Example of the Netherlands

coe.int

Example of the Netherlands

The Netherlands’

Netherlands

example

Small and beautiful? beautiful

Christiaan Baardman

Judge Court of Appeal at The Hague

Researcher Expertise Centre on Cybercrime

Octopus conference CoE

23 March, March,

2010


Expertise Centre on Cybercrime

established 1 April 2009

2 judges + 1 court secretary (= 1,6 fte) fte

5 objectives:

objectives

database

website

employment agency

helpdesk

in-service in service training

contact: contact:

cybercrime@rechtspraak.nl

cybercrime@rechtspraak.nl


Cyber info (1)

Principles:

Principles

1. no exclusive forum

→ each and any judge competent

→each each and any judge equipped

2. Buttom up development

Top down (centralised

( centralised) ) information

3. information channels

newsletters

• individuals (subscribers

subscribers)

• points of contact (all ( all courts) courts

in-service in service training

seminars


Cyber info (2)

Website

Wiki based

Newsletters

caselaw

• both domestic and foreign judgments

legislative developments

media coverage

yearly seminars

“Roadshows

Roadshows”

awareness

marketing

legal developments (caselaw caselaw) )

Training

in-service in service


Website (1)


Website (2)


In-service In service training

both judges and prosecutors (and court secretaries)

secretaries

2 levels: levels

basic

• 1 day

• this year: year:

7x

• Team High Tech Crime & Telecom (Prosec Prosec. . Office)

advanced

• 2 x 2 days

• this year: year:

2x

• forensic IT-expert IT expert + Team High Tech Crime &

Telecom (Prosec Prosec. . Office)

More magazines by this user
Similar magazines