18.08.2013 Views

gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge

gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge

gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 37: Household Past Year Reported Expenditure on Gambl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Canada by<br />

Household Income Group <strong>in</strong> 2008.<br />

Average Household Gambl<strong>in</strong>g as a % <strong>of</strong> Total<br />

Household Income<br />

% who<br />

Gamble<br />

Gambl<strong>in</strong>g Expenditure<br />

All<br />

Households<br />

Households<br />

that Gamble<br />

All<br />

Households<br />

Income<br />

Households<br />

that Gamble<br />

Less than $20,000 51% $200 $395 1.5% 2.8%<br />

$20,000 to $39,999 66% $330 $500 1.1% 1.7%<br />

$40,000 to $59,999 73% $345 $475 0.7% 1.0%<br />

$60,000 to $79,999 77% $305 $390 0.4% 0.6%<br />

$80,000 and over 78% $430 $555 0.4% 0.5%<br />

AVERAGE 70% $335 $480 0.5% 0.6%<br />

Source: Statistics Canada, Survey <strong>of</strong> Household Spend<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

On the other hand, earlier research (Table 22a, p. 111) has also documented that the roughly<br />

6% <strong>of</strong> people who contribute 75% <strong>of</strong> reported Alberta <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue tend to be <strong>in</strong><br />

somewhat higher <strong>in</strong>come brackets compared to the general population. Thus, a more detailed<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> Alberta <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> expenditure as a function <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>come group is warranted.<br />

The primary source <strong>of</strong> data on <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> expenditure comes from the population surveys. Table<br />

38 presents the comb<strong>in</strong>ed data from the 2008 and 2009 Alberta population surveys (i.e.,<br />

General Population + Onl<strong>in</strong>e + Targeted Samples) that conta<strong>in</strong> reports from 12,587 adult<br />

Albertans (N = 15,166 m<strong>in</strong>us 2,579 miss<strong>in</strong>g cases for people who did not report <strong>in</strong>come).<br />

Aggregate personal monthly expenditure on all government-sponsored <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> (i.e.,<br />

everyth<strong>in</strong>g except Internet <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, social <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, and <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> on high risk stocks), was<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed for <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>in</strong> each <strong>in</strong>come group and multiplied by 12 to produce a yearly<br />

amount.<br />

Results are similar to what was found with the Canadian Survey <strong>of</strong> Household Spend<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> that<br />

people <strong>in</strong> higher <strong>in</strong>come brackets spend proportionately less <strong>of</strong> their <strong>in</strong>come on <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> than<br />

do people <strong>in</strong> lower <strong>in</strong>come brackets. 68 However, the highest average expenditure occurs <strong>in</strong><br />

people with<strong>in</strong> the highest <strong>in</strong>come bracket (although the second highest average occurs <strong>in</strong> the <<br />

$20,000 <strong>in</strong>come group). Further to this po<strong>in</strong>t, although <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> Alberta is clearly regressive,<br />

the last column <strong>of</strong> Table 38 shows that the majority <strong>of</strong> total reported <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> expenditure<br />

(52.5%) comes from people with higher than average <strong>in</strong>comes (i.e. > $50,000) (median personal<br />

<strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong> 2008 <strong>in</strong> Alberta was $35,550 69 ). It is also important to recognize that Table 37 shows<br />

that average <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> expenditure is many times higher than median expenditure because <strong>of</strong> a<br />

68 It is worth remember<strong>in</strong>g that lower <strong>in</strong>come people spend proportionally more <strong>of</strong> their <strong>in</strong>come on most<br />

consumer products compared to higher <strong>in</strong>come people.<br />

69 Statistics Canada Table 111-0008. Individuals by Total Income Level, by Prov<strong>in</strong>ce and Territory.<br />

153

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!