court of appeal criminal appeal no: q-05-123-2009 between
court of appeal criminal appeal no: q-05-123-2009 between
court of appeal criminal appeal no: q-05-123-2009 between
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
6<br />
(c) that at the time <strong>of</strong> the commission <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence, their ages<br />
were in this order;<br />
(i) the first appellant was 18 years 6 months and 3 days old;<br />
(ii) the second appellant, a child <strong>of</strong>fender, was 16 years 11<br />
months and 27 days old;<br />
(iii) the third appellant was 19 years 6 months and 21 days<br />
old; and<br />
(iv) the fourth appellant was 23 years 3 months and 8 days<br />
old.<br />
(d) that they all came from poor family backgrounds and had <strong>no</strong><br />
proper education:<br />
(i) the first appellant attended school up to primary six at<br />
Sekolah Kebangsaan Beladin;<br />
(ii) the second appellant, a child <strong>of</strong>fender, did <strong>no</strong>t go to school<br />
at all;<br />
(iii) the third appellant attended school up to Form 5 at<br />
Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Santubong; and<br />
(iv) the fourth appellant attended school up to primary six at<br />
Sekolah Kebangsaan Beladin.<br />
[11] We also considered the probation reports prepared by Encik<br />
Norazman bin Abdul Rahim from the welfare <strong>of</strong>fice at Kuching, Sarawak