Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
Battle for China's Past : Mao and the Cultural Revolution
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>the</strong> enemy class of rightists or about his role in <strong>the</strong> disastrous Great<br />
Leap Forward, both events that helped shaped <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong> <strong>Cultural</strong><br />
<strong>Revolution</strong> developed (Xu Zidong 2006).<br />
Autobiographical ‘fiction’<br />
There is a group of writers who write in Chinese <strong>and</strong> publish in China,<br />
apparently without too much constraint. Examples of this group are Lao<br />
Gui (1987), Zhou Changmin (1993), <strong>and</strong> Liang Xiaosheng (1988). 5 There<br />
are a number of reasons <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> publication of <strong>the</strong>se works without<br />
apparent censorship. First, <strong>the</strong> books fall in line with <strong>the</strong> official policy<br />
of condemning <strong>the</strong> <strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>Revolution</strong>. Second, <strong>the</strong>y were published in<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>m of novels, which, according to <strong>the</strong> authorities, do not present a<br />
record of history. Third, <strong>the</strong>y were published by minor publishers in<br />
remote provinces <strong>and</strong> thus initially escaped <strong>the</strong> central authorities’<br />
control. Fourth, <strong>the</strong>y do not name real personalities. Finally, in general,<br />
<strong>the</strong>se books are about ordinary people’s ordinary lives <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e<br />
sensitive <strong>and</strong> high-ranking CCP officials are not involved.<br />
These so-called fictional books are actually autobiographical. Zhou<br />
Changmin’s address is printed in his book, <strong>and</strong> thus I was able to<br />
contact him. He told me that every story in <strong>the</strong> book was a retelling of<br />
true events <strong>and</strong> only <strong>the</strong> names of <strong>the</strong> characters were not real. Xu<br />
Zidong (2006) has done a content analysis of about 50 novels of this<br />
kind <strong>and</strong> finds that <strong>the</strong>y can be summarized into four categories: 1)<br />
victim stories, that is tales of good people being victimized by bad<br />
people; 2) tales with a moral, showing how <strong>the</strong> writers overcame <strong>the</strong><br />
bad events in <strong>the</strong>ir lives; 3) stories of absurdity (as seen from today’s<br />
point of view); <strong>and</strong> 4) stories of misunderst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> mistakes. Zhou<br />
Changmin’s memoirs have all <strong>the</strong>se elements.<br />
Family memories<br />
CONSTRUCTING HISTORY<br />
Many o<strong>the</strong>rs, like Deng <strong>Mao</strong>mao, have written about relatives who were<br />
prominent CCP personalities. These include Zhu Min (1996), Dong Bian<br />
et al. (1992), Dian Dian (1987), Zhang Hanzhi (1994a <strong>and</strong> 1994b), Liu Siqi<br />
<strong>and</strong> Wang Hebing (1993), Wang Guangmei <strong>and</strong> Liu Yuan (2000), Wang<br />
Guangying <strong>and</strong> Liu Pingping et al. (1992). 6 A brief examination of <strong>the</strong>se<br />
memoirs shows that most writers <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir parents were portrayed as<br />
<strong>the</strong> victims of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>Revolution</strong> radicalism but were restored to<br />
positions of power <strong>and</strong> glory or vindicated later. 7<br />
Underst<strong>and</strong>ably, memoirs by <strong>the</strong> victims or relatives of victims of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>Revolution</strong> radicalism often tell stories of brutality <strong>and</strong> experiences<br />
of suffering. Generally, <strong>the</strong>y do not blame <strong>Mao</strong> directly <strong>and</strong> personally,<br />
but only indirectly by pointing <strong>the</strong>ir fingers at <strong>the</strong> Gang of Four <strong>and</strong><br />
[ 51 ]