30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter Two Part One – Literature review - Page 26<br />

discoveries for over a century (Devereux, 1951; Freud, 1900/1953; Mimica, 2007;<br />

Roheim, 1925; Schwartz, White, & Lutz, 1992; Spain, 1992), and has been said more<br />

recently (LeVine & Sharma, 1997) to be more alive than it has ever been. Mimica’s<br />

collection (2007) is among the latest products of this source. Given developments in<br />

both fields, and in the wider intellectual context of the social sciences, the time seems<br />

right to try and extend what is possible in terms of synergy between the fields.<br />

The topic is important within the fields of psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic<br />

psychotherapy, and group therapy, and in training for those fields. Psychotherapeutic<br />

clinical work in itself essentially constitutes a form of research, especially when<br />

conducted under supervision or with access to consultation, (Farrell, 1996; Kvale, 1986;<br />

Tuckett, 1994). However, beyond basic training, engagement in research by<br />

practitioners is not extensive. Nor has the field engaged much of the attention of non-<br />

clinical researchers, despite some fine examples of this (e.g. Schön, 1983). Research<br />

about training, and in group work, is even more limited (Carter, 2002), not least because<br />

of problems of access and complexity.<br />

The construction of psychoanalytic clinical work as research links to what may well be<br />

a significant turn in psychosocial research. Although an overwhelming case for the use<br />

of qualitative approaches in this area has long been made, it can be argued that aspects<br />

of previous paradigms still persist. A critical perspective on qualitative methodologies<br />

suggests that many positivist features have survived, together with pressures to eschew<br />

interpretation, for example in feminist and critical theory methodologies. A key concern<br />

that leads to unease with interpretation is the wish to avoid disempowerment, but much<br />

is missing from accounts that can appear overcome with this concern. There is a<br />

considerable potential psychoanalytic contribution to research methodology that awaits

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!