Web Site News As Of May 20, 2008 - AT&T Clec Online

clec.att.com

Web Site News As Of May 20, 2008 - AT&T Clec Online

Web Site News As Of May 20, 2008

Welcome to the Performance Measurements web site for Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio & Wisconsin.

March 2008 results are now available for Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio & Wisconsin.

Effective May 05:

Recalculated and Reposted Performance Measures:

Listed below are the measures for which previously reported results have been recalculated and reposted. AT&T

makes available a listing of the recalculated and reposted performance measurement results that have also been

restated (changed from the originally posted result) in the Reports section of this website. These reports are available

for both CLEC-aggregate results and CLEC-specific results, and are accessed in the same manner as existing

performance measurement reports.

July through November 2007 results for performance measures 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 49, 50, 55, 56, and 58 have

been recalculated and reposted to add coding inadvertently omitted during a system upgrade that resulted in some

retail records not being reported.

Please Note:

Implementation of the 2006 Six-Month Review performance measurement changes took place with December

2007 performance results. Due to system limitations, the following two situations should be noted. First, certain

results for Michigan performance under Version 2.5 PMs are appearing on the website under the Version 3.0 PM.

For example, PM 58 results in Michigan are appearing under PM 29. This is a display only issue - the results have

been generated under the Version 2.5 logic with appropriate remedy treatment. You may see this issue under

PMs 6, 22, 29, 30, 35, 37.1, 38, 39, 40, 41, and 63. Programming has been initiated to correct this issue.

Measures discontinued under Business Rules Version 3.0 continue to be reported in Michigan under Business

Rules Version 2.5. Notes have been entered as required on all submeasures to reflect how measures are being

reported to accommodate the limitations of our system. Second, the pre-December 2007 results for the Version

2.5 PMs (and submeasures) that were combined in Version 3.0 are listed under the respective Version 3.0

measures. For example, November 2007 results for PM 58 appear under PM 29 for all PM 58 submeasures

reported in Version 3.0 PM 29. While the pre-December 2007 results continue to be reported per the Version 2.5

Rules, this approach enables the user to view consecutive months of data in one report query. Version 2.5 PMs

that were combined in Version 3.0 are PM 6 (combined PMs 7.1, 10, MI 13, and 17.1), PM 22 (combines PMs 22,

22.1, and 25), PM 29 (combines PMs 29, 45, 56.1, 58, 73, 91, and 96), PM 30 (combines PMs 30, 47, and 60),

PM 35 (combines PMs 35, 46, 59, 98), PM 37.1 (combines PMs 37.1, 54.1, 65.1), PM 38 (combines PMs 38 and

66), PM 39 (combines PMs 39, 52, 67, 76 and 119), PM 40 (combines PMs 40 and 68), PM 41 (combines PMs 41,


66), PM 39 (combines PMs 39, 52, 67, 76 and 119), PM 40 (combines PMs 40 and 68), PM 41 (combines PMs 41,

53, 69), and PM 63 (combines PM 63 and 75).

The AT&T Raw Data Web Site was posted on May 5, 2008 and can be accessed via the link provided at the very

bottom of this page (labeled "Raw Data Request Process"). March data is available for PMs 1.1, 1.3, 4, 5, 7.1, 10,

12, 13, 13.1, 17, 21.1, 22, 22.1, 24.1, 25, 29-30, 35, 37.1, 38-41, 43-47, 49, 50, 52, 53, 54.1, 55, 55.2, 56, 56.1,

58-60, 62, 63, 65.1, 66-71, 73, 75, 76, 78, 91, 96-102, 104, 105, 107, 109, 110, 112-115.2, 117, 119-120, 124,

124.1, CLEC WI 1, CLEC WI 5, CLEC WI 6, CLEC WI 7, CLEC WI 8, CLEC WI 9, CLEC WI 11, C BLG 3, C BLG 4,

C BLG 5, IN 1, MI 2, MI 11, MI 13, MI 15, WI 1, WI 2 and WI 9.

As noted here with the April 20, 2006 posting, AT&T has discovered a problem with the Affiliate results for PM

65.1 8dB Loop measurement for the states of Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, and Wisconsin. The number of loops

identified as "in-service" in calculating the Affiliate 8dB Trouble Report Rate has been found to be overstated.

While the correct volume is being identified, the following steps have been taken: 1) March 2006 through current

results are reported against the Retail compare only - no Affiliate result has been generated; and 2) Remedies for

February 2006 through current have been calculated against Retail only, as Affiliate performance is expected to

improve once the correct volume is determined and restatement is made. Once the correct in-service volume has

been determined, February and March 2006 results (and any subsequent months affected) will be restated, with

any additional remedies due CLECs, or overpayments made by AT&T, handled according to the terms of the

applicable remedy plan.

More magazines by this user
Similar magazines