I'r - Memorial University of Newfoundland

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure :!.1.2 The Great Lakes profile . Note: I. The profile is taken along the long axes of the lakes; 2. The vertical exaggeration is 2000 times; 3. Lake surface elevations are given above sea level and maximum depths are below lake surface; 4. Inter-lake lock and river syste ms are numbered to corre spond to map in Figure 2.1.1. (After Fuller and Shear, 1995.)
;: Duluth Chicago 1 J Lake Superior t Lake Michigan - SEA LEVEl ( 1a; St. MarysRiver 183.2 m 178.0 m lb) Straitsof Mackinac J 176.0 m CD SI. Clair River Lake St. Clair Detroit River J Lake Lake Erie Huron , -----1------ 173.5 m ( 3' Niagara River Weiland Canal 84m - 282 m 229 m Lake Ontario 406m 1 74.2m 244 m • Upper Lakes --.'.--- Lower Lakes • 4 51. Lawren ce River J
Page 3: POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN
Page 6 and 7: composition. Portions ofthe lake th
Page 8 and 9: TABLE OF CONTENTS . ABSTRAcr._._ _
Page 10: 6. CONCLUSIONS_._ _....._._._ _ ._
Page 13 and 14: FIGURE 3.104 CONfIGURATION OF ISOCH
Page 15 and 16: FIGURE 4 .2.12 SAMPLES AND PROMINEN
Page 17 and 18: fIGURE 5.3.1 DESCR1Pl1VE MODEL OF S
Page 19 and 20: APPENDIX B 3 _ T HEoerwt Of A PtUNC
Page 21 and 22: Ip » Ideno(l,2.3 cd)pyrene NIST =
Page 23: Figure L 1.1 The 16 parental polycy
Page 26 and 27: After release by the primary source
Page 28: decomposition processes (O'Malley e
Page 32: Figure 2.1.1 The Great Lakes draina
Page 38 and 39: are the Black River, the Cuyaho ga
Page 41: Figure 1.1.5 The pattern of permane
Page 45 and 46: sedimentary basins, Western. Centra
Page 48: Figure 2. 1.8 Summer (July) air and
Page 52: Natural Resources: The lower Great
Page 57 and 58: American waters under the current U
Page 60 and 61: continuously overflowed com bined s
Page 63 and 64: 3.1 EXPERIMENTAL 3. METHODS 3.1.1 S
Page 66 and 67: Table 3,1.1 Locations and types ofs
Page 68: Figure 3.12 Extraction and purifica
Page 72 and 73: hexane. 2) the unsaturated aliphati
Page 75: this problem. Ratios ofthe two stab
Page 78: Figure 3. 1.4 Configuration ofIsoch
Page 82 and 83: 3.2.1 UNl- AND BIVAJUATE METHODS Th
Page 84:
f igure 3.2. 1 Mean and range (± s
Page 87 and 88:
utilized the same instrument (Isoch
Page 90 and 91:
Selecting lIt1J'iahlu: It was demon
Page 92 and 93:
w- _ 71
Page 95 and 96:
seven variables with fewer missing
Page 97 and 98:
analysis also employed a greate r n
Page 99:
description. The second cluster ana
Page 104 and 105:
elationships between different site
Page 107:
Figure 4.1.3 Regression ofthree fir
Page 112:
Figure 4.[.5 Isotopic composition (
Page 116:
Figure 4.1.6 Weights ofvariables (c
Page 120:
Figure 4.1.8 Distri bution ofsample
Page 123 and 124:
those at the majority ofstations. S
Page 126 and 127:
Ion, 969, 971, 357, 358). In additi
Page 129:
Figure 4.2.3 Samples and prominent
Page 132 and 133:
analysis supported some ofthc previ
Page 135 and 136:
, ", Is , , >\ ryr " II ,- - , I ,
Page 137 and 138:
11'
Page 139:
sources (Fi g. 4.2 .5c). This compo
Page 143:
Figure 4.2.7 The relative contribut
Page 146 and 147:
".1.1.2 Miring CllrIIU (isotopic co
Page 149:
Figure 42.9 Samples and promin ent
Page 153:
Page 157:
Figure 4.2. 13 Samples and prominen
Page 161:
Page 165:
Page 168 and 169:
It is difficult to differentiate be
Page 170 and 171:
Figure 4.2.18 Weights ofvariables (
Page 172:
Figure 42.19 Distribution ofsamples
Page 175 and 176:
5.1 SPATIAL DI STRIBUTION s. DISCUS
Page 177:
f igure 5.1.1 Zones coinciding with
Page 180:
f igure 5. 1.2 Average and range (
Page 184:
Figure 5.1.4 Zones (clusters) in th
Page 187:
Figure 5.1.5 Direction ofthe mean s
Page 191 and 192:
The location ofthe third station at
Page 193:
Figure 5.1.7 Station locations and
Page 197:
Page 201 and 202:
5.1.4 and Section 4.1.2). This clus
Page 204:
Figure 5.1.1 1 Statioo locations an
Page 208 and 209:
unaffected by the contaminated flow
Page 211 and 212:
this station is die clo$esf to the
Page 213 and 214:
samples and sources (Fig. 52.1 and
Page 216 and 217:
There is yet another observation po
Page 218 and 219:
with the relative contribution ofdi
Page 221 and 222:
Table S.l.1 Six dusters identified
Page 224 and 225:
the three previous ly identified zo
Page 226:
Page 229 and 230:
contribution from petroleum related
Page 231 and 232:
(Fig. 4.2.7). Finally. this site co
Page 233 and 234:
Snow melt and sewer releases seem t
Page 235 and 236:
importance ofcombustion-derived PAR
Page 237 and 238:
Intens ity o(degradation (the South
Page 239 and 240:
where this importance is somewhat r
Page 241:
Figure 5.2.5 Station tocatices andz
Page 244 and 245:
:2 for molecular composition assume
Page 247 and 248:
ange of Slatistica1 variat ion of t
Page 249:
Figure 5.].1 Descriptive model ofso
Page 252 and 253:
conveyed into the river through dir
Page 254 and 255:
molecular composition. Its applicat
Page 256 and 257:
Canton L. and Grimal t 1. O. (1992)
Page 258 and 259:
Howell E. T., Marvin C. H., Bilyea
Page 260 and 261:
Olson F. C. W. (l950) The currents
Page 263 and 264:
Willett P. (1981) Similarity and cl
Page 266:
t Apprndb AI. [cout.) bl S,.lioD A<
Page 271 and 272:
Appendill A6. The two-component mas
Page 273:
Appendix A7. (cont.) Xl. = X llVt r
Page 277:
• ass
Page 281:
Appendix 82. (cont.)
Page 285:
Appendix IU. (cant.) oj Tue Dec 24
Page 290:
AppendiI C3. (cont.) Coo c.eo lrati
show all

I'r - Memorial University of Newfoundland

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?