WAYNE BARKER, ARTIST’S MONOGRAPH
Published 2000 in association with Chalkham Hill Press
Published 2000 in association with Chalkham Hill Press
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
After the considerable amount of unpublished<br />
material I have read about Wayne Barker's work, I find it<br />
somewhat strange that the artist should ask me to<br />
contribute to this publication. After all, it was I who accused<br />
him during the last Standard Bank national drawing<br />
competition, over a decade ago, of "playing silly games"<br />
and of "shameless self- promotion." The outcome of this<br />
exchange was, for some, and undoubtedly Barker, that a<br />
reversal had taken place. I had become the mouthpiece<br />
representing an authority "dominated by patronising white<br />
experts." Long before the change to a democratic<br />
government a new cultural political correctness had arrived.<br />
The days of judging art, especially judging art for no<br />
remuneration, were nearing the end. The question of<br />
who was capable of judging whom, who represented<br />
who, and who was acceptable to all parties made the<br />
task unenviable and became a political minefield. Wayne<br />
Barker has always had problems with authority both at<br />
the level of the individual and that of a system. In fact any<br />
young artist who does not possess a healthy degree of<br />
irreverence against previous art systems has some cause<br />
for concern. Brancusi believed this of Rodin at the<br />
beginning of the<br />
twentieth<br />
century,<br />
and contemporary<br />
British<br />
sculptors still<br />
insist that every<br />
generation<br />
should commit<br />
patricide of their previous masters. After Henry Moore,<br />
their sentiments are comprehensible.<br />
In South Africa, the tradition of artists waiting<br />
interminably for the nod from a commercial gallery or<br />
museum curator to exhibit their work is still in existence.<br />
But an alternative group of artists began to question the<br />
traditions of this system more than ten years ago. Wayne<br />
Barker was certainly one of them. Audacious, truculent,<br />
witty, highly critical and iconoclastic, the works he produced<br />
and the alternative venues that he found and encouraged<br />
artists to use, posed a genuine alternative to the existing<br />
system. Most artists felt more comfortable in the somewhat<br />
confined area of only making art works. The possibility of<br />
an artist challenging the domain of museum curator and<br />
orchestrating contentious exhibitions with work from<br />
different and sometimes jumbled perspectives was initiated<br />
and encouraged by Barker. Though much of the work was<br />
not purchased that was by no means an indication of the<br />
quality of the shows. The South African art public had<br />
generally been used to logical and sequential exhibitions<br />
which dealt with single themes and comprehensible<br />
parameters. For artists to curate cutting-edge exhibitions<br />
without the experience and qualifications of seasoned<br />
museologists was both foreign and risqué. This was one<br />
important contribution that should not be underestimated<br />
when summing up this artist's creative output. It requires<br />
as much ingenuity as the making of an artwork itself.<br />
Superficially, Barker's work often possesses a cavalier<br />
quality and his personality appears to be that of a cultural<br />
cowboy reminiscent of the young Robert Rauschenburg<br />
of the mid 1950s in North America. The cultivating of a<br />
persona also seems for some artists to be an inextricable<br />
4