29.06.2013 Views

ELISA Real-time PCR

ELISA Real-time PCR

ELISA Real-time PCR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Anwendungen der real-time PCR

in der Lebensmittelanalytik


„stacked crops“

Source: International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA).

http://www.isaaa.org

144 GM events, representing 24 crops, have been approved worldwide.

33 GM crops are commercialised worldwide.


GM crops approved in the EU

http://ec.europa.eu/food/dyna/gm_register/index_en.cfm

Validated method:

• Sample homogenization

• DNA extraction

PCR (reagents, primer sequences, temperature program,

negative controls, positive controls…)


Legal regulations for GMO labeling

Source: E. Michelini et al., Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 392 (2008) 355-367.


Labeling regulation in the EU

Food and feed which contains, consists of, or is produced from GMOs must

carry a label which refers to the presence of GMOs.

Labeling is not required for food/feed (ingredient) in a proportion lower than 0.9%

if its presence is technically unavoidable.


Specificity of the PCR assays

Plant DNA Promoter Enhancer Structural gene Terminator Plant DNA

1. Screening

2. Gene-specific

P35S (35S promoter from Cauliflower mosaic virus)

tNOS (nopaline synthase terminator from Agrobacterium tumefaciens)

3. Construct-specific

4. Event-specific


Typical scheme in routine GMO analysis

Food product

Screening

Quantification

Less than 0.9%

No labeling required

negative

positive

Identification/

Authorised?

yes no

More than 0.9%

Labeling required


Quantification

Threshold cycle

Event MON810 Reference maize

log gene copy number


Selection of target sequences for screening

Source: H.-U. Waiblinger et al., Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 396 (2010) 2065-2072


Lebensmittelallergie

IgE

vermittelt

Lebensmittelunverträglichkeitsreaktionen

Lebensmittelallergien

(Immunologische

Reaktionen)

Nicht-toxische Toxische

Nicht IgE

vermittelt

Lebensmittelintoleranzen

(Nicht immunologische

Reaktionen)

Enzymatisch Pharmakologisch Undefiniert


Lebensmittelallergene

• Körperfremde Glycoproteine

• Molekulargewicht von 5 – 70 kDa

• Stabilität gegenüber Säure und Proteasen, Hitze

Die meisten allergenen Lebensmittel enthalten mehrere allergene

Proteine.

z.B. Corylus avellana: Cor a 1, …Cor a 11

Sesamum indicum: Ses i 1, Ses i 2, Ses i 3

Papaver somniferum: ???


Kennzeichnungspflichtige Zutaten

DIRECTIVE 2006/142/EC, Official Journal of the European Union, 2006,

L 368/110

• Glutenhaltiges Getreide

• Krustentiere

• Eier

• Fisch

• Erdnüsse

• Sojabohnen

• Milch und Milcherzeugnisse

• Nüsse

• Sellerie

• Senf und Senfsamen

• Sesam

• Schwefeldioxid und Sulfite (Konzentration > 10 mg/kg oder 10 mg/L)

• Lupine

• Weichtiere


Analytical methods – state of the art

(B-NSB)/B max [%]

1,0

0,8

0,6

0,4

0,2

0,0

Immunoanalytical methods DNA based methods

10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 104

lupine protein concentration [mg/L]

Immunoassay

Immunosensor

Immunoblot

Lateral flow test

real-time PCR


Vergleich ELISAReal-time PCR

ELISA Real-time PCR

Apparative Kosten gering hoch

Reagentien Verfügbarkeit der reproduzierbar

Antikörper herstellbar

Spezifität hoch hoch

Nachweisgrenze 0.0001-0.001% 0.001 – 0.01%

Matrixinterferenzen abhängig vom Format Hemmung der

Polymerase

Prozessierung Denaturierung des höhere Stabilität

Proteins der DNA

Kontaminationsgefahr gering hoch


Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed

(RASFF)

when a food or feed presenting a serious health risk is on the

market and when rapid action is required


Alert notifications in 2009


Culture-based methods

Sampling

Preenrichment in

non-selective medium

Selective enrichment

Isolation on

selective plates

Serological/biochemical

confirmation

real-time PCR

Sampling

Short preenrichment

DNA isolation

real-time PCR


eal-time PCR:

+ faster

vs.

+ less laborious

+ more sensitive

+ more specific


Species identification for detecting meat adulteration

Species Target gene LOD Reference

Beef, pork

Phosphodiesterase,

myostatin

Beef, pork, chicken, lamb, turkey Mitochondrial cytochrome b

Duck Mitochondrial cytochrome b

Beef, pork

Beef, pork, chicken, lamb, goat,

duck, turkey

Mitochondrial tRNA

ATPase sub. 8

Cyclic guanosine

monophosphatase,

phosphodiesterase,

ryanodine receptor,

interleukin-2 precursor,

myostatin

Beef Growth hormone

(Ballin et al., Meat Science 83 (2009) 165)

0.1% w/w (raw)

Laube et al.

(2003)

0.1% w/w (raw) Dooley et al.

(2004)

0.0001% w/w,

based on DNA

dilutions (raw)

Hird et al.

(2005)

0.1% w/w (heated) Furniere et al.

(2006)

0.1% w/w (heated) Laube et al.

(2007)

0.01% w/w, based

on DNA dilutions

(raw)

Brodmann et

al. (2003)


Quantification

Difficult to correlate the DNA concentration to the meat content

expressed as weight/weight (w/w):

• meat products frequently consist of different tissue types

• in most cases the tissue composition is not known

• different tissue types contain different concentrations of DNA

• the tissue type influences the extraction yield


Influence of the tissue type on the extraction

yield

Source: Laube et al., Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 42 (2007) 336-341


DNA material

Single copy genomic DNA

• one copy per cell high LOD

• constant copy number enables quantification

Mitochondrial DNA

• most cells contain multiple copies low LOD

• variation on copy numbers in different tissues

not suitable for quantification

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!