The Cosmic Flows project : voyage to the Great Attractor - LUTH
The Cosmic Flows project : voyage to the Great Attractor - LUTH
The Cosmic Flows project : voyage to the Great Attractor - LUTH
Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Cosmic</strong> <strong>Flows</strong> <strong>project</strong> : <strong>voyage</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Attrac<strong>to</strong>r<br />
Hélėne Cour<strong>to</strong>is<br />
Ass. Prof University of Lyon, France<br />
Research associate, Institute for Astronomy, Hawaii, USA<br />
Worshop Structure of <strong>the</strong> Universe, Obs Paris Nov 28, 2012
2D 3D 4D<br />
Cosmography : mapping with dynamics.<br />
Cosmology question : what is <strong>the</strong> cause of <strong>the</strong> CMB motion at 630 km/s?
<strong>The</strong> large scale cosmic flows constraints on neutrinos<br />
V expansion = H 0 * distance + V peculiar<br />
Peculiar velocities are only due <strong>to</strong> gravitational interactions.<br />
Our Galaxy has high deviant motion of 630 km/s w.r.t. <strong>the</strong> CMB dipole (Fixsen et al. 1996)<br />
Decomposition in<strong>to</strong> components:<br />
- Infall <strong>to</strong>wards Virgo cluster at 16 Mpc: ~ 140 km/s (Karachentsev et al. 2010)<br />
- Motion away from a large Local Void (Tully, Cour<strong>to</strong>is et al. 2008)<br />
- <strong>Great</strong> Attrac<strong>to</strong>r at ~ 50 Mpc (Lilje et al. 1986; Lynden-Bell et al. 1988)<br />
- Perseus/Pisces cluster at <strong>the</strong> opposite side (Hanski et al. 2001)<br />
- Shapley concentration at ~ 150 Mpc ?(Pike & Hudson 2005; Erdoğdu et al. 2006; Bilicki et<br />
al. 2011)<br />
Observed components cannot explain <strong>the</strong> flow? (Lavaux et al. 2010; Nusser & Davis 2011;<br />
Cour<strong>to</strong>is et al. 2012)
SFI++<br />
Masters, Springob, Haynes, Giovanelli,<br />
2006 ApJ 653, 861<br />
Kraan-Korteweg, 2011, arXiv1107.1069<br />
We are traveling with <strong>the</strong> Local Sheet as a unit<br />
<strong>The</strong> Local Sheet is a wall bounding <strong>the</strong> Local Void which is pushing us away<br />
Edge-on <strong>to</strong> Supergalactic plane<br />
Tully, Cour<strong>to</strong>is et al. 2008 ApJ 676, 184
2004 : Advent of <strong>the</strong> new giant radiotelescopes : GBT, Arecibo refurbished, Parkes mulGbeam<br />
2006-‐2008 : catalog of 1,800 accurate galaxy distances: cosmicflows-‐1<br />
median error on <strong>the</strong> peculiar velociGes 13%<br />
2012 : cosmicflows-‐2 with 7,000 distances up <strong>to</strong> 80 Mpc<br />
(more than 1,000 hrs at GBT and 200 hrs at Parkes, 30 nights at UH2.2m, 1,800 poinGngs with Spitzer)<br />
Radioastronomy : D. Makarov, I. Karachentsev, S. Mitronova, B. Koribalski, R. Kraan-‐Korteweg<br />
Pho<strong>to</strong>metry ground + Spitzer + WISE : E. Shaya, T. Jarre^, M. Seibert, W. Freedman, B. Madore, E. Persson, K. Sheth<br />
Analysis : S. Go^loeber, Y. Hoffman, G. Yepes, D. Pomarede<br />
PhD Students B. Jacobs, M. Zagurski (USA), B. Depardon, N. Bonhomme, T. Doumler, J. Sorce (Lyon)
Observational methods :<br />
Distances = Peculiar velociGes<br />
V CMB = H 0 * d + V pec<br />
expansion gravitation<br />
V CMB : redshift surveys : only luminous matter, short range correlations<br />
V pec : peculiar velocities : trace full gravitational field : luminous + dark matter, no bias,<br />
long-range correlated fields<br />
Nearby 10 Mpc : Cepheids, Tip red giant branch (TRGB), Surface Brightness Fluctuations (SBF)<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>r up <strong>to</strong> 200 Mpc :<br />
- SNIa : current data <strong>to</strong>o sparse, few hundreds in 8,000 km/s radius<br />
- Fundamental Plane: early types galaxies, in high density regions, not suitable for tracing <strong>the</strong><br />
flows, current data quite unreliable (6DF), half-sky<br />
- Tully-Fisher : inclined spiral galaxies, tracing <strong>the</strong> field where <strong>the</strong> eddy currents are displayed,<br />
high data number (several 10,000), distance accuracy < 15% and improving, all sky<br />
Very difficult <strong>to</strong> obtain : 2 accurate deep observations : pho<strong>to</strong>metry + radioastronomy
2008 : <strong>Cosmic</strong>flows-‐1<br />
2012 : <strong>Cosmic</strong>flows-‐2<br />
Cour<strong>to</strong>is et al. AJ, 2009, 138, 1938<br />
Cour<strong>to</strong>is et al. 2011 MNRAS 415,1935<br />
Sorce et al. arXiv:1208.3311 , arXiv:1208.3309<br />
Status of Current observaGonal surveys<br />
Data expands :<br />
Deep I band exposures (UH 2.2m) + HST + Spitzer<br />
Deep HI exposures, NRAO large program<br />
(+1,000 hrs GBT, Parkes, 200 nights/yr )
Simulated Universe CLUES<br />
Full 3D velocity<br />
Full 3D density<br />
TesGng <strong>the</strong> Wiener Filter reconstrucGon method<br />
Zaroubi et al. 1999 ApJ 520,413<br />
Cour<strong>to</strong>is et al. 2012 ApJ 744,43<br />
Doumler et al. accepted MNRAS 2012<br />
Smoo<strong>the</strong>d at 10 Mpc<br />
Mock catalog : 1,800 radial velocities<br />
5-25% error, median 15%<br />
within 3,000 km/s<br />
…<br />
WF reconstruction:<br />
--> 3D vec<strong>to</strong>rs<br />
--> Full density
Results from cosmicflows-‐1 in 2012: Expulsion from <strong>the</strong> Local Void.<br />
SGY-SGZ plane<br />
Cour<strong>to</strong>is et al, in prep
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Great</strong> A^rac<strong>to</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> XY plane<br />
Results from cosmicflows-‐1 in 2012:<br />
Reconstructed ma^er density (luminous + dark ma^er) versus galaxy catalog
Results from cosmicflows-‐1 in 2012:<br />
Reconstructed ma^er density (luminous + dark ma^er) versus galaxy catalog
Results from cosmicflows-‐1 in 2012: Pushing <strong>the</strong> limits: outside <strong>the</strong> data-‐zone<br />
Full Matter<br />
Div Tidal<br />
Cour<strong>to</strong>is et al. 2012 ApJ 744,43<br />
• <strong>Great</strong> Attrac<strong>to</strong>r : direction<br />
outside <strong>the</strong> zone of<br />
avoidance<br />
• Some remaining tidal longrange<br />
velocity field ~ 90<br />
km/s
Results from cosmicflows-‐1 in 2012: MRI or <strong>to</strong>mography of <strong>the</strong> Universe
Status of constrained simulaGons: http://www.clues-<strong>project</strong>.org/<br />
2009 : CLUES-‐1 using MARKIII+SBF+Karachentsev peculiar velociGes<br />
2012 : CLUES-‐2 using cosmicflows-‐1 : 2,000 (20+%) all-‐sky 40 Mpc<br />
2014 : CLUES-‐3 using cosmicflows-‐2 : 7,000 (10%) all-‐sky 100 Mpc<br />
improvements on how <strong>to</strong> implement <strong>the</strong> constraints in <strong>the</strong> IniGal condiGons : RZA<br />
SimulaGons will contain Shapley, Peculiar Velocity Data will predict Shapley super-‐cluster<br />
Do we reach <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> cosmic flow mo2on <strong>to</strong>wards <strong>the</strong> CMB?<br />
<strong>Great</strong><br />
Attrac<strong>to</strong>r<br />
CLUES-1 : 180 Mpc box<br />
Virgo<br />
Perseus
Constraint simulations using peculiar<br />
velocities in <strong>the</strong> Initial Conditions:<br />
WF + <strong>the</strong> back in time machine RZA
SGY [Mpc/h]<br />
160<br />
140<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
GA<br />
Test re-‐simulaGons at z=0, box 160 Mpc/h Doumler et al. Accepted MNRAS 2012<br />
COMA<br />
LSC<br />
30<br />
60<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160<br />
SGX [Mpc/h]<br />
Original simulation full box<br />
PP<br />
log(δ+1)<br />
BOX160 2.5<br />
Y [Mpc/h]<br />
Y [Mpc/h]<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110<br />
C30_10_II_A -0.5 (with RZA)<br />
Original simulation<br />
X [Mpc/h]<br />
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110<br />
X [Mpc/h]<br />
Y [Mpc/h]<br />
Y [Mpc/h]<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
C30_10_I_A (without RZA)<br />
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110<br />
Re-simulation X [Mpc/h] no RZA<br />
E60_10_II_A (with RZA)<br />
Re-simulation with a CF1 mock Re-simulation with a CF2 mock<br />
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110<br />
X [Mpc/h]<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0
CLUES 2<br />
A simulation of <strong>the</strong> Local Universe using cosmicflows-1 peculiar velocities as initial<br />
conditions (+WMAP7) with direct comparison <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> observed galaxy distribution (black<br />
dots) : only CDM.<br />
Preliminary results (last week) Sorce, Cour<strong>to</strong>is and CLUES collab<br />
nd generation<br />
What happens if we add a « pinch » of HDM<br />
or even if we try <strong>to</strong> revisit some WDM models ?<br />
Tikhonov et al. 2009, MNRAS 399, 1611<br />
WDM 1keV
CLUES 2 nd generation, some preliminary validity tests<br />
- Virgo Mass : 8 out on 10 simulations gives us a good Virgo at ~7-9.10^14 Msol in accordance with<br />
observational measurements of <strong>the</strong> Virgo Mass ~ 8.10^14 Msol<br />
- Peculiar velocities looks in accordance with <strong>the</strong> observations: amplitude and gaussianity<br />
<strong>the</strong>se tests are not final , run higher resolution simulations in order <strong>to</strong> check <strong>the</strong> halo numbers, masses etc ..<br />
Preliminary results , Sorce, Cour<strong>to</strong>is and CLUES collab<br />
Valageas arxiv1206.0554
Preliminary results (yesterday)<br />
Comparison between <strong>the</strong> average on 10 simulations and <strong>the</strong> observations: offset on <strong>the</strong><br />
Virgo cluster position : X+1, Y+1.5, Z+2.8 Mpc/h<br />
could be due <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Non-Linear part of <strong>the</strong> peculiar motions : this is a well-known<br />
limitation of our WF+RZA code, that could be covered by a coupling with a Lagrangian<br />
perturbation <strong>the</strong>ory method<br />
we also need <strong>to</strong> check for <strong>the</strong> effect of shear and tidal field on <strong>the</strong> IC
CLUES 2 nd generation<br />
A simulation of <strong>the</strong> Local Universe using cosmicflows-1 peculiar velocities as initial<br />
conditions (+WMAP7) with direct comparison <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> observed galaxy distribution (white<br />
dots) : only CDM.<br />
Preliminary results (yesterday) Sorce, Cour<strong>to</strong>is and CLUES collab
CLUES Structure Formation with cold and warm Dark Matter http://www.clues-<strong>project</strong>.org/<br />
Evolution of <strong>the</strong> gas density in <strong>the</strong> Local Group for CDM (left) and WDM (right), 4096^3 resimulation,<br />
from z=41 <strong>to</strong> z=0. same color table and density scale was used.<br />
Cosmological Parameters<br />
Species WDM, 1 keV<br />
L box 64 Mpc/h<br />
Ω Λ 0.76<br />
Ω m 0.24<br />
Ω bar 0.0418<br />
h 0.73<br />
σ 8 0.75<br />
N 0.95<br />
Iseed 186592<br />
Spectrum EisHu approximation with an<br />
exponential cut-off according <strong>to</strong> a 1keV WDM<br />
particle
What is causing <strong>the</strong> tidal flow after 80 Mpc ?<br />
<strong>The</strong> Local Void in <strong>the</strong> YZ plane
Status of Current observaGonal surveys :<br />
<strong>Cosmic</strong>flows-‐2 : Data ready 11,000 galaxies with accurate HI / 8,000 galaxies with deep I band and NIR Spitzer<br />
+ inclinaGon + pathological cases 5,000 thrown away ….<br />
40 Mpc 100 Mpc<br />
1,800 cosmicflows-‐1 at 15% ~ 7,000 galaxy distances at < 10% (~ 2000 GBT)<br />
Peculiar Velocity Data include <strong>Great</strong> A>rac<strong>to</strong>r,<br />
reconstruc2on predicts Shapley?<br />
2008 2012
<strong>Cosmic</strong>flows-2 : TFR calibration in I band and 3.6 microns “L” band<br />
Tully and Cour<strong>to</strong>is, 2012 ApJ 749, 78<br />
Cour<strong>to</strong>is and Tully, 2012 ApJ, 749, 174<br />
H 0 = 75.9 ± 3.8 km.s −1 Mpc −1<br />
Sorce et al. 2012 AJ 144, 133<br />
Sorce et al. 2012 ApJ 758, 12
Preliminary results from cosmicflows-2 in 2013 : Reconstructed matter density<br />
(luminous + dark matter) versus galaxy catalog<br />
Coma<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Great</strong> A^rac<strong>to</strong>r<br />
Perseus-‐Pisces<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Great</strong> A^rac<strong>to</strong>r seems <strong>to</strong> be part of a complex flow linked <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Wall
Preliminary results from cosmicflows-2 in 2013 : Reconstructed matter<br />
density (luminous + dark matter) versus galaxy catalog : Perseus-Pisces<br />
<strong>The</strong>se results are initial conditions for <strong>the</strong> 2 nd and 3 rd generation of CLUES constrained<br />
cosmological simulations.
Future surveys and simulaGons<br />
2015 : cosmicflows-‐3<br />
Radio : -‐ conGnue deep HI GBT + PARKES + Archives (~900 GBT -‐ 200 Parkes)<br />
-‐ SKA precursors mulGdish : WALLABY ASKAP, WNSHS AperGf Westerbrok<br />
Pho<strong>to</strong>metry : -‐ near-‐infrared (SPITZER + WISE) (analysis started)<br />
-‐ mulGband (Pan-‐STARRS + SKYMAPPER)<br />
1,800 > 7,000 > 40,000 distances / at 5% / all-‐sky / 200 Mpc<br />
Peculiar Velocity Data will include Shapley<br />
super-‐cluster, observe closer <strong>to</strong> ZOA<br />
Do we reach <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> cosmic flow<br />
mo2on <strong>to</strong>wards <strong>the</strong> CMB?<br />
Can we explain it with standard cosmology ?<br />
space<br />
Zone of avoidance<br />
North South
COSFLO team, major results in 2012<br />
• Publication of analysis of cosmicflows-1 catalog (observational data) :<br />
Production of 4D dynamic maps of <strong>the</strong> dark matter in <strong>the</strong> Local Universe up <strong>to</strong> 80 Mpc (z=0.01).<br />
Localisation of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Attrac<strong>to</strong>r region and of <strong>the</strong> remaining tidal field of 90km/s wrt CMB dipole.<br />
in collaboration with Hawaii Univ., USA and Special Observa<strong>to</strong>ry, Russia<br />
• Publication of a new code (IceCore) <strong>to</strong> build constrained initial conditions from peculiar velocities.<br />
in collaboration with Hebrew Univ, Israel and Potsdam Univ., Germany<br />
• Preparation of <strong>the</strong> second generation of catalog of peculiar velocities cosmicflows-2, publication of <strong>the</strong><br />
recalibration of <strong>the</strong> Tully-Fisher relation using more than 200 SNIa, Cepheids and 13 galaxy clusters.<br />
in collaboration with Hawaii Univ.<br />
• Publication of a new accurate Hubble constant (up <strong>to</strong> z=1) derived from I band ground pho<strong>to</strong>metry<br />
and space near-infrared measurements : H0 = 75.9 ± 3.8 km.s−1Mpc−1 140<br />
in collaboration with Carnegie Institute (Hubble key <strong>project</strong>) and Univ. Maryland, USA<br />
• Start of <strong>the</strong> science work on Euclid space mission :<br />
Definition of <strong>the</strong> interface between NISP instrument simula<strong>to</strong>r OU-SIM and <strong>the</strong><br />
cosmological numerical simulations CSWG.<br />
Preparing <strong>the</strong> production of <strong>the</strong> first simulated images for NISP.<br />
in collaboration with CPPM Marseille and Durham Univ., UK<br />
SGY [Mpc/h]<br />
160<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
GA<br />
COMA<br />
LSC<br />
30<br />
60<br />
<strong>Great</strong> attrac<strong>to</strong>r<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160<br />
SGX [Mpc/h]<br />
PP<br />
log(δ+1)<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
-0.5
Thank you<br />
hope you will take home some sense<br />
of your cosmography !