here. - Auto Electronics Magazine
here. - Auto Electronics Magazine
here. - Auto Electronics Magazine
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
C O V E R S T O R Y<br />
HYBRID VEHICLES<br />
PROPEL<br />
INCREASED ELECTRONICS CONTENT<br />
12 WARD’S AUTO ELECTRONICS | OCTOBER 2004<br />
by Randy Frank, Contributing Editor<br />
Hybrid vehicles are expected to more than double the use of electronic<br />
components in automobiles. This report investigates the impact of hybrid<br />
vehicles on the powertrain as it probes architectural developments.<br />
It also shows how it is driving the design of power components like inverters,<br />
dc-dc converters, battery chargers, cooling systems, electric power steering<br />
and electric A/C, along with electric clutch disengage<br />
and regen braking, as well as other in hybrid designs.<br />
Ahybrid powertrain that combines an internal combustion or<br />
diesel engine with electric propulsion adds several design options<br />
to vehicle manufacturers and several costly components to the<br />
vehicle. From some estimates, the electrical/electronic content in the<br />
vehicle will almost double if the vehicle is a hybrid, especially in the near<br />
term with low volumes. The key added components of the hybrid include<br />
an electric motor, inverter, dc-dc converter, control electronics and highvoltage<br />
batteries. Ford has indicated that the price of the 2005 Escape<br />
Hybrid will be $3,300 more than a comparably equipped V-6 (only)<br />
powered Escape [1]. GM’s Silverado 42 V mild hybrids cost $1500 more [1].<br />
FROM FUEL ECONOMY ONLY TO PERFORMANCE<br />
Expected sales of existing U.S. hybrid vehicles in 2004 are<br />
approximately 36,000 Honda Civics and 47,000 Toyota Prius with the<br />
Honda Insight dropping to a mere 1,000 or so units. The addition of Ford’s<br />
Hybrid Escape with forecast annual sales of 20,000 units (4,000 units in<br />
2004), GM’s Silverado and Sierra models (scheduled for 2,500 units in<br />
MY2005) and Daimler Chrysler’s diesel electric Ram pickup scheduled for<br />
100 units will raise hybrid numbers slightly [1]. However, with sales of 16<br />
million total cars and light trucks expected in 2004, this means hybrids are<br />
quite a bit less than 1% of the market—but it’s a start.<br />
Powertrain<br />
Control<br />
Electronic<br />
Transmission<br />
Future/Emerging<br />
Loads<br />
Electromagnetic Valves<br />
Integrated Starter/Alternator<br />
Electrical A/C Compressor<br />
Electromechanical Brakes<br />
Active Suspension<br />
Electric Turbocharger<br />
Power Running Boards
Power Windows, Door Locks,<br />
Seats, Antenna<br />
Heated Backlight<br />
Body Electronic Systems<br />
(Climate Control, Keyless Entry,<br />
Digital Instrument Panel)<br />
Electronic Power Steering<br />
Air Bag System<br />
Lighting<br />
Systems<br />
ABS Brake<br />
System<br />
Advanced Entertainment<br />
Systems<br />
OCTOBER 2004 | WARD’S AUTO ELECTRONICS<br />
M O R E<br />
13
C O V E R S T O R Y<br />
In spite of record high fuel<br />
prices in 2004, the additional<br />
upfront cost of the fuel-efficient<br />
hybrid would still mean a<br />
payback period of two to three<br />
years to offset the higher<br />
purchase price. In contrast,<br />
customers appear to be more<br />
than willing to pay an additional<br />
$895 for a Dodge Durango with<br />
a 345 hp, 5.7-liter hemi engine<br />
over the 230 hp,<br />
4.7-liter engine. To further<br />
raise the cost impact of their<br />
purchase, drivers often trade<br />
in a perfectly good low-mileage,<br />
one-year-old vehicle to get the<br />
additional performance, costing<br />
them an additional $7000 to<br />
$8000 in depreciation [2].<br />
Hybrids have the potential<br />
to provide fuel economy,<br />
performance and reduce<br />
emissions. <strong>Auto</strong>motive power<br />
train designers have options<br />
depending on the type of vehicle<br />
they want to produce. For highest<br />
Vehicle Engine (hp) Motor (hp) Total (hp)<br />
Curb Weight<br />
(Lbs)<br />
Power to Weight<br />
(x100)<br />
Honda Insight 55 10 65 1964 3.3<br />
Toyota Prius 2002 70 25 95 2765 3.4<br />
Honda Civic Hybrid 85 13 98 2732 3.6<br />
Toyota Prius 2004 82 28 110 2890 3.8<br />
Ford F-150 2004, 4.6L V-8, reg bed 231 — 231 4788 4.8<br />
EPA Data for Average P/W<br />
Extrapolated to 2004<br />
4.9<br />
Toyota Camry 4-cyl 2004 auto trans 157 — 157 3142 5.0<br />
Chevy Silverado 2004, Vortec 4.8L<br />
V-8<br />
285 — 285 4555 6.3<br />
Honda Accord, STD 2004 6 cyl 240 — 240 3265 7.4<br />
Honda Accord Hybrid* 240 13 253 3415 7.4<br />
Honda Accord, STD 2004 4 cyl 231 — 231 3109 7.4<br />
*Assuming only 13 hp added by electric motor and additional weight of 150 pounds.<br />
Table 1. Power-to-weight ratio for hybrid vehicles and most popular cars and trucks [3].<br />
14 WARD’S AUTO ELECTRONICS | OCTOBER 2004<br />
Figure 1. The power-to-weight trend for combined light car and truck sales in the<br />
United States [4].<br />
fuel economy, the engine and electric motor are operated at optimal<br />
points to achieve high efficiency. The internal combustion engine (ICE)<br />
has average efficiencies of 15% but can achieve 30% when operating<br />
in the sweet spot. For performance, different points in the torque and<br />
horsepower curves between the motor and engine are exploited. This<br />
can provide more low-end torque with increased fuel economy.<br />
The Accord hybrid that will go into production in 2005 provides an<br />
example of the change in hybrid design. It uses the Integrated Motor<br />
Assist (IMA) hybrid system concept from the Insight and Civic but will<br />
provide V-6 performance with 4-cylinder economy. Honda did not<br />
M O R E
C O V E R S T O R Y<br />
reduce the engine size when it<br />
added the electric motor to the<br />
drive train. A summary of vehicles<br />
and their performance increase<br />
using electric motors is shown in<br />
Table 1. Using historical values,<br />
the Honda Insight’s 0.033 and<br />
Toyota’s 2002 Prius at 0.034 hplb<br />
are more like the performance of<br />
vehicles sold in the early 1980s,<br />
limiting the number of people<br />
who would be interested in<br />
purchasing such vehicles for lack<br />
of performance. For comparison,<br />
a 2004 Camry 6 cylinder is 0.062<br />
and Ford F-150 5.4L V-8 is 0.061<br />
hp/lb. When vehicles exceed<br />
0.047 hp/lb they appeal to more<br />
than 50% of the buyers, and those<br />
buyers are frequently willing to pay<br />
more money for performance, as<br />
indicated in Figure 1 [3].<br />
(a) (b)<br />
Figure 2. Honda Insight mild hybrid (a) compared to the Toyota Prius full hybrid (b).<br />
POWER ELECTRONICS IN HYBRIDS<br />
Two common classifications for today’s hybrid are: (1) mild<br />
and (2) full hybrid. The 166 V Honda Insight in Figure 2 (a) is a mild<br />
hybrid because it always uses the gas engine to drive the wheels<br />
and the electric motor provides an extra boost during acceleration.<br />
In contrast, the Toyota Prius in Figure 2 (b) is a full hybrid with
Figure 3. Powering Ford’s Hybrid Escape Split Hybrid system and traditional 14 V loads.<br />
the ability to use the engine alone, the electric motor alone, or a<br />
combination of both to drive the wheels.<br />
Like the Toyota Prius, the Ford Hybrid Escape is a full hybrid.<br />
Another classification for hybrids is series, parallel or split hybrid<br />
system. The Ford Escape Hybrid and Toyota Prius are both split<br />
systems with a planetary gear that allows operation in either the<br />
Circle 111 on Reader Service Card<br />
parallel or series mode. As shown<br />
in Figure 3, in the parallel path<br />
the energy is converted and<br />
directly transmitted to the driving<br />
wheel through a mechanical path.<br />
In the series mode, the energy is<br />
converted to electrical energy by<br />
the generator.<br />
Ford’s Escape Hybrid<br />
demonstrates the added system<br />
complexity with hybrids. The<br />
Escape Hybrid brings together:<br />
• Transaxle from Aisin AW that<br />
includes a 70 kW, 400 V electric<br />
motor,<br />
• 330 V nickel-metal hydride<br />
battery pack from Sanyo,<br />
• 400 V, 300 A generator,<br />
• Regenerative brakes from<br />
Continental Teves,<br />
• 14 V electric power steering<br />
from NSK,<br />
M O R E
C O V E R S T O R Y<br />
• 1.5 kW dc-dc converter from<br />
TDK,<br />
• Battery software from PI<br />
Technology, and<br />
• 2.3 liter, 4-cylinder Atkinson<br />
cycle engine from Ford.<br />
Each of these hardware<br />
elements is controlled by software<br />
that must work together flawlessly<br />
to achieve 35 mpg to 40 mpg in<br />
city driving and avoid reliability<br />
problems [6].<br />
As shown in Figure 3, the<br />
inverter, traction motor and<br />
traction generator combine<br />
for vehicle propulsion, battery<br />
charging and regenerative braking.<br />
The dc-dc converter provides 14 V<br />
power for the vehicle’s electrical/<br />
electronic components. The<br />
key to high efficiency and long<br />
component life in hybrid power<br />
electronics controlling several<br />
kilowatts is integration and<br />
ethylene-glycol cooling. This is<br />
true in the Hybrid Excape, Toyota’s<br />
Crown and Prius, Honda’s Insight<br />
and Civic, and GM’s 42 V Silverado.<br />
Figure 4. Dc-dc converter used in Toyota’s Crown 42 V THS-M compared to<br />
surface-mounted TO-220 D 2 PAK commonly used in today’s 14 V vehicles [7].<br />
Courtesy of Toyota Motor Company.<br />
18 WARD’S AUTO ELECTRONICS | OCTOBER 2004<br />
CONVERTING THE VOLTAGE<br />
Toyota designed a 1.2 kW dc-dc converter for its dual-voltage<br />
42 V Crown THS-M (Toyota Hybrid System — Mild). The layout in<br />
Figure 4 shows some of the packaging-related problems associated with<br />
switching higher power. Three 6.8 mm x 5.9 mm 75 V trench MOSFETs<br />
are used in this converter. Using synchronous rectification instead of<br />
the diode improved peak efficiency from 90.8% to 92.8% in the 20 A<br />
range and by almost a percent at maximum current (85 A) range. Note<br />
the multiple wire bonds used to connect to the power die and to connect<br />
the substrate with the external connections. In contrast, the industry<br />
standard surface-mounted D 2 PAK has a footprint of 10.2 mm x 15.4 mm<br />
(0.4 inches x 0.6 inches) and a maximum die size of 4.3 mm x 6.9 mm<br />
(0.170 inches x 0.270 inches). This package is used for many of the higher<br />
power loads in today’s 14 V vehicles that are typically 100 W (average) or<br />
less [7].<br />
In the new Prius, two dc-dc converters are used. One boosts the<br />
voltage from the 202 V battery to provide 500 V power for the traction<br />
motor and generator. The other dc-dc converter reduces the voltage<br />
from 202 V to 14 V to power traditional vehicle loads. Based on the<br />
number of existing 14 V components, high-voltage transitions will be<br />
common in higher-voltage vehicles.<br />
OTHER POWER CHANGES<br />
Since the engine is usually off in hybrid vehicles at idle and could<br />
be off during braking, vehicle systems that rely on the engine for power<br />
must be addressed. These systems include power steering, A/C and<br />
braking. The answer to the engine-off situation is frequently the use<br />
of electric power steering (EPS) or electrohydraulic power steering<br />
(EHPS), electric A/C, and<br />
regenerative braking. An electric<br />
clutch is added to the system<br />
that disengages the components<br />
from the engine when it is shut<br />
off. Figure 5 shows the clutch<br />
for disconnecting the loads<br />
normally driven by the engine in<br />
GM’s belt alternator system (BAS)<br />
mild hybrid. The clutch will be<br />
electrically operated as it is in the<br />
Toyota Crown.<br />
In the smaller-size hybrid<br />
vehicles, electric power steering<br />
can be implemented with 14 V.<br />
However, larger vehicles such<br />
as the Chevy Silverado and GM<br />
Sienna require higher voltage and<br />
take advantage of the 42 V bus and<br />
available 42 V EPS systems. Peak<br />
current in a 14 V EPS can be as high<br />
M O R E
C O V E R S T O R Y<br />
Vehicle Model Year Voltage Motor Type Engine Comments<br />
Chevrolet<br />
Silverado/<br />
GM Sierra<br />
2004 42 V 14 kW ISAD 5.3 L, V-8<br />
stop-start system and gets 12% to 15% improved fuel economy. A<br />
variation of the Allison Hybrid Bus System offered in 2003 will be its<br />
first full-hybrid passenger vehicle and will be used in future full-size<br />
SUVs and pickup trucks in 2007-2008 [7].<br />
More recently, Toyota and Ford have scrambled to find ways<br />
to increase capacity based on higher fuel prices and higher-thanexpected<br />
consumer interest in fuel-efficient hybrids. This is just the<br />
beginning. We are in for an even more exciting ride.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Chevy Equinox 2006 BAS<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Fuel economy improvements of about<br />
12% and 2 110 Vac power source<br />
Saturn Vue 2006 42 V 7 kW BAS 2 L, 4 Cyl. CVT. 12 to 15% better fuel economy<br />
Chevrolet Malibu 2007 42 V 7 kW BAS 4 Cyl. CVT. 12 to 15% better fuel economy<br />
Full-size<br />
pick-up truck<br />
(Silverado/Sierra)<br />
SUVs<br />
(Tahoe & Yukon)<br />
2008 300 V<br />
2008 300V<br />
Table 2. GM’s recently updated (Fall 2003) hybrids plan.<br />
as 100 A. For the same value motor<br />
that value reduces to slightly more,<br />
than 33 A for a 42 V supply.<br />
EXPECT CHANGES<br />
With the demonstrated<br />
success of Toyota’s New Prius<br />
and the Honda Civic and new<br />
vehicles from Ford, GM, Daimler<br />
Chrysler, Toyota and Honda,<br />
car makers will soon know even<br />
more about what sells and what<br />
consumers want from a hybrid<br />
vehicle. However, the amount of<br />
technical challenges, changing<br />
economic outlook impacting<br />
development budgets and fuel<br />
concerns shifting consumers’<br />
interest from fuel-guzzling<br />
SUVs to fuel-efficient vehicles<br />
have already provided shifts<br />
in product plans and launch<br />
schedules.<br />
In 2003, GM announced<br />
a change in its plans for the<br />
Saturn Vue from a full hybrid<br />
with two motors and a transaxle<br />
that would have achieved 50%<br />
improved fuel economy to a lessexpensive<br />
42 V belt alternator<br />
starter (BAS) mild hybrid system<br />
with a continuously variable<br />
transmission (CVT) that is a<br />
20 WARD’S AUTO ELECTRONICS | OCTOBER 2004<br />
(2) 30<br />
kW<br />
(2) 30<br />
kW<br />
AHS II V-8<br />
AHSII V-8<br />
Allison-derived Advanced Hybrid<br />
System II, 25 to 30% improved fuel<br />
economy<br />
Allison-derived Advanced Hybrid<br />
System II, 25 to 30% improved fuel<br />
economy<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Figure 5. GM’s 42 V belt alternator system shows the additional clutch and special<br />
consideration that must be given for A/C compressor, power steering (P/S) and water pump.<br />
M O R E
C O V E R S T O R Y<br />
HYBRID VEHICLES PROPEL INCREASED ELECTRONICS CONTENT<br />
THE ELECTRONIC<br />
GAS TANK<br />
The hybrid vehicle needs<br />
energy storage for the<br />
electric portion of its<br />
propulsion system in addition to<br />
the gasoline or diesel fuel tank<br />
for the engine. Long term this<br />
could come from fuel cells, but<br />
today batteries provide the energy<br />
storage. The 12 V battery has gone<br />
through various improvements<br />
during its 50-some years as the<br />
reigning vehicle electrical system<br />
voltage. However, the electrical<br />
propulsion in the hybrid requires<br />
storage capability beyond<br />
traditional 12 V battery technology.<br />
Battery chemistries that are<br />
being evaluated and developed<br />
for hybrid vehicles include<br />
valve-regulated lead acid<br />
(VRLA) batteries, nickel metal<br />
hydride (NiMH) and Lithium<br />
ion (Li-ion) technologies. Key<br />
concerns with these batteries in<br />
hybrid applications are cost and<br />
reliability. As shown in the spider<br />
chart, VRLA technology excels<br />
in economics, cold cranking and<br />
recycling infrastructure because<br />
it is an improvement on the<br />
established lead-acid battery. In<br />
contrast, Li-Ion technology has<br />
the highest energy density while<br />
NiMH has the highest specifi c<br />
power and charge acceptance.<br />
Today, 42 V vehicles such as<br />
Toyota’s Crown and GM’s Silverado<br />
22 WARD’S AUTO ELECTRONICS | OCTOBER 2004<br />
and Sierra models use VRLA technology. Higher-voltage vehicles such as<br />
the Toyota Prius and Ford Hybrid Escape models use Ni-MH batteries.<br />
In Ford’s Hybrid Escape, the Sanyo battery also includes battery control<br />
electronics.<br />
Toyota reduced the battery voltage from 275 V in its initial Prius to<br />
202 V for the new Prius and used a dc-dc converter to boost the voltage to<br />
500 V. With 500 V, they use a 50 kW traction motor instead of 33 kW motor<br />
used with power direct from the 275 V battery. The voltage conversion<br />
A comparison of key battery characteristics for valve regulated lead acid (VRLA)<br />
versus NiMH versus Li-Ion [8]. Background: Sanyo’s 330V sealed NiMH in the Ford<br />
Escape has 250 D size cells in series.<br />
M O R E
C O V E R S T O R Y<br />
provides increased power with<br />
lower battery voltage, placing less<br />
stress on the high-voltage energy<br />
source.<br />
The replacement cost of<br />
the battery in the Toyota Prius<br />
has been quoted at $3,000.<br />
With unproven history, vehicle<br />
manufacturers are offering<br />
warranties of eight years/100,000<br />
miles on the initial hybrids.<br />
Nissan displayed Li-ion<br />
batteries at the 2003 Tokyo Motor<br />
Show using laminated cells that<br />
are less than half the size of rival<br />
systems. A 25 kW battery would<br />
have a volume of only 15 liters<br />
compared with 45 liters using<br />
conventional technology. The thin<br />
cell construction also improves<br />
cooling [7].<br />
Supercapacitors/<br />
ultracapacitors can relieve the<br />
stress on the battery and provide<br />
peak energy capability when<br />
needed. Ultracapacitors have<br />
been used in 42 V and fuel cell<br />
development vehicles to cover<br />
ABOUT THE AUTHOR<br />
Randy Frank is a freelance writer<br />
and president of Randy Frank<br />
& Associates, Ltd., a technical<br />
marketing consulting firm based in<br />
Scottsdale, AZ. He can be reached<br />
at rfrank68@cox.net.<br />
24 WARD’S AUTO ELECTRONICS | OCTOBER 2004<br />
Ultracapacitors provide additional energy storage capability for hybrids and<br />
potentially any vehicle application w<strong>here</strong> momentary peak energy is required.<br />
Courtesy: Maxwell Technologies.<br />
the peak energy needs in portions of the system and avoid increasing<br />
the size of other costly components. Maxwell Technologies introduced<br />
a standard size D Cell ultracapacitor earlier this year that is expected<br />
to drive down the cost and ease the integration of the technology into<br />
production vehicles. The first production use of ultracapacitors will most<br />
likely occur on a 14 V vehicle in 2005.<br />
REFERENCES:<br />
1. Richard Truett, “DCX, GM Go Slow On Hybrids,” <strong>Auto</strong>motive News,<br />
July 5, 2004.<br />
2. Mary Connelly, “People Keep Asking: ‘That Thing got a Hemi?’”<br />
<strong>Auto</strong>motive News, Feb. 16, 2004.<br />
3. Hansen Report on <strong>Auto</strong>motive <strong>Electronics</strong>, March 2004.<br />
4. “Light-Duty <strong>Auto</strong>motive Technology and Fuel Economy Trends: 1975<br />
Through 2004,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA420-R-04-<br />
001, April 2004.<br />
5. Venkateswara Anand Sankaran, “Introducing Power <strong>Electronics</strong> in<br />
Ford Hybrid Escape Vehicle,” Power <strong>Electronics</strong> Society Newsletter,<br />
Vol. 16, No. 3, October 2004, pp. 13-15.<br />
6. Richard Truett and Amy Wilson, “Systems Don’t Mesh so Ford Hybrid<br />
is Delayed,” <strong>Auto</strong>motive News, Nov. 3, 2003.<br />
7. Intertech’s “Power Management in Today’s and Future <strong>Auto</strong>motive<br />
Systems,” including the 2004 update http://www.intertechusa.com/<br />
studies/PowerManagement/PM_Study.htm<br />
8. Richard Johnson, “Spiral Wound Lead-Acid Batteries for 42V<br />
Applications,” SAE 42 V Challenges Toptec, April 29-30, 2002, Troy, MI.<br />
E N D