01.03.2013 Views

The-Tibetan-Book-of-Living-and-Dying

The-Tibetan-Book-of-Living-and-Dying

The-Tibetan-Book-of-Living-and-Dying

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE NATURE OF MIND 51<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> mind is just too close to be recognized. Just<br />

as we are unable to see our own face, mind finds it difficult to<br />

look into its own nature.<br />

2. It is too pr<strong>of</strong>ound for us to fathom. We have no idea how<br />

deep it could be; if we did, we would have already, to a certain<br />

extent, realized it.<br />

3. It is too easy for us to believe. In reality, all we need do<br />

is simply to rest in the naked, pure awareness <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong><br />

mind, which is always present.<br />

4. It is too wonderful for us to accommodate. <strong>The</strong> sheer<br />

immensity <strong>of</strong> it is too vast to fit into our narrow way <strong>of</strong><br />

thinking. We just can't believe it. Nor can we possibly imagine<br />

that enlightenment is the real nature <strong>of</strong> our minds.<br />

If this analysis <strong>of</strong> the four faults was true in a civilization<br />

like Tibet, devoted almost entirely to the pursuit <strong>of</strong> enlightenment,<br />

how much more strikingly <strong>and</strong> poignantly true must it<br />

be <strong>of</strong> modern civilization, which is largely devoted to the pursuit<br />

<strong>of</strong> the cult <strong>of</strong> delusion. <strong>The</strong>re is no general information<br />

about the nature <strong>of</strong> mind. It is hardly ever written about by<br />

writers or intellectuals; modem philosophers do not speak <strong>of</strong> it<br />

directly; the majority <strong>of</strong> scientists deny it could possibly be<br />

there at all. It plays no part in popular culture: No one sings<br />

about it; no one talks about it in plays; <strong>and</strong> it's not on TV. We<br />

are actually educated into believing that nothing is real beyond<br />

what we can perceive with our ordinary senses.<br />

Despite this massive <strong>and</strong> nearly all-pervasive denial <strong>of</strong> its<br />

existence, we still sometimes have fleeting glimpses <strong>of</strong> the<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> mind. <strong>The</strong>se could be inspired by a certain exalting<br />

piece <strong>of</strong> music, by the serene happiness we sometimes feel in<br />

nature, or by the most ordinary everyday situation. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

could arise simply while watching snow slowly drifting down,<br />

or seeing the sun rising behind a mountain, or watching a<br />

shaft <strong>of</strong> light falling into a room in a mysteriously moving<br />

way. Such moments <strong>of</strong> illumination, peace, <strong>and</strong> bliss happen<br />

to us all <strong>and</strong> stay strangely with us.<br />

I think we do, sometimes, half underst<strong>and</strong> these glimpses,<br />

but modern culture gives us no context or framework in<br />

which to comprehend them. Worse still, rather than encouraging<br />

us to explore these glimpses more deeply <strong>and</strong> discover<br />

where they spring from, we are told in both obvious <strong>and</strong><br />

subtle ways to shut them out. We know that no one will take<br />

us seriously if we try to share them. So we ignore what could<br />

be really the most revealing experiences <strong>of</strong> our lives, if only

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!