24.03.2013 Views

The Net Effect? - Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society

The Net Effect? - Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society

The Net Effect? - Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

y the (full-time) Galician fleet is estimated to<br />

be around 1.1 million per year (López et al.<br />

2003). <strong>The</strong>se findings also appear to be at<br />

odds with other recent surveys. For instance,<br />

a survey of cetacean bycatch in Galician fisheries<br />

conducted in 1998-1999 recorded no<br />

bycatch during 67 observed fishing trips<br />

(López et al. 2003). However, data from interviews<br />

with fishermen produced an estimated<br />

annual cetacean bycatch of 415 cetaceans per<br />

year in Galician offshore trawl fisheries <strong>and</strong> a<br />

further 332 in the trawl fishery on Gr<strong>and</strong><br />

Sole. <strong>The</strong> interviews also yielded numerous<br />

references to cetaceans being used for human<br />

consumption (69 out of 500 interviewees) <strong>and</strong><br />

use of cetaceans for bait, animal food <strong>and</strong> as a<br />

source of fat was also mentioned (López et al.<br />

2003). An earlier Spanish study, also using<br />

observers <strong>and</strong> interviews with fishermen, identified<br />

offshore pair trawling as the major cause<br />

of common dolphin mortality (Aguilar 1997).<br />

In this study, fishermen reported that during<br />

night-time fishing it was rare not to catch<br />

dolphins, usually between one <strong>and</strong> ten <strong>and</strong><br />

sometimes thirty or more. During 1996 <strong>and</strong><br />

1997, observers were present on four trips<br />

using pair trawls at night <strong>and</strong> in all cases<br />

common dolphins were caught, totalling eight<br />

individuals (Aguilar 1997).<br />

3.3 Bottom-set gillnets<br />

Gillnetting is a simple, passive form of<br />

fishing that involves the setting of sheets of<br />

netting suspended vertically in the water by<br />

way of a floatline at the top <strong>and</strong> a leadline at<br />

the bottom. Fish are caught by swimming<br />

into the net <strong>and</strong> becoming wedged within a<br />

mesh opening, or literally ‘gilled’ by the mesh<br />

catching behind the gill covers. Bottom-set<br />

gillnets are used to catch a wide variety of<br />

demersal species including cod, turbot, hake,<br />

saithe <strong>and</strong> dogfish. <strong>The</strong>re are several variations<br />

on this theme. Tangle nets have little or<br />

no flotation so that they are extremely slack,<br />

<strong>and</strong> are used to catch species such as flatfish<br />

<strong>and</strong> crustaceans, which are entangled rather<br />

than gilled. Trammel nets consist of three<br />

parallel sheets of netting, the middle sheet of<br />

which has a smaller mesh <strong>and</strong> is hung<br />

loosely, so that fish swim through the outer<br />

sheet <strong>and</strong> are caught in a pocket of the small<br />

mesh netting. All these nets are usually<br />

anchored so that they are located on or near<br />

the seabed. Driftnets are gillnets that are left<br />

to drift at or near the sea surface, sometimes<br />

attached to the boat at one end (driftnets are<br />

addressed in 3.4 below).<br />

Although gillnets have a long history, their<br />

use has increased massively since the introduction<br />

in the 1950s of nylon yarns <strong>and</strong> particularly<br />

monofilament netting, which<br />

increased their efficiency (Northridge et al.<br />

1991). <strong>The</strong> FAO <strong>and</strong> other organisations<br />

actively promoted the use of gillnets in<br />

coastal areas because of their low cost, ease<br />

of use <strong>and</strong> productivity, <strong>and</strong> they have<br />

became the most common type of fishing<br />

gear in coastal waters worldwide (Crespo &<br />

Hall 2001). Gillnets are regarded by fisheries<br />

managers as attractive because they can be<br />

very size-selective for the target fish.<br />

However, they can be very unselective at a<br />

species level, both for non-target fish <strong>and</strong> for<br />

other groups such as marine mammals, birds<br />

<strong>and</strong> turtles. <strong>The</strong> durability of nylon gillnets<br />

also means that when they are lost at sea<br />

(which frequently happens) they may<br />

continue to trap fish (ghost fishing) for an<br />

indeterminable period, posing an additional<br />

bycatch threat.<br />

<strong>The</strong> harbour porpoise, in particular, has been<br />

found to be acutely prone to incidental<br />

capture in bottom-set gillnets in the northeast<br />

Atlantic <strong>and</strong> many other regions<br />

throughout its range (see also 2.2.2).<br />

3.3.1 Danish bottom-set gillnets<br />

Denmark has a large bottom-set gillnetting<br />

fleet, operating largely in the North Sea <strong>and</strong><br />

also in the Kattegat <strong>and</strong> Skaggerak Seas <strong>and</strong><br />

into the Baltic Sea. <strong>The</strong> main fisheries<br />

targeted in the North Sea are for cod, caught<br />

in bottom-set nets <strong>and</strong> wreck nets (where<br />

gillnets are set over wrecks <strong>and</strong> rough<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Net</strong> <strong>Effect</strong>?<br />

A WDCS report for Greenpeace<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!