02.04.2013 Views

The impact of urban groundwater upon surface water - eTheses ...

The impact of urban groundwater upon surface water - eTheses ...

The impact of urban groundwater upon surface water - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GROUNDWATER FLUX<br />

changes in concentration could also be due to systematic error - if, for example, the sample<br />

points were regularly visited but at times corresponding to different stages in the daily<br />

sewage discharge cycle as it propagated down river. <strong>The</strong> dry-weather data show a fall in mean<br />

concentration at Perry Barr for Cd, Cu(total), Cr, Pb and Zn showing that, despite the increased<br />

dilution caused by wet weather, the mass flux is greater, because wet weather inputs and<br />

increased flow velocities carry more suspended material. <strong>The</strong> concentrations <strong>of</strong> NH4,<br />

Cu(dissolved), Ni and total hardness increase because <strong>of</strong> less dilution from run-<strong>of</strong>f. Similar trends<br />

are observed between the Saltley composite and dry weather averages but the change is not as<br />

great.<br />

<strong>The</strong> discharge used to calculate the mass flux was derived using mean values for baseflow<br />

discharge at Bescot plus known mean discharges. In addition to this the average baseflow<br />

increment <strong>of</strong> 3.6 m 3 d -1 per metre <strong>of</strong> channel was added over the 10.3 km from Bescot to Perry<br />

Barr and the further 7.4 km to Saltley. For comparative purposes, readings from the 22/5/01<br />

discharge measurements were also used to calculate the mass flux. Both sets <strong>of</strong> discharge<br />

values used show a similar increase <strong>of</strong> 17-22% but the mass flux is much lower for the<br />

22/5/01 and it is unknown which, if either, is more appropriate. <strong>The</strong> mass flux reveals a<br />

complex story that is not immediately obvious from consideration <strong>of</strong> the concentration data<br />

alone. Some <strong>of</strong> the determinands using the 22/5/01 discharge data, Cd and Cu(dissolved) and<br />

Cu(total), exhibit an overall reduction in mass flux which may be due to sorption or settling <strong>of</strong><br />

particulates. NH4 shows an increase <strong>of</strong> between 2 and 21 kgd -1 even though some losses will<br />

have occurred by the ready oxidation <strong>of</strong> NH4 to NO3. <strong>The</strong> most significant increases in metal<br />

mass flux are for Zn (2.5-5 kgd -1 , Ni 0.5-2 kgd -1 and Cr 0.5-0.8 kgd -1 ). It is not known<br />

whether the additional mass flux is in dissolved form but it is not unreasonable to assume that<br />

334

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!