16.08.2013 Views

Gravity Gradient Analysis at the GOCE HPF.pdf

Gravity Gradient Analysis at the GOCE HPF.pdf

Gravity Gradient Analysis at the GOCE HPF.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!

Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.

EGU, Session G7, 7 May 2010<br />

<strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>HPF</strong><br />

J. Bouman, S. Rispens, P. Visser,<br />

M.Veicherts, C.C. Tscherning, R. Pail,<br />

R. Mayrhofer, Th. Gruber, E. Schrama, M. Fuchs<br />

Bouman et al, <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong>s, Session G7, EGU Vienna, 7 May 2010


This present<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>Analysis</strong> of <strong>GOCE</strong> gravity gradients<br />

31 October 2009 – 11 January 2010<br />

External calibr<strong>at</strong>ion results<br />

Assessment of gravity gradient<br />

accuracy<br />

Bouman et al, <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong>s, Session G7, EGU Vienna, 7 May 2010


Temporal corrections<br />

<strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong> Preprocessing<br />

Outliers, d<strong>at</strong>a gaps External calibr<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Bouman et al, <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong>s, Session G7, EGU Vienna, 7 May 2010<br />

Frame trafo<br />

EGG_TRF_2<br />

EGG_NOM_2


EGG_NOM_2 & EGG_TRF_2<br />

• EGG_NOM_2:<br />

– Given in instrument frame (GRF)<br />

– Accur<strong>at</strong>e: V XX, V YY, V ZZ, V XZ; less accur<strong>at</strong>e: V XY, V YZ<br />

– Error increase <strong>at</strong> long wavelengths<br />

• EGG_TRF_2:<br />

– Given in Local North-Oriented Frame<br />

– GGs V XY, V YZ: <strong>GOCE</strong> gravity model<br />

– Long wavelength GG signal: <strong>GOCE</strong> gravity model<br />

– GG error expected to be more homogeneous<br />

Bouman et al, <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong>s, Session G7, EGU Vienna, 7 May 2010


EGG_NOM_2 & EGG_TRF_2<br />

• EGG_NOM_2:<br />

– Given in instrument frame (GRF)<br />

– Accur<strong>at</strong>e: V XX, V YY, V ZZ, V XZ; less accur<strong>at</strong>e: V XY, V YZ<br />

– Error increase <strong>at</strong> long wavelengths<br />

• EGG_TRF_2:<br />

– Given in Local North-Oriented Frame<br />

– GGs V XY, V YZ: <strong>GOCE</strong> gravity model<br />

– Long wavelength GG signal: <strong>GOCE</strong> gravity model<br />

– GG error expected to be more homogeneous<br />

Bouman et al, <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong>s, Session G7, EGU Vienna, 7 May 2010


EGG_NOM_2:<br />

3 revolutions November 1, 2009<br />

Bouman et al, <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong>s, Session G7, EGU Vienna, 7 May 2010


External calibr<strong>at</strong>ion (1)<br />

Global gravity field models (EIGEN5C)<br />

• Weekly GG scale factors (10 in total)<br />

• Gradiometer SF in-flight calibr<strong>at</strong>ion 10 -4<br />

• Confirmed by external calibr<strong>at</strong>ion using global<br />

gravity field models to 10 -3<br />

Diagonal gravity gradients Off-diagonal gravity gradients<br />

GG Mean Std<br />

Vxx 1.002 3*10 -4<br />

Vyy 1.001 8*10 -4<br />

Vzz 1.001 4*10 -4<br />

GG Mean Std<br />

Vxy 1.003 0.014<br />

Vxz 1.001 4*10 -4<br />

Vyz 1.005 0.017<br />

Bouman et al, <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong>s, Session G7, EGU Vienna, 7 May 2010


External calibr<strong>at</strong>ion (2)<br />

<strong>GOCE</strong> GPS d<strong>at</strong>a<br />

• Estim<strong>at</strong>ion of global 80 x 80 gravity field<br />

combining <strong>GOCE</strong> GPS d<strong>at</strong>a and GGs<br />

• GG scale factors co-estim<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

• 61 day repe<strong>at</strong> has 20 day sub-cycle: gravity field<br />

and GG SFs every 20 days<br />

Diagonal gravity gradients<br />

GG Mean Std<br />

Vxx 1.007 8*10 -3<br />

Vyy 1.005 4*10 -3<br />

Vzz 1.003 2*10 -3<br />

Bouman et al, <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong>s, Session G7, EGU Vienna, 7 May 2010


External calibr<strong>at</strong>ion (3): Terrestrial gravity d<strong>at</strong>a<br />

• For each track in area GG SF estim<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

• SF accepted if [0.9 – 1.1]<br />

• SF of accur<strong>at</strong>e GGs reliable (10 -2 level)<br />

• SF of less accur<strong>at</strong>e GGs unreliable (5 – 10%<br />

accepted)<br />

Calibr<strong>at</strong>ion areas<br />

Canada (134 tracks)<br />

GG % Mean Std<br />

Vxx 93 1.02 0.04<br />

Vyy 87 0.99 0.04<br />

Vzz 90 1.01 0.04<br />

Bouman et al, <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong>s, Session G7, EGU Vienna, 7 May 2010


<strong>GOCE</strong> QL gravity model:<br />

• GGs and GPS tracking<br />

• D<strong>at</strong>a from November and<br />

December 2009<br />

• SH degree 200<br />

• Error assessment using<br />

GG residuals<br />

Estim<strong>at</strong>ed GG error SDs<br />

V XX, V YY, V ZZ<br />

Measurement<br />

Band (MB)<br />

• V XX and V YY same noise level in MB, V ZZ 2x larger<br />

• Noise reduction in upper MB is “work in progress”<br />

(Fehringer et al, Floberghagen et al, earlier this morning)<br />

Bouman et al, <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong>s, Session G7, EGU Vienna, 7 May 2010


EGG_NOM_2 & EGG_TRF_2<br />

• EGG_NOM_2:<br />

– Given in instrument frame (GRF)<br />

– Accur<strong>at</strong>e: V XX, V YY, V ZZ, V XZ; less accur<strong>at</strong>e: V XY, V YZ<br />

– Error increase <strong>at</strong> long wavelengths<br />

• EGG_TRF_2:<br />

– Given in Local North-Oriented Frame<br />

– GGs V XY, V YZ: <strong>GOCE</strong> QL gravity field model<br />

– Long wavelength GG signal: <strong>GOCE</strong> gravity model<br />

– GG error expected to be more homogeneous<br />

Bouman et al, <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong>s, Session G7, EGU Vienna, 7 May 2010


EGG_NOM_2 & EGG_TRF_2:<br />

3 revolutions November 1, 2009<br />

EGG_NOM_2 EGG_TRF_2<br />

Bouman et al, <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong>s, Session G7, EGU Vienna, 7 May 2010


EGG_TRF_2: compared with EIGEN5C<br />

V XX differences <strong>GOCE</strong> & EIGEN5C<br />

Binned averages 31 October 2009 - 11 January 2010<br />

Bouman et al, <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong>s, Session G7, EGU Vienna, 7 May 2010<br />

[mE]


EGG_TRF_2: compared with EIGEN5C<br />

V YY differences <strong>GOCE</strong> & EIGEN5C<br />

Binned averages 31 October 2009 - 11 January 2010<br />

Bouman et al, <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong>s, Session G7, EGU Vienna, 7 May 2010<br />

[mE]


EGG_TRF_2: compared with EIGEN5C<br />

V ZZ differences <strong>GOCE</strong> & EIGEN5C<br />

Binned averages 31 October 2009 - 11 January 2010<br />

Bouman et al, <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong>s, Session G7, EGU Vienna, 7 May 2010<br />

[mE]


EGG_TRF_2: V XX compared with EIGEN5C<br />

Bouman et al, <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong>s, Session G7, EGU Vienna, 7 May 2010


EGG_TRF_2: V YY compared with EIGEN5C<br />

Bouman et al, <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong>s, Session G7, EGU Vienna, 7 May 2010


Summary<br />

• <strong>GOCE</strong> gravity gradients in GRF and LNOF<br />

(EGG_NOM_2 & EGG_TRF_2)<br />

• November 2009 – January 2010 timeframe<br />

• Differences with EIGEN5C (Africa, Himalaya, …)<br />

• Error level V ZZ about 2x th<strong>at</strong> of V XX, V YY in MB<br />

• Spurious tracks V YY close to magnetic poles:<br />

– Not well understood<br />

– Very likely rel<strong>at</strong>ed to magnetic field<br />

– Seems to diminish after in-flight calibr<strong>at</strong>ion 11/12 January 2010<br />

• Overall, GG d<strong>at</strong>a look very good<br />

Bouman et al, <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong>s, Session G7, EGU Vienna, 7 May 2010


Back-up slides follow<br />

Bouman et al, <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong>s, Session G7, EGU Vienna, 7 May 2010


SD Vzz, 1 day <br />

SDs Vzz temporal<br />

corrections, 1 day<br />

<br />

Vzz time series, 1 day<br />

Bouman et al, <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong>s, Session G7, EGU Vienna, 7 May 2010


EGG_TRF_2: compared with EGM2008<br />

V XX differences <strong>GOCE</strong> & EGM2008 (N = 360)<br />

Binned averages 31 October 2009 - 11 January 2010<br />

Bouman et al, <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong>s, Session G7, EGU Vienna, 7 May 2010<br />

[mE]


EGG_TRF_2: compared with EGM2008<br />

V YY differences <strong>GOCE</strong> & EGM2008 (N = 360)<br />

Binned averages 31 October 2009 - 11 January 2010<br />

Bouman et al, <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong>s, Session G7, EGU Vienna, 7 May 2010<br />

[mE]


EGG_TRF_2: compared with EGM2008<br />

V ZZ differences <strong>GOCE</strong> & EGM2008 (N = 360)<br />

Binned averages 31 October 2009 - 11 January 2010<br />

Bouman et al, <strong>GOCE</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Gradient</strong>s, Session G7, EGU Vienna, 7 May 2010<br />

[mE]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!