APPENDIX III: BENCHMARKS

Recommendations

Info

APPENDIX III: BENCHMARKS FOR 2009 DRGs-MDGs PROJECTS AND PROGRAMMES Benchmarks for community participation Active community participation is a key to building an empowered community. Not only is participation a requirement for all MDGs projects and programmes, it is also critical to the success of all the projects implemented under the DRG. Benchmarks Maximum (assessed by CSOs during group exercises) A community needs assessment was conducted 40 Community members participated in the needs assessment 20 Project is in line with the priority set by the community members 20 Community members played an active role in project selection, execution and monitoring Total score 100 Branding Branding is essential to the sustainability of the DGs DRG projects and programmes. It should raise the consciousness of Nigerians and other stakeholders of the importance of the DRG projects and programmes. It should also demonstrate the success of the M&E framework and the need to replicate it in other sectors. Benchmarks Measure Project is clearly tagged with the MDGs Nigeria logo and the budget year 50 Community sensitisation was conducted by the executing agency or their associate 30 Community members identify with DRGs-MDGs-funded projects 20 Total score 100 Capacity Building Service providers need to be provided with adequate skills, knowledge and the equipment/facilities needed for the successful implementation of the DRG-funded projects and programmes. This can be in the form of training programmes, expository visits, internships, supply of equipment, materials, facilities, etc. Benchmarks Measure Service providers meet minimum the standards required for the job. 20 Service providers have received additional training from the implementing body or its associate. Service providers are satisfied with the training provided. 20 Service providers have the minimum required facilities needed to carry out their work effectively. Services provided have improved due to capacity strengthening. 20 20 20 20 Page 79 of 150
Accessibility Benchmarks Measure Project is accessible to most community members. 30 Project is located where most of the community members can access the facility. 20 There are some impediments making it impossible for community members to access the facility. Impact of the DRG on the MDGs Are analyses that measure the net change in outcomes among a particular group or groups of people that can be attributed to a specific programme using the best methodology available, feasible and appropriate to the evaluation question that is being investigated and to the specific context? Goal 1 Measure Some community members were employed either on a short- or long-term basis as a result of the DRG. Families/individuals within a community are earning more income as a result of a boost in economic activities. Status of the family has improved as a result of the initiative. 20 Families now have their children/wards in schools as a result of the special initiatives. 30 Goal 2 Measure More pupils including those with disabilities are now in school due to the DRG intervention. Teaching skills have improved as a result of the teacher training scheme. 50 Goal 3 Measure Increase in the number of literate women due to the DRG intervention. 50 Ministries of Women Affairs now able to provide better services as a result of the DRG. 20 Regional and international instruments related to women and child development have been ratified as a result of advocacy and developed guidelines. Numbers of women in political position as a result of MDGs intervention. 15 Goal 4 Measure Under 5 mortality rates have been reduced in communities that benefitted from the health sector programmes. More patients, including women and children, now access services from newly constructed/renovated PHCs. More children have been immunised because of the immunisation programmes and PHCs constructed. Pregnant women are attended to by more skilled personnel. 25 30 20 50 15 25 25 25 50 Page 80 of 150
Page 1 and 2:
1 Final Report: Content Editing of
Page 3 and 4:
Content List Section One: Introduct
Page 5 and 6:
narrative that details the inputs,
Page 8 and 9:
Section Two: Summary of the Shortco
Page 10 and 11:
Problematic working relationships a
Page 12:
chain for each project defining out
Page 15 and 16:
more importantly, using the M&E fin
Page 17 and 18:
As a minimum requirement, consultan
Page 19 and 20:
5. The reports provide an important
Page 22 and 23:
Appendix Two: Introduction to Resul
Page 24 and 25:
MEETING THE M&E REPORTING CHALLENGE
Page 26 and 27:
WRITING THE REPORT (Investment/Proj
Page 28 and 29:
WRITING THE REPORT (Lessons Learned
Page 30 and 31:
Example of a Generic planning Frame
Page 32 and 33:
Input - Activities- Output - Outcom
Page 34 and 35:
Multi-layered approach to Planning
Page 36 and 37:
The Logic Chain Framework The frame
Page 38 and 39:
Does your report describe the indic
Page 40 and 41:
GUIDELINES FOR CHOOSING M&E MEASURT
Page 42 and 43:
Appendix Six: MDG Nigeria 2009 Fina
Page 45 and 46:
FOREWORD In the year 2000, the Fede
Page 47 and 48:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Millennium De
Page 49 and 50:
equipping of teachers; increasing c
Page 51 and 52:
with the responsibility of evolving
Page 53 and 54:
are the most credible channels for
Page 55 and 56:
Table 1: Allocation of DRG Funds to
Page 57 and 58:
health and education for persons at
Page 59 and 60:
CHAPTER 3: 2009 FINANCIAL ALLOCATIO
Page 61 and 62:
Allocation to MDAs The MDAs that be
Page 63 and 64:
CHAPTER 4: GOAL 1—ERADICATE EXTRE
Page 65 and 66:
country as micro-credits to improve
Page 67 and 68:
CHAPTER 5: GOAL 2—ACHIEVE UNIVERS
Page 69 and 70:
monitoring of participants. This sc
Page 71 and 72:
stood to be 100%. Training was cond
Page 73 and 74:
Summary of Progress Figure 7: Compa
Page 75 and 76:
measuring progress. These indicator
Page 77 and 78: CHAPTER 6: GOAL 3—TO PROMOTE GEND
Page 79 and 80: 2009 was recorded as 65 for male as
Page 81 and 82: Figure 3: Implementation Status of
Page 83 and 84: probably owing to the long gestatio
Page 85 and 86: (targets). (The box on the right pr
Page 87 and 88: Table 17: MDAs and Key Intervention
Page 89 and 90: is at loggerheads with either the L
Page 91 and 92: CHAPTER 8: GOAL 7—ENSURE ENVIRONM
Page 93 and 94: CGS Not Started 21% Abandoned 3% On
Page 95 and 96: CHAPTER 9: GOAL 8—TOWARDS A GLOBA
Page 97 and 98: Basic Education Summary Status 70,0
Page 99 and 100: Table 21 Indicator 1990 2000 2001 2
Page 101 and 102: CHAPTER 10: DOMESTICATION OF THE MD
Page 103 and 104: for the enrolment of children in pr
Page 105 and 106: CHAPTER 11: CHALLENGES AND LESSONS
Page 107 and 108: esults and outcomes. The OPEN‘s M
Page 109 and 110: sale of prohibited items render the
Page 111 and 112: Local Partnership for Development T
Page 113 and 114: surveillance mechanism. But the rol
Page 115 and 116: The DRGs funding for MDGs projects
Page 117 and 118: ensure that the states are involved
Page 119 and 120: APPENDIX I: M&EMETHODOLOGY Methodol
Page 121 and 122: ACHIEVEMENTS Restructuring to a Goa
Page 123 and 124: Appendix II: Questionnaires for 200
Page 125 and 126: Accessibility 1. Why is it that peo
Page 127: sustainability 6 QUALITY OF WORK: 6
Page 131 and 132: Disbursement of funds 20% Utilisati
Page 133 and 134: APPENDIX IV: DRGs PRESENCE IN THE S
Page 135 and 136: Benue State Projects Related to: Nu
Page 137 and 138: Ekiti State Projects Related to: Nu
Page 139 and 140: Kaduna State Projects Related to: N
Page 141 and 142: Lagos State Projects Related to: Nu
Page 143 and 144: Oyo State Projects Related to: Numb
Page 145 and 146: Zamfara State Projects Related to:
Page 147 and 148: APPENDIX V: STATE CONSULTANTS FOR 2
Page 149 and 150: APPENDIX VII: LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
show all

to download PDF of full document - SPARC Nigeria

Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!

to download PDF of full document - SPARC Nigeria

Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!

Delete template?

Save as template ?