09.08.2013 Views

3. Situation analysis issue context phase 1 - Wageningen UR

3. Situation analysis issue context phase 1 - Wageningen UR

3. Situation analysis issue context phase 1 - Wageningen UR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Planning Strategically<br />

Analysis of problems, Issues and Visions<br />

and planning strategically<br />

Kumasi, Ghana, 2008<br />

<strong>Wageningen</strong> International


Issues <strong>analysis</strong> what is it?<br />

A critical <strong>issue</strong> = usually a complex situation, event<br />

or trend that is likely to affect the project and its<br />

organisation.<br />

Issue <strong>analysis</strong> = an assessment of the external and<br />

internal environmental factors that are likely to have<br />

the greatest impact on the future of the project and<br />

project organisation.


Key questions: problems & <strong>issue</strong>s<br />

What problems or <strong>issue</strong>s are central to the project?<br />

What are the main problems or concerns of the<br />

different stakeholder groups and how do these<br />

relate to the focus of the project?


Importance of <strong>analysis</strong> of problems and <strong>issue</strong>s<br />

To increase relevance:<br />

by ensuring that the project will focus on the real (felt)<br />

problems, real (felt) needs<br />

by creating a common understanding of the current<br />

situation and a shared vision for the future<br />

And thereby increasing impact


Definition: opportunities / strategies <strong>analysis</strong><br />

The process of identifying & analysing the various<br />

opportunities / strategies to realise the visions<br />

The process of deciding which (combination of)<br />

strategies will definitely have to be chosen for the<br />

project to really make an impact on solving the<br />

main problem


Tools: problems & <strong>issue</strong>s <strong>analysis</strong><br />

Problem tree<br />

Rich picturing<br />

Matrix ranking<br />

Secondary data<br />

Focus group discussions<br />

Historical Analysis<br />

Issue <strong>analysis</strong><br />

Card technique, etc etc<br />

See http://portals.wi.wur.nl/msp/


Definition: <strong>analysis</strong> of visions<br />

The process of identifying & analysing what changes<br />

the project / programme / organisation would like to<br />

bring about<br />

Vision: also called ‘development goal’ or ‘overall<br />

objective’


Key questions: visions & opportunities<br />

What changes would different stakeholder groups<br />

like to see the project bring about?<br />

Generally what visions, hopes or dreams do different<br />

stakeholders have and are there implications for the<br />

project?<br />

What opportunities do stakeholders see for realizing<br />

their visions?


Importance of <strong>analysis</strong> of visions & opportunities<br />

To identify realistic changes in the current situation<br />

of beneficiaries or of an organisation<br />

To increase impact


Tools: visions & opportunities <strong>analysis</strong><br />

Objectives tree (cause & effect linkages)<br />

Flow diagram<br />

Rich picturing<br />

Role play<br />

Visioning<br />

Matrix ranking<br />

Decision matrix<br />

Resource mapping<br />

Pocket chart, wall chart etc etc


Group work<br />

Group 1: problem/<strong>issue</strong> <strong>analysis</strong><br />

Group 2 and 3: vision/opportunities <strong>analysis</strong><br />

Each of the tools described is facilitated by another<br />

group member. Feedback on facilitation is<br />

provided.


Feedback for participant facilitator<br />

Remember:<br />

feedback on what happened (facts), not on personality<br />

neutral<br />

Feedback on what went well & what could be<br />

improved, first by participant facilitator, then by<br />

group, then by course facilitator.


Feedback guidelines<br />

Descriptive (instead of evaluating or making a judgement)<br />

Specific, concrete & clear<br />

Take into account the needs of the ‘receiver’<br />

Useful, requested / wanted<br />

At the right time<br />

Correct<br />

Express impact in ‘I statement’ to stress own<br />

observations and feelings (subjectivity)<br />

Check whether message is understood<br />

Check feedback with other people


Group work<br />

option 1:<br />

Problem tree<br />

Objectives tree<br />

Clustering<br />

Scoping<br />

scoring (decision matrix)<br />

Option 2:<br />

Visioning<br />

Conceptual model (flow diagram)<br />

Matrix ranking


Decision matrix example<br />

S e le c tio n c rite ria S tra te g y 1 S tra te g y 2 S ra te g y 3 S tra te g y 4<br />

R e le v a n c e 4 1 2 3<br />

C o s t 1 3 2 4<br />

S u s ta in a b ility 2 4 1 3<br />

S u b to ta l 7 8 5 1 0<br />

F e a s ib le in te rm s o f<br />

tim e<br />

P a rtic ip a tio n b y<br />

s ta k e h o ld e rs<br />

T e c h n ic a l c a p a c ity<br />

a v a ila b le<br />

3 2 4 1<br />

1 4 2 3<br />

1 4 3 2<br />

T O T A L 1 2 1 8 1 4 1 6


Matrix Ranking<br />

Criteria 1<br />

Criteria 2<br />

Criteria 3<br />

Criteria 4<br />

Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 3


Option 1<br />

Problem / <strong>issue</strong> <strong>analysis</strong>:<br />

problem tree<br />

Objective<br />

Vision / opportunities <strong>analysis</strong>:<br />

Objectives tree<br />

Clustering<br />

Scoping<br />

Scoring (decision matrix)


Problem tree / hierarchy the steps<br />

Brainstorm problems – each problem one card (phrase as negative<br />

situation)<br />

Place core problem (or 'starter problem') at the top of the model.<br />

Core problem is the one with most of the other problems underlying<br />

and with serious effects.<br />

Identify direct causes of the starter problem. Place these underneath<br />

the starter problem.<br />

Check whether the direct causes are independently leading to the<br />

starter problem.


Problem tree / hierarchy the steps<br />

Identify direct effects of the starter problem. Place these above the<br />

starter problem.<br />

Check whether the direct effects are independently resulting from<br />

the starter problem.<br />

Identify underlying causes of the 'direct causes', starting from left.<br />

Check for independance.


Problem hierarchy example<br />

Easier<br />

access to<br />

forests<br />

Adapted from Materials Developed by ITAD<br />

Increased<br />

lopping of<br />

branches for<br />

firewood<br />

Increased price<br />

of firewood<br />

Increased<br />

deforestation<br />

Population<br />

increase<br />

Increased<br />

demand for<br />

land<br />

Agricultural<br />

encroachment<br />

into forests<br />

Decreased<br />

agricultural<br />

production<br />

Department of<br />

Forests unable to<br />

enforce park<br />

boundaries<br />

Effects<br />

Causes


Objectives tree / hierarchy the steps<br />

Turn all the problems (negative situations) into objectives<br />

(positive, realized future states) starting from top<br />

Objectives should be realistically and ethically achievable<br />

Add important causeeffect relationships<br />

Check causeeffect relationships:<br />

as meansend relationships<br />

for validity and completeness<br />

delete unnecessary objectives<br />

draw connecting lines


A hierarchy of results<br />

Widespread<br />

use of fuelefficient<br />

stoves<br />

Balance<br />

between<br />

extraction and<br />

regeneration<br />

Reduced price<br />

of fuel wood<br />

and other<br />

fuels<br />

Reduced<br />

deforestation<br />

Reduced<br />

population<br />

Reduced<br />

demand for<br />

land<br />

Reduced<br />

agricultural<br />

encroachment<br />

Improved surveillance of<br />

boundaries by Department<br />

of Forests<br />

Increased<br />

agricultural<br />

productivity<br />

Ends<br />

Means


Strategies <strong>analysis</strong><br />

Clustering:<br />

To create a simple overview of objectives in terms of<br />

similarity in sector, activity or expertise<br />

Scoping:<br />

To focus down the choice of a goal for the project by<br />

making explicit priorities for project implementation<br />

Preliminary choice of intervention strategies<br />

Scoring:<br />

Decision on choice of actions / strategies


Clustering steps<br />

Start at the bottom of the objectives tree to cluster<br />

(group) objectives in terms of same sector /<br />

activity / expertise.<br />

Work sidewards (same level) then upwards (next level)<br />

Draw dotted line around the cluster.<br />

Name the cluster.<br />

Repeat 13 for rest of objectives.


Scoping and scoring steps<br />

Scoping: identify clusters outside scope of project<br />

Eliminate clusters that can NOT be achieved by the implementing<br />

agency and mark with asterisk (*).<br />

Scoring (decision matrix):<br />

Broadly discuss content of clusters / strategies.<br />

Develop scoring / selection criteria.<br />

Indicate order of priority of criteria (column 1).<br />

Make a decision matrix of alternative approaches / strategies by<br />

criteria.<br />

Mark approaches (each strategy in another column):<br />

• The more positive, the higher the score<br />

Identify (combination of) key approaches /strategies.


Option 2<br />

Vision / opportunities <strong>analysis</strong>:<br />

Visioning<br />

Conceptual model (flow diagram)<br />

Matrix ranking


Dreams realized or visioning<br />

Purpose: to have a focused discussion around people’s<br />

dreams or shared visions for the future of a project or other<br />

activity.<br />

Working from a vision helps to open up people’s minds to<br />

other ways of overcoming problems, rather than the<br />

standard ways of solving problems.<br />

Asking people to describe how they would like the project to<br />

be in the future (indicate period: 3 years )


Dreams realized or visioning<br />

Eg “What are the characteristics of the ideal situation we<br />

wish to achieve here in 3 years time?” or to finish the<br />

sentence “I know that my vision for this situation has been<br />

achieved when I see……” Imagine you have to give a<br />

presentation to your target group:<br />

Personal reflection (510 min): brainstorm ideas & describe<br />

/symbolize key vision on card.<br />

Sharing in group (1015 min): discuss ideas and agree on 1 vision.<br />

Draw the dreams and visualize them with symbols.<br />

Specify dreams in the discussion, with clear time frames for<br />

achievement.


Conceptual modeling (flow diagram / chart)<br />

Purpose:<br />

to identify the links between factors that influence an ideal<br />

situation or vision that the stakeholders would like to<br />

achieve.<br />

Steps:<br />

Define / describe / symbolize vision or ideal situation on<br />

a card and place on a flipchart.<br />

Brainstorm on factors that influence this vision (cards).<br />

Draw links between these factors and the vision and<br />

between each other.


Matrix ranking purpose<br />

To make a relative comparison between different<br />

options of a specific <strong>issue</strong> or solutions to a<br />

problem, and to make detailed <strong>analysis</strong> of how<br />

much and why people prefer one option above the<br />

other.


Matrix ranking steps<br />

Review the flow diagram and identify strategies to reach the<br />

vision (describe each strategy on one card).<br />

Place each strategy in a different column.<br />

Discuss criteria (each criteria one card) and place in column<br />

1.<br />

Decide on maximum score (same maximum score for each<br />

criteria).<br />

Use e.g. pins for dividing the maximum number of points<br />

(pins) among the different strategies: high = positive.<br />

Score the strategies by reaching consensus.<br />

Select key strategies.


Thank you!<br />

© <strong>Wageningen</strong> <strong>UR</strong><br />

© <strong>Wageningen</strong> <strong>UR</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!