12.08.2013 Views

final_program_abstracts[1]

final_program_abstracts[1]

final_program_abstracts[1]

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

11 IMSC Session Program<br />

Constraining climate sensitivity by natural interannual<br />

variability in the CMIP3 ensemble<br />

Thursday - Parallel Session 2<br />

D. Masson and R. Knutti<br />

Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Switzerland<br />

The climate sensitivities of the CMIP3 climate models used in the IPCC AR4 report<br />

cover a range from about 2 to 5 K. Although much of the information contained in<br />

observation datasets has already been used to calibrate these models, it is difficult to<br />

find an observational constraint to get a more accurate uncertainty estimate of the true<br />

climate sensitivity. Such a problem can partly be circumvented by using a large<br />

ensemble of perturbed physics climate models where parameters have not been<br />

calibrated to mimic observation. This technique estimates the parametric uncertainty<br />

of a model but not the structural uncertainty. Because CMIP3 is the only ensemble<br />

that samples structural uncertainty, it is important to derive confidence interval based<br />

on it using observable constraints.<br />

Wu and North (JGR, 2003) found a possible relationship between internal variability<br />

and climate sensitivity in an older set of global climate models. Its application to the<br />

present CMIP3 ensemble predicts a climate sensitivity between 2.45 and 3.95 K (95%<br />

confidence interval) using the ERA40 observation data. The constraint on climate<br />

sensitivity relies on the interannual variability surface temperature of individual<br />

calendar months. The internal variability of each 12 calendar months is first computed<br />

at the grid-point scale on a common T42 resolution and then globally averaged.<br />

Summer months are less variable than winter months and the ratio of these two<br />

variances correlates positively with climate sensitivity. The origin of this correlation<br />

is still not fully clear, but understanding why internal variability correlates to climate<br />

sensitivity may provide a new constraint to improve climate models and reduce their<br />

spread in the future.<br />

Abstracts 240

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!