- Page 1: Energy Development and Technology 0
- Page 6 and 7: III.B Intake-to-Generation Ratio Re
- Page 8 and 9: Figures Figure 1. Percentage of tot
- Page 10 and 11: Figure 39. Interquartile box plots
- Page 12 and 13: Table 25. Multiplicative factors to
- Page 15 and 16: I. Introduction Electricity generat
- Page 17 and 18: Table 1. Selected 2000 emission inv
- Page 19 and 20: Parallel with this change have been
- Page 21 and 22: 7 Table 3. Efficiencies and emissio
- Page 23 and 24: other measures (Kyle et al., 2001).
- Page 25 and 26: considering DG technologies and by
- Page 27 and 28: production in 1999 in eGRID (i.e.,
- Page 29 and 30: Table 4. Summary of the “existing
- Page 31 and 32: Table 5. Summary of the hypothetica
- Page 33 and 34: Marina Landfill Pebbly Beach Salina
- Page 35 and 36: 21 Table 6. Characteristics relevan
- Page 37 and 38: 23 Footnotes for Table 6 Data sourc
- Page 39 and 40: 25 Table 8. Characteristics relevan
- Page 41 and 42: San Francisco San Jose Los Angeles
- Page 43 and 44: Natural Gas Internal Combustion Eng
- Page 45 and 46: II.C Modeling Tools and Input Data
- Page 47 and 48: density within the modeling domain.
- Page 49 and 50: obstacles when released from small
- Page 51 and 52: II.C.2 Meteorological Parameters Se
- Page 53 and 54:
Where possible, we used NREL’s TM
- Page 55 and 56:
Surface Station + RADIOSONDE STATIO
- Page 57 and 58:
Mixing Height (m) 0 1,000 2,000 3,0
- Page 59 and 60:
Mixing Height (m) 0 200 400 600 800
- Page 61 and 62:
II.C.2.c Atmospheric Stability Clas
- Page 63 and 64:
The US Census designates Urbanized
- Page 65 and 66:
51 Table 12. Modeling designations,
- Page 67 and 68:
53 Table 12. con’t eGRID Name Duk
- Page 69 and 70:
55 Table 14. Modeling designations,
- Page 71 and 72:
Table 16. Modeling designations, em
- Page 73 and 74:
the same source. 21 When available,
- Page 75 and 76:
For each existing unit, emissions o
- Page 77 and 78:
The comparisons between case types
- Page 79 and 80:
generation technologies that we do
- Page 81 and 82:
Emission Factor (mg HCHO emitted /
- Page 83 and 84:
BACT Existing Central Station post-
- Page 85 and 86:
II.C.5 Pollutant Data Two pollutant
- Page 87 and 88:
II.D Modeled Parameters II.D.1 Inta
- Page 89 and 90:
from 0 km to 100 km in the x-direct
- Page 91 and 92:
III. Results and Discussion Differe
- Page 93 and 94:
Annual-Average Intake Fraction (per
- Page 95 and 96:
Annual-Average Intake Fraction (per
- Page 97 and 98:
III.A.1.b Hypothetical DG Cases Fig
- Page 99 and 100:
Annual-Average Intake Fraction (per
- Page 101 and 102:
Annual-Average Intake Fraction (per
- Page 103 and 104:
Annual-Average Intake Fraction (per
- Page 105 and 106:
Annual-Average Intake Fraction (per
- Page 107 and 108:
III.A.2 Results for Decaying Pollut
- Page 109 and 110:
Annual-Average Intake Fraction (per
- Page 111 and 112:
Table 19. Comparison of present res
- Page 113 and 114:
III.B Intake-to-Generation Ratio Re
- Page 115 and 116:
Annual-Average IGR (mg PM2.5 / MWh
- Page 117 and 118:
Annual-Average IGR (mg PM2.5 / MWh
- Page 119 and 120:
III.B.2 IGRs for Small-Scale DG Tec
- Page 121 and 122:
Central Stations HypDG at City Hall
- Page 123 and 124:
Dow ntow n DG equal to BACT at CS C
- Page 125 and 126:
III.D Summary of Results The intake
- Page 127 and 128:
Intake-to-Generation Ratio (mg/kWh
- Page 129 and 130:
Table 22. Summary of results for th
- Page 131 and 132:
Table 24. Summary of results for mi
- Page 133 and 134:
IV. Conclusions Political and marke
- Page 135 and 136:
modeling approach to achieve signif
- Page 137 and 138:
VI. Acknowledgements Julian Marshal
- Page 139 and 140:
http://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/em
- Page 141 and 142:
EPA. 2000a. Compilation of Air Poll
- Page 143 and 144:
INEGI. 2004. Twelfth General Census
- Page 145 and 146:
Venkatram A, Upadhyay J, Yuan J, He
- Page 147 and 148:
criteria pollutant air pollutant wh
- Page 149 and 150:
inhalation exposure average polluta
- Page 151 and 152:
secondary pollutant air contaminant
- Page 153 and 154:
P population density (people m -2 )
- Page 155 and 156:
2. Measured or modeled solar radiat
- Page 157 and 158:
data, which were already deemed typ
- Page 159 and 160:
A.2.1.4 Modifications Made to Radio
- Page 161 and 162:
A.2.2.3 Maximum Missing Span Each t
- Page 163 and 164:
A.3 Results This section contains t
- Page 165 and 166:
Sacramento (WBAN 23232) Radiosonde
- Page 167 and 168:
Arcata_Medford (WBAN 24283) Radioso
- Page 169 and 170:
Santa Maria (WBAN 23273) Radiosonde
- Page 171 and 172:
FSL/NCDC. 1997. Radiosonde CD Data
- Page 173 and 174:
B.1.1 Buoyant Rise For F < 55 m 4 s