18.07.2013 Views

court of appeal criminal appeal no: q-05-123-2009 between

court of appeal criminal appeal no: q-05-123-2009 between

court of appeal criminal appeal no: q-05-123-2009 between

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6<br />

(c) that at the time <strong>of</strong> the commission <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence, their ages<br />

were in this order;<br />

(i) the first appellant was 18 years 6 months and 3 days old;<br />

(ii) the second appellant, a child <strong>of</strong>fender, was 16 years 11<br />

months and 27 days old;<br />

(iii) the third appellant was 19 years 6 months and 21 days<br />

old; and<br />

(iv) the fourth appellant was 23 years 3 months and 8 days<br />

old.<br />

(d) that they all came from poor family backgrounds and had <strong>no</strong><br />

proper education:<br />

(i) the first appellant attended school up to primary six at<br />

Sekolah Kebangsaan Beladin;<br />

(ii) the second appellant, a child <strong>of</strong>fender, did <strong>no</strong>t go to school<br />

at all;<br />

(iii) the third appellant attended school up to Form 5 at<br />

Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Santubong; and<br />

(iv) the fourth appellant attended school up to primary six at<br />

Sekolah Kebangsaan Beladin.<br />

[11] We also considered the probation reports prepared by Encik<br />

Norazman bin Abdul Rahim from the welfare <strong>of</strong>fice at Kuching, Sarawak

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!