gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge
gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge
gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 37: Household Past Year Reported Expenditure on Gambl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Canada by<br />
Household Income Group <strong>in</strong> 2008.<br />
Average Household Gambl<strong>in</strong>g as a % <strong>of</strong> Total<br />
Household Income<br />
% who<br />
Gamble<br />
Gambl<strong>in</strong>g Expenditure<br />
All<br />
Households<br />
Households<br />
that Gamble<br />
All<br />
Households<br />
Income<br />
Households<br />
that Gamble<br />
Less than $20,000 51% $200 $395 1.5% 2.8%<br />
$20,000 to $39,999 66% $330 $500 1.1% 1.7%<br />
$40,000 to $59,999 73% $345 $475 0.7% 1.0%<br />
$60,000 to $79,999 77% $305 $390 0.4% 0.6%<br />
$80,000 and over 78% $430 $555 0.4% 0.5%<br />
AVERAGE 70% $335 $480 0.5% 0.6%<br />
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey <strong>of</strong> Household Spend<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
On the other hand, earlier research (Table 22a, p. 111) has also documented that the roughly<br />
6% <strong>of</strong> people who contribute 75% <strong>of</strong> reported Alberta <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue tend to be <strong>in</strong><br />
somewhat higher <strong>in</strong>come brackets compared to the general population. Thus, a more detailed<br />
exam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> Alberta <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> expenditure as a function <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>come group is warranted.<br />
The primary source <strong>of</strong> data on <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> expenditure comes from the population surveys. Table<br />
38 presents the comb<strong>in</strong>ed data from the 2008 and 2009 Alberta population surveys (i.e.,<br />
General Population + Onl<strong>in</strong>e + Targeted Samples) that conta<strong>in</strong> reports from 12,587 adult<br />
Albertans (N = 15,166 m<strong>in</strong>us 2,579 miss<strong>in</strong>g cases for people who did not report <strong>in</strong>come).<br />
Aggregate personal monthly expenditure on all government-sponsored <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> (i.e.,<br />
everyth<strong>in</strong>g except Internet <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, social <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, and <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> on high risk stocks), was<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ed for <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>in</strong> each <strong>in</strong>come group and multiplied by 12 to produce a yearly<br />
amount.<br />
Results are similar to what was found with the Canadian Survey <strong>of</strong> Household Spend<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> that<br />
people <strong>in</strong> higher <strong>in</strong>come brackets spend proportionately less <strong>of</strong> their <strong>in</strong>come on <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> than<br />
do people <strong>in</strong> lower <strong>in</strong>come brackets. 68 However, the highest average expenditure occurs <strong>in</strong><br />
people with<strong>in</strong> the highest <strong>in</strong>come bracket (although the second highest average occurs <strong>in</strong> the <<br />
$20,000 <strong>in</strong>come group). Further to this po<strong>in</strong>t, although <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> Alberta is clearly regressive,<br />
the last column <strong>of</strong> Table 38 shows that the majority <strong>of</strong> total reported <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> expenditure<br />
(52.5%) comes from people with higher than average <strong>in</strong>comes (i.e. > $50,000) (median personal<br />
<strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong> 2008 <strong>in</strong> Alberta was $35,550 69 ). It is also important to recognize that Table 37 shows<br />
that average <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> expenditure is many times higher than median expenditure because <strong>of</strong> a<br />
68 It is worth remember<strong>in</strong>g that lower <strong>in</strong>come people spend proportionally more <strong>of</strong> their <strong>in</strong>come on most<br />
consumer products compared to higher <strong>in</strong>come people.<br />
69 Statistics Canada Table 111-0008. Individuals by Total Income Level, by Prov<strong>in</strong>ce and Territory.<br />
153