TROPICS
TROPICS
TROPICS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
processes, is a necessary antecedent of these processes, or is largely unrelated.<br />
For example, the generation of continental crust is commonly thought to be<br />
associated with the removal of dense lower crustal residue, and that this<br />
delamination requires isostatic adjustment and uplift of the remaining more<br />
buoyant crust. This regional epeirogenic uplift and consequent erosional<br />
unroofing would leave a recognizable signal on the landscape that can be<br />
differentiated from localized horizontally-directed tectonic forcing (e.g., Cocos<br />
Ridge collision).<br />
5. SPECIFIC PLANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES<br />
5.1 Seismic properties of the crust and the upper mantle.<br />
The primitive basaltic oceanic plateaus and arcs and a silica-rich continent are very<br />
different in mean crustal Vp, with the low value of 6.45 being characteristic of continents<br />
(Christensen and Mooney, 1995) and a much higher value of 6.8-7.0 being observed in<br />
areas of thick basaltic crust (e.g. in Iceland (Menke et al., 1998) and the Aleutians<br />
(Shillington et. al, 2004)). Poisson's ratio varies significantly too, owing to the extremely<br />
low value for the mineral quartz, with values of 0.24 (corresponding to a velocity ratio of<br />
1.71) being characteristics of a silicic crust, while higher values, often exceeding 0.27<br />
(velocity ratio of 1.78) are typical of basaltic terrains (Zandt and Ammon, 2002).<br />
Seismology thus provides an extremely effective way to gauge the degree to which the<br />
bulk crust beneath Costa Rica has become "continental", and the geographical extent of<br />
this change.<br />
Seismology will also contribute to understanding elevation gradients in Costa Rica,<br />
and especially in discriminating between three end-members, in which the highland<br />
topography is alternatively compensated by: anomalously low crustal density due to its<br />
continental nature; anomalously high mantle buoyancy due to either temperature of<br />
chemical depletion; or anomalously thick crust, due to mechanical thickening of a still<br />
largely basaltic material (Figure 2). In the crust, the correlation of seismic velocity with<br />
density is mainly due to petrology, with the faster, more mafic minerals being denser<br />
than the slower, more felsic ones. In the mantle, seismic velocities are most strongly<br />
controlled by temperature, especially in areas (such as southern Costa Rica) where no<br />
present-day volcanism is occurring, and hence where the complicating effects of partial<br />
melt are likely to be absent. A seismically-derived density structure (e.g. applying<br />
Christensen and Mooney’s (1995) formula for inferring density from crustal velocity)<br />
that includes crustal petrology, crustal thickness and mantle thermal buoyancy effects<br />
will provide a means for discriminating the alternative models.<br />
Mantle flow-induced fabric, determined via seismic anisotropy, can also be used to<br />
constrain models of crustal evolution. We would expect delamination of a dense crustal<br />
component to be associated with large-scale vertical flow in the mantle. Vertical flow<br />
implies a vertical fast direction, and a negative transverse anisotropy parameter (i.e.<br />
Gaherty’s (2001) parameter, #Vs, which is a straightforward seismic observable).<br />
However, should this flow have a strong horizontal component (e.g., Behn et al., 2007),<br />
its azimuth will also be diagnostic. Models that involve a slab widow in southern Costa<br />
Rica, and call for the transport of hot Pacific mantle northward beneath Costa Rica (e.g.,<br />
Hornle et al., 2008) imply a flow direction roughly perpendicular to that envisaged by<br />
models in which Cocos Ridge is subductig, and high topography is achieved by purestrain<br />
shortening and thickening of the highlands.<br />
The hypotheses that we are testing all require knowledge of ‘bulk earth properties’:<br />
the thickness of the crust and the velocity structure of the crust and mantle, and their<br />
geographical variation, especially at wavelength of tens of kilometers. Developing such<br />
a seismic model is more challenging than first appears, since uniformity of coverage,<br />
C-22<br />
TPI 6838742