04.08.2013 Views

1 Continuous Time Processes - IPM

1 Continuous Time Processes - IPM

1 Continuous Time Processes - IPM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

While we have eliminated the case of instantaneous transitions, there is<br />

nothing in the definitions that precludes having an infinite number transitions<br />

in a finite interval of time. It in fact a simple matter to construct<br />

continuous time Markov chains where infinitely many transitions in finite<br />

interval occur with positive probability. In fact, since the expectation of an<br />

exponential random variable with parameter λ is 1 , it is intuitively clear<br />

λ<br />

that if λi’s increase sufficiently fast we should expect infinitely transitions in<br />

a finite interval. In order to analyze this issue more closely we consider a<br />

family T1, T2, . . . of independent exponential random variables with Tk having<br />

parameter λk. Then we consider the infinite sum <br />

k Tk. We consider the<br />

events<br />

[ <br />

Tk < ∞] and [ <br />

Tk = ∞].<br />

k<br />

The first event means there are infinitely many transitions in a finite interval<br />

of time, and the second is the complement. It is intuitively clear that if<br />

the rates λk increases sufficiently rapidly we should expect infinitely many<br />

transitions in a finite interval, and conversely, if the rates do not increase<br />

too fast then only finitely many transitions are possible infinite time. More<br />

precisely, we have<br />

Proposition 1.1.1 Let T1, T2, . . . be independent exponential random variables<br />

with parameters λ1, λ2, . . .. Then <br />

k 1<br />

<br />

< ∞ (resp. λk k 1 = ∞)<br />

λk<br />

implies P [ <br />

k Tk < ∞] = 1 (resp. P [ <br />

k Tk = ∞] = 1).<br />

Proof - We have<br />

E[ <br />

Tk] = 1<br />

,<br />

k<br />

and therefore if <br />

k 1<br />

λk < ∞ then P [ Tk = ∞] = 0 which proves the first<br />

assertion. To prove the second assertion note that<br />

Now<br />

k<br />

k<br />

λk<br />

E[e − <br />

Tk ] = E[e −Tk ].<br />

E[e −Tk ] =<br />

k<br />

∞<br />

P [−Tk > log s]ds<br />

◦<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!