02.03.2013 Views

Topics in Current Chemistry

Topics in Current Chemistry

Topics in Current Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Electronic Spectroscopy and Photoreactivity of Transition Metal Complexes 149<br />

3.3<br />

Cyclometalated Complexes<br />

3.3.1<br />

Electronic Spectra of M(2-thienylpyrid<strong>in</strong>e)2 (M=Pd, Pt) Complexes:<br />

a CASSCF/CASPT2 Study<br />

Photo-chemical and photo-physical <strong>in</strong>vestigations based on highly resolved<br />

emission and excitation spectra of cyclometalated complexes [139, 141] revealed<br />

that the lowest excited states are Ligand Centred (LC) correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to p!p* excitations with a large degree of MLCT admixture <strong>in</strong> contrast to<br />

the compounds discussed <strong>in</strong> the previous sub-sections which are characterized<br />

by low-ly<strong>in</strong>g MLCT, SBLCT and MC states.<br />

A careful theoretical analysis based on CASSCF/CASPT2 calculations of<br />

transition energies and oscillator strengths of two cyclometalated complexes<br />

Pd(thpy) 2 and Pt(thpy) 2 conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g either Pd(II) or Pt(II) as the central metal<br />

coord<strong>in</strong>ated to two cis-conjugated C-protonated 2-(2-thienyl) pyrid<strong>in</strong>e<br />

(thpy Ÿ ) ligands (Scheme 8) has been reported [142]. The purpose of this<br />

Scheme 8<br />

study was an analysis of the excitation and emission spectra and the search<br />

for some trends on modify<strong>in</strong>g the metal centre. The calculated excitation energies<br />

to the low-ly<strong>in</strong>g triplet and s<strong>in</strong>glet states are reported <strong>in</strong> Table 5. The<br />

a 3 A 1 and a 3 B 2 states, almost purely LC with very limited MLCT contribution<br />

<strong>in</strong> Pd(thpy) 2 are about 1500 cm Ÿ1 lower for Pt(thpy) 2 (18,170 cm Ÿ1 ,<br />

18,830 cm Ÿ1 ) than for Pd(thpy) 2 (19,690 cm Ÿ1 , 19,960 cm Ÿ1 ), both be<strong>in</strong>g considerably<br />

lower than the calculated vertical excitation energies for the free<br />

thpy ligands (~23,000 cm Ÿ1 ). The calculated values are <strong>in</strong> perfect agreement<br />

with the experimental data which establish these states at 17,160 cm Ÿ1<br />

(Pt(thpy) 2) and 18,420 cm Ÿ1 (Pd(thpy) 2) [143, 144]. However, one <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

question which illustrates the complementarity s between experiments and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!