27.03.2013 Views

Candidate Support Pack - Scottish Qualifications Authority

Candidate Support Pack - Scottish Qualifications Authority

Candidate Support Pack - Scottish Qualifications Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.32<br />

Dryer death in Detroit<br />

Mr John McKinney, a 45-year-old worker, had<br />

been employed for three months at Palace<br />

Quality Services, Detroit.<br />

He was performing a routine maintenance on<br />

a dryer on the day of the accident.<br />

Eyewitnesses informed the Homicide Division<br />

of the Detriot Police Department that Mr<br />

McKinney had been working on the discharge<br />

side of the dryer at the time of the accident.<br />

According to the medical examiner’s office,<br />

Mr McKinney had suffered blunt trauma<br />

injuries to the head and face and most likely<br />

died immediately. The Homicide Division<br />

ruled the death an accident.<br />

The Michigan department of Consumer and<br />

Industry Services — the state’s Occupational<br />

Safety and Health <strong>Authority</strong> (OSHA) —<br />

launched an investigation into the cause of the<br />

accident. Its finding will determine whether it<br />

should cite the management of the plant for<br />

violations of OSHA’s safety regulations.<br />

GC8N 22 — Laundry Operations Level 2<br />

Courtesy of Laundry and Cleaning News, published September 1997<br />

■ US: An operator was killed after being trapped inside a dryer at a detroit laundry,<br />

Richard Neil reports<br />

“Nothing like this has ever happened in our<br />

115 years in business,” said Mr Don McKnight,<br />

owner of what has long been a family business.<br />

He speculated that Mr McKinney “did not<br />

observe OSHA’s lockout-tagout regulations.<br />

Everything else is just conjecture,” he stated.<br />

Records in the Michigan OSHA office<br />

indicated that the laundry had received citations<br />

for two previous accidents.<br />

In 1983, it was fined for failing to guard its<br />

conveyors. In 1988 the fine was for negligence<br />

in guarding its electrical systems, lack of<br />

guarding to chains and sprockets, a failure to<br />

guard its sling system and violations involving<br />

folders.<br />

During a routine safety inspection in August<br />

1996, Palace Quality Services was fined £8400<br />

for various violations of OSHA safety<br />

regulations — including a rule governing<br />

access to confined spaces. It later agreed to pay<br />

£3000 in an informal settlement.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!