14.06.2013 Views

TWENTIETH- - Synapse Music

TWENTIETH- - Synapse Music

TWENTIETH- - Synapse Music

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Harmonic Progression and Tonality 101<br />

The subject of harmonic progression becomes even murkier when nontenian chords<br />

are considered, because the roots of such chords are not defined by any generally accepted<br />

theory or by the common agreement of listeners. The most successful attempt to develop a<br />

universal theory of chord roots was carried out by Paul Hindemith in his Craft of <strong>Music</strong>al<br />

Composition,' first published in 1937. Al though his theory does account for al\ possible<br />

chords (with the exception of microtonal chords) and had a certain amount of influence in<br />

the middle of the century, it has since fallen into disfavor. largely because, as Hindemith<br />

himself wrote, ''A true musician believes only in what he hears,"2 and his fellow musicians<br />

remained unconvinccd.<br />

If it is no longer possible to create meaningful harmonic progressions based on<br />

chord roots, are there other possibilities? One would be to arrange a succession of chords<br />

according to some measurement of the tension, or dissonance, that each contains. Again,<br />

Hindemith was one of the few to attempt a systematic approach to harmonic tension that<br />

would account for all possible sonorities. He devised six chord groups, with six subgroups<br />

bringing the total number of classifications to twelve. To most of these was assigned<br />

a relative degree of harmonic tension, which, along with other aspects of his<br />

theory, allowed Hindemith to propose "progressions" of chords arranged according to<br />

theirtension. 3 As with his theory of chord roots, this aspect of Hindemith's theory has not<br />

withstood the test of time. Nevertheless, it wo uld be foolish to dismi ss out of hand the<br />

considered opinions of an accomplished composer, and the interested reader is urged to<br />

study his theory in its entirety'<br />

Even without a universally accepted theory, a composer is, of course, free to attempt<br />

progressions of tension. Other possibilities might include progressions of register, chord<br />

type, density, numbers of pitch classes, and so forth. We are on unfamiliar ground here, as<br />

we often are in approaching lwentieth-century works, and imaginalion and flexibility of<br />

approach are impOitanl analytical tools.<br />

NONHARMONIC MUSIC<br />

In its broadest definition, harmony means the vertical aspect of music, and a harmony, or<br />

chord. is any collcction of pitch classes sounded simultaneously. Such broad definitions<br />

are sometimes useful , but they may also distract us from the fact that a good deal of<br />

twentieth-century music is not harmonic in conception. Sometimes the "simultanei ties" in<br />

a piece are just that- the more or less uncontrolled com ing-together of ve ry independent<br />

lines: Although Schoenberg was certainl y not completely indifferent to the vertical dimcnsion,<br />

it would appear that the primary emphasis in Example 5-2, for instance, is on lines,<br />

rather than the chords that they produce. (Remember that the bass clarinet will sound a<br />

major 9th lower than wri tten.) The term linear counterpoint is often used for music of this<br />

sort, where the compositional method is evidently overwhelmingly linear. This approach is<br />

typical of much atonal music, but it occms in other styles as welL

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!