02.03.2013 Views

'Tit-bits from Temperley' - Durham Bird Club

'Tit-bits from Temperley' - Durham Bird Club

'Tit-bits from Temperley' - Durham Bird Club

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Tit-<strong>bits</strong> <strong>from</strong> Temperley<br />

The <strong>Bird</strong>s of <strong>Durham</strong> Heritage Project<br />

‘Bringing the wildlife of the past, to the people of tomorrow’<br />

species <strong>from</strong> the continent. In the preceding months birds had been noted in Norfolk,<br />

Essex and Kent.<br />

Nightjar<br />

It was called a “summer resident; not numerous and very<br />

local in its distribution” by Temperley. He said, “breeds about<br />

the fringes of the moorlands in the western part of the<br />

County”, “less frequently on scrubby open ground, amongst<br />

heather, gorse or young trees”, in the east. He said that it<br />

was probably more common in Hutchinson‟s time (1840s) but<br />

George Temperley thought it unlikely to have been common<br />

in the previous 150 years. A nightjar breeding on the<br />

outskirts of South Shields in 1933 and 1943 was seen every<br />

night within three miles of the town. Temperley also said that on the Derwent it can<br />

still be found at favoured spots a few miles <strong>from</strong> its confluence with the Tyne.<br />

Blue-tailed Bee-eater (Meriops superciliosus philippinus)<br />

This species was recorded by Hancock as having been shot near Seaton Carew in<br />

1862, but Temperley said that it was not admitted to the British list and he believed<br />

that the specimen was shot at Branch End on the Yorkshire side of the Tees,<br />

presumably an escaped bird or a deliberate hoax? This sub-species is native to<br />

India, south east Asia east to New Guinea and has not been recorded in Britain.<br />

Roller<br />

There were two records in the Victorian period. One, according to Selby (1831) was<br />

shot near South Shields, sometime before 1831. The second record, was also of a<br />

bird that was shot, in the Hunwick Estate, in the Wear valley, on the 25 th or 26 th May<br />

1872, by H. Gornall of Bishop Auckland.<br />

Kingfisher<br />

Temperley said, “A resident, more common than is usually<br />

supposed”. He mentioned its moving to the coast in the autumn and<br />

winter, and records sightings of, presumably dispersing juveniles, in<br />

autumn at unusual locations such as Hebburn Ponds, Saltwell Park<br />

Lake (Gateshead) and Darlington South Park Lake. A bird found on<br />

Back Redheugh Road, Gateshead on September 1943 had been<br />

ringed at Kirkley Mill near Ponteland, Northumberland.<br />

Green Woodpecker<br />

George Temperley said of it a “not uncommon resident in wooded districts”. He<br />

recorded a change in its status during his „recorded times‟. Until the early 1800s, he<br />

thought that it must have been a common and widespread species, this was followed<br />

by a severe decline, after which it was considered „rare‟ for quite a period of time.<br />

Not until well into the 1900s did a significant increase in numbers occur again, and,<br />

<strong>from</strong> then on, the species spread quickly after its first burst of population expansion<br />

during the first two or three decades of the 20 th century.<br />

Great Spotted Woodpecker<br />

George Temperley said that it was rare in the early part of the 1800s, and it was not<br />

included in some early catalogues of species, e.g. Hogg (1824) had never seen one<br />

in north Cleveland, indicating that it was genuinely scarce in that area. Edward<br />

Backhouse thought it less plentiful than green woodpecker Picus viridis which was<br />

then not uncommon. Hogg (1840) stated that it was “an exceedingly rare bird in the<br />

County”. Sclater, at Castle Eden, saw one there on 10 February 1876, only the third

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!