Government of India Volume I: Analysis and Recommendations
Government of India Volume I: Analysis and Recommendations
Government of India Volume I: Analysis and Recommendations
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PUBLIC DEBT MANAGEMENT<br />
Table <strong>of</strong> <strong>Recommendations</strong> 12.3 Operationalising agency role with independent objectives<br />
The combination <strong>of</strong> being an agency with independent objectives <strong>and</strong> agent <strong>of</strong> <strong>Government</strong> has operational implications<br />
<strong>of</strong> the following nature:<br />
1. While the public debt management agency will always act on instructions from the Central <strong>Government</strong>,<br />
the draft Code should allow it to have the discretion to decide on the details <strong>of</strong> how it implements those<br />
instructions in accordance with its objectives.<br />
2. Throughout the process <strong>of</strong> implementing the instructions it receives, the public debt management agency<br />
must ensure that the objectives are met.<br />
3. If, however, the instructions do not enable its objectives to be met, the public debt management agency must<br />
have the opportunity to place its objections to the instructions on record.<br />
4. This should be done through m<strong>and</strong>ating a regular consultation <strong>and</strong> feedback process between the agency<br />
<strong>and</strong> the Central <strong>Government</strong>, which should take place throughout the agency’s exercise <strong>of</strong> its functions.<br />
5. When issuing instructions, the Central <strong>Government</strong> must be obliged to consider the views <strong>of</strong> the public debt<br />
management agency, <strong>and</strong> would have full knowledge <strong>of</strong> the objectives <strong>of</strong> the agency as laid down in the draft<br />
Code.<br />
6. If there is a disagreement between the two, the public debt management agency would be statutorily bound<br />
to meet the instructions, but through the consultation <strong>and</strong> feedback process, it would have placed on record<br />
its inability to meet its objective.<br />
7. The accountability mechanism – routed through the Central <strong>Government</strong> <strong>and</strong> eventually to Parliament –<br />
would take into consideration all the efforts made by the public debt management agency with regard to<br />
achieving its objective, <strong>and</strong> the objections, if any, it would have already placed on record to this effect.<br />
Table <strong>of</strong> <strong>Recommendations</strong> 12.4 Objectives <strong>of</strong> the public debt management agency<br />
Table 12.1 states that the draft Code must create a public debt management agency that functions with independent<br />
goals <strong>and</strong> objectives, while remaining an agent <strong>of</strong> the Central <strong>Government</strong>. Accordingly, the draft Code charges the<br />
public debt management agency with the objective <strong>of</strong> minimising the cost <strong>of</strong> raising <strong>and</strong> servicing public debt over the<br />
long-term within an acceptable level <strong>of</strong> risk at all times. This will guide all <strong>of</strong> its key functions, which include managing<br />
the public debt, cash <strong>and</strong> contingent liabilities <strong>of</strong> Central <strong>Government</strong>, <strong>and</strong> related activities.<br />
12.3. Objectives <strong>and</strong> functions <strong>of</strong> the public debt management<br />
agency<br />
Table 12.4 sets out the objectives <strong>of</strong> the public debt management agency. It is important<br />
to recognise the tension between the short-term <strong>and</strong> the long-term. A public debt manager<br />
can always obtain gains in the short run through tactical decisions which appear to<br />
be expedient or immediately yield gains <strong>of</strong> a few basis points. But these tactics could well<br />
be damaging in the long run, if they reduce the confidence <strong>of</strong> market participants. Hence,<br />
the objective <strong>of</strong> the public debt management agency must be clearly defined in the draft<br />
Code as undertaking those actions which minimise the cost <strong>of</strong> borrowing <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Government</strong><br />
in the long run. This should rule out an array <strong>of</strong> short-sighted tactical actions, such<br />
as exploiting informational asymmetry against market participants, exploiting regulatory<br />
constraints faced by market participants, <strong>and</strong> so on.<br />
The key functions <strong>of</strong> the public debt management agency would be to undertake<br />
public debt <strong>and</strong> cash management for the Central <strong>Government</strong>. In addition to these, the<br />
various functions <strong>of</strong> the public debt management agency include the management <strong>of</strong><br />
contingent liabilities, research <strong>and</strong> information, <strong>and</strong> the fostering <strong>of</strong> a liquid <strong>and</strong> efficient<br />
market for <strong>Government</strong> securities. These functions are summarised in Table 12.5.<br />
12.3.1. Public debt management<br />
The public debt management agency should advise the Central <strong>Government</strong> on the composition<br />
<strong>of</strong> debt instruments including the proportion <strong>of</strong> domestic to foreign debt instruments,<br />
alongside a thorough debt-sustainability analysis. Given the rising fiscal needs <strong>of</strong><br />
114 FINANCIAL SECTOR LEGISLATIVE REFORMS COMMISSION