24.07.2013 Views

Commercial Legal And Institutional Reform (CLIR) - Economic Growth

Commercial Legal And Institutional Reform (CLIR) - Economic Growth

Commercial Legal And Institutional Reform (CLIR) - Economic Growth

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COMMERCIAL LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL REFORM<br />

Diagnostic Assessment Report for the Republic of Bulgaria March 2002<br />

B. COLLATERAL LAW<br />

OVERVIEW<br />

A healthy system of secured lending depends upon three elements: an appropriate legal<br />

regime, an effective registry, and reliable enforcement. Only two of these elements are<br />

present in Bulgaria. Weaknesses in the system of enforcement are producing serious<br />

negative consequences for the growth of the credit industry and the cost and availability<br />

of credit. Addressing the problem will require a broad-based approach focused on both<br />

legal and institutional weaknesses.<br />

The legal regime for collateral law in Bulgaria is essentially sound. The basic law is<br />

modern and sophisticated and theoretically permits most types of secured transactions.<br />

Although some refinements are needed, the existing laws provide the necessary<br />

foundation for the growth of secured credit. Likewise, the Special Pledge Registry is<br />

effectively meeting most needs of users at this time. The registry is computerized,<br />

functions rapidly, and enjoys excellent reviews from users. The only significant<br />

shortcoming of the registry is the lack of a centralized database via Internet or intranet to<br />

permit simultaneous computerized searches of all records, but this can be remedied easily<br />

at relatively low cost. In short, no significant changes are required in the principal<br />

framework laws or registry in the near term.<br />

Despite these positive findings, development of collateral lending continues to be<br />

adversely affected by the lack of efficient and predictable enforcement mechanisms.<br />

Users, banks, and practitioners complained unanimously about the costs, delays, and lack<br />

of predictability in the enforcement system. Some changes are under way, with proposals<br />

for changes in the civil code being developed by industry groups and legal professionals.<br />

Even these changes, if adopted, will be stymied by the dysfunctional bailiff system. Selfhelp<br />

is improving as an option but is not viable overall. Thus repossession is difficult,<br />

costly, and uncertain.<br />

In short, secured lending has the right framework in place, but the breakdown in<br />

enforcement is constraining the availability of credit while driving up costs.<br />

LEGAL FRAMEWORK<br />

The principal legislative framework for secured lending is set forth in the Law on Special<br />

Pledges, adopted in 1996, and entered into force on April 1st, 1997. The law establishes<br />

a modern, well-conceived foundation for the development and implementation of a<br />

secured lending regime with well-defined priorities and protections based on public<br />

notice through registration. Although refinements are needed in some areas, no major<br />

reforms are required.<br />

The Law on Special Pledges provides for ample forms of possessory, retained title, and<br />

nonpossessory pledges. These include special pledges on accounts receivable, shares,<br />

warehouse receipts, livestock, and an enterprise as a going concern. The overall<br />

framework does not yet adequately provide, however, for securitization or<br />

Booz Allen Hamilton<br />

Page 26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!