02.07.2013 Views

The 2nd World Humanities Forum

The 2nd World Humanities Forum

The 2nd World Humanities Forum

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!

Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.

<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

1(Thu) - 3(Sat) November 2012 / BEXCO, Busan, Republic of Korea<br />

Contacts<br />

whf@unesco.or.kr<br />

http://www.worldhumanitiesforum.org<br />

Proceedings<br />

<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings


Proceedings


SESSION 4<br />

Parallel Session 2. Call for Papers Session 385<br />

Parallel 2-1. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong>, Narratives, Memory, and Healing 387<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> and Medicine: Narratives of Illness and Suffering 389<br />

/ John Clammer (United Nations University)<br />

<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

2. Understanding of the Motherland and Narrative Representation of Healing Shown in<br />

the Novels of Korean-Japanese writer Yang-Ji Lee 409<br />

/ Jung-Hwa Yun (Ewha Womans University)<br />

3. No One Has Ever Died of the <strong>Humanities</strong>: Healing and Transcendence in the<br />

Contemporary <strong>World</strong> 426<br />

/ Elizabeth S. Gunn (Morgan State University)<br />

4. <strong>The</strong> Role of Memory for Healing in Gloria Naylor’s <strong>The</strong> Women of Brewster Place 437<br />

/ Myung-joo Kim (Chungnam National University)<br />

Parallel 2-2. Language, Gender, and Senses 447<br />

1. Healing Thought: <strong>The</strong>rapeutic Philosophy and the Critique of Metaphysics 449<br />

/ Anthony Curtis Adler (Yonsei University )<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> Practicing of Feminism as Healing <strong>Humanities</strong> 464<br />

/ Ra-Keum Huh (Ewha Womans University)<br />

3. Emotions and <strong>Humanities</strong> Healing: <strong>The</strong> Greek Philosophers and the Stoics’<br />

Understanding of Emotions 478<br />

/ Wooryong Park (Sogang University)<br />

4. <strong>The</strong> Healing Function of Talchum 494<br />

/ Hyun Shik Ju (Sogang University)<br />

Parallel 2-3. Diseases, Pathology, and Social Healing 511<br />

1. Society as a Patient: Metapathology, Healing and Challenges of Self and Social<br />

Transformations 513<br />

/ Ananta Kumar Giri (Madras Institute of Development Studies)<br />

2. Princess Bari, Answering the Conundrum of Sufferings of the <strong>World</strong> 521<br />

/ Kang Ha Yu (Kangwon National University)<br />

3. Displacement as Disease: Exploring the Links between Traditional Healing and Well-<br />

Being in the Context of a Relocation Crisis 535<br />

/ Ronel P. Dela Cruz (St. Paul University Quezon City)<br />

4. Treatment of Hwabyung in Traditional Medicine with Four Elements of Non-Violent<br />

Communication 548<br />

/ Young-Wan Kim (Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine)<br />

5<br />

Contents


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Keynote Lecture<br />

<strong>The</strong> Human Sciences and the Healing of Civilizations<br />

/ Yersu Kim (Kyung Hee University)<br />

Catharsis by Confronting the Past:<br />

Lessons of Germany’s Double Burden of Dictatorship<br />

/ Konrad H. Jarausch (University of North Carolina)<br />

Regeneration by Complete Humanism<br />

* La régénéréscence par l’humanisme intégral<br />

/ Michel Maffesoli (Paris Descartes University Sorbonne)


<strong>The</strong> Human Sciences and the Healing of Civilizations<br />

Yersu Kim<br />

Kyung Hee University<br />

A miracle at Centum City?<br />

I would like to thank the organizing committee of this very important forum on <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong><br />

for placing enough confidence in me to give one of the keynote talks on a topic that is crucial for<br />

understanding the nature and the role of the humanities in today’s world. I can only say that I will do my<br />

very best to be worthy of that confidence, but I am not confident that that would be enough.<br />

Please allow me to engage in some personal reminiscences. Exactly 60 years ago, I left Korea for the<br />

unknown world of the United States, probably from the very place I am speaking at this moment. Centum<br />

City was at that time the place of Suyoung Airport at the westernmost corner of Busan, the temporary<br />

capital of the Republic of Korea, fighting for its very survival in the vortex of an international war that<br />

involved the United States, the Soviet Union, the People’s Republic of China, and sixteen nations of the<br />

United Nations, and of course two Koreas. <strong>The</strong> airport was the hub of much military air traffic, and a<br />

small corner was allotted to civilian use that connected the Korean peninsula to the outside world.<br />

After 48 hours of flight, stopovers, and being quite airsick, I landed in San Francisco. Although in a daze,<br />

I could dimly see that I was in a world totally different from the one I left two days ago, where I did not<br />

know how to operate a flush toilet, and my culinary and linguistic ability was only just enough to order<br />

tomato soup for all three meals.<br />

Buildings were taller than I had imagined. <strong>The</strong> streets were wide and clean, and full of tall trees and<br />

automobiles. <strong>The</strong> brightly colored houses were painted in yellow, pink and blue as only the houses in fairy<br />

tale books could be. People were clean and smiling and said “Hi” or “Hello” even to a bewildered boy<br />

from a far-off land. Everything seemed and looked better than what I had expected from what I had read,<br />

9<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

heard and experienced from the American soldiers, stationed in Korea. It dimly occurred to me at the time<br />

that this new world, this new civilization would never be mine, too far away, too different from the one I<br />

was used to. But I was determined that I would do my best to learn as much as I could and bring it back<br />

home to make Korea a better place to live.<br />

Busan had been at that time the temporary capital of South Korea during much of the fratricidal war at<br />

the front line of the ideological confrontation between the so-called the Free <strong>World</strong> and the Soviet bloc.<br />

Busan, a port city of about a half million at that time the war broke out, was bursting at the seams with an<br />

influx of more than two million refugees from all parts of Korea. <strong>The</strong>re were also soldiers of both Korean<br />

and foreign nationalities who were passing through Busan as one of the central points of deployment. <strong>The</strong><br />

city swarmed with soldiers who had been wounded on the fronts and being sent to the hospitals or simply<br />

discharged without adequate provisions or care.<br />

<strong>The</strong> city simply was not capable of dealing with the situation. <strong>The</strong>re was not enough food, the signs<br />

of malnourishment were obvious to everyone, and some even died of hunger. To say that housing was<br />

inadequate would be an understatement, and shanties and mud-huts sprang up in the many parts of the<br />

city, with attendant problems of sanitation, safety and fire protection. <strong>The</strong>re was a serious shortage of<br />

water, making long lines of people with big buckets waiting for long hours for drinking water a part of<br />

the street scene. Begging in the street, burglary, and pick-pocketing were daily occurrences and seemed<br />

somehow to be “natural” parts of the daily life in this city. With the police forces overburdened, everyone<br />

was on his own, left to fend off as best he could whatever harm that might occur to him in this miserable<br />

city.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was of course easy money to be made in the hustle and bustle and the confusion of war. <strong>The</strong>re were<br />

smugglers of much needed goods from such places as Japan, Hong Kong and Macau. Merchants dealing<br />

in illicitly obtained military goods made fortunes. While some serious-minded entrepreneurs began laying<br />

the foundations for their post-war business empires by beginning to meet the needs of the military and<br />

civilians, the easy money was accompanied by corruption in high and low places and decadent life styles.<br />

Prostitutes were a common sight in the streets, and cabarets, tearooms, and secret dance halls dotted the<br />

streets at nights. Some youths were deeply drenched in nihilism born of the miseries of daily life and<br />

hopelessness about the future. Sartre and Camus were much talked about, if little read.<br />

Even in the midst of misery and suffering, schools and universities were opening their temporary<br />

campuses. My school was putting up temporary classrooms in military tents on vegetable field at the<br />

outskirt of Busan. When the wind blew, we would be covered with dust from the field underneath our<br />

benches, which contained infectious remnants of human manure that had been used as fertilizers for<br />

10


vegetables. But that did not matter. We were all happy that we were fortunate enough to go to school<br />

again, and even having to resort to dim candles during frequent power outages could not dampen our<br />

sprit. Young males were conscripted to serve in the army and many lost their lives. But even more began<br />

to experience, in an indirect way, the West, in the military system that was based on the organization<br />

and management of the US armed forces. Many young military officers were sent to the US for training,<br />

thereby giving them first-hand experience of a culture and civilization so totally different from their own.<br />

When the cruelly destructive war came to an end with an inconclusive truce in 1953, Korea was one of the<br />

poorest countries in the world, if not the poorest. According to <strong>World</strong> Bank statistics, even as late as 1962<br />

the per capita GNI was $100, less than that of the many LDCs today, and certainly less than that of many<br />

Asian neighbors such as the Philippines and Malaysia. During the period from 1953 to 1960, as the rubble<br />

of the war was being cleared, more than 70 percent of the government income was from foreign aid,<br />

predominantly from the US through such diverse channels and institutions as ECA, UNKRA, ICA, and<br />

PL480. <strong>The</strong>re are acronyms which may ring a bell with some older members in the audience who have<br />

lived through the times when Korea was poor and destitute.<br />

Today, a half century later, Busan stands transformed. Korea’s second largest metropolis after Seoul and<br />

world’s fifth busiest seaport by cargo tonnage, Busan is a modern city of 3,600,000. It was the host to the<br />

2002 Asian Games, the 2005 APEC Meeting, the 2010 G-20 Summit, and the 2011 Nuclear Summit. <strong>The</strong><br />

Busan International Film Festival, held every year on these very premises, has become the largest and<br />

most talked about international film festival in Asia. Earlier this year, the population of Korea reached the<br />

50 million mark and our media celebrated the event with Korea’s symbolic entry into the 20-50 Club, a<br />

notional club whose seven members each have a population of more than 50 million and per capita GNI<br />

of more than US $20,000. It was emphasized in the media that Korea is the only member of the Club<br />

which has won independent after the end of <strong>World</strong> War II.<br />

A Craving for Healing<br />

A miracle at Centum City? A transformation of great magnitude has certainly taken place. A world has<br />

been created that was unimaginable in the minds of the youngster who left Suyoung some sixty years ago.<br />

Have Koreans not been “healed” from the misery and suffering from poverty and indignity? Has such a<br />

miracle at Centum City brought happiness and fulfillment to the people of Korea?<br />

Let us take a little detour to answer this seemingly simple question.<br />

A few weeks ago, a presidential hopeful, who had just been nominated the official candidate of the<br />

11<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

opposition party, promised he would be a “healing” president. A committee has been formed by the party<br />

with a focus on developing policies to redress the anxiety of the people regarding housing, education,<br />

security and old age and youth employment, and was to be called the “healing policies committee”. <strong>The</strong><br />

candidate of the governing party, for her part, came up with “the headquarters for the happiness of 50<br />

million” which would perform similar functions as the healing committee of the opposition party. <strong>The</strong><br />

third candidate, a political neophyte, who gained national prominence by conducting youth concerts and<br />

mentoring the youth, has recently declared his candidacy for the office of president, vowing to become the<br />

“healing president” for Korea. <strong>The</strong>re is an enormously popular television show called “Healing Camp”,<br />

which consists of well-known public personalities who publicly confess to past mistakes and unhappy<br />

moments in their lives and by the end of the show magically declare themselves “healed.”<br />

Korea is today awash with “healing” since perhaps the middle of last decade. <strong>The</strong>re are healing walks,<br />

healing food, healing tourism, healing lectures, healing dances, healing equestrian clubs, and healing<br />

forest resorts and the list seems endless. <strong>The</strong> marketing industry seems to have found a new blue ocean<br />

where neglected products and activities make new appearances with “healing” label and naturally at<br />

substantially enhanced price. Bookstores have special counters selling books dealing with various aspects<br />

of healings. Books by Buddhist monks top the bestseller list and the demand comes from a wide range of<br />

social groups, spanning people in their 20’s to those in their 50’s and beyond.<br />

Healing is a restorative concept with many nuances. When we speak of healing in physiological<br />

sense, we refer to damage or disease suffered by an organism, and, in these terms, healing as a whole<br />

means resumption of the natural functioning of the biological system as a whole. Medical treatments<br />

would be more appropriate word for this process with well-defined procedures performed by trained<br />

and experienced experts. When we speak of healing in a psychological or spiritual sense, we refer to<br />

damage or suffering in the mind and soul. And through some non-physical process of “healing”, the<br />

resumption of normal and fulfilling existence becomes possible. 1 It is thus natural that many people seek<br />

healing in religion. More people throng to Christian retreats and temple stays – a few days of quiet and<br />

contemplation in secluded places of prayer and contemplation. Some people retreat to a more primitive<br />

mode of living close to nature and away from the conveniences of modern civilization. People thereby<br />

wish to be free from the stresses of daily life and to restore themselves through quiet and contemplation to<br />

an original state of purity for renewed energy and readiness for life.<br />

To judge from these trends toward healing in all sectors and aspects of Korean life, the answers to the<br />

1 cf. “Healing,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healing, accessed on September 22, 2012.<br />

12


questions we have asked a few moments ago seem to be a clear No. <strong>The</strong> miracle at Centum City has<br />

not brought happiness and fulfillment. This perception is corroborated by some interesting international<br />

statistics. Despite membership in the 20-50 Club, Korea ranks a distant 10<strong>2nd</strong> place with the Satisfaction<br />

with Life Index released in 2006, 2 an index of subjective well-being pioneered by an analytic psychologist<br />

at the University of Leicester correlating factors of health, wealth, and access to basic education. Denmark<br />

ranks the highest, Bhutan ranks at 8th place, the US at 23rd and East Timor at 69th, China at 8<strong>2nd</strong>, and<br />

Japan in 90th place. Korea does slightly better in the Human Development Index, 3 a composite statistic<br />

of life expectancy, education and income indices, published by UNDP. According to 2011 Human<br />

Development report, Korea ranks 28th with Norway in first place, France in 6th place and the US in 23rd<br />

place.<br />

In a comprehensive and enlightening paper given as the keynote address at the 11th International<br />

Conference on Philosophical Practice and Fourth International Conference on Humanistic <strong>The</strong>rapy,<br />

recently held in Chunchon, Korea, Sung-Jin Kim, a Korean philosopher who has been active in<br />

introducing philosophical practice in Korea, declares Korea is becoming a “therapy country”. 4 Presumably,<br />

he has made his judgment based on diagnosis that people are showing “more and more neurotic symptoms<br />

while they are trying to adjust themselves to all the dramatic changes of life style to the rapidly changing<br />

social environment”. 5<br />

Idea of philosophical practice or philosophical counseling began to be known to the public at large with<br />

the publication of the Koreans translation of Lou Marinoff’s Plato not Prozac 6 in 2000. Since then the idea<br />

spread quickly among Korean philosophers. <strong>The</strong> Korean Society of Philosophical Practice was founded<br />

in 2009, and has grown to the point of hosting the 11th international conference earlier this year. <strong>The</strong> idea<br />

of philosophical practice was further expanded into one of “humanities therapy” by scholars at Kangwon<br />

National University. With the support of the National Research Foundation of Korea, its <strong>Humanities</strong><br />

Institute has been conducting researches on humanities therapy through conferences, colloquia and<br />

researches into healing methods for mental and emotional problems. According to Sung-Jin Kim, the<br />

demand of philosophical counseling and therapy in Korea is so high and the number of people who need<br />

2 cf. “Satisfaction with Life Index,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satisfaction_with_Life_Index, accessed on September 22,<br />

2012.<br />

3 cf. “Human Development Index,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Deveopment_Index, accessed on September 22,<br />

2012.<br />

4 Sung-Jin Kim, “Philosophical Practice in Korea: A Short History, A New Approach,” Proceedings of the 11 th International<br />

Conference on Philosophical Practice and the 4 th International Conference on Humanistic <strong>The</strong>rapy, Vol. I, <strong>Humanities</strong><br />

Institute: Kangwon National University, p. 173.<br />

5 Ibid., p. 176.<br />

6 Lou Marinoff, Plato Not Prozac, New York: Harper Collins, 1999.<br />

13<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

philosophical help is growing so rapidly that “no hesitation is allowed for us philosophers in Korea.” 7<br />

A Revival of the <strong>Humanities</strong>?<br />

We must also consider the surprising surge in the demand for the humanities we are witnessing today. To<br />

what extent this phenomenon is connected with the all-encompassing call for healing is difficult to gauge.<br />

Prima facie, it is a surprising and unexpected phenomenon. As late as 2002, there was a public decision to<br />

establish a committee to study policies dealing with what was considered to be the crisis of the humanities<br />

and the proposed policies that would have the effect of promoting and putting life into humanistic studies.<br />

I myself chaired the committee for five years with an increasing sense of frustration, and I must say the<br />

results were far from satisfaction. Representative of the crisis atmosphere in university humanities circles<br />

was a declaration in 2006 by a group of professors in humanities departments that the foundations for<br />

very survival of the humanities were under threat due to the blind belief in the logic of the market and<br />

efficiency. <strong>The</strong> association of deans of humanities colleges followed up the declaration by warning that the<br />

crisis of the humanities could lay waste the dignity of human beings and the authenticity of human life.<br />

<strong>The</strong> response came, surprisingly, from the market itself. To call this a response to the agonized cries of<br />

the academics is perhaps misleading, since the demand for restructuring of universities of the neo-liberal<br />

provenance had come primarily from the market itself in the name of demand and efficiency. Market then<br />

began to notice how Steve Jobs, the icon of the business world, said he would give all the technologies<br />

of Apple in return for a single meal with Socrates. Over the last four to five years, humanities programs<br />

for CEOs have sprung up like mushrooms after the rain and some programs have become so competitive<br />

as to institute screening procedures to sift out those who are serious about the humanities and those who<br />

are not. Costs are sometimes prohibitively high, but they are sometimes subsidized by the companies<br />

themselves as legitimate extracurricular activities of their CEOs. <strong>The</strong> CEOs go through weeks of rigorous<br />

evening studying Socrates to Confucius, Machiavelli to Sun Zi, Hermann Hesse to Han Young Man,<br />

Marx to Beopjeong. Not only businessmen participate, there are people from the financial world and<br />

government bureaucracy, judges, lawyers, university presidents, medical doctors, journalists, church<br />

leaders, and artists.<br />

Some business groups have internal programs and seminars with emphasis on the humanities. One<br />

group recently organized a CEO strategy meeting with the title “Understanding of the <strong>Humanities</strong> and<br />

Leadership.” This is how the chairman of the group saw the rationale for the meeting. In this difficult time,<br />

7 Kim, op. cit., p. 172.<br />

14


what is important is how you can differentiate yourselves from other groups. <strong>The</strong> basis of differentiation<br />

lies on the understanding human being through the study of the humanities. Understanding what clients<br />

want and creating a creative and challenging work force – both of these tasks boil down to the problem of<br />

human beings. 8<br />

Is this what seems to be a see change in the attitude of Korean society toward the humanities for real?<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is certainly an element of adroit commercialism in this humanities phenomenon. But it seems to<br />

have spoken to a deep need in the minds of Korean people. In 2010, Michael Sandel’s What is Justice? in<br />

Korean translation sold over a million copies and his lectures filled the halls seating thousands. Earlier this<br />

year, the lectures by Slavoj Zizek, a Slovenian philosopher of Marxist provenance, met with a reception<br />

of similar enthusiasm. <strong>The</strong> audience consisted not only of students but of young people in their 20s and<br />

30s coming directly from work. Paradoxically, Zizek, the Marxist, was sponsored by a medium to low<br />

end clothing brand. <strong>The</strong>re are also lecture courses on various aspects of the humanities such as art, music,<br />

classics and philosophy organized by different foundations and local governments and most of them<br />

are overflowing with applicants. <strong>The</strong>re are also humanities and philosophy courses for prison inmates,<br />

homeless. Some who are engaged in the humanities and philosophy, traditionally disciplines which prided<br />

themselves in being secluded in the isolated splendor of the ivory tower now visit homes of single moms,<br />

conduct care programs for the North Korean refugees and international families.<br />

Telescoped Development and Borrowed Cultural Synthesis<br />

Are these phenomena somehow related, and if so, how? I believe one has to go back to the early days of<br />

Korea’s entry into Western civilization in seeking an answer to this question. Korean economic, political<br />

and social development has been so unprecedented in the contemporary world that it requires a deep a<br />

careful understanding. In such an understanding lies at least part of the answer regarding the role which<br />

the humanities and philosophy play or fail to play in today’s world.<br />

Exactly 136 years have passed since Korea opened its door to the West. <strong>The</strong> Treaty of Gangwha with<br />

Japan signed under duress in 1876 was the beginning of an end to Korea’s traditional civilizational<br />

allegiance to the Sino-centric world. Six years later, in 1882, Korea signed Treaty of Amity and Commerce<br />

with the US. With the signing of the treaty, Korea opened its door directly to the ascendant West for the<br />

first time in its history. <strong>The</strong>n in rapid succession, Korea signed treaties with Great Britain and Germany in<br />

1883 and Russia in 1884 and France in 1886.<br />

8 cf. Chosun Ilbo, October 17, 2012, B6.<br />

15<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Defeated in a confrontation of civilizations and suddenly confronted with the vitality of Western<br />

civilization during the latter half of the 19th century, we blamed our own political and cultural tradition for<br />

all the stagnancy, ineffectiveness and injustice in our society. To be sure, there were such men as Ki-Rak<br />

Kwak and Sun-Hak Yoon, who attempted to mediate between civilizations with such doctrines as dongdo-<br />

seogi, which, while recognizing importance of Western technology, seogi, such as canons, steam ship,<br />

railways and the telegraph, believed the Eastern way, dongdo, originating in Confucian ethical norms, was<br />

superior to the Western way. <strong>The</strong>y held that the Eastern way and Western technology could be separated<br />

from the original habitat and could be combined to meet the challenges of the West. But it was a classic<br />

case of too little, too late. We associated ignoble demise of Joseon Kingdom with a Confucian tradition<br />

rendered defunct by formalism, factionalism and a regressive world view. <strong>The</strong>n came to colonial distortion<br />

of the Korean cultural tradition as the record of mere subservience to China and therefore of no intrinsic<br />

value. <strong>The</strong> cultural synthesis that has been at the basis of political stability and cultural achievements was<br />

in deep disarray. Deprived of national dignity and history and the future, the de facto devaluation of our<br />

own tradition was deeply ingrained in the consciousness of the Korean people.<br />

We Koreans thus became a cultural tabula rasa and highly receptive to the political, social and cultural<br />

ideas and institutions that Americans brought with them after the defeat of Japan in the Second <strong>World</strong> War.<br />

<strong>The</strong> dissemination of these ideas and institutions and practices was all the more rapid and fundamental<br />

because they were part of the culture of a welcome liberator and later a powerful ally in the struggle for<br />

survival in the Korean War. <strong>The</strong>re was a ready-made cultural synthesis which promised a way forward<br />

to survival and flourishing. Intellectual and political leaders had neither the time nor need to choose<br />

with discrimination among the goods offered by the new culture. <strong>The</strong> course of economic and social<br />

development necessitated borrowing many Western experiences and technologies. American culture,<br />

identified with Western culture in the popular mind, seemed inevitable part of experience, with all its fads,<br />

fetishes, disorders and aberrations. To be sure, the Confucian norms and attitudes continue to govern to<br />

this day the daily behavior of Koreans at a deeper level. But as explicit cultural ideals, these norms were<br />

as good as dead. In a virtual cultural tabula rasa, the conception of American economy and politics found<br />

ready and enthusiastic acceptance in the mind of Koreans.<br />

Such an acceptance brought about, through a painful and tortuous process of trial and error and of<br />

simple hard work, a measure of realization of the visionary expectations of power and affluence. Korea<br />

has become a postindustrial society, unimaginable half a century ago. In this sense, the transformation<br />

at Centum City is truly a miracle. <strong>The</strong> transformation brought about is a fair replica of the industrial<br />

civilization that the West, particularly America, had succeeded in creating during the last century and<br />

half by systematizing countless technological inventions and improvements. It guaranteed for man a<br />

material existence at the level never before enjoyed. <strong>The</strong> phenomenal increase in productivity attained<br />

16


y institutionalizing the fruits of science and technology promise not only the satisfaction of man’s basic<br />

wants, but also promises of the creation of accumulated material wealth that would enable man to develop<br />

his potentialities to the full.<br />

In this process of telescoped development based on a borrowed cultural synthesis, there was no need and<br />

no place for humanistic thinking about the ideas and values underlying what was considered a defunct<br />

civilization. In moments of perplexity and need, we needed only to turn to the ready-made cultural<br />

synthesis for inspiration and instruction. Given Korea’s defeat this civilizational confrontation in the latter<br />

half of the 19th century, reducing many centuries of humanistic achievements to a mere pile of useless<br />

papers, who can be surprised at the fact that the classical disciplines of the humanities even in their<br />

imported form became wholesale “useless” disciplines, of interest only to those few who made it their<br />

profession. <strong>The</strong>re were of course some who made valiant efforts to revive the study of Korean history and<br />

philosophy, but colonialism saw to it that these efforts go nowhere.<br />

Fortunately for us Koreans, we were perhaps the last riders of the civilizational train that brought<br />

affluence, democracy and justice to a significant minority of people in the world. In 1945, Koreans<br />

adopted a civilization as embodied the American conception of economy, politics and culture. By that<br />

time, however, the inner dynamics and validity of this civilization were in disarray. <strong>The</strong> material and<br />

institutional side of the civilization was, to be sure, still basking in the splendor of high noon, but perhaps<br />

only of Indian summer. <strong>The</strong> intellectual and moral ideas and values of this civilization were undergoing,<br />

unnoticed except by a very few, a process disintegration and transformation. As early as 1888, the decade<br />

in which the treaty between Korea and the US was signed, and doors opened to the entrance of West into<br />

Korea, Friedrich Nietzsche wrote in the preface to his Will to Power thus:<br />

What I relate is the history of next two centuries, I describe what is coming, what can no longer<br />

come differently; the advent of nihilism. <strong>The</strong> future speaks even in hundred signs [...] For some<br />

time now our whole European culture has been moving toward a catastrophe, with a tortured<br />

tension that is growing from decade to decade; restlessly, violently, headlong like a river that wants<br />

to reach an end, that no longer reflect, and that is afraid to reflect. 9<br />

9 Friedrich Nietzsche, <strong>The</strong> Will to Power (ed. by Walter Kaufmann), 1967, p. 3, as quoted in Yersu Kim, “Interaction of<br />

Aesthetic and Intellectual Traditions” in Academy of Korean Studies and Woodrow Wilson Center, Reflections on a Century<br />

of United States-Korean Relations, New York and London: University Press of America, 1983, p. 110.<br />

17<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Boethius: <strong>The</strong> Consolation of Philosophy<br />

Healing, as I said a moment ago, is a restorative concept. Here two questions pose themselves. If healing<br />

is a restorative concept, what is the nature of the disease, damage and consequent suffering? What do we<br />

need to do to get back to the original state of normalcy and purity to which we would wish to be restored?<br />

To get a grip on these questions, I propose that we take another detour and go to Boethius’s <strong>The</strong><br />

Consolation of Philosophy. 10 It is a fifth century Roman protreptic or exhortation with a specifically<br />

religious message, written in the prosimetric form, a combination of prose and verse. Following the<br />

Renaissance and the Reformation the work was translated into many languages of Western Europe,<br />

including various translations into English, and remained a recommended reading for every educated<br />

person until well into the 20 th century.<br />

Born into one of the aristocratic families which dominated Roman life in the final decades of the fifth<br />

century, Boethius became the leading figure in the Roman establishment with power and prestige. He<br />

was then suddenly accused to treason, imprisoned, and was finally put to death. <strong>The</strong> circumstances of<br />

his trial and the death are not clear but it is probably during his imprisonment that Boethius wrote <strong>The</strong><br />

Consolation.<br />

Boethius is complaining bitterly about his unjust fall from power and grace. <strong>The</strong> figure of Philosophy<br />

appears and chases a way the muses of poetry who had been consoling him. Philosophy offers him a<br />

physician’s help. 11 In order to diagnose his ailment, Philosophy poses several questions to Boethius:<br />

whether the world is guided by the reason; to what end it proceeds; and what the essential nature of man<br />

is. 12 Though she finds Boethius’s answers less than satisfactory, Philosophy sees in them the hope for<br />

cure. Philosophy declares that she now knows “the further cause of your sickness, and it is a very serious<br />

one. You have forgotten your identity. So I have now fully elicited the cause of your illness, the means<br />

of recovering your health. […] Your true conviction of the government of the world provides us with the<br />

nourishment to restore you to health.” 13<br />

After a round of give and take with the prisoner, Philosophy comes to the conclusion that the defective<br />

10 Boethius, <strong>The</strong> Consolation of Philosophy (Translated and with an Introduction by P. G. Walsh), New York: Oxford University<br />

Press, 1999.<br />

11 Ibid., p. 8.<br />

12 Ibid., p. 13.<br />

13 Ibid., pp. 16-17.<br />

18


goods sought by human beings piecemeal are merely stages in the search for true good, which is the true<br />

means of happiness. This lies with God. Philosophy here makes an important point that defective goods<br />

sought piecemeal by humans must be gathered in unity. Philosophy makes the point that “the things<br />

sought by most men were not true or perfect goods… that the true good emerges when those aims are<br />

gathered into a single shape, so that sufficiency is identical with power, renown and pleasure. And indeed<br />

unless all are one and same they, have no claim to be counted among things worth seeking.” 14<br />

Step by step, Philosophy moves from the prisoners’ personal concerns and makes clear to him that<br />

consolation does not lie in prisoner’s attainment of mundane satisfaction. It lies rather in aspiring to<br />

and attaining knowledge of God, the Good. That knowledge will bring with it the realization that God<br />

orders all things justly. “So God is the highest good which governs all things peacefully, and orders them<br />

sweetly.” 15 A central feature of the freedom given to human beings is that they are able to choose their<br />

way. Humans cannot fully comprehend this process, but they are thus given the freedom to free himself<br />

from the shackles of earthly serfdom and rise to the contemplation of God.<br />

Civilizational malaise and cultural synthesis<br />

Does this early medieval language of exhortation to God have anything to teach us? In particular, what<br />

is the relevance of Boethius’s protreptic for the question we posed a few moments ago, namely what is<br />

the nature of sickness and suffering which philosophy and the humanities are called upon to heal? And<br />

how does he help us in conceptualizing the original state of purity and integrity toward which the healing<br />

should be directed?<br />

Once stripped of the early Christian language of the Roman era, it becomes clear that Boethius’s focusing<br />

on the discrepancy between values and ideas that are dominant in the society and the individual in need<br />

of healing. This can be seen in such questions as the relations between reason and governance, the final<br />

purpose of the world, and essential nature of man. This discrepancy results in the loss of identity for<br />

the individual. Philosophy’s final prescription and Boethius’s acceptance of it consist in seeing God<br />

as the embodiment of the One and the Good. <strong>The</strong> ideas are not just randomly selected ideas, but the<br />

essential part of the world in which a person lives and must live. And such a world order with ideas and<br />

values in coherent unity is represented as God. In secular language Boethius seems to be saying that it is<br />

civilizational analysis which gives consolation and healing to a person because he is suffering from what<br />

is essentially a civilizational malaise.<br />

14 Ibid., p. 62.<br />

15 Ibid., p. 67.<br />

19<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Culture and civilization of each time and place strive to forge optimal synthesis of ideas, values, and<br />

practices that would enable it to deal with the task of survival and flourishing. At some point in time and<br />

place, a synthesis thus achieved would be perceived by those inside as well as outside it to have achieved<br />

an optimal point, a reflective equilibrium in the process of interaction and interchange of ideas, values, and<br />

practices on the one hand, and recalcitrant but changeable reality on the other. A cultural synthesis thus<br />

achieved would be the basis of civilization.<br />

Such synthesis must constantly adapt its ideas, values, and practices to the ever changing or changed<br />

circumstance in order to function as the guide to survival and flourishing for humanity. Radical changes<br />

in the natural environment in which a particular civilization as situated may necessitate it. Some have<br />

been exterminated by imperialistic imposition. A civilization may lose a sense of direction at a certain<br />

stage of its development and may be confronted by another budding civilization that is more powerful and<br />

conceptually richer. <strong>The</strong> resulting transfer of allegiance, partial or total, may come through imperialism but<br />

it need not always be so, since the old civilizations may itself come to recognize its own inadequacies. 16<br />

In times of great transition and transformation, when the essential pillars of a civilization are in jeopardy,<br />

there would be serious grappling with historical and cultural alternatives before each culture, adopting and<br />

further developing some and discarding others. Danielle Eliseef, a French Sinologist, tells us about the<br />

“Confucian wave” 17 that gripped Europe in the last quarter of the 16 th century. When Histoire du Grande<br />

Royaume de la Chine by Juan Gonzalez de Mendoza was published in 1585, it became an immediate<br />

sensation and was translated into several European languages. Michel de Montaigne is said to have<br />

expressed his interest in a world much more “ample and diverse” than Europe and surpassing in some<br />

aspects the ancient civilizations of the Greeks and Romans. Matteo Ricci introduced Confucius to Europe.<br />

Chinese civilization continued to fascinate the Europeans in times of formation and evolution of a cultural<br />

synthesis in its early stage. One can only surmise what the result of the interaction between civilizations<br />

could have been had it continued its course unimpeded by other courses of events. What this “Confucian<br />

wave” shows clearly is the crucial importance of the humanities in the formation and evolution of cultural<br />

synthesis, which becomes the basis of civilization.<br />

16 cf. Yersu Kim, “<strong>The</strong> Idea of Cultural Identity and Problems of Cultural Relativism,”<br />

cf. Yersu Kim, “<strong>The</strong> Idea of Cultural Identity and Problems of Cultural Relativism,” Occasional Paper 40, Washington<br />

DC: <strong>The</strong> Woodrow Wilson Center, 1990.<br />

17 cf. Danielle Eliseef, “Les Valeurs Confuceenes: Un Ferment de l’Europe,” A Paper presented at a UNESCO conference<br />

cf. Danielle Eliseef, “Les Valeurs Confuceenes: Un Ferment de l’Europe,” A Paper presented at a UNESCO conference<br />

on “Dialogue Among Civilizations” in Paris, 2003, unpublished.<br />

20


Plea for Ecumenism in the <strong>Humanities</strong>: Human Sciences<br />

<strong>The</strong> nature of the damage, disease and suffering seems now clear enough. What we are suffering from and<br />

what is crying out for healing is civilizational. It is civilizational in the sense that many of the values, ideas<br />

and institutions that constitute the pillars of the cultural synthesis of the West that has served humanity<br />

so well in its task of survival and flourishing seem now to be increasingly irrelevant and sometimes<br />

counterproductive. Take, for example, conception regarding man’s relationship to nature. <strong>The</strong> Faustian<br />

will to shape the nature for the benefit of human being has been very strong in the cultural synthesis<br />

of the West. We are now in an ecological dead end and we do not know much about when and where<br />

the tipping point may be reached. Times we live in are times of great uncertainties. We speak of “risk<br />

societies” and “tired societies”. <strong>The</strong>se terms indicate the sense that we have entered an age of uncertainty<br />

and simply do now know what will come next as a result of many actions and ways of life that we thought<br />

we were conducting in a “rational way”. We witness in Korea as well as in other societies of the world<br />

many senseless and brutal killings and we agonize over them because we do now know why they have<br />

occurred and what in our interpersonal relations has gone wrong to make crimes of such inhumanity and<br />

heinousness happen. We seem to have lost our way and seem to be living in a “lost” society.<br />

I suspect at the bottom of the present surge in demand for the humanities lies a fumbling search for some<br />

kind of new cultural synthesis. <strong>The</strong> long, drawn out process of the demise of the cultural synthesis of the<br />

West which had been at the basis of the miracle at Centum City is manifesting in particularly painful ways<br />

in Korea. Korea’s place in the sun has been secured on a borrowed identity, a borrowed cultural synthesis.<br />

Korea’s development during the last half century has been telescoped one, achieving relative affluence<br />

within a span of time two or three times shorter than that required by other societies. In this sense, what<br />

happened at Centum City is truly a miracle, and not simply a mirage. Just a few days ago, as I was writing<br />

these lines, a review of a book, written by a British journalist, caught my attention. <strong>The</strong> book is entitled<br />

Korea: <strong>The</strong> Impossible Country. 18 Why an impossible country? Firstly, according to the author in the<br />

interview, Korea has created economic and political miracles. Secondly, because Koreans are setting for<br />

themselves the standards of achievement that are almost impossible to achieve.<br />

Be that as it may, many of the developments that are taking place in Korea, in economy, politics, and<br />

humanities are happening elsewhere too. But somehow they seem to appear writ large in Korea. Our<br />

sense of loss of direction and waywardness in Korea is only that much greater because we have only a<br />

distant memory of the agony of identity building and creation. Joseon dynasty, Korea’s last, was a locus<br />

18 Joongang Sunday, September 30 – October 1, 2012, p. 12.<br />

21<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

of political stability and cultural achievement because we have actively and creatively participated in the<br />

creation of a cultural synthesis that was the basis of an ecumenical Confucian world order for 500 years.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n the world turned topsy-turvy for Korea with a civilizational defeat by the Westernized Japan and<br />

then by the United States.<br />

<strong>The</strong> surge for the humanities may certainly have this element of being writ large. It is of course<br />

explainable partly by commercialism and the newly affluent’s taste for what looks like luxury. Hopeful<br />

sign is it is business enterprises which seem to be most serious about the humanities. It had been partly<br />

from the pressure of the market against “useless” learning that had led to the kind of restructuring<br />

of knowledge that occasioned the crisis of the humanities. Now the business leaders see that time of<br />

economic developments based on borrowed models of management and technology is over. <strong>The</strong>y see that<br />

they have to be creative in order to stay ahead and even just to survive. <strong>The</strong> problem boils down to the<br />

problem of human beings. Ergo, the humanities, the sciences of human beings par excellence.<br />

Today, sadly for us, there is no cultural model that can effectively replace the old. Signs of civilizational<br />

transformation are everywhere, and there seems to be a definite direction toward which certain economic<br />

and political trends are moving. But it is far from clear whether such shifts are merely signs of an<br />

extension of the refurbished cultural synthesis of the West or a truly transformational moment in the<br />

evolution of civilizations. Science and technology are creating an unheard of opportunities even as they<br />

threaten the very foundation of human life. <strong>The</strong> economic turmoil that began in 2007 and the tragic<br />

disasters at the nuclear power plants in Fukushima last year attest to human being’s terrifying helplessness<br />

to deal adequately with the consequences of what we have ourselves wrought. Today, computers are<br />

getting faster such that some point to the specific year, 2045, barely 33 years from now, as the year when<br />

the computers will have become capable of whatever it is our brains are capable of. Given exponentiation<br />

of the growth of computers, human mind will be quickly eclipsed by artificial intelligence and what lies<br />

beyond that threshold will be unfathomable for the human mind. 19<br />

If there is a healing mission for the humanities of today, it is the first and foremost in the creation of a<br />

cultural synthesis that would be adequate to deal with these problems. That would involve search and<br />

reflection on knowledge and wisdom that would give meaning to the relationship between nature and<br />

human beings, on how a just society can be envisaged in which freedom and equality play appropriate<br />

roles, how the relationship between the individuals and community in which he has existential roots<br />

should be conceptualized, how to conceive what ultimately constitute the meaning of life, and many more<br />

19 Cf. Lev Grossman, “Singularity,” Time, 177-7, February 2011, pp. 25-31.<br />

22


questions that animate the current intellectual debate.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se are times of challenge and opportunity for the humanities. It is clear that the humanities cannot<br />

exhaust itself as it is conceived in the modern bifurcation of knowledge into science and the humanities<br />

and its relegation to “lesser” part of knowledge. <strong>The</strong> humanities that would be adequate to the tasks of<br />

forging a cultural synthesis would need to be a more inclusive ecumenical activity, encompassing all the<br />

disciplines that contribute to understanding human beings and their lives, past, present and future. It would<br />

include not only ideographic classical humanistic studies but also the less nomothetic part of the social<br />

sciences and even some sciences such as genetics, artificial intelligence, and nano technology. It would<br />

be a call for the kind of knowledge sought after in movements such as consilience and convergence. <strong>The</strong><br />

label for such an ecumenical science of human beings could be “the human sciences”, les sciences de<br />

l’homme, in the tradition of Fernand Braudel. It would be “a single adventure of mind, not even just the<br />

obverse sides of a single cloth, but the entire cloth itself, in all the complexity of its threads.” 20<br />

Is this task “almost impossible” to achieve? <strong>The</strong>rein, I submit, lies the challenge for all of us who are<br />

engaged in the human sciences not only in Korea, but everywhere.<br />

20 Fernand Braudel, “Histoire et Sociologie,” In Fernand Braudel,<br />

Fernand Braudel, “Histoire et Sociologie,” In Fernand Braudel, Ecrits sur l’Histoire, Paris: Flammarion, 1969, pp.<br />

85-86, as quoted in Immanuel Wallerstein, <strong>The</strong> Uncertainties of Knowledge, Philadelphia: Temple University Press,<br />

p. 62.<br />

23<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Catharsis by Confronting the Past:<br />

Lessons of Germany’s Double Burden of Dictatorship<br />

Konrad H. Jarausch<br />

University of North Carolina<br />

One of the most vexing legacies of a defeated dictatorship is the question of what to do with its violations<br />

of human rights. During the “peaceful revolution” of 1989 in Eastern Europe, cautious voices warned<br />

against confronting Communist crimes so as to build a common future. <strong>The</strong>y argued that citizens could<br />

only reconcile with each other by letting bygones be bygones. None theless, the vic to rious dissidents<br />

opened the prison gates to free political victims who were cal ling for justice. Once the spell of secrecy<br />

was broken, the public also clamored for infor ma tion about who was responsible for its prior suffering.<br />

Moreover, the newly enfranchised me dia published scan da lous revelations about the corruption of those<br />

who abused their power for personal gain. So as to legitimize the transition to democratic rule some<br />

post-Communist go vern ments sought to expose the misdeeds of their predecessors. 1 <strong>The</strong>se conflicting<br />

approaches raise the funda mental question: Should a post-dictatorial country ignore prior crimes in order<br />

to move forward, or should it openly confront repression and atrocities in order to heal the pain?<br />

Especially in “pacted-transitions” like the democratization of Spain after the death of Gene ralissimo<br />

Franco, the impulse of forgetting has proven quite powerful. As compensation for giving up power<br />

peacefully, dictatorial elites have insisted not just on exemption from legal or economic punishment but<br />

on keeping their reputation unsullied, even if they knew full well that they had committed crimes. Former<br />

perpetrators and many collaborators argued that little would be gained by dwelling on their transgressions,<br />

because that would only continue internal con flicts. Rather than reopening old wounds, it would be much<br />

better just to forgive and forget in order to move on to a brighter future. For the sake of living in peace<br />

with one’s neighbors it see med sensible not to delve into their misdeeds under the dictator ship. Such<br />

1 A. James McAdams, ed., Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies (Notre Dame, 1997). Cf. also<br />

Helga Welsh, “When Discourse Trumps Policy: Transitional Justice in Unified Germany,” German Politics 15 (2007), pp.<br />

137-152.<br />

24


argu ments tended to find favor with groups who had something to hide while also appealing to a sense<br />

of generosity among the victors. 2 Hence some East European and Latin American coun tries de cided to<br />

forego transitional justice by maintaining a benevolent silence about prior crimes. 3<br />

In contrast, regime critics have argued quite insistently that lasting social peace could only be restored<br />

by openly confron ting the past, because then the ghosts could no longer haunt the living. In opposing<br />

impunity, victims of the military dictatorship in Argentina have stres sed the need to find out what hap-<br />

pened to the family members who simply disappeared, to dis cover the graves of murdered dissidents<br />

or to identify the chil dren who were taken from their parents so as to be able to mourn. 4 Most critical<br />

intellectuals emphasized the necessity of bringing per petra tors to justice in order to restore faith in the rule<br />

of law. <strong>The</strong>y argued that untold victims of repres sion and violence needed both personal consolation and<br />

financial compen sation for their de stroy ed lives. In the long run, so they reasoned, a stable democracy<br />

required open discussion rather than sweeping previous atrocities under the rug. <strong>The</strong>se claims rest both on<br />

the Christian teaching that forgiveness requires a prior confession of guilt and on the psychiatric theory<br />

that the soul can only achieve peace, if it honestly engages its own failings. 5<br />

For this debate, the German case is particularly instructive, since the Federal Republic has borne a<br />

double burden of dealing with two ideologically opposed dictatorships: After 1945, it had to confront the<br />

responsibility for unleashing the Second <strong>World</strong> War and perpetrating the mass murder of the Jews and<br />

Slavs in the Holocaust. After 1989, it had to deal with the ef fects of Communist repression that imprisoned<br />

GDR citizens behind the Wall. <strong>The</strong> effort to cope with the fascist past first coined the untranslatable<br />

term of Vergangenheitsbe wäl ti gung, i.e. mas ter ing the past, and later on the equally complex concept<br />

of Aufarbeitung, i.e. working through his tory. While the international community has made sure that<br />

the Germans would not escape their respon sibility for the Nazi crimes, internal pressure has kept the<br />

Communist violations of human rights in the public eye. Moreover, the success in creating a stable post-<br />

war democracy and the progress in reunifying a divided country have raised the question of what other<br />

count ries might be able to learn from the German effort to come to terms with its terrible past. 6<br />

2 Laura Desfor Edles, Symbol and Ritual in the New Spain: <strong>The</strong> Transition to Democracy After Franco (Cambridge, 1998).<br />

3 Monika Nalepa, Skeletons in the Closet: Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Europe (Cambridge, 2010).<br />

4 Carlos H. Acunia, “Transitional Justice in Argentina and Chile: A Never-Ending Story?” in John Elster, ed., Retribution<br />

and Reparation in the Transition to Democracy (Cambridge, 2006), pp. 206-238.<br />

5 Alexander Mitscherlich, <strong>The</strong> Inability to Mourn: Principles of Collective Behavior (New York., 1975) and Joachim<br />

Gauck, Winter im Sommer, Frühling im Herbst. Erinnerungen (Munich, 2009).<br />

6 <strong>The</strong>se remarks draw on Konrad H. Jarausch, “Memory Wars: German Debates about the Legacy of Dictatorship,” in John<br />

A. Williams, ed., Berlin Since the Wall’s End: Shaping Society and Memory in the German Metropolis since 1989 (Cambridge,<br />

2008), 90-109; and “Double Burden: <strong>The</strong> Politics of the Past and German Identity,” in Jörn Leonhard and Lothar<br />

Funk, eds., Ten Years of German Unification: Transfer, Transformation, Incorporation? (Birmingham, 2002).<br />

25<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

In order to explore whether to forget or to confront history, the following remarks will briefly examine<br />

the German struggle over coping with its dictatorial histories. <strong>The</strong>se reflections will trace the evolution of<br />

memory culture rather than legal and administrative measures, since a public understanding of the past<br />

forms the basis for most judicial sentences and political deci sions. 7 First I shall focus on the laborious<br />

process of coming to terms with Nazi crimes which took decades to complete, since the establishment of a<br />

self-critical view had to overcome much public resis tan ce. <strong>The</strong>n I shall take a look at the post-unification<br />

dis cus sions about the Com mu nist dictatorship in East Germany which are still in progress since they<br />

are more recent, engen dering strong emotions in the new federal states. <strong>The</strong>reafter I shall address the<br />

competition between the efforts to deal with the Nazi and Communist legacies in order to point out how<br />

the different memory regimes have influenced one another. And finally I shall conclude with some general<br />

comments on the relationship between truth, justice and reconciliation.<br />

1) Confronting Nazi Crimes<br />

Learning to deal openly with the horrible crimes committed by the Third Reich was a long and contested<br />

process, because the establishment of a critical approach to the past had to overcome strong public<br />

resistance. In order to prevent another <strong>World</strong> War, the victorious allies instituted a program of reorientation<br />

during the Potsdam Conference that sought to transform the defeated country’s entire political culture by<br />

“demilitarization, denazification and decar te li za tion.” When they returned from emigration, concentration<br />

camps and inner exile, the German opponents of the Nazi regime also insisted on a fresh start by repu di-<br />

ating the dangerous tradi tions of militarism, nationalism and authoritarianism which had brought about the<br />

cata strophe. But the majority of the population remembered the prewar years as a “good time” and refused<br />

to address its own complicity in the brutality of the war, the persecution of the Jews and the ex ploitation of<br />

the slave laborers. While official pronouncements admitted German guilt, private memories instead dwelt<br />

on their own suffering during and after the collapse. 8<br />

<strong>The</strong> military defeat of Hitler’s regime permitted the victorious Allies to combat Nazi propaganda myths<br />

by revealing the full extent of the atrocities perpetrated in the German name. <strong>The</strong> demobilization of the<br />

military machine, the dissolution of the Nazi Party, and the deconcen tra tion of the war industries sought to<br />

discredit militarism, displace party members and dis man tle the economic basis of aggression. Compulsory<br />

visits to nearby concentration camps and films of the skeletal survivors also demonstrated of inhumanity<br />

of Nazi policies to shocked German civilians. But it took the much publicized Nuremberg Trial of the<br />

7 Timothy Garton Ash, “Trials, Purges, and History Lessons: Treating a Difficult Past in Post-Communist Europe’, in Jan-<br />

Werner Müller, ed., Memory and Power in Post-War Europe: Studies in the Presence of the Past (Cambridge, 2002).<br />

8 Jeffrey Herf, Divided Memory: <strong>The</strong> Nazi Past in the Two Germanies (Cambridge, 1997).<br />

26


Nazi leaders and the subsidiary cases against the SS, the captains of industry and the medical profession in<br />

order to make public the full extent of war crimes. Moreover “crimes against humanity” had to be added<br />

as a new category so as to punish the genocide of Jews and Slavs. In order to sustain their in dictments,<br />

the prosecutors amassed an enormous amount of evidence in official documents and personal testimony<br />

which proved the murderousness of the NS-dictatorship beyond any doubt. 9<br />

Most of the Germans responded to the presumed accusation of “collective guilt” with incredulity and<br />

resentment, instead blaming the top Nazis for their misfortune. Excuses such as “I was just following<br />

superior orders,” “we did not know anything about the crimes” or “the other countries also did bad<br />

things” were popular, because they diminished personal res pon si bi lity. Though designed to establish the<br />

degree of individual guilt, the denazification process gra dually turned into a white-washing when most of<br />

its judgments classified perpetrators as mere fel low-travelers. While the Protestant Church admitted some<br />

failing in its Stuttgart declara tion, conser vative bishops and the Catholic hierarchy pleaded for the release<br />

of generals con victed of war crimes. Moreover, many collaborators who had been interned or lost their<br />

job were eventu ally reintegrated into government service through a general amnesty. Though Chancellor<br />

Konrad Adenauer courageously offered restitution to the Jewish community, the bulk of the electorate<br />

wanted the “politics of the past” to stop any further legal prosecution and debate. 10<br />

<strong>The</strong> renewed confrontation with the Nazi crimes in the FRG during the early 1960s came as somewhat<br />

of a surprise, because it went counter to public sentiment. Since the formulaic anti-Fascism of the<br />

GDR served to justify the dictatorship of the SED, many West Germans dismissed charges that old<br />

Nazis still held power as Eastern propaganda. But a series of highly publicized court cases such as the<br />

Einsatzgruppen trial in Ulm, the Eichmann trial in Jerusalem and the Ausch witz trial in Frankfurt drew<br />

public attention once again to the criminal past. Based on incri mi na ting documentary evidence and<br />

touching survivor testimonies, a minority of pro gres s ive jurists like Fritz Bauer decided to prosecute<br />

perpetrators before the statute of limitations would make legal action impossible. <strong>The</strong> establishment of<br />

a central clearing office in Ludwigs burg helped to assemble material for further court cases. Moreover,<br />

famous writers such as Hein rich Böll in his short stories, Günter Grass in the Tin Drum, Peter Weiss<br />

in his staging of the Ausch witz trial and Ralf Hochhut in the play <strong>The</strong> Deputy also issued searing<br />

9 Astrid M. Eckert, <strong>The</strong> Struggle for the Files: <strong>The</strong> Western Allies and the Return of the German Archives after the Second<br />

<strong>World</strong> War (Cambridge, 2012).<br />

10 Norbert Frei,<br />

Norbert Frei, 1945 und wir: Das Dritte Reich im Bewusstsein der Deutschen (Munich, 2005). See also Philipp Gassert<br />

and Alan E. Steinweis, eds., Coping with the Nazi Past: West German Debates on Nazism and Generational Conflict,<br />

1955-1975 (New York, 2006).<br />

27<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

indictments. 11<br />

<strong>The</strong> overwhelming response to the US TV series on the Holocaust, aired in the Federal Republic in<br />

January 1979, reinforced this critical turn. Liberal media like Die Zeit, and Der Spiegel had already<br />

prepared the ground with their honest reporting, while an entire rebellious generation which had grown<br />

up since the Third Reich kept asking “Daddy, what did you do during the war?” <strong>The</strong> American TV<br />

series, directed by Marvin J. Chomsky, was so effective because it did not treat the murder of the Jews<br />

didactically, but used the form of a soap opera to dramatize the gruesome fate of the putative Weiss family<br />

of a Berlin doctor, hunted by a bureau cratic SS killer named Dorf. Seen by 10-15 million viewers, about<br />

a quarter of the West German TV audience, the miniseries, portrayed by gifted actors like Meryl Streep<br />

showed the entire trajectory of increa sing discrimination, killing by bullets, extermi nation in Auschwitz<br />

and painful survival. This dramatization evoked such an emotional response that the Bundestag was<br />

forced to extend the statute of limitation and the term Holocaust entered into the German debate. 12<br />

Local efforts to uncover traces of persecution and the transformation the concentration camps into public<br />

memorials supported the growing Holocaust sensibility by making the effects of Anti-Semitism visible.<br />

<strong>The</strong> methodological shift from an abstract “history of society” to a more tangible “everyday history”<br />

inspired historians and amateurs to research the effects of per secu tion where they lived, revealing a<br />

universe of forgotten Nazi detention facilities. Arresting the decay of former concentration camps, this<br />

increas ing public interest transformed sites of suffer ing like Buchenwald or Da chau into impressive public<br />

memorials. Ironically East and West Ger many began to compete by offering different versions of a critical<br />

approach, with the GDR extol ling the Com munist resistance and the FRG stressing the racist nature of<br />

genocide. 13 Grass-roots initiatives like Stolpersteine or plaques to murdered Jews on their former houses<br />

made the process of discrimination and the loss of Jewish culture visible. As a result, educated young Ger-<br />

mans identified with the racial victims and developed a diffuse sense of philosemitism.<br />

Yet among the older generation and the political right signs of discomfort con tinued to emerge which<br />

demonstrated an unwillingness to be self-critical. During the post-war decades an unofficial subculture<br />

of veteran reunions and rightist publications (Landserheftchen) maintained a more positive recollection<br />

of Wehrmacht exploits during the war. Fortunately the various neo-Nazi parties, initially forbidden but<br />

11 Annette Weinke,<br />

Annette Weinke, Die Verfolgung von NS-Tätern im geteilten Deutschland: Vergangenheitsbewältigung 1949-1969, oder<br />

eine deutsch-deutsche Beziehungsgeschichte im kalten Krieg (Paderborn, 2002).<br />

12 Peter Reichel<br />

Peter Reichel Erfundene Erinnerung - Weltkrieg und Judenmord in Film und <strong>The</strong>ater (Munich, 2004).<br />

13 Harold Marcuse,<br />

Harold Marcuse, Legacies of Dachau: <strong>The</strong> Uses and Abuses of a Concentration Camp 1933-2001 (New York, 2001);<br />

and David A. Hackett, <strong>The</strong> Buchenwald Report (Boulder, CO, 1995).<br />

28


esurrected in a tamer guise, never received enough votes to get into the federal parliament. But moderate<br />

politicians like Helmut Kohl also made occa sional missteps such as meeting with President Reagan<br />

in the Bitburg military cemetery which con tained Waffen-SS graves. When traditionalist scholars such<br />

as Ernst Nolte sought to relativize German crimes by pointing to the prior Stalinist mass murders as<br />

inspiration, they set off a fierce quarrel among the historians (Historikerstreit). 14 While liberal intel lectuals<br />

ultimately prevailed in main taining the critical consensus of public discourse, they were unable to stop the<br />

development of a xenophobic skin-head subculture among disenchanted youths.<br />

<strong>The</strong> post-unification tendency towards claiming victimization also revealed a desire to revise the critical<br />

memory regarding the Third Reich. In his Frankfurt Peace Price speech the writer Martin Walser ques-<br />

tioned whether Auschwitz ought to be used any longer as “moral club” for beating the Ger mans, pro-<br />

vok ing censure from Ignatz Bubis, the head of the Jewish commu nity. <strong>The</strong> novelist W. G. Se bald and the<br />

journa list Jörg Friedrich also called attention to the suf fering of German civilians during the “fire-storm”<br />

of Allied bombing, which had previously been somewhat neglected. Simi larly Günter Grass pointed to the<br />

plight of over 12 million fleeing from the Red Army in 1945 and expelled from their homes in the East<br />

in order to blunt the call of the Union of Refugees for a separate memorial to “flight and expulsion.” 15<br />

Pointing to Ger man suf fering during the War needed not to diminish responsibility for Nazi crimes, if its<br />

cau ses were clearly kept in mind. Chancellor Kohl suggested a compromise with the revised inscription of<br />

the Berlin war memorial Neue Wache which now pays tribute to all “Victims of War and Tyranny.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> erection of the new Holocaust Memorial close to the Brandenburg Gate, none theless, showed that<br />

self-criticism was here to stay. Though institu tions like the Topography of Terror or the Jewish Museum<br />

already addressed the topic, the redoubtable journalist Lea Rosh and the historian Eberhard Jäckel<br />

organized a citizens’ initiative which convinced Helmut Kohl that a symbolic expression of German guilt<br />

was needed in the new capital. In spite of much criticism directed against the necessity of further contrition<br />

as well as against its artistic form, Kohl chose the concept proposed by the architects Peter Eisenman and<br />

Richard Serra, which resem bled a Jew ish cemetery with 2,711 tomb-like columns of polished concrete.<br />

After an under ground “place of information” was added so as to help visitors decode the site’s meaning,<br />

the Bundestag voted the funds, and construction was completed in 2004. <strong>The</strong> memorial’s massive size and<br />

location close to the Bundestag created a permanent presence in the center of government, suggesting that<br />

14 Charles S. Maier,<br />

Charles S. Maier, <strong>The</strong> Unmasterable Past: History, Holocaust and German National Identity (Cambridge, MA, 1988).<br />

15 Thomas A. Kovach and Martin Walser, eds.,<br />

Thomas A. Kovach and Martin Walser, eds., <strong>The</strong> Burden of the Past: Martin Walser on Modern German Identity (Rochester,<br />

NY, 2008); Jörg Friedrich, <strong>The</strong> Fire: <strong>The</strong> Bombing of Germany, 1940-1945 (New York, 2006); Günter Grass,<br />

Crabwalk (Orlando, FL, 2002).<br />

29<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

national identity could be reconciled with a sense of guilt. 16<br />

2) Coping with Communist Repression<br />

<strong>The</strong> effort to deal with the Communist dictatorship was both similar to and different from the<br />

confrontation with the Nazi crimes. On the one hand, the regimes resembled each other as one-party<br />

dictatorships, supported by a well-oiled pro pagan da machine and a powerful secret service, which<br />

violated human rights. On the other, the GDR was a Soviet satellite, covered only one third of Germany,<br />

lasted three times as long and killed many fewer victims. In fact, its Communist ideology of egalitarian<br />

internationalism was diametrically opposed to the Fascist dreams of racist imperialism. 17 This perplexing<br />

mixture of resemblance and antagonism was bound to compli cate the process of dealing with the second<br />

German dictatorship which tried to avoid the earlier mistake of reluctant engagement by insisting on a<br />

more thorough reckoning from the beginning. Although emotions continue to run high in the East due to<br />

conflicting me mories of the GDR, the twentieth anniversary of the fall of the Wall in 2009 has created an<br />

incipient consensus by establishing the notion of a “peaceful revolution” in the public mind.<br />

<strong>The</strong> quest for free speech as a fundamental human right was already part and parcel of the demo cratic<br />

awakening of 1989, seeking to tear the veil of secrecy from the SED regime. <strong>The</strong> most popular citizens’<br />

initiative of the fall was the “New <strong>Forum</strong>” which proclaimed the need for an open discussion of the<br />

problems confronting the GDR, thereby trying to restore an indepen dent public sphere in which citizens<br />

could articulate their wishes. After ousting the dictator Erich Honecker, his successor Egon Krenz was<br />

forced to initiate a policy of “public dialogue” that gradually escaped his control. At the same time, the<br />

media threw off its prior censorship, with state television suddenly presenting unvarnished news and<br />

newspapers scandalizing the cor rupt life-style of the Socialist Unity Party in its suburban ghetto Wandlitz.<br />

<strong>The</strong> party’s pri vileges such as a separate grocery store, an indoor swimming pool or a hunting preserve<br />

seemed rather modest by Western standards. Propelled by freed victims of the regime, critical reckon ing<br />

with the GDR past therefore originated already during the overthrow of the SED. 18<br />

<strong>The</strong> records of repression became an important bone of contention during the post-dicta torial transition.<br />

When the secret service began to shred and burn its documents, alert dissi dents occupied its regional<br />

16 Jan-Holger Kirsch,<br />

Jan-Holger Kirsch, Nationaler Mythos oder historische Trauer? Der Streit um ein zentrales „Holocaust-Mahnmal“ für<br />

die Berliner Republik (Cologne, 2003). Cf. www.holocaust-denkmal-berlin.de.<br />

17 Günter Heydemann and Eckart Jesse, eds.,<br />

Günter Heydemann and Eckart Jesse, eds., Diktaturvergleich. <strong>The</strong>orie und Praxis (Berlin, 1998).<br />

18 Konrad H. Jarausch,<br />

Konrad H. Jarausch, Die Unverhoffte Einheit 1989/90 (Frankfurt, 1995); and Charles S. Maier, Dissolution: <strong>The</strong> Crisis<br />

of Communism and the End of East Germany (Princeton,1997).<br />

30


offices in December 1989 and when it leaked out that the Stasi was trying to survive by changing its name,<br />

the opposition stormed its Berlin headquarters in mid-January. Though the foreign espionage branch HVA<br />

succeeded in destroying its files and the Modrow government authorized the purging of personnel records,<br />

the dissidents captured kilo meters of files, documenting the prior repression in great detail. A curious<br />

alliance of the Eas tern com munist perpetrators and the West German government, afraid of disclosing<br />

their re spect ive secrets, wanted to seal or destroy this evidence. But the civic movement engaged in a dra-<br />

ma tic hunger strike in order to preserve the written record of injustice. In the end, the dissidents succeeded<br />

and the Bundestag established a special office for Stasi files (BStU) that offered access to victims and<br />

scholars, thereby laying an archival basis for a critical memory. 19<br />

<strong>The</strong> political confrontation with the SED-regime culminated in a “commission of inqui ry” which sought to<br />

discredit the Communist dictatorship. Meeting from 1992 to 1998, this parlia mentary Enquetekommission<br />

was dedicated to “Examining the History and Consequences of the SED-Dictatorship.” In a series of<br />

widely-publicized hearings, politicians, eye-witnesses and aca demic experts discussed the structures<br />

of the SED-regime in order to destroy apologetic myths and enlighten the public about the repressive<br />

character of the GDR. Since they revealed secrets such as the shady economic dealings of Alexander<br />

Schalck-Golodkowski, the televised discus sions reached a considerable audience. While conservative<br />

anti-Communists and regime victims painted a dark picture of the East German state, post-Communist<br />

partisans sought to defend its record as socially innovative, whereas moderate commentators tried to<br />

make sense of the many contradictions between humane goals and inhumane policies. Eventually, the<br />

Bundestag created a foundation to carry on with public education and historical research. 20<br />

Legal efforts to punish perpetrators and compensate victims turned out to be just as diffi cult after<br />

Communism as after Nazism, because they were constrained by the rule of law. Court ca ses were based<br />

on GDR laws as long as they did not conflict with FRG provisions, while for eign spies were excluded<br />

altogether, since Markus Wolf claimed that they were no different than the sleuths of the West. As a result,<br />

thousands of investigations led to hundreds of cases, but yiel ded only a few dozen convictions. It was<br />

easier to condemn border guards for shooting es ca pees at the Wall than to punish Stasi-chief Erich Mielke<br />

or the head of the security commit tee Krenz for their political responsibility. Organized in pressure groups,<br />

the victims clamored for re ha bili tation and com pen sation through laws “to undo the injustice.” While<br />

about 200,000 people received some payment for prior suffering, it proved more difficult to handle the<br />

19 Joachim Gauck,<br />

Joachim Gauck, Die Stasi-Akten. Das unheimliche Erbe der DDR (Reinbeck,1991).<br />

20 Andrew Beattie,<br />

Andrew Beattie, Playing Politics with History: <strong>The</strong> Bundestag Inquiries into East Germany (New York, 2008). Cf. www.<br />

stiftung-aufarbeitung.de.<br />

31<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

more than one million claims for restitution of lost property. 21 As a result the high hopes for justice were<br />

often dash ed by the cold reality of legal procedure, leaving both perpetrators and victims dissatisfied.<br />

Resentment against blanket condemnation and Western lack of understanding triggered a nostalgic reflex,<br />

called Ostalgie, which made the GDR seem more attractive in retrospect than it had been in reality.<br />

Not surprisingly, former regime members in the party, the military or the security organs became rather<br />

defensive, feeling victimized by Western media, and voted for the post-Communist PDS. Intellectuals,<br />

who often had lost their jobs due to their ideological taint, clustered around the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung<br />

in a separate scholarly subculture, deba ting the reasons why Communism had failed. <strong>The</strong> majority of<br />

East Germans regretted the loss of their objects of daily life, which they had precipitated by switching to<br />

Western goods. <strong>The</strong>re fore, a series of Ostshops started to revive familiar Eastern brands, offering the new<br />

citizens a sense of regional continuity across the rupture. Curiously enough, many Easterners failed to<br />

distinguish between criticism of the regime and their own lives, gradually replacing their recollections of<br />

shortage and repression with an illusion of a warm solidarity in the GDR. 22<br />

Artistic efforts to come to terms with the Communist past have presented more complex renditions of<br />

life under the SED dictatorship, seeking to balance the old security with the new freedom. A spate of<br />

autobiographical texts like Jana Hensel’s Zonenkinder described the transi tion from a regulated but<br />

protected GDR childhood to the excitement and insecurity of Western life-styles. Some authors like the<br />

film-directors of Sonnenallee or Goodbye Lenin took recourse to irony while contrasting the claims and<br />

realities of the East and the West with each other, using a light touch in order to explore the ambivalences<br />

of the two sys tems. 23 Other writers like Uwe Tellkamp of Der Turm or directors like Henkel von Donners-<br />

marck of <strong>The</strong> Lives of Others employed a more dramatic voice so as to portray the suffering of victims<br />

in the GDR, suggesting that the SED-dictatorship was not just a friendly summer camp. Intellec tuals like<br />

Christa Wolf have offered a whole spectrum of recollections, ranging from a defense of so cial ist ideals to<br />

an indictment of repressive practices – sometimes even within the same text. 24<br />

Less than one generation after the collapse of Communism, the academic controversy between harsh<br />

condemnation and sympathetic understanding of the GDR remains unresolved. Internal and external<br />

opponents interpret the SED regime as a brutal dictatorship, implanted by the Red Army, which violated<br />

21 A. James McAdams, Judging the Past in Unified Germany (Cambridge, 2001).<br />

22 Daphne Berdahl, “’(N)Ostalgia’ for the Present: Memory, Longing, and East German Things,” Ethnos (1999), pp. 192-<br />

211.<br />

23 Jill E. Twark, Humor, Satire and Identity: Eastern German Literature in the 1990s (Berlin, 2007).<br />

24 Klaus Scherpe, “After “After After the the GDR? GDR? Restoring Restoring Literature’s Literature’s Standing,” Standing,” in in Konrad Konrad H. H. Jarausch, Jarausch, ed., ed.,<br />

United Germany: Debating<br />

Processes and Prospects (New York, 2013).<br />

32


human rights in order to retain power. <strong>The</strong>y have revived the theory of totalitarianism, originally<br />

developed by German émigrés like Hannah Arendt, in order to equate the anti-democratic nature of<br />

Fascism with Communism. In contrast post-Communist intellectuals tend to defend the Enlightenment<br />

derived idealism of Socialism as a progressive quest for an egalitarian utopia. But they need to explain<br />

when and why this noble experiment failed in the end. Instead, more moderate scholars, supported by<br />

Anglo-American academics, empha size the tensions between the unquestioned dictatorial features of SED<br />

control and the relatively normal daily lives of East Germans as constitutive. <strong>The</strong> concept which I have<br />

sugges ted in order to reconcile this contradiction is the notion of a “welfare dictatorship.” 25<br />

This disagreement is also visible in the cleavages of the memory landscape of museums and exhibitions<br />

that deal with the GDR. On the one hand, condemnations of the Unrechts staat have motivated the<br />

transformation of former prisons like in Hohenschönhausen or the Linden strasse in Potsdam into<br />

memorials of brutal repression in which victims talk about their terrible suffer ing. On the other hand, the<br />

experience of everyday life in the East has inspired apolitical presen tations like the GDR-museum at the<br />

Spree or nostalgic impulses like the Trabi tours in Berlin. In order to meet the interests of world-wide<br />

tourists, the Berlin Senate has developed a “decentra lized Wall concept” which preserves a few remnants<br />

of the divisive barrier and drama tizes their effect in a special memorial at the Bernauer Strasse. Most<br />

controversial remains the fu ture of the crossing point at Checkpoint Charlie, since its commercialism<br />

clashes with plans for the construction of an international Cold War Museum to explain the world-wide<br />

context. <strong>The</strong> ultimate shape which the memorialization of the GDR will take is therefore still unclear. 26<br />

3) Reconciling Competing Memories<br />

<strong>The</strong> development of critical approaches to the past has been complicated by the ideo lo gical competition<br />

between anti-Fascism and anti-Communism as the foundation for a func tion ing democracy. Even if<br />

Fascism fortunately disappeared with the defeat of Hitler and Mussolini, other authoritarian regimes and<br />

military dictatorships of the Right have taken its place around the globe. Similarly, Communism has been<br />

overthrown from below in Eastern Europe and Rus sia, but developmental dictatorships of the Left are<br />

still in power from Cuba to North Korea, and with some economic modification in China and Vietnam.<br />

Developed as a form of resistance during the 1930s, anti-Fascism remains the ideological basis for leftist<br />

ideology, abhorring all forms of exploitation and repression. At the same time, the Cold War reflex of anti-<br />

Communism is still a powerful motive force for conservatives who fear social leveling and various kinds<br />

25 Konrad H. Jarausch, ed.,<br />

Konrad H. Jarausch, ed., Dictatorship as Experience: Towards a Socio-Cultural History of the GDR (New York, 1999).<br />

26 Martin Sabrow, ed.,<br />

Martin Sabrow, ed., Wohin treibt die DDR-Erinnerung? Dokumentation einer Debatte (Bonn, 2007); and Klaus-Dietmar<br />

Henke, ed., Die Mauer. Errichtung, Überwindung, Erinnerung (Munich, 2012).<br />

33<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

of experiments. 27 Since both ideologies clash in the Federal Republic, the German case has impor tant<br />

implications for the world wide debate about developing a critical memory.<br />

<strong>The</strong> territorial division of memory regimes has hampered the global spread of the prin ciple of histo rical<br />

self-criticism. Western and Central Europe primarily remember the bru ta lity of the Nazi occupation,<br />

therefore attributing, like the Dutch, the respon sibility for all suffering to the Germans. <strong>The</strong> myth of the<br />

résistance in France allowed the restoration of democratic go vern ment by ignoring the evidence of mass<br />

collaboration, punished in a wave of épuration after li ber ation. Only gradually were critical scholars<br />

like Robert Paxton from the US or Henry Rousso in France able to dismantle the “Vichy syndrome” by<br />

pointing out that most Frenchmen had coope rated with the German occupiers, and the Laval government<br />

had even turned over tens of thou sands of hapless Jews to be annihilated in Auschwitz. 28 This growing<br />

Holocaust sensibility has made the racist violation of human rights a central international concern. Hence,<br />

acknowledge ment of the Holo caust has emerged as a new standard of civilized conduct, symbolically<br />

reaf fir med by the Stockholm declaration that it “must be forever seared in our collective memory.” 29<br />

In Eastern Europe, memory debates are instead dominated by the recollection of suf fer ing from Soviet<br />

atrocities, sometimes even downplaying the cooperation of local auxili aries in Nazi murder. This fixation<br />

on the misdeeds of the Communists is understandable, since their wounds are more recent and the<br />

discrepancy is greater between the liberationist rhetoric of anti-Fascism and the Red Army practice of<br />

rape, pillage and repression. <strong>The</strong> effort to legitimize na tio nal independence also involves pointing to<br />

Russian crimes, inspiring accusations of mass star vation during the Holodomor in the Ukraine and of the<br />

vicious repression of Hungarian wish es for independence in 1956, dramatized in the “House of Terror” in<br />

Buda pest. In cont rast to the courageous democratic activists around Memorial, the majority of patrio tic<br />

Russians and Bela rusians remain in deep denial about Stalinist crimes, preferring to cele brate their victory<br />

in the “Great Fatherland’s War” over the Fascist aggressors. Recent research has none theless poin ted out<br />

that in the Eastern “bloodlands” Soviet murder rivaled the beastliness of Nazi killing. 30<br />

In many ways the German case is unique, because there the debates about the Holo caust and the Stalinist<br />

crimes overlap, engendering an exceptionally critical memory cul ture. Compared to the nationalist<br />

27 Francois Furet, <strong>The</strong> Passing of an Illusion: <strong>The</strong> Idea of Communism in the Twentieth Century (Chicago, 1999).<br />

28 Robert O. Paxton, Vichy France: Old Guard, New Order. 1940-1944 (New York, 1972); and Henry Rousso, <strong>The</strong> Vichy<br />

Syndrome: History and Memory in France since 1944 (Cambridge, MA, 1991).<br />

29 Stockholm declaration https://www.holocausttaskforce.org/about-the-itf/stockholm-declaration.html<br />

30 Claus Leggewie, Der Kampf um die europäische Erinnerung. Ein Schlachtfeld wird besichtigt (Munich, 2011). Cf. KonKonrad H. Jarausch and Thomas Lindenberger, eds., Conflicted Memories: Europeanizing Contemporary Histories (New<br />

York, 2007).<br />

34


tendency to downplay the Nanking massacre in Japan and the Italian penchant for claiming that everyone<br />

resisted the Fascists, international and domestic pres sure has forced Germany to confront its ugly past<br />

as chief perpetrator of the Holocaust. 31 <strong>The</strong> latest instance of this mechanism was the debate about the<br />

compensation of Slave Labo rers, which led to the establishment of a business and government foundation,<br />

paying out bil lions of Euros to survivors. At the same time the fall of the Wall has also compelled<br />

Germans to deal with the le gacy of Communist crimes, since tens of thousands of SED-victims de man ded<br />

legal punish ment as well as material aid. <strong>The</strong> internal effort to integrate the new citi zens during unification<br />

therefore sparked heated discussions about Stalinist repression. As a result, the Germans were forced to<br />

address the relationship between these two sets of memories.<br />

One way of resolving the competition between Fascist and Communist memories con sisted of looking<br />

more closely at the repressive practices of both dictatorships on the ground. Surprisingly enough, both<br />

the Nazis and the SED used the same places such as the concen tra tion camps of Buchen wald and Sach-<br />

senhausen or estab lished prisons in Bautzen, Brandenburg or Halle to incarcerate their opponents. As<br />

a result, two groups of victims now compete for erec t ing memo rials on the same sites, seek ing to high-<br />

light their particular suffering so as to establish the priority of their ideological mes sage. Ironically the<br />

patterns of persecution by pro secutors and informants, the harsh treatment of inmates, and the disinterest<br />

of outsiders were rather si mi lar under both regimes. Moreover, some Commu nists imprisoned under the<br />

Nazis sub se quent ly turned into guards while some NS-jailers found themselves imprisoned afterwards. 32<br />

Rather than quarreling about the primacy of anti-Fascism and anti-Communism, this resem blance<br />

suggests that it would be more constructive to pay attention to their actual relationship.<br />

Another method of dealing with the paradox would be to emphasize that both the Nazi and SED<br />

dictatorships were antidemocratic regimes, proposing alternatives to Western forms of moder nity. <strong>The</strong><br />

revival of totalitarianism theory after the fall of the Wall highlighted the structural similarities of the one-<br />

party dictatorships in terms of the political science criteria of Carl Fried rich. Critics, however, quickly<br />

pointed out that such an approach risked equating two hostile re gi mes which had fought each other in the<br />

Second <strong>World</strong> War and committed different kinds of crimes such as racist ethnic extermination versus<br />

class-based killing by starvation and labor. As a result, scholars have turned to comparing both dicta tor-<br />

ships systematically in a Dikta tur ver gleich so as to establish where they resembled each other or where<br />

31 Richard J. B. Bosworth,<br />

Richard J. B. Bosworth, Explaining Auschwitz and Hiroshima: History Writing and the Second <strong>World</strong> War (New York,<br />

1993); Ian Buruma, <strong>The</strong> Wages of Guilt: Memories of War in Germany and Japan (New York, 1994).<br />

32 Gabriele Schnell,<br />

Gabriele Schnell, Das Lindenhotel. Berichte aus dem Potsdamer Geheimdienstgefängnis (Berlin, 2012), rev. ed. Cf. Heike<br />

Roth, “Öffentliche Anhörung zum Konzept und zur Trägerschaft der Gedenkstätte Lindenstraße am 7. Juni 2012 in<br />

Potsdam” (Potsdam, 2012).<br />

35<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

they were rather differ ent. Recent research has also paid more atten tion to their mutual learning, with the<br />

Nazi mass mur der copy ing Soviet crimes and Soviet repression imitating Nazi techniques. 33 Instead of ig-<br />

nor ing each other, both memory initiatives would benefit from confronting their mutual entanglement.<br />

<strong>The</strong> sterile moralizing about the priority of the Holocaust or of the Communist crimes might be overcome<br />

by a new effort at comparative genocide studies. <strong>The</strong> Polish Jewish survivor Raphael Lemkin coined this<br />

concept as description of the resemblance between both ideolo gi cal mass killings during <strong>World</strong> War Two.<br />

In its 1948 convention, the United Nations therefore forbade “the deliberate and systematic destruction,<br />

in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, reli gious, or national group.” By being ideologically neutral, the<br />

term genocide makes it possible to compare various cases of mass murder from the Ottoman persecution<br />

of the Armenians all the way down to Pol Pot’s crimes in Cambodia to the orgy of killing in Rwanda.<br />

Although beset with defi ni tional and empirical difficulties, statistical comparisons have established that<br />

the magni tude and form of mass murder committed by the Fascists and Communists were generally on<br />

the same scale. <strong>The</strong>refore, a similarly critical effort is needed in order to investigate the causes, courses<br />

and consequences of all cases so as to be able to prevent their recurrence. 34<br />

<strong>The</strong> debate about repression, ethnic cleansing and genocide has begun to establish the critical approach<br />

to past crimes as global standard of civilization. <strong>The</strong> internationaliza tion of the Holocaust has played a<br />

crucial role in raising awareness of the connection be tween the admis sion of crimes and democratic rule<br />

as the continuing denial of Iran indicates. It took a mixture of academic research and journalistic exposure<br />

to overcome denials of the reality of mass murder of Jews and Slavs, so that the Holocaust could become<br />

the historical basis for a shared Euro pean identity. In the case of the Communist crimes, intellectual<br />

resistance to admitting guilt has been stronger yet, but even there the reality of massive transgressions<br />

cannot be disputed any lon ger. <strong>The</strong> symbolic meeting between Russian and Polish leaders at Katyn,<br />

the site of the Red Ar my’s mass killing of the Polish officers, was an important step towards improving<br />

relations be tween both neighbors. 35 Such encouraging examples need to be extended to other mi litary or<br />

leftist dictatorships so as to break the cycle of hatred and revenge at home and abroad.<br />

In this process scholars have a crucial role to play because they can establish the actu al facts and provide<br />

conciliatory interpretations. While selling thousands of copies, most kiss-and-tell memoirs of politicians<br />

33 Colin Ross,<br />

Colin Ross, <strong>The</strong> East German Dictatorship: Problems and Perspectives in the Interpretation of the GDR (London,<br />

2002).<br />

34 Ben Kiernan,<br />

Ben Kiernan, Blood and Soil: A <strong>World</strong> History of Genocide from Sparta to Darfur (New Haven, 2007).<br />

35 Norman Naimark,<br />

Norman Naimark, Stalin’s Genocides (Princeton, 2010); and Eric Weitz, A Century of Genocide: Utopias of Race and<br />

Nation (Princeton, 2003).<br />

36


are ultimately self-serving, often covering up more than they re veal. Similarly journalistic exposes,<br />

announced with great fanfare, tend to scandalize the past through shocking disclosures rather than to<br />

provide judicious judgments. Due to their critical me thods and self-reflexive detachment, contemporary<br />

historians can help establish “what ac tually hap pe ned” in order to dispel partisan myths. Moreover, their<br />

transnatio nal discussions are also able to support internal critics and transcend the narrowness of chauvi-<br />

nistic interpretations so as to enhance mutual understanding. 36 <strong>The</strong> inter national school-book conferences<br />

supported by the Georg Eckert Institut in Braunschweig are such an endeavor that has brought scholars<br />

together from various countries so as to narrow their interpretative differen ces. 37 This effort has already<br />

helped to diminish hostile stereotypes between Germany and France as well as Poland.<br />

4) Aufarbeitung as Catharsis<br />

<strong>The</strong>se remarks have proposed the thesis that confrontation with the horrors of the past is necessary so as<br />

to reach closure through a process which Aristotle called “catharsis.” In a simp le sense this elusive term<br />

suggests a purgation of the blood from evil humors. Closer to the issue is the connotation of purification,<br />

referring to the release fear and pity in Greek tragedy. More suggestive yet is another meaning of<br />

“intellectual clarification” in the audience via its vi ca rious participation. Psychotherapists like Sigmund<br />

Freud have picked up the concept in order to suggest a way of dealing with shocking experiences through<br />

a controlled release of emotions. A recent psychological summary claims: “Catharsis refers to the re-<br />

experiencing (partially or fully) of significant traumatic events, that have not been ade quately emotionally<br />

processed and are repressed, causing emotional, physical, or relation ship problems in the person’s life.” 38<br />

In deal ing with crimes of repression or mass murder, historians can play a similar the ra peutic role of<br />

containing destructive feelings through intellectually clarifying their cause.<br />

<strong>The</strong> examples of Hitler’s Holocaust and of Stalin’s crimes suggest that the attempt to come to terms with<br />

the past involves several successive steps. As in individual therapy, survivor experiences of repres sion or<br />

genocide indicate that coping with trauma must begin with break ing the wall of silence. <strong>The</strong> incredulity of<br />

the public has to be overcome, since it creates a barrier among bystanders who do not want to be troubled<br />

by facing their complicity in the horrors. More over, the reluctance of most perpetrators to con fess to<br />

36 Konrad H. Jarausch and Martin Sabrow, eds.,<br />

Konrad H. Jarausch and Martin Sabrow, eds., Verletztes Gedächtnis: Erinnerungskultur und Zeitgeschichte im Konflikt<br />

(Frankfurt, 2002), pp. 9-73.<br />

37 Ursula A. J. Becher,<br />

Ursula A. J. Becher, 25 Jahre Georg Eckert Institut für Internationale Schulbuchforschung in Braunschweig (Hannover,<br />

2000).<br />

38 Donald Keesey, On Some Recent Interpretations of Catharsis,”<br />

Donald Keesey, On Some Recent Interpretations of Catharsis,” <strong>The</strong> Classical <strong>World</strong>, Vol. 72, No. 4 (Dec., 1978 - Jan.,<br />

1979), pp. 193-205; and Esta Powell, “Catharsis in Psychology and Beyond: A Historic Overview” http://primal;-page.<br />

com/cathar.htm<br />

37<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

crimes which they have committed has to be surmounted, since they correctly fear that their justifications<br />

will not be believed. Con fronted with such indifference, victims often have a compul sive need to share<br />

their stories in order to establish that the atrocities which trouble their dreams have actually happened,<br />

even if that seems implausible in retro spect. 39 Testifying is therefore their effort to convince the public<br />

of the reality of the crimes so as to gain a measure of sympathy for their suffering that might lead to<br />

punishment and compensation, even if the wrongs can never be fully righted.<br />

<strong>The</strong> creation of a critical memory therefore involves the sharing of eyewitness stories, the collating of<br />

different testi monies and the verification of competing claims. While an un bur den ing from horrors allows<br />

indivi duals to cope with survivor’s guilt, remembering is a social process as Maurice Halbwachs has<br />

indicated. <strong>The</strong> Spielberg interviews demonstrate how actual dimensions of suffering emerge by listening<br />

to different experien ces and com paring various accounts. As I have ar gued in Shattered Past, such<br />

exchan ges allow groups like the Displaced Persons or German expellees to shape collec tive recollections<br />

which standardize narratives of persecution as a basis for claiming re cognition and restitution. <strong>The</strong> airing<br />

of conflicting versions sponsored by different interests in a public de bate is a necessary part of the process<br />

of creating a memory culture, because it forces society to decide which rendition will be adopted by the<br />

media and in the schools. 40 Instead of being dictated from above by government fiat, this civil society<br />

discussion is essential for developing a pluralistic memory that supports democracy.<br />

In order to foster mutual understanding, such a public memory must be based on stre nu ous efforts to<br />

discredit propaganda by uncovering the truth of disputed incidents. In the Balkan Wars, NATO claimed<br />

that Milosevic was the aggressor, while Russia portrayed the Serbs as the victims of a Western plot. Only<br />

through investigative journalism and several court cases did the full tragedy of the Srebrenica massacre<br />

become public knowledge: <strong>The</strong> Dutch had an in ter est in downplaying the cowardice of their blue-<br />

helmeted peace keepers who refused to pro tect the imprisoned men and boys. <strong>The</strong> Serbian government<br />

and its offshoot in the Republika Srbs ka wanted to hide the mass killing of about 8,000 males. And the<br />

Bosnians sought to inflate what was undoubtedly the largest slaughter on the European continent after<br />

<strong>World</strong> War Two. <strong>The</strong> persecution of perpetrators like Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic was only<br />

credible when the Hague Tribunal also indicted Croatian general Ante Gotovina for similar mass mur der. 41<br />

In such cases, scholars have the responsibility of scrutinizing the truthfulness of the various claims.<br />

39 Steven Spielberg,<br />

Steven Spielberg, <strong>The</strong> Last Days: Steven Spielberg and Survivors of the Shoah Visual History Foundation (New York,<br />

1999).<br />

40 Konrad H. Jarausch and Michael Geyer,<br />

Konrad H. Jarausch and Michael Geyer, Shattered Past: Reconstructing German Histories (Princeton, 2003).<br />

41 Isabelle Delpla, avier Bougarel, Jean-Louis Fournel, eds.,<br />

Isabelle Delpla, avier Bougarel, Jean-Louis Fournel, eds., Investigating Srebrenica: Institutions, Facts, Responsibilities<br />

(New York, 2012).<br />

38


<strong>The</strong> final challenge in confronting an evil past is the fostering of forgiveness as a basis for a more<br />

constructive future. Inspired by Nelson Mandela and Desmond Tutu, the South African “Truth and<br />

Reconciliation Commission” has proven helpful in overcoming the deep-seated hatred, left behind by the<br />

white-supremacist apartheid regime. As in Latin America, its aim was not punishment but rather individual<br />

consolation and collective enlightenment about the crimes committed by the prior regime. While critics<br />

objected that the injustices cried out for legal redress, the full disclosure of the previous crimes did help<br />

create public awareness on which internal concord and external peace could be based. 42 Even other<br />

Eastern European countries have therefore started to open their Communist files. In the shadow of the<br />

Holocaust, the Ger man philosopher Karl Jaspers rightly insisted: “That which has happened is a warning.<br />

To forget it is guilt. It must be continually remembered. It was possible for this to happen, and it remains<br />

possible for it to happen again at any minute. Only in knowledge can it be prevented.” 43<br />

42 Priscilla B. Hayner, Unspeakable Truths: Facing Challenge of Truth Commissions (New York, 2001).<br />

43 Karl Jaspers, <strong>The</strong> Question of German Guilt (New York, 1948).<br />

39<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Regeneration by Complete Humanism<br />

Michel Maffesoli<br />

Paris Descartes University Sorbonne<br />

<strong>The</strong> word ‘caritas,’ a royal road of truth for Saint Augustine, has been weakened significantly in modern<br />

times. However, the word has found a new kind of vigor on the occasion of numerous charity events; it is<br />

a vigor of a social bond with love. <strong>The</strong> entire theme of ‘care’ is summarized here.<br />

Of course, ‘love’ in this context cannot be reduced to a private sense. Moreover, it doesn’t refer to the<br />

feeling shared by two persons for each other. ‘Love,’ in its full meaning, is an appropriate term to describe<br />

a general atmosphere in which a way of being together develops and blossoms. This is a basis for another<br />

form of social relation. This is not actually a new way but it has been hidden or at least marginalized<br />

throughout modern times and we need to see why. And Saint Augustine’s link between truth and “caritas”<br />

is timely, if we agree with each other, from a phenomenological perspective which acknowledges that the<br />

nature of truth is to be something which is discovered and ‘unveiled.’<br />

Truth is not given once and for all and there is also the case of ‘a priori truth.’ However, considering the<br />

Greek etymology (aletheia), it refers to something that avoids oblivion and something that is unveiled.<br />

In this context, it is about unveiling the secret permanence of emotions in the societal game. It is about<br />

acknowledging that only life (in its complete meaning) has its rights. Citing Heidegger’s joyful expression,<br />

it is also about showing ‘dialectical maturity’ in order to completely address the elements of life. It is truly<br />

what differentiates abstract and unilateral thinking (seeing only one aspect of what is ‘real’) from concrete<br />

thinking which allows us to decipher its multiple aspects. We should thus find words that know how to<br />

make things happen. <strong>The</strong> words that reveal their intimate truth while unveiling these things. It is the way<br />

(the only way actually) to find possible healing for societies in crisis!<br />

Nevertheless, in order to fully understand the role of emotions, to decipher the logic belonging to ordo<br />

40


amoris (Max Scheler), it is necessary to admit that those who play the role of saying ‘what is’ are only the<br />

speakers of an ancient memory, in other words, the tradition, in contrast to what is conventionally defined<br />

as ‘correctness’ (unilateral, univocal). This considers the fact that being “an echo is more difficult and<br />

thus rarer than having an opinion and giving value to a point of view. Being an echo means endurance<br />

in thinking.” (M. Heidegger). Being an echo of the fact that life isn’t divided and that truth of life itself<br />

cannot be divided.<br />

This means that there aren’t on one hand emotions, which take care of and heal us and on the other hand,<br />

politics, in other words, power, knowledge, and the predictable. In contrast, feelings constitute part of<br />

public and private lives. Even if this sounds surprising, nothing and no one can avoid the strong ‘love’<br />

(‘caritas,’ ‘care’) understood likewise. <strong>The</strong> role played by the emotional in administrative actions, in labor<br />

games, in professional requests and in reactions to diverse news items, all of this would encourage more<br />

lucidity in terms of ingredients used in the preparation and maintenance of social relations.<br />

In short, we cannot understand this idea if we don’t take into consideration its ‘Eros.’ <strong>The</strong> same is true for<br />

what concerns the mental atmosphere characterizing today’s era. We can even say that we are slaves to<br />

a mania and madness that we inherit. A ‘people’ is always subordinate to passions and emotions coming<br />

from afar and it is useless to believe that we have overcome these feelings. Ideological prejudices, racial<br />

reactions, diverse conventions and customs, specific language practices, cultural idioms, etc. <strong>The</strong> list is<br />

long for the ways of being and thinking that are far from being rational but rather passionate and such<br />

ways have been accumulated during a long period of human history. This is the period of CULTURAL<br />

TRADITION.<br />

Whatever was said and done during ancient times of which we have lost the memory, ‘it’ continues to<br />

work on the social body in its completeness. We had believed that we had overcome this sedimentation of<br />

collective passions and emotions and here it returns strongly and undeniably. Maybe in an analytical vision<br />

of societal power (this ‘groundwater zone’ nourishing the entire social life), should it be acknowledged<br />

that there isn’t a difference between energy and love (“what savants call energy and what mystics call<br />

universal love”)?<br />

That is why, beyond our prudent language use and below our disciplinary confinements (psychology,<br />

sociology, philosophy, theology…), it is appropriate to decipher a passionate basis from which arises any<br />

way of living together. That is because social consensus (cum sensualis) is essentially a shared feeling.<br />

This is what the ‘social contract,’ in its rationalism, had forgotten. This is what the emotional pacts, in all<br />

the areas, are rediscovering. This is what allows us to understand that societal ‘healing’ is possible.<br />

41<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

To remember, let’s remind ourselves that it is only since the Renaissance period that an individual ‘me’<br />

has been affirmed. Philosophers and historians effectively showed the paradigm shift going on with the<br />

invention of what ‘I think,’ making ‘self’ a centripetal force: everything goes back to this individual person<br />

thinking and acting by him or herself and for him or herself. <strong>The</strong> world is absorbed by the ‘me.’ This is the<br />

root of epistemological egotism, source of diverse egoisms (moral, economic, social, political, national…)<br />

that have characterized modernity.<br />

Panofsky has analyzed how this aspect ‘me’ was centrifugal in Europe in the Middle Ages; ‘me’ is<br />

thrown toward the world that surrounds it and even absorbed by it. In its strong meaning, there is<br />

altruism in current trends. Without giving moral connotation to this term, it is the other, in other words,<br />

social, geographical, ideological, religious consideration of the other, that determines what “me” is. This<br />

consideration of the other, is almost a mold, a forming form informing us of what each person is all about<br />

and the social world in its completeness.<br />

This is what ‘altruism’ is, in its epistemological meaning. Emergence of subjectivity starts from objective<br />

concepts: from a place, a tribe, and a religion. We are thus from one body: individual and social. In other<br />

words, this is importance that we give to meanings and sensitivity. ‘Realism’ was that of Saint Thomas<br />

Aquinas: “Because the meaning is also a form of reason like any cognitive power.” Sense like a ‘form<br />

of reason,’ isn’t this point focused on the connection of body and spirit? Isn’t it also focused on what I<br />

call the ‘entirety of being’ whose ‘perceptible reason’ is a good methodological leverage for a pertinent<br />

approach of this entirety?<br />

What is certain is that this ‘cognitive power’ of the perceptible is at the very heart of a postmodern<br />

paradigm thus discovering the pre-modern institutions and practices. <strong>The</strong> entirety of a medieval person, a<br />

person from a traditional society finds an echo in the ‘holism’ of diverse tribes (sexual, musical, sportive,<br />

and religious) constituting the mosaic of postmodern societies. Separation is no longer a question but<br />

what is regarded as important is connection or interaction among all the elements that the modern way of<br />

thinking has slowly dichotomized.<br />

Nature is connected to culture, the body is spiritualized, materialism becomes mystic and archaisms are<br />

technologized, work becomes prospective and creative, progressivity is combined with tradition, social<br />

ethics are beautified and so on. <strong>The</strong>se oxymorons thus translate, in fact, the important role played by libido<br />

in social structure. In the image of organic solidarity that belongs to traditional societies, the spirit of<br />

postmodern times provides diverse emotions with a place of the front view in the arrangement of all that<br />

is social.<br />

42


We can remind ourselves that there were certain ancestors with such an understanding of the world,<br />

linking reason and sense. Without an exception, modernity is certainly based on domination of nature, the<br />

individual body, and body’s environment. However, in this functionalist and production-oriented future of<br />

civilization, ‘free thinkers’ constitute an exception.<br />

We can see in what aspect the pioneers of the 17th century were all lovers of eroticism and ‘forbidden<br />

books’ at the same time. We can see how they showed (almost) public contempt for ‘morals and religion’<br />

and at the same time, fascination for ‘forbidden’ philosophy. Among all the radical authors, let’s think<br />

about Beverland(1650-1716), protagonist of the Radical Lights, specialist of the history of Greece and<br />

ancient Rome and the one who developed a philosophy of life from the liberation of libido and the<br />

glorification of passion. All of this constitutes a fundamental and universal characteristic of humanity. In<br />

this sense, he is a good analyst of a pantheist concept and a general theory of the erotic. In other words,<br />

this is a theory of an eroticism that isn’t reduced to the ‘functionality’ of reproduction but that<br />

irrigates life in its totality.<br />

<strong>The</strong> same is true for Saint Évremond despising “war, politics and religion” and trying to “distinguish<br />

himself from others similar to him through a subtle mix of philosophical spirit and love, through irreverent<br />

writing and a taste for refined pleasures.” A typical free thinker, Saint Évremond made great efforts to<br />

found and justify a close link between passionate and intellectual freedom. <strong>The</strong>refore, nothing is separate<br />

from concrete reality but on the contrary, everything is deeply rooted in it. Such thinkers conserve the old<br />

ideal of an authentic humanism knowing how to savor the always renewed beauty of what is given to see<br />

and what is given to live on. Leaving things intact, “leaving them as they are,” we are characterized by a<br />

pleasure in which the body and spirit find the part that belongs to them, all the time, again and again.<br />

What truly brings back societal emotions is the fact that behind the narrow reason exists an instinctual<br />

force: the power of life. It is about all these non-rational causes, whether they be spiritual, social, ethnic,<br />

or educational, that achieve their goals by means of psychic operations other than reasoning.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y constitute the basis of beliefs and prejudices whose importance is known in political, social and<br />

economic life. Always remember the expression used here: ‘non-rational’ causes but not irrational<br />

causes. In fact, even if these causes don’t depend on instrumental reason, in other words, they are oriented<br />

toward a precise (and faraway) goal, these causes still have an internal reason, expressing what is lived by<br />

the group which carries them. In this context, we can talk about a ‘ratio-vitalisme’ (Ortega y Gasset).<br />

As indicated, what is special for ‘ratio-vitalisme’ is that it “leaves something as it is” and doesn’t give<br />

it an external, moral order explaining what it “must be” or what we want it to be. This is exactly how<br />

43<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Heidegger characterized the power of desire: “Thanks to it, something has the fundamental power of<br />

being. Such power is fundamentally possible […].” <strong>The</strong>re is a chain of reasons between power of being,<br />

leaving as it is, and making it be which is expressed at best in the structure of postmodern communities<br />

(tribes) beyond and below philosophical definition. <strong>The</strong> essence of these communities is certainly desire,<br />

sharing a taste, process of attraction, and everything that can be summarized with the expression ‘selective<br />

affinities’ (Goethe). This may be a basis for ‘healing’ induced by a complete humanism.<br />

What bewilders rational thinking is the fact that the relation to the other lies in the action to “leave as it<br />

is” rather than the fact of taking action: toward the natural world or the social world. However, this is<br />

such rudeness that characterizes the mental atmosphere of the era, in many aspects and in multiple ways.<br />

Losing interest in politics, getting tired of diverse forms of political participation (plus, let’s not forget<br />

about the hedonistic atmosphere contaminating most social phenomena), all these things emphasize the<br />

saturation of finalized energy and underlines the regeneration of energy with a passionate connotation.<br />

In short, energy isn’t accumulated but it is consumed. However, it is to clearly mention that the libido<br />

implying this passionate energy should not be reduced to a purely genital sexuality. As all the works by<br />

Jung show, it is about psychic energy that we will rediscover in the foundation of culture in general. This<br />

is in all the aspects of this culture: art, daily life, economy, politics, etc. This is this libido in its general<br />

meaning that is the basis of symbolic nature, another way of referring to ‘living together.’ This is what I<br />

say here ‘ordo amoris.’ This is characterized by a true humanism.<br />

This psychic energy (‘objective’ psyche, more specifically) is composed of all these habits, these diverse<br />

taboo atavisms and other ‘secret areas’ which contain hidden pleasures and the desire of being together. A<br />

being is rooted in the feeling and to be in love no longer means to be closed in one’s individual self which<br />

is significantly rickety and it doesn’t mean to be closed in a ‘duo’ (that of a couple) which is entirely<br />

economic. Rather, it is comparable to a state of diffraction in perpetual movement. What is formed is thus<br />

this ‘affectio societatis,’ the mystic basis of the entire political reality, and we begin to measure its effects<br />

again.<br />

In this context, to be in love, once its sweet connotation used in ‘romance novels’ or Harlequin books is<br />

removed, constitutes a kind of synthesis that spreads everywhere with an energy secretly forming societal<br />

friendliness. This is the underlying core of sociality where excess, games, dreams and imagination don’t<br />

fail to play an important role, while favoring acceptance, which is paradoxically lucid and unconscious, of<br />

human conditions.<br />

We can apply to such a state of ‘being in love’ the meditation by Heidegger regarding the word ‘be’: “<strong>The</strong><br />

44


infinitive, what should be heard from this? This name is an abbreviation of a more complete expression:<br />

modus infinitivus, that is, the world of the unlimited, of the undetermined […].” In fact, there is “the<br />

unlimited” in emotions. Thus comes its spreading aspect that was celebrated in abundance by thinkers,<br />

poets, and, of course, those in love. It can, in essence, only be multiplied and spread. This is the emitter<br />

of a spiritual combat. This is what transforms everyone and everything. This is also what has the power<br />

to intoxicate the one whom we know is contagious. <strong>The</strong>n, what does the force of contagion of emotions<br />

mean? All that was divided desperately longs for a reunion. This is the nature of love! Distinction meant<br />

the supreme achievement of modernity. Fusion seems to be the vector of postmodernity.<br />

This is what makes shared passion an internal feeling of Res Publica (republic) and this ‘public thing’ is<br />

common to all. Such a concept cannot be understood simply through small reasoning if this isn’t enriched<br />

by all the potentialities of the perceptible. For Greek wisdom, ‘Eros’ is a mix of pleasure and wisdom.<br />

It is this mixed structure that is the beating heart of a community’s ideal. In contrast to any form of<br />

unilateralism, such a structure encourages us to hold the two ends of the chain: thought and desire. This is<br />

the thread of popular wisdom. This is also what we find in the social networks on the Internet.<br />

To make an ‘ode to perceptible reason’ or in other words, to know how to connect right reason and<br />

common sense, this is what can allow us to overcome the fundamental error of modernity: that of<br />

separation. We pay for this error at a high price. That is because if “analytical reason” (the very one that<br />

separates) enabled scientific advances that we know, if it generates technological development that softens<br />

social life, the well-being that will result from was made at the expense of “better being.” Ecological<br />

damage, the decrease of collective sense and the foolishness of the public are the most evident illustrations<br />

of this.<br />

As provocative as it may seem, it is the superiority of exacerbated consciousness and subjectivism that<br />

is reached by it. Such subjectivism is exactly what found its peak in the incommunicability of these<br />

same kinds of consciousness, with each of them confined to its small individual fortress. Surrounded by<br />

political, ideological and religious certainty, consciousness can only start a combat against another kind<br />

of consciousness equipped with identical weapons. <strong>The</strong> reason that reasoning resonates with the sound<br />

of war is that it is greedy. <strong>The</strong> rationalist systems as well as causes and effects of battles are fatal in their<br />

essence; they induce death.<br />

In its strict meaning, it is about ‘paranoia’ (a system of thinking that is well constructed, tilted and<br />

unilateral), denying all reality where we are: tradition, place, people, and culture. With all things being<br />

against “I think,” we must consider the previous and surrounding altruism.<br />

45<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

In fact, there is paranoia in ‘progressism’ which is a big modern myth (which is not acknowledged as<br />

such). Progressism forgets the ‘progressivity’ of things, in other words, to be involved in the natural and<br />

societal world and to be rooted in the sensitivity of those who are alive. Such progressivity will reappear<br />

in postmodern ecosophy.<br />

In its ‘holistic’ perspective integrating the entire condition of humans, this postmodern ecosophy will<br />

bring back all the aspects (rational, sensitive, instinctive and emotional) of human nature. In addition, it<br />

has its ‘habitus,’ in other words (Aristotle, Saint Thomas Aquinas) its adjustment to a territory shared with<br />

others, or (Spengler), its situation of being rooted and thus growing under specific biological conditions.<br />

Here is truly what we can call the revolution induced by the return of senses and of sensitivity as well as<br />

that of body and tempers to a societal “reality” that is enlarged and enriched by all of its potentialities.<br />

Sensitive ecosophy (we understood well that it gives all its importance to emotions again) will be from<br />

now on an alternative to modern ‘normapathy.’ Modern normapathy, whether it is from religious, moral or<br />

political obedience (in any case, the logic is identical: ‘must be’), tries to rid itself of any risk (ideology of<br />

‘zero risk’), to reassure excessively, to antisepticize daily existence up to the point of making it incapable<br />

of resisting any intrusion of antibody or to the diverse adversities that actually constitute worldly<br />

conditions. However, it is well known that fear of abuses, excesses, and even that of disorder is in itself<br />

what leads to the most tiring immobilism. <strong>The</strong> ‘holistic’ concept allows the possible healing of the social<br />

body!<br />

<strong>The</strong> rise of emotions simply reminds us of the dialogue existing between ‘chaos’ and ‘cosmos’ and<br />

between order and disorder. Homo sapiens only exist in relation to Homo demens. Vitalism is structurally<br />

ambivalent. That is a ‘law of land’ can exist because there are the antinomic and the anomic. It is an<br />

internal, ambiguous, plural, polytheistic law whose ambivalence is no other than the movement or<br />

dynamics of nature as a whole. Inside their diverse impulses, body and spirit are united in a mixture<br />

without end. After all, the ‘devil of the flesh’ is a good illustration of this deeply rooted spirit. Isn’t this<br />

what popular wisdom used to call ‘affectus carnalis,’ or carnal emotions, a firm human impulse to adjust<br />

to and enjoy this world?<br />

This is thus what starts in the societal structure where ‘love’ plays an important role. It is the end of long<br />

domination of the heart by the cognitive. Let’s also not forget that this was an intuition of A. Comte. This<br />

was regarded as the object of ecstatic phantasmagorias, in a somewhat contemptuous manner. In the<br />

same vein, the ‘Religion of Humanity’ expressed in itself the firmly anchored conviction that “spirit isn’t<br />

destined to reign but to serve… In fact, the real command requires a force above all and reason was only<br />

the light; its impetus should come from elsewhere.”<br />

46


Thanks to its theoretical quirks, this enlightening remark emphasizes the role of impetus as another way<br />

of saying human dynamics. We could provide it with several names: dynamics (dunamis: force), energy,<br />

emotion, libido, etc. Anyway, it is an initial impulse which is at the origin of vital leap either individually<br />

or collectively and it ensures its principal command. It is by forgetting this fundamental element that we<br />

reach abstractization of social life correlated to uprooting of the human plant!<br />

In fact, if we want to understand a number of current phenomena (e.g. hysteria, sports gatherings, political<br />

effervescence, religious fanaticism, and other ways of expressing emotions), we may have to remember<br />

the sharp formula of Auguste Comte: “...spirit is always the minister of the heart.” In addition, before we<br />

reduce their works to dried schematism, Durkheim and his followers had a much more open concept of<br />

the role of emotions in collective consciousness. This is how they didn’t hesitate to regard sociology as<br />

“science of suggested desires.” It is a curious and beautiful anticipating formula in that it underlines not<br />

only the role of collective consciousness but also that of unconsciousness common to all in which anyone<br />

‘participates’ and that he or she shares with others, in an almost magical way.<br />

<strong>The</strong> attempt of interpretation, deciphering and decoding the signs belonging to a culture, can only pay<br />

attention to the expression of feelings. <strong>The</strong>se feelings are “symbolic” and in the strong meaning of the<br />

term, they mean a process of acknowledging the other, in other words, a process of “being born” to oneself<br />

from altruism. It is thus a more intense “light” that is given by the connection of reason and sense. A<br />

swift light isn’t reduced to brightness offered by small reason, or by rationalism that is its epistemological<br />

expression. <strong>The</strong> light producing this illumination whose diverse institutions (religious, moral, and social<br />

ones) are always objects to be wary of. It is still such illumination that we need to learn to consider if we<br />

want to understand the social “mysticism” beyond scholars’ opinions (This combined opinion is quite<br />

moralizing). <strong>The</strong> contemporary tribes of such mysticism provide us with numerous examples. Also, as it<br />

is true, if we don’t take this term in a bad sense, that a number of “those who are enlightened” are growing<br />

in all areas of public life.<br />

Deep ecology, religious revival, charismatic movements, political extremism, “gay” fanaticism, esoteric<br />

recurrence, media’s mimicry, obsession with sports, and theoretical militancy confuse science and labor<br />

engagement. Under these circumstances, we can find, for the best and for the worst, a large number of<br />

examples of this “illumination” characterizing the Spirit of time! Moreover, we can at least say that these<br />

“illuminated persons” receive views and reactions through a logical conformity of which they are not<br />

conscious. In this regard, it is enough to “surf” several “lists of diffusion” such as a university association<br />

or such a sexual tribe in order to measure the scope of mimicry.<br />

<strong>The</strong> “laws of imitation,” which were applied in the case that we have just quoted, lie in the power of<br />

47<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

contagion of emotions. It is a priori and without any reflexive basis that we react and think in such ways,<br />

that we will announce bitter critiques and apply inquisitorial processes. However, this is also thanks<br />

to such a feeling of belonging that we will participate in such things as charitable activities, vibrate in<br />

response to such collective emotions and engage in concrete forms of solidarity or daily generosity.<br />

<strong>The</strong> feeling of belonging and relation of belonging! Such intrusion of emotions transforms mechanical<br />

solidarity into a real, organic solidarity and it is characterized by its initiatory structure. We don’t judge;<br />

we follow our masters. We don’t exert our critical spirit; we try to deepen the order of things. We never<br />

define the “ideological tools of the State” in a critical way, using the jargon from the 1960’s. On the other<br />

hand, we create analogies and we use metaphors. In other words, in a poetic way, we trace “the real”<br />

that is complex, unstable and located inside existential dynamism. In an impulsive way, we are probably<br />

“enraged” collectively. Most often, we try to adjust to the world as it is and we do so in order to win the<br />

best part for ourselves and for the tribe we join. <strong>The</strong> harmony with the world and with others is truly the<br />

common denominator for all the past experiences.<br />

All of this brings back the underlying part of social being and unconscious excitement that it always<br />

generates. Thus comes the need to elaborate on a thought of the organic in accordance with vitalism<br />

which is generated from all the pores of the social body, in opposition to the dominating knowledge (that<br />

of functionalist “mechanics”). This is what is at the heart of “social healing.” Such a thought is no longer<br />

blessed tap water (holy water) but it is a thought that knows how to use aristocratic freedom offshore.<br />

As Proust said, “We become moral when we are unhappy!” However, what we can empirically observe<br />

is a revival of generalized hedonism. It always irritates the sad people preferring to criticize catastrophist<br />

analyses. Nevertheless, such hedonism is there (popular expression appetitus), such vital appetence for<br />

which certain good people show maintenance and renewed vigor. Cult of body and pleasure to consume,<br />

to enjoy the goodness of this world and to be attached to the present are often described as signs of deep<br />

“alienation” or exploitation of body and spirit. Can’t we rather acknowledge here the fact that we enjoy<br />

life?<br />

We enjoy a life that is strengthened, increased and doubled, expressing everyday popular wisdom that<br />

has always been friendly to love. Such love is like energy coming from the very nature of humanity, from<br />

those who are alive. It is a love that is not castrated by constant Judaeo- Christian (Semitic) moralism. It is<br />

a love that is an afterglow of the old pagan foundations and we could be quite right to call it Eros.<br />

In fact, there are permanent comings and goings in social dynamism (what Bergson calls “vital<br />

momentum”) between Love and Eros, between ordo amoris and social eroticism. Sense of belonging<br />

48


expresses this impulse which is found only in humans whose very nature is to aspire fusion, to bring<br />

together what is scattered. Wouldn’t it be the nostalgia of what Durkheim used to call “social divinity”? It<br />

means to be together like God. It is transcendence that is generated!<br />

It is the final destination of the analysis of a social structure where emotions occupy the principal place.<br />

This means that beyond a rationalism with devastating effects (destroying the planet and the consensus),<br />

we know how to integrate intuition into mystic experience. Intuition (intueri or to see the inside), which<br />

is the condition of possibility of any scientific discovery, is thus the methodological leverage allowing<br />

us to understand the close union uniting reason and sense. “Ratio-vitalism” reaches its peak in festive<br />

effervescence throughout time, our time in particular.<br />

An undeniable appetite for this world, this is what can lead to “healing!” Its roots are found in<br />

epicureanism and stoicism which, each in its own way, attest to the worldly radicality of enjoyment<br />

finding its own interactivity existing between reason and senses.<br />

Such senses are from the Middle Ages in “amor discretus” where “discretion” is synonymous with right<br />

judgment, in other words, the right judgment of oneself and the other and thus, sense of belonging that we<br />

can form between one and the other. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is about a love controlled by the right judgment. This is<br />

the basis for the formation of social relations, that among tribes, that of “states” and nations in a complex<br />

and organic structure where understanding and sensibility occupy their own place.<br />

We recall that how and in what aspect “caritas,” “care”, love and desire are intimately intertwined and are<br />

at the very foundation of Aristotle’s “hexis” and Thomas Aquinas’ “habitus.” <strong>The</strong>se notions bring back our<br />

permanent measures pushing us to act in one way or another. We thus see well how libidinal energy is at<br />

the very origin of multiple impetuses that move individuals and thus, favor their diverse reunions. It is by<br />

keeping this in mind that we could have an understanding (not concretely anymore) of postmodern tribes’<br />

action for which emotional attraction and impulse never fail to play the most important role.<br />

It is exactly what Spinoza called “loving intelligence” in his pantheistic naturalism. Such “loving<br />

intelligence” means to “link together” (intellegere) all of the scattered elements of the complex “real,”<br />

starting from emotions. In fact, intelligence finds its essence only when it gathers together what is<br />

scattered. Intelligence is thus specific; it is about growing (cum crescere) with the very thing that it<br />

describes. In short, intelligence is rooted in everyday life and it thus contributes to common passions.<br />

Such rooting isn’t an easy matter as long as our mind tends to become separate from this humus which,<br />

however, constitutes a human. This can be radically defined like this: a return to the roots of a complex<br />

49<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

and ambivalent human, a return which allows us to update the contemporary understanding of the “soul<br />

of the world” of the neo-Platonists. It could be called an unconscious soul, an emotional soul, a soul of<br />

nature, the way it is described doesn’t matter. It is enough to note that such an intuitive view allows us to<br />

underline the importance of the release of oneself into the other. <strong>The</strong> term empathy, frequently used these<br />

days, merely expresses such interaction between one and the other. In other words, it means to put oneself<br />

in the place of the other. This could be because we share the same feelings or, this could also be done to<br />

perceive the consequences of such reversibility.<br />

What is enabled by empathy is the situation in which Eros, combining all the impulses of life, pushes me<br />

to be detached from myself. In the Banquet, Plato shows that Love acknowledges its state of destitution;<br />

the other is needed. In short, perfection isn’t in Me but in Us.<br />

It is this mystical experience (We have seen some of its roots) that we will rediscover in the postmodern<br />

New Age: “to free oneself,” to be liberated from self, paradoxically encouraging oneself to be linked to<br />

the other. Some have been able to emphasize the relationship between heart (cor-cordis) and rope (chorda,<br />

gut). Related to the Old French “corder,” (to tie up), the modern French word “s’accorder” (to agree with<br />

each other) means to come from the heart that we share. Thus love means tying each other together. It<br />

is the Gordian knot constituting postmodern tribes, that of interrelation. In contrast to epistemological<br />

individualism, it is the prevalence of ordo amoris where dependence on the other (the Other) is essential.<br />

To express in another way, we can recall the position (if it is reasonable) of the philosopher Alain,<br />

emphasizing that in contrast to “contractualism,” society is based on friendship or diverse feelings. We can<br />

also see that in this context, society is an “extension of family.” Such metaphysical familialism is exactly<br />

the cause and effect of this movement of magnetization largely dominating social relations whose basis is<br />

impulsive, emotional, and affectionate, all things whose erotic element cannot be more evident.<br />

Thus facing tedious and somewhat brief social theories diagnosing general prostration on the rise: gloom,<br />

decadence, ennui, decline and other catastrophist characteristics, it is right to remember that we are<br />

observing multiple existential experiences rooted in the (re)birth of passion, desire and diverse emotions of<br />

the same water, revitalizing what is always and over again old and very young: the eternal togetherness.<br />

Here, it is the logic of “philia” that constitutes the backbone of society, sometimes secretly and sometimes<br />

in a paroxysmal way; what is beyond and below the tragic feeling of existence makes such logic<br />

acceptable, anyway more desirable than its entire disappearance. It is exactly the question asked by<br />

Cicero: “qui potest esse vita vitalis, quae non in amici mutua benevolentia conquiescat” (how can we have<br />

a livable life, if it wasn’t able to find ease in the mutual benevolence of friendship.”)<br />

50


Such “mutualism” of benevolence is exactly what constitutes the economy of all human changes, its<br />

structural “relationism.” Specific wisdom: ecosophy based on the permanent interaction of reason and<br />

sense. Put into a perspective that we continue to see in terms such as mutuality, cooperation, solidarity, all<br />

things refer to a lasting relation and even symbiosis between entities that are different and supplementary<br />

at the same time. Here, what is in question is “natural health” of all sociality. Deep sociality, while being<br />

hidden (we could say “secret” or “discreet”) still constitutes the culture of all “being together” over a long<br />

period of time. In this simple meaning, it is the humus soil, the good soil where togetherness can grow<br />

and develop. It is, in a way, dynamic rooting. It is also a “natural” characteristic which is closer to what<br />

Heidegger said about physis: emergence, blooming, movement of birth.<br />

Thus, “the nature of things that like to hide themselves.” Note the Heraclitean remark emphasizing<br />

the constant dialogue existing between the depth and appearance of what is. It is about withdrawal,<br />

concealment and shadow necessary for the whole of one’s life. It is what Heidegger specifies in the<br />

critique of “meta” physics denying the simple physics. In other words, such physics denies this world in<br />

accordance with a hypothetical heavenly world which is to come later on. Thus physis refers to “the act<br />

of rising up and flourishing, all to be revealed within oneself.” <strong>The</strong> rhythm of life can only be expressed<br />

from this fixed point, a basic source allowing and justifying the flow of what is. It is exactly what we can<br />

observe in a number of contemporary practices, in particular youthful ones: to stay inside oneself while<br />

blooming on the outside. An oxymoron such as “mystical celebration of body” effectively regenerates the<br />

role and function of display (body), starting from inwardness (spirit, soul).<br />

Such dynamics are expressed in a specific kind of living together: that of “mysticism” where each one, in<br />

his or her entirety, is only an element of a big group that surpasses each one and gives a meaning to each<br />

one. It is the “mystical body” of Catholic theology, the “subtle body” of oriental traditions, the collective<br />

spirit of Freemason-type symbolic logic; all things beyond the anatomical body and serving as a basis for<br />

a relation of belonging (ecosophy) between Me, altruism of the world and the others. In some sense, it is<br />

expanded and generalized eroticism.<br />

As for the expression “sensitive ecosophy,” it is about becoming attentive to this irrefutable vitalism<br />

which is expressed in so many ways. It is vitality that, beyond utilitarianism, emphasizes the unconscious<br />

importance of a culture of instinct no longer accepting to be reduced to a rationalistic civilization. Let’s<br />

meditate again on Heidegger: “Action is everywhere and display of a world is nowhere.” (ein Welten<br />

der Welt). However, what is happening is that such “display,” such search of a “beautiful life” and of a<br />

“better-being” (more than just “well-being”) appears in a spontaneous sociality surpassing the limits of a<br />

reasoning sociality.<br />

51<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Such spontaneity of life and of the vitalist “system,” which is developed little by little, is expressed in the<br />

concern to transform existence into a daily work of art. We can also measure its effects in the increased<br />

role given to imagination in all the areas of social life. It is not to forget exacerbation of feelings promoting<br />

all of these kinds of enthusiasm: political, social, charitable, religious, musical, sports, etc. where passions<br />

or more simply moods take the place of reasoning and even that of intellectual capability to understand<br />

the social “real.”<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is lyricism in the current trend and it is romantic sensibility which is heated up by collective<br />

excitement and it offers a global and holistic vision of these human things that we had tended to strangely<br />

separate. Maybe it is to see there what M. M. Bakounine called “regeneration through love.” Meanwhile,<br />

Fourier celebrated “erotosophy” expressing the powerful return of imagination and phantasmagoria in the<br />

development and strengthening of the social relation. It is the return of common passions.<br />

By understanding this term in its original meaning, this is what Comte called the “sympathetic culture”<br />

belonging to entire humanity and ensuring its “moral regeneration.” This is an acknowledgement of the<br />

“predominance of feelings” able to maintain dissolution of what is social dominated by simple reason.<br />

Ecosophy restores feelings to the most important position in the structure of social life. Thinking about<br />

the memory of long, long ago of humanity, certain thinkers had shown the probable return to this ordo<br />

amoris, as early as the 19th century. It is this and this alone that can allow the beginning of regeneration<br />

of social life.<br />

52


La régénéréscence par l’humanisme intégral<br />

Michel Maffesoli<br />

UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES SORBONNE<br />

Le mot « caritas » voie royale pour Saint Augustin de la vérité, s’est bien affaibli tout au longs des temps<br />

modernes. Sinon qu’il trouve dans les nombreuses manifestations caritatives une vigueur renouvelée.<br />

Celle d’un lien social où l’amour a sa place. Toute la thématique du « CARE » est là résumé !<br />

Il ne s’agit pas, bien entendu, d’un amour que l’on peut réduire à la sphère privée. Non plus d’un amour<br />

désignant le sentiment éprouvé par deux personnes l’une pour l’autre. L’amour en question, en son sens<br />

plénier, est un terme commode pour désigner une ambiance générale dans laquelle s’élabore et s’épanouit<br />

une manière d’être-ensemble. Le fondement d’une autre forme du lien social. Manière pas forcément<br />

nouvelle, mais qui fut occultée, ou à tout le moins marginalisée, il faudra voir pourquoi, tout au long de la<br />

modernité. Et la liaison augustinienne entre vérité et « caritas » est opportune, si on s’accorde, dans l’optique<br />

phénoménologique à reconnaître que le propre de la vérité est d’être ce qui se découvre et se « dévoile ».<br />

Vérité non pas donnée une fois pour toute, pas plus que vérité a priori, mais bien, au plus près de son<br />

étymologie gecque (« aletheia ») : ce qui échappe à l’oubli, ce qui est dévoilé.<br />

En la matière dévoilement de la secrète permanence de l’affect dans le jeu sociétal. La reconnaissance<br />

que la vie, en son sens plénier, seule a ses droits. Et que dès lors il convient, pour reprendre une heureuse<br />

expression de Heidegger, de faire preuve d’une « maturité dialectique » afin d’aborder ces choses de la vie<br />

en leur entièreté. C’est bien cela qui différencie la pensée abstraite, unilatérale, ne voyant qu’un seul côté<br />

du « Réel », de la pensée concrète sachant en repérer l’aspect pluriel. Il faut donc trouver ces mots sachant<br />

faire advenir les choses. Mots qui en dévoilant ces dernières révèlent leur intime vérité. C’est là , et là<br />

seulement, que repose la possible « guérison » (Healing) pour des sociétés en crise!<br />

Mais, pour apprécier le rôle de l’affect, pour repérer la logique propre à l’ordo amoris (Max Scheler)<br />

53<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

il est nécessaire, à l’encontre de ce qu’il est convenu de nommer le « correctness » (unilatérale,<br />

univoque), d’admettre que ceux qui ont pour fonction de dire ce qui est ne soient que les hauts parleurs<br />

d’une antique mémoire , c’est à dire de la TRADITION. Étant entendu qu’être « un écho est plus<br />

difficile et de ce fait plus rare qu’avoir un avis et faire valoir un point de vue. Être un écho, telle est<br />

l’endurance de la pensée » (M.Heidegger). Être un écho du fait que la vie ne se divise pas; et que la<br />

vérité de la vie, elle-même est indivisible.<br />

Ce qui veut dire qu’il n’y a pas, d’un côté l’affect, qui soigne et guérit, et de l’autre le politique c’est-<br />

à-dire le pouvoir, le savoir, le prévoir. Mais qu’au contraire les sentiments sont partie prenante de<br />

la vie publique et privée. Même si cela peut paraître étonnant, rien ni personne n’est indemne de la<br />

pétulance d’un « amour » (« caritas », « care ») ainsi compris. Le rôle que joue l’émotionnel dans l’action<br />

administrative, dans le jeu syndical, dans les revendications professionnelles, dans les réactions aux<br />

faits divers, tout cela devrait inciter à plus de lucidité quant aux ingrédients entrant dans l’élaboration et<br />

dans la perdurance du lien social.<br />

En bref, on ne peut pas comprendre le passé si l’on ne tient pas compte de son « Éros ». Il en est de<br />

même pour ce qui concerne l’atmosphère mentale caractérisant l’époque présente. On peut même<br />

dire que l’on est tributaire des manies et des folies dont on hérite. Un peuple est toujours soumis aux<br />

passions et émotions venant de fort loin, et qu’il est vain de croire dépassées. Préjugés idéologiques,<br />

réactions raciales, us et coutumes divers, pratiques langagières spécifiques, idiotismes culturels,<br />

longue est la liste des manières d’être et de pensée qui sont rien moins que rationnelles, mais devant<br />

tout à un passionnel, sédimenté sur la longue durée des histoires humaines. Celle de la TRADITION<br />

CULTURELLE.<br />

Ce qui a été dit et fait dans les temps anciens et dont on a perdu la mémoire, « ça » continue à travailler<br />

le corps social en son entier. On avait cru dépasser cette sédimentation des passions et émotions<br />

collectives, et voilà qu’elle refait un indéniable retour en force. Peut-être dans une vision analytique de<br />

la puissance sociétale (cette « nappe phréatique » sustentant toute vie sociale) faudrait-il reconnaître<br />

qu’il n’y a pas de différence entre énergie et amour : « ce que les savants appellent énergie et les<br />

mystiques amour universel ».<br />

Voilà pourquoi, au-delà de nos prudences langagières et en-deçà de nos enfermements disciplinaires<br />

(psychologie, sociologie, philosophie, théologie...), il convient de repérer le substrat passionnel à partir<br />

duquel s’élève tout vivre-ensemble. Le consensus (« cum sensualis ») social étant, essentiellement,<br />

un sentiment partagé. Ce que le « Contrat social », en son rationalisme, avait oublié. Ce que les pactes<br />

émotionnels, en tous les domaines, sont en train de redécouvrir. Ce qui permet de comprendre qu’une «<br />

54


guérison » sociétale est possible.<br />

Rappelons, pour mémoire, que c’est à partir de la Renaissance que se constitue l’affirmation d’un « moi<br />

» individuel. Les philosophes, les historiens ont bien montré le changement de paradigme s’opérant<br />

avec l’invention de ce « je pense », faisant de « soi » une force centripète : tout est ramené à cet<br />

individu pensant et agissant par lui-même et pour lui-même. Le monde est absorbé par le « moi ». Ce<br />

qui est la racine de l’égotisme épistémologique, source des divers égoïsmes (moraux, économiques,<br />

sociaux, politiques, nationaux...) ayant caractérisé la modernité.<br />

Panofsky a bien analysé en quoi au Moyen Âge européen ce « moi » est centrifuge, c’est-à-dire qu’il<br />

est projeté vers le monde qui l’entoure, voire absorbé par lui. En son sens fort, il y a de l’altruisme<br />

dans l’air du temps. Sans donner une connotation morale à ce terme, c’est l’autre, c’est-à-dire l’altérité<br />

sociale, géographique, idéologique, religieuse qui détermine ce qu’est le moi. Cette altérité est,<br />

quasiment, un moule, une forme formante informant ce qu’est tout un chacun et le monde social en son<br />

entier.<br />

C’est cela « l’altruisme » en son sens épistémologique. L’émergence de la subjectivité se fait à partir<br />

des intimations objectives : être d’un lieu, d’une tribu, d’une religion. Ainsi l’on est d’un corps :<br />

individuel et social. C’est-à-dire l’importance que l’on peut accorder aux sens et au sensible. Ce «<br />

réalisme » fut celui de saint Thomas d’Aquin : « car le sens, aussi, est une forme de raison comme tout<br />

pouvoir cognitif ». Les sens comme « forme de raison », n’est-ce point rendre attentif à la conjonction<br />

du corps et de l’esprit ? À ce que j’appelle l’entièreté de l’être, dont la « raison sensible » est un bon<br />

levier méthodologique pour une approche pertinente de cette entièreté?<br />

Ce qui est certain, c’est que ce « pouvoir cognitif » du sensible est au cœur même d’un paradigme<br />

postmoderne retrouvant, ainsi, les intuitions et les pratiques prémodernes. L’entièreté de l’homme<br />

médiéval, celui des sociétés traditionnelles, trouve écho dans le « holisme » des diverses tribus<br />

(sexuelles, musicales, sportives, religieuses) constituant la mosaïque des sociétés postmodernes. La<br />

séparation n’est plus de mise, mais bien la conjonction, l’interaction entre tous les éléments que la<br />

pensée moderne avait, à loisir, dichotomisés.<br />

La nature s’allie à la culture, le corps se spiritualise, le matérialisme devient mystique, les archaïsmes<br />

se technologisent, le travail devient prospectif en étant créatif, la progressivité intègre du traditionnel,<br />

l’éthique sociale s’esthétise et tout à l’avenant. Ces oxymores traduisant, de fait, l’importance que<br />

joue la libido dans la structuration sociale. À l’image de la solidarité organique propre aux sociétés<br />

traditionnelles, l’esprit du temps postmoderne redonne aux divers affects une place de premier plan<br />

55<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

dans l’ordonnancement du tout social.<br />

On peut rappeler qu’il y eut quelques ancêtres à une telle conception du monde alliant la raison et les<br />

sens. Certes, la modernité se fonde sur la domination, sans distinction, de la nature, celle du corps<br />

individuel et celle du corps environnant. Mais dans ce devenir fonctionnaliste et productiviste de la<br />

civilisation les « libertins » font exception.<br />

On peut montrer en quoi les défricheurs du VIIe siècle étaient tout à la fois amateurs d’érotisme et<br />

de « livres interdits ». Comment ils affichaient un mépris (presque) ouvert « pour la morale et pour la<br />

religion » et ce conjointement avec une fascination pour la philosophie « interdite ». Parmi tous les<br />

auteurs radicaux pensons à Beverland (1650-1716), protagoniste des « Lumières radicales », spécialiste<br />

de l’histoire de la Grèce et de la Rome antiques, et qui développe une philosophie de la vie à partir de<br />

la libération de la libido et de la glorification des passions. Tout cela constituant une caractéristique<br />

fondamentale et universelle de l’humanité. Il est, en ce sens, un bon analyste d’une conception<br />

panthéiste et d’une théorie générale de l’érotique. C’est-à-dire d’un érotisme ne se réduisant pas à la<br />

« fonctionnalité » de la reproduction, mais irriguant la vie en sa totalité.<br />

Il en est de même de Saint Évremond méprisant « la guerre, la politique et la religion » et cherchant<br />

« à se distinguer de ses semblables par un mélange subtil d’esprit philosophique et d’humour, par<br />

une plume irrévérencieuse et un goût pour les plaisirs raffinés ». Type même du libre-penseur, Saint<br />

Évremond s’est employé à fonder et à justifier une liaison étroite entre la liberté des passions et la<br />

liberté intellectuelle. Donc rien qui ne s’abstrait par rapport à la réalité concréte, mais au contraire,<br />

s’y enracine on ne peut plus. De tels penseurs conservent le vieil idéal d’un humanisme authentique<br />

sachant apprécier la beauté, toujours renouvelée, de ce qui se donne à voir et de ce qui se donne à vivre.<br />

En laissant les choses en repos, en les « laissant être » on participe, ainsi, d’un plaisir dans lequel corps<br />

et esprit trouvent, toujours et à nouveau, la part qui leur revient.<br />

Ce que fait bien ressortir l’émotionnel sociétal c’est que derrière la raison étroite existe une force<br />

instinctuelle : la puissance de la vie. Il s’agit de toutes ces causes non rationnelles, qu’elles soient<br />

spirituelles, sociales, ethniques, éducationnelles, qui arrivent à leurs fins par des opérations psychiques<br />

autres que le raisonnement.<br />

Ce sont là les fondements des croyances, des préjugés dont on sait l’importance dans la vie politique,<br />

sociale ou économique. Gardons en mémoire l’expression employée: causes «non-rationnelles»<br />

et non irrationnelles. En effet, quoique ne dépendant pas d’une raison instrumentale, c’est- à-dire<br />

orientée vers un but précis (et lointain), ces causes n’en ont pas moins une raison interne, exprimant ce<br />

56


qui est vécu par le groupe qui en est le porteur. On peut parler, à ce propos, d’un « ratio-vitalisme »<br />

(Ortega y Gasset).<br />

La spécificité de ce dernier c’est, ainsi qu’on l’a indiqué, qu’il « laisse-être » ce qui est et n’impose pas,<br />

de l’extérieure une injonction morale précisant ce qui « doit-être », ou ce que l’on aimerait qui soit.<br />

C’est bien ainsi que Heidegger caractérisait le pouvoir du désir : « cela grâce à quoi quelque chose a<br />

proprement pouvoir d’être. Ce pouvoir est proprement le possible... » Il y a une chaîne de raisons entre<br />

le pouvoir-être, le laisser-être, le faire-être qui, au-delà ou en-deçà de la définition philosophique,<br />

s’exprime au mieux dans la constitution des communautés (tribus) postmodernes dont l’essence est<br />

bien le désir, le partage d’un goût, le processus d’attraction, toutes choses pouvant se résumer dans<br />

l’expression « d’affinités électives » (Goethe). Là est, peut-être le fondement de la guérison (« healing<br />

») induit par un humanisme intégral.<br />

Ce qui déconcerte l’entendement rationaliste, c’est que la relation à l’autre repose sur le « laisser-<br />

être » plutôt que sur le fait d’agir : sur le monde naturel ou le monde social. Or c’est bien une telle<br />

désinvolture qui est, à bien des égards et de multiples manières, ce qui caractérise l’atmosphère<br />

mentale de l’époque. La désaffection vis-à-vis du politique, la lassitude concernant les diverses formes<br />

d’engagement, sans oublier le climat hédoniste contaminant la plupart des phénomènes sociaux, toutes<br />

choses accentuant la saturation d’une énergie finalisée et soulignant la reviviscence d’une énergie à<br />

connotation passionnelle.<br />

En bref, l’énergie ne s’accumule pas, elle se dépense. Précisons, cependant, que la libido sous-<br />

entendant cette énergie présentéiste ne saurait se réduire à une sexualité purement génitale. Ainsi que le<br />

montre bien toute l’œuvre de Jung, il s’agit d’une énergie psychique que l’on va retrouver au fondement<br />

de la culture en général. Et ce dans tous les aspects de cette culture : art, vie quotidienne, économie,<br />

politique, etc. C’est cette libido en son sens général qui est le substrat de l’ordre symbolique, autre<br />

manière de dire le vivre-ensemble. Ce que je nomme ici « ordo amoris ». Ordre d’un vrai humanisme .<br />

Cette énergie psychique (psyché « objective », précisons- le) est constituée par toutes ces habitudes, ces<br />

tabous divers atavismes et autre « plis » dans lesquels se nichaient le plaisir et le désir d’être-ensemble.<br />

Un être enraciné dans le sentiment, faisant de l’état amoureux non plus un repliement sur un soi<br />

individuel bien rachitique, pas plus sur un « duo » (celui du couple) tout à fait économique, mais bien<br />

comme un état de diffraction en perpétuel devenir. Et constituant, de ce fait, cette « affectio societatis<br />

», fondement mystique de toute réalité politique, dont on recommence à mesurer les effets.<br />

En ce sens « être amoureux », une fois évacuée toute connotation doucereuse à usage de la «<br />

57<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

bibliothèque rose » ou des romans de la collection Arlequin, constitue une sorte de synthèse<br />

disséminatrice, éparpillant ici et là une énergie consti- tuant, secrètement, le liant sociétal. Ce qui est la<br />

centralité souterraine d’une socialité où l’excès, le ludique, l’onirique, l’imaginaire ne manquent pas<br />

de jouer un rôle d’importance, ce serait-ce qu’en favorisant l’acceptation, paradoxalement lucide et<br />

inconsciente, de la condition humaine.<br />

On peut appliquer à un tel « être-amoureux » la méditation que Heidegger fait à propos du mot « être<br />

» : « l’infinitif, que faut-il entendre par là ? Cette appellation est l’abréviation de l’expression plus<br />

complète : modus infinitivus, c’est-à-dire le monde de l’illimité, de l’indéterminé...».<br />

Il y a, en effet, de l’illimité dans l’affect. D’où son aspect irradiant qui fut, en abondance, célébré par les<br />

penseurs, les poètes, sans oublier les amoureux. Il ne peut, par essence, qu’être multiplié, démultiplié.<br />

Il est le projectile d’un combat de l’esprit. C’est en cela qu’il métamorphose tout un chacun et toutes<br />

choses. C’est aussi en cela qu’il a un pouvoir enivrant qui, on le sait, est contagieux. Que signifie donc<br />

la force de contagion de l’affect? Tout ce qui a été divisé aspire, profondément, à la réunion. C’est<br />

l’ordre de l’amour! La distinction fut l’aboutissement suprême de la modernité. La fusion semble être<br />

les vecteurs de la postmodernité.<br />

C’est bien cela qui fait de la passion partagée le sentiment intérieur de la Res Publica (République), de<br />

cette « chose publique » commune à tous, ne pouvant pas être saisie simplement par la petite raison si<br />

celle-ci n’est pas enrichie de toutes les potentialités du sensible. Pour la sagesse grecque, « Éros » est<br />

un mixte de plaisir et de sagesse. C’est cette « duité » qui est le cœur battant de l’idéal communautaire.<br />

À l’opposé de toute unilatéralité, elle incite à tenir les deux bouts de la chaîne : la pensée et le désir.<br />

C’est bien une telle concaténation qui est le fil rouge de la sagesse populaire. C’est cela même que l’on<br />

retrouve dans les réseaux sociaux propres à Internet.<br />

Faire un « éloge de la raison sensible » ou, ce qui revient au même, savoir ajointer la droite raison<br />

et le sens commun, voilà ce qui peut permettre de dépasser l’erreur-mère de la modernité : celle de<br />

la séparation. Erreur que l’on paye, de nos jours, au prix fort. Car si la « raison analytique » (celle<br />

justement qui sépare) permit les avancées scientifiques que l’on sait, si cela engendra le développement<br />

technologique qui adoucit la vie sociale, le bien-être qui en résulta se fit au détriment d’un mieux-<br />

être. Les saccages écologiques, l’abaissement du sens collectif, l’abêtissement des esprits en sont les<br />

illustrations les plus évidentes.<br />

Aussi provocateur que cela puisse paraître, c’est le primat d’une conscience exacerbée, et le<br />

subjectivisme auquel cela aboutit qui, justement, trouva son acmé dans l’incommunicabilité de ces<br />

58


mêmes consciences chacune enfermée en son étroite forteresse individuelle. Caparaçonnée dans ses<br />

certitudes, politiques, idéologiques, religieuses, la conscience ne pouvait qu’engager le combat contre<br />

une autre conscience munie d’armes identiques. La raison raisonnante résonne du bruit des guerres dont<br />

elle est avide. Les systèmes rationalistes, causes et effets de ces batailles, sont par essence mortifères :<br />

ils portent à la mort.<br />

En son sens strict il s’agit d’une « paranoïa » (système de pensée bien construit, surplombant, uni-<br />

latéral), déniant toute réalité à ce dans quoi l’on est immergé : tradition, lieu, ethnie, culture. Toutes<br />

choses faisant qu’à l’encontre du « je pense », l’on est pensé par l’altérité antécédente et environnante.<br />

Il y a, en effet, de la paranoïa dans le « progressisme » qui est la grande mythologie (ne se<br />

reconnaissant pas comme telle) moderne. Progressisme oubliant la « progressivité » des choses, c’est-<br />

à-dire l’implication dans le monde naturel et sociétal et l’enracinement dans le sensible du vivant.<br />

Progressivité qui va ressurgir dans l’écosophie postmoderne.<br />

Cette dernière, dans une perspective « holistique », c’est- à-dire intégrant l’entièreté du donné humain,<br />

va mette en jeu, dans une logique de réversibilité, tous les aspects : rationnel, sensible, instinctuel,<br />

émotionnel, de l’humaine nature. Son « habitus », également, c’est-à-dire (Aristote, saint Thomas<br />

d’Aquin) son ajustement à un territoire partagé avec d’autres, ou encore (Spengler) son enracinement et<br />

donc sa croissance dans un biotope précis. Voilà bien ce que l’on peut nommer la révolution induite par<br />

le retour des sens et du sensible, du corps et des humeurs, dans un « Réel » sociétal élargi et enrichi de<br />

toutes ses potentialités.<br />

L’écosophie sensible, ce qui on l’a bien compris redonne toute son importance à l’affect, sera dès lors<br />

une alternative à ce que fut la « normopathie » moderne. Celle-ci, qu’elle soit d’obédience religieuse,<br />

morale ou politique (leur logique est identique : « devoir-être »), s’emploie à évacuer tout risque :<br />

idéologie du « risque zéro », à sécuriser à outrance, à aseptiser l’existence quotidienne jusqu’à la rendre<br />

incapable de résister à l’intrusion des anticorps ou aux diverses adversités pourtant constitutives du<br />

donné mondain. Or il est bien connu que la crainte des abus, des excès, voire du désordre est cela même<br />

qui conduit à l’immobilisme le plus abrutissant. Conception « HOLISTIQUE » permettant la possible<br />

guérison du corps social!<br />

L’irruption des affects rappelle, tout simplement, la dialogie existant entre « chaos » et « cosmos »,<br />

entre ordre et désordre. Homo sapiens n’est tel qu’en rapport avec Homo demens. Le vitalisme est,<br />

structurellement, ambivalent. C’est parce qu’il y a de l’antinomique, de l’anomique, que peut exister<br />

un « nomos de la terre ». Une loi interne, ambiguë, plurielle, polythéiste, dont l’ambivalence n’est pas<br />

59<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

autre chose que le mouvement ou la dynamique de la nature en son entier. L’esprit et le corps en leurs<br />

pulsions diverses unis en un mixte sans fin. Après tout le « devil of the flesh » est une bonne illustration<br />

de cet esprit enraciné. N’est-ce point ainsi que la sagesse populaire nommait « affectus carnalis », affect<br />

charnel, cette pulsion humaine consistant à s’ajuster et à jouir de ce monde-ci?<br />

Ce qui est, donc, s’amorce dans l’ordonnancement sociétal où « l’amour » joue un rôle d’importance.<br />

C’est la fin de la longue domination du cognitif sur le cœur. Ce qui, ne l’oublions pas, était une<br />

intuition de A. Comte. Cela fut considéré, d’une manière quelque peu méprisante, comme l’objet<br />

de fantasmagories délirantes. Ainsi la « Religion de l’Humanité » exprimait chez lui la conviction<br />

fortement ancrée que « l’esprit n’est pas destiné à régner, mais à servir... En effet, le commandement<br />

réel exige par-dessus tout de la force, et la raison n’a jamais que de la lumière ; il faut que l’impulsion<br />

lui vienne d’ailleurs ».<br />

Remarque éclairante qui, à cause ou grâce à ses « manies » théoriques, accentue le rôle de l’impulsion<br />

autre manière de dire la dynamique humaine. De quelque nom qu’on veuille l’appeler : dynamique<br />

(dunamis : force), énergie, affect, libido, etc., il est une pulsion initiale qui, individuellement ou<br />

collectivement, est à l’origine de l’élan vital, et en assure le commandement principal. C’est en<br />

oubliant cet élément fondamental que l’on aboutit à une abstractisation de la vie sociale, corrélative au<br />

déracinement de la plante humaine!<br />

En fait, si l’on veut comprendre nombre de phénomènes actuels : hystéries musicales, rassemblements<br />

sportifs, effervescences politiques, fanatismes religieux et autres expressions de l’émotionnel, il faut<br />

peut-être se souvenir de la formule aiguë de ce même Auguste Comte : « ... l’esprit est toujours le<br />

ministre du cœur ». Et, avant qu’on ne réduise leurs œuvres à un schématisme desséché, Durkheim<br />

et les durkheimiens avaient une conception bien plus ouverte du rôle des affects dans la conscience<br />

collective. C’est ainsi qu’ils n’hésitaient pas à considérer la sociologie comme étant « la science des<br />

désirs suggérés ». Curieuse et belle formule anticipatrice, en ce qu’elle souligne le rôle pas simplement<br />

de la conscience collective, mais bien de l’inconscient commun à tous, et auquel tout un chacun, d’une<br />

manière quasiment magique, « participe » et communie.<br />

La démarche herméneutique, repérant et interprétant les signes propres à une culture, ne peut qu’être<br />

attentive à l’expression des sentiments. Ils sont « symboliques » ; et ce au sens fort du terme : processus<br />

de reconnaissance de l’autre, c’est-à-dire « naître » à soi à partir de l’altérité. C’est donc une « lumière<br />

» plus intense qui est donnée par la conjonction de la raison et des sens. Une lumière fulgurante ne<br />

se réduisant pas à la clarté offerte par la petite raison, ou par le rationalisme qui en est l’expression<br />

épistémologique. Lumière produisant cette illumination dont les diverses institutions (religieuses,<br />

60


morales, sociales) se sont toujours méfiée. Il n’en reste pas moins que c’est une telle illumination qu’il<br />

faut savoir prendre en compte si, au-delà de l’opinion savante, cette doxa bien moralisante, on veut<br />

comprendre la « mystique » sociale dont les tribus contemporaines donnent maints exemples. Et ce,<br />

tant il est vrai, si l’on ne prend pas ce terme en mauvaise part, que le nombre « d’illuminés » croît dans<br />

tous les domaines de la vie publique.<br />

Deep ecology, revival religieux, mouvements charismatiques, extrémismes politiques, fanatisme « gay<br />

», recrudescences ésotériques, mimétismes médiatiques, obsessions sportives, militantismes théoriques<br />

confondant science et engagement syndical, on peut trouver, pour le meilleur et pour le pire, une<br />

foultitude d’exemples de cette « illumination » caractéristique de l’Esprit du temps ! Et le moins que<br />

l’on puisse dire, c’est que ces « illuminés » sont pensés et agis par des conformismes logiques dont ils<br />

ne sont pas conscients. Il suffit, à cet égard, de « surfer » sur quelques « listes de diffusion » de telle<br />

association universitaire ou de telle tribu sexuelle pour mesurer l’ampleur du mimétisme.<br />

Les « lois de l’imitation » à l’œuvre dans les cas que l’on vient de citer, reposent sur la force de<br />

contagion de l’affect. C’est a priori et sans fondement réflexif que l’on agit et pense de telle ou<br />

telle manière, que l’on va promulguer des appréciations à l’emporte-pièce, et mettre en œuvre des<br />

processus inquisitoriaux. Mais c’est, également, en fonction d’un tel sentiment d’appartenance que<br />

l’on va participer à telle action caritative, vibrer à telle émotion collective et s’investir dans des formes<br />

concrètes de solidarité ou de générosité quotidiennes.<br />

Sentiment d’appartenance, rapportd’appartenance! Cette intrusion de l’affect, faisant d’une solidarité<br />

mécanique une réelle solidarité organique, participe de la structure initiatique. On ne juge pas : on<br />

suit ses maîtres. On n’exerce pas son esprit critique : mais on cherche à approfondir l’ordre des<br />

choses. On ne définit point, d’une manière ergoteuse, les « appareils idéologiques d’État », selon le<br />

patois des années 60 : mais on établit des analogies, on use de la métaphore. C’est-à-dire que d’une<br />

manière poétique, on suit à la trace un « Réel » complexe, labile et tout en dynamisme existentiel.<br />

Eventuellement, et d’une manière impulsive, on « s’indigne » collectivement. Le plus souvent on tente<br />

de s’ajuster au monde tel qu’il est, et ce afin d’en tirer le meilleur pour soi et pour la tribu à laquelle on<br />

participe. La syntonie avec le monde et avec les autres est bien le dénominateur commun à toutes les<br />

expériences vécues.<br />

Tout cela renvoie aux sous-sols de l’être-social et aux fermentations inconscientes qu’ils ne manquent<br />

pas de provoquer. D’où la nécessité, à l’encontre du savoir dominant, celui des « mécaniciens »<br />

fonctionnalistes, d’élaborer une pensée de l’organique étant en accord avec le vitalisme qui sourd par<br />

tous les pores du corps social. Voilà qui est au couer de la « guérison sociétale ». Pensée qui ne soit<br />

61<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

plus un robinet d’eau bénite, celle du moralisme, mais qui sache user de l’aristocratique liberté propre<br />

aux démarches hauturières.<br />

Ainsi que le rappelait Proust, « on devient moral quand on est malheureux »! Or, ce que l’on peut<br />

empiriquement observer c’est bien la reviviscence d’un hédonisme généralisé. Ce qui ne manque pas<br />

d’irriter les esprits chagrins préférant fulminer des analyses catastrophistes. Mais cet hédonisme est là,<br />

expression populaire de l’appetitus, cette appétence vitale dont certains bons esprits vont montrer la<br />

perdurance et la vigueur renouvelée. Le culte du corps, le plaisir de consommer, de jouir des biens de<br />

ce monde et de s’attacher au présent sont souvent décrites comme des manifestations d’une profonde «<br />

aliénation » ou d’une exploitation des corps et des esprits. Ne peut-on pas, plutôt, reconnaître là le fait<br />

qu’on se régale de la vie ?<br />

D’une vie décuplée, démultipliée, double, manifestant, au quotidien, une sagesse populaire qui sut, de<br />

tout temps, être accueillante à l’amour. À l’amour comme énergie venant du tuf de l’humain, du vivant.<br />

Un amour non castré par le constant moralisme judéo-chrétien (sémitique). Amour rémanence d’un<br />

vieux fond(s) païen et que l’on pourrait, aussi bien, nommer Éros.<br />

Il y a, en effet, un va-et-vient permanent dans l’énergétique sociétale (ce que Bergson nomme « élan<br />

vital ») entre Amour et Éros, entre ordo amoris et l’érotique sociale. Rapport d’appartenance exprimant<br />

cette pulsion, propre à l’animal humain, qui aspire à la fusion ; à rassembler ce qui est épars. Peut-être<br />

est-ce là la nostalgie de ce que Durkheim nommait le « divin social » ? L’être-ensemble comme dieu.<br />

La transcendance qui s’immanentise !<br />

C’est bien à cela que conduit l’analyse d’un ordonnancement social où l’émotionnel occupe la place<br />

principale. Ce qui implique qu’au-delà d’un rationalisme aux effets dévastateurs (destructeurs de la<br />

planète et du consensus) l’on sache intégrer l’intuition sur l’expérience mystique. L’intuition (« in-<br />

tueri », voir à l’intérieur), condition de possibilité de toute découverte scientifique étant, de ce fait,<br />

le levier méthodologique permettant de comprendre l’union étroite unissant la raison et les sens. «<br />

Ratio-vitalisme » atteignant son apogée dans les effervescences festives de tous les temps, du nôtre en<br />

particulier.<br />

Indéniable appétence pour ce monde-ci , voilà ce qui peut amener à la « guérison » ! Ce dont on<br />

trouve des racines dans l’épicurisme et le stoïcisme qui ,chacun à sa manière l’un de l’autre, portent<br />

témoignage de la radicalité mondaine d’une jouissance sachant trouver sa propre mesure dans<br />

l’interactivité existant entre la raison et les sens.<br />

62


Sens de la mesure que l’on retrouve, au Moyen Âge dans cet « amor discretus », où la « discrétion<br />

» est synonyme de discernement, c’est-à-dire de juste estimation de soi et de l’autre et, donc, du<br />

rapport d’appartenance que l’on peut établir entre l’un et l’autre. Il s’agit donc d’un amour régi par le<br />

discernement. C’est sur cette base que pouvait se constituer le lien social, celui des tribus, des « états »,<br />

des nations en une architectonique complexe, organique, où l’entendement et la sensibilité occupaient<br />

la place leur revenant.<br />

On peut rappeler comment et en quoi la « caritas », le « care », amour et désir intimement mêlés, est<br />

au fondement même de l’ « hexis » chez Aristote, ou de l’ « habitus » chez St. Thomas d’Aquin. Ces<br />

notions renvoyant à la disposition permanente de notre être nous poussant à agir en tel ou tel sens.<br />

On voit bien, ainsi, comment l’énergie libidinale est à la source même des multiples impulsions qui<br />

meuvent les individus et, donc, favorisent leurs diverses agrégations. C’est en ayant cela à l’esprit que<br />

l’on pourrait avoir une compréhension, on ne peut plus concrète, de l’action des tribus postmodernes où<br />

l’attraction affectuelle et l’impulsion émotionnelle ne manquent pas de jouer un rôle de premier plan.<br />

C’est bien ce que Spinoza, dans son naturalisme panthéiste, nommait « l’intelligence amoureuse » :<br />

cette capacité, à partir de l’affect, de « lier ensemble » (intellegere) tous les éléments épars d’un « Réel<br />

» complexe. En effet, l’intelligence en son essence n’est telle que lorsqu’elle sait rassembler ce qui est<br />

épars. Elle est, alors, concrète : elle sait croître (cum crescere) avec cela même qu’elle décrit. En bref,<br />

elle est enracinée dans la vie de tous les jours et participe, ainsi, aux passions communes.<br />

Un tel enracinement n’est pas chose aisée tant l’esprit tend à s’abstraire de cet humus qui, pourtant,<br />

constitue l’humain. C’est cette radicalité ainsi définie : retour aux racines d’un humain complexe et<br />

ambivalent, qui permet de comprendre la réactualisation contemporaine de cette « âme du monde » des<br />

néo-platoniciens. Âme inconsciente, âme affective, âme de la nature, peu importe les appellations. Il<br />

suffit de noter qu’une telle vue intuitive permet de souligner l’importance de la sortie de soi dans l’autre.<br />

Le terme empathie, fréquemment utilisé de nos jours, ne fait qu’exprimer cette interaction entre l’un et<br />

l’autre : se mettre intuiti- vement à la place de l’autre parce que l’on éprouve des sentiments communs,<br />

ou pour percevoir les conséquences d’une telle réversibilité.<br />

Ce que fait bien ressortir l’empathie c’est que Éros, en tant qu’ensemble des pulsions de vie, me pousse<br />

à être décentré par rapport à moi-même. Dans Le Banquet, Platon montre que l’Amour reconnaît son<br />

état d’indigence : l’autre est nécessaire. En bref, la perfection n’est pas dans le Moi, mais dans le Nous.<br />

C’est cette expérience mystique, dont on a vu quelques racines, que l’on va retrouver dans le New Age<br />

postmoderne : « to free oneself », se libérer de soi incitant, paradoxalement, à se lier à l’autre. Certains<br />

ont pu souligner le rapport entre cœur (cor-cordis) et corde (chorda, boyau). En ancien français « corder<br />

63<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

», s’accorder vient du cœur que l’on partage. L’amour consiste donc à s’encorder. Voilà bien le nœud<br />

gordien consti- tutif des tribus postmodernes, celui de l’interrelation. À l’opposé de l’individualisme<br />

épistémologique, c’est la prévalence d’un ordo amoris où la dépendance à l’autre (l’Autre) est<br />

primordiale.<br />

Pour exprimer autrement, on peut rappeler la position, si raisonnable, du philosophe Alain, soulignant<br />

qu’à l’encontre du « contractualisme », la société est fondée sur l’amitié ou les sentiments divers. Et<br />

qu’elle est, en ce sens, une « extension de la famille ». Ce familialisme métaphysique est bien la cause<br />

et l’effet de ce mouvement d’aimantation présidant, pour une bonne part, aux relations sociales dont<br />

le substrat, avoué ou non, est le pulsionnel, l’émotionnel, l’affectuel, toutes choses dont la composante<br />

érotique est on ne peut plus évidente.<br />

Ainsi face aux languissantes, et quelque peu sommaires, théories sociales diagnostiquant une une<br />

cachexie galopante : morosité, décadence, ennui, déclin et autres qualificatifs catastrophistes, il convient<br />

de rappeler que l’on assiste à de multiples expériences existentielles s’enracinant dans le (re)nouveau<br />

de la passion, du désir et divers affects de la même eau, dynamisant ce qui est, toujours et à nouveau,<br />

ancien et fort jeune : l’éternel vivre-ensemble.<br />

Il s’agit là de la logique de la « philia » qui, parfois souterrainement parfois, au contraire, d’une manière<br />

paroxystique, constitue l’ossature du corps social ; ce qui au-delà ou en-deçà du sentiment tragique de<br />

l’existence rend celle-ci acceptable, en tout cas plus souhaitable que son entière disparition. C’est bien<br />

la question posée par Cicéron : « qui potest esse vita vitalis, quae non in amici mutua benevolentia<br />

conquiescat», (« comment peut-on avoir une vie vivable, si elle ne pouvait trouver l’apaisement dans la<br />

mutuelle bienveillance de l’amitié »).<br />

Un tel « mutualisme » de la bienveillance est cela même qui constitue l’économie d’ensemble des<br />

échanges humains, son « relationnisme » structurel. Sagesse spécifique : écosophie, reposant sur<br />

l’interaction permanente de la raison et du sensible. Mise en perspective que l’on voit perdurer dans<br />

des termes tels que mutualité, coopératif, solidarité, toutes choses traduisant une relation durable, voire<br />

une symbiose entre des entités tout à la fois différentes et complémentaires. Il s’agit là de la « santé<br />

naturelle » de toute socialité. Socialité profonde qui, tout en étant cachée (on pourrait dire secrète,<br />

discrète) n’en constitue pas moins, sur la longue durée, la culture de tout être-ensemble. En son sens<br />

simple, le terreau, la bonne terre où celui-ci peut naître et se développer. Un enracinement dynamique<br />

en quelque sorte. Caractéristique « naturelle » à rapprocher de ce que Heidegger dit de la Phusis :<br />

émergence, épanouissement, mouvement d’éclosion.<br />

64


Ainsi : « l’être des choses aime à se cacher ». Remarque héraclitéenne soulignant la dialogie constante<br />

existant entre la profondeur et l’apparence de ce qui est. Le retrait, l’occultation, l’ombre nécessaire à<br />

l’entièreté de la vie. Cela Heidegger va le préciser dans sa critique d’une « meta » physique déniant la<br />

simple physique. C’est-à-dire refusant ce monde en fonction d’un hypothétique monde céleste, à venir<br />

ultérieurement. La Phusis désigne « le fait de se dresser en s’épanouissant, de se déployer en demeurant<br />

en soi ». Le rythme de la vie ne pouvant s’exprimer qu’à partir d’un point fixe, d’une source fondatrice<br />

permettant et légitimant l’écoulement de ce qui est. C’est bien ce que l’on peut observer dans nombre<br />

de pratiques contemporaines, en particulier juvéniles : demeurer soi-même tout en s’épanouissant vers<br />

l’extérieur. Un oxymore tel le « corporéisme mystique » fait bien ressortir le rôle et la fonction du<br />

déploiement (le corps) à partir d’une intériorité (esprit, âme) .<br />

Dynamique qui va s’exprimer dans un vivre-ensemble spécifique : celui de la « « mystique » où tout<br />

un chacun n’est qu’un élément d’un ensemble qui tout à la fois le dépasse et lui donne sens. C’est le<br />

« corps mystique » de la théologie catholique, le « corps subtil » des traditions orientales, l’égrégore<br />

de la symbolique franc-maçonne, toute choses dépassant le corps anatomique, et fondant un rapport<br />

d’appartenance, « écosophique », entre le Moi et l’altérité du monde et des autres. En quelque sorte une<br />

érotique élargie et généralisée.<br />

Au travers de l’expression « écosophie sensible », il s’agit de rendre attentif à cet irréfragable vitalisme<br />

dont les manifestations sont légion. Vitalité qui au-delà de l’utilitarisme, souligne l’importance du<br />

prix des choses sans prix : le luxe comme luxation du fonctionnalisme moderne, comme expression<br />

inconsciente d’une culture de l’instinct n’acceptant plus d’être réduite à une civilisation rationaliste.<br />

Méditons, encore, Heidegger : « Partout est l’action, et nulle part le déploiement d’un monde » (ein<br />

Welten der Welt). Or, il se trouve que c’est ce « déploiement », cette recherche de la « belle vie », d’un<br />

« plus-être » plus qu’un simple « bien-être » qui se fait jour dans une socialité spontanée outrepassant<br />

les limites d’une sociabilité raisonneuse.<br />

Cette spontanéité de la vie, et du « système » vitaliste, qui peu à peu se développe, s’exprime dans le<br />

souci de faire de l’existence une œuvre d’art au quotidien. On peut, également, en mesurer les effets<br />

dans le rôle accru accordé à l’imagination, et ce dans tous les domaines de la vie sociale. Sans oublier<br />

l’exacerbation des sentiments promouvant tous ces enthousiasmes:politiques, sociaux, caritatifs,<br />

religieux, musicaux, sportifs etc., où les passions, ou tout simplement les humeurs prennent la place du<br />

raisonnement, voire de l’entendement dans la compréhension du « Réel » social.<br />

Il y a du lyrisme dans l’air du temps, une sensibilité romantique passablement échauffée par les<br />

excitations collectives, et donnant une vision globale, holistique, de ces choses humaines que l’on<br />

65<br />

Keynote Lecture


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

avait eu tendance à singulièrement séparer. Peut-être faut-il voir là ce que M. Bakounine appelait la «<br />

régénération par l’amour ». Fourier, de son côté, célébrait une « érotosophie » exprimant le retour en<br />

force de la fantaisie et de la fantasmagorie dans l’élaboration et la confortation du lien social. Le retour<br />

des passions communes.<br />

En comprenant ce terme en son sens fort, il s’agit là de ce que Comte appelait la « culture<br />

sympathique » propre au genre humain et assurant sa « régénération morale ». Il s’agit là d’une<br />

reconnaissance de la « prépondérance du sentiment » pouvant préserver la dissolution d’un social<br />

dominé par la simple raison. Écosophie, redonnent aux sentiments une place de premier plan dans<br />

l’architectonique de la vie sociale. Songeant à la mémoire immémoriale de l’humanité, certains<br />

penseurs avaient, dès le Ie siècle, montré le retour probable de cet ordo amoris. C’est cela et cela<br />

seul qui peut permettre la régénérescence de la vie sociale.<br />

66


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Session 1<br />

Plenary Session 1<br />

Sufferings and Conflicts


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Plenary Session 1<br />

Sufferings and Conflicts<br />

1. Memories, Representations and Working through Genocides<br />

/ Daniel Feierstein (National University of Tres de Febrero)<br />

2. Nepal Searching for Democratic Soul<br />

/ Narayan Wagle (Author/Journalist)<br />

3. Clinical Healing or Pathological Reflection: the Imagination that<br />

Links Auschwitz with Fukushima<br />

/ Kyung Sik Suh (Tokyo Keizai University)<br />

4. Gilgamesh: A Mesopotamian Epic in Modern War<br />

/ Wai Chee Dimock (Yale University)


Memories, Representations and Working through Genocides<br />

Daniel Feierstein<br />

National University of Tres de Febrero<br />

This paper analyzes the consequences of terror on the identities of genocide survivors. It starts from the<br />

assumption that genocide in the modern world seeks to transform and reorganize the social fabric. Massive<br />

state violence is thus seen as instrumental and serving a broader objective: the breakdown, destruction and<br />

transformation of the identity of the survivors. This approach is rooted in Raphael Lemkin’s pioneering<br />

definition of genocide, but also in a careful analysis of the socio-political outcomes of Nazism and<br />

Stalinism, as well as those of the National Security doctrine, a counterinsurgency strategy developed by<br />

the CIA in the 1950s and 1960s and later implemented throughout Latin America.<br />

Although the focus of this paper is on the genocide carried out by Argentina’s last military government<br />

between 1976 and 1983, the example chosen can equally serve as an historical analogy for other cases<br />

of modern genocide. Of particular importance for comparative genocide studies, the paper examines<br />

how different legal definitions of social conflict – war, genocide and crimes against humanity – give<br />

rise to different narratives and different types of collective memory. In particular, it considers the<br />

impact these definitions have had or may have in the future on the collective working—through of the<br />

traumatic experience in terms of memory, representation and identity. It shows how each narrative mode<br />

of representation (war, genocide, crimes against humanity) defines and constructs the victims and the<br />

perpetrators in different ways. It also shows how each of these modes leads to analogies with different<br />

historical events, suggesting different causal explanations for what occurred and stimulating very different<br />

modes of intergenerational transmission and ways of relating to the present and to others.<br />

<strong>The</strong> purpose of terror is to destroy the self and the main outcome of trauma following systematic terror is<br />

the destruction of identity together with a breakdown of self-confidence and, consequently, of confidence<br />

in others. This has been the rationale of torture since the late Middle Ages, when it was first used by<br />

the Inquisition as part of the embryonic technology of power that would only become fully developed<br />

71<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

in the twentieth century. Now, torture—which is a recurrent feature of modern genocide - would be<br />

unnecessary if the goal were simply to defeat or disarm the enemy. Torture sets out to achieve more than<br />

the destruction of the will to fight. Torture aims to erase the victims’ identity by forcing them to say or do<br />

things they should not say or do, such as denying their religious, national, political or sexual convictions,<br />

providing information that will harm loved ones, or giving their affection or sexuality to a subject that<br />

repels them.<br />

<strong>The</strong> most typical psychological response to memories of a traumatic experience is to block them from<br />

consciousness. <strong>The</strong> feeling remains but, because the memories cannot be processed in narrative form, they<br />

cannot be modified. Instead, they produce dislocations of identity; for example, repressed feelings are<br />

responsible for such diverse mental health problems such as phobias, hysteria, obsessions and repetition<br />

compulsion. Thus, unprocessed feelings are “played out” in endless ways that are harmful or problematic<br />

for the subjects and/or their social environment. However, what is repressed is only the subjective<br />

experience of the event that took place, not the event itself.<br />

At the social level, repetition compulsion is related to a transubjective phenomenon Kaës (1989) calls<br />

the ‘denegative pact,’ that is, an unconscious agreement not to mention the traumatic event. <strong>The</strong> pact<br />

shares the logic of repetition compulsion, but it also establishes a consensus that did not exist when the<br />

trauma was repressed. It operates on individual subjectivity, destroying any vestige of self-confidence<br />

that those involved in the pact may have had previously and preventing them from appropriating their<br />

own history. <strong>The</strong> pact alienates individuals not only from their own experience but from any narrative<br />

account of the traumatic event. <strong>The</strong>y remain detached and unable to relate such stories to their own<br />

experience.<br />

But this pact is not only maintained in and through silence. Various discourses about the traumatic<br />

past help to produce a collective distancing and alienation from the traumatic event by using narrative<br />

procedures that deliberately exclude the first person and construct the narration as something that<br />

happened to others. At the same time, trauma produces a desensitization which, like repression, operates<br />

at the individual and subjective level, but also has cumulative social and historical effects. When<br />

caused by events affecting large population groups, this accumulated desensitization is experienced as<br />

meaninglessness and may be accompanied by cynicism or nihilism, satire or ridicule. In ideological<br />

terms it is expressed as the impossibility of trying to understand the traumatic event. Here, a deliberate<br />

and ideologically justified refusal to seek one’s own identity will be called the ideology of nonsense. This<br />

ideology is a more extreme form of repression because, far from challenging the denegative pact, it seeks<br />

to voice it at a conscious level, giving it narrative solidity and restoring some sort of coherent identity by<br />

denying the very existence of the self that was previously destroyed.<br />

72


<strong>The</strong> importance of narrative for nearly every area of our lives is now widely recognized. In the field<br />

of neuroscience, one of the most important discoveries of the last thirty years is that memories are not<br />

stored in the brain as complete video recordings of events, but as a set of fragmented and disordered<br />

experiences from which sense has to be made through a narrative or story. In the field of gross human<br />

rights violations, it is impossible to decide which explanatory framework best fits a particular historical<br />

event unless we consider the alternative narratives each one generates and its implications for working<br />

through trauma and rebuilding personal identities. This is especially true in an applied discipline such as<br />

law, where there may be fundamental disagreements about how events should be defined. 1<br />

Concepts are not facts - even though social scientists, historians and lawyers often confuse the two.<br />

Concepts are mental constructs – interpretative frameworks used to make sense of the facts. Thus, in the<br />

case of human rights violations in Argentina in the 1970s, it is impossible to decide whether or not these<br />

occurred, for example, in the context of a war or genocide simply by appealing to the facts (for example,<br />

the number of skirmishes and casualties; or the number of rapes, kidnappings and disappearances) because<br />

a number of different concepts can potentially explain the same facts.<br />

More than any other discipline, law plays a key role in the collective working through of trauma following<br />

systematic mass violence. This is partly because courts are authorized to detain and punish wrongdoers<br />

but also because judges’ sentencing decisions tend to become collectively sanctioned truths and stories.<br />

<strong>The</strong> important point to remember is that different concepts organize facts in different ways, giving the<br />

‘same’ facts different meanings. <strong>The</strong>se meanings will inevitably be influenced by social attitudes towards<br />

the events in question.<br />

Reviewing the different legal concepts<br />

<strong>The</strong> widespread and systematic human rights violations committed in Argentina between 1976 and<br />

1983 can and have been described in numerous ways. Some descriptions have changed over time or<br />

have acquired greater or lesser social acceptance at different moments during and after the dictatorship.<br />

However, in legal terms these descriptions can be grouped under three separate categories, each with its<br />

own discourse. <strong>The</strong>se categories are: war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity. In Argentina, the<br />

area of legal discourse is marked by an ongoing dispute over the meaning of two of these (genocide and<br />

crimes against humanity) while the third (war) has been appropriated by the defence lawyers and political<br />

supporters of those responsible for the crimes, both as a weapon to legitimize the defendants’ actions and<br />

This does not mean that it is not possible to make a doctrinal analysis of the possible defi nitions, but this belongs to an-<br />

This does not mean that it is not possible to make a doctrinal analysis of the possible definitions, but this belongs to another<br />

level of discussion, involves not memory processes and representation but the construction of lawsuits.<br />

73<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

as a tool to secure their acquittal.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se categories are not mutually exclusive or contradictory. On the contrary, some sociologists and<br />

historians work with two and even all three simultaneously. 2 Nevertheless, the different chains of<br />

reasoning associated with each concept lead not only to widely different understandings of Argentine<br />

history, but to different symbolic outcomes for trials and sentences. Consequently, both factors impact<br />

differently on the collective working through of trauma.<br />

War<br />

<strong>The</strong> discourse of war has taken many different forms in Argentina, some totally at odds with others,<br />

politically and ideologically. Moreover, although this discourse shaped common-sense understandings<br />

of the events at the time, it became quickly discredited after the dictatorship. Nowadays, it is kept alive<br />

among sectors of Argentine society close to the perpetrators, by a minority of former members of armed<br />

leftist organizations, and by small groups of academics.<br />

All the different discourses of war agree that the 1976-1983 military repression originated in the political<br />

climate and social mobilization of the late nineteen sixties. For the military and their civilian accomplices<br />

and sympathizers, the very essence of Argentine identity was threatened by subversion from abroad –<br />

a subversion instigated by Communists, atheists and Freemasons, among others. On the other hand,<br />

the armed leftist organizations saw ‘war’ as a response from the ruling bloc to the radicalization of the<br />

poorer classes and the emergence of militarized Peronist and/or Marxist revolutionary vanguards. In their<br />

view, the military coup of 1976 was a counter-revolutionary backlash to the expansion of socialism in<br />

Argentina, an expansion which began after the Peronist resistance movement (1955-1973) turned to the<br />

Cuban Revolution for inspiration and started to preach insurrection.<br />

<strong>The</strong> concept of “dirty war,” 3 used by the perpetrators refers to the fact that fighting did not take place in<br />

2 Such a combination is clearly present (even in the title) in Ines Izaguirre et al, Lucha de clases, guerra civil y genocidio en<br />

la Argentina, 1973-1983. Antecedentes. Desarrollo. Complicidades, (Class struggle, civil war and genocide in Argentina,<br />

1973-1983. Background. Development. Complicity), Buenos Aires, Eudeba, 2009. It clearly and explicitly juxtaposes the<br />

concepts of civil war and genocide and expressly excludes the notion of crimes against humanity. <strong>The</strong>ir work is based on<br />

the previous works by Juan Carlos Marín, who started by viewing the events as war but quickly adopted the concept of<br />

genocide.<br />

3 Note that the concept of “dirty war,” created by the perpetrators and used exclusively by them in Argentina, now<br />

dominates foreign literature on the topic. From the twenty-first century, the term “dirty war” has been adopted by several<br />

Argentine academics who had deliberately ignored the term in the past without explaining in what sense the concept is<br />

used, how it relates to the perpetrators’ vision of the period, or what political and moral weight it presupposes, deriving<br />

as it does from French counterinsurgency doctrines. See its use, for example, in Marcos Novaro and Vicente Palermo, La<br />

74


the open on conventional battlefields. Because the insurgents were irregulars, clandestine police repression<br />

of civilian populations supporting guerrilla movements was thought to be more effective than directly<br />

targeting the guerrillas themselves. In fact, as is widely known, this counterinsurgency doctrine was first<br />

implemented by the French in Indochina and Algeria and later spread throughout Latin America by the<br />

U.S. School of the Americas.<br />

Using the concept of war in the case of Argentina presupposes that:<br />

) <strong>The</strong>re were two social groups involved in the conflict, both with military capability and political power.<br />

2) War was a logical consequence of the escalating violence in Argentina. <strong>The</strong>refore, whatever the Armed<br />

Forces set out to defend (the nation, the institutions, the status quo, oligarchic power), they were<br />

fighting in a “defensive” way.<br />

3) <strong>The</strong> terror unleashed on Argentine society after the coup of 1976 was an unintended consequence of the<br />

Armed Forces’ decision to fight left-wing violence.<br />

Genocide<br />

<strong>The</strong> concept of genocide refers to a premeditated and organised attempt to spread terror throughout<br />

society. Terror is not a by-product but a fundamental part of the genocide process. To argue that<br />

Argentina suffered genocide means, among other things, that there was a plan to reorganize society<br />

which sought to destroy social identity and social relations based on cooperation among autonomous<br />

agents. This destruction was brought about by killing a significant part of the national group (significant<br />

in number or in importance) and by using the terror thus caused to establish new forms of social<br />

relations and identity. 4<br />

Using the concept of genocide in the case of Argentina presupposes that:<br />

1) <strong>The</strong> victims can no longer be divided into ‘guilty’ or ‘innocent’ because terror is directed against the<br />

whole of society, including the perpetrators and their families. <strong>The</strong> definition of the enemy as “subversive<br />

criminals” is deliberately ambiguous and may include, as the Argentine perpetrators put it in one<br />

infamous public statement “the rebels’ accomplices, supporters, the indifferent and the timid.” 5 Terror<br />

dictadura militar 1976/1983. Del golpe de Estado a la restauración democrática, (<strong>The</strong> military dictatorship 1976/1983.<br />

From the coup to the restoration of democracy), Buenos Aires, Paidós, 2003.<br />

4 Daniel Feierstein, El genocidio como práctica social. Entre el nazismo experiencia argentina, (Genocide as a social<br />

practice. Between Nazism and the Argentine experience), FCE, Buenos Aires, 2007. p. 83.<br />

5 Statements by the then de facto Governor of the Province of Buenos Aires, Ibérico Saint Jean, to the International Herald<br />

Tribune, May 26, 1977.<br />

75<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

was not a side-effect of a crackdown on armed leftist groups nor did the military aim primary to defeat<br />

these groups. <strong>The</strong> Argentine military used concentration camps to terrorize the Argentine national group<br />

as a whole, not just to intern radical or militarized groups.<br />

2) <strong>The</strong> military repression in Argentina was not a reaction to escalating violence but a project of social<br />

reorganization patiently and persistently pursued even before armed leftist organizations existed in<br />

Argentina and before the poorer sections of the Argentine population became radicalised. Although it<br />

was implemented with the excuse of a “fight against subversion,” it was in fact part of a continent-wide<br />

project - expressed in the National Security Doctrine - and so independent of whether local insurgent<br />

organizations posed any real threat of revolution. <strong>The</strong> existence of a continent-wide “reorganizing”<br />

project is obvious from the fact that it was implemented not only in countries like El Salvador, where<br />

there was almost certainly a civil war, but in countries like Guatemala and Argentina, where insurgent<br />

forces had no conventional military combat capability, and even in countries like Chile and Bolivia,<br />

where there were almost no armed actions against the State.<br />

3) <strong>The</strong> military repression was not a “defensive reaction” to left-wing violence, but rather an “offensive<br />

action.” It took advantage of the violence perpetrated by left-wing organizations to legitimatize its<br />

own use of terror but it was in no way dependent on these organizations. On the contrary it was, in<br />

principle, more or less independent of the guerrilla forces in the region. It had its own project - one that<br />

used concentration camps and terror to transform social relations based on reciprocity and cooperation<br />

into relations based on individualism and mutual suspicion. It sought to use informants and betrayal to<br />

destroy and/or transform patterns of social ties and with them, social and personal identity.<br />

It is worth pointing out that this particular way of conceiving and narrating genocide is less common<br />

outside Argentina. In most other cases genocide has been regarded as the result of racial or ethnic<br />

confrontation. Thus, there is a clear difference between studies of repression in Guatemala, which tend to<br />

stress the indigenous status of the victims, at the same time depoliticizing them, and studies of repression<br />

in Argentina, where race and ethnicity played only a marginal role.<br />

Crimes against humanity<br />

Using the concept of crimes against humanity in the case of Argentina presupposes that:<br />

1) <strong>The</strong> victims are seen as individual “citizens” persecuted by the State. <strong>The</strong> big difference between<br />

crimes against humanity and genocide lies in the fact that that genocide sees the victims as members of<br />

a “national group” whereas crimes against humanity treats them as politicized individuals who have<br />

suffered violations of their individual rights (to life, physical integrity, safety, or welfare). <strong>The</strong> victims<br />

76


of crimes against humanity are persecuted for their “convictions”, which are thought of as part of a<br />

“voluntary” identity they can adopt or discard at will - as opposed to an “involuntary” ethnic or national<br />

identity that people are born into. 6<br />

2) <strong>The</strong> discourse of crimes against humanity includes the notion of a “terrorist state” but unlike the<br />

discourses of war and genocide, it presents no consistent explanation about when or why the Argentine<br />

State began to commit these crimes. For example, the 1984 report Nunca Más (Never Again) drawn up<br />

by CONADEP (the National Commission on the Disappearance of Persons) takes the view that state<br />

terrorism was an excessive and disproportionate response to left-wing political violence. Other authors,<br />

however, see state terrorism as an independent project, much more in line with the concept of genocide.<br />

In summary, the concept of “crimes against humanity” as applied in Argentina allows for two types of<br />

causal explanation of the repression (i.e. as a reaction to left-wing violence or as an independent project)<br />

while sharing a roughly similar vision of the victims as politicized individuals.<br />

It is instructive to examine other historical cases in which only one of these frameworks - war crimes,<br />

genocide and crimes against humanity - is generally accepted. For example, Spain undeniably waged a<br />

civil war between 1936 and 1939, with conventional battles fought by more or less professional armies.<br />

This has tended to exclude the possibility of interpreting the murder and torture carried out by the Franco<br />

regime during and after the Spanish Civil War as instances of genocide, even though the number of<br />

atrocities far exceeded those committed in Argentina between 1976 and 1983 and genocide might prove to<br />

be a much more revealing explanation.<br />

According to a recent estimate, 150,000 people were murdered by right-wing Nationalists during the<br />

Spanish Civil War and a further 20,000 were executed after the war had ended, with an additional 50,000<br />

put to death by the Republicans. 7 <strong>The</strong>se killings are quite separate from the 200,000 soldiers killed in<br />

combat. One cannot help but wonder to what extent the conventional picture of a two-sided military<br />

conflict has made it impossible to obtain justice for atrocities committed far from the battlefront and for<br />

Spanish society as a whole to work through these traumatic events.<br />

<strong>The</strong> conventional view of the Spanish Civil War as war makes it difficult to appreciate that the systematic<br />

6 For the legal characterization of this discourse, see the amicus curiae presented by the Nizkor organization in the case<br />

heard in Spain against Adolfo Scilingo. <strong>The</strong> document can be found on the site www.radionizkor.org and was one of the<br />

items referred to by the Court of Spain to change the initial charge of genocide for one of crimes against humanity.<br />

7 Paul Preston, <strong>The</strong> Spanish Holocaust: Inquisition and Extermination in Twentieth-Century Spain, London, 2012.<br />

77<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

terror exercised by Franco’s forces affected the whole of Spanish society (not just the Republican<br />

sectors). It also makes it more difficult to identify those responsible. Just to give one example: Spanish<br />

society still shows an almost complete lack of interest in the children appropriated by their parents’<br />

murderers during and after the Spanish Civil War. In contrast, the efforts of the Grandmothers of<br />

Plaza de Mayo to uncover similar cases in Argentina have been well publicised. This discrepancy is<br />

surprising since the number of stolen children is calculated at around 500 in Argentina as opposed to<br />

30,000 in Spain, where the Spanish Catholic Church was involved in a clandestine adoption network.<br />

<strong>The</strong> link between memory and the present: we live in a “remembered present”<br />

Having described the three main ways human rights violations in Argentina are generally interpreted, I<br />

will now analyze their different implications for the present. As we will see, each interpretation impacts<br />

differently on our ability to work through terror, facilitating or hindering our capacity to work through<br />

and appropriate the past. I will consider five dimensions that can be affected by different interpretations of<br />

events:<br />

a) how the victims are described;<br />

b) how meaning is assigned to events;<br />

c) the types of analogies and comparisons allowed for by each interpretation;<br />

d) the necessary actions for working through terror and/or preventing its reappearance;<br />

e) generational transmission and mourning and the types of appropriation or alienation that each<br />

interpretation tends to produce.<br />

a) How the victims are described<br />

<strong>The</strong> criminal legal system uses the term victim to describe people affected both directly and indirectly by<br />

criminal actions. <strong>The</strong> concept of “indirect victim” will be useful when examining the effects of different<br />

narrative approaches and how they construct people as victims. <strong>The</strong> concept of “indirect victim” allows<br />

for a broader understanding of who is affected by terror and what relationship – if any - exists between the<br />

two types of victim.<br />

1) Although the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 extended civilian protection during times of war,<br />

the idea that the victims of armed conflict have a right to compensation was not seriously discussed<br />

until the 1990s and the positions of various courts and scholars vary considerably. Moreover, we<br />

have to distinguish between rights under international and national law, and between rights vis-<br />

à-vis a State or a non-State actor. Nevertheless, it is clear that the only victims in a war are those<br />

78


civilians harmed by lawful or unlawful conduct. <strong>The</strong> combatants in an armed conflict do not generally<br />

think of war as a crime or see themselves and the enemy as victims, whether direct or indirect.<br />

2) For those who claim that human rights violations committed in Argentina between 1976 and 1983 were<br />

genocide, however, the indirect victim is the Argentine national group. Genocide does not target specific<br />

political opponents or individual citizens, but the whole group; that is why the notion of “destruction of<br />

a group” is specific to the concept of genocide. This focus on the group poses a different approach to<br />

the relationship between victims and perpetrators. Even the perpetrators are, in a sense, victims, in that<br />

torture and murder have left indelible marks on them as well as on the rest of society. <strong>The</strong>y, too, suffer<br />

a breakdown of social ties radically different from that which is produced by other conflicts, including<br />

war.<br />

3) <strong>The</strong> discourse of crimes against humanity does not set up a binary opposition between two more<br />

or less evenly matched opponents, as in war, but between the state and the rights of the individual<br />

citizen. This liberal approach sees the State as committing crimes against individuals whose rights<br />

it is supposed to guarantee. Consequently, victims – whether direct or indirect - are citizens whose<br />

rights have been violated in some way by clandestine and illegal repression. <strong>The</strong> big difference with<br />

genocide is that they are affected as individual citizens, rather than as members of a broader group.<br />

It is worth pointing out here that there is clear connection between the discourse of “crimes against<br />

humanity” and the concept of the “responsibility to protect”, a more recent discourse used to legitimize<br />

neo-colonial military interventions. <strong>The</strong> most direct and emblematic of these has been the bombing of<br />

the Libyan people during 20 and the intervention to overthrow Gaddafi’s dictatorial regime, with the<br />

intention of imposing a government more sympathetic to U.S. and European interests, particularly in the<br />

management of Libyan oil and the control of a geopolitically vital territory. 8<br />

b) How meaning is assigned to events<br />

<strong>The</strong> meaning of state-sponsored mass violence also varies depending on whether we describe<br />

them as war crimes, genocide or crimes against humanity. Except in rare cases of stalemate like<br />

8 For a geopolitical discussion of genocide and crimes against humanity and their redefinition in neo-imperialist terms,<br />

see Daniel Feierstein, “Getting Things into Perspective”, in Genocide Studies and Prevention. An International Journal,<br />

University of Toronto Press, vol. 4, no. 2, 2009, pp. 155-160, “<strong>The</strong> Good, the Bad and the Invisible. A Critical Look of the<br />

MARO Report “, in Genocide Studies and Prevention. An International Journal, University of Toronto Press, vol. 6, no.<br />

1, 2011, pp. 39-44.<br />

79<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

the Korean War, the outcome of a war is usually defined in terms of victory and defeat. Thus,<br />

whatever their ideological perspective, those who interpret events in Argentina in terms of a<br />

civil war agree that the war resulted in a clear victory for the military regime. For the defeated,<br />

the primary focus is mainly on analyzing battles in order to understand where they went wrong.<br />

From the perspective of genocide, however, the meaning of the events far exceeds military strategy<br />

and tactics. After genocide, it is more important to understand how the national group and the social<br />

fabric have been transformed. In the case of Argentina, the defeat of the different guerrilla forces by the<br />

Argentine military is seen as less important than the radical transformation of society as a whole. Thus, the<br />

key issues implicit in the notion of “destruction of a group” as opposed to the more liberal “destruction of<br />

individuals” are: ) what Argentine society was like before it was transformed by terror; 2) how terror was<br />

internalized; and 3) how it continued to operate in society after the dictatorship had ended.<br />

From the perspective of crimes against humanity, meaning derives from the binary opposition of<br />

individual vs. the State. In this view, when the State abuses freedom and individual rights (human rights),<br />

individual autonomy is stifled and individuals are suffocated within a mass society where they are unable,<br />

either partially or wholly, to exercise their individuality.<br />

c) Types of analogies and comparisons allowed for by each interpretation<br />

<strong>The</strong> third focus of our analysis is the relationship between memory and the present. What other historical<br />

events does each narrative model typically bring to mind? Here we are particularly interested in how<br />

representations of the past affect current behaviour, learning or orientation towards the present and future.<br />

In Argentina, the term ‘revolutionary war’ tends to evoke a range of historical events from the prototype of<br />

the Russian revolution to revolutions closer to home, especially those in Cuba, Nicaragua or El Salvador.<br />

But not all such events are linked to mass annihilation. Several revolutionary and counter-revolutionary<br />

wars of the 1970s and 1980s were accompanied by state-sponsored genocide. This was especially true<br />

of El Salvador but also - to a lesser degree - Nicaragua and perhaps Guatemala. However, no mass<br />

annihilations were committed by either side during or after the Cuban revolution, which served as a model<br />

for the Latin American guerrilla movements until the 1990s. Nevertheless, where war and genocide did<br />

co-exist, an emphasis on one has tended to render the other invisible. In particular, genocide is apt to be<br />

written off as wartime excesses. This has an unfortunate effect on memory processes since transforming<br />

genocide into a by-product of revolutionary struggle somehow prevents us from examining it critically.<br />

<strong>The</strong> term ‘genocide’ tends to suggest the Holocaust, despite the numerous other extermination processes<br />

80


that have taken place since 1945. But comparisons with the Holocaust can be misleading as well as<br />

enlightening. First, the Nazis’ apparent obsession with race has little or nothing to do with destruction<br />

processes in Latin America. Although this is clear in the case of Argentina, an overemphasis on racism as<br />

a motive for annihilating Guatemala’s indigenous population between 1960 and 1996 tends to obscure the<br />

political intentions that guided the process. I use the word “apparent” advisedly because, as I have argued<br />

elsewhere, Jewish identity was targeted for destruction by the Nazis more for political than for ethnic<br />

reasons. 9<br />

However, the concept of “partial destruction of the national group” not only allows us to break with the<br />

myth that genocide is driven by “irrational” hatred; it allows us to understand all the annihilations that<br />

have taken place during the modern era. And by recognizing that State violence is intended to affect the<br />

survivors as much as the direct victims, we are able to recognize more easily its effects in the present.<br />

We are also able to demand various collective responsibilities and, in doing so, to change the processes<br />

whereby we appropriate events or remain alienated from them.<br />

One positive aspect of analogies with the Holocaust is that after <strong>World</strong> War II an international consensus<br />

was forged that these crimes could not go unpunished. In Argentina, a popular catchphrase during the final<br />

years of the military dictatorship clearly expressed the rejection of impunity: “Even if you go to ground,<br />

like the Nazis you’ll be found”.<br />

<strong>The</strong> term “crimes against humanity” does not clearly conjure up any one historical event. Among the<br />

many human rights violations of the past, perhaps those committed by the Nazis are the most significant<br />

in scope and scale. But the Third Reich is associated in most people’s minds with genocide rather than the<br />

violation of individual rights. Instead, the most paradigmatic examples of “crimes against humanity” are<br />

likely to occur in the future, as new and increasingly broader international regulations and institutional<br />

bodies are created. Let us not forget that the International Tribunals and the International Criminal Court,<br />

as well as around half the current International Human Rights Conventions were not created until after the<br />

military dictatorship in Argentina had ended.<br />

Now that the anticommunist crusade of the Cold War era has been discredited, the neo-imperialist tool 10 to<br />

9 See: Daniel Feierstein, El genocidio como práctica social. Entre el nazismo experiencia argentina, (Genocide as a social<br />

practice. Between Nazism and the Argentine experience), FCE, Buenos Aires, 2007.<br />

10 For a discussion of this issue, see Daniel Feierstein, “El peligro del redireccionamiento de los conceptos del derecho in-<br />

“El peligro del redireccionamiento de los conceptos del derecho internacional:<br />

las Naciones Unidas, la Corte Penal Internacional y el nuevo papel de los ee.u u.” (<strong>The</strong> danger of reformulat-<br />

(<strong>The</strong> danger of reformulating<br />

the concepts of international law: the United Nations, the International Criminal Court and the new role of the U.S.),<br />

Revista de Estudios sobre Genocidio (Journal of Genocide Studies), Buenos Aires, EDUNTREF, vol. 3, November<br />

81<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

legitimize international intervention is a human rights discourse preaching the “responsibility to protect”<br />

civilians and even the war on terror. This new direction in international order and international criminal<br />

law could be seen clearly in the US’s direct military intervention in Libya in 2011 after the UN authorised<br />

the use of “all necessary measures” to prevent attacks on civilians.<br />

Interestingly, the concept chosen to justify these new policies is the vaguest and most ambiguous of<br />

those discussed so far - “crimes against humanity”. In international criminal law, war and genocide are<br />

considered much more restrictively and this makes it far more difficult for “the international community”<br />

to intervene and “protect” on the basis of half-baked media reports alone. To prove the existence of a war<br />

or genocide there must be clear objective evidence (territorial control or professionalized armies for war;<br />

the intent to destroy a group for genocide). Yet it seems more and more that any act of state violence-and<br />

even non-state violence, as far as the International Criminal Court and some others are concerned - can be<br />

quickly classified as crimes against humanity.<br />

Thus, the concept of crimes against humanity is being progressively devalued as totally different practices<br />

are conflated. If the twentieth century was in Mark Levene’s view “the century of genocide, the twenty-<br />

first century may soon become one where crimes against humanity are used to legitimize and morally<br />

justify military intervention in cases where violence is not state-sponsored and/or not systematic, or where<br />

it may not even exist at all. Paradoxically, such interventions to “prevent” human rights abuses end up<br />

creating many more victims than they were intended to protect, while international “peacekeeping” forces<br />

use international resolutions to punish the perpetrators for their own purposes.<br />

d) Working through terror and preventing its reappearance<br />

It is clear, then, that different meanings and emotions are attached to war crimes, genocide and crimes<br />

against humanity, largely because of the different historical analogies that each category brings to mind.<br />

Consequently, each category suggests the need for a different course of action in the present. In this sense<br />

these different representations also play an eminently political role by mediating the link between memory<br />

of the past and present action.<br />

For those on the left who support the idea of a “dirty war” in Argentina, the task ahead is to continue the<br />

“struggle” on the cultural level. Public opinion has turned against the perpetrators and in favour of putting<br />

them on trial again; supporters of the “dirty war” hypothesis insist, fortunately with little success so far, on<br />

2009, pp. 83-97.<br />

82


the need to strip the “alleged victims” of their the “aura of martyrdom” and reformulate our understanding<br />

of the years before the dictatorship. Although such discourses are promoted by a minority of Argentineans,<br />

they have a wide following in the case of the Spanish Civil War because of the strong dominance of the<br />

discourse of war which excludes other visions of the conflict.<br />

For those who think in terms of genocide in Argentina, the ways of “working through” are very different.<br />

Because the whole national group was affected, terror needs to be worked through at a group level. <strong>The</strong><br />

social transformations that took place cannot be reversed by mere individual acts of will because they<br />

are anchored in a shared collective unconscious. Any attempt at prevention must take into account the<br />

tremendous force of what Freud calls repetition compulsion (the psychic need to repeat the unprocessed<br />

trauma again and again) as well as denegative pacts (a social phenomenon that reveals to what lengths<br />

individuals will go to repress trauma) and the various additional processes of desensitization. <strong>The</strong> rallying<br />

cry of “never again” heard at so many remembrance ceremonies must be understood in this context as an<br />

attempt to deny this compulsion to repeat the past. But trauma can only be worked through slowly and<br />

patiently – perhaps only when we have done a thorough job of discovering its complex and intricate scars<br />

on the collective psyche.<br />

For those who prefer the explanation of crimes against humanity, however, working through is fraught<br />

with obstacles. It is no coincidence that supporters of this view tend to practise denial. <strong>The</strong>y attempt to<br />

“turn the page” on history through a wholesale condemnation of violence and the past in which subversive<br />

activity and state repression are lumped together as one. <strong>The</strong>y do not understand that justice is the<br />

fundamental tool that would allow the past to be laid to rest.<br />

e) Generational transmission and mourning and the types of appropriation or alienation<br />

Abraham and Torok have developed an interesting notion to describe this level: the crypt. According to<br />

the authors:<br />

<strong>The</strong> unspeakable words and sentences, linked as they are to memories of great libidinal and<br />

narcissistic value, cannot accept their exclusion. From their hideaway in the imaginary crypt-into<br />

which fantasy had thrust them to hibernate lifeless, anesthetized, and designified- the unspeakable<br />

words never cease their subversive action. 11<br />

11 Nicolas Abraham and Maria Torok,<br />

Nicolas Abraham and Maria Torok, <strong>The</strong> Shell and the Kernel: Renewals of Psychoanalysis, Volume 1. Edited and translated<br />

by Nicholas T. Rand. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press, 1994, p. 132.<br />

83<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

<strong>The</strong>y add that.<br />

Should a child have parents ‘with secrets,’ parents whose speech is not exactly complementary<br />

to their unstated repressions, he will receive from them a gap in the unconscious, an unknown,<br />

unrecognized knowledge — a nescience — subjected to a form of “repression” before the fact. <strong>The</strong><br />

“buried speech of the parent” will be “a dead gap without a burial place in the child. This unknown<br />

phantom returns from the unconscious to haunt its host and may lead to phobias, madness, and<br />

obsessions. Its effect can persist through several generations and determine the fate of an entire<br />

family line. 12<br />

Thus, these experiences, repressed and unprocessed in one generation, are unconsciously transmitted<br />

to the next generation. As the team at Chile’s Centre for Mental Health and Human Rights (CINTRAS)<br />

explains:<br />

<strong>The</strong> contents of the crypt are unspeakable for the subject because, despite being present psychically<br />

in the person who has lived them, they cannot talk about it. Because they are transmitted to the<br />

next generation as a phantom and cannot be represented verbally, they become nameless, their<br />

contents are unknown, but their existence can generate psychic disturbances. In the generation of<br />

the grandchildren, they generate unthinkable thoughts, because this generation is not aware that a<br />

secret hangs over an unresolved trauma. This can result in symptoms, bizarre feelings and emotions<br />

that occur without any apparent correlation with the psychic life of the family. 13<br />

Haydeé Faimberg describes this transgenerational transmission of trauma as “alienating identification”<br />

or “generational telescoping”, as the older generations’ experiences overrun those of their children and<br />

grandchildren. 14 <strong>The</strong> image comes from 19th century accounts of train accidents in which wagons were<br />

described as collapsing into each other like a folding telescope. Here we will examine how the different<br />

legal concepts discussed so far can affect this phenomenon.<br />

12 Ibid, p. 140.<br />

13 c i n t r a s, “Daño transgeneracional en descendientes de sobrevivientes de tortura” (Transgenerational damage in the offspring<br />

of survivors of torture), in c i n t r a s, eatip, g t n m/r j y sersoc, Daño transgeneracional. Consecuencias de la represión<br />

política en el Cono Sur, Santiago de Chile, Unión Europea-Gráfica l o m, 2009, pp. 48-49.<br />

14 For the concept of generational telescoping, see Haydeé Faimberg, “El telescopaje (encaje) de las generaciones - acerca<br />

For the concept of generational telescoping, see Haydeé Faimberg, “El telescopaje (encaje) de las generaciones - acerca<br />

de la genealogía de ciertas identificaciones” (“<strong>The</strong> telescoping of generations - on the genealogy of certain identifications”)<br />

in René Kaës, Haydeé Faimberg and others, Transmisión de la vida psíquica entre generaciones (Transmission<br />

of psychic life between generations), Buenos Aires, Amorrortu, 2006 (first edition, 996).<br />

84


In the discourses of war and crimes against humanity, generational imprinting leads to relatively<br />

incoherent transgenerational legacy. In the case of war, the fallen are constructed as heroes and the mode<br />

of mourning tends to be melancholic. In the case of crimes against humanity, the tendency towards an<br />

abstract and blanket condemnation of all types of violence leads to detachment and so to denial. 15<br />

However, the idea of a militarized conflict between the guerrillas and Armed Forces has lost ground in<br />

Argentina, at least since the end of the Cold War, while the idea of a repressive, centralized State has also<br />

lost legitimacy. Even if we accept that there was a war in Argentina, the notions of war crimes and crimes<br />

against humanity produce visions of the past that are difficult to appropriate for the younger generations<br />

that have never participated in a war. Moreover, despite all the shortcomings of contemporary democracy<br />

in Argentina, the overwhelming majority of the population votes in elections and so governments are<br />

lawfully elected. If freedom of expression is still limited, this is not due to State censorship of the media<br />

but, as in other democratic countries, to the power of media corporations and other economic groups.<br />

Thus, the generation born after the dictatorship is dislocated from both types of discourse. For those who<br />

did not live through the events the discourses of war crimes and crimes against humanity tend to sound<br />

contrived since those who supposedly confronted each other in war no longer speak of continuing the<br />

military conflict, while a return of the military dictatorship is no longer a real threat to democracy. This<br />

younger generation tends to feel increasingly alienated by the discourse of war crimes and crimes against<br />

humanity because these relegate past terror to history, a history that belongs to their parents and which<br />

remains disconnected from their own experience in the present.<br />

For the victims’ children, this lack of intergenerational legacy has complex and profound effects. Some<br />

of these can be observed in activities as diverse as public protests organised by HIJOS, an acronym<br />

in Spanish for Sons and Daughters for Identity and Justice Against Oblivion and Silence, consisting<br />

of demonstrations outside perpetrators’ homes or at the restaurants and night clubs frequented by the<br />

perpetrators. <strong>The</strong>y also include works by “<strong>The</strong>atre for Identity”, poems by writers like John Terranova,<br />

films like Los rubios (<strong>The</strong> blond) by Albertina Carri and any film by Alejandro Agresti, all of whom<br />

belong to the generation of those who were children at the time of the 1976 coup or were born during the<br />

dictatorship.<br />

15 For the analysis of patterns of bereavement in addition to the classic work of Freud, “Mourning and Melancholia,” Col-<br />

For the analysis of patterns of bereavement in addition to the classic work of Freud, “Mourning and Melancholia,” Collected<br />

Works, op. cit, pp. 235-256, available on the third volume (“Loss”) of the trilogy of John Bowlby, Attachment and<br />

loss, op. cit, which performs a brilliant analysis of the different types of grief and its relationship to the possible construction<br />

of detachment, and inability to handle the effects of the absence.<br />

85<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Of course, confronting the effects of the three narrative models analyzed with the discursive logic<br />

of another generation involves broadening and deepening our analysis of the different memory and<br />

representation processes of how these are moulded and how they are linked to action.<br />

<strong>The</strong> need felt by the younger generations to demonstrate in public meant a break with the silence and<br />

closure imposed on - or, at least, accepted by - the older generations that lived through the terror. And<br />

these demonstrations began precisely in the years when the perpetrators enjoyed complete impunity and<br />

sought closure in the name of “national reconciliation”. Through their protests, the sons and daughters of<br />

the disappeared signified their refusal to accept this distorted legacy of trauma. With their cry of rebellion,<br />

they sought and continue to seek not only a link with their missing parents but with a missing generation<br />

– one that relinquished its parental roles and responsibilities as lawgivers, authorities, and dispensers of<br />

justice.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se public protests appealed - and still appeal - to the State to exercise its responsibility. One of the<br />

demonstrators’ chants translates roughly as: “No justice? No closure? <strong>The</strong>n public exposure”. <strong>The</strong> failure<br />

of the generation that came through the terror to live up to its responsibilities has led to a revolt against<br />

order and authority among some of the younger generation, exposing a breakdown of intergenerational<br />

bonding in a society when justice is still denied. Although this plea for justice is directed at the State,<br />

it appeals primarily to a whole generation, a generation delegitimized because it failed to exercise its<br />

parental role by seeking justice.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se appeals can also be identified in much of the creative literary and artistic output of the second<br />

generation, which questions or confronts the older generation. Some of these dissident voices are children<br />

of the disappeared; others are simply members of a generation. <strong>The</strong>ir work forms part of a wider focus<br />

on the ways in which society was reorganised by destruction – a focus essential for working through<br />

trauma in both age groups. At the same time, the questions raised by the children could be an opportunity<br />

to demolish their parents’ denial of the past and open the way to the transmission of a legacy. Together<br />

they could give the past a different meaning and cope jointly with the crypt, seeking somehow to raise its<br />

sealed lid.<br />

Both generations need to understand how society and social behaviour have been reorganized by genocide,<br />

even if they approach the question in different ways. And each needs an intergenerational dialogue. Only<br />

by starkly facing pain, shame and guilt is it possible to construct a legacy capable of including the dreams,<br />

successes, problems and concerns of a generation, dreaming of a better world, and how it was marked by<br />

terror and by the consequences of terror. A terror that sought to destroy meaning as they had known it, to<br />

turn their experience into nonsense, to block any possibility of rebellion, and to reorganize the ways of<br />

86


conceptualizing the self and relationships with others, even with loved ones, even with their own children.<br />

One of the key conclusions of this study is that a fundamental objective of “reorganizing genocide” is<br />

desubjectification and desensitization, not only of the direct victims, but of the national group as a whole<br />

together with its complex web of social relationships and practices. As for what to call the violence of the<br />

970s, those who seek definitions need to examine the emotional transference between their own traumas<br />

and their descriptions of historical events. Otherwise, they risk becoming bogged down in abstract<br />

definitions without ever coming to grips with the heart of the matter and how it affects us, our parents and<br />

our children. Different concepts are likely to satisfy our needs in different ways. Being aware of this fact<br />

and acting responsibly is the least we can ask of ourselves and others.<br />

87<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Nepal Searching for Democratic Soul<br />

Narayan Wagle<br />

Author/Journalist<br />

When I was born, Nepal’s first popularly elected leader was still in jail. He had made the king very<br />

nervous, winning two thirds of seats of the parliament. <strong>The</strong> ambitious king couldn’t reconcile the fact<br />

that people’s huge and unprecedented mandate was not with him, but with his subject. <strong>The</strong> popular and<br />

determined prime minister had outlined the country’s political, developmental and social charter along<br />

with independent foreign policy. Just in one and a half years of the country’s first democratic exercise,<br />

the king began his misadventure to derail the process of democracy and development by people’s<br />

representative. Not for a short period as he promised, his misadventure lasted for decades. Nepal remained<br />

under the dark cloud of totalitarian royal regime.<br />

<strong>The</strong> king sacked the government, disbanded the parliament and seized every power of people’s system.<br />

Who cared about the constitution at the time when most of the countries in Asia and elsewhere were<br />

not democratically run? He mobilized the national army to arrest the prime minister, ministers and all<br />

important political leaders and put them in jail. Whoever compromised with him was released, and those<br />

who didn’t remain in jail for years. <strong>The</strong> leader was happy writing literary short stories, novels and letters<br />

to people close to him, rather than bowing down with the military backed king’s coup. He inspired the<br />

country with his ideology of centrist politics and ideas of pro-humane literature even from the heavily<br />

guarded cell.<br />

<strong>The</strong> four walls of the Kathmandu prison, guarded by the national army, now have been turned into a<br />

museum after his name, BP Koirala.<br />

<strong>The</strong> king, ruling from the royal palace, who made the life of Koirala, his followers and the Nepali citizens<br />

in large miserable, has also been turned into a museum now. Koirala Museum is visited by people to<br />

remember and reflect on how he and the peaceful political struggle suffered throughout history. And<br />

88


people visit the royal museum at the centre of downtown Kathmandu to see the kings and queens’<br />

belongings and to get a sense of how they suppressed the people’s aspirations for so long from behind the<br />

most attractive landmark of the capital.<br />

That was the time of the early 1960s. That had been just 10 years of newly found freedom. When most of<br />

the neighboring countries were becoming independent from the British, Nepal was being freed from 100<br />

plus years of family rule. Not of the king’s family, but their kin. In fact, it was a military rule. <strong>The</strong> Rana<br />

family successfully maintained their grip on state affairs, making the monarchy a ceremonial head of state<br />

and ran the country with the military. Nepal had remained independent and safeguarded her sovereignty<br />

even during the fierce wars with the British in the south and with the Tibetans and Chinese in the north.<br />

<strong>The</strong> monarchy didn’t have any power and voice. People who asked for freedom and tried to rally against<br />

the rule were crushed. Some of the brilliant minds who showed their courage to stand up were hung, and<br />

several others were expelled from the country.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was no university. Only one campus, opened basically for Rana and their cronies’ children. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

were a handful of schools. <strong>The</strong>re was one Koirala family among the freedom loving people who were<br />

expelled and compelled to go reside in neighboring Indian towns. <strong>The</strong> senior Koirala had lost all his family<br />

property when he was punished by the rulers. He went into exile almost penniless with all his siblings<br />

and raised them in an atmosphere when Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru were championing for<br />

independence against the British rule. His young son BP connected himself with the Indian uprising for<br />

huge change and famously led a formation of the popular political party Nepali Congress and launched<br />

the first known democratic movement against the Ranas from India.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Ranas lost their best friend, the British in India. During the movement, the then king frustrated from<br />

his limitations inside the palace surprisingly went to take refuge in the Indian embassy and was eventually<br />

flown to New Delhi. <strong>The</strong> new leader in India Jawaharlal Nehru invited the Rana ruler from Kathmandu<br />

to have a trilateral agreement between India, the king and the Ranas. <strong>The</strong> king came back to Kathmandu<br />

with huge fanfare opening the country in a new democratic, free era. He formed an interim cabinet under<br />

the same Rana prime minister and managed to bring BP Koirala and others as ministers. That led to the<br />

ultimate fall of the Rana rule.<br />

Nepal was no longer a forbidden country on the global map. Foreigners were allowed to visit the middle<br />

age type of culture and society. Political parties were officially recognized. <strong>The</strong> country which welcomed<br />

airplanes before cars was slightly changing. <strong>The</strong> Ranas didn’t construct roads to connect to India but<br />

imported some cars. <strong>The</strong> cars were carried by porters in flock along the ups and downs and rivers of<br />

mountains. One flight a day from the closest town of India and the first foreign cars for Ranas symbolized<br />

89<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

the change in Kathmandu as it saw some signs of the progress the outside world made while the country<br />

was asleep.<br />

But the transition never ended. <strong>The</strong> king didn’t fulfill his promises of holding election to Constituent<br />

Assembly. He appointed one prime minister and another to prolong the uncertainty and to consolidate his<br />

own power. Koirala ended up with an understanding of holding parliamentary election ten years down the<br />

line with the new king, Mahendra, after much exhaustion from the political turmoil under the constitution<br />

given by the king. He believed in the king to stabilize the parliamentary political system, participated in<br />

the first general election and got a landslide victory. But the monarchs who were limited inside the palace<br />

for so long weren’t happy at all losing again the power to political leaders. Thus, the king dismissed the<br />

political system he himself declared.<br />

Putting political leaders behind bars, the king imposed a party-less political system, himself becoming<br />

the executive head of the country. Koirala’s Nepali congress launched again a democratic movement<br />

from India which failed to win the confidence of the Indian government, which was facing a border war<br />

with China. India desperately wanted to keep Nepal under her influence in the new context of Chinese<br />

ambition. As Nepal is a sandwich country between the two giants, the king played politics. He made his<br />

own political opposition silent with Indian help and tried to cultivate good relationships with China too.<br />

<strong>The</strong> cold war between two neighbors helped the king survive with his undemocratic regime.<br />

Koirala was released after 8 years but wasn’t allowed to organize people. He was compelled to go into self<br />

exile again in India. He again tried to launch the movement from there, but Nehru’s daughter, Indira, the<br />

Indian prime minister, didn’t tolerate Koirala’s anti-king activities from her country. Realizing the urgency<br />

of consolidating sovereignty of the country and hoping to make the new king, Birendra, change his mind<br />

to open up the political system, he came back to the country with the principle of national reconciliation.<br />

He asked for a multi-party political system where the king could enjoy some power as the head of the<br />

state.<br />

Instead, Koirala was again arrested while coming back to his home country. That time, from Kathmandu<br />

airport, he was taken back to the same prison where he had spent several years before. He was charged<br />

with several cases and the government had pleaded for the punishment of hanging him in a court. Even<br />

from jail he didn’t change his mind for reconciliation with the king for the sake of the country. But the<br />

king had a different approach. He wasn’t ready to democratize power. After all, the power was transferred<br />

to him by his own father, the late king Mahendra. Koirala wasn’t released till some senior royal surgeons<br />

reported to the king that he had got cancer that seriously threatened his life. <strong>The</strong>n he was made free to<br />

travel to the US for treatment.<br />

90


<strong>The</strong> king had different definitions of democracy and foreign policy. Just before Koirala came back from<br />

India, the king had declared Nepal as the Zone of Peace. He wanted to show Nepal, being the birth place<br />

of Gautam Buddha, is a peace zone. He wanted to put a shadow on his hollow political system where<br />

parties were banned and there was no freedom of expression. Down the line in his 14 years of active<br />

monarchy after the declaration, he managed to secure endorsements from over a hundred countries.<br />

Importantly, India never welcomed it.<br />

Koirala’s national reconciliation and the King’s peace of zone declaration didn’t match the reality of the<br />

political climate at the domestic and international fronts. <strong>The</strong> offer of reconciliation was rejected by the<br />

king and his declaration of peace zone propaganda wasn’t accepted by his most influential neighbor. <strong>The</strong><br />

king’s peace declaration ultimately didn’t bear any fruit. Politically conscious students rose to the street in<br />

Kathmandu and elsewhere and compelled the king to declare a national referendum. That was to choose<br />

between multi-party democracy and ‘reformed’ party-less panchayat system.<br />

Koirala and his colleagues got an unprecedented chance to rally around the people all over the country,<br />

igniting the hope of democratic Nepal after a long gap. But the king’s government was all desperate to<br />

defeat the side of multi-party system, thus did every possible tactic manipulating the votes. <strong>The</strong> king<br />

remained in active power for the next decade. Till the backdrop of the falling of the Berlin wall in 1989,<br />

Nepal witnessed another people’s movement succeeding to reinstate a multi-party system after as long as<br />

30 years.<br />

Koirala had died due to the illness, much before the 1990 movement, and the reinstatement of his<br />

envisioned system. But he is still dominates political discourse of Nepali politics. <strong>The</strong> party he founded<br />

is at the center of politics, though the current crop of leaders is much weaker. His photos and political<br />

books are the most used in elections and party meetings. He dominated the politics of modern Nepal and<br />

remained as the main ideological and organizational opposition to the autocratic regimes- first of Ranas<br />

and then Rajas, the kings.<br />

After his death, his party, led by Gandhian Krishna Prasad Bhattarai, launched a Satyagraha movement for<br />

democracy. That was all peaceful sit in which gave huge moral challenge to the king. <strong>The</strong> reconciliation<br />

and satyagraha defined the much popular peaceful political tool against the suppressors. It changed the<br />

very political party which had launched armed struggle, primarily raiding military posts in the past. <strong>The</strong><br />

party was realizing more of the essence, relevance and moral power of peaceful means of opposition.<br />

I grew up in the western hills witnessing the political awareness among teachers and students. <strong>The</strong> district<br />

of Tanahun was influenced by the NC ideals and inspirations. Thanks to the local leaders and the educated<br />

91<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

people who got the chance to have higher education in the famous neighboring Indian city of Benares<br />

where Koirala was based for a long time during his self exile.<br />

I saw young leaders of the party visiting secretly our villages and talking to common people. <strong>The</strong>y hid<br />

themselves from government agencies and used to avoid meeting possible government spies. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

used to explain to the innocent villagers how the king’s system was running the country without any<br />

accountability and ruining the future of children. Development of the countryside was hugely neglected<br />

and schools and health posts were too far to reach to get services. <strong>The</strong> government was fearful of teachers<br />

since they were the ones who were the most literate and could easily become connected to the opposition’s<br />

political ideas.<br />

Teachers had noble ideas of social awakening. I remember my teachers at our high school privately<br />

reminding me and my classmates how we could contribute to society by doing social service and for<br />

that we needed to acquire some political beliefs. Whether democratic politics or politics of communists,<br />

we had to believe in any political line to be better students. That was the message. A student with clear<br />

political belief and commitment could be a good citizen in the future. Being under the huge influence of<br />

democratic front leaders of the banned party, we were ready to make any sacrifice for the country.<br />

But the restrictions were so heavy that if found involved in any political activities police posts used to<br />

keep record. For government jobs, candidates had to provide clearance from police. Thus, the possibility<br />

of being active in politics was to end the probability of the only available job opportunity. <strong>The</strong> private<br />

sector almost didn’t exist. Not only was political power centralized, the economy was also government<br />

controlled. <strong>The</strong> license system was strict. But teachers suggested that we grow with political conviction<br />

and work for a greater human cause.<br />

<strong>The</strong> people working for the government and the local bodies, the conservative class, was the support<br />

base of the king’s system. Families largely from ethnic communities dreamed of sending their sons to<br />

the national army, if they couldn’t get selected in the British or Indian army. We still have the old treaty<br />

of allowing our youths to get recruited in these two foreign armies. Others preferred government jobs,<br />

including teaching. For every opportunity, one needed good connections and favor. People who were close<br />

to the establishment used to get an easy chance. <strong>The</strong> local cronies of the system used to terrorize people<br />

for having independent minds.<br />

I remember pro-government local powerful man asking my father how I was growing up. If I was<br />

brewing some political ideas then I had no chance in the future to get job opportunities. On the one hand,<br />

the teachers who were our heroes used to promote us with political ideas and on the other hand there was<br />

92


terror back in homes. That was a black and white kind of situation. <strong>The</strong> prohibited political parties were<br />

relying on the students and teachers for their own existence. Student organizations close to the parties<br />

became active. <strong>The</strong>y launched a student movement from Kathmandu.<br />

Nepali students were marching towards the Pakistani embassy in Kathmandu to protest against the<br />

hanging of democratic leader Julfikar Ali Bhutto. <strong>The</strong> government mobilized police to crush the peaceful<br />

demonstration. That ignited the student leaders across political lines and the movement kicked off. It<br />

wasn’t limited inside the capital valley. <strong>The</strong> fire was spread everywhere. <strong>The</strong> initial days of 1980 were<br />

very different, but the courage shown by the youths made the king compromise with political leaders,<br />

especially Koirala, to hold a national referendum to choose between a party-less or multi-party political<br />

system. Surprisingly, the king’s choice of system won, though with narrow margin.<br />

Nepal is one of the most diversified countries, not only in geographical terms. Yes, in geographical terms it<br />

expands from the highest point of the world, Mt Everest and eight of the 14 tallest mountains above eight<br />

thousand meters, down south to the plains of Lumbini, the birth place of Gautam Buddha. In this different<br />

geographic and climate zones, many different ethnic communities have resided for centuries. More than<br />

one hundred ethnic groups exist and several different languages are spoken. <strong>The</strong> hills and mountain sides<br />

have always remained as remote areas, and the people are neglected by the state.<br />

Hindu is the vastly dominant religion. <strong>The</strong> kings modeled themselves as the latest incarnation of one<br />

popular Hindu god. <strong>The</strong>y always religiously followed the rituals strictly and promoted the religion.<br />

Hence, they ignited god fearing people along with their non political state of affairs. <strong>The</strong>y found it easy to<br />

consolidate their power on the religious line. On the other hand, Koirala was also a Hindu. But he wasn’t<br />

religious minded. He was very secular in his approach and lifestyle. But the fear factor in society was so<br />

prevalent that it was thought democracy was anti-Hindu.<br />

Another main source of the king’s power came from the national army. <strong>The</strong> army’s top brass were always<br />

selected from the royal family directly. <strong>The</strong> palace relatives were always promoted as the chief of the<br />

defense force. That was totally a monolithic organization. <strong>The</strong> state resources were monopolized. And<br />

the king played a foreign card. Being an active member of the Non Aligned Movement and the United<br />

Nations, sending army to Peace keeping postings elsewhere, the king managed somehow to manage the<br />

country’s independence. More than that, he had a good rapport with China to control influence from India.<br />

China looked for stability in her southern neighborhood, which borders the sensitive area of Tibet. On the<br />

other hand, the king used to give signals to India. If she pushed for democracy, he would become further<br />

closed to Beijing. He used to pick one man as the prime minister close to India at a time to show his<br />

confidence in New Delhi and another time used to change his man at the government who was believed to<br />

93<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

not be so close to India. That was the card and bargain he was a champion for.<br />

<strong>The</strong> idea of the Hindu kingdom was promoted just to check the possibility of the rise of democratic<br />

demands. Democracy in the real sense could be secular. Because of the feudal system, people were poorly<br />

informed. Many new opposition leaders were jailed and some were hung.<br />

Any voice of democracy was targeted and blamed as foreign influence. <strong>The</strong> system had promoted a<br />

discourse of nationalism in their best capacity to manipulate the definition. Educational text books were<br />

rewritten. All the king’s men were the greatest propagandists. <strong>The</strong> government radio used their voices<br />

every day. <strong>The</strong> king meant for the country and anything against the system was anti-national. <strong>The</strong> idea of<br />

multi-party system was anti-national.<br />

Nepal has huge potential for hydro power exploration, from her huge rivers flowing down from the<br />

Himalayas. Still, it hasn’t been realized. We are still suffering from huge electric power outages, especially<br />

during winter, thanks to the political uncertainty. <strong>The</strong> king further made the nationalists so panicked that<br />

the water treaties in the past during the brief stint of democratic government were intentioned to sell out<br />

the rivers to India. We saw the wall paintings everywhere by the government blaming the banned political<br />

party as so anti-national that they sold out the rivers. <strong>The</strong> top leaders were either in jail or exile and had<br />

hard time coming up with convincing explanations. If they said anything there was no credible and<br />

influential media to make their versions public. <strong>The</strong> dark shadow of narrow nationalism of the king’s time<br />

is still hanging around. If the narrow mindset becomes a state policy once, it will have a long term impact<br />

in a nation’s life. Nepal is one great example.<br />

I came to Kathmandu for higher studies, leaving my village still terrorized by the dominant state policies<br />

discouraging freedom seeking students and teachers. Television was just introduced by the information<br />

ministry. But the government couldn’t stop international news airing. <strong>The</strong> Berlin Wall fell down. We saw<br />

the victorious Germans on screens. <strong>The</strong> banned political parties were organized under an inspirational<br />

leadership of one closest aid of the late Koirala. He appealed for democracy. His centrist party had<br />

managed to be united with leftist parties in the fight against autocratic monarchy. He famously said that he<br />

fought against the Ranas and three Rajas[kings] in his long life and that was the final moment to stand up<br />

and rise for freedom.<br />

People came to the streets in such numbers that it became another national people’s movement, toppling<br />

down the autocracy in a few weeks time. <strong>The</strong> king tried to crush the peaceful demonstrations and several<br />

innocent people died by police bullets. That fueled the movement. And it became more impressive. <strong>The</strong><br />

king finally agreed to listen to the parties. <strong>The</strong> multi-party political system was reinstated after 30 years.<br />

94


<strong>The</strong> interim government paved way democratic exercise, bringing out constitution and holding general<br />

elections. NC again came back to power with impressive majority in the parliament. <strong>The</strong> economy was<br />

liberalized. Constitutional guarantees had paved the way for private sector media. Government services<br />

were provided equally for everyone. People now had easy access to make passports and travel abroad.<br />

But the leaders, being new to state affairs, were busy wrangling in unnecessary internal power tussles.<br />

One left party was the main opposition, and they too were very new to open politics. <strong>The</strong> royal palace<br />

wasn’t happy at all with the new development because they had to give up power. But the new system<br />

still had given a very dignified role to the king as the constitutional head of the country. <strong>The</strong> king was<br />

still the supreme commander chief of the army. <strong>The</strong> army wasn’t under government control. <strong>The</strong> king<br />

tried to show his displeasure and the democratically elected governments subsequently couldn’t win the<br />

confidence of the army.<br />

As the elected government wasn’t delivering much and the hugely exaggerated people’s expectations<br />

weren’t being met. <strong>The</strong> economic opportunities were very limited. General people got desperate for rapid<br />

changes in their lives. So the youths flew to Korea, Malaysia and gulf countries. In the past, the open<br />

border with India was the only option for the Nepalese to go to a greater job market. Now the options<br />

were multiple. Now Kathmandu is a great hub, especially for gulf airlines, flying everyday thousands of<br />

low paid job seeker youths.<br />

I became a journalist in the newly found free press environment. My motivation was to write stories<br />

of general people and how their lives were changed or not changed at all. I witnessed the opposition’s<br />

political activities since the early days of my schooling, participated in student movements during school<br />

hours and later the national people’s movement during my college days in Kathmandu. I wanted to write<br />

about the common people who dreamt for a better future. And as a reporter I wanted to talk to them and<br />

check out the facts with the authorities. In fact, I wanted to be a university professor or a full time writer,<br />

but as soon as I got the chance to work in a newsroom I felt that it was what suited me best.<br />

<strong>The</strong> democratic practice was just about to come into place after the second general election when the<br />

Maoists party surprisingly launched their typical 20 th century armed struggle against the political system.<br />

In the name of establishing communism in the country, they first targeted the feudal structure of society.<br />

Initially, they were active in some remote hill district, cleansing all opponent political voices. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

came out with much populist and propagandist programs of social reforms. <strong>The</strong>y lacked a credible and<br />

pragmatic political ideology to suit present day reality domestically and internationally. <strong>The</strong>y called<br />

themselves the messiah of the poor, marginalized and suppressed classes and communities. <strong>The</strong>ir method<br />

was very violent. <strong>The</strong>y raided police posts, seized arms and grew to such a powerful scale that they were<br />

95<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

powerful enough to attack army barracks and take away sophisticated modern weapons.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y created fear. <strong>The</strong> fear factor was so rampant that other people believing in other political ideologies<br />

were targeted and eliminated. Fear is the worst form of human activity. I had sensed the same kind<br />

of atmosphere when I was a child during the king’s days, and it was now, again, a very similar or<br />

worse situation everywhere. <strong>The</strong> Maoists were strategically smart. <strong>The</strong>y mobilized the marginalized<br />

communities, gave loud slogans in favor of them. <strong>The</strong>ir aspirations weren’t responded to even by the<br />

democratic system. <strong>The</strong> system was still structured in a way that many ethnic communities weren’t<br />

fairly represented in state organs. Some dominant social groups continued getting privileges even in the<br />

democratic era.<br />

From my newsroom, I saw the democratic system at the center slowly becoming helpless to tackle the<br />

Maoists. <strong>The</strong> youngest brother of the late Koirala was the prime minister. He was hated by the Maoists<br />

and the royalists as well. <strong>The</strong> king didn’t agree with him mobilizing the national army against the Maoists.<br />

<strong>The</strong> rebels were attacking army barracks and district headquarters and the government was becoming<br />

helpless.<br />

That was the time when the crown prince killed everyone from his family including the king and the<br />

queen in the infamous palace massacre. He had lost his balance while not getting a chance to get married<br />

with his beloved. <strong>The</strong> younger brother of the late king was made the king. <strong>The</strong> new king happened to be<br />

more ambitious, who wasn’t reconciling the fact that the monarchy had limited power after the change of<br />

1990. He made the prime minister resign. Another prime minister from the same party NC was in place,<br />

but the king made the new PM agree to dissolve the parliament. <strong>The</strong> election was out of sight due to the<br />

security situation. <strong>The</strong> king benefitted and later he sacked the PM to take full executive authority himself<br />

and fully mobilized the army.<br />

When my first novel Palpasa Café was published in 2005, the war at home was coming to a climax.<br />

On average, 8 to 10 people were getting killed every day. <strong>The</strong> country was totally in the dark as to how<br />

to move ahead. People were frustrated, political parties were becoming more and more helpless and<br />

hopeless.<br />

<strong>The</strong> constitutional monarch had become the country’s executive head, taking power unconstitutionally.<br />

<strong>The</strong> king’s major power was coming from the national army, which was fighting against the Maoist<br />

militants. A typical 20 th century ‘People’s War’ waged by some ambitious Nepali communists was<br />

dragging the peaceful Himalayan kingdom into much deeper conflict.<br />

96


My novel was basically a simple human story exposing the war and how it was destroying the social<br />

fabric of the country. It was well received by critics and general readers in the sense that it was branded<br />

as an anti-war book, and it became an instant hit. It ultimately became an all-time best seller inside<br />

Nepal. My observation of the readers is that the story evoked the inner feeling, which was deep inside the<br />

sufferers of the war.<br />

As a journalist, I couldn’t capture the full story from human psychology. In our newspaper, most of the<br />

time, headlines used to be casualties. We counted the numbers of deaths. Everyday there were attacks<br />

and counter-attacks. Though we tried hard to get human stories in our news space, it had limitations. Out<br />

of that feeling, I wrote the novel. Both warring sides weren’t happy at all with the story. It was going to<br />

expose the war which they desperately wanted to cover up.<br />

For a writer, human is the major subject. Suffering is the main story. You would have different narratives,<br />

different characters, different context and different perspectives. But the soul is the human, and the human<br />

suffers. Similarly, wars might be different from one place to another, from one context to another. Every<br />

war has impacts on human lives. Unbearable impacts are expressed in different forms. Basically, the forms<br />

close to art, like literature, has so much relation with the impacts.<br />

Artists and writers tend to bring the extreme sides closer. <strong>The</strong>y are pro human. This is their character. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

want to celebrate human lives. But the extremists always ask for human sacrifices. This is the conflict.<br />

Writers are on one side and extremists on another side. Writers heal the human, extremists haunt.<br />

This is exactly what happened in our country. <strong>The</strong> extreme lefts, the armed radicals were at one extreme<br />

end, and the king with the army was at opposite extreme side. <strong>The</strong> intellectuals, writers, journalists,<br />

lawyers, doctors and teachers came together to give pressure naturally in a peaceful way. <strong>The</strong>y provoked<br />

the pro-peace parliamentary parties to launch a peaceful movement. This did, but their voice wasn’t heard<br />

by the king.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Maoists changed their strategy and reached out to the political parties. <strong>The</strong> parties were in favor of<br />

constitutional monarchy, changed their stance and agreed to remove the monarchy. After the agreement,<br />

they called for the people’s movement. Kathmandu showed the world how a peaceful protest movement<br />

could change a war-torn country into a political settlement.<br />

Here comes another question in today’s complex realities.<br />

Removing the monarchy wasn’t that difficult. It was a question of one decisive people’s movement. <strong>The</strong><br />

97<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

question was black and white. Whether to have a monarchy or not?<br />

<strong>The</strong> question of building an enduring peace has many angles at which it can be looked at. Democracy is<br />

the source of long lasting peace in a country. But democracy isn’t a word. It is an interpretation. We in<br />

Nepal spent four years of Constituent Assembly defining democracy and failed.<br />

Initially, it was a question of the name of democracy. Whether real democracy, people’s democracy or full<br />

democracy? Every political force had a different choice, emotion, text and orientation. We defined to have<br />

inclusive democracy. It intended to lead to federal democracy.<br />

<strong>The</strong> electoral system changed. A mixed representative system was adopted. Candidates had to be<br />

proportional in terms of gender, ethnicity etc. <strong>The</strong> Constituent Assembly and the legislative parliament<br />

became one solid inclusive institution for the first time. It was more inclusive than any of south Asian<br />

country. <strong>The</strong> members took oath in their mother tongues. <strong>The</strong> oath taking ceremony was so colorful that<br />

every member was in different attire, was so musical that every member had different sounds to make.<br />

Nepal celebrated her unique diversity.<br />

But the process didn’t bear any results. <strong>The</strong> house couldn’t deliver on the constitution. One major reason<br />

was the inability of political parties to define federal democracy. Nepal seems a rather small country<br />

on the globe. Why? It is between the giants- India in the south and China in the north. But population-<br />

wise, Nepal is the 40 th largest country. So the issues of lasting peace and democracy are still a question of<br />

political settlement.<br />

<strong>The</strong> new constitution was mandated to settle all political issues. But the tenure of the house expired. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

is no future election fixed. A coalition caretaker government is ruling the country. <strong>The</strong> differences among<br />

political parties are bound to widen.<br />

Though the armed conflict has concluded, the problems of one of the world’s poorest countries are to<br />

grow more in the vacuum. <strong>The</strong> transition is going to linger.<br />

Meanwhile, I published my second novel, Mayur Times, with a story of how the law and order situation<br />

has weakened and politicization of crime and criminalization of politics has taken root deeply in society.<br />

Nepal is over war, but the post-war situation doesn’t mean that it is good peace time.<br />

<strong>The</strong> country has come back to almost the same situation of being governed by unelected people. Nepal<br />

98


is probably one of the few countries that have held elections very few times. Now the ruling alliance is<br />

adamant to pave way for consensus election government, and the opposition parties aren’t going to satisfy<br />

themselves till there is a new caretaker government. Equally importantly, the local bodies haven’t been<br />

elected for the last 16 years.<br />

Meanwhile, the parties are becoming fragmented. <strong>The</strong> Maoist party has split, and the new Maoist party<br />

is threatening to launch another armed struggle. And the leftist party is waiting for another break up. <strong>The</strong><br />

ethnic community leaders in the party are preparing to form another party. <strong>The</strong> question of the basis of<br />

dividing provinces would be more critical down the line.<br />

India in the south is in favor of one or two provinces in the bordering area of Nepal so that they could have<br />

more strategic power over Kathmandu. Similarly in the north, China has given messages that the future<br />

provinces in Nepal shouldn’t be demarcated along ethnic lines. <strong>The</strong>ir logic is if demarcated ethnically that<br />

would certainly impact the bordering of Tibet.<br />

Both giant neighbors have been aggressive in recent years thanks to their economic success. <strong>The</strong>y have<br />

been more demanding. Both of them ask for political stability in Kathmandu for their own interests. Nepal<br />

is struggling with just three to four percent economic growth. <strong>The</strong> trade balance with both of the neighbors<br />

is widening. Due to its own domestic reasons, Nepal hasn’t been able to attract investment. Youths are<br />

fleeing from the country. Villages have been left by the youths where only elderly people, women and<br />

children take care of the families.<br />

In the last 60 years of modern time, Nepal hasn’t managed to stabilize its own political system. <strong>The</strong><br />

four subsequent kings after then have interfered in the day to day politics. Political parties have failed<br />

in a number of occasions to prove their commitments and to deliver. <strong>The</strong> country heavily depends upon<br />

foreign aid for development expenditure. <strong>The</strong> government isn’t allowed to bring out a yearly budget. Due<br />

to the opposition’s pressure, it came out with a three month expenditure program. Thus, it has further<br />

halted economic activities.<br />

Nepal has always been looking for political settlement. Uncertainty and undemocratic atmosphere has<br />

always ruled. People haven’t been given the dignity to vote their representative in a free and fair way.<br />

Nepal has yet to value the core democratic human rights of its citizen. Election and periodic election is a<br />

must for any democracy and stability. We have been unfortunate enough in this basic aspect of modern<br />

civilization. Without accountability, the sense of democratic and transparent governance is nil. It has been<br />

very true in our case. Corruption in every sphere of life has made common man and woman frustrated.<br />

And there is no justice if there is no rule active.<br />

99<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

When I reflect, I see Nepal has spared most of its huge opportunities in the past. And it is so even in<br />

the present. We have changed the constitution six times and still haven’t managed to draft a new one.<br />

Thousands of people have been killed in this long political fight in different times in the last six decades,<br />

and many have lost their properties. Many have been displaced. We are yet to come to terms.<br />

Parties could go to any extreme side. Any organization could launch any type of struggle. <strong>The</strong> Maoists or<br />

any type of extremist force could go underground again.<br />

<strong>The</strong> basic dignity of a free citizen is still a far cry. That is freedom from fear. Political stability, democratic<br />

structure, fair representation and periodic election can ensure freedom. In our case, fear factor has ruled<br />

the dictum. We aren’t free from the fear.<br />

In Search of Reconciliation<br />

Nepal is in peace time since the Maoist rebels came to agree on participating in open competitive politics.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y surrendered weapons. <strong>The</strong>ir fighters are finally being integrated into the national army after five<br />

years of comprehensive peace treaty with the government. <strong>The</strong> table has been turned. <strong>The</strong>y became the<br />

largest party in the last constituent assembly- parliament and the coalition government is led by a Maoist<br />

leader. But the fear isn’t over from people’s mind. <strong>The</strong> Maoist party is divided, and a breakaway group of<br />

the party is threatening to rise to arms again. <strong>The</strong>y seem determined to regroup the old fighters for a new<br />

unknown fight. <strong>The</strong>y have started campaigning against the ruling coalition with much nationalist plank.<br />

We don’t have a solid peace culture. <strong>The</strong>re is always history of political conflict. <strong>The</strong>re is no coalition<br />

culture in the political party level. Whereas the interim constitution was promulgated aiming for<br />

harnessing consensus politics. Political parties naturally compete with each other; thus, consensus culture<br />

is a far away cry in our context, more and more along the way of transition politics. Consensus politics<br />

is for promoting culture of working together and develop a sense of co-existence. But from the political<br />

spectrum, from far left to extreme right, it has been a herculean task. Nepal urgently needed at least a<br />

coalition political culture to respect the diverse ethnic and regional social composition. <strong>The</strong> election<br />

system of mixed propositional, which doesn’t easily allow a single party to get majority, is for that culture.<br />

During a decade long Maoists war, more than 16 thousand people lost their lives from both warring sides-<br />

the state security forces and the rebels. <strong>The</strong> peace treaty promised to set up a truth and reconciliation<br />

commission to examine the war crimes and give justice to the victims. But the parties are still failing to<br />

constitute the commission and the families of victims are still crying for justice. <strong>The</strong> excesses of power<br />

and brutality are supposed to be examined and the culprits be punished. But the poor families are helpless<br />

100


in the context of political division of constituting the commission. <strong>The</strong> party in power now obviously<br />

doesn’t want to come forward for it, with universally accepted norms of a truth finding mission. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

would like to give blanket amnesty as the other parties who were in power in the past during war also<br />

would like to avoid any situation where they themselves are exposed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> consecutive governments formed different commissions to look after the human right violations<br />

during the peoples’ movement in 1990 and 2005 after much pressure from people. <strong>The</strong> commission<br />

reports were never publicized, and the actions were never taken against the violators. This tendency of<br />

power has always undermined the demand of justice and has made the victim families suffer more. So the<br />

general sense in the country is war time crimes are never investigated and the victims never get justice.<br />

It has further spread the fear that truth would never come out and reconciliation happen. Reconciliation<br />

is a major moral force to accept the political change and make the change lasting. Thus, the country has<br />

been facing the acute crisis of political stability. Stability first comes from the minds of citizen. If they feel<br />

cheated and get frustrated, there is always possibility of another surge.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fear doesn’t come from weapons. Moreover, it is from peoples’ mind. When war crimes aren’t<br />

investigated, human right violations aren’t examined and the culprits aren’t brought to justice, fear<br />

always dominates innocent people. <strong>The</strong> people whose property and land were occupied and seized during<br />

the war are still asking for return. <strong>The</strong> new powerful lot which captured others’ land and property are<br />

threatening the victims in return. So the war is over but the new fear of another war by another outfit is<br />

there and peace isn’t in the air. During the attempt to draft a constitution for four unsuccessful years, the<br />

expectations of many minority groups were heightened by different political forces. Since the constitution<br />

couldn’t be drafted due to sharp polarized political division, the groups are in the process of new political<br />

alignment. So the politics would be further polarized in the future, which will ultimately prolong the<br />

transition. Transition of interim constitution and caretaker government might continue and there would be<br />

no elections in the near future.<br />

<strong>The</strong> only positive aspect of Nepali society is that the people are liberal, they have a great quality of<br />

forgiveness and they cherish the harmony among the diverse composition of ethnic groups. So there is no<br />

sudden outburst against past atrocities. <strong>The</strong> economic capacity of the country hasn’t been expanded. Job<br />

opportunities are very limited. Thousands of youths flee to the gulf everyday for cheap labor jobs. <strong>The</strong><br />

villages have been left to the elderly and the children. After the Maoists’ war began, the speed of youths<br />

leaving villages has increased dramatically. More people are coming to cities. So the poor villages, where<br />

most of the insurgent activities were concentrated, have changed- one visible change is most of them don’t<br />

have enough youths to show the vibrancy of the communities.<br />

101<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Time is another great healer. Though, nobody forgets the harsh suffering. <strong>The</strong> atrocities against someone<br />

in particular can hardly be forgiven and forgotten. For that, a civilized state should play a role. Healing<br />

the great sufferings of common citizens is possible only when there is a just democratic political system.<br />

<strong>The</strong> system is bound to ensure people the justice they deserve. Justice is for the dignity of citizens. Any<br />

democratic system would embrace people with dignity. Dignity is the very right of every citizen.<br />

<strong>The</strong> parties haven’t helped people to overcome the past sufferings, and they haven’t done enough to<br />

help people overcome fear. Fear is the main enemy of any citizen’s dignity. Fear is the worst enemy<br />

if it is coming from the inability of political parties to perform their roles. But at least the parties are<br />

in negotiating terms and the continuous dialogue among them is giving hope to people for a positive<br />

direction towards stability.<br />

<strong>The</strong> resilience of Nepali people is a great asset. <strong>The</strong>re isn’t a single incident of people taking revenge<br />

of any past crimes against them during conflicts, even after knowing who were involved. But still, for<br />

a greater cause of having lasting peace and stability and to help people overcome fear of human right<br />

violations, atrocities and the power excesses should be brought to justice. <strong>The</strong> truth finding and helping<br />

reconciliation is very vital to give justice. Peace doesn’t come from state power, rather it comes from<br />

people’s mind.<br />

For the last 60 years of modern Nepal’s tumultuous political history, the political conflicts have made<br />

many people suffer. It is very ironic for a modern nation not to give justice to the people investigating<br />

crimes during conflicts. Thus, it hasn’t helped establish a lasting political system based on justice and<br />

helped people overcome fear.<br />

Both of my novels were based on the conflict, and the characters of the novels were taken realistically<br />

from society. I see the people resembling my characters and still not getting a sense of justice. That way I<br />

also feel helpless. But the writings and art creations on the issue for years have been one effective medium<br />

for general people remind the sufferings of others and relate to themselves. Currently, I am writing a third<br />

novel. This time as well, I haven’t overcome the historic hangover of the conflicts. This is also going to<br />

be another novel based on the conflicts. <strong>The</strong> stories are there. <strong>The</strong>y have attracted writers’ attention more<br />

because the sufferers haven’t received justice.<br />

102


Clinical Healing or Pathological Reflection: the Imagination that<br />

Links Auschwitz with Fukushima<br />

Kyung Sik Suh<br />

Tokyo Keizai University<br />

1. Introduction: the problem of this article<br />

<strong>The</strong> ‘impossibility of representation of Auschwitz’ or the ‘impossibility of testimony’ has been recurring<br />

themes that have been debated since the 1990s. <strong>The</strong> main problem I would like to address through this<br />

article is to expand this debate, which has been fixed in a certain time-space of Auschwitz and in the early<br />

20th century. I would like to bring these themes and debates to “here and now” for reflection. In other<br />

words, I would like to examine how to translate concepts such as ‘impossibility of representation’ and<br />

‘impossibility of testimony’ into universal terms to reflect on our current modern society and its people. I<br />

would also like to explore whether such reflections could be considered ethically sound.<br />

On 11 March 2011, the great Tohoku earthquake hit the eastern shores of Japan, which led to a “severe<br />

accident” at the first nuclear power plant in Fukushima. In late 20 , the Japanese government announced<br />

the ‘settlement’ of the incident with the ‘cold shutdown’ of the nuclear reactor. However, I do not have to<br />

mention that this was not a truthful statement that reflected the real state of the incident.<br />

Facing the ‘Fukushima’ incident, I began to reflect on problems of whether it would be possible to<br />

represent and testify on this case, and whether such testimonies would be accepted. You could say such<br />

inquiries were an attempt to examine the problem of the ‘impossibility of testimonies’ and link Auschwitz<br />

with Fukushima. If Auschwitz’s ‘impossibility of testimonies’ has caused the revival and continuation of<br />

the crisis, we could make an identical case for Fukushima in the future. If there are no testimony or if the<br />

testimonies could not be heard, Fukushima might as well continue to be resuscitated again and again in<br />

the future. <strong>The</strong>re have recently been several symptoms indicating materialization of such fear.<br />

103<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

2. Powerful of the earth, masters of new poisons<br />

I have twice visited the disaster site of Fukushima nuclear power in June and November 2011. <strong>The</strong>se visits<br />

have led to an unexpected realization that the incident has “challenged our imagination.”<br />

Following my visit to Fukushima in November, I gave a lecture titled ‘<strong>The</strong> Witness of Isolation: Primo<br />

Levi’ at the International Peace Museum of Ritsumeikan University at Kyoto. And I met a poem through<br />

the occasion.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Girl-Child of Pompei<br />

Since everyone’s anguish is our own,<br />

We live ours over again, thin child,<br />

Clutching your mother convulsively<br />

As though, when the noon sky turned black,<br />

You wanted to re-enter her.<br />

To no avail, because the air, turned poison,<br />

Filtered to find you through the closed windows<br />

Of your quiet, thick-walled house,<br />

Once happy with your song, your timid laugh.<br />

Centuries have passed, the ash has petrified<br />

To imprison those delicated limbs forever.<br />

In this way you stay with us, a twisted plaster cast,<br />

Agony without end, terrible witness to how much<br />

Our proud seed matters to the gods.<br />

Nothing is left of your far-removed sister,<br />

<strong>The</strong> Dutch girl imprisoned by four walls<br />

Who wrote of her youth without tomorrows.<br />

Her silent ash was scattered by the wind,<br />

Her brief life shut in a crumpled notebook.<br />

Nothing remains of the Hiroshima schoolgirl,<br />

A shadow printed on a wall by the light of a thousand suns,<br />

Victim sacrificed on the altar of fear.<br />

Powerful of the earth, masters of new poisons,<br />

Sad secret guardians of final thunder,<br />

<strong>The</strong> torments heaven sends us are enough.<br />

104


Before your finger presses down, stop and consider.<br />

20 November 1978<br />

Was this a poem that sang of Fukushima? Primo Levi had passed away 25 years ago and the ‘Dutch girl’<br />

referred to in this poem is Anne Frank. <strong>The</strong> last four verses of the poem refer indeed to nuclear weapons,<br />

but, to me, they seem to sing about Fukushima. Levi’s imagination seems to linger on even after his<br />

death providing perspectives to events such as Fukushima. His imagination goes beyond the time-space<br />

dimension to link victims of ancient volcano bursts, victims of the Holocaust and victims of the nuclear<br />

weapons bombing. It is a sorrowful imagination indeed.<br />

Primo Levi was an Italian Jew and a survivor of the Nazi concentration camps. He wrote a record on<br />

his experience in the camps titled If this is Man, which has been translated and known to the Japanese<br />

population as Auschwitz is not over yet. Despite recognition as one of Italy’s prominent writers of the post<br />

war period who sublimated his testimony into literature, Levi ended his life by committing suicide at his<br />

home’s staircase in 1987.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is a description inside If this is Man of the daily nightmares Levi had in the camps. <strong>The</strong> dream is<br />

about Levi’s family’s neglect of his struggles when he tells them about it after being released. His sister<br />

even sneaks away to the next room in Levi’s dream. In a collection of essays he published called <strong>The</strong><br />

Drowned and the Saved just a year before his death and forty years after his time at the camp, there are<br />

hints of tiredness for not being able to rightly convey his experience despite all his testimonies.<br />

Primo Levi was not just a witness of what actually happened at Auschwitz. He was also a witness to how<br />

difficult it was to testify to such history, how difficult it was to convey such experience and to eventually<br />

the ‘impossibility of testimony’ itself.<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> Tohoku earthquake and the minorities<br />

<strong>The</strong> first thought that occurred in my mind at the time that I heard of the Tohoku earthquake of March<br />

2011 was ‘whether the Korean-Japanese and other foreigners in Japan were okay.’ I was afraid not only<br />

of the damages from the earthquake and tsunami, but also worried about violence from demagogies<br />

that followed massive disasters. Amongst the confusion, the Asahi Newspapers published reports with<br />

the headlines such as ‘Foreigner <strong>The</strong>fts’, ‘Riot Takes Place’, ‘Endless Rumours, not to be trusted’ on 26<br />

March that expanded on the rumours.<br />

105<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Reading these reports, I began to fear attacks against minorities due to such ‘groundless rumours.’ <strong>The</strong><br />

reason I harboured such fears is due to an event in history of 90 years ago in Japan.<br />

On 1 September 1923 (Taisho 12), a magnitude 7.9 massive earthquake struck the Kanto region of Japan.<br />

It was the Great Kanto earthquake, which resulted in over 100 thousand deaths and missing people. It is<br />

estimated that some 6,000 Koreans and over 200 Chinese were killed along with tens of Japanese due<br />

to the event. But following the quake’s strike, rumours spread of ‘Koreans setting fire to houses’ and<br />

‘poisoning wells’ which led to attacks against Koreans by the Japanese. <strong>The</strong> army and police formed<br />

vigilante corps consisting of youth and fire-fighter groups. <strong>The</strong> members of the vigilante groups attacked<br />

Koreans with Japanese swords, fire hooks and bamboo spears. Since the Japanese defeat of the war in 5<br />

August 945, there has been no action taken by the Japanese government to find the truth, apologize or<br />

compensate for such event.<br />

In 2010, there were 2,134,151 foreigners registered residing in Japan. <strong>The</strong> largest group of foreigners<br />

residing in Japan are Chinese, being 687,156. <strong>The</strong> next largest group are Koreans/Chosun with 565,989<br />

and the third largest are Brazilians with 230,552. During the colonial era (before the end of the war in<br />

945), Koreans worked in coal mines or in 3D (Difficult, Dirty and Dangerous) factories near cities. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

are many mines near Fukushima and Ibaraki, and therefore there are many Korean-Japanese still living in<br />

these regions today.<br />

<strong>The</strong> youth have been leaving the rural farming and fishing villages of Japan resulting in a sharp decrease<br />

in their population. <strong>The</strong> villages can no longer sustain their businesses due to the lack of workers. To solve<br />

such problem, Japan has begun to receive foreign labourers, which they refer to as trainees. However,<br />

because of their status as ‘trainees’ they receive a very low salary and there have been problems of human<br />

rights violations in their work environment.<br />

On 11 June, a man working in a dairy farm committed suicide in Soma city, Fukushima prefecture. It was<br />

after a month of throwing away milk that had been contaminated by the radioactive materials from the<br />

nuclear power plant disaster nearby. He confronted a situation where he had to sell some 40 cows due to<br />

a lack of income and mounting debt. He wrote his final words with chalk on the walls of the stable that<br />

was built from a loan, saying ‘if only there was no nuclear power plant.’ If you read the newspaper article<br />

on this incident closely, you will be able to find out that the wife of this dairy farmer was a Filipino. In<br />

an article (‘Parched lands and the ties of a foreign wife’ 25 July 2011, Asahi Newspaper) that follows the<br />

initial report, it is reported as follows: “<strong>The</strong> wife, age 33, is left alone in the isolated farm in the mountains<br />

where there isn’t even mobile phone coverage. She will have to now take care of her two children, a first<br />

grader and a pre-schooler, by herself. Not knowing proper Japanese, she is worried and sad that she must<br />

106


ely on her neighbours to carry out the legal procedures related to her husband’s death.” How painful<br />

it must be for this woman, who has lost her husband and is left in a place where she has difficulty with<br />

communication and where she does not know the social system.<br />

I am worried that the foreigners residing in the disaster areas like the Filipino wife of the dairy farmer<br />

who are indeed members of Japanese society, may once again be abandoned because compensation<br />

and restoration programmes like ‘Japan’s restoration’ and ‘Endeavour Japan’ are carried out based on a<br />

nationalistic logic.<br />

Respect of others and equal treatment is necessary to build a society that live with and accept others<br />

including foreigners. However, Japan has not granted proper status to others that live in its society and<br />

even the Korean-Japanese that have lived in Japan since the colonial era. Hence, I believe it is a bit<br />

shameless for the Japanese to now start requesting more foreign workers to be allowed to come to Japan<br />

because of their current lack of labour.<br />

As mentioned above, the minorities are likely to be victims and their voices are unlikely to be heard in<br />

times of major disasters, wars and severe events. I believe this to be a problem of not the minorities but a<br />

problem of the imagination of the majorities. <strong>The</strong>y lack the imagination to empathize with the pain of the<br />

minorities.<br />

4. <strong>The</strong> ‘impossibility’ of representation of genocides<br />

<strong>The</strong> most well known genocide is the massacre of Jews by the Nazi Germans, known as the Holocaust.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re have been layers of difficulties in creating testimonial literature based on the phenomenon of<br />

‘genocides.’ First, the majority of witnesses of the event have literally demised due to the massacre.<br />

Second, many survivors tended to keep their experience to themselves and suppress their own dreadful<br />

memories. Third, even when testimonies are made, they are not conveyed to the audience and tend to be<br />

distorted when consumed.<br />

Furthermore, is it at first possible to represent an event such as Auschwitz? Its representation will likely<br />

lead to problems of under-representation, staleness and commercialization of the event. <strong>The</strong>se kinds of<br />

concerns have been repeated since <strong>The</strong>odor W. Adorno first claimed that “It is barbaric to write poems<br />

after Auschwitz.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> ‘culture’ (or ‘civilisation’ which is the opposite of ‘savage’) of madness that is implied in Adorno’s<br />

statement is itself considered to be barbaric. If the extreme materialisation of “barbarism of civilisation<br />

107<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

itself” was the Holocaust, nuclear power could also be considered another materialisation of ‘civilisation’s<br />

savageness’ centred on the beliefs of scientism, ultra-utilitarianism and profit-centred thinking regardless<br />

of its military or peaceful usage as a power source.<br />

<strong>The</strong> complexity of such problems results in the difficulty of representing and testifying on events such as<br />

the genocides. <strong>The</strong> term of ‘impossibility of representation’ or ‘impossibility of testimony’ (of Auschwitz)<br />

refers to such overall phenomena.<br />

5. <strong>The</strong> lessons of ‘<strong>The</strong> Diary of Anne Frank’<br />

Anne Frank’s family immigrated to Amsterdam, Netherlands from Frankfurt in 1933 when Hitler’s regime<br />

took power and began to suppress the population. However, by May 1940 Nazi Germany moved forward<br />

to also occupy the Netherlands. <strong>The</strong> Frank’s went into hiding in May 1942 until they were captured by the<br />

German Gestapo at their hiding place. <strong>The</strong> Frank’s were sent to Auschwitz after being captured, and Anne<br />

and her sister Margot were subsequently sent to Bergen-Belsen in late 1944. At the camp, the sisters were<br />

infected by typhus which led to their subsequent death in late February and early March 1945.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Diary of Anne Frank continues to have a great value to this day as a textbook of remembering the<br />

history of Jewish suppression and recognising the importance of peace-building.<br />

However, the readers of this book should also take note of the criticism by Bruno Bettelheim. Bettelheim<br />

was a Jew from Vienna, born in 1903 and is a survivor of the Buchenwald concentration camp. After<br />

immigrating to the US he became a prominent professor at the University of Chicago, specialising in<br />

development psychology. He left several articles reflecting on his experience at the concentration camp.<br />

He also committed suicide in 1990.<br />

In an article titled ‘<strong>The</strong> ignored lesson of Anne Frank’, he illustrated three psychological mechanisms that<br />

‘civilised people’ felt when first informed of the Nazi death camps. First, people believe that these abuses<br />

and massacres are conducted by only a mad minded few. Second, they neglect such reports of the events<br />

as propaganda or exaggerations. And third, while they believe the report, they tend to ‘quickly suppress<br />

the knowledge of horror as soon as possible.’ <strong>The</strong> reason for the success of the book, theatre plays and<br />

movies on the Diary of Anne Frank implies the wish to destroy the personality of the concentration camps<br />

and oppose the murderous character of such perception.<br />

I believe that praises for Anne Frank’s story cannot be explained without acknowledging that there is a<br />

wish to forget about the gas chambers behind them. We must admit our efforts to forget the horrors by<br />

108


admiring Anne’s struggle to run away from the looming disaster by escaping into a world of poetic and<br />

delicate beauty.<br />

Bettelheim argues that the major success of the theatre plays and movies based on the Diary of Anne<br />

Frank is due to their ‘false endings.’ In the end, we hear the voice of Anne from afar. She says that “Despite<br />

all these terrible things, I believe that all people are still kind inside.” <strong>The</strong>se unbelievable emotions are<br />

alleged to have come from the girl that had to witness the death of her sister before the same fate awaited<br />

her, the girl that had to face the death of her mother and the girl that had to witness the death of thousands<br />

of other children. <strong>The</strong>se words cannot be justified by any passage that was left in Anne’s diary.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se emotional words on the kindness of people seem to revive Anne Frank and seem to liberate us to<br />

confront the grave challenges that have been instigated by Auschwitz. This is the reason why we tend to<br />

feel good after reading her words. This is the reason why millions of people love these plays and movies.<br />

It is because that while these stories make us confront the existence of Auschwitz, at the same time they<br />

also steer us to ignore its meaning. If all people were kind inside, Auschwitz would never, ever have been<br />

possible and it would be impossible for a similar event to occur again.<br />

Bettelheim’s claim that the Diary of Anne Frank has been distorted internally through psychological<br />

mechanisms of suppression and defensive denial including a “willingness to forget about the gas<br />

chambers.” <strong>The</strong>se are grave warnings that we should take note of.<br />

6. Frankl and Levi<br />

Victor E Frankl’s Night and Mist in Japan (originally Ein Psychologe erlebt das Konzentrationslager or<br />

Man’s Search for Meaning for the English version) is one of the masterpieces written by a survivor of the<br />

concentration camps.<br />

<strong>The</strong> writer was a psychoanalyst from Vienna that studied under Freud and Adorno. However, being a<br />

Jew his family was captured by the Nazi Germans when they took Austria and sent them to camps in<br />

Auschwitz. His parents, wife and children died in these camps, but he lived on. This book is a record of<br />

such bleak experience.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Japanese edition of this book has an Introduction by the editor dated August 1956. <strong>The</strong> Introduction<br />

has the following words.<br />

I wish to believe that “knowing for a person that seeks self-reflection is to go beyond one’s limitations.”<br />

109<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

I also believe that we must endeavour to prevent such tragic journey happening again by political action<br />

and determinations in our everyday lives.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Japanese version of this book was published ten years after the war, when survivors of the Holocaust<br />

slowly began to introduce their literature and records. <strong>The</strong> public then also started to take notice of such<br />

publications. <strong>The</strong> Introduction by the editor mentioned above seems to illustrate the perception and<br />

determination of the publishing community at that time. This book subsequently became a bible to study<br />

the Holocaust in Japan and it continues to enlighten many today.<br />

However, the very foundation of this enlightenment viewpoint that believes in “people’s progress<br />

through knowledge” is being challenged today by wars, massacres and nuclear disasters brought about<br />

by scientism and ultra-utilitarianism. We are now faced with the question of whether indeed humans are<br />

capable of self-reflection and whether humans can go beyond their limitations through knowledge. Primo<br />

Levi was a person that struggled with such dire and difficult problems throughout his life.<br />

<strong>The</strong> most prominent Japanese scholar on Primo Levi in Japan, Professor Takeyama Hirohide of<br />

Ritsumeikan University, attempted a comparison of Frankl and Levi in his recent biography Primo Levi:<br />

the writer that saw the truth of Auschwitz (Gen So Sa, 2011).<br />

Primo Levi and Frankl both experienced the same concentration camps but had very different approaches<br />

to the experience. Frankl was interested mainly in the psychological changes of people in the camps.<br />

However, his central interests were not the usual prisoners that were exhausted by forced labour and<br />

eventually killed. His writing focused on how to survive in concentration camps and how to raise oneself<br />

in times of extreme conditions. He thought about the ‘meaning of agony.’<br />

Through this journey, Frankl introduced Auschwitz as an environment of extreme conditions which led to<br />

enhancement of the human mind. He also believed there were deep meanings to be ‘sacrificed.’ He even<br />

used words such as ‘martyrs’ in some of his writings.<br />

Takeyama argued that Frankl’s writings “surfaced a strong religious emotion in the end” and evaluated his<br />

writings to be ‘moving’ but “having some kind of vague dissatisfaction.” What is the source of such “vague<br />

dissatisfaction”?<br />

Bruno Bettelheim who was also an Austrian survivor of the concentration camps and a psychologist had<br />

a different position. Bettelheim argued that calling the sacrificed of the camps as martyrs was a “sort of<br />

invented distortion to comfort ourselves.”<br />

110


Such distortion could be considered as taking away the final perception of the sacrificed from them and<br />

neglecting the final respect that we could give to them. It could also be considered a denial to accept the<br />

full meaning of their deaths. We must not romanticize their death for the slight psychological liberation<br />

that is generated by such distortion.<br />

According to Bettelheim, Frankl’s writings seem to be strengthening our defensive denial and suppression<br />

by giving false comfort and liberation to the reader. Despite the horrible descriptions, Frankl’s strong<br />

religious interest seems to lead to a ‘moving’ conclusion that there are meanings to all pain. Based on this<br />

view, Frankl’s writings along with the Diary of Anne Frank became bestsellers by invoking such meaning<br />

and emotion. His writings also seem to support the ‘impossibility of testimony.’<br />

In Takeyama’s abovementioned biography, he claims that Levi, unlike Frankl, “did not tend to rely on<br />

religion” and says the following.<br />

If Levi did not rely on religion, what did he pursue? <strong>The</strong> answer to this question seems to be the meaning<br />

of Auschwitz and why such things were built.<br />

When Frankl tried to show where the human mind leaned against when faced with extreme conditions<br />

such as Auschwitz, Levi focused on why such extreme conditions were made in the first place. Most<br />

people when faced with dire, extreme conditions ‘beyond their normal comprehension’ such as wars,<br />

massacres and natural disasters, they tend to consider such event as fate and the actions of the heavens<br />

and the gods. <strong>The</strong>y tend not to understand the reasons behind the disasters for it is difficult, and they try<br />

to rationalize such events through a transcending existence. However, if the difficulties were the result<br />

of human’s, we must strive to ‘understand’ them and seek the reasons behind such actions even though it<br />

would be difficult.<br />

<strong>The</strong> difference between Frankl and Levi seems to be one of a ‘clinical approach’ focused on how to live<br />

in such dire conditions, and a ‘pathological approach’ emphasizing the reasons behind such reality. <strong>The</strong><br />

two approaches are not mutually exclusive or conflicting. However, the two are often confused and seem<br />

to confront each other being on the same level. Also, they tend to be emotionally consumed by a distorted<br />

mindless message that says “it is important to seek how to live within one’s fate than ineffectively<br />

seeking to understand what one cannot understand.” While such acceptance might help the lives of some<br />

individuals, it will not help to seek the reason behind these terrible events and preventing their future<br />

recurrence.<br />

111<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

6. “<strong>The</strong> Radius Paradox”<br />

<strong>The</strong> western region of Tokyo that I live in is 200 kilometres away from the site of the nuclear disaster.<br />

This is a subtle distance. Following the accident, the government announced the evacuation area to be<br />

within a 20 km radius of the site and announced the 30 km range to be ‘preparation areas for emergency<br />

evacuation.’ Later on it was found that there were areas beyond the 30 km boundary which were<br />

severely contaminated by radio-active materials. <strong>The</strong>se areas were announced as ‘planned evacuation<br />

areas’ and shortly became uninhabited. However, there have also been experts that argued that the<br />

cities of Fukushima or Koriyama, which are tens of kilometres away from the nuclear plant, have also<br />

been contaminated by radio-active materials several times the level of Tokyo and should be considered<br />

uninhabitable for everyday life.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n is Tokyo, which is 200 km from the site, safe to live in? It seems not. It is likely that Tokyo will also<br />

be contaminated by radio-active materials that will flow into the city by wind, rain, rivers and the sea. It<br />

could also flow in through the distribution channels of various agricultural products and seafood.<br />

While it was impossible to conduct a thorough examination following the accident, it has now been<br />

confirmed one year following the event that it was just a work of chance that the nuclear power plant<br />

accident did not have any direct influence on Tokyo. Following the accident, the US government ordered<br />

its citizens residing in Japan to evacuate from within the 80 km radius range. This was not an overreaction,<br />

but turned out to be the right action based on better information and analysis.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Japanese government announced in late 2011 that the nuclear power plant that caused the accident<br />

to have reached a state of ‘cold shutdown.’ However, the power plant continues to be unstable to this day.<br />

Contaminated water continues to flow out from the reactors and it would not be a surprise if the pools<br />

containing the used fuel rods explode any day. <strong>The</strong> Fukushima nuclear power plant will continue to exert<br />

radio-active materials for several years onward. And it could be the source of an even more severe disaster<br />

if another accident occurs, such as another earthquake or tsunami.<br />

Despite such facts, most people in Tokyo have no plans of fleeing and continue on with their lives as<br />

usual. Furthermore, even people living in close distances to the nuclear accident site continue on with their<br />

lives. What are the reasons behind such inaction?<br />

<strong>The</strong> majority of people living further from the damaged site lack the imagination to think about the truth<br />

of such damage. It is not easy for a Tokyo citizen to sympathize with the difficulties of a Fukushima<br />

citizen. It is not easy for a Korean to sympathize with the vague anxiety and horror that the Japanese<br />

112


people live with today. <strong>The</strong> further you live from the site on the radius, the more difficult it is to imagine<br />

the severity of the disaster.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n would you have a more urgent sense of anxiety and horror if you live closer to the damaged area?<br />

This also seems not to be true. People tend not to confront the dire truth of living in these close areas and<br />

tend to rely on easy, positive thinking. It seems that defense mechanisms such as denial and suppression<br />

that were mentioned above are strong in play.<br />

<strong>The</strong> people that continue to live in dangerous areas tend to rely on a ‘fabricated truth for comfort’ to<br />

console themselves. <strong>The</strong> people that are far are unable to properly imagine the event, while people close<br />

by turn their eyes away from the ‘painful truth.’ This wrong combination of forces tends to conceal the<br />

truth, undervalue the damage and avoid responsibilities. It only seems to help the people that would like<br />

to maintain the nuclear power plants for profit or potential military usage. In other words, they are helping<br />

the “sad secret guardians of the final thunder.”<br />

People that live further away from the damaged site should try to be more creative and imaginative in<br />

understanding the truth of the damage. And people that live near the damaged site must have the courage<br />

to face the harsh realities. <strong>The</strong> witnesses must endeavour to go beyond the ‘limitations of representation’<br />

in their testimony and the common people must strive to use their imagination to go beyond their<br />

‘imagination’s limits.’ This is what our time requires from us to prevent a recurrence of such disasters.<br />

It is without need to say that the majority must also use their imagination to understand the pain of the<br />

minorities.<br />

113<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Gilgamesh:<br />

A Mesopotamian Epic in Modern War<br />

Wai Chee Dimock<br />

Yale University<br />

I would like to begin with a collaboration between Pulitzer-winning poet Yusef Komunyakaa and<br />

dramaturg Chad Gracia. In 2006 these two teamed up for a stage adaptation of Gilgamesh: the text was<br />

published by Wesleyan University Press, 1 the play was performed at the 92 nd Street Y in New York; at the<br />

Chicago <strong>Humanities</strong> Festival; at the Institute of Contemporary Art in Boston; and also in New Orleans,<br />

Komunyakaa’s home for many years.<br />

STAGING<br />

<strong>The</strong>se were lean productions, with a small crew, no set to speak of, and about six actors doing double<br />

or triple duty, not only playing more than one role but also serving as handy stage props. Making<br />

ingenious use of simple objects, they produced a wealth of visual effects to make up for the bareness<br />

of the stage. In the Chicago performances by the Silk Road <strong>The</strong>ater Project, the Goddess Ishtar, for<br />

instance, was shown only as a silhouette, a face in the moon, an effect accomplished with a flashlight<br />

and stretched cotton over a hula hoop. Humbaba, the guardian of the cedar forest and Gilgamesh’s<br />

main adversary, was meanwhile represented by a bamboo frame covered with green and brown fabric,<br />

moved around by three actors.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Silk Road <strong>The</strong>ater Project called this kind of theater “stylized and actor-driven.” Another name for<br />

it would be poor man’s theater, low-tech, low-cost, using nothing more than the primitive resources of<br />

the dramatic medium. This does not mean low-quality performances: the Silk Road <strong>The</strong>ater Project is<br />

a respected company, the theater-in-residence at the First United Methodist Church, the oldest church<br />

1 Yusef Komunyakaa and Chad Gracia, Gilgamesh: A Verse Play (Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, 2006).<br />

114


in Chicago, housed in the historic Temple Building. <strong>The</strong>ir two performances of Gilgamesh were at the<br />

Oriental Institute at the University of Chicago and at the Museum of Contemporary Art, part of the<br />

Chicago <strong>Humanities</strong> Festival. That season, 2008-2009, they were awarded grants from Google, IBM,<br />

the MacArthur Foundation, and the National Endowment for the Arts. <strong>The</strong>ir low-budget production is<br />

rather a point of pride, the signature style of a theater with a particular vision of itself. Founded in 2002 by<br />

Malik Gillani and Jamil Khoury as a response to the anti-Arab and anti-Islam sentiments sweeping across<br />

the United States after the 9/11 attacks, the Silk Road <strong>The</strong>ater Project set out to be a grassroots theater,<br />

bringing back the multi-faith and multi-ethnic communities that once flourished on the trade routes linking<br />

China and India to the Middle East, North Africa, and Europe. <strong>The</strong> Komunyakaa-Gracia adaptation of<br />

Gilgamesh was very much in that spirit.<br />

I go into these details, because these empirical circumstances are almost never mentioned in theories<br />

of epic. While Mikhail Bakhtin draws on the language of theater to create an analytical vocabulary for<br />

the novel – for the “carnival” in Rabelais – the politics and pragmatics of stage adaptation are subjects<br />

that never come up when he discusses the epic, when he dismisses it as a dead-end genre, ossified and<br />

moribund, with only a past and no present, no future. 2 What difference does it make to see the epic through<br />

an empirical lens, through specific instances of translation, citation, and stage adaptation, instances of<br />

recycling that bring it back, break it up, and redistribute it across a variety of genres and media? How<br />

do these actions, often happening at irregular intervals and at locations hard to predict, complicate our<br />

understanding of this particular genre and of genres in general, both as an evolving field across time and<br />

as a cross-sectional spread at any given moment?<br />

<strong>The</strong> Komunyakaa-Gracia adaptation not only reaches back to the oldest known epic, a non-Western one,<br />

predating the Iliad and the Odyssey by a thousand years, it also reminds us of the largely local and largely<br />

ungeneralizable contexts for recycling, some having to do with the nitty-gritty of on-site production, and<br />

some much broader in scope, fed by large-scale events such as global terrorism and the 9/ll attacks. How<br />

do these input networks – macro and micro, and any number of intermediate ones in between – bear on<br />

the form of the epic, its morphological spectrum over the course of five thousand years, as well as the<br />

texture and minutiae of any particular example? What is the typical scale of operation for the genre, and<br />

how much variation might we expect as we go from one work to another, or even as we stay within the<br />

same work?<br />

2 M. M. Bakhtin, “Epic and Novel,” in <strong>The</strong> Dialogic Imagination, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist (Austin:<br />

Univ. of Texas Press, 1981), pp. 3-40.<br />

115<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

MASHUP<br />

<strong>The</strong> case of Gilgamesh is especially instructive. Unlike the Iliad and the Odyssey, the Sumerian epic was<br />

written, etched into clay tablets. <strong>The</strong>re were no rhapsodes here traveling around, selectively rearranging<br />

the oral epics as they traveled. And yet, in its enormous range of variations – far more extreme than<br />

the Homeric epics – this Sumerian text stands as the earliest (and still most stunning) example of a text<br />

that was never integral to begin with, a text that came into being and continued to flourish only through<br />

multiple acts of translating, combining, and recombining.<br />

Gilgamesh was a historical king who ruled in the Mesopotamian city of Uruk around 2750 BCE. Legends<br />

about him probably arose shortly after his death; they were first written in Sumerian, a non-Semitic<br />

language with no relation to Akkadian, the Semitic language in which Gilgamesh would eventually be<br />

circulated across Mesopotamia. This earliest Sumerian material seemed to have existed as five separate<br />

poems for about a thousand years – long after the Sumerian people were overrun by their Semitic<br />

neighbors – till about 1700 BC, when they began to be collated and translated into the cuneiform script<br />

of the Babylonian language, a dialect of Akkadian. <strong>The</strong> best-preserved were 12 tablets collated a bit later,<br />

probably around 1200 BCE, by the scholar-priest, Sin-liqe-unninni, and eventually brought to the library<br />

of Ashurbanipal, king of Assyria (668-627 BCE).<br />

As is clear from this brief account, the making of Gilgamesh was long drawn out even in ancient<br />

Mesopotamia; the shape of the text and its basic features varied tremendously from one collator to another,<br />

one translator to another. <strong>The</strong>se early efforts, however, were nothing like the monumental labor in the<br />

nineteenth century as European scholars were faced with hundreds and thousands of broken fragments of<br />

these clay tablets. 3 How to restore these to some legible order? Since the epic existed in so many different<br />

versions, put together by so many different scribes over such a long period of time, and since none of<br />

these had survived intact (even the most complete set, Sin-liqe-unninni’s, is missing approximately one-<br />

third of its lines), guesswork was unavoidable in the nineteenth century, and unavoidable in every modern<br />

translation. Stephen Mitchell’s, one of the most readable, uses Sin-liqe-unninni’s 12-tablet “Standard<br />

Version” as the primary source, filling in the gaps with words or lines from some other tablets and from<br />

the Sumerian poems. Andrew George’s 1999 Penguin edition and Benjamin Foster’s 2001 Norton Critical<br />

Edition go even further. In the Penguin, Sin-liqe-unninni’s “Standard Version” is presented along with four<br />

other versions: Babylonian texts from the early second millennium BCE; from the late second millennium;<br />

from the late second millennium, but from outside Babylonia; and finally, the Sumerian poems. In the<br />

3 David Damrosch, <strong>The</strong> Buried Book: <strong>The</strong> Loss and Rediscovery of the Great Epic of Gilgamesh (New York: Henry Holt,<br />

2007).<br />

116


Norton, four texts are offered: the “Standard Version”; the Sumerian poems; a late second millennium<br />

BCE translation of Gilgamesh into the Hittite language; and finally a parody called <strong>The</strong> Gilgamesh Letter.<br />

Both the Penguin and the Norton use square brackets and ellipses to indicate either conjectural inserts or<br />

unfillable gaps in the text.<br />

What counts as the “text” of Gilgamesh – what is included and what is left out, how the gaps are filled<br />

and with what additional material – reflects the editor’s preferences more than anything else. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

preferences can go quite far in remaking the text, giving it an up-to-date purpose, an up-to-date resonance.<br />

Stephen Mitchell, for instance, translating Gilgameth in the twenty-first century, cannot help seeing in<br />

the Mesopotamian epic “an eerie counterpoint to the recent American invasion of Iraq.” 4 Gilgamesh’s<br />

sudden announcement – “where the fierce monster Humbaba lives/ We must kill him and drive out evil<br />

from the world” – sounds in this context like the immemorial words of the “original preemptive strike.”<br />

Is this really a battle of good against evil, as Gilgamesh claims? “Everything in the poem argues against<br />

it,” Mitchell says. “As a matter of fact, the only evil we are informed of is the suffering Gilgamesh has<br />

inflicted on his own people: the only monster is Gilgamesh himself.” Humbaba, the targeted villain, “hasn’t<br />

harmed a single living being”: it is difficult to see him “as a threat to the security of Uruk or as part of<br />

the ‘axis of evil.’” On the contrary, as the guardian of the Cedar Forest, he “is a figure of balance and a<br />

defender of the ecosystem (having a monster of two around to guard our national forests from corporate<br />

and other predators wouldn’t be such a bad thing.)” 5<br />

Komunyakaa and Gracia do not claim for Gilgamesh quite this degree of contemporary relevance,<br />

although, as we will see, their play is not without topical accents of its own. Since theirs is not a translation<br />

but a stage adaptation – venturing into an entirely different medium – the allowable deviations are also<br />

much greater. Komunyakaa took full advantage of these, not only inventing entirely new characters but in<br />

some instances using the outline of the epic only as a loose-fitting shell to develop themes he had already<br />

been exploring elsewhere. <strong>The</strong> initial idea for the play had come not from him, but from Chad Gracia.<br />

Unlike Komunyakaa, a Pulitzer-Prize-winning poet, and unlike Stephen Mitchell, celebrated translator<br />

of the Bhagavad Gita, the Tao Te Ching, and the Book of Job, among other works, Chad Gracia is a<br />

dramaturg operating on a considerably lower level. (On his own website he is now listed as working in<br />

international trade and development, specializing in the Middle East.) It is fair to say that he is less the top<br />

dog in the theater world than a persevering fan of the Sumerian epic, determined to give it a contemporary<br />

staging.<br />

4 Stephen Mitchell, Introduction to Gilgamesh: A New English Version, trans. Stephen Mitchell (New York: Free Press,<br />

2004), p. 26.<br />

5 Ibid., pp. 29-30.<br />

117<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

CORRUPTIBLE BODY<br />

Gracia was first introduced to Gilgamesh as a young reader, when he was reading Will Durant’s Our<br />

Oriental Heritage. 6 It was the beginning of a lifelong attachment. For weeks after reading it, he could<br />

not get this line out of his head: “I too must die, for am I not like Enkidu?” <strong>The</strong> line is Gilgamesh’s. He<br />

and Enkidu have been inseparable up to this point, it has not been an issue; after the slaying of Humbaba,<br />

however, this inseparability begins to unravel, thematically as well as psychologically. Gilgamesh does<br />

not want to be exactly like his friend at just this moment, for Enkidu has been singled out for punishment<br />

by the gods: of the two, he is the one who must die. This differential outcome is in some sense the logical<br />

extension of the initial difference between the two friends: from the first we know that Gilgamesh is part<br />

God (through his mother, Ninsun, he is supposed to be “two-thirds divine, one-third human), whereas<br />

Enkidu seems to be part animal: he is the “man-beast of the Steppe.” 7 Both companions, it seems, are only<br />

fractionally human, but fractional in opposite ways, pointing to two antithetical forms of identity. How do<br />

these get resolved? If humans are always going to be part-animal, part-god, which of these two will rise<br />

to the top, or – realistically – which of these two will turn out to be the non-negotiable baseline, the most<br />

fundamental fact about us?<br />

<strong>The</strong> death of Enkidu raises the question to a fever pitch. No longer fully human, is there enough humanity<br />

left for the corpse to resist being banished to the other side? How long can it put off that eventuality, how<br />

long can it hold on to its fractional species membership, before being relegated once and for all to a much<br />

lower rung of the taxonomic hierarchy? <strong>The</strong> very nature of “humanness” seems to hang in the balance<br />

here – our place in the animate and inanimate world, our relations to other living things, and to non-<br />

sentient organic matter. Who are our kin, our kind? Especially troubling here is the physicality of the body<br />

and its seemingly inexorable outcome. Doesn’t a body like that doom us to being more animal-like rather<br />

than god-like? What exactly does it mean to be tackled to, and coextensive with, a body that is perishable<br />

and corruptible?<br />

Gilgamesh is unsparing on this point. Rather than giving Enkidu a dignified and ceremonious end, the<br />

last that we see of him is as a corpse, a mount of dead flesh, its deadness accented by a small visual detail<br />

with maximum shock effect, a revolting close-up that we are not allowed to look away from. It is this<br />

small detail that is stuck in Chad Gracia’s mind. We can think of it as a moment of “microcization”: in this<br />

case, it takes the form Gilgamesh hanging onto the corpse, not letting go, until “a maggot crawled from<br />

6 Chad Gracia, “Collaborating with Komunyakaa: <strong>The</strong> Creation of Gilgamesh,” Callaloo 28 (Summer 2005): 541-44,<br />

quotation from p. 542.<br />

7 Komunyakaa and Gracia, Gilgamesh: A Verse Play, p. 27.<br />

118


Enkidu’s nose.”<br />

Gracia was reading Ernest Becker’s <strong>The</strong> Denial of Death at the same time as he was reading Gilgamesh,<br />

and it seemed to him that what Becker was saying about human beings – that we are “gods with anuses”<br />

– could have served as well as a motto for the Sumerian epic. 8 Gross physicality is, of course, a common<br />

sight in the epic – there are also numerous instances in Homer, especially in the Iliad – but Gilgamesh is<br />

unique in putting the maggot at center stage, magnifying it far beyond its objective puniness. This is the<br />

less-than-human emblem of the less-than-human baseline of our species: it unites all of us, and it unites<br />

our species to all other species. As common denominators go, this one is exceptionally low, setting the bar<br />

for species membership at a level where there is in fact no sharp distinction between humans and animals,<br />

and no sharp distinction between the so-called civilized and the so-called barbaric. Death seen up closes;<br />

fear of dying oneself; the instant degradability of the physical body – these are the basic ingredients that<br />

make up the epic landscape, shared by humans and animals alike. <strong>The</strong> genre is “primitive” in this sense:<br />

not only is Gilgamesh the oldest literature known to humans, its emotions also happen to be raw, visceral,<br />

not complicated. From the standpoint of evolution, they represent the most elemental brain processes, first<br />

evolved and robustly shared by a large number of animal species, having been there from the first and<br />

likely to be there till the bitter end.<br />

Rather than being permanently stuck in the past and cut off from the living world, as Bakhtin contends,<br />

the epic is the genre of the living world. It is the genre that carries forward the most physically grounded<br />

emotions known to humankind, a prehistoric continuum surviving into modern times, fears and hurts<br />

undiminished in strength, undiminished in its sway over the species. It is able to serve as this carrier<br />

mostly by remaining a “low” genre: low, both in terms of its simple, death-driven narratives, and in terms<br />

of the deflating view of humanity that such narratives call up. This is a genre that puts us on a spectrum<br />

shared with other life-forms – gods on the one end, worms on the other – not leaving much doubt where<br />

we stand eventually. “Mortals” – this is the label that the epic reserves for our species. It sums us up.<br />

And, when the end arrives, as it is guaranteed to do, the epic quite often marks that occurrence with a<br />

formal spasm of sorts: simultaneously magnifying, contracting, and disorienting, giving the end of life the<br />

hallucinatory intensity that fills every inch of space and shrinks to a smaller and smaller point.<br />

MACRO AND MICRO<br />

All of which is to say that the epic is doing active work on more than one scale, going back and forth<br />

8 Chad Gracia, “Collaborating with Komunyakaa,” p. 542.<br />

119<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

between the large and the small and interweaving these two, bringing one to bear on the other, if not as<br />

an inverted prism then as a persistent counterpoint. Aristotle is wrong, then, to associate the epic only<br />

with the vexingly large. <strong>The</strong> vexingly small is equally within its province. In fact, simply on the basis<br />

of size, it probably does not make a lot of sense to maintain a strict separation between the epic and<br />

other genres, since its operating coordinates are far from uniform, with a broad spectrum of variation<br />

linked to an alternating rhythm, often crossing over into the territory that is traditionally assigned to<br />

other genres.<br />

In what follows, I would like to argue against a strict separation between epic and lyric. Rather than<br />

aligning the former only with the macro and the latter only with the micro, I would like to see these<br />

dimensional planes as up-and-down scalar variations that can be switched into and switched out of quite<br />

routinely, without too much fuss. Epic and lyric, on this view, are complementary registers, a functional<br />

duality perhaps present from the first, allowing the representational space to expand or contract as the<br />

need arises, alternating between the technically neutral bird’s eye view and the deliberately charged close<br />

up. While it still makes sense to think of lyric and epic as two more or less distinct genres, the “lyricization”<br />

of the epic is by no means oxymoronic, but an important operational dimension of the genre, making it<br />

scale-rich, scale-variable.<br />

<strong>The</strong> otherwise localized phenomenon of death, happening inside just one body, can be both hidebound<br />

and world-destroying for that reason, both center and circumference. In Gilgamesh it takes the form both<br />

of the concentrated repulsiveness of the maggot and of a reproducible story of grief and fear, occasioned<br />

by the corruptibility of the body and expanding to include many spinoffs from that event. It is a story<br />

populated by a host of gods and a host of ambiguously unclassifiable creatures (such as Humbaba or<br />

the Scorpion People). All have some relation to humans, to the mortals that we are. <strong>The</strong> epic is a multi-<br />

scale, multi-species environment. It is a genre that stretches the bounds of representation far beyond the<br />

customary borders of the “real,” turning the unthinkably alien into creatures visitable, conversable. It<br />

should come as no surprise, then, that one of the names the epic would adopt in the twentieth century is<br />

“science fiction.” For this is indeed one of the modern guises of the ancient genre, adding extraterrestrial<br />

species and interplanetary travel to its plot, but otherwise sticking with the same death-driven and life-<br />

seeking narratives, and the emotions they reproduce and reactivate. Intimation of mortality, the physical<br />

nature of the body, and the up-for-grabs definition of “humanness” itself – these basic ingredients of the<br />

Mesopotamian epic are also the basic ingredient of science fiction.<br />

This essay will indeed end with an episode of Star Trek as a twentieth-century recycling of epic, one that<br />

reaches back in self-conscious tribute to Gilgamesh. This example, and numerous others like it, suggests<br />

that the epic is best explored as a cascading form, with a downstream textual field exploding in volume,<br />

120


energized by various projective arcs, and increasingly scattered across a variety of genres and media.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Star Trek episode is indeed a striking example of the latter, a transcribing and redirecting of those<br />

cuneiform tablets onto a non-text-based (or at least not strictly text-based) platform, one that is mass<br />

circulated, low in literary prestige but high in the number of viewers. <strong>The</strong> ease with which the epic can<br />

make it onto the TV screen points to at least three things: first, the genre seems to have an easily mobilized<br />

set of optics, a predisposition towards images, perhaps because humans have always been more visual<br />

than linguistic, because human emotions before the advent of language were triggered by visual cues; 9<br />

secondly, and for the same reason, popular culture is not a problem for the epic – it is entirely at home<br />

here, its primitive grieves and fears and its easily visualizable plots needing no exegesis, comprehensible<br />

even to the unschooled; finally, the frequency of recycling speaks to “lyricization” as one of the most<br />

important self-propagating mechanisms of the genre, since it is certainly not the entire epic, but a very<br />

small group of words that are selectively highlighted, extracted, and circulated anew, gaining new<br />

meanings and entering into new associations in an entirely different environment. It is not the large size<br />

of the epic but the portability of a tiny fraction of it that allows it to spread far and wide, to be cited and<br />

embedded over and over again, in countless new updates and remakes.<br />

But if so, portability would seem to rest on something like the non-integrity of the original text – the ease<br />

with which it can be broken up, pieces of it dislodged and taken elsewhere, mixed in with new material<br />

not only in foreign environments but often ones operating at a lower elevation. As we have seen with<br />

Gilgamesh, the general tendency for the epic, in the thousands of years of its unfolding, is to drift steadily<br />

downward: assimilating itself to more popular tastes, moving to more popular venues, speaking the street<br />

vernacular of the locals and, in the case of Star Trek, the media vernacular of a popular TV series. <strong>The</strong> epic<br />

is eminently “corruptible” in this sense – random composting is natural to it; fragmenting, fermenting,<br />

and disintegrating are its life-forces. Not only does the genre have a thematic interest in the degradability<br />

of matter, it is itself a part of that process, doing so with gusto, fed by the unsparing but microscopically<br />

vital downward percolations that carry the process forward. From this perspective, the maggot is not only<br />

a repulsive detail, it is a counter-intuitively lyrical detail, a closeup too minute for comfort but also life-<br />

giving in that minuteness. It keeps the epic going, just as it keeps the earth going.<br />

9 Antonio R. Damasio and Jonathan H. Turner, among others, have argued that emotions evolved much earlier than<br />

language did, and that pre-linguistic affect was largely visual in nature. See, for instance, Antonio R. Damasio, <strong>The</strong><br />

Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness (New York: Harcourt Brace, 999);<br />

Jonathan H. Turner, On the Origins of Human Emotions: A Sociological Inquiry into the Evolution of Human Affect<br />

(Stanford: Stanford UP, 2000).<br />

121<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

THE MAGGOT AND THE BIOSPHERE<br />

What would a play look like that gives pride of place to the maggot, dedicated to the twin concepts of<br />

corruptibility and renewability? Chad Gracia started casting about for a playwright already thinking along<br />

those lines. Komunyakaa caught his attention right away, since this poet already has under his belt a poem<br />

entitled “Ode to a Maggot”:<br />

Brother of the blowfly<br />

And godhead, you work magic<br />

Over battlefields,<br />

In slabs of bad pork<br />

And flophouses. Yes you<br />

Go to the root of all things.<br />

You are sound and mathematical.<br />

Jesus, Chris, you’re merciless<br />

With the truth. Ontological and lustrous,<br />

You cast spells on beggars & kings<br />

Behind the stone doors of Caesar’s tomb<br />

Or split trench in a field of ragweed.<br />

No decree or creed can outlaw you<br />

As you take every living thing apart. Little<br />

Master of earth, no one gets to heaven<br />

Without going through you first. 10<br />

“Ode to the Maggot” was published in 2000, in Talking Dirty to the Gods. Komunyakaa was probably<br />

not thinking of Gilgamesh when he wrote this poem, and in fact its emotional orientation is significantly<br />

different. In Gilgamesh, the maggot is harsh, unstoppable, the voice of necessity from the biosphere.<br />

“Ode to the Maggot,” on the other hand, is almost a fond tribute to the “little/ Master of earth,” finding<br />

something “ontological and lustrous” where most people would only be repelled – a shift in perspective<br />

and in scale of attention that marks a shift from epic to lyric, recognizable even within a strict definition of<br />

10 Yusef Komunyakaa, Talking Dirty to the Gods (New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2001).<br />

122


those two genres. <strong>The</strong> shift is not too difficult, for the maggot in fact has the scalar flexibility that allows<br />

it to be at home in both genres, at home in the alternating rhythm that links the two. On a lyrical note, it<br />

reminds us that decomposing texts, like decomposing bodies, are the lifeblood of any generative process,<br />

a thought twined around the corruptibility of matter that it executes on the epic stage. This modern-day<br />

maggot, in short, has enough in common with the ancient one in Mesopotamia to convince Chad Gracia<br />

that Komunyakaa “had a Gilgamesh waiting inside of him all along.” 11<br />

EPIC DNA<br />

It is an interesting idea, a theory of literature based on the virtual guarantee of cross-time reproduction.<br />

Even as the epic carries forward the evolutionary psychology of the human species on a large scale,<br />

it would seem itself to be enacting a micro-evolution on its own, long drawn out, but apparently not<br />

especially precarious. What Chad Gracia is proposing, in fact, is a kind of literary genetics, a form of<br />

transcribing and transcoding, according to which the DNA of a text might lie dormant, with a “waiting”<br />

period of long duration, but eventually coming forth, spreading to unexpected places and interacting with<br />

these environments, producing new and altered copies of that long-distance genetic material. How do we<br />

otherwise account for the proven track record of Gilgamesh, its ability to get itself recycled over and over<br />

again, not always predictably, but not without some degree of regularity?<br />

Here, the answer might be both simpler and more inexorable than we think. For to the extent that the death<br />

of physical organisms has remained a hard fact across time – one of the key constants of the biosphere –<br />

and to the extent that most of us have remained unreconciled to it, unconsoled in its necessity, mortality<br />

might turn out to be the single most potent bit of epic DNA, carried forward without diminishment from<br />

century to century. <strong>The</strong> primitive devastations of Gilgamesh are no less devastating now than they were<br />

5000 years ago. It is the potency and transmissibility of this particular bit of genetic material that make the<br />

epic robust, durable, and reproducible.<br />

In the case of Komunyakaa, though, the epic DNA reproduced throughout his corpus might not even be<br />

mortality as a general condition, but rather the smaller, grosser pressure point that is the maggot. This<br />

particular fascination no doubt has something to do with his background and the entwined coarseness and<br />

delicacy surrounding death in that particular environment. Komunyakaa grew up in Bogalusa, Louisiana,<br />

40 miles north of New Orleans, the son of a carpenter. He was given the name James William Brown, but<br />

later reclaimed the African name Komunyakaa, the name of his grandfather, a stowaway from the West<br />

11 Chad Gracia, “Collaborating with Komunyakaa,” p. 544.<br />

123<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Indies (“My grandfather came from Trinidad/Smuggled in like a sack of papaya/.../ <strong>The</strong> name Brown<br />

fitted him like trouble”). 12 <strong>The</strong> family was poor. One of the effects of that poverty is that there is a kind<br />

of companionship with death, a companionship with the act of killing, and with what happens after the<br />

killing. In the “Meat” section of the long poem, “A Good Memory,” Komunyakaa writes:<br />

Folk magic hoodooed us<br />

Till the varmints didn’t taste bitter<br />

Or wild. We boys & girls<br />

Knew how to cut away musk glands<br />

Behind their legs. Good<br />

With knives, we believed<br />

We weren’t poor… Sometimes<br />

We weighed the bullet<br />

In our hands, tossing it left<br />

To right, wondering if it was<br />

Worth more than the kill. 13<br />

Someone who does this every day is going to have a very different attitude not only to meat consumption<br />

but to the edible nature of bodies. Hunger, a perennial problem in Bogalusa, would have been much worse<br />

if this had not been the case, if individual bodies were not so easily degradable, so easily absorbed back<br />

into the vital processes of the biosphere. It is this recycling-based aesthetics that gives the maggot an<br />

honored place in Komunyakaa’s poetry, giving it the same ontological centrality (if a somewhat different<br />

emotional charge) that it carried in Gilgamesh. And of course it was this small, diligent, and easily<br />

portable bit of epic DNA that would also accompany the poet as he went to war.<br />

Komunyakaa went to Vietnam. He was there from 1969 to 1970, working for the Army’s newspaper,<br />

<strong>The</strong> Southern Cross, covering the military action, and writing articles on Vietnamese history, which won<br />

him a Bronze Star. He also published a volume of poems, Dien Cau Dau, perhaps the most memorable<br />

poetry to come out of Vietnam War. In this volume, there is another poem, “We Never Know,” seemingly<br />

descended from Gilgamesh as well, reenacting the same divided tableau of one dying and one surviving,<br />

and once again putting flies and maggots at the center:<br />

12 Yusef Komunyakaa, “Mismatched Shoes,” in Magic City, p. 42.<br />

13 Yusef Komunyakaa, “A Good Memory,” in Neon Vernacular (Hanover: University of New England Press for Wesleyan<br />

UP, 1993), pp. 14-22, quotation from pp. 14-15.<br />

124


He danced with tall grass<br />

for a moment, like he was swaying<br />

with a woman. Our gun barrels<br />

glowed red-hot.<br />

When I get to him,<br />

A blue halo<br />

of flies had already claimed him.<br />

I pulled the crumbled photograph<br />

from his fingers.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re’s no other way<br />

to say this: I fell in love.<br />

<strong>The</strong> morning cleared again<br />

except for a distant mortar<br />

& somewhere choppers taking off,<br />

I slid the wallet into his pocket<br />

& turned him over, so he wouldn’t be<br />

kissing the ground.<br />

<strong>The</strong> dead man in the poem is a complete stranger, most likely an enemy combatant, someone the poet<br />

has just killed, someone he is supposed to kill. Yet this death is anything but routine. On the contrary, it<br />

is self-consciously lyrical: a spot of time special unto itself, luminous and overflowing with meaning, its<br />

smallness amplified into something much larger. It is fitting that this subjectively magnified event should<br />

be coupled with and offered in counterpoint to the larger narrative of war, here miniaturized in its turn,<br />

for death in combat is indeed a classic moment of scalar instability, oscillating between two or more<br />

phenomenal planes, between epic expanse and lyric compression, between the impersonal necessity of<br />

killing and the convulsiveness of death as bodily event.<br />

<strong>The</strong> poem begins, in any case, on a lyrical note, with a slightly blurred, almost hallucinatory image of the<br />

enemy combatant swaying and dancing. But it pulls back from that lyricization as it moves swiftly to the<br />

other end of the emotional spectrum, its descriptive lens zeroing in on the now-fallen body, with a “halo<br />

of flies” already gathered. It is unsightly, grossly reductive and deflating, turning the dead soldier instantly<br />

into a corpse just like any other corpse: edible flesh, food for worms. We could call this a moment of<br />

ecological realism, an impersonal, across-the-board recycling downward. But if so, this particular form<br />

of recycling is nonetheless one that acknowledges the subjectivity of each organism, rather than erase<br />

it completely. In fact, in a double-stranded structure almost like a double helix, the ecological realism is<br />

coupled here with a sentiment-based lyricism that counters it, a lyricism that grants the fallen soldier a<br />

125<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

degree of individuality almost beyond what we might realistically believe. Startlingly, completely out<br />

of the blue, the poet announces that he has fallen in love. We don’t know who he has fallen in love with,<br />

whether it is the dead man himself, or the person in the crumbled photograph pulled out of his wallet just<br />

before he dies. But that almost does not matter. <strong>The</strong> identity of the recipient is less important than the fact<br />

that the sentiment is there, amplified and cherished and given poetic life. Both epic and lyric are honored<br />

by this alternating rhythm, a scalar flexibility that unmakes and remakes, as tender as it is hard-nosed.<br />

And the alternation persists. Komunyakaa now makes another gesture in the direction of lyric as he does<br />

one last thing: he puts the wallet back into the dead man’s pocket and turning him over, face up. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

gestures, each deliberate, each unexplained, and all non-trivial, do not change the fact that the dead man<br />

is organic matter. <strong>The</strong>y do not have the power to fend off the “blue halo/ of flies” that are most certainly<br />

there. On the contrary, it is the visceral proximity of those flies that makes the cross-stitched rhythm<br />

of epic and lyric so powerful, with two force fields intertwined and yet pulling in opposing directions,<br />

energized by that paradox, carrying forward both the non-negotiability of our physical end and the<br />

infinitely negotiable turns of textual reproduction.<br />

VARIATION AND MUTATION<br />

Since this alternating rhythm is so close to the expanding and contracting phenomenal planes of<br />

death in combat, 14 we should not be surprised that, in his more recent collection, Warhorses (2008), as<br />

Komunyakaa turns from Vietnam to Iraq and Afghanistan, the same genetic material from Gilgamesh and<br />

the same double-stranded structure would be brought along, put to work in these new environments. <strong>The</strong><br />

cross-stitching of the large and the small is reflected this time in the very form of the poetry. In a long, 4-<br />

section poem called “Love in the time of war,” Komunyakaa devotes an entire section to the Sumerian<br />

epic, taking in the gods, the cosmos, but also lyricizing the death of one particular individual, turning it<br />

into an arresting micro-phenomenon:<br />

Gilgamesh’s Humbaba was a distant drum<br />

pulsing among the trees, a slave to the gods,<br />

a foreign tongue guarding the sacred cedars<br />

down to a pale grubworm in the tower<br />

before Babel. Invisible & otherworldly,<br />

14 In his classic meditation on historical method, Carlo Ginzburg also argues that war is an occasion interweaving the<br />

“extreme long shots” of macrohistory with the extreme “close-ups” of subjective experience. See Ginzburg, <strong>The</strong> Cheese<br />

and the Worms, trans. John and Anne Tedeschi (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ Press, 1980).<br />

126


he was naked in the king’s heart,<br />

& his cry turned flies into maggots<br />

& blood reddened the singing leaves. 15<br />

<strong>The</strong> death of Humbaba is given a context here, a psychology, not to say a visceral immediacy. Once again,<br />

the maggots are impossible to miss, although this key signifier has now been transferred from Enkidu to<br />

Humbaba. This unexpected shift suggests that the epic is perhaps distinguished above all by its “mutating<br />

genes,” that periodic shifts in its centers of gravity might turn out to be a crucial self-propagating<br />

mechanism, as important to the ongoing life of the epic form as anything that was written on the original<br />

clay tablets. Which is another way of saying that, for the cross-time continuum that is the epic, variation<br />

is the rule rather than the exception. Its ontology is the ontology of recycling: ongoing, ever-multiplying,<br />

often randomly generated.<br />

Humbaba is a case in point. As he appeared in the Mesopotamian texts, Humbaba was the guardian of<br />

the sacred Cedar Forest, restricted more or less to that sole function: he embodied a divine prohibition<br />

and, strangely, he was also supposed to be evil. Stephen Mitchell, as we have seen, has seized upon this<br />

apparent contradiction and turned it into a fable for our own time. According to him, the supposed evil of<br />

Humbaba is largely projected by Gilgamesh, a preemptive name-calling to justify a preemptive first strike.<br />

Komunyakaa and Gracia do not go quite so far, but, like Mitchell, they are also struck by Humbaba less<br />

as a substantive entity than as a cumulative rumor. With no demonstrable physical might, he is merely a<br />

rumbling sound. <strong>The</strong> stage directions say: “<strong>The</strong> marching-rolling sound of Humbaba’s approach is heard –<br />

circular. He is not seen. ‘Humbaba’ grows into a resounding echo.” 16 A creature of hearsay, Humbaba falls<br />

apart almost instantly in the stage adaptation. Enkidu says: “Humbaba is no god/ He is a small beast/ in a<br />

big forest./ He is only a roar/ among the night trees.” 17<br />

Humbaba as a small beast in a big forest is not strictly an invention by Komunyakaa and Gracia; it is not<br />

an absolute departure from the Sumerian epic. This ambiguously unclassified creature has always been an<br />

agent, a proxy; he executes the will of the gods and serves at their pleasure. And the Sumerian gods are<br />

nothing if not treacherous – it is Shamash, after all, who unleashes the thirteen winds that blind Humbaba<br />

and pin him down, turning his imminent victory over Gilgamesh into a defeat. Still, it takes the stage<br />

adaptation and “Love in the Time of War” to turn the fate of Humbaba into a fully imagined story about a<br />

low-level functionary, quite far down on the totem pole, done in by the higher power he serves, not only<br />

15 Yusef Komunyakaa, “Love in the Time of War,” Warhorses (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2008), p. 4.<br />

16 Gracia and Komunyakaa, Gilgamesh: A Verse Play, p. 49.<br />

17 Ibid. p. 50.<br />

127<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

a “slave to the gods” (which is more or less what we might expect) but – surprisingly – always a “foreign<br />

tongue” to them, meaningless as far as they are concerned, a tongue they never bother to learn.<br />

In what sense is Humbaba a “foreign tongue”? It is a manner of speaking, of course, since there is no<br />

evidence anywhere that the actual language spoken by Humbaba requires translation. His foreignness<br />

to the gods – his status as an alien – comes rather from the fact that, existentially and taxonomically, he<br />

belongs to a different league, a different order: they are immortal, he is not. Unlike the gods, and very<br />

much like Enkidu, Humbaba is perishable and corruptible, and the flies and maggots are there to prove<br />

it. <strong>The</strong>se creatures are nothing new, of course: they have always been with humans, with them “before<br />

Babel.” What is new, though, is that what is a given for human is now a given for Humbaba as well. Not<br />

even remotely god-like, he is no better and no different from his supposed adversaries. <strong>The</strong> label “mortal”<br />

applies to him just it does to him, making him an eternal underling, “invisible and otherworldly” to the<br />

gods. If there is any previous ambiguity about how to classify Humbaba, where he stands on the spectrum<br />

between gods and humans, the nature of his servitude and the nature of his death put that beyond doubt.<br />

<strong>The</strong> “humanization” of Humbaba – here, effectively a demotion – is indeed a significant departure from<br />

the Sumerian epic, a recycling so radical that I would like to call base modification. In “Love in the<br />

Time of War” it is not through Gilgamesh, and not even through Enkidu, but rather through Humbaba,<br />

that “humanness” is being defined, and defined in terms of its lowest common denominator, its physical<br />

degradation and psychological abjection. If the vitality of epic comes in part from a downdrift, a<br />

channeling of its emotional charge towards the lower rungs of the hierarchy, in the hands of Komunyakaa<br />

that downward momentum reinvents the genre even as it redraws the boundaries between what is human<br />

and what is not, giving us a transfigured baseline that is increasingly the center of gravity, and putting<br />

corresponding pressures on the shape of history told from that standpoint. For Komunyakaa, no less<br />

than for Stephen Mitchell, it is the history of the United States that recycles the Mesopotamian epic, that<br />

brings it up to the present. And, even though “slave to the gods” could have been just a catch phrase, the<br />

word “slave,” coming from Komunyakaa, is neither casual nor trivial. Nor is it casual or trivial that this<br />

particular layer of American history is being called up by the Iraq war, a military operation manned by<br />

those with no say in the process, “slaves” to higher powers who makes decisions from far above. What<br />

results from this base modification is a radical redrawing of the epic map, loosening the criteria for species<br />

membership even as it turns over the most vital part of the story to the lower ranks.<br />

RE-SCALING<br />

This outcome, so striking in “Love in the Time of War,” is not the only one possible, however. Even in the<br />

highly charged and overdetermined environment that is Iraq – ancient Mesopotamia doubling as a modern<br />

128


theater of war – Gilgamesh can resonate in multiple ways, its variants by no means speaking with one<br />

voice or mutating in the direction. While it is true that any gesture toward Gilgamesh would involve some<br />

meditation on death, the descriptive radius and emotional texture can be very different. <strong>The</strong> spectrum<br />

of variants here is as broad as can be. Even that powerful signifier – the maggot – turns out not to be<br />

absolutely indispensable. It too can be set aside, giving rise to a Gilgamesh with different contours, and<br />

a different set of features brought into relief. Indeed, an alternative mapping can be made, also revolving<br />

around the death of Enkidu but on a slightly enlarged scale – a level of resolution not centered on the<br />

maggot but taking in the larger view of the differential fate of the two companions: one dead, the other<br />

still alive, and still mourning, still bent over with grief. This tableau has been there as well from the dawn<br />

of time. When the analytic lens is trained on the maggot, this larger picture tends to be in the shadow, but<br />

when the scale is readjusted, it comes into sharp and devastating focus. Indeed, an entirely new lineup<br />

of works emerges as being on a continuum with Gilgamesh on the strength of this tableau, including<br />

Komunyakaa’s “We Never Know” that we discussed earlier. This slightly scaled-up bit of genetic material<br />

is as tenacious and durable as the tenacious and durable maggot. <strong>The</strong> epic form that is Gilgamesh could<br />

not have flourished without frequent recycling of this alternative scene.<br />

Since the morphology of the epic form is so crucially dependent on scale, on the shifting constellations<br />

that phase in and out as we go from one level of magnification to another, it clearly takes more than one<br />

work, and more than the corpus of one author, to explore even a fraction of these possible outcomes. In<br />

what follows, I would like to consider some of these alternative recycling routes by turning from Yusef<br />

Komunyakaa to Brian Turner, another poet of the Iraq War, also citing Gilgamesh, but doing so in the<br />

spirit of a sequence of perpetual endings and perpetual beginnings, involving more than one person, and<br />

picked up again sometimes after thousands of years.<br />

Brian Turner was in Iraq in 2003, stationed with the 3 rd Stryker Brigade Combat Team, 2 nd Infantry<br />

Division. I would like to discuss a pair of poems from Here, Bullet, a volume of poetry coming out of<br />

that experience. “Gilgamesh in Fossil Relief” wears its connection to the Sumerian epic on its sleeve; “A<br />

B Negative (<strong>The</strong> Surgeon’s Poem)” shows no sign of being connected at all. And yet this poem, about a<br />

patient named Thalia Fields who dies on the plane taking her to the hospital, is arguably part of the same<br />

epic cycle, returning again and again to the last moment of contact between the living and the dead and, in<br />

that way, returning again and again to Gilgamesh:<br />

... Thalia Fields is gone, long gone,<br />

about as far from Mississippi<br />

as she can get, ten thousand feet above Iraq<br />

with a blanket draped over her body<br />

129<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

and an exhausted surgeon in tears,<br />

his bloodied hands on her chest, his head<br />

sunk down, the nurse guiding him<br />

to a nearby seat and holding him as he cries,<br />

though no one hears it, because nothing can be heard... 18<br />

<strong>The</strong> featured exhibit here is a woman, but otherwise she is much like Enkidu, stone dead, clearly and<br />

unmistakably and insultingly so. But, true to the contrapuntal rhythm that remains a surprising constant<br />

against the tremendous variation within the epic form, she is nonetheless not alone. <strong>The</strong> flight surgeon,<br />

bending over her in tears, his bloodied hands on her chest, is still holding on, not letting go, even if his<br />

labor is ultimately futile. <strong>The</strong>y are strangers to each other; yet these hands are nonetheless a replay of that<br />

five-thousand-year-old scene between Gilgamesh and Enkidu, a replay of that ever-active gulf between<br />

the living and the dead, and our ever-active refusal to give in to it.<br />

All of this is implicit in “A B Negative (the Surgeon’s Story).” In “Gilgamesh, in Fossil Relief,” that ever-<br />

active refusal becomes the conceptual backbone for a different story, this time coming back explicitly to<br />

the Sumerian epic, paying homage to it but also revising its premise, its outcome, allowing for a different<br />

form of contact now across the line of mortality, and a haphazard but not impossible continuity of labor<br />

across time:<br />

In the month of Ab, late summer<br />

of the seventh century B.C.E., a poet<br />

chisels text into stone tablets, etching<br />

three thousand lines and brushing them by hand,<br />

the dust blown off with a whispered breath...<br />

In the mid-August heat of the year 2004,<br />

an archaeologist pauses over an outline<br />

of bone, one body’s signature in the earth,<br />

which he reads carefully with a camelhair brush<br />

and patience, each hairline fracture revealing. 19<br />

Once again, hands are in the foreground, in this case, two pairs of hands, almost like those of two manual<br />

18 Brian Turner, “AB Negative the Surgeon’s Poem,” in Here, Bullet (Farmington, Maine: Alice James Books), pp. 15-16.<br />

19 Brian Turner, “Gilgamesh, in Fossil Relief,” in Here Bullet, p. 53.<br />

130


laborers: one to get those 3000 lines chiseled into the stone tablets, and the other to retrace these lines with<br />

the help of a camelhair brush, uncovering what the other has done and restoring it to the world, bringing it<br />

into the present.<br />

I could be pedantic and point out that the cuneiform tablets were clay tablets, not stone, and that<br />

Gilgamesh was in fact first deciphered, not in the 2 st century, but in the nineteenth, by someone named<br />

George Smith, not American but British, but who did in fact come from a working-class background,<br />

someone who had to learn Cuneiform on his own by spending his lunch hours at the British Museum. 20<br />

Brian Turner sets aside this larger picture to make way for the miniaturized story he wants to tell, namely,<br />

the story of laboring hands, performing a task begun by one and carried on by the other. Brian Turner<br />

is not, on the whole, a utopian poet, someone driven by an overly idealized sense of what is possible.<br />

<strong>The</strong> other poems in Here, Bullet are filled with body bags, with Iraqi policemen being blown up, and an<br />

American private committing suicide. “Gilgamesh, in Fossil Relief” is not a departure from these poems,<br />

but it is a different way to come to terms with those events, turning their large traumas into small moments<br />

of continuity that are responded to in kind and perpetuated in kind. This particular “lyricization” of the<br />

Sumerian epic not only reworks war into a humanly meaningful incident, it also affirms recycling as a<br />

death-powered form of life, beginning with mortality rather than ending with it. <strong>The</strong>re is no better fate for<br />

Gilgamesh.<br />

20 David Damrosch, <strong>The</strong> Buried Book: <strong>The</strong> Loss and Rediscovery of the Great Epic of Gilgamesh (New York: Henry Holt,<br />

2007), pp. 12-15.<br />

131<br />

Session 1


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Session 2<br />

Plenary Session 2<br />

Nature and Civilization, Science and Technology


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Plenary Session 2<br />

Nature and Civilization, Science and Technology<br />

1. New Forms of Harmony between Human and Nature<br />

/ Hwe Ik Zhang (Seoul National University)<br />

2. Becoming the Alien: Avatar and District 9<br />

/ Andrew M. Gordon (University of Florida)<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> Work of Art in the Age of Digital Technology:<br />

What Kind of a Future Will Human Beings Create?<br />

/ Peter L. Rudnytsky (University of Florida)<br />

4. Illness and Art<br />

/ Desmond Egan (Irish Poet)


New Forms of Harmony between Human and Nature<br />

Hwe Ik Zhang<br />

Seoul National University<br />

Nature’s order and irregular features<br />

<strong>The</strong> harmony between human and nature can be considered in various contexts. But the one based on the<br />

conventional understanding of the relation between human and nature might not be very fruitful, because<br />

our conventional wisdom concerning it is by far outstripped by our current understanding of ‘nature’ and<br />

‘human’ within it. We therefore begin by briefly reassessing what we currently understand about nature on<br />

this occasion.<br />

We now have a Big Bang cosmology supported by the ‘standard model’ of particle physics. 1 According<br />

to it, the fundamental stuff, Higgs field, condensed into various fields and massive particles through a<br />

process called Higgs mechanism. This is an order generating process, metaphorically compared with<br />

the condensation of liquid water from gaseous steam. This was only the beginning of a series of similar<br />

order generating processes. As the temperature of the universe declined further, more orders emerged:<br />

compound particles such as atoms, molecules, and some macromolecules. Also, large structures formed:<br />

galaxies, stars and other heavenly bodies including the planets.<br />

In the process of this order formation, random fluctuations at the microscopic level give rise to various<br />

temporary arrangements of matter, some of which, according to their respective stabilities, would be<br />

chosen to persist as recognizable macroscopic orders. This kind of order forming mechanism will be<br />

called as Higgsian, in the sense that it is a generalized form of the Higgs mechanism. This mechanism of<br />

order formation will be contrasted to another more sophisticated Darwinian mechanism, which will be<br />

explained later.<br />

1 Brian Greene, <strong>The</strong> Fabric of the Cosmos (New York: Knopf, 2004).<br />

137<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

In addition to the general order forming mechanism, we would consider the way how the variety of<br />

complex and irregular features all around us, like the shape of rocks and valleys, came to be in existence.<br />

Recently an interesting theory attempting to explain this was proposed. It is the theory of self-organized<br />

criticality. 2<br />

From the very first moment of its birth, the universe was never in a state of equilibrium but quite active<br />

with certain flows of energy and matter in many places. Some of them accumulate in certain places and<br />

aggregate into an order of extensive scale. This order embedded in this extensive aggregate arises out<br />

of the local interactions between the components which were in disordered states. <strong>The</strong> process is often<br />

caused by random fluctuations and accidental arrangements amplified by positive feedback. <strong>The</strong> resulting<br />

organization is generally decentralized and distributed over all the components of the system. As such, it<br />

is robust and able to survive repairing certain amount of damage or perturbation. This process is called<br />

self-organization, typical examples being formation of crystal, emergence of convection patterns in liquid<br />

heated from below, chemical oscillators and many other complex patterns.<br />

So far it is a typical process occurring in Higgsian order forming mechanism. But the really interesting<br />

feature of it is the so-called ‘self-organized criticality’. Once the system arrives at its attractor, its<br />

macroscopic behavior displays the spatial and/or temporal scale-invariance characteristic of a phase<br />

transition, which means, the system bursts into pieces of every sizes distributed inversely proportional to a<br />

certain power of the size itself. Many apparent irregularities seen around us are, in fact, the results of such<br />

bursts from systems having arrived at self-organized criticality.<br />

<strong>The</strong> best illustration is provided by the ‘sand pile’ model. Consider a child on a beach letting sand trickle<br />

down from the hand to form a sand pile. As the process continues, the pile becomes steeper, and some<br />

sand begins to slide. And eventually the sand pile becomes so big and steep that avalanches of sand may<br />

happen. At this stage the behavior can no longer be explained in terms of the individual grains. It should<br />

instead be understood from the global property of the entire pile. This behavior of the critical sand pile<br />

mimics several phenomena observed across many areas, which are associated with complexity.<br />

<strong>The</strong> complex and irregular features all around us thus indicate that nature operates, in many occasions,<br />

in the self-organized critical states. Some irregular hard fragments of broken pieces are later utilized as<br />

building blocks for a more complicated systems serving as reliable constraints.<br />

2 Per Bak, How nature works: the science of self-organized criticality (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996).<br />

138


This is the picture of nature’s primary order, with certain irregular features, which were shaped by the<br />

Higgsian mechanism and certain self-organized criticality. This corresponds roughly to the ‘physical’<br />

composition of our world. We may call it ‘primary’ or ‘simple’ order in anticipation to the more<br />

complicated and interesting one, called as ‘secondary’ or ‘compound’ order, which the Darwinian<br />

mechanism would provide.<br />

Order, entropy and second law of thermodynamics<br />

<strong>The</strong> concept of ‘order’ seems to be abstract, but, in fact, quite concrete in the sense that it is measurable<br />

through the concept of entropy. <strong>The</strong>se concepts are related to our notion of microstates and macrostates.<br />

In nature, states of physical system obey the dynamical laws and we can enumerate dynamically<br />

distinguishable states in principle. But many of such states present identical responses to any external<br />

probe and thus indistinguishable in practice. <strong>The</strong>refore it is beneficial to group together a set of such<br />

states, called ‘microstates’, and designate it as a ‘macrostate.’ In many circumstances, the probability for<br />

the system to be in a microstate is identical to be in any other available microstate. <strong>The</strong>refore, the number<br />

of microstates W belonging to a given macrostate corresponds to the probability of the system to be in that<br />

macrostate. In this sense, W is often called thermodynamic probability of that macrostate.<br />

A meaningful macrostate, to which only a few microstates correspond (i.e. W is small), would be<br />

relatively hard to be achieved because the probability is low. Such a rarity, by definition, makes that<br />

macrostate highly ordered. <strong>The</strong> ‘order’ Θ of a system in that macrostate is therefore related to the inverse<br />

of W, i.e. 1/W, and formally defined by Θ = log(1/W) = -log W for some technical convenience. Since<br />

the entropy of that system is defined to be log W, the order defined this way is just the negative entropy.<br />

Another measure of order associated with a macrostate in a metastable state is the “time required for that<br />

macrostate to be formed accidentally by pure chance.” This is because the probability of an event and the<br />

time required to arrive at it is inversely proportional. This point will be utilized in later discussion.<br />

One of the most fundamental principles in nature is the second law of thermodynamics. It is in fact very<br />

simple: Nature goes always from less probable macrostates to more probable ones. But that holds for the<br />

overall process. Some macrostates jointly participating with others might go inverse direction toward<br />

higher order, provided some others in the process lose order as much or more, in compensation for it. All<br />

order forming phenomena, Higgsian or Darwinian, are examples of such local inversion.<br />

139<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Nature’s secondary process of order formation<br />

In addition to Higgsian, nature invented another way to arrive at order, called Darwinian, which is more<br />

sophisticated but enormously effective. To discuss the Darwinian mechanism and the resulting ‘compound’<br />

order, it is necessary to introduce the concept of ‘autocatalytic local order’(hereafter will be abbreviated<br />

as ALO). 3 It is a local order which performs itself as a ‘catalyst’ for producing another self-similar<br />

local order. Once such a local system has been produced, and assuming that it can catalyze at least one<br />

such system within its expected life time, it is only a matter of time such local order will occupy all the<br />

available sites in the whole system. And after that, the population of the ALO will persist for unlimited<br />

duration.<br />

Assume that a species of ALO appeared on a planet like Earth and the magnitude of the local order is the<br />

size of a microbe. <strong>The</strong>n, after a short period of rapid multiplication, there would be millions of (almost)<br />

identical copies of such a local order for an extended duration. This will make a favorable ground for<br />

the mutations to occur. Some mutated sets of ALO species may appear, and coexist for a while with the<br />

original ones. It is also possible that some of such ALO’s belonging to different species might possibly<br />

merge together to form a higher order species. This pattern of mutation may continue endlessly producing<br />

higher and higher order species. This is the basic elements of the Darwinian mechanism.<br />

To appreciate the efficacy of this mechanism, let us evaluate the time required for two consequent events<br />

to occur. Suppose that time T 1 is required for a local order O 1 to appear by pure chance, and time T 2 is<br />

required for a mutated local order O 2 to appear in the assumed presence of O 1. <strong>The</strong>n the total time T<br />

required for O 2 to appear from scratch would be<br />

T=T 1+T 2/n<br />

where n is the average expected number of O 1 at any moment during the period T 2(If a single O 1 persists<br />

all the time during T 2, n=1).<br />

Let us now assume that the life time τ of O 1 is much less than T 1. This is quite a reasonable assumption for<br />

highly organized local order, because it would be very hard to be formed accidentally(T 1 large), but rather<br />

easy to be disintegrated(τ small).<br />

3 <strong>The</strong> terms ‘autocatalytic’ and ‘catalyst’ employed here are generalizations from the terms normally used in chemical<br />

reactions. In biology, instead of ‘autocatalytic’, the term ‘self-reproducing’ is conventionally used.<br />

140


We can now compare the two processes: Higgsian and Darwinian. If the original local order, O 1, is non-<br />

autocatalytic, which means the process is Higgsian, n would be τ/T 1(O 1 appears once in T 1, but stays only<br />

τ after this appearance), while if it is autocatalytic, that is Darwinian, n is N, the average population of<br />

ALO during T 2.<br />

To estimate the numerical difference, let us assume that both T 1 and T 2 are one million year (10 6 year), the<br />

life time τ of O 1 is 3.65 day (10 -2 year), and the population of O 1, is saturated at N=10 5 . Further assume<br />

that O 1 makes two copied within its life time. It will take 17 generations (2 17 =131,072) to arrive at this<br />

saturated number. This means that 2 months are needed to get saturated. <strong>The</strong>n the estimated total time T<br />

required for O 2 to appear would be<br />

T=10 6 year + 10 14 year<br />

for Higgsian, and<br />

T=10 6 years + 10 years + 2 month<br />

for Darwinian.<br />

It means that you have to wait 100 trillion years (about seven thousand times the age of universe) after the<br />

appearance of original order to expect a mutated one in Higgsian process, while you need barely 10 years<br />

plus 2 month to get the same mutated one in Darwinian process! We should notice that the 100 trillion<br />

years needed to wait for O 2 to occur in Higgsian process means that it is such an enormously ordered<br />

object that it needs such a long time to achieve it accidentally. <strong>The</strong> magic of Darwinian process is that it<br />

made an order of such an enormous quality in such a short period.<br />

Where then lies the secret of it? We should not be deluded that the magic is hidden somewhere in the<br />

structure of the ALOs. Even with the identical structure, if the grounding order of the system on which the<br />

ALO locates is slightly different, the whole autocatalytic function may fail and no Darwinian mechanism<br />

operates. It is therefore necessary for an ALO to function as an ALO it should be part of a global order in<br />

which the autocatalytic activity is carried out in a close coordination between the ALO and the grounding<br />

order and also between the ALO’s themselves. In fact, the magic of Darwinian process lies in the ability of<br />

the whole system to expand a local order to be spread all over the space and time and work out all together<br />

the exploring task of higher order. In the above numerical example, 10 trillion ALOs appeared and took<br />

part in the searching endeavor to arrive at the mutated local order of such quality.<br />

141<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Properties of two different kinds of orders<br />

We have demonstrated that the ‘secondary’ order produced by Darwinian mechanism is so enormous<br />

that it is practically impossible to encounter comparable order formed through more general Higgsian<br />

process. <strong>The</strong>refore, the two orders appear different in every respect, and look seemingly independent each<br />

other. But, as mentioned above, the secondary order is based only on a rich terrain of the primary order,<br />

and essentially inseparable from it. On the other hand, while the primary order is generally independent<br />

of the secondary one, it is also affected and continues to be altered once the formation of the secondary<br />

order is initiated. And this alteration of the primary order in turn affects the development of the secondary<br />

order, and so on and on. In this way the two orders are intermingled as a single undivided whole, once the<br />

secondary order gets started.<br />

Still, there are certain noticeable differences between the two orders. One of the characteristic differences<br />

arises in the relation between the part and whole. For the primary order, the order of the whole amounts<br />

roughly the sum of the orders of parts. For the secondary order, however, the order of the whole by far<br />

exceeds the sum of the orders attributed to the parts. This is another way of expressing the global character<br />

of the secondary order. Materially the system is composed of discernible composite partners, but the order<br />

of the system comes mainly from the relations between partners, rather than from the order of individual<br />

partners. In this sense, it is impossible for the secondary order to separate the system into independent<br />

parts. Once separated, the order is lost automatically. This is why we have called it ‘compound order’ in<br />

contrast to the ‘simple’ primary order.<br />

Another difference between the primary and secondary orders occurs in the stability of the order. Stability<br />

can be defined as the capability of maintaining the order of the system against external influences. It is, for<br />

instance, related to the ability of repairing externally imposed damages or perturbations.<br />

Primary orders, obtained through phase-transitions, chemical reactions, etc., adjusted by external<br />

conditions like temperature, are generally reversible and stable under external damage or perturbation.<br />

Meanwhile, the local orders accidentally obtained through fluctuation are generally unstable or metastable,<br />

but as we have seen such orders formed through Higgsian process are relatively poor. In many cases,<br />

such orders are initiated, maintained, and even accumulated by external flows. One interesting case is the<br />

one where the system arrives at the self-organized criticality. Any system arrived at this critical point will<br />

become unstable, and burst into many irregular fragments any time with relatively small triggering effect.<br />

Secondary orders, on the other hand, are generally located only in meta-stable states. While stable under<br />

normal perturbation, they may be destroyed by accidental impact exceeding certain threshold. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

142


orders, usually in the form of dynamic interrelations between coordinating partners, are vulnerable under<br />

internal as well as external fluctuation or perturbation.<br />

A model situation of the compound order<br />

To make the discussion more concrete, we will consider a model situation. Suppose that, by any chance,<br />

three kinds of components A, B, C are formed with certain densities of population in a large system.<br />

Assume now that the components A and B, being conjugate to each other, can properly be combined into<br />

a metastable state A*B, but it is, for some reason, very difficult to be achieved in normal circumstances.<br />

Assume also that A*B, once formed, can easily combine another component C into a more mature<br />

structure A*B*C, which can attract other A and B toward itself to facilitate the formation of another<br />

A*B and release it. This will make a model of ‘autocatalytic local order’(ALO), which could be formed<br />

accidentally against very low probability as a seed A*B, but once formed, grow into a mature body<br />

A*B*C and perform the autocatalytic activity producing another seed A*B.<br />

It should be noted here that all these phenomena are performed in highly dynamical and nonequilibrium<br />

circumstances. Accordingly, the components A, B, C here should not all be regarded as hard bodies with<br />

fixed material compositions. <strong>The</strong>y might include relatively rigid parts which could be regarded for some<br />

purposes as ‘constraints’, and also include flexible ones which, while maintaining reasonably distinct<br />

appearances, could be so fluid that they might even be regarded as a part of a steady flow, constantly<br />

exchanging their material compositions with surroundings. In this regard, the material identity of ALO,<br />

namely that of A*B and A*B*C, is not absolute. It constantly exchanges matter and energy, and maintains<br />

itself only in close coordination with the rest of the system. In this sense, it is an inseparable part of the<br />

system with conditional status of existence.<br />

By the same token, the production of the next generation, A*B, is not wholly the workings of A*B*C<br />

alone. It is in fact produced by the whole system, the ALO performing only the role of ‘catalyst’. That<br />

is why we prefer the wording ‘autocatalytic’, rather than more conventional ‘self-reproducing’ or ‘self-<br />

replicating’.<br />

Stages of compound order formation<br />

<strong>The</strong> appearance of ALO, which would initiate a new world of compound order, might not be easy to arise<br />

from the ‘simple’ primary order. <strong>The</strong> probability of the initiation of ALO will definitely depend on the<br />

richness of the primary order prior to the happening of this event. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is demanding to figure out<br />

a concrete circumstance which would facilitate the onset of such an event.<br />

143<br />

Session 2


A n*B n*C n} Nn). It is self-sufficient and self-sustaining in the sense that it requires nothing essential from<br />

outside.<br />

It is therefore the most comprehensive entity possessing every property the notion of life might possibly<br />

signify. It might perhaps be claimed that it is too comprehensive, including everything but discriminating<br />

too little. In certain sense, it is. It even looks counter-intuitive as a possible definition of life. But it should<br />

be noticed that it includes all the bare essentials, nothing more nothing less, for a life to be a life. Nothing<br />

less than this can be a life alone in the universe. <strong>The</strong> reason something less than this sometimes looks like<br />

a life is that we unwittingly assume the remaining part of this in existence somewhere around it. It is quite<br />

natural on earth, where all that essentials are somehow granted. But it would be completely different in<br />

somewhere else in the universe.<br />

Needless to say, this conception of life should not be arbitrarily extended to any unnecessary scope, say, to<br />

the universe itself. It should strictly be a scientific concept specifically denoting the causally interconnected<br />

bundle of matter necessitating the appearance of life within itself. This causal relations leading to the life<br />

phenomenon should be identified by our best available knowledge including contemporary science.<br />

To the best of present knowledge, such an entity is expected to be a rare phenomenon in the universe,<br />

and on the spatial dimension it is extremely localized, compared to the known scale of our universe. So<br />

far, only one such life is known, which is the one located on our solar system. Framed on the sun-earth<br />

system, it was born some 4 billion years ago, and has been growing ever since. It includes every living<br />

beings, living now and ever lived on earth, including ourselves and all our ancestors up to the very first<br />

ALO on earth. It also includes all the necessary components for this compound order possible, organic<br />

and inorganic, incorporated as a functioning whole.<br />

Some criteria for the concept of life<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is no doubt that, if an entity really deserves the name ‘life’, it would be the third entity mentioned<br />

above. But I have been reluctant to call it ‘life’ explicitly. Instead, I have called it ‘global life’ ever since<br />

I paid attention to this entity quite some time ago. 6 One reason for that is that it should be distinguished<br />

from the concept of ‘individual life’, in conjunction with which many interesting aspects of life can still be<br />

fruitfully discoursed.<br />

6 Hwe Ik Zhang, “<strong>The</strong> Units of Life: Global and Individual”, Paper presented at Philosophy of Science Conference in<br />

Dubrovnik, 1988. reprinted in Hwe Ik Zhang, Science and Meta-Science, HyonAmSa (2012). Also see Hwe Ik Zhang,<br />

“Humanity in the <strong>World</strong> of Life.” Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 24 (December, 1989): 447-56.<br />

147<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

At this juncture, I would present a verbal definition of (global) life employing terminologies closely<br />

analogous to that of Ruiz-Mirazo and Moreno: “Life is a self-sustained system embodying a complex<br />

network of autocatalytic local orders whose basic organization is specified by enduring material<br />

constraints which are generated through an open-ended evolutionary process”. Notice the similarity with<br />

that of Ruiz-Mirazo and Moreno except the notion of “a self-sustained system”, which indicates the body<br />

incorporating the primary order.<br />

To determine whether a concept is suitable to represent the idea of life, we can think of two possible<br />

criteria. One is the criterion of ‘liveliness’. This concerns whether the object is ‘alive by itself’ or not. A<br />

lily is alive in the field but it cannot be alive by itself. Once plucked out and thrown into the air it loses<br />

the liveliness. So lily by itself cannot represent the whole picture of life. It is only part of it. Same is the<br />

case for an animal species. An animal species cannot be alive by itself. It needs food and air. <strong>The</strong>n, what<br />

about the network definition of life provided by Ruiz-Mirazo and Moreno? It also fails. It cannot be alive<br />

without the supporting primary order. Only the global life can pass it. This is why the global life alone can<br />

be justified to represent the life in a genuine sense.<br />

Another criterion for an object to represent the idea of life is the criterion of death. If any entity can die,<br />

the usual interpretation is that it has a life which can be taken away. So the lily has a life. Same is true for<br />

an animal species, which can possibly be exterminated. Many objects that can die are, in fact, subsystems<br />

within a larger living system. <strong>The</strong>se subsystems have such a characteristic that they can die without regard<br />

to the enclosing larger life but they cannot be alive without it. In other words, they pass the criterion of<br />

death, but do not fully satisfy the criterion of liveliness. For such case, it is quite appropriate to bestow<br />

the status of ‘conditional life’. All sorts of ‘individual life’ defined above occupy the ontological status of<br />

conditional life.<br />

Gaia, global life and self-organized criticality<br />

One of the interesting features of the compound order, i. e. the global life, is that the whole system might<br />

have been in a state of self-organized criticality (SOC). Per Bak, who initiated the theory of SOC, asserts:<br />

In the critical state the collection of species represents a single coherent organism following its<br />

own evolutionary dynamics. A single triggering event can cause an arbitrarily large fraction of the<br />

ecological network to collapse, and eventually be replaced by a new stable ecological network.<br />

This would be a “mutated” global organism. At the critical point all species influence each other.<br />

In this state they act collectively as a single meta-organism, many sharing the same fate. This<br />

is highlighted by the very existence of large-scale extinctions. A meteorite might have directly<br />

148


impacted a small part of the organism, but a large fraction of the organism eventually died as a<br />

result.<br />

Within the SOC picture, the entire ecology has evolved into the critical state. It makes no sense to<br />

view the evolution of individual species independently. 7<br />

<strong>The</strong> global organism mentioned by Bak above is Gaia of Lovelock, which can roughly be interpreted as<br />

the ‘body of global life’. In this sense, the Gaia theory of Lovelock provides some important aspects of the<br />

‘physiology’ of global life.<br />

<strong>The</strong> arrival of SOC in global life is manifested in model simulations performed by Bak, and confirmed in<br />

reality by careful examination of immense fossil records by Sepkoski 8 and others. This SOC in global life,<br />

as suggested in the above quotation, has two major implications.<br />

Firstly, the network of species in the global life is so intensively connected that the whole system behaves<br />

as a single organism and may even collapse as a single entity. This feature, by emphasizing the unity of<br />

global life, greatly reinforces the conceptual scheme upon which the ontological status of global life is<br />

based. Secondly, the SOC in global life strongly indicates the fragility of the global organism. According<br />

to the characteristic property of SOC, a minor impact or unbalance in the system may trigger a major<br />

catastrophe.<br />

Other than the idea of Gaia, the concept of global life has been raised by some authors without a specific<br />

name for it. Margulis and Sagan, for instance, characterized life in a way remarkably similar to global life:<br />

So, what is life? Life is planetary exuberance, a solar phenomenon. It is the astronomically<br />

local transmutation of Earth’s air, water, and sun into cells. It is an intricate pattern of growth<br />

and death, dispatch and retrenchment, transformation and decay. Life is the single expanding<br />

organization connected through Darwinian time to the first bacteria and through Vernadskian space<br />

to all citizens of biosphere. Life as God and music and carbon and energy is a whirling nexus of<br />

growing, fusing, and dying beings. It is matter gone wild, capable of choosing its own direction in<br />

order to indefinitely forestall the inevitable moment of thermodynamic equilibrium-death. Life is<br />

also a question the universe poses to itself in the form of a human being. 9<br />

7 Per Bak, How nature works: the science of self-organized criticality (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996) Chapter 8.<br />

8 J. J. Jr. Sepkoski, “Ten Years in the Library: New Data confirm Paleontological Patterns.” Paleobiology 19 (1993) 43.<br />

9 Lynn Margulis and Dorion Sagan, What is life (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1995), p. 49.<br />

149<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Compound order and intelligence<br />

<strong>The</strong> last passage in the above quotation is intriguing. How can life be a ‘question’ and impose it to itself?<br />

<strong>The</strong> life discussed so far is strictly composed of material bodies, however large and complicated it might<br />

be. Is it then possible such a mental attribute like a ‘question’ be raised out of this monster?<br />

To appreciate this, consider an analogous situation. Computers are simple material objects in every<br />

respect, but somehow perform fairly sophisticated mental tasks. <strong>The</strong> software, usually addressed in<br />

contrast to the hardware, is not a distinct physical body but an alternative depiction of the same object.<br />

One depiction may be called as the inner aspect and the other as the outer aspect of the same subject<br />

matter.<br />

A partner in a highly advanced compound order should, for the sake of maintaining this order, coordinate<br />

with other partners in a very close and delicate manner, and accordingly, develop a sophisticated<br />

dynamical mechanism for this coordination. This mechanism, at the standpoint of that partner, includes<br />

anticipatory readiness concerning the next move of other partners.<br />

Here comes a real surprise for this compound order. That partner, so far regarded as a material body, turns<br />

out to be a mental subject as well. In fact, all the mental activities performed by any subject, including<br />

mine and yours, are of this nature. <strong>The</strong> mentality and the physicality are not two distinct substances but<br />

just two modes of the same substance, one the subjective or inner mode, and the other the physical or<br />

outer mode.<br />

It is sometimes possible to translate any item in one mode to that of the other. For instance, the<br />

organization and motion in the physical mode are translated into the intelligence and behavior in the<br />

mental mode. For a close coordination with other partners, the mental subject needs a cute intelligence and<br />

intellectual activities. In this sense, ‘knowledge’ and ‘information’ are understood as necessary devices<br />

of cooperation, expressed in the mental mode, between subunits within the whole system of compound<br />

order.<br />

One of the interesting feats in this regard is that the ‘knowledge’ is flexible enough even to pose a ‘question’<br />

in it. Normally the questions are answered by newly acquired information, but the process may continue<br />

to raise ever deeper questions. All these workings are an inherent property of nature, more specifically,<br />

of the compound order formed in it. In other words, the nature, or the universe, poses questions to itself<br />

through the frame of compound order, which is the life itself.<br />

150


Does it mean that ‘life’ is “a question the universe poses to itself in the form of a human being,” as<br />

Margulis and Sagan assert enigmatically in the above quotation? To answer this question, we have to<br />

consider the possible meaning of human being in the frame of global life.<br />

Human being and the self-conscious global life<br />

If there remains a real mystery, probably irresolvable by advanced science, it is the subjectivity seemingly<br />

embodied in compound order. Any partner in the global life can be in the subjective mode, but can be<br />

depicted outwardly only in the objective mode. Both modes of existence are so familiar to us, in fact, that<br />

we seldom feel problematic about it. As a thinking and cognitive subject, we are already in our subjective<br />

mode, while the objects we recognize are in their objective mode. But the fact that objects are recognized<br />

in the objective mode does not necessarily mean that all the descriptions are made in physical terms. Many<br />

of the physical signals from objects may readily be interpreted and translated into more familiar mental<br />

terms.<br />

We can readily recognize and accept that other partners in many cases are in their subjective mode distinct<br />

from mine. But, interesting enough, it is also possible to have inter-subjective connections to form a<br />

collective subjectivity. <strong>The</strong> partner can not only be ‘you’ but also be included in ‘we,’ which means, within<br />

‘my’ subjective mode. <strong>The</strong> usual communications are familiar means making such connections possible.<br />

<strong>The</strong> human being, in the individual as well as the collective sense, is part of the global life. And like all<br />

other plants and animals, human acts as a partner in the global life and coordinates closely with others to<br />

maintain the compound order. Further, like all other partners, it can be in its subjective mode inwardly,<br />

and can be depicted in the objective mode outwardly. In this regard, human is not quite different from<br />

any other partners in the global life. If there is a difference, it seems to be a matter of degree rather than a<br />

matter of substance.<br />

But we find that there is an unbridgeable gap between being a human and being any other partner in<br />

this global life. It relates to the fact that the presently operating subjective mode, in which you and I are<br />

involved in this discussion, is none other than the human subjective mode. <strong>The</strong>re is no way to escape from<br />

this fate once involved in the presently operating subjective mode. It is the fundamental attribute of the<br />

subjectivity itself. Once in it, no way otherwise. We can of course extend our subjectivity to include as<br />

many contents as the connections make it possible, but still it is extended ‘I’. Moreover, it seems that there<br />

is no non-human subjective mode operating in a comparable degree to our present one. In other words, we<br />

have no ‘You’ to call and listen to.<br />

151<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

<strong>The</strong> only way we can proceed in our present subjective mode is to expend it. We, human being, need<br />

intelligence and perform mental activity as a partner in the global life to coordinate with all the other<br />

ones in it. That is the normal exercise of our intelligence and we are all familiar with it. But once we<br />

understand, or somehow feel, that the other partners are in fact part of the undividable whole, the global<br />

life, which can be regarded as an extended body of myself, then all these activities can be construed as<br />

something similar to our inner mental activities of self coordination within a single human body.<br />

We would then be in the subjective mode of the global life, the global self. We would feel pain if trouble<br />

is noticed anywhere in our global life, and would react, if judged necessary. Human being, as far as it is<br />

instrumental for the global self, occupies a special position in the global life. This is a position analogous<br />

to the brain or the ‘central nervous system’ in the human body. Indeed, there is a division of labor in the<br />

body of the global life: some species specialize in transforming solar energy into nutritious chemicals, and<br />

others in decomposing trashes into usable materials. What would then the specialty of human species be<br />

other than the intellectual and mental activities?<br />

Can the global life, as a whole, be qualified as a bona fide mental subject? Some controversies might arise<br />

on this matter. But as far as subjectivity is concerned, the clearest evidence is the subjective claim itself. If<br />

someone, whether the human being or not, explicitly claims that he or she identifies himself or herself as<br />

the global life in his or her mind, who could deny it? Obviously, we know that the life we are subjectively<br />

engaging is the undivided whole, the global life, and then who are we, other than the global life itself?<br />

Interestingly, this self-identification with the global life is not a novel phenomenon. Many sages and<br />

intellectuals of all age identified themselves with something very much like the global life.<br />

Tragic irony encountered on the global life<br />

It is now possible to claim that our global life has finally become a self-conscious being, since at least<br />

some conscious beings identifying themselves as the global life appeared. Indeed, the consciousness of<br />

the global life, if such be granted, would be the collective human consciousness which identifies itself as<br />

such.<br />

Once we accept this, it would be an event of cosmic significance. Our global life, born some four billion<br />

years ago, has grown to be of certain maturity, but until very recently it has been unconscious of itself<br />

just like a person in a vegetative existence. But now, through the human collective intelligence, it finally<br />

becomes conscious of itself. <strong>The</strong> consciousness within an individual person is marvellous enough, never<br />

easily imaginable on the basis of physical understanding, but the newly emerging global consciousness<br />

is even more marvellous and promising, opening a whole new era for the global life with the blessing of<br />

152


unprecedented mental upheaval.<br />

Unfortunately, however, this is not the whole picture. Human beings have a tendency to severely distort<br />

the normal physiology of the global life, and even to extinguish it. This behavior of human beings<br />

to the global life is comparable to that of cancer cells to the host organism. Cancer cells themselves<br />

are not external agencies invading the host body, but just part of it. <strong>The</strong>y simply multiply themselves<br />

uncontrollably, interrupting the normal functioning of the host organism, and eventually leading to<br />

the demise of it. Human beings, like cancer cells, have colonized substantial part of the global life,<br />

transforming it for the sake of their own prosperity and multiplication.<br />

It would then be a tragic irony that the global life, some four billion years after its birth, finally becomes<br />

intellectual and self-conscious only to find itself cancerously diseased by the same agent which makes it<br />

possible to be a conscious being.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n, what is the reason why such a marvellous intellectual being like human can become such a<br />

cancerous being in the global life? One clue can be traced to the prevailing rather narrow conception of<br />

‘life’. No sane person would gladly continue his business if he realizes that what he is doing is the very<br />

thing a cancerous cell is doing on his own body.<br />

But, for ordinary people, in their everyday business, it is seldom necessary or even possible to imagine<br />

the whole picture of the global life. <strong>The</strong>y normally focus their attention on each single local order, and<br />

designate a notion of ‘life’ to its active mode. This notion of life serves to protect and provide means for<br />

the maintenance of a local order, which is of course vitally important for our normal life. This notion<br />

of life is, in fact, so accustomed to people that they are virtually enslaved by this conception. <strong>The</strong>re are,<br />

however, costs to pay for this. First of all, it makes them fail to see the real dimension of life, vainly<br />

seeking its essence in the local order, namely, the individual living body. This makes them misjudge the<br />

value associated with life: overestimating the value associated with individuals while failing to see the real<br />

value the global life deserves.<br />

How can the harmony between human and nature be achieved?<br />

As every other species, the survival instinct of the human being is engraved on its genetic information.<br />

This instinct is naturally of two kinds. One is the preservation and multiplication of the individual self and<br />

the other is the cooperation with and conservation of the rest of the global life. Otherwise, the subsistence<br />

of the species would be endangered. But the balance between those two opposing tendencies may not<br />

always be sustained in an ideal position. As human civilization developed, it turned out that the instinct<br />

153<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

engraved on the gene is not sufficient, because certain extra need of cooperation arises. <strong>The</strong> social laws<br />

and morality are one form of the cultural devices to amend the balance toward the cooperation and<br />

conservation.<br />

This amendment of balance, however, can be achieved more naturally by other means, namely, the<br />

acquirement of a higher self-identity, like a family, a community or a nation. With such a new self-identity,<br />

it is necessary only to invoke the instinct of self-preservation and make it directed toward the acquired<br />

higher order self. Human beings somehow possess the ability to shift inclination even by the mental<br />

manipulation of artificial self-identity. This tendency is most clearly demonstrated in the phenomena like<br />

sports. Once they take sides to one party (the artificial self), then there naturally appears the favoring<br />

tendency toward that direction. It is therefore expected that once they understand themselves as members<br />

of a ‘human family’, certain collective self-identity would appear, and this might solve many ethical<br />

problems within the human society. We can of course go one step further, and identify ourselves with the<br />

global life. This ultimate self-identity, regarding the global life as one’s own body, would help greatly to<br />

solve the global predicament mentioned above.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is, however, another problem which should be engaged by human being. It is the fundamental<br />

fragility the global life inherited within its compositional structure. As we have mentioned earlier, the<br />

global life is located at the point of self-organized criticality (SOC); by its characteristic property, a minor<br />

impact or unbalance may trigger a major catastrophe. But we should notice that, while it is a phenomenon<br />

of the global scale which should be understood from the global property of the entire system, it is<br />

fundamentally based on local interactions between the components which compose the system. <strong>The</strong>refore,<br />

although the statistical character of the global phenomena remains unaffected, the local situation may be<br />

changed by inner maneuver of the participant agencies. For instance, whether a portion of the global life<br />

including the human species would be destroyed, or some other remote portion of it would get the tragedy,<br />

may depend on the local situation for which certain intelligent maneuvering is possible.<br />

Undoubtedly, human is the only being in charge of this. His intelligence as well as his mind is critical on<br />

this matter. Less than wisest judgment might trigger the demise of the human race and the most precious<br />

part of the global life.<br />

In summary, the relation between human and nature is not a relation between two independent agencies,<br />

but between two parts of a single living body, the global life, just like the relation between the brain and<br />

the remaining part of the body. <strong>The</strong> harmony between human and nature should, therefore, be the harmony<br />

between the brain and the remaining body, as well as the harmony between mental and physical activities.<br />

If the harmony between the human and nature is in danger, it means that the physical and mental health<br />

154


of the global life is in jeopardy. <strong>The</strong>refore, the most urgent task is to provide a whole new vision of life, in<br />

which the physiology and the possible malady of it should be understood and properly be diagnosed. <strong>The</strong><br />

new forms of harmony between human and nature should then be explored and established on the basis of<br />

such endeavor.<br />

References<br />

Per Bak, How nature works: the science of self-organized criticality (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996).<br />

Michael Boulter, Extinction: Evolution and the End of Man (New York: Columbia University Press,<br />

2002).<br />

Brian Greene, <strong>The</strong> Fabric of the Cosmos (New York: Knopf, 2004).<br />

Lynn Margulis and Dorion Sagan, What is life (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1995).<br />

Kapa Ruiz-Mirazo and Alvaro Moreno, “<strong>The</strong> Need for a Universal Definition of Life in Twenty-first-<br />

century Biology” in Information and Living systems - Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives,<br />

edited by Georgy Terzis and Robert Arp (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2011).<br />

Ed Regis, What is Life (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).<br />

J. J. Jr. Sepkoski, “Ten Years in the Library: New Data confirm Paleontological Patterns”. Paleobiology 19<br />

(1993), 43.<br />

Hwe Ik Zhang, “<strong>The</strong> Units of Life: Global and Individual”, Paper presented at Philosophy of Science<br />

Conference in Dubrovnik, 1988. reprinted in Hwe Ik Zhang, Science and Meta-Science, HyonAmSa<br />

(2012).<br />

Hwe Ik Zhang, “Humanity in the <strong>World</strong> of Life.” Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 24 (December,<br />

1989), 447-56.<br />

155<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Becoming the Alien: Avatar and District 9<br />

Andrew M. Gordon<br />

University of Florida<br />

<strong>The</strong> recent science fiction films Avatar (2009) and District 9 (2009) deal with similar themes: the abuse<br />

of advanced technology to despoil the environment and to oppress and slaughter minority populations.<br />

Although both are fantasies set in the future, they are also relevant to contemporary environmental and<br />

racial conflicts. And Avatar and District 9 have similar plots: the protagonist, a member of the white<br />

oppressors, is sent to aid in the displacement of aliens from their homes. In both cases, the minority<br />

groups are the most alien beings possible: an extraterrestrial species. In the course of the narrative, the<br />

heroes are first physically and then psychologically transformed, taking on first the biological form and<br />

then the psychology of the alien race. Gradually, the hero crosses over and ends up leading the alien<br />

rebellion against the white imperialists. Both heroes are treated as race traitors and marked for death, yet<br />

both survive and aid the alien groups they have joined. In both films, becoming an alien, both physically<br />

and mentally, is envisioned as a radical form of healing from the sickness of human civilization. As<br />

Neill Blomkamp, the director and co-writer of District 9, says, “As he [the hero] becomes more alien, he<br />

becomes more human” (Blomkamp 2009).<br />

As a critic mentions, Avatar and District 9 are a continuation of white guilt fantasies in the movies. For<br />

the most part, in such movies we don’t see the aliens through their own eyes but through white eyes, and<br />

“whites still get to be leaders of the natives - just in a kinder, gentler way” (Newitz). Avatar and District<br />

9 are conversion narratives, cures for the disease of whiteness, part of a nearly century-long tradition<br />

in film, the myth of the white male hero who “goes native,” seen, for example, in the various cinematic<br />

retellings of Mutiny on the Bounty (1935, 1962, and 1984) and the tremendously popular western,<br />

Dances with Wolves (1990) (Vera and Gordon 2003, 67-83, 137-42). In such films, the hero begins as a<br />

colonial oppressor. He must be cured by prolonged separation from Western civilization, converted from<br />

imperialist to anti-imperialist by being inducted into a native tribe. In Mutiny on the Bounty, English sailor<br />

Fletcher Christian is seduced by a Pacific island paradise, a happy tribe, and a beautiful native maiden. He<br />

finally refuses to return home and leads his shipmates in a rebellion against the tyrannical Captain Bligh.<br />

156


In Dances with Wolves, Lieutenant John Dunbar, a Union soldier wounded in the American Civil War,<br />

goes to the western frontier at the time of the Indian wars. <strong>The</strong>re he is seduced by the paradise of the wide<br />

open plains, the noble savages of the Lakota Sioux, and a beautiful maiden (born white but raised by the<br />

Sioux). He renounces his white identity, takes the Indian name “Dances with Wolves,” refuses to return<br />

home, and leads his tribe against the U.S. cavalry.<br />

Avatar might be subtitled “Dances with Aliens” (Gordon and Vera 2009). In Avatar, the Marine Jake<br />

Sully lost the use of his legs in a future war and is offered a second chance on the distant moon Pandora,<br />

operating by remote control an avatar, a replica of one of the humanoid natives. <strong>The</strong>re he is seduced by<br />

the paradise of a wild forest, a tribe of noble savages and a beautiful native princess. Ultimately, he refuses<br />

to return to Earth and leads the tribe in rebellion against their colonial oppressors, who are out to level the<br />

forest and force the natives from their homes.<br />

In contrast to these previous films, however, District 9 radically revises the cinematic myth of the hero<br />

who goes native. One critic defines Avatar as a liberal narrative and District 9 as a radical one (Reider<br />

2011). District 9 rejects the persistent strain of romantic mythology in the previous dramas about “going<br />

native.” <strong>The</strong> protagonist Wikus is at first made deliberately unsympathetic, neither a respected naval<br />

officer like Fletcher Christian nor a wounded warrior like John Dunbar or Jake Sully but a smug, petty<br />

bureaucrat in charge of the eviction of the extraterrestrial “Prawn” from a Johannesburg, South Africa<br />

slum. <strong>The</strong> Prawn are not handsome, noble savages but insectoid aliens, a hive rather than a tribe. <strong>The</strong>ir<br />

environment is not a paradise but a slum into which they have been forced. <strong>The</strong>re is no beautiful native<br />

princess; in fact, the hero acutely misses his human wife. Most significant, the transformation of Wikus is<br />

neither willed nor witting but accidental and involuntary, triggered by exposure to an alien chemical that<br />

alters him biologically into one of the Prawn. District 9 is a highly ironic tale about an anti-hero, a hero in<br />

spite of himself, a movie with strong elements of body horror, black comedy and political satire. It offers a<br />

scathing critique of the ills of contemporary civilization and a radical cure.<br />

<strong>The</strong> transformation of Jake Sully in Avatar from a white Earthman to an alien warrior on a distant planet<br />

is structured as a myth of the birth of a hero. Many popular science fiction and fantasy film series are<br />

myths about the coming of a messiah, a superhero who will liberate the city, the world, or the galaxy from<br />

the forces of evil: Superman, Batman, Spiderman, Star Wars, <strong>The</strong> Teminator, Harry Potter, <strong>The</strong> Matrix,<br />

or Avatar. Otto Rank argues that, like paranoid delusions, the hero myth is egotistical, “merely the means<br />

for his own exaltation” (Rank 1959, 94). Often this mythic hero has a dual identity: an everyday identity<br />

as Clark Kent or Jake Sully, versus a superhero identity as Superman, or, in Avatar, “Toruk Macto.”<br />

Sometimes the hero shuttles between two worlds and suffers a confusion between two identities, or he<br />

must symbolically die in order to be reborn into the heroic identity, as in <strong>The</strong> Matrix and Avatar.<br />

157<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Avatar is set in a dystopian future in which the Earth is a dying planet and has begun to colonize other<br />

planets in search of land and resources. Jake is torn between two worlds—a real world and a kind of<br />

dream world—and two identities: his real world identity and his avatar self in the dream world. His<br />

ordinary identity is Jake Sully, a white man from Earth, an ex-Marine Corporal in a wheelchair. But his<br />

superhero identity in the dream world is that of his avatar, which has the appearance of one of the Na’vi,<br />

a ten-foot tall, blue-skinned native. In the lush forests of Pandora, Jake has full use of his legs and is swift<br />

and powerful.<br />

<strong>The</strong> distinction between the two worlds is likened to the difference between waking and dreaming. Jake<br />

says in the opening, voice-over narration, “When I was lying there in the VA [military veterans’] hospital<br />

with a big hole blown through the middle of my life, I started having these dreams of flying. I was free.<br />

Sooner or later, though, you always have to wake up.” Yet the apparently dream images that accompany<br />

this opening narration—of swooping through clouds and over lush green forests—are prescient, for Jake<br />

will later experience these same views in reality on Pandora when he is transformed from a human into an<br />

extraterrestrial and learns to fly a banshee.<br />

To emphasize the distinction between the real and the dream worlds, Avatar references the film <strong>The</strong><br />

Wizard of Oz. Colonel Quaritch tells the mercenaries newly arrived on Pandora, “You’re not in Kansas<br />

anymore,” alluding to Dorothy’s line when she arrives in Oz. Pandora has some of the same scary,<br />

beautiful, overwhelming potential as the dream world of Oz. Just as Dorothy can realize herself in Oz, so<br />

Jake can realize his true, heroic self on Pandora.<br />

Throughout the film, the images of dreaming and waking are connected with repeated images of sight and<br />

of death and rebirth. <strong>The</strong> film begins with Jake awakening in a capsule after almost six years in cryogenic<br />

suspension on the journey from Earth. Right after Jake says, “you always have to wake up,” there is a<br />

close up of Jake’s eye opening, an image which will be echoed in the film’s closing image of the eye of<br />

Jake’s avatar opening. He says, “In cryo, you don’t dream at all.” When the capsule opens, and Jake floats<br />

out in zero gravity, it is if he is being reborn from a tomb or womb.<br />

Continuing the motif of death and rebirth, as the ship descends into Pandora’s atmosphere, Jake flashes<br />

back to his twin brother Tommy’s cremation, and he says, “One life ends. Another begins.” Tommy’s<br />

death means a new life for Jake, who will take his brother’s place on Pandora. And the film ends as Jake<br />

lets his human body die so that he may live permanently in his alien body. In both the opening and the<br />

closing scenes, “One life ends. Another begins.” Jake’s last line in the film is “It’s my birthday, after all.”<br />

In Avatar, the hero must be reborn and grow up anew so he can become the messiah of this new world.<br />

Jake finds himself in his new avatar body, alone and lost in the forest at night, threatened by wild animals,<br />

158


only to be rescued by the beautiful native princess Neytiri, who tells him, “You are like a baby…. No fear.<br />

But stupid! Ignorant like a child!” Neytiri becomes the mentor/mother/lover figure who will help him to<br />

grow up.<br />

At the opening of the film, Jake still defines himself as a Marine, even though he is a disabled vet. He says,<br />

“<strong>The</strong>re’s no such thing as an ex-Marine. You may be out, but you never lose the attitude. I told myself I<br />

could pass any test a man could pass.” But, as a Marine, he feels inferior to his twin brother Tommy: “Yeah,<br />

Tommy was the scientist. Me, I’m just another dumb grunt going someplace he’s gonna regret.”<br />

Jake has money problems. Of his paralysis, he says, “<strong>The</strong>y can fix a spinal, if you got the money. But not<br />

on vet benefits. Not in this economy,” suggesting the unfairness of this technologically advanced future.<br />

He takes the place of his dead twin as an avatar operator because, as a disabled veteran, it’s the best and<br />

perhaps the only offer he has. As the company tells him, “It’d be a fresh start. On a new world. And<br />

the pay is good. Very good.” He has contempt for the thief who killed his brother “for the paper in his<br />

wallet” and contempt for his fellow ex-soldiers on Pandora: “Back on Earth, these guys were Army dogs,<br />

Marines, fighting for freedom. But out here, they’re just hired guns, taking the money, working for the<br />

company.” Ironically, Jake is in the same position, taking the money and working for the company.<br />

<strong>The</strong> nameless corporation for which Jake works is only interested in money. Parker Selfridge, the<br />

company representative on Pandora, tells the scientist Grace Augustine, who is in charge of the Avatar<br />

program, “This is why we’re here: unobtainium. Because this little rock sells for $20 million a kilo.” To<br />

Selfridge, the Avatar program is “a little puppet show”; to the mercenary commander Col. Quaritch, it is<br />

“a bad joke.” <strong>The</strong>y tolerate the program only because the natives are living on top of one of the richest<br />

deposits of the precious mineral, and the company is looking for a diplomatic way to force them to<br />

resettle.<br />

Although he believes that he could “pass any test a man could pass,” Jake quickly accepts the deal offered<br />

by Col. Quaritch, who represents the bad father. Quaritch, a fellow ex-Marine, flatters Jake’s military<br />

accomplishments when almost everyone on Pandora rejects him: his fellow soldiers look down on him<br />

as a useless cripple, “meals on wheels,” and the scientists with whom he works consider him a “jarhead<br />

dropout,” not a brilliant scientist like his dead brother. Quaritch, however, calls Jake “son,” treats him like<br />

a Marine under his command, and promises him newly functioning legs when he returns to Earth, saying,<br />

“Son, I take care of my own.” He needs a man on the inside he can control, a Marine “in an Avatar body....<br />

I want you to learn these savages from the inside. I want you to gain their trust. I want to know how to<br />

force their cooperation or hammer them hard if they won’t.” So, out of mixed motives—“Semper Fi”<br />

loyalty to his Marine identity and to the commandant, along with a desire to be made whole again—Jake<br />

159<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

becomes a spy.<br />

Jake’s compromise means he begins his mission with divided loyalties: Is he working for the good<br />

mother Grace, a botanist who respects Pandoran ecology and Na’vi culture? Or is he a traitor working<br />

for the bad father Quaritch, who treats the Na’vi like Custer treated the Indians? Later Jake also becomes<br />

split between his human identity as a Marine from Earth, and his alien identity as a Na’vi warrior.<br />

Jake’s movement between the two worlds later creates in him inability to decide which is the real world<br />

and which the dream world, and a resultant confusion of identity. Not until Jake resolves this identity<br />

confusion can he attain his predestined status as “Toruk Macto,” the mythic savior of the Na’vi. Neytiri<br />

tells him that “Toruk Macto” means “rider of the last shadow, the great bird…. Toruk Macto is mighty: he<br />

brought the clans together in a time of great sorrow.”<br />

Jake’s transformation from human to alien is gradual and goes through many stages. <strong>The</strong> first turning<br />

point occurs in the comic scene when he first operates his alien avatar. <strong>The</strong> awkward Jake towers over<br />

the humans in his alien body, has a long, waving tail, and is wearing only an embarrassing hospital gown<br />

open in back. He is so overexcited at regaining the use of his legs that he starts to run through the camp,<br />

faster and faster. When he stops, he wiggles his toes in the dirt—a simple pleasure which had been denied<br />

him for years as a paraplegic. This is the beginning of the freedom of which Jake had been dreaming in<br />

the hospital.<br />

He may have the alien body, but he knows nothing about the alien environment. On his first expedition<br />

with the science team, he flees a huge predator, gets lost in the woods, and tries to survive the night while<br />

surrounded by a pack of ferocious, hungry beasts. After Neytiri rescues him, he thanks her and asks her to<br />

teach him, but she rejects him: “You are like a baby making noise, don’t know what to do…. You should<br />

not be here. Go back.”<br />

At this point, fortuitously, Jake’s body becomes covered by floating luminous plants, “seeds of the sacred<br />

tree—very pure spirits,” which Neytiri takes as “a sign” from the goddess Eywa that Jake himself is a pure<br />

spirit. So she brings him home to her clan. This is the second major turning point in Jake’s transformation,<br />

and the first sign that he is destined to be the chosen one.<br />

Her father Eytukan, the clan leader, says Jake is “the first warrior dreamwalker we have seen.” To call the<br />

avatars “dreamwalkers” implies that they are somnambulists: they lie in capsules like coffins and seem<br />

asleep (or dead), and yet at the same time they walk around in false bodies. So Eytukan orders Neytiri<br />

to “teach him to speak and walk as we do,” so that he will no longer be a sleepwalker but awake like the<br />

Na’vi. So begins the next part of his transformation, his training by Neytiri, which leads ultimately to his<br />

160


initiation into the tribe.<br />

At first, Jake is clumsy and they mock him. But he learns quickly, saying, “With Neytiri, it’s learn fast or<br />

die.” And he grows stronger: “My feet are getting tougher. I can run farther every day. I can trust my body<br />

to know what to do.”<br />

But Jake still does not fully understand or respect the Na’vi nature worship. He tells Grace that Neytiri is<br />

“always going on about the flow of energy, spirits of animals. I really hope this tree-hugger crap isn’t on<br />

the final.” Grace urges him to “try to see the forest through her eyes.”<br />

Jake’s third turning point, a major step in his acceptance into the clan, happens when he tames and flies a<br />

great bird. On his first flight, Jake experiences again the exhilaration of his first run with his new legs, a<br />

feeling underscored by swooping camera movement and soaring music. Now he is living his dreams of<br />

flying and feels truly free: “I was a stone cold aerial killer; death from above.”<br />

Jake now spends more and more time in his avatar body and neglects his human body, rarely bothering to<br />

eat, sleep, bathe, or shave. But he is growing increasingly confused about his identity. In his video log, he<br />

says, “Everything is backwards now. Like out there [among the Na’vi] is the true world and in here is the<br />

dream. It’s hard to believe it’s only been three months. I don’t know who I am anymore.” When Quaritch<br />

tells him that his work is over and he can leave that night for Earth, Jake stalls for more time to go through<br />

the tribal initiation ceremony. He no longer really wants to go home and give up his wonderful new life.<br />

He wants to become an alien, to be “one of them.”<br />

Jake’s voice-over narration at the initiation ceremony continues the motif of rebirth: “<strong>The</strong> Na’vi say that<br />

every person is born twice. <strong>The</strong> second time is when you earn your place among the people—forever.”<br />

Soon after this, he mates with Neytiri.<br />

At that point, things rapidly worsen. Jake stops a bulldozer from leveling the forest, rebelling against the<br />

company and showing his changed identity. He tries to warn the clan, “Do not attack the Sky People.<br />

Many Omaticaya will die,” but the warrior Tsu’tey will not listen. Quaritch cuts Jake’s connection with<br />

his avatar and slugs him, saying, “You found yourself some local tail and you just forget what team you’re<br />

playing for?” Later, when he confronts Jake in the climactic battle, he accuses him of being a race traitor:<br />

“Hey, Sully, how does it feel to betray your own race? You think you’re one of them? Time to wake up”<br />

(my emphasis).<br />

Jake and Grace fail to persuade the people to evacuate, and Quaritch and his helicopters attack with tear<br />

161<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

gas and incendiaries. When Home Tree burns and falls, it evokes 9/11. When her father dies in the attack,<br />

Neytiri rejects Jake as a betrayer. Repeating what has become a refrain, Jake narrates: “I was a warrior<br />

who dreamed he could bring peace. Sooner or later, though, you have to wake up” (my emphasis).<br />

When Jake next returns to his avatar body, he finds himself alone in the burned forest: “Outcast. Betrayer.<br />

Alien. I was in the place the eye does not see.” When he says “alien,” he means “human”; at this point,<br />

the usual meaning of the terms has been reversed, just as the waking life and the dream life have been<br />

reversed. Outcast, with nothing else to lose, Jake tames the giant bird, flies back to the clan as Toruk<br />

Macto, the messiah, and they fall to their knees in awe. It is the only way he can return and unite the clans<br />

to defeat the company.<br />

<strong>The</strong> climactic battle is reminiscent of the fight of the Ewoks against the Imperial Stormtroopers in Return<br />

of the Jedi (1983): primitive forest dwellers use ingenuity and knowledge of the environment to defeat an<br />

opposing force possessing overwhelming technological superiority. In Avatar, Mother Nature takes her<br />

revenge, as even the beasts of the forest and the birds of the sky attack the invading Earthmen. Neytiri<br />

kills Quaritch by piercing his body with arrows. <strong>The</strong>n, in a Pietá image, she cradles Jake’s human body in<br />

her huge arms and revives him with an oxygen mask.<br />

Aside from the death of the villain, the bad father, Jake also has a rival who must be eliminated. As Otto<br />

Rank writes, the mythological hero’s doubles “are shadowy brothers who, like the twin brother, must die<br />

for the hero’s sake” (Rank 1959, 90). In Avatar, the hero’s twin brother dies so that Jake can be reborn, no<br />

longer disabled, and become the messiah.<br />

Later Jake faces another rival in Tsu’tey, the chief warrior and next head of the clan, his rival for the<br />

love of Neytiri, and the man who dismisses Jake from the tribe. Although Tsu’tey allies with him when<br />

Jake becomes Toruk Macto, Tsu’tey is killed in the climactic battle. In the mythic pattern, not only the<br />

evil father figure but all the hero’s doubles, brothers, or rivals must be eliminated for him to become the<br />

messiah.<br />

That Jake is crippled is in line with other disabled mythical heroes, such as Oedipus, whose name means<br />

“swollen foot.” Otto Rank suggests that “the physical defects of certain heroes” is a means by which “the<br />

reproaches of the father for possible defects or shortcomings are incorporated into the myth[…] the hero<br />

being endowed with the same weakness which burdens the self-respect of the individual” (Rank 1959,<br />

92).<br />

<strong>The</strong> villains in both Avatar and District 9—Col. Quaritch and Col. Koobus—are similar characters:<br />

162


despicable racists whom the hero must finally confront in a duel to the death. As critics note, the Marine<br />

commander Quaritch is “hyper-masculine…. one dimensional, exaggerated” (Reider 2011, 46). He is<br />

a cartoon villain, a ruthless, trained killer. Quaritch has a dragon painted on the cockpit of his attack<br />

helicopter, and his code name in battle is “Papa Dragon.” Ironically, Jake resembles Quaritch: both are<br />

tough, wounded Marines who show no fear, and in the final battle, Jake rides a flying dragon (Fore 2011).<br />

Quaritch is not Jake’s double but an evil father figure, possessing Jake’s potential but turned to destruction.<br />

Although Quaritch is in certain respects admirable—fearless, determined, and hard to kill—he is a racist<br />

villain. He echoes George W. Bush, saying, “Our only security lies in pre-emptive attack. We will fight<br />

terror with terror.” A fascist, he stands in for the patriarchy, a “scapegoat for capitalism and colonialism”<br />

who must suffer “spectacularly violent punishment” (Rieder 2011, 46).<br />

In contrast, the Na’vi is a matriarchal society. <strong>The</strong>ir goddess, Eywa, is associated with Mother Nature,<br />

which they venerate, whereas Jake says of Earth: “<strong>The</strong>re’s no green there. <strong>The</strong>y killed their Mother, and<br />

they’re gonna do the same here…. Unless we stop them.” At the end of Avatar, Jake says, “<strong>The</strong> aliens<br />

[meaning the Earthmen] went back to their dying world.” Avatar reinforces its ecological message through<br />

eye-popping visual effects, digital and 3D imagery, creating a beautiful alien landscape, a lush, tropical<br />

paradise complete with exotic flora and fauna.<br />

Avatar is a moral tale painted in broad strokes: the evil corporation and the mad mercenary, who are<br />

racists, destroyers of the environment, and care only for profits, versus the natives, who are noble savages<br />

spiritually attuned to nature, literally through their connection to the tree of life. When an ecological<br />

paradise and a noble people are threatened with destruction by technologically overwhelming invaders,<br />

the audience of course knows which side to root for. <strong>The</strong> hero realizes that his world is corrupt and<br />

destructive and that the natives are good, so he goes native. To underscore the racial allegory, the villains<br />

are white, whereas the Na’vi are played by non-white actors: Latinos and Latinas, African Americans, and<br />

Native Americans.<br />

On the one hand, Avatar sends numerous positive messages to an American and a global audience: it is<br />

progressive about the disabled, anti-racist, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist, pro-gender equality, and, above<br />

all, pro-environment. It has been called “the most expensive environmental advocacy commercial ever<br />

made” (Scheib 2009). It also mocks the imperialist rhetoric of the George W. Bush administration about<br />

“pre-emptive strikes” and “shock and awe” and the use of mercenary armies such as Blackwater. On the<br />

other hand, these liberal messages are purveyed through a regressive myth about a white messiah and the<br />

noble savages—a white messiah who is reborn as the noblest savage of them all (Gordon and Vera 2009).<br />

<strong>The</strong> plot of Avatar is a pastiche, recycled from a dozen movies about the adventures of a mythic white<br />

163<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

hero in a distant land or on a distant planet, including Lawrence of Arabia (1962), Dune (1984), Dances<br />

with Wolves (1990), and <strong>The</strong> Last Samurai (2003). <strong>The</strong> elements are predictable: the hero shows<br />

tremendous ability, quickly learns the native ways, woos the beautiful native princess, is inducted into the<br />

tribe, and leads them in a struggle for survival and freedom against evil outsiders. <strong>The</strong> white American<br />

racial imagination seems to require such stories (Gordon and Vera 2009).<br />

Avatar is a racial fantasy for the Age of Obama. Like Obama, Jake is racially mixed: although he starts out<br />

as white guy, he ends up inhabiting the body of an aboriginal on an alien planet. And, like Obama, Jake is<br />

accused of being anti-capitalist and anti-white. Yet the movie is a very expensive capitalist product which<br />

resolves white guilt by dividing whites into two kinds: the evil mercenaries who destroy the environment<br />

and kill the native population on behalf of the greedy corporations; and the noble white messiah who goes<br />

native and leads the tribes (and a few good white allies) in a successful battle to preserve their land and<br />

their way of life against the evil whites (Gordon and Vera 2009).<br />

District 9 has many of the same elements as Avatar: both are fast-moving, special-effects SF adventures<br />

about an evil corporation and its evil mercenary army, featuring a white hero sent to relocate sympathetic<br />

extraterrestrials from their home, who is transformed into an alien and in the end takes up their cause.<br />

Nevertheless, although they may have similar stories, Avatar is a romantic myth continuing the Hollywood<br />

tradition of tales of the noble white hero who goes native and joins the noble savages, whereas District 9<br />

was made outside the Hollywood orbit and has many of the marks of independent or Third <strong>World</strong> cinema.<br />

Avatar’s production budget was between $250 and $350 million dollars; District 9’s was only $30 million<br />

(Cho 2009).<br />

Moreover, Avatar is rated PG-13, targeted to a family audience, whereas District 9 is rated R, aimed at a<br />

more adult audience, and is more hard-edged, complete with graphic violence, swear words, and sexual<br />

content. For example, District 9 includes vomiting, bloodshed, and gross-out scenes of body horror; the<br />

protagonist Wikus’ all-purpose expletive is “fuckin”; there is mention of interspecies prostitution; and<br />

Wikus himself is falsely accused of having intercourse with aliens, “doing it doggy style with a demon.”<br />

District 9 co-writer and director Neill Blomkamp says, “<strong>The</strong> film is two things: it is a Hollywood popcorn<br />

movie…. but it also needed to be as real as possible and as grounded as possible” (Blomkamp 2009).<br />

Half of the film is pseudo-documentary, consisting of interviews and television news reports or pseudo-<br />

found footage, such as laboratory experiments and surveillance tapes. Many shots are done with hand-<br />

held camera, images caught on the fly rather than the beautifully composed shots of Avatar. To further<br />

the realism, it was shot largely on location in Soweto, the densely populated Johannesburg, South Africa<br />

black ghetto, in a section with a hundred abandoned tin shacks built on landfill. Although the events<br />

164


are fantastic, the environment is real: garbage-strewn and disgusting. To add to the authenticity, the<br />

mercenaries use contemporary South African military vehicles, uniforms, and weapons.<br />

Aside from favoring realism over romantic mythology, District 9 also differs tonally from Avatar<br />

because of its strong elements of horror, black humor, and political satire. Avatar has no horror, takes<br />

itself seriously, and lacks satire except for Quaritch’s echo of a George W. Bush line. Simply by virtue of<br />

being set in contemporary Johannesburg, District 9 comments on South Africa under apartheid and post-<br />

apartheid.<br />

It is very much a local film. Neill Blomkamp is a young, white South African who moved to Canada. In<br />

Vancouver, ”I started working as a special effects artist…. then directing music videos and commercials”<br />

(Abramovitch 2009). In 2005, he returned to make a short film, Alive in Joburg, in which he interviewed<br />

black South Africans for their opinions about recent black immigrants to South Africa from Zimbabwe<br />

and Nigeria. Given the opportunity to make a feature film by the New Zealand producer/director Peter<br />

Jackson (of the Lord of the Rings trilogy), he kept some of the documentary features and changed the<br />

immigrants into extraterrestrials.<br />

Blomkamp’s interest was in “Western SF placed in Southern Africa.” He says, “Johannesburg is<br />

science fiction to me […] I fear that Johannesburg represents the future of the planet […] where we’re<br />

going with lack of resources and overpopulation […] Five percent of the population controlling all the<br />

wealth, and everybody else lives in abject poverty. If you want to see that future, just take a plane trip<br />

to Johannesburg.” He saw the contrast between the exclusive gated communities of the wealthy and the<br />

vast, sprawling slums of Johannesburg, and he wanted to capture the atmosphere of “an urban prison”<br />

(Blomkamp 2009). <strong>The</strong> title, District 9, alludes to District 6, a mixed-race area in Cape Town, South<br />

Africa, whose citizens were forcibly evacuated in the 1970s so that the district could be leveled and rebuilt<br />

for whites only (“District Six”).<br />

<strong>The</strong> genesis of the film, he says, was “layering science fiction into the apartheid world” (Blomkamp<br />

2009). In 1982, 28 years before the film’s present, a million “Prawn” arrived in a disabled spaceship<br />

hovering over Johannesburg. <strong>The</strong> premise resembles Alien Nation (1988), except that in that film the<br />

aliens look much like humans and want only jobs, whereas the Prawn are insectoid and unassimilable<br />

(Zborowski 2010). Helpless and destitute, the Prawn were housed in a temporary camp. A sociologist<br />

comments for the documentary: “What was a temporary holding zone soon became fenced, became<br />

militarized, and, before we knew it, it was a slum.” Even though the wall around District 9 has an<br />

idealistic slogan—“Paving the Way to Unity”—and a battered iron statue of a Human and a Prawn<br />

holding hands, the reality is ugly, as the Prawn are confined to their ghetto, exploited and brutalized.<br />

165<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Signs proliferate: “No Prawn Allowed.” One black woman, interviewed on TV, says, “<strong>The</strong>y’re spending<br />

so much money to keep them there, when they could be spending it on other things. But at least they’re<br />

keeping them separate from us.” Another black citizen bluntly says, on camera, “<strong>The</strong>y must just go.” <strong>The</strong><br />

neighboring humans begin to riot, and it is decided to relocate the aliens.<br />

This black vs. Prawn conflict can be considered a political allegory about the xenophobia of the post-<br />

apartheid South African society, in which poor black South Africans rioted against destitute Zimbabweans,<br />

even killing some immigrants. According to Blomkamp, they hated the Zimbabwean refugees as “aliens<br />

who had arrived in their communities” (Blomkamp 2009).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Na’vi in Avatar live in harmony with their planet, and have a sophisticated culture and direct<br />

biochemical links to the ecosystem; the humans are the alien invaders. Jake says of the Na’vi, “<strong>The</strong>re is<br />

nothing that we have that they want.” In District 9, however, the Prawn are the aliens intruding on planet<br />

Earth. But they come neither as the typical invading aliens out to conquer the planet nor as wise and<br />

peaceful visitors but as homeless indigents, undesirable aliens who can never be integrated.<br />

For most of the film, we are kept at a documentary remove from the Prawn. Our first glimpse of them is<br />

documentary footage of first contact aboard their stranded ship by a South African exploratory team. <strong>The</strong><br />

Prawn are caught in a floodlight: a horde of grey, shambling monstrosities that initially elicit shock and<br />

horror. A reporter tells us, “<strong>The</strong> creatures were extremely malnourished. <strong>The</strong>y were very unhealthy. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

seemed to be aimless.” <strong>The</strong>y are helpless refugees, charity cases.<br />

An entomologist says in an interview that they are insectoid, hive creatures. <strong>The</strong> Prawn in the colony<br />

are drone workers who lack initiative because “they lost all the upper leadership, for whatever cause, we<br />

presume illness.” <strong>The</strong>y scavenge the garbage piles for anything usable and are thieving magpies who<br />

will steal the sneakers off your feet and engage in seemingly random violence. A sociologist says that the<br />

derogatory term “Prawn” “implies something that is a bottom feeder that scavenges the leftovers.” Not<br />

mentioned is that there is in Johannesburg a cricket called the Parktown prawn, “capable of large jumps<br />

when threatened, often ejecting an offensive black fecal liquid.” <strong>The</strong>se pests eat anything, including cat<br />

food (“Parktown Prawn”). <strong>The</strong> movie gives the aliens all the attributes of the Parktown prawn. Unlike the<br />

handsome humanoids in Avatar, the Prawn are ugly, shiftless pests, ideal targets for racist paranoia. In the<br />

racist imagination, ethnic and racial others are viewed as animals or insects. As Quaritch says when he<br />

destroys the natives’ home, “That’s how you scatter the roaches.”<br />

Nevertheless, despite their insectoid features, the Prawn are relatable through their anthropomorphic<br />

shape: they have two arms, two legs, and a head, and they walk upright. Says Neill Blomkamp, “Because<br />

166


you have to empathize with the aliens, they needed to have a humanlike face…. You can see that there’s<br />

an intelligent, sentient being behind the eyes, but it’s gross and you don’t want to be sitting next to it on<br />

the bus” (Blomkamp 2009). Like Spielberg’s E.T., they are ugly but have large, expressive, humanoid<br />

eyes. In addition, some of the Prawn comically adopt bits of human clothing.<br />

Moreover, despite the apparently aimless behavior of the drones, the Prawn are not primitives but possess<br />

an advanced technology that carried them across the galaxy. <strong>The</strong>y have something the humans want:<br />

advanced weaponry. MNU (Multi-National United), the corporation tasked with relocating the Prawn,<br />

wants those weapons. An MNU scientist says, “<strong>The</strong>ir technology is engineered in a biological manner and<br />

interacts with their DNA.” Whoever unlocks the secret, so that humans can operate Prawn weapons, will<br />

make billions of dollars.<br />

For that reason, MNU engages in grotesque medical experiments in a hidden lab, trying to uncover the<br />

secrets of Prawn DNA. Blomkamp says the idea of medical torture was taken from Nazi experiments, but<br />

there were also racial medical experiments during the apartheid regime. For example, “<strong>The</strong>y were trying<br />

to develop pathogens that could affect a black genetic group and not a white genetic group” (Blomkamp<br />

2009).<br />

Just as we are at first distanced from the aliens for most of District 9, so we are distanced from the hero.<br />

Jake in Avatar is a crippled warrior made sympathetic through his voice-over narration. But Wikus van<br />

der Merwe, the white South African protagonist in District 9, is a weasel of a guy with a ratty mustache,<br />

a petty bureaucrat who zealously does the corporation’s dirty work of evicting the aliens. We are kept at<br />

a documentary remove from him. His mother says, “Wikus was not a very smart boy,” and his father-in-<br />

law says Wikus “was never very strong.” At first, his only positive characteristic is his deep love for his<br />

wife. Blomkamp says, “He’s a complete bureaucrat, this very anal, rule-following kind of guy. He’s a….<br />

passive racist, an indirect racist” (Blomkamp 2009).<br />

Nevertheless, in the course the film, Wikus changes dramatically for the better. As Blomkamp says, “he<br />

goes through this staggering arc…. As he becomes more alien, he becomes more human” (Blomkamp<br />

2009).<br />

In the opening, the documentary alludes to an unspecified disaster which happened during the evictions.<br />

Wikus was blamed, and apparently he is either missing or dead. His mother and wife are very sad, but<br />

some co-workers denounce Wikus as a betrayer who can’t be forgiven. This arouses our curiosity at the<br />

beginning as to what he did and whether he is still alive.<br />

Wikus is elated and proud at being promoted by his father-in-law to field officer in charge of the eviction,<br />

167<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

a dubious promotion due to nepotism. He takes his new authority very seriously and goes door to door<br />

among the Prawn shacks, grasping his clipboard, asking each alien to put a scrawl on a pseudo-legal<br />

eviction notice which most of them do not understand. Helicopters hover overhead, and heavily armed<br />

soldiers force unarmed Prawns to their knees and murder any resisters, like the Nazi liquidations of the<br />

Jewish ghettos. One South African critic attests to the authenticity of the scene: “<strong>The</strong> obvious value of<br />

turning the shack dweller into a real alien is that the film can deal with the […] processes by which we<br />

turn people into aliens, contain them, criminalise them, beat them and then evict them ‘for their own good’<br />

[…] although it is a fantasy it contains more reality than we’re likely to find in […] the official consensus”<br />

(Pitmore 2009).<br />

Wikus is a zealous enforcer for the corporation, using bribery—cans of catfood for the adults and candy<br />

for the child aliens—and threats: when the alien called “Christopher Johnson” refuses to sign, he threatens<br />

to put his little son into child custody.<br />

Wikus is elated when he uncovers illegal caches of alien weapons or technology, but he is most<br />

despicable when he discovers an alien hatchery. He begins aborting the alien eggs by unplugging them<br />

from nourishment, a dead cow carcass. <strong>The</strong>n he is gleeful as the incubator is destroyed by flamethrower,<br />

explaining to the documentary filmmaker that “the popping sound, almost like popcorn,” that they hear<br />

is the sound of the Prawn eggs exploding. At this moment, Wikus seems not that different from the brutal<br />

mercenary Col. Koobus Venter, who smiles when he shoots a wounded, unarmed Prawn in the head.<br />

Things begin to change drastically for Wikus when he discovers a capsule in Christopher Johnson’s lab.<br />

He accidentally squirts himself in the face with the black fluid in the capsule, which is spaceship fuel, and<br />

the contamination begins the process of his transformation into a Prawn. He becomes weak and feverish,<br />

vomits, oozes black fluid from his nose, loses control of his bowels, and, most scary, starts to lose his<br />

fingernails. That evening, he vomits black fluid and collapses.<br />

At the hospital, when they cut the cast off his arm (he had been injured during the evacuations), to his<br />

horror he discovers that his left hand has changed into an alien claw. Immediately, Wikus is placed in<br />

quarantine and evacuated to the MNU lab. <strong>The</strong>re he is poked and prodded and forced to shoot targets<br />

with alien weaponry. When he refuses to kill a live Prawn, they shock him with an electric cattle prod.<br />

Wikus is horrified.<br />

When they prepare to operate to harvest his valuable mix of human and alien DNA, Wikus goes berserk,<br />

jumps off the table, seizes a hostage, and escapes. For the rest of the movie, he is on the run from MNU,<br />

who want to recapture him because he is “the most valuable business artifact on Earth.” As Blomkamp<br />

168


says, “Our protagonist flees to the area that he is responsible for creating and ends up in a shack, which is<br />

precisely what this guy kind of deserved” (Blomkamp 2009). Wikus now finds himself in a place similar<br />

to Jake after the fall of Hometree: alien, outcast, and alone.<br />

Yet the fundamental difference is that, for Jake, being an alien is voluntary and a reward, whereas for<br />

Wikus it is involuntary and a punishment. In that sense, District 9 resembles movies in which a white<br />

character is transformed against his will, by magic, into a person of another race, such as Finian’s Rainbow<br />

(1968), Watermelon Man (1970), and Zelig (1984) (Vera and Gordon 2003,146-50). Wikus is a racist who<br />

can only be redeemed by literally forcing him into the skin of the despised race he has been oppressing.<br />

But his physical and psychological change into an alien is gradual.<br />

At first, Wikus falls back on legalities and white privilege, as when he demands that a fast-food restaurant<br />

is legally obliged to serve him. And when he discovers an alien ship beneath the alien Christopher’s shack.<br />

Wikus says, “This is very illegal. This is a find…. Are you fuckers trying to fly this? You sneaky fucking<br />

prawns!” His mindset as an MNU bureaucrat and enforcer of the law in the ghetto comically clashes with<br />

his present situation as an outlaw who is half-Prawn and needs a place to hide.<br />

To his disgust, Wikus gains the alien taste for catfood. Next his teeth start falling out. When his wife rejects<br />

him on the phone, in despair Wikus attempts to chop off his alien left arm with a hatchet, succeeding only<br />

in amputating a claw. Later he is appalled to find the skin peeling off his body as it is being replaced by<br />

a Prawn carapace. Blomkamp calls this “body horror…. <strong>The</strong>re’s nothing more horrifying that the idea<br />

that your body is coming apart at the seams…. You are turning into another being…. Does the structure<br />

of your brain turn into something else as well? At what point is Wikus no longer Wikus?” (Blomkamp<br />

2009). In this respect, the film recalls the physical and psychological torment of the hero of the horror<br />

movie <strong>The</strong> Fly (1986) who because of a botched lab experiment is slowly transformed into a monster,<br />

half-human and half-insect.<br />

Despite his accelerating physical transformation, Wikus still clings to his human identity. When<br />

Christopher’s little son compares his arm to Wikus’, saying “We are the same,” Wikus denies it: “We’re<br />

not the fucking same.” Yet if he is not yet a Prawn, nevertheless he is no longer the same heartless fascist<br />

bureaucrat. He admits to Christopher and Christopher’s son that the relocation camp he was touting is “more<br />

like a concentration camp.”<br />

When Wikus learns that Christopher can change him back into human shape if they can get to the<br />

mothership, he hatches a plan to recover the capsule containing the black fuel. He becomes a desperado,<br />

stealing alien weapons from a Nigerian gang and shooting his way out, then breaking into the MNU lab<br />

169<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

with Christopher, killing several mercenaries and escaping with the capsule. According to Blomkamp, the<br />

film questions how far a man can be pushed until he crosses over “to become this mercenary rogue guy”<br />

(Blomkamp 2009). Wikus has now been pushed so far that he will stop at nothing.<br />

Stopping at nothing means that he is even willing to betray his Prawn friend. Christopher now says<br />

he must go home in the mothership to get help to rescue his people from the medical experiments he<br />

witnessed in the MNU lab, and he will return in three years. Unwilling to wait, Wikus hits Christopher in<br />

the head and takes off in the command module with Christopher’s son. When he slugs his friend, it makes<br />

us hate Wikus again, says Blomkamp. “Because, at his core, he’s kind of a dick” (Blomkamp 2009). You<br />

begin to wonder whether this character is redeemable.<br />

After that, the action speeds up to the climactic showdown, which is a three-way shootout between the<br />

mercenaries, the Nigerians, and Wikus. At first, Wikus flees like a coward from Koobus, but when he<br />

overhears Koobus’ plan to kill Christopher, he returns to rescue him. This is the turning point of the film:<br />

Wikus, who previously acted only for himself, now stays behind to fight so that his alien friend can get to<br />

his son, go to the mothership, and return home.<br />

Because of Koobus’ sacrifice, Christopher and his son succeed, and the mothership takes off. <strong>The</strong>re may<br />

even be a religious allegory in a character named Christopher who wants to save his people, ascends into<br />

the sky, and promises to return, not in three days but in three years (Smith-Rowsey). <strong>The</strong> conversion of<br />

Wikus could then be seen almost as a religious conversion.<br />

In the climactic battle, Wikus in a robotic exosuit fights off the mercenary army and Col. Koobus. It<br />

resembles the climax of Avatar, but with weapons reversed because in Avatar the mercenary Col. Quaritch<br />

had the enhanced powers of exosuit armor. Finally, an exhausted Wikus crawls out of the damaged<br />

exosuit. Now further transformed, Wikus has one human and one enlarged alien eye. Koobus holds a gun<br />

on him, saying, “You half-breed piece of shit, I’m just gonna kill you myself,” like Quaritch in the climax<br />

of Avatar calling Jake a race traitor as he prepares to kill him. And, just as Jake is rescued at the last<br />

moment by the native woman Neytiri, so Wikus is rescued by a mob of the Prawn, who tear Koobus apart<br />

limb from limb .<br />

<strong>The</strong> film ends with a return to the documentary mode. “District 10 now houses 2.5 million aliens and<br />

continues to grow.” No one knows if Christopher Johnson “will come back and declare war on us,” and<br />

no one knows what happened to Wikus. His wife Tania has not given up hope; she just found a little metal<br />

flower on her doorstep, typical of the handmade gifts Wikus used to give her. In the film’s last shot, we see<br />

a Prawn on a garbage heap shaping a little metal sculpture. In his commentary, the director says, “I hope<br />

170


the audience feels they’ve gone along on this journey with Wikus and that he redeems himself in the end”<br />

(Blomkamp 2009).<br />

Both films were very popular and have been widely praised and criticized. Avatar was praised for its<br />

beautiful cinematography, groundbreaking effects, and some of its liberal messages, but criticized for its<br />

clichés, bad dialogue, and preachiness. District 9 was lauded for its novelty, realism, and relevance to<br />

contemporary globalization and South African problems in the post-apartheid period, but criticized for<br />

being politically confused and perhaps reinforcing the racist messages it seems to be trying to deconstruct.<br />

One representative critic writes of District 9, “It decries xenophobia but presents a situation where<br />

progress and integration are rendered unimaginable. <strong>The</strong> film creates the alien identification figure that its<br />

plot requires [Christopher], but the script does not do enough to help us understand how he ‘fits in’ with<br />

the other aliens” (Zborowski 2010).<br />

In particular, the film spurred outrage among some Africans for its apparently racist representation of the<br />

Nigerian immigrants who have settled in District 9 and exploit the Prawns, and who are represented as<br />

vicious gangsters led by a superstitious and savage warlord. One critic wrote that this portrayal “spits in<br />

the faces of the millions of Nigerian citizens who devoted themselves to the anti-apartheid movement”<br />

(Ray 2010), and an online petition site asked the filmmakers to apologize to the Nigerian people (“District<br />

9 slander” 2010). But another African critic responded, “If District 9 ‘hates Nigerians’…. then it hates<br />

its powerful, white characters even more…. Blomkamp is forcing us to challenge our own perceptions<br />

about race and equality. He makes it clear the Nigerians are no better or worse than their white (or<br />

alien) counterparts, creating an unsettling sort of equality among the characters. And while the film may<br />

occasionally play on clumsy racial stereotypes, it also encourages us to challenge them” (Azikiwe 2009).<br />

Other critics concur: “No single group within South African society is presented in a sympathetic way,<br />

neither the MNU people or the military, nor the people on the streets or the ‘experts’ interviewed” (Gunkel<br />

and Konig 2010).<br />

In conclusion, I would have to say that District 9 is a more thoughtful movie than Avatar. Whereas<br />

Avatar sometimes spells out its messages in a heavy-handed way, District 9 allows the audience to sift<br />

through its various layers—faux-documentary and cinematic narrative—and reach our own conclusions.<br />

I enjoy Blomkamp’s dark sense of humor, his bureaucratic nerd hero and bizarre aliens who, unlike<br />

Cameron’s Na’vi, are “ignoble savages.” At first, both hero and alien are deliberately unsympathetic. In a<br />

typical science fiction movie, the Prawns would have been the villains, incomprehensible extraterrestrial<br />

monsters. We come to sympathize with the hero and the aliens only later, when we see that the fascist<br />

multi-national corporation and its mercenary army is far worse, more inhumane (and inhuman) than<br />

171<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

anyone else in the film.<br />

Blomkamp says, “<strong>The</strong> thing of District 9 is that I’m not trying to be overly metaphorical or have<br />

any preachy lessons or any political standpoint other than I grew up in that environment, and I love<br />

science fiction, and I’m merging the two” (Abramovitch 2009). While writing the script with co-author<br />

Terri Tatchell, Blomkamp says he became aware “‘that all these very serious topics about racism and<br />

xenophobia and segregation would start to shine through the science-fiction-esque veneer…. I had to be<br />

very careful that I didn’t get too close to these serious topics with a film that’s mostly a summer thrill ride.’<br />

He told himself, ‘It’s your first film. Use it as satire. Chill out” (Corliss 2009).<br />

If we consider District 9 as a satire, then its strategy becomes more understandable: it is not a racist film<br />

but rather a satire on racist stereotypes. Satire aims to ridicule people, institutions, or attitudes by pushing<br />

them ad absurdum, like Jonathan Swift’s “A Modest Proposal.” District 9 takes all the stereotypes of<br />

xenophobia and racist paranoia and realizes them in the Prawn, who are totally “Other”: ugly, violent,<br />

insect-like, shiftless, erratic, not that bright, thieving, incomprehensible in their language, and low and<br />

vile in their eating habits and behavior. <strong>The</strong>y are straight out of a racist nightmare, inhuman creatures<br />

possessing every single negative attribute which the xenophobic imagination projects upon the “Other.”<br />

Having created these monsters, the film then challenges us nevertheless to sympathize with them, for they<br />

are stranded on a planet where they do not belong and will never fit in. Through Wikus’ interaction with<br />

Christopher and Christopher’s little son, we come to realize that they are intelligent beings who care for<br />

each other and have moral values, are our technological superiors, and are worthy of respect and decent<br />

treatment, not to be shunted aside into slums, to be exploited and brutalized.<br />

Both Avatar and District 9 suggest that contemporary Western civilization is so drastically ill that the cure<br />

might be for white people to become radically other, to transform themselves into aliens. Although I enjoy<br />

both films, District 9 is the more challenging and thought-provoking work. As one critic says, “District 9<br />

serves to highlight just how far cinema has come by depicting the human Self and the alien Other as two<br />

halves of the same whole” (Jones 2010, 122).<br />

References<br />

Abramovitch, Seth. 2009. “District 9 Director Neill Blomkamp: <strong>The</strong> Movieline Interview.”<br />

http://movieline.com/2009/08/11/district-9-director-neill-blomkamp/<br />

Avatar. 2009. 20th Century Fox. Director/Screenplay: James Cameron. Producers: James Cameron<br />

and Jon Landau. Photography (3-D): Mauro Fiore. Music: James Horner. Cast: Sam Worthington<br />

172


(Corporal Jake Sully), Zoe Saldana (Neytiri), Stephen Lang (Colonel Miles Quaritch), Sigourney<br />

Weaver (Dr. Grace Augustine), Joel David Moore (Norm Spellman), Michelle Rodriguez (Trudy<br />

Chacon), Giovanni Ribisi (Parker Selfridge), Laz Alonso (Tsu’tey), C.C.H. Pounder (Mo’at), Wes<br />

Studi (Eytucan), Dileep Rao (Dr. Max Patel).<br />

Azikiwe, Abayomi. 2009. “District 9’ Film Generates Controversy Over Depiction of Nigerians.” Pan<br />

African News Wire. September 8, 2009.<br />

http://panafricannews.blogspot.com/2009/09/9-film-generates-controversy-over.html<br />

Blomkamp, Neill 2009. District 9 DVD commentary.<br />

Cho, David. 2009. “‘Avatar’ Part 2, with David Cho: Who Remembers ‘District 9’?” <strong>The</strong> Awl. December<br />

18th, 2009.<br />

http://www.theawl.com/2009/12/avatar-part-2-with-david-cho-who-remembers-district-9<br />

Corliss, Richard. 2009. “District 9’ Review: <strong>The</strong> Summer’s Coolest Fantasy Film.” Time, August 13,<br />

2009. http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1916009,00.html<br />

“District Six.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_Six<br />

District 9. 2009. Tristar. Director: Neill Blomkamp. Writers: Neill Blomkamp and Terri Tatchell.<br />

Producers: Peter Jackson, Carolynne Cunningham. Co-Producer: Philippa Boyens. Music: Clinton<br />

Shorter. Photography: Trent Opaloch. Production Design: Philip Ivey. Cast: Sharlto Copley(Wikus<br />

van der Merwe), Jason Cope: Christopher Johnson, David James (Col. Koobus Venter), Vanessa<br />

Haywood (Tania van der Merwe), Louis Minaar (Piet Smit).<br />

Fore, Dana. 2011. “<strong>The</strong> tracks of Sully’s tears: disability in James Cameron’s Avatar.” Jump Cut 53.<br />

http://www.ejumpcut.org/currentissue/foreAvatar/index.html<br />

Gordon, Andrew M. and Hernán Vera. 2009. “Dances With Aliens.” Racism Review. http://www.<br />

racismreview.com/blog/2009/12/30/dances-with-aliens-james-camerons-avatar-movie-and-white-<br />

saviors/<br />

Gunkel, Henriette and Christiane König. 2010. “You are not welcome here’: post-apartheid negrophobia<br />

& real aliens in Blomkamp’s District 9.” Dark Matter: In the Ruins of Imperial Culture. 7 Feb<br />

2010.<br />

http://www.darkmatter101.org/site/2010/02/07/you-are-not-welcome-here/.<br />

Jones, Matthew. 2010. District 9: Review. Film & History 40.1: 120-22.<br />

http://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/film_and_history/v040/40.1.jones.<br />

html<br />

Newitz, Annalee. “When Will White People Stop Making Movies Like Avatar?”<br />

http://io9.com/5422666/when-will-white-people-stop-making-movies-like-avatar<br />

“Parktown prawn.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parktown_prawn<br />

Pitmore, Richard. 2009. “Hold the Prawns.” <strong>The</strong> South African Civil Society Information Service<br />

website, September 14, 2009. http://www.sacsis.org.za/site/article/352.1<br />

173<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Rank, Otto. 1959. <strong>The</strong> Myth of the Birth of the Hero and Other Writings, ed. Philip Freund. NY: Vintage.<br />

Ray, Carina. 2010. “Humanizing Aliens or Alienating Africans?: District 9 and the Politics of<br />

Representation.” http://www.zeleza.com/symposium/949<br />

Reider, John. 2011. “Race and revenge fantasies in Avatar, District 9 and Inglourious Basterds.” Science<br />

Fiction Film and Television 4.1: 41-56.<br />

Scheib, Richard. 2009. Review of Avatar. http://0to5stars-moria.ca/sciencefiction/avatar-2009.htm<br />

Smith-Rowsey, Daniel. “From Santa Mira to South Africa: Updating the Invasion Narrative for the 21st<br />

Century.” JGCinema.com: Cinema and Globalization.<br />

http://www.jgcinema.com/single.php?sl=invasion-body-snatchers-dossier-horror<br />

Vera, Hernán and Andrew M. Gordon. 2003. Screen Saviors: Hollywood Fictions of Whiteness. Lanham,<br />

MD: Rowman and Littlefield.<br />

Zborowski James. 2010. “District 9 and its <strong>World</strong>.” Jump Cut 52. http://www.ejumpcut.org/currentissue/<br />

zoborowskiDst9/<br />

174


<strong>The</strong> Work of Art in the Age of Digital Technology:<br />

What Kind of a Future Will Human Beings Create?<br />

Peter L. Rudnytsky<br />

University of Florida<br />

1<br />

In the sublime first stasimon of Sophocles’ Antigone, the Chorus sings of the seemingly limitless powers<br />

enjoyed by human beings. Man, the Chorus proclaims, can sail across the ocean in swift ships, plough<br />

the unwearied earth, capture beasts of land, sea, and air, learn languages to express his thoughts, build<br />

houses and cities, and even discover remedies for once-incurable diseases. <strong>The</strong>re is only death, the Chorus<br />

somberly notes, from which man cannot escape.<br />

Even this rough paraphrase may suffice to convey something of the essential duality in the attitude<br />

expressed by Sophocles’ Chorus: on the one hand, the ode celebrates—much as will Shakespeare’s<br />

Hamlet two millennia later—“What a piece of work is a man! How noble in reason, how infinite<br />

in faculty”—while on the other hand, by its reminder of the finality of death, the Chorus likewise<br />

foreshadows Hamlet’s melancholy question, “And yet what to me is this quintessence of dust?”<br />

Indeed, the tension between exuberant optimism and tragic pessimism in the ode as a whole is distilled by<br />

Sophocles in its haunting first line, which reads in the original Greek:<br />

πολλὰ τὰ δεινὰ κοὐδὲν ἀνθώρπου δεινότερον πέλει·<br />

<strong>The</strong> Victorian translation of R. C. Jebb is instructive as much for what it gets wrong as for what it gets<br />

right about the line: “Wonders are many, and none is more wonderful than man.” For the words that<br />

Jebb translates as “wonders” and “more wonderful,” δεινὰ and δεινότερον, are both formed from the<br />

adjectival noun δεινῶς, which, according to the Liddell-Scott-Jones lexicon of classical Greek, has three<br />

principal meanings: (1) fearful or terrible; (2) marvelously strong or powerful; and (3) clever or skillful.<br />

175<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Jebb, it is clear, has captured the second of these meanings, and possibly also the third; but nothing at all<br />

of the first, which portrays the power of what is deinos not as something benign but rather as something<br />

inducing fear and terror in those who are exposed to it.<br />

Thus, Heidegger, in his profound philosophical meditation on this chorus in An Introduction to<br />

Metaphysics, translates deinos as unheimlich or “uncanny,” while Hölderlin, in his inspired poetic<br />

rendering, opts even more radically for ungeheuer, meaning “terrible” or “monstrous”:<br />

Ungeheuer ist viel. Doch nichts<br />

Ungeheuerer, als der Mensch.<br />

Or, in English:<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is much that is terrible. But nothing<br />

That is more terrible than man.<br />

As Heidegger comments in part, “the deinon is the terrible in the sense of the overpowering power which<br />

compels panic fear, true fear; and in equal measure it is the collected silent awe that vibrates with its own<br />

rhythm.” On the other hand, Heidegger continues, “deinon means the powerful in the sense of one who<br />

uses power”; and, in summary, “the verse says that to be the strangest of all is the basic trait of the human<br />

essence, within which all other traits must find their place.” 1<br />

What Heidegger formulates in existential terms can also be understood from the vantage point of<br />

psychoanalysis. For it is clear that deinos is what Freud would call a “primal word”—that is, a word with<br />

two antithetical meanings, such as the Latin altus, which means both “high” and “deep,” or sacer, which<br />

means both “sacred” and “accursed”—and in translating deinos into German as unheimlich, Heidegger<br />

joins up with Freud, who devotes a paper to the phenomenon of the uncanny, which he explains as<br />

something encountered either in life or in art that one experiences as “strange” precisely because it is only<br />

too “familiar” (heimlich), except that it has been alienated from the subject by a process of repression.<br />

With the aid of Heidegger, Hölderlin, and Freud, therefore, we have found in the first line of Sophocles’<br />

choral ode a starting point for our investigation into the paradox that makes humans “the strangest of all”<br />

beings, at once the most wonderful and terrible of creatures, a perspective that will guide as we turn now<br />

1 Martin Heidegger, An Introduction to Metaphysics (1935), trans. Ralph Manheim (New Haven: Yale University Press,<br />

1959), pp. 149-51.<br />

176


to reflect on the place of the work of art in the age of digital technology, and thus what it might mean to<br />

speak of the creative human being of the future.<br />

2<br />

In giving my address at the Second <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong> in Busan the title “<strong>The</strong> Work of Art in the<br />

Age of Digital Technology,” I mean to pay homage to Walter Benjamin’s classic essay of 1936, “<strong>The</strong><br />

Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” Written during what we can now recognize to have<br />

been the age of high modernism, Benjamin’s essay sets forth with great cogency many of the issues that<br />

continue to preoccupy us in the current postmodern era.<br />

Benjamin’s central concern is to elucidate what he terms “the social bases of the contemporary decay<br />

of the aura,” 2 with reference above all to the quintessentially twentieth-century arts of photography<br />

and film. For Benjamin, the “aura” of a work of art emanates from “its unique existence at the place<br />

where it happens to be,” and, because “the presence of the original is the requisite to the concept of<br />

authenticity,” it is precisely the aura that “withers in the age of mechanical reproduction” (pp. 222-23).<br />

In Benjamin’s analysis, the power of mechanical reproduction at once “substitutes a plurality of copies<br />

for a unique existence” and “detaches the reproduced object from the domain of tradition.” In keeping<br />

with Heidegger’s exposition only one year earlier of the antithetical meanings of Sophocles’ definition of<br />

man, moreover, Benjamin notes that both these consequences of technology are “intimately connected”<br />

with “contemporary mass movements,” and that their “social significance, particularly in its most positive<br />

form, is inconceivable without its destructive, cathartic aspect, that is, the liquidation of the traditional<br />

value of the cultural heritage” (p. 223).<br />

Benjamin’s formulations are astonishing in their prescience. His task, let me reiterate, is to examine the<br />

effects of technological innovation on the nature and experience of the work of art, a project that the<br />

ever-accelerating rate of change makes even more urgent in our own time. As if he could foresee the<br />

iconic Campbell’s Soup Cans of Andy Warhol, Benjamin writes, “To an ever greater degree the work<br />

of art reproduced becomes the work of art designed for reproduction” (p. 226). Or, in a harbinger of<br />

the astonishing popularity of “reality TV,” Benjamin remarks: “Any man today can lay claim to being<br />

filmed” (p. 233). And, calling attention to the way that the proliferation of newspapers and other print<br />

media has changed the relationship between writers and readers, Benjamin anticipates the emergence<br />

of Internet blogs when he observes that “the distinction between author and public is about to lose its<br />

2 Walter Benjamin, “<strong>The</strong> Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction,” in Illuminations, trans. Ralph Manheim<br />

(London: Fontana Books, 1973), p. 225. Subsequent page references will be given parenthetically.<br />

177<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

basic character,” and “at any moment, the reader is ready to turn into a writer,” who, “as expert,” in some<br />

domain or another, “gains access to authorship” (p. 234).<br />

In short, Benjamin anticipates the advent of postmodernism, which Jean Baudrillard has characterized<br />

as marked by the emergence of a third order of simulation. In Baudrillard’s historical schema, the first<br />

order of simulation is associated with the premodern period in Western culture, in which the sign or image<br />

stands in place of the real object, while the second order arises during the modern period as the distinction<br />

between image and reality breaks down due to the proliferation of mass-produced copies in the Industrial<br />

Revolution. This shift from the first to the second order of simulation is the transformation in sensibility<br />

registered by Benjamin in his essay. Toward the end of the twentieth century, however, humanity has<br />

collectively reached the third order of simulation endemic to postmodernism, in which the sign usurps<br />

the vacated place of the thing, the copy becomes ontologically prior to the original, and “there is only the<br />

simulacrum.” 3<br />

Consider, against this backdrop, Benjamin’s quotation from Paul Valéry’s 1928 essay, “<strong>The</strong> Conquest<br />

of Ubiquity,” concerning the impact of technological progress on aesthetic experience: “Just as water,<br />

gas, and electricity are brought into our houses from far off to satisfy our needs in response to a minimal<br />

effort, so we shall be supplied with visual or auditory images, which will appear and disappear at a simple<br />

movement of the hand, hardly more than a sign.” 4 It is, again, uncanny how what Benjamin, with the aid<br />

of Valéry, has to say about the way photography foreshadows the advent of the sound film in the modern<br />

era applies even more strikingly to the postmodern era, in which it is on our computers that images “appear<br />

and disappear with a simple movement of the hand,” and that which flickers before us on the screen is<br />

indeed “hardly more than a sign.”<br />

Valéry’s notion of the “conquest of ubiquity” figures centrally in Benjamin’s argument. For integral to<br />

Benjamin’s contrast between painting and film as visual media is the paradox that film offers, “precisely<br />

because of the thoroughgoing permeation of reality by mechanical equipment, an aspect of reality<br />

which is free of all equipment” (p. 236). In other words, the terrible yet wondrous power of “mechanical<br />

equipment” creates the illusion of an unmediated access to reality that depends on the spectator’s<br />

obliviousness to his reliance on the very “equipment” that makes the experience possible. By extension,<br />

the “aura” of a work of art that is embedded in a tradition, but which “withers” when art is mass-produced,<br />

3 Given that my subject is postmodernism, I have taken the liberty of relying on the summary of Baudrillard’s schema<br />

found in Wikipedia. For his own more nuanced exposition, see Jean Baudrillard, “<strong>The</strong> Precession of Simulacra,” in Simulacra<br />

and Simulation (1981), trans. Sheila Faria Glaser (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994), pp. 1-42.<br />

4 Quoted in Benjamin, “<strong>The</strong> Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction,” p. 221.<br />

178


has as its precondition “the unique phenomenon of a distance, however close it may be” (p. 224), whereas<br />

the countervailing “desire of contemporary masses” to overcome “the uniqueness of every reality by<br />

accepting its reproduction” has as its corollary for Benjamin an equally ardent impulse “to bring things<br />

‘closer’ spatially and humanly” (p. 225), that is, the manufacture of a sense of immediacy that is all the<br />

more factitious for seeming to be indistinguishable from reality itself.<br />

It is, for Benjamin, the heightened importance of the mass in twentieth-century culture that ultimately<br />

provides “a matrix from which all traditional behavior towards works of art issues today in a new form”<br />

(p. 241). <strong>The</strong> role of technology in the mass-production of arts such as photography and especially film is<br />

mirrored by the rise of the crowd or mob as a force in social and political life. Benjamin’s essay, indeed,<br />

is structured around a series of binary oppositions that turns on the contrast between the responses to<br />

art by the individual spectator and a collective entity or mass. In Benjamin’s words, “distraction and<br />

concentration form polar opposites which may be stated as follows: A man who concentrates before a<br />

work of art is absorbed by it. He enters into this work of art,” whereas “the distracted mass absorbs the<br />

work of art” (p. 241). <strong>The</strong> individual spectator is to the mass, that is, as concentration is to distraction, as<br />

presence is to representation, but also, in a seeming paradox, as distance and detachment are to immediacy<br />

and participation, and as tradition is to what Benjamin terms “proletarianization” (p. 243).<br />

One has only to recite this litany of polarities invoked by Benjamin to be reminded of yet another, even<br />

more famous antithesis that has been deployed in a treatise on aesthetic experience to account, specifically,<br />

for the power of Greek tragedy. I refer to Nietzsche’s opposition between the principles embodied in the<br />

deities of Apollo and Dionysus, whom, in <strong>The</strong> Birth of Tragedy, (1872), he equates, respectively, with the<br />

plastic arts and music as well as with the realms of dreams and intoxication—or, in Schopenhauer’s terms,<br />

with the dichotomy between the world of appearances and the underlying substrate of the will. But if, for<br />

Nietzsche, the rebirth of tragedy in the modern world was dependent on a reawakening of the spirit of<br />

music—which, at this early stage of his career, he believed to be instantiated in the operas of Wagner—<br />

and, by extension, on a revival of the intuitive wisdom of Dionysus, for Benjamin it was, conversely, the<br />

gathering storm of collective intoxication that was responsible not simply for the disappearance of the<br />

aura of art works in an age of mechanical reproduction but above all for the threat of catastrophe that, in<br />

1936, he could see looming over Europe and, indeed, the world.<br />

<strong>The</strong> exact circumstances of Benjamin’s death in 1940 in the Spanish Pyrenees remain shrouded in<br />

mystery, but there can be no doubt that this German-Jewish Marxist mystic was one of the millions<br />

engulfed by the conflagration of the Holocaust. Thus, what Benjamin has to say about the “destructive”<br />

as well as the “positive” aspects of “contemporary mass movements” has at once an acutely personal<br />

and a broad historical significance. As he writes in the epilogue of his essay, “the destructiveness of<br />

179<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

war furnishes proof that society has not been mature enough to incorporate technology as its organ, that<br />

technology has not been sufficiently developed to cope with the elemental forces of society” (p. 244).<br />

Benjamin’s warning on the eve of <strong>World</strong> War II concerning the dangers lurking in technology to human<br />

beings who may not be “mature enough” to harness its powers wisely returns us to Sophocles’ double<br />

vision in the choral ode of Antigone, and it confronts us even more starkly at the dawn of the twenty-first<br />

century.<br />

3<br />

In the July 1945 issue of <strong>The</strong> Atlantic Monthly, Vannevar Bush, a primary organizer of the Manhattan<br />

Project and Director of the Office of Scientific Research and Development, which promoted cooperation<br />

between the scientific establishment and the United States government, published an article, “As We<br />

May Think,” an abridged version of which was reprinted in Life magazine on September 10, 1945. Not<br />

coincidentally, it was in the interval between the two appearances of Bush’s article that the atomic bombs<br />

were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, a turning point in human history in which Bush himself played<br />

a decisive role.<br />

Although Bush’s article has garnered considerable attention from contemporary scholars, it is still far less<br />

well known than Benjamin’s essay, to which it forms an intellectual and spiritual sequel. For whereas<br />

Benjamin’s essay takes stock on the eve of <strong>World</strong> War II of the changes wrought in human consciousness<br />

by advances in the modern technologies of mechanical reproduction, Bush’s article forecasts in truly<br />

remarkable ways the further revolutionary changes that are currently taking place in our own postmodern<br />

era of digital technology.<br />

Although it is impossible to read “As We May Think” without being reminded of the atomic bomb, it is<br />

alluded to only obliquely by Bush at the outset of his paper. Secure in the knowledge that the war not only<br />

in Europe but also in Japan had already been won, Bush looks ahead to the coming time of peace and<br />

poses the question, “What are the scientists to do next?” 5 Bush is concerned especially with physicists,<br />

who, of all scientists, “have been thrown most violently off stride” by their participation in the war effort,<br />

which has inspired them to invent “strange destructive gadgets,” as a result of which it has been possible<br />

for America “to turn back the enemy” and for those enlisted in the heroic struggle to feel themselves “part<br />

of a great team” (p. 101).<br />

5 Vannevar Bush, “As We May Think,” <strong>The</strong> Atlantic Monthly, July 1945, p. 101. Subsequent page references will be given<br />

parenthetically.<br />

180


In words that echo the chorus of Antigone, Bush begins the main portion of his article by asking, “Of<br />

what lasting benefit has been man’s use of science and of the new instruments which his research brought<br />

into existence?” (p. 101). He responds by asserting that these inventions “have increased his control of<br />

his material environment,” specifically citing improvements in food, clothing, and shelter. Even more<br />

sweepingly, Bush credits science with bestowing upon mankind “a progressive freedom from disease and<br />

an increased span of life.” <strong>The</strong> dividends paid by these “new instruments,” he contends, extend from the<br />

physical realm to “improved mental health.”<br />

Although few people are likely to dispute Bush’s contention that science has been of “lasting benefit”<br />

to humanity in a variety of ways, there is, by comparison with Benjamin’s analysis, a naïve and indeed<br />

utopian quality to Bush’s celebration of progress. For when he states that the wonders of technology have<br />

not only improved man’s material lot but have also “increased his security and released him from the<br />

bondage of his bare existence” (p. 101), he seems oblivious to the reality that, despite America’s postwar<br />

economic boom, this was not a time of political security but rather of what W. H. Auden, in a poem<br />

published in 1947, christened the “age of anxiety.” It is as though, having himself been implicated first in<br />

the discovery and then in the use of atomic weapons, Bush is unable to grasp the cataclysmic potential of<br />

the “strange destructive gadgets” he and his colleagues have, as though in a fulfillment of Mary Shelley’s<br />

prophecy in her Romantic tale of the mad scientist Dr. Victor Frankenstein, “brought into existence” in<br />

their laboratories. Seen from this vantage point, Bush’s paper, prescient though it is in its anticipation of<br />

the Internet and other breakthroughs in the technological domain, takes on its greatest significance as a<br />

symptom of an anxiety exposed in the poetry of Auden and Sophocles but that he himself, as a scientist, is<br />

forced to repress—namely, that the same powers of the human mind that, as Bush affirms so eloquently, in<br />

“the speed of action, the intricacy of trails, the detail of mental pictures,” make it “awe-inspiring beyond<br />

all else in nature” (p. 106), are also what have brought us to the brink of collective annihilation and to the<br />

irreversible dissolution of, in Shakespeare’s words from <strong>The</strong> Tempest, “the great Globe itself, / Yea, all<br />

which it inherit.”<br />

Still, Bush’s blindness to the dark side of scientific progress is matched by his capacity—no less<br />

astonishing than that of Benjamin—to envision a future that has become our present. Bush focuses on the<br />

challenges posed by the rapidly accelerating accumulation of human knowledge, which is of little benefit<br />

if it cannot be accessed by those who seek it. As he sets forth the problem, “publication has been extended<br />

far beyond our present ability to make real use of the record. <strong>The</strong> summation of human experience is<br />

being expanded at a prodigious rate, and the means we use for threading through the consequent maze to<br />

the momentarily important item is the same as was used in the days of square-rigged ships” (p. 102). But,<br />

as he notes—and everyone who has watched the steadily dropping prices of computers, cell phones, and<br />

practically all other electronic products would have to agree—“the world has arrived at an age of cheap<br />

181<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

complex devices of great reliability, and something is bound to come of it” (p. 102).<br />

Like Benjamin, Bush instances photography as a centerpiece of the technological changes that will<br />

continue to transform human life. Proposing a thought experiment, he conjures up for his mid-twentieth-<br />

century reader “the camera hound of the future” who “wears on his forehead a lump a little larger than a<br />

walnut” (p. 102). Inside of this protuberance, “there is film . . . for a hundred exposures,” and Bush notes<br />

that “it would be advantageous to be able to snap the camera and look at the picture immediately” (p.<br />

103). Continuing his experiment, Bush imagines that “the Encyclopedia Britannica could be reduced to<br />

the volume of a matchbox” (p. 103), and he goes so far as to recognize the indispensability of wireless<br />

technology in picturing “a future investigator in his laboratory” whose “hands are free, and he is not<br />

anchored” (p. 104), as he moves about and simultaneously photographs his observations and dictates his<br />

comments into a recorder, which are then synchronized with his visual images. Bush’s futuristic vision<br />

culminates in what he calls the “memex,” which he defines as a “mechanized file and library,” that is, “a<br />

device in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized<br />

so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is,” Bush continues, “an enlarged<br />

supplement to his memory” (pp. 106-7).<br />

In the version of Bush’s article published in Life magazine, illustrations of both the walnut-sized camera<br />

and the memex are included, the latter of which is clearly what we would now recognize as a desktop<br />

computer. Bush describes it as consisting of a desk, on top of which “are slanting translucent screens, on<br />

which materials can be projected for convenient reading. <strong>The</strong>re is a keyboard, and sets of buttons and<br />

levers” (p. 107). Bush has, therefore, forecast not only the personal computer and the digital camera but<br />

also, as we have seen, the extent to which so much of contemporary communication is hands-free or<br />

wireless. Even the electronically downloaded book is anticipated when Bush details how, on the memex,<br />

the user, by moving one of its levers, “runs through the book before him,” and “can add marginal notes<br />

and comments” to the text being viewed on the screen, while the guiding principle of the Windows<br />

operating system is reflected in Bush’s statement that since there are “several projection positions,” the<br />

operator of the memex “can leave one item in position while he calls up another” (p. 107).<br />

But though Bush accurately predicts so much of the contemporary world, our reality has outstripped his<br />

imagination in at least one respect. Despite the fact that his miniature camera allows the user to see the<br />

picture immediately, as is the case with digital equipment, Bush’s conception of “microphotography”<br />

(p. 103) still relies on film, and hence he has not fully made the transition from modernism to<br />

postmodernism or, in Baudrillard’s terms, from second-order to third-order simulation. But this limitation<br />

is inconsequential when compared to his most profound insight, which is, as I have already noted, that it is<br />

not enough to be able simply to improve how records are made and stored if one does not at the same time<br />

182


tackle the problem of how this vast “summation of human experience” is to be accessed and consulted.<br />

With respect to what we would call today the “search engine,” Bush makes the point that the human<br />

mind works not by artificial systems of indexing, whether alphabetical or numerical, but rather by “the<br />

association of thoughts, in accordance with some intricate web of trails carried by the cells of the brain”<br />

(p. 106). It is this realization that gives rise to Bush’s panegyric to the faculty of memory as “awe-inspiring<br />

beyond all else in nature.” If we set aside Bush’s assumption that the memex must utilize microfilm and<br />

instead read back into his description our contemporary awareness of the Internet, this makes only the<br />

more astonishing his recognition that the “essential feature” of his futuristic invention is its capacity for<br />

“associative indexing,” whereby “any item may be caused at will to select immediately and automatically<br />

another” (p. 107). Thus, when we have purchased or even simply viewed a book on Amazon, this principle<br />

allows the computer to suggest other books we might also like to consider ordering. What is more, just<br />

as the mind lays down memory traces based on intricate webs of association, so, too, in the memex<br />

“numerous items” can be “joined together to form a trail,” and—as Freud said of the neuronal networks<br />

in the unconscious—these “trails do not fade” (p. 107). Indeed, despite his assumption throughout most<br />

of his paper that the memex will employ a material substance such as microfilm, Bush concludes by<br />

proposing that, just as information is transmitted between nerve cells and the brain by means of “electrical<br />

vibrations,” so, too, it is possible to imagine that in the technology of the future it will not always be<br />

necessary to “transform to mechanical movements in order to proceed from one electrical phenomenon<br />

to another” (p. 108). Here Bush achieves the conceptual turn to postmodernism, as data conveyed<br />

electronically are no longer confined to any physical space, in a way that would allow us to distinguish an<br />

original from a copy, but are rather set free in a virtual universe comprised entirely of simulacra in which<br />

we have, in Valéry’s phrase, completed the “conquest of ubiquity.”<br />

But if we now pause and reflect critically on Bush’s essay as a whole, what lingers even more indelibly<br />

in the reader’s mind than his gifts as a visionary is, as I have argued, his blindness to the dark side of<br />

scientific progress. It is as though, like the Victorian Jebb, he has translated Sophocles’ word δεινῶς only<br />

as “wonder,” and left out its antithetical meaning of man as something “fearful” or “terrible.” In his final<br />

paragraph Bush proclaims that “the applications of science have built man a well-supplied house, and<br />

are teaching him to live healthily therein” (p. 108). But if, as both Sophocles and Heidegger ask us to<br />

remember, it is only from death that human beings cannot escape, it is precisely this tragic awareness that<br />

has been “forgotten” by Bush—forgotten in the sense of being actively repressed from consciousness.<br />

And the death that confronts us is not merely of each of us as an individual but, for the first time in human<br />

history, that of our entire species—indeed, of all living species—a specter unleashed and symbolized by<br />

the “strange destructive gadgets” that are the demonic counterparts of the angelic memex. In diametric<br />

opposition to Bush, from Heidegger’s perspective man dwells not in the “well-supplied house” of science<br />

183<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

but rather in the realm of the uncanny that “is the basic kind of Being-in-the <strong>World</strong>, even though in an<br />

everyday way it has been covered up.” 6 And if the notion that any kind of technology can teach us to “live<br />

healthily” is itself a delusion—a symptom of the mass psychosis that has put the entire planet in peril—it<br />

may be up to an enhanced respect for nature, cultivated by receptivity to the aura emitted by works of art<br />

embedded in a tradition, to save us.<br />

4<br />

Thomas L. Friedman, the three-time Pulitzer-Prize-winning columnist for <strong>The</strong> New York Times, begins<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>World</strong> Is Flat, the first of his two recent books on globalization and the fate of America and the world<br />

in the twenty-first century, by recounting a visit to Infosys, a leading information technology company<br />

headquartered outside Bangalore, India. It was here, upon pondering the statement by the CEO of the<br />

company that “the playing field is being leveled” in the global economy due to the revolutionary changes<br />

made possible by the emergence of a worldwide communication network, that Friedman came to the<br />

realization encapsulated in the title of his book, <strong>The</strong> <strong>World</strong> Is Flat; and he describes himself as being at<br />

that moment “filled with both excitement and dread.” 7<br />

That Friedman should have experienced in himself these antithetical emotions is not surprising since,<br />

though he does not use the word, they mark his entry into the twilight zone of the uncanny that, as has<br />

been my contention throughout these reflections, is integral to the surpassing power of the mind that<br />

makes human beings “the strangest of all” creatures. By way of conclusion, therefore, I shall first show<br />

how Friedman’s analysis of globalization in <strong>The</strong> <strong>World</strong> Is Flat extends the inquiry into the inherent<br />

ambiguity of technological progress of which the essays by Walter Benjamin and Vannevar Bush are<br />

landmarks for their respective eras; then I shall compare Friedman’s fundamentally optimistic vision in<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>World</strong> Is Flat to the far more sober assessment of where we are headed as a species and a planet that<br />

emerges from his sequel, Hot, Flat, and Crowded, published only four years later, in 2008.<br />

Among the striking points of contact between Friedman and both Benjamin and Bush is that Friedman,<br />

too, cites photography as an example of the transformations in everyday life that have been wrought<br />

by the latest advances in technology, though Friedman, unlike Benjamin, is referring not to mechanical<br />

reproduction but rather to digitization; and he therefore is able to experience in actuality what Bush<br />

6 Martin Heidegger, Being and Time (1927), trans. John Macquerrie and Edward Robinson (Oxford: Blackwell, 1973), p.<br />

322.<br />

7 Thomas L. Friedman, <strong>The</strong> <strong>World</strong> Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux,<br />

2004), pp. 7-8. Subsequent page references will be given parenthetically.<br />

184


could only see as a possibility on the horizon. As Friedman reports, not only is mail now something that<br />

one sends digitally from a computer rather than on paper through a post office, but the same is true for<br />

photography:<br />

Photography used to be a cumbersome process involving film coated with silver dug up from<br />

mines halfway across the world. I used to take some pictures with my camera, then bring the film<br />

to the drugstore to be sent off to a big plant somewhere for processing. But once the Internet made<br />

it possible to send pictures around the world, attached to or in e-mails, I didn’t want to use the<br />

silver film anymore. I wanted to take pictures in the digital format, which could be uploaded, not<br />

developed (And by the way, I didn’t want to be confined to using a camera to take them. I wanted<br />

to be able to use my cell phone to do it.) (pp. 64-65).<br />

Similarly, just as for Bush the user of the memex possesses an “enlarged supplement to his memory”<br />

that makes accessible the “summation of human experience,” which can be “consulted with exceeding<br />

speed and flexibility,” so, too, Friedman quotes Jimmy Wales, the originator of Wikipedia, as saying that<br />

he has “one simple goal: to give ‘every single person free access to the sum of all human knowledge” (p.<br />

95). Not to be outdone, it is likewise the aim of the search engine Google—the name of which is derived<br />

from the word “googol,” which means 1 followed by 100 zeros—as stated on its home page, “to organize<br />

the immense, seemingly infinite amount of information on the Web,’ just for you” (pp. 152-53). And<br />

just as Bush recognized that the “essential feature” of the memex would be its capacity for “associative<br />

indexing,” whereby “any item may be caused at will to select immediately and automatically another,” in<br />

consonance with the requirements of the user, so too, as Friedman points out, “the key breakthrough that<br />

enabled Google to become first among search engines was its ability to combine its PageRank technology<br />

with an analysis of page content, which determines which pages are most relevant to the specific search<br />

being conducted” (pp. 154-55).<br />

At the most general level, Friedman’s argument in <strong>The</strong> <strong>World</strong> Is Flat is that what he dubs the “triple<br />

convergence”—of the collapse of the Soviet Union along with the rise of Internet technology, of new<br />

ways of doing business, and of several billion new competitors in the global marketplace—has produced<br />

a transformation in contemporary life. As he summarizes his thesis, “It is this triple convergence—of new<br />

players, on a new playing field, developing new processes and habits for horizontal collaboration—that<br />

I believe is the most important force shaping global economics and politics in the twenty-first century”<br />

(pp. 181-82). According to Friedman, the interconnected changes that came to a head at the turn of our<br />

present century have inaugurated the third great era of globalization. Globalization 1.0, he says, lasted<br />

from 1492, when Columbus opened trade between the Old <strong>World</strong> and the New <strong>World</strong>, to approximately<br />

1800, and was driven by the power of nations. Globalization 2.0 extended from 1800 to 2000 and was<br />

185<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

spurred by multinational companies, which profited first from falling transportation and then from falling<br />

telecommunications costs. Finally, Globalization 3.0, which commenced around the year 2000, derives<br />

its unique character, in Friedman’s view, from “the newfound power for individuals to collaborate and<br />

compete globally,” thanks not to horsepower or hardware but to software, “in conjunction with the<br />

creation of a global fiber-optic network that has made us all neighbors” (p. 10).<br />

Although formulated independently, Friedman’s analysis of the three eras of globalization dovetails with<br />

Baudrillard’s schema of the three orders of simulation, and it helps to elucidate the connection between<br />

economic and political developments and changes in the theory and practice of representation. Ever the<br />

realist, Friedman reminds his readers of the dangers of nuclear terrorism and the ways that the resources<br />

of the Internet can be exploited by the forces of darkness as well as of light. Still, the predominant<br />

tenor of Friedman’s outlook toward globalization in <strong>The</strong> <strong>World</strong> Is Flat is resolutely optimistic, to the<br />

point that he seems much closer in spirit to Vannevar Bush than to Walter Benjamin, to say nothing of<br />

Martin Heidegger. Thus, Friedman stresses how the newly “flattened” world gives “newfound power”<br />

to individuals rather than to states or to corporations, and he sees the fundamentally benign and wealth-<br />

producing changes brought about by digital technology as “the most important force shaping global<br />

economics and politics in the twenty-first century.” Indeed, as he writes at the close of his book, playing<br />

on the coincidence that the attack on the <strong>World</strong> Trade Center took place on 9/11/01, whereas the opening<br />

of the Berlin Wall took place on 11/9/89: “the two greatest dangers we Americans face are an excess of<br />

protectionism—excessive fears of another 9/11 that prompt us to wall ourselves in, in search of personal<br />

security—and excessive fears of competing in a world of 11/9 that prompt us to wall ourselves off, in<br />

search of economic security. Both would be a disaster for us and for the world” (p. 469).<br />

It is not necessary to dispute Friedman’s defense of free trade to question his assertions that the “two<br />

greatest dangers” facing Americans are economic and political protectionism. Surely both the United<br />

States and the world are in far deeper trouble than that, and the sense of uncanniness that led Friedman to<br />

describe himself as filled with “dread” as well as “excitement” during his visit to Infosys in Bangalore,<br />

India, invites closer scrutiny as a symptom of an existential malaise that returns us to the unflinching<br />

meditations on Sophocles’ choral ode in Antigone by both Heidegger and Hölderlin.<br />

As his titles makes plain, Friedman’s understanding of the dangers facing humankind in the twenty-first<br />

century has undergone a profound evolution between <strong>The</strong> <strong>World</strong> Is Flat and Hot, Flat, and Crowded. In<br />

place of the “triple convergence” of new economic actors, new technologies, and new forms of “horizontal<br />

collaboration,” Friedman now underscores how the technological revolution that has “leveled the global<br />

playing field” cannot be isolated from “two other enormously powerful forces” that “are impacting our<br />

planet in fundamental ways,” namely, “global warming and soaring population growth.” As Friedman<br />

186


sums up his revised thesis, distilled in the three adjectives of his title, it is “actually the convergence of<br />

global warming, global flattening, and global crowding that is the most important dynamic shaping the<br />

world we live in today.” 8 Instead of referring to the present age as Globalization 3.0, Friedman now terms<br />

our epoch the Energy-Climate Era.<br />

A few of the statistics included by Friedman in Hot, Flat, and Crowded suffice to tell us most of what we<br />

need to know. <strong>The</strong> population of the world, which stood at 2.5 billion in 1950, is now over 6.7 billion,<br />

and is projected to grow by 2050 to 9.2 billion—an increase equivalent to the total number of people on<br />

earth as recently as 1950. Almost all of this growth, moreover, will take place in less developed regions (p.<br />

28). Roughly one quarter of the world’s people, moreover, still do not have regular access to an electricity<br />

grid (p. 155). By 2100, temperatures worldwide are expected to rise between 3 and 5 degrees Celsius—or<br />

5.4 and 9 degrees Fahrenheit—over preindustrial conditions, with catastrophic increases in sea levels,<br />

droughts, and floods as consequences (p. 44). Even now, one species is going extinct every twenty<br />

minutes, which is one thousand times faster than in the past (p. 141). Since the Industrial Revolution,<br />

the amount of carbon dioxide in the earth’s atmosphere has shot up from 280 parts per million to 384<br />

ppm, which is higher than it has ever been in twenty million years, and, if present trends continue, we are<br />

projected to reach as much as 560 ppm by 2050, and an unthinkable 800 ppm by 2075 (pp. 119, 212).<br />

Although avoiding this death spiral would require “a huge global industrial energy project” (p. 212), at the<br />

present time the United States invests a meager eight billion dollars—equivalent to the cost of nine days<br />

of fighting in Iraq—in research and development in energy, or only 0.8 percent of its revenues in a one-<br />

trillion-dollar-a-year industry (p. 185).<br />

Taking a synoptic view, the underlying problem is that we have created a vicious spiral, in which, as<br />

Friedman puts it, “rapid economic growth and population expansion—flat meets crowded—is driving<br />

the destruction of forests and other ecosystems at an unprecedented rate. <strong>The</strong> destruction of these forests<br />

and biodiversity-rich environments, in turn, contributes to climate change—flat and crowded meet hot<br />

and make it hotter—by releasing more carbon into the atmosphere” (p. 301). Hence, Friedman adds,<br />

“when it comes to climate change, human society has been like the proverbial frog in the pail on the<br />

stove, where the heat gets turned up very slightly every hour, so the frog never thinks to jump out. It<br />

just keeps adjusting until it gets boiled to death” (p. 48). One of the most profound insights to emerge<br />

from Friedman’s analysis is that, in contrast to the traditional notion of human beings as the masters of<br />

creation, the truth is that “we are the only species in this vast web of life that no animal or plant in nature<br />

8 Thomas L. Friedman, Hot, Flat, and Crowded: Why We Need a Green Revolution and How It Can Renew America (New<br />

York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2008), p. 26. Subsequent page references will be given parenthetically. I sometimes<br />

omit the names of the sources quoted by Friedman in my own citations from his work.<br />

187<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

depends on for its survival—yet we depend on this whole web of life for our survival” (p. 152). Tragically,<br />

however, although no other species depends on us for its survival, as we depend on nature, we do possess<br />

the power to destroy not only ourselves but also much of the life on the planet, whether through a nuclear<br />

cataclysm or through the slow burn of irreversible global climate disruption.<br />

What, then, are we to do about this grim picture? Although Friedman declares himself “a sober optimist”<br />

(p. 411), I think the truth concerning climate change is better expressed in the words of Harvard<br />

climatologist John Holdren: “<strong>The</strong> more aspects of the problem you know something about, the more<br />

pessimistic you are” (p. 125). What is clear, above all, is that it is no longer possible to reverse course<br />

by tinkering around the edges of the problem or through the efforts of individuals alone, however<br />

important these may be. Rather, what is required is a massive worldwide effort, led by the United States<br />

and seconded by China, “to replace the Dirty Fuels System with a Clean Energy System,” a radical<br />

transformation in our collective way of life that Friedman calls “a green revolution” (p. 199).<br />

Perhaps the greatest single obstacle to this change in systems is the lack of political will in the United<br />

States, a condition of lethargy and moral blindness that made even the recent modest reforms in our health<br />

care system a feat of Herculean proportions, and that seems likely to doom any efforts at comprehensive<br />

energy and climate legislation for the foreseeable future. Unless the United States is prepared to wean<br />

itself of its dependency on fossil fuels and make massive investments in clean-energy technology, it will<br />

be simply impossible for other countries to break the vicious spiral of an increasingly hotter, flatter, and<br />

more crowded world; and I see, alas, little evidence to justify optimism in any form.<br />

Still, one can continue to make the arguments in hopes of changing people’s minds. <strong>The</strong>re are, I think,<br />

two fundamental points to be made. <strong>The</strong> first is pragmatic. It is that, in the words of one of Friedman’s<br />

authorities, “Mother Nature has not been fooled” (p. 260). Traditionally, capitalism has functioned by<br />

treating environmental waste as what economists term an “externality,” that is, a cost of doing business<br />

that is not borne by any of the parties involved in the transaction, and hence could be simply ignored. But<br />

now we are coming up against the limits imposed by “the ecological logic of capitalism” (p. 57). Thus, as<br />

another of Friedman’s sources explains, “Socialism collapsed because it did not allow the market to tell<br />

the economic truth. Capitalism may collapse because it does not allow the market to tell the ecological<br />

truth” (p. 259). This is why the only solution to our problems lies in government regulation of the market,<br />

to begin forcing business and consumers alike to bear the true costs of their carbon footprints, as well as in<br />

providing support at the federal level for clean-energy technologies. Given the entrenched resistance in the<br />

United States to “big government” and higher taxes, however, it is again difficult for me to see how there<br />

is any chance of a major course correction while there is still time.<br />

188


<strong>The</strong> second point is moral and spiritual. Ultimately, as Friedman eloquently pleads, “the deepest truth of<br />

all” is that love for the environment “is a value that needs to be preserved in and of itself, not because it<br />

makes your bank account richer but because it makes life richer and always has” (p. 314). Whereas in<br />

political conflicts, such as the space race, there may be winners and losers, “in the earth race either we<br />

will all win or all lose” (p. 366), because a disaster in one country is a disaster for the entire world. Thus,<br />

for any country to “go green,” it must be “committed to the idea that there is something bigger than itself,<br />

its own community, and its own borders—that the state of the world really matters too” (p. 180). For the<br />

United States to embrace such an ethic of energy efficiency and environmental conversation would be a<br />

sign of humility that would, in turn, enable it to regain much of the moral authority it has squandered in<br />

recent decades, most egregiously by the invasion of Iraq in a tragically misguided response to the terrorist<br />

attacks of September 11, 2001.<br />

<strong>The</strong> dilemma we face as human beings is that the interests on whose behalf an appeal is most urgently<br />

needed—nature, children, and the future—are those with the least power and influence on their side. That<br />

is why, as Friedman argues, quoting the words of Rob Watson, CEO of EcoTech International and “one of<br />

the best environmental minds in America” (p. 6), our most precious commodity at the present time is “the<br />

one faculty that distinguishes us as human beings—the ability to imagine.” We need imagination, Watson<br />

continues, in order to be able to grasp the impact of “the nonlinear, unmanageable climate events that<br />

could unfold in our lifetime” (p. 119).<br />

And this is where the arts and literature come in. We study the arts, above all, not as a means to a<br />

utilitarian end, but as an end in themselves, as a way of sparking our imaginations and educating ourselves<br />

as whole persons. It follows, therefore, that in order to save nature we also must cherish art, because only<br />

if human beings cultivate the power of imagination and empathy will we continue to have a future to<br />

create. I began by quoting from the first stasimon of Sophocles’ Antigone, precisely because of my belief<br />

that it is from artistic masterpieces that we still have most to learn about the human condition, and that the<br />

essential paradox that makes man at once the most terrible and most wonderful of creatures remains as<br />

true today as it did in ancient Athens, notwithstanding the advances in technology that have profoundly<br />

transformed not only how we experience works of art but also every facet of our material existence.<br />

Although it will be necessary to await future meetings of the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong> to discover<br />

what will have become of the earth in the next fifty or one hundred years, I would like to conclude by<br />

drawing two seemingly antithetical morals from these meditations on the theme of the work of art in<br />

the age of digital technology. <strong>The</strong> first is that science alone can never supply the wisdom that will guide<br />

us in its proper use. To suppose that we can reap the benefits of man’s awe-inspiring power to control<br />

nature without also assuming the dreadful costs of this responsibility is to forget the lesson elucidated<br />

189<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

by Heidegger in his existential reading of Sophocles’ choral ode that “to be the strangest of all is the<br />

basic trait of the human essence,” and there is no escaping the uncanniness that haunts our being at every<br />

moment from its encounter with the finitude of death.<br />

But if science alone cannot save us, it is equally evident that unless we are finally prepared to face the<br />

impact of our collective actions on nature that we will be irrevocably lost as a species. Mother Nature,<br />

Friedman quotes Rob Watson as saying, “is just chemistry, biology, and physics,” and “everything she<br />

does is just the sum of these three things” (p. 139). Given that there is no abrogating the laws of nature,<br />

it is impossible to escape the realization that postmodernism, with its siren song that “there is only the<br />

simulacrum,” is but the mirror image of a naïve faith in science and technology, and must be discarded<br />

as an intellectual luxury we can no longer afford. Indeed, as a byproduct of late capitalism, life inside<br />

the postmodernist bubble is the philosophical counterpart to our addiction to fossil fuels. It can’t go on<br />

forever. In his influential treatise, <strong>The</strong> Postmodern Condition, Jean-François Lyotard states that whereas he<br />

employs the term modern to refer to “any science that legitimates itself with reference to a metadiscourse<br />

. . . making an explicit appeal to some grand narrative,” he defines the postmodern as an “incredulity<br />

toward metanarratives,” and he attributes this skeptical attitude to “progress in the sciences,” which has<br />

replaced the “grand narratives” of the past with “many different language games.” 9<br />

As the synergistically interacting pressures of climate disruption, rising energy consumption, and<br />

exponentially increasing population compel us to recognize, however, it is ultimately the “grand narrative”<br />

of evolution—nature as altered by the feedback loop of human behavior—that will seal the fate of our<br />

unique and irreplaceable planet. In <strong>The</strong> <strong>World</strong> Is Flat, Friedman quotes a passage from <strong>The</strong> Communist<br />

Manifesto, published in 1848, in which Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels reflect on the way that the<br />

Industrial Revolution, impelled by capitalism, has dissolved previous forms of human identity. Marx and<br />

Engels write:<br />

All fixed, fast, frozen relations, with their train of ancient and venerable prejudices and opinions,<br />

are swept away, all new-formed ones become antiquated before they can ossify. All that is solid<br />

melts into air, all that is holy is profaned, and man is at last compelled to face with sober senses his<br />

real conditions of life and his relations with his kind. 10<br />

Everything that Marx and Engels say about the Industrial Revolution, which is synonymous with the age<br />

9 Jean-François Lyotard, <strong>The</strong> Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (1979), trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian<br />

Massumi (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984), pp. xxiii-xiv.<br />

10 Quoted in Friedman, <strong>The</strong> <strong>World</strong> Is Flat, p. 202.<br />

190


of modernism or Baudrillard’s second order of simulation, is even more true for the Energy-Climate era,<br />

which is also the age of postmodernism or the third order of simulation. On the one hand, “all that is solid<br />

melts into air,” as information technology completes the “conquest of ubiquity” and the economic playing<br />

field is leveled. On the other hand, “man is at last compelled to face with sober senses his real conditions<br />

of life and his relations with his kind,” as we have at long last to come to terms with “the ecological<br />

logic of capitalism.” Whether we can marshal the resources of the imagination to face the reality of the<br />

environmental catastrophe that is already upon us, as well as to remove the still-looming threat of nuclear<br />

annihilation, will determine whether—and for how long—there will be creative human beings in the<br />

future.<br />

191<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Illness and Art<br />

Desmond Egan<br />

Irish Poet<br />

‘Madness, frenzy, je ne sais quoi, the sublime, inexplicable, ineffable, unnameable, indefinable,<br />

inexpressible, neuter, trace. <strong>The</strong>se are some of the concepts used in Western culture to recognise<br />

the obscure movement by means of which literature composes itself into a strangely secret body of<br />

language’. 1<br />

Taking Frias Martin’s comment as a summary of the situation, I wish to address the question, Is there a<br />

necessary connection between Literature and ill-health or neurosis. I declare a special interest here, in that<br />

I ask the question as a poet.<br />

A necessary connection, I emphasise; not an accidental one. Art is created by human beings, by people<br />

who have all the limitations that flesh is heir to. This truism should be borne in mind in any discussion of<br />

art and illness - hence my opening quotation from Martins as a summary of popular misconceptions in<br />

the area of art and illness. Some artists, writers, poets will happen to be unhealthy in one way or another.<br />

Illness is part of life. It is an experience which, like any other, may have an influence on the artist. True,<br />

but there is a difference in kind between work undertaken as therapeutic exercise - by patients, say - and<br />

that of, someone like Frieda Kahlo or Gerard Manley Hopkins. <strong>The</strong>y were sufferers, yes, but being artists<br />

they could pierce through their individual problems to some universal perception of a truth.<br />

No one escapes illness, of one kind or another; and all of us have to face up to the deep mystery of death.<br />

Because of his/her intense reaction to things; because of a greater capacity to feel, to understand and to<br />

express, the creative person is somewhat different from others; in some respects an outsider (as Colin<br />

1 Manuel Frias Martins, Em <strong>The</strong>oria / In <strong>The</strong>ory, 2003, Ambar, Lisbon; p. 193.<br />

192


Wilson famously explored); generally more vulnerable. We might expect that a poet, musician, or creative<br />

artist, because of his/her hyper-sensitivity - something well recorded in biographies and anecdotes - would<br />

seem and be more open to neurosis and eccentricity than the average, extrovert, person; and it is probably<br />

so. But to posit a necessary link between creativity and disease is to go too far and to misunderstand the<br />

already mysterious processes of any work of art. This leads, inevitably, to a simplified understanding, a<br />

vulgarisation of the concept, artist.<br />

For this reason, we should address the fundamental question, Is art born out of neurosis? Is there a<br />

necessary link, as is often assumed: the poet or painter as some kind of weirdo, a little crazy; a neurotic<br />

at best? Crucially, the artist is in control of his material/ fantasy/ emotion whereas the neurotic is<br />

controlled by it and is not, therefore, its master. This is the core of the matter - and Lionel Trilling, in his<br />

groundbreaking study, ‘Art and Neurosis’ 2 has pointed out as much, more than 60 years ago.<br />

Our emphasis on the question of control does not mean that we should overlook the fact that in creating,<br />

the artist gains some kind of release - as one does from doing anything well. Shakespeare suggests as<br />

much, as does his near-contemporary, John Donne (1572 - 1651), and quite explicitly, in his poem <strong>The</strong><br />

Triple Foole:<br />

I thought, if I could draw my paines<br />

Through Rime’s vexation, I should them allay.<br />

Griefe brought to numbers cannot be so fierce,<br />

For, he tames it, that fetters it in verse.<br />

Yes - but, let us not overlook the phrase ‘he tames it’, nor the verb ‘fetters’. <strong>The</strong>y emphasise the crucial<br />

issue of the poet’s taming or controlling the feeling rather than of being controlled by it.<br />

This, too, is surely why genuine art has something salvific to offer not only to the creator but to a suffering<br />

world, a world consumed by false values, a world that has lost its way and its nerve. Such relief, however,<br />

as Donne himself makes clear, is incidental to the creation, not descriptive of it. At this stage, may I be<br />

allowed to refer to a personal situation. Asked by an Amnesty group to write a poem for Peace, 3 I became<br />

convinced that at the heart of the world’s search for peace lies the conflict between what is beautiful, in<br />

nature as in art, as against the neurosis of fear, of pride, and of excess - so what I wrote, for whatever it is<br />

worth, became an attempt to express both the healing beauty of the ordinary and the conflict which denies<br />

2 Lionel Trilling, Art and Neurosis (USA, 1949).<br />

3 C.f. Egan, Elegies, Goldsmith, Kildare, (1996).<br />

193<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

so much of the world that contact with nature:<br />

PEACE<br />

just to go for a walk out the road<br />

just that<br />

under the deep trees<br />

which whisper of peace<br />

to break the bread of words<br />

with someone passing<br />

just that<br />

four of us round a pram<br />

and baby fingers asleep<br />

just to join the harmony<br />

the fields the blue everyday hills<br />

the puddles of daylight and<br />

you might hear a pheasant<br />

echo through the woods<br />

or plover may waver by<br />

as the evening poises with a blackbird<br />

on its table of hedge<br />

just that<br />

and here and there a gate<br />

a bungalow’s bright window<br />

the smell of woodsmoke of lives<br />

just that<br />

but sweet Christ that<br />

is more than most can afford<br />

with the globe still platted in its own<br />

crown of thorns<br />

194


too many starving eyes<br />

too many ancient children<br />

squatting among flies<br />

too many stockpiles of fear<br />

too many dog jails too many generals<br />

too many under torture by the impotent<br />

screaming into the air we breathe<br />

too many dreams stuck in money jams<br />

too many mountains of butter selfishness<br />

too many poor drowning in the streets<br />

too many shantytowns on the outskirts of life<br />

too many of us not sure what we want<br />

so that we try to feed a habit for everything<br />

until the ego puppets the militaries<br />

mirror our own warring face<br />

too little peace<br />

At this stage, perhaps we should consider the use of some of the artistic disciplines, such as painting,<br />

writing, sculpture.. as healing exercise? <strong>The</strong>rapeutic writing that is caught up in illness of one kind or<br />

another may be valuable as a kenosis, an emptying or getting rid of some mental or physical ailment<br />

- but it cannot of itself offer the energetic shaping of human experience, the plerosis, which true art<br />

exemplifies. <strong>The</strong> root of all neurosis, Norman Mailer once suggested in an interview, is cowardice, that<br />

is, an unwillingness or an inability to face up to reality. <strong>The</strong>rapeutic work may well help in this area but it<br />

is a different thing from artistic creativity. <strong>The</strong> latter always offers that confrontation which is part of its<br />

essence: all art is a confrontation, with no holds barred. Again, we are talking about somehow controlling<br />

experience rather than being controlled by it.<br />

This is the core of what I have to say. Any discussion about art and the artist must begin from a<br />

recognition of the basic gift of an artist: the ability, no matter what his/her personal human problems are,<br />

to shape experience in tranquillity, as William Wordsworth suggested, that peculiar tranquillity which<br />

can accommodate and objectify an expression of some aspect of the mystery of life. We do not deny the<br />

carpenter or electrician his craft; we must not deny the artist his/her peculiar gift and the fearlessness at<br />

its heart. <strong>The</strong> admonition most often given by Jesus Christ was, ‘Do not be afraid.’ Not even of dying: his<br />

195<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

was a call to a world obsessed, at root, with death. <strong>The</strong> artist in his creativeness is not afraid. <strong>The</strong>rapeusis<br />

for those who are unwell may be fine and even necessary but we only create confusion by making false<br />

claims for it or by confusing its productions with something completely different. Part of the problem in<br />

distinguishing the valuable from the superficial in art nowadays lies precisely in such confusion.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fearlessness of the artist, his/her willingness to pierce through the temporary, the death-bound, so as<br />

to arrive at something of permanent truth, would seem important to confront the disease of fear. And that<br />

is why the therapy of genuine Art is so valuable for us all, and why mankind has always had its art and its<br />

artists. I do not say that art is useful basically as a therapy - though it may well be; I do say that Art is a<br />

kind of medicine. I do say that it and only it can offer the katharsis (catharsis) of pity and terror of which<br />

Aristotle speaks in his Poetics 4 : that peculiar feeling of enlargement as humans which we experience even<br />

in viewing a tragic drama. <strong>The</strong> release which comes from coming in contact with the expression of some<br />

emotionally charged insight - and therefore with the control of emotion.<br />

What Aristotle teaches us about dramatic tragedy is relevant to our experience of any of the other arts.<br />

Through our vicarious encounter with some profound issue; through the creator’s battle to understand and<br />

to express it and, in so doing, to discover something permanent in the face of all that is passing, we can<br />

gain a deeper insight into life, a greater compassion, and even, perhaps, a greater strength in facing up to<br />

death itself. As John Donne puts it in his wonderful poem, Death, Be Not Proud,<br />

One short sleepe past, wee wake eternally,<br />

And death shall be no more; death, thou shalt die.<br />

One way or another, art offers some kind of eternal awakening.<br />

<strong>The</strong> world is full of physically or mentally sick people - but there are very few poets. If poetry is merely<br />

the outcome of disease, how explain this? How explain, for example, what Matisse said of Renoir in old<br />

age, after arthritis had caught hold of his fingers, gone so swollen and distorted that he had to tie the brush<br />

to his hand to hold it,<br />

While his body wasted away, his soul seemed to gain strength and he expressed himself with<br />

increasing ease. 5<br />

4 Aristotle, Poetics, 6, 1449 b.<br />

5 Quoted in Sandblom, Creativity and Disease, London 1992; p. IV.<br />

196


Art is a going-inland, to take Patrick Kavanagh’s phrase 6 ; a seeing into the heart of things coupled with the<br />

ability to express this life-complexity, be it in musical, poetic, visual, sculptural, theatrical or film form.<br />

Such an act demands great psychic energy and the full commitment of someone who, by refining his/her<br />

talent, has achieved a personal style adequate to,<br />

snatch out of time the passionate transitory 7<br />

<strong>The</strong> artist, in personal life, may be diseased, neurotic, even a little crazy - but in his art he is whole and full<br />

of energy. Nietzsche somewhere remarks that all art is positive, an affirmation; optimistic at heart. It is the<br />

very opposite of sickness or madness, though the intense demands it makes may at times drive a hyper-<br />

sensitive person towards ill-health.<br />

And the artist, by definition, is hyper-sensitive, more vulnerable, never ‘quite fully at home’, as Rilke<br />

puts it, 8 in the hurly burly of everyday mindless living. Easily misunderstood, an outsider, to one degree<br />

or another; never quite fitting-in. For that reason, he will often be considered eccentric, a weirdo, slightly<br />

mad. But in the moment of creation, no one is saner, more wholly attuned to life, than the artist.<br />

Nor will he depend on the approbation of any audience more knowing than that of himself. Here we have<br />

the difference between a creative person and a dilettante. <strong>The</strong> history of Literature is littered with the<br />

stories of those who died unknown, under-appreciated, rejected by the outside world and often poverty-<br />

stricken - Hopkins, Kavanagh, McKenna, Pessoa, Mangan, Kafka... but who nevertheless persisted in<br />

their work, sustained by a belief in it and by the thrill of making it. Ars gratia artis: literary achievement is<br />

not defined by acceptance; au contraire: what fires the writer is, as Gerard Manley Hopkins puts it in his<br />

last poem, 9<br />

<strong>The</strong> fine delight that fathers thought...<br />

<strong>The</strong> roll, the rise, the carol, the creation<br />

Take the case of Hopkins; what he achieved in his poetry; where it came from; what it shows us about<br />

the suggested link between Art and Neurosis; and most of all, what we gain from his work. Much<br />

emphasis has been given - utterly disproportionately, in my opinion - to the sick melancholy of Gerard<br />

6 Patrick Kavanagh, <strong>The</strong> Complete Poems, Goldsmith, Kildare, 1984.<br />

7 Patrick Kavanagh, op cit.<br />

8 Rilke, <strong>The</strong> Duino Elegies, no.1, Selected Poems tr. Leishman, Penguin, London, 1964.<br />

9 Gerard Manley Hopkins, To R.B.<br />

197<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Manley Hopkins(1884-1889) during his last five and a half years in Ireland. 10 Those who do so, choose<br />

to see his ‘terrible’ sonnets as purely autographical, making the most basic of academic mistakes since a<br />

distinction always, and willy nilly, exists between the protagonist in any writing and its creator: ‘I’ is never<br />

‘just I’. Parallel to that, the strange integrity of an artistic theme, its amalgam of memory, imagination,<br />

thought, feeling - the mysterious, core of a poem - is being treated as somehow akin to a journalistic<br />

record of personal experience. To see Hopkins’s version of Job’s lament, Thou Art Indeed Just, Lord,<br />

as an autographical outpouring of near-despair, a neurotic expression of personal suffering, is to miss<br />

the point. Its amazing energy, its virtuosity of language, its mastery of the resources of poetry... are all<br />

expressions of vitality rather than of sickness; of belief, rather than of despair. Schiller once remarked that<br />

‘All art is dedicated to joy’ (‘Alle Kunst ist der Freude gewidmet’). Nietzsche offered a similar insight<br />

when he maintained that there is no such thing as pessimistic art, since all art is an affirmation of some<br />

kind of belief in life. To create a poem that is a poem takes enormous psychic energy. Those who harp on<br />

Hopkins’s sickness during those last Dublin years mostly overlook that. Nor have they any explanation<br />

for the magnificently affirmative sonnet, That Nature Is A Heraclitean Fire (And Of <strong>The</strong> Comfort Of <strong>The</strong><br />

Resurrection), written a year before he died. It concludes with the powerful affirmation of those lines,<br />

And this Jack, joke, poor potsherd, patch, matchwood, immortal diamond, Is immortal diamond.<br />

What, then, about Hopkins’s ‘sonnets of desolation’ (as W.H. Gardner labelled them), all of which he<br />

wrote in Dublin? As a writer, I can tell you how Hopkins felt after the outpouring of doubt and grief and<br />

almost (but not quite) despair that each of these wonderful poems embodies: he felt great! <strong>The</strong>se ‘dark<br />

sonnets’ should be called ‘sonnets of hope’. For a start, not a single one of them declines into hopelessness.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y are full of energy, itself a kind of belief. <strong>The</strong>y also exemplify the flowering of his poetic genius in a<br />

crowning virtuosity of technique, despite the extremes of depression that Hopkins explores and catches in<br />

them. Take, at random, a few of the ‘darkest’, most anguished lines from one of these ‘dark sonnets’, No<br />

Worst, <strong>The</strong>re Is None:<br />

O the mind, mind has mountains. Cliffs of fall<br />

Frightful. Sheer. No man fathomed. Hold them cheap<br />

May who never felt their steep or deep.<br />

Technically, this writing is exciting, fresh, and inventive. One is struck by the force of that repeated word<br />

‘mind’; by the compound adjective, ‘no-man-fathomed’ - a neologism and wonderfully evocative; by<br />

10 C.f. Norman White, Hopkins in Ireland, (Dublin:UCD, 2002).<br />

198


the assonantal play of ‘steep’/ ‘deep’; the mountain imagery itself with its ‘cliffs of fall’ is an amazingly<br />

suggestive metaphor, one which he develops with an inventiveness worthy of Shakespeare and so on.<br />

Such mastery of the capacities of language is what helps to make possible this sonnet’s unflinching look<br />

at the human tragedy. Even those harrowing lines quoted are energised by a a belief in language itself and<br />

in the sacred function of poetry, which is to catch life on the wing. <strong>The</strong> poem is charged with belief, with a<br />

refusal to give up in the face of extreme anguish. With hope,<br />

Here! creep,<br />

Wretch, under a comfort serves in a whirlwind: all<br />

Life death does end and each day dies with sleep.<br />

Not very cheering, I agree, but he does look-for and mention, some kind of ‘comfort’ (this for a third time<br />

in the poem); and gives it weight at the finish. No tagged-on cliché or easy way out, no superficial formula<br />

- and yet, some kind of affirmation in living-on. This writing is not the product of neurosis.<br />

We need such poetry because it manages to catch in a few words the experience of struggling along<br />

in dark times, while refusing to cave-in. This is a hope sonnet, hope not least in poetry itself and in its<br />

resources, including those of rhythm, musicality, metaphorical reach. Hope, fundamentally, in the Word<br />

- for a Christian, the Lord of language and of creativity. <strong>The</strong> poem includes a cry to <strong>The</strong> Holy Spirit as<br />

Comforter and to Mary, ‘mother of us’. - and it finishes on a note of patience. St. Ignatius in his Spiritual<br />

Exercises advises,<br />

Let him who is in desolation strive to remain in patience, which is the virtue contrary to the<br />

troubles which harass him 11 . Interestingly, Hopkins wrote Patience, Hard Thing, in the spring of the<br />

following year.<br />

In his last poem, To R.B., written in April 1889, Hopkins acknowledges the energy necessary to write,<br />

with aim<br />

Now known and hand at work now never wrong.<br />

Sweet fire the sire of muse, my soul needs this;<br />

My aim in this short Lecture is to defend for Poetry the psychic wellbeing which it demands; to<br />

11 Quoted in Mackenzie, <strong>The</strong> Poetical Works of Gerard Manley Hopkins, OUP, Oxford, 1992; p. 460.<br />

199<br />

Session 2


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

acknowledge that it takes shape in spite of, not because of, whatever limitation or illness the creator may<br />

be enduring. Or may not. Magnificently, art derives from energy, not from illness. Philip Sandblom, in his<br />

study, ‘Creativity and Disease’ reaches the same conclusion, 12<br />

In great artists, the passion to create generates a willpower strong enough to defy the worst disease.<br />

So, if we need art and its affirmation, what are we to make of the position of the arts in to-day’s world?<br />

A recent issue of the Swiss Pro Helvetia journal, Passages, asks, 13<br />

Is the allegedly art-loving public staying away from artistic events in droves?<br />

<strong>The</strong> answer, as anyone involved in the arts would agree, would seem to be Yes. Classical concerts are,<br />

for the most part, poorly supported; poetry books do not sell; ballet and theatre companies struggle for<br />

subsidies to survive; the novel has been replaced by mindless, journalistic, lit. A main reviewer for <strong>The</strong><br />

Sunday Times publishes a book arguing that there are no criteria for art and that, therefore, the popular<br />

taste is decisive; a reviewer in <strong>The</strong> Irish Times, asked to choose her books of the year (2011) chooses 40<br />

titles. <strong>The</strong> recent closing ceremony for the London Olympics, which might have been a showcase for the<br />

great heritage of English culture, turned into one more Pop concert - resulting, as W.B. Yeats put it, in,<br />

<strong>The</strong> beating down of the wise<br />

And great art beaten down.<br />

But surely if, as I suggest, culture encapsulates the truth of things, and insight, and sanity’ and if ‘<strong>The</strong><br />

truth shall set you free’ then the statement by Portuguese critic Frias Martins 14 that,<br />

Contemporary culture has displaced Literature from its centre, preferring more immediate<br />

pleasures such as (pop) music, video clips, cinema, multimedia performances etc.<br />

then this ‘anti-literary apocalypse’ which we all see unfolding is expressive of a global neurosis, that<br />

‘sickness in being’ of which the philosopher Gabriel Marcel has spoken and written so persuasively. A<br />

world without cultural values tends to be one in which real culture is not valued: a neurotic world, one<br />

more in need than ever of the healing and wholeness which great art can offer.<br />

12 Sandblom, op.cit., p. 200.<br />

13 Pro Helvetia, Passages, 51, vol. 3, (Zurich, 2009).<br />

14 Martins, op. cit., p.238.<br />

200


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Session 3<br />

Parallel Session 1<br />

Perspectives, Approaches, and Practices<br />

• Parallel 1-1. Healing <strong>Humanities</strong>: Criticism and Defense<br />

• Parallel 1-2. Who Should Be Listened To?<br />

• Parallel 1-3. Healing Practices in the <strong>Humanities</strong>


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Parallel Session 1-1<br />

Healing <strong>Humanities</strong>: Criticism and Defense<br />

1. <strong>Humanities</strong> and Healing from Perspectives in and around<br />

Environmental Ethics<br />

/ Johan Hattingh (Stellenbosch University)<br />

2. Notes Toward a Typology of Consolation: Healing and Cultural<br />

Difference<br />

/ Yasunari Takada (<strong>The</strong> University of Tokyo)<br />

3. Feminism and the <strong>Humanities</strong> as Means for Healing: Focused<br />

on the Issue of Female North Korean Defectors<br />

/ Heisook Kim (Ewha Womans University)<br />

4. <strong>Humanities</strong> and the Crisis of Politics: from Kallipolis to Blade<br />

Runner’s L.A.<br />

/ Luca Maria Scarantino (IULM University)


<strong>Humanities</strong> and Healing from Perspectives in and around<br />

Environmental Ethics<br />

Johan Hattingh<br />

Stellenbosch University<br />

1. Introduction<br />

In the broad field of environmental philosophy and ethics, three different approaches, or groupings<br />

of perspectives, can be distinguished (Zimmerman 1993, vi-ix). <strong>The</strong> first could be identified as<br />

environmental ethics in the narrower sense of the word, characterised by the assumption that the solution<br />

to our environmental problems lies in moving away from our conventional human-centric ethical attitudes<br />

to grant moral considerability to non-human entities (Zimmerman 1993, vii). Holmes Rolston III, one of<br />

the founders of environmental ethics in this sense of the word in the 1970s delineated the central tasks of<br />

this approach to environmental ethics as follows:<br />

In practice the ultimate challenge of environmental ethics is the conservation of life on earth. In<br />

principle the ultimate challenge is a value theory profound enough to support that ethic. We need<br />

an account of how nature carries value, and an ethics that appropriately respects those values<br />

(Rolston 1991, 92).<br />

For the purposes of exploring the theme of the humanities and healing from perspectives in and around<br />

environmental ethics, I will discuss two examples of this approach to environmental ethics as it was<br />

articulated in the ethics of respect for nature of Paul Taylor, and in the land ethic of Aldo Leopold.<br />

A second approach to the broad field of environmental philosophy and ethics can be identified as radical<br />

ecophilosophy. Drawing on the countercultural movement in Western society, radical ecophilosophy<br />

includes deep ecology, ecofeminism, social ecology (Zimmerman 1993, vii), and to this could also be<br />

added the perspective of bioregionalism. As a radical approach to ecophilosophy, all of these perspectives<br />

endeavour to uncover the root causes of our environmental crisis as they can be found in fundamental<br />

205<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

conceptual frameworks, basic attitudes, social institutions and the organizational formations of society.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se perspectives also argue that our environmental crisis will not be resolved without a paradigm shift<br />

or revolution in society, entailing a profound transformation of the basic structure of society as well as<br />

the attitudes and philosophies underlying it. As such, these perspectives are sceptical of merely reforming<br />

certain aspects of society with a view to resolving our environmental crisis, for example by introducing<br />

tighter controls on industrial pollution or promoting recycling. <strong>The</strong>se represent only the symptoms of our<br />

environmental crisis; what we need rather is to address its root causes (Zimmerman 1993, vii). For the<br />

purposes of this paper, I will also focus on two examples of this approach, namely the deep ecology of<br />

Arne Naess, and the ecofeminism of Karen Warren.<br />

A third approach to the broad field of environmental philosophy and ethics, however, argues that it will<br />

not be possible to introduce a profound expansion of our moral horizon to make provision for the moral<br />

consideration of non-human entities, and that it would be naive to hope for a profound cultural revolution<br />

that will bring an end to our environmental troubles. Zimmerman (1993, viii-ix) refers to this approach as<br />

reformist anthropocentric ecophilosophy, because it basically assumes that the only realistic, and perhaps<br />

most powerful basis to argue for the protection of nature and ecosystems is the instrumental value they<br />

have for humans, ranging from direct use value to amenity values, aesthetic values, spiritual values and<br />

existence values. According to this approach, it is ignorance, greed and short-sightedness that lies at<br />

the root of our environmental crisis, and this can be addressed by education, smart policies, appropriate<br />

incentives, and legislation all geared to promote the wise and sustainable use of nature. For the purpose<br />

of this paper I will discuss one example of this broad approach that builds on its strengths, and in my<br />

view overcome many of the problems posed by this approach. This is represented by the environmental<br />

pragmatism of Bryan Norton that emphasizes the multiplicity of values that humans have to take into<br />

account when making environmental decisions, and when they try to resolve environmental issues.<br />

With this in mind, it appears as if one can establish a clear link between environmental philosophy and<br />

ethics on the one hand, and an explicitly formulated aim to the healing of the earth on the other hand, to<br />

the healing of our ecological systems through reforming our decisions and actions, expanding our moral<br />

horizon, or radically transforming our thinking, culture and society as they relate to the natural world and<br />

how we interact with it. <strong>The</strong> general aim of environmental ethics indeed can be described as an effort to<br />

move humankind away from an environmentally destructive and an ecologically unsustainable mode of<br />

existence to one that rather contributes to the flourishing of all life on earth in a manner that is sustainable<br />

over time.<br />

In my experience though, such a link between ethics and healing is not in the forefront of environmental<br />

philosophy and ethics, at least not as I have encountered it over two decades of reading and studying its<br />

206


main texts. <strong>The</strong> explicit link rather made is that between environmental philosophy and ethics on the one<br />

hand, and critical thinking – radical critique, for that matter – and in this critique to question, to question<br />

deeply, to confront, to oppose, to unsettle, to change, and to transform thinking and practice. <strong>The</strong> general<br />

argument in environmental ethics seems to push the notion of healing into the background, if the notion is<br />

entertained at all, and to rather focus on the problematic, destructive side of the thinking and practices that<br />

only takes into account aspects or parts of reality (for instance narrowly conceptualized human interests)<br />

and not the whole of life as it exists in its diversity and mutual ecosystemic inter-dependence.<br />

Against the background of these general observations I would like to focus in this paper in broad outline<br />

on the “target” of five important approaches to environmental philosophy and ethics – with a view to<br />

sketch something of the thinking and practices that they point out are environmentally destructive but<br />

in everyday life we tend to gloss over and effectively do very little about. My goal with regards to each<br />

perspective will be to show how they conceptualize the problem of environmental ethics, how they<br />

suggest we should analyse it, and how they propose we should position ourselves in relation to it, working<br />

towards overcoming it.<br />

In this overview I will also touch on what emerges positively from environmental ethics, formulated in<br />

general terms, as an alternative to the destructive mode of thinking informing the destructive practices<br />

leading to our environmental problems – and also discuss the conditions that are envisaged from the point<br />

of view of each perspective as prerequisites for these alternative thinking and practice to become visible,<br />

recognized, implemented and maintained.<br />

Being critical of laying a direct link between environmental philosophy and ethics and healing, I wish<br />

to preface this overview with a short exposition of the broad critical tradition of which the humanities,<br />

environmental philosophy and ethics alike form an important part. In this preface I will not only touch<br />

on some of the formal aspects of this critical tradition, but also point to some of the substantive ideas<br />

that emerged from this critical tradition, one of which is the insight that humans, in order to survive and<br />

flourish, need to acknowledge and respect their dependence on one another, in spite of any national,<br />

religious or cultural differences that may exist between them. Another insight is that humans, in order to<br />

survive and flourish, should acknowledge their fundamental dependence on natural ecosystems, and that<br />

human survival and flourishing are in fact dependent upon the survival and flourishing of non-human life<br />

on earth.<br />

2. Critical thinking and the humanities<br />

<strong>The</strong> central thesis informing this paper, is that western environmental philosophy and ethics forms<br />

207<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

part of a broad critical discourse also present in the humanities in which highly problematic aspects of<br />

typically western thinking and practices are identified, unmasked, questioned and challenged, and highly<br />

useful ideas about human existence, survival and flourishing have been articulated. One of the central<br />

characteristics of this critical discourse is the process of endless self-questioning (see Derrida 2007). While<br />

such a process of endless self-questioning at first glance appears to be a perpetually self-undermining<br />

enterprise, a second, informed look at it quickly shows that it is precisely this process of endless self-<br />

questioning that over centuries constituted the heart of this critical discourse, yielding not only substantive<br />

positive insights, but also actively resisting efforts to determine and fix prematurely our ideas of what<br />

health and a healthy society may entail. Below, a few instances of this process of endless questioning will<br />

be sketched, together with some of its results and what it protested against.<br />

One of the manifestations of critical thinking in the humanities as a process of endless self-questioning<br />

can be found in the so-called hermeneutic turn in subject fields like philosophy, history, and the social<br />

sciences. While the history of philosophy as well as the social sciences was for a very long time dominated<br />

by a positivist ideal of knowledge according to which only empirical facts yielded knowledge that can be<br />

taken seriously, the hermeneutical turn represented a shift towards a critical interpretation of all of those<br />

factors, including the so-called subjective side of life, ideologies and power games playing themselves<br />

out in society, that influence the understanding of facts. This shifted the central question of understanding<br />

away from “What is the case?” and “Why is it the case?” to critical questions such as: “How come that we<br />

accept this or that as the case, and what are the social effects and implications of this? Who wins or who<br />

loses from accepting this and not that as the case, and through which mechanisms do some in society win<br />

and others lose?”<br />

Clear examples of this kind of questioning can be found in the work of Marx, Nietzsche and Freud, who<br />

have all been characterized as “masters of suspicion” (Ricoeur 1970, 32), since none of them accepted<br />

any interpretation of social reality as a true depiction of it, but rather as an epiphenomenon that can be<br />

related to “deeper lying” factors. For Marx, for instance, the liberal consciousness of the bourgeoisie<br />

believing in the idea of universal progress through growth of the market economy was an expression of<br />

a false consciousness, neglecting to recognize how social reality was produced by an unfair distribution<br />

of economic power. For Marx this false consciousness at the same time legitimised the dominant class<br />

position of a certain sector of society, thus fulfilling an ideological role. Nietzsche, in turn, saw dominant<br />

social ideas as the manifestation of a will to power, while Freud maintained that human behaviour could<br />

be better explained and understood as a from a rationalisation of the libido than from reason or rationality.<br />

Building on the philosophy of Martin Heidegger, this critical hermeneutics was taken further, each in his<br />

own way, by Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida. Foucault focused on the mechanisms through which<br />

208


identity and self are formed in western society, and showed how the format of knowledge, systems of<br />

normativity and subtle disciplinary practices circulating in the institutions of society create certain forms of<br />

individuality that are actually imposed on humans and not chosen freely by themselves. In fact, Foucault<br />

puts serious question marks behind the notion of free, individual choice, and rather calls for processes of<br />

becoming conscious of the societal mechanisms forming ourselves, and how these mechanisms not only<br />

limit us to certain forms of being, and preventing us from taking up others, but also enable and empower<br />

us to form identities that we concretely realize. As such, this critical consciousness, to some extent, limits<br />

the hold of societal power on our existence, and opens up new or other possibilities of being that can be<br />

explored, subject to the proviso, however, that societal power also generates and forms our thinking about,<br />

and realization of these alternatives. Foucault thus does not see in critical thinking a total liberation from<br />

context and societal power; he rather steers us into the direction of accepting the fact that we will never be<br />

totally free from power, but rather that we, to some limited extent, can question, challenge and limit that<br />

power by endless self-questioning (see Foucault 1984 and 1990).<br />

Derrida points us in the same general direction with his focus on the language we speak and how we,<br />

through a process of deconstruction, can become aware of the many ways in which we endeavour to<br />

determine meaning finally, “containing” and “fixing” it as it were to become stable and controllable. For<br />

Derrida this process of determination entails the danger, and even the violence, of excluding other or<br />

alternative meanings, leading to processes and institutional arrangements that close down possibilities<br />

of growth and renewal, instead of opening them up in provocative and challenging ways. To resist this<br />

violence of determination and closure, Derrida suggests we uncover and become aware of the processes<br />

in language by which we construct meaning and truth claims that are portrayed to be more coherent<br />

and “rational” than they actually are. For Derrida, the primary tool to achieve this is by showing how<br />

language can have the opposite meaning to what it is claimed to mean. This process of inversion of<br />

meaning he refers to as deconstruction – which is central to the strategy that he also refers to as endless<br />

self-questioning. As such, he sees deconstruction not as a self-undermining, futile exercise, destroying<br />

language and meaning. He rather sees it as our only hope to deliver us from the danger of final, eternally<br />

determined meanings. Our only hope to learn to finally live, he stated in his last interview, is this process<br />

of endless questioning (Derrida 2007; see also Derrida 1981).<br />

A second manifestation of this tradition of radical questioning in western culture has culminated in a<br />

vision of humankind as single human race with the earth as the common homeland of that race (<strong>The</strong><br />

Universal House of Justice 2002; see also Laszlo 1994, and Morin and Kern 1999). In this vision, humans<br />

from different nations, cultures and religious backgrounds are not seen as fundamentally in competition<br />

with one another, but rather as mutually dependent upon one another for survival and flourishing,<br />

dependent as they all also are on the earth and the different natural systems characterising it for their<br />

209<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

survival and flourishing. This notion of unity and interdependence clearly goes against the grain of the<br />

current organisation of international relations characterised as it is by tension, competition, violence, war<br />

and self-interested decision-making and action. This notion also goes against the grain of a conventional,<br />

western notion of the subject as an abstract entity standing loose and apart from any context, and able to<br />

realise itself in pure isolation from everything else.<br />

Both this organisation of the international order, and this notion of self are rejected from the point of<br />

view of unity and interconnectedness – the first in favour of an international order organised around<br />

principles of universal respect for human rights, fairness, social justice, participation and democracy,<br />

and the second in favour of notions of a relational self, embedded in a concrete context characterised by<br />

time and place, permeated by social institutions and ecological systems that evolve over time and have<br />

their own interrelated histories, affecting one another in many particular ways. In the perspectives from<br />

environmental philosophy and ethics that will be discussed below, these themes will be picked up again.<br />

A third manifestation of the tradition of radical critical thinking in western culture can be found in the<br />

liberal arts approach to tertiary education as it is most commonly practiced in the USA, drawing as<br />

it does on the philosophy of education of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, John Dewey, Nobel Prize winner<br />

Rabinadranath Tagore of India, Friedrich Fröbel of Germany, Johann Pestalozzi of Switzerland, Bronson<br />

Alcott of the USA and Maria Montessori of Italy (Nussbaum 2011, 18, 19, 35). Criticizing the sharp<br />

division that is conventionally made between the natural and the human sciences, as well as efforts to<br />

eliminate beauty, creativity, imagination, self-exploratory questioning and critical dialogue with peers<br />

from “serious” education in favour of measurable outcomes that will guarantee financial success in<br />

the world, the liberal arts approach to education emphasises that all students require these humanities-<br />

oriented components in their education in order to help form democratic world citizens that can approach<br />

problems and problem solving from a broad, inclusive, global point of view, instead of the narrow partisan<br />

perspectives often emanating from sectional, regional, national or cultural interests. As such, this approach<br />

to education openly makes a choice to foster and promote those characteristics and dispositions in<br />

students that can make a positive contribution to the building of democratic institutions, characterised by<br />

participation, respect for differences, dialogue, imaginative problem solving and partnerships (Nussbaum<br />

2011) – strengthening the emerging vision of humanity as one race with the earth as common homeland.<br />

Taken together, these three manifestations of the western tradition of critical discourse articulate a strong<br />

vision of humankind dependent upon one another and the ecosystems of the earth for its survival and<br />

flourishing. Common to all three of these manifestations, is the strategy of endless questioning, that<br />

suggests that any and every vision of humankind, and any and every form of interaction cannot be<br />

accepted on face value, but should rather be questioned deeply and endlessly to determine its origins,<br />

210


structure, mechanisms of functioning, and its effects – on fellow human beings, as well as the earth and<br />

its ecosystems. In the section that follows I would like to give an overview and interpretation of five<br />

perspectives from environmental ethics that all, in their own manner, contribute to, and form part of this<br />

critical discourse – a discourse that never ceases to question and challenge. <strong>The</strong>se perspectives will only<br />

be sketched in broad outline, focusing on the respective “targets” that are distinguished in each case,<br />

as well as the questions why these “targets” are identified, how they are questioned, and what kind of<br />

responses are envisaged with each perspective to overcome the problems posed by a particular “target.”<br />

3. Five perspectives from within and around environmental ethics<br />

3.1 <strong>The</strong> ethics of respect for nature of Paul Taylor<br />

<strong>The</strong> “target” of Paul Taylor’s ethics of respect for nature is, in short, human arrogance (Taylor 1986).<br />

For Taylor, this arrogance entails the view that humans are superior to all other living entities, with the<br />

practical implication that only the interests of humans are worthy of moral consideration. Taylor begs to<br />

differ strongly from this view on three grounds: firstly, he sees humans as members of the community of<br />

life that has evolved on earth; secondly, from an evolutionary point of view humans are fairly late arrivals<br />

in this community of life; and thirdly, because it is simply wrong to assume that non-human living entities<br />

have no interests that are worthy of moral consideration.<br />

According to Taylor, all non-human living things should be viewed as teleological centres of life. This<br />

means that every non-human living thing has in interest to realise its own good in its own way. An<br />

elephant, for instance, has an interest to flourish as an elephant in the way elephants flourish, and so does<br />

a tree and a fern to flourish as their respective kinds in their own way. This further means that non-human<br />

living things have interests that are independent from any human use value that can be derived from them.<br />

For Taylor, this implies that non-human living entities have intrinsic value – value of their own that they<br />

pursue in their own unique way, and as such, this intrinsic value deserves moral respect and consideration.<br />

An ethics of respect for nature has three elements to it, Taylor argues; <strong>The</strong> first element entails acquiring<br />

objective knowledge about the general conditions under which non-human living entities thrive in<br />

nature, and to progressively deepen and expand this knowledge through science. In many respects this<br />

is knowledge that humans to a large extent do not have, and thus it should be actively pursued. <strong>The</strong><br />

second element is to recognize the individuality of non-human living organisms, which is to grasp their<br />

particularity. This entails a process of getting to know non-human living things in their uniqueness, how<br />

they differ from one another, and what their individual needs are. <strong>The</strong> third element entails a heightened<br />

consciousness characterised by a full awareness of that individual’s standpoint, i.e. its interests, and<br />

211<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

then to ensure that the conditions under which these interests can be realised, are maintained and even<br />

improved upon. In practical terms, this entails the conservation of habitats, as well as their improvement –<br />

or restoration where they are damaged and the damage can be reversed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> further aspect of Taylor’s ethic of respect for nature entails doing justice to non-human living entities<br />

in cases where the satisfaction of legitimate human needs compatible with an ethics of respect for nature<br />

has inevitable impacts on non-human living organisms. For this purpose, Taylor has formulated certain<br />

priority principles that should be followed, boiling down to avoid interference with the lives of non-human<br />

living organisms as far as possible, and when interference cannot be avoided, to reduce that effect of it to<br />

as little as possible in terms of numbers and intensity, and to compensate for that impact. <strong>The</strong> latter could<br />

for instance be done by recreating a habitat elsewhere if it is destroyed in a certain place, or relocating<br />

individual non-human organisms to other places if they or their habitat stand to be destroyed for the sake<br />

of, for instance, building a library or a harbour essential to satisfying human needs.<br />

With an ethics like this, Taylor thus argues for biocentric egalitarianism. All life in all of its forms needs<br />

to be respected, since every living organism has interests and independent value that cannot be ignored<br />

from a moral point of view. In this, humans have no position that, from a moral point of view, makes them<br />

superior to any other form of life. Humans should rather behave as members of the community of life,<br />

and vice versa, any non-human living organism should be treated and respected equally as member of<br />

the community of life. <strong>The</strong>re are no grounds for any exceptions, although Taylor makes provision for the<br />

principle of self defence in cases where non-human organisms are dangerous to humans, and humans do<br />

not venture wilfully into their territory to provoke them, and use minimum violence in such self-defence.<br />

3.2 <strong>The</strong> land ethic of Aldo Leopold<br />

<strong>The</strong> “target” of Aldo Leopold’s land ethic is the destructive power of mechanised man (Leopold 1949).<br />

While not a professional philosopher, and in fact preceding the emergence of theoretical environmental<br />

philosophy and ethics in the 1970s, Leopold articulated from the point of view of a practical<br />

environmental manager in the first half of the 20th century what happens when the interaction of humans<br />

with the land is mediated by technology, framed within a utilitarian calculus of costs and benefits: land<br />

becomes a commodity, and humans the conquerors of the land. For Leopold, this represents a crude<br />

reduction of both land and humans to something far less than they actually are, or can be. For him, land<br />

represents the community of life, and everything else that supports that life, and he argues that humans<br />

must become ordinary citizens of that community in a manner that their voices and votes do not count<br />

more than that of any other citizen. Such an ethic, however, Leopold points out, is not self-evident for<br />

the utilitarian oriented mechanised man. It is something that he will have to develop and learn, and as he<br />

212


suggests in what is arguably one of his most famous essays (Thinking like a mountain), such learning<br />

often takes place when it is too late, and irreversible damage to an ecosystem, or damage that is very hard<br />

to reverse, has already been caused.<br />

In this essay, Leopold relates how he as a young field ranger in the Rocky Mountains participated in a<br />

wolf-eradication programme, assuming that it would be possible to replace wolves with hunters in order<br />

to keep the deer population under control, and through that, by removing wolves from the mountain<br />

range, enabling stock farmers a guaranteed income and preventing them from going bankrupt. However,<br />

when Leopold noticed how the deer population exploded after the last wolf and mountain lion was<br />

destroyed, because the hunters that were supposed to take their places proved to be inefficient, and the<br />

deer population destroyed the mountain range, and then died from lack of adequate grazing, he concluded<br />

that only a mountain has lived long enough to listen objectively to the howl of a wolf. With this powerful<br />

metaphor he pointed out that the vision required to respect the community of life as a whole and every<br />

member within it, required much more than the short-term perspective of financial security dominated<br />

by cost-benefit analyses and the atomistic-mechanistic assumption that nature consists of discrete non-<br />

living “parts” that can be replaced at will by other parts with no real effect on the functioning of the<br />

whole. Instead, Leopold argues that nature should be seen as a living whole, a community of life, whose<br />

functioning is both complex and fragile, and of which we do not have complete knowledge. We therefore<br />

have to be very careful about our economic decisions, and always assess them for the impact they may<br />

have on larger spatial and temporal units. Ultimately, he argues, we should also consider geological<br />

time, the vision of a mountain, determining whether our decisions and actions will cause irreversible and<br />

permanent damage to the political, social, cultural, and ecological systems in which they are embedded.<br />

With this focus on the impact of decisions on the wider contexts within which they are embedded,<br />

Leopold (1949, 262) then formulated the central tenet of his land ethic in the following injunction: “A<br />

thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability and beauty of the biotic community. It is<br />

wrong when it tends otherwise.”<br />

With this perspective, Leopold expands our moral horizon to include not only non-human living entities<br />

as that which should be morally considered, but also the land, the waters, the ecosystems and inorganic<br />

natural processes that make the existence of the community of life possible in the first place. But he goes<br />

further, and also argues for a transformation of our conventional human ethics that only takes human<br />

interests seriously. In his land ethics he calls for a reorganization of our moral thinking to focus on<br />

context, interdependence and interconnectivity, history, evolution and geological time. In this manner<br />

he articulated already before the actual emergence of environmental philosophy and ethics a theoretical<br />

academic field insight that has proven to be central in the transformative thinking of both the humanities<br />

and the environmental thinking of today.<br />

213<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

3.3 <strong>The</strong> Deep ecology of Arne Naess<br />

<strong>The</strong> theme of a radical critique of the metaphysics and self-conception underlying consumer society<br />

is taken up in the deep ecology of Arne Naess (1982 and 1986). For him the “target” of environmental<br />

philosophy is the narrow, egotistical notion of self informing the consumerist life-style that has come<br />

to dominate the world. For Naess this self is immature in that it strives for realization through the<br />

accumulation and consumption of material goods and a high standard of living, and its only ecological<br />

worry is a shallow concern about pollution and habitat destruction that may jeopardise the consumerist<br />

project. Instead, Naess proposes a deep ecology that focuses on the root causes of our environmental<br />

predicaments. As Naess sees it, this root cause is the metaphysical notion of humans as separate and apart<br />

from nature, standing over and against it. Criticizing the image of “man in nature”, he rather develops the<br />

notion of mankind as part and parcel of nature – drawing among others on Gestalt theory, phenomenology<br />

and the philosophy of Mahatma Ghandi as sources of inspiration.<br />

Under these assumptions, Naess argues, a mature self, a big spirited self can emerge by using the mental<br />

strategy of identification with ever larger circles of being in which we as humans are embedded. In a<br />

though experiment to determine where the self is located, Naess points out that the self is not found<br />

somewhere within the mind or even the body of an individual; what we refer to as the self is rather<br />

formed by all of the relationships within which we are embedded that contribute to the formation of our<br />

consciousness and identity: the family, the clan, the village or town or city we live in, our immediate<br />

surroundings, the landscape, the continent we come from. All of this is part of ourselves, and we are<br />

connected to and part of it. Accordingly, Naess would not see environmental action as something that<br />

humans do for and on behalf of the environment. Protest against a dam that will be built in a valley, for<br />

instance, will rather be an act of self-defence.<br />

Arne Naess thus also emphasises ideas of interdependence and interconnectivity, and calls very strongly<br />

for a transformation of our deepest assumptions about nature, self, identity, consciousness, and self-<br />

realization with a view to overcoming our environmental crisis. He is criticized, however, for not taking<br />

ideology, domination and power relations explicitly into account in his deep ecology, which is clearly<br />

done in ecofeminist circles, in particular in the ecofeminism of Karen Warren, to which we turn next.<br />

3.4 <strong>The</strong> ecofeminism of Karen Warren<br />

In her famous essay “<strong>The</strong> power and the promise of ecological feminism” Karen Warren (1990) argues<br />

that patriarchy should be singled out as the root cause of our environmental problems – since it is<br />

214


characterized by a logic of domination and exploitation that not only informs the interaction of men with<br />

women, but also that of humans with nature. This logic of domination, she points out, is characterized by<br />

three elements: dichotomous thinking in which a number of simplistic binary oppositions are clustered and<br />

combined to reinforce one another; hierarchical thinking in which the one pole of the binary opposition<br />

is given a positive value, while the other one is given a negative value; and an argument in which those<br />

associated with the positive values are portrayed as superior and justified in dominating those associated<br />

with the negative values and are portrayed and treated as inferior.<br />

As Warren correctly shows, the human-nature dichotomy and the male-female dichotomy are still<br />

functioning in an analogous and mutually reinforcing manner in many sectors of mainstream popular<br />

culture, and are supported by a wide array of similar dichotomies, each of which are given a place within<br />

a value hierarchy that allocates positive value to the male or human side of the dichotomies, and negative<br />

value to the female or nature side of the dichotomy. Combined with the argument that the superior side of<br />

a value hierarchy can legitimately dominate and exploit the inferior side, the social effects of this dualistic<br />

and hierarchical thinking is the portrayal of the domination of both women and nature as part of the<br />

normal order of things, and something that does not deserve any questioning or critical discussion.<br />

With this observation, Warren draws attention to the ideological functioning of the logic of domination<br />

in society: it privileges patriarchal power to dictate agendas of action, and silences through various<br />

mechanisms any protest and opposition that could be raised to that agenda. One of the mechanisms<br />

often used in this “silencing, is the portrayal of any protest as unreasonable or not normal. In particular,<br />

Warren argues, the voices of those women who are dominated and exploited by this logic are silenced,<br />

they are rendered speechless, so that even if they tried to speak out, their voices in protest and opposition<br />

are not heard. Accordingly, Warren formulates the agenda of ecofeminism as unmasking, opposing and<br />

overcoming this logic of domination and its silencing effects in any and every one of its manifestations in<br />

society.<br />

Central to this agenda for Warren is the strategy of giving voice to those who have been silenced by the<br />

logic of domination, something that could be achieved by foregrounding the experience of women who<br />

have become victims of patriarchy in their own lives, but also have become victims of the domination<br />

and exploitation of nature. As she argues forcefully in her article, dominated and oppressed women have<br />

many stories to tell and to share with the world, and the best way to capture these stories is by listening<br />

to the first person singular narratives of those who have become the victims of the logic of domination<br />

of patriarchy. In these “I”-narratives, Warren argue, experiences will be and are articulated that are not<br />

commonly found in theoretical writings. Instead, these narratives will be concrete and specific, articulating<br />

what was lived through in the context from which the narrative speaks, placing living and real issues in a<br />

215<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

vivid and direct manner on the agendas of those concerned about environmental and feminist issues, and<br />

as such serve as inspiration for activist responses.<br />

Ultimately, Warren argues that this ecofeminist agenda and its strategies to give voice to the experiences of<br />

the victims of patriarchy will enable society to discard the logic of domination, its central argument and its<br />

dualist and hierarchical thinking. This could be done, she argues, in mode of thinking that does not discard<br />

the differences between men and women, or humankind and nature, but acknowledge these differences<br />

albeit in a manner that does not have the end result of domination and exploitation. What Warren argues<br />

for in the place of dichotomies and hierarchies is thus relational thinking in which differences are seen<br />

as nuances on a spectrum, the end points of which are not regarded as dichotomous poles but rather<br />

possibilities in a continuum.<br />

With these perspectives Warren articulates a radically transformative agenda for ecofeminism – in which<br />

not only the identities of male and female, or humankind and nature are rethought, but also the relationship<br />

between them, that is: their mode of interaction. Together with Val Plumwood, Karen Warren thus makes<br />

a positive contribution to the articulation of selves and identities in terms of their interdependence and<br />

internal connections. Her critical thinking points us in the direction of rethinking differences in a manner<br />

that does not see differences as a source of domination and exploitation, but as a source of building new<br />

connections and enriched selves and identities.<br />

From the practical world of environmental governance and management, however, the criticism is often<br />

heard that the radical, transformative perspectives likes those of deep ecology and ecofeminism discussed<br />

above, while making many legitimate points, have long-term agendas that will take too long for the<br />

positive results of societal or cultural transformations to really come into effect, and that environmental<br />

decision-makers who have to address environmental issues today require guidance that can be used<br />

immediately, and articulated in a practical language that can be understood by politicians and managers<br />

alike. A bold effort in the articulation of such a pragmatic approach can be found in the environmental<br />

ethics of Bryan Norton.<br />

3.5 <strong>The</strong> environmental pragmatism of Bryan Norton<br />

In his environmental pragmatism Bryan Norton (1991, 2003, 2005) responds to the embarrassment of<br />

environmentalists and managers alike that they have no common, practical language in which to articulate<br />

our environmental problems and the paths to follow towards resolving them. He argues that we have<br />

to move beyond theoretical, metaphysical and ideological language in this endeavour, and also beyond<br />

language that only makes use of single principles or value perspectives to articulate issues and solutions.<br />

216


We rather need to accommodate a multiplicity of values in combination with one another, taking into<br />

account different kinds of environmental risks that we are exposed to, as well as the realities of the costs<br />

to address them.<br />

To develop such a language, Norton makes use of an approach in which learning from experience, the<br />

actual experiences and struggles of communities confronted with particular environmental challenges,<br />

and multiple scales of analysis stands central. Norton refers to this generally as the bases of adaptive<br />

management, in which the question of how communities actually value and make sense of things,<br />

environmental challenges and possible solutions included, should strategically speaking, be the point of<br />

departure.<br />

As Norton sees it, adaptive management is essentially an iterative, participative and democratic enterprise<br />

in which management targets, outcomes, plans and strategies are not defined unilaterally and finally<br />

by managers from a distant and technocratic point of view, but provisionally and in dialogue with the<br />

communities in which environmental problems have to be addressed. In such a process, Norton argues,<br />

it is important to identify clear indicators on which the communities involved agree in terms of which<br />

management success or failure can be measured, and if mileposts are not reached or overshot, adjustments<br />

can be made in time, before it is too late, to adjust targets, outcomes, plans, or strategies.<br />

A short illustration of what Norton has in mind with this pragmatic approach and practical language can<br />

be given with reference to a simple decision square (see Figure 1 below) that he has designed to guide<br />

thinking about different kinds of environmental risks and how to respond to them. <strong>The</strong> point of departure<br />

of this decision square is a risk typology that ranges from mere inconveniences to irreversible catastrophes.<br />

[Figure 1] Bryan Norton’s decision square depicting a risk typology, linked to severity and reversibility (Norton 2003, 172).<br />

217<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

On this continuum, increments in risk severity can be indicated as varying degrees of real resource costs,<br />

severe economic dislocation, cultural or political impoverishment, biological impoverishment, and<br />

distinction (Norton 2003, 172). On this square, reversibility and irreversibility could be entered on the<br />

bottom line, with the most reversible inconveniences placed in the bottom right hand corner, and the most<br />

irreversible catastrophes like species extinction in the left hand corner. On the vertical axis low cost can be<br />

entered at the bottom, and high cost at the top. In combination with one another, all of the factors in this<br />

decision square could be portrayed as follows:<br />

With such a guide, one can plot in broad outline environmental risks and responses to it, and from its<br />

location on the square inferences can be made about the kinds of values that need to be considered in order<br />

to better characterize the risk and to think more clearly about possible responses. Small inconveniences<br />

that can be reversed at low cost will clearly require mostly short-term financial or economic values to<br />

decide about, while the location of a repository for nuclear waste storage that can have long term socio-<br />

political implications for a region or even cause biological impoverishment, and will be very expensive<br />

not only to locate but also to shift if it were to be initially located in the wrong place, will require processes<br />

of careful and sensitive political dialogue, community participation and long term thinking, over and<br />

above financial cost-benefit analyses to decide.<br />

By introducing the category in the decision square of irreversible catastrophe that will incur very high,<br />

if not incalculable costs to deal with, Norton is able to articulate the notion of non-negotiable thresholds<br />

that need to be defined by society, managers and experts in dialogue with one another. Thresholds like this<br />

will represent hard limits beyond which society has decided it should not go, and also stimulate policies<br />

designed to discourage decision-makers to approach these limits, creating safety margins that should be<br />

respected. When these non-negotiable thresholds are approached, Norton argues that cost-benefit calculus<br />

and purely utilitarian considerations are trumped by societal interests in safety, security, and stability, and/<br />

or considerations preventing biological impoverishment or extinctions. This is another way for Norton of<br />

saying that we should spare no costs in ensuring that we do not approach these non-negotiable thresholds,<br />

and that in certain contexts when confronted with certain risks those risks cannot be traded off against<br />

possible economic gains that can be gained from it.<br />

While representing thus a reformist anthropocentric position in environmental ethics, Norton’s pragmatic<br />

approach need not be seen as a weak approach. On the contrary, it could function as radical as any of<br />

the other positions in environmental philosophy and ethics discussed above, and perhaps even have the<br />

advantage of speaking the language of managers, planners and politicians that can understand it from the<br />

outset.<br />

218


4. Interpretation and Conclusion<br />

With this broad overview of a selection of perspectives from within and around environmental ethics it is<br />

possible to draw three strong conclusions about the theme of the humanities and healing:<br />

1. From the overview it is evident that environmental philosophy and ethics in its theoretical, practical,<br />

reformative, transformative and radical formats are primarily concerned with critical thinking that<br />

questions and poses challenges to conventional ways of thinking and conventional practices that lead<br />

to environmental risks and destruction. While these different perspectives in environmental ethics all in<br />

their own ways make a contribution to the transformation of our ethical thinking, to the expansion of<br />

the circle of what can and should be included in the realm of moral considerability, to taking seriously<br />

ecological and societal considerations that have been neglected before, to transforming practices and<br />

mental frameworks, to changing the structure and functioning of society, and to putting in place newly<br />

conceptualized practices, processes, institutions and modes of self-realization, little if any of these are<br />

linked directly by environmental philosophers and ethicists to the healing of society or nature in the<br />

conventional sense of the term healing. Instead, the link is rather made to a confrontation or engagement<br />

with society at large, prompting it to move away from an unsustainable and destructive development path<br />

to one that is sustainable and restorative in its main thrust.<br />

2. From the overview it is also evident that the different perspectives in environmental philosophy and<br />

ethics, sharing as they are in a broad critical aim, contribute in their own ways to a wider global discourse<br />

in which interdependence, democratic participation, and the unity of humankind as one race with the earth<br />

as common homeland are emphasized. In this discourse interdependence, democratic participation, the<br />

unity of humankind, and respect for the earth are emphasized as prerequisites or boundary conditions for<br />

the flourishing of human and non-human life on earth alike, together and in interaction with one another<br />

in a shared history, co-evolving in interaction with one another. As it is typical of the western tradition<br />

of critical thinking, these boundary conditions are not seen as substantive definitions or determinations<br />

of what this flourishing should entail, or what direction this history of co-evolution should take. It is<br />

rather a future oriented mode of thinking that is in principle always open for change and transformation,<br />

and as such calls for a continual process of exploration of possible ways of identity formation and<br />

self-realization, as well as a never-ending process of self-questioning in which any constraints to the<br />

flourishing of life and its openness to the future are identified and challenged. As it has been shown above,<br />

environmental ethics in its many different formats make an important and substantive contribution to this<br />

process of endless exploration and self-questioning. <strong>The</strong> enthusiasm and vigour with which environmental<br />

philosophy and ethics have taken up this role in the past four decades is a clear indication that its critical<br />

thinking and questioning is seen as part of a healthy process, without prescribing or pre-empting in any<br />

219<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

way what exactly should be regarded as the final standard in terms of which the health of society should<br />

be determined.<br />

3. In the overview above it has been demonstrated that western environmental philosophy and ethics<br />

challenges the ideal and practice of unrestrained physical growth and development that is still to a very<br />

large extent prevalent in industrial societies, arguing that this ideal and practice is unsustainable in the<br />

sense of destroying not only the physical, or ecological basis of life on earth, but also the spiritual basis<br />

of human existence, i.e. the sense of wonder and respect for life on earth as an unfolding and evolving<br />

process with a worth of its own independent from the interests of human beings. In the overview above,<br />

it was also demonstrated that the unsustainable and destructive development path of industrial society is<br />

in part the result of the reduction of decision-making criteria about development to short-term economic<br />

considerations, and in part the result of the reduction of the notion of self-realization to that of acquiring<br />

material wealth and consumption of material goods. As such a critical enterprise, environmental ethics can<br />

easily be framed as a “healing” endeavour – its central aim and focus can easily be depicted as an effort<br />

to heal humankind from the illnesses of materialism, consumerism, autism, fragmentation, isolationism<br />

and abstract idealism. <strong>The</strong> irony, however, is that such a focus on healing will typically become part of<br />

the critical questioning of environmental philosophy and ethics itself, unravelling as it will do what the<br />

notion of health may entail in this context, questioning how the meaning of “health” was constructed and<br />

determined, how this meaning circulates and functions in society, who wins what by this through which<br />

mechanisms and who loses what ... So, as it was argued in the main thrust of this paper, instead of linking<br />

environmental philosophy and ethics with the notion of healing, environmental philosophy and ethics<br />

rather seem to suggest that it is healthier to question the notion of health and to keep on subjecting it to a<br />

process of endless questioning, rather than to try to finally determine what exactly “health” means and to<br />

try to implement that meaning in the world. Indeed, many efforts in the recent past to restore society to<br />

a state of health have ended in catastrophe, many dimensions of which have been irreversible and have<br />

come with incalculable costs. At least, this has been the experience in western culture.<br />

References<br />

Derrida, J. (2007) Learning to Live Finally: <strong>The</strong> Last Interview. Brooklyn: Melville House Publishing.<br />

Derrida, J. (1981) Positions. Translated by Alan Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.<br />

Foucault, M. (1984) <strong>The</strong> Foucault Reader. Pantheon Books.<br />

Foucault, M. (1990) Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings, 1977-1984. New York:<br />

Routledge.<br />

Laszlo, E. (1993) <strong>The</strong> Multicultural Planet: <strong>The</strong> Report of a UNESCO International Expert Group.<br />

Oneworld Publications.<br />

220


Leopold, A. (1949) A Sand County Almanac: And Sketches Here and <strong>The</strong>re. Oxford University Press.<br />

Morin, E. and Kern, A.B. (1999) Homeland Earth: A Manifesto for the New Millennium (Advances in<br />

Systems <strong>The</strong>ory, Complexity and the Human Sciences).<br />

Naess, A. (1982) Simple in Means, Rich in Ends. An interview with Arne Naess by Stephan Bodian. <strong>The</strong><br />

Ten Directions. Los Angeles: Los Angeles Zen Centre.<br />

Naess, A. (1986) <strong>The</strong> Deep Ecological Movement: Some Philosophical Aspects. Philosophical Inquiry,<br />

Vol. VIII, No. 1-2, pp. 10-31.<br />

Norton, B.G. (2003) Searching for Sustainability: An Interdisciplinary Philosophy of Conservation<br />

Biology. Cambridge University Press.<br />

Norton, B.G. (2005) Sustainability: A Philosophy of Adaptive Ecosystem Management. University of<br />

Chicago Press.<br />

Norton, B.G. (1991) Toward Unity Among Environmentalists. Oxford University Press.<br />

Nussbaum, M. (2011) Niet Voor De Winst. Waarom De Democratie De Geesteswetenschappen Nodig<br />

Heeft. (A Dutch translation by Rogier van Kappel of Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the<br />

<strong>Humanities</strong>, Princeton University Press, 2010.) Amsterdam: Ambo/Anthos Uitgevers.<br />

Ricoeur, P. (1970) Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press.<br />

Rolston III, H. (1991) “Environmental ethics: Values in and duties to the natural world”. In F. Herbert<br />

Bornmann and Stephen R. Kellert (eds.), <strong>The</strong> Broken Circle: Ecology, Economics, Ethics, New<br />

Haven: Yale University Press.<br />

Taylor, P. (1986) Respect for Nature: A <strong>The</strong>ory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton University Press.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Universal House of Justice (2002) Message to the <strong>World</strong>’s Religious Leaders. Available at http://<br />

www.bahai.org/selected-writings/message-worlds-religious-leaders/<br />

Warren, K.J. (1990) “<strong>The</strong> power and the promise of ecological feminism”. Environmental Ethics, Vol. 12,<br />

No. 2, pp. 125-146.<br />

Zimmerman, M.E. (1993) General introduction. In Zimmerman, M.E. (general editor), Environmental<br />

Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.<br />

221<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Notes Toward a Typology of Consolation: Healing and Cultural<br />

Difference<br />

Yasunari Takada<br />

<strong>The</strong> University of Tokyo<br />

1. 3.11 and Healing<br />

Japan still remains in the aftermath of the 3.11, the disaster that happened in 2011, now officially named<br />

“the Great Earthquake Disaster in the Eastern Japan.” <strong>The</strong> disaster, as you know, was twofold: one<br />

is the natural disaster of earthquake and tsunami and the other the man-made disaster of radioactive<br />

contamination that happened at Fukushima no. 1 nuclear power plant. In both kinds of disaster, natural<br />

and/or man-made, those who suffered from them have clearly been in need of healing. When I was told<br />

the topic of the present conference it was natural that I was immediately reminded of the 3.11 disasters.<br />

It goes without saying that for the victims of the disasters, both natural and man-made, urgent was the<br />

healing, ranging from surgical treatment to psychiatric counseling. And after one year and a half it still<br />

remains the case. But my concern here is not with these aspects of healing: it is proper that they be dealt<br />

with in various departments of medical science. Instead, what I am concerned with here is the relationship<br />

between healing and culture because cultural difference matters much, as I understand it, in defining<br />

the characteristic and practice of healing. <strong>The</strong> idea may sound trite and it even belongs to a common<br />

knowledge, but it seems to me not worthless to examine this problematic of healing and culture as it<br />

presents itself in and around the 3.11 disaster.<br />

2. Two Impressive Features of 3.11 and Two Kinds of Healing<br />

When one talks about the 3.11 disaster, there are two impressive features that cannot be left unmentioned.<br />

One is the disciplined behavior of the people who suffered from the earthquake and tsunami, and the other<br />

is the confused state of affairs among those who were supposed be in charge of the nuclear power safety<br />

control.<br />

222


It is said that nothing was more impressive than the self-discipline and peace of mind with which those<br />

who had undergone the horrendous earthquake conducted themselves. Foreign media reporting the<br />

disaster and its aftermath seems to have been particularly struck with the general composure the people<br />

showed in face of such a crisis. A few explanations are proposed for this admirable phenomenon. Some<br />

say that part of the reason can be sought in the fact that the Eastern Japan is sparsely populated and there<br />

is no big city in the areas badly hit by the earthquake and tsunami. 1 Others say that it is because of the<br />

backwardness and the severe weather of the Eastern district, due to which its people are used to patience<br />

and endurance. Each of the explanations may have a grain of truth in it but are not particularly convincing.<br />

A more general theory, as it happened, was proposed more than eighty years ago by a noted physicist,<br />

Torahiko Terada (1878-1935). According to him, nature in Japan has two faces, one being that of<br />

beautiful loving mother and the other that of terrifying strict father. If the former can find its exemplary<br />

representation in the beautiful landscape filled with a large variety of hilly features, the latter sees its<br />

expression in the frequent and violent earthquake. Both of them, however, have their ultimate origins in<br />

the volcanic activities.<br />

In Japan the mercifulness of Nature (the loving mother) is so profound and profuse that its<br />

inhabitants can easily feel themselves saturated with it, finding themselves comfortably nestling in<br />

her arms, while at the same time the severe punishments of Nature (the strict father) cut them to the<br />

bone to such an extent that its inhabitants think it useless to revolt against him. As a consequence,<br />

while sufficiently enjoying the blessings of nature, they have given up their will to revolt against<br />

nature and tried instead to accumulate the experience and knowledge about nature so as to<br />

accustom themselves to it. 2<br />

In Terada’s view, nature in Japan has in it both benign and malign sides. But they both have acted in<br />

a kind of collusion to produce the kind of mentality (human nature) that tends to feel at once comfort<br />

andresignation toward nature. Following Terada’s theory, it is not impossible to say that we witnessed a<br />

manifestation of this inherited second nature behind the self-discipline and composure of the victims of<br />

the 3.11 earthquake and tsunami. 3<br />

1 In the Great Kanto Earthquake that hit Tokyo in 1923, indeed, there was triggered off a massacre, in which a number of<br />

Koreans became the victims of groundless rumors. But basically, this was a politically motivated happening.<br />

2 Torahiko Terada, “<strong>The</strong> Japanese View on Nature” (1935), in Natural Disaster and the Japanese, ed. Tetsuo Yamaori (Tokyo:<br />

Kadokawa, 2011), pp. 123-24.<br />

3 Related to this feature of composure the victims of the natural disaster showed in the face of crisis is the nation-wide<br />

movement of compassion called “kizuna”, or ties or bonds both between the people and with the native land. Again,<br />

Terada sought a kind of its origin in the complicated and labyrinthine structure of natural topography, which has been<br />

223<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

<strong>The</strong> second impressive feature was observable not in the behavior of the victims of the natural disaster but<br />

in the conduct of those in power who were responsible for the control and management of nuclear power.<br />

Admittedly, how those concerned (the cabinet, TPCO and NISA (Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency))<br />

went about in risk management and what they did and did not has not yet been fully clarified and still<br />

awaits full investigation. But this much can be safely said: there was a panic, where proper control and<br />

management was hardly at work. That there seems to have been no command system ready to cope with<br />

the situation will reveal that no proper provision had been made against this kind of crisis. “Beyond all<br />

expectations” is the characteristic phrase those in the responsible position have kept repeating to describe<br />

the situation.<br />

We must be cautious about making judgments on the Fukushima incident until a full report will come out,<br />

but I think I am not alone in perceiving in the characteristic phrase “beyond all expectations” what Terada<br />

had to say about the typical Japanese attitude to nature, particularly in its terrifying aspect of strict father.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> severe punishments of Nature (the strict father) [earthquake and tsunami],” he says, “cut them to the<br />

bone to such an extent that its inhabitants think it useless to revolt against him. As a consequence, […]<br />

they have given up their will to revolt against nature.” <strong>The</strong> invention of nuclear power is nothing if not<br />

an ultimate instance of the “revolt against nature.” It is therefore not permissible for those engaged in this<br />

“revolt against nature” to confess that they failed to take every measure of prevention against any possible<br />

occurrence of disaster nature has in store, of which earthquake and tsunami are unfortunate but familiar<br />

stocks in trade. <strong>The</strong> confession of “beyond all expectations” that those responsible for nuclear power<br />

unwittingly made is revealing in that they were unaware of being engaged in the daring business of the<br />

“revolt against nature.” <strong>The</strong> origins and causes of this serious unawareness are obviously too complicated<br />

to elucidate, but there seem to be two major underlying assumptions that helped to make the confession<br />

possible. Firstly, it is likely that they simply regarded the business of nuclear power not as the ultimate<br />

case of the Western scientific tradition but simply as one of the imported technologies. A technology is a<br />

technology because of its being transferrable from one cultural tradition to another without carrying with it<br />

its background world view. And behind the invention of nuclear power is a distinct tradition, what Terada<br />

calls the “analytic science” of the West, whose ultimate origins Terada suggests have closely to do with<br />

the Judeo-Christian world view. 4 Secondly, because of the traditional attitude toward nature that has been<br />

persistently fostered on the Japanese Isles they found it difficult to recognize the basic distinction between<br />

further strengthened by the characteristic volcanic activities. “Such topography is not conducive to a nomadic people but<br />

instrumental to settling a people in a place. Those who are settled in this way as natives came gradually to assume their<br />

own local characteristics while accustoming themselves to their local climates. And at the same time they came to form a<br />

strong attachment to their native lands where they were settled” (Ibid., pp. 111-12). <strong>The</strong> similar argument and theme was<br />

to be further substantiated by Tetsuro Watsuji in his Fudo (1935, Climate and Change in English translation).<br />

4 Ibid., p. 124.<br />

224


natural and man-made disasters. “Beyond all expectations” is a phrase that naturally comes out from those<br />

who “have given up their will to revolt against nature and tried instead to accumulate the experience and<br />

knowledge about nature so as to accustom themselves to it.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> point I’d like to make based on the distinction between natural and man-made disasters is that there<br />

is a corresponding difference in healing as well. At the risk of oversimplification the case can be made<br />

that the natural disaster calls for a course of affective adjustments while the man-made disaster demands<br />

a process of rational understanding. For the natural disaster is in its nature inexplicable and something<br />

ineluctable to comply with whereas the man-made disaster is susceptible rational analysis and something<br />

one can and must answer for.<br />

Discussion I’ve made above of the two impressive features about the 3.11 disaster indicates that the<br />

Japanese culture seems to be programmed to produce a peculiar mental disposition. Namely, it has a<br />

relatively high capacity to accommodate itself to natural disasters, while it shows, on the other hand,<br />

a rather limited capacity when it faces a man-made calamity. Now, this in turn suggests the possibility<br />

of cultural difference in the way the two kinds of healing take their effect. <strong>The</strong>re can be a culture, for<br />

example, where, in sharp contrast to the Japanese, the mental disposition is programmed to accommodate<br />

itself less to natural disasters than to man-made calamities. But first it is necessary to take a close look at<br />

the supposed peculiarity of the nature and structure of the Japanese culture.<br />

3. Nature and Structure of Japanese Culture<br />

What I picked up for the examination of Japanese culture are the three intellectuals representing the high<br />

culture of postwar Japan: Shuichi Kato (1919-2008), Masao Maruyama (1914-1996) and Toshihiko<br />

Izutsu (1914-1993). Shuichi Kato, perhaps best known to the English-speaking world as the author of A<br />

History of Japanese Literature, was veritably a versatile intellectual. Trained as medical doctor but taught<br />

himself in literature, philosophy and art of both East and West, he established himself as a cosmopolitan<br />

intellectual and remained long as a leading critic. He is also remembered as a life-long civic activist<br />

in defense of the Article 9 of the Constitution. 5 Masao Maruyama, professor of political philosophy at<br />

the University of Tokyo and in his time an influential scholar-critic, was perhaps also familiar to the<br />

English-speaking world through a couple of his representative works, Studies in the Intellectual History<br />

5 ARTICLE 9. Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justice and order, the Japanese people forever renounce<br />

war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling international disputes. (2) To<br />

accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be<br />

maintained. <strong>The</strong> right of belligerency of the state will not be recognized.<br />

225<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

of Tokugawa Japan and Thought and Behavior in Modern Japanese Politics. Although the former<br />

work received a due criticism of scholarly inaccuracy of over-reading or under-reading of Confucian<br />

scholar in the Edo period, it should be read in the same spirit in which the latter work was written, i.e.,<br />

the philosophical diagnosis of Japan’s ultra-nationalism in its pre- and interwar period and the search<br />

for its remedy. For Maruyama, and for Kato as well, the fiasco in which the Fifteen Years War (from the<br />

Manchurian Incident of 1931 to the total capitulation in 1945) had come to an end proved the failure of<br />

Japan’s modernization, especially in its spiritual aspects. <strong>The</strong>y were of the opinion that Japan was still<br />

in need of proper modernization in its spiritual sphere: modernization for them remained “an unfinished<br />

project.” Now, Toshihiko Izutsu, our third figure, is a slightly different kettle of fish. Well-versed in<br />

numerous languages, both classical and modern, he accomplished a comparative study on a variety of<br />

religious experiences in East and West to eventually become a world-noted Islamist. In 1962 he left Japan,<br />

where he had taught at Keio University for more than ten years to assume a professorial appointment<br />

at McGill University, Canada. And then in 1975 he was invited from the Imperial Iranian Academy<br />

of Philosophy at Teheran, where he stayed until 1979, when the outbreak of the Islamic revolution<br />

forced him to return to Japan. Among his numerous books in English are Ethico-Religious Concepts<br />

in the Qur’an, Sufism and Taoism, and Toward a Philosophy of Zen Buddhism. He preferred to be a<br />

cosmopolitan, wandering scholar, and as such belongs to the rare species among Japanese intellectuals,<br />

which includes Kato as well.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se are the three personages, through whose examination I would like to bring out the nature and<br />

structure of the Japanese culture. But what strikes us most at first glass is their diversity: a critic, a<br />

scholar of political philosophy, and a philosopher of Oriental religions, but there are in fact two reasons<br />

why I chose these three intellectuals among others: (1) precisely because they were different from those<br />

philosophers of “Kyoto school” who were intent on building either a national philosophy or an Oriental<br />

philosophy serving the national end. It is true that one of Toshihiko Izutsu’s works, Consciousness and<br />

Essence (1982), purports to build “a synchronic system of Oriental philosophy” but it has nothing to do<br />

with any form of parochial nationalism. As for Kato and Maruyama, it was exactly with the critique of the<br />

wartime nationalism that marked the point of departure for their lifelong activities. Secondly I chose them<br />

(2) because Kato’s last work, Space and Time in Japanese Culture (2007), as I understand it, will provide<br />

us with a broad scheme, through which both Maruyama’s and Izutsu’s works are to be interrelated.<br />

3-1. Kato<br />

People in Japanese society, at its all levels, have a tendency to live only for the present, letting<br />

bygones be bygones and leaving the future up to the wind. <strong>The</strong> meaning of the present events is<br />

defined not in their relation to the past history or future prospect but on its own, irrespective of<br />

226


what is gone and what it to come.<br />

<strong>The</strong> typical community, where days are spent in the characteristically present-oriented way, […]<br />

has such distinct boundaries that the behavior and attitude of its members toward its insiders is<br />

contrastively different from the one toward its outsiders. Behind such difference in their behavior<br />

and attitude is probably a strong communal sense of belonging together. Since such a community<br />

for them is a life-world, the strong sense of belonging together implies that their world is nothing<br />

but “here.” […] It seems to be the case, therefore, that in Japan people have found themselves<br />

living “here-now.” 6<br />

<strong>The</strong> upshot of Kato’s argument in his Space and Time in Japanese Culture is that the essentials of the<br />

Japanese culture can be found in its characteristic attitude toward and predilection for “here and now.” By<br />

this “here and now” he means that in the sharp distinction the Japanese culture will make between inside<br />

and outside, greater store is set of “the inside” (here) while in the perception of time, too, much is made of<br />

the momentary and ephemeral “now” rather than the long-term temporal perspective. Kato tries to prove<br />

this thesis in a comparative way, using the European conception of space and time as a kind of foil to<br />

reveal the Japanese distinction.<br />

While time in the Judeo-Christian tradition was conceived of as linear progression with its distinct<br />

beginning and end, time in the Japanese culture, as can be seen in the national foundation myth of the<br />

Kojiki (712), was considered linear but without its definite beginning and end. Genesis of the world in<br />

the Japanese tradition is characterized not by creatio ex nihilo but by “spontaneous emergence” without<br />

creator and without end. If in the Judeo-Christian tradition every event happening there happens once for<br />

all and its meaning is defined by its reference to the past and future events, in the Japanese culture the<br />

sense of such temporal coherence is feeble: it is often said and seriously that “let bygones drain in the<br />

water,” meaning “let bygones be bygones.” In the Judeo-Christian tradition time, being finite and one-<br />

directional, is susceptible of being structured and hence the history was conceived as a forward movement<br />

progressing toward its end, whereas in the Japanese culture time, taken essentially as an emergent<br />

moment, will not articulate itself into a structured history in its European sense of the word.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Greek conception of cyclical time without beginning and end (“anakuklesis” -- eternal return)<br />

indeed seems to offer a structure similar to the Japanese but with the difference that the Greek one was<br />

conceived on the model of the movement of the celestial spheres whereas the Japanese one does not look<br />

6 Space and Time in Japanese Culture (Iwanami-shoten, 2007), pp. 3-4.<br />

227<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

up for a transcendent model but remains in and with nature. Its predilection for the ephemeral “now” can,<br />

therefore, find its local cohabitation with the sense of the natural cycle of four seasons.<br />

By the same token, Kato conducts a comparative diagnosis with regard to the conception of space<br />

peculiar to the Japanese culture. While the ancient Greek world was characterized by the diversity in<br />

and mobility among its peoples with different cultural and religious backgrounds, the Japanese culture,<br />

due to its geopolitical condition, has had a poor experience of being exposed to outsiders and strangers.<br />

If the demarcation that separated the Greek world from others was not fixed and its cultural space was<br />

always open to strangers (the only marker of distinction being solely in the use of the Greek language), in<br />

the Japanese culture the whole society is structured on the principle of distinction between “insider and<br />

outsider.” <strong>The</strong> Greek urge toward openness and universality was to be further strengthened by the Pauline<br />

revolution of Christianity in Europe, whereas in Japan its deep-grained tendency to distinguish the inner<br />

and the outside and then valorize the former was to be further consolidated by the two occasions of long<br />

seclusion policy, the first one in the period from 10th to 13th century for about 300 years and then the<br />

second one in the Edo period for about 250 years. In this way, the so-called primitive “village mentality”<br />

was preserved together with the principle of “insider and outsider” distinction, which exerted and in a<br />

sense still exerts its formative power in the basic conceptions of not only family and the country but also<br />

international relations.<br />

Now, the structure of subjectivity that will be formed under this temporal and spatial dispensation of the<br />

Japanese culture would be easy to surmise. Time will not structure itself, be it at the individual or at the<br />

historical plane, to bring about a trans-natural horizon: on the contrary, it can easily merge itself with<br />

nature at large. <strong>The</strong> subjectivity of such disposition is a far cry from the one formed in the Judeo-Christian<br />

tradition where time structures itself, at the supernatural level, in the contractual relationship between man<br />

and God. In short, time in the Japanese culture is not conducive to nurturing the independent and integral<br />

subjectivity. By the same token, the perception of space in the Japanese culture is prone to turn a blind eye<br />

to what is unfamiliar and foreign. <strong>The</strong> subjectivity formed in such a culture structures itself in a kind of<br />

narcissistic way and has a difficulty in breaking off and going beyond the horizon in which it always and<br />

already finds its cozy habitation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> conclusion Kato’s diagnosis reached that the essentials of the Japanese culture lie in its predilection<br />

for “here and how” sounds unexciting. Of course, he does not fail to see its positive aspects, especially<br />

in the exemplary instance of refinement in literature (e.g., haiku), painting (e.g. the Rimpa schools 7 ),<br />

7 Subjectification of the suibokuga (painting in India ink of Chinese origin).<br />

228


architecture (e.g., the tea-ceremony room) and folk craft. <strong>The</strong>se are the rare products the culture of “here<br />

and now” can take proud in, but they are almost all of them limited in the fields of esthetics. In other areas,<br />

particularly, history and philosophy, there are not many the culture of “here and now” can boast of in way<br />

of things or ideas. And the last thing it can boast of is its manifestation in the socio-political dimension:<br />

so-called “village mentality” and the structure of non-individualized subjectivity. That Space and Time in<br />

Japanese Culture concludes with a chapter that deals with the problem of exodus from “here and now”<br />

tells a lot about this state of affairs. To Kato’s ambivalent mind, the Japanese culture is praiseworthy in its<br />

esthetic dimension but as a political entity it is an ideological field to get away from.<br />

3-2. Maruyama<br />

Masao Maruyama was similarly concerned with and about the traditional cultural milieu of what Kato<br />

calls “here and now”. For, as they understood it, the persistence of the pre-modern mentality, was a<br />

good deal responsible for the devastating results of WWII. This recognition was decisive in their future<br />

intellectual career. (When the war ended Maruyama was at the age of 26 and Kato 21.) <strong>The</strong>y were at<br />

one in thinking that the atrocious devastation of WWII had its origins in (a) the failure of modernization<br />

in its spiritual enlightenment and (b) the underestimated tenacity of the undercurrent of pre-modern<br />

mentality (the so-called “village mentality”), which had been fully manipulated for the service of fascism.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Japanese version of modernization was underdone in that it neglected to implant the “individual”<br />

and integral subjectivity, one of its essential components in its cultural soil, which alone could have<br />

countervailed the political manipulation of pre-modern emotions. Maruyama, therefore, took upon<br />

himself the twofold project that aims at firstly (a) an installation of an ideological apparatus, with which<br />

to help create the “individual” and integral subjectivity and secondly (b) an archeological study on the<br />

obstinate undercurrent of the pre-modern mentality --- he calls this obstinate undercurrent famously the<br />

“basso ostinato” of the Japanese cultural tradition. <strong>The</strong> investigation into the “basso ostinato” was done<br />

with vigor and rigor, for instance, in <strong>The</strong> Japanese Thought (1961) and Thought and Behavior in Modern<br />

Japanese Politics (enlarged ed. 1964), the latter being a study about its tenacious manifestations in modern<br />

Japan.<br />

Unlike the archeological study of “basso ostinato,” the attempt to install an ideological apparatus to<br />

foster the integral subjectivity is entrammelled with difficulties. Maruyama perceived that to realize the<br />

integral subjectivity, something of a superstructure approaching Judeo-Christian God would have been in<br />

order. He called this something “Das Allgemeine” and took to an arduous task of searching in the course<br />

of Japanese intellectual tradition after the very moments in which the seminal occasion for providing<br />

“Das Allgemeine” was left undiscovered. On one occasion, he believed that he found a version of “Das<br />

Allgemeine” in the thought of a Confucianist (in the person of Ogyu Sorai 1666-1728) and his school in<br />

229<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Tugawa era. <strong>The</strong> study was published as Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan (1952)<br />

but was criticized for being tainted by his wishful interpretation. On another occasion, this time more<br />

ingenious, he thought he could retrieve a kind of hidden “Das Allgemeine” by looking closely into the<br />

thought and behavior of those revolutionaries in Meiji era who fought out in the midst of the horns of a<br />

dilemma between pledged loyalty and self-convinced revolts. 8 Set in the context of the Meiji Revolution,<br />

when the choice of allegiance (whether to the Emperor or to the Shogun) was as crucial as the decision as<br />

to whether or not to end the seclusion polity, 9 the questioning of loyalty-or-revolts seems to have carried<br />

the theoretical possibility of bringing about a version of “Das Allgemeine.” Frankly, I cannot tell whether<br />

it has achieved its end or not. But what eventually matters is Maruyama’s impassioned search for “Das<br />

Allgemeine” --- the search as obstinate as is the presence of the “basso ostinato” of the Japanese culture.<br />

3-3. Izutsu<br />

If Kato and Maruyama had to find in the culture of “here and now” something seriously problematic,<br />

Izutsu saw in it an occasion for philosophical possibility. At the beginning of his philosophical reflection<br />

was a mysterious experience that Zen Buddhism apparently opened up for him. It was literally beyond<br />

description and it was precisely this unnamable that he decided to take up as the object of his lifelong<br />

scholarly analysis. It is no coincidence, therefore, that his consistent concern was with the questioning of<br />

the relation between “concept and reality,” or differently put between “articulation and experience.”<br />

Now, what is the reality-experience of Zen that is by nature beyond description? From the outset, there<br />

is an insuperable difficulty because the philosophy of Zen, i.e., the philosophical elaboration of Zen<br />

experience, is itself a contradiction in terms. If philosophy implies the process of “rational, discursive<br />

thinking and conceptualization,” then the Zen experience, its analytic object, will defy any kind of such<br />

process.<br />

[T]he Zen student is always rigorously admonished not to fall into the pitfall of conceptualization<br />

and ratiocination. He is to grasp the ‘truth’ [‘reality’] directly through an act of spiritual realization,<br />

away from all entanglements of thought. <strong>The</strong> intricacies of conceptual thinking about the ‘truth’<br />

[‘reality’] are of such a nature that they inevitably induce the Zen student to deviate from the right<br />

path, thereby closing the door to the ‘real’ --- as Zen understands it --- experience of reality. And,<br />

as a matter of fact, there have occurred in the past not a few cases of philosophical distortion of<br />

Zen, i.e., the rational or intellectual manipulation of Zen ideas by those ‘philosophers’ who have no<br />

8 Loyalty and Revolt (Tokyo: Chikumashobo, 1992).<br />

9 “Revere/Restore the Emperor and Expel the Foreigners”; “Loyalty to the Emperor” vs. “Adherence to the Shogunate.”<br />

230


experiential grasp of them. 10<br />

<strong>The</strong> reality-experience of Zen is immediate in its grasp. Any mediatory access to it, be it conceptual,<br />

rational, or intellectual, is not only wrong but also misleading. 11 <strong>The</strong> reality-experience that lies at the heart<br />

of Zen is something absolute and prior to any act of articulation. In a word, it is ineffable. <strong>The</strong> greatest<br />

paradox of Zen, however, is that “the non-articulated does not remain eternally non-articulated.” In fact,<br />

“it cannot but express itself --- in language.” This is by any account a non sequitur for those who are<br />

familiar with the Western philosophical tradition, at the base of which lies rational. But Izutsu insists, “[t]<br />

he emergence of language out of the Zen awareness of reality may ontologically be described as an event<br />

of the self-articulation of the non-articulation.” How can we make out this mysterious phenomenon?<br />

Fortunately, a hint or clue can be found in the history of Western philosophy. <strong>The</strong> Zen awareness of non-<br />

articulated reality bears a likeness to the position and awareness inherent in nominalism in medieval<br />

Scholasticism. Nominalism, as it was unfolded in the so-called “controversy of universals”, is the “doctrine<br />

that universals or general ideas are mere names without any corresponding reality.” In other words,<br />

nothing really exists but particular and singular objects. <strong>The</strong> question that immediately arises is how to<br />

grasp these particular objects without the mediatory assistance of general concepts, that is, linguistic<br />

articulation. <strong>The</strong> whole problem is bound up with the fundamental assumption that linguistic articulation<br />

is conceptual generalization. Imagine the case that we had to grasp a particular object without recourse to<br />

any general concepts and ideas, and we can see the type of difficulty, with which the Zen reflections are<br />

supposed to grope their way. <strong>The</strong>ir end is the immediate grasping (not begreifen but greifen) of a particular<br />

reality. And, importantly, nothing is more particular and singular than a reality “here and now.”<br />

Now, as the analogy of nominalism implies, the opposite of the Zen type of reality-recognition is the one<br />

which harbors the aspirations toward and the predilection for the universal (as opposed to the particular).<br />

If the Zen type of reality-recognition aspires to the immediate grasping of the particular reality (“here<br />

and now”), then the universalist type aspires to reach the universal reality (“the transcendent”). <strong>The</strong>re are<br />

then two types of reality, one particular-oriented, the other universal-oriented, and they are diametrically<br />

opposed one to the other in the vector of valorization. Usually the distinction between two opposing types<br />

of “reality” is emphasized neither in Western philosophy nor in Eastern thought. According to Izutsu,<br />

10 Toward a Philosophy of Zen Buddhism (Boulder, Colorado: Prajňā Press, 1982, p. x; originally Tehran: Imperial Iranian<br />

Academy of Philosophy, 1977).<br />

11 “[T]he world of Zen is a world of silence. [...] Philosophically, the Silence is the metaphysical Oneness of absolute nonarticulation,<br />

the reality before it is articulated into myriads of forms --- ‘your own Face which you had prior to the birth<br />

of your father and mother’, as Zen often says.” (pp. x-xi).<br />

231<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

however, the distinction actually belongs to one of the prerequisite knowledge in the tradition of Islam<br />

philosophy. <strong>The</strong> universal-oriented reality is called “māhīyah” and the particular-oriented, “huwīyah.”<br />

Taking advantage of this basic recognition, Izutsu went on to build a synchronic system of oriental<br />

religious experiences in his landmark study Consciousness and Essence (1983). Here I cannot enter<br />

into any detail about this fascinating work. All I can and must do for the present purposes is to make the<br />

following three points.<br />

Firstly, the fundamental distinction of “māhīyah” and “huwīyah” in Islam philosophy gave rise to, in its<br />

curious transaction with medieval European philosophy, a pair of important terms in Scholasticism, viz.<br />

“quidditas” and “haecceitas.” <strong>The</strong> Latin terms are said to be invented by Duns Scotus (c. 1266-1308) and<br />

their dictionary definition says, “Whereas haecceity refers to aspects of a thing which make it a particular<br />

thing, quiddity refers to the universal qualities of a thing, its “whatness.” <strong>The</strong> “māhīyah” means literally<br />

“what it is” (in conceptual articulation) and it is, therefore, together with quidditas, a descendant of the<br />

Aristotelian “to ti en einai.” It is concerned with “essentia” (in contradistinction to “existentia”) insofar as<br />

it is grasped in conceptual articulation. <strong>The</strong> “huwīyah reality, in contrast, has nothing to with conceptual<br />

recognition. It is interesting to note in passing that when Duns Scotus (alias, Doctus Subtilis) regarded<br />

haecceitas as “ultima realitas entis” (the ultimate reality of being) he came close in spite of himself to the<br />

Zen master.<br />

Secondly, the oriental philosophy (including that of Zen), in Izutsu’s view, is largely characterized by<br />

its familiarity with depths psychology. <strong>The</strong> ultimate reality is believed to reveal itself from the profound<br />

realm of the unconscious. <strong>The</strong> unconscious realm is therefore not monolithic but conceived as layered<br />

strata of different degrees of unconsciousness. <strong>The</strong> function of ordinary language that articulates through<br />

concepts is there replaced by symbolic signs and images. If the ultimate case of haecceitas (the “here and<br />

now” recognition) is “an event of the self-articulation of the non-articulation,” it could be only grasped by<br />

means of these symbolic signs and images. And it should not be forgotten that since the case of haecceitas<br />

defies any form of conceptual articulation, it belongs to an instance not of “esentia” but of “existentia.”<br />

Thirdly, and this brings us to the conclusion of the present paper, i.e., the proper recognition in a binary<br />

opposition of the two types of reality, “māhīyah” and “huwīyah,” “quidditas” and “haecceitas,” or “esentia”<br />

and “existentia” will be useful, in several ways, for our purpose of configuring the postwar Japanese<br />

thought. As we have seen, Kato’s attitude to the Japanese culture is divided between his criticism of things<br />

political and his admiration of things esthetic. In the light of the two-reality perspective, it now becomes<br />

clear that his criticism is done on the side of “māhīyah,” “quidditas,” or “essentia” while his admiration<br />

of “here and now” on the side of “huwīyah,” “haecceitas” or “existentia.” <strong>The</strong> ambivalence he shows<br />

in his attitude to the Japanese culture is, as it turns out, actually a proof of his well-rounded perception<br />

232


on the two types of reality. <strong>The</strong> same holds true of Maruyama’s invention of the working hypothesis of<br />

“Das Allgemeine,” a version of “māhīyah”-“quidditas”-“esentia” principle that is wanting in the Japanese<br />

culture of “here and now.” Finally, Izutsu’s attempt at a synchronic system-building on the reality-<br />

recognition of haecceitas (“here and now”) gives us an occasion to recognize that the philosophysing on<br />

the basis of nothingness cannot be a monopoly of Japanese philosophy but is rather prevalent among the<br />

traditions of Asian thought.<br />

All in all, if one has to present a characteristic picture of Japanese culture in its nature and structure, it<br />

should be a dynamic one that has in mind the two types of reality, with “māhīyah”- “quidditas”-“essentia”<br />

on the one hand and “huwīyah,” “haecceitas” and “existentia” on the other. Must there be a room for what<br />

Kato calls “here and now,” there must be, in the same vein, a passionate regard to what Maruyama calls<br />

“Das Allgemeine.” This, in fine, is the lesson the great three masters of the postwar Japan has left for us<br />

for our frame of reference.<br />

4. Types of Healing and Cultural Difference<br />

My observation on the 3.11 disaster suggested that there be at least two kinds of calamities and these<br />

in turn require two kinds of healing. <strong>The</strong> kind of healing effective in dealing with natural disasters like<br />

earthquakes and tsunami is, it is easy to imagine, different from the kind of healing operative in the case<br />

of man-made calamities like radioactive contamination. If the former requires a hard and thorny course<br />

of affective adjustments, the latter calls for an arduous and persistent process of rational explication of the<br />

real facts of the case.<br />

My observation on the twofold disaster of the 3.11 also suggested that the Japanese culture seems to be<br />

characterized by its innate strengths in healing those who have suffered from natural disasters, while it<br />

is not well equipped with the healing resources in dealing with the victims of man-made disasters. This<br />

hunch of mine is corroborated by looking at the three representative thinkers of the twentieth century,<br />

who examined the nature and structure of the Japanese culture from their own respective standpoints.<br />

Based on the fundamental distinction in reality-recognition between “existentia” (“here and now”) and<br />

“essentia” (the transcendent), the three thinkers were of the opinion that the Japanese culture is far and<br />

away more predisposed to “existentia” (“here and now”) than to “essentia” (“universal and eternal,”<br />

i.e., the transcendent). For the cultural tendency of constant focus on “here and now” helps to create an<br />

environment (both human and natural) that is favorable to affective adjustments. In contrast, it would<br />

be largely for want of “essentia” perspective that those responsible for the management and control of<br />

nuclear power behaved so poorly.<br />

233<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Now, if the above holds true, further reflections are in order by way of conclusion. <strong>The</strong> Japanese culture,<br />

as it so happens, shows its inveterate attachment to the mode of “here and now,” which accommodates<br />

the people, in terms of healing, to natural disasters relatively better than others. In reverse is the case with<br />

regard to the man-made disaster and its healing. This means, to look at it from another perspective, that<br />

there can be another culture, where the two kinds of healing are differently disposed, where the people<br />

find it easier to be healed in the process of rational conviction than in the course of affective adjustments.<br />

Which type of healing has a better hand is decided by the nature and structure of a given culture. What<br />

is important, therefore, is the cultural self-knowledge. It is all the more important because culture is so<br />

programmed as to look natural and transparent to those inside, and those inside tend to be blind to the<br />

nature and structure of their culture.<br />

234


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

phenomena, their relation to mankind, their relation to me and my experiences are always being examined<br />

and analyzed in the humanities. If we exclude the meaning of things in my life and others’ lives in<br />

the humanities, it will become a very ambiguous discipline with uncertain identities. <strong>The</strong>re could be<br />

criticism on how subjective and first-person perspectives can lead to knowledge. As people in today’s<br />

society believe that scientific knowledge is the essence of knowledge, knowledge of the humanities is<br />

often considered fake knowledge or an arbitrary attitude toward life. <strong>The</strong>re have been and will be a lot<br />

of discussions on how we should define the characteristics of knowledge of the humanities. In order for<br />

the humanities to secure its strong identity in the current era with highly-segmented disciplines, it should<br />

have its own unique methodology and contents that stand out from other natural sciences and social<br />

science disciplines. And it should be held accountable for its unique identity as an independent academic<br />

discipline.<br />

Consilience, or the unity of knowledge, which has been promoted by some evolutionists and scientists<br />

as a breakthrough method of integrating different disciplines, is essentially about integrating the study<br />

of humanities’ understanding of people in natural science. It makes the understanding of people remain<br />

superficial and on the brief end of the spectrum. <strong>The</strong> study of humanities is a discipline based on thorough<br />

and serious self-examination and its therapeutic power originates from having a deep understanding of the<br />

inside of people. <strong>The</strong> study of humanities as means for healing is not a science discipline; rather, it is more<br />

like religion or arts. Unlike artistic work and religious belief, however, the humanities attempt to build a<br />

house in a systematic manner and to develop necessary tools and sophisticated skill-set training methods.<br />

As anyone can go into and come out from the house that is built in such a systematic manner, it can be<br />

said that the humanities have openness and flexibility. Openness and flexibility of the humanities can be<br />

regarded arbitrary when compared with objective knowledge concepts discussed by natural scientists.<br />

However, that is where the unique power of the humanities comes from. <strong>The</strong> power of the humanities<br />

lies in free and creative spirit and thoughts of people. <strong>The</strong> study of humanities builds a house based on<br />

thorough reasoning and critical thinking experiments conducted on humans. <strong>The</strong> world and people seen<br />

through the process of building the house in freedom encourage people to reflect on their lives and build<br />

a better understanding of their sorrows and emotional roots. Healing in the humanities comes from soul-<br />

searching and introspective understanding of people. We first need to understand the world we live in<br />

when we want to make peace with the world while we need to understand our being and life in order to<br />

heal the pain we experience.<br />

Given the premise that healing in the humanities is based on introspection and good understanding<br />

of human being, what does ‘the healing of the humanities’ mean? It starts from considering the study<br />

of humanities itself as the target domain to be introspected. <strong>The</strong> tradition of the humanities has been<br />

formulated based on the text called ‘Cannon’ both in the western and eastern parts of the world. <strong>The</strong><br />

236


have some degree of universality. Although the conscious ‘I’ of women is unstable in metaphysical<br />

philosophy just like the conscious ‘I’ of people in general, there have been people who were called ‘women’<br />

in the Confucius patriarchal culture throughout history. <strong>The</strong>y were called ‘women’ and those women<br />

formed the foundation for conducting the analysis of social reality (systematic reality such as religion,<br />

laws and politics). <strong>The</strong> perception or the ‘will to the truth’ to figure out and explore the truth in the social<br />

reality paved the way for feminist philosophy.<br />

By reflecting upon this form of the existence of women, the humanities will experience healing in two<br />

ways. On the one hand, the healing of the humanities themselves and, on the other, the healing of women<br />

who have long been considered mere objects. Such process of healing can only be possible by having<br />

a reflective and soul-searching attitude. Reflectivity, one of the important methods used in philosophy,<br />

is essential in feminist theories (Harding 1991, 149-50, 161-63; Harding 1998, 188-94). Philosophical<br />

reasoning cannot be made without having critical attitudes. In order to remain critical of something,<br />

you have to keep a certain distance from the object for a while. <strong>The</strong> distance should not be too long, too<br />

far or too separated. When the negative connotations of critical mindset are pulled out, we get to meet<br />

with a reflective attitude. Reflectivity is created when the person is not too far from the object and is<br />

not entrapped in the object; rather, reflectivity is created when the person is able to go in and out of the<br />

object freely. That is why I would like to call reflectivity ‘thinking at the boundary.’ Reflecting on women<br />

and women’s experiences is a method to look into the lives of women who have remained invisible and<br />

inaudible in history so far.<br />

Those who examine the lives of women are typically not in a position with power or privilege because<br />

they are not in an absolute third-party position where they can form an appropriate distance from the<br />

object - not too far and not too close to the object. <strong>The</strong>y are in a constantly changing position, not in a<br />

fixated position. This position is a good way of making the object visible and expressing the objective<br />

features of the object. When determining the object, those who examine the object should continue to<br />

ask questions about this position in order not to be affected by prejudice based on bias and stereotypes.<br />

When approaching reflectivity based on the concept of ‘for self-examination, of self-examination and<br />

about self-examination…,’ self-examination can be degraded to a mere theoretical concept of ‘infinite<br />

regress.’ In order to avoid such infinite regress, we have to keep a critical distance from the object for<br />

self-examination. That is, we have to break away from asking speculative questions without having any<br />

relations with the object and look into the object only in the dynamics of relationship with the object. In<br />

this way, we will be able to avoid the infinite regress of ‘for self-examination, of self-examination and<br />

about self-examination….’<br />

239<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

3. Female North Korean Defectors and <strong>The</strong>ir Experiences<br />

We need to keep an objective distance while being empathetic about women in order to understand the<br />

true reality of women’s experiences. Korean women have undergone various experiences throughout<br />

the eventful journey of Korean history. As they experienced both the third world and the first world, an<br />

unprecedented and unique history of experiences is depicted by Korean women. Recently, there are newly<br />

emerging social phenomena triggered by the emergence of North Korean defectors in Korean society.<br />

Over 70% of them are women and their painful and traumatic experiences are as diverse and complicated<br />

as the experiences of South Korean women. <strong>The</strong>refore, I would like to explore the issue of female North<br />

Korean defectors based on feminist reflectivity.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Phenomenon of North Korean residents defecting from North Korea has become a familiar<br />

phenomenon in recent years. So it is not difficult to find North Korean defectors around us. As of 2012,<br />

Ewha Womans University received 11 North Korean defector students (a gross total of 20) and the<br />

number is expected to grow further down the road. <strong>The</strong> number of North Korean defectors was fewer than<br />

1,000 even in the early 1990s and surpassed 10,000 in 2007 and 20,000 in just three years in 2010 (as of<br />

Nov 15, 2010). <strong>The</strong> average number of new North Korean defectors is estimated to be 3,000 a year, while<br />

the number of North Korean defectors in China stands at 30,000~50,000 according to the 2005 survey.<br />

<strong>The</strong> number began to grow drastically since 1998, and about 78% of North Korean defectors are women.<br />

<strong>The</strong> number of North Korean defectors grew markedly as North Korea underwent hardships, experienced<br />

the collapse of its social system and the number of people who died of hunger increased during the period<br />

of 1995-98. After the North Korean government began to distribute meals to only a limited number of<br />

workers, the socialist rationing system in the country began to fail and collapsed eventually, forcing North<br />

Korean residents to secure food for themselves and their family members. Since the year 1998, female<br />

North Korean defectors have been literally “sold” to China (the fact the phrase ‘sold’ is used for women<br />

living in the civilized world of the 21st century and the fact that such a disparaging phrase is used for<br />

the victims of human trafficking is lamentable) to take care of their parents, husbands or children, some<br />

voluntarily and some not-so-voluntarily. <strong>The</strong> reason many female North Korean residents escape from<br />

North Korea is that the North Korean government carries out a massive search for the missing head of<br />

family when the head goes missing under the country’s feudal patriarchal family system and that it is<br />

much easier for women to survive in China when they escape from North Korea. For example, many<br />

female North Korean defectors had to be engaged in the business of human trafficking organizations in<br />

China. <strong>The</strong> above example shows us the sorrow of female North Korean defectors had to experience. One<br />

Korean-Chinese female historian portrayed the tragic reality of facing North Korean defectors, saying<br />

that “although we are not in war, about half of our people are in worse situations than the comfort women<br />

240


during the Japanese colonization period.”<br />

In order to understand the difficulties facing female North Korean defectors, we need to understand<br />

the lives of female North Korean defectors themselves and the life of women in North Korea. <strong>The</strong><br />

experiences of female North Korea defectors in North Korea, South Korea and China are hard to be<br />

generalized because individual experiences are formulated based on many different conditions. Hence,<br />

it is challenging to trace diverse experiences and, at the same time, it is important to look into the culture<br />

of North Korea as the perspective or worldview that constitutes the dominant perception of them, which<br />

is essential to build a better understanding of emotional and cultural incongruity of female North Korean<br />

defectors in the Korean society. Vice Principal Cho Myung-Sook mentioned three kinds of culture<br />

defining North Korean society. First is the Confucian patriarchal culture, which culminates in the worship<br />

of the Dear Leader and forms a political hierarchical structure that has taken firm root in North Korean<br />

society. Second is militaristic culture, which is straightforward and extreme and constitutes a method of<br />

survival – survive or die. In North Korea’s militaristic culture, residents become aggressive and get away<br />

with doing bad things under extreme situations, making people make more desperate efforts to ‘win or<br />

die,’ rather than learning the virtue of tolerance. Such attitudes of North Korean defectors are considered<br />

‘brazen’ in South Korean society, resulting in the further marginalization of North Korean defectors. Third<br />

is materialistic culture. <strong>The</strong> attitude that North Korean defectors show about God in Christianity, saying<br />

‘we have been lied to and fooled by visible things and people, so how can we believe in invisible things?’,<br />

highlights the cold and cynical mindset North Korean residents have about non-materialistic values. This<br />

also makes us think that it would be possible that North Korean society might put more emphasis on<br />

materialistic values than South Korean society does. North Korean people tend to believe that what they<br />

have to believe in is only ‘money and power in the hands of them,’ and North Korean society overflows<br />

with such materialistic attitudes.<br />

1) Confucius Patriarchal Culture<br />

Confucius patriarchal culture constitutes a foundation of both North Korean and South Korean societies.<br />

In the case of North Korea, Confucius patriarchal culture has been strengthened to sustain the country’s<br />

political, legal and cultural system of ‘worshiping the Great Leader’ and affects economically-active North<br />

Korean women in a paradoxical and comprehensive manner. One research paper stated that the prolonged<br />

economic difficulties in North Korea “allow the government and men to intervene in the activities of<br />

women in the form of systematic suppression, physical violence and bureaucratic exploitation” (Hong<br />

Min 2010, 6). In the name of supervising and managing residents, men take advantage of and suppress<br />

women inside and outside of home in everyday life. Inside the home, women are dependent family<br />

members who rely on the male head of family for survival. Let us take a little closer look at North Korea’s<br />

241<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Confucius patriarchal culture as follows:<br />

- Residential system based on patriarchal family system: In North Korea, there are patriarchal family<br />

documents that constitute the basis for the patriarchal family system. <strong>The</strong> late North Korean leader<br />

Kim Il-Sung ordered a dictionary-like resident document to be made and established a designated<br />

organization under the Resident Security Administration. Later, Kim Jeong-Il ordered to ‘re-examine the<br />

country’s thoughts and ideology’ and the designated organization investigated residents and purged the<br />

oppression forces. As complaints were raised, those who were involved in the activities of ‘Shim-hwa-<br />

jo (reformation)’ were sent to the reformation center for punishment. “If men (the head of family) or<br />

other family members were ‘involved in scandal or incident,’ all the family members, including the head<br />

of family, are held accountable for the problem under the guilt-by-association system and are penalized<br />

under the law (subject to reformation, rather than putting the issue to the court)” (Choi Jin-Lee 2010, 74).<br />

In this case, women become dependent in a subordinate relationship with the male head of family under<br />

the North Korean legal system.<br />

- Discrimination against single women: Single women are excluded from the allocation of houses under<br />

the national resident protection system and prohibited from taking business trips overseas. Married women<br />

are allowed to work within the residential area of her spouse.<br />

- Gender discrimination in food distribution: On July 1st, 2002, the North Korean government decided to<br />

exclude women from the target list for food distribution (at the official price that is one hundredth of the<br />

market price). Since then, women were forced to be engaged in economic activities and had to purchase<br />

rice at market price and the market was considered the place only for women, forcing women into a<br />

desperate situation to make money to survive. That is why women were forced to be engaged in economic<br />

activities on the market in North Korea. When the volume of food the male family head received from the<br />

government is small, women had no other choice but to leave the country to work to support their family<br />

members.<br />

- Gender discrimination in education and labor: Although the North Korean government promoted the<br />

policy of ensuring equality in provision of educational opportunities, such a policy was used as a mere<br />

mechanism to reinforce the power of the governing class. Social background is one of the factors limiting<br />

educational opportunities (e.g. entering into prestigious universities) in North Korea and women are<br />

concentrated in commercial colleges, light industry, nursing and educational colleges. In those typical<br />

sectors where women are concentrated, women receive less pay and are treated unfairly and they even<br />

take discrimination for granted. <strong>The</strong> following is what a North Korean woman had to say about the<br />

discrimination she faced:<br />

242


Since my father was in a coal mine, I naturally thought I have to work in the coal mine too. So<br />

I don’t get discouraged or helpless because of discrimination. Even when we are engaged in the<br />

same work, men have their responsibilities and their share of consequences. Men are men. Women<br />

can work in the positions like a manager or supervisor of the restaurant or warehouse but I know<br />

that higher-level positions are open only for men. Plus, men get paid more even when men and<br />

women work the same hours. You know men are the head of family and thus they should get paid<br />

more. I don’t think it is discrimination (Go Young-Soon 2009, Hong Min 2010, 10).<br />

In North Korea, male workers are assigned to white collar work positions while women workers are<br />

assigned to less paying and harder work. Well paying hard work involving machinery or equipment is<br />

said to be given to male workers. According to Choi Jin-Lee, delivering goods on ox cart in rural areas,<br />

driving heavy machinery and other work that doesn’t require using cold water or using spade to cultivate<br />

farmland are all given to male workers. On the other hand, female workers have to be involved in harder<br />

work using cold water, bending the body forward to plant rice plants and weed rice paddies until finger<br />

nails crack. Still, female workers in North Korea get paid less than the male workers (Choi Jin-Lee 2010,<br />

76).<br />

- <strong>The</strong> market as the place for women: According to the Confucius value of the traditional four classes<br />

of society (scholars, farmers, artisans and tradesmen), in North Korea it is considered ‘embarrassing,’<br />

shameful and low class to be engaged in trade. <strong>The</strong> official labor-force world is considered the domain of<br />

male workers whereas family and marketplace are considered personal places and the domain for female<br />

workers. <strong>The</strong> market is considered a private space in North Korea because the socialist North Korean<br />

government views the market as a place where private economic activities take place. According to one<br />

research paper, “the North Korean authorities forced female merchants to ‘wear skirts’ in the market,<br />

showing the fact that there is strong social prejudice in North Korean society.” <strong>The</strong> market is not properly<br />

recognized as the official economic activity place and therefore those involved in market activities are<br />

excluded from social security benefits while they had to work constantly to ‘earn bread’ as the bread<br />

earners of family (Hong Min 2010, 12). As North Korea promotes socialist economy, the market is<br />

regarded as the private space - not the official space - that is managed mainly by women. Women are also<br />

obliged to take part in political activities of civil groups in addition to taking care of their regular hard<br />

work. Due to the heavy burden of work and having to make money to support other family members,<br />

female North Korean workers often suffer from malnutrition, various diseases and other problems in the<br />

process of pregnancy, childbirth and childcare. Without receiving any benefits from the socialist regime,<br />

those female workers in North Korea are merely taking on all familial responsibilities under North Korea’s<br />

patriarchal family system. In North Korea, it can be stated that women are placed on the periphery of the<br />

authoritative society or on the periphery of the country’s patriarchal family system.<br />

243<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

- Sexual exploitation: North Korean women have been exposed to sexual exploitation and forced to<br />

provide sexual favor as bribes to make a living since the 1990s. As husbands do not assume family<br />

responsibilities and the government turns a blind eye to the harsh reality facing women, women are<br />

exposed to psychological, linguistic and physical violence perpetrated by men in the market and other<br />

places for economic activities. Most women who have participated in market activities reported that they<br />

were harassed by police, market managers, party officials, transportation workers and soldiers. Hong Min<br />

called such a frame in North Korea the structure of government public officials and men living off women<br />

and exploiting and sexually harassing women. One North Korean defector said “there is a saying that<br />

female merchants and workers on the train are served for safety officers,” a vivid example showing the<br />

harsh reality facing women in North Korea.<br />

<strong>The</strong> emphasis on “innocent and obedient women”: Many pregnant female North Korean defectors<br />

who were caught and repatriated by Chinese authorities were forced to go through abortions or kill<br />

the infant right after giving birth, believing ‘they were not being faithful and became pregnant with<br />

Chinese seed.’ In extreme cases, pregnant women died in the process (Choi Jin-Lee 2010, 79).<br />

- A male-oriented society: According to Choi Jin-Lee, women are considered to have about “50%”<br />

of physical and psychological capacity of men in North Korea. And after getting married, women are<br />

considered “sexual slaves in male-oriented society and their positions in the family are relatively low due<br />

to social and systematic reasons. <strong>The</strong>refore, women should be obedient in the face of violence perpetrated<br />

by predatory men in North Korean society (it is prohibited to defy male violence)” (Choi Jin-Lee 2010,<br />

77).<br />

2) Military Culture<br />

It is a widely-known fact that North Korean society is established based on military culture. As the history<br />

of North Korea is formed through the male-oriented anti-Japanese reform movements, women have been<br />

strictly excluded in North Korean history (Hong Min 2010, 8). <strong>The</strong> establishment of North Korea is based<br />

on the concept of reformist protests and armed struggle. In addition, constant anti-American protests,<br />

military confrontations with South Korea and efforts to bring down the South Korean government have<br />

played a pivotal role in the political operations of North Korea, justifying chauvinistic culture and thus<br />

marginalizing women in North Korean society. Hong Min’s approach is worthy of consideration: “Women<br />

can register their name only when their names are called by the Dear Leader Kim Il-Sung and his anti-<br />

Japanese reformist forces. Anti-Japanese armed protest and movements are merely a means of portraying<br />

women as ‘faithful and selfless wives.’ In North Korea, the Dear Leader Kim Il-Sung was above the law,<br />

implicitly allowing other men in North Korean to behave like the Dear Leader in their respective homes.<br />

244


Such a political regime was the reason behind violence running rampant at homes in North Korea” (Hong<br />

Min 2010, 8).<br />

- Authoritative and violent domestic culture: North Korea’s patriarchal family system put more<br />

emphasis on ‘keeping men’s appearance’ and ‘men reigning over women’ rather than on men assuming<br />

responsibility as the breadwinner of the family. <strong>The</strong> financial difficulties forced North Korean housewives<br />

to bear the double burden of domestic and outside work, taking care of house chores, childcare as well as<br />

making money to support her family members. Under the North Korean patriarchal family system, men<br />

don’t have to work hard to provide for their families and so they behave like parasites on women. Choi<br />

Jin-Lee stated that “North Korean men are brutally beating their wives again and again and there is no<br />

legal system in the country to protect battered wives” (Hong Min 2010, 8).<br />

- Devaluing life: In North Korea, the issue of abortion is very serious and there are no proper measures to<br />

protect maternity rights.<br />

As North Korea was in a state of war and under many other urgent financial circumstances and as gender<br />

equality was being promoted as part of socialist values, women were expected to work the same hours as<br />

men. Hard and grueling work that women had to perform in North Korea was considered reasonable in<br />

North Korean society, where feudal Confucian culture is combined with the socialist gender-equality in a<br />

weird manner, placing women under the multi-layered oppressive culture. North Korea’s military culture<br />

allowed violence against women to take firm root in society. Since the economic recession in North Korea,<br />

the lives of North Korean women are deemed to be tainted with the worst combination of socialism +<br />

patriarchal family system + military culture. Amidst the collapse of the country’s free food rationing<br />

system, childcare and education and national medical care system, North Korean women became the<br />

victims who assume all the responsibility.<br />

3) Materialistic Culture<br />

According to Marx who viewed religion as the opium of the masses, religious activities in socialist<br />

societies are severely restricted. North Korea is also a socialist society with materialistic worldview<br />

where people are not allowed to have religion or freedom of thought. After going through the economic<br />

recession, North Korean people began to believe that survival is the highest value and it is extravagant to<br />

talk about other abstract philosophical values. <strong>The</strong> lives of North Korean people were focused on making<br />

money and finding foods while their philosophy was also concentrated on Juche ideology. Thus, it is no<br />

wonder that North Korean people lack the ability to think philosophically and pursue an ideal vision while<br />

focusing only on visible and materialistic things. When people put materialistic ownership before other<br />

245<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

values, their perspectives and views are changed accordingly.<br />

- Women as body: Hong Min said that “women were viewed as obedient bodies or objects that are used as<br />

labor-machines, childbirth-machines, childcare-machines and as tools for exploitation and mobilization to<br />

attain the country’s political and economic goals. In North Korea, women’s ‘bodies’ have been viewed as a<br />

tool for reproduction in the male-oriented hierarchical structure and as an industrial tool. Women’s ‘bodies’<br />

were severely consumed throughout the industrial period in the 1950~60s and women were forced to use<br />

contraceptives to control childbirth and the population in the 1970~80s. Entering into the 1990s, North<br />

Korean women were exploited as reproduction machine to replace the workers who starved to death.<br />

Women’s ‘bodies’ have been exploited as means for engaging in labor in the name of ‘protection’”(Hong<br />

Min 2010, 9). This issue facing women is not confined to North Korea. In South Korea, women<br />

have been exploited as foreigner whores, tools for Korean geisha tourism and factory workers during<br />

industrialization. As shown above, even in South Korean society, there is a social mechanism to consume<br />

female bodies as tools used in the adult entertainment industry.<br />

What is unique in North Korean society is that both male and female bodies are owned by the government.<br />

It is known that a considerable portion of income of female loggers working in Russia and female North<br />

Korean workers who have worked in Eastern European countries was by the government. North Korean<br />

people are merely viewed as labor force working for the country. Under the materialistic notion, people are<br />

degenerated into tools for sustaining politics and the labor market. Karl Marx’s worldview of promoting<br />

an ideal relationship between human beings and the world and protecting the dignity of humankind via<br />

non-marginalized true ‘labor’ was distorted and disfigured in North Korea to define people as mere labor<br />

units or means for producing economic results that are owned by the central government. <strong>The</strong> reason<br />

is perhaps that North Korea was built based on an autocratic political system, which culminates in the<br />

worship of the autocratic Great Leader.<br />

- Background (personal background and class): <strong>The</strong>re is no need to mention the significance of building<br />

materialistic foundations under the materialistic worldview. Nevertheless, the concept of such material<br />

foundation seems to be translated into a wider concept of encompassing social background of people. In<br />

North Korea, getting married for a better social status is deemed very hard. It is no exaggeration to say<br />

that personal background or material foundation is a determinant factor in defining almost everything in<br />

the North Korean society. Such personal background or material foundation has been one of the most<br />

important factors in determining people’s jobs and educational opportunities as well as marriage.<br />

In North Korea, when a lower-class person gets married to an upper-class person, their marriage is bound<br />

to fail no matter how much they love each other. For instance, if I get married to an upper-class military<br />

246


officer or undergraduate student, he would have no future because of the fact his wife is lower class. Due<br />

to the fact that his wife and families-in-laws are lower class, he is facing obstacles and suffering from<br />

disadvantages in society. If he wants to continue his married life with his lower-class wife, he would have<br />

to give up his career and social life because he would be excluded from opportunities like joining the<br />

socialist party and getting promoted to a higher position (Moon Kyung-Soon 2009, Hong Min 2010, 11).<br />

North Korea’s cultural background can be characterized into the above-mentioned three cultural<br />

characteristics. Those in the vested interests in North Korea say that it is easy to live in North Korea if<br />

you just turn a blind eye to the fatal and endemic problems existing in society. As time passes slowly and<br />

people don’t have to worry about food under socialist North Korean society, it doesn’t seem bad to live<br />

as women within a comfortable circle of life. But the problem is that such a circle is not guaranteed until<br />

death, and those within the circle have to make continued efforts to remain within the comfortable circle<br />

while feeling a sense of guilt towards those outside the circle.<br />

4. Who is Asking Us to Analyze Female North Korean Defectors?<br />

Those who major in North Korean Studies say that there are one hundred different stories when we<br />

interview one hundred North Korean defectors, indicating the difficulty of generalizing the experiences of<br />

North Korean residents defecting from the North for survival.<br />

Still, we might be able to try dividing such experiences of female North Korean defectors into the<br />

two categories: the first category of female North Korean defectors is those who arrive in China first<br />

before coming to South Korea and the second category is those who directly defect to South Korea.<br />

Vice Principal Cho Myung-Sook stated that those North Korean defectors who come directly to South<br />

Korea suffer from less emotional trauma while having a low understanding of South Korean culture and<br />

experiencing difficulties mingling with the South Korean society whereas those who cross into China first<br />

before coming to South Korea have more serious emotional trauma but have a higher understanding of<br />

South Korean society and adapt easily into society. Those who spent their adolescent years in the North<br />

Korea society during the collapse of the socialist regime after undergoing years of hardship have had a<br />

harder time adapting to South Korean society, organizational culture and educational system due to the<br />

collapse of values in their minds. It is because they tend to lack the capacity of determining what they<br />

should do and what they shouldn’t do and don’t feel any sense of guilt or shame for being illegal (In North<br />

Korea, when people live by law, they are bound to starve to death). <strong>The</strong>refore, North Korean residents tend<br />

to lack capacity to think in a rational manner, have low self-esteem as well as a low sense of responsibility<br />

unlike South Korean residents who have legitimate fundamental values and conscience. That is why<br />

North Korean defectors experience difficulty mingling with South Korean society, language and culture.<br />

247<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

<strong>The</strong> chaotic circumstances in North Korean society make North Korean people less competent in situation<br />

analysis and problem solving. That is why North Korean defectors remain on the periphery of South<br />

Korean society when they defect to the South.<br />

In South Korean society, North Korean defectors are considered ‘ignorant and unreliable people who<br />

don’t know much, people who become the burden of society, people whose minds are always on their<br />

family members left in the North, sick and chauvinistic people’(Hong Min 2010, 16). Unfortunately, we<br />

don’t know much about the current human rights conditions in the North, the physical and mental health<br />

of North Koreans and don’t even know if there are programs in South Korea designed to help them adapt<br />

to the new society. As a matter of fact, South Korea doesn’t have a well-organized and sophisticated<br />

adaptation programs for North Korean defectors. Vice Principal Cho Myung-Sook is highly skeptical of<br />

the education programs provided for North Korean adolescents who have defected to the South over the<br />

past ten years, being unsure of the effects of such education programs. In the case of female North Korean<br />

defectors, it is urgent to heal physical and emotional wounds inflicted on them. If South Korean society<br />

fails to provide healing and make them live on the periphery of the society, as it has done over the past<br />

long history of human rights violation against women, and if it just made passive efforts, it would take a<br />

step back to 50 years ago or 100 years ago. <strong>The</strong>re have already been some cases of female North Korean<br />

defectors who were degenerated into prostitution in the red-light district of Japan.<br />

<strong>The</strong> stories of North Korean defectors and North Korean women who defect to the South are still<br />

unfamiliar to many of us. Most South Korean people don’t know about North Korean culture and society,<br />

making it hard for them to understand the lives of North Korean people due to conflicting ideologies.<br />

Female North Korean defectors experience inconceivable hardship and thus get to have a complicated<br />

and protective psychological mechanism, making it difficult for others to truly understand what they have<br />

gone through and feel. As they had to undergo unimaginable sufferings and hardships, North Korean<br />

defectors don’t trust or rely on others and don’t want to talk about themselves. Recalling her stay in China,<br />

one female North Korean defector said that “Koreans are even harder to be trusted…I had many close<br />

friends but I’ve never talked about my deep feelings and problems…even when I was drunk and crying,<br />

so when my friends asked me why I’m crying. I was not able to tell them my feelings and experiences, so<br />

I just said I don’t know why I’m crying. It is hard to become true friends with them on a person to person<br />

basis…I cannot tell the truth that I’m a defector from North Korea. No, I cannot trust them” (Choi Hyun-<br />

Shil 2012, 37). <strong>The</strong> stories of female North Korean defectors are shared through word of mouth and, in<br />

some cases, they are reproduced and distributed by mostly South Korean counselors, researchers or North<br />

Korean defector-turned-researchers or counselors.<br />

How should we regard the lives of female North Korean defectors from the perspectives of reflective<br />

248


humanities and the humanities as a means for healing? Is it possible for us to remove several layers of<br />

curtains and listen to frank voices of female North Korean defectors? <strong>The</strong> documents available for us tend<br />

to be deeply affected by ideology. <strong>The</strong> documents that are used as one of the important references for this<br />

research paper are ones published at the seminar hosted by the right-wing Rep. Park Seon-Young. Left-<br />

wing politicians have low interest in the issue of North Korean defectors and thus don’t conduct research-<br />

es on them. Rep. Yim Soo-Kyung called North Korean defectors ‘traitors’ while drunk. Because of the<br />

lack of information on North Korea, we don’t know much about male and female North Korean residents,<br />

defectors and their family members who are left behind in the North, which makes it difficult for us to<br />

determine the social identity of North Korean defectors and makes us form a linear judgment about their<br />

experiences.<br />

From the philosophical point of view, it is always difficult to determine the truth of things and events.<br />

Figuring out the relationship between visible and invisible things and between the belief and the facts is a<br />

philosophical challenge. Still, in analyzing and reasoning about humankind, reflectivity in the humanities<br />

can serve as one of the useful philosophical methods. <strong>The</strong> lives of people are changed on a consistent<br />

basis, and thus it is difficult to determine our lives at one go. In order to understand the life of a person or a<br />

group, we first have to admit that our observations and viewpoints cannot remain neutral. We are looking<br />

at things in a particular context or circumstance, based on which the judgment is made. <strong>The</strong> same is true<br />

for the process of observing and understanding female North Korean defectors. We hear a lot about them<br />

both directly and indirectly and in some cases we hear from female North Korean defectors themselves.<br />

However, even if we hear directly from North Korean defectors, that doesn’t change the issue. Female<br />

North Korean defectors themselves have to recall their experiences to tell others about their defection.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, what they tell about their experiences is not always true even if the defector makes an honest<br />

statement. Reflective attitude in the humanities attempts to go in and come out from such overlapping<br />

multi-layered stories in order to view things in a more objective way (Tanesini 1999, 160-85), helping us<br />

learn how to approach the stories of people who suffer from wounds and traumatic experiences and how<br />

to show empathetic responses to such stories. When listening to the stories of North Korean defectors, we<br />

have to think about ‘who makes them speak,’ ‘who is representing them,’ ‘why they are saying such things<br />

here’ and ‘who is listening.’ Also, we have to try to understand the grammar of their language. Such multi-<br />

layered methods of looking and listening allow us to look inside and listen to the voice from inside them,<br />

thereby formulating the core of reflectivity. As explained above, reflectivity is one of the key elements<br />

exposing the objective facts (Harding 1993, 56-63).<br />

Talking about one’s experiences, looking at the experiences, listening to and writing about the experiences<br />

are essential for reflectivity. Such processes are required steps for healing. However, those North Korean<br />

defectors are not able to speak in the same manner as South Korean people and are not familiar with rhe-<br />

249<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

torical expressions and tones commonly used by South Korean people. In other words, they tend to lack<br />

adequate ways to express themselves. <strong>The</strong>re are violent and wild expressions used by North Korean peo-<br />

ple –such as “cutting one’s throat” and “cutting the throat open.” North Korean defectors have different<br />

ways of expressing themselves as opposed to South Korean people (for instance, they don’t usually say<br />

‘thank you’ to show appreciation), making them to think it would be better to remain silent to get along<br />

with South Korean people. If North Korean defectors get to learn sophisticated and elaborate methods of<br />

expressions used by South Korean people, it might be even harder for us to read their emotions hidden<br />

in the innermost corners of their heart. We ask questions and provide answers casually without putting<br />

special meaning, but such process is actually very daunting and challenging. While doing so, we express<br />

ourselves, look at and listen to others and again offer words to others. In such an interactive communica-<br />

tion process, both the speaker and listener get to intervene in the existence of each other and to experience<br />

changes in life. In order to have reflective communication, those engaged in communication must be<br />

truthful and sincere. When people talk to each other in an insincere manner, they are not considered to be<br />

having reflective communication and not able to talk to and listen to each other in a truthful way.<br />

How can we build truthfulness and sincere attitude? If they are built through the language engagement<br />

process of speaking, talking and listening, we would fall into a cycle. Donald Davidson, an American phi-<br />

losopher, talked about the principle of tolerance saying that we have to assume that the person is talking<br />

the truth so as to have truthful and sincere communication in the primitive interpretation process (Davidson<br />

1984, 134-37). Only when we assume that the person we are talking to is telling us the truth, are we able<br />

to continue the dialogue. In this manner, the truthfulness of both the speaker and listener is part of the in-<br />

tuitive requirements in communication (Kim Heisook 1999, 208-11). <strong>The</strong> truthfulness is something that<br />

should be considered - intuitively - part of preconditions, but is not something that can be proved through<br />

experiences.<br />

What should we pay attention to when I -as a female philosopher- approach the issue of female North<br />

Korean defectors? First and foremost, I should make their voice heard and view the world from their per-<br />

spectives to reveal the multi-layered nature of conversation and then interpret their message so that South<br />

Korean people can understand what North Korean defectors really meant to say. <strong>The</strong>n, I should help them<br />

examine their low self-esteem and the chauvinistic value they internalized in order to build a better under-<br />

standing of democracy and the value of their bodies. However, it is not easy to help female North Korean<br />

defectors, who are used to living within the strong groupist values and control in North Korea, to under-<br />

stand autonomy and responsibilities and have interest and desire to develop and grow themselves. It is not<br />

easy for female North Korean defectors who face the harsh reality of trying to survive to take some time<br />

to reflect on their lives and thoughts. <strong>The</strong>y have to work every day to survive and thus might think self-<br />

examination and reflection are a luxury to them, which is the attitude that contributes in part to placing<br />

250


those women on the periphery of society. However, the efforts to understand culture can be made in their<br />

everyday lives as they get to meet with other people and having communication with others can contribute<br />

to boosting their self esteem. For female North Korean defectors who were entrapped in a closed circle<br />

without a way out, living in South Korean society is like solving an equation of higher degree. Only when<br />

the humanities are healed from the perspective of feminism will we be able to have power to heal the deep<br />

wounds inflicted on female North Korean defectors and provide them with support to solve the difficult<br />

equation of higher degree.<br />

References<br />

Kim Ae-Ryeong 2012, “Listening to Different Voice: Speaking Agent and Inaudible Anisotropism”,<br />

Korean Feminist Philosophy Issue 17, Korean Association of Female Philosophers, 2012.<br />

Kim Heisook 1999, “Culture, Language and Existence”, Philosophy Edition 61, Korean Association of<br />

Philosophy.<br />

Noh Gwi-Nam 2012, “Understanding North Korean Defectors and Anisotropism”, Korean Feminist<br />

Philosophy Issue 17, Korean Association of Female Philosophers.<br />

Choi Jin-Lee 2010, “<strong>The</strong> Issue of North Korean Women’s Human Rights and the Experiences of Imjingang<br />

Publishing in Solving the Issue”, I’m Reporting this Issue: Human Rights Infringement Against<br />

North Korean Women, hosted by Rep. Park Seon-Young, sponsored by the Alliance for Promoting<br />

Human Rights of North Korean Women, the 27th Policy Seminar (2010. 4. 28, Meeting Room in the<br />

Representative’s Office Building at the National Assembly) Documents.<br />

Choi Hyun-Shil 2012, “<strong>The</strong> Body of Women on the Korean Peninsula in the 20-21 Century”, Women’s<br />

Study Research Institute at Pusan National University, the Joint Seminar Booklet of Korean<br />

Association of Female Philosophers (2012. 5. 19).<br />

Hong Min, 2010 “<strong>The</strong> Human Rights Issues facing North Korean Women”, I’m Reporting this Issue:<br />

Human Rights Infringement Against North Korean Women, hosted by Rep. Park Seon-Young,<br />

sponsored by the Alliance for Promoting Human Rights of North Korean Women, the 27th Policy<br />

Seminar (2010. 4. 28, Meeting Room in the Representative’s Office Building at the National<br />

Assembly) Documents.<br />

Davidson, D. 1984, “Radical Interpretaion” Inquiries into Truth & Interpretation, Oxford: Clarendon Press.<br />

Harding, S. 1991, Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Ithaca: Cornell University Press.<br />

__________ 1993, “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology,” Feminist Epistemologies, New York: Routledge.<br />

__________ 1998, Is Science Multi-cultural? Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.<br />

Tanesini, A. 1999, Feminist Epistemologies, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.<br />

251<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

<strong>Humanities</strong> and the Crisis of Politics: from Kallipolis to Blade<br />

Runner’s L.A.<br />

Luca Maria Scarantino<br />

IULM University<br />

This paper addresses the idea of the “healing” power of the humanities – If any – in a way that focuses<br />

on their cultural and disciplinary autonomy rather than on externally defined agendas and sets of<br />

problems. On the one hand, it argues for an increased transdisciplinary approach within the humanities<br />

themselves as well as in relation to the social and natural sciences. On the other hand, it will show that<br />

the humanities, through their concepts and their critical function, are playing a role that goes far beyond<br />

the national scope where political governance historically belongs. <strong>The</strong> decreasing capacity of politics<br />

to rule the global changes of our world is often leading administrators to overlook the importance of the<br />

humanities; however, these disciplines play an essential role in opening human minds to an increasing<br />

cultural complexity. As such, they represent a major tool for cultural survival and coexistence in the<br />

global, intercultural space of present humanity.<br />

252


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Parallel Session 1-2<br />

Who Should Be Listened To?<br />

1. <strong>The</strong>rapeutic Function of the <strong>Humanities</strong>: Black Studies and the<br />

African American Experience<br />

/ Tunde Adeleke (Iowa State University)<br />

2. Solidarity of the Subaltern Confronting the Globalization of<br />

Suffering: A Transmodern Critique of Zygmunt Bauman’s Liquid<br />

Modernity<br />

/ Yong-gyu Kim (Pusan National University)<br />

3. Divorce Disputes, Property Right, and Legal Pluralism in a North<br />

China Village<br />

/ Zhao Xudong (Renmin University)<br />

4. Difficult Dialogues: Perpetrators, Victims, Power, and the<br />

Legacies of Mass Violence<br />

/ Henry C. <strong>The</strong>riault (Worcester State University)


<strong>The</strong>rapeutic Function of the <strong>Humanities</strong>: Black Studies and the<br />

African American Experience<br />

Tunde Adeleke<br />

Iowa State University<br />

<strong>The</strong> Black American experience embodied suffering at its worst. It was an experience birthed and nurtured<br />

in perhaps the most tragic and violent of human encounters. <strong>The</strong> enslavement of millions of Africans and<br />

their forcible transplantation to the New <strong>World</strong> which lasted for about three centuries unleashed a reign<br />

of terror, violence and dehumanization that had far-reaching and profound global consequences. Many<br />

contend today that black Americans still bear the scar of that suffering. Recalling his first encounter with<br />

his European captors as he was being loaded into the ship along with other bewildered and frightened<br />

slaves, eleven years old Olaudah Equiano wrote,<br />

the white people looked and acted, as I thought, in so savage a manner; for I had never seen among<br />

my people such instances of brutal cruelty….<strong>The</strong> shrieks of the women and the groans of the<br />

dying rendered the whole a scene of horror almost inconceivable…Every circumstance I met with<br />

served only to render my state more painful, and heighten my apprehensions and my opinion of the<br />

cruelty of the whites. 1<br />

<strong>The</strong> evil, fear and inhumane vibes European slave traders emitted foretold the greater horror and terror<br />

that awaited African captives in America. Equiano’s observation proved prophetic. <strong>The</strong> savagery he saw in<br />

the faces of those white slave traders mirrored the essence of what became the American South’s “Peculiar<br />

Institution”, and shaped the daily lives of slaves and experiences of generations of their descendants.<br />

Abject misery and dehumanization characterized slavery. 2 Imprisoned within this wall of degradation,<br />

1 Paul Edwards, ed., Equiano’ Travels: <strong>The</strong> Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano or Gustavus Vassa the African.<br />

Long Grove: Illinois, 1996, pp. 24-25.<br />

2 Kenneth Stampp, <strong>The</strong> Peculiar Institution: Slavery in the Ante-Bellum South. New York: Alfred Knopf, 1956. Eugene<br />

Genovese, Roll, Jordan Roll: <strong>The</strong> <strong>World</strong> the Slaveholders Made. New York: Pantheon, 1969.<br />

255<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

blacks had to device means of retaining a semblance of dignity and humanity. In other words, blacks were<br />

thrust into the most inhumane of environments which subverted and denied their humanity. As James<br />

Sidbury surmised;<br />

Over the course of the eighteenth century several factors, including the intensification of the<br />

Atlantic slave trade, the increasing economic and cultural integration of plantation America into<br />

European society, and the growing currency of Enlightenment notions of human progress, helped<br />

produce a conventional image of Africa in the Western imagination as a primitive and pagan place.<br />

‘Africans,’ according to this view, were a savage people who existed outside of the narrative of<br />

Western progress. 3<br />

<strong>The</strong> slave masters constructed a world of violence and brutalities. Within this world, slaves existed as<br />

beasts of burden. To justify slavery, slaveholders and their intellectual and pseudo-intellectual theoreticians<br />

from different disciplines including science, history, geography and theology developed a transmogrified<br />

portrait of Africa, and pontificated about the “darkness” and barbarism of the continent, and the inherent<br />

inferiority of Africans. 4 Notwithstanding this overwhelming force, blacks did not succumb or totally<br />

surrender to the dominant discourse of negation. Instead, slavery nurtured the seeds of its ultimate<br />

destruction. <strong>The</strong> brutalities and violence of slavery ignited in blacks a resistant and self-deterministic<br />

consciousness. Leading black nationalists of the time realized that the black struggle in America had to<br />

have as its component an intellectual arm, since much of the pains and anguish blacks experienced derived<br />

from intellectual falsehood. 5 In the second half of the eighteenth century, Equiano, Ignatius Sancho,<br />

Quobna Ottobah Cugano, Phyllis Wheatley, and many others struggled against the misery and debilitation<br />

of an imposed collective identity of negation “African”. <strong>The</strong>y humanized themselves by not only<br />

contesting negation, but also counterpoising an empowering identity of survival and personal affirmation.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y initiated a countervailing “discourse on African identity”; one that redefined Africa in positive and<br />

ennobling terms. 6 This counter-hegemonic and regenerative discourse would engage generations of black<br />

3 James Sidbury, Becoming African in America: Race and Nation in the Early Black Atlantic. Oxford: Oxford University<br />

Press, 2007, p. 6.<br />

4 Winthrop Jordan, White over Black: American Attitudes toward the Negro, 1550-1812. Chapel Hill: University of North<br />

Carolina Press, 1968. Idus Newby, ed., <strong>The</strong> Development of Segregationist Thought. Homewood, Ill: <strong>The</strong> Dorsey Press,<br />

1968. George Frederickson, Black Image in the White Mind: <strong>The</strong> Debate on Afro-American Character and Destiny, 1817-<br />

1914. New York: Harper & Row, 1971, also his, Racism: A Short History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,<br />

2002.<br />

5 John Ernest, Liberation Historiography: African American Writers and the Challenge of History, 1794-1861. Chapel Hill:<br />

University of North Carolina Press, 2004. Stephen Hall, A Faithful Account of the Race: African American Historical<br />

Writing in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2009.<br />

6 James Sidbury, Becoming African in America, Chs. 1-3.<br />

256


activists. In other words, challenging and deconstructing the dominant and dehumanizing worldview<br />

became a trans-generational endeavor among black Americans.<br />

<strong>The</strong> brutalities and terror that defined the daily operations of the “Peculiar Institution” are etched<br />

indelibly in the memories and memoirs of slaves and former slaves. Frederick Douglass recounted in<br />

horrifying details how slavery destroyed the humanity of slaves, and the depth of terror and anguish<br />

that defined daily lives on the plantations. In both his Narrative (1845), and Life and Times (1881),<br />

Douglass left vivid accounts of this historical pain for posterity. 7 David Walker addressed in similarly<br />

gut-wrenching details the violent and demeaning character of slavery in his epic Appeal (1829) to “my<br />

much afflicted by suffering brethren,” in which he identified slavery as “the source from which most of<br />

our miseries proceed.” 8 Walker declared his “full and unshaken conviction, that we, (colored people of<br />

these United States) are the most degraded, wretched, and abject set of beings that ever lived since the<br />

world began…” 9 Walker’s conclusions are corroborated in hundreds, if not thousands, of testimonies of<br />

former slaves compiled by the Works Progress Administration (WPA) in the 1930s, and in the narratives<br />

and autobiographies of countless other slaves. 10 One consistent theme in the narratives is the terror and<br />

bestiality that defined the institution of slavery. And it did not end with slavery. <strong>The</strong> theme of suffering<br />

was a continuum from slavery right through to the present. <strong>The</strong> violence of slavery was succeeded by<br />

an equally, if not more, dehumanizing post-slavery reign of terror encased within a pervasive Jim Crow<br />

culture which lasted through much of the second half of the 20 th century. During this period, the American<br />

landscape was littered with horrifying “human fruits.” Lynching; the spectacle of black bodies hanging<br />

from trees, the stench of burning flesh emanating from “human barbecues” polluted the nation. <strong>The</strong><br />

age of lynching (1880-1945) witnessed hundreds, if not thousands, of hangings and burning of blacks,<br />

occasioned by sadistic orgies and frenzies, oftentimes involving whole families, including children, who<br />

congregated in main streets and town squares to bask in the torture, mutilation and burnings of black<br />

humans. 11 Such was the American racial and cultural landscape which lasted from the late-nineteenth<br />

7 Frederick Douglass, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, Written by Himself. New York: Signet<br />

Classics, 1997 (originally published in 1845). Frederick Douglass, Life and Times of Frederick Douglass. New York:<br />

Bonanza Books, 1962 (originally published in 1881).<br />

8 David Walker, David Walker’s Appeal to the Colored Citizens of the <strong>World</strong> (revised edition). New York: Hill & Wang,<br />

1995, p. 1. (originally published in 1829).<br />

9 Ibid.<br />

10 John F. Bayliss, ed.,<br />

John F. Bayliss, ed., Black Slave Narratives: Life Under Slavery as Told by its Victims in America. London: Collier<br />

Books, 1976. Norman R. Yetman, ed., Voices From Slavery: 100 Authentic Slave Narratives (African-Americans). New<br />

York: Dover Publications, 1999. See also his, When I Was a Slave: Memories From the Slave Narrative Collections.<br />

New York: Dover Publications, 2002.<br />

11 Jerrold M. Packard,<br />

Jerrold M. Packard, American Nightmare: <strong>The</strong> History of Jim Crow. New York: St. Martins Griffin, 2002. C. Vann<br />

Woodward, <strong>The</strong> Strange Career of Jim Crow. 3 rd revised edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1974. Ralph Ginzburg,<br />

Hundred Years of Lynchings. Baltimore, MD: Black Classic Press, 1988. Joe H. Mitchell, 150 Years of Lynchings:<br />

257<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

century to the second half of the twentieth. Key episodes that gripped national attention included the<br />

lynching of fourteen-year old Emmett Till in Money, Mississippi in 1955; an episode that ignited the<br />

flames of the civil rights movement, and the 1996 lynching of James Byrd in Jasper Texas, described<br />

by many as the last reported lynching of a black person in America. James Byrd was tied to the back of<br />

a truck by three white supremacists and dragged through a three-mile gravel road, and was slowly and<br />

sadistically dismembered. At the end, nothing of him was left. Human flesh littered the gravel road. 12<br />

<strong>The</strong> terror Equiano saw in the faces of his captors became the reality that ruled what many characterize<br />

as the American house of bondage. From its inception the black American experience exemplified<br />

dehumanization. As Herbert Aptheker emphasized, from the beginning, blacks confronted the critical<br />

challenge, among many others, of claiming and affirming their humanity. This was the existential struggle<br />

to reclaim their humanity in a culture/environment, and within the context of an institution, built on a<br />

denial and negation of that humanity. 13 It was not just the slave laws and state constitutions that were used<br />

to foster the culture of violence and terror; it was also education, or more appropriately, dis-education;<br />

that is, the denial of access to learning and the systematic use of ignorance to perpetuate and legitimize<br />

a culture of dehumanization. During slavery, it was a crime in most states to teach slaves the alphabets.<br />

Slaves simply did not go to school. Thus, slavery thrived on a culture of ignorance that socialized its<br />

black victims to develop self-loathing and inferiority complex, reinforcing in them a consciousness of<br />

negation and nothingness. Blacks were told they had no history, culture or heritage worthy of pride; and<br />

that they came from an environment of barbarism, primitivism and darkness. <strong>The</strong> intellectual foundation<br />

of black negation; the alleged absence of civilization in, and caricaturing of, Africa; the construction of<br />

Africa as a ‘dark” continent occupied by backward and primitive people; justified the enslavement and<br />

subordination of blacks. <strong>The</strong> goal was to legitimize enslavement by portraying slavery as a civilizing and<br />

positive force, the violence and horror notwithstanding. Over time, as Samuel Dubois Cook rightly noted,<br />

blacks developed a “tragic conception” of self, identity, history and heritage. 14 Though blacks confronted<br />

a destructive and disempowering culture, they refused to accept its reality, and struggled to challenge and<br />

reverse it. However, blacks soon realized that in order to effectively affirm their humanity, to overcome<br />

America’s Bloody Record in the Press. Joe Mitchell, 2002. Stewart Tolnay & E.M. Beck, A Festival of Violence: An<br />

Analysis of Southern Lynchings, 1882-1930. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1992. Elliot Jaspin, Buried in the Bitter<br />

Waters: <strong>The</strong> Hidden History of Racial Cleansing in America. New York: Basic Books, 2008.<br />

12 Joyce King, Hate Crime: <strong>The</strong> Story of a Dragging in Jasper, Texas. New York: Anchor Books, 2002. Dina Temple-<br />

Raston, A Death in Texas: A Story of Race, Murder, and a Small Town’s Struggle for Redemption. New York: Henry Holt<br />

& Company, 2002. Stephen J. Whitefield, A Death in the Delta: <strong>The</strong> Story of Emmett Till. Baltimore, MD: <strong>The</strong> John’s<br />

Hopkins University Press, 1988.<br />

13 Herbert Aptheker, “Slave Resistance in the United States.” In Nathan I. Huggins, Martin Kilson and Daniel M. Fox, eds.,<br />

Key Issues in the Afro-American Experience, vol 1 to 1877. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1971, pp. 161-173.<br />

14 Samuel Dubois Cook, “A Tragic Conception of Negro History.” Journal of Negro History, 45, October, 1960.<br />

258


this culture of violence and suffering, to succeed in this existential struggle, they had to invoke not just<br />

physical responses such as escape, resistance and rebellion, but also epistemological. <strong>The</strong>y had to attack<br />

and destroy the intellectual edifice of violence, the very ideological rationale of slavery. 15<br />

Since slavery and racism nurtured in black Americans a negative consciousness which served to<br />

undermine and negate their humanity, leading blacks realized that overcoming this existential challenge<br />

required self-deterministic affirmation of the will and desire to survive. In essence, this meant the forceful<br />

affirmation of their humanity. However, since that humanity was negated by a culture of intellectual<br />

racism, its reclamation would require frontal assaults on the edifice of that culture. In other words,<br />

to claim and exercise their humanity, blacks must challenge the prevailing and dominant intellectual<br />

discourse of invisibility, negation and negativism that had defined their existence in dominant national<br />

historical narratives. <strong>The</strong>y had to reclaim for posterity, a noble, empowering and positive heritage and<br />

culture. Eighteenth century blacks such as Wheatley, Equiano, Sancho and Cugano developed positive<br />

counter-narratives of, and discourses on, the meaning of Africa. <strong>The</strong>y theorized a different Africa; a<br />

positive Africa which soon functioned as a collective identity for resisting Eurocentric ideas. 16 Building<br />

upon this foundation, early nineteenth century black leaders of different backgrounds and orientation<br />

launched the abolitionist movement. To challenge slavery, they had to vigorously contest and debunk false<br />

ideas about their history and heritage. <strong>The</strong>y had to challenge American culture of intellectual negation<br />

and hegemony. In the process, these “Pioneers in Protest”, as the late Earl Thorpe described them (James<br />

Pennington, William Wells Brown, William Cooper Neal, George Washington Williams, etc.), embarked<br />

on exposing the fallacies of American historical writings, and rescuing the black heritage and experience<br />

from its stranglehold by “researching” and publicizing the “truths” about American history and African<br />

heritage. <strong>The</strong>y strongly believed that illuminating and highlighting the “truths” about their African history<br />

and heritage would eradicate the fallacies that were used to justify their enslavement. 17 As Stephen Hall<br />

underscored, these early black intellectuals;<br />

understood the necessity of focusing their challenge on contemporary nineteenth-century<br />

contradictions of history that privileged the rise of the Western hemisphere as the starting point for<br />

American history. For the black writers, the rise of the West coincided with the development of the<br />

slave trade and the demise of Africa. To respond to these charges, black writers in more expansive<br />

ways…honed a well-crafted historical discourse that accentuated their complex role in human<br />

15 John Ernest, Liberation Historiography. Stephen Hall, A Faithful Account of the Race.<br />

16 James Sidbury, Becoming African in America.<br />

17 Earl Thorpe, Black Historians: A Critique. New York: William Morrow & Company, 1971.<br />

259<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

history […] 18<br />

<strong>The</strong>y were not just “troubling” the pages of the writings of historians who had misrepresented their<br />

history, but also they “worked consciously and aggressively to ‘present a just view’ of black origins.” 19<br />

For these pioneers, there was no better point of departure than the very continent that had become the<br />

subject of caricature and negation; the one maligned to justify denying to them their humanity—Africa.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y launched a gradual, systematic and determined efforts to research, study and publicize their African<br />

background and roots, to discover and publicize not just their rich history and culture, but also to affirm, in<br />

the process, their humanity and thus claim for themselves subject-status as agents and positive contributors<br />

to American development. David Walker discussed this issue in his Appeal. For Walker, as Stephen Hall<br />

argued;<br />

Rethinking the African American role in Western civilization required a systematic engagement<br />

with black achievements, ancient and modern. Walker turned to classical source to make an<br />

important point about the place of Africa in the history of the world: ‘When we take a retrospective<br />

view of the arts and sciences—the Pyramids and other magnificent buildings—the turning of the<br />

channel of the river Nile, by the sons of Africa or of Ham, among them learning originated and was<br />

carried thence into Greece, where it was improved upon and refined. 20<br />

In the referenced passage, Walker advanced a theme that would become a central canon of black<br />

intellectual protest; one that subsequent activists, including Martin Delany, would amplify—the antiquity<br />

of civilization in Africa, and Africa’s influence and impacts on Western civilization and culture. <strong>The</strong><br />

rescuing of African history from the depths of Eurocentric neglect and more significantly, the re-<br />

affirmation of Africa’s preeminence in world civilization became a recurrent theme in nineteenth century<br />

black intellectual activism. Delany built his nationalism on a strong foundation of African historical and<br />

cultural preeminence. 21<br />

Regardless of their intellectual imperfections, the writings and publications of the “Pioneers” laid the<br />

foundation for future generations and genres of black intellectual activism. <strong>The</strong>y wrote about their rich<br />

ancestry in Africa and their enslavement. <strong>The</strong>y repositioned Africa and blacks as active and positive<br />

18 Stephen Hall, A Faithful Account of the Race, p. 51.<br />

19 Ibid, p. . 52.<br />

52.<br />

20 Ibid, p. . 42.<br />

42.<br />

21 John Ernest, Liberation Historiography, Stephen hall, A Faithful Account of the Race. Tunde Adeleke, UnAfrican Americans:<br />

Nineteenth-Century Black Nationalists and the Civilizing Mission. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky,<br />

1998.<br />

260


agents in world civilization. Most significantly, they claimed a central role for blacks in American national<br />

history from the Revolution through the Civil War and beyond. In their collective narratives, black protest<br />

intellectuals insisted that American achievements could not be accounted for absent black contributions.<br />

Thus, there was a connection between the historic pains and sufferings of black Americans and the rise of<br />

an intellectual avante-guard. <strong>The</strong>ir humanity denied through intellectual deceits and fraudulent claims and<br />

assertions, blacks fought back and attempted to reclaim and reaffirm that humanity through the creation<br />

of an intellectual tradition that highlighted the essence and worth of Africa. <strong>The</strong> New Negro History<br />

Movement of the early twentieth century further solidified the foundation of Black history. Led by William<br />

E. B. Du Bois, Carter G. Woodson, Benjamin Brawley and many others, the “New Negro” intellectuals<br />

used their education, research and publications to solidify a foundation for, and gain respectability for,<br />

African History. <strong>The</strong>y created the institutional structures and intellectual resources that established Black<br />

History as a respectable mainstream discipline, and, in the process, they laid the foundation for the future<br />

of Black Studies. 22 <strong>The</strong>re was consequently a direct connection between the sufferings of black Americans<br />

and the emergence of an intellectual discipline: Black Studies.<br />

Black Studies emerged and institutionalized in the late 1960s out of the pains and anguish of the black<br />

struggle. Its roots are embedded in the riots, boycotts, protest marches, police brutalities and racist<br />

attacks of the civil rights movement. This context would transform Black Studies into not only a<br />

discipline that embodied the pains of black Americans, but the panacea for soothing, moderating and<br />

ultimately eradicating those hurts. This linkage between Black Studies and the black struggle, as this<br />

paper establishes, was birthed in the earlier attempts by eighteenth and nineteenth centuries back leaders<br />

and activists to use knowledge as a weapon of change; a means of challenging the dominant hegemonic<br />

narratives. From the beginning, therefore, the black struggle in America was about challenging and<br />

debunking a debilitating philosophy and worldview which entrapped blacks in a socio-economic,<br />

cultural and political “house of horror”; the Plantation. Thus, the black struggle was about overcoming<br />

and transcending this dehumanizing environment. This called for the creation of a countervailing,<br />

life-affirming intellectual heritage; a counter-hegemonic response to the dominant tradition, one that<br />

validated the black past, reversed centuries of deliberate and systematic mis-education, and functioned as<br />

a disciplinary intellectual frame for the black struggle. <strong>The</strong> civil rights movement brought this vision to<br />

fruition. <strong>The</strong> struggle was not just about civil and political rights. At its core, the civil rights movement<br />

was also about comforting and easing the historic pains that had become magnified in racial violence and<br />

brutalities. However, there was no consensus among civil rights activists on the course of action. While<br />

22 August Meier and Elliott Rudwick,<br />

August Meier and Elliott Rudwick, Black History and the Historical Profession, 1915-1980. Urbana: University of Illinois<br />

Press, 1986. Darlene Clark-Hine, ed., <strong>The</strong> State of Afro-American History: Past, Present, Future. Baton Rouge:<br />

Louisiana State University Press, 1986.<br />

261<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

mainstream leaders focused intensely on civil and political rights, student activists grew increasingly<br />

impatient with what they perceived as the slow pace of change. Determined to accelerate the pace, they<br />

embraced and adopted the radical “Black Power” philosophy which ultimately would direct the attention<br />

of the activists to college campuses. 23<br />

<strong>The</strong> “Black Power” activists of the Students’ Movement concluded that civil and political rights<br />

would be hollow accomplishments without education; and were convinced that real knowledge was<br />

inconceivable absent engaging and obliterating the legacies of mis-education that continues to torment<br />

blacks psychologically and emotionally; legacies that, in their judgment, the colleges embody and<br />

nurture. Put differently, the student activists considered black liberation meaningless without uprooting<br />

the Eurocentric pedagogy that shaped American education. <strong>The</strong> need for intellectual and psychological<br />

emancipation, therefore, redirected the attention of black activists to educational reforms. 24 <strong>The</strong>y sought<br />

education that would rid their minds and consciousness of ideas and ethos that had nurtured self-<br />

abnegating consciousness, ideas that had subverted black self-deterministic capacity, and induced self-<br />

hate and loathing. <strong>The</strong>se activists realized that centuries of slave violence and racism; of exploitation<br />

and impoverishment, of helplessness and powerlessness had resulted in a fatalistic disposition of self-<br />

hate and self-loathing. Black self-esteem and confidence had to be restored through education that taught<br />

blacks to appreciate their heritage, their culture; to appreciate their roles as active historical persona in the<br />

American drama. This would only happen, they insisted, if blacks had their own space within American<br />

higher education; a space within which to nurture and propagate those counter-narratives that would<br />

reshape black minds positively. <strong>The</strong>y began to advocate the creation of Black Studies; the foundation for<br />

which had already been solidified by earlier generations of activists. <strong>The</strong>ir efforts ultimately resulted in<br />

the establishment of the Black Studies Program at San Francisco State College in late 1968, popularly<br />

acclaimed as the first in the nation. This became the catalyst for programs at other institutions such as<br />

Princeton, Yale, Columbia, New York and Ohio State. 25<br />

Within the Black Studies purview, blacks hoped to validate their history and experiences. Black Studies<br />

would become the disciplinary arm of the black struggle. It would function as the intellectual means of<br />

redemption, as well as the tool with which to heal the pains that continue to torment blacks. Ridding<br />

23 Noliwe M. Rooks, White Money, Black Power: <strong>The</strong> Surprising History of African American Studies and the Crisis of<br />

Race in Higher Education. Boston: Beacon Press, 2006. Talmadge Anderson & James Stewart, Introduction to African<br />

American Studies, Trans-disciplinary Approaches and Implications. Baltimore, MD: Black Classic Press, 2007, Ch. 2.<br />

Fabio Rojas, From Black Power to Black Studies: How a Radical Social Movement Became an Academic Discipline.<br />

Baltimore, MD: <strong>The</strong> Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.<br />

24 Ibid.<br />

25 Ibid. See also, Fabio Rojas, From Black Power to Black Studies.<br />

262


lacks of the tragic worldview became crucial to survival. Black Power advocate Malcolm X, for<br />

example, offered knowledge of African history as anti-dote for self-destructive ideas and consciousness,<br />

the key to overcoming and obliterating the psychological and emotional pains inflicted on blacks through<br />

centuries of slavery and intellectual racism. 26 Thus, the institutionalization of Black Studies heralded a<br />

new approach to African history and culture. It offered blacks their own distinct racial/cultural lenses<br />

through which they perceived their African heritage and culture. It afforded blacks a positive view<br />

of themselves, as well as a renewed self-confidence that enhanced self-esteem and worth. Africa, the<br />

foundation of Black Studies became the source for a new positive identity; a new sense of the self, and<br />

the means of psychological and emotional freedom from the shackles of the past. Malcolm X and fellow<br />

Black Power spokesperson Stokely Carmichael saw increased knowledge of Africa as the means to a<br />

new self and identity. It was not just knowledge of Africa, but reeducation about Africa, about heritage<br />

and culture that would help blacks defeat and overcome Eurocentric mis-education. As the quest for<br />

intellectual emancipating and empowering knowledge became part of the civil rights movement, black<br />

activists and emerging intellectuals used Africa to construct a counter-hegemonic epistemology; an Africa-<br />

centered epistemology which became the intellectual bulwark against cultural emasculation and a weapon<br />

in what was perceived as an existential struggle against Eurocentrism. This “African-centered” philosophy<br />

(Afrocentricity) shaped the early Black Studies programs through the 1970s, and ultimately became a<br />

dominant disciplinary paradigm by the late 1980s.<br />

<strong>The</strong> “Black Consciousness and Community Orientation” concept developed by the “founding father”<br />

of Black Studies forged a problematic link between the discipline and the social and psychological<br />

challenges of the black community. 27 Also, perhaps unintentionally, it set the stage for the racialization<br />

of the discipline. <strong>The</strong> intension no doubt was to create a mutually reinforcing relationship between Black<br />

Studies and the black community, reflecting the social dynamics of the context of institutionalization.<br />

<strong>The</strong> objective was for Black Studies to cater to the needs of its primary community and constituency;<br />

one that had been abandoned by America and had suffered and continues to suffer the scourge of neglect.<br />

Blacks would have to be imbued with a sense of responsibility to use their knowledge to improve the<br />

black community. Unfortunately, this had the unintended consequence of further racializing the discipline.<br />

<strong>The</strong> injunction to merge the academy with the community implied the marriage of theory and praxis.<br />

This underlines the healing power of the discipline. Black Studies cannot just be about researching<br />

and publicizing the “truth” about black history and culture, neither should it focus solely on exposing<br />

the fallacies of Eurocentric/American history. However soothing and therapeutic the exposure of such<br />

fallacies, they (i.e., the fallacies) constitute just a dimension of a greater problem. <strong>The</strong> other critical<br />

26 Malcolm X, Malcolm X on Afro-American History, New Edition. New York: Pathfinder, 1990.<br />

27 Talmadge Anderson & James Stewart, Introduction to African American Studies, pp. 35-36.<br />

263<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

dimension, the praxis required black intellectuals to identify with, and use their knowledge to develop the<br />

neglected, powerless and helpless black community. This constitutes black intellectuals as avante-guard in<br />

the struggle to heal the deeper and larger wounds of the community. However noble this praxis function,<br />

ultimately it sets the stage for a ghetto-centric construction of Black Studies. 28 Emphasis on healing<br />

the historic pains and exposing the lies that had been used to inflict those pains and hurts undergird the<br />

problematic of intellectual credibility in Black Studies. Preoccupation with positively effecting black self-<br />

esteem has had far-reaching implications for what is taught in Black Studies, how it is taught, and by<br />

whom. <strong>The</strong>re developed almost a schizophrenic preoccupation with ensuring that what is taught, and how<br />

it is taught, conform strictly to the dictates of Afrocentrism. This suggests, therefore, that those deemed<br />

“alien” to the black experience, whether by virtue of race or ethnicity become suspect, regardless of<br />

disposition and qualification. 29<br />

<strong>The</strong> belief was that only the victims and those who directly or indirectly share in their anguish could be<br />

trusted to interpret and represent the experience accurately. <strong>The</strong> use of race and ethnicity to determine<br />

qualification, competence and authenticity within Black Studies reinforced a siege/fortress mentality which<br />

further compromised intellectual credibility. <strong>The</strong> case against whites teaching Black Studies, according<br />

to one Afrocentric scholar, is fundamentally because they would “be reporting on it and interpreting<br />

it through the prism of their European experience (when what is needed is) an authentic presentation<br />

of the (black) experience.” 30 Another critic is opposed to whites teaching Black Studies because “their<br />

historic experiences disqualify them.” In his words, “discrimination can best be taught and understood<br />

by those who experience it. It is hard to read a textbook and understand what discrimination is about. It<br />

is a different thing altogether to live it.” 31 Asante is equally skeptical of whites teaching Black Studies.<br />

However, he concedes that it is possible for whites to teach Black Studies if such a person is “willing to<br />

make the necessary commitment to teach accurately and Afrocentrically” (emphasis mine), and has “the<br />

ability to frame blacks as historical agents.” 32 Such white professors must demonstrate not just knowledge<br />

of, but also “sensitivity to the genetic, social, and cultural links between Africa and Europe.” He insists on<br />

a priori vetting their “intellectual location, social orientation and moral investment.” 33<br />

Almost from the start, Black Studies assumed an ideological burden which would have far-reaching<br />

28 Tunde Adeleke, “Enduring Crises and Challenges of African American Studies.” Journal of Thought, vol. 32, number 3,<br />

Fall 1997, pp. 65-96.<br />

29 Ibid.<br />

30 Ibid., ., , p. p. . 73.<br />

73.<br />

31 Ibid.<br />

32 Molefi Asante, “Where is the White Professor Located” Located” Perspectives, vol. 31, number 6, September 1993, p. 19.<br />

33 Ibid.<br />

264


implications for scholarship. <strong>The</strong> ideological context of institutionalization created a racialized essentialist<br />

identity for Black Studies. It quickly became, in the perception of many, a discipline created by, and for,<br />

blacks. This racialization reflected the historical context. But there were also other considerations. Those<br />

who taught and administered the program in its early years were mostly black activists whose credentials/<br />

qualifications derived largely from the fact of “being black” and the ability to claim affinity with, or<br />

having actively participated in, the black struggles. Academic qualification was simply not a priority.<br />

However, this would change as the field grew and expanded with the training of more professionals.<br />

Nonetheless, for over two decades after its inception, racial/cultural jurisdiction and credentialism shaped<br />

Black Studies. Whether by design or not, several of the early programs and departments were run by all-<br />

black faculty. <strong>The</strong>re seemed to pervade an unwritten, racialized intellectual code; one that mandated an<br />

all-black faculty for Black Studies. <strong>The</strong> few whites who ventured into the field had difficulty gaining<br />

acceptance and credibility. Regardless of qualification, they were suspect. Race and ethnicity became the<br />

overriding credentials, and “experience”, rather than academic qualification, was much valued. 34 Thus,<br />

“being black” was presumed to confer to authenticity in Black Studies. <strong>The</strong>re was an underlying fear and<br />

concern that whites could not be trusted to teach with the same conviction and passion as blacks; they<br />

simply could not be trusted to “tell it as it should be told.” This was premised on the belief that because of<br />

the centuries of Eurocentric mis-education, for Black Studies to be truly emancipated, it had to be rooted<br />

in Africa; it had to be truly a discipline by, for and about blacks/Africans. This racialized ethos defined the<br />

Afrocentric essentialist paradigm which assumed dominance from the late 1980s through the early 1990s.<br />

Adopted by leading Black Studies programs and departments, Afrocentrism became not just a defining<br />

paradigm for the field, but functioned as well as an ideological panacea for easing and eradicating the<br />

psychological and emotional pains blacks had experienced, and continue to experience, from Eurocentric<br />

mis-education. 35<br />

Thus, Black Studies developed a paradigm which fundamentally racialized the discipline. Race became<br />

the basis of legitimacy and authenticity. Advocates insisted that the field had to be constructed and<br />

taught “Afrocentrically” for it to truly accomplish its mission; otherwise it would just be another variant<br />

of Eurocentrism. Essentially, Afrocentrism locates Black Studies strictly and wholly within African<br />

34 Tunde Adeleke, “Enduring Crises and Challenges,” also Robert Blackey and Howard Shorr, eds., (Teaching Innovations<br />

Tunde Adeleke, “Enduring Crises and Challenges,” also Robert Blackey and Howard Shorr, eds., (Teaching Innovations<br />

<strong>Forum</strong>) “White Professors, Black History: Foray into the Multicultural Classroom.” Perspectives, vol. 31, number 6,<br />

September 1993, pp. 6-19.<br />

35 Molefi Asante, “<strong>The</strong> Afrocentric Idea in Education,”<br />

Molefi Asante, “<strong>The</strong> Afrocentric Idea in Education,” Journal of Negro Education, vol. 60, number 2, 1991, pp. 170-<br />

179. See also his, <strong>The</strong> Afrocentric Idea. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1987; Afrocentricity. Trenton, NJ: Africa<br />

<strong>World</strong> Press, 1988; Kemet, Afrocentricity and Knowledge. Trenton, NJ: Africa <strong>World</strong> Press, 1990; “On Historical Interpretation.”<br />

In his Malcolm X as Cultural Hero and other Afrocentric Essays. Trenton, NJ: Africa <strong>World</strong> Press, 1993.<br />

Tunde Adeleke, “Black Studies, Afrocentricity and Scholarship: A Reconsideration.” Griot: Journal of African American<br />

Studies, Vol. 12, number 1, Spring 1993.<br />

265<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

cosmology; reframing in the most positive sense, the history, culture and accomplishments of African<br />

civilizations, and the systematic use of the knowledge gained to empower blacks in their struggles. 36<br />

<strong>The</strong> injunction to teach “Afrocentrically”, therefore, suggests a willingness to affirm and validate Africa/<br />

Blacks; to research and teach Black Studies strictly from an African perspective. This calls for forcefully<br />

critiquing and denouncing Eurocentric education, especially in regards to its negative impacts and<br />

enduring legacies. Most importantly, teaching “Afrocentrically” implies the instrumentalist combination<br />

of knowledge creation and dissemination with social engineering. This entails the therapeutic use of<br />

Black Studies to deal with and eradicate those negative, demeaning and self-loathing ideas that shaped<br />

black consciousness for centuries. In other words, the role of the instructor is not just to teach, but also<br />

ideological; to use Africa to empower students by challenging and reversing legacies of destructive and<br />

negative socialization. Due to paradigmatic imperative, Black Studies combined both academic and non-<br />

academic (instrumentalist) functions. It became a discipline for addressing not just the emotional and<br />

psychological pains, but also for eradicating the ills of the black community.<br />

<strong>The</strong> adoption of a racialized and ethnicized paradigm for Black Studies is intellectually problematic,<br />

especially in the context of emerging perspectives in the humanities and social sciences which privilege<br />

interdisciplinary and cross-cultural scholarship and discourses. As humans become citizens of emerging<br />

“global village”, and gravitate toward cultural citizenship, race and ethnicity become anachronistic as<br />

identitarian constructs and intellectual anchors. Put differently, just as the nation-state loses its grips on,<br />

and monopoly of, identity, so do race and ethnicity. <strong>The</strong> challenge for Black Studies scholars and scholars<br />

in the humanities generally is how to embrace this globalizing perspective without being constrained by<br />

the “Afrocentric” or any primordial identitarian ideology. <strong>The</strong> global and globalizing character of the<br />

black experience problematizes the use of race, ethnicity, or even culture, as paradigmatic frame for Black<br />

Studies. <strong>The</strong> ability to engage, validate and affirm multiple and complex experiences is at the core of the<br />

humanities. We live in a mutually reinforcing, mutually reflective universe defined by crosscurrents of<br />

influences and values. No credible humanities discipline can exist in isolation, driven solely by racially<br />

defined experiential ethos. It is important to clearly demarcate between an intellectual discipline and an<br />

ideological movement, each is characterized by fundamentally different objectives. While there may<br />

be shared and overlapping interests, the goals are fundamentally different. Black Studies cannot be<br />

constructed instrumentally and “Afrocentrically” and at the same time retain intellectual credibility. <strong>The</strong><br />

Afrocentric paradigm is racially and culturally constricting. For intellectual credibility, the discipline has<br />

to be shared. This means not only that the field is open to everyone, but also that its philosophical frame<br />

privileges critical discourses with others; that it is an intellectual stream from which everyone is free to<br />

36 Ibid.<br />

266


drink, an embodiment of experiences that are not enclosed in, or delineated by, racial, ethnic or cultural<br />

walls.<br />

<strong>The</strong> sufferings of black Americans cannot effectively be relieved by a discipline grounded in the<br />

philosophy of pain; one which isolates blacks behind a cultural and racial boundary that discourages<br />

engaging other experiences. A paradigm rooted and grounded in pain would not foster interdisciplinary<br />

and inter-cultural researches and discourses. It would replicate an epistemology of pain that feeds the<br />

consciousness with negative and inhibiting recollections which hinder critical engagement with others.<br />

Pains are better relieved by experiences that inculcate in the victims the understanding that, however<br />

real, the pains do not, and should not, define one’s essence. In fact, it is in seeing how much blacks share<br />

with others, even the historic counter-hegemonic “other” that those pains are better analyzed, understood,<br />

and their effects relieved. An intellectual paradigm rooted in pain and defined by counter-narratives of<br />

negation, one which seeks to demonize and delegitimize the “other”, only replicates the very problem<br />

it was designed to eradicate, by evolving into what fundamentally is a disciplinary “ethnoscape” (to<br />

borrow Appadurai’s concept). 37 <strong>The</strong> pain is not relieved, but encased and perpetuated. Thus, Afrocentric<br />

fixation on race and identity politics negatively frames Black Studies as a protest discipline, a discipline<br />

fixated on shaping and re-shaping identity, constantly and perpetually on guard against perceived threats<br />

from the dominant society. As Gerald Early rightly noted, the entire Black Studies “enterprise seems<br />

more about authentication and restoration of identity than anything else.” This entraps the discipline “in<br />

a conceptual bind” which institutes the very problem it was created to destroy—“the act of imposing a<br />

unified identity upon a huge population of disparate people.” 38 <strong>The</strong>re is also what Early characterized as “the<br />

political baggage” of the origins of Black Studies. This “baggage” compelled the imposition of a uniform<br />

identity upon a people without consideration for the wealth and complexities of their backgrounds and<br />

experiences. 39 As Early underscored, the “anti-establishment” origins of Black Studies created a “political<br />

baggage” which encouraged “dogmatic teaching, the quest for Afrocentric orthodoxy, and a pure African<br />

perspective of the world.” 40 <strong>The</strong> result is a cynical, anti-intellectual disposition that views with suspicion<br />

established canons of intellectual respectability. This is reflected in “the postmodernists denunciation of<br />

objectivity as Eurocentric, producing a vacuum that can be filled only by “correct” leftist or nationalist<br />

37 Arjun Appadurai, “Disjuncture and and Difference in a Global Cultural Economy.” In Mike Featherstone, ed., Global Culture:<br />

Nationalism, Globalization, and Modernity. London: Sage, 1990, pp. 297.<br />

38 Gerald Early, “A Place of Our Own.” <strong>The</strong> New York Times (on the web), April 14, 2002, p. 2.<br />

39 Stephen Howe, Afrocentrism: Mythical Pasts and Imagined Homes. London: Verso, 1998. Clarence E. Walker, We Can’t<br />

Go Home Again: An Argument about Afrocentrism. London: Oxford University Press, 2001. Yaacov Shavit History in<br />

Black: Afro-Americans in Search of an Ancient Past. London: Frank Cass, 2001. Tunde Adeleke, <strong>The</strong> Case Against Afrocentrism.<br />

Jackson, MS: University Press of Mississippi, 2009.<br />

40 Gerald Early, “ “A Place of Our Own”, p. 3.<br />

267<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

politics.” 41 <strong>The</strong>re is also “the racial demarcation of the curriculum” which, according to Early, has “worked<br />

against the best interests of both the black professor and the black students by defeating a fundamental<br />

purpose of a liberal education: to learn about and to become experts in experiences outside yourself.” 42<br />

Further isolating Black Studies and thus eroding its intellectual credibility is the “Afrocentric” distrust<br />

of, and reluctance to embrace, mainstream education. Afrocentric scholars deem mainstream education<br />

inherently harmful to blacks. 43 Under the guise of scientific objectivity, rationalism and universalism,<br />

mainstream institutions function as conduits of Eurocentric hegemonic values. Rejecting rationalism,<br />

empiricism and objectivity, Afrocentric scholars advance relativism, and the construction of Black Studies<br />

within a racialized essentialist perspective rooted in, and one that positively reflected, the African world. 44<br />

This became the weapon of liberation, conceived dualistically and simultaneously to include academic<br />

and ideological dimensions. This racial essentialist epistemology became, for leading Afrocentric<br />

scholars, such as Molefi Asante, Amos Wilson, John Henrik Clarke, Marimba Ani, Maulana Karenga,<br />

Terry Kershaw and Na’im Akbar, the one and only viable and credible perspective for Black Studies<br />

and for educating blacks. Afrocentrism also functions as a kind of “collective consciousness” paradigm<br />

that uses racially and culturally shared negative experiences to shape in blacks an awareness of their<br />

collective pains. This shared awareness would supposedly inspire self-determination. This heightened<br />

state of “intellectual vigilance” which informs the Afrocentric paradigm shapes Black Studies in ways<br />

that conforms strictly to the goals of black liberation; the need to combat and deconstruct vestiges of<br />

Eurocentric education and socializing. 45 It is this construction of Black Studies that validates the racial<br />

credentialist problematic which delegitimizes anyone or interpretation not in conformity with Afrocentric<br />

view of history and reality; or anyone deemed racially and culturally “alien” to the unique experiences of<br />

the race. In other words, suffering, or the ability to claim a heritage of suffering, became a credentialing<br />

and legitimizing criteria and consideration. It soon became the defining and unifying underpinning of the<br />

essentialist pedagogy. Shrinkages in opportunity, coupled with renewed and relentless onslaughts on civil<br />

rights, and upsurge of ultraconservatism that targets social welfare reforms have exacerbated the crises of<br />

the black communities (poverty, unemployment, etc.) and bolstered the Afrocentric appeal as a weapon of<br />

liberation rather an intellectual paradigm. Oba T’Shaka urged continued adoption of Afrocentrism because<br />

41 Ibid.<br />

42 Ibid.<br />

43 Carter G. Woodson, <strong>The</strong> Mis-education of the Negro. Trenton, NJ: Africa <strong>World</strong> Press, 1990 (originally published in<br />

1933). Mwalimu J. Shujaa, ed., Too Much Schooling, Too Little Education: A Paradox of Black Life In White Societies.<br />

Trenton, NJ: Africa <strong>World</strong> Press, 1994.<br />

44 Molefi Asante, Afrocentricity, pp 50-52. Terry Kershaw, “<strong>The</strong> Emerging Paradigm in Black Studies.” in Talmadge Anderson,<br />

ed., Black Studies: <strong>The</strong>ory, Method, and Cultural Perspectives. Pullman: Washington State University Press,<br />

1990, pp. 17-24.<br />

45 Molefi Asante, Afrocentricity, Ch. 3.<br />

268


“black communities are in crises…we have become infested by the western worldview.” 46 Amos Wilson<br />

presented Afrocentrism as the means of redressing historical wounds inflicted upon blacks, physical,<br />

psychological and emotional. He saw no more effective weapon of dealing with the myriad of challenges<br />

confronting blacks in America than to invoke and unfurl their “Afrikan” identity and heritage. 47<br />

How realistic is a racialized essentialist framing of Black Studies in the context of globalization and<br />

growing emphasis on connectivity and inter-disciplinary scholarship in the humanities? Can the<br />

humanities combine academic and extra-academic functions, especially if the latter are race-specific and<br />

culturally provincial, in a context, and in an intellectual milieu that privileges inter-disciplinary scholarship<br />

and discourses; one in which culture and identity fluctuate, and old cultural and ethnic boundaries<br />

become obsolete? Black Studies could conceivably assume extra-academic functions of therapeutic<br />

and instrumentalist nature due to the circumstance of its origin. <strong>The</strong> problem occurs, if and when, such<br />

functions become the essence of the discipline. For Black Studies to embrace and reflect emerging<br />

perspectives in the humanities, the discipline has to disengage from, or at the very least deemphasize,<br />

cultural and racial instrumentalism. Black Studies scholars, like others in the humanities must engage other<br />

experiences freely, and black students must expect exposure to a wide range of complex perspectives.<br />

<strong>The</strong> future of Black Studies depends on this openness and flexibility. <strong>The</strong> paradigm should acknowledge,<br />

affirm and validate the human experiences in their richness and diversity. Black Studies should not<br />

replicate racialized or culturally hegemonic grand paradigms or perspectives that shaped the context of the<br />

black experience; perspectives that were used to delegitimize “others” while being falsely represented as<br />

“universal’ and “objective.” As indicated above, Afrocentrism developed largely in response to what was<br />

perceived as the prevailing tendency to exalt as “universal” and “objective”, canons rooted in Eurocentric<br />

weltanschauung. Consequently, blacks felt that their heritage and contributions were neglected; and their<br />

values and cultures caricatured and delegitimized. Everything was conflated into a supposedly universal<br />

and objective worldview; a framework, in the judgment of Afrocentric scholars, for European hegemony.<br />

Afrocentrism was meant to free and protect blacks from this bondage, while also disrupting the legacies of<br />

their historic hurts.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Afrocentric construction of Black Studies, therefore, reflects a rejection of post-modern emphasis<br />

on inter-disciplinary discourses. <strong>The</strong>re is clearly a reluctance to embrace post-modern or post-colonial<br />

assumptions, especially with respect to notions of globalism, connectivity and inter-culturalism. Suffering<br />

remains at the core of the problem. <strong>The</strong> critical question is: in what ways, if any, is the black American<br />

46 Oba T’shaka,<br />

Oba T’shaka, <strong>The</strong> Art of Leadership. Richmond, CA: Pan African Publications, 1990, p. 71.<br />

47 Amos Wilson,<br />

Amos Wilson, <strong>The</strong> Falsification of Afrikan Consciousness: Eurocentric History, Psychiatry and the Politics of White Supremacy.<br />

New York: Afrikan <strong>World</strong> InforSystems, 1993.<br />

269<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

condition (poverty, racism, inequality, etc) moderated or mediated by post-modern or post-colonial<br />

developments? In other words, are the sufferings moderated by changing circumstances? Does the<br />

post-setting, however it is conceived (modern or colonial) necessarily safeguard, protect and preserve<br />

untrammeled, black rights and privileges? Does it preserve the fruits of their historic struggles? Indications<br />

are not reassuring. <strong>The</strong> upsurge of ultra-conservative attacks on social welfare reforms and public policies<br />

perceived to disproportionately impact the poor have only reinforced a sense of unease among black<br />

Americans. More recently, persistent attacks on civil rights culture, and blatant attempts in Republican<br />

controlled states to roll back the Voting Rights Act (1965), by restricting voting opportunities of minorities<br />

have only opened old wounds and reinforced the feeling that though the physical violence and sufferings<br />

of the past may have subsided, the political and cultural contexts remain pregnant with ominous<br />

consequences. Thus, for blacks, talks about trans-nationalism and cultural citizenship ring hollow. <strong>The</strong><br />

enduring legacy of suffering and the looming threat of an unrepentant ultra-conservatism underscore<br />

the relevance of cultural vigilance and racialized worldview. We may live in a postcolonial world;<br />

the “colonial” is still very much alive for black Americans. Even in the postcolonial and transnational<br />

contexts, the violence, pain and anguish of the “colonial” establishment remain raw and fresh for black<br />

Americans, perhaps because for them, the concept “postcolonial” remains a distant illusion. <strong>The</strong> “colonial<br />

era” is still very much extant. Perhaps a “postcolonial” America, if and when it comes, would result in the<br />

easing of black sufferings. Contrary to some expectations, even the election of the first Black President<br />

has not ushered in the “post-racial”; a critical subtext to the “postcolonial”. In fact, as many now argue,<br />

the election of Barack Obama has, more than at any other time in American history further deepened the<br />

racial divide and animosity. It has revealed how distant the nation is from the “postcolonial” or “post-racial”<br />

termini.<br />

Afrocentric scholars, therefore, deem the trans-national vision an illusion. It is difficult to envisage any<br />

transcending, be it racial, ethnic or cultural in a global environment which continues in some form or other<br />

to replicate privileges; where racial inequities and inequality prevail. Hence, Afrocentrists who subscribe<br />

dogmatically to a conflict-driven perception of reality remain skeptical. <strong>The</strong>y deem transcending of any<br />

sort a ruse; the “trans” a higher level of the old hegemonic order, an elevated platform for Eurocentric<br />

domination and exploitation, and thus an expanded terrain of black sufferings. Hence, they are leery<br />

of international/global engagements. 48 For them, black sufferings cry out for global attention. Blacks<br />

continue to languish beneath the veneer of American democracy. <strong>The</strong>ir sufferings have morphed and<br />

48 Molefi Asante,<br />

Molefi Asante, <strong>The</strong> Painful Demise of Eurocentrism: An Afrocentric Response to Critics. Trenton, NJ: Africa <strong>World</strong><br />

Press, 1990; Preface & chapt1. Marimba Ani, YURUGU: An African-Centered Critique of European Cultural Thought<br />

and Behavior. Trenton, NJ: Africa <strong>World</strong> Press, 1994. Haki Madhubuti, Enemies: <strong>The</strong> Clash of Races. Chicago: Third<br />

<strong>World</strong> Press, 1978.<br />

270


emanate from complex and often subtle sources—judicial, social, political and economic inequality<br />

and inequities, institutional and color-blind racism, and an unrepentant and virulent ultra-conservatism.<br />

This reality underscores, for many, the ever-present need for a distinct racialized pedagogy of resistance,<br />

an intellectual safety-valve, an “ethnoscape” even in an age when humans are supposedly increasingly<br />

being drawn closer, and traditional boundaries of racial, cultural and ethnic delineations deemphasized.<br />

In their judgment, blacks have yet to attain this noble “utopian” reality. Thus, Black Studies, a humanities<br />

discipline would remain saddled with this essentialist counter-hegemonic paradigm of “Pain”, even as<br />

humanities scholars worldwide explore ways of dismantling rigid disciplinary boundaries.<br />

References<br />

Adeleke, Tunde. “Black Studies, Afrocentricity and Scholarship: A Reconsideration.” Griot: Journal of<br />

African American Studies, vol. 12, number 2, Spring 1993.<br />

__________. “Enduring Crises and Challenges of African American Studies.” <strong>The</strong> Journal of Thought,<br />

vol. 32, number 3, Fall 1997.<br />

__________. UnAfrican Americans: Nineteenth Century Black Nationalists and the Civilizing Mission.<br />

Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky, 1998.<br />

__________. <strong>The</strong> Case Against Afrocentrism. Jackson, MS: University Press of Mississippi, 2009.<br />

Anderson, Talmadge and James Stewart, Introduction to African American Studies: Trans-disciplinary<br />

Approaches and Implications. Baltimore, MD: Black Classic Press, 2007.<br />

Ani, Marimba: YURUGU: An African-Centered Critique of European Cultural Thought and Behavior.<br />

Trenton, NJ: Africa <strong>World</strong> Press, 1994.<br />

Appadurai, Arjun. “Disjuncture and Difference in a Global Cultural Economy.” Mike Featherstone, ed.,<br />

Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalization, and Modernity. London: Sage, 1990.<br />

Aptheker, Herbert. “Slave Resistance in the United States.” Nathan Huggins, Martin Kilson and Daniel<br />

M. Fox, eds., Key Issues in the African American Experience, vol. 1 to 1877. New York: Harcourt<br />

Brace, 1971.<br />

Asante, Molefi K. <strong>The</strong> Afrocentric Idea. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1987.<br />

__________. Afrocentricity. Trenton, NJ: Africa <strong>World</strong> Press, 1988.<br />

__________. Kemet, Afrocentricity and Knowledge. Trenton, NJ: Africa <strong>World</strong> Press, 1990.<br />

__________. “<strong>The</strong> Afrocentric Idea in Education.” Journal of Negro Education, vol. 60, number 2, 1991.<br />

__________. “On Historical Interpretation.” Malcolm X as Cultural Hero and other Afrocentric Essays.<br />

Trenton, NJ: Africa <strong>World</strong> Press, 1993.<br />

__________. “Where is the White Professor Located?” Perspectives, vol. 31, number 6, September, 1993.<br />

__________. <strong>The</strong> Painful Demise of Eurocentrism: An Afrocentric Response to Critics. Trenton, NJ:<br />

Africa <strong>World</strong> Press, 1990.<br />

271<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Bayliss, John, ed., Black Slave Narratives: Life under Slavery as Told by its Victims in America. London:<br />

Collier Books, 1976.<br />

Blackey, Robert and Howard Shorr, eds., “White Professors, Black History: Foray into the Multicultural<br />

Classroom.” Perspectives, vol. 31, number 6, September 1993.<br />

Clark-Hine, Darlene, ed., <strong>The</strong> State of Afro-American History: Past, Present, Future. Baton, Rouge:<br />

Louisiana State University Press, 1986.<br />

Cook, Samuel Dubois. “A Tragic Conception of Negro History.” Journal of Negro History, 45, October,<br />

1960.<br />

Douglass, Frederick. Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, Written by Himself.<br />

New York: Signet Classics, 1997 (originally published, 1845).<br />

__________. Life and Times of Frederick Douglass. New York: Bonanza Books, 1962 (originally<br />

published in 1881).<br />

Early, Gerald. “A Place of Our Own.” New York Times (on the web), April 14, 2002.<br />

Edwards, Paul ed., Equiano’s Travels: <strong>The</strong> Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano or<br />

Gustavus Vassa, the African. Long Grove: Illinois, 1996.<br />

Ernest, John. Liberation Historiography: African American Writers and the Challenge of History, 1794-<br />

1861. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004.<br />

Frederickson, George. Black Image in the White Mind: <strong>The</strong> Debate on Afro-American Character and<br />

Destiny, 1817-1914. New York: Harper & Row, 1971.<br />

__________. Racism: A Short History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.<br />

Genovese, Eugene. Roll, Jordan Roll: <strong>The</strong> <strong>World</strong> the Slaveholders Made. New York: Pantheon, 1969.<br />

Ginzburg, Ralph. Hundred Years of Lynchings. Baltimore: Black Classic Press, 1988.<br />

Hall, Stephen. A faithful Account of the Race: African-American Historical Writing in Nineteenth-Century<br />

America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2009.<br />

Howe, Stephen. Afrocentrism: Mythical Pasts and Imagined Homes. London: Verso, 1998.<br />

Jaspin, Elliot. Buried in the Bitter Waters; <strong>The</strong> Hidden History of Racial Cleansing in America. New York:<br />

Basic Books, 2008.<br />

Jordan, Winthrop. White over Black: American Attitudes toward the Negro, 1550-1812. Chapel Hill:<br />

University of North Carolina press, 1968.<br />

Kershaw, terry, “<strong>The</strong> Emerging Paradigm in Black Studies.” Talmadge Anderson, ed., Black Studies:<br />

<strong>The</strong>ory, Method, and Cultural Perspectives. Pullman, WA: Washington State University Press.<br />

King, Joyce. Hate Crime: <strong>The</strong> Story of a Dragging in Jasper, Texas. New York: Archor Books, 2002.<br />

Malcolm X. Malcolm X on Afro-American History. New York: Pathfinder, 1990.<br />

Meier, August and Elliot Rudwick, Black History and the Historical Profession, 1915-1980. Urbana:<br />

University of Illinois Press, 1986.<br />

Mitchell, Joe. 150 Years of Lynchings: America’s Bloody Record in the Press. Joe Mitchell, 2002.<br />

272


Newby, Idus, ed., <strong>The</strong> Development of Segregationist thought. Homewood, ILL: <strong>The</strong> Dorsey Press, 1968.<br />

Packard, Jerrold. American Nightmare: <strong>The</strong> History of Jim Crow. New York: St. Martins Griffin, 2002.<br />

Rojas, Fabio. From Black Power to Black Studies: How a Radical Social Movement Became an Academic<br />

Discipline. Baltimore: <strong>The</strong> Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.<br />

Rooks, Noliwe. White Money, Black Power: <strong>The</strong> Surprising History of African-American Studies and the<br />

Crisis of Race in Higher Education. Boston: beacon press, 2006.<br />

Shavit, Yaacov. History in Black: Afro-Americans in Search of an Ancient Past. London: Frank Cass,<br />

2001.<br />

Shujaa, Mwalimu, ed., Too Much Schooling, Too Little Education: A Paradox of Black Life in White<br />

Societies. Trenton, NJ: Africa <strong>World</strong> Press, 1994.<br />

Sidbury, James. Becoming African in America: Race and Nation in the Early Black Atlantic. Oxford:<br />

Oxford University Press, 2007.<br />

Stampp, Kenneth. <strong>The</strong> Peculiar Institution: Slavery in the Ante-Bellum South. New York: Alfred Knopf,<br />

1956.<br />

Temple-Raston, Dina. A Death in Texas: A Story of Race, Murder, and a Small Town’s Struggle for<br />

Redemption. New York: Henry Holt & Co., 2002.<br />

Thorpe, Earl. Black Historians: a Critique. New York: William Morrow & Co., 1971.<br />

Tolnay, Stewart & E.M. Beck. A Festival of Violence: An Analysis of Southern Lynchings, 1882-1930.<br />

Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1992.<br />

T’shaka, Oba. <strong>The</strong> Art of Leadership. Richmond, CA: Pan African Publications, 1990.<br />

Walker, Clarence. We Can’t Go Home Again: An argument about Afrocentrism. London: Oxford<br />

University Press, 2001.<br />

Walker, David. David Walker’s Appeal to the Colored Citizens of the <strong>World</strong>. New York: Hill & Wang,<br />

1995 (originally published, 1829).<br />

Whitefield, Stephen. A Death in the Delta: <strong>The</strong> Story of Emmett Till. Baltimore: <strong>The</strong> Johns Hopkins<br />

University Press, 1988.<br />

Wilson, Amos. <strong>The</strong> Falsification of Afrikan Consciousness: Eurocentric History, Psychiatry and the<br />

Politics of White Supremacy. New York: Afrikan <strong>World</strong> InfoSystems, 1993.<br />

Woodson, Carter G. <strong>The</strong> Mis-education of the Negro. Trenton, NJ: Africa <strong>World</strong> Press, 1990 (originally<br />

published, 1933).<br />

Woodward, C. Vann. <strong>The</strong> Strange Career of Jim Crow. New York: Oxford University Press, 1974.<br />

Yetman, Norman R. ed., Voices from Slavery: 100 Authentic Slave Narratives (African-Americans). New<br />

York: Dover Publications, 1999.<br />

273<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Solidarity of the Subaltern Confronting the Globalization of Suffering:<br />

A Transmodern Critique of Zygmunt Bauman’s Liquid Modernity<br />

Yong-gyu Kim<br />

Pusan National University<br />

<strong>The</strong> Incident of Ssangyong Motor Company and the Globalization of Suffering<br />

Last summer, Slovenian thinker Slavoj Zizek made a sensational visit to the incense altar installed in<br />

front of Daean Gate, Deoksu Palace, during his trip to Korea. <strong>The</strong> altar was set up to commemorate a<br />

sequence of people who committed suicide or passed away in the wake of the 2009 lay-offs at Ssangyong<br />

Motor Company and the police suppression of strikes raged by workers. As many as 22 people killed<br />

themselves or lost their lives, including some striking workers and their family members and some non-<br />

striking workers gushed into an abyss of despair over the lay-offs. Why did so many people die? <strong>The</strong><br />

foremost reason might have been extreme anxiety and pain experienced by people who suddenly fell into<br />

poverty after the lay-offs. But in her reportage on the Ssangyong Motor incident entitled Euijanori (Chair<br />

Play), writer Gong Ji-yeong attributes the most critical cause of the tragic deaths to the post-traumatic<br />

stress syndrome suffered by workers and their families over the police’s ruthless crackdown of the strikes.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y were, in a sense, driven to death from the psychological shock of having the security of their lives<br />

shaken from the roots, the enormous violence committed by state power dashing their hopes and will for a<br />

rebound, and the trauma of disengagement and indifference of people around them.<br />

Personally, I cannot confront the despair they must have felt, nor do I have the courage to. Because<br />

approaching the complex reality of the incident is not easy and because trying to sympathize with their<br />

suffering would be presumptuous. However, the incident has too much in it for us to just walk away.<br />

Various complicated issues are implicated in it, such as how the neo-liberalist capital, a leading force of<br />

our contemporary society, has made workers powerless and to what extent global capital affects our local<br />

lives.<br />

Looking into the nature and character of the stakeholders related with the incident, we can see that the<br />

274


2009 Ssangyong Motor incident in Pyeongtaek was a very significant one in which local, national, and<br />

transnational problems were concerned all at once. Ssangyong Motor Company was sold to China’s<br />

Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation in 2004 and then handed over to India’s Mahindra Group in<br />

2009. This indicates that the identity of the capital was increasingly becoming transnational and blurred.<br />

Workers were confronted with unclear liquid ghostlike capital. <strong>The</strong> capital has completely different<br />

characteristics from domestic capital operating within the country. It is, basically, very exploitive of the<br />

labor it uses. When the dominant power of the nation-state was not weak as it is now, domestic capital<br />

maintained a certain level of attention to the welfare and protection of workers and their reproduction in<br />

the nation-state to secure a stable reproduction of labor and supply of good-quality human capital. But<br />

transnational capital seeks only capital at the expense of the wellbeing and welfare of its workers.<br />

Meanwhile, the nation-state, which is supposed to watch over this and protect workers or its ‘citizens,’<br />

is incapable of doing it and even tends to acquiesce in the abusive capital. Colluding with many legal<br />

consulting companies which support the interests of transnational capital, the state ignores or oppresses<br />

the demands of workers, its citizens, using the police force. Just as capital wanders around like a ghost,<br />

transformed into zombie capital whose identity is ambiguous, the nation-state abandons its role as the<br />

‘social state’—which intermediates conflicts between labor and capital, protects workers, and manage<br />

their stable reproduction—and changes into the ‘security state’ which does not even mind having a war<br />

against workers in order to protect the generation of enormous profit for transnational capital. 1 As capital<br />

and state transforms in nature, the status of ‘labor’ undergoes a drastic change from the past. Workers<br />

are violently suppressed by the state which they expect to stand up against foreign capital to protect their<br />

rights. <strong>The</strong> bargaining power of labor unions weakens before the complex reality of capital, leaving<br />

workers with no one to turn to. <strong>The</strong>y are pushed outside the legal protection through “ruthless violence<br />

executed by those who do not see people as people but as costs to be disposed of.” 2 Before capital and<br />

the state, workers are like ‘bare life’ in Agamben’s terminology. 3 In this condition, workers have to<br />

engage in life-or-death competition with fellow workers for survival in order to become regular workers<br />

or to maintain their non-regular employment. In short, non-regular work no longer means a temporary<br />

condition of suspension before entering regular work. It is a normal condition and reality of labor today.<br />

<strong>The</strong> real problem is that the survival game not only drives the players into a whirl of infinite competition<br />

1 On the ‘security state,’ see Zygmunt Bauman, 2005, Work, Consumerism and the New Poor, (London: Open University<br />

Press, 2005, <strong>2nd</strong> ed.), pp. 96-100.<br />

2 Gong Ji-yeong, Euijanori (Chair Play) (Seoul: Humanist, 2012), p. 88.<br />

3 On homo sacer and bare life, see Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (Stanford: Stanford<br />

University Press, 1998).<br />

275<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

but also throws the entire society into a maelstrom of intense competition. It even divides us, who stay<br />

outside the competition, into ‘I’ and the other, or, we and they. Further, it makes us turn a cold shoulder<br />

to the plight of others, or, at best, be content with expressing sympathy. Because both disengagement<br />

and sympathy are based on ‘separation’ between I and the other and between we and they, they obstruct<br />

the formation of an understanding of the fundamental relationality between we and others. In Regarding<br />

the Pain of Others, Susan Sontag explains very well how dangerous both sympathy with and apathy to<br />

others’ plight are. She notes that insofar as we are indifferent to or feel sympathy with others’ suffering,<br />

we are barred from feeling that we are accomplices to what caused the suffering. According to Sontag, our<br />

sympathy with others’ suffering is, indeed, nothing but our impotence and our innocence. <strong>The</strong> indifference<br />

and sympathy are equal to our inability to understand the relationality between we and they and between I<br />

and the other. To overcome this, Sontag calls “to set aside the sympathy we extend to others” and urges us<br />

to reflect that our privileges are an extension of their suffering and “may ... be linked to their suffering.” 4<br />

What we need to do right now is to realize that my life is implicated in others’ suffering and they are<br />

implicated in my suffering. Moreover, we should realize that not just they but I can be a bare life before<br />

the violence of capital and the state. This awakening will enable us to understand the relationality and<br />

mutuality of suffering, to learn how to see the world together, and ultimately, to seek solidarity.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Crisis of Democracy and the Generation of Redundant Lives<br />

<strong>The</strong> Ssangyong Motor incident in Pyeongtaek demonstrates a typical case of revealing the manifestation<br />

of painful life beyond the boundary of a locality in Korea under the globalizing capital. Further, the<br />

incident demonstrates well how the global domination of capital drives democracy into crisis and how<br />

much suffering it generates and how widely it spreads it. Nowadays, democracy gradually erodes from<br />

“ruthless violence executed by people who do not see people as people but as costs to be disposed of.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> spread of violence results in the diffusion of suffering. <strong>The</strong> globalization of capital surpasses the<br />

effective zone of conventional democracy, more likely to leave democracy merely in hollow form and<br />

institution in the process. Many contemporary theorists refer to the crisis of democracy originated from<br />

tyrannical capital as the end of democracy, de-democratization, and post-democracy.<br />

In Post-Democracy, Colin Crouch argues that we are entering an era of post-democracy, in which formal<br />

elements of democracy still exist but “politics and government are increasingly slipping into the grip of<br />

the privileged elites.” 5 He maintains that given the difficulty of sustaining anything approaching maximal<br />

4 Susan Sontag, Regarding the Pain of Others (New York: Picador, 2003), pp. 103-104.<br />

5 Colin Crouch, Yi Han trans., Post minjujueui (Post-Democracy) (Seoul: Mijibooks, 2008), p. 11.<br />

276


democracy, declines from democratic moments must be accepted as inevitable.” 6 Wendy Brown, who is<br />

a more radical political scientist than Crouch is, defines the contemporary reality as de-democratization<br />

noted for “the domination of politics by capital, the overtaking of democratic rationality by neoliberal<br />

rationality and the juridification of politics, globalization’s erosion of nation-state sovereignty as well as<br />

the detachment of sovereign power from nation-states.” 7 According to her, de-democratization brings<br />

about two important consequences: on the one hand, democracy loses a necessary political form and<br />

container, and on the other, the state abandons all pretenses of embodying popular sovereignty and<br />

carrying out the will of the people. 8 In addition to those scholars, many theorists generally agree that<br />

democracy is facing a crisis since the globalization. What is problematic with the crisis of democracy<br />

is that the conditions of our lives have turned extremely uncertain and vulnerable from the foundation,<br />

as the responsibility for institutional protection and safety is shifted from the state to the individual. In<br />

consequence, people falling out of the system increase in quantity and those in wretchedness explode in<br />

number. Suffering is more and more generalized and individualized.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re seems to be few theorists who capture this change better than Zygmunt Bauman. Because his<br />

writings superbly unravel how deeply and widely this change transforms our lives, I use his theory as<br />

the main basis of my argumentation in this paper. Bauman is well known to us for his concept ‘liquid<br />

modernity.’ As Karl Marx declared in <strong>The</strong> Communist Manifesto, ‘liquid modernity’ refers to the modern<br />

phenomenon that “all that is solid melts into air,” in that institutions and human relations, which were<br />

considered long-term and solid, e.g., individuality, time and place, life, labor, community and the like,<br />

melt fast and become liquid and ephemeral. Even human ideas such as death, life, love, aesthetics and<br />

so on are not exempt from the rapid change. In Liquid Times: Living in an Age of Uncertainty, Bauman<br />

notes, based on the concept liquid modernity, that challenges never before encountered emerge in the<br />

developed parts of the world, generating a series of new and interconnected departures in culture. He lists<br />

five characteristics of those departures. First, as mentioned previously, modernity has made a passage<br />

from the solid to a liquid phase. <strong>The</strong> liquid phase refers to a condition in which social forms, previously<br />

regarded as solid, disintegrate and can no longer keep the same form as before as they decompose faster<br />

than the time it takes to become solid. Second, there has been the separation and divorce of power and<br />

politics, which were like a couple under an umbrella since the emergence of the modern state until quite<br />

recently. Much of the power to act effectively that was previously available to the modern state is now<br />

moving away to the politically uncontrolled and extraterritorial global space, while politics is unable<br />

6 Ibid., p. 19.<br />

7 Wendy Brown, “We are all Democrats Now...,” in Giorgio Agamben et al., Democracy in What State? (New York: Columbia<br />

University Press, 2011), p. 48.<br />

8 Ibid., p. 49.<br />

277<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

to respond effectively to globally operating power since it remains local as before. Third, as communal<br />

and state-level support systems for individual failure and ill fortune no longer operate as before, the<br />

social foundations of social solidarity and collective action crumble. Community does not function in a<br />

meaningful way, and “interhuman bonds, once woven into a security net worthy of a large and continuous<br />

investment of time and effort, and worth the sacrifice of immediate individual interests ... become<br />

increasingly frail and admitted to be temporary.” Fourth, the framework and system of long-term thinking,<br />

planning and acting collapse. This leads to “a splicing of both political history and individual lives ...<br />

into a series of short-term projects and episodes which are in principle infinite, and do not combine into<br />

the kinds of sequences to which concepts like ‘development,’ ‘maturation,’ ‘career,’ or ‘progress’ (all<br />

suggesting a preordained order of succession) could be meaningfully applied.” Fifth, the responsibility for<br />

resolving the quandaries generated by vexing, changeable and liquid circumstances is passed from society<br />

to individuals. Individuals appear to be free to choose, but in actuality, they only bear the consequences<br />

and responsibilities for their choices. 9<br />

Those five characteristics, which form the basic assumptions of many of his books, do not look entirely<br />

unexcessive, but what Bauman tries to say here is that we have entered into a condition that individuals<br />

and capital are in direct confrontation without any mediation, as solid (pre)modern devices and solidarities<br />

such as state, community, society, and values, which used to intermediate capital and individuals, are<br />

left only in an empty crust or disassembled. In liquid modernity, ‘liquid’ refers to departures which are<br />

generated from the elimination, weakening, or disappearance of mediation. This change is manifest in two<br />

real changes. <strong>The</strong> protective covers and laws which used to defend individuals are no longer effective. If<br />

law is to write the continuation of the mediation into rules, the elimination and weakening of the mediation<br />

results in the weakening and disappearance of the law. Particularly, as the existing law is governed by<br />

other laws or powers outside its influence, the boundary between law and non-law is obscure, and chaos,<br />

disorder and lawlessness is routinized. In other words, those exceptional emergencies become normal.<br />

Further, in a lawless condition, individuals stand defenseless, like ‘bare life,’ before the exploitation of<br />

capital without any protective devices or a safety mechanism. <strong>The</strong>refore, individual life and labor may be<br />

treated as ‘redundancy’ anytime if it is no longer useful to capital.<br />

Bauman interprets this change as a shift of paradigmatic criterion from ‘unemployment’ to ‘redundancy.’<br />

According to him, unemployment presupposes the normal state of one’s employment in the future<br />

although one may be currently unemployed. That is, unemployment assumes that ‘employment’ is the<br />

normal condition and ‘complete employment’ is an ideal one. In contrast, in the concept of redundancy,<br />

9 For the summary of the five characteristics, I refer to and cite from Zygmunt Bauman, Liquid Times: Living in an Age of<br />

Uncertainty (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007), pp. 1-4.<br />

278


edundancy itself is the normal condition. Redundancy signifies lives that are not used again or dumped in<br />

society, i.e., wasted lives.<br />

What is more serious than the generation of human refuse is that the redundant are regarded as thoroughly<br />

valueless in nature and also dangerous. It is defined as “a cancerous growth gnawing at the healthy tissues<br />

of the society, and a public enemy which threatens ‘our way of life’ and ‘our core values’.” 10 Bauman<br />

mentions various specific examples of superfluous populations, of whom he draws special attention to the<br />

underclass and refugees. <strong>The</strong> underclass and refugees are exemplary redundant products of globalizing<br />

capital. <strong>The</strong> former is the refuse produced in the process that capital exploits people in developed countries<br />

where it has already reached the limit. <strong>The</strong> latter are generated in the process that globally mobile capital<br />

exploits people and their lives in various latecomer countries and regions. Specifically, the former is<br />

produced out of already saturated well-trained labor in developed countries, whereas the latter are<br />

superfluous populations created in the process that global capital exploits impoverished and poor regions<br />

around the world.<br />

In Bauman’s view, the underclass is the human excess that is imagined in a completely different<br />

manner from the conventional working class. While the working class is represented from the view of<br />

employment, the underclass is represented from that of refuse. Further, the working class is posited in<br />

an image that it is able to play a useful role in society and make a meaningful contribution to social life,<br />

but the underclass is imaged in an entirely different way from the working class. <strong>The</strong>y are imagined<br />

as “a class of people who are beyond classes and outside hierarchy, with neither chance nor need of<br />

readmission.” 11 <strong>The</strong>y have no role to play, make no useful contribution to the lives of the rest, and exist<br />

beyond redemption. <strong>The</strong>ir only role in society is making impoverishment and poverty look normal.<br />

Hence, their existence makes people regard poverty and destitution as an individual problem which does<br />

not require the society or the state to fix it.<br />

While the underclass is branded the enemy within, there are groups of people who are called external<br />

enemies flown in from outside. <strong>The</strong>y are immigrants and refugees. Originating from somewhere outside,<br />

they pose a threat to Western society and cannot be incorporated into it. “Refugees, the displaced, asylum<br />

seekers, migrants, the sans papiers, they are the waste of globalization.” 12 Staying in camps installed in the<br />

periphery of the Western world which they cannot even enter, the “human waste is unable to play any role<br />

in the place of their arrival or sojourn.” <strong>The</strong>y are treated as “strangers who are everywhere and nowhere<br />

10 Bauman, Wasted Lives: Modernity and its Outcasts (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004), p. 41.<br />

11 Bauman, Work, Consumerism and the New Poor (Bershire: Open University Press, 2005), p. 71.<br />

12 Bauman, Wasted Lives: Modernity and its Outcasts, p. 58.<br />

279<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

at the same time (in the case of refugees)” 13 or as “the human waste of distant parts of the globe unloaded<br />

onto our own backyard” 14 who threatens the security of the Western world, like the underclass (in the case<br />

of migrants). Whether they are admitted to the Western society or not, they live wasted lives in indefinite<br />

alienation in camps or ghettos.<br />

As shown above, Bauman’s reasoning of liquid modernity and globalization unmasks amazingly well<br />

how fast human life and institutional forms like state and community are transforming. His analysis<br />

on the production of wasted lives and redundancy illustrates succinctly how much human suffering<br />

the globalization of capital creates and how fast their anxiety and pain increases with the shift of<br />

responsibilities from society to individuals. His delineation on the wasted lives of the underclass, migrants,<br />

and refugees, who are pushed to the margins as useless existences for making no contribution to society,<br />

presents an important theoretical reflection on how many subalterns are created by the globalizing capital.<br />

In addition, his discussion on redundancy makes a great contribution to developing Agamben’s analysis<br />

of the concept of homo sacer in the modern nation-state into an examination of the mode of life of homo<br />

sacer at the global level.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Limits of Liquid Modernity and Transmodern Solidarity<br />

Despite his excellent reflection and analysis, the alternatives and solutions suggested by Bauman seem<br />

to be pessimistic and rather weak, relative to the sharpness and richness of his analysis. He compares<br />

wasted lives to the old and the new big brothers toward the end of his book. <strong>The</strong> old big brother was that<br />

of ‘inclusion’ which controlled people and watched and prevented their deviance, whereas the new big<br />

brother is that of ‘exclusion’ which selects unfitting ones, labels them ‘waste’ and banishes them. What is<br />

more noteworthy comes in the next part. He argues, “at the dawn of the new century the biggest question<br />

to which we should find an answer is which of the two big brothers we would select.” 15 While we would<br />

like to make a different choice or have an alternative suggestion by which to forego making a choice, the<br />

question binds us constantly within the dilemma of choosing one of the two. It is a pessimistic question, as<br />

it tends to eliminate the possibility of asking many other questions. On the other hand, in the conclusion of<br />

Work, Consumerism and the New Poor, Bauman suggests an ideal alternative, which is very different from<br />

the one in Wasted Lives and very unlikely to be realized. Noting that the creation of ubiquitous redundant<br />

lives originates from the work ethic that payable labor is accepted as the sole value of labor, he urges to<br />

ponder on making a transition to an economy in which labor is separated from the labor market, that is,<br />

13 Ibid., p. 80.<br />

14 Ibid., p. 56.<br />

15 Ibid., p. 133.<br />

280


one in which the integrity and dignity of human labor is acknowledged, for instance, a moral economy in<br />

opposition to the capitalist economy, or workmanship ethics. 16 <strong>The</strong>se alternative options look plausible,<br />

but he hardly examines or addresses where the power and actors to execute the transition come from, thus<br />

making it sound hollow and idealistic.<br />

Now, let us take a critical look at the limits of Bauman’s theory. In my view, the reason why he cannot<br />

present a realistic alternative and a specific solution is that his analysis dwells too much on the liquid<br />

modernity which produces countless wasted lives and the grandiose unilateral process of the globalization<br />

of capital and overlooks the existence of various confrontational lives and the creation and continuation<br />

of values against the tide of the grandiose process within society. For him, the redundant are powerless<br />

and their lives are isolated from those of others. Paying so much attention to the one-way process in<br />

which the underclass, refugees, and migrants are represented in ‘wasted lives,’ he fails to recognize the<br />

fact that they have the potential capacity to debunk the logical fabrication of society which creates them<br />

or represents them as redundancy and refuse. In this regard, Bauman’s redundancy is both at once similar<br />

to and different from the subaltern as postcolonial theorists have said. While the redundant are clearly<br />

represented and readily defined, the subaltern are more fundamental, thus impossible to be represented in<br />

the existing diction and discourse. <strong>The</strong>ir invisibility unveils that the established systems are parasitic to<br />

them and sustain themselves by wielding violence to them. 17 An example of this may be found in Spivak’s<br />

article, “Can the Subaltern Speak?” From the position of invisible subaltern women, Spivak sharply<br />

discloses the accompliceship of British imperialism and Indian patriarchy over Indian colonial women<br />

(widows) who were forced to commit suicide by their husband’s brothers after their deaths. In Jacques<br />

Ranciere’s scheme, Bauman’s redundancy is seen from the view of the police, whereas the existence of<br />

the subaltern is unveiled from the perspective of politics. Ranciere defines the concepts of ‘politics’ and<br />

‘police’ as the method and system of classifying the ways that people act, exist, and speak into different<br />

categories. <strong>The</strong> police carries out the function of ordering various places and positions composing the<br />

society, i.e., differentiation and distribution. It divides people into those who have a share in society and<br />

those who do not and controls or excludes the latter by giving them a certain fixed identity. In other words,<br />

the police is “a community of identities, set places and roles.” 18 Meanwhile, Ranciere defines politics as “the<br />

process of subjectification disintegrating the distribution of set places and roles.” 19 Politics disassembles<br />

and then reassembles the way of distributing shares on the principle of equality. According to this scheme,<br />

16 Bauman, Work, Consumerism and the New Poor, pp. 117-121.<br />

17 Gayatri Spivak, “Can the Subaltern Speak?” in Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg (eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation<br />

of Culture (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1988).<br />

18 Jacques Ranciere, Yang Chang-ryeol trans., Jeongchijeokin geoteui gajangjarieseo (Margins of the Political) (Seoul:<br />

Gil, 2008), p. 28.<br />

19 Ibid., p. 30.<br />

281<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Bauman’s analysis of redundant lives and existences approaches the viewpoint of the police. Unlike<br />

Spivak, Bauman does not seem to agonize over who will be the subjects to practice a ‘new distribution of<br />

parts and shares’ against the globalization of capital which creates suffering of many lives.<br />

Here I would like to take a closer look at the limits of Bauman’s theory, as they seem to be connected<br />

with his unique concept liquid modernity and further, the Eurocentric perspective. <strong>The</strong> concept of liquid<br />

modernity has three characteristics, which distinguish his theory from others on modernity. First, his<br />

theory on liquid modernity supposes, like postmodernism put forth by Fredric Jameson, Jean Baudrillard,<br />

and Jean-Francois Lyotard, that contemporary culture is not a new cultural phenomenon or logic separated<br />

from modernity, but it originates in it, only with a different speed of liquidity. In other words, liquid<br />

modernity is an extension of modernity, so its change can be comprehended by understanding the modern<br />

culture. This is similar to the theory of Ulrich Beck and Anthony Giddens. <strong>The</strong> globalization of capital<br />

is not a break with modernity but a critical momentum of accelerating the liquid culture of modernity<br />

in virtually all aspects, including time and space, humanity, life, emotions and so on. That is the second<br />

characteristic of his theory. <strong>The</strong> third one is that based on this conception, he asserts that liquid modernity<br />

is clearly different from the previous solid modernity. Liquid modernity signifies the liquid, temporary,<br />

and disintegrating cultural reality of today, a drastically different reality from the one criticized by critical<br />

theorists such as Max Weber who stressed the protestant ethic of work, Michel Foucault who analyzed<br />

modern disciplinary regimes of surveillance and discipline, and Adorno and Habermas who criticized<br />

totalitarian society and mass culture based on the rationality of control and identity. <strong>The</strong> greatest strength<br />

of Bauman’s analysis is that it captures the new cultural logic and phenomenon of modernity which is<br />

missing in the existing critiques of modernity. <strong>The</strong> cultural reality probed by the previous theories on<br />

modernity is different from the one we live in, which is a changed one. Hence, liquid modernity is not a<br />

break with modernity, as in postmodernism, nor a mere continuity of modernity, like in the conventional<br />

logic of modernity. Rather, it is a theory on internal departures of the extension of modernity. Despite<br />

those distinct features, however, Bauman’s modernity concept is not much different from those of<br />

other thinkers. His concept of liquid modernity shows a strong tendency of interpreting the postmodern<br />

analysis of cultural phenomena not as postmodern phenomena but as internal departures from modernity.<br />

Whether it is internal departures from modernity or a break from it, it is a very controversial issue. But<br />

this question is not a radical one as it presupposes a certain notion on ‘modernity’ itself. <strong>The</strong> notion<br />

hinges on two presuppositions on modernity. <strong>The</strong> first one is that modernity is based on rationality as a<br />

philosophical principle, scientific rationalism as a principle of comprehending nature, and Enlightenment<br />

as political thought, and human subjects develop progressively from a subjugated immature state to an<br />

autonomous mature one. <strong>The</strong> second one is that modernity began in modern Europe with several breakups<br />

and departures and then spread to the entire world, whether it was an imperialist expansion characterized<br />

by violent exploitation, or the diffusion of advanced civilizations. <strong>The</strong>y are the two most important<br />

282


presuppositions which buttress the Eurocentric view on modernity. Bauman’s notion of liquid modernity<br />

is also grounded on his own interpretation of the two presuppositions. While liquid modernity is an altered<br />

interpretation of the first presupposition, the globalization of capital is that of the second one. That is,<br />

liquid modernity represents the phenomena that with the deepening of the first presupposition, institutions<br />

and human relations which used to appear long-term, continuous, and perpetual became liquid, temporary,<br />

and fashionable. And the globalization of capital represents the process that liquid modernity originated<br />

in Europe turns planetary and produces countless wasted lives and suffering of the redundant around the<br />

world.<br />

However, the Eurocentric perspective of modernity regarding ‘modernity’ has been widely challenged. Its<br />

most critical problem is that it banishes out of modernity various forms of lives, existences, and values in<br />

numerous places within and outside of Europe. Negri and Hardt stress that modernity must be understood<br />

as a power relation rather than in terms of reason, Enlightenment, the break with tradition, secularism,<br />

and so forth. 20 To understand modernity as a ‘power relation’ means to give less focus on the dominant<br />

characteristics or the origin of Western modernity than on the lived experiences of domination and<br />

resistance in the West and of oppression and struggle between the Western and non-Western worlds. In<br />

particular, Negri and Hardt reject the perspective of origin and expansion and employ that of encounters. In<br />

this perspective, modernity did not occur in the specific place named Europe but in the process of clashes<br />

and compromises of different forces and colonial encounters of the Western and non-Western worlds.<br />

Working from the standpoint of colonial encounters, two facts unveiled: that “precolonial civilizations<br />

are in many cases very advanced, rich, complex, and sophisticated” and that “the contributions of the<br />

colonized to so-called modern civilization are substantial and largely unacknowledged.” 21<br />

Negri and Hardt do not say it directly but Enrique Dussel argues early on the close relationship between<br />

modernity and coloniality. In a paper titled “Ethnocentrism and Modernity” presented in Frankfurt in<br />

1993, Dussel criticizes that the Ethnocentric narrative on modernity is an irrational myth. Enrique Dussel,<br />

“Eurocentrism and Modernity,” 22 He emphasizes that the modernity concept was constructed on the basis<br />

of a complete concealment of the colonialization of America (dawned in 1492) and its consequences.<br />

Further, he distinguishes two opposing paradigms on modernity, the Eurocentric and the planetary.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Eurocentric paradigm is built on the logic of origin and expansion mentioned before. For Dussel,<br />

modernity is solely a European phenomenon: “Modern sovereignty develops spacially, according to<br />

20 Antonio Negri and Michael Hardt,<br />

Antonio Negri and Michael Hardt, Commonwealth (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009), p. 67.<br />

21 Ibid., p. 68.<br />

Ibid., p. 68.<br />

22 Boundary 2, 1993, p. 65. For a detailed discussion on this, see Kim Yong-gyu,<br />

Boundary 2, 1993, p. 65. For a detailed discussion on this, see Kim Yong-gyu, Transmodernity and Ecology of Culture:<br />

Colonial Differences and a Critique of Eurocentric Modernity, Cogito 70 (August, 2011).<br />

283<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

the Eurocentric paradigm, from the Italy of the Renaissance to the Germany of the Reformation and the<br />

Enlightenment, to the France of the French Revolution.” 23 In this paradigm, Europe is the center and<br />

only Europe can achieve universal modernity. Meanwhile, the planetary paradigm does not deny the<br />

central position of Europe in modernity, but highlights that the European centrality does not develop by<br />

itself, but from its relations with others existing outside Europe. European modernity is the “culture of<br />

the center of the world-system achieved through the incorporation of Amerindia” and a “result of the<br />

management of this centrality.” In other words, the centrality of European modernity is “not the sole fruit<br />

of an internal superiority accumulated during the European Middle Ages against other cultures. Instead, it<br />

is also the fundamental effect of the simple fact of the discovery, conquest, colonialization and integration<br />

(subsumption) of Amerindia.” 24 This expands the existing notion of Western modernity to the global level<br />

on the one hand and requires its fundamental revision on the other.<br />

This view emphasizes that the dark underside of modernity is coloniality. Dussel stresses the need for a<br />

complete shift in understanding modernity in the quest for a comprehensive reassessment and liberation<br />

of the cultures and values of numerous others who are oppressed and concealed by modernity/coloniality.<br />

For this, he proposes a new concept, transmodernity, by which he tries to embrace and transverse the<br />

duality of achievements and limitations of Western modernity by acknowledging oppressed others and<br />

their cultures. While Western modernity has been founded on the culture of the ‘rational myth’ built on<br />

the identity of the self without acknowledging others and their cultures, Dussel stresses a transmodern<br />

thinking based on the ‘reason of others’ who are oppressed by the culture of the self. Others and their<br />

cultures have been derogated as being “utterly worthless, meaningless, trivial, and useless.” 25 In his view,<br />

those people and their cultures did not disappear despite tantamount violence and oppression. That is<br />

because they were not completely integrated into the totality of the modern/colonial world-system and<br />

maintained the relationship of otherness and exteriority to it, i.e., living labor. Here, exteriority, a concept<br />

of Levinas, means transcendental otherness that cannot be integrated into totality; for Dussel, that is<br />

the condition which enables liberation from totality. According to him, because of the exteriority which<br />

hinders incorporation into the logic of the totality of Western modernity, or an “omnipresent and latent<br />

alterity,” 26 they still harbor vivid cultural richness. Relying on the rich cultures of others, Dussel defines<br />

that transmodernity “(as a project of political, economic, ecological, erotic, pedagogic, and religious<br />

liberation) is the co-realization of that which it is impossible for modernity to accomplish by itself” 27 . It<br />

23 Dussel, Beyond Eurocentrism: <strong>The</strong> <strong>World</strong>-System and the Limits of Modernity, in Fredric Jameson and Masao Miyoshi<br />

(eds.), <strong>The</strong> Cultures of Globalization (Durham: Duke University Press, 1998), p. 4.<br />

24 Dussel, p. 5.<br />

25 Dussel, Transmodernity and Interculturality: An Interpretation from the Perspective of Philosophy of Liberation, p. 17.<br />

26 Dussel, p. 17.<br />

27 Dussel, Ethnocentrism and Modernity, p. 76.<br />

284


seeks “mutual realization of liberation through an incorporative solidarity ... between center/periphery,<br />

man/woman ... different ethnic groups, different classes, civilization/nature, western culture/Third<br />

<strong>World</strong> cultures, etc.” Dussel’s concept of transmodernity enriches the notion of subaltern even more and<br />

contributes to specificating the necessity of political solidarity. Thus, the subaltern not only plays the role<br />

of opening up the existing space in a new way at the conceptional level, but also emerges in the political<br />

stage as people seeking political solidity for the realization of equality.<br />

Now we understand why Bauman’s analysis of liquid modernity and globalization of capital is weak and<br />

idealistic in proposing alternatives and solutions. We also understand why Bauman excellently shows that<br />

the globalization of capital causes the globalization of suffering and produces so many wasted lives and<br />

immeasurable agony to them but does not view them as having potential capacity for change. To him,<br />

they are literally waste generated by liquid modernity and globalizing capital. Being controlled, surveilled,<br />

and deprived of political ability, they are merely the targets of the police. <strong>The</strong>y cannot be connected with<br />

others in suffering because their suffering is individualized and separated. <strong>The</strong>refore, there is no possibility<br />

of political solidarity among them.<br />

We need to look at the globalization of capital from an opposite standpoint from Bauman, that is, that of<br />

the subaltern. Bauman speaks on the creation of redundancy and waste from the view of the globalization<br />

of capital, but we should look at it from the view of the subaltern, living labor. Bauman has a top-down<br />

stance, but we need a bottom-up approach. This shift in position means more than having a different<br />

perspective; it enables us to posit a completely different understanding of suffering, i.e., the politics of<br />

solidarity. Those lives of refuse and waste are dead ones chased away by globalizing capital. What does<br />

suffering mean in modern-day capitalistic life? It means that living labor is used solely for producing<br />

capitalistic values in subjugation to the capitalistic relations, or they do not recognize themselves as such<br />

and live wasted lives thrown out of the loop of capitalistic relations. <strong>The</strong>y suffer as slaves or excesses of<br />

capitalistic liquid modernity. <strong>The</strong> globalization of capital makes living labor into refuse and waste, but at<br />

the same time, it creates the subaltern of living labor around the world. An alternative way to confront the<br />

globalization of capital would be to connect their suffering and not individualize it. This ultimately means<br />

to cut the chain of the competitive game of survival which makes others’ living labor into redundancy,<br />

realize the relationality with others and spur their lives as well as our own, and build a new relationality on<br />

that basis.<br />

285<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Divorce Disputes, Property Right, and Legal Pluralism in a<br />

North China Village<br />

Zhao Xudong<br />

Renmin University<br />

…there is no place in the world where a marriage was seen as a privacy of the spouses themselves<br />

that anybody else couldn’t take an interest in. Fei Xiaotong (1981, 33).<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>The</strong> history of Chinese people can be seen as one of recyling by which many current social phenomena are<br />

made sense. To the problem of marriage, it is also no exclusive. <strong>The</strong> ideology of modern China once has<br />

dominated under the basic tone of revolution. Anyway, revoulution (geming) will be sought as an excuse<br />

under which any rule or custom, unsatified the interest of some kinds of class, would be legitimately<br />

demolished under the name of “bad custom” (lousu). In this sense, a successful revolution, symbollically,<br />

is no more than a replacement of old custom with a new fashionable one. As a ridical transformation of<br />

the revolution, when it is exposed some kind of shortcomings, the socalled old custom will be revenuated<br />

and caught its own legitimate position in a social structure. <strong>The</strong> process is familer in social anthropology<br />

that is often called “model of oscillation” (Leach 1954) by which the developmental line of the Chinese<br />

modern history can also make sense. Pertain to my concerning about rural marriage and divorce, every<br />

revision on <strong>The</strong> Marriage Law might must be seen as a consequence of this kind of thought of revolution.<br />

This kind of revolutionary transformation was happened in the beginning in the urban area and then<br />

spreaded into the rural area. In the same time, marriage custom would be changed in a slow way in<br />

traditional village community than in urban settings. This hypothesis can be checked from my own<br />

collected divorce cases in the Li village of Hebei province in People’s Republic China, where I have done<br />

fieldwork for four months. On the one hand, there is a powerful state law of marriage; and on the other<br />

hand, there is also much more local costums on which the indegious ideas of marriage and property are<br />

circumscribed.<br />

286


Marriage contract and its custom<br />

<strong>The</strong> Li village, readdressed under my own naming, is situated in the eastern part of the county Zhao. <strong>The</strong><br />

village was lived about 1100 households and 5000 people when I studied there in 1997 (Zhao 2003, 31).<br />

Marriage of the village, learned from my informants, was approval of being engaged as they were very<br />

young. A child, for example, even in his or her two or three-years-old, mother of the child would like to<br />

find a marriage target as soon as she had had a chance in talking with someone else. Once she knew a<br />

child of a family would be satisfied her own ideal target, she would find a matchmaker to help her to make<br />

a marriage appointment with the family of the ideal target. If the family agreed with the appointment, the<br />

mother of the child would exchange a formal tie (a note of marriage appointment) with the parents of the<br />

family. <strong>The</strong> tie is often written on a piece of red paper and exchanged in a selected day, i.e., jiri (a lucky<br />

day). <strong>The</strong> most important message that should be written on the tie is so-called shengchen bazi, meant the<br />

born time of children of both sides.<br />

Generally, each village always has men or women to whom they can calculate by themselves the harmony<br />

between someone’s born time and her or his future life. Those persons are often respected and called<br />

xiansheng (a mister). In Li village, they are often called nengren (an able man). Li Qinggang was at lest<br />

one of nengren in Li village from whom I learned a lot from him on the knowledge about the custom of<br />

the village before he died in 2001. He used to apply the traditional way of mingli (a rational of fate) to<br />

decide a fitness on born time between a boy and a girl. He once had showed his own collected book under<br />

the title of <strong>The</strong> Lucky or Unlucky Tables of Marriage Fitness Between a Man and a Woman (nannü nayin<br />

mingpei jixiong biao) which is written in a poetic form that is an expressive index of an mutual relational<br />

meaning of the different fitness, such as, jin (metal), mu (wood), shui (water), huo (fire), and tu (earth),<br />

between various men and women with different born time. It is also summarized in the following eight<br />

different kinds of combination. We are told:<br />

Wood pluses wood is forest.<br />

<strong>The</strong>ir children should be educated.<br />

Wood and fire can be given birth each other.<br />

Happiness would be come if you were<br />

tolerant.<br />

Wood is created from earth.<br />

Wealth and treasures would be full<br />

of a basin.<br />

Male wood female wood<br />

<strong>The</strong> wood will be broken as wind is coming.<br />

Would be supported but not satisfied.<br />

Male wood female fire<br />

Harmony would be emerged just by<br />

obligation.<br />

A son born in the year of horse would be<br />

given emoluments.<br />

Male wood female earth<br />

Seed would be matured followed the<br />

flowering.<br />

A little regret of you is your son in<br />

weakness.<br />

287<br />

Many quarrels between the pair of spouses.<br />

Would be fallen into illness, weakness,<br />

and sadness.<br />

Quarrel would be happened once in a while.<br />

A long life you are and wife is virtuous.<br />

Husband and wife would be much more in<br />

harmony.<br />

Waiting for a lucky after practice on your<br />

moral integrity.<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Metal overcomes wood and changed into<br />

useful things.<br />

Charity with a deep belief.<br />

It is smoothly that wood is born from water.<br />

You will be flourished in the end.<br />

It will be half lucky because of its birth in<br />

going against.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is trust between the husband and<br />

wife.<br />

Fire is more powerful as it being added<br />

another fire.<br />

You should make a concession between<br />

each other.<br />

It is harmony just because earth is born<br />

from fire.<br />

Wealth and treasures would be full of<br />

your home.<br />

Male wood female metal<br />

You must be careful when you are walking.<br />

Peace and good in every year.<br />

Male wood female water<br />

It is going against when water upon water.<br />

Farm land surrounded kitchen smoke and<br />

much more cows and horses are grown.<br />

Male fire female wood<br />

<strong>The</strong> wife is dominant but the husband weak.<br />

You will have many more sons and<br />

daughters.<br />

Male fire female fire<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are many quarrels between the<br />

husband and the wife.<br />

Worries on catastrophe then will be avoided.<br />

Male fire female earth<br />

Harmony and happiness will be got between<br />

the husband and the wife.<br />

Many sons and daughters will be born of.<br />

288<br />

<strong>The</strong> most basic thing is to work hard<br />

and save.<br />

Happy with your sons and grandsons.<br />

It is taken more efforts on your family<br />

property.<br />

More and more sons and daughters you will<br />

have.<br />

It will be high on your fame and gain.<br />

You would be no sons if you harmed a<br />

virtue.<br />

Family disturbance will be emerged.<br />

Sons should be given more education.<br />

A long life like a pine tree.<br />

Both of you will be supported.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fitness of a boy and a girl just got through above checking of born time is often led a marriageable<br />

marriage between them. A tie of marriage proposal will be asked written down on the male side. A general<br />

form of the tie is written as: “Request the honour of your permition, with a golden promise, the inferior<br />

dependant Li Wenzhong with respect.” 1 When the female side received the tie, rechecking of born time<br />

is necessary. After it has been done that there is no conflict between the two couples, a tie of marriage<br />

agreement is asked, a replying tie is often written as: “With the honor of your request: Our respected<br />

dependants of affinity with our respect Yue Zhongtai.” 2 <strong>The</strong> first exchange of tie is also called huantie<br />

which will be kept by the parents of both sides. When their children have grown up till the marriageable<br />

age, the male side should find a matchmaker to whom the affair of the engagement will be consulted.<br />

<strong>The</strong> engagement is also called xiatie (sending a note) which should be sent on the male side. <strong>The</strong> female<br />

side should be xietie (thanks for the note) after the note of the male has been accepted and received. <strong>The</strong><br />

note of the male is often written as: “Request the honour of your clear meaning, with a golden promise.<br />

[Name of] the dependants of affinity”. 3 A xietie of the female is often written as: “With the honour of your<br />

request: Our respected dependants of affinity. [Name of] the dependants of affinity.” 4 Finally a banquet<br />

prepared by the male side is also needed that in which some of relatives of both sides and the matchmaker


will be companied and through which the date of wedding should be fixed.<br />

In generally, every village has special persons to write this kind of marriage notes (huntie). In the Li<br />

village, those tasks were charged by Li Qinggang before his death in 2001. He himself had kept A Manual<br />

Book of Notes (tiepu) in which many kinds of notes were included, such as note for son born, funeral rites,<br />

and for congratulation to the elderly people, etc.<br />

In rural China, high betrothal gifts (caili) given by the female side are often needed. Otherwise, it is<br />

said that the betrothal gifts would be absent to the girls of Li village although in the nearby villages the<br />

betrothal gift is still expensive. It is certainly that small money about 500 to 2000 yuan should be given by<br />

the male side on the day of engagement. But about a ten thousand yuan valued dowry will be returned to<br />

the male side on the day of wedding. By the way of high expensive dowry of the female side, the marriage<br />

would be thought of benefit to the girl because she would be little insulted after she has been married into<br />

the home of the male side.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ceremony of dowry receiving is often a public event in a Chinese village. In a general way, the dowry<br />

would be took and presented by the female side in the early morning of the last day before the wedding<br />

day. When the dowry is arriving, firecracker will be fired by the female side in the mean while persons<br />

of the male side will come out to receive the dowry. <strong>The</strong> whole village of the male side would also go<br />

together to view the lively event of dowry carrying to the home of the male. It is spread at once in the<br />

whole village that how many dowry and their concrete terms and the gossip about the wealth or poverty of<br />

the bride are.<br />

A wedding day in the rural area is often full of ritual and fun in public view. In the early morning as the<br />

sun not yet raised, the bridegroom will be accompanied with several village people to go to the bride’s<br />

home by cars. When they arrived at the bride’s home, she had often intended delay a period of time by<br />

which to denote her unwilling to leave her own parents’ home. It is also a time that the relatives of the<br />

bridegroom and of the bride can communicate each other.<br />

Before the bridegroom takes with the bride going out of the door of her home, the relatives of the<br />

bride daubed the bridegroom’s face with some of black pot ash. <strong>The</strong> bride afterward is carried by the<br />

bridegroom into the first one of the vehicle procession meeting the bride and her relatives. Firecracker<br />

will be fired as soon as the vehicle procession is being emerged on the entrance of the bridegroom’s<br />

village. In the same time, the bride’s family at once prepared their rites to meet the bride and her relatives.<br />

Participants taking part in those rites are those relatives of five-submission (wufu) on the bridegroom side<br />

and some key relatives of the bride side. It is certainly that all of the villagers of the bridegroom’s village<br />

289<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

would be welcomed. <strong>The</strong> whole day of the wedding is occupied by the rituals, such as bai tiandi (to<br />

worship the Heaven and the Earth) and ren daxiao (to identify relatives in orderly), which should be done<br />

by both bride and bridegroom. By the way of those rites, a marriage relationship between the bridegroom<br />

and the bride is recognized that is obviously not recognized by the way of written forms than that of public<br />

rituals. In other words, after those lively rituals and events, anybody in the village knows who’s who is<br />

a new wife of somebody in the village. Feast after the rites of meeting is necessary in which relatives of<br />

both sides are treated with kind hospitality.<br />

Divorce in Traditional China<br />

Marriage is one kind of social ties by which a family is formed. An average family can be expressed<br />

in a reverse triangle pattern on the two top points of which are occupied by a pair of spouses and the<br />

lower point is their child or children (Radcliffe-Brown 1926, 160). Professor Fei Xiaotong declares<br />

that the relationship between the husband and wife can be seen as the contractual one. Not only can it<br />

be fitted in the society of one husband and one wife, it is also applied in the society of polyandry and<br />

polygamy, because all those societies are based on the marriage contract relationship between two or more<br />

individuals (Fei 1981, 77). If we accordingly saw a marriage relation as one kind of contract, it must have<br />

some kinds of condition or principle by which a contract would be concluded or canceled. Those kinds<br />

of condition or principles, if there were, would be combined with a society rather than with individuals.<br />

Under this sense, we had to talk about some transformation of marriage morals.<br />

In the same sense, one kind of marriage arrangement believed unreasonable in the present could be taken<br />

for grant in ancient societies; and an approved marriage in our culture would be thought of the slandered<br />

in other cultures. <strong>The</strong>re is no other reason that can be used to explain those variations unless the different<br />

principles on the marriage contract being concluded or canceled were proposed. Divorce with wife, for<br />

example, in ancient China, which is often called chu (to send forth), qi (to abandon), fang (to send away),<br />

or xiu (to oust) etc. (Tai 1978, 77), would be never thought of a slandered thing. According to Dadai<br />

Liji (Book of Rites of Elder Dai), a classic of Confucianism, a husband is given power to send forth his<br />

wife if she is thought of under the following seven conditions, such as, being un-filial to her parents-in-<br />

law, having no son, adultery, jealousy, malignant disease, talking to much, stealing (Tai 1978, 85; Tao &<br />

Ming 1994, 254-61). 5 Generally speaking, kindred people of an abandoned wife have no good reason to<br />

argue with the husband that why his wife should be sent forth. Otherwise when somebody asked for the<br />

5 <strong>The</strong> Seven Conditions was given a little more revision and then kept in Tang Ordinances (Tang Ling) in a sequence as:<br />

having no son, adultery and licentiousness, being unfilial to the parents-in-law (or failing to serve them with care), talking<br />

to much, stealing, jealousy, malignant disease. Cited from: Tai (1978, 85).<br />

290


condition of the wife, the kindred people of the wife would manage to answer with the rhetoric words,<br />

such as dagui (great coming) or laigui (coming back), because people in that time conceived that most of<br />

responsibility should be attributed to the female side if she was expelled (Dong 1995, 277-85). 6<br />

In eras of the imperial China, before a modern nation-state was established, the relationship between the<br />

husband and wife was not directly controlled by a central state rather than a lineage or an ancestor. <strong>The</strong><br />

status of a wife, in a consequence, would be affected by three kinds of power, i.e., power of ancestral<br />

temple or lineal orthodoxy, of her mother’s brothers and father’s sisters, of her husband (Tao 1934, 48).<br />

Many stories therefore haven been talked about that how a wife to whom her husband deeply loved also<br />

had been sent away as a punishment because the husband’s parents had had little harmony with the wife. 7<br />

Those ideas have been inevitably undergone some transformation. At least in a society of contemporary<br />

China, there is never a personal right of treatment on the dissolution of a marriage relationship at all. This<br />

kind of rights has been entrusted to an institutional authority under which all of divorce disputes would be<br />

resolved by the way of mediation or an adjudication being sent. <strong>The</strong> agency of the institutional authority is<br />

obviously of the national court located in different administrative levels.<br />

Property seeking in the divorce disputes<br />

As a basic-level court, how does it work on a villager’s divorce dispute? What are the principles that it<br />

will be depended How are those principles fitted to or conflicted with the local logic of life All those<br />

questions are my special considerations and tried to answer based on my own fieldwork and archives<br />

collection in Li village.<br />

In a nutshell, divorce is not a easy thing in the village. Bickering between the husband and wife is not<br />

always seen as a disordered thing in a family. Several couples even quarreled to the step of divorce but it<br />

had been in the finally ended and never mentioned again just through various mediations in the village. A<br />

real divorce would be happened if the bickering between the husband and wife never mediated at all. <strong>The</strong><br />

6 It is certain that the divorce right on the side of husband doesn’t mean there is an absolute freedom. <strong>The</strong>re are also rules<br />

of <strong>The</strong> Three Limitations (san buchu) by which some limited rights of a wife are being protected. <strong>The</strong> Three Limitations<br />

is recorded in Da Dai Li Ji as “a. If the wife has no place to return to. b. Having observed three years mourning for the<br />

parents-in-law. c. If the husband had been poor and humble at the time of marriage, and become rich and noble later” (Tai<br />

1978, 85).<br />

7 In Li Ji (Book of Rites), a Chinese classic, there is a section titled “li nei ze” (Rules of Governing Wife) that can also be<br />

seen as the principles of divorce. Some words concerned about inharmony between a wife and her parents-in-law which<br />

are recorded as: “A son is very approved his wife, nevertheless, his parents have no pleasure to her, she is therefore sent<br />

forth” (Cited from: Tao 1934, 49).<br />

291<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

court mediation named shuohe (to persuade to bind together) will be initiated through which a final result<br />

of shuohe or panli (divorce through adjudication) will be achieved. In other words, divorce dispute will be<br />

resolved either in success by the way of mediation or failure into divorce via the adjudication of the court.<br />

<strong>The</strong> former one is called shuohe and the latter panli.<br />

Shuohe (persuade to bind together)<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are several sets of binding rites that will be initiated after two families were engaged into quasi-<br />

marriage relatives. Those rites would have been hold as the two families were met in the first time till<br />

wedding had been hold. It is obviously that those rites would have been disappeared as a pair of couples<br />

could not live together anymore. In some occasions, a reasonable argument between the two sides of a<br />

marriage would be raised.<br />

When the husband and wife was falling into quarrels, a strategy most often mobilized is that of the wife<br />

will go back her own parents’ home living for a period of time. In the period, both sides of the spouses<br />

would be engaged into private mediations trying to restore an ordered state of the family. If one side of the<br />

spouses did not feel good after the private mediations had been done, generally speaking, their family life<br />

could not maintained on going, cadres of the Villagers’ Mediation Committee (cunmin tiaojie weiyuanhui,<br />

VMC) will come into the view to do mediations on the dispute. Nevertheless, a cadre of the committee<br />

told me that what they can do just some of limited things meeting a divorce dispute. If the husband and<br />

wife are being in a stage of bickering and wrangling (chaochao naonao), their neighbors and the cadres<br />

being called acting as mediators might be enough. If a pair of spouses had been bickered to the stage of no<br />

other way being picked up than that of divorce, the court would be played as the final mediator. Villagers<br />

wouldn’t go to court on the spur of the moment when they were just falling into a dispute. Otherwise,<br />

especially pertaining to the divorce cases, clients often go to the court for a resolution. Mediators in the<br />

village level will avoid of the dispute as soon as they recognize that a dispute at hand had been so difficult<br />

to be resolved.<br />

In the period as the wife lived in her parents’ family, one side of the couples may initiate to accuse to the<br />

court if she or he was being felt remaining difficult to live together after the various mediations of shuohe.<br />

<strong>The</strong> court will notice another client to prepare his or her reply and then follow a series of court mediation<br />

which is locally called zuo gongzuo (to do work on thought). <strong>The</strong> procedure of zuo gongzuo wouldn’t be<br />

initiated only by the legal institution itself. Popular authorities, such as old men and lineage leaders on<br />

both sides, also a formal mediator of the VMC, would be mobilized to fall into the case, though, not done<br />

in all such cases. <strong>The</strong> place of mediation would be happened in court, in homes of the clients and in an<br />

authorized institution, such as the VMC, etc.<br />

292


If a success was achieved through zuo gongzuo, anything could be fine, the family would be renewed into<br />

a harmony, otherwise, a failure achieved, the most difficult thing for the court was how to identify and then<br />

divide the original personal property of both sides. Although many of fayuan panjueshu (a court letter of<br />

adjudication) would be written down as “One can take away one’s own things,” 8 many cases were faced<br />

the blurred problem of what the meaning of ‘one’s’ is. Several wrong clients in the village conceived that<br />

the final adjudication of the court on property division would have been implied some kind of unfairness.<br />

<strong>The</strong> difficulty the court faced, however, is that there are almost few literal materials kept as evidence to<br />

certify one’s property. It is also obvious that when the husband and wife were being married, there was<br />

no necessary to record one’s property in a written form, or made clear on the division of one’s property.<br />

It is also difficult for a judge that which one of the things should belong to somebody or somebody else<br />

when a pair of couples falling into disputes and went to the court for a divorce. A judge would be often<br />

met some cases that on the female side something, such as ten suits clothes, as dowry would be argued,<br />

but on the male side they replied that there is nothing on the issue proposed by the female side. A dispute<br />

on marriage property, as a result, would be followed at once. A divorce dispute in this sense is resolved in<br />

distinct with other kinds of property dispute.<br />

According to above description of Li village, the establishment of marriage relationship is undergone a<br />

extreme complex process. This process, just as Fei (1981) mentioned, is being of a public displaying rather<br />

than that of a private thing. In other words, the relationship of husband and wife, in their own right and<br />

responsibility, is recognized through the way of the gift exchange. Dowry of a bride is socially required<br />

to be sent in the public. Details of the property would be deeply impressed and easily remembered by<br />

the relatives and villagers of both sides. It is certainly that the property wouldn’t be written down and<br />

prepared as an evidence for the court once the pair of couples was falling into a divorce dispute some day.<br />

<strong>The</strong> adjudication of the court, in contrast, is declared just according to the evidence that can be verified.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is confusing on idea of property. According to the law of the state, a property was approved only as<br />

it could be verified, but transforming of property in a marriage is realized through series of ritual display.<br />

<strong>The</strong> process of property transforming can be seen as an exchange of mutual trust through procedure<br />

of exchange from xiaotie to datie. An exchange of xiaotie witnessed before a matchmaker which is<br />

signified a mutual relationship might be seen as a rough recognition. As the boy and girl have grown up,<br />

8 Many divorce cases, the final adjudication letter will be written the words “One can take away one’s own things.” An<br />

adjudication letter of a divorce case happened in 1950s is recorded as “One can take away one’s own things. Also the<br />

male side should give a set of quilt and the nurture fee of children altogether 16 yuan to the female side in two times, one<br />

of which is on the fifteenth in eighth month of lunar year and another of which the fifth of the fifth month. Eight yuan is<br />

given in each time” (Cited from: <strong>The</strong> Divorce Archives of Zhao County’s Archives Bureau, Vol, 2, July, 1956). This form<br />

of adjudication writing can be found in many the adjudication letter of divorce.<br />

293<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

a datie would be exchanged also before the matchmaker. Eating together of the parents on the both sides<br />

with the matchmaker is necessary. A formal affiliation would be really established and recognized after<br />

the exchange of the datie. Wedding day in harmony and lucky according to the lunar calendar will be<br />

arranged on the male side on which the bride will be taken and before day of which her dowry received.<br />

All of the rites, whether before or on the day of wedding, would be hoped to bind these two alien families<br />

into together and also a new small family could be created. Under the folk mentality, property division,<br />

in those ritual days shouldn’t be mentioned even just in words. <strong>The</strong> bridegroom wouldn’t be asked by the<br />

bride to write down a note to verify “so and so dowry is belonged to the bride herself.” It is obvious that<br />

each one of both sides knows very well which part of the property should be belonged to the male side<br />

and which part to the female. Although a woman is easily to remember and write down all of the terms<br />

as a judge asked her to fill an dowry inventory, it is difficult to her to find a witness to verify all of those<br />

terms was really belonged to her. Nevertheless, the judge is just to declare his adjudication according to<br />

the so-called “verified evidence” (ke chayan de zhengju).<br />

We can learn from a divorce dispute which was happened in 1990 in Li village. <strong>The</strong> plaintiff of this<br />

case is named Shi Yuncai whom was 38 years old in that year. Her own parents’ home is situated in the<br />

Dongzhuang village of Dongzhuang township. Her husband, now was the defendant, is named Feng<br />

Jingshan whom is a villager of Li village. <strong>The</strong> plaintiff sent a request to the local court “to ask for a<br />

permission of divorce with her husband.” Details about her request are that “1) their divorce could be<br />

permitted; 2) they have two boys and two girls and that of which she will bring up the younger boy and<br />

the younger daughter; 3) family property should be equally divided between them; 4) the contracted land<br />

and trees are asked to be equally divided between them.” Many villagers can not understand why the<br />

female side was suddenly proposed to divorce with her husband after their living together for 14 years.<br />

Causes of divorce presented by the plaintiff are included in her own indictment:<br />

<strong>The</strong> defendant married with me in 1978 through formal registration. We have born four children<br />

after our marriage. … After the marriage, our mutual affection is just being general, also the<br />

relationship with my mother-in-law. In the beginning years of our marriage, even I could live<br />

together with the dependant, we afterwards often fall into conflicts just for household chores. It<br />

is therefore led to a deterioration of the relationship with my mother-in-law. <strong>The</strong> defendant acted<br />

upon whatever his mother said and beat and scolded me at every turn. A rift of our affection of<br />

which had been flagged was emerged between us. … I request to divide the above property with<br />

the defendant in equally.<br />

A main reason of this civil case promoted into divorcing is that the existed contradictions between the<br />

wife and her mother-in-law. On the third day of September in 1990, a judge, named Zhao Cunzhi, of local<br />

294


Fanzhuang court received the defendant Feng Jingshan. <strong>The</strong> judge Zhao, according to the procedure of<br />

law, talked about the Article 76 and the Article 77 in the Law of the Civil Legislation to Feng and noticed<br />

Feng that he was asked to write a reply letter and submit it within fifteen days. On fifteenth of October<br />

in 1990, one month and a half month after, the judge Zhao Cunzhi called the defendant Feng Jingshan<br />

and the plaintiff Shi Yuncai to come to the court. <strong>The</strong> reply letter of the defendant hadn’t been submitted<br />

till then, the judge then asked Feng why the letter hadn’t be submitted to the court. Feng replied that his<br />

father-in-law had talked over between them, therefore, he felt no necessary to write the letter and submit.<br />

But the judge stressed that Feng himself gave up his own right of defendant.<br />

<strong>The</strong> judge then talked with both Shi and Feng which is belonged to one part of the court investigation<br />

and testimony. It also can be seen as one part of the court mediation. This mediation was achieved little<br />

success because the wife as a plaintiff still insisted on divorcing with the defendant. Two days after, the<br />

judge Zhao did his second mediation to the Plaintiff Shi. According to the record of local court, mediation<br />

on court had been enacted for three times. A mediation agreement had been finally achieved by the way of<br />

the judge Zhao Cunzhi going to do his persuasion to the families of both sides. Participants doing the work<br />

of mediation are certainly included the family members and the cadres of the village committee on both<br />

sides. Here authority of the formal court does not work singly rather than cooperated with political power<br />

of the state in village and informal authority of the old men of both families. Mediations on marriage<br />

disputes are often realized through the way of zuo gongzuo on both sides. Contradictions between the two<br />

clients are thus at least disappeared in the records of the local court. Both guys express their thankfulness<br />

on the agency of legal authority, i.e. the judge Zhao, whom has been seen as one kind of representative<br />

of formal legal institution of the state. Under the mediation of the authority of the court, an original social<br />

order is though of being recovered which would be embodied in the final mediation of the local court:<br />

Zhao Cunzhi: I have done work on both of you for a long time. I have also gone to your families of<br />

both sides to do work on your old persons. Managers of your villages have also done a lot of work<br />

on both of you. Through the way of mutual understanding on both sides, I will send Yuncai to Li<br />

village on the twentieth-two of this month. I hope you will be kept in mutual love and protection,<br />

mutual tolerant, and mutual understanding. Live better just for thinking about the four children and<br />

your family. It is needed to be mutual tolerant. Congratulate you on your happiness of family. Just<br />

be fine on everything. Would have more you want to say<br />

Shi Yuncai: Thanks for the regards and help of the court on our family. I was really thought of<br />

never being lived and insisted on divorcing with him. I have recognized my faults of previous<br />

thoughts and deeds through the court had done work on us. I will guarantee that we will talk over if<br />

we meet event in the future and never being quarreled each other. We will live a better life for those<br />

four children.<br />

295<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Feng Jingshan: Thanks the court for the regards and help on our family by which a family being in<br />

broken has been recovered. Our family could not exist if the court did not done deep and careful<br />

work on it. Both of us will work in concert in the future to make our life better.<br />

<strong>The</strong> wife in the divorce case had returned her own parent’s family to live more than four months before<br />

the case was sent to the court. <strong>The</strong>re is a similar custom in Li village or near area that a woman often<br />

returned her own parent’s home to live when couples of a family were falling into a crisis. According to<br />

Maurice Freedman’s (1966, 60) literature research on Chinese lineage, the aim of a wife returning home<br />

is just seeking a support from her own parent’s family. Based on my own fieldwork, I thus believe that<br />

one kind of symbolic meaning of a returning wife is given condemnation on the male’s own family, and<br />

in the same time, mediation of the village people will be initiated. One of the families that I visited can be<br />

used as an illustration. A woman returned her own parent’s family to live because of being annoyed with<br />

her husband. A neighbor of her husband then went to visit the husband’s mother and said: “What’s matter?<br />

Let your son say something good to his wife and receive her home!” It is said that many cases of marriage<br />

crisis in the village have been successfully mediated in this way. On the other hand, to the woman that<br />

she wants her family dispute to be resolved on the court, her returning might be useful to avoid of the<br />

disturbance of her husband’s side. It is also convenient in this period to ask a lawyer being in guanxi with<br />

her family by which the final adjudication would be benefit on her own side.<br />

Depending on the whole narration of above case, a process of mediation on a divorce case could be<br />

learned. In the process of mediation, authority of the court as the third party is requested by both of the<br />

plaintiff and defendant. <strong>The</strong>y have certainly different aims according to their different roles. Shi Yuncai,<br />

as a plaintiff, according to her real aim, would not be likely to divorce with the defendant that she might<br />

be just annoyed with her husband’s relatives. For example, she has been obviously annoyed with her<br />

mother-in-law and sister-in-law. But a problem is that those kinds of contradictions are being out of the<br />

scale of the state law. <strong>The</strong> plaintiff has to bring the case to the local court by which a so-called divorce<br />

case can be accepted by the formal legal institute of the state. Three principles followed can be used to<br />

justify her request of divorce: 1) do not recognize her husband’s relative as her relatives; 2) a small family<br />

is important which is just composed of husband, wife and their offspring; 3) property of the family is<br />

either shared by the husband and wife when it is bond together or divided in equally between the husband<br />

and wife when it is fallen into broken. <strong>The</strong> husband as a defendant now tries to maintain the family. He<br />

made a concession to wish his wife coming around to the correct way of thinking. <strong>The</strong> principles applied<br />

to support his justification are followed: 1) family is the most important; 2) property of the family is<br />

shared by husband and wife as it is combined into together and not easy to divide clearly as it is needed<br />

to be distributed. As a third party between the husband and wife, the judge is requested to do mediation<br />

according to the state law. Principles of the mediation can be roughly classified as: 1) It is important to<br />

296


maintain a family; 2) Treatment on a dispute is needed to be reasonable and legally. Here “reasonable”<br />

(heli) is meant customs and “legally” (hefa) is meant abiding by articles of law; 3) If the male didn’t insist<br />

on divorcing, a better way to resolve a dispute would be to maintain the existed marriage.<br />

To maintain a family steady can be seen as a common principle among those different principles abided<br />

by those three kinds of agent. It is also the basis that mediation can be realized. As a representative of legal<br />

authority, the judge would like to use moral persuasion to realize a principle of “a family maintaining is<br />

the most important” by which all those three persons can be falling into a common moral imagination.<br />

Panli (divorce by adjudication)<br />

<strong>The</strong> above mentioned case is successively resolved through court mediation in which principles of the<br />

court are often coincided with ones of custom through which a crisis family can be brought back to life.<br />

But if a divorce case is failed to be mediated, some kind of disagreements and even conflicts between state<br />

law and custom on definition of personal property will be often emerged.<br />

In 1991, the town court received a copy of indictment written by Li Dazhu who is a villager of Li village<br />

asking for reliving the relationship of illegal cohabiting with his wife Yao Shenghua whose parents’ family<br />

is located in Ge Datou village also belonged to the pear area of county Zhao. <strong>The</strong> clients of the divorce<br />

case didn’t register before they cohabited for which just because they hadn’t met the legal age of marriage.<br />

Now I will present the original documents of this case on a process of dissolution. At first, I will cite the<br />

indictment of Li Dazhuang, reply of his wife, and dialogues of the judge with both of them.<br />

Pertaining to the divorce case, many questions asked by the judge are based on a principle of making<br />

a fact clear. Both the plaintiff and the defendant are sought to enlarge their own property belongings as<br />

possible as they can which has been demonstrated in their respective replies. <strong>The</strong> judge Zhang Shunping<br />

talked with the plaintiff Li Dazhu in three times and with the defendant Yao Shenghua in five times. In<br />

addition, the judge himself also went to the village of the plaintiff and of the defendant to take evidence.<br />

He inquired the plaintiff’s father Li Zhenzhong once and also inquired the witnesses Yao Haijun in<br />

Yaojiazhuang village. In the following, I will respectively present the questions asked by the judge and<br />

replay of the clients and witnesses. <strong>The</strong> judge Zhang Shunping talked with Li Dazhu for two times<br />

that one of which was concerned about the background of the plaintiff’s first marriage and the other is<br />

concerned about the question of dowry of the female side.<br />

According to the court dialogue we know that many divorce case are easily transformed into a property<br />

dispute. All of those five dialogues between the judge and Yao Shenghua are concerned about the property<br />

297<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

argument. <strong>The</strong> judge therefore wanted to investigate more clearly what is the dowry of the female side<br />

and their common property. Furthermore, the judge was more concerning about what is the significant<br />

evidence by which those properties of one of the two clients can be adjudicated.<br />

On both sides of the plaintiff and defendant, they tried to marginalize their own interest on property right.<br />

For the end of the marginalization, the common property of their family can be withheld on the male side,<br />

while the story of a color television which was absent in her dowry can also be invented on the female<br />

side. It may be also impossible to the judge trying to find out the legal facts of the belongings of property<br />

right. Although the judge inquired on witnesses, such as the plaintiff’s father, testimony like this is hardly<br />

to weight under the strict legal procedure. It is more difficult to check on how many items of the dowry<br />

are. Finally, the judge had to draw his adjudication according to the facts that could be testified. On the<br />

final decision letter (panjue shu), the judge’s adjudication is written down:<br />

1. To relieve the marriage relationship between the plaintiff and defendant.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong>ir daughter Li Mei will be brought up by the defendant. <strong>The</strong> plaintiff is asked to send<br />

the fostering fee 150 yuan to the defendant before October 1 in every year until Li Mei can<br />

independently live.<br />

3. 1300 yuan bank savings will be equally divided between the plaintiff and the defendant. <strong>The</strong><br />

plaintiff is asked to send 650 yuan to the defendant in the limited 15 days as soon as the decision<br />

letter has been begun in effective.<br />

4. Other disputes are rejected.<br />

According to the decision letter, the judge drawn his adjudication is based on the several basic principles<br />

in the following: 1) Division of property should be based on the testified facts; 2) <strong>The</strong>re is a principle of<br />

equally division on the basis of testified property; 3) <strong>The</strong>ir children should be fostered by both sides; 4)<br />

<strong>The</strong> law is used to care little about the un-testified facts.<br />

Three of the adjudicative principles are especially referred to “the testified facts” (ke chayan de shishi)<br />

which is a concept of jurisprudence. It is also a main characteristic of modern law that the authoritative<br />

judge drawn his adjudication on the evidences and facts provided by the plaintiff and the defendant. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

is obviously a significant inconsistence of idea between the popular society and the state on what is meant<br />

on a legal fact. As coming from rural area, a plaintiff or a defendant often says some property is belonged<br />

to one of them but they can not always provide their own evidence to support their claim. As a result, they<br />

had to accept a final adjudication decided by an authoritative local court. Although some persons wanted<br />

to express their un-satisfactions on the adjudication and tried to appeal to a higher court, i.e. a city court,<br />

they often received a reply of “<strong>The</strong> original adjudication is maintained” (weichi yuanpan). On the one<br />

298


hand, a city court would like to give sufficient respects on the adjudication of a local court by which a<br />

harmony relationship between them could be maintained, on the other hand, they would like to do weichi<br />

yuanpan just because of a practical difficult on testifying the concrete legal facts. <strong>The</strong>y have to hurry<br />

through their adjudication or maintain the original adjudication which is thought of the best way of saving<br />

either on energy or on time.<br />

Some wrong cases will be unavoidable in the rural area because the testified fact requested by the legal<br />

adjudication is often uneasy to find out in a civil case. For the seeking of more benefit from the testified<br />

facts, a relational network existed in a popular society will be consequently embedded into the operation<br />

of a legal institution. In Li village, I had met a middle man whose name is called Li Ruiyun that he wanted<br />

to sell his own building to appeal to the county court. We have had a dialogue each other:<br />

<strong>The</strong> author: Why do you try to sell your building?<br />

Ruiyun: Don’t you need money to appeal? It is needed to send gift. Money is nothing. It would be<br />

really face losing if the appeal was failed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> author: Could the appeal be won if the gift was sent?<br />

Ruiyun: Don’t you think that they wouldn’t help to say something for us after we had sent a gift?<br />

<strong>The</strong> author: Are there many cases that appeal to the court through the way of sending a gift?<br />

Ruiyun: You feel no confidence if you haven’t send a gift.<br />

<strong>The</strong> author: If both sides have sent their own gift, how about you?<br />

Ruiyun: Competing on whose gifts being more and whose relational person being more important.<br />

<strong>The</strong> above interview has been given me an impressive image. Many likewise responds will be happened<br />

if you have chance to interview with clients of cases especially those of divorce cases. It is obviously<br />

difficult to find out a fact especially a legal fact. To do it is often needed to invest many human labors or<br />

materials that may be not easy to a local court. Many legal cases have been presented and demonstrated<br />

that judges of local courts are not easy to draw their own adjudication independent of clients otherwise<br />

they will be regulated and bounded by the local economics and social relationships (He 1995, 255-61). As<br />

a result, judges would like to drive a light carriage on a familiar road, only could reach their adjudications<br />

in bias. <strong>The</strong> state law has a whole set of abstract knowledge system in which the meaning of private<br />

property is clearly defined that an evidence is needed as it met a concrete case to verify some property<br />

belonged to him. Once it couldn’t be testified, the bias of a judge would be emerged.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Customarily, belongings of a private property is often seen as a clear event at lest in a village community,<br />

299<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

especially on that of dowry which has always been ritually displayed in the community. When a man<br />

prepares his marriage, he is often needed to construct a new house and purchase some new furniture. He<br />

will prepare his wedding after the house has been finished. On the last day of the wedding day, the family<br />

on the female side will send the dowries to the bridegroom’s village. Those dowries will be moved from<br />

a tractor into the bridal bedroom which, in generally, will be done by the people of the bride’s family.<br />

All of these activities could be observed and witnessed by the village people. It is no necessary to write<br />

down a property list that on which whose property is declared. In other words, a written contract of dowry<br />

belongings is obviously unnecessary for the village people.<br />

Once a pair of couples couldn’t live together anymore, the dowry as property of a wife must be taken<br />

away and anyone else wouldn’t disagree on it. This kind of property right agreed in customary ideas and<br />

functioned in a rural community has never been effective after the same case has been appealed to a local<br />

court where evidence is necessary. <strong>The</strong>re would be no trouble if both sides abided by the custom. Once<br />

the custom, however, has been offended by someone of them, belongings of a property would be often in<br />

confusing. Divorce cases, therefore, are the trouble one from a court’s point of view that for them is not<br />

easy to reach a fair adjudication. <strong>The</strong>y had finally avoided the problem of property distribution or insisted<br />

on the administrative procedure of “the testified evidence” which, in some occasions, can be abused by a<br />

judge as a power resource through which some persons being in a near relation with the judge could be<br />

benefited.<br />

We can clearly see conflicts between the court which is a representative of the state law and the custom<br />

which is functioned in a popular society. As a judge reached his own adjudication, he would like to follow<br />

a principle that the legal fact is asked to present as clearer and simpler as possible. But the property<br />

relationship in a popular society is often various that which couldn’t be reduced to a clear legal fact<br />

without confusing. It is also seen as a best example of proverb that “Even a clear officer (qingguan)<br />

couldn’t resolve household affairs” (qingguan nanduan jiawushi).<br />

References<br />

Dong, Jiaqiu, 1995, A Study on History of Marriage in Ancient China. (Zhong Guo Gu Dai Hun Yin Shi<br />

Yan Jiu.) Guangzhou: Guangdong People’s Publishing.<br />

Fei, Xiaotong, 1981, Institutions of Reproduction. Tianjin: Tianjin People’s Publishing.<br />

Freedman, Maurice, 1966, Chinese Lineage and Society: Fukien and Kwangtung. London: Athlone Press.<br />

He, Weifang, 1995, “A social justice through the judicature—a perspective on the present situation of<br />

the Chinese judges.” (tongguo sifa shixian shehui zhengyi) In Yong Xia, ed., Towards the Age of<br />

Rights—A Study of Civil Rights Development in China(zouxiang quanli de shidai). pp. 209-84.<br />

300


Beijing: <strong>The</strong> University Press of Chinese Politics and Law.<br />

Leach, E. R, 1954, Political Systems of Highland Burma: A Study of Kachin Social Structure. London:<br />

<strong>The</strong> Athlone Press.<br />

Radcliffe-Brown, A. R., 1926, “Father, Mother, and Child” Man Nos. 103, pp. 159-161.<br />

Tai, Yen-hui, 1978, “Divorce in traditional Chinese Law,” in In David C. Buxbaum, ed., Chinese Family<br />

Law and Social Change in Historical and Comparative Perspective. pp. 75-108, Seattle and London:<br />

University of Washington Press.<br />

Tao, Xisheng, 1934, Marriage and Lineage. (Hun Yin Yu Jia Zu). Shanghai: Commerical Press.<br />

Tao, Yi, and Ming, Xin, 1994, A Institutional History of Chinese Marriage and Family. (Zhong Guo Hun<br />

Yin Jia Ting Zhi Du Shi). Beijing: <strong>The</strong> East Publisher.<br />

301<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Difficult Dialogues: Perpetrators, Victims, Power, and the Legacies<br />

of Mass Violence<br />

Henry C. <strong>The</strong>riault<br />

Worcester State University<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>The</strong> foundation of my previous work on perpetrator-victim relations in the long-term aftermath of<br />

genocide has been the assertion that any process addressing a case of mass violence that focuses on<br />

improved contemporary relations between the two parties is doomed to fail if it does not address (1)<br />

the actual impact on the victim group, in material, social, familial, and other dimensions and (2) the<br />

sharp power imbalance between perpetrator group and victim survivor group that results from the broad<br />

destructiveness of genocide for the victim group and the economic, political, demographic, social, identity,<br />

and other benefits for the perpetrator group. 1 This is not to say that tensions will not be reduced, but they<br />

will be reduced in ways that extend and even intensify the harms to the victim group and the benefits to<br />

the perpetrator group.<br />

My approach has been to examine typical conflict resolution models based on perpetrator-victim dialogue<br />

as they have been applied to particular cases, especially the 1915 Armenian Genocide, 2 and to show<br />

why these do not resolve the legacy of the case of mass violence, when ‘resolution’ is defined in a way<br />

that takes account of the needs and rights of the victims in a fair way. Based on this, I have argued that<br />

reparations are necessary to resolve the legacy of mass violence in a proper manner.<br />

My critique of the usual approaches to perpetrator-victim dialogue raises the question of what features<br />

1 <strong>The</strong>riault, Henry C., “From Unfair to Shared Burden: <strong>The</strong> Armenian Genocide’s Outstanding Damage and the Complexi-<br />

<strong>The</strong>riault, Henry C., “From Unfair to Shared Burden: <strong>The</strong> Armenian Genocide’s Outstanding Damage and the Complexities<br />

of Repair,” <strong>The</strong> Armenian Review (forthcoming).<br />

2 <strong>The</strong> Armenian Genocide should be understood as part of a broader Ottoman Turkish Genocide of Greeks, Assyrians, and<br />

Armenians from 1914 into the 1920s. <strong>The</strong> focus of my work on dialogue and reparations has been on the Armenian aspect<br />

of this overarching genocidal process, so I refer here to the Armenian Genocide specifically.<br />

302


dialogue must have to be a productive part of a resolution of the legacy of a case of mass violence, but<br />

I have not taken up this issue in previous work. <strong>The</strong> question is perhaps crucial, as dialogue might be a<br />

necessary if not sufficient element of any resolution, because any resolution imposed without genuine<br />

perpetrator group participation and acceptance is bound to be unstable.<br />

Conflict Resolution’s Failure to Resolve<br />

I will begin by explaining the general argument I have used to challenge standard conflict resolution<br />

models as they have been applied to past mass violence and oppression. 3 <strong>The</strong>se models typically focus on<br />

changing attitudes among both perpetrators and victims in order to eliminate or minimize the tensions that<br />

authors employing the model hold result from these attitudes. Though this is not necessarily stated, the<br />

attitudes are considered conceptual or discursive (linguistic) in the sense not merely that they are expressed<br />

in mental processes or words but that this is their essential nature. Such models thus hold that, despite the<br />

material reality of past violence or oppression, subsequent attitudes and expressions are separable from<br />

the prior violence or oppression and can be treated in isolation. On this view, the reason there are tensions<br />

between former victims and perpetrators is not because of the material process of violence and oppression,<br />

but because both groups maintain and express attitudes that negatively characterize the other group.<br />

<strong>The</strong> solution offered by such models is to change those attitudes and expressions so that they no longer<br />

cause tensions. Sometimes the model calls for beginning with changes to the expressions to try to impact<br />

underlying attitudes, sometimes with the attitudes as the apparent ‘root causes.’ Either way, the process is<br />

supposed to lead to a reduction or elimination of tensions and a ‘reconciliation’ of former perpetrators and<br />

victims.<br />

My critique is this. Changes at the discursive or conceptual level leave intact what is on the material level.<br />

But genocide, slavery, mass rape, and other mass violence or oppression are quite material. That is not to<br />

say that they do not have conceptual or discursive elements that are essential to the processes of violence<br />

or oppression. Certainly they do, as ideological frameworks, propagandistic manipulation, and so forth<br />

play significant roles in many if not all cases. But the effects of discourse and concept are real deaths,<br />

rapes, torture, expropriations of labor and property, and destruction of familial and community relations.<br />

It is through the operation of concrete force and power that attitudes and statements have the real effects<br />

they do. <strong>The</strong>y do not emerge ex nihilo (out of nothing), but themselves are produced through concrete<br />

social and political forces and interactions. And, these material impacts themselves structure the long-term<br />

subsequent relationship of perpetrator and victim groups.<br />

3 <strong>The</strong>riault, op. cit.<br />

303<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

An exclusive focus only on the conceptual and discursive level does not alter significantly the material<br />

level. In other words, changing attitudes and eliciting positive statements by each group about the other<br />

does not alter the effects of the violence or oppression, such as the impoverishment of the victims and<br />

enrichment of the perpetrators; the demographic, political, and identity frailty of victims and the security<br />

of perpetrators; the level of trauma suffered by victim group members even of later generations; etc. It<br />

does not alter the relationship of domination that is the outcome of mass violence or long-term oppression.<br />

For instance, it is common to view the end of the direct killing phase of genocide as the end or suspension<br />

of the perpetrator-victim group relationship, as a cutoff that ends the material impact of perpetrators on<br />

victims. But what genocide does, quite the contrary, is put into effect a hyper-domination relation. If most<br />

genocide takes place in a context in which the perpetrator group had a pre-existing dominance over the<br />

victim group, the genocide is not a rupture that breaks the domination relation but rather its maximization<br />

or totalization. And, if nothing is done to address that extreme dominance relation, it remains intact far<br />

into the future. In fact, over time, the dominance increases, as the power of the perpetrator group over the<br />

victims becomes the basis for yet further increases in power, with the resulting greater power imbalance<br />

serving as the basis for another increase, and so on perpetually if no balancing forces are applied or come<br />

into play. 4<br />

What is more, conceptual and discursive adjustments do not alter the underlying commitments of<br />

perpetrator group members. Even if self-perceived attitudes might change, if a perpetrator group is not<br />

willing to offer meaningful reparations to the victim group, then this betrays a willingness to benefit<br />

from mass violence or oppression and, in essence, anything ranging from at the very least a culpable<br />

if thoughtless complicity in the violence or oppression to tacit agreement with the view that the victim<br />

group is in fact a fit target of violence or oppression. While members of the perpetrator group might<br />

espouse a view opposed to violence against or oppression of members of the victim group and genuinely<br />

feel that they are opposed to it, this feeling can coexist with a mental framework in which such a feeling<br />

is sufficient to resolve the case of mass violence or oppression, so the perpetrator group has no further<br />

obligation to the victims. It can coexist with a normalized, implicitly-held sense of hierarchy in which the<br />

‘neutral’ position is one in which the perpetrator group dominates the victim group, even though to most<br />

perpetrator group members, even progressives, this dominance relation appears to be an equal relationship.<br />

Either or both frameworks in turn can cause perpetrator group members to reject justice claims by victim<br />

group members for reparations – and even to condemn victim group members as self-interested, unfair, or<br />

4 <strong>The</strong>se forces, it should be pointed out, might not be intended to address the past violence or oppression; but could be, for<br />

instance, an economic crisis in the perpetrator society, a crisis that is quite independent of any relationship with the victims<br />

or history of violence or oppression, yet which decreases the relative power of the perpetrator group vis-à-vis the victim<br />

group.<br />

304


aggressive when they advocate for such things 5 – thus creating an ethical hierarchy or dominance relation<br />

of some or most members of the perpetrator group over some or many members of the victim group that<br />

parallels the concrete dominance relation that was produced or exacerbated by the original mass violence<br />

or oppression. In all of this, the positive attitude on the surface masks a deeper commitment to hierarchy<br />

over victims, a commitment of which perpetrators themselves might not be aware.<br />

I have pointed out the two things that this approach misses. First, material impacts persist through time<br />

and actually become in time causal forces themselves, unless or until they are mitigated directly. Thus,<br />

the impoverishment of victims is not only a result of, say, slavery, but even long after slavery has ended<br />

persists and causes further problems for the victims, keeping them in a lower political position, say,<br />

than the progeny of the master group. Second, the result of any mass violence or oppression is a deep<br />

dominance relation – differential power and status – that persists even if a situation of formal equality is<br />

established in the aftermath.<br />

A typical conflict resolution model should never be applied to a case of asymmetrical violence or<br />

oppression. A conflict resolution model assumes a mutual conflict that is driven more or less equally by<br />

both sides, which are locked in a more or less balanced antagonism. When this kind of model is applied to<br />

a situation of power asymmetry, it actually obscures the real structure of the (dominance) relationship.<br />

It should be noted that both insights are based on intellectual lineages in the humanities. Various rejections<br />

of idealism or a privilege of the mental over the material have emerged in the history of philosophy,<br />

particularly Western philosophy, culminating perhaps in Marx’s critique of what he viewed as Hegel’s<br />

‘one-sided’ privileging of the abstract over the concrete. 6 While Marx’s understanding of oppression<br />

is embedded in economic and sociological work, it was a philosophical insight into the relationship of<br />

the mental and material that grounded this work. Similarly, theorizations of power differentials hidden<br />

within apparently egalitarian or neutral structures reach high points with J. S. Mill, 7 Franz Fanon, 8 and<br />

Michel Foucault. 9 Mill identified the potential for domination within democratic structures, while Fanon<br />

presciently analyzed colonial domination to identify ways in which it would persist in the post-colonial era<br />

5 Ibid.<br />

6 See Karl Marx, “Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844,” trans. Martin Milligan, in <strong>The</strong> Marx-Engels Reader,<br />

2 nd ed., ed. Robert C. Tucker (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1978), 107-108, 110-25; and Marx, “<strong>The</strong> German<br />

Ideology,” trans. and ed. P. Ryazanskaya, in <strong>The</strong> Marx-Engels Reader, 2 nd ed., ed. Robert C. Tucker (New York: W. W.<br />

Norton & Company, 1978), p. 175.<br />

7 John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, ed. Elizabeth Rapaport (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1978).<br />

8 Frantz Fanon, <strong>The</strong> Wretched of the Earth, trans. Constance Farrington (New York: Grove, 1991).<br />

9 Michel Foucault, “Right of Death and Power over Life,” in <strong>The</strong> History of Sexuality: An Introduction, trans. Robert Hurley,<br />

vol. 1 of <strong>The</strong> History of Sexuality (New York: Vintage, 1990), pp. 135-59.<br />

305<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

and Foucault revolutionized the concept of power as a structuring framework rather than an institutional<br />

or individual possession. Also from a philosophical perspective, Marilyn Frye developed a definition<br />

of and analysis of oppression that extends Foucault’s critique of hidden power structures and adds key<br />

insights into the way in which structural power functions in apparently innocuous direct interactions<br />

and relations between members of the dominant and dominated group. 10 Finally, Edward Said analyzed<br />

the role of misrepresentations of ‘orientals’ in modern imperialism and charted out the ways in which<br />

misrepresentations reinforced and supported imperialism as well as reflecting an imperial order in the<br />

colonial and post-colonial eras. 11<br />

Of a number of responses to arguments for reparations in cases of mass violence or oppression, one<br />

is particularly relevant here. <strong>The</strong> objection is often made that even advocacy, let alone attainment, of<br />

reparations will actually be counter-productive and foster increased rather than decreased tensions<br />

between the victim and perpetrator groups. Particularly in cases of long-past violence or oppression<br />

(say, Native American genocides or slavery, respectively, in the United States), later generations in the<br />

perpetrator group – many of whose own historical origins mean that their families were not even in the<br />

United States when the violence or oppression was perpetrated – feel that any imposition of responsibility<br />

on them is unfair. While it is beyond the scope of this paper to discuss in full this feature of the objection<br />

or respond to the complex issues it raises, suffice it to say that ‘responsibility’ is different from ‘blame.’<br />

<strong>The</strong> latter depends on actually having participated in violence or oppression, while the former can derive<br />

from a much less direct connection to past events, including benefiting materially, socially, politically, etc.,<br />

from that violence (for instance, financial benefits from an economy whose wealth is traced in part to slave<br />

labor in the past, use of land depopulated through genocide, etc.), denial that the past harms were done<br />

despite presentation of adequate evidence, or even voluntary celebration of the identity of the perpetrator<br />

group. 12 In this sense, ‘responsibility’ does not mean responsibility for the actual long-past harm in the<br />

sense of blame, but rather responsibility to address the impacts of that past harm in the present and future.<br />

10 Marilyn Frye, “Oppression,” in<br />

Marilyn Frye, “Oppression,” in <strong>The</strong> Politics of Reality: Essays in Feminist <strong>The</strong>ory (Freedom, CA: Crossing Press,<br />

1983), pp. 1-16, and Frye, “Sexism,” in <strong>The</strong> Politics of Reality, pp. 17-40.<br />

11 Edward W. Said,<br />

Edward W. Said, Orientalism (New York: Vintage, 1979).<br />

12 See Karen Kovach, “Genocide and the Moral Agency of Ethnic Groups,” in<br />

See Karen Kovach, “Genocide and the Moral Agency of Ethnic Groups,” in Genocide’s Aftermath: Responsibility and<br />

Repair, ed. Claudia Card and Armen T. Marsoobian (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2007), pp. 50-70; Armen T. Marsoobian,<br />

“Acknowledging Intergenerational Moral Responsibility in the Aftermath of Genocide,” Genocide Studies and Prevention<br />

4, no. 2 (2009): pp. 211-20; and <strong>The</strong>riault et al., “Resolution With Justice: Reparations for the Armenian Genocide –<br />

<strong>The</strong> Report of the Armenian Genocide Reparations Study Group,” draft, September 2012, p. 50, pp. 55-56, pp. 65-75.<br />

306


Justice and Peace<br />

Despite the strength of arguments for responsibility, the potential backlash by perpetrator group members<br />

is treated as a neutral factor, rather than something for which members of the perpetrator group have<br />

moral responsibility. As a result, the usual response in political as well as academic circles is to determine<br />

what will minimize the tension, rather than to assign responsibility for it. This generally leads to the view<br />

that ‘justice’ and ‘reconciliation’ (‘peace’) are in tension and any increase in justice – for instance, by<br />

compensating the victim group for expropriated property – results in an increased tension, so the only<br />

way to achieve a reduction in tensions toward ‘reconciliation’ is to set aside entirely or in part the dictates<br />

of justice. For a recent case of mass violence or recently ended form of oppression (say, Apartheid),<br />

this could mean setting aside prosecution of key perpetrators; for a long-past case of mass violence or<br />

oppression, this could mean blocking reparations.<br />

In this context, it is essential to define the term ‘justice.’ <strong>The</strong>re are many available concepts of justice<br />

discussed in reference to mass violence and oppression. Because this paper concerns long-past cases of<br />

mass violence and oppression, criminal justice is not a necessary component. In many cases – genocide<br />

of Native North Americans, United States slavery, the Tasmanian Genocide, the Herero Genocide,<br />

the Armenian Genocide, etc. – the major perpetrators most responsible are no longer living and thus<br />

cannot be punished. Even where some major perpetrators might be living, as in the case of the Comfort<br />

Women system, Holocaust, Cambodia Genocide, East Timor Genocide, Guatemala Genocide, Jim Crow<br />

discrimination in the United States, United States’ war crimes in Vietnam, Apartheid in South Africa, etc.<br />

– criminal prosecutions in themselves are inadequate for addressing the harms done to individual victims<br />

and the victim groups more broadly. Thus, criminal prosecutions might be part of an overall justice<br />

process, but will not be sufficient to meet the requirements of justice.<br />

Similarly, the concept ‘healing’ in the sense of removing the pain of past violence or past or present<br />

oppression is not possible even across multiple generations, because the effects of the harms continue<br />

permanently, but this does not mean that the psychological and material situations of victim groups cannot<br />

be improved. This does not occur naturally with the mere passage of time, which on the contrary tends<br />

to exacerbate the effects of mass violence or oppression (genocide victim groups lose their identity, fade<br />

demographically, etc.; denied economic reparations, formerly enslaved groups become poorer over time;<br />

and so on).<br />

For past mass violence and oppression, three elements appear necessary. First, the resolution must respect<br />

the rights of the victims. For instance, victims who were forced from land or lost land through illegitimate<br />

actions by the perpetrators (passage of unfair laws, fraud that was allowed by the government, etc.) should<br />

307<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

have their land restored to them. This works symbolically as well. For instance, a recent court ruling in<br />

Argentina has recognized what has been labeled a ‘right to truth’ for members of victim groups. 13 Second,<br />

the resolution should be fair, in the sense that perpetrators should not be allowed to benefit from past mass<br />

violence or oppression. A member of the perpetrator group in possession of a business expropriated from a<br />

member of the victim group should be required to restore that business to the member of the victim group<br />

or, if that person is no longer living, a family member or common institution of the victim group. This also<br />

works symbolically: the correct history should be disseminated by the perpetrator group to ensure that the<br />

truth will be recognized and the harm done to the victim group understood – as in the case of the Comfort<br />

Women, Japanese school textbooks should include a description of this atrocity that is historically accurate<br />

and makes clear its ethical and legal unacceptability.<br />

Third, the needs of the victims arising out of their victimization must be addressed. <strong>The</strong> harms were<br />

done by the perpetrator group and the perpetrator group has a responsibility for addressing what victim<br />

group members need that they would not need if they had not been victimized. For instance, elderly<br />

Comfort Women experiencing physical suffering from the brutality, enforced drug addiction, harmful<br />

medical ‘treatment,’ and so forth often need extensive medical care. <strong>The</strong> Japanese government should<br />

be responsible for meeting the needs of victims that arise directly from their victimizations. This applies<br />

psychologically (symbolically) as well. In the same example, many Comfort Women have faced denial<br />

by the Japanese government and those supporting it of the facts of what was done to them, have been<br />

characterized as voluntary prostitutes by deniers, have been stigmatized in their own societies, and so<br />

forth. For vindication, the Japanese government should officially recognize and apologize for the full<br />

range of harms done to the Comfort Women. It should make clear that Japan and not the Comfort Women<br />

was responsible for what happened and that what happened was categorically wrong. Indeed, Japan bears<br />

responsibility for educating its own citizens as well as those in other countries about mass sexual violence<br />

and supporting a change in attitudes toward women and girls who are victimized by it.<br />

Kibibi Tyehimba has argued that any resolution that sets aside the reparative process called for by the<br />

dictates of justice actually leaves intact the prejudicial attitudes that the resolution is supposed to address,<br />

simply hiding them from view. As soon as victim group members advocate for their rights, the same<br />

attitudes and forces that resulted in harms in the past will be triggered in the perpetrator population. 14<br />

Indeed, I would extend this point to assert that setting aside justice concerns because of fear of a backlash<br />

13 “Turkey Slams Argentine Court Ruling on Genocide,”<br />

“Turkey Slams Argentine Court Ruling on Genocide,” Asbarez, 4 April 2011, http://asbarez.com/94660/94660/ (accessed<br />

October 15, 2012).<br />

14 Kibibi Tyehimba, “<br />

Kibibi Tyehimba, “Reparations as Justice” (remarks presented at the “Armenians and the Left” symposium, City University<br />

of New York Graduate Center, April 2006).<br />

308


from the perpetrator group actually reinforces the power of the perpetrator group over the victim group<br />

and extends the original harm. After all, it turns a refusal to accept responsibility by perpetrator group<br />

members into a veto over those advocating for victim group rights and needs.<br />

This suggests a deeper problem with the very concept of ‘resolution’ that is often employed in discussions<br />

of past violence or oppression. <strong>The</strong> goal of conflict resolution strategies is self-evidently the reduction of<br />

conflict, especially where that conflict is manifested as physical violence, discrimination, etc. Most conflict<br />

resolution approaches assume that a reduction in rhetorically-expressed animosity or concrete behaviors<br />

and actions harming the other group is the goal of the conflict resolution process. <strong>The</strong>y typically focus on<br />

rhetoric and attitudes. But changed rhetoric and attitudes can obscure persistence of the same harms of<br />

past violence or oppression and the domination/subjugation produced or exacerbated by it. <strong>The</strong>se surface<br />

changes can act as a cover, in fact, for increasing domination and harm. This is true of perpetrator rhetoric,<br />

for instance, that expressed regret over the past while the perpetrator group’s court system rejects any and<br />

all claims for compensation for past injuries. It is also true in the reverse sense for victim group members.<br />

After a long period of struggle against denial of the truth of what their group experienced (Armenian<br />

Genocide denial and denial of the Comfort Women atrocity are obvious examples), an accommodation<br />

with members of the perpetrator group that can be labeled a ‘resolution’ might be embraced by weary<br />

victim group members or might be accepted as the best that can be hoped for in the face of perpetrator<br />

group intransigence. In such a context, the expectations of victim group members have already been<br />

reduced due to the force and manipulation inherent in the hierarchy in which they engage the perpetrator<br />

group. At the very least, when the situation of domination by the perpetrator group has been normalized<br />

and victim group members have come to expect denigration, denial, ill-treatment, lack of basic rights,<br />

and so on, a reduction in any of that might appear to be positive progress and to warrant the satisfaction,<br />

contentment, or something similar on the part of victim group members. In sum, the subjective feeling<br />

that the relationship with perpetrator group members has improved does not indicate that the resolution of<br />

past violence or oppression is accomplished by what has produced the subjective feeling. That subjective<br />

feeling might coexist with preserved or heightened domination of and loss by the victim group. <strong>The</strong><br />

‘resolution’ in this case will guarantee power of the perpetrator group and the ineffectiveness of the victim<br />

group.<br />

A resolution must not simply result in lowered tensions but must transform the context of those tensions<br />

as well. For instance, it should mitigate the power imbalance of the perpetrator and victim groups by<br />

requiring that the perpetrator group give up material advantages derived from the past violence or<br />

oppression. <strong>The</strong> subjective satisfaction of victim group members might, of course, reflect genuine strides<br />

toward a resolution, but all positive changes in the subjective experience of victim-perpetrator relations<br />

should be tested against the context in which they occur. If domination and injustice are still persistent<br />

309<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

despite the subjective view that relations are positive, it is the material reality that determines when an<br />

actual resolution has been achieved.<br />

One approach to prevent the minimizing of justice in favor of a reduction of tensions between the victim<br />

and perpetrator groups has been to impose a minimum threshold on any resolution process between<br />

victims and perpetrators, such that justice requirements cannot be lowered below a certain level even if<br />

not doing so will preserve some level of tension between the victims and perpetrators. Amy Gutman and<br />

Dennis Thompson, for instance, have applied this approach to truth commissions that can include such<br />

things as the offering of prosecutorial amnesty. 15 <strong>The</strong> problem, however, is that this line of argument still<br />

accepts that the requirements of justice and of improvement in the perpetrator-victim relationship are in<br />

tension. Is this necessarily the case? And, if it is, is any stable and just resolution of a past case of mass<br />

violence or oppression possible?<br />

<strong>The</strong> answers to these questions might be seen to depend on whether the rehabilitation of perpetrator<br />

groups is possible. If it is, then it would appear that some process might at once allow justice to be given<br />

to the victim group while tensions would not be increased but instead reduced, as perpetrator group<br />

members exorcise from their political, military, cultural, social, and/or religious institutions, practices, and<br />

structures the attitudes, behaviors, hierarchies, and so forth put into place through mass violence against<br />

or oppression of the victim group or embedded features that drove the past mass violence or oppression<br />

and the entrenchment of which was reinforced by the fact that there was no accountability for that mass<br />

violence or oppression.<br />

It is unlikely that an externally-imposed resolution will contribute to the rehabilitation of the perpetrator<br />

group. As Hegel explained, the imposition of an external order on a given society is bound to fail; only<br />

an order that develops from the society itself will properly fit it. 16 Thus, not only is an externally-imposed<br />

resolution of a case of mass violence or oppression likely to provoke a backlash from the perpetrator<br />

group, but such a resolution might not actually fit the perpetrator group correctly. That is, it might not<br />

address the issues in the perpetrator group that need to be addressed. Only a process of internal change<br />

that is accepted by the perpetrator group can move the perpetrator group away from prejudice against and<br />

dominational tendencies toward the victim group.<br />

Jermaine McCalpin has emphasized this point in his contribution to the Armenian Genocide Reparations<br />

15 Amy Gutman and Dennis Thompson, “<strong>The</strong> Moral Foundations of Truth Commissions,” in Truth v. Justice: <strong>The</strong> Morality<br />

of Truth Commissions, ed. Robert I. Rotberg and Dennis Thompson (Princeton: Princeton, 2000), pp. 22-44.<br />

16 G. W. F. Hegel, <strong>The</strong> Philosophy of Right, trans. T. M. Knox (New York: Oxford, 1967), pp. 178-79.<br />

310


Study Group’s forthcoming report. 17 According to him, the way to achieve this kind of perpetrator<br />

group transformation is through a ‘truth and reparations commission.’ He explains the importance of<br />

participation of members of the perpetrator group on the commission, which should consist of perpetrator<br />

group members, victim group members, and third-party members to ensure balance. Given the fact that<br />

any resolution of the Armenian Genocide must take place in the context of an aggressive, well-funded<br />

official governmental denial campaign, McCalpin argues that, unlike the previous Turkish-Armenian<br />

Reconciliation Commission, this new commission should take as its beginning point that the Armenian<br />

Genocide occurred and have as its charge determining what the appropriate response by the perpetrator<br />

group today should be.<br />

While this is a legitimate stipulation for the commission and thus a necessary condition that must be met<br />

if it is to have the salutary effects it is intended to, the question remains open as to how the perpetrator<br />

group will be moved to engage in such a process. It would seem that, if the process is entirely voluntary<br />

and the perpetrator group enters into it, it will already have been rehabilitated to the point where it accepts<br />

responsibility for the past and is committed to discharging its responsibility, while if it has not already<br />

been rehabilitated, it will not enter into a ‘truth and reparation’ process to begin with. It would seem that<br />

we are back to the problem of the mutual exclusiveness of justice and the reduction of tensions.<br />

In previous work, I have argued that the giving of reparations will demonstrate that a perpetrator group<br />

has undergone a transformation. Reparations are the result of a transformation, but I did not theorize the<br />

method of transformation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> problem is not solved by a perpetrator group-victim group dialogue approach that is supposed to<br />

foster an evolution of thinking by participants. Such a dialogue process is in essence a negotiation between<br />

unequal parties. Unless the power imbalance is countered, any negotiative process will tend to preserve<br />

that power imbalance. In the dialogue process, victim group members are in the position of attempting<br />

to change the status quo, which is the normalization of the results of mass violence and oppression. A<br />

just result typically requires dramatic changes. <strong>The</strong> perpetrator group is in the position of accepting or<br />

rejecting all requests or demands of the victim group. Thus, the very process of dialogue in the post-mass<br />

violence or post-oppression context gives an advantage to the perpetrator group, an advantage reinforced<br />

by the dominant position they are in generally. Even if a perpetrator group makes some concessions to the<br />

victim group that moves the situation a few steps closer to a fair outcome for the victims, it still controls<br />

how far toward such an outcome the process is allowed to move. In practice, the process never moves<br />

17 <strong>The</strong>riault, “Resolution With Justice,” pp. 77-89.<br />

311<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

very far. Indeed, the imbalance of power between the two groups can allow the perpetrator group to use<br />

the dialogue process to extend its advantages and benefits, so that a dialogue process that is supposed to<br />

produce a better situation in effect extends the original harm by perpetrators to the victim group. 18 Thus,<br />

for a dialogue process to succeed, it would seem to have to start with a rehabilitated perpetrator group, but<br />

the point of a dialogue process is that it is supposed to bring about perpetrator (as well as victim) group<br />

transformation starting from a state of entrenched opposition between the groups.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Path Forward<br />

<strong>The</strong> putative opposition between justice and stable resolution discussed above can be regarded as turning<br />

on the external-internal dichotomy. In a context in which the post-mass violence or post-oppression<br />

situation is taken as the natural or neutral status quo at least from the perpetrator perspective, any<br />

change in that status quo requires external force or coercion. But, a stable outcome is only possible if the<br />

perpetrator group members in general voluntarily accept the outcome, and this is typically possible only if<br />

the perpetrator group has a full role in the deliberation or process leading to that outcome; since the post-<br />

violence or post-oppression status quo is taken as neutral, however, the perpetrator group is unlikely to (in<br />

practice, virtually never does) accept substantive change to the status quo under such circumstances. It is<br />

not just that the process cannot be externally-driven if it is to succeed, but any internal process will tend<br />

toward a very different outcome from any external process. Thus, an internal process is highly unlikely to<br />

produce – and in practice would seem never to produce – a just outcome. Is there any way forward?<br />

Despite Hegel’s view that only an internally-driven, organically-developed process can transform a given<br />

society, his predecessor Rousseau recognized the challenge of a purely immanent construction of ethical,<br />

political, and legal structures and attitudes. For Rousseau, the process of ethical, political, and legal<br />

development could not come out of nothing: there needed to be some kind of originary force to begin it.<br />

Rousseau developed the notion of an external “law-giver” who would lay down the basic social contract<br />

to form a political unit. 19 Martin Thom suggests the possibility that Rousseau did not have in mind a<br />

particular individual as the law-giver, but used the concept as a sort of short-hand for social groups. 20<br />

Either way, the essence of the concept is that an external originary force is required to organize a society<br />

because the internal tools are not sufficient.<br />

This notion can be extended and applied to the question of perpetrator-victim group relations and<br />

18 <strong>The</strong>riault, From Unfair to Shared Burden.<br />

19 Thom, Martin,<br />

Thom, Martin, Republics, Nations and Tribes (New York: Verso, 1995), pp. 69-72.<br />

20 Ibid., p. 70.<br />

312


esolutions. Various forms of external pressure have been attempted to effect change in perpetrator-victim<br />

relations for long-past mass violence or oppression. <strong>The</strong>se include the passage by other governments<br />

(usually at the national level, but sometimes from international organizations or of sub-national governing<br />

bodies) of resolutions calling for recognition and atonement by the perpetrator government. Typically<br />

outside pressure has been viewed as a hindrance for intergroup conciliation, because of the backlash that<br />

often comes from the perpetrator group. 21<br />

In addition to the problem of what ‘conciliation’ should mean in such a context, as discussed above, there<br />

is another issue. <strong>The</strong> backlash concern treats all perpetrator group members alike and ignores the tensions<br />

and complexities within it. <strong>The</strong> result is a situation in which any proposed resolution must satisfy the most<br />

extreme members of the perpetrator group to achieve a genuine reduction or elimination of perpetrator-<br />

victim tensions. Dialogue processes taking this as their goal therefore often focus on these most extreme<br />

members of the perpetrator group and ignore other more moderate and even highly progressive members.<br />

<strong>The</strong> extreme members are in effect given veto power over any attempt at progress in intergroup relations.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y are the least likely to change their views and so the effort to help them transition to more positive<br />

attitudes is usually futile. Yet, by their refusal to overcome their prejudices and dominating position, they<br />

stop progress between the perpetrator and victim groups. An excellent example of this is the Turkish-<br />

Armenian Reconciliation Commission. 22<br />

While outside pressure might trigger extreme elements of the perpetrator group and alienate more<br />

moderate members who are not willing to confront their historical responsibilities directly, not challenging<br />

such people does not fix the problem but merely hides it from view while the attitudes and resistance of<br />

such perpetrator group members continue to prevent progress. What is more, for those who are resistant<br />

but at some level committed to progress, this kind of pressure can trigger critical re-evaluation of societal<br />

attitudes, practices, and institutions and thus progress. Perhaps more importantly, external pressure of<br />

this sort can provide support to those within the perpetrator group who are pushing for transformative<br />

rehabilitation away from the violence or oppression of the past, toward an improved situation for the<br />

victim group and better relations with the perpetrator group. It is important to recognize that perpetrator<br />

groups are not monolithic, but members exhibit an array of viewpoints and ethical commitments. Those<br />

pushing for positive change are typically active as resistance during the historical mass violence or<br />

21 Taner Akam, “Is <strong>The</strong>re Any Solution Other Than a Dialogue” in<br />

Taner Akam, “Is <strong>The</strong>re Any Solution Other Than a Dialogue” in Dialogue Across an International Divide: Essays Towards<br />

a Turkish-Armenian Dialogue (Toronto: Zoryan Institute, 2001), pp. 13-14; and David Phillips, Unsilencing the<br />

Past: Track Two Diplomacy and Turkish-Armenian Reconciliation (New York: Berghahn, 2005), pp. 27-36.<br />

22 For a comprehensive, though apologetic, history of the Turkish-Armenian Reconciliation Commission that confi rms this<br />

For a comprehensive, though apologetic, history of the Turkish-Armenian Reconciliation Commission that confirms this<br />

point, see Phillips.<br />

313<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

oppression, as ‘righteous gentiles’ who saved Jews from the Holocaust, abolitionist white Americans<br />

who fought against United States slavery, and so on. And, they exist just as much in the long aftermath of<br />

violence or oppression.<br />

Rehabilitation of the perpetrator group does not require altering each person within the group, but on the<br />

contrary reworking the power dynamics within the group so that those committed to responsible relations<br />

with the victim group can lead the society toward them. While some within a society in this kind of<br />

transition will resist such changes, this should not be generalized to all members of that society. External<br />

pressure is not opposed by the perpetrator group in general, but rather only a segment, while the pressure<br />

actually supports another segment. <strong>The</strong> apparent opposition between ‘justice’ and ‘reduction of tensions’<br />

thus turns out to be a misunderstanding of the situation based on essentialization of the perpetrator<br />

group, that is, viewing the perpetrator group as a homogenous identity group in which the attitudes and<br />

behaviors of all members line up in parallel, rather than as a complex of individuals and subgroups with<br />

varying attitudes, agendas, and ethical and political commitments. Even more than just being consistent<br />

with the change progressives in a perpetrator group pursue, external pressure is a support for the internal<br />

transformation they seek. What begins as external becomes internal.<br />

<strong>The</strong> inverse is true for victim groups in typical dialogue or truth commission processes. Given the<br />

assumption that pursuit of justice by victims group members hinders elimination or reduction of tensions<br />

with the perpetrator group, those organizing a dialogue or truth commission process typically exclude or<br />

marginalize those in the victim community who pursue justice claims, that is, those who are perceived as<br />

more extreme than others in the victim group. This is an imposition of power over the victim group, to the<br />

point of determining who its legitimate spokespeople are, and reflects an overarching tendency of at least<br />

some progressive as well as denialist members of the perpetrator group to assert control over the discourse<br />

on the past violence or oppression in what might be characterized as a normalized imperialist attitude. 23<br />

Balancing the power of the perpetrator group over the victim group in a dialogue or truth commission<br />

process starts with giving up this control and inviting various voices from the victim group in without<br />

interfering in the internal dynamics of the victim group – except to mitigate the effects of prior interference<br />

practiced during long-term oppression. As suggested above, it also includes breaking the power of<br />

reactionaries as well as resistant moderates to allow other representatives of the perpetrator group their<br />

proper role. Internal pressure can also be mounted by those committed to rehabilitation by pushing or<br />

compelling resistant members of the perpetrator group to comply with the requirements of the process.<br />

23 <strong>The</strong>riault, From Unfair to Shared Burden.<br />

314


For instance, progressive white South Africans could have worked to push Afrikaner ex-President Botha<br />

to appear before the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission instead of allowing him to<br />

ignore the subpoena. 24 External moral pressure is very helpful in such circumstances, among other reasons<br />

because it can affect members of the perpetrator group who are not ideologically committed to domination<br />

of the victim group. Yet, the process is internally-driven to the extent that the perpetrator group ‘polices’<br />

itself and progressives prevent extremists from the perpetrator group from exercising power over victims.<br />

Another means of balancing perpetrator power is to challenge the tendency prevalent among progressive<br />

members of perpetrator groups to equate extremist positions within the perpetrator group – for instance,<br />

denying that a genocide occurred, that enslavement was cruel, etc., or rationalizing the violence or<br />

oppression by appeal to historical relativism (everyone did similar things in that age) – with strong<br />

positions in the victim group. Thus, Armenian ‘nationalists’ advocating reparations for the Armenian<br />

Genocide are equated with Turkish ultra-nationalists denying that the genocide occurred or considering<br />

it justified. This equation is possible only through the prism of differential power. In reality, in this case,<br />

while Armenian nationalism is far from perfect, they are generally a response to centuries of pre-Genocide<br />

oppression and the experience of largely accomplished annihilation. <strong>The</strong>y should be understood as<br />

attempts to advocate for and defend a victim group the future viability of which a past genocide has made<br />

uncertain. Concerns about Turkish ultra-nationalism should not be automatically applied to Armenian<br />

nationalism; that is, Armenian political activists and advocates should not be demonized or punished<br />

because of the genocidal nature of some extremist Turkish nationalism. 25<br />

This plays out in other ways as well. <strong>The</strong>re has been a tendency in recent years to misuse the term ‘trauma’<br />

to apply to any kind of psychological bad feeling resulting from an external force or event. This has even<br />

been extended to attribution of trauma to perpetrators of violence or oppression based on their experience<br />

of victimizing others. While it might be true that perpetrators or oppressors suffer in some sense, this is not<br />

to be equated or even related to what victims suffer due to unjust harm done to them, and the term ‘trauma’<br />

in a technical sense does not apply to what perpetrators experience. 26 Care has to be taken to ensure that<br />

the term ‘trauma’ is only applied to actual cases of trauma in a clinical sense.<br />

24 Gilbert A. Lewthwaite, “Nation Seeks Truth from Aging Symbol – South Africa: P. W. Botha Has Answers about Apart-<br />

Gilbert A. Lewthwaite, “Nation Seeks Truth from Aging Symbol – South Africa: P. W. Botha Has Answers about Apartheid-era<br />

Atrocities, but He Doesn’t Want to Give <strong>The</strong>m,” <strong>The</strong> Baltimore Sun, 8 June 1998, http://articles.baltimoresun.<br />

com/1998-06-08/news/1998159011_1_apartheid-botha-truth-commission (accessed October 15, 2012).<br />

25 <strong>The</strong>riault, “Reparative Justice and Alleviating the Consequences of Genocide,” in<br />

<strong>The</strong>riault, “Reparative Justice and Alleviating the Consequences of Genocide,” in <strong>The</strong> Armenian Genocide and International<br />

Law, ed. Antranig Dakessian (forthcoming).<br />

26 <strong>The</strong>riault, “Against the Grain: Critical Refl ections on the State and Future of Genocide Scholarship,”<br />

<strong>The</strong>riault, “Against the Grain: Critical Reflections on the State and Future of Genocide Scholarship,” Genocide Studies<br />

and Prevention 7, no. 1 (2012): pp. 131-32.<br />

315<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

<strong>The</strong> granting of material and symbolic reparations can also be built into the dialogue or truth commission<br />

process. With each reparative step, the legitimacy of victim claims and needs becomes more and more<br />

established for members of the perpetrator group. This supports increasing progress in group relations.<br />

Conclusion<br />

This paper has argued that progress in perpetrator-victim group relations depends on structuring a<br />

dialogue or truth commission process in such a way that the deep disparity in power is balanced. This in<br />

turn depends on an inclusive approach to both the perpetrator and victim groups, bringing into the process<br />

participants typically marginalized in it. <strong>The</strong> question, ‘Who should be listened to?’ is a crucial one in<br />

this context. Especially important one is external support for those in the perpetrator group who advocate<br />

rehabilitation. This ensures that the process is an internal one from the perpetrator group perspective. In<br />

this way, the dictates of justice do not have to be externally enforced, but in fact become consistent with<br />

the hoped-for conciliation.<br />

References<br />

Akam, Taner. “Is <strong>The</strong>re Any Solution Other Than a Dialogue” In Dialogue Across an International<br />

Divide: Essays Towards a Turkish-Armenian Dialogue. Toronto: Zoryan Institute, 2001.<br />

Fanon, Franz. <strong>The</strong> Wretched of the Earth. Translated by Constance Farrington. New York: Grove, 1991.<br />

Foucault, Michel. “Right of Death and Power over Life.” In <strong>The</strong> History of Sexuality: An Introduction.<br />

Translated by Robert Hurley. Vol. 1 of <strong>The</strong> History of Sexuality. New York: Vintage, 1990.<br />

Frye, Marilyn. “Oppression.” In <strong>The</strong> Politics of Reality: Essays in Feminist <strong>The</strong>ory. Freedom, CA:<br />

Crossing Press, 1983.<br />

__________. “Sexism.” In <strong>The</strong> Politics of Reality: Essays in Feminist <strong>The</strong>ory. Freedom, CA: Crossing<br />

Press, 1983.<br />

Hegel, G. W. F. <strong>The</strong> Philosophy of Right. Translated by T. M. Knox. New York: Oxford, 1967.<br />

Kovach, Kovach. “Genocide and the Moral Agency of Ethnic Groups.” In Genocide’s Aftermath:<br />

Responsibility and Repair. Edited by Claudia Card and Armen T. Marsoobian. Malden, MA:<br />

Blackwell, 2007.<br />

Lewthwaite, Gilbert A. “Nation Seeks Truth from Aging Symbol – South Africa: P. W. Botha Has<br />

Answers about Apartheid-era Atrocities, but He Doesn’t Want to Give <strong>The</strong>m.” <strong>The</strong> Baltimore Sun, 8<br />

June 1998, http://articles.baltimoresun.com/1998-06-08/news/1998159011_1_apartheid-botha-truth-<br />

commission (accessed October 15, 2012).<br />

Marsoobian, Armen T. “Acknowledging Intergenerational Moral Responsibility in the Aftermath of<br />

Genocide.” Genocide Studies and Prevention 4, no. 2, 2009, 211-20.<br />

316


Marx, Karl. “Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844.” Translated by Martin Milligan. In <strong>The</strong><br />

Marx-Engels Reader. 2 nd ed. Edited by Robert C. Tucker. New York: W. W. Norton and Company,<br />

1978.<br />

Marx, Karl. “<strong>The</strong> German Ideology.” Translated and edited by S. Ryazanskaya. In <strong>The</strong> Marx-Engels<br />

Reader. 2 nd ed. Edited by Robert C. Tucker. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 1978.<br />

Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. Edited by Elizabeth Rapaport. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1978.<br />

Phillips, David. Unsilencing the Past: Track Two Diplomacy and Turkish-Armenian Reconciliation. New<br />

York: Berghahn, 2005.<br />

Said, Edward W. Orientalism. New York: Vintage, 1979.<br />

<strong>The</strong>riault, Henry C. “Against the Grain: Critical Reflections on the State and Future of Genocide<br />

Scholarship.” Genocide Studies and Prevention 7, no. 1, 2012, 123-44.<br />

__________. “From Unfair to Shared Burden: <strong>The</strong> Armenian Genocide’s Outstanding Damage and the<br />

Complexities of Repair.” <strong>The</strong> Armenian Review. Forthcoming.<br />

__________. “Reparative Justice and Alleviating the Consequences of Genocide.” In <strong>The</strong> Armenian<br />

Genocide and International Law. Edited by Antranik Dakessian. Forthcoming.<br />

<strong>The</strong>riault, Henry C., Alfred de Zayas, Jermaine O. McCalpin, and Ara Papian. “Resolution With Justice:<br />

Reparations for the Armenian Genocide – <strong>The</strong> Report of the Armenian Genocide Reparations Study<br />

Group,” draft, September 2012.<br />

Thom, Martin. Republics, Nations and Tribes. New York: Verso, 1995.<br />

“Turkey Slams Argentine Court Ruling on Genocide.” Asbarez. 4 April 2011. http://asbarez.<br />

com/94660/94660/ (accessed October 15, 2012).<br />

Tyehimba, Kibibi. “Reparations as Justice.” Remarks presented at the “Armenians and the Left”<br />

symposium, City University of New York Graduate Center, April 2006.<br />

317<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Parallel Session 1-3<br />

Healing Practices in the <strong>Humanities</strong><br />

1. Healing Words: Philosophy in the Treatment of Mental Illness<br />

/ Peter B. Raabe (University of the Fraser Valley)<br />

2. Instances of Philosophical Counseling and Byzantine Philosophy<br />

/ Shlomit C. Schuster (Center Sophon)<br />

3. Healing Practices in the <strong>Humanities</strong><br />

/ Kayama Rika (Rikkyo University)<br />

4. Healing Practices in the <strong>Humanities</strong>: A Search in Progress<br />

/ Jeanette Fourie (Lyndi Fourie Foundation)


Healing Words: Philosophy in the Treatment of Mental Illness<br />

Peter B. Raabe<br />

University of the Fraser Valley<br />

Why do I teach philosophy to students who will become professional psychiatrists, psychoanalysts,<br />

psychotherapists, clinical psychologists, counsellors, and social workers?<br />

My counselling practice has advanced far beyond dealing with simple issues such as helping someone<br />

decide which one of two job-offers to accept. I’m dealing with clients who have been patients of<br />

psychoanalysts and psychotherapists, people who have been diagnosed with serious mental illnesses that<br />

have had a significant impact on their lives.<br />

When I tell others about how I treat these so-called mentally ill people with philosophy I’m always<br />

met with disbelief. <strong>The</strong> assumption is that either, I’m lying and I’m probably applying a more medical<br />

methodology—one that is more psychological, or more scientific than philosophy. Or it is assumed that<br />

the so-called mentally ill person wasn’t mentally ill at all—they must have been misdiagnosed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> first time Samantha came into my office she looked like she had been crying. Sam told me she was in<br />

her early 40’s and still single. She began her story by saying she lacked meaning in her life. She wanted<br />

to know what the meaning of life is. That’s why she had come to me, knowing that “philosophers talk<br />

about that kind of stuff.” She told me she had lost several close friends to cancer over the past year or<br />

so. She said she had been working at a dead-end job then found herself a better job, only to have to deal<br />

with dishonest employees who were stealing from the company. After finding and quitting several more<br />

minimum wage jobs she decided to open a small business with a friend. But the friend fell in love and<br />

abandoned her by leaving the country with her new boyfriend, leaving Sam with enormous bills to pay<br />

off all by herself. She said she had been able to deal with all of this and keep smiling until her favourite<br />

aunt, whom she had been very close to, died unexpectedly. Sam said that her deceased uncle had been<br />

abusive to her aunt, and had sexually molested Samantha when she was a child. She said when her poor<br />

321<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

aunt died she was no longer able to be happy. She was struggling with taking a course at university but<br />

couldn’t see the point of it any longer. Her medical doctor diagnosed her as clinically depressed and put<br />

her on anti-depressant medication. But the drugs didn’t help and Sam tried to commit suicide not long<br />

before she came to see me. I asked her what had prevented her from killing herself. She said she felt her<br />

death would be too hard on the few people who still cared for her. She had voluntarily admitted herself<br />

into a psychiatric ward, and was put on more medications. <strong>The</strong> clinical psychiatrist assigned to her case<br />

pronounced her “too stressed out to get anywhere” and simply gave up trying to help her other than by<br />

giving her prescription drugs.<br />

Is it true that philosophy can help someone who has been diagnosed as mentally ill? <strong>The</strong> answer to this<br />

question depends on how ‘mental illness’ is defined. Before it can be decided which treatment modality<br />

is best in dealing with mental illness it’s necessary to establish what is actually meant by the term ‘mental<br />

illness’. But even before that can be established it’s necessary to first of all determine what exactly is<br />

meant when there is talk of ‘the mind’.<br />

1. Mind and Brain<br />

It is not possible to go into a detailed discussion of the various theories that have been put forward on how<br />

to define the mind and the brain in this short essay. Suffice it to say that generally, in the mental healthcare<br />

literature there is great confusion as to whether the mind and the brain are two things or one, and whether<br />

they are in fact even different ‘things.’ In most of the mental healthcare literature the two terms are used as<br />

though they were synonymous. For example, throughout his book Philosophy of Pharmacology professor<br />

of psychiatry Dan J. Stein uses the term “brain-mind” to indicate that they are not separate entities, and<br />

without ever defining exactly what he means by “mind.” 1 But in his book <strong>The</strong> Mind and its Discontents<br />

Grant Gillett gives a very effective definition of what the mind is all about. He writes,<br />

A mental life is a narrative construct or product of the integrating activity of a concept-using<br />

subject as a person in relation to others…. Thus, acting and relating are the foundations of the<br />

psyche rather than merely receiving, assembling, and connecting representations. 2<br />

What Gillett means is that the words ‘mental’ or ‘mind’ don’t refer to any concrete objects, such as<br />

neurons or ganglia in the brain. Instead they refer to the person’s ‘narrative’ non-material elements such<br />

as beliefs, values, and assumptions that we have as individuals and which we share with others. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

1 Stein, Dan J. Philosophy of Pharmacology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.<br />

2 Gillett, Grant. <strong>The</strong> Mind and its Discontents (2 nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, p. 138.<br />

322


propositional mental elements define each person as a unique individual among others. <strong>The</strong> brain is<br />

universal to all living creatures, but each creature does its own thinking and therefore has a unique mind of<br />

its own. <strong>The</strong> brain is the container; the mind is the content. It is much easier to change your mind than to<br />

change your brain! Whenever there is talk of a mental illness what is actually being referred to is problems<br />

in the content that is the mind.<br />

In philosophical counselling we don’t deal with the so-called medical model of psychopathology: “the<br />

physical or chemical lesions interfering with the information processing function of biological systems.” 3<br />

Our work involves the ‘semiotic being’ —the person for whom meaning matters—and the thoughts which<br />

generate the emotional domain of that human being. <strong>The</strong> person’s beliefs, values, and assumptions are the<br />

fertile mental ground from which feelings emerge, and within which problems sometimes develop. For<br />

example, a person might believe that his wife is being unfaithful. He has based this belief on the fact that<br />

she has been absent from home on a number of evenings. (<strong>The</strong> truth is that she has been secretly spending<br />

money from the household budget to attend a weight-loss group, but is reluctant to tell her husband about<br />

it). When he asks her where she has been in the evenings, she is evasive and makes up a story he knows<br />

is not true. <strong>The</strong> husband now has the justified but false belief that his wife is cheating on him. This can<br />

create feelings in him of sadness, hopelessness, low self-esteem and so on. His situation has created what<br />

psychology refers to as ‘cognitive dissonance’— a troubling conflict of beliefs, values, and assumptions.<br />

False or troublesome beliefs which are not resolved can become so powerful that the suffering individual<br />

may in time stop enjoying living a ‘normal’ life. This then can lead to the diagnosis of any number of so-<br />

called mental illnesses, such as depression.<br />

<strong>The</strong> second time we met Samantha was worried about the stigma of having been a mental patient. She<br />

said psychiatry and the pill approach to her problem had not been helpful. She knew that meaning and<br />

happiness can’t be found in a pill. But she admitted that it had helped her to feel better just having a<br />

couple of weeks’ rest in that psychiatric hospital bed. She felt frustrated at having to work at a dead<br />

end job and not being able to get past the feeling of being overwhelmed by sadness and emptiness. She<br />

also said she was surprised by the fact that I—a philosopher—was talking with her about her ordinary<br />

everyday problems. She had been expecting me to bring up “grander philosophical issues.” I told her that<br />

personal problems are always connected with the grander philosophical issues. But it’s difficult, if not<br />

impossible, to focus on a theoretical discussion of the grander issues when personal problems are causing<br />

pain. She said that, given all the bad stuff that has happened in her life, she decided that maybe the best<br />

approach would be to “just accept” things, to just give in. We talked about a lot of negative things that had<br />

3 Nature and Narrative: an introduction to the new philosophy of psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003,<br />

p. 120.<br />

323<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

already happened to her in the past, and I tried to have her see that much of it was what others had done<br />

to her, and was really no fault of her own. She agreed that for most of her life she had been defined by<br />

others, and that she was expected to be the person whose happiness was often sacrificed for the benefit of<br />

others. In philosophy this is called a utilitarian approach—where it’s acceptable to sacrifice the happiness<br />

of one person for the benefit of others. But philosophers know that the theory of utilitarianism only seems<br />

reasonable when you’re not the one being sacrificed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> following week she phoned me, crying, to tell me she wouldn’t be coming to our scheduled session<br />

the next day. She said she was scared of talking about bad things. I assured her we didn’t have to talk<br />

about anything she didn’t want to. Philosophical counselling doesn’t require us to walk down any dark<br />

emotional paths we would rather avoid. She said that while part of her feels that there’s nothing good<br />

about her, deep down in her heart she believes she’s actually a decent person. I told her that she definitely<br />

seemed like a good person to me, but that events and other people in her life have led her to doubt herself.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n she told me she had decided to reduce her medications, and wondered if this might be what’s causing<br />

her to feel so sad. I told her that when people reduce their anti-depressant medications the withdrawal<br />

symptoms can bring on all sorts of strange emotions, and it’s likely that some of what she’s feeling are just<br />

the drugs not wanting to let go of her. She eventually calmed down and agreed to come to the next day’s<br />

session.<br />

Our discussion the next day was about trust. She had been abused by her uncle as a child; in her early<br />

teens she had been grabbed off the street and sexually molested by a stranger; in high school a teacher<br />

had made inappropriate advances to her and two other girls. Later her boyfriend of many years became<br />

drunk, belligerent, and violent with her. <strong>The</strong> therapist she had trusted suddenly moved away to a foreign<br />

country without first telling her. Her friend and her favourite aunt died, thereby also abandoning her. She<br />

said she used to be a very giving person, but couldn’t be that way any more because so many people had<br />

taken advantage of her. Her father demanded she share the burden of caring for the family. Her mother<br />

had come to depend on her to be the care taker of her younger siblings, as well as being the strong one<br />

she could lean on for emotional support. And while she had been doing her best her mother had expected<br />

better of her. I couldn’t resist asking her, ‘what it means to do better than your best?’ Of course there is<br />

no answer to this question. Samantha had grown weary of the heavy burden she was carrying. She had<br />

collapsed under the weight, and was now guilt ridden for no longer being able to continue. Sadness and<br />

hopelessness seemed to be the only emotions she could find in herself in response to the misery that had<br />

been her difficult life thus far.<br />

324


2. Mental Illness: Cause and Effect<br />

A mental illness is not a biological problem with the physical brain. It is a problem with a person’s mental<br />

narrative: a mistaken belief, a misguided assumption, or confused perception, etc. <strong>The</strong> mental illness that<br />

is referred to as depression is the result of problems in reasoning: such as, for example, a man’s justified<br />

but mistaken belief that his wife is being unfaithful. <strong>The</strong> cause of the depression is not at all a so-called<br />

chemical imbalance in the physical brain. That would be a mistaken causal assumption. But it would also<br />

be a mistaken causal assumption to say that the man’s depression causes him to have feelings of sadness,<br />

hopelessness, and low self-esteem.<br />

Depression doesn’t cause anything. <strong>The</strong> word ‘depression’ is a diagnostic label that always only refers<br />

to a collection of symptoms, never a cause. Below are two diagrams to illustrate the difference between<br />

a cause and a collection of symptoms which lead to a diagnosis. <strong>The</strong> first one shows how the effect —<br />

influenza — is often mistakenly cited as being the cause of the various symptoms.<br />

Influenza does not cause a headache, fever, and coughing. A virus causes those symptoms. <strong>The</strong> symptoms<br />

in combination are labelled ‘influenza’ or ‘the flu’. Medication can be given to alleviate the symptoms, the<br />

headache, fever, and coughing. But in order to heal the body when a harmful virus attacks, medication<br />

must be given which fights the virus itself and not just the symptoms. <strong>The</strong> second illustration shows how<br />

the effect — depression — is often mistakenly cited as being the cause of the various symptoms.<br />

325<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Depression does not cause sadness, hopelessness, or low self-esteem. Life problems, such as the husband’s<br />

belief that his wife is cheating on him, cause those symptoms which are then labelled ‘depression’.<br />

Biologic psychiatry makes two critical errors in defining mental illness. First, it takes a realist attitude to<br />

mental illness. It assumes that the mind and mental functions are reducible to the operations of the brain.<br />

It reduces mental illnesses to disordered molecular or cellular structures in the brain. Realist biological<br />

models of mental function and mental illness locate the pathological qualities of psychological conditions<br />

in the material properties of brains, not in the symbolic systems or propositional content which constitutes<br />

the mind. 4<br />

<strong>The</strong> second mistake is that biological psychiatry reifies mental illness by defining symptom-based<br />

diagnoses as ‘quasi-disease’ entities. But a symptom, or even a cluster of symptoms, is not an objective<br />

natural entity. That would be like saying that a belief (such as that one’s wife is cheating) is a material<br />

object.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ontology of mental illnesses then is founded on two misconceptions: that the mind is the same as<br />

the brain, and that the diagnosis of a mental illness is identical to the discovery of an organic disease.<br />

Neither of these perspectives is justified. In North America a mental illness is entered into diagnostic<br />

manuals and into professional practice, not by empirical biomedical research, but by a majority vote of the<br />

editorial committee which compiles and publishes the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and<br />

Statistical Manual of Mental Illness (DSM). 5<br />

What is the ontological status of a mental illness such as depression when that mental illness is simply a<br />

label applied to a collection of symptoms? <strong>The</strong> answer is, it has no material existence in reality at all, no<br />

ontological status whatsoever. <strong>The</strong> classification of mental illnesses is the result of what has been called<br />

“insidious reification” which refers to the conceptual creation of disease entities and treating them as<br />

though they actually have a substantive existence. 6 <strong>The</strong> various symptoms in combination — sadness,<br />

hopelessness, and low self-esteem — are reified and discussed as if this distress were a unified illness or<br />

disease known as ‘depression.’<br />

4 Horowitz, p. 143, 3.<br />

5 For a detailed discussion of how a collection of symptoms are given the status of a mental illness, see Psychiatric Diagnosis<br />

and Classification. Mario Maj et al. editors. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, 2002.<br />

6 See a discussion of this issue in the book, Essential Philosophy of Psychiatry by Tim Thornton. Oxford: Oxford University<br />

Press, 2007, p. 180-181.<br />

326


Medication can be prescribed to alleviate these symptoms, but these pharmaceuticals don’t eliminate<br />

the cause of depression: the individual’s various life problems that have become difficult to deal with. In<br />

order to actually ‘heal’ the mind when serious distress arises — that is, in order to alleviate the suffering<br />

and distress — something must be done to help the sufferer think through and resolve the problematic life<br />

issues that are the real cause.<br />

<strong>The</strong> words ‘mental’ and ‘illness’ make a peculiar combination. It’s odd to speak of ‘mental illness’ as<br />

some sort of existing entity because the term ‘mental illness’ refers simply to problematic or confused<br />

thinking. No one would think to use the term ‘thought illness’ or ‘belief illness’. <strong>The</strong> word ‘illness’ is<br />

totally inappropriate when it’s associated with thoughts or beliefs. And yet that’s exactly what ‘mental<br />

illness’ refers to: problematic thoughts and beliefs. That’s why philosophy is so very helpful in dealing<br />

with mental illnesses: because philosophy is very good at dealing with problematic thoughts and beliefs.<br />

But what about so-called ‘more serious’ mental illnesses? Surely philosophy isn’t up to the task of helping<br />

someone with a ‘serious’ mental illness, is it?<br />

In the next few sessions Samantha and I discussed whether she was at fault for the many terrible things<br />

that had happened to her in her life. We worked at changing the depression she was experiencing into<br />

something more like justified anger at those individuals who had treated her so badly or expected too<br />

much from her.<br />

In our fifth session Sam mentioned how silly she felt for having asked in our first session if we could talk<br />

about the meaning of life. I told her people often start their conversations with me like that, and that it’s<br />

a legitimate question in philosophy. But we both knew that there were more important personal issues to<br />

deal with first in Sam’s life. So she asked me if suicide is ever justified. This led to a long discussion about<br />

why people commit suicide. What we found is that there are many reasons. Sam felt in her case it seemed<br />

like she had been afraid of losing herself. She had felt like she was being shredded. Other people had<br />

taken pieces of her; they had defined her in many different ways without allowing her to be herself; and<br />

they had left her feeling empty and undeserving of herself. She found it difficult to put into words—what<br />

it feels like to lose yourself. But I told her I understood what she was saying: her attempted suicide was<br />

not her desire to end her life, but her attempt to hang onto the little bit of herself that was still left. For her,<br />

suicide was a way to save her own life. This discovery by the two of us put her attempted suicide into a<br />

totally different light, one that allowed her to finally stop feeling guilty for trying to be herself.<br />

We also discussed her feelings of guilt for spending money on buying some music CD’s. She said she<br />

felt guilty for not having used the money to care for others. I mentioned that the famous philosopher<br />

Immanuel Kant argued that it’s not only imperative to care for others but it’s also necessary to care for<br />

327<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

oneself. We agreed that it just makes logical sense: if you don’t look after yourself, how can you care for<br />

others? Samantha’s questions about her own religious beliefs surrounding a woman’s caring role in the<br />

Christian family took us well into those deeper philosophical issues she had wondered about earlier: the<br />

definition of evil, the nature of sin, and even the nature of God. We also discussed whether it’s ever right<br />

to stick to your own values when they conflict with those of the rest of the family.<br />

3. Why I Teach Philosophy to <strong>The</strong>rapists and Counselors<br />

<strong>The</strong> idea that philosophy can be helpful to people in a very practical sense is not a new concept. For<br />

example, more than two thousand years ago the pre-Socratic philosopher Epicurus characterized<br />

philosophy as therapy of the soul or mind. He maintained that the arguments made by philosophers are<br />

just meaningless if they don’t relieve any real human suffering. 7 In 45 BC writing about how people<br />

should learn to deal with their own mental distress, Cicero wrote in his Tusulanae Disputationes<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is, I assure you, a medical art for the soul (mind). It is philosophy, whose aid need not be<br />

sought, as in bodily diseases, from outside of ourselves. We must endeavour with all our resources<br />

and all our strength to become capable of doctoring ourselves.” 8<br />

<strong>The</strong>n around the beginning of the Christian Era Seneca wrote in his letter to Lucilius,<br />

Shall I tell you what philosophy holds out to humanity Counsel. One person is facing death;<br />

another is vexed by poverty... All mankind are stretching out their hands to you on every side.<br />

Lives have been ruined, lives that are on the way to ruin are appealing for some help; it is to you<br />

(philosophers) that they look for hope and assistance. 9<br />

In her book titled <strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy of Desire, Martha Nussbaum examines three major schools of philosophy<br />

in the early Greek times. She finds that the Epicureans, the Stoics, and the Skeptics were all concerned<br />

with the practice of “compassionate ‘medical’ philosophy” 10 —that is, philosophy applied to the<br />

alleviation of human mental suffering.<br />

7 Text 124. Porphyry “To Marcella.” 31 (221U). In <strong>The</strong> Epicurus Reader. Brad Inwood and L. P. Gerson trans. (Cambridge:<br />

Hackett, 1994.)<br />

8 Quoted in Martha C. Nussbaum. <strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy of Desire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP. 1994, p. 14.<br />

9 Quoted in Hadot, Pierre. Philosophy as a Way of Life. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.<br />

10 Ibid., Nussbaum, p. 40.<br />

328


<strong>The</strong> early psychoanalysts also saw the value of philosophy, although not in its academic form. In his 1942<br />

introductory address at the Conference for Psychology in Zurich, Switzerland, Carl Jung told his audience,<br />

I can hardly draw a veil over the fact that we psychotherapists ought really to be philosophers or<br />

philosophic doctors—or rather we already are so, though we are unwilling to admit it because of<br />

the glaring contrast between our work and what passes for philosophy in the universities. 11<br />

Freud 12 references Plato when describing dream work. 13 Psychotherapist Albert Ellis, the originator<br />

of Rational Emotive Behavior <strong>The</strong>rapy (REBT) in the early 1950’s, employs the sort of critical<br />

and creative thinking strategies found in informal logic courses that are now part of any college or<br />

university philosophy department’s undergraduate curriculum. 14 Ellis points out that “much of the<br />

field of psychotherapy always has been and still is admittedly philosophic” and that his own approach<br />

“stems directly from philosophic positions—particularly the outlooks of Epictetus and the ancient<br />

stoics, and of the phenomenalists, existentialists, and pragmatists.” 15 Psychoanalysts such as Rollo May<br />

were routinely using philosophical techniques and ideas as a part of the counselling process as early<br />

as 1953. 16 May appeals to Descartes, Mill, Kafka, Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Sartre as he describes<br />

his therapeutic method as one in which the client comes to a “consciousness of self-identity.” Erich<br />

Fromm 17 uses Marx and Hegel as a springboard to an understanding of the human condition, sick<br />

individuals, and sick societies. In another work he appeals to Aquinas and Spinoza to reinforce his<br />

perspective on human struggles and human desire. 18 R. D. Laing references Sartre, Heidegger 19 and<br />

Kierkegaard 20 as he explains how human sorrow is the result of “the creation of a false self” rather than<br />

living authentically.<br />

Other contemporary psychiatrists have also argued more recently that continental phenomenology is<br />

11 Jung, Carl G. (1957) “Psychotherapy and a Philosophy of Life.” In Essays on Contemporary Events. R. F. C. Hull,<br />

trans. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press. 1989 ed., p. 45.<br />

12 Freud, Sigmund. General Introduction to Psychoanalysis. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1975. p. 153.<br />

13 This information is adapted from the essay “Philosophical Counselling: An Almost Alternative Paradigm” by Sara Waller<br />

in Philosophy in the Contemporary <strong>World</strong>. Vol 10, No. 2.<br />

14 Ellis, Albert. Handbook of Rational Emotive <strong>The</strong>rapy. Albert Ellis and R. Grier eds. New York: Springer, 1977.<br />

15 Ellis, Albert. “Philosophy and Rational-Emotive <strong>The</strong>rapy.” Counseling and Values. Donald Biggs et al, eds. Washington:<br />

American Personnel and Guidance Association, 1976, p. 49, 50.<br />

16 May, Rollo. Man’s Search for Himself. New York: Dell Publishing, 1953.<br />

17 Fromm, Erich. Beyond the Chains of Illusion. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1962.<br />

18 Fromm, Erich To Have or to Be. New York: Harper and Row, 1976.<br />

19 Laing, R.D. Self and Others. New York: Viking Penguin, 1990.<br />

20 Laing, R.D. <strong>The</strong> Divided Self. New York: Viking Penguin, 1990.<br />

329<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

essential to psychiatry and ought to be part of any training curriculum. 21 What does all this philosophy do<br />

for the suffering individual?<br />

In counselling one of the functions of the philosophical counsellor is giving suffering individuals the<br />

thinking or reasoning tools they may not already possess that will help them alleviate their distress. This<br />

is where the process of intentional teaching comes in which goes beyond the immediate problem solving<br />

effort. Albert Einstein once wisely said that you can’t solve a problem by using the same thinking that got<br />

you into the problem in the first place. Healing or therapy results when the distressed individual has been<br />

shown new approaches to resolving mental distress, and been taught new reasoning skills—and learned<br />

how to use them—to resolve his or her own problems without having to depend on a clinical therapist<br />

or medical doctor. Today there are a growing number of philosophers willing to work with individuals<br />

outside of the traditional academic setting. And there are a growing number of students, even at the<br />

University of the Fraser Valley, who are working towards becoming therapists and counsellors, who are<br />

studying philosophy and putting it to use in helping others.<br />

Philosophy as counselling or therapy is based on four foundational premises:<br />

First, the mind is not the same as the brain. <strong>The</strong> mind is the contents of the brain, and those contents are<br />

propositional; they consist of beliefs, values, and assumptions. <strong>The</strong> mind is not a solid object; it consists<br />

of narrative constructs or products of “the integrating activity of a concept-using subject as a person in<br />

relation to others.” 22<br />

Second, mental problems are not the same as organic brain problems: changing one’s mind is not the same<br />

as changing one’s brain.<br />

Third, a person’s beliefs, values, and assumptions can cause mental distress, which in turn can cause a<br />

diagnosis of so-called mental illnesses.<br />

And fourth, good philosophical discussions can alleviate and prevent much of this distress. So-called<br />

mental illnesses and emotional disorders are the result of life’s conflicts and complications, and the<br />

associated beliefs, values, and assumptions, etc. Good philosophical discussions in therapy are different<br />

from hypothetical academic discussions. Philosophical counselling deals directly with personal life<br />

21 Parnas, Josef and Dan Zahavi. “<strong>The</strong> Role of Phenomenology in Psychiatric Diagnosis and Classifi Classification.” cation.” In Psychiatric<br />

Diagnosis and Classification. Mario Maj et al, eds. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2002, p. 138–162.<br />

22 Gillet, Grant (2009). <strong>The</strong> Mind and its Discontent. New York: Oxford University Press.<br />

330


problems. Some problems may require changes in the person’s life circumstances. Others require an<br />

examination, and perhaps an alteration of, the beliefs, values, and assumptions which have led to those<br />

problems.<br />

Philosophy can also be helpful to individuals who are not suffering from any specific diagnosable mental<br />

disorders, and yet are miserable. For example, one client explained to me that he had everything he<br />

could want—a house, money, a good job, and so on—but he said he was depressed. He felt like his life<br />

was empty and meaningless. Over the course of just a few sessions we discovered that the many years<br />

he had spent in the financial world left him feeling like he had accomplished nothing of value with his<br />

life. In fact he had been so engrossed in his goal of personal enrichment that he had not even considered<br />

getting married. Now he was feeling well-off but lonely, accomplished but unfulfilled, secure but selfish.<br />

We decided together that the ‘treatment’ for his so-called depression should be for him to volunteer at a<br />

local charity serving meals to the poor, and generally being helpful to the homeless and the destitute. This<br />

worked out very well because his acts of kindness for others eventually led to two good outcomes: his life<br />

felt much more meaningful to him, and he discovered a soul mate in one of the women volunteers.<br />

During another session, Samantha told me something very surprising. I have had clients tell me about all<br />

sorts of diagnoses with which various therapists and clinicians had labelled them. But Sam had received<br />

a diagnosis from her therapist that I had never encountered before. This expert had told her she believed<br />

Sam was suffering from demon possession. That was her professional diagnosis: Demon Possession.<br />

Sam explained how this bizarre diagnosis had caused her a lot of distress and worry. It had also made it<br />

impossible for her to discuss the meaning of life, or anything else for that matter, with this therapist. She<br />

had not gone back to this therapist after that. But then she asked me hesitantly if I thought that, perhaps,<br />

this diagnosis might be accurate. Could her suffering be due to some demon inside her?<br />

This led us once again into discussion of the nature of reality—a metaphysical question: could reality<br />

logically contain evil demons that can invade a human body? Could some mental illnesses be caused by<br />

Satanic spirits? I told Sam that in philosophical counselling we never make diagnoses and certainly not the<br />

diagnosis of demon possession because there is no logic to it, except in a religious way. It’s not possible to<br />

make metaphysical sense of a material world inhabited by non-material entities that could interfere with<br />

the lives of material human beings.<br />

But what exactly is this mysterious thing called ‘philosophy’ that challenges religious conceptions of<br />

reality? Simply put, philosophy is examining the reasons we—and others—have for the values we hold as<br />

good and the beliefs we hold to be true. Such an examination can free us from blindly following tradition,<br />

slavishly obeying authority figures, or acting only on our feelings. When philosophy is defined in this way<br />

331<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

it leaves no doubt that it is perfectly suited as treatment for the more common so-called ‘mental disorders’<br />

such as depression and mood swings. However philosophy has also been demonstrated to alleviate the<br />

suffering of those who have been diagnosed with so-called ‘serious’ or ‘clinical’ mental disorders that were<br />

once considered organic brain diseases such as ‘clinical’ depression, schizophrenia, paranoia, and more.<br />

Treatment outcome studies have shown that therapies based on philosophical discussions, in clinical<br />

psychology called ‘talk therapies,’ are the most effective in not only resolving seriously troubling issues,<br />

but in long-term effect and benefit. 23 Again, a mental disorder is not an organic problem of the material<br />

brain; it is instead a problem within a person’s mental narrative, within the mind’s propositional content<br />

which are beliefs, values, and assumptions. So it is no wonder that talk therapies have been found to be as<br />

effective, and in some cases more effective, than medications—and without the horrible side effects. 24 And<br />

these talk therapies are all just philosophy under a different, psychologically-sounding name.<br />

But philosophical counselling is not time travel. If the family the person grew up in was dysfunctional,<br />

if there was emotional mistreatment of family members, or if there was physical abuse, it’s not possible<br />

to go back and ‘fix’ that past with counselling. I tell my clients I’m willing to help them achieve any<br />

goal that is morally permissible, reasonable, and possible. Of course it’s reasonable to want the past to<br />

be different; but it’s not possible. So how can counselling help when the past is painful? Again, the past<br />

can’t be changed; it is what it was. But a person’s beliefs about the people and the events of the past<br />

can be examined and changed if necessary. And a person’s beliefs about who they are, and their level of<br />

responsibility for past events, can be scrutinized and changed if necessary to be more in tune with who<br />

they actually are, and wish to be, in the present.<br />

I’ve had many clients who felt that as children they were somehow responsible for their own mistreatment.<br />

We examine this belief about themselves and their beliefs about others to see if they are all justified. What<br />

we often find, of course, is that children mistakenly blame themselves for the terrible wrongdoing of their<br />

parents and other adults. This belief can remain with them well into adulthood in the form of guilt, shame,<br />

regret, low self-esteem, and so on. A philosophical examination of the past can bring release from this<br />

undeserved suffering.<br />

23 For a discussion of CBT as the best treatment for depression, social phobia (SP), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD),<br />

For a discussion of CBT as the best treatment for depression, social phobia (SP), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD),<br />

panic disorder (PD), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), see Pathological Anxiety: Emotional Processing in<br />

Etiology and Treatment edited by Barbara Olasov Rothbaum. New York: Guilford Press, 2006, p. 123, 132, 143, 160,<br />

204, 208, 254; See also Gerald Corey’s <strong>The</strong>ory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy. 5th ed. Pacific Grove:<br />

Brooks/Cole Publishing, 1996, p.170.<br />

24 Frank, Jerome D. and Julia B. Frank.<br />

Frank, Jerome D. and Julia B. Frank. Persuasion and Healing 3rd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 1993,<br />

p. 219.<br />

332


Sam said her mother and father felt that a family is the only thing that brings meaning. She said they were<br />

very disappointed in her for not yet being married at her age and not having the children they had been<br />

looking forward to. She explained again how everyone in her family always expected so much from her.<br />

She was seen as the strong and capable one, the one who took care of things and looked out for all the<br />

others. But when her doctor put her on anti-depressants it sent the message to everyone that she was no<br />

longer the super woman they had been looking up to. Sadly, her admission of her vulnerability did not get<br />

her the support she was hoping for. Instead there was disappointment for her weakness from her parents,<br />

and silent condemnation from her siblings. This led to our discussing who defines who we are. Are we<br />

autonomous beings who define ourselves; are we socially constructed; or are we a combination of both<br />

She pointed out that she believed that, in order to be a good person, she had to be available to help others<br />

at all times. But I reminded her that in a previous discussion we had come to agree with philosophers who<br />

said that to be a good person, to be a moral person, it’s enough that we try not to cause harm to others in<br />

what we say and do. <strong>The</strong>re is no requirement to constantly benefit others with the things we say or do.<br />

That can only be expected of saints and super heroes. She said she was very tired of trying to be a super<br />

hero.<br />

In several sessions that followed Samantha mentioned that she had never had any real desire to be married.<br />

She wondered if this was normal. This led to a discussion about what is considered normal in our society<br />

and why. She felt marriage would demand even more of her than had already been demanded of her in<br />

the past. She mentioned again how she had felt abandoned by friends and loved ones, and at the same<br />

time drained by family members who expected her to give more than she was physically, emotionally,<br />

and spiritually able. She now decided to give up trying to live up to all the expectations of others, and<br />

wondered what was reasonable to expect of herself. In the next few sessions, spanning a number of weeks,<br />

Sam came to stop worrying about “falling apart” as she called it, and having to go back into the hospital<br />

psychiatric ward. She said she was feeling much more in control of her own life because she had come to<br />

accept the fact that she had the right to make decisions about her own life, to live her life as she saw fit. “Yes,<br />

it’s good to be there for others,” she said, “but it’s also essential to look after myself.” In philosophy this<br />

perspective—that each person’s life is what they make of it—is called existentialism.<br />

I believe I may be the first philosopher to teach a university course in philosophy specifically designed<br />

to improve the professional skills of future mental healthcare workers: students on the road to<br />

becoming therapists, counsellors, and social workers. But this doesn’t mean that I’m the only person,<br />

as a philosopher, to see a problem in how mental illnesses have become almost exclusively defined as<br />

medical or biological disorders of the material brain. <strong>The</strong>re are an increasing number of psychotherapists<br />

and counsellors who disagree with the biomedical model of mental illness, and who recognize that<br />

philosophy ought to be acknowledged as having a rightful place in the practice of mental healthcare. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

333<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

acknowledge that philosophy can be an effective treatment or therapy for non-biological mental illnesses.<br />

Professionals in the many fields of mental healthcare have themselves often commented in their writings<br />

on how much a part of therapy philosophy already is and ought to be. For example:<br />

“Philosophy is unavoidable, because we always operate from within a context of beliefs,<br />

presuppositions, and background understandings.... I believe that Freud... was quite wrong when<br />

he claimed in his Weltanschauung lecture that ‘philosophy has no direct influence on the great<br />

mass of mankind; it is of interest to only a small number even of the top layer of intellectuals and is<br />

scarcely intelligible to anyone else.’” 25<br />

All practitioners in the field of psychotherapy “are already dealing with philosophical questions<br />

all the time; indeed, no one in our field in practice or theory, can possibly avoid it. <strong>The</strong> real issue is<br />

whether a given practitioner is doing so consciously and explicitly or only implicitly (i.e., without<br />

being aware of it).” 26<br />

“It is not necessary of course, nor indeed desirable, that every psychiatrist should become a<br />

philosopher. But if philosophy is to make a substantial contribution to the subject, all psychiatrists<br />

should have some exposure to philosophical thinking in their training, backed up with the<br />

opportunity for more detailed study for those with special aptitudes and interests.” 27<br />

“Psychotherapies use symbolic systems to heal the minds of sufferers and so are rooted in<br />

philosophical and religious systems of healing.” 28<br />

“...Philosophy does have tools which, in principle at least, can help psychiatry to achieve better<br />

understanding of [its own conceptual] problems.” 29<br />

In the treatment for mental health problems, “What is needed is philosophy as well as science.” 30<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is also an entire book dedicated to psychoanalysts, psychotherapists, counsellors, and social<br />

25 Hersch, Edwin L. From Philosophy to Psychotherapy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 2003, p. 345.<br />

26 Ibid., p. 267. Italics in the original.<br />

27 Fulford, K. W. M., “Mind and Madness: New Directions in Philosophy of Psychiatry.” In Philosophy, Psychology, and<br />

Psychiatry. Griffiths, Phillips A. editor: Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1994, p. 19.<br />

28 Horwitz, Allan V. Creating Mental Illness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002, p. 182.<br />

29 Fulford, K. W. M. Ibid., p. 15.<br />

30 Ibid., p. 24.<br />

334


workers titled Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice. 31 Its aim is to improve the quality of judgements and<br />

decisions made by mental health care workers. Its author draws extensively on one of the oldest fields in<br />

philosophy: informal logic, more commonly referred to as critical thinking.<br />

Philosophy as it is applied to therapy and counselling is based on three foundational premises: mental<br />

problems are not the same as brain problems; a person’s beliefs, values, and assumptions can cause so-<br />

called mental problems; and good philosophical discussions can alleviate and prevent many of these<br />

problems. But some people argue that psychotherapy is the best method to use when trying to help those<br />

afflicted with mental illnesses. Interestingly, when you look at the description of some of the foremost<br />

approaches to psychotherapy you find that they are all already solidly based on philosophy. In the book<br />

<strong>The</strong>ory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy Gerald Corey, a professor of counselling and<br />

licensed psychologist, describes them this way:<br />

Psychoanalysis is said to have “touched on philosophy, psychology, sociology, art, and<br />

literature...” 32 Freud and Jung were both thoroughly educated in philosophy.<br />

“Existential therapy can best be described as a philosophical approach that influences a<br />

counsellor’s therapeutic practice.” 33<br />

Person-centered therapy is “a humanistic approach that grew out of the philosophical background<br />

of the existential tradition.” 34<br />

Gestalt therapy is “phenomenological as it focuses on the client’s perception of reality. <strong>The</strong><br />

approach is existential in that it is grounded on the here and now and emphasizes that each person<br />

is responsible for his or her own destiny.” 35<br />

Cognitive-Behavioral <strong>The</strong>rapy (CBT) “has always been characterized by being highly rational,<br />

persuasive, interpretative, directive, and philosophical.” 36<br />

31 Gamberill, Eileen. 2 nd ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2005.<br />

32 Meissner, William W. “<strong>The</strong> Future Role of Psychoanalysis and Psychoanalytic-Oriented <strong>The</strong>rapy.” In <strong>The</strong> Challenge to<br />

Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy. Stephan De Schill and Serge Lebovici eds. Londaon: Jessica Kingsley Publishers,<br />

1999, p. 110.<br />

33 Corey, Gerald. <strong>The</strong>ory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy.” 5th ed. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing,<br />

1996, p. 170. Italics in the original.<br />

34 Ibid., p. 199.<br />

35 Ibid., p. 224. Italics in the original.<br />

36 Ibid., p. 318.<br />

335<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Modern day Rational Emotive Behaviour <strong>The</strong>rapy (REBT) is said to combine humanistic,<br />

philosophical, and behavioural therapy. 37 As well as being heavily influenced by the ancient<br />

philosophy of Stoicism, it owes “a philosophical debt” to a number of other sources that have<br />

influenced its development such as the philosophical writings of Immanuel Kant, Baruch Spinoza,<br />

Arthur Schopenhauer, Karl Popper, and Bertrand Russell. 38<br />

Reality therapy (RT) is concerned with “teaching people more effective ways to deal with the<br />

world…. <strong>The</strong> reality therapist functions as a teacher and a model.” 39<br />

Classical behaviour therapy today goes beyond mere Pavlovian behavioural conditioning and<br />

deals with emotions and meaning. 40<br />

Even a particularly psychological approach like the Adlerian therapy “includes identifying and<br />

exploring mistaken goals and faulty assumptions” “...it pays attention to the individual way in<br />

which people perceive their world... how the individual believes life to be.” 41<br />

<strong>The</strong>se are all, undeniably, an application of philosophical discussion and inquiry. Each of these methods<br />

is deeply indebted to philosophy. None of them resemble anything like a biomedical or pharmaceutical<br />

approach to brain disorders, yet all of these ‘talk therapies’ are said to be quite successful in treating<br />

individuals suffering from diagnosed mental illnesses. <strong>The</strong> reason for the successes of talk therapies lies in<br />

the fact that they employ philosophical discussions in the treatment of the so-called ‘mental illnesses’ with<br />

which individuals suffering from mental distress have been diagnosed.<br />

4. Conclusion<br />

In her final visit Samantha told me how it upset her when one of her long-time friends told her that she<br />

would probably continue to suffer from the mental illness of depression for the rest of her life. Sam said<br />

that she was convinced her friend was just wrong, and that others are wrong when they say depression is<br />

a disease that can’t be cured. She pointed out that she had stopped feeling depressed several sessions ago,<br />

and that over the last four months philosophical counselling had led her to see herself in a very different<br />

37 Ibid., p. 317.<br />

38 Dryden, Windy. Reasons and <strong>The</strong>rapeutic Change. London: Whurr, 1991, p. 4.<br />

39 Ibid., pp. 264, 273.<br />

40 Ibid., p. 285.<br />

41 Ibid., p. 139, p. 135. Italics in the original.<br />

336


light. She said she no longer considered herself a victim of the cruelty of others, or as abandoned by<br />

people who had died, or as a superwoman who must live up to the high expectations of family members.<br />

She had made the decision to continue her education, and aim for the university degree she had always<br />

wanted.<br />

Why do I teach philosophy to students who will become professional psychoanalysts, psychotherapists,<br />

clinical psychologists, counsellors, social workers? Because the therapeutic and counselling theories<br />

students are taught in their university psychology and counselling courses focus almost exclusively on<br />

the methodology: the process of applying this or that approach to a diagnosed collection of symptoms.<br />

Students learn the procedural ‘how’ of various methods; they learn ‘what’ to say, without ever learning<br />

the meaningful ‘why’ of the philosophy behind those methods. <strong>The</strong>y learn how to go through the motions<br />

of asking questions without understanding why some questions are better than others, without knowing<br />

how to recognize the reasoning problems within the painful narratives presented by their patients and<br />

clients, and without knowing what issues to focus on in order to form the best questions or resolve ethical<br />

dilemmas.<br />

Philosophy in a therapeutic or counselling relationship involves helping the patient or client examine the<br />

reasons he or she has for the values they hold as good, and the beliefs they hold as true. This will enable<br />

them to free themselves from blindly following tradition, slavishly obeying the dictates of authority<br />

figures, or acting only on their feelings. But in order to help the patient or client conduct a beneficial<br />

examination of his or her beliefs, values, and assumptions the therapist or counsellor must first become<br />

thoroughly familiar with all the subtle nuances of the practice of a legitimately philosophical inquiry. This<br />

is what I teach my students.<br />

I teach them that in my private philosophical counseling practice I apply all the different areas of<br />

philosophy to my clients’ problems, many of which had previously been diagnosed as mental illnesses:<br />

• critical thinking: a young woman who is so shy she doesn’t know how to live a normal life. This<br />

involves examining the reasons why she has such low self-esteem.<br />

• the philosophy of human nature: the man who wonders how he can make a significant life decision<br />

where the most profitable choice goes against what he considers to be his true, altruistic, nature.<br />

• metaphysics: the man who feels that the characters in the books he reads and the stories he writes<br />

have more reality than he can find in the people around him. It leads him to doubt his own physical<br />

existence.<br />

• epistemology: the young woman who is consulting a psychic who claims that her current life<br />

problems will be alleviated is she comes to know who she was in a previous lifetime. This also raises<br />

337<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

a number of a metaphysical questions.<br />

• ethical theories and applied ethics: various individuals who are trying to decide whether to, and how<br />

to, be honest with a teacher, an employer, or a lover.<br />

• philosophy of religion: the highly intellectual man whose passionate belief in God has led to him<br />

being diagnosed with schizoid-affective disorder.<br />

• social and political philosophy: the man who is trying to decide whether to accept a high-paying job<br />

in a military weapons manufacturing company. This is also a moral issue.<br />

• feminist philosophy: the young woman who believes she will be a failure in love and life because she<br />

believes she is ugly.<br />

• the meaning of life: the wealthy retired man who, after a long life of running a very successful<br />

business, feels his life has been mostly empty of value.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is the growing number of professionals in the field of mental healthcare who have come to recognize<br />

and accept the fact that the mind is not the same as the brain, and that many so-called diagnosable mental<br />

illnesses are not biological brain malfunctions, and therefore don’t require drug treatment. Interestingly the<br />

Royal College of Psychiatrists in London recently added to its curriculum for higher specialist training “a<br />

substantial section on philosophy, covering relevant areas of conceptual analysis, value theory, philosophy<br />

of science, philosophy of mind, and phenomenology.” 42 <strong>The</strong>y have come to recognize and acknowledge<br />

the value of philosophy in treating so-called ‘mental illnesses.’<br />

So much of what is done to patients today is still, unfortunately, based on the mistaken assumption that<br />

mental problems are somehow caused by the biological mechanisms or chemistry of the brain. What is<br />

often ignored is that mental health problems have to do with the non-material mind: the person’s beliefs,<br />

values, and assumptions. <strong>The</strong>y are often complex life problems that are not at all that simple to fix with<br />

only the help of family members or friends. But they are the sort of problems that are indeed fixable<br />

with the help of someone trained in philosophy. <strong>The</strong> reason why I teach philosophy to students who are<br />

studying to become professional psychoanalysts, psychotherapists, clinical psychologists, counsellors, and<br />

social workers is to help them improve their ability to create healing philosophical words that will permit<br />

them to alleviate all sorts of human distress that is mistakenly diagnosed as ‘mental illness’.<br />

Samantha stayed in touch with me by phone and by e-mails for another year after our philosophical<br />

counselling sessions had ended. And I’m pleased to report that her messages in that year acknowledged<br />

the healing power of the philosophical discussions we had shared together.<br />

42 Fulford, Bill et al. Ibid., p. 2.<br />

338


References<br />

APA (American Psychiatric Association) (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,<br />

4th edn, text rev. Washington, DC: APA.<br />

Averill, James R. and Thomas A. More (2000). Happiness. In Michael Lewis and Jeannette Haviland-<br />

Jones (eds.), Handbook of Emotions. New York: Guilford Press.<br />

Ben-Ze’ev, Aaron (1996). Typical Emotions. In William O’Donohue and Richard Kitchener, (eds.),<br />

Philosophy of Psychology. London: Sage Publications.<br />

Bergo, Bettina. Psychoanalytic Models: Freud’s Debt to Philosophy and His Copernican Revolution. In<br />

Jennifer Radden (ed.), <strong>The</strong> Philosophy of Psychiatry. New York: Oxford University Press.<br />

Campbell, Neil (2005). A Brief Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. Orchard Park: Broadview Press.<br />

Corey, Gerald (1996). <strong>The</strong>ory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy. 5th edn. Pacific Grove:<br />

Brooks/Cole Publishing.<br />

Frank, Jerome D. and Julia B. Frank (1993) Persuasion and Healing 3rd edn. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins<br />

University Press.<br />

Fulford, K.W.M., Tim Thornton, and George Graham (2006). Oxford Textbook of Philosophy and<br />

Psychiatry. New York: Oxford University Press.<br />

Gillet, Grant (2009). <strong>The</strong> Mind and its Discontent. New York: Oxford University Press.<br />

Hansen, Jennifer. Affectivity: Depression and Mania. In Jennifer Radden (ed.), <strong>The</strong> Philosophy of<br />

Psychiatry. New York: Oxford University Press.<br />

Hersch, Edwin L. (2003). From Philosophy to Psychotherapy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.<br />

Horowitz, Allan V. (2002). Creating Mental Illness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.<br />

Jung, Carl G. (1957) “Psychotherapy and a Philosophy of Life.” In Essays on Contemporary Events. R.<br />

F. C. Hull, trans. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press. 1989 edition.<br />

Kirsch, Irving, et al. (2008) Initial Severity and Antidepressant Benefits: A Meta-Analysis of Data<br />

Submitted to the Food and Drug Administration. (http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/<br />

info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050045)<br />

Maj, Mario et al. (eds.) (2002). Psychiatric Diagnosis and Classification. West Sussex: John Wiley &<br />

Sons.<br />

Sartre, J-P. (1948). <strong>The</strong> Emotions: Outline of a <strong>The</strong>ory. New York: Philosophical Library.<br />

Simon, Laurence. (2003) Psychology, Psychotherapy, Psychoanalysis, and the Politics of Human<br />

Relationships. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.<br />

Stein, Dan J. (2008). Philosophy of Psychopharmacology. New York: Cambridge University Press.<br />

339<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Instances of Philosophical Counseling and Byzantine Philosophy<br />

Shlomit C. Schuster<br />

Center Sophon<br />

Introduction<br />

Philosophy has a long tradition in helping people reflect on the questions and difficulties of life.<br />

Sometimes it has been used to cure, but mostly philosophers comprehend what is the truth, wisdom, and<br />

virtue in the life of the individual and the society, or they consider existence in a metaphysical sense. In<br />

this lecture, I present two instances of Philosophical Counseling or Philosophical Practice. I will start with<br />

the modern approach and then show how the ancient Byzantine approach can enrich modern practitioners.<br />

Philosophical Practice and Philosophical Psychoanalysis<br />

<strong>The</strong> modern approach I present is the practice of the German philosopher Dr. Gerd Achenbach<br />

(Achenbach 1984; Achenbach and Macho1985; Schuster 1991, 219-223; Schuster 1995, 51-55; Schuster<br />

1999). Achenbach’s original conception of philosophical counseling is essentially different from how<br />

some philosophers these days use the term philosophical counseling for a type of philosophical therapy<br />

with fixed therapeutic goals.<br />

In 1981 Achenbach was the first one who institutionalized philosophical practice as a modern day<br />

counseling practice. Some of his clients -- or visitors in Achenbach’s terminology—had already tried<br />

everything that today’s society offers as an antidote for mental suffering and existential questions.<br />

Finally people arrived for help at the office of a sympathetically listening skeptic. Achenbach’s aim<br />

is to offer the public an alternative to psychotherapy, but not an alternative therapy. His practice also<br />

includes philosophical psychoanalysis: an understanding of people’s past that leads to a philosophical<br />

understanding of the self. He explicitly states that philosophical practice is no therapy at all (Achenbach<br />

1984). Clinical diagnoses and treatment, along the lines of the medical paradigm of therapy, are absent in<br />

340


Achenbach’s approach, yet philosophical counseling can have therapeutic results. Nevertheless, the aim<br />

for sessions with a philosopher is to philosophize without holding a therapeutic intention.<br />

Achenbach resists turning his praxis idea into a method, and prefers to keep the style of conversation<br />

indeterminate and open-ended. <strong>The</strong> empty set of knowledge presented in this approach has been<br />

compared by Achenbach to Nicholas Cusa’s idea of “Learned Ignorance.” This 15 th century<br />

philosopher-theologian had been influenced by the concept of the “Via Negativa” in theology. <strong>The</strong><br />

concept of the Negative or Apophatic way has been most boldly expressed by the 5 th century Pseudo-<br />

Dionysius, in a small treatise called <strong>The</strong> Mystical <strong>The</strong>ology (Dionysius the Areopagite 1993). Apophatic<br />

thought is also presented in the writings of other Byzantine philosophers and theologians such as<br />

Saint Basil the Great, Saint Gregory the <strong>The</strong>ologian, Saint John Chrysostom, and Saint Maximus the<br />

Confessor, and many others (Lossky 1991).<br />

An exemplary apophatic description of God is taken from the Divine Liturgy of Saint John Chrysostom:<br />

“God ineffable, beyond comprehension, invisible, beyond understanding, existing forever and<br />

always the same.” <strong>The</strong> Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew finds the apophatic way present in Neo-<br />

Platonism, and Scholasticism, and he writes “in fact all religions adopt—to one degree or another – a<br />

fundamental negative approach to God”. Typical of the Byzantine Orthodox negative theology is that in<br />

its transcendence of all formulations and definitions it rather identifies “with personal encounter and a<br />

loving relationship with God in the communication of prayer” (Bartholomew 2008). In a similar sense<br />

in Achenbach’s approach the personal encounter and friendly relationship with the client stands central;<br />

theorizing about the interaction in psychological or other terms cannot comprehend that event.<br />

Nevertheless Achenbach gives some subtle suggestions, some “road signs,” that can help other<br />

philosophers aiming to follow suit. Of these road signs, four basic ones are the following:<br />

1. A sincere communication between the philosophical practitioner and the visitor, based on a<br />

“beyond-method” method.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> importance of dialogue, as that which enlivens and flows from being.<br />

3. “Auslegen”—a looking for explanations—in which the practitioner becomes united with the<br />

problem, not by imparting his own understanding of it, but by giving the visitor a fresh impulse<br />

to explain him or herself.<br />

4. <strong>The</strong> innovative component of dialogue, the element of wonder in philosophical practice, which<br />

does not allow for fixed viewpoints, standard attitudes, or permanent solutions.<br />

Achenbach’s approach has proven to be a beneficial and a secure philosophical way of aiding persons in<br />

341<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

thinking through the difficulties of daily life. Though some other philosophical practitioners may find it<br />

desirable to develop and practice philosophical counseling after their own taste, I find that Achenbach’s<br />

ideas contain all that is needed for practicing philosophy in a responsible and professional way.<br />

Philosophical psychoanalysis in the context of philosophical practice can be compared to philosophical<br />

autobiographical narratives. <strong>The</strong>se often demonstrate how one can understand the personal life outside<br />

of the formally institutionalized ways of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. In <strong>The</strong> Philosopher’s<br />

Autobiography:<br />

A Qualitative Study I demonstrate by analyzing in dept the autobiographies of Saint Augustine, Rousseau,<br />

and Sartre that they came to self-understandings that were informed and transformed by their own<br />

philosophical understandings. But not only these, but many other philosophers worldwide and throughout<br />

the ages practiced self-reflection and self-transformation through different forms of autobiographical<br />

writing. I listed about 200 references to philosophers with such autobiographical lives (Schuster 2003).<br />

Some prominent among these are Plato, Aurelius, Abelard, Dante, John Stuart Mill, Kierkegaard, and<br />

Russell.<br />

Studying these different lives shows how relatively of little importance Freudian or Jungian and other<br />

medical psychoanalytic understandings are in the understanding of the lives of these great thinkers. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

are indeed multiple alternatives to a deep understanding of the self.<br />

Byzantine Philosophy<br />

To consider ancient practices of philosophy helpful for modern philosophical counseling maybe<br />

questionable for some, yet when reading ancient texts persons are often surprised by how little the<br />

human condition has changed. A current book by the title Facing the <strong>World</strong>: Orthodox Thoughts on<br />

Global Perspectives (Archbishop Anastatasios 2003) shows how relevant Byzantine philosophy is for<br />

contemporary issues such as human rights, globalization, environment, and dialogue for the understanding<br />

of different religions.<br />

Byzantine philosophy dates from Late Antiquity unto the Middle Ages, and it questions deeply our<br />

ordinary daily lives, as well our modern day preoccupation with healing and personal happiness and well-<br />

being. At the other hand in its quest for the philosophical-spiritual realm it conveys great opportunities for<br />

the healing of body, mind, and soul.<br />

Byzantine philosophy blends Judaic, Christian, and Hellenistic ideas with a focus on knowing and<br />

342


following the way of life that has been exemplified by Christ. 1 At the beginning of Christ’s public<br />

appearance as teacher and healer, he read a passage from the Bible book Isaiah (61: 1), in which the<br />

presence or anointing of “the Spirit of the Lord” is associated with encouraging those in need, healing the<br />

broken hearted and the downtrodden, freeing those that are captivated, and making the blind to see. This<br />

verse was then acknowledged as the future realization of Christ’s life from then on. <strong>The</strong> practitioners of<br />

Byzantine philosophy accordingly focused on how it could be possible for them to acquire and remain<br />

in this “Spirit of the Lord.” <strong>The</strong>y found the way to such spiritual state of blessedness by obedience to the<br />

Gospel commandments, and through practicing virtues, asceticism, and noetic, or philosophical prayer<br />

(Metropolitan Hierotheos 2003; Igumen Chariton 1997). Spiritual readings and spiritual writings in words<br />

or symbols (such as icon paintings) are as well considered mental prayer and may transform the life and<br />

well-being of those participating in these activities.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Byzantine sages strove for philosophical enlightenment. This striving for the best possible<br />

understanding of all things is similar to philosophical counseling in having a philosophical conceptual<br />

aim. Those that attained in lesser or greater extent the lofty aim of enlightenment, obtained additionally<br />

therapeutic benefits for themselves and others. 2 Unlike the many kinds of enlightenment known<br />

from various other religious traditions, the Byzantines did not search for visions or spiritual gifts and<br />

revelations; their striving was essentially for being good and humble servants of Christ. <strong>The</strong> teachings<br />

of Christ were the philosophy par excellence for them and were considered in many aspects similar<br />

to ancient Greek philosophy. However, some scholars find that there are differences among the early<br />

Christian theologians in regard to accepting philosophy as theology: some rejected philosophy, others<br />

accepted it partly, and others embraced it all. (Viglas 2005, 1 (3), 5-9). But in general, for the Byzantines<br />

philosophy was not the servant of theology, it was theology.<br />

<strong>The</strong> sources that instruct in the Byzantine way of life are plenteous. Some of the classical texts in this<br />

domain are <strong>The</strong> Sayings of the Desert Fathers (collections of sayings going back to the first centuries<br />

of Christianity), <strong>The</strong> Institutions and <strong>The</strong> Conferences of John Cassian (4-5th century), <strong>The</strong> Evergetinos<br />

(a Greek collection of spiritual concerns for which answers were assembled from records about saints<br />

and sages up to the 11 th century), and <strong>The</strong> Philokalia (Byzantine writings collected and edited in the<br />

18 th century with the subtitle: “writings in which is explained how the mind is purified, illuminated, and<br />

perfected through practical and contemplative ethical philosophy”).<br />

1 For Byzantine philosophy, see: Cavarnos 2003; Viglas 2006, p. 3, pp. 73-105; Tatakis 2007.<br />

2 For sources on healing, see Larchet, 2002 and Father Kees, 2009-2011.<br />

343<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

It is possible to say that the 20th century saw a Byzantine revival (Louth 2008, 188-202), which is still<br />

engulfing more and more people on a global scale. In the context of this talk I can only give directions for<br />

further inquiries in this special branch of philosophy. <strong>The</strong> practical application of Byzantine studies for<br />

workgroups or in individual dialogues on the virtuous life and other topics has proven to be rewarding<br />

from a philosophical, therapeutic, and spiritual viewpoint. How philosophical counselors can introduce<br />

and benefit from these old, yet ever new understandings I will exemplify in the continuation of this paper.<br />

Some examples of Byzantine thought for daily life and for philosophical counseling sessions<br />

When a philosophical counselor listens to the problems of the client, questions can be asked that help the<br />

client to rethink and see the problem from a different perspective. It can also so be suggested that a client<br />

reflects on philosophical or spiritual texts such as <strong>The</strong> Sayings of the Desert Fathers (see an exemplary<br />

selective reading further on in this paper). Also a particular topic can be discussed that seems helpful for<br />

the client, and the topic is found in a Byzantine source. For example one can discuss the very different<br />

conceptualization of death then and now. In our global society there seems to be very little time and<br />

reason to think about death, and to come to terms with this issue many people go into therapy or read<br />

psychological based information on the subject. Mourning about death, or being affected through it, in one<br />

form or another, is soon considered pathological.<br />

In the Byzantine area reflection on the subject dead was considered particularly beneficent for daily life.<br />

Not only did the fear of eternal judgment caused persons to repent by daily remembering death, it had also<br />

an effect on the legal system and on behavior in warfare. Since death was seen as a journey to a world of<br />

no return, it was considered that persons had to be given a change to prepare themselves for the life in the<br />

world to come, and this was a reason to spare the lives of criminals and soldiers on the battle field. Though<br />

there was plenty of bloodshed in the many wars fought under the Byzantine Emperors, there was also a<br />

respect for life that was exceptional for that age. <strong>The</strong> lives of persons were spared to give them a change<br />

to repent. “This reluctance to take a person, life, even when legally and morally permissible, is exceptional<br />

in the history of mankind and surely merits further study. For it was not until well into the second half of<br />

the twentieth century that such sentiments were forcefully expressed and received broad support.” (Dennis<br />

2001). In general Byzantines believed in an after life and death was a transitional matter. “<strong>The</strong> only reason<br />

for fear was if one was not prepared. Death was not the end of life but a change of life. As life itself was a<br />

journey, so death was a journey. If you had packed the necessary provisions and if your documents were<br />

in order, then you had nothing to fear and you would arrive safely at your new destination” (Dennis 2001).<br />

In the Evergetinos (Bishop Chrysostomos et al. 1988) Saint Ephraim the Syrian (306-373) explains the<br />

Byzantine view on death as follows:<br />

344


For brothers and sisters, the period of time which we have at our disposal for repentance is our life<br />

on earth. Indeed, happy and blissful is he who has never once fallen into the nets of the Enemy. If,<br />

however, someone who was entangled in the nets of the Enemy has been able to break those nets<br />

and escape from the captivity of the Devil, he too should consider himself blessed; for, though we<br />

live in the flesh, in this way we are saved from the onslaught of the enemy of our souls, just as a<br />

fish escapes from the nets of the fisherman. Because, as we know, if a fish is caught and succeeds<br />

in breaking the net and dashing to the depths, he is saved as long as he is in water; but when he is<br />

dragged up in the net by the fisherman to dry land, then he can no longer help himself. <strong>The</strong> exact<br />

same thing happens to us: that is, as long as we live in the present life, we have received from God<br />

the authority and power to break the bonds of the evil intentions of the enemy by ourselves and to<br />

cast aside, through repentance, the burden of our sins, being most assuredly brought to salvation<br />

and inheriting the Kingdom of God. However, if the fearful command of death falls upon us and<br />

the soul leaves the body, and the body is placed deep in the tomb, then we are no longer able to<br />

help ourselves, just as the fish, when it is taken out of water, after being caught by the fisherman<br />

and safely placed in his fishing basket, cannot in any way be saved.<br />

Father Ephraim’s saying on death may give persons a new perspective on death and life. And even for<br />

those who do not believe in the existence of God there is good common sense in the idea that one has to<br />

live life now as good as possible.<br />

Byzantine readings<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are various sources of for the sayings of the desert fathers. A good introduction to the different<br />

texts is Desert Christians: An Introduction to the Literature of Early Monasticism (Harmless 2004).<br />

<strong>The</strong> wisdom of the desert fathers is mostly expressed in short stories or in aphorisms. This category in<br />

Byzantine philosophy is called “patristic thought” and is outlined by its narrative style such as in wisdom<br />

literature. I selected the following exemplary sayings (Orthodoxwiki.org and Ward 1975) for reading<br />

together with a client or for the client to read alone and contemplate on at home. 3<br />

3 Quotations are all cited from the copyright free site Orthodoxwiki.org with exception of those quotes marked as (Ward<br />

1975).<br />

345<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Abba Anthony<br />

When the holy Abba Anthony lived in the desert he was beset by accidie, and attacked by many sinful<br />

thoughts, he said to God, ‘Lord, I want to be saved but these thoughts do not leave me alone; what shall<br />

I do in my affliction How can I be saved’ A short while afterwards, when he got up to go out, Anthony<br />

saw a man like himself sitting at his work, getting up from his work to pray, then sitting down and plaiting<br />

a rope, then getting up again to pray. It was an angel of the Lord sent to correct and reassure him. He heard<br />

the angel saying to him, ‘Do this and you will be saved.’ At these words, Anthony was filled with joy and<br />

courage. He did this, and he was saved (Ward 1975).<br />

Some brothers came to find Abba Anthony to tell him about the visions they were having, and to find out<br />

from him if they were true or if they came from the demons. <strong>The</strong>y had a donkey, which died on the way.<br />

When they reached the place where the old man was, he said to them before they could ask him anything,<br />

‘How was it that the little donkey died on the way here?’ <strong>The</strong>y said, ‘How do you know about that,<br />

Father?’ And he told them, ‘<strong>The</strong> demons showed me what happened.’ So they said, ‘That was what we<br />

came to question you about, for fear we were being deceived, for we have visions which often turn out to<br />

be true.’ Thus the old man convinced them, by the example of the donkey that their visions came from the<br />

demons (Ward 1975).<br />

Abba Anthony said, ‘I saw the snares that the enemy spreads out over the world and I said groaning, “What<br />

can get through from such snares?” <strong>The</strong>n I heard a voice saying to me, “Humility” (Ward 1975).<br />

Abba Abraham<br />

Abba Abraham told of a man of Scetis who was a scribe and did not eat bread. A brother came to beg him<br />

to copy a book. <strong>The</strong> old man whose spirit was engaged in contemplation, wrote, omitting some phrases<br />

and with no punctuation. <strong>The</strong> brother, taking the book and wishing to punctuate it, noticed that words<br />

were missing. So he said to the old man, ‘Abba, there are some phrases missing.’ <strong>The</strong> old man said to him,<br />

‘Go, and practice first that which is written, then come back and I will write the rest.’<br />

Abba Ammonas<br />

Abba Ammonas was asked, ‘What is the “narrow and hard way?” (Mt. 7.14) He replied, ‘<strong>The</strong> “narrow<br />

and hard way” is this, to control your thoughts, and to strip yourself of your own will, for the sake of God.<br />

This is also the meaning of the sentence, “Lo, we have left everything and followed you”’ (Mt. 19.27).<br />

346


Abba Arsenius<br />

It was said of him that he had a hollow in his chest channeled out by the tears which fell from his eyes all<br />

his life while he sat at his manual work. When Abba Poemen learned that he was dead, he said weeping,<br />

‘Truly you are blessed, Abba Arsenius, for you wept for yourself in this world! He who does not weep<br />

for himself here below will weep eternally hereafter; so it is impossible not to weep, either voluntarily or<br />

when compelled through suffering’ (i.e. the latter suffering in hell).<br />

Abba Bessarion<br />

Abba Doulas, the disciple of Abba Bessarion said, ‘One day when we were walking beside the sea I was<br />

thirsty and I said to Abba Bessarion, “Father, I am very thirsty.” He said a prayer and said to me, “Drink<br />

some of the sea water.” <strong>The</strong> water proved sweet when I drank some. I even poured some into a leather<br />

bottle for fear of being thirsty later on. Seeing this, the old man asked me why I was taking some. I said<br />

to him, “Forgive me, it is for fear of being thirsty later on.” <strong>The</strong>n the old man said, “God is here, God is<br />

everywhere.”’<br />

Abba Cronius<br />

If the soul is vigilant and withdraws from all distraction and abandons its own will, then the spirit of God<br />

invades it and it can conceive because it is free to do so.<br />

Abba Daniel<br />

Abba Daniel said, ‘At Babylon the daughter of an important person was possessed by a devil. A monk<br />

for whom her father had a great affection said to him, “No-one can heal your daughter except some<br />

anchorites whom I know; but if you ask them to do so, they will not agree because of their humility. Let<br />

us therefore do this: when they come to the market, look as though you want to buy their goods and when<br />

they come to receive the price, we will ask them to say a prayer and I believe she will be healed.” When<br />

they came to the market they found a disciple of the old men setting there selling their goods and they led<br />

him away with the baskets, so that he should receive the price of them. But when the monk reached the<br />

house, the woman possessed with the devil came and slapped him. But he only turned the other cheek,<br />

according to the Lord’s Command (Matt. 5:39). <strong>The</strong> devil, tortured by this, cried out, “What violence! <strong>The</strong><br />

commandment of Jesus drives me out.” Immediately the woman was cleansed. When the old men came,<br />

they told them what had happened and they glorified God saying, “This is how the pride of the devil is<br />

brought low, through the humility of the commandment of Christ”’(Ward 1975).<br />

347<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Abba Dioscorus<br />

A brother questioned Abba Poemen in this way, ‘My thoughts trouble me, making me put my sins aside,<br />

and concern myself with my brother’s faults’. <strong>The</strong> old man told him the following story about Abba<br />

Dioscorus (the monk), ‘In his cell he wept over himself, while his disciple was sitting in another cell.<br />

When the latter came to see the old man he asked him, “Father, why are you weeping?” “I am weeping<br />

over my sins,” the old man answered him. <strong>The</strong>n his disciple said, “You do not have any sins, Father.” <strong>The</strong><br />

old man replied, “Truly, my child, if I were allowed to see my sins, three or four men would not be enough<br />

to weep for them.”<br />

Abba Elias<br />

Abba Elias, the minister, said, ‘What can sin do where there is penitence? And of what use is love where<br />

there is pride?’<br />

Abba Evagrius<br />

Abba Evagrius said, “Take away temptations and no one will be saved.”<br />

Abba Hilarion<br />

From Palestine, Abba Hilarion went to the mountain to Abba Anthony. Abba Anthony said to him, ‘You<br />

are a welcome torch which awakens the day.’ Abba Hilarion said, ‘Peace to you, pillar of light, giving<br />

light to the world.’<br />

Abba Hyperechius<br />

It is better to eat meat and drink wine than to eat the flesh of one’s brethren through slander.<br />

Abba Isaiah<br />

(Abba Isaiah) said to those who were making a good beginning by putting themselves under the direction<br />

of the holy Fathers, ‘As with purple dye, the first coloring is never lost.’ And, ‘Just as young shoots are<br />

easily trained back and bent, so it is with beginners who live in submission.’<br />

348


Abba Isidore<br />

Abba Isidore went one day to see Abba <strong>The</strong>ophilus, pope of Alexandria and when he returned to Scetis the<br />

brethren asked him, ‘What is going on in the city?’ But he said to them, ‘Truly, brothers, I did not see the<br />

face of anyone there, except that of the archbishop.’ Hearing this they were very anxious and said to him,<br />

‘Has there been a disaster there, then, Abba?’ He said ‘Not at all, but the thought of looking at anyone<br />

did not get the better of me.’ At these words they were filled with admiration, and strengthened in their<br />

intention of guarding the eyes from all distraction.<br />

Abba Isidore the priest<br />

(Abba Isidore the priest) said, ‘If you fast regularly, do not be inflated with pride, but if you think highly<br />

of yourself because of it, then you had better eat meat. It is better for a man to eat meat than to be inflated<br />

with pride and to glorify himself.’<br />

Abba John of the Cells<br />

Abba John of the Cells told us this story: ‘<strong>The</strong>re was in Egypt a very rich and beautiful courtesan, to<br />

whom noble and powerful people came. Now one day she happened to be near the church and she wanted<br />

to go in. <strong>The</strong> sub-deacon, who was standing at the doors, would not allow her to enter saying, “You are<br />

not worthy to enter the house of God, for you are impure.” <strong>The</strong> Bishop heard the noise of their argument<br />

and came out. <strong>The</strong>n the courtesan said to him, “He will not let me enter the church.” So the Bishop said<br />

to her, “You are not allowed to enter it, for you are not pure.” She was filled with compunction and said<br />

to him, “Henceforth I will not commit fornication anymore.” <strong>The</strong> bishop said to her, “If you bring your<br />

wealth here, I shall know that you will not commit fornication anymore.” She brought her wealth and the<br />

bishop burnt it all in the fire. <strong>The</strong>n she went into the church, weeping and saying, “If this has happened to<br />

me below, what would I not have suffered above?” So she was converted and became a vessel of election.’<br />

Abba John the Dwarf<br />

Abba John the Dwarf said, ‘<strong>The</strong>re was a spiritual old man who lived a secluded life. He was held in high<br />

estimation in the city and enjoyed a great reputation. He was told that a certain old man, at the point of<br />

death, was calling for him, to embrace him before he fell asleep. He thought to himself, if I go by day, men<br />

will run after me, giving me great honor, and I shall not be at peace in all that. So I will go in the evening<br />

in the darkness and I shall escape everyone’s notice. But lo, two angels were sent by God with lamps to<br />

give him light. <strong>The</strong>n the whole city came out to see his glory. <strong>The</strong> more he wished to flee from glory, the<br />

349<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

more he was glorified. In this was accomplished that which is written: “He who humbles himself will be<br />

exalted”’(Luke 14:11).<br />

Abba John the Persian<br />

It was said of Abba John the Persian that when some evildoers came to him, he took a basin and wanted to<br />

wash their feet. But they were filled with confusion, and began to do penance.<br />

Abba Lucius<br />

Some of the monks who are called Euchites went to Enaton to see Abba Lucius. <strong>The</strong> Old man asked<br />

them, ‘What is your manual work?’ <strong>The</strong>y said, ‘We do not touch manual work but as the Apostle says,<br />

we pray without ceasing.’ <strong>The</strong> old man asked them if they did not eat and they replied they did. So he<br />

said to them ‘When you are eating, who prays for you then?’ Again he asked them if they did not sleep<br />

and they replied they did. And he said to them, ‘When you are asleep, who prays for you then?’ <strong>The</strong>y<br />

could not find any answer to give him. He said to them, ‘Forgive me, but you do not act as you speak.<br />

I will show you how, while doing my manual work, I pray without interruption. I sit down with God,<br />

soaking my reeds and plaiting my ropes’, and I say “God, have mercy on me, according to your great<br />

goodness and according to the multitude of your mercies, save me from my sins.” So he asked them if<br />

this were not prayer and they replied it was. <strong>The</strong>n he said to them, ‘So when I have spend the whole day<br />

working and praying, making thirteen pieces of money more or less, I put two pieces of money outside<br />

the door and I pay for my food with the rest of the money. He who takes the two pieces of money prays<br />

for me when I am eating and when I am sleeping; so, by the grace of God, I fulfill the precept to pray<br />

without ceasing.’<br />

Abba Macarius<br />

One day Abba Macarius the Great came to Abba Anthony’s dwelling on the mountain. When he knocked<br />

on the door, Anthony came out to him and said to him, ‘Who are you?’ He replied, ‘I am Macarius.’ <strong>The</strong>n<br />

Anthony went inside and shut the door leaving him there. Later, seeing his patience, he opened the door<br />

and received Macarius with joy, saying to him, ‘I have wanted to see you for a long time, having heard<br />

about you.’ He rendered him all the duties of hospitality and made him rest for he was very tired. When<br />

evening came, Abba Anthony soaked some palm-leaves for himself, and Abba Macarius said to him, ‘Allow<br />

me to soak some for myself.’ He replied: ‘Do so.’ Having made a large bundle, he soaked them. <strong>The</strong>n<br />

sitting down in the evening they spoke of the salvation of the soul, while they plaited the leaves. <strong>The</strong> rope<br />

which Macarius was making hung down through the window in the cave. Going in early, blessed Anthony<br />

350


saw the length of Abba Macarius’ rope and said, ‘Great power comes out of these hands’ (Ward 1975).<br />

Abba Macarius was asked, ‘How should one pray?’ <strong>The</strong> old man said, ‘<strong>The</strong>re is no need at all to make<br />

long discourses; it is enough to stretch out one’s hands and say, “Lord, as you will, and as you know, have<br />

mercy.” And if the conflict grows fiercer say, “Lord, help!” He knows very well what we need and he<br />

shows us his mercy’ (Ward 1975).<br />

Abba Matoes<br />

A brother went to Abba Matoes and said to him, ‘How is it that the monks of Scetis did more than the<br />

Scriptures required in loving their enemies more than themselves?’ Abba Matoes said to him, ‘As for me I<br />

have not yet managed to love those who love me as I love myself.’<br />

Abba Moses<br />

It happened that Abba Moses was struggling with the temptation of fornication. Unable to stay any longer<br />

in the cell, he went and told Abba Isidore. <strong>The</strong> old man exhorted him to return to his cell. But he refused,<br />

saying, ‘Abba, I cannot.’ <strong>The</strong>n Abba Isidore took Moses out onto the terrace and said to him, ‘Look<br />

towards the west.’ He looked and saw hordes of demons flying about and making a noise before launching<br />

an attack. <strong>The</strong>n Abba Isidore said to him, ‘Look towards the east.’ He turned and saw an innumerable<br />

multitude of holy angels shining with glory. Abba Isidore said, ‘See, these are sent by the Lord to the<br />

saints to bring them help, while those in the west fight against them. Those who are with us are more in<br />

number than they are. <strong>The</strong>n Abba Moses gave thanks to God plucked up courage and returned to his cell<br />

(Ward 1975).<br />

Abba Pambo<br />

<strong>The</strong> same Abba <strong>The</strong>ophilus, the archbishop, came to Scetis one day. <strong>The</strong> brethren who were assembled<br />

said to Abba Pambo, ‘Say something to the Archbishop, so that he may be edified.’ <strong>The</strong> old man said to<br />

them, ‘If he is not edified by my silence, he will not be edified by my speech.’<br />

Abba Pimen<br />

A man may seem to be silent, but if his heart is condemning others, he is babbling ceaselessly. But there<br />

may be another who talks from morning till night and yet he is truly silent, that is, he says nothing that is<br />

not profitable.<br />

351<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Amma <strong>The</strong>odora<br />

Amma <strong>The</strong>odora said, ‘Let us strive to enter by the narrow gate, Just as the trees, if they have not stood<br />

before the winter’s storms cannot bear fruit, so it is with us; this present age is a storm and it is only<br />

through many trials and temptations that we can obtain an inheritance in the kingdom of heaven.’<br />

She also said that neither asceticism, nor vigils nor any kind of suffering are able to save, only true<br />

humility can do that. <strong>The</strong>re was an anchorite who was able to banish the demons; and he asked them, ‘What<br />

makes you go away?’ ‘Is it fasting?’ <strong>The</strong>y replied, ‘We do not eat or drink.’ ‘Is it vigils?’ <strong>The</strong>y replied,<br />

‘We do not sleep.’ ‘Is it separation from the world?’ ‘We live in the deserts.’ ‘What power sends you away<br />

then?’ <strong>The</strong>y said, ‘Nothing can overcome us, but only humility.’ ‘Do you see how humility is victorious<br />

over the demons?’<br />

Abba <strong>The</strong>odore<br />

It was said about (Abba <strong>The</strong>odore) that, though he was made a deacon at Scetis he refused to exercise<br />

the office and fled to many places from it. Each time the old men brought him back to Scetis, saying, ‘Do<br />

not leave your diaconate.’ Abba <strong>The</strong>odore said to them, ‘Let me pray God that he may tell me for certain<br />

whether I ought to take my part in the liturgy.’ <strong>The</strong>n he prayed God in this manner, ‘If it is your will that<br />

I should stand in this place then make me certain of it.’ <strong>The</strong>n appeared to him a column of fire, reaching<br />

from earth to heaven, and a voice said to him, ‘If you can become like this pillar, go be a deacon.’ On<br />

hearing this he decided never to accept the office. When he went to church the brethren bowed before him<br />

saying, ‘If you do not wish to be a deacon, at least hold the chalice.’ But he refused, saying, ‘If you do not<br />

leave me alone, I shall leave this place.’ So they left him in peace.<br />

Abba Tithoes<br />

<strong>The</strong> way of humility is this: self-control, prayer, and thinking yourself inferior to all creatures.<br />

Abba Zacharias<br />

One day Abba Moses said to brother Zacharias, ‘Tell me what I ought to do’ At these words the latter<br />

threw himself on the ground at the old man’s feet and said, ‘Are you asking me, Father?’ <strong>The</strong> old man said<br />

to him ‘Believe me, Zacharias, my son, I have seen the Holy Spirit descending upon you and since then I<br />

am constrained to ask you.’ <strong>The</strong>n Zacharias drew his hood off his head put it under his feet and trampled<br />

on it, saying, ‘<strong>The</strong> man who does not let himself be treated thus, cannot become a monk.’<br />

352


Abba Zeno<br />

Abba Zeno said, ‘If a man wants God to hear his prayer quickly, then before he prays for anything else,<br />

even his own soul, when he stands and stretches out his hands towards God, he must pray with all his<br />

heart for his enemies. Through this action God will hear everything that he asks.’<br />

Conclusion<br />

Philosophical counselors may encourage persons to transcend or change their difficult private, social,<br />

or political situations, through practicing the philosophical understandings they together arrive at in<br />

philosophical counseling sessions.<br />

Though Byzantine philosophy may not be interesting for everybody, for the philosophical counselors, and<br />

clients that it does appeal to, it can be a rich source of inspiration, philosophical enlightenment, and even<br />

healing. When persons want to transform their lives, they often need a living example of transformation.<br />

From various Byzantine texts, and personal contacts with practitioners of the Byzantine way, a modern<br />

philosophical counselor can learn to a great extent how to achieve a virtuous and ascetic life in which<br />

noetic prayer is for the benefit of all.<br />

References<br />

Achenbach, Gerd. B. 1984. Philosophische Praxis. Cologne: Juergen Dinter.<br />

Achenbach, Gerd B. And Thomas Macho. 1985. Das Prinzip Heilung. Cologne: Juergen Dinter.<br />

Archbishop Anastasios. 2003. Facing the <strong>World</strong>: Orthodox Thoughts on Global Perspectives. New York:<br />

St Vladimir’s Seminary Press<br />

Bishop Chrysostomos. 1988. <strong>The</strong> Evergetinos, A Complete Text. Etna, California: Center for Traditionalist<br />

Orthodox Studies.<br />

Cavarnos, Constantine. 2003. Orthodoxy and Philosophy. Belmont, Ma: Institute for Byzantine and<br />

Modern Greek Studies.<br />

Dennis, George T. 2001. Death in Byzantium Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 55. (www.doaks.org/resources/<br />

publications/dumbarton.../dp55ch01.pdf.)<br />

Dionysius the Areopagite. 1993. Pseudo-Dionysius: <strong>The</strong> Complete Works. New York: Paulist Press<br />

International.<br />

Father Symeon Sean Kees. 2009-2011. Orthodox Christian Medicine; <strong>The</strong> healing of soul and body<br />

through the ancient Orthodox Christian Way of Life. http://orthodoxhealing.blogspot.com.<br />

Harmless, William. 2004. Desert Christians: An Introduction to the Literature of Early Monasticism.<br />

353<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Oxford: Oxford University Press.<br />

Igumen Chariton of Valamo. 1997. <strong>The</strong> Art of Prayer: An Orthodox Anthology. New York: Faber and<br />

Faber.<br />

Larchet, Jean-Claude. 2002. <strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>ology of Illness. New York: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press.<br />

Lossky, Vladimir. 1976. <strong>The</strong> Mystical <strong>The</strong>ology of the Eastern Church. New York: St. Vladimir’s<br />

Seminary Press.<br />

Louth, Andrew. 2008. <strong>The</strong> patristic revival and its protagonists. In <strong>The</strong> Cambridge Companion to<br />

Orthodox Christian <strong>The</strong>ology. Edited by Cunningham, Mary B. and <strong>The</strong>okritoff, Elizabeth.<br />

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />

Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktos. 2003. A Night in the Desert of the Holy Mountain: Discussion with<br />

a Hermit on the Jesus Prayer. Levadia, Greece: Birth of the <strong>The</strong>otokos Monastery.<br />

Patriarch Bartholomew. 2008. Encountering the Mystery: Understanding Orthodox Christianity Today,<br />

London: Doubleday Press, 2008.<br />

Orthodoxwiki. 2005. Sayings of the Desert Fathers. (http://orthodoxwiki.org/Sayings_of_the_Desert_<br />

Fathers)<br />

Schuster, Shlomit C. 1991. Philosophical Counselling. Journal of Applied Philosophy 8 (2): 219-223.<br />

Schuster, Shlomit. C. 1995. Report on Applying Philosophy in Philosophical Counseling. <strong>The</strong><br />

International Journal of Applied Philosophy 9 (2): 51-55.<br />

Schuster, Shlomit C. 1999. Philosophy Practice; An Alternative to Counseling and Psychotherapy. Praeger<br />

Publishers: Westport, Conn.<br />

Schuster, Shlomit. C. 2003. <strong>The</strong> Philosopher’s Autobiography: A Qualitative Study. Westport, CT: Praeger.<br />

Tatakis, Basil N. 2007. Christian Philosophy in the Patristic and Byzantine Tradition. Rollinsford, NH:<br />

Orthodox Research Institute.<br />

Viglas, Katelis. 2005. Mysticism and rational spirituality: When theology meets philosophy in Byzantium.<br />

European Journal of Science and <strong>The</strong>ology 1 (3): 5-9<br />

Viglas, Katelis. 2006. A Historical Outline of Byzantine Philosophy and Its Basic Subjects. Res Cogitas 3:<br />

73 -105.<br />

Ward, Benedicta. 1975. <strong>The</strong> Sayings of the Desert Fathers. Kalamazoo, Michigan: Cistercian Publication.<br />

354


Healing Practices in the <strong>Humanities</strong><br />

Kayama Rika<br />

Rikkyo University<br />

Seeing from my viewpoint as a psychiatrist, Japanese society has been troubled by various “symptoms”.<br />

I think they might not simply be Japanese cultural phenomena; rather, they might be indicators of a<br />

pandemic of psychological problems that the global society will have to face in the near future. So I will<br />

introduce some of them which became serious social problem in recent years in Japan.<br />

1. 2011 appears to be the 14th straight year for the annual suicide count to exceed 30,000, according<br />

to tentative statistics recently released by the National Police Agency.<br />

2. Bullying in the schoolyard or in the hallways between classes is a common occurrence in many<br />

countries. But in Japan, ijime, bullying at school, is a much more serious social problem. In<br />

Japan, this bullying behavior sometimes escalates to the point where the victim commits suicide.<br />

3. Hikikomori, or severe social withdrawal, in Japan’s young people has been a prominent public<br />

mental health concern since around 2000. On the other hand, more recent, concern is a syndrome<br />

dubbed “modern-type depression”. This catchy name has quickly and widely spread to the public<br />

via Japan’s mass media and internet-related media, yet there is no consensus guideline for its<br />

diagnosis and treatment, which has led to confusion when dealing with the disorder in clinical<br />

practice.<br />

4. Recently, young people in Japan have begun to use new electronic media technologies, including<br />

cell phones and the Internet, with increasing frequency. But anonymous communication among<br />

adolescents often involves cyber-bullying, which can lead to mental health problems in victims.<br />

5. It appears new type of ultranationalist groups in Japan. <strong>The</strong> groups are openly anti-foreign in<br />

their message, and unafraid to win attention by holding unruly street demonstrations. <strong>The</strong>y are<br />

considered to be the Net far right (so called “Neto-uyo”), because they are loosely organized<br />

via the Internet, and gather together only for demonstrations. At other times, they are a virtual<br />

community that maintains its own Web sites to announce the times and places of protests, swap<br />

355<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

information and post video recordings of their demonstrations. Most of their members appear to<br />

be young men. Kunio Suzuki, one of the members of well-known far-right group says the group<br />

is not racist, and rejected the comparison with neo-Nazis. Instead, he said he had modeled his<br />

group after another overseas political movement, the Tea Party in the United States.<br />

It seems they are young men and women who feel disenfranchised and disappointed in the society and their<br />

leaders. <strong>The</strong>y have got damaged. <strong>The</strong>y always feel strong anxiety but they can’t face it directly, so they are<br />

looking for someone to project their inner world.<br />

Now, many young voters have embraced a largely unknown new party led by a brash young leader who<br />

promises a drastic overhaul of the government. That party, the Japan Restoration Association, was formally<br />

inaugurated in September 2012, by its leader, the mayor of Osaka, Toru Hashimoto. This 43-year-old<br />

man former television commentator and a lawyer came out of nowhere four years ago to electrify Osaka<br />

and his ability to do what few national leaders have seemed able to: push through painful changes. Mr.<br />

Hashimoto battled labor unions to slash deficit-ridden budgets and impose performance requirements on<br />

schoolteachers.<br />

Now, he is taking his antiestablishment insurgency to the national stage, naming about 350 candidates,<br />

most of them political neophytes trained at Mr. Hashimoto’s own political “cram school,” to run in<br />

parliamentary elections expected as soon as November. His charisma has made the group a feared force in<br />

Japanese politics, seemingly overnight.<br />

In the interview by the newspaper the following, he emphasized the necessity for competition.<br />

Question: We first want to ask you about your vision for Japanese society that you want to realize as<br />

a politician. Will you pursue economic growth at any cost, or would you be satisfied with a lifestyle<br />

that matches the current state of the nation? Which are you seeking?<br />

Hashimoto: <strong>The</strong> level of lifestyle of the Japanese right now from a global perspective is a luxurious<br />

one equivalent to a five-star hotel ranking. Clean water flows when one turns on the faucet and the<br />

level of education and medicine is high. <strong>The</strong>re is unemployment insurance and pension and as a last<br />

gap, there is also public welfare. To enjoy all that requires a great deal of cost. <strong>The</strong> decision must<br />

first be made on whether we can maintain that level or not. While there is no need to seek a level<br />

for Japan that goes beyond the current one, I want to at least maintain that current level (Hashimoto:<br />

Give politicians ‘carte blanche’ on policies, <strong>The</strong> Asahi Shimbun, February 13, 2012).<br />

356


At the same time, He insisted that people needed to have the strength which can stand the pressure of the<br />

competition.<br />

Q: You are a strong person, but not everyone in society is strong. What would you say to such<br />

people?<br />

A: I would ask them: “Are you willing to allow the level of lifestyle in Japan to fall? Would you be<br />

happy with a level similar to Southeast Asia?” If people want to maintain Japan at the current<br />

level, then people will have to make the effort.<br />

And it is most characteristic that he told a form of carte blanche by electors is required to the politician.<br />

Q: While you have called for a “politics that can decide,” would that not lead to self-righteousness<br />

among leaders?<br />

A: Although we would allow discussions to be made fully, in the end a decision will have to be<br />

made. <strong>The</strong> more you recognize and allow a wide variety of value systems, the greater the need<br />

for a method of making a decision. That is what I mean by a “democracy that can decide.” <strong>The</strong><br />

people selected by the voters should be given the authority to decide. I believe that is the role of<br />

elections.<br />

Although lawyers can only do what is written in the contract of engagement, this is not the<br />

case with politicians. It will not be possible to include everything in a campaign manifesto that<br />

is presented to the voters. Politicians would be unable to act if their range of discretion was<br />

narrowed through a long list of specific policy measures. In elections, candidates should set out<br />

the general direction in their appeals to the public. It would be a form of carte blanche.<br />

I think there is a serious pathology which should be treated in the Japanese society.<br />

What went through our minds as we enthusiastically awaited for the appearance of Hashimoto was a ‘quiet<br />

public will’ that entreated him to do something—to do anything he could to liberate us from the anxiety<br />

and fear. While I use the term ‘quiet’ because of the formless nature of this ‘something’ we wanted, I have<br />

also explained that it was not a calm or casual request rather it required urgent action without delay.<br />

Hashimoto was greeted with enthusiasm because he clarified directions such as the following:<br />

‘Approach everything you come up against by making it simple and easy to understand’.<br />

357<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

‘Set forth clear opposing schemes consisting of such things as new and old, as well as ally and<br />

enemy’.<br />

‘Whittle down your choices into two and give a clear positive or negative response to both’.<br />

However, I have noted that when considered from a psychopathological perspective, all these directions are<br />

somewhat unsound defence mechanisms for avoiding anxiety or conflict, and that by their very nature they<br />

do not lead to solutions.<br />

One characteristic of particular concern is that many of these directions’ are similar to a number of the<br />

primitive defence mechanisms that can be considered even more psychological in nature than the emotional<br />

defence mechanisms described by Freud. In Chapter three, I have explained how the binary choice between<br />

‘black or white’ is similar to the emotional mechanism of splitting.<br />

<strong>The</strong> concept of splitting has been attributed to the French psychiatrist Pierre Janet, a contemporary of<br />

Freud’s, and studies have suggested that it then caught Freud’s attention, and finally being clearly defined<br />

by Freud’s daughter, Anna Freud.<br />

American psychoanalyst Otto F. Kernberg used the concept of splitting to explain the pathology of<br />

borderline personality disorder. According to Kernberg, many of the inner aspects of those with borderline<br />

personalities consist of ‘bad parts’ and ‘unpleasant parts’. <strong>The</strong>se parts of their personality sometimes cause<br />

them to attack and destroy both themselves and others, which they know brings ruin both on themselves<br />

and others.<br />

Because of this, the defence mechanisms that they take as a last resort to protect both themselves and others<br />

are classified as splitting. By creating, separating and protecting ‘completely good things’ in their internal<br />

and external worlds, they strive to prevent themselves from being tainted by their bad and unpleasant parts.<br />

This behavior is similar to someone whose room is mostly dirty, creating a completely clean corner and<br />

calling it their ‘sanctuary’ and keeping only this part of their room spotless. However, the more they<br />

maintain their sanctuary, the more noticeable the surrounding grime becomes and their irritation with it<br />

grows stronger.<br />

<strong>The</strong> frightening aspect of this process is that in some cases, these values of ‘good parts/good people’ and ‘bad<br />

parts/bad people’ that they have defined in their minds suddenly reverse places. Returning to the example of<br />

the room, what they had been maintaining as their sanctuary suddenly becomes something alarming; they<br />

feel contaminated by what they now feel is ‘All a big lie! It is because of this lie that I cannot breathe!’ and<br />

358


then launch an all-out assault against this part. In this instant, though, they are besieged with severe regret<br />

over what they have done, lamenting that ‘I destroyed such an important thing. Why did I do that?’ thus<br />

allowing their innate ‘unpleasant parts’ to increase rapidly with sentiments such as ‘I really am despicable!’<br />

People with borderline personalities whose values are always determined on the basis of whether they<br />

are accepted by those dear to them are constantly beset by feelings of emptiness resulting from their<br />

fundamental lack of understanding of who these really are. Such people feel that their lives are great when<br />

many people like them and they are popular, during which times they have a sense of being useful to<br />

others; however, the moment they are alone, a sense of emptiness plagues them and they feel that ‘I might<br />

as well be dead’. Some even experience suicidal ideation.<br />

Although splitting—i.e. between these extreme dichotomies or choices between two things—is a<br />

pathological emotional mechanism, it also has certain benefits. It allows people to feel that they need not<br />

face their anxieties or emotional problems and that they need not give them any more attention than they<br />

already have.<br />

However, splitting is not a phenomenon we see only in individuals’ mental disorders.<br />

Naturally, a number of other phenomena come into existence through the mechanism of splitting,<br />

from modern Japanese politics to the simplified yardstick of ‘to sell or not to sell’—i.e. market<br />

fundamentalism—that forms the foundations of our modern economic world.<br />

So, what exactly is the nature of the anxiety and conflict in society that market fundamentalism strives to<br />

avoid through the mechanism of splitting? Is this not a situation in which, according respect to the minority,<br />

‘meaningful products for humanity can also be found among those that do not sell’ and ‘a product’s good<br />

quality does not mean it will sell well; in fact, even bad products sometimes become bestsellers’?<br />

In other words, as long as market fundamentalism persists, uncertain elements and market complexities<br />

that cannot be explained using simple logic can all be dealt with as exceptions. This approach makes it<br />

acceptable to avert one’s eyes from the elements of humanity that are complex or difficult to understand.<br />

Since the second half of the 20th century, human beings have been looking away from these complex<br />

and incomprehensible aspects by mobilizing a variety of forces to visualise and systematise splitting-like<br />

emotional attitudes in creating market fundamentalism. <strong>The</strong>y have thus created a world in which one does<br />

not have to predict circumstances that favour minorities nor even acknowledge the possibility that such<br />

unforeseen circumstances may occur.<br />

359<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

In a sense, people living in this world find it extremely comfortable, a world with no troubling thoughts,<br />

where one need not worry about things.<br />

As long as people continue to choose between only yes and no in the choices presented to them, wait for<br />

someone to check their answers with a sense of anxiety and are happy or sad depending on whether they<br />

got it right or wrong, only then such people survive without feeling doubt, shame or pain because they are<br />

never rationally aware that they are being ruled by bipartite thoughts. <strong>The</strong>ir psychological worlds, though,<br />

are completely devoid of profundity, like a single stick that consists solely of a black end and a white end<br />

that one spins to make a decision.<br />

When the stick is spun around, will the result each time be black or white? People with borderline<br />

personality disorders are convinced that these colours genuinely represent their own feelings and will,<br />

which they believe might reverse at any given moment. In addition, it is not so much for the individual<br />

concerned who is worried but those around him or her who are constantly affected by that person. More<br />

specifically, people with these disorders also seem unable to store the types of conflicts in their minds<br />

which are the subjects of traditional psychoanalysis. That said, people with these disorders have slight<br />

worries of their own because their personality does not always make them happy. <strong>The</strong>y are constantly<br />

in a state of anxiety over whether they will make the wrong choice next time, as a result of which they<br />

sometimes expend all of their energy worrying and exhaust themselves. Furthermore, as they constantly<br />

experience unreasoning irritation and anger in their daily lives and as long as they avoid confronting the<br />

fundamental sources of conflict, they cannot understand why they are irritated. In an unending cycle, they<br />

seek even greater sources of stimulus, desiring ‘more extreme choices’ or applaud those involved in a harsh<br />

battle over ‘right or wrong’ in place of them and further exhaust themselves.<br />

In recent years, in addition to a vague sense of anxiety or feelings of depression the reason for which they<br />

cannot explain, 90% of first-time patients visiting consultation rooms report feeling very irritated or as<br />

if they are about to lose their temper. That is, this feeling of depression does not develop into a deep and<br />

complex depression but quickly becomes feelings and behaviours that defy explanation such as irritation, a<br />

vague sadness or annoyance.<br />

In her book Why Psychoanalysis? (New York, Columbia University Press, 2003), French psychoanalyst<br />

Élisabeth Roudinesco states the following:<br />

Patients reject psychotherapy that takes a long time and demand that psychotherapists should cure<br />

them of their irritation and sadness very quickly. When the psychotherapist cautions them that this<br />

process will take time and that they need to discover their innermost self, a self that is completely<br />

360


unknown to them, they frown in displeasure and say that they do not have time for such things and<br />

that the psychotherapist must have some kind of device or medicine—something more ‘scientific’—<br />

that will help them get better more quickly. <strong>The</strong>y believe that a form of therapy that works quickly<br />

and gives visible and easy-to-understand results is more ‘scientific’. This provides another example<br />

of such patients’ using the emotional defence mechanisms highlighted in Chapter One.<br />

However, looking back through history, we see examples in which this type of efficient and rational thought<br />

pattern—one that fits well with contemporary society’s behaviours such as not thinking about what cannot<br />

be seen, impatience with processes and preferring simple bipartite choices—has brought about terrible<br />

mistakes. I refer here to tragedies brought about by despotism. Japan, too, has committed such mistakes.<br />

Conclusion<br />

To this point, I have attempted to explain the types of psychological conditions that have been imposed<br />

upon those people living in Japan since the economic bubble burst. <strong>The</strong>se psychological conditions are in<br />

general by no means ‘completely healthy’ from the psychiatric perspective, and it is unclear whether they<br />

cause or result from psychological abnormalities. However, I have clarified the following phenomena that<br />

currently exist in Japan:<br />

• <strong>The</strong> popularization of short sentence-type social media and the unquestioning belief of information<br />

derived through these<br />

• Launching an all-out attack on ‘enemies’ whom someone has identified<br />

• Forced bipartite choice to either completely agree or disagree with opinions on divisive types of<br />

issues<br />

• Expectations of a leader who makes everything simple and clear, hoping to rely on that leader to<br />

resolve all issues<br />

In discussing all these phenomena, I found that people experiencing strong anxiety and conflict do not<br />

attempt to confront their feelings and causes in order to gain insights into them, but they resort to ‘desperate<br />

measures’ in an attempt to maintain their emotional stability. Psychiatrists apply a variety of terms to this<br />

behaviour, including ‘rationalization’, ‘denial’, ‘manic defence’, ‘projective identification’ and ‘splitting.’<br />

<strong>The</strong>se psychological defence mechanisms were explained by such psychoanalysts as Sigmund Freud, Anna<br />

Freud and Melanie Klein.<br />

A problematic characteristic of these psychological defence mechanisms is that the people who use them<br />

do not realise that they are doing so. <strong>The</strong>y are also convinced that they are only opposing someone else’s<br />

361<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

unfair actions. During the course of clinical practice, we carefully explain to patients that they are not<br />

getting angry because of someone else’s unfair actions but because they are avoiding confronting their<br />

own problems by projecting problems within themselves on enemies in their immediate surroundings.<br />

Furthermore, the only solution to their problems is to strengthen and to resolve them and to help face their<br />

inner selves. This solution is what I mean by ‘gaining insights.’<br />

Of course, this process takes considerable time and effort and requires both the patient and the practitioner<br />

to experience certain ‘pains’. However, failure to complete this process will not solve the issues; no<br />

matter how many times they lash out at those they feel have wronged them, their action will provide only<br />

momentary relief.<br />

At the personal level, this type of incident may result in simply severing connections with the person at<br />

whom they have lashed out. However, things are different when it comes to society and other countries.<br />

Looking back through history, we find in all cases of war a type of logic based on psychological defence<br />

mechanisms, such as turning attention away from domestic anxieties or attacking another country to deny a<br />

decline in one’s own national strength.<br />

In her book, Even so, Japan Chose to go to War (Asahi Shuppansha, 2009), Japanese historian Yoko Kato<br />

states that when Japan entered the Pacific War—i.e. when it mounted a surprise attack on Pearl Harbour—<br />

its national strength, both military and economic, was that of ‘a country that could not fight a protracted<br />

war in any real sense’. She introduces someone who calmly reacts to these circumstances, ‘believed that if<br />

Japan could not fight a protracted war, it should have acknowledged from the outset that it could not enter<br />

this war’. Hironori Mizuno, a military critic despite his experience as a navy captain, advocated pacifism at<br />

the end of the Taisho period/early Showa period, an era of pervasive militarism.<br />

However, with his ‘extremely decent opinions’, Mizuno chose to criticise the war and ignore contemporary<br />

military authorities. He stated that ‘Japan has lost its capability to engage in an unaided war. However,<br />

much it expands its navy armaments during times of peace, in the end it amounts to little more than a house<br />

built of cards’. To quote Kato:<br />

[…] [C]itizens do not take discussions of this kind seriously. <strong>The</strong> discussion soon moves on to other<br />

subjects. We cannot fight a protracted war; therefore, do we use a geographical pincer movement<br />

on the Soviet Union, or do we make a pre-emptive strike? In other words, it becomes a two-way<br />

choice.’<br />

362


Why do military authorities and citizens fail to take discussions of this type seriously and move on to<br />

other subjects? Why did they frame this foolish choice in which, although the country could not endure<br />

a protracted war, events proceeded in a war-like direction with a final decision to initiate a pre-emptive<br />

strike, regardless of the facts? It would seem that behind this course of action was a psychological defence<br />

mechanism in which Japan ignored its anxieties, fears and trepidation, and convinced itself that it was those<br />

‘fiendish Americans and British’ who were in the wrong and that Japan was completely in the right and had<br />

limitless power (Remark 2).<br />

At the individual level, this defence mechanism may simply mean an end to relations with the person<br />

attacked, but it can lead to tragedies such as the Pacific War at the national level. Similar decisions were<br />

driven by this same mechanism that may have been made throughout history; however, we are not talking<br />

here about events that occurred a thousand years ago or on the other side of the world. <strong>The</strong> Pacific War<br />

occurred a mere several decades ago in Japan, within the lifetime of those now experiencing the economic<br />

crisis.<br />

Human beings mobilise psychological defence mechanisms unconsciously and without understanding this<br />

process, and so they continue to vehemently deny that they are doing so. Because they fail to realise what<br />

they are doing, they sometimes make terrible mistakes and irrational decisions, thus causing disastrous<br />

tragedies.<br />

To repeat, this is human nature. Although Freud first identified the Oedipus Complex in Greek drama, it<br />

is the source of a range of behaviours and symptoms that constitute the unchanging essence of humanity<br />

across all of recorded history. At the subconscious level that is our core, people do not change so easily.<br />

Some might argue that although this mechanism might have driven the decision to begin the Pacific<br />

War, we would not make such an ill-considered decision in the 21st century. This line of reasoning is<br />

unpersuasive because it ignores the operation of the subconscious defence mechanism. After all, we must<br />

remember that projecting one’s latent anxieties and fears onto the outside world and attempting to attack<br />

and destroy them in that context results in only momentary feelings of wellbeing.<br />

With this behaviour’s characteristics in mind, how should we attempt to resolve these issues? In present-<br />

day society, when a person states their opinion, others expect them to present concrete proposals or<br />

counterproposals when refuting another’s opinion. Although this expectation might at first glance appear to<br />

be constructive, as we have said, it is also in some ways a pathological response.<br />

Thus, by merely stating that the behaviours and events that currently occur in society result from<br />

psychological defence mechanisms and that we must be aware of this process, which strikes me as<br />

363<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

somewhat irresponsible unless one further offers concrete proposals to resolve this problem. <strong>The</strong>refore, I<br />

propose the following strategies:<br />

(1) Knowing history<br />

As stated above, human beings do not change easily, even over the course of centuries. <strong>The</strong>y repeat the<br />

same mistakes time and again. In Kato’s aforementioned book, she states the following:<br />

I ardently wish to be able to draw upon a wide range of case studies from among the information I<br />

have obtained, find the most appropriate one and select instances from history and use them.<br />

Furthermore, drawing upon the ideas of historian Ernest May, she appeals to administrators to ‘want to<br />

know about history’. I also think that understanding history is desirable. Members of the general public<br />

may be caught up in work and their daily lives and they lack time to reflect upon history; despite this<br />

situation—or perhaps precisely because of it—society’s leaders need to examine history and learn from it.<br />

(2) Exercising one’s imagination<br />

<strong>The</strong> fact that we live in a world in which vast sums of money travel around the globe in an instant, in<br />

activities such as online trading, does not mean that we need to make every decision instantly. In this paper,<br />

I have highlighted the dangers of becoming excessively drawn into the world of finance or the Internet and<br />

making instantaneous judgments and decisions.<br />

Furthermore, a simple pair of opposing options is not appropriate for resolving every issue; instead, such<br />

a limited either/or choice forces us to declare a position with which we agree only in part, when the best<br />

option may actually be neither of those presented.<br />

By underpinning people’s statements and behaviours, we find a number of hidden reasons, backgrounds<br />

and internal motives that make them say or do things. Even an email that simply says ‘Okay’ might<br />

represent involved irresolution or a complex sequence of events leading to that decision. We need to<br />

develop greater empathy for what people are thinking and we need to use our imagination both for<br />

that empathy and for resolving problems. <strong>The</strong> assumption that a person’s verbal statements or physical<br />

behaviours represent the sum total of that person can lead to serious misunderstandings, which, in the<br />

societal or national context, develop into senseless wars and tragedies.<br />

364


(3) Writing things down<br />

We must now ask by what means we should develop empathy for others’ thoughts and feelings and<br />

consider them during the appropriately deliberative process of making judgments.<br />

While there is no method for achieving this goal, I feel that diligently writing things down would be useful.<br />

Furthermore, rather than simply reporting things objectively, it is important to participate while observing<br />

and creating what in anthropological terms is called an ethnographic account.<br />

In his book, Clinical Writing: An Ethnography for Psychiatric Nurses (Igaku Shoin, 2008), Kazumasa<br />

Matsuzawa recommends that rather than recording objective data on a medical card like a doctor, the ward<br />

nurses use such ethnographic accounts to create records while maintaining deep involvement with patients.<br />

He advises the following:<br />

As stated, in providing care to patients, we nurses daily experience a range of sympathetic and<br />

emotional types of fatigue. Sometimes the exhaustion is overwhelming and we feel crushed by the<br />

burden; sometimes we just stand there wordlessly; sometimes we become angry; and, at other times<br />

we can do nothing and are at our wit’s end; at still other times we feel a bit of joy in our hearts.<br />

Matsuzawa continues with an ‘even so …’ and asserts, ‘I believe that new issues remain as they were in<br />

how we locate, evaluate and treat the significance of these feelings in nurses’ subjective domain for specific<br />

nursing activities’.<br />

Because of this situation, we need to describe all aspects of these events and ‘explain the complex elements<br />

and contexts that constitute them through detailed ethnographic investigations and reconstructions’.<br />

I believe that recording one’s own feeling—including negative ones—while recognizing and accepting<br />

them allows one to reflect upon them and reconstruct reality from that basis.<br />

This method, I feel, is valid—even essential—not only for those in the nursing profession but also in our<br />

daily lives.<br />

Records such as 140-character long Twitter messages or photographs posted on Facebook as a record of the<br />

day’s events are not valid substitutes. We need to take sufficient time in our lives to think about things. And<br />

above all else, we also need a bit of courage to honestly confront the feelings that arise from this process.<br />

<strong>The</strong> key to the entire process is our decision to exhibit this bit of courage. Although that alone may seem an<br />

365<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

extremely small choice, I believe it will result in important improvements.<br />

In psychoanalysis, there is the theory of “projective identification”. It is a term first used by Melanie<br />

Klein to describe a process whereby parts of the ego are thought of as forced into another person who is<br />

then expected to become identified with whatever has been projected. Japanese young people with strong<br />

anxiety choose friends, themselves, and foreigners as obvious target. That is, “projective identification” is<br />

one of bad way of healing that they found by themselves.<br />

Next, I would like to point out another curious phenomenon in Japan.<br />

It is the booming of New Age science. Especially there are many books by native Japanese authors on<br />

questions of spiritual energy, spiritual awakening and life after death. <strong>The</strong> various Japanese terms for<br />

‘spiritual’ and ‘spirituality’ have become more and more popular, although it is difficult to discern what<br />

they actually mean. However, every year many incidents and troubles occur related to fake or evil “spiritual<br />

counsellors”.<br />

If they are not fake and evil, there are still serious problems. People sometimes depend on their counsellor<br />

deeply, so they cannot decide anything by themselves. I think it also one of the ways of healing which is<br />

not suitable.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n what is the better solution for these serious social symptoms? I think it is no way to heal the people<br />

without facing their inner anxiety or fear for the own society and the features.<br />

In psychoanalysis, insight is a process whereby one grasps a previously misunderstood aspect of one’s own<br />

mental dynamics. It refers to a specific moment, observable during the treatment, when the patient becomes<br />

aware of an inner conflict, an instinctual impulse, a defence, or the like, that was previously repressed or<br />

disavowed and that, when it emerges into consciousness, elicits surprise and a sense of discovery.<br />

This will be a hard way and it takes long time to get insight for every young people in Japan and other<br />

countries, however it is the last chance to achieve not the current diversion or comfort but the true healing.<br />

366


Healing Practices in the <strong>Humanities</strong>: A Search in Progress<br />

Jeanette Fourie<br />

Lyndi Fourie Foundation<br />

This South African journey from Physiotherapy lecturer at University of Cape Town to a Quantum<br />

Energy Coach has been initially excruciating and now an exciting adventure. It started with the death of<br />

our daughter Lyndi in Dec 1993 at the hands of the Azanian Peoples Liberation Army. <strong>The</strong> multiple roads<br />

to find healing for myself and for the men who were directly responsible for her death, now includes<br />

a passion for healing for all ex-combatants in SA who still suffer from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder<br />

(PTSD).<br />

Eighteen years since South Africa embarked on a democratic government with Nelson Mandela at the<br />

helm, and the apartheid autocracy at an end, we are experiencing growing poverty, crime, corruption and<br />

political uncertainty.<br />

This paper will cover my personal journey with regard to helpful modalities of healing experienced by<br />

myself and then extrapolate the possibilities of using these in; communities, workplaces, national and<br />

universal settings.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Truth and Reconciliation Commission (1995-1998) started the process of conciliation in South<br />

Africa, where in spite of many positive results; it has left a trail of unhappy people in the wake of having<br />

their wounds reopened without repair, in itself a further trauma. Psychological assistance was offered to<br />

survivors, however, it is not honoured by African Traditional beliefs, nor by many who consider therapy<br />

to indicate that one suffers from mental instability, and so went largely unused. Political perpetrators were<br />

not offered any therapeutic assistance, even after receiving amnesty.<br />

I appeared at the Commission of enquiry which dealt with our daughter’s death and found it helpful, in<br />

that I could hear the young men who attacked and witness their recounting of the chants of delight that<br />

367<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

evening en route to the Heidelberg Tavern. <strong>The</strong>y were saving their people and South Africa from ongoing<br />

oppression and their supporters cheered and laughed. It was difficult to hear their joy in the context of our<br />

daughter’s death. I took the opportunity to tell them who Lyndi was and that she could have been their<br />

friend, working for change in SA. Now she is dead!<br />

This paper will cover the theory of trauma, healing courses which I have attended and trained in to find<br />

help for those suffering from (PTSD) and the resultant addictions, and abuse to which their families<br />

are subject. <strong>The</strong> most recent Healing of Beliefs through Quantum Energy Coaching is a remarkable,<br />

uncomplicated, and fast way of transforming the lives of individuals, their families and I trust also their<br />

communities, our nations and the world.<br />

Rabbi Twerski a professor of psychiatry at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and medical<br />

director of the Gateway Rehabilitation Centre in Pittsburgh USA is quoted in the South African Sunday<br />

Independent Newspaper of 4 September 2005 as saying<br />

“After half a century in psychiatric practice, I know without a doubt that the source of addiction<br />

is spiritual deficiency. Irrespective of whether we are religious or atheist, all human beings are<br />

spiritual by nature and spirituality is the cornerstone of our recovery”. A patient of Twerski’s helped<br />

him to understand that the cure to addiction was not to be found in the medical or psychiatric realm<br />

because the source of addiction does not lie there. It goes without saying that Twerski strongly<br />

urges people suffering from addiction problems to join Alcoholics Anonymous or a recovery<br />

programme based on the Twelve Steps. “<strong>The</strong>se are spiritual growth programmes that nurture the<br />

development of self-esteem and self-forgiveness, which are the essential ingredients of happiness”<br />

he states. It is about overcoming strong emotions like anger and resentment that destroy the<br />

spiritual nature of human beings and drive millions of people towards addiction.<br />

What is Twerski referring to by the spiritual nature of human beings? If Twerski is correct what is it that<br />

we need to direct our energy towards in order to facilitate healing from addiction?<br />

<strong>The</strong> American Heritage Dictionary (1975) defines spiritual as: 1. Of, relating to, consisting of or having<br />

the nature of spirit; not tangible or material. 2. Of, concerned with, or affecting the soul. 3. Of, from, or<br />

pertaining to God; deific. 4. Of or belonging to a church or religion; ecclesiastical; sacred. 5. Pertaining to<br />

or having the nature of spirits; supernatural […] 9. <strong>The</strong> emotional nature in man as distinguished from his<br />

mind and intellect.<br />

Soul is defined as: 1. <strong>The</strong> animating and vital principle in man credited with the faculties of thought,<br />

368


action, and emotion and conceived as forming an immaterial entity distinguished from but temporally<br />

coexistent with his body. 2. <strong>The</strong>ology. <strong>The</strong> spiritual nature of man considered in relation to God, regarded<br />

as immortal, separable from the body at death, and susceptible to happiness or misery in a future state. 3.<br />

<strong>The</strong> disembodied spirit of a dead human being; a ghost; shade.<br />

Wikipedia has a broader and more recent and embracing approach to defining spirituality: Spirituality<br />

is belief in an ultimate or an alleged immaterial reality 1 ; an inner path enabling a person to discover the<br />

essence of his/her being; or the ‘deepest values and meanings by which people live.’ 2 Spiritual practices,<br />

including meditation, prayer and contemplation, are intended to develop an individual’s inner life.<br />

Spiritual experiences can include being connected to a larger reality, yielding a more comprehensive self;<br />

joining with other individuals or the human community; with nature or the cosmos; or with the divine<br />

realm. 3 Spirituality is often experienced as a source of inspiration or orientation in life. 4 It can encompass<br />

belief in immaterial realities or experiences of the immanent or transcendent nature of the world.<br />

Considering Twerski’s statement that addiction is the ‘deficiency of spirituality’, Is it likely that the<br />

disconnection of the human from self, others and the Divine, or centre of the Universe is the challenge we<br />

face? And how do we facilitate connection with self, other and transcendence or connection with a greater<br />

power?<br />

I discovered personally how this happens as an adult, when hurt and pain are a constant part of one’s daily<br />

life. Mine was the experience of abuse as a woman and the death of Lyndi. Imagine how much more<br />

serious this hurt and pain of abuse and violence is as a child. I have formulated a law of humanness in an<br />

attempt to understand this process; and then added the experience of others in relation to the role of trauma<br />

and violence.<br />

A Law of humanness<br />

I know for my own self, that when I have been hurt, I hurt back. At times in the most unconscious<br />

(unplanned) way - I call this the law of humanness - it tends to perpetuate hurt, which can get way out<br />

1 Ewert Cousins, preface to Antoine Faivre and Jacob Needleman, Modern Esoteric Spirituality, Crossroad Publishing,<br />

1992.<br />

2 Philip Sheldrake, A Brief History of Spirituality, Wiley-Blackwell 2007, pp. 1-2.<br />

3 Margaret A. Burkhardt and Mary Gail Nagai-Jacobson Spirituality: Living our Connectedness, Delmar Cengage Learning,<br />

2001, p. xiii.<br />

4 Kees Waaijman, Spirituality: Forms, Foundations, Methods. Leuven: Peeters, 2002, p. 1.<br />

369<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

of hand. Richard Holloway 5 says it like this: “We seem to have a wired-in instinct for retributive justice,<br />

for getting even with those who cause us hurt. If we are too weak to take straightforward revenge, we<br />

sometimes find surreptitious ways of getting back at our tormentors.” Like doing and saying unspeakable<br />

things behind the backs of those who dominate and bully us, or rationalise the taking of pens or more<br />

from the workplace where relationships are less than collaborative and the boss too wealthy anyway! This<br />

understanding has led me to believe that evil is ‘exercising our potential to hurt ourselves and others.’<br />

James Gilligan 6 , a psychiatrist who worked for over two decades in the Massachusetts prison system<br />

with the most violent prisoners and the criminally insane, found that shame and then guilt are the deadly<br />

emotions which cause violence (See Hawkins, Map of Consciousness, p.10). Shame works to deaden<br />

the feelings of being human, and it is the breeding ground of rage. Unfortunately the retributive justice<br />

practiced in most prison systems causes more shame and humiliation. Shame a boy in his home, shame<br />

a group in its neighborhood and you are likely to get responses you don’t like. Shame a petty criminal<br />

in prison, and you may get a serial murderer after his term has been served. Gilligan’s perspective is not<br />

aimed at having us pardon those who have broken the law; he believes that understanding the causes of<br />

this epidemic of violence is the first step towards preventing it for future generations.<br />

Richard Rhodes 7 recounts research done by Lonnie Athens who experienced the trauma of a home where<br />

his father beat and demeaned his mother and siblings. As an adult Athens did research in prisons to find<br />

out: Why they kill? This is the result of that research which nearly cost him his life when a prisoner<br />

attacked him:<br />

Four stages of violentization Prevention<br />

1. Brutalization – seeing others suffer violence. Stop physical punishment of children<br />

Personal horrification (father on mother is the as acceptable behaviour<br />

worst - because of the confusion with loving)<br />

2. Belligerence – A response to powerlessness Mobilise support rather than isolating<br />

picked up at home, school or in neighbourhood and rejecting the child<br />

3. Violent Performance – exultant, proud to be Provide alternative means of dealing<br />

5 Holloway R. On Forgiveness - How can We Forgive the Unforgiveable? Edinburgh, Scotland: Canongate Books, 2002.<br />

6 Gilligan J. Violence - Our Deadly Epidemic and Its Causes. New York, USA: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1996.<br />

7 Rhodes Richard. Why <strong>The</strong>y Kill – <strong>The</strong> Discoveries of a Maverick Criminologist, Vintage Publishers, USA. 2000.<br />

370


seen as a celebrity by peers – gang support with inner and outer conflict<br />

4. Enjoys the sense of success as a dangerous Difficult to remediate – because - -<br />

celebrity, becomes a decision / choice to act empathy is seriously diminished<br />

Malevolently.<br />

Athens suggests that this is not an inevitable process, it happens over time. He expresses gratitude to a<br />

neighbour who picked up on his personal trauma at home (Stage 2) and mentored him through school and<br />

encouraged his university participation. However, unfortunately the struggles with self-esteem persisted<br />

throughout his adult life.<br />

This work supports the notion of ‘restorative justice’ rather than ‘punitive justice’ for youth who are in<br />

trouble at home, school and with the law.<br />

Violence is also given recognition and acceptance in society via the justice system. <strong>The</strong> English political<br />

theorist Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) was the first modern thinker to argue for the creation of a more<br />

‘rational’ and therefore a more ‘economical’ order of violence backed by popular consent rather than<br />

divine right. Through a social contract individuals transfer their ‘natural right’ to exercise power through<br />

violence to a common sovereign authority (the state) which claims a monopoly on the use of violence. 8<br />

8 Realpolitik refers to the idea that the essence of politics consists of a ceaseless struggle for power,<br />

material goods, and the control of the means of violence. 9<br />

This suggests that ‘civilised society’ depends on the state to avenge our murderous hurt, and to consider<br />

those who take it into their own hands to be either sick or savage. War would be further evidence of our<br />

right to take revenge - the law of humanness plus the structural violence of the state, despite horrendous<br />

carnage and the perpetuation of hate and violence on both sides. This has been witnessed recently in<br />

USA’s response to the Twin Towers attack, the ongoing Middle Eastern conflict, Ireland and many African<br />

States: Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda and Sudan<br />

Quantum Physics: a new understanding and its implications<br />

I grew up in a strict Christian home, where the prophetess Ellen White in the mid 1800’s was inspired<br />

8 Jacoby Susan. Wild Justice: <strong>The</strong> Evolution of Revenge, Harper and Row, USA, 1984.<br />

9 Steger MB. Peacebuilding and Nonviolence: Gandhi’s Perspective on Power. Christie D, Wagner RV, DuNann Winter D,<br />

Editors. Peace Conflict and Violence, Peace Psychology for the 21st Century.New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall Inc., 2001.<br />

371<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

with a ‘health message’ for the Seventh Day Adventist Church. <strong>The</strong> principles which she espoused were<br />

indicators for healthful living they were counter to the popular life style. <strong>The</strong>se principles have now been<br />

scientifically demonstrated over the years to be both valid and valuable. White wrote many times about<br />

the importance of the mind-body-spirit connection. However, as a physiotherapist with conventional<br />

anatomy and physiology training this was not apparent. I have searched for evidence of this connection<br />

and now resonate with the explanation of quantum physics and energy healing.<br />

Dawson 10 explores the background in order to explain Matrix Reimprinting, an energy healing technique<br />

using tapping on the face and upper body, which is known as Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT). I will<br />

use his work to summarise the concept.<br />

A basic understanding of the science of the Matrix or Field was brought to light in the 1940’s by the father<br />

of quantum theory, Max Planck. Until then Newtonian physics had taught us that matter is solid and<br />

energy is a separate entity, furthermore, it was thought that space was a vacuum. Quantum energy theory<br />

has discovered that:<br />

• <strong>The</strong> world is not solid. It is actually composed of electromagnetic energy, which in turn is<br />

composed of various atomic and subatomic particles. Our solid world is in fact an illusion –<br />

underlying it is a vibrational reality. It is fact that the particles that we are comprised of vibrate<br />

so fast makes us appear solid. An analogy we like to use is the electrical fan: when it stops,<br />

you can see the gaps in between the blades, but when it spins, it appears to be one solid object.<br />

Similarly, as the atoms which make up our physiology vibrate, we appear to be a single entity,<br />

but really we are energy in motion.<br />

• We are linked by a web. Part of the previous scientific paradigm included the presupposition<br />

that up to 90 percent of our cosmos was comprised of empty space. In <strong>The</strong> Divine Matrix,<br />

Gregg Braden 11 points out the flaw in this logic: If it is really vacant, then there’s a big question<br />

that must be answered: How can the waves of energy that transmit everything from our cell-<br />

phone calls to the reflected bright light bringing this page’s words to your eyes travel from<br />

one place to another? Just as water carries ripples away from the place where a stone is tossed<br />

into a pond, something must exist that conveys the vibrations of life from one point to another.<br />

Quantum physics has taught us that what once was believed to be empty space contains the<br />

great net that connects everything in our universe: the Matrix (Divine).<br />

10 Dawson Karl and Allenby Sasha. Matrix Reimprinting using EFT. Rewrite your Past,Transform you Future. Hay House.<br />

2010, p. 4.<br />

11 Braden Gregg. <strong>The</strong> Divine Matrix. Hay House. 2007, p. 26.<br />

372


• We send our thoughts out and they are attracted back. Our understanding of this<br />

unified energy field has also brought with it the knowledge that we are creators of our own<br />

realities, because what we focus on sends ripples into the Matrix that reflect back to us in our<br />

experiences. <strong>The</strong> film and book <strong>The</strong> Secret by Rhonda Byrne and works by Esther and Jerry<br />

Hicks such as Ask and It is Given have awakened countless people to the understanding that<br />

we get what we focus upon in life. Many of us have now learned that the universe responds to<br />

consciousness and our thoughts become our reality. Our beliefs, fears, hopes and dreams are<br />

all reflected back to us by the Matrix in the world that surrounds us. This ‘Law of Attraction’<br />

is vibrational. We attract experiences of a vibrational frequency that is similar to our own.<br />

Whatever we are putting out comes back to us in a life experience that matches our own signal.<br />

To some people, the idea that we ‘create our own reality’ in this way has seemed offensive.<br />

This is because it may be seen as putting blame on those who have created a reality which<br />

is less than desirable. However, as we will explore later, much of what we attract is related<br />

to our earlier life experiences and we can change our point of attraction by directly working<br />

with these experiences. So we are not to blame for the reality we have created, but rather<br />

empowered to do something about this reality with this knowledge and understanding.<br />

• We can change how we experience life. As well as the unified energy field that connects all<br />

beings, there are also local fields around our own body which shape not only our physical form<br />

but also our behaviours, our customs and our habits. <strong>The</strong>se fields are different from the Matrix,<br />

because they are local to us. But at the same time they are sub-fields that are part of the Matrix<br />

(Divine). This explains how we are all interconnected to each other and to the Matrix (author’s<br />

addition). Dawson suggests that these local fields may be the same as the subconscious mind.<br />

In relation to this, we would like to offer a unique view on why the Law of Attraction hasn’t appeared to<br />

work for some people. All the life experiences that we have had create pictures/beliefs in our local field. If<br />

they are positive and supportive, they help us to attract more of what we want. But if they are negative and<br />

destructive, we attract more of the same. Simply wishing for different experiences when we have these<br />

destructive pictures/beliefs in our field will not change our point of attraction.<br />

Changing behavioural fields. As well as shaping form, fields also shape sociological patterns, customs,<br />

behaviour and habits of mind. <strong>The</strong>y impose rhythmic patterns on the nervous system which affect the<br />

sensory and motor regions of the brain, impacting behaviours. 12 Every species, including humans, has<br />

some sort of inherent instinctive behaviour. We learn this through morphic resonance with the members<br />

12 Sheldrake Rupert. <strong>The</strong> Presence of the Past, Inner Traditions. Bear and company. 2000, p. 198.<br />

373<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

of our species who have gone before us. Learned behaviour is different, and becomes established through<br />

resonance with ourselves. Our morphic fields become habituated when we repeat certain patterns and<br />

behaviour. Learned behaviour and the fields that accompany it are in fact an important part of our<br />

socialization process. <strong>The</strong>re would be no structure in our life without these fields. Every form of behaviour<br />

from the simple act of brushing our teeth to the more complex one of communicating with members of<br />

the opposite sex has its own field which has been created by our life experiences and is reinforced by self-<br />

resonance.<br />

Many of these behavioural fields may be supportive and nurturing. If, for example, your life is structured<br />

and organized then you have probably formed positive behavioural fields around functioning. If your life<br />

lacks structure then your behavioural fields may be more chaotic. And if you have very obsessive qualities<br />

about being ordered or are even expressing a condition such as obsessive compulsive disorder, your<br />

behavioural fields around being organized have become too strong.<br />

So how do we change our behaviour? We have all heard the saying “You can’t teach an old dog new<br />

tricks.” This refers to the challenging nature of changing a behavioural field. Say there is something you<br />

want to change about yourself and you believe this time you really can do it. You may tell everyone you<br />

are going to do it. You set a date, and put all your energetic resources into changing. You have a good first<br />

day. You feel confident and may even talk about your success. This goes on for a few days or even weeks.<br />

You might even think you have conquered your bad habit. If it’s eating chocolate, you might think it’s OK<br />

to have just a little bit now and then. If it’s exercising regularly, for example you might think it’s OK to<br />

skip it once or twice, isn’t it? Or it may be that someone has upset you, so you justify slipping back into<br />

old ways just for a while, to get over it. It’s a temporary blip anyway. You’ll be back on track tomorrow.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n, bang, you’ll be straight back into the old pattern and back to square one. Sound familiar?<br />

What is really happening here? <strong>The</strong> more you repeat something, the stronger its field becomes. So if<br />

you have a long-standing way of behaving, its resonance has great strength, and thus a great influence over<br />

you. When you decide with energy into this decision and actively make the change, you start to tune into<br />

a new field, an opposing field if you like. Consider this in relation to Sheldrake’s remark: ‘A field brings<br />

about material effects while the system is tuned into it. But if the tuning is changed then other fields come<br />

into play: the original field disappears.’ By tuning into this new field you feel completely different. <strong>The</strong><br />

new field has its own resonance and you may feel confident, sure and able to because of this resonance.<br />

However, if you decide, too soon, that you have ‘cracked it’ and you believe, too early, that this new field<br />

is totally stable, you may slip back into your old ways with all the confidence that you have from the<br />

resonance of the new field. <strong>The</strong> trouble is that as soon as you do slip back you tune into the old field – that<br />

old field that resonates so strongly with you.<br />

374


It is very challenging to change behaviour with willpower alone, because willpower comes from the<br />

conscious mind, and the conscious mind does not override the subconscious, or the fields, In fact, we<br />

believe that the subconscious mind and the fields may be one and the same thing. So what’s the solution?<br />

With Matrix Reimprinting a unique Field – Clearing Technique helps to tune into and stabilise new fields.<br />

Quantum Energy Coaching puts new beliefs into the subconscious/local field which move the old negative<br />

images of self out of the field and result in new attractor patterns, but one will still needs to take action for<br />

life to truly transform.<br />

Trauma and the Freeze Response. We frequently talk about the flight-or-fight response; the freeze<br />

response is mentioned rarely and understood less. In fact it is often inaccurately seen as a sign of<br />

weakness. One feels shamed that ‘I didn’t fight back’, ‘I should have run away’, I didn’t move, I just let it<br />

happen.’ Yet the freeze response is a biological state which is designed to aid our survival. Wild animals<br />

when surviving a chase by predators, demonstrate the freeze by dropping to the ground and then tremble<br />

or shake, with deep breathing and perspiring. After doing so it will get up, shake itself off and apparently<br />

be none the worse for its ordeal. By doing this it seems that it has released all unconscious memory of the<br />

attack. We are different: we don’t discharge the freeze response. In fact, if we shake after a traumatic event<br />

we are often encouraged to calm down, some take a drink to calm their nerves. Because of this, we store<br />

the trauma, instead. David Berceli 13 has developed an exercise routine called Trauma Release Exercise<br />

(TRE) which release the chronic tension in all the muscles concerned with tremor, which are mainly<br />

located in the pelvis and lower back area. Chronic contracted muscles here are one of the major causes of<br />

low back pain. <strong>The</strong>se exercises can actually lead to relief from chronic pain.<br />

<strong>The</strong> understanding of the ‘quantum connection’ as in mind-body-spirit has been explored by Bruce<br />

Lipton 14 . As a cell biologist whilst working at Stanford, he was cloning stem cells several decades before<br />

this field came to the forefront of science. From his work he made some significant discoveries. He has<br />

shown that genetics (DNA) does not control biology in the way it has been supposed. ‘Environmental<br />

signals’ are primarily responsible for selecting the genes expressed by an organism. Most people<br />

believe that the conscious mind controls our physiology, but in fact, almost all of it is controlled by the<br />

subconscious mind, which has data processing power perhaps a million times greater than the conscious<br />

mind, and is in charge as much as 99 percent of all our activity.<br />

Apparently the human energy field both permeates the entire body and radiates to the outside, meters<br />

13 Berceli David. Trauma Release Exercises: A Revolutionary New Method for Stress/Trauma Release. BookSurge<br />

Publishers. 2005.<br />

14 Lipton Bruce. Biology of Belief – Unleashing the Power of Consciousness. Hay House Inc. 2005.<br />

375<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

beyond the body’s surface. According to Lipton every cell has an antenna tuned into signals broadcast by<br />

the mind as well as the environment. Perceived danger causes physical bracing and psychological bracing<br />

so that our belief systems include patterns of protective behaviour. This can result in a state of chronic<br />

stress which holds the body in the ‘freeze response’ and reduces the immune response.<br />

Lipton shares a radically new understanding which has emerged at the cutting edge of cell science. It<br />

is now recognized that the environment, and more specifically, our perception (interpretation) of the<br />

environment, directly controls the activity of our genes. Environment controls gene activity through a<br />

process known as epigenetic control. This new perspective of human biology does not view the body<br />

as just a mechanical device, but rather incorporates the role of the mind and spirit. This breakthrough in<br />

biology is fundamental in all healing for it recognizes that when we change our perceptions or beliefs we<br />

send totally different messages to our cells and reprogram their expression. This explains how people can<br />

have spontaneous remissions or recover from injuries deemed to be permanent disabilities.<br />

It also answers my question, at least more satisfactorily than any previous explanation of the mind, body<br />

and spirit connection.<br />

David Hawkins 15 describes a map of consciousness which has been formulated through kinesiological<br />

testing of many thousands of people. As we look at the Map of Consciousness, it becomes clear that the<br />

calibrated levels correlate with specific processes of consciousness – emotions, perceptions, or attitudes,<br />

worldviews and spiritual beliefs.<br />

<strong>The</strong> critical response point in the scale of consciousness calibrates at level 200, which is the level<br />

associated with integrity and courage. All attitudes, thoughts feelings, associations, entities, or historical<br />

figures below that level of calibration make a person go weak when tested with kinesiology. Those that<br />

calibrate higher than 200 go strong. This is the balance point between weak and strong attractors, between<br />

negative and positive influence.<br />

At levels below 200, the primary impetus is personal survival, although at the very bottom of the scale<br />

– the zone of hopelessness and depression – even this motive is lacking. <strong>The</strong> higher levels of Fear and<br />

Anger are characterized by egocentric impulses arising from this drive for personal survival. At the level<br />

of Pride, the survival motive may expand to comprehend the survival of others as well. As one crosses<br />

the demarcation between negative and positive influence into Courage, the well-being of others becomes<br />

15 Hawkins DR. Power vs Force – <strong>The</strong> Hidden Determinants of Human Behavior. Hay House, USA. 2002.<br />

376


increasingly important. By the 500 level, the happiness of others emerges as the essential motivating force.<br />

<strong>The</strong> high 500s are characterized by interest in spiritual awareness for both oneself and others, and by the<br />

600s, the good of mankind and the search for enlightenment are the primary goals. From 700 to 1,000, life<br />

is dedicated to the salvation of all of humanity.<br />

Reflection on this map can bring about a profound expansion of one’s empathy for life in its variety of<br />

expressions. If we examine ostensibly less ‘virtuous’ emotional attitudes, we realize they’re neither good<br />

nor bad; moralistic judgments are merely a function of the viewpoint from which they proceed. <strong>The</strong><br />

empathy derived from contemplating this Map of Consciousness will hopefully make the path to Joy a<br />

shorter one. <strong>The</strong> key to Joy is unconditional kindness to all life, including one’s own, which we refer to<br />

as compassion. Without compassion, little if any significance is ever accomplished in human endeavour.<br />

We may generalize to the greater social context from individual therapies, wherein the patient can’t be<br />

truly cured or fundamentally healed until he invokes the power of compassion, both for himself and<br />

others. At that point, the healed may become a healer, a wounded healer.<br />

A Map of Consciousness<br />

God View Life View Level Log Emotion Process<br />

Self Is Enlightened 700-1000 Ineffable Pure Consciousness<br />

All-Being Perfect Peace 600 Bliss Illumination<br />

One Complete Joy 540 Serenity Transfiguration<br />

Loving Benign Love 500 Reverence Revelation<br />

Wise Meaningful Reason 400 Understanding Abstraction<br />

Merciful Harmonious Acceptance 350 Forgiveness Transcendence<br />

Inspiring Hopeful Willingness 310 Optimism Intention<br />

Enabling Satisfactory Neutrality 250 Trust Release<br />

Permitting Feasible Courage 200 Affirmation Empowerment<br />

Indifferent Demanding Pride 175 Scorn Inflation<br />

Vengeful Antagonistic Anger 150 Hate Aggression<br />

Denying Disappointing Desire 125 Craving Enslavement<br />

Punitive Frightening Fear 100 Anxiety Withdrawal<br />

Disdainful Tragic Grief 75 Regret Despondency<br />

Condemning Hopeless Apathy 50 Despair Abdication<br />

Vindictive Evil Guilt 30 Blame Destruction<br />

Despising Miserable Shame 20 Humiliation Elimination<br />

377<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

From 200 down increased use of force. From 200 up increased use of authentic power.<br />

My personal journey into the healing arts, started with Physiotherapy as an eighteen year old, I practiced<br />

my profession with fulfilment and the enjoyment of facilitating healing for clients and then, learning for<br />

students at the University of Cape Town. After Lyndi’s death, I discovered the richness of forgiveness and<br />

conciliation and spent time on a doctoral degree studying the process that I had experienced. In 2004 I did<br />

a course in ‘Capacitar.’ <strong>The</strong> facilitator was also the originator and a most inspirational person by the name<br />

of Patricia Cane. Cane had been a nun, and has subsequently devoted her life to popular education in the<br />

healing Arts through Capacitar. This introduction prepared me for the cutting edge Energy work to follow.<br />

I have listed conventional Psychiatric and Clinical Psychology, as well as Spiral Dynamics to present an<br />

inclusive picture of possible modalities. However, I concur with Twerski that for PTSD and specifically<br />

addictions the Energy work is more powerful. In particular TRE and QEC to which considerable space<br />

has been devoted in this paper.<br />

• CONVENTIONAL MEDICAL, PSYCHIATRIC AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPERTISE<br />

Addiction is a treatable condition. <strong>The</strong> first phase of treatment is withdrawal from the problem substance/<br />

activity. <strong>The</strong>re are both physical and psychological effects that occur when substance-taking stops,<br />

including such physical signs as nausea and vomiting, chills and sweats, muscle cramps and aches,<br />

sleeplessness, shifts in heart rate, even fever. Emotional effects include depression, anxiety, irritability,<br />

and mood swings. Withdrawal symptoms typically last for three to five days. While they are rarely life-<br />

threatening, medical supervision is usually provided in residential treatment programs, and medications<br />

may be given to ameliorate the acute discomfort of withdrawal.<br />

Behavioral therapy and counseling are important elements of treatment. Cognitive behavioral therapy<br />

is often used to help patients identify, avoid, and cope with situations in which they are most likely to<br />

abuse drugs or activities. <strong>The</strong> technique of motivational interviewing is often employed to remind people<br />

of their values, as a way of avoiding use. Family therapy may be provided to help the patient maintain a<br />

supportive environment and improve family functioning. Rehabilitation programs are often needed to help<br />

patients regain necessary job and other skills.<br />

www.psychologytoday.com/basics/addiction/treatment<br />

• THERAPEUTIC SPIRAL MODEL<br />

Safety and Containment with Action Methods<br />

378


<strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapeutic Spiral Model (TSM) was developed to address the limitations of both talk and action<br />

therapies (Hudgins, 2002, 2000). TSM provides helping professionals with rapid, safe, effective action<br />

techniques for treating trauma. This model maximizes the effectiveness of psychodrama while helping<br />

the clinician stabilize the client in a safe structure built on prescriptive roles for containment, restoration<br />

and observation.<br />

More about this model on<br />

http://www.therapeuticspiral.org<br />

• CAPACITAR<br />

Capacitar is a Spanish word meaning to empower, to encourage, to bring one another to life. <strong>The</strong> belief is<br />

that through nurturing, listening, and responding to the deeper wisdom of body and spirit, people can heal,<br />

empower, and transform themselves, their families, their communities, and their societies.<br />

Capacitar enables people to do this by sharing simple practices of healing, team building, and self-<br />

development working in a way that all are empowered to act out of their own source of strength and<br />

wisdom. Capacitar has programmes in 15 States in the USA and many other countries including Central<br />

and South America, Eastern and Southern Africa, Indonesia and East Timor.<br />

I did this training in 2004 and 2005. It introduced me to the philosophy and practice of Eastern healing.<br />

This healing model is embraced as the gardener, who tends to the needs of the garden by ensuring the<br />

correct amounts of water, earth, air and fire/light/energy, as opposed to the Western medical model which<br />

sees the healer as a mechanic who fixes what is broken.<br />

Capacitar consists of mind-body-spirit practices, including EFT (emotional freedom technique) Thai Chi,<br />

Head Holds, Visualisations, Acupressure for emotional healing, Breathing. And Meditation.<br />

www.capacitar.org<br />

• THE JOURNEY PROCESS<br />

Brandon Bays, the originator of <strong>The</strong> Journey, has been involved with healing practices for many years<br />

and suggests that; for those who are out of touch with their emotions, as most people are who suffer<br />

the disconnection of trauma, particularly participants who have used substances to dull their pain, fear,<br />

irritability and anger. This process is a very healing one - <strong>The</strong> Facilitator can take an individual and/or<br />

379<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

groups through the ‘Journey Process.’ <strong>The</strong> purpose is to uncover the emotions that have trapped one in a<br />

modus operandi which no longer serves ones best interests. To discover the source of ‘who one was meant<br />

to be’ before the trauma and damage was suffered. To forgive the perpetrators of that damage – who come<br />

to ones consciousness during the process. Brandon Bays pioneered this Journey process as the key to<br />

healing. In just six-and-a-half weeks her football-size uterine tumour disappeared in 1992. This process<br />

has since helped thousands all over the world to access healing and forgiveness.<br />

www.brandonbays.com<br />

• TWELVE STEP PROGRAMME<br />

This well-known method of dealing with addiction, referred to by Twerski, suggests dependence on a<br />

Greater Power as used in Alcoholics Anonymous and many other Support Groups. <strong>The</strong> benefits are well<br />

recognised and advantaged by the weekly support of an AA meeting which encourages continued sobriety.<br />

In so far as the trust aspect is concerned, the relationship between addiction and spirituality is brought to<br />

light in the Twerski’s quote above.<br />

Dawkins suggests that there can be no recovery until the subject experiences an essential change of<br />

personality. This the basic change first manifested by AA founder Bill W. – a profound transformation<br />

in his total belief system, followed by a sudden leap in consciousness. Such a major metamorphosis in<br />

attitude was first formally studied by the American psychiatrist Harry Tiebout, who treated a hopeless<br />

alcoholic who was the first woman in AA. She underwent a profound change of personality to a degree<br />

unaccountable through any known therapeutic method. In the first of a series of papers on this observation,<br />

Tiebout documented that she was transformed from an angry, self-pitying, intolerant, and egocentric<br />

creature to a kind, gentle, forgiving and loving person. This example is important because it clearly<br />

demonstrates how key this element of transformation is in the recovery from any progressive or hopeless<br />

disease. Quantum Energy Coaching goes right to the centre of this problem in putting new beliefs about<br />

the self into the Subconscious field, which can result in profound transformation.<br />

• NONVIOLENT COMMUNICATION<br />

Originated by Marshall Rosenberg, a doctor of psychology in the USA, He suggests that most of us have<br />

been educated from birth to compete, judge, demand, and diagnose – to think and communicate in terms<br />

of what is ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ with people. At best, communicating and thinking this way can create<br />

misunderstanding and frustration. And still worse, it can lead to anger, depression, and even emotional or<br />

physical violence. His academy of nonviolent communication supports a process of communication which<br />

embraces:<br />

380


1. <strong>The</strong> concrete actions we observe (without evaluation) that affect our well-being<br />

2. How we feel in relation to what we observe<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> needs, values, desires, etc. that create our feeling<br />

4. <strong>The</strong> concrete actions we request in order to enrich our lives<br />

Consciousness and compassion are at the heart of this process, otherwise it is just another way of<br />

manipulation, with smooth talk, in order to get what one wants.<br />

www.CNVC.org / e-mail: cnvc@CNVC.org<br />

• BE FREE PROGRAMME<br />

A Life Style programme which deals with the whole person in an ancient yet revolutionary way. <strong>The</strong><br />

acronym NEWSTART is used to remember the components of ensuring that nutrition, exercise, the use<br />

of water inside and out, sunshine, temperance, air, rest and trust in self and the Divine are all brought to<br />

consciousness and assistance given to change of life style where needed.<br />

This programme offers hydrotherapy, massage, exercise, the use of water and sunshine, charcoal poultices<br />

applied to the abdomen and linseed to detoxify the system internally. South African herbs including<br />

Sceletium and Graffonia are used in this revolutionary way of assisting the whole process of withdrawal<br />

without the usual awful symptoms. Instead of replacing one addiction with another, as often happens in<br />

rehabilitation. Nutrition is addressed through a complete plant based diet. Spirituality is addressed, once<br />

the forebrain is functioning normally again, and the road to self is discovered in this new paradigm. <strong>The</strong><br />

programme has demonstrated success with chronic illnesses like high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus<br />

and substance addictions.<br />

www.befree.co.za<br />

• MATRIX REIMPRINTING<br />

Matrix (We are interconnected through a universal energy field called <strong>The</strong> Field, <strong>The</strong> Divine, <strong>The</strong> Matrix).<br />

Matrix Reimprinting is grounded in popular psychotherapeutic theory about trauma. At the moment<br />

the trauma occurs, if we can’t fight or take flight, we feel isolated and realize there is no way out, we<br />

simply freeze. Our chemical responses protect us biochemically from being emotionally and physically<br />

overwhelmed, and as our consciousness freezes, part of us splits off energetically. At this point an ECHO<br />

(Energetically Consciousness Holograms) is created, which is held in the Matrix, in our personal field<br />

(subconscious). Similar events will trigger a similar response and so we suffer stress, anxiety, phobias, and<br />

so on, which affect our interactions in everyday life and eventually take their toll on our physiology and<br />

381<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

cause disease.<br />

Matrix Reimprinting can release the energy of the trauma and bring about permanent healing through<br />

changing the pictures in the field. So if you have negative life pictures that are holding you in the past, you<br />

can change them for positive ones by creating new positive pictures to replace the traumatic<br />

www.matrixreimprinting.com<br />

• TRAUMA RELEASE EXERCISES<br />

Stress/Trauma is part of everyday life in the 21 st century. <strong>The</strong> issue is that we have not found a successful<br />

way to manage it. Not until the ground-breaking work of Dr David Berceli Ph.D. who, studying animals<br />

in the wild, realized that we have inhibited the one safety valve we need to discharge stress after it<br />

happens: the tremoring mechanism.<br />

Berceli devised a simple to learn exercise designed to invoke these natural organic tremors in muscles<br />

associated with curling up when we are in danger, the flexor muscles.<br />

By tremoring we are able to release, for the first time, the toxic build-up of stored chemicals, which make<br />

us stressed and eventually ill. <strong>The</strong> stored stress/trauma in the body is released relatively quickly, over<br />

several weeks, by doing the short exercise routine. This restores the body to its natural state of balance<br />

and deep relaxation. Professions involved in witnessing or dealing with shocking or stressful situations<br />

can benefit from using this exercise as a self-maintenance practice. When combined with psychological<br />

interventions, PTSD is curable.<br />

www.traumaprevention.com<br />

• QUANTUM ENERGY COACHING<br />

I am privileged to have learned this skill from the founder of this school of coaching. Dr Melanie Salmon<br />

is a Medical doctor and Gestalt Practitioner who has trained for several years in holistic energy medicine<br />

modalities along with Lawrence, her husband. Salmon acknowledges (verbally) that she became frustrated<br />

with conventional Medical management of clients with depression and addiction challenges, she searched<br />

for a more effective methodology and put together a process based on her findings of Heart-Math Institute,<br />

Psych-K, Kinesiology and Quantum Physics.<br />

QEC is based on the Gestalt principle of Holism. This means considering everything with equal<br />

importance: the individual and the context of ‘field’ that s/he is part of.<br />

382


QEC is based on the fact that we have a natural innate ability to heal ourselves. Through our limiting<br />

beliefs, we create blockages, mentally and physically, which interfere with healing and a spontaneous joy<br />

(level 600 on the map of consciousness). If we remove the blocks, the body heals itself.<br />

Through a process of respectful enquiry, we learn which thoughts, attitudes and beliefs stand in the way<br />

of our clients’ health and happiness. <strong>The</strong> limiting beliefs are most often out of our awareness. <strong>The</strong> art of<br />

Gestalt enquiry is to bring them into awareness. We then have the option of whether or not to adopt a<br />

different set of beliefs, which we can programme into the subconscious mind, replacing the old ones. <strong>The</strong><br />

process includes a technique called ‘cardiac coherence’ which ensures a resonant frequency with the brain,<br />

an optimal state for new learning.<br />

QEC teaches how to support these powerful processes so that there may be assimilation and integration.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ultimate aim is to empower people to begin their own healing journey.<br />

<strong>The</strong> aim of QEC is to be freed up mentally and physically to enjoy our lives.<br />

www.onevisionafrica.com<br />

E-mail: admin@onevisionafrica.com<br />

Conclusion<br />

This paper is in agreement with Twerski’s strong conviction: “I know without a doubt that the source of<br />

addiction is spiritual deficiency. Irrespective of whether we are religious or atheist, all human beings<br />

are spiritual by nature and spirituality is the cornerstone of our recovery.” In a search for healing<br />

modalities for South African Ex-combatants struggling with PTSD, I link spirituality with what Quantum<br />

Physics identifies as the Matrix (Divine), the energy that connects all beings in the Universe. Our personal<br />

energy fields both conscious and subconscious interact with the Universal energy through beliefs e.g.<br />

Unconditional Love, which through QEC can be programmed into the subconscious if the person is<br />

willing and has access to the skills. Authentic new beliefs are positive, present tense and in the first person.<br />

For example, ‘I am loved unconditionally and I love unconditionally.’ For many who have been abused as<br />

children and then again through state oppression or war – trauma has displaced the personal energy field<br />

or spiritual connection with others and with the Divine (Matrix) which results in the low levels of shame,<br />

guilt and anger demonstrated on the Map of Consciousness.<br />

Imagine what the effect of Quantum Energy Coaching for young and older prisoners could be in society.<br />

We (<strong>The</strong> Lyndi Fourie Foundation) are working on facilitating QEC for the Warders of the prison where<br />

Mandela was held captive for many years, Pollsmoor Prison in the Western Cape of South Africa. Our<br />

383<br />

Session 3


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

vision is also to deal with the aftermath of the trauma of war during the apartheid freedom struggle,<br />

bringing healing from PTSD to all ex-soldiers and their families.<br />

384


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Session 4<br />

Parallel Session 2<br />

Call for Papers Session<br />

• Parallel 2-1. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong>, Narratives, Memory, and Healing<br />

• Parallel 2-2. Language, Gender, and Senses<br />

• Parallel 2-3. Diseases, Pathology, and Social Healing


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Parallel Session 2-1<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong>, Narratives, Memory, and Healing<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> and Medicine: Narratives of Illness and Suffering<br />

/ John Clammer (United Nations University)<br />

2. Understanding of the Motherland and Narrative Representation<br />

of Healing Shown in the Novels of Korean-Japanese writer Yang-<br />

Ji Lee<br />

/ Jung-Hwa Yun (Ewha Womans University)<br />

3. No One Has Ever Died of the <strong>Humanities</strong>: Healing and<br />

Transcendence in the Contemporary <strong>World</strong><br />

/ Elizabeth S. Gunn (Morgan State University)<br />

4. <strong>The</strong> Role of Memory for Healing in Gloria Naylor’s <strong>The</strong> Women of<br />

Brewster Place<br />

/ Myung-joo Kim (Chungnam National University)


<strong>The</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> and Medicine: Narratives of Illness and Suffering<br />

John Clammer<br />

United Nations University<br />

From many perspectives suffering is a paradigm of the human experience. This was certainly true for<br />

the Buddha, who saw suffering as the foundational quality of human experience (and who of course also<br />

offered a method for overcoming it), and in most medical sociology, which is predicated on the fact of<br />

suffering and could hardly exist without it. As we will see and discuss in the subsequent chapter, trauma<br />

(surely an extreme form of psychic and emotional suffering) is a common by-product of war, revolution<br />

and criminal violence. Hinted at there, but here to be considered in detail, is the relationship between<br />

development and suffering. While underdevelopment and its manifold deprivations can certainly be<br />

described as both a form of violence and of suffering (Scheper-Hughes 1993), a case can certainly also be<br />

made that so is development. <strong>The</strong> erosion of cultures, displacement of peoples, forced landlessness and<br />

urbanization, the economic and social impacts of globalization, all force upon people experiences that<br />

they have not chosen and certainly do not necessarily better their lot. Yet despite the ubiquity of suffering,<br />

it has attracted little attention from the social sciences – remarkably little and perhaps scandalously little.<br />

To speak of ‘poverty’ is to name an abstract category, an economic status, but does little to reveal the<br />

experience of deprivation that the category label conceals; to speak of ‘untouchability’ is but to name<br />

a social status in a hierarchical system of castes, but it does little to illuminate the daily humiliations of<br />

exclusion and denigration and its immense psychic effects that the status entails. Anthropology has been<br />

particularly remiss in this respect. For all its vaunted self-advertised expertise in ethnography, in practice<br />

concern for such disciplinary preoccupations as kinship, ritual, oral tradition or local level political<br />

organization, have led to a resounding silence on the question of the inequalities and everyday suffering<br />

that frequently pervade the societies that anthropologists mostly elect to study (for a notable exception see<br />

Kleinman, Das and Lock 1997).<br />

Earlier studies of, if not of suffering per se, at least of the structures of inequality that frequently give rise<br />

to them, have been largely swept under the anthropological carpet. Significantly studies of suffering in<br />

society shows that such suffering is frequently generated by the cultures of those very societies as much<br />

389<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

as by “objective” forces of war, revolution or economic restructuring. Many of these studies have come<br />

primarily from theologians, especially those associated with liberation theology (Chopp 1986, Gutierrez<br />

1983), while empirical ones have come mainly from those who have followed the endemic violence<br />

of societies such as Guatemala, El Salvador and Argentina (for a range of examples see Feitlowitz<br />

1998, Grandin 2000), postcolonial theorists and students of the violence of modernity such as Enrique<br />

Dussel (Dussel 1995) and Zygmunt Bauman in his later writings (Bauman 2004). Implicit in many of<br />

these studies, although rarely stated as such, is the question of the violence of development. Certainly<br />

colonialism, the process of modernity and their latest manifestation as globalization, are all of them<br />

complicit in containing or advancing by another name the concept and practice of “development” (Sachs<br />

1995). <strong>The</strong> links between modernity, violence (especially structural violence) and development are clear.<br />

<strong>The</strong> question then becomes how to place the suffering that they generate and/or which are generated by<br />

the existential qualities of being human, at centre place in social analysis, so that its causes can be more<br />

fully understood with a view to its alleviation, and by what methodology such suffering might be grasped<br />

and understood.<br />

Development theory has a tendency not to dialogue with other sectors of social theory, and yet in empirical<br />

development studies issues of health are one of the central concerns. Medical sociology and medical<br />

anthropology while focused on cultural constructions of illness, patterns of medical care and the cultural<br />

management of illness through ritual and other mechanisms, in fact have at their centres the problem<br />

of human suffering even if they do not explicitly identify it as such. <strong>The</strong> interesting methodological<br />

possibility then arises of linking the discourses of development sociology and the sociology of medicine<br />

by way of the analysis of the causes and management of suffering. <strong>The</strong> question then is, ‘can medical<br />

models illuminate the problem of suffering in development contexts?’ <strong>The</strong> answer is certainly a qualified<br />

yes, and what follows is an exploration of this potentially creative interface and its implications for<br />

development discourse and practice.<br />

Suffering and Development<br />

<strong>The</strong> problem of suffering has always been central to humanity and its cultures. A great deal of what<br />

passes for religion is actually a wrestling with the problem of suffering, whether expressed in the idiom of<br />

Buddhism (suffering as arising from attachment and desire), or, as in the Judeo-Christian tradition, defined<br />

primarily as the problem of evil. Although perhaps posed primarily as a theological or metaphysical<br />

question, in practice it is the cultural negotiation of suffering that actually preoccupies most actual people<br />

– cultural explanations of suffering (as with Azande witchcraft), the diminution of such suffering by way<br />

of magic, ritual, healing techniques and medicines, the identification of specialists in the relief of suffering<br />

(doctors, shamans, witchdoctors, mediums), and techniques of prevention and protection. Such an<br />

390


approach applies particularly, although not exclusively, to illness, but may in some cases also be applied<br />

to more “structural” forms of suffering such as war, natural disasters, the social, cultural and economic<br />

displacements of modernization and development (forced migration because of dam construction, loss of<br />

traditional livelihoods as a result of the expansion of agribusiness and plantation agriculture, loss of land<br />

for airport or road construction), or through the violence of colonialism and the new economic activities<br />

(slavery, mining, plantation labour) that it enforces on subject peoples (for a classic instance see Taussig<br />

1980). It is also the case that cultures themselves are a major source of suffering for their own members<br />

by way of patterns of social exclusion, torture and other methods of punishment, warfare, socially<br />

sanctioned forms of violence, neglect and educational, psychological and other performative stresses and<br />

expectations. Social theory is itself often complicit in this. Its recent preoccupation with the “Other” and<br />

with the politics of difference, extended not only to humans but to nature as well, rather than with seeking<br />

a philosophy of interrelationship and mutual dependency, has if anything intensified the tendency to see<br />

cultures as separating rather than as including, even as critical theory and postmodern deconstructionism<br />

have proved very efficient at critique, but very weak indeed at any positive form of reconstruction. <strong>The</strong><br />

interplay of structural violence and individual suffering then becomes a key interface. Exploring this<br />

interplay in the context of development then becomes our objective.<br />

Suffering, as the Buddha clearly saw, is part of the human condition, and not just a peripheral part at<br />

that for much of our species. As David Morris suggests “Unlike robots or rabbits, humans possess a<br />

tendency towards repeated and often protracted illnesses that seem finally less a flaw in our design than a<br />

mysterious signature” (Morris 1998, 1). And even as the search for perfect health is a universal and ancient<br />

impulse, so too is the search for the perfect society, as evidenced by the perennial attraction of utopias<br />

throughout history. If the perfect society cannot be found, at least we seek the good society – the best that<br />

the imperfections and limitations of human thinking and conduct can conjure. Whatever the criticisms<br />

that have been made (often quite rightly) of the concept of “development”, what can certainly be said in<br />

its favour is that it does (or should) represent the impulse towards the alleviation of unnecessary suffering<br />

and the achievement of higher and potentially reachable levels of social justice. But just as illness has<br />

been attacked by the mechanical and science based intervention of biomedical medicine (with its many<br />

victories, but with the corresponding marginalization of traditional medical systems and their accumulated<br />

wisdom), so the problems of underdevelopment have been attacked with all the resources of a “scientific”<br />

economics and all the managerial paraphernalia of policy science, planning and forecasting. Both depend<br />

on a mechanistic model and the assumption that there are objective “problems” to be “solved” by the<br />

application of scientific reasoning. Neither has taken seriously the necessary convergence between on the<br />

one hand biology and culture and on the other between culture and development. <strong>The</strong> result has been not<br />

only the very incomplete treatment of illness by biomedicine and even the generation of what Ivan Illich<br />

has called “Iatrogenesis” – medically induced diseases - the existence of which led him to the conclusion<br />

391<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

that “<strong>The</strong> medical establishment has become a major threat to health” (Illich 1990,11). Its more radical<br />

critics would say that the same thing is true of development. Both certainly operate in an environment of<br />

very incomplete knowledge, strongly political agendas often driving their allegedly scientific objectives,<br />

little awareness of the long term outcomes of their well-intentioned interventions and little insight into the<br />

deep subjectivity of the subjects of their activities – patients or those being “developed”.<br />

Yet for all their limitations, hidden often behind their hubris and lack of acknowledgement of the very<br />

failures from which as much can be learnt as from the successes, is a common concern with human<br />

suffering, whether expressed in illness or in the deprivations and exclusions of poverty. And they are in<br />

any case connected – poverty and its attendant chronic or acute malnutrition is at the basis of many if not<br />

most of the sicknesses experienced in the “Third <strong>World</strong>”. While culture shapes and provides (however<br />

imperfect) models for suffering, the afflictions that provide so much of the “signature” of being human<br />

are common to all of us. While politics is the cause of much suffering, suffering itself lies beyond politics<br />

– it is a universal language and as such the basis for a new form of philosophical anthropology – not the<br />

seeking for an “essence” of human nature, but a critique of the nature and sources of that suffering, a<br />

critique that points to such remedies as are within our power. This modesty is necessary as a clear lesson to<br />

be derived both from the limitations of biomedicine and of development: while both have very honourable<br />

intentions, both may be working with the wrong model that still controls thinking, education and practice<br />

in the respective fields: a biomedical one in the case of medicine and a still (despite disclaimers) largely<br />

economistic one in development. While both have shown remarkable successes in addressing certain<br />

(especially acute) crises, neither provide a clear model of health or of the good society. Both tend to<br />

operate with the false philosophical view that there are discrete, concrete “problems” to be “solved”<br />

rather than with a view of the embeddedness of their particular fields in the complex and indeterminate<br />

context of culture and in relation to deep change – the slow and fundamental shifts rather than the<br />

easily discernable and measurable “social trends”- in which global society is now and has always been<br />

situated. Much as we desire one, there is no “cure”, no ultimate “fix”: rather there must be a new model<br />

of understanding suffering as a key interface between the existential condition of being human – our<br />

species being to use Marx’s term – and the cultural negotiation of that suffering. While the issue certainly<br />

and ultimately touches upon theological questions, here it will be understood as a matter of sociology, but<br />

of a deep sociology that goes beyond the empiricist and mechanistic premises of so much conventional<br />

sociology (Clammer 2008).<br />

Any adequate (especially culturally adequate) conception of development must accordingly encompass<br />

the economic, political and natural conditions that define its parameters, and also the experience of those<br />

faced with the actual life-conditions of underdevelopment and the often wrenching transformations that<br />

accompany change, perhaps to a better state, or perhaps just to a different one. This, as we have seen in<br />

392


chapter four, is a somewhat different notion from the recent anthropological rediscovery of “indigenous<br />

knowledge” (e.g. Sillitoe 1998; Sillitoe, Bicker and Pottier 2002). In that approach the ethnoscience of<br />

developing societies is seen as being functionally recoverable and applicable to the development process,<br />

in particular in such areas as agriculture and healing. It says however little or nothing about the experience<br />

of development or of the destruction, transformation or re-negotiation of that traditional knowledge<br />

under the impact of development or its larger frameworks such as globalization or colonialism. Again an<br />

analogy with medicine greatly helps to clarify this. David Morris discusses the case of the critic Anatole<br />

Broyard who, prior to his death from prostate cancer in 1990 kept a diary reflecting on his own illness and<br />

his relationship to the medical system that was attempting to treat him. In that diary Broyard emphasizes<br />

the power of narratives to make sense of experience, including in his case a not statistically uncommon,<br />

but personally devastating experience. As Morris summarizes it: “He emphasizes that narrative contains<br />

or releases therapeutic powers. A sick person, he contends, can make a story out of illness as a way<br />

of trying to ‘detoxify it’. In seeking to detoxify his own illness, Broyard experiments with inventing<br />

‘mininarratives’ and exploring the resources of metaphor: ‘I saw my illness as a visit to a disturbed<br />

country… I imagined it as a love affair with a demented woman who demanded things I had never<br />

done before’” (Morris 1998, 45). Such narratives of course do not need to be written: the oral history of<br />

development and maldevelopment is undoubtedly richer than the sparse written record. What is significant<br />

about them is that they allow the “victims” of even apparently intolerable situations to find, if not meaning,<br />

certainly humour, a sense of self-worth and a meeting with reality (change, struggle, deprivation) on their<br />

own terms rather than being the victim of determinism. As Morris summarizes the case ‘<strong>The</strong> patient,’ he<br />

insists, has to start by treating his own illness not as a disaster, an occasion for depression or panic, but as<br />

a narrative, a story. Stories are anti-bodies against illness and pain. <strong>The</strong> storyteller – according to Arthur<br />

W. Frank (another cancer patient who turned his experience into narrative) – is the new figure of the<br />

postmodern patient: no longer a victim of disease, not the object of medicine, but a person struggling to<br />

recover and to reshape the voice that illness so often takes from us” (Morris 1998, 48).<br />

Narrative, Development, Empowerment<br />

Narrative, then, is a form of empowerment, available alike to the very poor and to the very rich. And<br />

its necessity may be increasing as with the advent of the “risk society” with its unknown, diffused,<br />

untraceable dangers and problems, the sense of lack of control over the environment by the average<br />

individual increases. <strong>The</strong> disempowering consequences of development as much as of medicine then need<br />

to be confronted. And again we can see the parallels between development and mechanistic biomedicine:<br />

Postmodern illness, because of its complicated links to the culturally constructed environment,<br />

ultimately demands that we rethink the sources of medical knowledge. Laboratory tests and scientific<br />

393<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

studies cannot reveal everything that doctors need to know. <strong>The</strong> social, cultural and personal<br />

dimensions of illness must be understood through other means, and one neglected but useful source<br />

is narrative. Narrative, we might say, constitutes a mode of understanding appropriate for situations<br />

too variable and too untidy for laboratory analysis. Further, storytellers thrive at the margins of<br />

power, casting a skeptical eye on contemporary culture, and their somewhat independent status<br />

permits them to offer impassioned critiques, visionary alternatives, and an outsider’s objectivity.<br />

Narrative may also require readers to confront self-consciously the ways in which their culture<br />

has taught them to think about illness, to imagine ways in which they might experience a healthier<br />

relation to the earth. <strong>The</strong> United Nations reports that fourteen million children die annually from<br />

causes related to environmental degradation. For the children, if not for ourselves, we need to hear<br />

from voices silenced or over-whelmed by the prevailing biomedical discourse of science, policy<br />

analysis, and cost containment. We need a knowledge that comes with narrative (Morris 1998, 89).<br />

As with medicine, so with development. Morris here however seems to be speaking mainly of the writer,<br />

the outsider. Here though I prefer to speak, as with the case of Anatole Broyard, of the voice of the<br />

individual: the average and actual person caught up in the process of forced change and of the personal<br />

opportunities, energies and restructuring of subjectivities that it so often entails.<br />

An obvious parallel between development and medicine is that both involve a sense of violence being<br />

done to the self – medically through illness and the sense that one’s body has been “invaded”; development<br />

through forced, unchosen and uncontrollable changes that come not primarily from the natural world<br />

(although with the human manipulation and modification of the environment, even that is becoming<br />

increasingly part of “culture”), but from “artificial”, that is to say humanly engineered interventions<br />

– dams, agribusinesses, urbanization, industrialization, new economic forms – that are the source of<br />

migration, land loss, famine, new illnesses, cultural loss. Furthermore, decades of “development” have<br />

not had an appreciable linear effect on disease eradication. Not only have “new” diseases (AIDS, SARS,<br />

Avian Flu for example) emerged, but older diseases such as malaria, asthma and rabies have made startling<br />

comebacks, in the case of malaria almost certainly as a result of climate change as well as resistance to<br />

the overuse of pesticides. Development has proved to be like one of those games in which no sooner is<br />

one peg knocked into its hole than another one pops up. In fact a general law of all policy science would<br />

seem to be that the application of any given policy will have unforeseen consequences not anticipated in<br />

the original plan and which will give rise to the need for yet further policies. Much development then,<br />

like much biomedicine, is devoted to the eradication of symptoms, not necessarily of the real underlying<br />

disease or its ultimate causal factors, which reside as much in the complex relationships between illness/<br />

development and culture as they do in the biological or socio-economic environments. “<strong>The</strong> main point<br />

is that, although life expectancy has increased, a high-tech, energy dependent, consumer lifestyle has not<br />

394


ought the developed world a period of unprecedented health. Historian Roy Porter rightly warns against<br />

the facile and long standing prejudice that equates civilization with the spread of disease (Porter 1993).<br />

<strong>The</strong> serious question is not about the health value of civilization but about what kind of civilized society<br />

we want. Along with their benefits, unfortunately, affluence, technological development, and biomedical<br />

progress in Western nations have accompanied the rise of new or intensified illnesses. By-products of<br />

development have in fact left industrial nations vulnerable to a growing list of maladies that bodes ill for<br />

future generations” (Morris 1998, 104). <strong>The</strong>re are additionally two major consequences of this pattern<br />

of development – its immense negative impact on the environment (which in turn has disease generating<br />

implications) and its unequal impact on the so-called developing or underdeveloped nations which may<br />

well be the victims of global processes (global warming being just the most obvious) of which they are in<br />

no way the authors.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are some major consequences of this: the aforementioned principle that all policies contain<br />

unexpected outcomes; the recognition of the principles of ignorance (we are doing our best, but in an<br />

environment of very incomplete and constantly evolving knowledge) and of caution (when we are not<br />

sure, as is usually the case, of the outcome of our actions/policies, proceed with great slowness and care);<br />

that there are no “solutions” but two other things: temporary fixes that will dissolve in the ever dynamic<br />

environment in which cultures exist and indeed is a major characteristic of cultures as such, and shifts of<br />

perception. This latter point is important: even as the construction of a meaningful narrative of suffering<br />

confers meaning on illness to a patient and may indeed and often does lead to healing, even paradoxically<br />

in terminal cases (Levine 1987), so too the experience of the violence of development can and does lead<br />

to the transformation of that experience through parallel means. An equally important consequence is<br />

the recognition of imperfection, of what Ian Craib has called “the importance of disappointment” (Craib<br />

1994). Even as we have learnt that perfectionist utopias all too readily lead to totalitarianism despite<br />

their imaginative possibilities and stimulation (Jacoby 2005), so too in development the grasp of the fact<br />

both that there are no final solutions and that development is in fact an art rather than a science becomes<br />

apparent (Kaplan 2002). <strong>The</strong> objective problems exist, but they can be managed, if only to an imperfect<br />

degree, both by the techniques of development and by the subjective relationships to the processes of<br />

development expressed through articulated or unarticulated narrative forms. <strong>The</strong>re are no conclusions,<br />

only temporary closures. But the process of development itself, as experienced in particular by those<br />

being “developed” requires listening as much as prescribing, even as it does in the context of biomedicine.<br />

It also requires attention to that profoundly neglected dimension of culture – the emotions. Loss, grief,<br />

excitement, powerlessness, empowerment, fear, apprehension – a whole geography of the emotions<br />

shaped by the particular culture and its specific vocabulary of feelings attend the experience of change and<br />

the reshaping of society around oneself (for example Clammer 2000). <strong>The</strong> external processes of so-called<br />

social change and the inner processes of the reshaping of subjectivities, go hand-in-hand and are in fact<br />

395<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

interpenetrating and dialectical experiences. As the old “basic needs” approach to development insisted<br />

two decades ago, it is the quality of experience that makes any development process a success, not its<br />

delivery of material goods which are only a means to enhancing that quality of life, not in themselves the<br />

goal.<br />

Medical Models and Development<br />

Development requires a critical holism – the perception of the (often hidden) linkages of things and<br />

events and the awareness that the artificially separated dimensions of development – economics, gender,<br />

sociology, environment and so forth – in fact constitute a single interactive system often obscured by<br />

ideology, bad methodology or the arbitrary nature of academic disciplinary boundaries, and a constant<br />

vision of what “development” is ultimately for: presumably the alleviation of human suffering and the<br />

establishment of the conditions for the best possible quality of life for the greatest number, that quality<br />

of life including the enhancing of sustainable relationships with the larger biosphere on which all life<br />

depends. Within that understanding of development growth is secondary to other considerations and<br />

preeminently to social justice, a term encompassing not only equitable distribution of resources and<br />

rewards, gender and age equality, political access and representation, the meeting of basic human needs<br />

including psychic and emotional ones and freedom from torture, trafficking, forced labour and similar<br />

unsought impositions, but also a sense of fairness, autonomy and creativity. While the former factors can<br />

to a large extent be measured, the latter are, while equally important, more subjective and are expressed,<br />

amongst other means, in the narratives and autobiographical accounts of life experiences that peoples of<br />

all cultures constantly generate and tell or perform.<br />

Medical sociology has begun to recognize something very similar – that illness is not just an objective<br />

condition, but also a relationship to the world that must be made sense of in some way by the patient, and<br />

also by the medical practitioner whose therapeutic interventions are likely to be much less successful if the<br />

“story” in which the patient’s experience is embedded is not acknowledged and to some extent empathized<br />

with. Anthropologists working with traditional health systems which do centrally acknowledge those<br />

stories, and modern biomedical systems which mostly do not, yet which are rapidly encroaching on and<br />

eroding the traditional modes, have clearly identified the critical role that the narrative of suffering and<br />

the supposed causes of that suffering play, both in the ontological environment of the indigenes and in the<br />

success of biomedical or alternative therapies (Samson 2004). Development theorists however have not<br />

drawn on the vocabulary of medical sociology and medical sociologists have not for the most part related<br />

their work to the development context. So clearly a potentially very valuable interface exists here waiting<br />

to be explored. Probably the only point of contact has been with the elaboration of the notion of ‘social<br />

suffering’ explored by Arthur Kleinman, Veena Das and Margaret Lock and their collaborators (Kleinman,<br />

396


Das and Lock 1997) in which a number of instances of collective suffering including the Holocaust,<br />

political widowhood in South Africa, torture, the Chinese cultural revolution, and the relationships<br />

between religions and suffering are explored. It is significant that two of the three editors of the collection<br />

are medical anthropologists and Kleinman in particular has devoted an entire book (Kleinman 1988) to<br />

the analysis of illness narratives, a study to which we will shortly return.<br />

In the introduction to their collection, Kleinman and his co-editors define social suffering as that<br />

“assemblage of human problems that have their origins and consequences in the devastating injuries<br />

that social forces can inflict on human experience” (ix) and point out that this suffering is a shared and<br />

therefore social experience and that while this can occur anywhere in practice it falls disproportunately on<br />

the poor and powerless. <strong>The</strong> issues that they list, including political violence, social breakdown, uprooting<br />

and forced migration, infectious diseases, mental health problems, have their roots in the political<br />

economy of globalization and underdevelopment and sometimes in the bureaucratic or well intentioned<br />

policies designed to alleviate the suffering that they in the end intensify. <strong>The</strong> representation and experience<br />

of suffering all too often become “professional” problems to be dealt with bureaucratically by “experts”<br />

or “agencies” and in a phrase resonant to students of development studies “Existential processes of pain,<br />

death, and mourning are metamorphosed by these historically shaped rationalities and technologies,<br />

which, again all too regularly, are inattentive to how the transformations they induce contribute to the<br />

suffering they seek to remedy” (x). Whether the result of violent or routine suppression, “social suffering<br />

ruins the collective and intersubjective connections of experience and gravely damages subjectivity” (x).<br />

<strong>The</strong> outcome of this is that a fresh methodology is required to address these issues of suffering: “<strong>The</strong><br />

authors discuss why a language of dismay, disappointment, bereavement, and alarm that sounds not at<br />

all like the usual terminology of policy and programs may offer a more valid means for describing what<br />

is at stake in human experiences of political catastrophe and social structural violence, for professionals<br />

as much as for victims/perpetrators, and may also make better sense of how the clash among globalizing<br />

discourses and localized social realities so often ends up prolonging personal and collective tragedy”<br />

(xi). This is important for the exploration of the linkages between culture and development, as not only<br />

are cultural representations of suffering involved, but experiences of suffering are often used for current<br />

political purposes, to fuel hatred for example as we have seen so graphically in the Balkans, giving rise to<br />

yet another cycle of suffering.<br />

It is also important to overcome the impoverishment of theory that stems from its failure to acknowledge<br />

suffering and the fact that much of this suffering is a societal and cultural failure and is indeed caused<br />

by certain forms of culture. It is also often the case that theory itself divorces the humanistic analysis of<br />

meanings, feelings and subjectivities from the “hard” world of social policy, yet the whole thrust of the<br />

397<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

argument here (and that of Kleinman and collaborators) is that this is an entirely unwarranted separation<br />

and is itself the cause of further suffering. Poverty lies at the base of a huge amount of social suffering<br />

and as Oscar Lewis demonstrated decades ago (without the need to commit oneself to his controversial<br />

“culture of poverty” thesis), poverty is also an experience, one demanding endless survival strategies,<br />

adaptations and daily confrontation with the starkness of an existence without safety nets or fallback<br />

positions. To confront both the structural and existential dimensions of poverty it is necessary to grasp<br />

the full dimensions of the problem and of the experience. And to do so is to render easier the expansion<br />

of the moral community, which in a globalized environment is to move a little closer to the ideal of a<br />

genuinely global or cosmopolitan sense of citizenship and solidarity (in the context of conflict situations<br />

see the deeply sensitive analysis in Lederach 2005). And since the ultimate end of both academic research<br />

and social policy should be the relief of suffering through understanding and action, a holistic grasp of<br />

its fullest dimensions is a prerequisite for its alleviation and response at the deepest human level. Integral<br />

development requires holism: the relating to one another or the synthesis of the various disparate levels<br />

at which social science and policy discourse operates. <strong>The</strong> key to this is culture: the mechanisms through<br />

which subjectivities are formed and expressed and the narratives which give shape to life experiences,<br />

including, perhaps especially, extreme ones, the ones that exist within the realm of suffering.<br />

It is for this reason that Kleinman’s attention to the interpretation of the illness experience is particularly<br />

significant (Kleinman 1988) and I will discuss his insights here with a view to relating them to the broader<br />

question of social suffering, the very problem that “development” is charged with resolving. This is<br />

important I think because it suggests a whole new model of approaching development, a truly humanistic<br />

one rooted in culture and with a convivial, equitable and sustainable culture as its final outcome. At the<br />

beginning of the book Kleinman relates how through two experiences with quite different patients of<br />

greatly differing ages, he came upon the central theme of his study – that it is possible (for the doctor,<br />

usually fixated on the disease) to hear from the patient about the actual experience of illness and that<br />

listening and witnessing can help to order that experience in ways that can have great therapeutic value<br />

(Kleinman 1988, xii). This, he realized pointed to a holistic model that connects body, self and society<br />

and that this complex set of relationships is inevitably mediated by culture even as it points to universal<br />

qualities of the human condition: “<strong>The</strong> study of the process by which meaning is created in illness<br />

brings us into the everyday reality of individuals like ourselves, who must deal with the exigent life<br />

circumstances created by suffering, disability, difficult loss, and the threat of death…Illness narratives<br />

edify us about how life problems are created, controlled, made meaningful. <strong>The</strong>y also tell us about the<br />

way cultural values and social relationships shape how we perceive and monitor our bodies, label and<br />

categorize bodily symptoms, interpret complaints in the particular context of our life situation” (Kleinman<br />

1988: xii). We can at once see the resonances of this statement with development as it is the narratives of<br />

the subjects of development that take central place and as the development practitioner is recast in the role<br />

398


of interpreter rather than as the agent of intervention in the lives of others that s/he may not and probably<br />

does not fully or even partially understand. But on the other hand, contact with development realities<br />

and the experience of real social suffering, can shock the practitioner and the planner out of their own<br />

culturally mediated and common-sense view of the world into a deeper grasp of the extent and structure<br />

of the problems that stand revealed to them – not as statistics, but experientially, as truly human life as it is<br />

lived by a scandalous majority of the world’s population.<br />

Furthermore, chronic illness, like trauma, displacement and the manifold dislocations of development,<br />

“becomes embodied in a particular life trajectory, environed in a concrete life world” (ibid., 31), to<br />

be endowed with both personal and interpersonal meanings, particularly when the ties that bind the<br />

individual (emotional and affective ones as much as purely social) are severed or damaged. Sociologists<br />

who have belatedly discovered both the body and the emotions as key elements of culture and social<br />

behavior will recognize that the affective relationship to events, personal and collective, is a vital aspect<br />

of the relationship to and management of, change. <strong>The</strong> parallels again between the medical field and<br />

development are close and for the development practitioner as for the doctor: “<strong>The</strong> role of the health<br />

professional is not so much to ferret out the innermost secrets…as it is to assist the chronically ill and<br />

those around them to come to terms with – that is, accept, master or change – those personal significances<br />

that can be shown to be operating in their lives and in their care. I take this to constitute the essence<br />

of what is now called empowering patients” (ibid. 43). Here we see a powerful corrective to the over<br />

domination of the objective, structural or technical aspects of development. <strong>The</strong> process of change,<br />

especially when that change involves displacement, cultural loss and the cutting of emotional bonds to<br />

places, kin, work, familiar nature, deeply involves the emotions and subjectivities of those effected, their<br />

self concepts and senses of personal worth and competency. <strong>The</strong>se are questions that involve the ethics of<br />

development every bit as much as the technologies of development.<br />

But to stress only the violence of development would be a mistake. Also involved and indeed stimulated<br />

by change rather than by the stasis and immobility of a traditional and conservative lifestyle, is the<br />

possibility of human transformation and of positive social and cultural changes that lead to greater<br />

empowerment and freedom. Knowledge of the forces that are creating change can dramatically increase<br />

the strategic possibilities of the relatively powerless by understanding and thus to some extent controlling<br />

the mechanisms of exploitation that abound in most societies. To borrow a phrase from Habermas,<br />

this is the point at which the life worlds of the developee/patient intersect with the social system and a<br />

negotiation of meaning and strategic possibilities begins in which as far as possible the subject seeks the<br />

possibility of the decolonization of the personal life world by the forces that have made unacceptable<br />

incursions into it whether this is done by personal resistance, political means or by cultural ones, including<br />

recourse to myth, religion, fantasy and the freedoms of the imagination (Clammer 2008b), all mechanisms<br />

399<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

against demoralization. <strong>The</strong> practical need then for the most part is not to “represent” those undergoing<br />

development, but to give them voice and to hear those voices when they speak. As a patient of Kleinman,<br />

so appositely puts it: “We have powerful techniques but no wisdom. When the techniques fail, we are left<br />

shipwrecked” (Kleinman 1988, 142).<br />

Healers and “developers” then have much in common: both are concerned with listening as well as doing,<br />

encouragers of the recounting of narratives of suffering and displacement to emerge, empowerers rather<br />

than simply technicians, and operating in a deeply and inevitably cultural context, one in which culture<br />

is not merely a added extra to the technical interventions of the developmentalist, but is the very medium<br />

in which the whole discourse is embedded and expressed. As with the chronically ill, in development<br />

there may be no “cures”, but rather in seeking a methodology for addressing often intractable and<br />

permanent conditions “<strong>The</strong> essence of that methodology is captured by the words empathetic listening,<br />

translation, and interpretation, which I take to be the craft of the clinician who treats illness, not just<br />

disease” (Kleinman 1988, 228). <strong>The</strong> necessity of ethnography, in clinical practice and in development, is<br />

thus paramount. Rather than the practice in many development agencies of having a token anthropologist<br />

to perhaps review the “cultural impact” of technical, infrastructure or economic policies that are going<br />

to be implemented anyway, the deep understanding and appreciation of culture becomes a prerequisite<br />

for any satisfactory development intervention on the one hand, and the maintaining and advancing of<br />

the integrity of the culture in question should be an absolutely central part of any development policy<br />

on the other. <strong>The</strong> necessity of discovering the models that the developee/patient are employing is vital if<br />

the developer/physician is to know what they want from the situation, a knowledge necessary to be able<br />

to help at all with the empowerment of the subjects of the development process, or what Kleinman calls<br />

the “remoralization” – the instilling or rekindling of hope – of those subject to wrenching changes that<br />

force them to redefine their own place in the world of meanings and social networks on which they have<br />

previously relied as their primary maps.<br />

Seen from this perspective, development itself becomes a meaning-centered activity in which care not<br />

control and empowerment not management are the central methodological elements (a perspective that<br />

has major implications for development education and the teaching of development studies). None of this<br />

is exclude the political and structural dimensions of development, but rather to infuse them with a spirit of<br />

cultural sensitivity and compassion that is so sadly lacking in so many mainstream development models<br />

and has rightly led to the attacks on the very concept of development itself led by Wolfgang Sachs and<br />

others. In fact such an approach to development requires not only a grasp of those political and structural<br />

factors as well as the cultural and moral ones – the latter which the very field of “development ethics”<br />

has emerged to fill (Goulet 1995) – but also of history. As the philosopher Alastair MacIntyre has wisely<br />

said “ In successfully identifying and understanding what someone else is doing we always move towards<br />

400


placing a particular episode in the context of a set of narrative histories, histories both of the individuals<br />

concerned and of the settings in which they act and suffer” (MacIntyre 1981, 197). By so often cutting<br />

itself off not only from the study of culture, but also from history, postcolonial studies and theories of<br />

modernity and postmodernity, development studies has done itself a grave disservice, one not only of<br />

intellectual concern, but even more so because of its damaging effects on practice and policy in the real<br />

world.<br />

Suffering and Methodology in Development Studies<br />

One of the main thrusts of this volume has been that the existential issues that actually engage people<br />

on an everyday basis are actually what “development” is all about, and that culture, often treated as an<br />

abstract category with little real or concrete content or as an essentialized notion of some kind of collective<br />

identity, is in fact a shorthand for the strategic means by which people attempt to manage the tensions and<br />

problems (including illness). This has some fundamental methodological implications. As Kleinman and<br />

Kleinman phrase it<br />

Humanizing the level at which interventions are organized means focusing planning and evaluation<br />

on the interpersonal space of suffering, the local, ethnographic context of action. This requires not<br />

only engagement with what is at stake for participants in those local worlds, but bringing those local<br />

participants (not merely national experts) into the process of developing and assessing programs.<br />

Such policy-making from the ground up can only succeed, however, if these local worlds are more<br />

effectively projected into national and international discourses on human problems. (This may<br />

represent the necessary complement to the globalization of local images.<br />

Perhaps it should be called the global representation of local contexts.) To do so requires a<br />

reformulation of the indexes and instruments of policy. Those analytic tools need to authorize deeper<br />

depictions of the local (including how the global – e.g., displacement, markets, technology – enters<br />

into the local). And those methodologies of policy must engage the existential side of social life.<br />

How to reframe the language of policies and programs so that large-scale social forces are made to<br />

relate to biography and local history will require interdisciplinary engagements that bring alternative<br />

perspectives from the humanities, the social sciences, and the health sciences to bear on human<br />

problems. <strong>The</strong> goal is to reconstruct the object of inquiry and the purpose of practice (Kleinman and<br />

Kleinman 1997, 18-19).<br />

That is indeed the goal. But to reach it requires a new blend of the detailed and ethnographic analysis of<br />

culture and its existential dimensions, a grasp of the structural qualities of globalization, and an awareness<br />

of the social justice aspects of social change.<br />

401<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

In illustrating this necessary triangulation the Kleinman’s analysis of the methodological characteristics of<br />

a humane approach to contemporary world problems continues as follows:<br />

Ultimately, we will have to engage the more ominous aspects of globalization, such as the<br />

commercialization of suffering, the commodification of experiences of atrocity and abuse, and the<br />

pornographic uses of degradation. Violence in the media, and its relation to violence in the streets and<br />

in homes, is already a subject that has attracted serious attention from communities and from scholars.<br />

Regarding the even more fundamental cultural question of how social experience is being transformed<br />

in untoward ways, the first issue would seem to be to develop historical, ethnographic, and narrative<br />

studies that provide a more powerful understanding of the cultural processes through which the<br />

global regime of disordered capitalism alters the connections between collective experience and<br />

subjectivity, so that moral sensibility, for example, diminishes or becomes something frighteningly<br />

different: promiscuous, gratuitous, unhinged from responsibility and action. <strong>The</strong>re is a terrible legacy<br />

here that needs to be contemplated. <strong>The</strong> transformation of epochs is as much about changes in social<br />

experiences as shifts in social structures and cultural representations; indeed, the three sites of social<br />

transformation are inseparable. Out of their triangulation, subjectivity too transmutes (Kleinman and<br />

Kleinman 1997, 19).<br />

This viewpoint relates not only to the understanding of past and present development contexts, but also<br />

to potential future ones, especially where suffering is likely to be involved and which can be anticipated:<br />

“Well-intentioned intervention after the fact is no substitute for strong action to prevent atrocities from<br />

arising…Perhaps it is time to admit that atrocity in the past does not discourage but in fact invites<br />

atrocity in the future. From the scandalous carnage of <strong>World</strong> War 1 to the innumerable murders of the<br />

Leninist and Stalinist regimes, the countless victims of the Holocaust (condensed into a single abstract<br />

figure, six million) to the bloody outrages in Bosnia and Rwanda, our age of atrocity slips into and out of<br />

consciousness with the casual appeal of a transient news item. We fail to decipher the clues that would<br />

rouse us to an alarmed vision” (Langer 1997, 54, 59).<br />

Widening the Moral Community<br />

Suffering, while individually felt in the pain of each discrete individual, is also then a social phenomenon<br />

– it has its roots all too often in the unnecessary infliction of that pain by social, cultural, economic<br />

and political mechanisms that could well be otherwise. Mourning can be for individual loss, but also<br />

for collective trauma – ethnic cleansing in the Balkans, the “disappearances” of the years of military<br />

dictatorship in Argentina, inter-communal atrocities in Rwanda, vicious civil war in Sierra Leone, the<br />

402


deep violence of colonialism in the Belgian Congo, the experience of hunger in the Ethiopian famine or<br />

the post-cyclone devastation in Burma made immeasurably worse by the incompetence and intransigence<br />

of the desperately corrupt military regime there. <strong>The</strong> recognition of this collective dimension has some<br />

fundamental moral, political and methodological implications. <strong>The</strong> key to these is the recognition that<br />

we are all complicit in one way or another – by our silences and our ignoring or turning away from these<br />

glaring problems and the obscene poverty of a vast mass of the human family, by allowing the activities<br />

of our “democratically” elected governments and their actual secrecies, corruption and quiet violations of<br />

human rights in far off places in the interests of business or “national security”, through our consumption<br />

habits which allow us to benefit, perhaps unconsciously in the objectively negative and destructive<br />

dimensions of globalization and neo-imperialism, through the ways in which the media romanticizes<br />

poverty and commodifies other people’s experience of starvation, abuse or atrocity. Methodologically we<br />

have to grasp the extent to which our “scientific” and managerial approaches to development diminish<br />

the full dimensions of the experience of suffering, and to allow back into analysis a significantly cultural<br />

(including religious) dimension. As Vera Schwartz puts it “<strong>The</strong> Jewish view of suffering insists that pain<br />

can teach us something in proportion to our willingness to question the limits of human knowledge itself.<br />

Simply put, suffering both humbles us and clarifies our minds” (Schwartz 1997, 127). Suffering is perhaps<br />

the primary challenge to human knowledge, yet an epistemology of pain hardly exists (and interestingly<br />

the sketches for such a project that do, exist mainly in the realms of literature and art, not in the analyses<br />

of the social sciences – for example Sebald 2003).<br />

<strong>The</strong> rather recently discovered field of the sociology of the body for example, has yet to fully assimilate<br />

the fact that suffering is, often quite literally, inscribed on the body - through torture, illness, malnutrition,<br />

disfigurements caused by constant hard labor – and that such disfigurement is itself a cause of social<br />

stigma, loss of confidence and withdrawal. Anthropology too is complicit here: despite the critiquing of<br />

the moral and other consequences of cultural relativism, especially from the view point of the formerly<br />

colonized “this rethinking has not yet eroded a tendency, registered in many of the social sciences but<br />

perhaps particularly in anthropology, to confuse structural violence with cultural difference. Many are<br />

the ethnographies in which poverty and inequality are conflated with ‘otherness’” (Farmer 1997, 277).<br />

<strong>The</strong> notion of culture then is very loaded. Arguments for “multiculturalism” or the rights and dignities of<br />

particular communities, “tribes” or “races”, or even, as Amartya Sen has pointed out, of religions (Sen<br />

2007), can easily become arguments for exclusion, stigmatizing or persecution, of special privileges for<br />

some and the denial of those same resources or rights to others. It is not a neutral term and is embedded<br />

in one dimension in the particular life worlds and experiences of specific communities, their historical<br />

experiences, local ecologies and social arrangements, and in another in the larger politics of an unevenly<br />

globalized world, very much including its cultural politics which contains inevitably ideas and prejudices<br />

about ethnicity, gender, religion, class and the other classical dimensions of social inequality together with<br />

403<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

the agency of actors – individuals on the one hand negotiating their identities in a shifting socio-economic<br />

environment, and states and multinational actors (including, very centrally, business) with their own<br />

agendas of power and profit on the other. <strong>The</strong> problem of suffering focuses these issues like perhaps no<br />

other, and for this reason must be located at the core of debates about globalization and about the nature (and<br />

responsibilities) of culture.<br />

So do too they raise questions about “professional” involvement in development. In much the same way<br />

that Ivan Illich has argued that the medical profession has become a major threat to health, so it might<br />

be argued that a culturally ill-informed development practice is a threat not only to health, but also to<br />

lifestyles, memories, rootedness and a strong sense of the self. Speaking of medically induced diseases<br />

Illich proposes that “My argument is that the layman and not the physician has the potential perspective<br />

and effective power to stop the current iatrogenic epidemic” (Illich 1990, 12) and to reverse the counter-<br />

productivity of so much “development” when measured against the ideals of human happiness (c.f.<br />

McKibben 2007). As he continues: “A professional and physician based health-care system that has grown<br />

beyond critical bounds is sickening for three reasons: it must produce clinical damage that outweighs its<br />

potential benefits; it cannot but enhance even as it obscures the political conditions that render society<br />

unhealthy; and it tends to mystify and to expropriate the power of the individual to heal himself and to<br />

shape his or her environment. <strong>The</strong> medical and paramedical monopoly over hygienic methodology and<br />

technology is a glaring example of the political use of scientific achievement to strengthen industrial rather<br />

that personal growth” (Illich 1990, 16). Even as the proportion of doctors, clinical tools and hospital beds<br />

has not significantly effected the emergence of disease patterns – morbidity is redefined but not reduced,<br />

so too the vast development and aid budgets at the disposal of development “experts” has not significantly<br />

reduced the incidence of poverty or produced notable progress in the achievement of the laudable UN<br />

Millenium Goals. Large systems and their staffing with “experts” in fact can and does easily produce what<br />

Illich terms “social iatrogenesis”:<br />

I will speak of ‘social iatrogenesis,’ a term designating all impairments to health that are precisely<br />

due to those socio-economic transformations which have made attractive, possible, or necessary by<br />

the institutional shape health care has taken. Social iatrogenesis designates a category of aetiology<br />

that encompasses many forms. It obtains when medical bureaucracy creates ill health by generating<br />

increasing stress, by multiplying disabling dependence, by generating new painful needs, by<br />

lowering the levels of tolerance for discomfort or pain, by reducing the leeway that people are<br />

wont to concede to an individual when he suffers, and by abolishing even the right to self-care.<br />

Social iatrogenesis is at work when health care is turned into a standardized item, a staple; when<br />

all suffering is ‘hospitalized’ and when homes become inhospitable to birth, sickness and death;<br />

when the language in which people could experience their bodies is turned into a bureaucratic<br />

404


gobbledegook; or when suffering, mourning, and healing outside the patient role are labelled a<br />

form of deviance (Illich1990, 49).<br />

As with medicine, so also with development that is not rooted in culture and genuine human needs.<br />

As Illich rightly notes, many of the factors that influence human life and satisfaction are beyond the<br />

intervention of experts anyway. Supplementary to his notion of social iatrogenesis, he also proposes the<br />

concept of “cultural iatrogenesis”: “It sets in when the medical enterprise saps the will of people to suffer<br />

their reality. It is a symptom of such iatrogenesis that the term ‘suffering’ has become almost useless<br />

for designating a realistic human response because it evokes superstition, sado-masochism, or the rich<br />

man’s condescension to the lot of the poor. Professionally organized medicine has come to function as<br />

a domineering moral enterprise that advertises industrial expansion as a war against all suffering. It has<br />

thereby undermined the ability of individuals to face their reality, to express their own values, and to<br />

accept inevitable and often irremediable pain and impairment, decline and death” (Illich 1990, 133) – the<br />

“importance of disappointment” mentioned above. This is not to paint a gloomy picture of human life as<br />

nasty, brutish and short: it is to indicate that the barriers against it being nice, humane and long are often<br />

generated not by factors beyond human and social control, but by the very interventions that those same<br />

humans and societies, often in the name of progress, development, growth or science, impose on each<br />

other.<br />

It is what Illich calls the “specific counter productivity” of too much or inappropriate institutional<br />

intervention that in his view brings about these effects and results not in the alleviation of poverty, but<br />

rather its modernization. “<strong>The</strong> persons most hurt by counterproductive institutionalization are usually not<br />

the poorest in monetary terms. <strong>The</strong> typical victims of the depersonalization of values are the powerless<br />

in a milieu made for the industrially enriched. Among the powerless may be people who are relatively<br />

affluent within their society or who are inmates of benevolent total institutions. Disabling dependence<br />

reduces them to modernized poverty. Policies meant to remedy the new sense of privation will not only<br />

be futile but will aggravate the damage. By promising more staples rather than protecting autonomy, they<br />

will intensify disabling dependence” (Illich 1990, 220-1). Illich, unlike Kleinman and his collaborators,<br />

specifically includes development agencies, welfare, aid, and international relief efforts amongst these<br />

counterproductive institutions. While this may be a difficult position to defend in contexts of humanitarian<br />

emergencies, in broader structural terms we see here a convergence between the arguments against over<br />

institutionalized medicine and over institutionalized top-down development. <strong>The</strong> recovery of health and<br />

the recovery of ecological sanity and just development are parallel and interlinked processes. Given that<br />

a huge amount of suffering is man-made, the tools to counter this are at hand, but they do not reside by<br />

any means exclusively in technical and managerial methods, but in culture, values, spirituality, resistance,<br />

405<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

imagination and the ability to draw on experience in order to design a more desirable, rational, attractive<br />

and ecologically supportable future. If many of our current problems are the side effects of strategies that<br />

were designed to alleviate these very problems, then it is to this dysfunctionality of our planning processes<br />

that critical attention must be directed. And of course as we have suggested, culture is implicate in this<br />

too – not only as a source of solutions, but often as the source of the pain. But if it is our civilization that<br />

has brought us to this impasse, then it is our civilization that must change. This is where the role of the<br />

cultural critic takes a central place and not a subservient role to that of the economist. If what lies after<br />

“development” is the good life, then that life must be defined in cultural terms, but in full awareness of<br />

the fact that culture is not necessarily neutral in the generation of human suffering. <strong>The</strong> goal then becomes<br />

to nurture a culture that is genuinely humane, enriching and ecological and which builds and sustains the<br />

human relationships and economic patterns that contribute to the creation of the communities in which the<br />

best flowering of the human spirit can flourish without injustice and in full realization of our position as<br />

but one species in an intricate and marvelous total biosphere.<br />

References<br />

Bauman, Zygmunt (2004) Wasted Lives: Modernity and its Outcasts. Cambridge: Polity Press.<br />

Chopp, Rebecca (1982) <strong>The</strong> Praxis of Suffering. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.<br />

Clammer, John (2000) “Received Dreams: Consumer Capitalism, Social Process and the Management of<br />

the Emotions in Contemporary Japan”. In J.S. Eades, T. Gill and Harumi Befu, eds. Globalization<br />

and Social Change in Contemporary Japan. Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press, pp. 203-223.<br />

Clammer, John (2008a) “Sociology and Beyond: Towards a Deep Sociology”. Asian Journal of Social<br />

Science, 37, 3, 332-346.<br />

Clammer, John (2008b) “Decolonizing the Mind: Schwimmer, Habermas and the Anthropology of<br />

Postcolonialism”. Anthropologica, 50, 1, 157-168.<br />

Craib, Ian (1994) <strong>The</strong> Importance of Disappointment. London and New York: Routledge.<br />

Dussel, Enrique (1995) <strong>The</strong> Invention of the Americas: Eclipsing the ‘Other’ and the Myth of Modernity.<br />

Trans. Michael D. Barber. New York: Continuum.<br />

Farmer, Paul (1997) “On Suffering and Structural Violence”. In Kleinman, Das and Lock 1997, pp. 261-<br />

283.<br />

Feitlowitz, Marguerite (1998) A Legacy of Terror: Argentina and the Legacies of Torture. New York:<br />

Oxford University Press.<br />

Goulet, Denis (1995) Development Ethics: A Guide to <strong>The</strong>ory and Practice. London: Zed Press and New<br />

York: <strong>The</strong> Apex Press.<br />

Grandin, Greg (2000) <strong>The</strong> Blood of Guatemala. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.<br />

Gutierrez, Gustavo (1983) <strong>The</strong> Power of the Poor in History. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books and London:<br />

406


SCM Press.<br />

Illich, Ivan (1990) Limits to Medicine: Medical Nemesis: <strong>The</strong> Expropriation of Health. London: Penguin<br />

Books.<br />

Jacoby, Russell (2005) Picture Imperfect: Utopian Thought for an Anti-Utopian Age. New York:<br />

Columbia University Press.<br />

Kaplan, Allan (2002) Development Practitioners and Social Process: Artists of the Invisible. London:<br />

Pluto Press.<br />

Kleinman, Arthur (1988) <strong>The</strong> Illness Narratives: Suffering, Healing and the Human Condition. New York:<br />

Basic Books.<br />

Kleinman, Arthur and Joan Kleinman (1997) “<strong>The</strong> Appeal of Experience; the Dismay of Images: Cultural<br />

Appropriation of Suffering in Our Times”. In Kleinman, Das and Lock 1997, pp. 1-23.<br />

Kleinman, Arthur, Veena Das and Margaret Lock, eds., (1997) Social Suffering. Berkeley and London:<br />

University of California Press.<br />

Langer, Lawrence (1997) “<strong>The</strong> Alarmed Vision: Social Suffering and Holocaust Atrocity”. In Kleinman,<br />

Das and Lock 1997, pp. 47-65.<br />

Lederach, John Paul (2005) <strong>The</strong> Moral Imagination: <strong>The</strong> Art and Soul of Building Peace. Oxford and<br />

New York: Oxford University Press.<br />

Levine, Stephen (1987) Healing into Life and Death. New York: Doubleday.<br />

MacIntyre, Alastair (1981) After Virtue. South Bend, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.<br />

McKibben, Bill (2007) Deep Economy: <strong>The</strong> Wealth of Communities and the Durable Future. New York:<br />

Henry Holt and Company.<br />

Morris, David B. (1998) Illness and Culture in the Postmodern Age. Berkeley and London: University of<br />

California Press.<br />

Porter, Roy (1993) “Diseases of Civilization”. In W.F. Bynum and Roy Porter, eds., Companion<br />

Encyclopedia of the History of Medicine. New York: Routledge. Vol.1: pp. 585-600.<br />

Sachs, Wolfgang, ed. (1995) <strong>The</strong> Development Dictionary. London: Zed Books.<br />

Samson, Colin (2004) “We Live This Experience: Ontological Insecurity and the Colonial Domination of<br />

the Innu People of Northern Labrador”. In John Clammer, Sylvie Poirier and Eric Schwimmer, eds.,<br />

Figured <strong>World</strong>s: Ontological Obstacles in Intercultural Relations. Toronto and London: Toronto<br />

University Press, pp. 151-188.<br />

Scheper-Hughes, Nancy (1993) Death Without Weeping: <strong>The</strong> Violence of Everyday Life in Brazil.<br />

Berkeley: University of California Press.<br />

Schwartz, Vera “<strong>The</strong> Pane of Sorrow: Public Uses of Private Grief in Modern China”. In Kleinman, Das<br />

and Lock 1997, pp. 119-148.<br />

Sebald, W.G. (2003) On the Natural History of Destruction. New York: Random House.<br />

Sen, Amartya (2007) Identity and Violence: <strong>The</strong> Illusion of Destiny. New York and London: W.W. Norton.<br />

407<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Sillitoe, Paul (1998) “<strong>The</strong> Development of Indigenous Knowledge: A New Applied Anthropology”.<br />

Current Anthropology, 32,2, pp. 223-252.<br />

Sillitoe, Paul, Alan Bicker and Johan Pottier, eds., (2002) Participating in Development: Approaches to<br />

Indigenous Knowledge. London and New York: Routledge.<br />

Taussig, Michael (1980) <strong>The</strong> Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America. Chapel Hill: University<br />

of North Carolina Press.<br />

408


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

No One Has Ever Died of the <strong>Humanities</strong>:<br />

Healing and Transcendence in the Contemporary <strong>World</strong><br />

Elizabeth S. Gunn<br />

Morgan State University<br />

This is not a conventional piece of liberal arts writing. It is academic – that is, scholarly in its seeking<br />

– finding connections among a range of texts: philosophical, historical, critical, psycholinguistic, and<br />

spiritual. 1 However it does not offer a critical or literary analysis of anything. I do not claim to have written<br />

a definitive essay on any aspect of these fields of study. Nor do I claim to have written anything definitive<br />

about the authors or about the specific texts under review here. Rather, I am hoping to trace meaningful<br />

and healing links among them. Yet this is not a prescriptive piece, but more of a contemplative, mindful<br />

reading of the place of the humanities as a healing instrument in our contemporary world. As a matter of<br />

course, I believe and will argue that specific texts written by Victor E. Frankl, Michel Foucault, and Pema<br />

Chödrön speak to the healing nature of the humanities in the present-day global context. It is through<br />

humanistic thought in its broadest and most inclusive definition that I read Man’s Search for Meaning<br />

(Frankl), Society Must Be Defended (Foucault), and Practicing Peace in Times of War (Chödrön). Before<br />

situating these texts in their contemporary humanistic context, it is critical to note that I speak from a<br />

position of western privilege.<br />

I am from the United States of America, and thus can only speak critically from this location. I wish to<br />

defer to colleagues, and indeed to entire populations, wherever and whenever appropriate and necessary.<br />

Mine is one opinion among thousands, millions. It is important to add, however, that being charged with<br />

unearned privilege, I believe one must use it toward the better. To do so, one must discover what “better”<br />

1 <strong>The</strong> word “spiritual” fell out of common usage during the year 400AD. It has seen a resurgence in the Twentieth- and<br />

Twenty-First Centuries. It is often thought of now as oppositional to the material rather than to the religious. I do not argue<br />

that spirituality and transcendence are synonyms, rather that they are colleagues – the latter is not dependent on the<br />

former for the healing that I find in the texts under study here (Kurtz, 26). Chögyam Trungpa dedicates an entire volume,<br />

Cutting Through Spiritual Materialism, to the idea that spirituality is often understood in the west as accruable. Trungpa<br />

reads language as ego driven “I” versus solid object in which we fall into the illusion of separateness.<br />

426


means to others. <strong>The</strong>n one must become an ally. I adhere to Jonathon Glover’s words in Humanity: A<br />

Moral History of the Twentieth Century: “Some atrocities are not past but present. Those of us who are<br />

lucky in living elsewhere should not be inhibited from thinking about them. Journalists risk their lives<br />

to let us know the terrible things that are being done while we live in relative security. Victims painfully<br />

narrate their experiences so that we may understand. Often they do this in the belief that, if the world<br />

hears, there will be an outcry and something will be done…. Those of us who think about these episodes<br />

[Bosnia, Rwanda] at a distance will sometimes get things wrong. And of course, understanding is not<br />

enough to stop the horrors. But the alternative, the passive response, helps them keep going” (5). In other<br />

words, my race and nationality predispose me to cultural incompetence – I teach at a Historically Black<br />

University in Baltimore, Maryland, where my gracious students are quick to remind me of this every day<br />

– and taking advantage of one’s privilege happens so subtly, that I would be remiss not to offer this in the<br />

way of an introduction. <strong>The</strong>refore, I am grateful for the opportunity to include my opinion among many<br />

voices working toward healing through the <strong>Humanities</strong> in the Twenty-First Century. I am grateful for the<br />

opportunity to speak and more importantly, to listen.<br />

If we take a broad view of the <strong>Humanities</strong> in the contemporary world, some might say we are not<br />

doing so well. In a 2010 article in the Chronicle of Higher Education, Frank Donoghue reminds us that<br />

the Academy is not synonymous with the <strong>Humanities</strong>. Whereas the Academy is thriving in the areas<br />

of corporate sponsored sciences, technology, engineering, and mathematics, the humanities are not.<br />

Donoghue’s article titled, “Can the <strong>Humanities</strong> Survive the 21 st Century?” reviews the jaw-dropping<br />

attrition rate of our field from the mid 1800’s until today: “between 1915 and 1995, the total number of<br />

faculty jobs in the humanities declined by 41 percent, while the total number of faculty jobs in the social<br />

sciences increase by 222 percent” (3). <strong>The</strong> United States passed a federal act into law in 1980 which<br />

“stipulated that federally financed research done by faculty members that results in patents belongs<br />

not to the professors but to the universities that employ them,” meaning, that universities have become<br />

investment opportunities for big business. <strong>The</strong> Bayh Dole Act also “inaugurated the era of earmarked<br />

corporate donations […]. <strong>The</strong> shift in the material base of the university leaves the humanities out in the<br />

cold” (4-5). If, as Donoghue argues, the <strong>Humanities</strong> survive the Twenty-First Century, they will do so with<br />

an exodus from the Academy into literary circles, philosophical publications, and the like. I believe this<br />

has already begun to happen, and our task is to be good stewards of our field…or fields (in the spirit of<br />

pluralism). While studying the <strong>Humanities</strong> will not necessarily make one moral 2 – nor should it – I believe<br />

2 In When Things Fall Apart: Heart Advice for Difficult Times, Pema Chödrön offers the practice of bodhisattva training<br />

which include meditation practice, tonglen, and six paramitas which are the six activities of the servants of peace. She<br />

writes, “the paramitas are also called transcendent actions because they are based on going beyond the conventional notions<br />

of virtue and nonvirtue. <strong>The</strong>y train us in stepping beyond the limitations of dualistic views altogether and develop<br />

427<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

the strength lies in leading one toward ethics and awe. This is my aim in contributing to the conversation<br />

set forth by the 2 nd Annual <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong>.<br />

No one ever died of the <strong>Humanities</strong>, so they say. However, the <strong>Humanities</strong>, as concerned with the human<br />

condition, have long tried to reveal and understand fears, desires, motivations, solitude and agony in<br />

human depths. 3 More specifically, in the Modern and Post-Modern eras, the <strong>Humanities</strong> have sought to<br />

understand what happens when nation-states decide what is good and evil, why certain bodies live and<br />

other bodies die. Societal extractions of the “other” have been a theme of study throughout the history<br />

of the <strong>Humanities</strong>, and may be studied retroactively, presently, and through futurity. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong><br />

are intrinsically relevant to understanding the human condition in all of its innumerable manifestations<br />

because, transculturally, the “other” continues to be the receptacle of violence and suffering. <strong>The</strong><br />

<strong>Humanities</strong> work to reveal and promote agency to those people, histories, and cultures that have been<br />

sublimated.<br />

Modernism has argued that “all that is solid melts into air,” though rarely has the ephemeral been<br />

associated with the practice of systematic patience engendered by narratives of loving kindness as<br />

voiced in exploratory branches of psychoanalytic texts and in western philosophical texts concerned with<br />

contemporary eastern thought. <strong>The</strong> Modern (modernism, modernity, and modernization), as a normative,<br />

western text, may be loosely defined as a process of systematic self-consciousness of its own becoming.<br />

Prevalent in theories on the Modern are basic assumptions that it is inescapable and that no system lays<br />

beyond its reach. <strong>The</strong>refore, privileged notions of modernism are tautologies, only resisted by revealing<br />

them as such. Modernist theories of resistance have challenged the monolithic tautology, though others<br />

have responded by asking if alternative modernisms are still caught up in old spaces of asking and/or<br />

declaring agency? How to move past narratives of hegemony and revolution? If paternalistic modern<br />

a flexible mind. One of the main challenges of this camp would be to avoid becoming moralistic. With people coming<br />

from all nations, there would be many conflicting opinions about what was ethical and what was unethical, about what<br />

was helpful and what was not. Very soon we’d probably need to request the most tamed and awakened people there to<br />

lead a course on flexibility and humor!” (126).<br />

3 In Sigmund Freud’s Civilization and Its Discontents, he writes, “One may…hope to be freed from a part of one’s own<br />

sufferings by influencing the instinctual impulses. This type of defense against suffering is no longer brought to bear on<br />

the sensory apparatus; it seeks to master the internal sources of our needs. <strong>The</strong> extreme form of this is brought about by<br />

killing off the instincts, as is prescribed by the worldly wisdom of the East […]. If he succeeds, then the subject has, it is<br />

true, given up all other activities as well – he has sacrificed his life; and, by another path, he has once more only achieved<br />

the happiness and quietness” (29). I quote Freud’s theory psychoanalytic theory on the inverse of the “pleasure principle,”<br />

that is the “avoidance of suffering principle,” in its close relationship to what Frankl, Foucault, and Chödrön provoke.<br />

What they provoke is a narrative on humanity. Whereas for Chödrön practicing peace in times of war starts by embracing<br />

groundlessness, for Freud it is about gaining pleasure and avoiding suffering. For Freud, suffering might be the delay of<br />

the pleasure principle, the deference of desire, or the avoidance of death.<br />

428


narratives have been the guiding thought throughout the last five hundred western years, and its solidity<br />

ephemeral, that is always turning back in on itself for reification, then how to speak beyond the text of<br />

modern subjectivity? Victor Frankl, Michele Foucault, and Pema Chödrön interact with subjectivity<br />

beyond the modern through Transcendence. Through this practice in each his or her own way, these<br />

authors engage with subjectivity not as something enraptured in a modernist struggle; rather, these<br />

authors speak to a level of intuitive knowledge that transcends time and space. It is a way to side step<br />

the beleaguered modern: through its narratives on liberation, intuition, patience, and desire, ecstasy and<br />

enlightenment.<br />

Modernity is belayed by thick, cumbersome, instructive notions of progress and war. <strong>The</strong> ability to reveal<br />

the hegemonic and dominant structures at work behind a regulatory system are at once empowering and<br />

dismantling. In Foucault’s, Society Must Be Defended, the author moves from the fatalist conscription of a<br />

subjugated people, that is of an underprivileged majority, into a revelatory space in which he finds a power<br />

outside the relational (250).<br />

Humanistic thinkers such as Victor Frankl, Michele Foucault, and Pema Chödrön, among others, interact<br />

with subjectivity beyond the modern through Transcendence. In <strong>The</strong> Will to Meaning: Foundations<br />

and Applications of Logotherapy, Frankl speaks from psychoanalytic tradition of the Symbolic though<br />

wrestled free from Freudian and Lacanian determinism. In Foucault’s, Society Must Be Defended,<br />

the author moves from the fatalist conscription of a subjugated people, which is of an underprivileged<br />

majority, into a revelatory space in which he finds a power outside the relational. Similarly, contemporary<br />

western appropriations of Buddhism as elucidated by Chödrön in Practicing Peace in the Time of War,<br />

transcend time with a narrative of loving kindness. Loving kindness, intuition, or noble knowing seeks to<br />

understand thought as language – not pre-discursive, 4 but rather that through which through suffering and<br />

4 Judith Butler’s revisions of Lvi-Strauss, Freud, and Lacan reveal that any cultural or psycho-sexual narrative of original-<br />

Judith Butler’s revisions of Lvi-Strauss, Freud, and Lacan reveal that any cultural or psycho-sexual narrative of originality<br />

and/or sexual binaries is false. Queer <strong>The</strong>ory has done much to uncover the dangerous pretenses of origins. Elizabeth<br />

Wright summarizes the Lacanian mirror stage as such: “<strong>The</strong> child looks in the mirror and is delighted by several qualities<br />

of its own image simultaneously […] it now gains a sense of wholeness, an ideal completeness, and this is all without<br />

effort. This gratifying experience of a mirror-image is a metaphorical parallel of an unbroken union between inner and<br />

outer, a perfect control that assures immediate satisfaction of desire. Lacan calls this pre-linguistic, pre-oedipal stage the<br />

realm of the ‘Imaginary.’ He takes the infant to be modeling himself on the mother […] but this model is an illusion,<br />

since the mother is assumed, like the mirror-image […] to respond to every impulse […]. First, the child imagines itself<br />

to be the desire of the mother in a sense that it is all the mother desires […]. <strong>The</strong> child wants to become all that would<br />

satisfy the mother’s lack, in psychoanalytical terms becoming the ‘phallus’ for the mother, all that would complete her<br />

desire. <strong>The</strong> mother herself has suffered deprivation, by division from her own mother, and by denial of her own father,<br />

and can thus be drawn into a collusion with the child that it will assuage the lingering pain of those separations […]. <strong>The</strong><br />

absence of a gap for the child between a concept and its application is a proof of the concept’s inadequacy; the ego-concept<br />

has never been tested in use. <strong>The</strong> gap appears with the initiation of the child into the order of language, what Lacan<br />

429<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

meaning may be calmly examined. Through this practice in each his or her own way, these authors engage<br />

with subjectivity – and the other – at the level of intuitive knowledge that transcends time and space.<br />

Thinkers have been talking about healing for millennia. It might seem a bit more critical now in the epoch<br />

of the aforementioned “stem” fields. What role do the <strong>Humanities</strong> play? Perhaps we are the only ones who<br />

can say no one has ever died of what we do. In fact, the <strong>Humanities</strong> often offer a way to transcend through<br />

liberation, intuition, patience, and desire, awe, ecstasy, wonderment, and enlightenment.<br />

Table 1: From Whence Transcendence May Come 5<br />

Michel Foucault Victor Frankl Pema Chödron<br />

Defend Society From:<br />

Colonization and Effacement<br />

Society Finds Logos or Spirit<br />

Meaning In:<br />

Art, Choice, Change, and<br />

Transcendence<br />

430<br />

Society Transcends Through:<br />

Finding the Invisible<br />

Awareness<br />

Pausing<br />

Staying with Groundlessness<br />

I will begin with psychoanalytic literary analysis’ contribution on desire as that, which is transformative<br />

and transcendent, that which touches the ecstatic. In <strong>The</strong> Will to Meaning: Foundations and Applications<br />

of Logotherapy, Frankl speaks from a psychoanalytic tradition of the Symbolic though wrestled free from<br />

Freudian and Lacanian determinism. Frankl’s psychoanalytic theory of subjectivity centers “logos,” that<br />

is on meaning as spirit, “without any religious connotation” (18). Here transcendence is the engendered<br />

desire to find meaning in suffering. For Frankl, the modern subject is not stolen away through a death<br />

drive or a pleasure principle; rather, for Frankl, logotherapy as transcendence provides the subject a<br />

catalyst from “fear that meaning and purpose might be imposed upon ourselves” and toward the tension<br />

aroused by transcendence, spirit, or meaning-fulfillment.<br />

calls the ‘Symbolic Order.’ <strong>The</strong> structures of language are marked with societal imperatives – the Father’s rules, laws<br />

and definitions, among which are those of ‘child’ and ‘mother’” (100-1). In Gender Trouble, Butler argues that the Law<br />

does not make the divide (binaries); rather, the divide or sex/gender system makes and maintains the Law. Moreover, no<br />

pre-linguistic, pre-discursive moment exists before the Law. In other words, what is outside Lacan’s Symbolic, supposedly<br />

outside of the Law of the Father, is what also constitutes it but cannot be touched because it is outside the realm of<br />

language. Butler follows this thread by revealing how the Symbolic and the Real are conflated in psychoanalysis and this<br />

conflation maintains dominant narratives of sex, gender, sexuality, and kinship: “by instituting the Symbolic as invariably<br />

phantasmatic, the ‘invariably’ wanders into an ‘inevitably,’ generating a description of sexuality in terms that promote<br />

cultural stasis as a result” (71). In Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex, she continues to explain that the<br />

performance of any notion of origin is not something necessary performed by the individual, but a ritualized, almost invisible<br />

expectation reiterated and reiterated by hegemony.<br />

5 This is a very brief sketch of my mindful reading of these authors.


Victor Frankl wrestles with the historiography of psychology, and argues for a way beyond what could<br />

be called the social and the modern. He does so through what he calls the “noetic phenomena, or the<br />

noological dimension – in contradistinction to the biological and psychological ones” (17). Frankl terms<br />

this the spiritual condition, and he is quick to term this in the anthropological rather than the theological<br />

sense. For Frankl, logos means spirit, “without any primary religious connotations” (18). In keeping with<br />

modernism, Frankl’s theory at first is about consciousness or awareness which he extrapolates to societal<br />

systems. He is adamant about moving beyond the modern through what he terms the “capacity of self-<br />

transcendence” (18). For Fankl, the moment of transcendence rests with choice.<br />

What if we think of modernity as pathology? <strong>The</strong>n, according to Frankl, “we cannot break from the<br />

tautology of the modern as long as we confine ourselves to the psychological dimension” (28). Indeed,<br />

“pathology is ambiguous in that, in a given case, we still have to search for the logos of pathos, for the<br />

meaning of suffering” (28). For Frankl, the pleasure principle is “self defeating [in that] the more one aims<br />

at pleasure, the more his aim is missed. In other words, the very ‘pursuit of happiness’ is what thwarts it’”<br />

(33). <strong>The</strong>refore, the purpose is creativity, not pleasure. In other words, pleasure is the effect of meaning<br />

fulfillment. “Only if one’s original concern with meaning fulfillment is frustrated is one either content<br />

with power or intent on pleasure” (35). In terms of modernity, therefore, society geared toward pleasure<br />

fulfillment through acquisition of power is doomed. According to Frankl, “the collective obsessive fear<br />

that meaning and purpose might be imposed upon ourselves has resulted in an idiosyncrasy against<br />

ideals and values” (47). For Frankl, tension “is not anything to avow unconditionally. A sound amount of<br />

tension, such as that tension which is aroused by a meaning to fulfill, is inherent in being human and is<br />

indispensable for mental well-being” (48). According to Frankl, the collective consciousness brings forth<br />

the imagined community (as in Benedict Anderson’s Imagined Communities) through symbolic, through<br />

the language of responsibility. For Frankl, “freedom threatens to degenerate into mere arbitrariness unless<br />

it is lived in terms of reasonableness” (49).<br />

Frankl writes, “according to one definition, meanings and values are nothing but reaction formations<br />

and defense mechanisms. As for myself, I would not be willing to live for the sake of my reaction<br />

formations, even less to die for the sake of my defense mechanisms” (54). For Frankl, meaning, logos,<br />

“is characteristic constituent of human existence that it transcends itself, it reaches for something other<br />

than itself” (55). <strong>The</strong>refore, the modern reaches beyond the confines of argument of old and new. It resists<br />

universality for specificity in that meaning may be created systemically and resisted systemically and<br />

individually. Underlying his theory rooted in a psychoanalytic, modernist tradition, Frankl does account<br />

for the social, all the while believing in transcendence.<br />

Modernity is routinely defined in terms of the western industrial revolution, what is termed “scientific<br />

431<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

discovery and progress,” and the new middle classes associated with mass production and capitalism.<br />

It is “the cult of reason, and the ideal of freedom within the framework of an abstract humanism…the<br />

orientation toward pragmatism and the cult of action and success” (Calinescu 41). This occurs roughly<br />

from the very late 1700’s to the mid 1800’s. <strong>The</strong> other side of modernity, modernism, is often considered<br />

hostile to all that modernity encompasses. Modernism is in its most general definition an aesthetic<br />

movement or movements associated with the avant-gardes. Of course, the avant-gardes in part maintain or<br />

stem from the romantic notion of “anti-bourgeois attitudes” (42). In Western terms for example, Dadaism 6<br />

and surrealism, 7 among other artistic expressions, constitute modernism. In short, modernism is a move<br />

toward a purity of a system, namely language. 8<br />

Foucault’s lectures at the College of France center on the way in which the subject becomes a subject,<br />

or the ways in which they are subjugated by power. He holds that power relations are perhaps best<br />

understood as forces established through real war or through peace which in turn is another manifestation<br />

of war. He traces the domination of others through power by arguing that power circulates as evidenced<br />

by redistributions of power and the processes of subjugation from the Roman Empire to the 18 th century<br />

in England and France. History reflected laws which reflected the sovereign power of the king. Citing 16 th<br />

and 17 th century England and French historiographies, Foucault reads the interjection of discourses on<br />

race as the jostling of monarchical sovereignty and supposed natural rights.<br />

Thus emerges the discourse of race struggle in which one race will claim its natural, biological heritage to<br />

create discourse that moves from the desire to defend a kingdom against the common enemy to one that<br />

seeks to defend the society itself against the “other race, the subrace” (61). Empires and kingdoms give<br />

way to societies and nation states as the nobility wrestles with the monarchy to recuperate diminishing<br />

power. Foucault continues with the English history of the Normans and Saxons, the Levellers and the<br />

Diggers, to suggest that the ensuing war and struggle for right (the struggle not to be dominated) was the<br />

first to introduce a binary societal schema “with national phenomena such as language, country of origin,<br />

ancestral customs, the density of common past, the existence of archaic right, and the rediscovery of old<br />

laws” (110).<br />

6 Dadaism is traditionally defined defi ned as a sort of anti-art movement begun in Zurich in 1916. Though Dadaism by its defi defininition rejects definitions, its purpose was to create a non art, or at least an absence of meaning. Dada deliberately defies<br />

reason, and the viewer attributes meaning.<br />

7 Surrealism is traditionally associated with Andr Andr Breton’s 1924 “<strong>The</strong> Surrealist Manifesto” in which he describes the ten- tenants<br />

of surrealism as a combination of the conscious and unconscious in defiance of conventional reason. Of course, the<br />

surrealist movement is often associated with Freud in that dream imagery was brought forth onto the canvas or page.<br />

8 I take the majority of this information on modernity and modernism from Matei Calinescu’s Five Faces of Modernity:<br />

Modernism, Avant-Garde, Decadence, Kitsch, Postmodernsim. Durham: Duke UP, 1987.<br />

432


Foucault spends some time on Boulainvilliers, whose task it is to present Louis XIV’s successor with a<br />

sort of annotated version of a “general study of the situation of the economy, institutions, and customs of<br />

France” (127). <strong>The</strong> report was compiled by nobility, a group to which Boulainvilliers pertains. Thus, as<br />

the nobility struggles to regain from the king its dwindling power, the nobility is charged with creating a<br />

state of affairs; subsequently, the prince is bound to the compilation of knowledge of the nobility. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

are locked in circular power relation which, according to Foucault, eventually shifts in that someone<br />

other than the king begins to create historiography. Historical knowledge is no longer the reification of<br />

monarchical sovereignty, rather, “the subject who speaks in history is therefore displaced, but the subject<br />

of history is also displaced in the sense that the very object of the narrative is modified…the modification<br />

of the first, earlier or deeper element now allows rights, institutions, the monarchy, and even the land itself<br />

to be defined in relation to this new subject” (133-4). <strong>The</strong> new subject is “society,” that is, the “nation.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> nation begins to speak, but it is already a plurality of groups and voices. Thus, “this is no longer<br />

the glorious history of the power; it is the history of the lower depths, its wickedness, and its betrayals”<br />

(135). Power moves from that of telling the history of divine/mythological/monarchical wars to that of<br />

negotiating the institution of “rights:” “history gave us the idea that we are at war; and we wage war<br />

through history” (172). It is the history of the struggle for knowledge in that knowledge is power. It is the<br />

history of revolution. Society, that is the collective potential for enlightenment, must be defended.<br />

Similarly, contemporary western appropriations of traditional eastern thought, namely of Buddhism as<br />

elucidated by Chödrön, transcend time with a narrative of loving kindness. Loving kindness, intuition, or<br />

noble knowing may be achieved by seeking to understand thought as language – not pre-discursive, but<br />

rather that through which suffering and meaning may be calmly examined. In Taking <strong>The</strong> Leap: Freeing<br />

Ourselves from Old Habits and Fears, Chödrön centers her discourse on shenpa, the concept that tries to<br />

force the solid from that which is ephemeral. Shenpa may be broadly defined as attachment, that which<br />

we hold onto emotionally, interpersonally, socially, nationally and internationally. In other words, it is how<br />

something, anything – person, place, or thing – hooks us. This happens at every level: “Maybe we come<br />

home from work and we’re tired and we just want some peace; but at home all hell is breaking loose for<br />

one reason or another, and so we start yelling at people. What is our motivation? We want some happiness<br />

and ease and peace, but what we do is get everyone else worked up too. 9 This is a familiar scenario in our<br />

9 According to Sigmund Freud in Civilization and Its Discontents, “we are threatened with suffering from three directions:<br />

from our own body, which is doomed to decay and dissolution and which cannot even do without pain and anxiety as<br />

warning signals; from the external world, which may rage against us with overwhelming and merciless forces of destruction;<br />

and finally from our relations to other men. <strong>The</strong> suffering which comes from this last source is perhaps more painful<br />

to us than any other. We tend to regard it as a kind of gratuitous addition, although it cannot be any less fatefully inevitable<br />

than the suffering which comes from elsewhere” (26).<br />

433<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

homes, in our work places, in our communities, even when we’re just driving along and someone cuts in<br />

front of us and then what? Well, we don’t like it, so we roll down the window and scream at them. War<br />

begins when we harden our hearts, and we harden them easily – in minor ways and then in quite serious,<br />

major ways, such as hatred and prejudice – whenever we feel uncomfortable” (16 Practicing).<br />

Just as Foucault deconstructs the aggressions of the modern, and as Frankl finds meaningful knowledge<br />

through purpose, Chödrön understands monolithic discourses through their process of becoming a<br />

storyline, a normative discourse on history, war, futurity. Chödrön frames shenpa as that which enables<br />

individual or systematic labeling that “can lead to prejudice, cruelty, and violence; and in any time or place<br />

when prejudice, cruelty, or violence occur, where it’s directed be one being toward another or be groups of<br />

beings toward other groups, there’s a theme that runs through: ‘This person has a fixed identity, and they<br />

are not like me” (66).<br />

Thus a way through the modern, through steely houses of discursive languages and discursive thoughts,<br />

through histories, hegemonies and dominant narratives on power and the relational is Transcendence,<br />

that is to say a kind of ecstasy unbound by time and space. In each case, Foucault, Frankl, and Chödrön<br />

engage with subjectivity not a modern repetition; rather, the subject may find freedom through intuitive<br />

knowledge stored in benevolent contact, awareness of, and conscious contact with the divine. 10<br />

In his article “<strong>Humanities</strong> in the Twenty-First Century,” Bill Smoot asks, “Why study the <strong>Humanities</strong>?”<br />

He answers by reminding us that “they do speak to us, and they offer to our imaginations situations<br />

we have yet – and may never – experience, the better to understand when – and if – we find ourselves<br />

confronting the choices faced by Odysseus, Antigone, or Hamlet.” Or, we find ourselves confronted with<br />

10 Countless traditions growing forth from the fi rst two branches, <strong>The</strong>ravada and Mahayana, inform contemporary Western<br />

Countless traditions growing forth from the first two branches, <strong>The</strong>ravada and Mahayana, inform contemporary Western<br />

appropriations of Buddhism. Sakyong Mipham grew up in the United States while living a Tibetan Buddhist tradition.<br />

In Turning the Mind Into an Ally, he writes that “we spend our lives clinging to an imaginary identity cobbled together<br />

from different thoughts and concepts, trying to keep it happy, and that is why we suffer. This isn’t a sin, it’s an ancient<br />

habit perpetuated by our bewildered minds […]. <strong>The</strong> bewildered mind is weak because it is distracted. It’s distracted by<br />

the overriding need to maintain the comfort of ‘me.’ It is meditating on discursiveness and self-absorption that leads to<br />

suffering, because the bewildered mind can’t go beyond itself. When difficulty arises, it’s unable to cope. When the unexpected<br />

occurs, it reacts from the limited perspective of wanting to stay happy in a small place. So if we’re threatened,<br />

we strike out with anger. If somebody has something we want, we automatically feel jealous. If we see something we<br />

like, we feel desire. We might not even question these responses […]. What makes us happy and what makes us sad<br />

come down to volatile outer conditions, circumstances that are constantly changing. This adds up to bewilderment and<br />

suffering for us” (18-19). Indeed, I recently worked on an interdisciplinary project in the new field of “human terrain:”<br />

the federal government is seeking to codify human reactions in combat and conflict zones around the world. Psychologists<br />

and sociologists have studied human motivations for centuries. Perhaps a contribution from the <strong>Humanities</strong> would<br />

be to understand how to pause vis-à-vis attachment at every level of social interaction.<br />

434


a decision on how to respond to what and to whom we encounter when we go home each night.<br />

Underlying our tension is a fear of death or groundlessness: that which is elusively beyond our control.<br />

It is that over which societies are in war/societies’ war, that over which privileged bodies live, and the<br />

Other dies. In the meantime, we delay, we defer. We find the Other as intentional referent in a system of<br />

signs and symbols whose meaning always implies a decision. <strong>The</strong> tension is tantamount to understanding<br />

the <strong>Humanities</strong> and its critical role in the contemporary world. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> may be thought of as a<br />

contextualizing of decisions at every level of the human experience: the death drive; avoidance of the<br />

death drive; searching for ground; losing ground. But the <strong>Humanities</strong> must reveal the sinister dangers of<br />

binaries. If we believe in freedom as Mr. Victor E. Frankl does, then we might quote him saying: “Freedom<br />

threatens to degenerate into mere arbitrariness unless it is lived in terms of responsibleness” (49). A sound<br />

amount of mindfulness of tension, critical thought, and accountability may lead to Transcendence. At<br />

the deepest level, what is at stake is a paradox: Transcendence is the haunting sense of incompleteness<br />

that stirs the <strong>Humanities</strong>. By revealing the structures that bind societies to notions of wholeness and<br />

completeness, we are unbinding the Other, and by proxy, ourselves. After all, they say no one has ever<br />

died of the <strong>Humanities</strong>. If they slip away, who’s to say we won’t?<br />

435<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

References<br />

Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism.<br />

Verson: New York, 2006.<br />

Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge, 1999.<br />

__________. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” New York, Routledge, 1993.<br />

Calinescu, Matei. Five Faces of Modernity: Modernism, Avant-Garde, Decadence, Kitsch,<br />

Postmodernsim. Durham: Duke UP, 1987.<br />

Chödrön, Pema. Practicing Peace in Times of War. Shambhala: Boston, 2006.<br />

__________. Taking <strong>The</strong> Leap: Freeing Ourselves from Old Habits and Fears. Shambhala, Boston,<br />

2009.<br />

__________. When Things Fall Apart: Heart Advice for Difficult Times. Shambhala: Boston, 2002.<br />

Donoghue, Frank. “Can the <strong>Humanities</strong> Survive the 21 st Century?” <strong>The</strong> Chronicle of Higher Education.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Chronicle Review. September 5, 2010. 1-6.<br />

Foucault, Michel. “Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France 1975-1976.” Picador:<br />

New York, 2003.<br />

Frankl, E. Victor. <strong>The</strong> Will to Meaning: Foundations and Applications of Logotherapy. Meridian: New<br />

York, 1988.<br />

Freud, Sigmund. Civilization and Its Discontents. W.W. Norton and Company: New York, NY, 1961.<br />

Glover, Jonathan. Humanity: A Moral History of the Twentieth Century. Yale UP: New Haven, 2001.<br />

Kurtz, Ernest, and Katherine Ketchman. <strong>The</strong> Spirituality of Imperfection: Storytelling and the Search for<br />

Meaning. New York: Bantam Books, 2002.<br />

Mipham, Sakyong. Turning the Mind Into an Ally. Riverhead Books: New York, 2003.<br />

Smoot, Bill. “<strong>Humanities</strong> in the Twenty-First Century.” Edutopia. July 20, 2011. 1-2.<br />

Trungpa, Chögyam. Cutting Through Spiritual Materialism. Shambhala: Boston, 2002.<br />

Wright, Elizabeth. Psychoanalytic Criticism. A Reppraisal. New York: Routledge, 1998.<br />

436


<strong>The</strong> Role of Memory for Healing<br />

in Gloria Naylor’s <strong>The</strong> Women of Brewster Place<br />

Myung-joo Kim<br />

Chungnam National University<br />

Black women writers in the last few decades have provided mechanisms of spiritual healing through<br />

their texts. Slavery, oppression, discrimination, segregation, marginalization, poverty, and violence have<br />

inflicted psychic devastation on black people in general since they landed on their new home, and so<br />

there have been a great need for healing. Toni Morrison’s many magnanimous protagonists are often<br />

healers, and likewise Alice Walker’s Celie becomes her own healer by writing letters to God. Like her<br />

contemporaries, Gloria Naylor also creates characters who heal heart, soul, and body as well. What is<br />

special about her, is that for healing Naylor, as Marjorie Pryse notes, highlights “connection rather than<br />

separation” and “transforming silence into speech.” 1 Naylor’s characters come to the realization that they<br />

are all connected, and that sense of connectedness typically comes at the moment of telling and sharing<br />

their past stories whether they are painful or glorious as articulation is always a powerful way to heal<br />

oneself and others. 2<br />

What I am trying to argue here is how such a sense of connectedness is made possible. That sense may<br />

come like an epiphany at a certain mystic moment when all of a sudden you transcends any immediate<br />

reality, all boundaries collapsing and everything coming within a special order and unity where you<br />

are part of it. Or that sense may be achieved by breathing, the old Eastern traditional way to reach the<br />

ultimate reality. However, for Gloria Naylor, it is through memory, an absent presence, that all people find<br />

themselves interconnected and interdependent and so they finally come to be able to start over again.<br />

1 Marjorie Pryse and Hortense J. Spillers, eds. Conjuring: Black Women, Fiction, and Literary Tradition (Bloomington:<br />

Indiana UP, 1985), p. 5.<br />

2 Carol P. Christ in her Diving Deep & Surfacing stresses the importance of storytelling for women, in that articulation<br />

helps women awaken to a sense of self and the world.<br />

437<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

It is well known that both individual and collective memories affect the formulation of identity to<br />

a great extent. So we could say I am what I remember; we are what we remember. What I member<br />

constitutes my identity. Sigmund Freud has said that “it is rather the rule than the exception for the past<br />

to be preserved in mental life” 3 perhaps without any loss, which means no memory disappears but only<br />

hidden under consciousness. That statement holds true for collective memory, also. As Carl G. Jung<br />

writes, the whole human history is contained in an individual psyche as expressed in his term ‘collective<br />

unconsciousness.ʼ 4 Luce Irigaray goes even further. As a practitioner of the Eastern breathing through<br />

which the body turns into spirit, she realizes that the body as well as the psyche is a container of all<br />

human memory. We ourselves are bodily and psychically a living human history. So we are what we<br />

remember individually and collectively.<br />

That’s why both personal and political amnesia are devastating to a person and a society as well. So trying<br />

to remember the lost memory has become a trendy task now, and it is undeniable that the task is a matter<br />

of overriding importance. On an individual level, amnesia, whether unconsciously intended or externally<br />

caused by some accident, inflicts overwhelming damage on a person’s identity. Without memory, s/he is<br />

not what s/he is anymore. On the other hand, political and historical amnesia on a collective level tends to<br />

distort reality for the vantage of the privileged. To reinscribe the lost memory contributes to the correction<br />

and complement of history as a whole. In the same vein are the feminist’s attempt to empower women<br />

and restore their divinity as well by discovering a goddess tradition or myth, and the black’s attempt to<br />

find their family root or to enact the going-back-to-Africa movement. If my personal memory makes who<br />

I am, it is not so difficult to realize that the collective history and tradition which I belong to also constitute<br />

who I am. For the reason, memory has a healing power restoring back to the wholeness.<br />

Now black experiences are not particular to the black only but they are universal and ubiquitous on<br />

this planet; they epitomize more or less a general human condition. Although slavery was abolished, a<br />

similar institution remains in a form of corporational subjection, blind mammon worship, and all kinds<br />

of relational despotism. Discrimination and segregation are not just racial but also based on region,<br />

educational rank, wealth, and many others. So black healing, which has been practiced to deal with<br />

overwhelming injustice and suffering, could work for all whose everyday life is full of inordinate strain,<br />

competition, and weariness more than any other times. 5<br />

3 Sigmund Freud, Civilization and Its Discontent (New York: W.W.Norton & Company, 1961), p. 20.<br />

4 Carl G. Jung, Man and his Symbols (New York: A Windfall Book, 1964). My statement is inferred from the following<br />

statement of June: “[...] if we are to see things in their right perspective, we need to understand the past of man as well as<br />

his present. That is why an understanding of myths and symbols is of essential importance” (58).<br />

5 Byung-Chul Han diagnosed modern disease-depression and fatigue-as a symptom of inordinate competitiveness in his<br />

Mudigkeitsgesellschaft.<br />

438


Overwhelmed by the horrendous massacre of 9/11 and following wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, Judith<br />

Butler in her Precarious Life attempts to discover a way to deal with grief not by going directly to<br />

a revengeful war but by stressing that the world is intricately connected and interdependent. As a<br />

healing antidote to such a destructive violence which is dominant in today’s world, she proposes a<br />

sense of interdependency. However, she immediately confesses she does not know how to “theorize”<br />

interdependency. 6 All she can suggest for solution as a materialist and white westerner is Levinas which<br />

evokes a respect for the irreducibility and incomprehensibility of “face” as a basis of his ethics. Levinas’s<br />

ethics does not go beyond his emphasis on mutual respect, further enough to stress that individual<br />

existence is never self-sufficient but depends on others, and that an individual is not saved until all are<br />

saved. <strong>The</strong>re is no individual salvation because all individuals constitute the whole macrocosm, while<br />

an individual being remains a whole as a microcosm. It is to realize that my own salvation will not be<br />

completed until all creatures are saved. Such an idea seems unthinkable for those who cannot agree to<br />

the view that there are powers, greater than self, invisible, intangible, and so unprovable except through<br />

feeling in silence. Unless one admits the existence of such a power, there is no way to prove that all<br />

creatures are interconnected and interdependent because there is no visible lines or detectable dynamics<br />

that would connect them all.<br />

In this paper, I argue it is through memory that interdependency could be theorized. Offering memory<br />

as a mechanism of spiritual healing, Naylor succeeds to embody the fact of mutual dependency through<br />

characters’ experiences. To say briefly, memory serves an important function to enhance the feeling of<br />

interdependency which leads to spiritual healing. Memory as a healing power for Naylor is not supposed<br />

to be selective; it is to encompass all whether it is painful or glorious; for if any part is missing, we as<br />

a person is deficient. Life swirls sometimes against a rugged ravine and other times runs across a flat<br />

meadow peacefully. Whether a raging torrent or a peaceful stream, they all constitute life’s flow. Or like<br />

an ocean, memory “ebb and flow, ebb and flow, but never disappear” (192) 7 like the indomitable black<br />

girls on Brewster Place. In addition to that, Naylor’s memory as a healing power activates analogical<br />

imagination, which transcends the immediate reality and makes a connection of the concrete to the<br />

abstract, or of the individual to the collective. In memory, time and space sometimes shrink or other times<br />

stretch, and so an unexpected connection is made, by which one comes to realize that one’s existence is<br />

totally dependent on others. Moreover, memory as remembrance empowers people simply by reviving<br />

their past history, and induces an impetus to start over again by enacting hope and vision because, as<br />

6 Judith Butler, Precarious Life: <strong>The</strong> Powers of Mourning and Violence (London: Verso, 2004), p. xiii.<br />

7 All documentation of the quotes from Gloria Naylor’s <strong>The</strong> Women of Brewster Place (New York: Penquin Book, 1982)<br />

will be parenthesized from here.<br />

439<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Naylor herself points out in her interview with Tomeido Ashford, healing means “starting over again.” 8<br />

It is true that reviving old trauma is often painful; even so, healing is possible only by going back to the<br />

trauma and see it as it is. <strong>The</strong> process of remembrance also involves opening eyes unto the positive but<br />

forgotten aspect of the whole self. We are what we remember, again. To regain the forgotten part will<br />

restore the self to its whole entity.<br />

Naylor’s first novel <strong>The</strong> Women of Brewster Place is composed of seven short stories with recurrent<br />

characters and unifying themes. Over all, the seven stories deal with mainly eight women who survive<br />

personal devastation and rise again “like an ebony phoenix” (5). Among the eight, Lorraine may seem<br />

the only failure on surface, but looked closely she herself is a person who recovers “firmness” in her<br />

nature after talking with Ben although later gruesome violence is inflicted on her. Her insanity at the end<br />

of the section is only forced upon her from outside, whereas her inner integrity is retained and expressed<br />

in her constant self-defence. Also her victimization turns out to provide an outlet to explode the rage<br />

accumulated in people’s consciousness. So, the novel in general enacts a vision to triumph over suffering<br />

and pain.<br />

<strong>The</strong> novel starts with a question which is posed by Langston Hughs’s poem. “What happens to a dream<br />

deferred?” At the end of the novel, the reader finds the black girls’ dream has not dried up, nor festered; it<br />

may seem to sag at first but it finally does explode. At the end of the novel, we see the “colored daughters<br />

of Brewster, spread over the canvas of time, still wake up with their dreams misted on the edge of a yawn”<br />

(192). <strong>The</strong>y may be destroyed but not defeated. Here, Hughs’s another poem may work as an epilogue to<br />

fit into the theme.<br />

Hold onto your dreams<br />

For if dreams die<br />

Life is like a broken-winged bird<br />

That cannot fly.<br />

Hold fast to dreams<br />

For when dreams go<br />

Life is a barren field<br />

Frozen with snow.<br />

8 Tomeido R. Ashford, “Gloria Naylor on Black Spirituality: An Interview,” MELUS.<br />

440


As many critics discern, the novel is about dreams, dying dreams but never defeated dreams. It is<br />

interesting to see that the word dream implies two distinctive meanings at the same time. One of its<br />

meanings is equal to fantasy and illusion which are associated with dreams in sleep, something that<br />

departs from reality and so is not worthy being kept, while the other means hope for the future, this time<br />

something worthwhile. Considering the wish-fulfillment quality of dreams in sleep as Freud asserts,<br />

however, dreams as hope are not so different from an illusion as seen at first glance. Jung also says that<br />

most symbols and stories in individual dreams come out of collective memories. And dream as a hope is<br />

also based on memory as much as dream at night is on daytime or unconsciously accumulated memory. If<br />

the novel centers around dreams, memory is deeply involved with its central theme of dream.<br />

Now how do memories contribute to the healing process of characters in the novel? Before examining the<br />

roles of memory, we need to see what memory is or should be to function as a healing power. Ciel, who<br />

has been “a knot at the base of Mattie’s heart” (176) all along, says at the end of the novel,<br />

But I kept saying one day when I’ve gotten rid of the scars, when I’m really well and over all<br />

that’s happened so that she can be proud of me, then I’ll write and let her know [...] And I stopped<br />

believing that it ever would (177).<br />

Mattie immediately compliments her insight, crying “Thank God, you found that out” (177). Ciel is a<br />

granddaughter of Eva Turner, and gets married to Eugene, being attracted by his smell which reminds her<br />

of her Southern home town. <strong>The</strong>y have a baby, but when Eugene comes to know another baby is coming<br />

with no job, he urges her to abort the new baby, being impatient about the burden. But even after abortion,<br />

Eugene tries to leave her, and their arguments ends up with Ciel’s awakening to his “arrogance and<br />

selfishness” (100) and her decision to live on her own, and most tragically with their toddler baby Serena’s<br />

electrocution. Her death utterly bends Ciel’s soul and body, leaving her in the “ranges of a personal hell”<br />

(102). She severely suffers from the loss which cannot be even mourned. Although Mattie heals her<br />

pain, a scar never disappears but remains as a part of memory even after being healed. Although Ciel’s<br />

final realization that she can never get rid of the scar occurs in Mattie’s dream, it holds true in Naylor’s<br />

framework of ideas. No memory can be or should be eradicated. Any of its portion cannot be done away<br />

with. Just as wholeness is important to one’s identity, all-embracing memory is crucial to base a firm<br />

ground of being on which one can start over again to bloom into a rich and full life. So healing is not a<br />

matter of eradicating a certain unpleasant memory, which is impossible, but it means starting over again<br />

by accepting all as they are.<br />

Mattie’s own life history attests to the importance of keeping memory as it is. In a similar way to Ciel’s,<br />

Mattie was once attracted by Butch who detests getting into a rut, living a life like eating sugarcane. He is<br />

441<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

clever enough to spit out the wedge before it gets strawy; he takes only the sweetest part. So he is unable<br />

to take responsibility and go steady with anybody. In a way, Mattie looks to be influenced by him for a<br />

while. “When her mind would reach out behind, she forced herself to think only of the back road to the<br />

house, the feel of summer, the taste of sugarcane, and the smell of wild herbs” (25). She forces herself to<br />

forget the bitter part of her memory, being selective recalling the past just like Butch.<br />

Her partiality to the sweet portion of memory entails another form of partiality, this time, in her love<br />

for Basil, her son. When she mistakenly moves out to save her son from rats’ bite, blundering through<br />

the town with no plan or direction, she comes across Eva Turner, who advises that “you can’t keep him<br />

runnin’ away from things that hurt him. Sometimes you just gotta stay there and teach him how to go<br />

through bad and good of whatever comes” (31). Mattie does not listen nor understand its meaning until<br />

she completely loses her son who has grown up to be a feeble-minded irresponsible young fugitive. It<br />

costs her a lot to learn the lesson that one can start over again only when accepting the whole, not partial<br />

truth. Truth sets us free. All inclusive memory attests to the fact that the good depends on the bad and vice<br />

versa. <strong>The</strong> sweet and the bitter come together to form a sugarcane; to make a whole, two contraries are<br />

interdependent.<br />

In addition to the memory’s healing capacity as a container of total truth, its transcending power over<br />

time and space makes analogical imagination possible by broadening the vision and making unexpected<br />

connection among dissimilar things. In memory, the past and the present coexist. Any linear chronological<br />

arraignment or duration is not meaningful in memory. As Naylor describes,<br />

Time’s passage through the memory is like molten glass that can be opaque or crystallize at any<br />

given moment at will: a thousand days are melted into one conversation, one glance, one hurt, and<br />

one hurt can be shattered and sprinkle over a thousand days. It is silent and elusive, refusing to be<br />

damned and dripped out day by day; it swirls through the mind while an entire lifetime can ride<br />

like foam on the deceptive, transparent waves and get sprayed onto the consciousness at ragged,<br />

unexpected intervals (35).<br />

However, it is not just time in memory that shrinks and stretches at will. Space also leaps over boundaries<br />

in memory. Such a transcending function of memory helps making connection. Ben shares his painful<br />

memory with Lorraine after she is denied by her neighbor and even by her lover <strong>The</strong>resa. Sharing their<br />

memories, Ben identifies Lorraine with his daughter whom he was not able to protect from sexual<br />

exploitation; her friendship with Ben strengthens her and gives “firmness” enough to assert herself. She<br />

is ready to start over again although her healing is only momentary. Another identification over time and<br />

space is made between Lorrain and Ciel. It is in Ciel’s dream that she becomes a person, Lorrain, who<br />

442


was victimized by the town gangsters. Ciel says, “And there was a woman who was supposed to be me, I<br />

guess. She didn’t exactly like me, but inside I felt it was me” (179). Lorrain is identified with Ciel in terms<br />

of severe suffering and pain that they go through.<br />

More importantly, all of Brewster women identify themselves with Lorrain by madly yanking each<br />

stained brick out of the wall, feeling the blood stain is their own blood. In Mattie’s wish-fulfilling dream,<br />

all women project their pain into the wall which has been forgotten as a mere fixture of the town. Now<br />

awakened to their own pain through Lorrain’s victimization, they explode, attempting to break down the<br />

wall. <strong>The</strong> wall is the central symbol of the novel, representing the communal memory of discrimination,<br />

abandonment, isolation, segregation, and dispair. <strong>The</strong>ir gesture to tear down the wall is an act of recalling<br />

their forgotten bitter memory and rebelling against what it represents. <strong>The</strong>y all become one by identifying<br />

themselves with the communal memory. Toward the end of the novel, we see a sunny day after a week of<br />

rain, and the novel ends with Etta’s hopeful cry, “We’re gonna a party” (189). A new day is dawning, and<br />

people are ready to start over again. That’s healing. Here, memory is a matrix from which a new life is<br />

born.<br />

It is always amazing to see the old throbbing pain is often recalled with detached aloofness, although some<br />

pain newly starts to throb again when recalled, but of course, with less intensity. It is because once pain<br />

is incorporated into memorial space it is put into perspective. One finally acquires a proper perspective to<br />

enable us to make an unexpected connection among separated events and people and find meanings for<br />

all. So remembrance itself involves a healing process. <strong>The</strong>re is something we would never see until we<br />

stop and see. That stop is a moment of remembrance, looking back. Mattie regrets her son has not been<br />

able to heal himself unlike Ciel. She says to Ciel, “Guess he ain’t been as lucky as you yet. Ain’t run out<br />

of highway to stop and make him think” (178). Mattie makes the point that what makes Ciel successful in<br />

self-healing is she has been able to transcend life’s flow and see it from a proper perspective by stopping<br />

and looking back.<br />

Likewise, Kiswana’s conflict with her mother is resolved when they together look back their immediate<br />

family history. Mrs. Browne responds to her daughter’s angry accusation calling her “a white man’s<br />

nigger who’s ashamed of being black” (85).<br />

I am alive because of the blood of proud people who never scraped or begged or apologized for<br />

what they were. <strong>The</strong>y lived asking only one thing of this world -to be allowed to be. And I learned<br />

through the blood of these people that black isn’t beautiful and it isn’t ugly black is! It’s not kinky<br />

hair and it’s not straight hair- it just is (86).<br />

443<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

She continues to talk about her own brave grandmother who “held off six white men with a shotgun when<br />

they tried to drag one of her sons to jail for ‘not knowing his place’” (86), and ends her moving speech<br />

with “that’s not being white or red or black that’s being a mother” (86). She reminds Kiswana of another<br />

tradition of being itself which has been handed down from mothers to mothers, besides her political<br />

activism of keeping the African tradition. <strong>The</strong> communal memory of mothers’ sacrifice for survival brings<br />

about their reconciliation. <strong>The</strong> remembrance heals a rip in the relationship between the mother and her<br />

daughter.<br />

Etta Mae Johnson goes through a similar healing process. Her constant affairs with men is closely related<br />

to her wish of acquiring a material and spiritual security for which she has fought against the hostile world<br />

like a “greased cobra” (56) and “a bantam” (59). After all frustration, her final false expectation about a<br />

deceptive preacher is destined to be crushed. At dawn after a night with the preacher, she looks at the wall<br />

for the first time since she came to Brewster. By looking at the wall, she shares the communal memory<br />

of “broken spirit” (72) with others, and turns into a member of the community from an outsider who has<br />

been reluctant to belong. And then she recalls Mattie who constitutes a main part of her memory. In spite<br />

of her cruel words and behaviors toward Mattie, Etta knows she would find healing love and comfort in<br />

Mattie thanks to the years that they have shared together.<br />

Cora Lee also finds an impetus to move on with hope when she recalls her old school days when she<br />

loved learning, especially Shakespeare. Her cultural memory, which has been forgotten among the debris<br />

of every day juggling, awakens her to the reality that babies would grow up to be adults. <strong>The</strong>n she begins<br />

to dream, this time, a real dream for the future; her “dumb-ass” children could be responsible and reliant<br />

contributors to the society.<br />

Besides, food and house are the agencies through which memory is retained and, when recalled, proves<br />

spiritual healing. Eva’s food and house are symbolic of healing when they are kept in memory.<br />

This novel provides a three-layered healing process. As pointed out, storytelling itself offers healing,<br />

giving an articulation to chaotic experiences. On the writer’s side, storytelling plays a therapeutic role,<br />

putting her individual and collective memories into proper perspective. Also, the novel itself is about<br />

healing by presenting suffering characters who start over again through memory. Third, healing occurs<br />

on the side of the reader while reading, who identifies and sympathize with the characters. <strong>The</strong> reading<br />

process requires long duration during which the reader’s individual and collective memory is in turn<br />

evoked and infiltrated into fictional experiences. So both writing and reading involves healing, and<br />

memory plays an important role in healing by its inclusive, connecting, and remembering function.<br />

444


References<br />

Ashford, Tomeiko R. “Gloria Naylor on Black Spirituality: An Interview,” MELUS 30, no.4 (2005):<br />

73-87.<br />

Butler, Judith. Precarious Life: <strong>The</strong> Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso, 2004.<br />

Christ Carol P. Diving Deep & Surfacing: Women Writers on Spiritual Quest. Boston: Beacon Press, 1980.<br />

Freud, Sigmund. Civilization and Its Discontent. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1961.<br />

Han, Byung-Chul. Mudigkeitsgesellschaft. Translated by Tae-Whan Kim. Seoul: Munhak & Jisung Co,<br />

2012.<br />

Irigaray, Luce. Between East and West: from Singularity to Community. Translated by Stephen Pluhacek.<br />

New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.<br />

Jung, Carl G. Man and his Symbols. New York: A Windfall Book, 1964.<br />

Morrison, Toni. Beloved. New York: Plume, 1987.<br />

Naylor, Gloria. <strong>The</strong> Women of Brewster Place. New York: Penguin Book, 1982.<br />

Pryse, Marjorie and Hortense J. Spiller, eds. Conjuring: Black Women, Fiction, and Literary Tradition.<br />

Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1985.<br />

Walker, Alice. <strong>The</strong> Color Purple. New York: Pocket Books, 1982.<br />

445<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Parallel Session 2-2<br />

Language, Gender, and Senses<br />

1. Healing Thought: <strong>The</strong>rapeutic Philosophy and the Critique of<br />

Metaphysics<br />

/ Anthony Curtis Adler (Yonsei University)<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> Practicing of Feminism as Healing <strong>Humanities</strong><br />

/ Ra-Keum Huh (Ewha Womans University)<br />

3. Emotions and <strong>Humanities</strong> Healing: <strong>The</strong> Greek Philosophers and<br />

the Stoics’ Understanding of Emotions<br />

/ Wooryong Park (Sogang University)<br />

4. <strong>The</strong> Healing Function of Talchum<br />

/ Hyun Shik Ju (Sogang University)


Healing Thought: <strong>The</strong>rapeutic Philosophy and the Critique of<br />

Metaphysics<br />

Anthony Curtis Adler<br />

Yonsei University<br />

In Book Gamma of his Metaphysics, Aristotle declares that there is a science that studies “Being as<br />

Being and those things belonging to Being with respect to [what it is in] itself (to on hē to on kai ta toutō<br />

huparchonta kath’ hauto)” (1003a). This science, he continues, is different from all the other particular<br />

sciences, since it alone theorizes Being “universally” (literally: with respect to the whole) as “Being.” All<br />

the other sciences, in contrast, carve off some smaller portion from the whole, and concentrate on this.<br />

Aristotle wrote the texts of Metaphysics in the 4th century B.C., though they were not compiled under<br />

that name until the first century C.E. Almost two and a half millennium have since past, yet Aristotle’s<br />

conception of a science of “ontology,” the theorization of Being as Being, remains a matter of great<br />

controversy. It is a provocation, a stimulus to philosophy that cannot be easily dismissed. Indeed, it has<br />

become “controversial” as never before. One could even say that, in the twentieth century, the possibility<br />

of a “science of Being” has become one of the main questions both uniting and dividing the two schools<br />

of philosophy that have become known, respectively, as “continental” and “analytic philosophy.” Both<br />

“continental” and “analytic” philosophers would call into question the pretensions of “Metaphysics” to<br />

theorize the ultimate nature of reality, challenging the philosophical terminology and conceptualities that<br />

had come into being through the reception of Aristotle’s thought, culminating in the late middle ages, but<br />

that continued to hold sway over the discourse of philosophers even as they struggled, in the early modern<br />

and beyond, to free themselves from the heavy yoke of scholasticism.<br />

Yet they would conceive of this project of liberation in very different ways. “Analytic” philosophers<br />

were, from the first, concerned with developing an account of logic, language, propositional truth that<br />

could accommodate the new discoveries in mathematics and the natural sciences. <strong>The</strong>y approached the<br />

problems of philosophy with the ingenuity and brilliance of engineers --- inspired by the possibilities<br />

of the future, compelled by the exigencies of the present, and largely unburdened by the claims of the<br />

449<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

past. For an engineer, the past is the history of failures and successes; one can learn much from it, but it<br />

has no prescriptive force. Even when they extended their interests in other directions, or even abandon<br />

this project altogether, they remain engineers at heart. Whatever the other differences and similarities<br />

between them, “continental” philosophers differ from “analytic” philosophers in one absolute sense: there<br />

is something that keeps them from thinking like engineers; from thinking that thinking itself can be a form<br />

of engineering, or at least not just a form of engineering.<br />

What is this? A certain weight of the past, of tradition --- but also the weight of the future. To begin<br />

engineering a solution to a problem, one must feel confident that the problem that one faces is the real<br />

problem, the problem that matters. Real engineers, one imagines, are never troubled by doubts in this<br />

regard: the problem has been given to them, and it is not their place to question it. <strong>The</strong> most extraordinarily<br />

difficult problems in engineering are difficult because the problem itself is clear; it is the solution that is<br />

unknown. <strong>The</strong> “continental” philosopher, in contrast, never has the confidence that he really knows what<br />

the problem is. He believes that problems (such as the question of Being) have been handed down to him,<br />

but that the meaningfulness of these questions – their ability to speak to us now – is anything but self-<br />

evident. He recognizes that he understands these questions from a perspective that has been formed by<br />

the answers that have already been given to him, and that, in order to recover a sense for the question, it<br />

is necessary to return to the past, to understand the question from out of the past, and work towards the<br />

possibility of a future discourse in which a new approach to the question might be possible.<br />

<strong>The</strong> difference between “analytic” and “continental” philosophy, in this way, comes down to<br />

fundamentally different claims about the nature of the “specious problems” that have haunted philosophers<br />

in the past. For the “analytic” philosopher, these Scheinprobleme (“seeming, false problems”) are mere<br />

consequences of the historical failure to formulate the problem in the right way. For the “continental”<br />

philosopher, these problems, and the solutions that have been given to them, are symptoms of deeper,<br />

hidden, more radical problems, and in this way they have an evidentiary value that must be taken very<br />

seriously. If Immanuel Kant remains such an important figure for both traditions, it is because his critical<br />

philosophy allows both these interpretations. While he proposes a “Copernican revolution of philosophy,”<br />

arguing that if the questions of philosophy is formulated in the right way – if we understand that they<br />

concern appearance for the subject rather than absolute reality – , then we can dismiss the traditional<br />

questions of Metaphysics and their dogmatic solutions, he also recognizes that these metaphysical errors<br />

are symptomatic of a contradiction that inhabits human reason and that explains its “peculiar fate.”<br />

Human reason is both finite and infinite, and hence tends of necessity to overstep the limits that it imposes<br />

on itself.<br />

<strong>The</strong> example of Kant is instructive. It suggests that, done well, “continental” and “analytic” philosophy<br />

450


will again approach one another; and that they have perhaps always approached each other, converging in<br />

their insights despite radically different approaches. But it is still worth asking: why is it that philosophy<br />

took such different turns, and that, even now, these approaches seem so far apart. I would propose,<br />

tentatively, that it has something to do with the emergence of engineering as an academic “master<br />

paradigm” – a genuine and legitimate rival to philosophical theorizing as traditionally conceived. This is<br />

no where so clear than in pure mathematics. Euclidean geometry has always been intimately bound up<br />

with the fate of philosophy. Plato conceived of geometry as a preparation for philosophy, and Kant took<br />

his departure from the “truth” of geometry. Euclidean geometry, traditionally conceived, exemplifies a<br />

theoretical model of truth and knowledge (of epistēmē): starting out from a set of axioms that present<br />

themselves as self-evident, and following generally valid principles of reasoning, we deduce theorems,<br />

such as Pythagoras’s law. For the Greeks, geometry was the principle form of mathematical reasoning,<br />

and what we now think of as algebra remained dependent on geometry. But eventually, algebra would<br />

emerge as an independent discipline (this is often ascribed to Al-Khwarizmi), and, during the early modern<br />

era, with Descartes’ “analytic geometry” and Leibniz and Newton’s calculus, algebraic symbolization<br />

would gain ever greater independence from geometry. <strong>The</strong> result was that ultimately mathematics, which<br />

had once rested comfortably on a naive and intuitive geometric foundation (despite the conundrums, such<br />

as the problematic status of Euclid’s fifth axiom – the parallel axiom), would now seem to be perched on<br />

a void. <strong>The</strong> number systems that mathematicians, in their manipulation of abstract symbols, depended<br />

on, such as the real number system (the continuum), began to seem extraordinarily strange, paradoxical,<br />

and fundamentally mysterious when removed from their intuitive geometric basis. It is at this point that<br />

pure foundational mathematics became engineering: one had a clear “problem” – one knew what one<br />

needed. <strong>The</strong> challenge, clearly recognized by Dedekind and taken over by Frege, the “father” of Analytic<br />

philosophy, and then Bertrand Russel, was to “construct” the numbers that working mathematicians need<br />

from elementary structures, and perhaps even on the foundation of logic. It is a testament to the depth<br />

of the connection between engineering and philosophy that would emerge, suggesting a paradigm shift<br />

that is far more radical than those which have been recognized by historians of philosophy, that what<br />

is perhaps the single greatest achievement of human engineering in the history of mankind, the digital<br />

computer, is a more or less direct result of these mathematical and philosophical investigations. With the<br />

digital computer, thinking itself becomes a problem of engineering.<br />

If we understand in this way the difference of “analytic” and “continental” philosophy, it is not hard to see<br />

why Aristotle’s call to metaphysics as a science of Being would have such vastly different significance for<br />

philosophers whose insights were often quite convergent and who were equally “opposed” to metaphysics<br />

as traditionally conceived. We must, first of all, avoid drawing the false conclusion from what I have<br />

said. Even though the founding fathers of “analytic philosopher” were far more intimately involved in the<br />

project of the foundations of mathematics than continental philosophers of equivalent stature, it would<br />

451<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

be a terrible mistake to think that the latter, being as it were “wooly headed” quasi-poetic creatures,<br />

either have nothing to do with mathematics, or merely appropriate it, as Allan Sokal would have it, to<br />

perverse “post-modern” ends. Edmund Husserl, the father” of phenomenology, was a mathematician by<br />

training, and came to philosophy by way of mathematics. His student Heidegger had considered writing<br />

a dissertation on the “Being of Number.” Jacques Derrida’s early introduction and translation of Husserl’s<br />

treatise on the origin of geometry played a crucial role in the development of deconstruction. <strong>The</strong> question<br />

of mathematics loomed large from the beginning, and “continental” philosophers were not blind to the<br />

power of the new mathematical accounts of number. When recently, Alain Badiou, author of a lucid and<br />

rigorous if accessible account of John Conway’s theory of “surreal numbers,” claims that “mathematics is<br />

ontology,” he is not taking a radically new turn, but rather returning to this primal scene of the “parting of<br />

the ways.” 1<br />

<strong>The</strong> difference, rather, is that for the “analytic” philosopher the question: “what is number?” is, or can be,<br />

clear. <strong>The</strong> difficulty is answering this question --- but the challenge of answering (undertaken by Frege<br />

in an extraordinary text) demands clarity in the question, even if, making the question clear requires<br />

rethinking the very nature of meaning and truth. 2 For the “continental” philosopher, the question,<br />

however clear it might seem, and however pressing the answer might be for upholding the possibility<br />

of mathematical and scientific knowledge, opens onto another question. What is number? – what does<br />

it mean for a number to be? What is Being, such that numbers can be? <strong>The</strong> “continental” philosopher<br />

becomes awake to the possibility, and indeed becomes disturbed by the possibility, that the questions that<br />

present themselves with such lucidity (at least a potential lucidity) that we could “engineer” an answer are<br />

themselves not false, not wrong, but in a sense still at the surface of thinking. He wonders if “engineering<br />

philosophy” only becomes possible because, as a result of the success of metaphysics and the “answers” it<br />

has given – answers that continue to structure how we think – , philosophy has lost a sense for its deeper<br />

and more radical questions, and perhaps above all for the question of Being. For “Analytic philosophy,”<br />

Aristotle’s definition of ontology and of the questions proper to it seems to be a relic of the past. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

questions are ill-conceived, and can be discarded, since they contribute nothing to answering the questions<br />

that we face. For the “continental” philosopher, the question of Being – as Heidegger will put: the question<br />

of the sense of Being – calls us to “deconstruct” the history of metaphysics, and its solutions, so as to<br />

become again capable of understanding the sense of this question.<br />

At this point, you, in the audience, might be wondering: what on earth is he – am I – speaking about.<br />

1 This claim is developed at length in his Being and Event, tr. Oliver Feltham (London: Continuum, 2005).<br />

2 Gottlieb Frege, <strong>The</strong> Foundations of Arithmatic: A Logico-Mathematical Inquiry into the Concept of Number (Evanston:<br />

Northwestern University Press, 1980).<br />

452


What does any of this have to do with “healing”? I have, granted, taken a circuitous path; and I have done<br />

so deliberately, even though, granted, writing, for me (and this is also why I cannot be an “analytical<br />

philosopher”) is never quite as deliberate, never quite as much like engineering, as the engineer in me –<br />

whose voice and desire is still quite strong despite my affinity to the “continental” tradition – would like.<br />

But I had a clear sense of where I wished to end up, even if the path to that destination was itself, at times,<br />

a revelation.<br />

What I have hoped to show, above all, is that analytic and continental philosophy are both, for want of<br />

a better word, good ways of thinking: different, but good. Done well, they work together, from their<br />

distance, to uphold the dignity of questioning and answering, which is always threatened by the double<br />

danger: “questions without real answers” and “answers without real questions.” <strong>The</strong>se dangers are clear<br />

enough when either is done poorly: either one becomes lost in a self-satisfied obscurity that refuses<br />

the clarity of the concept, or discourse degenerates into the petty debating of “positions.” But there is<br />

also another danger, which is more insidious the more that it presents itself as a solution. <strong>The</strong> danger of<br />

premature reconciliation: a reconciliation that is forced, that is sought after through the artificial means<br />

of a metadiscourse that seeks to attain something that, as Hegel well recognized, can only happen with<br />

the fullness of time; and perhaps only when both of the opposed sides become irrelevant in the wake<br />

of something else. <strong>The</strong> name for this and for every such reconciliation is healing – and the concept of<br />

“healing,” as I will suggest, governs over this reconciliation in triple sense. It names the goal (“a healthy<br />

philosophical discourse” – one which is not so bitterly divided); the “means” (a discourse of “healing,” of<br />

reconciliation, by more broad-minded philosophers); but, most importantly, it names the hidden source of<br />

unity between “continental” and “analytic” philosophy that will allow them to be reconciled, since they<br />

are already, deep in their hearts, reconciled. Bringing these together, we could put it this way: “a healing<br />

discourse will heal philosophy of its painful division by demonstrating that both analytic and continental<br />

philosophy have to do with healing.” <strong>The</strong> scapegoat, in this wondrous medicinal ritual, is metaphysics:<br />

they are both “healing” thinking from the “unhealthy” effects of metaphysics. If healing is able to have<br />

this amazing curative power over philosopher, it is because it interacts in a most intriguing way with the<br />

“difference” between “analytic” and “continental” philosophy which I have mentioned. Healing, and<br />

medicine more generally, presents the correlate of engineering: a non-philosophical discourse and practice<br />

that came to serve as a master discourse for philosophy, in so far as it articulated the point at which a “parting<br />

of ways,” at once constitutive of philosophy and disruptive of philosophy, could take place. <strong>The</strong> Classical<br />

correlate of the pair “engineering”/ “historical sensibility” was “medicine”/ “eros.” Philosophy could offer<br />

a cure to desire, or it could expose itself to the danger of desire. Plato was torn between both possibilities.<br />

By the Hellenistic period, philosophy would have resolved itself into either “science” or a “way of life”:<br />

purely intellectual eros, or practical healing. Carried over into the philosophical discourse, the rhetoric of<br />

healing amounts to this: a fundamental failure to get at what is really at stake.<br />

453<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Returning briefly to Aristotle’s Metaphysics, we find a sense for the complexity of the relation of<br />

philosophy and healing. <strong>The</strong> second section of Book Gamma begins:<br />

“Being” is said in many ways, but in relation to some one thing and one nature, and not merely as a<br />

homonym (as a word that sounds the same but has completely difference meanings), but as “healthy”<br />

[is said] always in relation to “health,” either guarding it, or producing it, or being a sign of it, or<br />

receptive of it.<br />

<strong>The</strong> claim, on the surface, is straightforward enough. <strong>The</strong> word “being” is used differently, but not in the<br />

way that “bank” is used differently. In the case of “bank,” there are two senses that have basically nothing<br />

to with one another and are only accidently related through a common sounding name. “Being,” in<br />

contrast, is said differently in the same way as “health.” A medicine is healthy because it produces health.<br />

A certain food is healthy because it “guards” health. A “healthy” skin tone is a sign of health. <strong>The</strong>se words<br />

mean “health” in different, but essentially related ways.<br />

<strong>The</strong> philosophical implications are immense, and also directly concern the relation of a “continental”<br />

and “analytic” approach. Whereas “analytic” philosophers will seek to dissolve the problems of ontology<br />

by pointing out the confusion between the “existential” and “copulary” use of “being,” Heidegger will<br />

return to Aristotle’s insight that the unifying sense of being cannot be conceived in terms of the relation<br />

of a genus to a species. But what interests me here is the choice of example. Why did Aristotle choose<br />

“health”? It is a good example, of course, but I would suggest that something much more is at stake.<br />

Perhaps Aristotle recognized that health, like Being, is one of those terms which touches on almost<br />

everything; which can relate to almost everything. Every natural substance, every form of human activity,<br />

can be healthy or unhealthy. Every aspect of appearance can potentially serve as a sign of health or<br />

unhealth. Health, this is to say, is a perspective from which the totality of human life can be appraised and<br />

considered. Moreover, though, health is the perspective which is most likely to be taken by a certain kind<br />

of person. It is the perspective of the sort of everyday rationality that has raised itself beyond superstition<br />

and yet remains deaf to the higher, deeper, more dangerous claims of philosophy – the sort of everyday<br />

rationality for which the goods of the body and of a still body-like soul remain the highest goods; for<br />

which the purpose of life is to keep on living without suffering and pain. It is the rationality that is averse<br />

to risk and danger, unless it takes the form of a risk of the cure, and for which the infinite mind has been<br />

put in the service of guarding finite goods. Treated from the perspective of health, philosophy itself must<br />

appear like a dangerous thing. Is love and friendship healthy? Is politics healthy? Is thinking healthy? Is<br />

life itself... healthy. It is no surprise that, in Plato’s Symposium, the third to speak about love, following the<br />

pure rhetorician (Phaedrus) and the legal expert (Pausanius), but before the comic poet (Aristophanes),<br />

the tragic poet (Agathon), and the philosopher Socrates, is the medical doctor Eryximachus. His words,<br />

454


somewhat banal as they are, are soon superceded.<br />

For Plato, the chief rivals of the philosopher were sophists and poets. This is perhaps because, for Plato<br />

(and Socrates), philosophy had to assert its rights against those who claimed an immediate, intuitive, but<br />

unreasoned access to the truth. Aristotle, we might say, already began to recognize that, with his “scientific”<br />

reformulation of philosophy, sophists and poets no longer could give us much to fear. A far greater danger,<br />

intimate to scientific philosophy and yet still infinitely far from it, was the physician; the one who would<br />

reduce everything, and even what is highest – politics, friendship (love), and the truth – to the terms of<br />

health.<br />

It is precisely this danger that we still face, now more than ever, and that threatens to derail both<br />

continental philosophy and analytic philosophy.<br />

<strong>The</strong> idea that philosophy should be understood as a therapy is often identified above all with the post-<br />

Tractatus Wittgenstein. In the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Wittgenstein took over Frege and Russel’s<br />

project – trying to explain how truthful statements are possible while rigorously circumscribing the<br />

limits of what can be said – by showing that the logical structure of propositions resembles the logical<br />

structure of the world. In his later philosophy, however, he would come to realize that it was wrong to<br />

try to articulate a single account of language and the propositional truth. He would come to think of<br />

language as consisting of innumerable different, irreducible “language games,” each with its own rules.<br />

<strong>The</strong> standard philosophical conception of language, in which “names” refer to “things,” is merely one<br />

very simple language game. It cannot be generalized; and indeed no single theory of the essence of<br />

language is possible. This suggests, in turn, that traditional philosophy has allowed itself to fall into error<br />

by failing to recognize how words are really used in the “language games” that belong to various “forms<br />

of life.” Instead of trying to describe these language games, which is the proper method for philosophy,<br />

philosophers have instead come up with explanatory pictures – abstract, misleading, and one-sided – for<br />

the essence of language.<br />

Nothing that I have yet said would justify a therapeutic understanding of philosophy. <strong>The</strong> concept of<br />

“language games” and “forms of life” could justify a purely theoretical vision of philosophy, in which<br />

the proper philosophical method does not reject theoretical knowledge as such, but merely its tendency<br />

toward abstraction and reductionism. <strong>The</strong> therapeutic reading of Wittgenstein involves a further claim: that<br />

the end of philosophy is not to achieve knowledge, but to “cure” reasoning of the delusions, endemic to<br />

traditional philosophy, that make it impossible to get on with other things, be they the pursuit of properly<br />

scientific knowledge or simply life itself. It is in this way that the §133 of the Philosophical Investigations<br />

is often read:<br />

455<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

It is not our aim to refine or complete the system of rules for the use of our words in unheard-of ways.<br />

For the clarity that we are aiming at is indeed complete clarity. But this simply means that the<br />

philosophical problems should completely disappear.<br />

<strong>The</strong> real discovery is the one that makes me capable of stopping doing philosophy when I want<br />

to. – <strong>The</strong> one that gives philosophy peace, so that it is no longer tormented by questions which<br />

bring it itself in question. – Instead, we now demonstrate a method, by examples; and the series of<br />

examples can be broken off. – Problems are solved (difficulties eliminated), not a single problem.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is not a philosophical method, though there are indeed methods, like different therapies. 3<br />

<strong>The</strong> literature on Wittgenstein is vast, and there is certainly much debate as to whether his philosophical<br />

method (to the extent that he has a single such method) is principally “therapeutic” or “theoretical.” I do<br />

not hope to answer this, or offer more than the most summary reading of Wittgenstein. What I would<br />

suggest, however, is that his therapeutic tendency is intimately related to his engineering approach to<br />

philosophical problems. Philosophy itself is a problem that must be solved. And this problem, the problem<br />

of philosophy, consists in the way in which it keeps on presenting particular problems to the philosopher,<br />

who in each case is duty-bound to solve them. For Wittgenstein, the consummate philosopher-as-engineer,<br />

the only way to “move on” is to engineer an absolute solution to all philosophical problems. But, in a<br />

certain way, one could say that these problems only exist because philosophy has always been in the<br />

business of engineering solutions that would explain how human language is able to do what it does. To<br />

engineer a “perfect solution” would be to reverse-engineer the multitude of language games and forms of<br />

life that the philosopher, seeking solutions, has always turned away from.<br />

This, I think, explains both the tremendous seduction of Wittgenstein’s approach and its limits, or indeed<br />

– perhaps – its pointlessness. If you think of philosophy as engineering, and yet not simply as engineer<br />

(who is usually just happy to be constructing solutions), but rather from the perspective of a philosophical<br />

engineer who, through an extraordinary insight, has become aware of the Sisyphean nature of his own<br />

task, then the “therapeutic” solution seems like the only answer. But if you do not think of philosophy as<br />

engineering – if you think that the philosopher is not one who is compelled to answer, and thus “do away<br />

with,” philosophical problems that present themselves with a certain immediate clarity, but rather one who<br />

seeks to put himself in the position in which he can begin to sense philosophical problems in their depth –<br />

and above all by getting past the “engineering” perspective that imposes itself on us – then Wittgenstein’s<br />

3 Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, tr. G.E.M. Anscombe (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2001), p. 44.<br />

456


therapeutic approach appears as nothing more than a rather long, and no doubt instructive, Sackgasse (one-<br />

way-street) in the history of philosophy. Seen from another perspective, the struggles of past philosophers<br />

and the systems of concepts that they have contrived might appear as anything but vain and unprofitable<br />

errors. Rather: they could seem like extraordinary attempts to grasp hold of elusive, difficult truths by<br />

entering into the proper form of questioning. If metaphysics, nevertheless, must now appear questionable,<br />

it is not because the struggles of philosophers towards conceptual clarity have been pointless, but rather<br />

because metaphysical answers seem to foreclose more radical forms of questioning.<br />

Because, in the manner that I have suggested, the therapeutic method of late Wittgenstein arises out of<br />

the engineering approach to philosophy that he himself carried out with an extreme consequence, I do<br />

not think it, in and of itself, offers either a solution to philosophy as such, or a challenge to philosophy<br />

as such. Rather, it signals a turning point in his philosophy, of meaning only for his philosophy – in<br />

which the engineering approach turns back upon its origins, discovering that the questions, to which it<br />

seeks answers, are born of disquiet within philosophical thought itself. Incapable of getting outside the<br />

engineering approach to which he remained profoundly committed, Wittgenstein – and this is both the<br />

source of his rigor and his superficiality – could not really ever quite get to the point of wondering if<br />

the incessant problems with which philosophy tormented itself were not themselves symptoms of other<br />

questions that we must begin to ask ourselves, but can only begin to do so if we wager ourselves on<br />

concepts that we know to be fallible and provisional.<br />

In Wittgenstein, this is to say, philosophical therapy is justified as the mark of the absolute commitment<br />

to a certain philosophical path. What is much more troubling is when this therapeutic approach is put to<br />

use in order to “heal” its rifts, and above all, the rifts between “analytic” and “continental.” In the name of<br />

“healing,” the divisions in philosophy, and philosophy itself, will be put to rest. I have already suggested<br />

how this “cure” operates, but now I will turn to a recent manifestation of this “healing” approach.<br />

In the year 1999, right at the end of the century that had seen philosophy become so divided, Harvard<br />

University Press republished an English translation of a short text by Franz Rosenzweig, titled<br />

Understanding the Sick and Healthy: A View of <strong>World</strong>, Man, and God. Franz Rosenzweig ranks, together<br />

with Levinas and Martin Buber, as one of the great Jewish philosophers of the twentieth century, and his<br />

Star of Redemption is a masterwork of the dense, obscure, rich style for which “continental philosophy” is<br />

known. While Rosenzweig engages in a sustained and far-reaching critique of the Western philosophical<br />

tradition, he does not reject the idea that thinking must find its own language to express itself. Rather,<br />

he opposes a new idiom to the idiom of metaphysics. But this new idiom (which itself involves a kind<br />

of engineering) is put in the service of becoming open to a “Jewish” thinking, embodied in scripture,<br />

that is prior to the truth of Greek philosophy. Understanding the Sick and Healthy involves the attempt<br />

457<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

to communicate the “new thinking” of the Star of Redemption in a more accessible, and less recondite<br />

language. What makes this republication so interesting is the author of the “new introduction,” included<br />

together with the old introduction by Nahum Glatzer: none other than Hilary Putnam, a celebrated analytic<br />

philosopher known for his work in the philosophy of science.<br />

In the introduction, which is reprinted in his 2008 book “Jewish Philosophy as a Way of Life: Rosenzweig,<br />

Buber, Levinas, Wittgenstein,” Hilary Putnam seeks to show the philosophical similarities between<br />

Rosenzweig’s “little book” and the work of late Wittgenstein. As he explains, anticipating the bafflement<br />

of his readers – and especially those who are familiar with his own body of work:<br />

To my enormous surprise, I found this work reminding me of the last philosopher in the world I<br />

had expected to compare with Franz Rosenzweig, namely, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and I propose to<br />

explain a part of the illumination I find in Rosenzweig by presenting such a comparison.<br />

Wittgenstein? Rosenzweig and Wittgenstein? Yet, on reflection, the comparison should not be as<br />

startling as it first seemed to me, for both thinkers are influenced by Kierkegaard (if Wittgenstein<br />

was not a theist, he nevertheless had an obvious sympathy with religion), and both share a<br />

profoundly critical attitude toward the traditional philosophical search for a theory of the ‘essence’<br />

of things. I cannot imagine Wittgenstein reading through Rosenzweig’s <strong>The</strong> Star of Redemption.<br />

Yet I can very easily imagine him reading and enjoying Rosenzweig’s “little book” (It was<br />

Wittgenstein, after all, who remarked, “When Tolstoy just tells a story he impresses me infinitely<br />

more than when he addresses the reader,” and in the present book Rosenzweig adopts the manner<br />

of a storyteller.). 4<br />

Hilary Putnam’s introduction does an admirable job of opening up the text, and leading into it, without<br />

preempting the need to let it speak for itself. His treatment of the similarities between Rosenzweig and<br />

Wittgenstein is more suggestive than exhaustive, and he resists giving a simplistic account of these. It is<br />

difficult, however, after reading Rosenzweig’s “little book,” to avoid concluding that the deepest similarity<br />

between them rests on a shared “therapeutic” or “healing” concept of the task of thinking. <strong>The</strong> illusion to<br />

Kierkegaard is decisive. As Putnam writes:<br />

What philosophy represents here is not a technical subject at all, but a temptation to which all who<br />

think of themselves as religious may be subject at one time or another: the temptation to substitute<br />

words, especially words which have no religious content because they have no internal relation to a<br />

4 Hilary Putnam, “Introduction” in Franz Rosenzweig, Understanding the Sick and the Healthy: A View of the <strong>World</strong>, Man,<br />

and God, tr. and int. Nahum Glatzer (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999), p. 2.<br />

458


genuine religious life, for that kind of life. This is the very temptation that Kierkegaard was centrally<br />

concerned with combating. Kierkegaard didn’t combat the temptation to substitute abstract talk for<br />

actually living the religious life because he imagined that most nineteenth-century Danish Christians<br />

were about to become metaphysicians – obviously not! Rosenzweig did not think that most twentieth-<br />

century German Jews were about to become Hegelians. <strong>The</strong>se existentialist thinkers saw metaphysics<br />

as an exaggerated form of a disease to which we are all subject. It is this “disease” that the “physicians”<br />

in Rosenzweig’s parable are out to diagnose and cure. 5<br />

While this “healing” project stands at the periphery of Wittgenstein, who is driven to it by the necessity<br />

of his philosophical compulsions, it is central to Rosenzweig, who, in this sense, is able to give a more<br />

radical, but also more “abstract” or “reductive” formulation of it. As Putnam puts it, a bit earlier: “Although<br />

Wittgenstein says that the roots of philosophical illusion lie deep in our language and deep in us, he never<br />

attempts to provide a detailed account of these roots. For Rosenzweig’s purposes, however, it is essential<br />

to do just that.” 6<br />

This last point is decisive. It suggests what is really at stake for Putnam, the Atheist --- but ethnically<br />

Jewish philosopher – in returning to his Jewish roots. Nothing else than the roots of the “healing project,”<br />

and the “metaphysical disease” to which it answers, that he also finds in Wittgenstein. But why is<br />

“metaphysics” itself a disease? What are these roots that Rosenzweig will discover? <strong>The</strong> answer appears<br />

in one particular telling passage. Invoking Aristotle’s famous claim that philosophy begins with wonder,<br />

Rosenzweig describes how the philosopher, wondering as others wonder, becomes impatient: “...he is<br />

unwilling to accept the process of life and the passing of the numbness wonder has brought. Such relief<br />

comes too slowly. He insists on a solution immediately – at the very instant of his being overcome – and<br />

at the very place wonder struck him. He stands quiet, motionless. He separates his experience of wonder<br />

from the continuous stream of life, isolating it. / This is the way his thought proceeds. He does not permit<br />

his wonder, stored as it is, to be released into the flow of life. He steps outside of the continuity of life and<br />

consequently the continuity of thought is broken. And there he begins stubbornly to reflect. Of necessity,<br />

he must hook the “problem” from where he stands. He has forcibly extracted thought’s “object” and<br />

“subject” from the flow of like and he entrenches himself within them. Wonder stagnates, is perpetuated in<br />

the motionless mirror of his mediation: that is in the subject. He has it well hooked; it is securely fastened,<br />

and it persists in his benumbed immobility. <strong>The</strong> stream of life has been replaced by something submissive<br />

– statuesque, subjugated.” 7<br />

5 Putnam, “Introduction,” p. 3.<br />

6 Putnam, “Introduction,” p. 2.<br />

7 Franz Rosenzweig, Understanding the Sick and the Healthy, pp. 40-41.<br />

459<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Philosophy is “diseased” because it stands off from the flow of life. Health is life, the flow of life:<br />

everything fixed and congealed into a determinate form is unhealthy, deathly. What is interesting about<br />

this passage is not only an obvious and unrepentant vitalism from which Putnam makes no attempt to<br />

distant himself. Rather, it is that philosophy here, through a sort of radical lapse of “historical sense,”<br />

appears purely as the “engineering” of solutions to feelings of wonders (philosophical questions) that<br />

the philosopher, in his impatience, refuses to release back into the flux of life. <strong>The</strong> affinity between<br />

Rosenzweig and Wittgenstein is profound, but, for just this reason, Rosenzweig’s therapy has nothing<br />

more to say to philosophy, or even ordinary thinking, than Wittgenstein’s. To generalize – to move from a<br />

specific therapy for a specific, singular problem to a panacea for diseased philosophical thought as such –<br />

is to turn the specific act of philosophical therapy into what we might best call an “ideology” of health; the<br />

enforcement of “health” and “healing” as an self-evident, everyday perspective that foreclosed philosophy,<br />

politics, and love.<br />

I do not wish to suggest that Rosenzweig himself prescribed to this “ideology” of health – though I do<br />

find his critique of metaphysics in the name of a new, religious thinking, based on grammar and the three<br />

fold relation of God, the world, and man too simplistic. Rosenzweig himself saw the convalescence from<br />

philosophy, which he imagines as a three-week cure in a sanitarium, as the beginning rather than the end.<br />

Thus he writes in the final chapter of his “Little Book” – titled “back to work”:<br />

It is so difficult to realize that all verification lies ahead, that death is the ultimate verification<br />

of life, that to live means to die. He who withdraws from life may think he has avoided death;<br />

however, he has merely foregone life, and death, instead of being avoided, closes in from all sides<br />

and creeps into one’s very heart, a petrified heart. If he is to be restored to life he must recognize<br />

the sovereignty of death... <strong>The</strong>re is no remedy for death; not even health. A healthy man, however,<br />

has the strength to continue towards the grave. <strong>The</strong> sick man invokes death and lets himself be<br />

carried away in mortal fear. In health, even death comes at the “proper” time. 8<br />

This insight, no doubt, passes far beyond all superficial rhetoric of “healing,” and suggests that<br />

philosophical therapy is not the absolute panacea of perfect quiescence, but the preparation for a life lived<br />

toward another deeper truth, and for a thinking that is disquieted by a deeper wonder.<br />

Health, for Rosenzweig, is fundamentally a living towards, rather than in flight from, death. Metaphysics<br />

is the flight from death through the false eternity of philosophical constructs. This last thought, I would<br />

8 Rosenzweig, Understanding the Sick and the Healthy, p. 103.<br />

460


argue, opens onto a more penetrating philosophical perspective than the ideology of “healing.” To follow<br />

this out, though, it is necessary to invoke another “Jewish” thinker about whom Hilary Putnam has<br />

nothing to say in his book on Jewish philosophy: the avowedly Atheist Sigmund Freud. Freud, of course,<br />

is the founder of psychoanalysis, which is at once a “body of theoretical knowledge” – even a “science”<br />

– and “therapy.” Yet his thought, I would suggest, involves a very different, richer and more challenging,<br />

understanding of what “healing” is. “Healing,” for Freud, has nothing to do with achieving “perfect<br />

peace”: rather, psychoanalysis opens us up to the disquiet at the core of our being by allowing us to live<br />

with this truth. This is what Eric Santner, in his book on Freud and Rosenzweig, understands, applying a<br />

Freudian concept, as the uncanny. 9<br />

It is not difficult to imagine why Hilary Putnam might pass over Freud: psychoanalysis represents a<br />

challenge to the concept of science (consisting of propositions, based on evidence, that are falsifiable) that<br />

continues to dominate analytic philosophy. From such a perspective it is not too difficult to accommodate<br />

poetry, religion, or mysticism: none of these really overlap with the domain of Empirical science.<br />

It is possible to say, as Hilary Putnam will: “I am still a religious person, and I am still a naturalistic<br />

philosopher... A naturalistic philosopher, but not a reductionist.” 10 A system of thought like Freudian<br />

psychoanalysis, building an edifice of concepts that lack clear empirical reference and propositions<br />

that cannot be falsified, offers a more disquieting, indeed absolute challenge, to the dominant forms of<br />

naturalism, even if Sigmund Freud, unlike the three philosophers Putnam will speak about, did certainly<br />

consider himself both a naturalist and an ardent atheist.<br />

If we look at one of Freud’s early manuscripts, his “Project for a Scientific Psychology,” 11 we find a hint<br />

of how Freud’s own scientific premises can lead to a concept of science that will ultimately challenge the<br />

“engineering perspective,” offering the prospect of a very different critique of metaphysics, and a different<br />

sense for what philosophy might be. In this text, Freud, seeking a biological basis for psychoanalytic<br />

insight – it is here indeed that his reductionist tendencies are greatest – distinguishes between exogenic<br />

and endogenic stimuli. Exogenic stimuli come from “outside” the organism, and involve an excitation<br />

of “sensory” neurones that, conveyed to “motor” neurones, leads to an immediate ceasing of the original<br />

stimuli. You poke a worm with a stick; it moves away. Endogenic stimuli, such as hunger and sexual<br />

desire, are much more subtle and curious. In this case, the stimulation originates within the organism. <strong>The</strong><br />

9 Eric Santner, <strong>The</strong> Psychotheology of Everyday Life: Reflections on Freud and Rosenzweig (Chicago: University of<br />

Chicago Press, 2001).<br />

10 Hilary Putnam, Jewish Philosophy as a Guide to Life: Rosenzweig, Buber, Levinas, Wittgenstein (Bloomington:<br />

University of Indiana, 2008), p. 5.<br />

11 Sigmund Freud, “<strong>The</strong> Project of a Scientific Psychology,” in <strong>The</strong> Origins of Psycho-analysis, tr. James Strachey (New<br />

York: Basic Books, 1954), pp. 347-445.<br />

461<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

organism can no longer get away from the stimulus; there is no longer a space in which it could get away.<br />

Instead, it can only seek to quiet the inner disturbance by transforming the world; but this requires it to<br />

become more powerful, more alive and quick, and hence more subject to the very stimuli that it seeks to<br />

still.<br />

<strong>The</strong> “Project” is manifestly reductionist. Yet the structural opposition between the exogenic and endogic,<br />

I would argue, provide a powerful means to discovering the complicity between the “engineering”<br />

approach of analytic philosophy and a “healing” approach that undoes philosophy. What I have referred<br />

to as the “ideology of healing” may be regarded as a special case of what I will call “ideology as such”:<br />

the projection of endogenic events onto an exogenic space. (A simple, everyday example: we believe that<br />

we love the one whom we love because of who he or she is. Love becomes a positive exogenic stimulus<br />

– pursuit as the opposite of flight). <strong>The</strong> essence of the “engineering” approach to philosophy consists in<br />

regarding all “philosophical problems” as if they were “exogenic stimuli” that must be “dealt with” by<br />

constructing a solution and thus finding a way out. Wittgenstein’s genius consists in taking this “engineering<br />

approach” to its furthest consequence – he is not held back by ordinary, more human scruples – at which<br />

point it becomes clear that the “exogenic” problems must be folded back into an “endogenic” root. But, at<br />

just this point, the “therapeutic” model of philosophy intervenes: instead of seeking to live in “endogenic”<br />

truth, it imagines an ultimate “way out” from the compulsive need to find “ways out.” At the very moment<br />

when Wittgenstein has exhausted “ideology,” leading us like Moses to the threshold, the “therapeutic<br />

approach” seeks to dismiss philosophy, to dismiss thinking: as if thinking and ideology were the same<br />

thing.<br />

Seen from this perspective, we can get a better sense for the proper critique of metaphysics. <strong>The</strong> problem<br />

with metaphysics is not the abstraction of its concepts, or its tendency to interrupt the flow of “ordinary<br />

life” and distort “common sense.” Ordinary language, as Putnam (and Wittgenstein) reminds us, is itself<br />

subject to “delusion,” but these delusions have nothing to do with the inherent, necessary, and benevolent<br />

abstraction that, as Levi-Strauss has demonstrated, belongs to the “ordinary language” of even the most<br />

so-called primitive cultures. <strong>The</strong> source of delusion, rather, is the extroversion of the endogenic; the<br />

projection of all the problems of life out into a world in which we can cope with them by engineering<br />

solutions. <strong>The</strong> problem with metaphysics, rather, is that by remaining dependent, in the formulation<br />

of its concepts, on metaphors drawn from an exogenetically articulated space, it merely presents, in a<br />

more subtle, sophisticated, sublimated form the cardinal error of ordinary language. This explains why<br />

the linguistic turn, properly conceived, presents such a powerful philosophical antidote to metaphysics.<br />

metaphysics has, from the beginning, involved the attempt to extrovert language into the world – and this<br />

gesture remains even when the “metaphysical baggage” has been discarded, as with the referential theory<br />

of meaning in favor with analytic philosophers. Radically conceived, the linguistic turn involves returning<br />

462


language to an endogenic signification – precisely what Psychoanalysis (above all Lacan) does when it<br />

tries to understand the signifier in terms of desire.<br />

It is for this reason that pragmatism (to which Putnam also prescribes) and ordinary language philosophy,<br />

seductive as they are for those who have cannot see past the “ideology of health,” are so dubious, despite<br />

(indeed because of) the overwhelming claims of “common sense” that they marshal to their side. In place<br />

of the many errors of metaphysics, they give us its cardinal error. Common sense and ordinary language,<br />

and the belief that there are “things to do” out there in the world, are not the remedy for metaphysics, but<br />

the fountainhead of its mistakes. Of course: there are things to do; everyday life is also important, in some<br />

sense much more important. Health, and healthy living are good, very good. <strong>The</strong> errors of metaphysics are<br />

merely more subtle, abstract versions of the errors necessary to live; errors that are of the very essence of<br />

healthy life. But everyday life is not living towards and in truth – though the life in truth is also not a life<br />

outside the everyday; not a life lived in the caves of mystics or the solipsistic ovens of philosophers.<br />

Rosenzweig’s “new thinking,” as Putnam recognizes, does pass beyond the threshold, getting to the root of<br />

the “philosophical disease.” Yet I would suggest that “religion” becomes another way of extroverting the<br />

endogenic. Rosenzweig’s God is no longer onto-theological, no longer conceived as the “ultimate being.”<br />

Instead, he becomes the pure essence of extroversion. <strong>The</strong> notion of the “Other” could itself be understood<br />

in this way as a purely, rigorously relational conception of exteriority. Freud’s “Moses and Monotheism”<br />

could be seen as an answer to this. But it is his notion of the “death drive,” of the drive toward death as the<br />

most radical “endogenic” tendency of our being, of which provides the most radical answer to the claims<br />

of religion. Yet perhaps the endogenic is merely the perversion of the exogenic. Between endogenic and<br />

exogenic truth no reconciliation is possible. We are left with a decision. To do philosophy, to think is to<br />

decide for a truth, without sufficient justification, and to commit to living in it. Healing, which seeks to<br />

vacate decisions before they can be made, is the death of philosophy and of any truth.<br />

463<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

<strong>The</strong> Practicing of Feminism as Healing <strong>Humanities</strong><br />

Ra-Keum Huh<br />

Ewha Womans University<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> are the act of uncovering human values. Through this act, it tries to realize the existential<br />

value of human beings. <strong>The</strong> main objective of ‘<strong>Humanities</strong> Healing’ could be understood as restoring<br />

self-dignity through self-reflection based on humanities and providing the strength to discover that ray of<br />

hope in the midst of despair. <strong>Humanities</strong> helps those who feel isolated or hurt to look back on their lives,<br />

to break through the siege of hopelessness and by encouraging an autonomous and confident approach<br />

in daily life, to regain command of their own lives. <strong>The</strong>refore, the healing power of the humanities could<br />

be expanded and applied to people of all social classes and all generations who are undergoing hardships<br />

in various circumstances. In today’s world, everyone is in dire need of the strength to find one’s place in<br />

society. This strength is found when, through self-reflection, one recovers one’s sense of self-dignity and<br />

endeavors to enhance the quality of one’s own life and lead a life of action. We can find evidence of this<br />

dire need through the numerous news articles detailing the current popularity of religious ascetic practices<br />

such as ‘meditation’ and ‘healing.’<br />

<strong>The</strong> following excerpt from a news article presents the opinions of experts on the reason for such interest<br />

in healing.<br />

[…] Experts see this healing syndrome that has swept over Korean society as the result of the<br />

uncertainty and isolation that people feel in today’s hyper-competitive atmosphere where to fall<br />

behind means to become a loser. More and more people are getting hurt by the demands of this<br />

fast-paced society and of human relations but they keep on living without receiving proper healing<br />

because they don’t know how. Hwang Sang-min, a psychology professor at Yonsei University, said,<br />

“While everyone is aware that their lives are difficult, they are not able to discover any meaning in<br />

464


their lives to make it worthwhile.” He also saw the conditions for a happy life having changed with<br />

the hyper-competition of this knowledge-based society having shaken up stability and bringing<br />

about frequent changes within families or workplaces. “This generation had been living by running<br />

straight ahead without looking back. Now, the concept of quality of life is shifting from living<br />

according to a capitalistic order to living according to one’s true desires.” “Healing is different<br />

from ‘well-being,’ which is the concept of living well for oneself. Instead of fulfilling one’s greed,<br />

healing teaches one to let go of the greed and pursue a restoration of relations.” 1<br />

We could attempt to analyze from various angles the recent ‘healing syndrome’ of people trying to look<br />

after their own hurts but as the article points out, this phenomenon, people seeking relief from the hurt<br />

and fatigue they feel in this competitive society, speaks to the sense of anxiety manifest in our society.<br />

Although Korea is now considered a world economic power, this change took place in only a few decades.<br />

While undergoing this change, Korean society came to be ruled by an optimistic view about economic<br />

development and the belief that ‘money solves all problems.’ However, the darker side to this change was<br />

the accumulation of anxiety and fatigue from a fight for survival and of the hurt and despair of those who<br />

lagged behind in the competition. <strong>The</strong> fact that Korea’s suicide rate is the highest among OECD member<br />

countries points to the consequences of such a ‘pressurized society.’ While the welfare budget might have<br />

gotten bigger, life expectancy might have gotten longer due to medical advances and the state of nutrition<br />

might have gotten better, the record-high suicide rate shows how weak our society has become in the<br />

mental foundation of discovering a meaning of life.<br />

<strong>The</strong> introduction of a multi-cultural lifestyle as Korea moves toward becoming a global society also<br />

provides a backdrop to this phenomenon. People are aware that the life goals and life models that they had<br />

grown up seeing are no longer maintainable in a global society. Yet they are unable to set a new direction<br />

for their lives and this has led to a sense of serious anxiety. For example, Confucius’ teaching that “at 15<br />

years of age, one should set one’s mind on studies” is no longer applicable in today’s world. Education<br />

is no longer about learning about human nature. It is now about job training and achieving survival and<br />

wealth. In today’s world, even if one spent most of one’s 20s studying for a test, one’s place in society<br />

would not be guaranteed. This is not how the previous generation had lived. <strong>The</strong> average life cycle, in<br />

which one marries in the 20s and finds one’s place in society in the 30s is no longer applicable. Marriage<br />

is now a choice, not the essential step it had been for the majority of adults in the past. <strong>The</strong> gender roles<br />

of men and women have shifted greatly. Families used to be a source of strength in overcoming life’s<br />

hardships, providing a meaning to life. However, families nowadays no longer play the role they used to<br />

1 Lee Eun-joo, Kim Jung-eun. “South Korea is in Healing.” Seoul Daily News, Aug 18, 2012, online news version.<br />

465<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

in the past. Ultimately, people are undergoing changes that make it harder for them to find direction in<br />

their lives. At the same time, everyone is seeking meaning for their lives.<br />

However, the recent popularity of healing seems to concentrate on ‘spiritual healing’ gained through<br />

religious ascetic practices and meditations and this has some limits. Can the pain that one feels when<br />

having failed in a social relationship or falling behind in social competition be healed only by self-<br />

examination? Most of the techniques trending today seem to pursue healing through such a direction of<br />

transcending the context of life. That is, it seems to advocate a self-reflection of how ‘worldly’ one has<br />

become and to gain peace of mind and mental stability by recovering an ‘unworldly’ spiritualism. If this<br />

is misconstrued as a “the world is how I view it” transcendentalism, this form of healing will merely be<br />

preserving the order of reality that is producing so much pain and victims, and it will expose people to<br />

continual relapses.<br />

If so, in which direction should humanities be applied as to bring healing? <strong>Humanities</strong>, as an act of<br />

exploring the significance of human being, should not stay at asking questions. By asking questions in<br />

humanities, they should go on to discover their own value and to practice the value that they discovered.<br />

As such, humanities healing should include the following: the act of questioning which problems in<br />

the order of today’s world bring mental and physical pain to humans and the act of restoring the self-<br />

autonomous ability of humans to change the world. I would like to explore the possibility of this answer<br />

in the practice of feminism which has taken place in the past half-century. In order to do so, I will start by<br />

considering a discussion that has recently taken place in humanities with its healing as its main objective.<br />

1. A <strong>Humanities</strong> Paradigm of Healing<br />

Focusing on the fact that humanities plays an important role in embracing human pain and restoring self-<br />

dignity, an application field of philosophical practice called ‘philosophical consultancy’ is garnering<br />

much attention. In this field, the therapeutical element found in the distinct function of philosophy is<br />

reinforced. “Philosophical consultancy is a field where philosophers trained in consultancy help those who<br />

are suffering from a confusion of values, those who are unable to find the key to solving their problems<br />

or those who suddenly feel despair at the meaninglessness of life. In helping these people, the consultant<br />

philosophers show them how to overcome their difficulties on their own.” 2 Lee Jin-nam introduces<br />

2 Germany’s Gerd Achenbach is considered to be a founding figure of the field of ‘philosophical consultancy’ in which<br />

a philosophical approach is taken in mental and emotional therapy sessions. Actual application of this consultancy in<br />

medical field began in earnest when Gerd Achenbach established a philosophical consulting clinic in 1982 and conducted<br />

clinical therapy sessions through philosophical consultancy. Consultant philosophers try to help people solve issues that<br />

466


philosophical consultancy with the following words: “<strong>The</strong> subjects of philosophical consultancy are<br />

people suffering from an illness of the mind. <strong>The</strong> most effective way to treat them is conversing with<br />

them in counseling. <strong>The</strong> person who conducts the healing are the subjects themselves. <strong>The</strong> external role<br />

of the consultant philosopher is to discuss with the subjects any inherent discrepancies in the subject’s<br />

view on the human or the world found during the course of counseling and to help them resolve these<br />

discrepancies through philosophical thinking.” 3<br />

In a recently published article, Lou Marinoff, a major proponent of philosophical consultancy, diagnosed<br />

the many problems that modern humans experience as ‘cultural illness’ and prescribed humanities as the<br />

way to solve illness that come from cultural factors. 4<br />

“Overall, the wide range of health issues that bother people living in advanced economies - depression,<br />

the interest in obesity, social anxiety disorders, sexual disorders, nameless disorders that come from the<br />

side effects of taking a cocktail of prescription drugs - are illness that arise from cultural factors and not<br />

from biological causes. <strong>The</strong>se illness are problems that touch upon the core of humanity. To lead fulfilling<br />

lives, these illness must be approached from a humanities’ perspective and be resolved within the field of<br />

humanities.”<br />

However, the specifics of the diagnosis and prescription that the author introduced in his article were a<br />

bit baffling to me. I have no objections to his diagnosis that the amazing advances in modern science<br />

and technology have, rather than promoting human health and happiness, become tools with which large<br />

pharmaceutical corporations and the insurance industry have used to colonialize human bodies. This<br />

speaks to the context of a barren capitalistic life in this time and age when even humanistic values are<br />

being calculated in terms of how much they are worth money-wise. However, we need to take another<br />

look at his argument that implicitly points to the development of a secular humanities as the reason for this<br />

colonialization. Mr. Marinoff’s argument is that although the humanities of Enlightenment, the philosophy<br />

of nature and empirical philosophy replacing theological explanations, freed humans from the dogmatic<br />

and despotic rule of religion, it also led to the age of mechanism and determinism breeding the so-called<br />

“paradox of Enlightenment.” This is how “secular humanities,” alongside the myth of modern science that<br />

even humans could be understood in terms of cause and effect, started turning into nihilism and a denial of<br />

anyone can experience, such as the moral dilemmas, workplace conflicts, confusion of values and objectives, confusion<br />

rising from human relations and sense of self-identity and a sudden sense of loss, through philosophical conversations.<br />

An actual philosophical consulting process applies the thoughts of those who provided philosophical wisdom helpful in<br />

examining life regardless of the field they worked in, such as Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Freud and Einstein.<br />

3 “<strong>Humanities</strong> Healing for a Happy Life.” Report on <strong>Humanities</strong> Korea Project Phase 1. Kangwon National University.<br />

4 Lou Marinoff. <strong>The</strong> 11th International Conference on Philosophical Practice. Kangwon National University. July 16, 2012.<br />

467<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

human nature. This, in turn, led to a new ‘cultural illness’ as yet experienced by humankind. <strong>The</strong> problem<br />

rises with Mr. Marinoff’s following opinion on humanities and anti-humanities. Mr. Marinoff seeks the<br />

source of modern man’s illness in the spirit of postmodernism that has its roots in secular humanities. He<br />

calls the contemporary era a post-modern, post-Christian, post-humanities, post-intellect age and sees this<br />

as the context for modern man’s illness such as nihilism and depression. 5<br />

If this is the cultural cause breeding modern man’s illness, which direction should humanities healing<br />

take? Should it return to the modern, to Christianity, to traditional humanities? If the spirit of humanities<br />

which can help people escape nihilism and hopelessness is not to found by returning to traditional<br />

Christianity or traditional <strong>Humanities</strong>, in which direction of humanities could it be found 6 As Mr. Marinoff<br />

argues, did secular humanities and a cause-and-effect understanding of humans lead to this post-modern<br />

nihilism?<br />

<strong>The</strong> problem is not in the secularity found in the modern spirit of mechanism but in its tendency to think<br />

of oneself as being representative of the spirit of humanities. Thus, the more dangerous thing would be<br />

to diagnose the post-modern spirit of humanities, which attempts to deconstructe such representative<br />

understanding of human, as the source of cultural illness. <strong>The</strong> problem is not in a mechanistic or secular<br />

understanding itself but in trying to establish the absolute truth that applies to everything.<br />

<strong>The</strong> post-modern spirit of humanities is a critical approach to the problems arising from the “uniqueness of<br />

representation” that Enlightenment humanities upheld. If we keep in mind the limits of the Enlightenment<br />

humanities with its belief that one single truth was applicable to all metaphysical existence, we could<br />

actually use the post - moden spirits as an exit strategy to heal philosophical illness.<br />

A change in epistemology, the shift from postulating one single truth about the world and thoroughly<br />

investigating the truth to allow for a multiple of truths, took place in the Linguistic Turn of 20 th century<br />

philosophy, when truth (or the awareness of truth) was seen to be dependant on language. Since then,<br />

many humanities studies have been conducted in the form of seeking meaning in the humanities from<br />

a linguistic context. <strong>The</strong> results of such endeavors could be seen as post-humanities. <strong>The</strong>refore, post-<br />

humanities is not anti-humanities. It is humanities after a shift from a realism- and fundamentalism-based<br />

5 Lou Marinoff (2012), “<strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy: Restoring Well-Being in an Age of Culturally-Induced Illness.” Proceedings<br />

XI-ICPP & HT2012 <strong>The</strong> 11th International Conference on Philosophical Practice and the 4th International Conference on<br />

<strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>raphy, pp. 27-43.<br />

6 In his paper, Mr. Marinoff expressed hopes in an Asian spirit of humanities but he stops at expressing such hope and does<br />

not present a concrete alternative.<br />

468


paradigm of seeking one representative humanities truth to an anti-realism and linguistic paradigm.<br />

A post-modern deconstruction is not based on a nihilistic logic that states that there is no truth. Rather,<br />

it points to the falsity of the belief that there is only one single truth and it is a humanities exploration<br />

developed through the interaction of various competing statements of truth. As such, post-modern<br />

humanities is not the cultural source of modern illness. Rather, it could even be a useful resource in<br />

healing these modern illness which are brought about by a culture upholding one representative truth. A<br />

humanities paradigm accepting the possibility of multiple truths will open doors for humanities resources<br />

which had been excluded and suppressed under the rule of a single, absolute truth. Such a spirit of<br />

humanities is based on the acceptance that all human understanding and human value are influenced by<br />

particular cultural values and as such, no one knowing of truth could claim the privileged rights. With<br />

such a paradigm, different humanities beliefs formed in different contexts are not judged as being wrong<br />

or evaluated as being immature. Instead, their contextual significance is taken into consideration.<br />

Post-modern humanities accept the limits of partial human knowing, unlike traditional humanities<br />

which aim to give the privileged rights to episteme. As such, post-modern humanities lays the stage for a<br />

humanities of communication.<br />

Such humanities of communications are to be accepted as a means for the modern human to find answers<br />

when looking for a new direction of life in face of new social changes. It is inappropriate to regard it as a<br />

nihilistic tendency which produces today’s cultural illness.<br />

2. Feminist <strong>Humanities</strong> for the Socially Weak<br />

Feminist humanities, which led to women’s self-awareness as an subject, contributed to the development<br />

of a paradigm of humanities open to the possibility of multiple truths. Feminism starts by criticizing the<br />

patriarchical power structure which tries to place women and men in hierarchical order according to sex<br />

differences, presupposing that the differences between women and men are essential. It could be defined<br />

as theoretical and practical activities for the liberation of women.<br />

This is no different from declaring that women are equal to men as human agents. Such declaration also<br />

signifies that women are agents who understand the meaning of life based on their own life experiences.<br />

<strong>The</strong> source of power behind the practice of feminism lies in women trying to investigate the nature of the<br />

society and culture that they belong to by standing at a distance from it. <strong>The</strong>y then try to investigate how<br />

their society maintained the patriarchal order through viewing history from their own perspective. That is,<br />

it is born through the efforts of asking questions about the significance of the world and answering these<br />

questions by reviewing history and the women’s own experiences. As such, the practice of feminism is<br />

469<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

inseparable from the exploration efforts of humanities.<br />

Feminist humanities researchers have discovered in their exploration of the history of humanities that in<br />

a humanities tradition that upheld one representative type of humans, a humanistic ideal was established<br />

and only those who fit this ideal were accepted as a human subject in humanities. Those who didn’t fit<br />

the profile were considered deficient and lacking and subordinate to the subject. Instead of pursing their<br />

own understanding of humans and the world, they were forced to stay at an inferior position in which they<br />

were to follow the rules and play the roles that were given to them. However, the ability to criticize based<br />

on principles of humanities led to women uncovering that such representative humanity was a particular<br />

ideology based on the experience of men who were in a dominant position in the patriarchical hierarchy.<br />

This, in turn, fostered a sense of subjectivity among women. Now, women could place themselves in the<br />

position of human subject and define for themselves where their pain came from.<br />

<strong>The</strong> pain that comes from not having one’s beliefs and actions respected, the anger that comes from not<br />

being accepted as a being who can think and act for oneself were not restricted to some women only. <strong>The</strong><br />

self-contempt, hopelessness, despair and anxiety are commonly found in all those who are placed in a<br />

socially marginal position. Feminist humanities was an effective method used by women to encourage one<br />

another when placed in a socially weak position and to change the age-old culture and systems that kept<br />

women to the sides. As such, feminist humanities could be a model of humanities for all those whose self-<br />

dignity have been harmed by socially-construed standards or categories. feminist humanities did not add<br />

to the burden of women’s pain by finding the cause of the pain in the women themselves. Nor did it allow<br />

women to stay in a self-deceptive mode by telling them to transcend their surrounding circumstances<br />

in their minds. Instead, feminist humanities chose to uncover in the social context the circumstances of<br />

life that were causing women pain. Thus, women were able to find the power of affirmation to liberate<br />

themselves in this collective effort calling for changes in social order.<br />

In such efforts, the thing that is needed above all is new language. <strong>The</strong> main task of feminist humanities<br />

was an investigation of language necessary to reevaluate oneself, understand relationships and interpret<br />

the world based on one’s own experiences, feelings and thoughts. <strong>The</strong> language forming the rules of<br />

patriarchal life were not appropriate for revealing the problems that women were wrestling with or for<br />

healing the damaged self-identity of women. Oftentimes, the language would even have a suppressive<br />

function. For example, the word ‘women’ does not only refer to the biological sex. It is an aggregation<br />

of meanings forming a series of implicated regulations and relationships controlling women’s lives<br />

overall, from where women should stay, what they should do or not do, who they should interact with<br />

or not interact with, how they should behave. Unless one knows the implications, one cannot be said to<br />

understand the word ‘women’ correctly.<br />

470


<strong>The</strong>se regulations on how women should live have also taken place in the process of daily living.<br />

Comments such as “Women are beautiful” or “A mother’s sacrifice is a noble thing” must have brought<br />

life-assuring joy to some women and some mothers in the beginning. However, now they have become<br />

some sort of regulations and virtues that all women are to uphold as a matter of fact. In this context, they<br />

are no longer joy-giving or life-affirming sayings but normative values that women are forced to uphold.<br />

Now, beauty or noble sacrifice are no longer choices that women can make as principal agents. Women<br />

are no longer agents of this value. Rather, these virtues have now become systems that turn women<br />

into ‘the others,’ objects that can be controlled by the ruling powers. Thus, women feel skepticism and<br />

hopelessness in practicing what must have once brought them joy. Her life is still being praised for its<br />

beauty or sacrifice but her existential agency is being ignored.<br />

In a situation where what women can say and cannot say are defined, to go against that definition is to go<br />

against the rules of the community. Thus, women came to suffer a ‘nameless illness’ in which they felt<br />

trapped in a room without any exits.<br />

How were women able to find their exit from such illness? feminist humanities tries to provide the exit<br />

through the job of deconstructing the self-identity of women that was formed through these normative<br />

customs. This is the job of analyzing and deconstructing the series of regulations that formed the meaning<br />

of ‘women.’ Regulations that are thought to be unbreakable and traditions that are considered essential<br />

to our ethnical identity and praised as being ‘good’ and ‘beautiful’ are merely the products of particular<br />

historical and political practice. It is important that we have the discernment to see that such traditions<br />

are neither inevitable laws of nature or inherent human ways. Anthropological research conducted by<br />

distancing oneself from one’s own culture, using methods such as genealogy research from a feministic<br />

perspective or studying the orders of other cultures are an effective way of promoting such discernment.<br />

3. A Deconstructive Analysis of Self-Identity<br />

One begins to see the normative order that had been suppressing oneself in a relative point of view when<br />

one deconstructs its meaning. This also allows one to bring up questions that had been considered taboo<br />

until now. One is able to talk about problems that had been giving them pain but were hidden until now<br />

as private shame. <strong>The</strong> awareness that one was not able to talk about this problem because one had been<br />

oppressed, that the source of the problem lies not in the personal shortcomings of oneself becomes a<br />

source of strength to talk about problems that one had been burying inside until now because one had<br />

not been able to discover the cause. <strong>The</strong> uncovering of such problems are oftentimes taken as subversive<br />

challenges to society but for those who had been oppressed, they represent a liberating exit. We can<br />

471<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

find a similar situation in the writing of Chung Jin-hong on healing found in the context of religious<br />

communities.<br />

This is no different from discovering the most effective exit to escape the ‘reckless bondage’ of<br />

idiomatic expressions. I feel that a change in language is no different from a change in the world.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore talking in a new language is meeting with a new exit strategy that didn’t exist before, of<br />

revealing one’s pain which isn’t being recognized by the authorities. In actuality, a new language<br />

is not a coincidence. It is the product of selves who had no other choice but to express themselves<br />

in another language. By experiencing carefreeness coming from not holding back from asking<br />

questions, by sharing one’s loneliness by exposing it publicly, by fearlessly confessing that there<br />

are self-oppressive chains within oneself in relations to the religious community which were in<br />

someways self-tormenting, by taking the courage to do so and receiving the consolation that one<br />

could not get from one’s superiors from other ‘outsiders,’ one breathes in a ‘return to self.’ 7<br />

Speaking out about one’s pain against social stigma is not only significant for restoring one’s self-identity.<br />

By expressing in language one’s pain, one begins to let society know that such pain exists. Expressing<br />

one’s pain is the act of letting others know of such pain and this holds significance on a social level. It<br />

is an act of transforming a private emotion into a social event. It is an effort to create a new linguistic<br />

community that can express one’s pain in a meaningful manner. It is, in a way, an effort to bring about a<br />

social change that can alleviate one’s pain. 8<br />

In this way, people who are hurt need a language to talk meaningfully about their own experiences and<br />

to think in a different manner. <strong>The</strong> normative language of the patriarchical world that has ruled the lives<br />

of women was considered sacred as if its meanings held unchanging truths. However, the meanings in a<br />

language are created within the life process of the community that uses the language. <strong>The</strong>y are not given<br />

7 Chung Jin-hong (2012), “What I want to think about in regards to the healing phenomenon.” Philosophy and Reality.<br />

Issue 94, pp. 84-85. <strong>The</strong> point of this article is aligned with the thought behind the practice of women’s liberation. Mr.<br />

Chung writes about how believers who loyally adhered to religious regulations within the a religious system would<br />

suddenly feel religious skepticism and despair. Here, we can see that this is similar to the existential situation of women<br />

placed in an oppressive situation.<br />

8 By criticizing the falsity of single-truth humanities, feminists were able to develop new humanities approaches. Our<br />

society is a democratic society which upholds equality and universal citizenship in principle. However, one can discover<br />

that it is still ruled by a male-centric social order and thought. feminist humanities uncovers and brings to surface the<br />

surrounding events, everyday life styles and common preconceptions our society holds that make this a gender-divided<br />

society. In the process of revealing how many gender-discriminating acts and systems were rationalized and accepted by<br />

our society in the name of tradition and customs, of uncovering the truth that the language and rules applied to women in<br />

the name of ‘morality’ and ‘duty’ were merely practices in a patriarchical and male-centric society, women can experience<br />

healing of their damaged self-identity, coming from seeing oneself as an incapable being, and restoration of their selfdignity.<br />

472


truths reflecting unchanging existences. In this sense, the world of meanings in language is not complete<br />

or fixed. As linguistic philosophers put it, it is a life form in that it is always open to change. Changes to<br />

the life environment is followed by changes in everyday life and changes in linguistic meanings.<br />

<strong>The</strong> meanings in a language are not the minds of the language user or the external substance that the<br />

language refer to. It is created and transformed in the practice of the language community. Based on this<br />

premise, our understanding of self needs to change as well.<br />

Generally, we are used to defining self by linking it to an identity that is maintained unchanged despite<br />

any external changes. However if who I am is not independent from the linguistic context in which it<br />

is spoken, ‘I’ in a changing linguistic context cannot be approached as the unchanging essence of ‘I.’<br />

In particular, it seems impossible to talk about who I am in relation to an unchanging essence in this<br />

modern society where the context of language usage is multi-layered and mixed up. As a simple example,<br />

my identity as a woman and as a humanities scholar is determined in multi-layers in the context of the<br />

patriarchical practice that the members of our society share in and in the context of the democratic practice<br />

that has developed since early modernity. A context of relationship-centered order and a context of<br />

individual-centered order that transcends relationships, my identity already holds an inherent contradiction<br />

because it is created in these two disparate contexts.<br />

As such, feminism does not take the concept of self as an ‘essence’ based upon the foundations of<br />

identity. Instead, it takes the concept of self as a non-unificative or active process taking place within the<br />

boundaries of history, society and culture. That is, feminism sees the individual self as a ‘work in progress’<br />

being processed amidst the contradictions and conflicts that cause the fragmentation of one’s subjecthood.<br />

In feminism, the appropriate concept is an existential self. Who I am can only be told through what I<br />

choose in a particular situation. <strong>The</strong>re is no given essence that makes me, me. As such, ‘finding one’s lost<br />

self’ might be a rhetorical expression but it does not hold an accurate understanding of the self.<br />

Women hold a lot of internalized negative and conflicting concepts about themselves, due to the long<br />

history of women having been peripheral beings. <strong>The</strong> more areas of life I participate in, the more<br />

complicated the relationships I forge become, the more I experience myself as a complex, conflicting<br />

and fragmented being construed of disparate meanings. <strong>The</strong> concept of self in feminism is constructed<br />

in this context. 9 <strong>The</strong> modern understanding of humans was that the fragmented, conflicting, ambiguous<br />

9 It seems the situation that we find ourselves in is a situation in which we must ask and question who we are in a scene<br />

where different contexts of life overlap and clash. In such situation, the humanities of before with its premise that all<br />

humans have a core essence that makes the individual and are a unique, unchanging and adjusted unit does little to help.<br />

473<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

and fickle nature of self were symptoms of the mental illness or weakness of the person. Feminism, on<br />

the other hand, saw this as positive traits of self which helped one be more considerate of oneself and of<br />

others and which led to one forming relations with others by treating them as equals. <strong>The</strong>se were traits<br />

that a flexible self should possess. A flexible self is open to meeting others and allows change to itself in<br />

relationships with others.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ideal of a well-adjusted and unified self seems to have come from imagining a subjectivity who forms<br />

his or her perspective in a place that transcends the circumstances of life and views the world and fellow<br />

humans through this perspective. As discussed above, this is a far cry from a self that struggles with the<br />

despair, sense of loss and anxiety that comes from leading one’s life in the realities of life. Moreover, the<br />

self is a far more complex materialization of a sub-conscious level to be seen as a well-adjusted beliefs<br />

system. In this sense, the traditional concept of self is not an appropriate concept to be used in humanities<br />

healing.<br />

4. Feminist Method of Conscious-Raising<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are several humanities methods for healing people in pain. <strong>The</strong> process of distancing oneself<br />

from the shared beliefs, attitudes and emotions that have already become familiar and examining them<br />

autonomously is a thought process that those who are socially isolated must go through to heal the pain<br />

they have. <strong>The</strong> method for one who asks about the grounds for the rules that oppress oneself to establish<br />

one’s place and to explore until finally reaching an answer that one can accept, this is the method of<br />

philosophical analysis. As mentioned above, the process of uncovering how the regulations and concepts<br />

that oppress oneself is used in one’s society and finding out on whose experiences they are based on<br />

can be helpful not only to those who are socially isolated and hurt but to those who are suffering from<br />

problems of individual aspects. 10<br />

An efficient method of humanities healing could be taken through works of humanities that reflect on<br />

<strong>The</strong> traditional schema that humans are thinking agents and that the most supreme human act is to contemplate the world<br />

doesn’t help, either. Instead, the concept of human as an existence within the process of forming interactive meanings<br />

rising from a mesh of language is more appropriate not only for the socially weak but for the situation that all humans find<br />

themselves in today. In the traditional concept of a self or subjecthood that does not change through time or experience,<br />

the possibility of change over time is denied. Now, subjecthood is understood as itself being a process in change. With<br />

the important role that language and social interactions play in forming the self, one’s position in social relations also<br />

becomes an important factor in forming one’s subjecthood.<br />

10 Individual aspects and social aspects are not sharply divided but rather, interconnected most of the times.<br />

474


human lives but feminism often uses the method of collective dialogue. 11 If we look for this model in<br />

ancient times, we can first consider the Socratic dialogue. His philosophical method was not a rational<br />

contemplation of intuitively understanding the principles that penetrated the world. Instead, Socrates<br />

chose the method of holding conversations in everyday language, a method much more useful for sharing<br />

the worries of life.<br />

Moreover, the Socratic dialogue is collective, not a one-on-one dialogue such as those that usually take<br />

place between a therapist and a patient in healing therapies such as modern psychoanalyses. Socratic<br />

dialogues usually start off their themes with abstract concepts so that the entire group can share the theme.<br />

For example, a dialogue is initiated with formal concepts such as ‘justice’ or ‘love’ which allows for<br />

anyone to talk about their experiences or thoughts. When bringing up experiences that they believe are<br />

related to the theme, the participants in the conversation express their beliefs and react to others expressing<br />

their beliefs. This is how a collective dialogue is carried out. This process not only reveals the set of beliefs<br />

that the participants each hold but also lets them realize by listening to the beliefs of others that their own<br />

beliefs are only one part of a bigger whole. Participants may come to see the contradictions in the beliefs<br />

that they had once been so sure of. Furthermore, they might discover inherent contradictions in shared<br />

beliefs that are considered common sense. Through this process, by participating in the rearrangement of<br />

the relations between beliefs, humans can, although tentatively, reach a completely new conclusion. <strong>The</strong><br />

Socratic dialogue plays the midwife in such intellectual process.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Socratic dialogue is an example of open exploration through which modern humans suffering from<br />

disorders deriving from conceptual confusion can find answers to questions such as how they should live,<br />

who they are and what they want. <strong>The</strong> Socratic dialogue is not a monologue in which one person does all<br />

the questioning and answering. <strong>The</strong> important thing to remember is that this dialogue should be conducted<br />

among those from different backgrounds who share an interest in the same theme.<br />

Despite these advantages, the Socratic dialogue has certain limits as a method of sharing and resolving<br />

actual problems of life because it is a method of argumentation used to distinguish what is right or wrong.<br />

Many problems of life are of a nature that cannot be solved by distinguishing what is right or wrong. In<br />

fact a number of problems do not have anything to do with right or wrong in the first place. If we take into<br />

11 Most of the classics read as humanities traditions were completed in a patriarchical culture and do not cover the problems<br />

that women want to ask. In many cases, they contain prejudices against women. That is why feminist humanities relies<br />

not only on these classics but on various other types of resource materials on women’s lives to uncover women’s stories<br />

that were not included in the classics and buried in history.<br />

475<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

consideration the fact that our awareness is dependent on the language we use, the sort of problems of life<br />

that could be solved by sorting out what is right or wrong are the simpler problems.<br />

Feminist humanities recognized the limits of a dialogue conducted in the form of a courtroom debate<br />

distinguishing what is right and wrong. Instead, it uses a method of conscious-raising through collective<br />

dialogue. Here, also, participants express their thoughts on the theme. However, the dialogue is centered<br />

on the participants’ stories of their experiences and cases that they had seen in relation to or in association<br />

with the theme of the dialogue. That is, this is a form of collective conversation in which participants<br />

feel free to express their emotions, moods and feelings regardless of the problem of what’s wrong and<br />

what’s right. Moreover, this collective dialogue provides a stage for self-narration in which participants<br />

can reveal who they are in front of others. A fragmented, ambiguous and fickle subjecthood is reborn as<br />

a story through the process of self-narration in front of others. In this regard, it becomes a process of self-<br />

creation.<br />

Conclusion<br />

This paper began with the position of understanding the limits of humanities as a means to discover the<br />

answer to the questions, ‘Who am I’ and ‘How should I live’ when believing that there is one correct<br />

answer. We can verify that this was not a valid position for everyone just by looking back on the history<br />

of humanities. To be accurate, this was humanities as practiced by those in authoritative positions, subject<br />

who possessed the necessary conditions to represent humanities understanding. As such, it is somewhat<br />

inadequate for shedding light on and exploring problems of life for those who were not accepted as<br />

representative subjectivity of humanities. From the start, the objective of traditional humanities was<br />

never to be a humanities in which those in the peripheries and those in pain can participate and form their<br />

subjecthood. <strong>The</strong>refore, one can hardly expect this humanities to give healing and caring for the painful<br />

suffering of the socially vulnerable who are unable to claim representative positions.<br />

This paper emphasizes that humanities healing for the socially weak, those who are most vulnerable and<br />

inevitably hurt, cannot be found in a paradigm seeking one great, representative truth. Instead, it must be<br />

found in a paradigm that allows for a multiple of humanities understanding. Only a paradigm open to the<br />

possibility of multiple understandings can listen attentively to the life stories experienced from various<br />

positions of society and allow these peripheral participants to voice their own words.<br />

A humanities paradigm that allows for multiple subjectivities and multiple understandings uses<br />

conversation as an important method of humanities exploration. Conversation is where different agents<br />

meet because of the undeniable fact that they live in the same community. When we all live in the same<br />

476


community, our different positions and meanings cannot exist like isolated islands, existing alongside one<br />

another but never interacting. <strong>The</strong>y are now aware that their life story only tells part of the truth and are<br />

situation-based and limited. When agents meet with such awareness, they meet to go beyond their partial<br />

perspectives and communicate with others. How these partial awareness will collide and clash, how they<br />

will be interconnected and adjusted or compromised is not decided beforehand. No one has the authority<br />

to decide what the final answer is. 12<br />

This paper presents such humanities dialogue and healing methods based on the experience of feminism<br />

having applied them to heal the self-identity of women who were in pain. Healing cannot be achieved<br />

merely by the internal and spiritual recovery of the individual. This might be a necessary condition but<br />

not a sufficient condition. An internal and spiritual recovery might restore one’s self-esteem and give one<br />

the strength to carry on but as long as the social order that had excluded the individual in the first place<br />

continues to exist unchanged, the individual will return to the same social order as the same ‘loser’ and<br />

‘disqualified person.’<br />

In the restoration of a damaged self for those who were socially excluded or isolated, as in the case of<br />

feminist humanities, one needs not only to examine oneself but to garner the strength to publicly express<br />

one’s pain. Only then could one start cracking at the social and cultural regulations and orders that<br />

excluded and pained one and begin to change them. <strong>Humanities</strong> healing can only be completed when<br />

accompanied by social changes.<br />

12 Only by acknowledging the practical circumstances of today’s life that is creating a spirit of deconstructive humanities<br />

and which differ greatly from the past, can we acquire an accurate understanding of the illness that these circumstances<br />

are producing. <strong>The</strong> same goes for dealing with these illness and healing people from them. When the significance of an<br />

illness is wrongly construed, the prescription based upon such inaccurate diagnosis would cause more harm than good.<br />

This is because it would be adding yet another factor of confusion to the formula. Only when we accurately understand<br />

the context in which the illness is being produced, can we look for ways to heal or treat it.<br />

477<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Emotions and <strong>Humanities</strong> Healing: <strong>The</strong> Greek Philosophers and<br />

the Stoics’ Understanding of Emotions<br />

Wooryong Park<br />

Sogang University<br />

I. Preface 1<br />

When reviewing the healing of the humanities of modern man’s pain and difficulties, one can first<br />

consider the healing of emotions or sentiments. Generally, the modern man experiences anger, a sense<br />

of deprivation, dejection, isolation and despair, which are all emotional states. In order to resolve such<br />

emotional pain, one must start by better understanding such emotions.<br />

Since ancient times, emotions have been regarded as something negative in the West. Academic studies on<br />

emotions have been conducted for a long time in the West, and one of the rhetorics commonly used since<br />

ancient days is “emotions are the slaves to reason.” 2 This example shows how human emotions have been<br />

regarded since the early stages of history as something inferior and negative compared to reason. In fact,<br />

early interest in emotions occurred as by-results in the process of philosophers discussing reason. In this<br />

process, emotions were considered a threat to reason and with the potential of endangering philosophy<br />

and philosophers. 3<br />

Such comparisons became the direct cause of the birth of two philosophical perspectives on emotions.<br />

First, it led to the view that emotions are inferior to reason. That is, there was a thinking that emotions<br />

1 <strong>The</strong> introduction was written based on the author’s work “<strong>The</strong> Intellectual Tradition of Understanding Emotions in the West,”<br />

Seoyangsaron 102 (2009), pp. 321-57.<br />

2 One of the most enduring metaphors of reason and emotion has been the metaphor of master and slave, with the wisdom of<br />

reason firmly in control and the dangerous impulses of emotion safely suppressed, channeled, or (ideally) in harmony with<br />

reason. Robert C. Solomon, “<strong>The</strong> Philosophy of emotions,” in Handbook of Emotions, Third Edition. Michael Lewis et al eds.<br />

(New York: Guilford Press, 2008), p. 3.<br />

3 Ibid.<br />

478


were more primitive, less intelligent and more dangerous than reason and had to be controlled by reason.<br />

Second, and more importantly, humans came to accept the dichotomy of reason-emotion as something<br />

natural in our minds. That is, reason and emotions existed as two distinct systems in nature and were<br />

conflicting and mutually hostile forces found within the human soul. 4<br />

Even philosophers who tried to unite reason and emotions and integrate one into another constantly<br />

claimed the two were different and that reason was superior. This tradition begins with Plato. Plato saw<br />

the human soul as comprising of three parts or functions reason, desires and will but considered it ideal<br />

for reason to rule the soul entirely. 5 Such attitude since ancient days of dividing the human into reason and<br />

emotions became a predominant or staple concept in the intellectual tradition of the West and continued<br />

into the modern era. One modern philosopher who inherited such tendency was Rene Descartes.<br />

<strong>The</strong> first scholar to purposefully study emotions as a discipline was the American philosopher and<br />

psychologist William James. In an 1884 edition of Mind, a late 19th century philosophy journal, he<br />

published an article titled, “What is an emotion?” This article was instrumental in drawing the public’s<br />

attention to the subject of emotions. In this article, James defined emotion as the “physiological response<br />

that always comes in the aftermath of a feeling.” 6 This definition indicates that even into the 19 th century,<br />

emotions were considered a phenomenon in which the physiological aspect was more dominant.<br />

However, such understanding of emotions presents a considerable problem when keeping modern<br />

humanities healing in mind. If emotions are merely a physiological response and have no cognitive or<br />

reflective elements, there is no possibility of emotional healing within humanities healing. <strong>The</strong>re does<br />

exist in the intellectual traditions of the West, a tradition of viewing emotion not just as a physiological<br />

response but a phenomenon with a cognitive element. This tradition continues from Plato and Aristotle,<br />

continuing through the Stoics, passed on by Spinoza and David Hume and reaching onto Freud in the 19 th<br />

century. 7<br />

This paper aims to present, based on such understanding of emotions, the perspective that emotions have<br />

a cognitive element and that this could be a crucial method in the healing of emotions. First, it will go<br />

4 Ibid.<br />

5 Simo Knuuttila, Emotions in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 2004), p. 7.<br />

6 Solomon, What Is an Emotion?: Classic and Contemporary Readings, <strong>2nd</strong> edn. (New York : Oxford University Press, 2003),<br />

p. 1.<br />

7 <strong>The</strong> author has anthologized Western traditions that view emotions favorably in the above-mentioned “<strong>The</strong> Intellectual Tradition<br />

of Understanding Emotions in the West,” (2009).<br />

479<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

over concepts of emotions by Plato and by Aristotle and verify the contents seeking a cognitive element.<br />

Next, it will compare the methods by the Epicureans and by the Stoics of getting rid of emotional desires.<br />

Finally, it will point to the legacy of the Stoics’ therapy of emotions as found in religion, philosophy and<br />

psychological treatments.<br />

II. A New Understanding of the Concept of Emotions in Ancient Greece: Plato and Aristotle<br />

1. Plato<br />

A philosophical analysis of emotions was first introduced by Plato (427-347 B.C.) and further developed<br />

by Aristotle (384-322 B.C.). Plato’s <strong>The</strong> Republic is perhaps the first methodical explanation ever given<br />

on the state of human emotions. In <strong>The</strong> Republic, while discussing the ideal state and the good human life,<br />

Plato divides the human soul into three parts reason, spirit and appetite. 8 <strong>The</strong> reason loves knowledge and<br />

wisdom. <strong>The</strong> appetite pursues immediate physical pleasures while avoiding pain. <strong>The</strong> spirit in the middle<br />

is where emotions related self-confidence and self-assurance are located. Plato did not think that these<br />

three parts would achieve wholesome harmony on their own. On the contrary, he considered it natural that<br />

there would be frequent conflict among the parts. 9<br />

In his earlier dialogues, Plato seemed to regard all desires and emotions outside reason as arising from the<br />

body. This is particularly marked in Phaedo, where he reflects upon the significance of death and the fate<br />

of the human soul. <strong>The</strong> dichotomy of soul-body divides the immortal and rational function of the soul and<br />

the ephemeral and irrational function of the human body. 10 Plato does not see any positive element in the<br />

desires and passions of the body. This is an attitude indicative of Plato’s early asceticism and this has led<br />

to Plato being perceived as a philosopher whose objective was to transcend desire and passion as much as<br />

possible. 11<br />

However, in <strong>The</strong> Republic and other dialogues during the middle of his life, Plato sees desire and emotion<br />

as movements of the soul. Plato’s attitude towards desire and emotions in these writings differ slightly<br />

from that found in his earlier work of Phaedo. 12 <strong>The</strong> area of desire includes fundamental biological desires<br />

8 Plato, Republic, 4.435-441c: 9.580d-583a, Knuuttila, Emotions, p. 7<br />

9 Ibid.<br />

10 Plato, Phaedo 66b-e, Knuuttila, Emotions in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy, p. 7.<br />

11 Plato, Phaedo, 66e67a, in M.C Nussbaum, <strong>The</strong> Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy<br />

(Cambridge, 1986), pp. 151~152; A. W, Price, Mental Conflict (London, 1995), pp. 36-40.<br />

12 Knuuttila, Emotions, p. 7.<br />

480


and impulses and these mechanically avoid pain and seek immediate pleasure. In this perspective, it is<br />

similar to the instincts of animals. A human driven by animal instincts is pitched to and fro by the impulses<br />

rising from changes to his body and his surroundings. 13<br />

Nevertheless, while emphasizing the difference between the rational and the irrational, Plato did not<br />

consider desire and emotion to be irrational in that he considered them to be completely void of any<br />

cognitive elements. 14 Plato saw these as having ways to express themselves and considered it possible to<br />

interpret them as having an evaluative and balanced attitude. Plato saw sexual lust, thirst and hunger as<br />

the strongest human desires but didn’t consider such animal instincts were all there was to the function of<br />

human desire. 15 Although, Plato does emphasize the differences between the rational side and the irrational<br />

side, he didn’t think that the carnal and sensual side of humans was void of any reason in the sense that it<br />

was non-cognitive. 16 <strong>The</strong>se desires had their own way of expressing themselves and therefore their actions<br />

could be seen as including attitudes of evaluative statements.<br />

As such, Plato saw that an aspect of cognitive function, as well as the instinctive aspect, affected human<br />

desires. Desires recognize whether the fulfillment of that instinct brings comfort or discomfort, and have<br />

the ability to evaluate the situation based on the predictions of pleasure or pain which would follow that<br />

fulfillment. 17 <strong>The</strong> desire for wealth, in particular, belongs more to the cognitive side. 18<br />

Courage is the part of the human soul in which a proactive and self-evaluative cognitive element can be<br />

found as a primary element. <strong>The</strong> act of courage share a link in physiological change with the act of desire.<br />

Courage is naturally given the position of serving reason. 19 Courage can help the efforts of reason, based<br />

on the foundations of acknowledgement, honor and self-esteem, to acquire knowledge and to align the<br />

essence of human existence with the true form of human’s place in the universe. In this perspective, Plato<br />

treats the emotional response of courage as something cognitive. 20 Courage rising in a soul without order<br />

rears exaggerated belligerence and bluff. 21 However, the emotional response of courage is based on value<br />

appraisal, which is closer to an evaluation based on reason rather than on desire.<br />

13 Plato, Republic 4.439b~d; 9.580d~581a, 586a~c., in Knuuttila, Emotions, pp. 7-8.<br />

14 Knuuttila, Emotions, p. 9.<br />

15 Plato, Republic. 4.437d; 9.580e.<br />

16 Knuuttila, Emotions, p. 9.<br />

17 Plato, Republic. , 4.442a; 9.583e-584c.<br />

18 Ibid, 9.581a.<br />

19 Ibid, 4.440a-441a.<br />

20 Knuuttila, Emotions, p. 8.<br />

21 Plato, Republic, 4.441c-e; 9.581a-b; 586c-d.<br />

481<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

W. W. Fortenbaugh argues that after writing <strong>The</strong> Republic, Plato changed his thoughts on emotions. 22<br />

This change occurred when Plato realized through philosophical debates at the Academy, that certain<br />

parts of the moral and political issues dealt with in <strong>The</strong> Republic had given a flawed analysis of emotional<br />

responses. 23 Fortenbaugh states that Plato’s dividing of the human soul into three parts is especially<br />

problematic when connecting emotions with psychology. Plato himself, to a certain extent, shows signs<br />

of awareness that there were limits to using the three-part model as a foundation to categorize emotions. 24<br />

In <strong>The</strong> Republic(4.443d), Plato implies that there could be more than just three parts. When discussing<br />

the distress that poetry can invoke, as well as emotion such as sorrow, pity and joy, Plato talks about<br />

distinguishing the rational side and the irrational side. 25 He refers to the latter as having an intricate and<br />

complex nature. 26 Thus, when desire is connected to physical impulses such as hunger, thirst and sexual<br />

lust, which are hard to be accepted as reason, this is expanded into the area of cognitive evaluation as well.<br />

Fortenbaugh points out that Plato began to see emotions as a special dimension of cognitive process. 27<br />

Moreover, he claims that Plato attempts to explain the difference between emotional response and rational<br />

reflection as these two being two forms of cognitive activities. That is why Plato clearly differentiates<br />

emotions from physical senses and basic impulses. Thus, cognitive process are divided in calculation and<br />

reflection on one parter and good or painful feelings on the other. According to Fortenbaugh’s claims, after<br />

<strong>The</strong> Republic, Plato’s attitude towards emotions shifted towards focusing on the cognitive aspect once he<br />

accepted the positive side of emotions. 28<br />

22 poetics, politics and ethics (London: Gerald Duckworth, 1975, 2008), pp. 9-12, 23-25, 31-33.<br />

23 Knuuttila, Emotions, p. 14.<br />

24 Ibid., p. 12.<br />

25 Knuuttila, Emotions, p. 5. Recent exemplary writings discussing the human emotions has portrayed in ancient Greek poetry<br />

and tragedies are as follows: D. L. Cairns, <strong>The</strong> Psychology and Ethics of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greek Literature<br />

(Oxford: Carendon Press, 1993); B. Willams, Shame and Necessity (Berkeley, LA., and London, University of California<br />

Press, 1993); M.W. Blundell, Helping Friends and Harming Enemies: A Study in Sophocles and Greek Ethics(Cambridge:<br />

Cambridge University Press, 1989).<br />

26 Plato, Republic, 10.603d-604b in A. W. Price, Mental Conflict (London: Routledge, 1995), pp. 68-9.<br />

27 Knuuttila, Emotions, pp.14~15.<br />

28 Such change of perspective by Plato will be covered more in detail in the next part.<br />

482


2. Aristotle<br />

It is clear that Aristotle took from Plato the idea of compositional analysis of emotions. However, the<br />

two philosophers hold different views on emotions. 29 Aristotle follows Plato in dividing the human<br />

soul into rational and irrational parts but he does not completely separate the two. He avoids making a<br />

sharp distinction between the rational, or cognitive, elements of emotions and the irrational, or physical,<br />

elements. This is because, Aristotle acknowledged, this being a very complex-dimensioned problem,<br />

that emotions could be both irrational and rational. Also, Aristotle understood the two parts of reason and<br />

emotion inevitably being united as one.<br />

In addition, Aristotle did not see the human being as a completely rational being, acknowledging that there<br />

was an ‘emotional element’ that could ever be erased or ignored in human nature. That is why Aristotle<br />

thought that while a human completely succumbing to desire fell to the level of an animal, it was also<br />

foolish and irrational to deny one’s passion and live as an ascetic, as this was denying human nature. 30<br />

Aristotle presents detailed analyses on various emotions in Rhetoric. He differentiates four fundamental<br />

elements constituting emotions - cognition, psychic affect, bodily affect, and behavioral suggestion or<br />

impulse. One marked characteristic of Aristotle’s approach to emotions is his interest in emotions as<br />

pleasurable or non-pleasurable methods of becoming aware of oneself in various situations. 31<br />

Aristotle, in Ethics and Politics, states that humans have a rational and social nature and accordingly<br />

a great human life naturally includes developing rational skills and participating in various forms of<br />

social activities. 32 He believed that there existed various emotions related to issues discussed in social<br />

systems, actual life and actual philosophy and that there was value in analysing the functions providing<br />

the cognitive content and motive of emotions. 33 A socially learned emotional paradigm plays an important<br />

role in Aristotle’s theory of ethical education. That is, the crucial question is how to train and teach young<br />

people to participate in the emotional forms of culture in the direction of fostering habits of feelings and<br />

emotions that contribute to a good life. 34<br />

29 Knuuttila, Emotions, p. 24.<br />

30 Marvin Perry, An Intellectual History of Modern Europe (Boston, 1993), p. 20.<br />

31 Knuuttila, Emotions, p. 5.<br />

32 Aristotle, Ethica Nicomachea, ed. I. Bywater, OCT(Oxford: Carendon Press, 1988), 1.7-9, 2.1-5.<br />

33 Ibid., 2.6-8.<br />

34 Knuuttila, Emotions, p. 25.<br />

483<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Aristotle defined emotion as “the things on account of which the ones altered differ with respect to their<br />

judgments, and are accompanied by pleasure and pain: such are anger, pity, fear, and all similar emotions<br />

and their contraries.” 35 In particular, Aristotle shows deep interest in how a human undergoing a particular<br />

experience would, through some process of conscious thinking, reach a pleasurable or non-pleasurable<br />

emotion.<br />

This is why Aristotle avoids treating emotion as an irrational or uncontrollable response to a situation.<br />

We might not be able to justify our emotions at times but just as often as not, we indeed can justify them.<br />

Aristotle develops this perspective in Nicomachean Ethics. In this writing, he perceives virtue (such as<br />

courage or generosity) to be a problem of feeling the right thing. <strong>The</strong>refore, a courageous person is not<br />

immune to fear in a dangerous situation but nor does he or she let fear take over him or her. Aristotle<br />

claims that we can create our emotions through education and habit.<br />

According to Aristotle’s Rhetorics, the characteristics of many emotions show a strong reaction to the<br />

behavior of others. Aristotle found anger interesting because he saw it as a moral force and a natural<br />

response to being attacked, something that was able to be developed and stirred by reason and rhetoric.<br />

Aristotle’s analysis of anger shows his complex perspective on emotions. <strong>The</strong> element that he considers<br />

crucial when analyzing anger is the concept of slight. A slight, which can be taken as a sign of scorn, spite<br />

or insolence, is the main factor that makes a person feel anger.<br />

Aristotle thought that the desire for revenge took center in a person’s emotions when the person<br />

underwent a process of imagination stimulated by the fact that he or she was slighted. Aristotle’s concept<br />

of emotions meant that he saw the behavioral element of revenge as being central to the emotion of anger.<br />

As such, Aristotle’s analysis of anger is complex in that it includes an emphasis on its cognitive element,<br />

a reflection of its concrete social context, its tendency to express itself in action and its cognition of a<br />

physical stimulus. 36<br />

Anger is one of the most marked virtues Aristotle talks about in his Nicomachean Ethics. In Nicomachean<br />

Ethics, Aristotle writes in detail about what situation justifies anger and what degree or intensity of anger<br />

is justifiable. He saw forgiveness as a virtue but made it clear that this was so only in certain situations.<br />

He claimed that not feeling anger in a situation where one should feel anger was not a virtue but a vice<br />

instead. Aristotle also talked in length about fear when explaining about courage. Aristotle attempted such<br />

35 Aristotle, Rhetoric 1378e20-1380a4, in Robert C. Solomon, What Is an Emotion? (<strong>2nd</strong> ed.) (New York: Oxford University<br />

Press, 2003). p. 6.<br />

36 Knuuttila, Emotions, p. 5.<br />

484


a detailed analysis of the essence of emotions because he saw them as being an important part of analysing<br />

ethics. 37<br />

According to Aristotle, humans feel pleasure because they can recognize it. 38 Joy comes from cognition,<br />

so remembering or expecting something is enough to make one feel pleasure. 39 Through such analysis,<br />

Aristotle draws the conclusion and emotions are an essential element to living a good life. Aristotle said<br />

that when humans recognize something, they also recognize the fact that they are having a recognization. 40<br />

That is, if pleasure as a joy comes in a cognitive form, it must always occur on a conscious level. 41<br />

Aristotle’s analysis is important in that it analyzed emotions as evaluations. 42 If someone smiled in a<br />

friendly manner at you, you would feel a warm feeling towards that person. This, in Aristotle’s view, is<br />

because you evaluated the smile as a sign of affection. A emotion is an evaluation of a situation from the<br />

perspective of the importance that it takes in our interest. With Aristotle’s concept of emotions, evaluation,<br />

or appraisal, came to be understood as being crucial in understanding emotions.<br />

Aristotle’s view of seeing emotions as evaluations was adopted into modern psychology by Magda<br />

Arnold and J. A. Gasson in the 20th century. <strong>The</strong>y claimed that in all emotions, knowledge, evaluation and<br />

judgment came first. 43<br />

37 Ibid.<br />

38 Aristotle, Rhetoric, 1370a27-8 in Knuuttila, Emotions, p. 29.<br />

39 Ibid., 1370a30-1.<br />

40 Aristotle, Ethica Nicomachea, 9.9. 1170a29-32.<br />

41 Knuuttila, Emotions, p. 30.<br />

42 Keith Oatley, Emotions (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004), p. 42.<br />

43 M. B. Arnold and J. A. Gasson, “Feelings and emotions as dynamic factors in personality integration,” in M. B. Arnold and J.<br />

A. Gasson eds., <strong>The</strong> Human person (New York: Ronald, 1954), p. 215.<br />

485<br />

Session 4


either mentally or physically. <strong>The</strong> only way to reach this stage as taught by Epicureans was something<br />

similar to Aristotle’s virtue of temperance. For Epicureans, it was important to acquire a balanced state<br />

of satisfaction to overcome dissatisfaction in the process of life. <strong>The</strong>refore, the only virtue in the eyes<br />

of the Epicureans was a prudent discernment deciding and evaluating the maximization of pleasure and<br />

minimization of pain among various possible pleasures. 48<br />

In this context, Epicurianism is a philosophy seeking the healing of pain, and above all, peace of mind.<br />

Compared to the logical reasoning of Plato and Aristotle, it seeks these objectives through more exoteric<br />

and practical methods. Ultimately, the Epicureans’ purpose is to free the human being from all sources of<br />

pain in the soul. 49<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> Stoics 50<br />

<strong>The</strong> Stoics had an even larger influence than the Epicureans. <strong>The</strong> Stoic way of thinking crossed from<br />

Greece To Rome and lasted about 600 years. <strong>The</strong>ir Principal Greek philosopher was Chrysippus. Famous<br />

Roman Stoics include Seneca, playwright and millionaire, Epictetus, who had been a slave, as well as<br />

Marcus Aurelius the emperor. Stoics took in and expanded on many teachings of Plato and Aristotle.<br />

However, the Stoic explanation of emotions didn’t garner as much attention as that of Aristotle because<br />

they included the discussions on emotions as part of a bigger discussion on ethics. 51 Not only did they<br />

think emotions was a complex state that included cognition, impulse and behavior, they believed that the<br />

cognitive process leading to emotions was morally destructive. 52 But whereas Aristotle took emotion to be<br />

essential to the good life, the Stoics analyzed emotions as a conceptual error, conducive to misery. 53<br />

Two Stoic philosophers in particular, Seneca and Chrysippus, were instrumental in developing a more<br />

advanced cognitive theory of emotions some 2,000 years ago. Emotions, in their view, were judgments on<br />

a human’s position in the world. 54 For the Stoics, emotion was “a cognitively -induced impulse to act or<br />

48 Kim Yang-soon, “Humanism in the Ancient Greece and Rome”, p. 24.<br />

49 Ibid.<br />

50 Cicero’s ‘Methodical Interpretation of the Stoics’ <strong>The</strong>rapy of the Emotions’ which should be included in this chapter<br />

is excluded due to limits of presentation time and paper. <strong>The</strong> author plans to include this theme when writing a formal<br />

dissertation.<br />

51 Lyons, “<strong>The</strong> Philosophy of Cognition and Emotion”, in Hand book of Cognition and Emotion, ed. by Tim Dalgleish and Mick<br />

Power (New York and Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1999), p. 24.<br />

52 Ibid.<br />

53 Solomon, “<strong>The</strong> Philosophy of Emotions”, p. 5.<br />

54 Ibid.<br />

487<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

plan for emergency action, caused by the subject making a judgement or forming a belief about the current<br />

state of affairs and what one should do about it.” 55 Thus, fear was an impulse to run away or fight one’s<br />

way out of trouble, resulting from the subject’s negative judgment that he/she was caught in a dangerous<br />

situation and must do something about it, quickly. 56<br />

Seneca, a prominent figure among Roman Stoics, interpreted anger from a cognitive aspect as well. 57 For<br />

Seneca, the impulse of violence arose from recognizing an injury or a slight. As Aristotle had done so,<br />

even if emotions were meant to be controlled by reason, the stimulus of emotion itself occurred through<br />

reason. 58 Seneca was in accordance with Aristotle when writing that anger was an impulse of revenge in<br />

face of a slight and seeing it as a motivation for action.<br />

However, Seneca distinguished the desire of revenge in face of a slight with a sadistic aggression, when<br />

cruel people feel pleasure by giving pain to others. 59 Seneca thought that people easily resort to violence<br />

as a response because of their strong pride and that people’s feelings were hurt easily because of this pride.<br />

Seneca also showed interest in the efforts to suppress the impulse of revenge even in the midst of anger.<br />

He believed that such efforts were the most reliable way of preventing anger from turning into violence. 60<br />

Like the Epicureans, the Stoics thought that emotions were to be extirpated. Like them, they thought that<br />

the keys to these operations were desires, but at this point two schools differed. Whereas the Epicureans<br />

worked by diverting attention from the illusory and unnecessary, the Stoics thought that to free oneself<br />

from emotions, one must free oneself from most kinds of desires. 61<br />

Marcus Aurelius thought passions were not good, but he was not scathing about them. He recognized that<br />

“passion’s revulsion from reason at least seems to bring with it a certain discomfort, and a half-felt sense<br />

55 Lyons, “<strong>The</strong> Philosophy of Cognition and Emotions”, p. 24.<br />

56 Ibid.<br />

57 One of the most discussed writing during the cognitive-affective debate of the 1980s was Hans Toch’s article on Seneca’s<br />

perspective on anger and violence, published in a US psychology journal. Toch had been studying anger and its suppression for<br />

a long time and offer this short but concise explanation on Seneca’s approach to anger as part of the cognitive-affective debate.<br />

(H. Toch, Violent Men, Chicago, 1969: “<strong>The</strong> management of hostile aggression: Seneca as applied social psychologist”,<br />

American Philosophy of Emotions 38, pp.1022~1025.<br />

58 Solomon, “<strong>The</strong> Philosophy of Emotions”, p. 6.<br />

59 Ibid.<br />

60 Lazarus, “<strong>The</strong> Cognition-Emotion Debate: a bit of history,” in Hand book of Cognition and Emotion, ed. by Tim Dalgleish and<br />

Mick Power (New York and Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1999), p. 6.<br />

61 P. Jones, An Intelligent person’s guide to the classics (London: Duckworth, 1999); M.C. Nussbaum, <strong>The</strong> therapy of desire:<br />

<strong>The</strong>ory and practice in Hellenistic ethics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994); R. Sorabji, Emotion and peace of<br />

mind: From Stoic agitation to Christian temptation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).<br />

488


of constraint”. 62 <strong>The</strong> real trouble came with desires: too much wanting of money because it feels as if we<br />

deserve it, the assertion of power because we know the other person is wrong, the push towards sexual<br />

gratification because it feels compelling. Desires have their own sense of rightness about them. 63<br />

<strong>The</strong> first Roman Stoic philosopher to give a proper explanation of cognitive emotions was Chrysippus. He<br />

saw emotions as having two movements. First, like Charles Darwin’s snake-escape reflex, is involuntary.<br />

Chrysippus called it a first movement. Darwin’s reflex had a physical component - jumping backwards<br />

- but no doubt also a mental component - fear. You will have experienced such mental first movements<br />

yourself: perhaps alone in the house, you hear a strange noise. You startle and feel suddenly afraid or on<br />

your guard. second movements are more considered. <strong>The</strong>y are of what one might do about the agitation<br />

of the first movement. Chrysippus argued that the second movements were the real emotions. With them<br />

one can decide what is truly important. For the Stoics, no externals are important. By extirpating wrong<br />

desires, one can extirpate the second movements, in which we consent and translate urges into deliberate<br />

action. 64<br />

In the Stoics’ view, emotions depended on how we evaluated a situation. when we evaluate them as<br />

deriving from things that are worthless, we can free of envy, anger, disappointment. One should therefore<br />

indifferent to them. If one evaluates them properly, they empty and ephemeral in comparison with matters<br />

that are permanent and worthy. <strong>The</strong> Stoics thought the ability to reason derives from one’s soul, which<br />

they thought tobe divine. An emotion makes a certain desire, a certain course of action, urgent. <strong>The</strong> issue<br />

is to distinguish the important from the merely urgent, and to give one’s assent to those second movements<br />

that are important.<br />

So what is permanent and worthy of desire? <strong>The</strong> Stoic answer is that only character, in its virtue,<br />

rationality, and kindness. 65<br />

IV. <strong>The</strong> Influence of Stoics<br />

1. Religion<br />

Although much of the argument about reaching non-attached states of mind is distinctive to the Stoics, the<br />

62 Marcus Aurelius(c. 173), Mediations,(M. Staniforth, trans.), (London: Penguin), 47 in Oatley, Emotions, pp. 47-8.<br />

63 Oatley, Emotions, p. 48.<br />

64 Ibid., p. 48.<br />

65 Ibid., p. 49.<br />

489<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

attitude that a Stoic achieves came close to Buddhism, 66 In Buddhism, one realizes that the notion of a self<br />

who is successful, or accomplished, or indeed has any fixity in time, is an illusion. As with Stoicism, there<br />

are practices and exercises to achieve a certain frame of mind. In this frame, it’s not that emotions don’t<br />

happen. It is rather that one observes them and lets them pass, rather than being caught up in their vortices.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Stoics’s idea was that we should cultivate virtue - be good people in the world - and after that,<br />

everything else fits into place. <strong>The</strong> idea has been assiduously adhered to by the three influential<br />

monotheistic religious practices: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. For example, if we love God, all else<br />

follows. Lesser matters can be evaluated as lesser.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was a wide-spread tendency among early Christians to view that the bad emotions, which the<br />

ancient Stoics strove to extirpate, became sins. 67 Evagrius Ponticus nominated eight bad thoughts which<br />

were like Chry- sippus’ first movements: thoughts of gluttony, fornication, avarice, distress, anger,<br />

depression, vanity, and pride.<br />

Later the Roman Catholic church settled on a number of sins that was more resonant that eight. the<br />

number of deadly sins became seven: gluttony, lust, avarice, envy, anger, sloth, and pride. all are emotions,<br />

or have an emotional quality. <strong>The</strong> danger and the sin occur, according to church teaching, when one<br />

indulges them with full consent, in what Chrysippus would regard as the second movement of thinking<br />

how to act. 68<br />

2. Spinoza<br />

Twelve centuries after the breakup of the Roman Empire lived two great rationalist philosophers: Rene<br />

Descartes and Baruch Spinoza. Both wrote books about emotions. Descartes, in his book Passions of the<br />

Soul, analyzed emotions in a way that would lay foundations for scientific analyses of the brain. Spinoza,<br />

in his book <strong>The</strong> Ethics, 69 analyzed them principally in order that we, his readers, could understand their<br />

meaning and our place in the universe.<br />

66 Ibid., p. 50.<br />

67 Refer to the following work for detailed explanation on this alteration. R. Sorabji, Emotion and peace of mind.: From Stoic<br />

agitation to Christian temptation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).<br />

68 Oatley, Emotions, p. 51.<br />

69 B. Spinoza, On the Improvement of the Understanding, the Ethics, and Correspondence (R. H. M. Elwes, Trans.) (New York<br />

Dover, Modern edition 1955).<br />

490


Spinoza recognized in emotions some of the same paradoxes as had the ancient Stoics. He saw people<br />

trying to control their emotions, but in doing so making themselves only more subject to them. His most<br />

striking chapter heading was “On human bondage.” To escape this bondage, one must understand that<br />

the universe is an expression of the mind of God, so each one of us is part of that expression. Rather than<br />

each of us being a separate speck who might bounce off other specks in the vast universe, we are part of<br />

it, more like wrinkles in a giant cloth. As we realize this, we start to see our mistake in thinking that we<br />

are prime movers in what happens, struggling to control things, and getting frustrated and angry when our<br />

desires are not met.<br />

If we understand the world the way as it is, then we have what Spinoza called active emotions, based on<br />

love for the world as it is, and on love for others. If we struggle against it, we have what Spinoza called<br />

passive emotions, thinking that our desires ought to be fulfilled. We then are caught up in bitterness, envy,<br />

resentment, based on confused ideas. 70 Here, for instance, are two of Spinoza’s definitions. For example,<br />

Spinoza offered the following two definitions:<br />

Definition 7. Hatred is pain accompanied by the idea of an external cause. 71<br />

Definition 23. Envy is hatred, in so far as it induces a man to be pained by another’s good fortune, and to<br />

rejoice in another’s evil fortune. 72<br />

When Spinoza points to the idea of an external cause of hatred, his intends us to see ourselves caught up<br />

not in asserting our freedom, which he says is a confused idea, but in bondage. He invites us to re-evaluate<br />

the idea. his radical twist on the idea of emotions as evaluations is that by accepting them, we can start to<br />

be of the bondage in which they hold us. For Spinoza, he intriguing idea is that to be free of the control<br />

of emotions over us, we must first accept them. It is an idea that became central to many of the secular<br />

systems of psychotherapy that began with S. Freud. 73<br />

3. Psychiatric treatment<br />

<strong>The</strong> modern inheritance from the ancient traditions of mental practices that engage with potentially<br />

destructive human emotions is psychotherapy. It is a set of practices started in Vienna by Sigmund Freud<br />

70 Oatley, Emotions, pp. 51-2.<br />

71 Spinoza, <strong>The</strong> Ethics, p. 176.<br />

72 Ibid., p. 178.<br />

73 Oatley, Emotions, p. 52.<br />

491<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

at the end of the nineteenth century which, by the beginning of the twenty-first century, has spawned<br />

hundreds, perhaps thousands of variants. Like the ancient Epicureans, Freud based the practices of his<br />

kind of therapy, which he called psychoanalysis, on the idea that some of our desires unconscious. For<br />

Freud, the principal desire is for sex. He thought sex was the source of all creativity.<br />

By contrast, the second problematic desire - for aggression - is destructive. <strong>The</strong> central notion of<br />

psychoanalytic therapy was that although they are unconscious, these desires nonetheless affect our<br />

behavior pervasively. While they remain unconscious, their effects occur without our being able to do<br />

much about them. <strong>The</strong>y remain outside our power. Freud’s answer, then, was excavate in ourselves these<br />

desires, bring them to the surface, and make them conscious. 74 This archeological metaphor was one of<br />

Freud’s favorites. Once one had brought one’s disowned intentions to consciousness, it would be possible<br />

to take responsibility for them, and in that movement we could be free of their tyranny over us. 75<br />

Tim Beck was working as a psychoanalytic psychotherapist when he realized that many of the thoughts<br />

that patients had, (which, according to Freud, were to spoken aloud during therapy so that the therapist<br />

could analyse them by suggesting their unconscious origins), were not really quite unconscious. Rather,<br />

they hovered at a kind of threshold between the conscious and the unconscious. In a therapy session, they<br />

might seem too unimportant, or too embarrassing , to say out loud. Yet it was these thoughts (Chrysippean<br />

first movements) that were the real culprits. From this insight, Beck developed cognitive behavioral<br />

therapy. 76<br />

V. Conclusion<br />

Cicero thought that the lifestyle the Epicureans pursued was weak and cowardly. As a result, Cicero did<br />

not find anything positive in the Epicureans’ therapy of the mind. Cicero did not see the advice to distance<br />

oneself from thinking (avocatio), and to divert one’s attention to other matters (revocatio) was bad in<br />

itself, but he thought that the Epicureans’ advice to think about past and future pleasures was ineffective as<br />

a healing solution for intense pain and even harmful to the soul. 77<br />

74 Please refer to the following work for detailed explanation. Sigmund Freud, <strong>The</strong> Origins of Psychoanalysis: Letters to Wilhelm<br />

Fliess 1887-1902 (M. Bonaparte et al eds.)(New York: Basic Books, 1954).<br />

75 Oatley, Emotions, p. 53.<br />

76 Please refer to the following two works for detailed explanation. A. T. Beck et al, Cognitive <strong>The</strong>rapy of Depression (New York<br />

: Guilford, 1979); S.D. Hollen et al, Cognitive-behavioral treatment of depression in Handbook of depression I. H. Gotlib et al<br />

eds. (New York: Gilford, 2002), pp. 383-403.<br />

77 Knuuttila, Emotions, p. 74. As mentioned above, Cicero’s theory will be dealt in a separate dissertation.<br />

492


In healing the modern person’s pain through a humanities’ approach, philosophy which deals with the<br />

human emotions can be a ‘medicine for soul.’ A philosophical method of healing difficulties and pain<br />

that the modern person experiences by inheriting the thoughts of Aristotle and of the Stoics of the ancient<br />

times, as well as Spinoza and Hume in the modern times, would have a remarkable advantage as a healing<br />

method.<br />

From the late 20 th century unto today, the social order of neo-liberalism has made the majority of the<br />

population suffer under a cold reality of ‘winner-take-all.’ With the gap between the rich and the poor<br />

reaching extreme limits, many people who are driven to an underclass or temporary worker status suffer<br />

with the sense of deprivation and isolation while struggling to survive. <strong>The</strong>refore, what is first needed of<br />

the modern person is to get rid of the futile desire within himself or herself. If a minority of humankind<br />

threw away their greed, this could be a world where the majority of humankind can co-exist.<br />

Also, whether conscious or buried in our subconscious, we need to recognize the true form of the desires<br />

that are lurking within us. Only then would we be able to encounter the opportunity to free ourselves from<br />

the ‘tyranny of emotions’ or the ‘human bondage.’ Above all, each one of us should have sympathy 78 for<br />

those around us who are suffering and foster a benevolent emotion of healing the pain of others. This is<br />

an urgently needed virtue that will help us attain our own peace of mind and happiness as well as help the<br />

majority of humankind who are living a hard reality.<br />

78 Please refer to the following work for the concept of ‘sympathy.’ Wooryong, Park, “<strong>The</strong> Ethical Philosophy of Scottish<br />

Enlightenment: Adam Smith’s ‘sympathy’ and ‘impartial spectator,’” <strong>The</strong> 1 st <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong> Presentations (Korea<br />

National Comission for UNESCO, 2011), pp. 244-54.<br />

493<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

<strong>The</strong> Healing Function of Talchum<br />

Hyun Shik Ju<br />

Sogang University<br />

1. Introduction<br />

<strong>The</strong> study of talchum, or mask dance, flowered during the 1970s and 80s and ensuing studies followed the<br />

steps of these standardized researches, usually focusing on a few themes such as the social functionality<br />

or the origin of talchum. Research on social functionality focused on the lower class’ social resistance<br />

that grew in the late Joseon Period with the development of commercial capitalism and urbanization. 1<br />

Meanwhile, research on the origin of talchum approached the topic with hypothetical theories that it<br />

originated from sandahee (makeshift stages made for medieval masked drama), from instrumental music,<br />

or from pungmul (farmers’ musical instruments). 2<br />

<strong>The</strong>se researches, meaningful as pioneer works, failed to address the powerful healing potential talchum<br />

has as drama. Even studies that partially recognize the healing function only focused on how the ruling<br />

class used talchum to maintain the existing class system. <strong>The</strong>se studies explain that the ruling class<br />

allowed their servants to resolve their suppressed emotions and desires through drama, and as a result, the<br />

ruling class was able to maintain the class system. This explanation is wanting because it does not include<br />

the transformation process of individuals and groups that takes place through talchum performance. 3<br />

Talchum inherently has powerful potential to heal. This is suggested by the custom handed down in Hahoe<br />

Village, that is, if villagers felt there was an ill omen in the village, then they took it as a sign to perform<br />

Hahoe byeolsingut (Hahoe village ritual to serve the village spirit) and Hahoe talnori (Hahoe village mask<br />

1 Jo Dongil. History and Principle of Talchum. Hongseongsa. 1979.<br />

2 Lee Duhyeon. Korean talchum. Iljisa. 1981. Seo Yeonho. On Site Study of Korean Handed down Performance. Jipmundang.<br />

1997. Jo Dongil. Op.cit. Park Jintae. Study on Korean Mask Play. Saemunsa. 1985. Kim Yeolgyu. “Talchum in the Context of<br />

Reality.” Finding Classic Literature. Kim Yeolgyu et al. Munhakgwa Jiseongsa. 1976, pp. 383-407.<br />

3 Kim Ukdong. Aesthetic of Talchum. Hyeongamsa. 1994.<br />

494


dance). Describing talchum as a subversive satire of the lower class and an attack on the ruling class, or<br />

saying the opposite, that it was a safeguard mechanism that supported the yangban system by weakening<br />

the hostile public sentiment, attaches too much importance on only one side of the socio-psychological<br />

meaning talchum performance has. This paper starts out from this point of criticism and attempts to<br />

understand talchum’s healing functionality comprehensively.<br />

This paper is based on the following assumptions from a drama therapy perspective. First, talchum creates<br />

a stage for the suppressed unconscious, so the act of participating in talchum itself is a healing process.<br />

Second, the gwangdae, or performer, plays the role of therapist to the village audience, but because he<br />

reflects and transforms the life experience of the village community as a village member as well, he<br />

himself is a patient. Third, therefore, talchum is the transformative process of the self and community,<br />

recovered to health from illness through care and healing. To illustrate this point, the first part of the body<br />

will explore the overall structure that talchum performance has as a drama therapy process. Afterwards,<br />

the second part will identify the performance form 4 of each episode and explore which factors or drama<br />

therapy techniques are actually used in the talchum episodes.<br />

Of course, there are many ways to approach drama therapy. Some examples include cognitive healing,<br />

behavioral healing, or psychoanalytic healing derived from analytic healing or object relations theory.<br />

However, one of the most widely accepted drama therapy theories today is Sue Jennings’ EPR theory<br />

(Embodiment, Projection, Role), a developmental paradigm that charts the progression of dramatic play<br />

in human life. Another is Robert J. Landy’s approach to drama therapy through role playing and Phil<br />

Jones’ approach based on Jenning and Landy’s approach, but with additions of play, ritual, symbolism and<br />

metaphor. 5<br />

However, the purpose of this paper is not to use these various drama therapy theories as tools of analysis<br />

to mechanically analyze which drama therapy techniques exist in talchum. Rather, the drama therapy<br />

theories will be applied to talchum to find out if the talchum performance has inherent healing aspects,<br />

then what “affected part” it is healing, and what the gained “health” is. In other words, by studying the<br />

process of drama therapy and the talchum scenes assumed to be the factors of technique, this paper will<br />

illustrate the meanings “illness,” “healing,” “health” have in the cultural context manifested in talchum<br />

4 <strong>The</strong> talchum performance scenes in this paper are from the following recording. Lee Duhyeon. Korean Mask Plays. Gyomunsa.<br />

1997.<br />

5 Sue Jennings. trans. Lee Hyeowon. Dramatherapy. Ullyuk. 2003. Robert J. Landy. trans. Lee Hyeowon. Persona and<br />

Performance: <strong>The</strong> Meaning of Role in Drama, <strong>The</strong>rapy, and Everyday Life. Hakjisa. 2010. Phil Jones. Drama as therapy:<br />

theory, practice, and research <strong>2nd</strong> ed. Routledge, 2007.<br />

495<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

talchum and gut, to life’s insight, as they leave the therapeutic space.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, the talchum procedure itself inherently contains the structural form for natural therapy<br />

as shown by how it is staged with gut and by how it deals with life’s problems and experiences and<br />

dramatizes them.<br />

3. Drama <strong>The</strong>rapy Techniques in Talchum<br />

3.1 Embodiment: Creating Time and Space for <strong>The</strong>rapy<br />

Life expressed in talchum is the life of the body. <strong>The</strong> world reenacted in talchum is made aware in the<br />

body and through the body. <strong>The</strong> oral sound overflowing with breath, exaggerated gesture, the spatially<br />

close movements through dance medium, masks carved in curves, colorful clothes, and music resonating<br />

through the various instruments, make it possible for the participant to understand the world through<br />

concrete, sensorial subjectivity rather than in an abstract manner. <strong>The</strong>n, what therapeutic functions<br />

accompany the dramatic bodily expression of talchum?<br />

In the Chimnori (literally translates to “acupuncture play”) episode in the Songpa sandaenori, the<br />

character Meokjung’s nephews lie on stage. <strong>The</strong>y are suspected to suffer from gwangyeok. Gwangyeok<br />

is sudden indigestion accompanied by heaviness in chest, not being able to vomit or relieve oneself.<br />

<strong>The</strong> character Sinjubu appears and applies acupuncture to the four joints of hands and feet to help chi<br />

flow through their bodies. <strong>The</strong>n, as soon as he has applied acupuncture, the eight Meokjungs get up at<br />

surprising speed.<br />

One of the key principles of drama therapy that uses the body is to make the patient himself use his<br />

“potential” body more effectively. In other words, the patient breaks out of the force of habit, and even<br />

if he is not familiar with it, inhabits himself in the new body frame and establishes a new relationship<br />

between the body and self, which leads to the identity change of the patient. That is why during drama<br />

therapy patients practice making new voices and dynamic gestures. 10<br />

<strong>The</strong> scene where the Meokjungs pop up from near-death state after getting acupuncture treatment from<br />

Sinjubu induces a comic effect on the first level. But the comically exaggerated gestures imply that the<br />

feeling for the body’s potential to recover abnormally fast is the most proactive affective element 11 that<br />

10 Ibid., pp. 229-230.<br />

11 For more on the body’s active affective component refer to Michelle Maiese, Embodiment, emotion, and cognition. Palgrave<br />

498


makes up the actor’s existence. Awareness of the self is mainly transmitted through the body. <strong>The</strong> recovery<br />

process of Haeseo Meokjungs is thought to be dormant but it is stronger than any existential sense and by<br />

forming a relationship between the self and body, stages the creation of a new identity.<br />

In the Nojang (literally translates to “old esteemed monk”) episode of Bongsan talchum, the old monk’s<br />

gesture is meaningful from the perspective of drama therapy. <strong>The</strong> Nojang is a respected old monk, but he<br />

is portrayed as being affected by Somu. <strong>The</strong> Nojang episode, shortly, is the fall of the old monk. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

is no dialogue, but the Nojang gestures his interest in Sojang. For example, he runs to the corner as if<br />

not knowing what to do with his aroused feeling. Afterwards, he opens his fan and looks at Somu from<br />

a distance. <strong>The</strong>n, he throws away the monk’s rod yukhwanjang, and runs to the other side corner passing<br />

by Somu, only to look at her again. After repeating this action two or three times, Nojang still fails to buy<br />

Somu’s heart. <strong>The</strong>n he dances with his hands and takes off the Buddhist rosaries and puts them around<br />

Somu’s neck. 12<br />

Other than discovering the body’s potential, taking up a different identity and “transforming the body”<br />

also has therapeutic effect. <strong>The</strong> patient takes on the identity of another character or object by acting the<br />

role of a character different from the usual self, or expressing kinetic objects like water. By adjusting to<br />

the body of a dramatic persona, the patient gets to change his usual identity into another form. 13<br />

<strong>The</strong> deviating actions by Nojang, unbecoming to a monk, has so far been interpreted as a satire on the<br />

fall of the religious class. But, the transcendental religious space is considered transcendental because it<br />

stems from the cognitive freedom that does not distinguish how secular baseness is a contrasting area.<br />

Could not the fall of Nojang, that was until now seen as fallen Buddhism, be understood to symbolize<br />

the true structural aspect where a transcendental existence has to directly conflict with the inner world<br />

in order for it to become a transcendental existence? 14 It embodies an identity element that exists<br />

internally, and through this, provides an area for the monk’s religious self to explore the base emotions,<br />

character, and experience that it had not felt before. <strong>The</strong> body is the inner source of self and is the zero<br />

degree of objective self. We cannot deny that a therapeutic effect exists when Nojang makes a “bodily<br />

transformation” into a seducer which brings to the forefront what was unclear to the self before because it<br />

Macmillan. 2011., p. 26.<br />

12 This description follows Lee Duhyeon’s description. Lee Duhyeon (1981). Op. cit., p.164.<br />

13 Jones. Op. cit., pp. 230-232.<br />

14 For more analysis of the Nojang episode interpreted from this perspective, refer to Yu Minyeong. “Korean’s Beauty as shown<br />

in Korean Traditional <strong>The</strong>ater: Focused on the Bongsan talchum and Kkodugaksi noreum”. Dosoleomun 1 st edition. Department<br />

of Korean Literature, <strong>Humanities</strong>, Danguk University. 1985, pp. 45-61.<br />

499<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

provides direct communication between the unconscious and the conscious.<br />

In the Miyalchum (literally translates to “Miyal’s dance”) of Bongsan talchum, an old man is reunited<br />

with Miyal. He tells her of the sufferings he went through after the two were separated in the chaos.<br />

Another therapeutic technique factor can be found here. In particular, there is a scene where the old man<br />

tells Miyal of how he met with the sandaedogam people and refused to give in to their demand for him<br />

to pay tax. <strong>The</strong>n they stole his hat and attire and he had to go about with a hat made out of dog leather.<br />

Exploring a troubling memory related to the physical body during drama leads to an act of exploring the<br />

social, political forces carved in the physical trauma. <strong>The</strong> physical body can function as a different system,<br />

so it can function as a social body. “Exploring the forces related to bodily memory” of the past imbues<br />

to the current body temporal depth where the body’s horizon can be expanded. In other words, the active<br />

exploration of the memory remnant in the body strengthens the body’s potential to create meaning and<br />

allows a person to take interest in a socio-cultural relationship the body does not experience usually. That<br />

is the creation of therapeutic space. 15<br />

As the old man’s dialogue suggests, he had to wear a hat made out of dog leather because of the<br />

bureaucrats’ tyranny. <strong>The</strong> old man who is the subversive class to the social and political power of the<br />

bureaucrats, is limited to wearing certain things. However, due to the “trace left on the body,” or the dog<br />

leather hat, the old man and Miyal become aware of the socio-political force affecting their body, and<br />

can use that awareness to form a different relationship to their bodies, which has therapeutic effect. <strong>The</strong><br />

body’s potential, bodily change, and the remnant memory left on the body are decisive factors that create<br />

a therapeutic time and space during the talchum’s dramatic activity. Because the performer’s body can’t<br />

be separated from the external environment, that is, the time and place where talchum is performed, the<br />

performer’s body holds a dual position as an agent and object. <strong>The</strong>refore, the renewed relationship with<br />

the body becomes the base for the renewed relationship with the environment.<br />

3.2 Projection: Projecting Inner State<br />

According to Sue Jennings, the projection phase follows the embodiment phase from the perspective<br />

of the children’s dramatic development. During initial infancy, bodily and sensorial actions take up the<br />

biggest part of the child, but as the child grows, he projects his emotions into objects outside of his body<br />

and enjoys more complex experience. 16 <strong>The</strong>refore, the projection technique used in drama therapy is<br />

different from projection in psychoanalysis, which is a defense mechanism where one blames another<br />

15 Jones. Op. cit., p. 232.<br />

16 Jennings. Op. cit., pp. 70-73.<br />

500


person for his unsatisfied needs. Dramatic projection, in its therapeutic meaning, expresses one’s internal<br />

conflict through an external object which allows the individual to form a new relationship with himself. 17<br />

In Halmimadang (literally translates to “Grandmother episode”) in Hahoe talnori, an old woman appears<br />

and laments her fortune through the beteulga, or loom song. Her fate is pitiful indeed. <strong>The</strong> old woman<br />

mournfully sings the beteulga complaining about her hard life as a woman, wearing a small gourd tied to<br />

her bent over back and a white towel on her head. Her gesture of sighing deeply and looking into space<br />

builds on the sorrow. However, when the musician asks her what she did with the ten herrings she bought<br />

yesterday she replies, “I cooked one for the old man and ate nine” wiping out any negative emotion she<br />

had been expressing until then. People play the role of eating characters throughout their lives, but their<br />

eating purpose differs for each age group. For example, the act of eating during infancy is related to play,<br />

eating during adolescence is related to appearance, and eating during adulthood is related to taste, but<br />

eating during old age is done merely out of necessity. 18 However, based on this relationship between<br />

eating and age, the old woman is deviating from the role of her age in regards to eating. In reality, it is<br />

almost impossible for an old person to have enough energy to finish off nine fish at the same time. In<br />

the end, the old woman might be projecting her hardships on the loom song but through the medium of<br />

“herring,” she comes to terms with the negative conflict she has with herself and adjusts her emotion to<br />

express the vitality of life.<br />

Chwibarimadang (literally translates to “Chwibari episode”) in Yangju byeolsan daenori is also<br />

noteworthy when it comes to projection. In this stage, the character Chwibari also plays the role of his son<br />

Madangi. He sits a doll on his lap and uses ventriloquism to mimic baby voices. Chwibari goes back and<br />

forth the dialogue between the adult and child which shows the skillfulness of the performance. However,<br />

couldn’t Chwibari playing two roles be interpreted as an experience where Chwibari projects his other<br />

side? It is as if a patient uses the doll as a means to express his unconscious matter. To Chwibari, it is a<br />

joy to watch his son Madangi learn to read. However, while he sings to Madangi the Korean alphabet,<br />

he laments his position which expresses the suffering he must endure as a father. In summary, Chwibari<br />

projects the joys and sorrows as the head of a family through the doll, the child proxy, and through this,<br />

explores his life.<br />

As seen above, the characters of Halmi episode and Chwibari episode use songs or objects like food<br />

or doll to externalize their inner world. <strong>The</strong>re is no other counterpart role. However, in the end, the old<br />

woman and Chwibari project their thoughts and feelings into the external objects, and end up seeing and<br />

17 Jones. Op.cit., pp. 137-154.<br />

18 Landy. Op. cit., p. 253.<br />

501<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

feeling themselves, and create a therapeutic space where they can renew, expand, and transform their<br />

relationship to the self. This is very similar to the “small world” technique 19 in drama therapy where<br />

the patient is given dolls, drawings, sculpture, clay, dialogue, etc. and are told to project their inner<br />

conflict into the objects, releasing their unconsciously suppressed feelings. However, when considering<br />

that talchum is another virtual (as if) world using the medium of mask, we soon realize that the act of<br />

performing talchum in itself is a projected area where the performing agent can explore, expand, build on<br />

and discover the self. In other words, if wearing the tal, or mask in itself, is the process of standing outside<br />

and looking at the self, then it would be worthy to discuss the therapeutic function which forms the basis<br />

of talchum.<br />

3.3 Play and Ritual: Rehearsal as Another Existential Method<br />

Talchum can also be called “talnori” (literally translates to “mask play”). As can be deduced from the<br />

individual names Sandaetalnori (“sandae mask play”), Ogwangdaenoreum (“five gwangdae play”),<br />

Yaryu (“outing”), Kkokdugaksinoreum (“puppet play”), talchum performance takes place in a space where<br />

reality and play meet. What kind of therapeutic functionalities do these play factors have?<br />

One of the plays that often appear in talchum is the sensory-motor play. For example, take the Omjung<br />

and Mokjung episode in Yangju byeolsandae nori. In one scene, Mokjung rips off Omjung’s hat and attire<br />

and eats them. Omjung was using his hat to describe sorghum pancake and mungbean pancake, and the<br />

hungry Mokjung thought that the hat was the actual food and ate them. <strong>The</strong> almost dizzying overturning<br />

play is a stage for vertigo. <strong>The</strong> food system of everyday life is applied and expanded to costume, and the<br />

stability that food had is suddenly destroyed.<br />

Mimicry, which is the imitation of the gesture and dialogue of others, also appears often. In<br />

Dongnaeyaryu, Yangban Won calls his servant Malttugi saying “Hey Malttugi!” and makes a gesture of<br />

cocking his ears. <strong>The</strong>n Yangban Cha and Yangban Mo copy him in calling Malttugi and cocking their ears.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n the bachelor of the head house also follows the voice and gesture of the three older men, but he adds<br />

comic variation to the voice or gesture, inducing laughter. Even if the mimicry requires the self to become<br />

another person, the person must first realize that he is separate from the other. <strong>The</strong> act of mimicking occurs<br />

when there is an assumption that the mimicking person and the mimicked are distinguished. <strong>The</strong>refore, the<br />

mimicking play of talchum creates a mixed middle area where the self and other are mutually dependent<br />

yet separate from each other.<br />

19 For detailed explanation, refer to Jones. Op. cit., pp. 144-145.<br />

502


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

afterworld) to comfort the spirit and guide her to the afterworld. It is the same for Yongnam area talchum.<br />

In particular, in Suyeongyaryu, when the old woman dies, a pallbearer sings the hearse song carrying<br />

the coffin out of the house-as such, the traditional funeral process was reenacted. How to deal with<br />

sudden death that has intervened in life is a very important issue that needs to be dealt by the surviving<br />

community. Reversely speaking, the body serves as a physical basis that acts as a “necropolitics and<br />

biopolitics of the survivors.” In talchum, rituals such as gut or funeral processes, display Miyal’s body<br />

publicly and intervene with her body, and through this, control the uncertain feeling that the surviving<br />

people have due to death. Just because the survivors have witnessed her death does not mean that Miyal’s<br />

sorrow is going to resolved. However, even if there is nothing resolved in reality, the “expression of<br />

‘han’ (sorrow) emotion” caused by Miyal’s sudden death helps the survivors approach the wishful<br />

experience of reaching the end of existence like rejecting the suppressed. 22 As a result, it terminates the<br />

self-consciousness of each of the performing actors and imbues stability called continuity and solidarity in<br />

their community, providing the gwangdae and audience alike an experience of renewing the world. Unlike<br />

play, ritual pursues the feelings of control, but it still pushes the performing actor of talchum to change<br />

into another identity, providing therapeutic effect.<br />

Play and ritual are commonly used techniques in drama therapy. For example, during drama therapy, play/<br />

game is prepared to introduce the patient’s spontaneity and creativity, and an effective ritual is devised<br />

to give a stable force to the past events that the patient experienced. 23 <strong>The</strong> chaos-like play and cosmos-<br />

like ritual form a whirlpool mixed in talchum, allowing the participants to rehearse different methods of<br />

existence. Haeseo talchum performance has therapeutic functions because its fundamental performance<br />

structure is based on the identical twins play and ritual.<br />

3.4 Symbol and Metaphor: Expanding the Concept of Self through Indirect Experience<br />

Usually, symbol and metaphor are thought of as speaking and writing strategies used to effectively<br />

get the message across from the speaker to the audience. However, with the appearance of cognitive<br />

linguists like George Lakeoff, the perception of symbol and metaphor, which had been limited to rhetoric,<br />

changed. According to cognitive theory, rhetoric is not just a method of expression. Lakeoff explains that<br />

the real function of symbol and metaphor is the mental experience of association, trying to approach a<br />

new situation or a hidden meaning based on one’s familiar world. As such, expanding one’s experience<br />

and boundary is possible through symbolism and metaphor; so when trying to handle an inner problem<br />

22 Experiencing ‘han (deep sorrow)’ does not only exist as a solidified lump of emotion, but also the moment when that lump is<br />

liquidized. <strong>The</strong>refore, “han” should not be seen as a fixed psychological phenomenon. Op. cit., pp. 259-261.<br />

23 Jones. Op. cit., p.165, p. 253.<br />

504


indirectly and not directly, symbolism and metaphor have therapeutic effect. 24<br />

In Kkokdugaksi noreum (“puppet play”), Park Cheomji builds a monastery at a propitious site after the<br />

Pyeongyang Inspector dies, in order to hold the post-death 49th day ritual. However, after the monastery<br />

is built, Park Cheomji destroys the building he built with his own hands. As Kim Wook-dong points out,<br />

if building a new house symbolizes human birth, then destroying a newly built house symbolizes death in<br />

a narrow sense, and the end of universe if translated broadly. 25 However, the inevitable death symbolized<br />

through the destroyed monastery is reenacted during the play as well. For example, there is a blood bath<br />

scene in the play where the characters in Kkokdugaksi noreum-Pijori1, Pijori2, Gwipari, Small Park<br />

Cheomji, Pyo Shangwon, Dongbangsak, Mukdaesa etc-are all bitten to death by the monster Isimi. Just as<br />

Park Cheomji destroyed the monastery he built with much effort, there is no reason why all the characters<br />

are bitten to death by the monster Isimi. <strong>The</strong> repeated act of destruction, and repetition of death urges<br />

are only left as “symbol.” However the stage with dissolving, collapsing, breaking scenes is grouped<br />

into one symbolic sign and transmitted to the performers as various groups of potential meaning. It is a<br />

process where the fantastic world inside the unconscious mind is expressed outwardly, like the dream in<br />

psychoanalysis. <strong>The</strong> symbolic staging of this destructive instinct provides an opportunity to the audience<br />

to participate in their personal experience in a more uncertain way. Because it is an expansion of one’s<br />

own experience, the presentation of repeated death drive engendering derivative open meaning becomes<br />

the basis for understanding the symbol of Kkokdugaksi noreum as a therapeutic tool.<br />

In talchum, “metaphor” is created especially when another person’s identity is involved. In the Yangban<br />

espisode in Suyongyaryu, Su Yangban describes the bachelor of the head family saying “the bachelor<br />

standing there is like a well-built swallow. When he sits, he is like a peony, and when he stands he is like<br />

a wood opal.” He expresses his pride of being a yangban by beautifying the bachelor’s appearance. In<br />

the Ogwangdae episode of Goseong ogwangdae, Malttugi portrays the yangbans, who are standing, as<br />

“puppies gathered in an empty lot and turtles gathered in a pond,” associating them to puppies or turtles<br />

and making fun of yangbans. In Miyalchum episode of Bongsan talchum, the old woman remembers the<br />

separated old man as having a handrail forehead, a scoop-like chin, dog-like nose, broad cheeks and beard<br />

like a lacquer brush, expressing her resentment. <strong>The</strong>refore, the bachelor of the head family, yangbans, old<br />

man and other characters that represent original concepts, is spoken of in a roundabout manner compared<br />

to swallows, puppies, handrails, etc. that are familiar areas and complementary concepts. By doing so,<br />

a new cognitive image is formed and strong emotional involvement is formed. <strong>The</strong> creative process of<br />

24 For more on the therapeutic effect of metaphor, refer to Jeong Seongmi. “Metaphor, the language of emotion and humanities<br />

therapy.” Inmun gwahak yeongu 24 th edition. Research Center of <strong>Humanities</strong>, Gangwon University. 2010, pp. 201-220.<br />

25 Kim Ukdong. Op. cit., p. 111.<br />

505<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

metaphorical reality contributes in setting a special relationship between the talchum performers with the<br />

objects, so it provides another process of therapy of self exploration and transformation.<br />

In addition to the above, many symbols and metaphors can be found in talchum. <strong>The</strong> creation of symbolic<br />

and metaphorical situations probably made it possible for associative meaning and emotional value to<br />

communicate in the stage of performance. That process associates the performers to the uncertain meaning<br />

of the performance stage and allows them to expand the individual self, another therapeutic process. 26<br />

3.5 Role Playing: Deconstruction and Growth of Identity<br />

When discussing a person’s identity, usually the essence of the person is brought forth. Identity is defined<br />

as something that forms the inner basis, thought, personality, and emotion that is stable and continuous,<br />

predictable and unchanging. However, from when discussing roles, the assumption that a person has<br />

only one identity would not be correct. During the early stage of human development, we “receive” the<br />

initial role of infant, then, as we grow older we “acquire” secondary roles decided by social relationships-<br />

physical role, cognitive role, definitive role, and socio-cultural role. <strong>The</strong>n we “act” the received and<br />

acquired roles according to context, and create an acceptable personality. <strong>The</strong>se acted roles form<br />

various collective roles, and only when these role systems are healthy, can the human be mentally and<br />

physically free from illness. A healthy role system refers to having the flexibility to expand and retract<br />

one’s self portrait to fit the endless role changes. In this view, a person’s identity is not found in a fixed<br />

actual essence. Rather, the deconstruction and rebirth of the self following the expansion and reduction,<br />

intersection and separation of role system, in other words, the self that exists in a fluid relationship found<br />

in transformative flexibility is the true meaning of identity. 27<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, the act of a performer wearing a “mask” that is different from his usual role, and it is an<br />

experience trying to skillfully act the possibility of transforming and shifting existing roles within the<br />

role systems where various roles are grouped together. <strong>The</strong>n, what are some scenes where the therapeutic<br />

meaning role playing of talchum is clearly shown?<br />

In the Yonggam and Halmi gwangdae chum (literally translates to “old man and old woman dance”), the<br />

jangu player suggests to the old woman to sing the ibyeolga, or farewell song. <strong>The</strong> jangu player advises<br />

26 For more on the use of symbol and metaphor as techniques of drama therapy, refer to Jones. Op. cit., pp. 241-269.<br />

27 Related to the human development stages, Robert Landy emphasizes the dramatic development of role receiver, role acquirer,<br />

and role player. According to the role approach, an important purpose of dramatherapy is to gain the health of role system.<br />

Randy. Op. cit., pp. 68-84.<br />

506


her that if she sings the song well, then she might be able to find the old man easily again. So the old<br />

woman takes his advice and sings the ilbyeolga in the jinyang rhythm. One of the therapeutic methods<br />

related to role playing in drama therapy is to take fictitious matters like story, song, sculpture, art, and<br />

make the patient play the role of the storyteller, singer. In this scene, the jangu player is the therapist and<br />

the old woman is the patient. And the old woman singing a fictitious matter is a type of reenactment of<br />

role training to get in touch with the suppressed inner self.<br />

In the Pungja tal episode (literally translates to “satire mask”) of Tongyeong ogwangdae, there is a scene<br />

where the yangbans tell Malttugi, who had been making fun of them, to talk about himself. <strong>The</strong>n the<br />

“servant” Malttugi reveals that his ancestor‘s family is of a prestigious line and goes on to brag about his<br />

grandfather and father’s high posts. He rebukes the yangbans saying that “you are not even worthy to be<br />

servants in my household.” Rebuked, the yangbans call Malttugi Park Saengwon and beg him to spare<br />

them, but Maltuggi dismisses them because he does not even want to look at them. <strong>The</strong> reenactment of<br />

this scene is Maltuggi’s fantasy acted out in dramatic reality. Malttugi is a yangban’s servant, so the scene<br />

of being higher than the yangbans and rebuking them is something that is only possible in his imagination.<br />

Another therapeutic technique related to drama therapy role playing is to make the patient act themselves<br />

in the context of past, present, future, and fantasy situations. <strong>The</strong>refore Malttugi’s loud rebuke is the<br />

expression of another role in a fantasy situation that was suppressed.<br />

In the monk episode of Gasan ogwangdae, unlike the other nojang (old monk) talchum episodes that<br />

are silent, the old monk in this episode says the dialogue “let us rid of monkhood.” <strong>The</strong>n he takes off his<br />

monk hat, throws away and breaks the wooden block, tears off the Buddhist rosaries necklace, breaks<br />

the bamboo cane he was using, and throws off the broad-sleeved Buddhist robe he was wearing. As<br />

mentioned above, the monk’s fall process is partially a criticism of society. However, when viewed from<br />

the process of true seeking, just as the monk Wonhyo drank rotten water from a skull, the old monk’s fall<br />

includes dialectics of the sacred and the profane. In this sense, we cannot deny that the episode where<br />

the old esteemed monk destroys his monkhood has therapeutic meaning. In drama therapy, the patient is<br />

asked to separate his identity and to act out a special aspect of himself, which forms the basis of playing<br />

a creative role in everyday life. For example, playing one’s “arm” or “leg,” or separating the roles in life<br />

that one would like to sabotage and acting it out. Performing oneself has therapeutic functions that will<br />

form the potential identity. <strong>The</strong>refore, the old monk’s fall should not be seen only from the satirical aspect.<br />

Rather, it is a sufficiently worthy task to view the monk’s fall as a performance of the role that is denied by<br />

the self, and a method of self exploration through expressing life’s experience and problems. 28<br />

28 For detailed information on how to take on roles, refer to Jones. Op. cit., p. 193.<br />

507<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

2005. pp. 313-345.<br />

Park Jintae. Study on Korean Mask Play. Saemunsa. 1985.<br />

Park Jintae. Study on Hahoe byeolsingut Formation and Structure. Dissertation of Department of Korean<br />

Literature, Korea University. 1988.<br />

Bae Heesuk, Lee Seonhyeong. “Effect of Group Language <strong>The</strong>rapy using Play has on the Language and<br />

Social skills of Children with Language Disability and Lack of Social Skills.” Drama yeongu 34th<br />

edition. Hanguk drama hakhoe. 2011. pp. 223-252.<br />

Seo Yeonho. On Site Study of Korean Handed down Performance. Jipmundang. 1997.<br />

Shin Eungyeong. Pungryu : Source of East Asian Aesthetics. Bogosa, 1999.<br />

Yu Minyeong. “Korean’s Beauty as shown in Korean Traditional <strong>The</strong>ater Focused on the Bongsan<br />

talchum and Kkodugaksi noreum.” Dosoleomun 1st edition. Department of Korean Literature,<br />

<strong>Humanities</strong>, Danguk University. 1985. pp. 45-61.<br />

Lee Gyeongmi. “Phenomenological Approach to Dramatherapy Focused on the Expansion of experience<br />

through ‘Drama’ and the Role of <strong>The</strong>rapist.” Hanguk yeongeukak 45th edition. Hanguk yeongeuk<br />

hakhoe. 2011. pp. 269-292.<br />

Lee Duhyeon. Korean Talchum. Iljisa. 1981.<br />

Yun Ilsu. “Effect of <strong>The</strong>rapy and Intervention of Psychodrama.” Drama yeongu 37th edition. Hanguk<br />

drama hakhoe. 2012. pp. 85-116.<br />

Jeong Seongmi. “Metaphor, the language of emotion and humanities therapy.” Inmun gwahak yeongu<br />

24th edition. Research Center of <strong>Humanities</strong>, Gangwon University. 2010. pp. 201-220.<br />

Jo Dongil. History and Principle of talchum. Hongseongsa. 1979.<br />

Choi Byeongwook. “Background and Establishment, Definition and Target of <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy.”<br />

Research Center of <strong>Humanities</strong>, Gangwon University. <strong>The</strong>ory and Principle of <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy.<br />

Sanchaek. 2011. pp. 11-36.<br />

3. Foreign Reference<br />

Carlson, Marvin. Performance : a critical introduction. Routledge, 1996.<br />

Jennings, Sue. trans. Lee Hyeowon. (Sue Jennings) Dramatherapy. Ullyuk. 2003.<br />

Jones, Phil. Drama as therapy : theory, practice, and research <strong>2nd</strong> ed. Routledge, 2007.<br />

Johnson, David Read. trans. Kim Sejun et al. Current Approaches in Drama <strong>The</strong>rapy. Sigma Press. 2011.<br />

Landy, Robert J. trans. Lee Hyeowon. Persona and Performance: <strong>The</strong> Meaning of Role in Drama,<br />

<strong>The</strong>rapy, and Everyday Life. Hakjisa. 2010.<br />

Maiese, Michelle. Embodiment, emotion, and cognition. Palgrave Macmillan. 2011.<br />

510


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Parallel Session 2-3<br />

Diseases, Pathology and Social Healing<br />

1. Society as a Patient: Metapathology, Healing and Challenges of<br />

Self and Social Transformations<br />

/ Ananta Kumar Giri (Madras Institute of Development Studies)<br />

2. Princess Bari, Answering the Conundrum of Sufferings of the<br />

<strong>World</strong><br />

/ Kang Ha Yu (Kangwon National University)<br />

3. Displacement as Disease: Exploring the Links between<br />

Traditional Healing and Well-Being in the Context of a<br />

Relocation Crisis<br />

/ Ronel P. Dela Cruz (St. Paul University Quezon City)<br />

4. Treatment of Hwabyung in Traditional Medicine with Four<br />

Elements of Non-Violent Communication<br />

/ Young-Wan Kim (Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine)


Society as a Patient:<br />

Metapathology, Healing and Challenges of Self and Social<br />

Transformations<br />

Ananta Kumar Giri<br />

Madras Institute of Development Studies<br />

In order to speak of a social pathology [...] we require a conception of normality related to social<br />

life as a whole. <strong>The</strong> immense difficulty involved in this project has been made evident by the<br />

failure of social-scientific approaches that have sought to fix the functional requirements of<br />

societies solely through external observations. Since what counts as a developmental goal or as<br />

normality is always culturally defined, it is only by a hermeneutic reference to a society’s self-<br />

understanding that social functions of their disorders can be determined. Thus we may have a<br />

defensive possibility of speaking of social pathologies within a culturally contingent notion of<br />

normality, since we can limit ourselves to an empirical description of what a given culture regards<br />

as a disorder. [...] A paradigm of social normality must, therefore, consist in culturally independent<br />

conditions that allow a society’s members to experience undistorted self-realization. [...] <strong>The</strong><br />

question then becomes crucial whether it is a communitarian form of ethical life, a distance-<br />

creating public sphere, non-alienated labor or a mimetic interaction with nature that enables<br />

individuals to lead a well-lived life(Axel Honneth, 2007, Disrespect, pp. 34, 35, 37).<br />

<strong>The</strong> patient of our time is less concerned with the state of his morals than that of his finances<br />

(Victor E. Frankl, 1967, Psychotherapy and Existentialism: Selected Papers on Logotherapy, p.<br />

112) .<br />

A dynamism would have been the norm and routine of our life. To tell you the truth, that<br />

spontaneous dynamism is the health of our life [...] With our sacred conservatism if we bound<br />

ourselves only to what is there then there would be lots of mud in the pond of our life. So there<br />

should be a continued process of cleaning up mud which means we would have to continuously<br />

widen the paths so that new streams of waters can enter there (Chitta Ranjan Das, 2010, Yoga<br />

513<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Samanyaya: Prabeshika, pp. 2-3).<br />

Introduction and Invitation<br />

Health and healing are perennial challenges of life but in modernity our approach to it is predominantly<br />

atomistic, reductionisitic and one-dimensional. We reduce the problems of health, ill-being and disease<br />

to individuals and do not relate to the wider environments of culture and society. We adopt a bio-medical<br />

approach to health and do not realize health as a multi-dimensional journey of wholeness which includes<br />

body, mind, soul, society, nature and cosmos. As Hans-George Gadamer (1996) challenges us in his <strong>The</strong><br />

Enigma of Health: <strong>The</strong> Art of Healing in a Scientific Age, we do not realize that health is something that<br />

cannot be simply made and produced. “Instead of being the result of manipulation or forceful intervention,<br />

our health is something that each and everyone of us take care through the way in which we lead our<br />

lives.” Our life is a journey of wholeness even when for existential reasons it is lived in parts. But when<br />

parts do not realize the integral connection among themselves, it creates a condition of pathology at the<br />

levels of self and society.<br />

A holistic engagement with health challenges us to realize that health is not just a matter of the individual.<br />

<strong>The</strong> health of an individual depends upon the health of a society as the illness of an individual is crucially<br />

shaped by the pathology of society. Unfortunately in sociology, social work and social welfare the<br />

discourse of social pathology has been replaced over the reigning discourse of social deviance which<br />

puts the blame squarely on the individual for his or her condition of disease and disruptive behaviour.<br />

Fortunately for us there is the rise of the discourse of social suffering in sociology, anthropology and social<br />

theorizing which seeks to relate social suffering and illness to wider systems of self, culture and society.<br />

Society as a Patient: With and Beyond Social Suffering and Social Pathology<br />

Recently scholars such as Pierre Bourdieu, Arthur Kleinman, Veena Das and John Clammer have<br />

challenged us to understand the work of social suffering (Bourdieu et al 1999; Clammer forthcoming;<br />

Kleinman et al. 1997). Before we discuss briefly this discourse of social suffering, it is helpful to relate<br />

this to the concept of society as the patient as it was articulated by Lawrence K. Frank a long time. In his<br />

initial essay on the subject and then the book with the same title, Frank challenges us to realize: “<strong>The</strong>re is<br />

a growing realization among thoughtful persons that our culture is sick, mentally disordered and in need<br />

of treatment. This belief finds expression in many different forms and from a variety of professions. [...]<br />

Anyone who reflects upon the present situation [...] cannot but fail to see that we have passed from the<br />

condition in which deviations from a social norm were to be regarded as abnormal. Today we have so<br />

many deviations and maladjustments that the term ‘abnormal’ has lost almost all significance” (Frank<br />

514


1933; also see Frank 1948).<br />

In his work, Frank challenges us to understand the shifting contours of social normality and abnormality.<br />

He also challenges us to realize how a particular organization of society makes society a patient. He<br />

suggests that “the competitive system and distortion created by the ineptness of our practices for<br />

socializing in the home and the school” makes society a patient (cf. Frank 1933). A system of society<br />

which produces large-scale poverty and impoverishment makes a society a patient. Without wholesale<br />

apriori characterization and condemnation, it is helpful to keep the concept of society as the patient as a<br />

work of investigation to find out what kind of organization and consciousness of society makes it a patient.<br />

In the contemporary Indian context, the persistence of caste discrimination and caste-based violence<br />

makes Indian society a patient. Similarly the reign of neo-liberalism with a brutal policy of extraction of<br />

resources for profit making and accompanying cut of expenditure on health care and social well-being<br />

makes many contemporary societies all over the world patients.<br />

In their work on social suffering, <strong>The</strong> Weight of the <strong>World</strong>: Social Suffering in Contemporary Societies,<br />

Pierre Bourdieu et al. tell us how societies are being made patient under a neo-liberal regime. <strong>The</strong>y also<br />

present us other instances of social suffering in their own society, i.e. France. In their collaborative work,<br />

<strong>The</strong> Weight of the <strong>World</strong>: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society, Pierre Bourdieu and his colleagues<br />

tell us about different ways in which social suffering is produced. In his essay, “<strong>The</strong> View from the State,”<br />

Patrick Champagne writes: “<strong>The</strong> ‘meditatization’ of ‘social malaises’ has the effect of proliferating all<br />

sorts of publications and reports to describe, explain and ‘treat’ these ‘malaises,’ so bringing them into<br />

the open” (Bourdieu et al. 1999, 213). About the way the school system produces outcastes, Bourdieu<br />

and Champagne write: “[...] the school system turns into a permanent home for potential outcasts” (ibid.,<br />

422). About the way social suffering creates wasted lives, Bourdieu writes: “Malik is 19 and has already<br />

‘lived a lot.’ When we met him he was doing—without many illusions—an unpaid internship, giving him<br />

minimal training, he had to find for himself to fulfil a poorly defined path of study at a nearby, low-ranked<br />

suburban high school” (ibid., 427). Bourdieu here points to institutionalized violence. He also speaks<br />

about “poisoned gifts”: “Superhighways that turn out to be dead-end streets” (ibid., 511). How with social<br />

suffering public streets become a desert street.<br />

Such an articulation of social suffering can be related to related reflections on these by psychologists,<br />

sociologists and philosophers. In his classic work on suffering and healing, Victor Frankl (1979) tells<br />

us about the collective neurosis of our times which has following main symptoms: a) an ephemeral<br />

attitude to life; b) the fatalist attitude toward life which “misinterprets and misrepresents man as a product<br />

515<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

of environment” (ibid., 115) 1 ; iii) “conformist or collectivist thinking” (ibid., 115); iv) denial of one’s<br />

own personality. For Frankl, the neurotic who suffers from the fourth symptom, fanaticism, denies the<br />

personality of others” (ibid., 116). For Frankl, “[...] all the four symptoms can be shown to derive from<br />

fear of and flight from freedom and responsibility; yet freedom and responsibility together make a man a<br />

spiritual being” (ibid., 117).<br />

Frankl’s pointer to issues of freedom and responsibility also remind us of the reflections of Eric Fromm<br />

who tells us how escape from freedom constitutes pathology of our times. To this problem of escape of<br />

freedom, we can also add the problem of escape from responsibility. Building a sane society challenges us<br />

to realize both freedom and responsibility and create an institutional and personal context for this. In this<br />

journey we can walk with both Gandhi and Emmanuel Levinas and strive to embody both freedom and<br />

responsibility which contributes to building a healthy self and healthy society.<br />

To these reflections on social pathology, we can also invite the insights of sociologist Richard Sennett and<br />

philosopher Soren Kierkegaard. In his <strong>The</strong> Corrosion of Character and other works, Sennett tells us how<br />

contemporary organization of work and time especially the valorization of “no long term” “corrodes trust,<br />

loyalty and mutual commitment (see Sennett 2000; also Sennett 2006 & 2012). Kierkegaard tells us about<br />

despair which constitutes a “Sickness unto Death” (1842). For Kierkegaard, “So to be sick unto death is,<br />

not to be able to die—yet not as though there were hope for life; no, the hopelessness in this case is that<br />

even the last hope, death, is not available. [...] So when the danger is so great that death has become one’s<br />

hope, despair is the disconsolateness of not being able to die” (1848, 345). Kierkegaard very insightfully<br />

links certain aspects of contemporary despair to the working of the state: “<strong>The</strong> minimum of despair is a<br />

state which (as one might humanly be tempted to express it) by reason of a sort of innocence does not<br />

even know that there is such a thing as despair. So when consciousness is at its minimum the despair<br />

is least [...]” (ibid., 348). Kierkegaard’s pointer to the working of the state in creating despair and then<br />

asserting that there is no such thing as despair can be understood the way modern state sees and ignores<br />

like a state and do not shed tears for this (cf. Scott 1998). State creates large-scale displacement but its<br />

conscience is least developed to acknowledge the pain and suffering created by the State.<br />

But while state creates despair, this condition of despair can also be transformed. In fact, creative selves,<br />

1 What Frankl writes here for depth psychology is relevant in all efforts in restoring health and healing in the face of such<br />

neurosis: A depth psychology which considers its main task to be that of ‘unmaking’ comes in most handy for the neurotic’s<br />

own tendency towards ‘devaluation’ (1967, 114). Depth psychology here has a spiritual dimension which can also<br />

become part of all work of restoration of generation of health and healing.<br />

516


association and social movements do transform such conditions of despair. <strong>The</strong>y seek to heal the wounds<br />

of self and society. This is both social healing and social therapy which calls for a new realization of<br />

meaning in the lives of individuals and societies. Frankl had spoken about logo therapy, a soulful therapy<br />

which can contribute to healing. We need an accompanying social logo therapy which can contribute to<br />

healing the wounds of society.<br />

Social Healing and the Calling of Metapathology<br />

Social suffering creates social pathology; society becomes a patient. But to transform social suffering we<br />

need transformative social actions, institutional transformation and transformation of what Bourdieu calls<br />

“institutional bad faith.” We also need creative suffering and voluntary suffering on the part of individuals<br />

and social institutions for transforming conditions of suffering. As Goethe had said a long time ago: “<strong>The</strong>re<br />

is no condition which cannot be ennobled either by a deed or by suffering” (quoted in Frankl 1967, 123;<br />

also see Murthy 1973, Toynbee 1948). While social suffering is produced by society, transformation of<br />

suffering calls for voluntary co-suffering on the part of both self and society. Gandhi, Victor Frankl and<br />

Chitta Ranjan Das have urged us to realize the significance of voluntary co-suffering for transforming<br />

suffering in the lives of both individuals and societies.<br />

<strong>The</strong> calling of voluntary co-suffering challenges us to transform an existent social distinction between<br />

normal and pathological. We know social and cultural movements challenge the existing definition of<br />

normality and pathology in the direction of dignity and co-realizations. Along with the work of socio-<br />

cultural and socio-spiritual movements, we also need creative self who can undertake suffering for<br />

the sake of realizing beauty, dignity and dialogues. <strong>The</strong>ir work may be considered pathological by<br />

others but this is not a normal and conventional pathology. This is metapathology as Abraham Maslow<br />

challenges us to realize. Transforming social pathology and social suffering are calling for embracing<br />

work of metapathology on the part of creative self, associations and social movements in a society. Such<br />

movements create a condition for fuller self, social and cultural realization on the part of participants (cf.<br />

Honneth 2007). While existing distinction of normality and pathology blocks fuller cultural realization, a<br />

voluntary embrace of metapathology creates a space and condition where self and society can fully realize<br />

themselves.<br />

This also creates condition for social healing. Social healing and social therapy calls for being together<br />

in vibrant communication and deep meditations and helping each other heal our wounds, listen to our<br />

stories and realize our potentials. It depends upon creating what Vygotsky had told a long time ago “zones<br />

of proximal development.” Recently Louis Holzman has insightfully applied Vygotosky’s insights and<br />

creates performative circles of social therapy where the participants become each other’s therapists, which<br />

517<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

goes beyond a dual model of the doctor and patient (cf. Holzman 2009). It is an instance of holistic and<br />

collaborative social therapy.<br />

Healing and the Challenges of Self and Social Transformations<br />

In the context of a perfected of killing where we kill not only reality but also possibility, we need a new art<br />

of healing which is multi-dimensional—political, spiritual, medicinal as well as meditative. In our society,<br />

the pursuit of a short-term time perspective and the work of what David Harvey (1989) calls “space-time<br />

compression.” Our contemporary organization of time creates anxiety and stress which are produced by<br />

structures of politics and economy so that we remain perpetually anxious and lose our spirit of creativity<br />

and resistance. A new art of healing has to address this question of temporality and create a new pregnant<br />

spatiality and temporality where we can breathe with ease and love and can give birth to each other and a<br />

new being and a new society (Giri 2012b).<br />

Health as a Journey of Wholeness<br />

Health is not just absence of disease; it involves an all around development of individual and society. 2<br />

Good health depends upon a good life and good society. While healing is both noun and verb, health is a<br />

noun. But for realization of health we need to realize it as simultaneously noun and verb. As a verb, health<br />

is not only activistic but also meditative. Realization of health depends upon both appropriate action and<br />

meditation. Action and meditation help us realize health as a continued journey of wholeness.<br />

In his work on health and healing, Hans-George Gadamer challenges us to realize and restore wholeness<br />

for the sake of health. Chitta Ranjan Das, a creative thinker from India, also presents us similar and added<br />

challenges. For Das (2010), realizing health is a continued journey of climbing towards peaks of self<br />

and society in the midst of disease, illness and ugliness of various kinds. For Das, to oppress others is a<br />

disease as it is to tolerate oppression. So for a healthy self and society, we would have to resist domination<br />

and oppression. A healthy person does not just adapt to society especially its systems of domination and<br />

disease; rather she tries to transform such conditions (see Giri 2012a). A healthy person does not betray<br />

himself and the potential of society which awaits a fuller realization.<br />

Resonating with the spirit of Lawrence Frank, Das raises a number of questions about wider structures of<br />

2 As the famous definition of health by <strong>World</strong> Health Organization states: “Health is a state of complete physical, mental<br />

and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.”<br />

518


society and modes of thinking which produce illness and social pathology. For Das, caste system and a<br />

sense of fatalism that one cannot change one’s fate contributes to production of illness and pathology in<br />

self and society. Similarly use of science and technology for profit making and warfare without concern<br />

for human well-being and social welfare contributes to production of social pathology. Das does not<br />

believe in an absolute distinction between health and disease as he challenges us to realize that every<br />

diseased person has a deeper yearning within himself or herself for being healthy. Similarly he challenges<br />

us to transform the one-sided hierarchical relationship between the doctor and patient. For Das, “One is<br />

not just either a patient or a doctor; it is not just the case that the doctor would prescribe and the patient<br />

would obey. Both have to listen to each other.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> reflections on Das and Gadamer on health and healing also remind us about the classic work of<br />

Alfred Korzybsky (1933) on science and sanity. For Korzybsky, “Until recently we have had a split<br />

medicine. One branch, general medicine, was interested in the ‘body’ (soma); the other was interested<br />

in the ‘soul’ (‘psyche’). <strong>The</strong> net result was that general medicine was a glorified form of veterinary<br />

science, while psychiatry remained metaphysical. However, it has been found empirically that a great<br />

many ‘physical’ ailments are of a semantogenic origin” (ibid.). Korzybsky pleads for an integration of<br />

the body and soul for realization of health. This also calls for a new grammar of life in which we realize<br />

health as simultaneously a noun and verb of action, meditation and transformations which includes both<br />

the horizontal and vertical dimensions of our lives, intension as well as extension. 3 It calls for a new art of<br />

integration (cf. Giri 2010).<br />

3 Earlier we have argued about the limits of the distinction between noun and verb. This also points to limits of existing<br />

modes of defining things. Korzybsky here challenges us to realize the distinction between definition by intension and<br />

definition by extension: “If we orient ourselves predominantly by intension or verbal definitions, our orientations depend<br />

mostly on the cortical region. If we orient ourselves by extension or facts, this type of orientation by necessity follows<br />

the natural order of evaluation, and involves thalamic factors, introducing automatically critically delayed reactions. In<br />

other words, orientations by intension tends to train our nervous system in a split between the functions of the cortical and<br />

thalamic regions; orientations by extension involves the integration of cortico-thalamic functions. Orientation by extension<br />

induce an automatic delay of reactions, which automatically stimulates the cortical region and regulates and protects<br />

the reactions of the usually over-stimulated thalamic region” (Korzybsky 1933, lviii). Korzybsky further writes: “I may<br />

add that all existing psychotherapy, no matter of what school, is based on the partial and particular extensionalization of a<br />

given patient” (ibid., lx).<br />

519<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

References<br />

Bourdieu, Pierre et al. 1999. <strong>The</strong> Weight of the <strong>World</strong>: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society.<br />

Cambridge: Polity Press.<br />

Das, Chitta Ranjan. 2010. Byakti O Byaktitya [Person and Personality]. Bhubaneswar: Pathika<br />

Prakashani.<br />

2011 Yoga Samanyaya: Prabeshika. Bhubaneswar: Pathika Prakashani.<br />

Clammer, John forthcoming. Culture, Development and Social <strong>The</strong>ory: Social Suffering and Alternative<br />

Discourses of Social Transformations. London: Zed.<br />

Giri, Ananta Kumar. 2010 “Towards a New Art of Integration.” Paper presented at the international<br />

symposium on “Learning across boundaries.” Luxemborg.<br />

2012a “Beyond Adaptation and Meditative Verbs of Co-Realizations.” In idem, Sociology and Beyond:<br />

Windows and Horizons. Jaipur: Rawat Publications.<br />

2012b “Towards a Vibrant and Pregnant Spatial and Temporal Creativity” Paper presented at Goethe<br />

Institute, Chennai, February 2012.<br />

Gadamer, Hans-George. 1996. <strong>The</strong> Enigma of Health: Art of Healing in a Scientific Age.<br />

Frank, Lawrence K. 1933. “Society as the Patient.” American Journal of Sociology.<br />

1948. Society as the Patient. Rutgers.<br />

Honneth, Axel. 2007. Disrespect: Normative Foundations of Critical <strong>The</strong>ory. Cambridge: Polity Press.<br />

Frankl, Victor. 1967. Psychotherapy and Existentialism: Selected Papers on Logotherapy.<br />

Hammondsworth: Penguin.<br />

Kierkegaard, Soren. 1989 [1848]. Sickness Unto Death. London: Penguin.<br />

Kleinman, Arthur, Veena Das and Margaret Lock (eds.). 1997. Social Suffering. Berkeley: University of<br />

California Press.<br />

Korzybsky, Afred. 1933. Science and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General<br />

Semantics. Lakeville, Connecticut: International Non-Aristotelian Library Publishing Co.<br />

Holzman, Lois. 2009. Vygotsky at Work and Play. London: Routledge.<br />

Murty, K. Satchidananda. 1973. <strong>The</strong> Realm of Between: Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion. Simla:<br />

Indian Institute of Advanced Study.<br />

Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have<br />

Failed. New Haven: Yale U. Press.<br />

Sennett, Richard. 2000. <strong>The</strong> Corrosion of Character: <strong>The</strong> Personal Consequences of Work in the New<br />

Capitalism. New Haven: Yale U. Press.<br />

2006. <strong>The</strong> Culture of New Capitalism. New Haven: Yale U. Press.<br />

2012. Together: <strong>The</strong> Rituals, Pleasures and Politics of Cooperation. New Haven: Yale U. Press.<br />

Toynbee, Alfred J. 1956. A Historian’s Approach to Religion. New York: Oxford U. Press.<br />

520


Princess Bari,<br />

Answering the Conundrum of Sufferings of the <strong>World</strong><br />

Kang Ha Yu<br />

Kangwon National University<br />

1. Rewriting Princess Bari in the 21 st Century<br />

In Korean shamanist rituals, or gut, there are those to lead the dead up to the heavens. <strong>The</strong>se are ‘Jinogi<br />

gut,’ ‘Ananpak gut,’ and ‘Ogu gut.’ In these rituals, the shaman sings and dances a Seosamuga, or an epic<br />

shamanist song, about Princess Bari. It is a shamanistic myth about a princess who was abandoned right<br />

after birth, coming back with the water of life obtained from the afterlife for her parents.<br />

Princess Bari is a song about a goddess, sung to pray for the souls of the dead and to comfort the living. It<br />

has been orally transmitted for a very long time. <strong>The</strong> story is reborn by Hwang Sokyong’s book, Princess<br />

Bari (Korean title: Baridegi) 1 . <strong>The</strong> writer kept the basic structure of the abandoned princess going into<br />

the afterlife, but added a new meaning of abandonment in the 21 st century. <strong>The</strong> new version is unique and<br />

different because it doesn’t repeat the original version, but encompasses the writer’s perception of reality<br />

in this world. 2<br />

Baridegi is a story about a girl named Bari. Regardless of her will, she travels from North Korea to China<br />

and then to the UK. <strong>The</strong> story tells of a girl’s experience of forced immigration in the midst of haughty<br />

capitalism and globalism, so the work has provided an important meaning in discussions regarding the<br />

1 Hwang Sokyong, Baridegi, Changbi, 2007.<br />

2 In Hwang Sokyong’s Shimchung, the Road of Lotus Flower, Hwang stated that “the perspective and the momentum of<br />

my book Shimchung is different from the perspective of Chae Mansik, when he newly wrote Shimhakgyu Jeon. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

are both based on the realities of the times when they were written.” (Hwang Sokyong, “Preface: Publishing the Revised<br />

Edition”, Shimchung, the Road of Lotus Flower, Munhakdongne, 2011, p. 696). Baridegi will also be the deep and honest<br />

thought on ‘now and here’ that the writer is in.<br />

521<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

current issues of the side effects of capitalism, immigration, and the diaspora. 3<br />

In Hwang’s book, Baridegi, all of the world’s sufferings caused by rapid globalization, such as violence,<br />

forced immigration, prejudice, misunderstanding, antagonism, conflict, poverty, and discrimination are<br />

included. <strong>The</strong> reason that this story is more than the sufferings of a girl named Bari is because the causes<br />

and the phenomena that make the characters suffer are not just individual issues. <strong>The</strong>y are all linked to the<br />

human society and the social institutions in a complex and multilayered way. 4 <strong>The</strong>refore, the sufferings<br />

experienced by Bari in Baridegi is an individual suffering, as well as the sufferings of all of us living in a<br />

divided, hurtful, confusing, and ironic world. And furthermore, it is the pains of all of us, ‘mankind,’ living<br />

in a huge society. This is why ‘we’ 5 must discuss pain and healing. This paper is not about a logical and<br />

scientific analysis on pain. It is about a story of a girl’s life, questioning the pains of human beings, who<br />

are relational beings as well as social beings.<br />

2. Bari, Traveling the Bitter <strong>World</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong>re are various similarities and differences between Seosamuga and Hwang’s Baridegi. Among the<br />

differences, just looking at the amount written about the current life and the afterlife, descriptions of the<br />

current life takes up a bigger portion in Baridegi. In the myth, Bari’s childhood, the ten or so years she<br />

spent growing up with Birigongduk grandparents, is quite short. However, with the help of the writer’s<br />

imagination, that period is reborn as a long journey across North Korea, China and the UK.<br />

Unlike other studies, which mainly covers Bari’s journey in the current life, this paper aims to look over<br />

the afterlife portion of the journey, which is comparatively shorter than the current life part of the story.<br />

However, the afterlife that Bari travels is a rendition of what today’s people think of the afterlife. 6 So, even<br />

if we cover the story about the afterlife, it is inevitably a story about today’s world. <strong>The</strong>refore, the journey<br />

3 <strong>The</strong>re are so many studies about Hwang’s Baridegi with the words ‘diaspora’ and ‘immigration’ in their titles. This paper<br />

will not list the studies.<br />

4 “Grouping human issues into groups make us realize that these phenomena cannot be regarded as psychological or<br />

medical issues, therefore ‘personal’ issues. On the other hand, it shows that in many cases, personal issues are closely<br />

linked to social issues.” Arthur Klienman, Veena Das, translated by Ahn, Jongseol, Social Suffering, Greenbee, 2002, p.<br />

10.<br />

5 <strong>The</strong> word ‘we,’ is a concept that can be easily fabricated and falsified, “from the closest relationships like family and<br />

friends, to encompass states and companies” (Seo Kyungsik, Can Sufferings and Memory Bond, Chulsoo and Younghee,<br />

2009, p 53-54). <strong>The</strong> word ‘we’ in this paper is a macro and inclusive term, which goes beyond the barriers of state,<br />

ethnicity, and race.<br />

6 “‘Oh, it is horrible.’ Chilsung thinks. ‘That is the hell that you built in your world. That is why the same hell is here as<br />

well.’” Hwang Sukyong, Baridegi, p. 267.<br />

522


into the afterlife is a recreation of today’s world. So it could be a clearer method to look into the current<br />

life.<br />

As Bari in the Seosamuga did, Bari in the novel is born as the seventh daughter in a family living in<br />

Chungjin, North Korea, and is immediately abandoned after birth. After being rescued by a white dog<br />

raised by the family, Bari lived without any difficulties for a while. However, due to economic and<br />

political reasons, the family is separated. Bari and her grandmother secretly crossed the river and went in<br />

to China. In China, her sister, Hyuni and her grandmother suddenly die. After their death, thanks to the<br />

help of a man named Miccuri, she goes to a massage parlor named Nakwon (Korean word for paradise).<br />

In Nakwon, she befriends a girl named Shang. With the help of the Shang couple, she moves to Dalian<br />

and seems like her happiness is just beginning. However, she comes across some money issues again, and<br />

against her will, she is illegally smuggled into the UK. After working at a diner in Chinatown, she works<br />

as a foot masseuse at Tonking Salon. She meets Ali, a muslim, gets married to him, and finally feels that<br />

her life will be happy from then on. However, her husband Ali goes to look for his brother who is involved<br />

in an international terrorist act and Bari has to raise her child alone.<br />

Unlike the original story where Bari dramatically meets her parents who abandoned her, and goes to<br />

the afterlife for her parents, Bari in the novel is abandoned repeatedly. She is abandoned at birth, again<br />

with the death of her grandmother, and again when she is separated from Shang, her only friend, after<br />

smuggling into Britain. After her marriage, she is abandoned again by her husband as he leaves her to look<br />

for his brother Usman. She is tragically abandoned in the world again as her baby dies in an accident.<br />

(1) <strong>The</strong> Road to the Afterlife, the Familiar Journey<br />

She was named ‘Bari’ because she was abandoned at birth. Like her name, she repeatedly suffers the<br />

pains of ‘abandonment’ as if it were her destiny. At the end of increasing pain is the journey into the<br />

afterlife. In the myth, Princess Bari embarks on the journey after reuniting with her parents. She receives<br />

much cheering and farewell as she goes, 7 but in the novel, Bari begins her journey in a most painful<br />

moment. She had cried herself to sleep after losing her daughter, Holiya, whom she gave birth to without<br />

her husband. At her lowest, most humble and painful moment, Bari’s journey begins. After repeated<br />

abandonment and pain, what awaits her is the most difficult journey: a journey into the afterlife.<br />

7 “<strong>The</strong> King gave Princess Bari huge jade, silk clothes, smooth bamboo hat, and a jar, shoes and a walking stick made out<br />

of casting iron.” Kim Taegon, Choi Unsik, and Kim Jinyoung, Korean Myths, Siinsa, 2009, p. 229. Moved by the reunion<br />

with her parents and after reconciling with her parents, Princess Bari embarks on her journey receiving all the necessities.<br />

However, the situation is exactly the opposite for Bari. She embarks on her journey without anything.<br />

523<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

In the myth, Princess Bari had to go though many hells. 8 Likewise, Bari must go through multiple layers<br />

of hell. With the help of grandmother and Chilsung, she arrives at the watchtower of a ship. From there,<br />

she sees that she must go through three seas of hell, the sea of fire, sea of blood, and sea of sand, to get to<br />

Mushei Castle, at the end of the western sky. 9 <strong>The</strong> hell that reflects, projects, and compresses the human<br />

world shows that the sufferings of this world are that much complex and multi-layered.<br />

<strong>The</strong> sea of fire, which she crosses first, shows the world’s war and carnage through burning cities and<br />

people. War is the most violent act. It is the act that destroys human beings, families, the world, and<br />

civilizations 10 . That is the true nature of the sea of fire.<br />

After the sea of fire is the sea of blood. It is where boats filled with the souls of the dead float by. It makes<br />

us think of the meaning of pain and death. People who cannot enter the afterlife cry in pain on their way to<br />

the afterlife. <strong>The</strong>y are on different boats according to the different pains they have suffered. It is here that<br />

Bari meets the most number of people. It shows that there are more than one or two different types of pain.<br />

That there are a more diverse and complex causes and shapes of pain. At the sea of blood, symbolizing<br />

both life and death, Bari meets the first boat passing by.<br />

Scenes change relentlessly. It shows here and there inside the ship. Negroids, Caucasians, and<br />

Mongoloids are all on the boat. It is a ship filled with souls who starved to death, fell ill to death,<br />

harassed to death, worked to death, beaten to death, exploded to death, burned to death, drowned to<br />

death, and overanxious to death (Hwang, 268).<br />

A soul that died painfully asks Bari “Please answer me quickly. Why are we in so much pain? Why are<br />

we here?” (Hwang, 268). However, Bari, even though she is a living soul, does not know the meaning.<br />

Looking at the painfully dying souls, she does not hastily say or criticize that it is all their faults. This is<br />

possible because Bari herself has been through so much pain. Bari has a special psychic gift of being able<br />

to travel to the afterlife, but she does not have the power to save them. Listening to their painful cries and<br />

questions, she continues her journey, only answering them that she will tell them on the way back.<br />

On the second boat crossing the sea of blood, there are the lost souls of the people sacrificed voluntarily<br />

8 “<strong>The</strong>re were blade mountain hell, fire mountain hell, poisonous snake hell, ice hell, pitfall hell, baeam hell, and gate hell.”<br />

Kim Taegon, Choi Unsik, and Kim Jinyoung, Korean Myths, p. 230.<br />

9 “‘First is the sea of fire, then the sea of blood. Last is the sea of sand, where even a bird’s feather sinks. After you pass<br />

that, is the Mushei Castle.’ ‘Where is that?’ ‘<strong>The</strong> end of western sky.’” Hwang Sokyong, Baridegi, p. 266.<br />

10 “War is the biggest and most brutal violence of all. It is because it destroys human, families, nations, and cultures that<br />

man made.” Kim Chisoo, Wounds and Healing, Moonji Publishing, 2010, p. 36.<br />

524


and involuntarily under the guise of world justice and peace. Ali’s brother Usman, who was involved in an<br />

international terrorist act, is also on that boat.<br />

On the boat are people lined up holding spears, arrows, swords and guns. <strong>The</strong>re are also people<br />

with their hair everywhere. Some lost their arms, legs, or neck. <strong>The</strong>y wore bloodied uniforms, with<br />

bandages, prosthetics, and eye patches. <strong>The</strong>ir arms are outstretched, flailing.<br />

Usman in a white and round hat with beard yells at me.<br />

Bari, tell me why evil prevails in the world, and why we are with our enemies (Hwang, 269).<br />

On the boat are people with swords, spears, guns, and other weapons, and the people who have been<br />

hurt by them. Also, enemies who fought against each other were on the boat together. <strong>The</strong>y ask Bari<br />

why evil always wins and why the enemies are on the same boat. Usman asks Bari a question, but Bari<br />

only answers that she will give them an answer on her way back. <strong>The</strong> third boat crossing the sea of river<br />

appears.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are young and old men with beards and stern faces and women wearing hijabs with<br />

concerned faces. <strong>The</strong>re are also women with faces distorted from fire and with bodies filled with<br />

bloody scars and bruises from flogging, women wearing loose clothes covering their faces with<br />

burka, and strange men with bombs on their chests. <strong>The</strong>y shake their fists and ask Bari. Tell us<br />

what the meaning of our deaths is! […] I will answer you on my way back (Hwang, 270).<br />

This is the pain of the victims of violence under the guise of tradition and justice. Women wearing hijabs<br />

and burkas, women flogged for violating tradition, women who lost their lives from honorary killing, and<br />

men who have killed those women due to wrong beliefs all cry out in pain. <strong>The</strong> cause of their pains is not<br />

individual. It must be seen from a more macro perspective. It is caused by culture and tradition in a world<br />

that we shared for a long time. Bari still cannot answer their questions.<br />

While seeing the boats pass by, Bari does not answer any of their questions. On the last boat crossing the<br />

sea of blood, she sees the people who have hurt her.<br />

In the quietness, Bari hears a creepy laughter. He he he, ha ha ha. Officials who took away her<br />

father, men who drove her away from home, men who have sold and harassed Bari’s sister, Mii,<br />

who crossed the Tumen River alone, gamblers from Dalian, and men from the boat that she<br />

smuggled into the UK are all on the boat. […] Ah, most of all, the scary and ugly Shang is glaring<br />

at me. On this boat are the things that you hate the most. When will we be free? […] I will never set<br />

you free. […] When will we free from you? […] I will tell you on my way back (Hwang, 270-271).<br />

525<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

On the last question, Bari finally answers that she will never let them go. It is because even though she is<br />

a psychic, she is also only a human, not free from the bonds of hate and resentment. However, to the next<br />

question asking when they will be freed, she answers that she will tell them on her way back.<br />

While crossing the sea of blood, Bari receives four questions. She is a psychic, but she is incapable of<br />

solving her own pains, and answering others’ questions. Even though she can see the afterlife, in the<br />

face of the universal, somber and solemn question of life and death, Bari cannot give any answers. To<br />

the people who cry out in wanting to know the meaning of life and death, Bari does not act in a solemn<br />

and domineering way. On the other hand, she listens and tells them that if she finds the answers, she will<br />

let them know. Even to the people who have sold her and hurt her, she first cries out that she will never<br />

forgive them, but in the end, she unconsciously tells them that she will let them know later.<br />

Like so, hell is a familiar road, filled with people she has met before during her current life. Even though<br />

they are already dead, the dead souls on the boats crossing the sea of blood do not know the meaning<br />

of death. It must be because they did not know the meaning of life, which is connected to death. Where<br />

would she find the answers to the souls’ questions?<br />

(2) <strong>The</strong> Familiar Taste of the Water of Life<br />

Bari promises the souls that she will find the answers to their questions and continues on her journey. She<br />

is a psychic who knows the past and the present of a person by touching their feet. She is a being who<br />

understands the unknown afterlife, but the writer holds off finding the answers in the holy world, or the<br />

godly world. This is expressed in the novel by Bari being unable to see the future even though she can see<br />

the past and the present. Also, it is expressed in the criticism on the religious leaders she meets on the sea<br />

of sand.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is something moving far away. <strong>The</strong>y wear different clothes and hold up different scriptures.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Protestant minister in black suits and tie, Catholic priest with a long black gown, a Hindu<br />

Brahman wrapped in white clothing with one bear shoulder, a Muslim imam with long clothes and<br />

a white hat, a Buddhist monk with shaved head and yellow cloth, and a Jewish rabbi with a black,<br />

round kippa hat all barely standing on the sand and screaming in undistinguishable words. […]<br />

<strong>The</strong>y are screaming at the top of their lungs, but because they are trying to out scream each other,<br />

the words are all mixed, and do not mean anything (Hwang, 272).<br />

<strong>The</strong> writer criticizes all religions’ fallacy in that they all speak solemnly about life and death and proclaim<br />

salvation, but in the end, they do not accept one another and repeat division and quarrels. All the religions<br />

526


in the world that sink into the sea of sand and rises back up again do not have any answers to the world’s<br />

conflict and pain. By putting the religious people, filled with fallacies, hypocrisy and arrogance but<br />

pretend to be solemn, on the sea of sand, on the way to hell, the writer draws a line to religious salvation<br />

and holy salvation.<br />

Bari, a psychic, is no exception. Bari has the ability to talk to Sook, who is a mute, and to her dog,<br />

Chilsung, and can see the past of a person by touching their feet. However, she does not know her future,<br />

or give answers to the questions asked by people crying out in pain. Instead of sermons, advice, and<br />

proclamations of teachings, Bari stands at the other end of the line. Bari reads the low points and the pains<br />

in a person’s life and mind by touching their tired and dirty feet as a foot masseuse. She does not rule or<br />

stand in front of people. With that ability, she stays at the lowest, the dirtiest place. <strong>The</strong>refore, Bari does<br />

not act as if she ‘knows’ everything about human pain and salvation, but shares with people by exposing<br />

her ignorance to the world’s pain.<br />

Bari crosses the sea of fire, blood, and sand receiving heaps of questions about pain. <strong>The</strong>n, she reaches<br />

Mushei Castle at the end of the western sky. She asks Satan, disguised as an old man, about the Water of<br />

Life. He answers weakly, “It is impossible that such a thing exists. We do have a well, but it is just water<br />

to make food” (Hwang, 280). That was the disappointing answer she received after going through all the<br />

troubles to come to Mushei Castle.<br />

Bari turns and walks out the back door of the room. At the end of the stairs, there is a small garden<br />

and a small well. She ran towards the well and drinks up the water with her hands a couple of<br />

times. It tastes cool and sweet like her well back home. But that is it. Disappointed, I get up<br />

(Hwang, 280).<br />

Bari stands up ‘disappointed’ after drinking the water from the well that tastes like the water back home.<br />

She had expected the Water of Life to be something special, but unlike Princess Bari in the myth, there<br />

was no Water of Life that she could proudly carry back.<br />

On her way back, she meets the first, grey boat. People ask her the question once again. Against her will,<br />

a young girl’s voice answers the question. To the question asked by the bitter souls of all races, a voice<br />

within Bari answers.<br />

It is because of the desires of human beings. To eat better, wear better, and live better, they harassed<br />

us. That is why the god riding the boat with you is also in pain. Forgiving them will be helping god<br />

(Hwang, 282).<br />

527<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

A girl’s voice comes out from within Bari, who drank the Water of Life, which is just normal water. <strong>The</strong><br />

voice says that the cause of the pain is desire, and forgiveness is the answer. On her way back, Bari meets<br />

people on the second boat, including Usman.<br />

Do you know why evil always wins? Why we are here together with our enemies? Nobody is a<br />

winner in a war. <strong>The</strong> definition of the current life is always in half (Hwang, 282).<br />

Wars began with a good cause: to eradicate evil and to pursue a just and peaceful world. However,<br />

in trying to create a peaceful world with violence, they only created consumptive fights and victims.<br />

No matter what just causes it has, violence only begets more violence, and it does not solve anything.<br />

Usman’s question of why only evil prevails in the world stems from a mindset of putting good and bad in<br />

a conflicting manner. On the flip side, the enemy will repeat the same mindset from the opposite position,<br />

so a solution seems far away. This is why Usman and his enemies are on the same boat. Identifying friend<br />

or foe makes us to define each other as enemies, others, and evil. If friends are absolute good and foes<br />

are absolute evil, all fights will end with ‘evil’s victory.’ Bari’s answer that no one wins in a war and that<br />

justice in the world is only an imperfect half and means that as long as inconsiderate and narrow-minded<br />

division exists, there is no true victory in the world.<br />

As dividing becomes more dense, pain grows and maximizes. Clearly dividing friend and foe might<br />

dissect the world, but can’t put the world back together. Human desire and greed that pry in that boundary<br />

only make that line more distinct.<br />

Next comes the boat with women in hijabs and burkas, women flogged to death, honor killed women, and<br />

men with bombs on their chests. On that boat are many people sacrificed under the name of man-made<br />

‘tradition’ and ‘justice.’<br />

Tell us the meaning of our death!<br />

God’s sadness is because of your despair. He will not be in despair with you (Hwang, 283).<br />

Bari answers that it is because of the forced submission that has been going on so long that no one knows<br />

it is wrong, tradition that does not change because sometimes it is similar to beliefs, and despair arising<br />

from walls such as culture and prejudice. Bari learns from her ‘daily life’ that they can be saved from<br />

despair when they recognize and consider others. 11 <strong>The</strong> wall that has been built for a long time is so strong<br />

11 “Mr. Tan from Tonking Salon believed in Buddhism. Mr. Lou would murmur a mantra-like prayer endlessly when he<br />

was resting after cooking. Many people living in Chinatown went to Taoist temples to burn incense and pray. Luna and<br />

528


that people give up. But if human beings give into despair, god will not be able to do anything and be<br />

filled with sadness. It is because god can help man, but living is one’s own job.<br />

Next is the quiet fourth boat. On that boat are the people who have hurt Bari. Shang, who made Bari’s<br />

daughter Holiya Sooni die is also on that boat. <strong>The</strong> boat filled with people who Bari hated is still tied to<br />

Bari with hate. Inside Bari’s hurting mind, Holiya’s voice answers for her.<br />

<strong>The</strong> things you hate the most are on this boat. When will we be freed?<br />

My mom is tied. When my mom untangles herself from hate, you will be freed (Hwang, 284).<br />

Through the voice inside of her, she faces the truth behind hate. 12 She is a psychic who can go from the<br />

current life to the afterlife. But she realizes that even she is not a perfect being, and that she is only a<br />

person consumed in hate and despair. <strong>The</strong> pain inside her is not reverted to her personal fault. On the other<br />

hand, it is pain of an individual left in a world filled with global capitalism, racial hostility, and religious<br />

conflict. Bari’s experience of human trafficking, the September 11 th terrorist attack, the London subway<br />

terrorist bombing, and even Holiya’s death is not because of her own fault. In a world where we do not<br />

live alone, we are all victims and perpetrators.<br />

Pain is caused by personal faults as well as societal pain from war, religious conflicts and terrorism<br />

arising from intangible things such as hate, conflict, and prejudice rampant all over the world. <strong>The</strong>refore,<br />

the faults of a man in a world cannot be blamed only on him, and the society that allows existence is not<br />

innocent. Pain is both personal and universal.<br />

Bari found the Water of Life at the end of the dangerous road that she went holding bells and tri-colored<br />

sprays. <strong>The</strong> Water of Life was just normal water that we cook with and wash our clothes with. It is<br />

daily life itself. Water of Life is the water from the well of everyday life filled with pain. <strong>The</strong> deep and<br />

encompassing healing power of the Water of Life is told by Bari’s grandmother.<br />

When I asked for the Water of Life, the Jangseung (Korean totem pole) told me that the water that<br />

we use to cook and wash clothes, that water is the Water of Life. […] When I sprayed the Water of<br />

Life that I brought, my sick parents got well and the sick world was healed (Hwang, 81).<br />

Mrs. Sarah were from Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, but they were born in Britain. <strong>The</strong>y went to church and believed in<br />

Jesus. <strong>The</strong>y freely crossed over different manners and courtesies according to their traditions.” Hwang, Baridegi, p. 225.<br />

12 “Shang, you bitch! I will kill you. I later realized that Shang had only provoked something in my heart. <strong>The</strong> grudge was<br />

about everything that had hurt me throughout my journey.” Hwang Sokyong, Baridegi, p. 262.<br />

529<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

<strong>The</strong> Water of Life that Bari drank heals not only her ‘father’s’ illness and brings him back to life, but also<br />

the Water of Life that heals the world. She could not bring back the Water of Life which creates bones<br />

and flesh and lets the blood flow. But by drinking it and becoming one with it, she is able to answer the<br />

souls’ questions. Could we say that the questions we ask during our lives and the sufferings of life are less<br />

painful than the physical pain of bones and flesh falling apart and blood drying up?<br />

<strong>The</strong> fact that the Water of Life was just normal water means that the answers to the questions on our pain<br />

are not in books or learned from scholars. It is earned by ourselves, in our lives, while we ask the questions<br />

to ourselves. <strong>The</strong> world we live in is painful like hell, but the water that brings back life to people and the<br />

world is in our lives.<br />

(3) Wounded Healer<br />

Although the depth might differ, pain is indiscriminate to all beings. It is universal in the sense that all<br />

people go through it, and it is the most unique emotion in the sense that it is an experience that we cannot<br />

explain vividly to anyone. 13 <strong>The</strong> people from all ranks and classes, races, and ethnicities that Bari met<br />

were not free from pain. <strong>The</strong> pain is caused by individual fault, but pain is also our destiny in the sense<br />

that we all live in complex relations and societies. Bari had experienced indiscriminate and merciless pain<br />

since birth, so she gladly begs for others’ pain.<br />

Help Mrs. Emily.<br />

I said quietly. Becky answered in a hoarse voice.<br />

You are not in a position to worry about others (Hwang, 239).<br />

Deep pain and sorrow not only makes us fall into the depths of a bottomless pit. By experiencing pain<br />

with all our body, we earn the healing power that can be understood and can console others, and we<br />

become immune to pain. Immunity to pain is earned through pain. Why did the writer put Bari in the<br />

epicenter of pain and sufferings? <strong>The</strong> writer said, “Shamans sang the pains and sufferings that Bari, the<br />

original shaman, experienced. By doing this, they considered themselves as ‘tortured healer of pain’ or<br />

‘suffering solver of sufferings.’” 14<br />

13 “Suffering, in other words is experiencing life and death which means that ‘we exist among people.’ It is subjective and<br />

at the same time, far apart from the world of matters and men.” Hannah Arendt, trans. Lee Jinwoo and Tae Jungho, <strong>The</strong><br />

Human Condition, p. 104. “Experiencing physical pain that is so strong that it makes us forget about everything else it<br />

the most intimate feeling. It is a feeling that we cannot tell anyone else.” Arthur Klienman and Veena Das, trans. Ahn<br />

Jongseol, Social Suffering, p. 25.<br />

14 Hwang, Baridegi, p. 294.<br />

530


Bari goes beyond the pains to console and embrace the wounds. But Bari is only a human being, filled<br />

with scars herself. She gave birth to her only child, Holiya, without her husband in a foreign land. But<br />

her daughter dies suddenly, and she is abandoned in the lowest depths of the world. It is then that Bari<br />

asks, “God, why are you making me suffer, when I have done nothing wrong? What difference does it<br />

make when I have faith and is dependent?” (Hwang, 263). <strong>The</strong> question that Bari asked, “Why me?,” is a<br />

question we have all asked in our lives. It is the cry against repeating pain that we experience even though<br />

we live diligently, hard, and have done nothing wrong. It is also the cries of the people living in the era of<br />

pain.<br />

After listening to Bari’s story, the old Abdul consoles Bari by telling his story. He tells Bari that after<br />

seeing his innocent wife and children being shot to death, he resented god. 15 He also says that misfortunes<br />

and pains are the outcomes of ‘our’ deeds. 16 <strong>The</strong> pains and sufferings in life are there for ‘us’ to lead<br />

excellent lives. 17 <strong>The</strong> answer that it is ‘our’ fault means that not only individuals, but also the human<br />

relations and the society all are responsible. At the same time, it is the writer’s request to widen our<br />

perspectives from ‘me’ to ‘us.’ That is why the writer proposes global citizenship as the answer, which<br />

transcends race, ethnicity, and nation. This work is meaningful in that it globalizes Korean literature,<br />

but all the more meaningful is that it sees the world in a macro view, and it voluntarily joins in with the<br />

pains of the world. Breaking down barriers and wounded healer Bari’s difficult journey to hell, are the<br />

consolations and compassion for all the suffering people. It is also the writer’s hope that ‘we’ who drink<br />

the Water of Life every day, take on the role of the wounded healer.<br />

3. New Identity of ‘Global Citizen’<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is no such thing as Water of Life<br />

Ha ha ha. Stupid, the water that you drink is the Water of Life.<br />

No one can bring back the Water of Life. 18<br />

15 “I resented god as I left Jammu and Kashmir after my wife and daughters were executed. How could he give so much<br />

pain to such good people! But anyone with flesh, all throughout his/her life, already experiences hell. Hatred is the hell<br />

that you build.” Hwang, Baridegi, p. 263.<br />

16 “Continued human interest on each incident that arise among people shows us that in defining human, sufferings are<br />

fundamentally ‘social.’ Also, observing the diversity of human society conjures up an existential reverberation that all<br />

pain takes up a part of ‘our’ world.” Arthur Klienman and Veena Das, trans. Ahn Jongseol, Social Suffering, p. 25.<br />

17 “God’s nature is to watch. <strong>The</strong>re is no color, share, laughter, tears, sleep, oblivion, star, or end, but is everywhere.<br />

Misfortune and pain is everything we have done. <strong>The</strong> ups and downs are there to teach us to lead excellent lives. That is<br />

why we must overcome them and enjoy the beauties of life. That is what god wants from us.” Hwang, Baridegi, p. 263.<br />

18 Hwang, Baridegi, p. 280.<br />

531<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

When Bari is disappointed after knowing that there is no such thing as the Water of Life, the black crow<br />

that showed her the way laughs and tells her that the water she drank and was disappointed in, the water<br />

with the cool and sweet taste like the water home, that is the Water of Life. <strong>The</strong> Bari in the myth who<br />

carefully brings home the Water of Life is nonexistent in the novel. <strong>The</strong> Water of Life goes inside Bari<br />

and becomes one with her. <strong>The</strong> Water of Life that the writer writes does not exist apart from us. It gains<br />

its meaning and strength when it becomes one with us. Bari is the psychic who connects the living and<br />

the dead, and the current life and the afterlife. She became a true ‘healer’ because she has experienced the<br />

lowest points of life, been through the deepest, most excruciating pain, and cried for her and others.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y say that life is bitter. But is it only bitter? We need immunity in life. That immunity isn’t brought by<br />

someone else. Like Bari, it is earned by experiencing pain. Also, like Bari’s grandmother and the Satan in<br />

the Mushei Castle said, the Water of Life is the ordinary water we cook and wash our clothes with. <strong>The</strong><br />

answers to our pain are in our lives. It is the endless questions, reflections, soul-searching, and insights on<br />

our lives that make the Water of Life.<br />

<strong>The</strong> endless pain that the North Korean defector Bari experiences on her journey from North Korea to<br />

China and to the UK tells us that the fundamental cause of that pain doesn’t bud from individual issues.<br />

<strong>The</strong> writer says that the world that we must pursue goes beyond the barriers of nationalism and patriotism.<br />

It is a world where all people are considered and cared for. <strong>The</strong> identity of the people living in that world<br />

is ‘Global Citizen.’ 19<br />

Hwang took out the traditional meaning of ‘filial piety’ from the Seosamuga Princess Bari. In that<br />

place, Hwang is proposing a new story of the birth of the ‘global citizen.’ In traditional society, ‘filial<br />

piety’ goes beyond the unilinear perspective of saving a sick father. It has a bigger meaning that sustains<br />

families and communities. <strong>The</strong> global citizenship that the North Korean defector Bari conveys also has a<br />

similar meaning. She contemplates personal pain and understands the pain of others. This creates a more<br />

expansive and flexible human community, world of reconciliation and forgiveness, and an ‘orderly, whole<br />

world.’ 20<br />

19 (Hwang Sokyong, interview) “<strong>The</strong>re is no such thing as a globally shared ‘literary trend.’ Sharing the current life of<br />

ourselves and the Korean peninsula with the people around the world is the writer’s road to become a ‘global citizen,’<br />

free of national borders or nationalities.” Hwang Sokyong, “Overcoming Conflict and Antagonism, to find the Water of<br />

Life in the 21 Century”, Baridegi, p. 298.<br />

20 “In a person’s life, the feeling that the world completes something whole with orders is a prerequisite for happiness.”<br />

Kim Uchang, “Globalization and Universal Ethics: Acceptance, Rights, Cultural Values”, <strong>The</strong> 1 st <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong><br />

<strong>Forum</strong> Proceedings, 2011, p. 3.<br />

532


A society without alienation, discrimination, and pain was never realized. Utopia might still be a faraway<br />

dream in the future. However, “there are more humane and less humane societies.” 21 Whichever it is, if<br />

it is the world where person, who are destined to be social and relational, must live in, pain is inevitable.<br />

<strong>The</strong> meaning of ‘global citizen’ proposed by the writer goes beyond the meaning of a citizen living in a<br />

world. It is born in a world where the barriers of ethnicity, race, and national borders are broken down.<br />

As society’s civilization develops, the distinction between friend and foe takes place more often. As that<br />

distinction becomes clearer, pain will increase. Breaking down the myriad of borders, differences, and<br />

discriminations is not proposed by an individual. It must become a type of public opinion cultivated by all<br />

global citizens. 22 Only when an individual gains dignity as a human being, and not from the identity built<br />

by gender, nationality, and ethnicity, he/she gains the ability to understand the pain of others, who have an<br />

equal value of life as anyone.<br />

It is not because Bari is a psychic with special talents that she crossed the river of pain. Bari’s psychic<br />

ability is shown when she empathizes with and understands the pain of others. <strong>The</strong> answer to the pain<br />

that we have because we are relational, social, and global beings is the ‘dailiness’ of the Water of Life that<br />

heals us. That daily life will become the world where the concept of ‘we’ is infinitely expanded. <strong>The</strong>refore,<br />

we must earn a new identity of a global citizen, which transcends ethnicity, race, nationality, gender, and<br />

age.<br />

<strong>The</strong> pain and conflict of the people Bari met at the sea of blood are created by different causes, such<br />

as conflict, desire, selfishness, and hate. From those emotions, war, terrorism, forced immigration,<br />

discrimination and violence arise. <strong>The</strong>y have different names and forms, but they are all pains. A bigger<br />

problem is that this pain not only sickens an individual, but also sickens all social beings, societies, and<br />

civilizations. Though it is true that we must try and seek social and scientific analyses, and ultimately,<br />

solutions to the primal causes of pain and sufferings of humanity, we must always keep in mind that<br />

reflection on the values of each and every human being should be the foundation upon which harmonious<br />

and peaceful community is built upon; a humanity for reconciliation and healing.<br />

What can the humanities do for the world’s pains? Literature is one branch of the humanities. It holds in<br />

the stories of the people in the world. It helps people to have a wider perspective of the world by viewing<br />

21 Kim Uchang, Freedom and Humane Life, Thinking Tree Publishing, 2007, p. 16.<br />

22 Arendt, said that “education, ingenuity, and talent cannot replace the compositional factors of public opinion. Public<br />

opinion is the adequate place for human excellence.” Hannah Arendt, trans. Lee Jinwoo and Tae Jungho, <strong>The</strong> Human<br />

Condition, p. 102. Human excellence is not something that is individual. It must be agreed and understood by everyone,<br />

something that can create cooperation.<br />

533<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

the status and relationships of many beings in a macro way. It is a made up story, but there is truth about<br />

the world and life in literature. This is why we read a fake, made up, imagined, and trivial story. 23<br />

References<br />

Hwang, Sokyong, Baridegi, Changbi, 2007.<br />

Hwang, Sokyong, Shimchung Munhakdongne, 2011.<br />

Kim, Chisoo, Wounds and Healing, Moonbi Publishing, 2010.<br />

Kim, Taegon; Choi, Unsik; Kim, Jinyoung, Korean Myths Siinsa, 2009.<br />

Arendt, Hannah; translated by Lee, Jinwoo; Tae, Jungho, <strong>The</strong> Human Condition, Hankilsa, 2008.<br />

Cassirer, Ernst, An Essay on Man, Chang, 2008.<br />

Klienman, Arthur; Das, Veena; translated by Ahn, Jongseol, Social Suffering: Socialistic, Medical, and<br />

Cultural Anthropological Approach to Human Suffering Greenbee, 2002.<br />

Suh, Kyungsik, Can Sufferings and Memory Bond, Chulsoo and Younghee, 2009.<br />

Kim, Uchang, Freedom and Humane Life, Thinking Tree Publishing, 2007.<br />

Kim, Uchang, “Globalization and Universal Ethics: Acceptance, Rights, Cultural Values”, 1 st <strong>World</strong><br />

<strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong> Proceedings 2011.<br />

Park, Seunghee, ‘Method of Bonding between Ethnicity and the <strong>World</strong> – “<strong>The</strong> case of Hwang, Sokyong’s<br />

Baridegi”, Hanminjok Eomunhak (Vol. 77), 2010.<br />

Yoo, Kyungsoo, “Diaspora’s Imagination for Multifaceted Communication – <strong>The</strong> case of Hwang,<br />

Sokyong’s Baridegi”, Comparative Korean Studies (Vol. 17), 2009.<br />

Kim, Heonseon, “Comparative Research on Goddesses Travelling the Afterlife – Princess Bari,<br />

Tentyuhime, Inanna”, Comparative Folk Culture Studies (Vol.33), 2007.<br />

Park, Junggeun, “Princess Bari-type of Vision in a Multicultural Society Caused by Diaspora – <strong>The</strong> case<br />

of Hwang, Sokyong’s Baridegi” <strong>The</strong> Review of Korean Cultural Studies (Vol.31), 2009.<br />

Lee, Myungwon, “<strong>The</strong> Lowest Paradise in a <strong>World</strong> Without Any Promises – <strong>The</strong> case of Hwang,<br />

Sokyong’s Baridegi”, Culture/Science (Fall Edition), 2009.<br />

23 Kim Chisoo, “Moved by Trivial Stories”, Wounds and Healing, p. 22.<br />

534


Displacement as Disease: Exploring the Links between<br />

Traditional Healing and Well-Being in the Context of a<br />

Relocation Crisis<br />

Ronel P. Dela Cruz<br />

St. Paul University Quezon City<br />

Contemporary works on the idea of place among cultural anthropologists have been looking at social<br />

identities and well-being arising from a sense of rootedness in place. 1 <strong>The</strong> growing scholarly interest on<br />

the idea of place, albeit vary from distinct premises and diverse methodologies, indicates the importance<br />

of place in human experience. Various literature provide essential insights into how places shape human<br />

consciousness, how human beings understand themselves in relation to place, and how individuals and<br />

communities respond to the changing conditions of place or to the experience of relocation or exile. 2 What<br />

is strikingly evident in the study of place is the way these diverse perspectives and fields have been seen<br />

as related to one another. <strong>The</strong> idea of place seems to demand such interdisciplinary work; its complexity<br />

requires the bringing of multiple perspectives to bear upon our understanding of who we are as placed and<br />

displaced people. It also reminds us that while place has undeniably personal significance, one’s sense of<br />

place always touches upon and is shaped by larger social, cultural and political forces.<br />

<strong>The</strong> concept of sense of place has been employed to describe the attitudes, beliefs, meanings, and<br />

interpretations that people associate with a particular place. Anthropologist Keith Basso observes<br />

that places are as much a part of us as we are part of them. 3 <strong>The</strong> estrangement of people from places<br />

1 For a helpful overview of recent trends in this area, see Steven Feld and Keith H. Basso (eds), Senses of Place (Santa Fe<br />

NM: School of American Research Press, 1996), pp. 3-11.<br />

2 J. Nicholas Entriken, <strong>The</strong> Betweenness of Place: Towards a Geography of Modernity (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University<br />

Press, 1991); John B. Jackson, A Sense of Place, A Sense of Time (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994); Yi Fu<br />

Tuan, Cosmos and Hearth (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996), and Space and Place: <strong>The</strong> Perspective of<br />

Experience (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1977).<br />

3 Keith H. Basso, Wisdom Sits in Places: Landscape and Language Among the Western Apache (Albuquerque: University<br />

of New Mexico Press, 1996). p. 4.<br />

535<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

personally and culturally important to them is widespread and alarming in the current phase of economic<br />

globalization and cultural homogenization. Gradually, we are losing the sense of what it means to dwell<br />

within a particular place, to become intimate with the landscape and be shaped by it. It is not easy to<br />

calculate the costs of losing our sense of place on our sense of well-being. But as the ever-growing body<br />

of evidence suggests, the costs are immense and a new form of suffering emerges from placelessness that<br />

has detrimental effects to individual and community’s self-identity and well-being.<br />

This study explores the link between the displacement and the community’s well-being in the context of<br />

Fuga Island. It demonstrates how people’s “sense of place” is integral to their well-being and how the<br />

situation of poverty, land insecurity, and human rights abuses in the island are causing “disease” in the<br />

community physically or biologically, emotionally, and socially in the form of conflicts and violence. It<br />

then explores the role of Fuga Island’s traditional healers or herbolarios (as they are called by the locals)<br />

in responding to this situation.<br />

Guiding the project design is a qualitative approach in exploring and understanding the inhabitants’ sense<br />

of place through the perspective of traditional healers in the context of an impending relocation and land<br />

loss. Using participant observation and focused group discussions (FGDs) to gather narratives, the study<br />

explored the link between traditional healing and the community’s well-being. Meeting the elders with<br />

their kindred spirits were rare encounters that are intuiting, reflecting and introspecting. After gathering<br />

the data, the narratives of the healers and other sources of data were encoded in NVIVO 7, a software<br />

designed for qualitative approaches that helped in the analysis of themes, trends, and patterns from the<br />

narratives.<br />

Fuga Island: a cultural landscape<br />

Fuga Island is one of the islands of the Babuyan Group in northern Philippines. With a total land area<br />

of almost 10,000 hectares, the island is home to more than 2,500 Ilocanos (an ethno-linguistic group<br />

inhabiting the northern Philippines). <strong>The</strong> island is surrounded with fine white beaches and has numerous<br />

sites for scuba diving, snorkeling, and fishing. <strong>The</strong> villagers primarily rely on swidden farming and<br />

fishing. <strong>The</strong> island is also constantly subjected to strong winds and typhoons. From August to December,<br />

the villagers could hardly cross the sea going to mainland Claveria due to strong winds and treacherous<br />

waves.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Island’s cultural heritage has been shaped by its colonial past. <strong>The</strong> Spanish colonizers who came<br />

to the island named it Babuyan Chico. For the villagers, the old church Sta. Ursula de Isla Fuga is an<br />

important historico-cultural legacy left by the Spanish missionaries. Related to this religious structure are<br />

536


the unique customs and traditions that are still practiced in the present particularly the Komedya, a drama<br />

tradition which reflects the early Christianization of the local villagers. <strong>The</strong> local leaders recognize the<br />

importance of these practices in order to rekindle among the youth love and appreciation of their cultural<br />

heritage. Nowadays, villagers use the extant ruins of the church for their weekly prayer meetings.<br />

Archaeologists discovered a burial jar culture among the island’s early inhabitants. Prehistoric burial<br />

jars are found all over the island. An archaeological mapping of the island reveals that the entire place is<br />

encircled with burial sites considered sacred places by the villagers.<br />

Suffering is the lot of majority of the people in the island. <strong>The</strong> history of the Ilocano community in the<br />

island is a history of alienation. <strong>The</strong> arrival of the colonial masters significantly changed their way of life.<br />

Freedom and abundance were altered with imposed restrictions and tight control of the island. <strong>The</strong> people<br />

who farmed the island for many generations have to beg for a piece of land from Spanish authorities.<br />

Others worked as helpers in the cattle farms of the Spanish civil authorities.<br />

<strong>The</strong> situation barely changed after the Spaniards left and the Americans took control in the early 1900s.<br />

Decade after decades, poverty marks the lives of the people of Fuga Island. <strong>The</strong>y do not have a stable<br />

source of income; they lack access to basic social services such as education, transportation, and<br />

electricity. Due to its distance from the mainland, the island is practically isolated. Access to basic health<br />

services is lacking as well. Infant mortality and cases of malnutrition are high. Villagers mostly rely on<br />

their traditional healers for their health needs. For many generations, they rely on the expertise of these<br />

healers aside from the fact that they are the immediate authorities to turn to in case a family member gets<br />

sick. <strong>The</strong> continued destruction of the island’s marine resources made life more difficult for the villagers.<br />

<strong>The</strong> situation is worsened by a culture of silence. People are wary to share their experiences to outsiders<br />

for fear that these will be used against them. Fear reigns in the island.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se social problems are rooted in the conflict over ownership of the island. When I interviewed elder<br />

and traditional healer Enrique dela Cruz, he told me he was afraid that all the natives were going to be<br />

forced to leave the island. He opened up and began telling how life deteriorated over the years. He shared<br />

that the biggest problem in the island is hunger. “<strong>The</strong>re is not enough food. We are not free. <strong>The</strong> owner<br />

controls us. <strong>The</strong> rules are extremely tough. If we disobey, we will be kicked out of the island.”<br />

Fuga Island is a contested land. A certain Alfonso Lim claims to have bought the island and sold it to<br />

another businessman Tan Yu. He dreamt of converting the island into a word-class recreational facility, a<br />

“model city of the 21st century, without squatters.” When his $50 billion fantasy island project began, a<br />

new batch of guards was deployed in the island to monitor the villagers. <strong>The</strong> presence of armed security<br />

537<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

guards and the atrocities they committed created constant fear and insecurity among the people.<br />

After Tan Yu’s death, the guards abandoned the island and the natives experienced a brief respite from<br />

their oppression and hardships. <strong>The</strong>y are now temporarily free to expand their farms. <strong>The</strong>y are allowed to<br />

renovate and expand their huts which are now dilapidating for decades because they are not allowed to cut<br />

trees. <strong>The</strong>ir farm produce is not even sufficient for family consumption. <strong>The</strong> constant struggle to survive<br />

is the main reason why many villagers, particularly the educated members of the communities, decided to<br />

migrate to the mainland.<br />

Contested Landscape<br />

Today, the Burgundy Realty Corporation, one of the primary investors of Tan Yu’s multi-billion dollar<br />

fantasy island, claims ownership of the island. It also deployed security guards to monitor the place from<br />

“illegal activities” which for the corporation means the illegal settling of the villagers since the land is<br />

privately owned. Moreover, the entire island is considered part of the Cagayan Economic Zone Authority<br />

(CEZA). <strong>The</strong> CEZA was created by Republic Act 7922 and was signed by former President Fidel Ramos<br />

in 1995. It envisions transforming northern Cagayan into an “international city, a world-class center and<br />

gateway for economic growth for the Philippines linking the dragon economies of Asia and the First<br />

<strong>World</strong>.” 4 Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile, who hails from Cagayan, pushed the CEZA Act of 7922.<br />

<strong>The</strong> economic zone covers the town of Sta. Ana and the islands of Fuga, Barit and Mabbag in Aparri town.<br />

It is intended to link up trade with Taiwan, Hong Kong, China and the United States. <strong>The</strong> development<br />

of the Cagayan Special Economic Zone and Freeport involves the creation of a transshipment industry,<br />

agro-industrial development, endowments of foreign technology, and development of tourism and leisure<br />

facilities. According to its Master Plan for the period 2011-2016, Fuga Island, together with Palaui<br />

Island and Cape Engaño, will be sites for sustainable tourism and leisure development. CEZA intends<br />

to make Fuga a haven for investors, including those from Taiwan and Hong Kong who are interested to<br />

permanently reside in the country.<br />

Even with claim of ownership by Burgundy Realty Corporation and the development plan of CEZA,<br />

the people of Fuga Island believed that they have the right to live in the island as many generations did<br />

before them. <strong>The</strong>ir families have been living in Fuga before the coming of the Spanish missionaries.<br />

<strong>The</strong>ir claim to the island is also based on their conviction that they have taken care of the land and its<br />

surrounding waters for centuries. <strong>The</strong> destruction of the island’s resources and the poverty that came along<br />

4 Cagayan Economic Zone Authority at http://ceza.gov.ph/development-plan/medium-term-development-plan-2011-2016<br />

538


with it are conditions created by outsiders claiming ownership of the land. <strong>The</strong> tight control imposed by<br />

armed security guards prevented the people from protecting the island from exploitation and degradation.<br />

According to the villagers, their strong connection with the island that spans generations have given them<br />

a sense of responsibility to care and protect the island as one would treat a family member.<br />

Sense of Place among the Villagers<br />

At the most fundamental level, the villagers described their connection to the island across time and space<br />

- where and when they were born, lived, and worked in relation to the island. <strong>The</strong>ir spatial and temporal<br />

relationship with Fuga Island served as the foundation upon which their experiences and knowledge were<br />

built. Being connected to the island means developing historical and geographical ties to the place.<br />

Being connected to the island also means experiencing the island. Whether they grew up with their farm<br />

or “fell in love” with its scenic beauty, their descriptions of their relationship to the place resonates with<br />

accounts of firsthand experiences – ancestral migration, childhood adventures, community events, wildlife<br />

encounters, and work routines. For many villagers, the island provided the perfect backdrop for social get-<br />

togethers. Altogether the villagers have had a variety of meaningful experiences throughout their lives,<br />

each contributing to their connection to Fuga Island.<br />

Being connected entails knowing the island. Born and raised in Fuga Island or having made the island a<br />

home, the villagers had acquired a certain familiarity with the island’s landscape and the community that<br />

strengthens their connection to the island. Every place in the island has its story and this story is passed<br />

on from generations. <strong>The</strong> stories which connect the lives of each family and which in turn connect each<br />

family to the island is a source of meaning-making for the community.<br />

<strong>The</strong> rhythm of life in the community revolves around such knowledge of the island which enabled them to<br />

adapt in the changing environment. <strong>The</strong>y know the types of crops to cultivate. <strong>The</strong>y know how to cope up<br />

with the typhoons that frequent the island throughout the year. <strong>The</strong>y know how to protect the island from<br />

forest fires. <strong>The</strong>y are familiar with the terrains of the island: coral reefs, hills, forests, cliffs, caves, springs,<br />

and beaches. <strong>The</strong>y are aware of the various changes in the island’s landscape - wildlife, burial sites and<br />

caves, vegetation, ethnobotany and zoology. <strong>The</strong> villagers emphasized the value of direct experiential<br />

knowledge and knowledge passed down to family members. Many of them described how learning about<br />

the island, especially its ecological significance, has influenced what Fuga Island means to them.<br />

<strong>The</strong> island held a range of meanings to community members. <strong>The</strong> people’s various connections to<br />

the island are expressed symbolically. Fuga Island is referred to as “ina” or mother, “a special place,”<br />

“a sacred place,” “a gift,” “our life,” “our heritage,” “our home,” “our roots” and “where we can be<br />

539<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

ourselves.” <strong>The</strong> people are aware and appreciative of the many benefits—tangible such as the land on<br />

which they can grow their crops and build their houses, as well as intangible benefits, such as spiritual<br />

connection, cultural and historical identity and psychological well-being. 5 Fuga Island is seen by its<br />

community members as endowed with abundant resources and biodiversity sustaining their families for<br />

generations. Overall, the meanings articulated by study participants reflected broad dimensions: the island<br />

as a gift, as a mother, as source of identity and the as nature. <strong>The</strong> four dimensions and their underlying<br />

categories and properties comprise the web of shared meanings local community members ascribed to the<br />

place.<br />

Villagers often describe the island as having healing effects. <strong>The</strong> men proudly speaks of gazing at island’s<br />

beauty as a way of restoring wearied bodies after working the whole day in the farm. Enjoying the cool<br />

breeze along the beach of Fuga had become a communal ritual providing rest and serenity after a day’s<br />

struggle. Villagers expressed a strong emotional bond or attachment to the island such as these statements<br />

that came out of my interviews: “This is my home and I will die here,” “My ancestors lived here for many<br />

generations and I cannot imagine abandoning this place. It is like abandoning one’s family, one’s root,”<br />

“Fuga has been so much part of our lives and my children’s lives. All my memories of my family and<br />

children are here.”<br />

People’s accounts of what Fuga Island means to them clearly illustrate that the social construction and<br />

expression of meanings are not static processes. Meanings evolved, as new experiences and knowledge<br />

were gained. Some villagers acknowledged that before they became aware of its uniqueness and<br />

ecological significance, they “need to suffer from the harsh rules and restrictions of outsiders.” A few<br />

villagers articulated a change of meaning. Local politics, management restrictions, and the ongoing<br />

development in the island had affected their relationship to the island.<br />

Healing in the Midst of Suffering: <strong>The</strong> Vocation of Traditional Healers<br />

Health is an important concern of the people of Fuga Islands which in turn explains the prominent<br />

role played by traditional healers in the community. <strong>The</strong> role of the healers is perceived as crucial in<br />

maintaining harmony in the community. Villagers regard their healers as the keepers of the community’s<br />

well-being. Much of the people’s beliefs of the sacred, of good and evil, of order and harmony, of the<br />

cause and meaning of an illness, of suffering and death, are derived from the articulation of their revered<br />

5 Ronel P. Dela Cruz, “People and Space as a Factor in Community-Based Development in Fuga Island,” SPUQC Journal.<br />

Vol. 1, no. 1 (2008): 1-30.<br />

540


healers. Claiming a mandate from God through dreams and their great ancestors, the healers shape and<br />

influence the lifeworld of the community. Involving the community in their rituals, they facilitate the<br />

healing process through meaningful explanations of the causes of their illnesses thus influencing their<br />

behaviors and reinforcing cultural values of the community.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are fifteen traditional healers (herbolarios) in the island. Each village has its own herbolario where<br />

people go to when they are sick or suffering. <strong>The</strong> vocation of these herbolarios stems from their desire to<br />

help people which according to them, appear in their dreams. Becoming a herbolario is a vocation which<br />

is passed on from generation to the next. <strong>The</strong>y tirelessly serve the community and would willingly respond<br />

at any time of the day that they are needed. <strong>The</strong>y cannot resist people knocking during wee hours to attend<br />

to their sick relative. People often told them that with the poverty and exploitation they have, they are their<br />

constant refuge.<br />

<strong>The</strong> healers are committed to the well-being of the community as manifested in their rituals and practices<br />

which bring forth healing and wholeness both physically and socially. <strong>The</strong> sick are not restored to their<br />

physical health but his or her relationships with others including spirits present in nature. With their<br />

presence, communal values are reiterated; difficulties are shared and transcended, solidarity is fostered as<br />

the villagers are confronted with various forms of struggles. With the lack of basic social services in the<br />

island, these healers are the people’s resource and refuge in many aspects of their lives. With their help,<br />

the villagers create a common vision and draw strength to face the challenges of living in the island. <strong>The</strong><br />

traditional healers regard faith as a source of inner strength to build a community that is just, caring, and<br />

trusting. <strong>The</strong>y live out a spirituality that celebrates community, that is oriented to seeking and promoting<br />

well-being of all, and inspires hope in the midst of sufferings and powerlessness.<br />

Ethnomedicine: healing traditions<br />

<strong>The</strong> traditional healers believe that Fuga Island is home to many spirits. <strong>The</strong> place is inhabited by ancient<br />

spirits, both good and bad. Traditional healers regard bad spirits as ‘banbanig,’ spirits who can change into<br />

various forms to deceive and frighten the people. With the insidious presence of spirits in the island, the<br />

healers see the interaction between the spirit-world and the material-world. What distinguishes traditional<br />

healing from medical treatment is the strong emphasis on spiritual healing as an inseparable component<br />

of all healing; healing that has as its objective the relief of intra-familial, interpersonal and communal<br />

stressors at the same time and on an equal level of importance as the relief of the symptoms of physical<br />

illness.<br />

When members of the community bring their sick members, the healers assume that they encountered<br />

541<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

spirit(s) (nakadalapus). <strong>The</strong> healer begins the diagnosis after reciting his/her oraciones (prayers said in<br />

Latin). <strong>The</strong>re are familiar diagnostic methods employed by the healers. First is the talado, where the healer<br />

asks the members of the family to butcher a chicken and scrutinize its entrails. When the liver has wounds,<br />

the healer assumes that the patient encountered (nakadalapus) a bad spirit and then describes what kind<br />

of spirit, where the encounter was and what remediation is to be made. <strong>The</strong> other method is the tako, a<br />

diagnostic ritual using rice grain (sometimes they use ginger) to determine if the patient encountered a<br />

spirit. <strong>The</strong> healer gets nine grains and put them in a white plate with water. After the orasyon is performed,<br />

calling the help of the spirits, the healer interprets the formation of the grains. If the grains form a crooked<br />

pattern, the patient is assumed to have encountered a bad spirit. Other diagnostic method is santiguan,<br />

where the healers used candles and a plate with water. <strong>The</strong> candle is placed around the plate, Latin prayers<br />

are recited and then followed by the healers interpretation and explanation of the cause and meaning of the<br />

illness.<br />

Unlike scientific medicine, the healers’ way of treating an illness involves members of the family and<br />

the community. Families are required to pray together and to prepare the things to be used for the ritual.<br />

Offering advice and admonishment to families is part of the entire process of healing. Given the credibility<br />

of the healer in the community, s/he facilitates the healing processes through meaningful explanations of<br />

their illnesses as well as the ability to influence behavior and reinforce cultural values of the community.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y provide culturally relevant explanations of immediate and ultimate causes of health problems in<br />

the island. Moreover, the healer draws on symbols to help the sick person understand the cause of his/her<br />

illness and how s/he can be restored to health. <strong>The</strong> healer persuades the sick person that the problem can<br />

be related to some part of the mythic world. In this community, the healer, the sick person and the family<br />

usually agree on these core meanings.<br />

After their diagnosis, the healers initiate the process of dialogue with the spirit-world. Communicating<br />

with the spirits, the healer performs the atang, a ritual compose of prayers, food and dialogue. Before<br />

the ritual, the healer requests a sumptuous meal. Food includes rice cakes, eggs, tobacco, and wine. <strong>The</strong><br />

content of the dialogue details the encounter of the patient, reparation for trespassing the spirit’s territory<br />

and food to appease the angry spirit. Herbal medicines are prescribed after the ritual for the patient to fully<br />

recover from his spirit-encounter.<br />

<strong>The</strong> foundational element in traditional healing is cosmic religion - the spirit world. This system of<br />

meaning has structures and functions that reflect human psychological, social, and biological needs for self<br />

and others. Spirits reflect a personality model and a theory of the fundamental aspects of consciousness.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se healers use spirit constructs to represent personal and social dynamics. Spirit beliefs produce<br />

psycho-physiological manipulations through their meanings and attachments, including the management<br />

542


of emotions, construction of relations between self and others, and the use of these systems to alter<br />

emotions. Healers mostly recommend herbal medicines that abound in the island. During the interview,<br />

the researcher identified almost twenty herbal medicines in the island being used by these healers. <strong>The</strong><br />

author took plant samples for identification of its other biological uses and photochemical contents.<br />

Some healers prescribe taking a pilgrimage (suknal) to religious sites outside the island (Our Lady of<br />

Piat, Our Lady of Manaoag, Apo Baket in Sinait Church in Ilocos Norte) and procession (libot) around<br />

the island. This is done if the diagnosis requires the entire participation of the villagers. <strong>The</strong> social healing<br />

processes derived from group participation and the telling of stories of illness. Winkelman 6 describes<br />

pilgrimage as a form of personal and popular empowerment produced by a journey to a site with religious,<br />

historic, and mythological significance. <strong>The</strong> pilgrimage may begin as an individual quest, but it is<br />

typically part of a collective physical movement which brings the social dimension of the pilgrimage to<br />

the experience, where one recounts one’s story of illness and search for cure with fellow travelers. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

connections provide significant personal meaning and emotional release from guilt, shame, and promises.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se experiences induce healing through a realignment of self-concept, status, and identity with the<br />

other, both cultural and divine.<br />

Fuga Island is frequently visited by inhospitable weather and typhoons. If they are not able to win God’s<br />

favor and blessing (mapatangan), the healers summon a week-long procession from the east point<br />

(Kiking) to the west point (Mudoc village) of the island. Villagers start their procession in the month of<br />

February. <strong>The</strong>y offer flowers, prayers and their produce during the procession. At the end of the ritual<br />

ceremony, they will place their offerings in a float and allow the waves to carry them away to the sea.<br />

Villagers practice this gift-giving and offering so that life will be easy and bountiful for them. During the<br />

procession, they will also make a halt to every farm (kaingin) and pray. <strong>The</strong> procession is usually led by<br />

the elders and the cantors in the island. In every sitio, the patron saint will be met by the villagers as they<br />

pray and sing. According to the elders, once they win God’s favor (mapatangan) rain will pour even in the<br />

middle of the procession. This religious practice in the island fosters communalism and bayanihan among<br />

the villagers. <strong>The</strong>se practices are tied up with their relationship with the land. Invoking God’s blessing for<br />

a bountiful harvest is very much part of their annual religious practices.<br />

Do these healing practices and strategies really work? Do really cures happen? <strong>The</strong>se questions were<br />

asked during the interview and group discussion. Efficacy is “the perceived capacity of a given practice<br />

to affect sickness in some desirable way.” 7 Fuga healers assert that they are credible in their practice<br />

6 Michael Winkelman. Culture and Health: Applying Medical Anthropology. (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009). p. 337.<br />

7 Allan Young. “<strong>The</strong> Anthropology of Illness and Sickness,” Annual Review of Anthropology, (1982) 11: 257-85.<br />

543<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

since the community continues to bring their sick to them. <strong>The</strong>y were able to alleviate their pain and treat<br />

their illnesses. From the perspective of medical anthropology, healing is efficacious when biomedical<br />

changes take place; curing is efficacious when the villagers who seek it say it is. In the island, healing<br />

is effective if the sick person is socially restored to the community. This is one of the responsibilities of<br />

the healers of the island. Efficacy is always a cultural construct. 8 This means that the healing process is<br />

considered effective when the bonds between the individual sick person and the community, weakened by<br />

disease, are strengthened, social values are affirmed, and the notion of social order no longer threatened<br />

by illnesses and death. Healing is effective when the individual experience of sickness has been made<br />

meaningful, personal suffering shared, and the individual leaves the marginal situation of sickness<br />

and is reincorporated back into the social body. In other words, healing boils downs to meaning and<br />

the transformation of experience. <strong>The</strong> change or transformation is created by all who are involved and<br />

effectively enact culturally authorized interpretations. When bad spirits (aplaw) are exorcized, the patient<br />

believes the cause of the problem is gone. This conviction is affirmed by the healer and encouraged by the<br />

social circle. <strong>The</strong> life problems may or may not still be present but their perception is no longer the same.<br />

Traditional healing and people’s health care<br />

Primarily, people go to a traditional healer seeking healing for their illnesses which is understood as both<br />

having physical and spiritual dimensions. In medical anthropology, effective health care and wellness<br />

requires an understanding of the patient’s perspectives: their views of his/her illness; and how the patient<br />

and family view the origin, significance, and implication of the condition for their life. <strong>The</strong> healer’s<br />

interaction with all the members of the sick family is important as s/he attempts to elicit explanatory<br />

models that connect or explain their system of meaning within which their maladies and treatments are<br />

understood. <strong>The</strong>se members were recognized as healers because of their commitment to the well-being<br />

of the community as manifested in their practices like free healing services, family counseling during<br />

sickness, advocates the community to respect the island, keeper of their cultural traditions, and consultant<br />

in matters related to the life of the island.<br />

In general, the people in the island believe that it is God who heals them and their community. Every time<br />

the healer performs his ritual to cure a sick member of the village, the family members and their neighbors<br />

are requested to join the ritual. This is a form of social healing for the community every time they perform<br />

the healing ritual. Winkelmann affirms the healing effects of communal ritual: “Ritual practices heal by<br />

8 Arthur Kleinman. “Towards a Comparative Study of Medical Systems: An Integrated Approach to the Study of the<br />

Relationship of Medicine and Culture,” Science, Medicine and Man, (1973) 1:55-56.<br />

544


meeting fundamental human needs for belonging, comfort, and bonding with others. Rituals integrate<br />

and bond people, enhancing social support systems, group identity, and self-development. Community<br />

bonding elicits biologically based attachment processes, facilitating adaptive change and healing for<br />

individuals and groups.” 9<br />

<strong>The</strong> traditional healers are perceived as community members with an expanded kind of identity. <strong>The</strong>y are<br />

publicly seen as persons called to serve the community; serving a larger social reality than their personal<br />

life. <strong>The</strong>ir vocation is a call that one attributes to a superior source. It is always a call from a social reality<br />

that is deemed greater than the mere individual self. <strong>The</strong> call is to participate in social movements working<br />

to reconstruct society in a way that better serves its members.<br />

Personal and Communal Transformation<br />

Called to heal the community requires transformation in both the life of the healer and the community.<br />

<strong>The</strong> healer is a man and woman of faith whom the community emulates. Common among their vocation<br />

stories is the element of faith which strengthens them in their healing ministry. <strong>The</strong>y recognize God<br />

as the healer of the community and believe that they are the instruments in their roles as healer, father,<br />

mother, public servant, and elder. With this multi-pronged role, faith is shared with the community while<br />

recognizing the need to cultivate it as they mature in their healing vocation. It is their faith that strengthens<br />

them as they wrestle with spirits in order to restore their patients back to health. As the healers mature in<br />

their calling, they gained confidence in their faith and works. <strong>The</strong>y acquired and developed tibay ng loob<br />

(inner strength) and tiwala sa sarili (self-confidence) as they practice their calling.<br />

<strong>The</strong> healers of Fuga perceive their work as a form of solidarity, a way of partaking in the social burden<br />

of the community. Here, the healers recognize their bigger role outside their families and are challenged<br />

to be a model to the community by promoting good relationships. Difficulties in the community are<br />

overcome because of the expression of solidarity or the bayanihan spirit encouraged by the healers when<br />

s/he performs healing ritual. A significant component of the healing ritual is the exhortation of the healer<br />

to gather all the members of the family and discuss the prognosis of their sick member. This is also the<br />

time to be together as a community sharing their struggles, problems, community needs, aspirations for<br />

the future and the like. <strong>The</strong> ritual brings community healing both physically and spiritually. Sickness,<br />

illness and disease in the island are moments to reflect as a community, hence, communal relationship is<br />

also restored.<br />

9 Michael Winkelman, Culture and Health: Applying Medical Anthropology, p. 342.<br />

545<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Majority of the villagers demonstrate a strong trust in the healers of the island. With their presence,<br />

communal values of bayanihan and damayan are strengthened and affirmed. <strong>The</strong>y serve as a “uniting<br />

force” in the village particularly in times of hardships and distress, a situation that has become a normal<br />

way of living in the island. Sometimes communal quarrels are pacified through their intervention. In<br />

times of difficulties, they admonish the people to help one another by sharing what they have order to<br />

survive. <strong>The</strong> villagers learn the value of solidarity because of their healers who are always with them,<br />

accompanying them in the struggles and difficulties.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Traditional Healers and the Well-Being of the Community in the Midst of Displacement<br />

<strong>The</strong> traditional healers play a critical role in the transformation of their communities. Gifted with special<br />

skills and talents to heal, these healers are regarded by the community as wisdom keepers, interpreters<br />

of traditions, performers of communal rituals for healing and memories, looked by the community as<br />

guardians and respected elders who provide vision for the community members. While the community is<br />

deprived of basic social services, the presence of traditional healers, including their indigenous knowledge<br />

systems, can improve the quality of life for all the villagers through the development of indigenous<br />

healing and traditional medicines.<br />

In the midst of the ongoing relocation crisis, these healers exhibit their commitment to the well being of<br />

the community in myriad ways. Violence and conflicts constantly arise in the community because of the<br />

situation of insecurity and worsening poverty. Respected for the wisdom and concern for the community,<br />

the traditional healers are the ones to whom the community go to in order to mediate and to settle disputes.<br />

Communal issues that threaten the villages like illegal cutting of trees, dynamite fishing, use of cyanide,<br />

illegal pebble poaching, desecration of burial sites and decimation of exotic flora and fauna of the island<br />

are raised by these healers to the local barangay for communal action. For instance, the villagers sought<br />

the counsel of one healer Agapito Balbag about the ongoing pebble poaching in the island. After a couple<br />

of dialogue with him, the villagers made a collective stand to protect their coast from poachers and<br />

outlined some course of action including reporting to higher authorities. Elder Agapito reiterates that the<br />

island is a gift to them, a source of their daily existence. “We are the island. If they will take away from<br />

us, then we all die”, he said. Some traditional healers proposed a local ordinance to protect the old church<br />

ruins and penalize those who illegally cut trees.<br />

<strong>The</strong> wisdom of these healers influences the worldview of the villagers in terms of their sense of place and<br />

commitment to protect the island. Elder Claro dela Cruz aptly puts it:<br />

“We are blessed with plants/herbs that we can use for various illnesses and ailments. <strong>The</strong> entire<br />

546


island is our medicine while it is also a source of sickness. When people get sick, I always remind<br />

them to treat the island with respect and care. People look at our healing activities as a form of<br />

solidarity (damayan). We help ourselves in times of difficulties here in the island.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> role of the traditional healers as keepers and interpreters of their island traditions can be best seen<br />

in the practice of Komedya de Isla Fuga, a drama tradition originally based on the Christianization of<br />

the Muslims but is now reinterpreted by the healers as a way of training young people to be responsible<br />

members of the community through inculcating the values of discipline, prayer and devotion. This drama<br />

tradition, according to the healers, asserts their identity and history since they have been performing this<br />

during for several decades. It becomes a part of their life; celebrating life in the midst of unfreedom and<br />

fear and rely on the generosity of God for a healthy and bountiful harvest free from typhoons, pestilence<br />

and calamities.<br />

<strong>The</strong> life and stories of these healers attest that wellbeing is lived in the island amidst internal and external<br />

economic threats. As wisdom keepers, they are in touch with the lifeworld of the people: their troubles<br />

and ailments, their conflicts and struggles, their hopes and dreams. <strong>The</strong>y live out their vocation in the<br />

context of samahan that practical experiences of illness, chaos in social relations and personal problems<br />

are interpreted and given new meaning. Furthermore, they involve the community in their rituals thereby<br />

facilitating the healing process through meaningful explanations of the sickness, influencing their<br />

behavior, and reinforcing cultural values of the community.<br />

<strong>The</strong> community recognized these healers beyond their role as healers of their illnesses. <strong>The</strong>ir vocation<br />

to heal extends to their commitment to uplift the lives of the people of Fuga Island, accompanying them<br />

in their struggles and in celebrating their hopes and joys. <strong>The</strong> healing rituals and practices bring forth<br />

restored relationships and wellness in the community. With the relocation crisis, these healers are the<br />

people’s refuge and leaders who are committed to their well-being. With their help, the villagers create a<br />

common vision and draw strength to face the challenges of living in the island.<br />

547<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Treatment of Hwabyung in Traditional Medicine with Four<br />

Elements of Non-Violent Communication<br />

Young-Wan Kim<br />

Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine<br />

1. Introduction<br />

<strong>The</strong> development of information society in the 21st century and complex living environments have<br />

increased the level of stress among contemporaries and given rise to various diseases. Hwabyung (“anger<br />

illness”) is one of the more notable diseases that have surfaced amidst various interpersonal relationships<br />

in modern society.<br />

We go on living our lives forging various interpersonal relationships with others in various environments.<br />

<strong>The</strong> type of relationships we form with others as a member of society becomes one of the deciding<br />

factors of our quality of life. <strong>The</strong>se relationships have a mutual impact on people both on a conscious and<br />

subconscious level, and a social consensus is formed when ideas are exchanged through dialogue.<br />

Non-violent communication (“NVC”), also called compassionate communication, or the language of life,<br />

was developed by Marshall B. Rosenberg. NVC helps see the world in terms of accepting existence in<br />

itself, mutual respect and contribution, co-prosperity and integration, cooperation, and peace.<br />

Based on observations, feelings, needs, and requests, NVC seeks to discover strategies that allow<br />

everyone’s needs to be met through mutual respect and bonds. <strong>The</strong> aim of NVC is to maintain one’s<br />

determination while still being empathetic, and to listen to the ideas of others while continuing the<br />

conversation.<br />

When expressing one’s feelings in a conversation, specific language communicates the emotional state<br />

more clearly and accurately than when using vague or abstract language. <strong>The</strong> “stage where one’s feelings<br />

about an action are verbally expressed” has been written into a “Feeling List” comprising of feelings that<br />

548


are felt when one’s needs are met and unmet.<br />

When people’s needs are met, they feel a sense of satisfaction in the easiness of their lives. On the other<br />

hand, when a desired need is not met, their minds are filled with self-anxiety and agony, and unmet needs<br />

accumulate over time to become stress.<br />

Thus, exchanging ideas through conversations will reduce emotional conflict and needs while enhancing<br />

the sense of satisfaction. In modern society, however, the lack of communication relatively decreases<br />

opportunities to meet needs and causes an increase in mental stress.<br />

<strong>The</strong> concept of stress was first used in the 1850’s as a means to explain the repressive pressure and tension<br />

occurring in the mental domain, not just in bodily organs, and it has been studied through a scientific<br />

approach of orthodox medicine in modern times.<br />

Stress is caused not only by physical stimuli such as noise, the cold, and unfamiliar environments, but<br />

also by feelings and thoughts such as love, hatred, rage, and joy. Stimuli that cause stress in people can<br />

be categorized as either external or internal. External stimuli are events that take place in the surrounding<br />

environment and can include various problems that arise in interpersonal relationships, parting, death, and<br />

physical exhaustion. Internal stimuli are all the needs of the internal body such as sexual needs, need for<br />

dependency, and aggressive instincts.<br />

Thus, stress occurs when a person’s ability to cope with external or internal stimuli is weakened or<br />

lacking. If these circumstances persist and stress accumulates over time, stress becomes chronic and<br />

causes mental instability and conflict, eventually leading to hwabyung (“anger illness”).<br />

In oriental medicine, hwabyung is deemed to be caused by changes in the “seven emotions,” where<br />

extreme stimuli impact changes in the physiology and causes stress.<br />

2. Four elements of non-violent communication applied in healing hwabyung in traditional<br />

medicine<br />

hwabyung occurs in the heart, or the mind, and is related to emotions such as rage. It is a symptom that<br />

occurs while such feelings are left undealt with (and needs are left unmet) and is expressed in the form of<br />

anger.<br />

Hwabyung has long been referred to as ulhwabyung (“depression anger illness”) in Korea and defined<br />

549<br />

Session 4


and encouragement gained from talking to the therapist and forming a bond. Thus, he is able to overcome<br />

his delusions of unmet psychological needs and better adapt to society. <strong>The</strong> reduction of mental pressures<br />

cures hwabyung and the patient becomes healthier both mentally and physically.<br />

<strong>The</strong> stories of Siksungsahu and Nokjin are two representative cases of curing hwabyung through<br />

talking. Supportive psychotherapy was used so that the patient can face his problems and overcome it by<br />

supporting his weakened self. This method of treatment recovers and strengthens the patient’s damaged<br />

defense mechanism, and is centered around rapport between the patient and the therapist, enabling patients<br />

faced with problems derived from everyday life to overcome them and move on.<br />

Thus, the techniques mentioned in Table 1 can be used to reassure, persuade, or give suggestions to the<br />

patient, and create an environment of encouragement, advice, and explanation. <strong>The</strong> patient’s tension and<br />

anxiety are reduced by the therapist’s warm, empathetic attitude.<br />

Conversations for Treatment in Supportive Psychotherapy<br />

Reassurance <strong>The</strong>rapist maintains authority and remains neutral to reassure the patient<br />

Ventilation<br />

Abreaction<br />

Support<br />

Persuasion<br />

Suggestion<br />

Help the patient discuss various things he cannot share with others<br />

Verbalization of problems reduces tension and dissatisfaction<br />

Reducing accumulated stress or tension by expressing suppressed thoughts and<br />

emotions without realization<br />

Reducing anxiety and conflict and thereby enhancing social adaptability of the patient<br />

by listening with an open attitude<br />

Strengthening the patient’s weakened self by appealing to a sense of reason,<br />

determination, and moral ethics using authority as therapist<br />

Strengthen sense of self and help self-critique through recommendation and<br />

explaining, using mutual trust instead of force<br />

Suggesting reduction of symptoms and improvements in condition as a means of<br />

treatment<br />

From the above table, we can see that the treatments used in “Donguibogam” and “Samguk Saki” are<br />

utilizing the same psychotherapy techniques used in modern oriental medicine. At the same time, the<br />

conversational treatments to cure hwabyung make use of the four elements of NVC.<br />

Non-violent communication is a method of sincere communication using peaceful language used in<br />

everyday life that enables people to maintain character even in difficult situations. Thus, it is likely that<br />

NVC was naturally a part of the traditional treatment methods of hwabyung.<br />

553<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

- Observation of situation in its true context<br />

- Expression of feelings upon observation<br />

- Verbalization of how these feelings are related to internal needs<br />

- Expressing through request what is wanted from others<br />

<strong>The</strong>se four elements of NVC allow clear communication of one’s ideas to exchange information required<br />

in a conversation. In the traditional treatment of hwabyung, this information allows observation of the<br />

patient’s condition and its treatment by learning the patient’s specific needs and possible solutions through<br />

conversation. Each of the four elements of NVC are applied flexibly depending on the circumstances of<br />

the individual and society.<br />

Feeling List<br />

Feelings when needs are met Feelings when needs are not met<br />

impressed, touched, moved, thrilled, overwhelmed,<br />

ecstatic, exuberant<br />

grateful, thankful<br />

amused, pleased, delighted, jubilant, happy, glad,<br />

blissful<br />

554<br />

worried, distant, dismal, fearful, concerned, distracted,<br />

withdrawn<br />

afraid, terrified, petrified, appalled, frightened, scared,<br />

petrified, timid<br />

warm, tender, loving, comfortable, sheltered, loving, uneasy, nervous, tense, jittery, restless, anxious, distressed<br />

sentimental, cordial, friendly<br />

uncomfortable, disturbed, abashed, perplexed, flustered,<br />

enlivened, rejuvenated, satisfied, refreshed, appeased, self-conscious, displeased, distressed, unpleasant,<br />

rested, renewed, reassured, revived, carefree<br />

frustrated, troubled, unsettled, awkward, unnerved<br />

sad, mournful, longing, yearning, sorrowful, wistful,<br />

rested, soothed, composed, intimate, friendly, relaxed,<br />

relieved, equanimous, light<br />

pining, moody, miserable, appalled, regretful, dismal,<br />

pitiful, doleful<br />

hurt, disheartened, remorseful, coldhearted, discouraged,<br />

indifferent, disappointed<br />

lonely, solitary, empty, alienated, dejected, desolate,<br />

comfortable, calm, quiet, mellow, tranquil, still, serene dreary, weak<br />

interested, intrigued, fascinated, entranced<br />

energetic, thrilled, elated, valiant, invigorated, vivacious,<br />

sanguine, lively, ardent, confident, encouraged,<br />

depressed, helpless, listless, gloomy, melancholy<br />

tired, burnt out, exhausted, weary, lethargic,<br />

annoyed, tedious, devastated, frustrated, beat, dull,<br />

agitated, worn out, bored<br />

disgusted, repulsed, horrified, contempt<br />

confused, dazed, embarrassed, bewildered, mortified,<br />

baffled, ashamed<br />

excited, aroused, expectant, giddy, optimistic, eager angry, furious, upset, aggravated, enraged, incensed,<br />

indignant, resentful, livid


As in the case of “Donguibogam” and “Samguk Saki,” descriptions of occurrence of hwabyung from the<br />

seven energies caused by accumulated unmet needs use similar language to that used in the Feeling List.<br />

Similarly, language used to treat hwabyung is similar to the feelings used to describe when needs are met.<br />

Moreover, the objectivity and neutral attitude required of therapists when treating patients with hwabyung<br />

is similar to the precautions of using the four elements of NVC – “distinguish observation from evaluation<br />

to see things as they are,” “distinguish feeling from thought to see as one actually feels,” “distinguish<br />

needs from means and methods to see the actual cause of the feeling,” and “distinguish request from<br />

coercion to see concretely and positively.”<br />

Need List<br />

Autonomy<br />

freedom to choose one’s dreams, goals, and values,<br />

freedom to choose plans and methods to fulfill one’s dreams, goals, and<br />

values<br />

Celebration celebration for birth of life or realization of dream<br />

Mourning mourning for loss of a loved one or a dream<br />

Interdependence<br />

Integrity<br />

Play laughter, fun<br />

gratitude, empathy, community, consideration, love,<br />

contribution to enrich life, acceptance, trust,<br />

security, warmth, understanding, mental stability,<br />

honesty, respect, support, intimacy, communication<br />

sincerity, respect for individualism, creativity, significance, reward, selfconfidence,<br />

self-respect<br />

Spiritual Communion beauty, inspiration, harmony, order, peace<br />

Physical Nurturance<br />

air, water, food, free movement, exercise,<br />

protection from life threats, rest, sexual expression,<br />

habitation, physical contact (affection)<br />

<strong>The</strong> therapist’s job is to help the patient cure hwabyung, or in other words, fulfill basic human needs as<br />

described in Table 3.<br />

<strong>The</strong> treatment of hwabyung through conversation in orthodox medicine begins from the understanding of<br />

various problems in the patient’s life through communication and bond between humans. This requires<br />

a completely objective observation of the patient. Treatment of hwabyung rooted deep inside the mind<br />

through mutual communication means to reduce various psychological factors arising from stress in<br />

modern society.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Giungoroen treatment, used as a form of supportive psychotherapy in orthodox medicine, treats<br />

hwabyung by conversation based on true communication focused on the patient’s condition, mental state,<br />

555<br />

Session 4


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

and current emotional disturbance.<br />

Here, conversation is used as a means to reduce the mental factors that cause hwabyung and to adjust the<br />

mental state and emotional activity of the patient.<br />

Conversational treatment as used in orthodox medicine utilizes each of the four elements of non-violent<br />

communication to reduce unmet needs that ultimately cause hwabyung.<br />

556


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Session 5<br />

Parallel Session 3<br />

Organizers’ Session<br />

• Parallel 3-1. UNESCO: Narratives of Change<br />

• Parallel 3-2. MEST/NRF: Healing <strong>Humanities</strong> in Korea<br />

• Parallel 3-3. Busan City: 20C Busan, its Scars and Healing


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Parallel Session 3-1<br />

UNESCO: Narratives of Change<br />

1. Narratives as Healing: Perspectives from Environmental History<br />

/ Gregory Quenet (University of Versailles-Quentin-en-Yvelines)<br />

2. Tiger-Human Conflict in the Sundarbans: A Historicized Account<br />

/ Ranjan Chakrabarti (Vidyasagar University)


Narratives as Healing: Perspectives from<br />

Environmental History<br />

Gregory Quenet<br />

University of Versailles-Quentin-en-Yvelines<br />

Narratives have the power of engagement and transformation. Bringing together people in a common<br />

pattern, narratives can coalesce them around shared values and representations, interpretations of the<br />

past and projections toward the future. Past natural disasters proved that a group struck by a catastrophe<br />

and unable to produce narratives will have great difficulties to recover. A narrative is a powerful tool to<br />

describe human acts within a network of relationships, processes and systems. <strong>The</strong> configuration of events<br />

into a plot is as meaningful as the mathematical models and algorithms built by the natural sciences. This<br />

literary form also provides us with intensive education opportunities about the meaning of change by<br />

taking us into the heart of the human value system.<br />

However, this reflexive approach needs a careful methodology. By writing stories about change, we<br />

divide the causal relationship of an ecosystem with a rhetorical razor (William Cronon) that defines what<br />

is included and excluded, relevant and irrelevant, empowered and disempowered. In the act of separating<br />

a story from non-story events, we wield the most powerful, yet dangerous, tool of a narrative. A narrative<br />

succeeds to the extent that it hides discontinuities, ellipses, and contradictory experiences that would<br />

undermine the intended meaning of its story. Whatever its overt purpose, it cannot avoid a covert exercise<br />

of power. It inevitably sanctions some voices while silencing others.<br />

Without a plot to organize the flow of events, everything happening on the planet will be much harder –<br />

even impossible to understand. Two main plots are possible in relation to environmental change. On the<br />

one hand, we can narrate history as a story of improvement that is somehow more positive. On the other<br />

hand, we can tell stories in which the plot eventually falls toward an ending that is more negative. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

plots are cultural constructions, so deeply embedded in our language that they resonate far beyond local<br />

places. Placed in a particular historical or ideological context, neither group of plots is innocent: both have<br />

hidden agendas that influence what the narrative includes and excludes. So powerful are these agendas<br />

561<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

that not even the scholar as author entirely controls them.<br />

What distinguishes stories from other forms of discourse is that they describe an action that begins,<br />

continues over a well-defined period of time, and finally draws to a definite close, with consequences<br />

that become meaningful because of their placement within the narrative. Completed action gives a story<br />

its unity and allows us to evaluate and judge an act by its results. <strong>The</strong> moral of a story is defined by its<br />

ending. As Aristotle remarked, “the end is everywhere the chief thing.” Narrative is a peculiarly human<br />

way of organizing reality, and this has important implications for the way we approach the reality of<br />

climate change.<br />

Some non-human events can be said to have properties that conform to the Aristotelian beginning-<br />

middle-end requirement of storytelling, as when an individual organism (or a species or a mountain or<br />

even the universe itself) is born, persists and dies. One can tell stories about such things – geologists<br />

and evolutionary biologist often do – but they lack the compelling drama that comes from having a<br />

judgeable protagonist. Things in nature usually just happen, without raising questions of moral choice.<br />

Many natural events lack even this much linear structure. Some are cyclical: the motions of the planets,<br />

the seasons, or the rhythms of biological fertility and reproduction. Others are random: climate shifts,<br />

earthquakes, genetic mutations, and other events, the causes of which remain hidden from us. One does<br />

not automatically describe such things with narrative plots, and yet environmental histories, which purport<br />

to set the human past in its natural context, all have plots. Nature and the universe do not tell stories; only<br />

we do. Nature is unlike most other cultural subjects in lacking a clear voice of its own.<br />

Future narratives face another important constraint in that scholars do not tell stories by themselves. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

write story as members of communities, and they purposely or unconsciously take those communities into<br />

account as they work. People tell stories with each other and against each other in order to speak to each<br />

other. Stories are made by intercommunications between tellers and readers.<br />

562


Tiger-Human Conflict in the Sundarbans:<br />

A Historicized Account<br />

Ranjan Chakrabarti<br />

Vidyasagar University<br />

<strong>The</strong> aim of the present research article is simple. It gives a rounded historicized account of the human-<br />

tiger conflict in the Sundarbans, the mangrove tiger land in the Bengal delta. In the Sundarbans, the tiger<br />

had always been at the centre of economic, social, cultural and religious life of the people. This was the<br />

case in the past and it still is. <strong>The</strong> people of the Sundarbans had been considering the tiger as a vermin<br />

since times immemorial. Here the local jungle deities like Dakshin Roy, the tiger god, and Banbibi are<br />

worshipped by both the Hindus and Muslims. 1<br />

I. Human-wildlife conflict<br />

<strong>The</strong> structure of human-wildlife conflict has undergone a qualitative change in the post- Second <strong>World</strong><br />

War era. Modern conservationist ideas have done away with (at least theoretically) subsistence and<br />

defence hunting or hunting as sport in South Asia. Indiscriminate slaughter or lethal control of animals<br />

does not take place in modern times. 2 What bothers us in recent times is not so much the direct killing or<br />

lethal control of animals by the humans but the continuous expansion of human settlements, industry and<br />

agriculture with the support of modern sophisticated technology. This is continuously eating up the habitat<br />

1 <strong>The</strong> local people of the Sundarbans always give the tiger a very reverential treatment, they never utter the word ‘bagh’<br />

(the Bengali word for tiger) instead they call the tiger Baramiya (senior headman) and the crocodile chhotamiyan (junior<br />

headman); see Sutapa Chatterjee Sarkar, <strong>The</strong> Sundarbans: Folk Deities, Monsters and Mortals, New Delhi, 2010, passim;<br />

also Annu Jalais, Forest of Tigers: People, Politics and Environment in the Sundarbans, Delhi, 2009, passim.<br />

2 <strong>The</strong> animal right activists and the animal liberation movements have played a significant role in this context. Peter Singer,<br />

a leading spokesman for animal rights, bears the dubious honour of having made popular the term ‘speciesism’ as an epithet<br />

to describe those most of us, he says – who believe the differences are in kind, not just degree. <strong>The</strong> evocation of and<br />

comparison to racism is explicit, see Peter Singer, Animal Liberation : A New Ethics For Our Treatment of Animals, New<br />

York, 1975, passim. In the opening sentence of the volume Singer writes: “This book is about the tyranny of the human<br />

over non-human animals”, p. ix.<br />

563<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

of wild animals causing food shortage or threatening their lives in various ways. Elephant-train collision,<br />

bird-aircraft collision, deer-automobile collisions symbolize this fundamental human-wildlife clash. Large<br />

carnivores require larger habitats for their survival and with the shrinkage of the corridor their roads are<br />

now crossing with the humans more frequently. 3 It is against this backdrop that the history of the problem<br />

of human-tiger conflict in the Sundarbans has to be understood. We shall see that apart from the shrinkage<br />

of the corridor there are certain unique bio-geographic factors behind the human-tiger conflict in the<br />

Sundarbans.<br />

II. A Brief History of the Sundarbans<br />

<strong>The</strong> Sundarbans has a unique history, nature and landscape 4 . It is half water and half land. It is a terrain<br />

where land making has not yet come to an end. It is a place that had been alternately inhabited and<br />

deserted. It is perhaps the only place on earth that is threatened by cyclones, tidal waves, lack of fresh<br />

water, an unfriendly terrain, tigers, crocodiles and poisonous snakes. It is a unique tigerland where tigers<br />

are usually described as confirmed man-eaters.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Sundarbans is the largest mangrove forest and the only mangrove tiger land in the world where the<br />

tiger occupies the pinnacle of both aquatic and terrestrial food web. <strong>The</strong> area lies south-east of the city<br />

of Kolkata (Calcutta) 5 in the 24 Parganas District of West Bengal and forms part of the Gangetic Delta<br />

which borders the Bay of Bengal. Shared between two neighbouring countries, Bangladesh and India,<br />

the larger part (62% of the total mangrove ecosystem) is situated in the southwest corner of Bangladesh.<br />

<strong>The</strong> western boundary of the Bangladesh Sundarbans follows the Harinbhanga – Raimangal – Kalindi<br />

river system and joins with the Indian Sundarbans. 6 <strong>The</strong> total land area is 4,143 square kilometer and the<br />

remaining water area is 1,874 square kilometer.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Indian Sundarbans is one of the tiger reserves under the Project Tiger launched in 1973 to save tiger<br />

3 See M.R.Conover, Resolving Human-Wildlife Conflicts: <strong>The</strong> Science of Wildlife Damage Management, New York, 2002,<br />

passim.<br />

4 <strong>The</strong> nearest equivalent of the Sundarbans, in more ways than one, is the Everglades National Park in Florida (USA), see<br />

Michael Grunwald, <strong>The</strong> Swamp : <strong>The</strong> Everglades, Florida and the Politics of Paradise, New York, 2007.<br />

5 <strong>The</strong> Indian city of Calcutta gave up its British colonial name with effect from January 2001 and came to be known by its<br />

original name Kolkata, see <strong>The</strong> Telegraph, 2 January, Kolkata, 2001, also http://www.highbeam.com/doc/IGI-68590471.<br />

html<br />

6 India was partitioned in 1947 which resulted in the creation of two independent nation states India and Pakistan. <strong>The</strong><br />

colonial province of Bengal was divided into East Pakistan and the Indian province of West Bengal. East Pakistan broke<br />

away from Pakistan in 1971 and became another independent nation – Bangladesh, see Willem van Schendel, <strong>The</strong> Bengal<br />

Borderland: Beyond State and Nation in South Asia, London, 2005.<br />

564


from extinction. 7 In terms of biodiversity, the Sundarbans contrasts the other large mangrove forests for<br />

its extraordinary diverse wildlife and designated as UNESCO’s world network of International Biosphere<br />

Reserves since 2001. <strong>The</strong> biosphere reserve programme in the Sundarbans originally started in the early<br />

1970s and it was set up with the basic objective of conserving and developing a new knowledge base<br />

about the biodiversity of a region to emphasize that humans are an integral part of the ecosystem and<br />

that local communities should be actually integrated with and brought into the orbit of the conservation<br />

programme. This is all the more necessary in view of the fact that some three million people live in this<br />

biosphere reserve. <strong>The</strong>y depend directly on forest and forest-based resources since agriculture is not<br />

productive enough due to saline water. <strong>The</strong> core area of the Sundarban National Park has been designated<br />

as a <strong>World</strong> Heritage site. Besides production functions of the forest, it provides natural protection to life<br />

and properties of the coastal population in cyclone prone Bangladesh and southern West Bengal. 8 This<br />

unique natural zone has a unique history.<br />

III. Tiger and the Raj<br />

It is not difficult to reconstruct a rough sketch of the general history of the Sundarbans during the pre-<br />

colonial period but the detailed history of the tiger-human conflict in that region is available only after the<br />

advent of British colonial rule. This limitation is applicable to the history of the tiger-human conflict in the<br />

entire South Asian sub-continent.<br />

While encountering the orient, the Europeans developed certain stereotypes in their own perceptions of<br />

the Indian sub-continent which had an enduring legacy. <strong>The</strong> image of the tiger is one such stereotype.<br />

<strong>The</strong> essential elements of the tiger’s image are cruelty, furtiveness and treacherous elegance. <strong>The</strong> British<br />

response to the tiger is an amazing compound of fear, hatred and admiration. <strong>The</strong> British saw the tiger as<br />

a magnificent animal who establishes its overlord ship of the Indian jungle. <strong>The</strong> craze for tiger-skin and<br />

7 Mahesh Rangarajan, India’s Wildlife History, Delhi, 1998, pp. 95-107. <strong>The</strong> Project Tiger initially started as a task force set<br />

up within the Indian Board of Wildlife chaired by Dr Karan Singh, minister for health and family planning. It was precisely<br />

at this time that global voluntary groups made their way into the Indian environmental scene. Most important among<br />

them was the <strong>World</strong> Wildlife Fund or WWF.<br />

8 Rathindranath De, Sundarbans, Delhi, 1990, pp. 1-4. Recent experience of cyclones and storms shows how important<br />

such natural protections are in neutralizing the impact of storms or cyclones. Haiti was hit by deadly tropical storms in<br />

May and September 2004. Nearly 5,000 Haitians lost their lives and homes during these severe storms. <strong>The</strong> cleaning of<br />

trees in the Haitian highlands had aggravated the tragedy that shook Haiti. Destitute and lacking alternative sources of<br />

fuel, Haiti’s poor have cut down most of their trees for fuelwood and charcoal. In doing so they have lost a valuable service<br />

provided by forested watersheds-the moderation of local flood runoff and the prevention of massive mudslides. Interestingly<br />

the same storms that devastated Haiti had less impact on neighboring Puerto Rico, where highland watersheds are<br />

mostly forested. For further details see Sandra Postel, Safeguarding Freshwater Ecosystems, in State of the <strong>World</strong> 2006 :<br />

A <strong>World</strong>watch Institute Report on Progress Toward a Sustainable Society, New York and London, 2006, pp. 41-60.<br />

565<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

skins of other big cats spread far beyond India. <strong>The</strong> art of taxidermy 9 developed to amazing proportions.<br />

<strong>The</strong> lifelike taxidermised tiger heads in the drawing room wall of the sahib was made to look alive, scary<br />

and fearful. <strong>The</strong> practice of displaying shikar-souvenir as drawing room show-piece came to be intimately<br />

associated with the culture of the ruling race or class and with the memories of the Raj. <strong>The</strong> cost of a<br />

medium size shikar expedition in the nineteenth century would be around Rs.500. 10 <strong>The</strong> amount included<br />

the cost of sending the railway parcel of the skin to Vaningen and Vaningen of Mysore for finally dressing<br />

up the tiger for the sahib’s drawing room. 11<br />

As British power in India expanded the information as to the deaths caused by tiger began to pour in.<br />

By the second half of the nineteenth century it was estimated that 1600 people were killed by tiger each<br />

year. 12 Again, it was estimated that each tiger was capable of killing cattle worth between 300 pounds<br />

and 600 pounds in a single year. 13 This was precisely why the tiger was defined as a vermin. This status,<br />

shared with the other big cats, was emphasized by the fact that they were such successful and prolific<br />

animals, inhabiting a great variety of habitats, from the far south to the mountains of the north. It became<br />

imperative from the point of view of the British colonial rulers to order the ‘bad tiger’ in particular. This<br />

resolution to order the tiger was actually an integral part of a much broader strategy of power which<br />

sprang from the spirit of European enlightenment and the urge of the colonial rulers to superimpose new<br />

cultural patters and sensibilities on the dominated society. <strong>The</strong> tiger, therefore, had to be done away with<br />

to ensure the security of individual life and property which was one of the most publicized aspects of the<br />

ideologies of Raj. 14<br />

9 Taxidermy is the technology associated with processing of animal skin. It is the art of preparing, stuffing and mounting<br />

animal skin used to decorate the homes of the richer classes. Contemporary newspapers and handbooks on shikar featured<br />

regular advertisements by the taxidermists. Cuthbertson and Harper were well known taxidermists of Calcutta. <strong>The</strong>y ran<br />

their regular office at 10, Government Place, Calcutta.<br />

10 Y. D. Gundevia, In the Districts of the Raj, Bombay, 1992, pp. 205-6.<br />

11 Ibid., p. 206.<br />

12 J.M.Mackenzie, <strong>The</strong> Empire of Nature, Manchester, 1988, pp. 168-98.<br />

13 Ibid., p. p. 180.<br />

180.<br />

14 Any number of documents can be cited to substantiate the statement. In the colonial accounts we fi find nd the image of the<br />

‘man-eater’ or the ‘bad tiger’. <strong>The</strong> contemporary literature on hunting, authored mostly by white shikaris, the forest department<br />

proceedings, the government gazette notifications - all seemed to be somewhat obsessed with the image of the<br />

man-eating tiger and the probable causes of the change over from animal to human flesh. <strong>The</strong> tiger, if it was a man-eater,<br />

had to be ordered, the wild orient had to be disciplined and brought under reason. This is the voice of enlightenment and<br />

this voice comes in very clearly in Kipling’s Jungle Book: “<strong>The</strong> law of the jungle, which never orders anything without<br />

a reason, forbids every beast to eat man except when he is killing to show his children how to kill, and then he must hunt<br />

outside the hunting grounds of his pack or tribe, the real reason for this is that man killing means, sooner or later; the arrival<br />

of white men on elephants, with guns […]. <strong>The</strong> reason the beasts give among themselves is that Man is the weakest<br />

and most defenseless of all living things, and it is unsportsmanlike to touch him.”<br />

It deserves mention here that Shere Khan, the villainous character in the Jungle Book, was lame or physically crippled<br />

and inclined to man-eating. Thus the tiger shot would have to be preferable a ‘man-eater’. <strong>The</strong> tiger, whose behav-<br />

566


IV. <strong>The</strong> Royal Bengal Tiger of the Sundarbans<br />

Hundreds of Europeans on board the Calcutta bound vessels cruising through the waters of Hooghly,<br />

keeping the Sagar Island on their right, hardly noticed the Sundarbans, they were mere passengers<br />

who looked yet did not observe. Those who attempted to describe the landscape did so carelessly, and<br />

rather indifferently as the site appeared to be discouraging and grim. <strong>The</strong> passengers, who arrived in the<br />

eighteenth century unenthusiastically, recorded the mud-banks, flooded low lying jungles, sandbanks<br />

and the reddish brown waters of the surroundings through which they passed. By the beginning of the<br />

nineteenth century however colonial knowledge about the Indian landscape had advanced and generated<br />

a new curiosity among the Britons. <strong>The</strong>re are two major threads that run through the texts relating to the<br />

Sundarban landscape penned by these voyagers 1) it was viewed as a dangerous terrain, a place of deadly<br />

fever, of ferocious tigers and crocodiles, 2) the region became identified with the ‘barbaric’ practice of<br />

infanticide practiced by the Hindu devotees in the Sagar Island. 15<br />

<strong>The</strong> earliest concrete reference to the notoriety of the tigers of the Sundarbans is to be located in the<br />

writing of Francois Bernier who visited the Sundarbans in 1665. Here is a passage about the beast from<br />

the Travels in the Mogul Empire:<br />

‘Among these islands, it is in many places dangerous to land and great care must be had that the boat,<br />

which during the night is fastened to a tree, be kept at some distance from the shore, for it constantly<br />

happens that some person or another falls prey to tigers. <strong>The</strong>se ferocious animals are very apt, it is said, to<br />

enter in to the boat itself while people are asleep, and to carry away some victim who, if we are to believe<br />

the boatmen of the country, generally happen to be the stoutest and fattest of the party’. 16 Colonial records<br />

are packed with tales of European deaths when people were seized by tiger on journeys, on picnics,<br />

or out hunting, as many graves in European cemeteries would testify. <strong>The</strong> most famous such incident<br />

iour does not conform to reason or to the supposed ‘Law of Jungle’ may well be the target of the shikari; Cf. Rudyard<br />

Kipling,Jungle Book,Mahwah (New Jersey),1985, pp. 4-5. If ‘man-eaters’ could not be found, they could be manufactured.<br />

Even normal tigers, if killed by the shikari by mistake, could be constructed as ‘man-eaters’! If shikar-texts are<br />

minutely examined, we find that many of the shikar expeditions against the ‘man-eaters’ clearly conform to a recognizable<br />

paradigm-the white shikari responding to the call of the helpless villagers and taking charge of the ‘bad tiger’. Percy<br />

Wyndham, who was the Collector of Mirzapur, the district with the reputation of being a first-rate shikar district, and<br />

later the Commissioner of the Kumaon Division, was more popularly known in the district as Bagmaroo sahib. He was<br />

ever ready with his rifle when the villagers complained to him about a tiger harassing them or playing havoc with their<br />

cattle in the village, Cf. Y. D. Gundevia, In the Districts of the Raj, Bombay, 1992, p. 167.<br />

15 Some of the earliest observers like Buchanan Hamilton who had traveled and botanized on the eastern shores of the Bay<br />

of Bengal, however, found the area full of luxuriant vegetation, Cf. David Arnold, op.cit., p. 84.<br />

16 Francois Bernier, Travels in the Mogul Empire, London, 1914, p. 24.<br />

567<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

was the death of Sir Hector Munro’s son in the Sundarbans in 1792. 17 Munro’s seizure by a tiger was<br />

a commemorated in Staffordshire ornaments and may well be the origin of the remarkable mechanical<br />

toy Tipu’s tiger, taken at the capture of Seringapatnam in 1799 and displayed in turn at the East India<br />

Companies offices, the Indian Office and since 1879 at the Victoria and Albert Museum. <strong>The</strong>re are certain<br />

marked differences between the Sundarban tiger or Bengal tiger and his cousin the Indian tiger. <strong>The</strong><br />

unique mangrove swamp and the special ecological effects of the tidal waters of the sea undeterred by<br />

any flow of fresh water have turned the Bengal tiger a born fighter and survivor. A special feature of the<br />

mangrove habitats is that its entire land mass gets submerged during a cyclone and the land animals have<br />

to play amphibious role. Here the tiger swims and swims very well.<br />

V. Tiger-Human Conflict in the Sundarbans in the Colonial Period<br />

<strong>The</strong> British colonial authorities were quick to grasp the point that the Sundarbans, if reclaimed, could be<br />

transformed into a revenue yielding area. We shall now turn to see how this motive to maximize revenue<br />

triggered off a period of tiger-human conflict in the Sundarbans. <strong>The</strong> history of reclaiming the Sundarbans<br />

forest is fascinating. At the time of British East India Company’s acquisition of political power in India<br />

the forests of the Sundarbans extended to the vicinity of Calcutta. <strong>The</strong> initial attempts of reclamation in<br />

the eighteenth century were unsuccessful. <strong>The</strong> reclamation work took off in full swing from the second<br />

decade of the nineteenth century. It was indeed a very difficult task. One of the major challenges came<br />

from the tigers. <strong>The</strong> land reclamation project achieved very little success due to the depredation of tigers.<br />

<strong>The</strong> coolies (workers) had to be accompanied by shikaris (hunters) who fired their guns occasionally<br />

to frighten away the tigers that abounded in the forest. <strong>The</strong> tiger often attacked the forest clearers and<br />

committed such fearful havoc that work had to be temporarily postponed at times. L.S.S. O’Malley<br />

recorded in the Bengal District Gazetteer:<br />

‘<strong>The</strong> writer has come across a well authenticated instance where such a man-eater charged into a line of<br />

some 6 or 8 men, working along a bund, at about 8 or 9am carried of a man in their midst’. 18 On many<br />

occasions the project had to be completely given up in the face of hostile tigers and the land already<br />

reclaimed would eventually again turn into jungle. 19<br />

17 Mackenzie, op.cit., op.cit., p. p. p. 179. 179.<br />

179.<br />

179.<br />

18 L.S.S. O’Malley, Bengal District Gazetteer, 24 Parganas, Calcutta, 1914, pp. 19-20.<br />

19 Thomas Bacon, First Impression and Studies from Nature in Hindustan, London, 1837, pp. 2-3. Bishop Heber arrived<br />

on the mouth of river Hooghly in 1823. Thomas Bacon reached the fringes of the Sundarbans on his way to Calcutta<br />

in 1831. Bacon’s account too confirms this trend. He noticed that though the adventurers had cleared small spaces and<br />

erected a few shabby houses, but tigers, more than once had driven out the enterprising settlers. He too found a flat and<br />

swampy shore with scattered tall trees and thick jungle. With a large glass he spotted something like deer grazing amid<br />

568


W.W.Hunter’s representation of the Sundarbans as a fearful place – ‘a sort of drowned land, covered with<br />

jungle, smitten by malaria, and infested by wild beasts’ - brought the earlier emergent descriptions of<br />

the area to its culmination. In his 60 page seminal essay, published in 1875, Hunter endorsed the earlier<br />

accounts and portrayed the Sundarbans as a sort of drowned land, broken up by swamps, intersected by<br />

a thousand river channels and maritime backwaters, but gradually dotted, as the traveler recedes from<br />

the seaboard, with clearings and patches of rice land. 20 <strong>The</strong> tract is one vast alluvial plain, where the<br />

process of land-formation has not yet ceased, he noted. <strong>The</strong> forest in the Sundarbans is very dense and<br />

walking on the jungle is difficult due to the swampy watery land, he opined. For a visitor every moment<br />

of his journey through the vast watery wilderness, with the tigers and crocodiles lurking here and there,<br />

was an exploration of the mystic tropical jungle. Some parts of the interior of the Sundarbans, in the<br />

past, were impenetrable (the southern interior). With trees and brushwood intertwined and dangerous<br />

looking creeks running into the darkness in all directions, the shimmering tidal waters bordered by the<br />

mangrove trees, it appeared to be a world of fantasy to Englishmen like Hunter. 21 <strong>The</strong> Sundarbans was<br />

yet another space where the European ‘selves’ and the Indian ‘other’ started interacting as entities that<br />

remained fundamentally the same at the end of the road. <strong>The</strong>y have dialectically constituted one another’s<br />

understanding or ideas of a given space. Thus the colonial constructions of the Sundarbans were hybrids<br />

that were partly colonial and partly indigenous and often neither of the two. <strong>The</strong> Raj in nature was neither<br />

wholly empire nor entirely native. <strong>The</strong> indigenous people of the Sundarbans too considered the terrain<br />

as difficult and dangerous, a place full of banda (bushes) and kada (mud) and infested with tigers and<br />

crocodiles. 22 Thus there were occasions when the indigenous and foreign perceptions were in tune with<br />

each other. <strong>The</strong> combinations often resulted in the creation of new ecological or environmental ideas<br />

relating to management and exploitation of the then little known natural world.<br />

To ensure smooth collection of forest revenue from the Sundarbans, it became very urgent to protect the<br />

lives of woodcutters. <strong>The</strong> woodcutters and honey gatherers entered the forest at a particular time of the<br />

year. A party of woodcutters usually consisted of 15/20 men and 1/2 fakirs. 23 None of them would go<br />

into the forest to cut wood unless accompanied by the fakir who is supposed to protect them from the<br />

tigers. 24 <strong>The</strong>y would start their work only after making an offering to the jungle deities like Ban Bibi or<br />

the swampy grassy place. He was told of instances of tigers swimming off from the coast to a considerable distance.<br />

20 W. W. W. Hunter,<br />

Hunter, Hunter, A Statistical Account of Bengal, Vol. I, District of 24 Parganas and Sundarbans, London, 1875, pp. 287-<br />

90.<br />

21 Ibid.<br />

22 Sibsankar Mitra, Sundarbaner Arjan Sardar (in Bengali), Kolkata, 1955, pp. 3-5.<br />

23 It is widely believed in the Sundarbans that the fakirs have the power to tame the tigers and thereby protect the people<br />

whom they would accompany.<br />

24 Hunter, op.cit., pp. 311-12.<br />

569<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Dakshin Roy. 25 <strong>The</strong> forest revenue from the area continued to rise though at a heavy cost. <strong>The</strong> Baramiyan<br />

was taking a heavy toll. Between 1881 and 1912 more than 2500 people were killed by the tigers in<br />

the Sundarbans. 26 <strong>The</strong> actual number was higher as only 50% of such cases were actually reported to<br />

the authorities. Moreover, the figure does not include the cases which were brought to the notice of the<br />

District Administration alone and not subsequently reported to the Forest Department. In 1885 alone,<br />

116 woodcutters were carried away from a single para or station and the work came to a standstill. 27<br />

<strong>The</strong> matter had reached such an alarming proportion, that the Secretary to the Government of India,<br />

Department of Revenue and Agriculture wrote to the Secretary to the Government of Bengal (No. 430 F,<br />

Dt. Simla, 1913):<br />

‘Apart from the loss of life, this state of affairs interferes greatly with the proper working of the<br />

valuable Sundarbans forest and the Government of India trusts that no efforts will be spared to<br />

reduce the number of these pests’. 28<br />

<strong>The</strong> government was convinced that all or most of the tigers of the Sundarbans were ‘man-eaters’ and the<br />

destruction in them of as many tigers as possible appeared to be the only way of lessening the number of<br />

casualties. But, the encounter with the beast, on the ground, was mostly left to the indigenous shikaris,<br />

who were always looked upon as incompetent, unskilled and effeminate. <strong>The</strong> government adopted<br />

a policy of rewards to induce the indigenous shikaris to destroy the tigers. Under the sanction of the<br />

government, in the notification dated the 16 th November, 1883, published in the Calcutta Gazette, the<br />

Rangers and Foresters in charge of the 8 chief revenue stations in the Sundarbans reserved forest, were<br />

authorized to pay rewards for killing tigers. In 1883 the amount of the reward was Rs. 50 for each full<br />

grown tiger and Rs. 10 for each tiger cub. <strong>The</strong> shikaris were required to produce the skin and skull of the<br />

animal to the forest officials to receive the reward. 29 <strong>The</strong> value of the reward was raised from time to time<br />

and any such increase in the value of the reward was intimately associated with fresh depredation by tigers<br />

in the jungle. In 1906, the amount of the reward was raised to Rs. 100 for each full grown tiger and Rs. 20<br />

for each tiger cub. Again in 1909 the amount was further raised to Rs. 200. This was done in view of the<br />

fact that more than 500 people lost their lives in the 36 months between 1906 and 1909. 30<br />

<strong>The</strong>re took place a large scale slaughter of this magnificent animal in the Sundarbans. This researcher<br />

25 Ibid.<br />

26 PRF, 1868-1921.<br />

27 PRF for 1884-85, p. 57.<br />

28 PRF for 1911-12, p. 9.<br />

29 PRF for 1883-84, p. 92.<br />

30 PRF for 1881-82 through 1912-13.<br />

570


has compiled a figure to demonstrate the magnitude of this large scale massacre of the tiger population<br />

with the direct patronage of the colonial government. Between 1881 and 1912 more than 2400 full grown<br />

tigers were killed in the Sundarbans. 31 As a part of the flat out attempt to wipe out the man-eaters of the<br />

Sundarbans, free tiger shooting passes were distributed to almost everyone who applied for it without<br />

paying any heed to the ability, skill, experience or even identity of those self-styled shikaris. According<br />

to one available estimate between 1918 and 1926, 298 free tiger shooting permits were issued to native<br />

shikaris. 32<br />

This policy of mass slaughter of tigers had only a moderate effect on the number of casualties. In fact,<br />

annual statistics of casualties at times showed an upward trend, though there can be little doubt that the<br />

tiger population in the Sundarbans continued to dwindle. By 1928 the Forest Department itself came to<br />

acknowledge that “tigers have become comparatively scarce in the Sundarbans Division” 33 and it decided<br />

to reduce the number of free tiger shooting permits. <strong>The</strong> authorities did not realize however, that, what<br />

was at issue was not the number of tigers in the jungle but the prey-predator gap which accounted for<br />

the attack on the woodcutters. <strong>The</strong> crux of the problem and the man-eating behavior of the animal could<br />

be attributed to the fast declining deer population, the natural prey of tigers. <strong>The</strong> shikaris ostensibly bent<br />

on shooting tigers for reward were unable to resist the temptation of shooting deer whenever they got<br />

a favourable opportunity. <strong>The</strong> official reports testify to the fact that deer poaching in the Sundarbans<br />

reached an alarming proportion between 1915 and 1940. In 1919, when there was a remarkable decrease<br />

in the number of persons killed by tigers the Conservator of Forest acknowledged this point in his annual<br />

report and emphasized on the necessity of keeping down deer poaching in the Sundarbans. 34 <strong>The</strong> Annual<br />

Report on Game Preservation for 1939 informs us that the permit holders were allowed to shoot one<br />

deer per trip and the number of deer killed in that year was 448. It was discovered later that the shooters<br />

wounded about 896 deer. <strong>The</strong> majority of which most probably, died in agony from maggot infested<br />

wounds. 35 Instances like this can be multiplied. Thus, the permit holders did shoot for meat or profit in the<br />

Sundarbans. <strong>The</strong> forest officials acknowledged in their reports that the number of guns licensed, in the<br />

village bordering the forest, was very considerable and that it was one of the root cause of deer poaching.<br />

One forest official lamented in 1919:<br />

It is now certain that had guns never been allowed so freely in former years, there would have been<br />

31 Ibid.<br />

32 PRF for 1918-19, 1926-27.<br />

PRF for 1918-19, 1926-27.<br />

33 PRF for 1928-29.<br />

PRF for 1928-29.<br />

34 PRF for 1916-17.<br />

PRF for 1916-17.<br />

35 Annual Report on Game Preservation in Bengal for the Year Ending 31 st March 1939, Calcutta, 1940, p. 9.<br />

571<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

sufficient game to ensure that the tigers did not take to man-eating and all loss of human life and<br />

revenue of previous years would never have occurred. 36<br />

Another factor which frequently contributed to the periodic enlargement of the prey predator gap was<br />

tropical cyclonic storms which bring tidal waves and floods in the Sundarbans. <strong>The</strong> monsoon in this<br />

part of Bengal consists of a series of cyclonic depressions, which follow each other in more or less close<br />

succession up the Bay of Bengal. <strong>The</strong> October cyclones are examples of the most intense tropical storms.<br />

Such cyclonic storms occasionally resulted in the flooding of the Sundarbans, thereby dwindling the deer<br />

population. 37 Such floods occurred in the Sundarbans in 1909 and again in 1919. <strong>The</strong> cyclone of 1919<br />

features prominently in the forest department records. In 1919, the authorities attributed the increase in<br />

the number of men killed by tigers to the cyclone which made natural food scarce. 38 <strong>The</strong> report states<br />

two incidents in which tigers climbed into sleeping shelters built on machans and the lifting of one of the<br />

inmates on each occasion. This aggressiveness, the report recorded, ‘is attributed to the fact that enormous<br />

number of deer was killed or drowned in the storm wave which accompanied the cyclone of October last,<br />

which upset the balance between tigers and their natural prey, and induced them to attack men. 39<br />

VI. Tiger-Human Conflict in the Sundarbans in the Post-colonial Era<br />

Today the Sundarbans is primarily known as a tiger reserve. Interestingly, the setting up of a tiger reserve<br />

and its maintenance in this unique mangrove swamp involved the handling of a whole range of unknowns<br />

and the production of new knowledge. It was imperative to find answers to a series of questions like how<br />

many square kilometers would be assigned to per tiger, what kind of plants would be preferred, how to<br />

ensure the availability of tigers’ natural food without causing any harm to the biodiversity of this unique<br />

zone, and so on. <strong>The</strong> Sundarbans Project Tiger itself was a project of managing an uncharted territory, but<br />

this endeavour, in turn, triggered off new problems, which were not anticipated.<br />

Politics, capitalism and science all function on global connections. Each enlarges its sweep to satisfy<br />

universal aspirations. But, as they move on they change and reshape themselves in the face of the on-<br />

ground local encounters. 40 In this section I will try to demonstrate how the post-colonial Sundarbans<br />

reserve can offer an excellent opportunity to test this encounter between the global and local and how the<br />

36 PRF for 1918-19.<br />

37 O’Malley, op.cit., p. p. 133.<br />

133.<br />

38 Annual Report on Game Preservation in Bengal for 1909-10, p. 20.<br />

39 Ibid., p. p. 1.<br />

1.<br />

40 Anna L. Tsing Tsing, Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection, Princeton, 2005, pp. 1-2.<br />

572


unpredictable effects of the global encounter across difference lead to the construction of new objects of<br />

knowledge which in its turn again call for management and investigation. 41<br />

Environmental awareness and environmental politics would be an ideal space to draw up a balance<br />

sheet of the achievements of the universal. It is in this particular domain that a rudimentary structure of<br />

globalization first started to surface in the post-Second <strong>World</strong> War era. <strong>The</strong> concept of ecology originated<br />

in the nineteenth century and was intended to cover the study of the supposed equilibrium between<br />

organisms and the external world. Ecology, however, was not considered as a very important science until<br />

after <strong>World</strong> War II. <strong>The</strong> emergence of the post-war North American urban industrial complex brought<br />

forth the large-scale development of ecological and environmental knowledge. In the 1950s and 1960s<br />

environmentalism had primarily remained as a social movement of the North. It made the North aware<br />

of the ongoing degradation of global environment and of the fact that the United States manufacture<br />

and sell across the globe a pesticide like the DDT that can eventually end up in the bodies of penguins<br />

living innocently at the South Pole. Environmentalism gradually adopted trans-boundary approaches in<br />

the 1970s and 1980s drawing recognition to problems like pollution, climate change, species loss that<br />

could not be contained in a single country. One of the earliest global manifestations of this environmental<br />

concern was the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm, Sweden in 1972<br />

and the subsequent launching of the United Nation’s Environment Programme. 42 When this campaign<br />

reached the South, the Northern conservation priorities like saving tigers, rescuing elephants or protecting<br />

biodiversities were superimposed on its environmental agenda.<br />

It was strongly urged by the European wildlife biologists that only in the forests of India and the mangrove<br />

swamps of Bangladesh were there tigers in sufficient numbers to warrant an effort to save this endangered<br />

species. At its Tenth General meeting in New Delhi in 1969, the International Union for Conservation<br />

of Nature resolved that the estimated 2000 members of the South Asian sub-species (Panthera Tigris)<br />

in India, East Pakistan, Nepal and Bhutan were a viable breeding population. <strong>The</strong> Indian political and<br />

scientific opinion too proved to be favourable. India imposed a ban on tiger shooting in 1970, the Wildlife<br />

Protection Act was passed in 1972, the Indian Board for Wildlife was set up in 1972 and the Project Tiger<br />

41 This issue of the engagement of the universal with the local has been approached by a number of scholars from various<br />

standpoints. Michael Adams (Beyond Yellowstone Conservation and Indigenous Rights in Australia and Sweden, in<br />

Garth Cant et al (eds), Discourses and Silences, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2005) saw the problem in terms of an interplay<br />

between the two fundamental aspects: human-nature relationship and western-indigenous relationship. He shows<br />

the two are linked. Other recent works like Gunnel Cederlof (ed.), Ecological Nationalisms, Delhi, 2006, too saw the<br />

problem as a contest between issues and spaces within and beyond the nation. Anna L. Tsing, Friction: An Ethnography<br />

of Global Connection, op.cit. saw it in terms of friction resulting in dialogues across difference, between the local and the<br />

universal.<br />

42 Donald Worster (ed.), <strong>The</strong> Ends of the Earth, Cambridge, 1988, Introduction.<br />

573<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

was launched in 1973 in 9 reserve forests. <strong>The</strong> Project Tiger initially started as a task force set up within<br />

the Indian Board of Wildlife chaired by Dr Karan Singh, Minister for Health and Family Planning. 43 It was<br />

precisely at this time that global voluntary groups made their way into the Indian environmental scene.<br />

Most important among them was the <strong>World</strong> Wildlife Fund or WWF. 44 <strong>The</strong> tiger proved to be good choice<br />

because of its existence in different regions across India. It helped to broaden the ecological scheme in<br />

various ways. Its protection also involved the protection of tiger’s natural food supply and it thereby<br />

helped to broaden the project in multiple directions in the future. Preserving India’s wildlife was integral<br />

to a nationalist project to save its emblem. Project Tiger played a key role in broadening ecological<br />

perspective. It was clearly a single-species scheme to start with, but the position accorded the tiger in the<br />

food chains generated a logic that took the scheme further and started flashing new light on other species<br />

like deer, lion, monkey, rhino and on water resources and vegetation as well.<br />

<strong>The</strong> implementation of the Project Tiger involved human displacement as many villages were removed<br />

from the buffer zone and people were allowed to remain only in a few buffer areas. Hundreds of people<br />

were removed for each tiger being protected. <strong>The</strong> ideal size of the reserves as suggested by international<br />

wildlife biologists would be 3000 square km, but India with an ever increasing population had no other<br />

option but to opt for less than 1500 square kilometers for each of these reserves on an average. In the<br />

case of Sundarbans the size is even smaller. <strong>The</strong> task force predicted that with the increase of the number<br />

of tigers they would eventually start roaming outside the core and the buffer zone. 45 In the case of<br />

Sundarbans and other reserves the prediction has come true. Clashes between Forest Department staff and<br />

the local villagers in the Sundarbans are very common. <strong>The</strong> root of these clashes range from poaching,<br />

fishing to human deaths caused by the intrusion of tigers.<br />

<strong>The</strong> conflict between humans and tigers in the Sundarbans also originates in the socio-economic condition<br />

of the local people and the man-eating habit 46 of the tigers. <strong>The</strong> per capita income in the Sundarbans is<br />

estimated to be less than half that of the state average. In the struggle for survival thousands of people<br />

enter the forest braving the crocodiles, sharks and tigers in order to gather honey, cut woods and catch<br />

fish. This brings them face to face with the tigers. Sometimes the tigers enter the villages near the buffer<br />

43 Paul Greenough, Pathogens, Pugmarks, Pugmarks, and and and Political Political Political ‘Emergency’, ‘Emergency’, ‘Emergency’, Paul Paul Paul Greenough Greenough Greenough and and and Anna Anna Anna L.Tsing L.Tsing L.Tsing (eds), (eds),<br />

(eds), Nature in<br />

the Global South, op.cit., pp. 201-230, also Mahesh Rangarajan, India’s Wildlife History, Delhi, 1997, pp. 94-107.<br />

44 Mahesh Rangarajan, op.cit.,op.cit.,pp.pp. 94-107. 94-107. 94-107. <strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong> WWF WWF WWF pledged pledged pledged over over over a a a million million million dollars dollars dollars to to to help help help save save save the the the tiger tiger tiger in in in Asia. Asia. Asia. Estab-<br />

Estab- Estab- Estab- Established<br />

in the early 1960s, the society was a major catalyst for governmental action in India, where the Indian Prime Minister<br />

readily agreed to personally supervise the project.<br />

45 Paul Greenough, op.cit., p. p. 211.<br />

211.<br />

46 This man-eating habit has been evoked by the periodic shortage of natural food-chain. <strong>The</strong> man-eating habit of the tigers<br />

in the Sundarbans, therefore, can be attributed to the unique biogeographic environment.<br />

574


zones and take away men, women or their cattle. It is a place where tigers kill hundreds of people a<br />

year, but since they are a protected species, killing a tiger that has been preying on a village brings in the<br />

government authorities to mete out punishment. Getting killed by a tiger was a terrifying prospect for the<br />

near and dear ones of the dead. <strong>The</strong> new widow and the victim’s children are forbidden to cry and taught<br />

to say their father had died of diarrhea because if exposed the family members are forced to pay for the<br />

dead trespasser and are treated like criminals.<br />

Amitav Ghosh in his remarkable prize-winning book Hungry Tide gives a graphic account of this conflict<br />

between the indigenous people of the Sundarbans on the one hand and the tiger on the other. He describes<br />

how a tiger was accidentally trapped in a livestock pen while trying to take away a calf. An angry mob<br />

quickly gathered and the incapacitated animal was attacked with sharpened staves. At first one of the<br />

boys thrust a sharpened bamboo pole through a window and blinded it. Piya, the American cetologist, the<br />

central character of the novel, tried her best to save the animal but in vain. She was helpless in the face of<br />

a hostile crowd. Even her associates Horen and Fokir sided with the mob and participated in the killing.<br />

Such occurrences are very common in the Sundarbans. <strong>The</strong> incidence described in the novel is illustrative<br />

of a fundamental and yet delicate issue that continues to surface prominently in the global debates relating<br />

to management of nature. <strong>The</strong> setting up of the tiger reserve led to the creation of a host of new unknowns<br />

including the human-tiger conflict. <strong>The</strong> conversation between Kanai and Piya regarding the killing of the<br />

tiger that followed later brings out the essence of the several flashpoints of this complex problem. 47<br />

<strong>The</strong> issue of the tiger-human conflict in the Sundarbans, depicted in the above story, has its roots in the<br />

policy pursued by both the colonial and the post-colonial state in India. <strong>The</strong> colonial forest policy, geared<br />

by global capitalism, led to the dislocation and degradation of the local people and the post-colonial<br />

project of tiger conservation further contributed to their misery. <strong>The</strong> forest policy of the post-colonial<br />

state has excluded the indigenous people from the Sundarbans tiger reserve. <strong>The</strong>y have been deprived<br />

of the right to use the forest and it has preserved the forest only for the animals. To avoid the hostilities<br />

of the local people towards the state policy of conservation, the involvement of resident people in the<br />

management of resources has been recommended by global agencies. <strong>The</strong> biosphere reserve programme<br />

and the conservation of tigers in the Sundarbans are based rhetorically on a highly participative approach<br />

of the local communities. But the on-ground implementation of the tiger conservation had neglected the<br />

enormous local knowledge about ecosystem and wildlife the people of Sundarbans have. Thus the gap<br />

47 Amitav Ghosh,<br />

Amitav Ghosh, <strong>The</strong> Hungry Tide, Delhi, 2004, pp. 289-295. <strong>The</strong> issue of tiger-human conflict in the Sundarbans is wellknown<br />

and an important issue in the debate relating to conservation. Amitav Ghosh, though a fiction writer, has undertaken<br />

extensive field-trips to the core area of the Sundarbans and there is ample evidence to show that it is an accurate<br />

depiction of reality. <strong>The</strong> present researcher has verified this during his field trips to the Sundarbans.<br />

575<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

between the universal official rhetoric of conservation and the actual formulation of policies aimed at<br />

empowering local communities has widened. <strong>The</strong> forest officials congratulate themselves on the rapid<br />

increase of tiger population but all is not well in the Sundarbans. Smugglers and poachers, supported by<br />

political and business interests and sheltered by local communities, raid the protected forests for valuable<br />

exports. 48 As the local people are hostile to the official conservators, the poachers operate with ease. State<br />

surveillance in the protected forest is mainly through the Forest Department, whose officials were known<br />

to exploit their position for private gain. <strong>The</strong>y played a pivotal role in poaching timber, deer meat and tiger<br />

skins. <strong>The</strong> Sundarbans also provided shelter for those who lived off river robbery and who exploited the<br />

existence of the border to develop two new specializations: kidnapping and piracy. 49<br />

Conclusion<br />

In the Sundarbans, the tiger has always been at the centre of the problem of managing this unique natural<br />

world and the problem of ordering the frictions between the local and the global has been essentially a<br />

problem of managing the tiger-human conflict. I have tried to demonstrate in this essay that this project<br />

of managing the tiger-human conflict has a long history. <strong>The</strong> structure of tiger-human conflict in the<br />

Sundarbans has undergone a qualitative transformation in the post- colonial era. In early British India<br />

the Sundarbans remained as a ‘mystic drowned land’, ‘dangerous’, ‘unknown’ and difficult to manage<br />

or order. In course of time however, the Europeans realized its potential as a hidden natural resource and<br />

took necessary measures to transform it into a revenue yielding forest. This job led them to embark upon<br />

the project of taming the tigers. But the task of taming the tigers was left in the hands of the indigenous<br />

shikaris (hunters). <strong>The</strong> British rulers were convinced that the local people armed with sound indigenous<br />

knowledge and would be better able to combat the man-eaters in this dangerous terrain. <strong>The</strong> post-<br />

colonial state, on the other hand, had excluded the local inhabitants and their knowledge in their project of<br />

conservation. To the locals, managing the tiger threat could have been simpler than facing intrusions of the<br />

colonial or the modern state at different points of history.<br />

48 Contemporary Indian newspapers like Anandabazar (Kolkata, India), <strong>The</strong> Statesman (Kolkata, India) and <strong>The</strong> Telegraph<br />

(Kolkata, India) are packed with relevant information regarding lawlessness and tiger poaching in the Sundarbans National<br />

Park. In the 1990s, the trade in the skin of Royal Bengal Tigers, was extremely lucrative as the Bangladeshi and<br />

Indian elites were prepared to pay large sums of money for this exclusive item of interior decoration. <strong>The</strong> situation in<br />

Indian and Bangladesh Sundarbans is more orless identical. Big Big cat is big business. business. China China functions as the manufacturing<br />

hub for medicines made from tiger body parts. <strong>The</strong> poaching boom in the Sundarbans can be attributed to this<br />

international Chinese medicine trade. After adequate processing in China, they are exported to UK, USA, Australia and<br />

Japan. According to one report, it may be possible to kill a tiger with the help of poachers by spending only 5,000 Indian<br />

rupees, which would fetch $50,000 from the international market; see <strong>The</strong> Times of India, October 12, 2005.<br />

49 Willem van Schendel, <strong>The</strong> Bengal Borderland: Beyond State and Nation in South Asia, London, 2005, p. 274.<br />

576


<strong>The</strong> shortsightedness of official conservation policy in independent India has reflected the disrespect<br />

for the enormous indigenous knowledge of the local communities in managing the tiger-threat. This<br />

indigenous knowledge is used by the officials when convenient and then discarded but never stored for<br />

use in the future. <strong>The</strong> relevance of traditional knowledge of biological resources needs to be understood<br />

in the context of the social and cultural milieu of the entire community including the surrounding habitats.<br />

But unfortunately, the local communities have never been asked to be a part of the decision-making<br />

process. <strong>The</strong> universal rhetoric of conservation and its implementation created new complexities which in<br />

their turn have alienated the local communities. This alienation of the indigenous people from the official<br />

project of conservation has made the new unanticipated crises more unmanageable in the Sundarbans.<br />

Professional foresters, wildlife biologists and other experts, who were involved in the policy making that<br />

led to the final implementation of the Project Tiger had failed to foresee the pervasiveness of the tiger-<br />

human conflict in the Sundarbans in the long run. <strong>The</strong> general impression that can be gathered from the<br />

official literature relating to the size and extent of the reserve may appear to be comprehensive in terms of<br />

classification or quantification. But the realities on the ground are different. <strong>The</strong> forces of industrialization<br />

in a globalised world have been continuously threatening this reserve in recent times. Ever increasing<br />

human settlements have occupied a large space in the buffer zones of the Sundarban National Park. <strong>The</strong><br />

decrease of fresh water flow has increased the salinity of water and seriously disturbed the ecosystem of<br />

the region. <strong>The</strong> increasing in flow of city effluents from the nearby city of Kolkata is further contributing<br />

to the problem. Its magnitude has become alarming, as a large number of water bodies in nearby urban<br />

areas that previously acted as natural filters, have disappeared as real estate promoters convert them into<br />

housing estates. As a result the city effluents are now directly received by the biosphere reserve and are<br />

causing great harm to the mangrove forest and the natural food chains. This is exerting some impact on<br />

the already existing man-eating habit of the Sundarban tiger and the consequential intensification of the<br />

tiger-human conflict in this mangrove forest. Species of fishes and other water lives may soon disappear<br />

in both Indian and Bangladesh Sundarbans. Even 150 years ago, the Sundarbans was the home to the one<br />

horn Indian rhino, the Javan rhino, wild buffaloes and river dolphins. All are now extinct. Interestingly<br />

enough, the problems like tiger-human conflict, species loss or the general degradation of the unique<br />

biogeographic environment of the Sundarbans took place under the ideological umbrella of the global<br />

projects like ‘biosphere reserve’, ‘project tiger’, or ‘eco-tourism’.<br />

Thus the interior of the Sundarbans and the ongoing changes therein, still remain unmanaged. <strong>The</strong><br />

intrusion of the colonial state, the implementation of the Project tiger by the post-colonial state or the<br />

introduction of the biosphere reserve programme under the forceful international pressure inflicted a new<br />

kind of misery on the local people of the Sundarbans and further aggravated the problem of tiger-human<br />

conflict. As far as the state responses to the issue of forest use were and are concerned, there seems to<br />

577<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

be little fundamental difference between the colonial and post-colonial state. To the locals, managing<br />

the tiger threat could have been simpler than handling the intrusions of the state at different points of<br />

history. During the Raj the slogan was ‘kill the tiger’ – but with the coming of the Project Tiger the slogan<br />

had changed into ‘save the tiger’, but the saving of the tiger was to be carried out again at the cost of a<br />

renewed tiger-human conflict in a far greater magnitude than ever before.<br />

578


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Parallel Session 3-2<br />

MEST/NRF: Healing <strong>Humanities</strong> in Korea<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> Policy and <strong>The</strong>ir Social Contributions in Korea<br />

/ Kidong Song (Ministry of Education, Science and Technology)<br />

2. <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy: <strong>The</strong>ory and Practice<br />

/ Young E. Rhee (Kangwon National University)<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> Division Trauma of Koreans and Orality Healing<br />

/ Jong Kun Kim (Konkuk University)<br />

4. Deficiency, Expression and Mind Healing: Focusing on Selective<br />

Mutism<br />

/ Sunmi Hong (Wonkwang University)


<strong>The</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> Policy and <strong>The</strong>ir Social Contributions in Korea<br />

Kidong Song<br />

Ministry of Education, Science and Technology<br />

I. Introduction<br />

1. Crises Facing Korean Society and the Humanistic Healing<br />

In December 2011, a fourteen-year-old boy jumped out of his apartment veranda, leaving behind a note<br />

describing vividly the horrible violence he had suffered for the previous nine months at school. Since<br />

then, Korean society has been undergoing the year of 2012, as before, in the turmoil of school violence.<br />

In addition, sexual crimes against children and youths have steeply increased in number from 857 in 2007<br />

to 2,053 in 2011. Sexual violence, where there was a case at Gwangju Inhwa School for the Hearing-<br />

Impaired in 2005, was reignited as a hot social issue by the film <strong>The</strong> Crucible, which was watched by<br />

about 4.6 million people. In addition to the direct violence, a number of socio-structural contradictions<br />

such as high rates of suicide and divorce as well as the polarization between the rich and the poor have<br />

caused sufferings to us all. How can these sufferings be healed?<br />

Billions of people in the world live a bustling life as they are born, grow old, get sick, and die. Although<br />

they are all mortal after a short span of life, the fact that they exist in this world for a certain period of<br />

time is undeniable. Whether high or low in social status, rich or poor, or even good or evil, each and every<br />

person has an equal right and valuable worth as human beings. In this sense, we have to give a warm<br />

helping hand constantly to the socially weak around us. 1 However, the reality is so formidable that a lot of<br />

people drop out of the social competition and become hostile to the society which frustrates them. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

1 Jeonju University News. 19 September 2012. Cited from a column written by Kim Seung-jong, Dean of the College of<br />

the <strong>Humanities</strong>: “<strong>The</strong> humanities are based on the spirit of love and care for the socially underprivileged, which ultimately<br />

leads us toward the road to true happiness.”<br />

581<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

never admit to their own lack of ability or regret their own faults; on the contrary, at every opportunity<br />

they undertake a bigger retaliation against those who are presumed to forsake them. How can our society<br />

control them? Can they be changed if we take such strong and harsh measures of punishments–such as<br />

electronic anklets, disclosure of offender profiles, life imprisonment, death penalty–or if we issue vouchers<br />

for households with low-income and in absolute poverty to guarantee the minimum cost of living for<br />

them? How can we “change people”? <strong>The</strong> answer lies in the humanities.<br />

<strong>The</strong> humanities are academic disciplines which aim at “understanding human beings.” 2 <strong>The</strong>y enable us<br />

to reflect on ourselves, then to care for others around us, and finally to accept their sufferings as our own.<br />

Experiencing others’ sufferings as our own—this is the true spirit of the humanities; it is also the only<br />

way to the fundamental solution of the contradictions of our society. 3 Since this virtue of sympathy is a<br />

capacity which is absolutely necessary for a meaningful human life not only for the underprivileged, but<br />

for ordinary people as well, a humanistic approach for all the people around us should be adopted on both<br />

social and governmental levels. <strong>The</strong> key to the fundamental change of Korean society is in the hand of the<br />

humanities.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> Crisis Facing the <strong>Humanities</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> humanities enable us to reflect on our own life and to realize what it is to live with self-respect as a<br />

human being. However, the socially weak who are caught up in living have almost no opportunity to be<br />

in contact with the humanities and think of themselves as having nothing to do with it. Ordinary people,<br />

who have a need for humanistic knowledge, also cannot afford to be engaged in the humanities because<br />

of the urgent problems of reality, such as improving grades, finding a job, and so on. In particular, the<br />

neoliberal logic of the market, which has expanded ever since the 1997 financial crisis, drastically altered<br />

the landscape of universities in Korea. Professors have been driven to so-called “achievement-oriented”<br />

methods, which hinges on the quantity of papers, while the presumably “unprofitable” disciplines, such<br />

as philosophy, history and literature, have gradually been turned away in society as college students have<br />

crowded to “profitable” majors. 4 This fact was demonstrated by a recent research—“An Analysis of the<br />

Actual Conditions of the <strong>Humanities</strong> Education and Its Promotion Measures” conducted by professor<br />

Hong Byung-sun—which analyzes the results of a survey of 2,000 high-school and college students on<br />

2 <strong>The</strong> notion of “humanities” is known to come from the Roman political thinker Cicero’s words, “the inquiry into man, the<br />

study of man.”<br />

3 Jeonju University News. 19 September 2012.<br />

4 According to statistics provided by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology in 2010, the average rate of<br />

enrollment in doctoral courses in the humanities and social sciences was 12.6%, compared to 21.3%-23.4 % in natural<br />

sciences and engineering during 2005-2008.<br />

582


the actual conditions and demand of humanities education. According to this research, although most<br />

high-school and college students in Korea recognize the necessity and importance of the humanities<br />

education and want to receive it, they hesitate or neglect to participate in it due to preparations for the<br />

college entrance examination for high-school students and grade management and job preparation for<br />

college students. 5 Given its fundamental quest for the essence and root of man, society and the world,<br />

the humanities is powerlessly turned away as being unable to promise immediate material rewards in<br />

the rapidly changing society of today despite its potential to bring about fundamental change in Korean<br />

society.<br />

3. A New Move of the <strong>Humanities</strong> for Social Change in Korea<br />

In recent years, new light began to be shed on the importance of the humanities among corporations<br />

and CEOs. According to a diagnosis done by Samsung Economic Research Institute, “in dealing with<br />

phenomena such as the global financial crisis, which are difficult to predict with statistical analysis<br />

techniques, humanistic insights have been the focus of attention as an alternative. <strong>The</strong> humanities, which<br />

inquires into human nature and stress a historical perspective, is a very powerful tool which can be used to<br />

predict future business environments.” In particular, the global financial crisis has made people reconsider<br />

the management system focused on financial engineering and technology and has increased the need to<br />

have a balanced humanistic thought. This kind of diagnosis explains why CEOs and executives of so<br />

many corporations are now absorbed in humanities studies. In fact, the humanities craze is becoming<br />

popular again; various humanities courses have recently been opened like the Supreme Leader Course at<br />

Seoul National University, the Advanced Program for Culture and Arts at Korea University, and so on. 6<br />

In addition, the online revival of the humanities is also remarkable. About twenty online communities<br />

and websites are active and accompanied by offline discussion or reading studies. <strong>The</strong>re are also other<br />

communities sponsored by book-related companies or operated by voluntary groups. Among the examples<br />

presented below, KB Rainbow <strong>Humanities</strong> provides a variety of humanistic contents including philosophy,<br />

films, and documentaries through a website and runs a series of columns on aesthetics, documentaries,<br />

philosophy, happiness study, architecture, cinema, etc.<br />

Now with the social need for the humanities revived, the development of the Internet and other IT<br />

5 “<strong>Humanities</strong> Education Neglected at High Schools and Universities: Because of University Entrance Exam and<br />

Preparation for Jobs.” Newsis. 14 February 2012.<br />

6 Samsung Economic Research Institute, “Future Management Alternative is Nothing But the <strong>Humanities</strong>,” Korea Herald<br />

Business. 23 February 2012.<br />

583<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

technologies broadens opportunities for academic content to be digitalized and shared by the general<br />

public as well as builds an environment in which consumers participate actively in the academic<br />

production through social media. With such a social atmosphere and technological advances, it is<br />

necessary to disseminate the humanities, which constitute the essence of human life and has been handed<br />

down to us by our ancestors. At the present moment, when the neglect of life and the blind pursuit<br />

of materialism prevail and social conflicts rapidly grow with the increase of the aged, early retirees,<br />

naturalized citizens, North Korean refugees, etc., the humanities is greatly needed as a forum in which we<br />

can explore some implications that different humanistic traditions from various cultures can have for the<br />

impending tasks facing the twenty-first century.<br />

1. <strong>Humanities</strong> Cafe: http://www.thinkntalk.net/<br />

<strong>Humanities</strong>-Related Online Communities and Websites<br />

2. Yes24 <strong>Humanities</strong> of Hope Campaign: http://inmun.yes24.com/main/index<br />

3. KB Rainbow <strong>Humanities</strong>: https://otalk.kbstar.com/quics?page=C025580<br />

4. POD CAST Choi Jin Gi’s <strong>Humanities</strong> Lectures: http://itunes.apple.com/kr/podcast/id459005831<br />

5. Art and Study: http://www.artnstudy.com/<br />

6. Moontak Network: http://moontak.cafe24.com/<br />

7. <strong>Humanities</strong> Museum: http://www.kmoh.org/kmoh_pro02a.html<br />

8. Book Academy Renai21: http://www.renai21.net/<br />

9. Bookstore Indigo: http://www.indigoground.net/<br />

10. Foundation Academia Platonica: http://www.platonacademy.org/<strong>Humanities</strong>Spread.php?method=spreadinfo&P<br />

HPSESSID=e3ea259b63133aad9dc07b9463e15e59<br />

11. “<strong>The</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> on the Street” Campaign by the National Library of Korea: http://www.nl.go.kr/tour/<br />

12. Jeongdong Art and Culture Academy: http://blog.daum.net/sangsangculture<br />

13. Inmun Cast: http://itunes.apple.com/kr/podcast/id493859279<br />

14. ePhilosophy: http://ephilosophy.kr/<br />

15. Community for Alternative Studies: http://www.ecoleerasmus.org/<br />

16. <strong>The</strong> Greenbee Publishing Co.: http://www.greenbee.co.kr/blog/<br />

17. Daejeon Cultural Action: http://www.djca.or.kr/djca_new/intro.htm<br />

18. Logos School: http://www.logosschool.co.kr/<br />

II. Policies for the Promotion of the <strong>Humanities</strong> in Korea<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> Objective of the Promotion of the <strong>Humanities</strong><br />

Policies for the promotion of the humanities, which are carried out by the Ministry of Education, Science<br />

and Technology, are based on the Sciences Promotion Act (former Sciences Promotion and Credit<br />

Guarantee, Etc. for Students Loans Act) and related regulations. <strong>The</strong> promotion of the humanities is part of<br />

584


the academic research promotion project. Its objectives are as follows: first, to foster world-class institutes<br />

of humanities and regional studies which perform socially relevant, interdisciplinary researches; and<br />

second, to expand the extent of the humanities by enhancing the communication between the humanities<br />

and the public and to lay grounds for a cultural nation by strengthening the social role of academics.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> History of the Promotion of the <strong>Humanities</strong><br />

After 1963 when the Ministry of Education (now called the Ministry of Education, Science and<br />

Technology) implemented the system of academic research assistance funds based on the education<br />

act, the support for research by professors in the fields of the humanities and social sciences began. <strong>The</strong><br />

launching of the Korea Research Foundation (now called the National Research Foundation of Korea)<br />

in 1981 in particular marked a moment when the current research support system in the fields came into<br />

existence.<br />

<strong>The</strong> year of 2007 was also a historical turning point for the promotion of the humanities. At the opening<br />

ceremony of <strong>Humanities</strong> Week in 2006, deans of humanities colleges from around the country declared “the<br />

crisis of the humanities” and announced their determination to promote them. After this, the <strong>Humanities</strong><br />

Promotion Program, estimated at 40 billion won a year, began in 2007. <strong>The</strong> representative projects are:<br />

support for the <strong>Humanities</strong> Korea (HK) project, support for humanities writings, and the popularization of<br />

the humanities.<br />

3. Budgets for Supporting the <strong>Humanities</strong> by Year<br />

<strong>The</strong> humanities-related budget provided by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (including<br />

support for humanistic research as basic studies) has continued to increase after 1963. From 2002, the<br />

budget for the fields of the humanities and social sciences has rapidly expanded: during the following ten<br />

years, an average of 91.6 billion won was funded annually through the project for fostering and supporting<br />

basic studies, while as of 2012, a total of more than 150 billion won is being invested for the promotion of<br />

research in the field of the humanities.<br />

585<br />

Session 5


y the government in universities. <strong>The</strong> National Research Foundation of Korea, Report on the Analysis<br />

of Research Activities at Universities (November 2011).<br />

4. <strong>The</strong> Effects of the <strong>Humanities</strong> Promotion Policy in Korea<br />

Owing to the sustained implementation of the humanities promotion policy, quantitative achievement in<br />

research in the fields of the humanities and social sciences has continued to increase. A case in point is<br />

that compared to 2004, the number of research papers in the fields increased by 65.2% in 2009 (23,334 in<br />

2004, while 38, 568 in 2009).<br />

Increasing Trend of the Number of Research Papers in Vnd Social Sciences 7<br />

587<br />

(Unit: Piece)<br />

In addition, as shown in the changing rates of the publications of research papers in international journals,<br />

the international research capacity of Korean researchers has also risen.<br />

Distribution of Research Paper Publications in the <strong>Humanities</strong> and Social Sciences during 2009-2011 8<br />

<strong>Humanities</strong> & Social Sciences 2009 2010 2011 Total<br />

SCI 104 (2.7%) 79 (2.3%) 245 (6.8%) 428<br />

non-SCI 3,380 3,335 3,341 10,056<br />

Total 3,484 3,414 3,586 10,484<br />

By fostering human resources in the humanities and establishing world-class institutes of humanities, the<br />

<strong>Humanities</strong> Korea project in particular has created a turning point for humanities research at universities<br />

to be expanded from department-centered to institute-based research. This project has set up the centers<br />

7 National Research Foundation of Korea. “Making the Knowledge Map of Academic Research in the <strong>Humanities</strong> and<br />

Social Sciences.” Policy Research Report (2010), p. 8.<br />

8 Data gathered from the research supporting systems of the National Research Foundation of Korea.<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

of gravity for research by taking the lead in research in the fields concerned. It also has changed the<br />

paradigm of research support and achievement in the humanities field: that is, the existing individual-<br />

centered academic research system has been transformed into a joint research system to solve problems in<br />

humanities through communication with society. <strong>The</strong> following diagram shows the achievements of these<br />

policy efforts in terms of the increase in humanities-related research papers and the cultivation of excellent<br />

future researchers.<br />

Achievements by the<br />

<strong>Humanities</strong> Korea<br />

Achievements by the <strong>Humanities</strong> Korea (HK) Project during 2007-2011<br />

Participating Researchers and<br />

Manpower Training Results<br />

<strong>The</strong> projects for the popularization of the humanities are intended to enhance communication with<br />

ordinary citizens by calling on humanities scholars at universities and research institutes to provide<br />

various lectures for the general public, including Lectures by Eminent Scholars in the <strong>Humanities</strong> 9 and<br />

<strong>Humanities</strong> Lectures for Citizens, 10 and by publishing a collection of humanities books. This project has<br />

raised citizens’ concern and awareness of the humanities and provided opportunities for them to have<br />

access to the humanities in their daily life. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> Lectures for Citizens in particular has become<br />

the Korean version of the Clemente Course 11 by conveying academic achievements in the humanities and<br />

9 <strong>Humanities</strong> lectures by eminent scholars are intended to enhance the public’s concern and understanding of the humanities<br />

by providing a series of open lectures and writings by Korea’s top-level humanities scholars. For four years since 2007,<br />

this project offered a total of 200 high-quality lectures with over 300 participants per lecture. It also provides digital<br />

content services through the Korean Research Memory (KRM), the website of the Lectures by Eminent Scholars in the<br />

<strong>Humanities</strong>, and the Korean Open Course Ware (KOCW) of the Korea Education and Research Information Service.<br />

10 <strong>Humanities</strong> lectures for citizens are designed to open and operate humanities lectures for a variety of socially<br />

underprivileged people including the youths, the disadvantaged (the homeless and prison inmates), and so on.<br />

11 <strong>The</strong> Clemente Course in the <strong>Humanities</strong> is a unique educational institution founded in 1995 to teach the humanities at the<br />

college level to the most disadvantaged in society including the homeless, the poor, prisoners, etc. Instead of mobilizing<br />

them for a job training, this course helps them reflect on their own life for themselves. By doing so, it seeks to enable<br />

them to gain self-respect, raise the quality of their own life, live an active life, and ultimately establish themselves as<br />

authentic citizens in society.<br />

588


social sciences to all walks of life, from general citizens to the disadvantaged. In addition, other various<br />

programs in the fields of the humanities and social sciences, including <strong>Humanities</strong> Week and the <strong>World</strong><br />

<strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong>, have expanded opportunities for the general public to enjoy the achievements in the<br />

fields.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Number of Participants in <strong>Humanities</strong> Week by Year<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total<br />

Organizations 14 22 16 15 33 100<br />

Individuals 30,000 34,000 38,000 40,000 55,127 197,127<br />

<strong>The</strong> Number of Participants in the First <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong> (November 2011)<br />

Invited<br />

Speakers<br />

Advance<br />

Registrees<br />

On-Site<br />

Registrees<br />

Academic<br />

VIP<br />

589<br />

Invitees<br />

by the<br />

Organizer<br />

(Unit: Person)<br />

PCO Staff Volunteers Total<br />

Domestic 29 366 1,017 2 87 15 15 40 1,571<br />

Foreign 27 9 7 1 4 - - - 48<br />

Total 56 375 1,024 3 91 15 15 40 1,619<br />

III. Healing and <strong>Humanities</strong><br />

1. Selection of the Subject<br />

As mentioned above, the humanities are academic disciplines which search for ways in which we live<br />

as authentic human beings by understanding ourselves and others. <strong>The</strong>refore, there is an inseparable<br />

relationship between the humanities and the notion of healing. In particular, in 2012 we can find around<br />

us a lot of people who get hurt. At the background against which we suffer from violence, isolation, and<br />

failures lie: conflicts caused by excessive competition; selfishness with little regard for others and the<br />

community; the unreasonable gap between the rich and the poor; poverty in abundance; maladjustment to<br />

rapid scientific and technological advancements and the consequent social divide; the crisis in the global<br />

environment; psychological unrests arising from ill adaptation to the rapidly changing social environment;<br />

and the isolation of individuals and discord between them as a result of the dismantlement of traditional<br />

communities. In this context, under the theme of “Healing and <strong>Humanities</strong>,” the Ministry of Education,<br />

Science and Technology is planning to hold <strong>Humanities</strong> Week from 29 October to 4 November and the<br />

Second <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong> from 1 to 3 November 2012. By reflecting on contemporary society<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

from the perspectives of the humanities, these projects are designed to search for alternatives that can<br />

heal the sufferings and wounds of individuals, society, and history. It is expected that these efforts will<br />

contribute to fostering deliberative individuals and a community of dignity through the humanistic<br />

reflection on self and the world. 12<br />

Under the theme of “Healing and <strong>Humanities</strong>,” we can think of the following questions:<br />

• What are the characteristics of contemporary society which gives us sufferings and wounds?<br />

• How can the sufferings be overcome and the wounds be healed?<br />

• What can the humanities do to heal the wounds of youths and give them hopes?<br />

• How do I have to live to achieve a harmonious coexistence between my neighbors, the community, and me?<br />

• What contributions can the humanities make to a meaningful life and the nation of dignity?<br />

• What can the humanities do for the “setting and development of world-historical agenda”?<br />

2. Cases of Putting “Healing and the <strong>Humanities</strong>” into Practice: <strong>Humanities</strong> Lectures for Citizens<br />

Recently, there was a report in the Dong-A Ilbo regarding a philosophy class at a middle school. <strong>The</strong><br />

uncontrollable behavior of middle school students in Korea are so notorious that there is even a joke that<br />

the North Korean military does not invade South Korea for fear of them. <strong>The</strong> students attend lectures on<br />

12 <strong>The</strong> Committee for the Popularization of the <strong>Humanities</strong>. “<strong>The</strong> Rationale for the Selection of the <strong>The</strong>me of ‘Healing and<br />

<strong>Humanities</strong>’ in 2012.”<br />

590


human violence and raise hands competitively to present their opinions about how to eliminate violence.<br />

Considering a survey result which shows that the primary reason for school violence is “just for fun,” the<br />

most important task now is to teach our children how to understand and sympathize with others. In 2011,<br />

this task was being put into practice by “Philosophical Lectures for the Caring and Healing of the Middle<br />

School Students Living in Vulnerable Areas,” one of the <strong>Humanities</strong> Lectures for Citizens projects for the<br />

popularization of the humanities. This project was carried out by professor Huh Woo-Sung of Kyung Hee<br />

University.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> Lectures of the Gayagol University of Hope for “Happy Village and a Happy Life”<br />

was undertaken by Dong-Eui University for the residents of Anchang village, a representative slum area<br />

located between Dong-gu and Jin-gu, Busan. In order to promote the participation of local residents,<br />

the project adopted a hands-on training method combining lectures, discussions and field trips under the<br />

themes of the local community, myself, life, and happiness. It was reported that this project contributed<br />

not only to enhancing the self-respect of the participants but also to making an atmosphere of consensus<br />

and communication between the university<br />

and the regional society. For example, a<br />

woman, who has always had a difficult life as<br />

she was a recipient of the government’s basic<br />

living subsidy, disabled, and a breast cancer<br />

survivor, said that she applied for the lectures<br />

to become happy and gained hope for life<br />

through them. This heartfelt statement makes<br />

us realize once again why the humanities are<br />

so urgent in our life.<br />

In addition, other cases, including <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy by the Institute of Human Sciences of Kangwon<br />

National University, <strong>Humanities</strong> for Unification by the <strong>Humanities</strong> Research Institute of Konkuk<br />

University, and Mind <strong>Humanities</strong> by the Institute of Mind <strong>Humanities</strong> of Wonkwang University, are also<br />

good examples illustrating how the humanities can heal our mind.<br />

IV. <strong>The</strong> Future of the <strong>Humanities</strong> Policy and Its Tasks in Korea<br />

In order for the humanities to meet the demands of “social responsibility” through its contributions to<br />

society, it must seek ways to communicate with the general public. It would not be authentic humanities<br />

if it stayed in an ivory tower without communicating with the public. <strong>The</strong> point is for the humanities to<br />

be “humanities for all,” which tends to people and embraces them. While the popularization project for<br />

591<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

the humanities has hitherto been focused on creating social demand for it and supporting spontaneous<br />

activities in various areas, from now on, an emphasis should be put on publicizing the importance and<br />

implications of the humanities rather than on providing humanities content. 13 <strong>The</strong> evaluation of existing<br />

projects and some directions toward which future projects should be implemented for the popularization<br />

of the humanities can be summarized as follows:<br />

<strong>The</strong> Medium and Long-Term Policies for the Popularization of the <strong>Humanities</strong><br />

Period Project Direction<br />

2006-2010<br />

2011-2013<br />

2014-2016<br />

<strong>The</strong> Trial Period for Popularization<br />

(Creation of Social Demands for the <strong>Humanities</strong> and Support for Spontaneous Activities in Various<br />

Areas)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Settle-Down Period for Popularization<br />

(Expansion of Social Demands and Systematization of Support)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Flourishing Period for Popularization<br />

(Active Responses to Social Demands)<br />

Social Networking Services (SNS) in particular will allow for various methods of communication and<br />

for the spread of information on the humanities. In order to facilitate close communication between<br />

the humanities and the masses and the dissemination of information on the humanities, the Ministry<br />

of Education, Science and Technology has operated websites, blogs, Twitter accounts, and Facebook<br />

accounts since October 2012. <strong>The</strong> ministry is now introducing humanities lectures, providing information<br />

on the humanities and holding various public participation events including the contest of essay reviewing<br />

lectures.<br />

- Website: inmunlove.nrf.re.kr<br />

- Naver Blog: blog.naver.com/inmun_love<br />

- Twitter: twitter.com/univinmest<br />

- Facebook: www.facebook.com/inmunlove<br />

* <strong>The</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> Popularization Logo<br />

SNS Websites for the Popularization of the <strong>Humanities</strong><br />

13 Choi Hwan-jin. Evaluation of the <strong>Humanities</strong> Popularization Project and Some Suggestions for Its Directions in the<br />

Future (National Research Foundation of Korea, 2011).<br />

592


In addition, it is necessary to extend video services, which are provided only for the Lectures by Eminent<br />

Scholars in the <strong>Humanities</strong>, to the <strong>Humanities</strong> Lectures for Citizens in order to allow everyone free access<br />

to humanities content. Consider the case of the singer Psy, who rose to the rank of global star with the<br />

song “Gangnam Style” through YouTube, and the case of TED 14 through which a huge number of people<br />

throughout the world can enjoy high-level lectures for free anytime and anywhere. Given the powerful<br />

influence of free digital content, it is time to devise ways to utilize them.<br />

In order to make integrated use of humanities’ assets (including persons, cultural properties, lectures,<br />

hands-on programs, festivals, etc.) and to strengthen ties with local governments through a linkage<br />

between regional cultural programs and academic activities, the “<strong>Humanities</strong> City” project was launched<br />

on a pilot basis this year. This project can be said to be a Korean version of the “European Capital of<br />

Culture” series by the European Union and the U. S. project “We the People” designed by the National<br />

Endowment for the <strong>Humanities</strong> (NEH) to explore significant events and themes in the American history.<br />

It is expected that Suwon and Tongyeong, designated first as humanities cities this year, will provide<br />

opportunities to excavate local humanities assets and allow citizens of the regions to be healed through the<br />

humanities.<br />

After its inception in 2011, the Second <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong> will proceed in a more developed format<br />

in 2012. While the first forum was a ground on which distinguished scholars from around the world<br />

discussed the philosophical foundation and social role of the humanities under the theme of “Universalism<br />

in a Multicultural <strong>World</strong>,” the second forum will deal with the practical contributions of the humanities<br />

under the main theme of “<strong>Humanities</strong> and Healing.” It is also expected to discuss the establishment of<br />

a system of cooperation between nations at the roundtable on the promotion of the humanities in each<br />

country. In the future, the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong> will require a multidimensional approach which<br />

combines both academic and popular traits. Also, in order for Korea to be a key player in the international<br />

initiative in the field of the humanities, it is worth attempting to designate a “<strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> Week” by<br />

14 TED (Technology, Entertainment and Design) is a global set of conferences owned by the private non-profit Sapling<br />

Foundation, formed to disseminate “ideas worth spreading.” TED was founded in 1984 as a one-off event. <strong>The</strong> annual<br />

conference began in 1990, in Monterey, California. TED’s early emphasis was technology and design, consistent with<br />

its origins in the Silicon Valley. <strong>The</strong> events are now held in Long Beach and Palm Springs in the U.S. and in Europe and<br />

Asia, offering live streaming of the talks. <strong>The</strong>y address a wide range of topics within the research and practice of science<br />

and culture, often through storytelling. <strong>The</strong> speakers are given a maximum of 18 minutes to present their ideas in the<br />

most innovative and engaging ways they can. Past presenters include Bill Clinton, Jane Goodall, Malcolm Gladwell, Al<br />

Gore, Gordon Brown, Richard Dawkins, Rodney Mullen, Bill Gates, educator Salman Khan, Google founders Larry<br />

Page and Sergey Brin, and many Nobel Prize winners. TED’s current curator is the British former computer journalist<br />

and magazine publisher Chris Anderson. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TED_(conference)<br />

593<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

the Korean government in cooperation with UNESCO. Along with “International Arts Education Week,”<br />

which will be jointly undertaken by the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism and UNESCO, this<br />

effort will contribute to creating Korea’s world leadership in the field. In addition, since a high-level of<br />

participation from around the world is essential for the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong> to build up recognition<br />

as an international event in the field of the humanities, it is necessary to actively taking advantage of all<br />

the official diplomatic channels including UNESCO, the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology,<br />

the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, overseas Korean embassies, and so on.<br />

Recently, the international credibility of the Korean economy and its future is rising rapidly. In the<br />

uncertain global economic environment of today, Korea’s real ability to perform a leading role in the<br />

world comes from the Korean people. In this sense, we can expect that the spirit of the humanities will be<br />

able to help us enrich our soul and enhance the dignity of our country.<br />

594


<strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy: <strong>The</strong>ory and Practice<br />

Young E. Rhee<br />

Kangwon National University<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Various statistics show that there is a correlative relationship between national income and happiness<br />

index, which stands true only until a certain critical point of national income but beyond that point they<br />

do not affect each other. According to <strong>World</strong> Bank statistics in 2011, Korea ranked 14th in terms of<br />

GDP. According to 2012 OECD health statistics, the average Korean lived 80.7 years as of 2010, which<br />

was 0.9 years longer than the OECD average of 79.8 years. However, Korea ranked first in the world in<br />

terms of death by suicide, with 33.5 people out of 100 thousand taking their lives, which was 12.8 more<br />

people than the OECD average.<br />

Keynes explained the phenomenon of “poverty midst plenty” as being a phenomenon where<br />

productivity increases but inventory is accumulated due to lack of demand, resulting in higher<br />

unemployment. Modern governments seem to have succeeded in overcoming the structural poverty<br />

Keynes pointed out but are now faced with another more serious form of poverty, which is “mental<br />

poverty midst materialistic plenty.” <strong>The</strong> gap between materialistic abundance and mental abundance<br />

cannot be resolved with Keynes’ policy of overcoming poverty. This shows why modern man is<br />

suffering from various mental problems despite living in unprecedented abundance. <strong>The</strong> first version<br />

of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) published in 1952 listed 106 types<br />

of mental disorders, but DSM-IV published in 1994 categorized as many as 297 types. We face<br />

the paradoxical situation in which the types of mental disorders are increasing as more scientific<br />

development is made and civilization progresses.<br />

It is clear that the quality of human life cannot be improved without resolving the mental poverty<br />

amidst material abundance. Material abundance may be achieved through revolutions in science,<br />

technology, social institutions, but mental poverty cannot be healed through those ways only. How can<br />

595<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

the imbalance between mental and material be solved? Mental poverty and the disease of mind are<br />

human illnesses and existential illnesses which are unrelated to materialistic abundance, so they must<br />

be understood, explained, and healed from a humanities perspective. <strong>The</strong>n, how can humanities achieve<br />

this goal?<br />

<strong>The</strong> purpose of this paper is to provide my answers to those questions. I shall introduce humanities<br />

therapy as a powerful way to heal depression and other diseases of mind now spreading throughout<br />

the world across generations, races, and nations. I shall review the theory and methods of humanities<br />

therapy, thereby suggesting its identity (what) and method (how). My discussions will go as follows.<br />

First, in section two, I shall introduce the origin and agenda of humanities therapy and Kangwon<br />

National University’s <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy Project. In section three, I shall explain the diseases of<br />

the mind as the object of humanities therapy, and examine their types and characteristics, and a brief<br />

diagnosis system. Sections four and five shall discuss the methods of humanities therapy. In section<br />

four, I shall introduce the teleological model as a specific model for humanities theory, and in the<br />

following section five I shall describe a specific case of how humanities therapy was applied clinically.<br />

2. <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy<br />

<strong>Humanities</strong> therapy is a reaction to the global problem of the mental poverty among material abundance<br />

and also a product specific to contemporary Korea. Korean humanities scholars were alarmed by the<br />

phenomenon that traditional values of humanities were slowly and steadily disappearing in the world’s<br />

leading global IT environment. In 2006, Korean university professors announced the “crisis of Korean<br />

humanities.” Following this announcement, various diagnostics were suggested on how humanities<br />

came to the point of crisis, and the <strong>Humanities</strong> Korea project was started in 2007 as a governmental<br />

solution. 1<br />

Against this background, the notion of humanities therapy was introduced in 2007 through the<br />

<strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy Project in Kangwon National University. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy Project<br />

introduced humanities therapy as an academic discipline with theoretical foundations and not as just<br />

a technique to treat the disease of mind. <strong>The</strong> official agenda of the <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy Project is<br />

“‘<strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy’ for Promoting <strong>Humanities</strong>.” <strong>The</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy Project suggested the<br />

following normative rationales for our society to study humanities therapy. 2<br />

1 Refer to Young E. Rhee (2011) for more information on how humanities therapy was created in Korea.<br />

2 <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy Project of Kangwon National University (2007).<br />

596


• Personal mental crisis and the growth of pathological phenomena in modern societies<br />

• Isolation from society and crisis of humanities<br />

• Misunderstanding of humanities<br />

• Academic closing of humanities<br />

• Minor role that humanities takes in the plan of regional and national development<br />

As seen above, humanities therapy was first suggested as a study not only with a purpose of healing<br />

mental diseases rife in modern society, through this kind of activity, but also with a secondary purpose<br />

of reviving and recreating the value of humanities to overcome the humanities crisis. It will not be easy<br />

to establish humanities therapy as a new academic discipline, so that much preparation will be needed<br />

for its establishment as an academic area.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy Project of Kangwon National University defines humanities therapy as the<br />

following:<br />

<strong>Humanities</strong> therapy is a new discipline that aims to develop practical humanities therapy contents by<br />

integrating therapeutic parts of literature, philosophy, language, and art in order to achieve the final goal<br />

of mental well-being. 3<br />

Following the definition above, the <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy Project of Kangwon National University<br />

is composed of philosophy therapy, literature therapy, language therapy, arts therapy, and history of<br />

therapy. <strong>The</strong> project’s task is to unite the studies done in five parts and to create humanities therapy as a<br />

discipline.<br />

An academic field with therapeutic purpose gains specific identity through making its target and<br />

method concrete, so the more unique its target and method, the clearer its identity is. <strong>The</strong> term “therapy”<br />

appeared in humanities therapy does not exactly correspond to the term used in medical treatment,<br />

but the theory and method may be specifically applied to reality through practical activities and its<br />

effectiveness will be proven. From this perspective, humanities therapy is a good example of practical<br />

humanities. For the past five years, the <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy Project of Kangwon National University<br />

has, through its research and practice, successfully spread the significance and necessity for humanities<br />

therapy both at home and abroad. As a result, the <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy Project is planning to set up a<br />

humanities therapy course at the graduate level and the <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy Agency of Kyungpook<br />

3 Ibid.<br />

597<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

National University plans to set up an interdepartmental course at the undergraduate level. As such,<br />

humanities therapy will soon be officially taught in Korean universities.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy Project of Kangwon National University has hosted annual international<br />

conferences on humanities therapy. During the 2012 conference in particular, it hosted the 11th<br />

International Conference on Philosophical Practice (ICPP). 4 <strong>The</strong> 11th ICPP was opened under the<br />

theme of “<strong>The</strong> Multiplicity of <strong>The</strong>rapeutic Practice in Philosophy and <strong>Humanities</strong>” for four days and<br />

45 scholars from 24 countries abroad along with 30 Korean scholars. <strong>The</strong>re were four keynote lectures<br />

and 80 presentations made to discuss in depth the therapeutic role which philosophy and humanities<br />

have in modern society. <strong>The</strong> conference not only provided a venue in which humanities therapy and<br />

philosophical practice could be combined, but also an opportunity to review the theories and methods<br />

of humanities therapy developed so far.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy Project of Kangwon National University used theories and methods developed<br />

in various therapeutic activities in elementary schools, local welfare centers, military camps, prisons,<br />

and North Korean Refugee Centers. <strong>The</strong> materials collected through these practical activities provided<br />

the basis to confirm and revise those therapies, methods, and models. During the third stage of research<br />

started from 2013, the <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy Project will categorize the humanities therapy contents by<br />

humanities studies and complete the task of establishing a humanities therapy discipline. 5<br />

I have so far briefly explained how humanities therapy was first created and developed so far, around<br />

<strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy Project of Kangwon National University. Below, I will discuss the object and<br />

method of humanities therapy.<br />

3. Disease of Mind<br />

<strong>The</strong> object of humanities therapy is people suffering from disease of mind. <strong>The</strong>n, what exactly is<br />

disease of mind? <strong>The</strong> disease of mind discussed in this paper is different from mental illness or mental<br />

disorder and is used more broadly. This broad concept of disease of mind stands opposite to the broad<br />

concept of health, which can be found in the <strong>World</strong> Health Organization (WHO) Charter (1946).<br />

4 For more information on the 11th International Conference on Philosophical Practice & the HT2012, refer to website www.<br />

ht21c.org.<br />

5 For more information on <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy Project, Kangwon National University, refer to website http://www.humantherapy.<br />

co.kr.<br />

598


Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of<br />

disease or infirmity.<br />

Let us define “disease of body” as a state where physical well-being, as written in the WHO charter, has<br />

been disturbed; and “disease of mind” as a state where the mental and social well-being has not been<br />

fulfilled. 6 We know from experience that mental diseases have many different aspects. Youngjin Kim<br />

(2004) classified diseases as physical disease, mental disease, and philosophical disease. 7 According to<br />

his classification, mental disease may be approached from psychiatric aspect and philosophical aspect.<br />

For example, depression is a representative mental disease of modern man. Scientists say that severe<br />

depression occurs when dopamine, a kind of neurotransmitter, is secreted less than the average amount.<br />

If this explanation is correct, then drugs like Prozac may be used to control dopamine secretion and<br />

control severe depression. Albeit obvious, not all mental diseases may be subject to humanities therapy,<br />

and people who secrete small amounts of dopamine by nature, should get psychiatric help. However,<br />

it does not mean that all depression patients are in need of psychiatric help. Marinoff points out that<br />

depression has the following four aspects: 8 (a) problem with the brain, (b) side-effect of amphetamine<br />

and alcohol, (c) trauma during youth, (d) severe moral or financial dilemma. According to Marinoff,<br />

(a) and (b) are cases that need psychiatric help and (c) is subject to psychological treatment and<br />

philosophical counseling and (d) can receive philosophical counseling. If depression has such diverse<br />

aspects, then we would not be able to treat that disease by emphasizing just one aspect. <strong>The</strong> main object<br />

of humanities therapy is philosophical disease as defined by Kim and (d) as classified by Marinoff.<br />

Here we find the justification and need for humanities therapy.<br />

<strong>The</strong> disease of mind as the second level, that is, philosophical disease, is an existential disease that man<br />

suffers from having to live as a human. One must understand its causes in order to treat philosophical<br />

disease. Philosophical disease may be classified as the following: 9<br />

• Ontological cause: loss of purpose in life, confusion in world view<br />

• Epistemic cause: error in perception, error from ignorance, misuse of knowledge<br />

• Logical cause: formal fallacy, informal fallacy<br />

6 I am not saying that body and mind can strictly be separated just because the disease of body and mind can be distinguished.<br />

<strong>The</strong> notion of disease of mind in this paper is based on the theory of embodied mind that is actively being discussed in cognitive<br />

science recently. For more information on the theory, refer to A. Clark and D. Chalmers (1996), F. Valera, E. Thompson, E.<br />

Rosch (1991), Young E. Rhee (20008a, 2010b).<br />

7 Kim Youngjin (2004), pp. 36-37.<br />

8 L. Marinoff (1999), pp. 32-34.<br />

9 Young E. Rhee (2010), p. 40.<br />

599<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

• Moral cause: loss of morality, lack of moral judgment standard<br />

• Aesthetic cause: loss of aesthetic sense, lack of aesthetic judgment standard<br />

<strong>The</strong> system introduced above incorporates the traditional fields of philosophy in order to classify and<br />

diagnose philosophical disease. Other humanities disciplines including literature have their own system<br />

of understanding human life, so they might suggest different classifications from the above one. Some<br />

might be concerned about the conceptual confusions that could occur if every humanities discipline<br />

introduces its own classification, but that is an unfounded worrying. Considering the fundamental and<br />

comprehensive nature of humanities, we should think of the variety in classification as an advantage<br />

and not as a weakness. In this case, we need to remember that humanities is not science (this does<br />

not necessarily mean that it contrasts with science either). In order to explain human life, diversities<br />

found in theoretical level and methodological level are essential conditions to understand and heal<br />

philosophical disease.<br />

Philosophical disease is a disease suffered by the average man. <strong>The</strong>refore, we cannot call it a disease or<br />

disorder in ordinary meaning and we should not call a person with philosophical disease a “patient.” A<br />

person suffering from philosophical disease, on the one hand, is not clearly a patient, but on the other<br />

hand he is ailing from an existential disease, so conversely speaking, he is a true patient. Kim states<br />

that philosophical disease is more value-oriented than physical disease or psychiatric disease, and<br />

causes more suffering to others rather than the patient himself. From this perspective, philosophical<br />

disease appears as a social pathology. Kim lists Korea’s unique examples of philosophical diseases<br />

as chauvinistic nationalism, filial piety egoism, gang activities, distorted Juche ideology, loyalty,<br />

ostracism, etc. 10<br />

From this perspective, objects for philosophical disease can be societies as well as individuals. We have<br />

seen through history how a specific society lost social health for a certain period of time and showed<br />

pathological phenomena, for example, Hitler-led Germany from 1933 to 1945 and American society<br />

from 1950 to 1954 swept by McCarthyism. Many scholars have diagnosed the cause of philosophical<br />

disease of modern society. For example, Marcuse pointed out in One-Dimensional Man (1964) that<br />

Western society had developed an “overconsumption disease.” <strong>The</strong> public in a consumption-centered<br />

society were dazzled by advertisements and promotions and pursued objects that could fulfill their<br />

unnecessary needs, and gave up their dream of a better society that could have been achieved otherwise.<br />

Meanwhile, Byung-Chul Han stated in Tired Society (Müdigkeitgesellschaft, 2010) that modern man<br />

10 Kim Youngjin (2004), p. 37.<br />

600


was living in an achievement society where endless positivity was acknowledged. Whereas traditional<br />

society produced lunatics and criminals, achievement society gave birth to depressed patients and<br />

loser due to the pressure to achieve. How could the disease of Korean society that has played a role in<br />

ranking Korea first in terms of suicide be explained? As Marcuse diagnosed, the cause of our society’s<br />

disease might be due to economic, mental bankruptcy from overconsumption. Or, the primary cause<br />

of suicide might be depression, and as Han diagnosed, 11 depression cannot only be analyzed from the<br />

perspective of “economy of self,” but be seen in the context of society. What has become clear through<br />

Marcuse and Han is that the causes of philosophical disease lie in social structure and that an effective<br />

way to heal philosophical disease is to approach it at both the individual and social levels, and that the<br />

focus should be on prevention rather than treatment.<br />

4. Teleological Model<br />

Until now we have examined the disease of mind and in particular philosophical disease as the object<br />

for humanities therapy. With this, we have answered the what-question. Now, let us take a look at the<br />

how-question. How can we treat philosophical disease?<br />

<strong>The</strong> therapy model that I will introduce in this paper is the “teleological model”. My model is based on<br />

two theories, which are the theory of embodied mind and the teleological explanation on action. I will<br />

briefly go over the two theories, and then discuss the teleological model.<br />

<strong>The</strong> theory of embodied mind understands the mind in relation to the body and the environment<br />

where the body lies. <strong>The</strong> argument that the mind is embodied must be understood ontologically and<br />

epistemologically. <strong>The</strong> mind is embodied ontologically means that the mind is made in the biological<br />

base of brain and nervous system, and therefore, this implies epistemologically that the body’s<br />

function must be considered in order to fully understand the mind. Because of this characteristic, the<br />

embodied mind theory contrasts with the substance dualism, which strictly separates the body and<br />

mind, or physicalism that considers the two as equal, but it can be compatible with property dualism<br />

or functionalism. 12 <strong>The</strong> embodied mind theory also emphasizes the role of environment where the<br />

mind and body function. If the body plays an important role in the process of cognition, then the<br />

11 Han Byung-Chul (2010), p. 26.<br />

12 <strong>The</strong>re are different versions of embodiment. For example, Damasio (1999, 2003) and Edelman (2004) bases embodiment on<br />

non-reductionist property dualism but Clark’s embodiment is closer to functionalism. Cognitive science has been dominated<br />

by symbolism and connectionism since the 1970s. <strong>The</strong> embodied mind theory is fast rising as a third research program in the<br />

field of cognitive theory since the 1990s. <strong>The</strong> embodied mind theory is also called the embodied cognition, extended cognition,<br />

distributed cognition, situated cognition theory.<br />

601<br />

Session 5


PI scheme can be applied to explain suicide in the following way:<br />

• Tom intends to save his reputation.<br />

• Tom considers that he cannot save his reputation unless he commit suicide.<br />

• <strong>The</strong>refore, Tom attempts suicide.<br />

If someone asks why Tom tried to commit suicide, the proper explanation for it is that Tome tried to<br />

save his reputation by committing suicide.<br />

Von Wright’s PI scheme was proposed to explain action, but we may apply it as a therapy model. When<br />

the embodied mind theory and von Wright’s PI scheme are combined, we get the frame for teleological<br />

model of therapy. 15 <strong>The</strong> teleological model has the following four therapy steps:<br />

• Step 1: Write the world one is in.<br />

- Physical environment<br />

- Mental environment<br />

- Social environment<br />

• Step 2: Identify one’s purpose, intentionality, and intention.<br />

- Is p a real purpose or intentional object?<br />

- Is p a mid-point purpose and not the final one?<br />

- Is p worth pursuing?<br />

• Step 3: Write one’s moral principles or virtue system.<br />

Here therapist’s task is to help the visitor to start from the specific world written and reflect on the path<br />

to achieving purpose using the moral principle and virtue system. For the therapy to be successful, not<br />

only therapist’s skilled experience, but also the wisdom and willpower of the patient are also required.<br />

• Step 4: <strong>The</strong> visitor determines if the path he had thought of in the previous step is the true solution,<br />

and shares the results of the therapy with her society.<br />

One of the common and fatal problems that occur in counseling is that counseling ends when therapist<br />

15 Young R. <strong>The</strong>e (2012).<br />

603<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

thinks that visitor’s problem has been resolved, and that visitor herself also acknowledges that. But<br />

philosophical therapy may be not be terminated at that point, mainly because the solution that visitor<br />

thought of might be temporary or superficial, and not a real solution. With time, visitor may realize that<br />

her problem still remains. This occurs when visitor did not go through sufficient reflections in each step.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, visitor must always go through the process of reflecting whether her problem has been truly<br />

resolved. When visitor’s problem has been truly resolved, she is obliged to share her experience with<br />

other people, and in this sense, visitor who has completed therapy, is already a humanities therapist. By<br />

sharing her experience with others she participates in increasing the health of her society.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are worksheets used in humanities therapy with the teleological model. Below is a basic<br />

worksheet used in the beginning stage of counseling.<br />

• Physical Environment<br />

• Psychological Environment<br />

• Social Environment<br />

Worksheet<br />

• _______________________________________ / reason (principle, virtue)<br />

• _______________________________________ / reason<br />

• _______________________________________ / reason<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

• Purpose<br />

5. Case Study<br />

For the past five years, I have applied the teleological model to military soldiers and prisoners, and<br />

tested its validity and efficiency and updated the model. Below is a therapy case report of a soldier<br />

who experienced serious difficulty in adjusting to military camp life. I have not used his real name,<br />

following counseling rules.<br />

* * *<br />

When I met Corporal Kim Cheolsu, he was 23 years old. He was of small stature and dark complexion,<br />

604


and looked nervous. I held 13 counseling sessions with Corporal Kim over the course of one year.<br />

<strong>The</strong> first three sessions were spent understanding Corporal Kim’s situation, and with the exception of<br />

the last session, nine sessions were allocated to exploring a path from Corporal Kim’s situation to his<br />

purpose.<br />

Corporal Kim received boot training and was assigned to an infantry division artillery regiment in the<br />

frontline. Corporal Kim said that he and everyone at camp faced serious problems from the day he<br />

arrived at there. <strong>The</strong> first problem was that Corporal Kim had a weak physique and could not adjust<br />

to the artillery regiment. Corporal Kim weighed 59kg, so it was difficult for him to carry artillery<br />

weighing 20-80kg. His weakness was often pointed out during military training. His low training score<br />

gradually made him an outsider to his comrades. Fellow comrades who shared barracks with him<br />

stopped talking to him, and Corporal Kim started to become more stressed. When the problem became<br />

severe and evident, his battalion commander moved him to administrative division, but he could not<br />

adjust there either. Having dropped out of high school, he did not know well how to do administrative<br />

work and people ignored him, making it difficult to do work. <strong>The</strong> battalion commander then assigned<br />

him to ammunition management team, but he was detained at the guard house because he smoked near<br />

the ammunition storage during his duty. Lastly, he was assigned to the kitchen, but he got into many<br />

fights with lower ranking soldiers who ignored him, so in the end he was assigned to miscellaneous<br />

tasks without a specific position. Corporal Kim told those around him that he was deeply hurt by this<br />

and that he felt suicidal urges. That is when I met Corporal Kim.<br />

Through counseling I learned about Corporal Kim’s family situation and his childhood. Corporal Kim’s<br />

father had worked in a big company, but he continued to fail in stock investments, went bankrupt, and<br />

became an alcoholic. He was violent towards his family and tried to poison himself several times. When<br />

Corporal Kim was in fourth grade, his mother ran away from home because of the repeated violence of<br />

his father’s, and his father remarried six times. When I asked Corporal Kim if he had any girlfriends, he<br />

answered that he had several before entering military service, but now he had none. <strong>The</strong> longest he had<br />

been in a relationship was six months. What I found out from many soldiers with adjustment problems<br />

was that they had an unhappy childhood and no girlfriends. Corporal Kim’s time in school was rocky.<br />

He could not pay for school fees oftentimes and missed classes often. He only had three or four school<br />

friends who grew distant from him when he complained that they did not come often enough.<br />

Corporal Kim filled out the worksheet as following:<br />

• Physical environment: weak physique<br />

• Psychological environment: about to attempt suicide<br />

605<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

• Social environment: treated as an outsider<br />

• Purpose: none<br />

My primary goal in counseling was to guide Corporal Kim to find a purpose, at least, in his military<br />

life. Corporal Kim said that he had never thought about what he wanted to become. He thought that<br />

having a dream in his life was a luxury he could not afford. Corporal Kim’s philosophical disease<br />

seemed to be due to ontological cause because he suffered from a loss in purpose of life or did not<br />

consider one. Viktor Frankl called this type of the disease of mind “existential vacuum,” 16 where its<br />

primary symptoms are ennui, disinterest, moral and mental confusion. Through two sessions Corporal<br />

Kim said that his current purpose was to safely complete his military service without causing any<br />

trouble.<br />

<strong>The</strong> therapy method that I used was to help Corporal Kim achieve his purpose in a way he enjoyed.<br />

Corporal Kim said that he had never voluntarily read any poem or novel by himself other than fantasy<br />

novels. I proposed that he tell a story pretending that he had been stranded in an uninhabited island by<br />

himself when his ship sank. At first, Corporal Kim was hesitant in speaking, but with time he started to<br />

use his imagination more freely. He would sometimes draw pictures on paper or write brief writings.<br />

Starting from the fourth session, he searched and printed out a picture of two men adrift on the island<br />

and said that one of them was himself. He said that the other man was his father, and as the story<br />

unfolded, he thought of situations where he could punish his father, such as making him starve.<br />

When he became tired of telling stories about the island, I told him the summary of Robinson Crusoe,<br />

read him a few excerpts and asked him what he would have done in that situation, and whether he<br />

agreed with Robinson Crusoe’s actions. When I asked him “What would it be like to live in an island<br />

alone?” he answered that “At first, it would be inconvenient but I would get used to it.” Corporal Kim<br />

did not feel the need for anyone else. I asked him to write down what he did after work in order to find<br />

out about his life in the barracks. Because he was a senior soldier he did not have to clean the barracks<br />

or do other miscellaneous work. He said that when everyone in the barracks watched TV, he alone read<br />

fantasy novels. When I asked him why he did not watch TV like the other soldiers, he said “It’s no<br />

fun.”<br />

I needed to encourage Corporal Kim to form relationships with other people. We watched the film<br />

Yes Man starring Jim Carrey and talked about the movie. In the beginning of the film the protagonist<br />

16 V. Frankl (1969), pp. 44-45.<br />

606


continues to say “no” to everything and lives a timid life, cut off from friends. <strong>The</strong>n, his life changes<br />

after participating in the “Yes” seminar that states that positive thinking brings good luck. We talked<br />

about which life was more ideal. Corporal Kim acknowledged that the latter was more. We agreed<br />

at this point to devise a strategy to improve his social environment. I talked with the instructor and<br />

officers at camp to form an encouraging atmosphere. <strong>The</strong> first strategy was to “make one friend.” I<br />

asked Corporal Kim to think of one person he could befriend among any of the higher or lower ranking<br />

officers, and he pointed out sergeant Park Ilsu. Sgt. Park had sometimes spared some kind words to<br />

him. We talked about how Corporal Kim could approach Sgt. Park. Two weeks later he tried talking<br />

to Sgt. Park and they watched TV together at the barracks. I encouraged Corporal Kim to continue to<br />

try holding conversation with Sgt. Park. However, his efforts were crushed because Sgt. Park spoke ill<br />

of Corporal Kim in the bathroom to another person, not knowing he was there. <strong>The</strong>re were difficulties<br />

along the way, but before Corporal Kim completed his military duty, he improved up to the point of<br />

playing soccer with Sgt Park and others and snacking with comrades at the store.<br />

<strong>The</strong> second strategy we planned was to “write to family.” Corporal Kim had a father and older sister.<br />

At first, he reacted negatively to this strategy, writing to his father in particular, because he thought<br />

that it would mean succumbing to his father. He had sometimes called his older sister over the public<br />

phone to ask her to send necessities to the camp, but once she sent the wrong materials, and they had<br />

a big fight, and he had not contacted her afterwards. I asked Corporal Kim to start by writing to me so<br />

that he would get used to writing letters. I said that he could write about his thoughts on the counseling<br />

he was receiving and any requests he had to me. <strong>The</strong> letters he wrote were sent to me through a<br />

noncommissioned officer. <strong>The</strong> first couple of letters were awkwardly written, but he thanked me for<br />

listening to him and suggested that we watch more entertaining films like Yes Man. I wrote back to<br />

Corporal Kim and not long afterwards he started writing to his father and older sister. His father did not<br />

write back to him but sent a message that he had received the letters through his older sister who came<br />

to visit him.<br />

I continued to counsel Corporal Kim for three months after he left army, but it had to stop when he<br />

found employment at a logistics company in Busan. My counsel to Corporal Kim was not able to reach<br />

the fourth and last step, but using the typical humanities methods of imagining, story-telling, writing,<br />

and reflecting, Corporal Kim was able to reach his goal in the army and return to society safely.<br />

6. Conclusion<br />

I examined the identity of humanities therapy through its theory, method, and case report. <strong>Humanities</strong><br />

therapy heals the disease of mind, in particular philosophical disease, with the spirit and methodology<br />

607<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

of humanities. <strong>The</strong> concept of philosophical disease, its classification, and teleological model are<br />

philosophical, but they belong to the scope of humanities therapy because they use the spirit and<br />

methodology of humanities. <strong>The</strong> teleological model used here will be developed into an integrated<br />

model afterwards by adding phenomenological, literary, and artistic factors.<br />

References<br />

Achenbach, G. 1987. Philosophische Praxis, K ln: Jürgen Dinter.<br />

Anscombe, G. 1957. Intention. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.<br />

Cohen, E. 2009. <strong>The</strong> New Rational <strong>The</strong>rapy, New York: Rowman & Littlefield.<br />

Beck, J. S. 1995. Cognitive <strong>The</strong>rapy: Basics and Beyond. New York: Guilford Press.<br />

Choi Byung-Wook. 2011. “Social Practice and <strong>The</strong>rapy: Example of Father Vincent Lebbe”,<br />

<strong>Humanities</strong> Research of KNU 30, pp. 407-432. (In Korean)<br />

Choi Heebong. 2010. “<strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy through Philosophical Counseling”, Daedong Philosopy<br />

53, pp. 379-398. (In Korean)<br />

Chung, Lakkil. 2012. “<strong>The</strong> Problem of Suicide as Seen through Film: Centered on Iwai Shunji’s All<br />

About Lily Chou-Chou”, <strong>Humanities</strong> Research of KNU 33, pp. 503-523. (In Korean)<br />

Clark, A. and Chalmers, D. 1996. “<strong>The</strong> Extended Mind”, Analysis 58, pp. 7-19.<br />

Corsni, R. Wedding. D. (2008), Current Psychotherapies. 8th edition. New York: Thomson.<br />

Damasio , A. 2003. Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and <strong>The</strong> Feeling Brain. New York: Harcourt.<br />

Frankl, V. 1969. <strong>The</strong> Will to Meaning: Foundations and Applications of Logotherapy, New York: <strong>World</strong><br />

Publishing Co.<br />

Han, Byung-Chul. 2010. Mudigkeitsgesellschaft, Berlin: Matthes & Seitz. Translated in Korean by<br />

Tehwan Kim(2012).<br />

Hoggard, L. 2005. How to be Happy: Lessons from Making Slough Happy. london; BBC Books.<br />

Horwitz, A. 2002. Creating mental Illness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.<br />

<strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy Project of Kangwon National University. 2009a. <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy, Second<br />

edition, <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy Series 1, Kangwon National University Press. (In Korean)<br />

_______. 2009b. How to do <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy, <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy Series 3, Kangwon National<br />

University Press. (In Korean)<br />

_______. 2010. <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy and Philosophy, <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy Series 5, Kangwon National<br />

University Press. (In Korean)<br />

_______. 2011. <strong>The</strong>ory and Principle of <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy, <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy Series 7, Kangwon<br />

National University Press. (In Korean)<br />

Im, Cheolwoo et als. 2003. Happy <strong>Humanities</strong>, Imagine. (In Korean)<br />

Jung, Sungmi. 2010. “Korean Language Education and Writing <strong>The</strong>rapy for Marriage Immigrant<br />

608


Women”, Review of Language and Literature 45, pp. 193-212. (In Korean)<br />

Kim, Ik-Jin. 2009. “Alcoholism and <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy”, <strong>Humanities</strong> Research of KNU 21, 327-343.<br />

(In Korean)<br />

Kim, Jeonghyun. 2011. “Violence of Thought according to Nietzsche and Treatment of Depression and<br />

Pain”, <strong>Humanities</strong> 41, 33-65. (In Korean)<br />

Kim, Seonhee. 2009. “Nietzsche and Cultural Criticism: applying interpretation to philosophical<br />

counseling: focused on hermeneutic discussion around the 19C and Nietzsche”, Study on Nietzsche<br />

15, pp. 91-115. (In Korean)<br />

Kim, Suksu. 2009. “Study on the Developmental Relationship between Psychological Treatment and<br />

Philosophical Counseling”, Society and Philosophy 17, pp. 65-96. (In Korean)<br />

Kim, Youngjin. 2004. Diagnosis and Prescription on Philosophical Disease: Clinical Philosophy,<br />

Seoul: Philosophy & Reality. (In Korean)<br />

Korea Philosophical Counseling Society. 2012. Why Philosophical <strong>The</strong>rapy?, Hakisiseup. (In Korean)<br />

Lee, Jinnam. 2011. “Philosophical Counseling and Psychological Counseling”, Philosophical Review<br />

26, pp. 9-34. (In Korean)<br />

Lee, Min-Yong. 2012. “Anxiety Phobia Neurosis and Psychoanalytic Evidence of Storytelling”,<br />

Buechner and Modern Literature 38, 153-175. (In Korean)<br />

Lee, Yundo. 2010. “Confucianist Study <strong>The</strong>ory and Meditation - Yi Hwang’s Cultivation <strong>The</strong>rapy<br />

Model using Hwarinshimbang”, Review of Korean Philosophy 28, 363-386. (In Korean)<br />

McNally, R. J. 2011. What is mental Illness?. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.<br />

Marinoff, L. 1999. Plato Not Prozac: Applying Philosophy to Everyday Problems. New York: Quill.<br />

<strong>The</strong> President’s Council on Bioethics. 2003. Beyond <strong>The</strong>rapy. New York: HarperCollins.<br />

Raabe, P. 2001. Philosophical Counseling: <strong>The</strong>ory and Practice. Westport, CT: Praeger.<br />

Rhee, Young E. 2008. “Embodied Mind and Disease of Mind”, Philosophical Inquiry 23(1), 5-37. (In<br />

Korean).<br />

_______. 2010a. “A More Philosophical Model of Counseling”, Universitas A Monthly Review of<br />

Philosophy and Culture, vol 37 no. 1, 35-48.<br />

_______. 2010b. “Embodied Mind <strong>The</strong>ory as a Foundation of Philosophical Counseling”, Journal of<br />

<strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy 1, 173-192.<br />

_______. 2011a. “Philosophical Practice and <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy in Korea”, Philosophical Practice<br />

6.1, 734-743.<br />

_______. 2011b. “Identity of <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy”, <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy 1, 5-32.<br />

_______. 2012. “A Teleological Approach to Philosophical Practice”, Proceedings of the XI-ICPP &<br />

HT2012, vol 2, 57-65.<br />

Um, Chanho. 2012. “Clearing the Past History and Treatment of History”, <strong>Humanities</strong> Research of<br />

KNU 33, pp. 263-290. (In Korean)<br />

609<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Varela, F., Thompson, E., and Rosch, E. 1991. <strong>The</strong> Embodied Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.<br />

von Wright, G. H. 197. Explanation and Understanding, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.<br />

Yoon, Il-Soo. 2012. “Introduction of Psychodrama and <strong>The</strong>rapy Effect”, Drama Research 37, pp. 85-<br />

116. (In Korean)<br />

Yu, Kang-Ha. 2010. “<strong>Humanities</strong>, Creating a Human Life: <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy Approach of Writing<br />

Future Autobiography”, Chinese Language and Literature 65, pp. 601-623. (In Korean)<br />

Yu, Keon-Sang. 2012. “Case Study of <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>The</strong>rapy used to Promote the Happiness of Middle-<br />

aged Women”, <strong>Humanities</strong> Research of KNU 33, pp. 477-501. (In Korean)<br />

610


<strong>The</strong> Division Trauma of Koreans and Orality Healing<br />

Jong Kun Kim<br />

Konkuk University<br />

1. What is Reunification <strong>Humanities</strong>?<br />

Academic discussions on reunification in the reality of the still-divided Korea usually take place in the<br />

social science field. It is true that humanities studies on reunification lack system and have only been<br />

sporadically conducted in the fields of literature or history. <strong>The</strong>re are a few reasons humanities has been<br />

unable to think in earnest the issues of division and reunification. First, there is the tendency to view<br />

reunification as a physical process. That is, people tend to view reunification as the political and economic<br />

transition from the present system or structure where one ethnic race has been divided into two states into<br />

a single, ethnical state. Second, there is a division habitus 1 working behind the familiarity of reunification.<br />

While the overcoming of division and reunification is a familiar and widely-accepted concept, the<br />

accumulation of the division habitus deriving from state violence and self-censorship based on the mutual<br />

hostility between the South and the North and the competition between the two states has inhibited focus<br />

on the problem, induced oblivion and obstructed academic research. <strong>The</strong> third reason is a simplistic and<br />

romanticized understanding of reunification. Discussions on reunification in humanities have so far been a<br />

return to the myth of recovering homogeneity based on the sentiment of ethnical homegeneity or based on<br />

the ideal of building a homogeneous nation. 2<br />

Because of such reasons, academic discussions on reunification has until now been usually considered<br />

1 Division habitus is the system of tendencies and beliefs when the ruling dynamics of a ‘division order’ or ‘division structure’<br />

consisting of the relations among bodies, objects and places created by the history of division are enchased in ‘bodies.’: Park<br />

Yeong-gyun, “A Philosophical Reflection on the Habitus of Division”, <strong>The</strong> Epoch and Philosophy, Korea Society of Philosophy,<br />

2010, pp. 378-379.<br />

2 Kim Seung-min, “Division, Reunification and Korea’s <strong>Humanities</strong>”, A <strong>Humanities</strong> Paradigm of Reunification, Seonin<br />

Publishing, 2011, p. 17.<br />

611<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

exclusive property of the field of social science, and humanities has been unable to present a systematic<br />

and long-term vision on the issue of Korea’s reunification. Reunification humanities is an answer to the<br />

demands of the times and the academics, and it is an approach to the issue of Korea’s reunification using<br />

humanities research methods aiming to overcome division and reach reunification through a humanities<br />

mindset. As such, we have set “Reunification <strong>Humanities</strong> of Communication, Healing and Integration” as<br />

our agenda.<br />

<strong>The</strong> viewing of reunification as the building of a homogeneous state or the restoration of an ethnic race’s<br />

homogeneity has led to extreme violence between the South and the North. <strong>The</strong> South-North reunification<br />

issue turns to violence when the desire for homogeneity leads to the unacceptance of the other side’s<br />

differences. <strong>The</strong>refore, humanities that ponders on how to overcome division and achieve reunification<br />

should first attempt to comprehend ‘the others.’<br />

Communication in reunification humanities is based on the premise of ‘the otherness of others’ and points<br />

to a ‘teaching and learning relationship.’ Communication that acknowledges such otherness aims not for<br />

a ‘return to primordial home’ in the past but for the ‘building of a new reunification community’ in the<br />

future.<br />

<strong>The</strong> division of North and South has seen a history of the libido of a people desiring to achieve the dream<br />

of building a homogeneous state dashed in the process of modernization in the context of Japan’s colonial<br />

rule and leading to a clash between the left and the right which accumulated in a tragic civil war. Because<br />

Koreans have gone through a division trauma, we need to identify the hurt and go through a process of<br />

healing. Another task that reunification humanities must pursue in its efforts to overcome division and<br />

achieve reunification is to find the direction of healing the division trauma.<br />

Reunification is not merely a merging of two systems or a political and economic merger. It is a<br />

sociocultural integration and the merging of the ‘bodies’ of South and North, a merger of social bodies. It<br />

is a process of leaving the divided social body and building a new social body in a reunified society. From<br />

this perspective, transforming the division habitus into a habitus of solidarity and fraternity means not<br />

only tearing down the walls of division but ultimately transforming the two different societies of the South<br />

and the North and creating a united ethnic community as a future society. This can be achieved through<br />

communication, solidarity and overcoming differences with the power of creation.<br />

Reunification humanities aims to achieve the challenges of communication, healing and integration<br />

through a creative reinterpretation of values and ideologies based on ‘commonness and differences,’ a<br />

healing process of the division trauma and the transformation of the division habitus into a shared life<br />

612


culture based on ethnicity. Not only does it aim for such systemic integration, reunification humanities<br />

hopes to create a sociocultural commonality that could act as an actual foundation for reunification, a life<br />

as a ethnic community and a social body of a reunified society. 3<br />

Reunification humanities presents such a future-oriented vision of reunification and sees not only the<br />

South Koreans as the main agents of reunification but includes the 8 million ‘Korean diaspora,’ equivalent<br />

to 10 percent of the domestic population. <strong>Humanities</strong> research enabling communication, healing and<br />

integration among Koreans all over the world is the essence of reunification humanities.<br />

As found in the concept of reunification humanities explained above, this paper also focuses on ‘the<br />

humanities of healing’ and aims to discuss the concept of division trauma, which forms a critical point of<br />

concern in the issue of reunification and explores ways of healing the trauma. In order to further grasp the<br />

realities of division trauma, this research conducted interviews with members of a group that retain trauma<br />

and tried to present aspects of actual trauma while also pondering the effects of healing discovered in the<br />

process of interviews.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> Concept and Aspects of Division Trauma<br />

In this paper, division trauma refers to the negative effects that Korea’s division, the Korean War, the<br />

killing and violence that took place in the duration of the division structure and the control of the state had<br />

on individuals.<br />

Division trauma is a linking of trauma, the psychological term generally used for ‘post-traumatic stress<br />

disorder (PTSD),’ to the historical event of division. This is done because when using terms such as<br />

‘division wounds’ or ‘division scars’ to describe the negative effects caused by division, the magnitude<br />

of the issue is attenuated. It is hoped that by applying the term ‘trauma,’ people would understand that<br />

wounds from the division are real and that they should be healed.<br />

When viewing the formation of communication and integration among people as the essence of<br />

reunification humanities, the first issue that needs to be solved is the healing of the emotional wounds of<br />

the Korean people caused by the division. Unless the division trauma is healed first, there can be no true<br />

integration or reunification.<br />

3 Kim Seung-min, “Division, Reunification and Korea’s <strong>Humanities</strong>”, “A <strong>Humanities</strong> Paradigm of Reunification”, Seonin<br />

Publishing, 2011, pp. 27-32.<br />

613<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

<strong>The</strong> concept of division trauma can be discussed by categorizing its collective and individual natures.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is the collective trauma of having our desire for a national state being thwarted in the history of<br />

Japanese colonial rule and division. <strong>The</strong>re is also the trauma from the Korean war when conflict rose to<br />

a climax. Also the mutual hostility and sense of fear in society generated in both South and North Korea<br />

as the political powers tried to use the conflict to their advantage led to a division trauma of a collective<br />

nature for our people. 4<br />

On the other hand, there are individuals who live with post-traumatic disorders. <strong>The</strong>re are those who<br />

personally experience the trauma of war and fear such as war veterans, people who witnesses massacres,<br />

those who came South during wartime, those who went to the North or were kidnapped and taken to<br />

the North against their will, their family members and those who defected from the North after the war.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se are division traumas of an individual nature. When these division traumas on an individual level are<br />

categorized into types, one can discover aspects of a collective trauma in them.<br />

<strong>The</strong> division trauma has continued with the systematization of state violence and the narration of division<br />

that has penetrated the people’s minds and their relationships with one another. <strong>The</strong> division system and<br />

narration of division ironically had the trait of using the division trauma and reproducing it. <strong>The</strong> division<br />

trauma exists to the background of the division system and division narration influencing our daily lives<br />

extensively. 5<br />

<strong>The</strong> incidents of conflict between the South and the North while the division system continued on after<br />

liberation from Japan and the Korean war are almost too numerous to list. Incidents, big and small,<br />

that could be seen as historical and having widely influence society have taken place, from the Jeju 4.3<br />

Incident and the Yeosun Incident from before the Korean War to present day. Although detailed statistics<br />

on such incidents were not included in this paper, the following chart briefly outlines some of the most<br />

important incidents.<br />

4 Kim Seong-min Park Yeong-gyun, “A Contemporary Reflection on the Trauma of Division”, <strong>The</strong> Epoch and Philosophy 21-1,<br />

Korea Society of Philosophy, 2010, pp. 173-174.<br />

5 Lee Byeong-soo, “<strong>The</strong> Characteristics and Ethics of the Division Trauma”, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> Paradigm of Reunification, Seonin,<br />

2011, p. 195.<br />

614


Period Incident Region of Occurrence<br />

April 3, 1948<br />

-Sept 21, 1954<br />

Oct, 11, 1948<br />

June 25, 1950<br />

Oct 25, 1950<br />

Dec 14, 1950<br />

Jeju 4.3 Incident<br />

Yeosun<br />

Incident<br />

Breakout of<br />

Korean War<br />

Chinese<br />

Communist Army<br />

join the war<br />

Pulling out of<br />

Heungnam<br />

July 27, 1953 Truce Agreement<br />

Truce Presentday<br />

After 1999<br />

Kidnapping of<br />

South Korean<br />

fishermen<br />

Surge of North<br />

Korean defectors<br />

Throughout<br />

Jeju Island<br />

Honam southern<br />

seacoast and<br />

vicinities of<br />

Mount. Jiri and<br />

Mount. Baekun<br />

Throughout the<br />

Korean Peninsula<br />

Ethnic Koreans in<br />

China<br />

North Korea<br />

Throughout the<br />

Korean Peninsula<br />

Coastal areas<br />

615<br />

Aspect and scale of division trauma 6<br />

- First recorded massacre on a national level<br />

- At least 25,000 to 80,000 victims<br />

- 300,000 Jeju residents affected<br />

- Civilian massacre by rebels<br />

- Damages caused in battles with rebels<br />

- Plundering during the suppression of rebels<br />

- 1 million killed in South Korea<br />

- 1.13 million killed in North Korea<br />

- Civilian massacre by US army 7<br />

- Civilian massacre by South Korean army<br />

- Civilian massacres by People’s Court<br />

- 6.5 million war refugees (as of March, 1951)<br />

- 55,000 to 60,000 deployed prior to the Korean War 8<br />

- 20,000 participated in the war against the United States 9<br />

- 10 million family members separated<br />

- 450,000 war veterans<br />

- 200,000 war widows<br />

- 100,000 war orphans<br />

- Among 3,796 abducted South Koreans, 3,316 were<br />

able to return home<br />

- 427 kidnapped fishermen (as of Nov 2008) 10<br />

- Over 23,000 North Korean defectors<br />

<strong>The</strong> tragic trauma experience during the Korean War did not end with the war. Both South and North<br />

Korea punished people for guilt-by-association and caused trauma to the surviving family members.<br />

Even when restricting the range of guilt-by-association to immediate family members, such punishments<br />

increased the number of those affected by trauma four- to five-fold.<br />

6 Statistics on scope of casualties and damages were taken from online encyclopedias.<br />

7 Information on civilian massacre by US army were taken from http://www.koreanmassacres.com<br />

8 Kim Jung-saeng, <strong>The</strong> Secret Entry of Joseon’s Voluntary Army and the Korean War, Myeongji Publishing, 2000, requoted<br />

from p. 159.<br />

9 <strong>The</strong> Compilation Committee for Footsteps of Ethnic Koreans in China, Foundation, Beijing: Minjok Publishing Company,<br />

1994, requoted from p. 77.<br />

10 Eum Gyeong-seon·Jang Jae-hwan, <strong>The</strong> Truth about the Kidnapped Fishermen of East Sea Coast, Sorak News, 2008,<br />

p. 56.<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Another point to consider is the torture that South Koreans abducted by the North (mostly fishermen)<br />

after the truce had to endure. As shown in the chart, almost 90 percent of the abductees were able to return<br />

home and it may seem their trauma was limited. However, because they had spent some time in the North,<br />

albeit against their will, they were stigmatized by the South Korean government. <strong>The</strong>y were kept under<br />

surveillance and their freedom was restricted even after returning home. Even their family members had<br />

to suffer because of guilt-by-association.<br />

Whether the incident was big or small, the point of focus is that there are always people who are<br />

traumatized at the scene of incidents. Although not shown in the chart above, there were numerous local<br />

incidents involving war casualties, victims caught between pro- and anti-communist campaigns. Indeed,<br />

the division trauma that’s happened since the division can be seen as being nationwide.<br />

South Koreans have a tendency to talk about the damages done to South Koreans when we talk about the<br />

trauma of division. However, the Korean War was fought by both the South and the North, and the trauma<br />

that the North Koreans endured must also be considered. One must not forget that the guilt-by-association<br />

that family members of those who went North suffered in South Korea was probably similarly, if not more<br />

adversely, experienced by family members of those who went South in North Korea.<br />

In addition, the division trauma is often found in overseas Koreans as well. Many ethnic Koreans living<br />

in China had to join the North Korean army once the Korean War started and others were forced to fight<br />

in the Chinese Communist army once China decided to join the war to counter the US presence in the<br />

Korean Peninsula. <strong>The</strong>ir trauma could also be seen as division trauma and included when considering<br />

the issue. Seen from this perspective, the geographical scope of the division trauma deriving from the<br />

division of the Korean Peninsula far exceeds the boundaries of our territories, signifying that this is a<br />

comprehensive issue indeed.<br />

According to recent statistics, the accumulated number of North Korean defectors was only about 1,000<br />

until 1999. This rose to 23,000 by March, 2012. Most of the later cases were those who crossed over to<br />

China to find food as the economic situation in the North got worse. Many of them had to live some 3<br />

to 4 years or even 7 to 8 years wandering around China before being able to come to the South. <strong>The</strong>y go<br />

through much suffering during this period in China. Those who are fortunate enough to come to the South,<br />

again go through the painful process of assimilating into South Korean society. <strong>The</strong>ir trauma could also be<br />

seen as trauma caused by division. <strong>The</strong>refore, division trauma is a nation-wide, race-wide and on-going<br />

issue.<br />

616


3. Methods of Orality Healing<br />

<strong>The</strong> diagnosis and treatment of trauma takes place through psychiatric counseling programs. Parallels for<br />

the diagnosis and healing of the division trauma could be found here. As such, life interviews are widely<br />

used and evaluated to be the most appropriate as the method of approach to division trauma. 11<br />

Counseling programs to treat trauma in psychiatry takes place over several sessions so that the progress<br />

of treatment can be observed. Similarly, in order to diagnose and heal the trauma that the interviewee has,<br />

the life interviews should be conducted over several sessions. <strong>The</strong> interviews should be conducted in such<br />

direction that the interviewee can talk about his or her life experiences. While inducing the interviewee to<br />

talk naturally about his or her life, interviewers will be able to detect the symptoms of trauma in the words<br />

and by analyzing this, verify the effects of the diagnosis and healing.<br />

Healing through interviews is similar to already existing storytelling or writing therapy but there is a<br />

difference. While orality healing and storytelling therapy are similar in that they both use speech as<br />

the medium, storytelling therapy usually takes the form of counseling and short interviews asking for<br />

fragments of memories. This is different from the narrative of life story that is found in life interviews.<br />

Also, while writing therapy might have the advantage of the final result being a well-structured narrative,<br />

there is the considerable difference that it uses writing, not speech. In oral interviews, interviewees have<br />

to reconstruct memories and tell their story on the spot. Writing assignments, on the other hand, give<br />

writers the opportunity to review their writing and express their memories in refined language. Also<br />

oral interviews are possible even with subjects who remain at the elementary level of oral culture are<br />

uncapable of expressing themselves in writing. 12<br />

<strong>The</strong>oretically, trauma treatment and recovery should be conducted in three stages: the stage of establishing<br />

a sense of safety for the victims, the stage of remembering and expressing condolence for the situation in<br />

which the trauma occurred and the stage of connecting all this back to reality. According to this theory,<br />

oral life interviews pertain to the second stage. Remembering the situation in which the trauma occurred<br />

and expressing one’s feelings about it is a form of story recounting and this is what oral life interview is<br />

about.<br />

11 Kim Jong-gun, “<strong>The</strong> True Nature of Trauma as Seen through Orality”, <strong>The</strong> Journal of the <strong>Humanities</strong> for Unification 51 st Issue,<br />

Konkuk University <strong>Humanities</strong> Research Institute, 2011, pp. 39-41.<br />

12 <strong>The</strong> ‘elementary level of oral culture’ is an important concept in Walt J. Ong’s Orality and Literacy. It is a cultural level of<br />

perceiving the world through narrative and speaking based on memories when one is unable to read or write.<br />

617<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

This is the process of persuading victims with trauma to reach deep within and draw out complete and<br />

detailed accounts of the trauma. Such reconstruction process transforms the memory of the trauma and<br />

integrates it into the life story. General memories are easily formed and easy to talk about. However,<br />

memories of trauma are not expressed in language and are static. First accounts of trauma are usually dull,<br />

stereotypical and unemotional. Untransformed trauma accounts are said to be in the pre-narrative stage.<br />

<strong>The</strong> story doesn’t progress with time and the speaker doesn’t express any emotions or opinions. Memories<br />

of trauma are often compared to still pictures or silent movies. Trauma treatment is like trying to add<br />

music and language to this. 13<br />

Human memories are formed as explicit memories once a person acquires language skills. Memories of<br />

trauma are cases when excessive shock leads to the memory remaining in the level of implicit memory. 14<br />

Treating such memories of trauma consists of transforming an implicit memory, in which physical senses,<br />

emotions, images are separated, into an explicit memory. It could be called the process of integrating<br />

pieces of emotional and sensory memories into a new coherent memory. 15<br />

At this point, we can once again verify that life interviews are an appropriate method for oral therapy.<br />

A short interview might provide some insight into the present state of the subject, but it has limits to<br />

understanding the subject’s innermost pain.<br />

A historial recounting of past experiences in chronological order is insufficient for healing trauma. Life<br />

interviews, because they have the traits of being fiction in that the interviewee reconstructs his or her own<br />

identity in present tense by expressing his or her experiences, might sound like rambling or grumbling, but<br />

because they include emotional memories, they are appropriate for diagnosing and healing trauma.<br />

13 Herman, Judith Lewis (translated by Choi Hyeon-jeong). Trauma and recovery: <strong>The</strong> aftermath of violence from domestic abuse<br />

to political terror, Planet, 2007, p. 292.<br />

14 <strong>The</strong>re are two memory systems in the human brain. One is the implicit memory and the other, explicit memory. Implicit<br />

memories are of a subconscious level and activated immediately after birth. Having to do with the gray matters of the cerebral<br />

cortex, these include non-language memories such as emotional, sensory and behavioral memories. Explicit memories are<br />

formed at around the age of three when a child acquires language. Having to do with hippocampus, these include language<br />

memories such as narrative memories, autobiographical memories, memories of experience, and memories of vocabulary.<br />

Experience a trauma can induce a great shock that paralyzes the brain’s information system and oppress the function of the<br />

hippocampus which controls the storing of day-to-day memories. Instead, the gray matters are activated and made to store the<br />

negative memories and emotions. That is why memories of trauma are usually stored in form of implicit memories in the gray<br />

matters of the right-side brain. <strong>The</strong> memory of the trauma is scattered into pieces of strong sensory, imagery and emotional<br />

memories and stored without becoming an integrated and coherent memory. That is why it is difficult for victims of trauma<br />

to talk about their memories of trauma, making it difficult for them to unburden the suffering they feel (Kim Jun-ki, <strong>The</strong><br />

Psychology of Healing as Seen in Movies, Sigma Books, 2009, pp. 82-83).<br />

15 Kim Jun-ki, <strong>The</strong> Psychology of Healing as Seen in Movies, Sigma Books, 2009, p. 83.<br />

618


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

integrate it, not to exorcise it. <strong>The</strong> basic premise of psychological therapy is that truth holds the power to<br />

restore and recover once its spoken outloud. 17<br />

Ultimately, through the reconstruction of the story, the trauma becomes a ‘new story’ and no longer a<br />

source of ‘shame and insult’ but rather, a medal of ‘dignity and value.’ Reconstructing the event helps the<br />

victim ‘recover a lost world,’ 18 in the words of one actual interviewee. As such, it can be said that a life<br />

story containing the memories of trauma and the process of telling the story has healing effects.<br />

Some of the specific methods in reconstructing stories that various case studies have shown to be effective<br />

in healing trauma are direct exposure, flooding and testimonies. <strong>The</strong> flooding method is a conversion<br />

method such as role-playing. <strong>The</strong> testimonial method involves recording the interviewee’s account and<br />

going over the recording to connect the fragments into a cohesive testimony. <strong>The</strong> subject is then asked to<br />

read the testimony aloud, which has the effect of alleviating the aftereffects of fear.<br />

This author also witnessed similar cases in the process of publishing contents of interviews. After<br />

recording four sessions of life interviews with a female North Korean defector, I met with her and<br />

asked her to read the transcript of the recorded interviews and tell me if there were any corrections to be<br />

made. While reviewing her interviews, the interviewee showed signs of great pride that she was able to<br />

accomplish this task. She seemed impressed with herself that she was able to give such a detailed account<br />

of the trauma that she herself had until now been afraid to talk of.<br />

<strong>The</strong> testimonial method of trauma healing shows how the act of telling one’s story, or orality, can alleviate<br />

major post-traumatic disorder symptoms in the stage of trauma recovery. In conclusion, life interviews in<br />

which victims are asked to recount in detail their past experience and the shock and hurt that they felt, are<br />

in themselves a process of trauma healing.<br />

4. Diagnosis and Possible Healing of Division Trauma through Orality<br />

As seen above, the division trauma that has taken place inside us can be expressed through various<br />

symptoms. Interviews that diagnose the individual division trauma symptoms and find ways to heal<br />

them can lead to direct and tangible healing effects but such work takes much time and effort. <strong>The</strong>refore,<br />

the task of typing and categorizing the aspects of division trauma found in sample interviews in order<br />

17 Herman, Judith Lewis (translated by Choi Hyeon-jeong). Trauma and recovery: <strong>The</strong> aftermath of violence from domestic abuse<br />

to political terror, Planet, 2007, pp. 301-302.<br />

18 Herman, 2007, p. 302.<br />

620


to explore ways of healing is necessary. In this paper, we would like to present the most relevant and<br />

authentic cases of North Korean defectors as found among various division trauma types.<br />

This author has previously published a book based on records of life interviews conducted with North<br />

Korean defectors. 19 <strong>The</strong> interviews were not single events but conducted throughout four to five weekly<br />

sessions. 20 In a first-time interview, the interviewee was asked to share any oral literature that she had<br />

encountered while living in North Korea and her overall life experience in the North. However, within the<br />

first 30 minutes, the interviewee professed that she couldn’t think of anything more to say about North<br />

Korean folklore or culture. <strong>The</strong> interviewers then cautiously asked her about her experience of defecting<br />

from the North. After a pause when she seemed to be organizing her thoughts, and the interviewee started<br />

talking. Once she started, she talked extensively about her defection and the life she left behind in North<br />

Korea. She said she had started going to church since coming to the South and that she found much solace<br />

in religion. It seems that she has had experience giving testimonies in church about the tragic situation<br />

in North Korea and her defection. In the testimonies, she talked about memories she had about certain<br />

traumatic experiences she had gone through. However, the memories she shared were only sporadic and<br />

they seemed not have reached a heart-felt level of story-telling. Because life interviews ask the person to<br />

narrate his or her entire life, the person reconstructs the memories of trauma as he or she talks about major<br />

life elements such as families and marriage.<br />

<strong>The</strong> interviewee first tried to defect in 1997 when North Korea was going through a food shortage,<br />

often referred to as the March of Suffering. She was caught and sent to a concentration camp for six<br />

months. Her husband died during imprisonment and on her second attempt to defect in January 1999, she<br />

succeeded. She went into hiding in China for eight years. In 2007, she came to South Korea and was able<br />

to find work as a live-in housekeeper for a female professor at a theological seminary.<br />

<strong>The</strong> information obtained during the interviews were shocking and the interviewee herself had much<br />

to say, so the interview was conducted over five sessions. <strong>The</strong> interviewers were able to see the trauma<br />

that the interviewee harbored as she talked about her life. This author has used the term ‘North Korea<br />

defection trauma’ when categorizing the traits of trauma found in North Korean defectors. <strong>The</strong> traits of<br />

19 Kim Jong-gun Jung Jin-ah, March of Suffering, Stories of North Korean Defectors, Pakeejeong Publishing, 2012.<br />

20 <strong>The</strong> interviews were conducted as following.<br />

Dates and number of sessions : 6 weekly sessions beginning from April 9, 2010.<br />

Venue: Konkuk University <strong>Humanities</strong> Building Room 611<br />

Interviewee: Han Yeong-suk (pseudonym, 60 years old at the time of interview)<br />

Interviewers: Kim Jong-gun, Kim Ye-sun<br />

Main Topics: Life in North Korea including the experience of defecting, lifestyle in North Korea, adapting to South Korea<br />

621<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

trauma found among North Korean defectors as a group can be largely categorized into separation trauma,<br />

state violence trauma that they endured while in the North and in China and social violence trauma that<br />

they experienced after coming to the South. However, the diagnosis of each individual’s trauma should<br />

be conducted in detail and as the diagnosis can be found in the interviews themselves, they will not be<br />

referred to as particular types in this paper.<br />

This paper aims to present examples that could count as major symptoms of post-traumatic stress<br />

disorders such as the repeated mentioning of a subject or exaggerated expressions of emotions as found<br />

in the interviews. By diagnosing these symptoms as trauma, this research hopes to find the possibility of<br />

healing them.<br />

< Case Study 1> <strong>The</strong> painful memory of getting separated from a son because of hunger<br />

[Interviewer: What was the hardest thing you had to go through when you were in the North?]<br />

<strong>The</strong> most painful days of my life were.. In the 1970s and 80s, they gave out rations, what little<br />

they gave, once every 15 days. Only workers could get rations. Farmers got their entire year’s food<br />

supply once a year in the fall. Workers included university professors, school masters, you name<br />

it. You got your rations twice a month and that was it. So when I was keeping house in the 70s<br />

and 80s, we at least got rations. But we had to live 15 days on the rations. But sometimes they’d<br />

only give enough for 13 days and you were still expected to live 15 days on it. <strong>The</strong>y’d do that<br />

sometimes when the state was running short on food supplies.<br />

So we didn’t have things like snacks in North Korea. My child never saw snacks being sold in<br />

stores when growing up. He was born in 1971 and he lived without ever having seen a snack. If he<br />

never saw a snack, it means it was worse for children born after him. Things got much worse.<br />

So, in North Korea, eating rice for us North Koreans was unimaginable, something that only<br />

happened once in a blue moon. That’s how rare rice was. So, we got corn for our rations. That’s<br />

what we lived on all our lives, rations of corn. So, at least we got that in the 70s and 80s.<br />

But starting from 1993, I was unable to get any rations. Since ’93, no, since ’91 and ’92, you only<br />

got rations if the ration distribution center got any food from the state. If the distribution center got<br />

food that day, you got rations. If it didn’t get any, you didn’t get any. That’s how we lived. And<br />

then in ’94 Kim Il Sung died and we didn’t get any rations whatsoever in ’95 and ’96. No food<br />

whatsoever. So, in North Korea, we don’t have anything like private property. You don’t have your<br />

622


own house, your own savings. <strong>The</strong>re is no you. So if the state doesn’t give, the entire country has<br />

to starve. And still the state didn’t give any rations out, and that time, ’96 and ’97, were the hardest<br />

for me.<br />

And I’m saying this... if only my son was still here... I wouldn’t be saying this and bringing up<br />

my son... there is a reason I’m saying this. <strong>The</strong> reason this was the most painful to me was that in<br />

January 1997, my son left home to defect. He left in January 1997, and 1997 was the worst year<br />

ever in North Korea. In the summer of 1996, there wasn’t a single healthy person walking in the<br />

streets of North Korea. Everyone was starving. 21<br />

In order to make the interviewee’s story more comprehendible, the interviewers divided the story into<br />

chapters according to the subject and titled the chapters. Stories about hunger, food shortage, economic<br />

hardships accounted for 30 percent among 84 chapters. <strong>The</strong> excerpt included above is about how her<br />

eldest son had to cross over to China to escape the hunger. This is the story that she started with when<br />

asked about the hardest thing that she had to go through while living in North Korea. <strong>The</strong> late 1990s was<br />

called the age of the March of Suffering, when the earliest of defectors made their way over to China<br />

to escape starving to death. <strong>The</strong> interviewee herself defected to escape hunger. <strong>The</strong> hunger that the<br />

defectors felt at that time didn’t stop at the level of simple hunger. It was so severe that it was inevitably<br />

accompanied by fear of death by starvation. <strong>The</strong>refore, one can conclude that the fear of death by<br />

starvation has left a traumatic imprint on this interviewee. To the interviewee, hunger is inextricably linked<br />

with death. Her husband died in prison of starvation and a neighbor to whom she was close with and who<br />

attempted to defect with her, also died of hunger. That is why she expressed sympathy towards a woman<br />

she recounts having met in prison, who was imprisoned for having killed and eaten a human. “I would<br />

have done the same,” she admitted. Hunger made her experience separation from her son, and this led to<br />

the fear of hunger that she experienced herself.<br />

One of the major symptoms of trauma is repetitive re-experience, and the interviewee clearly showed this<br />

symptom in her interview. From stories of her own experience to accounts of what she saw or heard from<br />

others, the keywords ‘hunger’ and ‘death’ were constantly repeated. She expressed strong anger towards<br />

the North Korean government, commenting that it should perish for having made its people starve to<br />

death like this. She even said that she wished the United States would send bomber planes to bring the<br />

government to a quick end. This could be seen as a state of hyper-arousal.<br />

21 Kim Jong-gun Jung Jin-ah, March of Suffering, Stories of North Korean Defectors, Pakeejeong Publishing, 2012, pp. 48-49.<br />

623<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

<strong>The</strong> fear of dying of starvation was an ongoing fear for the interviewee. On the first day of the interview,<br />

at mealtime with the interviewers, the interviewee barely ate anything. She said she had gotten so used to<br />

starving in the North that even now, she couldn’t eat much. Even after eight years in China and two years<br />

in the South, she was holding on to a rigid perception that food was only necessary to alleviate hunger.<br />

This could be seen as another traumatic disorder.<br />

<strong>The</strong> interviewee’s trauma deriving from having experienced hunger became a major theme during the<br />

series of interviews conducted, manifesting through various subject matters. However, at the fourth<br />

interview, interviewers could sense that her hard-line tone had somewhat begun to soften. Although this<br />

softening came when she was talking about how difficult it is to adapt to South Korea’s overly competitive<br />

society, she repeatedly stated that she wouldn’t have left the North had she only been given a decent<br />

amount of corn and salt rations.<br />

“If they would only not arrest me for having run off to the South and if they would only give me food, I’d<br />

go back to North Korea.” <strong>The</strong>se words showed how her perspective of North Korea, the land of hunger,<br />

was changing. It was changing from being an object of fear to an object of longing. Her psychological<br />

state, repeatedly talking about the fear of hunger and expressing pent-up anger, became alleviated with<br />

the repeated interviews and she relaxed her rigid view of North Korea and now saw it has a livable place<br />

‘if it only had food.’ Such alleviation of fear and tension is the result of having repeatedly recounting the<br />

memories of fear that the interviewee experienced herself and the beginning of a healing process.<br />

< Case Study 2> Protesting the perceived prejudice that female North Korean defectors are promiscuous<br />

Our professor, the professor that we are working with here, told me something when I had just<br />

arrived here two years ago. One evening she said to me,<br />

“We need to educate North Korean defectors on relationships and teach them the virtue of chastity.<br />

So many North Korean women have husbands back home and still find men to live with when<br />

staying in China and then go on to find new husbands here in the South. This is shameful behavior<br />

for Korean women. So many North Korean women seem to be unaware of this.”<br />

That’s what she said. Now, our professor is a highly-respected person. But I immediately<br />

responded,<br />

“Professor, don’t say such things. Who are you trying to teach about chastity? You should try<br />

walking in their shoes. How dare you say such things without having gone through what they did?<br />

624


Chastity is a luxury in situations of life or death. How could you teach women who’d gone through<br />

such situations without having experienced it yourself? Would they listen to you? Would they hear<br />

your words? You would be insulting them.”<br />

That’s what I said. And our professor, she’s a good person, she said,<br />

“You’re right”<br />

and she listened to me. <strong>The</strong>n she said,<br />

“You’re right. You’re absolutely right. I shouldn’t have said that.”<br />

That’s how I stopped her from saying such things.<br />

So I said,<br />

“How dare you try to educate people on ethics without having gone through the things they have<br />

and lived in the environment they have? How dare you try to preach? It’s preposterous.” Am I not<br />

right? That’s what I told the professor. Don’t ever do that. That’s what I tell all South Koreans.<br />

“Don’t you try to preach without knowing what you’re saying.”<br />

Am I not right? Am I wrong? I am saying everything I want to say here. I’m saying this because<br />

you’re listening and understanding. I heard about someone who had to live in a household where<br />

there were several unmarried brothers and she had to sleep with all of them in turn. That’s how<br />

women are being sold in China. 22<br />

<strong>The</strong> interviewers could perceive throughout the interview the respect and gratitude that the interviewee<br />

felt towards this female theology professor who supported her after her arrival in South Korea. However,<br />

in the excerpt included above, the interviewee showed an outburst of emotions. <strong>The</strong> professor was a<br />

figure she respected and the person who gave her a job, but the interviewee could barely control her<br />

feelings when she showed fierce, almost-furious resentment towards her for taking issue with the concept<br />

of chastity among female Northern Korean defectors. She was strongly rejecting the professor because<br />

22 Kim Jong-gun Jung Jin-ah, March of Suffering, Stories of North Korean Defectors, Pakeejeong Publishing, 2012, pp. 206-207.<br />

625<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

she felt the professor was taking issue with the human trafficking and sexual assaults that female North<br />

Korean females become vulnerable to while staying in China. <strong>The</strong>re is no evidence to point that the<br />

interviewee or her daughter had been placed in such situations. However, in her interview, she mentioned<br />

how parents would tell their daughter, who driven by hunger attempted to cross the Dumangang river, to<br />

stay alive at whatever cost, even by selling herself. She went on to say how no parent would ever blame<br />

their daughter if she was forced to sell herself to survive. <strong>The</strong> interviewee recounted in tears a story she<br />

said she had first heard from a woman she met when hiding in China. A young couple escaped by crossing<br />

the Dumangang river, leaving their elderly parents and four-year-old son behind. <strong>The</strong>y pretended to be<br />

siblings, and when the wife was sold to a Chinese man, she had to sleep with her new ‘husband’ while<br />

her husband could only watch in silence. Although it wasn’t a trauma that she herself experienced, the<br />

interviewee identified herself with the victims of sexual assault or at least felt a strong bond to them when<br />

hearing their tragic stories.<br />

<strong>The</strong> most common trait of post-traumatic stress disorder experienced after being sexually assaulted is the<br />

repeated alternation between hyper-arousal (a state of increased tension marked by such psychological<br />

effects as anxiety, anger and fear and physical effects as quickened heartbeat and breathing) and hypo-<br />

arousal (a state of dulled reaction marked by a lack of emotions and slow heartbeat and breathing). 23<br />

When the interviewee, who was usually gentle-mannered, expressed explosive anger towards the female<br />

professor, whom she had talked about with great respect until now, it could be understood that she was<br />

experiencing a state of hyper-arousal. <strong>The</strong> interviewee continued in this state throughout the interview.<br />

She would mimic the angry tones in her story while glaring at the interviewers and she showed shortness<br />

of breath. <strong>The</strong> interviewee, while not having been sexually assaulted herself, had been directly impacted<br />

by the trauma that the collective group of her fellow female North Korean defectors had experienced and<br />

this had left imprints on her.<br />

<strong>The</strong> point at the end of the interview when the interviewee appealed to the interviewers to agree to what he<br />

or she said is a window into exploring the clues to healing trauma disorders. “Am I not right? Do you hear<br />

me? I am pouring out my heart here. I feel like I can say anything because you listen and understand.”<br />

Such an appeal could be interpreted as an expression of will by the interviewee that she wanted to unload<br />

all the pent-up anger inside now that she felt a certain bond with the interviewers. This is similar to the<br />

results of the healing effects of a testimony. <strong>The</strong> interviewee felt secure enough at this point that she<br />

could talk about all the painful memories she was harboring inside. This could be recognized as a point of<br />

healing in orality healing.<br />

23 Kim Jun-ki, <strong>The</strong> Psychology of Healing as Seen in Movies, Sigma Books, 2009. p. 143.<br />

626


Case Study 3> Discovering leisure after coming to South Korea<br />

It was last summer. I went to the outdoor market as usual, this place called Gildong Market. It’s<br />

a marketplace with shops lined on both sides. I went to the market to do some grocery shopping<br />

because every month, I hold a party for a group of fellow North Korean defectors at my place. So<br />

I was walking around the market shopping for groceries, and there were these two middle-aged<br />

women. <strong>The</strong>y seemed to be in their forties and they were walking towards my direction. As they<br />

were passing me by, one woman turns to the other and says,<br />

“Hey. Let’s go to my house and share a bowl of cold noodles.”<br />

That’s all she said.<br />

But when I heard those words, I suddenly felt numb. My head felt like it was swirling. And then, I<br />

couldn’t remember where I was or why I was holding this bag and which direction I was headed to.<br />

I felt completely numb. All in the middle of the market, the moment I heard those words. I thought<br />

to myself,<br />

‘What am I doing? People are going to stare at me. I should get going but I don’t know where I<br />

came from and where I should go.’<br />

I was so flustered. But when I told this to the professor, she didn’t seem to understand.<br />

“Why?” she asked.<br />

So I came [to the interview] and said,<br />

“I heard those words and it felt like my heart stopped beating all of a sudden.”<br />

And the professor asked,<br />

“Why?”<br />

You know- we were never able to say those words all our lives.<br />

“Hey, let’s go to my house and share a bowl of cold noodles.”<br />

627<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

How my heart froze at these words (sobbing). So I said to the professor today, I feel so wronged.<br />

I am a good-natured person, I have a lot of friends. But in North Korea, in this country the words,<br />

“come to my place and share a bowl of cold noodles,” don’t exist. <strong>The</strong>se words don’t exist there.<br />

So when the two women said those words and passed me by, I felt so emotional. You know,<br />

professor, the two women said those words and passed me by and those words hit me square in my<br />

heart and I couldn’t remember which way I was supposed to go at the moment. I stayed stuck in<br />

the same place for a long time, toing and froing.“<br />

That’s how it was. That’s how we lived. We did. If we ever got a bowl of noodle to cook, we had to<br />

feed our children first. I couldn’t possibly ask my friend while walking outside,<br />

“Come in and have a bowl of noodles before you go.” 24<br />

<strong>The</strong> interviewee would often refer to the hunger she had felt in North Korea and talk about times when<br />

she would suddenly feel dull while going about her day even after coming to South Korea. She talked<br />

about a time when she had gone to the market and felt her senses go dull when overhearing a conversation<br />

between two middle-aged women. It was a simple conversation in which one woman invited the other to<br />

her home to enjoy a meal of a bowl of cold noodles. <strong>The</strong>se words, however, had a flashback effect and<br />

made the interviewee recall her days of suffering back in North Korea. She talked about the time when<br />

she witnessed her neighbor die of starvation but wasn’t able to share her measly portion of corn stew.<br />

She also recalled how she had no money to go to the funeral of the elderly neighbor who had been her<br />

midwife when she gave birth. <strong>The</strong> conversation between the two women in which one offered to share her<br />

food with the other must have triggered flashback memories of the interviewee’s tragic past experiences.<br />

When she overheard the two women, she suddenly lost her sense of reality and couldn’t remember where<br />

she was, what she was doing there and where she was headed to.<br />

When considering that avoidance and numbness are two major symptoms of trauma disorders, one can<br />

diagnose this situation as the manifestation of such symptoms. Ultimately, the interviewee, upon returning<br />

home, appealed to the female professor who was conducting the conversation that she had no other choice<br />

but to do what she did while her trauma remained. Such aspect can also be understood as an aspect of<br />

trauma healing in orality healing. <strong>The</strong> act of recounting the injustice one is suffering at the time of the<br />

trauma and asking for sympathy is a good example of how an orality situation can be used for healing.<br />

24 Kim Jong-gun Jung Jin-ah, March of Suffering, Stories of North Korean Defectors, Pakeejeong Publishing, 2012, pp. 132-133.<br />

628


5. Remaining Problems<br />

<strong>The</strong> above-mentioned examples are classical displays of the major symptoms of trauma found in an<br />

interviewee’s oral account of his or her life experience. Such examples of trauma are manifested diversely,<br />

differing from individual to individual. However, these need to be categorized if they are to be generalized<br />

as the collective trauma of North Korean defectors instead of being seen as personal experiences of<br />

individuals. This author has previously attempted to categorize the accounts of the North Korean defectors<br />

into types.<br />

<strong>The</strong> trauma that North Korean defectors showed could be categorized into dispersion trauma, state<br />

violence trauma, social violence trauma, etc. Such categorization was overly broad and not adequate to<br />

be applied in specific cases of healing. Further detailed categorization was required. For example, the first<br />

case study dealing with fear of starvation could be typed as trauma of death by starvation. <strong>The</strong> second case<br />

study could be typed as trauma of human trafficking. Other commonly-found trauma types found among<br />

North Korean defectors were traumas originating from injuries sustained while being chased by the<br />

Chinese security police, from the fear experienced when crossing the Dumangang river and when crossing<br />

the Mekong River. It is this author’s opinion that such categorization would contribute to formulating<br />

methods of diagnosis and treatment of division trauma for orality healing.<br />

Literature, which focuses on narration, captures a different point from the study methods of orality that<br />

other social sciences such as sociology, anthropology and history emphasizes. <strong>The</strong>se disciplines focus<br />

on recreating the narrative through the recollections that the interviewee experiences himself or herself.<br />

However, in the actual practice of investigating orality, it was discovered that the interviewee talked<br />

about other people’s experiences in almost equal amounts as about her own experience. Rarely did the<br />

interviewee show objectivity just because it was someone else’s story. As in the second case study, the<br />

interviewee put in her own emotions and evaluations into these stories. <strong>The</strong>re were also times when<br />

listening to or recounting stories of those sharing her own tragic fate, she would experience similar or<br />

same trauma symptoms. Further deliberation is needed on how to process this aspect.<br />

References<br />

Kim Gui-ok et al, Memories of a War: <strong>The</strong> Orality of the Cold War, Seonin, 2008.<br />

Kim Gui-ok, “<strong>The</strong> Life Experiences and Identity of Defectors to South Korea in Settlements-Based on<br />

Sokcho ‘Abai Village’ and Gimjae ‘Yongji Farm’”, Seoul National University Ph. D. dissertation,<br />

1999.<br />

Kim Gui-ok, Separated Families, neither anti-communist warriors nor communists…, Yeoksabipyeongsa,<br />

629<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

2004.<br />

Kim Seong-rye, “A Methodical Reflection of Feminist Orality”, Feminist History Writing: Study Methods<br />

of the History of Orality, Arche, 2012.<br />

Kim Seung-min, “Division, Reunification and Korea’s <strong>Humanities</strong>”, A <strong>Humanities</strong> Paradigm of<br />

Reunification, Seonin Publishing, 2011.<br />

Kim Seong-min Park Yeong-gyun, “A Contemporary Reflection on the Trauma of Division”, <strong>The</strong> Epoch<br />

and Philosophy 21-1, Korea Society of Philosophy, 2010.<br />

Kim Jong-gun, “<strong>The</strong> True Nature of Trauma as Seen through Orality”, <strong>The</strong> Journal of the <strong>Humanities</strong> for<br />

Unification 51 st Issue, Konkuk University <strong>Humanities</strong> Research Institute, 2011.<br />

Kim Jong-gun, “<strong>The</strong> Memories of Ppalchisan as Seen in the Lives of Women from the Jirisan Vicinity”,<br />

<strong>The</strong> Journal of the <strong>Humanities</strong> 47 th Issue, Konkuk University <strong>Humanities</strong> Research Institute, 2009.<br />

Kim Jong-gun, “<strong>The</strong> Historical Trauma of North Korea Defectors and the Manifest Aspects of the<br />

Defection Trauma”, <strong>The</strong> Historical Trauma of Koreans, Seonin Publishing, 2012.<br />

Kim Jong-gun Jung Jin-ah, March of Suffering, Stories of North Korean Defectors, Pakeejeong<br />

Publishing, 2012.<br />

Kim Jun-ki, <strong>The</strong> Psychology of Healing as Seen in Movies, Sigma Books, 2009.<br />

Kim Jung-saeng, <strong>The</strong> Secret Entry of Joseon’s Voluntary Army and the Korean War, Myeongji Publishing,<br />

2000.<br />

Park Gyeong-yeol, “<strong>The</strong> Relative Truth of the 4.3 Incident as Seen in the Lives of Jeju Women”, <strong>The</strong><br />

Journal of the <strong>Humanities</strong> 47 th Issue, Konkuk University <strong>Humanities</strong> Research Institute, 2009.<br />

Park Yeong-gyun, “A Philosophical Reflection on the Habitus of Division”, <strong>The</strong> Epoch and Philosophy,<br />

Korea Society of Philosophy, 2010.<br />

Park Chan-seung, <strong>The</strong> Korean War in Villages, Dolbegae, 2010.<br />

Eum Gyeong-seon·Jang Jae-hwan, <strong>The</strong> Truth about the Kidnapped Fishermen of East Sea Coast, Sorak<br />

News, 2008.<br />

Ong, Walter J. (translated by Lee Ki-woo·Lim Myeong-jin), Orality and Literacy: <strong>The</strong> Technologizing of<br />

the Word, Moonye Publishing, 1995.<br />

Lee Byeong-soo, “<strong>The</strong> Characteristics and Ethics of the Division Trauma”, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> Paradigm of<br />

Reunification, Seonin, 2011.<br />

Lee Im-hwa, War Widows, Breaking the Silence in Korea’s Modern History, Chaekgwahamkke, 2010.<br />

Herman, Judith Lewis (translated by Choi Hyeon-jeong). Trauma and recovery: <strong>The</strong> aftermath of violence<br />

from domestic abuse to political terror, Planet, 2007.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Compilation Committee for Footsteps of Ethnic Koreans in China, Foundation, Beijing: Minjok<br />

Publishing Company, 1994.<br />

630


Deficiency, Expression and Mind Healing:<br />

Focusing on Selective Mutism 1<br />

Sunmi Hong<br />

Wonkwang University<br />

1. Introduction<br />

We intend to look for ways to apply humanitarian mind healing using psychoanalysis through explorative<br />

research into deficient and hurting minds and into selective mutism, which manifests itself when the<br />

deficiency affects self-expression.<br />

<strong>The</strong> object of healing in this context is the mind hurting from the relations that are formed from the<br />

moment when a human, a social animal, is born. A human being establishes not only organic but inorganic<br />

relations; and the mind gets hurt when there is a deficiency of something – when the desire, or what a<br />

human wants, is not fulfilled from relations as relations fall apart or become distant. <strong>The</strong>refore, the hurting<br />

mind affects relation either causally or consequentially and influences a society where such relations are<br />

formed.<br />

When we heal the mind, the subject looks for a way of healing from the pain arising out of deficiency, in<br />

other words the shortage that the subject experiences from the social relation. This takes into consideration<br />

the nature of humans as social organisms and puts emphasis on the importance of social health of humans,<br />

which is determined by relations. It is needless to say that social health is one of the preconditions to a<br />

healthy state as the WHO’s definition on health includes not only physical and mental health but also ‘social<br />

well-being.’<br />

From the moment when a human starts to exist, he is no longer alone but forms a relationship with an<br />

1 This paper received 2010 government grant (Academic Research Project Fund of Ministry of Education, Science and<br />

Technology) from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2010-361-A00008).<br />

631<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

object. <strong>The</strong>refore, relations hold an undetectable presence to human being. From the linguistic perspective,<br />

even when relations are terminated, it shall be described as ‘severed relation’ or ‘non-existent relation.’<br />

Health related to social relation is important especially for modern day humans who lead their basic<br />

biological life through social activities - economic activities - evolved from primitive or outdated ways<br />

of life. Such relations can be said to be ultimately founded on the relationship with family members. It<br />

has already been proven by a number of scholars that someone who has healthy family relations during<br />

childhood leads a healthier life in a society where many more relations are formed.<br />

We intend to define the hurting mind arising from the relational deficiency from a psychoanalytic<br />

perspective and to explore ways to address physical pain resulting from such a mind.<br />

From Sigmund Freud, who, as the founder of psychoanalysis, provides the foundation for our study,<br />

to the more contemporary Jacques Lacan, it has been pointed out that the unconscious experience of a<br />

person with a family during his childhood has a widespread affect on his sexual instinct, personality,<br />

social behavior as well as his creative activities or creation. If the unconscious experience is unfortunately<br />

a traumatic one, sometimes from the etiological context, such experiences stay dormant in a child as<br />

if a screen of memory and is expressed in a negative manner - for example, a neurotic episode. 2 <strong>The</strong><br />

motivated trauma may represent itself in various symptoms; but it is also directly present or implies itself<br />

as maintaining close relations with the event that caused the trauma. While various phenomena including<br />

symptoms may confuse the investigation into cases, neurosis - for example, hysteria - always talks about a<br />

specific event. 3<br />

In order to address neurotic symptoms, Freud suggested that when a patient is made to remember the<br />

event causing the hysteria, to refresh the feelings associated with the event, to describe the event in most<br />

details as possible and verbally express the feelings, the symptoms disappear and do not reoccur. In other<br />

words, for successful treatment, psychological processes carrying the emotion at the time of occurrence of<br />

the traumatic event should be verbally expressed. 4 It is not easy, however, to recount the event, much less<br />

to express the feelings of a traumatic event. Moreover, when the response or retaliatory feelings stay with<br />

the patient over time, remaining in the memory, it is not easy to find the correct expression for the original<br />

feeling. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is difficult for the subject to completely know the feeling when the traumatic event<br />

2 Sigmund Freud et J. Breuer, Études sur l’hystérie, PUF, 1956, pp. 1-2.<br />

3 «Un trauma est toujours suspect […] Vous ne pouvez jamais êre sû qu’un souvenir n’est pas souvenir-éran. […] un<br />

souvenir tel qu’il est imaginairement revéu – ce qu’est un souvenir-éran – est toujours suspect. Une image bloque toujours<br />

la véité.» in «Conféences aux Université nord-améicaines; Yale University, Kanzer Semina», Jacques Lacan, Scilicet n°<br />

6/7, 1975, pp. 7-31.<br />

4 Sigmund Freud et J. Breuer, Études sur l’hystérie, PUF, 1956, p. 4.<br />

632


occurred. Lacan suggested that a trauma is a ‘defective knowing (un savoir défaillant)’ without knowing<br />

what ‘I’ think. 5<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, to Lacan, when a trauma that suddenly surfaces cannot be described with words, it no longer<br />

is symbolic, and the trauma becomes a linguistic deficiency. You cannot say everything. As soon as it is<br />

spoken with words, a gap starts to exist in the reality of the event. It is deficiency of signifiers in linguistic<br />

structures. Structurally, a deficiency in others (S(A/)). 6 While humans are ‘speaking beings’ that create<br />

fragments of trauma, they are traumatized with the words being said. When faced with practical functions,<br />

trauma inherently becomes deficiency. <strong>The</strong> subject who does not wish to speak is born another way,<br />

sometimes using a means called symptoms. Freud’s Wolf Man had nightmares of wolves and trees due to<br />

his complex relationship with his father, but the trauma prevented him from doing anything: Lacan pointed<br />

out that in a situation where nothing can be done, there only was an act, not any behavior or action, 7 which<br />

in a Lacanian sense J. Miller expresses as suicide of the subject. 8 Miller, however, stressed that the subject<br />

is born in a different way. That is, to be born again in others, put linguistically, ‘you are.’ But the trauma is<br />

not expressed with words or symptoms. <strong>The</strong> trauma goes through the process of suffering and suppression<br />

coming from the situation that does not allow any movement or action, or is demonstrated as hysteric<br />

symptoms. For example, trauma results in physical symptoms as paralysis of face, and/or limbs, as well as<br />

autism, or linguistic barriers as was evident in Freud where he spoke in Latin losing his mother tongue of<br />

German.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y are kinds of neurotic symptoms, a responsive mechanism to a situation.<br />

Here, we will apply the healing method of transitioning signifiers of deficiency which is demonstrated<br />

as symptoms into expressions with images. This is to give an opportunity for fragmented images of<br />

memories, which are hovering in the unconsciousness of a subject without finding the signifiers of<br />

languages or the difficult system of symbols that fails to form a sound to be expressed not with language<br />

but with other means.<br />

Such images recreate the conditions of traumatic experience and represents cries of the hurting mind and<br />

the earnest desires of a patient with trauma, going through the process of healing the mind by filling or<br />

removing the gap - deficiency - in the extension of the signifiers turned into words.<br />

5 Jacques Lacan, Le Séminaire, Livre XVI, D’un Autre à l’autre, Paris, Seuil, 2006, p. 274.<br />

6 Jacques Lacan, Ecrits, Paris, Seuil, 1966, p. 818.<br />

7 Jacques Lacan, Le Séminaire, Livre XI, Les quatre concepts fondamentaux de la psychanalyse, Paris, Seuil, 1973, p. 50.<br />

8 Miller J. - A., «Jacques Lacan : remarques sur son concept de passage à l’acte», Mental, Paris, avril 2006, n°17, p. 21.<br />

633<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

2. Childhood and Registration of Image<br />

It is relations that cause motivation among the subject and works as a foundation. Under relations, desire<br />

is created, and desire with the instinct for expression is demonstrated through creative activities or creation<br />

itself. <strong>The</strong> relation between image and desire of the latter is mutual motivation and result. Symbolic images<br />

are vivid memories of subjects focused with instinctive desires. Symbols with more vivid symbolism<br />

are results of more vivid memories. <strong>The</strong> images, whether unconsciously or consciously, are recreation of<br />

fragmented scenes from traumatic conditions and scars with traumatic traces. Images are spread out as<br />

fragmented memory and give identity to the represented.<br />

In the process, the gap of the deficiency links the fragments 9 like welding, and it glides among the gaps to<br />

allow the sound submerged in the sea of silence to vocalize. <strong>The</strong> sound will be verbalized. <strong>The</strong> meaning of<br />

signifier and signified will be delivered to us more clearly. Along the process, we can expect a treatment<br />

effect on selective mutism as a symptom of a hurting mind by using psychoanalysis and art therapy.<br />

<strong>The</strong> traumatic period we choose is childhood. Both Freud and Lacan gave meaningful consideration for<br />

both time and field in the process where unconscious desire becomes motivation. It includes implications<br />

from the tragedy of the Oedipus complex. One is the childhood and the other is where there is a transition<br />

from unconscious to Oedipus exit, or the family that creates the incestuous desire.<br />

As image is related with desire, it can be a path leading us to unconsciousness. If the image maintains<br />

expression of unconscious desire, signifies relations and is from the period when the childhood desire is<br />

registered, it will not be difficult for us to find the trace of traumatic experience of childhood when we<br />

analyze and interpret the drawings of the client.<br />

Desire is destined to accompany deficiency. <strong>The</strong> desire is expressed through creation or creative activities.<br />

<strong>The</strong> relation between image and desire is mutual motivation and consequence at the same time. It is the<br />

period when a person feels deficient in linguistic ability and in expression as well as experiences the reality<br />

where deficiency and the bulging desire for expression is oppressed. It is also a childhood where a person<br />

has such unconscious and traumatic experience as to feel that the unconsciousness does or tries to castrate<br />

oneself. It is also a period where the unconscious mental mechanism of the superego is being created: as<br />

restrictions and taboos are learned without clearly knowing the interpretation, analysis or logic of the cause<br />

and effect and reasons; guilty conscience is experienced; and oppression starts to kick in.<br />

9 Michel Lapeyre, Clinique freudienne, Paris, Anthropos, 1996, p. 15.<br />

634


According to Antoine Vergote, the analysand who returns to his childhood during the process of creation<br />

- the event reoccurs to the analysand and he draws his childhood - dreams of a child through a drawing. 10<br />

In the process, whether it is something that exists or a vehicle to lead, many surrounding aspects are<br />

interpreted as signals for the relationship between a child and a mother. What is created into an image<br />

can be interpreted as symbol of mother. For example, the image of a house that is being recollected along<br />

with one’s childhood is a memory of old and recent relationship with one’s mother. <strong>The</strong> image is filled<br />

with the value of affection created from the history of the relationship. But at the same time, the image<br />

may carry significance through such various experiences as departure to unfamiliarity, return, internal<br />

closure and opening. It is like a door being opened for lost time, and it starts to let its presence known as<br />

if something completely new has taken the place of the existing which was there meaninglessly without<br />

being recognized.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, the image drawn by the analysand provides a style and an implication from a distant childhood.<br />

<strong>The</strong> image drawn reflects his current feelings and the history that he experienced. <strong>The</strong> feelings from all<br />

relations and the mood of relations are being visualized into the image. That is why interpreting a child’s<br />

drawing is like interpreting the mother who is significant to the child. It is like interpreting the family<br />

relation.<br />

3. Deficiency and Creator<br />

When a subject loses something that he desires or has some deficiency, the subject will represent the object<br />

of desire or the deficiency as vacant. If the subject is still at the stage of linguistic deficiency not to mention<br />

the stage of recollection, the ‘place of object’ will be a gap or a pit like a black hole, instead of being an<br />

aesthetic emptiness. <strong>The</strong> gap/pit must be the consequence of desire and obsession coming from ones own<br />

deficiency as if the empty space in the image. 11 In her paper ‘In Work of Art and the Leap of Creator,’<br />

Melanie Klein took an example of the absence of a mother’s image to infer that the subject launches a<br />

vicious attack and destroys the implication of the shape of his mother. Of course this case involves hatred<br />

accompanying the love for his mother. To a child, the metaphysical world of the mother’s body represents<br />

hostility or paranoia. In Melanie Klein’s theory, a premature oedipal desire gives rise to the obsession<br />

of fear of castration in boys and girls who are terrified of stealing the implication of the father’s penis or<br />

mother’s body. <strong>The</strong> obsession will come from the fear of being alone from the ‘loss of love’ and ‘loss of the<br />

object of love.’<br />

10 Antoine Vergote, La Psychanalyse à l’épreuve de la sublimation, Paris, Les Editions du CERF, 1997, p. 167.<br />

11 Mélanie Klein, Essaie de la psychanalyse 1921-1945, Paris, Payot, 1968, pp. 259-261.<br />

635<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

<strong>The</strong> lack of the image of a mother is like a stage where an image of a mother is not expressed due to<br />

obsession with the mother. Avoidance from mentioning the mother may represent advanced obsession<br />

with the mother. When a girl who is afraid of her mother’s physical attack does not look at her mother, the<br />

obsession is being emphasized. <strong>The</strong> existence of true loving mother is diminished by the fear of an awful<br />

one. Such implied image stays at the child’s current existence, at the present state of a child with symptom.<br />

At a later state, the implication of fear evolves. Instead of fearing for maternal attack, change occurs due to<br />

the loss of a true mother and what the girl is truly fearful for is being left alone, abandoned. At this, Melanie<br />

Klein gives an analogy that the most spectacular painting on a painter’s wall is sold. It is the loss of a space<br />

formerly filled. It was made empty. But the space has not disappeared. <strong>The</strong> space is still there. What has<br />

disappeared from the subject is an entity that has moved to a different place instead of expiring. On the<br />

other hand, didn’t you want the wall to be made empty? How can you describe the empty wall with words?<br />

In the inner side of a female subject, the meaning of the empty space is like herself with some deficiency.<br />

But wasn’t the empty space formerly filled? <strong>The</strong> empty wall cannot be filled with emptiness and it may<br />

return despondency to her. “<strong>The</strong> empty space” was a space in itself and therefore is an existence. A space<br />

inside the owner may be the feeling as if something is missing from one’s body. <strong>The</strong> empty space, which<br />

was once felt as something that cannot be made whole, is filled. When you look at the wall and imagine a<br />

painting on it, even if you want to get rid of it again, the act of imagining refills the wall. It is the intention<br />

of the reaction that follows the destroyer’s desire to recreate. This is how “a painting is a means for<br />

recreation.” <strong>The</strong>refore an empty space becomes a space for correction, desire to transform into something<br />

good, psychological bias toward mother, recreation of such bias, and the recognition of a need to draw.<br />

Clearly, the action of a creator has the function of corrector to a subject. <strong>The</strong> correction, however, is<br />

dependent on intervention of ego as well as instantaneous and relative correction of an object - even when<br />

without the impulse of instinct. And the object, in this instance, is the narcissistic self that loves oneself that<br />

forms a part of the subject. In the end, correcting an object is to correct the subject himself.<br />

4. Deficiency and Desire Conspired with Image<br />

To speak about Lacan’s image of desire, the image is explained through its relation with the object that<br />

induces deficiency or castration. <strong>The</strong> image carries the relations where deficiency causes desire and desire<br />

gives rise to deficiency. To a psychoanalyst, “human desire is desire for the others.” 12 While to Freud, the<br />

object of desire is from the lost object; to Lacan, petit a. <strong>The</strong> desire holds libido and becomes libidinal desire.<br />

12 Jacques Lacan, “Introduction à la structure de l’angoisse”, L’ Angoisse, Séminaire X, PUF., 1982, p. 32.<br />

636


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

5. Selective Mutism from Deficiency<br />

<strong>The</strong> author intends to focus on loss of words, especially selective mutism out of various reactions related<br />

to traumatic experience. <strong>The</strong> research will begin by stressing selective mutism as a kind of reaction from<br />

traumatic experience.<br />

While temporary or selective aphasia in a child may represent serious neurosis of autism, an adult may<br />

demonstrate pretend aphasia related to depression or autistic condition. Compared to the complete loss of<br />

speech, or aphasia, selective mutism is loss of speech when faced with one or many particular situation(s)<br />

combined. <strong>The</strong> psychoanalysis finds the period or location where such symptoms, which are still being<br />

discovered, are established on childhood and family which is of the highest interest as the period and<br />

location for forming unconscious experience. 14 Moreover, selective mutism may be demonstrated in front<br />

of a particular person. While the symptoms of selective mutism are not often recognized at home during<br />

childhood, they tend to intensify when the child starts to attend a school, where the symptoms are identified<br />

by teachers. This means that selective mutism is demonstrated in a way that a child with a good command<br />

of language in front of family members or someone familiar does not or cannot speak temporarily or to a<br />

particular person. Many people who experience mutism actually complain lack of speech in a particular<br />

situation.<br />

It can be viewed as a neurotic symptom and a kind of response mechanism toward a condition. While<br />

temporary or selective aphasia in a child may represent serious neurosis of autism, an adult may demonstrate<br />

pretend aphasia related to depression or autistic condition.<br />

It is an exemplary demonstration of a theory on neurotic mechanism which helped establish Freud as a<br />

prominent psychoanalyst. Selective mutism that entails such Freudian interpretation and Lacan’s linguistic<br />

deficiency can be viewed as the mind hurting.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are many causes for selective mutism from a number of clinical cases. Historical causes include<br />

neurotic response of the child’s family, namely unresolved psycho dynamic conflict with an overly<br />

protective mother or stern and emotionally distant father. Also, early trauma or change in the environment<br />

can be identified as a clear inducer for the condition. Recently, attempts have been made to connect selective<br />

mutism in a child with social phobia in adults, and studies are under way to interpret it as a symptom or<br />

subtype of anxiety disorder or social anxiety in childhood. Such hypotheses have the tendency to view<br />

14 Judith A. Yanof, Langage, Communication, and, transfrence in child Analyse I. Selective mutisme: <strong>The</strong> Medium is the<br />

message II. Is child Analysis really analysis?”, Journal of the American Psychoanlytic Association, 44:79-119, 1996.<br />

638


children as excessively shy and withdrawn and rigid in social context.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, there is a possibility to explore selective mutism on the basis of psychoanalytic theory. As the<br />

study of psychoanalysis has interest on the subject and object (Object a), to put it differently, the relationship<br />

between the subject and the object of desire, it can be an attractive methodology for the purpose of research<br />

that values relations.<br />

<strong>The</strong> intended approach is to apply the process of addressing symptoms that can be treated as a result of<br />

traumatic experiences to the analytic process of psychoanalysis. That is, based on the theory of deficiency,<br />

to apply to patients of selective mutism the analytic process of healing a hurting mind by encouraging the<br />

patient to speak about one’s traumatic experience where he cannot respond or intends to retaliate against and<br />

to express the object of one’s deficiency/desire. Expression of the object of deficient desire leads to treatment<br />

of one’s neurotic symptom. Art supplies will be used to utilize images in the process of leading deficiency<br />

into expression.<br />

<strong>The</strong> author intends to introduce the method of mind healing with a case of selective mutism. <strong>The</strong> case of P<br />

(age 14, female, middle school student) is a classic example of the concept of DSM-IV that defines selective<br />

mutism. Like many other cases, P’s selective mutism was identified by teachers whom she met when she<br />

first entered nursery and elementary school. <strong>The</strong> initial treatment started 3 years from when the parents were<br />

first notified of the problem. <strong>The</strong> treatment was resumed when P was in middle school. My encounter was<br />

during the period of second treatment. P was diagnosed with selective mutism by a doctor. I intend to stress<br />

the need for support and cooperative medical treatment from medicine to enhance humanitarian healing. I<br />

started the healing process based on the medical diagnosis of a doctor. I intend to analyze the image shared<br />

by P and identify the direction of the mind healing.<br />

P did not speak during classes and was extremely shy. She has a grandmother, both parents and a younger<br />

brother. <strong>The</strong>re was no particular aspect in family relation that might have caused the social problem.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, healing just like any other analysis began ambiguously without knowing the reason. <strong>The</strong> only<br />

prior information was from the mother that P could not talk out of shyness. As the case did not have any<br />

consciously identified family problem, I decided to take the analysis process to first encourage P to use<br />

drawings without giving any keywords and afterward explain the drawing with words. 15<br />

15 <strong>The</strong> author intends to put strict restriction on detailed description on the healing process and personal details of the client<br />

as the intention of introducing the case is to highlight the ‘deficiency’ and inner world demonstrated by the image rather<br />

than focusing on the actual research case.<br />

639<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

<strong>The</strong> objective of healing was to improve the ability to respond spontaneously and to express herself by<br />

providing P with a sense of security and trust as she complained that when she was asked a question during<br />

class she felt terrified and could not speak. Healing in the cognitive perspective helped her to recognize that<br />

various interpretations and responses are possible for a situation or an event and provided her with the sense<br />

of security and confidence that her response could be right and that during the healing process any mistake<br />

or fault should not be a problem. It was also recognized that at school a mistaken response or an error does<br />

not bring about significant responsibility or shame, and discussions also accompanied to help P be aware<br />

of the mistaken response or error among colleagues. In order to improve her ability to respond quickly, to<br />

boost confidence, to choose the most relevant response by diversifying her response, we chose to apply such<br />

a method, as thematic drawing test images of the suggested subject are drawn with various interpretations.<br />

Behaviorally, I encouraged P to make big movements or loud sounds to infuse her with confidence and to<br />

provide behavioral healing. <strong>The</strong>y were done on P only without the help of parents or school.<br />

<strong>The</strong> images from the healing process prove our psychoanalytic theory. Pic 1 shows that P was withdrawn<br />

and lacking confidence as the size of the small house in HTP suggests. P refused to draw any person. During<br />

the second session, when I encouraged her to draw a person, she drew characters (Pic 3). Next was to<br />

prepare a name tag. P also drew a character, not a person, and wrote ‘what are you looking at’ suggesting<br />

high passivity in exposing herself and gave herself a comical nickname. <strong>The</strong> nickname demonstrated playing<br />

with the signifier of her name by adding an “o” sound, which is like the middle syllable of “ko-yang-i(cat).”<br />

In particular, the rather bold expression, ‘what are you looking at,’ seemed to express her inner aggression.<br />

<strong>The</strong> phrase and the satisfactory smile on the character’s face were impressive. It was in stark contrast with<br />

her speech pattern, which was so quite that special attention was needed to hear her, and her extremely<br />

careful attitude, timid laugh or smile. Afterward, P asked if she could draw something she liked, and she<br />

drew a cat (Pic 5) with her full name clearly under it. To gauge her sociality, I gave her paper and a medium<br />

that only had symbolic representation. Also, inside the school that P created was a cat. Though small in size,<br />

it was a cat that gazes down at her school. P said she thought about cats often at school. P also said that her<br />

relationship with friends at school was at a level that did not give her any stress, stating that she could find<br />

meaning and calm from gazing and observing them. When P did decalcomania to freely express her inner<br />

world (Pic 7), she expressed the image as “an Amazon forest with the sea and the sun circling around.”<br />

When given the theme of fishbowl utilizing the symbolic connection of the signified and asked to draw a<br />

family of fish (Pic 8), P exposed signifier of fish family members with various facial expressions and of two<br />

fish expressing love. Next, when presented with an apple tree with various shapes of apples, P expressed her<br />

relationship with the family without any filter. Unlike before, P took the initiative in explaining her family<br />

members and became more active and engaged. P was given an opportunity to express her idea on ‘man and<br />

woman,’ that is, the inner world of sexual value (Pic 10, 11). When given the idea of a room door being open<br />

and the thematic image, P drew her cat (Pic 12). P explained that it was her cat that her grandmother killed<br />

640


while P was away at nursery by feeding the cat some rat poison because it was too cumbersome for her to<br />

take care of. P said she hated her grandmother for killing the cat she loved. P also said that the grandmother<br />

yells at her mother but that P had a good relationship with her father. P said that her mother preferred her<br />

brother. <strong>The</strong> family relations were explained with the death of the cat. When encouraged to bring a new cat<br />

home, P refused, saying, “my grandmother might kill it again.” She said that she came back home one day<br />

only to find out that her cat was dead. She felt sad but soon was shocked to find out that it was killed with<br />

poison; so shocked to lose words. Her father and grandmother had a big argument over it. She said it was<br />

her father and her who liked the cat the most. <strong>The</strong>n she said to mimic the sound of the cat and said “mew”<br />

with such gust and valor that P had never shown before, as if inhibited sound was finally coming out. When<br />

I said such a brave cat with a strong voice will escape easily from her grandmother, she was very happy.<br />

I was able to understand that when P said her father only played computer games, she meant to say that<br />

the relationship with her father felt distant after the death of the cat, which they both loved, for they failed<br />

to find an alternative mutual pleasure. P visualized ‘her brother in puberty and her with fish’ (Pic 13). As P<br />

decorated the drawing with flowers unlike her frequent expression of jealousy to her brother, I encouraged<br />

P to have ‘confidence’ and recommended drawing therapy where she can draw bold lines (Pic 14). When<br />

encouraged to make a creation to restore her sense of pride and emotional stability by completing a project,<br />

P wrote the name of her favorite celebrity. She drew her playing in the ground with a boy that she had a<br />

crush on and then fish (Pic 17). And P explained her drawing, saying that she liked the boy. And on the<br />

theme proposed next, P said it was the staircase of an apartment she had to climb, and finished the drawing<br />

with a lightening rod. As she became much more active, I conducted HTP and KHTP, which were the pre-<br />

tests on her before the healing process, and P was able to draw a person. She was much more confident<br />

drawing bold lines, and she recreated the image of the person coming closer to the house.<br />

Around that time, P’s mother suggested to end the session as there was improvement in P’s interaction with<br />

friends, answering questions during class and responding to people in general.<br />

6. Conclusion<br />

<strong>The</strong> paper reviewed the theory on psychoanalysis regarding traumatic experiences that leave behind the<br />

signifier of deficiency and the images applied to heal the trauma. In the process, we were able to witness<br />

the replacement of desire as addressed in the study of psychoanalysis. <strong>The</strong> loss of an object of love and<br />

discovery of its replacement helped regain confidence – the celebrity that gives her pleasure instead of the<br />

cat that was no longer present as well as a celebrity and a boyfriend as gorgeous as her father who played<br />

with the cat.<br />

641<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

While experiencing the loss of her object without any proper response, without saying anything about<br />

the loss – though she cried – she might have closed her mouth to stop speaking as if wanting to become<br />

someone who could not speak. Whether silence or paralysis, all symptoms are like a signal to the outside<br />

world. It is like ‘what you want’ – want you want to say – or your guilty conscience. Or maybe, by<br />

recreating your non-responsive response – the response of not doing anything – at the time when the event<br />

happened, you might want to go back to when it happened and undo it. Our duty as provider of mind healing<br />

is to interpret the signal correctly, let the client recognize the cause of hurting mind and the meaning of<br />

deficiency, and ultimately strengthen the deficiency.<br />

A human, due to his inability, often lives with losing the object with which he has relation. When it is an<br />

object of love, he lives on with grief and the deficient object inside. When we say hurting mind, it refers to<br />

the existence of deficient object in the mind. Sometimes, the deficient object can be found – only with the<br />

precondition of accurate recognition of the deficient object and when the problem was only due to not-so-<br />

active ‘response’ of oneself. When such inappropriate response is recognized and expressed appropriately,<br />

and if the object still exists, we can have it back. But how can we heal the mind hurting from deficiency of<br />

an object that we cannot find or have back? This is when replacement or sublimation comes in – while you<br />

cannot accurately recreate the cat and the love of the father enjoyed with the cat, you can still find joy and<br />

pleasure from your favorite celebrity or another object that excites you. <strong>The</strong>n, we need to know what the lost<br />

object means.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fragment from recollecting traumatic experience of loss does not only function as a signifier but also<br />

as signified and symbol. <strong>The</strong> meaning that is correctly identified and replaced can compensate for the<br />

deficiency and fill the gap created by such deficiency. <strong>The</strong> order of thematic drawings that goes between<br />

symbol and imaginary world by means of association and provides signified and signifier is not different<br />

from the psychoanalysis theories addressed earlier. <strong>The</strong>refore, we can use the psychoanalysis theories which<br />

are criticized and avoided due to the Oedipus complex, an unconscious trauma borrowed from the myth<br />

more actively in art therapy and in healing the mind.<br />

When the hurting mind from all kinds of relations is healed, restoration of the damaged or lost relation<br />

means improved expression of the object – like expression of loving the object. <strong>The</strong>refore, in the process of<br />

mind healing, as they have difficulty in expressing their minds with ordinary language, we should give them<br />

the opportunity to express with works of art the desire or parts of deficiency being held inside and should<br />

have the ability to accurately interpret the signified and signifier expressed in the image. As mind healing<br />

with images promotes communication – improved ability to express – with the outside world in various<br />

methods, social relations can be improved, and the subject’s social wellbeing to recognize self-presence can<br />

be advanced.<br />

642


References<br />

Badiou. Alain, Roudinesco. Elisabeth, Jacques Lacan, Passé Présent, Paris, Seuil, 2012.<br />

David R. Hawkins, Power Vs. Force : <strong>The</strong> Hidden Determinants of Human Behavior, Hay House Edition,<br />

February 2002.<br />

Carton. Solange, Chabert. Catherine, Corcos. Maurice, Les silence des émotions, Paris, Dunod, Paris.<br />

Freud, Sigmund et Breuer, J., Études sur l’hystérie, PUF, 1956.<br />

Greig. Philippe, L’enfnat et son dessin, Cahors, ERES, 2003.<br />

Klein. Mélanie , Essaie de la psychanalyse 1921-1945, Paris, Payot, 1968.<br />

Lacan. Jacques, “Introduction à la structure de l’angoisse,” L’Angoisse, Séminaire X, PUF., 1982.<br />

-Écrits, Seuil, Paris, 1966.<br />

-«Conféences aux Université nord-améicaines ;Yale University, Kanzer Semina», Scilicet n° 6/7, 1975.<br />

-Le Séminaire, Livre XI, Les quatre concepts fondamentaux de la psychanalyse, Paris, Seuil, 1973.<br />

-Le Séminaire, Livre XVI, D’un Autre à l’autre, Paris, Seuil, 2006, p. 274.<br />

Lapeyre. Michel, Clinique freudienne, Paris, Anthropos, 1996..<br />

Royer Jacqueline, Que nous disent les dessins d’enfant, Paris, Hommes et Perspectives, 2005.<br />

Miller J.-A., «Jacques Lacan : remarques sur son concept de passage à l’acte ,” Mental, Paris, avril 2006, n°17.<br />

Schack. Juliane, Comprendre les dessins d’ enfant, Canale, Marabout, 2000.<br />

Vergote. Antoine , La Psychanalyse à l’épreuve de la sublimation, Paris, Les Editions du CERF, 1997.<br />

Yanof. Judith A., Langage, Communication, and, transference in child Analyses I. Selective mutisme: <strong>The</strong><br />

Medium is the message II. Is child Analysis really analysis?,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic<br />

Association, 44:79-119, 1996.<br />

Kwank Young-Sook, “Play therapy of a six year old with selective mutism,” Journal of Child & Adolescent<br />

Psychiatry, Volume 3 Number 1, 1992.<br />

American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, Fourth Edition<br />

(DSM-IV), Korean translation by Lee Keun-Hoo, Seoul, Hanamedical, 1995.<br />

Min S ung-Kil, Latest Psychiatry, Seoul, Aljokak, 2008.<br />

Shim Eung-Chul, Psychology and Life, Seoul, Seohyunsa, 2008.<br />

Lee Young-Shik, Nam Bum-Woo, Kim Jong-Bum, “First experience of treatment of 15 old boy showing<br />

selective mutism with Fluoxetine,” Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association, Volume 35,<br />

Number 2, 1996.<br />

Kim Tae-Ryun, Seo Bong-Yeon, Lee Eun-Hwa, Hong Sook-Ki, Korean Children’s Apperception Test<br />

(K-CAT), Seoul, Korea Guidance, 1993.<br />

Jung Sun-Joo, Hong Ka-Eui, “Clinical feature of children with selective mutism and prognosis,” Journal of<br />

Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Volume 6 Number 1, 1995.<br />

Cho Soo-Chul, Pediatric Psychopharmacology, Seoul, Seoul National University Press, 2000.<br />

643<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Parallel Session 3-3<br />

Busan City: 20C Busan, its Scars and Healing<br />

1. Poésie Dedicated to the Forefront of Korean History<br />

/ Yol-Kyu Kim (Sogang University)<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> Scars and Healing of the Korean War Refugees<br />

/ Chulwook Cha (Pusan National University)<br />

3. Sansoo Lee Jong-Ryul’s National History: <strong>The</strong> Scars of Wounds<br />

and the Current History<br />

/ Man-joon Park (Dongeui University)<br />

4. Envisioning a Modern Busan at a Corner of Sanbok Road<br />

/ Dong Jin Kang (Kyungsung University)


Poésie Dedicated to the Forefront of Korean History<br />

Yol-Kyu Kim<br />

Sogang University<br />

1) Busan, the Status of its Topography<br />

Busan is located in the southeastern part of the Korean peninsula. <strong>The</strong> city has its back against the Korean<br />

peninsula and proudly faces the sea. Its location and geographical features tell us that Busan is a vanguard<br />

city that sits in the eastern end of the country.<br />

In many cases, people liken the Korea peninsula to the shape of a rabbit and Busan to a tail of the rabbit,<br />

but this makes no sense. Busan is not a tail of the rabbit, but is more similar to a mouth of a tiger that is<br />

closed tight toward the direction of the sea.<br />

And Busan overlooks both East Sea and South Sea, which tranquilly surround the city. In other words,<br />

Busan proudly looks down at the sea where the sun rises at dawn and the sea is connected to the Pacific<br />

Ocean.<br />

From Haeundae Beach to Gwangalli Beach and Busan Port, and again to Nampo, Songdo, Gamnae and<br />

to Dadaepo, the coastlines are endless across hundreds and thousands of meters, and they wrap their arms<br />

around Busan. Reaching beyond the Straits of Korea, Busan overlooks Japan, China and countries in<br />

Southeast Asia and the Pacific Ocean. As illustrated above, Busan is located along the coast and facing<br />

the ocean in front of it. It is truly a city that is located at the forefront or at the so-called cutting edge of the<br />

Korean Peninsula, and thus can be called a vanguard city of Korea.<br />

In addition, other topics can also be brought up in relation with the geographical location of Busan – being<br />

at the forefront of the Korean Peninsula.<br />

647<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

‘This region is like the neck of the country (Nam-Yo-In-Hoo: )’ and like ‘the keyhole of<br />

the country (Seo-Moon-Swae-Yak: )’<br />

<strong>The</strong> above-mentioned words are engraved on the monuments standing on both sides of Jaseongdae<br />

( ) located in Busanjin.<br />

Nam-Yo-In-Hoo means ‘the neck of a remote country in the southern region’ while Seo-Moon-Swae-<br />

Yak refers to ‘the Door in the West is locked.’ <strong>The</strong> former describes the topological location of the city,<br />

indicating that Busan is located in the region, which is equivalent to the neck of the Korean Peninsula.<br />

Nam-Yo ( ) literally means the remote area in the southern part of the Korean Peninsula, which<br />

highlights the topographical location of Busan in comparison with the entire Korean Peninsula. Since the<br />

city is both the front and the end of the Korean Peninsula, it is liken to the neck of the country.<br />

In other words, Busan is like the neck or the throat of the human body. As you are well aware, the throat<br />

is like a lifeline for people. People eat food, breath in and out using their throat. It is the throat ( ) that<br />

acts as a gateway sending air into the lungs and food down into the stomach.<br />

Located at the southern forefront of the country, Busan is like the throat that serves as a gateway of the<br />

Korean Peninsula or the lifeline of the country.<br />

Such a topographical location of Busan is highly symbolic because it demonstrates the roles and<br />

responsibilities of the city in Korean history and culture and has highly symbolic and cultural worth.<br />

Busan is indeed at the forefront of Korea not just in its topographical location but also in the country’s<br />

history.<br />

2) <strong>The</strong> History of Busan began as early as the Prehistoric Times…<br />

Busan is Korea’s largest metropolitan city that includes Dongrae, Sasang and Gijang and its history dates<br />

back to prehistoric times. Korea’s No.1 port city, Busan, existed at the forefront of the Korean Peninsula<br />

even at the beginning of the country back in the prehistoric times.<br />

‘In the beginning, there existed the port with people. Its name is Busan.’<br />

Surprisingly, archeological ruins of the Bronze Age and the Neolithic Age as well as the Paleolithic Era<br />

648


have been discovered in various parts of Busan.<br />

Chungsapo of Haeundae Beach is one of the major ruins inherited from the Paleolithic Era.<br />

Chungsapo is a small town located along the shallow shore of a long estuary at the end of ‘Greeting the<br />

Moon Hill’ of the small peninsula in the Southeastern region of the city. Chungsapo is overlooking the<br />

vast open ocean and has fine sandy beaches as well as the port with the blue sand.<br />

If you miss the scenery of Seokguram’s morning,<br />

You will regret it.<br />

When you see the evening moon in Haeundae,<br />

You will miss it more and more.<br />

Hooray, it is so magnificent.<br />

Hooray, it is so beautiful.<br />

<strong>The</strong> country’s nature boasts scenic beauty.<br />

<strong>The</strong> above is the lyrics of the popular song of the 1930s: ‘<strong>The</strong> Eight Views of Korea.’ “<strong>The</strong> more I see the<br />

evening moon in Haeundae, the more I miss it” is portraying the evening moon that shines more brightly<br />

in the areas of Chungsapo located at the end of ‘Greeting the Moon Hill.’ Chungsapo is the place where<br />

the history of Busan originated and the remnants of the Paleolithic Era still stand today, and thus it is<br />

rightly the very place to sing about the evening moon in Haeundae. Our ancestors in the Paleolithic Era<br />

must have sung about the evening moon shining over the Moon Hill. <strong>The</strong>n, Gowoon Choi chi-won named<br />

the place with a beautiful evening moon ‘Haeundae’ to assign it a meaning.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are other relics from the Neolithic Era (7,000~8,000 years ago) that have been found in Busan.<br />

<strong>The</strong> shell mound from the Neolithic Era – in addition to shell mounds from the Paleolithic Era –<br />

was discovered in Jwa-dong and Joong-dong. Other relics from the Neolithic Era were also found in<br />

Beombang-dong, a Busan district located on the boundary of Busan and Gimhae and on the boundary of<br />

Dongsam-dong and Yeongsun-dong.<br />

<strong>The</strong> topic of ‘the Prehistoric Busan’ may be able to be discussed separately because there are considerable<br />

amounts of relics from prehistoric times. Of those relics discovered, particularly those remnants found in<br />

Chungsapo, Jwa-dong and Joong-dong highlight the fact that the area of Haeundae was a central place in<br />

the Prehistoric Busan.<br />

Today, Haeundae is one of the most popular tourist attractions and popular beaches across the country.<br />

649<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Way back in prehistoric times, it was a hub of the prehistoric culture that laid the foundation for its history.<br />

As a matter of fact, people have lived, survived or enjoyed their lives in the area of Haeundae throughout<br />

the course of the past ten thousand years.<br />

Haeundae is not the only the place where the relics from the prehistoric times were discovered. Shell<br />

mounds and dolmen from the prehistoric age were discovered in Dongsam-dong in Yeong-do, an area on<br />

the right side of Haeundae as well as Oryukdo and at the end of the inner harbor of Busan. Shell mounds<br />

from the Bronze Age were found in Dongrae, an inland area located far from the sea.<br />

<strong>The</strong> coastline reaching Haeundae to Yeong-do and the land reaching Yeong-do to Dongrae account for<br />

four-fifths of the entire land in Busan Metropolitan City. And it can be stated that Busan has historic traces<br />

not just from the Neolithic Era and the Paleolithic Era but also from the Bronze Age, and it was already a<br />

metropolitan city way back in prehistoric times.<br />

In short, Busan is a city that preserves the site from the prehistoric times and is at the forefront of the<br />

country not just in terms of its topographical location but also in terms of its history.<br />

3) <strong>The</strong> Rich History that Shines Even More over Time<br />

As explained above, Busan has long been a place for living for people throughout history, way back from<br />

the Paleolithic Era, which dates back over 10,000 years.<br />

Some academic researchers surmised that Busan underwent the Neolithic Era for approximately 4,000<br />

years from B.C. 5000 to B.C. 1000 and argued that quite many people began to live in the city of Busan<br />

since that time. Such a supposition was made based on the discovery of shell mounds found in a total of<br />

18 sites in Dongsam-dong, Yeongsun-dong, Amnam-dong, Dadae-dong, Geumgok-dong, Gangdong-dong<br />

and Noksan-dong.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fact that many shell mounds from the Neolithic Era were found in Busan indicates that the city was a<br />

place for living and a nesting place for people in the Neolithic Era. Way back in ancient times, Busan was<br />

already a place for people living alongside the coastline of the region to make a living and to survive. It<br />

may be no exaggeration to say that Busan was not merely an ocean city; rather, it was like the ocean itself<br />

that provides people with the means of survival.<br />

Entering into the historic period after going through prehistoric times, Busan continued to play a certain<br />

role in sustaining people’s lives in the region and leave its trace in history.<br />

650


Dolmens found in Doogu-dong in Geumjeong-gu, Shin-ri in Gijang and Boonjeol town in Migeum-dong<br />

tell us that Busan also went through the Bronze Age.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are six dolmens or stone graves in Boonjeol town. To make a dolmen, people had to bury a<br />

deceased person in the ground and lay a horizontal stone supported by several vertical stones. In some<br />

cases, a horizontal stone was laid directly over the ground without being supported by vertical stones.<br />

Stones used for dolmens are really large and make us wonder how people in the Bronze Age moved<br />

such large stones and what kinds of devices they might have used to move stones. Dolmens, which used<br />

extremely large stones, were obviously dedicated to some eminent figures of the Bronze Age. It is said<br />

that only the heads of communities or leaders were buried beneath the dolmens. In other words, only<br />

leaders of tribal societies had the honor of being buried beneath the dolmens during the Bronze Age.<br />

As pointed out above, as several dolmens were discovered in the three sites of Busan, it is possible to<br />

guess that the city must have been a residential area during the Bronze Age and large tribes lived in several<br />

parts of the city during that Age.<br />

However, the relics from the Bronze Age are mostly found on the mountain sides, areas far from the<br />

ocean, indicating that the era when people ate clams for survival was passed by then and the agricultural<br />

era must have begun sometime during the Bronze Age. Back then, people living in Busan were scattered<br />

across both the coastline and the mountain side.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ironware made of cast iron excavated from a shell mound in Nakmin-dong in Dongrae tells us that the<br />

Iron Age followed the Bronze Age. In more than 10 ancient tombs found in Yeonnam-dong, iron knives,<br />

iron tips and iron axes from the Period of the Three States were excavated.<br />

In a shell mound found in Nakmin-dong, molten iron pieces were excavated, telling us that there must<br />

have been a steel mill or smelting factory in the area back in the very early history of Korea. Considering<br />

this fact, Busan is also a pioneering city in Korean history that is on the cutting edge of national history.<br />

Of many ironware remains excavated in the region, the ancient tomb found in Bokcheon-dong must be<br />

emphasized as one of the major discoveries. <strong>The</strong>re were many iron hatchets, iron chisels, sickles and<br />

arrowheads that are considered to be from the 4 th century or 6 th century inside the ancient tomb.<br />

As seen above, a series of discoveries of the remnants and relics from the Neolithic Era, the Pathologic<br />

Era and from the Iron Age have continued in Busan. It can be stated that, since prehistoric times, the city<br />

651<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

has experienced vivid details of Korean history from the Period of the Three States to the Gaya Period.<br />

That is so true. As a major port city of the country, Busan has been shining throughout the long and varied<br />

history of Korea. <strong>The</strong> older the relics get, the brighter the history of them will shine. Busan has long been<br />

at the forefront of Korean history as a major port city throughout prehistoric times.<br />

4) At the Forefront of Korean Medieval Times<br />

Supported by its topological location and geographical characteristics, Busan has gone through a long<br />

detailed history of the country. Rather than passively overcoming the rough waves of history, the city<br />

undauntedly fought back the waves and built its own history. Haeundae and Dongsam-dong were the<br />

places of origin for the prehistoric times and the city again underwent the ancient and medieval times<br />

to reach the pre-modern and the modern period. Through a long and eventful journey of history, Busan<br />

continued to build its own history in a highly proactive manner.<br />

That is why the history of Busan is like an epic. <strong>The</strong> history of Busan itself is like an epic journey that<br />

penetrates the entire history of Korea. In this sense, no other cities in Korea can match Busan.<br />

Korea’s international relationship during medieval times was limited to relationships with Japan and<br />

China. Unfortunately, China was a suzerain country and Korea, as a vassal country of China, was in a<br />

subordinate relationship to China. <strong>The</strong>refore, there could be no conflicts or confrontations between the<br />

two countries.<br />

However, the diplomatic relationship with Japan was different. Japan was both a gateway to international<br />

trade and a base camp for Japanese raiders ( ). Japan’s position was very obvious in the regions along<br />

the coastline of the southeastern part of the Korean Peninsula, especially in Busan. <strong>The</strong> city served as an<br />

outpost of Japanese invaders and thus it bore the brunt of troubled relations between Korea and Japan.<br />

Japanese trading and living quarters on the Korean Peninsula were called Waegwan and, in Busan, there<br />

was one of the major Waegwans in Busanpo. Japanese people first settled in Busanjin, the military base<br />

in Busan, and later moved their settlement to the downtown of the city. <strong>The</strong> old settlement of Japanese<br />

people in Busan was called ‘Gogwan: Old Japanese Settlement’ or ‘Googwan: Former-Japanese<br />

Settlement.’ That is why the area in Sojeong-dong is called ‘Gogwan’ or ‘Googwan.’<br />

Due to the city’s geographical and historic standing, Japan chose Busan as an outpost of the invasion into<br />

the Korean Peninsula during the Japanese invasion of Korea in 1592. Japan occupied the city and used it<br />

652


as its forces’ rear base during the invasion. That was the time when the Japanese forces built the ‘Jaseongdae<br />

Japanese Fortress’ in Busan.<br />

Of approximately 20 fortresses built by Japanese forces during the Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592<br />

and the following invasion during the period from 1597 to 1598, the only fortress that has survived<br />

throughout the history of the country is the ‘Jaseongdae Japanese Fortress’ in Busan.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ‘Jaseongdae Japanese Fortress’ is in stark contrast to the ‘Dongpeyonghyun ( ) Fortress’ found<br />

in Danggam-dong. <strong>The</strong> ‘Dongpeyonghyun ( ) Fortress’ was built to fight against the invading<br />

Japanese forces sometime around the mid Goryo Dynasty whereas the ‘Jaseongdae Japanese Fortress’<br />

was built by Japanese forces. In other words, Busan has two different kinds of fortresses that were built by<br />

Japanese forces and by Korean people to fight against them. Having the fortresses of both the enemy and<br />

friendly forces is a very rare case - even on the Korean Peninsula.<br />

Meanwhile, there is another historic site ( ) that could be compared in stark contrast to the ‘Jaseongdae<br />

Japanese Fortress.’ That is one located in Busanjin called ‘Jeonggongdan.’ ‘Jeonggongdan’ was built to<br />

honor Cheomsa ( ) General Jeong Bal who gave his precious life while fighting against Japanese<br />

forces during the Japanese invasion of Korea in 1592.<br />

After occupying Busan, Japanese forces stayed in the city for as long as 7 years, and during that time they<br />

built ‘Jaseongdae Japanese Fortress.’ Although ‘Jaseongdae Japanese Fortress’ and ‘Jeonggongdan’ are<br />

located in Jwacheon-dong and Beomil-dong respectively, they are located very close to each other and<br />

both are located within Busanjin.<br />

As illustrated above, Japanese people moved their settlement (Waegwan) within Busan several times and<br />

continued to live in the city during the Joseon Dynasty Period. That is, Busan local residents and Japanese<br />

people lived close to each other in the same neighborhood.<br />

Based on the above historical evidence, we can say that Korean people and Japanese people coexisted<br />

in Busan during the Joseon Dynasty Period. However, there are other examples highlighting the<br />

confrontational relationship between Korea and Japan during the Joseon Dynasty Period.<br />

<strong>The</strong> relationship between the ‘Jaseongdae Japanese Fortress’ and the ‘Dongpeyonghyun ( )<br />

Fortress’ and the relationship between the ‘Jaseongdae Japanese Fortress’ and the ‘Jeonggongdan’ indicate<br />

the hostile relationship between the invading Japanese and the Joseon Dynasty’s defending forces.<br />

653<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

To sum up, Busan was an outpost of the Japanese invaders that bears the brunt of the confrontational<br />

relationship between the Joseon Dynasty and Japan. As the Joseon-Japan relationship was one of the<br />

important diplomatic relationships for the Joseon Dynasty, it can be argued that Busan was again at the<br />

forefront of Korean history during the Joseon Dynasty.<br />

5) At the Forefront of Korean Modern Times<br />

Busan continued to act as a pioneering city that is at the forefront of Korea’s pre-modern and modern<br />

history and culture.<br />

While Korea was under Japanese colonization, Busan served as a spokesperson for Korean history. <strong>The</strong><br />

portrait of Busan drawn at that time shows the vivid history of Korea while under Japanese colonization<br />

( ) or under Japanese rule.<br />

At that time, Busan was boasting its status as a major port city of the country where ‘government ( )<br />

ferries’ come and go. <strong>The</strong> #1 pier was dedicated to the ferries that come and go between Shimonoseki and<br />

Hakwan ( ) in Japan and Busan on a regular basis. To Japanese people, Busan was a gateway city to<br />

Korea–a Japanese colony–and that is why Busan began to flourish during that time.<br />

In the early days of colonization, Japanese people built a new town around Yongdusan, where Waekwan<br />

was located. At the top of Yongdusan, Japanese people built the ‘Yongdusan Shrine ( )’ to worship<br />

their gods and turned the whole mountain into a sanctuary.<br />

Considering the fact Yongdusan was a guardian mountain ( ) of Busan overlooking the entire Busan<br />

port and the new town alongside the ocean and was located in the central part of the city, it can easily be<br />

guessed why Japanese people turned the mountain of Yongdusan into their sanctuary. Japanese people<br />

obviously wanted to tell Korean people that Busan is a sacred land of Japanese people that their gods look<br />

after the land.<br />

In the areas around Yongdusan, Japanese people built their malls and residential units. <strong>The</strong> areas include<br />

Daechung-dong to the north, Changsun-dong, Shinchang-dong, Bupyeong-dong, Bosoo-dong, Chochang-<br />

dong, Toseong-dong to the west, Gwangbok-dong, Nampo-dong to the south and Choongang-dong<br />

and Donggwang-dong to the east. Huge bustling new town areas located on the foot of mountains of<br />

Yongdusan and Bokbyeongsan fell into the hands of Japanese people and resembled Japanese territory.<br />

Japanese new towns and residential areas became the downtown in Busan and the streets around Japanese<br />

654


areas were well paved and clean, which was in sharp contrast to the residential areas for Korean people<br />

located in Yeongjoo-dong, Choryang-dong, Soojeong-dong and Beomil-dong. <strong>The</strong> so-called ‘downtown’<br />

in Busan was entirely owned by Japanese people during the Japanese rule.<br />

As the downtown in Busan was inhabited by Japanese people, Korean people had no other choice but to<br />

live on the outskirts of the city. <strong>The</strong> flatland in Choong-gu and Seo-gu used to be the downtown occupied<br />

by Japanese people while the small and crowed towns located on the slopes of the mountains were where<br />

Korean people were forced to live.<br />

Ami-dong, the village name that was written in Chinese character – Gokjeong ( ) – and read<br />

‘Danimachi,’ Boomin-dong and Namboomin-dong were the poor areas of the city where Korean<br />

people resided. Other Korean villages, located on the slope of the mountain in Dongdaeshin-dong and<br />

Seodaeshin-dong, were no different. All the Korean towns are in such dire condition.<br />

Considering such sharp contrast between the Japanese residential areas and the Korean residential areas<br />

during the Japanese colonization, it may be no exaggeration to say that Japanese people occupied the<br />

central part of Busan and forced Korean people to the outskirts of the city during the Japanese rule.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ethnic composition of residential areas in the city highlights the sad reality of the Japanese rule when<br />

the tyranny of oppressive rulers existed in the country. It also indirectly shows the plight of Korean people<br />

who barely survived under the colonial rule. That being said, Busan was a symbolic city showing the<br />

plight of Korean people during the Japanese colonial period.<br />

In this regard, again, Busan was placed at the forefront of Korean pre-modern history during the Japanese<br />

colonial period. <strong>The</strong> city is a representative example showing the harsh reality facing Korean people<br />

during the Japanese colonial period where they had to live on the outskirts of the city in their own country,<br />

as if they were living in someone else’s houses, while Japanese people were living a well off lifestyle on<br />

Korean land.<br />

6) Busan, a Port City and Pier City<br />

<strong>The</strong> status of Busan during the Japanese colonial period can be well illustrated with its title called the ‘port<br />

city’ or ‘pier city.’ As pointed out earlier, Busan has been boasting its status as a major port city of the<br />

country where ‘government ( ) ferries’ come and go.<br />

In addition to being the port for ferries, Busan was also the place where the ‘Gyeongbu (Seoul-Busan)<br />

655<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Railroad Line’ began. When I was in the elementary school, the school even taught us the song about<br />

Gyeongbu (Seoul-Busan) Railroad Line. <strong>The</strong> reason Gyeongbu (Seoul-Busan) Railroad Line is<br />

emphasized so much is that it was highly important for maintaining the status of Busan.<br />

In the early days of the Japanese colonial period from the 1930s to the 1940s, only a few Koreans – such<br />

as Korean students studying in Japan and those compulsory laborers who were forced to perform hard<br />

labor in Japan – were able to go aboard the ferries arriving on the #1 pier.<br />

Crying and looking back Busan port,<br />

there was a moonlight shining down on the railing of the ferry.<br />

Saying goodbye is sad<br />

Saying goodbye is depressing.<br />

This song is sung by Nam In-Soo in 1939 to describe the sorrow and struggle those laborers who were<br />

forced to go to Japan to perform hard labor through the compulsory manpower draft of the Japanese<br />

government.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n, there was another song about Busan introduced to Korea:<br />

Spring flowers bloom on Camellia Island,<br />

But seagulls at Busan port are still weeping for my brother,<br />

Whenever ferries come in and turn around right beside Oryukdo,<br />

I shout your name but there is no response.<br />

Please come back to Busan port, my dear brother.<br />

This song became very popular in 1975 when a large number of Korean compatriots in Japan visited their<br />

mother country Korea via the port city Busan.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was also another song about Busan:<br />

Coming back, coming back,<br />

To visit the mountains and rivers of my homeland,<br />

How much I missed the rose of Sharon,<br />

How much I yearned for the Taegeukgi (the national flag of Korea),<br />

Chatter seagulls, waves, please dance with me,<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is a ray of hope shining down on the head of the returning ship.<br />

656


As shown in the above lyrics of the songs about the city, Busan was welcoming the returning ships<br />

coming to Busan port amid much fanfare.<br />

Busan became a pioneer in Korean history during the period before and after Korea’s liberation from<br />

Japanese colonial rule. Compared with other cities in the country, Busan was the city that rode the great<br />

waves of change in Korean history. And Busan port was at the heart of the city.<br />

<strong>The</strong> pioneering spirit of the city reached its culmination during the Korean War. As an outpost of the<br />

South Korean forces, Busan ports – especially piers in the northern side of the city–played a strategically<br />

essential role in the battle against North Korean forces.<br />

During the Korean War, the UN forces – comprised of the forces of 16 countries such as the US, the UK,<br />

French, Canadian and Dutch forces – came and went from the #1 pier in Busan. Weapons and other war<br />

supplies were transferred to the #2, #3, #4 piers and to the central pier. As the logistics base and the rear<br />

base, Busan port contributed to the victory of the UN forces.<br />

I was working as an interpreter for the UN forces on the #2 pier during the Korean War. And one<br />

American General told me emphatically that “it would be impossible to win this war without these piers<br />

and ports in Busan.”<br />

What the American General told me still resonates with me today. At that time, the piers were full of<br />

laborers who worked around the clock to deliver the weapons, munitions and war supplies to the front<br />

lines of the war. On the center of the site where laborers worked on day and night shifts, 24 hours a day,<br />

that American General uttered such words.<br />

As the rear base, Busan port contributed significantly to the victory of the South Korean forces to end<br />

the tragic war on the Korean Peninsula. In this regard, Busan port is standing tall in the center of Korean<br />

history.<br />

7) ‘40 Stairs,’ Yeongsun Hill and the Hillside Shanty Town<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is the UN cemetery in Daeyeon-dong, Busan. <strong>The</strong> remains of 2,300 war dead from 11 countries<br />

are buried at the UN cemetery. This is why Busan became a place where people ruminated on the Korean<br />

War, which began on June 25th, 1950 and ended in July, 1953. Throughout the war, Busan was horribly<br />

ravaged and had to endure the harsh twists of the country’s history.<br />

657<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

As the sole logistics base in the rear, Busan was entrusted with tremendously important missions. At the<br />

same time, Busan served as the shelter and food source for refugees, displaced people and North Korean<br />

compatriots who defected from North Korea at that time. <strong>The</strong> currently widely-renowned port city ( )<br />

Busan was back then called ‘the shelter city Busan’ or ‘the interim capital city’ as the city was packed with<br />

refugees and displaced people whose number might surpass that of local residents.<br />

Notably, the area on the slope of Bokbyeongsan and around Yeongsun Hill was especially crowded with<br />

refugees and the ‘40 stairs’ were located at the heart of that region.<br />

A wanderer crying while sitting on the staircase of 40 stairs,<br />

Stop crying and tell me what is wrong,<br />

A refuge girl from Gyeonsang Province living in a shanty town<br />

felt sorry for him and asked what is wrong.<br />

A wanderer in this song refers to not just a wanderer, but a refugee who fled to Busan during the Korean<br />

War. He was one of 600,000 war refugees who fled to Busan where the number of local residents was<br />

only about 400,000. North Korean compatriots who defected from North Korea were also part of the war<br />

refugees who settled in the shelter city Busan.<br />

While most of the 600,000 war refugees were scattered across the city, an overwhelming majority of them<br />

settled in the area near Yeongsun Hill. Most war refugees were so poor and ragged and lived in crammed<br />

shanties and shacks – or the so-called ‘Hakobang.’ <strong>The</strong> shelter town for war refugees in the area near<br />

Yeongsun Hill was also called the ‘Hillside Shanty Town.’<br />

When you go up to the 40 stairs, you may see ‘Yeongsun Hill’ reaching to the south and north side and the<br />

‘Hillside Shanty Town’ was formed there along the ridges. A huge bunch of war refugees settled there in<br />

the ‘Hillside Shanty Town,’ which was like the country’s wounds left from the Korean War.<br />

Ever since the Joseon Dynasty, ‘Yeongsun Hill’ has served as a highly important passage way and a<br />

community of quite many people. For instance, when the high-level government official from Dongrae<br />

had to come to Busanpo to greet the Japanese envoys, they had to go through ‘Yeongsun Hill.’ <strong>The</strong> name<br />

‘Yeongsun’ was created in the late Joseon Dynasty. Ironically, ‘Yeongsun Hill’ or the important passage<br />

way for people with the 40 stairs in the middle became the ‘Hillside Shanty Town.’<br />

When you go down the 40 stairs and walk down the well-paved street in Choonang-dong, you may see the<br />

Busan train station and piers. In the areas near the Busan train station and piers, war refugees living in the<br />

658


shanty town scraped their living day by day and lived from hand to mouth. Milk powder porridge supplied<br />

by the US forces or by the relief organization was the only food available for them to alleviate their hunger<br />

and those war refugees had to be engaged in all kinds of hard labor to scratch a living. <strong>The</strong>y had to be<br />

engaged in extremely heavy labor at the train station, but the situation was even worse on the piers.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y had to sweat profusely to unload and deliver various war supplies from the huge freight vessel.<br />

Working as A-frame coolies and porters, they devoted themselves to the transportation of war supplies<br />

because they had no other choice if they wanted to make a living.<br />

Thus, those war refugees living in the ‘Hillside Shanty Town’ had to endure various hardships. While<br />

suffering from extreme poverty, they barely made a living day by day and had to go up and down the 40<br />

stairs as well as ‘Yeongsun Hill’ everyday to go home with difficulty and fatigue.<br />

<strong>The</strong> suffering those war refugees in Busan went through shows the pain and hardship the entire nation had<br />

to go through during the Korean War. It also shows the tragic history of Korea, which is presently divided<br />

into two countries. <strong>The</strong>refore, we can say that Busan – especially the area near the 40 stairs and the ‘Hillside<br />

Shanty Town’ – vividly shows the wounds or damage of inflicted on Korean people during the Korean<br />

War from 1950 to 1953. During this period, again, Busan acted as a pioneering city in the country that<br />

bore the brunt of the consequences of the brutal Korean War.<br />

8) Busan Portrayed in the Poem<br />

This is a gateway to this country<br />

Where the spirit of the country is well preserved,<br />

<strong>The</strong> range of mountains stretching from Baekdusan<br />

Reaches the Pacific Ocean and blends amazingly with the blue wave.<br />

<strong>The</strong> above is the first stanza of ‘the Song in Praise of Busan Tower’ written on the stone in front of Busan<br />

Tower in Yongdosan Park. ‘<strong>The</strong> Song in Praise of Busan Tower’ is a eulogy ( ) to Busan Tower and a<br />

paean ( ) devoted to the city of Busan.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is another poem devoted to the city of Busan:<br />

<strong>The</strong> blue horizon is much higher than the city ( ),<br />

And the wind blowing from metrological observatory around the hill flows to the northwestern<br />

side.<br />

659<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

<strong>The</strong> lonely steamship ( ) passes through the foreign land near the blackish tropic ( ).<br />

<strong>The</strong> dreaded empty desert ( ) surrounds the crystal color wind tunnel ( ).<br />

A small protrusion in the east and the fine fishing port ( ) in the south of the peninsula,<br />

the streets are desolate as in the daydream ( ) and like a big catch of fish from a distant cruise<br />

( ).<br />

Yoo Chi-Hwan portrayed the city of Busan like this in his poem ‘the Drawing of Busan ( )’ in 1939.<br />

<strong>The</strong> part describing the city “the blue horizon is much higher than the city ( )” captured my attention<br />

the most as it depicted the scenery of Busan where the horizons are seen from any part of the city’s<br />

mountain slopes and the horizon is so high that you would think that the sea looks up to the horizon.<br />

In 1947, Yoo Chi-Hwan again wrote the poem about the city of Busan under the same subject ‘the<br />

Drawing of Busan ( )’:<br />

Poplar trees on this hill cannot grow further because they reached the blue sky. This is the port near<br />

that hill.<br />

<strong>The</strong> remote region ( ) that is seen from far away appears like the horizontal line ( ).<br />

<strong>The</strong> view is tranquil and fine stars are twinkling.<br />

Riding the black wave swells like the mountains,<br />

<strong>The</strong> ships are resting at port and come and go again like the foals.<br />

<strong>The</strong> trees along the city streets where I walked on create shadows on the ground.<br />

<strong>The</strong> sea is shining like the silver light as they are washed by the vast ( ) sounds of the waves<br />

( ).<br />

Yoo Chi-Hwan wrote the poem about Busan as described above.<br />

<strong>The</strong> part “poplar trees on this hill cannot grow further because they reached the blue sky. This is the<br />

port near that hill” touched my heart as it delicately described the geographical location of Busan, a city<br />

surrounded by the mountains and overlooking the ocean. <strong>The</strong> mountains surrounding the city of Busan<br />

are relatively high compared with other mountains in cities. And the poem described the high-altitude<br />

mountainous terrain very well in the part “poplar trees on this hill cannot grow further because they<br />

reached the blue sky. This is the port near that hill.”<br />

660


While depicting the high hills and mountains in Busan in such a manner, the poem ‘the Drawing of Busan<br />

( )’ also described the scene of the waves rolling roar, the sounds of the waves ( ), the sea<br />

that is shining like the silver light as well as the topological location of Busan. <strong>The</strong> landscape of the high-<br />

altitude Mountains gives people a fresh feeling and inspiration while the vast sea opens out before people<br />

in Busan. It is the very city that is located in a propitious site of the country.<br />

9) Busan Presented in Korean Pop Song<br />

Busan is a port city filled with the songs and the sea in the city is always rising with the songs about it.<br />

<strong>The</strong> waves of the sea in Busan sing songs about the city sometimes in a quiet way other times in a more<br />

expressive way.<br />

How many K-pop songs ( ) about Busan are there? Perhaps, 40 or 50? If not, over 50 or 60? No. That<br />

is not the answer. <strong>The</strong>re are more than 100 songs about Busan in Korea. It is unthinkable for other cities in<br />

Korea to wish that as many as 100 songs would describe the city.<br />

<strong>The</strong> songs about Busan cover every corner of the city ranging from Haeundae Beach and Camellia Island<br />

to the east, Nakdong River to the west, the international market, Yeongdo, Yeongdo Bridge and Oryukdo<br />

to the south to Dongrae to the north of the city. <strong>The</strong> lyrics talked about the city’s sea, the new town and the<br />

streets in the city. Busan is literally the voice, K-pop music and the song.<br />

‘Busan chick’ is called and ‘Busan aunt’ hums a song while ‘Busan guy’ shouts and ‘Busan man’ mutters.<br />

It is like all the citizens of Busan sing together in chorus.<br />

Of many songs about Busan, the song of farewell – the song on goodbye- kept going round and round in<br />

my head.<br />

Crying and looking back Busan port,<br />

there was a moonlight shining down on the railing of the ferry.<br />

Saying goodbye is sad<br />

Saying goodbye is depressing.<br />

<strong>The</strong> above grief-song was sung by a man who was forced to go to Japan to perform hard labor through<br />

Japan’s conscription of mandatory manpower draft. Under the militaristic mandatory manpower draft<br />

( ), Japan forced Korean men to go to Japan to be engaged in severe manual labor during the colonial<br />

rule.<br />

661<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

I cried, shouted and struggled.<br />

Only a cold crescent moon is illuminated at Pusan port.<br />

Who am I looking for,<br />

Where should I go,<br />

I just cried, gripping the railing of the Yeongdo Bridge.<br />

In the song written above, ‘the Nostalgic Yeongdo Bridge’ is also crying for the goodbye. <strong>The</strong>re is another<br />

song that portrays the Yeongdo Bridge as the bridge of goodbye where people bid farewell to their loved<br />

one.<br />

I’m a trader in the international market.<br />

I miss you, Geum-soon.<br />

I miss my hometown.<br />

Over the railing of the Yeongdo Bridge,<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is only a lonely crescent moon above my head.<br />

Through the singer’s imaginative empathy with the crescent moon, the singer’s loneliness is seen through<br />

the lonely crescent moon in the song. This song was sung by a man who fled his hometown in the North<br />

to come to Busan in the South during the days of the 1.4 (January 4 th ) retreat.<br />

On January 4 th , 1951 while the Korean War was raging in earnest, the UN forces began to retreat from<br />

Heungnam Port in South Hamgyeong Province in the North. Along with the UN forces, as many as<br />

14,000 war refugees fled to the South on the US transport vessel – or the so-called LST. During the days<br />

of the 1.4 (January 4 th ) retreat, this man was forced to leave his lover in the North so he was weeping and<br />

singing about the grief of goodbye at the Yeongdo Bridge.<br />

As shown in the lyrics of the songs about the city, Busan served as the shelter for war refugees where they<br />

gathered together to survive and sustain their lives. <strong>The</strong>re was another song that appeared under such dire<br />

circumstances:<br />

I cried, shouted and struggled.<br />

Only a cold crescent moon is illuminated at Pusan port.<br />

Who am I looking for,<br />

Where should I go,<br />

I just cried, gripping the railing of the Yeongdo Bridge.<br />

662


This song was sung to war refugees and they all cried together. As described in the song above, more than<br />

600,000 war refugees continued to endure and suffer through the hardships in Busan - the shelter city and<br />

the city that was called the interim capital city of the country.<br />

Busan port is stained with the tears and pain of people saying goodbye to their loved ones. <strong>The</strong> situation<br />

was not much different at Busan train station:<br />

A light rain is drizzling down quietly.<br />

<strong>The</strong> sad Busan train station filled with people bidding farewell,<br />

Good bye and good bye.<br />

<strong>The</strong> whistle of the train is crying so hard.<br />

Refugees’ lives are full of hardship<br />

and still I don’t forget the shanty town there.<br />

A lady from Gyeongsang Province is crying so sadly.<br />

<strong>The</strong> sad Busan train station filled with people bid farewell.<br />

<strong>The</strong> song is about the period after brutal Korean War, which ended in 1953, when war refugees began to<br />

go back to Seoul during the days of the Korean Army’s recapturing of Seoul on Sep 28 th , 1950.<br />

In some cases, people who said goodbye to each other met eventually met again in Busan. In this sense,<br />

Busan was a place of reunion for them.<br />

Spring flowers bloom on Camellia Island,<br />

But seagulls at Busan port are still weeping for my brother,<br />

Whenever ferries come in and turn around right beside Oryukdo,<br />

I shout your name but there is no response.<br />

Please come back to Busan port, my dear brother.<br />

This is the song describing the period around the year 1975 when a number of Korean compatriots in<br />

Japan visited their motherland Korea. Having yearned for their returns, those Korean compatriots in Japan<br />

visited their native country via the port city Busan (To be more accurate, Busan port).<br />

<strong>The</strong> song shouts their long-cherished wish, ‘Come back to Busan Port’:<br />

Coming back, coming back,<br />

To visit the mountains and rivers of my homeland,<br />

How much I missed the rose of Sharon,<br />

663<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

How much I yearned for the Taegeukgi (the national flag of Korea),<br />

Chatter seagulls, waves, please dance with me,<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is a lay of hope shining down on the head of the returning ship.<br />

At last, Busan port was able to welcome the returning vessels. As people said goodbye to their loved ones<br />

to come to Busan and settled in the city to bond with the environments and people there, the city became<br />

their second home one day.<br />

Until one day the closed road is opened to my hometown,<br />

I may have to sell cigarettes here in the international market.<br />

Try living in Busan, you will soon feel so attached to the city<br />

And it will become your second hometown.<br />

A lady from Gyeongsang province is holding my hands.<br />

Busan, a city where people had to say goodbye to their loved ones and suffered from depression and<br />

loneliness, became a place of reunion and affection. Such a changing status and history of Busan is also<br />

well illustrated in the lyrics of K-pop songs.<br />

<strong>The</strong> pain of having to bid farewell to their loved ones and their reunion after liberation are all right there in<br />

the lyrics of K-pop songs. In addition to showing the history of Busan through the stories of people saying<br />

goodbye to their loved ones and their reunion, the lyrics of North Korean K-pop songs also talk about<br />

the lives of war refugees in Busan who fled their hometown to come to the city and the stories of their<br />

returning home during the days of the Korean Army’s recapturing of Seoul on Sep 28 th , 1950.<br />

K-pop songs about Busan show the pre-modern and modern history that this nation had to endure and go<br />

through. In this respect, it can be stated that Busan has been at the forefront of Korean history, standing<br />

tall as a major port city in Korea. <strong>The</strong> proud and unique status of Busan is well above other cities across<br />

the country in Korea.<br />

664


<strong>The</strong> Scars and Healing of the Korean War Refugees<br />

Chulwook Cha<br />

Pusan National University<br />

Introduction<br />

Many of the people living in Busan are linked to North Korean refugees. Busan was not a war hot spot.<br />

It was the provision capital, and a safe place. Near the end of the war, some of the refugees moved to<br />

Seoul or someplace near North Korea, but many settled down in Busan. Many success stories of North<br />

Korean refugees were told in the Busan International Fish Market. <strong>The</strong>ir will to survive was that strong. It<br />

excellently shows the efforts made by the refugees in Busan, where they had nowhere else to go.<br />

For me, the refugees were research subjects. <strong>The</strong>ir refugee experience, settling down in Busan, and their<br />

impact on today’s Busan, were all materials for analysis. Refugees were easily found near Danggam-<br />

dong, Ami-dong, Gamcheon-dong, Busan International Fish Market, and Uam-dong. As I gained interest<br />

in the refugees, I realized that people around me, including my colleagues and college friends knew many<br />

of them. <strong>The</strong>y easily introduced me to them. Refugees were that close to us. As I met them, my prejudice<br />

of seeing them only as research materials changed. I was amused and interested in their past, and they told<br />

me of their past sufferings in tears. I felt sorry and realized a different meaning of interviews.<br />

My research was still in preliminary stages. Research on refugees living close to the Northern border<br />

was showing some progress, 1 but I was not interested in refugees living in provision capital or around<br />

us. In Busan’s history, refugee related studies are limited to studies on the settling down of refugees.<br />

This is because refugees weren’t popular research subjects. It also means that there is a lack of effort<br />

and necessity in creating a social consensus on the experiences and scars of the refugees. Today, many<br />

1 Kim, Gwi-ok, Experiences and Identities of North Korean Defectors – Bottom up Research on the Defectors, Seoul National<br />

University Press, 2000.<br />

665<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

refugees have become old, and are passing away one by one. In order to understand today’s Busan, and to<br />

recreate and heal the refugees’ scars, a historical research must take place.<br />

My research on the refugees was a mere effort to know simple historical facts. <strong>The</strong> materials I collected<br />

also are limited. This paper also has a limit. I hope this paper sparks more studies on healing the scars of<br />

the refugees.<br />

1. Forced Evacuation and Abandoned People<br />

1) Sudden Refuge<br />

During the Korean War, individuals, rather than the state, had to look out for themselves. As of March<br />

1951, Seoul ranked first in terms of origin of refugees (165,878), Kyunggi Province (32,599) ranked<br />

second, followed by North Korea (33,891), Southern Kyungsang Province, and Kangwon Province. 2<br />

We can see that the whole country was filled with people fearing of the war. Among them, my research<br />

focuses on the refugees from North Korea. Among those who settled down in Busan, some had come<br />

to Seoul right after the liberation and then evacuated to Busan during the war, and some evacuated<br />

to Busan after the Jan. 4 th retreat. <strong>The</strong> latter divides into those who came directly to Busan, and those<br />

who settled down somewhere else first, and then had finally come to Busan. Many of the former case<br />

refugees were public servants or landlords during the Japanese colonial era. <strong>The</strong>se people were called<br />

‘rebels’ in the North Korean regime, and had to flee. In the beginning, most of them lived in Yong-<br />

san region’s Haebangchon. 3 After the Korean War broke out and the Chinese Communist Army took<br />

over Seoul, they moved once again because they thought that they could not survive under Communist<br />

Army rule.<br />

My focus is on the second case of refugees. During the Jan. 4th retreat, refuge began with retreating<br />

soldiers due to the intervention of the Communist Chinese army. According to my research, at the time,<br />

public servants, such as workers of the railway system evacuated. Also, there were vigilantes from the<br />

Korean and the UN troops’ occupied territory after the Sept. 28th recapturing of Seoul. However, most<br />

of the refugees fled because of the rumor that the ‘Chinese Communist army is flooding in from North.’<br />

Regardless of the refugees’ occupation or social status, the evacuation took place ‘suddenly.’ Moreover,<br />

2 So, Man-il, “Inflow of Refugees to Busan and Government Responds during the Korean War” Master’s thesis, Dong-a<br />

University Department of History, 2009, p. 53.<br />

3 Lee, Moon-Ung, “Research on the Formulation and Ecological Process of Islands-Looking at Haebangchon Yongsan-gu<br />

Seoul City” Seoul National University Department of Sociology, Master’s thesis, 1966.<br />

666


the refugees thought it was a ‘temporary’ fleeing, so they had to abide by the requests of the soldiers to<br />

evacuate.<br />

I just had to go because they said I had to go. I never thought of it as a refuge. People were saying<br />

that they were coming down from north. I asked them why, and the people were saying that<br />

the Chinese Communist army was coming. So people kept going. So I went down and down.<br />

(inaudible) Back then, you followed other people. You can’t decide the route, because you didn’t<br />

know the geography. So I kept going and going, and came all the way to Incheon (Shin, Ui-seop).<br />

<strong>The</strong> sudden evacuation tore families apart, and brought about economic difficulties to the refugees. No<br />

matter who you were, a vigilante or a person swept up by the army’s retreat, you had to go to a safer place.<br />

<strong>The</strong> refugees came only with the family members they were with at the moment of evacuation. Other<br />

family members were lost. Yim, Soon-hee had to flee when her father was away on a business trip. Mr.<br />

Cha fled to find his parents and siblings. Lee, Gi-hwal had to flee on his way to meet his father, who was a<br />

vigilante. All of the refugees that I interviewed stressed that their evacuation happened out of the blue. All<br />

of them didn’t know that the evacuation will be prolonged. <strong>The</strong>ir priority was to be safe. <strong>The</strong>y all thought<br />

that they would be with their families soon. Many of the refugees were only with one or two of their<br />

family members because of the sudden evacuation. Lee, Gi-hwal’s experience of the evacuation moment<br />

is as follows.<br />

My father became a vigilante after the Korean army came. In my neighborhood, soldiers fought<br />

from dawn till dusk, and the Chinese Communist soldiers finally fled at night. <strong>The</strong> next day, I went<br />

to the tochka, and there were so many shell casings. Ten or more guns were thrown away. We gave<br />

them to our neighbors. <strong>The</strong> vigilantes stuck knives in front of their guns. When I came back home,<br />

my mother told me to find my father at the townhouse. On the way to the townhouse, people were<br />

in a frenzy. <strong>The</strong>re were no vigilantes at the townhouse. People were running out from the newly<br />

built roads. I was fifteen at the time. I didn’t go back home. I was swept up by the running crowd.<br />

<strong>The</strong> sun set, and I climbed over a mountain and realized that I was in a place called Parkchun, 50 li<br />

(around 25 kilometers) away from home.<br />

This is a testimony made by Lee, Gi-hwal. He is from Nam-meon, Taecheon-gun, in Northern Pyungan<br />

Province. His father was a vigilante. He was swept up by the fleeing crowd at the age of fifteen, on his<br />

way to find his father. After then, he never reunited with his mother. Like this case, many of the refugees<br />

did not know why they were fleeing. Most of them were alone, swept up by the crowd.<br />

Because it was so sudden, many of the refugees weren’t prepared to sustain their living. Some were<br />

667<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

fortunate to only walk short distances. However, others had to walk for days or months. <strong>The</strong>y couldn’t<br />

keep much on them. <strong>The</strong>y had to find food every day. During my research, I found out that some refugees<br />

from North Korea brought with them small and valuable assets, such as gold. According to Kim, Jin-sang,<br />

a realtor in the Busan International Fish Market during the war, some refugees paid in gold to buy good<br />

places for their shops. It didn’t happen often, but it is easy to assume that many refugees brought portable<br />

valuables. However, most of the refugees didn’t get to bring valuables. <strong>The</strong>y had to sell the clothes on<br />

their backs to buy food. 4<br />

However, during the evacuation, many realized that their evacuation was not ‘temporary.’ In Hamgyung<br />

Province, most of the refugees used LSTs or private boats. People from Pyungan Province and Hwanghae<br />

Province walked, or if there were railway officers in the village, they took trains. Moving by ship did not<br />

automatically mean safety. Families were separated on different boats. A family was separated because the<br />

boat that his wife and children were on couldn’t sail due to bad weather. 5 Others on foot had to watch their<br />

friends die. <strong>The</strong>y went on south not eating or sleeping.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re were several routes that the hurried refugees took in coming to Busan. First is coming directly to<br />

Busan from North Korea during the Jan 4 th retreat. Second is going westward first to Gunsan or Incheon<br />

during the Jan 4 th retreat, and then coming to Busan around liberation. Third, refugees from Hamkyung<br />

province were separated to East Sea coastal cities, such as Ulsan, or to Geoje Island. After the cease—<br />

fire, they moved to Busan due to shortage of government food relief and deteriorating living conditions.<br />

However, these were not the only routes. <strong>The</strong>re were other routes that the refugees took in coming to<br />

Busan.<br />

2) Difficulties in Earning Citizenship<br />

<strong>The</strong> refugees were not allowed to settle down in Busan automatically due to government inflow<br />

restrictions. <strong>The</strong> government’s official reason was to prevent any social issues arising from the sudden<br />

inflow of people to Busan. <strong>The</strong>re was also the fear that unverified people might threaten the government. 6<br />

Despite the sudden evacuation, the refugees had to undergo ideology verification. <strong>The</strong>re is a lot of<br />

4 Kwon, Jeong-rim tells that after fleeing to Daejeon, they had to sell the clothes on their backs for food, because they didn’t<br />

have anything. Many refugees had to sell anything of value not to starve.<br />

5 Kim, Jong-gun, “<strong>The</strong> Truth of the Trauma of Division Seen Through Interviews,” <strong>The</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> for Unification 51,<br />

2011, pp. 53-57.<br />

6 Cha, Chul-wook; Ryu, Ji-seok; Son, Eun-ha, “Migration and Living Space of the Refugees in Busan during the Korean<br />

War”, Collection on Korean Culture (Minjokmunhwa nonchong) 45, 2010, pp. 255-259.<br />

668


evidence pointing to the fact that many refugees who came to Busan were held in prison camps, screened<br />

on whether they were members of the North Korean Labor Party. Kim Duk-sung remembers being<br />

screened at Dongrae prison camp. Another more indirect method of ideology evaluation was joining the<br />

army. Park, Young-ae’s husband was a vigilante back home. He voluntarily joined the army after coming<br />

to South Korea because he believed that he had to show his will to ‘crush North Korea’ to become a<br />

South Korean citizen. All enlisting refugees had similar reasons. Lee, Gi-hwal worked the fatigue duty in<br />

the army. He says that other soldiers called him a commie and beat him because of his short hair, so he<br />

worked harder than anyone else.<br />

Yes, my mother was quiet small but courageous. When we were evacuating after the Korean War<br />

broke out, my mother slipped and fell while crossing the frozen Daedong River, and her arm broke.<br />

So I found a handcart, put her on the cart and continued our journey. We walked all the way to<br />

the Seodaemun Police Station. It took us a long time. It took us 29 days to come to Seodaemun<br />

Police Station. When we arrived, we saw that they were sending all young men away to the army.<br />

My father made one mistake. We had quite a lot of North Korean money. We should have left the<br />

money back home, but my father hid the money in three pillows. So we were being investigated at<br />

the Seodaemun Police Station, and they asked us what those pillows were. <strong>The</strong> policeman heard a<br />

crackling noise, and told other officers to cut open the pillow. Commie’s money spilled out of the<br />

pillow. <strong>The</strong> policemen reported it to their superiors, and they said to shoot us all unconditionally<br />

because we were all commies. <strong>The</strong> young men were sent to the army, and the rest were executed.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re were two older sisters-in-law, my mother, my father, and my older brother. My older brother<br />

was old. More than fifty, nearly sixty-years-old. <strong>The</strong>y put us in a cell underground and said that<br />

they were going to execute us. Because it was during a war, society had become lawless. So when<br />

they said that they were going to shoot us, they shot us. So I saw my family being dragged away.<br />

And I was sent to Inchon at night. After that, I rode the LSD to Jeju Island.<br />

This is the unbelievable story of Hwang, Jong-yeop. Because of their North Korean money, they were<br />

framed as commies. Adults were executed and he was sent away to the army. He tried to look for his<br />

parents afterwards, but did not find them. So he believes that they were executed back then. In order to<br />

prove that he wasn’t a commie, he voluntarily joined the U.S. army and the guerrilla unit after deserting<br />

the army he was forced to join. He worked so hard to prove his innocence.<br />

Regardless of his will, he was forced to flee from home, separated from his family, and received ideology<br />

screening according to national standards. It wasn’t his will to evacuate, but the process, settling down,<br />

and all of the responsibilities to pass the screening and to become a South Korean citizen were up to him.<br />

<strong>The</strong> refugees accepted that fact. <strong>The</strong>y blamed themselves for their separation, the refuge, and their poverty.<br />

669<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

2. Forgetting the Refuge and Settling Down in Busan as a Replacement<br />

<strong>The</strong> purpose of healing historical traumas is to heal or alleviate social illness to create a healthier society.<br />

Many researchers mention oblivion as a method of healing. Yoo, Jae-chun cites Nietz and stresses that<br />

“For us to lead a healthier life, we need to know how to forget as well as remember.” It is said that for a<br />

human being or an ethnic group to sustain their healthiness, they must have the capability to heal their<br />

wound, replace the loss, and to reproduce the broken parts. 7 <strong>The</strong>refore, they need something to replace<br />

the loss to heal. And it is though this that they forgot their memories. 8 <strong>The</strong> wounds that the North Korean<br />

refugees bear must go through a healing process of their own. However, it can also be healed through their<br />

resilience to replace their loss or the energy to recover. We will now look at how the refugees self-healed<br />

their wounds. 9<br />

<strong>The</strong> refugees had to live on with unbearable memories. <strong>The</strong> energy that helped them live was oblivion and<br />

adaptation. <strong>The</strong> hurt that they felt during evacuation did not stand out because of the circumstances they<br />

had to face while settling down in Busan. <strong>The</strong>y had to find a home and to live. That helped the refugees<br />

from remembering. After the cease fire, they realized that they could not go home and reunite with their<br />

loved ones. That resignation was also a method of forgetting. It was the settling down that allowed them to<br />

forget and to resign. <strong>The</strong>re were diverse means to settling down in Busan. Some got married and created<br />

a family. Others found jobs to make a living, or made friends and formed relationships. Of course, these<br />

were only temporary reliefs. When the effects wore off, the horrible memories came back.<br />

<strong>The</strong> refugees themselves stress that marriage was a form of resignation and oblivion. Of the refugees in<br />

their seventies that I could meet today, most of them got married in Busan before or after evacuation. To<br />

the refugees, their partners were the separated families, homes, and the people to share their everyday<br />

sufferings.<br />

Most of the refugees married other North Korean refugees. <strong>The</strong>y did so because they had hope that one<br />

day, when the war is over, they could go back home. <strong>The</strong>y were away from home, but to them, their<br />

partners were like home. To the North Korean men, the North Korean food that their wives made, such as<br />

7 Yoo, Jae-chun, “<strong>The</strong> Role of Historical Studies in <strong>Humanities</strong> Treatment Studies – the Case of the Efficacy of History and<br />

the Issue of Healing Perception Conflicts,” <strong>Humanities</strong> and Science Journal 26, 2010, p. 501.<br />

8 According to the parties in need of oblivion (the victim and the perpetrator), it can heal wounds, and sometimes, it can act<br />

as a stimulus that worsens the wound.<br />

9 This is to distinguish the healing process between the self-effort to heal and healing with outside help. This chapter is<br />

about the former, and the latter will be discussed in the next chapter to see whether the wounds of the refugees can be<br />

healed through external relations.<br />

670


Bindaedduck and mandu, helped to forget the longing for their mothers.<br />

Lee, Gi-hwal married a refugee from Kangwon Province. She had lost her parents during the war. When<br />

Lee cried on national holidays thinking of his mother, his wife, who was enduring a much bigger wound,<br />

would console him. His wife’s consolation was the biggest source of comfort that helped him bear<br />

through his difficulties. Fortunately, his wife earned money with him, so they were able to put food on<br />

the table every day, and that also made him happy. His wife had stored the clothes that he wore during the<br />

evacuation, which was handmade by his mother. To him, his wife was a person to share and empathize<br />

with his wounds.<br />

However, those replacements were like opium. It helped you forget the immediate pain, but it wasn’t a<br />

cure. Hwang, Jong-yeop who was framed as a commie for having North Korean money at the Seodaemun<br />

Police Station came to Busan, and got a job at an iron bar factory. He remembers that the happiest time of<br />

his life was when he met his wife through a friend and got married at the factory. He was so happy that he<br />

forgot his past sufferings. However, after his wife passed away, all of the pain came back. <strong>The</strong> thought of<br />

his hometown, parents, and siblings made him lonely.<br />

Frankly speaking, I am too old to say this, but I am so very lonely. I sleep alone, and I wake up<br />

alone. I constantly think of my hometown, my parents, and my brothers and sisters. I can never<br />

forget them. After my wife passed away, I have no one to turn to. Of course I have my children,<br />

but they are all grown up and living independently. So I can’t turn to them now. <strong>The</strong> loneliness just<br />

follows me around all the time (Hwang, Jong-yeop).<br />

<strong>The</strong> pains that he had forgotten due to his marriage were creeping up on him again after her death. From<br />

this, we can tell how much his wife had meant to him. In other words, his wife’s presence had helped him<br />

forget the war’s scars.<br />

Other than getting married and creating a family, the diverse human connection, such as neighbors,<br />

colleagues, and hometown friends all became opportunities to share their emotions. <strong>The</strong> attachment to the<br />

place where these relationships were forged also became opportunities to forget. During the research, I<br />

found out that there were a lot of small gatherings (kye: a kind of traditional private fund, whose members<br />

chip in a modest amount of money to create a fund for later use). Among the gatherings, there were those<br />

who went to the meetings to meet North Koreans and share their sentiments. Others were those who<br />

placed more importance in the new relationships they forged while settling down in Busan. <strong>The</strong> former<br />

gatherings include Yibukdominhoe (North Koreans’ Association). Lee, Gi-hwal started to attend the<br />

Association’s meetings in his thirties. He says that meeting North Koreans and speaking in North Korean<br />

671<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

dialect helped him lessen his yearning.<br />

My research found that the refugees went to many meetings with the people they met in their<br />

neighborhoods while settling down in Busan. In particular, there is a gathering in the Refugee Village in<br />

Uam-dong, Nam-ku. <strong>The</strong> gathering has been ongoing for more than 40 years, 10 and more than 60% of its<br />

members are North Korean refugees. As time passed, different people came to the meetings. <strong>The</strong> meeting<br />

could last so long because people came to the meeting to share their daily lives and to post job offers. In<br />

Danggam-dong, there is a hometowners’ gathering, like the ‘Shinmak-kye’ made by people from Shinmak<br />

region in Hwanghae Province. However, most of the gatherings in Danggam-dong centered on those who<br />

lived in the neighborhood. Most of the gatherings held regular meetings and parties, and when there is a<br />

family event, the meeting gave gift money. It was very important for the refugees because most of them<br />

didn’t have many family members. <strong>The</strong> gatherings were the place to forget their loneliness.<br />

<strong>The</strong> relationships the refugees forged while settling down were the replacements for the connections they<br />

lost during the war and the evacuation. <strong>The</strong> awareness that they were all refugees and the relationship with<br />

their neighbors all helped to self-heal their wound. However, the permanency of the oblivion made by<br />

replacements and the conclusive effect of it in the healing process needs further research.<br />

Another replacement that stands out during settling down in Busan is economic activity. Lee, Gi-hwal’s<br />

wife said that she was “happy that I was married and had food on the table.” This shows that earning a<br />

living was an important factor in forgetting pain. Among the interviewees, it was clear that the current<br />

economic situation intervened in conjuring up past memories. Even though they led a happy life with<br />

many friends and were successful in terms of money, if they were in economic difficulties now, they were<br />

reliving their past sufferings. <strong>The</strong>re is a difference between the refugees living in Danggam Market area<br />

and Busan International Fish Market area. <strong>The</strong> former are in somewhat difficult situations now, and the<br />

latter have achieved some success in the market. <strong>The</strong> two groups remember their pasts differently. It is<br />

because the people living in difficulty think that their past sufferings are the reason for their instability<br />

today.<br />

Vendors at big marketplaces such as the Busan International Fish Market or Busan Market remember<br />

10 Testimony by Kim, Young-ja (female, 76 years old, from Chungjin, Northern Hamkyung Province, recorded on Feb.<br />

Testimony by Kim, Young-ja (female, 76 years old, from Chungjin, Northern Hamkyung Province, recorded on Feb.<br />

26 th , 2012). This gathering takes place every fourth Sunday at lunch at a restaurant near Jasungdae. <strong>The</strong> members of the<br />

gathering used to live in one village. Now some of them have moved to other communities. I attended their meeting and<br />

observed. <strong>The</strong>y spend a couple of hours conversing about daily lives and family issues and they part. <strong>The</strong> participation<br />

rate is quite high. Even people who had to go to church tried hard to attend.<br />

672


earning money as a very pleasant memory. Lee, Gi-hwal, who was separated from his mother, looked<br />

as if he had forgotten all of his sorrow while speaking about his experiences as a vegetable vendor, ice<br />

flake vendor, and managing a manufacturing business. It seems that earning a lot of money was replacing<br />

the loss. However, Park, Young-ae’s husband works in Danggam-dong. He worked in the back office of<br />

Poongsan Metal. He earned bigger paychecks than others. He led a satisfactory life, leading the company’s<br />

volleyball team. However, after retirement, his business failed and the economic hardships conjured up<br />

his past sufferings. It is from here that we can see that the current situation plays a big role in whether the<br />

wound of evacuation can be replaced or not. Also, we can see that healing a refugee’s wound must not be<br />

done in an individual level, but a societal level.<br />

Family, houses, relationships with people around them, new friendships, and economic stability all<br />

became opportunities to become attached to the area the refugees lived in. 11 <strong>The</strong>re are a lot of refugees<br />

who think Busan as their base, and are attached to it. <strong>The</strong> attachment and settling down could also be<br />

another replacement for healing the refugees’ wounds.<br />

3. Refugees and Researcher: Sympathy and Limit<br />

Yoo, Jae-chun proposed the recreation of the trauma and the process of sympathizing-healing-historicizing<br />

as a method to heal historical traumas. 12 He also proposed talking as a method of recreation and sympathy.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, he stressed that the roles of historians and the oral statements are very important. Through<br />

oral statements, history of an individual or a group that isn’t recorded in the documents can be restored.<br />

This can be the beginning of healing an individual or a group’s scar. 13 <strong>The</strong>refore, healing the scars of<br />

Korean War refugees can also be done through this process. Some people argue that oral statement is a<br />

method of cultural healing. <strong>The</strong>y explain that human beings show their desires through words, and that<br />

their emotions are relieved through words, so that it can heal wounds. While talking, the interviewee and<br />

the researcher get to share their emotions. Also, the interviewee shows his/her emotions, so it is said to<br />

have a healing effect. However, even though making oral statements is effective, there isn’t any academic<br />

research on it. 14<br />

11 Cha, Chul-wook; Kong, Yoon-kyung, ”<strong>The</strong> Settlement and Placeness of North Korea Refugees for the Korean War,”<br />

Cha, Chul-wook; Kong, Yoon-kyung, ”<strong>The</strong> Settlement and Placeness of North Korea Refugees for the Korean War,”<br />

Journal of Sokdang Academic Research of Traditional Culture 47, 2010, pp. 293-298.<br />

12 Yoo, Jae-chun, op. cit., pp. 508-509.<br />

Yoo, Jae-chun, op. cit., pp. 508-509.<br />

13 Kim, Ho-yeon; Um, Chan-ho, “Seeking <strong>Humanities</strong> Treatment Using Oral History,”<br />

Kim, Ho-yeon; Um, Chan-ho, “Seeking <strong>Humanities</strong> Treatment Using Oral History,” <strong>Humanities</strong> and Science Journal,<br />

24, 2010, p. 369.<br />

14 Yoon, Taek-lim, ”Oral History Interview and Historical Trauma: Possibility for Combining the Task of Seeking Truths<br />

Yoon, Taek-lim, ”Oral History Interview and Historical Trauma: Possibility for Combining the Task of Seeking Truths<br />

with Healing Historical Wounds,” <strong>Humanities</strong> and Science Journal, 30, 2011, p. 400.<br />

673<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Interviewee and researcher relations are different from forming relations with friends or spouses. Of<br />

course this process can be understood as a socialization of an individual’s memory, but forming a sense<br />

of empathy takes more time. <strong>The</strong> socialization that takes place here is the relationship among people who<br />

live in a same place, like family. Among the people in the relationships, some might not have experienced<br />

the same traumatic events, but these relationships can help them forget and replace their scars. <strong>The</strong>ir<br />

empathetic bond isn’t directly linked to the scars of the Korean War. A bigger bond comes from their daily<br />

lives that they share with their families or neighbors. However, a relationship between an interviewee<br />

and a researcher is somewhat different. <strong>The</strong> key point is whether they can form a bond and share their<br />

feelings in a short period of time. It is inevitable that there isn’t enough time to form a bond. However, the<br />

interviewee realizes that he/she can earn something different from the researcher that he/she can’t get from<br />

his/her family or friends. <strong>The</strong> interviewee expects that a social consensus will be formed about what they<br />

have experienced, and that it goes beyond just being an individual’s experience to become recognized<br />

as official history. This expectation helps to overcome the limitations in forming a bond between an<br />

interviewee and a researcher. This paper will also look into the efforts that have been taken to form social<br />

bonds with the refugees.<br />

In a conversation with an interviewee with historical scars, historical researchers emphasize that their scars<br />

are not caused by individual reasons, but a historical and a social one. In fact, based on my experience,<br />

overall, interviews with the refugees went smoothly. <strong>The</strong>y easily agree to the researcher’s persuasion that<br />

they are important parts of Busan’s history and that their lives and history must be organized. During their<br />

evacuation, living as refugees, and while settling down, the refugees have never thought of themselves<br />

as the main characters in history. Or, they might have thought that what they have been through was<br />

important, but because no one recognized them, they never had the chance to speak. But a researcher<br />

gives them the chance to speak. This is why refugees and researchers form bonds easily.<br />

Interviewees commonly say that they have never told the process of evacuation and their lives in detail as<br />

they do during the interview. <strong>The</strong>y have never told their stories in detail to their families or friends. Only<br />

relevant parts were told in pieces. It seemed that the interviewees gained trust in the researcher because<br />

the researcher listened to their stories, which did not receive much attention by others. However, the<br />

content that they told the researcher was limited. <strong>The</strong> interviewees emphasized the process of evacuation.<br />

How many days they have walked, how they evaded bombings, how they survived while others died,<br />

and other facts to emphasize that they were the survivors. In these stories, they are proud that they have<br />

accomplished something great. Also, they are proud of earning money in Busan. It almost feels as if they<br />

are telling a story of a mythical victory when they say that they created their lives from scratch. On the<br />

other hand, what the interviewees do not like to talk about is their failures. From this, we can tell that<br />

they forgot their pains by remembering victories instead of scars. Stories filled with sorrow, buried deep<br />

674


in their hearts, were also not told easily. Stories about their families, ideologies, and brutal lives needed<br />

more trust to be built between the researcher and the interviewee. <strong>The</strong>re were some interviewees who<br />

told their stories in tears. Kim, Jung-sook is not a North Korean refugee, but she came to live in Ami-<br />

dong during the Korean War. She showed tears saying that she suffered because her husband was addicted<br />

to gambling, and that it was her fault that her children had the same blood as her husband, and was also<br />

addicted to gambling. I confirmed that a researcher was meaningful as a listener and a person to empathize<br />

with. Refugees thought that the pain that they experienced were their entire faults. It is up to the researcher<br />

to understand their pain at a social and national level, not an individual level. This is the process of<br />

historicizing, and that process will be helpful in healing the refugees’ traumas.<br />

<strong>The</strong> biggest pains for the refugees are related to the family members they left back in North Korea. <strong>The</strong><br />

personal guilt that only they evacuated and that their family members didn’t remains as the bigger scar.<br />

Lee Gi-hwal, who I mentioned before, was born in 1936, in Taechon, Northern Pyungan Province. He<br />

met his father by chance during the Jan. 4 th retreat while evacuating alone, but he never reunited with his<br />

mother. <strong>The</strong> pain of refuge life was more than words can say, but every national holiday, the memories<br />

of his mother made his heart sick. His wife understood his pain, and stored the clothes that he wore while<br />

evacuating, which his mother made herself, even till this day. <strong>The</strong> clothes were donated and are shown in<br />

the Provision Capital Memorial Hall in Busan, which opened in September 20 th , 2012. Lee feels relieved<br />

that his experience has gone beyond an individual level to a level that can form a social consensus.<br />

<strong>The</strong>ir scars will be healed when not only the researcher, but also the nation, which is responsible for the<br />

war, understand the refugees’ lives and create a bigger social consensus.<br />

Conclusion<br />

<strong>The</strong> Korean War that began sixty years ago is still ongoing. <strong>The</strong> divided nations seem far away from<br />

reuniting, and the silent, deep sorrow of the people who sacrificed due to their nation’s violence is also<br />

still ongoing. <strong>The</strong> refugees who were separated from their family and evacuated from their homes are not<br />

hoping. <strong>The</strong>y are giving up.<br />

This paper is about the possibility of healing the scars of the Korean War refugees. I have not done<br />

research on the actual healing of the refugees’ scars. So I hope this paper shows the need to heal the<br />

refugees’ scars, and works as its starting point. <strong>The</strong>re are still many refugees living in Busan. However,<br />

there aren’t any proper efforts to historicize their experiences. <strong>The</strong>re are so few references about the<br />

refugees. Without their oral statements, it will not be easy to fill in the important gap in our history. What<br />

675<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

is hopeful is that recently, intermittent research and analysis are taking place.<br />

Recently, the Provision Capital Memorial Hall was reopened as a Korean War Museum. It is special in the<br />

sense that prior museums showed experiences of a nation undergoing war, but this museum emphasizes<br />

the lives of the refugees during wartime. Researchers and public entities must become the medium where<br />

they can create a social consensus about the refugees’ experiences. <strong>The</strong> sufferings must not disappear,<br />

untold in the refugees’ hearts. <strong>The</strong>y must be evaluated as events that we all empathize. Researchers must<br />

prove that the refugees’ experiences are not meaningless, but that they hold historical importance and<br />

value. <strong>The</strong>refore, the history created from these experiences must be taught and celebrated. And we need<br />

to begin creating a celebrated culture through museums.<br />

676


Sansoo Lee Jong-Ryul’s National History:<br />

<strong>The</strong> Scars of Wounds and the Current History<br />

Man-joon Park<br />

Dongeui University<br />

1. Introduction<br />

What does the past do for us? Is history referring to the narrative formulated to reproduce the stories of the<br />

past in the order of time? <strong>The</strong> answer is no. History is not a mere reproduction of memories of people, yet<br />

history is something that determines the reason for our being, our lives, our identity as well as the direction<br />

of our lives. This paper is written based on the premise that history has a unique status and is something<br />

that determines the reason for our being, our lives, our identity as well as the direction of our lives, rather<br />

than the mere reproduction of memories of people about the past.<br />

It is not difficult to ascertain such a status of history. Why did the Chinese government come up with<br />

the Dongbei Project 1 (China’s history falsification project for the history of the Koguryo Empire, which<br />

has the root of Korea’s present identity and legitimacy)? Simply put, it is like declaring war over the<br />

possession of memories about the past. Although it is not a war that is fought with guns and other weapons,<br />

it is a diplomatic war claiming the territorial rights over a certain piece of territory. From the Chinese<br />

government’s perspective, it is a project to establish a uniform multi-ethnic nation theory to stabilize the<br />

Northeast Asian region and build a strong historical identity of the country. If you look into the details of<br />

the project, however, the Chinese government is obviously trying to falsify the history of the Northeast<br />

Asian region in a biased and opinionated way.<br />

1 Dongbei Project refers to the research project of the Borderland History and Geography Research Institute (<br />

) under the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences on history conducted for five years since 2002. Dong-Book-<br />

Gong-Jeong is short for the research project on the history and current situation of the Northeast Asian region (<br />

).<br />

677<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

<strong>The</strong> ongoing dispute over territorial rights between South Korea, Japan, China and Russia is centered<br />

on the same perception of history. Why is the dispute over territorial rights the same as the dispute over<br />

history? <strong>The</strong> two disputes are the same in the sense that both are forcing the wrong ‘outside’ understanding<br />

of history and of our memories of the past. In addition, the two disputes are the same in the sense that they<br />

both are trying to destroy the ‘inner’ order of our memories of the past. <strong>The</strong> dispute over territorial rights<br />

and the dispute over history have the same background and same intention. <strong>The</strong>y are constantly trying to<br />

falsify the history of our society and our lives. In other words, they are not merely attempting to formulate<br />

the narrative of the stories of the past. <strong>The</strong> memories of the past and the truth about the past still have<br />

historical value and significance in today’s world. To people of today, history is another name for ‘truth,<br />

justice and the future outlook.’ As we were not able to heal the scars of the past, correcting the history of<br />

the country is all the more important. Now, we get a clearer picture of the problem and have all the reasons<br />

to correct our history.<br />

<strong>The</strong> world has increasingly become globalized and smaller day by day. How close did the regions,<br />

countries and ethnic groups get? As the world has become smaller through globalization, it may be natural<br />

to think that the regions, countries and ethnic groups may have gotten closer and closer. However, that<br />

is not the case. If you look beneath the surface of those relationships, ‘exotic things (foreign and strange<br />

things)’ and ‘indigenous things’ and have simply coexisted while ‘imperialism’ and ‘national legitimacy’<br />

have been mixed in a globalized world. Such a coexistence of conflicting elements resulted in a variety<br />

of hybrid cultures, changing the landscape of power and authority. That is why there have been strong<br />

‘resistance’ and ‘merger’ movements throughout history. <strong>The</strong> ‘beautifully (?)’ conjured slogan ‘the most<br />

localized thing is the most globalized thing’ is created against such a background.<br />

What matters here is a balance of power. Facing the ‘globally’-powerful movement to constantly reproduce<br />

similar memories of the past in a systematic manner and to transform everything in the region, how<br />

should we make resistance movements to leave our trace in history? <strong>The</strong> global movement to reproduce<br />

history is so strong that it surpasses the special limitations and ethnic nature of people. Diverse opinions<br />

on the interpretation of globalism conflict with each other in this region. South Korea is no exception. We<br />

cannot turn a blind eye to the concept of nation and our national identity that is about to collapse due to<br />

globalization.<br />

I’m not saying that we have to look for ways to look into and analyze the multilayered structure of<br />

historical perception. What I’m arguing is that we have to pay attention to the weakened national identity<br />

that is losing its cohesive force as a historical theory.<br />

It is the eyes or the perception that are ‘paying attention’ to something. When we see and perceive<br />

678


something, ‘seeing’ and ‘knowing’ is the essence. <strong>The</strong>refore, the problem is not the past itself, but our<br />

perception of the past. History is ‘history’ that is essentially perceived, which is again allowing us to draw<br />

a clearer picture of the problem. We are not taking issue with the subjective composition of narrative in<br />

history. What we are emphasizing is different from this.<br />

First, it is urgent to free us from the arbitrary order that manipulates our past events that have no inherent<br />

relationship. Freeing us from such an arbitrary order is called ‘liberation.’ What we need is the attitude to<br />

take the initiative to re-draw our history and autonomously take lessons from historical time.<br />

Not all past events are absorbed into the uniform name of history. Our historical sketch of the past is largely<br />

based on the current view of our identity and thus is bound to be different depending on the current view of<br />

identity.<br />

True, our past events are reproduced not merely based on memories and awareness. Reproduction of the<br />

past is the realistic process of interpreting situations that are inherited from the past. In that sense, historical<br />

time is current and practical, which makes it differentiated from ‘natural time.’ From the perspective<br />

of ‘natural time,’ all regions across the world are in the same order of time. However, historical time is<br />

different. It flows along the horizon of practical time. Natural time flows regardless of history whereas<br />

historical time stops when the practical time is put to a halt. That is the reason that we cannot talk about<br />

the past without having a clear outlook for the future. <strong>The</strong> mere reproduction of past events is distinct<br />

from building a ‘historical’ understanding of the past and putting the historical perception into practice.<br />

Based on the premise and a critical awareness of the problems we have, this paper is to examine the history<br />

associated with Sansoo ( ) Lee Jong-Ryul ( , 1902-1989), a national historic man ( ) of<br />

Korea and to explore Busan’s scars of wounds from the past and the future outlook for healing such scars.<br />

2. Why Lee Jong-Ryul?<br />

<strong>The</strong> reproduction of the past events of Busan becomes very specific when it is associated with the special<br />

nature of Busan. Busan was a symbolic space connecting us to the historical perception, and we store<br />

numerous historical experiences and knowledge and call up and disseminate them whenever the need<br />

arises.<br />

Busan port is a symbol of the port city Busan. Busan port has a long and proud history that is said to have<br />

been the most flourishing port in the Northeast Asian countries of South Korea to China, Japan. In addition,<br />

the diplomatic relations of the Joseon Dynasty were centered on Waegwan (Japanese trading and living<br />

quarters in Korea), especially Waegwans in Busan. Back then, Busan was a beachhead for establishing<br />

679<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

and maintaining diplomatic relations with Japan. Economically, Busan was also a hub for merchant trade<br />

between Korea and China and between Korea and Japan, 2 and its trade surplus was high enough to cover<br />

the total government expenditure of the Joseon Dynasty and to provide enormous boost to the domestic<br />

economy. 3<br />

Busan had to endure and go through hardships and difficulties due to its reputation as a major port city<br />

in Korea. During the Japanese invasion of Korea in 1592, which was understood as an international<br />

war involving three Northeastern Asian countries of Korea, Japan and China, Busan had to suffer from<br />

hardships since it was chosen as an outpost for Japanese invaders and as the base for the Japanese forces<br />

for the following seven years, thus having to suffer from hardships for a long period of time. That is why<br />

there are still clear scars in Busan that are left from our ancestors’ resistance and fighting back against<br />

foreign forces.<br />

Let’s think about the 36-year history of the Japanese colonization. It was the first time when the country<br />

was directly and completely occupied by foreign forces. <strong>The</strong> buzz 4 words describing the Japanese<br />

colonization period are ‘culture politics,’ ‘degeneration of politics’ and ‘fraudulent politics.’ How frustrated<br />

and furious must Korean people have felt? Our ancestors made their resistance and protests when they<br />

were suppressed, discriminated and despised. And in Busan, an outpost city of Japanese colonial rule and<br />

oppression, such resistance and protests were fiercely staged. In the city of Busan, a historical fruit that was<br />

born as the city’s geographical feature is combined with the city’s traditional anti-invader national spirit.<br />

<strong>The</strong> national independence movement, which was mainly led by Baeksansanghwae, led to the youth<br />

movement since the protests of pier workers in the 1920s, Shinganhwae movement and the red labor union<br />

establishment movement in the 1930s and other various national libration movements in Busan. In terms<br />

of the strength and resilience of the protests and liberation movements, Busan stood out from other cities in<br />

the country and showed an unprecedented fighting spirit. 5 Korea’s liberation and independence, which were<br />

the results of resilient protests, then contributed to achieving the ideological independence and autonomy<br />

2 Although the name of Waegwan has been changed from Sampo to Doomopo, Jeolyoungdo and to Choryang over time,<br />

the history of Waegwan has always been centered in Busan. Kim Yong-Wook, <strong>The</strong> History and Spirit of Busan, p. 37.<br />

3 It was in the fourth year of King Sukjong’s reign in the Joseon Dynasty that Waegwan was relocated to the area near<br />

Yongdosan in Busan. Since then, Waegwan has been in the same area for approximately 200 years. <strong>The</strong> size of Waegwan<br />

in Busan was the largest among Waegwans in the Northeast Asian countries, reaching up to 110,000 pyeong. Kim Yong-<br />

Wook, <strong>The</strong> History and Spirit of Busan, pp. 90~91.<br />

4 <strong>The</strong>se words were used by Korean people to criticize and ridicule the Japanese colonialism during the pupil politics period<br />

(1919-1930). In the word ‘culture politics,’ the Chinese character for ‘culture’ also stands for mosquito ( ) and toad ( ).<br />

<strong>The</strong> ‘degeneration ( ) of politics’ was uttered to ridicule and challenge the culture politics of the Japanese ruler.<br />

5 <strong>The</strong> Korean Culture Institute of Pusan National University, <strong>The</strong> History and Culture of Busan, p. 171.<br />

680


of the country. <strong>The</strong> spirit of such resistance movements and protests continued in the social movements<br />

of the city in the aftermath of Korea’s liberation from Japanese colonialism and in the process of building<br />

a foundation for an autonomous national country, 6 which in turn paved the way for the growth of anti-<br />

authoritarian democratic movements afterwards.<br />

Now is the time to answer the question. Why Lee Jong-Ryul?<br />

Lee Jong-Ryul was chosen as a major historic figure who went through a series of historic events and thus<br />

is a symbolic figure that highlights Japan’s colonial oppression, discrimination, contempt and Korean<br />

people’s resistance, protests and fight against Japanese rule, the anti-foreign, anti-feudalism, and anti-<br />

imperialism that emerged in Korea, the country’s liberation from Japanese colonization and autonomous<br />

independence, national movements of liberation, anti-authoritarian movements and democratization.<br />

3. Who is Lee Jong-Ryul?<br />

Sansoo Lee Jong-Ryul was born in Jookjang-myeon, Pohang-si, North Gyeongsang Province on Jun 6th,<br />

1902. At the age of 21, in 1921, he joined Jeomgook Public Elementary School located in Jeomgook-<br />

myeon, Euisung, where he met with Park Myeong-Jin, a patriot who dropped out from Choongang High<br />

School in Seoul. Meeting with Park Myeong-Jin became a meaningful turning point in his life as he learned<br />

the pre-modern history of the country from Park Myeong-Jin and the existence of the interim government<br />

of the Republic of Korea through the education on politics provided by the Hogyeong Physical Education<br />

Institute. 7<br />

<strong>The</strong> Hogyeong Physical Education Institute was established by Park Myeong-Jin. Breaking away from the<br />

conventional movement in support of a return to the monarchy, Lee Jong-Ryul established a whole new<br />

approach to the anti-Japanese movements.<br />

Lee Jong-Ryul put the spirit of anti-feudalism into practice in Euisung and fought against the tyranny of<br />

6 <strong>The</strong> social movement in Busan was focused on gaining autonomy and independence and thus had no other choice but to<br />

fight against the authoritarian military government. Despite the continued oppression of the military government and its<br />

use of force, the social movement to build an autonomous nation and independent economy continued to be staged and<br />

became fiercer. In Jan 1946, the ‘Busan Citizens’s Rally’ was held in Busan with the enthusiastic participation of citizens.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Korean Culture Institute of Pusan National University, <strong>The</strong> History and Culture of Busan, p. 171.<br />

7 <strong>The</strong> Hogyeong Physical Education Institute was an association of young boys in the region established to promote anti-<br />

Japanese sentiment among young people. Park Myeong-Jin was the Chairman and the Secretary while Lee Jong-Ryul<br />

served as the Vice Secretary.<br />

681<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

feudal lords. Lee Jong-Ryul and Park Myeong-Yok—a brother of Park Myeong-Jin—visited Baekjeong<br />

Village and bowed, which was an astonishing incident in Euisung, a highly conservative region where<br />

strict hierarchy existed between feudal lords and vassals. This episode—highlighting the personality and<br />

character of a young patriot Lee Jong-Ryul—has become a legendary tale in Jeomgook Public Elementary<br />

School.<br />

After joining Dongmyeong School in Andong, Lee Jong-Ryul met Lee Hyung-Gook, Yoo Dong-Boong,<br />

Lee Ji-Ho and joined other patriotic activities and was deeply influenced by them. Dongmyeong School<br />

was a private school established to promote a mass-education drive in the late-Korean Empire period and<br />

had strong anti-Japanese sentiments. Lee Hyung-Gook, Yoo Dong-Boong and Lee Ji-Ho, eminent anti-<br />

Japanese patriotic activists in the Andong region became unforgettable teachers to Lee Jong-Ryul and Lee<br />

Hyung-Gook. Yoo Dong-Boong and Lee Ji-Ho continued their teacher-student relationship with Lee Jong-<br />

Ryul throughout his life.<br />

In 1924, Lee Jong-Ryul entered Baejae Junior High School and became a founding member and a member<br />

of the executive committee of Gyeongseong Youth Association, 8 a socialist association of young people.<br />

Back then, Gyeongseong Youth Association was considered a youth organization promoting relatively<br />

systematic popular movements on unification compared with other youth associations.<br />

As Lee Jong-Ryul began to participate in the activities of Gonghak Association (the student’s anti-Japanese<br />

movement association) in 1925, he became more actively engaged in anti-Japanese movements. <strong>The</strong><br />

Gonghak Association was the student’s movement organization established with the aim of promoting<br />

autonomous and independent social science research. Lee Jong-Ryul took the initiative and led the<br />

foundation of Gonghak Association. <strong>The</strong> ultimate purpose of establishing the Gonghak Association was<br />

to study social science with ‘joint forces’ and to strengthen ‘solidarity’ to fight against Japanese colonial<br />

education. It was the first students’ organization on social science research in Korea and the organization<br />

that opened a new chapter in the Korean students’ anti-Japanese movements by facilitating the students’<br />

secret activist activities. <strong>The</strong> Seongjin Association, which led the anti-Japanese movements in Gwangju<br />

later, was a secret student association that shared fundamental themes with the Gonghak Association.<br />

8 In the early 1920s, the youth movements were at the heart of the socialist movement. In 1924, young activities established<br />

the United Joseon Youth Association. Hwayo faction, Seoul faction and Bokpong faction, the major factions in the socialist<br />

movements back then, attempted to seize the control of the youth movement in the country by organizing the New<br />

Youth Association, the Seoul Youth Association and the Gyeongseong Youth Association respectively. At that time, most<br />

socialist youth movements were associated with those young activists. <strong>The</strong> Gyeongseong Youth Association held its inaugural<br />

assembly on Dec 11th, 1924.<br />

682


Although the Gonghak Association was forced to dissolve by the Japanese rule, its themes were sustained<br />

in the Joseon Students’ Science Research Institute, thus opening a new chapter in the student movement<br />

and becoming a central organization that led to the Jun 10th independence movement (hurray movement)<br />

in 1926. While preparing for the Jun 10th independence movement, Lee Jong-Ryul was arrested and taken<br />

into custody by police in Gyeonggi Province, where he met Han Yong-Woon, who greatly inspired him to<br />

pursue his activist movement. 9<br />

After the Jun 10th independence movement (hurray movement) in 1926, Lee Jong-Ryul was admitted<br />

to Waseda University in Japan to pursue higher education. He organized the Federation of Joseon Youth<br />

Associations in Japan. <strong>The</strong> Federation of Joseon Youth Associations in Japan was a united federation of<br />

Korean young people’s associations in Japan designed to unify the youth movement across Japan.<br />

In 1927, Lee Jong-Ryul led the establishment of the Tokyo Branch of the Shingan Association. <strong>The</strong><br />

Tokyo Branch of the Shingan Association protested against the tyranny of the Governor General while<br />

not accepting the Japanese colonial rule as a legitimate government. It launched the Gwandong Region<br />

Association opposing the tyranny of the Governor General in Korea in September 1927. 10 While serving<br />

as a member of the Shingan Association, Lee Jong-Ryul was able to build a firm belief in promoting<br />

national independence through the efforts made by national associations and federations - such as the<br />

Shingan Association - and began to recognize it as the essential element required to achieve the successful<br />

revolution of Joseon. Lee Jong-Ryul devoted himself to the activities promoting the vision of the Shingan<br />

Association and his endeavors whole serving in the National Gyeonyang Association and the National<br />

Independent Unification Central Council showed his ideology and enthusiasm in the national independence<br />

movement.<br />

While being actively engaged in the anti-Japanese national independence movement, he was also serving<br />

as a high-level executive official of the Confederation of Joseon Associations in Japan. <strong>The</strong> Confederation<br />

of Joseon Associations in Japan was a united confederation of major associations of Korean people<br />

9 <strong>The</strong> Jun 10th independence movement was a big project led by the Joseon communist party, Cheondoism followers and<br />

other nationalists. Those engaged in the initial preparation of the independence movement were arrested right before staging<br />

the movement. Later, students–led by the Joseon Student Social Science Research Institute–conducted independence<br />

hurray movement. Lee Jong-Ryul was also arrested and taken into police custody in Gyeonggi Province together with<br />

Han Yong-Woon and other leading patriotic activists. Kim Sun-Mi, <strong>The</strong> Historical Re-examination of Sansoo Lee Jong-<br />

Ryul’s National Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory, pp. 247-8.<br />

10 <strong>The</strong> Gwandong Region Association opposing the tyranny of Governor General was comprised of 14 relevant associa-<br />

<strong>The</strong> Gwandong Region Association opposing the tyranny of Governor General was comprised of 14 relevant associations<br />

including the Confederation of Joseon Workers Union in Japan, Tokyo Branch of Shingan Association, the Students’<br />

Association, the Federation of Joseon Youth in Tokyo and the New Science Research Institute.<br />

683<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

organized in Japan.<br />

In 1928, Lee Jong-Ryul also established the ‘Joseon Student Strike Safeguard Alliance in Japan.’ After<br />

Lee Jong-Ryul came back to Korea, he was arrested as a mastermind behind the national students’ alliance<br />

movement under the Public Order Act. At that time, he was a teacher at a village school for children<br />

of the disadvantaged in Seoul. Together with Lee Hyun-Chul and Jang Hong-Yeom, he printed slogan<br />

posters – which said ‘Rise Up, Joseon Students’ – in Japan and sent them to Korea via mail and distributed<br />

them to stage nation-wide anti-Japanese protests in school strikes. Lee Jong-Ryul began to teach at the<br />

village school in Seoul after July 1927 when he was expelled from Waseda University due to the ‘Korean<br />

Research Society’ incident and came back to Korea. 11<br />

In 1930, Lee Jong-Ryul, Hyun Joon-Hyuk and Yoo Jin-Oh established the Social Status Research Center in<br />

order to analyze the reality facing domestic society and thus lay logical grounds for their social movements<br />

and activities. In Jul of the following year, Lee Jong-Ryul launched the monthly magazine Leereota and<br />

served as a publisher and editor-in-chief. 12 Leereota mainly covered domestic issue articles denouncing<br />

Japan’s policy to divide the country, its colonialism policy, analysis of various domestic social movements<br />

and incidents, and international articles dealing with the political and economic status of other countries<br />

around the world and analysis of international circumstances.<br />

Around that time, Lee Jong-Ryul began to actively participate in the emancipation movement called the<br />

equity movement to liberate the lowest class of society and also in the equity youth avant-garde alliance.<br />

<strong>The</strong> activities of the equity youth avant-garde alliance were investigated by police in Gwangju in 1933 and<br />

members of the alliance were severely tortured through the investigation process. As a result, the alliance’s<br />

national network was revealed, and a total of fourteen people were put to trial. Thirteen people were<br />

found not guilty but Lee Jong-Ryul was sentenced to three years and six months of imprisonment and was<br />

imprisoned in Gwangju Prison till Nov 1936.<br />

In 1938, he was again imprisoned and horribly tortured in Gongjoo Prison on charges of violating the<br />

Publishing Act and the Public Order Act. Even after he was released from prison, he was placed on<br />

probation by the Governor General. Since the 1940s, he disguised himself as a ‘charcoal burner in<br />

11 <strong>The</strong> village school refers to the Seoul Village School (<br />

<strong>The</strong> village school refers to the Seoul Village School ( ) that Lee Joon-Ryul established. After Lee Joon-Ryul<br />

came back to Korea in Jul 1928, he began to teach at the school in September 1928.<br />

12 <strong>The</strong> monthly magazine<br />

<strong>The</strong> monthly magazine Leereota was launched in Jul 1931 and published 57 issues for a period of four years and seven<br />

months until 1936.<br />

684


Gapyeong’ who burns and sells charcoal and lived in Gail-ri, Seolak-myeon, Gapyeong-gun, Gyeonggi<br />

Province to avoid repression in the late colonial period. On Aug 10th, 1944, he again joined hands with the<br />

Joseon National Foundation Alliance to continue his anti-Japanese underground activities.<br />

Lee Jong-Ryul continued his activities to promote national revolution even after Korea was liberated from<br />

Japanese colonial rule in 1945. He was actively involved in the establishment of the Joseon Academy of<br />

Science, which declared nationalist ideology. He firmly believed that establishing a unified government of<br />

the North and the South is the only way to avoid division of the country and national war and to achieve<br />

national autonomy. Against such a backdrop, he established the National Geonyang Association to put his<br />

firm belief into practice.<br />

In January 1946, the National Geonyang Association was launched by Lee Jong-Ryul to provide support<br />

to the process of building the national revolution party. As a matter of fact, the National Geonyang<br />

Association was an organization that shows the essence of Lee Jong-Ryul’s historical view that promoted<br />

the national revolution movements to stage nationalist unification movements and promote a national<br />

independent and autonomous country. <strong>The</strong> Association recognized such national revolution movements<br />

as a historical challenge facing the country as it was about to take a step toward the establishment of an<br />

independent country.<br />

In 1947, the National Geonyang Association formed the organization of people to promote democratization<br />

and independence movements. During that period, Lee Jong-Ryul was engaged in democratization and<br />

nationalist movements to raise awareness of the public through publicity activities as an editor-in-chief of<br />

Democratic Daily. 13 ‘Min-jok-geon-yang ( )’ is a word created by Lee Jong-Ryul, which means ‘we<br />

should build and promote a nation.’<br />

In the 1950s, Lee Jong-Ryul conducted the autonomous national unification movement as the country went<br />

through the tragedy of the Korean War. He recognized the Korean War as part of the national revolution<br />

movement and continued to pursue the establishment of an independent nation.<br />

In 1951, Lee Jong-Ryul was asked by the then Vice President in the interim capital city of Busan to serve<br />

13 Kim Gyu-Shik was the president of<br />

Kim Gyu-Shik was the president of Democratic Daily and Shin Ik-Hee, who ran for presidential election in 1956, was<br />

the newspaper’s advisor. Lee Jong-Ryul tried to implement the unification policy by participating in the Shin Il-Hee’s<br />

camp that promotes non-violent political negotiations and national unification based on the peaceful unification theory<br />

of the National Gunyang Association. However, Lee Jong-Ryul’s such efforts were aborted because Shin Il-Hee passed<br />

away while campaigning in the presidential election.<br />

685<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

as a professor at Pusan National University. At the Pusan National University, he taught political ideology,<br />

Korean political history and the theory on political party and formed an academic and practical network<br />

with other professors and students at Pusan National University and in the political science department<br />

of Donga University. Together with his students, in 1954, Lee Jong-Ryul organized the National Culture<br />

Association to support the establishment of an independent nation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> National Culture Association was Busan’s leading organization to promote public activist campaigns<br />

back in the late 1950s. A number of progressive intellectuals in Busan and other regions in South<br />

Gyeongsang Province participated in such campaigns. <strong>The</strong> public activist campaigns continued until the<br />

year 1960 when the National Culture Association handed over its roles and missions to the Democratic<br />

National Youth Alliance. <strong>The</strong> Democratic National Youth Alliance served as the basis of the country’s<br />

autonomous national unification movements, which was led mainly by the National Independent<br />

Unification Central Council.<br />

During the period from 1957 to the late 1950s, Lee Jong-Ryul was engaged in anti-foreign nationalist<br />

independence movements together with like-minded people in Busan and served as an editorial writer to<br />

Busan Daily and International Daily, writing articles to help the public build awareness of the national<br />

revolution theory. 14 He also served as an editorial writer and editor-in-chief of Yeongnam Daily, a leading<br />

newspaper in support of the opposition party and progressive political forces in Daegu. Lee Soon-Hee,<br />

the president of Yeongnam Daily, provided full support to the Democratic National Youth Alliance and<br />

National Independent Unification Central Council. Through the process, Lee Jong-Ryul was the medium<br />

for Lee Soon-Hee to provide resources and support to the Democratic National Youth Alliance and<br />

National Independent Unification Central Council.<br />

<strong>The</strong> national resistance movements in Mar. and Apr. 1960 served as an opportunity for Lee Jong-Ryul<br />

to pave the way for full-fledged national democratic movements. In early May 1960, Lee Jong-Ryul<br />

established the Democratic Nationalist Youth Council (tentative name) for young people in Busan to stage<br />

new political protests for national revolution. <strong>The</strong> establishment of the Democratic Nationalist Youth<br />

Council was proposed by 114 promoters and the title was later confirmed to be the Democratic National<br />

Youth Alliance (hereinafter referred to as Min-min-chung). Min-min-chung declared that we should build<br />

our independent history through people’s capitalist democratic and national revolution movements and<br />

pursued the autonomous youth movement in pursuit of unification.<br />

14 One of the major articles is “<strong>The</strong> Political Science for Millions of Readers,” a newspaper serial that ran 41 issues since<br />

One of the major articles is “<strong>The</strong> Political Science for Millions of Readers,” a newspaper serial that ran 41 issues since<br />

late 1958 in International Daily.<br />

686


<strong>The</strong> establishment of Min-min-chung encouraged Lee Jong-Ryul to establish the National Autonomous<br />

Unification Central Council (hereinafter referred to as Min-ja-tong). After he established Min-ja-tong,<br />

Lee Jong-Ryul concentrated on expanding the organization of Min-ja-tong based on anti-foreign national<br />

autonomous movements in a broad endeavor to put his national revolution theory of pursuing autonomous<br />

national foundation movements into practice. To him, Min-ja-tong was a medium for him to consolidate<br />

forces to pursue both unification of the country and national revolution.<br />

After Min-ja-tong became a national organization in 1961, Lee Jong-Ryul played a critical role in putting<br />

together unification policies as part of Min-ja-tong’s key projects. Lee Jong-Ryul was a person who<br />

pursued large-scale unification movements for the first time in Korea since the Korean War.<br />

In addition to participating in Min-ja-tong’s activities, Lee Jong-Ryul took the initiative in establishing<br />

Nation Daily in February 1961. <strong>The</strong> initial name of the newspaper was ‘Public Daily’ but was later changed<br />

to ‘Nation Daily’ at a suggestion Lee Jong-Ryul made in a gathering in preparation for the newspaper’s<br />

foundation. <strong>The</strong> name of the newspaper is deeply associated with the nature of this and highlights Lee<br />

Jong-Ryul’s political position during the period of the national resistance movements in Mar. and Apr.<br />

Lee Jong-Ryul planned to turn Nation Daily into a newspaper dedicated to the national revolution theory<br />

by integrating national movement forces and publishing articles to raise people’s awareness of the nation. 15<br />

However, in just three years since its very first issue published on Feb. 13th, 1961, Nation Daily was<br />

forced to shut down by the military coup forces upon publishing # 92 issue. Lee Jong-Ryul was arrested on<br />

charges of the activities in Min-ja-tong and involvement in the Nation Daily incident and was sentenced to<br />

ten years’ imprisonment in Seodaemoon Prison.<br />

Lee Jong-Ryul took over Gaewoon Junior High School in Yangsan, South Gyeongsang Province after he<br />

was released in Dec. 1965. Since then, he continued to conduct national education campaigns and collapsed<br />

from a stroke while he was coming back from his visit to the historical site dedicated to Ahn Hee-Jae, an<br />

independence movement activist, in 1974. Until he passed away after years of struggle with the stroke, Lee<br />

Jong-Ryul exerted his utmost effort to promote national revolution movements. On Mar 13th, 1989, Lee<br />

Jong-Ryul left his final words “Min-jok-geon-yang-sa-ro (toward national foundation),” a slogan in pursuit<br />

of people’s revolution and national revolution in history, and the ‘Sa-cheak-dang: the avant-garde party that<br />

15 Refer to the following publication on<br />

Refer to the following publication on Nation Daily and its founder Lee Jong-Ryul: Kim Ji-Hyeong, “Nation Daily and<br />

Sansoo Lee Jong-Ryul,” <strong>The</strong> Historical Re-examination of Sansoo Lee Jong-Ryul’s National Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory, pp. 314-<br />

348.<br />

687<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

promotes national revolution’ and passed away at the age of 87.<br />

4. Is Lee Jong-Ryul alive or dead?<br />

What is the life of thought? It is “a concrete and effective force that lifts up the generation in historical<br />

crises and helps it move forward.” 16 This then leads to another question. Is Lee Jong-Ryul alive or dead?<br />

Is his ideology and thought still relevant for people of today as we try to rescue our history and move it<br />

forward into the future?<br />

Lee Jong-Ryul stated that “all social theories should be understood based on its historical time and<br />

conditions” and “it is natural that Marx and Engels, [who were living in a different society at a different<br />

time], were not able to speak for our country’s revolution in a logical sense.” 17 In short, academic theories<br />

and ideologies cannot be understood in isolation and they should be considered together with their<br />

historical and social background. We can apply this to Lee Jong-Ryul’s theories and ideologies. How<br />

about his theories and ideologies? Are they alive or dead? Our answer is that ‘Lee Jong-Ryul is still alive’<br />

meaning that his theories and ideologies are still relevant for today’s society in Korea. Why is that?<br />

Let us first look into this perception of problems and methodologies for healing used in his People’s<br />

Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory. Drawing a clear picture of the problem is like making a diagnosis of problems facing<br />

society, and it is essential to make an accurate diagnosis of problems in order to heal the wounds caused by<br />

such problems. It is difficult to talk about healing and correcting the problems without having an accurate<br />

diagnosis because it is possible to come up with correct and practical treatment methods for healing<br />

problems only when we make a correct diagnosis.<br />

1) Diagnosis of Problems and Methodologies for Problem Solving in the People’s History 18<br />

“<strong>The</strong>ories should be verified thoroughly to see whether they are based on falsified background knowledge<br />

or on the historical truth in a critical and analytic manner.” 19 Only when we make critical analysis and<br />

introspection of the past and history, can we move our history forward into the future. What does this<br />

mean? This means there have been people who tried to distort our history, not looking at it as it is, and<br />

16 Lee Jong-Ryu, National Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory, p. 23.<br />

17 Lee Jong-Ryu, National Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory, p. 238. <strong>The</strong> phrase in [ ] is written by the author.<br />

18 People’s History ( ) is a term created by the author to make a distinction between the ‘Lee Jong-Ryul’s correct<br />

history’ and the general history.<br />

19 Lee Jong-Ryu, National Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory, p. 356.<br />

688


there are still those people who are trying to adjust and use history to their advantage. A case in point is the<br />

conservative vested interests and those in power in current Korean society.<br />

Introspection on the past is taking stock of the past and coming back to the current reality. However, the<br />

eyes of the conservative forces are fixated on the past and remain there. That is why the conservative make<br />

no introspection on the past. When someone introspects on the past, he or she is bound to come back to the<br />

current reality. Without coming back to the current reality and applying the lessons learned to the current<br />

reality, it is hard to say that the person has fully introspected on the past. <strong>The</strong> present reality is where the<br />

historical lessons are being applied. Introspecting on the past means that the person is trying to apply the<br />

lessons learned from the past history to the present reality. Through critical analysis and examination, we<br />

can introspect on the past and determine our current history and accordingly pave a new historical path<br />

( ) for the future.<br />

Without having a correct understanding of history, we cannot understand what the current problems are<br />

and analyze the historical truth behind the cause of the problems, which means it is all the more important<br />

to accumulate historical references. <strong>The</strong>n, Lee Jong-Ryul asks us the following question: where is our<br />

historical path headed? To which direction is our history moving forward? By asking such questions, we<br />

will be able to draw a clearer picture of the problems in our history.<br />

History ‘marches forward on the historical path,’ which means that history is walking on the path of<br />

history. <strong>The</strong>n, is history walking on the historical path spontaneously? <strong>The</strong> answer is no. If something is<br />

moving spontaneously, that is not history but nature. History is not the same as nature. History needs the<br />

right historical path, the right direction and the following movements. <strong>The</strong> order of building history is as<br />

follows: historical path-route-strategy-practice-historical path. <strong>The</strong> forward-looking historical perception<br />

paves the way for the historical path and route, which in turn determines strategies, tactics and practices.<br />

In short, the historical path opens up when historical practices are implemented. 20 ‘People forces’ or the<br />

general public played a role in the progress of history. That leads to another question: why does history<br />

change its composition and nature? By trying to answer this question, we will be able to draw a clear<br />

picture of the problems.<br />

20 Park Man-joon, “<strong>The</strong> Historical Philosophy and Ideology of People’s Revolution,” <strong>The</strong> Historical Re-examination of<br />

Sansoo Lee Jong-Ryul’s National Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory, pp. 29~34. In the developments of historical path, the historical<br />

path is the beginning and putting the theory into practice is the end. <strong>The</strong>n, is putting the theory on historical path the<br />

completion of history? No. <strong>The</strong> historical route has a circular structure where practices again meet with the historical<br />

path. That is why it is said that the historical path opens up with practices. Of course, the historical path before putting<br />

the theory into practice and after putting the theory into practice is different. <strong>The</strong> historical path after putting the theory<br />

into practice is a new historical path that is heading people progressively toward into the future.<br />

689<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Lee Jong-Ryul called the society with people with many different interests a ‘political society.’ In political<br />

society, there exist constant confrontations between public forces. In People’s History, political society is<br />

the same as historical society. Is the history always going in the direction for promoting virtue or pursuing<br />

new values, instead of the opposing direction? That is the third question People’s History asks. 21<br />

2) People’s Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory<br />

We saw that Lee Jong-Ryul’s theory is still relevant today by examining the perception of problems in<br />

People’s History. Based on the clear picture of problems as shown in the above three examples, Lee Jong-<br />

Ryul asked and tried to answer the question: where should our history be headed in the future in People’s<br />

Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory? People’s revolution is short for National Revolution and People’s Revolution.<br />

When we think of national revolution, Lenin’s national revolution instantly comes to our minds. On Jul.<br />

20th, 1920, Lenin declared that “People in China and Joseon should make national revolution not the<br />

socialist revolution movements” in his remarks made at the International Communist Party Convention.<br />

His remarks emphasized that the historical events in the Northeast Asian region–such as Korea and China–<br />

should be understood and analyzed in a different manner and thus remedy or measures applied to those<br />

countries should be different from the ones applied to the countries in other regions of the world. Also,<br />

what he was trying to emphasize is that it is highly important to conduct scientific analysis of historical<br />

facts in different regions in the world to build an appropriate understanding of the history of each region<br />

and the differences.<br />

Lenin, who lived in the era of financial capitalism, is living in a different historical time when compared<br />

with Marx, who lived in the era of industrial capitalism. According to Marx, the confrontation between<br />

laborers and capitalists is inevitable and unavoidable. In the process of promoting national revolution, it<br />

is more efficient and beneficial for laborers to join hands with capitalists as one nation to fight against the<br />

oppression of imperialistic foreign forces. Ignoring such possibilities of national movements and insisting<br />

socialist revolution or communist revolution is just ‘an anti-national and anti-revolution act,’ 22 which were<br />

well shown in the example of Hyun Joon-Hyuk, a leader of the branches of the Joseon Communist Party in<br />

the five Northwestern Provinces, who insisted the three-step revolution theory (national revolution-socialist<br />

revolution-communist revolution).<br />

21 In People’s History, the winner in the battle between the force of stepping forward exerted by the public and the oppos- opposing<br />

force of power is always the force of stepping forward. Is People’s History a merely optimistic and idealistic theory?<br />

<strong>The</strong> analysis of the cycle involving the historical path and practices demonstrates that it is not merely being optimistic.<br />

22 Lee Jong-Ryu, National Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory, p. 239.<br />

690


In this regard, national revolution can be divided into two kinds. <strong>The</strong> national revolution in Hyun Joon-<br />

Hyun’s three-step revolution theory is completely different from the national revolution in People’s History<br />

and is also different from Lenin’s national revolution. Lenin’s national revolution is merely a step in the<br />

two-step revolution theory. According to Lenin’s revolution theory, national revolution is followed by the<br />

socialist revolution. 23<br />

In People’s History, the path that history should be headed to can only be built through national revolution,<br />

indicating that only national revolution is required other than other socialist revolution, communist<br />

revolution and other kinds of revolutions relevant for the generation. Does that mean that history is<br />

completed through national revolution? No. “<strong>The</strong> national revolution is not a completion of history with a<br />

clear beginning and end; rather, it is the initial ( ) process through which the history is built.” 24 In other<br />

words, national revolution is the process to complete history rather that something that puts an end to<br />

history. <strong>The</strong>n, what are the following ( ) steps required after national revolution? That must be people’s<br />

revolution. In this sense, Lee Jong-Ryul’s People’s Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory is essentially in the same vein as his<br />

slogan Min-jok-geon-yang-sa-ro ( ): Historical Path toward National Foundation.<br />

Min-jok-geon-yang stands for the movement that promotes national foundation. In other words, it is<br />

referring to ‘the high-level scientific socialist society movements to build a people’s country, force and<br />

architecture of promoting people’s bourgeoisie democracy.’ In short, Min-jok-geon-yang is the movement<br />

promoting both national foundation and people’s foundation, which doesn’t mean that the nation should<br />

be built first to promote people’s foundation. <strong>The</strong> national revolution is the process of revolution that is<br />

implemented to build a nation and dissolve it afterwards. In this regard, Lee Jong-Ryul’s national theory<br />

stands out from other nationalism theories that view the national scheme as the ultimate alternative.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n, what are the sequences of the stages of human revolution and national revolution? Is national<br />

revolution following human revolution naturally and automatically? Not at all. <strong>The</strong> term Min-jok-geon-<br />

yang-sa-ro ( ) shows the answer. National revolution is ‘the following step of the revolution<br />

and also a prelude to human revolution.’ 25 Human revolution is a following step of national revolution<br />

to complete the entire historical path, and thus it can be called a culmination of the true national history.<br />

23 <strong>The</strong> term ‘national revolution’ began to spread after Lenin used it in “<strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>sis on National and Colonialism Issues.”<br />

National revolution refers to a revolutionary national movement that is different from advanced bourgeoisie movements<br />

in colony countries. However, Lee Jong-Ryul used the term ‘national revolution’ as an abbreviation for ‘ordinary<br />

people’s capitalist democratization national revolution.’ Kim Sun-Mi, Lee Jong-Ryu’s National Movements and Political<br />

<strong>The</strong>ory, Paragraph 2, Chapter 2.<br />

24 Lee Jong-Ryu,<br />

Lee Jong-Ryu, National Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory, p. 70.<br />

25 <strong>The</strong> Memorial Foundation of Sansoo Lee Jong-Ryul, Collection of Publications of Sansoo Lee Jong-Ryul 1-2, p. 392.<br />

691<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

That is, national revolution is an economical, social and historic revolution that rescues the history and<br />

that contributes to the detailed contents of the human history. When history gets changed, the society – the<br />

historical place – also gets changed and consequently people living in society also get changed. That is why<br />

national revolution takes place at first, followed by human revolution and people’s revolution.<br />

“All the accomplishments of national revolution are likening to the root of human revolution while the<br />

accomplishments of human revolution can be likened to branches and flowers of national revolution.”<br />

And “although the root, branches and flowers have different characteristics, they’re are all part of a single<br />

organic being.” 26 Here, ‘organic being’ refers to the general status and theoretical meaning of people’s<br />

revolution. In other words, it refers to the comprehensive process of people’s revolution that rescues people<br />

from the historical crisis and puts them onto the new historical path.<br />

Why is the revolution that rescues people from historical crises and puts them onto the new historical path<br />

called people’s revolution? What is the reason? As demonstrated in the case of other names and titles<br />

created throughout the history, the term people’s revolution was created to describe the unique essence<br />

of what it refers to. 27 People’s revolution is focused on the direction of human history whereas citizens’<br />

revolution in the pre-modern era is centered on economical, political and social essence. <strong>The</strong> direction of<br />

human history refers to the historical path toward achieving human values in a whole new sense.<br />

People’s revolution is the process of rescuing our people from historical crises and helping people move<br />

forward on a new historical path. 28 That is why it is considered both national revolution and human<br />

revolution. Overcoming the ‘marginalization of people’ or ‘marginalization of humanity’ in the social and<br />

human sciences is like people’s revolution when their ideologies are taken into account. That is because<br />

such marginalization is caused in the political and social relationships of economic forces, and people’s<br />

revolution is the only way to resolve such marginalization.<br />

That doesn’t mean resolving the issue of marginalization and rescuing people from the depths of despair<br />

incurred by marginalization is not the same as ‘the recovery of humanity.’ When we say we ‘restore’<br />

something, it is about re-gaining something that we have lost. <strong>The</strong>n, from which period should we have to<br />

restore our humanity? <strong>The</strong>re is no exemplary humanity existing in the world, and we didn’t have it in the<br />

beginning. That is why people change accordingly as society changes.<br />

26 Lee Jong-Ryu,<br />

Lee Jong-Ryu, National Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory, p. 71.<br />

27 <strong>The</strong> revolution that brought the history of the medieval times into the pre-modern era is called capitalist democratization<br />

<strong>The</strong> revolution that brought the history of the medieval times into the pre-modern era is called capitalist democratization<br />

revolution or citizens’ revolution.<br />

28 <strong>The</strong> reason Lee Jong-Ryul emphasized national unifi cation is directly related to this. Without achieving national unifi ca-<br />

<strong>The</strong> reason Lee Jong-Ryul emphasized national unification is directly related to this. Without achieving national unification,<br />

our national identity would remain ‘ragged, ripped off and fallen to the ground’ and the only way to restore ‘the<br />

falling national identity values’ is to unify the divided country. Lee Jong-Ryu, National Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory, p. 117.<br />

692


Human revolution is the historical path that leads to ‘the direction of contributing gradually to the formation<br />

of personality.’ <strong>The</strong> ‘direction’ is the ideological orientation of people’s revolution. What is the ideology<br />

for people’s revolution? What does rescuing personality and helping people march forward on a new<br />

historical path do? Although we have explored them to some extent, we need to see the changing status of<br />

people in the history of humanity in order to have a concrete understanding of the ideology. To this end,<br />

the research on history is important and essential 29 since it is all the anti-human and inhumane incidents or<br />

facts in human history that human revolution is trying to resolve. 30<br />

<strong>The</strong> ideological orientation of human revolution is part of the stage in human history. That is, human<br />

revolution is designed to denounce all anti-human events or incidents of the past and to encourage the<br />

gentle and kind nature in people that tend to help and support each other to become heroes and heroines,<br />

thus achieving the ‘noblest and most-urgent ideal of human history.’ What is noteworthy is the fact that<br />

the problems facing people today become the problems facing all of humanity, which in turn spark the<br />

problems facing the nation. That is because ordinary people are the protagonists in our history and history<br />

cannot exist without them. <strong>The</strong>refore, we should continue to build our truthful history by having a correct<br />

understanding of the problems that were placed in front of them.<br />

5. Conclusion<br />

Now we know that the life of Lee Jong-Ryul is a manifestation of his thoughts and ideologies, and his<br />

thoughts and ideologies were well present in his acts and life. We now also know that Sansoo Lee Jong-<br />

Ryul is a representative person who highlights historical milestones and turning points in Busan - such<br />

as the People’s resistance movement against the oppression and discrimination by foreign forces, anti-<br />

Japanese and anti-foreign movements, liberation and self-achieved autonomy of the nation, the national<br />

movements to attain Korea’s liberation from Japanese colonial rule, anti-authoritarian and democratization<br />

movements.<br />

As pointed out earlier, the problem is that his life and ideology is still relevant for us who are living in the<br />

present day. His wounds are our wounds and healing those wounds would help heal our wounds made in<br />

the current historical age.<br />

29 According to people’s history, ‘history is drawn by the heroes of the history’ and they are the gentle and kind nature of<br />

ordinary people who help each other while cooperating to make a living together in the production activities. Lee Jong-<br />

Ryul, Let’s Look into Gimi, p. 141. Lee Jong-Ryu, National Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory, p. 151.<br />

30 For more information on anti-human and inhumane events and activities in human history, refer to<br />

For more information on anti-human and inhumane events and activities in human history, refer to National Revolution<br />

<strong>The</strong>ory, pp. 150~151.<br />

693<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

1) Ordinary People’s Capitalism<br />

Kim Jin-Sook, Korea’s first female welder, was standing on crane No. 85 on Yeongdo shipbuilding yard on<br />

Jan. 6th, 2011. Why did she climb on the crane? <strong>The</strong> place was where Kim Joo-Ik took his own life after a<br />

129-day sit-in eight years ago. However, it is not the place where Kim Joo-Ik desperately cried for justice<br />

and died alone, rather it is an icon for hope.<br />

As ordinary citizens jumped on the hope bus, they let society know who Kim Jin-Sook is. That is how hope<br />

comes to us.<br />

Some say it is ‘the bridge where citizens and laborers meet together,’ while others call it ‘the solidarity of<br />

marginalized and oppressed people.’ That is true. It is a voluntary alliance of solidarity that is free from<br />

segmentation and isolation. Crane No. 85 and the hope bus are symbols of such solidarity. While sending<br />

the 3 rd hope bus, she said that “when we are busy, we had to work day and night for a week. Many people<br />

dozed off while waiting in line to get lunch, but we didn’t dare to ask for a day off. I had blisters that<br />

popped up on my fingers and my lack of skills with scissors made me damage the fabric. Every time I<br />

damaged the fabric, I was hit on the cheek and kicked by the manager, so there were always bruises on my<br />

calves. Still, I was able to endure all those difficulties waiting for payday on the 7 th .”<br />

Is this ordinary people’s capitalism? <strong>The</strong> answer is no. How could the historical path where ordinary<br />

people become the protagonists under the social ideologies of capitalism and democracy look like<br />

that? I’m astonished at Lee Jong-Ryul’s analysis of historical facts, capitalism and People’s History.<br />

A couple of decades ago, he already saw through the essence of capitalistic reality facing us – the<br />

reality of nothing ( ) in People’s History - in today’s world. 31 What makes the reality nothing? In a<br />

nutshell, it means society lacks democracy, autonomy, independence, ordinary nature, equality as well<br />

as democratic productivity. That is why ‘ordinary people’s capitalistic democratization and national<br />

revolution’ can be an alternative, which is designed to build a democratic, autonomous, independent,<br />

citizen-oriented, productive and equal national society.<br />

Lee Jong-Ryul divided capitalism into centralized capitalism and ordinary people’s capitalism while<br />

dividing democracy into bourgeoisie democracy (capitalist democracy) and proletarian democracy (labor<br />

democracy). <strong>The</strong>n, he divided capitalist democracy into centralized capitalist democracy and decentralized<br />

31 Lee Jong-Ryu, National Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory, p. 385.<br />

694


citizen-oriented capitalist democracy. <strong>The</strong>refore, there is a fundamental difference between citizen-oriented<br />

capitalist democratization national revolution and the citizens’ revolution of the western world (capitalist<br />

democratization revolution). Considering the fact that both are based on the same political philosophy of<br />

private property-based capitalism, citizens’ revolution is the same as national revolution. However, we are<br />

in a situation to pursue citizen-oriented economic schemes in a neo-liberalism and imperialistic order, and<br />

that is why our revolution is distinct from the revolution of the western world in nature.<br />

2) Democracy<br />

Citizens in the west and citizens in our society have been different and remain different as of now. Thus,<br />

capitalism and democracy in the west and in our society have been different and remain different in<br />

nature. That is why citizen-oriented capitalistic, democratic national revolution is proposed. When history<br />

changes, society and people change. And when society is in a different age and has different historical<br />

characteristics, capitalism and democracy in that society - as well as its nationalism - should change.<br />

Busan has always been a place where democratic and nationalistic political activities take place. It was a<br />

place where citizens were engaged in the movement to restore national sovereignty to fight Japanese forces.<br />

Citizens in Busan have continued to be engaged in the movement to build a nation after Korea’s liberation<br />

from Japanese colonization. That is not it. Busan citizens were major forces behind the national resistance<br />

movements in Mar. and Apr. <strong>The</strong> only problem is that such ‘democratization movements’ still continue<br />

these days.<br />

Democratic Park in Busan, the symbol of the city and the city’s national resistance movements in Mar.<br />

and Apr. is not and should not be a place for beautiful rituals to heal the wounds of the city; it should not<br />

be a memorial (the substitute of memory) where people merely recall one’s mind and reflect on the past.<br />

Fixating the past on the past and thinking the past is gone is leading to the death of history and the past.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, Democratic Park in Busan should not become a fancy park that is consumed like a cultural or<br />

touristic product regardless of its historical significance. Rather, it should become a productive place to<br />

create and promote history for democracy.<br />

3) Nation Unification 32<br />

It is not easy to come up with a realistic alternative to our history and social revolution. One of the major<br />

32 As our nation was not united in a single nation, the correct term is ‘reunifi ‘reunification’ cation’ - not ‘unifi ‘unification’.<br />

cation’.<br />

695<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

reasons can be found in the reality of our country being divided. What does that mean? When the nation<br />

is divided, its autonomy and democracy are undermined and society becomes anti-autonomous and anti-<br />

democratic. <strong>The</strong> national division is a historical reality that shows anti-autonomous characteristics of our<br />

society most vividly and is an existential foundation for anti-democratic forces. <strong>The</strong>refore, unification<br />

should be promoted in an autonomous and democratic manner. That is why People’s History emphasized<br />

Yeong-ou ( : controlling) foreign forces, autonomous route, min-jok-geon-yang independent route,<br />

from which strategies and tactics for national unification come out in the form of ‘national unification Sam-<br />

min-non-check (three-step people’s strategies).’ 33<br />

Controlling (Yeong-ou) foreign forces doesn’t necessarily mean expelling or driving out foreign forces.<br />

Rather, it means we have to proactively adjust their presence on our own land. Depending on how we deal<br />

with foreign forces, the responses of foreign forces and their effects would become different. Controlling<br />

(Yeong-ou) foreign forces is about responding to the invasion and oppression of the foreign forces<br />

without losing our autonomy and independence and implementing strategies to build an autonomous<br />

and independent nation. In addition, people’s great ego tactics are also required to take control of foreign<br />

forces. 34<br />

<strong>The</strong> process through which we achieve unification of the nation will determine the direction of the future<br />

society after the unification. Unification by foreign forces is just a forced physical unification of the<br />

country, which doesn’t necessarily lead to the path toward a democratic and autonomous unified nation and<br />

doesn’t transform our society into the right direction.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, the division and unification of the nation is not a distant discourse that is far from our everyday<br />

life. It is not something that is not affecting our lives. So we can’t say it would be good to achieve national<br />

unification, but it is ok if the country remains divided. Why did so many people give their precious lives for<br />

the cause of realizing an autonomous and democratic world? As highlighted in the ideological orientation<br />

of people’s revolution, unification of our nation will allow us to live more like human beings.<br />

33 National unifi cation Sam-min-non-check (three-step people’s strategies) (<br />

National unification Sam-min-non-check (three-step people’s strategies) ( ) refers to Min-jok-geonyang<br />

independent route ( ), people’s autonomous extraterritorial strategies ( ),<br />

people’s absolute ego tactics ( ).<br />

34 Being segmented and confronting with each other like children are like part of the nation’s unifi cation tactics and strate-<br />

Being segmented and confronting with each other like children are like part of the nation’s unification tactics and strategies<br />

to control foreign forces and to promote Min-jok-geon-yang independent route. Unification is the resounding victory<br />

for our absolute ego that evolves and develops our national history.<br />

696


4) In-jong-seong ( ) & In-eui-neung ( )<br />

People’s History provides a message of hope to the problems of oppression, isolation, marginalization and<br />

hardships of people throughout history where ordinary citizens are not the protagonists in the historical<br />

time. What is the message Kim Jin-Sook tried to convey standing on Crane No.85? That is ‘I’m also<br />

human,’ and ‘I want to be treated like a human being.’ People’s History calls this ‘In-jong-seong’ and ‘In-<br />

eui-neung:’ people living and being treated like human beings. This refers to the idealistic term ‘Seong-<br />

neung,’ where all negative personalities are removed.<br />

In the term ‘Seong-neung,’ ‘seong’ refers to the Chinese character that means the existential status and<br />

meaning of human being, while ‘neung’ refers to the status and meaning of practical activities. <strong>The</strong><br />

existential status in ‘seong’ is combined with a practical ‘neung’ to show that ‘Seong-neung (humanity)’<br />

evolves over time according to social and historical conditions. ‘Seong’ is influenced by ‘neung’ and ‘neung’<br />

is influenced by ‘seong’ in a reciprocal interaction. That is why people change when history evolves over<br />

time. That is what ‘In-jong-seong’ and ‘In-eui-neung’ means in people’s revolution. National unification<br />

and revolution are required for people to live like human beings and to be treated like human beings and<br />

‘In-jong-seong’ and ‘In-eui-neung’ exist to achieve such revolutions.<br />

‘In-jong-seong’ and ‘In-eui-neung’ refer to people who exist and live in a democratic way, people who<br />

exist and live in an autonomous way, people who exist and live in an independent manner, people who<br />

exist and live like ordinary citizens and people who exist and are treated equally with other people. 35<br />

References<br />

Gang Man-Gil, “<strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>ory on Ethnically Homogenous Nation Establishment in National Independence<br />

Movement,” Korean Nationalism <strong>The</strong>ory, Chang-Bi, 1982.<br />

Kim Min-Hwan, <strong>The</strong> Research on Nation Daily, Nanam Publishing, 2006.<br />

Kim Sun-Mi, “<strong>The</strong> Historical Re-examination of Sansoo Lee Jong-Ryul’s National Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory,”<br />

Doctoral <strong>The</strong>sis at Pusan National University (Aug, 2008).<br />

Kim Ji-Hyeong, “Nation Daily and Sansoo Lee Jong-Ryul,” <strong>The</strong> Historical Re-examination of Sansoo Lee<br />

Jong-Ryul’s National Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory, Seonin, 2006.<br />

Kim Yong-Wook, <strong>The</strong> History and Spirit of Busan1-2, Jeonmang Publishing, 2001.<br />

35 <strong>The</strong> existence and life is the same thing. That is why Lee Jong-Ryul called In-jon-seong and In-eui-neung the ‘both<br />

sides of one existence’.<br />

697<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

<strong>The</strong> Research Institute of National History, National Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory, Deulsam, 1989.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Research Institute of Democratic Society, <strong>The</strong> Historical Re-examination of Sansoo Lee Jong-Ryul’s<br />

National Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory, Seonin, 2006.<br />

Park Man-Joon, “<strong>The</strong> Research on Sansoo Lee Jong-Ryul’s People’s Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory,” <strong>The</strong> Region and<br />

History 18, 2006.<br />

Park Man-Joon, “<strong>The</strong> Historical Philosophy and Ideology of People’s Revolution,” <strong>The</strong> Historical Re-<br />

examination of Sansoo Lee Jong-Ryul’s National Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory, Seonin, 2006.<br />

Park Joon-Gun, “<strong>The</strong> Historical and Philosophical Meaning of March and April Democratic Movements,”<br />

Analysis and Outlook of Korean Democracy, Hangaram, 2000.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Korean Culture Institute at Pusan National University, <strong>The</strong> History and Culture of Busan, Pusan<br />

National University Press, 1998.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Busan Democratic Movement Publication Commission, <strong>The</strong> History of Democratic Movements in<br />

Busan, 1998.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Memorial Foundation of Sansoo Lee Jong-Ryul, Collection of Publications of Sansoo Lee Jong-Ryul<br />

1-2, Deulsam, 2001-2.<br />

Lee Il-Gu (Lee Jong-Ryul), Let’s Look into Gimi, Moorimsa, 1979.<br />

Lee il-Gu (Lee Jong-Ryul), <strong>The</strong> Current Political Issues, International News, 1960.<br />

Lee Jong-Ryul, National Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory, Deulsam, 1989.<br />

Lee Jong-Ryul, <strong>The</strong> Division of Country in History and National unification, Tongmoongwan, 1971.<br />

Jang Dong Pyo, “Sansoo Lee Jong-Ryul’s National Movements and National Revolution <strong>The</strong>ory,” Region<br />

and History 10, 2002.<br />

Choi Jang-Jip et al., Analysis and Outlook of Korean Democracy, Hangaram, 2000.<br />

698


Envisioning a Modern Busan at a Corner of Sanbok Road<br />

Dong Jin Kang<br />

Kyungsung University<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Busan is the oldest modern city of Korea that has a history<br />

of over a hundred years. For the past four to five decades of<br />

rapid growth, Busan has been a place that has been below<br />

average in terms of urban development patterns, which<br />

makes the city look just like other cities.<br />

This process that produces such likeness has caused the<br />

city to lose its unique city identity. Amidst rapid growth,<br />

the system for transmitting tradition to modernity in the<br />

city was destroyed just because it was thought to be old and<br />

meaningless. Many people feel deeply sorry for this reality.<br />

Busan Customs Office destroyed during the Construction<br />

of Busandaegyo Bridge (Destroyed in 1979)<br />

699<br />

Cities Have Trends. <strong>The</strong>y Look Alike.<br />

Even at this right moment, Busan is losing<br />

its past memories bit by bit. <strong>The</strong>y are<br />

vanishing for no reason, and the remaining<br />

memories do not seem to mingle with the<br />

present. Of course, new memories are being<br />

made. But, still the dim old memories that<br />

only Busan has are hard to meet.<br />

Busan should take its own path. No doubt,<br />

the traces and memories of this place<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

made in the 20 th century are the treasures representing the Busan identity. So, it is natural that we have<br />

something meaningful to pass on to future generations in the 21 st and 22 nd centuries.<br />

Busan’s modern history started with the sea. Without the sea, Busan’s modern time would have flown to a<br />

different direction changing the modern history of Korea as a whole. Busan, that is, Busan Port, has a very<br />

close relationship with the sea and mountains. It can be safely said that Busan’s modern history goes along<br />

with the history of Busan Port, though it depends on how one determines the exact boundaries of Busan<br />

Port. Some may limit the port area up to the wharfs and the seaside area. Others may cover the hinterland<br />

of the port and the sea where maritime transportation is made. <strong>The</strong> latter would be the answer.<br />

Center of Modern Busan: Busan Port Area<br />

700<br />

During modern times, Busan experienced<br />

a series of constant plunderage, glory and<br />

shame to and from the sea. This includes<br />

Japanese plunderage since the end of the<br />

Korean Dynasty, the opening of Busanpo<br />

Port for friendly relations with Japan in the<br />

beginning of the 15 th century, war in Busan<br />

during the Japanese invasion in 1592, the<br />

utilization of Busanpo Port as a base to fight<br />

against the Japan, the forced port opening<br />

by Japan, and the utilization of Busan as a logistics base by Japan to conquer the continent. Shortly after<br />

Korea gained independence from Japan, Busan still stood in the middle of modern Korean history as<br />

a destination for fleeing amid the Korean War and the following national rehabilitation and economic<br />

development.<br />

In the center of change in Korea in the 20 th century lies Busan. Whether passive or active in the change,<br />

Busan has been the backbone of Korea’s development in the 21 st century. This is an undeniable truth, and<br />

this makes Busan stand out. This paper also focuses on the features of Busan in terms of space.<br />

2. Modern Busan: Changes in Urban Space<br />

Human settlements in Busan were first made in the Neolithic Age. Busan is still changing regarding its<br />

space, having gone through the Open Port Period, the Japanese Rule, and Korean War. People consider the<br />

first 100 years right after the Open Port Period to be the most influential period in Busan’s development.<br />

But to be exact, we should go back 400 years from now.


It was about the time that the Sea Blockade policy was implemented due to pressure from Myng Dynasty,<br />

China. <strong>The</strong> policy blocked Korea out from other countries. For several hundreds of years, Korea could not<br />

see beyond its seas and was eventually lost in envisioning its future.<br />

Without insightful understanding and vision regarding the sea, Busan’s modern history was in continual<br />

confusion. It was a land of Japanese plunderage and a site for overcoming of uncontrollable national<br />

crises. Its weak ability to quickly overcome the situation shattered its modern history apart like an<br />

unfinished quilted wrapping cloth.<br />

However, as the cloth pieces come into one whole and are closely woven together, Busan’s fragmented<br />

modern history, for sure, can be filled with past memories and traces so that they can cover and cure the<br />

scars of the 20 th century.<br />

2.1.1 <strong>The</strong> Sea Blockade Period and the Open Sea Period (~1945)<br />

In 1407 Jepo and Busanpo Ports were<br />

opened as windows to Japan. Though<br />

they served for trade with Japan, it was<br />

a meaningful opening as it was made<br />

independently. Busan’s port history began<br />

around this time. After the Japanese<br />

Invasions in 1592 and 1597, Busanpo<br />

Port had been the port of Korean prisons<br />

and of Korean envoys to Japan. For two<br />

centuries, from the beginning of the 17 th<br />

century, Choryang Woigwan served as<br />

independence-driven diplomatic and<br />

exchange arena between Korea and Japan.<br />

After that, the site provided the foundation<br />

of Busan’s modern history.<br />

Landscape of Woigwan in the mid-<br />

19th Century (Re-designed Painting<br />

based on the Original Painting by<br />

Byeonbak from Daenaebu Art School<br />

that is re-designed)<br />

701<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

<strong>The</strong> port opening in 1876 was made under pressure, but it was the first official port opening in Korean<br />

history. Also, it made Busan the city of port for international trade and initiated the start of Japanese<br />

plunderage of Korean land.<br />

Until the 1930s, Busan’s modern history was a history of reclamation and flattening of land for space<br />

expansion. In 1883, a port customs office was built followed by the constructions of piers and a bonded<br />

warehouse (one wing), which were registered as Korea’s first maritime projects. For three years from<br />

1909, flattening of the mountain in what is now known as the Daecheong and Jungang-dong area were<br />

implemented. In the flattened area (now Saemadang), large public facilities were constructed, such as<br />

Busan Station and Busan Customs. Also, in the reclaimed area (now Jungang-ro), a neo-modern landscape<br />

including cable cars was formed.<br />

After that, two port construction projects were implemented (first: 1911~1918, second: 1919~1928)<br />

changing the sea map of Busan. <strong>The</strong> first project erected two piers (now Pier 1), which formed a<br />

transportation system for Japanese rule by connecting the piers to the railroad (that is, connecting Busan<br />

Station and Busan Port). Upon completion of reclamation in the 1930s, a bridge (now Yeongdo Bridge)<br />

connecting the islands to the mainland was built to expand the urban area. Near the bridge was Mt.<br />

Yongmisan, which turned into a reclamation site to relocate Busan city government as the hub of politics,<br />

public administration and economy.<br />

2.2 Independence and Post-Korean War Period (1945~1962)<br />

Korea’s independence from Japan brought revitalization to modern Busan. Busan Port became the window<br />

through which Korean expatriates returned to Korea after their forced duties under impressment and<br />

draftings or from overseas independence movements. 1.5 million out of the total 2.5 million expatriates<br />

settled in Busan, but the city suffered hardships due to the lack of infrastructure causing those people to<br />

live in shacks or on streets (the population increased to 150,000 over two years since the independence,<br />

and to 450,000 in 1947).<br />

We can say modern Busan, with the influx of repatriates, had a history of filling towns and undeveloped<br />

areas of the city. Such history went on throughout the course of the Korean War. <strong>The</strong> then-interim national<br />

capital was Busan, and it was filled with people fleeing from elsewhere (refugee camps set up in what is<br />

now Mt. Yongdusan, Mt. Bokbyeongsan, Daecheong—dong, ports, Yeongdo Island, Jeokki, Choryang<br />

and the hillside of Sanbok Road, Beomil-dong areas).<br />

At that time the population was 900,000 (which includes around 500,000 refugees), and those who could<br />

702


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

2.3 Post-City Status Elevation to Direct Government Control (1963~1994)<br />

In 1963, Busan was the second largest city in the country and was elevated to a city directly controlled by<br />

the central government. <strong>The</strong> status change led to the expansion of urban planning areas. In the following<br />

year, the construction of Sanbok Road was completed (now from Choryang and Maryknoll Hospital), and<br />

stripped the refugees’ villages of the notion of illegal residence.<br />

After that, projects improving the quality of life were put in place: notification to change Mt. Yongdusan<br />

Park and Geumgang Park formed under Japanese Rule and other scenic spots (now Taejongdae and<br />

Morundae) into public parks, apartments and Busan Department Mall in Yeongju-dong and Chungmu-<br />

dong. Korean troops were dispatched to Vietnam at Pier 3 for eight years starting from 1964; and the<br />

bascules on Yeongdo Bridge were closed in 1966, both of which are very important in that they changed<br />

the meaning of Busan’s modern history in the 60s.<br />

Sanbok Road, War Refugees’ Shelter (1971)<br />

704<br />

In the 70s and 80s, abundant<br />

government support for constructing<br />

infrastructure brought in prosperity<br />

in Busan. <strong>The</strong> opening of Gyeongbu<br />

Expressway helped Busan Port<br />

develop further into an international<br />

trade gate. Other projects also<br />

contributed to the development<br />

of the port: Namhae Expressway,<br />

Sasang Industrial Complex, Gimhae<br />

Airport, Busan Tower, Piers 5~8, Busandaegyo Bridge, Urban Expressway, etc. This period can be refered<br />

to as the period of space renovation and expansion over the past traces. It was a period of infrastructure for<br />

the industrial foundation of Busan.<br />

2.4 Post-City Status Change to Metropolitan City (1995~)<br />

In the 1990s, Busan experienced the construction of new ports and the relocation of the city government,<br />

which caused the fall of North Port and the Gwangbok and Nampo-dong areas, and the core of modern<br />

Busan. <strong>The</strong> fall was not properly managed and therefore, damaged Busan’s unique modern characteristics.<br />

In 2004 then-president Roh Mu-Hyun ordered a water-friendly waterfront renovation project at the North<br />

Port. People expected the project to keep the port’s uniqueness as Korea’s first open port, but it turned out


to be the completion of the first phase only, which was the reclamation of Piers 1~4 with no hope for the<br />

continuation of the project. <strong>The</strong> old city government complex could have been another modern Busan<br />

place of the past, but it was sold to profit-searching large companies rather than serving as a means of the<br />

modern time, changing into a restored Mt. Yongmisan or connecting Yeongdo Bridge. To sum up, Busan<br />

between the late 90s and the mid-2000s seems to have made little effort to combine its modernism with<br />

urbanism.<br />

On the other hand, the once Japanese Oriental Development Company, which was later used as the<br />

American Embassy, was transformed into the Busan Modern History Museum (2003). <strong>The</strong> Busan<br />

International Film Festival helped Busan acquire a worldwide reputation as a filming location. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

changes provided a chance to re-acknowledge the value of space and landscape of modern Busan. At<br />

the end of the 2000s emerged discussions on the concept of creative city and urban regeneration, which<br />

reviewed the value Sanbok Road had. It was a time of reassuring Busan’s modern features as globally<br />

differentiated assets.<br />

Film Locations in Busan (2000~2008)<br />

3. Space Features of Modern Busan<br />

Over the past century, Busan had gone through unique development. As of September 2012, it is hard<br />

to put in one sentence the impression modern Busan offers. For one, there is a context which cannot be<br />

705<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

precisely defined. Generally, for a city to be recognized as possessing context, it should have a grand<br />

landmark, but Busan does not have one. Moreover, Busan has similar things that are tangled but in not so<br />

much an overwhelming fashion. That is Busan now.<br />

I recently published a column in a cultural journal, saying that the modern image of Busan is ‘the beauty<br />

of groups gathered together.’ Modern Busan is certainly different from other cities in the West where<br />

strong symbolic features are apparent. Rather, Busan has a narrow, long and multi-leveled topography, un-<br />

planned residential areas unprepared for the unexpected war, and ports and piers of different sizes, which<br />

all form the modern image of Busan. Maybe a cultural landscape is closest to describing the city’s image.<br />

Fascinating Gamcheon Village Silhouette at Seongbuk Market<br />

Each feature does not stand out from one another but stay together in groups. That is the most prominent<br />

and valuable difference of modern Busan. For example, there are groups of old houses on the hills,<br />

various industrial heritages including warehouses on ports that support time-honored industries (logistics,<br />

ship-making, fisheries), modern-style shops alongside streets throughout the old downtown area, one or<br />

two-story houses and modern structures found along Sanbok Road and Yeongson Hill, stairways of up<br />

to 186 steps and houses standing shoulder to shoulder on both sides of the stairs, thousands of alleys and<br />

communities and the alley culture in them, infrastructure driving the world’s fifth largest logistics and<br />

transportation industries (railroads, stations, overpasses, tunnels), conventional markets and streets that<br />

have stories and themes of ordinary Busan citizens, large parks of up to 70-year-old history, just to name a<br />

few.<br />

All of them are time-honored assets interconnected with community life, geographical shape and<br />

heights, and urban industries in Busan. <strong>The</strong>y are not enough to be entitled as official cultural assets to be<br />

preserved. <strong>The</strong>y may be swept away under urban development.<br />

<strong>The</strong> reason for this lies within. In the background of modern Busan lie the Japanese Rule and Korean War,<br />

706


all negative attributes.<br />

<strong>The</strong> pre-modern period was forcefully accompanied by the Japanese Rule all through the modern period.<br />

Everything was naturally in chaos. Things created during this time have been destined to be denied.<br />

About 70 years have passed since gaining independence from Japan, about twice as long as the 36 years<br />

of darkness. On the back of this period lies the time of today. If we pull away the previous periods just<br />

because we do not like them in our time, the 70 years will stumble.<br />

Unfortunately, the Korean War that broke out five years after the independence gave us no time to discuss<br />

modern Korea. <strong>The</strong> impoverished shacks were turned into the urban space of Busan. At this point, no one<br />

could deny the equation: out of poverty means into urban development. That way Koreans had to take<br />

urban development solely for development’s sake, not for the restoration to the former condition. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

were no other choices. <strong>The</strong>y became aggressive, not giving a second thought to others and to their own<br />

damage when it comes to urban spacing.<br />

Space characteristics of Busan can be divided into two types.<br />

3.1 Space Type<br />

3.1.1 Ecologically developed urban organizations remain strong.<br />

Busan’s geography is very much unpredictable. <strong>The</strong>re seem to be no fixed frames. People give a mixed<br />

description of Busan as a complicated city or fascinating city. That is especially true when looking at the<br />

old downtown areas where Busan shows its strongest modern features.<br />

Just like the filling and the warp threads in weaving, streets meet streets, and streets meet lands to create a<br />

city. It is called urban fabric. Urban fabric also can be respectively referred to as infill, which means non-<br />

movable infrastructure and other structures, and support which is the opposite of infill.<br />

<strong>The</strong> old downtown and its vicinity have different space types: a rectangle plaid developed from Choryang<br />

Oigwan; a block pattern developed along the long and narrow plain area; mirage-looking alleys developed<br />

in the high lands; and large lands were developed along the ports due to transportation and industry-<br />

friendly environment.<br />

707<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Urban Design of the Old Downtown in Different Patterns and on Different Scale<br />

Topographic Pattern that Looks like a Wriggling Dragon<br />

Those patterns were developed from 300 to 130 years ago. In the patterns, there is a harmony of different<br />

spaces: space left by the Korean War, space of residential types and blocks made amid intensive urban<br />

development, and space of un-renovated communities and their old memories.<br />

<strong>The</strong> multi-leveled topography pattern provides layers of life in multi-levels. <strong>The</strong> rugged topography taught<br />

708


people compliance. Fragmented pieces of land along Sanbok Road and other little roads connecting the<br />

pieces are stretched to the old downtown and ports. <strong>The</strong> winding lines of roads are the patterns of survival<br />

and the joys and sorrows of the people of the city.<br />

As such, from now on, you may not become emotional or romantic as visitors feel when they see the<br />

alleys, slopes of steps, and narrow paths. Now, it is crucial that the renovation of these areas be geared<br />

toward restoring the time-honored patterns focusing on each small pattern’s unique characteristics, not<br />

toward large-scale block making after tearing down everything in the areas.<br />

People often say, “Three thousand stitches cannot beat guide rope” and “Nothing is complete unless you<br />

put it in final shape.” <strong>The</strong>y point out the importance of the main stream or backbone. Instead, it could be<br />

possible that people now hopefully say, “Old alleys make money,” “Old steps remain and life gets better,”<br />

or “If small old houses are well managed, life will turn prosperous.”<br />

3.1.2 Contours are alive.<br />

When one has noticeable looks on his/her face or balanced volume on the sides of the face, we say he/she<br />

has obvious contours of the face. <strong>The</strong> same applies to a city. If the contours of the city are alive, the city<br />

has a three-dimensional effect. This effect is created not by efficient land use and the differentiated usage,<br />

but by the multiple levels in its topography.<br />

Two methods are used to make the three-dimensional effect prominent. One is to erect skyscrapers in<br />

groups so that the skylines significantly fluctuate along the outlines of different sizes of buildings. <strong>The</strong><br />

other is to develop the city without damaging the time-honored structures and the original topography and<br />

geography. In order to maintain the image of modern city, Busan shall take the latter method.<br />

In order for the city contours not to be interrupted, other structures should not block the ridgeline of the<br />

city, and structures should not stand out from one another. <strong>The</strong> steep-sloped hills have slowed down<br />

the city’s economic development pace. <strong>The</strong> economic crisis in the 90s accidentally contributed to the<br />

maintaining of the current ridgelines of the city.<br />

Contour of Modern Busan When Viewed from North Port Renovation Site<br />

709<br />

Session 5


old alleys and hills to a fall as the need for vehicles (parking spaces) and spacious townhouses increased.<br />

<strong>The</strong> living heritages defined in this paper cover the items that are far from today’s life. Most of them are<br />

viewed as uncomfortable, time-consuming, old-fashioned and narrow.<br />

Life in Mountain and on Hill Life at Sea and Port<br />

<strong>The</strong> challenge we have to take now is to catch two rabbits at the same time. We need to preserve the<br />

above-mentioned living heritage, and also, improve all the conditions of the modern time many people<br />

have lived in. Sanbok Road has remained the same ever since its massive transformation back in the<br />

90s when shacks (unregistered) from the past turned into fancy houses and townhouses. This is maybe<br />

because the narrow and steep-sloped alleys do not go with profit-making economic principles.<br />

Such background has changed the renovation of constructing taller and wider buildings into the idea of<br />

regeneration for living together. As a result, Busan is undergoing various projects such as renaissance<br />

in Sanbok Road, happy communities, construction of structures from the modern time in order to bring<br />

modern Busan back to life.<br />

Nonetheless, the end of such movement looks distant. <strong>The</strong> rigid and rigorous lifestyle of the past has<br />

prevented us from changing from quantity to quality, from quick development of hardware to slow<br />

development of software regarding the content and story based welfare and culture.<br />

3.2.2 <strong>The</strong> history of Busan in the modern time matches that of Korea in the same period.<br />

Cities are where people come to live together in harmony. Among others, port cities provide a<br />

wonderful living base for people to live for an affluent future based on lots of resources both in land<br />

and in the sea.<br />

Busan is a city of staple industries first developed in the modern time including fisheries and logistics.<br />

711<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

Although Busan yielded its ship-making and manufacturing industries to Geoje and Gumi, respectively,<br />

it still is on the frontline in logistics and fisheries, which represent the industrial history of Busan and of<br />

Korea.<br />

Closed Namseon Warehouse Should be Restored<br />

712<br />

From modern time Busan’s perspective, its<br />

industrial history has yielded industrial heritage.<br />

This heritage is the sites and facilities of Busan’s<br />

many different industries—agriculture, iron<br />

and steel-making, mining, fisheries, logistics,<br />

manufacturing, ship-making, and more. Most of<br />

the heritage remains in the old downtown and at<br />

the ports. Plants and warehouses which are closed<br />

still remain in their mega-structures. Rather than to<br />

just destroy them, they should be considered as a<br />

preservable industrial heritage, and therefore, renovated into structures that offer urban functions. That is<br />

why they attract attention from home and abroad in terms of reusing and recycling of resources.<br />

<strong>The</strong> modern period in Busan is also represented<br />

by the world’s fifth largest logistics and fisheries,<br />

which recorded a record trade volume of a billion<br />

dollars. For the past ten decades, the industries<br />

we remember enjoyed record prosperity, and<br />

this growth happened where water and land<br />

met. No doubt Busan has invaluable assets.<br />

Learning from the mistakes made in the course<br />

of the development of the North Port, Busan<br />

desperately needs, though time-consuming,<br />

careful decision and consideration in regard to<br />

industrial heritage in logistics, fisheries and ship-<br />

making at South Port.<br />

Closed Namseon Warehouse Should be Restored


4. Conclusion<br />

Busan is located at the southern tip of the Korean peninsula. Amidst the mountain ranges stretching south<br />

from inland lies a network of roads and railroads in and around the city. At the end of the network is the<br />

sea, making Busan the gateway to the world out there. Such a geographical fork has made Busan stand not<br />

on the end but on the cutting edge.<br />

As such, Busan does not feel afraid of the challenges coming from nowhere up front or behind. <strong>The</strong> front<br />

blocked by the tangled mountains has given the city resilience to overcome unexpected challenges; the sea<br />

has made the city dream of infinity. However, at the same time, the city often fell into self-complacency<br />

and passiveness, and the lack of opportunities to be compared with others discouraged the city from<br />

developing based on liberty.<br />

Fortunately, the world is changing. <strong>The</strong> world now makes cities change to have self-management and<br />

self-protection. Having an edge that differentiates a city from others is considered a great virtue in city<br />

development. Busan also stands in line with this trend, gradually restoring its characteristics from its<br />

modern time.<br />

<strong>The</strong> aim should be to identify the roles Busan played for Korea in the 20 th century and the memories and<br />

traces Busan left so that they can regain their own space and original functions. <strong>The</strong>y will push Busan<br />

forward to entering the time of renovation.<br />

As such, two suggestions can be made. First, it is necessary to establish the Busan Modernity Preservation<br />

Foundation. Historical cities everywhere, not only in Korea but in other countries, are pleasant and<br />

rememberable places to visit not only because they have many cultural assets, but because they have<br />

the atmosphere and landscape that local people and surrounding nature make in harmony. <strong>The</strong>refore,<br />

identifying more means of memory and traces of modern Busan will transform Busan into a new modern<br />

Busan.<br />

In order for this to happen, Busan’s modernity should continue to be identified and preserved. <strong>The</strong> marks<br />

and traces of the past modern Busan and its potential should be identified and listed. This should include<br />

not only the current cultural assets but also many other small things: various worn-out historical structures,<br />

old roads, souvenirs, sites, industrial heritage, peculiar cultural sceneries, figures and arts, monumental<br />

accidents, old forests and street trees-which should be archived. At the same time, multi-faceted<br />

renovation projects should follow to turn them into new traces and memories of the city. <strong>The</strong> projects<br />

include restoration, preservation, improvement and maintenance, renovation, expansion, relocation and<br />

713<br />

Session 5


<strong>The</strong> 2 nd <strong>World</strong> <strong>Humanities</strong> <strong>Forum</strong><br />

Proceedings<br />

change of usage.<br />

This is not an easy task. Things should be considered as to who should do it and how the needed funds<br />

should be raised, because the existing public institutions and civil organizations alone cannot handle<br />

it. That is why the above-mentioned foundation should be established. With the foundation, Busan’s<br />

modernity will be viewed rightly.<br />

Second, it is necessary to introduce the concept of Busan Future Heritage. Things change rapidly. It may<br />

not be always viewed negatively. What makes Korea strong is the people’s driving force and unity, which<br />

are rooted in the Korean culture of rapidity. One side effect of this culture is that sometimes, valuable<br />

things are missed. Since the 1960s, things have been development-oriented. Change will continue, and<br />

development trends will also continue to outpace preservation movements for some time.<br />

On the other hand, what journalist Jane Jacobs and urban anthropoligist Lewis Mumford noted 50 years<br />

ago is becoming a reality. <strong>The</strong>ir statements have some keywords: local, small things, local culture,<br />

cultural industry, creative cities, low-rise, old buildings, people, urban emotions, walking, borderlines,<br />

multiple stories, low-rise and high-density, location features, semi-public space, regeneration, community,<br />

neighborhood, alleys between houses, and urban history. All of them are directly and indirectly related<br />

to what Busan is pursuing and should pursue. Among them, Busan Future Heritage will be one that will<br />

preserve things which may possibly vanish and should be passed on to the future generations.<br />

Though some of them may not be valuable enough to earn the title of heritage, possible candidates are<br />

as follows: winding Sanbok Road, the site of crane groups at Jaseongdae Port, Sailo at Yanggok Port,<br />

Yeongdo Bridge, Busandaegyo Bridge, Gukje Market, Gupo Market, an array of used books shops in<br />

Bosu-dong, 40-step stairway and nearby stairs, 186-step stairway, alleys in the old downtown, Gongdong<br />

Fish Market at dawn, docks of Hanjin Heavy Industry Co., Gudeok Gym, Jeroi Lighthouse, seawalls and<br />

bonded warehouses at South Port, Pier 1, Pier 2, woman merchants in Jagalchi Market, port stew, dried<br />

seafood stands in Jagalchi Market, sashimi, grilled mackerels, wheat noodles, Busan Tower, food stands<br />

in Nampo-dong, Baekgudang Bakery, Halmae noodles, green onion pan-fries in Dongnae, Sanseong rice<br />

wine, nuts pancakes at BIFF Square, sunset at Daedaepo Beach, sunrise at the sea near Songjeong, the<br />

island full of camellia flowers, Nakdonggang River, Gwangadaegyo Bridge, closed sections of Donghae<br />

Nambu railway, Gudeok Stadium, UN Park, Mt. Yongdusan Park, Taejongdae, Yigidae, Haeundae Beach,<br />

Hongtipo inlet, Jangrimpo inlet, Cheongsapo inlet, Gudeokpo inlet, Jeungsan, Yeongju East Tunnel,<br />

overpass in Munhyeon, Busan Civil Park (to be established), hot springs in Dongnae, Baeksan Sanghoi<br />

(restored), Namseon Warehouse (restored), Baekje Hospital, cultural village in Gamcheon, Maejukjo<br />

Village, Anchang Village, Mt. Bokbyeongsan, Gwannam-ro, Daebyeon Port, anchovies and seaweed in<br />

714


Gijang, etc.<br />

<strong>The</strong> above heritages may not have significant economical effects, but will serve as a way to go back in<br />

time to remember modern Busan many years ago. <strong>The</strong>y remain to be evaluated and better appreciated by<br />

the citizens of Busan.<br />

Modern Busan in the past will no long be remembered negatively and as an inconvenience. Modern<br />

Busan today will be attractive based on creativeness and grace. Future heritages will be the infrastructure<br />

of blessing that gives meaning to the existence of Busan and its new prosperity in the future.<br />

References<br />

Jo Seong Tae Kang Dong Jin 2009. “Analysis on Change of Shoreline of Busan Port”. Urban Design<br />

Institute of Korea Journal 10-4, pp. 249~265.<br />

Cha Chulwook 2011. “War and Busan People: What the War Left Behind”. Lecture on studies on Busan:<br />

studies on Busan, Meet on the road. Lecture material.<br />

Choi Hae Gun 2001. My Love, Sea of Busan. Busan: Busan Metropolitan City.<br />

715<br />

Session 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!