Corporate social responsability and loyalty in services sector - Esic
Corporate social responsability and loyalty in services sector - Esic
Corporate social responsability and loyalty in services sector - Esic
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
202 11<br />
[202]<br />
corporate <strong>social</strong> <strong>responsability</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>loyalty</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>services</strong> <strong>sector</strong><br />
ditionally studied <strong>in</strong> market<strong>in</strong>g literature (Bloemer et al., 1999; Hellier et<br />
al., 2003).<br />
Concern<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>clusion of <strong>social</strong> matters, there are not many doubts<br />
on this matter. In fact, corporate <strong>social</strong> responsibility was <strong>in</strong>tended on<br />
some occasions to be a one-dimensional variable, centred on the company’s<br />
orientation towards society <strong>and</strong> environment (Brown <strong>and</strong> Dac<strong>in</strong>,<br />
1997; H<strong>and</strong>elmann <strong>and</strong> Arnold, 1999). However, consider<strong>in</strong>g that responsible<br />
behaviour <strong>in</strong>cludes all moral obligations that maximize the company’s<br />
positive impact on the <strong>social</strong> environment <strong>and</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imize its negative<br />
one (Pride <strong>and</strong> Ferrell, 1997), it is more correct to widen the concept <strong>and</strong><br />
regard it as multidimensional (Maignan, 2001; Graafl<strong>and</strong> et al., 2004).<br />
3. Socially responsible behaviour <strong>in</strong> <strong>loyalty</strong> models:<br />
literary review <strong>and</strong> foundation of research hypotheses<br />
The purchase of some products can be risky for consumers, a fact that<br />
should encourage market<strong>in</strong>g managers to analyze the perceptions of their<br />
products <strong>and</strong> br<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> the strategies used on the part of clients when it<br />
comes to buy<strong>in</strong>g (Pérez, 2008). The same analysis must be done <strong>in</strong> order<br />
to identify the key attributes to create customer <strong>loyalty</strong>. In this sense, the<br />
first one is to def<strong>in</strong>e the true <strong>loyalty</strong>, differentiat<strong>in</strong>g on this matter two<br />
approaches: behavioural <strong>and</strong> attitud<strong>in</strong>al. The behavioural perspective considers<br />
consumers to be loyal when they rebuy the product or use a service<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ually (Jones et al., 2000). However, this approach has been criticized<br />
because it does not take affective issues <strong>in</strong>to account. The second perspective<br />
overcomes this limitation def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>loyalty</strong> as “the degree to which a<br />
customer exhibits repeat purchas<strong>in</strong>g behaviour from a service provider,<br />
possesses a positive attitud<strong>in</strong>al disposition toward the provider, <strong>and</strong> considers<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g only this provider when a need for this service arises’’ (Gremler<br />
y Brown, 1996). Therefore, the role of attitude <strong>in</strong> customer <strong>loyalty</strong> is<br />
vital, s<strong>in</strong>ce a previous positive attitude is required to consider repetitive<br />
behaviour as true <strong>loyalty</strong> (García et al., 2006).<br />
Tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account this second perspective, it is common to <strong>in</strong>clude<br />
perceived service quality, image <strong>and</strong> switch<strong>in</strong>g costs as <strong>in</strong>dependent variables<br />
<strong>in</strong> the <strong>loyalty</strong> models. On the one h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> consider<strong>in</strong>g that true<br />
january · april 2011 · esic market