Little Red River Cree Nation 8 $125,415 $259,585 $954,580 $980,902 $2,320,482 11 4103 Loon River Cree Nation 8 $53,373 $223,195 $398,384 $407,963 $1,082,915 18 445 Louis Bull Tribe 6 $0 $250,000 $606,458 $619,993 $1,476,451 10 1799 Mikisew Cree First Nation 8 $0 $486,000 $699,972 $713,154 $1,899,126 18 2412 Montana Band 6 $0 $243,555 $460,924 $468,586 $1,173,065 24 873 O'Chiese Band 6 $0 $250,000 $470,706 $484,633 $1,205,339 9 921 Paul First Nation 6 $78,997 $332,687 $587,192 $606,769 $1,605,645 18 1713 Piikani Nation 7 $86,130 $341,181 $842,837 $853,120 $2,123,268 16 3424 Saddle Lake First Nation 6 $130,510 $583,589 $1,268,468 $1,309,421 $3,291,988 74 8577 Samson Cree Nation 6 $176,761 $627,971 $1,306,069 $1,380,741 $3,491,542 42 6677 Sawridge First Nation 8 $51,685 $215,079 $381,785 $392,511 $1,041,060 55 367 Siksika Nation 7 $0 $882,814 $1,265,800 $1,284,905 $3,433,519 17 6141 Smith's Land<strong>in</strong>g FN 8 $50,643 $210,847 $375,413 $382,556 $1,019,459 16 302 Stoney Nakoda Band 7 $133,210 $569,978 $2,674,244 $3,434,944 $6,812,376 15 4416 Sturgeon Lake Band 8 $80,000 $374,311 $714,050 $733,212 $1,901,573 24 2534 Sucker Creek First Nation 8 $90,470 $381,648 $677,149 $689,827 $1,839,094 27 2280 Sunchild First Nation 6 $67,097 $284,763 $507,311 $516,876 $1,376,048 10 1158 Swan River First Nation 8 $65,649 $275,524 $489,231 $499,640 $1,330,044 25 1051 Tallcree First Nation 8 $0 $340,727 $400,273 $226,996 $967,996 9 1044 Tsuu Tìna Nation 7 $0 $8,246,214 $28,572,460 $28,920,214 $65,738,888 97 1581 Whitefish (Goodfish) FN 6 $72,601 $392,182 $694,785 $689,381 $1,848,949 12 2378 WhiteFish Lake FN 8 $85,653 $184,347 $639,950 $652,384 $1,562,334 11 2060 Woodland Cree FN 8 $0 $330,067 $472,485 $480,324 $1,282,876 13 689 224
Table 60 illustrates that the largest beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> the FNDF have been the 5 First Nations that host cas<strong>in</strong>os. However, there is considerable variability with<strong>in</strong> this group <strong>of</strong> 5, with the Enoch Cree First Nation (River Cree Cas<strong>in</strong>o and Resort) and the Tsuu T’<strong>in</strong>a First Nation (Grey Eagle Cas<strong>in</strong>o) be<strong>in</strong>g the ma<strong>in</strong> beneficiaries (Figure 47). This is almost certa<strong>in</strong>ly due to the fact that the River Cree Cas<strong>in</strong>o is just outside <strong>of</strong> Edmonton and the Grey Eagle Cas<strong>in</strong>o is just outside <strong>of</strong> Calgary, whereas the other 3 cas<strong>in</strong>os are located <strong>in</strong> rural areas. $40,000,000 $35,000,000 $30,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 Figure 47: FNDF Allocations for the 5 First Nations that Host Cas<strong>in</strong>os. Enoch Cree Nation Tsuu T'<strong>in</strong>a Nation Cold Lake First Nations FNDF Revenue as a Proportion <strong>of</strong> Total Revenue Alexis Nakota Sioux Nation Stoney Nakoda Nation 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 The primary source <strong>of</strong> First Nations revenue has traditionally been federal government payments through Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC). The fund<strong>in</strong>g formula calculates <strong>in</strong>dividual First Nations fund<strong>in</strong>g levels based on populations. 94 In the case <strong>of</strong> the 5 communities that host cas<strong>in</strong>os, these <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> monies represent a significant portion <strong>of</strong> their overall revenue. For example, Enoch’s FNDF disbursement <strong>of</strong> $35 million <strong>in</strong> 2008/2009 was 303% more than its INAC’s budgetary allocation (Table 61). Similarly Tsuu T’<strong>in</strong>a received more than $28 million, which was 142% more than its INAC budget. Despite lower than expected returns, <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenues also contribute noticeably to the Alexis Nakota Sioux Nation’s and the Cold Lake First Nations’ overall budget. The Stoney 94 Because there is no stipulation about what percentage <strong>of</strong> INAC fund<strong>in</strong>g bands should provide to <strong>of</strong>f-reserve residents, <strong>in</strong> most cases these monies are spent exclusively on reserves to the detriment <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>f-reserve members. 225
- Page 1 and 2:
Plant fertilizer 2011 GAMBLING IN A
- Page 3 and 4:
Citation Williams, R.J., Belanger,
- Page 5 and 6:
AMOUNTS, ORIGINS, AND RECIPIENTS OF
- Page 7 and 8:
ABSTRACT At a provincial level, the
- Page 9 and 10:
Alberta is estimated to have 3,755,
- Page 11 and 12:
than empirical in nature. Thus, the
- Page 13 and 14:
While the above described approach
- Page 15 and 16:
census. A supplemental Online Gener
- Page 17 and 18:
THEORETICAL APPROACH PROBLEMS WITH
- Page 19 and 20:
Aside from these practical issues,
- Page 21 and 22:
SOUND PRINCIPLES FOR CONDUCTING SOC
- Page 23 and 24:
Again, other ways of organizing and
- Page 25 and 26:
4. The transfer of wealth and chang
- Page 27 and 28:
Compare Changes to those Observed i
- Page 29 and 30:
to document prior gambling opportun
- Page 31 and 32:
Mid 1700s to late 1800s 1869 - 1892
- Page 33 and 34:
Cheating at gambling (Part XXVIII F
- Page 35 and 36:
1924 Criminal Code amendment to s.9
- Page 37 and 38:
1957 Western Canadian Racing Associ
- Page 39 and 40:
1980s There is a major expansion of
- Page 41 and 42:
1989 In June the Criminal Code of C
- Page 43 and 44:
1997 AGLC allows the number of slot
- Page 45 and 46:
2003 Federal agriculture minister m
- Page 47 and 48:
HISTORY OF EACH TYPE OF GAMBLING Th
- Page 49 and 50:
Number of Live Race Days per Year I
- Page 51 and 52:
Table 1: Total Raffle Licences per
- Page 53 and 54:
Table 2: Total Pull-Ticket Licences
- Page 55 and 56:
Table 3: Total Bingo Licences per Y
- Page 57 and 58:
Table 5: Total Bingo Events per Yea
- Page 59 and 60:
Table 6: Total Lottery Ticket Retai
- Page 61 and 62:
Video Lottery Terminals (VLTs) In A
- Page 63 and 64:
Table 8: Total Video Lottery Locati
- Page 65 and 66:
1996 Slot machines and electronic h
- Page 67 and 68:
The main indices that speak to chan
- Page 69 and 70:
Table 12: Total Charitable Casino L
- Page 71 and 72:
REGULATORY AND ORGANIZATIONAL HISTO
- Page 73 and 74:
HISTORY OF FIRST NATIONS COMMERCIAL
- Page 75 and 76:
CURRENT REGULATION, AVAILABILITY, A
- Page 77 and 78:
aggregate value of all tickets sold
- Page 79 and 80:
ALBERTA GOVERNMENT GAMBLING The Cri
- Page 81 and 82:
CASINOS Traditional Casinos Casinos
- Page 83 and 84:
percentage of table game revenue re
- Page 85 and 86:
Figure 15. Location of Current and
- Page 87 and 88:
HORSE RACING Horse racing is the on
- Page 89 and 90:
Bingo Lotteries and Instant Win (Sc
- Page 91 and 92:
AMOUNTS, ORIGINS, AND RECIPIENTS OF
- Page 93 and 94:
Another way of looking at the overa
- Page 95 and 96:
increase has occurred since the ear
- Page 97 and 98:
WHERE IS THE MONEY COMING FROM? As
- Page 99 and 100:
Figure 20: Proportion of Alberta Ne
- Page 101 and 102:
Origin of Net Gambling Revenue by D
- Page 103 and 104:
Table 18: Past Year Gambling Partic
- Page 105 and 106:
EGM Players Table 20 shows reasonab
- Page 107 and 108:
Table 21: Percentage of Each Type o
- Page 109 and 110:
winsorized then 75% of reported exp
- Page 111 and 112:
Table 22a: Demographic Profile of t
- Page 113 and 114:
patronage and revenue. Attendance f
- Page 115 and 116:
However, less important than the ac
- Page 117 and 118:
Because of the paramount importance
- Page 119 and 120:
Actual Revenue Another source of da
- Page 121 and 122:
Figure 25: Average Ticket Lottery R
- Page 123 and 124:
WHERE IS THE MONEY GOING? The final
- Page 125 and 126:
industry. The proportion of gamblin
- Page 127 and 128:
Table 27: Grants Awarded by Alberta
- Page 129 and 130:
since 1999; 47% of all revenue in 2
- Page 131 and 132:
IMPACTS OF LEGAL GAMBLING IMPACTS O
- Page 133 and 134:
‘addicted to gambling revenue’.
- Page 135 and 136:
Several factors influence the perce
- Page 137 and 138:
There are also some important lesso
- Page 139 and 140:
Figure 30: Proportion of Total Net
- Page 141 and 142:
Figure 31: Number of Charities per
- Page 143 and 144:
IMPACTS ON SOCIETY The citizens of
- Page 145 and 146:
Number of Alberta Gambling Employee
- Page 147 and 148:
Table 34: North American Industry C
- Page 149 and 150:
Table 35: Importance of Gambling as
- Page 151 and 152:
percentage of the population (i.e.,
- Page 153 and 154:
Table 37: Household Past Year Repor
- Page 155 and 156:
40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% F
- Page 157 and 158:
Although Albertans are satisfied wi
- Page 159 and 160:
A final attitude question asked in
- Page 161 and 162:
Figure 41: What sort of overall imp
- Page 163 and 164:
Prevalence Problem Gambling and Rel
- Page 165 and 166:
Williams & Volberg (2010) also calc
- Page 167 and 168:
Features of Problem Gamblers The ty
- Page 169 and 170:
significant change in reported casi
- Page 171 and 172:
Table 43: Gambling and Problem Gamb
- Page 173 and 174: their shared variance is taken into
- Page 175 and 176: Treatment Numbers and Costs Treatme
- Page 177 and 178: The only readily available figures
- Page 179 and 180: OSB reports there were a total of 7
- Page 181 and 182: Table 49: Consumer Insolvency Rates
- Page 183 and 184: Another approach is to establish th
- Page 185 and 186: that gambling had resulted in separ
- Page 187 and 188: Applying these prevalence rates to
- Page 189 and 190: gambling-related illegal acts and 8
- Page 191 and 192: It is important to remember that th
- Page 193 and 194: Table 52: Criminal Charges Laid by
- Page 195 and 196: early 1990s, that was followed by a
- Page 197 and 198: Table 54: Correlation between Crime
- Page 199 and 200: Infrastructure Value The private se
- Page 201 and 202: With respect to this first possibil
- Page 203 and 204: increase in the comparison periods;
- Page 205 and 206: Census Division Table 57: Business
- Page 207 and 208: versus 2.2%). Commercial insolvency
- Page 209 and 210: thinking in an interpretative act;
- Page 211 and 212: The Edmonton mayor indicated he bel
- Page 213 and 214: Several community representatives a
- Page 215 and 216: daytime usage ... if it’s shoppin
- Page 217 and 218: Increased crime was a related issue
- Page 219 and 220: IMPACT ON FIRST NATIONS The impact
- Page 221 and 222: Table 59: Use of First Nations Char
- Page 223: Table 60: Distributions to Differen
- Page 227 and 228: McKay, Heart Lake and the Athabasca
- Page 229 and 230: Geographical Distribution As seen i
- Page 231 and 232: Figure 51: Average Per Community FN
- Page 233 and 234: Employment and Income Impacts of Fi
- Page 235 and 236: etter skilled individuals in the co
- Page 237 and 238: Problem Gambling A recent review of
- Page 239 and 240: Table 65: Prevalence of Problem Gam
- Page 241 and 242: $500 chip. One municipal official c
- Page 243 and 244: Both the increased affluence and th
- Page 245 and 246: The Enoch Cree Nation has to pay ba
- Page 247 and 248: The fire department also represents
- Page 249 and 250: chances. One official stated that t
- Page 251 and 252: With the exception of 2006-2007, th
- Page 253 and 254: Post-Script: Barriers to Participat
- Page 255 and 256: (Indian Act, 1985). The latter coul
- Page 257 and 258: SUMMARY Research Approach The prese
- Page 259 and 260: 1% (or less) of Alberta GDP since t
- Page 261 and 262: can be said of charitable gambling
- Page 263 and 264: Because revenue from charity casino
- Page 265 and 266: Socioeconomic Inequality Alberta ga
- Page 267 and 268: Despite the relatively low rates of
- Page 269 and 270: supplies/equipment or to reinvest i
- Page 271 and 272: Some of these sentiments tend to su
- Page 273 and 274: communities highlight the casinos a
- Page 275 and 276:
ASSESSMENT OF THE OVERALL IMPACTS O
- Page 277 and 278:
2. The economic activity increases
- Page 279 and 280:
OVERALL SOCIAL IMPACTS Legalized ga
- Page 281 and 282:
OVERALL IMPACTS At a provincial lev
- Page 283 and 284:
however, that the potential for bri
- Page 285 and 286:
REFERENCES Abbott, M.W., Williams,
- Page 287 and 288:
Centre for Social and Health Outcom
- Page 289 and 290:
Jackson, D. (2010). VLT critic call
- Page 291 and 292:
Purdy, C. (2004). Band stakes its f
- Page 293 and 294:
Walker, D.M. (2008a). Challenges th
- Page 295 and 296:
2008 Survey APPENDICES Appendix A:
- Page 297 and 298:
General Population Targeted INELIGI
- Page 299 and 300:
are interested in the opinions of b
- Page 301 and 302:
PAST YEAR GAMBLING BEHAVIOUR GY1a.
- Page 303 and 304:
GY6a. In the past 12 months, how of
- Page 305 and 306:
Cash Casino - Red Deer (15) Jackpot
- Page 307 and 308:
GY10a. In the past 12 months, how o
- Page 309 and 310:
GY14a. In the past 12 months, what
- Page 311 and 312:
GP4. CPGI4/PPGM8b. In the past 12 m
- Page 313 and 314:
GP11b. In the past 12 months has ga
- Page 315 and 316:
GP16a. PPGM8c. In the past 12 month
- Page 317 and 318:
The following question only asked o
- Page 319 and 320:
TRIANGULATION (ONLINE PANEL ONLY) T
- Page 321 and 322:
Exact amount________________ (17) U
- Page 323 and 324:
2009 Survey The 2009 survey was als
- Page 325 and 326:
C11. Do you have pleasant memories
- Page 327 and 328:
SURVEY YEAR 1992 1993 1995 1996 199
- Page 329 and 330:
2008 2008 2009 2009 Williams, Belan
- Page 331 and 332:
1 Medicine Hat 2 Lethbridge 3 Fort
- Page 333 and 334:
8. In the past 12 months, have you
- Page 335 and 336:
Appendix F: Alberta’s Economic Re
- Page 337:
7. A thorough due diligence investi