Journal of Film Preservation - FIAF
Journal of Film Preservation - FIAF
Journal of Film Preservation - FIAF
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Nederlands <strong>Film</strong>museum, Amsterdam.<br />
Cine Doré at the <strong>Film</strong>oteca española, Madrid.<br />
those titles familiar to them. A couple <strong>of</strong> years ago when we programmed<br />
an extensive Kurosawa series we were well aware that it would be Seven<br />
Samurai and Rashomon that collected large audience numbers and not, for<br />
example, the exciting contemporary films which Kurosawa directed from<br />
1946 to 1949, describing Japan’s paralysed condition following World War II.<br />
12 <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Film</strong> <strong>Preservation</strong> / 81 / 2009<br />
Several programmers relate that they try to enhance<br />
films they find <strong>of</strong> particular interest but which<br />
don’t appear in the “public canon” <strong>of</strong> important<br />
works. When Cinematheque Ontario presented<br />
a Jacques Demy series they gave considerable<br />
attention to the neglected Model Shop; while the<br />
Oslo cinematheque has attempted to remedy<br />
the Mona Lisa syndrome by giving selected noncanonized<br />
films more text and a larger picture in<br />
their published programme, which according to<br />
Kjell Runar Jenssen has sometimes been successful.<br />
A Commitment to the National <strong>Film</strong> Heritage<br />
Most cinematheques feel a special commitment<br />
to national film history and in some cases public<br />
resources and support is conditional upon the<br />
cinematheque prioritizing national films in their programme. At the<br />
same time, it is a subject which is being debated in several film museums<br />
and archives. Archive workers in particular<br />
emphasize that national art film be given<br />
consideration in the programming, no doubt<br />
due to the fact that many archives have a<br />
legal duty to collect and preserve national<br />
films. As Ge<strong>of</strong>f Andrew says: “Some see the BFI<br />
as the ‘Institute <strong>of</strong> British <strong>Film</strong>s’. I see the BFI as<br />
the ‘British Institute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Film</strong>s’ and believe that<br />
we have a duty to film art as a whole.” Each<br />
year Cinematheque Ontario programmes a<br />
series, “Canadian Top Ten”, which presents the<br />
ten best Canadian films selected by a large<br />
external jury. The series works as a festival,<br />
and the directors introduce the films, many <strong>of</strong><br />
which never received distribution.<br />
In Copenhagen it can be difficult to create an<br />
interest in retrospectives <strong>of</strong> Danish directors<br />
and actors, mostly because Danish films<br />
have been shown in the cinema and <strong>of</strong>ten several times on TV. Still, we<br />
sometimes try, even though we are well aware that except for the shows<br />
where the film artists themselves are present, the audience for these series<br />
is limited. Every third Thursday in the month we show a Danish film with<br />
English subtitles, for English-speaking Copenhageners. Furthermore, quite<br />
frequently we have independent events where we present an older Danish<br />
film together with an historical introduction. We also <strong>of</strong>ten show previews<br />
<strong>of</strong> new Danish films.<br />
Up until 2009, every January and February we annually screened the<br />
previous year’s Danish film premieres, partly out <strong>of</strong> a sense <strong>of</strong> a duty,