05.04.2013 Views

Midland Churches: A History of the Congregations on - General ...

Midland Churches: A History of the Congregations on - General ...

Midland Churches: A History of the Congregations on - General ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

William Allard says-<br />

Here, in 1715, some devastati<strong>on</strong> was committed by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> mob, in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> room<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>n used.<br />

Two years afterwards, during Peach's ministry, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> first meeting-house<br />

was built ; not in a secluded spot, but in an open place, still known as<br />

'Old Meeting Road.' It was more str<strong>on</strong>gly built than many o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

that period, and was adorned with-<br />

moulded and even carved woodwork.<br />

The year, 1717, was impressed <strong>on</strong> two bricks, which are still preserved<br />

in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> wall, at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> entrance to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> heating chamber <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> present building,<br />

whilst <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> year was also scratched <strong>on</strong> a pane in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> western gallery<br />

window <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> old building, toge<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> name <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a man living at<br />

Bilst<strong>on</strong>, with eighteenth century date.<br />

George Doughty ministered here for twelve years (1720-1732), he being<br />

elected in place <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Mr. Ne7zshuZ, a y021ng 1ni7zister <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Deaa Row, Cheshire, who<br />

was inyited to succeed Mr. Peach, but denfh jprezjel~ted his settlenteut here.++ There<br />

was never a Henshal, 71iinister <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Dean Row, though <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re are still families<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> that name <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re. Probably he was a licentiate. When Doughty removed<br />

to Burt<strong>on</strong>-<strong>on</strong>-Trent a uni<strong>on</strong> was made between <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Coseley society<br />

and that <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nei~ Meeting,' in RfIoor Street, Birmingham.<br />

Samuel Bourn's requisiti<strong>on</strong> had been signed by 111 members from<br />

Coseiey, and by 87 from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Birmingham society. By his exerti<strong>on</strong>s, during<br />

his very active ministry at Coseley,-<br />

an estate was purchased for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> minister and charity school,<br />

which was <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>n founded.<br />

From Dr. Toulmin's Mertioirs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Rev. Sa7t~uel Bo~riz we see <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> extent<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> oppositi<strong>on</strong> he encountered from members <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Established Church<br />

in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> parish. He sustained two trials at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Stafford Quarter Sessi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

originating from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir hostility ; in both, however, he was successful. So<strong>on</strong><br />

afterwards, in December, 1728, he received an order from John Ward and<br />

R. Sedgwick, justices <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> peace at Wolverhampt<strong>on</strong>, who tried to remove<br />

him to his last legal settlement, under <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> pretext that he was likely to<br />

become chargeable to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> parish ; and alleging that he had icti-uded into<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> parish <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Sedgley without complying with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> laws in such cases-<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

"Scott MSS.<br />

place <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> his last settlement being Adlingt<strong>on</strong>, in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> parish <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Standish,<br />

in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> county Palatine <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Lancaster-and requiring him to depart, with<br />

his wife and family, before <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 4th <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> followiilg m<strong>on</strong>th, or o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rwise<br />

bring a certificate, showing that he was a parishi<strong>on</strong>er. These proceedings<br />

called forth a dignified and indignant protest from him, and in a letter,<br />

dated 27 December, 1728, he says :-<br />

I caliile i~zto tAe parish apo7z <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> z/nani?jzozrs ifzvitnti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a nu~?zerous<br />

co~zg~egnti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Proteskant dissenters, which i/zz~jit~i207~ - zuas slgaed by<br />

abozle a hu?zdred pers<strong>on</strong>s, many <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>m szrbstatitial yeouzen, farnzers,<br />

and trades~nen, and i~zost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>~~z inhnbil'ants <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> parish, mzd as this<br />

is agreeable to tAe niost pri~)zitlire =lay <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> nlinisters a7zd bishops <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

settling with a pecjle, so I take it to be as h<strong>on</strong>oz./rable a way as any<br />

t/y athich any clergynian in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> courzty came into hZj present settlemelzt.<br />

Bourn forwarded a certificate which satisfied <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> magistrates as to his<br />

legal right to dwell in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> parish. Many friends in Birmingham sympathised<br />

with him in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> persecuti<strong>on</strong>s to which he had been subjected, and raised a<br />

subscripti<strong>on</strong> to defray <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> expenses which he had incurred in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> various<br />

trials. \<br />

He c<strong>on</strong>tinued to labour actively for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> religious welfare <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> his c<strong>on</strong>gre-<br />

gati<strong>on</strong>s until Sunday, 17 March, 1754, when he was suddenly stricken with<br />

paralysis whilst in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> pulpit at Coseley, and died <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> following Friday.<br />

William Edwards, who became minister here in 1761, at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> termina-.<br />

ti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong> between <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Coseley and New Meeting societies,<br />

appears as <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> petiti<strong>on</strong>ing ministers <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1772-3. Apparently <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re<br />

was no relati<strong>on</strong>ship between him and John Edwards, Dr. Priestley's<br />

immediate successor at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> New Meeting.<br />

Richard Amner left Coseley, about <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1794, and devoted him-<br />

self to study in Hincliley ; he became a c<strong>on</strong>tributor to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Gentlenratv's<br />

Magazine.<br />

In its early years <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> r'M<strong>on</strong>th& Mdztifrg (founded in 1782, its first regular<br />

assembling being at Coseley, <strong>on</strong> 4 June, <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> that year) exercised<br />

Presbyterial functi<strong>on</strong>s, and <strong>on</strong> 11 October, 1796, Samuel Parker was, at<br />

Coseley, ordained as a Christia;~ nzi7zister. H'. Proctor i~ztrodz~ced f& serzrice with<br />

Prayer, a7zd reading <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> .Ycr@Lzrres; Rev. Samuel Grzfiths ashed some p.r/esti<strong>on</strong>s,<br />

and prayed a genernl and O~ctin,ifl'~~z Prayer; Rev. Radclzfe Scholejeld deliztel-ed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!