>6 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
: Mean PTV_eval volume was largest for 3DCRT (454 cm 3 ) and<br />
was similar for NIBB and MIBB (86.8 and 87.2 cm 3 , respectively).<br />
Mean gEUD was similar to calculated EUD for 3DCRT plans (38.8 and<br />
38.4 Gy, respectively). For MIBB, calculated EUD ranged from 33.1 –<br />
40.3 Gy, reflecting differences in treatment plan geometry. Changing<br />
α/β from 4.6 to <strong>10</strong> increased EUD by 2% on average. The Table<br />
displays the mean EUD for each treatment modality.<br />
EUDα/β = <strong>10</strong> (std dev)<br />
3DCRT (38.5 Gy) 38.4 (0.9)<br />
M–IBB (34 Gy) 35.7 (3.0)<br />
SMIBB (34 Gy) 38.0 (0.3)<br />
SS–IB (34 Gy) 38.8 (0.9)<br />
NIBB (34 Gy) 34.1 (0.4)<br />
NIBB (35 Gy) 35.1 (0.4)<br />
NIBB (36 Gy) 35.9 (0.2)<br />
NIBB (37 Gy) 37.0 (0.4)<br />
NIBB (38.5 Gy) 38.5 (0.4)<br />
: For APBI, 3638 Gy prescribed to the <strong>10</strong>0% isodose line<br />
delivered with NIBB using firstgeneration round applicators is the<br />
uniform dose equivalent <strong>of</strong> 34 Gy in <strong>10</strong> fractions delivered with IBB<br />
techniques and <strong>of</strong> 38.5 Gy in <strong>10</strong> fractions delivered with 3DCRT.<br />
Alternatively, 34 Gy with NIBB can be prescribed to the 95% isodose<br />
line.<br />
PO315<br />
CAN WE IMPROVE THE DOSE DISTRIBUTION FOR SINGLE OR MULTI<br />
LUMEN INTERSTITIAL BREAST BALLOON USED FOR APBI?<br />
G. Bieleda 1 , G. Zwierzchowski 1 , A. Chichel 2 , M. Kanikowski 2 , M.<br />
Dymnicka 1 , J. Skowronek 1<br />
1 Great Poland Cancer Centre, Medical Physics, Poznan, Poland<br />
2 Great Poland Cancer Centre, <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Poznan, Poland<br />
: The aim <strong>of</strong> the study was to verify dose<br />
distribution parameters for Contura and artificially created single<br />
lumen balloon applicator application for the same patient using two<br />
optimisation algorithms: Inverse Planning Simulated Annealing (IPSA)<br />
and dose point optimisation with distance option.<br />
: Group <strong>of</strong> 24 patient with Contura multilumen<br />
balloon applied were investigated. Each had tenfraction treatment<br />
with prescribed dose <strong>of</strong> 3.4 Gy per fraction. For every patient 4<br />
treatment plans were prepared. First for fivelumen balloon optimized<br />
with IPSA algorithm, with optimization parameters adjusted for each<br />
case. Second for the same applicator optimized with dose point<br />
optimisation with distant option. Two other plans were prepared for<br />
singlelumen applicator, created by removing four peripheral lumens,<br />
optimized with both algorithms.<br />
: The highest D95 parameter was obtained for plans <strong>of</strong> Contura<br />
patients optimized with IPSA algorithm, mean value 99,32 percent <strong>of</strong><br />
prescribed dose, and it was significantly higher than Contura plans<br />
optimized with dose point algorithm (mean= 83,50%, p
S<strong>12</strong>8 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
:To report five years results with single dose (7 Gy)<br />
HDRBT boost for highrisk breast cancer patients treated with breast<br />
conserving therapy.<br />
: Between June 2005 and December 20<strong>10</strong>, 139<br />
breast cancer patients (pTis: 7,1%, pT1: 66,9%, pT2: 28,4%, pT3: 2,1%)<br />
received a single fraction HDRBT boost after breastconserving<br />
surgery and whole breast external beam radiation therapy (EBRT).<br />
Median age: 53,7 years (range: 2577). Pathologic features:<br />
intraductal carcinoma (6.5%), ductal carcinoma (79.9%), lobulillar<br />
carcinoma (5%), others histologies (8,6%). 33,8 % <strong>of</strong> patients with<br />
infiltrating carcinoma had axillary positive nodes. Mean tumor sized:<br />
16,4 mm. (range:170). Linfovascular invasion: 14.4%. Perineural<br />
invasion: 8.6%. 22.3% <strong>of</strong> patients had grade 3 tumors. After<br />
completion <strong>of</strong> EBRT (median dose 4550 Gy), the patients received a<br />
singlefraction HDRboost <strong>of</strong> 7 Gy, using the Nucletron<br />
(Microselectron) afterloading system. In all patients rigid needles<br />
were used, with a catheter spacing <strong>of</strong> 16 mm.<br />
: At a median followup <strong>of</strong> 54,59 months (range: 1887), 6<br />
patients (4,3 %) with a disease free survival <strong>of</strong> 95,7 %. The overall<br />
survival was 96,4 %. One patient had hematoma at the implant site 8<br />
hours after removal the needles, and required surgery and two<br />
patients had mild fat necrosis, controlled with local treatment,<br />
without needing surgery. There were no other adverse <strong>events</strong>.<br />
: Breast conservation radiation therapy utilizing<br />
interstitial HDRBT boost implant with a single fraction <strong>of</strong> 7 Gy, seems<br />
a safe and well tolerated therapy, have good control local, and have<br />
few late side effects.<br />
PO321<br />
DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON BETWEEN 2D DOSE POINT AND 3D CT BASED<br />
VOLUME OPTIMIZATION IN BREAST BOOST HDR BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
E. Gruszczynska 1 , M. Dabkowski 2 , M. Kawczynska 1 , B. Czyzew 1 , M.<br />
Bijok 1 , A. Kulik 2<br />
1<br />
The Maria SklodowskaCurie Memorial Cancer Center, Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Medical Physics, Warsaw, Poland<br />
2<br />
The Maria SklodowskaCurie Memorial Cancer Center, Department <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Warsaw, Poland<br />
: The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to evaluate differences<br />
between two optimization methods <strong>of</strong> HDR breast boost<br />
brachytherapy planning. In the first method the localization <strong>of</strong> tumor<br />
bed was based only on clinical judgement, with no imaging <strong>of</strong> breast<br />
implant. The dose was prescribed to reference points 5mm from<br />
interstitial needles using dose point optimization (DPO). The second<br />
method is based on CT imaging <strong>of</strong> tumor bed and volume optimization<br />
(VO). These methods are compared in terms <strong>of</strong> conformity and<br />
homogeneity parameters.<br />
: Ten patients treated with HDR boosting <strong>of</strong><br />
breast tumor bed were evaluated. For each patient two separate<br />
plans were prepared. The first plan was based on CT imaging: breast<br />
tumor bed, planning target volume (PTV) and skin were delineated<br />
and volume optimization was used.<br />
In the second plan no imaging was applied and the active length <strong>of</strong><br />
the implant was decided by clinician. The dose was optimized<br />
typically on points 5mm from interstitial needles. For comparing <strong>of</strong><br />
these planning methods the information from 2D planning on CT<br />
images were used for the 3D planning mode. Dosevolume histograms<br />
were calculated for all volumes <strong>of</strong> interest along with conformity and<br />
homogeneity parameters.<br />
: Both optimization methods yielded almost similar dose to the<br />
skin (mean D0.01cc 46 % DPO v. 49% VO). The treated volume<br />
encompassed by the reference isodose using VO was reduced (mean<br />
V<strong>10</strong>0 62cc with DPO vs 39cc with VO, p=0.031 ). Volume optimization<br />
<strong>of</strong>fered better conformity index than DPO (mean CI 17%, p=0.015).<br />
With DPO high dose volumes were for V150 ( mean 18cc with DPO vs<br />
21cc with VO) and V200 (mean 7cc with DPO vs <strong>12</strong>cc with VO). The<br />
mean conformation number CN was 0.23 for DPO vs 0.55 for VO,<br />
p=0.0156. The mean value for DNR for implant was bigger for VO<br />
about 0.23 (p=0.0156).<br />
: CTbased planning with volume optimization <strong>of</strong>fers more<br />
conformal dose distribution and lowers irradiated volumes at the<br />
expense <strong>of</strong> less homogeneous implants. Both methods are good<br />
enough for sparing skin from excessive doses.<br />
PO322<br />
ACCELERATED PARTIAL BREAST IRRADIATION WITH HYBRID<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY APPLICATORS: FAVORABLE OUTCOMES AT FOUR<br />
YEARS<br />
C. Yashar 1 , R.R. Kuske 2 , C.A. Mantz 3 , C.A. Quiet 2 , M.B. Snyder 2 , A.G.<br />
Sadeghi 2 , Y.J. Graves 1 , D. Scanderbeg 1<br />
1<br />
UCSD Moores Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, La Jolla CA, USA<br />
2<br />
Arizona Breast Cancer Specialists, Radiation Oncology, Phoenix AZ,<br />
USA<br />
3<br />
21st Century Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Ft Meyers FL, USA<br />
: Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using<br />
various intracavitary applicators has become increasingly popular.<br />
There are currently a number <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy applicators on the<br />
market for use in treating patients with APBI. However, there is a<br />
need for long term followup with these applicators. A multi<br />
institutional research group, The StrutBased <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> Research<br />
Group, has been formed to study the long term outcomes <strong>of</strong> those<br />
treated with APBI using strutbased applicators. At the time <strong>of</strong><br />
abstract deadline, we present data on 50 women treated at three<br />
institutions using strutbased applicators with median followup <strong>of</strong><br />
approximately 46 months.<br />
: A total <strong>of</strong> 50 patients were treated at 3<br />
institutions with accelerated partial breast irradiation using the hybrid<br />
(nonballoon based) breast brachytherapy device with conventional<br />
dose and fractionation (340 cGy x <strong>10</strong> fractions twice daily). All<br />
patients successfully completed treatment and had no serious adverse<br />
<strong>events</strong> during treatment. Patients were followed regularly and graded<br />
on disease status, cosmesis, hyperpigmentation, seroma, induration,<br />
erythema, fibrosis, telangiectasias, fat necrosis and breast symmetry<br />
based on the CTCAE v3.0 (common terminology critera for adverse<br />
<strong>events</strong>, version 3.0).<br />
: Overall, the strutbased applicator was tolerated well by the<br />
patients and the results are summarized in the chart below.<br />
: With nearly four years <strong>of</strong> median followup the strut<br />
based brachytherapy device appears to be a welltolerated, effective<br />
treatment with minimal acute and few adverse late toxicities,<br />
although followup remains fairly modest. With APBI likely an<br />
acceptable treatment for a proportion <strong>of</strong> women with early breast<br />
cancer, the strutbased device is a facile and versatile device in the<br />
armamentarium.<br />
PO323<br />
COSMETIC OUTCOME AFTER INTRAOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY FOR<br />
EARLY BREAST CANCER IN WOMEN OVER 50 YEARS<br />
N. Williams 1 , M. Keshtgar 1 , T. Corica 2 , C. Saunders 3 , M. Bulsara 4 , D.J.<br />
Joseph 2 , on behalf <strong>of</strong> the TARGIT Trialists' Group 1<br />
1<br />
University College London, Division <strong>of</strong> Surgery and Interventional<br />
Science, London, United Kingdom<br />
2<br />
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Perth,<br />
Australia<br />
3<br />
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Surgery, Perth,<br />
Australia<br />
4<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Notre Dame, Institute <strong>of</strong> Health and Rehabilitation<br />
Research, Fremantle, Australia<br />
: The randomised controlled TARGIT Trial was<br />
designed to determine noninferiority between the novel technique <strong>of</strong><br />
TARGIT [intraoperative radiotherapy with Intrabeam® (Carl Zeiss,<br />
Germany)] and conventional external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in<br />
women with early breast cancer. The main outcome objective is risk<br />
<strong>of</strong> local relapse within the treated breast. We report here data from a<br />
subprotocol assessing cosmesis in 114 women over 50 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />
participating in the TARGIT Trial from one centre (Perth, Australia).<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S <strong>12</strong>9<br />
: Frontal digital photographs from were<br />
assessed, blind to treatment, using specialist s<strong>of</strong>tware (BCCT.core<br />
2.0, INESC Porto, Portugal) which produces a composite score based<br />
on symmetry, colour and scar. Statistical analysis was by generalised<br />
estimating equations (GEE) on all <strong>of</strong> the data, and logistic regression<br />
analysis at year 1.<br />
: 114 patients have been assessed, median age at<br />
randomisation 62 years (IQR 56 to 68). Photographs were taken at<br />
baseline (before surgery) and one, two, three and four years after<br />
initial breast conserving surgery; none had subsequent breast surgery.<br />
The scores were dichotomised into Excellent and Good (EG), and Fair<br />
and Poor (FP). There was a nonsignificant 45% increase in the odds <strong>of</strong><br />
having an outcome <strong>of</strong> EG for patients in the TARGIT group relative to<br />
the EBRT group (OR=1.45, 95%CI 0.78 – 2.69, p=0.245) after adjusting<br />
for tumour size. The results were similar when adjusted for tumour<br />
grade and age <strong>of</strong> the patient. For year 1 only there was a statistically<br />
significant 2.35 fold increase in the odds <strong>of</strong> having an outcome <strong>of</strong> EG<br />
for patients in the TARGIT group relative to the EBRT group (OR=2.35,<br />
95%CI 1.02 – 5.45, p=0.047) after adjusting for age <strong>of</strong> the patient,<br />
tumour size and grade.<br />
: These results confirm a significantly better cosmetic<br />
outcome with TARGIT compared to EBRT in the first year after<br />
surgery.<br />
PO324<br />
CONTRAINDICATIONS TO BREAST INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY AFTER<br />
CONSERVATIVE SURGERY<br />
N. Stas 1<br />
1 Instituto Português de Oncologia, <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Porto, Portugal<br />
: All the patients included were operated at I.P.O.,<br />
Porto or at some <strong>of</strong> the northen refering hospitals, since we're the<br />
only one performing breast interstitial brachytherapy (IBT). As it<br />
refers to a great number <strong>of</strong> patients, and since they were operated<br />
differently before being addressed for IBT, contraindication criteria<br />
must be set in order to get the best benefit for the patients<br />
: During 20<strong>10</strong>, 347 out <strong>of</strong> 432 patients were<br />
treated with a IBT boost <strong>of</strong> the closed tumour bed, with pre and post<br />
operatory mammography, the last one always done at our institution.<br />
IBT boost was performed 1 3 weeks after the end <strong>of</strong> ERT. 649<br />
fractions were distributed as follows: 25 patients treated with PDR<br />
Selectron <strong>of</strong> Nuclétron with a 1520 Gy dose, 0,8 Gy/ hour; 3<strong>12</strong><br />
patients treated with HDR Selectron <strong>of</strong> Nuclétron with 2 x 5 Gy/<strong>12</strong>h.<br />
85 patients were excluded. 25 patients treated with partial IBT were<br />
also excluded, since they have specific contraindications.<br />
: Contraindications (CI): In 20<strong>10</strong>, 85 (19,08%) patients selected<br />
for brachytherapy were excluded. Most <strong>of</strong> these exclusions (3 and 4)<br />
are illustrated with breast photograph and mammography.<br />
1. CI related to the patient general condition<br />
Physical or mental condition occurring after surgery or chemotherapy<br />
2. CI related to the breast pathology<br />
Great extension <strong>of</strong> in situ DC/LC, around limited invasive carcinoma,<br />
multifocal carcinoma in other quadrant<br />
3. CI related to the surgery performed (picture and mammography)<br />
Most patients now desire surgery to be excellent according to<br />
oncological and aesthetical standards in the same operative time,<br />
regardless <strong>of</strong> age. More and more contralateral breast reductions,<br />
breast repositions, and peri nipple, arcuate, sub mammal, T reversed<br />
and almost invisible scars are seen, as well as prosthesis. These<br />
obstacles may be overcome by placing surgical clips in the tumour bed<br />
(f<strong>org</strong>otten in up to 50% <strong>of</strong> the cases) or by tri dimensional<br />
reconstruction on pre and post operative mammography. A number <strong>of</strong><br />
patients had a non complex surgery and a simple scar over the tumour<br />
site. Post operative infections, multipunctured seromas and mammal<br />
celulitis may occur weeks or months after surgery.<br />
4. CI related to the anatomy <strong>of</strong> the operated breast<br />
Lack <strong>of</strong> breast volume. Axilary, supra sternal, sub mammal, sub<br />
clavicular, supra costal locations. All locations where hypodermic<br />
needles and plastic tubes would disturb the patient during the IBT<br />
treatment.<br />
5. Associated different CI<br />
6. Patient refusal<br />
: Early stage breast carcinoma patients represented 13,8%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the patients treated by the Radiotherapy Dpt <strong>of</strong> the I.P.O. Porto, in<br />
20<strong>10</strong>. It was in the 3 and 4 CI groups that we had most difficulties,<br />
and in spite <strong>of</strong> the more frequent usage <strong>of</strong> surgical clips, this is still a<br />
most f<strong>org</strong>otten procedure, that forces us to use reconstruction<br />
imaging techniques like mammography and even MRI which are much<br />
more expensive. In 2011 we had a new Radiotherapy Dpt, new PDR<br />
and HDR Selectrons and new imaging techniques, so that we’ll be able<br />
to work more, always standing for our quality standards.<br />
PO325<br />
HIGHDOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY FOR EARLY BREAST CANCER:<br />
DOSIMETRIC DATA AND COSMETIC EFFECT<br />
M. Italiani 1 , M. Casale 1 , L. Chirico 1 , L. Draghini 1 , E. Buono 1 , M. Muti 1 ,<br />
L. Basagni 1 , E. Maranzano 1<br />
1 "S.Maria" Hospital, Radiotherapy, Terni, Italy<br />
: To evaluate the dosimetric parameters in a group<br />
<strong>of</strong> patients with lowrisk early breast cancer treated with HDRBRT on<br />
a prospective phase II trial and analyze the correlation with cosmetic<br />
oucome.<br />
: From <strong>May</strong> 2005 to January 20<strong>10</strong>, aseries <strong>of</strong> 74<br />
patients (pts), median age 66 years (range value 4285) with early<br />
breast cancer were treated with HDRBRT after conservative surgery.<br />
The implant was afterloaded with HDR Ir192 with a Nucletron remote<br />
unit and the interstitial implant are based about 23 layers <strong>of</strong> parallel<br />
catheters in trapezoidal symmetry. The treatment schedule was 4 Gy<br />
twice a day for a total dose <strong>of</strong> 32 Gy with a minimum interval <strong>of</strong> 6 h<br />
between the 2 daily fractions. No external beam radiotherapy was<br />
given. Clinical endpoints evaluated included: acute and late toxicity<br />
(according to RTOG/EORTC scoring criteria), infield and extrafield<br />
relapse, regional control, disease free survival, overall survival.<br />
Cosmetic outcome was evaluated at each followup visit and<br />
dichotomized as excellent and good/poor. Dosimetric parameters,<br />
calculated with PlatoNucletron treatment planning system, were<br />
volumes receiving definite relative isodose (V<strong>10</strong>0, V150, V200)<br />
homogeneity index (DHI) and skin dose.<br />
: During the followup 71 pts (96%) and 3 pts (4%) developed<br />
acute skin G1 and G2 toxicity, respectively. No patients had G34<br />
toxicity. Of the series, 45 (61%) had a G0 late toxicity, 25 (34%) G1,<br />
and 3 (4%) G2 toxicity. In no case grade G34 late toxicity was<br />
reported. No infield and/or extrafield relapse was registered after<br />
HDRBRT. Whereas, there were no local relapses, 4 patients<br />
developed distant (3 liver and 1 bone) metastases. At last followup,<br />
in 49 (66%) pts the cosmetic outcome was rated as excellent, in 17<br />
(34%) as good, only in 11 as poor. V<strong>10</strong>0 mean is 114.5cc. V<strong>10</strong>0 is<br />
always inferior than 30% <strong>of</strong> breast volume. DHI mean are 0.75. Skin<br />
dose significatevely conditionated cosmetic outcome which resulted<br />
excellent in 81% and 44% <strong>of</strong> pts receiving ≤55% and >55% <strong>of</strong><br />
prescripted dose, respectively (p=
S130 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
singledwell dose kernels that can later be used for optimization.<br />
bGPUMCD can also simulate previously optimized plans, taking in<br />
consideration all dwell positions and dwell times <strong>of</strong> the plan. To<br />
establish the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the platform, singlesource dosimetry for<br />
the microSelectron V2 source was compared to published reference<br />
data. Three clinical cases were also used: a prostate case, a breast<br />
case and a case with a shielded applicator. Timing and accuracy<br />
benchmarks were performed on these cases for singledwell dose<br />
calculations and multipledwell clinical dose distributions and<br />
compared to reference dose distributions computed with GEANT4 and<br />
using the same simulation parameters. Dosimetric values, voxels per<br />
voxels differences and 1%2mm gamma criteria were used to<br />
characterize the accuracy.<br />
: Singlesource dosimetry, compared to reference data for the<br />
microSelectron V2 source, was within 2% for the radial function and<br />
within 14% for the anisotropic function. By comparing D90 and V<strong>10</strong>0<br />
values <strong>of</strong> the clinical plans, bGPUMCD was within 1% or 2% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
reference distributions, depending on the case. The average <strong>of</strong> the<br />
absolute value <strong>of</strong> the difference for voxels within the target was near<br />
or below 2%. 90% <strong>of</strong> the target voxels passed the 1%2mm gamma<br />
criteria for all three cases. For timing experiments, the computation<br />
<strong>of</strong> a singledwell position dose distribution took between 0.25 and 0.5<br />
seconds for a 2% statistical uncertainty and the computation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
optimized plan, with multiple dwell positions, was approximately 2<br />
seconds for a 2% statistical uncertainty, as seen in the included data<br />
table.<br />
Prostate Breast Shielded applicator<br />
(s) (s) (s)<br />
Single dwell position 0.29 0.27 0.46<br />
Full plan recalculation 1.45 2.01 2.00<br />
: bGPUMCD has the potential to allow for fast and<br />
accurate Monte Carlo simulations in all phases <strong>of</strong> HDR brachytherapy<br />
treatment planning, including its use by inverse planning algorithms.<br />
PO327<br />
MIXED INTEGER PROGRAMMING FOR DOSE AND DOSEVOLUME BASED<br />
OPTIMIZATION IN PROSTATE HDRBRACHYTHERAPY<br />
B.L. Gorissen 1 , D. Den Hertog 1 , A.L. H<strong>of</strong>fmann 2<br />
1<br />
Tilburg University, Econometrics and Operations Research, Tilburg,<br />
The Netherlands<br />
2<br />
MAASTRO Clinic, Medical Physics, Maastricht, The Netherlands<br />
: Current inverse treatment planning methods that<br />
optimize both catheter positions and dwell times in prostate HDR<br />
brachytherapy use surrogate linear or quadratic objective functions<br />
that have no direct interpretation in terms <strong>of</strong> DVHcriteria, do not<br />
solve to optimality or have long solution times. The aim is to enhance<br />
existing methods to solve in clinically acceptable time and to<br />
formulate a new dosevolume based model that solves to optimality<br />
while satisfying preset DVHcriteria.<br />
: Existing dosebased linear programs (LP) with<br />
integer variables and quadratic programs (QP) have the advantage<br />
that a dwell time modulation restriction or total dwell time constraint<br />
can be added easily and solved using a state<strong>of</strong>theart MILP or MIQP<br />
solver. Modifications are implemented to decrease the solution times.<br />
For the quadratic model, an iterative procedure is proposed to allow<br />
the optimal target dose to be an interval, while retaining<br />
independence between the solution time and the number <strong>of</strong><br />
calculation points. The methods are evaluated on three clinical cases.<br />
: For existing dosebased models to be solved to optimality,<br />
our modifications allow to optimize over more than 40 candidate<br />
catheter positions. An average speedup <strong>of</strong> 75% can be obtained by<br />
stopping the solver at an early stage, without deterioration <strong>of</strong> the<br />
clinical plan quality. For a fixed catheter configuration, dosebased LP<br />
solves the dwell time optimization problem to optimality in less than<br />
15 seconds, which confirms earlier results obtained by others. The<br />
iterative procedure for QP is comparable in speed, but produces<br />
better plans than the noniterative QP. Our dosevolume based model<br />
optimizes both catheter positions and dwell times in 5 minutes (range:<br />
0.315 minutes), gives better DVH statistics than dosebased models<br />
and requires less a posteriori dwelltime adaptation by a human<br />
expert. The solutions have a relatively large surrogate objective<br />
value, suggesting that the correlation between objective value and<br />
clinical plan quality is weak in existing dosebased models.<br />
: Our modifications decrease the solution time <strong>of</strong> existing<br />
dosebased models for inverse treatment planning <strong>of</strong> both catheter<br />
positions and dwell times. Extending the quadratic model to include<br />
an iterative procedure to find the optimal target dose improves the<br />
plan quality. The new dosevolume based model allows simultaneous<br />
optimization <strong>of</strong> both catheter positions and dwell times in clinically<br />
acceptable time and produces treatment plans that better match pre<br />
set DVHcriteria than existing dosebased models.<br />
PO328<br />
NEW DESIGN OF THE VALENCIA APPLICATORS TO REDUCE RADIATION<br />
LEAKAGE<br />
D. Granero 1 , J. PerezCalatayud 2 , F. Ballester 3 , Z. Ouhib 4 , J. Vijande 3 ,<br />
J. Richart 5<br />
1<br />
ERESA Hospital General Universitario, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />
Physics, Valencia, Spain<br />
2<br />
Hospital La Fe, Physics Section. Radiotherapy Department, Valencia,<br />
Spain<br />
3<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Valencia, Department <strong>of</strong> Atomic Molecular and Nuclear<br />
Physics, Burjassot, Spain<br />
4<br />
Lynn Cancer Institute <strong>of</strong> Boca Raton Regional Hospital, Radiotherapy<br />
Department, Boca Raton, USA<br />
5<br />
Hospital Clinica Benidorm, Radiotherapy Department, Benidorm,<br />
Spain<br />
: The Valencia applicators are designed to treat<br />
skin lesions with the microSelectronHDR afterloader. Although the<br />
radiation is highly directed to the treatment area, radiation might<br />
leak through the backside <strong>of</strong> the applicator. Recently, the<br />
manufacturer has introduced a new applicator design to reduce such<br />
radiation leakage. This new design consists mainly in the addition <strong>of</strong><br />
about 4 mm <strong>of</strong> tungsten in the backside <strong>of</strong> the applicator making it<br />
thicker. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is to evaluate by means <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Monte Carlo method the radiation leakage <strong>of</strong> this new design and to<br />
evaluate whether this modification affects the dose rate distributions<br />
in the treatment area.<br />
: The complete geometry <strong>of</strong> the new<br />
applicators has been introduced in the Monte Carlo code GEANT4. The<br />
applicators have been located on the surface <strong>of</strong> a cylindrical water<br />
phantom following a methodology similar to the used in the original<br />
study <strong>of</strong> the Valencia applicators by Granero et al [Med.Phys 2008<br />
35:495503]. Kerma in the water phantom and kerma in air outside<br />
the phantom have been evaluated to estimate the radiation leakage<br />
<strong>of</strong> the new designed Valencia applicators.<br />
: The Monte Carlo simulations <strong>of</strong> the new applicators show that<br />
the radiation leakage has been reduced significantly from the previous<br />
design. The largest radiation leakage <strong>of</strong> this design is now about 30%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the dose at the prescription point and about <strong>10</strong>% at 1 cm from the<br />
backside <strong>of</strong> the applicators. The dose rate distributions in the area <strong>of</strong><br />
treatment have not changed.<br />
: In this study the radiation leakage <strong>of</strong> the new design <strong>of</strong><br />
the Valencia applicators has been obtained. The radiation leakages<br />
have been largely reduced from the previous design without<br />
compromising dose rate distributions in the treatment area.<br />
PO329<br />
DOSIMETRIC ANALYSIS OF A THERMOBRACHYTHERAPY APPLICATOR IN<br />
THE CONTEXT OF A POSITIONING REPRODUCIBILITY STUDY<br />
J. Sánchez Mazón 1 , K. Arunachalam 2 , R. McMahon 3 , B. Steffey 3 , P.<br />
Stauffer 3 , J. Chino 3 , O. Craciunescu 3<br />
1<br />
Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Oncología<br />
Radioterápica, Santander, Spain<br />
2<br />
Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, Engineering Design, Madras, India<br />
3<br />
Duke University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Durham, USA<br />
: A thermobrachytherapy surface applicator (TBSA)<br />
has been developed for simultaneous heat and brachytherapy<br />
treatment <strong>of</strong> chestwall (CW) recurrent breast cancer. The purpose <strong>of</strong><br />
this project is to assess variation in radiation dose due to movement<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 131<br />
<strong>of</strong> the TBSA relative to the target volume, as recorded during a<br />
volunteer protocol investigating TBSA comfort and secure fit.<br />
: The TBSA combines an 2cm spaced array <strong>of</strong><br />
brachytherapy catheters with a printed circuit board microwave<br />
antenna array coupled to the skin surface with a temperature<br />
controlled conformal 8 mm thick water bolus. Breath hold MRI scans<br />
<strong>of</strong> postmastectomy volunteers with the TBSA wrapped around the CW<br />
were acquired every 15 min for 90 min, a period during which the<br />
volunteers changed position several times. A planning target volume<br />
(PTV) representing a 5 mm skin strip was generated on each scan. An<br />
HDR plan to deliver 400cGy to the PTV using catheters spaced 2 cm<br />
apart was created on the Baseline scan <strong>of</strong> each volunteer using the<br />
volume optimization in BrachyVision 8.<strong>10</strong>. The plan was then<br />
reproduced on each subsequent scan. The following metrics were<br />
calculated for each plan: the coverage index V(x), with x = <strong>10</strong>0, 130,<br />
140, homogeneity index HI(x) = V(<strong>10</strong>0)V(x) for x = 130, 140, spill ratio<br />
SR = (Volume <strong>of</strong> normal tissue receiving <strong>10</strong>0% dose or more)/(Total<br />
volume receiving <strong>10</strong>0% dose or more), skin overdose OD = <strong>10</strong>0%(Dskin<br />
Dtarget)/Dtarget (with Dskin and Dtarget the dose at skin and 5 mm depth),<br />
and ipsilateral (i) and contralateral (c) mean lung dose MLD. For one<br />
<strong>of</strong> the patients, an electron plan was also generated in Eclipse for<br />
comparison, using two 20x20 cones, mixed 9 and <strong>12</strong> MeV, 1 cm bolus,<br />
and calculated with the Electron Monte Carlo algorithm (v. <strong>10</strong>.0.28).<br />
: Three volunteers were fitted with a rectangular (500 cm 2 )<br />
TBSA and two with a Lshaped (875 cm 2 ) TBSA. The mean PTV volume<br />
was 118.1 ± 0.1 cm 3 . The mean baseline ± STDEV <strong>of</strong> each metric is<br />
reported followed in parantheis by the maximum % variation between<br />
baseline and the 90 min scan: V(<strong>10</strong>0) =96.2% ± 0.9 (4.3%), HI(130) =<br />
91.8% ± 5.2 (6.4%), HI(140) = 94.6% ± 2.1 (5.1%), SR = 18.8 %± 5.4<br />
(15.6%), skin OD = 13.8 %± 1.5 (1.8%), MLDi = 1.064 Gy ± 0.2 (1.2%),<br />
and MLDc = 0.34 Gy ± 0.05 (3.4%). In contrast, the electron plan was<br />
inferior in target coverage, V(<strong>10</strong>0) = 86.1%, had lower HIs, HI(130) =<br />
80.4%, HI(140) = 83.1%, and larger spill ratio <strong>of</strong> 37%. Lung doses were<br />
lower, MLDi = 0.6 Gy and MLDc = 0.04 Gy, but might become<br />
comparable if a comparable V<strong>10</strong>0 was targeted.<br />
: The dosimetric impact <strong>of</strong> applicator displacements<br />
relative to the skin and target volume measured in this study are<br />
small, and changes in dosimetry due to these displacements are not<br />
clinically significant. The advantages <strong>of</strong> using this applicator for<br />
extensive CW disease include the potential for enhanced effect from<br />
simultaneous heat and radiation, and superior dose metrics compared<br />
to electron therapy.<br />
PO330<br />
INTEREST OF THE MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS FOR DOSIMETRIC<br />
EVALUATION OF THE 50 KVP DEVICE "PAPILLON50"<br />
O. Croce 1 , S. Hachem 1 , E. Franchisseur 2 , J.P. Gérard 3 , S. Marcié 3<br />
1<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Nice SophiaAntipolis, Radiotherapy Lab., Nice, France<br />
2<br />
Dosis<strong>of</strong>t, Radiotherapy, Cachan, France<br />
3<br />
Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Radiotherapy, Nice, France<br />
: We presents a dosimetric study concerning the<br />
system named 'Papillon 50' used in the department <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy <strong>of</strong><br />
the Centre AntoineLacassagne, Nice, France. The machine provides a<br />
50 kVp Xray beam, currently used to treat the cancers <strong>of</strong> skin, eyelid<br />
or rectum. The system can be mounted with various applicators <strong>of</strong><br />
different diameters or shapes. These applicators can be fixed over the<br />
main rod tube <strong>of</strong> the unit in order to deliver the prescribed dose into<br />
the tumour with an optimal dose distribution.<br />
: We have analyzed depth dose curves and<br />
dose pr<strong>of</strong>iles for the naked tube and for a set <strong>of</strong> three applicators<br />
with SSD <strong>of</strong> 28.7mm, 32.3mm and 38.3mm. Dose measurements were<br />
made with an ionization chamber (PTW type 23342) and Gafchromic<br />
films (EBT2). We have also compared the measurements with Monte<br />
Carlo simulations (code PENELOPE) which have been used with a<br />
detailed geometrical description <strong>of</strong> the experimental setup.<br />
: The depths <strong>of</strong> the 50% isodose in water for the various<br />
applicators are respectively 6.0, 6.6 and 7.1 mm. Results showed a<br />
good agreement between simulations and physical measurements.<br />
Simulations are able to provide an accurate evaluation <strong>of</strong> the dose<br />
delivered. The following figure illustrates the close correlation<br />
between the measurements performed with a PTW ion chamber and<br />
the data from Monte Carlo PENELOPE simulations for depth dose curve<br />
using a 3 cm straight end applicator.<br />
Moreover, we design a specific s<strong>of</strong>tware named 'MC2Plan' that uses a<br />
precalculated dose distribution data from Monte Carlo simulations.<br />
MC2Plan can be useful to display isodoses when combining contact X<br />
rays radiotherapy and external beam radiotherapy in order to help<br />
radiation oncologists to optimize treatments.<br />
: The Monte Carlo PENELOPE simulations are in<br />
accordance with the measurements for a 50 kV Xray system.<br />
Simulations are able to confirm the measurements provided by<br />
Gafchromic films or ionization chambers. Results also demonstrate<br />
that Monte Carlo simulations could be helpful to validate the future<br />
applicators designed for other applications such as intraoperative<br />
radiotherapy (IORT) for breast cancer. Furthermore, Monte Carlo<br />
simulations could be a reliable alternative for a rapid evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />
the dose delivered by such a system that uses multiple designs <strong>of</strong><br />
applicators.<br />
PO331<br />
SIMPLE PHANTOM SETUP FOR ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE HDR<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE<br />
T. Ribeiro Nuno Ramos 1 , M.E.R. Poli 1<br />
1 Hospital Santa Maria, Medical Physics Unit, Lisbon, Portugal<br />
: To develop a simple and low cost phantom setup<br />
to be used in a quality assurance procedure for ultrasound guided<br />
prostate high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy that encompasses the<br />
tests <strong>of</strong> the AAPM TG <strong>12</strong>8 report, geometry tests based on IAEA TRS<br />
430 and additional image fusion and dose verification tests.<br />
: The materials used were: a table tennis ball,<br />
three Nucletron's 6F needles for prostate implant, a Siemens<br />
ultrasound equipment, a Nucletron's HDR prostate brachytherapy<br />
system and a MOSFET dosimeter. The tennis table ball was selected<br />
for this setup because it is an object <strong>of</strong> known dimensions, good<br />
image contrast, low cost and easy to get. The phantom setup consists<br />
<strong>of</strong> inserting the three needles through the template and the table<br />
tennis ball in a triangular shape. The phantom and the transrectal<br />
ultrasound probe are then fixed to the stepper and inserted into a<br />
small water tank (Figure 1). The first set <strong>of</strong> image tests, based on<br />
AAPM TG <strong>12</strong>8 report, were (1) grayscale visibility, (2) depth <strong>of</strong><br />
penetration, (3) axial and lateral resolution, (4) axial and lateral<br />
distance measurement accuracy, (5) area measurement accuracy, (6)<br />
volume measurement accuracy, (7) needle template/ electronic grid<br />
alignment, (8) treatment planning system (TPS). A new image test was<br />
developed to evaluate the TPS image fusion (9). CT and MR images <strong>of</strong><br />
the phantom were made to allow volume measurements in both image<br />
sets and manual fusion tests with the ultrasound based images.<br />
Geometrical tests, based on IAEA TRS 430, for (<strong>10</strong>) needle<br />
reconstruction accuracy and (11) source position accuracy were also<br />
made. Finally, a dose verification test (<strong>12</strong>) was performed inserting a<br />
MOSFET dosimeter, through a catheter previously placed in the<br />
phantom parallel to the needles.
S132 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
Figure 1 – Phantom setup.<br />
: Table 1 presents a summary <strong>of</strong> the results. The AAPM TG <strong>12</strong>8<br />
required tests (1 to 8) were accomplished with the setup used and the<br />
results were within the action limits. In test 6, the table tennis ball<br />
volume calculated by the ultrasound system was 2% higher than the<br />
actual volume. CT and MR images volume measurements, test 9, were<br />
about 1% lower than actual value. The fusion tests also showed a good<br />
matching between the images. The geometrical tests (<strong>10</strong> and 11) were<br />
also accomplished and the results were less than 1 mm.<br />
The final dose verification test (<strong>12</strong>) result, comparing TPS and<br />
measured values, was less than 2%.<br />
Table 1 – Results <strong>of</strong> the tests.<br />
: The phantom setup and methodology presented in this<br />
study allows the completion <strong>of</strong> AAPM TG <strong>12</strong>8 required tests as well as<br />
other tests recommended either by IAEA TRS 430 and the authors.<br />
A final note is that this setup only uses a table tennis ball and<br />
material that normally exists in a department with ultrasound guided<br />
prostate brachytherapy.<br />
PO332<br />
IS HDR EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE SUITABLE FOR MODERN<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY? POSITIONAL ERRORS, DOSIMETRIC IMPACT & CASE<br />
STUDY<br />
A. Palmer 1 , O. Hayman 2 , L. Ioannou 2 , Y.S. Nagar 3<br />
1<br />
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust (& University <strong>of</strong> Surrey Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />
Engineering and Physical Science), Radiotherapy Physics, Portsmouth,<br />
United Kingdom<br />
2<br />
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Radiotherapy Physics, Portsmouth,<br />
United Kingdom<br />
3<br />
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Clinical Oncology, Portsmouth,<br />
United Kingdom<br />
: To study the effect <strong>of</strong> simulated HDR source<br />
dwell position errors on the dose to the clinical target volume (HR<br />
CTV) and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk in cervix cancer. Determine the clinically<br />
relevant positional accuracy requirement; inform QC needs and<br />
treatment uncertainty estimates. Interpret the performance <strong>of</strong> an<br />
HDR unit using this data.<br />
: Simulated dwell position errors, 0.2 to <strong>10</strong>.0<br />
mm, were introduced in eight HDR cervix plans and the dosimetric<br />
effect on ICRU and GECESTRO DVH parameters calculated. CT plans<br />
on the Eckert & Ziegler BEBIG (EZ) HDRplus planning system, with Co<br />
60 source and IUT/splitring applicator were used throughout. Two<br />
error modes were simulated: (a) systematic proximal shift (away from<br />
HDR unit) position calibration error; (b) source cable takeup lag,<br />
possible with older EZ s<strong>of</strong>tware, first dwell unaffected and others<br />
shifted distally [1].<br />
Video source position tests for the EZ HDR MultiSource were used with<br />
the above simulation data to predict effect on clinical dose delivery.<br />
: Figure 1 shows the relationship between systematic errors in<br />
source dwell positions, mode (a), and the % change in DVH metrics,<br />
D90 and D2cc. The mean and interquartile range from eight plans is<br />
provided. There is an approximate linear relationship; errors <strong>of</strong> 1.0<br />
mm result in 2.0 % change, 4.0 mm error <strong>10</strong>.0 % change. ICRU A pt.<br />
exhibits less change than DVH metrics, 0.4% and 0.7% respectively.<br />
Bladder doses increase while rectum, sigmoid and HRCTV decrease<br />
due to the proximal shift direction <strong>of</strong> dwells. This would be reversed<br />
for distal shifts. Table 1 gives additional detailed DVH data for 0.2 to<br />
2.0 mm position errors for both modes. Previous s<strong>of</strong>tware version <strong>of</strong><br />
the EZ unit had the potential for small dwell position errors due to<br />
curvature <strong>of</strong> the transfer tube: This effect on dose delivery<br />
uncertainty is given in Table 1(b). This is eliminated with new<br />
s<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />
Thirty QC test results <strong>of</strong> source position were collated for the EZ HDR<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 133<br />
unit. 13% were recorded within 0.25 mm error, 64% within 0.5 mm,<br />
and 23% within 1.0 mm.<br />
Figure 1. Effect <strong>of</strong> systematic proximal dwell position shifts, 0.2 to 6.0<br />
mm, mode (a), on DVH metrics. Data is the mean and interquartile<br />
range from eight cervix plans.<br />
Table 1. Effect <strong>of</strong> dwell position shifts on dose delivery metrics, 0.2 to<br />
2.0 mm; modes (a) and (b), see text.<br />
: An accuracy <strong>of</strong> at least 1.0 mm in dwell positions is<br />
required to limit the effect on clinically relevant dose delivery<br />
parameters to within an acceptable level <strong>of</strong> 3.0%. Only at 0.2 mm<br />
accuracy are the effects all within 1.0%. A QC action level <strong>of</strong> 0.5 mm<br />
is proposed, with 1.0 mm maximum tolerance. All recorded QC<br />
position results for the EZ unit were within the clinically relevant<br />
accuracy level. Errors due to source cable takeup lag, with potential<br />
DVH uncertainty up to 6%, have been eliminated with the new<br />
s<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />
[1] Palmer A et al. Performance assessment <strong>of</strong> the BEBIG multisource high dose rate brachytherapy treatment<br />
unit. Phys Med Biol 2009:54;74177434<br />
PO333<br />
PARTICULARITIES OF I<strong>12</strong>5 SEED CALIBRATION FOR PROSTATE<br />
INTERSTITIAL PERMANENT BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
A. TorneroLópez 1 , F. Simancas 1 , S. RuizArrebola 1 , M. GazdicSantic 2 ,<br />
D. Guirado 1<br />
1 Universitary Hospital San Cecilio, Radiophysics, Granada, Spain<br />
2 Clinical Centre <strong>of</strong> Sarajevo University, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical<br />
Physics and Radiation Safety, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina<br />
: For the measuring <strong>of</strong> I<strong>12</strong>5 seeds, we have<br />
available the plane parallel chamber SourceCheck (PTW), calibrated<br />
by PTW Laboratory Calibration Center, and the well chamber HDR<strong>10</strong>00<br />
(Standard Imaging), calibrated by the Wisconsin University. These<br />
chambers show a discrepancy <strong>of</strong> 6% between its simultaneous<br />
measurements <strong>of</strong> the same I<strong>12</strong>5 seed. We also found a difference <strong>of</strong><br />
about 3% <strong>of</strong> each chamber measurement from the value provided by<br />
the manufacturer for that particular seed. It is essential to find out<br />
the cause <strong>of</strong> these differences to guarantee the AAPM 1 and ESTRO 2<br />
recommendations for the QA procedure in brachytherapy (figure 1).<br />
Motivated by this scenario, we aim to establish a user protocol<br />
yielding to a fulfillment <strong>of</strong> the recommendations.<br />
: After doing an optimal statistical monitoring<br />
<strong>of</strong> both chambers, we have carried out several lines <strong>of</strong> work:<br />
1. The well chamber lecture is corrected by an additional pressure<br />
dependent factor 3 . As other hospitals, ours is located at a quite high<br />
altitude above the sea level. This fact compels us to apply correction<br />
factors as big as 3.03.5%, besides the usual tp correction. We<br />
performed an experiment to verify that this correction yields to<br />
coherent results. We took measurements at different altitudes,<br />
spanning pressures from 596 up to 770 mmHg.<br />
2. To have a set <strong>of</strong> consistent calibrated chambers, we opted for<br />
calibrating them all in our hospital using a calibration source provided<br />
by an ADCL. This possibility is included in the AAPM protocol for<br />
braquitherapy 4 .<br />
A monitoring procedure has been developed to control the deviation<br />
between the user measured distribution and the manufacturer one:<br />
periodic measurement <strong>of</strong> a sample <strong>of</strong> at least <strong>10</strong> seeds combined with<br />
the sporadic measurement <strong>of</strong> an individual seed calibrated by the<br />
manufacturer.<br />
: We confirm that the pressuredependent correction factor is<br />
correctly applicable to our well chamber. However, we find out that<br />
instead <strong>of</strong> applying a potential function correction, a simpler linear<br />
one yields to equivalent results.<br />
We measured the Air Kerma Strength (AKS) distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> sets <strong>of</strong> a<br />
mean <strong>of</strong> 20 seeds. We observed a systematic deviation <strong>of</strong> 2.5% from<br />
the manufacturing distribution. A similar difference is found with<br />
respect to the value <strong>of</strong> an individual calibrated seed.<br />
: The differences found in the measurements <strong>of</strong> the well<br />
chamber HDR<strong>10</strong>00, the SourceCheck and the manufacturer equipment<br />
are presumably due to discrepancies between their calibrations.<br />
We remark the need <strong>of</strong> a consistent cross calibration <strong>of</strong> the user’s<br />
available ionometric setups.<br />
We also suggest the realization <strong>of</strong> a statistical monitoring <strong>of</strong> the<br />
systematic difference between the manufacturing and user<br />
distributions <strong>of</strong> the AKS.<br />
1. Butler et al. Med Phys 2008;35:38605.<br />
2. Venselaar JLM, PérezCalatayud J. ESTRO Booklet No 8.<br />
ESTRO;2004.<br />
3. Griffin et al. Med Phys 2005;32: 1<strong>10</strong>3114<br />
4. Rivard et al. Med Phys 2004;31:63374.<br />
PO334<br />
DOSIMETRIC CONSEQUENCES OF ROTATIONAL ERRORS WITH DIRECT<br />
SIMULATION FOR PARTIAL BREAST IRRADIATION USING CONTURAÔ<br />
J. Peng 1 , M. Ashenafi 1 , K. Vanek 1 , J. Harper 1 , J. Jenrette 1<br />
1<br />
Medical University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina, Radiation Oncology,<br />
Charleston, USA<br />
: The purpose was to determine dosedelivery<br />
errors resulting from systematic rotational positioning errors <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Contura multilumen balloon catheter for Accelerated Partial Breast<br />
Irradiation (APBI) using direct simulation in the 3D imaging<br />
registration system (VelocityAl).<br />
: Twenty patients who received APBI had dose<br />
distributions reevaluated to assess the impact <strong>of</strong> systematic<br />
rotational positioning errors. The dosimetric effect <strong>of</strong> rotational
S134 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
errors was simulated by rotating 3D dose cloud manually using the 3D<br />
imaging registration system (VelocityAI), as shown in figure. The<br />
rotational errors <strong>of</strong> ± 1°, ± 3°, ± 5°, ± 7° , ± <strong>10</strong>° , ± 30°,± 45° and ±<br />
90 ° along each axis were simulated. Dosimetric effects <strong>of</strong> the rotated<br />
plans were compared with the original plans. In previous study, the<br />
balloon to skin/chest wall distance, (BtoS Dist.) was the most critical<br />
factor to affect the treatment results. Results for two groups <strong>of</strong><br />
patients were analyzed: (1) BtoS Dist. ≤ 7mm (the small BtoS group) ;(<br />
2) BtoS Dist.>7mm (the large BtoS group).<br />
: A comparison <strong>of</strong> various dosimetric parameters is presented<br />
in the Table. The mean volume <strong>of</strong> PTV_Eval (1cm rind <strong>of</strong> breast tissue<br />
outside <strong>of</strong> the balloon) that received the prescription dose decreased,<br />
for the small BtoS group, from 1.7% ± 2.2% (less than <strong>10</strong>°) to 28.1% ±<br />
25.9% (up to 90°); for the large BtoS group, from 0.7% ± 0.5% (less<br />
than <strong>10</strong>°) to 3.3% ± 3.4% (up to 90°). In general, the increase in the<br />
volumes <strong>of</strong> the <strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OARs) receiving the tolerance doses was<br />
small and did not exceed the tolerance, except for cases where the<br />
OARs were in close proximity to the balloon (3% tumor coverage loss and >36%<br />
maximal dose increase to the OARs, for the small and large BtoS<br />
groups, respectively. However, for small BtoS Dist. ≤ 3mm targets<br />
with the elliptical shape <strong>of</strong> dose cloud, the target coverage and dose<br />
<strong>of</strong> OARs decreased significantly as rotational errors <strong>of</strong> 3° or more<br />
were present.<br />
: Rotational errors should be evaluated carefully for<br />
clinical cases involving small balloon to skin/chest wall distance and<br />
for dose cloud with elliptical shape. For the best dosimetric results,<br />
APBI treatments using Contura should have rotational errors ≤ 3° (BtoS<br />
Dist. ≤ 3mm), ≤ <strong>10</strong>° (BtoS Dist.≤ 7mm) and ≤ 45° (BtoS Dist.> 7mm)<br />
PO335<br />
INVERSE PLANNING OF CONFORMAL HDRPROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
BOOST TECHNIQUE USING TWO CTVS<br />
S. Wolf 1 , G. Bockelmann 1 , F.A. Siebert 1<br />
1 University Hospital SH Campus Kiel, Radiotherapy, Kiel, Germany<br />
: Ultrasoundbased intraoperative HDRprostate<br />
brachytherapy (BT) as boost technique is a well established method in<br />
our clinic. To date the treatment planning is performed manually as<br />
conventional planning technique (CP). Despite the success <strong>of</strong> this<br />
method, the introduction <strong>of</strong> inverse planning techniques (IP) is hoped<br />
to reduce planning time and to decrease user dependency <strong>of</strong> the<br />
planning process itself. In this study the clinical implementation and<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> inverse planning for HDR prostate BT is presented. In<br />
contrast to other HDR prostate techniques the target structure is<br />
segmented into two parts: the peripheral zone <strong>of</strong> the prostate (CTV2)<br />
and the whole prostate gland (CTV2).<br />
: For the patient cohort considered in mean <strong>12</strong><br />
needles were implanted in the typical ushape form. Using 38<br />
different clinical treatment plans appropriate dose constraints for the<br />
IP algorithm (BrachyVision v8.8, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto,<br />
CA) were identified. Prescription doses for CTV1/CTV2 were 15/8.5<br />
Gy. Doses in urethra and rectum should be lower than <strong>10</strong> and 8 Gy,<br />
resp. Because the CTV1 is <strong>of</strong>ten badly visible with ultrasound after<br />
insertion <strong>of</strong> the implant needles, the CTV1 was geometrically defined<br />
by a threedimensional 0.5 cm hull around the implanted needles.<br />
After establishing a general template <strong>of</strong> dose constraints and their<br />
appropriate weightings, applicable to all patient anatomies, all<br />
treatment plans were calculated according the TG43 formalism using<br />
identical start conditions as well: three seconds dwell times in all<br />
dwell positions, calculation time for the IP algorithm in the treatment<br />
planning system was one minute, a maximum dwell time <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> seconds<br />
was allowed, and dwell time smooth function was set to maximum<br />
<strong>10</strong>0%. IP results were compared against the existing clinical CP by<br />
using D90CTV1/2, V200CTV1/2, D2ccrectum, D0.1ccurethra, and COIN index.<br />
Significant statistical differences (pvalue < 0.05) were analyzed by<br />
the MannWhitney rank sum test.<br />
: The inverse planning results in this study were available after<br />
one minute. In contrast to this an experienced medical physicist needs<br />
about <strong>10</strong> to 15 minutes per treatment plan. The results <strong>of</strong> this study<br />
are summarized in table 1. Dosimetric indices are very similar<br />
between CP and IP techniques. Only V200CTV1 is significantly lower for<br />
CP. Moreover the IP technique fairly reduced (not statistical<br />
significant) the D0.1ccurethra.<br />
: This study showed that the usage <strong>of</strong> IP algorithms for<br />
HDR prostate boost techniques with a complex CTV arrangement can<br />
yield similar dosimetric results as a CP technique. Nevertheless<br />
dosimetric results <strong>of</strong> an inverse planning must be checked by an<br />
expert physicist before patient treatment.<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 135<br />
PO336<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY ACTIVITIES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE EUROPEAN<br />
METROLOGY RESEARCH PROGRAMME<br />
T. Schneider 1 , U. Ankerhold 1 , J. Solc 2<br />
1<br />
Phys. Techn. Bundesanstalt (PTB), Dosimetry for Radiation Therapy,<br />
Braunschweig, Germany<br />
2<br />
Czech Metrology Institute, Inspectorate for Ionizing Radiation,<br />
Praha, Czech Republic<br />
: The European Metrology Research Programme<br />
(EMRP) enables European metrology institutes to collaborate with<br />
industrial <strong>org</strong>anisations and academia on joint research projects<br />
within specified fields. The EMRP is implemented by EURAMET e.V.,<br />
<strong>org</strong>anised by 22 European National Metrology Institutes (NMIs),<br />
supported by the European Union and has a budget <strong>of</strong> 400 M€ over an<br />
approximately seven year period. In 2011 a new Joint Research<br />
Project (JRP) in the field dosimetry <strong>of</strong> ionizing radiation was initiated<br />
and approved after a review conference. A part <strong>of</strong> this project covers<br />
the recent developments in brachytherapy. In this presentation an<br />
outline <strong>of</strong> the planned activities for dosimetry in brachytherapy will<br />
be given.<br />
: The work within the new JRP addresses the<br />
establishing <strong>of</strong> miniature xray tubes for the treatment with low<br />
energy photons as well as the work in the community <strong>of</strong> medical<br />
physicists to bring up the treatment modality and treatment planning<br />
to the level already achieved in External Beam Radiation Therapy,<br />
manifested in the work <strong>of</strong> the AAPM TG 186 task group members in<br />
close cooperation with the European society ESTRO.<br />
: The dosimetry system <strong>of</strong> two miniature xray tubes will be<br />
investigated: one from the vendor Carl Zeiss called 'Intrabeam ® ' and<br />
another one from the vendor X<strong>of</strong>t called 'Axxent ® ' tube. The<br />
calibration procedures <strong>of</strong>fered by the vendors are totally different.<br />
The Axxent system uses a well type chamber calibrated in terms <strong>of</strong> Air<br />
Kerma Strength (AKS) for the radiation field <strong>of</strong> I<strong>12</strong>5. Calibration<br />
factor in AKS for the Axxent field are under development (NIST,<br />
Univ. Wisconsin). For the Intrabeam device the calibration is based on<br />
measurements in a water phantom in terms <strong>of</strong> absorbed dose to water<br />
with a s<strong>of</strong>t xray ionization chamber. As no NMI <strong>of</strong>fers calibrations in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> absorbed dose to water DW in a certain depth in a water<br />
phantom in the respective radiation field, this calibration factor is<br />
derived from Air Kerma calibrations and a conversion into DW<br />
according to ICRU 17. The goal <strong>of</strong> the first part <strong>of</strong> the brachytherapy<br />
work is to characterize the sources, to establish a primary standard in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> absorbed dose to water and to give recommendations on a<br />
calibration chain.<br />
: In most publications the results <strong>of</strong> treatment planning<br />
are compared only to MonteCarlo calculations and not to<br />
experimental data. It is the topic <strong>of</strong> the second part <strong>of</strong> the work to<br />
overcome this problem by developing measuring techniques to canvass<br />
the results <strong>of</strong> treatment planning systems in the presence <strong>of</strong> clinical<br />
applicators. For NMIs this means a step apart from the standard fields<br />
usually applied to a complex field close to clinical conditions. The<br />
applied measuring devices will be characterized to achieve an<br />
absolute uncertainty below 2% (k=1) in this irregular, nonstandard<br />
field and the uncertainty <strong>of</strong> the positioning will be below 30 m.<br />
PO337<br />
MAPPING OF RELATIVE DOSE RATE DISTRIBUTION UNCERTAINTY OWING<br />
TO SOURCE CONSTRUCTION<br />
K. Zourari 1 , E. Pantelis 1 , L. Sakelliou 2 , E. Ge<strong>org</strong>iou 1 , P. Papagiannis 1<br />
1<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Athens, Medical School Medical Physics Laboratory,<br />
Athens, Greece<br />
2<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Athens, Physics Department Nuclear and Particle<br />
Physics Section, Athens, Greece<br />
: A joint AAPM/GECESTRO report 1 recommends<br />
that brachytherapy source dosimetry investigators using Monte Carlo<br />
simulation (MC) should determine the effect <strong>of</strong> type B uncertainties<br />
on the quantities proposed for clinical use. This work presents results<br />
<strong>of</strong> a method to map the total uncertainty owing to source construction<br />
related type B uncertainties based on the ISO Guide to the Expression<br />
<strong>of</strong> Uncertainty in Measurement 2 and MC.<br />
: Calculations were performed for one<br />
commercially available <strong>12</strong>5 I LDR seed. 3 Information on the dimensions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the cylindrical silver marker, the thickness <strong>of</strong> its radioactive silver<br />
halide coating, and the dimensions <strong>of</strong> the titanium encapsulation,<br />
were available 3 as: xi±axi. Corresponding standard uncertainties were<br />
calculated assuming uniform probability distributions. Let be a<br />
point in the 2D matrix <strong>of</strong> dose rate per unit air kerma strength on a<br />
plane including the source long axis.<br />
is a function <strong>of</strong> xi (i.e. ) and, assuming f is<br />
approximately linear and no correlation exists between xi, its standard<br />
uncertainty can be calculated according to the law <strong>of</strong> uncertainty<br />
propagation 2 : . MC simulations were<br />
performed to obtain the 2D distribution <strong>of</strong> around the nominal<br />
source design, as well as source designs where each <strong>of</strong> the quantities<br />
xi was individually varied, assuming values <strong>of</strong> xiaxi or xi+axi. This<br />
allowed for the forward and backward finite difference<br />
approximations <strong>of</strong> the partial derivatives in the above equation, and<br />
hence the calculation <strong>of</strong> 2D maps <strong>of</strong> the total standard uncertainty<br />
owing to source construction and the partial contributions to it.<br />
: The figure presents the overall % relative standard<br />
uncertainty <strong>of</strong> around the source (left) compared to the<br />
corresponding type A MC uncertainty (right). As expected, radioactive<br />
coating thickness, followed by end weld radius, were the major<br />
uncertainty contributors affecting mainly points close to the source<br />
longitudinal axis. Uncertainty results at these points are comparable<br />
to the uncertainty <strong>of</strong> NIST traceable SK calibration <strong>of</strong> seeds delivered<br />
to the clinic. 1 The former however is position dependent and<br />
therefore subject to smoothing out when multiple sources are used.<br />
: Results support recommendations 1 that detailed<br />
information on the source should be openly provided by<br />
manufacturers and considered by dosimetry investigators. The<br />
proposed 2D mapping method facilitates the overview <strong>of</strong> total<br />
uncertainty while providing all the input necessary for the calculation<br />
<strong>of</strong> uncertainty <strong>of</strong> TG43 quantities. The brute force implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
MC could be replaced by methods <strong>of</strong> improved computational<br />
efficiency or physically intuitive models.<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
Kiveli Zourari was supported by Irakleitos II.<br />
References<br />
1. L. De Werd et al. Med. Phys. 38, 782801, 2011.<br />
2. Guide to the expression <strong>of</strong> uncertainty in measurement, ISO, JCGM<br />
<strong>10</strong>0, 2008.<br />
3. P. Karaiskos et al. Med. Phys. 28, 1753–1760, 2001.
S136 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
PO338<br />
VAGINAL CUFF BRACHYTHERAPY USING OVOIDS: COMPARISON OF<br />
POINT BASED AND TARGET BASED PRESCRIPTION<br />
S. Sharma 1 , D. Manigandan 1 , A.K. Gandhi 1 , D.N. Sharma 1 , V.<br />
Subramani 1 , P.K. Julka 1 , G.K. Rath 1<br />
1<br />
All India Institute <strong>of</strong> Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Radiation Oncology,<br />
Delhi, India<br />
: To compare the treatment plans with point based<br />
and target dose point based prescription methods for vaginal cuff<br />
brachytherapy with two ovoids.<br />
: Twenty previously treated sessions <strong>of</strong> post<br />
operative carcinoma uterine cervix patients were studied. For all the<br />
patients, application was done by using two Fletcher ovoids under<br />
sedation. After application, CT scan was done at 3mm slice thickness.<br />
The target volume was contoured and it assumed to be around the<br />
applicator, however, in some cases, modification was done according<br />
to the clinical and planning CT findings. Similarly, <strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OAR)<br />
i.e. bladder and rectum were contoured. The ICRU38 bladder and<br />
rectum points were also marked on CT images. Applicators were<br />
reconstructed using 2.5mm source step size and plans were generated<br />
for Nucletron HDRV2 machine using PLATO planning system. In both<br />
the ovoids, first four dwell positions were activated and dose<br />
prescription was done by using two different prescription methods.<br />
One is conventional point dose (PD) based and the second is target<br />
dose point (TDP) based. For conventional PD method, the dose<br />
prescription point was at 5mm above the superior surface <strong>of</strong> mid<br />
dwell position <strong>of</strong> two ovoids. For TDP based method, target dose<br />
points were created 5mm around the target. No optimization was<br />
done after prescription. For comparison purposes, dose was<br />
prescribed at <strong>10</strong>0cGy. For plan evaluation, following dose volume<br />
indices were used: Volume <strong>of</strong> target that receive <strong>10</strong>0% (V<strong>10</strong>0), 95%<br />
(V95), and 90% (V90) <strong>of</strong> prescription dose, coverage index<br />
(CI=V<strong>10</strong>0/Target volume) and overdose volume index (OI=V200/V<strong>10</strong>0). For<br />
bladder and rectum, doses received by 0.1cc (D0.1cc), 1cc (D1cc), 2cc<br />
(D2cc), 5cc (D5cc), and <strong>10</strong>cc (D<strong>10</strong>cc) <strong>of</strong> volumes were noted. The ICRU38<br />
bladder and rectum point doses were also noted to correlate with<br />
volumetric doses.<br />
: The plan comparison is summarized in Table.1. Volumetric<br />
evaluation shows that target coverage was lower in PD based plans<br />
than the TDP based plans. However, the OI index shows that high dose<br />
volume was more in TDP based plans compared to PD plans. In<br />
addition, the OAR doses were higher in TDP based method than the PD<br />
based. In the both TDP and PD methods, the bladder doses received<br />
by 0.1cc, 1cc, 2cc and 5cc volumes were higher compared to ICRU38<br />
bladder point doses and doses to <strong>10</strong>cc bladder volume were in closer<br />
agreement with the ICRU38 bladder points. Similarly, for rectum, the<br />
doses received by 0.1cc, and 1cc volumes were higher compared to<br />
ICRU38 rectum point doses and doses to 2–5cc volume <strong>of</strong> rectum were<br />
in closer agreement with the ICRU38 rectum points.<br />
: In the CT guided PD prescription method, lesser target<br />
coverage and lower OAR doses were observed. In TDP based<br />
prescription, target coverage was higher and resulted in higher OAR<br />
doses. Doses received by <strong>10</strong>cc <strong>of</strong> bladder and 2–5cc <strong>of</strong> rectum were<br />
closer to ICRU38 bladder and rectum points, respectively.<br />
PO339<br />
MRIDUMMY MARKERS OF MRIGUIDED HDR BRACHYTHERAPY FOR<br />
INTERSTITIAL PROSTATE AND INTRACAVITARY GYN CANCERS<br />
J. Schindel 1 , M. Muruganandham 1 , A. Eagle 2 , M. Hewitt 2 , T.<br />
Stockman 2 , C. Pigge 3 , Y. Kim 1<br />
1<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Iowa, Radiation Oncology, Iowa City, USA<br />
2<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Iowa, Electrical Computer Engineering, Iowa City, USA<br />
3<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Iowa, Chemistry, Iowa City, USA<br />
: Compare seven different MRIdummy markers for<br />
interstitial prostate and intracavitary GYN HDR brachytherapy.<br />
: Seven markers were used: Saline, Conray60<br />
(Mallinckrodt medical), CuSO4 (1.5g/L), liquid Vitamin E, fish oil, 1%<br />
Agarose gel (AGEL: 1g Agarose powder/ <strong>10</strong>0 ml distilled water), and a<br />
cobaltchloride complex contrast (C4) (CoCl2: Glycine=4:1). Interstitial<br />
and intracavitary phantoms were designed. The interstitial phantom<br />
consisted <strong>of</strong> eight flexi needles (outer/inner diameter <strong>of</strong><br />
1.98mm/1.45mm) that were filled with each MRImarker and<br />
embedded in 450 mL <strong>of</strong> 3% AGEL. The intracavitary phantom consisted<br />
<strong>of</strong> 4L <strong>of</strong> 3% AGEL, a plastic tandem and ring applicator (Varian), and<br />
MRIdummy catheters (outer/inner diameter <strong>of</strong> 2.66mm/1.87mm).<br />
Clinical 3T MRI protocols (both T1weightedMRI (T1MRI:1mm slice<br />
thickness) and T2weightedMRI scans (T2MRI: 3mm slice thickness))<br />
were used. Signal intensities for each marker were characterized as<br />
percentages compared to the 3% AGEL background using ImageJ<br />
s<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />
: Some interstitial markers, even though small agent volume,<br />
could generate favorable signals (> <strong>10</strong>0%), implying their feasibility for<br />
MRIguided prostate HDR. The markers <strong>of</strong> CuSO4, C4, and Vitamin E on<br />
T1MRI and 1% AGEL, Saline, and fish oil on T2MRI showed higher than<br />
<strong>10</strong>0% signals on both phantoms. The volume effect on signals was<br />
found due to different marker volumes in the different dummy<br />
catheters. The markers <strong>of</strong> CuSO4 and Saline showed highest signals on<br />
T1MRI and T2MRI, respectively. Sourcereconstruction is<br />
recommended on T1MRI, so CuSO4 and C4 markers have great<br />
potentials as a dummy marker for both interstitial and intracavitary<br />
brachytherapy.<br />
: The use <strong>of</strong> interstitial markers for MRIguided prostate<br />
HDR seems feasible. The markers <strong>of</strong> CuSO4 and C4 showed<br />
considerably high signals on T1MRI, as did Saline on T2MRI, for<br />
interstitial needles for prostate HDR and for a tandemandring<br />
applicator for GYN.<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 137<br />
PO340<br />
DOSIMETRIC IMPACT OF NOT CORRECTING FOR THE DISTAL SHIFT<br />
REPORTED IN VARIAN TANDEM AND RING (T&R) APPLICATORS<br />
O. Craciunescu 1 , J. Sánchez Mazón 2 , L. Lan 3 , J. Maurer 1 , B. Steffey 1 ,<br />
J. Cai 1 , J. Adamson 1 , J. Chino 1<br />
1<br />
Duke University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Durham NC,<br />
USA<br />
2<br />
Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Servicio de Radi<strong>of</strong>ísica<br />
y Protección Radiológica, Santander, Spain<br />
3<br />
Duke University Medical Center, Department <strong>of</strong> Biostatistics and<br />
Bioinformatics, Durham NC, USA<br />
: Studies have shown that source stop positions<br />
within Varian’s HDR CT/MR compatible ring applicators can deviate<br />
from the intended positions by several millimeters, and that a<br />
corrective shift has to be applied to limit the effect <strong>of</strong> these inherent<br />
<strong>of</strong>fsets. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to investigate the dosimetric<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> NOT applying this correction.<br />
: Twentyseven HDR T&R clinical plans (cP)<br />
from six different patients treated for cervical cancer in our clinic<br />
were used in this study. Both CT and MR were acquired for each plan.<br />
The dose per fraction was 5.5 Gy. GECESTRO guidelines were<br />
followed for HRCTV and <strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OARs): bladder, rectum,<br />
sigmoid. ICRU 38 points A were also defined. The planning was done in<br />
BrachyVision with a hybrid volume optimization method based on<br />
HRCTV and ABS recommended reference lines. Depending on the<br />
shape <strong>of</strong> the HRCTV, the posterior ring dwell positions were allowed<br />
in the optimization for 5 patients. For 1 patient, a standard ring<br />
loading that mimicks ovoid placement was used. To show the<br />
dosimetric impact <strong>of</strong> NOT applying distal corrections, plans were<br />
generated by shifting the dwells in the ring in the opposite direction<br />
incrementally by 1 5 mm. The plans were calculated using the TG43<br />
formalism and ACUROS, a modelbased analytical solver that<br />
accounts for inhomogeneities. To establish clinical significance, the<br />
mean percent difference between all metrics in each <strong>of</strong> the shifted<br />
plans and the cP were calculated. The Wilcoxon signedrank test was<br />
used to determine if the differences have any statistical significance,<br />
for all cases together, but also separating patients depending on the<br />
ring dwells activated.<br />
: For brevity, only D2cc results for OARs for all 27 plans are<br />
presented. Ring loading strategy did not impact the dosmetric results.<br />
The mean percent differences between the largest shift (5mm) and<br />
the cP for the D2cc bladder, rectum and sigmoid were 1.6, 1.7, 2.5%<br />
for TG43, and 1.2, 1.8 and 1.4 % for ACUROS. The Wilcoxon rank sum<br />
pvalues were > 0.05 for all the OAR metrics, shift amounts, and<br />
method <strong>of</strong> calculation. For A_RT, A_LT and HRCTV D90, the mean<br />
percent differences were 0.8, 0.5 and 0.6 %, and 0.6, 0.8 and 0.9 %<br />
for TG43 and ACUROS, respectively. However, the Wilcoxon signed<br />
rank pvalues for Point A_RT were < 0.05 for both TG43 and ACUROS,<br />
for all shifts. Only when using ACUROS, the pvalues for HRCTV D90<br />
were < 0.05 for all shifts.<br />
: The dosimetric impact <strong>of</strong> NOT applying corrective shifts<br />
S138 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
measurements. The dose rate was calculated following a modification<br />
<strong>of</strong> the AAPM Task Group 61 protocol.<br />
: Azimuthal anisotropy measurements performed with film and<br />
TLD show good agreement as shown in Figure 1c. The TLD polar<br />
anisotropy measurements agree well with the MCNP5 predicted values<br />
as also shown in Figure 1d, but exhibit slight anisotropy not predicted<br />
by MCNP5. The DRC, as measured with the Exradin A16 chamber and<br />
corrected with egs_chamber simulations, was 0.536 cGyh 1 U 1 , which is<br />
8% higher than the previously measured TLD value.<br />
Figure 1: a. Film insert. b. Polar TLD insert. c. Azimuthal anisotropy<br />
results. d. Polar anisotropy results.<br />
: This phantom allows a convenient and practical means<br />
to measure azimuthal and polar anisotropy. It was also possible to<br />
measure the doserate constant with an ionization chamber, provided<br />
the appropriate corrections are made. This phantom allows users <strong>of</strong><br />
the Axxent system to easily verify the absorbed dose to water<br />
parameters <strong>of</strong> TG43 without the use <strong>of</strong> liquid water.<br />
PO343<br />
COMPARISION OF TG43 AND ACUROS DOSE CALCULATION ALGORITHM<br />
FOR VARIOUS APPLICATORS USED IN HDR GYN BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
J. Swamidas 1 , U. Mahantshetty 2 , S.K. Shrivatava 2 , D.D. Deshpande 1<br />
1 Tata Memorial Hospital, Medical Physics, Mumbai, India<br />
2 Tata Memorial Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Mumbai, India<br />
: The current brachytherapy dose calculation<br />
formalism assumes a homogeneous water medium that doesnot<br />
incorporate the effect <strong>of</strong> radiation scatter, tissue or applicator<br />
heterogeneities. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to quantify the<br />
dosimetric effects <strong>of</strong> tissue heterogeneities and various applicator<br />
materials used in HDR Gynaecological <strong>Brachytherapy</strong><br />
: Three series <strong>of</strong> CT images <strong>of</strong> patients<br />
undergoing HDR brachytherapy for cancer <strong>of</strong> uterine cervix were used<br />
for this retrospective analysis. Each <strong>of</strong> the CT image series was<br />
selected to have different applicator material. The applicators were<br />
a) Ring applicator made <strong>of</strong> stainless steel (SS) material b) Vienna<br />
Applicator made <strong>of</strong> plastic/polymer material and c) Tandem/Ovoid<br />
applicator made <strong>of</strong> Titanium. CT images <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> these applicators<br />
were transferred to the Treatment Planning System (Brachyvision<br />
v<strong>10</strong>). High Risk CTV, rectum, bladder and sigmoid were delineated<br />
based on GEC ESTRO recommendations. Two plans with 7Gy as dose<br />
prescription to HRCTV were generated for each image series. Dose<br />
calculation was carried out using TG43 and ACUROS dose calculation<br />
algorithm for Iridium192 HDR classic source (Nucletron). Dose volume<br />
parameters recommended by GEC ESTRO recommendations were<br />
calculated. In addition, volume receiving 50%, <strong>10</strong>0%, 200% and 400%<br />
isodose lines also were calculated to evaluate low and high dose<br />
variations. Dose to Point A, ICRU bladder and rectal point also were<br />
determined and used for this comparative analysis.<br />
: The table below shows the variation in dose to water in<br />
water as compared to heterogeneity corrected dose to tissue in tissue<br />
for different types <strong>of</strong> applicators. Average variation <strong>of</strong> all the dose<br />
volume parameters for applicator made from SS and Titanium<br />
material is 3.3 (±0.9)% and 3.1(± 1.1)% respectively as compared to<br />
polymer applicator <strong>of</strong> 1.2(± 0.9)% with ACUROS as compared to TG43.<br />
Also, the low dose region (V50%) has more variation as compared the<br />
high dose regions (V400%). For all the three applicators, it was found<br />
that TG43 formalism over estimates the dose as compared to ACUROS<br />
dose calculation algorithm.<br />
Parameters SS Polymer Titanium<br />
HRCTV D90 3.0 0.5 3.0<br />
HRCTV D<strong>10</strong>0 3.1 0.3 2.9<br />
HRCTV V<strong>10</strong>0 1.3 0.3 2.1<br />
BLD2cc 3.9 0.8 1.7<br />
RD2cc 3.4 0.5 4.5<br />
SD2cc 3.5 1.2 3.3<br />
ICRU BL 2.4 1.5 2.9<br />
ICRU R 3.9 3.0 4.0<br />
V50% 4.8 0.5 4.5<br />
V<strong>10</strong>0% 4.1 0.5 4.2<br />
V200% 3.6 1.7 3.8<br />
V400% 4.0 3.0 2.8<br />
PTA RT 2.8 1.5 1.8<br />
PTA LT 2.0 1.7 1.2<br />
: The present study is an attempt to quantify the<br />
applicator and tissue heterogeneities for commonly used applicators<br />
in realistic conditions related to HDR Gynecological <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>.<br />
The TG 43 algorithm overestimates the doses as compared to ACUROS.<br />
The magnitude <strong>of</strong> variation depends on the applicator material with<br />
highest for applicators made <strong>of</strong> stainless steel and titanium and least<br />
for polymer material. Defining applicator material and incorporating<br />
anticipated variations may further add to existing quality assurance<br />
program for GYN <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> planning.<br />
PO344<br />
INVIVO DOSIMETRY IN HDR BRACHYTHERAPY: THE EFFECT OF<br />
TEMPERATURE VARIATION AND SIMULATED POSITION CHANGES<br />
O. Hayman 1 , A. Palmer 2 , S. Williams 1<br />
1<br />
Queen Alexandra Hospital, Medical Physics Department, Portsmouth,<br />
United Kingdom<br />
2<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Surrey, Medical Physics Department & Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />
Engineering and Physical Science, Guildford, United Kingdom<br />
: Invivo dosimetry provides real time feedback on<br />
patient set up and <strong>org</strong>an at risk dosimetry for both rectum and<br />
bladder at treatment. Clinical studies had demonstrated the need for<br />
further characterisation and a full understanding <strong>of</strong> the diode system<br />
functionality. [1]<br />
This study aimed to characterise the use <strong>of</strong> diodes in Co60 cervical<br />
cancer treatment using the HDR MultiSource (Eckert & Ziegler BEBIG)<br />
with integrated diodes (PTW). Temperature dependence <strong>of</strong> the diode<br />
response was assessed at typical calibration (room) temperature<br />
(22.8 o C) and internal rectal temperature (34.4 – 37.8 o C) for bladder<br />
and rectal dosimetry systems. Effects <strong>of</strong> positional uncertainty were<br />
evaluated with a treatment planning study correlating measured and<br />
predicted doses.<br />
[1] Invivo dosimetry for gynaecological brachytherapy: physical and<br />
clinical considerations, Wadhäusl C et al 2005<br />
: 20 patient's CT images were used to<br />
determine the mean position <strong>of</strong> the rectal and bladder invivo diodes.<br />
corresponding to planning ref points, in relation to the HDR<br />
applicator. An inhouse jig was designed for the Eckert & Ziegler split<br />
ring and IUT applicator in water. The stability and reproducibility <strong>of</strong><br />
the rectal and bladder diode system was assessed at calibration<br />
temperature <strong>of</strong> 22.8 o C. The temperature was elevated to a maximum<br />
37 o C and change in response <strong>of</strong> the rectal and bladder probes<br />
determined. The diode immersion time at the higher temperature was<br />
representative <strong>of</strong> clinical use within the patient. A treatment planning<br />
study was conducted to assess the maximum position uncertainty,<br />
using the range <strong>of</strong> dose difference established in the rectal and<br />
bladder diode measurements. Each diode's dose range was plotted<br />
separately and compared with the volume doses for both rectum and<br />
bladder.<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 139<br />
: The mean rectal diode dose was 2.8 Gy (sd 0.04) compared<br />
to planned dose 2.5Gy. The mean bladder diode dose was 4.0 Gy (sd<br />
0.05) with planned dose 3.9 Gy. At the elevated body temperature,<br />
rectal dose was 2.8 Gy (sd 0.01) and bladder dose 4.1 Gy (sd 0.05).<br />
The difference in predicted to measured readings ranged from 0.2 to<br />
0.4 Gy for the bladder and rectal diodes individually. Applying this<br />
dose range to each diode position on the treatment plan, the largest<br />
positional uncertainty was ±7.5mm with a dose range <strong>of</strong> ±0.3Gy.<br />
The bladder diode dose correlated well with the D2cc for the bladder<br />
<strong>of</strong> 3.9Gy but the rectal diodes correlated better with D5cc <strong>of</strong> 3.3Gy.<br />
: Stability and reproducibility are clinically acceptable for<br />
this integrated diode system. No diode sensitivity variation with<br />
temperature was observed in typical clinical conditions. The<br />
Positioning <strong>of</strong> the diodes is <strong>of</strong> primary concern for accurate use and<br />
correlation to treatment planning reference points. Image guidance<br />
during treatment and retrospective planning using DRRs must be<br />
utilised to fully exploit the usefulness <strong>of</strong> the diodes.<br />
PO345<br />
INTERSEED ATTENUATION IN PROSTATE I<strong>12</strong>5 SEED IMPLANT<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY: EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL INVESTIGATION<br />
P. Bownes 1 , J. Mason 1 , B. AlQaisieh 1 , A. Henry 2 , D. Thwaites 3<br />
1<br />
St James Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS<br />
Trust, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics, Leeds, United Kingdom<br />
2<br />
St James Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS<br />
Trust, Clinical Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom<br />
3<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Institute <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics School <strong>of</strong> Physics,<br />
Sydney, Australia<br />
: In prostate permanent seed implant<br />
brachytherapy the actual dose delivered to the patient may be less<br />
than that calculated by TG43 due to interseed attenuation (ISA). In<br />
this study Monte Carlo (MC) simulation is used to quantify ISA.<br />
Experimental verification <strong>of</strong> MC simulation results is performed using<br />
a MOSFET dosimeter. 15 post implant treatment plans are simulated<br />
to quantify the clinical effects <strong>of</strong> ISA. Results for the Oncura 6711 and<br />
Thinseed seed models are compared. Thinseed has the same design as<br />
the well known 6711 model but has 0.5mm diameter compared to<br />
0.8mm for 6711 and a correspondingly thinner radioopaque marker.<br />
: Dose measurements using a MOSFET in a<br />
Perspex phantom for an implant <strong>of</strong> 36 seeds were compared to MC<br />
simulation results. For the clinical study, 15 recently treated CT based<br />
post implant plans were simulated using both 6711 and Thinseed. 7<br />
patients were treated with standard activity seeds (0.458U) and 8<br />
patients were treated with lower activity seeds (average 0.396U). ISA<br />
was quantified by comparing DVH values for full MC simulation<br />
(includes the ISA effect) to an MC superposition dose calculated using<br />
single seed MC simulation results (ignores the ISA effect). DVH<br />
calculation code was benchmarked by comparing MC superposition<br />
dose to output from Variseed using source data calculated from single<br />
seed MC simulation, and to output from Variseed using TG43U1<br />
consensus source data.<br />
: MC simulation results were validated by MOSFET<br />
measurements although difficulties included variability in repeat<br />
readings at low dose rates and drift in MOSFET calibration response.<br />
The mean ISA effect on DVH parameters (calculated from the<br />
difference between full MC simulation and MC superposition), for the<br />
15 clinical post implant plans using the 6711 seed was prostate: D90 <br />
2.8%, V<strong>10</strong>0 1.4%, V150 5.3%; urethra D<strong>10</strong> 2.5%, V150 14%; rectum<br />
D2cc 4.4% V<strong>10</strong>0 25%. For the Thinseed the ISA effect was lower with<br />
mean values for prostate: D90 1.6%, V<strong>10</strong>0 0.8%, V150 3.2%; urethra<br />
D<strong>10</strong> 1.4%, V150 8%; rectum D2cc 2.5% V<strong>10</strong>0 15%. DVH benchmarking<br />
work showed that that the difference between single source MC<br />
simulation and TG43U1 consensus parameters for the 6711 seed had a<br />
slightly larger effect on DVH parameters than ISA: for example for the<br />
prostate average differences were D90 4.2%, V<strong>10</strong>0 2.0%, V150 7.6%.<br />
There was little difference in ISA effects between the standard<br />
activity and lower activity groups <strong>of</strong> patients.<br />
: Experimental validation <strong>of</strong> MC simulation <strong>of</strong> complex I<br />
<strong>12</strong>5 seed arrangements is feasible. ISA causes DVH values for clinical I<br />
<strong>12</strong>5 seed implants to be lower compared to TG43 dose calculations.<br />
ISA effects are reduced for a seed model that is less attenuating.<br />
PO346<br />
MEASUREMENTS AROUND AN ELECTRONIC BRACHYTHERAPY SOURCE<br />
USING LITHIUM FORMATE EPR DOSIMETERS AND GAFCHROMIC FILM<br />
E. Adolfsson 1 , S. White 2 , G. Landry 2 , G. Alm Carlsson 1 , H. Gustafsson 1 ,<br />
E. Lund 1 , B. Reniers 2 , F. Verhaegen 2 , A. Carlsson Tedgren 3<br />
1<br />
Linköping University, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical and Health Sciences<br />
(IMH) Radiation Physics, Linköping, Sweden<br />
2<br />
Maastricht University Medical Center, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />
Oncology (MAASTRO) GROW School for Oncology and Developmental<br />
Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands<br />
3<br />
Swedish Radiation Safety Authority, (SSM), Stockholm, Sweden<br />
: In this work, the aim was to test two different<br />
dosimetry systems, lithium formate EPR dosimeters and GafChromic<br />
film for dose verification measurements around a 50 kV X<strong>of</strong>t Axxent<br />
source.<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> electronic xray brachytherapy sources (EBS) has increased as<br />
an alternative to radionuclides in brachytherapy. The low energy (50<br />
kV) in combination with the steep dose gradient around the EBS makes<br />
it difficult to perform accurate dose verification measurements. It is<br />
<strong>of</strong> great interest to identify dosimetry systems that are capable <strong>of</strong><br />
performing absolute dosimetric measurements around such sources.<br />
One option is to use solid state detectors which can be made small<br />
enough to resolve the gradients. Both lithium formate EPR (electron<br />
paramagnetic resonance) dosimeters and GafChromic film are<br />
potentially suitable for this purpose.<br />
To determine absorbed dose to water, calibration in a well known<br />
radiation quality that provides traceability to a primary standard is<br />
needed. The calibration radiation quality can be similar to that under<br />
investigation but is most <strong>of</strong>ten a MV or 60 Co field as suggested by the<br />
AAPM TG43U1 for absolute dosimetry using LiF TLDs. When<br />
calibrating dosimeters in a different radiation quality than used for<br />
measurements, a correction for the different intrinsic response, fLET<br />
(caused by different ionization densities (LET) <strong>of</strong> the secondary<br />
electrons) is needed for highest accuracy in results.<br />
: Measurements were performed in a PMMA<br />
phantom. Four EPR dosimeters (cylinders with height 5 mm, diameter<br />
4.5 mm) were positioned radially with their centers at 3 and 5 cm<br />
from the EBS. GafChromic film was positioned on top <strong>of</strong> the EPR<br />
dosimeters. The EPR dosimeters were calibrated in a MV photon beam<br />
and the film in a well characterized 50 kV xray beam.<br />
The dose to film was evaluated with the triple channel method using<br />
an Epson v700 film scanner and the manufacturer’s (ISP) s<strong>of</strong>tware,<br />
FILMQA pro. The EPR dosimeters were read out in a BRUKER EleXsys<br />
E580 spectrometer with a standard cavity ER 4<strong>10</strong>2ST.<br />
To determine absorbed dose to water in the PMMA phantom at a<br />
certain distance r from the source, correction for the volume<br />
averaging effect in the EPR dosimeters was obtained from Monte Carlo<br />
(MC) simulations. MC simulations were also used to account for the<br />
different positions <strong>of</strong> the EPR dosimeters and the Gafchromic film in<br />
the phantom.<br />
: Absorbed doses to water in the phantom determined by the<br />
lithium formate EPR dosimeters agreed with the absorbed doses<br />
determined by the films within the estimated uncertainties and<br />
differences were less than <strong>10</strong>%.<br />
: The results from the two dosimetry systems conform to<br />
a high degree <strong>of</strong> certainty which indicates that they are suitable for<br />
this application.<br />
PO347<br />
ARE TISSUE AND APPLICATOR HETEROGENEITIES EFFECT IMPORTANT IN<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY TPS? A REAL CASE<br />
A. Pereira 1 , R. Pirraco 1 , T. Viterbo 1 , L. Salgado 2 , L. Carvalho 2 , L.<br />
Trigo 2 , J. Lencart 1<br />
1<br />
Instituto Português de Oncologia, Fisica Médica, Porto, Portugal<br />
2<br />
Instituto Português de Oncologia, Serviço Braquiterapia, Porto,<br />
Portugal<br />
: The aim <strong>of</strong> this work is to quantify the difference<br />
in delivered dose when different types <strong>of</strong> cylindrical applicators are<br />
used in gynaecological brachytherapy, considering that the Treatment<br />
Planning System (TPS) algorithm do not have heterogeneities<br />
correction.<br />
: In our department endometrial tumours are
S140 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
treated with two types <strong>of</strong> commercial cylindrical applicators: the<br />
Vaginal Applicator Set and the Shielded Cylindrical Applicator Set for<br />
high dose rate brachytherapy, from Nucletron. The former type has<br />
massive structure and the later is hollow, allowing the introduction <strong>of</strong><br />
tungsten shielding (which we do not normally use). CT image based<br />
plans are performed and the dose prescription points are located at<br />
0,5 cm from the applicator surface. As our TPS (Oncentra Masterplan<br />
4.1) does not take into account medium heterogeneities, there is a<br />
difference between the calculated and delivered doses at the<br />
prescription points when either type <strong>of</strong> applicator is used.<br />
To evaluate these differences, we performed the HDR treatments<br />
(Nucletron microSelectron V3) on a phantom, with both types <strong>of</strong><br />
cylinders, with 3,0 cm and 3,5 cm diameters, and measured the<br />
delivered dose along the prescription points with a five Mosfet array<br />
(TN 252LA5 MOSFET, Best Medical Canada).<br />
: We observed a difference between the doses delivered at the<br />
prescription points with the Vaginal Applicator Set and Shielded<br />
Cylindrical Applicator <strong>of</strong> 5.4% for the 3.0cm cylinders and 5.2% for the<br />
3.5cm cylinders.<br />
: The obtained results suggest that further investigations<br />
are made, specially if we consider using the tungsten shielding. The<br />
use <strong>of</strong> an algorithm with heterogeneity correction is <strong>of</strong> high<br />
importance.<br />
Further work will be done in order to validate these results with<br />
Monte Carlo simulations.<br />
PO348<br />
EVALUATION OF THE TRACHEA INHOMOGENETY EFFECT ON DOSE<br />
CALCULATIONS OF ESOPHAGUS HDR BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
S.M. Hosseini Daghigh 1 , R. Jaberi 2 , S.R. Mahdavi 2 , S.M.R. Aghamiri 1 , H.<br />
Baghani 1 , E. Boroghani 3 , R. Eidi 1<br />
1<br />
Shahid Baheshty University, Radiation Medicine, Tehran, Iran Islamic<br />
Republic <strong>of</strong><br />
2<br />
Tehran University <strong>of</strong> Medical Science, medical physics, Tehran, Iran<br />
Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong><br />
3<br />
Guilan University, physics, Tehran, Iran Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong><br />
: Dose calculations in esophagus High Dose Rate<br />
(HDR) <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> treatment planning systems (TPS) are greatly<br />
based on TG43 protocol which in, all materials are considered to be<br />
water equivalent.<br />
Regarding to Locating the trachea near the esophagus and considering<br />
the air inside it equivalent to water in TPS may introduce a<br />
considerable error in dose calculations.<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> this research is surveying the effect <strong>of</strong> air within trachea<br />
on dose calculations <strong>of</strong> Flexiplan TPS in esophagus HDR<br />
brachytherapy.<br />
: To do so, we used a cylindrical PMMA<br />
phantom with a tube in the center (esophagus equivalent) with 20mm<br />
diameter and a tube in 24mm distance from the center (trachea<br />
equivalent) with 18mm diameter and the PMMA cylinders with<br />
external diameter <strong>of</strong> 20mm and a hole with diameter that was equal<br />
to the external diameter <strong>of</strong> each applicator was created within it, so<br />
that the thickness <strong>of</strong> the thinnest part <strong>of</strong> the wall in each cylinder was<br />
1 mm. the structure <strong>of</strong> described phantom has been shown in<br />
following figure.<br />
Esophagus brachytherapy applicators with various diameters (6, 8, <strong>10</strong><br />
and 20mm) were placed into related cylinders and finally inserted in<br />
esophagus tube. The irradiation was performed using Flexitron remote<br />
afterloading system. In this system, HDR implants are achived by<br />
moving a single high strength Ir192 source. Associated Treatment<br />
planning system with this afterloading unit is Flexiplan that was used<br />
to design treatment plan that loads a special dose at interested<br />
points.<br />
EDR2 radiography films were used for dosimetry at reference point in<br />
esophagus HDR brachytherapy (between esophagus and trachea wall <br />
14mm distance from center) and posterior wall <strong>of</strong> trachea (33mm<br />
distance from center).<br />
: The results <strong>of</strong> treatment planning and practical dosimetry (2<br />
times measurements) in mentioned positions have been showed in the<br />
following table. Difference between acquired results has been showed<br />
too.<br />
: The results show that there is a meaningful difference<br />
between practical dosimetry and treatment planning results (Pvalue<br />
S142 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
measurements which however showed much reduced values (in<br />
Sv/hr) are a consequence <strong>of</strong> structural shielding by concrete walls<br />
and leadembedded doors.<br />
: It is essential to include checks <strong>of</strong> radiation levels in<br />
treatment and control rooms in daily quality assurance tests.<br />
Measurements while source position indicator was in use were<br />
comparable to corresponding irradiation values with ring applicators<br />
in patients. Therefore, radiation readings during source visual test<br />
should be given necessary attention as typical <strong>of</strong> likely measurements<br />
when brachytherapy irradiation <strong>of</strong> patients is actually in progress.<br />
PO352<br />
MODULATION RESTRICTIONS DO NOT NECESSARILY IMPROVE<br />
TREATMENT PLAN QUALITY FOR HDR PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
M. Balvert 1 , B. Gorissen 1 , D. den Hertog 1 , A. H<strong>of</strong>fmann 2<br />
1<br />
Tilburg University, Dept. Econometrics and Operations Research,<br />
Tilburg, The Netherlands<br />
2<br />
MAASTRO Clinic, Medical Physics, Maastricht, The Netherlands<br />
: Inverse optimization algorithms in interstitial<br />
HDR prostate brachytherapy may produce solutions with large dwell<br />
time variations within catheters. An undesirable property is that<br />
dominant dwell positions result in selective highdose volumes (i.e.,<br />
hot spots). A dwell time modulation restriction (DTMR) has been<br />
suggested and is used in planning s<strong>of</strong>tware to eliminate this problem.<br />
Additionally, such DTMRs are used to reduce the sensitivity for<br />
uncertainties in dwell positions that inevitably result from catheter<br />
reconstruction errors and source positioning inaccuracy <strong>of</strong> the<br />
afterloader. The aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to quantify the reduction <strong>of</strong> hot<br />
spots and the robustness against these uncertainties by applying a<br />
DTMR to templatebased HDR prostate brachytherapy implants.<br />
: For catheter reconstruction, the<br />
measurement error in defining the tip was estimated to be 2 mm in<br />
any direction. An additional error due to the source positioning<br />
inaccuracy <strong>of</strong> the afterloader (±1 mm) was considered separately.<br />
Three different DTMRs were consecutively applied to existing dose<br />
based and dosevolume based optimization models, limiting the<br />
relative differences, absolute differences, or summed squared<br />
differences between neighboring dwell positions. The models were<br />
solved for various restriction levels, ranging from no restriction to<br />
uniform dwell times within catheters. The errors were simulated<br />
uniformly at least 1.000 times on representative clinical cases. For<br />
each resulting dose distribution, hot spot indices and DVH statistics<br />
for the PTV, rectum and urethra were computed. These indices<br />
comprise global and local measures, respectively given by the dose<br />
homogeneity index (DHI) computed as (V<strong>10</strong>0V150)/V<strong>10</strong>0, and the newly<br />
introduced V150c, being the largest contiguous volume receiving 150%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the prescribed dose.<br />
: None <strong>of</strong> the DTMRs could improve the nominal value,<br />
simulated sample mean or variance <strong>of</strong> DHI or V150c without<br />
simultaneously reducing V<strong>10</strong>0. Moreover, the simulated sample<br />
variance <strong>of</strong> V<strong>10</strong>0 was not decreased by any DTMR. Preliminary results<br />
for the afterloader inaccuracy are consistent with these results.<br />
: No improvement in robustness against uncertainty in<br />
dwell position measurement and afterloader precision was obtained<br />
by applying a DTMR for the dosebased and dosevolume based<br />
optimization models. We recommend not to use any <strong>of</strong> the three<br />
DTMRs for inverse treatment planning optimization in HDR prostate<br />
brachytherapy implants.<br />
PO353<br />
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE HDR CAPRIÔ APPLICATOR<br />
B. Steffey 1 , O. Craciunescu 1 , J. Cai 1 , J. Adamson 1 , J. Chino 1<br />
1<br />
Duke University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Durham NC,<br />
USA<br />
: The Capri applicator (Varian Corp.) is a new<br />
HDR CTcompatible brachytherapy (BT) applicator marketed to better<br />
sculpt the radiotherapy dose and improve patient comfort. It is a 13<br />
catheter balloon that is inflated upon insertion to conform to patient's<br />
anatomy. In this study we characterize this applicator by investigating<br />
the dosimetry as it compares with a stump vaginal cylinder, and the<br />
manufacturer's stated relative catheter positions.<br />
: Six patients received HDR brachytherapy<br />
using the Capri applicator for the treatment <strong>of</strong> vaginal (4), recurrent<br />
endometrial (1), and recurrent ovarian (1) cancers involving the<br />
vagina. All patients received external beam radiation therapy<br />
followed by 5 Gy x 45 fractions <strong>of</strong> HDR BT. For each insertion,<br />
MR/CTbased HRCTV volumes were delineated for treatment planning.<br />
GECESTRO guidelines were followed for dose volume constraints for<br />
the <strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OARs): bladder, rectum, sigmoid and bowel. The<br />
planning was done in BrachyVision using the volume optimization<br />
technique. Depending on the HRCTV shape and location, 411<br />
catheters were used. Plans were calculated using the TG43 formalism<br />
and with ACUROS, a modelbased analytical solver that accounts for<br />
tissue inhomogeneities. Retrospectively, for dosimetry comparison,<br />
planning was also done using a 3.5 cm stump cylinder(SC) with the<br />
dose prescribed at 0.5 cm in tissue. HRCTV D90, bladder, rectum,<br />
sigmoid and bowel D2cc were compared between the two plans<br />
(CAPRI vs SC). Twentyeight CAPRI applicators were imaged after<br />
TX and the relative positions between the distal ends <strong>of</strong> the catheters<br />
were measured and compared to manufacturer's stated values: 2 mm<br />
from central catheter to outer ring, and <strong>10</strong> mm from outer ring to<br />
inner ring.<br />
: The 3.5 cm SC could be used on only 22/29 fractions. The<br />
mean percent differences in HRCTV D90, and D2cc for bladder,<br />
rectum, sigmoid and bowel between the Capri, used as reference,r<br />
and SC were, respectively: 19%±14, 39%± 29, 59%±44, 58%±37, and<br />
41%±32 for TG43. Similar differences were found when ACUROS was<br />
used. For the Capri plans, the mean differences between TG43 and<br />
ACUROS for the same metrics were: 1.8%±0.5, 2.3%±0.6, 2.6%±0.6,<br />
3.5%±1.1, and 3.4%±1.5 The distal measurements ranged 2.0 to 7.0<br />
mm (avg 4.1 mm) from central catheter to outer ring, and 7.1 to <strong>10</strong>.2<br />
mm (avg 8.3 mm) from outer ring to inner ring.<br />
: The new CAPRI applicator has several advantages: 1)<br />
better dose coverage for asymmetric and deep (> 0.5 cm) targets; 2)<br />
better OARs sparing; 3) increased patient comfort and immobilization<br />
due conformity to the vaginal vault. For catheter identification<br />
purposes, it is important for the user to be aware <strong>of</strong> the differences<br />
between the manufacturer's stated relative positions <strong>of</strong> the catheters<br />
and individual production CAPRIs. Air in the balloon, when accounted<br />
for with ACUROS, impacts modestly on the dose metrics.<br />
PO354<br />
DOSIMETRIC IMPACTS OF UPGRADING FROM PLATO TO<br />
ONCENTRABRACHY IN A HIGH VOLUME PROSTATE HDR BRACHY<br />
THERAPY CENTER<br />
F. Lacroix 1 , J. Morrier 1 , M.C. Lavallée 1 , S. Aubin 1 , W. Foster 1 , A.G.<br />
Martin 1 , E. Vigneault 1 , N. Varfalvy 1 , L. Beaulieu 1<br />
1 CHUQ, Radiooncologie, Québec, Canada<br />
: To investigate the dosimetric impacts <strong>of</strong><br />
upgrading from Plato to OncentraBrachy for HDR prostate planning.<br />
: CHUQ is one <strong>of</strong> the highest volume prostate<br />
HDR brachytherapy centers in North America today. More than 800<br />
prostate cancer patients have been treated with an HDR<br />
brachytherapy boost at HôtelDieu de Québec (CHUQ) since 1999 and<br />
more than 200 in 2011 only.<br />
Our current procedure involves the insertion <strong>of</strong> 1617 flexible plastic<br />
needles using ultrasound guidance. Computed tomography imaging is<br />
used for contouring. Planning was performed using Plato (Nucletron,<br />
BV, The Netherlands) until june 1 2011 but is now performed using<br />
OncentraBrachy. Inverse planning simulated annealing optimization is<br />
used for all cases. 81 patients were accrued from January 1 2011 to<br />
June 1 2011 and treated with Plato and 1<strong>12</strong> patients were treated<br />
from June 15 2011 to November 8 2011 using Oncentra. In this period,<br />
there were no modifications in the implant procedure itself, to the<br />
prescription dose, the contouring methods, or in the personnel<br />
performing the implant. Student’s ttest was performed on relevant<br />
dosimetric indices <strong>of</strong> the distributions to determine whether the<br />
averages <strong>of</strong> the distributions were different between the two periods.<br />
An Ftest was also performed to determine whether the standard<br />
deviation <strong>of</strong> the distributions were significantly different. In addition,<br />
where differences where statistically significant (p
S144 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
PO357<br />
DOSIMETRIC IMPLICATIONS TO VAGINAL SURFACE DOSE OF PLANNING<br />
OPTIMIZATION METHODS<br />
A. Damato 1 , K. Townamchai 1 , A. Viswanathan 1<br />
1<br />
DanaFarber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital,<br />
Radiation Oncology, Boston, USA<br />
: Highdoserate vaginal cylinder (VC)<br />
brachytherapy is a widely used technique for the management <strong>of</strong><br />
postoperative endometrial cancer. Differences exist in prescription<br />
and optimization methodologies for VC brachytherapy. This is a<br />
dosimetric evaluation <strong>of</strong> two common VC brachytherapy optimization<br />
techniques.<br />
: Records <strong>of</strong> 15 postoperative endometrial<br />
cancer patients who recently received adjuvant VC brachytherapy in<br />
our clinic were retrospectively analyzed. For all patients, a dose <strong>of</strong> 4<br />
Gy per fraction was prescribed to the surface <strong>of</strong> the VC; 4 to 6<br />
fractions were administered. The CT scan <strong>of</strong> the first fraction was<br />
used to generate 2 3D plans: 1 with optimization dose points along the<br />
surface <strong>of</strong> the VC and tapered along the dome (TP), and 1 with dose<br />
points at a fixed distance from the cylinder center (NTP) equal to the<br />
cylinder radius. The dwell times were automatically optimized in the<br />
Oncentra Brachy Planning System so that average dose to the dose<br />
points was equal to 4 Gy. The source step size was 0.5 cm. Organs at<br />
risk (OARs) (i.e., bladder [BD], rectum [R], sigmoid [S] and bowel<br />
[BW]) were contoured when present in the CT scan and the D0.1cc<br />
and D2cc per fraction were calculated. Dose per fraction to the dome<br />
(DD) was calculated at the most superior dose point along the VC<br />
dome for both TP and NTP. Significance was evaluated with a paired<br />
student Ttest; pvalues
S146 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
segmentation <strong>of</strong> the target volume and <strong>of</strong> <strong>org</strong>ans at risk (OAR).<br />
Cornea, eye lens, sclera, papilla, optic nerve and lacrimal gland were<br />
considered.<br />
: In order to simulate an actual treatment it was assumed that<br />
the plaques in each <strong>of</strong> the positions were irradiating 4 mm height<br />
tumours. A dose <strong>of</strong> 700 Gy to the sclera was prescribed. As an<br />
example, the DVHs obtained for the papilla are presented in the<br />
figure. The lines from right to left correspond to CCA in posterior<br />
position, CCB equatorial, CCA equatorial and CCA anterior.<br />
<br />
: For the first time it has been possible to simulate an<br />
accurate geometry <strong>of</strong> an eye plaque inside the voxelised geometry <strong>of</strong><br />
a patient. This mixed quadric and voxelised geometry simulation<br />
approach, together with a segmented CT, allows calculating DVHs for<br />
relevant anatomical structures <strong>of</strong> the eye and the orbit obtaining<br />
unprecedented accurate information on absorbed dose applied to<br />
OARs. This is an important step for further optimization <strong>of</strong><br />
brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> ocular tumours.<br />
PO362<br />
QUALITY ASSURANCE OF TREATMENT PLANS IN HDR/PDR<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY. A METHOD OF VERIFYING CALCULATED TREATMENT<br />
TIMES<br />
A. With 1 , L. Karlsson 1<br />
1 Örebro University Hospital, Medical Physics, Örebro, Sweden<br />
: In brachytherapy there are many different<br />
treatment sites, e.g uterine cervix, head & neck and breast. For each<br />
afterloading technique there are variations in implant size, number <strong>of</strong><br />
catheters and type <strong>of</strong> applicators used, as well as the number <strong>of</strong><br />
active dwell positions. With every unique implant the configuration <strong>of</strong><br />
catheters varies; singlelayered, multilayered, different separations<br />
etc. Different optimization techniques such as geometrical and<br />
anatomical are available. There are also various ways <strong>of</strong><br />
normalization, choice <strong>of</strong> prescription points and different dose<br />
prescriptions. In a clinical situation, usually with little time between<br />
planning and delivery, estimation <strong>of</strong> the validity <strong>of</strong> the total<br />
treatment time given by the planning s<strong>of</strong>tware can prove difficult.<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to develop a method for quick verification<br />
that the treatment time for an implant dose calculation is reasonable<br />
within ± 15% (2σ).<br />
: Material consisting <strong>of</strong> data from 395<br />
treatments, both HDR (150 uterine cervix) and PDR (45 lip, <strong>12</strong>5 base<br />
<strong>of</strong> tongue & 75 breast) were evaluated. All PDRimplants were<br />
performed with flexible plastic tubes and for the HDR treatments <strong>of</strong><br />
the uterine cervix the ring applicator with or without needles was<br />
used. The volume encompassed by the <strong>10</strong>0% isodose was analyzed<br />
together with the prescribed dose D (Gy), total radiation time T<br />
(seconds) and reference air kerma rate RAKR (mGy m 2 h 1 ) at the time<br />
<strong>of</strong> treatment. The data was normalized to 1 Gy and a RAKR <strong>of</strong> 40.7<br />
mGy m 2 h 1 . Parametric fits were applied to each group individually as<br />
well as a common fit for all the data. A nonlinear equation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
form f(x)=a x b was used in each case. Using the relations TRAK=a Vol b<br />
and TRAK=T RAKR/3600 we end up with the expression T=<br />
3600 a Vol b /RAKR relating treatment time with isodose volume.<br />
: Considering the common fit, approximately 95% (2σ) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
data points falls within ±11%. For the individual treatment sites, lip,<br />
base <strong>of</strong> tongue, breast and uterine cervix, the differences between<br />
individual fits and the common fit were negligible. The deviation from<br />
the common fit was ±<strong>12</strong>%, ±7%, ±14% and ±6% respectively. The R<br />
square values <strong>of</strong> the fits were 0.99 (all data) and 0.98, 0.99, 0.94,<br />
0.99 individually. The coefficients for the common fit were a=7.82 <strong>10</strong> <br />
4<br />
and b = 0.634 which yields the final <br />
T=114.5 Vol 0.634 D/RAKR.<br />
: For future HDR/PDR treatments, it is possible to verify<br />
the calculated treatment time within 15% (95% confidence level) using<br />
a parametric fit from earlier treatment data. The expression for the<br />
common fit can be used for all implants.<br />
<br />
PO363<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY IN THE HEAD AND NECK REGION USING INDIVIDUAL<br />
APPLICATORS A TECHNICAL NOTE<br />
M. Niewald 1 , S. Richard 1 , N. Licht 1 , M.H. Schneider 2 , K. Bumm 3 , J.<br />
Fleckenstein 1 , C. Ruebe 1<br />
1<br />
Saarland University Hospital, Dept. <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy and<br />
Radiooncology, Homburg/Saar, Germany<br />
2<br />
Epithetic Institute, Dept.Zweibrücken, Zweibruecken, Germany<br />
3<br />
Saarland University Hospital, Dept. <strong>of</strong> Otorhinolaryngology,<br />
Homburg/Saar, Germany<br />
: The dose that can be applied safely especially to<br />
the upper nose or the nasopharynx is <strong>of</strong>ten limited due to the<br />
tolerance <strong>of</strong> critical structures like eye, optic nerve or optic chiasm.<br />
Furthermore, air within the nose or the paranasal sinuses pr<strong>events</strong> an<br />
exact planning <strong>of</strong> dose distribution. Thus, we combined 3D or IMRT<br />
percutaneous radiotherapy with brachytherapy using individual<br />
applicators.<br />
: Impressions <strong>of</strong> the region to be irradiated are<br />
taken by a epithetician, if necessary under general anesthesia.<br />
Silicone applicators are formed from these impressions with the<br />
brachytherapy lines inserted in the predefined position .Usually after<br />
completion <strong>of</strong> percutaneous radiotherapy the applicators are inserted.<br />
The brachytherapy lines are marked by metal wires, a CT is<br />
performed, after identification <strong>of</strong> the lines and coutouring <strong>of</strong> the PTV<br />
the 3Disodose distribution is computed by the physicist (mainly<br />
Masterplan, Nucletron BV, Venendaal, The Netherlands). The tubes<br />
are connected to the radiotherapy device (mainly MicroSelectron,<br />
Nucletron BV, Venendaal, The Netherlands), radiotherapy is applied.<br />
Finally, the applicators are removed.<br />
: 15 patients have been treated using individual applicators.<br />
The target volume consisted <strong>of</strong> the nasopharyxnx in 7 patients, the<br />
nose in further 5, the remaining patients were treated for tumors <strong>of</strong><br />
the orbit (1), the paranasal sinuses (1) and the external ear (1). After<br />
a percutaneous radiotherapy <strong>of</strong> 5060Gy (single fractions <strong>of</strong> 2Gy) a<br />
brachytherapy dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> – 20Gy in 2 – 4 daily fractions to the isodose<br />
surrounding the PTV was applied.<br />
The applicators fitted well to the patients´ target regions. The 3D<br />
plan showed that the dose distribution could be easily tailored to the<br />
tumor localization and the patient´s individual anatomy so that a<br />
highquality implant could be achieved in all patients. The vast<br />
majority <strong>of</strong> the patients coped well with this therapy, the anesthetic<br />
procedures could be performed without problems. The costs for an<br />
applicator amount to € 800 – <strong>12</strong>00.<br />
: To our opinion this method is suitable for difficult<br />
brachytherapy applications to the head and neck region and may be<br />
superior to commercially available nasopharynx applicators.<br />
Nevertheless, we have to admit that the method is rather time<br />
consuming and costly.<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 147<br />
PO364<br />
FIRST EXPERIENCE WITH HIGHDOSE RATE INTERSTITIAL BRACHY<br />
THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF PENILE CARCINOMA<br />
J. Petera 1 , I. Sirak 1 , L. Kasaova 1 , P. Paluska 1<br />
1 Charles University Medical School and Teaching Hospital in Hradec<br />
Kralove, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Hradec Kralove, Czech<br />
Republic<br />
: Interstitial lowdose rate (LDR) brachytherapy<br />
allows a conservative treatment <strong>of</strong> T1T2 penile carcinoma. Highdose<br />
rate (HDR) brachytherapy is <strong>of</strong>ten considered as a dangerous method<br />
for interstitial implants because <strong>of</strong> higher risk <strong>of</strong> complications.<br />
However, numerous reports suggest that results <strong>of</strong> HDR brachytherapy<br />
may be comparable to LDR. We present our first experience with HDR<br />
brachytherapy in the treatment <strong>of</strong> penile cancer.<br />
: Thirteen patients with early penile carcinoma<br />
were treated by interstitial HDR brachytherapy at the dose <strong>of</strong> 18<br />
times 3 Gy twice daily between years 2002 and 2011. Breast<br />
interstitial brachytherapy template was used for fixation and precise<br />
geometry reconstruction <strong>of</strong> stainless hollow needles. Median follow up<br />
was 37 months (4.5 – 115).<br />
: Our brachytherapy technique and fractionation schedule was<br />
well tolerated by all patients. Acute reaction consisted predominantly<br />
<strong>of</strong> penis edema and grade 2 radiation mucositis which dissolved during<br />
8 weeks after the treatment. We didn’t observe any postradiation<br />
necrosis nor urethral stenosis. The worst late side effects recorded<br />
were mild telenagiectasias in the treatment region. The local control<br />
with brachytherapy was achieved in <strong>12</strong> patients, one patient recurred<br />
9 months after brachytherapy and was salvaged by partial<br />
amputation.<br />
: HDR interstitial brachytherapy with 18 times 3 Gy per<br />
fraction twice daily is a promising method in selected patients <strong>of</strong><br />
penile carcinoma and deserves further evaluation in a larger<br />
prospective study.<br />
PO365<br />
PHASE II STUDY: CTGUIDED INTERSTITIAL 60COHDRBRACHYTHERAPY<br />
WITH MRI FUSION FOR BOOST HEAD AND NECK PATIENTS<br />
A. Lozhkov 1 , T.M. Sharabura 1 , A.S. Aladin 2 , A.G. Zhumabaeva 3 , A.V.<br />
Turbina 1 , E.Y. Mozerova 1 , O.N. Davidova 1<br />
1<br />
Chelyabinsk Regional Oncol.Centre, Department for Radiotherapy<br />
and RadioOncology, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation<br />
2<br />
Chelyabinsk Regional Oncol.Centre, Department <strong>of</strong> Head and Neck<br />
Surgery, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation<br />
3<br />
Chelyabinsk Regional Oncol.Centre, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physic,<br />
Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation<br />
: To evaluate the efficacy and safety <strong>of</strong> CTguided<br />
interstitial 60CoHDR<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> with MRI fusion for boost head<br />
and neck patient.<br />
: In the period from February to August 20<strong>10</strong><br />
ten patients with squamous cell carcinoma <strong>of</strong> head and neck( I1, II4,<br />
III3, IV2) received external beam irradiation to the primary and the<br />
neck to a total dose <strong>of</strong> 50 Gy. After 3 4 weeks was carried out<br />
brachytherapy for boost. The brachytherapy dose <strong>of</strong> 24 Gy delivered<br />
in eight equal fractions BID to the primary site+1 cm. Definition <strong>of</strong><br />
GTV was carried out by fusion MRI with contrast done prior to the<br />
start <strong>of</strong> treatment and the CT with interstitial plastic needles.<br />
Insertion <strong>of</strong> plastic needles, using rules <strong>of</strong> the Paris system, but for<br />
planning, using inverse methods.<br />
: Locoregional tumor control at one years was 80%. For the<br />
entire group with one year diseasefree survival <strong>of</strong> 60%. 2 patients<br />
have recurrence after 6 and 9 months after treatment. Acute<br />
mucositis grade 3 had no place. Two patients underwent preventive<br />
tracheostomy<br />
: The use CTguided interstitial HDR<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> with<br />
MRI fusion improving the accuracy and safety <strong>of</strong> radiation treatment<br />
PO366<br />
HIGHDOSERATE INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY AS A MONOTHERAPY<br />
FOR ANTERIOR MOBILE TONGUE CANCER<br />
K. Yoshida 1 , T. Takenaka 2 , H. Akiyama 3 , H. Yamazaki 4 , M. Yoshida 5 , M.<br />
Kano 6 , H. Yamamoto 6 , T. Arika 6 , Y. Koretsune 7 , E. Tanaka 5<br />
1<br />
Osaka national Hospital, Radiation Oncology and Institute for Clinical<br />
Research, Osaka, Japan<br />
2<br />
Osaka National Hospital, Radiology, Osaka, Japan<br />
3<br />
Osaka Dental University, Oral Radiology, Osaka, Japan<br />
4<br />
Kyoto Prefectural University <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Radiology, Kyoto, Japan<br />
5<br />
Osaka National Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Osaka, Japan<br />
6<br />
Osaka National Hospital, Oral Surgery, Osaka, Japan<br />
7<br />
Osaka National Hospital, Institute for Clinical Research, Osaka,<br />
Japan<br />
: We had been used treatment doses <strong>of</strong> 60 Gy in <strong>10</strong><br />
fractions for highdoserate interstitial <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> (HDRISBT) as a<br />
monotherapy for anterior mobile tongue cancer previously. However,<br />
to reduce the treatment duration, we started to use the treatment<br />
doses <strong>of</strong> 54 Gy in 9 fractions in 2001. In this study, we investigated<br />
the feasibility <strong>of</strong> this dosefractionation schedule.<br />
: During eight years (200<strong>12</strong>009), eighteen<br />
N0M0 anterior mobile tongue cancer patients were enrolled at<br />
National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital. The median<br />
age <strong>of</strong> the patients was 61 years (range; 3484 years) and median<br />
followup time was 61 months (range; 21116 months). Using the UICC<br />
classification 2002, 3 patients were classified as T1, 11 patients as T2<br />
and 4 patients as T3. We implanted treatment applicators with the<br />
assistance lugol’s iodine staining and metal marker implantation for<br />
superficial lesion and intraoral ultrasonography for deep lesion.<br />
Treatment plans were optimized using metal marker and computed<br />
tomography as needed, and total treatment doses were 54 Gy in 9<br />
fraction.<br />
: The 2 and 5year local control rates were both 82%,<br />
respectively. The 2year local control rates were <strong>10</strong>0%, 72% and <strong>10</strong>0%<br />
for T1, T2 and T3. Technical error was suspected as a cause <strong>of</strong> local<br />
recurrence for two <strong>of</strong> three patients. One was inadequate shielding by<br />
leadblock and the other was tongue edema during implantation. The<br />
2 and 5year causespecific survival rates were 83% and 74%. The 2<br />
year causespecific survival rates were 67%, 90% and 75% for T1, T2<br />
and T3. Acute severe complication was aspiration <strong>of</strong> sputum that was
S148 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
necessary to be managed by respirator transiently for one patient.<br />
Five patients (28%) showed s<strong>of</strong>t tissue necrosis or mandible<br />
complication as moderate to severe late severe complication. One <strong>of</strong><br />
5 patients received partial sequestrectomy and the other symptoms<br />
were improved by drug and/or hyperbaric oxygen.<br />
: Our treatment result <strong>of</strong> HDRISBT as a monotherapy <strong>of</strong><br />
54 Gy in 9 fractions for anterior mobile tongue cancer is feasible.<br />
Technical improvement should be investigated to prevent local<br />
recurrence by technical error.<br />
PO367<br />
THE DIFFERENT BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF SINGLE, FRACTIONED AND<br />
CLDR IRRADIATION IN CL187 COLORECTAL CANCER CELLS<br />
H. Wang 1 , J. Wang 1<br />
1 Peking University Third Hospital, Cancer Center, Beijing, China<br />
: To identify the different effectiveness <strong>of</strong> single,<br />
fractioned and continuous low dose rate irradiation on the human<br />
colorectal cancer cell line CL187 in vitro and explore the relevant<br />
molecular mechanisms.<br />
: The CL187 cells were exposed to radiation <strong>of</strong><br />
6 MV Xray at high dose rate <strong>of</strong> 4Gy/min and <strong>12</strong>5 I seed at low dose rate<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2.77 cGy/h. There were three groups: single dose radiation group<br />
(SDR), fractioned dose radiation group (FDR) by 2Gy/f and continuous<br />
low dose rate radiation group (CLDR). The radiation doses were 0, 2, 4<br />
and 8Gy, respectively. Radiation responses to radiation <strong>of</strong> tumor cells<br />
were evaluated by colonyforming assay. Cell cycle arrests were<br />
detected by flow cytometry after propidium iodide (PI) staining.<br />
Apoptosis was detected by Annexin and PI staining. The expressions <strong>of</strong><br />
DNAPKcs, Ku70 and Ku80 were determined by Western blotting.<br />
: The relative biological effect (RBE) for <strong>12</strong>5 I seeds compared<br />
with 6 MV Xray was 1.41. At 48h after 0, 2, 4 and 8 Gy irradiation,<br />
the percentage <strong>of</strong> G2/M phase <strong>of</strong> CLDR group were 4.92±0.02%,<br />
13.67±1.67%, 16.41±2.19% and 23.81±1.61%, respectively. Irradiated<br />
by 4Gy, the percentage <strong>of</strong> the G2/M phase cell cycle arrest <strong>of</strong> CLDR<br />
group increased significantly(CLDR vs. SDR, t=6.03, p=0.026; CLDR vs.<br />
FDR, t=13.98, p=0.005). After 0, 2, 4 and 8 Gy irradiation, early<br />
apoptosis rates <strong>of</strong> CLDR group at 48h were 1.28±0.25%, 1.87±0.06%,<br />
6.54±0.88% and 7.62±0.39%, respectively. The percentage <strong>of</strong> early<br />
apoptosis <strong>of</strong> 4Gy in CLDR group increased significantly(CLDR vs. SDR,<br />
t=31.22, p=0.001; CLDR vs. FDR, t=7.01, p=0.02). At 48h after 0, 2, 4<br />
and 8 Gy irradiation, late apoptosis rates <strong>of</strong> CLDR group were<br />
1.19±0.05%, 7.86±0.08%, 9.72±0.85% and 5.76±0.63%, respectively.<br />
The percentage <strong>of</strong> late apoptosis <strong>of</strong> 4Gy in CLDR group increased<br />
significantly(CLDR vs. SDR, t=15.08, p=0.004; CLDR vs. FDR, t=11.99,<br />
p=0.007). DNAPKcs and Ku70 expression level <strong>of</strong> CLDR group<br />
decreased compared with SDR and FDR groups.<br />
: <strong>12</strong>5 I seeds continuous low dose rate irradiation showed<br />
more effective inhibition than that <strong>of</strong> 6 MV Xray high dose rate<br />
irradiation on CL187 cells. Apoptosis and G2/M phase cell cycle arrest<br />
were the main mechanism <strong>of</strong> cellkilling effects under low dose rate<br />
irradiation. <strong>12</strong>5 I seeds continuous low dose rate irradiation could<br />
influence the DNA repair <strong>of</strong> cells via DNAPKcs and Ku70 pathways.<br />
PO368<br />
ULTRASOUNDGUIDED PERCUTANEOUS IODINE<strong>12</strong>5 SEED IMPLANTATION<br />
FOR TREATING LIVER MALIGNANCIES<br />
S.Q. Ttian 1 , J.J. Wang 1 , Y.L. Jiang 1 , W.J. Jiang 1 , P. Jiang 1 , W.Q. Ran 1 ,<br />
N. Meng 1<br />
1<br />
Peking University Third Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology<br />
Cancer Center, Beijing, China<br />
: To investigate the therapeutic efficacy <strong>of</strong><br />
ultrasoundguided <strong>12</strong>5 I seed implantation for treatment <strong>of</strong> liver cancer.<br />
: A total <strong>of</strong> 18 patients (84 male, 13 female;<br />
mean age 53.4 years, range 24–74 years) with liver cancer were<br />
included in this study. The diagnosis <strong>of</strong> each case was verified by CT,<br />
MRI and biopsy. A median number <strong>of</strong> 28 <strong>12</strong>5 I seeds (rang, 856) per<br />
patient were implanted into liver cancer by ultrasoundguided needle<br />
puncture. The specific activity <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>5 I ranged from 0.60 to 0.80 mCi per<br />
seed and the median D90 was <strong>12</strong>0 Gy (rang, 90140 Gy). Patients were<br />
followedup by examination and by contrastenhanced computed<br />
tomography (CT) to evaluate treatment responses. Survival was<br />
analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method.<br />
: During a median followup period was 24 months (range: 4–<br />
37months), the response rate <strong>of</strong> tumor was 83.0%. Overall median<br />
control time was 11.0 months (95% CI, 8.4–14.3). The local control<br />
rate was 59.9% at 1 year and 20.5% at 2 years. The overall median<br />
survival was 15 months (95% CI, 9.6–20.3), while the overall 1, 2 year<br />
survival rates were 61.9%, 27.1%, respectively. No serious<br />
complications were observed postoperatively and during the followup<br />
period<br />
<strong>12</strong>5<br />
: Ultrasoundguided brachytherapy using I seed<br />
implantation was a safe and effective therapeutic technique for<br />
treating liver cancer.<br />
PO369<br />
COMPARISON OF 60 GY AND 54 GY IN HIGHDOSERATE INTERSTITIAL<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY FOR EARLY ORAL TONGUE CANCER<br />
H. Akiyama 1 , K. Yoshida 2 , K. Shimizutani 1 , H. Yamazaki 3 , M. Koizumi 4 ,<br />
Y. Yoshioka 4 , N. Kakimoto 5 , S. Murakami 5 , S. Furukawa 5 , K. Ogawa 4<br />
1<br />
Osaka Dental University, Department <strong>of</strong> Oral Radiology, Osaka,<br />
Japan<br />
2<br />
National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Department<br />
<strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology, Osaka, Japan<br />
3<br />
Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Medical Science Kyoto Prefectural University <strong>of</strong><br />
Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiology, Kyoto, Japan<br />
4<br />
Osaka University Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Radiation Oncology, Osaka, Japan<br />
5<br />
Osaka University Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Densitry, Department <strong>of</strong><br />
MaxilloFacial Radiology, Osaka, Japan<br />
: To compare the results between total dose 60<br />
Gy/ <strong>10</strong> fractions (bid) and 54 Gy/ 9 fractions <strong>of</strong> Highdoserate<br />
interstitial brachytherapy (HDRISBT) for early oral tongue cancer.<br />
: We made a matchedpair analysis <strong>of</strong> early<br />
oral tongue cancer (T<strong>12</strong>N0M0) patient treated by 60 Gy and 54Gy<br />
between 1996 and 2004 at Osaka University Hospital. 17 patients<br />
treated by 54Gy and 34 matched pair control arm treated by 60Gy<br />
were extracted and analyzed.<br />
: Local recurrence occurred in two patients treated with 54 Gy<br />
arm and five in 60 Gy arm. Two and 5year local control rates were<br />
both 88% for 54 Gy arm and 88% and 84% for 60Gy arm (n.s.). Nodal<br />
metastases occurred in 13 and 9 patients for 60 Gy and 54 Gy arms<br />
Fiveyear overall survival rates <strong>of</strong> 60 Gy and 54 Gy arm were 84% and<br />
66%, respectively. One and 2year actuarial complication free rates in<br />
the 60 Gy arm were 97 and 91%, respectively, and those in the 54 Gy<br />
arm was both 83% (n.s.). There were no significant associations<br />
between the total dose and local control rate and late complications.<br />
: A dose <strong>of</strong> 54 Gy in 9 fractions showed compatible<br />
outcome to 60 Gy/ <strong>10</strong> fractions for early oral tongue cancer.<br />
PO370<br />
PERCUTANEOUS ULTRASOUNDGUIDED IODINE<strong>12</strong>5 IMPLANTATION AS A<br />
SALVAGE THERAPY FOR RECURRENT LYMPH NODE METASTASES<br />
J.J. Wang 1 , L.E.I. Lin 1 , Y. Jiang 1 , N.A. Meng 1 , W. Ran 1 , S. Tian 1 , R.<br />
Yang 1 , Y.A.N. Yu 2<br />
1<br />
Peking University Third Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Beijing, China<br />
2<br />
Thomas Jefferson University, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Beijing, USA<br />
: Esophageal cancer is generally associated with a<br />
poor prognosis, particularly in the recurrent cervical lymph node<br />
metastases after radial therapy. This study aimed to assess the<br />
efficacy and feasibility <strong>of</strong> percutaneous <strong>12</strong>5 I seed implantation for the<br />
management <strong>of</strong> recurrent lymph node metastases in esophageal<br />
carcinoma.<br />
: 27 lesions in 16 patients with cervical lymph<br />
node metastases who had undergone ultrasoundguided <strong>12</strong>5 I seed<br />
implantation were reviewed. The local control and survival rates were<br />
evaluated by the KaplanMeier method<br />
: Prior to seed implantation, all patients had undergone<br />
surgery, EBRT with/without chemotherapy: one patient had previously<br />
undergone cervical lymph nodes dissection and EBRT twice; two<br />
patients had undergone surgery once; 13 patients had received EBRT<br />
(9 patients received EBRT once, 4 received EBRT twice). The total<br />
cumulative doses <strong>of</strong> EBRT were 47143 Gy, with a median <strong>of</strong> 64 Gy.<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 149<br />
Four patients had received 13 cycles <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy, with a median<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1 cycle. The activity <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>5 I seeds implanted ranged from 0.5 mCi to<br />
0.8 mCi (median: 0.69 mCi). The total number <strong>of</strong> seeds implanted<br />
ranged from 9 to 84 (median: 27). The actuarial D90 ranged from 142<br />
Gy to 218 Gy (median: 218 Gy). The median time <strong>of</strong> local diseasefree<br />
progression was 7 months (95% CI, 3.3 – <strong>10</strong>.7), and the 1 and 2year<br />
local control rates were 20.1% and 13.4%, respectively. The 1 and 2<br />
year survival rates were 20.6% and 13.8%, respectively (median: 7<br />
months; 95% CI, 3.3 – <strong>10</strong>.7). In the patients with two or more lymph<br />
nodes metastases, seven <strong>of</strong> the nine (78%) patients survived no more<br />
than <strong>10</strong> months. Four <strong>of</strong> seven (57%) patients who had single lymph<br />
node metastases lived longer than <strong>10</strong> months. Of the 16 original<br />
patients, one was still alive at the time <strong>of</strong> data analysis. The other<br />
patients had died from cancerrelated cachexia (n = 8, 50%),<br />
pneumonia (n = 3), the primary tumor (n = 3), and heart disease (n =<br />
1). One patient experienced a grade I skin reaction. Treatment<br />
related blood vessel damage and neuropathy were not observed.<br />
: In esophageal carcinoma patients with recurrent cervical<br />
lymph node metastases after radical therapy, treatment with<br />
permanent percutaneous <strong>12</strong>5 I seed implant is an alternative salvage<br />
treatment, which appears to be effective and welltolerated.<br />
PO371<br />
IMAGEGUIDED IODINE<strong>12</strong>5 PERMANENT IMPLANTATION AS SALVAGE<br />
THERAPY FOR RECURRENT HEAD AND NECK CARCINOMA<br />
J. Wang 1 , L. Zhu 1 , Y. Jiang 1 , N.A. Meng 1 , W. Ran 1 , H. Yuan 1 , C.H.E.N.<br />
Liu 1 , A.N.G. Qu 1 , R. Yang 1<br />
1<br />
Peking University Third Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Beijing, China<br />
: To preliminarily assess the feasibility, efficacy,<br />
and morbidity <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>5 I seed implantation under imageguidance for<br />
recurrent head and neck carcinoma after both surgery and external<br />
beam radiotherapy.<br />
: Nineteen patients with recurrent head and<br />
neck carcinomas underwent <strong>12</strong>5 I seed implantation under ultrasound or<br />
ComputedTomography (CT) guidance. The actuarial D90 <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>5 I seed<br />
implantation ranged from 90 to 160 Gy (median, 131 Gy). The follow<br />
up ranged from 3 to 44 months (median, 11 months).<br />
: The median local control was 24 months (95%CI, <strong>10</strong>.2–37.8).<br />
The 1 year 2 year and 3 year local controls were 73.3%, 27.5% and<br />
27.5%, respectively, whereas the 1 year, 2 year and 3 year<br />
survival rates were 53.0%, 18.2% and 18.2%, respectively, and the<br />
median survival was 13 months (95% CI, 6.6–19.4). 26.3% <strong>of</strong> patients<br />
(5/19) died <strong>of</strong> local recurrence and 21.1% <strong>of</strong> patients (4/19) died <strong>of</strong><br />
metastases. No bone, s<strong>of</strong>t tissue necrosis and carotid artery damages<br />
were noted.<br />
: <strong>12</strong>5 I seed implantation is feasible and safe as a salvage<br />
treatment for patients with recurrent head and neck cancers. The<br />
high local control results and low morbidity merits further<br />
investigation.<br />
PO372<br />
EVALUATION OF BIODEGRADABLE MAGNESIUM ALLOY AZ31 AS A NEW<br />
CONNECTING MATERIAL FOR IODINE<strong>12</strong>5 BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
Z. Fu Jun 1<br />
1<br />
Sun Yatsen University Cancer Center, Department <strong>of</strong> Imaging and<br />
Interventional Radiology, Guangzhou, China<br />
: To evaluate the in vivo degradation<br />
characteristics and tissue compatibility <strong>of</strong> new I <strong>12</strong>5 seed chains<br />
connected with the biodegradable magnesium alloy AZ31 in New<br />
Zealand rabbits.<br />
: Thirty New Zealand rabbits were randomly<br />
divided into three groups. In group A, magnesium alloy radioactive I <strong>12</strong>5<br />
seed chains were implanted into VX2 tumors; in group B, magnesium<br />
alloy nonradioactive I <strong>12</strong>5 seed chains were implanted into normal<br />
muscle; group C served as an untreated control group. The mass loss<br />
<strong>of</strong> the AZ31 magnesium alloy connecting material was measured in the<br />
two groups at different time points after implantation <strong>of</strong> the I <strong>12</strong>5 seed<br />
chains. Morphological and histological changes at the implantation<br />
site and in <strong>org</strong>ans were monitored using light microscopy, and seed<br />
displacement was assessed using regular Xray and computed<br />
tomography (CT) scanning. Blood and urine samples were collected<br />
from all experimental animals to measure changes in magnesium ion<br />
concentrations.<br />
: The new I <strong>12</strong>5 seed chains made with AZ31 magnesium alloy<br />
began to degrade during the first week after implantation. On day 21,<br />
the degradation rate was 81% in muscle tissue and 83% in tumor<br />
tissue; these degradation rates are not statistically significant. Shortly<br />
after implantation, a mild local inflammatory response and gas<br />
production were induced; the gas disappeared 21 days after<br />
implantation. Blood magnesium ion concentrations after implantation<br />
were relatively stable, but urine magnesium concentrations increased<br />
and fluctuated over a larger range. Pathological inspection <strong>of</strong> the<br />
liver, kidney, heart, and spleen <strong>of</strong> all animals implanted with I <strong>12</strong>5 seed<br />
chains revealed no significant abnormalities. At 7 days after the<br />
implantation <strong>of</strong> magnesium alloy radioactive I <strong>12</strong>5 seed chains into<br />
tumors, the connecting material showed good connecting and fixing<br />
function. At 21 days after implantation, the seeds had separated from<br />
each other, displacement had occurred, and the radioactive seeds had<br />
aggregated in concordance with tumor shrinkage.<br />
: Iodine<strong>12</strong>5 seed implants connected with AZ31<br />
magnesium alloy have rapid degradation characteristics and good<br />
biocompatibility when implanted into rabbits,the results suggest that<br />
magnesium alloy AZ31 might be a potential and attractive connecting<br />
material for permanently iodine<strong>12</strong>5 brachytherapy.<br />
PO373<br />
HDR BRACHYTHERAPY BOOST FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED RECTAL<br />
CARCINOMA FOLLOWING EBCRTCLATTERBRIDGE EXPERIENCE<br />
A. Sun Myint 1 , A. Montazeri 1 , F. Jelly 1 , M. Snee 1 , H. Wong 1<br />
1<br />
Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology, Clinical Oncology, Bebington<br />
Merseyside, United Kingdom<br />
: Preop chemoradiotherapy is now standard <strong>of</strong><br />
care for the locally advanced rectal carcinomas with threatened CRM.<br />
Clear resection margin is not always possible and advanced surgical<br />
techniques have to be used with increase morbidity and mortality. We<br />
present our experience on patients treated at brachytherapy unit in<br />
Clatterbridge.<br />
: From Jan 2003Dec 20<strong>10</strong>, patients with<br />
locally advanced low rectal cancer were treated with preoperative<br />
chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using 45Gy /25#/5 weeks with oral<br />
capecitabine (MonFri) during RT. A total <strong>of</strong> 53 patients <strong>of</strong> whom 42<br />
(79.2%) were males. Median age was 65 years (range3983). Preop<br />
MRI staging was mandatory. Stages were T3 = 43 (81.1%), T4= 6<br />
(11.3%) others 4 (7.5%) . HDR rectal brachytherapy was carried out<br />
within 24 weeks after completion <strong>of</strong> CRT using OncoSmart multi<br />
channel applicator delivering <strong>10</strong>Gy at <strong>10</strong>mm from the surface <strong>of</strong> the<br />
applicator. Restaging MRI scan was carried out at 4 weeks (8wks from<br />
CRT). Surgery was carried out 46 weeks later.<br />
: Only patients proceeded to surgery were analysed. Median<br />
follow up was 18 months (range 0.0370). Type <strong>of</strong> surgery were APR<br />
35(66%), and AR 17(32.1%). Only one patient had palliative resection.<br />
Complete resection (R0) was achieved in 45(84.9%), R1 in 8 pts<br />
(15.1%). Significant down staging occurred in 19 pts (35.8%) out <strong>of</strong><br />
which <strong>12</strong> (22.6%) has no residual tumour. Thirty three patients with<br />
either N1 19(35.8%) or N2 14 (26.4%) were down staged to no residual<br />
tumour (N0) in the lymph nodes. There was only one patient initially<br />
staged N0 has evidence <strong>of</strong> disease (N1). No significant increased in<br />
surgical morbidity was encountered (detailed surgical paper to<br />
follow).<br />
: HDR brachytherapy can be <strong>of</strong>fered to locally advance<br />
rectal cancer following preop CRT. This could down staged the<br />
tumour further and improve R0 resection rate which reduces the<br />
chance <strong>of</strong> relapse at a later date. Those patients who achieved down<br />
staging can be identified with MRI restaging scans. After MDT<br />
discussion, major surgery can be avoided in those patients suitable for<br />
watch policy to reduce morbidity and mortality especially in elderly<br />
and those with increased surgical risk.
S150 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
PO374<br />
PROSPECTIVE DOSEESCALADE STUDY OF ADJUVANT HIGHDOSERATE<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY FOR SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS<br />
G. Kacso 1 , L. Florea 2 , D. Eniu 3<br />
1<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. I. Chiricuta, <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Cluj<br />
Napoca, Romania<br />
2<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. I. Chiricuta, Medical Oncology, Cluj<br />
Napoca, Romania<br />
3<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. I. Chiricuta, Surgery, Cluj Napoca,<br />
Romania<br />
: Prospective nonrandomized doseescalade study<br />
<strong>of</strong> adjuvant highdoserate brachytherapy (HDR BT) for completely<br />
resected high grade s<strong>of</strong>t tissues sarcomas <strong>of</strong> extremities or superficial<br />
trunk (STRESs)<br />
: From November 2004 to February 2008, 15<br />
patients with nonmetastatic pT<strong>12</strong>R0 G23 STRESs consented to<br />
participate and were given adjuvant Iridium 192 HDRBT on 3 dose<br />
levels: <strong>12</strong> fractions <strong>of</strong> 3 Gy, bid (regimen A), 14 fractions <strong>of</strong> 3 Gy, bid<br />
(B) and <strong>12</strong> fractions <strong>of</strong> 3.5Gy, bid (C). Prior stratification according to<br />
the topography (upper vs. lower limb vs. trunk) and to the size (< 5cm<br />
vs. 5<strong>10</strong> cm vs. ><strong>10</strong> cm) ensured equal distribution between dose<br />
subgroups. Single plan equidistant catheters (stainless needles or<br />
plastic tubes depending on the anatomy) were implanted per<br />
operatively, with BT starting no sooner than the fifth day after the Ro<br />
resection. The dose was prescribed at 1 cm from the cathethers axis.<br />
Nine patients (60%) received also adjuvant chemotherapy. BT toxicity<br />
was assessed on the CTC3.0 scale, whereas efficacy by local control or<br />
histological proven local recurrence.<br />
: The local treatment (surgery + BT) was delivered between 11<br />
and 20 days (mean 14.5 days). With a median followup <strong>of</strong> 46 months<br />
(13 to 84 months), the local failure was 40% (2 patients) vs. 20 % (1<br />
patient) vs. none in C vs. B vs. A subgroup. One single acute wound<br />
dehiscence and one other severe late toxicity (subcutaneous fibrosis)<br />
was noticed in the 14frx 3Gy group and in the 3.5Gy/fr dose level,<br />
respectively. The ≤ G2 late toxicity (skin, neurologic and/or functional<br />
impairment) was recorded more frequently in the high dose arms (B &<br />
C).<br />
: For this STRESs group <strong>of</strong> patients, there seems no<br />
benefit <strong>of</strong> dose escalade with adjuvant HDR BT from 3 Gy to 3.5 Gy/fr<br />
or from <strong>12</strong> fr to 14 fr bid. In our study, the <strong>12</strong>fr x 3 Gy bid regimen<br />
<strong>of</strong>fers the best therapeutic index, with <strong>10</strong>0% local control and no<br />
severe toxicity at almost 4 years median followup. The short overall<br />
treatment time favours BT as compared to external beam<br />
radiotherapy.<br />
PO375<br />
THE CLINICAL VALUE AND SAFETY OF TRANSSUPERIOR VENA CAVA<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY FOR METASTATIC MEDIASTINAL LYMPH NODES<br />
Y. Li 1 , B. Liu 1 , Y. Wang 1 , W. Wang 1 , Z. Li 1 , X. Song 1<br />
1<br />
Second Hospital <strong>of</strong> Shandong University, Interventional therapy,<br />
Jinan, China<br />
: To investigate the clinical value and safety <strong>of</strong><br />
trans superior vena cava brachytherapy in treating metastatic lymph<br />
nodes <strong>of</strong> mediastinum under CTguidance.<br />
: From November 2009 to January 2011, 15<br />
patients with 27 metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes received <strong>12</strong>5 I<br />
brachytherapy.The diameter <strong>of</strong> these lymph nodes ranged from 1.0 to<br />
4.0cm. The diameter <strong>of</strong> these metastatic lymph nodes ranged from<br />
1.0 to 4.0cm; 15(55.56%) <strong>of</strong> them with diameter <strong>of</strong>T>0.01 day.<br />
BEDVHs were generated for all ROIs using these T values and<br />
correspondingly reduced prescription doses. Objective functions were<br />
created to evaluate the BEDVHs as a function <strong>of</strong> both implant duration<br />
vs. T=7 and radionuclide selection vs. R= <strong>12</strong>5 I.<br />
: Reducing T from 7 to 0.01 day for a <strong>10</strong> mm plaque produced<br />
a BED benefit <strong>of</strong> 26%, 20%, and 17% for <strong>10</strong>3 Pd, <strong>12</strong>5 I, and 131 Cs,<br />
respectively, across all treatment positions considered. Results were<br />
somewhat positiondependent for the larger plaques. For all positions,<br />
T, and plaque sizes, we calculated a 16%35% BED benefit for <strong>10</strong>3 Pd vs.<br />
<strong>12</strong>5 131 <strong>12</strong>5<br />
I and a 3%7% BED detriment for Cs vs. I. Additionally, the<br />
corresponding OAR physical doses were lowest for <strong>10</strong>3 Pd under all<br />
circumstances.<br />
: Shorter implant durations may correlate with more<br />
favorable outcomes compared to 7 day implants when treating small<br />
or medium intraocular lesions. Results also indicate that implant<br />
duration may be safely reduced if the prescription physical dose is<br />
<strong>10</strong>3<br />
appropriately diminished, and that Pd <strong>of</strong>fers a substantial<br />
radiobiological benefit over <strong>12</strong>5 I and 131 Cs irrespective <strong>of</strong> plaque<br />
position, implant duration, and tumor size.<br />
PO379<br />
ENDOLUMINAL HIGH DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY FOR EARLY STAGE<br />
AND RECURRENT ESOPHAGEAL CANCER<br />
M.R. Folkert 1 , G.N. Cohen 2 , A.J. Wu 1 , H. Gerdes 3 , M.A. Schattner 3 , E.<br />
Ludwig 3 , D.H. Ilson 4 , K.A. Goodman 1<br />
1<br />
Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, New<br />
York NY, USA<br />
2<br />
Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Medical Physics, New York<br />
NY, USA<br />
3<br />
Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Gastroenterology, New<br />
York NY, USA<br />
4<br />
Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Medical Oncology, New<br />
York NY, USA<br />
: The management <strong>of</strong> locally recurrent esophageal<br />
cancer (EC) after definitive chemoradiotherapy or early stage EC in<br />
patients who are poor surgical candidates is complex. Endoluminal<br />
highdoserate (HDR) brachytherapy utilizing a wide range <strong>of</strong><br />
techniques and dosing regimens has been used with mixed results in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> toxicity and local control. In this study we examine the<br />
outcomes and toxicities in early stage and locally recurrent EC<br />
patients treated with a consistent HDR technique.<br />
: Between 8/2008 and 7/2011, 14 patients with<br />
EC were treated with HDR intraluminal brachytherapy, <strong>10</strong> (71.4%) with<br />
recurrent disease after chemoradiotherapy and 4 (28.6%) with<br />
previously unirradiated lesions. <strong>12</strong> (85.7%) patients had<br />
adenocarcinoma and 2 (14.3%) had squamous cell carcinoma. Of the<br />
previously treated patients, median dose <strong>of</strong> prior radiotherapy was<br />
5040 cGy (range 45005600 cGy). HDR treatments were performed<br />
under general anesthesia in conjunction with a gastroenterologist. At<br />
the time <strong>of</strong> the procedure, tumor extent was defined endoscopically<br />
and radioopaque markers were placed on the skin surface to<br />
demarcate the proximal and distal tumor and facilitate catheter<br />
positioning. Treatments were delivered in 3 fractions over 3 weeks to<br />
a median dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>00 cGy (range <strong>10</strong>001500 cGy); dose was<br />
prescribed to a median depth <strong>of</strong> 7mm (range 4<strong>10</strong>mm) with mucosal<br />
surface dose limited to 800<strong>10</strong>00 cGy. 6 (42.9%) patients also received<br />
concurrent chemotherapy (capecitabine, <strong>10</strong>00 mg BID) during the 3<br />
week course <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy. Patients were followed with serial<br />
imaging and esophagoscopy every 23 months.<br />
: Overall median followup was 9.7 months; 1 year local<br />
progressionfree (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 48.8% (95% CI:<br />
22.375.9%) and 88.9% (95% CI: 58.298.8%) respectively. For patients<br />
with recurrent disease, median followup was 6.7 months; 1 year PFS<br />
and OS were 32.4% (95% CI: 8.668.3%) and 80% (95% CI: 42.296.9%)<br />
respectively. For patients with previously unirradiated disease,<br />
median followup was 21.9 months; 1 year PFS and OS were 75.0% (95%<br />
CI: 21.998.7%) and <strong>10</strong>0.0% (95% CI: 39.6<strong>10</strong>0.0%) respectively. 1<br />
patient (7.1%) with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma developed<br />
distant metastases 8.5 months after treatment. 8 <strong>of</strong> 14 (57.1%)<br />
patients had Grade 1 acute adverse effects; 6 <strong>of</strong> 14 (42.9%) patients<br />
had chronic Grade 1 adverse effects; 2 <strong>of</strong> 14 (14.3%) patients<br />
developed Grade 1 strictures noted on endoscopy (both with recurrent<br />
disease). There were no Grade 2 or higher complications.<br />
: HDR brachytherapy with or without concurrent<br />
chemotherapy is a safe and welltolerated treatment for both early<br />
stage, previously untreated and recurrent EC. Given the high rate <strong>of</strong><br />
local recurrence and minimal toxicity in these patients, we are<br />
planning a prospective dose escalation trial for recurrent EC to<br />
determine the optimal brachytherapy regimen.<br />
PO380<br />
THE “CLAWS” : A GOLD APPLICATOR LOADED WITH I<strong>12</strong>5 SEEDS FOR<br />
LOCALIZED WHOLE EYE RADIOTHERAPY<br />
C.J. Trauernicht 1 , G.J. Maree 1 , E.R. Hering 1 , F.C.P. Du Plessis 2 , C.<br />
Stannard 3 , K. Lecuona 4 , R. Munro 1 , S. Tovey 1<br />
1<br />
Groote Schuur Hospital, Medical Physics, Cape Town, South Africa<br />
2<br />
University <strong>of</strong> the Free State, Medical Physics, Bloemfontein, South<br />
Africa<br />
3<br />
Groote Schuur Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Cape Town, South<br />
Africa<br />
4<br />
Groote Schuur Hospital, Ophthalmology, Cape Town, South Africa<br />
: This applicator (Fig. 1) is a specially designed<br />
gold applicator which is loaded with I<strong>12</strong>5 seeds. The applicator is<br />
used to mainly treat children with retinoblastoma, who require whole<br />
eye radiotherapy.<br />
: Under general anaesthesia, a pericorneal ring<br />
is attached to the 4 extraocular muscles, and 4 appendages, each<br />
loaded with I<strong>12</strong>5 seeds, are inserted beneath the conjunctiva in<br />
between each pair <strong>of</strong> muscles and attached anteriorly to the ring. The<br />
applicator has an inside diameter <strong>of</strong> 22 mm.
S152 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
Fig 1: The 'Claws'<br />
: The applicator irradiates the eye with minimal dose to the<br />
surrounding bony orbit, extraocular optic nerve, eyelids and lacrimal<br />
gland. Certain seeds may be omitted to reduce the dose to the<br />
unaffected parts <strong>of</strong> the eye. A typical treatment prescription is 40 Gy<br />
given over 4 days to the centre <strong>of</strong> the eye. General anaesthesia is also<br />
required for the removal <strong>of</strong> the applicator.<br />
55 eyes in 49 patients were treated from 1987 – 2006. According to<br />
the Intraocular Group Classification <strong>of</strong> Stage 0 cancers, there were 9<br />
group B, 4 group C, 38 group D and 4 group E patients. 19 patients<br />
were treated with ≤ 34 Gy, 36 received ≥ 35 Gy. The median followup<br />
was 33 months, the range 2 – 205 months. Tumour control was<br />
achieved in 35 out <strong>of</strong> 55 patients (64 %) (groups B / C: 85 %; group D:<br />
58 %), the eye survived in 26 out <strong>of</strong> 55 patients (47 %) (groups B / C:<br />
85 %, group D: 39 %) and vision was retained in 23 out <strong>of</strong> 55 patients<br />
(42 %) (groups C / D: 85 %; group D: 32 %).<br />
: There is good local control for groups B and C. Local<br />
control in group D is improved with chemotherapy. Cosmesis is<br />
excellent.<br />
The applicators are costeffective because they can be reused, and<br />
the I<strong>12</strong>5 seeds are regularly used for other eye plaques and implants.<br />
A current project is underway to do the dose calculations using Monte<br />
Carlo simulations.<br />
PO381<br />
PREDICTIVE MODEL OF COMPLICATIONS AFTER PERIOPERATIVE HIGH<br />
DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
I. San Miguel 1 , M. RodriguezRuiz 2 , A. Olarte 2 , M. Cambeiro 2 , J.<br />
Aristu 2 , J. GarcíaFoncillas 1 , M. San Julián 3 , J. Alcalde 4 , M. Jurado 5 , R.<br />
MartinezMonge 2<br />
1<br />
Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Medical Oncology, Pamplona, Spain<br />
2<br />
Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Radiation Oncology, Pamplona,<br />
Spain<br />
3<br />
Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Orthopedic Surgery, Pamplona,<br />
Spain<br />
4<br />
Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Otolaryngology, Pamplona, Spain<br />
5<br />
Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Gynaecology, Pamplona, Spain<br />
: To discover which patient, tumor, and treatment<br />
factors determine toxicity after perioperative high doserate<br />
brachytherapy (PHDRB).<br />
: Patients (n=329) enrolled in several PHDRB<br />
prospective Phase III studies conducted at the Clínica Universidad de<br />
Navarra were analyzed. Two hundred and twelve patients received<br />
one course <strong>of</strong> primary PHDRB +/ EBRT, and 117 patients received<br />
PHDRB after one or several EBRT or brachytherapy courses.<br />
: The median followup was 2.3 years (range, 0.1 – <strong>10</strong>.2). The<br />
highest toxic event observed was grade ≥ 3 in <strong>10</strong>5 cases (31.9%), grade<br />
≥ 4 in 54 cases (16.4%), and grade 5 in <strong>12</strong> cases (3.6%). The first grade<br />
≥ 3 and ≥ 4 <strong>events</strong> occurred at a median time <strong>of</strong> 3.8 months and 3.0<br />
months after surgery, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that<br />
Grade ≥ 3 complications increased with TV150 ≥ 13 cc (p=0.004),<br />
lifetime Eq2Gy ≥ 80Gy (p=0.013), and time to loading ≥ 5 days<br />
(p=0.034). Grade ≥ 4 complications also increased with TV150 ≥ 13 cc<br />
(p=0.035), lifetime Eq2Gy ≥ 95Gy (p=0.001), and time to loading ≥ 5<br />
days (p=0.041). The combination <strong>of</strong> the three variables increased the<br />
predictive ability <strong>of</strong> the model for grade ≥3 complications (AUC =<br />
0.619; p=0.0001) and grade ≥4 complications (AUC = 0.663; p=0.0001).<br />
: Grade ≥ 3 and grade ≥ 4 complications observed after<br />
surgery + PHDRB are multifactorial in origin and are mainly dependent<br />
upon treatment factors (TV150, lifetime Eq2Gy and time to loading).<br />
PO382<br />
DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON OF 131CS VERSUS <strong>12</strong>5I INTRAOPERATIVE<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT RESECTED BRAIN TUMORS<br />
A.G. Wernicke 1 , T.H. Schwartz 2 , P. Stieg 2 , J.A. Boockvar 2 , S.<br />
Pannullo 2 , L. Nedialkova 1 , A.M. Sabbas 1 , B. Parashar 1 , D. Nori 1 , K.S.C.<br />
Chao 1<br />
1<br />
Weill Cornell Medical Center <strong>of</strong> Cornell University, Radiation<br />
Oncology, New York, USA<br />
2<br />
Weill Cornell Medical Center <strong>of</strong> Cornell University, Neurosurgery,<br />
New York NY, USA<br />
: A prospective ongoing trial assesses feasibility <strong>of</strong><br />
131<br />
Csbased intraoperative brachytherapy in patients undergoing<br />
maximally safe neurosurgical resection <strong>of</strong> brain tumors. Intra<br />
<strong>12</strong>5<br />
operative I brachytherapy was previously established in<br />
neurosurgically resected brain tumors with up to 26% radiation<br />
necrosis (UCSF) until 131 Cs emerged as a novel radioisotope with more<br />
favorable physical and radiobiological characteristics. In this analysis,<br />
we created 2 plans for each patient so as to compare dosimetric<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>5 I and 131 Cs.<br />
: After obtaining an IRB approval, a total <strong>of</strong> 17<br />
patients were prospectively accrued to an ongoing trial and treated<br />
with 131 Csbased brachytherapy (<strong>10</strong> with newly diagnosed solitary<br />
brain metastases and 7 with recurrent high grade tumors) between<br />
September 20<strong>10</strong> and September 2011. Median age at diagnosis was 55<br />
years (range, 4784 years). A dose <strong>of</strong> 80 Gy was prescribed to the<br />
tumor surface, using median activity <strong>of</strong> 131 Cs 2.87 U (range, 2.11 <br />
3.08 U). The patients were treated with 131 Cs. A separate plan was<br />
created for each patient where a dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>0Gy was prescribed to the<br />
tumor surface, with activity <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>5 I implants 0.70 U (0.55 mCi) based<br />
on experience from UCSF. V<strong>10</strong>0 represents the volume delineated by<br />
the seeds which is the CTV. A dose distribution to the healthy brain<br />
tissue was determined as the median difference <strong>of</strong> volumes (V) at 3<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> isodose lines in all patients: 80<strong>10</strong>0%, 50<strong>10</strong>0%, and 30<strong>10</strong>0%.<br />
A statistical analysis employed ttest to perform comparisons <strong>of</strong> the<br />
dosimetric pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> the two isotopes.<br />
: The median implanted tumor cavity volume was 8.98 cc<br />
(range, 1.75 76.63 cc). The median number <strong>of</strong> seeds placed into the<br />
neurosurgical cavity was <strong>12</strong> (range, 550). For 131 Cs implants compared<br />
to <strong>12</strong>5 I implant, median V80% was 11.93cc vs. 16.89cc (p=0.002);<br />
median V50% was 21.56 cc vs. 29.11 cc (p=0.004); median V30% was<br />
40.69cc vs. 52.11cc (p=0.01). The corresponding delta volumes were<br />
median V80<strong>10</strong>0%: 3.13cc vs. 3.85cc (p=0.009); median V50<strong>10</strong>0%:<br />
<strong>12</strong>.84cc vs. 16.07cc (p=0.03); median V30<strong>10</strong>0%: 32.69cc vs. 39.08cc<br />
(p=0.06).<br />
: 131 Csbased intraoperative brachytherapy can be used to<br />
achieve a more compact dose distribution than the previously<br />
established <strong>12</strong>5 Ibased approach, thus potentially predisposing less<br />
normal tissue to toxicity such as radiation necrosis. A prospective<br />
clinical study is in progress to assess local control, toxicity and<br />
survival outcomes using this treatment modality in patients with<br />
neurosurgically resected brain tumors.<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 153<br />
PO383<br />
CESIUM131 BRACHYTHERAPY FOR HEAD AND NECK CANCERS: FIRST<br />
REPORT OF OUTCOMES, TOXICITY AND RADIATION EXPOSURE<br />
B. Parashar 1 , S. Arora 1 , A. Pavese 2 , D. Kutler 3 , W. Kuhel 3 , S. Trichter 1 ,<br />
A.G. Wernicke 1 , D. Nori 1 , K.S.C. Chao 1<br />
1<br />
New York Hospital/Cornell Med.Cente, Radiation Oncology, New<br />
York, USA<br />
2<br />
New York Hospital/Cornell Med.Cente, Health Physics, New York,<br />
USA<br />
3<br />
New York Hospital/Cornell Med.Cente, Otorhinolaryngology, New<br />
York, USA<br />
: Cesium131 is an encapsulated radioactive<br />
isotope that is approved for head and neck cancer (HNC)<br />
brachytherapy. It has a shorter halflife (9.7 days) but similar energy<br />
to Iodine<strong>12</strong>5 (I<strong>12</strong>5). Recurrent HNC are common and pose a<br />
significant therapeutic challenge. This report evaluates the outcomes,<br />
toxicity and radiation exposure in patients with high risk and<br />
recurrent HN cancers treated with surgery followed by Cs131<br />
brachytherapy.<br />
: Eighteen Cs131 implants were performed in<br />
14 patients from 20092011. There were 6 males and 8 females. Most<br />
common histology was squamous cell carcinoma. Other histologies<br />
were merkel cell carcinoma, carcinosarcoma and osteosarcoma.<br />
Twelve patients had previously received a full course <strong>of</strong> radiation<br />
therapy. Of the patients without prior RT, one received a neck<br />
implant after surgery for tonsil primary since he refused external<br />
radiation. Another patient with Merkel cell skin cancer received a<br />
neck implant after nodal disease progression during adjuvant<br />
radiation. After surgical resection, Cs131 seeds were placed 0.51cm<br />
apart on the tumor bed to deliver 80Gy at 0.5 cm (based on Cs131<br />
nomogram). Lead shields and gowns were used by radiation<br />
oncologists and surgeons. Dosimetric CT scan was performed within a<br />
week <strong>of</strong> the implant. Patients were followed by clinical exam and<br />
imaging. Local control was defined as no clinical/radiological<br />
evidence <strong>of</strong> recurrence in the area <strong>of</strong> implant. In keeping with Nuclear<br />
Regulatory Commission (NRC) guidelines, exposure rate at 1 meter (m)<br />
was measured following the procedure using a Keithley survey counter<br />
(ion chamber).<br />
: Median age was 71y (range 2288y). Primary tumors that<br />
were included were those <strong>of</strong> oral cavity, oropharynx, paranasal sinus<br />
and skin with neck nodes. Seventeen <strong>of</strong> eighteen implants were<br />
performed in recurrent tumor after surgical resection. Median number<br />
<strong>of</strong> seeds were 21 (Range <strong>10</strong>58). Median seed activity was 2.4 Gy<br />
m 2 /h (range 0.952.5). Median followup was <strong>10</strong> months (range 224<br />
months). Local control was 77.7% (14/18 implants). Four patients<br />
(28.5%) developed distant metastasis. Four patients have died at the<br />
time <strong>of</strong> last followup due to distant metastasis. There was no RTOG<br />
grade 3 or 4 toxicity related to the implants. The median RT exposure<br />
rate at 1 meter postimplant was 2.3mrem/hr postimplant<br />
(recommended limits to radiation exposure to pr<strong>of</strong>essionals5000<br />
mrem/y for stochastic effects, 15000 mrem/yr for lens <strong>of</strong> the eye and<br />
and 50,000mrem/yr for all others).<br />
: Cs131 LDR brachytherapy is a safe and effective option<br />
for high risk Head and neck cancers. It produces high control rates,<br />
limited toxicity and is safe for health personnel in terms <strong>of</strong> radiation<br />
exposure.<br />
PO384<br />
COMBINED EXTERNAL BEAM RADIOTHERAPY AND INTRALUMINAL<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL CANCER<br />
D. Scepanovic 1 , M. Pobijakova 1 , P. Lukacko 1 , M. Masar 1 , Z. Dolinska 1 ,<br />
A. Masarykova 1<br />
1 National Oncology Institute, Radiation Oncology, Bratislava, Slovakia<br />
: The main objective <strong>of</strong> treatment for locally<br />
advanced esophageal cancer remains palliation <strong>of</strong> dysphagia.<br />
Radiotherapy for palliation can be external beam alone, intraluminal<br />
brachytherapy (ILBT) alone, or a combination <strong>of</strong> both.<br />
The purpose <strong>of</strong> our study was to compare the effect <strong>of</strong> combined<br />
external and intraluminal radiation treatment versus external beam<br />
radiotherapy alone (EBRT).<br />
: Between 2006 and 20<strong>10</strong>, 66 patients (pts)<br />
with locally advanced esophageal cancer received radiation therapy<br />
(RT) with/without chemotherapy (CT). Patients without evidence <strong>of</strong><br />
metastatic disease were identified. Combined EBRT/ILBT and EBRT<br />
alone were performed in 26 and 40 pts, respectively. ILBT with high<br />
doserate Ir192 source was applied after pts completed EBRT as a<br />
boost therapy. The external radiation was performed with a median<br />
total dose <strong>of</strong> 46Gy given in 23 fractions. On the average a week after<br />
the external radiation a median total dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong>Gy ILBT was given in 2<br />
fractions. The longterm outcomes were investigated with a median<br />
followup time <strong>of</strong> 20 months.<br />
: The overall cumulative survival rate was <strong>10</strong>% at 5 years for<br />
whole group <strong>of</strong> pts. The cause specific survival rate at 5 years was 4%<br />
in the external irradiation alone group and 22% in ILBT combined<br />
group. There was statistically significant difference between two<br />
groups <strong>of</strong> patients regarding overall survival (OS) (p = 0.0002). The<br />
incidence <strong>of</strong> early and late complications did not differ according to<br />
whether ILBT was used.<br />
: The usefulness <strong>of</strong> ILBT, as additional irradiation in large<br />
advanced tumors has been shown similar results for dysphagiafree<br />
survival, stenosis, and fistulas and is equally effective in palliation <strong>of</strong><br />
advanced esophageal cancer. ILBT as a boost treatment seems to<br />
contribute to the prolonged survival <strong>of</strong> these pts (p=0.0279).<br />
PO385<br />
SUBLOBAR RESECTION AND BRACHYTHERAPY FOR NON SMALL CELL<br />
LUNG CANCER IN PATIENTS WITH HISTORY OF PRIOR MALIGNANCY<br />
A. Jain 1 , C. Connery 2 , F. Bhora 2 , W. Choi 1 , A. Evans 1<br />
1<br />
St. Luke'sRoosevelt Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
New York, USA<br />
2<br />
St. Luke'sRoosevelt Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Surgery, New York, USA<br />
: Patients with a history <strong>of</strong> malignancy and a new<br />
diagnosis <strong>of</strong> early stage lung cancer can pose a challenging clinical<br />
problem. Previous oncologic treatments or comorbidities may limit<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> conventional treatment options. Patients in this group who<br />
are not candidates for lobectomy have been <strong>of</strong>fered sublobar<br />
resection plus brachytherapy at our institution and clinical outcomes<br />
are reported here.<br />
: Records <strong>of</strong> patients who underwent sublobar<br />
resection plus brachytherapy for a new diagnosis <strong>of</strong> early stage lung<br />
cancer from 2006 to 2011 at our institution were reviewed to identify<br />
patients with prior malignancies. Patients were determined by pre<br />
treatment evaluation to have T1 or T2 lung cancer with tumors
S154 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
Median age was 76. There were a total <strong>of</strong> 20 prior malignancies in this<br />
group; 6 Lung, 4 Breast, 4 Gastrointestinal, 3 Prostate, 1 Head and<br />
Neck, 1 Lymphoma, and 1 Skin. 4 patients had previous lobectomy, 3<br />
patients had previous thoracic radiation, and 1 patient had both<br />
lobectomy and thoracic radiation for treatment <strong>of</strong> prior malignancy.<br />
Final pathologic staging showed T1N0 disease in 13 patients, T2N0<br />
disease in 3 patients, and T2N2 disease in 1 patient. Median follow up<br />
was 13.3 months (range 3.652.3 months). Local control at last follow<br />
up was <strong>10</strong>0% and regional control was 87.5%. Disease specific survival<br />
for lung cancer was 94% and overall survival was 76%. Postoperative<br />
complications were seen in 4 patients including readmission for<br />
inpatient rehabilitation, pneumothorax, acute pulmonary embolism<br />
(PE) and death due to pneumosepsis. Among the group <strong>of</strong> 8 patients<br />
with previous lobectomy and/or thoracic radiation the procedure was<br />
well tolerated with one acute PE as the only postoperative<br />
complication seen. At last follow up, there was one death in this<br />
group, from progressive lung cancer.<br />
: Sublobar resection plus brachytherapy is a feasible<br />
option in appropriately selected patients with early stage non small<br />
cell lung cancer and a history <strong>of</strong> prior malignancy. Previous lobectomy<br />
or thoracic radiation for prior malignancy should not be considered<br />
exclusion criteria for this procedure.<br />
PO386<br />
ENDOBRONCHIAL BRACHYTHERAPYAS ADJUVANT TREATMENTIN<br />
PRIMARY BRONCHIAL N.S.C.L.C TUMORS<br />
K. Papalla 1 , B. Polizoi 2 , I. Tsalafoutas 3 , D. Bisirtzoglou 4 , A. Zettos 4 , B.<br />
Anastasakos 4 , G. Politis 4 , I. Katsilieris 1<br />
1 St. Savvas Anticancer Institute, 3rd Radiotherapy, Athens, Greece<br />
2 St. Savvas Anticancer Institute, Radiotherapy, Athens, Greece<br />
3 St. Savvas Anticancer Institute, Medical Physics, Athens, Greece<br />
4 St. Savvas Anticancer Institute, Pulmonary Disease, Athens, Greece<br />
: Currently, lung cancer is characterized by<br />
increasing incidence rate and minimal improvement in mortality rate.<br />
For this reason its therapeutic management is concidered to be one <strong>of</strong><br />
the most difficult tasks. About 40%<strong>of</strong> all lung cancers are<br />
adenocarcinoma, and about 1520% are nonsmall cell lung<br />
cancer(NSCLC) with squamous cells. In these cases,surgery <strong>of</strong>fers the<br />
best chance for cure. A 75% <strong>of</strong> the patients present locally advanced<br />
non resectable disease. For these patients Chemotherapy and/or<br />
External Radiation Therapy(ERT) are the treatments <strong>of</strong> choice,<br />
however,this therapeutic approach is associated with low survival and<br />
high rates <strong>of</strong> local recurrence. Recently EBBT has been applied in<br />
combination with ERT as the curative treatment <strong>of</strong> choice in selected<br />
primary bronchial and tracheal tumors. These treatment starts in our<br />
department since March 20<strong>10</strong>, for observing symptomatic response<br />
rates, duration <strong>of</strong> symptoms palliation, obstruction scores, quality <strong>of</strong><br />
life outcomes and complications in various patients groups.<br />
: Under bronchospopic quidance, a<br />
polyethelene catheter with a guide wire was placed into the involved<br />
airway and it was advanced until its edge passed by the lower end <strong>of</strong><br />
the tumor. The bronchoscope and guidewire were then removed,<br />
leaving the catheter in place. A radiopaque insert with marker pellets<br />
(dummy) was placed into the catheter to indicate the source positions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the high dose rate(HDR) Iridium source. This was fastened<br />
externally to the patient, after its proper placement had been<br />
confirmed fluoroscopically. Utilizing the bronchoscopic findings<br />
concering the tumor load and location, the radiation oncologist<br />
determined the radiation dosing. Two radiographs (anteroposterior<br />
and lateral) were acquried for treatment planning purposes<br />
(irradiation length and dwell time <strong>of</strong> the iridium source at various<br />
positions) using specialized s<strong>of</strong>tware. Fortyfive patients were<br />
treated, using a total EBBT dose <strong>of</strong> 16Gy, delivered in two by 8 Gy<br />
fractions, one fraction per week. Group A (patients with primary lung<br />
tumors), received 3050 Gy by ERT and two by 8 Gy EBBT fractions.<br />
Group B (patients with recurent or metastatic tumors), received two<br />
by 8 Gy EBBT fractions after ERT for palliative treatment <strong>of</strong> acute<br />
respiratory symptoms.<br />
: The overall symptomatic responce rates were 91% for<br />
dyspnea, 84% for cough, 94% for hemoptysis and 83% for obstructive<br />
pneumonia. There was no significant difference between the two<br />
groups. The median time to relapse <strong>of</strong> symptoms was 48 months for<br />
all symptoms and the median time for symptoms progression was 611<br />
months.<br />
: Endobronchial brachytherapy is an established modality<br />
for the palliation <strong>of</strong> advanced nosmall cell lung cancer, in the case <strong>of</strong><br />
endobronchial recurence after ERT, used for centrally localized lung<br />
cancer alone or in combination with ERT.<br />
PO387<br />
MANCHESTER SYSTEM TREATMENTS TO THE SKIN SURFACE; FROM<br />
RADIUM TO IRIDIUM HDR (1953 TO 20<strong>12</strong>)<br />
D. Wood 1 , S. Baker 1 , E. Allan 2 , H. Farrow 3<br />
1<br />
The Christie Hospital, <strong>Brachytherapy</strong>, Manchester, United Kingdom<br />
2<br />
The Christie Hospital, Clinical Oncology, Manchester, United<br />
Kingdom<br />
3<br />
The Christie Hospital, C.M.P.E., Manchester, United Kingdom<br />
: Skin surface mould treatments have been carried<br />
out using the classical Manchester system tables presented by<br />
Meredith in 1953, the only change since being the move to SI units.<br />
The tables provide for a given area and treatment height, the total<br />
source activity needed to give a unit <strong>of</strong> prescription dose at the skin<br />
surface, assuming a uniform distribution <strong>of</strong> sources around the<br />
treatment area, in accordance with Manchester system rules. The aim<br />
<strong>of</strong> this work is to assess how typical treatments using HDR, differ from<br />
that calculated assuming uniform source arrangements and flat<br />
geometry as in the classical Manchester system approach.<br />
: Manchester system distribution rules were<br />
used to determine source positioning for a variety <strong>of</strong> geometric<br />
phantom arrangements and patient treatments, and the treatment<br />
times calculated. The dose distributions were then assessed using<br />
Oncentra Brachy v4.0. against an array <strong>of</strong> surface dose points.<br />
: Air gaps were quantifiable in CT scans taken <strong>of</strong> the mould<br />
when fitted to the patient, this led to a reduction to dose at the skin<br />
surface by up to 15% for a 2mm air gap, and 32% for a 5mm air gap<br />
compared with assumed optimal treatment geometry.<br />
The arrangement <strong>of</strong> dwell positions around a near semicylinder or<br />
around an irregular area can lead to significant variation <strong>of</strong> the dose<br />
received at the skin surface compared with that for a flat treatment<br />
area considered to be equivalent in the system approach.<br />
a) Manchester system treatment times b) Optimised treatment times<br />
The Manchester tables are calculated assuming only inverse square<br />
law dose dependence. The additional effects <strong>of</strong> dose fall <strong>of</strong>f due to<br />
source anisotropy and absorption and scatter in water as per TG43<br />
calculations are significant, particularly for greater treatment<br />
distances above the skin surface.<br />
: It is advisable to correct calculation methodologies to<br />
account for individual treatment geometries, the assessment <strong>of</strong> air<br />
gaps, and more accurate source modelling, otherwise the treatment<br />
dose delivered at the skin surface may be significantly inaccurate.<br />
However, it is important when following a well established system<br />
approach to assess the treatment dose typically received before<br />
making informed modifications to individual treatment plans.<br />
PO388<br />
CONTACTHERAPY FOR CARCINOMA OF THE EYELID: A REPORT OF 29<br />
CASES.<br />
K. Benezery 1 , R. Natale 1 , A. Courdi 1 , M.E. Chand 1 , J. Lagier 2 , D.<br />
Flores 2 , S. Marcie 1 , M. Gauthier 1 , J. Feuillade 1 , J.P. Gerard 1<br />
1<br />
Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Radiotherapy, Nice, France<br />
2<br />
CHU St ROCH, Ophtalmologie, Nice, France<br />
: To assess the tolerance and efficacy <strong>of</strong> contact x<br />
ray therapy (CXR) in the management <strong>of</strong> eyelid tumours.<br />
: 29 patients were treated from February 2009<br />
to December 2011, using a RT 50 Philips or the new PAPILLON 50 unit<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 155<br />
delivering a 50kV maximal energy Xray beam. Out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 28<br />
patients, one had two synchronous tumours. Age ranged from 48 to 94<br />
years (median: 77.3), with a male female ratio <strong>of</strong> 1. Site: lateral<br />
canthus = 3 %, medial canthus = 31%, lower eyelid = 45 %, upper eyelid<br />
= 21 %. There were 80 % (23) basal cell carcinomas, 17% (5) squamous<br />
cell carcinoma, 3% (1) melanoma. No tumour exceeded T1b. Five<br />
patients were referred for radical radiotherapy treatment (first event)<br />
and twentyfour patients for postoperative treatment: among them,<br />
R0 excision = 2 (1 first event, 1 recurrence), R1 excision = 22 (15 first<br />
<strong>events</strong>, 7 recurrences). They were treated according to 2 schemes: 42<br />
Gy in six fractions <strong>of</strong> 7 Gy (23 %) for radical treatment, 35 Gy in 5<br />
fractions <strong>of</strong> 7 Gy (77 %) in case <strong>of</strong> postoperative treatment.<br />
: Followup ranged from 2 to 24 months. Five patients were<br />
lost to followup. One local relapse occurred 2 months after<br />
treatment, outside the treated area. Side effects: All patients had<br />
Grade I (55%) or II (45 %) erythema and loss <strong>of</strong> the eyelashes in the<br />
treated area during treatment. 17% had GI eye watering, <strong>10</strong>% suffered<br />
from a GII conjunctivitis, and 3% had a G II pilo sebaceous gland<br />
infection. Sequelae: persistent watering <strong>of</strong> the eye for 21%, xerosis for<br />
14%, one ectropion, one definitive loss <strong>of</strong> eyelashes and one with<br />
slightly depigmented skin. No cataract was observed. Majority <strong>of</strong><br />
patients assessed were more than satisfied with both the cosmetic<br />
and function that followed radiotherapy.<br />
: CXR therapy <strong>of</strong> the eyelid for skin carcinoma is an<br />
effective treatment, with no local relapse except one outside the<br />
treated area, with few significant side effects or sequelae in this<br />
elderly population.<br />
PO389<br />
INTERSTITIAL PERMANENT IMPLANTATION OF <strong>12</strong>5 I SEEDS FOR<br />
REFRACTORY CHEST WALL MATASTASIS OR RECURRENCE<br />
P. Jiang 1 , J. Wang 1 , Y. Jiang 1 , W. Jiang 1 , N.A. Meng 1 , R. Yang 1<br />
1<br />
Peking University Third Hospital, Radiotherapeutic Department,<br />
Beijing, China<br />
: To evaluate the efficacy and safety <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>5I seeds<br />
implantation for refractory chest wall matastasis or recurrence under<br />
CT guidance. In addition we assessed initial data obtained on the<br />
therapeutic response for refractory chest wall matastasis or<br />
recurrence.<br />
: A retrospective review <strong>of</strong> 20 patients ( from<br />
Jul,2004 to Jan, 2011) who underwent interstitial permanent<br />
implantation <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>5 I seeds under CT guidance. All patients had ever<br />
received at least one modality treatment before <strong>12</strong>5I seeds<br />
implantation and had been reviewed by the surgeons and radiation<br />
oncologists, that they were considered not suitable for salvage surgery<br />
and external beam radiation therapy again or the patients refused to<br />
receive. The tumor volumes were measured using CT scans at 5mm<br />
intervals 35days before seed implantation.Postoperative dosimetry<br />
was routinely performed for all patients. The D90 (the doses delivered<br />
to 90% <strong>of</strong> the target volume de?ned by CT using dosevolume<br />
histogram) <strong>of</strong> the implanted <strong>12</strong>5 I seeds ranged from <strong>10</strong>0Gy to 160Gy<br />
(median:130Gy). The activity <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>5 I seeds ranged from 0.5mCi to<br />
0.78mCi (median: 0.71mCi). The total number <strong>of</strong> seeds implanted<br />
ranged from 8 to 269 (median: 53). The followup period ranged from<br />
3 to 54 months(median: 11.5months). The survival and local control<br />
probabilities were calculated by the KaplanMeier method.<br />
: The 1 ,2,3and 4year tumor control rates were all 88.7%<br />
respectively. The 1 and 2,3,4year cancer specific survival rates<br />
were 56.5% and 47.1%, 47.1%, 47.1% respectively. The 1 and 2,3,4<br />
year overall survival rates were 53.3% and 35.6%, 35.6%, 35.6%<br />
respectively, with a median survival <strong>of</strong> 15 months (95% CI,7.0–22.9).<br />
Mild brachial plexus injury was seen in one patient, grade 1 or 2 skin<br />
reactions were seen in 6 patients (30%) who had received external<br />
beam radiation therapy before. No grade 3 and 4 skin side effects<br />
were found. Rib fracture, ulceration, pneumothorax or<br />
hemopneumothorax were not seen.<br />
: Interstitial permanent implantation <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>5 I seeds under<br />
CT guidance is feasible, efficacy and safe for refractory chest wall<br />
matastasis or recurrence.<br />
PO390<br />
INTRAOPERATIVE AND PERCUTANEOUS IR192 BRACHYTHERAPY FOR<br />
MULTIPLY IRRADIATED LESIONS OF THE SPINE<br />
Y. Yamada 1 , M.R. Folkert 1 , G.N. Cohen 2 , M. Zaider 2 , J. Chiu 2 , E. Lis 3 ,<br />
G. Krol 3 , M.H. Bilsky 4<br />
1<br />
Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, New<br />
York NY, USA<br />
2<br />
Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Medical Physics, New York<br />
NY, USA<br />
3<br />
Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Neuroradiology, New York<br />
NY, USA<br />
4<br />
Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Neurosurgery, New York<br />
NY, USA<br />
: While advances in stereotactic external beam<br />
radiation therapy have improved local control <strong>of</strong> spine metastases,<br />
progression <strong>of</strong> disease is still a significant problem and repeat<br />
irradiation is complicated by normal tissue tolerance, particularly that<br />
<strong>of</strong> the spinal cord. Intraoperative and percutaneous highdose rate<br />
brachytherapy techniques have been developed to address this issue<br />
and improve local control, pain control, and prevent progressive<br />
neurological deficits.<br />
: A series <strong>of</strong> patients were identified with<br />
progressive disease at multiply irradiated sites in the spine; 2 patients<br />
subsequently received intraoperative HDR brachytherapy using<br />
catheters placed in the vertebral bodies during surgery and 1 patient<br />
was treated with percutaneously implanted catheters with the<br />
assistance <strong>of</strong> interventional radiology. In all cases catheter placement<br />
was performed under general anesthesia; using either direct<br />
visualization or fluoroscopic guidance, trocars were placed into the<br />
vertebral body and pedicles, after which flexible afterloader
S156 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
catheters were placed through these trocars and the position <strong>of</strong> the<br />
catheters was confirmed by fluoroscopic imaging. A planning CT scan<br />
was taken in the treatment position; using this intraoperative CT scan<br />
and preoperative imaging, the patient's spinal cord/cauda, gross<br />
tumor volume and a clinical volume were contoured. A treatment plan<br />
was generated and following plan review and approval, the patients<br />
were treated with radiation delivered in a single fraction using high<br />
doserate Ir192 brachytherapy. All treatments were performed using<br />
a GammaMed Plus HDR Unit, after which the catheters were removed.<br />
Patients were reassessed clinically at 24 weeks and then with serial<br />
imaging and clinical assessment.<br />
: In all cases treatment was successfully delivered with no<br />
brachytherapyrelated complications. At a median followup <strong>of</strong> 5.7<br />
months, there has been no local progression <strong>of</strong> disease. Median dose<br />
delivered was 1400 cGy (range <strong>12</strong>001800 cGy) with a median GTV V90<br />
<strong>of</strong> 57% (range 4089%). In all cases the spinal cord/cauda maximum<br />
dose constraints were met. 2 patients (66.7%) had significant pain<br />
relief 14 weeks following treatment.<br />
: Intraoperative and percutaneous Ir192 HDR spine<br />
brachytherapy is not associated with complications or acute toxicity;<br />
while these therapeutic methodologies are in the early investigational<br />
stages, they may provide a safe and effective means <strong>of</strong> treating<br />
multiply irradiated sites <strong>of</strong> disease progression in the spine. In<br />
addition, use <strong>of</strong> the percutaneous technique provides a novel salvage<br />
treatment modality for patients who are not appropriate surgical<br />
candidates.<br />
PO391<br />
INTRAOPERATIVE BRACHYTHERAPY FOR THORACIC MALIGNANCIES<br />
RESECTED WITH CLOSE OR POSITIVE MARGINS<br />
A.J. Wu 1 , G.N. Cohen 2 , K.E. Rosenzweig 3 , M.J. Zelefsky 1 , M.S. Bains 4 ,<br />
A. Rimner 1<br />
1<br />
Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, New<br />
York NY, USA<br />
2<br />
Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Medical Physics, New York<br />
NY, USA<br />
3<br />
Mount Sinai Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, New York NY, USA<br />
4<br />
Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center, Thoracic Surgery, New York<br />
NY, USA<br />
: Local recurrence is a significant problem after<br />
surgical resection <strong>of</strong> thoracic malignancies, particularly when close or<br />
positive margins are anticipated. As intraoperative radiotherapy can<br />
deliver radiation directly to the threatened margin, we used this<br />
technique in an attempt to reduce local recurrence, particularly for<br />
patients who had already received external beam radiation. We<br />
reviewed our experience with thoracic intraoperative brachytherapy<br />
to assess disease control and toxicity outcomes.<br />
: We performed a retrospective review <strong>of</strong><br />
patients undergoing permanent I<strong>12</strong>5 mesh placement or temporary Ir<br />
192 afterloading therapy during surgical resection <strong>of</strong> primary or<br />
metastatic thoracic tumors between 2001 and 2011. In general, for I<br />
<strong>12</strong>5 brachytherapy, iodine seeds were sutured into a mesh at 1cm<br />
intervals to form a planar implant delivering <strong>10</strong>0150Gy to the MPD,<br />
which was then sutured onto the atrisk site. For Ir192<br />
brachytherapy, a HAM applicator was apposed to the atrisk site, then<br />
connected to the afterloader to deliver <strong>12</strong>15Gy to a depth <strong>of</strong> 0.5cm<br />
from the applicator surface.<br />
: Fortyone procedures (33 permanent, 8 temporary) were<br />
performed on 40 patients (2874 years old, median 57). Histology <strong>of</strong><br />
tumors was NSCLC (n=19), sarcoma (n=<strong>12</strong>), mesothelioma (n=2),<br />
thymic carcinoma (n=7) and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (n=1).<br />
Treated sites were lung (n=16), chest wall/paraspinal (n=16), and<br />
mediastinum (n=9). Twentysix patients had previously received EBRT<br />
to the area (median 50.4 Gy). Final margins were microscopically<br />
negative in 20 cases (49%) and positive or not assessable in the<br />
remainder. The median size <strong>of</strong> the treated area was 25cm 2 (range: 4<br />
70cm 2 ). The median followup was 30 months. Actuarial local control<br />
at 1 and 2 years was 74% and 67% respectively. Overall survival at 1<br />
and 2 years was 86% and 75% respectively. No perioperative deaths<br />
occurred. There was no significant difference in local control<br />
according to margin status or brachytherapy technique. Seven<br />
patients (17%) experienced toxicity possibly related to brachytherapy:<br />
4 patients required reoperation for empyema, 1 patient developed<br />
apparent bronchopleural fistula, and 1 patient developed possible<br />
radiation pneumonitis. One patient, who also had a distant history <strong>of</strong><br />
mantlefield irradiation for lymphoma, died from complications <strong>of</strong> SVC<br />
syndrome possibly related to radiation fibrosis, four years after<br />
brachytherapy.<br />
: Intraoperative brachytherapy is associated with good<br />
local control after resection <strong>of</strong> thoracic tumors felt to be at very high<br />
risk for recurrence due to close or positive margins. There does not<br />
appear to be an excessive rate <strong>of</strong> severe toxicity attributable to<br />
brachytherapy. Intraoperative brachytherapy should be considered in<br />
situations where the oncologic completeness <strong>of</strong> thoracic tumor<br />
resection is in doubt.<br />
PO392<br />
POSTOPERATIVE INTERSTITIAL PULSEDDOSERATE (PDR) BRACHY<br />
THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF THERAPYRESISTANT KELOIDS<br />
R. Davila Fajardo 1 , R. Van Os 1 , O. Lapid 2 , R. Noordanus 3 , B. Pieters 1<br />
1<br />
Academic Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The<br />
Netherlands<br />
2<br />
Academic Medical Center, Plastic Surgery, Amsterdam, The<br />
Netherlands<br />
3<br />
Flevoziekenhuis Hospital, Plastic Surgery, Almere, The Netherlands<br />
: To evaluate the results <strong>of</strong> pulseddoserate (PDR)<br />
brachytherapy after excision <strong>of</strong> the therapyresistant keloids treated<br />
between 2007 and 2011 in our institution.<br />
: Between July 2007 and December 2011, 24<br />
consecutive patients (11 male, 13 female), with 28 keloids were<br />
treated in our department with immediate adjuvant brachytherapy<br />
after surgical excision. Most <strong>of</strong> them appeared to be caused by<br />
previous trauma, surgery or infection. Histological keloid confirmation<br />
was obtained in 14% <strong>of</strong> the cases. In 91% <strong>of</strong> the patients the<br />
Fitzpatrick scale grade was recorded. Sixty four percent <strong>of</strong> the keloids<br />
had been previously treated either by surgical excision or intralesional<br />
steroid injections (KenacortA®), the rest conservatively. The median<br />
followup time was 7.2 months [range 034.4]. All keloids underwent<br />
surgical excision under local anaesthetic, placing <strong>of</strong> a plastic catheter<br />
(Best®) and the wound was primarily closed with subcutaneous<br />
suture. The irradiation was performed with a PDR afterloader device<br />
using an Ir192 source. One single fraction <strong>of</strong> 13Gy was administered<br />
with a <strong>10</strong>0% reference isodose line at the surface <strong>of</strong> the skin (47mm)<br />
in the central plane. Biologically effective dose (BED) 29.9Gy<br />
(α/β=<strong>10</strong>). Recurrence was defined as a growing nodular pruritic scar<br />
infield or beyond the surgical and irradiated area.<br />
: Recurrence free survival at <strong>12</strong> months was 80% (figure 1.<br />
KaplanMeier curve). The median time to recurrence was 5.3 months<br />
[range 034.4]. Four patients developed pruritus in a flat scar and<br />
they were treated with steroid injections with no growing nodular scar<br />
in the followup. These patients are not included in the recurrence<br />
group. Multivariate analysis showed the gender as significant factor<br />
for recurrence free survival to the detriment <strong>of</strong> male condition<br />
(p=0.04). While Fitzpatrick scale grade and location <strong>of</strong> the keloid<br />
were no significant factors for recurrence free survival (p=0.27 and<br />
p=0.54, respectively).Three patients developed hyperpigmentation <strong>of</strong><br />
the scar, grade1 as toxicity <strong>of</strong> the irradiation, probably also related to<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> steroids, and one hypopigmentation <strong>of</strong> the scar grade 1,<br />
(CTC 4.0). No second malignancy has been described.<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 157<br />
<br />
: Surgical excision followed by postoperative irradiation in<br />
the form <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy <strong>of</strong> the therapyresistant keloids <strong>of</strong>fers a<br />
reasonable good local control in the literature reviewed.<br />
Traditionally LDR and most recently HDR brachytherapy schemes have<br />
been reported with BED ≈30Gy, showing low recurrence rate.<br />
This comfortable PDR scheme consisting <strong>of</strong> 13Gy in a single fraction<br />
and one pulse provides a similar recurrence free survival to previous<br />
described, with a low toxicity rate.<br />
PO393<br />
<strong>12</strong>5I SEEDS BRACHYTHERAPY TO TREAT MALIGNANT SUBLINGUAL<br />
GLAND TUMORS<br />
Y. Shi 1 , M.W. Huang 1 , L. Zheng 1 , S.M. Liu 1 , J. Zhang 1 , J.G. Zhang 1<br />
1<br />
Peking University School <strong>of</strong> Stomatology, Oral & Maxill<strong>of</strong>acial<br />
Sugery, Beijing, China<br />
: The goal <strong>of</strong> the study is to conclude local control<br />
rate, survival rate <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy using <strong>12</strong>5 I radioactive seeds for<br />
treating malignant sublingual gland tumors.<br />
: Twentyone patients <strong>of</strong> sublingual gland<br />
derived malignant tumor, including nine males and twelve females,<br />
median age 51, were collected in the study. There were 16 adenoid<br />
cystic carcinoma, 3 mucoepidermoid carcinoma, 1 adenoid carcinoma<br />
and 1 malignant pleomorphic adenoma. Twenty patients were treated<br />
by surgical resection, eleven were local tumor resection and nine<br />
were composite procedures, including four segmental<br />
mandibulectomy and five marginal jaw resection. Selective neck<br />
resection was performed in 7 patients. These twenty patients<br />
received <strong>12</strong>5 I seeds interstitial brachytherapy after surgery. One<br />
patient couldn’t afford surgery and received brachytherapy alone.<br />
<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> were designed by treatment planning system. Patients<br />
were implanted a mean amount <strong>of</strong> 39.8 seeds, ranging from 8~92. The<br />
total seeds activity is 31.0mCi (1147MBq) on average. The prescription<br />
dose ranged from 60~<strong>12</strong>0Gy. Each patient received quality verification<br />
and was followed up.<br />
: Twentyone patients were followed up for 16~113 months<br />
(median 44 months). There were one local recurrence and four distant<br />
metastasis, including two died <strong>of</strong> lung metastasis. No severe<br />
complications such as osteomyelitis were observed. The local control<br />
rate is 95.2%. Oneyear and threeyear survival rate is <strong>10</strong>0% and<br />
85.8%. Threeyear survival rate with and without distant metastasis<br />
are <strong>10</strong>0% and 50% respectively (P
S158 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
up <strong>of</strong> the patients was done to analyze acute and late toxicity, local<br />
control and survival.<br />
: After a median follow up <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong> months (range 2 28 months),<br />
s<strong>of</strong>t tissue necrosis was seen in one patient, dysphaia and hemorrhage<br />
in another. No other serious side effects were observed. All the tumor<br />
mass <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> cases disappeared within 6 months, regional metastases<br />
was observed in one patient and distant metastases was observed in<br />
another. Seven <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> patients survived till the date <strong>of</strong> investigation.<br />
: External beam radiotherapy plus I<strong>12</strong>5 seeds<br />
implantation is a safe and effective therapy regimen for patients with<br />
unresectable head and neck cancers.<br />
PO396<br />
I<strong>12</strong>5 BRACHYTHERAPY FOR LOCALLY RECURRENT PAROTID GLAND<br />
CANCER IN PREVIOUSLY IRRADIATED PATIENTS<br />
L. Zheng 1 , J.G. Zhang 1 , J. Zhang 1 , T.L. Song 1 , M.W. Huang 1 , G.Y. Yu 1<br />
1<br />
The Stomotology School and Hospital <strong>of</strong> Peking University, Oral and<br />
Maxill<strong>of</strong>acial Surgery Department, Beijing, China<br />
: This study analyzed the treatment <strong>of</strong> recurrent<br />
parotid gland cancers with radioactive iodine (<strong>12</strong>5I) seed<br />
implantation.<br />
: Fifteen patients with recurrent previously<br />
irradiated parotid gland cancers were treated with postoperative <strong>12</strong>5I<br />
seed implantation between April 2004 and June 2009. Local control,<br />
survival rates and side effects were retrospectively reviewed.<br />
: The 3 and 5year local control rates were 67% and 53.6%,<br />
and the overall survival rates were 76.2% and 66.7%, respectively.<br />
Four HouseBrackman grade IV patients recovered to grade II during<br />
followup. Four patients (26.7%) developed grade IV skin ulceration.<br />
Two patients (13.3%) developed moderate fibrosis <strong>of</strong> the subcutaneous<br />
tissues, and two (13.3%) suffered hearing loss for 1 year after<br />
brachytherapy. There were no severe late toxicities.<br />
: This study showed improved local control and survival<br />
rates in patients who received <strong>12</strong>5I brachytherapy. These findings<br />
should be interpreted cautiously due to the small number <strong>of</strong> patients.<br />
PO397<br />
32PFOILS FOR RADIOACTIVE IMPLANTS IN LOWDOSERATE (LDR)<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
W. Assmann 1 , M. Bader 2 , J. Schirra 3 , C. Schäfer 3 , R. Sroka 4 , C. Stief 2<br />
1<br />
Ludwig Maximilians Universtät München, Fakultät für Physik,<br />
Garching, Germany<br />
2<br />
LMU Klinikum Großhadern, Urologische Klinik, München, Germany<br />
3<br />
LMU Klinikum Großhadern, Medizinische Klinik II, München, Germany<br />
4<br />
LMU Klinikum Großhadern, Laserforschungslabor, München, Germany<br />
: LDR brachytherapy can modulate wound healing<br />
avoiding hyperproliferation and benign stenosis <strong>of</strong> endogenous tubular<br />
structures such as bile duct or urethra. Till now, however, there is no<br />
suited applicator available. The aim <strong>of</strong> this project was to develop a<br />
new polymer based foil containing radioactive 32P which fits to the<br />
usual urethra catheter or bile duct stent, but would be also suitable<br />
for similar other applications.<br />
: Polymer foils filled with up to <strong>10</strong>% 31P have<br />
been produced and tested for their radiation resistance during<br />
neutron activation <strong>of</strong> 31P to 32P, washout behavior and dose<br />
distribution. The therapeutic range <strong>of</strong> the pure electron emitter 32P<br />
(Emax = 1.7 MeV, T1/2 = 14.3 d) is known to be only a few millimeters<br />
delivering minimal dose to the healthy tissue surrounding the treated<br />
stenosis. Measured dose distributions were confirmed by Geant4<br />
simulation. Within a feasibility study on rabbits and swine, a benign<br />
stenosis was induced endoscopically by laser or heat in the urethra<br />
and the common bile duct, respectively. After activation radioactive<br />
32Pfoils were wrapped around and fixed on usual implants (catheter,<br />
stent), and inserted after balloon dilatation to locally irradiate the<br />
wounded stenosis tissue. For radiation protection, a <strong>10</strong> mm thick<br />
plexiglass enclosure <strong>of</strong> the implants was sufficient.<br />
: The novel radioactive 32Pfoil allows for the usual stent or<br />
catheter application with additional LDRbrachytherapy to prevent<br />
stenosis formation. Animal tests applying 0, 15 and 30 Gy within 7<br />
days have not shown adverse dose effects in histology <strong>of</strong> the target<br />
tissue, but dose finding studies have to be made. Handling and<br />
radiation protection was found to be very easy, and no radioactive<br />
contamination has been measured.<br />
: This newly developed 32Pfoil <strong>of</strong>fers a simple and save<br />
way to irradiate very precisely tissue with a dose up to some 60 Gy,<br />
therefore after animal studies now clinical tests for the urethra are in<br />
preparation. These flexible and thin radioactive foils can be applied in<br />
a lot more cases, where hyperproliferation causes problems, and even<br />
in radiobiological experiments. To cover a wider dose range, for<br />
example to irradiate malign proliferation, foils containing 192Ir are<br />
under development.<br />
PO398<br />
RADIOACTIVITY SEEDS INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY TREATING<br />
MALIGNANT SALIVARY GLAND TUMORS<br />
J. Zhang 1 , L. Zheng 1 , M.W. Huang 1 , L.F. Jia 1 , Y. Shi 1 , G.Y. Yu 1 , J.G.<br />
Zhang 1<br />
1<br />
The Stomotology School and Hospital <strong>of</strong> Peking University, Oral and<br />
Maxill<strong>of</strong>acial Surgery Department, Beijing, China<br />
: To detect the efficacy <strong>of</strong> radioactive seeds<br />
implanting treating malignant salivary gland tumors.<br />
: Fortythree patients with malignant salivary<br />
gland tumors <strong>of</strong> head neck were treated at Peking University<br />
stomatologic hospital with radioactivity seeds brachytherapy between<br />
the years 2001 and 2008. These patients were implanted <strong>12</strong>5I with<br />
dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>12</strong>0160Gy. The treatment response, local control rate and<br />
survive rate were evaluated and the adverse <strong>events</strong> were observed.<br />
: Tumors <strong>of</strong> twentynine patients were got complete<br />
remission(CR), tumors <strong>of</strong> seven patients were partial remission(PR),<br />
the response rate was 83.7%. The patients were followed up 848<br />
months (median 21 months), local control rate was 79%, total survival<br />
rate was 76.7%. No serious side radiotherapeutic effect was observed.<br />
: Radioactivity seeds interstitial brachytherapy is an<br />
effective form <strong>of</strong> treatment for patients with unresectable malignant<br />
salivary gland tumors.<br />
PO399<br />
HDR INTENSTINAL BRACHYTERAPY AS A SALVAGE TREATMENT IN<br />
RECTAL ADENOCARCINOMA PATIENTS<br />
T. Filipowski 1 , W. Markiewicz 2 , D.E. Kazberuk 1 , A. SzmigielTrzcinska 1 ,<br />
M. Niksa 1 , B. PancewiczJanczuk 3 , W. Nowik 3<br />
1<br />
Comprehensive Cancer Center Bialystok, Radiation Oncology,<br />
Bialystok, Poland<br />
2<br />
Comprehensive Cancer Center Bialystok, Oncological Surgery,<br />
Bialystok, Poland<br />
3<br />
Comprehensive Cancer Center Bialystok, Physics, Bialystok, Poland<br />
: To analyze efficacy and toxicity pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> salvage<br />
intenstinal brachytherapy HDR in rectal Anenocarcinoma patients<br />
after tumorectomy who refused or was not classified to the radical<br />
resection.<br />
: Between April 2009 and July 2011, 8 patients<br />
(pts) with rectal Adenocarinoma underwent conformal HDR<br />
brachytherapy (HDRBRT) with a temporary intenstinal implant ( 35<br />
cathetters) The mean age <strong>of</strong> pts was 71years,. 6 <strong>of</strong> patients received<br />
30 Gy in 5 days 3 Gy per fraction twice daily, one <strong>of</strong> patients received<br />
24 Gy in 4 days, 4 Gy per fraction, one <strong>of</strong> the patient received <strong>10</strong> Gy<br />
single fraction. The plan was prepared in 3D based on CT and<br />
Oncentra Master plan and PLATO planning s<strong>of</strong>tware. Dose volume<br />
constraints for this planning system included for target: V <strong>10</strong>0,<br />
V150,V200, D90. Patient were monitored weekly during radiotherapy<br />
and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 15 months after the end <strong>of</strong> treatment and then at<br />
three months interval. Followup visit included clinical and surgical<br />
examination, radiology exam (Ultrasoun <strong>of</strong> abdomen and liver and<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 159<br />
chest Xray) and CEA value assesment. The acute toxicities were<br />
graded according to the EORTC/RTOG scales.<br />
: Median follow up was 8 months (153) with <strong>10</strong>0% diseasefree<br />
survival rate. The most common symptoms were: pain, swelling,<br />
bleeding, thin stool, rectal urgency, frequency and tenesmus and<br />
acute proctitis was observed. 20 % grade 4 acute toxicities were<br />
recorded. However overall survival data need longer followup.<br />
: HDRBRT is a valid anal sphincter sparing treatment<br />
modality for selected patients. HDRBRT has an important role in<br />
achieving dose escalation for some patients. The treatment was well<br />
tolerated by majority <strong>of</strong> patients with acceptable degree <strong>of</strong> acute<br />
toxicities. Overall survival data need longer followup.<br />
PO400<br />
THE CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF SURFACE HDR LEIPZIG APPLICATORS<br />
I. Ozbay 1 , S. Kucucuk 2 , M. Fayda 2 , B. Serarslan 2 , A. Kizir 2 , E.N. Oral 2 ,<br />
E.K. Saglam 2 , A. Fathalizadeh 2 , G. Kemikler 1 , I. Aslay 2<br />
1<br />
Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Medical Physics, Istanbul,<br />
Turkey<br />
2<br />
Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Radiation Oncology, Istanbul,<br />
Turkey<br />
: The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is to evaluate our initial<br />
experience with surface Leipzig applicators <strong>of</strong> microSelectronHDR<br />
afterloader (Nucletron).<br />
: Between January 2011 and January 20<strong>12</strong>, 15<br />
patients with 18 lesions were treated with Leipzig applicators at our<br />
institution. The median age <strong>of</strong> patients was 69 (2690). Skin tumors<br />
were the main indication for treatment with 7 basal cell cancer (BCC),<br />
6 squamous cell cancer (SCC), 3 Kaposi’s sarcoma, one keloid and one<br />
hemangioma cases treated. Another patient was treated for two<br />
buccal mucosa tumors. Initial management was incisional biopsy in 13<br />
cases, excision with positive margins in 3 cases, total excision before<br />
RT in one keloid case and one lip hemangioma case with no prior<br />
treatment. Five lesions were treated previously. One keloid case was<br />
removed three years prior, one skin cancer case had cryotherapy,<br />
another skin lesion was externally irradiated six months previously and<br />
two oral cavity lesions were externally irradiated prior to using the<br />
surface applicator. All <strong>of</strong> the lesions were on the head except two<br />
cases <strong>of</strong> Kaposi’s sarcoma involving the toes. In <strong>12</strong> cases, the patients<br />
were treated with 3 fractions per week, in 4 cases, 5 fractions per<br />
week, one case used 2 fractions per week, and one <strong>of</strong> the keloid cases<br />
was treated BID in three consecutive days. The characteristics <strong>of</strong> the<br />
treatments are provided in the table. The typical use <strong>of</strong> the Leipzig<br />
applicator is shown (see photo).<br />
Median MinMax<br />
Age 69 2690<br />
Size <strong>of</strong> the lesion (cm) 1.4 0.52.5<br />
Leipzig applicator dimension (cm) 2 13<br />
Reference depth (mm) 3 35<br />
Dose per fraction (Gy) 4 2.5<strong>10</strong><br />
Number <strong>of</strong> fractions <strong>10</strong> 314<br />
Total dose (Gy) 37 967.5<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> fraction per week 3 (mode) 25<br />
Followup (months) 3 111<br />
<br />
: All <strong>of</strong> the patients tolerated the treatment very well. The<br />
median followup time was 3 (111) months. Four patients had grade 2<br />
acute mucositis, two patients had grade 1 skin reactions and one<br />
patient had grade 3 mucositis treated with topical steroids. Most <strong>of</strong><br />
the acute reactions resolved within the first month. One case<br />
experienced hypopigmentation and the patient with two oral cavity<br />
lesions developed necrotic tissue on the treated areas. The overall<br />
tumor response was 95% for patients with gross tumors at a six week<br />
followup.<br />
: The treating <strong>of</strong> small targets especially on the face is<br />
associated with some difficulties. Cosmetic results in this area are <strong>of</strong><br />
great importance. The dosimetric uncertainties <strong>of</strong> the small fields<br />
should be managed individually especially during external beam<br />
radiation with electrons. The longer treatment time is not easily<br />
tolerated by elderly patients with multiple comorbidities. The surface<br />
Leipzig applicators <strong>of</strong> microSelectronHDR afterloader may help to<br />
irradiate superficial small tumors located on the skin and mucosal<br />
surfaces by using larger fraction sizes allowing for the use <strong>of</strong> fewer<br />
fractions. Long term followup is needed to evaluate long term local<br />
control and cosmetic results.<br />
PO401<br />
MRIBASED RECTAL APPLICATOR RECONSTRUCTION IN HDR RECTAL<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
A. BeikiArdakani 1 , A. Simeonov 1 , R. Wong 2 , J. Jezioranski 1<br />
1 Princess Margaret Hospital, Radiation Physics, Toronto, Canada<br />
2 Princess Margaret Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada<br />
: To date, only CT images are used for treatment<br />
planning in High Dose Rate (HDR) rectal <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> (BT). The<br />
major challenge <strong>of</strong> MRIbased HDR rectal BT has been the lack <strong>of</strong><br />
adequate visualization <strong>of</strong> the HDR applicator and catheter.<br />
Consequently, CT is generally used for catheter reconstruction in the<br />
treatment planning system. One disadvantage <strong>of</strong> using two imaging<br />
modalities MR for target delineation and CT for catheter<br />
reconstruction is patient motion between the two scans, which may<br />
create a large uncertainty in image fusion. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study<br />
was to assess the performance <strong>of</strong> a 3D volumetric interpolated breath<br />
hold sequence (VIBE) for both target delineation and catheter<br />
reconstruction in HDR rectal BT.<br />
: Recently, the 3D VIBE sequence (a modified<br />
fast 3D gradientecho sequence), has been used to acquire T1<br />
weighted images in a clinical wholebody MRI. This sequence may<br />
provide isotropic or nearisotropic resolution in three dimensions,<br />
while preserving wide anatomic coverage in a short acquisition time.<br />
Motion artifacts and accompanying partial volume averaging effects<br />
are also reduced by the rapid data acquisition, resulting in high<br />
quality 3D MR images. We obtained T1weighted images through the<br />
rectal applicator using the VIBE sequence and then used Nucletron<br />
reconstruction s<strong>of</strong>tware to generate 3D MR images <strong>of</strong> the HDR rectal<br />
applicator. MRI was performed on a 3T MR unit (Siemens Medical<br />
Solutions) using a phasedarray body coil. T1weighted images <strong>of</strong> the<br />
rectal applicator in both phantom and a test patient were obtained<br />
using VIBE (TR/TE, 4.75/2.53; flip angle, 15°; field <strong>of</strong> view, 400 mm;<br />
slice thickness, 3 mm; section gap, 0–0.5 mm; number <strong>of</strong> slices, 30–40;<br />
image matrix, 256 [interpolation, 5<strong>12</strong>]; bandwidth, 490 Hz/pixel; 1<br />
signal acquisition; scanning time, 60 seconds). Using the 3D VIBE<br />
sequence we were able to not only visualize the tumor and Organs at<br />
Risk (OARs) but also the rectal applicator as well as the catheter<br />
channels for purposes <strong>of</strong> treatment planning (Fig 1). The validity <strong>of</strong><br />
the 3D VIBE sequence was evaluated using T2 weighted MR and CT<br />
images in a specially designed phantom as well as a test patent.
S160 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
Fig 1: Left: T2 vs 3D VIBE, minimal shift was observed for central<br />
channel in applicator for test patient. right; CT vs 3D VIBE with<br />
horizontal frequency encoding causing 1mm applicator shift to right<br />
: The 3D VIBE sequence introduces a maximum 1 mm chemical<br />
shift <strong>of</strong> the Rectal Applicator relative to surrounding s<strong>of</strong>t tissue<br />
equivalent material (both in phantom and test patient) in the<br />
direction <strong>of</strong> frequency encoding relative to CT and T2 weight MR<br />
images. This shift can be corrected during catheter reconstruction or<br />
reduced by using a higher bandwidth acquisition.<br />
: Our study has shown that the 3D VIBE sequence can be<br />
used for both target delineation and catheter reconstruction for<br />
treatment planning <strong>of</strong> HDR rectal BT, with a maximum spatial<br />
uncertainty <strong>of</strong> 1mm.<br />
PO402<br />
HDR BRACHYTHERAPY GIVES RAPID TUMOR RESPONSE AND LOW<br />
NORMAL TISSUE TOXICITY IN NONMELANOMA SKIN CANCER OF THE<br />
FACE<br />
R. Kumar 1 , R. Hobbs 1 , A. HackerPrietz 1 , H. Quon 1 , A. Wild 1 , T. Wang 2 ,<br />
E. Armour 1 , J.M. Herman 1<br />
1<br />
The Johns Hopkins University, Radiation Oncology and Molecular<br />
Radiation Sciences, Baltimore, USA<br />
2<br />
The Johns Hopkins University, Dermatology, Baltimore, USA<br />
: Nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most<br />
common malignancy in the United States with over 2,000,000 cases<br />
diagnosed in 20<strong>10</strong>. Electron beam radiation has been historically used<br />
in poor surgical cases. In this study, we analyzed the dosimetry <strong>of</strong> HDR<br />
brachytherapy (HDR BT) vs electron beam irradiation in the treatment<br />
<strong>of</strong> NMSC <strong>of</strong> the bilateral face.<br />
: Our patient is a 66 year old male with a<br />
history <strong>of</strong> rheumatoid arthritis on chronic immunosuppression, and a<br />
long history <strong>of</strong> multiple NMSC lesions, including those on the bilateral<br />
face. Multiple biopsies and resections had been performed, but his<br />
disease was refractory to MOHS resection, topical agents, and oral<br />
agents. CT simulation was performed with immobilization achieved by<br />
an aquaplast mask. The visible lesions were marked with radioopaque<br />
wire and BB. A Freiburg® flap was applied under the mask and molded<br />
to maintain contact with the patient's skin. Catheters were inserted<br />
into the flap and connected to a remote source. The patient was<br />
treated with 400 cGy fractions <strong>of</strong> HDR BT to a total <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> fractions<br />
(total dose <strong>of</strong> 4000 cGy). A dosimetric comparison was simultaneously<br />
performed using the Pinnacle® planning system. The comparison dose<br />
was with a 6MV electron beam using a 5 mm tissue bolus to a dose <strong>of</strong><br />
55 Gy in 20 fractions (2.75 Gy/fraction). The BED<strong>10</strong>Gy was 70.13 Gy for<br />
electrons vs 56.00 Gy for brachytherapy; the BED3Gy was <strong>10</strong>5.4 Gy for<br />
electrons vs 93.33 Gy for brachy. The dose to head and neck critical<br />
structures was compared between the two treatment plans.<br />
: The patient experienced visible clinical improvement by<br />
fraction 4 <strong>of</strong> the HDR BT. Nearcomplete resolution <strong>of</strong> his bilateral<br />
cheek disease was observed by fraction 8. Treatment was completed<br />
on a 23 doses/week fractionation schedule. A treatment break <strong>of</strong> 5<br />
days was provided after fraction 4 to the patient to allow for toxicity<br />
improvement. Only grade 2 skin erythema was noted, no other acute<br />
toxicity was described. Resimulation <strong>of</strong> the patient was performed on<br />
treatment day 3 to ensure accurate patient alignment in the<br />
immobilization system. Less than 1 mm <strong>of</strong> patient motion was<br />
observed.<br />
Electron (Gy) HDR Brachy (Gy)<br />
Left GTV 51.30 51.00 (avg)<br />
Right GTV 52.87 54.37 (avg)<br />
Brain 40.28 17.74 (max)<br />
Thyroid 3.30 1.<strong>12</strong> (avg)<br />
Mandible 32.16 20.80 (max)<br />
Oral cavity 44.42 20.<strong>10</strong> (max)<br />
Left Parotid 26.07 16.99 (avg)<br />
(Right parotid previously excised)<br />
Left Globe 52.99 15.94 (max)<br />
Right Globe 1.29 8.63 (max)<br />
Left Cochlea 0.97 7.78 (avg)<br />
Right Cochlea 0.93 8.06 (max)<br />
Left masseter 59.45 25.64 (max)<br />
Right masseter 59.57 29.23 (max)<br />
: The clinical response <strong>of</strong> our patient was dramatic (image<br />
below). The potential dosimetric advantage <strong>of</strong> this technique over<br />
electron beam irradiation is significant in terms <strong>of</strong> both acute and late<br />
radiation toxicity, especially when the relatively higher BED <strong>of</strong> the<br />
electron plan is noted. Additionally, the fractionation <strong>of</strong> the HDR BT<br />
method may theoretically allow for increased normal tissue repair.<br />
However, longterm follow up is necessary to address the potential<br />
late toxicity <strong>of</strong> this treatment method, and the comparison <strong>of</strong> HDR BT<br />
to electron beam irradiation should be addressed prospectively.<br />
PO403<br />
ENDOSCOPIC GUIDED BRACHYTHERAPY (EGBT)FOR SINONASAL AND<br />
NASOPHARYNGEAL RECURRENCES<br />
F. Bussu 1 , L. Tagliaferri 2 , M. Rigante 1 , F. Miccichè 2 , N. Dinapoli 2 , R.<br />
Autorino 2 , G. Almadori 1 , G. Paludetti 1 , V. Valentini 1 , G. Kovacs 1<br />
1<br />
Università Cattolica del Sacro CuorePoliclinico A. Gemelli,<br />
Otorhinolaryngology, Rome, Italy<br />
2<br />
Università Cattolica del Sacro CuorePoliclinico A. Gemelli,<br />
Radiotherapy, Rome, Italy<br />
: In recurrences <strong>of</strong> a nasopharyngeal or sinonasal<br />
malignancy after a full course <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy second clinically<br />
effective dose <strong>of</strong> external beam radiotherapy leads to high toxicity<br />
rates. <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> may improve the outcome with a more<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 161<br />
conformed dose. Endoscopic surgery <strong>of</strong>fers advantages as it is<br />
minimally invasive, however, still not fully validated, especially for<br />
recurrences, and exceptionable for issues about radicality. In this<br />
setting the possibility to deliver an adjuvant irradiation by catheters<br />
positioned on the high risk areas <strong>of</strong> the surgical bed under direct<br />
endoscopic vision may definitely increase the chances for local<br />
control. In the present work we evaluate the outcome <strong>of</strong> combined<br />
endoscopic surgery and perioperative brachytherapy.<br />
: Local recurrences following a full course <strong>of</strong><br />
radiotherapy were resected by an endoscopic approach and plastic<br />
tubes were intraoperatively fixed to the surgical bed. In the<br />
nasopharyngeal cases we stabilized the blind tubes by suturing them<br />
on the nasal packing and the 2ways catheters by through stitches on<br />
the cartilaginous septum. In sinonasal cases we stabilized the blind<br />
catheters passing them through tunnels drilled in the maxillary bone,<br />
pushing them to adhere to the target area by nasal packing under<br />
endoscopic vision and then suturing them to the skin. The irradiation<br />
dose was 30 Gy in <strong>12</strong> fractions, 2.5 Gy each, twice a day, in 6 days.<br />
The nasal packing and the catheters were removed at the end <strong>of</strong><br />
irradiation course. We calculated the overall and relapse free survival<br />
starting from the day <strong>of</strong> the procedure.<br />
: We enrolled 3 patients with recurrences <strong>of</strong> sinonasal<br />
malignancies (2 adenocarcinomas, 1 adenoidcystic carcinoma),<br />
already treated by surgery and adjuvant irradiation, and 2 patients<br />
with recurrent nasopharyngeal SCC, both treated by<br />
chemoradiotherapy (70 Gy+ cis q21). Median follow up was 8 months.<br />
4 out <strong>of</strong> 5 patients are still alive with no evidence <strong>of</strong> disease. 1 <strong>of</strong><br />
them (nasopharyngeal SCC) is dead for massive bleeding 2 months<br />
after the procedure. In 1 case (recurrence <strong>of</strong> an adenoid cystic<br />
carcinoma <strong>of</strong> the coana) we had a transient deficit <strong>of</strong> the VI cranial<br />
nerve, totally solved after 2 weeks <strong>of</strong> steroids.<br />
: Combination <strong>of</strong> the endoscopic approach for removal <strong>of</strong><br />
recurrence and perioperative brachytherapy seems to be an effective<br />
option for treating local recurrences. The morbidity <strong>of</strong> the endoscopic<br />
approach is minimal, perioperative radiation can start the day after.<br />
The endoscopic approach allows an optimal catheter positioning with<br />
an extraordinary exposure and anatomic detail; on the other hand the<br />
combination with brachytherapy may lead to enlarge the indications<br />
for an endoscopic approach in the salvage <strong>of</strong> sinonasal recurrences.<br />
PO404<br />
VOXELIZED DOSERESPONSE STUDY IN HIGH DOSE RATE (HDR) 192IR<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY FOR RECTAL CANCER<br />
R.F. Hobbs 1 , Y. Le 1 , E.P. Armour 1 , J. Efron 2 , N. Azad 3 , L. Diaz 3 , H.<br />
Qiu 3 , G. Sgouros 4 , S.L. Gearhart 2 , J.M. Herman 1<br />
1 Johns Hopkins University, Radiation Oncology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />
2 Johns Hopkins University, Surgery, Baltimore MD, USA<br />
3 Johns Hopkins University, Oncology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />
4 Johns Hopkins University, Radiology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />
: Doseresponse studies in radiation therapy are<br />
typically using single response values for tumors across ensembles <strong>of</strong><br />
tumors. Using the HDR treatment plan dose grid and voxelized pre<br />
and posttherapy FDGPET images, we show correlations between<br />
voxelized dose and FDG uptake response in individual tumors.<br />
: Five patients were treated for localized<br />
rectal cancer using 192 Ir high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy in<br />
conjunction with surgery. FDGPET images were acquired before HDR<br />
therapy and 68 weeks after treatment (prior to surgery). Treatment<br />
planning was done on a commercial workstation and the dose grid was<br />
calculated. The two PETs and the treatment dose grid were registered<br />
to each other. The difference in PET SUV values before and after HDR<br />
was plotted versus absorbed radiation dose for each voxel (left<br />
figure). The voxels were then separated into bins for every 400 cGy <strong>of</strong><br />
absorbed dose and the bin average values plotted similarly (right<br />
figure)<br />
: Four <strong>of</strong> the five patients showed a significant positive<br />
correlation (R 2 = 0.18, 0.70, 0.81, 0.82 and 0.89, respectively)<br />
between PET uptake difference in the targeted region and the<br />
absorbed dose for the binned voxels (see figure).<br />
: By considering larger ensembles <strong>of</strong> voxels, such as <strong>org</strong>an<br />
average absorbed dose or the dose bins considered here, valuable<br />
information may be obtained. The doseresponse correlations as<br />
measured by FDGPET difference potentially underlines the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> FDGPET as a measure <strong>of</strong> response, as well as the value<br />
<strong>of</strong> voxelized information.<br />
PO405<br />
EARLY INTERVENTION WITH SELECTIVE INTERNAL RADIATION THERAPY<br />
(SIRT) IMPROVES SURVIVAL AND LOCAL/SYSTEMIC OPTIONS<br />
N. Sharma 1 , E.M. Nichols 1 , S. Grabowski 1 , P. Amin 1 , M. Gar<strong>of</strong>alo 1 , A.<br />
Hanlon 2 , N. Hanna 3 , R. Patel 4 , M. Horiba 5 , F. Moeslein 4<br />
1 University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, Radiation Oncology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />
2 University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, Biostatistics, Baltimore MD, USA<br />
3 University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, Surgical Oncology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />
4 University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, Interventional Radiology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />
5 University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, Medical Oncology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />
: Hepatic brachytherapy with selective internal<br />
radiation therapy (SIRT) using Y90 resin microspheres (SIRSpheres)<br />
has been extensively described in the treatment <strong>of</strong> metastatic<br />
colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, its application as a treatment<br />
modality in other tumor types has been documented primarily through<br />
small case series and data regarding optimal timing <strong>of</strong> treatment and<br />
patient selection are still emerging. We reviewed our large single<br />
institutional experience with this modality in patients with adequate<br />
staging and multidisciplinary oncologic management.<br />
: Records <strong>of</strong> all patients undergoing SIRT after<br />
determination <strong>of</strong> appropriate eligibility by our multidisciplinary<br />
hepatobiliary tumor board between 3/2002 4/2011 were reviewed on<br />
an IRB approved protocol. Appropriate laboratory and imaging workup<br />
was performed to determine liver function, tumor burden and extent<br />
<strong>of</strong> extrahepatic disease. Hepatic angiography and macroaggregated<br />
albumin perfusion scans were performed to assess liver anatomy and<br />
lung shunting. Meticulous coil embolization <strong>of</strong> collateral vesselsat<br />
risk was performed. Patients were typically treated with initial<br />
infusion to the hepatic lobe with more extensive disease followed by<br />
treatment to the contralateral lobe 34 weeks later using an<br />
individualized dose <strong>of</strong> Y90. Followup imaging was performed 3<br />
months later and systemic therapy was as per the treating medical<br />
oncologist. Uni and multivariable statistical analyses were<br />
performed to determine variables associated with OS.<br />
: 1<strong>12</strong> patients with complete data were evaluated with the<br />
following tumor types: Colorectal cancer (N=64, 57%), hepatocellular<br />
(N=9), esophageal (N=7), neuroendocrine (N=6), breast (N=5) and<br />
other (N=21). Mean patient age was 59 (<strong>12</strong>.6), 58 (11.0) for CRC<br />
cancer patients. Median OS for the entire cohort was 29 months from<br />
initial diagnosis and 8 months from date <strong>of</strong> 1st Y90 treatment. Log<br />
Rank analysis demonstrated rate <strong>of</strong> death in patients with ≥5 lesions<br />
was twice that in patients with
S162 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
survival and allows, more importantly, for more extensive systemic<br />
management through delivery <strong>of</strong> more chemotherapy cycles.<br />
PO406<br />
NON MELANOMA SKIN CANCER TREATED WITH SUPERFICIAL<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY (BQT) OF HIGH DOSE RATE (HDR) WITH LEIPZIG OR<br />
MOULD<br />
M. VillavicencioQueijeiro 1 , B.H.Y. Bautista Hernandez Yicel 1 , M.M.J.<br />
Montoya Monterrubio Juan 1 , L.C.P. Lujan Castilla Pomponio 1 , F.M.S.<br />
Fuentes Mariles Sonia 1 , R.V.D. Ruesga Vazquez Daniel 1<br />
1<br />
Hospital General de Mexico (Goverment), Département de Radio<br />
Oncologie, DF, Mexico<br />
: : Non melanoma skin cancer is one<br />
<strong>of</strong> five causes <strong>of</strong> dead in men and women like the result <strong>of</strong> the<br />
epidemiological change in the world<br />
: To compare the local control in CPNM with superficial<br />
brachytherapy (BQT) <strong>of</strong> high dose rate (HDR) with Leipzig or mould.<br />
: Retrospective research in 98 patients with<br />
CPNM in head and neck area, treated only with BQT, superficial HDR,<br />
in the BQT Department <strong>of</strong> the Radiotherapy Service in Hospital<br />
General de Mexico from April 1 st 2005 to December 31 st 2011.<br />
Patients were divided into 5 nonhomogeneus groups (nose, eye, face,<br />
hand and ear). In the table 1 are the results <strong>of</strong> the different<br />
localizations and the type <strong>of</strong> applicator.<br />
In all the cases the prescribed dose was 5064cGy in <strong>12</strong> fractions, 3<br />
times a week (Monday, Wednesday and Friday) for 4 weeks. In the<br />
applicator's choice the type <strong>of</strong> surface was essential. In homogeneus<br />
surfaces, Leipzig applicators were used while in the inhomogeneus<br />
surface the mould applicator was chosen to guarantee the dose<br />
prescription.<br />
: It was found that in the 5 groups the local control is similar<br />
with the 2 types <strong>of</strong> applicators, except for the external ear canal in<br />
which the local failure is presented in up to 20%.<br />
Table 1. Caracteristics <strong>of</strong> the Group in the differents areas <strong>of</strong><br />
treatment. Hospital General de Mexico from April 1st 2005 to<br />
December 31st 2011<br />
Baso: Basocelular carcinoma, Squam: Squamous carcinoma. * The time<br />
<strong>of</strong> follow are in months<br />
: In CPNM head and neck area local control is up to 95%<br />
with the superficial brachytherapy (BQT) use <strong>of</strong> high dose rate (HDR).<br />
The surface type must be taken into account in the applicators choice<br />
(Leipzig or mould). The late toxicity percentage (hypopigmentation)<br />
was lowest with Leipzig than with mould. Specially the follow <strong>of</strong> the<br />
patients it´s difficult for the age and the conditions <strong>of</strong> them, so we<br />
have problems with the follow in the time. The superficial BQT could<br />
be an option for the patients with CPNM in stages I and II, with good<br />
results in local control and cosmetic results.<br />
PO407<br />
CTGUIDED INTERSTITIAL HDRBRT FOR RECURRENT MALIGNANT<br />
GLIOMAS: FIFTEEN YEARS SINGLE INSTITUTE EXPERIENCE<br />
N. Tselis 1 , C. Kolotas 2 , G. Birn 3 , E. Archavlis 3 , G. Chatzikonstantinou 4 ,<br />
E. Zoga 4 , T. Papavasileiou 4 , B. Rogge 5 , D. Baltas 5 , N. Zamboglou 4<br />
1<br />
Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Offenbach am Main, Germany<br />
2<br />
Hirslanden Clinic, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Aarau, Switzerland<br />
3<br />
Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Department <strong>of</strong> Neurosurgery, Offenbach,<br />
Germany<br />
4<br />
Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Offenbach, Germany<br />
5<br />
Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics and<br />
Engineering, Offenbach, Germany<br />
<br />
To assess the efficacy <strong>of</strong> computed tomography<br />
(CT)guided interstitial highdoserate (HDR) <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> (BRT) in<br />
the local treatment <strong>of</strong> recurrent malignant gliomas.<br />
: Between January 1995 and December 20<strong>10</strong>,<br />
179 consecutive patients were treated for recurrent malignant<br />
gliomas located within previously irradiated volumes. Sixtyseven<br />
patients were female and 1<strong>12</strong> male. Of those, <strong>12</strong>6 patients had an<br />
initial diagnosis <strong>of</strong> glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and 53 a non<br />
glioblastoma histologic primary (13 astrocytoma grade II and 40<br />
astrocytoma grade III) which transformed into a higher grade glioma<br />
at recurrence. In all patients primary treatment consisted <strong>of</strong> surgery<br />
and postoperative external radiotherapy up to 60 Gy. Adjuvant<br />
chemotherapy was administered in 1<strong>10</strong> (61.4 %) patients.<br />
<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> was performed for inoperable recurrent disease with<br />
progression under palliative chemotherapy. The median implanted<br />
tumour volume was 49 cm 3 (2207 cm 3 ) for primary GBM (n=<strong>12</strong>6), 46<br />
cm 3 (<strong>10</strong>1<strong>10</strong> cm 3 ) for initial nonglioblastoma recurring as confirmed<br />
glioma grade IV (n= 25) and 29 cm 3 (6200 cm 3 ) for recurrences<br />
presented as astrocytoma grade III (n= 28). The interstitial HDRBRT<br />
was performed using CTguided catheter implantation under local<br />
anesthesia and delivered a median dose <strong>of</strong> 40 Gy at twicedaily<br />
fractions <strong>of</strong> 5.0 Gy to a CTbased planned volume.<br />
: After a median followup <strong>of</strong> 8.8 months, three (1.6 %)<br />
patients were alive. The median postBRT survival was 37.7 weeks for<br />
primary GBM, 42.5 weeks for initial nonglioblastoma recurring as<br />
glioma grade IV, and 46.1 weeks for astrocytoma grade III. The<br />
corresponding median survival from diagnosis was 82.4 weeks, 53.5<br />
months, and 54.8 months, respectively. Seven out <strong>of</strong> 179 (3.9 %)<br />
patients experienced symptomatic radiation necrosis and 3 (1.6 %)<br />
bacterial meningitis. In addition, there were 4 (2.2 %) cases <strong>of</strong><br />
intracerebral hemorrhages, one (0.5 %) <strong>of</strong> fatal extend. No other<br />
procedurerelated deaths occurred.<br />
: For patients with inoperable recurrences <strong>of</strong> malignant<br />
gliomas within previously irradiated volumes, CTguided interstitial<br />
HDRBRT is a feasible and effective additional palliative treatment<br />
option.<br />
PO408<br />
HIGH DOSE RATE 3DIMENSIONAL TOPOGRAPHIC APPLICATOR BRACHY<br />
THERAPY FOR SKIN CANCER ABOVE CLAVICLE: EARLY OUTCOMES<br />
S. Vyas 1 , R. Weinberg 2 , N. Thawani 1 , S. Mutyala 1<br />
1 Scott and White Healthcare, Radiation Oncology, Temple, USA<br />
2 Scott and White Healthcare, Radiation Physics, Temple, USA<br />
: Nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSC) accounts for<br />
nearly half <strong>of</strong> all cancers in the US with an estimated incidence <strong>of</strong> 2<br />
million new cases/year. Surgery is the treatment <strong>of</strong> choice for most<br />
sites. Radiation is recommended as frontline therapy for Head and<br />
Neck (HN) skin cancers which has poor functional and cosmetic<br />
outcomes after surgical excision with negative margins. External beam<br />
radiation leads to inaccurate dosimetry and non homogeneity<br />
secondary to skin surface complexity. <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> is the most<br />
conformal form <strong>of</strong> radiation. There are few reports in published<br />
literature for use <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy for skin cancers. We present our<br />
single institution experience for feasibility, acute toxicity and early<br />
outcomes <strong>of</strong> definitive treatment <strong>of</strong> skin cancers in the head and neck<br />
using 3dimensional Topographic Applicator <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> (3TAB).<br />
: Patients with localized, nonmetastatic,<br />
NMSC above clavicle were treated with customized thermoplastic<br />
masks molded to the skin contour and either H.A.M. (Mick Radio<br />
Nuclear Instruments, Inc.) or Freiburg flap (NucletronElekta)<br />
applicators in contact with the skin lesion(s). The number <strong>of</strong> catheters<br />
used depended on the size and location <strong>of</strong> the lesions, with a 0.51cm<br />
margin. The prescription dose was 40 Gy in 8 fractions <strong>of</strong> 5 Gy each,<br />
delivered twice a week, to a depth <strong>of</strong> approx 3mm from the skin<br />
surface. Dose calculations comprised <strong>of</strong> determining the volume<br />
receiving 90% (V90), <strong>10</strong>0% (V<strong>10</strong>0), and 135% (V135) <strong>of</strong> the prescribed<br />
dose. Treatment toxicity was recorded and graded by RTOG criteria.<br />
Patients were followed at two weeks posttreatment and then every 3<br />
months with evaluation <strong>of</strong> response to treatment as well as acute and<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 163<br />
late toxicities. Local and regional relapsefree survival was analysed<br />
after generation <strong>of</strong> Kaplan Meier curves.<br />
: A total <strong>of</strong> 81 lesions on 54 consecutive patients received 3<br />
TAB between July 20<strong>10</strong> to Dec 2011. The demographic and treatment<br />
parameters <strong>of</strong> the patients are shown in Table.<br />
PARAMETERS N=81<br />
value(%) mean median range<br />
SITE<br />
nose 26(32.1)<br />
cheek 19(23.5)<br />
ear 17(21)<br />
forehead 7(8.6)<br />
others<br />
HISTOLOGY<br />
<strong>12</strong>(14.8)<br />
basal 55(67.9)<br />
squamous 23(28.4)<br />
mixed 2(2.5)<br />
bowens<br />
STAGE<br />
1(1.2)<br />
I 68(84)<br />
II 13(16)<br />
VOL(CC)<br />
1.8 1.3 0.39.4<br />
# CATHETERS<br />
5 5 113<br />
V90 (%)<br />
70.1 83.7 38.6<strong>10</strong>0<br />
V135(%)<br />
2.3 0.2 0.0153<br />
Mean follow up was 19 weeks (median 13 weeks, range 064), and 78<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 81 lesions received the full treatment course. The complete<br />
response rate at last followup was 95%(77/81). Local failure was seen<br />
in 3.7%(3/81) and regional failure was seen in 1.2% <strong>of</strong> 81 lesions.<br />
Three patients with 7 lesions were lost to followup. The KM local<br />
relapsefree survival was 88.4% and locoregional relapsefree survival<br />
was 83.5% at 64 weeks. There were no Grade 3 or Grade 4 toxicity,<br />
49% patients had Grade 2 dermatitis and 51% had Grade 1 skin<br />
changes. There was complete resolution <strong>of</strong> skin toxicity by 3 months.<br />
One patient developed a persistent ulcer after subsequent biopsy for<br />
suspected recurrence.<br />
: 3TAB is feasible treatment for HN skin cancers, with<br />
low acute toxicity. Early outcomes show good local control and low<br />
long term toxicity, but longer follow up is warranted.<br />
PO409<br />
LOCAL EXCISION AND BRACHYTHERAPY FOR SPHINCTER PRESERVATION<br />
IN RECTAL CANCER: RESULTS ON A COHORT OF 70 PATIENTS<br />
L. Grimard 1 , H. Stern 2<br />
1<br />
The Ottawa Hospital Regional Cancer Centre, Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Radiotherapy, Ottawa, Canada<br />
2<br />
Montreal Jewish General Hospital, Department <strong>of</strong> Surgery, Montreal,<br />
Canada<br />
: From Nov 1991 to March 2011, 70 patients (Pts)<br />
were entered in a cohort combining local excision (LE), brachytherapy<br />
(Ir192), and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for Pts at higher risk<br />
<strong>of</strong> nodal disease. Long term results are presented.<br />
: Seven Pts could not be treated as planned: 4<br />
did not have a LE, and 3 did not have Ir192. There were 4 local<br />
recurrences (LR) in this subgroup and they are excluded from this<br />
analysis. There were 63 Pts treated as intended, 34 males and 29<br />
females. Their age ranged from 33 to 88 with a median <strong>of</strong> 70, and 25<br />
Pts (40%) were over 75 years old. There were 61 adenocarcinomas (18<br />
WD, 35 MD, 6 PD, 2 unknown), one melanoma, and one<br />
neuroendocrine carcinoma. Tumor was located in the rectum in 34 Pts<br />
and at the anorectal junction in 29 Pts. Ir 192 dose was 4550 Gy<br />
(Paris System) using single or double plane implant in the tumor bed<br />
and 20 Gy after EBRT. There were 21 T1, 33 T2, and 9 T3 Pts. Two <strong>of</strong><br />
the T3 Pts had M1 disease. Ir 192 was used alone in 21 T1, and 20 T2<br />
Pts. EBRT and Ir192 was used in 13 T2 and all T3 Pts. Chemotherapy<br />
was given with EBRT in 2 T2 and 7 T3 Pts.<br />
: Following LE, margins were negative (R0) in 16 T1, 18 T2, 1<br />
T3 and positive (R1) in 5 T1, 15 T2, and 8 T3 Pts. There were 14 LR,<br />
including one in the perirectal nodes: 4 T1 (19%), 8 T2 (24%), and 2 T3<br />
(22%) Pts. There was no increased risk for T1 and T2 <strong>of</strong> LR with<br />
regards to margins. There were 8 LR in the 34 R0 Pts (23%) and 4 LR in<br />
the 20 R1 Pts (20%). There were 6 salvage surgeries in 3 T1 and 2 T2<br />
Pts: three are NED at 3, 7, <strong>10</strong> years, one is alive with disease at 3<br />
years, and 2 died <strong>of</strong> metastatic disease. Two patients required a<br />
colostomy because <strong>of</strong> radionecrosis. Two patients had significant<br />
incontinence. There were 16 deaths from disease, including the two<br />
patients expected with Stage IV, and 7 died from other causes.<br />
: This approach is promising for frail and elderly Pts at<br />
high surgical risk for a major resection. Adjuvant Ir192 is a valid<br />
alternative to major resection in some Pts with positive margins after<br />
LE.<br />
PO4<strong>10</strong><br />
TRANSLATIONAL NEOADJUVANT HIGH DOSE RATE ENDORECTAL<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY FOR RECTAL ADENOCARCINOMA<br />
J. Herman 1 , J. Efron 2 , N. Azad 3 , E. Wick 2 , E. Shin 4 , I. Kamel 5 , A.<br />
Singh 6 , L. Diaz 3 , A. HackerPrietz 1 , S. Gearhart 2<br />
1 Johns Hopkins University, Radiation Oncology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />
2 Johns Hopkins University, Surgical Oncology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />
3 Johns Hopkins University, Medical Oncology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />
4 Johns Hopkins University, Gastroeterology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />
5 Johns Hopkins University, Radiology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />
6 Johns Hopkins University, Pathology, Baltimore MD, USA<br />
: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NCRT) is<br />
the standard <strong>of</strong> care for TxN<strong>12</strong>, T34N0, rectal adenocarcinoma.<br />
Previous studies have shown improved local control and reduced<br />
toxicity with NCRT compared to adjuvant therapy. NCRT consists <strong>of</strong><br />
approximately 56 weeks <strong>of</strong> external beam radiation with concurrent<br />
5Fluorouracil. Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) has been<br />
studied in attempt to further limit dosing and toxicity to surrounding<br />
normal tissue, but length <strong>of</strong> treatment does not differ. The addition<br />
<strong>of</strong> more aggressive chemotherapy to NCRT has increased acute<br />
toxicity rates, yet failed to improve response rates. Therefore a novel<br />
approach using high dose rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDREBT)<br />
given in 4 fractions (6.5Gy/day) on a pilot study was investigated.<br />
Preliminary results <strong>of</strong> the first seven patients on protocol were<br />
reviewed.<br />
: Cases <strong>of</strong> the first 7 patients enrolled on HDR<br />
EBT pilot study, who underwent surgical resection, were reviewed. All<br />
patients had tumors 28%. Out <strong>of</strong><br />
the 7 patients, 3 had node negative disease at resection, 2 patients<br />
had 1 positive node. All patients were margin negative and 6 had<br />
sphincter preserving surgery, (other patient chose to have APR due to<br />
age). 3 <strong>of</strong> 7 patients (43%) had a pathologic complete response (pCR)<br />
<strong>of</strong> their primary tumors. Toxicity assessments showed only 1 patient<br />
with grade 3 proctitis posttherapy, all others were grade 2 or less<br />
consisting <strong>of</strong> proctitis and pain that resolved following surgery.<br />
: HDREBT is a novel approach for rectal cancer that<br />
reduces neoadjuvant treatment length, allows pts to undergo<br />
resection sooner, and shows favorable tumor response<br />
radiographically, pathologically, and biochemically. Preliminary<br />
results appear encouraging to guide future studies and assist with<br />
determining the efficacy <strong>of</strong> this modality.<br />
PO411<br />
BRACHYTHERAPY WITH IODINE <strong>12</strong>5 OR RUTHENIUM <strong>10</strong>6 FOR<br />
TREATMENT OF CHOROIDAL MELANOMAS MEASURING 57 MM IN<br />
THICKNESS
S164 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
L. Tagliaferri 1 , D. Smaniotto 1 , M.A. Blasi 2 , M. Pagliara 2 , A. Villano 2 , E.<br />
Balestrazzi 2 , L. Azario 3 , S. Luzi 1 , V. Valentini 1<br />
1<br />
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Policlinico A. Gemelli,<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Rome, Italy<br />
2<br />
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Policlinico A. Gemelli,<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Ophthalmology, Rome, Italy<br />
3<br />
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Policlinico A. Gemelli,<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Physics, Rome, Italy<br />
: Plaque radiotherapy is one <strong>of</strong> the most common<br />
treatment modalities for uveal melanoma and the Collaborative<br />
Ocular Melanoma Study found no significant difference between<br />
enucleation and plaque radiotherapy with respect to patient survival.<br />
The main aim <strong>of</strong> this study is compare Iodine <strong>12</strong>5 (I<strong>12</strong>5) and<br />
Ruthenium <strong>10</strong>6 (Ru<strong>10</strong>6) plaque radiotherapy for uveal melanomas<br />
measuring 57 mm in thickness with regard to treatment<br />
complications and tumor control.<br />
: Each case was evaluated at the weekly<br />
multidisciplinary meeting with ophthalmologists, radiotherapists and<br />
medical physicists. Treatment planning was performed by physicists<br />
and validated by radiotherapists and ophthalmologists. For this<br />
analysis we selected from our database, Patients with tumor thickness<br />
<strong>of</strong> 57 mm presented between February 2007 and October 20<strong>10</strong> and<br />
treated with I<strong>12</strong>5 (group A) or RU<strong>10</strong>6 plaque +/ Transpupillary<br />
thermotherapy (group B) plaque. We always prescribed respectively a<br />
dose <strong>of</strong> 85 Gy (Group A) or <strong>10</strong>0 Gy (Group B) at tumor apex The<br />
clinical data were then analyzed with regard to four outcomes <strong>of</strong><br />
radiation maculopathy, enucleation, local tumor recurrence, and<br />
metastasis.<br />
: The patieents <strong>of</strong> group A are 14 pts and group B are <strong>12</strong> pts.<br />
Clinical and ultrasound data <strong>of</strong> group A and group B were as follow:<br />
mean age (67 vs 65 years, range 4282) , mean tumor thickness (6.43<br />
vs 5.34mm, range 5.06.9), mean tumor largest basal diameter (11.85<br />
vs 11.33mm, range 7.5314.40). Mean follow was 24.2 months (range<br />
14.338.7) in group A and 30.2 months (range 7.648.3) in group B .<br />
Treatment with I<strong>12</strong>5 resulted in higher rate <strong>of</strong> radiation maculopathy<br />
(14.3% vs 8.3% respectively), lower rate <strong>of</strong> enucleation (7.1% vs 8.3%<br />
respectively), lower rate <strong>of</strong> tumor recurrence (7.1% vs 8.3%<br />
respectively), and lower rate <strong>of</strong> metastasis (0% vs 25% respectively).<br />
The differences were not significant on univariate level (P > 0.05),<br />
except for metastasis rate. The mean interval between treatment and<br />
onset <strong>of</strong> metastatic disease was 30.5 months.<br />
: The management <strong>of</strong> choroidal melanoma with a<br />
thickness <strong>of</strong> 57 mm is controversial. Iodine seems to provide higher<br />
local tumor control, while Ruthenium induces less radiation<br />
complications. Although there are several limitations to our study, we<br />
found that I<strong>12</strong>5 represents a better option in these subgroup <strong>of</strong><br />
tumors, especially for preventing metastatic disease.<br />
PO4<strong>12</strong><br />
BRACHYTHERAPY OF THE ORBIT IN YOUNG CHILDREN<br />
W. Sauerwein 1 , C. Stannard 2 , E. Biewald 3 , L. Brualla 1 , L. Lüdemann 1 ,<br />
B. Timmermann 4 , N. Bornfeld 3 , A. Wittig 5<br />
1<br />
Universitätsklinikum Essen, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiotherapy, Essen,<br />
Germany<br />
2<br />
Groote Schuur Hospital and University <strong>of</strong> Cape Town, Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Radiation Oncology, Cape Town, South Africa<br />
3<br />
Universitätsklinikum Essen, Department <strong>of</strong> Ophthalmology, Essen,<br />
Germany<br />
4<br />
WPE gGmbH, Proton Therapy, Essen, Germany<br />
5<br />
University Hospital Marburg, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Marburg, Germany<br />
: The most common ocular tumor in the childhood<br />
is retinoblastoma. Uveal melanoma at this age is extremely rare. As<br />
the survival probability <strong>of</strong> patients drops dramatically if the tumor has<br />
invaded the sclera or the resection line <strong>of</strong> the optic nerve, or<br />
macroscopic tumor has invaded the orbit these patients are managed<br />
with radiotherapy to the orbit and (in the case <strong>of</strong> retinoblastoma)<br />
with systemic chemotherapy. External beam radiotherapy, although<br />
excellent in preventing a recurrence, interferes with growth <strong>of</strong> the<br />
orbital bones in children resulting in very poor cosmesis, thus<br />
requiring multiple surgical interventions. To avoid these<br />
complications, several techniques were used with the goal to irradiate<br />
the orbital contents, while shielding the bony orbit and eyelids.<br />
: From 1992 to 20<strong>10</strong> we saw 8 children (2 girls<br />
6 boys) in the age range from 1 to 8 years (mean 2.5 y), suffering from<br />
retinoblastoma (6 unilateral, 1 bilateral) and uveal melanoma with<br />
involvement <strong>of</strong> the orbit. In 1992, two cases were treated by HDR<br />
afterloading brachytherapy with Ir192 giving 2 daily fractions <strong>of</strong> 1.3 –<br />
2 Gy up to a total dose <strong>of</strong> 40 Gy. In 2005, one child was irradiated by<br />
protons (1 single field 4 x 2 Gy/week up to 50 Gy). Since 2007, five<br />
children received LDR brachytherapy using I<strong>12</strong>5 (technical details in<br />
Strahlenther. Onkol. 187, 322327, 2011). This treatment consists <strong>of</strong> 6<br />
trains <strong>of</strong> I<strong>12</strong>5 seeds placed around the periphery <strong>of</strong> the orbit, and a<br />
metal disc, loaded with seeds, placed beneath the eyelids.<br />
: In all cases a longterm local tumor control could be<br />
achieved. One child died 3 months after the treatment for rapidly<br />
progressive intracerebral metastases. The follow up for the other 7<br />
children is 219 years (mean 5 y). The children treated with HDR<br />
brachytherapy and proton radiotherapy had a very poor cosmetic<br />
outcome: In all <strong>of</strong> them a severe shrinking <strong>of</strong> the orbital socket and<br />
fibrosis <strong>of</strong> the lids requested plastic surgery. The bones <strong>of</strong> the mid<br />
face show an asymmetric growth, which however is less pronounced<br />
as it was in former cases irradiated by external photon beam<br />
radiotherapy. In contrast, the children after LDR brachytherapy have<br />
a normal and symmetric growing <strong>of</strong> the bones <strong>of</strong> the face. In all<br />
except one the ocular prosthesis can be worn without problems. The<br />
only patient, who may need plastic surgery in this group had a tumor<br />
infiltration <strong>of</strong> the lower lid, which had to be included in the target<br />
volume.<br />
: In the rare situation where in young children an<br />
irradiation <strong>of</strong> the orbit has to be performed, best cosmetic results and<br />
excellent tumor control can be achieved by LDR brachytherapy using<br />
I<strong>12</strong>5 implants. The irradiation should be designed in such a way as to<br />
reduce the dose to the eyelids and the growing orbit in children.<br />
External beam radiotherapy including proton irradiation should be<br />
avoided. HDR brachyterapy using Ir192 it also leads to an unfavorable<br />
dose distribution especially to the lids and cannot be recommended.<br />
PO413<br />
HDR BRACHYTHERAPY IN ADVANCED ESOPHAGEAL CANCER:<br />
IMPROVEMENT OF DYSPHAGIA IN A COHORT OF <strong>10</strong>8 PATIENTS<br />
M.L. Reisner 1 , R.Z. Grazziotin 2 , L. Morikawa 1 , H. Salmon 1 , A.A. Rosa 2 ,<br />
T.M. Carneiro 2 , I.M. Veras 2 , M.A. Ferreira 2 , C.M. Viegas 2 , C.M. Araujo 2<br />
1<br />
Clinicas Oncológicas Integradas, Radiation Oncology, Rio de Janeiro,<br />
Brazil<br />
2<br />
Instituto Nacional de CancerINCA, Radiation Oncology, Rio de<br />
Janeiro, Brazil<br />
: Most patients with esophageal cancer are<br />
inoperable at presentation and dysphagia is one <strong>of</strong> the main symptoms<br />
interfering with quality <strong>of</strong> life.<br />
The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to estimate the improvement in<br />
dysphagia and complication rate using HDR (highdoserate)<br />
brachytherapy.<br />
: Between August 1997 and July 2008, <strong>10</strong>8<br />
patients with advanced esophageal cancer underwent HDR<br />
brachytherapy with a total dose <strong>of</strong> 1500cGy in 3 fractions <strong>of</strong> 500cGy.<br />
Tumors located in upper esophagus were also eligible to<br />
brachytherapy. Tracheoesophagic fistula by bronchoscopy was<br />
considered an absolute contraindication. Dysphagia was graded as 0<br />
(absent), 1 (to solids), 2 semisolids, 3 liquids. The improvement after<br />
brachytherapy was measured in a scale <strong>of</strong> points: 1 point<br />
(improvement in 1 grade <strong>of</strong> dysfaghia) and 2 or 3 points (improvement<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2 or 3 grades, respectively).<br />
: After 8 weeks after brachytherapy, significant improvement<br />
in dysphagia was observed in 36 % <strong>of</strong> patients and 42% remained<br />
stable. An improvement <strong>of</strong> 1 point was observed in 21% patients, with<br />
an improvement <strong>of</strong> 2 and 3 points in <strong>10</strong>.5% and 4.7 % <strong>of</strong> patients,<br />
respectively.<br />
Complete clinical response by endoscopy was observed in 21%, greater<br />
than 50% response in 18%, less than 50% response in <strong>12</strong>% and disease<br />
progression in 47% <strong>of</strong> the patients.<br />
Overall, esophageal stenosis occurred in 39% <strong>of</strong> patients, bleeding in<br />
6%, and fistula in 7%. Esophageal dilatation was performed in 29% <strong>of</strong><br />
cases and prosthesis was implanted in 11%. Complications based on<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 165<br />
tumor location (upper, middle and lower esophagus) like stenosis<br />
were observed in 46.1%, 37.8% and 42.8% <strong>of</strong> patients, respectively.<br />
: <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> seems to be very effective in palliating<br />
dysphagia on those patients with esophageal advanced disease.<br />
Moreover, it is feasible even in upper esophagus.<br />
PO414<br />
A CASECONTROL STUDY OF PATIENTS WITH HEAD AND NECK<br />
SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA TREATED WITH PDR BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
A. Haddad 1 , D. Peiffert 1 , V. Harter 2 , J.F. Betala 2 , I. Buchheit 3 , P.<br />
Graff 1 , M. Lapeyre 4<br />
1<br />
Centre Alexis Vautrin, Department <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy, Vandoeuvreles<br />
Nancy, France<br />
2<br />
Centre Alexis Vautrin, Department <strong>of</strong> medical statistics,<br />
VandoeuvrelesNancy, France<br />
3<br />
Centre Alexis Vautrin, Department <strong>of</strong> physics, VandoeuvrelesNancy,<br />
France<br />
4<br />
Centre Jean Perrin, Department <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy, Clermont Ferrand,<br />
France<br />
: PDR brachytherapy combines the radiobiological<br />
benefits <strong>of</strong> lowdose rate delivery with the radioprotection and<br />
optimization advantages <strong>of</strong> HDR brachytherapy. Practice in our<br />
department has been progressively shifting away from continuous LDR<br />
Iridium 192 wires to PDR dose delivery. We set out to evaluate the local<br />
control and toxicity outcomes <strong>of</strong> this technique in patients with head<br />
and neck squamous cell carcinoma.<br />
: 36 consecutive head and neck patients<br />
treated with PDR brachytherapy were randomly matched to 72 control<br />
patients treated with LDR brachytherapy. Patients were excluded if<br />
they were previously irradiated to the same site. Patients were<br />
matched based on T stage (1/2 Vs 3/4), tumour site (oral cavity Vs<br />
oropharynx), and use <strong>of</strong> surgery and/or external beam radiotherapy as<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the management strategy. Local control and the incidence <strong>of</strong><br />
s<strong>of</strong>t tissue and osteonecrosis were retrospectively evaluated and<br />
compared between the two groups.<br />
: Baseline patient and tumour characteristics were well<br />
balanced between the two groups. Male to female ratio was 3:1, and<br />
mean age was 57 yrs. Oral cavity cancers predominated at 81%.<br />
Overall Tstage distribution was 46, 44, 6 and 3% for T1, 2, 3 and 4,<br />
respectively. 75% <strong>of</strong> patients received brachytherapy postoperatively,<br />
either alone or as a boost after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT),<br />
while 14% underwent curative EBRT followed by a brachytherapy<br />
boost and 11% were treated with brachytherapy exclusively. PDR<br />
patients received a slightly lower mean dose than LDR patients, but<br />
had a slightly higher rate <strong>of</strong> R0 resections. Median followup was 59<br />
and 30 months for LDR and PDR patients, respectively. 3yr actuarial<br />
local control rates were 97 and 94% for LDR and PDR patients,<br />
respectively. Crude rates <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t tissue and osteonecrosis were 33%<br />
and 22% for LDR and PDR, respectively, although KaplanMeier<br />
estimates at 3 yrs found that this difference was not statistically<br />
significant. Dose rate however was correlated with the incidence <strong>of</strong><br />
late necrosis for both groups: each increase <strong>of</strong> 1 cGy per hour (or per<br />
pulse) was associated with a 34% increase in the relative risk <strong>of</strong> such<br />
toxicity.<br />
: We conclude that PDR brachytherapy in head and neck<br />
squamous cell carcinoma yields comparable results to LDR treatment.<br />
However, the ability to prescribe the desired dose rate and to<br />
optimize the dose distribution may result in lower complication rates.<br />
Furthermore, this technique decreases the exposure risk to medical<br />
personnel, altogether making it the technique <strong>of</strong> choice in our<br />
department.<br />
PO415<br />
LOCAL CONTROL, SURVIVAL AND COMPLICATIONS OF SOFT TISSUE<br />
SARCOMAS TREATED WITH LOW OR HIGH DOSE RATE BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
A. Paul 1 , E. Melian 2 , M. Surucu 2 , M. Kwasny 3 , M. Shoup 4 , C. Godellas 4 ,<br />
D. Vandevender 4 , A. Sethi 2 , G. Aranha 4<br />
1<br />
Loyola University Medical Center and Rosalind Franklin University <strong>of</strong><br />
Medicine and Science, Radiation Oncology, <strong>May</strong>wood IL, USA<br />
2<br />
Loyola University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, <strong>May</strong>wood IL,<br />
USA<br />
3<br />
Northwestern University, Department <strong>of</strong> Preventive Medicine,<br />
Chicago IL, USA<br />
4 Loyola University Medical Center, Surgery, <strong>May</strong>wood IL, USA<br />
: S<strong>of</strong>t tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumors and<br />
radiation therapy has played a major role in their treatment. This<br />
retrospective analysis reviews the rates <strong>of</strong> local control, survival, and<br />
significant complications (acute and chronic) <strong>of</strong> patients who received<br />
low dose rate (LDR) or high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BRT) at<br />
our institution.<br />
: From 1993 to 2011, 33 adult (median age =<br />
58) patients with STS received LDR BRT (n= 9) or HDR (n = 24) as part<br />
<strong>of</strong> initial or salvage local treatment. All patients had radical excision<br />
with goal to remove tumor enbloc and simultaneous catheter<br />
placement. BRT was started 45 days post surgery. LDR was used from<br />
19932003 and HDR from 20042011. BRT was given with (18) or<br />
without (15) external beam radiation (EBRT). Doses for BRT alone<br />
were LDR 45 Gy or HDR 3437 Gy in <strong>10</strong> fractions given twice daily.<br />
When BRT was given with EBRT doses were LDR 1520 Gy over 4 days<br />
or HDR 13.620.4 Gy in 46 fractions given with 4550.4 Gy in 2528<br />
fractions EBRT. KaplanMeier estimates <strong>of</strong> local control (LC), overall<br />
survival (OS), and disease specific survival (DSS) are presented.<br />
Association between LC, acute severe complications (ASC;
S166 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
brachytherapy.<br />
: Regional recurrences following a full course<br />
<strong>of</strong> radiotherapy were resected by an external approach and plastic<br />
tubes were intraoperatively fixed to the surgical bed. The tubes were<br />
fixed in a grossly parallel direction to cover all the high risk areas <strong>of</strong><br />
the surgical bed, both on the tissues to irradiate, by reabsorbable<br />
stitches, and to the skin, by buttons and nylon. The irradiation started<br />
in the 3rd postoperative day. In cases with a previous dissection <strong>of</strong> the<br />
carotid to avoid the risk <strong>of</strong> a boost on the carotid wall we carefully<br />
checked the distance from the tubes by a postoperative contrast<br />
enhanced CT. The irradiation dose was 30 Gy in <strong>12</strong> fractions, 2.5 Gy<br />
each, twice a day, in 6 days. The nasal packing and the catheters<br />
were removed at the end <strong>of</strong> irradiation course. We calculated the<br />
overall and relapse free survival starting from the day <strong>of</strong> the<br />
procedure.<br />
: We enrolled 5 patients, 3 with a neck recurrence from a<br />
supraglottic SCC, 1 from a parotid dedifferentiated acinic cell<br />
carcinoma, 1 with a locoregional recurrence <strong>of</strong> hypopharyngeal SCC.<br />
All the cases with the exception <strong>of</strong> the hypopharygeal one, had<br />
already undergone a neck dissection. 3 cases had undergone primary<br />
surgery, the oher 2 (1 larynx and the hypopharynx) primary<br />
radiochemotherapy (70 Gy+ cis q21). In 3 cases, reconstructed by a<br />
microvascular free flap, the recurrence involved the skin. In 1 case a<br />
pectoralis major flap was raised to protect the carotid in a previously<br />
irradiated neck in which jugular vein, SCM muscle and spinal nerve<br />
had been sacrificed (Crile operation). Median follow up was 7 months.<br />
All the patients are still alive, 3 out <strong>of</strong> 5 with no evidence <strong>of</strong> disease.<br />
No significant acute and late morbidities were recorded.<br />
: Combination <strong>of</strong> extensive salvage surgery and<br />
perioperative brachytherapy seems to be an effective option for<br />
treating regional recurrences <strong>of</strong> head and neck malignancies. The<br />
great conformation <strong>of</strong> the dose <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy and the<br />
reconstructive surgery contribute to reduce morbidity. The main<br />
problem in this cases is to avoid boosts on the carotid wall while<br />
delivering an effective dose to the high risk area. For this aim both a<br />
rational catheter positioning and a careful dose painting maximally<br />
exploiting the possibilities <strong>of</strong>fered by the modern IMBRT are<br />
fundamental.<br />
PO417<br />
A PHASE I FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR HDR INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY<br />
USING 60CO FOR DIFFERENT SITES<br />
S. Basu 1 , A. Basu 1 , K. Ghosh 1 , S. Datta 1 , S. Mullick 1<br />
1<br />
R.G. Kar Medical College Medical College, Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Radiotherapy, Kolkata, India<br />
: 60 Co60 source with similar geometric and<br />
dosimetric properties to 192 Iridium are now available. We present our<br />
experience with 60 Co HDR remote afterloading brachytherapy in<br />
interstitial implants/ surface moulds for different sites.<br />
: Patients <strong>of</strong> different sites were accrued for this<br />
phase I study to test the clinical feasibility and safety. Those included<br />
in the study had been treated with radical brachytherapy or a boost<br />
after EBRT with flexible or rigid interstitial implants or surface<br />
moulds. They had flexible or rigid implants using plastic catheters or<br />
steel needles using a Syed template respectively under general<br />
anesthesia.Skin cancer patients had surface moulds using flexible<br />
catheters fixed on thermoplastic devices. All patients then received<br />
HDR brachytherapy with the Multisource remote afterloading machine<br />
using 60 Co sources (Eckert & Ziegler BEBIG GmbH, Germany) and CT<br />
based planning in the HDR Plus s<strong>of</strong>tware v2.6. Planning parameters<br />
mandated dose prescription to CTV. Initial response, local and distant<br />
failures and toxicity were assessed every monthly for the first 3<br />
months then two monthly.<br />
: From October 20<strong>10</strong> to December 2011, 31 patients <strong>of</strong><br />
carcinoma <strong>of</strong> different sites were treated at our centre with HDR<br />
brachytherapy with interstitial implants or surface moulds with or<br />
without EBRT. The diagnoses and the dose prescription are<br />
summarized in Table 1. Till January 20<strong>12</strong> only one prostate cancer<br />
patient amongst those treated had a bone metastasis, no other<br />
locoregional failures were observed. Amongst all the skin cancer<br />
patients and 50% <strong>of</strong> the s<strong>of</strong>t tissue sarcoma patients had acute G3 skin<br />
toxicities at the 3 rd or 4 th week which resolved by 2 months. The only<br />
breast cancer patient has slight telengectasia at the end <strong>of</strong> 1 year <strong>of</strong><br />
followup.<br />
: HDR brachytherapy interstitial implants or surface moulds<br />
using 60 Co sources for different sites is clinically feasible and safe with<br />
favourable short term response and toxicity. It is also a very viable<br />
option for economically strained regions as for the half life <strong>of</strong><br />
60<br />
Cobalt. A long term larger study based on different subsites is<br />
needed to draw a conclusion though.<br />
PO418<br />
HYPOFRACTIONATED ACCELERATED CTGUIDED INTERSTITIAL HIGH<br />
DOSERATE BRACHYTHERAPY FOR LIVER MALIGNANCIES<br />
N. Tselis 1 , G. Chatzikonstantinou 1 , C. Kolotas 2 , N. Milickovic 3 , D.<br />
Baltas 3 , B. Rogge 3 , N. Zamboglou 1<br />
1<br />
Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Offenbach am Main, Germany<br />
2<br />
Hirslanden Medical Center, Institute for Radiotherapy, Aarau,<br />
Switzerland<br />
3<br />
Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics and<br />
Engineering, Offenbach am Main, Germany<br />
: To report our results <strong>of</strong> computed tomography<br />
(CT)guided interstitial (IRT) highdoserate (HDR) brachytherapy<br />
(BRT) in the local treatment <strong>of</strong> inoperable primary and secondary liver<br />
malignancies.<br />
: Between 2000 and 2009, 31 patients<br />
underwent a total <strong>of</strong> 42 BRT procedures for 36 hepatic lesions<br />
exceeding 4 cm and located adjacent to the liver hilum and bile duct<br />
bifurcation. In all patients treatment was performed for progressive or<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 167<br />
locally recurrent disease after failure <strong>of</strong> previous antitumor<br />
therapies. Eight patients (26 %) received BRT for primary tumors<br />
(hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocellular<br />
carcinoma) and 23 (74 %) for metachronous metastatic disease. The<br />
median tumor volume was 99 cm 3 (range, 461348 cm 3 ). The median<br />
age was 64 years (range, 2785 years). The HDRBRT delivered a<br />
median total physical dose <strong>of</strong> 13.0 Gy (range, 7.032.0 Gy) in twice<br />
daily fractions <strong>of</strong> median 7.0 Gy (range, 4.0<strong>10</strong>.0 Gy) in 14 patients<br />
and in oncedaily fractions <strong>of</strong> median 8.0 Gy (range, 7.014.0 Gy) in 17<br />
patients.<br />
: The median followup was 13.3 months with an overall<br />
survival rate <strong>of</strong> 66 % at one year. The overall local control (LC) was 82<br />
% at one year, 57 % at two years and 57 % at three years. The LC rate<br />
for patients with metastatic lesions was 79 %, 59 % and 59 %, and for<br />
the subgroup with primary hepatic tumors 88 %, 50 % and 50 % at one,<br />
two and three years, respectively. Seven mild and two major adverse<br />
<strong>events</strong> occurred acute in 42 procedures with no procedurerelated<br />
deaths. Mild adverse <strong>events</strong> were pain, nausea, and vomiting and<br />
were treated symptomatically. The two severe <strong>events</strong> were<br />
intraabdominal hemorrhages following catheter removal requiring<br />
blood transfusions but no invasive intervention.<br />
: Our results confirm CTguided IRTHDRBRT to be an<br />
effective modality for the palliative treatment <strong>of</strong> inoperable liver<br />
malignancies unsuitable for thermal ablation.<br />
PO419<br />
INTRAOPERATIVE HIGH DOSE RATE INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY IN<br />
THE MANAGEMENT OF SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS<br />
L. Varela Cagetti 1 , A. Polo Rubio 1 , A. Montero Luis 1 , R. Hernanz de<br />
Lucas 1 , R. Colmenares 1 , D. Perez Aguilar 2 , I. Sanchez del Campo 2 , A.<br />
Ramos Aguerri 1<br />
1 Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Radiation Oncology, Madrid, Spain<br />
2 Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Orthopedic Surgery, Madrid, Spain<br />
: In a retrospective analysis we evaluated the<br />
Ramon y Cajal Hospital experience <strong>of</strong> locoregional control, survival,<br />
and complications <strong>of</strong> highdoserate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) for s<strong>of</strong>t<br />
tissue sarcomas (STS) <strong>of</strong> the extremities, delivered in combination<br />
with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and adjuvant<br />
chemotherapy.<br />
: Between 2007 and 2011, <strong>10</strong> patients with<br />
biopsy proven STS (primary or recurrent), were managed with<br />
conservation surgery (S) and intraoperative placement <strong>of</strong> plastic tubes<br />
(11 implants) for HDR adjuvant BT delivery followed by EBRT.<br />
<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> was performed with Ir192 High Dose Rate afterloader,<br />
<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> dose calculation was based on the spatial<br />
reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the implant from a CT image set. EBRT was<br />
administered at the end <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy, once the healing process<br />
was complete. The total dose <strong>of</strong> the combination <strong>of</strong> brachytherapy<br />
and EBRT was calculated using the linearquadratic formulation<br />
(EQD2). Chemotherapy was added in high grade tumors. Descriptive<br />
statistics were calculated. A dosimetric and volumetric analysis was<br />
performed. Survival analysis was performed according to the Kaplan<br />
Meier method.<br />
: Eleven implants were performed in ten patients. Median age<br />
was 30 y. (range 13 86). Median largest tumor diameter was 6 cm<br />
(range 219 cm). T stage was as follows: T1b, 4; T2a, 1; T2b, 6. Tumor<br />
grade: I, 2; II, 4; III, 5. R0 resection was achieved in 4 patients, R1 in<br />
6 patients and R2 in 1 patient. Median number <strong>of</strong> vectors was 8 (range<br />
3 11). Median interval between S and start <strong>of</strong> irradiation was <strong>12</strong><br />
days. Chemotherapy was administered in 5 patients.<br />
Dosimetric and volumetric analysis is shown in table 1.<br />
Median Range<br />
BT Physical dose 19.8 Gy 17.5 54.0 Gy<br />
BT Dose per fraction 3.4 Gy 3 6.5 Gy<br />
BT Number <strong>of</strong> fractions 6 5 <strong>12</strong><br />
BT EQD2 21 Gy 19.5 65 Gy<br />
EBRT Physical dose 46 Gy 45 46<br />
Total EQD2 65 Gy 62 67 Gy<br />
BT Reference volume 132 cc 38 271 cc<br />
BT V150 43.9 cc 13.6 81 cc<br />
BT V200 19.6 cc 6.0 37.0 cc<br />
Median followup was 18.5 months (range 3.6 40.6 months). Three<br />
year actuarial local relapse free survival (LRFS) was 88.8%. Local<br />
relapse occurred in one patient, nodal relapse occurred in one patient<br />
and distal relapses in three patients. In relation with the status<br />
disease, in our series we found 7 patients with NED (no evidence <strong>of</strong><br />
disease), 2 patients AWD (alive with disease) and 2 patients DOD<br />
(death <strong>of</strong> disease). Wound complication Grade 3 was observed in 36 %<br />
<strong>of</strong> patients.<br />
: The integration <strong>of</strong> HDRBT in the multidisciplinary<br />
management <strong>of</strong> STS is feasible in a General Hospital. It <strong>of</strong>fers<br />
excellent local tumour control with an acceptable rate <strong>of</strong><br />
complications. Further followup is required to confirm our long term<br />
results.<br />
PO420<br />
IMAGEGUIDED INTERSTITIAL HDRBRACHYTHERAPY IN THE LOCAL<br />
TREATMENT OF INTRATHORACIC MALIGNANCIES<br />
N. Tselis 1 , K. Ferentinos 1 , C. Kolotas 2 , J. Schirren 3 , D. Baltas 4 , H.<br />
Ackermann 5 , N. Zamboglou 1<br />
1<br />
Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology,<br />
Offenbach am Main, Germany<br />
2<br />
Hirslanden Medical Center, Institute for Radiotherapy, Aarau,<br />
Switzerland<br />
3<br />
Horst Schmidt Kliniken, Department <strong>of</strong> Thoracic Surgery, Wiesbaden,<br />
Germany<br />
4<br />
Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Physics and<br />
Engineering, Offenbach am Main, Germany<br />
5<br />
J.W. Goethe University <strong>of</strong> Frankfurt, Institute <strong>of</strong> Biostatistics,<br />
Frankfurt, Germany<br />
: Imageguided interstitial (IRT) brachytherapy<br />
(BRT) is an effective therapeutic option as part <strong>of</strong> a multimodal<br />
approach to the treatment <strong>of</strong> intrathoracic tumors. In this study we<br />
report our results <strong>of</strong> computed tomography (CT)guided IRT highdose<br />
rate (HDR) BRT in the local treatment <strong>of</strong> inoperable primary and<br />
secondary intrathoracic malignancies<br />
: Between January 1997 and December 20<strong>10</strong>,<br />
65 consecutive patients underwent a total <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong>2 interventional<br />
procedures for a total <strong>of</strong> 77 lesions. All patients were not surgical<br />
candidates and BRT was performed for progressive or locally recurrent<br />
disease after failure <strong>of</strong> previous antitumor therapies. Fortyfive<br />
patients received BRT for primary intrathoracic tumors and 20 for<br />
metastatic disease. Fortyfive patients were male and 20 female with<br />
a median age <strong>of</strong> 66 years (range, 2393 years). The median tumor<br />
volume was 160 cm 3 (range, 24633 cm 3 ). The IRTHDRBRT delivered a<br />
median dose <strong>of</strong> 25.0 Gy (range, <strong>10</strong>.035.0 Gy) in twicedaily fractions<br />
<strong>of</strong> 4.015.0 Gy in 30 patients, and a median dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong>.0 Gy (range,<br />
7.032.0 Gy) in oncedaily fractions <strong>of</strong> 4.020.0 Gy in 35 patients.<br />
: The median followup was 13 months (range, 149 months).<br />
The overall survival rate was 61 % at one year, 24 % at two years and 6<br />
% at three years. The overall local control (LC) rate was 87 % at one<br />
year, 83 % at two years and 78 % at three years. The LC rate for<br />
metastatic tumors was 95 %, 88 % and 88 %, and for primary<br />
intrathoracic cancers 84 %, 77 % and 73 % at one, two and three years,<br />
respectively. Pneumothoraces occurred in 8 % <strong>of</strong> interventional<br />
procedures, necessitating postprocedural drainage in one patient.<br />
: Our results confirm CTguided IRTHDRBRT to be an<br />
effective modality for the palliative treatment <strong>of</strong> inoperable<br />
intrathoracic malignancies
S168 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
Aalbers, A. OC066<br />
AbdahBortnyak, R. PO243<br />
AbuRustum, N.R. PO252<br />
Ackerman, S. OC136<br />
Ackermann, H. PO420, PO233<br />
Adamson, J. PO353, PO274, PO340, PO266<br />
Adolfsson, E. PO346<br />
Afsharpour, H. PO215, PD<strong>12</strong>0<br />
Aghamiri, S.M.R. PO348<br />
Agostinelli, S. PO280<br />
Aguero, E.G. OC134<br />
Aibe, N. PO166<br />
Akiyama, H. PO369, PO366<br />
Aladin, A.S. PO365<br />
Albert, M. PO349<br />
Albitskiy, I. PO187<br />
Alcalde, J. PO381, OC052<br />
Aldridge, S. PO287, PO197<br />
Alektiar, K. OC046, PO252<br />
Alexander, R. OC034<br />
Ali, M. PO251<br />
Alizadeh, M. PO182<br />
Allan, E. PO387<br />
Allen, C. PO260<br />
Allen, P. PD<strong>12</strong>7<br />
Alm Carlsson, G. PO346<br />
Almadori, G. PO416, PO403<br />
Alonzi, R. OC025<br />
AlQaisieh, B. OC1<strong>10</strong>, PO345<br />
Aluwini, S. PO193<br />
Alva, R.C. PO285<br />
Amado, A. PO221<br />
Amanie, J. OC071<br />
Amin, P. PO405<br />
Amit, A. PO243<br />
An, L. OC074<br />
Anand, V. OC076<br />
Anastasakos, B. PO386<br />
Andersen, C.E. OC069<br />
Anderson, C. OC081<br />
Andikyan, V. OC046<br />
Ando, K. PO263<br />
Andres, I. PO237<br />
Ankerhold, U. PO336<br />
Anscher, M. OC037<br />
Antonini, P. PO296<br />
Aoki, M. PO163<br />
Aoki, Y. PO250<br />
Apicelli, A.J. PO299<br />
Appadurai, I. PO257<br />
Apurba K, K. PO245<br />
Aranha, G. PO415<br />
Araujo, C. PO217, OC036, PO194<br />
Araujo, C.M. PO413<br />
Archambault, L. OC070<br />
Archavlis, E. PO407<br />
Arenas, M. PO240, PO237<br />
Arias, F. OC052<br />
Arika, T. PO366<br />
Aristu, J. PO381<br />
Arm, J. PO260<br />
Armour, E. PO402, OC034<br />
Armour, E.P. PO404<br />
Arnold, A.A. PO356<br />
Aronowitz, J.N. 146<br />
Arora, S. PO383<br />
Arribas, L. OC053<br />
Arrojo Alvarez, E. PO195<br />
Arthur, C. PO230, OC026<br />
Arthur, D. OC136, OC092, 8, OC132<br />
Arunachalam, K. PO329<br />
Asbell, S. OC074<br />
Ashenafi, M. PO334<br />
Ashida, S. PO207<br />
Ashikari, A. PO169, PO162<br />
Asín Felipe, G. PO214<br />
Aslay, I. PO307, PO300, PO294, PO400<br />
Assmann, W. PO397<br />
Astrahan, M.A. OC067<br />
Atsushi, N. PO190<br />
Aubin, S. PO224, OC038, PO354<br />
AubineauLanièce, I. 18<br />
Autorino, R. PO416, PO403<br />
Axente, M. OC037<br />
Azad, N. PO4<strong>10</strong>, PO404<br />
Azario, L. PO411<br />
Bachand, F. OC036<br />
Bader, M. PO397<br />
Baghani, H. PO348<br />
Bains, M.S. PO391<br />
Bajard, A. PO211<br />
Bajwa, H. PO251<br />
Bakacs, G. PO218<br />
Baker, S. PO387<br />
Bakker, C.J.G. PD119<br />
Balestrazzi, E. PO411<br />
Ballester, F. PO204, PO202, PO181, PO328<br />
Ballo, M. PD<strong>12</strong>4<br />
Balm, A.J.M. PD<strong>12</strong>5<br />
Baltas, D. PO420, PO418, PO233, PO407,<br />
OC143<br />
Balvert, M. PO352<br />
Bar – Deroma, R. PO243<br />
Barakat, R.R. PO252<br />
Barani, I. OC037<br />
Barney, B. PO239<br />
Barra, S. PO280<br />
Barret, E. PO154<br />
Basagni, L. PO325<br />
Basu, A. PO3<strong>10</strong>, PO417<br />
Basu, S. PO3<strong>10</strong>, PO417<br />
Batchelar, D. PO217, OC036, PO194<br />
Batel, V. PO360<br />
Battermann, J.J. PO165, PO148<br />
Bauman, G. PO219<br />
Baumann, A. PO302<br />
Baumann, A.S. OC055<br />
Bautista Hernandez Yicel, B.H.Y. PO406<br />
Bautista, C. PO240<br />
Beaney, R.B. PO197<br />
Beaufort, C. PO178<br />
Beaulieu, L. OC141, OC070, PO224, PO215,<br />
OC038, PO354, OC139, PO326<br />
Beavis, A.W. OC111<br />
Beddar, S. OC070<br />
Behera, M.K. PO376<br />
BeikiArdakani, A. PO401<br />
Beitsch, P. OC092<br />
Bel, A. PO205<br />
Belhomme, S. PO170<br />
BéliveauNadeau, D. PO164<br />
Bellini, A. PO280<br />
Ben Yosef, R. PO243<br />
Benda, R. OC136<br />
Benedict, S.H. PO341<br />
Benezery, K. PO388<br />
Bennion, N. OC132<br />
Benoit, R.M. PO159<br />
Berenguer, R. PO237<br />
Berger, D. OC083, OC135<br />
Beriwal, S. PO304, PD<strong>12</strong>8, OC045, OC073,<br />
PO159, PO236<br />
Berniger, A. PO243<br />
Bernik, A. PO175<br />
Bernstein, M. PO290<br />
Bertelsman, C. PO299<br />
Best, L. PO260<br />
Betala, J.F. PO414<br />
Bhagwat, M. OC086<br />
Bhora, F. PO385<br />
Biagioli, M.C. PO293, PO216, PO292<br />
Bieleda, G. PO315<br />
Biesta, J. PO248<br />
Biete, A. PO240<br />
Biewald, E. PO4<strong>12</strong><br />
Biggers, R. OC028<br />
Bijker, N. PO258<br />
Bijok, M. PO321<br />
Bilimagga, R. 59<br />
Billan, S. PO243<br />
Bilsky, M.H. PO390<br />
Birn, G. PO407<br />
Bisirtzoglou, D. PO386<br />
Blank, L. OC056<br />
Blasi, M.A. PO411<br />
Bloom, E. PD<strong>12</strong>4<br />
Bochner, B. OC046<br />
Bockelmann, G. PO335<br />
Bodner, W. PO303, PO316, PO234<br />
Boladeras Inglada, A.M. PO209<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 169<br />
Boland, P. OC046<br />
Bolla, M. PO180<br />
Boockvar, J.A. PO382<br />
Bornfeld, N. PO4<strong>12</strong><br />
Boroghani, E. PO348<br />
Borroni, M. OC078, PO270<br />
Borst, G.R. PD<strong>12</strong>5<br />
Bosch, E. PO311<br />
Bostwick, D. 14<br />
Bottomley, D. PO173<br />
Boudreau, C. PO164<br />
Bourque, A. OC139<br />
Bowes, D. PO217, PO194<br />
Bownes, P. OC1<strong>10</strong>, PO345<br />
Bozic, N. PO287<br />
<strong>Brachytherapy</strong> Working Group PO294<br />
Brackett, N.C. OC134<br />
Brader, P. PO271<br />
Brandão, F. OC089<br />
Bräutigam, E. OC131<br />
Brenner, D.J. PO157<br />
Broksch, R. PO232<br />
Brouste, V. OC041<br />
Brown, J. PD<strong>12</strong>7<br />
Brualla, L. PO361, PO4<strong>12</strong><br />
Bruno, T.L. PO228<br />
Brüske, N. PO232<br />
Bryant, L. OC025<br />
Buchheit, I. PO414, OC055<br />
Buckley, D.L. OC1<strong>10</strong><br />
Buhleier, T. PO233<br />
Bukhari, M. PO3<strong>12</strong><br />
Bullejos, J.A. PO269, PO186<br />
Bulsara, M. PO323<br />
Bumm, K. PO363<br />
Buono, E. PO325<br />
Burri, R.J. PO157<br />
Bus, S.J.E.A. PO265<br />
Bussu, F. PO416, PO403<br />
Byrski, E. PO313<br />
Cai, J. PO353, PO274, PO340, PO266<br />
Caley, A. PO257<br />
Calvo Crespo, P. PO320<br />
Camacho, C. PO296, PO295, PO291<br />
Cambeiro, M. PO381, OC052<br />
Came, D. PO213<br />
Campos, C. PO246<br />
Caputo, T. PO259<br />
Carey, B. OC1<strong>10</strong>, 2<br />
Carlsson Tedgren, A. PO346<br />
Carmona, V. PO220, PO296, PO295, PO291<br />
Carneiro, T.M. PO413<br />
Carney, M. PO359<br />
Carrara, M. OC078, PO270<br />
Carrascosa, M. OC053<br />
Carrizo, M.V. PO237<br />
Carvalho, A.L. PO360<br />
Carvalho, L. PO284, PO347, PO201<br />
Casale, M. PO325<br />
Castilho, L. PO2<strong>12</strong><br />
Castro Gómez, E. PO320<br />
Castro, C. PO201<br />
Cathelineau, X. PO154<br />
Cattani, F. PO319<br />
Caudrelier, J.M. 11<br />
Cavanaugh, S. OC136<br />
Cavatorta, C. OC078<br />
Celada, F. PO296, PO295, PO291<br />
Celada, F.J. PO220<br />
Cerrotta, A. PO270<br />
Cesaretti, J.A. PO157<br />
Chadwick, E. PO231, PO225, PO222, PO2<strong>10</strong><br />
Challacombe, B. PO197<br />
Champoudry, J. OC040, OC084<br />
Chan, E.K. PD<strong>12</strong>3<br />
Chand, M.E. PO388<br />
ChandFouche, M.E. PO183, PO192<br />
Chang, C. PO309<br />
Chao, K.S.C. PO383, PO382, PO259, PO157<br />
Chapman, K.L. PO199, PO272<br />
CharraBrunaud, C. PO302, <strong>10</strong>7<br />
Chatfield, M. PO174<br />
Chatzikonstantinou, G. PO418, PO407<br />
Chaudhari, P. PO262<br />
Chemin, A. PO170, OC041<br />
Chen, C.P. OC029<br />
Chen, P.Y. OC090<br />
Chen, T. PO317<br />
Chen, X.C. PO288<br />
Chen, Y. OC074<br />
Chi, D. OC046<br />
Chicata Sutmöller, V. PO214<br />
Chicata, V. OC052<br />
Chichel, A. PO198, PO315<br />
Chino, J. PO353, PO274, PO340, PO266,<br />
PO329<br />
Chiquita, S. PO358<br />
Chirico, L. PO325<br />
Chiu, J. PO390<br />
ChiuTsao, S.T. OC067<br />
Chng, N. PO213<br />
Cho, Y.B. OC085<br />
Choi, W. PO385<br />
Chopra, S. PO278<br />
Choudhury, A. PO230, OC026<br />
Chuong, M.D. PO216<br />
Chust, M.L. OC053<br />
CikowskaWozniak, E. PO267<br />
Cirino, E. PO161<br />
Coakley, F.V. 15<br />
Cohen, G. PD<strong>12</strong>2, PO200<br />
Cohen, G.N. PO391, PO390, PO379, OC032<br />
Cohn, E. OC028<br />
Colangione, S.P. PO319<br />
Collado, E. PO220, PO291<br />
Colmenares, R. PO419<br />
Colombo, A. PO282, PO185<br />
Comi, S. PO319<br />
Connery, C. PO385<br />
Conroy, R. PO173<br />
Consorti, R. PO218<br />
Corica, T. PO323<br />
Cormack, R. OC1<strong>12</strong>, OC086<br />
Cornell, D.C. PO356<br />
Cosentino, D. PO249<br />
Cosma, S. PO308<br />
Cosset, J.M. PO154<br />
Courdi, A. PO388<br />
Cox, B. OC031, PD<strong>12</strong>2, PO200, OC032<br />
Craciunescu, O. PO353, PO274, PO340, PO266,<br />
PO329<br />
Crandley, E. PO297, PO341<br />
Crehange, G. PO211<br />
Creutzberg, C.L. 130<br />
Croce, O. PO330<br />
Crook, J. PO217, OC036, 11<br />
Crook, J.M. PO194<br />
Cruz, A. PO293, PO216, PO292<br />
Cuaron, J. PD<strong>12</strong>2<br />
Cuartero, J. OC085<br />
Cuccoli, D. PO218<br />
Cunha, A. OC027<br />
Cunha, J.A.M. OC114, PO359<br />
Czyzew, B. PO306, PO321<br />
da Silva, M.G.C. PO246<br />
Dabkowski, M. PO306, PO321<br />
Dabrowski, T. PO313<br />
Dagnault, A. 11<br />
Damast, S. PO252<br />
Damato, A. PO305, OC1<strong>12</strong>, PO357, OC086<br />
D'Amico, R. PO282, PO185<br />
D'Amours, M. PO326<br />
Danielsen, S. OC144<br />
Datsenko, P. PO187<br />
Datta, S. PO3<strong>10</strong>, PO417<br />
Davidova, O.N. PO365<br />
Davila Fajardo, R. PO392<br />
De Brabandere, M. OC066<br />
de HaasKock, D. PD<strong>12</strong>0<br />
de Jong, I.J. PO148<br />
de la Vara, V. PO237<br />
De Leeuw, A. OC081, PO235, PD<strong>12</strong>8<br />
de Leeuw, H. PD119<br />
de Pooter, J. 18, OC065<br />
de Prez, L.A. OC065<br />
de Reijke, T. 17<br />
De Werd, L. 19<br />
Declich, F. PO282, PO185<br />
Dejean, C. PO192, PO183<br />
Deka, P. PO285
S170 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
Del Moral Ávila, R. PO186<br />
Del Moral, R. PO269<br />
Delannes, M. PO211, <strong>10</strong>3<br />
Delouya, G. PO164<br />
Demanes, D.J. PO191<br />
Demanes, J. PO289, OC024<br />
Dempsey, C. PO260, PO238<br />
den Hertog, D. PO327, PO352, OC077<br />
Deo, S.V.S. OC133<br />
Depiaggio, M. PO204, PO181, PO202<br />
Derrah, L. OC072, PO219<br />
Desai, P. PO259<br />
Desai, S. OC054, OC054<br />
Descat, E. PO170<br />
Descotes, J.L. PO180<br />
Deshpande, D.D. PO343<br />
Deshpande, S. OC076<br />
Despré, P. PO224<br />
Després, P. OC038, OC139, PO326<br />
Devic, S. OC113<br />
DeWees, T.A. PO299<br />
DeWerd, L. PO342, OC068, 93, 20<br />
Diallo, I. OC084<br />
Diaz, L. PO4<strong>10</strong>, PO404<br />
Dicker, A.P. PO199<br />
Dilworth, J. PO229<br />
Dimopoulos, J. 6<br />
Dinapoli, N. PO416, PO403<br />
Ding, K. PO297, PO341<br />
Dinkla, A.M. PO205<br />
Dixit, N. PO309<br />
Doggett, S. 11<br />
Doino, D. PO280<br />
Dokiya, T. PO158<br />
Dolinska, Z. PO384<br />
Domínguez Domínguez, M.A. PO214<br />
Donath, D. PO164<br />
Doyle, L.A. PO199, PO272<br />
Draghini, L. PO325<br />
D'Souza, D. OC072, PO219<br />
Du Plessis, F.C.P. PO380<br />
Dugal, R. PO349<br />
Dumas, I. OC040, OC084<br />
Dunnington, G.H. 98<br />
Durbin Johnson, B. PO281<br />
Dutta, S. PO376<br />
Dybek, D. PO313<br />
Dyk, P.T. PO299<br />
Dymnicka, M. PO315<br />
Dziecichowicz, A. PO313<br />
Eagle, A. PO339, PO268<br />
Eastham, J. OC031<br />
Ebara, T. PO206<br />
Ebert, M. PO184, PO184<br />
Efron, J. PO4<strong>10</strong>, PO404<br />
Egawa, S. PO163<br />
Egger, J. PO288<br />
Eidi, R. PO348<br />
Eifel, P. PD<strong>12</strong>7<br />
Einck, J. OC113<br />
Eito, C. PO214<br />
Elliot, P. PO230<br />
Elsaid, A. PO241<br />
EMBRACE Study Centers, E.M. OC043<br />
Engineer, R. PO278<br />
Eniu, D. PO374<br />
Erickson, B. 23<br />
Esquivel, C. PO152<br />
Evans, A. PO385<br />
Expósito Hernández, J. PO186<br />
Expósito, P. PO269<br />
Ezhgurova, Y. PO208<br />
Fahy, L. PO298<br />
Fallai, C. PO270<br />
Farrow, H. PO387<br />
Fathalizadeh, A. PO400<br />
Fayda, M. PO400<br />
Federico, M. OC043<br />
Ferentinos, K. PO420<br />
Fernandez, D.C. PO293, PO216, PO292<br />
Fernández, J. PO195<br />
Ferreira, M. PO286<br />
Ferreira, M.A. PO413<br />
Ferreira, U. PO2<strong>12</strong><br />
Ferrer González, F. PO209<br />
Feuillade, J. PO192, PO388<br />
Fidarova, E. OC083, <strong>10</strong>1<br />
Fietkau, R. OC088, PO177<br />
Figueira, A. PO360<br />
Filipowski, T. PO399, PO176<br />
Finger, P.T. OC067<br />
Fleckenstein, J. PO363<br />
Floquet, A. OC041<br />
Florea, L. PO374<br />
Flores, D. PO388<br />
Flower, E. PO350<br />
Flühs, D. PO361<br />
Fodor, C. PO319<br />
Fodor, J. OC087<br />
Fokdal, L. OC082, OC039, OC069<br />
Folkert, M.R. PO390, PO379<br />
Followill, D.S. OC067<br />
Forsythe, K. PO149<br />
Foster, W. PO224, PO354<br />
Franchisseur, E. PO330<br />
Frank, S. PO227<br />
Frank, S.J. PO228<br />
Franken, S. PO165<br />
Frantzeskou, K. PO257<br />
Freilich, J.M. PO293, PO292<br />
Fried, P. 11<br />
Frigerio, C. PO282, PO185<br />
Fu Jun, Z. PO372<br />
Fuentes Mariles Sonia, F.M.S. PO406<br />
Fulkerson, R. OC068<br />
Furmanchuk, L. PO279<br />
Furukawa, S. PO369<br />
Fyles, A. OC085<br />
Gabel, M. PO256<br />
Gademann, G. <strong>10</strong>0<br />
Gagea, M. PO227<br />
Gagne, N.L. PO355, PO378<br />
Gagne, S. PO349<br />
Gal, J. PO192, PO183, 138<br />
Galalae, R. PO232, OC024<br />
Galhardo, E. PO349<br />
Gambarini, G. OC078<br />
Gandhi, A.K. OC042, PO338<br />
Ganesh, K.M. PO247<br />
GarcíaFoncillas, J. PO381<br />
GarciaMora, M.C. PO295, PO220<br />
GarciaRamirez, J. PO276, PO299<br />
Gardner, G.J. PO252<br />
Gardner, S.J. PO199<br />
Garelli, S. PO280<br />
Garg, A. OC114<br />
Garg, M. PO303, PO234<br />
Garipagaoglu, M. PO307<br />
Garner, D. PO171<br />
Gar<strong>of</strong>alo, M. PO405<br />
Gauthier, M. PO388, PO183<br />
GazdicSantic, M. PO333<br />
Gaztanaga, M. PO217, OC036, PO194<br />
Gearhart, S. PO4<strong>10</strong>, PO404<br />
Geijsen, E. OC056<br />
Gentil Jiménez, M.A. PO186<br />
Gentil, M.A. PO269<br />
Ge<strong>org</strong>iou, E. PO337<br />
Gérard, J.P. 99, PO388, PO330<br />
Gerdes, H. PO379<br />
German Farfalli, G.F. PO377<br />
Gerst, S. OC046<br />
Gherardi, F. PO319<br />
Ghilezan, M. PO229<br />
Ghosh, J. OC054<br />
Ghosh, K. PO3<strong>10</strong>, PO417<br />
Ghosh, S. OC071<br />
Giannelli, F. PO280<br />
Gibbs, G. OC028<br />
Gifford, K. PD<strong>12</strong>4<br />
Gilmore, J. OC040, OC084<br />
Giraud, J.Y. PO180<br />
Godellas, C. PO415<br />
Godfrey, L. PO318<br />
Godley, A. PO394<br />
Goksel, E.O. PO307<br />
Goldberg, K. OC114<br />
Goldner, G. PO271<br />
Golub, S. PO187<br />
Gomes, M. PO284<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 171<br />
González Patiño, E. PO320<br />
González, H. PO195<br />
Goodman, K.A. PO379<br />
Gorissen, B. PO352, OC077<br />
Gorissen, B.L. PO327<br />
Gospodarowicz, M. <strong>10</strong>2<br />
Gottschalk, A. OC029<br />
Goulart, J. OC040, OC084<br />
Grabowski, S. PO405<br />
Graff, P. PO414<br />
Granero, D. PO328<br />
Graves, Y.J. PO322<br />
Grazziotin, R.Z. PO413<br />
Greene, T. PO318<br />
Greskovich, J. PO394<br />
Gribaudo, S. PO308<br />
Grigsby, P. PO276<br />
Grigsby, P.W. PO299<br />
Grimard, L. PO409<br />
Gruszczynska, E. PO306, PO321<br />
Guedea Edo, F. PO209<br />
Guerra, A.S. 18<br />
Guerrero Tejada, R. PO186<br />
Guerrero, R. PO269<br />
Gugic, J. PO261<br />
Guinot, J.L. OC053, 118<br />
Guirado, D. PO333<br />
Gulia, A. OC054<br />
Gupta, D. PO259<br />
Gupta, L. PO262<br />
Gupta, S. OC054, PO278<br />
Gustafson, G. PO229<br />
Gustafsson, H. PO346<br />
Gutiérrez Miguélez, C. PO209<br />
Guyon, F. OC041<br />
Hachem, S. PO330<br />
HackerPrietz, A. PO4<strong>10</strong>, PO402<br />
Haddad, A. PO414, OC055<br />
Haddock, M. PO239<br />
Haga, A. PO167<br />
Hagan, M.P. OC037<br />
Haider, I. PO251, PO3<strong>12</strong><br />
HaieMeder, C. OC040, OC083, OC084, <strong>10</strong>7, <strong>12</strong>, 1<br />
Hajage, D. PO154<br />
Hajdok, G. OC072<br />
Halperin, R. PO217<br />
Hamano, T. PO250<br />
Hamid, S. OC136<br />
Hammer, J. OC131<br />
Han, D. OC113<br />
Han, S.B. OC075<br />
Hanlon, A. PO405<br />
Hanna, L. PO257<br />
Hanna, N. PO405<br />
HannounLevi, J. 138<br />
HannounLevi, J.M. PO192, PO183<br />
Hansen, E.S. OC039<br />
Happersett, L. OC032<br />
Harper, J. PO334<br />
Harter, V. PO414<br />
Hawliczek, R. PO223<br />
Haworth, A. PO184, PO184<br />
Hayes, M. PO171<br />
Hayman, O. PO344, PO264, PO332<br />
Heidenreich, A. 80<br />
Hellebust, T.P. OC083<br />
Henkel, T. PO155<br />
Henrique, R. PO201<br />
Henry, A. OC1<strong>10</strong>, PO345, PO153<br />
Hepel, J.T. PO314<br />
Hering, E.R. PO380<br />
Herman, J. PO4<strong>10</strong><br />
Herman, J.M. PO404, PO402<br />
Hernanz de Lucas, R. PO419<br />
Herreros, A. PO240<br />
Hervieux, Y. PO164<br />
Hewitt, M. PO339, PO268<br />
Heysek, R.V. PO216<br />
Hiatt, J.R. PO314<br />
Hickman, A. PO257<br />
Hijazi, H. PO192, PO183<br />
Hildebrandt, G. OC088<br />
Hindson, B. PO178<br />
Hirashima, Y. PO250<br />
Hiratsuka, J. PO158<br />
Hissoiny, S. PO326<br />
Hobbs, R. PO402<br />
Hobbs, R.F. PO404<br />
Hodek, M. PO150<br />
Hoekstra, C. OC035<br />
H<strong>of</strong>fmann, A. PO352, PO327, OC077<br />
H<strong>of</strong>fstetter, S. PO302<br />
Hojo, H. PO189<br />
Hokland, S.B. OC082<br />
Holcomb, K. PO259<br />
Homola, L. PO151<br />
Honda, K. PO160<br />
Hong, L. PO303, PO316, PO234<br />
Horenblas, S. PO148<br />
Horiba, M. PO405<br />
Horowitz, D.P. PO157<br />
Horsfield, C.J. OC111<br />
Hoskin, P. PO173, OC025, PO153, 5<br />
Hosseini Daghigh, S.M. PO348<br />
Hosseinzadeh, K. OC045<br />
Houédé, N. PO170<br />
Houser, C. PO304, OC073, PO236<br />
Hruby, G. PO188, PO174<br />
Hsu, I. OC029, OC027<br />
Huang, M.W. PO398, PO396, PO393<br />
Hudej, R. PO175<br />
Hudson, E. PO257<br />
Huger, S. OC055<br />
Hughes, L. OC074<br />
Hughes, R. OC025<br />
Hunt, D. OC027, PO293, PO292<br />
Hürter, W. PO311<br />
Hussein, S. 11<br />
Ibbott, G. 93<br />
Iftimia, I. PO161<br />
Ilson, D.H. PO379<br />
Immerzeel, J. OC035<br />
Inaba, K. PO255<br />
Indrieri, P. PO249<br />
Ioannou, L. PO264, PO332<br />
Ishida, M. PO156<br />
Ishikawa, H. PO206<br />
Isohashi, F. PO179<br />
Italiani, M. PO325<br />
Itami, J. PO255<br />
Ito, Y. PO255<br />
Itoh, K. PO206<br />
Ivanov, S. PO187<br />
Iwata, T. PO166<br />
Jaberi, R. PO348<br />
Jackson, M. PO174<br />
Jagadesan, P. PO262<br />
Jain, A. PO385<br />
Jambhekar, N. OC054<br />
Jansen, E. OC056<br />
Jansen, P. PO193<br />
Janssen, T.G. PO265<br />
Janssens, G.O. OC051<br />
Jauns, C. PO193<br />
Javed, S. PO231, PO225, PO222, PO2<strong>10</strong><br />
Jelly, F. PO373<br />
Jennings, S. OC028<br />
Jenrette, J. PO334<br />
Jezioranski, J. PO401<br />
Jhingran, A. PD<strong>12</strong>7<br />
Jia, L.F. PO398<br />
Jiang, P. PO389, PO242, PO368<br />
Jiang, W. PO389, PO242, PO368<br />
Jiang, Y. PO389, PO371, PO370, PO368<br />
Jimenez, E. PO237<br />
Jiménez, I. PO195<br />
Johansen, M.J. PO227<br />
Jordan, K. PO219<br />
J<strong>org</strong>e, M. PO286<br />
Joseph, D. PO184<br />
Joseph, D.J. PO323, 9<br />
Julka, P.K. OC042, PO338, PO262, OC133<br />
Jurado, M. PO381<br />
JürgenliemkSchulz, I. 4, PO235, PD<strong>12</strong>8<br />
Juvekar, S. OC054<br />
Jyotirup, G. PO245<br />
Kaanders, J.H. OC051<br />
Kacso, G. PO374<br />
Kahmann, F. PO155<br />
KaidarPerson, O. PO243
S172 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
Kakimoto, N. PO369<br />
Kaldas, S. PO188<br />
Kallol, B. PO245<br />
Kalnick, S. PO316<br />
Kalnicki, S. PO303, PO290, PO234<br />
Kamada, T. PO263<br />
Kamel, I. PO4<strong>10</strong><br />
Kaminuma, T. PO206<br />
Kamoi, K. PO166<br />
Kamrava, M. PO289, PO191<br />
Kanao, K. PO156<br />
Kanehira, C. PO163<br />
Kanikowski, M. PO198, PO315<br />
Kannan, N. OC073, PO236<br />
Kannan, V. OC076<br />
Kano, M. PO366<br />
Kao, J. PO157<br />
Kaplan, S. PO273<br />
Kapur, T. PO305<br />
Kapur, T.K. PO288<br />
Karasawa, K. PO263<br />
Kariya, S. PO207, PO158<br />
Karlsson, L. PO362<br />
Kasamatsu, T. PO255<br />
Kasaova, L. PO364, PO150<br />
Kasch, K.U. PO155<br />
Kashiyama, S. PO156<br />
Kasler, M. OC087<br />
Katayama, M. PO156<br />
Kato, S. PO263<br />
Katoh, H. PO206<br />
Katsilieri, Z. OC143<br />
Katsilieris, I. PO386<br />
Kattevilder, R. OC035<br />
KauerDorner, D. OC135, 138<br />
Kaushik, G. PO245<br />
Kavanaugh, J. PO299<br />
Kawakami, N. PO2<strong>12</strong>, OC089<br />
Kawczynska, M. PO306, PO321<br />
Kazberuk, D.E. PO399<br />
Kefala, V. OC143<br />
Keisch, M. OC092<br />
Keisei, O. PO168<br />
Kemikler, G. PO300, PO400<br />
Kemp, J. PO301<br />
Kerkar, R. PO278<br />
Kerkmeijer, L. PO172<br />
Kertzscher, G. OC069<br />
Keshtgar, M. PO323<br />
Keyes, M. PD<strong>12</strong>3, PO171<br />
Khan, A. PO317<br />
Khuntia, D. 98<br />
Kido, M. PO163<br />
Kiess, A. PO252<br />
Kim, D. PO217<br />
Kim, H. PO304, OC073, PO236<br />
Kim, L. PO317<br />
Kim, Y. PO339, PO268<br />
Kimmig, B. PO232<br />
Kind, M. OC041<br />
Kirby, N. PO359<br />
Kirchheiner, K. PO271<br />
Kirisits, C. OC044, OC043, PO271, OC081, <strong>10</strong>8,<br />
<strong>10</strong>9, <strong>10</strong>7, 94<br />
Kirkels, W. PO193<br />
Kirsner, S. PD<strong>12</strong>4<br />
Kishi, K. PO203<br />
Kitagawa, R. PO250<br />
Kiyohara, H. PO263<br />
Kizir, A. PO400<br />
Klopp, A. PD<strong>12</strong>7<br />
Knaup, C. PO152<br />
Kobayashi, K. PO166<br />
Kobayashi, M. PO163<br />
Kobayashi, R. PO158<br />
Kobzda, J. PO267<br />
Kodani, N. PO166<br />
Koedooder, C. OC066, PO205, PO258, OC056<br />
Kohno, N. PO168<br />
Koike, N. PO162<br />
Koizumi, M. PO179, PO369<br />
Kolar, M. PO394<br />
KolkmanDeurloo, I. PO193<br />
Kollmeier, M. OC031, PD<strong>12</strong>2, OC032 PO200,<br />
PO252<br />
Kolotas, C. PO420, PO418, PO407<br />
Koning, C. OC056<br />
Konishi, K. PO179<br />
Koper, P. PO248<br />
Korbelik, J. PO171<br />
Koretsune, Y. PO366<br />
Kosenko, I. PO283, PO279<br />
Kostevich, G. PO279<br />
Kotzen, J.A. PO254<br />
Kouji, A. PO190<br />
Kouwenhoven, E. PO248<br />
Kovacs, A. OC086<br />
Kovacs, G. OC142, PO403, 138, OC135, 16<br />
Kozlovsky, D. PO208<br />
Kramer, N. OC074<br />
Kratochwil, A. PO271<br />
Krauss, D. PO229<br />
Kreppner, S. PO177<br />
Krishnamurthy, D. OC027<br />
Krol, G. PO390<br />
Kucucuk, H. PO307<br />
Kucucuk, S. PO300, PO400<br />
Kudchadker, R. PO227, PO228<br />
Kudzia, R. PO313<br />
Kuhel, W. PO383<br />
Kukielka, A. PO313<br />
Kulik, A. PO321<br />
Kumar, R. PO402<br />
Kunaprayoon, D. PO200<br />
Kunogi, H. PO189<br />
Kuo, H. PO303, PO290, PO316, PO234<br />
Kuroda, Y. PO255<br />
Kuruvilla, A. OC136<br />
Kuske & C. Quiet, R. OC136<br />
Kuske, R. 57, PO322<br />
Kuten, A. PO243<br />
Kutler, D. PO383<br />
KwakkelHuizenga, L. PO248<br />
Kwasny, M. PO415<br />
Labeck, W. OC131<br />
LaCouture, T. OC074<br />
Lacroix, F. PO354<br />
Lagier, J. PO388<br />
Laing, R. PO231<br />
Laing, R.W. PO225, PO222, PO2<strong>10</strong><br />
Lala, M. OC076<br />
Lan, L. PO340<br />
Landry, G. PO346, PD<strong>12</strong>0, OC140<br />
Langdal, I. OC144<br />
Langley, S. PO222, PO231, PO225, PO2<strong>10</strong><br />
Lapeyre, M. PO414<br />
Lapid, O. PO392<br />
Lapointe, V. PD<strong>12</strong>3<br />
Lapuz, C. PO238<br />
Larouche, R. PO164<br />
Lartigau, E. PO241<br />
Lasbareilles, O. PO170, OC041<br />
Laskar, S. OC054<br />
Lavallée, M.C. PO354<br />
Lazzari, R. PO319<br />
Le, Y. PO404, OC034<br />
Lecuona, K. PO380<br />
Lee, C. PO316<br />
Lee, L. PO275, OC047<br />
Lee, R. 97<br />
Lee, S. OC091<br />
Lefkopoulos, D. OC084<br />
Lencart, J. PO284, PO347<br />
Leonard, K.L. PO314<br />
Leonardi, M.C. PO319<br />
Leong, N. OC071<br />
Lettmaier, S. PO177<br />
Levenback, C. PD<strong>12</strong>7<br />
Lever, F.M. PD<strong>12</strong>6<br />
Levin, W. OC085<br />
Lewis, C. PO219<br />
Li, J. PO242<br />
Li, K. PO356<br />
Li, Y. PO375<br />
Li, Z. PO375<br />
Libby, B. PO297, PO341<br />
Licht, N. PO363<br />
Lim, J. PO281<br />
Lin, L. PO309<br />
Lin, L.E.I. PO370<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 173<br />
Lin, P.S. OC037<br />
Linares Galiana, I. PO186<br />
Linares, I. PO269<br />
Lindegaard, J. OC043, OC069, OC044, OC082,<br />
OC039, <strong>10</strong>7, 23<br />
Liney, G.P. OC111<br />
Lipman, D. OC051<br />
Lips, I.M. PD<strong>12</strong>6<br />
Lis, E. PO390<br />
Litvinova, T. PO279<br />
Liu, B. PO375<br />
Liu, C. OC075, PO242<br />
Liu, C.H.E.N. PO371<br />
Liu, D. PO226<br />
Liu, S.M. PO395, PO393<br />
Livsey, J. PO230<br />
Llacer, C. PO211<br />
Lliso, F. PO220, PO296, PO295, PO291<br />
Lo, T. PO161<br />
Loessl, K. 138<br />
Logue, J. PO230, PO173, OC026<br />
Lokesh, V. PO247<br />
Lomas, H. PO216<br />
Long, J.A. PO180<br />
LopezPicazo, J.M. OC052<br />
LopezYurda, M. PD<strong>12</strong>5<br />
Lorentz, W.C. PO191<br />
Lotfy, N. PO241<br />
Lotter, M. OC088, PO177<br />
Lovett, A. PO188<br />
Lowe, G. OC025<br />
Lowe, V. 3<br />
Lozhkov, A. PO365<br />
Lüdemann, L. PO4<strong>12</strong><br />
Ludwig, E. PO379<br />
Luis Aponte Tinao, L.A. PO377<br />
Lujan Castilla Pomponio, L.C.P.PO406<br />
Lukacko, P. PO384<br />
Luna Vega, V. PO320<br />
Lund, E. PO346<br />
Luo, C. PO349<br />
Lutgens, L. PD<strong>12</strong>0<br />
Luzi, S. PO411<br />
Lyczek, J. OC088<br />
Lyden, M. OC092<br />
Ma, Y.Q. OC075<br />
MacAulay, M. PO171<br />
Madan, R. OC133<br />
Madden, T. PO227<br />
Madersbacher, S. PO223<br />
Madon, E. PO308<br />
Mah, D. PO316<br />
Mahadevan, A. PO161<br />
Mahantshetty, U. PO278, PO343<br />
Mahdavi, D.R. PO244<br />
Mahdavi, S.R. PO348<br />
Maheshwari, A. PO278<br />
Major, T. OC088, OC087<br />
Makarewicz, R. PO267<br />
Makker, V. PO252<br />
Malik, J. PO230, PO173, OC026<br />
Malinen, E. OC083<br />
Manchul, L. OC085<br />
Mandall, P. PO230, OC026<br />
Mandell, P. PO173<br />
Mangiacotti, F.P. PO218<br />
Manigandan, D. OC042, PO338, PO262<br />
Mantz, C.A. PO322<br />
Marafioti, L. PO249<br />
Maranzano, E. PO325<br />
Marcela de la Torre, M.T. PO377<br />
Marcelino, G. PO221<br />
Marcie, S. PO388<br />
Marcié, S. PO330<br />
Maree, G.J. PO380<br />
Markiewicz, W. PO399<br />
Marolt, P. PO175<br />
Marques Vidal, P. PO221<br />
Marshall, I.R. OC134<br />
Martell, K. OC071<br />
Marthinsen, A.B.L. OC144<br />
Martin, A.G. PO224, OC038, PO354<br />
Martin, T. PO233<br />
Martínez Carrillo, M. PO186<br />
Martinez Cobo, R. PO196<br />
Martínez Pérez, E. PO209<br />
Martinez, A. PO229, OC024<br />
Martínez, M. PO269<br />
MartinezMonge, R. PO381, OC052, OC024<br />
Martini, M. PO218<br />
Martirosyan, K. PO227<br />
Mart<strong>of</strong>, A. PO341<br />
Martos, A. PO237<br />
Marussi, E. OC089<br />
Masar, M. PO384<br />
Masarykova, A. PO384<br />
Masayoshi, Y. PO190<br />
Masenga, D. PO308<br />
Mason, B. PD<strong>12</strong>4<br />
Mason, J. OC1<strong>10</strong>, PO345<br />
Masood, A. PO251, PO3<strong>12</strong><br />
Masood, U. PO3<strong>12</strong><br />
Mast, M. PO248<br />
Mathai, M. PO281<br />
Mathur, N. PO200<br />
Matos, J. PO201<br />
Matsui, H. PO206<br />
Mattiucci, G. PO416<br />
Matylevich, O. PO279<br />
Maurer, J. PO340, PO266<br />
Mavrichev, S. PO283<br />
Mavroidis, P. OC143, PO152<br />
<strong>May</strong>adev, J. PO281<br />
<strong>May</strong>ahara, H. PO255<br />
Mazeron, R. OC040, OC084<br />
McGovern, M. PO197<br />
McKenzie, M. PD<strong>12</strong>3<br />
McMahon, R. PO329<br />
Mehmood, T. PO3<strong>12</strong><br />
Mehta, K. PO303, PO316, PO234<br />
Mehta, K.J. PO290<br />
Meigooni, A. 93<br />
Meigooni, A.S. OC067<br />
Meijnen, P. PO205, PO258<br />
Meirelles, A. PO2<strong>12</strong><br />
Melchert, C. OC135<br />
Melhus, C.S. PO355, PO314<br />
Melian, E. PO415<br />
Melich Cerveira, J. PO221<br />
Méndez, L. PO195<br />
Mendiboure, J. PO170<br />
Mendonça, V. PO221, PO286<br />
Meng, N. OC075, PO368<br />
Meng, N.A. PO389, PO371, PO370<br />
Mercedes, Z. PO269<br />
Mesina, C. PO309<br />
Mhatre, R. OC076<br />
Mhlanga, S.H. PO254<br />
Miccichè, F. PO416, PO403<br />
Michael, A. PO2<strong>10</strong><br />
Michalska, M. PO267<br />
Micka, J. PO342, OC068<br />
Mikami, M. PO250<br />
Miki, K. PO163<br />
Miki, T. PO166<br />
Milenin, K. PO187<br />
Milette, M.P. PO217<br />
Milickovic, N. PO418, PO233, OC143<br />
Milosevic, M. OC085<br />
Minken, A. OC035<br />
Mirri, M.A. PO218<br />
Mitch, M. 93<br />
Mitchell, C.K. OC090<br />
Mitchell, D.M. PO147<br />
Miyake, S. PO160<br />
Miyakubo, M. PO206<br />
Moerland, M.A. OC066, PO235, PD119, PD<strong>12</strong>6,<br />
PO165<br />
Moeslein, F. PO405<br />
Mohamed Yoosuf, A.B. PO147<br />
Mohamed, S. OC044, OC081<br />
Mohammed, F. PO254<br />
Mohammed, N. OC024<br />
Moman, M.R. PO165, PO148<br />
Monajemi, T. PO226<br />
Monetti, U. PO308<br />
Monnin, D. PO170<br />
Monninkh<strong>of</strong>, E. PO172<br />
Monroe, A. OC028<br />
Montazeri, A. PO373
S174 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
Monteiro Grillo, I. PO221, PO286<br />
Montenero, G. PO377<br />
Montero Luis, A. PO419<br />
Montesdeoca, N. OC052<br />
Monti, C. PO2<strong>12</strong>, OC089<br />
Montoya Monterrubio Juan, M.M.J.<br />
PO406<br />
Morales, J.C. PO220, PO296, PO295, PO291<br />
Morcovescu, S. PD<strong>12</strong>1<br />
M<strong>org</strong>an, R. PO2<strong>10</strong><br />
M<strong>org</strong>ia, M. OC085<br />
Morice, P. OC040<br />
Morikawa, L. PO413<br />
Morota, M. PO255<br />
Morra, A. PO319<br />
Morrier, J. PO354<br />
Morris, J.W. PO171<br />
Morris, S.L. PO197<br />
Morris, W.J. PO213, PD<strong>12</strong>3<br />
Morton, J.F.M. PD<strong>12</strong>1<br />
Mosalaei, H. PO219<br />
Motwani, S. PO256<br />
Moumdjian, C. PO164<br />
Mourtada, F. OC067<br />
Moustakis, C. OC030<br />
Mower, H. PO161<br />
Mozerova, E.Y. PO365<br />
Muhammad, A. PO3<strong>12</strong><br />
Mukhopadyay, N. OC132<br />
Mulhall, J. PO200<br />
Mullick, S. PO417, PO3<strong>10</strong><br />
Mulligan, M. PO219<br />
Muñoz, M.J. PO237<br />
Munro, R. PO380<br />
Munsell, M.F. PO228<br />
Murakami, N. PO255<br />
Murakami, S. PO369<br />
Murata, K. PO206, PO168<br />
Murray, T. OC072, PO219, OC111<br />
Murrer, L. PD<strong>12</strong>0<br />
Murtha, A. OC071<br />
Muruganandham, M. PO339, PO268<br />
Mussano, A. PO308<br />
Mut, A. OC053<br />
Muti, M. PO325<br />
Mutyala, S. PO408<br />
Mynampati, D. PO303, PO234<br />
Naeem, M. PO287<br />
Nagar, Y. PO264, PO332<br />
Nahajowski, D. PO313<br />
Nakagawa, K. PO167<br />
Nakajima, Y. PO156<br />
Nakano, T. PO206, PO277, PO263<br />
Nakashiro, M. PO189<br />
Namidome, R. PO162<br />
Namitome, R. PO169<br />
Napier, E. PO147<br />
Napoli, J. PO318<br />
Napolitano, M.E. OC067<br />
Narra, V. PO317, PO256<br />
Nash, M. OC029<br />
Nassisi, D. PO308<br />
Natale, R. PO388<br />
Nath, R. OC067<br />
Naveen, T. PO247<br />
Nazarnejad, M. PO244<br />
Ndlovo, A. PO318<br />
Nedialkova, L. PO382, PO259<br />
Nelson, C. PD<strong>12</strong>4, PO256<br />
Nemeth, G. OC087<br />
Nesvacil, N. OC081<br />
Neto, F.J.M. PO246<br />
Nevelsky, A. PO243<br />
Newhouse, C. PO273<br />
Ng, J. PO157<br />
Niazi, I. PO251<br />
Nichols, E.M. PO405<br />
Nickers, P. PO241<br />
Nieh<strong>of</strong>f, P. OC135, PO153, 138<br />
Nielsen, S.K. OC069, OC082, OC039<br />
Niewald, M. PO363<br />
Niksa, M. PO399<br />
Niladri B, P. PO245<br />
Nishioka, A. PO207<br />
Nishiyama, T. PO169, PO162<br />
Nkiwane, K. OC043<br />
Noble, S. PO257<br />
Noda, S. PO277<br />
Noda, Y. PO203<br />
Nomden, C.N. PO235<br />
Noordanus, R. PO392<br />
Nori, D. OC091, PO383, PO382, PO259<br />
Novaes, P.E. PO246<br />
Nowik, W. PO399, PO176<br />
Nozomu, T. PO190<br />
Nuñez, A. PO237<br />
Nuver, T. OC035<br />
O'Brien, P. PO260, PO238<br />
O'Toole, M.M. PO147<br />
Obed, R.I. PO351<br />
Oberlander, A.S. OC084<br />
Ogata, T. PO179<br />
Ogawa, K. PO179, PO369<br />
Ogawa, Y. PO207<br />
Oguchi, M. PO250<br />
Oh, S. OC085<br />
Ohara, R. PO156<br />
Ohkubo, Y. PO263<br />
Ohno, T. PO277<br />
Ohri, N. PO272<br />
Oismueller, R. PO223<br />
Oka, T. PO160<br />
Okada, Y. PO168<br />
Okihara, K. PO166<br />
Okinaka, Y. PO168<br />
Okonogi, N. PO277<br />
Okuma, K. PO167<br />
Olarte, A. PO381, OC052<br />
Oldrini, S. OC055<br />
Olijve, G.H. PO265<br />
Oliveira, A. PO201<br />
Oliveira, J. PO201<br />
Oliveira, J.A.A. PO246<br />
on behalf <strong>of</strong> the TARGIT Trialists' Group,<br />
PO323<br />
Onoe, T. PO167<br />
Oorschot van, T. PO248<br />
Oosterveld, B.J. PO265<br />
Oral, E.N. PO400<br />
Orecchia, R. PO319<br />
Osian, A. OC091<br />
Ostler, P. OC025<br />
Ott, O.J. OC088<br />
Ouhib, Z. PO328<br />
Oyekunle, E.O. PO351<br />
Özbay, I. PO400, PO300<br />
Ozell, B. PO326<br />
Paas, L. PO311<br />
Pagliara, M. PO411<br />
Pahlajani, N. OC074<br />
Palacios Eito, A. PO196<br />
Palcic, B. PO171<br />
Palled, S. PO247<br />
Palloni, T. PO218<br />
Palmer, A. PO344, PO264, PO332<br />
Palmqvist, T. OC144<br />
Paludan, M. OC069<br />
Paludetti, G. PO416, PO403<br />
Paluska, P. PO364, PO150<br />
PancewiczJanczuk, B. PO399, PO176<br />
Pandha, H. PO2<strong>10</strong><br />
Pang, C.N. OC075<br />
Pannullo, S. PO382<br />
Panshin, G. PO187<br />
Pantelis, E. PO337<br />
Papagiannis, P. PO337, 117<br />
Papaioannou, S. PO233<br />
Papalla, K. PO386<br />
Papanikolaou, N. PO152<br />
Papavasileiou, T. PO407<br />
Parashar, B. PO383, PO382, PO259<br />
Park, S. PO289<br />
Parker, B. PO217<br />
Parker, K. PO257<br />
Parliament, M. OC071<br />
Patanjali, N. PO188, PO174<br />
Patel, R. PO405, 98<br />
Patil, N. OC072, PO219<br />
Patwe, P. OC076<br />
Paul, A. PO415<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 175<br />
Paul, E. PO178<br />
PaulsenHellebust, T. OC081<br />
Pavese, A. PO383<br />
Pavlov, A. PO187<br />
Pawlicki, T. OC115<br />
Peddada, A. OC028<br />
Pedersen, E.M. OC082, OC039<br />
Pedersen, J. OC071<br />
Pei, X. OC031, PD<strong>12</strong>2, PO200<br />
Peiffert, D. PO414, PO302, OC055<br />
Pellejero, S. PO214<br />
Peng, J. PO334<br />
Pera Fàbregas, J. PO209<br />
Pereira, A. PO284, PO347, PO201<br />
Perez Aguilar, D. PO419<br />
Pérez Calatayud, J. PO202<br />
Perez, C. 13<br />
Perez, G. PO188, PO174<br />
PerezCalatayud, J. PO204, PO181, PO328, <strong>10</strong>4<br />
PO220, PO296, PO295, PO291<br />
Perkova, H. PO151<br />
Perry, K. PD<strong>12</strong>1<br />
Pervez, N. OC071, 11<br />
Pesudo, C. OC053<br />
Petera, J. PO364, PO150<br />
Peters, M. OC033, PO165, PO148<br />
Petersen, I. PO239<br />
Petersen, L.K. OC039<br />
Petit, A. OC041<br />
Petric, P. OC083, PO261<br />
Petrucci, A. PO218<br />
Pickles, T. PD<strong>12</strong>3<br />
Piena, M. OC033<br />
Pierrat, N. PO154<br />
Pieters, B. PO392, OC056<br />
Pieters, B.R. PO205, PO258<br />
Pigge, C. PO339, PO268<br />
Pigneux, J. OC041<br />
Pignol, J. 11<br />
Pignoli, E. OC078, PO270<br />
Pike, T. PO342<br />
Pina, F. PO221<br />
Pino Sorroche, F. PO209<br />
Piro, F. PO249<br />
Pirraco, R. PO358, PO284, PO347<br />
Placa, F. PO282, PO185<br />
Plamondon, M. OC141<br />
Platta, C. 98<br />
Pobijakova, M. PO384<br />
Polgar, C. OC088, 138, OC087, 7<br />
Poli, M.E.R. PO331<br />
Politis, G. PO386<br />
Polizoi, B. PO386<br />
Poljanc, K. PO223<br />
Polo Rubio, A. PO419<br />
Pomeroy, M. PO298<br />
Pommier, P. PO211<br />
Pons, O. PO220<br />
Popert, R.B. PO197<br />
Potrebko, P. OC074<br />
Pötter, R. OC088, OC083, OC044, OC043,<br />
PO271, OC081, <strong>10</strong>8, <strong>10</strong>9, <strong>10</strong>7, 23, 21<br />
Pouliot, J. OC114, PO359, OC027<br />
Praag, J. PO193<br />
Prada, P.J. PO195<br />
Pramod, K.P.R. PO247<br />
Prefontaine, M. OC072<br />
Prestidge, B. OC136<br />
Price, M. PO301<br />
Pugh, T.J. PO228, PO227<br />
Pule, L. PO254<br />
Puri, A. OC054<br />
Putz, E. OC131<br />
Qiu, H. PO404<br />
Qu, A.N.G. PO371<br />
Quiet, C.A. PO322<br />
Quispe Santibáñez, K. PO209<br />
Quon, H. PO402<br />
Rahnema, S. OC134<br />
Rajagopalan, M.S. OC045, OC073<br />
Rajapakshe, R. PO217<br />
Ramirez, P. PD<strong>12</strong>7<br />
Ramos Aguerri, A. PO419<br />
Ran, W. PO371, PO370, PO242, PO368<br />
Rangeard, L. OC055<br />
Rasch, C.R.N. PD<strong>12</strong>5<br />
Rasheed, A. PO3<strong>12</strong><br />
Rasoda, R. PO213<br />
Rath, G.K. OC042, PO338, PO262, OC133,<br />
PO376<br />
Rauchenwald, M. PO223<br />
Ravi, A. OC091<br />
Rayment, R. PO257<br />
Read, P.W. PO341<br />
Reardon, K.A. PO297, PO341<br />
Reerink, O. PD<strong>12</strong>6<br />
Refaat, T. PO241<br />
Rehman, K. PO251<br />
Reis, L. PO2<strong>12</strong><br />
Reis, T. PO360<br />
Reisner, M.L. PO413<br />
Rekhi, B. OC054<br />
Reniers, B. PO346, PD<strong>12</strong>0, OC140<br />
Resch, A. OC135<br />
Rey, F. PO309<br />
Reynolds, H. PO184<br />
Ribeiro Nuno Ramos, T. PO331<br />
Richard, S. PO363<br />
Richardson, S. PO276, OC115<br />
Richart Sancho, J. PO181<br />
Richart, J. PO204, PO202, PO328<br />
Richaud, P. PO170<br />
Richetto, V. PO308<br />
Ricke, J. <strong>10</strong>0<br />
Rico Osés, M. PO214<br />
Rigante, M. PO416, PO403<br />
Rijnders, A. OC066, PO153<br />
Rimner, A. PO391<br />
Rios, I. PO240<br />
Rishi Kartik, S. PO285<br />
Rivard and C.S. Melhus, M.J. OC067<br />
Rivard, M.J. PO355, PO314, PO378, 94, 93, 20<br />
Rivin del Campo, E. PO196<br />
Roach III, M. OC114, OC029<br />
Rodríguez Villalba, S. PO202<br />
Rodríguez, M.S. PO296<br />
Rodriguez, S. PO204, PO181, PO295, PO291<br />
RodriguezRuiz, M. PO381, OC052<br />
Roesink, J.M. PO235<br />
Rogers and R.M. Thomson, D.W.O.<br />
OC067<br />
Rogge, B. PO418, PO407<br />
Rohant, N. PO318<br />
Røhl, L. OC082<br />
Røhl, L.L. OC039<br />
Rojas, A. OC025<br />
Roldán Arjona, J.M. PO196<br />
Roldán, S. PO220, PO296, PO295, PO291<br />
Rolfingsmeier, J. PO299<br />
Romera, I. PO240<br />
Romero, P. PO214<br />
Rosa, A.A. PO413<br />
Rosa, C.C. PO358<br />
Rosenblatt, E. <strong>10</strong>1, 64<br />
Rosenstein, M. PO316<br />
Rosenzweig, K.E. PO391<br />
Roth, A. OC135<br />
Rovirosa, A. PO240<br />
Rozet, F. PO154<br />
Ruebe, C. PO363<br />
Ruesga Vazquez Daniel, R.V.D. PO406<br />
RuizArrebola, S. PO333<br />
Sabater, S. PO237<br />
Sabbas, A.M. PO382<br />
Sacco, S. PO282, PO185<br />
Sadeghi, A.G. PO322<br />
Saglam, E.K. PO400<br />
Saini, A.S. PO293, PO216, PO292<br />
Saito, S. PO169, PO162<br />
Sakelliou, L. PO337<br />
Sakumi, A. PO167<br />
Salcudean, S. PO213<br />
Salembier, C. PO153<br />
Salgado, L. PO284, PO347<br />
Salmon, H. PO413<br />
Salvador Garrido, N. PO320<br />
Salvajoli, J.V. PO246<br />
San Julián, M. PO381<br />
San Miguel, I. PO381, OC052<br />
Sanchez del Campo, I. PO419
S176 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
Sánchez Mazón, J. PO340, PO329<br />
Sander, T. 18<br />
Sandhu, J. OC046<br />
Sandler, H. OC027<br />
Sangalli, G. PO282, PO185<br />
Santos Ortega, M. PO202<br />
Santos, M. PO204, OC053, PO181<br />
Sardi Mabel, S.M. PO377<br />
Sasai, K. PO189<br />
Sathiyan, S. PO247<br />
Sato, M. PO203<br />
Sato, T. PO158<br />
Sauerwein, W. PO361, PO4<strong>12</strong>, 11<br />
Saunders, C. PO323<br />
Sazzad Manir, K. PO245<br />
Scala, L.M. PO200, OC046<br />
Scala, M. OC032<br />
Scanderbeg, D. PO322, OC115, OC113<br />
Scardino, P. OC031<br />
Scepanovic, D. PO384<br />
Schaeken, B. OC066<br />
Schäfer, C. PO397<br />
Schattner, M.A. PO379<br />
Schindel, J. PO339, PO268<br />
Schirra, J. PO397<br />
Schirren, J. PO420<br />
Schlaefer, A. 16<br />
Schleicher, U. PO311<br />
Schmid, M. PO271<br />
Schmidt, E. PO305<br />
Schmidt, M. OC036<br />
Schneider, B.F. PO297<br />
Schneider, M.H. PO363<br />
Schneider, T. PO336, 18<br />
Schwartz, T.H. PO382<br />
Schwarz, J.K. PO299<br />
Scoz, M.C. OC089<br />
Seevinck, P.R. PD119<br />
Seewald, D.H. OC131<br />
Segedin, B. PO261<br />
Sekine, H. PO158<br />
Selbach, H.J. 18<br />
Sempau, J. PO361<br />
Sengoz, M. PO307<br />
Senkesen, O. PO307<br />
Serarslan, B. PO400<br />
Sereni, M. PO218<br />
ServagiVernat, S. PO211<br />
Sethi, A. PO415<br />
Sgouros, G. PO404<br />
Sha, S. OC136<br />
Shah, C. PO229, OC090, OC024, OC092<br />
Shah, M. PO3<strong>12</strong><br />
Sharabura, T.M. PO365<br />
Sharma, A. PO376<br />
Sharma, D.N. OC042, PO338, PO262, OC133<br />
Sharma, N. PO405<br />
Sharma, S. OC042, PO285, PO338, PO262,<br />
OC133<br />
Sharma, S.C. PO376<br />
Shi, J. PO293, PO292<br />
Shi, Y. PO398, PO393<br />
Shimizutani, K. PO369<br />
Shin, E. PO4<strong>10</strong><br />
Shinohara, K. OC029<br />
Shirai, S. PO203<br />
Shiraishi, K. PO167<br />
Shoup, M. PO415<br />
Showalter, T.N. PO199, PO272<br />
Shrivastava, S.K. PO278<br />
Shrivatava, S.K. PO343<br />
Shuin, T. PO207<br />
Shukla, N.K. OC133<br />
Shuryak, I. PO157<br />
Shyamal K, S. PO245<br />
Shylashree, S. PO278<br />
Siauw, T. OC114<br />
Siebert, F. OC142<br />
Siebert, F.A. PO232, PO335, PO153, 94, 20<br />
Simancas, F. PO333<br />
Simeonov, A. PO401<br />
Simões, F. PO2<strong>12</strong><br />
Singh, A. PO4<strong>10</strong><br />
Sioshansi, S. PO314<br />
Sirak, I. PO364, PO150<br />
Sison, C. OC091<br />
Skowronek, J. PO198, PO315<br />
Slobina, E. PO208<br />
Sloboda, R. PO226<br />
Small Jr, W. PO241<br />
Smaniotto, D. PO411<br />
Smith, R.P. PO159<br />
Snee, M. PO373<br />
Snyder, M.B. PO322<br />
Soares, A. PO201<br />
Sola Galarza, A. PO214<br />
Solc, J. PO336<br />
Soldini, P. PO218<br />
Soler, P. OC053<br />
Soliman, P. PD<strong>12</strong>7<br />
Somay, C. PO223<br />
Song, D. OC034<br />
Song, T.L. PO396<br />
Song, W. OC113<br />
Song, X. PO375<br />
Sonoda, Y. OC046<br />
Sonomura, T. PO203<br />
Soroka, A. PO208<br />
Soumarova, R. PO151<br />
Spadinger, I. PO213, PD<strong>12</strong>3<br />
Spiegl, K.J. OC131<br />
Spratt, D.E. OC032<br />
Sroka, R. PO397<br />
Stafford, J. PO227<br />
Stam, T. PO248<br />
Stannard, C. PO4<strong>12</strong>, PO380<br />
Stas, N. PO324<br />
Stathakis, S. PO152<br />
Stauffer, P. PO329<br />
Steenbergen, F. OC077<br />
Steffey, B. PO353, PO274, PO340, PO266,<br />
PO329<br />
Steinberg, M. PO289<br />
Stephens, T. PO157<br />
Stern, H. PO409<br />
Stern, R. PO281<br />
Steuten, L. OC033<br />
Stief, C. PO397<br />
Stieg, P. PO382<br />
Stillie, A. PO253<br />
Stock, R.G. PO149<br />
Stockman, T. PO339, PO268<br />
Stoeckle, E. OC041<br />
Stoianovici, D. OC114<br />
Stojkovski, I. <strong>10</strong>1<br />
Straney, M. PO147<br />
Straube, W. OC027<br />
Strnad, V. OC088, PO177, 138<br />
Stump, K. 93<br />
Sturdza, A. PO271<br />
Sturza, A. <strong>10</strong>7<br />
Suárez Charneco, A. PO186<br />
Suárez Novo, J.F. PO209<br />
Subramani, V. PO338<br />
Sugawara, A. PO156<br />
Sugimoto, A. OC072<br />
Sulyok, Z. OC087<br />
Sumi, M. PO255<br />
Sun Myint, A. PO373<br />
Sun, B. PO299, PO276<br />
Sun, Y. PO395<br />
Sundset, M. OC144<br />
Surry, K. OC072<br />
Surucu, M. PO415<br />
Suslova, V. PO283<br />
Suzuki, K. PO206<br />
Svoboda, A. PO149<br />
Swamidas, J. PO343<br />
Swanson, D.A. PO228, PO227<br />
Swapnendu, B. PO245<br />
Swindell, R. PO230, PO173, OC026<br />
SzmigielTrzcinska, A. PO399, PO176<br />
Taboada Valladares, B. PO320<br />
Taccini, G. PO280<br />
Tadahiko, K. PO190<br />
Tagliaferri, L. PO416, PO411, PO403<br />
Tailleur, A. OC040<br />
TakacsiNagy, Z. OC087<br />
Takahashi, A. PO162<br />
Takahashi, K. PO255<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong> S 177<br />
Takahashi, Y. PO179<br />
Takaki, S. PO163<br />
Takenaka, T. PO160, PO366<br />
Takes, R.P. OC051<br />
Takizawa, K. PO250<br />
Tan, I.B. PD<strong>12</strong>5<br />
Tanaka, E. PO160, PO366<br />
Tanderup, K. OC083, OC069, OC044, OC043,<br />
OC081, OC082, OC039, <strong>10</strong>7, 23, 22<br />
Tanvirpasha, C.R. PO247<br />
Taussky, D. PO182, PO164<br />
Teliyants, A. PO187<br />
Tenconi, C. PO270<br />
Teo, K. PO309<br />
Terk, M. PO157<br />
Tersteeg, J.H.A. PO235<br />
Tessa, M. PO308<br />
Tezcanli, E.T. PO307<br />
Thames, H.D. OC131<br />
Thawani, N. PO408<br />
TherriaultProulx, F. OC070<br />
Thissen, B. OC066<br />
Thomadsen, B. 93<br />
Thomas, L. PO211, PO170, OC041<br />
Thullier, C. PO180<br />
Thwaites, D. OC1<strong>10</strong>, PO345<br />
Tian, S. PO370<br />
Timmermann, B. PO4<strong>12</strong><br />
Todor, D. OC132, OC037<br />
Toita, T. PO250<br />
TomaDasu, I. OC144<br />
Toni, M.P. 18<br />
TopczewskaBruns, J. PO176<br />
Tormo, A. PO220, PO296, PO295, PO291<br />
TorneroLópez, A. PO333<br />
Torresan, R. OC089<br />
Tortajada, M.I. OC053<br />
Tovar Martín, M.I. PO186<br />
Tovar, I. PO269<br />
Tovey, S. PO380<br />
Townamchai, K. PO357, OC086, PO275, PO273<br />
Toya, K. PO169, PO162<br />
Track, C. OC131<br />
Tran, A. PO230<br />
Trauernicht, C.J. PO380<br />
Trichter, S. PO383<br />
Trigo, L. PO284, PO347, PO201<br />
Trombetta, M. 11<br />
Tsalafoutas, I. PO386<br />
Tselis, N. PO420, PO418, PO233, PO407,<br />
OC143<br />
Tsubokura, T. PO166<br />
Tsukamoto, N. PO156<br />
Tsukiyama, I. PO158<br />
Tsung, R. PO197<br />
Ttian, S.Q. PO368<br />
Tunn, U.W. PO233<br />
Turbina, A.V. PO365<br />
Türker, M. PO311<br />
Ueda, M. PO160<br />
Uehara, S. PO158<br />
Ulhman, E. PO2<strong>12</strong><br />
Umayahara, K. PO250<br />
Untereiner, M. PO211<br />
Upasani, M. PO278<br />
Urgesi, A. PO308<br />
Usman, S. PO251<br />
Usmani, N. OC071<br />
Uter, W. OC088<br />
Uthamanthil, R. PO227<br />
Valduvieco, I. PO240<br />
Valentini, V. PO416, PO411, PO403<br />
Valicenti, R. PO281<br />
Vallancien, G. PO154<br />
van 't Riet, A. OC066<br />
van de Kar, M. OC056<br />
van de Pol, S. OC035<br />
van den Bos, W. PD<strong>12</strong>8<br />
van der Grient, J.N. PO205<br />
van der Heide, U.A. PO165<br />
van der Laarse, R. PO205<br />
van der Poel, H.G. PO148<br />
van der SteenBanasik, E.M. PO265<br />
van Deursen, M. PO165<br />
van Gils, F. OC140, PD<strong>12</strong>0<br />
Van Limbergen, E. 138<br />
van Os, R. PO392, OC056<br />
van Rooij, P. PO193<br />
van Vulpen, M. PO172, OC033, PD119, PD<strong>12</strong>6,<br />
PO165<br />
van Wieringen, N. PO205<br />
Vandevender, D. PO415<br />
Vanek, K. PO334<br />
Vanneste, B. OC040, PD<strong>12</strong>5<br />
Varela Cagetti, L. PO419<br />
Varfalvy, N. OC038, PO354<br />
Vargas Arrabal, M.P. PO186<br />
Vargas, P. PO269<br />
Vasconcelos, A. PO286<br />
Vavassori, A. PO319<br />
Vedda, A. OC078<br />
Velema, L. PD<strong>12</strong>8<br />
Venselaar, J. 93<br />
Venselaar, J.L.M. 20<br />
Ventura Bujalance, M. PO209<br />
Vera, R. OC132<br />
Veras, I.M. PO413<br />
Verghis, R. PO147<br />
Vergunst, H. PO148<br />
Verhaegen, F. PO215, PO346, PD<strong>12</strong>0, OC140<br />
Verhoef, L.C. OC051<br />
Verry, C. PO180<br />
Vicini, F.A. OC090, OC092<br />
Viegas, C.M. PO413<br />
Vigneault, E. PO224, OC038, OC038, PO354<br />
Vijande, J. PO328<br />
Vijverberg, P.L.M. PO148<br />
Vila Viñas, M. PO214<br />
Villafranca, E. PO214<br />
Villano, A. PO411<br />
VillavicencioQueijeiro, M. PO406<br />
Vinikovetskaya, A. PO187<br />
Visser, P. PD<strong>12</strong>0<br />
Viswanathan, A. PO305, OC1<strong>12</strong>, PO357, OC086,<br />
PO273, OC047, <strong>10</strong>6<br />
PO275, PO288<br />
Viterbo, T. PO284, PO347, PO201<br />
Vosmik, M. PO150<br />
Vulpen, M. PO148<br />
Vuong, T. OC113<br />
Vyas, S. PO408<br />
Vynckier, S. OC066<br />
Wakatsuki, M. PO277, PO263<br />
Wakil, G. PO154<br />
Wakumoto, Y. PO189<br />
Wallace, M. PO229, OC090<br />
Wanderås, A.D. OC144<br />
Wang, H. PO242, PO367<br />
Wang, J. PO191, PO389, PO371, PO242,<br />
PO367<br />
Wang, J.J. OC075, PO370, PO368<br />
Wang, T. PO402<br />
Wang, W. PO375<br />
Wang, Y. PO375<br />
Wang, Z. PO349<br />
Warden, M.J. PO318<br />
WarrenForward, H. PO260<br />
Wazer, D. OC136<br />
Wazer, D.E. PO314<br />
Webster, M. OC113<br />
Weinberg, R. PO408<br />
Weinberg, V. OC029<br />
Welch, S. OC072<br />
Wernicke, A.G. PO383, PO382, PO259<br />
Westendorp, R. OC035<br />
Whalley, D. PO174<br />
Whitaker, M. PO188<br />
White, S. PO346, OC140<br />
Whitsell, T. PD<strong>12</strong>4<br />
Whittaker, M. PO174<br />
Wick, E. PO4<strong>10</strong><br />
Wiebe, E. OC072<br />
Wild, A. PO402<br />
Wilder, R.B. PO216<br />
Wilkinson, A. PO394<br />
Wilkinson, J.B. OC090, OC092<br />
Williams, N. PO323<br />
Williams, S. PO344, PO184, PO184<br />
Williaume, D. PO211<br />
Wilson, D. OC1<strong>10</strong>
S178 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brachytherapy</strong> 20<strong>12</strong><br />
Winship, A. PO287<br />
With, A. PO362<br />
Wittig, A. PO361, PO4<strong>12</strong><br />
Wolf, S. OC142, PO335<br />
Wondergem, J. <strong>10</strong>1<br />
Wong, H. PO373<br />
Wong, R. PO401<br />
Wood, D. PO387<br />
Workman, G. PO147<br />
Wu, A. PO303, PO316, PO234<br />
Wu, A.J. PO391, PO379<br />
Wust, P. PO155<br />
Wylie, J. PO230, PO173, OC026<br />
Xie, J. OC085<br />
Xiong, L. PO161<br />
Yagi, Y. PO169, PO162<br />
Yamada, R. PO203<br />
Yamada, Y. OC031, PD<strong>12</strong>2, PO390, OC032<br />
Yamamoto, H. PO366<br />
Yamamoto, K. PO167<br />
Yamamoto, Y. PO163<br />
Yamasaki, I. PO207<br />
Yamazaki, H. PO166, PO369, PO160, PO366<br />
Yang, J. PO359<br />
Yang, R. PO389, PO371, PO370<br />
Yang, Y. PO355<br />
Yap, M.L. OC085<br />
Yaparpalvi, R. PO303, PO290, PO234<br />
Yashar, C. PO322<br />
Ye, H. PO229, OC024<br />
Yee, D. OC071<br />
Yilmaz, M. PO307<br />
Yoda, K. PO167<br />
Yondorf, M. PO259<br />
Yorozu, A. PO169, PO162<br />
Yoshida, K. PO162, PO369, PO160, PO366<br />
Yoshida, M. PO160, PO366<br />
Yoshimura, Y. PO160<br />
Yoshioka, Y. PO179, PO369<br />
Youssef, A. OC074<br />
Yu, G.Y. PO398, PO396<br />
Yu, Y.A.N. PO370<br />
Yuan, H. PO371, PO242<br />
Yuan, H.S. OC075<br />
Yue, J. PO317<br />
Zahra, M. PO253<br />
Zaider, M. PO390<br />
Zakikhani, R. PO349<br />
Zamboglou, N. PO420, PO418, PO233, PO407,<br />
OC143<br />
Zaragoza, F.J. PO361<br />
Zelefsky, M. OC031, PD<strong>12</strong>2<br />
Zelefsky, M.J. PO200, PO391, OC032<br />
Zettos, A. PO386<br />
Zhang, J. PO398, PO396, PO395, PO393<br />
Zhang, J.G. PO398, PO396, PO395, PO393<br />
Zhang, N. OC114, PO359<br />
Zhang, Z. PO200<br />
Zheng, L. PO398, PO396, PO395, PO393<br />
Zhu, L. PO274, PO371, PO242<br />
Zhu, Y. PO349<br />
Zhumabaeva, A.G. PO365<br />
Ziccarelli, L. PO249<br />
Ziccarelli, P. PO249<br />
Zilli, T. PO182<br />
Zimmermann, J. OC030<br />
Zimmermann, P. OC030<br />
Zoga, E. PO407<br />
ZolciakSiwinska, A. PO306<br />
Zouhar, M. PO150<br />
Zourari, K. PO337<br />
Zubizarreta, E.H. <strong>10</strong>1<br />
Zuchora, A. PO298<br />
Zuo, Y. OC114<br />
Zwierzchowski, G. PO315