Arūnas Diškus - VPU biblioteka - Vilniaus pedagoginis universitetas
Arūnas Diškus - VPU biblioteka - Vilniaus pedagoginis universitetas
Arūnas Diškus - VPU biblioteka - Vilniaus pedagoginis universitetas
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Phylogeny<br />
Morphological or trophic differences among tischeriids have prompted the<br />
erection of a few sections or species-groups within the family. Five sections have been<br />
designated in the Nearctic fauna by Braun (1972). These were not followed (at least<br />
in most cases) by workers on the European fauna. Until recently all known tischeriid<br />
species in the world were treated as belonging to a single genus (i. e., Tischeria Zeller,<br />
1839). However, the monotypic concept of the family was contradicted by Leraut<br />
(1993), who erected a new genus Emmetia. Our personal studies of the genitalia of<br />
some tropical species and particularly studies of chromosomes and gonads (Puplesienë<br />
& Puplesis, manuscript/unpublished) well support the polytypic concept of the family.<br />
Unfortunately, Leraut (1993) did not notice that his newly erected genus completely<br />
corresponded with Coptotriche of Walsingham (1890), a genus designated for Northern<br />
American tischeriids, which for the last hundred years has been commonly treated as<br />
a junior synonym of Tischeria Zeller, 1839. Further, Leraut (1993) associated the<br />
name Coptotriche with Tischeria (s. str.), not with Emmetia, suggesting that he had no<br />
idea what Coptotriche of Walsingham actually represented.<br />
Tischeria complanoides Frey & Boll, 1873 was designated originally by<br />
Walsingham (1890) as the type-species for Coptotriche; however complanoides is a<br />
commonly recognized junior synonym of T. zelleriella Clemens, 1859. Irrespective<br />
of whether complanoides is recognized as a separate species from zelleriella or not<br />
(we recognize it as a synonym), the type-species of Coptotriche possesses the same<br />
phylogenetically important characters as the species of Emmetia, including the<br />
type-species Tischeria marginea Haworth, 1828: the broadened valva, tulip-shaped<br />
and spined aedeagus, presence of transtilla, absence of a juxta, diaphragma with<br />
spines, greatly extended membranous half of ductus spermathecae, etc.<br />
Interestingly, one of most striking characters of the genus, the broadened valva,<br />
was illustrated by Walsingham 113 years ago (Walsingham, 1890: fig. c).<br />
The name Coptotriche can not be treated as a nomen nudum; it was used by<br />
Braun (1972) and twice by Leraut (1993).<br />
Therefore, the recently erected Emmetia has to be synonymized (Diðkus,<br />
Puplesis, 2003). But a new genus (Astrotischeria Puplesis & Diðkus) is described by<br />
us from Northern and Southern America for tischeriid species with striking<br />
genitalia and feeding characters.<br />
Three main lineages of generic rank can be recognized within Tischeriidae (fig.<br />
24). The first (Tischeria) may be the best characterized by the development of a juxta<br />
in the male genitalia, and an antrum in the female genitalia; the second (Astrotischeria)<br />
by the development of a dorsal lobe to the valva, the uncus overlaid dorsally by lobes<br />
of the pseuduncus, utilization of new host-plant families (particularly Asteraceae),<br />
and the third (Coptotriche) by the development of transtilla, spines on the<br />
diaphragma, a ‘tulip-shaped’ aedeagus and by the great enlargement of the<br />
membranous half of the ductus spermathecae in the female genitalia.<br />
The cladogram of the Tischeriidae (fig. 24) is based on 34 apomorphies listed<br />
in the disertation or published version in Diðkus, Puplesis, 2003.<br />
33