OTTO LINNE PREIS - luchterhandt

More documents

Recommendations

Info

1. Introduction and Aims The intention behind the Otto Linne Award is to reward designs which develop a forward-looking attitude to urban landscape architecture. Following the reinstatement of the award in 2009, for which young landscape architects were required to come to grips with a complex situation where Hamburg- Altona slopes down to the Elbe, the brief for the 2011 Otto Linne Award calls into question the classic limitations of landscape architecture and focuses on Rothenburgsort district’s “Stadttor Südost” (the south-east ‘gateway’ to the city) and the area round the mouth of the Bille river - a site where there is a massive overlapping of issues involving traffic planning, the built environment, urban development and, of course, open space planning. More than hitherto, it is hoped that the Otto Linne Award will encourage designers to take a long, hard look at the principles and conceivable perspectives of urban landscape architecture. The intention is that work on the issues raised by this part of Hamburg will spark a high-calibre debate in professional circles, stimulate controversial ideas and find new images which make the process clear. To “provoke” those entering for Otto Linne Award into producing innovative, surprising approaches to a solution, the issues and project brief have not been closely defined. Specifically, the jury is not looking for feasible designs which must correspond with the stated objectives. Rather it is the task of the competition entrants to identify the challenges of this location themselves and to develop their own project brief – relating to the specific place selected and with a view to stating a general position on the profession of “landscape architect” now and in future. The challenge of the 2011 Otto Linne Award For the Otto Linne Award in 2011 the sponsors have deliberately chosen not to narrowly define the issues to be addressed or the associated review area, in order to promote entrants’ creativity. Competitors should enter into a dialogue with the location, soak up its atmosphere and at the same time reflect on the nature of forward-looking, urban landscape architecture and how it might be adopted for the area around the mouth of the Bille. Just as Otto Linne, himself a pioneer accustomed to thinking outside the box, would have liked. The sponsors are convinced that the entrants will submit forward-looking, creative answers which will allow them to embark on a fresh debate about urban landscape architecture. 4
2. Otto Linne Award: aspirations and perspectives Following questions are intended to illustrate the goal to which the Otto Linne Award for Urban Landscape Architecture aspires and describe the perspectives: • What issues are currently associated with future-oriented landscape and open space planning? • Which methods and procedures seem likely, from the landscape architect’s point of view, to provide convincing answers to the recognized challenges of climate change, consumption of resources, information overload, rapid obsolescence, an aging population and an increasing diversity of lifestyles? • In what direction could and should the professional profile of the modern landscape architect develop? What role/position might planners take? • Which media seem to offer suitable ways of communicating contemporary landscape architecture to a range of different actors and encouraging them to contribute or become involved? The Otto Linne Award invites a debate on the perspectives adopted by professional landscape architects. It is hoped that the entries will spark a debate about the ways in which the job of the urban landscape architect has changed over the last few decades and how the profession should or must develop. 5
Page 1: OTTO LINNE PREIS für urbane Landsc
Page 6 and 7: 3. Sponsors Ministry of Urban Devel
Page 8 and 9: 4. Information about the review are
Page 10 and 11: 4.1 City districts/usages Hammerbro
Page 12 and 13: The preferred uses for plots of lan
Page 14 and 15: Outer Hammerbrook To the east the o
Page 16 and 17: “It could be that intermediate sp
Page 18 and 19: 4.2 Traffic Flows and Structures Ro
Page 20 and 21: 4.3 Water bodies The Elbe The Elbe,
Page 22 and 23: 4.4 Green Areas/Spaces The review a
Page 24 and 25: Since 1997 the landscape programme
Page 26 and 27: Open space planning competition for
Page 28 and 29: 4.5 Current Plans/Prospects Study o
Page 30 and 31: Scenario: “Office city 2.0.” -
Page 32 and 33: The site of the piggyback rail stat
Page 34 and 35: “… what remains! It is spring.
Page 36 and 37: 5. Project Brief There has been a d
Page 38 and 39: South-east entrance to the city The
Page 40 and 41: 40 Mouth of the Bille
Page 42 and 43: 6. Otto Linne - One of Hamburg`s ma
Page 44 and 45: 7. Photo Documentation 44 1 2 3 5 4
Page 46 and 47: 46 13 6 7 Amsinckstraße and traffi
Page 48 and 49: 48 16 19 Brandshofer Deich and Bill
Page 50 and 51: 50 CitySouth in the city district o
Page 52 and 53: 8. Procedure 1. Sponsors igs intern
Page 54 and 55:
4. Type of procedure The competitio
Page 56 and 57:
Substitute members: • Uli Hellweg
Page 58 and 59:
11. Announcement of the competition
Page 60 and 61:
14. Assessment criteria 60 • Orig
Page 62 and 63:
18. Deadline for submission Works c
Page 64 and 65:
Imprint Editor igs internationale g
Page 66:
igs internationale gartenschau hamb
show all

OTTO LINNE PREIS - luchterhandt

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?