19.07.2013 Views

??/?? - ?????- ??????

??/?? - ?????- ??????

??/?? - ?????- ??????

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

18(1), 9-34.<br />

20. Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper & Row.<br />

21. Henning-Thurau, T. & Klee, A. (1997). The impact of customer satisfaction and<br />

relationship quality on customer retention: A critical reassessment and model<br />

development. Psychology & Marketing, 14(8), 737-764.<br />

22. Jones, T.O. & Sasser, Jr. W.E. (1995). Why satisfied customer defect. Harvard<br />

Business Review, 37(6), 88-99.<br />

23. Keating, B., Rugimbana, R., & Quazi, A. (2003). Differentiating between service<br />

quality and relationship quality in cyberspace. Managing Service Quality, 13(3),<br />

217-232.<br />

24. Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing Management. (11th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.<br />

25. Kumar, N., Scheer, L.K. & Steenkamp, J.E.M. (1995). The effects of supplier fairness<br />

on vulnerable reseller. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 54-65.<br />

26. Lawn M. (1991). Social constructions of quality in teaching. Evaluation and research<br />

in education, 5(1-2), 67-77.<br />

27. Lee, M. & Cunningham, L.F. (2001). A cost/benefit approach to understanding service<br />

loyalty. Journal of service marketing, 15, 113-130.<br />

28. Lovelock, C. H. (1983). Classifying services to gain strategic marketing insights.<br />

Journal of Marketing, 47, 9-22.<br />

29. Marsh, H. W. (1982). SEEQ: A reliable, valid, and useful instrument for collecting<br />

students’ evaluations of university teaching. British of Educational Psychology, 52,<br />

77-95.<br />

30. Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Research findings,<br />

methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of<br />

Educational Psychology, 11(3), 253-388.<br />

31. Marsh, H.W. (1991). Multidimensional students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness:<br />

98

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!