28.03.2013 Views

Government of India Volume I: Analysis and Recommendations

Government of India Volume I: Analysis and Recommendations

Government of India Volume I: Analysis and Recommendations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PUBLIC DEBT MANAGEMENT<br />

Table <strong>of</strong> <strong>Recommendations</strong> 12.3 Operationalising agency role with independent objectives<br />

The combination <strong>of</strong> being an agency with independent objectives <strong>and</strong> agent <strong>of</strong> <strong>Government</strong> has operational implications<br />

<strong>of</strong> the following nature:<br />

1. While the public debt management agency will always act on instructions from the Central <strong>Government</strong>,<br />

the draft Code should allow it to have the discretion to decide on the details <strong>of</strong> how it implements those<br />

instructions in accordance with its objectives.<br />

2. Throughout the process <strong>of</strong> implementing the instructions it receives, the public debt management agency<br />

must ensure that the objectives are met.<br />

3. If, however, the instructions do not enable its objectives to be met, the public debt management agency must<br />

have the opportunity to place its objections to the instructions on record.<br />

4. This should be done through m<strong>and</strong>ating a regular consultation <strong>and</strong> feedback process between the agency<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Central <strong>Government</strong>, which should take place throughout the agency’s exercise <strong>of</strong> its functions.<br />

5. When issuing instructions, the Central <strong>Government</strong> must be obliged to consider the views <strong>of</strong> the public debt<br />

management agency, <strong>and</strong> would have full knowledge <strong>of</strong> the objectives <strong>of</strong> the agency as laid down in the draft<br />

Code.<br />

6. If there is a disagreement between the two, the public debt management agency would be statutorily bound<br />

to meet the instructions, but through the consultation <strong>and</strong> feedback process, it would have placed on record<br />

its inability to meet its objective.<br />

7. The accountability mechanism – routed through the Central <strong>Government</strong> <strong>and</strong> eventually to Parliament –<br />

would take into consideration all the efforts made by the public debt management agency with regard to<br />

achieving its objective, <strong>and</strong> the objections, if any, it would have already placed on record to this effect.<br />

Table <strong>of</strong> <strong>Recommendations</strong> 12.4 Objectives <strong>of</strong> the public debt management agency<br />

Table 12.1 states that the draft Code must create a public debt management agency that functions with independent<br />

goals <strong>and</strong> objectives, while remaining an agent <strong>of</strong> the Central <strong>Government</strong>. Accordingly, the draft Code charges the<br />

public debt management agency with the objective <strong>of</strong> minimising the cost <strong>of</strong> raising <strong>and</strong> servicing public debt over the<br />

long-term within an acceptable level <strong>of</strong> risk at all times. This will guide all <strong>of</strong> its key functions, which include managing<br />

the public debt, cash <strong>and</strong> contingent liabilities <strong>of</strong> Central <strong>Government</strong>, <strong>and</strong> related activities.<br />

12.3. Objectives <strong>and</strong> functions <strong>of</strong> the public debt management<br />

agency<br />

Table 12.4 sets out the objectives <strong>of</strong> the public debt management agency. It is important<br />

to recognise the tension between the short-term <strong>and</strong> the long-term. A public debt manager<br />

can always obtain gains in the short run through tactical decisions which appear to<br />

be expedient or immediately yield gains <strong>of</strong> a few basis points. But these tactics could well<br />

be damaging in the long run, if they reduce the confidence <strong>of</strong> market participants. Hence,<br />

the objective <strong>of</strong> the public debt management agency must be clearly defined in the draft<br />

Code as undertaking those actions which minimise the cost <strong>of</strong> borrowing <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Government</strong><br />

in the long run. This should rule out an array <strong>of</strong> short-sighted tactical actions, such<br />

as exploiting informational asymmetry against market participants, exploiting regulatory<br />

constraints faced by market participants, <strong>and</strong> so on.<br />

The key functions <strong>of</strong> the public debt management agency would be to undertake<br />

public debt <strong>and</strong> cash management for the Central <strong>Government</strong>. In addition to these, the<br />

various functions <strong>of</strong> the public debt management agency include the management <strong>of</strong><br />

contingent liabilities, research <strong>and</strong> information, <strong>and</strong> the fostering <strong>of</strong> a liquid <strong>and</strong> efficient<br />

market for <strong>Government</strong> securities. These functions are summarised in Table 12.5.<br />

12.3.1. Public debt management<br />

The public debt management agency should advise the Central <strong>Government</strong> on the composition<br />

<strong>of</strong> debt instruments including the proportion <strong>of</strong> domestic to foreign debt instruments,<br />

alongside a thorough debt-sustainability analysis. Given the rising fiscal needs <strong>of</strong><br />

114 FINANCIAL SECTOR LEGISLATIVE REFORMS COMMISSION

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!