Concerning an SSPX Dossier on Sedevacantism - Novus Ordo Watch
Concerning an SSPX Dossier on Sedevacantism - Novus Ordo Watch
Concerning an SSPX Dossier on Sedevacantism - Novus Ordo Watch
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
legally admissible excuse; it would also be necessary that “no subterfuge” could possibly<br />
c<strong>on</strong>ceal it.<br />
a) Against Fr. Boulet’s first point, in which he cites the divine law, The First See c<str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g> be judged by no<br />
<strong>on</strong>e, we may c<strong>on</strong>sider the Decretal Si papa, <str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g>d the commentary up<strong>on</strong> it of Innocent III, who<br />
famously taught as follows.<br />
He [the Rom<str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g> P<strong>on</strong>tiff] c<str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g> be judged by men, or rather c<str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g> be shown to be already judged,<br />
if for example he should wither away into heresy; because he who does not believe is<br />
already judged.” (Sermo 4); see Decreta Grati<str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g>i, III, d. 40, c.6. 16<br />
And the Decretal itself reads,<br />
“Let no mortal being have the audacity to reprim<str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g>d a Pope <strong>on</strong> account of his faults, for he<br />
whose duty it is to judge all men c<str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g>not be judged by <str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g>ybody, unless he should be called to<br />
17<br />
task for having deviated from the faith.”<br />
The Abbé de N<str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g>tes provides a parallel text from the same Rom<str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g> P<strong>on</strong>tiff, as follows.<br />
“The great Innocent III comments <strong>on</strong> this, applying it humbly to himself: ‘For me the faith is<br />
so necessary that, whereas for other sins my <strong>on</strong>ly judge is God, for the slightest sin<br />
committed in the matter of the faith I could be judged by the Church.’ (Serm. C<strong>on</strong>secrat.<br />
P<strong>on</strong>tif. Rom., P. L. CCXVII, col. 656).<br />
Nothing turns <strong>on</strong> the point, but it appears to be inaccurate to say that no act of Paul VI’s, John Paul<br />
II’s, or Benedict XVI’s could be notorious with a notoriety of law, <strong>on</strong> the grounds that nobody may<br />
judge “the Pope.” For if <str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g>y of the three were guilty of public heresy he would lose his papal status<br />
by the very fact, <str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g>d could therefore be declared a heretic by <str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g> imperfect general council. This<br />
would render his heresy notorious with a notoriety of law.<br />
16 Quoted by Mgr. G. V<str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g> Noort, Dogmatic Theology, Vol. II, "Christ's Church" - Mercier Press, 1958, p. 310.<br />
17 Ia, dist. XL, c. 6, Si papa; ex Gestis B<strong>on</strong>ifacii martyris.<br />
32