- Page 1: 1 Final Report: Content Editing of
- Page 5 and 6: narrative that details the inputs,
- Page 8 and 9: Section Two: Summary of the Shortco
- Page 10 and 11: Problematic working relationships a
- Page 12: chain for each project defining out
- Page 15 and 16: more importantly, using the M&E fin
- Page 17 and 18: As a minimum requirement, consultan
- Page 19 and 20: 5. The reports provide an important
- Page 22 and 23: Appendix Two: Introduction to Resul
- Page 24 and 25: MEETING THE M&E REPORTING CHALLENGE
- Page 26 and 27: WRITING THE REPORT (Investment/Proj
- Page 28 and 29: WRITING THE REPORT (Lessons Learned
- Page 30 and 31: Example of a Generic planning Frame
- Page 32 and 33: Input - Activities- Output - Outcom
- Page 34 and 35: Multi-layered approach to Planning
- Page 36 and 37: The Logic Chain Framework The frame
- Page 38 and 39: Does your report describe the indic
- Page 40 and 41: GUIDELINES FOR CHOOSING M&E MEASURT
- Page 42 and 43: Appendix Six: MDG Nigeria 2009 Fina
- Page 45 and 46: FOREWORD In the year 2000, the Fede
- Page 47 and 48: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Millennium De
- Page 49 and 50: equipping of teachers; increasing c
- Page 51 and 52: with the responsibility of evolving
- Page 53 and 54:
are the most credible channels for
- Page 55 and 56:
Table 1: Allocation of DRG Funds to
- Page 57 and 58:
health and education for persons at
- Page 59 and 60:
CHAPTER 3: 2009 FINANCIAL ALLOCATIO
- Page 61 and 62:
Allocation to MDAs The MDAs that be
- Page 63 and 64:
CHAPTER 4: GOAL 1—ERADICATE EXTRE
- Page 65 and 66:
country as micro-credits to improve
- Page 67 and 68:
CHAPTER 5: GOAL 2—ACHIEVE UNIVERS
- Page 69 and 70:
monitoring of participants. This sc
- Page 71 and 72:
stood to be 100%. Training was cond
- Page 73 and 74:
Summary of Progress Figure 7: Compa
- Page 75 and 76:
measuring progress. These indicator
- Page 77 and 78:
CHAPTER 6: GOAL 3—TO PROMOTE GEND
- Page 79 and 80:
2009 was recorded as 65 for male as
- Page 81 and 82:
Figure 3: Implementation Status of
- Page 83 and 84:
probably owing to the long gestatio
- Page 85 and 86:
(targets). (The box on the right pr
- Page 87 and 88:
Table 17: MDAs and Key Intervention
- Page 89 and 90:
is at loggerheads with either the L
- Page 91 and 92:
CHAPTER 8: GOAL 7—ENSURE ENVIRONM
- Page 93 and 94:
CGS Not Started 21% Abandoned 3% On
- Page 95 and 96:
CHAPTER 9: GOAL 8—TOWARDS A GLOBA
- Page 97 and 98:
Basic Education Summary Status 70,0
- Page 99 and 100:
Table 21 Indicator 1990 2000 2001 2
- Page 101 and 102:
CHAPTER 10: DOMESTICATION OF THE MD
- Page 103 and 104:
for the enrolment of children in pr
- Page 105 and 106:
CHAPTER 11: CHALLENGES AND LESSONS
- Page 107 and 108:
esults and outcomes. The OPEN‘s M
- Page 109 and 110:
sale of prohibited items render the
- Page 111 and 112:
Local Partnership for Development T
- Page 113 and 114:
surveillance mechanism. But the rol
- Page 115 and 116:
The DRGs funding for MDGs projects
- Page 117 and 118:
ensure that the states are involved
- Page 119 and 120:
APPENDIX I: M&EMETHODOLOGY Methodol
- Page 121 and 122:
ACHIEVEMENTS Restructuring to a Goa
- Page 123 and 124:
Appendix II: Questionnaires for 200
- Page 125 and 126:
Accessibility 1. Why is it that peo
- Page 127 and 128:
sustainability 6 QUALITY OF WORK: 6
- Page 129 and 130:
Accessibility Benchmarks Measure Pr
- Page 131 and 132:
Disbursement of funds 20% Utilisati
- Page 133 and 134:
APPENDIX IV: DRGs PRESENCE IN THE S
- Page 135 and 136:
Benue State Projects Related to: Nu
- Page 137 and 138:
Ekiti State Projects Related to: Nu
- Page 139 and 140:
Kaduna State Projects Related to: N
- Page 141 and 142:
Lagos State Projects Related to: Nu
- Page 143 and 144:
Oyo State Projects Related to: Numb
- Page 145 and 146:
Zamfara State Projects Related to:
- Page 147 and 148:
APPENDIX V: STATE CONSULTANTS FOR 2
- Page 149 and 150:
APPENDIX VII: LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS