10.04.2013 Views

The Callans and McClarys, by John Edward Callan - Callanworld

The Callans and McClarys, by John Edward Callan - Callanworld

The Callans and McClarys, by John Edward Callan - Callanworld

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!

Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.

<strong>The</strong> <strong><strong>Callan</strong>s</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>McClarys</strong><br />

Chapter 4.<br />

Our Irish Cousins<br />

No direct descendants of<br />

Philip <strong>and</strong> Rose (Boylan) <strong>Callan</strong>,<br />

our descendant line, currently<br />

live in or near Coolkill. All of<br />

their children left Irel<strong>and</strong> for<br />

America <strong>by</strong> 1890 <strong>and</strong> there is no<br />

evidence known that any of their<br />

descendants returned to live in<br />

Irel<strong>and</strong>.<br />

We may, however, have<br />

distant <strong>Callan</strong> descendants still<br />

living in the Coolkill area. Philip<br />

<strong>Callan</strong>, who died in 1846 in<br />

Coolkill, had three siblings, all of<br />

whom may have had children.<br />

Descendants of these siblings<br />

may still be there. Additionally,<br />

there were other <strong>Callan</strong> families<br />

living in Coolkill in the early to<br />

mid-1800s. Mindful that Coolkill<br />

was only 427 acres in size, this<br />

close proximity of the <strong>Callan</strong><br />

families suggests that a blood<br />

relationship may have existed<br />

amongst one or more of the<br />

other <strong>Callan</strong> families. <strong>The</strong> data,<br />

in fact, support this. Let’s try to<br />

shed some light on how these<br />

<strong>Callan</strong> relationships may have<br />

existed <strong>and</strong> comment on the<br />

prospects for finding descendants<br />

of these early relatives<br />

living there today.<br />

Widow Widow Widow Widow Widow Rose Rose Rose Rose Rose <strong>Callan</strong>’s <strong>Callan</strong>’s <strong>Callan</strong>’s <strong>Callan</strong>’s <strong>Callan</strong>’s<br />

family family family family family of of of of of 1821. 1821. 1821. 1821. 1821. <strong>The</strong> 1821<br />

Census of Coolkill shows that<br />

Philip <strong>Callan</strong> had three siblings,<br />

James, Ellenor <strong>and</strong> Catherine.<br />

Author Luke <strong>Callan</strong>, in his book<br />

(p. 106), identifies a gr<strong>and</strong>uncle,<br />

Shamus. Shamus is old Irish for<br />

James. Shamus is likely Philip’s<br />

sibling James recorded in the<br />

1821 Census. This James would<br />

be Luke’s gr<strong>and</strong>uncle. Unfortunately,<br />

Luke reveals little about<br />

the descendants of Shamus. He<br />

does mention that Shamus had a<br />

daughter, “Big Ann” <strong>Callan</strong>, who<br />

married a Frank Reilly. Luke’s<br />

writings suggest that Big Ann<br />

died before she had children.<br />

Descendants of Philip’s siblings,<br />

Ellenor <strong>and</strong> Catherine <strong>Callan</strong>,<br />

could still be in the Coolkill area,<br />

but not knowing if they ever<br />

married, we may never know.<br />

James James James James James Callen Callen Callen Callen Callen family family family family family of of of of of<br />

1821. 1821. 1821. 1821. 1821. This James Callen of<br />

Coolkill may have been a<br />

~ 20 ~<br />

brother of the deceased husb<strong>and</strong><br />

of the widow Rose <strong>Callan</strong> of<br />

1821. If so, his children <strong>and</strong><br />

those of widow Rose would have<br />

been first cousins. In fact, there<br />

are two instances in the research<br />

literature that strongly suggest<br />

that a cousin relationship did<br />

exist between descendants of the<br />

2 families. <strong>The</strong> first instance<br />

involves James Callen’s daughter<br />

Anne <strong>and</strong> the second instance<br />

involves James Callen’s son,<br />

Peter. <strong>The</strong> logic of the analysis<br />

that follows attempts to show that<br />

Anne <strong>and</strong> Peter were first cousins<br />

to the children of widow<br />

Rose <strong>Callan</strong>, our <strong><strong>Callan</strong>s</strong>, <strong>and</strong>,<br />

consequently, their father James<br />

Callen of 1821 was a brother of<br />

widow Rose’s deceased husb<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Anne Anne <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Callan</strong> of of of 1821<br />

1821<br />

Widow Rose <strong>Callan</strong> of<br />

1821 had a gr<strong>and</strong>son, Father<br />

James <strong>Callan</strong>, who served in the<br />

gold rush l<strong>and</strong>s of California<br />

from 1861 to 1887. According to<br />

a 1946 book on the pioneering<br />

priest’s of California, Hallowed Hallowed Hallowed Hallowed Hallowed<br />

Were Were Were Were Were <strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong> Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Dust Dust Dust Dust Dust Trails, Trails Trails Trails Trails <strong>by</strong><br />

Henry L. Walsh, S.J., Father<br />

<strong>Callan</strong> was joined in 1864 <strong>by</strong> a<br />

“cousin” from County Cavan,<br />

Father Charles M. Lynch.<br />

<strong>The</strong> old records at All<br />

Hallows College in Dublin,<br />

where Father Lynch studied for<br />

the priesthood, list his parents as<br />

Patrick Lynch <strong>and</strong> Anne Anne Anne Anne Anne <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Callan</strong> <strong>Callan</strong><br />

who lived near Coolkill. It<br />

appears, therefore, that the<br />

cousin relationship between the<br />

two priests derived from Anne<br />

<strong>Callan</strong>. <strong>The</strong> two priests could not<br />

have been first cousins since that<br />

would have required Father<br />

<strong>Callan</strong>’s father, Philip <strong>Callan</strong>, to<br />

have had a sister, Anne, which<br />

he didn’t. <strong>The</strong> 1821 Census<br />

shows that Philip’s sisters were<br />

named Ellenor <strong>and</strong> Catherine.<br />

So Father <strong>Callan</strong>’s cousin relationship<br />

with Father Lynch had<br />

to come from another branch of<br />

<strong><strong>Callan</strong>s</strong>, a family who had a<br />

young daughter Anne in 1821.<br />

<strong>The</strong> 1821 James Callen<br />

family in Coolkill seems to<br />

match that requirement. It is the<br />

only <strong>Callan</strong> (Callen) family in<br />

Coolkill that shows a daughter,<br />

Anne. She, at age 14 in 1821,<br />

would have been 35 years old in<br />

1842, the birth year of Father<br />

Charles Lynch. If this is so,<br />

Fathers Lynch <strong>and</strong> <strong>Callan</strong> would<br />

have been second cousins <strong>and</strong><br />

Anne’s father, James, would have<br />

been a brother of our widow<br />

Rose <strong>Callan</strong>’s husb<strong>and</strong>.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is one other <strong>Callan</strong><br />

family identified in the 1821<br />

Census as having a daughter<br />

Anne. This is the family of<br />

Michael <strong>and</strong> Catherine <strong>Callan</strong><br />

living in the Townl<strong>and</strong> of<br />

Mullycastle, which is adjacent to<br />

Coolkill. <strong>The</strong>ir daughter Anne is<br />

12 years old in 1821, certainly<br />

qualified, chronologically, to<br />

have been the mother of Father<br />

Charles Lynch. Other children<br />

of Michael <strong>and</strong> Catherine <strong>Callan</strong><br />

were, Molly (24), Patrick (22),<br />

Rose (20), Michael (16), Philip<br />

(6) <strong>and</strong> what appears to be a set<br />

of 8-year-old twins, <strong>John</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

Bridget. It may be that this family

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!