05.04.2013 Views

hungarian studies - EPA - Országos Széchényi Könyvtár

hungarian studies - EPA - Országos Széchényi Könyvtár

hungarian studies - EPA - Országos Széchényi Könyvtár

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SOME QUESTIONS ON HUNGARIAN-SOVIET RELATIONS 19<br />

investment, out of which almost 50% went to industry (including construction)<br />

and only 14% to agriculture. 91 This percentage of national income invested in<br />

Hungary was higher than the rates of investment under the first Five-Year Plans in<br />

Bulgaria (19,6), Czechoslovakia (22,3), Poland (21,6), or for the Soviet Union<br />

(21%) between 1946 and 1950. The share of industry in investment was also higher<br />

in Hungary than in the abovementioned people's democracies and the Soviet Union.<br />

The same was true for the share of heavy industry and construction in all<br />

industrial investments, which was over 90% in Hungary, 83% in Bulgaria, 78% in<br />

Czechoslovakia and 75% in Poland during the same period. 92 Just as in the Soviet<br />

Union beginning in the early 1930s resources were diverted from agriculture to<br />

industry. This was done by decreasing the share of the national resources spent on<br />

agricultural development, by drastically reducing the price paid for agricultural<br />

products, coupled to an artificial increase in the price of the industrial products<br />

that were sold to the agricultural sector. In this way the government killed two<br />

birds with one stone. It carried out its economic program and made progress in the<br />

liquidation of the peasantry as a social class. The impact of the government's<br />

economic policy on the standard of living was disastrous. In 1952 the price index<br />

of consumer goods was 166% higher than that of capital goods. The price of<br />

clothing was seventeen times, that of foodstuffs twelve times higher than in 1938.<br />

At the same time services were cheaper. The purchasing power of the Hungarian<br />

forint diminished by 40% between 1946 and 1949, and by another 27% until 1955.<br />

The year 1951 saw the introduction of rationing for meat, bread, lard, sugar, flour<br />

and soap. This was lifted after seven months, but with a simultaneous increase of<br />

prices by 40% and a general pay rise of only 20%. Chiefly due to the compulsory<br />

deliveries, the peasantry's income actually went down as compared to the pre-war<br />

period. During the years between 1949 and 1953 the level of consumption for all<br />

important foodstuffs, save for wheat and sugar, was lower than in the last year of<br />

peace. The deterioration of the quality of consumer goods added another 10% to<br />

the consumer price index, which in 1955 was 35% higher than at the beginning of<br />

the decade. 93 The Poles experienced similar hardships. In Poland by 1953 the<br />

level of meat and sugar consumption had fallen below that of 1949. 94 Hungary,<br />

which had been one of the continent's major exporters of wheat, now had to import<br />

this formerly abundant commodity from the Soviet Union and elsewhere<br />

because its own production was used to service the country's ever growing foreign<br />

debt. Hence in January 1956 the Hungarian leadership had to turn to the<br />

USSR for the shipment of 100 thousand tons of wheat, while in September 1956<br />

another 350 thousand tons were requested for 1957. Such requests could only<br />

increase Hungary's subordinated position vis-à-vis its hegemonic neighbor. Because<br />

of the acute shortage of wheat extraordinary, terroristic methods were employed<br />

to curb consumption. In January 1953, for example, a certain Ferenc Reisz<br />

was sentenced to two years in prison and the confiscation of a thousand forints for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!