A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Graduate Studies Of ... - Cubits
A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Graduate Studies Of ... - Cubits
A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Graduate Studies Of ... - Cubits
Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
A <strong><strong>The</strong>sis</strong><br />
<strong>Presented</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Faculty</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Graduate</strong> <strong>Studies</strong><br />
<strong>Of</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Guelph -<br />
In partial fulfillment <strong>of</strong> the requirements<br />
For the degree <strong>of</strong><br />
Masters <strong>of</strong> Science<br />
Oct, 2000<br />
O Kristen Leigh Ch<strong>of</strong>fe
National Library<br />
I*l <strong>of</strong>Canada<br />
Bibliothèque nationale<br />
du Canada<br />
Acquisitions and Acquisitions et<br />
Bibliographic Services services bibliographiques<br />
395 Welling<strong>to</strong>n Street 395. rue Welling<strong>to</strong>n<br />
OttawaON KtAON4 Ottawa ON KI A ON4<br />
Canada Canada<br />
Your file Votre refërence<br />
Our file Narre refdrence<br />
<strong>The</strong> author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non<br />
exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la<br />
National Library <strong>of</strong> Canada <strong>to</strong> Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de<br />
reproduce, loan, distribute or sen reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou<br />
copies <strong>of</strong> this thesis in micr<strong>of</strong>orm, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous<br />
paper or electronic formats. la forme de micr<strong>of</strong>iche/tilm, de<br />
reproduction sur papier ou sur format<br />
électronique.<br />
<strong>The</strong> author retains ownership <strong>of</strong> the L'auteur conserve la propriété du<br />
copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse.<br />
thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels<br />
may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés<br />
reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son<br />
pemiission. au<strong>to</strong>risation.
ABSTRACT<br />
MICROPROPAGATION OF ECHI~ACEA PURPUMA L-<br />
Kristen Leigh Ch<strong>of</strong>fe Advisor<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Guelph, 2000 Dr. P.K. Saxena<br />
Echinacea purpureu L. is one <strong>of</strong> the most cornmon medicinal plants used as an<br />
immunostimulant. <strong>The</strong> objective <strong>of</strong> this research was <strong>to</strong> develop in vitro propagation pro<strong>to</strong>cols<br />
for E. purpurea. Both somatic embryogenesis and shoot organogenesis were induced on petiole<br />
sections cultured on a medium containing BAP (benzylaminopurine). Prolific root<br />
organogenesis was observed on etiolated hypocotyl and cotyledon segments exposed <strong>to</strong> IBA<br />
(indolebutyric acid) and IAA (indoleacetic acid). CaIlus formation was obsexved on hypocotyl<br />
explants exposed <strong>to</strong> high levels <strong>of</strong> DA, which when subcultured on BAP supplemented medium<br />
resulted in the indirect differentiation <strong>of</strong> somatic embryos. Exposure <strong>of</strong> the etiolated hypocotyls<br />
<strong>to</strong> TDZ (thidiazuron) in the medium resulted in de novo shoot organogenesis. Together, these<br />
data provide several regeneration systems for the production <strong>of</strong> consistent plant material for<br />
biochemical analysis and commercial production <strong>of</strong> Echinacea pttrpurea.
ACKNO WLEDGEMENTS<br />
Dedicatea <strong>to</strong> the memoqy <strong>of</strong> qy inother, hi en ne Josce ~ a h o f f e<br />
My sincere appreciation and thanks are foremost directed <strong>to</strong> Dr. Praveen K. Saxena<br />
without whose faith, trust, guidance and wisdom would not have made this journey a reality. I<br />
would also like <strong>to</strong> extend my thanks <strong>to</strong> my advisory cornmittee, Dr. Calvin Chang and Dr. John<br />
T.A. Proc<strong>to</strong>r, whose expenence and knowledge greatly helped in the completion <strong>of</strong> my thesis.<br />
1 am extremely gratefül <strong>to</strong> Dr. Susan J. Murch who carefully guided me through and gave<br />
me the strength <strong>to</strong> survive the pitfalls <strong>of</strong> my studies. 1 would also like <strong>to</strong> heartily thank the rnany<br />
people who are an integral part <strong>of</strong> the Plant Tissue Culture Labora<strong>to</strong>ry for their advise,<br />
assistance, support and bonding sessions throughout my studies. Thank you <strong>to</strong> Dr. S.<br />
KrishnaRaj, Dr. S heila Chiwocha, Tereza Dan, Mark Garnett, Tannis Slimmon, Skye Campbell,<br />
Mithila Jugulam, Andrew McCartney and Jerrin Vic<strong>to</strong>r. My thanks also <strong>to</strong> Robert Nichols who<br />
was always around <strong>to</strong> <strong>of</strong>fer his unique sense <strong>of</strong> humour, patience and advise.<br />
To my sister Kelly Dicks, who has aIways been there <strong>to</strong> <strong>of</strong>fer her support, comfort and <strong>to</strong><br />
share in my joys, and <strong>to</strong> my father, Donald Ch<strong>of</strong>fe, for his faith and love I <strong>of</strong>fer my appreciation<br />
and rny heart. And <strong>to</strong> my fiancé and soulmate, Edward Galvez, goes my undying devotion for<br />
his patience, love and support as well as for the sacrifices he made for me <strong>to</strong> achieve this<br />
incredible goal in my life.
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
ACKNO WLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................ r'<br />
TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................... r r<br />
LIST OF FIGURES ........ . .............................................................................................................. v<br />
..............................................................................................................................<br />
LIST OF TABLES vzzz<br />
LIST OF A BBRE VIA TIONS .................................................................................................................... i.~<br />
CHAPTER I . LVTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1<br />
Micropropagation Techniques ..................... . .................................................................... - 3<br />
Objectives .................................................................................................................................... 5<br />
Speczjic Objectives ................................................................................. . .................................. 5<br />
CHAPTER 2 . LITERATURE RE V/E w ..................................................................................................... 6<br />
Micropropugution Technology: Poten tial Applications For Production <strong>of</strong> Quali Echinacea<br />
Prodzicts .................... ,. ......................................................................................................... 6<br />
liztrodziction ................................................................................................................................. 6<br />
Dornzancy and Gernzination ....................................................................................................... 7<br />
Adulîercrtion wirh Misiden trfied Species ..................................................................................... 7<br />
Contamination With Fungi. Bacteria and Insects ....................................................................... 8<br />
L oss <strong>of</strong> Wild Gemplasnz ........................................................................................................... 10<br />
Need foi- Standardizatiolz .......................................................................................................... I l<br />
In Vitro Propagation ................................................................................................................. 13<br />
In Vitro Cziltzire <strong>of</strong> Echinacea ................................................................................................... 13<br />
CeZl Szqensioiz Cultures <strong>of</strong> Echinacea .................................................................................... 14<br />
Agrobacterium Mediated Genetic Transformation ................................................................... 14<br />
. .<br />
11<br />
..<br />
...
Induction <strong>of</strong> Indirect Regenerarion ........ . ................................................................................ 41<br />
Results ....................................................................................................................................... 42<br />
Direct shoot Organogenesis .................. . .............................................................................. 42<br />
Indirect Somatic Embtyogenesis ............................................................................................... 43<br />
Discussion ................................................................................................................................. 66<br />
CHAPTER 5 . DE Nova ROOT ORGANOGENESIS /N HYPOCOTYL AND COTYLEDON CULTURES OF<br />
ECHINACEA PURPUREA L ................................................................................................................ 68<br />
Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 68<br />
Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 68<br />
Materials and Methods ............................................................................................................. 69<br />
Esrablishmerir <strong>of</strong> SteriZe Seedlings ............................................................................................ 69<br />
Explant CzrZture ......................................................................................................................... 70<br />
Results ......................................... . ......................................................................................... 70<br />
Regenemtion <strong>of</strong> Hypocoryl Explants ........................................................................................ 70<br />
Regeneratioiz <strong>of</strong> Cotyledon Erplants ........................................................................................ 72<br />
Disctrssion ................................................................................................................................. 89<br />
CHA PTER 6: RESULTS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS .............................................................................. 91<br />
References .............................................................................. . ......................................... 94<br />
APPENDIXI: THE DEVELOPMENT OF STERILIZATlON PROCEDURES FOR ECHINACEA PURPUREA .<br />
ACHENES ....................................................................................................................................... 104<br />
A PPENDIX IL- THESIS PUBLICA TIQNS .............................................................................................. 106
LIST OF FIGURES<br />
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ I<br />
Figure 1. Route <strong>of</strong> regeneration showing indirect differentiation (callus, ce11 suspension and<br />
pro<strong>to</strong>plast) and direct differentiation <strong>of</strong> new plantlets by organogenesis and somatic<br />
embryogenesis fiom explants. ....................... . ........................................................................ 4<br />
CHA PTER 3. IN VITRO REGENERA TION OF ECHINA cEA PURPUREA L. : DIRECT SOMA TIC EMBR YOGENESIS<br />
AND INDIRECTSHOOT ORGANOGENESISIN PETIOLE CULTURE ............................................................ f 6<br />
Figure 1. Effects <strong>of</strong> the cy<strong>to</strong>kinin BAP on regeneration <strong>of</strong> Echinacea pztrpurea petiole<br />
explants. .................................................................................................................................... 2 1<br />
Figure 2. Developrnent <strong>of</strong> regenerants on Echinacea ptirpurea petiole explants in response <strong>to</strong><br />
1 .<br />
BAP (5 prno1.L- ) in the culture medium. ..........................~.................................................... 27<br />
Figure 3. His<strong>to</strong>logical evidence <strong>of</strong> organogenesis in petiole culture <strong>of</strong> Echinacea pzirpzirea in<br />
response <strong>to</strong> BAP ........................................................................................................................ 29<br />
Figure 4. His<strong>to</strong>logical evidence <strong>of</strong> somatic embryogenesis in petiole cultures <strong>of</strong> Echirzacea<br />
pzrvpzrrea L. in response <strong>to</strong> BAP. ............................................................................................ 33<br />
CHAPTER 4. REGENERQT~ON OF ECHMCEA PURPUREA HYPOCOTYL EXPLANTS VIA SHOOT<br />
ORGANOGENESIS AND SOMA TIC EMBR YOGENESIS.. ........................................................................... 38<br />
Figure 1. Effect <strong>of</strong> the concentration and duration <strong>of</strong> the cy<strong>to</strong>kinin TDZ on root organogenesis<br />
<strong>of</strong> Echinacea pztrpurea hypocotyls. .......................................................................................... 46<br />
Figure 2. Induction <strong>of</strong> shoot organogenesis on Echinacea purpurea hypocotyl explants in<br />
response <strong>to</strong> different TDZ concentrations and induction period on TDZ-supplemented<br />
medium. .................... . ....................................................................................................... 48
Figure 3. Effects <strong>of</strong> the auxin NAA and the cy<strong>to</strong>kinin BAP on shoot organogenesis Ecliinacea<br />
pzlrpurea hypocotyl explants after 33 days. ............... . ...................................................... 50<br />
Figure 4. Effects <strong>of</strong> the auxin NAA and the cy<strong>to</strong>kinin BAP on root organogenesis Echirzacea<br />
ptrrpurea hypocotyl explants der 33 days ..................... . ..................................................... 52<br />
Figure 5. Callus formation on an Echinaceapurpurea hypocotyl on 100 pmol-~-l BA after 4<br />
weeks <strong>of</strong> culture- ............................ . .................................................................................. 54<br />
Figure 6. Effects <strong>of</strong> the auxin IBA and the cy<strong>to</strong>kinin BAP on formation <strong>of</strong> root organogenesis<br />
from callused Echinacea purpurea hypocotyi explants after 33 days. ..................................... 56<br />
Figure 7. Effects <strong>of</strong> the auxin B A and the cy<strong>to</strong>kinin BAP on formation <strong>of</strong> sornatic<br />
embryogenesis from callused Echinacea purpurea hypocotyl explants after 38 days. ............ 58<br />
Figure 8. Different stages <strong>of</strong> somatic embryogenesis formed fiom callus induced by culture <strong>of</strong><br />
Echinacea hypocotyl explants on 100 pmol-L-1 IBA and subcukured on 7.5 pmol-L-1 BAP<br />
after 3 8 days <strong>of</strong> subculture with BAP. ...................................................................................... 60<br />
Figure 9. Globular stage somatic embryos formed fiorn hypocotyl explants <strong>of</strong> Eclziiîacea<br />
pzirpurea L. cultured on 100 pmol-L" IBA and 5 pmol-~-l BAP after 2 1 days <strong>of</strong> subculrure<br />
with BAP ...................... . .................................................................................................... 62<br />
Figure 10. Heart shaped somatic embryos formed corn hypocotyl explants <strong>of</strong> Echinacea<br />
purpureu L. cultured on 50 pmol-~'l IBA and 2.5 pm<strong>of</strong>-~-' BAP afler 21 days <strong>of</strong> subculture<br />
with BAP. .................................................................................................................................. 64<br />
CHAPTER 5. DE NO VO ROOT ORGANOGENESIS IN HYPOCOTYL AND COTYLEDON CULTURES OF<br />
EC~ACEA PURPUREA L. ............................................................................................................... 68<br />
Fiawe 1. Root organogenesis in cultured hypocotyl explants <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpzu-ea L. after<br />
28 days in culture. ..................................................................................................................... 73<br />
vi
Figure 2. Root organogenesis <strong>of</strong> Echinacea pu~urea hypocotyl explants cultured on NAA<br />
after 28 days in culture ............................................................................................ 75<br />
Figure 3. Root organogenesis <strong>of</strong> Echinaceapztrpurea hypocotyl explants cultured on BA.. 77<br />
Figure 4. Root organogenesis <strong>of</strong> Echinacea puvurea hypocotyl explants cultured on M.. 79<br />
Figure 5. Effect <strong>of</strong> IPA concentration on root origin (direct or indirect regeneiation) in<br />
Echinacea purpurea hypocotyl explants der 28 days in culture ............................................ 8 1<br />
Figure 6. Root organogenesis in cultured cotyledon explants <strong>of</strong> Echinaceaprtrpitrea L. afier<br />
28 days in culture. .........,... ................. - ......................... . .......................... ............... .. 83<br />
Figure 7. Effects <strong>of</strong> the auxin IBA on root organogenesis <strong>of</strong> Echinacea piirprtrea cotyledon<br />
explants after 28 days <strong>of</strong> culture. ......................................................................... ........... . 85<br />
Figure 8. Effects <strong>of</strong> the auxin IAA on root organogenesis <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpzrrea cotyledon<br />
explants after 28 days <strong>of</strong> culture. .................................... . ............................................... 87<br />
vii
LIST OF TABLES<br />
CHAPTER 2. LITERA TURE RE VIEW .................................................................................................... 6<br />
Table 1: Chernicals produced in achenes and seedlings <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpurea. E.<br />
angust~yolia and E. pallida ......................................................................................................... 9<br />
Table 2: Various substances found in Eclzinac~a species and their proposed pharmaceutical<br />
properties ............... . ......................................................................................................... t 2<br />
CHAPTER 3. IN VITRO REGENERA TION OF ECHINACEA PURPUREA L. : DIRECT SOMA TIC ElMBR YOGENESIS<br />
AND INDIRECT SHOOT ORGANOGENESIS IN PETIULE CULTURE. .............. ,. ........................S......-......... 16<br />
Table 1. Effects <strong>of</strong> the auxin NAA and the cy<strong>to</strong>kinin BAP on formation <strong>of</strong> somatic<br />
embryogenesis, shoot and root organogenesis <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purptiren petiole explants. ........ 23<br />
Table 2. Effects <strong>of</strong> the auxin 2,4-D and the cy<strong>to</strong>kinin BAP on formation <strong>of</strong> sornatic<br />
embryogenesis and root organogenesis <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpurea petiole explants. ................... 24<br />
Table 3. Effects <strong>of</strong> IAA and TDZ on regeneration <strong>of</strong> Echinaceapurpzirea petiole explants. .. 23<br />
Table 4. Effects <strong>of</strong> TDZ concentration and duration on formation <strong>of</strong> somatic embryogenesis,<br />
shoot and root organogenesis <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpurea petiole explants. .................................. 26<br />
-~PPEND/XI: THE DE VELOPMENT OF STER(LIZ4 TION PROCEDURES FOR ECHINACEA PURPUREA L.<br />
ACHENU. .................................................................................................................................... 104<br />
Table 1 : Sterilization methods and results for Echinacea purpurea achenes. ....................... 105
LIST OF ABBREUA TIONS<br />
-y 7 4-D 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid<br />
BAP benzylaminopurine<br />
FAA fonnalin/glacial acetic acid<br />
GA3 gibberellic acid<br />
M indoleacetic acid<br />
IBA indolebutyric acid<br />
MS Murashige and S koog Medium ( 1963)<br />
PGR P Iant Growth Regula<strong>to</strong>r<br />
PPM Plant Preservation Mixture Plant Ce11 Technology, inc. Washing<strong>to</strong>n, D.C.<br />
NAA naphthaleneacetic acid<br />
SAS Statistical Analysis System<br />
TDZ thidiazuron m-phenyl-NY(1.2,3-thidiazol-5-yl)urea]
CHAPTER 1. I~ODUCTION<br />
<strong>The</strong> past 20 years have seen a rapid nse in phy<strong>to</strong>pharmaceutical consumption.<br />
According <strong>to</strong> the Canadian Phannaceutical Association, the Canadian herbal medicine<br />
market was valued at $1 50 million in 1995 and is growing at an annual rate <strong>of</strong> 15%. A<br />
1993 survey accounted for 20% <strong>of</strong> Canadians who use some form <strong>of</strong> alternative<br />
medicine. As well, according <strong>to</strong> the New York Times and the Arnencan Pharrnaceutical<br />
Association, greater than one third <strong>of</strong> Americans are using herbs for health purposes and<br />
1999 saw sales in this area approaching $4 billion (Barrett et al., 1999). Many<br />
estabIished pharmaceutical companies are now looking in<strong>to</strong> manufacturing<br />
phy<strong>to</strong>medicinal and nutraceuticals products. However, there is a need for some kind <strong>of</strong><br />
quality control <strong>to</strong> supply the market with standardized and consistent plant material.<br />
Echinacea purpzirea L. is one herbal product that has considerabIe consumer<br />
appeal as cold and flu prevention supplements. Echinacea products are ranked arnung<br />
the <strong>to</strong>p 10 herbal products (Clarke, 1999) and represent 9.9% <strong>of</strong> the market share <strong>of</strong> the<br />
medicinal herbal industry (Li, 1998). Although Echinacea products are widely sold in<br />
North Arnerica no standardization exists for the plant material in terms <strong>of</strong> "suspected"<br />
medicinal compounds produced f<strong>to</strong>m secondary metabolites. Large inconsistencies can<br />
occur in crop content or composition due <strong>to</strong> year-<strong>to</strong>-year variability, insect or disease<br />
infestation or other environmental fac<strong>to</strong>rs. Moreover, the effects <strong>of</strong> these influences are<br />
manifested over the 3 - 4 year production time <strong>of</strong> a harvestable product (Li, 1998).<br />
As with many herbal preparations, the characterization <strong>of</strong> active ingredients and<br />
commercial production <strong>of</strong> Echinacea species has been limited by a range <strong>of</strong> issues<br />
including: a) contamination <strong>of</strong> the plant material with insects, h gi and bacteria, b) the
length <strong>of</strong> time required for production <strong>of</strong> a saleable product, c) plant-<strong>to</strong>-plant and year-<strong>to</strong>-<br />
year variability in the active components <strong>of</strong> the plant material, and d) the lack <strong>of</strong> pure<br />
standardized plant material for biochemical analysis. In addition, the medicinal content<br />
<strong>of</strong> phy<strong>to</strong>pharmaceutical plant preparations <strong>of</strong>ten varies due <strong>to</strong> adulteration OF medicinal<br />
preparations with misidentified plant species, consumer fkaud, a lack <strong>of</strong> adequate rnethods<br />
for production and standardization <strong>of</strong> the crop, and a lack <strong>of</strong> understanding <strong>of</strong> the unique<br />
plant physiology or efficacy with human consumption.<br />
Micropropagation Techniques<br />
Plants have the unique capability <strong>to</strong> develop in<strong>to</strong> complete plants fiorn a single<br />
cell. This phenomenon is termed <strong>to</strong>tipotency and each plantlet developed £<strong>to</strong>m these<br />
cells is likely <strong>to</strong> be similar <strong>to</strong> the parent plant (Thorpe, 1994). Micropropagation <strong>of</strong><br />
phy<strong>to</strong>medicinal species exploits this ability and, by careful manipulation <strong>of</strong> plant growth<br />
hormones and nutrients, provides us with the ability <strong>to</strong> produce rnany identical or clona1<br />
<strong>of</strong>fspring expressing the sarne or greater concentrations <strong>of</strong> their valuable metabolites.<br />
In the micropropagation process, srnall pieces <strong>of</strong> tissue called explants are excised<br />
from seedlings or plantlets and exposed <strong>to</strong> an induction medium that satisfies al1 <strong>of</strong> the<br />
requirements for plant growth and development. Disrupting the connection <strong>of</strong> plant cells<br />
with the matemal tissue allows for the manipulation <strong>of</strong> the developmental pathways<br />
(Steward, 1961). Addition <strong>of</strong> phy<strong>to</strong>hormones <strong>to</strong> the culture media redirects the growth<br />
and differentiation <strong>of</strong> somatic cells (Skoog & Miller, 1957). New ce11 proliferation and<br />
differentiation in criltured plant cells can occur in two different developmental pathways:<br />
a) organogenesis or b) somatic embryogenesis. <strong>The</strong> organogenic mode <strong>of</strong> development<br />
results in renewed generation <strong>of</strong> shoots and/or roots fiom cultured tissue <strong>to</strong> asexually
produce organs and eventually whole plants. Somatic embryogenesis is also an asexual<br />
method <strong>of</strong> propagation and the resulting clones are genetically identical unlike sexually<br />
produced embryos, which are recombination products <strong>of</strong> individual male and female<br />
garnetes. In both organogenesis and sornatic embryogenesis, the differentiation is either<br />
direct or indirect. Indirect morphogenesis is defined as the formation <strong>of</strong> callus on<br />
explants and the subsequent development <strong>of</strong> shoots, roots or somatic embryos (Sharpe et<br />
al., 1980). Development <strong>of</strong> callus or ce11 culture is the result <strong>of</strong> a dedifferentiation or<br />
reversion <strong>of</strong> the plant cells <strong>to</strong> the meristematic phase <strong>of</strong> ce11 development. In contrast,<br />
direct differentiation is the development <strong>of</strong> organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis<br />
directly £<strong>to</strong>m the explant tissue without a callus (dedifferentiation) stage (Fig. i).<br />
<strong>The</strong> developmental route and fiequency <strong>of</strong> regeneration in any tissue culture<br />
system is dependent on several fac<strong>to</strong>rs: a) selection <strong>of</strong> an appropnate explant, b)<br />
preparation <strong>of</strong> the explant, c) supplementation <strong>of</strong> plant tissue culture media with the<br />
optimal combination <strong>of</strong> growth regulating compounds and amendments, and d)<br />
optimization <strong>of</strong> environmental conditions for the development <strong>of</strong> regenerants (Thorpe<br />
1994; Skoog & Miller 1957).
Plantlet<br />
Figure 1. Route <strong>of</strong> regeneration showing indirect differentiation (cailus, cell suspension<br />
and pro<strong>to</strong>plast) and direct diEerentiation <strong>of</strong> new plantlets by organogenesis and somatic<br />
embryogenesis tiom explants.
Objectives<br />
<strong>The</strong> main objective <strong>of</strong> this research was <strong>to</strong> develop and optimize efficient<br />
micropropagation systerns for the phy<strong>to</strong>medicinal species Echinacea pziipzirea L. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
systems will provide a means <strong>to</strong> obtain large amounts <strong>of</strong> sterile, consistent plant material,<br />
superior in their Ievels <strong>of</strong> active ingredients over a reduced time frame when compared <strong>to</strong><br />
conventional practices.<br />
Speczjk Objectives<br />
To accomplish the main objective the following approaches were taken:<br />
To evaluate the morphogenic potentiaI <strong>of</strong> various Echinacea purpuvea explants<br />
To use auxins and cy<strong>to</strong>kinins <strong>to</strong> develop prolific root and shoot cultures using<br />
both hypocotyi and petiole explant tissues <strong>of</strong> Echinacea pzrrpztrea<br />
To develop and maintain callus cultures for Echinacea pzrrpurea and <strong>to</strong> examine<br />
the ernbryogenic potential <strong>of</strong> the callus
Micropropagation Technology : Poten tial Applications For Prodziction <strong>of</strong> Qrralip<br />
Echinacea Products<br />
Introduction<br />
Echinacea products are among the best-selling herbal remedies in North America.<br />
Although Echinacea has been used by native Americans since the lsth century, the<br />
popularity <strong>of</strong> Echinacea throughout the world can be found originating back <strong>to</strong> early<br />
190OYs, when Dr. H.C.F. Meyer, a Nebraska patent medicine purveyor and crea<strong>to</strong>r <strong>of</strong> the<br />
phrase "snake-oil salesman", <strong>of</strong>fered <strong>to</strong> let himself be bitten by a rattlesnake in order <strong>to</strong><br />
prove the curative ability <strong>of</strong> Echinacea (SrnaIl & Catling, 1999; Kindscher, 1989). In<br />
1998 Echinacea was rated highest among the <strong>to</strong>p ten medicinal herb products (Klausner.<br />
1998) and sales in 1996 were $1.2 million, an increase <strong>of</strong> 53.4% fkorn the previous year<br />
(Richman & Witkowski, 1997). Echinacea products have also been recognized by the<br />
health protection branch <strong>of</strong> Health Canada for its effectiveness in easing sore throats<br />
(Driedger, 2 997).<br />
<strong>The</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> powerfûl and easily obtained antibiotics in the 1930's and<br />
40's caused a rapid decline in the popularity <strong>of</strong> Echinacea products but the products<br />
began <strong>to</strong> regain their appeal in the 1 980's and 90's (Kabaganian et al., 1 999). S ince there<br />
is no known cure for the cornmon cold, traditional rnedicines are being used <strong>to</strong> help<br />
alleviate cold syrnp<strong>to</strong>ms (Driedger, 1997). Echinacea has a long his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> efficacy in<br />
immune system stimulation and vimially no <strong>to</strong>xicity (Mengs et al., 1991). Ecliinacea<br />
products are available in a wide variety <strong>of</strong> forms including liquid capsules, chewable<br />
tablets, tea bags, tinctures and powders. <strong>The</strong> suggested dosage <strong>to</strong> reduce the severity <strong>of</strong>
colds is lg/day <strong>of</strong> rhizome and root products and 8 - 9 mVday <strong>of</strong> juice produced from<br />
aerial plant portions. Cycles <strong>of</strong> 10 days on and 4 days <strong>of</strong>f (Whatley, 1999) for no longer<br />
than 6 <strong>to</strong> 8 weeks (Ness et al., 1999) have also been suggested for full effectiveness.<br />
At the present time, Echinacea products are denved ffom conwentional fieId-<br />
grown plants. In spite <strong>of</strong> the commercial success <strong>of</strong> these products, there are many<br />
challenges associated with the growth and production <strong>of</strong> Echinacea. For instance, as<br />
with many other field-grown medicinal plants, uncontrollable environmental effects such<br />
as rainfall or drought can lead <strong>to</strong> plant-<strong>to</strong>-plant or year-<strong>to</strong>-year variatimn in yield and<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> secondary metabolites produced by the plant species in question (Murch et al.,<br />
2000).<br />
Donnancy and Germination<br />
Echinacea anguîtifolia has been shown <strong>to</strong> have very low germination levels and<br />
variations in emergence times due prirnarily <strong>to</strong> seed dormancy (Small & Catling, 1999;<br />
Baskin et al., 1992). <strong>The</strong> priming and stratification <strong>of</strong> the seeds can partiailly compensate<br />
for this problem. Practices such as priming in a potassium phosphate buffer or with<br />
giberellic acid have shown an increase in seed germination by as much as 266% (Pill &<br />
Haynes, 1 996).<br />
Adzilteration with Misidentifed Species<br />
<strong>The</strong> nine species <strong>of</strong> Echinacea are <strong>of</strong>ten confirsed due <strong>to</strong> discrete differences in<br />
morphology and chernistry, which are not always apparent <strong>to</strong> an untrained eye. An<br />
example is seen in extensive literature on E. angustifolia in which it was consistently<br />
referred <strong>to</strong> as E. pallida (Baskin et al., 1994). In several instances Ecltinacea purpurea<br />
products have been contaminated with Parthenizim integrifoo[iitim (compositae; Bauer,
1998; Hobbs, 1989) as well as contamination with other Echinacea species (07Hara et<br />
al.; 1998; Hobbs, 1989). Although these species have been proven <strong>to</strong> be non-<strong>to</strong>xic, the<br />
medicinal effects <strong>of</strong> the products may still be compromised. For example, commercial<br />
preparations <strong>of</strong> E. angustifolia and E. purpzïrea have been found <strong>to</strong> contain Echiriacea<br />
pallida as a result <strong>of</strong> misidentification due <strong>to</strong> similar plant morphology (Small & Catling,<br />
1999; Hobbs, 1989). <strong>The</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> active constituents in E. pallida is different than that<br />
<strong>of</strong> either E. angustifolia or E. purpuren and this species is less comrnercially valuable<br />
(Hobbs, 1989). <strong>The</strong> most common way <strong>of</strong> differentiating Echirtacea species is the colour<br />
<strong>of</strong> the pollen. <strong>The</strong> flowers <strong>of</strong> E. purpurea and E. nngustifolia produce yellow pollen<br />
while E. pallida flowers typically have white pollen (SrnaIl & Catling, 1999). <strong>The</strong><br />
misidentification <strong>of</strong> Echinacea species can have senous consequences since the species<br />
contain different chernical pr<strong>of</strong>iles (Schulthess et al., 1991). Biochemicals. which<br />
separates the three most notable medicinal species <strong>of</strong> Echinacea species, are summanzed<br />
in Table 1.<br />
Coniam inaiion With Fungi, Bacleria and Insects<br />
Since Echinacea is commonly produced in field conditions, commercial<br />
producers have experienced loss as a result <strong>of</strong> fungi, bacteria andor insect infestations.<br />
Another serious problem associated with bacterial and fimgal contamination can be the<br />
destruction or alteration <strong>of</strong> medicinal compounds by the microorganisrns (Bemath, 1986).<br />
Additionally, the bacteria, Fungi and insects associated with field-produced Echinacea<br />
can contaminate commercial products and as a result, consumers may be exposed <strong>to</strong><br />
health risks.
Table 1: Chernicals produced in achenes and seedlings <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpurea, E.<br />
angrtstifolia and E. pallida (Schulthess et al., 1991).<br />
Species<br />
E. purpurea<br />
Tissue<br />
Achene<br />
Achene<br />
Achene<br />
Root<br />
Compounds specific <strong>to</strong> each species are denoted with *<br />
Chernical Compounds<br />
B-farnescene*<br />
unidentified compound X*<br />
dodeca-2Ey4E,8Z, 1 OE(1 OZ)-tetraenoic acid isobutylamide<br />
1,8-pentadecadiene*<br />
derivative <strong>of</strong> gerrnacrene D*<br />
dodeca-2E,4E,8Z, 1 OE(1 OZ)-tetraenoic acid isobutylamide -<br />
(much lower quantities)<br />
Carvcementhene*<br />
caryphyllene*<br />
gerrnacrene D*<br />
trideca-2E,7Z-diene- 10,12-diynoic acid isobutylamide*<br />
dodeca-2E,4Ey8Zy 1 OE(1 OZ)-tetraenoic acid isobutylamide<br />
trideca-2E,7Z-diene-10,12-diynoic acid isobutylamide*<br />
dodeca-2E,4Ey 10E-trien-8-ynoic acid isobutvlamide*
Weed Compet ition and Adtzlterarion<br />
Weed interference may not only inhibit the establishment and growth <strong>of</strong><br />
Echinacea fields but may also be a source <strong>of</strong> contamination when plant materia1 is<br />
harvested conventionally. <strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> specific herbicides on weed species found mon;<br />
Echinacea stands has been shown <strong>to</strong> be effective for weed control. Beran et al. (1999)<br />
found that the use <strong>of</strong> imidazolinone herbicides effectively controlled invading weed<br />
species without hanning the growth <strong>of</strong> Echinacea plants. A Me<strong>to</strong>lachlor mixture with<br />
sirnazine, isoxaben and oxadiazon was also shown <strong>to</strong> be effective for control <strong>of</strong> weeds not<br />
only on natural stands but also in nursery production <strong>of</strong> Echinacea (Derr, 1993).<br />
However, since Echinacea is commonly sold in health food s<strong>to</strong>res as a "natural" product,<br />
growers are looking for alternate methods for organic production and consurners may not<br />
accept the use <strong>of</strong> herbicides for this crop.<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> Wild Germplasrn<br />
<strong>The</strong> increased popularity <strong>of</strong> Echinacea products has also brought about an<br />
increase in small markets selling herbai products. Many <strong>of</strong> these products contain plant<br />
material coUected fiorn the wild, and these plant collec<strong>to</strong>rs rnay not discriminate between<br />
species <strong>of</strong> Echinacea or the amount <strong>of</strong> matenal being harvested. This practice has<br />
become a threat in the persistence <strong>of</strong> many species <strong>of</strong> Echinacea, some <strong>of</strong> which such as<br />
E. tennesseensis have already been placed on the endangered species list. To meet the<br />
dernand for Echtnacea products and alleviate the harmful effects <strong>of</strong> overharvesting,<br />
increased and more efficient cultivation and propagation methods are necessary<br />
(Kindscher, 1989).
Need for Standardriation<br />
Currently, there is very IittIe scientific information and therefore limited<br />
standardization available for medicina1 plants in general and Echinacea speci fically . As<br />
well, the information that is available cm be complex and comtradic<strong>to</strong>ry. As a result,<br />
major discrepancies occur in levels and ingredients present in herbal products. Many<br />
companies standardize their products <strong>to</strong> the amounts <strong>of</strong> echinacoside present which is a<br />
caffeic acid denvative found mainly in roots <strong>of</strong> E. angustfoZia and E. pallida but does not<br />
possess irnrnunostimula<strong>to</strong>ry effects and only low antibactenal and antiviral activity<br />
(Bauer, 1998). Pinpointing one specific ingredient has proven <strong>to</strong> be extremeiy difficult.<br />
For instmce as many as 15 alkamides, which are presumed <strong>to</strong> b e responsible for the anti-<br />
inflamma<strong>to</strong>ry action <strong>of</strong> the species, have been identified in the roots <strong>of</strong> Echinacea<br />
angustifoZia and 11 alkamides in the roots <strong>of</strong> E. prclpurea @amer, 1998). Cichoric acid<br />
found in roots <strong>of</strong> E. pztrpurea as well as numerous polysaccharides isolated fiorn<br />
Echinacea species have been found <strong>to</strong> possess immunostirnula<strong>to</strong>ry properties (Bauer,<br />
1998). In many instances, it is the relative balance <strong>of</strong> several comstituents that determines<br />
the effkacy <strong>of</strong> Echinacea products. <strong>The</strong> most highly characterized chemical constituents<br />
<strong>of</strong> Echinacea species are summarized in Table 2. Optirnizatiom <strong>of</strong> specific medicinally<br />
active biochemical pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> Echinacea is desirable but may require extensive research<br />
as the efficacy <strong>of</strong> the individual components is not fûlly established as yet (Wagner,<br />
1999).
Table 2: Various substances found in Eclzinacea species and their proposed<br />
pharmaceutical properties.<br />
Species<br />
E. purpztrea<br />
E. purpztrea<br />
E. purpztrea<br />
Echinacea spp.<br />
Echinacea spp.<br />
Substance '<br />
Alkamides<br />
Root extract 1 Imrnunos tirnula<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
action<br />
Arabinogalactan Macrophage<br />
activation<br />
Arabinogalactan Immunornodulating<br />
activity<br />
Polysacchaxides Protection against<br />
systemic infections<br />
Polysaccharides Phagocyte system<br />
activation<br />
1<br />
Properties<br />
Anti-inflamma<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
Polysaccharides Anti-inflamma<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
I<br />
Unpurified pressed 1 Imunostiniula<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
juice<br />
action<br />
Arabinose and<br />
galac<strong>to</strong>se<br />
Immunomodulating -<br />
activity<br />
Ec hinacoside, Preventionheatment<br />
chicoric acid,<br />
cynarine, caffeic<br />
acid and<br />
chlorogenic acid<br />
<strong>of</strong> skin pho<strong>to</strong>darnage<br />
Reference<br />
Muller-Jakic et al.,<br />
1993<br />
Tragni et al., 1988<br />
&1986<br />
Rehman et al., 1999<br />
Leuttig et al., 1989.<br />
Stimpel et al., 1984<br />
Schollhorn et al.,<br />
1993<br />
Roesler et al., 199 1<br />
Roesler et al., 199 1,<br />
Steinmuller et al.,<br />
1993<br />
Burger et al., 1997<br />
Willigmann et al.,<br />
1993<br />
Facino et al., 1995 1
Irz Vitro Propagation<br />
One solution <strong>to</strong> the problems faced by the phy<strong>to</strong>pharmaceutical industry is the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> in virro systems for the production <strong>of</strong> medicinal plants. In vitro<br />
production <strong>of</strong> plants has several advantages: a) plants are grown in sterile, standardized<br />
conditions therefore eliminating adulteration with fungi, bactena, insects, or any other<br />
plant species; b) wild gennplasm may be replenished and conserved, c) dormancy periods<br />
are reduced or eliminated; d) individual superior plants cm be identified and clonally<br />
propagated; e) plant material is consistent and therefore, precise biochemical<br />
characterizations can be achieved; and f) eventually pro<strong>to</strong>cols can be developed for the<br />
improvement <strong>of</strong> the crop through genetic manipulation.<br />
Individual plant cells possess the unique capacity <strong>to</strong> regenerate and ultimately<br />
produce whole plants in tissue culture without undergoing the process <strong>of</strong> sexual<br />
recombination, a phenornenon known as <strong>to</strong>tipotency (Thorpe, 1994). <strong>The</strong> development<br />
<strong>of</strong> tissue culture techniques relies on this regeneration ability by shifting the growth<br />
direction <strong>of</strong> the cells in various plant organs in ways such as the inclusion <strong>of</strong> plant growth<br />
regula<strong>to</strong>rs in the induction media and manipulation <strong>of</strong> the culture environment (Thorpe,<br />
1994). Optirnization <strong>of</strong> the various media components will ultimately result in the<br />
production <strong>of</strong> masses <strong>of</strong> uniform clones <strong>of</strong> superior individual plantlets.<br />
In Vitro CuZtttre <strong>of</strong> Echinacea<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is currently only Iimited information available with respect <strong>to</strong> the in vitro culture <strong>of</strong><br />
Echinacea. <strong>The</strong> research approaches that have been attempted include the establishment<br />
<strong>of</strong> cell suspension cultures and hairy-root cultures.
Cell Suspension Cultures <strong>of</strong> Ech inacea<br />
Many <strong>of</strong> the in vitro techniques developed for Eclzinacea species have centered<br />
around the development <strong>of</strong> ce11 suspension culhires. In general cell cultures allow for the<br />
continuous harvest <strong>of</strong> plant chemicals and have been effective for the extraction <strong>of</strong> many<br />
valuable products (Alfemann & Petersen, 1995). Examples <strong>of</strong> cell culture derived<br />
medicines are Taxol, an anti-cancer drug fiom Tarus sp. (Jaziri et al., 1996), L-DOPA,<br />
used for the treatment <strong>of</strong> Parkinsons disease, £<strong>to</strong>m Mucuna pruriens and the sedativelpain<br />
killer codeine fiom Papaver sornn$erurn (Pras et al., 1995). Echinacea ce11 cultures were<br />
produced by fust culturing stem explants in<strong>to</strong> a Iiquid medium supplemented with NAA<br />
and kinetin (Rether et al., 1990) followed by biweekly subcultures on the same medium.<br />
Cells cultured in this way generate a continuous supply <strong>of</strong> Echinacea ceils, which<br />
produce the same biochemical compounds as were found in intact plant organs (Rether et<br />
al., 1990). <strong>The</strong>se cultures were then used for the extraction and analysis <strong>of</strong> their active<br />
biochemical constituents and consequent testing for mammalian efficiency (Steinmuller<br />
et al., 1993; Leuttig et al., 1989; Tragni et al., 1988; Wagner et al., l988). <strong>The</strong><br />
development <strong>of</strong> efficient cell suspension cultures has lead <strong>to</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> a<br />
15,000-L fermenter allowing for the production <strong>of</strong> Echinacea polysaccharides on an<br />
industrial scale for use as purified drug products (Bauer, 1998).<br />
Agva bacterium Mediated Genetic Transformation<br />
Agrobacterium rhizogenes transformation has been used for the development <strong>of</strong><br />
hairy root cultures <strong>of</strong> Echinacea (Trypsteen et al., 1991). A. rhizogenes inserts a<br />
fragment <strong>of</strong> DNA in<strong>to</strong> the host genome which results in the rapid growth <strong>of</strong> a prolific root<br />
system (Nilsson & Olsson, 1997). This system is a widely acceptable technique for the
transformation <strong>of</strong> many valuable medicinal root crops <strong>to</strong> promote a pr<strong>of</strong>use root system<br />
providing a more pr<strong>of</strong>itable harvest <strong>of</strong> the secondary metabolites <strong>of</strong> interest. <strong>The</strong><br />
establishment <strong>of</strong> an efficient system for hairy root cultures <strong>of</strong> Echinacea allowed for the<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> an increased volume <strong>of</strong> roots and the mass production <strong>of</strong> the various active<br />
polysaccharides in sterile cultures (Trypsteen et al., 1991).<br />
In spite <strong>of</strong> these research efforts the establishment <strong>of</strong> ce11 suspension and hairy-<br />
root cultures has not significantly impacted the commercial production <strong>of</strong> Echinacea. It<br />
is possible that intact tissues or plantlets are required for the optimal production <strong>of</strong><br />
medicinal components. As well, clona1 production <strong>of</strong> large nurnbers <strong>of</strong> superior<br />
individual Echinncea genotypes has the potential <strong>to</strong> provide growers with an improve3<br />
gempiasm. <strong>The</strong>refore the primary objective <strong>of</strong> this study was <strong>to</strong> develop in virro<br />
regeneration pro<strong>to</strong>cols for Echinacea. <strong>The</strong> in vitro grown plant material is ideal for the<br />
identification and standardization <strong>of</strong> medicinally active compounds and therefore<br />
represents the first step in the production <strong>of</strong> consistent, high-quality Echinacea products.<br />
Further research aimed at selection <strong>of</strong> superior individual plants with preferred<br />
biochemical pr<strong>of</strong>iles will lead <strong>to</strong> the ability <strong>to</strong> clonally propagate the species, increase the<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> active constituents and improve the overall consistency and efficacy <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Echinacea products. Thus the development <strong>of</strong> micropropagation techniques and<br />
implementation on a commercial scale not only has the potential <strong>to</strong> alleviate many <strong>of</strong> the<br />
problems associated with the conventional practices <strong>of</strong> field production but wiII also<br />
enable consumers <strong>to</strong> be able <strong>to</strong> buy standardized preparations <strong>of</strong> Echinacea without<br />
concern for the quality <strong>of</strong> the product.
CHAPTER 3. IN VITRO REGENERATION OF ECHINACEA PURPUREA L+: DIRECT SOMATiï<br />
EMBR YOGENESLS AND INDIRECT SHOOT ORGANOGENESIS IN PETIOLE CULTURE<br />
A bstract<br />
An in vitro propagation system was developed for Echinacea purpzwea L. (purple<br />
coneflower), a medicinal plant cornmonly used in the treatrnent <strong>of</strong> colds, flu and related<br />
ailments. Echhacea seed were found <strong>to</strong> be contarninated with systemic fimgi and<br />
therefore an optimized minimal concentration <strong>of</strong> Plant Preservation Mixture (PPM) was<br />
incorporated in the seed germination medium <strong>to</strong> recover stenle seedlings. Regeneration<br />
was induced on petiole explants £<strong>to</strong>m two-month-old stenle seedlings cultured on<br />
medium supplemented with benzylarninopurine (BAP) or thidiazuron (TDZ) in<br />
combination with indoleacetic acid (IAA). Two distinct forms <strong>of</strong> regeneration were<br />
identified in cultured petiole explants with his<strong>to</strong>logical and morphological observations<br />
viz. the direct formation <strong>of</strong> somatic embryos on the epidermis and the de novo<br />
developrnent <strong>of</strong> shoots from callus tissues formed in subepidermal ce11 layers.<br />
Introduction<br />
Echinacea products are cuxently among the best-selling herbal remedies in North<br />
Amenca and have been for several years (Schardt, 1998). Preparations <strong>of</strong> Echinacea sp.<br />
have his<strong>to</strong>rically been used for the treatment <strong>of</strong> cornmon human ailments such as colds<br />
(Kindscher, 1992). Extracts and dned samples are taken from the mot <strong>of</strong> Echinacea<br />
species, a crop that requires about 3 years <strong>to</strong> produce a saleable product (Li, 1998).<br />
Recent technological advances have allowed researchers <strong>to</strong> analyze some <strong>of</strong> the<br />
medicinally active compounds present in Echinacea sp. and <strong>to</strong> speculate on their modes<br />
<strong>of</strong> action. Complex polysaccharides, such as arabinogalactane and xyloglucan, extracted
from the roots <strong>of</strong> different Echinacea sp. have been found <strong>to</strong> stimulate rnamrnalian<br />
immune systems (Coeugniet and Elek, 1987) and <strong>to</strong> act as anti-inflamma<strong>to</strong>ry agents<br />
(Tragni et al., 1988). <strong>The</strong>se phy<strong>to</strong>chemicals have been found <strong>to</strong> activate mammalian<br />
macrophages (Stimpel et al., 1984), phagocytes (Steinmuller et al., 1993) and <strong>to</strong> stimulate<br />
the production <strong>of</strong> lymphokines (Coeugniet and Elek, 1987). In addition, several other<br />
potentially active ingredients <strong>of</strong> Echinacea including caffeoyl derivatives such as<br />
echinacoside, chlorogenic acid, chicoric acid, cynax-in, and caffeic acid, which is known<br />
<strong>to</strong> prevent skin pho<strong>to</strong>damage (Facino et al., 1995).<br />
As with many herbal preparations, characterization <strong>of</strong> active ingredients and<br />
commercial production <strong>of</strong> Echinacea have been limited by a range <strong>of</strong> issues including: a)<br />
contamination <strong>of</strong> the plant material with insects, h gi and bactena, b) the long period <strong>of</strong><br />
tirne required for production <strong>of</strong> a saleable product, c) plant-<strong>to</strong>-plant and year-<strong>to</strong>-year<br />
variability in the active components <strong>of</strong> the plant material and d) the lack <strong>of</strong> pure<br />
standardized plant material for biochemical analysis. <strong>The</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> a system for<br />
in vitro culture <strong>of</strong> Echinacea will help <strong>to</strong> address many <strong>of</strong> these issues. <strong>The</strong>refore, the<br />
principal objective <strong>of</strong> the current research initiative was <strong>to</strong> develop an efficient<br />
micropropagation system for Echinacea purpurea L..<br />
Methods<br />
Esta bZish rn en t <strong>of</strong> Sterile SeedZings<br />
Echinacea purpurea L. achenes were sterilized by irnmersing in 70% ethanol for<br />
30 sec, soaking in a 5.4% sodium hypochloride solution containing one drop <strong>of</strong> Tween 20<br />
per 500 ml for 18 min, followed by three rinses in sterile deionized water. Fungal<br />
contamination <strong>of</strong> the seeds warranted the supplementation <strong>of</strong> the germination medium
with Plant Preservation Mixture (PPM, 1998). To determine the lowest concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
PPM which would be biostatic <strong>to</strong> fungal growth, various concentrations (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5<br />
ml-L") were included in the water agar (8 g-~-') medium. Stede seeds were geminated<br />
in a growth cabinet in 24-hour darkness at 24°C. After 14 days, four stenle seedlings<br />
were subcultured per Magenta box in a medium containing MS salts (Murashije and<br />
Skoog, 1962), B5 vitamins (Gamborg et al., l968), 30 g-~-' sucrose and 3 g.~-' gelrite.<br />
Petide Culture<br />
Mer 2 months in culture, petiole explants, 2 cm in length, were excised from the<br />
stenle Echinacea purpurea L. seedlings and cultured on<strong>to</strong> the same medium<br />
supplemented with various combinations <strong>of</strong> plant growth regula<strong>to</strong>rs (PGRs). A series <strong>of</strong><br />
expenments was conducted <strong>to</strong> compare the regeneration inducing potential <strong>of</strong><br />
indokacetic acid (IAA: 5 and 10 pmot.~'l), thidiazuron (TDZ: 0.5, 1, 5 and 10 pmol-L-' ),<br />
naphthaleneacetic acid (NU: 5 and 10 ~~oI-L-'), berizylaminopunne (BU: 1, 2.5, 5,<br />
7.5, 10, 12.5 and 15 pmol-~-') or 2,4-dichlorophenylacetic acid (2,4-D: 5 and<br />
10 pmol-L-'). IAA and TDZ were also added <strong>to</strong> the media <strong>to</strong>gether. Treatments were<br />
incubated in a growth cabinet with a 16 hour pho<strong>to</strong>period under cool white light (40-60<br />
pmol pmc2-s-'). Regeneration was quantified after 25 and 33 days for al1 petiole cultures.<br />
After 33 days, the regenerants were excised fiom petioles and subcultured ont0 basal<br />
medium in test tubes for the development <strong>of</strong> plantlets.<br />
Light Microscopy<br />
Petiole explants cultured on medium supplernented with 5 pmol-~*' BAP were<br />
harvested at 0, 3, 5, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 35 days <strong>of</strong> culture. Samples were immediately<br />
fixed in formalin/glacial acetic acid (FAA) and 50% ethanol mixture (5:5:90: v/v/v).
Proper and rapid fixation <strong>of</strong> the sample was ensured by vacuum infiltration <strong>of</strong> the<br />
samples at -20 kPa for IO min. <strong>The</strong> samples were then dehydrated through a graded<br />
tertiary butanol series and embedded in paraffin wax. Transverse 8 pm thin sections<br />
were cut using an ultra micro<strong>to</strong>me (Porter-Blum uItra micro<strong>to</strong>me MT- 1, Ivan Sorvall Inc.,<br />
Connecticut, USA) and stained with alcian green and safianine (Jensen, 1962). <strong>The</strong><br />
sections were observed under a compound light microscope (Zeiss, Germany).<br />
Data AnaZysis<br />
For al1 experiments, the treatrnent consisted <strong>of</strong> 10 plates per treatment with 6<br />
explants per plate. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Student Newman-Kuells<br />
(SNK) means separation test based pm a GLM mode1 <strong>of</strong> SAS (Statistical AnaIysis<br />
System Inc., 1995). <strong>The</strong> means separation test choosen was SNK as previously<br />
recornrnended for in vitra pro<strong>to</strong>cols (Mize et al., 1999). This is a protected mode1 as the<br />
F value was close <strong>to</strong> one in al1 treatments and therefore the mean did not differ<br />
substantially (Snedecor & Cochran, 1989).<br />
ReszcZts<br />
EZirnination <strong>of</strong> Sysremic Fungal Contamination<br />
Echinacea seeds had systemic fungal pathogens that were not completely<br />
destroyed by the seed sterilization pro<strong>to</strong>col using sodium hypochlorite. Addition <strong>of</strong> PPM<br />
<strong>to</strong> the seed germination medium effectively circumvented the problern <strong>of</strong> contamination.<br />
<strong>The</strong> optimal concentration <strong>of</strong> PPM was determined <strong>to</strong> be 3 ml-L-'. At higher<br />
concentrations, the Echinacea seedlings were significantly shorter and their hypocotyls<br />
appeared sninted while concentrations lower than 3 rnl-~-' did not effectively elirninate<br />
fùngal growth.
Regeneration F m Petiole Eqlants<br />
Regeneration (shoots andlor somatic embryos) was induced on petiole explants on<br />
media containing BAP or the combination <strong>of</strong> TDZ and IAA. Media containing 1 - 15<br />
pmol-~-l BAP as the sole PGR was found <strong>to</strong> induce de novo shoot formation at al1<br />
concentrations (Fig. 1) and 80 - 90% <strong>of</strong> the explants responded <strong>to</strong> the treatment regardless<br />
<strong>to</strong> the BAP concentration. <strong>The</strong> optimum level <strong>of</strong> BAP was 2.5 pnol-L-', which yielded<br />
an average <strong>of</strong> 8.1 regenerants per explant in 33 days. Application <strong>of</strong> BAP in cornbination<br />
with NAA or 2,4-D inhibited regeneration (Tables 1 and 2). When 2,4-D was used alone<br />
regeneration was inhibited (Table 2). Petiole explants induced with NAA alone at 5 or 10<br />
pnol-L-' formed an average <strong>of</strong> 2.2 roots per explant and only 54.5% <strong>of</strong> the explants<br />
responded (Table 1). Similarly, about 90% <strong>of</strong> the explants showed root formation with<br />
IAA (5 and 10 Itmol-~-l) alone whereas regeneration was achieved in >95% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
cultures when IAA was combined with TDZ or when the medium was supplemented with<br />
TDZ alone (Tables 3 and 4).
Figure 1. Effects <strong>of</strong> the cy<strong>to</strong>kinin B AP on regeneration <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpurea petiole<br />
explants.<br />
Statistical differences were assessed by Student Newman-Kuells mean<br />
separation test after 33 days <strong>of</strong> culture.
O<br />
Con<br />
5 7.5 10 12.5<br />
Benzylaminopurine (pmc
Table 1. Effects <strong>of</strong> the auxin NAA and the cy<strong>to</strong>kinin BAP on formation <strong>of</strong> somatic<br />
embryogenesis, shoot and root organogenesis <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpurea petiole expiants.<br />
Statistical differences assessed by the Student Newman-Kuells mean separations<br />
test afier 33 days <strong>of</strong> culture.<br />
NAA BAP Number <strong>of</strong> Number <strong>of</strong> Number <strong>of</strong><br />
Concentration Concentration ernbryosl shoots/ roots/<br />
(09 (PM) petiole petiole petiole<br />
abc Values within a column with different superscripts are significantly different<br />
(P
Table 2. Effects <strong>of</strong> the auxin 2,4-D and the cy<strong>to</strong>kinin BAP on formation <strong>of</strong> somatic<br />
embryogenesis and root organogenesis <strong>of</strong> Echinacea puqpurea petiole expiants.<br />
Statistical differences assessed by the Student Newman-Kuells mean separations<br />
test after 33 days <strong>of</strong> culture.<br />
NAA 2,4-D Number <strong>of</strong> Number <strong>of</strong><br />
Concentration Concentration embryod roots/<br />
(PM) (PM) petiole petiole<br />
abc Values within a column with different superscripts are significantly different<br />
(P
Table 3. Effects <strong>of</strong> MA and TDZ on regeneration <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpruea petiole explants.<br />
Statistical differences assessed by the Student Newman-Kuells mean separation test after<br />
33 days <strong>of</strong> culture.<br />
M TDZ Number <strong>of</strong> Nurnber <strong>of</strong><br />
Concentration Concentration regenerantsl rootslpetiole<br />
(CLMI (PM) petiole<br />
O O 0.0" 0.0"<br />
ab Values within a column with different superscripts are significantly different<br />
(P
Table 4. Effects <strong>of</strong> TDZ concentration and duration on formation <strong>of</strong> somatic<br />
embryogenesis, shoot and root organogenesis <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpurea petiole explants.<br />
Statistical differences assessed by the Student Newman-Kuells mean separations test after<br />
3 3 days <strong>of</strong> culture.<br />
TDZ<br />
Concentration<br />
(PM)<br />
Duration Number<strong>of</strong> Number<strong>of</strong> Number<strong>of</strong><br />
on TDZ shoots/ embryod roots/<br />
(day s) petiole petiole petiole<br />
a Values within a column with different superscnpts are significantly different<br />
(Pc0.05).
Figure 2. Development <strong>of</strong> regenerants on Echinacea purpurea petiole explants in response<br />
<strong>to</strong> B AP (5 pmol-~-') in the culture medium.<br />
A. Callus formation was clearly visible on some petioles and shoot regenerants appeared at<br />
the callus interface. B. Individual shoot regenerant on the explant with weIl defined leaf<br />
initials afier 33 days <strong>of</strong> culture. C. Late cotyledonary stage somatic embryo on a petiole<br />
explant after 33 days <strong>of</strong> culture. D. Complete plantlets developed £<strong>to</strong>m somatic embryos<br />
grown on basal medium after 2 rnonths.
Figure 3. His<strong>to</strong>logical evidence <strong>of</strong> organogenesis in petiole culture <strong>of</strong> Echinacea ptzrprwea<br />
in response <strong>to</strong> BAP<br />
A. Pencha1 ceIl division in the subepidermal layers <strong>of</strong> the petiole explant at day 3. Bar<br />
= 20 Fm. B. Formation <strong>of</strong> promeristematic centers in the callus tissue by day 14<br />
(arrowheads). Bar = 680 Pm. C. A closer view <strong>of</strong> the promeristernatic centers observed<br />
on the callus tissue at day 14 revealed cells which were smaller in size and had a dense<br />
cy<strong>to</strong>plasm with prominent nuclei. Bar = 50 Fm. D. <strong>The</strong>se promeristematic centers<br />
developed were further developed in<strong>to</strong> dome shaped meristem zones which were well<br />
defined by day 21. Bar = 50 p m E. Development <strong>of</strong> a shoot meristem and the leaf<br />
primordia by day 21 (arrowhead). Bar = 320 Fm. F. A well developed shoot bud<br />
surrounded by leaf primordia at day 28. Note: Trichornes were observed <strong>to</strong> be associated<br />
with the leaf primordia and xylem elements were present at the base <strong>of</strong> the shoot bud. Bar<br />
= 166 Fm.
Visual and his<strong>to</strong>logical observations <strong>of</strong> the cultures revealed two distinct routes <strong>of</strong><br />
morphogenesis resulting in the formation <strong>of</strong> both somatic embryos and shoots in response<br />
<strong>to</strong> BAP (Figs. 2, 3 and 4). Figure 2 illustrates the various stages <strong>of</strong> plant regeneration<br />
observed in Echinacea purpurea L. petiole cultures. Some petiole explants exposed <strong>to</strong><br />
BAP dedifferentiated <strong>to</strong> fonn callus fiom which de novo shoots arose (Fig. 2A and B)-<br />
Other petiole explants formed somatic embryos on the epidermal layer without an<br />
intervening callus phase (Fig. 2C). Excised regenerants subcultured on medium devoid <strong>of</strong><br />
PGRs formed whole plantlets (Fig. 2D).<br />
Evidence <strong>of</strong> Indirect Shoot Organogenesis<br />
His<strong>to</strong>logical examinations <strong>of</strong> petiole sections harvested after 3 days <strong>of</strong> culture revealed<br />
BAP-induced periclinal division in the subepiderrnal ce11 layers. After 3 <strong>to</strong> 7 days in<br />
culture, the epidermal and subepidemal layers <strong>of</strong> the petiole explant started <strong>to</strong> divide (Fig.<br />
3A). This callus tissue consisted <strong>of</strong> nurnerous meristematic zones [Fig. 3B (arrowheads)<br />
and Cl. <strong>The</strong> cells <strong>of</strong> these promeristematic zones were srnaIl in size with dense cy<strong>to</strong>plasm<br />
and prominent nuclei (Fig. 3C). Further differentiation <strong>of</strong> the promenstematic centers<br />
formed meristematic zones that appeared as well defined dome-shaped shoot meristems by<br />
day 21 (Fig. 3D). <strong>The</strong> shoot meristem developed leaf primordia and eventually forrned<br />
shoot buds afler 22 <strong>to</strong> 33 days (Fig. 3E, arrowhead). A well-developed shoot bud<br />
consisted <strong>of</strong> a dorne shaped shoot meristem surrounded by a few leaf primordia (Fig. 2F).<br />
<strong>The</strong> leaf primordia had well developed trichornes (Fig. 3F, arrows). Vascular elements<br />
(Fig. 3F, arrowhead) were observed sporadically dispersed within the callus, mainly near<br />
the base <strong>of</strong> the shoot buds. By day 33 <strong>of</strong> the culture period, numerous de novo shoots were<br />
visible on the surface <strong>of</strong> the petioIe (Fig. 2A and B). Shoots had an obvious comection <strong>to</strong>
the explant tissue and weI1-defined leaf primordia were also visible with the dissection<br />
microscope.<br />
Evidence <strong>of</strong> Direct Soma tic Em bryogenesz-s<br />
In addition <strong>to</strong> shoot organogenesis, there was evidence <strong>of</strong> somatic embryogenesis in<br />
both his<strong>to</strong>logical and visual observations <strong>of</strong> the petiole cultures. In his<strong>to</strong>logical<br />
observations made at day 14, there were clearly visible penclinal and anticlinal ce11<br />
divisions (Fig. 4A) and onset <strong>of</strong> organized development resembling proembryonic<br />
structures was observed (Fig 4A, arrowheads). By day 33, late globular <strong>to</strong> early heart<br />
shaped somatic embryos were clearly visible in his<strong>to</strong>logical sections (Fig. 4B). <strong>The</strong>se<br />
regenerants had a well-defined pro<strong>to</strong>derm comprised <strong>of</strong> distinct rectangular cells and there<br />
was no evidence <strong>of</strong> vascular connections <strong>to</strong> the materna1 vasculature (Fig. 4B). Late<br />
cotyledonary stage sornatic embryos were also observed on the surface <strong>of</strong> the petiole<br />
expIants exposed <strong>to</strong> BAP (Fig. SC). It is interesting <strong>to</strong> note the absence <strong>of</strong> a callus layer in<br />
both the his<strong>to</strong>logical and morphological observations <strong>of</strong> those petiole sections that<br />
regenerated via somatic embryogenesis (Fig. 2C, 4A and B).<br />
Corzversiorz <strong>to</strong> Plantlets<br />
Somatic embryos and shoots were separated fiorn the explant tissues and<br />
subcultured on basal medium in test tubes for conversion <strong>to</strong> plantlets (Fig. 3D). More than<br />
90% <strong>of</strong> al1 regenerants developed in<strong>to</strong> intact plantlets within 30 days. Plantlets (90 -<br />
100%) transplanted <strong>to</strong> a commercial soi1 mix survived and grew <strong>to</strong> maturity under<br />
standard greenhouse conditions.
Figure 4. His<strong>to</strong>logical evidence <strong>of</strong> somatic embryogenesis in petiole cultures <strong>of</strong> Echinacea<br />
puvpurea L. in response <strong>to</strong> BAP.<br />
A. Series <strong>of</strong> anticlinal and penclinal divisions leading <strong>to</strong> the formation <strong>of</strong> organized<br />
proembryonic tissue by day 14 (arrowheads). Bar = 50 Fm. B. A well-developed hem-<br />
shaped somatic embryo with a fuliy formed pro<strong>to</strong>derm was observed at day 21. Bar-320<br />
Pm-
Discussion<br />
<strong>The</strong> value <strong>of</strong> commercial Echinacea production in Canada has been estimated <strong>to</strong> be<br />
in the range <strong>of</strong> $25 million per annurn. <strong>The</strong> high value <strong>of</strong> this crop coupled with the limited<br />
available uiformation about the unique biochemical processes in this plant species<br />
warranted the development <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>to</strong>cols for the in vitro propagation <strong>of</strong> Echirzacea. <strong>The</strong><br />
most important results <strong>of</strong> this study are (1) the establishment <strong>of</strong> sterile seedlings in culture,<br />
(2) the development <strong>of</strong> a pro<strong>to</strong>col for in vitro regeneration from petiole explants and (3) the<br />
simultaneous formation <strong>of</strong> shoots and somatic ernbryos in response <strong>to</strong> BAP.<br />
Echinacea purpurea L. has been a difficult species <strong>to</strong> establish with conventional<br />
tissue culture pro<strong>to</strong>cols. Systemic fûngal contamination was persistent and prolific.<br />
<strong>The</strong>refore, the elimination <strong>of</strong> contamination by incorporation <strong>of</strong> PPM in the seed<br />
germination medium represented a major advancement in the development <strong>of</strong> culture<br />
pro<strong>to</strong>col. PPM is a broad spectrum biocide which targets enzymes in the citric acid cycle<br />
and electron transport chah in bacteria and fungus (PPM, 1998). PPM does not transverse<br />
ce11 walls <strong>of</strong> plants and therefore should not impede growth <strong>of</strong> plant tissues in culture<br />
(PPM, 1998). However, in expenments with Echinacea purpurea, stunting <strong>of</strong> seedlings,<br />
browning <strong>of</strong> tissues and reduced germination rates were observed at high levels <strong>of</strong> PPM.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se observations provide evidence <strong>of</strong> the need <strong>to</strong> optimize and minimize the use <strong>of</strong> PPM<br />
for individual plant species.<br />
In addition <strong>to</strong> the problems associated wiîh establishing sterile seedlings, Echinacea<br />
purpurea L. was found <strong>to</strong> be largely recalcitrant <strong>to</strong> regeneration and unresponsive <strong>to</strong> many<br />
plant growth regda<strong>to</strong>rs. In these studies, the cy<strong>to</strong>kinin BAP was the most effective growth<br />
regula<strong>to</strong>r for Echinacea purpurea L. culture while the induction <strong>of</strong> regeneration by the
synthetic compound TDZ was limited. <strong>The</strong> regenerative Eequency increased when TDZ<br />
and IAA were present in the induction medium. In many species TDZ was more effective<br />
than BAP for the induction <strong>of</strong> shoots (Heutteman and Preece, 1993; Lu, 1993; Murthy et<br />
al., 1998) and in several pro<strong>to</strong>cols, TDZ satisfied both the auxin and cy<strong>to</strong>kinin requirement<br />
for induction <strong>of</strong> somztic embryos (Visser et al., 1992; Murthy et al., 1998). Also, exposure<br />
<strong>to</strong> TDZ in the culture medium stimulated the accumulation <strong>of</strong> endogenous auxins and<br />
cy<strong>to</strong>kinins (Murthy et al., 1995). <strong>The</strong> current observation that BAI? was more effective<br />
than TDZ and that the action <strong>of</strong> TDZ can be modulated by exogenous auxin may be an<br />
indication <strong>of</strong> the biochemical processes unique <strong>to</strong> Echinacea tissues.<br />
A noteworthy observation <strong>of</strong> this study was indirect development <strong>of</strong> de novo shoots.<br />
Indirect morphogenesis is defined as the formation <strong>of</strong> callus on explants and the subsequent<br />
development <strong>of</strong> shoots or somatic embryos (Sharpe et al., 1980). Both his<strong>to</strong>logical and<br />
morphological observations indicated that a callus layer formed initially on some <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Echinacea purpurea L. petioles and that regenerated shoots onginated fiom within the<br />
callus. As a result, vasculature linking the shoots <strong>to</strong> the explant tissue was only sporadically<br />
visible in the undifferentiated mass <strong>of</strong> callus. In other petiole sections, the subepidermal<br />
cells did not dedifferentiate <strong>to</strong> produce callus and somatic embryos were observed <strong>to</strong> form<br />
on the epidermis.<br />
<strong>The</strong> fac<strong>to</strong>rs determining regenerative competence and the redirection <strong>of</strong> plant<br />
growth and development remain largely undefined however it is apparent from recent<br />
studies that nutritional, biochemical and environmental fac<strong>to</strong>rs can determine the<br />
developmental pathway <strong>of</strong> cornpetent cells. Skoog and Miller (1 957) hypothesized that the<br />
route <strong>of</strong> morphogenesis was deterrnined by the relative ratio <strong>of</strong> auxins and cy<strong>to</strong>kinins. As<br />
*
well, researchers have hypothesized that auxin is required for the induction and cy<strong>to</strong>kinin is<br />
required for the expression <strong>of</strong> regeneration in plant tissues (Steward et al., 1964). In<br />
cultures <strong>of</strong> Cicer arietinurn L., the expression <strong>of</strong> regeneration was shifted fiom shoot<br />
organogenesis <strong>to</strong> somatic embryogenesis was induced by supplementation <strong>of</strong> the culture<br />
medium with proline (Murthy et al., 1996a). <strong>The</strong> Echinacea purpurea L. regeneration<br />
system developed in the current studies <strong>of</strong>fers an unusual experïmental system for<br />
investigation <strong>of</strong> the fac<strong>to</strong>rs that favour sornatic embryogenesis since explants exposed <strong>to</strong><br />
the same culnire medium underwent different rnorphological processes. It is therefore<br />
possible <strong>to</strong> speculate that different levels <strong>of</strong> endogenous biomolecules predetermined the<br />
morphogenic potential <strong>of</strong> individual sections.<br />
<strong>The</strong> micropropagation system for Echninacea purpurea L. developed in this<br />
research will provide the basis for m e r investigations in<strong>to</strong> the regdation <strong>of</strong> plant<br />
morphogenesis, the quantification <strong>of</strong> the medicinally active biochemicals in Echinacea and<br />
will provide technologies for the mass production <strong>of</strong> high-quality Echinacea prrrpzwea L.<br />
for the commercial marketplace.
CHA PTER 4- REGENERA TION OF EC~ACEA PURPUREA HYPOCOTYL EXPLANTS V~il Srno T<br />
ORGANOGENE~~S AND SOMA TIC EMBR YOGENESIS<br />
Abstract<br />
Shoot organogenesis was induced on two-week-oId etiolated hypocotyls <strong>of</strong><br />
Echinacea purpurea. Various auxins and cy<strong>to</strong>kinins were compared in order <strong>to</strong> develop a<br />
regeneration system including NAA, BAP and TDZ. Optimal regeneration was observed<br />
in hypocotyls cultured on medium containing TDZ at high concentrations (20 p~-~-') for<br />
short durations (3 days) or at low concentrations (0.5 p~-~-l) for a longer tirne penod (12<br />
days). <strong>The</strong> cy<strong>to</strong>kinin BAP also induced shoot organogenesis at concentrations <strong>of</strong> 5 and 10<br />
p ~ - ~ for - a l period <strong>of</strong> 35 days. Somatic embryogenesis was induced via a callus phase<br />
onginating koom Echinacea purpurea hypocotyl explants. Hypocotyl sections were<br />
cultured on high concentrations <strong>of</strong> the auxin IBA <strong>to</strong> promote callus formation. <strong>The</strong><br />
callused explants were subsequently subcultured on the cy<strong>to</strong>kinin BAP for the induction <strong>of</strong><br />
sornatic embryogenesis. <strong>The</strong> resulting regenerants were transferred <strong>to</strong> gib berelIic acid<br />
(GA3) for fürther growth and proliferation. <strong>The</strong> procedure developed in this study provides<br />
an effective method <strong>of</strong> mass producing clonally superior Echinacea purpurea plants.
Introduction<br />
In the past decade plant tissue culture procedures have become usehl <strong>to</strong>ols for the<br />
horticultural industry. In vitro plant propagation methods developed allow for large-scale<br />
micropropagation, which increases breeding efficacy and decreases the breeding cycle for<br />
many crops (Altman & Ziv, 1997). This practice allows for the development <strong>of</strong> high<br />
quality crops, which have been selected for horticulturally desirable traits for example<br />
disease or pest resistance and stress adaptability (Altman & Ziv, 1997).<br />
Somatic embryogenesis is also a valuable <strong>to</strong>ol in plant tissue culture as regenerants<br />
arise fiom a single cell, a high nurnber <strong>of</strong> somatic embryos may form on small amounts <strong>of</strong><br />
tissue representing a high proliferation rate, and conversion <strong>of</strong> somatic embryos <strong>to</strong> artificial<br />
or synthetic seeds is possible (Mmhy & Saxena, 1998). As both cloning and genetic<br />
modification are possible, somatic embryogenesis is a valuable method for crop<br />
improvement through biotechnology (Sharpe et a1.,1980). Regeneration frorn callused<br />
cultures on the other hand has been show <strong>to</strong> result in genomic variation in regenerants,<br />
which are thought <strong>to</strong> arise during callus proliferation and the amount <strong>of</strong> variations may be<br />
directly proportional <strong>to</strong> the duration culture period (Qureshi & Saxena, 1992). Although<br />
this is not always desirable in some species, genetic variations rnay be a usehl <strong>to</strong>ol in<br />
improvement <strong>of</strong> medicinal plants as these changes may result in clones with higher levels<br />
<strong>of</strong> valuable secondary metabolites.<br />
An effective technique has previously been developed for the production <strong>of</strong> a shoot<br />
organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis system utilizing Echinacea purpzrrea petiole<br />
explants by exposure <strong>to</strong> a medium rontaining BAP only (Ch<strong>of</strong>fe et al., 2000). <strong>The</strong><br />
objectives <strong>of</strong> the current study was <strong>to</strong> develop an efficient micropropagation system for
Echinacea purpureu hypocotyl sections, preferably via somatic embryogenesis by<br />
pnmarliy exposing the explants <strong>to</strong> altered ratios <strong>of</strong> auxins and cy<strong>to</strong>kinins.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Establishmenr <strong>of</strong> Sterile SeedZings<br />
Echinacea purpzrrea achenes were soaked overnight in a 10% solution <strong>of</strong> Plant<br />
Preservation Mixture (PPM, 1998). <strong>The</strong> achenes were placed in a 250 ml flask. wrapped in<br />
foi1 and placed in a growth room at 2S°C with continuous shaking at 150 rpm (G10 New<br />
Brunswick Scientific Co. Inc., New Brunswick, NJ) for 16 hours. Echinacea achenes were<br />
removed fiom the PPM solution and rinsed under running water for 10 min. <strong>The</strong> seeds<br />
wer-e then surface sterilized by immersion in 70% ethanol for 30 sec, foIlowed by soaking<br />
in a commercial bleach solution (5.4% sodium hypochloride) containing one drop <strong>of</strong><br />
Tween 20 per 500 ml for 18 min, and three rinses with sterile deionized water. Fifieen<br />
disinfected seeds were cultured in 100 x 50 mm disposable Peti dishes (1Ydish)<br />
containing 25 ml <strong>of</strong> culture medium which was comprised <strong>of</strong> !4 strength MS salts<br />
(Murashige & Skoog, 1 962), !4 strength B5 vitamins (Garnborg et al., 1 968), 1 -5% sucrose,<br />
and 2 ml-L-' PPM. <strong>The</strong> pH <strong>of</strong> the medium was adjusted <strong>to</strong> 5.7 with NaOK and HCI. <strong>The</strong><br />
medium was solidified with 0.3 % gelrite (Gellum gum, Schweitzerhall Inc., South<br />
Plainfield, NJ) pnor <strong>to</strong> au<strong>to</strong>claving at 1.4 kg.cm-2 for 20 min and dispensed in<strong>to</strong> Petn<br />
dishes (25 mlldish). <strong>The</strong> Petri dishes were sealed by wrapping twice in parafilm and placed<br />
in a growth cabinet in complete darkness at 24OC for germination and seedling<br />
development (Appendix 1).
Induction <strong>of</strong> Direcr Regeneration<br />
Induction <strong>of</strong> regeneration was achieved by the addition <strong>of</strong> various plant growth<br />
regula<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> the media. Hypocotyl explants, L cm in length were cultured on a medium<br />
containing MS salts (Murashige & Skoog, 1962), B5 vitamins (Gamborg et al., l968), 3%<br />
sucrose and various plant growth regula<strong>to</strong>rs. <strong>The</strong> culture medium (pH 5.7) was solidified<br />
with 3% gelrite added before au<strong>to</strong>claving as previously described and dispersed in pre-<br />
sterilized Petri 100 x 50 mm disposable Petri dishes (25 mvdish). <strong>The</strong> treatments<br />
compared were NAA (0, 5 and 10 pmol-L-') and BAP (0, 5 and 10 pmol-~-') alone or in<br />
combination, and TDZ (0. 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 10, 15 and 20 pmol-L") for a duration <strong>of</strong> 3, 6, 9<br />
and 12 days.<br />
Al1 cultures were incubated in a growth cabinet at 25°C under 16 hour pho<strong>to</strong>period<br />
(40-60 pmol-rn'2-s-') cool white fluorescent light (Phillips, Scarborough, Ontario).<br />
Regeneration was quantified after 21 and 28 days for al1 cultures. Al1 treatrnents consisted<br />
<strong>of</strong> 10 Petri dishes per treatment with 6 hypocotyl explants per dish and al1 experiments<br />
were repeated at least twice. Statistical analysis was camied out using the Student<br />
Newman-Kuells means separation test <strong>of</strong> SAS (Statistical Analysis System Inc., 1995).<br />
Induction <strong>of</strong> Indirect Regenercztion<br />
<strong>The</strong> induction <strong>of</strong> regeneration was achieved by the addition <strong>of</strong> various plant growth<br />
regula<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> the medium. Hypocotyl explants, 1 cm in length were cultured on MS salts<br />
(Murashige & Skoog, 1962), B5 vitamins (Gamborg et al., 1968), 3% sucrose and IBA (50<br />
and 100 pnol-L-'). <strong>The</strong> culture medium (pH 5.7) was solidified with 0.3% gelnte added<br />
before au<strong>to</strong>claving as previously described and dispersed in pre-sterilized Petri 100 x 50<br />
mm disposable Petri dishes (25 ml/dish). Cultures were incubated in a growth cabinet at
2S°C under 16 hour pho<strong>to</strong>penod (40-60 pmol-m-2-s-') cool white fluorescent light (Phillips,<br />
Scarborough, Ontario) for a period <strong>of</strong> 4 weeks. Any roots which had formed from the<br />
callus were excised and discarded and callused hypocotyls were then subcultured <strong>to</strong> plates<br />
containing MS salts, B5 vitamins, 3% sucrose and BAP (2.5, 5, 7.5, 10 15 and 20 pmol-L-<br />
1 ), which had been adjusted <strong>to</strong> a pH <strong>of</strong> 5.7 and solidified with 0.3% gelnte before<br />
au<strong>to</strong>claving. Al1 treatments consisted <strong>of</strong> 10 Petri dishes per treatment with 6 hypocotyi<br />
explants per dish. Somatic embryos were excised fiom callused hypocotyls after 38 days<br />
<strong>of</strong> culture and subcultured on<strong>to</strong> MS media containing 1.45pmol-~-' GA3 for plantlet<br />
maturation and regeneration. Sornatic embryos were counted by hand and statistical<br />
analysis was carried out using the Student Newman-Kuells means separation test <strong>of</strong> SAS<br />
(Statistical Analysis System Inc., 1995).<br />
Resttlts<br />
Direct Shoot Organogenesis<br />
<strong>The</strong> addition <strong>of</strong> TDZ <strong>to</strong> the media resulted in an overall swelling <strong>of</strong> the hypocotyl<br />
tissues (Fig. 1). Quantitative observations indicated a significant decline in root<br />
organogenesis with increasing TDZ concentrations (Fig. 2). TDZ effectively induced de<br />
novo shoot organogenesis with the highest 6equency <strong>of</strong> regeneration at either 20 pnol-~-'<br />
for 3 days, producing 3.45 shoots/explant, or 0.5 pnol-~-' for 12 days, producing 3.73<br />
shoots/explant (Fig. 1 & 3). De novo shoot regeneration was also induced by the addition <strong>of</strong><br />
BAP <strong>to</strong> the culture medium with a maximal average <strong>of</strong> 2.81 shoots/hypocotyl at 5 Iimol-~'l<br />
(Fig. 4). Supplementation <strong>of</strong> the BAP medium with the auxin NAA significantly reduced<br />
the number <strong>of</strong> regenerants formed (Fig. 4), while NAA added <strong>to</strong> the media at al1
concentrations resulted in the formation <strong>of</strong> callus and completely inhibited root<br />
organogenesis (Fig. 5).<br />
Indirect Somatic Em bryogenesis<br />
Echinacea hypocotyl explants cultured on high concentrations <strong>of</strong> the auxin IBA<br />
produced green slightly compact callus formation (Fig 6). When subcultured on<strong>to</strong> basa1<br />
medium or medium supplemented wiîh BAP, the morphoIogy <strong>of</strong> the callus remained<br />
unchanged. At concentrations <strong>of</strong> BAP between 5 and 15 pnol-~-l the callus doubled in<br />
size by day 33 and continued <strong>to</strong> expand. Callus cultured subcultured ont0 basal medium or<br />
the medium containing low BAP concentrations aIso continued <strong>to</strong> produce roots, although<br />
the formation <strong>of</strong> de novo roots declined as BAP concentrations increased (Fig. 7). Somatic<br />
embryogenesis was apparent at al1 concentrations <strong>of</strong> BAP with the optimal treatrnents<br />
being 4 weeks <strong>of</strong> culture on 50 pmol.~-l IBA and subculture on 2.5, 5, 7.5 and 10 pmol-~-l<br />
BAP producing 6.0, 3.0, 3.2 and 4.1 roots/explant respectively, as well as the treatments <strong>of</strong><br />
100 pmol-~" IBA and 7.5 and 15 pmol-~-' BAP, which produced 6.9 and 5.7 roots/explant<br />
(Fig 8). Al1 stages <strong>of</strong> somatic embryogenesis were obsewed as early as 2 weeks after<br />
subculture ont0 B M (Fig. 9, 10 & Il) and this regeneration continued <strong>to</strong> increase up <strong>to</strong><br />
day 38 <strong>of</strong> subculture when-they were excised and transferred <strong>to</strong> GA3 for maturation.
Figure 1. Morphologie response <strong>of</strong> Echinacea puqurea hypocotyls <strong>to</strong> TDZ<br />
A. Overall swelling <strong>of</strong> hypocotyl explants cultured on 5 pMT1 TDZ for 20 days afier 33<br />
days <strong>of</strong> culture B. Shoot organogenesis from hypocotyl explants cultured on 20 @Id-'<br />
TDZ for 3 days after 33 days <strong>of</strong> culture
Figure 2. Effect <strong>of</strong> the concentration and duration <strong>of</strong> the cy<strong>to</strong>kinin TDZ on root<br />
organogenesis <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpzirea hypocotyls.<br />
ab Values within a column with different superscnpts are significantly different (P
O 0.5 1 2.5 5 1 O 15 20<br />
TDZ Concentration (pM)
Figure 3. Induction <strong>of</strong> shoot organogenesis on Echinacea purpurea hypocotyl explants in<br />
response <strong>to</strong> different TDZ concentrations and induction period on TDZ-supplemented<br />
medium.<br />
abc Values within a column with different superscripts are significantly different (P
abc<br />
O 0.5 1 2.5 5 10 15 20<br />
TDZ Concentration (pIM)
Figure 4. Effects <strong>of</strong> the auxin NAA and the cy<strong>to</strong>kinin BAP on shoot organogenesis<br />
Echinacea purpurea hypocotyl explants after 33 days.<br />
abdef Values within a column with different superscripts are significantly different (P
abc<br />
Control SBAP 10BAP 5BAP-t IOBAI?+ SBAP+ IOBAI?+ SNAA 10N.A<br />
SNAA SNAA IONAA IONAA<br />
Growth Regula<strong>to</strong>r Concentration (m
Figure 5. Effects <strong>of</strong> the auxin NAA and the cy<strong>to</strong>kinin BAP on root organogenesis<br />
Echinacea purpureu hypocotyl explants after 33 days.<br />
abcd Values within a column with different superscripts are significantly different pcO.OS).
Control 5 BA. IO BAP 5BAP+ 5BAP + 10 BAP+ 10 BAP+ 5 NAA IONAA<br />
SNAA 1ONAA SNAA 1ONAA<br />
Growth Regula<strong>to</strong>r Concentration (pM)
Figure 6. Callus formation on an Echinacea purpzlrea hypocotyl on 100 pmol-~-l IBA<br />
after 4 weeks <strong>of</strong> culture.
Figure 7. Effects <strong>of</strong> the auxin B A and the cy<strong>to</strong>kinin BAP on formation <strong>of</strong> root<br />
organogenesis fkom callused Echinacea pzirpurea hypocotyl explants after 33 days.<br />
abc Values within a colurnn with different superscripts are significantly different (Pe0-05).
50 50 50 50 50 50 50 100 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />
IBA IBA IBA 5 IBA IBA IBA 1BA IBA IBA IBA 5 IBA IBA IBA IBA<br />
2.5 BAP 7.5 10 15 20 2.5 BAP 7.5 10 15 20<br />
BAP BAP BAP BAP BAP BAP BAP BAP BAP BAP<br />
Treatrnent
Figure 8. Effects <strong>of</strong> the auxin B A and the cy<strong>to</strong>kinin BAI? on formation <strong>of</strong> somatic<br />
embryogenesis fiom callused Echinacea puqztrea hypocotyl explants afier 38 days.<br />
abc Values within a column with different superscripts are significantly different (P
50 50 50 50 50 50 50 IO0 100 100 100 100 IO0 100<br />
IBA IBA IBA 1BA IBA IBA IBA IBA IBA IBA IBA IBA IBA IBA<br />
25 5 75 10 15 20 2.5 S 7.5 10 15 20<br />
BAP BAP BAP BAP BAP BAP BAP BAP BAP BAP BAP BAP<br />
Treatment
Figure 9. Different stages <strong>of</strong> somatic embryogenesis formed fkom callus induced by<br />
culture <strong>of</strong> Echinacea hypocotyl explants on 100 pmol-L-l IBA and subcultured on 7.5<br />
pnol-L-1 BAP after 38 days <strong>of</strong> subculture with BAP.
Figure 1 O. Globular stage somatic embryos formed fiom hypocotyl explants <strong>of</strong> Echinacea<br />
purpurea L. cultured on 100 pnol-~" BA and 5 vmol-~-' BAP after 21 days <strong>of</strong> subculnire<br />
with BAP.
Figure 1 1. Heart shaped somatic embryos formed kom hypocotyl explants <strong>of</strong> Echinacea<br />
purpurea L. culhxed on 50 pmol-~" IBA and 2.5 pmol.~-l BAI? after 21 days <strong>of</strong> subculture<br />
with BAP.
Discrtssion<br />
As with Echinacea purpurea petiole explants, hypocotyls were also found <strong>to</strong> show<br />
relatively Iow rates <strong>of</strong> shoot organogenesis when compared with other species. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
results confirm our earlier observation that is a relatively recalcitrant species, potentially as<br />
a result <strong>of</strong> the unique complement <strong>of</strong> biornolecules. TDZ was found <strong>to</strong> be the most<br />
effective PGR for promoting regeneration.<br />
<strong>The</strong> cy<strong>to</strong>kinin TDZ has previously been found <strong>to</strong> induce somatic ernbryogenesis<br />
and shoot organogenesis in a range <strong>of</strong> recalcitrant species (Murthy et al., 1998; Lu, 1993).<br />
<strong>The</strong> results <strong>of</strong> this study show that TDZ was effective for induction <strong>of</strong> shoot orsanogenesis<br />
when the explants were exposed <strong>to</strong> hi& concentrations for a brief time period and also at<br />
low concentrations for a longer period. In contrast, another cy<strong>to</strong>kinin, BAP, was less<br />
effective for induction <strong>of</strong> regeneration. <strong>The</strong>se data indicate that the regenerative response<br />
observed in the TDZ cultures arose fi-om additional fac<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> the cy<strong>to</strong>kinin response and<br />
that there exists an intimate interaction between concentration and time as a requirement<br />
for induction. <strong>The</strong> mode <strong>of</strong> action <strong>of</strong> TDZ is not known but current findings indicate that<br />
TDZ-induced morphogenesis arises fiom the modulation <strong>of</strong> endogenous gowth regula<strong>to</strong>rs<br />
(Murthy et al., 1995; Hutchinson & Saxena., 1 W6),<br />
<strong>The</strong> most significant finding <strong>of</strong> this study was the induction <strong>of</strong> callus and somatic<br />
Embryogenesis by subsequent exposure <strong>of</strong> hypocotyls sections <strong>to</strong> auxin and cy<strong>to</strong>kinin. It is<br />
interesting in that this pattern <strong>of</strong> regeneration closely follow many valuable hypotheses as<br />
<strong>to</strong> the mode <strong>of</strong> action <strong>of</strong> plant growth regda<strong>to</strong>rs. <strong>The</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> the callused expIants <strong>to</strong><br />
continue <strong>to</strong> forrn de novo roots suggests that the tissue rnay have become habituated <strong>to</strong> the<br />
high auxin levels present in the media. Habituation is seen when tissues that normally
equire plant hormones such as auxins for growth suddenly lose this requirement and this<br />
phenornenon has been reported for many species. In the case <strong>of</strong> habituation the cells lose<br />
this endogenous auxin requirement but still retain the ability <strong>to</strong> produce roots. (Bennici &<br />
Bruschi, 1999; Droual et al., 1998; Krikorian, 1995; Kevers et al., 1981). Another<br />
hypothesis has been <strong>of</strong>fered by De Klerk (1997) who suggested that unlike the auxin IAA,<br />
which rapidly pho<strong>to</strong>-oxidizes in culture media, B A might be s<strong>to</strong>red for release when auxin<br />
levels are low.<br />
<strong>The</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> sornatic embryogenesis obtained when BAP was included in the<br />
media may be a result <strong>of</strong> auxin being released and acting with the cy<strong>to</strong>kinin <strong>to</strong> produce the<br />
balance <strong>of</strong> auxidcy<strong>to</strong>kinin necessary for regeneration (Skoog and Miller, 195 7). C y<strong>to</strong> kinin<br />
concentrations included in the medium in inverse proportion <strong>to</strong> the BA exposure was<br />
required thereby M e r supporting the concept that a delicate balance <strong>of</strong> auxinky<strong>to</strong>kinin is<br />
required for somatic embryogenesis.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se observations as well as the continued growth and formation <strong>of</strong> sornatic<br />
embryos will lead <strong>to</strong> some exciting future prospects. <strong>The</strong> prolific growth <strong>of</strong> the callus<br />
suggests that continued subcultures <strong>of</strong> the callus will provide a useful <strong>to</strong>ol in the Ion,- 0 term<br />
micropropagation <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpurea. It also <strong>of</strong>fers a valuable starting point for this<br />
method <strong>of</strong> in vitro propagation, which may be optimized by culturing explants on different<br />
types and concentrations <strong>of</strong> auxins and cy<strong>to</strong>kinins, varying pH levels, hormone levels and<br />
other amendments <strong>to</strong> the culture media such as proline. In all cases, the mass-production <strong>of</strong><br />
clonally supenor plantlets <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpurea may be obtained by the rnethods<br />
achieved in this study.
C~PTER 5. DE NOvo ROOT ORGANOGENESIS IN HYPOCOTYL AND COTYLEDON CULTURES OF<br />
ECHINA CEA PURPUREA L.<br />
A bstra ct<br />
An in vitro propagation system was developed for Echinacea purpurea L., a<br />
medicinal plant cornrnonly used in the treatment <strong>of</strong> colds, flu and related ailrnents. <strong>The</strong><br />
effects <strong>of</strong> the auxins IAA, DA and NAA included in MS media at concentrations ranging<br />
fiom 2.5 <strong>to</strong> 100 p ~.~-l were evaluated for their regeneration potentials. Root<br />
organogenesis from Echinacea purpurea hypocotyl explants was effectively induced by<br />
indolebutyric acid (BA) at concentrations ranging from 2.5 <strong>to</strong> 20 pM-L-'. Indoleacetic acid<br />
(IAA) levels <strong>of</strong> 2.5 <strong>to</strong> 5 @PL-', as well as 15 <strong>to</strong> 20 p ~-~-', were optimal for root induction<br />
and regeneration although this auxin was found <strong>to</strong> be less effective than BA, while<br />
treatments with naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) at dl levels (2.5 <strong>to</strong> 100 p ~-~-L) were<br />
ineffective for induction <strong>of</strong> root organogenesis. Direct root organogenesis was induced<br />
from IAA treatments at concentrations lower than 10 p ~ - ~ while - l concentrations behveen<br />
10 and 100 I i ~ - ~ promoted - l root organogenesis fiom an intemediate callus stage. <strong>The</strong><br />
results <strong>of</strong> this sîudy have established a micropropagation systern for Echinncea pzirpztrea<br />
that will provide stede plant material for further investigations in<strong>to</strong> medicinally active<br />
biochemicals and the mass production <strong>of</strong> high-quality Echinacea purpzrrea root tissues for<br />
the commercial market.<br />
introduction<br />
<strong>The</strong> development <strong>of</strong> in vitro regeneration systems for medicinal plant species has<br />
the potential <strong>to</strong> radically alter our approach <strong>to</strong> the production <strong>of</strong> plant-based medicines and<br />
in vitro propagation allows for selection and clonal multiplication <strong>of</strong> genetically superior
individuals, which rnay facilitate the development <strong>of</strong> improved varîeties (Murch et al.,<br />
2000). Pro<strong>to</strong>cols have recently been developed for regeneration <strong>of</strong> Echinacea plantlets via<br />
somatic embryogenesis and de novo shoot organogenesis h-om petiole explants (Ch<strong>of</strong>fe et<br />
al., 2000).<br />
Since commercial preparations <strong>of</strong> Echinacea are comrnonly made korn root tissues,<br />
in vitro pro<strong>to</strong>cols for root culture have the potential <strong>to</strong> improve commercial crop through<br />
the production <strong>of</strong> sterile, consistent plant material in a shorter time frarne than is common<br />
for field production. <strong>The</strong> development <strong>of</strong> micropropagation techniques for other<br />
rnedicinally important pIant species vaIued for their root products have been successful<br />
(Curtin, 1983). Ginseng is one such product in which numerous tissue culture techniques<br />
have been developed. <strong>The</strong>se techniques include somatic ernbryogenesis as well as well as<br />
callus and ce11 suspension cultures (Wang et al., 1999; Shoyarna et al., 1995; Furuya et al.,<br />
1986). <strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> micropropagation techniques for Ginseng <strong>of</strong>fer a more efficient way <strong>of</strong><br />
harvesting the active ginsenosides and polysaccharides produced by the species as the sarne<br />
chernical constituents are produced by entire plants are also available in culture (Choi,<br />
1988). <strong>The</strong>refore the overall objective <strong>of</strong> this research was <strong>to</strong> evaluate the morphogenetic<br />
capacity <strong>of</strong> hypocotyl and cotyledon explants <strong>of</strong> Echinacea pzqpztrea for root<br />
organogenesis in response <strong>to</strong> various concentrations <strong>of</strong> the naturally occurring auxins l u<br />
and B A and the synthetic auxin NAA.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Establishment <strong>of</strong> Siede SeedZings<br />
Pro<strong>to</strong>cols for the establishment <strong>of</strong> sterile seedlings were identical <strong>to</strong> those described<br />
previously (Chapter 4; Appendix 1).
Explant Culture<br />
After 14 days explants <strong>of</strong> hypocotyls (each km) and cotyledons [Whole (intact), 5<br />
mm, Distal (hrthest from the point <strong>of</strong> attachment <strong>to</strong> the hypocotyl) and Proximal (closest<br />
<strong>to</strong> the point <strong>of</strong> attachent <strong>to</strong> the hypocotyl] were cultured on a medium consisting <strong>of</strong> MS<br />
salts (Murashige & Skoog, 1962), B5 vitamins (Gamborg et al., 1968), 3% sucrose and<br />
various plant growth regula<strong>to</strong>rs [IAA, IBA and NAA (0, 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 20, 50 and 100<br />
prnol-~-']. <strong>The</strong> culture medium (pH 5.7) was solidified with 0.3% gelrite added before<br />
au<strong>to</strong>claving as previously described and dispersed in pre-sterilized Petri dishes (25<br />
rnl/dish).<br />
Al1 cultures were incubated in a growth cabinet at 25'C under 16 hour pho<strong>to</strong>period<br />
(40-60 pmol-m-2-d) cool white fluorescent light (Phillips, Scarborough, Ontario). Root<br />
regeneration was quantified by visual observations afler 21 and 28 days for al1 cultures.<br />
Al1 treatrnents consisted <strong>of</strong> 10 Petri dishes per treatrnent with either 6 hypocotyl explants or<br />
3 whole and 6 sectioned cotyledon explants per dish and al1 experiments were repeated at<br />
Ieast twice. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Student Newman-Kuells means<br />
separation test <strong>of</strong> SAS (Statistical Analysis System Inc., 1995).<br />
Results<br />
Regeneration <strong>of</strong> Hypocovl Explants<br />
<strong>The</strong> endogenous fûngal contamination <strong>of</strong> Echinacea seeds presented a difficult<br />
problem in seedling establishment. PPM has been recently developed specifically for<br />
tissue culture practices for the elimination <strong>of</strong> endogenous contamination <strong>of</strong> in vitro cultures<br />
(PPM, 1998). In earlier experimentation the optimal concentration <strong>of</strong> PPM in the seed<br />
semination medium was determined <strong>to</strong> be 3 ml-L-'. Higher concentrations <strong>of</strong> this mixture
were biostatic <strong>to</strong> Echhacea germination and lower amounts did not effectively eliminate<br />
fimgal growth (Ch<strong>of</strong>fe et al., 2000). However, despite this amendment <strong>of</strong> the PPM, seed<br />
germination was still less than 60%. It was subsequently found that the addition <strong>of</strong> MS salts<br />
and B5 vitarnins <strong>to</strong> germination media allowed for >99% germination and the<br />
establishment <strong>of</strong> healthy seedlings (Appendix 1).<br />
14 day-old hypocotyls cultured on media devoid <strong>of</strong> growth regula<strong>to</strong>rs produced an<br />
average <strong>of</strong> 0.5 - 2 roots/explant (Controls in Figs. 1, 2, 3, and 4). Supplementation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
culture medium with NAA did not result in root organogenesis (Fig. 2) while both IAA and<br />
IBA were fomd <strong>to</strong> effectively induce root formation (Figs. lB, C, and D). Rooting<br />
response was induced by al1 auxin supplementations and the regenerated roots appeared<br />
shorter and thicker than those in controls regardless <strong>of</strong> auxin type and concentration.<br />
Significantly more roots were induced on hypocotyls exposed <strong>to</strong> between 5 and 20~rnol-~-'<br />
BA (Figs. 3A and B). Root organogenesis fkom hypocotyls cultured on IBA at a11<br />
concentrations was preceded witb an intermediate callus phase. <strong>The</strong>re was a significant<br />
increase in the number <strong>of</strong> roots between day 21 and 28 for both cultures exposed <strong>to</strong> IBA<br />
and IAA (Figs. 3A & B and 4A & B). Hypocotyls exposed <strong>to</strong> high levels <strong>of</strong> IBA (100<br />
pmol-~-') continued <strong>to</strong> express root organogenesis even after 3 - 4 weeks <strong>of</strong> subculture<br />
ont0 MS basal media.<br />
A different pattern <strong>of</strong> regeneration was observed on hypocotyls sections cultured on<br />
the medium containing IAA (Figs. 4A and B). Significantly more roots formed on explants<br />
cultured with 5 and 15-20 pmol.~-' <strong>of</strong> IAA than were observed for any other treatrnent.<br />
Visual observations <strong>of</strong> the cultures indicated the potential for two distinct routes <strong>of</strong> root<br />
formation. At lower concentrations roots formed directly fiom the cut ends <strong>of</strong> the explant
(Fig. 1C) but at higher concentrations an intermediate callus phase was obsewed (Figs. 1B<br />
and D). Subsequent observations showed a distinct change in the developmental pathway<br />
from direct <strong>to</strong> indirect differentiation at IAA concentrations <strong>of</strong> 9 - 10 pmol-~-' (Figure 5).<br />
Regeneration <strong>of</strong> Cotyledon Explants<br />
Root organogenesis was also induced on cotyledonary explants <strong>of</strong> Echinacea<br />
seedlings. Root regeneration occurred both via an intermediate callus proliferation (Figs<br />
6A and B) and directly fkom the cut ends (Fig. 6C). Cotyledon explants showed the greatest<br />
response when cultured intact on 50 pnol.~-' BA producing an average <strong>of</strong> 9.7<br />
rootslexplant, and as both proximal and distal explants cultured on 15 pmol-~'i IE!A<br />
producing 9.1 rootdexplant (Fig. 7). included in the culture media at 10 pmol-~-i was<br />
found <strong>to</strong> induce 6.6 rootslintact cotyledon (Fig. 8), which was highest for the IAA<br />
treatments but significantly lower than IBA treatrnents.
Figure 1. Root organogenesis in cultured hypocotyl explants <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpzwea L.<br />
afier 28 days in culture.<br />
A. Echinacea hypocotyl cultured on basal media. Bar = 30 mm. B. Indirect root<br />
organogenesis on Echinacea hypocotyl explants on 5 pnol-~-' IBA. Note the initiation <strong>of</strong><br />
roots £Yom callus. Bar = 18 mm. C. Direct root organogenesis fiom cut ends <strong>of</strong> hypocotyl<br />
explant on 5 pmol-~-l IAA. Bar = 18 mm. D. Indirect root organogenesis on hypocotyl<br />
explanting the presence <strong>of</strong> 15 pnol-L" LAA. Note the development <strong>of</strong> callus. Bar = 5mm.
Figure 2. Root organogenesis <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpurea hypocotyl explants cultured on NAA<br />
after 28 days in culture.<br />
ab Values with a colurnn with different superscnpts are significantly different (P
O 2.5 5 7.5 I O 12.5 15<br />
NAA Concentration (pM)
Figure 3. Root organogenesis <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpurea hypocotyl explants cultured on EA.<br />
A. Effect <strong>of</strong> the auxin IBA on root organogenesis <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpurea hypocotyl<br />
explants after 21 days <strong>of</strong> culture. B. Effect <strong>of</strong> the auxin B A on root organogenesis <strong>of</strong><br />
Echinacea pulpurea hypocotyl explants after 28 days <strong>of</strong> culture.<br />
abc Values within a column with different superscnpts are significantly different (Pc0.05).
O 2.5 5 IO 15 20 50 100<br />
IBA Concentration (pw<br />
O 2.5 5 IO 15 20 50 100<br />
IBA Concentration (PM)
Figure 4. Root organogenesis <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpurea hypocotyl explants cultured on IAA.<br />
A. Effect <strong>of</strong> the auxin IAA on root organogenesis <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpurea hypocotyl<br />
explants after 21 days <strong>of</strong> culture. B. Effect <strong>of</strong> the auxin IAA on root organogenesis <strong>of</strong><br />
Echinacea purpurea hypoco tyl exp lants afier 28 days <strong>of</strong> culture.<br />
abc Values within a column with different superscripts are significantly different (P
O 2.5 5 10 15 20 50 100<br />
IAA Concentration (CLM)<br />
IAA Concentration (FM)
Figure 5. Effect <strong>of</strong> IAA concentration on root ongin (direct or indirect regeneration) in<br />
Echinacea purpurea hypocotyl explants after 28 days in culture.
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 23 14 15<br />
IAA Concentration (IcM)<br />
Route <strong>of</strong> Root<br />
Organogenesis<br />
Direct<br />
Indirect
Figure 6. Root organogenesis in cultured cotyledon explants <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpzirea L.<br />
after 28 days in culture.<br />
A. Indirect root organogenesis fiom an intact Echinacea cotyledon explant on 50 pmol-~-l<br />
BA. Bar = 9 mm. B. Indirect root organogenesis from a distal section <strong>of</strong> an Echinacea<br />
cotyledon explant on 15 pmol-~-L IBA. Bar = 15 mm. C. Indirect root organogenesis from<br />
a proximal section <strong>of</strong> an Echinacea cotyledon explant on 15 pmol-~-l IBA. Bar = 9 mm.
Figure 7. Effects <strong>of</strong> the auxin B A on root organogenesis <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpurea cotyledon<br />
explants after 28 days <strong>of</strong> culture.<br />
ab Values within a column with different superscripts are significantly different (P
IBA Concentration (CLM)
Figure 8. Effects <strong>of</strong> the auxin IAA on root organogenesis <strong>of</strong> Echinacea puvpzrrea<br />
cotyledon explants after 28 days <strong>of</strong> culture.<br />
abc Values within a column with different superscripts are significantly different (Pc0.05).
5 -<br />
4 -<br />
3 -<br />
2 - abc<br />
abc<br />
abc abc<br />
abc abc<br />
abc<br />
abc<br />
O 2-5 5 10 IS 20 50 100<br />
IAA Concentration (@f)<br />
. Whole<br />
Distal
Discussion<br />
<strong>The</strong> most significant results <strong>of</strong> this study are development <strong>of</strong> in vitro pro<strong>to</strong>cols for<br />
the induction <strong>of</strong> root organogenesis from both hypocotyl and cotyledon explants <strong>of</strong><br />
Echinacea exposed <strong>to</strong> the naturally occu~ng auxins IAA and [BA. <strong>The</strong> auxin BA was<br />
found <strong>to</strong> be the most effective for induction <strong>of</strong> root organogenesis while the synthetic auxin<br />
NAA was completely ineffective. At low concentrations <strong>of</strong> IAA (5 pnol.~-') rooting was<br />
observed at the cut ends <strong>of</strong> the hypocotyl explants and at higher concentrations (20 pmo1.L-<br />
1 ) through an intermediate callus phase. At intermediate concentrations <strong>of</strong> IAA, the root<br />
formation was significantly decreased. Closer observation <strong>of</strong> root organogenesis showed a<br />
decline in the amount <strong>of</strong> roots forming directly fiom the epidermis between 9 and 10<br />
,urnol.~-' MA and an increase in rooting fiom callus at the same concentrations. This<br />
observation shows the change in the developmental pathway from direct <strong>to</strong> indirect<br />
differentiation <strong>of</strong> Echtnacea purpurea hypocotyls occurs within these concentrations.<br />
Cotyledon explants <strong>of</strong> geranium have been shown <strong>to</strong> be highly responsive <strong>to</strong><br />
various hormonal treatments (Murthy et al., 1996b). Cells contained in the cotyledon<br />
region are highly regenerative have been shown <strong>to</strong> exhibit both root and shoot organogenic<br />
activity in culture (Murthy et al., 1995; Obeidy & Smith, 1993). <strong>The</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> a large<br />
number <strong>of</strong> root organogenesis fiom Echinacea cotyledon explants cultured on IAA and<br />
BA has also exhibited the regenerative ability and responsiveness <strong>of</strong> these explants <strong>to</strong><br />
auxin treatments. While removal <strong>of</strong> proximal sections <strong>of</strong> cotyledon explants <strong>of</strong> geranium<br />
cultures was detrimenta1 in that it inhibited regeneration (Murthy et al., 1996b), the culture<br />
<strong>of</strong> cotyledon explants in<strong>to</strong> distal or proximal sections <strong>of</strong> Echinacea did not affect root<br />
organogenesis. This observation along with the ability <strong>of</strong> these srna11 explant sections <strong>to</strong>
develop a higher amount <strong>of</strong> roots than the larger hypocotyl sections will provide a means <strong>to</strong><br />
optimize the micropropagation system <strong>of</strong> Echinacea.<br />
In general and in these expenments, callus is formed at the highest levels <strong>of</strong><br />
exposure <strong>to</strong> auxins (Skoog & Miller, 1957). It is interesting <strong>to</strong> note that roots were formed<br />
on sections exposed <strong>to</strong> M and B A but only callus wos observed on the sections exposed<br />
<strong>to</strong> NAA at any level. While differences in the mode <strong>of</strong> action <strong>of</strong> the three auxins are not<br />
known, Our results indicate significant differences in auxin strength in the promotion <strong>of</strong><br />
root organogenesis. From this data it appears that the efficiency <strong>of</strong> auxins for root<br />
organogenesis is IBA>IAA>NAA.<br />
In preliminary experiments, Echinacea explants continued <strong>to</strong> grow when transferred<br />
<strong>to</strong> liquid culture. <strong>The</strong> development <strong>of</strong> a micropropagation procedure <strong>to</strong> produce roots fiom<br />
hypocotyl tissue may then be expanded <strong>to</strong> include proliferation in a bioreac<strong>to</strong>r system.<br />
This system may then be utilized <strong>to</strong> produce large amounts <strong>of</strong> stenle root tissues for<br />
analysis, purification, extraction and standardization <strong>of</strong> their active ingredients.
CHAPTER 6: I?ESI/LTS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS<br />
<strong>The</strong> overall objective <strong>of</strong> this thesis was <strong>to</strong> develop a micropropagation system for<br />
Echinacea purpurea. an increasingly valuable crop in the Canadian and worId herbal<br />
markets. Plant material for Echinacea products are normally collected fiom the wild or<br />
from field grown plants, ar,d problems with this practice include: a) contamination <strong>of</strong> the<br />
plant matenal with insects, hngi and bacteria, b) the length <strong>of</strong> time required for production<br />
<strong>of</strong> a saleable product, c) plant-<strong>to</strong>-plant and year-<strong>to</strong>-year variability in the active components<br />
<strong>of</strong> the plant matenal and d) the lack <strong>of</strong> pure standardized plant material for analysis.<br />
Micropropagation is a valuable <strong>to</strong>ol for the medicinal plant industry, as it allows for the<br />
production <strong>of</strong> sterile, consistent plant material for biochernical characterization and<br />
commercial production.<br />
<strong>The</strong> most significant findings <strong>of</strong> the thesis were:<br />
I. Echinacea purpurea petioles exposed <strong>to</strong> the cy<strong>to</strong>kinin BAP h e d both somatic<br />
embryos and shoots.<br />
3. Hypocotyl explants <strong>of</strong> Echinacea pulpurea formed de novo shoots when cultured<br />
on a medium containing the plant growth regda<strong>to</strong>r TDZ at high concentrations for<br />
short penods <strong>of</strong> tirne or low concentrations for longer time penods.<br />
3. Hypocotyl explants <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpurea cultured ont0 IBA for 4 weeks were<br />
induced <strong>to</strong> fom callus. Subculture <strong>of</strong> the calli on a medium containing BAP<br />
resulted in somatic embryogenesis.<br />
4. Echinacea purpurea root organogenesis was induced on hypocotyl and cotyledon<br />
explants cultured on a media supplemented with either the auxin BA, or the auxin<br />
IAA. <strong>The</strong> optimal concentration <strong>of</strong> IBA was between 5 and 15 j ~~-l-'.
<strong>The</strong> results <strong>of</strong> this research program provide new evidence <strong>of</strong> a difference in<br />
morphogenic response <strong>of</strong> various plant tissues <strong>to</strong> the same inductive stimulus.<br />
Organogenesis and sornatic embryogenesis were both induced on Echinacea petiole<br />
explants cultured on the cy<strong>to</strong>kinin BAP only. <strong>The</strong>se findings indicate that it is possible <strong>to</strong><br />
have different morphogenic responses kom the same type <strong>of</strong> tissue explant exposed <strong>to</strong> the<br />
sarne plant growth regula<strong>to</strong>r. In contrast, hypocotyl explants exposed <strong>to</strong> cy<strong>to</strong>kinins<br />
produced de novo shoots but pretreatrnent <strong>of</strong> the same tissue with an auxin led <strong>to</strong> a two-<br />
stage regenerative response. <strong>The</strong> initial exposure <strong>to</strong> auxin induced callus formation and<br />
exposure <strong>of</strong> the callus <strong>to</strong> cy<strong>to</strong>kinin resulted in somatic embryogenesis. Previous<br />
researchers have found evidence that both explant source and plant growth regula<strong>to</strong>rs were<br />
crucial for the expression <strong>of</strong> morphogenesis (Steward et aI., 1964; Skoog & Miller, 1957).<br />
<strong>The</strong>se findings confirm the earlier hypothesis but fiuther indicate that the endogenous<br />
metabolites <strong>of</strong> the tissues cm affect the morphogenetic cornpetence.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se findings provide new opportunities for both the study <strong>of</strong> rnedicinal plant<br />
physiology and for the medicinal plants industry. <strong>The</strong> regeneration systems developed for<br />
Echinacea purpurea may be used as model systems for the establishment <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>to</strong>cols for<br />
study <strong>of</strong> the unique physiology <strong>of</strong> medicinal plants. Together, these expenments have<br />
established optimized pro<strong>to</strong>cols for the mas-production <strong>of</strong> Echinacea. Medicinal plant<br />
species produce a variety <strong>of</strong> active secondary metabolites, and the availability <strong>of</strong> sterile<br />
plant matena1 is the first prerequisite for biochemical characterization. By utiIizing the in<br />
vitro techniques developed for Echinacea as a model system, researchers will have a <strong>to</strong>ol<br />
for the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the active ingredients <strong>of</strong> this species as well as for other medicinal<br />
plant species producing similar arrays <strong>of</strong> chemical compounds.
In addition, the ability <strong>to</strong> mass produce Echinacea purpurea in sterile culture<br />
environments provides new technologies for the medicina1 plant industry. In vitro culture<br />
will allow for the production <strong>of</strong> consistent products. For example, it is now possible <strong>to</strong><br />
produce Iarge quantities <strong>of</strong> root tissues in a bioreac<strong>to</strong>r. Another application <strong>of</strong> these<br />
technologies may be the selection and mass, clona1 propagation <strong>of</strong> superior individuals<br />
within the Echinacea population. With these techniques it is possible <strong>to</strong> identiQ and select<br />
lines <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpurea with higher leveIs <strong>of</strong> medicinal compounds or resistance <strong>to</strong><br />
disease.
References<br />
Alfermann, A.W. & Petersen, M. 1995. Natural product formation by plant ce11<br />
biotechnology. Plant Ce11 Tiss. Org. Cult. 43: 199-205.<br />
Altman, A. & Ziv. M. 1997. Horticultureal biotechnology: a his<strong>to</strong>rical perspective and<br />
future prospects. In: Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the Third International ISHS Symposium on<br />
In Vitro Culture and Horticultural Breeding. (ed. A. Altman & M. Ziv). Acta Hort.<br />
446. pp. 3 1-49.<br />
Barrett, B., Kiefer, D. & Rabago, D. 1999. Assessing the risks and benefits <strong>of</strong> herbal<br />
medicine: an overview <strong>of</strong> scientific evidence. Alt. <strong>The</strong>r. 5(4):40-49.<br />
CC., Baskin, J.M. & H<strong>of</strong>hann, G.R. 1992. Seed dormancy in the prairie forb<br />
Echinacea angustifoh var. angustifoiia (Asteraceae): afiempening pattern during<br />
cold stratification. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153(2):239-243.<br />
Baskin, LM., Snyder, K.M. & Baskin, C.C. 1994. Misapplied name <strong>of</strong> the purple<br />
coneflower in the ecological studies <strong>of</strong> John E. Weaver. Torr. Bot. Club.<br />
12 1(1):73-75.<br />
Bauer, R. 1998. <strong>The</strong> Echinacea s<strong>to</strong>ry - the scientific development <strong>of</strong> an herbal<br />
irnmunostimulant. In: Plants for food and medicine. (ed. H.D.V. Prendergast, N.L.<br />
Etkin, D.R. Harris and P.J. Hough<strong>to</strong>n). pp. 3 17-332. Royal Botanical Gardens,<br />
Kew.<br />
Bennici, A. & Bruschi, P. 1999. Stability <strong>of</strong> habituation in Nicotiana bigeiovii var.<br />
bigelovii shoots regenerated from habituated cellus. Plant Sci. 143 : 1 95- 1 99.<br />
Beran, D.D., Gaussoin, R.E. & Masters, R.A. 1999. Native wildflower establishment<br />
with imidazolinone herbicides. HortSci. 34(2):283-286.
Bernath, J. 1986. Production ecology <strong>of</strong> secondary plant products. J. Herbs Spices<br />
Med. Plants. 1 : 185-234.<br />
Burger, R.A., Torres, A.R., Warren, R.P., Caldwell, V.D. & Hughes, B.G. 1997.<br />
Echiacea-induced cy<strong>to</strong>kine production by human macrophages. [nt. J.<br />
Imrnunopharmac. l9(7):371-379.<br />
Ch<strong>of</strong>fe, K.C., Vic<strong>to</strong>r, J.M.R., Murch, S.J. & Saxena, P.K. 2000. In vitro regeneration <strong>of</strong><br />
Echinacea puqmrea L.: Direct somatic embryogenesis and indirect shoot<br />
organogenesis in petiole culture. In Vitro Ce11 Dev. Biol-Plant. 36(1):30-36.<br />
Choi, K.T. 1988. Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer: micropropagation and the in vitro<br />
production <strong>of</strong> saponins. In: Biotechnology in Agriculture and forestry, Vol. 4,<br />
Medicinal and Arornatic Plants 1 (ed. Y.P.S . B ajaj) . Springer-Verlag, Berlin,<br />
Heidelberg. pp. 484-500.<br />
Clarke, A. 1999. Healthy and tasty. Too good <strong>to</strong> be true? I. Int. Food hg. 554-56.<br />
Curtin, M.E. 1983. Harvesting pr<strong>of</strong>itable products fiom plant tissue culture.<br />
Bi<strong>of</strong>ïech. 649-659.<br />
Coeugniet, E. G. & Elek, E. June 1987. Immunomodulation with viscum album and<br />
Echinacea purpurea extracts. Onkologie 27-33.<br />
De Klerk, G.J, Ter Brugge, J. & Marinova, S. 1997. Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> indoleacetic acid,<br />
indolebutyric acid and naphthaleneacetic acid dunng adventitious root formation in<br />
vitro in Malus 'Jork 9'. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 49:39-44.<br />
Derr, J.F. 1993. Wildflower <strong>to</strong>lerance <strong>to</strong> me<strong>to</strong>lachlor and me<strong>to</strong>Iachlor combined with<br />
other broadleaf herbicides. HortSci. 28(10): 1023-1026.
DiCosrno, F. & Misawa, M. 1995. Plant ce11 and tissue culture: alternatives for<br />
metabolite production. Biotech. Adv. 13 :425-453.<br />
Driedger, S.D. 1997. Cold cornfort. A mineral and a herb win supporters in the battle<br />
against sniffles. Macleans. Feb. 2454-55.<br />
Droual, A-M., Hamdi, S., Creche, J., Kevers, C. & Rideau, M. 1998. Au<strong>to</strong>nomy <strong>to</strong> plant<br />
growth regula<strong>to</strong>rs and gene expression in penwinkle cultures in vitro. I. Plant<br />
Physiol. 153 :623-630.<br />
Facino, R.M., Carini, M., Aldini, G., Saibene, L., Pietta, P. & Mauri, P. 1995.<br />
Echinacoside and caffeoyl conjugates protect collagen fiom fiee radical-induced<br />
degradation: a potential use <strong>of</strong> Echinacea extracts in the prevention <strong>of</strong> skin<br />
pho<strong>to</strong>damage. Planta Med. 6 1 :5 10-5 14.<br />
Furuya, T., Yoshikawa, T., Ushiyama, K. & Oda, H. 1986. Formation <strong>of</strong> plantlets fkom<br />
callus cultures <strong>of</strong> ginseng (Panax ginseng). Experientia. 42: 193- 194.<br />
Gamborg, O. L., Miller, R. A. & Ojima, K. 1968. Nutrient requirements <strong>of</strong> suspension<br />
cultures <strong>of</strong> soybean root cells. Exp. Cell. Res. 50: 15 1 - 15 8.<br />
Hobbs, C. 1989. <strong>The</strong> Echinacea handbook. (ed. M. Miovich). Eclectic Medical<br />
Publications, Portland, Oregon.<br />
Huetîeman CA & Preece JE,. 1993. Thidianiron: A potent cy<strong>to</strong>klliin for woody plant<br />
tissue culture. Plant Ce11 Tissue Organ Cult. 33: 105-1 19.<br />
Hutchinson, M.J. & Saxena, P.K. 1996. Acetylsalicylic acid enhances and synchronizes<br />
thidiazuron-induced somatic embryogenesis in geranium (Pelargonium X hor<strong>to</strong>nim<br />
Bailey) tissue cultures. Plant Ce11 Rep. 15(7):512-5 15.
laziri, M., Zhiri, A., Guo, Y-W, Dupont, J-P, Shimomura, K-, Hamada, H., Vanhaelen,<br />
M. & Homes, J. 1996. Taxus sp. Cell, tissue and organ cultures as alternative<br />
sources for taxoids production: a literature survey. Plant Ce11 Tiss. Org. Cult.<br />
4659-75.<br />
Jensen W. A., 1962. Botanical his<strong>to</strong>chemistry. San Francisco: W.H. Freernan.<br />
Kabaganian, R., Carrier, D.J., & Sokhansanj, S. 1999. Post-harvest characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />
Echinacea angustifo2ia root. ASAE/CS AE Int. Meeting. 99604 1 : 1 -9.<br />
Kevers, C., Coumans, M., DeGreef, W., H<strong>of</strong>inger, M. & Gaspar, T. 198 1. Habituation in<br />
sugarbeet callus: auxin content, auxin protec<strong>to</strong>rs, peroxidase pattern and inhibi<strong>to</strong>rs.<br />
Physiol. Plant. 5 1 :28 1-286.<br />
Kindscher, K. 1992. Medicinal wild plants <strong>of</strong> the prairie lawrence. University Press <strong>of</strong><br />
Kansas. p. 86.<br />
Kindscher, K. 1989. Ethnobotany <strong>of</strong> purple coneflower (Echinacea angzutifolia,<br />
Asteraceae) and other Echinacea species. Economic Bot. 43(4):498-507.<br />
Klausner, A. 1998. EN'S herbal medicine cabinet: <strong>to</strong>p 10 herbs you cm trust, part 2.<br />
Env. Nut. 1998 23(5):1-3.<br />
Krikonan, A.D. 1995. Use <strong>of</strong> auxins, cy<strong>to</strong>kinins, and other growth regula<strong>to</strong>rs for callus<br />
induction and maintenance. In: Plant Hormones. Physiology, Biochemistry and<br />
Molecular Biology, (ed. P.J. Davies) Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, <strong>The</strong><br />
Netherlands, pp. 778.<br />
Leuttig, B., Steinmuller, Gifford, G.E., Wagner, K. & Lohmann-Matthes, M.L. 1989.<br />
Macrophage activiation by the polysaccharide arabinogalactan isolated fkom plant<br />
ce11 cultures <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpureo. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 8 1 (9):669-675.
Li, T.S.C. 1998. Echinacea: cultivation and medicinal value. HortTech. 8: 122- 129-<br />
Lu C-Y. 1993. <strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> thidiazuron in tissue culture. Cell. Dev. Biol. 29: 92-96.<br />
Malik, K.A. & Saxena, P.K. 1992. Regeneration in Phaseolus vulgaris L.: high-<br />
fiequency induction <strong>of</strong> direct shoot formation in intact seedlings by<br />
~~-benz~lamino~urine and thidiazuron. Planta. 186:384-3 89.<br />
Mengs, U., Clare, C. B. & Poiley, J. A. 199 1. Toxicity <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpurea.<br />
Arzneirn.-Forsch-Drug Res. 41 (1 1): 1076-1 O8 1.<br />
Mize, C.W., Koehler, K.J. & Comp<strong>to</strong>n, M.E. 1999. Statistical considerations for in vitro<br />
research: II - data <strong>to</strong> presentation. In Vitro Cell, Dev. Biol. 35: 122- 126.<br />
Muller-Jakic, B., Breu, W., Probstle, A., Redl, K., Greger, H. & Bauer, R. 1993. In<br />
vitro inhibition <strong>of</strong> cyclooxygenase and 5-liboxygenase by alkamides fkom<br />
Echinacea and AchiZZea species. Planta Med. 6O:3 7-40.<br />
Murashige, T. & Skoog, F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with<br />
<strong>to</strong>bacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15:473-497.<br />
Murch S.J., Ch<strong>of</strong>fe, K.L., Vic<strong>to</strong>r J.M.R., Slimmon T.Y., KrishnaRaj S. and P.K. Saxena<br />
2000. Thidiazuron-induced regeneration Eom hypocotyl cultures <strong>of</strong> St. John's wort<br />
(Hypericum perferatum cv. Anthos) Plant Ce11 Reports 19:576-5 8 1.<br />
Murthy, B.N.S., Murch S.J. & Saxena, P.K. 1998. Thidiazuron: A potent regula<strong>to</strong>r <strong>of</strong> in<br />
vitro plant morphogenesis. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant 34:267-275.<br />
Murthy, B.N.S. & Saxena, P.K. 1998. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration <strong>of</strong><br />
neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.). Plant Ce11 Rep. l7:469-475.
Murthy, B.N.S., Vic<strong>to</strong>r, J., Singh, R.P., Fletcher, R.A. and Saxena, P.K. 1996a. In vitro<br />
regeneration <strong>of</strong> chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): Stimulation <strong>of</strong> direct organogenesis<br />
and somatic embryogenesis by thidiazuron. Plant Growth Reg. 19:233-240.<br />
Murthy, B.N.S., Singh, R.P. & Saxena, P.K. 1996b. Induction <strong>of</strong> high-fiequency<br />
somatic embryogenesis in geranium (Pelargoniurn x horrontm Bailey cv Ringo<br />
Rose) cotyledonary cultures. Plant Ce11 Rep. l5:423-426.<br />
Murthy, B NS., Murch, S.J. & Saxena P.K. 1995. Thidiazuron-induced somatic<br />
embryogenesis in intact seedlings <strong>of</strong> peanut (Araclzis hypogaea L.): endogenous<br />
growth regula<strong>to</strong>r levels and significance <strong>of</strong> cotyledons. Phys. Plant 94:268-276.<br />
Ness, J., Sherman, F.T., Pan, C.X. 1999. Alternative medicine: what the data Say about<br />
common herbal therapies. Geriatrics. 54(1):33-43.<br />
Nilsson, O. & Olsson, O. 1997. Getting <strong>to</strong> the root: the role <strong>of</strong> the Agrobacterium<br />
rhizogenes rol in the formation <strong>of</strong> hairy roots. Physiol. Plant. 100:463-473.<br />
Obeidy, A.A. & Smith, M.A.L. 1993. Organogenesis fiom mature pecan cotyledons and<br />
embryonic axes. HortSci. 28(3):2 13-2 15.<br />
O'Hara, M., Kiefer, D., Farrell, K. & Kemper, K. 1998. A review <strong>of</strong> 12 commonly used<br />
medicinal herbs. Arch. Fam. Med. 7523-536.<br />
Pill, W.G. & Haynes, J.G. 1996. Gibberellic acid during priming <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpurea<br />
(L.) Moench seeds improves performance after seed s<strong>to</strong>rage. J. Hort. Sci.<br />
71 (2):287-295.<br />
PPM - Plant Preservation Mixture. Plant Cell Technology, Inc. 1998. Washing<strong>to</strong>n,<br />
D. C. ti ttp://wu \\ .pp1114plm t-tc.ç~n~ippm.h tm.
Pras, H., Woerdenbag, H.J., Uden, W.V. 1995. Bioconversion <strong>of</strong> plant enzymes for the<br />
production <strong>of</strong> pharmaceuticals. Plant Ce11 Tiss. Org. Cult. 43 : 1 17- 12 1.<br />
Qureshi, J.A. & Saxena, P-K- 1992. Adventitious shoot induction and somatic<br />
embryogenesis with intact seedlings <strong>of</strong> several hybrid seed geranium (Pelargonizirn<br />
x horrorum Baily) varieties. Plant Ce11 Rep. 1 1 :443-448.<br />
Rehman, J., Dillow, J.M., Carter, S.M., Chou, J., Le, B. & Maisel, AS. 1999. Increased<br />
prodution <strong>of</strong> antigen-specific irnrnunoglobulins G and M following in vivo<br />
treatment wiîh the medicinal plants Echinacea angustifolia and Hydrastic<br />
Canadensis. hm. Leîî. 68:39 2-395.<br />
Rether, B., Pfohl-Leszkowicz, A., Guillemaut, P. & Keith, G. 1990. Benzo(a)pyrene<br />
induces nuclear-DNA adducts in plant ce11 suspension culture. FEBS. 263(1): 172-<br />
174.Richman, A. & Witkowski, J.P. 1997. Echinacea $1 in natural food trade.<br />
HerbalGram. 4 1 53.<br />
Richman, A. & Witkowski, J.P. 1997. Echinacea #1 in natural food trade. HerbalGram.<br />
4153.<br />
Roesler, J., Steinmüller, C., Kiderlen, A., Emmendorffer, A., Wagner, H. & Lohmam-<br />
Matthes, M-L. 199 1. Application <strong>of</strong> purified polysaccharides from ce11 cultures <strong>of</strong><br />
the plant Echinacea purpurea <strong>to</strong> rnice mediates protection against systemic<br />
infections with Listeria monocy<strong>to</strong>genes and Candida albicans. Int. J.<br />
Immunopharrnac. 13(1):27-37.<br />
SAS Institute. 1995. Statistical analysis systems users= guide: statistics version 6. SAS<br />
Institute, Cary, N.C.<br />
Schardt, D. Apnl 1998. Still out in the cold. Nutrition Action Health Letter.
Schollhorn, C., Schecklies, E. & Wagner, H. 1993. Immunochemical investigations <strong>of</strong><br />
polysaccharides £kom Echinacea purpurea ce11 suspension cultures. Planta Med.<br />
59(Suppl):A662-663.<br />
Schulthess, B .H., Giger, E. & Baumam, T. W. 199 1. Echinacea: ana<strong>to</strong>my,<br />
phy<strong>to</strong>chemical pattern, and germination <strong>of</strong> the achene. Planta Med. 57:384-388.<br />
Sharpe, W. R., Sondhal, M. R., Caldar, R. S. & Maraffa, S. B. 1980. <strong>The</strong> physiology <strong>of</strong> in<br />
vitro asexual embryogenesis. HorticulturaI Reviews. 2:268-3 10.<br />
Shoyama, Y., Matsushita, H., Zhu, X.X. & Kishira, H. (1995) Somatic embryogenesis<br />
in ginseng (Panax species). In: Bajaj, Y.P.S. (ed.) Biotechnology in Agriculture<br />
and Forestry, Vol. 3 1 Somatic Embryogenesis and Synthetic Seed II. Springer-<br />
Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.<br />
Skoog, F. & Miller C. 0. 1957. Chernical regulation <strong>of</strong> growth and organ formation in<br />
plant tissues cultured in vitro. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 1 1 : 1 1 8- 140.<br />
Small, E. & Catling, P.M. 1999. Canadian medicinal crops. NRC Research Press,<br />
Ottawa. pp. 46-52.<br />
Snedecor, G.W. & Cochran, W.G. 1989. Statistical methods, eighth edition. Iowa State<br />
University Press, Ames, Iowa. pp. 223.<br />
S teinmuller, C., Roesler, J., Grottrup, E, Franke., G., Wagner, H. & Lohmann-Matthes,<br />
M.-L. 1993. Polysaccharides isolated from plant ce11 cultures <strong>of</strong> Echinacea<br />
putpurea enhance the resistance <strong>of</strong> irnmunosuppressed mice against systemic<br />
infections with Candida albicans and Listeria mon oc<strong>to</strong>genes. Int. J.<br />
Immunopharmac. 15(5):605-6 14.
Steward, F.C., Mapes, M.O., Kent, A.E. & Holsten, R.D. 1964. Growth and<br />
development <strong>of</strong> cultured plant cells. Biochemical and morphogenic studies with<br />
cells yield new evidence on their metabolism and <strong>to</strong>tipotency. Science 113:20-27.<br />
Stimpel, M., Proksch, A., Wagner, H. & Lohmann-Matthes, M.-L. 1984. Macrophage<br />
activation and induction <strong>of</strong> macrophage cy<strong>to</strong><strong>to</strong>xicity by purified polysaccharide<br />
fractions kom the plant Echinacea purpurea. M. Imm. 46(3):845-849.<br />
Thorpe, T. 1994 Morphogenesis and regeneration. In: Plant ce11 and tissue culture (ed.<br />
LK. Vasil & T.A. Thorpe). pp. 17-36. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,<br />
Netherlands.<br />
Tragni, E., Galli, CL., Tubaro, A., Del Negro, P. & Della Loggia, R. 1988. Anti-<br />
inflamma<strong>to</strong>ry activity <strong>of</strong> Echiancea angustifolia fractions separated on the basis <strong>of</strong><br />
molecular weight. Pharm. Res. Comrn. 20(supp.):87-90.<br />
Tragni, E., Tubaro, A., Melis, S. & Galli, C.L. 1986. Evidence from two classic<br />
irritation tests for an anti-inflarnrna<strong>to</strong>ry action <strong>of</strong> a natural extract, ecninacina B.<br />
Food Chem. Toxic. 23(2):3 17-3 19.<br />
Trypsteen, M., Lijsebettens, M.V., Severen, RX. & Montagu, M.V. 1991.<br />
Agrobacteriurn rhizogenes mediated transformation <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purpurea. Plant<br />
CeIl Rep. 10:85-89.<br />
Visser, C., Qureshi J.A., Gill R., Malik K.A. & Saxena P.K. 1992. Morphoregula<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
role <strong>of</strong> thidiazuron: Substitution <strong>of</strong> auxin and cy<strong>to</strong>kinin requirement for the<br />
induction <strong>of</strong> somatic embryogenesis in geranium hypocotyl cultures. Plant Physiol.
Wagner, H. 1999. Phy<strong>to</strong>medicine research in Germany. Env. Health Persp.<br />
1 1 O7(lO):779-78 1.<br />
Wagner, H., Stuppner, H., Schafer, W. & Zenk, M. 1988. Immunologically active<br />
polysacchandes <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purprrrea ce11 cultures. 27(1): 1 19-126.<br />
Wang, X., Proc<strong>to</strong>r, J.T.A., KrishnaRaj, S., Saxena, P.K. & Sullivan, J.A. 1999. Rapid<br />
somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in American ginseng: effects <strong>of</strong><br />
auxins and explants. J. Ginseng Res. 23(3): 148-1 63.<br />
Whatley, K. 1 999. Boost your irnmunity with Echinacea. Healinggarden. Jan/Feb .: 14<br />
Willipmann, I., Egert, D., Bodinet, C. & Beuscher, N. 1993. Chernical and<br />
immunological properties <strong>of</strong> the immunornodula<strong>to</strong>ry active compounds fkom the<br />
roots <strong>of</strong> different Echiancea species. Planta bled. 59(Suppl):A67 1 -672.
APPEND~XI: THE DE VELOPMENT OF STERiLlZLi TïûN PROCEDURES FOR ECHINACEA PURPURE.4 L.<br />
ACHENES<br />
Echinacea purpurea seeds used throughout this thesis showed an extremelly high degee <strong>of</strong><br />
endogenous fimgal contamination. Sterilization procedures rnost comrnonly used in for<br />
plant tissue culture proved inadequate for Echinacea and thus more stnngent techniques<br />
were developed <strong>The</strong> development occurred through numerous steps, which ultimately<br />
resulted in approximately 99% contamination Bee cultures. <strong>The</strong> steps leading <strong>to</strong> the<br />
successful generation <strong>of</strong> contamination free seed cultures are laid out in the following tabIe:
Table 1 : Sterilization methods and results for Echinacea purpurea achenes.<br />
Sterilriation Process<br />
1. 30 sec dip in 70% ethanol<br />
18 min ernmersion in 5.4% sodium<br />
hypochIoride<br />
solution containing one drop <strong>of</strong> Tween 20 per<br />
500 mi<br />
3 rinses in sterile disti11ed water<br />
Seeds cultured on water agar (8 g-l-')<br />
2. Seed coat removed<br />
Seeds stedized and cultured as in step #1<br />
3. Seeds sterilized as in step #1.<br />
Seeds cultured on water agar (8 g-~-')<br />
supplemented with 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 ml-1-' PPM<br />
4. Seeds soaked in full strength PPM for<br />
15 and 30 minutes<br />
50% <strong>of</strong> seeds were then stedized as in<br />
#1 and 50% were plated directly<br />
Each treatment cultures containing:<br />
- water agar containing O or 0.5 ml-1-'<br />
PPM<br />
- !4 strength MS media containing O<br />
or 0.5 ml-1-' PPM<br />
5. Seeds treated as in step #5 with<br />
treatments also including cultures<br />
containing full strength MS media<br />
containing O or 0.5 ml-1-' PPM<br />
6. Repeated step #5 soaking instead for 30<br />
and 60 minutes<br />
1 7. Seeds soaked in full strength PPM for<br />
30, 60 minutes and overnight<br />
Seeds sterilized as in step #I<br />
Seeds plated ont0 the following<br />
FeatmentS:<br />
water agar, !A or full strength MS media<br />
supplemented with O or 0.5 ml-1-' PPM<br />
8. Seeds soaked in fi111 strenght PPM for 1<br />
hour or 2 hours and in a 5% PPM<br />
solution overnight<br />
Seeds are sterilized as in step $1<br />
Seeds cultured on !4 or hl1 strength MS media<br />
supplemented with 0, 0.5 or 1 ml-1-' PPM<br />
9. Seeds soaked in 5, 10 and 20% PPM<br />
solution overnight<br />
Seeds are sterilized as in step #1<br />
Seeds cultured on '/z strength MS media<br />
1 supplernented with ml-1.' PPM<br />
-<br />
Results<br />
100% contamination<br />
100% contamination<br />
[PPM]3 ml-1- Higher percentage <strong>of</strong> clean plates.<br />
Auch browning and stuÏ-iting <strong>of</strong> explants<br />
Al1 seeds plated directly (without sterilîzation) were<br />
stunted and brown<br />
Optimal conditions resulted in 50% contamination<br />
free cultures<br />
Results as for step #4<br />
Results as for step M<br />
Resuits as for step #4<br />
Much less contamination and healthier growth was<br />
observed in treatrnents consisting <strong>of</strong> overnight soak<br />
in PPM and plates containing % strength MS media<br />
supplemented with 1 ml-1-' PPM<br />
Overnight soaks in a 10% PPM solution followed<br />
by the treatrnent described resulted in virmally 99%<br />
contamination free plates and healthy growth <strong>of</strong><br />
Echinacen purpurea seedlings
APPENDIXE T m s PUBLEA T/ONS<br />
Ch<strong>of</strong>fe, K.C., Vic<strong>to</strong>r, J.M.R., Murch, S.J. & Saxena, P.K. 2000. In vitro regeneration <strong>of</strong><br />
Echinacea purpureu L.: Direct somatic embryogenesis and indirect shoot<br />
organogenesis in petiole culture. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol-Plant. 36(1):30-36.<br />
Ch<strong>of</strong>fe, K.C., Murch, S.J. & Saxena, P.K. 2000. Regeneration <strong>of</strong> Echinacea purprrrea L.:<br />
Induction <strong>of</strong> root organogenesis from hypocotyl and coty1edon explants. Plant Ce11<br />
Tiss. Org. Cult. (In Press).