03.01.2018 Aufrufe

atw 2018-1

Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.

YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.

<strong>atw</strong> Vol. 63 (<strong>2018</strong>) | Issue 1 ı January<br />

8<br />

ABSTRACTS | ENGLISH<br />

UK Is Leading the Way With Clear Strategy<br />

for Nuclear<br />

NucNet | Page 10<br />

The UK is Europe’s most prominent leader in nuclear<br />

development because of the government’s clear<br />

strategy of supporting nuclear energy as part of its<br />

future energy mix, a senior official from ­US-based<br />

nuclear equipment manufacturer Westinghouse<br />

Electric Company said. Mr Kirst told that the UK<br />

­government’s decision to support the financing of<br />

new energy projects, including nuclear, by way of a<br />

contract for difference scheme was a breakthrough.<br />

Additionally potential for nuclear development in<br />

other EU member states is possible in Poland and the<br />

Czech Republic where also new nuclear capacities<br />

are possible. Potential exists also in non-EU countries<br />

like Turkey and the Ukraine.<br />

ETSON Strategic Orientations on Research<br />

Activities. ETSON Research Group Activity<br />

J.P. Van Dorsselaere, M. Barrachin, D. Millington,<br />

M. Adorni, M. Hrehor, F. Mascari, A. Schaffrath,<br />

I. Tiselj, E. Uspuras, Y. Yamamoto, D. Gumenyuk,<br />

N. Fedotova, O. Cronvall and P. Liska | Page 13<br />

In 2011, ETSON published the “Position Paper of<br />

the Technical Safety Organizations: Research Needs<br />

in Nuclear Safety for Gen 2 and Gen 3 NPPs”. This<br />

paper, published only a few months after the<br />

Fukushima- Daiichi severe accidents, presented the<br />

priorities for R&D on the main pending safety<br />

­issues. It was produced by the ETSON Research<br />

Group (ERG) that has the mandate of identifying<br />

and prioritizing safety research needs, sharing<br />

­information on research projects in which ETSON<br />

members are involved, defining and launching new<br />

research projects and disseminating knowledge<br />

among ETSON members. Six years after this<br />

publication, many R&D international projects<br />

­finished in diverse frames, and other ones have<br />

started. In particular a lot of work was done (and is<br />

going on…) on the analysis of the Fukushima-<br />

Daiichi severe accidents. Meanwhile a roadmap on<br />

research on Gen. 2 and 3 nuclear power plants<br />

(NPP), including safety aspects, was produced by<br />

the NUGENIA association, followed by a more<br />

­detailed document as “NUGENIA global vision”. It<br />

was also demonstrated that the ETSON R&D<br />

priorities were consistent with the implementation<br />

of the 2014 Euratom Directive on safety of nuclear<br />

installations.<br />

Council Regulation of the European Dual<br />

Use Regulation – A Never Ending Story?<br />

Ulrike Feldmann | Page 19<br />

For the first time, the EC Council Regulation of<br />

19 December 1994 established a Community ­regime<br />

for the control of exports of dual-use items. In 2000,<br />

the first major revision of the dual-use regime came<br />

into force, subjecting not only sensitive material, i.<br />

e. plutonium and highly enriched uranium, but also<br />

the entire category 0 (nuclear material, installations,<br />

equipment) to a licensing requirement for intra-<br />

Community shipments. This revision was revised a<br />

few months later due to inappropriate content by<br />

removing a small proportion of nuclear goods. A<br />

further comprehensive new revision was published<br />

in 2009. However, the EU Commission’s current<br />

proposal to revise Annex IV of the regulation does<br />

not do justice to the objective of free trade of goods<br />

and the maintenance of the competitiveness of<br />

European industry from the point of view of the<br />

European nuclear industry, as well as from the point<br />

of view of the non-nuclear industry in the EU.<br />

Nuclear Safety, Security and Safeguards:<br />

An Application of an Integrated Approach<br />

Howard Chapman, Jeremy Edwards,<br />

Joshua Fitzpatrick, Colette Grundy,<br />

Robert Rodger and Jonathan Scott | Page 21<br />

National Nuclear Laboratory has recently produced<br />

a paper regarding the integrated approach of<br />

nuclear safety, security and safeguards. The paper<br />

considered the international acknowledgement of<br />

the inter-relationships and potential benefits to be<br />

gained through improved integration of the nuclear<br />

‘3S’; Safety, Security and Safeguards. It considered<br />

that combining capabilities into one synergistic<br />

team can provide improved performance and value.<br />

This approach to integration has been adopted, and<br />

benefits realised by the National Nuclear ­Laboratory<br />

through creation of a Safety, Security and<br />

Safeguards team. In some instances the interface is<br />

clear and established, as is the case between safety<br />

and security in the areas of Vital Area Identification.<br />

In others the interface is developing such as the<br />

utilisation of safeguards related techniques such as<br />

nuclear material accountancy and control to<br />

enhance the security of materials. This paper looks<br />

at a practical example of the progress to date in<br />

implementing Triple S by a duty holder.<br />

Clearance of Surface-contaminated Objects<br />

from the Controlled Area of a Nuclear<br />

Facility: Application of the SUDOQU<br />

Methodology<br />

F. Russo, C. Mommaert and T. van Dillen | Page 29<br />

The lack of clearly defined surface-clearance levels in<br />

the Belgian regulation led Bel V to start a collaboration<br />

with the Dutch National Institute for Public<br />

Health and the Environment (RIVM) to evaluate the<br />

applicability of the SUDOQU methodology for the<br />

derivation of nuclide-specific surface-clearance<br />

criteria for objects released from nuclear facilities.<br />

SUDOQU is a methodology for the dose assessment<br />

of exposure to a surface-contaminated object, with<br />

the innovative assumption of a time-dependent<br />

­surface activity whose evolution is influenced by<br />

removal and deposition mechanisms. In this work,<br />

calculations were performed to evaluate the annual<br />

effective dose resulting from the use of a typical<br />

­office item, e.g. a bookcase. Preliminary results ­allow<br />

understanding the interdependencies between the<br />

model’s underlying mechanisms, and show a strong<br />

sensitivity to the main input parameters. The results<br />

were benchmarked against those from a model described<br />

in Radiation Protection 101, to investigate<br />

the impact of the model’s main assumptions. Results<br />

of the two models were in good agreement.<br />

The SUDOQU methodology appears to be a flexible<br />

and powerful tool, suitable for the proposed application.<br />

Therefore, the project will be extended to<br />

more generic study cases, to eventually develop surface-clearance<br />

levels applicable to objects leaving<br />

nuclear facilities.<br />

Carbon-14 Speciation During Anoxic<br />

Corrosion of Activated Steel in a Repository<br />

Environment<br />

E. Wieland, B.Z. Cvetkovic, D. Kunz,<br />

G. Salazar and S. Szidat | Page 34<br />

Radioactive waste contains significant amounts<br />

of 14 C which has been identified a key radionuclide<br />

in safety assessments. In Switzerland, the 14 C inventory<br />

of a cement-based repository for low- and<br />

intermediate-level radioactive waste (L/ILW) is<br />

mainly associated with activated steel (~85 %). 14 C<br />

is produced by 14 N activation in steel parts exposed<br />

to thermal neutron flux in light water reactors.<br />

Release of 14 C occurs in the near field of a deep<br />

geological repository due to anoxic corrosion of<br />

activated steel. Although the 14 C inventory of the<br />

L/ILW repository and the sources of 14 C are well<br />

known, the formation of 14 C species during steel<br />

corrosion is only poorly understood. The aim of the<br />

present study was to identify and quantify the<br />

14 C-bearing carbon species formed during the<br />

anoxic corrosion of iron and steel and further to<br />

determine the 14C speciation in a corrosion experiment<br />

with activated steel. All experiments were<br />

conducted in conditions similar to those anticipated<br />

in the near field of a cement-based repository.<br />

Review of Fuel Safety Criteria in France<br />

Sandrine Boutin, Stephanie Graff,<br />

Aude Foucher-Taisne and Olivier Dubois | Page 38<br />

Fuel safety criteria for the first barrier, based on<br />

state-of-the-art at the time, were first defined in the<br />

1970s and came from the United States, when the<br />

French nuclear program was initiated. Since then,<br />

there has been continuous progress in knowledge<br />

and in collecting experimental results thanks to the<br />

experiments carried out by utilities and research<br />

institutes, to the operating experience, as well as to<br />

the generic R&D programs, which aim notably at<br />

improving computation methodologies, especially<br />

in Reactivity-Initiated accident and Loss-of-Coolant<br />

Accident conditions. In this context, the French<br />

utility EDF proposed new fuel safety criteria, or<br />

reviewed and completed existing safety demonstration<br />

covering the normal operating, incidental<br />

and accidental conditions of Pressurised Water<br />

­Reactors. IRSN assessed EDF’s proposals and presented<br />

its conclusions to the Advisory Committee<br />

for Reactors Safety of the Nuclear Safety Authority<br />

in June 2017. This review focused on the relevance<br />

of historical limit values or parameters of fuel safety<br />

criteria and their adequacy with the state-of-the-art<br />

concerning fuel physical phenomena (e.g. Pellet-<br />

Cladding Mechanical Interaction in incidental conditions,<br />

clad embrittlement due to high temperature<br />

oxidation in accidental conditions, clad ballooning<br />

and burst during boiling crisis and fuel melting).<br />

AMNT 2017: Outstanding Know-How &<br />

Sustainable Innovations – Technical Session:<br />

Reactor Physics, Thermo and Fluid Dynamics<br />

Enhanced Safety & Operation Excellence –<br />

Focus Session: Radiation Protection<br />

Joachim Herb, Erik Baumann and<br />

Angelika Bohnstedt | Page 44<br />

Summary report on the Key Topics “Outstanding<br />

Know-How & Sustainable Innovations – Technical<br />

Session: Reactor Physics, Thermo and Fluid<br />

Dynamics” and “Enhanced Safety & Operation Excellence<br />

– Focus Session: Radiation Protection” of<br />

the 48 th Annual Meeting on ­Nuclear Technology<br />

(AMNT 2017) held in Berlin, 16 to 17 May 2017.<br />

‘Newcomer’ Nuclear Nation Leads Way Into<br />

New Nuclear Year<br />

John Shepherd | Page 66<br />

At the start of a new year, it is appropriate that a<br />

‘newcomer’ nuclear nation has launched work on<br />

building its first nuclear power plant. First nuclear<br />

safety-related concrete has been poured for the<br />

plant at Rooppur in Bangladesh – making the South<br />

Asia nation the first in 30 years to start building its<br />

first commercial reactor unit following the United<br />

Arab Emirates in 2012 and Belarus in 2013.<br />

Despite setbacks that nuclear has endured in recent<br />

years, there are nearly 60 reactors under construction<br />

around the world, mostly in Asia. Some<br />

447 commercial reactor units are in operation in<br />

30 countries.<br />

Abstracts | English

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!