04.04.2013 Views

Concerning an SSPX Dossier on Sedevacantism - Novus Ordo Watch

Concerning an SSPX Dossier on Sedevacantism - Novus Ordo Watch

Concerning an SSPX Dossier on Sedevacantism - Novus Ordo Watch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

legally admissible excuse; it would also be necessary that “no subterfuge” could possibly<br />

c<strong>on</strong>ceal it.<br />

a) Against Fr. Boulet’s first point, in which he cites the divine law, The First See c<str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g> be judged by no<br />

<strong>on</strong>e, we may c<strong>on</strong>sider the Decretal Si papa, <str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g>d the commentary up<strong>on</strong> it of Innocent III, who<br />

famously taught as follows.<br />

He [the Rom<str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g> P<strong>on</strong>tiff] c<str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g> be judged by men, or rather c<str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g> be shown to be already judged,<br />

if for example he should wither away into heresy; because he who does not believe is<br />

already judged.” (Sermo 4); see Decreta Grati<str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g>i, III, d. 40, c.6. 16<br />

And the Decretal itself reads,<br />

“Let no mortal being have the audacity to reprim<str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g>d a Pope <strong>on</strong> account of his faults, for he<br />

whose duty it is to judge all men c<str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g>not be judged by <str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g>ybody, unless he should be called to<br />

17<br />

task for having deviated from the faith.”<br />

The Abbé de N<str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g>tes provides a parallel text from the same Rom<str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g> P<strong>on</strong>tiff, as follows.<br />

“The great Innocent III comments <strong>on</strong> this, applying it humbly to himself: ‘For me the faith is<br />

so necessary that, whereas for other sins my <strong>on</strong>ly judge is God, for the slightest sin<br />

committed in the matter of the faith I could be judged by the Church.’ (Serm. C<strong>on</strong>secrat.<br />

P<strong>on</strong>tif. Rom., P. L. CCXVII, col. 656).<br />

Nothing turns <strong>on</strong> the point, but it appears to be inaccurate to say that no act of Paul VI’s, John Paul<br />

II’s, or Benedict XVI’s could be notorious with a notoriety of law, <strong>on</strong> the grounds that nobody may<br />

judge “the Pope.” For if <str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g>y of the three were guilty of public heresy he would lose his papal status<br />

by the very fact, <str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g>d could therefore be declared a heretic by <str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g> imperfect general council. This<br />

would render his heresy notorious with a notoriety of law.<br />

16 Quoted by Mgr. G. V<str<strong>on</strong>g>an</str<strong>on</strong>g> Noort, Dogmatic Theology, Vol. II, "Christ's Church" - Mercier Press, 1958, p. 310.<br />

17 Ia, dist. XL, c. 6, Si papa; ex Gestis B<strong>on</strong>ifacii martyris.<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!