03.06.2016 Views

Tomorrow's Railway and Climate Change Adaptation Final Report

2016-05-T1009-final-report

2016-05-T1009-final-report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

information would be a good starting point for managing lightning, although this would<br />

only address the hazard. The Met Office’s Hazard Manager product includes a layer<br />

which shows recent lightning observations. Other approaches may include improved<br />

procedures for locating <strong>and</strong> addressing lightning related failures.<br />

Excess rainfall <strong>and</strong> localised flooding causes serious problems to the GB railway network,<br />

<strong>and</strong> winter rainfall in particular is projected to increase in years to come. Therefore we<br />

need to be able to assess the observed <strong>and</strong> projected impacts now <strong>and</strong> in the future.<br />

These are gaps that could be addressed through increased use of telemetry <strong>and</strong> remote<br />

monitoring at identified vulnerable asset locations, together with agreed protocols for<br />

the consistent capture of rainfall <strong>and</strong> flood extent data post-event.<br />

High winds tend to cause system-wide impacts, for example widespread line closures.<br />

The lack of information on the impacts of high wind speeds should be addressed<br />

together with the same tools as for rainfall highlighted above.<br />

A similar process could be adopted for any climate change projections which are less<br />

certain, in order to identify vulnerable asset types <strong>and</strong> locations. For new infrastructure,<br />

this might involve checking potential effects <strong>and</strong> impacts. For existing infrastructure, this<br />

might involve a system-wide strategic review of condition <strong>and</strong> exposure. Once<br />

identified, enhanced design, monitoring or other mitigation measures can make<br />

vulnerable assets more resilient.<br />

3.1.5 Recommendations for action – whole system<br />

Due to the large number of recommendations relating to the whole system, a maximum<br />

of three recommendations for each timescale, short, medium <strong>and</strong> long term, are<br />

included in Table 1, with wider recommendations included in Phase 1 Appendix J.<br />

Table 1:<br />

Recommendations for action – whole system<br />

Timescale<br />

Short term<br />

(to action/<br />

implement<br />

before end<br />

of CP5 i.e.<br />

2014-2019)<br />

Recommendations<br />

1. Compile a database of assets, including buildings that are vulnerable to one or<br />

more of the following: excess rainfall; drought; fluvial flooding <strong>and</strong>/ or coastal<br />

flooding. This would be equivalent to the CRT register for stress free<br />

temperatures (SFT). Assess vulnerabilities of assets including interdependencies<br />

<strong>and</strong> ‘knock on effects’ (high precipitation, low precipitation, high sea levels <strong>and</strong><br />

storm surges).<br />

2. Ensure that there is better recording of, <strong>and</strong> attribution to, weather conditions<br />

alongside incident reports where relevant (all climate variables). This would<br />

include the following:<br />

• Capture <strong>and</strong> assess delay minutes associated specifically with rainfall-related<br />

incidents <strong>and</strong> failures (high precipitation)<br />

• Identify any regional variations in the exposure of assets to rainfall-related risks<br />

(high precipitation)<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!