09.06.2013 Views

MediaAcT

How fragile is media credibility? Accountability and transparency in journalism: research, debates, perspectives Final Research Report | Media Accountability and Transparency in Europe

How fragile is media credibility? Accountability and transparency in journalism: research, debates, perspectives
Final Research Report | Media Accountability and Transparency in Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1<br />

Index | Editorial | Birds-eye view | Opening the toolbox toolbox|<br />

Zoom-in on the newsroom | Media landscapes<br />

OFFine<br />

Example 10: Responsiveness IV<br />

A good way to include the audience in the reflection and<br />

production processes are readers’ advisory boards. Amongst<br />

others, they are practiced by the German boulevard<br />

newspaper BILD (http://bit.ly/MMsYPn), the Austrian local<br />

newspaper Vorarlberger Nachrichten (http://bit.ly/OZ3dwT),<br />

the Swiss boulevard newspaper Sonntagsblick (http://bit.<br />

ly/Oo9MHG) and the Catalan newspaper El Punt (http://<br />

bit.ly/QwmOVg). The advisory councils are composed of<br />

readers representing the diversity of the audience. They<br />

are elected once a year. Their “task” is to attend panels<br />

in the newspaper’s headquarters and discuss their ideas,<br />

share their opinions and give feedback. Such tools ensure<br />

transparency, foster media literacy and have a high impact<br />

on the loyalty of the users.<br />

Online<br />

Example 11: External Tools<br />

Next to these company internal innovations one<br />

can find new tools that empower the audience<br />

in the process of media regulation and selfregulation.<br />

Since the advent of the Internet,<br />

it has been possible for the audience to get its<br />

voice heard easily, inexpensively and with the<br />

possibility of reaching a lot of other interested<br />

people. Users can participate in the process of<br />

media accountability, for example, by writing<br />

their own media watch blogs. Examples can<br />

be found in many countries: MediaBugs, USA<br />

(http://mediabugs.org/), BildBLOG, Germany<br />

(http://www.bildblog.de/), Merkintöjä mediasta,<br />

Finland (http://outi.posterous.com/) or kobuk,<br />

Austria (http://www.kobuk.at/).<br />

Best practice examples online:<br />

Online<br />

Example 8: Responsiveness II<br />

The open newsroom policy of The Guardian<br />

is a remarkable concept. Next to many<br />

other tools, they offer their newslist to all<br />

users. On this website users are able to see<br />

which stories are discussed or produced by<br />

the newspaper’s staff or what the editors<br />

think about their coverage. The readers get<br />

a good idea of how the news is produced.<br />

Furthermore, they can post what they think<br />

of the stories or suggest ideas – all userfriendly<br />

via Twitter or Email. The newslist<br />

is a format which is easy and inexpensive<br />

to establish as it can be an embedded<br />

Google document (http://www.guardian.<br />

co.uk/help/insideguardian/2011/oct/10/<br />

guardian-newslist).<br />

OFFline<br />

Example 14:<br />

Production Transparency IV<br />

An internal offline practice is the<br />

“early paper critique” as is done by<br />

the Swiss Bieler Zeitung (http://www.<br />

quajou.ch/downloads/medienaward/Dokumentation_Medien-<br />

Award_2005.pdf). All articles<br />

produced before 6pm (before<br />

the newspaper goes into print)<br />

are collectively analysed by the<br />

editors involved. The articles are<br />

always presented by the head of<br />

the news division. At least one of<br />

the chief editors, as well as the art<br />

director, have to be present. This<br />

instrument fosters a lively internal<br />

debate on quality, accuracy and<br />

decision-making.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!