- Page 1 and 2: UNIVERSITÉ PARIS-DAUPHINE ÉCOLE D
- Page 4 and 5: Remerciements Au terme de ces anné
- Page 6: Abstract This PhD thesis focuses on
- Page 9 and 10: viii
- Page 11 and 12: quotas mais cette fois-ci au niveau
- Page 13 and 14: Une autre tendance de fond sur les
- Page 15 and 16: carbone. Une autre stratégie a con
- Page 17 and 18: L’analyse de l’impact des inves
- Page 19 and 20: options financières, les approches
- Page 21 and 22: coût d’investissement encore plu
- Page 23 and 24: (interprétable comme un taux de cr
- Page 25 and 26: chapitre), nous remarquons dans la
- Page 27 and 28: 2.3.3 Swaps . . . . . . . . . . . .
- Page 29 and 30: 2.15 Changes in carbon-emitting att
- Page 31: 28 Appendix - MCt -Continuationvalu
- Page 35 and 36: on this portion of installations -
- Page 37 and 38: status of the market (giving rise t
- Page 40 and 41: Chapter 1 European utilities’ res
- Page 42 and 43: anism allowing annex I countries to
- Page 44 and 45: that 49% of them where solely produ
- Page 46 and 47: ��� ��� ��� �
- Page 48 and 49: the countries’ full economic deve
- Page 50 and 51: ! !"#$%&'()*! * * +,,"-.%'"$* /0.)(
- Page 52 and 53: The major changes brought to the po
- Page 54 and 55: for Phase III of the EU ETS, calcul
- Page 56 and 57: create green jobs. This was used in
- Page 58 and 59: Later stage - deployment of technol
- Page 60 and 61: LIBOR and EURIBOR rates (thanks to
- Page 62 and 63: On the other hand, the European ind
- Page 64 and 65: Table 1.1: Key operating data on to
- Page 66 and 67: Assessment of the abatement alterna
- Page 68 and 69: carbon assets. Results of this simp
- Page 70 and 71: later as the gas-fired power plant
- Page 72 and 73: An alternative to purchasing carbon
- Page 74 and 75: • Monitoring: supervision of the
- Page 76 and 77: more efficient. In the first case (
- Page 78 and 79: performed with feasibility studies
- Page 80 and 81: largest one is EDF Trading Carbon F
- Page 82 and 83:
and (3) establishing a firmer regul
- Page 84 and 85:
the European power sector. We discu
- Page 86 and 87:
Chapter 2 Operating and financial i
- Page 88 and 89:
Beyond merely providing an analysis
- Page 90 and 91:
several areas. They typically rank
- Page 92 and 93:
Compared to operating investments,
- Page 94 and 95:
We traced 254 investment overall wi
- Page 96 and 97:
)###$ (###$ '###$ "###$ %###$ &###$
- Page 98 and 99:
%#!!!" %!!!!" $#!!!" $!!!!" #!!!" !
- Page 100 and 101:
Renewables As regards projects in t
- Page 102 and 103:
closed 15 . As depicted in Figure 2
- Page 104 and 105:
was the most significant deal in th
- Page 106 and 107:
)*+,-(.+/0( !"($ 67#%28( 1"2$%&3( )
- Page 108 and 109:
Even excluding the impact of Endesa
- Page 110 and 111:
Egypt. Other investments Other sign
- Page 112 and 113:
Non-core activities include all the
- Page 114 and 115:
Regulation and contractual obligati
- Page 116 and 117:
732 million, (2) transfer of owners
- Page 118 and 119:
emissions close to 8.7 GtCO2 overal
- Page 120 and 121:
coal-fired generation was transferr
- Page 122 and 123:
-./0&12345% 620&12345% 7/8&12345% -
- Page 124 and 125:
project mechanisms for their own co
- Page 126:
planned generation has a high strat
- Page 129 and 130:
price of carbon), (3) flexibility i
- Page 131 and 132:
Step 3 - calculations of discounted
- Page 133 and 134:
(1) Adjust the discount rate for ri
- Page 135 and 136:
Benefits Table 3.6: Pros and cons o
- Page 137 and 138:
lending facilities and ability to i
- Page 139 and 140:
Benefits Table 3.8: Pros and cons o
- Page 141 and 142:
Alternative criteria 3 - book rate
- Page 143 and 144:
(2) DDCF is a proven method (25.6%)
- Page 145 and 146:
should the price of the underlying
- Page 147 and 148:
evolution Xt of a variable X over t
- Page 149 and 150:
• Econometrics based on historica
- Page 151 and 152:
steps between jumps, the better the
- Page 153 and 154:
uation (taking into account the fle
- Page 155 and 156:
with a stochastic fuel price (model
- Page 157 and 158:
the introduction of the EU ETS on t
- Page 159 and 160:
if the actual price path had been k
- Page 161 and 162:
in the case of Germany that would n
- Page 163 and 164:
discounted at a per period factor e
- Page 165 and 166:
In an application to optimal rotati
- Page 167 and 168:
pressuring and legal challenges hav
- Page 169 and 170:
We set ∆t =1/255 11 and obtain th
- Page 171 and 172:
time. Given the power plant investm
- Page 173 and 174:
Table 3.13: Parameters for the powe
- Page 175 and 176:
The next period budget corresponds
- Page 177 and 178:
• Nuclear power plants characteri
- Page 179 and 180:
ternatives. Table 3.15: Power plant
- Page 181 and 182:
• ˆp c t,ˆp p t ,andˆpb t are
- Page 183 and 184:
ˆp b,i t ������ ��
- Page 185 and 186:
���� ���� ���
- Page 187 and 188:
and baseload prices. It should be s
- Page 189 and 190:
Of course, in no way would price be
- Page 191 and 192:
eversion speed recognizes the possi
- Page 193 and 194:
offshore parks now and one later (u
- Page 195 and 196:
7$89:;%.8'8=% 8=% ;'8=% ;98=% ;
- Page 197 and 198:
can be allocated on the basis of hi
- Page 199 and 200:
environment (constant annual volati
- Page 201 and 202:
("6% !"#$%&'( :;% 29% 9% !"#$%&"#$%
- Page 203 and 204:
investor turns to the investment co
- Page 205 and 206:
in dirty generation given and that
- Page 207 and 208:
of suggested investment combination
- Page 209 and 210:
slight exposure remains), (2) CCGT
- Page 211 and 212:
See figure 3.22 for a representatio
- Page 213 and 214:
wind, thereby emitting more CO2 in
- Page 215 and 216:
to commercial solutions developed t
- Page 217 and 218:
with crashing phase II prices and s
- Page 219 and 220:
plant, shut down plants, etc.), (3)
- Page 222 and 223:
.1 Survey table of carbon price pro
- Page 224 and 225:
.2 LSM methodology In this appendix
- Page 226 and 227:
We consider all the possible budget
- Page 228 and 229:
Table 18: Illustrative case - Impli
- Page 230 and 231:
astochasticproblemby8singledetermin
- Page 232 and 233:
Table 23: Illustrative case - Decis
- Page 234 and 235:
26. Based on this optimal decision
- Page 236 and 237:
⎞ ⎟ ⎠ Table 27: Appendix - MR
- Page 238 and 239:
Table 29: Appendix - MVt and Mx ∗
- Page 240 and 241:
K.inves=1166;%initial investment ou
- Page 242 and 243:
price.GAS = repmat(GasEURperMMBTU,
- Page 244 and 245:
(price.slopebase/info.step)*(1:info
- Page 246 and 247:
% contemporaneous baseload prices %
- Page 248 and 249:
% for IGC profit.PiI=(I.output*365)
- Page 250 and 251:
profit.PiW((W.build+(euets.fit1leng
- Page 252 and 253:
for j=1:combi.MAX combi.OKCOMBindex
- Page 254 and 255:
end %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
- Page 256 and 257:
Bibliography [1] A.K. Dixit and R.S
- Page 258 and 259:
[36] European Commission. Impact as
- Page 260 and 261:
[69] P.P. Boyle. Options: a Monte C
- Page 262 and 263:
[93] M. Ventosa, A. Baillo, A. Ramo