Digital Economy
In dieser Ausgabe des "forward" Magazins legen wir den Fokus auf die „Digital Economy“ und beschäftigen uns mit den Chancen und Risken, die die digitale Transformation mit sich bringt. Die beiden Programmdirektor*innen des interdisziplinären WU Master Programms Digital Economy geben im F&A Interview einen Einblick zu den Voraussetzungen, den unterschiedlichen Spezialisierungen und praxisorientierten Research & Industry Labs des Masterstudiums.
In dieser Ausgabe des "forward" Magazins legen wir den Fokus auf die „Digital Economy“ und beschäftigen uns mit den Chancen und Risken, die die digitale Transformation mit sich bringt.
Die beiden Programmdirektor*innen des interdisziplinären WU Master Programms Digital Economy geben im F&A Interview einen Einblick zu den Voraussetzungen, den unterschiedlichen Spezialisierungen und praxisorientierten Research & Industry Labs des Masterstudiums.
Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen
Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.
DIGITALE TRANSFORMATION | DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION<br />
Today many companies need a spirit of innovation, flexibility,<br />
and technical know-how to ensure their economic<br />
success and competitiveness. For this reason,<br />
managers have been forced to expand their skill set in recent<br />
years. In addition to a clear grasp of business administration,<br />
they now also need basic knowledge of IT systems and change<br />
management. To keep up with the competition, it’s vital to<br />
digitize all processes. Artificial intelligence, big data, cloud<br />
computing, algorithms, business intelligence, the smart home<br />
as well as virtual and augmented reality are just some of the<br />
terms that we have all had to adopt and which are common<br />
currency in businesses with a digital profile.<br />
Corporate management in flux<br />
But which specific demands does the digital transformation<br />
place on modern management? What should managers focus<br />
on if they wish to keep pace with the digital transformation? For<br />
Prof. Edward Bernroider,<br />
head of WU’s Department<br />
It’s necessary<br />
to change your<br />
business root<br />
and branch in<br />
order to maintain<br />
long-term<br />
competitiveness.<br />
of Information Systems<br />
and Operations Management<br />
and chair of the<br />
Institute for Information<br />
Management and Control,<br />
company leaders must<br />
walk a fine line at this time<br />
of digital transformation:<br />
“On the one hand, it’s<br />
necessary to change your<br />
business root and branch<br />
in order to maintain longterm<br />
competitiveness. On the other hand, managers have to<br />
ensure stability and security within any process of optimization,<br />
which naturally hinders greater innovation.” Bernroider<br />
emphasizes the various ways to achieve these inherently<br />
conflicting goals through what he calls bimodal management:<br />
“A balance must be sought. It’s possible to alternate between<br />
sequential and structural approaches. In any case, everyday<br />
tasks should not be disrupted. A modern management team<br />
must find the right balance between carrying out their daily<br />
operations and implementing long-term projects if they wish<br />
to successfully accomplish the digital transformation of their<br />
own company.”<br />
For Prof. Bernroider, modern (bimodal) management must<br />
understand both the potentials and risks of digital transformation<br />
holistically as it impacts each individual company. Only<br />
those digitalization and automation projects should be promoted<br />
that are already anchored – or will be anchored – in the<br />
respective business model. Managers are also advised to carefully<br />
analyze risks to ensure that they can take the right steps in<br />
an emergency.<br />
As Bernroider points out: “University research, especially at<br />
WU’s Institute for Information Management and Control, is<br />
currently very active in examining this field of tension – from<br />
the perspective of agility as well as that of stability, or indeed<br />
a combination of both factors. While there certainly exist many<br />
reference models and standards on these topics, they are very<br />
general and need to be specifically adapted for each organization<br />
to be of any use.”<br />
Start-ups sind für die digitale Transformation besser gewappnet, da sie<br />
keine veralteten digitalen Strukturen überwinden müssen<br />
Startups are better equipped for the digital transformation because<br />
they don’t have to get rid of outdated digital structures<br />
Dr. Stefan Bauer is an educational designer, innovation enthusiast,<br />
alumnus, and passionate entrepreneur. Also a lecturer<br />
at the Institute for Information Management and Control, he<br />
sees the vast opportunities that the digital transformation can<br />
bring and is convinced that new technologies can help optimize<br />
processes and design innovative products and services that will<br />
revolutionize the working world for employees. But when we<br />
talk about new technologies, what precisely do we mean? And<br />
which demands do they place on<br />
Managers<br />
can only<br />
react in time<br />
if they also<br />
understand<br />
the new<br />
technologies.<br />
managers? In this context, Stefan<br />
Bauer emphasizes the increasing<br />
value of reacting quickly to<br />
changes brought about by digitalization.<br />
“Managers can only<br />
react in time if they also understand<br />
the new technologies. Take<br />
augmented and virtual reality<br />
(AR and VR) as examples. Will AR<br />
and VR really catch on next year,<br />
or will customer interest simply<br />
be a flash in the pan? Many companies<br />
have kept tabs on various<br />
disruptive technologies for some time, but it’s up to top managers<br />
to decide which innovations to pursue and which not.”<br />
And, according to Bauer, this process involves some risk-taking.<br />
Bimodal management and new skills<br />
Edward Bernroider emphasizes that management must make<br />
sure that crucial competitive advantages are exploited through<br />
innovation, especially in a period of great external uncertainty.<br />
At the same time, however, the core tasks in a company’s daily<br />
operations should be safeguarded. According to Bernroider,<br />
few companies effectively meet this requirement: “In established<br />
businesses, resistance arises out of the history of previous<br />
IT decisions, creating so-called path dependencies. Mature<br />
IT architectures with their legacy systems that are difficult to<br />
modernize will, over time, hinder innovation; in the long run,<br />
stability and security are undermined.” For this reason, newcomers<br />
to the market (such as startups) have an easier time<br />
with the digital transformation, as they don’t have to overcome<br />
any legacy systems.<br />
Bernroider believes that a modern top manager should be<br />
able to properly execute planned changes whose repercussions<br />
cannot yet be fully grasped. This requires a flexible and agile<br />
managerial outlook, without neglecting the need to ensure<br />
stability and security: “For this, you need well-functioning<br />
governance, including risk management. Moreover, structured<br />
program management and project management skills<br />
are essential to create a much-needed overview. Of course, a<br />
passion for digitalization and technical know-how are also<br />
particularly helpful.” For Bernroider, a culture of collaboration<br />
places other core requirements on agile management, namely<br />
strong communication skills and a willingness to adapt one’s<br />
leadership style.<br />
But the demands on top management have also changed in the<br />
field of controlling: “While the annual and consolidated financial<br />
statement audit are still hugely important, increasingly<br />
these are being supplemented by considerations of governance,<br />
risk, and compliance (GRC). Especially in the case of major<br />
digital transformation projects, top managers should retain a<br />
general overview and be able to facilitate a risk-oriented audit<br />
of the financial statements.”<br />
<strong>Digital</strong>ization and staff management<br />
But what impact does bimodal management have on employees?<br />
Are they forced to adapt to new systems and tools? Stefan<br />
Bauer sees novel rituals for the working world emerge from<br />
agile organizational models: “Here new rituals are fundamental.<br />
They consist of innovative tools such as messaging in<br />
MS Teams, Slack or Kanban boards, meeting formats such as<br />
review appointments or retrospectives, and an agile mindset in<br />
project management. To successfully implement these tools, it<br />
is necessary to adapt the manager’s leadership behavior.”<br />
To what extent can intelligent information systems really influence<br />
the workflow? It’s the opinion of innovation manager Stefan<br />
Bauer that modern processes can be automated in a variety<br />
of ways using robotic process automation (RPA) software. This<br />
type of automation is particularly suitable for back-office activities,<br />
which are often repetitive and rule-based. By automating<br />
such processes, companies can save time and money, freeing up<br />
resources for more important tasks. As Bauer explains: “Examples<br />
of typical back-office activities that can be automated using<br />
RPA are data entry, form processing or rote calculations.”<br />
Processes could be further optimized through the use of text recognition<br />
systems such as optical character recognition (OCR),<br />
intelligent character recognition (ICR) and natural language<br />
processing (NLP). These all enable users to detect and process<br />
texts. According to Bauer, such technologies assist in the automation<br />
of numerous processes, thereby boosting efficiency. To<br />
fully exploit the potential of RPA, managers must first identify<br />
the benefits for their own business units and draw up an automation<br />
roadmap for the next few years. This is the only way to<br />
ensure that organizations profit from new technologies in the<br />
long term and maintain their competitive edge.<br />
The opportunities and risks of digital transformation<br />
Edward Bernroider sees the advancing tide of digitalization<br />
with conflicting emotions: “Of course, there are not only positive<br />
aspects. Many basic technologies are now finally reaching<br />
maturity and being increasingly adopted by companies. We can<br />
point to major innovations, for example in the areas of hybrid<br />
clouds, artificial intelligence (AI), or blockchains. There have also<br />
been significant methodological innovations such as no-code<br />
and low-code development platforms or RPA, which will further<br />
accelerate the process of digitalization. These technologies and<br />
methods have the potential to radically change companies’ economic<br />
thinking and scope of action.” Bernroider adds that while<br />
the potential benefits for the business sector are huge, the topic<br />
must be dealt with holistically, systematically, and consistently<br />
to ensure that the opportunities outweigh the risks.<br />
The great danger of rushing into technical change is that it will<br />
be incompletely planned, tested and implemented. This may<br />
often result in hidden costs from “technical debts”, which have<br />
to be reworked at some later date. Many companies have been<br />
forced to accelerate their digital transformation, especially in<br />
the last two years, due to the pandemic and related issues – and<br />
not always to great success. From the perspective of risk management,<br />
this has led to security gaps in IT systems, for example,<br />
which could potentially bring operations to a complete halt. In<br />
such cases, control mechanisms have to be tightened. In the long<br />
term, such technical debts can constrain the ability to innovate:<br />
It is difficult to find new solutions when a company is busy trying<br />
to fix or update parts of their current IT system.<br />
Will AI soon be in a position to replace top managers?<br />
Together with Stefan Bauer and Edward Bernroider, let’s<br />
peer into the crystal ball. Bauer always asks students in his<br />
courses how they see the future of management and AI. Some<br />
would accept an AI system<br />
It’s only a<br />
matter of time<br />
before the<br />
first companies<br />
delegate<br />
unpleasant issues<br />
to an AI system.<br />
as their boss, especially if<br />
the program is fed data of<br />
past decisions by international<br />
managers and thus<br />
will supposedly make wise<br />
decisions. As Bauer says:<br />
“In certain areas such as<br />
autonomous driving, we are<br />
basically putting our lives<br />
in the hands of an artificial<br />
intelligence. While the business<br />
sector is not yet ready to<br />
outsource important decisions,<br />
I think it’s only a matter of time before the first companies<br />
delegate unpleasant issues to an AI system.”<br />
Edward Bernroider also assumes that management processes<br />
will be digitalized and taken over by AI systems:<br />
“Today many management<br />
decisions are still<br />
either made by gut<br />
instinct or based<br />
on incomplete<br />
information. In<br />
the future, many<br />
decisions could be<br />
made independently<br />
and wisely by some<br />
system of artificial<br />
intelligence or, at the<br />
very least, AI will support<br />
human decision-making.”<br />
8 9