15.08.2013 Views

WAYNE BARKER, ARTIST’S MONOGRAPH

Published 2000 in association with Chalkham Hill Press

Published 2000 in association with Chalkham Hill Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

After the considerable amount of unpublished<br />

material I have read about Wayne Barker's work, I find it<br />

somewhat strange that the artist should ask me to<br />

contribute to this publication. After all, it was I who accused<br />

him during the last Standard Bank national drawing<br />

competition, over a decade ago, of "playing silly games"<br />

and of "shameless self- promotion." The outcome of this<br />

exchange was, for some, and undoubtedly Barker, that a<br />

reversal had taken place. I had become the mouthpiece<br />

representing an authority "dominated by patronising white<br />

experts." Long before the change to a democratic<br />

government a new cultural political correctness had arrived.<br />

The days of judging art, especially judging art for no<br />

remuneration, were nearing the end. The question of<br />

who was capable of judging whom, who represented<br />

who, and who was acceptable to all parties made the<br />

task unenviable and became a political minefield. Wayne<br />

Barker has always had problems with authority both at<br />

the level of the individual and that of a system. In fact any<br />

young artist who does not possess a healthy degree of<br />

irreverence against previous art systems has some cause<br />

for concern. Brancusi believed this of Rodin at the<br />

beginning of the<br />

twentieth<br />

century,<br />

and contemporary<br />

British<br />

sculptors still<br />

insist that every<br />

generation<br />

should commit<br />

patricide of their previous masters. After Henry Moore,<br />

their sentiments are comprehensible.<br />

In South Africa, the tradition of artists waiting<br />

interminably for the nod from a commercial gallery or<br />

museum curator to exhibit their work is still in existence.<br />

But an alternative group of artists began to question the<br />

traditions of this system more than ten years ago. Wayne<br />

Barker was certainly one of them. Audacious, truculent,<br />

witty, highly critical and iconoclastic, the works he produced<br />

and the alternative venues that he found and encouraged<br />

artists to use, posed a genuine alternative to the existing<br />

system. Most artists felt more comfortable in the somewhat<br />

confined area of only making art works. The possibility of<br />

an artist challenging the domain of museum curator and<br />

orchestrating contentious exhibitions with work from<br />

different and sometimes jumbled perspectives was initiated<br />

and encouraged by Barker. Though much of the work was<br />

not purchased that was by no means an indication of the<br />

quality of the shows. The South African art public had<br />

generally been used to logical and sequential exhibitions<br />

which dealt with single themes and comprehensible<br />

parameters. For artists to curate cutting-edge exhibitions<br />

without the experience and qualifications of seasoned<br />

museologists was both foreign and risqué. This was one<br />

important contribution that should not be underestimated<br />

when summing up this artist's creative output. It requires<br />

as much ingenuity as the making of an artwork itself.<br />

Superficially, Barker's work often possesses a cavalier<br />

quality and his personality appears to be that of a cultural<br />

cowboy reminiscent of the young Robert Rauschenburg<br />

of the mid 1950s in North America. The cultivating of a<br />

persona also seems for some artists to be an inextricable<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!