23.03.2013 Views

A CRITICAL BIOGRAPHY OF EDWIN JAMES BRADY - Mallacoota ...

A CRITICAL BIOGRAPHY OF EDWIN JAMES BRADY - Mallacoota ...

A CRITICAL BIOGRAPHY OF EDWIN JAMES BRADY - Mallacoota ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

115<br />

This interest in human behaviour, particularly in the mental realm, reaches its height<br />

when attempts are made to analyse the processes of thought which are involved in a<br />

particular action. It must be kept in mind however, that the psychology which Brady<br />

studied and showed deep interest I n was an infantile science in the 1890’s when<br />

many of these stories were written. Two examples of attempted analysis are “The<br />

Remarkable Confession of Martin Creswick” 1 and “Tasso’s Discovery: A<br />

Psychological Romance”. 2 Brady shows some grasp of psychological principles in<br />

his examination of the case of a man who suffers from amnesia for seven years.<br />

Three murders are committed during this period and his reactions on regaining his<br />

memory and finding about his own involvement are plumbed, although not very<br />

comprehensively. His confession, found after his suicide, brings a measure of unity to<br />

what has been three disjointed incidents. When considered in its period, it is an<br />

unusual theme and its treatment once again shows Brady’s concern with psychic<br />

phenomena.<br />

The second of the two stories attempts to examine the psychological processes<br />

involved in dreams, exemplifying how vivid happenings in life can carry over into<br />

one’s dreams and how the opposite is true- that dreams can be so realistic that they<br />

can constitute part of this existence. But as an example of the short story form it has<br />

too many of the deficiencies which Brady should have worked to remedy had his<br />

interest been more than passing one. It has a slow start, a rather anticlimactic ending,<br />

too much verbiage, descriptive detail and comment, an excess of authorial intrusion<br />

and a style far more discursive than the compressed, suggestive manner of the better<br />

short stories. As redeeming features it posses an ironic levity of approach which<br />

some readers would find appealing, a sensuous, journalistic language and a vividness<br />

and immediacy which Brady later found in the short stories of Katherine Mansfield.<br />

As with so many of his other fields of activity, Brady shows a promise in his early<br />

short stories which one would expect to flower into a considerable and satisfying<br />

proficiency. But this was not to be. Occasioned no doubt by the pressures of earning<br />

a living, there was a lack of sufficient discipline to bring about the needed<br />

improvement. The goal of perfection, attained at the cost of vast attention to detail<br />

and an exceedingly strong desire to excel in the particular field is never sufficiently<br />

strong in him. His is the classical case of the versatile man who spreads his talents so<br />

widely that in any one area of achievement they remain fairly thin, with initial<br />

promise unfulfilled.<br />

There are a few later short stories, but these show little advance on the early ones.<br />

Later attention is given more to articles and essays, especially to the political writing<br />

necessary on account of his connection with political journals. At a time when the<br />

short stories in The Bulletin were helping to forge a view of Australia as a unique and<br />

separate country which had and would continue to lead and existence apart from<br />

Britain, Brady’s stories could have aided this process. Because they were published<br />

in journals more obscure than the popular Bulletin, their contribution in this regard<br />

would have been minimal. It is not know definitely whether Brady ever submitted his<br />

short stories to The Bulletin. Certainly there is now no record of submission, no<br />

rejection slips (and he kept many of these in his papers) and no mention anywhere of<br />

his contributions to Archibald’s paper except through verse and the occasional article.<br />

1 The Bird-O-Freedom, 21.12.1895<br />

2 Ibid, 19.12.1894

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!